alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16021]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 51 and 52

[FRL-5526-2]


Control of Air Pollution; Removal and Modification of Obsolete, 
Superfluous or Burdensome Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to Clean Air Act final 
regulations, which were published April 11, 1996 (61 FR 16050). The 
regulations related to the removal and modification of obsolete, 
superfluous or burdensome Clean Air Act rules.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This action will be effective June 24, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen Delaney, Office of Air and 
Radiation, Office of Policy Analysis and Review, (202) 260-7431.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 11, 1996, EPA published a final rule under the Clean Air 
Act deleting superfluous, obsolete or burdensome regulations from the 
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations contain errors which may prove 
to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on April 11, 1996 of the final 
regulations (61 FR 16050), which were the subject of FR Doc. 96-8744, 
is corrected as follows:
    On page 16061, in the third column, the heading for amendment 
number 38 is corrected to read ``Sec. 52.1227--[removed and 
reserved].''
    On page 16062, in the third column, amendment number 67 is 
corrected to read ``67. Section 52.2296 through 52.2298 are removed and 
reserved.''

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 51

    Environmental Protection, Air pollution control

    Dated: June 17, 1996.
Richard D. Wilson,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 96-16021 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**Exhibit 4.12**
Exhibit C 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-3 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 2
Business Name 2013 2014 2015 2016 

 Backpage.com 112,694,191.00 134,928,026.00 45,543,673.00

 Website Tech 51,896,668.00 76,598,293.00 74

 Ad Tech BV 9,714,327.00 51,947,374.00 6

Total Revenues by Year 112,694,191.00 134,928,026.00 107,154,668.00 128,545,667.00 135

2013 2014 2015

Michael Lacey $ 50,400,876 38,540,819 $ 25,907,885 $ James Larkin 49,208,968 37,436,225 23,948,701Jed Brunst 10,174,688 6,025,074 3,803,023Scott Spear 4,358,907 2,955,254 2,779,706

Total Income by Year $ 84,957,372 $ 114,143,439 $ 56,439,315 

Annual Revenue for Business Entities

Years 2013 - 2018

Total Reported Income from Medalist Holdings, Inc. 

Years 2013 -2015

 Officer Compensation, Ordinary Business Income and Interest Income Combined 

USAO

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-3 Filed 08/19/21 Page 2 of 2
#### James WEBSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66528.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 28, 1995.

Nancy L. Vincent, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Koeot, Asst. Atty. Gen., *Jefferson*City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the action of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Joe Loeppky, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Search By
Headlines.com Corp. for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2008 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Search By Headlines.com Corp.

Dated: June 13, 2008

/s/ Joe LoppkyJoe LoeppkyPresident, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Search By
Headlines.com Corp. and will be retained by Search By Headlines.com Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 897 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 897

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 2, 2009.
Whereas veterans have made innumerable sacrifices for the freedom and welfare of 
        the United States and people worldwide;
Whereas in 2008 there were over 23,000,000 veterans in the United States, but 
        many elementary and secondary school students are not aware of the 
        efforts veterans have made to protect our freedoms;
Whereas many elementary and secondary schools and teachers have held drives in 
        recent years to collect items to send to veterans, members of the Armed 
        Forces, and families of such members;
Whereas fewer than half of the Nation's high school seniors have a basic 
        knowledge of American history and the contributions veterans have made 
        to the Nation's safety and security;
Whereas it is important for elementary and secondary school students to learn 
        about the history of the Nation and the wars and missions veterans have 
        participated in and sacrificed for; and
Whereas elementary and secondary schools across the Nation host Veterans Day 
        programs to honor and educate students about the sacrifices veterans 
        have made: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of teaching elementary and secondary 
        school students, on Veterans Day and throughout the school year, about 
        the sacrifices that veterans have made throughout the history of the 
        Nation; and
            (2) encourages elementary and secondary schools to engage students 
        in learning about, and honoring, veterans and the sacrifices they have 
        made.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company
Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Yan Zhi Qing, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

       1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: June 29, 2004




                                       By: /s/ Yan Zhi Qing
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name: Yan Zhi Qing
                                       Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors



*      This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
       Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
       by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
       purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
       amended.

*      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
       the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
       be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
       Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DONNA L. MEANOR, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WAGNER, SR., DECEASED; FAIRMAN DRILLING COMPANY; ALAN R. FAIRMAN; SANDRA R. FAIRMAN; RONALD R. FAIRMAN; BEVERLY A. FAIRMAN; RICHARD M.
FAIRMAN; GARY D. FAIRMAN; FRANK G. FAIRMAN; TERRY L. FAIRMAN; WILLIAM WOOD AND BETTY WOOD, HIS WIFE; DOLORES M. WAGNER; DOLORES J. WAGNER; COUNTY

- WIDE REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC.; B. LEONARD BRODY; PATRICK F. MCCARTHY; E. JAMES TRIMARCHI; DAVID R. TOMB; WAGNER AND

WA GNER; JAMES CARSON AND SUSAN CARSON, HIS WIFE

v.

PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, A

DIVISION OF THE FORMER EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.

PETITION OF: ROBERT A. WAGNER :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 149 WAL 2019

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior

Court

DONNA L. MEANOR, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WAGNER, SR., DECEASED; FAIRMAN DRILLING COMPANY; ALAN R. FAIRMAN; SANDRA R. FAIRMAN; RONALD R. FAIRMAN; BEVERLY A. FAIRMAN; RICHARD M. FAIRMAN; GARY D. FAIRMAN; FRANK G. FAIRMAN;TERRY L. FAIRMAN;

WILLIAM WOOD AND BETTY WOOD, HIS WIFE; DOLORES M. WAGNER; DOLORES J. WAGNER; COUNTY

- WIDE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 150 WAL 2019

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior

Court[ 149 WAL 2019 and 150 WAL 2019 ]

- 2

REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC.; B. LEONARD BRODY; PATRICK F. MCCARTHY; E. JAMES TRIMARCHI; DAVID R. TOMB; WAGNER AND WAGNER; JAMES CARSON AND SUSAN CARSON, HIS WIFE

v.

PEOPL ES NATURAL GAS COMPANY, LLC, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, LLC F/K/A EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, A

DIVISION OF THE FORMER EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.

PETITION OF: ROBERT A. WAGNER :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of October, 2019

, the Cross Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
1 CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT CARL 

FERRER’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jonathan M. Baum (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 

One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower Ste 1070 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: (415) 365-6700 

Fax: (415) 365-6700 

jbaum@steptoe.com 

Tahir L. Boykins ((Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 

633 W. Fifth St., Ste. 1900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Tel: (213) 439-9400 

Fax: (213) 439-9599 

tboykins@steptoe.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CARL FERRER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN 

BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT 

CARL FERRER’S MOTION FOR A 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 

[Filed concurrently herewith Movant Carl 

Ferrer’s Motion for A Protective Order]

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1827 Filed 10/03/23 Page 1 of 6
2 CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT CARL 

FERRER’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I, Jonathan M. Baum, hereby declare: 

1. I am a partner with Steptoe & Johnson LLP, counsel for 

Movant Carl Ferrer in this action. I have personal knowledge of the facts contained 

herein and, if called, I could testify competently to them. 

2. James Grant of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP served as Mr. Ferrer’s 

personal counsel in the criminal case filed against him in Sacramento County, California. 

Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and accurate copy of the title page of a Sacramento 

Superior Court Criminal Pleading where Grant is identified as “Counsel for Defendants 

Carl Ferrer, Michael Lacey and James Larkin.” 

 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed in Washington, D.C. on October 3, 2023. 

 

/s/ Jonathan M. Baum 

Jonathan M. Baum 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1827 Filed 10/03/23 Page 2 of 6
3 CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT CARL 

FERRER’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 3, 2023, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record. 

 /s/ Debbie DeRivero 

 Debbie DeRivero 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1827 Filed 10/03/23 Page 3 of 6
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1827 Filed 10/03/23 Page 4 of 6
ex1027.htm


    

      EXHIBIT
10.27

       

      [PG&E
CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]

      


      AMENDMENT
TO SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

      AND
OTHER BONUS PROGRAMS

      


      


      All
current and future bonus plans of PG&E Corporation (“PG&E”) with an
annual (or shorter) performance period (the “Plans”) are hereby amended as
described below, effective January 1, 2009.

      


      1.           Payments
under the Plans shall be made within two months and 15 days following the end of
the calendar year in which such payments cease to be subject to a “substantial
risk of forfeiture,” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (“Section 409A”).  In the event that PG&E’s taxable
year ceases to be the calendar year, then payments under the Plans shall be made
within two months and 15 days following the later of the end of the calendar
year or PG&E’s taxable year in which such payments cease to be subject to a
“substantial risk of forfeiture,” within the meaning of Section
409A.

      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PG&E
Corporation has caused this Plan to be executed by its Senior Vice President,
Human Resources, at the direction of the Chief Executive Officer, on December
31, 2008.

       

       

      
        	
              	 	  PG&E
      CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	                                                        	 By:  
      	 JOHN
      R. SIMON 
	
                 
      

              	 	
                 
      John R. Simon

              
	 	 	  Senior
      Vice President - Human Resources


      

       

       


      
        
          
             

            


             

          

           


        

        
          1
EXHIBIT 1 

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’  

MOTION TO DISMISS 

The Satanic Temple and Michelle Shortt v. City of Scottsdale 

Case No. 18‐cv‐00621‐DGC 

Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 13-1 Filed 07/06/18 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

David Francisco, 

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00378-003-PHX-DGC

DETENTION ORDER 

 On May 21, 2018, David Francisco (the “Defendant”) appeared before this Court 

on a Petition to Revoke Conditions of Release and submitted the issue to the Court. The 

Court considered the information provided to the Court in determining whether the 

Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(1): 

☐ There is probable cause to believe that the Defendant has committed a 

Federal, State, or local crime while on release. 

☒ There is clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant has 

violated the conditions of release. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2): 

☐ Rebuttable Presumption where Probable Cause to Believe Felony 

Committed on Pretrial Release. The Defendant has failed to rebut the 

presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will 

assure that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any 

other person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2) 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(providing that rebuttable presumption of dangerousness applies if 

there is probable cause to believe that while on release a defendant 

has committed a Federal, State, or local felony). 

☒ Flight Risk. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not flee. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); U.S. 

v. Gotti, 794 F.2d 773, 778 (2nd Cir. 1986) (holding that “findings 

made under section 3148(b) may be established by a preponderance of 

the evidence”). 

☐ Dangerousness. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any other 

person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); Gotti, 794 

F.2d at 778. 

☒ Compliance with Conditions. The Court finds by a preponderance of 

the evidence that the Defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition 

or combination of conditions of release. See 18 U.S.C. § 

3148(b)(2)(B); Gotti, 794 F.2d at 778. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 21st day of May, 2018. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-1357V

UNPUBLISHED

PAMELA DEZURIK,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: January 19, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu);

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA).

Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On October 9, 2020, Pamela Dezurik filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (SIRVA) as a result of the administration of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on 

September 30, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 4, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case because she suffered a SIRVA as 

defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1, 7-8. Specifically, 

Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of the affected shoulder 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

that would explain the alleged signs, symptoms, examination findings, and/or diagnostic 

studies occurring after vaccination; Petitioner’s pain began within 48 hours after 

vaccination; Petitioner’s pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was 

administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain 

Petitioner’s left shoulder pain. Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner suffered 

the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jon RHODES, Appellant. Jon RHODES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 62629, 65076.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Aug. 23, 1994.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah M. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Munich, Randell G. Collins, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant was convicted of burglary in the first degree in violation of § 569.160 RSMo 1986 and appeals the judgment and sentence of the trial court. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Defendant was sentenced as a Class X offender pursuant to §§ 557.036.4, 558.016 and 558.019 RSMo Cum.Supp.1991 to a term of fifteen years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the *735parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).