alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 913 

Recognizing and commending the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association on the 40th anniversary of the establishment of the Office of 

Multicultural Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2009 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD (for himself and Mr. ROGERS of Michigan) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and commending the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association on the 40th anniversary of 

the establishment of the Office of Multicultural Affairs. 

Whereas the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 

(ASHA) represents over 135,000 Audiologists, SpeechLanguage Pathologists (SLPs), and Speech Language 

and Hearing Scientists in Health Care and Education; 

Whereas in 1969, the American Speech-Language-Hearing 

Association established the Office of Urban and Ethnic 

Affairs which later became the Office of Multicultural Affairs (OMA); 

Whereas the Office of Multicultural Affairs addresses cultural 

and linguistic diversity, issues related to professionals, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 913 IH 

students, and persons with communication disorders and 

differences; 

Whereas the Office of Multicultural Affairs has been instrumental in bringing attention to the health disparities associated with communication disorders, and addressing 

educational disproportionality across minority populations; 

Whereas the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 

became the first recipient of the Minority Health Leadership Award from the United States Department of 

Health and Human Services’ Office of Minority Health 

in 2006 for its work through the Office of Multicultural 

Affairs; and 

Whereas 2009 also marks the 10th anniversary of American 

Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s Minority Student 

Leadership Program, an ASHA effort to create a pipeline 

for talented Audiology and SLP graduate students from 

underrepresented groups into leadership positions within 

their professions: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the 135,000 members and staff 

3 of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Associa4 tion for advances made through the Office of Multi5 cultural Affairs; and 

6 (2) recognizes the Office of Multicultural Af7 fairs for their work on diversity and inclusion within 

8 the professions of Audiology and Speech-Language 

9 Pathology. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO     18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTHWEST CHARIOTS INCORPORATED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas Dewar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 2, 2007
|-------------------

By: /s/ Douglas DewarDouglas DewarChief Executive Officer, principal executive officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30071-30072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14999]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act, including whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C.      1843). Any request for a 
hearing must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal. Unless 
otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 8, 1996.

[[Page 30072]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. ABC Bancorp, Moultrie, Georgia; to merge with First National 
Financial Corporation, Albany, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire 
First National Bank of South Georgia, Albany, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 7, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-14999 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

Nos. 15-1475, 15-1569 and 15-1570

________________

MARK A. JACKSON

v.

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY; ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY;

ROHM AND HAAS CO BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE;

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; RAJ L. GUPTA; PIERRE

R. BRONDEAU; JACQUES M. CROISETTIERE; ROBERT A. LONERGAN, 

ESQUIRE; JANE GREENETZ; DEANNA MAY; CYNTHIA MAZER; RICHARD 

QUINLAN ESQUIRE; SEAN B. MCSWEENEY ESQUIRE; MICHAEL MILLER, 

ESQUIRE; NANCY MAYO; LORI HAMLIN; JOHN DOE NOS. 1-15

Mark A. Jackson, 

 Appellant in No. 15-1475 

Dow Chemical Company, Rohm and Haas Company,

Raj L. Gupta, Pierre R. Brondeau, Jacques M. Croisetiere,

Robert A. Lonergan, Ellen S. Friedell, Royce Warrick,

Jane Greenetz, Deanna May, Cynthia Mazer,

 Appellants in No. 15-1569

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Lori Hamlin, Nancy Mayo, 

Sean B. McSweeney, Richard P. Quinlan and Michael Miller,

 Appellants in No. 15-1570

________________

On Appeal from the District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 2-11-cv-06194)

District Judge: James Knoll Gardner

________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

January 14, 2016
Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

________________

JUDGMENT ORDER

________________

Essentially, for the reasons set forth in the District Court’s opinion, we will affirm 

the order of the District Court, denying in part and granting in part Defendants’ motions.

BY THE COURT,

s/Anthony J. Scirica

Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

DATED: April 25, 2016

CJG/cc: All Counsel of Record
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

ANNA R. WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS

Arizona State Bar No. 029708

Assistant U.S. Attorney

United States Courthouse

405 W. Congress Street, Suite 4800

Tucson, Arizona 85701

Telephone: 520-620-7300

Email: anna.wright@usdoj.gov

nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren,

 Defendant.

CR-18-00223-RCC (DTF)

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO 

INTERVENE FOR THE LIMITED 

PURPOSE OF CHALLENGING SEALING 

OF RECORDS

(Doc. 195)

The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby 

respectfully moves the Court for a 30-day extension of time to respond to Motion to 

Intervene by First Look Media for the Limited Purpose of Challenging Sealing of Records. 

Doc. 195. The United States’ response is due on May 13, 2019. In support of its motion, 

the United States offers the following:

1. Counsel for the United States are set to be in trial in United States v. Warren, 

17-mj-00341-RCC (JR), from May 6-8, 2019.

2. Counsel for the United States are scheduled for an evidentiary hearing in this 

case on May 13, 2019.

3. Counsel for the United States are set to begin trial in this case on May 28, 2019 

and is anticipated to last between two and three weeks.

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 199 Filed 05/03/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Counsel for the United States require additional time to research the unique legal 

issues presented by the Motion.

Counsel for First Look Media Works, Inc. were contacted regarding a 30-day

extension of the United States’ time to respond and object to an extension.

Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of May 2019.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

/s/ Anna R. Wright & Nathaniel J. Walters

ANNA WRIGHT &

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by other means this 3rd day of May 2019, to:

All ECF Participants

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 199 Filed 05/03/19 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

ORDER

Based on the United States’ Motion to Unseal for Limited Purpose, and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the United States’ request to unseal the 

transcript of the motion hearing held on May 3, 2021, and permitting the transcript to be 

released to the United States. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) is 

found to commence from __________ through __________.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1381-1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti
      William Uusiheimala, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Antti
                William UusiheimalaAntti
                William Uusiheimala
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              August
                12, 2008
#### Minshall et al., Board of Education of Union Twp. Rural School Dist., *v.*The State, ex rel. Merritt.

(No. 22871

Decided June 3, 1931.)

*62
      *Mr. Norman L.*McLean, prosecuting attorney, for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Troy T. Junk,*for defendant in error.

Matthias, J.

Section 7749-1, General Code, provides as follows: “The board of education of any district, except as provided in Section 7749, may provide transportation to a high school within or without the school district; but in no case shall such board of education be required to provide high school transportation except as follows: If the transportation of a child to a high school by a district of a county school district is deemed and declared by the county board of education advisable and practicable, the board of education of the district in which the child resides shall furnish such transportation.”

*63The county board of education is thus authorized to determine whether in a given situation transportation to a high school is advisable and practicable. If this finding is in the affirmative, then under this statute it becomes mandatory upon the board of education of the district in which the child resides to furnish such transportation.

In view of the provisions of Section 26 of Article II of the State Constitution, we need not inquire further as to the constitutional validity of the statute in question, for such enactment is there expressly sanctioned. It reads: “All laws, of a general nature, shall have a uniform operation throughout the State; nor, shall any act, except such as relates to public schools, be passed, to take effect upon the approval of any other authority than the General Assembly, except, as otherwise provided in this constitution.” Thus even if under its terms the effective operation of the statute in question be deemed subject to and dependent upon the approval of the designated authority, it, being a law which *1*‘ relates to public schools,” is expressly authorized by this provision of the Constitution, and cannot therefore be held impliedly in conflict with some other provision thereof.

The close similarity of the facts presented by the third defense brings it within the rule clearly announced in *State, ex rel. Masters,*v. *Beamer,*109 Ohio St., 133, 141 N. E., 851. That case is controlling and decisive of the question here presented.

On both grounds, therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Alien, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F OF GALILEO TECHNOLOGY
LTD. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          42,648
<SECURITIES>                                    63,005
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                       203
<INVENTORY>                                      8,094
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,319
<PP&E>                                          15,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,440
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,738
<SALES>                                         79,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,717
<CGS>                                           28,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,489
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,109
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2732-2733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1530]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2733]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 35

[Docket Nos. RM95-8-000 and RM94-7-001]


Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-
Discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of 
Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities

January 19, 1996.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of time for comments on Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 17, 1995, the staff of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission issued a draft environmental impact statement for 
the proposed rule in this proceeding (60 FR 58304, November 27, 1995). 
On January 3, 1996, an extension of time for the filing of comments on 
the DEIS was granted because certain departments and agencies of the 
Federal government were closed for all but emergency matters due to a 
lack of appropriated funds.

DATES: Comments by all parties shall be filed on or before February 2, 
1996.

ADDRESSES: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bill Meroney, Office of Economic Policy, (202) 208-1069.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1530 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RCN Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick T. Hogan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Patrick T.
Hogan

Patrick T. Hogan

March 30, 2004



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to RCN Corporation
and will be retained by RCN Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Shelby HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65664.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 4, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 9, 1994.

*654Shelby Harris, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the circuit court’s denial of his “Motion to Dispose of All Claims and for Final Disposition”. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29430-29431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14626]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 96-061]


NASA Advisory Council, Bion Task Force; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29431]]

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Bion Task Force.

DATES: July 1, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, 
300 E Street, SW., MIC 6 A & B, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Frank Sulzman, Code UL, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room and public comment will be allowed 
during designated discussion periods. The agenda for the meeting is:

--Welcome & Opening Remarks
--Charge to Committee
--Bion Overview
--Discussion
--Science Integrity Presentations
--Animal Welfare Presentations
--Sub-group Splinter Sessions
--Sub-group Reports
--Discussion

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be required to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: June 5, 1996.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-14626 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Xenacare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Rizzo, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | /s/ Frank Rizzo        
| | Frank Rizzo            
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date: August 16, 2010