alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert Wayne BREY, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Respondent.

Nos. 95-SC-555-D, 93-CA-1430.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Jan. 10, 1996.

*ORDER*

The motion for review of the decision of the Court of Appeals is denied.

On the court’s own motion, the Clerk of the Supreme Court is hereby directed to strike from the motion for discretionary review the reference to and signature of John-nathon Smith, who is designated as “Inmate Litigator.” The rules governing the practice of law in this Commonwealth clearly provide that pleadings, motions, and other papers, including motions for discretionary review, are to be signed by the *party*or his *attorney*of record. See, *inter alia,*CR 76.20(6), CR 11, and RCr 13.04.

Future violation of the foregoing rules may result in the striking of the offending pleading, brief or motion.

KING, J., not sitting.

ENTERED January 10, 1996.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Net 1 UEPS
Technologies, Inc. (Net1) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Serge Belamant and Herman Kotze, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Net1, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and            
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                          
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Net1.





|Date: August 28, 2008 | /s/: Serge Belamant                   
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------
|                      | Name: Serge Belamant                  
|                      | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman  
|                      | of the Board                          
|                      |                                       
|Date: August 28, 2008 | /s/: Herman Kotze                     
|                      | Name: Herman Kotze                    
|                      | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
|                      | Secretary                             

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 1 12 1 4 Summary Calendar

ANGEL HENDERSON , Plaintiff

–

Appell ant,

versus GRAND PRAIRIE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant

– Appell ee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the North ern District of Texas USDC No. 4 :12

- CV

- 498

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

Angel Henderson sued her school

- district employer claiming violation of
the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), retaliation under the FMLA, and

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 2, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-11214 Document: 00512582501 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/02/2014No. 13

- 1 12 1 4
intentional infliction of emotional distress . The district court granted sum

mary judgment for the district , explaining its reasons in a thorough and con

vinc ing twenty

- four

- page opinion. While Henderson was out on medical leave, she was noti fied that she
was to be terminated . She received the full benefit of her medical leave and

w as paid for several more months, through the end of the school year, which was the term of her probationary employment contract. The district provided reasons for the termination, including that Henderson was conduct ing a pri

vate for

- profit business on school time. Before Henderson had gone out on
med i cal leave, school personnel were already concerned about her per for

mance, including, inter alia , conflicts with personnel, arriving late and leav ing early, spending time out of the classroom, and inad equate documentation and work logs. In its opinion, the district court carefully explained that the district “had concerns about plaintiff’s work performance before she requested FMLA leave, and that activities of [school] personnel related to plaintiff ’s performance while she was on FMLA leave were but part of an ongoing inquiry that was prompted by [the district’s] concerns relative to plaintiff’s work performance.” The court noted the absence of evidence showing a connection between the termination

a nd Henderson’s exercise of her FMLA rights. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons care

fully stated by the district court.

2 Case: 13-11214 Document: 00512582501 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/02/2014
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in registration statements No. 333-117956 and 333-79391 on Forms 

S-8 and No. 333-156652 on FormS-3 of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 2010, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HopFed Bancorp, Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form10-K of HopFed Bancorp, Inc and subsidiaries. 

/s/ Rayburn, Bates & Fitzgerald, P.C. 

Brentwood, Tennessee 

Date: March 31, 2010
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company, as amended, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 14, 2018.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 983 

Requesting the President, and directing the Secretary of Health and Human 

Services, to transmit to the House of Representatives copies of documents, records, and communications in their possession relating to certain agreements regarding health care reform. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. BURGESS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President, and directing the Secretary of 

Health and Human Services, to transmit to the House 

of Representatives copies of documents, records, and 

communications in their possession relating to certain 

agreements regarding health care reform. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests 

2 the President, and directs the Secretary of Health and 

3 Human Services, to transmit to the House of Representa4 tives, not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption 

5 of this resolution, copies of each portion of any document, 

6 record, or communication (including telephone and elec7 tronic mail records, logs and calendars, and records of inVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:00 Dec 18, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR983.IH HR983

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 983 IH 

1 ternal discussions) in the possession of the President or 

2 Secretary, respectively, referring or relating to— 

3 (1) any written or verbal agreement that— 

4 (A) relates to any of the following bills in 

5 the 111th Congress (or any proposed change 

6 thereto): H.R. 3200, H.R. 3590, H.R. 3961, 

7 H.R. 3962 , S. 1679, or S. 1796; and 

8 (B) is entered into on or after January 20, 

9 2009, between an individual serving in an office 

10 or position in the White House or the Depart11 ment of Health and Human Services and any 

12 other person; 

13 (2) negotiations relating to an agreement de14 scribed in paragraph (1), the name or title of any 

15 individual described in paragraph (1)(B) who par16 ticipated in decisionmaking during such negotia17 tions, the date of any meeting held as part of such 

18 negotiations, or the identity of any participant in 

19 any such meeting; 

20 (3) any such negotiations with the Advanced 

21 Medical Technology Association, the American Med22 ical Association, America’s Health Insurance Plans, 

23 the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of 

24 America, the American Hospital Association, or the 

25 Service Employees International Union regarding 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 983 IH 

1 decreasing by 1.5 percentage points the annual 

2 health care spending growth rate or policy proposals 

3 to accomplish this goal; or 

4 (4) implementation of an agreement described 

5 in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30611-30612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15315]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30612]]

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Indemnification of 
Passengers for Nonperformance of Transportation; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Performance)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility for Indemnification of 
Passengers for Nonperformance of Transportation pursuant to the 
provisions of Section 3, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. Sec. 817(e)) and 
the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 C.F.R. 
Part 540, as amended:

Radisson Seven Seas Cruises, Inc., 600 Corporate Drive, Suite 410, 
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334
Vessel: Radisson Diamond.

Dated: June 12, 1996.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15315 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32828-32829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16070]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Objective Progress Report (OPR), Administration for Native 
Americans.
    OMB No.: 0980-0155.
    Description: The information collected by the Objective Progress 
Report on an ANA grantee's project progress is needed to properly 
administer and monitor the progress of Administration for Native 
American' competitive areas grants--Social and Economic Development 
Strategies (SEDS), ANA Environmental Enhancement, and ANA Mitigation of 
Environment Impacts to Indian Lands due to Department of Defense 
Activities. This information is used to perform legislatively required 
Federal financial and program management oversight functions.
    Respondents: State, Local and Tribal Govt.

                         Annual Burden Estimates                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Average         
                                            Number of   burden    Total 
         Instrument            Number of    responses    hours    burden
                              respondents      per        per     hours 
                                           respondent  response         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPR                                 250            2          2    1,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,000.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, D.C. 
20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.

[[Page 32829]]

    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: June 19, 1996.
Larry Guerrero,
Director, Office of Information Management Services.
[FR Doc. 96-16070 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,863,254
<SECURITIES>                                   222,319
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,273,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,408,980
<PP&E>                                       4,298,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                 498,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,949,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,245,867
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,574,685)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,949,165
<SALES>                                        314,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               673,609
<CGS>                                        1,153,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,153,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               160,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,173,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,173,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,173,133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Grand Motion Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   July 14, 2008 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of SavWatt USA, Inc. ("Company")
on Form 10-Q/A  (Amendment  No. 3) for the period ended  September  30, 2010, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Isaac H. Sutton,  President and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: January 28, 2011                    /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Keith B. HAYSLETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 46190.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 29, 1992.

Lorry L. Kohrs, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from dismissal for untimely filing of Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three months ended         Year ended
                                                                          December 31,          December 31,
                                                                    ---------------------   ---------------------
                                                                       1999         1998       1999        1998
                                                                    ----------    -------   ----------    -------
<S>                                                                 <C>           <C>       <C>           <C>
Basic

   Average shares outstanding ...................................       18,998     18,532       18,930     17,854
                                                                    ==========    =======   ==========    =======

   Net income (loss) ............................................   $   (5,606)   $ 3,442   $  (19,688)   $11,570
                                                                    ==========    =======   ==========    =======

   Per share amount .............................................   $     (.30)   $   .19   $    (1.04)   $   .65
                                                                    ==========    =======   ==========    =======


Diluted

   Average shares outstanding ...................................       18,998     18,532       18,930     17,854

   Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the
     treasury stock method using the average market price .......           --      2,042           --      1,984
                                                                    ----------    -------   ----------    -------

   Total ........................................................       18,998     20,574       18,930     19,839
                                                                    ==========    =======   ==========    =======

   Net income (loss) ............................................   $   (5,606)   $ 3,442   $  (19,688)   $11,570
                                                                    ==========    =======   ==========    =======

   Per share amount .............................................   $     (.30)   $   .17   $    (1.04)   $   .58
                                                                    ==========    =======   ==========    =======
</TABLE>
1The charges against Blanton, Quintero, and Hall all arose

from the same incident. 

FILED

September 21, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) FOR PUBLICATION

)

Appellee, ) FILED: 

)

v. ) HUMPHREYS COUNTY

)

WILLIAM E. HALL and ) HON. ALLEN W. WALLACE, JUDGE

DERRICK D. QUINTERO, )

) NO. 01-S-01-9703-CC-00068

Appellants. )

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

I concur in the conclusion reached by the majority in

this case except with respect to the issue of proportionality. On

that issue, the majority holds that the punishment of death is not

disproportionate under the record in this case. I respectfully

dissent, and I do so for the same reasons outlined in State v.

Blanton, __ S.W.2d __ (Tenn. 1998), 1998 W.L. 310485 (Birch, J.,

dissenting). 

In Blanton, no direct evidence was adduced that Blanton

shot either victim or stabbed Mrs. Vester. The same analysis

applies here--there is no direct evidence that Hall or Quintero

shot either victim or stabbed Mrs. Vester.1 Thus, considering the

factor of “the defendant[s’] involvement or role in the murder[s],”

the absence of direct evidence that either defendant was the actual

killer compels my conclusion that the punishment of death is, in

this case, disproportionate. See Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137,
2

107 S. Ct. 1676, 95 L. Ed.2d 127 (1987)(discussing how a

defendant’s role in a murder affects the sentencing decision);

State v. Branam, 855 S.W.2d 563, 570-71 (Tenn. 1993). I would,

accordingly, remand the cause for a new sentencing hearing.

___________________________________

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., Justice
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Dan Hyer, Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-5-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the Government’s Unopposed Motion to Continue 

Defendant’s Sentencing Hearing (Doc. 283), and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Government’s Unopposed Motion to Continue 

Defendant’s Sentencing Hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the Sentencing from November 19, 2018,

to at ___________ .

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 283-1 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 1