alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Harold Forzley, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TransAct Energy Corp. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 6, 2008  /s/ Harold Forzley Harold Forzley Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
CORE/3505308.0002/141990568.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Carrie M. Francis (020453)

Stefan M. Palys (024752) 

Michael Vincent (029864)

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Tel: (602) 279-1600 

Fax: (602) 240-6925 

Email: carrie.francis@stinson.com

 stefan.palys@stinson.com

 michael.vincent@stinson.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeremy Thacker, No. 2:18-cv-00063-PHX-DJH

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF 

SERVICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC; Robert J. Donat, 

Individually and as Trustee of The 

Robert Donat Living Trust Dated April 

19, 2017; 

Defendants.

Defendants hereby give notice, pursuant to General Order 17-08, of service upon 

Plaintiff of Defendants’ Ninth Supplemental Disclosure Statement by e-mail on 

August 21, 2018. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 21st day of August, 2018. 

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP 

By: /s/ Michael Vincent 

Carrie M. Francis

Stefan M. Palys 

Michael Vincent

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Attorneys for Defendants
2 

CORE/3505308.0002/141990568.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on August 21, 2018, I caused the foregoing document to be 

filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF; and that ECF will send an enotice of the electronic filing to: 

Kraig J. Marton 

Jeffrey A. Silence 

Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 

3200 N. Central Avenue, 20th Fl 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

kjm@jaburgwilk.com 

jxs@jaburgwilk.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Timothy B. O’Connor 

Schneider & Onofry, PC 

365 East Coronado Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 

toconnor@soarizonalaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Donat 

/s/ C. Roundtree
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

Douglas Haig, 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

)

)

NO. 18-mj-00105-MHB

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING

*Expedited Consideration Requested*

Defendant, Douglas Haig, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully requests 

this Court continue the Status Hearing currently scheduled for February 15, 2018 at 11:00 am 

for thirty (30) days.

The Government is preparing Discovery in this matter. Undersigned counsel has been 

informed Discovery will be provided to the Defendant before the end of the week. Additional 

time will be needed in order to review the Discovery and consider the possibility of a 

pre-indictment resolution.

Undersigned counsel has contacted counsel for the Government, Ms. Cristina Silva, 

Esq., and she has no objections to this Motion.

ATTORNEYS FOR FREEDOM LAW FIRM

3185 S. Price Road

Chandler, Arizona 85248

Telephone: (480) 755-7110

Fax: (480) 857-0150

Marc J. Victor – SBN 016064

Marc@AttorneysForFreedom.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:18-mj-00105-MHB Document 9 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The Defendant is aware of the relief sought herein, is in full agreement with same, and 

waives time under 18 U.S.C. Section 3142 in order to reschedule this matter.

This Motion is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. The ends of justice 

served by granting this motion outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendant in 

a speedy Trial.

Undersigned counsel expect that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 

3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) may occur as a result of the motion or from an order 

based thereon.

THEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests this Court continue the Status Hearing 

currently scheduled for February 15, 2018 at 11:00 am for thirty (30) days.

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 13th day of February, 2018.

ATTORNEYS FOR FREEDOM LAW FIRM

By: Marc J. Victor 

Marc J. Victor

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:18-mj-00105-MHB Document 9 Filed 02/13/18 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 13, 2018, I filed the Original with the Clerk of the 

Court using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to 

the following CM/CEF registrants:

Kristin Brook, Esq.

Cristina Silva, Esq.

Emailed to chambers:

HONORABLE BRIDGET S. BADE

United States District Court

Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, Suite 324

401 West Washington Street, SPC 76

Phoenix, AZ 85003-2120

bade_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov

/s/ Andrea Yirak 

Case 2:18-mj-00105-MHB Document 9 Filed 02/13/18 Page 3 of 3
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: September 12, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gopi K. Panchapakesan, 

Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant Padilla, present; Joy M. 

Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 4):

9:01 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury is not present. Discussion held re: Exhibits and the Court’s rulings 

are as set forth on the record. 9:37 a.m. Recess. 

10:27 a.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion held re: the Court’s previous Order (Doc. 1081). 10:31 a.m. 

Jury present. Defendant Spear’s Opening Statement. 11:25 a.m. Defendant Padilla’s Opening 

Statement. 11:54 a.m. Recess.

1:03 p.m. Court reconvenes. 1:05 p.m. Jury present. Defendant Vaught’s Opening Statement. 1:32 p.m. 

Carl Ferrer sworn and examined. Exhibit 2030 admitted. 2:30 p.m. Recess. 

2:51 p.m. Court reconvenes. 2:53 p.m. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 1056, 1056a 

and 1057 are admitted. 4:34 p.m. Jury released for the evening. Discussion held with counsel re: 

Exhibits. 4:39 p.m. Court in recess until Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.

Court Reporter Hilda Lopez/Elaine Cropper

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 9:01 AM

Stop: 4:39 PM

Total: 5hrs 18min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1784 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 861 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 2, 2009. 

Whereas military families, through their sacrifices and their 

dedication to the United States and its values, represent 

the bedrock upon which the United States was founded 

and upon which the country continues to rely in these 

perilous and challenging times; and 

Whereas the month of November, which includes the Veterans Day holiday, was declared by the President on October 30, 2009, to be Military Family Month: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Military Family 

Month; 

(2) recognizes the sacrifices and dedication of military families and their contributions to the United 

States; and 
2 

•HRES 861 EH 

(3) expresses the appreciation to the people of the 

United States who observed Military Family Month with 

appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1




ROHAT RESOURCES, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rohat Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kok Cheang Lim, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Kok Cheang LimName:
Kok Cheang LimTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Interest of K.P., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 65142.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 13, 1994.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1994.

*751Nasreen Engle, Steven Lewis, St. Louis, for appellant.

Susan Clarissa Guerra, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the court’s judgment finding him to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court by reason of his unlawful use of a weapon in violation of § 571.030.1(1) RSMo 1986. On appeal Appellant asserts error in the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a warrantless search of the vehicle he was driving. We have reviewed the briefs and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-158]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Docket No. AB-12 (Sub-No. 170X)]


Southern Pacific Transportation Company--Abandonment Exemption--
in San Mateo County, CA

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission exempts from the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 
10903-06 the abandonment by Southern Pacific Transportation Company of 
approximately 2.54 miles of rail line, known as the San Bruno Branch, 
from milepost 10.80, at or near the Baden rail station, to milepost 
13.34, at or near the Tanforan rail station, in San Mateo County, CA, 
subject to standard labor protective conditions.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on January 20, 1996. Petitions 
to stay or reopen must be filed by January 16, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to Docket No. AB-12 (Sub-No. 
170X), to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate 
Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20423; <SUP>1 and (2) Petitioner's representatives: John MacDonald 
Smith, Gary A. Laakso, Southern Pacific Building, One Market Plaza, San 
Francisco, CA 94105 and Karl Morell, Louis E. Gitomer, Ball, Janik & 
Novack, Suite 1035, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20004.

    \1\ Legislation to terminate the Commission on December 31, 
1995, is now pending enactment. Until further notice, parties 
submitting pleadings should continue to use the current name and 
address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5610. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data Inc., Room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through TDD services at (202) 927-
5721.]

    Decided: December 21, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Owen, and 
Commissioner Simmons.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-158 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-17-00078-CR

FLORENCIO BARGAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-2016-07928-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Florencio Bargas has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.1 The motion was signed by 

both Bargas and his appellate counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2(a), we grant the 

motion. See id.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: July 17, 2017

Date Decided: July 18, 2017

Do Not Publish

 

1Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware 

of any conflict between precedent of the Second Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vincent T.  Donnelly,
President and Chief Executive Officer of PMA Capital Corporation, do  hereby certify, to
the best of my knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the  information contained in the Annual
Report of PMA Capital Corporation on Form  10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in  such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and results of operations of PMA Capital Corporation. A signed original of
this  written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

| |  |                                                         
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  |                                                         
| |  | /s/ Vincent T. Donnelly                                 
| |  | Vincent T. DonnellyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                                                         
| |  | March 12, 2004                                          

---
-.. . ·.. ' 

··-£· 

'-Jr.:' 

1 ·WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

. 9 United States of America, No. CR-18-08083-001-PCT-JJT 

IO Plaintiff, ORDER 

11 v. 

12 Archie Charles Yellow, 

13 

14 

Defendant. 

15 The defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 a 

_ 16 pretrial release revocation hearing was submitted. The Court finds by clear . and 

17 convincing evidence that the defendant has violated the terms of defendant's previously 

P 18 imposed pretrial release conditions as alleged in the Petition to Revoke. After 

19 considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), the Court concludes there are no 

20 conditions or combination of conditions which will assure the defendant will not flee or 

21 pose a danger to the safety of other persons or the community and that if there were such 

~7- 22 conditions the defendant is unlikely to abide by such conditions. 

23 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained. 

24 Dated this 13th day of July, 2018. 

25 

26 

27 

28
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) of
PennantPark Investment Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn
|Arthur H. Penn    
|February 2, 2011
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
KINGSLEY C APITAL M A NAGEM ENT, LLC , a n Ariz ona lim ite d lia

bility c om pa ny ; B R UC E PAINE KINGSLEY M D IR A R OLLOVER , Plaintiffs - Appe lla nts,
v. B R IAN NELSON SLY; B R IAN SLY AND C OM PANY, INC ., a C a lifornia c orporation, suc c e ssor in inte re st to B rian Sly and C om pa ny ; B R IAN SLY AND C OM PANY, a C a l ifornia sole proprie torship; C HARLES J. ANTONUC C I, Sr.; THOM AS J. B EAN; THOM AS C UNNINGHAM ; HEATHER D. C UNNINGHAM ; AC C REDITED INVESTOR

RESOUR C ES, LLC ; W ILB U R ANTHONY HUFF; SHER R I HUFF, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-15325 D.C . No. 2:10-c v-02243-NVW
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Ne il V. W ake , Distric t Judge , Pre siding 

# F IL ED
JAN 05 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.Argue d a nd Subm itte d M arc h

17, 2016 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

nd HUR W ITZ, C irc u it Judge s. Appe lla nts Kingsley

C a pita l M ana ge m e nt, LLC and B ruc e Pa ine Kingsle y M D IR A R ollove r (c o l le c tive ly , Kingsle y ) c ha lle nge the distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of the i r m otion for ne w tria l a nd/or m otion to alte r or am e nd judgm e nt pre m ise d on the j ury ’ s ve rdic t tha

t Appe l le e B ria

n Sly wa s lia ble for se c uritie s fra

ud unde r Ariz ona la

w, but a warding no da

m a ge s. Kingsle y

c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt
e rre d in holding tha

t the y c ould not se e k a

ne w tria l be c a

use the y fa ile d to
c ha lle nge the ve rdic t prior to disc ha rge of the jury
. Although Kingsle

y wa s a fforde d “ the opportunity to obje c t be fore the jury
wa s dism isse d,” Kingsle y “ c hose not to ra ise any

obje c tions to the jury ’ s ve rdic t.” Home Inde m. C

o. v . LanePow e ll Moss & Mille r , 43 F.3d 1322, 1331 (9th C ir. 1995). “ This c onstitute d a wa ive r of the obje c tion on a ppe a l.” Id. ; se e also Philippine

N at’l Oil C o . v . Garre tt C

orp. , 724 F.2d 803, 806 (9th C i r. 1984) (e xpla ining tha

t “ a pa rty tha t fa ile d to obje c t

to a no da m a ge s ve rdic t at

the tim e it
wa s re a d wa ive d a

ny future obje c tions to the

form of the ve rdic t” ). AFFIRM E D.

2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 17, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00624

- CV

L. M., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JU STICES PURYEAR, PEMB ERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on September 15, 2014. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.