Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 116 / Friday, June 14, 1996 / Notices 30233

the Diverse Habitat Components and

Coastal River Ecosystem, Great Pee

Dee and Waccamaw Rivers,

Georgetown, Horry and Marion

Counties, SC, Due: July 31, 1996,

Contact: Charles R. Danner (800) 419–

9582.

EIS No. 960267, DRAFT EIS, NPS, NH,

Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site,

General Management Plan and

Development Concept Plan,

Implementation, Sullivan County,

NH, Due: July 29, 1996, Contact: John

Reber (303) 969–2418.

EIS No. 960268, DRAFT EIS, USN, FL,

VA, USS SEAWOLF Submarine

Shock Testing, Implementation,

located Offshore Mayport, FL or

Norfolk, VA, Due: July 29, 1996,

Contact: Will Sloger (803) 820–5797.

EIS No. 960269, FINAL EIS, FTA, CA,

San Francisco International Airport

Extension, Transportation

Improvements, Bay Area Rapid

Transit District (BART) Funding, San

Mateo County, CA, Due: July 15, 1996,

Contact: Robert Hom (415) 744–3116.

EIS No. 960270, DRAFT EIS, TVA, TN,

Kingston Fossil Plant Alternative Coal

Receiving Systems, New Rail Spur

Construction near the Cities of

Kingston and Harriman, Roane

County, TN, Due: July 8, 1996,

Contact: David W. Robinson (423)

751–2502.

The above EIS should have appeared

in the May 24, 1996 Federal Register.

The 45 day Comment Period is

Calculated from the Intended Federal

Register Date of May 24, 1996.

Dated: June 11, 1996.

B. Katherine Biggs,

Associate Director, NEPA Compliance

Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 96–15203 Filed 6–13–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[ER–FRL–5470–5]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared May 28, 1996 through May 31,

1996 pursuant to the Environmental

Review Process (ERP), under Section

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities at

(202) 564–7167.

An explanation of the ratings assigned

to draft environmental impact

statements (EISs) was published in FR

dated April 5, 1996 (61 FR 15251).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–AFS–K61141–CA Rating

EC2, Snowcreek Golf Course Expansion,

Construction and Operation, Special

Use Permit, Inyo National Forest System

Lands, Mono County, CA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns with the

separate environmental evaluation of

the related Snowcreek ski area and

Snowcreek golf course projects, the

need for the golf course, water quality

and quantity, and potential impacts to

wildlife habitat. The final EIS should

develop mitigation measures for

potential cumulative impacts.

ERP No. D–AFS–K65181–CA Rating

EC2, Sequoia National Forest Land and

Resource Management Plan,

Amendment ‘‘Grazing Management’’,

Implementation, Kern, Tulare and

Fresno Counties, CA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns with the

preferred alternative. It does not address

forage utilization or an all season

monitoring plan which allows for

adaptive management.

ERP No. D–AFS–L65261–AK Rating

EC2, Port Houghton/Cape Fanshaw

Timber Harvest Sale Project,

Implementation, Tongass National

Forest, Chatham and Stikine Areas,

South of Juneau, AK.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

project impacts on water quality and the

marine environment.

ERP No. D–BLM–K67034–NV Rating

EO2, Talapoosa Gold Mine Project,

Construction and Operation, Plan of

Operations Approval, Special-UsePermit and COE Section 404 Permit

Issuance, Silver Springs, Lyon County,

NV.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental objections due to

potential groundwater and post-mining

pit lake impacts. EPA requested

additional information on groundwater

modeling, pit water quality, ecological

risk assessment, geochemical

characterization and waste rock

disposal, seepage rates from waste rock

dumps, facilities design and

reclamation, and mitigation measures.

ERP No. D–DOE–L09807–WA Rating

EC2, Hanford Site K Basins Management

of Spent Nuclear Fuel, Storage and

Disposal, Application for Approval of

Construction and NPDES Permit

Issuance, Columbia River, Richland,

Benton County, WA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

permitting, accidential releases, and

economic analysis.

ERP No. D–OSM–E67003–TN Rating

EC2, Fern Lake Petition Area for Surface

Coal Mining Operations, Designation or

Undesignation as Unsuitable for Coal

Mining Operations, Claiborne County,

TN.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns over surface

mining in the Fern Lake watershed

because of potential adverse impacts to

water quality, aquatic life and the water

supply for the City of Middlesboro.

ERP No. DS–NPS–K61126–AZ Rating

LO, Tumacacori National Historical

Park General Management Plan,

Additional Information, Santa Cruz

County, AZ.

Summary: EPA expressed a lack of

objections with the new preferred

alternative.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–K67031–NV. Dash

Open Pit and Underground Mining

Project, Implementation, Expanding

existing Gold Mining Operations at the

Jerritt Canyon Project, Plan of Operation

Approval and COE Section 404 Permit,

Humboldt Toiyabe National Forest,

Independence Mountain Range, Elko

County, NV.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

potential water quality impacts and

recommended that the Forest Service

conduct modeling to predict the

concentrations and effects of

contaminants in streams. EPA also

expressed concern regarding the

placement of waste rock in waters of the

United States and the need for

additional information on mitigation

measures for this activity.

ERP No. F–BLM–K67020–AZ. Cyprus

Bagdad Copper Mine, Mill Tailings and

Waste Rock Storage Expansion, Plan of

Operation Approval, NPDES and COE

Section 404 Permits Issuance, Yavapai

County, AZ.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental objections about the

project as proposed. EPA recommended

that quantitative modeling of the postproject quality of pit water be conducted

prior to BLM’s Record of Decision.

Mitigation of and monitoring for

impacts to waters of the U.S. should

have been addressed in the EIS and EPA

suggests that the mitigation and

monitoring plan be discussed in the

Record of Decision.

ERP No. F–BLM–K67032–NV. Round

Mountain Mine Mill and Tailings

Facility, Construction and Operation for

the Smoke Valley Operation, Plan of

Operations Amendment Approval, Nye

County, NV.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental objections regarding

cumulative impacts of the proposed

project effectiveness of mitigation
30234 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 116 / Friday, June 14, 1996 / Notices

measures and suggested that the Plan of

Operation provide an appropriate

opportunity for BLM and the State of

Nevada to collect a contingency fund,

which may be necessary for future

remedial action, based on the predicted

pit lake water quality.

Dated: June 11, 1996.

B. Katherine Biggs,

Associate Director, NEPA Compliance

Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 96–15204 Filed 6–13–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[OPP–30412; FRL–5373–7]

Certain Companies; Applications to

Register Pesticide Products

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt

of applications to register pesticide

products containing active ingredients

not included in any previously

registered products, except for the

chemical ethepon which is currently

registered on cotton pursuant to the

provisions of section 3(c)(4) of the

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended.

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted by July 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written

comments identified by the document

control number [OPP–30412] and the

file symbol to: Public Response and

Program Resources Branch, Field

Operations Divisions (7506C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring

comments to: Environmental Protection

Agency, Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921

Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.

Comments and data may also be

submitted electronically by sending

electronic mail (e-mail) to: oppdocket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic

comments must be submitted as an

ASCII file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Comments and data will be accepted on

disks in Wordperfect in 5.1 file format

or ASCII file format. All comments and

data in electronic form must be

identified by the docket number [OPP–

30412]. No ‘‘Confidential Business

Information’’ (CBI) should be submitted

through e-mail. Electronic comments on

this notice may be filed online at many

Federal Depository Libraries. Additional

information on electronic submission

can be found below in this document.

Information submitted as a comment

concerning this notice may be claimed

confidential by marking any part or all

of that information as ‘‘Confidential

Business Information’’ (CBI).

Information so marked will not be

disclosed except in accordance with

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

A copy of the comment that does not

contain CBI must be submitted for

inclusion in the public record.

Information not marked confidential

may be disclosed publicly by EPA

without prior notice. All written

comments will be available for public

inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address

given above, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding

holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Registration Division (7505C),

Attn: (Product Manager (PM) named in

each registration), Office of Pesticide

Programs, 401 M St., SW., Washington,

DC 20460.

In person: Contact the PM named in

each registration at the following office

location/telephone number:

Product Manager Office location/telephone number Address

PM 13 George LaRocca, Rm. 204, CM #2 (703–305–6100); e-mail:

larocca.george@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency

1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy

Arlington, VA 22202

PM 22 Cynthia Giles-Parker, Rm. 229, CM #2 (703–305–5540); e-mail:

giles-parker.cynthiajames@epamail.epa.gov

-DoSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA

received applications as follows to

register pesticide products containing

active ingredients not included in any

previously registered products, except

for the chemical ethepon which is

currently registered on cotton pursuant

to the provisions of section 3(c)(4) of

FIFRA. Notice of receipt of these

applications does not imply a decision

by the Agency on the applications.

Products Containing Active Ingredients

Not Included In Any Previously

Registered Products

1. File Symbol: 10308–EU. Applicant:

Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited

5-33 Kitahama, 4-Chome, Chou-Ku

Osaka 541, Japan. Product name: Pralle.

Insecticide. Active ingredient: [2,5-

Dioxo-3-(2-propynyl)-

imidazolidinyl]methyl (1RS)-cis,transchrysanthemate at 50.5 percent.

Proposed classification/Use: None. For

formulation use only. Type registration:

Conditional. (PM 13)

2. File Symbol: 1021–RAIN.

Applicant: McLaughlin Gormley King

Company, 8810 Tenth Avenue North,

Minneapolis, MN 55427. Product name:

Multicide Intermediate 2734.

Insecticide. Active ingredients:

Imiprothrin [2,5-Dioxo-3-(2-propynyl)-

imidazolidinyl]-methyl (1RS)-cis,transchrysanthemate at 16.00 percent, 3-

phenoxybenzyl-(1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-2,2-

dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl)

cyclopropanecarboxylate at 11.20

percent, and N-octyl bicycloheptene

dicarboximide at 20.00 percent.

Proposed classification/Use: None. For

manufacturing use only. Type

registration: Conditional. (PM 13)

3. File Symbol: 1021–RATO.

Applicant: McLaughlin Gormley King

Co. Product name: Multicide

Pressurized Roach Spray 27341.

Insecticide. Active ingredients:

Imiprothrin [2,5-Dioxo-3-(2-propynyl)-

imidazolidinyl]-methyl (1RS)-cis,transchrysanthemate at 0.400 percent, 3-

phenoxybenzyl-(1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-2,2-

dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl)

cyclopropanecarboxylate at 0.500

percent, and N-octyl bicycloheptene

dicarboximide at 1.000 percent.

Proposed classification/Use: None. For

indoor use on ants, cockroaches,

crickets, and other pests. Type

registration: Conditional. (PM 13)

4. File Symbol: 4822–UUT. Applicant:

S.C. Johnson and Son, Inc., Racine, WI

53403–2236. Product name: Raid Ant

and Roach 17. Insecticide. Active

ingredients: Imiprothrin [2,4-Dioxo-1-

(prop-2-ynyl)-imidazolidin-3-ylmethyl

(1R)-cis,trans-chrysanthemate at 0.100

percent and cypermethrin [cyano (3-

phenoxyphenyl)methyl 3-(2,2-

dichloroethenyl)-2,2

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate at

0.100 percent. Proposed classification/

Use: None. For household use. Type

registration: Conditional. (PM 13)