alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the report of Ring Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 10, 2010   /s/ Robert Steve Owens Robert Steve Owens, President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Wilson Cheung



Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer

August 6, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1444]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Civil Tiltrotor Development Advisory Committee Termination

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Civil Tiltrotor Development Advisory Committee 
Termination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the termination of the Civil 
Tiltrotor Development Advisory Committee. The committee was established 
to evaluate the technical feasibility and economic viability of 
developing civil tiltrotor aircraft and a national system of 
infrastructure to support the incorporation of tiltrotor aircraft 
technology into the national transportation system.
    The committee was terminated after submission of its report to 
Congress on December 29, 1995, and its continuation is no longer in the 
public interest in connection with the performance of FAA by law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Smith, (AND-610), Office of 
Communications, Navigation and Surveillance systems, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone 202-267-3783.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 19, 1996.
Robert D. Smith,
Designated Federal Official, Civil Tiltrotor Development Advisory 
Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-1444 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 24.2


CERTIFIED
RESOLUTIONS
 
 Certified
to be a true and correct copy of the resolutions adopted by the Board of
Directors of PMA Capital Corporation at a meeting held on February 9, 2005, a
quorum being present, and such resolutions are still in full force and effect as
of this date of certification, not having been amended, modified or rescinded
since the date of their adoption.
 
 RESOLVED,
that the Officers of the Company, and each of them, are hereby authorized to
sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, and any amendments thereto, (the "Form 10-K") in the name and on behalf of
the Company and as attorneys for each of its Directors and
Officers.
 
 RESOLVED,
that each Officer and Director of the Company who may be required to execute
(whether on behalf of the Company or as an Officer or Director thereof) the Form
10-K, is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a power of attorney appointing
such person or persons named therein as true and lawful attorneys and agents to
execute in the name, place and stead (in any such capacity) of any such Officer
or Director the Form 10-K and to file any such power of attorney together with
the Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Company, this 16th day of March, 2005.
 
 
 /s/
      Joseph W. La BargeJoseph
      W. La BargeAssistant
      Secretary
  
 
 (SEAL)
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: December 15, 2016 522561

________________________________ In the Matter of DAVID YOUNG, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: October 25, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

__________ David Young, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.-2- 522561

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
H. Res. 862 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 13, 2010. 

Whereas the United States House of Representatives has repeatedly recognized in passed legislation the importance 

of science, technology, engineering, and math education 

at all levels as a necessary part of strengthening the future of scientific research in the United States; 

Whereas the Intel Corporation holds an annual ‘‘Intel Schools 

of Distinction’’ competition in which schools compete for 

grants by demonstrating an environment and curricula 

that demonstrates 21st century teaching and learning, 

with a focus on mathematics and science; 

Whereas the annual Intel School of Distinction awards recognize United States schools that implement innovative 

math and science programs and serve as role models for 

other schools; 

Whereas each year, only one school across the country is selected through this competition as the ‘‘Star Innovator’’ 

among the 18 finalists receiving the Intel Schools of Distinction honor; 

Whereas, on September 15, 2009, the Illinois Mathematics 

and Science Academy, a State-supported boarding school 

serving 650 of Illinois’ top high school mathematics stu-
2 

•HRES 862 EH 

dents, was selected as the 2009 Star Innovator in the 

Intel Schools of Distinction competition; 

Whereas Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy alum are 

currently working at the head of their fields in such diverse industries as aerospace engineering, biotechnology, 

forensic science, and academic institutions across the 

globe; 

Whereas Leon Lederman, the recipient of the Nobel Prize in 

Physics in 1988, worked to create the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy as a school that could not 

only provide children with an invaluable education in 

science and mathematics, but also to train thousands of 

Illinois teachers in the art of teaching those skills; and 

Whereas the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy has 

clearly demonstrated a continued dedication to offering 

the kind of education necessary to create future generations of scientists in the United States, and thus secure 

the future of scientific research in the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the staff, students, and faculty at 

the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy on this 

award and wish them well in all their future endeavors; 

and be it further; and 

(2) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make available enrolled copies of this resolution 
3 

•HRES 862 EH 

to the Illinois Math and Science Academy for appropriate display. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00277-CV

__________________

FOSTER TIMBER, LTD., Appellant

V.

TYLER EPSTEIN, TRUSTEE OF THE ELMWOOD REVOCABLE TRUST, 

Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 411th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CIV21-0338

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Foster Timber, Ltd., Appellant, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The Appellant filed the motion before the appellate court 

issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 25, 2023

Opinion Delivered October 26, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Douglas A. Neugold, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ATMI, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 22, 2008         /s/ Douglas A. Neugold   Douglas A. Neugold    President and Chief Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jason Dussault, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dussault Apparel
      Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Dussault Apparel Inc.                                                                

Dated: September 20, 2010



| | /s/
      Jason Dussault             
| | -------------------------------------
| | Jason Dussault                       
| | Chief Executive Officer and President
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        
| | Dussault Apparel Inc.                



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dussault Apparel
Inc. and will be retained by Dussault Apparel Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
STEVEN LAURIE HARTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5696

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 7, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Edward P. Nickinson, III, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Appellate case number: 01-19-00202-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-14078

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Relator the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus as well as a motion for emergency relief, requesting a stay of trial court proceedings. 

This Court requested a response to the emergency motion and the petition for writ of mandamus, 

but none were filed. 

The motion for emergency relief is GRANTED and all trial court proceedings are 

STAYED pending this Court’s disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus or further order 

of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___Justice Richard Hightower________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: 04/10/2019
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona

RAYNETTE LOGAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Arizona State Bar No. 016695

Two Renaissance Square 40 N. Central Ave., Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Telephone: 602-514-7500

Email: Raynette.Logan@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Mary Alice Reed,

 Defendant.

No. CR-18-00310-PHX-DJH

INFORMATION TO ESTABLISH 

PRIOR CONVICTION PURSUANT TO 

21 U.S.C. ' 851

The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United 

States Attorney, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1), files this information to establish the 

prior felony drug conviction of defendant Mary Alice Reed. Accordingly, the United States 

hereby notifies the Court and the defendant of the following:

1. On or about September 20, 2010, the defendant was convicted of a felony 

drug crime in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1) (Possession with 

Intent to Distribute Five Grams or More of Methamphetamine) in the United States District 

Court, District of Arizona, in Case No. CR 09-01276-002-PHX-DGC (see Attachment A; 

see also Discovery Bates Stamp #s 00006-00009).

Because of this prior felony drug conviction, the enhanced penalty provision of 21 

U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(B) and the applicable maximum penalty for the charge against 

defendant are as follows:

Count 1: A mandatory term of 10 years’ imprisonment and up to life imprisonment, 

a fine of $8,000,000.00, or both, a term of supervised release of at least eight (8) years and 

Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 9 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

up to life, and a mandatory special assessment of $100, which would be due at sentencing.

Respectfully submitted this 12th day of March, 2018.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant States Attorney

District of Arizona

 s/Raynette M. Logan 

RAYNETTE M. LOGAN 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 12th day of March, 2018, I electronically transmitted 

the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrant:

Philip Seplow

Counsel for Defendant

s/ Rebecca Clarke Robinaugh

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 9 Filed 03/12/18 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Golden Opportunities Corporation, for the period ending April 30, 2011, I, Michael Zahorik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Golden Opportunities Corporation hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golden Opportunities Corporation.





Date: May 30, 2011/s/ Michael ZahorikMichael ZahorikChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
#### Sharon A. LEVETT, Appellant, v. Jerry D. LEVETT, Respondent.

No. WD 47797.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 22, 1994.

Steven E. Raymond, Shelbyville, for appellant.

Hadley E. Grimm, Macon, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sharon Levett appeals the trial court’s decree dissolving her marriage to John Levett. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

EUGENE LAMBERT, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 62 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary 

Relief is GRANTED to the extent it seeks mandamus relief. The Court of Common 

Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to adjudicate Petitioner’s pending petition 

within 90 days.
Exhibit 15.1





April 26, 2013



Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F. Street N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



We were previously principal accountants
for China Southern Airlines Company Limited and, under the date of March 26, 2013, we reported on the consolidated financial
statements of China Southern Airlines Company Limited as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the effectiveness
of China Southern Airlines Company Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. On March
26, 2013, we were notified that the auditor-client relationship between KPMG and China Southern Airlines Company Limited will cease
upon completion of the audit of China Southern Airlines Company Limited’s consolidated financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2012 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,
and the issuance of our reports thereon. On April 26, 2013, we completed our audit and issued our reports that were included in
China Southern Airlines Company Limited’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.



We have read China Southern Airlines Company
Limited’s statements included under Item 16F of its annual report onForm 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2012,and we agree with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree
with the statements that: (1) “During the two most recent fiscal years and through April 26, 2013, neither we nor any person
on our behalf consulted PwC regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed
or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, or (ii) any matter that was either
the subject of a “disagreement” (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F and related instructions to Item 16-F
of Form 20-F) with PwC or a “reportable event” (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F).” and (2) “Also,
during the two most recent fiscal years and through April 26, 2013, we have not obtained any written report or oral advice that
PwC concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting
issue.”



Very truly yours,



/s/ KPMG

Hong Kong, China

April 26, 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23
Consent

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Northway Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 16, 2004, relating to
the consolidated statements of financial condition of Northway Financial, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2003.

                                         /S/ Shatswell, Macleod & Company, P.C.
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 23, 2004