alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E.Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC,the manager of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  November 14, 2007                     |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |                      |  |  |

 

----
#### Barbara GEORGE and Jennifer Lynn George, Paige Alexander George and Jeffrey Michael George By and Through Their Next Friend, Barbara George, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Leland SMITH, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 56422.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 5, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 3, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 13, 1990.

Robert J. Radice, St. Louis, for plaintiffs-appellants.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Gary L. Gardner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant-respondent.

Before HAMILTON, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and STEPHAN, JJ.

HAMILTON, Presiding Judge.

Appellants, Barbara George (hereinafter George), the widow of decedent Clifford George, and decedent’s minor children, appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Respondent, Leland Smith (hereinafter Smith), a probation and parole officer employed by the State of Missouri in the City of St. Louis. George filed a wrongful death action on behalf of herself and the children after her husband Clifford George, a Cincinnati police officer, was fatally shot while on duty by Melvin Moreland on April 15, 1987. At the time of the shooting, Smith was Moreland’s parole officer. Smith moved for and the trial court granted summary judgment. We affirm.

This action arises out of the same sequence of events as set forth in *Norton v. Smith,*782 S.W.2d 775 (Mo.App.E.D.1989). We hereby adopt the facts of that opinion.

This appeal, moreover, raises the same issue of law raised in the *Norton*case. por the reasons discussed in *Norton,*we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

CARL R. GAERTNER and STEPHAN, JJ. concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Barbara Ceretzke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northwest Chariots Incorporated (the “Registrant”);





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and





6. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: August 12, 2009








By:           /s/  Barbara Ceretzke





Barbara Ceretzke


Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

In connection with the annual report of Austral Pacific Energy
Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Bruce Nicholson McGregor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Bruce McGregor ____________________________

Name: Bruce Nicholson McGregor Title: Chief Financial
Officer June 28, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the quarterly report of White Dental Supply, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month periods ended September 30, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Nancy White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and I, Michael White, acting in the capacity as the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Nancy
White


Nancy
White


Chief
Executive Officer


November
6, 2008








/s/ Michael
White


Michael
White


Chief
Financial Officer


November
6, 2008
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the quarterly  report for Diamond Ranch Foods,  Ltd,
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,
Joseph Maggio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:


         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


DATE:     February 3, 2006



By:    /s/ Joseph Maggio
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
       Joseph Maggio, Chairman, CEO, and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of SDG&E Funding LLC (the "Company") certifies that:

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

March 29, 2006

/s/ Charles A. McMonagle

______________________

Charles A. McMonagle

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Henry Andrews, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 7, 2008  /s/ Henry Andrews Henry Andrews President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

In July 2015, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada entered 

a stipulated judgment against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiff for $1,084,667.42 (Doc. 

1 at 2-3). Plaintiff registered the judgment in this Court in February 2018 (Doc. 4). A writ 

was issued for the garnishment of Judgment-Debtor Michael Peek’s non-exempt earnings 

at Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc. (“Garnishee”) (Doc. 6). Garnishee filed an Answer 

(Doc. 9), and the Defendants/Judgement-Debtors, Michael Peek and Brenda Peek, filed a 

Motion to Quash (Doc. 10). 

The Honorable Eileen S. Willett, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report 

and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 20), recommending that the Court deny the 

Judgment-Debtors’ Motion (Doc. 10). The Judgment-Debtors filed an Objection (Doc. 

21), and the Plaintiff/Judgement-Creditor filed a Response to the Objection (Doc. 22). 

 The Court has undertaken an extensive review of the issues presented in the 

Objection (Doc. 21) and Response to the Objection (Doc. 22). Upon that review, the Court 

concludes that Magistrate Judge Willett’s recommendations are wholly supported. The 

Travelers Casualty and Surety 

Company of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael L Peek, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-18-00009-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Court thus adopts Judge Willett’s R&R and the underlying reasoning. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 20) is accepted and adopted by the Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Objection to the R&R (Doc. 21) 

is overruled. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Quash (Doc. 10) is denied. 

 Dated this 1st day of August, 2019. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan 

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 30, 2004



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Billy C. Duvall                     
|Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be
deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 384 

Recognizing the importance of increased awareness of sleep apnea, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2009 

Mr. BILIRAKIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of increased awareness of sleep 

apnea, and for other purposes. 

Whereas sleep apnea is a common condition that affects more 

than 12,000,000 Americans, according to the National 

Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health; 

Whereas there are several types of sleep apnea that cause 

people with this condition to repeatedly stop breathing 

throughout the night, often many times; 

Whereas sleep apnea is a chronic condition that disrupts 

sleep three or more nights each week, leading to excessive 

daytime sleepiness; 

Whereas sleep apnea becomes more common with age, and 1 

in 10 people over the age of 65 suffers from it; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 384 IH 

Whereas sleep apnea is more common in men than women, 

and more than half of the people with sleep apnea are 

overweight; 

Whereas sleep apnea can strike anyone, at any age, at any 

time, including children; 

Whereas untreated sleep apnea can lead to high blood pressure, heart attack, stroke, obesity, and diabetes; 

Whereas untreated sleep apnea can also increase the chance 

of having work-related or driving accidents and adversely 

impact the quality of life of those suffering from this condition in other ways; 

Whereas lifestyle changes, mouthpieces, surgery, and/or 

breathing devices can successfully treat sleep apnea in 

many people; and 

Whereas the lack of public awareness of this serious condition 

leads to many undiagnosed and untreated cases: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports raising public awareness of sleep 

3 apnea; and 

4 (2) encourages all Americans to educate them5 selves and others about the consequences of sleep 

6 apnea and its potential treatments. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000807 17-MAY-2018 09:13 AM
J-E03006-15

2016 PA Super 51

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

WANYA ROSSER,

Appellant No. 3258 EDA 2013

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence June 4, 2013

In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-46-CR-0008571-2010

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., BENDER, P.J.E., BOWES, J., PANELLA, J., 

SHOGAN, J., LAZARUS, J., OTT, J., STABILE, J., AND JENKINS, J.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY BOWES, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 26, 2016

I concur in the result reached by the distinguished majority. 

Preliminarily, I agree that Appellant waived his federal and state 

confrontation clause argument and that his weight of the evidence position is 

without merit. However, I cannot agree that Commonwealth v. Briggs, 

12 A.3d 291 (Pa. 2011), implicitly speaks to the merits of the waived 

constitutional issue in question. The Briggs Court, as recognized by the 

learned majority, nowhere mentioned the confrontation clause. Accordingly, 

Briggs is simply inapposite as to a confrontation clause analysis. I would 

refrain from addressing the merits of an important constitutional question 

based in part on a case that simply does not speak to the issue and await 

the proper case. 
J-E03006-15

- 2 -

By addressing an issue that is not properly preserved, the majority 

precludes any development of this argument under the ineffective assistance 

of counsel rubric that could be advanced in a PCRA petition. The underlying 

claim is one which at least two members of the current Pennsylvania 

Supreme Court consider to have potential merit.1 Indeed, part of the 

rationale used for upholding the trial court’s decision to prohibit the question 

at issue is that Appellant did not testify and counsel did not provide a 

foundation for the proposed cross-examination. Both of these matters could 

implicate counsel’s representation. Since I believe it is imprudent to address 

the merits of Appellant’s waived argument under the facts of this case, I 

concur in the result.2

____________________________________________

1

 The original panel majority in this matter consisted of Judges, now 

Justices, Christine Donohue and David Wecht.

2

 I note that the trial court erroneously concluded that Appellant’s question 

would elicit hearsay as the answer would not have been introduced to prove 

the truth of the matter asserted.
#### James DORING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48338.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 29, 1994.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

*667Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).