alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 GLOBE SPECIALTY METALS, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    [paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has
materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: February 16, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Jeff BradleyJeff BradleyChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jack Morgan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB  of  Cellway  Ventures,  Inc.  for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  Cellway  Ventures,  Inc.


                                       By:      /s/ Jack Morgan
                                                ---------------
                                       Name:    JACK  MORGAN

                                       Title:   Chief  Executive  Officer
                                                and  Chief  Financial  Officer

                                       Date:    March  28,  2003
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: September 22, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg and Gopi 

K. Panchapakesan, Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant 

Padilla, present; Joy M. Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 11):

9:11 a.m. Court reconvenes. 9:13 a.m. Jury present. Carl Ferrer examined further. Exhibits 2041, 2042, 

85a pages 1 and 5, 836a page 2, 1 page 4, 1796, 222, and 222a are admitted. 10:46 a.m. Recess.

11:05 a.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion held re: Exhibit 1. 11:10 a.m. Jury present. Witness examined 

further. Exhibits 1 page 3, 1718, 1719, 1720, 1721, 1735, 1723, 1724, 1725, 1727 page 1, 1728, 1729, 

1730, 1731, 1732, 1722, 1726, 1733, 223, 224, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, and 225 are admitted. 12:20 

p.m. Cross-Examination by Mr. Feder. 12:32 p.m. Jury exits courtroom. Discussion held re: Exhibits. 

Government shall file a Reply to its Stipulation and Objections (Doc. 1801) by 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, 

September 23, 2023. A hearing to address the objections re: Exhibits is set for Monday, September 

25, 2023 at 3:45 p.m. in Courtroom 605. Counsel may appear telephonically and the presence of 

Defendants may be waived. Counsel waive the presence of their respective clients for Defendants 

Lacey, Padilla, Spear and Vaught for Monday’s hearing. 12:47 p.m. Trial in recess until Tuesday, 

September 26, 2023 at 8:45 a.m.

Court Reporter Cathy Taylor

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 9:11 AM

Stop: 12:47 PM

Total: 3hrs 31min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1806 Filed 09/22/23 Page 1 of 1
TN: Pablo Patino-Villanueva
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Viorel Sfarcioc, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00415-01-PHX-SMB 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On April 25, 2019, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition to revoke 

conditions of release. The Court considered the information provided to the Court, and the 

arguments of counsel, in determining whether the Defendant should be released on 

conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that Defendant has violated the 

conditions of release and that there is no condition or combination of conditions available 

to the Court that will reasonably assure the appearance of Defendant as required. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3148(b). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 25th day of April, 2019. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KM 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

James Everett Dutschke, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JT Shartle, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV 18-00156-TUC-JGZ 

ORDER FOR PAYMENT

OF INMATE FILING FEE 

TO: THE WARDEN OF THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY-TUCSON 

Plaintiff James Everett Dutschke, inmate #15536-042, who is confined in the 

United States Penitentiary-Tucson, must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. Plaintiff 

is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee in monthly 

payments of 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s trust account. 

The Warden of the United States Penitentiary-Tucson or his/her designee must collect 

and forward these payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account 

exceeds $10.00. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

 (1) The Warden of the United States Penitentiary-Tucson or his/her designee 

must collect the $350.00 filing fee from Plaintiff’s trust account in monthly payments of 

20% of the preceding month’s income credited to the account. Payments must be 

forwarded to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 

The payments must be clearly identified by the name and number assigned to this action. 

Case 4:18-cv-00156-JGZ Document 12 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 (2) The Warden of the United States Penitentiary-Tucson or his/her designee 

must notify the Clerk of Court in writing when Plaintiff is released or transferred to a 

correctional institution other than the United States Penitentiary-Tucson, so new billing 

arrangements may be made to collect any outstanding balance. 

 (3) The Clerk of Court must serve by mail a copy of this Order on the Warden 

of the United States Penitentiary-Tucson, U.S. Penitentiary, 9300 South Wilmot Road, 

Tucson, Arizona 85706. 

 (4) The Clerk of Court must forward a copy of this Order to Financial 

Administration for the Tucson Division of the United States District Court for the District 

of Arizona. Financial Administration must set up an account to receive payments on the 

filing fee for this action and must notify the Court when the filing fee is paid in full. 

 Dated this 23rd day of May, 2018. 

Case 4:18-cv-00156-JGZ Document 12 Filed 05/25/18 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32**
















**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**




















The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Greg Cowan, President and
      Principal Accounting Officer of Rose Explorations Inc. hereby certifies that:





1.
      the
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rose Explorations
      Inc.











Dated:  
      August 4,
      2007 **ROSE
      EXPLORATIONS INC., Registrant**




/s/
      Greg
      Cowan


By:
      Greg Cowan, President and Principal Accounting Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

May 18, 2021

JUMITRIUS R. HUTCHINS v. CHATTANOOGA HAMILTON COUNTY 

HOSPITAL AUTHORITY D/B/A/ ERLANGER HEALTH SYSTEM

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County

No. 20C749 L. Marie Williams, Judge

___________________________________

No. E2020-01486-COA-R3-CV

___________________________________

Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed this Court lacks jurisdiction 

to consider this appeal.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J.; JOHN W. MCCLARTY, J.; AND, THOMAS R. FRIERSON, 

II, J.

Jumitrius R. Hutchins, Stevenson, Alabama, pro se appellant.

Arthur P. Brock and Brian Christopher Bush, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellee, 

Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority dba Erlanger Health System.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Upon a review of the record, this Court determined that the notice of appeal was not 

timely filed in accordance with Rule 4(a) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

 

1 Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides:

This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may 

affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion 

when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided 

by memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” 

shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any 

unrelated case.

05/19/2021
- 2 -

The Trial Court’s judgment was entered on September 28, 2020. Appellant, Jumitrius R. 

Hutchins (“Appellant”), filed his notice of appeal in this Court on October 29, 2020, which 

is thirty-one days after entry of the Trial Court’s judgment. By Order entered May 4, 2021, 

this Court ordered Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. 

Appellant responded to our show cause order and stated he was late in filing due to health 

issues.

 A notice of appeal “shall be filed with the clerk of the appellate court within 30 days 

after the date of entry of the judgment appealed from . . ..” Tenn. R. App. P 4(a). “The 

thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional in civil 

cases.” Albert v. Frye, 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004); see also Ball v. McDowell, 288 

S.W.3d 833, 836 (Tenn. 2009). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, this Court is not at 

liberty to waive the procedural defect. Tenn. R. App. P. 2.; see also Arfken & Assocs., P.A. 

v. Simpson Bridge Co., 85 S.W.3d 789, 791 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). 

As Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal within thirty days of entry of the Trial 

Court’s judgment, the notice of appeal was untimely filed, thus depriving this Court of 

jurisdiction. This appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs on appeal are taxed to Appellant, 

Jumitrius R. Hutchins, for which execution may issue. 

PER CURIAM
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of
Opencell Biomed Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August
31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|October 20, 2011 | /s/ Mislav
      Pavelic        
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|                 | Mislav Pavelic, President       
|                 | (as Principal Executive Officer)

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00311

- CV

Ernest BUSTOS

, Appellant

v.

ENCINO PARK HOMEOWNERS

,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 18828 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due to be filed in this appeal on September 10, 2019. On September 24, 2019, this court notified the court reporter that the reporter’s record was late. The court reporter responded to our notice by stating that the r eporter’s record was not filed because appellant had failed to request the record or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record

.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that : (A) the appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, which request must designate the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits to be included, s ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b)(1); and (B) the rep orter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). If appellant provides sufficient proof that a request and payment arrangements have been made , the reporter’s record m ust be filed in this court no later than one week after the date appellant’s written proof is filed with this court

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ L uz E strada

, Chief Deputy Clerk
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15500]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 96-064]

NASA Advisory Council, Advisory Committee on the International 
Space Station (ACISS); Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Advisory Committee on 
the International Space Station.

DATES: July 8, 1996, 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and July 9, 1996, 11:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Building 1, Room 966, 
Houston, TX 77058-3696.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Bruce Luna, Code M-4, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-1101.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--International Partnerships
--Hardware Status
--Test and Verification
--Space Station Science and Technology Program
--XCRV Status

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: June 13, 1996.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-15500 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
```
[Cite as Warren v. Cent. State Univ. , 2011-Ohio-5958.]



# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

SUSAN WARREN, Case No. 2008-09520

Plaintiff,

v. Judge Joseph T. Clark Magistrate Anderson M. Renick

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.,

Defendants. JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶1} This case is sua sponte assigned to Judge Joseph T. Clark to conduct all proceedings necessary for decision in this matter. {¶2} On October 21, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendants. {¶3} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of t he filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” {¶4} Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i) provides: “The court may enter a judgment either during the fourteen days permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) for the filing of objections to a magistrate’s decision or after the fourteen days have expired. If the court enters a judgment during the fourteen days permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) for the filing of objections, the timely filing of objections to the magistrate’s decision shall operate as an automatic stay of execution of the judgment until the court disposes of those objections and vacates, modifies, or adheres to the judgment previously entered.” {¶5} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident onCase No. 2008-09520 - 2 - ENTRY

the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendants. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

_____________________________________ JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge

cc:

Don A. Little 7960 Clyo Road Clyo Professional Center Dayton, Ohio 45459 Eric A. Walker A ssistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130

Jessica R. Moss 7501 Paragon Road Lower Level Dayton, Ohio 45459

Filed October 21, 2011 To S.C. reporter November 18, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

5. Dan Hyer, Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-005-PHX-SMB

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the Government’s Motion to Continue Sentencing, there 

being no objection, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion to Continue Sentencing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the Sentencing from April 5, 2021, to

at .

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1127-1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SavWatt USA, Inc. ("Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Isaac H. Sutton,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 25, 2010                     /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)