alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11

                   KSL RECREATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           (in thousands, except share and per share data)
                                                                                        YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,

                                                                                 2000           1999           1998
                                                                                 ----           ----           ----
<S>                                                                            <C>            <C>            <C>
NET INCOME................................................................     $   16,140     $   23,332     $   14,114
                                                                               ==========     ==========     ==========

DATA AS TO NUMBER OF COMMON AND COMMON
EQUIVALENT SHARES:
   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding...................          1,000          1,000          1,000
   Common equivalent shares...............................................              -              -              -
                                                                               ----------     ----------     ----------


   Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
   Outstanding............................................................          1,000          1,000          1,000
                                                                               ==========     ==========     ==========

EARNINGS PER SHARE - Basic & Diluted......................................     $   16,140     $   23,332     $   14,114
                                                                               ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9APPEAL 9CRIMINAL

9NON-APPEAL 9CIVIL

9CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (6SHFLI\)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

3') HPDLO

$6&,, HPDLO

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025( 7+$1 21( )250$7, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Joy Bertrand 602374532108-03-21

Joy Bertrand, Esq., LLC

PO Box 2734 Scottsdale

AZ 85252-2734

CR18-422

Brnnovich

07-16-21

US v. Lacey, et al. Phoenix AZ

✔

✔ Hearing 7-16-21

transcript already prepared

requesting copy

✔ ✔

joyous@mailbag.com

s/Joy Bertrand

08-03-21

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1190 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated February 13,
2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Vasogen Inc. as at
November 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended November 30, 2005 and for the period from December 1, 1987 to
November 30, 2005, and Comments by Auditors for United States Readers on Canada
- United States Reporting Difference in the following:

      (i)   the annual report on Form 40-F of Vasogen Inc. (the "Company") for
            the year ended November 30, 2005, and

      (ii)  the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company, filed with
            the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2005 (File No.
            333-124226)

Our reports appear in the Form 6-K of Vasogen Inc. dated February 14, 2006.


/S/ KPMG LLP

Toronto, Canada
February 21, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ Aviv Efrat           
|Aviv Efrat August 5, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 733 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 733

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 23, 2009.
Whereas Typhoon Morakot hit the island of Taiwan on August 8, 2009, dropping 
        approximately 2.6 meters or 102 inches of rain, more than half the 
        average annual rainfall in many places;
Whereas central and southern Taiwan were hardest hit by the storm;
Whereas mudslides overwhelmed some places in south Taiwan, including the village 
        of Hsiaolin, where 247 homes were lost;
Whereas floods or mudslides damaged more than 191,936 homes;
Whereas infrastructure and farm losses alone have totaled approximately 
        $46,500,000,000 in Taiwanese dollars to date;
Whereas the devastation left by Typhoon Morakot is the worst the island has seen 
        in 50 years;
Whereas as of late August 2009, the official death toll reached 602 with an 
        additional 81 missing, where many of those are believed to be buried by 
        mud in the village of Hsiaolin, which was almost completely covered in a 
        mudslide triggered by several days of extremely heavy rainfall;
Whereas beginning on August 22, 2009, Taiwan held a three-day mourning period in 
        memory of those who were killed in mudslides and floods after Typhoon 
        Morakot;
Whereas the United States assisted efforts by providing Marine Corps C-130 
        aircraft from Marine Corps Air Station Futenma on Okinawa to deliver 
        humanitarian relief supplies in addition to KC-130 aircraft and MH 53 
        and MH 60 helicopters from strategic United States bases located in 
        Japan;
Whereas on March 24, 2009, the House of Representatives passed H. Con. Res. 55 
        to mark the 30th anniversary of the enactment of the Taiwan Relations 
        Act (Public Law 96-8), codifying in law the basis for continued 
        commercial, cultural, and other relations between the United States and 
        the Republic of China (Taiwan); and
Whereas Taiwan has been a steadfast ally of the United States and a responsible 
        and compassionate member of the world community: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) mourns the terrible loss of life caused by Typhoon Morakot that 
        occurred on August 8, 2009, in Taiwan;
            (2) expresses its deepest condolences to the families of the many 
        victims;
            (3) recognizes the deep ties between the United States and Taiwan 
        and expresses continued solidarity with its people during this time of 
        crisis; and
            (4) expresses gratitude to the people of the United States who have 
        generously supported those humanitarian aid agencies working to assist 
        the people of Taiwan in this time of need.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BEA HUML,

Appellant,

v.

BEVERLY MITRISIN, INDIVIDUALLY,

and JACK O’BOYLE, ESQ.,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00071

- CV

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCV06334)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the re was no error in the

summary judgment orders. We therefore affirm the judgments of the court below. It appearing

to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other order

with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, Senior Judge

Larsen, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Dongmei Wu, the Chief Financial Officer of
CHINA SKYRISE DIGITAL SERVICE INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 19th day of November, 2009.

| | /s/ Dongmei Wu               
| | -----------------------------
| | Dongmei Wu                   
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and will be retained
by China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Opencell Biodmed, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: July 31, 2009 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
Case 4:18-cv-00111-RCC-PSOT Document 3 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 1
WHEATLAND TUBE COMPANY and

ALLIED TUBE & CONDUIT CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

and

SAHA THAI STEEL PIPE COMPANY, LTD.,

Defendant-Intervenor.

Slip Op. 06-71

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: GREGORY W. CARMAN, JUDGE

Court No. 04-00568

JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the United States Department of Commerce’s Final Results of

Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”) filed March 1, 2006, pursuant

to the Court’s decision in Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, 30 CIT __, 414 F. Supp. 2d 1271

(2006); and upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Judgment Upholding the Remand;

and upon all other papers filed herein; and upon due deliberation, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Judgment Upholding Remand is granted;

and it is further
ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained in all respects.

SO ORDERED.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel for the

parties.

/s/ Gregory W. Carman 

Gregory W. Carman

Dated: 16th day of May 2006

New York, New York
Description of Long-Term Disability Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.16 
 DESCRIPTION OF LONG-TERM DISABILITY ARRANGEMENTS 
 The Company
makes available an executive disability coverage program to provide disability benefits to the named executive officers and other management employees. The executive disability coverage is designed to replace 66  2/3% of the base salary, bonuses and incentive
compensation of the employee up to a maximum of $25,000 per month benefit. Under the executive disability coverage, the employee pays for the premiums. 
 In addition to the above coverage, the Company provides supplemental disability coverage for Felix E. Wright, David S. Haffner and Karl G. Glassman under various policies. This supplemental disability coverage provides the following
benefits: 
  

											
	 Name
	  	Current Age	  	Annual Premiums*	  	Monthly Benefit	  	Benefit Period
	 Felix E. Wright
	  	73	  	$	8,715	  	$	20,000	  	24 months
	 David S. Haffner
	  	56	  	$	4,874	  	$	16,300	  	Until Age 65
	 Karl G. Glassman
	  	50	  	$	1,185	  	$	4,200	  	Until Age 65

  

	*	Under the supplemental disability coverage, the Company pays for the premium.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Alfonso Lopez-Millan, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Carla Hacker-Agnew, et al., 

Respondents. 

NO. CV-18-0486-PHX-SPL (DMF) 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

TO THE HONORABLE STEVEN P. LOGAN, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE: 

 Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, a petitioner may not file a second or successive § 2254 

petition in the district court unless the petitioner has obtained a certification from the Ninth 

Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing the district court to consider the second or subsequent 

§ 2254 petition. A habeas petition is “‘second or successive’ if it raises claims that were 

or could have been adjudicated on their merits in an earlier petition.” Cooper v. Calderon, 

274 F.3d 1270, 1273 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam). Petitioner has previously challenged his 

conviction in a prior habeas corpus petition (Docs. 10, 13). The current petition, therefore, 

is second or successive. Petitioner has not presented a certification from the Ninth Circuit 

authorizing the Court to consider a second or successive § 2254 petition. Accordingly, the 

current Petition and this action should be dismissed as a successive petition. 

. . . 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Alfonso Lopez-Millan’s Petition 

for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice. 

 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss be 

granted. (Doc. 13) 

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because dismissal of the 

Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the 

ruling debatable. 

This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth 

Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court’s judgment. The 

parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation 

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. See, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 

Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen 

days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure timely to file objections to 

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the 

Report and Recommendation by the district court without further review. See United States 

v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Failure timely to file objections to 

any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party’s 

right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to 

the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Dated this 13th day of July, 2018.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      15, 2010 | /s/ DARRELL      W. CAIN                                   |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Darrell      W. Cain                                            |
|                                    | Chief      Executive Officer,                                   |
|                                    | III      to I International MaritimeSolutions      Cayman, Inc. |

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti
      William Uusiheimala, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
                Antti William UusiheimalaAntti
                William Uusiheimala
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              November
                1, 2007