alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JOHN LEE TAYLOR,

Appellant,

v.

SEKETA CULVER,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4444

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Hugh A. Carithers, Judge.

Angela C. Flowers of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Ocala, for Appellant.

Jessie L. Harrell of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

SWANSON, J.

In this personal injury action arising from a low-impact automobile collision,

Appellant first asserts the trial court erred in excluding the testimony of his expert 

biomedical engineer where the testimony was relevant to material issues of fact 

and to refute the testimony of Appellee’s own biomedical engineering expert. 

Secondly, Appellant argues a new trial is required due to improper argument 
2

during opening and closing arguments. We conclude the trial court abused its 

discretion in excluding the testimony of Appellant’s expert witness in biomedical 

engineering. See Council v. State, 98 So. 3d 115, 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). This 

determination obviates the need to address Point II. 

A trial court’s decision to admit or exclude expert testimony is reviewed 

under an abuse of discretion standard. Angrand v. Key, 657 So. 2d 1146, 1148 

(Fla. 1995). The boundaries of a trial court’s discretion to admit or exclude 

evidence are confined by Florida’s evidence code and controlling case law. 

Council, 98 So. 3d at 117. A fundamental cornerstone for analysis is that all 

relevant evidence is admissible, except as provided by law. § 90.402, Fla. Stat. 

(2014). While relevant evidence may be inadmissible where its probative value is 

outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, see section 90.403, Florida Statutes

(2014), where relevant evidence is not unfairly prejudicial the trial court has no 

discretion or authority to exclude it. Special v. W. Boca Med. Ctr., 160 So. 3d 

1251, 1259 (Fla. 2014). 

In this instance, our decision in Council provided controlling Florida case 

law to support the conclusion that the proffered testimony of Appellant’s

biomechanics expert was relevant to the disputed issues concerning velocity and 

the directionality of forces involved in the accident, and thus, to the issue of

causation. The trial court in this case was aware of this binding precedent but 
3

inexplicably elected to discount and discard its authority. This was a clear abuse of 

discretion.

Accordingly, the final judgment entered in favor of Appellee is reversed and 

the cause of action is remanded for a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED. 

MAKAR and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 708 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 708

  Congratulating Nancy Goodman Brinker for receiving the Presidential 
                           Medal of Freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2009

  Mr. Schock (for himself and Ms. Schakowsky) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating Nancy Goodman Brinker for receiving the Presidential 
                           Medal of Freedom.

Whereas Ambassador Brinker is the founder of the Susan G. Komen Race for the 
        Cure, the world's leading breast cancer grass roots organization, and 
        Ambassador Brinker established the organization in memory of her sister, 
        who passed away from cancer in 1980;
Whereas through innovative events like Race for the Cure, the organization has 
        given and invested over $1.3 billion for research, health services and 
        education services since its founding in 1982;
Whereas the Race for Cure has developed a worldwide grassroots network of breast 
        cancer survivors and activists who are working together to save lives, 
        empower people, ensure quality care for all and energize science to find 
        cures;
Whereas Ambassador Brinker has served as Chair of the President's Cancer Panel 
        (1990);
Whereas Ambassador Brinker has served as United States Ambassador to Hungary 
        (2001-2003);
Whereas Ambassador Brinker has served as Chief of Protocol of the United States 
        (2007-2009);
Whereas, in May of this year, Ambassador Brinker was named the first-ever World 
        Health Organization's Goodwill Ambassador for Cancer Control;
Whereas, on July 30, 2009, President Obama named Peoria native Ambassador Nancy 
        Goodman Brinker as a recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom;
Whereas the Presidential Medal of Freedom is America's highest civilian honor 
        that is awarded to individuals who make an especially meritorious 
        contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, 
        world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors;
Whereas Ambassador Brinker's public service has impacted millions of lives and 
        her work, from promoting cancer research to promoting freedom around the 
        world, and has been praised by members of both parties; and
Whereas President Obama will present Illinois native Ambassador Nancy Goodman 
        Brinker with the Presidential Medal of Freedom on Wednesday, August 12, 
        2009: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Nancy 
Goodman Brinker for receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

House Calendar No. 151 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 978 

[Report No. 111–402] 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives all 

documents in the possession of the President relating to the inventory 

and review of intelligence related to the shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, 

described by the President in a memorandum dated November 10, 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. HOEKSTRA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

JANUARY 27, 2010 

Reported adversely from the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 

referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives all documents in the possession of the President relating to the inventory and review of intelligence 

related to the shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, described 

by the President in a memorandum dated November 

10, 2009. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit 

2 to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 978 RH 

1 after the adoption of this resolution all documents (includ2 ing records, memos, correspondence, or other communica3 tions) in the possession of the President that refer or re4 late to the inventory and review of intelligence related to 

5 the shooting on November 5, 2009, at Fort Hood, Texas, 

6 described by the President in a memorandum dated No7 vember 10, 2009. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 151 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 978 

[Report No. 111–402] 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House 

in a memorandum dated November 10, 2009. at Fort Hood, Texas, described by the President and review of intelligence related to the shooting sion of the President relating to the inventory of Representatives all documents in the possesJANUARY 27, 2010 

Reported adversely from the Permanent Select Comand ordered to be printed mittee on Intelligence, referred to the House Calendar, 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SAINT LOUIS COUNTY, Defendant/Appellant, v. John BORSA, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 69806.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 30, 1996.

Laurence D. Mass, Eli Karsh, Clayton, for appellant.

Raymond W. Gruender, Coburn & Croft, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Special School District of Saint Louis County (SSD), appeals the granting of summary judgment in favor of John Borsa, respondent, in an action for breach of an employment contract. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15494]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Docket No. C-3224]


Supermarket Development Corporation, et. al.; Prohibited Trade 
Practices and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Modifying order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order reopens a 1988 consent order that settled 
allegations that the acquisition of the El Paso Division of Safeway 
Stores, Inc., by Supermarket Development Corporation and Furr's, Inc. 
would reduce supermarket competition in 12 towns in New Mexico and 
western Texas, and required prior Commission approval, for ten years, 
before acquiring supermarket assets. This order modifies the consent 
order by substituting for the prior-approval requirement a provision 
requiring Furr's Supermarket to notify the Commission at least 30 days 
before acquiring certain supermarkets in those areas.

DATES: Consent order issued March 17, 1988. Modifying order issued 
September 5, 1995.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Modifying Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th Street and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Piotrowski, FTC/S-2115, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-2623.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Matter of Supermarket Development 
Corporation, et al. The prohibited trade practices and/or corrective 
actions as set forth at 53 FR 11247, are changed, in part, as indicated 
in the summary.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15494 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
<PAGE>

                                     EXHIBIT 21

                        LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION/
                     NAME                                ORGANIZATION
                     ----                                ------------
 <S>                                               <C>
 KSL Desert Resorts, Inc.                                  Delaware
 KSL Resorts Group, Inc.                                   Delaware
 Casitas Plaza Corporation                                 Delaware
 KSL Travel, Inc.                                          Delaware
 KSL Real Estate Company                                   Delaware
 Las Casitas Corporation                                   Delaware

 KSL Golf Holdings, Inc.                                   Delaware
 KSL Fairways Golf Corporation                             Delaware
 The Fairways Group, L.P.                                  Delaware
 Mequon Country Club, Inc.                                Wisconsin
 MVGC Corp.                                              Pennsylvania
 Monroe Valley Associates, L.P.                          Pennsylvania
 Liberty Golf Park, Inc.                                   Maryland
 KSL Fairways/Virginia Corporation                         Delaware
 KSL Fairways/Gauntlet, L.P.                               Delaware

 KSL Grand Traverse Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
 KSL Grand Traverse Land, Inc.                             Delaware
 KSL Grand Traverse Realty, Inc.                           Delaware
 KSL Grand Traverse Resort, Inc.                           Delaware
 KSL Water Works, Inc.                                     Delaware

 KSL Georgia Holdings, Inc.                                Delaware
 KSL Lake Lanier, Inc.                                     Delaware

 KSL Florida Holdings, Inc.                                Delaware
 KSL Hotel Corp.                                           Delaware
 KSL Silver Properties, Inc.                               Delaware
 KSL Florida Development Corporation                       Delaware

 KSL Claremont Resort, Inc.                                Delaware
</TABLE>
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: November 7, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets, Daniel Boyle

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg

(telephonically), and Gopi Panchapakesan, Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, 

CJA for Defendant Padilla, present; Joy M. Bertrand (zoom), CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 29):

9:11 a.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion held with counsel. 9:37 a.m. Recess. 

9:42 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Jury is informed by the Court that their jury service will be 

extended through November 17, 2023. Order to follow. Jury instructed re: deliberations. Jurors 12 and 

2 are randomly drawn as alternates. 9:53 a.m. Jury of 12 retires to begin deliberations. The Court having 

immediately learned that Juror 16 is unwell, Juror 16 is deemed an alternate. Juror 2 is randomly drawn 

as a replacement deliberating juror. 9:59 a.m. Recess. 

10:25 a.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion held with counsel. As to the forfeiture portion of the trial, the 

Court will limit each side to 2 hours for direct examination, no limit on cross-examination and 30 

minutes for any redirect. IT IS ORDERED the parties shall file briefing within 24 hours related to the 

money forfeiture and Defendants’ specific interest as discussed on the record. 10:39 a.m. Recess.

(10:20 a.m. Jury in recess prior to deliberations. 10:40 a.m. Jury begins deliberations. 11:41 a.m. 

Recess. 12:34 p.m. Jury resumes deliberations. 2:23 p.m. Recess. 2:45 p.m. Jury resumes deliberations. 

4:26 p.m. Jury in recess and will reconvene on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.)

Court Reporter Hilda Lopez

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 9:11 AM

Stop: 10:39 AM

Total: 57 min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1944 Filed 11/07/23 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer March 6, 2009
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer February 13, 2009
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**     I, Robert D. Scherich, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Horsehead Holding Corp.,certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Horsehead Holding Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007     /s/ Robert D. Scherich     **Robert D. Scherich**  **Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**
31
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, F. Stephen Miller, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of SouthEast Bancshares, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;     (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 11, 2007             /s/ F. Stephen Miller   F. Stephen Miller,  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)