alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Remington Partners, Inc


Exhibit10.3




Remington Partners, Inc.

Trade Finance and Management

919 Sir Francis Drake Blvd. Suite 202

Kentfield, CA. 94904

Tel: 415-482-6625

Fax: 415-482-6590




Mark S. Litwin, President

Direct Line: 415-482-6561







Participation Certificate







This is to confirm that you are participating with Remington Partners, Inc. (Remington) in a loan made by Remington to Lamplighter Studios, Inc, a California corporation (Lamplighter). The salient features of the participation with Lamplighter are as follows:




1. The loan amount of this date is $150,000, and may be expanded at Remington’s discretion.  The loan agreement is dated January 9, 2009, was funded on                           , 2009 and is revolving and open ended, as against accepted receivables. The loan is documented in Remington’s name. Remington has taken a security interest on all of the company’s assets.




2. The note interest rate is 18% per annum and the rate paid to you is 14% per annum, with interest payable monthly as collected.  

3. Your contribution to the total loan is $12,500.  

4. This Participation will be secured by a security interest granted to one of one of the participants, in the account of Lamplighter, on behalf of all of the participants. A UCC filing on the Remington account of Lamplighter will cover this.







Remington hereby declares that it holds the Lamplighter account, for the benefit of itself and the Participants in proportion to the respective interests as set out above.




Remington declares and agrees that any receipt of cash will be received for and will be distributed to the Participants proratably as received.











As a Participant you agree that you shall be individually responsible for any and all Federal and State income taxes attributable to distributions. Similarly, you will bear your share of any losses should any occur, in proportion to your prorata share of the loan, and reimburse Remington for your prorata share of any out of pocket expenses (including any litigation costs) incurred in connection with the collection of the obligation of Lamplighter, should any be necessary.




Remington will utilize its best effort to service and collect the loan, but is not a surety or guarantor to you. Our relationship is that of co-participants. You also acknowledge that Remington has not made representations to you about the debtor or its financial condition, that your knowledge of those matters has been obtained from your own sources, and that you have made your own decision about the advisability of entering into this participation




This Participation Certificate is issued to Martin Wade.







Dated: as of January      , 2009




Remington Partners, Inc.




				
	By

	 

	 
	Mark S. Litwin


	 
	President


	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and agreed to:


	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Address:


	 
	 

	 

	 
	 

	 

	 
	 

	Social Security No.
#### Theresa HIRD, Appellant, v. Edward HIRD, Respondent.

No. WD 52240.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 3, 1996.

James J. Wheeler, Keytesville, for appellant.

Wayne E. Schirmer, Moberly, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Theresa Hird appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Randolph County modifying the visitation provisions of her divorce decree with Edward Hird. Perceiving no jurisprudential value in a published opinion, we enter this summary order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum opinion explaining our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.1

AMERICAN TONERSERV CORP.

2009 Compensation Plan

Job Title:  Sr. Vice President of Corporate Development & Strategy
----------

Position Purpose: Isolate acquisition targets, secure relationships and manage
the entire acquisition process with a supporting role throughout due diligence
and integration phases.

Key Responsibilities:
---------------------
     o    Maintain contact with existing acquisition targets
     o    Isolate and cultivate additional acquisition targets
     o    Participate in weekly and/or periodic pipeline meetings
     o    Limited travel for key meetings at the direction of the Company CEO or
          CFO

2009 Base Salary:  $24,000 annual base, paid on a bi-weekly basis
----------------

Deferred Bonus:
---------------
             $7,150 paid in February
             $7,150 paid in March
             $2,150 paid each month, April through December (9 months = $19,350)
             ------
             $33,650 total during 2009

Employee Benefits:
-----------------
     o    100% of employee benefits premium (Medical, Dental, Vision) paid, up
          to a maximum of $850 per month
     o    Reimbursement / direct payment for ATS business related Mobile Phone
          service
     o    Company laptop for ATS business use will be provided

Stock Options
-------------
     o    Existing Stock Option pool remains in-tact (4M shares @ $0.15 strike
          price with tiered vesting based on annualized revenue milestones)
     o    Upon termination from ATS for any reason, the term of employee's right
          to exercise the options will be extended to 12 months (Section 3. (b)
          of the Stock Option Agreement currently allows for 3 months)



February 1st, 2009                                           2/12/09
----------------------------                     -------------------------------
Effective Date                                             Today's Date



/s/ Ryan Vice                                     /s/ Andrew Beaurlne
Ryan Vice, CFO (Employer)                        Andrew Beaurline, (Employee)
#### The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. James Edward BROWN, Appellee.

No. 06-94-00038-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.

July 17, 1996.

Anne Wetherholt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, for appellant.

Hal E. Turley, Dallas, for appellee.

Before CORNELIUS, C.J., and GRANT and STARR, JJ.

OPINION ON REMAND

STARR, Justice.

This case comes to us on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In our original opinion, we reversed the trial court’s order suppressing the introduction into evidence of a brown paper sack containing crack cocaine. In granting the motion to suppress, the trial court necessarily found by implication that the sack was seized during an unlawful detention. We held that the trial court abused its discretion in maldng this finding because Brown abandoned the sack before the police took any action that could be characterized as an unlawful detention. *State v. Brown,*No. 06-94 — 00038-CR, slip op. at 5 (Tex.App.—Texarkana, Aug.24, 1994, n.w.h.)(not designated for publication).

On petition for discretionary review, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the case for our reconsideration in light of *State v. Carter,*915 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), and *DuBose v. State,*915 S.W.2d 493 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). The court in *Carter*and *DuBose*held that in reviewing a trial judge’s decision granting or denying a motion to suppress evidence, an appellate court is not to conduct a *de novo*review of the record, but is instead to limit its review of the trial court’s rulings, both as to the facts and the legal significance of those facts, to a determination of whether the trial court abused its discretion. *Carter,*915 S.W.2d at 505; *DuBose,*915 S.W.2d at 496.

Without conducting a *de novo*review of the record, we again hold that the trial court in this case abused its discretion in suppressing the evidence. Viewing the totality of the circumstances, and giving deference to the trial court’s role as to the credibility of witnesses, as well as the weight and legal significance of the facts before the court, the trial court’s conclusion that the sack was seized as the result or fruit of an unlawful detention falls so far outside the zone of reasonable disagreement as to constitute an abuse of discretion. *See DuBose,*915 S.W.2d at 496-97.

*723We hold that the evidence is admissible and remand the cause to the trial court for trial.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 636 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 636

      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession 
relating to the transfer or release of detainees held at Naval Station, 
             Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2009

Mr. Wolf submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession 
relating to the transfer or release of detainees held at Naval Station, 
             Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the United States.

    Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to transmit to the 
House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of the 
adoption of this resolution, copies of any document, memo, or 
correspondance of the Department of Justice, including the Federal 
Bureau of Investigations and United States Marshal Service, or any 
portion of any such document, memo, or correspondance, that refers or 
relates to--
            (1) any guidance, recommendations, or logistical 
        preparations made since January 20, 2009, for the transfer or 
        release of the detainees held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 
        Cuba, into the United States;
            (2) the identities of any detainees that have been cleared 
        for release into the United States and as any information about 
        the capture, detention, and threat assessment of such 
        detainees;
            (3) the countries that have been contacted by Government 
        officials to request their acceptance of detainees currently 
        held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and
            (4) the legal guidance regarding the transfer, detention or 
        release of detainees held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 
        Cuba, into the United States.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JESUS E. TACORONTE a/k/a JESUS )

TACORONTE, )

)

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4597

)

CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST )

INC., ASSET-BACKED PASS-THROUGH )

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-AMC1, )

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS )

TRUSTEE; JESUS E. TACORONTE a/k/a )

JESUS TACORONTE, TRUSTEE UNDER )

THE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED THE )

25 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 KNOWN )

AS TRUST NUMBER 12726A; PANTHER )

TRACE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, )

INC.; UNKNOWN TENANT IN )

POSSESSION 1; and UNKNOWN )

TENANT IN POSSESSION 2, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough 

County; Laurel M. Lee, Judge.

Tanner Andrews of Tanner Andrews, P.A., 

DeLand, for Appellant.

Charles P. Gufford and Nicholas J. 

Vanhook of McCalla Raymer Liebert 
- 2 -

Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee 

Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 10.E






Exhibit 10.e




OTHER COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




     In order to assure that the Company’s senior executives are fully aware of the tax, legal and
financial implications of the Company’s benefit programs, the Company has established a program to
provide senior executives with assistance in their estate, financial and tax planning matters.
Under this program, the Company will pay up to $10,000 for such professional services each year,
with a special “carry-forward” of the second year’s $10,000 allowance during the first year to
cover additional costs associated with development of an initial estate and financial plan. The
Company will inform each participant during the course of this process as to the amount of
professional fees allocated to services performed on such participant’s behalf under the program.
The value of any such services received will be taxable as ordinary income to the participant.



     The Company does not provide automobiles for its executive officers but they are permitted to
have a personal vehicle insured, without charge, under the Company’s automobile insurance program.



     The Company’s executive officers are permitted to utilize certain Company facilities and
equipment for personal purposes, if available.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William UusiheimalaPrincipal
      Executive OfficerAugust
            12, 2010
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

David Getzen, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

State of Arizona, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. CV-18-8039-PCT-SRB (DMF) 

ORDER 

 Getzen has moved for a transfer to a federal prison (Doc. 15), to be released from 

custody (Doc. 17), and for the appointment of advisory counsel for his habeas 

proceedings (Doc. 19). This Court does not oversee prison operations and does not 

appoint advisory counsel. Accordingly, these motions will be denied. 

 Respondents have informed the Court that Getzen’s post-conviction proceedings 

are still pending in the Arizona Court of Appeals. (Doc. 19) The Court will stay these 

proceedings until the conclusion of the state proceedings. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying David Getzen’s Motion to be 

Transferred to a U.S. Federal Prison. (Doc. 15) 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying David Getzen’s Motion to be Released 

from Custody. (Doc. 17) 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying David Getzen’s Motion to Appoint 

Counsel. (Doc. 18) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that David Getzen’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Corpus is stayed pending the outcome of his state court proceedings in Yavapai County 

Superior Court case number CR 201780472. Accordingly, Respondents’ motion to stay 

the deadline to answer his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted. (Doc. 19) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that every 120 days from the date of this Order, 

Respondents will inform the Court of the status of David Getzen’s proceedings in state 

court. Further, Respondents will notify the Court within 30 days after the mandate is 

issued in that case by either the Arizona Court of Appeals or the Arizona Supreme Court. 

 Dated this 13th day of August, 2018.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America

Plaintiff,

v.

Andrew Padilla,

Defendant.

CR-18-00422-06-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

Upon motion of Defendant and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant Andrew Padilla’s motion to appear by telephone

or video teleconference at the Final Pretrial Conference in this case (Doc. ). Instructions will

be provided for his remote appearance by separate e-mail notification. 

Dated this Day of July, 2023.

 

 Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

 United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1644-1 Filed 07/24/23 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29446-29447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14572]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Research and Development Programs Meeting Agenda

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the agenda for a public meeting at which 
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will 
describe and discuss specific research and development projects.

DATES AND TIMES: As previously announced, NHTSA will hold a public 
meeting devoted primarily to presentations of specific research and 
development projects on June 12, 1996, beginning at 1:30 p.m. and 
ending at approximately 5 p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the Royce Hotel-Detroit Metro 
Airport, 31500 Wick Road, Romulus, MI 48174.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice provides the agenda for the 
thirteenth in a series of public meetings to provide detailed 
information about NHTSA's research and development programs. This 
meeting will be held on June 12, 1996. The meeting was announced on May 
15, 1996 (61 FR 24528). For additional information about the meeting 
consult that announcement. Starting at 1:30 p.m. and concluding by 5:00 
p.m., NHTSA's Office of Research and Development will discuss the 
following topics:

The process and priorities for coordinated global research,
Objectives and deliverables of vehicle aggressivity and fleet 
compatibility research with results and conclusions to date,
Research to upgrade fuel system integrity, including recent testing and 
possible alternative test configurations,
Integrated seat research,
Biomechanics research program
--Head and neck injury research
--Lower extremity research and new dummy hardware,
Children and child restraint/air bag interaction dummy testing.

    NHTSA has based its decisions about the agenda, in part, on the 
suggestions

[[Page 29447]]

it received by May 24, 1996, in response to the announcement published 
May 15, 1996.
    As announced on May 15, 1996, in the time remaining at the 
conclusion of the presentations, NHTSA will provide answers to 
questions on its research and development programs, where those 
questions have been submitted in writing by 4:15 p.m. on June 3, 1996, 
to William A. Boehly, Associate Administrator for Research and 
Development, NRD-01, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 
Washington, DC 20590. Fax number: 202-366-5930.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita I. Gibbons, Staff Assistant, 
Office of Research and Development, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, 
DC 20590. Telephone: 202-366-4862. Fax number: 202-366-5930.

    Issued: June 5, 1996.
William A. Boehly,
Associate Administrator for Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 96-14572 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 957 

Honoring Jimmie Johnson, 2009 NASCAR Sprint Cup Champion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2009 

Mr. MCHENRY (for himself, Mr. KISSELL, Mr. HUNTER, Mrs. MYRICK, and 

Mr. SCHAUER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Jimmie Johnson, 2009 NASCAR Sprint Cup 

Champion. 

Whereas Jimmie Kenneth Johnson, born in El Cajon, California, and a resident of Charlotte, North Carolina, successfully defended his Sprint Cup Championships from 

2006, 2007, and 2008; 

Whereas Jimmie Johnson becomes the first driver in 

NASCAR history to win the Sprint Cup Championship in 

4 consecutive seasons, surpassing the previous record of 

3 straight by Cale Yarborough; 

Whereas Jimmie Johnson’s #48 Lowe’s Chevrolet is backed 

by the finest team in motorsports, including Crew Chief 

Chad Knaus, Team Owner Rick Hendrick, and Car 

Owner, and racing legend Jeff Gordon; 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 957 IH 

Whereas Jimmie Johnson’s life story is the embodiment of 

the American dream, rising from humble roots to the pinnacle of his profession; 

Whereas Jimmie Johnson and his wife Chandra founded the 

Jimmie Johnson Foundation to provide assistance to disadvantaged children in pursuit of their dreams; 

Whereas Jimmie Johnson, now regarded as perhaps the 

greatest driver in the sport’s history, is universally regarded as humble and gracious, unaffected by the enormity of his achievements; and 

Whereas Jimmie Kenneth Johnson’s remarkable contributions to NASCAR and the communities of El Cajon, California, and Charlotte, North Carolina: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the historic achievements of Jimmie Kenneth Johnson and 

3 the #48 Lowe’s Chevrolet team. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 1 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 2 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 3 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 4 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 5 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 6 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 7 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 8 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 9 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 10 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 11 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 12 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 13 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 14 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 15 of 16

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1311   Filed 09/14/21   Page 16 of 16
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No.  333-45949, File No. 333-68855, File No. 333-77111, File
No. 333-73240 and File No. 333-86796) and Form S-3 (File  No. 333-84764) of PMA Capital
Corporation of our report dated February 5, 2003, relating to the 2002 and 2001
consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.  We also consent to
the incorporation by  reference of our report dated February 5, 2003 relating to the 2002
and 2001 financial statement schedules, which  appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPhiladelphia, PAMarch 12, 2004