alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Louis Vucci, Jr., Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: November 18, 2010/s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.
Louis Vucci, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Victor Petrone, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: November  18, 2010/s/ Victor Petrone
Victor Petrone
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 12

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060-2 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060-2 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 2
Amendment to Expatriate Assignment Agreement, effective as of December 1 , 2008



 Exhibit 10.40 
 [Avon Products, Inc. letterhead] 
 Personal & Confidential 
 November 7, 2008 
 Ben Gallina 
 Avon Products, Inc. 
 1345 Avenue of the Americas 
 New York, N.Y. 10105-0196 
 Dear Ben: 
 Reference is made to our letter to you dated April 6, 2006 regarding the tax equalization adjustment to be paid to you related to your London based assignment.

 U.S. income tax rules under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code set forth specific requirements for time of payment for the tax equalization
adjustments in order that you may avoid additional taxes on these payments. The purpose of this letter is to set forth the time of payment requirements so that your tax equalization adjustment will comply with Section 409A. Therefore, the
April 6, 2006 letter agreement is amended as follows. 
 Taxes 
 Any tax equalization payments made by Avon to you shall not exceed the taxes actually imposed by the U.K. on the compensation received from Avon over the taxes that would be imposed if the compensation were subject
solely to U.S. Federal, state and local income tax, plus the amount necessary to compensate for the additional taxes on the tax equalization payment. Any tax equalization payment shall be made no later than the end of the second calendar year
beginning after the year in which your U.S. Federal income tax return is required to be filed (including any extensions) for the year to which the compensation subject to the tax equalization payment relates, or, if later, the end of the second
taxable year beginning after the taxable year in which your U.K. tax return or payment is required to be filed or made for the year to which the compensation subject to the tax equalization payment relates. 
 Please acknowledge your agreement by signing and returning one copy of this letter to me. 
 [Signature page follows] 








			
	Sincerely,
	
	AVON PRODUCTS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kim K.W. Rucker

	Name:	 	Kim K.W. Rucker
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President and General Counsel


 Acknowledged and Agreed 
 this 1 day of December, 2008. 
  

	
	 /s/ Ben Gallina

	    Ben Gallina
	

  

 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of C.H., a child. ) ________________________________ ) ) K.C., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-1193 ) LUTHERAN SERVICES FLORIDA, ) INC., a Florida corporation; ) CHILDREN'S NETWORK OF ) SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida ) corporation; FLORIDA DEPARTMENT ) OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, an ) agency of the State of Florida; and ) OPERATION PAR, INC., ) ) Appellees. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 18, 2020. 

### Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Robert J. Branning, Judge. Stacie J. Schmerling and Howard M. Talenfeld of Talenfeld Law, Fort Lauderdale; Michael A. Bernstein of Michael A. Bernstein, P.A., Fort Lauderdale; and Richard A. Filson of Filson & Penge, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellant.- 2 -

Kayla A. Riera-Gomez of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Miami, and Andrew W. Feldman of Klein Glasser Park & Lowe, P.L., Miami, for Appellee Lutheran Services Florida, Inc. Eric J. Netcher of Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Orlando, and Joshua B. Walker of Walker, Revels, Greninger & Netcher, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellee Children's Network of Southwest Florida, LLC.
Julie C. Ireland and AnnMarie G. Flores of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellee Operation Par, Inc. No appearance for appellee Department of Children Families.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, 

### ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM , and 

### ATKINSON , JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 10.1





June 29, 2004







Consent of Independent Public Accounting Firm









The Board of Directors

RiT Technologies Ltd.

Tel Aviv

Israel





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of RiT Technologies Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-90750) of our report dated February 2, 2004 except for note 10, for which the date is June 21, 2004 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of RiT Technologies Ltd. as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in The Annual Report on Form 20-F of RiT Technologies Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.









S/SOMECH CHAIKIN

Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

(A member firm of KPMG International)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23 Consent

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Northway Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 18, 2001, relating
to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Northway Financial,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity,
comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000.

                                    /S/ Shatswell, Macleod & Company, P.C.
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 9, 2001
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of RadioOne, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Radio One, Inc., Radio One, Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Radio One, Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.**Registration Statements on Form S-3**   **File Number** **Date Filed**333-47762 October 11, 2000333-58436 April 6, 2001333-81622 January 29, 2002**Registration Statement on Form S-4**   **File Number** **Date Filed**333-65278 July 17, 2001**Registration Statements on Form S-8**     **Name** **File Number** **Date Filed**1999 Stock Option andRestricted Stock Plan 333-78123 May 10, 19991999 Stock Option and RestrictedStock Plan 333-42342 July 27, 20001999 Stock Option and RestrictedStock Plan 333-62718 June 11, 20011999 Stock Option and RestrictedStock Plan 333-100711 October 24, 2002Amended and Restated 1999 StockOption and Restricted Stock Plan 333-116805 June 24, 2004Amended and Restated EmploymentAgreement Between Radio One, Inc.and Scott R. Royster datedOctober 18, 2000 and Amended andRestated Employment AgreementBetween Radio One, Inc. and LindaJ. Eckard Vilardo dated October31, 2000 333-121726 December 29, 2004/s/Ernst& YoungLLPMcLean, Virginia
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15319]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 814]


Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone; Fort 
Myers, FL

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry 
of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and 
for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Lee County Port Authority (the Grantee) has made 
application to the Board (FTZ Docket 35-94, 59 FR 59398, 11/17/94), 
requesting the establishment of a foreign-trade zone at two sites in 
Fort Myers, Florida, at and adjacent to the Southwest Florida 
International Airport, a Customs user fee airport; and,
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register, and the Board adopts the findings and recommendations 
of the examiner's report and finds that the requirements of the Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the 
privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the 
records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 213, at the sites 
described in the application, subject to the Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject to the standard 
2,000-acre activation limit.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of June 1996.

Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Michael Kantor,
Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer.

    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15319 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Thomas Brice Velasco,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00394-001-TUC-CKJ (DTF)

REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION

The matter having come before the court on the alleged violation of supervised 

release, the defendant consenting to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction, and the court 

having considered the witnesses and exhibits offered by the parties, the court finds that the 

government established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated 

condition number one by committing the offense of possession of liquor on the Tohono 

O’Odham Nation. The court therefore recommends that the defendant’s supervised release 

be revoked.

That parties have fourteen days to file their objections.

Dated this 4th day of October, 2021.

Case 4:18-cr-00394-CKJ-DTF Document 137 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 1
----

**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING  FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement No. 333-126958 on Form S-8 of Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)  of our report on the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries  dated August 29, 2006 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes  an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of the new accounting standard  for stock based compensation, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.  123R, *Share-based Payment*), and our report dated August 29, 2006 on  management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting, both appearing in this annual report of the Company for the year  ended June 30, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche (South Africa)

**Chartered Accountants (SA)  Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa  August 29, 2006**

----
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 847 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any conference 

committee or other meetings held to determine the content of national 

health care legislation be conducted in public under the watchful eye 

of the people of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself, Mr. LANCE, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. LEE of 

New York, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. 

MCCARTHY of California, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. MACK, 

Mrs. BONO MACK, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. 

COLE, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. BUYER, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. 

TURNER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. 

WITTMAN, Mr. ISSA, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. PAUL, Mr. LATTA, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. SCHMIDT, 

Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. 

DREIER, Mr. SHUSTER, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. PETRI, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. HERGER, Mr. TERRY, Mr. CAMP, and Mr. 

HOEKSTRA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

any conference committee or other meetings held to determine the content of national health care legislation 

be conducted in public under the watchful eye of the 

people of the United States. 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 847 IH 

Whereas House rules allow conference committees to hold 

closed-door meetings that exclude the public and press; 

Whereas over the years, full transparency has not been the 

standard as conferees have met privately behind closed 

doors; 

Whereas in previous years, conferees have met in smaller 

rooms or private meetings and avoided full transparency; 

Whereas the New York Times has reported on a disturbing 

pattern of House leadership skirting open access by allowing small groups of conference committee members to 

meet privately; 

Whereas ABC News reported earlier this year that the $1 

trillion stimulus bill was passed after ‘‘closed-door negotiations’’; 

Whereas health care reform is one of the largest public policy 

reforms taken up by Congress in generations; 

Whereas health care reform will affect the lives of all people 

in the United States; 

Whereas health care constitutes one-sixth of the Nation’s 

economy; and 

Whereas Congress is elected by the people to serve the people: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, that it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that any conference committee or other meet3 ings held to determine the final content of sweeping na4 tional health care legislation be held in full public view 

5 and not behind closed doors. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15695]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-73-003]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

June 14, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 12, 1996, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), tendered for filing its Transportation Cost Rate 
Adjustment (TCRA) refund report related to the September 1, 1993 
through December 31, 1994 period.
    Tennessee states that it dispersed refunds, with interest, to its 
customers pursuant to Tennessee's January 30, 1996 compliance filing in 
the above referenced proceedings.
    Tennessee states that copies of the comprehensive refund report has 
been mailed to all affected state regulatory commissions and customers 
were served, along with their refunds, with detailed calculations 
supporting their refunded amount.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 21, 1996. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15695 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 754 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 754

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 14, 2009.
Whereas the members of the Army National Guard and Air National Guard of the 
        State of Pennsylvania reside throughout the State and come from various 
        communities, backgrounds, and professions;
Whereas units and members of the Pennsylvania National Guard have been deployed, 
        and are continuously being deployed, in support of United States 
        military operations at home and overseas in Iraq, Afghanistan, and 
        dozens of other countries;
Whereas one such unit, the 56th Brigade Combat Team (Stryker) of the 
        Pennsylvania Army National Guard, is composed of approximately 4,000 
        citizen-soldiers from throughout the State of Pennsylvania;
Whereas the 56th Brigade Combat Team (Stryker), following a mobilization and 
        deployment to Kosovo in 2003, was placed on Federal active duty for a 
        second overseas mobilization on September 19, 2008, and deployed to Iraq 
        on January 15, 2009;
Whereas during the deployment of the 56th Brigade Combat Team (Stryker) in Iraq, 
        the brigade was primarily engaged in convoy security, force protection, 
        provincial reconstruction, and base operations missions; and
Whereas the 56th Brigade Combat Team (Stryker) returned to the United States and 
        demobilized in September 2009, upon completion of one year of service in 
        support of military operations in Iraq: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its gratitude to the members of the Army National 
        Guard and Air National Guard of the State of Pennsylvania and their 
        families for their service and sacrifice on behalf of the United States;
            (2) commends the members of the 56th Brigade Combat Team (Stryker) 
        of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard on the completion of their most-
        recent deployment to Iraq; and
            (3) recognizes the achievements of the members of the 56th Brigade 
        Combat Team (Stryker), and all other formerly and presently deployed 
        Pennsylvania Army National Guard and Air National Guard units and 
        members, for their exemplary service.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                              JURISDICTION
----                                              ------------
<S>                                               <C>
Viasystems Technologies Corp.                     Delaware, U.S.A.
Viasystems Canada Inc.                            Quebec, Canada
Viasystems International, Inc.                    Delaware, U.S.A.
Viasystems Group Limited                          England and Wales, U.K.
Chips Acquisition Limited                         England and Wales, U.K.
Viasystems II Limited                             England and Wales, U.K.
Viasystems Tyneside Limited                       England and Wales, U.K.
PCB Investments plc                               England and Wales, U.K.
Viasystems Holdings Limited                       England and Wales, U.K.
Viasystems Selkirk Limited                        Scotland, U.K.
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40525

(Summary Calendar)

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR ANTONIO SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ, also known as

Edgar Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(USDC No. M-93-CR-178-02)

- - - - - - - - - -

September 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Edgar Antonio Santiago-Martinez appeals his guilty plea

conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

marijuana and his sentence. He argues that the district court

violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 in the taking of his guilty plea, and

that the district court failed to make the necessary reasonable
2

foreseeability finding in determining the quantity of marijuana for

which he was responsible. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 298 (5th

Cir. 1993) (en banc); United States v. Mergerson, 4 F.3d 337, 345

(5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1198 (1994). 

AFFIRMED.