alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China
Southern Airlines Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xiao Li Xin, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 30, 2015 | By:                            | /s/Xiao Li Xin
|-------------------- | ------------------------------ | --------------
|                     | Name: Xiao Li Xin             
|                     |                               
|                     | Title: Chief Financial Officer



* This certification accompanies the Report
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 4610** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ALLEN GREY BEASLEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 0 0037

- JPJ

- PMS

- 1 )

Submitted : April 8 , 2013 Decided: April 16, 2013

Before DAVIS, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Michael L. Dennis, GALUMBECK, DENNIS & KEGLEY, Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellant. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Allen Grey Beasley appeal s the 240

- month , downward departure sentence he received on his conviction of conspiring to d istribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § § 841(b)(1)(A) and 846 (West 1999 & Supp. 2012). Although the Government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal under United States v. Hill , 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir. 1995) , as challenging only the extent of the substantial assistance downward departure that Beasley received, we believe that B easley’s appellate arguments are better read as essentially challenging his sentence as procedural ly and substantive ly unreasonable , as measured against the sentence received by one of his codefendants who did not provide substantial assistance to the Gove rnment . We therefore deny the Government’s motion. Nevertheless, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We discern no procedural error with the district court’s computation of the Guidelines range or its weighing of the various applicable factors

— including the sentence received by Beasley’s codefendant

— in determining the length of Beasley’s
sentence. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) ; see also 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), (e) (2006); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.1(b)
. Nor has Beasley identified any

reason to disturb the presumptive substantive reasonab leness of3 his below

- Guidelines sentence. United States v. Susi , 674 F.3d 278, 289 (4th Cir. 2012) (a sentence falling below the advisory Guidelines range is presumptive ly reasonable). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process . AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
        Section 1350 of chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the  United  States  Code,  in his  capacity  as an
officer of I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc. ("Isaacs"),  that, to his knowledge,  the
Annual Report of Isaacs on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully
complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information  contained in such report fairly  presents,  in
all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operation of
Isaacs.


Dated:  March 31, 2006

                                  /s/ Peter J. Rizzo
                                  ---------------------------------------
                                  Peter J. Rizzo, Chief Executive Officer


                                  /s/Gregg A. Holst
                                  ---------------------------------------
                                  Gregg A. Holst, Chief Financial Officer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Defendant’s Motion to File Under Seal (Doc. 56), and 

Amended Motion to File Under Seal (Doc. 83), and finding good cause, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to File Under Seal (Doc. 56) and 

Amended Motion to File Under Seal (Doc. 83) are GRANTED as follows: 

 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the Exhibits A-E attached to 

Defendants Notice of Errata (Doc. 57) as the exhibits to Defendant’s Response in 

Opposition to the Government’s Motion for Pretrial Detention. (Doc. 23.) The Clerk is 

further directed that Exhibit D, lodged at Doc. 57-1 at 40-44, shall be filed under seal. 

The Clerk shall file Exhibits A, B, C, and E, lodged at Doc. 57-1 at 2, 4-18, 20-38, and 

46-50, in the public record. 

 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike Exhibits A-K filed with Defendant’s 

Opposition to the Government’s Motion for Pretrial Detention. (Doc. 23-1 at 1-144.) 

Although stricken by this Order, Exhibits A-D, G, and H-K may be filed in the public 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 103 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

record, but Exhibits E and F, lodged at Doc. 57-1 at 74-96 and 98-100, shall be filed 

under seal. 

 Dated this 18th day of April, 2018. 

 

 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 103 Filed 04/19/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Xinhua China LTD. (the  "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period  ending June 30,  2009 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Xianping  Wang,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 9, 2009



                                        By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                            __________________________________
                                                Xianping Wang
                                                President and  Chief Executive
                                                Officer
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 19 - 00303 - CR DONALD RAY MCCRAY , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 251st District Court Potter County , Texas Trial Court No. 70 , 652 - C , Honorable Ana Estevez , Presiding



### September 27 , 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN , C.J. , and PIRTLE and PARKER , JJ. Appellant Donald Ray McCray , proceeding pro se , filed a notice of appeal from a purported judgment. 1 However , no pronouncement of sentence or appealable order has been entered by the trial court. Questioning whether we have jurisdiction over the appeal , we directed appellant to address the matter by September 9 , 2019. Appellant did not file a response.

1 Appellant has previously filed s even notices of appeal in this criminal case , cause numbers 07 - 16 - 00020 - CR , 07 - 16 - 00444 - CR , 07 - 17 - 00058 - CR , 07 - 17 - 00258 - CR , 07 - 18 - 00011 - CR , 07 - 18 - 00257 - CR , and 07 - 19 - 00167 - CR . We dismissed th ose appeals for want of jurisdi ction.2

As we stated in Kerr v. State , No. 07 - 13 - 00128 - CR , 2014 T ex. App. LEXIS 12850 , at *9 (Tex. App.
— Amarillo Nov. 25 , 2014 , no pet.) (mem. op. , not designated for publication) , “ [w]hen no sentence is pronounced , there is no valid judgment or conviction from which to appeal. ” Given the absence of either an oral pron ouncement of sentence or an appealable order , we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore , we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Per Curiam Do not publish.
#### Aaron W. WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 69394.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 30, 1996.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Aaron W. Watkins, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion with*548out an evidentiary hearing because the motion was not filed within the time constraints of Rule 24.035(b). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment denying the Rule 24.035 motion is not clearly erroneous. *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo.banc 1989). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1019-5 Filed 06/12/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1019-5 Filed 06/12/20 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1878

JACQUELINE ELIZABETH HERNANDEZ-QUIJANO; M.A.A.H.,

 Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 5, 2022 Decided: August 12, 2022

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Kevin Dougherty, LAW FIRM OF RUIZ DOUGHERTY, Herndon, 

Virginia, for Petitioners. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Zoe J. Heller, 

Senior Litigation Counsel, Erik R. Quick, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1878 Doc: 18 Filed: 08/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Elizabeth Hernandez-Quijano and her minor son, M.A.A.H., both

natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion to reconsider. Based upon our review 

of the record, we are satisfied that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying 

reconsideration. See Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009) (explaining

standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1878 Doc: 18 Filed: 08/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ROBERT P. WINTER, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D21-556

LT Case No. 2019-CA-003719-11J-G 

DAFFLYN PROPERTY, LLC., A 

FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY 

COMPANY, WILLIAM WARREN 

PROPERTIES, INC., A CALIFORNIA 

CORPORATION D/B/A STORQUEST 

SELF STORAGE, 7-ELEVEN INC., A 

TEXAS CORPORATION, ET AL., 

Appellees. 

________________________________/

Decision filed June 7, 2022 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Seminole County, 

Michael J. Rudisill, Judge. 

Phil A. D'Aniello, of Fassett, 

Anthony & Taylor, PA, 

Orlando, for Appellant. 

Lissette M. Gonzalez, of 

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., 

Miami, for Appellees. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

SASSO, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEONARD KNOX,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 495 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 894 

Honoring the 50th anniversary of the recording of the album ‘‘Kind of 

Blue’’ and reaffirming jazz as a national treasure. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2009 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 50th anniversary of the recording of the album 

‘‘Kind of Blue’’ and reaffirming jazz as a national treasure. 

Whereas, on August 17, 1959, Miles Davis, Jimmy Cobb, Bill 

Evans, Wynton Kelly, Paul Chambers, John Coltrane, 

and Julian ‘‘Cannonball’’ Adderley collaborated to record 

the album ‘‘Kind of Blue’’; 

Whereas ‘‘Kind of Blue’’ ranks 12th on the list of the ‘‘500 

Greatest Albums of All Time’’ published by Rolling Stone 

magazine; 

Whereas ‘‘Kind of Blue’’ was recorded in 1959, the year Columbia Records declared ‘‘jazz’s greatest year’’; 

Whereas ‘‘Kind of Blue’’ marked the beginning of the mass 

popularity of jazz in the United States; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 894 IH 

Whereas in 2008, the Recording Industry Association of 

America awarded ‘‘Kind of Blue’’ quadruple-platinum 

status, meaning 4,000,000 copies of the album had been 

sold; 

Whereas in 2002, the Library of Congress added ‘‘Kind of 

Blue’’ to the National Recording Registry; 

Whereas ‘‘Kind of Blue’’ was recognized as the bestselling 

record in the history of jazz; 

Whereas 50 years after the release of ‘‘Kind of Blue’’, MOJO 

magazine honored the Legacy Edition of the album by 

giving it the ‘‘Best Catalogue Release of the Year’’ 

award; 

Whereas ‘‘Kind of Blue’’ both redefined the concept of jazz 

for musicians and changed the perceptions of jazz held 

by many fans; 

Whereas today, the sole surviving member of the Miles Davis 

Sextet, Jimmy Cobb, is performing and touring with his 

So What Band in tribute to the 50th anniversary of 

‘‘Kind of Blue’’; and 

Whereas ‘‘Kind of Blue’’ continues to be the standard masterpiece of jazz for American musicians and audiences: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the 50th anniversary of ‘‘Kind of 

3 Blue’’ and recognizes the unique contribution the 

4 album has made to American jazz; 

5 (2) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent6 atives to transmit enrolled copies of this resolution 

7 to Columbia Records; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 894 IH 

1 (3) encourages the United States Government 

2 to take all appropriate steps to preserve and advance 

3 the art form of jazz music; 

4 (4) recommits itself to ensuring that musical 

5 artists such as Miles Davis and his Sextet receive 

6 fair protection under the copyright laws of the 

7 United States for their contributions to culture in 

8 the United States; and 

9 (5) reaffirms the status of jazz as a national 

10 treasure. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00398

- CV

Eric Anderson, Appellant

v. Matthew Sturdivant, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 1 OF TR AVIS COUNTY NO. C

- 1

- CV

- 18

- 012072 , THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRES IDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 9 , 2019

. On December 10, 2019 , we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to
his failure t o pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal by December 20, 2019 . Further, the not i c e advised appellant
that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this
Co urt’s notice, and the clerk’s record h a s not been filed.
If a trial

- court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismis s the appeal for want of prosecution u n less the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established2 that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 . Because appellant has failed t o pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

____________ ______________________________ Gisela D. Triana , Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana
Dismissed for Want of Pr osecution
Filed: February 19, 2020
EXHIBIT 99.2

KSL RECREATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of KSL Recreation Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric C. Resnick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: January 21, 2003 |  |                                                          
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ERIC C. RESNICKEric C. Resnick
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

---

QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of White Dental Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nancy White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Michael White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Nancy White


Nancy White


Chief Executive Officer


August 4, 2010








/s/ Michael White


Michael White


Chief Financial Officer


August 4, 2010
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the quarterly report of PITOOEY!, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob DiMartino, acting in
the capacity of President, Principal Accounting Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
                                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                         condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/
Jacob DiMartino

Jacob
DiMartino

President

Principal
Accounting Officer

Chief
Financial Officer



August
15, 2014