alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

MARY HELEN COAL CORPORATION, a

Virginia Corporation,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MARTY D. HUDSON; MICHAEL H.

HOLLAND, Trustees of the United

Mine Workers of America

Combined Benefit Fund and

Trustees of the 1992 United Mine

Workers of America Benefit Plan;

No. 97-2331

THOMAS O. S. RAND; ELLIOTT A.

SEGAL; CARLTON R. SICKLES; GAIL R.

WILENSKY; WILLIAM P. HOBGOOD,

Trustees of the United Mine

Workers of America Combined

Benefit Fund; THOMAS F. CONNORS;

ROBERT WALLACE, Trustees of the

1992 United Mine Workers of

America Benefit Plan,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CA-97-71-3)

Argued: January 27, 1998

Decided: September 24, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________
Reversed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: Patrick Michael McSweeney, MCSWEENEY, BURTCH

& CRUMP, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Peter Buscemi,

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

ON BRIEF: William B. Ellis, John L. Marshall, Jr., MCSWEENEY,

BURTCH & CRUMP, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Robert H. Bork,

Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John Mills Barr, MORGAN,

LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C.; David W. Allen, Office of

the General Counsel, UMWA HEALTH & RETIREMENT FUNDS,

Washington, D.C.; John R. Mooney, MOONEY, GREEN, BAKER,

GIBSON & SAINDON, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Samuel M. Brock,

III, MAYS & VALENTINE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Mary Helen Coal Corporation ("Mary Helen") appeals a final order

of the district court granting summary judgment to the appellees on

Mary Helen's claim that the Coal Industry Retiree Benefit Act of

1992, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9701-9722, as applied to Mary Helen, violates the

Due Process and Takings Clauses of the Fifth Amendment. Following

briefing and oral argument, we ordered that the case be held in abeyance pending argument and decision by the Supreme Court in Eastern

Enters. v. Apfel, 118 S. Ct. 2131 (1998). On June 25, 1998, the

Supreme Court issued a decision in Eastern in which five Justices

agreed that the Coal Act was unconstitutional as applied to Eastern

Enterprises. Because the case at bar is materially indistinguishable

from Eastern, we grant Mary Helen's motion for summary reversal

 2
pursuant to Fourth Circuit Rule 27(g), and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings. Also outstanding are Mary Helen's

motion to strike portions of the appellees' brief, which is hereby

granted, and appellees' motion to supplement the record on appeal,

which is denied.

REVERSED

 3
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
 1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 
 2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andthe results of operations of the Company. 

Date:    April 3, 2019 

 

(signed) John E. Peck
John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and will beretained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933. 
**
##### 



Exhibit 12.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No.333-12140), (No.333-12142), (No.333-12124),
(No.333-13712), (No.333-81804) and (No.333-81805) of Amersham plc of our report
dated February 26, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Amersham plc, which appears in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2002.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
London, England

Date: 23 May, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

June 7, 1996.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1186.
    Form Number: IRS Form 8825.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Rental Real Estate Income and Expenses of a Partnership or 
an S Corporation.
    Description: Form 8825 is used to verify that partnerships and S 
corporations have correctly reported their income and expenses from 
rental real estate property. The form is filed with either Form 1065 or 
Form 1120S.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Farms.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 705,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

    Recordkeeping--6 hr., 28 min.
    Learning about the law or the form--28 min.
    Preparing the form--1 hr., 31 min.
    Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS--16 min.
    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 6,147,600 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-15106 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE



     The undersigned hereby certifies that she is the duly elected and acting
Assistant Treasurer of Southern California Edison Company, as servicer (the
"Servicer") under the Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of
December 11, 1997 (the "Servicing Agreement") between the Servicer and SCE
Funding LLC (the "Note Issuer") and further that:

1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the
     Servicing Agreement during the period from the date of the Servicing
     Agreement until June 30, 1998 has been made under the supervision of the
     undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

2.   To the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the
     Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations in all material
     respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period of time from
     the date of the Servicing Agreement until June 30, 1998, except for those
     material defaults in the fulfillment of material obligations listed on
     Annex A hereto.

Executed this 3oth day of September, 1998.


                                            SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY



                                            By: Mary Simpson
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Mary Simpson
                                                Assistant Treasurer


<PAGE>



                                     ANNEX A
                                       TO
                            CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

                            LIST OF SERVICER DEFAULTS



The following  material  defaults known to the undersigned occurred during the
period of time from the date of the Servicing Agreement until June 30, 1998:

Nature of Default                                               Status
-----------------                                               ------


None
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15102]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 4, 1996.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

SPECIAL REQUEST: In order to conduct the focus group interviews 
described below in early July 1996, the Department of Treasury is 
requesting that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and 
approve this information collection by June 17, 1996. To obtain a copy 
of this survey, please contact the IRS Clearance Officer at the address 
listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432
    Project Number: M:SP:V 96-014-G
    Type of Review: Revision
    Title:

    1. Tax Settlement Reengineering Project Enable Taxpayers to File 
and Provide Assistance Focus Group Interviews; and
    2. Tax Settlement Reengineering Project Methods of Filing and 
Paying Focus Group Interviews

    Description: These collections of this information will assist the 
reengineering team in implementing changes to IRS processes that will 
lead to increased compliance and quality service to the public.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 180.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:

Screening participants--54 hours each

Interview sessions plus travel--270 hours each
    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 648 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-15102 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
H. Res. 88 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 27, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1) making supplemental appropriations for job 

preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy 

efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and 

State and local fiscal stabilization, for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall 

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed three and one half 

hours equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations, who 

may yield control of blocks of that time. After general debate, 

the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No 
2 

•HRES 88 EH 

further consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40772

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JAMES HIRAM KOUNTZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 307

Filed: January 6, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Kootenai County. Hon. Charles W. Hosack, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of four years, for aggravated battery with use of a deadly 

weapon during the commission of a crime and a persistent violator sentencing 

enhancement, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

James Hiram Kountz was convicted of aggravated battery with use of a deadly weapon 

during the commission of a crime and a persistent violator sentencing enhancement, Idaho Code 

§ 18-907. The district court sentenced Kountz to a unified term of twenty years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of four years. Kountz appeals, contending that his sentence is 

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Kountz’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Robert D.Ollwerther, Chief Executive Officer and President of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  November 14, 2007              |                     |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                  |
| By                                    | /s/ ROBERT D. OLLWERTHER |   |
| Robert D. Ollwerther                  |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| **(Principal  Executive Officer)**    |
|                                       |                          |  |  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14413]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated April 1, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 8, 1996, (61 FR 15523), Stepan Company Natural 
Products Department, 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, 
made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be 
registered as an importer of a basic classes of controlled substances 
listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Drug                               Schedule  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coca Leaves (904).........................................       II     
Cocaine (9041)............................................       II     
Benzoylecgonine (9180)....................................       II     
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Stepan Company Natural Products 
Department to import coca leaves, cocaine and benzoylecgonine is 
consistent with the public interest and with Untied States obligations 
under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on 
May 1, 1971, at this time. Therefore, pursuant to Section 1008(a) of 
the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act and in accordance with 
Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 1311.42, the above firm 
is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed above.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control; Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-14413 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### Becky Marie KILGORE, Respondent, v. James Edward KILGORE, Appellant.

No. WD 49040.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Lloyd P. Koelker, Kansas City, for appellant.

Linda L. Shennan, Crouch, Spangler & Douglas, Harrisonville, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and KENNEDY and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal by father from child custody provisions of dissolution of marriage decree.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Sean DELAHANTY, Respondent.

No. 93-SC-994-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

June 23, 1994.

*ORDER*

This cause is before the Court upon the recommendation of the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association which adjudged the respondent guilty of violating SCR 3.130-1.5(a) by charging an unreasonable fee, and by failing to adequately communicate the basis of the fee before or within a reasonable time after commencing representation. It was further adjudged that the respondent was guilty of violating SCR 3.130-1.16(d) by failing to reasonably return papers and property to a client upon reasonable request. As punishment, the majority voted for a public reprimand and the requirement that respondent submit the fee dispute with his client for fee arbitration.

Upon review of the Board’s recommendation, and having considered the entire record, it is the decision of this Court to adopt the Board’s recommendation pursuant to SCR 3.380.

Accordingly, the respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded and shall bear the costs and payment of this action in the amount of $3,677.56. Additionally, respondent should undertake legal fee arbitration pursuant to SCR 3.810 within 90 days from the date hereof, or show cause why such proceedings are not applicable.

All concur.

LEIBSON, J., not sitting.

ENTERED: June 23, 1994.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens ROBERT F. STEPHENS, Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 14.1

         Code of Ethics For Directors and Officers of Hybrid Fuels Inc.


In my role as _________________________________ (title) of Hybrid Fuels Inc., I
recognize that I hold an important and elevated role in the corporate governance
of the Company. I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that shareholders
interests are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this
Code of Ethics for Directors and Officers (Code) provides principles to which I
am expected to adhere and advocate. The Code embodies rules regarding individual
and peer responsibilities, as well as responsibilities to the Company, the
public and its shareholders.

I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and
responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct as permitted by
the securities laws.

To the best of my knowledge and ability:

     1.   I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent
          conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships.

     2.   I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete,
          objective, relevant, timely and understandable within accepted
          materiality standards.

     3.   I provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure
          on SEC reports and other public communications.

     4.   I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and
          local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory
          agencies.

     5.   I act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and
          diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my
          independent judgment to be subordinated.

     6.   I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
          my work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to
          disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of my work
          is not used for personal advantage.

     7.   I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my
          constituents' needs.

     8.   I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
          peers in my work environment and community.

     9.   I achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources
          employed or entrusted to me.

     10.  I promptly report all material internal violations of the Code to my
          supervisor, chief financial officer, internal audit or the Disclosure
          Committee as appropriate.

     11.  I acknowledge that any material violation of the Code may subject me
          to disciplinary action up to and including termination.




____________________________ (Signature )    ____________________________ (Date)



____________________________ (Name Printed)