alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Harrison SINGLETARY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-6660.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 14, 2003.

Decided Aug. 21, 2003.

James Harrison Singletary, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

*289Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

James Harrison Singletary seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Singletary has not made the requisite showing. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GEORGE McDANIEL, as Personal )

Representative of the Estate of )

STEVEN PATRICK McDANIEL, )

deceased, and on behalf of H.P.M., a )

minor, and K.L.M., a minor, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4128

)

SUPER DISCOUNT PHARMACY, LLC, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 25, 2020. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Elizabeth G. Rice, 

Judge.

Carlos R. Diez Arguelles and Maria D. 

Tejedor of Diez Arguelles & Tejedor, 

Orlando; Mark R. Berlick of Bolin Law 

Group, Tampa; and Wendy S. Loquasto and 

Susan W. Fox of Fox & Loquasto, 

LLC, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Thomas A. Valdez and Todd M. Smayda of 

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellee Super Discount 

Pharmacy.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE and BLACK, JJ., and CASE, JAMES, R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, 

Concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 25, 2011 |  | /s/ Edward J. Schneider
|               |  | Edward J. Schneider    
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 4:18-cv-00136-CKJ-PSOT Document 5 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:18-cv-00136-CKJ-PSOT Document 5 Filed 03/22/18 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:18-cv-00136-CKJ-PSOT Document 5 Filed 03/22/18 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:18-cv-00136-CKJ-PSOT Document 5 Filed 03/22/18 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:18-cv-00136-CKJ-PSOT Document 5 Filed 03/22/18 Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit 32.2

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2015 (the
Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat
|Name:          |  | Aviv Efrat             
|Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:          |  | May 6, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         11550
<SECURITIES>                                   17461
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19784<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    7717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               60582
<PP&E>                                         36032<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20649
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       181
<OTHER-SE>                                     61872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103146
<SALES>                                        101877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101877
<CGS>                                          48684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  48684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10581<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10364
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5941
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .24


<FN>
<F1>Net of  allowance  for doubtful  accounts,  consistent  with  balance  sheet
presentation.
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation, consistent with balance sheet
presentation.
<F3>Research and development expenses
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CX2 Technologies., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael B. Rand Chief Executive Officer, President, and Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

Date: November 18, 2008

 

|   | /s/ Michael B. Rand                                                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael B. Rand Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Executive, |
|   | Financial and Accounting Officer                                         |

 

 18

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Lee Stein (#12368)

lee@mscclaw.com

Anne M. Chapman (#025965) 

anne@mscclaw.com

Anna H. Finn (#026738)

Afinn@mscclaw.com

MITCHELL | STEIN | CAREY | CHAPMAN, PC

One Renaissance Square

2 North Central Avenue, Suite 1450

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Telephone: (602) 358-0292

Facsimile: (602) 358-0291

Attorneys for Henze Cook Murphy, PLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. Michael Lacey, and

2. James Larkin,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE 

OF COUNSEL

Anna H. Finn, of the law firm of Mitchell Stein Carey Chapman, PC, enters 

her Limited Notice of Appearance on behalf of Henze Cook Murphy, PLC in the abovecaptioned matter for the limited purpose of addressing matters involving the United 

States’ Motion to Disqualify Counsel filed on April 25, 2015 (Doc. 118).

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on June 6, 2018.

MITCHELL | STEIN | CAREY | CHAPMAN, PC

By: /s/ Anna H. Finn 

Lee Stein

Anne Chapman

Anna H. Finn

Attorneys for Henze Cook Murphy, PLC

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 175 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 6th day of June, 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF 

version of this document to the Clerk of Court, using the CM/ECF System, for filing and 

for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys of record.

/s/ Julie Greenwood

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 175 Filed 06/06/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)**




--------------------------------------------------------------------




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Card Activation Technologies, Inc.
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
      P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:






(1)       
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)       
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






Registrant
            *Card
                Activation Technologies, Inc.*Date:
                August 14, 2007
            *By:
                /s/ William P. Williams*William
                P. WilliamsChief
                Financial Officer
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, F'11,IRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

RODNEY WHITE

In Re: Rodney White, applying

Judicial District Court, 

No. 299127. 

NO. 2023 KW 0062

MARCH 27, 2023

for supervisory

Parish of East

I

I

writs, 19th

Baton Rouge, 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLE~, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. There is no record of an application for

postconviction relief, allegedly filed on November 28, 2019. 

The record of the East Baton Rouge Parish Office of the Clerk of

Court shows that on January 18, 2023,, the commissioner ordered

the district attorney to file any prqcedural objections or an

answer to relator's application for po9tconviction relief, filed

on May 11, 2021, and supplemented on'May 26, 2021. Therefore, 

I

the district court is moving toward 1 disposition of relator's

postconviction relief application. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

JMG

EW

SMM

I
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL BAILEY

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

KEVIN M. RAPP (Ariz. Bar No. 014249, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov)

MARGARET PERLMETER (Ariz. Bar No. 024805, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov)

PETER S. KOZINETS (Ariz. Bar No. 019856, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov) 

ANDREW C. STONE (Ariz. Bar No. 026543, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov)

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone (602) 514-7500

DAN G. BOYLE (N.Y. Bar No. 5216825, daniel.boyle2@usdoj.gov) 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

312 N. Spring Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90012

Telephone (213) 894-2426

BRIAN C. RABBITT 

Assistant Attorney General 

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES (Miss. Bar No. 102806, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov) 

Senior Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Room 2116

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone (202) 616-2807 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SMB

NOTICE OF

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

NOTICE is hereby given, in accordance with Local Rule 83.3(a) of the Rules of 

Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, that Special 

Assistant United States Attorney Daniel Boyle is substituted as counsel in place of Special

Assistant United States Attorney John Kucera as an attorney for the United States in the 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1082 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 3
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

above-captioned matter.

Respectfully submitted this 29th day of October, 2020.

MICHAEL BAILEY

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

 s/ Daniel Boyle DANIEL BOYLE

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1082 Filed 10/29/20 Page 2 of 3
- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 29, 2020, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

s/ Joy Faraj .

Joy Faraj

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1082 Filed 10/29/20 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Peter Strojnik, State Bar No. 6464

STROJNIK P.C.

2375 East Camelback Road Suite 600

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone: (602) 524-6602

ADA@strojnik.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Tempe Hotel Properties LLC,

Defendant.

Case No: 2:18-cv-00900-SPL

RESPONSE TO ORDER DOC 9

Defendant was served with process on March 30, 2018. See Doc 8. Defendant has 

failed to plead or otherwise defend. Therefore, Plaintiff has requested that the Clerk enter 

Defendant’s default. Doc 10.

This action should not be dismissed for the reason that Plaintiff seeks default 

against Defendant in the ordinary course of business.

A Notice of Service of this and other documents shall follow.

DATED this 1

st day of May 2018.

STROJNIK, P.C.

Peter Strojnik, 6464

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:18-cv-00900-SPL Document 11 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Tunney ATKINS, a/k/a, Adkins & Akins, Defendant/Appellant. Tunney ATKINS, a/k/a, Adkins & Akins, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 62754, 67699.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 14, 1995.

Deborah B. Wafer, Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

■ Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Special Judge.

*771*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMol986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMol986. He was sentenced by the court to consecutive prison terms of fifteen years and three years, respectively. He also appeals the motion court’s judgment denying Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant addresses no points on appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief; that appeal is considered abandoned. *See State v. Nelson,*818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991). We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error on direct appeal to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2(1)  STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350  I, Ken
Owyang, the Chief Financial Officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the Company),
certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the
United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,  (i) the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /S/   KEN OWYANGKen OwyangChief Financial Officer and Senior
  Vice President of
  Finance and AdministrationDate:  March 12,
  2008  A
signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has
been provided to SupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.  
 (1)The
material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 32.1  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Opencell Biomed Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   July 20, 2009 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Radio One, Inc. (the Company)
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 10, 2004



|       |  |                                                     
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    Scott R. Royster                             
|Name:  |  | Scott R. Royster                                    
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radio One, Inc. and will be retained by Radio One, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 28, 2008



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Billy C. Duvall                     
|Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.