alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cytta Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, ChadRutherford, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of      the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificationas of the 17 th day of August, 2007.

/s/ Chad Rutherford

Chief Executive Officer

And Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARKEZ PRIEST,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 262 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Revolutions Medical Corporation
(formerly Maxxon, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rondald L. Wheet , Chief Executive Officer (and
principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of section 13(a)
     or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


April 23, 2008                               /s/ RONDALD L. WHEET
                                             --------------------
                                             Rondald L. Wheet,
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             principal financial officer

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
#### Mary Highland MOORE, Respondent, v. Thomas Richard HIGHLAND, Appellant.

No. WD 40999.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 30, 1989.

Craig A. Van Matre, Columbia, for appellant.

*750Roger P. Krumm, Fulton, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, C.J., and NUGENT and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Husband Thomas R. Highland appeals the child support and maintenance awards in a decree of dissolution dated July 29, 1988.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.






This
certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (the
‘‘Issuer’’).




I, Tim
Courtis, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best
of my knowledge:




1. The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
and




2. The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer.




Dated:
      May 3, 2010
            
            /s/ Tim CourtisTim
      Courtis
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 17, 2009 

l0610 

Order 

 

June 17, 2009 

138192 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138192 

 COA: 289184 

Wayne CC: 07-010239-FH 

WILLIAM TERRELL STEVENSON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 7, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Infrastructure Materials Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2011

/s/ Todd D. Montgomery 
Todd D. Montgomery 
Chief Executive Officer 
Infrastructure Materials Corp.

Dated: November 14, 2011

/s/ Rakesh Malhotra 
Rakesh Malhotra 
Chief Financial Officer 
Infrastructure Materials Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infrastructure Material Corp. and will be retained by Infrastructure Materials Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
DISTRICT JUDGE'S CIVIL MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: David G. Campbell

Case Number: CV-18-00621-PHX-DGC

Date: January 23, 2020 

Satanic Temple et al v. City of Scottsdale

APPEARANCES: Plaintiff(s) Counsel Defendant(s) Counsel

Matthew A. Kezhaya

Stuart Patrick deHaan

Scot L. Claus

Holly Marie Zoe

Vail Choji Bryant Cloar

BENCH TRIAL DAY 2:

8:45 a.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion is held regarding Exhibits 5 and 8. The Court takes the 

admissibility of Exhibits 5 and 8 under advisement. 9:04 a.m. Plaintiffs’ case continues: Crossexamination of Brian Biesemeyer. 9:22 a.m. Redirect. 9:30 a.m. The Court asks the witness questions. 

9:36 a.m. Defendant’s follow up to Court’s questions. 9:38 a.m. Plaintiffs’ follow up to the Court’s 

questions. 9:40 a.m. Kelli Kuester is sworn and examined. 10:20 a.m. Cross-examination. 10:30 a.m. 

Court is in recess.

10:45 a.m. Court reconvenes. Cross examination of Kelli Kuester continues. 10:49 a.m. No redirect. 

The Court asks the witness questions. 10:53 a.m. Douglas Alexander Misicko is sworn and examined. 

Exhibit 3 is admitted. 11:11 a.m. Cross-examination. Exhibit 103 is admitted. 12:04 p.m. Court is in 

recess. 

1:00 p.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion is held regarding Exhibit 105. Exhibit 105 is admitted to the 

limited extent it is being used. The Court will not consider Clip 2 of Exhibit 5. Clip 4 of Exhibit 105 is 

played. Exhibits 56 - 60 are admitted. Exhibit 63 is admitted. Exhibit 83 is admitted. Exhibit 61 is 

admitted. Exhibits 78, 79, 81, and 85 are admitted. 2:09 p.m. Redirect. 2:16 p.m. Witness is excused.

Plaintiffs rest. Court is in recess. 

2:32 p.m. Court reconvenes. Defendants move for judgment pursuant to Rule 52. 2:44 p.m. Plaintiffs’ 

response. The Court takes the motion under advisement. Defendant’s case: Defendant makes its offer 

of proof as it pertains to Mr. deHaan. 2:54 p.m. Defendant rests. Closing statements and arguments are 

presented to the Court. 4:28 p.m. The Court takes the matter under advisement. 

Deputy Clerk: Christine Boucher

Court Reporter: Patricia Lyons

Time in court: 6 hrs. 16 min.

Start: 8:45 a.m.

Stop: 4:28 p.m.

 

Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 86 Filed 01/23/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 450 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 54
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 450

                          [Report No. 111-113]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2009

  Mr. Perlmutter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of May 19, 2009, providing 
for consideration or disposition of the bill (S. 896) to prevent 
mortgage foreclosures and enhance mortgage credit availability.
                                                  House Calendar No. 54

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 450

                          [Report No. 111-113]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 18, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT
32.2








NET
TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 of Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Guillermo
      RodriguezGuillermo
      RodriguezChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
      February 12, 2010







34
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29492-29493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14703]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 89-590; RM-7071, RM-7855]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Sumter, Orangeburg and Columbia, SC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Gamecock City Broadcasting, 
Inc. (now Threshold Broadcasting, Inc.), dismisses the request to 
reallot Channel 267C from Sumter to Columbia, South Carolina, and 
modify Station WWDM's license accordingly. See 55 Fed. Reg. 883, 
January 10, 1990. The Commission also denies the request of Radio South 
Carolina, Inc., to reallot Channel 294C1 from Orangeburg to Columbia, 
and the modification of Station WTCB(FM)'s license accordingly. See 57 
Fed. Reg. 7902, March 5, 1992. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 89-590, adopted May 24, 1996, and 
released June 4, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.


[[Page 29493]]


Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-14703 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 771 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 771

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 29, 2010.
Whereas mesothelioma is a terminal, asbestos-related cancer that affects the 
        linings of the lungs, abdomen, heart, or testicles;
Whereas workers exposed on a daily basis over a long period of time are most at 
        risk, but even short-term exposures can cause the disease and an 
        exposure to asbestos for as little as one month can result in 
        mesothelioma 20-50 years later;
Whereas asbestos was used in the construction of virtually all office buildings, 
        public schools, and homes built before 1975 and asbestos is still on the 
        United States market in over 3,000 products;
Whereas there is no known safe level of exposure to asbestos;
Whereas millions of workers in the United States have been, and continue to be, 
        exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos;
Whereas the National Institutes of Health reported to Congress in 2006 that 
        mesothelioma is a difficult disease to detect, diagnose, and treat;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute recognizes a clear need for new agents to 
        improve the outlook for patients with mesothelioma and other asbestos-
        related diseases;
Whereas for decades, the need to develop treatments for mesothelioma was 
        overlooked and today, even the best available treatments usually have 
        only a very limited effect and the expected survival time of those 
        diagnosed with the disease is between 8 and 14 months;
Whereas mesothelioma has claimed the lives of such heroes and public servants as 
        Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, Jr., and Congressman Bruce F. Vento, and a high 
        percentage of today's mesothelioma victims were exposed to asbestos 
        while serving in the United States Navy;
Whereas it is believed that many of the firefighters, police officers, and 
        rescue workers from Ground Zero on September 11, 2001, may be at 
        increased risk of contracting mesothelioma in the future;
Whereas the establishment of a National Mesothelioma Awareness Day would raise 
        public awareness of the disease and of the need to develop treatments 
        and enhance public awareness for it; and
Whereas cities and localities across the country are recognizing September 26 as 
        Mesothelioma Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Mesothelioma Awareness Day; and
            (2) urges the President to issue a proclamation calling on the 
        people of the United States, Federal departments and agencies, States, 
        localities, organizations, and media to annually observe a National 
        Mesothelioma Awareness day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.13

AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT

This Amendment to Lease Agreement is made and entered into this 20th day of September, 2004, by and between NP#2, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company,
(Landlord), and IOMED, INC, a Utah Corporation ("Tenant").

WHEREAS,
on May 22th 2000, a Lease Agreement (the lease) was entered into between Landlord and Tenant, relating to certain real property situated at 2441 South 3850 West, West
Valley City, Salt Lake County, state of Utah, consisting of approximately 34,000 square feet of office/warehouse space, as further described in the Lease.

WHEREAS,
Landlord and Tenant are desirous to amend the said Lease.

NOW,
THEREFORE, for an in consideration of the payment of Ten Dollars and No Cents ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to Landlord, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties mutually agree as follows:



Period

Month

Monthly

AnnualOctober 1 - December 31, 2004

3

$
20,258.00

$
60,774/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2005

12

$
20,663.00

$
247,956/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2006

12

$
21,828.00

$
261,936/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2007

12

$
21,921.00

$
263,052/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2008

12

$
22,580.00

$
270,960/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2009

12

$
23,256.00

$
279,072/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2010

12

$
23,954.00

$
287,448/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2011

12

$
24,673.00

$
296,076/yr    net/net/netJanuary 1 - December 31, 2012

12

$
25,413.00

$
304,956/yr    net/net/net




EXECUTED
the day and year first above written.

LANDLORD:
NP #2 LLCBy /s/F.C. STANGLF.C. Stangl, Manager MemberTENANT:
IOMED Inc. a Utah CorporationBy /s/BRIAN MOWERBrian Mower, Chief Accounting Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### Darwin CONLEY, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 55120.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 6, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 11, 1989.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 12, 1989.

*864Valerian Clyde Cahill, St. Louis, for mov-ant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Jared R. Cone, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Movant, Darwin Conley, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion (repealed January 1, 1988) with prejudice for failure to prosecute. We affirm.

Movant was convicted, after a jury trial, of rape, kidnapping, robbery in the first degree, two counts of sodomy and two counts of armed criminal action. He was sentenced to a total of 115 years. Those convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. *State v. Conley,*698 S.W.2d 542 (Mo.App.1985). Movant then brought this Rule 27.-26 motion.

On the day this motion was set for an evidentiary hearing, movant was represented by counsel. He was incarcerated in the St. Louis County Jail, having been previously transported from the penitentiary for the purpose of the motion hearing. On the morning of the hearing, movant refused to leave his cell when correctional officers attempted to take him to court. Based upon that evidence, the motion court dismissed movant’s motion with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

There is no federal constitutional requirement that a state provide a means of post-conviction review. *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 693 (Mo. banc 1989). Missouri has nonetheless provided for such. A proceeding for post-conviction relief is an independent civil proceeding governed by law applicable to civil cases. *Johns v. State,*741 S.W.2d 771, 778 (Mo.App.1987). Control of the proceeding is within the sound discretion of the motion court. *Id.*

Rule 67.02 provides for involuntary dismissal for failure to prosecute. Rule 67.02 simply codifies an inherent power of the motion court which exists in absence of statute or rule. *Watkins Inv. Co. v. William B. Tanner Co.,*684 S.W.2d 929, 937, (Mo.App.1985).

Movant had the burden of proof. When he refused to go forward with his evidence, the motion court clearly acted within its discretion in dismissing his motion for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 67.02, *supra.*In view of our holding, we do not address the merits of defendant’s motion.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed.

REINHARD and CRIST, JJ., concur.
Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Joye Vaught,

Defendant.

 CR-2018-0422-SMB

MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR MS. 

VAUGHT APPEAR BY PHONE OR 

VIDEOCONFERENCING AT 

AUGUST 4, 2023 HEARING 

NOW COMES the Defendant, Joye Vaught, by and through her counsel of 

record, Joy Bertrand, to ask this Court for leave for her to appear by phone or 

video conferencing at the August 4, 2023 hearing in this matter. As further 

grounds therefore, the Defendant submits the following:

Like Andrew Padilla, Ms. Vaught lives in the Dallas, Texas area. Roundtrial airfare to Phoenix and lodging would cost approximately $1,100 before 

ground transportation – a considerable expense for Ms. Vaught, who remains 

indigent. 

The Court will find attached a proposed Order.

Joy Bertrand, Esq.

PO Box 2734

Scottsdale, Arizona 85252-2734

Telephone: 602-374-5321

Fax: 480-361-4694

joyous@mailbag.com

www.joybertrandlaw.com

Arizona State Bar No. 024181

ATTORNEY FOR: DEFENDANT

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1671 Filed 08/04/23 Page 1 of 3
Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on August 4, 2023.

s/Joy Bertrand

Joy Bertrand

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1671 Filed 08/04/23 Page 2 of 3
Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On August 4, 2023, I, Joy Bertrand, attorney for the Defendant, Joye 

Vaught, filed the Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Appear by Phone at August 4, 

2023 Hearing with the Arizona District Court’s electronic filing system. Based on 

my training and experience with electronic filing in the federal courts, it is my 

understanding that a copy of this request will be electronically served upon

opposing counsel and codefendant counsel upon its submission to the Court.

Respectfully submitted this Fourth day of August, 2023.

s/Joy Bertrand

Joy Bertrand

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1671 Filed 08/04/23 Page 3 of 3