alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12520]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Export Administration


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Partially Closed Meeting

    A meeting of the Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory 
Committee will be held June 12, 1996, 9:00 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 1617M-2, 14th Street between Constitution and 
Pennsylvania Avenues, N.W., Washington, D.C. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with 
respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls 
applicable to sensors and related equipment and technology.

Agenda

General Session

    1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
    2. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
    3. Discussion on Executive Order on licensing processing.
    4. Discussion on Export Administration Regulations reform.

Executive Session

    5. Discussion of matters properly classified under Executive 
Order 12958, dealing with the U.S. export control program and 
strategic criteria related thereto.

    The General Session of the meeting will be open to the public and a 
limited number of seats will be available. To the extent that time 
permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials two weeks 
prior to the meeting date to the following address: Ms. Lee Ann 
Carpenter, OAS/EA/BXA--Room 3886C, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
Washington, D.C. 20230.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on December 13, 1995, pursuant 
to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 
that the series of meetings of the Committee and of any Subcommittees 
thereof, dealing with the classified materials listed in 5 U.S.C., 
552b(c)(1) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public 
meetings found in section 10 (a)(1) and (a)(3), of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act. The remaining series of meetings or portions thereof 
will be open to the public.
    A copy of the Notice of Determination to close meetings or portions 
of meetings of the Committee is available for public inspection and 
copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 
6020, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. For further 
information or copies of the minutes, contact Lee Ann Carpenter on 
(202) 482-2583.

    Dated: May 14, 1996.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-12520 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: October 12, 2022

 

*/s/ Rod Bartlett*

Roderick Bartlett

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15786]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Order of the United States District 
Court for the Southern District of Texas, dated December 15, 1995, the 
United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the license 
of First City Capital Corporation, a Texas corporation, to function as 
a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment 
Company License No. 06/10-0022 issued to First City Capital Corporation 
on August 26, 1960 and said license is hereby declared null and void as 
of March 28, 1996.

    Dated: June 14, 1996.

United States Small Business Administration.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 96-15786 Filed 6-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1555-07-P
Order entered December 13 , 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01203

- CV

IN RE GOLDFARB, PLLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Cour t

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 16

- 03747



### O RDER

Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. Consequently, relator’s October 11, 2018 motion to stay and its November 15, 2018

motion for expedited consideration of its motion to stay are DENIED as moot.

/Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001041633
<NAME>                        Cambridge Energy Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                  33,211
<SECURITIES>                            18,750
<RECEIVABLES>                          357,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                            216,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     1,022,008
<PP&E>                               5,592,754
<DEPRECIATION>                          71,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       6,614,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                5,060,800
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                 13
<COMMON>                                 1,164
<OTHER-SE>                           1,552,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         6,614,762
<SALES>                                529,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       562,026
<CGS>                                  243,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        1,808,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         5,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    (1,270,322)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (1,270,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,270,322)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,270,322)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.13)



</TABLE>
|   | (i) | the      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Issuer. |
|--------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May      4, 2009 |   | /s/      Tim Courtis |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------|
|                         |   | Tim      Courtis     |
#### Lowal Jay JONES, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Respondent. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant.

No. 19262.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

July 28, 1994.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

No appearance for plaintiff-respondent.

PREWITT, Judge.

The Missouri Director of Revenue appeals an order dated November 24, 1993, setting *627aside the revocation of the automobile driving privileges of plaintiff and ordering “the Director of the Department of Revenue of the State of Missouri to deliver Plaintiffs driver’s license to him.”1

In his point relied on, the Director of Revenue correctly asserts that he is a necessary party to a proceeding under § 577.041, RSMo Supp.1992 (since amended, see RSMo Supp.1993). Failure to make him a party deprives the trial court of jurisdiction. *See Williams v. Director of Revenue,*873 S.W.2d 340, 341 (Mo.App.1994). Appellant was not initially named a party nor later added by court order, necessary requirements for him to be a party. *Id.*

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the trial court set aside its order and judgment and enter judgment dismissing plaintiffs petition.

CROW and PARRISH, JJ., concur.

1

. Plaintiff has filed no brief nor otherwise appeared here.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William UusiheimalaPrincipal
      Executive OfficerMay
      5, 2009
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. James W. PIKE, Respondent.

No. 93-SC-209-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 18, 1993.

Raymond Clooney, Kentucky Bar Ass’n, Frankfort, Gardner L. Turner, Chairman, Inquiry Tribunal, Lexington, for petitioner.

James W. Pike, LaGrange, for respondent.

ORDER OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION

Pursuant to SCR 3.165, the Kentucky Bar Association filed a petition for temporary suspension against the respondent, James W. Pike, on March 29, 1993. No response has been tendered to the March 30, 1993, show cause order issued by this Court.

Respondent originally qualified in Oldham District Court as the personal representative of the Mary Bennett estate. He was later removed after failing to make a distribution of assets as outlined in the Final Settlement. It appears from the petition and attached affidavit that the reason for his having failed to make said distribution was his misappropriation of approximately $145,000.00 from the estate of Mary Bennett. This is evidenced by copies of canceled checks which respondent had written to himself out of the estate.

It further appears that reasonable cause exists to believe that unless an order of temporary suspension is issued, a real and present danger exists to the public.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent, James W. Pike, be and he is hereby temporarily suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth until further order of this Court. Within twenty (20) days from the date of the entry of this order of suspension, respondent shall notify all clients in writing of his inability to continue to represent them and is to furnish photostatic copies of said letters of notice to the director of the Kentucky Bar Association.

All concur.

ENTERED: May 18, 1993.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens /s/ Chief Justice
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement - David Schramm



 Exhibit 10.33 
 MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 9244 BALBOA
AVENUE 
 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 
 December 19th, 2008 
 David Schramm 
 Dear
David: 
 You and Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) signed an offer letter dated July 9, 2007 (the “Offer
Letter”). To avoid potential adverse tax consequences imposed by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the Offer Letter is hereby amended by inserting the following new provisions at the end of
Section 8 of the Offer Letter: 
 Separation from Service. Wherever this Offer Letter refers to a termination of
employment, including (without limitation) a termination without Cause, the reference will be construed as a Separation. For all purposes under this Offer Letter, “Separation” means a “separation from service,” as defined in the
regulations under Section 409A of the Code. This paragraph supersedes any contrary provision of this Offer Letter. 
 Commencement of Severance Payments. Payment of the periodic salary continuation severance pay provided for under this Section 8 will begin on the first regularly scheduled payroll date that occurs on or after 45 days after your
Separation, but only if you have complied with the release and other preconditions set forth in this Section 8 before that date. For purposes of Section 409A of the Code, each salary continuation payment under Section 8 is hereby designated as a
separate payment. The Company will deliver the release referred to in this Section 8 to you within 30 days after your Separation. You must execute and return the release within the period of time set forth in the form of release. 
 Except as expressly set forth above, the Offer Letter will remain in effect without change. 
 You may indicate your agreement with this amendment of the Offer Letter by signing and dating the enclosed duplicate original of this letter agreement
and returning it to 







 David Schramm 
 December 19th,
2008 
 Page 2 
  
 me. This letter agreement may be executed in two counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but both of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 
 Very truly yours, 
  
  

			
	MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Tim Hart
	Name:	 	Tim Hart
	Title:	 	VP, CFO & Treasurer
		 	(On behalf of Compensation Committee)


  
  

	
	I have read and accept this amendment:
	
	/s/ David Schramm
	David Schramm

 Dated: 19th December 2008 
  

 2
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert Thomas WALLACE, Appellant.

Nos. WD 49465, WD 50971.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 21, 1995.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert T. Wallace appeals his conviction of three counts of Class B sodomy, Section 566.060, RSMo (1986), and five additional counts of sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.1990, and concurrent twelve year sentences on each of these counts. The sentences imposed for the first three counts were to run consecutively to the last five counts for a total of twenty-four years incarceration. Mr. Wallace claims error in 1) denial of his Rule 29.15 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and 2) in the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal filed at the close of all evidence. Mr. Wallace waived his right to a jury trial and the case was tried to the court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a published opinion. Mr. Wallace is provided with a copy of the court’s reasoning regarding the points he raised on appeal.

The judgment of conviction of each of the counts for which Mr. Wallace was convicted is affirmed. The order denying the Rule 29.15 postconviction motion is affirmed.

Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zhijuan Guo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 12, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Zhijuan GuoZhijuan
      Guo
                Chief
      Financial Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America

Plaintiff,

v.

Andrew Padilla,

Defendant.

CR-18-00422-06-PHX-DJH-DMF

ORDER 

Upon motion of Defendant and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant Andrew Padilla’s motion to appear by telephone

or video conference at the Frye/Cooper hearing set for August 18, 2013 at 11:30 a.m. (Doc. ).

Instructions will be provided for his remote appearance by separate e-mail notification. 

Dated this day of August, 2023.

 

 Honorable Deborah M. Fine 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1702-1 Filed 08/15/23 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Kai GUI, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 16th day of September 2010.




/s/ Kai GUIKai GUI, Director, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer
CORE/3505308.0002/142257483.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Carrie M. Francis (020453)

Stefan M. Palys (024752) 

Michael Vincent (029864)

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Tel: (602) 279-1600 

Fax: (602) 240-6925 

Email: carrie.francis@stinson.com

 stefan.palys@stinson.com

 michael.vincent@stinson.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeremy Thacker, No. 2:18-cv-00063-PHX-DJH

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF 

SERVICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC; Robert J. Donat, 

Individually and as Trustee of The 

Robert Donat Living Trust Dated April 

19, 2017; 

Defendants.

Defendants hereby give notice, pursuant to General Order 17-08, of service upon 

Plaintiff of Defendants’ Thirteenth Supplemental Disclosure Statement by e-mail on 

September 4, 2018. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 4th day of September, 2018. 

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP 

By: /s/ Michael Vincent 

Carrie M. Francis

Stefan M. Palys 

Michael Vincent

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 107 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

CORE/3505308.0002/142257483.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 4, 2018, I caused the foregoing document to 

be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF; and that ECF will send an 

e-notice of the electronic filing to: 

Kraig J. Marton 

Jeffrey A. Silence 

Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 

3200 N. Central Avenue, 20th Fl 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

kjm@jaburgwilk.com 

jxs@jaburgwilk.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Timothy B. O’Connor 

Schneider & Onofry, PC 

365 East Coronado Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 

toconnor@soarizonalaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Donat 

/s/ C. Roundtree 

Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 107 Filed 09/04/18 Page 2 of 2