alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        No. 32.1
 Form
        10-QSB
 Signet
        International Holdings, Inc.
 File
        No.
        000-51185
 
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 as
        adopted Pursuant to Section 906
 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
 In
        connection with the amended Quarterly
        Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-QSB for
        the
        period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ernest W. Letiziano, Chief Executive
        Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
  1.
                Such
                    Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
                    30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                    or 15(d)
                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
                The
                    information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
                    for
                    the period ending September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all
                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                    of
                    Signet International Holdings,
                    Inc.
 Date: January
          31, 2007
  By:
            */s/ Ernest W. Letiziano*
 Ernest
            W.
            Letiziano
 Chief
            Executive Officer and
 Chief
            Financial Officer
  A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International
          Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
          or its
          staff upon request.
#### In re the Marriage of Clarence E. SIMINO, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Barbara J. SIMINO, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 56410.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

April 17, 1990.

David L. Colson, Farmington, for respondent/appellant.

David L. Mayhugh, Flat River, for petitioner/ respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
SDG&E Funding LLC (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



March 15, 2004
                                           /s/ James P. Trent
                                          ______________________
                                           James P. Trent
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Wilson Cheung



Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman

September 12, 2007
#### Andre Terrell FORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. [ AXX-XX-XXXXX ]-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

Feb. 4, 1993.

James M. Sims, Houston, for appellant.

Carol M. Cameron, Houston, for appellee.

Before J. CURTISS BROWN, C.J., and ELLIS and LEE, JJ.

OPINION

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

The appellant entered a plea of no contest to the offense of unlawful possession of a handgun. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for ninety days. In his sole point of error, the appellant argues his conviction must be reversed because the record does not show he knowingly and intelligently entered his plea. We affirm.

The record on appeal consists of the transcript alone. The transcript includes the written admonishments signed by the appellant and his attorney before the plea was entered. According to the signed admonishments, the appellant fully understood his rights, and knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right of trial by jury.

*777In addition, the transcript includes a judgment recital stating the defendant “knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right of trial by jury.” Since the record is otherwise silent, the judgment recital is presumed to be correct. *Breazeale v. State,*688 S.W.2d 446, 450 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (on motion for rehearing). Absent a statement of facts, there is nothing to rebut the presumption of regularity. When a recitation such as this is included in the judgment, the burden shifts to the appellant to prove the invalidity of the waiver. *Id.*at 451.

The appellant also argues the State had the burden of providing this court with the statement of facts. This argument is patently without merit. The appellant, or other party seeking review, is responsible for providing a record that is sufficient to show error. Tex.R.App.P. 50(d). It is the appellant’s duty to file a statement of facts with the appellate court. Tex.R.App.P. 53(k).

Since the admonishments and judgment recital both show the appellant knowingly and intelligently waived the right of trial by jury, we affirm the conviction.
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Edward J. Geletka, President and Chief Executive Officer and L. Joseph Stella,
III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Colonial
Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his capacity as an officer of
the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and that:

(1)      the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



Date:  May 11, 2006                               /S/ EDWARD J. GELETKA
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Edward J. Geletka,
                                                  President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer


Date:  May 11, 2006                               /S/ L. JOSEPH STELLA, III
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  L. Joseph Stella, III,
                                                  Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Colonial Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Colonial
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-38643), as amended, pertaining to the 1997 Equity Incentive
Plan of BEI Technologies, Inc., of our report dated October 28, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of BEI
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended September 27, 2003.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California
December 5, 2003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41351 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus EFRAIN CASTILLO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-97-CR-239-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Efrain Castillo-Rodriguez appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence after pleading guilty to reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to § 1326(a), simple reentry, but that he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a conviction for an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2). His argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , ___ U.S. ___, 1998 WL 126904, at *3, *8 (U.S. Mar. 24, 1998).No. 97-41351 - 2 - AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2189

ANTHONY E. HURLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

P.F.Z. PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; JACK KATZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-04-1545-WDQ)

Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 18, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony E. Hurley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth C. Honeywell, Jason

Thomas Sayers, VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Anthony E. Hurley appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his claim against Defendants and denying his subsequent

Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in this civil action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hurley v.

P.F.Z. Prop., Inc., No. CA-04-1545-WDQ (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004

& entered July 1, 2004; Aug. 3, 2004; Aug. 17, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           1,264,365
<SECURITIES>                                     3,470,471
<RECEIVABLES>                                      637,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (74,198)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,322,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,763,448
<PP&E>                                             195,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (29,201)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,850,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,151,988
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         8,655,339
<OTHER-SE>                                         155,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,850,893
<SALES>                                          3,362,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                            2,798,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,182,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (59,739)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,760,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,760,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 792 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 18, 2010. 

Whereas Robert Kelly Slater was born on February 11, 1972, 

in Cocoa Beach, Florida; 

Whereas Kelly Slater learned to surf in Cocoa Beach, Florida, with his brothers, Sean and Stephen; 

Whereas Kelly Slater was a perennial amateur champion in 

the 1980s, winning 6 Eastern Surfing Association titles 

and 4 national titles; 

Whereas, in 1992, at the age of 20, Kelly Slater was the 

youngest surfer to win the Association of Surfing Professionals World Championship; 

Whereas, between 1992 and 2008, Kelly Slater was a 6-time 

winner of the Billabong Pipeline Masters, a competition 

held annually for the 45 top-ranked surfers by the Association of Surfing Professionals at the Banzai Pipeline in 

Oahu, Hawaii; 

Whereas, between 1994 and 1998, Kelly Slater won 5 consecutive Association of Surfing Professionals titles; 

Whereas, in 1995 and 1998, Kelly Slater won the Triple 

Crown of Surfing, the Reef Hawaiian Pro at Haleiwa 

Ali’i Beach Park, the O’Neill World Cup of Surfing at 

Sunset Beach, and the Billabong Pipeline Masters at the 

Banzai Pipeline; 
2 

•HRES 792 EH 

Whereas Kelly Slater was inducted into the Surfers Hall of 

Fame in 2002; 

Whereas, in 2002, Kelly Slater won the Quicksilver in Memory of Eddie Aikau at Waimea Bay in Oahu, Hawaii, a 

competition that occurs only when waves reach a minimum height of 20 feet; 

Whereas Kelly Slater was the 1st surfer ever to be awarded 

2 perfect scores in the final heat of the Billabong Tahiti 

Pro Contest under the Association of Surfing Professionals 2-wave scoring system; 

Whereas Kelly Slater won an Association of Surfing Professionals World Title in 2005, 7 years after his previous 

win in 1998; 

Whereas, in 2007, Kelly Slater started the Kelly Slater Foundation to raise awareness and financial support for socially and environmentally conscious charities; 

Whereas, in 2008, at the age of 36, Kelly Slater was the oldest surfer to win an Association of Surfing Professionals 

World Championship; 

Whereas, in 2010, Kelly Slater won the Rip Curl Pro Bell 

Championship, making him a 4-time winner of this 49- 

year-old international surfing championship held in Australia; 

Whereas Kelly Slater has 39 World Championship Tour victories; 

Whereas Kelly Slater holds 9 Association of Surfing Professionals World Championships, a record number; and 

Whereas Kelly Slater is surfing’s all-time leader in career 

event wins: Now, therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 792 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

and honors Robert Kelly Slater for winning the 2010 Rip 

Curl Pro Bell Championship and for his other outstanding 

achievements in the world of surfing. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3753

___________ Sammy Sharp, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner * [UNPUBLISHED] of Social Security, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 13, 1998

Filed: May 19, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. On November 18, 1993, Sammy Sharp filed an application for supplementa l security income benefits and disability insurance bene fits under the Social Security Act. Sharp all eged disability due to diabetes, chronic dermatitis, and weak spells, with a n ons etdate of April 1, 1993. His application was denied initially and upo n reconsiderat

ion. Following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that Sharp was disabled as of March 1, 1995, but that he was not disabled prior to that date. After the Appeals Council denied Sharp’s request for review, the ALJ’s decisionThe Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for th e 1 Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2- became the final determination of the Commissioner. Sharp appealed th e Commissioner’s decision to the district court, seeking an earlier onset date. Th e 1 district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner.
After a careful revie w of the administrative record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Commissione r’s determination that Sharp was not disabled prior to March 1, 1995. Because an extended opinion would serve no precedential value, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court’s memoran dum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit No. 99.2

                        Annual Statement of Compliance
                            Heller Financial, Inc.


The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Heller Financial, Inc., as
Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1999,
among Heller Equipment Asset Receivables Trust 1999-1, as Issuer, Heller Funding
Corporation, as Trust Depositor, Heller Financial, Inc., as Servicer, and
Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby
certify that:

     1.   Capitalized terms used in this Annual Statement as to Compliance have
          their respective meanings set forth in the Sale and Servicing
          Agreement.
     2.   Heller Financial, Inc. is as of the date hereof the Servicer under the
          Sale and Servicing Agreement.
     3.   The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to execute and deliver
          this Annual Statement of Compliance.
     4.   This Statement is delivered pursuant to Section 9.05 of the Sale and
          Servicing Agreement.
     5.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended
          December 31, 1999 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing
          Agreement was made under the undersigned's supervision.
     6.   Based on such review, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the
          Servicer has performed or has caused to be performed in all material
          respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
          and no Servicer Default has occurred or is continuing.


In Witness Whereof, I have affixed my signature hereto this 31st day of
January 2000.


                                        By: /s/ Carol J. Radtke
                                            ----------------------------------
                                        Printed Name: Carol J. Radtke
                                        Title:        Assistant Vice President
IV 

House Calendar No. 69 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 532 

[Report No. 111–145] 

Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 

1256) to protect the public health by providing the Food and Drug 

Administration with certain authority to regulate tobacco products, to 

amend title 5, United States Code, to make certain modifications in 

the Thrift Savings Plan, the Civil Service Retirement System, and the 

Federal Employees’ Retirement System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2009 

Mr. POLIS of Colorado, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment 

to the bill (H.R. 1256) to protect the public health 

by providing the Food and Drug Administration with 

certain authority to regulate tobacco products, to amend 

title 5, United States Code, to make certain modifications in the Thrift Savings Plan, the Civil Service Retirement System, and the Federal Employees’ Retirement 

System, and for other purposes. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

HRES 532 RH 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 1256) to protect the public health by providing the 

4 Food and Drug Administration with certain authority to 

5 regulate tobacco products, to amend title 5, United States 

6 Code, to make certain modifications in the Thrift Savings 

7 Plan, the Civil Service Retirement System, and the Fed8 eral Employees’ Retirement System, and for other pur9 poses, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to con10 sider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

11 order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, 

12 a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Energy 

13 and Commerce or his designee that the House concur in 

14 the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment shall be 

15 considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one 

16 hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and rank17 ing minority member of the Committee on Energy and 

18 Commerce. The previous question shall be considered as 

19 ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening 

20 motion. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 69 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 532 

[Report No. 111–145] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the Senate 

System, and for other purposes. tem, and the Federal Employees’ Retirement Savings Plan, the Civil Service Retirement SysCode, to make certain modifications in the Thrift tobacco products, to amend title 5, United States Administration with certain authority to regulate public health by providing the Food and Drug amendment to the bill (H.R. 1256) to protect the 

JUNE 11, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS