alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15756]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31, 056]


Phillips Laser Magnetic Storage, Including Leased Workers of 
Accel Temporary Services, Colorado Springs, Colorado; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility To 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 19, 1995, applicable to 
all workers at Phillips Laser Magnetic Storage located in Colorado 
Springs, Colorado. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
August 9, 1995 (60 FR 40613).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Based on the new 
findings, the Department is amending the certification to include 
leased workers from Accel Temporary Services, Colorado Springs, 
Colorado. Phillips Laser Magnetic Storage, a CD ROM drive producer, 
contracted with Accel Temporary Services for workers.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Phillips Laser Magnetic Storage adversely affected by 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,056 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Phillips Laser Magnetic Storage, and workers 
from Accel Temporary Services contracted by Phillips Laser Magnetic 
Storage, Colorado Springs, Colorado, engaged in employment related 
to the production of CD ROM drives who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after May 8, 1994, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 7th day of June 1996.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-15756 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael P. BERRY, Defendant/Appellant. Michael P. BERRY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 62015, 63642.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

*861Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of three counts of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, two counts of pharmacy robbery first degree, § 569.025, RSMo Supp.1993, and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to seven concurrent life sentences. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 726 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 726

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 10, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 965) to amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative 
Act of 1998 to provide for the continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay 
Gateways and Watertrails Network.   All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI.   The 
bill shall be considered as read.   All points of order against provisions in 
the bill are waived.   The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill, and any amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; (2) the amendment 
in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Bishop of Utah or his 
designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as 
read, and shall be separately debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 12

                   KSL RECREATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               (in thousands, except ratios)
                                                                                  YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,

                                                             2000           1999           1998           1997           1996
                                                             ----           ----           ----           ----           ----
<S>                                                        <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings:
   Income (loss) before income taxes and
   extraordinary item.................................     $   27,129     $   40,950    $     7,117     $    2,944     $  (12,461)
Add:
   Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs...         50,464         51,779         35,652         31,709         28,769
   Minority interests in losses of subsidiary.........              -            118            129            143             58
                                                           ----------     ----------    -----------    -----------     ----------

Total Earnings........................................     $   77,593     $   92,847     $   42,898     $   34,796     $   16,366
                                                           ==========     ==========     ==========    ===========     ==========

Fixed charges:
   Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs...     $   50,464     $   51,779     $   35,652     $   31,709     $   28,769
   Capitalized interest...............................          1,691          1,619            754              0            577
                                                           ----------     ----------    -----------    -----------     ----------
Subtotal..............................................     $   52,155     $   53,398     $   36,406     $   31,709     $   29,346
                                                           ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)................            1.5x           1.7x           1.2x           1.1x             -
                                                           ==========     ==========     ==========    ===========     ==========
</TABLE>

(1) Earnings for fiscal 1996 were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $13.0
million.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15801]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[UT-080-06-1220-00]


Certain Public Lands in Uintah and Grand Counties, UT; Temporary 
Closure to Camping

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

ACTION: Temporary closure to camping on certain Public Lands in Uintah 
and Grand Counties, Utah, between August 5, 1996, and August 23, 1996, 
for dedication of the Book Cliff Wildlife Initiative. Action taken in 
accordance with 43 CFR Subpart 8364.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Certain Public Lands in the Vernal District, Uintah and Grand 
Counties, will be temporarily closed to overnight camping from 0600 
hours August 5, 1996, to 2400 hours August 23, 1996.
    Lands closed to camping are identified as the following: T. 15 S., 
R. 24 E., Sec. 36 SE\1/4\, SE\1/4\, and T. 15 S. R. 24 E., Sec. 32, 
S\1/2\ SE\1/4\ in Uintah County, Utah. T. 15\1/2\ S., R. 24 E., Sec. 
34, Lots 1 & 2; NW\1/4\ SE\1/4\; E\1/2\, SW\1/4\, SLB&M, in Grand 
County, Utah.
    The following persons operating within the scope of their official 
duties are exempt from the provision of this closure order: Bureau of 
Land Management employees; State of Utah employees, and other 
organizations or groups directly involved in the dedication of the Book 
Cliffs Wildlife Initiative.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Andrews, Assistant Field Office Manager for Renewable Resources, 
Vernal Field Office, 170 South 500 East, Vernal, Utah 84078. Business 
hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
legal holidays. Telephone (801) 781-4400 or 789-1362 or FAX (801) 781-
4410.

    Dated: June 13, 1996.
Paul M. Andrews,
Acting Vernal District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-15801 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1053 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1053

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to extend the 
                           termination date.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MUSEUM ACT.

    Section 4(f) of the National Law Enforcement Museum Act (Public Law 
106-492) is amended by striking ``10 years'' and inserting ``13 
years''.

            Passed the Senate May 7, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1053

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to extend the 
                           termination date.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14950]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

ACTION: Renewal of the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory 
Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee 
(ETTAC) is renewed. The renewal of the ETTAC is in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.2, and 41 CFR parts 101-
5.10(1990), Federal Advisory Committee Management Rule.
    ETTAC was established May 31, 1994, to advise the Secretary of 
Commerce in his capacity as the Chairman of the Trade Promotion 
Coordinating Committee (TPCC), as well as other TPCC heads and 
officials on issues related to the export of environmental 
technologies.
    ETTAC functions as an advisory body in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. On October 22, 1994, the Congress passed the 
Jobs Through Trade Enhancement Act, 15 U.S.C. 4728 (c). This Act 
mandated the creation of such an advisory committee on the promotion of 
environmental technologies exports.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Environmental 
Technologies Exports, Trade Development, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, (202) 482-5225.

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
Anne L. Alonzo,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Technologies Exports.
[FR Doc. 96-14950 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
Order entered April 9, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00161-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.R.N., ET AL., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JC-17-00385-X

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant Father’s April 8, 2019 motion to extend time for filing brief. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER Father’s brief be filed no later than April 29, 2019. 

Because this is an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case, we caution Father that 

further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
#### Raymond D. COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Gary WALLACE, et al., Defendants/Respondents.

No. 68354.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied May 28, 1996.

M. Corinne Corley, Kansas City, for appellant.

Bruce H. Beckett, Andrew S. Flach and Julie E. Figg, Columbia, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*544*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Raymond D. Collins, appeals from the order of the trial court which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant, First National Bank & Trust Company1 in plaintiffs’.action alleging breach of contract, and tortious interference with contract by defendants in the attempted sale of the plaintiffs’ business to a non-defendant third party.

We have reviewed the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The plaintiffs brought this action also against Gary Wallace and Shelbina Mercantile Bank, alleging negligence, breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, and conversion. Summary judgment was also entered in favor of Shel-bina Mercantile Bank, but only the judgment entered in favor of First National Bank was designated as final for purposes of this appeal. *See*74.01(b).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Deerfield Resources, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul McDonald, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with    the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; andThe information contained in the    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition    and result of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 20 day of February, 2007.

 

***/s/ PaulMcDonald               ***

Chief Executive Officerand

Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 13, 2009 | By:  | /s/      Mark V. Noffke                                                                   |
|------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |      |        Mark V. Noffke Chief      Financial Officer (principal financialofficer) |

----
RUTILA, SEIBT 

&

NASH PLLC

6803 E. Main Street, Suite 1116

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Alexandra Mijares Nash (023364)

RUTILA, SEIBT & NASH, PLLC 

6803 E. Main Street, Suite 1116

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

Telephone: (480) 712-0035

Email: ali@rsnlawaz.com

Attorneys for Ernest Allen

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON 

BEHALF OF NON-PARTY 

GOVERNMENT WITNESS ERNEST 

ALLEN

Alexandra Mijares Nash of the law firm Rutila, Seibt and Nash, PLLC hereby enters 

her appearance in this matter on behalf of non-party government witness Ernest Allen. All 

future correspondence, court documents and discovery in reference to this case will be 

accepted at the following address:

Alexandra Mijares Nash

Rutila, Seibt & Nash, PLLC

6803 E. Main Street, Suite 1116

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

Telephone: (480) 447-7037

ali@rsnlawaz.com

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 14th day of July 2023.

RUTILA, SEIBT & NASH, PLLC

/s/Alexandra Mijares Nash

Alexandra Mijares Nash (023364)

6803 E. Main Street, Suite 1116

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

Attorneys for Ernest Allen

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1635 Filed 07/14/23 Page 1 of 2
2

RUTILA, SEIBT 

&

NASH PLLC

6803 E. Main Street, Suite 1116

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Certificate of Service

I certify that on this 14th day of July 2023, I electronically transmitted the foregoing 

document to the Office of the Clerk of the Court, using the CM/EFC System, for filing and 

for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/EFC registrants on record.

/s/ Alexandra Mijares Nash

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1635 Filed 07/14/23 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00110-CV

Mary MOCZYGEMBA,

Appellant

v.

Thomas J. MOCZYGEMBA and Harry Lee Moczygemba,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-10-0573-CVW

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on May 29, 2014. On June 30, 2014, appellant filed an 

unopposed second motion for extension of time and requested an additional two weeks to file 

appellant’s brief. The total extension is forty-one days. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief is due July 11, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

EDUARDO VAZQUEZ, DOC #T61892, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-2320 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 7, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### Industrial Commission of Ohio *v.*O’Malley.

(No. 22855

Decided November 25, 1931.)

*402
      *Mr. Gilbert Bettman,*attorney general, *Mr. R. R. Zurmehly*and *Mr. Arthur Krause,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John V. Walsh*and *Mr. Frank Morton,*for defendant in error.

Bv the Court.

The testimony is very brief. In the trial court, the defendant below offered no evidence, but rested upon its motion for a directed *403verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence. The only /evidence relating to the cause of O’Malley’s death is his own statement that he had high blood pressure, and that “the excitement of it all” was the cause of his illness. If O’Malley’s death was caused by excitement merely, it was not caused by any physical injury contributing to his death. Hence the trial court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant for a directed verdict. The judgments of the courts below will therefore be reversed; and proceeding to render the judgment which the Court of Appeals should have rendered, judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff in error.

*Judgment reversed and final judgment for plaintiff in error.*

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Marshall, C. J., not participating.
#### The Cincinnati Ry. Supply Co. *v.*Continental Casualty Co.

(No. 22722

Decided February 3, 1932.)

*Mr. William R. Walsh,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Orgill, Maschke <& Wickham*and *Mr. H. Frank Van Lili,*for defendant in error.

*670It appearing to the court that the defendant in the trial court below has paid into court the full amount of plaintiff’s claim therein, together with interest and costs, the matters in controversy herein have become a moot question, and by reason thereof the decision of the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county herein is hereby affirmed, and the petition of the plaintiff in error and the cross-petition of the defendant in error are hereby finally dismissed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
Molly C. Dwyer

Clerk of Court 

Office of the Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 

Post Office Box 193939

San Francisco, California 94119-3939

415-355-8000

November 19, 2020

No.: 20-73408

D.C. No.: 2:18-cr-00422-SMB

Short Title: Michael Lacey, et al v. USDC-AZP

Dear Petitioners/Counsel

A petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition has been received in the Clerk's 

Office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court 

of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. Always 

indicate this docket number when corresponding with this office about your case.

If the U.S. Court of Appeals docket fee has not yet been paid, please make 

immediate arrangements to do so. If you wish to apply for in forma pauperis status, 

you must file a motion for permission to proceed in forma pauperis with this court.

Pursuant to FRAP Rule 21(b), no answer to a petition for writ of mandamus and/or 

prohibition may be filed unless ordered by the Court. If such an order is issued, the 

answer shall be filed by the respondents within the time fixed by the Court.

Pursuant to Circuit Rule 21-2, an application for writ of mandamus and/or 

prohibition shall not bear the name of the district court judge concerned. Rather, 

the appropriate district court shall be named as respondent.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1103 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 1