alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| NAME      OF COMPANY                                                         |   | JURISDICTION      OF INCORPORATION |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Shantou      Airlines Company Limited                                        |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Zhuhai      Airlines Company Limited                                         |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Xiamen      Airlines Company Limited                                         |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Guizhou      Airlines Company Limited                                        |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Chongqing      Airlines Company Limited                                      |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Guangzhou      Air Cargo Company Limited                                     |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Guangzhou      Nanland  Air Catering Company Limited               |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| China      Southern West  Australian Flying College Pty    Limited |   | Australia                          |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Guangzhou      Baiyun International Logistics Company Limited                |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Xinjiang      Civil Aviation Property Management Limited                     |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Southern      Airlines Group Air Catering Company Limited                    |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Nan      Lung International Freight Company Limited                          |   | Hong      Kong                     |

----
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Equity Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raimundo Dias , Chief Executive Officer, President, and Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge :

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the period covered by the Report.

Date:  November 22, 2010

 

/s/ Raimundo Dias

 

 

Raimundo Dias

 

Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Cortez BROWN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67743.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied May 28, 1996.

Deborah B. Wafer, District Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of felony possession of cocaine base and misdemeanor possession of marijuana, in violation of § 195.202, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to four years and one year concurrently.

On appeal, defendant alleges the trial court erred in overruling his *Batson*challenge to one juror. We have examined the record and find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying his challenge.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1109 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1
exv10w28






EXHIBIT 10.28




AMENDMENT TWO

TO THE

PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN




     This Amendment Two (the “Amendment”) to that certain Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”) of
Perot Systems Corporation (the “Company”) is made as of December 22, 2008. Capitalized terms used
herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Plan or the
applicable Restricted Stock Agreement.



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) desires to amend the Plan to
comply with the applicable requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the “ Code”); and



     WHEREAS, Section 1 of the Plan provides that the Board is authorized to amend the terms of the
Plan.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended in the following respects:



     Section 5 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of Section 5(c):



          “Notwithstanding the foregoing, any restrictions or conditions on the Restricted Stock issued
to a Participant which grants the Company the option to repurchase the Restricted Stock may not be
exercised unless the repurchase price is not greater than 100% of the current Market Value of the
Restricted Stock at the time of repurchase.”




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused the execution of this Amendment on this
22nd day of December, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Peter Altabef 	 
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	
 	 
	 	 	Thomas D. Williams 	 
	 	 	Vice President, General Counsel and

Secretary
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
certificate is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ F. Stephen MillerF. Stephen Miller, Chairman of the Board ofDirectors and Chief Executive Officer
  (3)
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
certificate is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a)); and(4)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ M. Shellie FugateM. Shellie Fugate, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 10.23**

**ITC^DeltaCom, Inc.**

**Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation**

Non-employee directors of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. (the “Company”) who are not members of or affiliated with the Welsh, Carson, Anderson &Stowe group of the Company’s stockholders or with Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC receive cash fees for their service on the board of directors of the Company and on committees of the board. All independent directors are eligible to receiveequity-based fees pursuant to the ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan for their board and committee service. 

Independent directors receive annual fees of $30,000, fees of $1,000 for each board or committee meeting attended in person and fees of $500 for each board or committee meeting attended by conference telephone. The chairman of the auditcommittee receives an additional annual fee of $5,000. All such fees are paid in cash. All directors are entitled to reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenditures incurred in connection with their board and committee service.

Independent directors also are eligible to receive awards of restricted stock units and other awards pursuant to the Amended and RestatedStock Incentive Plan upon their initial appointment to the board of directors and from time to time thereafter. Such awards, if any, are made at the discretion of the board.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

CR-18-422-PHX-SPL (BSB) 

ORDER

Upon the motion of the United States, and good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED granting the United States’ motion to transfer cases.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that United States v. Carl Ferrer, No. CR 18-464-

PHX-DJH (JZB), will hereafter be assigned to this Court and captioned as United States 

v. Carl Ferrer, No. CR 18-464-PHX-SPL (BSB).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that United States v. Backpage.com, LLC et al., 

No. CR 18-465-PHX-DJH (JZB), will hereafter be assigned to this Court and captioned 

as United States v. Backpage.com, LLC et al., No. CR 18-465-PHX-SPL (BSB).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) is 

found to commence from _________________ through __________________.

SO ORDERED this _______ day of __________, 2018.

_____________________________________

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 164-1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HON. STEVEN P. LOGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 164-1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 

1 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1948-3 Filed 11/08/23 Page 1 of 2
From: David Morgan, Publisher

To: Mags_Everette@azd.uscourts.gov

Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Availability of Exhibits ( BackPage trial)

Date: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 3:23:24 PM

Ms Everett,

Seems like I asked this previously but I’m still not clear how to get access to admitted (and

non-admitted?) exhibits during and/or after trial.

I recall the Clerk’s office telling me that exhibits are not available to me via their system and

that exhibits are returned to the respective attorneys at the end of trial.

But the Clerk is clearly at least the temporary custodian of copies of the exhibits and has them

in a computer system. Many are publicly displayed during trial, evidently in/from a system

within the control of the courtroom clerk.

Can you help me find and understand the procedures followed and the rules the govern the

handling and public availability of exhibits by the Clerk’s office.

Please advise.

Thanks,

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1948-3 Filed 11/08/23 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-CR-00422-PHX-SMB

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Motion to Partially Vacate Seizure Warrants 

and Release Funds to Defendants (“Motion”) and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is granted.

The Court hereby vacates the seizure warrants restraining assets belonging to the 

Defendants, to the extent they restrain funds tied to the “VMG Depository Account Funds” 

and the “Attorney Retainer Funds,” and orders the government to release those funds to the 

Defendants.

As to the “Foreign Loan Payments,” those funds are not tainted or otherwise subject 

to pre-trial seizure or restraint. Accordingly, the government is ordered to release any seized 

funds traceable to the “Foreign Loan Payments.”

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1366-17 Filed 10/26/21 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO PARTIALLY VACATE SEIZURE WARRANTS AND 

RELEASE FUNDS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

As to the “Non-Adult Advertising Proceeds,” those funds are not tainted or otherwise 

subject to pre-trial seizure or restraint. Accordingly, the government is ordered to release any 

seized funds traceable to the “Non-Adult Advertising Proceeds.”

DATED this day of , 20 .

 

HON. SUSAN M. BRNOVICH

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1366-17 Filed 10/26/21 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification****of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                David BergerDavid
                BergerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerMay
                20, 2008
----

| Northway                Financial, Inc2005                Annual report on Form 10-KSubsidiaries                of the Registrant |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |   |
| Name                of Significant Subsidiary                                                                                     |   | %                Owned |   | Jurisdiction                of Incorporation |
|                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |   |
| Northway                Bank                                                                                                      |   | 100 |   | New                Hampshire |
| Northway                Capital Trust I                                                                                           |   | 100 |   | Delaware |
| Northway                Capital Trust II                                                                                          |   | 100 |   | Delaware |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This financial data schedule contains financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets of ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 nad
the related consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December
31, 1998. This information is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         184,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,260
<INVENTORY>                                      1,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,158
<PP&E>                                         315,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 587,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,040
<BONDS>                                        416,859
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                           513
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   587,517
<SALES>                                        171,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,838
<CGS>                                           82,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (32,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6,454)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (34,342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (8,436)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (34,342)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.67)
        

</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 866 

Expressing support for designation of a National Veterans History Project 

Week to encourage public participation in a nationwide project that 

collects and preserves the stories of the men and women who served 

our Nation in times of war and conflict. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2009 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. WAMP) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of a National Veterans 

History Project Week to encourage public participation 

in a nationwide project that collects and preserves the 

stories of the men and women who served our Nation 

in times of war and conflict. 

Whereas the Veterans History Project was established by a 

unanimous vote of the United States Congress to collect 

and preserve the wartime stories of American veterans; 

Whereas Congress charged the American Folklife Center at 

the Library of Congress to undertake the Veterans History Project and to engage the public in the creation of 

a collection of oral histories that would be a lasting tribute to individual veterans and an abundant resource for 

scholars; 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 866 IH 

Whereas there are 17,000,000 wartime veterans in America 

whose stories can educate people of all ages about important moments and events in the history of the United 

States and the world and provide instructive narratives 

that illuminate the meanings of ‘‘service’’, ‘‘sacrifice’’, 

‘‘citizenship’’, and ‘‘democracy’’; 

Whereas the Veterans History Project relies on a corps of 

volunteer interviewers, partner organizations, and an 

array of civic minded institutions nationwide who interview veterans according to the guidelines it provides; 

Whereas increasing public participation in the Veterans History Project will increase the number of oral histories 

that can be collected and preserved and increase the 

number of veterans it so honors; and 

Whereas ‘‘National Veterans Awareness Week’’ commendably 

preceded this resolution in the years 2005 and 2006: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes ‘‘National Veterans Awareness 

3 Week’’; 

4 (2) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

5 Veterans History Project Week’’; 

6 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

7 interview at least one veteran in their families or 

8 communities according to guidelines provided by the 

9 Veterans History Project; and 

10 (4) encourages local, State, and national orga11 nizations along with Federal, State, city and county 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HRES 866 IH 

1 governmental institutions to participate in support 

2 of the effort to document, preserve, and honor the 

3 service of American wartime veterans. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Clement Leo BEZOLD, Jr., Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 94-SC-196-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

July 21, 1994.

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

On recommendation of the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association, Clement Leo Bezold, Jr., is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.

Mr. Bezold shall pay any costs incurred by the Kentucky Bar Association in the processing of the application.

ENTERED: July 21, 1994.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens ROBERT F. STEPHENS, Chief Justice