alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12562]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior Department.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for the forthcoming meeting of 
the Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).
MEETING DATE, TIME, and ADDRESSES: Monday, June 24, 1996; 2 to 4 p.m., 
Innerwest Priority Board conference room, 1024 West Third Street, 
Dayton, Ohio 45407.

AGENDA: This business meeting will be open to the public. Space and 
facilities to accommodate members of the public are limited and persons 
accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The Chairman will 
permit attendees to address the Commission, but may restrict the length 
of presentations. An agenda will be available from the National Park 
Service, Midwest Region, 1 week prior to the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Gibson, Superintendent, Dayton 
Aviation, National Park Service, P.O. Box 9280, Wright Brothers 
Station, Dayton, Ohio 45409, or telephone 513-225-7705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission was 
established by Public Law 102-419, October 16, 1992.

    Dated: May 6,1996.
William W. Schenk,
Field Director, Midwest Field Area.
[FR Doc. 96-12562 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
6 

7 

8 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

9 United States of America, 

10 Plaintiff, 

11 V. 

12 Michael Lacey, et al., 

13 Defendants. 

14 

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH 

MINUTE ORDER RE: EXHIBITS 

15 CERTIFICATION OF TRIAL EXHIBITS FOR JURY DELIBERATION 

16 I/We have reviewed the trial exhibits to be presented to the Jury during the 17 deliberations and find that they are accurate. 18 

19 

20 

21 22 23 24 25 

26 27 28 

DATE: il j P1

/

2

01..J 

' 

DATE: l l ' L . -i ) 

DATE: f I±/?) I DAT

E: t' / 6 1 / un.:J 

DATE: (•/o:t / 1-oJ,,J 

Attorney(s) for Plaintiff 

, endant Spear 

--------- ::> 

At 

7
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AFC Enterprises, Inc. (the "Corporation")
for the period ended December 29, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

Date:  December 15, 2003
                                                   /s/ Frank J. Belatti
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Frank J. Belatti
                                                   Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), John LaBoskey,
the Chief Financial Officer of BEI Technologies, Inc. (the Company) hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 27, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
32.2 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operations of
the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated
    
    December 8, 2003


/s/ John LaBoskeyJohn LaBoskeyChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31,1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                       712
<INVENTORY>                                     12,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,157
<PP&E>                                         838,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,026,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,274
<BONDS>                                        581,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,026,068
<SALES>                                        158,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               451,349
<CGS>                                           62,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   615
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,950
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,332
<EPS-BASIC>                                     23,332
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   23,332


</TABLE>
Exhibit R

Filed Under Seal

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-19 Filed 11/01/21 Page 1 of 1
AMENDED

DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: September 15, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg and Gopi 

K. Panchapakesan, Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant 

Padilla, present; Joy M. Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 7):

8:33 a.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion held re: Exhibits. The Court rules as set forth on the record.

9:04 a.m. Recess.

9:16 a.m. Court reconvenes. 9:18 a.m. Jury present. Carl Ferrer examined further. Exhibits 1021, 616a, 

73, 643, 605, 1611, 630, 633, 637, and 638 are admitted. 10:39 p.m. Jury exits. 10:40 a.m. Recess.

11:03 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 1062, 1062a, 

1052(b)(1), 641, 644, 645, 646, 647, 647a-e, 1612b, and 684a are admitted. 12:31 p.m. Jury exits 

courtroom. Discussion held: re: Exhibits. Ms. Bertrand renews the oral Motion for a Mistrial. 

Argument heard. IT IS ORDERED denying the oral Motion for Mistrial. 12:46 p.m. Court in recess 

until Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.

Court Reporter Elaine Cropper

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 8:33 AM

Stop: 12:46 PM

Total: 3hrs 38min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1800 Filed 09/15/23 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH I FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH I Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2008



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)




34
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of GetPokerRakeBack.com, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), Hai Yan Huang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to her knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

July 14, 2009

By: /s/ Hai Yan Huang 
Hai Yan Huang 
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GetPokerRakeBack.com and will be retained by GetPokerRakeBack.com and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its  staff upon request.]

---
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0460

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON LEE BLACK,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Heather M. Perry , Distr ict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024
Case Number: DA 22-0460
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sally Holdings LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary G. Winterhalter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:                          | /s/ Gary G.   Winterhalter |
|--------|------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   | Gary G. Winterhalter         |
|   | Chief Executive   Officer of |
|   | Sally Holdings LLC           |

 

 

May 5, 2011

 

----
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner v. John F. FAUST, Jr., Respondent.

No. 95-SC-127-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

April 20, 1995.

ORDER OF SUSPENSION FOR 59 DAYS

Pursuant to SCR 3.165, this Court has considered the report and opinion of the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association and the petition of the Inquiry Tribunal that John F. Faust, Jr. of Hazard, Kentucky should be suspended from the practice of law for 59 days and be required to return the unearned portion of his fee before requesting reinstatement and be further ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding in the amount of $1,475.12.

The disciplinary proceeding herein was initiated upon a complaint by the wife of a client that Faust was paid an advance retainer fee of $5,000 to prosecute an appeal in a criminal case for the complainant’s husband. The services of Faust were terminated after he filed a notice of appeal and designation of record. Faust failed to refund the unearned portion of the fee and he failed to timely surrender his case file and material to the client or successor counsel in violation of SCR 3.130-1.16(d).

The decision of the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association is adopted.

It is hereby ORDERED that John F. Faust, Jr. of Hazard, Kentucky is suspended from the practice of law for 59 days and is required to return the unearned portion of his fee before requesting reinstatement and is further ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding in the amount of $1,475.12.

All concur.

ENTERED: April 20, 1995.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens

Chief Justice
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1 (G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 30 2000

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

HENRY L. RUDOLPH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

vs.

HANK GALETKA,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 00-4099

(D.C. No. 99-CV-371)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, KELLY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Rudolph, an inmate appearing pro se, seeks to appeal the district

court’s remand order, again dismissing his habeas petition without prejudice for

failure to exhaust all of his federal claims in state court. We had remanded the

case to the district court for consideration of 28 U.S.C. 2254(b)(2), which allows

a federal district court to deny, but not grant, unexhausted habeas claims, as an
- 2 -

alternative to the dismissal of a mixed petition . See Rudolph v. Galetka , No. 99-

4207, 2000 WL 293706, at *2 (10th Cir. Mar. 21, 2000). On remand, the district

court concluded that petitioner raised colorable federal claims that were

unexhausted and were not easily resolvable, at least not without a review of trial

and appellate court records. See I R. doc. 27 at 2; doc. 25 at 6.

On appeal, Mr. Rudolph urges the merits of his claims and argues that

exhaustion would be futile and that obvious structural errors suggest dispensing

with the exhaustion requirement. Mr. Rudolph’s conclusory and somewhat

inflammatory statements do not demonstrate that exhaustion should be excused. 

See Duckworth v. Serrano , 454 U.S. 1, 4 (1981). We cannot say the district court

abused its discretion in requiring exhaustion, having found colorable federal

claims. See Lambert v. Blackwell , 134 F.3d 506, 515 (3rd Cir. 1997).

In view of the remand inviting the district court to consider 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(b)(2) and the same disposition on remand, we GRANT a certificate of

appealability, see Slack v. McDaniel , 120 S. Ct. 1595, 1604 (2000); Paredes v.

Atherton , No. 00-1016, 2000 WL 1289022 (10th Cir. Aug. 28, 2000), and

AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal without prejudice. All other pending 

motions are denied.
- 3 -

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Wilson Cheung



Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer

February 16, 2007
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








The
undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation
(the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended February 29, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.











/s/James B.
Wiegand___________________________
 James B.
Wiegand


Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


April 14,
2008
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 832 

Recognizing and congratulating ACT, Inc. on 50 years of service to the 

Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Mr. LOEBSACK (for himself, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. KING of Iowa, 

and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and congratulating ACT, Inc. on 50 years of 

service to the Nation. 

Whereas ACT, Inc., formerly known as American College 

Testing, is a not-for-profit entity dedicated to helping 

people achieve educational and workplace success; 

Whereas since its founding in 1959 in Iowa City, Iowa, ACT, 

Inc. has served this mission for 50 years; 

Whereas ACT has representatives from all 50 States participating in its State organizations; 

Whereas ACT conducts research on college and career readiness solutions to help all students graduate high school 

ready for college and workforce training programs; and 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 832 IH 

Whereas ACT is committed to bridging barriers that remain 

in accessing the globalized marketplace: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates ACT, Inc. on 50 years of 

3 service to the Nation; and 

4 (2) congratulates ACT employees, directors, 

5 and members of State organizations for their dedica6 tion in providing assistance to those in the Nation 

7 and around the world to achieve educational and 

8 workforce success. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

2AO 435

AZ Form (Rev. )

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

APPEAL CRIMINAL

NON-APPEAL CIVIL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

OTHER (6SHFLI\)

VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

OPINION OF COURT

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

SENTENCING

BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS  

PAPER COPY

3')HPDLO

$6&,,HPDLO

14 DAYS  

7 DAYSH[SHGLWHG  

DAILY

 

HOURLY

 

REALTIME

 

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025(7+$121()250$7,

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Peter S. Kozinets 602-514-7500 May 4, 2021

U.S. Attorney's Office

40 N. Central Ave., Ste. 1800 Phoenix AZ 85004

CR-18-00422-SMB Susan M. Brnovich 5/3/2021 5/3/2021

USA v. Lacey et al Phoenix AZ

✔

✔

Oral Argument re Doc. 940 5/3/2021

✔

✔

peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov

s/Peter S. Kozinets

5/4/2021

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1153 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Robert Francis Krebs,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00263-001-TUC-JGZ (JR)

ORDER 

Having considered the Government’s sealed Motion to Preclude the Insanity 

Defense (Doc. 130), the Defendant’s Response (Doc. 136), and the Defendant’s sealed 

Proffer (Doc. 146), for the reasons stated in the Sealed Order at Doc. 150, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion in Limine to Preclude the Insanity Defense (Doc. 

130) is GRANTED. Defendant is precluded from asserting an insanity defense at trial. 

Dated this 26th day of February, 2020.