alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1997-2
$ 214,068,614 6.35% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000




           PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
              DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
          ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-2000   3,310,424     573,302     254,529    5.82%    4,387,599    8.14%
 Feb-2000   3,050,544     573,302     204,171    4.96%    4,571,165    8.97%
 Mar-2000   3,228,399     573,302     222,646    5.78%    3,339,167    6.99%
 Apr-2000   3,318,473     573,302     184,190    5.15%    3,010,280    6.77%
 May-2000   2,730,146     573,302     122,486    3.66%    2,779,016    6.81%
 Jun-2000   3,029,472     573,302     172,069    5.56%    2,863,223    7.58%
 Jul-2000   2,695,596     573,302      19,075    0.66%    2,499,976    7.13%
 Aug-2000   2,422,257     573,302      22,926    0.86%    2,648,384    8.14%
 Sep-2000   2,417,995     573,302      21,282    0.86%    2,366,587    7.84%
 Oct-2000   2,207,527     573,302      51,012    2.24%    2,248,712    8.04%
 Nov-2000   2,209,468     573,302      24,876    1.19%    2,382,685    9.26%
 Dec-2000   2,016,483     573,302      67,740    3.51%    2,262,796    9.55%
          ____________ ___________ ___________
   Totals  32,636,785   6,879,627   1,367,003

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 891 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 891

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 17, 2009.
Whereas on the evening of October 29, 2009, a Coast Guard C-130 aircraft with 
        two pilots and five crewmembers on board was involved in a search and 
        rescue mission off the coast of California;
Whereas at the same time, a Marine Corps AH-1W Super Cobra carrying two pilots 
        was involved in a military escort mission nearby;
Whereas the two aircraft are suspected to have collided while traveling east of 
        San Clemente Island, California;
Whereas the following crew members of the Coast Guard C-130 are missing and 
        presumed to have lost their lives in the line of duty: Lt. Cmdr. Che J. 
        Barnes of Capay, California; Lt. Adam W. Bryant, of Crewe, Virginia; 
        Chief Petty Officer John F. Seidman of Stockton, California; Petty 
        Officer 2nd Class Carl P. Grigonis of Mayfield Heights, Ohio; Petty 
        Officer 2nd Class Monica L. Beacham of Decaturville, Tennessee; Petty 
        Officer 2nd Class Jason S. Moletzsky of Norristown, Pennsylvania; and 
        Petty Officer 3rd Class Danny R. Kreder II, of Elm Mott, Texas;
Whereas the following crew members of the Marine Corps helicopter are missing 
        and presumed to have lost their lives in the line of duty: Maj. Samuel 
        Leigh of Kennebec, Maine, and 1st Lt. Thomas Claiborne of Douglas 
        County, Colorado;
Whereas the men and women of the Coast Guard are ``Always Ready'' to safeguard 
        the United States against all hazards and threats at our ports, at sea, 
        and around the world; and
Whereas the men and women of the Marine Corps are ``Always Faithful'' to their 
        mission of defending the United States on the ground, in the air, and by 
        sea, in every corner of the globe: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its gratitude for the 
service to our Nation of the Coast Guard and Marine Corps aircraft pilots and 
crewmembers lost off the coast of California on October 29, 2009, and extends 
its condolences to their family, friends, and loved ones.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 23

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP (LOGO)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-45949, File No. 333-68855,
File No. 333-77111, File No. 333-73240 and File No. 333-86796) and Form S-3
(File No. 333-84764) of our report dated February 5, 2003, except for Note 6, as to which the date is March 17, 2003, relating to the
consolidated financial statements, which appears in the 2002 Annual Report to
Shareholders of PMA Capital Corporation, which is incorporated by reference in
PMA Capital Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated February 5, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedules,
which appears in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
March 20, 2003

---
#### Fred L. VICKERY, Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. 65534.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Oct. 4, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 31, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 20, 1994.

Joseph A. Lott, Herbert D. Schaeffer, Lott & Schaeffer, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Maria W. Campbell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for Second Injury Fund.

Before SMITH, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM OPINION*

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from the action of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying liability by the Second Injury Fund for allegedly pre-existing disabilities which when combined with a subsequent employer compensable accident, resulted in permanent total disability. The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, no error of law appears, and an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for affirmance. Award of the Commission is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Rodney Earl HARRIS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

No. 57048.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 10, 1990.

*868Michael L. Lyons, Office of the State Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-ap-pellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3223

_____________________________
K IMBERLY C ANNON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. May 17, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Kimberly Cannon, pro se
, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### BOEHMER, Karen, Appellant, v. KOPFENSTEINER, David, Respondent.

No. 66220.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Oct. 17, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 20, 1995.

Charles Clifford Schwartz, Jr., Schwartz & Ochs, St. Louis, Margaret T. Donnelly, Clayton, for appellant.

Kenneth H. Graeber, Uthoff, Graeber, Bo-binette & O’Keefe, St. Louis, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Karen Boehmer (“mother”), appeals an order entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis granting respondent’s, David Kopfensteiner (“father”), motion to modify a prior dissolution decree with respect to child custody whereby it transferred physical and legal care of the parties’ minor child to father. Father filed a motion to dismiss mother’s appeal which was taken with the case, and which is herein denied. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
##### 



Exhibit 12.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

Date: 23 May, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Sir William Castell, Chief Executive, and Giles F B Kerr, Finance
Director, of Amersham plc, each certify that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. |  | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Amersham plc.



| | Name: Sir William Castell
Chief Executive
| | -----------------------------------------



| | Name: Giles F B Kerr
Finance Director
| | -------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Amersham plc and will be retained by Amersham plc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCWC-18-0000612

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

KRISTINE L.T. MICHELS,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000612; CASE. NO. 3DTA-18-00638)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,

Circuit Judge Wong, in place of Nakayama, J., recused,

and Circuit Judge Chang, assigned by reason of vacancy)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate 

Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of 

certiorari was filed, see Hawaii Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) 

(2017); see also Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)

Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000612

19-APR-2023

11:36 AM

Dkt. 9 ODSAC
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/DefendantAppellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed April 14

2023, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the 

application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2020) (“The 

application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing 

of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or 

dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is 

extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 19, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Paul B.K. Wong

/s/ Gary W.B. Chang
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Lee Stein (#12368)

lee@mscclaw.com

Anne M. Chapman (#025965) 

anne@mscclaw.com

MITCHELL | STEIN | CAREY | CHAPMAN, PC

One Renaissance Square

2 North Central Avenue, Suite 1450

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Telephone: (602) 358-0292

Facsimile: (602) 358-0291

Attorneys for Henze Cook Murphy, PLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. Michael Lacey, and

2. James Larkin,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

(FIRST REQUEST)

(Expedited Ruling Requested)

Henze Cook Murphy, PLC (“HCM”) hereby moves for an extension of its deadline 

to respond to the United States’ pending Motion to Disqualify Counsel filed on April 25, 

2015 (Doc. 118). The current deadline is May 23, 2018. HCM requests that the Court 

extend the response deadline by two weeks, to June 6, 2018. HCM makes this request 

because its counsel has been in discussions with the United States Attorney’s Office 

regarding resolution of the Motion. Counsel for HCM has consulted with the assigned 

AUSAs, who do not oppose the requested extension of the response time.

//

//

//

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 147 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on May 18, 2018.

MITCHELL | STEIN | CAREY | CHAPMAN, PC

By: /s/ Lee Stein 

Lee Stein

Anne Chapman

Attorneys for Henze Cook Murphy, PLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 18th day of May, 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF 

version of this document to the Clerk of Court, using the CM/ECF System, for filing and 

for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys of record.

/s/ B. Wolcott 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 147 Filed 05/18/18 Page 2 of 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MINUTES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON 

U.S. Magistrate Judge: Bernardo P. Velasco Date: May 11, 2018 

USA v. Scott Daniel Warren Case Number: CR-18-00223-001-TUC-RCC (BPV)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Anna Wright and Nathaniel Jacob Walters

Attorney for Defendant: Gregory John Kuykendall and Amy Knight, Retained Law Student 

Thomas Scott-Railton at counsel table 

Interpreter: N/A 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

MOTION HEARING: 

Parties first address the Government’s Motion for Protective Order [Doc. 68]. After hearing from 

defense counsel, the Order Granting that Motion [Doc. 69] remains. 

Defendant’s Motion to Suppress [Doc. 53] is set for hearing 5/29/2018 at 9:00 am. 

Motion Hearing regarding defendant’s Amended Motion to Dismiss Counts 2 and 3 [Doc. 45] 

proceeds. 

Defendant calls Mark Warren, who is sworn, examined by Mr. Kuykendall, cross examined by Mr. 

Walters, and excused. 

Defendant, Scott Daniel Warren, is sworn, examined by Mr. Kuykendall, cross examined by Ms. 

Wright, questioned by the Court, and excused. Government’s exhibit 56 (2 discs) is admitted. 

Recess taken from 3:49 pm to 4:04 pm. 

 Defense moves for the admission of Exhibits 101, 102, 103, and 104. Government objects to all 

exhibits and to 103 and 104 specifically as they have not had time to reviews the transcripts for 

accuracy. The Court will admit all exhibits, allowing a 2 week period for the Government to review 

transcripts before they will be considered. Defense rests. 

Closing arguments held. All original admitted exhibits retained by the Court. Defendant’s Amended 

Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 45] is TAKEN UNDER ADVISMENT. 

Recorded By Courtsmart

Deputy Clerk Sara Jones 

Mtn Hrg 2 hrs 27 min 

Start: 1:44 pm 

Stop: 4:26 pm 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 70 Filed 05/11/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rohat Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Delara Hussaini, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Delara Hussaini

Delara Hussaini
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Date: June 10, 2007
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016 (the Report) of
PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn            
|Name: Arthur H. Penn          
|Title: Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 8, 2016
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don A. Turkleson, Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Don A. Turkleson

---

Don A. Turkleson

Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC,

general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

May 8, 2007
#### Roland L. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. Linda A. JOHNSON, Respondent.

No. WD 50340.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 31, 1995.

Motion for Transfer to Supreme Court Dec. 5, 1995.

Roland L. Martinez, acting pro se.

Kevin Driscoll, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment of trial court against appellant and judgment in favor of respondent on her counterclaim.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ

- VELEZ,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 70499 Agency No. A087

- 906

- 024

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 26, 2016 **

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Miguel Angel Lopez

- Velez , a native and citizen of Guatemala , petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 3 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 70499

juris diction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence
the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th
Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence su pports the agency’s conclusion that Lopez

- Velez did

not establish changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse his untimely
asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4) , (5) ; see also Ramadan v.

Gonzalez , 479 F .3d 646, 656

- 58 (9th Cir. 2007) . Thus , we deny Lopez

- Velez ’s
petition as to his asylum claim.
Lopez

- Velez ’s counseled opening brief does not raise any arguments
challenging the agency’s rejectio n of his withholding of removal or CAT claims.

See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9 th Cir. 1996) ( issues not supported by argument in the brief are deemed abandoned ).
Lopez

- Velez asserts his case warrants remand and reopening based on
“newly discovered facts” and potential eligibility for adjustment of status , waiver
of inadmissibility, or relief pursuant to NACARA. We lack jurisdiction to

consider these claims because Lopez

- Velez did not present them to the agency.

See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004).
Finally, Lopez

- Velez ’s claim that his case warrants prose cutorial discretion3 14

- 70499

is not subject to judicial review. See Vilchiz

- Soto v. Holder , 688 F.3d 642, 644
(9th Cir. 2012) (order).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Case 2:17-cr-01468-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01468-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/18/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01468-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/18/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01468-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/18/17 Page 4 of 4
JAMES LARKIN’S NOTICE OF JOINDER IN DEFENDANT SCOTT SPEAR’S AMENDED MOTION 

FOR ISSUANCE OF 17(C) SUBPOENAS (DKT. 1019)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. (CA Bar No.135311, admitted pro hac vice)

Whitney Z. Bernstein (CA Bar No. 304917, admitted pro hac vice)

BIENERT | KATZMAN PC

903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350

San Clemente, California 92673

Telephone: (949) 369-3700

Facsimile: (949)369-3701

tbienert@bienertkatzman.com

wbernstein@bienartkatzman.com

Attorneys for James Larkin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey et al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-002-PHX-SMB

JAMES LARKIN’S NOTICE OF 

JOINDER IN DEFENDANT SCOTT 

SPEAR’S AMENDED MOTION FOR 

ISSUANCE OF 17(C) SUBPOENAS 

(DKT. 1019)

Assigned to: Hon. Susan M. Brnovich

Courtroom: 506

Trial Date: January 12, 2021

Defendant James Larkin, by and through his undersigned counsel, joins in Defendant 

Scott Spear’s Amended Motion for Issuance of Rule 17(c) Subpoenas (Dkt. 1019) (“Motion”).

Mr. Larkin agrees with the arguments made in the Motion. Mr. Larkin adopts the 

positions set forth in the Motion as if fully set forth herein.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of JULY 2020,

BIENERT | KATZMAN PC

s/ Whitney Z. Bernstein

Whitney Z. Bernstein

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr.

Attorneys for James Larkin

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1032 Filed 07/06/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 6, 2020, I electronically transmitted the attached

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

/s/ Toni Thomas

Toni Thomas

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1032 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 2