alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2787-2788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1482]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Parts 611 and 655

[Docket No. 951208293-5293-01; I.D. 110995B]
RIN 0648-AF01


Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fisheries; Amendment 5; 
Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Correction to proposed regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to proposed regulation 
(I.D. 110995B), which was published Wednesday, December 20, 1995 (60 FR 
65618). The proposed regulation would implement Amendment 5 to the 
Fishery Management Plan for the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and 
Butterfish Fisheries (FMP).

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before 
January 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myles Raizin, Fishery Policy Analyst, 
508-281-9104.


[[Page 2788]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    As published in the proposed rule to implement Amendment 5 to the 
FMP, the portion of the ``Classification'' section containing response 
time for collection-of-information requirements inadvertently did not 
contain the estimated time it would take for vessel owners to address 
logbook requirements.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on December 20, 1995, of the proposed 
rule (I.D. 110995B) for Amendment 5, which was the subject of FR Doc. 
95-30821, is corrected as follows:
    On page 65621, under the Classification section, in the third 
column the first complete paragraph, the last sentence is corrected to 
read: ``The response times for these requirements is estimated to be: 
30 minutes per response for vessel permits and vessel permit appeals; 1 
hour per response for operator permits; 5 minutes per response for 
dealer permits; 5 minutes per response for vessel logbooks; and 2 
minutes per response for the observer notification requirement.''

    Dated: January 23, 1996.
Gary Matlock,
Program Management Officer, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-1482 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 1 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 2 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 3 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 4 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 5 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 6 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 7 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 8 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 9 of 10

Case 2:18-cv-00609-GMS   Document 1-1   Filed 02/23/18   Page 10 of 10
#### Charles O. ECHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50130.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 29, 1995.

Rosemary Percival, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Opinion issued February 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-01017-CR

———————————

MICHAEL HOSEA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 9415203

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Michael Hosea, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order

denying his motion requesting free copies of various documents and transcripts 

related to his felony conviction. We dismiss the appeal.
2

Hosea was convicted of murder in 1995. This Court previously affirmed the 

judgment of the trial court and dismissed two subsequent attempts to appeal from 

the trial court’s judgment. See Hosea v. State, No. 01-12-00918-CR, 2012 WL 

5878117 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication); Hosea v. State, No. 01-11-01050-CR, 2012 WL 

2345351 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication); Hosea v. State, No. 01-95-00358-CR, 1997 WL 

709453 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 6, 1997, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication).

On November 5, 2014, Hosea filed a “Motion to Obtain Trial Transcripts 

and Statement of Facts Informa [sic] Pauperis” in the trial court, seeking free 

copies of records from his criminal conviction for use in preparing an out-of-time 

appeal or an application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. The trial 

court denied the motion on November 12, 2014. Hosea filed a notice of appeal 

from the trial court’s order on December 8, 2014. 

“The denial of a motion to obtain a free record is not an appealable order.” 

Poole v. State, No. 14-14-00081-CR, 2014 WL 1268617, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 27, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication) (citing Manning v. State, No. 14-11-00464-CR, 2011 WL 2434064, at 

*1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 16, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not 
3

designated for publication)); see Quijano v. State, No. 14-11-01105-CR, 2012 WL 

214293, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 24, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., 

not designated for publication).

Accordingly, we dismiss Hosea’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark Brnovich

Attorney General

Michael E. Gottfried, No. 010623

Patrick J. Boyle, No. 031674

Assistant Attorney General

2005 N. Central Ave

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-1592

Telephone: (602) 542-7693

E-mail: michael.gottfried@azag.gov

 patrick.boyle@azag.gov

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela,

Plaintiff,

v.

Wayne Mooney, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV18-00555-PHX-DLR-MHB

STIPULATED MOTION TO 

CONTINUE EVIDENTIARY HEARING

Defendants, through undersigned counsel, move to continue the telephonic 

evidentiary hearing currently scheduled for July 19, 2019, under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) for approximately two weeks. Undersigned counsel was planning 

on representing Defendants at the hearing but unexpectedly has a medical issue that 

needs to be addressed at the same time. Assistant Attorney General Patrick Boyle is out 

of the office at the time of the hearing and was not planning to participate. Additionally, 

the parties are meeting the morning of July 17 in an attempt to resolve this and other 

matters. The undersigned represents that he has spoken with Plaintiff and that she has no 

objection to this request.

Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the telephonic hearing scheduled for 

July 19, 2019, be vacated and rescheduled approximately two weeks later, at the Court’s 

convenience.

Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 164 Filed 07/17/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 17th day of July, 2019.

MARK BRNOVICH

Attorney General

s/Michael E. Gottfried

Michael E. Gottfried

Assistant Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 17, 2019, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System. 

I further certify this document and the Notice of Electronic Filing were served by 

mail on the same date on the following, who is not a registered participant of the 

CM/ECF System:

Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela, ADC #172770

ASPC - Florence – Kasson Unit

P.O. Box 8200

Florence, AZ 85132

Plaintiff Pro Se

s/L. Fuentes

Secretary to Michael E. Gottfried

#8045085

Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 164 Filed 07/17/19 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTHWEST CHARIOTS INCORPORATED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Doolan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 28, 2007

By: */s/ Robert Doolan*

Robert Doolan

Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopper's Wallet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dejan Mirkovic, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
Company.


/s/ Dejan Mirkovic
----------------------------------------------
Dejan Mirkovic
Principal Financial Officer
May 4, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 829 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 829

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 15, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2892) making 
appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. The conference report shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the conference report to its adoption without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Sent Via Electronic
Mail

    


    February
___, 2009

    


    GenSpera,
Inc.

    9901 IH
10 West, Suite 800

    San
Antonio, TX, 78230

    Attn: 
Craig Dionne, CEO

                         

     Re: 
Amendment to 5%
Convertible Debenture

    


    Ladies
and Gentlemen:

    


    Reference
is made to that certain 5% Convertible Debenture  (the “Debenture”),
dated as of July, 2008, by and among GenSpera, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
T.R. Winston & Company, LLC.  This amendment (“Amendment”) shall
constitute an amendment to the Debenture.

    


    1.           The
Maturity Date shall be amended from July 14, 2009 to July 14, 2010.

    


    2.           All
terms defined in the Debenture and used in this Amendment shall have the same
meanings in this Amendment as in the Debenture.

    


    3.           Except
as amended by this Amendment, the Debenture shall remain in full force and
effect.

    


    This
amendment to the Debenture is entered into as of the date hereof.

    


    
      
        
          	 
      
	
                  By:  G.
      Tyler Runnels

                
	
                  Its:  President

                


        

      

    

    


    AGREED
TO:

    


    GENSPERA,
INC.

     

    
      
        
          
            	
                    By:

                  	 
      
	 
      	
                    Craig
      Dionne, CEO
Exhibit 11.0



Calculation of Earnings per Share

(share data in thousands, adjusted for August 24, 2001 four-for-three stock split)



|                                                     |  |              |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | -----
|                                                     |  | December 31,
|                                                     |  | 2003         |       | 2002 |   | 2001 
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                  |  |              | 3,016 |      |   | 3,007 |  |   | 2,990
|Common Stock Equivalents                             |  |              | 47    |      |   | 20    |  |   |     
|Average Common Shares and Equivalents, Fully Diluted |  |              | 3,063 |      |   | 3,027 |  |   | 2,990
|Net Income ($000)                                    |  | $            | 1,674 |      | $ | 1,227 |  | $ | 506  
|Basic Earnings per Share                             |  | $            | 0.56  |      | $ | 0.41  |  | $ | 0.17 
|Diluted Earnings per Share                           |  | $            | 0.55  |      | $ | 0.41  |  | $ | 0.17
**Exhibit
      10.6**




**FOURTH
      AMENDMENT**


**TO
      THE**


**PMA
      CAPITAL CORPORATION RETIREMENT SAVINGS EXCESS PLAN**


**(As
      Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2000)**









**WHEREAS** , **PMA
      Capital Corporation** (the
“Company”) maintains the **PMA
      Capital Corporation Retirement Savings Excess Plan** (the
“Plan”) for the purpose of providing certain eligible employees of the Company
      and certain of its participating affiliates with benefits that would be provided
      under the **PMA
      Capital Corporation Retirement Savings Plan** but for
      the limitations imposed by Sections 401(k), 401(m), 415 and 401(a)(17) of the
      Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); and




**WHEREAS** ,
      the
      Plan was most recently amended and restated effective January 1, 2000 and has
      since been modified by the First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2003,
      by
      the Second Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2004 and by the Third
      Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2006; and




**WHEREAS** ,
      the
      Company desires to clarify that Retirement Credits under the Plan are intended
      to be based on “compensation” that includes Employee Pre-Tax Credits to the
      Plan; and




**WHEREAS** ,
      under
      Sections 8.1(a) and 10.4 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to
      amend the Plan with respect to all Participating Companies at any time, subject
      to certain inapplicable limitations;




**NOW,
      THEREFORE** ,
      effective January 1, 2006, the Company hereby amends the Plan as
      follows:




I. Section
      4.6 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“4.6  Retirement
      Credits .
      For
      each calendar quarter for which a Participant is entitled to a Retirement
      Contribution under the Qualified Plan, the Plan Sponsor shall credit each
      Participant’s Excess Retirement Savings Plan Account with Retirement Credits in
      an amount equal to:




(a)  The
      amount of Retirement Contributions that would have been made for the calendar
      quarter on behalf of the Participant, but for the limitations of Sections
      401(a)(17) and 415 of the Code and deeming “compensation” to include Employee
      Pre-Tax Credits to this Plan; minus




(b)  The
      amount of Retirement Contributions actually made to the Qualified Plan on behalf
      of the Participant for the calendar quarter.







**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, PMA CAPITAL CORPORATION** has
      caused these presents to be duly executed, under seal, this 20 day of December,
      2006.














Attest:
            
            **PMA
                CAPITAL CORPORATION****[SEAL]**/s/
                Andrew J. McGillAndrew
                J. McGillVice
                President, Human Resources





2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15357]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-120-015]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 12, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 7, 1996, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective June 
1, 1996:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 4000

    Koch states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's electronic filing requirements and revise a previously 
filed sheet to reflect compliance with Order No. 582.
    Koch states that copies of the filing will be served upon all 
parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in this 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15357 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Executive Officer February 14, 2011
Exhibit 10.8(a)  


 FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE SKYWEST, INC.

2006 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN  


        This First Amendment to the SkyWest, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
"Plan") is adopted effective as of January 1, 2009 by SkyWest, Inc., a Utah corporation (the
"Company") as sponsor of the Plan. 


        WHEREAS,
the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible employees and the eligible employees of its designated subsidiaries; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan to change the definition of "Purchase Price." 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 


        1.     The
text of Section 2(v) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following: 




"'Purchase Price' means with respect to any Offering Period commencing after December 31, 2008 an amount equal to 95% of the Fair Market Value
(as defined in Section 7(b) below) of a Share on the Purchase Date." 





        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed this    day of January, 2009. 



				
	 	SKYWEST, INC.
	
 	
 By:	
 	
/s/ BRADFORD R. RICH  
	 	 	 	






  
	 	Name:	 	Bradford R. Rich
	 	 	 	





  
	 	Its:	 	Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31945-31946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15821]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a list of information collection 
requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call 
the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301)443-0525.
    Evaluation of the Comprehensive Mental Health Services Program for 
Children--Revision of a currently approved collection--The 
Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services Program for Children 
with Serious Emotional Disturbances supports the development of more 
accessible and appropriate services for children and adolescents with 
serious, emotional, behavioral, or mental disorders in 22 sites. An 
evaluation will be conducted for a five year period in the 22 program 
sites and four comparison sites. The study will collect outcome data 
from children and families and process data from service providers. The 
estimated average annual burden is 26,604 hours.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Responses per     Hours per      Total hour  
                      Number of respondents                         respondent       response         burden    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29,848..........................................................           2.829            .315          26,604
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: 
Virginia Huth, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management

[[Page 31946]]

and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10236, Washington, DC 
20503.

    Dated: June 17, 1996.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 96-15821 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
```