alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1


                             CYBERIAN OUTPOST, INC.

                         Computation of Loss per Share
                     (In thousands, except per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended           Years Ended
                                                       ------------------------  ------------------------
                                                        2/29/2000    2/28/1999    2/29/2000    2/28/1999
                                                       ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Basic:
 Net loss............................................  $   (9,825)  $   (7,815)  $  (35,616)  $  (25,220)
 Accretion of premium on preferred stock.............           -            -            -         (210)
 Dividends applicable to preferred stockholders......           -            -            -         (613)
                                                       ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
 Net loss applicable to common stockholders..........  $   (9,825)  $   (7,815)  $  (35,616)     (26,043)
                                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
 Basic weighted average common shares
  outstanding........................................      23,697       22,748       23,382       15,886
                                                       ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
 Basic net loss per common share.....................  $    (0.41)  $    (0.34)  $    (1.52)  $    (1.64)
                                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Diluted:
 Net loss applicable to common stockholders..........  $   (9,825)  $   (7,815)  $  (35,616)  $  (26,043)
 Diluted weighted average common shares
  outstanding........................................      23,697       22,748       23,382       15,886
                                                       ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
 Diluted net loss per common share...................  $    (0.41)  $    (0.34)  $    (1.52)  $    (1.64)
                                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Pro forma basic and diluted:
 Pro forma net loss applicable to common
  stockholders.......................................  $  (9,825)   $  (7,815)   $ (35,616)   $  (25,220)

 Basic and diluted weighted average shares
  outstanding........................................      23,697       22,748       23,382       20,312
                                                       ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
 Basic and diluted pro forma net loss per common
  share..............................................  $    (0.41)  $   (0.34)   $    (1.52)  $    (1.24)
                                                       ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 5 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk April 5 , 2019

156189(6 5 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 156189

v COA: 332190

Saginaw CC: 15

- 041848

- FC

TRAVIS TRAVON SAMMONS,

Defendant

- Appellant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing i t s supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplem ental brief will be accepted as

timely filed if submitted on or before April 19, 2019

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard M. Lerner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 26, 2008 |  | /s/ Richard M. Lerner  
|               |  | Richard M. Lerner      
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

FEB 24 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

WELLINGTON SPENCER COPPESS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CHARLES L. RYAN, Director; 

RICHARD PRATT, Assistant Director; 

CORIZON CORRECTIONAL 

HEALTH, INC., named as Corizon 

Health Inc.; BENJAMIN SCHMID, 

Facility Health Administrator; 

CORIZON HEALTH, INC., 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

No. 20-15295

D.C. No. 4:18-cv-00118-JAS

U.S. District Court for Arizona, 

Tucson

TIME SCHEDULE ORDER

The parties shall meet the following time schedule.

Fri., April 24, 2020 Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record 

shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 

9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

Tue., May 26, 2020 Appellees' answering brief and excerpts of record 

shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 

9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within 21 days of 

service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in 

automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. 

Case 4:18-cv-00118-JAS Document 66 Filed 02/24/20 Page 1 of 2
Appellants without representation of counsel in a prisoner appeal may have 

their case submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument, 

pursuant to FRAP 34(a).

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Janne Nicole Millare Rivera

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 4:18-cv-00118-JAS Document 66 Filed 02/24/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David BergerDavid
      BergerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      11, 2009
1 Filed 10/30/14 Pride v. Super. Ct. CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELL ATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DAVID C. PRIDE, Petitioner,

v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. E061385 (Super.Ct.No . SCR57051)

OPINION

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for wr it of mandate. Annemarie G. Pace, Judge. Petition granted in part with directions. David C. Pride, in pro. per, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Michael A. Ramos, District Attorney, and Stephanie H. Ze itlin, Deputy District Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.2 In this matter we have reviewed the petition and the opposition filed by real party

in interest. We have determined that reso lution of the matter involves the application of settled principles of law, and that issuance of a peremptory writ in the first instance is therefore appropriate. ( Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 178.)

DISCUSSION There is no requirement in In re Steele (2004) 32 Cal.4th 682 ( Steele ) that a defendant seeking discovery under Penal Code section 1054.9 prove that he or she has an actual, physical petition for writ of habeas corpus waiting for the “final touches.” All that is required is that such a petition be in some state of preparation ( Steele , at p. 691; Curl v. Superior Court (2006) 140 Cal.A pp.4th 310.) The petition is not inadequate in this respect. Although petitioner may not be en titled to all items sought, his request has sufficient specificity and clarity and Kennedy v. Superior Court (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 359 does not apply. Nor do the cases require a defendant to articulate his or her theories of relief before obtaining the statutory discov ery. Finally, we decl ine to hold that the absence of a proof of service of the demand le tters to trial counsel invalidates petitioner’s request. Hence, we can find no basis for the tria l court’s flat denial of the motion for discovery.3 DISPOSITION Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandate is granted in part. Let a peremptory writ of mandate issue directing the Superior Court of San Bernardino County to vacate its order summarily denying the request for disc overy, and to reconsider the motion with respect to each category of items requested. The court may request such further briefing as it deems appropriate. Petitioner is directed to prepare and have the peremptory writ of mandate issued, copies served, and the original filed with the clerk of this court, to gether with proof of service on all parties.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

KING J. We concur:

McKINSTER Acting P. J.

MILLER J.
#### James I. and Angela KINWORTHY, Respondents, v. Ralph and Evelyn WHEAT, Appellants.

No. WD 47447.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Decided Aug. 17, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 28, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 26, 1993.

Ralph Wheat, pro se.

John W. Ellinger, Jefferson City, for respondents.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendants appeal denial of motion to set aside judgment.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jason Dussault, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dussault Apparel
      Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Dussault Apparel Inc.                                                                

Dated: September 14, 2009



| | /s/
      Jason Dussault             
| | -------------------------------------
| | Jason Dussault                       
| | Chief Executive Officer and President
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        
| | Dussault Apparel Inc.                

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dussault
Apparel Inc. and will be retained by Dussault Apparel Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                   KSL RECREATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


KSL Claremont Resort, Inc.
KSL Desert Resorts, Inc.
KSL Florida Holdings, Inc.
KSL Florida Development Corporation
KSL Georgia Holdings, Inc.
KSL Golf Holdings, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Holdings, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Land, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Realty, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Resort, Inc.
KSL Grand Wailea Hospitality Corporation
KSL Grand Wailea Resort, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings I, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings II, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings III, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings IV, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings V, Inc.
KSL Hotel Corp.
KSL La Quinta Corporation
KSL Lake Lanier, Inc.
KSL Lake Chabot, Inc.
KSL Real Estate Company
KSL Resorts Group, Inc.
KSL Silver Properties, Inc.
KSL Water Works, Inc.
Las Casitas Corporation
#### SCOTT RICE OF KANSAS CITY, INC., Appellant, v. APPLIED RESOURCES, INC., Respondent.

No. WD 50632.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 24, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 5, 1995.

Rodger J. Walsh, Independence, for appellant.

Gregory L. Musil, Kansas City, for respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County; Gack E. Gant, Judge.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., SMART, J., and TURNAGE, Senior Judge.

Appeal by Scott Rice, Inc. of a judgment entered on a counterclaim filed by Applied Resources, Inc. in the amount of $45,753.53 for breach of contract.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Maribel Felix, 

 Defendant. 

No. CR-17-01689-001-PHX-SMM

ORDER 

 On September 21, 2018, Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf issued "Findings and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Upon a Plea of Guilty and Order." Magistrate 

Judge Metcalf recommends to the District Court that this Judge accept the Defendant's 

plea of guilty, subject to the Court's acceptance of the Plea Agreement. Having reviewed 

this matter de novo, and no objections having been filed pursuant to 28 USC § 636(b)(1), 

the Court accepts the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Metcalf. 

 Accordingly, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED accepting the Defendant's plea of guilty. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plea agreement will not be accepted or 

rejected at this time but the matter will be referred to the Probation Office for report and 

recommendation. In this connection, the Defendant may be interviewed by the Probation 

/// 

/// 

/// 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

officer and the Court will inspect the presentence report for the purpose of determining 

whether to accept or reject the plea agreement. 

Dated this 19th day of October, 2018. 

Honorable Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tan Wan Geng, President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 29, 2011
By:
/s/ Tan Wan GengName: Tan Wan GengTitle: President





* This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sonterra Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sherry L.
      Spurlock, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: February
                  14, 2008
              /s/
                  Sherry L.
                  Spurlock
                Sherry
                  L. Spurlock, Chief Financial
                  Officer
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CARLOS CHAVEZ-FLORES

VERSUS

OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE

COMPANY

NO. 2023 CW 0518

AUGUST 14, 2023

In Re: Ohio Security Insurance Company, applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 698602. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DISMISSED. Defendant/Relator, Ohio Security Insurance

Company, filed a motion to withdraw its writ application based

upon a settlement confected between Defendant, Ohio Security

Insurance Company, and Plaintiff, Carlos Chavez-Flores, on June

21, 2023. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

PMc

CHH

SMM
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14986]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket No. PY-95-002]


Tentative Voluntary Poultry Grade Standards

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; extension of test-market period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 12, 1995, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) 
published a notice in the Federal Register (60 FR 30830) announcing a 
one-year test-market period for USDA grade identified raw ready-to-cook 
boneless-skinless poultry products without added ingredients, based on 
tentative grade standards. AMS is extending the test-market period 
beyond its scheduled end, June 12, 1996, until it makes a final 
determination about the tentative standards.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rex A. Barnes, Acting Chief, Grading 
Branch, Poultry Division, 202-720-3271.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 12, 1995, the Agricultural Marketing 
Service (AMS) published a notice in the Federal Register (60 FR 30830) 
announcing a one-year test-market period for USDA grade identified raw 
ready-to-cook boneless-skinless poultry products without added 
ingredients, based on tentative grade standards. The test-market period 
is scheduled to end June 12, 1996, after which AMS will evaluate the 
test results. If AMS decides to amend the current poultry grade 
standards, a proposal with comment period will be published in the 
Federal Register. To allow processors to continue grade identifying 
these products while the Agency evaluates test results, AMS has 
determined that it is appropriate to extend the test-market period 
until a final determination is made about the tentative grade 
standards.

    Dated: June 7, 1996.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-14986 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15796]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Open 
Meeting

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserve Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Advisory Council was established in December 1993 to 
advise NOAA's Sanctuaries and Reserves Division regarding the 
management of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. The Advisory 
Council was convened under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act.

TIME AND PLACE: Friday, June 28, 1996 from 9:30 until 4:00 at the 
Cambria Pines Lodge, 2905 Burton Drive, Cambria, California.

AGENDA: General issues related to the Monterey Bay National Marine 
Sanctuary are expected to be discussed, including an update from the 
Sanctuary Manager; reports from the working groups; presentations on 
the Cambria desalination plant, elephant seal management plan, and 
Morro Bay Estuary Foundation; reviews of the Advisory Council's annual 
report; and a report on management programs for the northern region of 
the Sanctuary.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Seats 
will be available on a first-come, first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Delay at (404) 647-4246 or 
Elizabeth Moore at (301) 713-3141.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program)

    Dated: June 12, 1996.
David L. Evans,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal 
Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 96-15796 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M