alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      21


PMA
Capital CorporationSignificant Subsidiaries of RegistrantAs of December
31, 2004

PMA
Capital Corporation (Pennsylvania)     Pennsylvania
Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company
(Pennsylvania)     Pennsylvania Manufacturers
Indemnity Company (Pennsylvania)     Manufacturers
Alliance Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)     PMA
Capital Insurance Company
(Pennsylvania)          PMA
Holdings Ltd.
(Bermuda)               Pennsylvania
Manufacturers' International Insurance Ltd.
(Bermuda)     Mid-Atlantic States Investment
Company
(Delaware)          PMA
Holdings, Cayman Ltd.
(Cayman)          High
Mountain Reinsurance, Ltd.
(Cayman)          PMA
Insurance SPC, Cayman (Cayman)     PMA Re
Management Company (Pennsylvania)     PMA
Management Corp. (Pennsylvania)
J

- A13012

- 16 2017 PA Super 8

BARBARA A. DITTMAN, GARY R. DOUGLAS, ALICE PASTI RIK, JOANN DECOLATI, TINA SORRE NTINO, KRISTEN CUSHMAN AND SHANNON MOLYNEAUX, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SIT UATED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellants

v. UPMC D/B/A THE UNIVE RSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL C ENTER, AND UPMC MCKEESPORT Appellees No. 971 WDA 2015

Appeal from the Order Entered May 28 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County

Civil Division at No: GD14

- 003285

BEFORE: OLSON, STABILE, and MUSMANNO, JJ. CONCURRING STATEMENT BY STABILE, J.: FILED JANUARY 12, 2017 I join the Majority’s opinion today, but write merely to express my view that in this constantly developing area of law and technology we must proceed to establish precedent slowly and with caution. Today’s decision should stand for no more than the concl usion that a legal duty was not found to exist under the facts as pled in this case. As the Majority notes, the Appellants failed to make allegations of specific threats and problems with UPMC’s computer system to alter the finding of no duty in this case

. See Maj. Op. at 8 n.4 (citing In re: The Home Depot, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation , 2016 WL 2897520 (N.D. Ga., May 18, 2016)).J

- A13012

- 16

- 2

-

Had UPMC been on notice of actual or potential security breaches of its systems, or reasonably should have an ticipated that the negligent handling of confidential information would have left it vulnerable to criminal activity, 1 a different conclusion may have been reached under the factors of the Althaus 2 test. I also agree under the second factor of the Altha us test that there is significant social utility in companies like UPMC being able to store information electronically. The entire world is moving towards electronic storage of information. With this will come a greater awareness of what is reasonable in terms of the care and storage of confidential information. At some point, the balance of weighing social utility in favor of data storage entities may shift more in favor of persons like Appellants. When harm becomes foreseeable under circumstances that commonly are understood to render storage vulnerable, the fourth Althaus factor may weigh in favor of imposing additional duties upon an actor even absent legislative action. As for the fifth and final factor under the Althaus test (the overall public
in terest), I believe that this factor too may shift as the foreseeability of harm changes with the evolution and increased use of this technology. Judge Olson joins this Concurring Statement.

____________________________________________ 1 As the Majority notes, citing Mahon v. Am - Guard, Inc. , 841 A.2d 1052, 1060

- 1061 (Pa. Super. 2003). 2 Althaus v. Cohen , 756 A.2d 1166 (Pa. 2000).
Exhibit C 

(Filed Under Seal) 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1267-3 Filed 09/03/21 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-38462, 333-71525, 333-61223, 333-63889, and
333-48797) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-68794, 333-43904, 333-40770, 333-40772,
333-37959 and 333-38137) of RCN Corporation and its Subsidiaries of our report
dated March 12, 2003, which contains an explanatory paragraph stating that the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets" and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" on
January 1, 2002, dated March 12, 2003 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedules of RCN Corporation, which appear in RCN
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 90 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 90

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 30, 2009.
Whereas college and university campuses are not immune from the crime problems 
        that face the rest of society in the United States;
Whereas a total of 37 homicides, 8,112 forcible-sex offenses, 8,923 aggravated 
        assaults, and 3,071 cases of arson were reported on college and 
        university campuses from 2004 to 2006, in accordance with the reporting 
        requirements under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy 
        and Campus Crime Statistics Act (20 U.S.C. 1092(f); Public Law 89-329);
Whereas criminal experts estimate that between \1/5\ and \1/4\ of female 
        students become the victim of a completed or attempted rape, usually by 
        someone they know, during their college careers, but fewer than 5 
        percent report the assault to law enforcement;
Whereas each year, 13 percent of female students enrolled in an undergraduate 
        program at a college or university will be victims of stalking;
Whereas 1,700 college and university students between the ages of 18 and 24 die 
        each year from unintentional alcohol-related injuries, including motor 
        vehicle accidents;
Whereas Security On Campus, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as ``SOC''), a 
        national nonprofit group dedicated to promoting safety and security on 
        college and university campuses, has designated September as National 
        Campus Safety Awareness Month;
Whereas each September since 2005, SOC has partnered with colleges and 
        universities across the United States to offer National Campus Safety 
        Awareness Month educational programming on sexual assault, alcohol and 
        other drug abuse, hazing, stalking, and other critical campus safety 
        issues; and
Whereas National Campus Safety Awareness Month provides an opportunity for 
        entire campus communities to become engaged in efforts to improve campus 
        safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety 
        Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages colleges and universities throughout the United 
        States to provide campus safety and other crime awareness and prevention 
        programs to all students throughout the year.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 80-215 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

THE STATE OF MONTANA, ex rel., 

DAVID ERROL RASMUSSEN, a/k/a 

DAVID ERROL HENSRUD, 

Relator, 

THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT, GALLATIN COUNTY, 

HON. JOSEPH B. GARY, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondent. 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING: 

For Relator: 

A. Michael Salvagni, Bozeman, Montana 

For Respondent: 

Donald E. White, County Attorney, Bozeman, Montana 

Submitted on briefs: August 8, 1980 

Decided: AbG 2 5 1980 

Filed: 
Mr. Justice Gene B. Daly delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

Relator has filed an application for a writ of supervisory control to review and reverse the District Court's 

denial of his motion to dismiss Count 11 of an information 

charging him with assault, a misdemeanor, in violation of 

section 45-5-201 (1) (a), MCA. Count I of the information 

charges burglary, a felony, in violation of section 45-6- 

204 (I), MCA. 

The two charges in the information indicate that relator 

entered the apartment of Robin Lessley in Bozeman, Montana, 

for the purpose of ransacking it, and while in the apartment, 

he hit Robin Lessley in the face three times with his hand. 

Relator contends the District Court has no jurisdiction 

to try him for a misdemeanor, simple assault. The State 

contends that the District Court has jurisdiction to try a 

felony and a misdemeanor together where the two are connected 

together in their commission. The question in this case, 

therefore, is whether the District Court has jurisdiction to 

try relator for simple assault, a misdemeanor. 

Jurisdiction of the District and Justice Courts over 

criminal matters depends on the maximum sentence that can be 

imposed for committing the crime. Under section 3-5-302(1), 

MCA, the District Court is given original jurisdiction in 

all felony criminal cases and "all cases of misdemeanor not 

otherwise provided for." The Justice Court, on the other 

hand, is given criminal jurisdiction of all misdemeanors 

punishable by a fine not exceeding $500 or imprisonment not 

exceeding six months or both. Section 3-10-303(1), MCA. 

The maximum sentence for a person convicted of assault is a 

fine not exceeding $500 or imprisonment not exceeding six 

months or both. Section 45-5-201 (2) , MCA. 
Under section 46-11-404(1), MCA, "[aln . . . information . . . may charge two or more different offenses connected 

together in their commission." This section is not a grant 

of jurisdiction but simply a permissive joinder statute for 

offenses within the jurisdiction of a given court. It is 

provided that jurisdiction for misdemeanor assault lies with 

the Justice Court. 

We, therefore, reverse the District Court's denial of 

dismissal of Count I1 and remand to the District Court for 

further proceedings on Count I. 

J/ 

Jus Ice 

We concur: 

Z-~QPG~ 

Chief Justice
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of RAADR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob DiMartino, acting in the capacity of President, Principal Accounting Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

*/s/ Jacob DiMartino*

     Jacob DiMartino

     Chief Executive Officer

     Chief Financial Officer

     Principal Accounting Officer

    June 13, 2019
Presidential Documents

30799

Federal Register

Vol. 61, No. 118

Tuesday, June 18, 1996

Title 3—

The President

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 18, 1996 / Presidential Documents

Executive Order 13009 of June 14, 1996

Amendment to Executive Order No. 12963 Entitled

Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States of America, and in order to increase the membership

of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, it is hereby ordered

that Executive Order No. 12963 is amended by deleting the number ‘‘30’’

in the second sentence of section 1(a) of that order and inserting the number

[FR Doc. 96–15656

‘‘35’’ in lieu thereof.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

June 14, 1996.

œ–

Filed 6–17–96; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

Defendants have filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s June 1, 2023, 

Order denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 1622). 

The Court will order expedited briefing on the Motion. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Government shall file its response to the Motion for 

Reconsideration by July 3, 2023. Defendants shall have until July 6, 2023, to file a 

supporting reply brief. 

Dated this 29th day of June, 2023.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1623 Filed 06/29/23 Page 1 of 1
No. 72-6179.

#### Hayles et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANTTO

SECTION906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEYACTOF 2002(18U.S.C. 1350)

 

Inconnection withthisReport on Form10-Qforthe three and nine monthsended June 30, 2018(the “Report”)ofPennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”),asfiled withthe SecuritiesandExchange Commissiononthe datehereof, I,ArthurH. Penn, ChiefExecutive Officerofthe Registrant,herebycertify, tothe best ofmyknowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplieswiththe requirementsof Section13(a)or15(d)ofthe SecuritiesExchange Act of1934, as amended;and

 

(2)  The informationcontainedinthe Report fairlypresents, inall material respects, the financial conditionandresultsof operationsoftheRegistrant.

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn                                    |
| Name:  Arthur H. Penn                       |
| Title:    Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:    August 8, 2018           |
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERUNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Mei Song, the chief financialofficer of LogicVision, Inc. (the “Company”), certify for the purposes ofsection 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to thebest of my knowledge,

     (i) theAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                   SECTION 302
                    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Dejan Mirkovic, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Shopper's Wallet,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, the results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: July 18, 2007         By /s/ Dejan Mirkovic
                              ------------------------------------------
                              Dejan Mirkovic,
                              Principal Financial Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Jardine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Silverstar Mining
      Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Silverstar Mining Corp.                                                                   

Dated: May 14, 2008

| | /s/
      John Jardine                                     
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | John Jardine                                               
| | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
      Officer     
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   
| | Silverstar Mining Corp.                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silverstar
Mining Corp. and will be retained by Silverstar Mining Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit 99.5****PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES**     The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by us for audit and other services providedby Ernst & Young LLP during 2005 and 2006:           Year Ended  December 31,  2006 2005**Audit fees****(1)** **$****1,496,000**  **$****1,019,000** **Audit-related fees****(2)**  **38,000**   **65,000** **Tax-related fees (3)**  **36,000**   **—** **All other fees**  **—**   **—**  (1) Consists of professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our financialstatements for the most recent fiscal year, reviews of the financial statements included inour quarterly reports on Form 10-Q during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 andDecember 31, 2006, and the issuance of consents for filings with the SEC. (2) Includes transaction due diligence and related accounting consultations.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1/32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cellular Accessories
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Clifford Chapman, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






/s/ Clifford
              ChapmanName:
              Clifford ChapmanTitle:
                Chief Executive and Financial Officer
              Date: May 18, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2022 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|                    |        |                         |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn |
| Name:              |   | Arthur H. Penn          |
| Title:             |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:              |   | May 4, 2022             |

 

 

----