alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2882-2884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1534]




[[Page 2881]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV





Office of Management and Budget





_______________________________________________________________________



Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 1996 / 
Notices

[[Page 2882]]


OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals

January 1, 1996.
    This report is submitted in fulfillment of the requirement of 
Section 1014(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act 
of 1974 (Public Law 93-344). Section 1014(e) requires a monthly report 
listing all budget authority for the current fiscal year for which, as 
of the first day of the month, a special message had been transmitted 
to Congress.
    This report gives the status, as of January 1, 1996, of three 
deferrals contained in one special message for FY 1996. This message 
was transmitted to Congress on October 19, 1995.

Rescissions

    As of January 1, 1996, no rescission proposals were pending before 
the Congress.

Deferrals (Attachments A and B)

    As of January 1, 1996, Sec. 113.2 million in budget authority was 
being deferred from obligation. Attachment B shows the status of each 
deferral reported during FY 1996.

Information From Special Message

    The special message containing information on the deferrals that 
are covered by this cumulative report is printed in the Federal 
Register cited below:

60 FR 55154, Friday, October 27, 1995
Alice M. Rivlin,
Director.

BILLING CODE 3110-01-M

[[Page 2883]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMMITTED] TN29JA96.000



[[Page 2884]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMMITTED] TN29JA96.001



[FR Doc. 96-1534 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 837 

Recognizing Kentucky Wesleyan College for over 150 years of service as 

an institution of higher education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2009 

Mr. GUTHRIE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Kentucky Wesleyan College for over 150 years 

of service as an institution of higher education. 

Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College was founded in 1858; 

Whereas the first commencement held at Kentucky Wesleyan 

College was in 1868; 

Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College is a private, liberal arts 

Methodist college located in Owensboro, Kentucky; 

Whereas 956 students from 27 States and 6 foreign countries 

were enrolled at Kentucky Wesleyan College in the fall of 

2008; 

Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College’s mission statement is 

to foster a liberal arts education that nourishes, stimulates, and prepares future leaders intellectually, spiritually, and physically to achieve success in life; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 837 IH 

Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College has a number of notable 

alumni, including a United States Supreme Court justice, 

a Major League Baseball pitcher, and the founder of another Kentucky institution of higher education; 

Whereas the Kentucky Wesleyan Panthers compete in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II athletics; 

and 

Whereas from overseas mission trips to numerous local 

projects, Kentucky Wesleyan students meet the needs of 

others and positively impact the world around them: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Kentucky Wesleyan College for 

3 over 150 years of service as an institution of higher 

4 education; and 

5 (2) thanks Kentucky Wesleyan College for the 

6 valuable education it has provided to students. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit A Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate or Modify 

Seizure Warrants

Exhibit B Declarations Filed in Support of the Motion to Vacate 

or Modify Seizure Warrants

Exhibit C Request for Judicial Notice (without exhibits)

Exhibit D Notice of Related Cases

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 286 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Mingchun Zhou, the Chief Executive Officer of China Skyrise Digital
Service Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of
August, 2010.

/s/ Mingchun ZhouMingchun
ZhouChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and will be retained by China Skyrise Digital
Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

---
#### Ashok K. CHAUHAN and Kunstoplast of America, Inc., Appellants, v. FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP., U.S.A., Appellee.

No. 14-96-00359-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

May 23, 1996.

Matthew L. Benson, Roger Reed Evans, Houston, for appellants.

Mark F. Elvig, Scott J. Davenport, Ryan & Sudan, LLP, Houston, for appellee.

Before LEE, HUDSON and EDELMAN, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee for damages. After the trial court signed the judgment on November 30, 1995, appellants filed separate motions for new trial. On February 27,1996, Mr. Justin Seth, vice president of Kunsto-plast of America, Inc. (Eunstoplast), who is not a licensed attorney,1 filed cash deposits in lieu of cost bond on behalf of both appellants. The transcript was filed in this court on March 18, 1996. On April 17, 1996, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and order the appeal dismissed.

Corporations may be represented only by a licensed attorney. This court has held that if a corporation chooses to represent itself through a non-attorney officer, it does so at its own risk. *Dell Dev. Corp. v. Best Indus. Uniform, Supply Co.,*743 S.W.2d 302, 302 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, writ denied). A notice of appeal filed by an officer who is not a licensed attorney on behalf of a corporation is not effective to perfect an appeal. *Globe Leasing, Inc. v. Engine Supply & Mach. Serv.,*437 S.W.2d 43, 45 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1969, no writ); *see also R.T.A. Intern, Inc. v. Cano,*915 S.W.2d 149, 151 (Tex.App. —Corpus Christi 1996, no writ). We, therefore, have no jurisdiction over Kunstoplast’s appeal and order it dismissed.

Appellant Ashok K. Chauhan, an Indian national currently residing in New Delhi, India, is the chairman, chief executive officer, and majority shareholder of the AKC Group (Kunstoplast’s parent company), and president and a director of Eunstoplast. Mr. *583Chauhan can perfect an appeal pro se or through an attorney. *See*TexR.Civ.P. 7. Mr. Chauhan did not perfect his appeal pro se. The rules do not permit an unlicensed attorney to perfect an appeal on behalf of an individual and the law does not countenance the unauthorized practice of law. *See*Tex Gov’t Code Ann. § 81.101 (Vernon 1988). Courts have the inherent power to determine what is the practice of law on a case-by-case basis, unconfined by statute. *Unauthorized Practice Committee, State Bar of Texas v. Cortez,*692 S.W.2d 47, 51 (Tex.1985), *cert. denied,*474 U.S. 980, 106 S.Ct. 384, 88 L.Ed.2d 387 (1985). We hold that perfecting an appeal and giving notice of the perfection on behalf of an individual may only be properly accomplished by a licensed attorney. We thus order the appeal dismissed.

1

. Appellee’s verified motion stated that Mr. Seth was not an attorney and appellants have not asserted that he is in their response to the motion to dismiss.
#### Stephenson et al. *v.*McCurdy.

(No. 22633

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*Mr. E. E. Eubanks*and *Mr. Joseph McGhee,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Miss Mary G. McMahon*and *Miss Goldie 8. Ranter,*fpr defendant in error.

By the Court.

The paramount question in this case is whether or not testimony given before a *118grand jury is privileged and inadmissible in evidence to sustain an action for malicious prosecution.

Defendant in error relies upon the case of *Kintz*v. *Harriger,*99 Ohio St., 240, 124 N. E., 168, 12 A. L. R., 1240. That case related to testimony given before a grand jury in the state court. In the present case, the testimony relied upon was given before a federal grand jury. In the case of *Vogel, Exr.,*v. *Gruaz, 110*U. S., 311, 4 S. Ct., 12, 28 L. Ed., 158, testimony "of this character is held to be privileged; and in the case of the *Taplin-Rice-Clerkin Co.*v. *Hower, post,*123, 177 N. E., 203, this day decided in this court, the case of *Kints*v. *Harriger*is overruled and the rule of *Vogel, Exr.,*v. *Gruaz, supra,*adopted.

It follows that the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be reversed and the judgment of the court of common pleas affirmed.

*Judgment reversed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
#### Dorothea Maria BLAND, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Nos. 57361, 57443.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 5, 1990.

Judith C. LaRose, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
|   | i.  | The      Annual Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended March 31,      2010  (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and  |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ii. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                           |

| Date:  | August      31, 2010                                                                        |   | By: | /s/      MARK NOFFKE |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----|----------------------|
|   | Name:  Mark      NoffkeTitle:    Chief      Financial Officer |

----
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1746 Filed 09/01/23 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tommy E. REED, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 66217.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 28, 1995.

Frank A. Anzalone, Clayton, for appellant.

Andrea Harbin, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Louis County, Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by the court of the class A misdemeanor of harassment, § 565.090 RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Order entered November 25, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00626-CV

NEW 99 ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant

V.

MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07389

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 23, 2020 unopposed fourth motion 

for an extension of time to file its brief on the merits. Appellant requests a fourday extension of time. We GRANT the motion and extend the time November 

30, 2020. We caution appellant that failure to file its brief by November 30th may 

result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution without further notice. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 922 

Directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit to the House 

of Representatives all information in the possession of the Department 

of Homeland Security relating to the Department’s planning, information 

sharing, and coordination with any state or locality receiving detainees 

held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on or after January 

20, 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2009 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. 

DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. 

MCCAUL, Mr. DENT, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. OLSON, Mr. CAO, and Mr. AUSTRIA) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit 

to the House of Representatives all information in the 

possession of the Department of Homeland Security relating to the Department’s planning, information sharing, and coordination with any state or locality receiving 

detainees held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 

on or after January 20, 2009. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs 

2 the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit to the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 922 IH 

1 House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the 

2 date of adoption of this resolution, copies of any portions 

3 of all documents, records, memoranda, correspondence, 

4 and communications in the possession of the Department 

5 of Homeland Security, including all component agencies, 

6 regarding the Department’s planning, information shar7 ing, and coordination with any State or locality in the 

8 United States, including New York City, that has received 

9 or will receive detainees held at Naval Station, Guanta10 namo Bay, Cuba on or after January 20, 2009. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Dan Hyer, Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-005-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the United States’ Motion to Continue Sentencing, there 

being no objection, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion to Continue Sentencing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the Sentencing from February 27, 2023, 

to ___________________________________ at ________________________.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1518-1 Filed 12/29/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT  32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Lightlake Therapeutics
Inc.  (the"Company")  for  the  year  ended  July  31,  2008,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Roger
Crystal,  as  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


Date:  3/15/10                          By:  /s/ Dr. Roger Crystal
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Dr. Roger Crystal
                                             Chief Executive  Officer

This  certification  accompanies  each  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shalL not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 98

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a vote 
             each year on whether to increase Members' pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2009

Mr. Barrett of South Carolina submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a vote 
             each year on whether to increase Members' pay.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``11. (a) During consideration in the Committee of the Whole of a 
bill making appropriations for the Department of the Treasury for any 
fiscal year, before consideration of any other amendment, it shall be 
in order to consider an amendment only proposing to bar the automatic 
annual cost-of-living pay adjustment of Members of Congress that would 
otherwise take effect in such fiscal year. Such amendment shall be 
considered as read, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be 
subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendment are 
waived.
    ``(b) During consideration of a bill, conference report, or 
amendment between the two Houses making or continuing appropriations to 
the end of a fiscal year that includes appropriations for the 
Department of the Treasury for that fiscal year, it shall not be in 
order to consider such measure unless (1) the measure includes a 
provision to bar the automatic annual cost-of-living pay adjustment of 
Members of Congress that would otherwise take effect in such fiscal 
year or (2) the rule providing for its consideration allows a vote 
proposing to bar such automatic annual cost-of-living pay 
adjustment.''.
                                 <all>
```
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2014 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 1