alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 874 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require all committees 

post record votes on their Web sites within 48 hours of such votes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. REICHERT (for himself, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. MCCARTHY of 

California, Mr. PENCE, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 

CARTER, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. LEWIS

of California, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. BACHUS, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. 

DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. HASTINGS

of Washington, Mr. ISSA, Mr. DREIER, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. GRAVES, 

Mr. MICA, Mr. CAMP, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. BUYER, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. AUSTRIA, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. MARCHANT, and Mr. WOLF) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require all committees post record votes on their Web 

sites within 48 hours of such votes. 

1 Resolved, That clause 2(e)(1)(B)(i) of rule XI of the 

2 Rules of the House of Representatives is amended— 

3 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘and 

4 within 48 hours of such record vote on its Web site 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 874 IH 

1 on the Internet’’ before the period at the end there2 of; and 

3 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘and 

4 information so available on its Web site’’ before 

5 ‘‘shall’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Eva SPAETE, Claimant/Appellant, v. AMERICAN STANDARD PRINTING COMPANY, Employer/Respondent, and Providence Washington Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian for the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.

No. 68629.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

March 5, 1996.

Harry James Nicholas, St. Louis, for appellant.

Scott Annunziata, St. Louis, for American Standard.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Vicky L. Anthony, Laura Newberry, Karla 0. Boresi, Asst. Attys. Gen., St. Louis, for Treasurer of Missouri.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Eva Spaete (“Claimant”), an employee of American Standard Printing (“Employer”), appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding that the Second Injury fund was not liable to the claimant for permanent total disability. We affirm. Claimant’s motion to strike a portion of Employer’s brief is granted.

The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their infor*627mation only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mehrdad (Mark) Moshayedi,certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of sTec, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2013 |  |  |  | /S/    MARK
MOSHAYEDI                
|                     |  |  |  | Mehrdad (Mark) Moshayedi             
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o . 0 9

- 5 0 7 0 4 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v . I R Y J A M E S W I L L I A M S , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o . 7 : 0 9

- C R

- 4 2

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M : * A p p e a l i n g t h e j u d g m e n t i n a c r i m i n a l c a s e , I r y J a m e s W i l l i a m s p r e s e n t s
a r g u m e n t s t h a t h e c o n c e d e s a r e f o r e c l o s e d

. S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v . D e L e o n , 1 7 0 F

. 3 d 4 9 4 , 4 9 9 ( 5 t h C i r . 1 9 9 9 ) ( r e j e c t i n g C o m m e r c e C l a u s e c h a l l e n g e t o f e l o n - i n p o s s e s s i o n - o f

- a - f

i r e a r m s t a t u t e , 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 9 2 2 ( g ) ) ; U n i t e d S t a t e s v . R a w l s , 8 5 F

. 3 d 2 4 0 , 2 4 2 ( 5 t h C i r . 1 9 9 6 ) ( s a m e )

. T h e G o v e r n m e n t ’ s m o t i o n f o r s u m m a r y
a f f i r m a n c e i s G R A N T E D , a n d t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s A F F I R M E D

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-50704 Document: 00511086093 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, President February 13, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IMAD HABEEB HANNA,

Petitioner,

 v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting

Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 16-72480

Agency No. A212-191-367

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 8, 2018

Portland, Oregon

Before: TALLMAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BOUGH,** District Judge.

 

Imad Habeeb Hanna, a native and citizen of Iraq, petitions for review of the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) and Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his

FILED

NOV 16 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.
application for asylum and withholding of removal.1

 We have jurisdiction based

on 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

The agency’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial

evidence because the BIA and IJ identified multiple inconsistences between

Hanna’s testimony about his service in the Iraqi Republican Guard and the

background documentary evidence submitted, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii), Singh

v. Lynch, 802 F.3d 972, 975 (9th Cir. 2015), Hanna had previously lied to

immigration officials, Singh v. Holder, 643 F.3d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir. 2011), and

Hanna failed to offer easily available corroborating evidence, Sidhu v. I.N.S., 220

F.3d 1085, 1092 (9th Cir. 2000), as amended on denial of reh’g (Sept. 27, 2000).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that the evidence in

the record indicates that the persecutor bar may apply to Hanna. 8 C.F.R.

§ 1240.8(d). Under either the test outlined in Miranda Alvarado v. Gonzales, 449

F.3d 915, 925–30 (9th Cir. 2006), or the BIA’s test established in In Matter of

D-R-, 27 I. & N. Dec. 105, 118–21 (BIA 2017), there was sufficient evidence to

support a prima facie case that Hanna may have “ordered, incited, assisted, or

otherwise participated in the persecution of” religious and ethnic minorities, 8

1

 Hanna was granted deferral of removal under the Convention Against

Torture because of his status as a Chaldean Christian.

2
U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42), based on unrebutted documentary evidence that the

Republican Guard was an all-volunteer force which had committed acts of

persecution during the time of Hanna’s service, and Hanna failed to testify credibly

about his membership or role in the Republican Guard. The IJ’s conclusion that

Hanna’s lies and evasions about his membership and attempts to minimize his role

gave rise to a negative inference regarding his time in the Republican Guard was

supported by substantial evidence in the record. Although Hanna had an

opportunity to rebut the prima facie case, he failed to introduce witnesses who

could substantiate a portion of his claims, and instead relied on his incredible and

inconsistent testimony, non-material testimony from his wife, and unclear military

records. 

PETITION DENIED. 

3
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s tha tthi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f or ** d e c is io n w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). T L/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RAM ON GA RC I A CRUZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 72222 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 151- 058 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R a m on G ar c i aC ruz , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g h is s e c o n dm o tio n to r e ope n. O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of 

# FI LED DE C 30 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST L/ Res ea r ch 07- 72222 2 d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e n . P er ezv. Mukasey , 516 F . 3d 770, 773 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d i s m i s s i n p artan dd e n yi n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew G ar ci a C ruz’ s c hal l enge t o the B IA ’ s J anuary 5, 20 05 , deci si on because he f ai l ed t o fi l e at i m el y pet i t i on for r evi ew of that d e c is io n . Se e Si ngh v . I NS , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 8 6 , 1 1 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng G ar c i aC ruz ’ s s e c ond m ot i on t o r e ope n a s unt i m e l ybe c aus e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d ove rtw o y e ar s a f

t e rthe f in a l a d m in is tr a tiv e o r d e r , se e 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 a ( c ) ( 7 ) ( C ) ( i) , an dG ar c iaG ru z d id n o t s h o w h e w a s e n title dto e q u itab le to llin g , s e e I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 8 9 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e de c l i ne G ar c i aC ruz ’ s r e que s tt o r e m and hi s c a s e t o the B I A f or cl ari fi cat i o n o f i t s o rd er b ecau se th e B IA ’ s d eci si o n i s n o tam b i g u o u s. L as t l y, w e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew G ar ci a C ruz’ s c on t ent i on thatthe B IA s h o u ldh a v e in v o k e dits s u as p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n h is p r o c e e d in g s . See Eki m i a n v . I

NS , 3 0 3 F .3 d1 1 5 3 , 1 1 5 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28252-28253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13848]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC 
20549
Extension:
    Form F-9, SEC File No. 270-333, OMB Control No. 3235-0377
    Form F-10, SEC File No. 270-334, OMB Control No. 3235-0380
    Regulation S-T, SEC File No. 270-375, OMB Control No. 3235-0424

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget requests for approval of extension on the following forms 
and regulation:
    Form F-9 is used to register investment grade debt and preferred

[[Page 28253]]

securities that are non-convertible or not convertible for at least one 
year under the Securities Act of 1933, by registrants incorporated or 
organized under the laws of Canada. This information is needed to 
provide full and fair disclosure to the investing public. Approximately 
210 Forms F-9 will be filed annually by Canadian issuers with an 
aggregate annual burden hours of 420.
    Form F-10 is used to register securities under the Securities Act 
of 1933, by any substantial issuer incorporated or organized under the 
laws of Canada. This information is needed to provide full and fair 
disclosure to the investing public. Approximately 210 Forms F-10 will 
be filed annually by Canadian issuers with an aggregate annual burden 
hours of 420.
    Regulation S-T sets forth the filing requirements relating to the 
submission of documents in electronic format through the Electronic 
Data Gathering and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. While the regulation does 
not specifically require any information to be disclosed but rather 
addresses the means by which disclosure required by other forms and 
regulations must be filed with the Commission. For administrative 
purposes this Regulation has been assigned 1 burden hour.
    General comments regarding the estimated burden hours should be 
directed to the Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission 
at the address below. Any comments concerning the accuracy of the 
estimated average burden hours for compliance with Commission rules and 
forms should be directed to Michael E. Bartell, Associate Executive 
Director, Office of Information Technology, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549 and Desk 
Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: May 23, 1996.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13848 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
J -A04012-20 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - 

IN THE INTEREST OF: K.K.K.-W., A 

MINOR APPEAL OF R.G. AND E.G., 

KINSHIP PARENTS 

SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

: No. 1891 EDA 2019 

Appeal from the Order Entered June 5, 2019 

in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 

Juvenile Division at No(s): CP-51-AP-0000831-2016 

BEFORE: PANELLA, P.J., STRASSBURGER, J.* and COLINS, J.* 

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED APRIL 20, 2020 

I join the learned Majority. Had I been the trial judge, I might well 

have reached the opposite result. However, given this Court's highly 

deferential standard of review, I am constrained to affirm. 

Judge Colins joins this concurring memorandum. 

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15096]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-703]


Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy; Extension of 
Time Limit of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Extension of Time Limit of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for preliminary results in the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) resin 
from Italy, covering the period August 1, 1994, through July 31, 1995, 
because it is not practicable to complete the reviews within the time 
limits mandated by the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 
1675(a)(the Act).

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 30, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Charles Riggle or Michael Rill, Office of Antidumping Compliance, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Department received a request to conduct an administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on granular PTFE resin from Italy. 
On October 12, 1995, the Department published a notice of initiation 
(60 FR 53164) of this administrative review covering the period June 1, 
1994, through May 31, 1995. The Department adjusted the time limits by 
28 days due to the government shutdowns, which lasted from November 14, 
1995, to November 20, 1995, and from December 15, 1995, to January 6, 
1996. See Memorandum to the file from Susan G. Esserman, Assistant 
Secretary for Import Administration, January 11, 1996.
    It is not practicable to complete this review within the time 
limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Therefore, in 
accordance with that section, the Department is extending the time 
limit for the preliminary results to September 27, 1996.
    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(b). 
These extensions are in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act.

    Dated: May 30, 1996.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 96-15096 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14733]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 060496C]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Mackerel Socioeconomic Panel (SEP) will convene a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held beginning at 11:00 a.m. on July 1, 1996 
and will conclude at 5:00 p.m. on July 2, 1996.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Radisson Bay Harbor Inn, 
7700 Courtney Campbell Causeway, Tampa FL; 813-281-8900.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 5401 
West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 331, Tampa, FL 33609.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antonio B. Lamberte, Economist; 
telephone: 813-228-2815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting will be to review 
available social and economic data on the Gulf of Mexico king mackerel 
fishery and to determine the social and economic implications of the 
levels of acceptable biological catch recommended by the Council's 
Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel. The SEP may recommend to the Council a 
total allowable catch level for the 1996-97 fishing year.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Anne Alford at the Council (see ADDRESSES) by 
June 24, 1996.

    Dated: June 5, 1996.
Richard H. Schaefer,
Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-14733 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 17, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Robert Kite                                               |
|--------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                  | Robert Kite                                                   |
|               |                  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer               |
|               |                  | (Principle Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |

----