Exhibit K

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 1 of 118
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

 _________________ 

United States of America, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) CR-18-0422-PHX-SMB 

 ) 

 vs. ) Phoenix, Arizona 

 ) September 13, 2021 

Michael Lacey, ) 8:53 a.m. 

James Larkin, ) 

Scott Spear, ) 

John Brunst, ) 

Andrew Padilla, ) 

Joye Vaught, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

______________________________) 

 

BEFORE: THE HONORABLE SUSAN M. BRNOVICH, JUDGE 

REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

TRIAL - DAY 7 - A.M. SESSION

Official Court Reporter: 

Linda Schroeder, RDR, CRR 

Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse, Suite 312 

401 West Washington Street, Spc. 32 

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151 

(602) 322-7249 

Proceedings Reported by Stenographic Court Reporter 

Transcript Prepared by Computer-Aided Transcription 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 2 of 118
 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

A P P E A R A N C E S 

For the Government: 

 U.S. Attorney's Office 

 By: PETER SHAWN KOZINETS, ESQ. 

 KEVIN M. RAPP, ESQ. 

 MARGARET WU PERLMETER, ESQ. 

 ANDREW C. STONE, ESQ. 

 40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200 

 Phoenix, AZ 85004 

 U.S. Department of Justice 

 By: REGINALD E. JONES 

 1400 New York Avenue NW, Suite 600 

 Washington, DC 20530 

For the Defendant Lacey: 

 Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria 

 By: PAUL JOHN CAMBRIA, JR., ESQ. 

 ERIN E. MCCAMPBELL PARIS, ESQ. 

 42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

 Buffalo, NY 14202 

For the Defendant Larkin: 

 Bienert Katzman 

 By: THOMAS HENRY BIENERT, JR., ESQ. 

 WHITNEY Z. BERNSTEIN, ESQ. 

 903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350 

 San Clemente, CA 92673 

For the Defendant Spear: 

 Feder Law Office 

 By: BRUCE S. FEDER, ESQ. 

 2930 East Camelback Road, Suite 160 

 Phoenix, AZ 85016 

For the Defendant Brunst: 

 Bird Marella Boxer Wolpert Nessim Drooks 

 Lincenberg & Rhow 

 By: GOPI K. PANCHAPAKESAN, ESQ. 

 GARY S. LINCENBERG, ESQ. 

 1875 Century Park E, Suite 2300 

 Los Angeles, CA 90067 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 3 of 118
 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

For the Defendant Padilla: 

 DAVID EISENBERG, PLC 

 By: DAVID S. EISENBERG, ESQ. 

 3550 North Central Avenue, Suite 1155 

 Phoenix, AZ 85012 

For the Defendant Vaught: 

 JOY BERTRAND ESQ, LLC 

 By: JOY MALBY BERTRAND, ESQ. 

 P.O. Box 2734 

 Scottsdale, AZ 85252 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 4 of 118
 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

INDEX

SUMMARY OF COURT PROCEEDINGS PAGE: 

Proceedings Outside the Presence of the Jury 5 

Proceedings Outside the Presence of the Jury 114 

INDEX OF WITNESSES 

WITNESSES FOR THE Direct Cross Redirect 

GOVERNMENT: (Bienert) 

FICHTNER, Brian 14 95 

 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 5 of 118
 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

(Proceedings outside the presence of the jury:) 

THE COURT: Okay. We're on the record outside the

presence of the jury. At 9:37 last night defendants filed a

motion in limine which, one, motions in limine deadline has

passed a long time ago. There's also a request for a Daubert

hearing in here, which the substantive motion deadline passed

in 2019, I think. So that request is denied.

However, the scope of Dr. Cooper's testimony seems to

be an issue. Who's handling Dr. Cooper?

MR. JONES: I am, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Jones, the noticed areas of

testimony are really all outside the scope of the areas that I

authorized. So what do you plan on having her testify about?

MR. JONES: Well, we'll have her testify, Your Honor,

you know, she's familiar, as we indicated, I think, as the

Court indicated in 1081, you know, how human trafficking, how

sex trafficking occurs online. And as we indicated,

Dr. Cooper's familiar with how victims are trafficked on

Backpage. And her opinions will be based on her education,

training, and her clinical and forensic experiences treating

victims of sex trafficking, as indicated in 1081 on Page 5.

Also, Dr. Cooper will testify as pertains to the

terminology, to explain the terminology and vernacular often

used in the trafficking and prostitution industry, which the

Court has deemed relevant as well. And as the government

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 6 of 118
 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

indicated -- it's also in criminal record 1081 -- Dr. Cooper

could explore terms unique to the vernacular of prostitution

and sex trafficking. Such information is not common to the

knowledge, and it's helpful to the jury. 

So those are the two areas that the government will

focus Dr. Cooper's -- will encompass Dr. Cooper's testimony.

One other point, Your Honor, similar but unrelated,

whenever the Court would like me to --

THE COURT: Is it related to Dr. Cooper?

MR. JONES: Yeah. We just wanted to -- We understood

the Court's order on last week regarding the relationship

between traffickers and pimps and their victims and common

methods sex traffickers use to maintain control of their

victims that the Court deemed is -- isn't relevant anymore to

this case. We would like to point out, though, that the

defendant on Friday afternoon, in cross-examination of one of

our victims, tended to open the door, attacking the credibility

of the victim based on her allegedly lying to law enforcement. 

And as the Court is aware, you know, often in the

trafficking industry, a way a pimp maintains control over their

victims is through, you know, force and fear and loyalty. And

so those are methods of control.

Also during the jury selection in this case, the

defendants also kind of talked around the fact that they may

try to elicit testimony on cross-examination from victims on

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 7 of 118
 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

the fact that they use substance abuse -- substance abuse was

used while they were trafficked as well as it pertains to their

credibility. And also, you know, the fact -- the relationship

between traffickers and pimps and how pimps maintain control

over their victims, as the Court is also aware, you know, the

use of substance abuse, you know, them being hooked on and

addicted to substance abuse is a way that they maintain control

over them. 

And so the government will not elicit testimony from

Dr. Cooper in that respect since it's not prepared to, but we

also do not believe the defense should be able to open the door

to that when they start to cross-examine some of our victims

during this trial.

THE COURT: Okay. I just asked you if what you were

going to ask me about related to Dr. Cooper, and you just told

me it doesn't.

MR. JONES: Well, no. The second part, yeah, it does

relate. We initially were going to have Dr. Cooper testify to

that fourth issue, but based on the Court's ruling last week,

we've now tailored her testimony to those -- to the two issues

that the Court deemed relevant for her -- relevant for expert

testimony in this case, and that is how sex trafficking occurs

online and the explanation of kind of the terminology and the

vernacular often used in the trafficking and the prostitution

industry.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 8 of 118
 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Bertrand.

MS. BERTRAND: Good morning, Your Honor. First, as to

Dr. Cooper testifying regarding terminology used in sex

industry ads, there's two problems with that. First, they

never noticed that as a topic of her testimony. I'm looking at

the government's notice here in 422.

It says, "She'll talk about how a victim can fall into

the world of sex trafficking through the grooming process, the

harmful lasting impact of sex trafficking on its victims,

relationship and loyalty of a child -- a child sex trafficking

victim may have with her trafficker, common ways a sex

trafficker can use force, fraud and coercion, and reasons why

child sex trafficking is cited as the most underreported form

of child abuse." That has nothing to do with translating

terminology in these ads.

Next -- I think we talked about this last week in a

couple other contexts -- the interpretation of these ads is an

ultimate issue for the jury to decide. And we've already sat

through hours of Mr. Fichtner's testimony where he's telling us

what's going on in those ads and how he interprets them. It

would be duplicative. But it's also not -- That is for the

jury to decide. But, most importantly, they never noticed

that.

So at this point Dr. Cooper's testimony, as they've

noticed it, is not relevant anymore. And this idea that we

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 9 of 118
 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

opened the door regarding asking the jury follow-up questions

about a question in the jury questionnaire doesn't open the

door to them preemptively putting on this witness. They even

said she might be a rebuttal witness. Maybe that will be the

case in November or December.

But for now they have not shown a basis to support any

of the noticed testimony. And this is about what the

government gives notice to.

They've also had nearly three years to amend this

notice. We requested an updated notice from them in July.

They refused to give one. They are now stuck with the topics

they noticed, and none of them are relevant.

MR. JONES: Your Honor, just briefly, the defense has

been put on notice that -- for both of those areas as it

pertains to Dr. Cooper. In fact, you know, the government

mentioned the fact that Dr. Cooper could testify to the

vernacular and terminology often used in the sex trafficking

and prostitution industry. In criminal record 958, Page 5, the

Court, in ruling on the expert motion in document 1081, Page

16, pointed out point blank "Dr. Cooper could explain certain

terms unique to the vernacular of the prostitution and sex

trafficking subculture. Such terms include 'new in town,'

'roses,' 'amber alert,' 'GFE,' 'PSE,' 'incall,' 'outcall,'

'Lolita,' and others. Such information is not common for most

jurors and would be helpful."

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 10 of 118
 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

So that's to Mrs. Bertrand's first point.

To her second point, as it pertains to how human

trafficking occurs through online media, you know, this was

also litigated. And the government indicated in its motion,

the Court in its ruling, that Dr. Cooper is familiar with how

victims are trafficked on Backpage, and her opinions will be

based on her education, training, and her clinical and forensic

experiences treating victims of sex trafficking, you know, all

relevant information. And it goes to how sex trafficking

occurs through online media, Your Honor.

THE COURT: I'm looking at the Doc 1081.

MR. JONES: Page 16 discusses the vernacular, sex

trafficking, and Dr. Cooper's proposed testimony in that area.

THE COURT: It does say that, but I don't know if I

just used the wrong name or if that came from your response.

MR. JONES: It did, Doc 958.

THE COURT: Because it was -- let's see -- Christina

Decoufle that was noticed for talking about the language. All

right. So the motion to preclude her testimony is denied. Of

course if she testifies about terminology, then your other

expert is not going to be allowed to testify about that.

MR. JONES: Understood, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And you will not be allowed to get into

the relationship between a trafficker and the victim at this

point. I agree that there is potential that the defense may

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 11 of 118
 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

have already opened the door or may in the future. So you can

reurge it at a later time for rebuttal if necessary.

MR. JONES: Thank you, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Do we have our jurors?

THE CLERK: I'm sorry?

THE COURT: Do we have our jurors?

(The Court and clerk confer off the record.)

THE COURT: While she is -- do I still have everybody?

Nobody left?

While she's getting the jurors, a juror did hand some

questions to Elaine at the end of the day, which I assume were

for Jessika, which was my fault that I didn't ask. So I'm just

going to let you know what the questions are.

The first one reads: "Did Jessika Svendgard have a

legal license to work as an escort?"

And then the second question reads: "Do all escorts

who take out ads on Backpage have license to work as escorts?"

MR. LINCENBERG: Your Honor, this is Mr. Lincenberg.

Which juror submitted that note?

THE COURT: I don't know. It's not signed because I

tell them not to.

MR. LINCENBERG: Oh, okay.

THE CLERK: They're all here. They're coming --

MS. PERLMETER: Your Honor, did Elaine --

THE COURT: One second. I have an issue on another

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 12 of 118
 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

case.

(The Court and clerk confer off the record.)

THE COURT: Yes?

MS. PERLMETER: This is in regards to witness Special

Agent Tera Mackey who the United States believes will testify

sometime today. So last week the defense, last Thursday the

defense, in document number 1291, which was their response to

the United States' memo regarding certain aspects of Nacole

Svengard's testimony, in their memo they mention that Tera

Mackey was a defendant in a civil lawsuit filed in the Eastern

District of California. That was a civil lawsuit filed by a

pro se litigant against then Governor Jerry Brown and a bunch

of other people. It was a complaint filed in 2017. It was

dismissed in 2018.

The government moves to preclude the defense from

mentioning this lawsuit when they question Special

Agent Mackey.

MR. LINCENBERG: Your Honor, this is Mr. Lincenberg.

I know that Ms. Bernstein is going to be doing the examination

of Ms. Mackey, and she's not in the courtroom.

THE COURT: She's up there.

MR. LINCENBERG: Oh, do you want to speak to it?

MS. BERNSTEIN: Your Honor, we were using that as an

example as to how the existence of a lawsuit does not mean

there's any merit whatsoever. I don't know the circumstances

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 13 of 118
 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

behind why Ms. Mackey was sued for $59 million by an inmate,

but as it was dismissed, don't presume that gave merit to the

claim. So we were using that as an example for Nacole

Svendgard. We do not plan to get into it with her.

THE COURT: Okay. The government's motion is granted

under Rule 401.

MS. PERLMETER: Thank you.

THE COURT: And we are starting with your cross,

correct?

MR. BIENERT: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Do you have that agent?

One of the jurors is not here, so I'm going to step

out.

(Proceedings recessed from 9:11 a.m. until 9:16 a.m.

Proceedings in the presence of the jury:)

THE COURT: We are back on the record with the jury

present. Agent Fichtner, you're still under oath from last

week. Do you understand?

THE WITNESS: Yes, I do.

THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Bienert.

MR. BIENERT: Your Honor, I apologize. I can get

started, but can I ask Ms. Elaine, madam clerk, for that

microphone that I cannot be wedded to this one here. I'm going

to start from here, but I'm going to move around this little

area. Thank you.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 14 of 118
 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

BRIAN FICHTNER, GOVERNMENT'S WITNESS, PREVIOUSLY SWORN 

CROSS-EXAMINATION 

BY MR. BIENERT: 

Q. Agent Fichtner, my name is Tom Bienert, and I represent

Mr. Larkin, one of the defendants in this case.

So when you were on the stand being questioned by

government counsel, he asked you if you were familiar with the

laws of California relating to prostitution, right?

A. Yes. 

Q. And you said you were, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And then you basically gave us a definition of prostitution

when he asked you about it, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And what you said was under California prostitution laws,

quote, you cannot solicit or arrange sex for money, right?

A. Correct.

Q. I hope this works. I assume that people can hear me.

Okay. Thank you.

Sir, that's all you said, right? You didn't give any

other definition of prostitution or terms of it when you were

being questioned by the government counsel, did you?

A. No.

MR. KOZINETS: Objection.

THE COURT: What's the objection? 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 15 of 118
 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

(Reporter interrupts for clarification.)

MR. KOZINETS: Misstates prior testimony. 

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Sir, you never gave us any terms of what

it means to commit prostitution in California other than you

cannot solicit or arrange sex for money, right?

A. That was the summary I gave, yes.

Q. Summary. Sir, prostitution is a specific crime with

specific elements, right?

MR. KOZINETS: I'm sorry. Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Right?

A. I assume every law has specifics to it.

Q. Okay. Well, you were here to talk about prostitution,

right?

A. Correct.

Q. That's the reason you're on the stand, right?

A. One of the reasons, yes.

Q. Okay. And California has specific terms to establish

prostitution, and they include, one, the defendant solicited

that another person engage in an act of prostitution, right?

A. I don't know the law verbatim.

Q. Well, sir, you got up here and told us you've been

investigating, among other things, sex crimes and prostitution

for many years, right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 16 of 118
 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. No, I did not.

Q. Okay. Well, when Mr. Kozinets asked you if you were

familiar with the laws of prostitution in California, you said

yes, right?

A. Yes.

Q. You didn't hedge your bets and say I don't know a lot about

it, did you?

A. No.

Q. You know, sir, that in order to convict someone of

prostitution or solicitation of prostitution, then someone has

to solicit or ask someone, another person, if they would like

to engage in an act of prostitution, right?

A. Solicit, engage, or arrange to engage.

Q. In an act of prostitution, right?

A. Again, I don't know the exact law verbatim, if that's --

Q. Does that sound generally right?

A. Okay. Yes.

Q. And, in addition, to be able to charge someone or convict

of prostitution, one would have to show that the defendant

intended to engage in an act of prostitution with another

person, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection, Your Honor.

THE COURT: What's your objection?

MR. KOZINETS: Foundation. I'm sorry. Can we do a

side bar?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 17 of 118
 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

THE COURT: Yes.

(Bench conference on the record as follows:)

MR. KOZINETS: Your Honor, this is Peter Kozinets. On

direct examination, Special Agent Fichtner was asked for his

general understanding of prostitution law in the State of

California, and he gave a general answer. He is not a lawyer.

He is not somebody who is in a position to testify about the

details of the law.

MR. BIENERT: Mr. Bienert speaking. Your Honor, he is

the one who asked the question, and it was literally are you

familiar with the laws of prostitution in California -- 

MR. KOZINETS: It was general.

THE COURT: Stop.

MR. KOZINETS: I'm sorry.

MR. BIENERT: -- and he said yes. The definition that

he gave was misleading. It was overly general. It did not

even get close to what prostitution is. I'm entitled to ask

this witness questions about that, because if these jurors

don't get an understanding of prostitution, they're being

misled, and it's the issue in the case. I'm allowed to

cross-examine him about what he said to this jury Friday.

THE COURT: Well, and he's clarified he doesn't know

the specific language of the statute, so any further

questioning is really argument. And I'm going to instruct them

on what the law is, not you through questioning him.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 18 of 118
 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

MR. BIENERT: But I am allowed to go back into what it

is, and I can certainly ask. If he says he doesn't know, he

can say that. But he -- it is grossly improper for

Mr. Kozinets to have this witness tell the jurors that

prostitution is sex for money when that is not even close to

what the definition is. It is a subset of that. And

everything that is outside of that subset is not prostitution.

And I'm going to show this witness and through this witness

that the ads that he spent a day talking to the witness about

are in the subset of sex that is not prostitution. That's

exactly what impeachment is, and it goes directly to

undermining the whole point that Mr. Kozinets had him testify

about.

THE COURT: Well, you can ask him about the ads, but

he's already admitted that he doesn't know the exact language

of the statute.

MR. BIENERT: But he doesn't have to say it exactly.

If he says that I'm generally correct, we go from there. This

jury -- Here's what's going to happen. I'm going to show him

ads.

THE COURT: Yes.

MR. BIENERT: And I'm going to point out why they're

not prostitution. But if the jury hasn't heard anything about

what the definition of prostitution really is, it means

nothing. Now, I am totally fine I can give Your Honor the

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 19 of 118
 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

California criminal procedure model instructions on

prostitution, and I would be more than happy if Your Honor read

them to the jury. That would be fine. And then I don't have

to ask him about it. I go from there.

But it's unfair and improper for me to be questioning

this witness to show that what he said is overly general, the

ads complained about are illegal, non-prostitution ads, without

being able to show what prostitution is.

So I just -- Alternatively I would say I have the

California criminal jury instructions with me. I would ask

that you give them, Your Honor, now, and you instruct the jury

as to what it really is.

MR. KOZINETS: This is Peter Kozinets. Special

Agent Fichtner's direct examination involved showing the jury

what the Backpage website actually looked like in 2015,

including the escort section. He did not testify as to

alternate legal conclusions. In fact, there were objections

whenever he approached making such comments. And so the notion

that it's even, I think, properly within the scope of

cross-examination to ask him specifics of California law

involving prostitution and how they apply to these ads is

simply inappropriate for this witness.

MR. LINCENBERG: That's not accurate.

THE COURT: Stop. The objection is sustained. As I

remember his testimony, he was not allowed to testify about

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 20 of 118
 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

whether this was sex for money or not or any ultimate legal

conclusion. So the objection is sustained.

MR. LINCENBERG: May I be heard?

THE COURT: You can be heard later.

(End of bench conference.)

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Just want to make sure I'm heard.

Sir, you testified Friday you went through all of

these ads, many of them, and you basically said that you

believed they were prostitution based on looking at the ads,

right?

A. That is one of the factors, yes.

Q. But if I'm understanding you now, you're basically telling

us that you don't really know what the definition of

prostitution is in California, right?

A. Verbatim?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: 647(b) of the California Penal Code

basically states if you solicit, engage, or arrange to engage

in prostitution, it's a violation of the lewd conduct in

California.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) And what is a lewd act in California?

A. I don't know the legal term behind the lewd act, but if you

negotiate for sex, that would be an act of prostitution.

Q. Sir, you just cited Section 647(b), which is the statute in

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 21 of 118
 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

California that deals with making prostitution illegal, right?

A. Correct.

Q. And the statute says that it is prostitution if you engage

in a lewd act, right, for money?

A. For money.

Q. Right?

A. Yes.

Q. And then the very same section goes on to define lewd act

by reference to California Supreme Court cases, right?

A. If you say so.

Q. Well, are you saying you don't know?

A. I am not an attorney. I don't know the complete law, no.

Q. Okay. Is it true, sir, that in California, in order to

have prostitution, it must involve for money touching the

genitals, buttocks, or female breast, having contact with the

other person? Right?

A. I'm sorry. Is that a question referencing what is said in

647(b)?

Q. I'm asking you, since you just referenced the term lewd

act, which is what you need to be guilty of prostitution,

right?

A. That's what it falls under 647(b). It is what it falls

under in the California Penal Code.

Q. And 647(b), according what you just said, says prostitution

equals a lewd act for money, right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 22 of 118
 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. Yes.

Q. And is it true, sir, that the definition of a lewd act,

which is further defined, is touching the genitals, buttocks,

or female breast, having contact with the other person for

sexual gratification?

A. Further defined in 647(b)?

Q. Further defined in the California Supreme Court and set

forth at 647(b) in the criminal jury instructions?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled. You can answer

if you know.

THE WITNESS: I don't know.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Okay. So we're back to what I started

with after our little side bar. You just spent all this time

supposedly telling everyone here what you think or don't think

is prostitution about those ads, but the true facts are you

don't even know what the definition of a lewd act which equals

prostitution in California is? Right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative and misstates

prior testimony.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) You don't know what the definition of a

lewd act is in California, do you?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Asked and answered.

MR. BIENERT: I had an objection, and I rephrased it

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 23 of 118
 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

because he didn't answer because you sustained it.

THE COURT: He answered that before the last question.

The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Okay. Do you agree with me, sir, that in

order to assess these ads to make an independent judgment for

anyone looking at them, one would need to have an understanding

of what a lewd act is that constitutes prostitution in

California?

A. Yes.

Q. And you don't have that?

A. The legal definition? I don't know it as a legal

definition.

Q. The truth is, sir, a lot of things that could be

characterized as sex or sexual conduct in California are not

prostitution, right?

A. I'm not sure what you're referring to.

Q. Well, an escort or an adult services provider or an adult

performer or a sensual massage artist could appear with a

paying client buck naked, and that is not prostitution, right?

A. I assume that those are licensed, and they're not crossing

the line of 647(b). Yes, I guess it's legal. I don't know.

Q. Meaning no touchy in the genitals, right?

MR. KOZINETS: I'm sorry. Objection. Just form,

foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 24 of 118
 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) If the person who is nude, dancing,

moving around naked, sensually rubbing the other person's back

for money is not touching the genitals of that person, it is

not prostitution in California, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: It's the ultimate question. The

objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) You also mentioned, when you were

answering a minute ago, you said if that person is licensed,

you assumed it would be okay. What license were you referring

to?

A. What I referred to earlier, which is just what I know in

the Sacramento County area. I know they require a business

license and a special license for certain professions.

Q. Well, sir, that's only to become a licensed member of that

profession, like escort, adult performer, or stripper, right?

That's what the licensing requirement is for, correct?

A. If you say so.

Q. Well, do you know one way or the other?

A. I have a brief overview of it. I don't know it inside and

out, no.

Q. So when you got up here on Friday, and you talked to us

about the escort rules and regulations in Sacramento, you

didn't really -- you don't really know those either, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 25 of 118
 25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: Like I said, I just know a summary of

it. I have a basic understanding of it.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, you knew enough in your basic

understanding for when Mr. Kozinets asked you about the

Sacramento city regulations about escort, you gave answers,

right?

A. For the county, yes.

Q. So let's talk about licensing. Whether one -- Strike that.

The Sacramento code talks about under what

circumstances certain adult performers and service persons can

work with a license in Sacramento, correct?

A. I assume they do.

Q. And it basically covers strippers, escorts, adult

performers, sensual massage artists, among others, correct?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: Again, I assume they do. I don't know

it completely.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) But whether or not -- Strike that.

And it defines types of behavior that equate to what

strippers, escort service providers, adult performers, and

sensual massage artists do, correct?

A. I don't know it in that depth.

Q. Well, one thing you do know is whether or not someone has a

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 26 of 118
 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

license or not is a totally separate issue than whether

someone's conduct violates a specific law like prostitution,

true?

A. Somebody's conduct is what violates 647(b), correct.

Q. Sir, I need a license to drive my car, and I can't drive my

car drunk. But if when I got out of court today and I'm stone

sober and I drive and get caught by a cop with no license, that

doesn't make me guilty of driving under the influence of

alcohol, does it? They're different concepts, right? 

A. Yes.

Q. So licensing is a totally different issue. Let me back up.

Licensing to be an escort, for example, and whether

one has paid the money to the City of Sacramento to be an

escort and get a license is a totally different issue than

whether someone actually committed prostitution, right?

A. Yes.

Q. But when you were asked questions by Mr. Kozinets, you

seemed to draw a relationship between escort and prostitution,

right? That's the way he asked you the questions and you

answered, true?

MR. KOZINETS: I'm sorry. Objection. Argumentative.

Form.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Sir, he asked you about escorts.

Obviously I hadn't spoken to you yet. Right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 27 of 118
 27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. Yes.

Q. And he asked you about escorts right on the heels of going

over things that related to prostitution, true?

A. "Right on the heels," you mean?

Q. Well, yes or no. If you don't know, say so.

A. Yes.

Q. What you were suggesting, sir, is that if someone did not

have an escort license, then they must be doing illegal

prostitution, right? That's what you were trying to convey on

Friday. True?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Form.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: No. I was separating the two.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Okay. Because had someone gotten that

misimpression, had someone in this room thought that failure to

have an escort license equaled prostitution, they would be

confused, correct?

A. Ask that one more time. I'm sorry.

Q. Sure. Had someone in this room mistakenly believed, based

on your questioning from Mr. Kozinets, that the failure to have

an escort license in Sacramento meant they were doing illegal

prostitution, they would be confused and incorrect, true?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Misstates prior testimony.

Form. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 28 of 118
 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

THE WITNESS: Now, if you're asking if they're not a

licensed escort, which means they're a prostitute, no.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Correct. That's just not the way it

works, right? Prostitution has to be proven on a stand-alone

basis if someone can establish the elements of prostitution,

whatever they are, true?

A. Stand-alone, yes.

Q. And it's a totally different issue than whether someone is

or isn't an escort, adult services provider, dancer, massage

artist, or adult performer, and whether they do or don't have a

license, true?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, you were asked by Mr. Kozinets some example questions

related to escort. For example, he said something to you like

did you see any ads and all those things on Backpage you looked

at where somebody said let's go have a cup of coffee? Do you

remember that?

A. Yes.

Q. And you said no. Right?

A. I said no.

Q. And he also said did you see anybody on that Backpage

website saying how about we go on a date and go to dinner? Do

you remember that?

A. Yes.

Q. And you said no? Right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 29 of 118
 29

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I said no.

Q. And what you were trying to convey through that questioning

was a suggestion that these ads were not escort ads, right?

A. I was answering his questions.

Q. All right. By the way, let's talk about answering his

question. You have never seen me, spoken to me, or

communicated before with me in your life, right?

A. No.

Q. In fact, you've never had communication with anybody on

what I'll call the defense crew side of the courtroom, true?

A. True.

Q. But you spent a lot of time with Mr. Kozinets before your

testimony, right?

A. I spent time with Mr. Kozinets.

Q. How many meetings and communications have you had with

Mr. Kozinets before you came to testify, ballpark?

A. Several.

Q. What does several mean? More than 20?

A. No. Less than 20.

Q. More than ten?

A. Could be.

Q. And you spent many, many hours with him either

communicating, talking on the phone, or meeting, right?

A. Yes.

Q. 40 hours or more?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 30 of 118
 30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I didn't keep track. I'm sorry.

Q. It could be as much, right? 

A. It could be as much.

Q. You could have spent literally one week of your work time

with Mr. Kozinets for purposes of preparing your testimony

right here in front of all of us, right?

A. Yes.

Q. Well, when you gave these -- Did this answer -- So, first

of all, none of the questions that he asked you came as a

surprise, did they?

A. None of them? I -- Yes, I guess not all questions that he

asked were the questions he had asked before.

Q. You guys went over in advance what you were going to talk

about from the witness stand, true?

A. Yes.

Q. And you knew, among other things, that you were going to be

asked about and give testimony about escorts as it relates to

the codes in Sacramento, true?

A. Yes.

Q. Well, let's look at the Sacramento city code. And if we

could, just for purposes of the witness, if we could have IM4

put up on the screen. And I apologize, Your Honor. It's the

first time I'm doing this in your court. My understanding is

we give it our own designation, and once it is on the screen,

your madam clerk will give it an actual court number. But if

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 31 of 118
 31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

I'm missing that, I want to make sure I'm doing it right.

THE COURT: It should have already been --

(The Court and clerk confer off the record.)

THE COURT: So, yes, Mr. Bienert, for impeachment

material, if it is admitted, it will get a number. If it is

not admitted, it will not get a number.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Okay. Sir, can you take a look at what I

am referring to as IM4 in front of you. And, by the way, as

usual, I screwed up. Let's try changing this a little to IM16,

one six, IM16. I wish I were 16 but IM16.

Do you see that in front of you, sir?

A. Yes.

Q. And IM16, do you recognize this as being part of Sacramento

adult business codes?

A. For the city code?

Q. Yeah.

A. I'm not familiar with Sacramento city code.

Q. Well, sir, they have these codes for the counties, the

cities all over the state, true?

A. Yes.

Q. And at least as it relates to adult related services, the

codes are pretty well the same from the city, the county, and

others, true?

A. I don't know.

Q. Well, is it true, sir, that -- And if we can, just for

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 32 of 118
 32

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

purposes of the monitor, go to the second page of IM -- Oh,

wait. I'm sorry. Go back right where we are.

Is it true, sir, that there's a definition of escort

about a third of the way down?

A. Yes.

Q. Is it true, sir, that an escort is someone who escorts or

accompanies others to or about social affairs, entertainment,

or places of amusement, right?

A. Yes, that's what it says.

Q. And that of course would be: Hey, do you want to go to

dinner? Hey, how about we go to Starbucks? 

That would fall under that prong of escort, right?

A. Sounds like it, yes.

Q. But is it also true that an escort is someone who, quote,

keeps company with others about any place of public resort or

within any private quarters, right?

A. That's what it says, yes.

Q. Well, sir, you understand that an escort isn't necessarily

just about going to dinner or Starbucks, but an escort can go

to someone's house, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And an escort can go to a hotel room with someone, right?

A. Any private quarters it says, yes.

Q. So an escort can go to my house, true?

A. Yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 33 of 118
 33

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. And I can go to the escort's house or private quarters,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. And we can all do that with me paying the escort money,

true?

A. Yes.

Q. Escorts are paid for their services, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And for purposes of every single thing that you went over

with us the other day in this courtroom, the portion of the

escort definition, if applicable at all, was this second part.

It was about what advertisers do or don't do when they're in

private quarters, right?

A. I'm sorry. Restate that again.

Q. Sure. Is it true, sir, that for all of the stuff that you

went over with us on Friday and I think even Thursday, none of

it had to do with this issue of escorts or whatever they were

going to dinner or Starbucks, right?

A. All the stuff we went over? The ads?

Q. Yeah.

A. No.

Q. Those ads had to do with what does or doesn't happen behind

private closed doors, right?

A. I don't know. I'd have to look back at the ads, but, yes,

I guess, in a sense, yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 34 of 118
 34

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Let me ask you this, sir. When you told us all here this

information about escort and limited the question and answer to

dinner and Starbucks, why didn't you tell us that an escort is

allowed to go into private places and do things for money?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Form. Misstates prior

testimony.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I was not asked.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, you knew in advance you were going

to be asked about the escort provisions of the codes dealing

with adult services, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And you had meetings with Mr. Kozinets about it, right?

A. Yes.

Q. When you met with Mr. Kozinets outside of this courtroom,

did you let him know that the term escort didn't just apply to

things like dinner and Starbucks but applied to escorts being

paid to go into, for example, people's houses?

A. I don't know if it was stated that way, in people's houses.

Q. Well, would you have in any way, shape, or form suggested

to this gentleman right here for the government, the

prosecutor, by the way, so no one is confused, the term escort

also goes a lot beyond dinner and coffee, but it includes

things like being paid to go to someone's private quarters?

MR. KOZINETS: Form.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 35 of 118
 35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I think the way I described the escort

was one person hiring another person to spend time as long as

they didn't violate the law.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Okay. So you may not have educated him

that escort includes going into private quarters for money?

A. You mean the city code here? I did not know the city code.

Q. Well, sir, you knew and full well understood that that is

also how it is defined in the Sacramento County code, right?

A. Again, I don't know the code verbatim.

Q. But you did give questions and answers related to escort

when he asked you questions, true?

A. I did give answers when he asked.

Q. When he asked you the questions, why didn't you tell us all

that you really didn't know those rules?

A. I gave a summary of the rules.

Q. Well, you sure left out the part about going to private

quarters, didn't you?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained. Mr. Bienert,

you need to remain closer.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Sure. And, by the way, this whole idea

of an escort, these codes don't just limit things to escorts.

They talk about adult performers, right? I'm just talking

about your general knowledge now independent of this document.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 36 of 118
 36

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Is it true, sir, that you understand that these county

or city codes dealing with adult services also deal with things

like adult performers, right?

A. I believe so.

Q. And they deal with things like strippers, true?

A. Adult performers, I believe so.

Q. Yeah. It's all in the same general category of adult

services, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And not only is it lawful to engage in such services, but

when one wants to get a license for such adult services, they

walk into a government building like a police department, say

I'm an escort or an adult performer, and I want to get a

license to do that. Right?

A. Yes.

Q. So, in other words, the law enforcement folks are the ones

who actually receive and have access to their information so

it's known that these types of services are legal and can be

performed in that jurisdiction, right?

A. That's my understanding in Sacramento County, is they

approve the application.

Q. And when they approve the application, they give money to

the county, right?

A. I don't know the financial transaction of the application.

Q. Well, is it your understanding that in order for an escort

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 37 of 118
 37

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

adult services provider, stripper, sensual massage artist to

get a license, they pay money to the county?

A. I would assume they do.

Q. And the county takes that money, doesn't it?

A. I assume they do.

Q. County doesn't say, "Whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm concerned you

could do something illegal. Your money's not good here," does

it?

A. I don't know what they say, but they probably don't say

that.

Q. They keep the money, right?

A. I assume.

Q. Sir, let's talk a little bit about your exhibits, your

video. And if we could pull up, just for your own edification

and the government and the Court, I will represent to you that

we took your video and went through it and just made some still

photos so we don't have to wait for everything to go those

seconds. What I'm proposing to do, unless there is a problem

with it, is direct you on the your only screen to screenshots

to look at. And once we confirm that they are from your video,

I will ask you questions.

A. Okay.

Q. All right. So, first, if we could go ahead and put up what

I'm calling IM17. And I'm going to want you to look at this

and tell us if you agree that this is a screenshot of what you

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 38 of 118
 38

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

put up in your video at 20 seconds.

A. It looks like it, yes.

MR. BIENERT: Your Honor, I'd ask if we can publish

what is IM17 so the jurors can see it.

THE COURT: Which exhibit is this part of? 

MR. BIENERT: It's part of Government's Exhibit 489A

at 20 seconds.

THE COURT: Okay. All right. You may publish it.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So, sir, this is the Backpage kind of

table of contents, and of course it shows there are many, many,

many types of ads at Backpage, right?

A. Yes. I think there's 11 categories.

Q. So for purposes of your undercover, as you're calling it,

you went ahead, and you chose what categories to hone in on and

use, right?

A. I chose, yes, those categories.

Q. All right. And so you chose to hone in on adult and

escorts in particular, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And then of course somewhere over here in the

buy/sell/trade, you would have presumably, under furniture, you

would have chosen to hone in on that one, right?

A. Yes.

Q. But suffice it to say there are thousands of ads a month in

many categories on the Backpage website, true?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 39 of 118
 39

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I don't know the numbers, but I would guess so. 

Q. And, by the way, is it true that until July of 2015,

Backpage always required people posting in the adult section to

actually pay something for the ad?

A. Yes.

Q. And is it true, sir, that by requiring people to pay for

the ad, it gets a credit card number that allows Backpage, if

ever necessary, to have a lead on who bought the ad, true?

A. Not always.

Q. I'm sorry?

A. Not always.

Q. Okay. Well, I'm -- Did you once -- You've given some

declarations under oath in this case, right?

A. Yes.

Q. Is it true, sir, that you gave a declaration under oath in

this case where you said until July, 2015, Backpage required

that people actually pay for each adult ad?

A. Yes.

Q. And did you indicate in that same declaration that it was

usually with credit card?

A. I don't know if I said that.

Q. Well, as you sit here now, is that a true statement, that

it was typically credit card?

A. That I don't know.

Q. Okay. By the way, if I'm following what you were doing,

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 40 of 118
 40

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

you were sitting here in present time, September, 2021, showing

us a video of what the Backpage Sacramento website looked like

to you in this example with 489A on March 6, 2015, true?

A. Yes.

Q. But you understood from your investigation that the

Backpage website was an interactive, operable website where one

could look for all different types of things on the website,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. And you understood, sir, that that website was intact and

existing as of 2018 when the government seized it, true?

A. I believe it was. I was not part of the investigation at

that time.

Q. Anybody from the government ever -- By the way, it's your

understanding that the government has all the gizmos and

components that actually are the website, right?

A. I'm sorry. Say that one more time.

Q. Is it your understanding, sir, that the government, these

guys over here, have the hard drives, the computers, all the

components that are the website?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I do not know what evidence the

government here has.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Has anybody from the government ever

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 41 of 118
 41

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

asked you to look at the website, to look at it and tell them

if it looked like it did when you saw it?

A. I'm sorry. State that one more time.

Q. Did anyone over at the government side here ever ask you to

look at the Backpage website as it was whenever they took it in

2018?

A. No.

Q. All right. Now, if we can go to what I am going to call

IM18. We can just put it up on the screen solely for the

witness.

I'd ask you to look at this and tell me if you

recognize it as your video screenshot at 33 seconds.

A. I don't know the time, but it looks like a screenshot of my

video.

MR. BIENERT: Your Honor, I'd ask if we can publish

what I'm calling IM18.

THE COURT: Any objection? All right. You may

publish it.

MR. BIENERT: And, by the way, before I get too far

ahead of myself, I am going to ask to move into evidence what

was IM17, the screenshot at 20 seconds that we went over a few

moments ago. And if it's allowed in, I would want to get, I

guess, the proper exhibit number for it.

MR. KOZINETS: No objection.

THE COURT: Okay.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 42 of 118
 42

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

MR. BIENERT: And just to be expedient, if it's

easier, Your Honor, for the staff and for your madam clerk,

look, I can do all of this at the end, but I don't know if it's

better to do it as I go or at the end.

THE COURT: Why don't we do it all at the end.

MR. BIENERT: That's fine, so she doesn't have to keep

getting up and down.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) All right. So let's go back to IM18,

which is now on the screen, and this is a still shot of what

you showed us on the video that you took from March 6, 2015,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. And basically it has a big listing of a whole bunch of ads

that are under the adult section and specifically under the

section called Sacramento escorts. Do you see that?

A. Yes.

Q. And if we look over at the very right-hand side, the second

entry in, there's something called Children of the Night. And

that's something that you were asked about by Mr. Kozinets and

commented on, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And he basically had you say it makes reference to turning

tricks and asked you what that meant, true?

A. Yes.

Q. Well, sir, is it true that Children of the Night is a

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 43 of 118
 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

non-profit organization that actually helps people who are

victimized by trafficking?

A. Yes.

Q. And is it true that Children of the Night is there to try

to help people who feel like they're being pressured or

involuntarily engaging in adult activities, even prostitution,

as opposed to people who are doing it consensually?

A. On this website, yes.

Q. And are you aware of the fact that Children of the Night

advertises in a lot of different medium, not just Backpage?

A. I don't know.

Q. Were you aware that Backpage contributed millions of

dollars to Children of the Night to help in its mission of

helping people who have been victimized by trafficking?

A. I don't know what money Backpage gives Children of the

Night. 

Q. Did you know that they gave any money to Children of the

Night?

A. I don't know.

Q. You certainly don't quarrel with the fact that if one is

really trying to help with the situation of people

involuntarily being engaged in the sex business, that a good

place to place such ads and reach an audience would be on a

page that has escorts, which could be legal adult services, but

to see if there are people there who might need help? True?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 44 of 118
 44

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I think --

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Form.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) When this was highlighted -- Strike that.

You don't see any illegality or problem, do you, from

a legal standpoint, with Backpage allowing an ad for Children

of the Night to be on its website, do you?

A. I think it's appropriate to put something like this on

Backpage's website.

Q. And to the degree that Children of the Night puts these

types of ads in other places, everything from other websites to

billboards to sides of buses, you believe that would be

appropriate too, right?

A. To put it anywhere? Sure.

Q. Now, you talked a lot about numbers with Mr. Kozinets. He

went over with you page by page by page counting ads. Do you

remember that?

A. Yes.

Q. And if I was following it correctly, you got to the point

where you said to the effect, yes, it appears like there were

about 300 ads that came in in 27 hours during the time that you

started your undercover investigation until a later time. Do

you recall that?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, first of all, let's talk about those ads. Is it true,

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 45 of 118
 45

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

sir, that a lot of the ads that were coming in during those 27

hours were the same ads that had been on the page when you had

looked at it earlier, but because they had paid for the upgrade

to have it repeatedly posted, it just appeared again, true?

A. I don't know.

Q. But you do know that Backpage, like many websites, allows

people to upsell or upgrade to let their ad run many times,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. In fact, that's what you did. When you went in, you could

have posted your adult section ad for $10, but you made a

decision to continue to upsell and upgrade to get a bunch of

different services that made the ad appear more often, right?

A. More often or at the top of the list. My understanding is

it took it to the top of the list. I don't know if it reposted

it over and over.

Q. Okay. Whatever it was, you took steps to make that price

go from $10 to $111, I think, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And whatever this was, it was to get more prominent

visibility on Backpage than one actually had to do if they

didn't want to, true?

A. Yes.

Q. But, regardless, the point of your testimony is there were

a lot of ads that went up on Backpage during that 27-hour time

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 46 of 118
 46

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

frame, right?

A. Yes.

Q. Sir, is it also true that in that same time frame, March,

2015, there are thousands and thousands of escort ads or ads

that look a lot like the Backpage ones on other sites that are

readily available as well?

A. There were other ads on the website, yes.

Q. But there are other websites that readily in Sacramento

advertised similar type services, true?

MR. KOZINETS: Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled. You can answer

if you know.

THE WITNESS: I assume there was.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, I mean, you're a guy who

investigates this type of behavior, true, at least in March of

2015, right?

A. Yes. I was investigating Backpage in 2015.

Q. Well, in investigating Backpage, did you want to understand

the area in which they operated to, for among other reasons,

say what are these guys seeing that's out there, and how might

that affect what they're thinking about the legality of what

they're doing?

MR. KOZINETS: Form.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: Yes. But the others weren't -- I was

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 47 of 118
 47

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

not investigating the others at that time.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, sir, let me ask you if you've heard

of any of these and whether they in fact were advertising the

same type stuff at the same times. AdultSearch.com?

A. I am not familiar with that one, no.

Q. AdultLook.com?

A. I was not familiar with that one.

Q. CallEscort.org?

A. Not familiar.

Q. Eros.com?

A. Not familiar with it.

Q. EroticMonkey.com?

A. I'm not familiar.

Q. EscortAffair.com?

A. I am not familiar with that one.

Q. Escort Alligator or Escort Babylon?

A. I am not familiar with those.

Q. You never looked at any of those sites?

A. Of those? No.

Q. And, sir, I've just named for you one, two, three -- eight

websites, and we have only gotten to the E's. Is it true to

say that whichever cites you looked at, you knew and understood

that at the time that you were investigating Backpage, there

were literally dozens and dozens of outlets available online to

people in Sacramento that advertised escorts and things that

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 48 of 118
 48

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

were a lot more blatant than that? True?

MR. KOZINETS: Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Did you look at, let's call it in the

entire year of 2015, did you look at any websites that dealt in

the area of adult services other than Backpage?

A. EvilEmpire.com.

Q. And that's one that you affiliate with Carl Ferrer, right?

A. And Backpage.

Q. Right. When Carl Ferrer owned Backpage, right?

A. Amongst others, I believe.

Q. Well, sir, is it true that you gave a declaration in the

past under oath, and you specifically pointed out that at one

point Carl Ferrer started Evil Empire, right?

A. I believe so. I don't remember exactly.

Q. You also pointed out in a declaration under oath that you

knew or understood sometime in 2015ish time frame, that four of

the defendants here who owned Village Voice Media, which owned

Backpage, sold Backpage to Carl Ferrer?

A. That's my understanding.

Q. And is it true, sir, that what Carl Ferrer did with Evil

Empire was after he became the owner of Backpage, having had it

sold to him by the defendants?

A. I don't know.

Q. All right. So other than Evil Empire, that's the only

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 49 of 118
 49

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

other website you can think of that you looked at in an entire

calendar year, other than Backpage, while you were doing this

investigation? Am I understanding that right?

A. No.

Q. What other ones did you look at?

A. I'm sure I looked at Craigslist.

Q. Okay. Because Craigslist was still in existence and

frankly is to this day, true?

A. Yes.

Q. And one could find on Craigslist adult services classified

ads, true?

A. On this day?

Q. 2015, yes.

A. In 2015?

I think by then they had taken down their adult

services section.

Q. My question's different, sir. If we go back and look at --

Why don't we look at Exhibit -- Let's go back to Exhibit IM17.

Can we pull that up to the jury.

It's already been displayed, Your Honor.

So, sir, once again, there's a whole lot of different

things on Backpage, true?

A. Yes. There's different categories.

Q. And there were a lot of different categories on Craigslist,

true?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 50 of 118
 50

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. Yes.

Q. And if we look, just by example, on Backpage, over here,

the third column, we have dating and adult. Do you see that?

A. Yes.

Q. So let's focus on dating. Women for men, men for women

et cetera, that is another place where ads, classified ads,

addressing sexual activities appears in both Backpage and

Craigslist, true?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Vague as to time. Form.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, in 2015, you understood that --

let's just say Craigslist -- Craigslist still had a personals

or dating section, right?

A. I think so.

Q. And Craigslist had many explicit ads in sections that were

no longer called adult services but were on Craigslist

nonetheless under things like dating or services. Is that

true?

A. They may have.

Q. Well, you looked at Craigslist. Is it true that you would

have actually seen ads of that ilk on Craigslist during

calendar year 2015?

A. Yeah. I can't remember the -- what all was in the -- were

in those ads at that time but -- but possibly, yes.

Q. Now, sir, so far, other than Craigslist, we've been talking

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 51 of 118
 51

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

about I guess what I would say non-household term websites,

right, Adult Search, Escort Alligator. Those, would you agree,

are not commonly widely known websites?

A. I don't know.

Q. But you do know that Facebook is extremely well known,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. And in 2015 as well as through today, one can go on

Facebook and get escort pages, true?

A. I'm not on Facebook, so I don't know.

Q. How about Google Groups? One can go on Google Groups and

get escort chat rooms all about adult services, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Beyond the scope.

MR. BIENERT: Response.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I don't know.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Is it true, sir, that if one types in

Google Groups today, you get over 3,000 groups dedicated to

talking about escorts?

A. I don't know.

Q. Google. If one just goes to Google and types in Sacramento

escorts, thousands and thousands of escort ads, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Counsel is testifying.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

MR. BIENERT: I'm sorry, Your Honor. I couldn't hear

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 52 of 118
 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

you.

THE COURT: Sustained as to that question.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Instagram has adult ads on it, right?

A. I'm not on Instagram. I don't know.

Q. LinkedIn, adult ads?

A. I'm not on LinkedIn. I don't know.

Q. Snapchat, TikTok, Tinder, all of them, right?

A. I don't know.

Q. Because you didn't look?

A. I'm not on those apps.

Q. Now, let me bring it back to what you were on. You spent

time telling us here about how many ads there were, 300 in a

27-hour period, which could have included re-ads. You told us

about that. But the reality is what you did know, whether you

took the time to look at particular escort ad sites or not, is

there were thousands of others on other websites available.

True?

A. I don't know.

Q. You also, is it true, sir, that most of these other

websites, things like Google or Facebook, which you've used in

the past, right?

A. Yes.

Q. They don't even ask for age verification, do they?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled. You could

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 53 of 118
 53

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

answer if you know.

THE WITNESS: I don't know.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, you do know you were asked by

Mr. Kozinets about the issue of age verification. Do you

remember that?

A. Yes.

Q. And you do know that Backpage actually did say do not enter

this site unless you're 18, true?

A. Yes.

Q. And Backpage said if you are under 18, you can't post on

our ad site at all, right?

A. That's what the rules said, I believe.

Q. And there were other rules about not trafficking people,

things of that ilk, are literally on Backpage, true?

A. Yes.

Q. And what it does is it requires at least anyone going on

Backpage and posting an ad has to at least represent that

they're not doing any of those things, true?

A. Yes. It's on the honor system.

Q. But Facebook and Google, they don't even ask for an honor

system, do they?

MR. KOZINETS: Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, when you went on Facebook, have you

ever had to represent that you were over 18?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 54 of 118
 54

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I'm not on Facebook.

Q. I thought you said a minute ago you've used Facebook?

A. As a -- Yes, but not as a user like an account or creating

one.

Q. It's a simple question, sir. Have you ever gone on

Facebook and had to represent that you were 18 or older? 

A. No.

Q. Same thing with Google. Ever have to represent that you're

18 or over to use Google?

A. No.

Q. YouTube, ever have to represent that you're over 18 to use

YouTube?

A. I don't know if --

Q. Is it true, sir, that on YouTube, you can see escort ads,

right?

A. I don't know.

Q. Did you -- Is it true, sir, that on YouTube, you can

actually find videos that tell you how to find escort ads and

where they are?

MR. KOZINETS: Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I don't know. I haven't looked.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Would it concern you if one could go on

YouTube and watch videos that tell one how to find all the

adult activities on the website or on the Internet to be able

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 55 of 118
 55

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

to do whatever sexual activities people want, legal or illegal?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection is sustained for relevance.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) All right. Let's start talking now about

some of these ads that you went over with us. Now, first of

all, you're generally familiar with the indictment in this

case, right?

A. In this case?

Q. Yeah.

A. Very limited. Generally.

Q. Do you have an understanding that there are particular ads

that are specifically referenced in the indictment as part of

the charged case, right?

A. If you say so.

Q. Well, no. If you don't know, just say.

A. I don't know.

Q. Do you know one way or the other whether or not any of the

ads that you went over with us on the stand on Thursday and

Friday are actually charged in the indictment?

A. I don't know.

Q. So if we can pull up just for your own ability to see what

I'm calling IM20, which is a screenshot of Exhibit 48 -- Strike

that.

It's a screenshot of Exhibit 489 at 37 seconds.

Sir, tell me if you recognize that as a screenshot

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 56 of 118
 56

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

from your video that you went over with us.

A. Yes.

MR. BIENERT: Your Honor, if we could please publish

what I'm calling IM20.

THE COURT: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) All right. So this is young, sexy TyTee

Time, and this is under the Sacramento escorts page, right?

A. Yes.

Q. It's someone who says her name is TyTee. Do you see that?

A. Yes.

Q. And it says on here -- Actually I'm not seeing what I

thought I'd see, so I may have gotten it wrong. The bottom

line is let's look at this ad. Sir, there is no offer of a sex

act involving touching the genitals of another in exchange for

money on this page, is there?

A. I do not see anything about touching genitals.

Q. And if you look at all these pictures on the right, what is

depicted in each of these pictures is something that if

somebody wanted to pay TyTee to come to their house, she could

in person do everything that's depicted in these pictures and

more for pay, right, and it wouldn't be prostitution?

A. No.

Q. Okay. So show me what's depicted in this picture that she

would not be able to do as an escort for pay in Sacramento

County and would equal prostitution.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 57 of 118
 57

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. It's just containing similar content, but nothing in it do

I see that crosses the line into prostitution.

Q. Right. This is a legal ad, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Let me rephrase it, Your Honor.

This is an ad that from your experience and training

you would not feel you could refer to a district attorney to

charge TyTee with prostitution. True?

A. Based on the ad alone?

Q. Right.

A. No.

Q. Let's go to the next ad, which I will call IM19, and it is

a screenshot from your Exhibit 489 at 53 seconds. And take a

look at that and let me know if you agree that's what it is.

A. Yes.

Q. And if we put this -- Publish it to the jury?

A. Yes.

Q. So this one is Exotic Ebony, is what she calls herself,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. And, first of all, you pointed out where it says up here

60QK special. Do you see that?

A. Yes.

Q. Top right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 58 of 118
 58

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

And you basically said, well, that's saying $60 for

some increment of time, right?

A. Based on other similar advertisements, yes, that's similar

content for money for a segment of time.

Q. Right. And, by the way, escorts, people who go out to

people's houses and get naked and do various things that are

short of prostitution, charge for their time, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And so do strippers, right?

A. I guess, yes.

Q. So do people who do these types of things at bachelor

parties, right?

A. Yes.

Q. In other words, the more money you pay, the more time you

get with that person, right?

A. Yes.

Q. For whatever's going on in that room. True?

A. For whatever's going on.

Q. In other words, whether it winds up being legal or not --

I'm trying not to give you an overly restrictive definition.

The point is whatever is going on in that room, whether it's

escort, other legal service, or, frankly, crossed into illegal

prostitution, all of those categories often charge for their

time and get paid for it, right?

A. Okay. Yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 59 of 118
 59

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Now, one of the things that you pointed out is these

pictures over here. First of all, none of these pictures are

illegal pictures, right? And when I say illegal, I mean

illegal to be on the Internet.

A. Unless they're underage.

Q. Okay. Let me say this. Every single thing I'm asking you

about deals with someone who is at least 18. Let's get that

out to be very clear. Okay. So thank you for the

clarification.

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: Well, so your statement is not that these

ads aren't children under 18, but your statement is that for

purposes of these questions? Is that what you're saying?

MR. BIENERT: Exactly, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Okay. So for purposes of these questions,

he's asking the witness to assume they're 18.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So for someone who is of legal age and

can give legal consent, none of these photos are illegal to

have on a website, on a classified website ad, right?

A. Not that I know of.

Q. And, by the way, one of the pictures which you called out,

far right in the middle right under I love my clients, is looks

like a person holding an adult toy, if I'm able to understand

what that is. Far right in the middle right there. Is that

what that looks like to you? Is that what you told us?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 60 of 118
 60

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. That's what it appears to be.

Q. And there's nothing illegal about someone posting a picture

of them with an adult toy, true?

A. Not that I know of.

Q. It also would not be prostitution in the State of

California if Exotic Ebony for pay came to my private house and

put on a show for me with an adult toy as long as I didn't

touch her genitals and she didn't touch mine, right?

A. I don't think so.

Q. It's not prostitution, is it?

A. No.

Q. If we can go to the next exhibit, which I'm going to call

IM22, and just for the witness to look at, and tell me if you

agree with me, sir, that this is a screenshot of your Exhibit

489 at the one minute and 14 second time frame.

A. Yes.

MR. BIENERT: So, Your Honor, if we could please

publish Exhibit IM22.

THE COURT: Yes.

THE CLERK: I'm sorry. I didn't hear you.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So this ad I'm going to call Gorgeous

Nubian, because that's what she calls herself, once again,

nothing about any of these photographs that indicates that they

are -- Strike that. Nothing about these photographs is illegal

to post on the Web, true?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 61 of 118
 61

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. True.

Q. And one thing that you did hone in on in this, do you

remember if we go over here and we have the area that says

seeking reviews, do you see that?

A. Yes.

Q. You specifically focused on that with Mr. Kozinets, who

highlighted it for you and asked you words to the effect of

what does that mean, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And you said, oh, that means they want to be reviewed, and

then you said on, for example, the Erotic Review? Isn't that

what you told us?

A. Yes.

Q. Why did you say the Erotic Review? It's not here, is it?

A. It's not where?

Q. In this ad.

A. It is not.

Q. There's no reference to the Erotic Review, right?

A. Not in the ad.

Q. And is there anything on this Gorgeous Nubian page that you

can press or anything that would get you to the Erotic Review?

A. Not that I see.

Q. So why did you choose the Erotic Review out of -- Let me

back up. The truth is there's a whole bunch of Web sites and

places one can go to review an escort, true?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 62 of 118
 62

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I assume.

Q. I mean, for example, there's AdultSearch.com and people who

are, quote, verified, right?

A. I don't know that one.

Q. There's EscortNoFakes.com that provides reviews of escorts,

right?

A. I don't know that one.

Q. StrippersToGo.com in Sacramento gives reviews of strippers

and adult workers, right?

A. I don't know. 

Q. How about Tumblr, whose description is make stuff, look at

stuff, talk about stuff, find your people? You can get an

Erotic Review there for escorts, right?

A. I don't know.

Q. How about the Yellow Pages? Is it true that one can go to

the Yellow Pages and look for reviews of escorts,

YellowPages.com?

A. I don't know.

Q. Reddit.com?

A. I don't know.

Q. And my wife's personal favorite for everything in the

world, Yelp? Is it true, sir, that I can go on Yelp and get a

review of escorts in Sacramento?

A. I don't know. They cover everything else. Maybe.

Q. You never looked, did you?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 63 of 118
 63

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. On Yelp?

Q. Right.

A. I don't recall.

Q. So I am trying to understand why of all the things that

could have come out of your mouth, the one thing that you said

was the Erotic Review, even though it's not on this page at

all?

A. Because that's one that I had looked at.

Q. And it's one that you looked at because you've worked with

these guys, who have told you that they want to make an issue

in this case of the Erotic Review, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Form. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) You understood from these guys that the

Erotic Review is something they want to talk about here, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Same objections.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I'm sorry. Overruled?

THE COURT: You can answer it, yes.

THE WITNESS: No. I knew of the Erotic Review before

I knew these gentlemen.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) My question is different. In your many

hours of discussions with people over here for the government,

one of the topics you discussed with them was the Erotic

Review, right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 64 of 118
 64

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. We did discuss the Erotic Review.

Q. You knew it would be part of the case that they'd put in

front of a jury here, right?

A. I don't know.

Q. But for whatever reason, out of all the things that do

review escorts, the only one that you cited was the Erotic

Review when you were being questioned, true?

A. I think I referenced Yelp, but -- 

Q. You referenced Yelp when he was questioning you on Friday?

A. I think it was like Yelp. I made a sim -- kind of an

example Erotic Review is like a Yelp.

Q. All right. Well, thank you.

A. If I remember correctly.

Q. All right. Let's go to what I'm calling IM23. And if you

can look at that and tell me if you agree that it is a

snapshot, a screenshot, of your Exhibit 489A at about the

120 -- one-minute-and-29-second time frame.

A. Yes.

MR. BIENERT: So, Your Honor, if we could please

publish?

THE COURT: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Thank you. So we can now all look at

this together.

So, once again, this one I'm going to call Jessica

because that is what she says, right? It says, hey, I'm

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 65 of 118
 65

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Jessica. Do you see that?

A. Yes.

Q. And if we look at these pictures, there is nothing illegal

about posting these pictures on the website, is there?

If we can just get to the pictures right now, we'll

come back to the text.

A. Again, if they're an adult, no.

Q. Assuming that this person is over 18, right, or 18 or over,

true?

A. True.

Q. Okay. And, by the way, just to be clear, Backpage chose to

try to get rid of nudity at different times, but the reality is

nude pictures can be posted in ads like this, true?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Form.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I assume. I don't know. I assume.

MR. BIENERT: Well --

THE WITNESS: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Is it true, sir, that if someone were

posting a classified ad just like this one, but the young, red

headed woman was buck naked, it would still be legal or --

strike that -- it would still in and of itself be something

that from your perspective you could not cite as illegal,

right?

A. Yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 66 of 118
 66

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. And in fact when one goes to what we'll call the personal

sections of a lot of these websites, there are really explicit

pictures with people naked and showing their privates, right?

A. I'm sorry. Say that one more time.

Q. Sure. When one goes to the personal section of something

like, for example, Tinder, there are explicit pictures of naked

people on the site, and that is not illegal to do as you

understand it?

A. I have not been on Tinder.

Q. Have you seen other websites where a woman can literally

post a naked picture of herself and -- excuse my language --

say do you want to fuck tonight?

A. Are there other websites like that? I'm sure there are.

Q. And the fact that some woman chooses on Tinder or otherwise

to post a picture like that of herself and say that does not in

and of itself make that an illegal ad, true?

A. Not that I know of.

Q. And, by the way, a naked picture of Jessica saying words to

the effect of I want to F tonight, that's not what these ads

show at all, is it?

A. Not in those words.

Q. Now, speaking of words, if we come over here to where it

says my ultimate goal, and we go down to ask about my two-girl

show, do you see that?

A. Yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 67 of 118
 67

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. "My ultimate goal is to give you the best experience you

deserve. I as well love to be pleased." It shows a tongue.

"Ask about my two-girl shows." Do you see that?

A. Yes.

Q. That, sir, in and of itself does not indicate that this ad

is for prostitution, does it?

A. That alone indicate it?

Q. Right, right.

A. Not alone.

Q. In fact, in California, according to the law that guides

these things, two women -- Let me back up.

I can pay two women to come to my house and have sex

with each other in front of me and please one another as long

as I, the payor, am not touching their genitals and neither of

them are touching mine, right?

A. I don't know for sure.

Q. But you're pretty sure I'm right, aren't you?

A. Probably.

Q. As a guy who has a badge and a gun who is given the ability

to go out and arrest people when you in good faith think they

have and you can prove that they've committed a crime, you

recognize that you wouldn't think you could arrest this young

woman for those activities with that alone, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 68 of 118
 68

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

THE WITNESS: Can you repeat it one more time?

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Sure. With this language here, which

flat out says I like to be pleased and shows a tongue and says

ask about my two-girl shows, you don't believe that is

sufficient to establish to you under the laws of California

that it is prostitution such that you could arrest her, right?

A. Based on this alone?

Q. Right.

A. No.

Q. Right. You need more than the ad, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And I'll take it a step further, sir. Is it true that in

California -- and I apologize for being graphic -- but not only

could Jessica and her friend have sex with each other and

pleasure one another while I am paying them, but I could touch

myself while they do it?

A. Probably.

Q. It's not prostitution, is it?

A. I don't think so.

Q. And the reason is because Jessica and her pleasurable

friend would not be touching my genitals, and I would not be

touching theirs? True?

A. If that's what was happening, yes.

Q. Right. And unless you're in the room with Jessica and her

friend for the two-girl show, you don't know one way or the

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 69 of 118
 69

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

other, do you?

A. No.

Q. Go to the next ad, IM24.

You take a look at this, sir, and tell me if you agree

that this is a screenshot of your Exhibit 489A at the

one-minute-and-58-second mark.

A. Yes.

MR. BIENERT: Your Honor, may we please publish IM24?

THE COURT: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Sexy Lexy is what she calls herself,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. Once again, nothing about the pictures that is illegal to

put on the Net, right?

A. No.

Q. It does not propose someone paying money for touching of

that person's genitals or letting that person touch them, does

it?

A. You mean are there pricing and timing commits like the

other ones? No. It does have a rose emoji, which I've seen in

other advertisements, indicates some sort of payment.

Q. Right. So this indicates payment, but it doesn't indicate

payment for touching the genitals of the person paying, does

it?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Form. Foundation.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 70 of 118
 70

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: No.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Now, one of the things that it says here,

if we look at it, it says in all capitals incalls only. Do you

see that?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, you were asked by Mr. Kozinets about this idea of

incalls and outcalls, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And incalls just means you come to me, you, the customer,

come to me, and outcalls mean I, the escort or whatever she is,

will go to you, right?

A. That's my understanding.

Q. And that term incalls and outcalls simply refers to whether

the professional goes to the client or vice versa, but that

term applies to people who are in the legal adult categories as

well, right?

A. It can.

Q. In other words, if my young 22-year-old -- and I'm not

saying he would do this -- were doing a bachelor party and were

hiring a legal adult services provider, he would talk to her

about whether she would be willing to do an outcall to come to

the place where the bachelor party's being held, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And the escort or person may say, okay, I'll do that, or

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 71 of 118
 71

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

they may say, like this one, "Nope. Incalls only. I don't go

to strange places. You need come to me." Right?

A. Yes.

Q. If we can go to the next exhibit, IM25.

THE COURT: Counsel, before you start the new exhibit,

we're going to take our morning recess. 

MR. BIENERT: Thank you, Your Honor.

THE COURT: So please remember the admonition, and

we'll come get you in about 20 minutes.

(The jury exited the courtroom at 10:40 a.m.)

THE COURT: Mr. Lincenberg, did you want to put

anything on the record about the side bar?

You guys can have a seat. I'm going to stand.

MR. LINCENBERG: Your Honor, not at this time, but

thank you for asking.

THE COURT: Okay. So we'll recess. And just so you

know, we'll probably go to 12:15 and take a 15-minute later

lunch. It will still be long enough. And then at the end of

the day, I think I want to talk about the motion -- I guess it

was the government's motion about the defense of reliance on

advice of an attorney. But we'll do that after the jury's done

for the day. We're at recess.

(Proceedings recessed from 10:42 a.m. until 11:04 a.m.

Proceedings in the presence of the jury:)

THE COURT: We are back on the record with the jury

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 72 of 118
 72

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

present. Mr. Bienert.

MR. BIENERT: Thank you, Your Honor. I just want to

make sure I can be heard from the microphone. Okay.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So, Agent Fichtner, we were just

finishing up with Sexy Lexy, and we talked about the incalls.

So we will now move to the next exhibit, which is IM25, if we

can put that up on the screen just for Agent Fichtner. And,

sir, look at it and tell me if you agree that it is a still

shot from your Exhibit 489 at two minutes and ten seconds.

A. Yes.

MR. BIENERT: Your Honor, I'd ask if we can publish

IM25.

THE COURT: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) All right. So here we are looking again

at a lady who calls herself exotic bootylicious blonde Shyla

James. So this is Shyla, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And, again, Shyla is fully clothed. There's nothing about

these pictures that is illegal to have on the Web, right?

A. I don't know if she's fully clothed, but nothing in the

pictures themselves are illegal.

Q. Okay. And there's nothing in the language that says an

offer of a prohibited sex act, namely, touching the genitals of

another who is paying them, true?

A. Nothing directly saying that.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 73 of 118
 73

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Right. Those words aren't there, are they?

A. Those words are not there.

Q. Now, there is a -- interestingly, she calls herself bronzed

kissed. Do you see that at the top?

A. Yes.

Q. And while she seems to be talking about her complexion,

let's talk about that. It is not prostitution for an escort

who is paid to kiss the payor, is it, on the lips?

A. I don't know.

Q. Well, it's not touching the genitals. You do know that,

right?

A. Is it for sexual gratification? I don't know.

Q. And that goes back to the fact that as you sit here now,

your testimony is you don't know enough about the California

prostitution laws to tell us whether they are limited to

touching the genitals or not, do you?

A. I don't know the full verbiage and legal definition behind

the prostitution. I am not an attorney.

Q. No. But you're somebody who goes out and arrests people

with a badge and a gun based on those laws, right?

A. Based on probable cause, correct.

Q. To violate a law, right?

A. Correct.

Q. You're certainly not suggesting that in your job as a

supervisory special agent, you would need to be an attorney to

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 74 of 118
 74

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

have in mind what the elements are you need to arrest someone?

A. If they negotiate or engage in or solicit and commit an

overt act, yes.

Q. An overt act of touching someone's genitals for the purpose

of sexual gratification, right? 

A. I'm not sure it's only limited to that.

Q. Because you just don't know, do you?

A. I don't think it is.

Q. Okay. And the good news is we have a judge, and we will

get instruction on what the law is, right?

A. I'm sure the judge knows.

Q. And if it turns out that you're wrong -- Let me ask you

this. Have you been laboring all of these years since 2015 in

doing your job, has it been your view that you could go out and

actually arrest someone for kissing for pay?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, have you ever sought a prostitution

charge based on someone offering to kiss someone in exchange

for money?

A. On that alone, no.

Q. By the way, speaking of the rules, you said to us, if I'm

following this, I presented you with the Sacramento city rules

that apply to escort, and you said you're only familiar with

the Sacramento County rules? Did I hear you right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 75 of 118
 75

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I was not familiar with the Sacramento city rules, correct.

Q. But you told us you were familiar with the Sacramento

County rules, right?

A. Somewhat, yes.

Q. Sir, is it true that Sacramento County doesn't have rules

about escorts? They don't regulate escorts, does it?

A. That's not my understanding.

Q. Well, let me ask it to you very directly. When you sat

here under oath and you told us you were familiar with the

Sacramento County rules on escorts, what rules did you have in

mind?

A. The exact, like, code section?

Q. How about where could I go on the Internet and type in and

see those rules?

A. It's on their county website.

Q. And it is your testimony that Sacramento County has

specific rules that define the contours of escort and adult

services and the like?

A. It was explained to me when I had contacted the county that

they were in need of a special license, and they kind of

described the process of getting that license.

Q. Okay. So you have never looked at the rules yourself?

A. No.

Q. And what you're saying is someone who happened to work for

the county, which, by the way, is called Sacramento County,

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 76 of 118
 76

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

right?

A. Correct.

Q. Sacramento's one of those unusual jurisdictions where the

county and the city have the same name?

A. Correct.

Q. And so somebody who you believe was a county employee told

you what they believed were the laws relating to escort, right?

A. I don't know if it was the law as much as it was the

process --

Q. The process.

A. -- to get a license for an escort.

Q. But they never represented to you that those were county

rules versus, for example, city rules, did they?

A. Yes, because I asked them if it was the same for the city,

and they said they did not know because they work for the

county.

Q. So just so I'm clear, all that testimony that you gave

about what you did or didn't understand about the Sacramento

County or city rules regulating to escorts, all of that was

just told to you by someone else without you even looking at

it, right?

A. It was explained to me, yes.

Q. So you don't even have personal knowledge of eyeballing the

rules, do you?

A. For an escort?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 77 of 118
 77

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Yeah.

A. No. I did not enforce escort code.

Q. Or for an adult performer?

A. I do not enforce adult performers.

Q. Or for a sensual massage artist?

A. I do not.

Q. And, frankly, even for a prostitute, right?

A. What do you mean?

Q. You never looked up what it means under California law to

engage in a lewd act? 

A. The legal definition under California law?

Q. Yeah.

A. I mean, I looked up the definition of a lewd act, but was

it described under a California legal document? I don't know.

Q. Well, I'm a little confused, because I thought you said you

didn't know the definition. So since you looked it up, I'm

going to go back and ask you what I tried to ask you a couple

hours ago.

Is it true, sir, that the California law defining a

lewd act says it must be genitals, buttocks, female breast that

come in contact with some part of the body of the other for the

purpose of sexual arousal or gratification of the customer or

the prostitute?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection, foundation, and just what

was raised previously.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 78 of 118
 78

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

MR. BIENERT: He just gave the exact opposite answer.

He just said he did look at it.

THE COURT: Mr. Bienert, there's no argument. The

objection's overruled.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So let's go back to two hours ago. So

you did look at what the definition is of a lewd act in

California, right?

A. Under a legal document, no. I said that.

Q. Why don't you tell us all, so we're clear, where is it that

you looked at something defining what a lewd act is under

California law to equal what California law says is

prostitution.

A. I don't know exactly or remember exactly where the

definition came from, but I don't personally recall the

verbiage of the California law. But if that's what you read,

then that's what it is.

Q. Right. Genitals. Correct?

A. If that's -- I think it said other than that.

MR. KOZINETS: Just objection, foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) The bottom line, sir, is none of us in

this room should ever think that you're somebody we should be

relying on for what the law is or isn't in California about

prostitution, true?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 79 of 118
 79

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) All right. Let's go back to beautiful,

exotic Shyla James and the question that started this. Is it

true, sir, then given what you've just clarified for us, you do

not know that the California -- whether California law makes it

illegal for an escort, who could be naked as a jaybird, to kiss

someone on the lips for money, do you?

A. I need more than that probably.

Q. Next we go to IM26, and if you can look at that and tell me

if you recognize it as a screenshot from your Exhibit 489 video

at two minutes and 37 seconds.

A. Yes.

MR. BIENERT: And, Your Honor, if we can please

publish that.

THE COURT: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So this is Katelynn, who is running

specials, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And basically, once again, there's nothing in these

photographs that is illegal to post on a website photograph, is

there?

A. Not alone, no.

Q. And there's nothing in this language where it says money in

exchange for touching of the genitals of the payor or letting

the payor touch her genitals, is there?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 80 of 118
 80

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. Not those words, no.

Q. In fact, she talks about being the, quote, perfect

companion, right?

A. She does say perfect companion.

Q. Let's go ahead and keep up number 26 or, I should say,

IM26, this picture. And if we can just go to the overall ad,

the overall ad of Katelynn. How old is Katelynn?

A. I do not know.

Q. Well, what's your estimate?

A. I try not to guess by pictures. I do not know.

Q. Because you can't tell from a picture unless it's someone

who is clearly a prepubescent child, right?

A. There's a difference between prepubescent and these

pictures, yes.

Q. And every single photograph you went over with us is

someone who at least biologically -- and we've only seen, I

think, photos of women that I can recall -- biologically a

mature, developed woman, right?

A. Of the ones we've gone over so far?

Q. Yeah.

A. It appears to be that way. I do not know though.

Q. And, by the way, I'm not hiding anything, am I? I just put

up the very ones that you chose to show us Thursday and Friday,

right?

A. These are the ones from my video, yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 81 of 118
 81

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. That you highlighted and took time to talk to us about,

correct?

A. They were highlighted, and we talked about them, yes.

Q. All right. So you can't tell us how old Katelynn is.

Let's go to D25 or IM25.

This photograph is Shyla. If we can Zoom in on the

photos, how old is Shyla?

A. I do not know.

Q. Next we'll go to -- You certainly can't say that this is

someone under 18, can you?

A. I don't even know if that's Shyla.

Q. Right. But all -- Because they often don't give their real

name, right?

A. Probably, yes.

Q. In fact, what you know from your experience is most of

these stage performers who go out and do adult stuff don't even

use their real name, right?

A. That's my guess.

Q. Which is why it's really helpful to have something where

you can get their credit card, their e-mail address, and other

identifying things that go beyond someone's stage name, true?

A. Yes.

Q. Let's go to D -- I'm sorry -- IM 24. Look at the picture.

Tell me how old Sexy Lexy is.

A. I do not know.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 82 of 118
 82

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Well, you haven't even looked, but you don't need to,

right?

A. I'm looking at it.

Q. Oh, there you go. Right. You don't know how old Sexy Lexy

is, right?

A. I do not.

Q. And she's even got her face covered, so we have no idea

what her face even looks like, true?

A. Correct.

Q. Go to IM22, Gorgeous Nubian. Tell me how old she is.

A. I do not know or if that's Gorgeous Nubian.

Q. That's the name attributed to her, right?

A. If that's her in the pictures.

Q. Right. That's another thing. In your understanding, you

have learned by being a cagey, supervisory, experienced

investigator, a lot of times people use photos that aren't even

theirs, right?

A. Yes.

Q. I mean, guys that look like me, when I go online, I make

myself look a lot better than I really do, right? That's your

experience?

A. They do.

Q. Nobody's in the market for a short, bald guy from the

south, right? That's not a selling feature?

A. Right. They want a young one.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 83 of 118
 83

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Exactly. I'd look like Fabio with flaming hair and all

that. Right? That's how it works? Right?

A. It can.

Q. So when you were looking at a photo, and you were sitting

there, and your whole job is to look at thousands and thousands

and thousands of photos to moderate them, what you do is you

look at the photo, and you do the best you can to make an

educated, considerate, good faith judgment, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Foundation. Form. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So let's assume for the sake of argument

that Gorgeous Nubian really is the person in this picture. You

don't know how old she is, right?

A. I do not.

Q. Go to IM19. Tell me if you know how old Exotic Ebony is.

A. I do not.

Q. Let's go to Exhibit IM20. Tell me if you know how old

TyTee is.

A. I do not.

Q. By the way -- And, by the way, all of these people say that

they're over 18 in these ads, right?

A. They've entered an age over 18, yes.

Q. And you agree that no one looking at this picture can

determine that they're under 18, right?

A. If that's them in the picture.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 84 of 118
 84

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Right. Based on the picture, you would not look at these

and say that's someone who I can establish is under 18, true?

A. Correct.

Q. By the way, let's look at Exhibit 490D, which is the

government's ad, your ad. We can pull that up. It's in

evidence. It's in evidence, if we could publish that, sir.

This is your photo, right?

A. Yes.

Q. How old is Tera, is the name she uses? Do you know?

A. This is a fictitious ad.

Q. My question is can you look at that picture and say how old

she is?

A. It's a fictitious ad. It's -- It's not related to the age.

I'm not going to give you the age of the undercover agent.

Q. I'm not asking you that, sir. I'm asking you can you look

at that photo, looking at it alone, and tell how old this

person in the picture is?

A. This person here? No.

Q. Okay. And I want to be clear I do not want anybody's

identity. Let me be very clear. But I'm just curious is this

someone that you actually know, or is this just an ad that you

got from somewhere?

A. Someone we know.

Q. Okay. Let me ask you a question. Where are the ads? You

went over hundreds of ads with us, all from Backpage, right,

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 85 of 118
 85

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

when you were on direct, looked at page after page after page

from March 5th, right, and then we had a whole other series

from September 8, right?

A. Correct.

Q. Hundreds of ads, true?

A. True.

Q. Where are the ones that say I will have intercourse, oral

sex, touch your genitals for money?

A. Those words?

Q. Yeah.

A. Not in those words.

Q. None of them have that, right?

A. Not in those words.

Q. And you were looking for it, true?

A. Sure. We were reading the ads. 

Q. If you saw it, you would have highlighted it for us, right?

A. Those words? 

Q. Yeah.

A. Yes.

Q. And, by the way, there are websites that have those words,

right, not Backpage but others?

A. I would assume so, yeah.

Q. Well, I don't want you to assume. Have you ever seen other

websites that have those words in them, like, on their face, no

bones about it, offer of a sex act involving genitals of the

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 86 of 118
 86

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

other person for money?

A. Yes.

Q. But not on Backpage, right?

A. Not in those words.

Q. Now, you understood that Backpage actually did this thing

called moderation where they hired people to look at the ads to

try to screen for things, right?

A. That was explained to me by Ms. McDougall.

Q. When you talked to her, right?

A. Correct.

Q. And, by the way, let's talk about that. So let me

understand this. You're doing an investigation, and you call

this company, and you get two people that actually talk to you,

and one is the Chief Executive Officer of the company, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And one is the general counsel, in-house lawyer for the

company, right?

A. Yes.

Q. Have you ever called any other adult services websites or

businesses with a question or a concern and been able to

immediately get the CEO to discuss it with?

A. I never tried.

Q. Have you ever called any other adult services website and

been able to get the general counsel within a few hours' notice

to talk to you about your concerns?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 87 of 118
 87

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I never tried.

Q. But you were even surprised that you were able to literally

get the CEO when you called him directly, right? You didn't

expect that?

A. That he would answer?

Q. Yeah.

A. I don't know. I had his phone number. I assume he would

answer.

Q. Well, you certainly didn't walk away thinking that guy

wasn't responsive, did you?

A. No. He was responsive.

Q. And you also learned in your investigation that Backpage's

moderation efforts worked. They actually found things that

they would not allow, right?

A. I wouldn't categorize that they worked.

Q. All right. Well, you spent a lot of time talking about the

ads you went over with us in your initial undercover, but as

was alluded to briefly, you did a second ad later where you

tried to post a more explicit ad on Backpage, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And you actually used a dirty word in this one, true?

A. Yes.

Q. We'll call it -- Well, let's not mince words. The word

that you typed in in your other ad was -- get a bigger marker

here -- was c-u-m, right, cum?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 88 of 118
 88

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. Yes.

Q. I guess it's not on the list of George Carlin Dirty Words

7, but that's affiliated with a sex act and, frankly, a man's

ejaculation, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And when you type that in and you try to do an ad at

Backpage with this I'll call it an explicit word, it wouldn't

let you type the ad, right, wouldn't let it accept the ad?

A. Yes. I was expecting them to cut me out, but they didn't.

They just had me change the word.

Q. Well, and then you changed it again, and you said, hah,

let's fool the computer or the moderators, and you added an M,

so now you had cumm, c-u-m-m, right?

A. Yes. And I received a response that said oops.

Q. Right, can't do it. That oops conveyed to you that you

were not allowed to post an ad with this language, right?

A. Yes. I was waiting for them to block me out, but it

didn't.

MR. BIENERT: Your Honor, asked and answered. Yes or

no. He's giving a speech. It's inappropriate. I'd move to

strike.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) So you couldn't get in with the variance

of c-u-m or c-u-m-m, so you wound up writing the general

language word c-o-m-e, right, which has multiple meanings,

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 89 of 118
 89

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

right?

A. Yes. It allowed me to correct it to come, c-o-m-e.

Q. So Backpage was engaging, in your own experience, in

moderation of some sort where there was some screening so that

the ads couldn't say just anything you wanted, true?

A. Yes. As Ms. McDougall explained, there were a list of

forbidden words.

Q. Have you ever heard the term GFE?

A. Yes.

Q. What does that mean in your experience?

A. Girlfriend experience.

Q. Now, first of all, that really means someone who is willing

to kiss on an escort or adult date or whatever type of activity

is going on, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: Well, that objection's overruled. You can

answer.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Do you even know? Let me back up. Do

you know what GFE means and what the significance is or isn't

in this sort of adult ad world?

A. I think it's open to interpretation. So is there one

meaning behind it? I don't know.

Q. So it's a vague word that could be suggestive of something

illegal but also could be something not illegal, right?

A. In this content or context with these advertisements, it's

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 90 of 118
 90

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

associated with -- it's terminology, I guess, amongst

prostitution and sex trafficking, yes.

Q. It's also among escorts meaning they'll act like your

girlfriend and kiss you, right?

A. You mean do they use the GFE acronym?

Q. Yeah.

A. I don't know.

Q. Okay. But what you do know is you went through all of

these ads on the March 6, 2015, video. You didn't see a single

one that had that term GFE, did you?

A. I think that term was in a response to an ad.

Q. You say in a response to an ad. What does that mean?

Explain.

A. One of the undercover ads that we posted, I think we had

that in a response. When we posted the ad, somebody responded

to the ad utilizing that acronym.

Q. Right. In other words, when you say someone, you mean

someone that had nothing to do with Backpage, someone who was

not at Backpage?

A. Right. Somebody replying to the ad.

Q. Right. So you put out an ad that didn't have the term, and

among the many replies -- and I assume we're going to hear from

your colleague -- it didn't have -- Someone may have used it,

but it wasn't Backpage that had that term in their ad in your

March 6, 2015, video, right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 91 of 118
 91

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I don't know if it was in there or not. I guess I hadn't

read every single ad, so I did not see it.

Q. Had you seen it, you would have pointed it out for us,

right?

A. Yes.

Q. And you didn't point it out for us, right?

A. Correct.

Q. Sir, you do know, though, that -- Let me back up.

You did two basically undercover videos involving

Backpage. You did a we'll call it 3-5-16 video, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And then you did a --

A. I'm sorry. 2015.

Q. Oh, my mistake. '15. And then you did a 9-8-2015 video,

right?

A. Correct.

Q. And what you observed for us and what you showed us is

somewhere in between March 5th, 2015, and September 8th, 2015,

there were changes made to the website, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And among the changes were it started putting in videos

that hadn't been there before, right?

A. Correct.

Q. And it had a section called gallery that had not been there

before, right?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 92 of 118
 92

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

A. I think gallery was there. I think it was date, video and

date.

Q. And the videos that were on there and the pictures, there

were many more that were explicit than you had seen in the

March 5th one, true?

A. Yes.

Q. Well, sir, is it true that between these two dates Backpage

was sold to Carl Ferrer in April of 2015, right?

A. I don't know exactly when and how it was sold.

Q. But you do know it was sold by the defendants to Carl

Ferrer sometime in that time frame?

A. It's my understanding. I just don't know details of it.

Q. Okay. You never arrested any of the ladies in the photos

that you showed us for prostitution, did you?

A. In the video that I recorded?

Q. Correct.

A. I did not arrest any of those people in those pictures.

Q. Nor did you ever submit to the DA's or the county or the

state office where you work to charge anyone, based on those

videos, any of the people in the videos to charge them for

prostitution, right?

A. Nobody in those videos. You're talking about the video

view?

Q. Well, basically everything --

A. From September 8th.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 93 of 118
 93

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Or March 6th?

A. No.

Q. No arrests of any of those folks, right?

A. No.

Q. Now, let's go back to the codes, city or county. Is it

true, sir, that the codes not only talk about the services that

can be allowed if one wanted to go down to see the police chief

or the county officials and say I'm an adult worker, and I'm

going to pay my fee, but they actually, in the same section,

they explain the legislative purpose, in other words, the

reason why those codes are written the way they are? There's a

legislative purpose to the codes, right, the Sacramento we'll

call them adult services rules?

A. If you say so. I don't know.

Q. You have no idea? I'm just trying to understand.

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Argumentative.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I do not know.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) Well, were you aware, sir, that those

codes explicitly say why they allow the adult services

mentioned, and they say that it is to make sure that they don't

restrict or deny access by adults to adult entertainment

business products or adult entertainment conduct protected by

the First Amendment? Had you heard that?

A. I heard you read it, yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 94 of 118
 94

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - CROSS

Q. Well, when you were getting your non-personal but

explanation of how the escort stuff worked from somebody at the

county office, did that person explain to you that the reason

the office was engaged with people who were escorts and adult

services folks and the others legally is because the First

Amendment allowed it?

A. They didn't say that, but it sounds like it.

Q. Did you ever ask them, gee, is this expression in words,

can the First Amendment apply here?

A. For escorts?

Q. Yeah.

A. No.

Q. You don't dispute that everyone has First Amendment

protections, from your perspective, even if they're in the

adult business, right?

A. Everybody has a First Amendment right.

Q. By the way, let's take that to the extreme. I, Tom

Bienert, hypothetically am a prostitute. It's how I've made my

living. I'm a poor man, but I try. I, in your understanding,

have the same First Amendment protections as you, a law abiding

law enforcement citizen, when it comes to legal adult

activities, right?

MR. KOZINETS: Objection. Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. BIENERT) The truth is, sir, you didn't refer a

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 95 of 118
 95

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

single person in any of these ads to any DA, law enforcement

colleague, or anyone else because you knew and believed in

good faith, because you're a good faith officer, that based on

these ads, they did not give you probable cause to arrest

anyone for prostitution, right?

A. We did not investigate those ads at that level, no.

MR. BIENERT: That's all I have. Thank you, sir.

THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Feder, do you have any

follow-up or additional questions for this witness?

MR. FEDER: I do not. Thank you.

THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Lincenberg?

MR. LINCENBERG: No, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Mr. Eisenberg?

MR. EISENBERG: No, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Ms. Bertrand?

MS. BERTRAND: No, Your Honor. Thank you.

THE COURT: All right. Redirect.

REDIRECT EXAMINATION 

BY MR. KOZINETS: 

Q. Good morning, Agent Fichtner.

A. Good morning.

Q. Or I should say Special Agent Supervisor.

I have put back on the screen Exhibit 489A, previously

admitted, fast forwarded to minute 11 and 41 seconds.

And I request that it be published. Thank you.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 96 of 118
 96

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

Special Agent Supervisor Fichtner, I'm showing you the

undercover escort ad that we discussed during your direct

examination. Do you see that there?

A. Yes, I do.

Q. And that ad didn't come out and expressly say I will

have -- I will exchange sexual favors with you for a hundred

bucks?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Leading, Your Honor.

(Reporter interrupted for clarification.)

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

Who said that?

MR. BIENERT: I did. Mr. Bienert.

THE COURT: Mr. Bienert.

You can answer. Sorry.

THE WITNESS: No, it did not.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) But when you crafted your ad, you had in

mind incorporating many common elements of ads you had reviewed

on Backpage's adult escort section?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. And so let's just take a look at the text of the ad for a

second.

You incorporated language of a proposition or a

come-on?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. Language like I'll make your dreams come true?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 97 of 118
 97

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

A. Correct.

Q. And you'll leave with a smile?

A. Yes.

Q. You incorporated text into your ad with catch phrases that

you had observed as commonly appearing on these Backpage adult

escort ads?

A. Yes.

Q. Catch phrases like I'm in town for a short time?

A. Yes.

Q. By the way, if an escort were moving around from town to

town to town, under California law, wouldn't they be required

to be licensed wherever they were offering their services?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. First of all, it's leading,

but it's speculative and calls for a legal conclusion without a

foundation from him.

MR. KOZINETS: Well, certainly within Sacramento

County -- I'm sorry, Your Honor.

THE COURT: The objection is sustained. You can

rephrase it.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Certainly within Sacramento County,

based on, as far as you know, an escort would need to be

licensed to offer their services there?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Foundation.

THE WITNESS: Yes.

THE COURT: As to that question, the objection's

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 98 of 118
 98

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

overruled.

THE WITNESS: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) So if they were only in town for a short

time, they'd have to run off to the authorities and undergo a

background check, get fingerprinted, prove whatever their age

is, and do whatever else they need to do in order to get an

escort license?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Leading.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) If they were only in town for a short

time and they were holding themselves out as an escort, would

they need to get a license in order to be a lawful licensed

escort in that area?

A. Yes.

Q. So going back to the language here, you incorporated other

catch phrases, right, like this one, 100 percent independent?

A. Yes.

Q. I'm clean and safe?

A. Yes.

Q. And, to the customer, please be clean and polite?

A. Yes.

Q. You have this phrase here real pic?

A. Yes.

Q. Again, something you saw come up very frequently in these

types of ads?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 99 of 118
 99

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

A. Yes. This advertisement is consistent with many other

advertisements that I viewed.

Q. And then you had pricing?

A. Yes.

Q. Pricing tied to specific time increments?

A. Yes. Again, similar to many other advertisements.

Q. And not just any kind of time increments but short time

increments?

A. Yes. 30 minutes and one hour.

Q. You included an image with the ad?

A. Yes.

Q. How would you describe this image? What is this person

wearing?

A. Lingerie.

Q. Kind of maybe something that might be called a bustier, for

instance?

A. Yes.

Q. And so with all of these elements, you took this ad, and

you placed it in the Backpage escort section?

A. Correct.

Q. You sort of put it into the stream of all the other ads

that had similar common characteristics?

MR. BIENERT: All leading, Your Honor. Objection.

THE COURT: Who is it? Okay.

The objection's sustained.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 100 of 118
 100

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) You placed it in this escort section,

Backpage Sacramento adult escorts?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Leading.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Where did you place the ad?

A. In the adult escort section of the Sacramento region on

Backpage.com.

Q. And you testified previously that you incorporated these

common elements to make this ad seem like the other ads?

MR. BIENERT: Objection, leading, but also asked and

answered multiple times.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: Yes. I wanted to create it to fit in

with all the other ones, so basically used the other ones as a

template to create this one to make it fit in.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Now, we -- Counsel on Friday and to some

extent today talked about your discussions with Carl Ferrer and

Elizabeth McDougall in relation to this ad?

A. Yes.

Q. And can you remind us again the ad was live for how many

days?

A. Ten days.

Q. And in that period of time, there were a number of

responses to the ad?

MR. BIENERT: Objection, asked and answered, Your

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 101 of 118
 101

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

Honor, and leading.

THE COURT: I'm sorry. I couldn't hear the second

part.

MR. BIENERT: Leading.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) The ad -- Let me put it this way. You

spoke -- After you spoke to the CEO, what happened to the ad?

A. It was removed from the website.

Q. Until that time, though, what was the status of the ad?

A. It was running live for those ten days.

Q. During those -- While that ad, that one ad, was taken down,

did Backpage continue to sell similar ads?

A. Yes.

Q. And were similar volumes of ads sold along the lines of the

ads that we looked at on March 6, 2015?

A. Yes.

Q. So while that one ad was taken down, Backpage was selling

hundreds of similar ads on a daily basis?

MR. BIENERT: Objection, leading, already asked and

answered.

THE COURT: Is that you, Mr. Bienert?

MR. BIENERT: Yes. I'm sorry.

THE COURT: Maybe you could pull the microphone a

little bit closer. The objection to leading is sustained.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Was there any change in the volume of

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 102 of 118
 102

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

these similar types of ads that Backpage was selling over the

course of this ten-day period?

A. Not that I could tell.

Q. Did you, based on your experience, did you view Backpage as

helpful to law enforcement?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Relevance. Foundation.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I did not think they were helpful to law

enforcement.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Can you explain why?

MR. BIENERT: Same objections.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I think they were deceiving law

enforcement.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) How so?

A. I think --

MR. BIENERT: Same objections, Your Honor. Improper.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: I think as they promoted all the

different things on the website, cyber tip lines were reaching

out or responding, I think that was just a diversion for law

enforcement to think that they're helping us when they were

allowing everything else to go on and to enhance their website.

MR. BIENERT: Objection.

THE WITNESS: So although they may have helped me with

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 103 of 118
 103

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

this one advertisement in that 27-hour span, which was 300

advertisements, they might have helped me with one, but the

other 299 were still going on.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) And that continued -- 

MR. BIENERT: Objection. No foundation. Move to

strike about all the other ads.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) And that continued day in, day out, over

the course of 2015?

MS. BERTRAND: Objection. Goes beyond the scope of

cross.

THE COURT: Ms. Vaught. The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) There was some discussion during some

part of cross-examination about the posting rules for the

escort section of Backpage. And my question to you is were the

posting rules the same in September -- on September 8th, 2015,

as they were on March 6, 2015?

A. I believe so, yes.

Q. So, among other things, you couldn't, according to the

posting rules, post nude images, genitalia, simulated sex acts,

and similar types of images?

A. Correct.

Q. And you couldn't indirect or coded fashion advertise for

any illegal service, including, as stated in the posting rules,

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 104 of 118
 104

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

the exchange of sexual favors for money or other valuable

consideration?

THE WITNESS: Correct.

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Leading. Asked and

answered.

THE COURT: The objection to leading is sustained.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Special Agent Supervisor Fichtner,

rewound Exhibit 849A to 5 minutes 14 seconds. Do you see that

part of the video exhibit?

A. Yes, I do.

Q. And what part of the video exhibit is this in?

A. This is the -- These are the posting rules.

Q. And I'd like to direct your attention to the -- We talked

about the first bullet point already. I'd like to direct your

attention to the second bullet point. Can you just read that

one please.

A. It says, "I will not post any solicitation directly or in

coded fashion for any illegal service, including exchanging

sexual favors for money or other valuable consideration."

Q. And these rules, including these two bullet points, were

the same on March 6, 2015, as they were in September 8th, 2015?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Leading and foundation.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Were they --

THE COURT: The objection's is overruled.

THE WITNESS: Yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 105 of 118
 105

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) There was some discussion about

California DOJ, your department, the California Department of

Justice, investigating Backpage. There were a list of other

sites were mentioned. Do you recall that?

A. Yes.

Q. And you were specifically investigating Backpage?

A. Yes.

Q. And why were you specifically investigating Backpage?

MR. BIENERT: Objection, Your Honor. Relevance.

Calls for narrative.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) We talked about how you had formed an

understanding as to why your agency was investigating Backpage?

A. Yes.

Q. Had your agency received complaints about Backpage?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Foundation. Hearsay.

Relevance. It calls for a conclusion.

THE COURT: It's a yes or no question. You can answer

yes or no. The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: Yes.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Do you know if that played a role in

your agency's decision to investigate Backpage?

MR. BIENERT: All the objections before, Your Honor.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled. Yes or no.

THE WITNESS: Yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 106 of 118
 106

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) What were the nature of those

complaints?

MR. BIENERT: Same objections, Your Honor.

THE COURT: The objection's sustained.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) I want to talk about the issue of age

verification that counsel brought up. What were the age

verification or were there any age verification requirements

before one could put up an escort ad on Backpage?

A. There were no requirements.

Q. So just to be clear, any sort of requirement at all to show

proof of age?

A. I did not encounter any type of verification of the age

that I was posting.

Q. Any sort of driver's license check or anything like that?

A. No.

Q. Was there any kind of in-person verification of the

person's age?

A. No.

Q. So was there any way of knowing with any certainty how old

somebody was who was being featured in one of these

advertisements?

A. No.

Q. Special Agent Supervisor Fichtner, I'm directing your

attention to one of the ads that we've been discussing.

This is at the one-minute-35 mark of Exhibit 0489A.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 107 of 118
 107

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

Do you see that ad here?

A. Yes.

Q. The ad has pricing increments?

A. Yes.

Q. Talks about hooking up?

A. Yes.

Q. And what is this portion here?

A. It says, "I as well love to be pleased" with a tongue and a

splash emoji.

Q. I'm now showing you another one of these ads. This is from

the two-minute-two-second mark of Exhibit 489A. Do you see

that on your screen?

A. Yes.

Q. This has that new in town language?

A. Yes.

Q. And it has the series of emojis here?

A. Yes.

Q. And, again, can you just sort of walk us through

descriptively what those emojis are.

A. The emojis, the first one is with an open mouth emoji.

Next one is a rose. The other one is a smiley face with heart

eyes and two splash emojis.

Q. I'm not going to go through every single one of these ads.

Again, we've already done that here. These ads and others that

you reviewed, is it your testimony that these are kind of

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 108 of 118
 108

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

typical of the types of ads that you had seen on the escort

section?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, counsel brought up this morning another ad that you

had crafted where you used the word cum spelled c-u-m. Do you

remember that?

A. Yes.

Q. And I think you explained that you had received some sort

of message when you tried to submit that ad?

A. I did. I received a response while posting it that said

oops, like I made a mistake, cum is a forbidden word in this

category.

Q. And what did you do after you got that message?

A. I went back, and I tried to correct it.

Q. And --

A. And I --

Q. How did you correct it?

A. I respelled it with c-u-m-m, and again I received the same

message, oops, c-u-m is a forbidden word in this category.

Q. And so how did you respond to that?

A. It allowed me to go back and correct it again, so I just

spelled it c-o-m-e, and then it accepted it.

Q. Did you around that same time review or see other ads on

the escort section that had variations of the word cum?

A. Yes.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 109 of 118
 109

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

Q. I want to go back to this discussion about escorts and the

definition of escorts that you had provided. Do you recall how

in your direct exam you testified generally that an escort is

someone who you can hire to spend time together with as long as

you're not breaking the law?

A. Correct.

Q. And so I would imagine if one were to engage in the

exchange of sexual favors for money or other valuable

consideration, that would be something that a lawful licensed

escort couldn't do?

MR. BIENERT: Objection, Your Honor, to blending

escort with the suggestion of prostitution on the legality

front.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled as to that

question.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Do you want me to ask it again?

A. Yes, please.

Q. So this sort of concept of lawful licensed escort also

involves the notion that you can't break the law; you can't

engage in the exchange of sexual favors for money?

MR. BIENERT: Objection, leading, but also improperly

blending a licensing requirement with legality.

THE COURT: Counsel, you can ask for a side bar.

MR. BIENERT: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: That objection's overruled.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 110 of 118
 110

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

MR. BIENERT: I'd ask for a side bar.

THE COURT: Okay. We'll do it later.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) In the process of posting an adult

escort ad on Backpage, the process that you went through, was

there ever a requirement where you had to establish that you

had an escort license in order to post the ad?

A. No.

Q. Did you ever see an escort license number in any of the

hundreds of escort ads that you had reviewed? 

MR. BIENERT: Objection, Your Honor, relevance to the

issue at trial.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: No.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Did you encounter licensed escorts in

your work in law enforcement?

MR. BIENERT: Same objection.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: No.

Q. (BY MR. KOZINETS) Special Agent Supervisor Fichtner, I'm

directing your attention to another part of the previously

admitted Exhibit 489A a minute or just 34 seconds into it.

Thank you for publishing. I want to direct your

attention to the second sponsor ad.

Was this ad always prominently displayed on the escort

section whenever you reviewed it in 2015?

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 111 of 118
 111

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

A. Yes, it was.

Q. Now, earlier you said I think it's appropriate to put this

on Backpage's website. Do you remember that?

A. Yes.

Q. Why did you say that?

MR. BIENERT: Objection. Relevance.

THE COURT: The objection's overruled.

THE WITNESS: Because this is where they advertised

for prostitution.

MR. KOZINETS: No further questions.

THE COURT: Are there any questions from the jury?

Okay.

There's one. And I apologize. After the first couple

witnesses, I didn't ask. If I ever forget to ask, just raise

your hand.

Counsel, can I see you at side bar?

(Bench conference on the record as follows:)

THE COURT: So this is jury question one. Why don't

you read it and then pass it.

MR. KOZINETS: I'm assuming this refers to the March,

his undercover ad that didn't repost.

MR. BIENERT: Should I --

THE COURT: One second.

MR. KOZINETS: Your mask.

THE COURT: Thank you. Okay. With respect to

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 112 of 118
 112

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

question one, what's the government's position?

MR. KOZINETS: The government -- This is Peter

Kozinets. The government understands the question relates to

the undercover sweet dreams ad in March of 2015. We don't have

an objection. I don't know what the, you know -- We don't have

an objection to the question.

MR. BIENERT: This is Mr. Bienert speaking. The

question on its face I think would be asking for a conclusion

about someone else's --

(Reporter interrupts for clarification.)

MR. BIENERT: This is Mr. Bienert. I think question

number one is asking this witness to talk about the mindset and

conclusions of a third party at Backpage, and therefore it's

not something he should be asking.

THE COURT: I agree with defense. This is the Judge.

So that question will not be asked.

Question two, Mr. Bienert.

MR. BIENERT: Yes. I object to this but for -- Given

the current status of things and the government's questioning,

I don't think this is an improper question. I will say as a

foundational matter this witness has repeatedly said, though,

that he does not know the answers to the escort rules, so I

think it's improper for him.

I will say and I want to get the witness done, but

after the witness is gone, I do want to address the Court about

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 113 of 118
 113

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FICHTNER - REDIRECT 

they very topic -- 

THE COURT: Yes.

MR. BIENERT: -- which is why I objected.

THE COURT: No. I have a note to talk about that.

What's the government's position?

MR. KOZINETS: I'm not sure that this witness has, you

know, if there's foundation for answering. It seems like a

question more for the Sacramento, you know, licensing

authorities.

THE COURT: So I don't think he does either, but I'm

going to ask him do you even know how many. 

MR. KOZINETS: Okay.

THE COURT: And then if he says no, then I'm not going

to ask anything further.

MR. KOZINETS: Okay.

(End of bench conference.)

THE COURT: Agent Fichtner, do you know how many

escort licenses were granted and registered in Sacramento

County at the time you did your search in March of 2015?

THE WITNESS: I do not.

THE COURT: Okay. All right. Then we're going to

recess for lunch, and we'll -- We're going to come back a

little bit later, so at 1:30. I have some other matters to

take care of, so I'm going to just ensure that I have enough

time to do that. So we'll come back at 1:30. Thank you.

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 114 of 118
 114

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

(The jury exited the courtroom at 12:14 p.m.)

THE COURT: You can step down, Agent Fichtner. All

right. You can have a seat. There's a couple things -- I just

want to make sure the door's shut. Okay. So there's a couple

things I want to put on the record as to two issues.

With respect to the questions about escorts and what

crossed the line, the defense had questioned this witness about

that very same thing, so I allowed the government to do it.

The second one was about whether or not Backpage was

helpful. The defense, again, talked about Carl Ferrer and his

response and him being responsive, so I allowed the follow-up

questions on that.

With respect to the exhibits, Elaine, did you get

numbers for those?

(The Court and clerk confer off the record.)

THE COURT: Okay. So she has given them numbers

because you were going to move to admit them after, so do you

want to do that?

MR. BIENERT: I do. And maybe just to make it

simpler -- because by now my pages are all shuffled -- if

perhaps I will just say the only ones I'm going to ask to admit

are the ones that were these still shots from his video. And

maybe I can get together with madam clerk either now or when we

come back in an hour and a half and show her what those numbers

were that I called out. And then I would just ask that they be

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 115 of 118
 115

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

exhibit numbers in the case.

MR. KOZINETS: That's fine with us, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Okay. So if you can come back at 1:25 and

go over those numbers with Elaine.

MR. BIENERT: Yes, Your Honor. I do want to address

the two points you made, and I can do it later, but at some

point I need to make a record on that.

THE COURT: Briefly, but go ahead.

MR. BIENERT: Here's my concern. First of all, yes, I

asked about the escort issue, but that's because Mr. Kozinets

in direct brought up the escort licensing issue. So my cross

was based on him bringing it up. And what I think he did was

improper, because what he did was he juxtaposed this concept of

prostitution with then discussing licensing for escorts, and he

did it in a way that suggested that if someone fails to get a

license, which obviously is a licensing issue, but it was

suggested that doing that somehow made their conduct illegal

such that that could make it prostitution.

And I believe that when he got up on redirect, he sort

of doubled down on that. And I think that the note that the

jurors gave us, which is more innocuous -- it's just how many

licenses are there -- I believe that the record now is one

where jurors could be wrongly thinking that someone's failure

to get an escort license somehow makes what would have been

legal business that an escort could do without being

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 116 of 118
 116

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

prostitution, somehow turns it into prostitution.

And so I think there is jury confusion that was

prompted by the government's blending these terms. And as I at

least tried to make in my driving without a license versus DUI

example, they're just apples and oranges. And whether I have

violated licensing rules does in no way, shape, or form show

whether I violated DUI rules, just like if an adult entertainer

fails to get a license, it doesn't tell you whether she is also

engaged in illegal prostitution.

THE COURT: All right. And that was abundantly clear

from your cross. And the opposite of that, which the

government went into, is just because they're licensed doesn't

mean what they're doing is legal. So I see it both ways.

MR. BIENERT: You know, Your Honor, I see where you're

going. I would agree with you if they established that anyone

was licensed. But what they seem to be doing is the opposite.

Their questioning, at least as I get it, is they're trying to

say none of these people appeared to be licensed; therefore

it's all bad. That's the issue.

THE COURT: Okay. I just disagree with -- The way you

perceived it is different than the way I perceived it. And

ultimately hopefully the jury -- I'm confident the jury can

distinguish the difference.

Okay. All right. I'll see you all at 1:30.

(Proceedings recessed at 12:19 p.m.)

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 117 of 118
 117

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

C E R T I F I C A T E

I, LINDA SCHROEDER, do hereby certify that I am duly

appointed and qualified to act as Official Court Reporter for

the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing pages constitute

a full, true, and accurate transcript of all of that portion of

the proceedings contained herein, had in the above-entitled

cause on the date specified therein, and that said transcript

was prepared under my direction and control.

DATED at Phoenix, Arizona, this 17th day of September, 

2021. 

 s/Linda Schroeder 

 Linda Schroeder, RDR, CRR 

 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-12 Filed 11/01/21 Page 118 of 118