alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona

KEVIN M. RAPP (Ariz. Bar No. 14249, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov)

MARGARET PERLMETER (Ariz. Bar No. 024805, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov)

PETER S. KOZINETS (Ariz. Bar No. 019856, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov)

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone (602) 514-7500

JOHN J. KUCERA (Cal. Bar No. 274184, john.kucera@usdoj.gov)

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

312 N. Spring Street, Suite 1200

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Telephone (213) 894-3391

JOHN P. CRONAN

Acting Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES (Miss. Bar No. 102806, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov)

Senior Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Room 2116

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone (202) 616-2807 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendant.

No. CR 18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

NOTICE OF

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

NOTICE is hereby given, in accordance with Local Rule 83.3(a) of the Rules of 

Practice for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, that Assistant United States 

Attorney Peter S. Kozinets is substituted in place of Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 146 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dominic Lanza as attorney for the United States.

Respectfully submitted this 15th day of May, 2018.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona

s/Peter S. Kozinets

PETER S. KOZINETS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Certificate of Service:

I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically transmitted the attached document 

to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice of 

Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Paul Cambria, James Grant, Robert 

Corn-Revere, Ronald London, Bruce Feder, Michael Kimerer, KC Maxwell, Michael 

Piccarreta, Stephen Weiss. 

s/Sally Hawley

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 146 Filed 05/15/18 Page 2 of 2
| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Silverstar Mining Corp. for the period      ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Silverstar      Mining Corp.                                                                    |

|   | /s/      Lawrence Siccia                                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Lawrence      Siccia                                          |
|   | President      and Director                                   |
|   | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer |
|   | and      Principal Accounting Officer                         |
|   | Silverstar      Mining Corp.                                  |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 794 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 794

   Calling for a runoff election in Afghanistan between the two top 
                               finishers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2009

Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself, Mr. Delahunt, and Mr. Burton of Indiana) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Calling for a runoff election in Afghanistan between the two top 
                               finishers.

Whereas nearly one in four votes in last month's Afghan presidential elections 
        were cast at polling stations now subject to a recount and audit for 
        possible fraud;
Whereas approximately one-third of Mr. Karzai's 3,100,000 votes were cast at 
        polling stations that face a recount and audit of ballot boxes;
Whereas based on the criteria set by the Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC), 
        a United Nations backed Afghan and international panel that is the 
        ultimate arbiter of the election, almost 3,000 of the 23,000 polling 
        stations would be subject to the fraud review;
Whereas those polling stations account for a large proportion of ballots, some 
        1,350,000 of 5,660,000 total votes;
Whereas the ECC said that it had found ``clear and convincing evidence of fraud 
        in a number of polling stations'' in the southern and eastern provinces;
Whereas the analysis also shows that slightly more than a quarter million of Mr. 
        Karzai's votes came from polling stations where he received exactly 600 
        ballots and no other candidate received a single vote;
Whereas, on September 10, 2009, the ECC ordered the invalidation of certain 
        ballots from 51 polling stations in Kandahar province and from 27 
        polling stations in Ghazni province, and ordered the International 
        Election Commission (IEC) to invalidate results from 5 polling stations 
        in Paktika province;
Whereas between the election on August 20, 2009, and September 8, 2009, the ECC 
        has received a total of 2,842 election complaints; and
Whereas Grant Kippen, a Canadian and the chairman of the ECC, said the 
        irregularities found include ballots not being folded, meaning they 
        would not fit in a ballot box slot, identically marked ballots, and 
        overly large counts at polling stations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls for a runoff 
election between the two top finishers.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

James Larkin (2), et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-DJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant James Larkin’s Unopposed Motion to Amend 

Conditions of Release, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion and amending Defendant James Larkin’s 

conditions of release to remove the condition requiring location monitoring technology.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1574-1 Filed 04/14/23 Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ORNA MILLER
, Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2329

[ October 18, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Eli Breger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2013CA010264XXXXMB

.

Michael A. Levin of the Law Offices of Michael A. Levin, Weston, and Andrew M. Kassier of Andrew M. Kassier, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.

Brandon S. Vesely of Albertelli Law, Tampa, for appellee.

P E R C URIAM

.

I n this foreclosure proceeding w e affirm the denial of appellant’s post

judgment motion for sanctions against the appellee based on Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla. 1979) ( finding

that in the absence of an adequate record on appeal an appellate court must affirm an order or judgment). Although the parties filed a stipulation of facts, those facts do not show that the court abused its discretion in denying the motion. See Galasso v. Gar gione, 40 So. 3d 14 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Here, the stipulation contained no facts regarding whether the appellee paid previously awarded amounts of sanctions, one of the grounds upon which additional sanctions were sought. Further, the appellant accused t he bank of misconduct in proceeding with the loan foreclosure while the appellant was seeking modification and in refusing to give her a payoff figure for her loan. There is simply insufficient evidence

within the statement of facts or in this record to sh ow without dispute that the bank acted improperly, so that the denial of sanctions was an abuse

of discretion.

Affirmed.2 W ARNER
, L EVINE and B UCHANAN

, L AURIE E. , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 The charges against Blanton, Quintero, and Hall all arose

from the same incident. 

# FILED September 21, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) FOR PUBLICATION ) Appellee, ) FILED: ) v. ) HUMPHREYS COUNTY ) WILLIAME. HALL and ) HON. ALLENW. WALLACE, JUDGE DERRICK D. QUINTERO, ) ) NO. 01-S-01-9703-CC-00068 Appellants. )

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

I concur in the conc lus ion reached by the majority in this case except withrespect to the issue of proportionality. On that issue, the majority holds that the punishment of death is not disproportionate under the record in this case. I respectfully dissent, and I do so for the same reasons outlined in State v. Blanton , __ S.W.2d __ (Tenn. 1998), 1998 W.L. 310485 (Birch, J., dissenting).

In Blanton , no direct evidence was adduced that Blanton shot either victim or stabbed Mrs. Vester. The same analysis applies here--there is no direct evidence that Hall or Quintero shot either victim or stabbedMrs. Vester. 1 Thus, considering the factor of “the defendant[s’] involvement or role inthe murder[s],” the absence of direct evidence that either defendant was the actual killer compels my conclusion that the punishment of death is, in this case, disproportionate. See Tison v. Arizona , 481 U.S. 137,2

107 S. Ct. 1676, 95 L. Ed.2d 127 (1987)(discussing how a de fend ant’s role in a murder affects the sentencing decision); State v. Branam , 855 S.W.2d 563, 570-71 (Tenn. 19 93). I wo uld, accordingly, remand the cause for a new sentencing hearing.

___________________________________ ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., Justice
**CERTIFICATION OF					CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER					AND					CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO					18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO					SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Leah Balderson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reel Estate Services Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|            | (i)        | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2007 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                         |                                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                                                         | (ii)                                          | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                             |

|               | By:    | */s/ Leah Balderson              * |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |   |                                                                                                     |
|               | Name:  | Leah Balderson                                                                                           |
|     |   |                                                                                                     |
|               | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and                                                                              |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                  |
|     |   |                                                                                                     |
|               | Date:  | June 13, 2007                                                                                            |

----
Exhibit 10.38


 


Summary of Unwritten Compensation
Arrangements

Applicable to Named Executive Officers of Overstock.com, Inc.


 


The
Company is not a party to any written employment agreement with any of its
named executive officers.


 


Effective
January 1, 2009, the Company pays each of its named executive officers (as
defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K), other than its
President and its Chief Executive Officer, base salaries of $200,000 annually.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company pays its President, Jonathan E.
Johnson III, a base salary of $250,000 annually. The Company does not pay its
Chief Executive Officer, Patrick M. Byrne, any base salary.


 


The
Company did not pay any of its named executive officers any bonus for 2008. On February 17,
2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
approved a Company-wide 2009 bonus pool equal to 30% of the improvement in
contribution achieved in 2009 over 2008; subject to the authority of the
Compensation Committee to determine the employees or classes or other groups of
employees, if any, who may participate in any bonus payment. The named
executive officers are eligible to participate in the 2009 bonus pool. Bonus
pool payments, if any, are expected to be made in early 2010.


 


On January 13,
2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
approved restricted stock awards under the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
as follows:


 


	
  Name and Title

  	
   

  	
  Restricted

  Stock Units(1)

  	
   

  
	
  Patrick M.
  Byrne, Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Jonathan E.
  Johnson III, President

  	
   

  	
  15,600

  	
   

  
	
  Stormy Simon,
  Senior Vice President, Marketing and Customer Care

  	
   

  	
  16,000

  	
   

  
	
  David Chidester,
  Senior Vice President, Finance(2)

  	
   

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  
	
  Stephen Tryon,
  Senior Vice President, Logistics and Talent

  	
   

  	
  14,000

  	
   

  



 






(1)                                 Each
restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of
Overstock.com, Inc. common stock. The restricted stock units vest as to
25% at the close of business on the first anniversary of the date of grant, 25%
at the second anniversary of the date of grant , and the remaining 50% at the
third anniversary of the date of grant. Vested shares will be delivered
promptly after the restricted stock units vest.


 


 (2)                              Mr. Chidester
formerly served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Finance but as of  December 31, 2008 serves as the Company’s
Senior Vice President, Internal Reporting and Information.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 924 

Directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit to the House of Representatives copies of any document, record, memo, correspondence, or other 

communication of the Department of Defense, or any portion of such 

communication, that refers or relates to the trial or detention of Khalid 

Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarek Bin ’Attash, 

Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al 

Hawsawi. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2009 

Mr. MCKEON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit to the House 

of Representatives copies of any document, record, 

memo, correspondence, or other communication of the 

Department of Defense, or any portion of such communication, that refers or relates to the trial or detention 

of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih 

Mubarek Bin ’Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz 

Ali, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs 

2 the Secretary of Defense to transmit to the House of Rep3 resentatives, not later than 14 days after the date of the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 924 IH 

1 adoption of this resolution, copies of any document, 

2 record, memo, correspondence, or other communication of 

3 the Department of Defense, or any portion of such com4 munication, that refers or relates to the trial or detention 

5 of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih 

6 Mubarek Bin ’Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz 

7 Ali, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon Motion of the Defendant, with good cause appearing and with no objection 

from the Government, 

IT IS ORDERED granting Attorney Paul J. Cambria, Jr., leave to appear by 

[phone/videoconferencing] at the May 22, 2023 Hearing in this matter. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Paul J. Cambria, Jr. shall [call 602-

______/log in to the Court’s videoconferencing system at www._______________] at 

10:55 A.M. May 22, 2023. 

SO ORDERED this _______ day of ___________, 2023. 

 ___________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1582-1 Filed 05/09/23 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

HARRY BABINGER, II,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 23 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief 

is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,  George de Urioste, certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 10-K/T of Chordiant Software, Inc.; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this transitional report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thistransitional report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this transitional report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this transitional report; 

 

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this transitional report is being prepared; 

 

b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this transitional report, based on such evaluation; 

 

c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s third quarter in the case of a transition report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
#### Urschel *v.*Urschel et al.

(No. 22968

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*Mr. Charles O’Neil, Messrs. Rupp & Hahn*and *Messrs. Tracy, Chapman ds Welles,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Fraser, Iliett, Wall & Effler*and *Mr. Robert Newbegin,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.’

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.