31148 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Notices

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337–TA–380]

Certain Agricultural Tractors Under 50

Power Take-Off Horsepower; Notice of

Commission Determination Not To

Review an Initial Determination Finding

Three Respondents To Be in Default

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission had determined not to

review the initial determination (ID) of

the presiding administrative law judge

(ALJ) in the above-captioned

investigation finding respondents

Tractor Company, Sonica Trading, Inc.

(Sonica Trading), and Toyo Service Co.,

Ltd. (Toyo Service) in default, and to

have waived their respective rights to

appear, to be served with documents,

and to contest the allegations at issue in

the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shara L. Aranoff, Esq., Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. International

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone 202–

205–3090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Neither

Tractor Company, Sonica Trading, nor

Toyo Service filed a response to the

notice of investigation or the complaint,

a discovery statement, a target date

statement, or responses to complainants’

discovery requests. On April 8, 1996,

complainants Kubota Tractor

Corporation, Kubota Manufacturing of

America Corporation, and Kubota

Corporation moved that Tractor

Company, Sonica Trading, and Toyo

Service be ordered to show cause why

they should not be found in default, and

if they failed to make such a showing,

that an ID be issued finding them to be

in default. On April 17, 1996, the ALJ

ordered the subject respondents to show

cause no later than May 3, 1996, why

each should not be found in default

(Order No. 8). None of the three

respondents filed a response to the

order. Accordingly, on May 8, 1996, the

ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 13) finding

Tractor Company, Sonica Trading, and

Toyo Service in default pursuant to

Commission final rule 210.16, and

ruling that they had waived their

respective rights to appear, to be served

with documents, and to contest the

allegations at issue in the investigation.

No petitions for review of the ID were

received.

This action is taken under the

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337),

and section 210.42 of the Commission’s

final Rules of Practice and Procedure

(19 CFR § 210.42).

Copies of the ID and all other

nonconfidential documents filed in

connection with this investigation are

available for inspection during official

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436,

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing

impaired persons are advised that

information on the matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal at 202–

205–1810.

Issued: June 10, 1996.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–15610 Filed 6–18–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

[Inv. No. 337–TA–388]

Certain Dynamic Random Access

Memory Controllers and Certain MultiLayer Integrated Circuits, as well as

Chipsets and Products Containing

Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on May

13, 1996, under section 337 of the Tariff

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.

§ 1337, on behalf of Intel Corporation,

2200 Mission College Boulevard, Santa

Clara, California 95052- 8119. The

complaint was amended on May 24,

1996, and June 4, 1996, and

supplemented on May 28, 1996. The

complaint, as amended and

supplemented, alleges violations of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain dynamic

random access memory controllers and

certain multi-layer integrated circuits, as

well as chipsets and products

containing same, that infringe claims 1,

2, 5, 7, and 15 of United States Letters

Patent 5,307,320, and claims 1 and 11

of United States Letters Patent

4,775,550.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after a hearing, issue a permanent

exclusion order and permanent cease

and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for

any confidential information contained

therein, is available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Room

112, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

202–205–1802. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Smith R. Brittingham IV, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission,

telephone 202–205–2576.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10.

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

June 12, 1996, ORDERED THAT—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain dynamic random

access memory controllers and certain

multi-layer integrated circuits, as well

as chipsets and products containing

same, by reason of infringement of

claims 1, 2, 5, 7, or 15 of United States

Letters Patent 5,307,320, or claims 1 or

11 of United States Letters Patent

4,775,550; and whether there exists an

industry in the United States as required

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—Intel

Corporation, 2200 Mission College

Boulevard, Santa Clara, California

95052–8119.

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

United Microelectronics Corporation,

No. 13 Innovation Road I, ScienceBased Industrial Park, Hsinchu,

Taiwan

Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation,

2F No. 17 Innovation Rd. I, ScienceBased Industrial Park, Hsinchu,

Taiwan
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Notices 31149

Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation

(U.S.), 240 North Wolfe Road,

Sunnyvale, California 94806

Integrated Technology Express, 2388

Walsh Avenue, Santa Clara, California

95051

(c) Smith R. Brittingham IV, Esq.,

Office of Unfair Import Investigations,

U.S. International Trade Commission,

500 E Street, S.W., Room 401–M,

Washington, D.C. 20436, shall be the

Commission investigative attorney,

party to this investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Sidney Harris is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

sections 201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s Rules, 19 CFR 201.16(d)

and 210.13(a), such responses will be

considered by the Commission if

received not later than 20 days after the

date of service by the Commission of the

complaint and the notice of

investigation. Extensions of time for

submitting responses to the complaint

will not be granted unless good cause

therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against such

respondent.

Issued: June 12, 1996.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–15608 Filed 6–18–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

[Investigation No. 337–TA–382]

Certain Flash Memory Circuits and

Products Containing Same; Notice of

Change of Commission Investigative

Attorney

Notice is hereby given that, as of this

date, Juan S. Cockburn, Esq. of the

Office of Unfair Import Investigations is

designated as the Commission

investigative attorney in the above-cited

investigation instead of John M.

Whealan, Esq.

Dated: June 10, 1996.

Lynn I. Levine,

Director, Office of Unfair Import

Investigations, 500 E Street, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20436.

[FR Doc. 96–15605 Filed 6–18–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

[Investigation No. 337–TA–383]

Certain Hardware Logic Emulation

Systems and Components Thereof;

Notice of Commission Determination

not to Review an Initial Determination

Granting the Motion of Bull HN

Information Systems, Inc. To Intervene

in the Permanent Relief Phase of the

Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission has determined not to

review the presiding administrative law

judge’s (ALJ’s) initial determination (ID)

in the above-captioned investigation

granting the motion of Bull HN

Information Systems, Inc. to intervene

in the permanent relief phase of the

investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim

Yaworski, Esq., Office of the General

Counsel, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone 202–

205–3096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

January 26, 1996, Quickturn Design

Systems, Inc. of Mountain View,

California filed a complaint with the

Commission alleging a violation of

section 337 of Tariff Act of 1930 in the

importation, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain hardware

logic emulation systems and

components thereof by reason of

infringement of certain U.S. patents

owned by Quickturn. Quickturn also

filed a motion for temporary relief on

the same date.

The Commission instituted an

investigation of Quickturn’s complaint,

provisionally accepted its motion for

temporary relief, and published a notice

of investigation in the Federal Register

on March 8, 1996. 61 Fed. Reg. 9486.

The notice named Mentor Graphics

Corp. of Wilsonville, Oregon and Meta

Systems of Saclay, France as

respondents.

On May 1, 1996, Bull HN Information

Systems, Inc. of Billerica, Massachusetts

moved to intervene in the permanent

relief phase of the investigation. The

motion was opposed by Quickturn and

supported by Mentor and Meta. The

Commission investigative attorney did

not oppose the motion.

On May 14, 1996 the presiding ALJ

issued an ID (Order No. 30) granting

Bull’s motion to intervene. Quickturn

filed a petition for review of the ID, and

Mentor, Meta, and Bull filed

oppositions to the petition.

This action is taken pursuant to

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and

Commission rule 210.42 (19 C.F.R.

§ 210.42).

Copies of the ALJ’s ID and all other

nonconfidential documents filed in

connection with this investigation are or

will be available for inspection during

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436,

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that

information about this matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal, 202–205–

1810.

Issued: June 12, 1996.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–15607 Filed 6–18–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Prison Industries, Inc.

Planning, Research and Activation

Branch; Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request

ACTION: Notice of Information Collection

under Review; Public Involvement

Procedures Regarding Proposals to

Produce New Products or Expand the

Production of Existing Products.

The proposed information collection

is published to obtain comments from

the public. Emergency review of this

collection has been requested from OMB

by June 14, 1996. This approval is only

valid for 90 days. Regular review of this

proposed collection is also being

undertaken at this time. Comments are

encouraged and will be accepted for 60

days from the date listed at the top of

this page in the Federal Register.