alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Drucker Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert Smiley, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:         /s/ Robert Smiley



Name:           Robert Smiley



Title:     Acting Chief Executive Officer



Date:     February 25, 2009





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Drucker Inc. and will be retained by Drucker Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]



---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32025-32026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15894]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-88, 109 Stat. 
803 (ICCTA), which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and took effect 
on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and 
transferred certain functions and proceedings to the Surface 
Transportation Board (Board). This notice relates to functions that 
are subject to Board jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11323-25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[STB Finance Docket No. 32904]


Genesee & Wyoming Inc., Continuance in Control Exemption, 
Pittsburg & Shawmut Railroad, Inc.

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board under 49 U.S.C. 10502 exempts from the prior 
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323, et seq., the continuance in 
control by Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. (GWI) of the Pittsburg & Shawmut 
Railroad, Inc. (P&S). GWI presently controls 10 Class III rail carriers 
located in six states. P&S was authorized to acquire lines owned by the 
Arthur T. Walker Estate Corporation (the Pittsburg & Shawmut Railroad 
Company, Red Bank Railroad Company and Mountain Laurel Railroad 
Company) pursuant to a notice of exemption in STB Finance Docket No.

[[Page 32026]]

32903 published at 61 FR 20551 on May 7, 1996.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on July 21, 1996. Petitions to 
stay must be filed July 1, 1996. Petitions to reopen must be filed by 
July 11, 1996.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 32904 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of all 
pleadings must be served on William P. Quinn, Gollatz, Griffin & Ewing, 
P.C., 213 West Miner Street, P.O. Box 796, West Chester, PA 19381-0796.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data Inc., 1201 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Room 2229, Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services at (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: June 6, 1996.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Simmons, and 
Commissioner Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15894 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAIN HERNANDEZ SERRANO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71738

Agency No. A097-354-771

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Cain Hernandez Serrano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

SEP 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71738

denial of a motion to reopen. Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002). 

We deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence

presented with the motion to reopen was insufficient to warrant reopening. See id.

(BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary,

irrational, or contrary to law”). Hernandez Serrano’s contention that the BIA did

not review all the evidence fails because he has not overcome the presumption that

the BIA reviewed the record. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th

Cir. 2006). It follows that his due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d

1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for a petitioner to prevail on a due

process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0823

_____________________________

JAMES THOMAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

February 1, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

James Thomas, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby cosent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-38462, 333-71525, 333-61223, 333-63889, and
333-48797) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-68794, 333-43904, 333-40770, 333-40772,
333-37959 and 333-38137) of RCN Corporation and its Subsidiaries of our report
dated March 1, 2002, except for Notes 13 and 20 as to which the date is March
25, 2002, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2002
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the quarterly report of University General Health System, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Hassan Chahadeh, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and I, Michael L. Griffin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Hassan Chahadeh    
|August 14, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | Hassan Chahadeh        
|                |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                |  |  | 
|                |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Michael L. Griffin 
|                |  |  |  |  |  | Michael L. Griffin     
|                |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



47
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Elisa Lauren Escarsega, 

Defendant.

No. 18-00156MJ-002 

DETENTION ORDER 

 On April 6, 2018, Elisa Lauren Escarsega (the “Defendant”) appeared before this 

Court on a Petition to Revoke Conditions of Release and submitted the issue to the Court. 

The Court considered the information provided to the Court in determining whether the 

Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(1): 

☐ There is probable cause to believe that the Defendant has committed a 

Federal, State, or local crime while on release. 

☒ There is clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant has 

violated the conditions of release. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2): 

☐ Rebuttable Presumption where Probable Cause to Believe Felony 

Committed on Pretrial Release. The Defendant has failed to rebut the 

presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will 

assure that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any 

other person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2) 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(providing that rebuttable presumption of dangerousness applies if 

there is probable cause to believe that while on release a defendant 

has committed a Federal, State, or local felony). 

☒ Flight Risk. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not flee. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); U.S. 

v. Gotti, 794 F.2d 773, 778 (2nd Cir. 1986) (holding that “findings 

made under section 3148(b) may be established by a preponderance of 

the evidence”). 

☐ Dangerousness. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any other 

person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); Gotti, 794 

F.2d at 778. 

☒ Compliance with Conditions. The Court finds by a preponderance of 

the evidence that the Defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition 

or combination of conditions of release. See 18 U.S.C. § 

3148(b)(2)(B); Gotti, 794 F.2d at 778. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 9th day of April, 2018. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Grand Motion, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: July 14, 2008 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00278-CR

RANDY JOE CAMP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 372nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1578449D)

August 15, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/24/2015 10:10:05 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23


                            [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG, LLP]

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Northwest Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
333-41984 (Form S-8), 333-85118 (Form S-8), and 333-46651 (Form S-8) of
Northwest Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated July 16, 2003, relating to the
consolidated statements of financial condition of Northwest Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, which report appears in the June
30, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northwest Bancorp, Inc.

Our report refers to a change, as of July 1, 2001, in Northwest Bancorp, Inc.'s
method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets resulting from business
combinations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations, SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, and SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial
Institutions - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB
Interpretation No. 9.


/s/ KPMG

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                                                           September 29, 2003
Exhibit 1

(Filed Under Seal)

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-1 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Larry F. Williams, certify that:

      1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by
           Form 10-K/A, of ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc.; and

      2.   Based on my knowledge, this report, as amended, does not contain any
           untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
           necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
           under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
           the period covered by this report.

Date: November 19, 2003                           /s/ Larry F. Williams
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                      Larry F. Williams
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>

I, Douglas A. Shumate, certify that:

      1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by
           Form 10-K/A, of ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc.; and

      2.   Based on my knowledge, this report, as amended, does not contain any
           untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
           necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
           under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
           the period covered by this report.

Date: November 19, 2003                      /s/ Douglas A. Shumate
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                 Douglas A. Shumate
                                   Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31525-31526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15709]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than July 5, 1996.

[[Page 31526]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Charles L. Spangler, Nixa, Missouri; to acquire an additional 30 
percent, for a total of 35 percent, of the voting shares of Bates 
County Bancshares, Inc., Rich Hill, Missouri, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Security Bank, Rich Hill, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 14, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-15709 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                            [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG, LLP]


                          Independent Auditor's Consent



The Board of Directors
Northwest Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
333-41984 (Form S-8), 333-85118 (Form S-8), and 333-46651 (Form S-8) of
Northwest Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated July 19, 2002, relating to the
consolidated statements of financial condition of Northwest Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002, which report appears in the June
30, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northwest Bancorp, Inc.

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 141, "Business Combinations," and certain provisions of
SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," as required for goodwill
and intangible assets resulting from business combinations consummated after
June 30, 2001.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
September 27, 2002