alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15671]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 93-314; RM-8396]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Cadiz and Oak Grove, KY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Chief, Policy and Rules Division, denied the petition for 
reconsideration filed by Southern Broadcasting Corporation of the 
Chief, Allocations Branch's Report and Order, 60 FR 52105, October 5, 
1995, substituting Channel 293C3 for Channel 292A at Cadiz, reallotting 
Channel 293C3 from Cadiz to Oak Grove, Kentucky, and modifying Station 
WKDZ-FM's license accordingly. The Commission denied the petition 
because it failed to present new facts or arguments that were not 
considered in the Report and Order that would warrant a contrary 
decision. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 20, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Romano, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 93-314, adopted May 24, 
1996 and released June 7, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc. (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-15671 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Vincent T. Donnelly, President and Chief Executive Officer of PMA Capital
      Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the information contained in the Annual Report of PMA Capital Corporation
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of PMA Capital Corporation. A signed original of
      this
      written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
      and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
                Vincent T. DonnellyVincent
                T. DonnellyPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                13, 2007
Presidential Documents

30127

Federal Register

Vol. 61, No. 116

Friday, June 14, 1996

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 96–31 of June 6, 1996

Assistance Program for Russia

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 577 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and

Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1994 (Public Law 103–87), I hereby

certify that all of the armed forces of Russia and the Commonwealth of

Independent States have withdrawn from Latvia and Estonia or that the

status of those armed forces has been otherwise resolved by mutual agreement

of the parties.

You are authorized and directed to notify the Congress of this certification

and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, June 6, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–15341

Filed 6–13–96; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 808 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 808

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 8, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2647) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 2010 for military activities of the Department of 
Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department 
of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, to 
provide special pays and allowances to certain members of the Armed Forces, 
expand concurrent receipt of military retirement and VA disability benefits to 
disabled military retirees, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the conference report to its adoption without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
    Sec. 2.  Upon the adoption of the conference report the House shall be 
considered to have adopted the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 196) making 
corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2647.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Larry Walters, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Bank of America Corporation Short Term 

Disability Plan; Bank of America 

Corporation; Aetna Life Insurance 

Company, 

 Defendants. 

No. 2:18-cv-00906-SRB 

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing this action in its entirety with prejudice, 

each side to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 Dated this 3rd day of July, 2018. 

Case 2:18-cv-00906-SRB Document 15 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Dehmer *v.*Campbell et al.

(No. 23004

Decided March 2, 1932.)

*635*Mr. T. B. Mateer*and *Messrs. Knepper, White, Smith <$> Dempsey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Nelson Campbell*and *Mr. Benjamin Olds,*for defendants in error.

Stephenson, J.

This court is considering but one question, and that question is dispositive of the case, as the court views it.

The rule of Courts of Appeals requiring litigants in appeal eases to try their cases upon the transcript of the evidence taken in the trial court, supplemented by such additional oral evidence as the parties may present, has been considered by this court heretofore in the case of *Union Trust Co.*v. *Lessovitz,*122 Ohio St., 406, 171 N. E., 849.

This court sees no reason for departing from the law laid down in that case, and reiterates paragraph 8 of the syllabus of that case as the law of this case, as follows:

*636“While the practice of the appellate court, requiring appealed cases to be tried upon the transcript of the evidence in the trial court supplemented by such additional oral evidence as the parties may present, is commendable where court and counsel can agree, under the plenary grant of our constitution permitting the parties in chancery cases to be heard *de novo*on appeal, litigants have the right to submit their evidence to the appellate court under the same legal rules applicable in the trial courts. ’ ’

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that court for further hearing.

*Judgment reversed and cause remanded.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

ASHLEY ROXANNE HENDERSON,

Appellant CAUSE NO. 03

- 15 -00699- CR

TRIAL COURT NO. 9287

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID

COURT:

Now comes Ashley Roxanne Henderson, appellant in the above styled and numbered case, before the decision in this Court has been delivered, and respectfully moves this Court to withdraw appellant's notice of appeal and to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because she no longer wishes to pursue her appeal.

Approved Copeland Law Office

P.O. Box 399
Cedar Park, TX78613

512.215.8114 By: /s/Tim Copeland Tim Copeland

State Bar No. 04801500 Attorney for Appellant

R ACCEPTED
03-15-00699-CR

8264888
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
12/16/2015 1:44:19 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on the 16th day of December, 2015, a true and

correct copy of the above and foregoing docume nt was served on the County Attor ney's Office, Lampasas County, Texas, by facsimile transmission in accordance with the applicable rules of appellate and criminal procedure.

/s/ TimCopeland

Tim C opeland
#### The Northern Ohio Ry. Co. et al. *v.*The Cincinnati & Lake Erie Rd. Co.

(No. 23130

Decided November 18, 1931.)

*Mr. E. F. Wieser*and *Messrs. Squire, Sanders S Dempsey,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Martin <& Corry*and *Messrs. Cable & Cable,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert Copple

Robert Copple
Chief Financial Officer
  /s/ Carol Waldman

Name:  Carol WaldmanTitle:    Notary Public
#### Sandow *v.*City of Cincinnati.

(No. 22983

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*Mr. Sol Goodman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*city solicitor, *Mr. Francis T.*
      *657
      *Bartlett*andlifr. *Harry J. Wernke,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and tbe same is hereby, dismissed for tbe reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
M. Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
year ended November 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January
      14, 2010
            By:
            /s/ David
      M. MorseName:
      David M. Morse
              Title:
      Co-President and Chief Executive Officer





I,
Desiree Mejia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report of Location
Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended
November 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January
      14, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Desiree
      MejiaName:
      Desiree Mejia
              Title:
      Chief Operating Officer, Principal Financial
              Officer
      and Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            0
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          14,779
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        15,974
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               2,456,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,486,819
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       13,240
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              (259)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  12,981
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,216,014
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  246,300
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  11,524
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,486,819
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        8,304
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         332
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         332
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          7,972
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   7,972
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         8,231
<NET-INCOME>                                     (259)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        8,231
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           3,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Hudson Ins. Co. *v.*Yameen.

(No. 22509

Decided June 3, 1931.)

*647*Messrs. Matthetus <3 Matthews*and *Messrs. Mooney, Bibbee & Edmonds,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Marshall & Harlem,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that the insurance policy involved herein contains language reasonably susceptible to different interpretations and hence will be given the construction most favorable to the assured. *Farmers National Bank*v. *Delaware Insurance Co.,*83 Ohio St., 309; *Mumaw*v. *Western & Southern Life Insurance Co.,*97 Ohio St., 1; *Great American Mutual Indemnity Co.*v. *Jones,*111 Ohio St., 84.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
#### In re: Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Petitioner.

No. 03-6973.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 24, 2003.

Decided Aug. 25, 2003.

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Cornelius Tucker petitions for a writ of mandamus. He seeks an order disqualifying the magistrate judge and district judge.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. *See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *See In re United Steelworkers,*595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). We have reviewed the petition and conclude that Tucker does not meet the standard for *1001mandamus relief. Accordingly, although we grant Tucker’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            0
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     21,547
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         291,890
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        15,042
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               2,318,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,646,758
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       25,338
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              7,959
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  33,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,320,565
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  290,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,896
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,646,758
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                            0
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       7,068
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       7,068
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        (7,068)
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             197,537
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 190,469
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       182,240
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,229
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         296,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3




AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.

AND

RICHARD DAMION




Whereas, Richard Damion has provided Executive and Consulting services to INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. (“Corporation”) for the period from February 20, 2008 to date, expending over 1500 hours of his time, assuming the responsibilities and office of Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and acting as its Principle Employee, for which time and services he has not been compensated; and




Whereas, as a result of his activities and efforts, the Corporation has developed a new business plan and arranged strategic alliances to fulfill that plan, directing the Company toward new business operations in the Computer Technology and Equipment Manufacturer and Distribution Business; and




Whereas, at this date, the Corporation has no funds to pay in cash the compensation rightly due for these services fully rendered, and has only restricted stock which it might use to satisfy this debt;




Now, Therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective as of this 20th day of  February, 2009:




1.  Corporation hereby contracts to issue 52,000,000 shares of its Restricted Common Stock to Richard Damion, and Richard Damion hereby accepts said shares, in full satisfaction of the compensation owed to Richard Damion by Corporation for the consulting services  and officer services fully provided by Richard Damion to Corporation over the twelve month period ending February 20, 2009.




2.  The parties hereto further agree that since Corporation is in the process of amending its Articles of Incorporation to increase its authorized capital stock so that it can lawfully issue additional shares, and Corporation can not issue shares until said amendment is complete, that Corporation shall immediately amend its Articles to permit it to issue the shares provided for by this Agreement, and the parties further agree that by their execution of this Agreement, Corporation is bound to issue the aforesaid shares in full, as soon as its Articles are amended, and the shares so to be issued shall be deemed fully earned and vested as of the date of execution of this Agreement by the Parties hereto.




INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.





BY:  /s/MICHAEL LUTTON

          MICHAEL LUTTON, PRESIDENT







       /s/ RICHARD DAMION

           RICHARD DAMION