alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-154]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32747]


Raymond L. Ortman--Continuance in Control Exemption--Winamac 
Southern Railway Company, Inc.

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission under 49 U.S.C. 10505 exempts from the prior 
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11343-44 the continuance in control 
by Raymond L. Ortman of the Winamac Southern Railway Company, Inc. 
(WSR), subject to standard labor protective conditions. The petition 
for exemption was filed because of the Ortman family interests in 
Kokomo Grain Company and Central Properties, Incorporated, which 
controls Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis and Central Railroad 
Company of Indiana. In order to insulate himself from unauthorized 
control during the pendency of this proceeding, Mr. Ortman placed all 
of his shares of WSR stock into an independent voting trust.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on February 4, 1996. Petitions 
to stay must be filed by January 16, 1996. Petitions to reopen must be 
filed by January 25, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to Finance Docket No. 32747 to: 
(1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate Commerce 
Commission,<SUP>1 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423; 
and (2) Thomas F. McFarland, Jr., 20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 3118, 
Chicago, IL 60606-3101.

    \1\  Legislation to sunset the Commission on December 31, 1995, 
and transfer remaining functions is currently under consideration. 
Until further notice, parties submitting pleadings should continue 
to use the current name and address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., Room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance 
for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services at (202) 
927-5721.]

    Decided: December 27, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Owen, and 
Commissioner Simmons.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-154 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1528 Filed 03/10/23 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21


         Amendment to Section 6. Option Prices of the 1999 Stock Option Plan

6.       Option Prices.

The purchase price of the Common Stock under each option shall not be less than
100% of the fair market value of the stock at the time of the granting of the
option. Such fair market value shall generally be considered to be the mean
between the high and low prices of the Company's Common Stock as traded on the
New York Stock Exchange on the day the option is granted; provided, however,
that the Committee may adopt any other criterion for the determination of such
fair market value as it may determine to be appropriate. The purchase price is
to be paid in full upon the exercise of the option, either (i) in cash, (ii) in
the discretion of the Committee, by the tender to the Company of shares of the
Common Stock of the Company, owned by the optionee and registered in his name,
having a fair market value equal to the cash exercise price of the option being
exercised, with the fair market value of such stock to be determined in such
appropriate manner as may be provided for by the Committee or as may be required
in order to comply with, or to conform to the requirements of, any applicable
laws or regulations, or (iii) in the discretion of the Committee, by any
combination of the payment methods specified in clauses (i) and (ii) hereof;
provided that, no shares of Common Stock may be tendered in exercise of an
Incentive Stock Option if such shares were acquired by the optionee through the
exercise of an Incentive Stock Option unless (i) such shares have been held by
the optionee for at least one year and (ii) at least two years have elapsed
since such prior Incentive Stock Option was granted. In addition, in the
discretion of the Committee, the optionee may effect a "cashless exercise" of an
option in lieu of paying the option price in cash or shares of Common Stock of
the Company owned by the optionee, by surrendering the option for that number of
shares of Common Stock determined by multiplying the number of option shares to
which he would otherwise be entitled by a fraction, the numerator of which is
the excess of the then-current fair market value per share of the Common Stock
over the exercise price, and the denominator of which is the then-current fair
market value per share of Common Stock. The proceeds of sale of stock subject to
option are to be added to the general funds of the Company or to the shares of
the Common Stock of the Company held in its Treasury, and used for its corporate
purposes as the Board of Directors shall determine.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15944]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NM-930-1310-01; NMNM 60584]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease; 
New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provision of Public Law 97-451; a petition for 
reinstatement of Oil and Gas Lease NMNM 60584, Lea County, New Mexico, 
was timely filed and was accompanied by all required rentals and 
royalties accruing from April 1, 1996, the date of termination. No 
valid lease has been issued affecting the land. The lessee has agreed 
to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5.00 per 
acre, or fraction thereof, and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. Payment 
of a $500.00 administration fee has been made. Having met all the 
requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set in Section 31(d) and 
(e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 188(d) 
and (e)), the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the 
lease effective April 1, 1996, subject to the original terms and 
conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates 
cited above, and the reimbursement for cost of publication of this 
Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Becky C. Olivas, BLM, New Mexico State Office, (505) 438-7609.

    Dated: June 13, 1996.
Becky C. Olivas,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 96-15944 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 5, 2014      /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Sandra L. MUEGLER, f/k/a Sandra L. Payne, Petitioner/Appellant, v. James Edward PAYNE, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 63466.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Frank Joseph Niesen, Jr., St. Louis, Arthur G. Muegler, Jr., Clayton, for petitioner, appellant.

Lawrence G. Gillespie, Eisen, Gillespie, & Hilton, Webster Groves, for respondent, respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner wife appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in an action to distribute separate property and divide marital property after the parties’ marriage was dissolved in Arizona. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
|Exhibit 24.2
|------------

SECRETARYS CERTIFICATE

I, Charles A.
Brawley, III, Assistant Secretary of PMA Capital Corporation, a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
hereby certify that the following resolutions were adopted at the February 7,
2001 meeting of the Board of Directors:

RESOLVED, that
the Officers of the Corporation, and each of them, are hereby authorized to sign
the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2000, and any amendments thereto, (the Form 10-K) in the name
and on behalf of the Corporation and as attorneys for each of its Directors and
Officers.

RESOLVED, that
each Officer and Director of the Corporation who may be required to execute
(whether on behalf of the Corporation or as an Officer or Director thereof) the
Form 10-K, is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a power of attorney
appointing such person or persons named therein as true and lawful attorneys and
agents to execute in the name, place and stead (in any such capacity) of any
such Officer or Director the Form 10-K and to file any such power of attorney
together with the Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Corporation,
this 13th day of March, 2001.

| | /s/ Charles A. Brawley, IIIAssistant Secretary
| | ----------------------------------------------

(SEAL)

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OFGREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (the ‘‘Issuer’’).

I, Tim Courtis, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                               |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (i)  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |

|  |            |                                                                                                                                                        |
|--|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii)  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |

|                                  |  |  |                 |
|----------------------------------|--|--|-----------------|
| Dated: August 13, 2007 |  |  | /s/ Tim Courtis |
|                             |  |  | Tim Courtis     |

----
#### In the Interest of D.P.C. and K.M. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. Y.W., Appellant.

No. WD 48821.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 11, 1994. .

Timothy C. Brady, Fulton, for appellant.

Elizabeth K. Magee, Columbia, for respondent.

James C. Dowling, Fulton, guardian ad litem.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Y.W. appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights pursuant to § 211.447, RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (the ‘‘Issuer’’).

I, Leonard Goldberg, the Principal Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                              
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

| |      |                                                                                                                                                       
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: May 12, 2008





/s/ Leonard GoldbergLeonard Goldberg


---
EX-10.(R)





Exhibit (10)(r)


Amendment


to the

Defined Contribution 
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

(Amended and Restated as of December 1, 2007)



Whereas, CMS Energy Corporation maintains the Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the “Plan”); and



Whereas, the Board of Directors of CMS Energy Corporation has authorized Officers of the Company
to modify the Plan to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 409A) and
as advisable to reflect guidance under Section 409A; and



Whereas, under the applicable Section 409A regulations the Plan may either accept the default
standard for determining when a Separation from Service has occurred or it may adopt a standard
of up to 49% of the average level of services performed over the prior 36 month period of time;
and



Whereas, legal counsel, human resources and the tax department recommend adoption of a 45%
standard to provide a reasonable basis for complying with the Section 409A requirement.



Now Therefore, The definition of Separation from Service in Section I of the Plan is amended
effective to read as follows:




	 	 	 
	“Separation from
Service”

	 	Means the Employee retires or otherwise has a separation from service
from the company as defined under Code Section 409A and any applicable
regulations. The Plan Administrator will determine, consistent with
the requirements of Code Section 409A and any applicable regulations,
to what extent a person on a leave of absence, including on paid sick
leave pursuant to Company policy, has incurred a Separation from
Service. Notwithstanding the above, a Separation from Service will
occur consistent with the requirements of Code Section 409A when it is
reasonably anticipated that the future level of bona fide services
provided by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an independent
contractor) will be no more than 45% of the average level of bona fide
services performed by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an
independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36 month period
(or the full period of services, if less than 36 months).





1








 





	 	 	 
	Signed this 21 day of December, 2008.
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	CMS Energy Corporation:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ John M. Butler
 

John M. Butler

	 	 
	Senior Vice President — Human Resources and Administrative Services
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Attest:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Catherine M. Reynolds
 

Catherine M. Reynolds

	 	 
	Vice President and Secretary
	 	 







2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 939 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 939

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 2, 2009.
Whereas, on the morning of November 29, 2009, 4 members of the Lakewood Police 
        Department were slain by gunfire in a senseless act of violence while 
        preparing for their shift in Lakewood, Washington;
Whereas the 4 officers have been members of the Lakewood Police Department since 
        its founding 5 years ago, were valuable members of the community, and 
        were deeply respected for their service;
Whereas Sergeant Mark Renninger who served 13 years in law enforcement, first 
        with the Tukwila Police Department and most recently, served with the 
        Lakewood Police Department, is survived by his wife and 3 children;
Whereas Officer Tina Griswold who served 14 years in law enforcement, first with 
        the Lacey Police Department and most recently, served with the Lakewood 
        Police Department, is survived by her husband and 2 children;
Whereas Officer Ronald Owens who served 12 years in law enforcement, first with 
        the Washington State Patrol and most recently, served with the Lakewood 
        Police Department, is survived by his daughter;
Whereas Officer Greg Richards who served 8 years in law enforcement, first with 
        the Kent Police Department and most recently, served with the Lakewood 
        Police Department, is survived by his wife and 3 children;
Whereas the senseless violence against and murder of law enforcement officers, 
        who are sworn to serve, protect, and preserve the peace of the 
        communities, is a particularly heinous crime; and
Whereas in the face of this senseless tragedy, the people of the City of 
        Lakewood, the surrounding communities, and the State of Washington have 
        come together in support of the law enforcement community and the 
        victims' families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) extends its condolences to the families of Sergeant Mark 
        Renninger, Officer Tina Griswold, Officer Ronald Owens, and Officer Greg 
        Richards; and
            (2) stands with the people of Lakewood, Washington, the men and 
        women of the Lakewood Police Department, and members of the law 
        enforcement community as they celebrate the lives and mourn the loss of 
        these four dedicated public servants and law enforcement heroes.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0342 

_____________________________

STORM ROYAL THAYER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

September 25, 2024

PER CURIAM.

Storm Royal Thayer appeals his life sentence for seconddegree murder, raising two issues. As to his challenge to the 

sentencing court’s refusal to impose a departure sentence, we 

dismiss this portion of his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Wilson 

v. State, 306 So. 3d 1267, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that 

appellate review of the trial court’s denial of a downward 

departure sentence is only appropriate when the trial court 

“misapprehends its discretion to depart or refuses to exercise that 

discretion as a matter of policy”), rev. granted, No. SC20-1870, 

2021 WL 1157838 (Fla. Mar. 26, 2021), and Parrish v. State, 349 

So. 3d 485 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022), rev. granted, No. SC-2022-1457, 

2023 WL 5223320 (Fla. Aug. 15, 2023). We otherwise affirm 

without further comment. 
2

DISMISSED in part; AFFIRMED in part.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Lynne Long,

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris Esperanza 

Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-10-00461- CV

Michael C. Bianco d/b /a P rem ier CustomHom e Build ers and MDJB Construct ion, In c. d/b/a Pre m ier CustomHom e Build ers, A ppellan ts
v. Jam es Hine and Sand ra Hine, Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F CO MAL CO UNTY, 274 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. C-2 010- 0201 C, H ONO RAB LE JACK H . RO B ISO N, JUDGE P RESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants Michae l C. Bia nco d/b/a Premier C u stom Home Builder s and MDJ B Construction, Inc. d/b/a Premier C u s t o m Home Builder s have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appea l, explaining that they have settled thei r d i s pute with appellee s J ames Hine and Sandra H ine. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l.

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: Apr il 25, 2013