31938 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 121 / Friday, June 21, 1996 / Notices

Milling, Manufacturing, and

Fabricating:

Average Estimated Hours/Response:

0.25.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

430.

Average Frequency of Response: 442.

Estimated Annual Hour Burden:

47,472.

Demolition and Renovation:

Average Estimated Hours/Response:

0.75.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

6,900.

Frequency of Response: 58.

Estimated Annual Hour Burden:

298,483.

Waste Disposal:

Average estimated Hours/Response:

1.5.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

3,017.

Frequency of Response: 18.

Estimated Annual Hour Burden:

82,431.

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:

428,386 hours.

Estimated Total Annualized Cost

Burden: $0.

Send comments on the Agency’s need

for this information, the accuracy of the

provided burden estimates, and any

suggested methods for minimizing

respondent burden, including through

the use of automated collection

techniques to the following addresses:

(Please refer to EPA ICR No. 0111.08

and OMB Control No. 2060–0101 in any

correspondence.)

Ms. Sandy Farmer, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, OPPE Regulatory

Information Division (2137), 401 M

Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460

and

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and

Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for

EPA, 725 17th Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: June 14, 1996.

Joseph Retzer,

Director, Regulatory Information Division.

[FR Doc. 96–15889 Filed 6–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[ER–FRL–5470–7]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared June 10, 1996 through June 14,

1996 pursuant to the Environmental

Review Process (ERP), under Section

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities at

(202) 564–7167. An explanation of the

ratings assigned to draft environmental

impact statements (EISs) was published

in FR dated April 5, 1996 (61 FR 15251).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–UAF–K11071–AZ Rating

EC2, Luke Air Force Base, Construction

and Operation of 18-Hole Golf Course,

In a Detention Basin to Prevent Flood

Damage, Dysart Drain Improvement

Project, Maricopa County, AZ.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

potential groundwater impacts and

requested that additional information on

this issue be provided.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–L65252–OR Hoodoo

Master Plan, Plan of Operation

Approval and Special-Use-Permit

Issuance, Willamette National Forest,

McKenzie Ranger District, Linn County,

OR.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–DOE–L06004–WA

Adoption—Disposal of

Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser,

Ohio Class and Los Angeles Class Naval

Reactor Plants, Site Selection, US

Department of Energy’s Hanford Site,

Benton, Franklin and Grant Counties or

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard,

Bremerton, WA.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to preparing agency.

ERP No. F–DOE–L09808–WA

Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP)

Stabilization, To Safely Reduced

Radiation Exposure to Workers and

Environment, Hanford Site, Richland,

Benton County, WA.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–DOE–L20002–WA Safe

Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes,

Double Shell Tanks (DSTs) and Cross

Site Transfer System (CSTS)

Construction, Hanford Site, Adams,

Richland, Washington, Benton and

Franklin Counties, WA.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–SFW–G99006–TX

Balcones Canyonlands Conservation

Plan, Issuance of a Permit to Allow

Incidental Take of Gold-Cheeked

Warbler, Black-capped Vireo and Six

Karst Invertebrates, Travis County, TX.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the selection of the Fish and Wildlife

Service preferred alternative as

described in the Final EIS.

ERP No. FS–OSM–G01012–NM Fence

Lake Federal Coal Project, Mining Plan,

Permit Application and Federal Permit

Approval or Disapproval, Updated

Information concerning the Salt River

Project Improvement and Power

District’s (SRP) Proposed Fence Lake

Mine, Apache County, AZ and Catron

and Cibola Counties, NM.

Summary: Review of the Final EIS has

been completed and the project found to

be satisfactory. No formal comment

letter was sent to the preparing agency.

Dated: June 18, 1996.

Ken Mittelholtz,

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 96–15929 Filed 6–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

[ER–FRL–5470–6]

Environmental Impact Statements;

Notice of Availability Responsible

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal

Activities, General Information (202)

564–7167 OR (202) 564–7153.

Weekly receipt of Environmental

Impact Statements Filed June 10, 1996

Through June 14, 1996 Pursuant to 40

CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 960271, FINAL SUPPLEMENT,

COE, NC, Wilmington Harbor Channel

Widening and Navigation

Improvement, Updated Information,

Cape Fear River, Port of Wilmington,

New Hanover and Brunswick

Counties, NC, Due: July 22, 1996,

Contact: Hugh Heine (910) 251–4070.

EIS No. 960272, DRAFT EIS, BLM, AK,

Denali National Park and Reserve,

‘‘Frontcountry’’ Entrance Area and

Road Corridor, Development Concept

Plan, AK, Due: August 19, 1996,

Contact: Mike Tranel (907) 683–9552.

EIS No. 960273, DRAFT EIS, DOI, UT,

Wasatch County Water Efficiency

Project and Daniel Replacement

Pipeline Project, Implementation,

Wasatch County, UT, Due: August 13,

1996, Contact: Karen Ricks (801) 226–

7126.

The U.S. Department of the Interior is

a Joint Lead Agency for the above

Project along with the Utah Reclamation

Mitigation and Conservation

Commission (URC).

EIS No. 960274, FINAL EIS, BLM, WY,

Moxa Arch Area Natural Gas

Development Expansion Project,