Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[Mark One]ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010ORo

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period
from                                    to


Commission File Number: 000-53195

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland(State or other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

20-5383745(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


15601 Dallas Parkway, Suite 600, Addison, Texas 75001(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (ZIP Code)

(866) 655-3600(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

None(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ý


Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o    No ý

As of May 7, 2010, the Registrant had 78,660,086 shares of common stock outstanding.



---





Table of Contents



BEHRINGER HARVARD MULTIFAMILY REIT I, INC.  Form 10-Q  Quarter Ended March 31, 2010

PART 1  FINANCIAL INFORMATION



PageItem 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited)Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

3Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009

4Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the
year ended December 31, 2009

5Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009

6Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations

37Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk

67Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

68PART II
OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.

Legal Proceedings

70Item 1A.

Risk Factors

70Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds

70Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

72Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

72Item 5.

Other Information

72Item 6.

Exhibits

72Signature

78


2

---





Table of Contents

Item 1.    Financial Statements (unaudited).



Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.        Consolidated Balance Sheets        (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)    
(Unaudited)

March 31,
2010

December 31,
2009AssetsReal estate:Land

$
47,200

$
39,100Buildings and improvements


200,897


121,363248,097


160,463Less accumulated depreciation


(3,289
)

(1,484
)Total real estate, net


244,808


158,979Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


276,548


279,859Cash and cash equivalents


134,670


77,540Note and other receivables


4,080


4,025Deferred financing costs, net


3,667


834Receivables from affiliates


2,184


258Intangibles, net


19,719


1,205Other assets, net


2,475


3,022Total assets

$
688,151

$
525,722Liabilities and stockholders' equityLiabilitiesMortgage loans payable

$
93,793

$
51,300Credit facility payable


10,000


Payables to affiliates


663


2,278Distributions payable


4,113


3,248Accrued offering costs payable to affiliates


1,143


1,411Deferred lease revenues and other related liabilities, net


14,853


15,197Tenant security deposits and prepaid rent


603


405Accounts payable and other liabilities


3,341


866Total liabilities


128,509


74,705Commitments and contingenciesStockholders' equityPreferred stock, $.0001 par value per share; 125,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding





Non-participating, non-voting convertible stock, $.0001 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding





Common stock, $.0001 par value per share; 875,000,000 shares authorized, 71,538,900 and 57,098,265 shares issued and outstanding at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively


7


5Additional paid-in capital


615,601


486,880Cumulative distributions and net loss


(55,966
)

(35,868
)Total stockholders' equity


559,642


451,017Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
688,151

$
525,722


See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

---





Table of Contents



Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.        Consolidated Statements of Operations        (in thousands, except per share amounts)    
(Unaudited)

For the Three
Months Ended
March 31,2010

2009Rental revenues

$
5,146

$
ExpensesProperty operating expenses


1,396


Real estate taxes


588


Asset management and other fees


1,278


262General and administrative expenses


1,016


761Acquisition expenses


2,776


Interest expense


642


Depreciation and amortization


3,588


14Total expenses


11,284


1,037Interest income


326


80Equity in earnings (loss) of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


(3,207
)

1,095Net income (loss)

$
(9,019
)
$
138Weighted average number of common shares outstanding


64,222


17,376Basic and diluted income (loss) per share

$
(0.14
)
$
0.01


See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

---





Table of Contents



Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.        Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity        (in thousands)        (Unaudited)

Convertible Stock

Common StockNumber
of Shares

Par
Value

Number
of Shares

Par
Value

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Cumulative
Distributions
and Net Loss

Total
Stockholders'
EquityBalance at January 1, 2009


1

$



15,348

$
1

$
117,268

$
(4,875
)
$
112,394Net loss

















(8,305
)

(8,305
)Sales of common stock, net








41,129


4


363,332





363,336Redemptions of common stock








(304
)




(2,512
)




(2,512
)Distributions declared on common stock

















(22,688
)

(22,688
)Stock issued pursuant to Distribution Reinvestment Plan, net








925





8,792





8,792Balance at December 31, 2009


1





57,098


5


486,880


(35,868
)

451,017Net loss

















(9,019
)

(9,019
)Sales of common stock, net








13,985


2


124,315





124,317Redemptions of common stock








(97
)




(839
)




(839
)Distributions declared on common stock

















(11,079
)

(11,079
)Stock issued pursuant to Distribution Reinvestment Plan, net








553





5,245





5,245Balance at March 31, 2010


1

$



71,539

$
7

$
615,601

$
(55,966
)
$
559,642


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

---





Table of Contents



Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows        (in thousands)        (Unaudited)

For the Three Months
Ended March 31,2010

2009Cash flows from operating activitiesNet Income (loss)

$
(9,019
)
$
138Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:Equity in (earnings) loss of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


3,207


(1,095
)Distributions received from investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


1,537


1,302Depreciation


1,806


Amortization of intangibles


1,587


14Amortization of deferred financing costs


197


Amortization of deferred lease revenues and other related liabilities


(344
)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities


891


(30
)Other assets


(174
)

124Accounts receivable


(102
)

Payables to affiliates


(4
)

124Accrued interest on note receivable


(55
)

(19
)Cash provided by (used in) operating activities


(473
)

558Cash flows from investing activitiesAcquisition of and additions to real estate


(80,482
)

Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


(30,885
)

(3,752
)Return of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


29,445


2,797Advances to/from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


(3,521
)

129Escrow deposits


1,032


(405
)Prepaid or reimbursable acquisition costs


27


Issuances of note receivable





(1,594
)Cash used in investing activities


(84,384
)

(2,825
)Cash flows from financing activitiesProceeds from sales of common stock


139,453


53,345Proceeds from financings, net:Mortgage loans payable


15,178


Credit facility payable


7,744


Offering costs paid


(15,407
)

(5,467
)Distributions on common stock paid in cash


(4,970
)

(1,922
)Redemptions of common stock


(11
)

Cash provided by financing activities


141,987


45,956Net change in cash and cash equivalents


57,130


43,689Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


77,540


23,771Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
134,670

$
67,460


See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

---





Table of Contents



Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements        (Unaudited)

1. Organization and Business



Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc. (which, together with its subsidiaries as the context requires, may be referred to as
the "Company," "we," "us," or "our") was organized in Maryland on August 4, 2006 and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for federal
income tax purposes. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to corporate-level income taxes. To maintain our REIT status, we are required, among other requirements, to distribute annually at least
90% of our "REIT taxable income," as defined by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be
subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. As of March 31, 2010, we believe we are in compliance with all applicable REIT requirements.

We
invest in and operate high quality multifamily communities. These multifamily communities include conventional multifamily assets, such as mid-rise, high-rise,
and garden style properties, and may also include student housing and age-restricted properties, typically requiring residents to be age 55 or older. Our targeted communities include
existing "core" properties that are already stabilized and producing rental income as well as more opportunistic properties in various phases of development, redevelopment, lease up or repositioning.
Further, we may invest in other types of commercial real estate, real estate-related securities, mortgage, bridge, mezzanine or other loans and Section 1031
tenant-in-common interests, or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing. We completed our first investment in April 2007 and, as of March 31, 2010, we
have made wholly owned or equity investments in 23 multifamily communities of which 11 are stabilized operating properties and 12 are in various stages of lease up. We have made and intend to continue
making investments both in wholly owned investments and through co-investment arrangements with other participants ("Co-Investment Ventures").

We
have no employees and are supported by related party service agreements. We are externally managed by Behringer Harvard Multifamily Advisors I, LLC ("Behringer Harvard
Multifamily Advisors I" or the "Advisor"), a Texas limited liability company. The Advisor is responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and for identifying and
making real estate investments on our behalf. Substantially all our business is conducted through our indirectly wholly owned operating partnership, Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP, a
Delaware limited partnership ("Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I"). Our wholly owned subsidiary, BHMF, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("BHMF Inc.") owns less than 0.1% of Behringer
Harvard Multifamily OP I as its sole general partner. The remaining ownership interest in Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I is held as a limited partner's interest by our wholly owned subsidiary BHMF
Business Trust, a Maryland business trust.



On November 22, 2006, we commenced a private offering pursuant to Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Securities Act") to sell a maximum of approximately $400 million of common stock to accredited investors (the "Private Offering"). We terminated the Private Offering on
December 28, 2007. We sold a total of approximately 14.2 million shares of common stock and raised a total of approximately $127.3 million in gross offering proceeds in the
Private Offering. Net proceeds after selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and other offering costs were approximately $114.3 million.

7

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Business (Continued)

On
September 5, 2008, we commenced our initial public offering (the "Initial Public Offering") of up to 200 million shares of common stock offered at a price of $10.00 per
share pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed under the Securities Act. The Initial Public Offering also covered the registration of up to an additional
50 million shares of common stock at a price of $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan ("DRIP"). We reserve the right to reallocate shares of our common stock between
the primary offering and our DRIP. As of March 31, 2010, we have sold a total of approximately 57.7 million shares of common stock and raised a total of approximately
$575.1 million in gross offering proceeds in the Initial Public Offering. Net proceeds, after selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and other offering costs were approximately
$504.4 million.

Our
common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange. However, management anticipates within four to six years after the termination of our Initial Public Offering
to begin the process of either listing the common stock on a national securities exchange or liquidating our assets, depending on then-prevailing market conditions.



Certain financial information from the previous period has been revised to conform to the current period presentation. For the
December 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheet, due to the increasing amount of intangibles, we separately disclosed intangibles of $1.2 million, previously included in other assets. This
revision to the historical presentation does not reflect a material change to the information presented in the consolidated balance sheet.

2. Interim Unaudited Financial Information

The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 which was filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 31, 2010. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted from this report.

The
results for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of future financial results. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet and consolidated
statement of stockholders' equity as of March 31, 2010 and consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 have not been audited by our
independent registered public accounting firm. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary to present fairly our
consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and our consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

We
have evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure in our consolidated financial statements.

8

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include such items as: the purchase price allocation for real estate acquisitions; impairment of long-lived assets, notes receivable
and equity-method real estate investments; fair value evaluations; revenue recognition of note receivable interest income and equity in earnings of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures; depreciation and amortization; and allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of variable interest entities in which we are the primary
beneficiary and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control. All inter-company transactions, balances and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Interests in entities are
evaluated based on applicable GAAP, which requires the consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIEs") in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. If the interest in the entity is
determined to not be a VIE, then the entities are evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control and/or substantive participation rights
under the respective ownership agreement.

There
are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we will make an investment will be VIE and if so, if we will be the primary beneficiary. The entity will
be evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity. There are some guidelines as to what the
minimum equity at risk should be, but the percentage can vary depending upon the industry or the type of operations of the entity and it will be up to our Advisor to determine that minimum percentage
as it relates to our business and the facts surrounding each of our acquisitions. In addition, even if the entity's equity at risk is a very low percentage, our Advisor will be required to evaluate
the equity at risk compared to the entity's expected future losses to determine if there could still in fact be sufficient equity in the entity. Determining expected future losses involves assumptions
of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses
and allocating those losses between the equity owners, subordinated lenders or other variable interests. The determination will also be based on an evaluation of the voting rights of partners in
relation to their economic participation in benefits or obligation to absorb losses. As partnership agreements have various terms which may change over time or based on future results, these
evaluations require complex analysis and weighting of different factors. A change in the judgments, assumptions, allocations and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that
should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment on the equity
method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

For
other investments, we must evaluate whether we have control of an entity, where there are judgments involved in determining if provisions in governing agreements provide protective
or

9

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

participating
rights for us, our Co-Investment Ventures or other equity owners. This evaluation includes an assessment of multiple terms as to their economic effect to the operations of
the entity, how relevant the term is to the recurring operations of the entity and the weighing of each item to determine in the aggregate which owner, if any, has control. These assessments would
affect whether an entity should be consolidated or reported on the equity method, the effects of which could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.



For real estate properties acquired by us or our Co-Investment Ventures classified as business combinations, we allocate
the purchase price, after adjusting for settlement of any pre-existing relationships, to the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land, inclusive of associated rights, and buildings,
any assumed debt, identified intangible assets and liabilities and asset retirement obligations based on their fair values. Identified intangible assets and liabilities primarily consist of the fair
value of in-place leases and contractual rights. Goodwill is recognized as of the acquisition date and measured as the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any
noncontrolling interests in the acquiree over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Likewise, a bargain purchase gain is recognized in current earnings when the aggregate fair value of
the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree are less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.

The
fair value of any tangible assets acquired, expected to consist of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the
"as-if-vacant" value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements. Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less
depreciation or estimates of the relative fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods. Buildings are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from 25
to 35 years using the straight-line method. Improvements are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 15 years using the straight-line
method. When we acquire rights to use land or improvements through contractual rights rather than fee simple interests, we determine the value of the use of these assets based on the relative fair
value of the assets after considering the contractual rights and the fair value of similar assets. Assets acquired under these contractual rights are classified as intangibles and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of the contractual term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Contractual rights related to land or air rights that are substantively
separated from depreciating assets are amortized over the life of the contractual term or, if no term is provided, are classified as indefinite-lived intangibles. Indefinite-lived intangible assets
are evaluated at each reporting period to determine whether the indefinite useful life is appropriate.

We
determine the value of in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and our overall
relationship with that respective tenant. The aggregate value of in-place leases and tenant relationships was determined by applying a fair value model. The estimates of fair value of
in-place leases includes an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods for the respective units considering current market conditions. In estimating fair
value of in-place leases, we consider items such as real estate taxes, insurance, leasing commissions, legal expenses, tenant improvements and other operating expenses to execute similar

10

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

deals
as well as projected rental revenue and carrying costs during the expected lease-up period. The estimate of the fair value of tenant relationships also includes our estimate of the
likelihood of renewal.

We
determine the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks
associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) estimates of current market
lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the
remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or
intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the above determined lease term.

We
amortize the value of in-place leases acquired to expense over the remaining term of the leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles will be amortized to expense
over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods, but in no event will the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Intangible lease
assets are classified as intangibles and intangible lease liabilities are recorded within deferred lease revenues and other related liabilities.

We
determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled debt service payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities that management believes we could obtain. Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining
life of the loan.

Initial
valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than 12 months from the acquisition date. We have had no significant valuation
changes for acquisitions prior to March 31, 2010.



For properties wholly owned by us or our Co-Investment Ventures, including all related intangibles, we monitor events and
changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment
by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset including its eventual disposition, to the carrying amount of the asset. In the
event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value. In
addition, we evaluate indefinite-lived intangible assets for possible impairment at least annually by comparing the fair values with the carrying values. Fair value is generally estimated by valuation
of similar assets.

For
real estate we own through an investment in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture or other similar real estate investment structure, at each reporting date we compare the
estimated fair value of our real estate investment to the carrying value. An impairment charge is recorded to the extent the fair value of our real estate investment is less than the carrying amount
and the decline in value is determined to be other than a temporary decline. We did not record any impairment losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009.

11

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)



We consider investments in bank deposits, money market funds and highly-liquid cash investments with original maturities of three
months or less to be cash equivalents.



Notes receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and
costs. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to interest income over the lives of the related loans.

In
accounting for notes receivable by us or our Co-Investment Ventures, we evaluate whether the investments are loans, investments in joint ventures or acquisitions of real
estate. In addition, we evaluate whether the loans contain any rights to participate in expected residual profits, provide sufficient collateral or qualifying guarantees or include other
characteristics of a loan. As a result of our review, neither our wholly owned loan nor the loans made through our Co-Investment Ventures contain a right to participate in expected
residual profits. In addition, the project borrowers remain obligated to pay principal and interest due on the loan with sufficient collateral, reserves or qualifying guarantees.

We
assess notes receivable for impairment in accordance with applicable GAAP. Based on specific circumstances, we determine whether it is probable that there has been an adverse change
in the estimated cash flows of the contractual payments for the notes receivable. We then assess the impairment based on the probability of collecting all contractual amounts. If the impairment is
probable, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between our or the Co-Investment Venture's investment in the note receivable and the present value of the estimated cash
flows discounted at the note receivable's effective interest rate. Where we have the intent and the ability to foreclose on our security interest in the property, we will use the collateral's fair
value as a basis for the impairment.

There
are judgments involved in determining the probability for an impairment to collect contractual amounts. As these types of notes receivable are generally investment specific based
on the particular loan terms and the underlying project characteristics, there is usually no secondary market to evaluate impairments. Accordingly, we must rely on our subjective judgments and
individual weightings of the specific factors. If notes receivable are considered impaired, then judgments and estimates are required to determine the projected cash flows for the notes receivable,
considering the borrower's or, if applicable, the guarantor's financial condition and the consideration and valuation of the secured property and any other collateral. Changes in these facts or in our
judgments and assessments of these facts could result in impairment losses which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.



We or our Co-Investment Ventures account for certain investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures using the
equity method of accounting because we exercise significant influence over, but do not control, these entities. These investments are initially recorded at cost and are adjusted for our share of
equity in earnings and distributions. We report our share of income and losses based on our economic interests in the entities.

12

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

We
capitalized interest expense to investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures for our share of qualified expenditures.

We
amortize any excess of the carrying value of our investments in joint ventures over the book value of the underlying equity over the estimated useful lives of the underlying operating
property, which represents the assets to which the excess is most clearly related.

When
we or our Co-Investment Ventures acquire a controlling interest in a previously noncontrolled investment, a gain or loss is recognized for the differences between the
investment's carrying value and fair value.



Deferred financing costs are recorded at cost and are amortized to interest expense using a straight-line method that
approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related debt.



Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents or commercial tenants, generally on a monthly
basis. Rental revenues for leases with uneven payments and terms greater than one year are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Any deferred revenue is recorded
as a liability within deferred lease revenues and other related liabilities.



Acquisition costs for business combinations, which are expected to include most wholly owned properties, are expensed when it is
probable that the transaction will be accounted for as a business combination and the purchase will be consummated. Acquisition costs related to investments in unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures are capitalized as a part of our basis in the investment. Pursuant to our Advisory Management Agreement (as defined below), our Advisor is obligated to reimburse us for all investment-related
expenses the Company pursues but ultimately does not consummate. Prior to the determination of its status, amounts incurred are recorded in other assets. Acquisition costs and expenses include amounts
incurred with our Advisor and with third parties.



Our Advisor is obligated to pay all of our Initial Public Offering and Private Offering organization and offering costs and we are
required to make reimbursements in accordance with the Advisory Management Agreement, as amended. Organization expenses are expensed as incurred. Offering costs are recognized based on estimated
amounts probable of reimbursement and are offset against additional paid-in capital.



We account for the possible redemption of our shares by classifying securities that are convertible for cash at the option of the
holder outside of equity. We do not reclassify the shares to be redeemed

13

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

from
equity to a liability until such time as the redemption has been formally approved. The portion of the redeemed common stock in excess of the par value is charged to additional
paid-in capital.



We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code and have qualified as a REIT since the year
ended December 31, 2007. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable
income to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level. We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT
under the Code and intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to remain qualified as a REIT.

We
have evaluated the current and deferred income tax related to state taxes, where we do not have a REIT exemption, and we have no significant tax liability or benefit as of
March 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.

We
recognize the financial statement benefit of an uncertain tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following
an audit. As of March 31, 2010, we have no significant uncertain tax positions.



We have a stock-based incentive award plan for our directors and consultants and for employees, directors and consultants of our
affiliates, and our Advisor. Awards are granted at the fair market value on the date of grant with fair value estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model, which incorporates
assumptions surrounding volatility, dividend yield, the risk-free interest rate, expected life, and the exercise price as compared to the underlying stock price on the grant date. The tax
benefits associated with these stock-based payments are to be classified as financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

We
have issued a total of 6,000 shares of restricted stock to our independent directors. These restricted shares are fully vested. The fair value of the restricted stock was recognized
as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the required service period. We have not recognized any significant compensation expense.



We invest our cash and cash equivalents between several banking institutions and money market accounts in an attempt to minimize
exposure to any one of these entities. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of
federally-insured levels. We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents.

14

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)



Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated similarly, except that during periods of net income it includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of securities,
including the effect of shares issuable under our stock-based incentive plans. During periods of net loss, the assumed exercise of securities is anti-dilutive and is not included in the
calculation of earnings per share.

The
Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Award Plan ("Incentive Award Plan") authorizes the grant of non-qualified and
incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards. A total of 10 million shares has been
authorized and reserved for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan. As of March 31, 2010, no options have been issued. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, 6,000 shares of the restricted
stock have been included in the basic and dilutive earnings per share calculation.

As
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had 1,000 shares of convertible stock issued and outstanding, no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding, and had no
options to purchase shares of common stock outstanding. The convertible stock is not included in the dilutive earnings per share because the shares of convertible stock do not participate in earnings
and would currently not be convertible into any common shares, if converted.



Our current business consists of investing in and operating multifamily communities. Substantially all of our consolidated net income
is from investments in real estate properties that we wholly own or own through Co-Investment Ventures, the latter of which we account for under the equity method of accounting. Our
management evaluates operating performance on an individual investment level. However, as each of our investments has similar economic characteristics in our consolidated financial statements, the
Company is managed on an enterprise-wide basis with one reportable segment.



In connection with our assessments and determinations of fair value for many real estate assets and financial instruments, there are
generally not available observable market price inputs for substantially the same items. Accordingly, our Advisor makes assumptions and uses various estimates and pricing models, including, but not
limited to, the estimated useful lives of the assets, the cost of replacing certain assets, discount and interest rates used to determine present values and market rental rates. Many of these
estimates are from the perspective of market participants and will also be obtained from independent third-party appraisals. However, we will be responsible for the source and use of these estimates.
A change in these estimates and assumptions could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

As
of March 31, 2010, we believe the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, note receivable, receivables and payables from affiliates and credit facility payable
approximate their fair values. As of March 31, 2010, we estimate the fair value of our mortgage loans payable at $92.8 million, compared to

15

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

its
carrying value of $93.8 million. As of March 31, 2009, we did not have any mortgage loans payable. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had no assets or
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis.

4. New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an amendment to the authoritative guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. This guidance
eliminates exceptions to consolidating qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the
primary beneficiary, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This guidance also contains a new
requirement that any term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect on an entity's status as a variable interest entity, a company's power over a variable interest entity,
or a company's obligation to absorb losses or its rights to receive benefits of an entity must be disregarded in evaluating whether an entity is a variable interest entity. This guidance was
applicable to us beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

5. Real Estate Investments

We make real estate investments through entities wholly owned by us or through unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. As of March 31, 2010, we had five wholly owned real
estate investments and 18 investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. As of December 31, 2009, we had three wholly owned real estate investments and 17 investments in
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. All of our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures are BHMP CO-JVs (as defined below). We are not limited to joint ventures
through BHMP CO-JVs, as we may choose other joint venture partners or investment structures.

The
following presents our wholly owned real estate investments and our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The investments are categorized as of March 31, 2010 based on the type of investment, on the stages in the development and operation of the investment and for investments in unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures based on its type of underlying investment. The definitions of each stage are as follows:



16

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

Occupancy
data is presented upon stabilization of the property and is as of March 31, 2010.

Total Real Estate, net
(in millions)Investments in Real Estate

Location

Purchase Date

Units

Occupancy Rate

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009Stabilized / Non-comparable:The Gallery at NoHo Commons(1)

Los Angeles, CA

3rd Quarter 2009


438


91
%
$
105.4

$
106.0Mariposa Loft Apartments

Atlanta, GA

3rd Quarter 2009


253


94
%

27.7


27.9Grand Reserve Orange

Orange, CT

4th Quarter 2009


168


91
%

24.9


25.1Acacia on Santa Rosa Creek

Santa Rosa, CA

1st Quarter 2010


277


96
%

37.3


The Lofts at Park Crest(2)

McLean, VA

1st Quarter 2010


131


91
%

49.5


1,267




$
244.8

$
159.0




Our Investment in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures
(in millions)Acquisition, Completion, or Estimated Future Completion DateInvestments in Unconsolidated
Real Estate Joint Ventures(3)

Location

Units

Occupancy Rate

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009Equity InvestmentsStabilized / Comparable:The Reserve at Johns Creek Walk(4)

Johns Creek, GA

3rd Quarter 2007


210

97%

$
3.8

$
4.0Stabilized / Non-comparable:Halstead(5)

Houston, TX

2nd Quarter 2009


301

87%


3.3


3.4Waterford Place(5)

Dublin, CA

3rd Quarter 2009


390

93%


10.5


11.0Burrough's Mill Apartment Homes(5)

Cherry Hill, NJ

3rd Quarter 2009


308

93%


7.5


8.1Calypso Apartments and Lofts(5)

Irvine, CA

4th Quarter 2009


177

94%


14.3


27.44550 Cherry Creek(5)

Denver, CO

1st Quarter 2010


288

91%


13.0


Lease ups:The Eclipse(5)

Houston, TX

2nd Quarter 2009


330

N/A


19.0


19.7Forty55 Lofts(5)

Marina del Rey, CA

3rd Quarter 2009


140

N/A


27.0


26.2Cyan/PDX(2)(5)

Portland, OR

4th Quarter 2009


352

N/A


45.8


46.2San Sebastian(5)

Laguna Woods, CA

4th Quarter 2009


134

N/A


19.7


19.955 Hundred(2)(4)(6)

Arlington, VA

2nd Quarter 2010


234

N/A


23.2


23.6Bailey's Crossing(4)(6)

Alexandria, VA

2nd Quarter 2010


414

N/A


29.7


29.8Equity and Loan InvestmentsLease ups:The Venue(4)(6)

Clark County, NV

4th Quarter 2009


168

N/A


4.3


4.5Satori(2)(4)(6)

Fort Lauderdale, FL

2nd Quarter 2010


279

N/A


11.9


12.3Skye 2905(2)(4)(6)

Denver, CO

4th Quarter 2010


400

N/A


12.7


12.9Veritas(4)(6)

Henderson, NV

1st Quarter 2011


430

N/A


14.7


14.9Loan InvestmentsLease ups:Grand Reserve(6)

Dallas, TX

1st Quarter 2010


149

N/A


5.2


5.1The Cameron(2)(6)

Silver Spring, MD

2nd Quarter 2010


325

N/A


10.9


10.95,029



$
276.5

$
279.9Total Units


6,296


(1)Purchase
price for The Gallery at NoHo Commons was $96.0 million, before closing costs and prorations.(2)Includes
retail space, where the total approximate square footage of retail space of gross leasable area ("GLA") for all these investments totals
approximately 100,000 square feet, approximately 6% of total rentable area. Of the stabilized


17

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

communities,
only The Lofts at Park Crest contain any retail space with approximately 67,000 square feet, all of which was leased as of March 31, 2010. (3)Our
ownership interest in all our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures is 55% except for The Reserve at Johns Creek Walk (64%) and
Cyan/PDX (70%).(4)Equity
investment of a BHMP CO-JV in a Property Entity with unaffiliated third parties.(5)Equity
investment wholly owned by a BHMP CO-JV.(6)Equity
interests in the property owned by BHMP CO-JV and/or other owners may be subject to call rights, put rights and/or buy-sell
rights and/or right of BHMP CO-JV to convert mezzanine loan investment to equity in the property.




In the three months ended March 31, 2010, we acquired in separate transactions two wholly owned multifamily communities, Acacia
on Santa Rosa Creek and The Lofts at Park Crest, totaling 408 units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $106.8 million, including assumption of a mortgage loan payable of
$26.7 million.

The
following tables present certain additional information regarding our material 2010 acquisition, The Lofts at Park Crest, acquired in March 2010. The amounts recognized for major
assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date are as follows (in millions):

The Lofts at
Park CrestBuildings and improvements

$
49.6Intangible assets:In place lease


2.7Contractual rights


16.3Total intangible assets


19.0Contingent consideration liability


(0.4
)Total

$
68.2




The
amounts recognized for revenues and net losses assumed from the acquisition date to March 31, 2010 related to the operations of the Lofts at Park Crest acquisition is as
follows (in millions):

The Lofts at
Park CrestRevenues

$
0.3Net loss

$
(0.4
)




18

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

The
following unaudited consolidated pro forma information is presented as if we acquired The Lofts at Park Crest on January 1, 2009. This information is not necessarily
indicative of what the actual results of operations would have been had we completed these transactions on January 1, 2009, nor does it purport to represent our future operations (amounts in
millions, expect per share):

Pro FormaFor the Three Months Ended March 31,2010

2009Revenue

$
6.1

$
1.2Net loss

$
(7.3
)
$
(1.9
)Net loss per share

$
(0.11
)
$
(0.08
)




Depreciation
expense associated with all of our wholly owned buildings and improvements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $1.8 million. We did not
have any wholly owned multifamily communities subject to depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Cost
of intangibles related to our wholly owned investments in real estate consisted of the value of in-place leases and other contractual intangibles. Included in other
contractual intangibles as of March 31, 2010 is $6.8 million related to the use rights of a parking garage and site improvements and $9.5 million of indefinite-lived contractual
rights related to land air rights. There were no indefinite-lived intangibles as of December 31, 2009 or March 31, 2009. Anticipated amortization associated with lease and other
contractual intangibles for each of the following five years is as follows (in millions):

April - December 2010

$
1.62011

$
0.42012

$
0.42013

$
0.42014

$
0.4


19

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

As
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to our consolidated real estate properties and related intangibles were as
follows (in millions):

IntangiblesAs of March 31, 2010

Buildings and Improvements

In-Place Lease Intangibles

Other ContractualCost

$
200.9

$
6.2

$
16.3Less: depreciation and amortization


(3.3
)

(2.8
)

Net

$
197.6

$
3.4

$
16.3




IntangiblesAs of December 31, 2009

Buildings and Improvements

In-Place Lease Intangibles

Other ContractualCost

$
121.4

$
2.4

$
Less: depreciation and amortization


(1.5
)

(1.2
)

Net

$
119.9

$
1.2

$





We have entered into 18 separate joint ventures with Behringer Harvard Master Partnership I LP (the "BHMP
Co-Investment Partner") through entities in which we are the manager. The 1% general partner of the BHMP Co-Investment Partner is Behringer Harvard
Institutional GP LP, which is an affiliate of our Advisor and is indirectly owned by our sponsor, Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC. The 99% limited partner of the BHMP
Co-Investment Partner is Stichting Depositary PGGM Private Real Estate Fund, a Dutch foundation acting in its capacity as depositary of and for the account and risk of PGGM Private Real
Estate Fund, an investment vehicle for Dutch pension funds ("PGGM"). Substantially all of the capital provided to the BHMP Co-Investment Partner is from PGGM. We have no ownership or other
direct financial interests in either of these entities.

PGGM
has committed to invest up to $300 million in co-investments with affiliates or investment programs of our sponsor. Until the current funding commitment from PGGM
of
$300 million has been placed in co-investments with affiliates or investment programs of our sponsor, to the extent that investments fit within the investment parameters agreed
between the BHMP Co-Investment Partner and our sponsor, we expect a portion of our future real estate acquisitions will be made through co-investments with the BHMP
Co-Investment Partner. Generally, the BHMP Co-Investment Partner will co-invest with a 45% equity interest, and we will co-invest with a 55% equity
interest, although the BHMP Co-Investment Partner may elect smaller allocations. Cash distributions are allocated pro rata based on each partner's capital investments.

Each
of our separate joint ventures with the BHMP Co-Investment Partner is made through a separate entity that owns 100% of the voting equity interests and approximately 99%
of the economic interests in one subsidiary REIT, through which substantially all of the joint venture's business is conducted. Each separate joint venture entity, together with its respective
subsidiary REIT, is referred to herein as a "BHMP CO-JV." Each BHMP CO-JV is a separate legal entity formed for the sole purpose

20

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

of
holding its respective investment and obtaining legally separated debt and equity financing. In certain circumstances the governing documents of the BHMP CO-JV may require the
subsidiary REIT to be disposed of via a sale of its capital stock rather than as an asset sale by that subsidiary REIT.

Each
BHMP CO-JV is managed by us or a subsidiary of ours, but the operation of the BHMP CO-JV's investment must generally be conducted in accordance with
operating plans approved by the BHMP Co-Investment Partner. In addition, without the consent of all members of the BHMP CO-JV, the manager may not generally approve or
disapprove on behalf of the BHMP CO-JV certain major decisions affecting the BHMP CO-JV, such as (i) selling or otherwise disposing of the BHMP CO-JV's
investment or any other property having a value in excess of $100,000, (ii) selling any additional interests in the BHMP CO-JV, (iii) approving initial and annual operating
plans and capital expenditures or (iv) incurring or materially modifying any indebtedness of the BHMP CO-JV in excess of $100,000 or causing the BHMP CO-JV to become
liable for any debt, obligation or undertaking of any other individual or entity in excess of $100,000 other than in accordance with the operating plans. The BHMP Co-Investment Partner may
remove the manager for cause and appoint a successor. Distributions of net cash flow from the BHMP CO-JV will be distributed to the members no less than quarterly in accordance with the
members' ownership interests. BHMP CO-JV capital contributions and distributions are made pro rata in accordance with ownership interests.

We
have determined that our BHMP CO-JVs are not variable interest entities and that each partner has equal substantive control and participating rights with no single party
controlling each BHMP CO-JV. Accordingly, we account for our interest in each BHMP CO-JV using the equity method of accounting.

Certain
BHMP CO-JVs have made equity investments with third-party partners in, and/or have made loans to, entities that own one multifamily operating or development
community. The collective group of these operating property entities or development entities are collectively referred to herein as "Property Entities." Each Property Entity is a separate legal entity
for the sole purpose of holding its respective operating property or development project and obtaining legally separated debt and equity financing.

As
of March 31, 2010, seven of our BHMP CO-JVs include equity investments in Property Entities. Each of these BHMP CO-JV equity investments in a Property
Entity is evaluated for consolidation at the BHMP CO-JV level using our principles of consolidation. Of these seven Property Entities, three investments are reported on a consolidated
basis by the BHMP CO-JV and the remaining four investments are recorded as unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and reported with the equity method of accounting by the respective
BHMP CO-JVs.

During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, we invested in one newly formed BHMP CO-JV, which holds a wholly owned multifamily community, 4550 Cherry Creek. Our
share of the capital contribution was $28.6 million. Also during the three months ended March 31, 2010, the 4550 Cherry Creek and Calypso Apartments and Lofts BHMP CO-JVs
separately obtained mortgage financing totaling $52.6 million and distributed substantially all of the net proceeds to us and the BHMP Co-Investment Partner. Our share of the
distributions was approximately $28.3 million and is classified as a return of investment in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures on the consolidated statement of cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2010.

21

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

The
summarized financial data shown below presents the combined accounts of each of the (i) BHMP CO-JVs and (ii) Property Entities where there is a
corresponding BHMP CO-JV equity investment. The Property Entities include 100% of their accounts, where the noncontrolling interest amounts represent the portion owned by unaffiliated
third parties. All inter-entity transactions, balances and profits have been eliminated in the combined financial data (amounts in millions):

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009Balance Sheet Data:Land, buildings and improvements, net

$
793.2

$
649.3Construction in progress


125.3


210.2Notes receivable, net


25.5


25.4Cash and cash equivalents


6.2


6.2Other assets, including restricted cash


22.7


22.9Total assets

$
972.9

$
914.0BHMP CO-JV level mortgage loans payable

$
162.4

$
110.1Property Entity level construction and mortgage loans payable


305.4


284.3Accounts payable, interest payable and other liabilities


24.6


30.2Total liabilities


492.4


424.6Redeemable, noncontrolling interests


9.8


10.4Our members' equity


264.0


268.5BHMP Co-Investment Partner's equity


197.6


201.2Nonredeemable, noncontrolling interests


9.1


9.3Total equity


470.7


479.0Total liabilities and equity

$
972.9

$
914.0


22

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

For the Three Months Ended March 31,2010

2009Operating Data:RevenuesRental revenues

$
10.9

$
1.0Interest income


2.4


3.413.3


4.4ExpensesProperty operating expenses


5.2


0.9Real estate taxes


1.7


0.2Interest expense


3.7


0.6Acquisition expenses


0.4


Depreciation and amortization


8.8


0.719.8


2.4Net income (loss)


(6.5
)

2.0Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests


0.9


0.1Net income (loss) attributable to consolidated BHMP CO-JV

$
(5.6
)
$
2.1Our share of equity in earnings (loss) of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures

$
(3.2
)
$
1.1


The
following presents the reconciliation between our member's equity interest in the combined BHMP CO-JVs and our total investments in unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures (amounts in millions):

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009Balance of our member's equity in the BHMP CO-JVs

$
264.0

$
268.5Other capitalized costs, net of amortization


12.5


11.4Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures

$
276.5

$
279.9


Included
in the combined financial data are certain notes receivable from Property Entities to BHMP CO-JVs in various stages of lease up or development. All note receivable
advances have reached their required maximum funding amounts; however for The Cameron note receivable, the BHMP CO-JV has elected to make additional net protective advances of
$1.7 million, which were prefundings of construction loan draws and are expected to be repaid when the construction loan draws are funded. Subsequent to March 31, 2010, substantially all
of the protective advances were repaid by The Cameron Property Entity. In connection with each of the notes receivable included in the combined financial data, the BHMP CO-JVs acquired
options to purchase a certain percentage ownership interest in the Property Entity, or to convert the notes receivable into equity interests in the Property Entities. Options are generally exercisable
during defined periods after project completion.

23

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

Below
are the BHMP CO-JVs' notes receivable from the Property Entities that are included in the combined financial data (amounts in millions):

Carrying AmountName of Underlying Property

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009

Fixed Interest Rate

Maturity Date

Option Period Commencement After ConstructionGrand Reserve

$
7.5

$
7.5


10.0
%
April 2012

120 days after the earlier of 1 year
or 90% occupiedThe Cameron


19.3


19.3


9.5
%
December 2012

90 daysTotal BHMP CO-JV Notes


26.8


26.8Less: Deferred Financing Fees


(1.3
)

(1.4
)Net BHMP CO-JV Notes

$
25.5

$
25.4


In
the combined financial data, the notes receivable and notes payable between the BHMP CO-JVs and their Property Entities in which the BHMP CO-JVs have equity
interests are eliminated. For these notes, all advances have reached their required maximum funding amounts. Other than with respect to The Venue, in connection with each of these notes receivable or
their equity investment, the BHMP CO-JVs acquired options to purchase a certain percentage ownership interest in the Property Entity, or to convert the notes receivable into equity
interests in the Property Entities. Options are generally exercisable during defined periods after project completion. Below are the eliminated BHMP CO-JVs' notes receivable (amounts in
millions):

Carrying AmountName of Underlying Property

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009

Fixed Interest Rate

Maturity Date

Option Period Commencement After ConstructionSatori

$
14.8

$
14.8


10.0
%
October 2012

90 daysSkye 2905


14.8


14.8


10.0
%
April 2013

90 daysThe Venue


5.8


5.8


10.0
%
June 2013

N/AVeritas


21.0


21.0


13.0
%
December 2013

90 daysTotal BHMP CO-JV Notes Receivable Eliminated in Combination

$
56.4

$
56.4


As
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, BHMP CO-JVs are also subject to senior mortgage loans payable as described in the following table. These loans are
senior to the equity investments by the BHMP CO-JVs. The lenders for these mortgage loans payable have no recourse to us or the applicable BHMP CO-JV other than
carve-out guarantees for certain matters such as environmental

24

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

conditions,
misuse of funds and material misrepresentations. These mortgage loan payables are referred to as BHMP CO-JV level mortgage loans payable (amounts in millions):

BHMP CO-JV Level Mortgage Loans Payable

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009

Interest Rate

Maturity DateHalstead

$
24.0

$
24.0

6.17% - Fixed

September 2011Waterford Place


59.8


60.1

4.83% - Fixed

May 20134550 Cherry Creek


28.6




4.23% - Fixed

March 2015Calypso Apartments and Lofts


24.0




4.21% - Fixed

March 2015Burrough's Mill Apartment Homes


26.0


26.0

5.29% - Fixed

October 2016Total

$
162.4

$
110.1


As
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Property Entities are subject to senior construction and mortgage loans payable as described in the following table. These loans
are senior to any equity or debt investments by the BHMP CO-JVs. The lenders for these loans have no recourse to us or the BHMP CO-JVs with recourse only to the applicable
Property Entities and with respect to Satori, Skye 2905, The Venue and Veritas to affiliates of the project developers that have provided completion and repayment guarantees. These loans payable are
referred to as Property Entity level construction and mortgage loans payable (amounts in millions):

Property Entity Level Construction and Mortgage Loans Payable

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009

Interest Rate

Maturity DateSatori

$
69.4

$
69.4

Monthly LIBOR + 140 bps

October 2010Skye 2905


52.0


42.2

Monthly LIBOR + 195 bps

May 2011Bailey's Crossing


64.6


61.1

Monthly LIBOR + 275 bps

November 2011The Venue


19.5


19.2

Monthly LIBOR + 225 bps

June 2012Veritas


24.2


16.7

Monthly LIBOR + 275 bps

December 2012The Reserve at Johns Creek Walk


23.0


23.0

6.46% - Fixed

March 201355 Hundred


52.7


52.7

Monthly LIBOR + 300 bps

November 2013Total

$
305.4

$
284.3




As
of March 31, 2010, approximately $993.1 million of the net carrying value of land, buildings and improvements and construction in progress collateralized the combined
BHMP CO-JV level and Property Entity level construction and mortgage loans payable.

Each
of the Property Entity level construction loans are used to fund development projects and are drawn as construction costs are incurred. The aggregate total commitment, if fully
funded, is $330.7 million. Each construction loan has provisions allowing for extensions, generally two, one-year options if certain operational performance levels have been
achieved as of the maturity date. An extension fee, generally 0.25% of the total loan balance, is required for each extension.

In
December 2009, Fairfield Residential LLC, a real estate operating company, ("Fairfield Residential") and certain of its affiliates filed for voluntary bankruptcy. Certain other
affiliates of Fairfield Residential that serve as the general partner for The Cameron and current limited partners of

25

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

5. Real Estate Investments (Continued)

Bailey's
Crossing and 55 Hundred were not part of the bankruptcy filing (the "Fairfield Projects"). The Bailey's Crossing, 55 Hundred and The Cameron Property Entities were also not a
part of the bankruptcy filing. The Bailey's Crossing and 55 Hundred Property Entity restructurings and
recapitalizations were completed prior to Fairfield Residential's bankruptcy and were not affected by the bankruptcy filing.

Because
Fairfield Residential has guaranteed repayment of The Cameron senior construction loan, as well as completion of the project for the senior construction loan, Fairfield
Residential's bankruptcy gave rise to an event of default under The Cameron senior construction loan agreement. As a result, The Cameron senior construction lender sent a default notice to The Cameron
Property Entity. These events in turn gave rise to an event of default under the BHMP CO-JV note receivable. To preserve its rights, the BHMP CO-JV also served a default notice
to The Cameron Property Entity related to its $19.3 million mezzanine loan. Through March 2010, the senior construction lender has continued to fund construction draws and has not exercised any
of its default remedies. If the senior construction lender did exercise its default remedies, we expect to have an opportunity to (a) cure the default, (b) purchase the senior
construction loan or (c) otherwise negotiate a solution acceptable to the senior construction lender. However, there is no assurance that we would be able to restructure the senior construction
loan including associated guarantees on terms that are acceptable to The Cameron Property Entity owners and us. Such restructuring could include a pay down of the senior construction loan by The
Cameron Property Entity and/or the BHMP CO-JV, which could result in a capital contribution by us to The Cameron BHMP CO-JV. In addition, the senior construction lender's
exercise of default remedies or the results of any restructuring negotiations may change our analysis of the accounting for the investment, which could result in the BHMP CO-JV accounting
for the investment as joint venture, or if the BHMP CO-JV is viewed as the primary beneficiary, to consolidate the investment. However, we believe we have sufficient collateral,
contractual remedies and other creditor rights for us to recover all of our investment in the development project.

As
of March 31, 2010, management's assessment related to The Cameron BHMP CO-JV is that the loan investment is still properly accounted for as a loan. The continuation
of this accounting treatment is dependent on the resolution of the issues described above, and there can be no assurance as new facts and circumstances arise that different accounting would not be
required. A change in accounting could affect our recognition of earnings in future periods. As of March 31, 2010, no impairment charges related to our investments with respect to any of the
Fairfield Projects have been recorded.

26

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

6. Leasing Activity

Future minimum base rental payments due to us under non-cancelable leases in effect as
of March 31, 2010 for our wholly owned multifamily communities are as follows (in millions):

Future Minimum
Lease PaymentsApril 1, 2010 - December 31, 2010

$
1.62011


2.12012


2.12013


2.12014


2.1Thereafter


28.5Total

$
38.5


The
future minimum lease payments in the above table relate to a retail lease.

7. Note and Other Receivables

As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have approximately $2.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively, in a note receivable. The note is secured by
the Grand Reserve Property Entity, bears interest at 10.0%, and is due April 2012. We have fully funded our loan commitment. Our note receivable is junior to a loan by the BHMP CO-JV.

As
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have a receivable of approximately $1.6 million related to a tax increment receivable from the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Los Angeles, net of imputed discount. The tax increment receivable is collectable from real estate taxes through 2028 as defined in the agreement with the Community
Redevelopment Agency. This receivable was acquired in connection with our acquisition of The Gallery at NoHo Commons.

8. Mortgage Loans Payable

The following presents the carrying amounts of the mortgage loans payable as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (amounts in millions).

Loan AmountMortgage Loans Payable

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009

Loan Type

Interest Rate

Maturity DateAcacia on Santa Rosa Creek

$
26.7

$


Principal and interest

4.63% - fixed

May 2013The Gallary at NoHo Commons


51.3


51.3

Interest-only

4.72% - fixed

November 2016Mariposa Loft Apartments


15.8




Interest-only

5.21% - fixed

March 2017Total

$
93.8

$
51.3


As of March 31, 2010, $170.4 million of the net carrying value of real estate collateralized the mortgage loans payable.

27

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

8. Mortgage Loans Payable (Continued)

Contractual
principal payments for each of the five years from March 31, 2010 are as follows (in millions):

April 1, 2010 - December 31, 2010

$
0.42011


0.62012


0.62013


25.12014


Thereafter


67.1Total

$
93.8


9. Credit Facility Payable

On March 26, 2010, we closed on a $150.0 million credit facility. The credit facility matures on April 1, 2017, when all unpaid principal and interest is due.
Borrowing tranches under the credit facility bear interest at a "base rate" based on either the one-month or three-month LIBOR rate, selected at our option, plus an applicable margin. As
of March 31, 2010, the applicable margin was 2.08% and the base rate was 2.33% based on one-month LIBOR. The credit facility also provides for fees based on unutilized amounts and
minimum usage. The unused facility fee is equal to 1% per annum of the total commitment less the greater of 75% of the total commitment or the actual
amount outstanding. The minimum usage fee is equal to 75% of the total credit facility times the lowest applicable margin less the margin portion of interest paid during the calculation period. The
loan requires monthly interest-only payments and monthly or annual payment of fees. We may prepay borrowing tranches at the expiration of the LIBOR interest rate period without any
penalty. Prepayments during a LIBOR interest rate period are subject to a prepayment penalty generally equal to the interest due for the remaining term of the LIBOR interest rate period.

Draws
under the credit facility are secured by a pool of certain multifamily communities directly owned by our subsidiaries, where we may add and remove multifamily communities from the
collateral pool in compliance with the requirements under the credit facility agreement. As of March 31, 2010, $24.9 million of the net carrying value of real estate collateralized the
credit facility. The aggregate borrowings under the credit facility are limited to 70% of the value of the collateral pool, which may be different than the carrying value for financial statement
reporting. As of March 31, 2010, available but undrawn amounts under the credit facility are approximately $7 million.

The
credit facility agreement contains customary provisions with respect to events of default, covenants and borrowing conditions. In particular, the credit facility agreement requires
us to maintain consolidated net worth of at least $150.0 million, liquidity of at least $15.0 million and net operating income of the collateral pool to be no less than 155% of the
facility debt service cost. Certain prepayments may be required upon a breech of covenants or borrowing conditions. We believe we are in compliance with all provisions as of March 31, 2010.

28

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

10. Stockholders' Equity



As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had 71,538,900 and 57,098,265 shares of common stock outstanding,
respectively, including 6,000 shares of restricted stock issued to our independent directors for no cash, and 24,969 shares owned by Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC, for cash of approximately
$0.2 million.

As
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had 1,000 shares of convertible stock owned by our Advisor issued for cash of $1,000. The convertible stock has no voting
rights, other than for certain limited exceptions, and prior to conversion, does not participate in any earnings or distributions. The convertible stock generally is convertible into shares of common
stock with a value equal to 15% of the amount by which (1) our enterprise value at the time of conversion, including the total amount of distributions paid to our stockholders, exceeds
(2) the sum of the aggregate capital invested by our stockholders plus a 7% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on such capital at the time of conversion, on a
cash-on-cash basis. The convertible stock can be converted when the excess value described above is achieved and distributed to stockholders or our common stock is listed on a national
securities exchange. The conversion may also be prorated in the event of a termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Management Agreement (defined below) other than for cause. Management
has determined that the requirements for conversion have not been met as of March 31, 2010. Management reviewed the terms of the underlying convertible stock and determined the fair value
approximated the nominal value paid for the shares at issuance.

As
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Our board of directors has no present plans to issue preferred stock
but may do so with terms established at its discretion and at any time in the future without stockholder approval.



Our board of directors has authorized a share redemption program for stockholders who have held their shares for more than one year,
subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program. Under the share redemption program, the per share redemption price will generally equal 90% of the most recently disclosed
estimated value per share as determined in accordance with our valuation policy. However, under the share redemption program, the cash available for redemption on any particular date will generally be
limited to the proceeds from our DRIP during the period consisting of the preceding four fiscal quarters for which financial statements are available, less any cash already used for redemptions during
the same period, plus, if we had positive cash flows from operating activities during such preceding four fiscal quarters, 1% of all such cash flows during such preceding four fiscal quarters.

For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, our board of directors approved the redemption of approximately 96,815 shares of common stock for approximately $0.8 million of
which 95,632 shares were redeemed for cash of approximately $0.8 million in April 2010. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we redeemed 48,258 shares of common stock for
approximately $0.4 million.



We paid our first distribution effective July 1, 2007.

29

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

10. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

Distributions,
including distributions paid by issuing shares under the DRIP, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009 were as
follows (amounts in millions):

Distributions2010

Declared

PaidFirst Quarter

$
11.1

$
10.22009Fourth Quarter

$
8.7

$
7.8Third Quarter


6.5


5.9Second Quarter


4.6


4.1First Quarter


2.9


2.5Total

$
22.7

$
20.3


11. Commitments and Contingencies

We and/or our Co-Investment Ventures contract with unaffiliated commercial property development companies and provide equity and/or loans for a particular project (our
"Project Commitments"). We generally fund an initial amount under our Project Commitments at contract inception and fund additional amounts as construction progresses, typically spanning one to three
years. As of March 31, 2010, all of our Co-Investment Ventures have been BHMP CO-JVs. As of March 31, 2010, our Co-Investment Ventures have unfunded
commitments to the BHMP CO-JVs of approximately $28.5 million.

The
BHMP CO-JVs may become obligated to purchase all or a portion of the interests on two Property Entities under contingent sell options held by other investors on the
Property Entities: The Cameron and Grand Reserve. The options are generally exercisable after completion of the development and for a period of three years thereafter. The option price is set by
agreement and is either based on the fair value of the project at exercise or the cost of the project as defined in the respective agreement. As this amount is based on future events, we are not able
to estimate this amount if exercised; however, the estimated cost is approximately $145.5 million. Our share would be approximately $80.0 million. The amount of cash required to fund
these option purchases may be substantially less than the option price due to the applicable BHMP CO-JV's notes receivable investment, assumption of existing Property Entity financing and
new financing sources. As of March 31, 2010, no purchase options are exercisable.

Each
of the BHMP CO-JV equity investments that include unaffiliated third-party partners also includes buy/sell provisions. Under these provisions and during specific
periods, a partner could make an offer to purchase the interest of the other partner and the other partner would have the option to accept the offer or purchase the offering partner's interest at that
price. As of March 31, 2010, no such offers are outstanding.

The
Bailey's Crossing BHMP CO-JV may become obligated to purchase a limited partnership interest in the Bailey's Crossing BHMP CO-JV at a price set through an
appraisal process. The

30

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

11. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

obligation
is for a one-year period commencing November 2011. As this amount is based on future events and valuations, we are not able to estimate this amount if exercised; however
the limited partner's invested capital as of March 31, 2010 is approximately $11.8 million. Our share would be approximately $6.5 million.

In
the ordinary course of business, the multifamily communities in which we have investments may have commitments to provide affordable housing. Under these arrangements, we generally
receive from the resident a below market rent, which is determined by a local or national authority. In certain arrangements, a local or national housing authority makes payments covering some or
substantially all of the difference between the restricted rent paid by residents and market rents. In connection with our acquisition of The Gallery at NoHo Commons, we assumed an obligation to
provide affordable housing through 2048. As partial reimbursement for this obligation, the housing authority will make level annual payments of approximately $2.0 million through 2028 and no
reimbursement for the remaining 20-year period. We may also be required to reimburse the housing authority if certain operating results are achieved on a cumulative basis during the term
of the agreement. At the acquisition, we recorded a liability of $14.0 million based on the fair value of the terms over the life of the agreement. In addition, we will record rental revenue
from the housing authority on a straight line basis, recognizing a portion of the collections as deferred lease revenues and other related liabilities. As of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, we have approximately $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of carrying value for deferred lease revenues and other related liabilities. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized approximately $0.3 million of deferred revenue amortization related to The Gallery at NoHo Commons affordable housing obligations. We did not
recognize any deferred revenue amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

12. Related Party Arrangements

Our advisor and certain of its affiliates have earned fees and compensation in connection with each of our public offerings and earn fees and compensation in connection with the
acquisition, debt financing, management and sale of our assets.

We
have no employees and are supported by related party service agreements. We are dependent on our Advisor, Behringer Securities LP ("Behringer Securities") and Behringer Harvard
Multifamily Management Services, LLC ("BHM Management"), each affiliates of our Advisor, for certain services that are essential to us, including the sale of shares of our common stock, asset
acquisition and disposition decisions, property management and leasing services and other general administrative responsibilities. In the event that these companies become unable to provide us with
the respective services, we would be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Our
advisory management agreement (the "Advisory Management Agreement"), as it has been amended and restated, may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year
terms. The current term of the Advisory Management Agreement expires on April 1, 2011. The board of directors has a duty to evaluate the performance of our Advisor annually before the parties
can agree to renew the agreement.

We
are required to reimburse the Advisor for organization and offering expenses related to a public offering of shares (other than pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan) and any
organization

31

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

12. Related Party Arrangements (Continued)

and
offering expenses previously advanced by the Advisor related to a prior offering of shares to the extent not previously reimbursed by us out of proceeds from the prior offering ("O&O
Reimbursement"). However, the Advisor is obligated to reimburse us after the completion of the public offering to the extent that O&O Reimbursement paid by the Company exceeds 1.5% of the gross
proceeds of the completed public offering. The Company's reimbursement of organization and offering
expenses related to subsequent public offerings of shares also will not be capped as of the date of reimbursement, unless the terms are amended by the parties upon renewal of the Advisory Management
Agreement. In April 2009, in connection with an amendment to the Advisory Management Agreement, a payment of $6.9 million was made to the Advisor for prior O&O Reimbursement incurred but
not previously paid. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we incurred O&O Reimbursement of approximately $2.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively. As of
March 31, 2010, the amount by which our O&O Reimbursement exceeded 1.5% of the gross proceeds of our Initial Public Offering was approximately $9.7 million of which $1.1 million
was accrued and unpaid.

Behringer
Securities serves as the dealer manager for the Initial Public Offering and receives selling commissions of up to 7% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance of
commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. In connection with the Initial Public Offering, up to 2.5% of gross proceeds before reallowance to participating broker-dealers are paid to
Behringer Securities as a dealer manager fee. No selling commissions or dealer manager fee is paid on purchases made pursuant to our DRIP. In the Initial Public Offering, Behringer Securities reallows
all of its commissions to participating broker-dealers and reallows a portion of its dealer manager fee of up to 2.0% of the gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating broker-dealers;
provided, however, that Behringer Securities may reallow, in the aggregate, no more than 1.5% of gross offering proceeds for marketing fees and expenses, bona fide training and educational meetings
and non-itemized, non-invoiced due diligence efforts, and no more than 0.5% of gross offering proceeds for bona fide, separately invoiced due diligence expenses incurred as
fees, costs and other expenses from third parties.

The
following presents the components of our sale of common stock, net related to our Initial Public Offering (amounts in millions):

For the Three
Months Ended
March 31,Sale of common stock

2010

2009Gross proceeds

$
139.5

$
53.3Less offering costs:O&O Reimbursement


(2.3
)

(2.0
)Dealer manager fees


(3.5
)

(1.3
)Selling commissions


(9.4
)

(3.7
)Total offering costs


(15.2
)

(7.0
)Sale of common stock, net

$
124.3

$
46.3


32

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

12. Related Party Arrangements (Continued)

Included
in general and administrative expenses are accounting and legal personnel costs incurred on our behalf by our Advisor for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
is approximately $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Our
Advisor and its affiliates receive acquisition and advisory fees of 1.75% of (1) the contract purchase price paid or allocated in respect of the development, construction or
improvement of each asset acquired directly by us, including any debt attributable to these assets, or (2) when we make an investment indirectly through another entity, our pro rata share of
the gross asset value of real estate investments held by that entity. Our Advisor and its affiliates also receive 1.75% of the funds advanced in respect of a loan or other investment.

Our
Advisor receives a non-accountable acquisition expense reimbursement in the amount of 0.25% of (a) funds advanced in respect of a loan or other investment, and
(b) the funds paid for purchasing an asset, including any debt attributable to the asset, plus 0.25% of the funds budgeted for development, construction or improvement in the case of assets
that we acquire and intend to develop, construct or improve. We will also pay third parties, or reimburse the Advisor, for any investment-related expenses due to third parties in the case of a
completed investment, including, but not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, costs of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, third-party brokerage or finder's
fees, title insurance, premium expenses and other closing costs. Our Advisor will be responsible, and we have no obligation, for paying all of the expenses it incurs associated with persons employed
by the Advisor to the extent dedicated to making investments for us, such as wages and benefits of the investment personnel. Our Advisor will also be responsible, and we have no obligation, for paying
all of the investment-related expenses that we or our Advisor incurs that are due to third parties with respect to investments we do not make.

For
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our Advisor earned acquisition and advisory fees, including the acquisition expense reimbursement, of approximately
$2.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, approximately $0.6 million and $0.1 million of these amounts,
respectively, were capitalized to investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.

Our
Advisor receives debt financing fees of 1% of the amount available to us under debt financing which was originated, assumed or refinanced by or for us. Our Advisor may pay some or
all of these fees to third parties with whom it subcontracts to coordinate financing for us. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, our Advisor has earned debt financing fees of
approximately $1.9 million. Our Advisor did not earn any debt financing fees for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

On
September 2, 2008, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement (the "Property Management Agreement") with our operating partnership and our
property manager, BHM Management. The Property Management Agreement has a term of two years from the effective date of the original property management agreement and will terminate on
November 21, 2010. If no party gives written notice of termination to the other parties at least thirty days prior to the expiration date of the agreement, then it will automatically continue
for consecutive two-year periods. The Property Management Agreement also provides that, in the event we terminate the advisory management agreement with our Advisor, BHM Management will
have the right to terminate the agreement upon at least thirty days prior written notice.

33

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

12. Related Party Arrangements (Continued)

Property
management fees are equal to 3.75% of gross revenues. In the event that we contract directly with a non-affiliated third-party property manager in respect to a
property, we will pay BHM Management or its affiliates an oversight fee equal to 0.5% of gross revenues of the property managed. In no event will we pay both a property management fee and an oversight
fee to BHM Management or its affiliates with respect to a particular property. We will reimburse the costs and expenses incurred by BHM Management on our behalf, including fees and expenses of
apartment locators and third-party accountants, the wages and salaries and other employee-related expenses of all on-site employees of BHM Management and other
out-of-pocket expenses that are directly related to the management of specific properties.

The
Property Management Agreement applies where we have control over the selection of property management. As of March 31, 2010, 14 multifamily communities were managed under the
Property Management Agreement. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, BHM Management or its affiliates earned minimal property management fees. For all other multifamily
communities, the third-party developer has selected the property manager or the property is still in development.

Our
Advisor receives a monthly asset management fee for each asset held by us. This amount is 0.75% of the higher of the cost of investment or value of the investment. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our Advisor earned asset management fees of approximately $1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

We
will pay a development fee to our Advisor in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered to similar projects in the geographic market of the project;
provided, however, we will not pay a development fee to an affiliate of our Advisor if our Advisor or any of its affiliates elects to receive an acquisition and advisory fee based on the cost of such
development. Our Advisor has earned no development fees since our inception.

For
other expenses paid or incurred by our Advisor in connection with the services provided to us that are not covered by a fee, we will reimburse our Advisor, subject to the limitation
that we will not reimburse our Advisor for any amount by which its operating expenses (including the asset management fee) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of:
(A) 2% of our average invested assets ("AIA"), or (B) 25% of our net income ("NI") determined without reduction for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar
non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for that period. Notwithstanding the above, we may reimburse our Advisor for expenses in excess of this limitation if a
majority of our independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. We do not reimburse our Advisor or its affiliates for
personnel
employment costs incurred by our Advisor or its affiliates in performing services under the Advisory Management Agreement to the extent that such employees perform services for which the Advisor
receives a separate fee.

For
the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2010, total operating expenses of approximately $9.8 million exceeded 2% of our AIA (which was approximately
$5.6 million) by approximately $4.2 million. Our board of directors, including all of our independent directors, has reviewed this analysis and unanimously determined the excess to be
justified considering that we are currently in our acquisition and development stage, that certain investments are not stabilized and that we are

34

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

12. Related Party Arrangements (Continued)

continuing
to raise capital for our Initial Public Offering of common stock where the expenses incurred as a result of being a public company for audit and legal services, director and officer
liability insurance and fees for board of directors are disproportionate to the Company's AIA and NI.

13. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

Supplemental cash flow information is summarized below (amounts in millions):

For the Three
Months Ended
March 31,2010

2009Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized of $0.5 million in 2010

$
0.3

$
Non-cash investing and financing activities:Assumption of mortgage note payable

$
26.7

$
Stock issued pursuant to our DRIP

$
3.6

$
1.1Distributions payable

$
4.1

$
0.6Accrued offering costs and dealer manager fees

$
1.2

$
2.2Redemptions payable

$
0.8

$
0.4Contingent consideration liability

$
0.4

$
Receivable from affiliates

$


$
0.3Receivable from BHMP CO-JV

$


$
0.2


14. Subsequent Events



For the period April 1, 2010 through May 7, 2010, we sold approximately 7.1 million shares of common stock for
gross proceeds of approximately $70.8 million including issuances through our DRIP.



On April 2, 2010, we paid total distributions of approximately $4.1 million, of which $2.0 million was cash
distributions and $2.1 million was funded by issuing shares pursuant to our DRIP, relating to distributions declared each day in the month of March 2010. On May 4, 2010, we paid
total distributions of approximately $4.3 million, of which $2.0 million was cash distributions and $2.3 million was funded by issuing shares pursuant to our DRIP, relating to
distributions declared each day in the month of April 2010.



Subsequent to the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale agreements for multifamily communities for a
total purchase price of approximately $79.2 million, excluding closing costs. As of May 13, 2010, we have made a total of $1.5 million in earnest money deposits on these
multifamily communities. If consummated, we expect that the acquisitions would be made through

35

---



Table of Contents

Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

14. Subsequent Events (Continued)

wholly
owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership or newly created BHMP CO-JVs. The consummation of each purchase remains subject to substantial conditions, including, but not limited
to, (1) the satisfaction of the conditions to the acquisition contained in the relevant contracts; (2) no material adverse change occurring relating to the multifamily community or in
the local economic conditions; (3) our receipt of sufficient net proceeds from the Initial Public Offering and financing proceeds to make the acquisition; and (4) our receipt of
satisfactory due diligence information, including environmental reports and lease information. Other investments may be identified in the future that we may acquire before or instead of these
multifamily communities.

36

---





Table of Contents

Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). These
forward-looking statements include discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc. and its subsidiaries
(which may be referred to herein as the "Company," "we," "us" or "our"), including, but not limited to, our ability to make accretive investments, our ability to generate cash flow to support cash
distributions to our stockholders, our ability to obtain favorable debt financing, our ability to secure leases at favorable rental rates, our assessment of market rental rate trends and other
matters. Words such as "may," "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "would," "could," "should" and variations of these words and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These
forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding
of the business and industry, the economy and other future conditions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution stockholders not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties
and other factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described under Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 31, 2010 and the factors described below:



Forward-looking
statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect our management's view only as of the date of this Report, and may ultimately prove
to be incorrect or false. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to
future operating results. We intend for these

37

---



Table of Contents

forward-looking
statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions created by Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

Cautionary Note

The representations, warranties, and covenants made by us in any agreement filed as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report are made solely
for the benefit of the parties to the agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to the agreement, and should not be deemed to be representations,
warranties, or covenants to or with any other parties. Moreover, these representations, warranties or covenants should not be relied upon as accurately describing or reflecting the current state of
our affairs.

Overview

We were incorporated on August 4, 2006 as a Maryland corporation and operate as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We make
investments in and operate high quality multifamily communities. In particular, we were organized to invest in and operate high quality multifamily communities that we believe have desirable
locations, personalized amenities, and high quality construction. We began acquiring interests in multifamily communities in April 2007. As of March 31, 2010, all of our investments have
been in high quality development and operating multifamily communities located in the top 50 MSAs in the United States. We have made and intend to continue making investments both in wholly owned
investments and through co-investment arrangements with other participants ("Co-Investment Ventures").

Our
investment strategy is designed to provide our stockholders with a diversified portfolio, and our management and board of directors have extensive experience in investing in numerous
types of real estate, loans and other investments to execute this strategy. We intend to focus on acquiring high quality multifamily communities that will produce rental income and will appreciate in
value within our program's targeted life. Our targeted communities include existing "core" properties that are already stabilized and producing rental income as well as more opportunistic properties
in various phases of development, redevelopment, lease up or repositioning. Further, we may invest in other types of commercial real estate, real estate-related securities, mortgage, bridge, mezzanine
or other loans and Section 1031 tenant-in-common interests, or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing. Although we intend to primarily invest in real
estate assets located in the United States, in the future, we may make investments in real estate assets located outside the United States.

On
September 5, 2008, we commenced our initial public offering (the "Initial Public Offering") of up to 200 million shares of common stock offered at a price of $10.00 per
share pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed under the Securities Act. The Initial Public Offering also covered the registration of up to an additional
50 million shares of common stock at a price of $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan ("DRIP"). We reserve the right to reallocate shares of our common stock between
the primary offering and our DRIP.

As
of March 31, 2010, we own five wholly owned multifamily communities, 18 investments in Co-Investment Ventures and one wholly owned note receivable. As discussed
below, we plan to utilize available Co-Investment Ventures as a funding source when it is an effective structure for the investment. We intend to fund these investments with a combination
of sources, including proceeds from our Initial Public Offering, mortgage debt and unsecured or secured debt facilities.

As
of March 31, 2010 all of our Co-Investment Ventures have been made through joint ventures with Behringer Harvard Master Partnership I LP (the "BHMP
Co-Investment Partner") through entities in which we are the manager. The 1% general partner of the BHMP Co-Investment Partner is Behringer Harvard
Institutional GP LP, which is an affiliate of our Advisor and is indirectly owned by our sponsor, Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC. The 99% limited partner of the BHMP
Co-Investment

38

---



Table of Contents

Partner
is Stichting Depositary PGGM Private Real Estate Fund, a Dutch foundation acting in its capacity as depositary of and for the account and risk of PGGM Private Real Estate Fund, an investment
vehicle for Dutch pension funds ("PGGM"). Substantially all of the capital provided to the BHMP Co-Investment Partner is from PGGM. We have no ownership or other direct financial interests
in either of these entities.

Each
of our separate joint ventures with the BHMP Co-Investment Partner is made through a separate entity that owns 100% of the voting equity interests and approximately 99%
of the economic interests in one subsidiary REIT, through which substantially all of the joint venture's business is conducted. Each separate joint venture entity, together with its respective
subsidiary REIT, is referred to herein as a "BHMP CO-JV." Each BHMP CO-JV is a separate legal entity formed for the sole purpose of holding its respective investment and
obtaining legally separated debt and equity financing.

Each
BHMP CO-JV is managed by us or a subsidiary of ours, but the operation of the BHMP CO-JV's investment must generally be conducted in accordance with
operating plans approved by the BHMP Co-Investment Partner. In addition, without the consent of all members of the BHMP CO-JV, the manager may not generally approve or
disapprove on behalf of the BHMP CO-JV certain major decisions affecting the BHMP CO-JV, such as (i) selling or otherwise disposing of the BHMP CO-JV's
investment or any other property having a value in excess of $100,000, (ii) selling any additional interests in the BHMP CO-JV, (iii) approving initial and annual operating
plans and capital expenditures or (iv) incurring or materially modifying any indebtedness of the BHMP CO-JV in excess of $100,000 or causing the BHMP CO-JV to become
liable for any debt, obligation or undertaking of any other individual or entity in excess of $100,000 other than in accordance with the operating plans. The BHMP Co-Investment Partner may
remove the manager for cause and appoint a successor. Distributions of net cash flow from the BHMP CO-JV will be distributed to the members no less than quarterly in accordance
with the members' ownership interests. BHMP CO-JV capital contributions and distributions are made pro rata in accordance with ownership interests.

We
have determined that our BHMP CO-JVs are not variable interest entities and that each partner has equal substantive control and participating rights with no single party
controlling each BHMP CO-JV. Accordingly, we account for our interest in each BHMP CO-JV using the equity method of accounting.

Certain
BHMP CO-JVs have made equity investments with third-party partners in, and/or have made loans to, entities that own one multifamily operating or development
community. The collective group of these operating property entities or development entities are collectively referred to herein as "Property Entities." Each Property Entity is a separate legal entity
for the sole purpose of holding its respective operating property or development project and obtaining legally separated debt and equity financing.

Two
of our 18 BHMP CO-JVs have made only mezzanine or mortgage loan investments in Property Entities that are developing multifamily communities. Nine investments are
indirectly wholly owned by the BHMP CO-JVs. The remaining seven BHMP CO-JVs have made equity investments with third-party partners in, and/or have made notes receivable to,
Property Entities that own one real estate operating property or development project. The partners of these Property Entities are the applicable BHMP CO-JV and unaffiliated third parties,
which serve as general or limited partners and are generally subsidiaries of commercial developers which were organized to own, construct, and finance only one particular real estate project. Each of
these seven BHMP CO-JV investments in a Property Entity is evaluated for consolidation at the BHMP CO-JV level using our principles of consolidation and three investments are
reported on a consolidated basis by the BHMP CO-JV. The remaining four investments are recorded as unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and reported with the equity method of
accounting by the respective BHMP CO-JVs.

39

---



Table of Contents

We
believe our strategy of investing through Co-Investment Ventures will allow us to increase the number of our investments, thereby increasing our diversification, and
providing participation with greater economic interest in larger or more selective real estate investments with greater access to high quality investment opportunities. We also believe partnerships
with high quality institutional entities, such as PGGM, enhances the valuation of our portfolio. We intend to continue to invest through BHMP CO-JVs in operating communities,
to-be-developed multifamily communities or newly constructed multifamily communities that have not yet stabilized, excluding residential properties for assisted living, student
housing or senior housing. However, we are not limited to co-investments with
the BHMP Co-Investment Partner and may pursue other Co-Investment Ventures if they provide greater diversification or investment opportunities. We may also pursue direct
investments consistent with our investment policies.

PGGM's
commitment under the partnership agreement of the BHMP Co-Investment Partner is $300 million. Until the funding commitment from PGGM of $300 million has
been placed in BHMP CO-JVs or in other co-investments with affiliates or investment programs of our sponsor, to the extent that investments fit within the investment parameters
agreed between PGGM and our sponsor, we expect a portion of our future real estate acquisitions and real estate under development activities will be made through BHMP CO-JVs. Generally,
the BHMP Co-Investment Partner will co-invest in a BHMP CO-JV with a 45% equity interest and we will co-invest with a 55% equity interest, although the
BHMP Co-Investment Partner may elect smaller allocations. Our strategy is to utilize these combined funds to invest in Property Entities which may include other third parties, generally
developers investing in multifamily communities. For equity investments, the partners to these Property Entities will then include a BHMP CO-JV and the developer partner, although there
could be other third-party participants.

Each
Property Entity arrangement with an unaffiliated developer is unique and heavily negotiated, but we will generally seek the following provisions:

For
development stage investments:



For
operating and development stage investments:



40

---



Table of Contents



We
believe these specific terms and the general provisions noted above will help us achieve our return objectives and help mitigate certain of the real estate project risks. However, not
all of these provisions will necessarily be included in each Property Entity arrangement and there is no assurance we will achieve those objectives.

Our
multifamily community acquisition strategy concentrates on multifamily communities located in the top 50 MSAs across the United States. We believe these types of investments are in
demand by institutional investors which can result in better exit pricing. We also believe that economic conditions in the major metropolitan markets of the United States will continue to provide
adequate demand for properly positioned multifamily communities; such conditions include job and salary growth, lifestyle trends, as well as single-family home pricing and availability of credit. The
U.S. Census population estimates are used to determine the largest MSAs. Our top 50 MSA strategy will focus on acquiring properties and other real estate assets that provide us with broad geographic
diversity.

Investments
in multifamily communities have benefited from the changing demographic and residential finance trends of the last ten years. These trends include continued growth in
non-traditional households, the echo-boomer generation coming of age and entering the rental market, baby-boomers or retirees who desire freedom from the costs and
expenses of entering and maintaining a home, increased immigration and recently higher credit standards for home buyers. Changes in domestic financial markets can affect the stability and direction of
these historical trends and can significantly affect our strategy, both favorably and unfavorably. Demand for multifamily communities is also affected by changes in financial markets where changes in
underwriting have affected the cost, availability and affordability of financing for purchase of single family homes. In the near term, we believe these trends will be favorable for multifamily demand
as the key demographic population increases and single family housing options become more restrictive.

Market Outlook

After over two years of volatility and uncertainty in the general economy, we are seeing clear signs of a market recovery. After
posting four consecutive quarters of GDP contractions through second quarter 2009, the U.S. economy has reported GDP increases through the first quarter of 2010. Initial jobless claims, nonfarm
payroll and employment have been trending positively for the first quarter of 2010 and there are reported improvements in consumer and business spending, manufacturing output and retail sales. In the
multifamily real estate sector, national research firms have reported increases in effective rents across many markets, significant improvements of ratios of property offerings of sales to closings
and decreases in cap rates for high quality communities. However, multifamily vacancy rates are high by historical measures, and while they have stabilized, so-called shadow rental
alternatives from unsold condominiums and single-family residences will slow any improvement. The U.S. economy lost a significant number of jobs in the last two years and is still burdened by
historically high unemployment, which even with continued improvements will require time to reach equilibrium. Accordingly, we still believe the recovery to be gradual and uneven for most of 2010 with
greater and sustainable improvements thereafter.

41

---



Table of Contents

In
most real estate capital markets, liquidity continues to tighten and we expect leverage availability to be lower with greater emphasis on recourse to the borrower and principal
amortization. However for multifamily investments, we believe financing options are more favorable, particularly for high quality, well-capitalized investments. In particular,
government-sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ("GSEs") have and may continue to provide needed financing, refinancing and credit enhancement to the multifamily sector. In the last
12 months, we and three of our BHMP CO-JVs completed six new loan originations with GSEs totaling approximately $295.7 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.5%.
This includes a $150 million LIBOR-based credit facility at a current rate of 2.33%. Although there can be no assurance that the GSEs or comparable financing will continue to be available or
available at these rates, these are positive factors in our investment strategy. Further, market interest rates continue to be at historical lows. Short term rates, as measured by 30-day
LIBOR, have been relatively unchanged during the first quarter of 2010 and as of March 31, 2010 are approximately 0.25%. During the same period, longer term rates have exhibited slightly more
volatility but are still remaining within a relatively tight band. Five-year and ten-year treasuries fluctuated between approximately 2.20% to 2.65% and 3.60% to 3.90%, respectively. As of
March 31, 2010, the five-year and ten-year treasuries stood at 2.55% and 3.84%, respectively. At these base rates, overall financing rates for multifamily communities are very attractive and
provide leveraged returns in excess of our distribution rate. We do see the potential for rates to increase and accordingly a component of our finance strategy is to obtain fixed-rate
financing for stabilized multifamily communities with maturities ranging from five to ten years. We will also continue to monitor the interplay of capitalization rates and financing interest rates to
evaluate whether our overall multifamily community investment total returns are accretive to the Company.

With
our access to capital, including the proceeds from our Initial Public Offering, available multifamily financing and the potential for additional joint venture investments with the
BHMP Co-Investment Partner or other parties, we believe we have the capital resources, relationships and experience to continue to execute our strategy of investing in high quality
multifamily communities in fundamentally sound, diversified long-term markets. A strong positive from the current macro economic conditions is that there will be limited new supply of
multifamily assets in the near future. Since high quality multifamily developments can take 18 to 36 months to entitle, obtain necessary permits and construct, we believe there will be an
imbalance in supply and demand fundamentals. As the economy improves, particularly in job growth and specifically in the demographic sectors which have a relatively higher proportion of multifamily
residents, we expect renter demand and effective rent to increase in multifamily investments. Particularly after 2010, we expect multifamily rental rates to begin to return to their
pre-recession levels. This could result in higher rental increases during that period. However, in the interim, the expected slow recovery in employment and a consequential lag in vacancy
improvements could result in uneven growth in net operating income, which may affect certain investment values and cash flow.

We
expect to use the proceeds from our Initial Public Offering as the primary funding source for the execution of our investment strategy and the expansion of our portfolio. As of
March 31, 2010, we sold a total of approximately 57.7 million shares of common stock and raised a total of $575.1 million in gross proceeds from our Initial Public Offering. We
intend to leverage the proceeds from these offerings with property debt and aim for a leverage ratio of approximately 50% to 60% following the investment of the proceeds raised from the Initial Public
Offering and upon stabilization of our portfolio. We may use various forms of debt financing, including property specific, cross collateralized pools and credit facilities. We will generally seek
non-recourse financing, particularly for stabilized communities.

We
expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through the net cash raised from offerings, our credit facility and cash flow from operating activities of our current
and future investments. For purposes of our long-term liquidity requirements, we expect that the net cash from

42

---



Table of Contents

our
Initial Public Offering, our credit facility and from our current and future investments will generate sufficient cash flow to cover operating expenses and our distributions to stockholders. Also
to the extent we hold unencumbered or appreciated real estate investments, refinancing proceeds could be another source of capital.

Property Portfolio

Our multifamily investments include wholly owned multifamily communities, investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and
a wholly owned note receivable. Each of these investments is categorized based on stages as defined below:



Presented
below are the carrying amounts for our wholly owned real estate investments, individual BHMP CO-JV investments and our note receivables as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009. For the investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in BHMP CO-JVs, we provide information describing the underlying investment. Also presented
are the occupancy rates as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, for stabilized multifamily communities, based on the number of individual units and GLA (amounts in millions):

Occupancy Rates

Total Real Estate, net
(in millions)Units

March 31,
2010

December 31,
2009

March 31,
2010

December 31,
2009Wholly Owned InvestmentsStabilized / Non-comparable:The Gallery at NoHo Commons / Los Angeles, California(1)


438


91
%

90
%
$
105.4

$
106.0Mariposa Loft Apartments / Atlanta, Georgia


253


94
%

91
%

27.7


27.9Grand Reserve Orange / Orange, Connecticut


168


91
%

92
%

24.9


25.1Acacia on Santa Rosa Creek / Santa Rosa, California


277


96
%

N/A


37.3


The Lofts at Park Crest / McLean, Virginia(2)


131


91
%

N/A


49.5


Total wholly owned investments


1,267







$
244.8

$
159.0




43

---



Table of Contents

Occupancy Rates

Total Real Estate, net
(in millions)Units

March 31,
2010

December 31,
2009

March 31,
2010

December 31,
2009Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures(3)Stabilized / Comparable:The Reserve at Johns Creek Walk / Johns Creek, Georgia(4)


210


97
%

93
%
$
3.8

$
4.0Stabilized / Non-comparable:Halstead / Houston, Texas(5)


301


87
%

90
%

3.3


3.4Waterford Place / Dublin, California(5)


390


93
%

92
%

10.5


11.0Burrough's Mill Apartment Homes / Cherry Hill, New Jersey(5)


308


93
%

92
%

7.5


8.1Calypso Apartments and Lofts / Irvine, California(5)


177


94
%

89
%

14.3


27.44550 Cherry Creek / Denver, Colorado(5)


288


91
%

N/A


13.0


Lease ups:The Eclipse / Houston, Texas(5)


330


N/A


N/A


19.0


19.7Forty55 Lofts / Marina del Rey, California(5)


140


N/A


N/A


27.0


26.2Cyan/PDX / Portland, Oregon(2)(5)


352


N/A


N/A


45.8


46.2San Sebastian / Laguna Woods, California(5)


134


N/A


N/A


19.7


19.955 Hundred / Arlington, Virginia(2)(4)(6)


234


N/A


N/A


23.2


23.6Bailey's Crossing / Alexandria, Virginia(4)(6)


414


N/A


N/A


29.7


29.8The Venue / Clark County, Nevada(4)(6)(7)


168


N/A


N/A


4.3


4.5Satori / Fort Lauderdale, Florida(2)(4)(6)(7)


279


N/A


N/A


11.9


12.3Skye 2905 / Denver, Colorado(2)(4)(6)(7)


400


N/A


N/A


12.7


12.9Veritas / Henderson, Nevada(4)(6)(7)


430


N/A


N/A


14.7


14.9Grand Reserve / Dallas, Texas(6)(8)


149


N/A


N/A


5.2


5.1The Cameron / Silver Spring, Maryland(2)(6)(8)


325


N/A


N/A


10.9


10.9Total investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures


5,029







$
276.5

$
279.96,296Note and Other ReceivablesGrand Reserve / Dallas, Texas










$
2.5

$
2.4Tax Increment Receivable











1.6


1.6Due from Community Redevelopment Agency, Los Angeles, California in connection with The Gallery at NoHo Commons$
4.1

$
4.0


(1)Purchase
price for The Gallery at NoHo Commons was $96.0 million, before closing costs and prorations.(2)Includes
retail space, where the total approximate square footage of retail space of gross leasable area ("GLA") for all these investments totals
approximately 100,000 square feet, approximately 6% of total rentable area. Of the stabilized communities, only The Lofts at Park Crest contain any retail space with approximately 67,000 square feet,
all of which was leased as of March 31, 2010.


44

---



Table of Contents

(3)Our
ownership interest in all our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures is 55% except for The Reserve at Johns Creek Walk (64%) and
Cyan/PDX (70%).(4)Equity
investment of a BHMP CO-JV in a Property Entity with unaffiliated third parties.(5)Equity
investment wholly owned by a BHMP CO-JV.(6)Equity
interests in the property owned by BHMP CO-JV and/or other owners may be subject to call rights, put rights and/or buy-sell
rights and/or right of BHMP CO-JV to convert mezzanine loan investment to equity in the property.(7)Equity
investment of a BHMP CO-JV in a Property Entity with unaffiliated third parties and a loan investment by a BHMP CO-JV.(8)Loan
investment by a BHMP CO-JV.


The
increased carrying amounts on our wholly owned investments as of March 31, 2010 are largely due to acquiring two wholly owned multifamily communities during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $106.8 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we also invested in one newly formed BHMP
CO-JV, which holds a wholly owned multifamily community, 4550 Cherry Creek. Our share of the capital contribution was approximately $28.6 million. Also during the three months ended
March 31, 2010, the 4550 Cherry Creek and Calypso Apartments and Lofts BHMP CO-JVs separately obtained mortgage financing of $52.6 million and distributed substantially all
of the net proceeds to us and the BHMP Co-Investment Partner. Our share of the distributions was $28.3 million and is recorded as a reduction in the respective investment in
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.

Results of Operations

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we are reporting a net loss of $9.0 million, compared to net income of
$0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The overall decrease in net income is primarily due to our acquisitions made in the past 12 months of five wholly owned
multifamily communities, eight acquisitions by BHMP CO-JVs and the treatment of these acquisition activities. Our share of acquisition costs related to our acquisitions is expensed. For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, our share of acquisition expenses was approximately $3.0 million, including our share of acquisition expenses for unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures. We did not make any new acquisitions for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and did not recognize any acquisition expenses for such period. Acquisition accounting also requires
that we allocate a portion of the purchase price to in-place lease intangibles. These lease intangibles are amortized over remaining lease terms, generally a term of less than one year.
Accordingly, amortization expense is higher in the period immediately following an acquisition for both our wholly owned investments and our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.
Further, several of the multifamily communities we have made investments in are in lease up or in development. During these periods, holding costs, amortization and depreciation expense may exceed the
pre-stabilization revenues. We expect that as we complete the investments of the proceeds from our Initial Public Offering that earnings on our stabilized real estate investments will have
a higher contribution to our net income while pre-stabilized investments will be proportionally less significant to our overall operating results. However, acquisition and amortization
expenses during this acquisition and development stage could be significant, resulting in net losses until we have substantially invested the proceeds from our Initial Public Offering.

Because
we did not own any wholly owned multifamily communities as of March 31, 2009, coupled with the activity noted above, many of our results for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 are not directly comparable to the three months ended March 31, 2009, where our results of operations for each period presented reflect significant increases in
substantially all reporting categories for the

45

---



Table of Contents

current
period. This will likely be the case until we substantially invest the proceeds from the Initial Public Offering.

The three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009

Rental Revenues.Rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were approximately $5.1 million. These rental
revenues are
from our five wholly owned multifamily communities acquired in the past twelve months, two of which were acquired in the first quarter of 2010. We expect continued increases in these revenues as a
result of owning these two communities for a full reporting period and our expected acquisitions of additional real estate investments. We did not have any wholly owned real estate assets as of
March 31, 2009 and consequently did not have any rental revenue during such period.

Property Operating and Real Estate Tax Expenses.Property operations and real estate tax expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2010
were approximately $2.0 million and are from our wholly owned multifamily communities acquired in the past twelve months, two of which were acquired in the first quarter of 2010. We expect
continued increases in these expenses as a result of owning these two communities for a full reporting period and our expected acquisitions of additional real estate investments. We did not have any
wholly owned real estate assets as of March 31, 2009 and consequently did not have such expenses.

Asset Management and Other Fees.Asset management fees for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately
$1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. These fees are based on the amount of our gross real estate investments and the time period in place. Accordingly, the increase is due to the
timing and funded amounts of our investments during the past twelve months. We expect continued increases in these fees as a result of owning and acquiring additional real estate investments.

General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were
approximately
$1.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and included corporate general and administrative expenses incurred and reimbursable by our Advisor, as well as compensation of our board of
directors, auditing and tax fees, and legal fees. The increase in the expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 is due to
higher administrative costs related to our Initial Public Offering. The increase included higher corporate legal and accounting reimbursements to our Advisor and director and officer insurance
expense. We expect further increases as a result of owning and acquiring additional real estate investments and other joint venture interests.

Acquisition Expenses.Acquisition expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were approximately $2.8 million and
relate to our
acquisition of Acacia on Santa Rosa Creek and The Lofts at Park Crest. The majority of the acquisition expenses were fees and expenses due to our Advisor. As we make additional wholly owned
investments, we expect acquisition expenses to increase and to have a significant effect on our operating results. We did not incur any acquisition expenses for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. Prior to 2009, Generally Accepted Accounting Principals ("GAAP") provided for the capitalization of acquisition costs. See the section below entitled "Funds from
Operations and Modified Funds from Operations" for additional discussion.

Interest Expense.Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $0.6 million, relating to
permanent
mortgages on our wholly owned multifamily communities in the amount of approximately $93.8 million as of March 31, 2010 and our credit facility with a balance of $10.0 million as
of March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, the weighted average of our permanent mortgages is approximately 4.78%. As of March 31, 2010, our borrowings under the credit facility
accrued interest at an annual rate of 2.33%. Also included in interest expense are credit facility fees related to minimum usage and unused commitments. These fees were not significant during the
three

46

---



Table of Contents

months
ended March 31, 2010, but could be in the future, particularly if the credit facility is not fully utilized. We did not have any debt on wholly owned multifamily communities for the
three months ended March 31, 2009.

Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately
$3.6 million, primarily relating to our wholly owned acquisitions made in the past twelve months. Depreciation and amortization expense primarily includes depreciation of our wholly owned
multifamily communities and amortization of acquired in-place leases. As we make additional wholly owned investments, we expect depreciation and amortization expense to increase and to be
a significant factor in our GAAP reported results. We did not have any wholly owned investments as of March 31, 2009. See the section below entitled "Funds from Operations and Modified Funds
from Operations" for additional discussion.

Interest Income.Interest income, which primarily included interest earned on our cash equivalents, for the three months ended
March 31, 2010
and 2009 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. We had higher average cash equivalent balances for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to
three months ended March 31, 2009. Our cash equivalent balance is primarily a function of the timing and magnitude of the proceeds raised from our Initial Public Offering and our expenditures
for investment activities. Accordingly, our cash equivalent balances are subject to significant changes. Due to our primary emphasis on providing liquidity for future real estate investments, our cash
equivalents are substantially held in daily liquidity bank deposits. In the current environment, these cash equivalents continue to have low earnings rates, where our average weighted interest rate
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately 0.9%, substantially unchanged for the comparable period in 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 interest income
also included earnings on a direct, wholly owned note receivable of approximately $0.1 million.
We earned minimal interest income from our wholly owned note receivable for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures.Equity in loss of joint venture investments for
the three
months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $3.2 million compared to equity in earnings of approximately $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. A
breakdown of our approximate equity in earnings by type of underlying investments is as follows (amounts in millions):

For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010

For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2009Equity in
Earnings (Loss)

Distributions
From Operating
Activities

Equity in
Earnings (Loss)

Distributions
From Operating
ActivitiesLoan investments

$
1.2

$
0.5

$
1.7

$
1.3Equity investments:Stabilized / Comparable


(0.2
)




(0.2
)

Stabilized / Non-comparable


(1.4
)

0.6





Lease ups


(2.8
)

0.4


(0.4
)

(4.4
)

1.0


(0.6
)

Total

$
(3.2
)
$
1.5

$
1.1

$
1.3


Earnings
from underlying loan investments decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to the BHMP
CO-JV conversion of mezzanine notes to additional equity interests for Bailey's Crossing, The Eclipse and 55 Hundred during the fourth quarter of 2009. As a result, these BHMP
CO-JVs did not have any interest income

47

---



Table of Contents

for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. These BHMP CO-JVs had interest income of approximately $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Equity
in loss from stabilized/non-comparable investments increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the comparable period in 2009, primarily due
to our share of depreciation and amortization expense and one-time charges for acquisition expenses exceeding net operating income. During the past twelve months, we added five new
stabilized/non-comparable communities. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we incurred approximately $0.2 million of one-time acquisition expenses related
to the acquisition of one operating BHMP CO-JV. While all our stabilized/non-comparable investments produced an overall loss, primarily due to non-cash expenses for
depreciation and amortization, these investments provided cash distributions from operating activity of approximately $0.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. These
acquisitions were substantially completed in the second half of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, and therefore do not include a full year of operating results. We expect to continue to receive
distributions from these investments but due to non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization, we expect a loss in reported equity earnings.

Equity
in loss from lease up equity investments increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the comparable period in 2009, primarily due to an increase in the
number of properties underlying our investments that were in lease up. All of the investments in properties undergoing lease up produced losses as operating, interest, depreciation and amortization
expenses exceeded unstabilized rental revenue. Subsequent to March 31, 2009, 55 Hundred, The Venue, Satori, Skye 2905 and Veritas moved from development status where substantially
all costs were capitalized. These investments produced equity losses during 2010 of approximately $0.8 million. These properties are in the early stages of lease up and we expect losses from
these investments to increase during 2010. In addition, we made equity investments in Forty55, Cyan/PDX, San Sebastian and Bailey's Crossing subsequent to
March 31, 2009. These investments produced losses of approximately $1.0 million. The Eclipse and Satori are nearing stabilized lease up. Although they each produced equity losses, The
Eclipse did make distributions due to non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses and had improved operating results due to additional equity investments made to payoff of its loan and
ground lease.

We
review our investments for impairments in accordance with our accounting policies. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we have not recorded any impairment
losses. However, this conclusion could change in future periods based on changes in certain factors, primarily:



48

---



Table of Contents



In
December 2009, Fairfield Residential LLC, a real estate operating company, ("Fairfield Residential") and certain of its affiliates filed for voluntary bankruptcy.
Certain other affiliates of Fairfield Residential that serve as the general partner for The Cameron and current limited partners of Bailey's Crossing and 55 Hundred were not part of the
bankruptcy filing (the "Fairfield Projects"). The Bailey's Crossing, 55 Hundred and The Cameron Property Entities were also not a part of the bankruptcy filing. The Bailey's Crossing and
55 Hundred Property Entity restructurings and recapitalizations were completed prior to Fairfield Residential's bankruptcy and were not affected by the bankruptcy filing.

Because
Fairfield Residential has guaranteed repayment of The Cameron senior construction loan, as well as completion of the project for the senior construction loan, Fairfield
Residential's bankruptcy gave rise to an event of default under The Cameron senior construction loan agreement. As a result, The Cameron senior construction lender sent a default notice to The Cameron
Property Entity. These events in turn gave rise to an event of default under the BHMP CO-JV note receivable. To preserve its rights, the BHMP CO-JV also served a default notice
to The Cameron Property Entity related to its $19.3 million mezzanine loan. Through March 2010, the senior construction lender has continued to fund construction draws and has not
exercised any of its default remedies. If the senior construction lender did exercise its default remedies, we expect to have an opportunity to (a) cure the default, (b) purchase the
senior construction loan or (c) otherwise negotiate a solution acceptable to the senior construction lender. However, there is no assurance that we would be able to restructure the senior
construction loan including associated guarantees on terms that are acceptable to The Cameron Property Entity owners and us. Such restructuring could include a pay down of the senior construction loan
by The Cameron Property Entity and/or the BHMP CO-JV, which could result in a capital contribution by us to The Cameron BHMP CO-JV. In addition, the senior construction
lender's exercise of default remedies or the results of any restructuring negotiations may change our analysis of the accounting for the investment, which could result in the BHMP CO-JV
accounting for the investment as a joint venture, or if the BHMP CO-JV is viewed as the primary beneficiary, to consolidate the investment. However, we believe we have sufficient
collateral, contractual remedies and other creditor rights for us to recover all of our investment in the development project.

As
of March 31, 2010, management's assessment related to The Cameron BHMP CO-JV is that the loan investment is still properly accounted for as a loan. The continuation
of this accounting treatment is dependent on the resolution of the issues described above, and there can be no assurance as new facts and circumstances arise that different accounting would not be
required. A change in accounting could affect our recognition of earnings in future periods. As of March 31, 2010, no impairment charges related to our investments with respect to any of the
Fairfield Projects have been recorded.

Cash Flow Analysis

Cash and cash equivalents increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010 by approximately $57.1 million as compared
to an increase in cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of approximately $43.7 million. The increase in cash and cash equivalents is primarily due to
increased net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering which commenced in September 2008

49

---



Table of Contents

offset
by increased acquisitions of wholly owned multifamily communities and investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in 2010 as compared to 2009.



As of March 31, 2010, we had made investments in 23 multifamily communities, 12 in various stages of lease up or development and
11 in operating multifamily communities. During the past 12 months, we made five wholly owned multifamily acquisitions, where cash flows are reported on a consolidated basis rather than as
equity investments. In addition, our proceeds from our Initial Public Offering have increased in 2010 as compared to 2009. As a result, our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010
reflect significant differences from the cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Cash
flows used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $0.5 million as compared cash flows provided by operating activities of
$0.6 million for the same period in 2009. During 2010, we recognized approximately $3.0 million of acquisition expenses, approximately $2.8 million related to wholly owned
acquisitions and approximately $0.2 million related to acquisitions included within our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. There were no acquisition expenses during the
comparable period in 2009 and prior to 2009, acquisition expenses were capitalized and not included in cash flows from operating activities. Distributions received from our investments in
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures were $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $1.3 million for the comparable period in 2009. The increase was
primarily due to additional investments and improved operations for certain of the BHMP CO-JVs, offset by decreases in the amounts of interest income earned by the applicable BHMP
CO-JVs, primarily as a result of the conversion of loan receivables at The Eclipse, 55 Hundred and Bailey's Crossing BHMP CO-JVs. Cash flow from operating activities for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 also benefited from increases in payables, primarily related to our wholly owned multifamily communities. We did not own any wholly owned multifamily
communities for the comparable period in 2009.

Cash
flows used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $84.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively. For the three months
ended March 31, 2010, we acquired two wholly owned multifamily communities and invested in one new BHMP CO-JV. In connection with one of our wholly owned acquisitions, we assumed
debt financing. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, our primary investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures related to fulfilling our loan and equity fundings of our ten
BHMP CO-JV investments as well as funding for our wholly owned note receivable. As our Initial Public Offering continues in 2010, we would expect our new acquisitions to increase. Also,
advances were made to BHMP CO-JVs, primarily to pre-fund construction draws related to The Cameron Property Entity. Providing a source of investing cash flow for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 were BHMP CO-JV distributions related to financings for the Calypso Apartments and Lofts and 4550 Cherry Creek BHMP CO-JVs which were returns
of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures of $28.3 million. During the comparable period in 2009, returns of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures primarily
related to reimbursements of excess capital contributions and non-operating cash flows.

Cash
flows provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $142.0 million and $46.0 million, respectively. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering were approximately $124.0 million, compared to $47.9 million for the comparable period in 2009. As our
Initial Public Offering continues during 2010, we would expect proceeds from the sale of common stock to increase as compared to 2009. Additionally, financing activities increased due to obtaining new
financing from our credit facility as well as for one of our wholly owned multifamily communities. The acquisition of these communities was initially funded entirely with cash and then financed,
resulting in net proceeds of approximately $22.9 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, distributions increased due to higher distribution rates

50

---



Table of Contents

and
increased common stock outstanding from our Initial Public Offering as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Our board of directors increased the distribution rate from an
effective annual rate of 6.5% to 7.0% in March 2009, resulting in increased distributions. As discussed above, we expect to fund increased distributions from earnings on the increased amount of
investments and, to the extent necessary, from the proceeds of our Initial Public Offering.

In
accordance with the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts published by the North American Securities Administrators Association, also known as the NASAA REIT
Guidelines, our charter requires that we monitor our expenses on a trailing twelve-month basis. Our charter defines the following terms and requires that our Total Operating Expenses ("TOE") are
deemed to be excessive if at the end of any quarter they exceed for the prior trailing twelve month period the greater of 2% of our Average Invested Assets ("AIA") or 25% of our Net Income ("NI"). For
the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2010, TOE of approximately $9.8 million exceeded 2% of our AIA (which was approximately $5.6 million) by approximately
$4.2 million. Our board of directors, including all of our independent directors, have reviewed this analysis and unanimously determined the excess to be justified considering that we are
currently in our acquisition and development stage, that certain investments are not stabilized and that we are continuing to raise capital for our Initial Public Offering of common stock where the
expenses incurred as a result of being a public company for audit and legal
services, director and officer liability insurance and fees for board of directors are disproportionate to the Company's AIA and NI.

Liquidity and Capital Resources



Our principal demands for funds will continue to be investments in multifamily communities, on our own or through joint ventures, and
for the payment of operating expenses and distributions. Generally, cash needs for items other than our investments are expected to be met from operations, and cash needs for our investments,
including acquisition expenses, are expected to be met from the net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and other offerings of our securities as well as debt secured by our real estate
investments. However, there may be a delay between the sale of our shares, making investments in real estate and loans and the receipt of income from such investments, which could result in a delay in
the benefits to our stockholders of returns generated from our operations. During this period, we may use proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and our financings to fund distributions to our
stockholders. During this period, we may also decide to temporarily invest any uninvested proceeds in investments at lower returns than our targeted investments in real estate and real estate-related
assets. These lower returns may affect our ability to make distributions or the amount actually disbursed. We also intend to use our $150 million credit facility both to meet
short-term and acquisition liquidity requirements.

Unlike
other real estate types, multifamily financing is available at favorable rates for well capitalized, stabilized communities. However, if we are unable to borrow monies on terms
and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of communities we can purchase, and the return on the communities we do purchase likely will be lower. In addition, we
may find it difficult, costly or impossible to refinance indebtedness that is maturing. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, we may not be able to finance the properties
and our income could be reduced.



Our primary indicators of short-term liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents, the proceeds from our Initial Public
Offering and our credit facility. As of March 31, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $134.7 million, compared to $77.5 million as of December 31, 2009. On a
daily

51

---



Table of Contents

basis,
cash is primarily affected by our net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering. As of March 31, 2010, we sold approximately 57.7 million shares (including DRIP) of our common
stock with gross proceeds of approximately $575.1 million. Although there can be no assurance, we expect our sales of shares of common stock in our Initial Public Offering to increase in 2010
as compared to 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we received gross proceeds from our Initial Public Offering, including our DRIP, of approximately $144.7 million as
compared to gross proceeds of $54.0 million during the comparable period in 2009. We also expect our operating cash flows to increase from a full year of operations from our 2009 acquisitions
and as additional investments are added to our portfolio.

Our
cash and cash equivalents are invested in bank demand deposits, bank money market accounts and a high grade money market fund. We manage our credit exposure by diversifying our
investments over several financial institutions.

Our
primary operating expenditures are payments related to wholly owned property operations, asset management fees and general and administrative expenses. We currently meet these
obligations from cash flow from operating activities. Because we evaluate our investments fully loaded for all costs, we primarily fund acquisition expenses from the proceeds of our Initial Public
Offering. As the amount of our real estate investments increases, we would expect these expenses to also increase. Depending on the timing and magnitude, we may evaluate other short-term
financing options.

On
March 26, 2010, we closed on a $150 million credit facility. We intend to use the facility to provide greater flexibility in our cash management. If circumstances
provide us with incentives to acquire investments in all-cash transactions, we may draw on the credit facility for the fundings. When we have excess cash, we have the option to pay down
the facility. As of March 31, 2010, we have drawn $10 million under the credit facility. Based on the value of the collateral currently pledged under the facility, we may draw
approximately $7 million more as of March 31, 2010; however, future borrowings under the credit facility are subject to periodic revaluations, either increasing or decreasing available
borrowings. Also, we intend to increase the borrowing capacity by adding future wholly owned acquisitions to the facility's collateral pool.



Our primary funding source for investments is the proceeds we receive from our Initial Public Offering. In the offering, we seek to
raise up to $2 billion in gross proceeds from our primary offering and $475 million in gross proceeds from our DRIP. Total offering expenses are expected to be approximately 11% of the
gross proceeds from our primary offering, netting approximately 89% that is generally available for new investment, before funding of distributions and other operations as discussed above.

We
may increase the number and diversity of our investments by entering into joint ventures with partners such as the BHMP Co-Investment Partner. Through March 31,
2010, we and the BHMP Co-Investment Partner have contributed approximately $280.8 million and $213.1 million, respectively, to the BHMP CO-JVs for acquisition of
investments, primarily equity investments and mezzanine loans in multifamily communities. As of March 31, 2010, the BHMP Co-Investment Partner has a remaining contractual commitment
of approximately $10.2 million to BHMP CO-JVs. For us to realize the commitment, we would generally be expected to contribute approximately $18.3 million to BHMP
CO-JVs. We anticipate raising this capital and capital for future investments in BHMP CO-JVs from the proceeds of our Initial Public Offering. There is no assurance that we
will be able to raise sufficient capital to meet these requirements, and consequently, all or portions of the BHMP Co-Investment Partner commitment may not be available to us. See the
following section below entitled "Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations" for further discussion of our contractual contingencies.

52

---



Table of Contents

For
each equity investment, we will also evaluate the use of new or existing property debt, including our $150 million credit facility. Accordingly, depending on how the
investment is structured, we may utilize financing at our parent company level (primarily related to our wholly owned investments), at the BHMP CO-JV level or at the Property Entity level,
where there are unaffiliated third-party partners. Based on current market conditions and our investment and borrowing policies, we would expect our share of property debt financing to be
approximately 50% to 60% following the investment of the proceeds raised from the Initial Public Offering and upon stabilization of our portfolio. If property debt is used on wholly owned properties,
we expect it to be secured by the property (either individually or pooled for the credit facility), including rents and leases. BHMP CO-JV and Property Entity level debt, which is also
secured by the property, including rents and leases, has been used as construction financing for six Property Entities and for six operating communities. Property Entity debt or BHMP CO-JV
level debt is not an obligation or contingency for us (other than standard indemnities related to administrative matters that are substantially within our control or considered outside of our normal
course of business) but does allow us to increase our access to capital. We will generally seek non-recourse financing,
particularly for stabilized communities. As of March 31, 2010, all of our debt is individually secured property debt.

As
of March 31, 2010, the total carrying amount of debt, including our approximate share is summarized as follows (amounts in millions):

Total Carrying
Amount

Weighted Average
Interest Rate

Maturity Dates

Our Approximate
ShareCompany Level:Permanent mortgagesfixed interest rates

$
93.8

4.78%

2013 to 2017

$
93.8Credit facility


10.0

Monthly LIBOR
+ 2.08%

2017


10.0BHMP CO-JV Level:Permanent mortgagesfixed interest rates


162.4

4.99%

2011 to 2016


89.3Property Entity Level:Construction loansvariable interest rates


282.4

Monthly LIBOR
+ 2.28%

2010 to 2013


94.9Permanent mortgagesfixed interest rates


23.0

6.46%

2013


11.8Total

$
571.6





$
299.8




53

---





Table of Contents

Contractual principal payments for each of the five years from March 31, 2010 are as follows (in millions):

Parent
Company Level

BHMP CO-JV
Level

Property Entity
LevelApril - December 2010

$
0.4

$
0.9

$
69.42011

$
0.6

$
25.3

$
116.72012

$
0.6

$
1.7

$
44.52013

$
25.1

$
56.7

$
74.82014

$


$
0.4

$
2015 and thereafter

$
77.1

$
77.4

$



We
would expect to refinance these borrowings at or prior to their respective maturity dates. There is no assurance that at those times market terms would allow financings at comparable
interest rates or leverage levels. As a part of the BHMP CO-JV governing agreements, the BHMP
CO-JV's will not have individual or aggregate permanent financing leverage greater than 65% of the BHMP CO-JV property fair values unless the BHMP Co-Investment
Partner approves a greater leverage rate. In addition, we would anticipate that for some of these communities, lower leverage levels may be necessary which may require additional contributions from us
or the BHMP CO-JVs. We expect to use proceeds from our Initial Public Offering to fund any such capital contributions.

Other
potential future sources of capital may include proceeds from secured or unsecured financings, arrangements with other joint venture partners, proceeds from the sale of our
investments, if and when they are sold, and undistributed cash flow from operating activities. For our unsecured wholly owned properties, we may obtain financing through individual mortgages or credit
facilities collateralized by individual or pooled wholly owned communities. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we closed on $15.8 million of financing collateralized by our real
estate investment in Mariposa Loft Apartments. The mortgage loan payable has a term of seven years with interest-only payments at an annual rate of 5.21%. Additionally, we may use our
credit facility to provide bridge or long-term financing for acquisitions. Where the credit facility is used as bridge financing, we would use proceeds on a temporary basis until we could
secure permanent financing. The proceeds of such permanent financing would then be available to repay the credit facility. However, the credit facility may be used on a longer term basis, similar to
permanent financing.

As
of March 31, 2010, we currently have one wholly owned community with a purchase price of approximately $68.2 million that is not encumbered by any secured debt. We
currently intend to include this asset in the collateral pool for the credit facility, increasing our borrowing capacity to a total of approximately $55 million. In addition, four BHMP
CO-JVs have wholly owned communities with total carrying values of approximately $180.1 million that are not encumbered by any secured debt. We currently intend to obtain secured
financing for each of these communities.

For
each equity investment made by us or by the applicable BHMP CO-JV or Property Entity, we will also evaluate requirements for capital expenditures. Of the 23 multifamily
communities in which we have invested as of March 31, 2010, eight are in development projects that we invested through BHMP CO-JVs. With respect to these investments, we expect the
construction financing for the Property Entities to significantly meet all remaining funding requirements. We also have invested through BHMP CO-JVs in three multifamily communities in
lease up that do not currently have financing in place. We expect to place financing on these multifamily communities after stabilization. Until then, we and our BHMP Co-Investment Partner
will be required to fund certain construction costs. Our share of contractual costs is currently estimated to be $0.6 million and could increase in the range of $1 to 3 million. Also
related to our recent investments in the 4500 Cherry Creek BHMP CO-JV, we expect to make deferred maintenance expenditures of $1 to 2 million. We substantially funded our share of
these expenditures at the inception of the BHMP CO-JVs. For the remaining multifamily communities, due

54

---



Table of Contents

to
their recent construction, property capital expenditures are not expected to be significant in the near term. When they do occur, we would expect recurring capital expenditures to be funded from
the BHMP CO-JV or the Property Entities' cash flow from operating activities. For
non-recurring capital expenditures, we would look to the capital sources noted above. As of March 31, 2010, neither we nor any of the BHMP CO-JVs have any other
significant commitments for property capital expenditures for operating multifamily communities.

Subsequent
to March 31, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale agreements for two multifamily communities for a total purchase price of approximately $79.2 million,
excluding closing costs. As of May 13, 2010, we have made a total of $1.5 million in earnest money deposits on these multifamily communities. If these agreements are consummated, we
expect that the acquisitions would be made through wholly owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership or newly created BHMP CO-JV. The consummations of each purchase remain subject to
substantial conditions, including, but not limited to, (1) the satisfaction of the conditions to the acquisitions contained in the relevant contracts; (2) no material adverse change
occurring relating to the multifamily community or in the local economic conditions; (3) our receipt of sufficient net proceeds from the Initial Public Offering and financing proceeds to make
the acquisitions; and (4) our receipt of satisfactory due diligence information, including environmental reports and lease information. Other investments may be identified in the future that we
may acquire before or instead of these multifamily communities.

Distributions

Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on its analysis of our performance over the previous
period, expectations of performance for future periods, including actual and anticipated operating cash flow, changes in market capitalization rates for investments suitable for our portfolio, capital
expenditure needs, general financial condition and other factors that our board deems relevant. The board's decision will be influenced, in substantial part, by its obligation to ensure that we
maintain our status as a REIT. Because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, distributions may not reflect our income earned in that particular
distribution period. Accordingly, distributions may be paid in anticipation of cash flow that we expect to receive during a later period in order to make distributions relatively uniform.

Until
proceeds from our Initial Public Offering are fully invested and generating sufficient operating cash flow to fully fund the payment of distributions to stockholders, we have and
will continue to pay some or all of our distributions from sources other than operating cash flow. We may, for example, generate cash to pay distributions from financing activities, components of
which may include proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow. In addition, from time to time,
our Advisor may agree to waive or defer all or a portion of the acquisition, asset management or other fees or incentives due to them, pay general administrative expenses or otherwise supplement
investor returns in order to increase the amount of cash that we have available to pay distributions to our stockholders.

The
cash distributions paid for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $5.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Distributions funded
through the issuance of shares under our
DRIP for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $5.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
cash flow from operating activities was ($0.5) million and $0.6 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, cash amounts distributed to stockholders
exceeded cash flow from operating activities by $5.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Such differences were funded from proceeds from our Initial Public Offering.

55

---



Table of Contents

The
following tables show the distributions paid and declared for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and cash flow from operating activities over the same periods (in
millions, except per share amounts):

Distributions Paid2010

Cash

Distributions
Reinvested
(DRIP)

Total

Cash Flow
from Operating
Activities

Total
Distributions
Declared

Declared
Distributions
Per ShareFirst Quarter

$
5.0

$
5.2

$
10.2

$
(0.5
)
$
11.1

$
0.173




Distributions Paid2009

Cash

Distributions
Reinvested
(DRIP)

Total

Cash Flow
from Operating
Activities

Total
Distributions
Declared

Declared
Distributions
Per ShareFirst Quarter

$
1.9

$
0.6

$
2.5

$
0.6

$
2.9

$
0.165


The
amount by which our distributions paid exceeded cash flow from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased from the three months ended
March 31, 2009, due to (a) increased acquisition activity coupled with acquisition expenses included in cash flow from operating activities, (b) a higher distribution rate,
(c) increased investments in multifamily communities in lease up and (d) increased proceeds raised from our Initial Public Offering (which resulted in additional shares on which
distributions are paid). Acquisition expenses included in cash flow from operating activities for three months ended March 31, 2010 were approximately $3.0 million with none for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. Acquisition expenses are funded from the proceeds from our Initial Public Offering. See the section above entitled "Results of Operations" for our discussion
of operating results and trends related to multifamily communities in lease up.

Over
the long term, we expect that more of our distributions (except with respect to distributions related to sales of our assets) will be paid from cash flow from operating activities,
including distributions from Co-Investment Ventures in excess of their reported earnings and our operations from wholly owned multifamily communities prior to deductions for acquisition
expenses. However, operating performance cannot be accurately predicted due to numerous factors, including our ability to raise and invest capital at favorable accretive yields, the financial
performance of our investments, the types and mix of investments in our portfolio, favorable financing terms and the accounting treatment of our investments in accordance with our accounting policies.
As a result, future distribution rates may change over time and future distributions declared and paid may continue to exceed cash flow from operating activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2010, the consolidated subsidiaries of BHMP CO-JVs are subject to senior mortgage loans as described
in the following table. These loans are senior to the equity investments by the BHMP CO-JVs. The lenders for these mortgage loans have no recourse to us or the applicable BHMP
CO-JV other than carve-out guarantees for certain matters such as environmental conditions,

56

---



Table of Contents

misuse
of funds and material misrepresentations. These loans payable are referred to as BHMP CO-JV level mortgage loans (amounts in millions):

BHMP CO-JV Level Borrowings

Loan Amount

Loan Type

Interest Rate

Maturity DateHalstead

$
24.0

Interest-only


6.17% - Fixed

September 2011(1)Waterford Place


59.8

Interest & principal


4.83% - Fixed

May 2013(1)(2)4550 Cherry Creek


28.6

Interest-only


4.23% - Fixed

March 2015(1)Calypso Apartments and Lofts


24.0

Interest-only


4.21% - Fixed

March 2015(1)Burroughs's Mill Apartment Homes


26.0

Interest-only(3)


5.29% - Fixed

October 2016(1)Total

$
162.4


As
of March 31, 2010, Property Entities reported by BHMP CO-JVs on the consolidated basis of accounting are subject to construction and mortgage loans as described in
the following table. These loans are senior to any equity or debt investments by the BHMP CO-JVs. The lenders for these loans have no recourse to us or the BHMP CO-JVs with
recourse only to the applicable Property Entities and to affiliates of the project developers that have provided completion and repayment guarantees. These loans payable are referred to as Property
Entity level borrowings (amounts in millions):

Property Entity Level Borrowings

Loan Amount

Loan Type

Interest Rate

Maturity DateBailey's Crossing

$
64.6

Interest-only

Monthly LIBOR + 275 bps

November 2011(2)(4)The Reserve at Johns Creek Walk


23.0

Interest-only

6.46% - fixed

March 2013(1)55 Hundred


52.7

Interest-only

Monthly LIBOR + 300 bps

November 2013(2)(4)Total

$
140.3


(1)These
loans may generally not be prepaid without the consent of the lender and/or payment of a prepayment penalty.(2)These
loans may be eligible for extension periods of up to two years, subject to certain conditions that may include certain fees and the commencement of
monthly principal payments.(3)Principal
payments commence in November 2011 at a 30-year amortization rate.(4)These
loans may generally be prepaid in full or in part without penalty.


A total of $47.0 million of the borrowings require maintenance of certain operating performance levels. As of March 31, 2010, we
believe all the BHMP CO-JVs were in compliance with all such requirements.

As
of March 31, 2010, six of the BHMP CO-JVs had made mezzanine or mortgage loan investments in Property Entities. These Property Entities and their affiliates have
provided the BHMP CO-JVs with collateral interests in the underlying properties, development projects, improvements, their interests in the Property Entities and/or financial and
performance guarantees of the developer and certain of its affiliates. These Property Entities have also obtained additional financing that is senior to our mezzanine or mortgage loan investments,
including for certain BHMP CO-JVs, their equity investment. The senior loans with respect to these Property Entities, as well as other senior loans in other Property Entities, are secured
by the developments and improvements and may be further secured with repayment and completion guarantees from the unaffiliated developers or their affiliates. We or the BHMP CO-JVs have no
contractual obligations on these senior level financings obtained by the Property Entities. These senior level financings have rates and terms that are different from our loan investment rates and
terms. In addition, financial institutions behind these loans have independent unfunded obligations under the loan terms.

57

---



Table of Contents

We
have no other off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations

We and/or Co-Investment Ventures (all of which were BHMP CO-JVs as of March 31, 2010) contract with
unaffiliated commercial property development companies and provide equity and/or loans for a particular project (our "Project Commitments"). We generally fund an initial amount under our Project
Commitments at contract inception and fund additional amounts as construction progresses, typically spanning one to three years. As of March 31, 2010, the BHMP CO-JVs held contracts
for equity investments and/or loans with a total commitment amount from its partners of approximately $522.5 million, and the BHMP CO-JVs have received approximately
$494.0 million. The BHMP CO-JVs will require additional capital from us and the BHMP Co-Investment Partner in order to fund the remaining commitments of
$28.5 million. Our share of the unfunded commitments is $18.3 million.

We
have contractual obligations related to our mortgage loan payable and credit facility. The following table summarizes our primary contractual obligations as of March 31, 2010
(amounts in millions):

Mortgage loan

Total

April-
December
2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

ThereafterPrincipal payments

$
93.8

$
0.4

$
0.6

$
0.6

$
25.1

$


$
67.1Interest expense


25.6


3.4


4.5


4.4


3.6


3.2


6.5119.4


3.8


5.1


5.0


28.7


3.2


73.6Credit Facility(1)Principal payments


10.0

















10.0Interest expense and fees


18.9


2.0


2.7


2.7


2.7


2.7


6.128.9


2.0


2.7


2.7


2.7


2.7


16.1Total

$
148.3

$
5.8

$
7.8

$
7.7

$
31.4

$
5.9

$
89.7


(1)The
principal amounts provided for our credit facility are based on amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2010, which are currently not due until final
maturity of the credit facility. If we are able to include additional collateral, we expect to increase the contractual principal obligations in future periods. The interest expense and fees for the
credit facility are based on the minimum interest and fees due as of March 31, 2010 under the credit facility. Amounts are included through the current stated maturity date of April 2017.


The
BHMP CO-JVs may become obligated to purchase all or a portion of the interests on two Property Entities under contingent sell options held by other investors on the
Property Entities: The Cameron and Grand Reserve. The options are generally exercisable after completion of the development and for a period of three years thereafter. The option price is set by
agreement and is either based on the fair value of the project at exercise or the cost of the project as defined in the respective agreement. As this amount is based on future events, we are not able
to estimate this amount if exercised; however, the estimated cost is approximately $145.5 million. Our approximate share is $80.0 million. The amount of cash required to fund these
purchase options may be substantially less than the option price due to the applicable BHMP CO-JV's notes receivable investment, assumption of existing Property Entity financing and new
financing sources. As of March 31, 2010, no sell options are exercisable.

58

---



Table of Contents

Each
of the BHMP CO-JV equity investments that include unaffiliated third-party partners also includes buy/sell provisions. Under these provisions and during specific
periods, a partner could make an offer to purchase the interest of the other partner and the other partner would have the option to accept the offer or purchase the offering partner's interest at that
price. As of March 31, 2010, no such offers are outstanding.

The
Bailey's Crossing BHMP CO-JV may become obligated to purchase a limited partnership interest in the Bailey's Crossing Property Entity at a price set through an appraisal
process. The obligation is for a one-year period commencing November 2011. As this amount is based on future events and valuations, we are not able to estimate this amount if exercised;
however, the limited partner's invested capital as of March 31, 2010 is approximately $11.8 million. Our approximate share is $6.5 million.

See
the section above entitled "Long-Term Liquidity, Acquisitions and Property Financing" for a description of purchase and sales agreements that were executed subsequent to
March 31, 2010 that have not closed.

The
multifamily communities in which we have investments may have commitments to provide affordable housing. Under these arrangements, we generally receive from the resident a
below-market rent, which is determined by a local or national authority. In certain arrangements, a local or national housing authority makes payments covering some or substantially all of the
difference between the restricted rent paid by residents and market rents. In connection with our acquisition of The Gallery at NoHo Commons, we assumed an obligation to provide affordable housing
through 2048. As partial reimbursement for this obligation, the housing authority will make level annual payments of approximately $2.0 million through 2028 and no reimbursement for the
remaining 20-year period. We may also be required to reimburse the housing authority if certain operating results are achieved on a cumulative basis during the term of the agreement. At
the acquisition, we recorded a liability of $14.0 million based on the fair value of terms over the life of the agreement. We will record rental revenue from the housing authority on a straight
line basis, recognizing a portion of the collections from deferred lease revenues. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have approximately $1.0 million and
$1.3 million, respectively, of carrying value for deferred lease revenues and other related liabilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we have recognized approximately
$0.3 million of deferred revenue amortization related to our The Gallery at NoHo Commons affordable housing obligations.

Our
board of directors has authorized a share redemption program. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, our board of directors approved redemptions for 96,815 shares of
common stock for approximately $0.8 million. We have funded and intend to continue funding these redemptions from the proceeds from our Initial Public Offering.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

Funds from operations ("FFO") is a non-GAAP performance financial measure that is widely recognized as a measure of REIT
operating performance. We use FFO as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts to be net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP excluding extraordinary items, as
defined by GAAP, and gains (or losses) from sales of property (including deemed sales and settlements of pre-existing relationships), plus depreciation and amortization on real estate
assets, and after related adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and subsidiaries and noncontrolling interests. We believe that FFO is helpful to our investors and our management
as a measure of operating performance because it excludes real estate-related depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, and extraordinary items, and as a result, when
compared year to year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, general and administrative expenses, and

59

---



Table of Contents

interest
costs, which are not immediately apparent from net income. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate and
intangibles diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation
of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting alone to be insufficient. As a result, our management believes that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP
presentations, is helpful for our investors in understanding our performance. Factors that impact FFO include start-up costs, fixed costs, delay in buying assets, lower yields on cash held
in accounts, income from portfolio properties and other portfolio assets, interest rates on acquisition financing and operating expenses. In addition, FFO will be affected by the types of investments
in our and/or our Co-Investment Ventures' portfolios, which include, but are not limited to, equity and mezzanine, mortgage and bridge loan investments in existing operating properties and
properties in various stages of development and the accounting treatment of the investments in accordance with our accounting policies.

In
addition to FFO, we use modified funds from operations ("Modified Funds from Operations" or "MFFO") which excludes from FFO acquisition expenses, impairment charges and adjustments to
fair value for derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting, to further evaluate our operating performance. We believe that MFFO with these adjustments, like those already included in FFO, is
helpful as a measure of operating performance because it excludes costs that management considers more reflective of investing activities or non-operating valuation changes. As explained
below, management's evaluation of our operating performance excludes the items considered in the calculation based on the following economic considerations:



60

---







Table of Contents

By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors to better align their analysis with management's analysis of
long-term, core operating activities. MFFO also provides useful information in analyzing comparability between reporting periods. Because MFFO is primarily affected by the same factors as
FFO but without non-operating valuation changes, we believe fluctuations in MFFO are more indicative of changes in operating activities, and MFFO is more comparable in evaluating our
performance over time and as compared to other real estate companies, which may not be as involved in acquisition activities and derivatives or as affected by impairments.

FFO
or MFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), as an indication of our liquidity, nor is either indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs,
including our ability to make distributions; both should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. MFFO also excludes impairment charges and unrealized gains and losses related to fair
value adjustments for derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting. Although the related holdings are not held for sale or used in trading activities, if the holdings were sold currently, it could
affect our operating results. Our FFO and MFFO as presented may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs.

For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, MFFO per share was impacted by the increase in net proceeds realized from our existing offering of shares. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010, we issued 14.5 million shares of our common stock, increasing our outstanding shares by 25%. The proceeds from this issuance were temporarily invested in
short-term cash equivalents until they could be invested in multifamily communities. Due to lower interest rates on cash equivalent
investments, interest earnings were minimal. We expect to invest these proceeds in higher-earning multifamily community investments consistent with our investment policies.

Our
MFFO was also impacted by our real estate investments in development and lease ups. Until these investments reach stabilization, property operating costs and interest expense in
excess of rental revenue will adversely impact MFFO per share. We believe our investment basis in these multifamily communities is favorable. For example, our BHMP CO-JVs' investments in
Forty55 Lofts, San Sebastian and Cyan/PDX, high quality projects acquired at below-replacement value, require a lease-up period to achieve stabilization. When stabilized, these assets will
be well positioned for long-term returns. We believe these investments and our other development investments will add value to our stockholders over our longer-term investment
horizon, even if this results in less current-period earnings. See the "Results of Operations" section above for a quantification of the results of our lease ups and development investments.

The
following section presents our calculation of FFO and MFFO and provides additional information related to our operations (in millions, except per share amounts):

For the Three
Months Ended
March 31,2010

2009Net income (loss)

$
(9.0
)
$
0.1Real estate depreciation and amortization


8.0


0.4FFO


(1.0
)

0.5Acquisition expenses


3.0


MFFO

$
2.0

$
0.5GAAP weighted average common shares


64.2


17.4MFFO per share

$
0.03

$
0.03




61

---



Table of Contents



As
noted above, we believe FFO and MFFO are helpful to investors and our management as measures of operating performance. FFO and MFFO are not indicative of our cash available to fund
distributions since other uses of cash, such as capital expenditures and principal payment of debt related to investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, are not deducted when
calculating FFO and MFFO.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The following critical accounting policies and estimates apply to both us and our Co-Investment Ventures, respectively.

Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate these judgments, assumptions and estimates for changes which would affect the reported amounts. These estimates are based on
management's historical industry experience and on various other judgments and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these judgments,
assumptions and estimates. Our significant judgments, assumptions and estimates include the consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIEs"), accounting for notes receivable, the allocation of the
purchase price of acquired properties and evaluating our real estate-related investments for impairment.



Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of variable interest entities in which we are the primary
beneficiary and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control. All inter-company transactions, balances and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Interests in entities are
evaluated based on applicable GAAP, which requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. If the interest in the entity is determined to not be a VIE, then the
entities are evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control and/or substantive participation rights under the respective ownership
agreement.

There
are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we will make an investment will be a VIE and if so, if we will be the primary beneficiary. The entity will
be evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity. There are some guidelines as to what the
minimum equity at risk should be, but the percentage can vary depending upon the industry or the type of operations of the entity and it will be up to our Advisor to determine that minimum percentage
as it relates to our business and the facts surrounding each of our acquisitions. In addition, even if the entity's equity at risk is a very low percentage, our Advisor will be required to evaluate
the equity at risk compared to the entity's expected future losses to determine if there could still in fact be sufficient equity in the entity. Determining expected future losses involves assumptions
of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses
and allocating those losses between the equity

62

---



Table of Contents

owners,
subordinated lenders or other variable interests. The determination will also be based on an evaluation of the voting rights of partners in relation to their economic participation in benefits
or obligation to absorb losses. As partnership agreements have various terms which may change over time or based on future results, these evaluations require complex analysis and weighting of
different factors. A change in the judgments, assumptions, allocations and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an
investment on the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

For
other investments, we must evaluate whether we have control of an entity, where there are judgments involved in determining if provisions in governing agreements provide protective
or participating rights for us, our Co-Investment Ventures or other equity owners. This evaluation includes an assessment of multiple terms including their economic effect to the
operations of the entity, how relevant the term is to the recurring operations of the entity and the weighing of each item to determine in the aggregate which owner, if any, has control. These
assessments would affect whether an entity should be consolidated or reported on the equity method, the effects of which could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.



Notes receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and
costs. Included in notes receivable are both mortgage notes receivable and mezzanine notes receivable. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized
as adjustments to interest income over the lives of the related loans.

In
accounting for notes receivable by us or our Co-Investment Ventures, there are judgments related to whether the investments are loans, investments in joint ventures or
acquisitions of real estate. We evaluate whether the loans contain any rights to participate in expected residual profits, the loans provide sufficient collateral or qualifying guarantees or include
other characteristics of a loan. As a result of our review, neither our wholly owned loan nor the loans made through our BHMP CO-JVs contain a right to participate in expected
residual profits. In addition, the Property Entities or project borrowers remain obligated to pay principal and interest due on the loans with sufficient collateral, reserves or qualifying guarantees
to account for the investments as loans.

We
assess notes receivable for impairment. Based on specific circumstances we determine the probability that there has been an adverse change in the estimated cash flows of the
contractual payments for the notes receivable. We then assess the impairment based on the probability to collect all contractual amounts including factors such as the general or market-specific
economic conditions for the project; the financial conditions of the borrower and guarantors, if any; the degree of any defaults by the borrower on any of its obligations; the assessment of the
underlying project's financial viability and other collateral; the length of time and extent of the condition; and our or the Co-Investment Venture's intent and ability to retain its
investment in the issuer for a period sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market value. If the impairment is probable, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference
between our or the Co-Investment Venture's (all of which have been made through BHMP CO-JVs) investment in the loan and the present value of the estimated cash flows
discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. Where we have the intent and the ability to foreclose on our security interest in the property, we will use the property's fair value as a basis for
the impairment.

There
are judgments involved in determining the probability for an impairment to collect contractual amounts. As these types of loans are generally investment specific based on the
particular loan terms and the underlying project characteristics, there is usually not any secondary market to evaluate impairments. Accordingly, we must rely on our subjective judgments and
individual weightings

63

---



Table of Contents

of
the specific factors. If loans are considered impaired, then judgments and estimates are required to determine the projected cash flows for the loan, considering the borrower's or, if applicable,
the guarantor's financial condition and the consideration and valuation of the secured property and any other collateral.

Changes
in these facts or in our judgments and assessments of these facts could result in impairment losses which could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.



As of March 31, 2010, all of our Co-Investment Ventures are BHMP CO-JVs. We are the manager of
each BHMP CO-JV's affairs, but the operation of BHMP CO-JVs are conducted in accordance with operating plans prepared by us and approved by us and the BHMP
Co-Investment Partner. In addition, without the consent of both members of the BHMP CO-JV, the manager may not generally approve or disapprove on behalf of the
BHMP CO-JV certain major decisions affecting the BHMP CO-JV, such as (i) selling or otherwise disposing of the investment or any other property having a
value in excess of $100,000, (ii) selling any additional interests in the BHMP CO-JV, (iii) approving initial and annual operating plans and capital expenditures or
(iv) incurring or materially modifying any indebtedness of the BHMP CO-JV in excess of $100,000. As a result of the equal substantive participating rights possessed by each
partner in the ordinary course of business, no single party controls each venture; accordingly, we account for each BHMP CO-JV using the equity method of accounting. The equity
method of accounting requires these investments to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently increased (decreased) for our share of net income (loss), including eliminations for our share of
inter-company transactions, and reduced when distributions are received.

Each
of the Property Entities have different profit sharing interests, some of which have numerous allocation and distribution provisions where certain equity investors receive preferred
interests or deferred participations. We allocate income and loss for determining our equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures based on the underlying economic effect or participation in
the benefit or loss. Although our policy is to use the concepts of a hypothetical liquidation at book value, judgment is required to determine which owners are bearing economic benefits or losses,
particularly as properties move from development to operations and guarantees and other priority payments are triggered or removed. A change in these judgments could result in greater or lesser
amounts of equity in earnings.

When
we or a BHMP CO-JV acquire a controlling interest in a business previously accounted for as a noncontrolling investment, a gain or loss is recorded for the
difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the investment in the real estate joint venture and in some instances pre-existing relationships. This analysis, which is from
the perspective of market participants, requires determination of fair values for investments and contractual relationships where there are no secondary markets. Accordingly, we must rely on our
subjective judgments using models with the best available information. Changes in these judgments could significantly impact our results of operations and the carrying amount of our assets and
liabilities.



For real estate properties acquired by us or our Co-Investment Ventures classified as business combinations, we allocate
the purchase price, after adjusting for settlement of any pre-existing relationships, to the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land, inclusive of associated rights, and buildings,
any assumed debt, identified intangible assets and liabilities and asset retirement obligations based on their fair values. Identified intangible assets and liabilities consist of the fair value of
above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases and contractual rights. Goodwill is recognized as of the acquisition date and measured as the aggregate fair value of the
consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Likewise,

64

---



Table of Contents

a
bargain purchase gain is recognized in current earnings when the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree is less than the fair value of
the identifiable net assets acquired.

The
fair value of any tangible assets acquired, expected to consist of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the
"as-if-vacant" value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements. Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less
depreciation or estimates of the relative fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods. Buildings are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging
from 25 to 35 years using the straight-line method. Improvements are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 15 years using the
straight-line method. When we acquire rights to use land or improvements through contractual rights rather than fee simple interests, we determine the value of the use of these assets
based on the relative fair value of the assets after considering the contractual rights and the fair value of similar assets. Assets acquired under these contractual rights are classified as
intangibles and amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the contractual term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Contractual rights related to land or air rights that
are substantively separated from depreciating assets are amortized over the life of the contractual term or, if no term is
provided, are classified as indefinite-lived intangibles. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated at each reporting period to determine whether the indefinite useful life is appropriate.

We
determine the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks
associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) estimates of current-market
lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the
remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or
intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the above determined lease term.

The
total value of identified real estate intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place lease values, in-place leasing commissions and tenant
relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. The aggregate value of in-place
leases acquired and tenant relationships is determined by applying a fair value model. The estimates of fair value of in-place leases include an estimate of carrying costs during the
expected lease up periods for the respective spaces considering then current market conditions. In estimating the carrying costs that would have otherwise been incurred had the leases not been in
place, we include such items as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses as well as projected rental revenue during the expected lease up period based on then current market
conditions. The estimates of the fair value of tenant relationships also include costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and tenant improvements as well as an estimate of
the likelihood of renewal as determined on a tenant-by-tenant basis.

We
amortize the value of in-place leases and in-place tenant improvements over the remaining term of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship
intangibles is amortized over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods, but in no event exceeding the remaining depreciable life of the building. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to
expiration of the initial terms, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and tenant relationship intangibles is charged to expense.

We
determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled debt service payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities that we

65

---



Table of Contents

believe
we could obtain. Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan.

We
make assumptions and estimates in determining these allocations, including market rental rates, physical and economic obsolescence, lease-up periods and discount rates. A
change in their assumptions could result in the various categories of our real estate assets or related intangibles being overstated or understated which could result in an overstatement or
understatement of depreciation or amortization expense or rental income.



For properties wholly owned by us or our Co-Investment Ventures, including all related intangibles, we monitor events and
changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment
by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset including its eventual disposition, to the carrying amount of the asset. In the
event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value. In
addition, we evaluate indefinite-lived intangible assets for possible impairment at least annually by comparing the fair values with the carrying values. Fair value is generally estimated by valuation
of similar assets.

For
real estate we own through an investment in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture or other similar real estate investment structure, at each reporting date we compare the
estimated fair value of our real estate investment to the carrying value. An impairment charge is recorded to the extent the fair value of our real estate investment is less than the carrying amount
and the decline in value is determined to be other than a temporary decline.

In
evaluating our investments for impairment, we make several judgments, assumptions and estimates, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of our investments in
real estate, the estimated future cash flows from our investments in real estate and the projected sales price of each of our investments in real estate. Recently, domestic financial and real estate
markets have experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty with fewer non-distressed secondary transactions available on which to base these estimates and assumptions. Our estimates of
fair value are based on information available to management as to conditions present as of the assessment date. A change in these judgments, assumptions and estimates could result in understating or
overstating the book value of our investments which could be material to our financial statements.



In connection with our assessments and determinations of fair value for many real estate assets and financial instruments, there are
generally not available observable market price inputs for substantially the same items. Accordingly, we make assumptions and use various estimates and pricing models, including, but not limited to,
the estimated useful lives of the assets, the cost of replacing certain assets, discount and interest rates used to determine present values and market rental rates. Many of these estimates are from
the perspective of market participants and will also be obtained from independent third-party appraisals. However, we will be responsible for the source and use of these estimates. A change in these
estimates and assumptions could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an amendment to the authoritative guidance on the consolidation
of variable interest entities. This guidance eliminates

66

---



Table of Contents

exceptions
to consolidating qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the primary beneficiary, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine
whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This guidance also contains a new requirement that any term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive
effect on an entity's status as a variable interest entity, a company's power over a variable interest entity, or a company's obligation to absorb losses or its rights to receive benefits of an entity
must be disregarded in evaluating whether an entity is a variable interest entity. This guidance was applicable to us beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Inflation

The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past several years due to a relatively low inflation
rate. The majority of our fixed-lease terms are less than 12 months and reset to market if renewed. The majority of our leases also contain protection
provisions applicable to reimbursement billings for utilities. Should inflation return, due to the short term nature of our leases, multifamily investments are considered good inflation hedges.

REIT Tax Election

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code and have qualified as a REIT since the year
ended December 31, 2007. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable
income to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level. We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT
under the Code, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to remain qualified as a REIT.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower
overall borrowing costs. To achieve the financing objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with what we believe are the lowest margins available and in some cases, the ability
to convert variable rates to fixed rates either directly or through interest rate hedges. With regard to variable rate financing, we manage interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and
monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.

As
of March 31, 2010, we had approximately $93.8 million of outstanding debt on our wholly owned communities at a weighted average, fixed interest rate of approximately
4.8%. Our BHMP CO-JVs with wholly owned communities and our BHMP CO-JVs with equity in Property Entities that had borrowed aggregate senior debt of approximately
$162.4 million and $305.4 million, respectively (which amount consists of third-party first mortgages and construction loans and excludes loans made to the Property Entities by the
BHMP CO-JVs or us). Of this amount, approximately $185.4 million was at fixed interest rates with a weighted average of approximately 5.2% and $282.4 million was at
variable interest rates with a weighted average of monthly LIBOR plus 2.3%.

As
of March 31, 2010, we have only one wholly owned note receivable with a carrying value of approximately $2.5 million and a fixed interest rate of 10%. Our
BHMP CO-JVs had
notes receivable from Property Entities of approximately $83.2 million, all of which were at fixed rates, with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 10.6%.

Interest
rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt or fixed rate real estate loan receivable unless such instruments are traded
or are otherwise

67

---



Table of Contents

terminated
prior to maturity. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. As we do not expect to trade or sell our fixed rate debt instruments prior to
maturity and the amounts due under such instruments would be limited to the outstanding principal balance and any accrued and unpaid interest, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and
the resulting change in fair value of our fixed rate instruments, would have a significant impact on our operations.

Conversely,
movements in interest rates on variable rate debt, loans receivable and real estate securities would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not significantly affect
the fair value of those instruments. As of March 31, 2010, we did not have any loans receivable or real estate securities with variable interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate changes
primarily as a result of our variable rate debt used to acquire or hold our wholly owned multifamily communities and our wholly owned cash investments. We quantify our exposure to interest rate risk
based on how changes in interest rates affect our net income. We consider changes in the 30-day LIBOR rate to be most indicative of our interest rate exposure as it is a function of the
base rate for our credit facility and is reasonably correlated to changes in our earnings rate on our cash investments. We consider increases of 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% in the 30-day LIBOR
rate to be reflective of reasonable changes we may experience in the current interest rate environment. The table below reflects the annual effect of an increase in the 30-day LIBOR to our
net income related to our significant variable interest rate exposures for our wholly owned assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2010 (amounts in millions, where positive amounts reflect an
increase in income and bracketed amounts reflect a decrease in income):

Increases in
Interest Rates1.5%

1.0%

0.5%Credit facility interest expense

$
(0.2
)
$
(0.1
)
$
(0.1
)Cash investments


2.0


1.3


0.7Total

$
1.8

$
1.2

$
0.6


There
is no assurance that we would realize such income or expense as such changes in interest rates could alter our asset or liability positions or strategies in response to such
changes. The table also does not reflect changes in operations related to our unconsolidated investments in real estate joint ventures, where we do not have control over financing matters and
substantial portions of variable rate debt related to multifamily development projects where interest is capitalized.

We
do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations as of March 31, 2010.

Item 4T.    Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act"), our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of March 31, 2010, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in this report is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

68

---



Table of Contents

We
believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

69

---





Table of Contents

PART II  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings.

In our normal course of business, we are subject to legal proceedings that are not significant to our operations. We are not party to,
and our properties are not subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors contained in Item 1A set forth in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 31, 2010.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

On September 2, 2008, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-148414),
covering a public offering (our "Initial Public Offering") of up to 250,000,000 shares of common stock, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933. Our Initial Public Offering commenced
on September 5, 2008 and is ongoing. We expect to sell the shares offered in our Initial Public Offering over a two-year period. Under rules promulgated by the SEC, in some
circumstances we may continue the offering beyond this date. Our board of directors has the discretion to extend the offering period for the shares offered under the DRIP up to the sixth anniversary
of the termination of the primary offering. We may reallocate the shares of common stock being offered between the primary offering and the distribution reinvestment plan.

We
are offering a maximum of 200 million shares in our primary offering at an aggregate offering price of up to $2 billion, or $10.00 per share with discounts available to
certain categories of purchasers. The 50 million shares offered under the DRIP are initially being offered at an aggregate offering price of $475 million, or $9.50 per share. Behringer
Securities LP, an affiliate of our advisor, is the dealer manager of the Initial Public Offering. As of March 31, 2010, we had sold approximately 57.7 million shares of our common
stock in our Initial Public Offering on a best efforts basis pursuant to the offering for gross offering proceeds of approximately $575.1 million.

From
the commencement of the Initial Public Offering through March 31, 2010, we incurred expenses of approximately $70.7 million in connection with the issuance and
distribution of the registered securities pursuant to the offering all of which was paid to our advisor.

From
the commencement of the Initial Public Offering through March 31, 2010, the net offering proceeds to us from the Initial Public Offering, including the distribution
reinvestment plan, after deducting the total expenses incurred described above, were approximately $504.4 million. From the commencement of the Initial Public Offering through March 31,
2010, we had used approximately $398.8 million of such net proceeds to purchase interests in real estate, net of notes payable. Of the amount used for the purchase of these investments,
$10.7 million was paid to our advisor, Behringer Harvard Multifamily Advisors I, as acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursement.

Recent Shares of Unregistered Securities

During the period covered by this Quarterly Report, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities
Act of 1933.

70

---



Table of Contents

Share Redemption Program

Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us after they have
held them for at least one year, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program. Our board of directors can amend the provisions of our share redemption program without the
approval of our stockholders. The terms on which we redeem shares may differ between redemptions upon a stockholder's death, "qualifying disability" (as defined in the share redemption program) or
confinement to a long-term care facility (collectively referred to herein as "Exceptional Redemptions") and all other redemptions (referred to herein as "Ordinary Redemptions"). The
purchase price for shares redeemed under the redemption program is set forth below.

In
the case of Ordinary Redemptions, the purchase price per share will equal 90% of (i) the most recently disclosed estimated value per share as determined in accordance with our
valuation policy, less (ii) the aggregate distributions per share of any net sale proceeds from the sale of one or more of our assets, or other special distributions so designated by our board
of directors, distributed to stockholders after the valuation was determined (the "Valuation Adjustment"); provided, however, that the purchase price per share shall not exceed: (1) prior to
the first valuation conducted by the board of directors, or a committee thereof (the "Initial Board Valuation"), under the valuation policy, 90% of (i) average price per share the original
purchaser or purchasers of shares paid to us for all of his or her shares (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock)
(the "Original Share Price") less (ii) the aggregate distributions per share of any net sale proceeds from the sale of one or more of our assets, or other special distributions so designated by
the board of directors, distributed to stockholders prior to the redemption date (the "Special Distributions"); or (2) on or after the Initial Board Valuation, the Original Share Price less any
Special Distributions.

In
the case of Exceptional Redemptions, the purchase price per share will be equal to: (1) prior to the Initial Board Valuation, the Original Share Price less any Special
Distributions; or (2) on or after the Initial Board Valuation, the most recently disclosed valuation less any Valuation Adjustment, provided, however, that the purchase price per share may not
exceed the Original Share Price less any Special Distributions.

Notwithstanding
the redemption prices set forth above, our board of directors may determine, whether pursuant to formulae or processes approved or set by our board of directors, the
redemption price of the shares, which may differ between Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions; provided, however, that we must provide at least 30 days' notice to stockholders
before applying this new price determined by our board of directors.

Any
shares approved for redemption will be redeemed on a periodic basis as determined from time to time by our board of directors, and no less frequently than annually. We will not
redeem, during any twelve-month period, more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. Generally, the
cash available for redemption on any particular date will be limited to the proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan during the period consisting of the preceding four fiscal quarters for
which financial statements are available, less any cash already used for redemptions during the same period, plus, if we had positive operating cash flow during such preceding four fiscal quarters, 1%
of all operating cash flow during such preceding four fiscal quarters. The redemption limitations apply to all redemptions, whether Ordinary or Exceptional Redemptions.

71

---



Table of Contents

During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, our board of directors approved the redemption of shares as follows:

2010

Total Number of
Shares Redeemed

Average Price
Paid Per Share

Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs

Maximum Number of
Shares That May Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or ProgramsJanuary


1,183

$
8.97


1,183



(1)February




$



March(2)


95,632

$
8.66


95,632



(1)96,815

$
8.66


96,815


(1)A
description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our redemption program is included in the narrative preceding this table.(2)The
March 2010 redemptions were paid in April 2010.


Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.    (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.    Other Information.

On May 13, 2010, our board of directors adopted an amended and restated valuation policy in respect of estimating the per share
value of our common stock. Among other immaterial revisions, the amendments clarify that the per share estimated value may be
developed from data that is as of a date not more than 18 months prior to the effective date of the estimated valuation and that in general we will consider a new estimated valuation every
18 months.

The
information set forth above with respect to the amended and restated valuation policy does not purport to be complete in scope and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of
the amended and restated valuation policy, which is filed as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and is incorporated into this report by reference.

Item 6.    Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number

Description3.1

Articles of Restatement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 8, 20083.2

Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on March 1, 20104.1

Form of Subscription Agreement (included as Exhibit A to prospectus), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to
its Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on April 27, 2010, Commission File No. 333-1484144.2

Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (included as Exhibit B to prospectus), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to its Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on April 27, 2010, Commission File No. 333-148414


72

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description4.3

Amended and Restated Automatic Purchase Plan (included as Exhibit C to prospectus), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Post-Effective Amendment
No. 6 to its Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on April 27, 2010, Commission File No. 333-1484144.4

Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2009, Commission File No. 333-1484144.5

Statement regarding Restrictions on Transferability of Shares of Common Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11/A filed on May 9,
200810.1

Third Amended and Restated Advisory Management Agreement, dated January 29, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 201010.2

Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 200810.3

Amended and Restated Incentive Award Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11/A filed on May 9, 2008, Commission File
No. 333-14841410.4

Service Mark Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 200810.5

Senior and Junior Mezzanine Promissory Notes by and between SW 131 St. Rose Mezzanine Borrower LLC as borrower and Behringer Harvard St. Rose REIT, LLC as lender dated December 31, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 200910.6

Senior and Junior Mezzanine Loan Agreements by and between SW 131 St. Rose Mezzanine Borrower LLC as borrower and Behringer Harvard St. Rose REIT, LLC as lender dated December 31, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 200910.7

Senior and Junior Mezzanine Deeds of Trust, Assignments of Rents and Leases, Security Agreements, Fixture Filings and Financing Statements by and between SW 132 St. Rose Senior Borrower LLC as grantor and
Behringer Harvard St. Rose REIT, LLC as lender dated December 31, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 200910.8

Mezzanine Guaranty Agreement by and between CFP Residential, L.P., Kenneth J. Valach, Bruce Hart and J. Ronald Terwilliger collectively as guarantor and Behringer St. Rose REIT, LLC as lender dated
December 31, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 200910.9

Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement by and between Bank of America, N.A. on behalf of senior construction lenders and land loan lender and Behringer Harvard St. Rose REIT, LLC as subordinate lender
dated December 31, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 200910.10

Sale, Purchase and Escrow Agreement between Verandah Owner Limited Partnership as seller and Harvard Property Trust, LLC as purchaser dated January 26, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2009


73

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description10.11

Assignment and Assumption of Sale, Purchase and Escrow Agreement by and between Harvard Property Trust, LLC as assignor and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as assignee dated January 28, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 200910.12

First Amendment to Sale, Purchase and Escrow Agreement by and between Verandah Owner Limited Partnership as seller and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as purchaser dated February 20, 2009, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 200910.13

Agreement of Sale and Purchase and Joint Escrow Instructions by and between Waterford Place Apartments, LLC as seller and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as buyer dated May 29, 2009, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 200910.14

Revivor and First Amendment to Agreement of Sale and Purchase and Joint Escrow Instructions by and between Waterford Place Apartments, LLC as seller and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as buyer dated
July 2, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 200910.15

Second Amendment to Agreement of Sale and Purchase and Joint Escrow Instructions by and between Waterford Place Apartments, LLC as seller and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as buyer dated July 13,
 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 200910.16

Assignment and Assumption of Sale, Purchase and Escrow Agreement by and between Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as assignor and Behringer Harvard Waterford Place REIT, LLC as assignee dated
August 4, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 200910.17

(First Lien) Assumption Agreement by and among Waterford Place Apartments, LLC, Behringer Harvard Waterford Place REIT, LLC and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation dated August 25, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.18

(Second Lien) Assumption Agreement by and among Waterford Place Apartments, LLC, Behringer Harvard Waterford Place REIT, LLC and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation dated August 25, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.19

Multifamily Note by Waterford Place Apartments, LLC in favor of Deutsche Bank Berkshire Mortgage, Inc. dated March 31, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's
Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.20

Multifamily Note by Waterford Place Apartments, LLC in favor of Berkshire Mortgage Finance Limited Partnership dated April 1, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's
Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.21

Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by Waterford Place Apartments, LLC for the benefit of Deutsche Bank Berkshire Mortgage, Inc. dated March 31, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2009


74

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description10.22

Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by Waterford Place Apartments, LLC for the benefit of Berkshire Mortgage Finance Limited Partnership dated April 1, 2004,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.23

Limited Liability Company Agreement of Behringer Harvard Waterford Place Venture, LLC by and between Behringer Harvard Waterford Place, LLC and Behringer Harvard Master Partnership I LP dated
May 29, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.24

Sale, Purchase and Escrow Agreement by and between SAF Burroughs Mills, LLC, as seller, and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as buyer dated August 7, 2009, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.25

Assignment of Sale, Purchase and Escrow Agreement by and between Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as assignor and Behringer Harvard Burroughs Mill REIT, LLC as assignee dated September 12, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.26

Agreement of Sale by and between SF No Ho LLC as seller and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as buyer dated August 12, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's
Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.27

Assignment of Agreement of Sale by and between Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP, as assignor, and Behringer Harvard NOHO, LLC as assignee effective August 19, 2009, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.28

Amendment to Agreement of Sale by and between SF No Ho LLC as seller and Behringer Harvard NOHO, LLC as buyer dated September 17, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's
Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.29

Multifamily Note by Behringer Harvard NOHO, LLC in favor of Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. dated October 28, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on
November 13, 200910.30

Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by Behringer Harvard NOHO, LLC for the benefit of Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. dated October 28, 2009, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.31

Owner Participation Agreement by and between The Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles and SL No Ho, LLC dated December, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Company's
Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.32

First Implementation Agreement to Owner Participation Agreement by and between The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles and SL No Ho, LLC dated November, 2002, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.33

Second Implementation Agreement to Owner Participation Agreement by and between The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles and SL No Ho, LLC dated December 12, 2003, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2009


75

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description10.34

Third Implementation Agreement to Owner Participation Agreement by and between The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles and SL No Ho, LLC dated October 1, 2004, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.35

Agreement Containing Covenants Affecting Real Property by and between The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles and SF No Ho, LLC dated December 19, 2003, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.36

Subarea "A" Partial Assignment of Owner Participation Agreement and Consent to Assignment by and among SF No Ho, LLC, Behringer Harvard NOHO, LLC and The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los
Angeles dated September 17, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.37

Agreement of Sale and Purchase and Joint Escrow Instructions by and between Acacia on Santa Rosa Creek, LLC, as seller, and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP, as buyer, dated October 12, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 200910.38

Limited Liability Company Agreement of Behringer Harvard Baileys Venture, LLC by and between Behringer Harvard Baileys, LLC and Behringer Harvard Master Partnership I LP dated June 26, 2007,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on December 8, 2009, Commission File No. 333-14814110.39

Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Behringer Harvard Baileys Investors, L.P. among Behringer Harvard Baileys GP, LLC as general partner and the limited partners named therein, dated
December 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on December 8, 2009, Commission File No. 333-14814110.40

Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Park Crest, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010
Building 5 Associates, LLC as seller and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as buyer dated January 28, 201010.41

First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Park Crest Building 5 Associates, LLC as seller and Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as buyer dated February 26, 2010, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 201010.42

Assignment of Agreement of Sale by and between Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP as assignor and Behringer Harvard Park Crest, LLC as assignee effective March 8, 2010, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.42 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 201010.43

Credit Agreement by and among Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP and Behringer Harvard Orange, LLC collectively as borrower and NorthMarq Capital, LLC as lender dated March 26, 2010,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010


76

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description10.44

Multifamily Revolving Credit Note by Behringer Harvard Multifamily OP I LP and Behringer Harvard Orange, LLC as borrower in favor of NorthMarq Capital, LLC dated March 26, 2010, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 201010.45

Multifamily Open-End Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement between Behringer Harvard Orange, LLC as mortgagor and NorthMarq Capital, LLC as mortgagee dated March 26, 2010, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 31, 201010.46

Form of Dealer Manager Agreement, including Form of Selected Dealer Agreement and Form of Selected Investment Advisor Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-11/A filed on August 26, 2008, Commission File No. 333-14841431.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1*

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**99.1*

Amended and Restated Policy for Estimation of Common Stock Value of Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc, effective May 13, 2010


*Filed
herewith**In
accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.


77

---





Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

BEHRINGER HARVARD MULTIFAMILY REIT I, INC.Dated: May 17, 2010

/s/ HOWARD S. GARFIELD Howard S. Garfield Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


78

---