alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15295]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710, of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gambling on 
Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Department 
of the Interior, through her delegated authority, has approved 
Amendment I to the Tribal-State Compact for Regulation of Class III 
Gaming Between The Klamath Tribes and the State of Oregon, which was 
executed on April 4, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George T. Skibine, Director, Indian Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of 
Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: June 7, 1996.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-15295 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
H. Res. 907 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2009. 

Whereas the Grand Concourse was designed by engineer 

Louis Aloys Risse beginning in 1894; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse opened in 1909; 

Whereas the 4-mile thoroughfare stretches from 138th Street 

to Van Cortland Park in the Bronx; 

Whereas Edgar Allan Poe wrote the poem ‘‘Annabel Lee’’ in 

his Bronx cottage which now stands on the Grand Concourse; 

Whereas Babe Ruth, Stanley Kubrick, Milton Berle, Penny 

and Garry Marshall, and E.L. Doctorow all at one time 

made their homes on the Grand Concourse; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse hosts such New York landmarks as Yankee Stadium, Loews Paradise Theater, and 

the Concourse Plaza Hotel; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse has the largest collection of 

Art Deco and Art Moderne buildings in the United 

States; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse is registered as a National 

Historic Place; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse has been designated as a special preservation district by the City of New York; 
2 

•HRES 907 EH 

Whereas the Grand Concourse is known as the Champs 

Elyse ́es of the Bronx; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse is the central north-south artery of the Bronx; 

Whereas the Concourse serves the 4, 5, B, and D subway 

lines as well as several bus routes and is a major transportation route in New York City; 

Whereas the $18,000,000 that was provided for the Grand 

Concourse in January 2006 led to improving the 

streetscape and creating better access for pedestrians; 

Whereas the Bronx Museum of the Arts is celebrating the 

roadway in its exhibition ‘‘Intersections: The Grand Concourse at 100’’; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse has seen the arrival of countless new immigrants as well as people arriving from other 

parts of the country, including Puerto Rico, and has been 

their launching point for the valuable contributions that 

they have made; 

Whereas the people of the Bronx enjoy spending time on the 

beautiful parks adjoining the Grand Concourse, making 

it a center for socializing and recreating; 

Whereas the Grand Concourse has fulfilled and exceeded its 

planners’ intentions over a series of generations, occupying a central place in the hearts and minds of 

Bronxites past and present; and 

Whereas the Grand Concourse since its inception has been an 

integral part of the cultural life and economic development of the Bronx: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
3 

•HRES 907 EH 

(1) recognizes the Grand Concourse on its 100th 

anniversary as the preeminent thoroughfare in the borough of the Bronx and an important nexus of commerce 

and culture for the City of New York; and 

(2) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a copy of this resolution to The Bronx 

County Historical Society located at 3309 Bainbridge 

Avenue, The Bronx, NY 10467, for appropriate display. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 04-0364

IN RE  PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., ET AL.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s emergency motion for stay, filed April 19, 2004, is granted.   The order dated March 8, 2004, in Cause No. 2001-49363, styled *Lexington Insurance Company v. Advanced Wirecloth, Inc., Environmental Procedures, Inc., Vincent D. Leone, Sr., Screen Manufacturing Company, Ltd., Tuboscope Vetco International, Inc., Tuboscope Vetco International, Ltd., Varco Canada, Ltd., Varco International, Inc., and Varco, L.P. v. Allianz International Insurance Company, Ltd., Et Al.*, in the 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real parties in interest are requested to respond to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., April 26, 2004.

Done at the City of Austin, this April 19, 2004.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1995 Rev., Supp. No. 18]

Survey Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds, American Alliance 
Insurance Company

    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal Bonds 
is hereby issued to the following company under Sections 9304 to 9308, 
Title 31, of the United States Code. Federal bond-approving officers 
should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 
1995 Revision, on page 34437 to reflect this addition:
    American Alliance Insurance Company. Business Address: 580 Walnut 
Street, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202. Phone: (513) 369-5000. Underwriting 
Limitation b/: $685,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, AK, AS,AZ, AR, CA, CO, 
CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, GU, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, 
MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, PR, RI, SC, SD, 
TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, VI, WA, WV, WI, WY. Incorporated in: Arizona.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR, Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    The Circular may be viewed or downloaded by calling the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, computerized 
public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 874-6817/7034/
6953/6872. A hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing 
Office (GPO), Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-0132. When ordering 
the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00489-0.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F04, Hyattsville, MD 20782, telephone (202) 874-7116.

    Dated: May 30, 1996.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 96-15073 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  this  amended   Quarterly  Report  of  SavWatt  USA,  Inc.
("Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Isaac
H. Sutton, President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: January 24, 2011                    /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Hannah Yampolsky, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States of America, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-00545-TUC-DCB 

ORDER 

The Court having been notified that this case has been settled by the parties, 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the case is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of the 

Court shall close it. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file the appropriate dismissal 

documents within 30 days of the filing of this Order. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction over this matter 

to reopen the case and return it to the Court's active docket, in the event problems arise in 

relation to its settlement. 

 Dated this 9th day of July, 2019.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6394

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, a/k/a Shorty , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , District Judge. ( 3:98

- cr - 00047

- 1; 3:00

- cv - 00647 )

Submitted : August 29 , 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

. Kelvin Andre Spotts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6394 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Kelvin Andre Spotts appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The court denied the petition on the merits but also construed the petition as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. On appeal, Spotts argues that the court incorrectly c onstrued his petition as a successive § 2255 motion because he is no longer “in custody.” See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (requiring movant to be “in custody”). Although Spotts was released from prison in November 2022, he is still serving his supervised

- release term. And a defendant serving his supervised

- release term is considered “in custody” for the purpose of § 2255. See United States v. Swaby , 855 F.3d 233, 239 (4th Cir. 2017). Because the more usual remedy is available, Spotts cannot seek relief through a coram nobis petition. See United States v. Lesane , 40 F.4th 191, 195

- 96 (4th Cir. 2022). Although the district court correctly characterized Spotts’ petition as a § 2255 motion, it incorrectly addressed the merits b ecause we had not authorized this suc cessive § 2255 motion

. Accordingly, although we affirm the district court’s judgment, we modify the order to reflect that the motion is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction

. See Ali v. Hogan , 26 F.4th 587, 600 (4th Cir. 2022) (explaining that “a dismissal for lack of standing

— or any other defect in subject matter jurisdiction

— must be one without prejudice” (cleaned up)). We also deny Spotts’ motion to expand the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6394 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### Ronald WALTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56032.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 12, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 17, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 13, 1990.

*782Mark T. McSweeney, Stormy B. White, Clayton, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant states he is entitled to an eviden-tiary hearing in that his lawyer failed to suppress a coerced confession thereby causing movant to plead guilty involuntarily-

Pursuant to plea negotiations, movant pled guilty to amended charges of second degree murder and first degree robbery on February 14, 1983. He admitted to taking part in the robbery of Mrs. Lillie E. Hilde-brandt in her Fenton home. The 85-year-old woman was brutally stomped and kicked about the face and chest until one of her ribs penetrated her heart causing her to bleed to death. Movant and his accomplice made off with approximately $10,000.

When movant entered his guilty plea, the effectiveness of counsel issue was relevant only to the extent that it related to the voluntariness of the plea. *Troupe v. State,*766 S.W.2d 722, 723[2] (Mo.App.1989).

His guilty plea constituted a waiver of his lawyer’s failure to suppress his confession. *Anderson v. State,*747 S.W.2d 281, 285[4] (Mo.App.1988). The remaining question is whether his guilty plea was voluntary. It was.

The motion court found and the record reveals movant understood he was pleading guilty because he was in fact guilty. Movant’s counsel advised him to plead guilty to avoid trial on a capital murder charge. Nowhere in his motion does he state that had his lawyer suppressed an allegedly coerced confession to the police, movant would have pled not guilty.

Judgment affirmed.

GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.
Exhibit 13.2









CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
China Southern Airlines Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xiao Li Xin, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











|Date: April
    28, 2016 | By:                            | /s/Xiao
Li Xin
|------------------------ | ------------------------------ | --------------
|                         | Name: Xiao Li Xin             
|                         | Title: Chief Financial Officer





* This certification accompanies the Report
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company") for the three month ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Seijin Ki, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 10, 2011





By: /s/ Seijin Ki


Seijin Ki


Chief Financial Officer







This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15804]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Determination Not to Revoke Countervailing Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Determination Not to Revoke Countervailing Duty 
Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is notifying the 
public of its determination not to revoke the countervailing duty order 
listed below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Albright or Cameron Cardozo, Office of Countervailing Compliance, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On March 28, 1996, the Department published in the Federal Register 
(61 FR 13847) its intent to revoke the countervailing duty order listed 
below. Under 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii), the Secretary of Commerce will 
conclude that an order is no longer of interest to interested parties 
and will revoke the order if no domestic interested party (as defined 
in sections 355.2(i)(3), (i)(4), (i)(5), and (i)(6) of the regulations) 
objects to revocation and no interested party requests an 
administrative review by the last day of the 5th anniversary month.
    Within the specified time frame, we received from a domestic 
interested party either an objection to our intent to revoke, or a 
request for administrative review, for this countervailing duty order. 
Therefore, because the requirements of 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii) have 
not been met, we will not revoke the order.
    This determination is in accordance with 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Countervailing duty order                                       
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peru:                                                                   
  Pompon Chrysanthemums (C-333-601)......  04/23/87                     
                                           52 FR 13491                  
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: June 12, 1996.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 96-15804 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
EXHIBIT
32.1








NET
TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 of NetTalk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Anastasios Kyriakides, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









/s/ Anastasios
      KyriakidesAnastasios
      KyriakidesChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
      February 12, 2010






33