alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14962]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IN59-1-7217b; FRL-5510-8]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 29, 1995, the State of Indiana submitted a State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request to the EPA for rule changes 
specific to Allison Engine Company (Allison) plants 5 and 8 located in 
Marion County, Indiana. The EPA proposes to approve Indiana's request. 
In the final rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is 
approving this action as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because the EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates 
no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth 
in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in 
response to that direct final rule, no further activity is contemplated 
in relation to this proposed rule. If the EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period 
on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this notice 
should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before 
July 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the State submittal and the EPA's analysis of it are 
available for inspection at: Regulation Development Section, Air 
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Pohlman, Regulation Development 
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 
(312) 886-3299.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: May 15, 1996.

Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-14962 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the periodic report of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph A. Jolson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph A. Jolson   
|                       |  |  |  | Joseph A. Jolson       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies
this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
AFC Enterprises, Inc:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-56444, 333-81404, 333-90706, and 333-98867) on Form S-8 of AFC
Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated December 15, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of AFC Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 29, 2002 and December 30, 2001, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 29, 2002, and all related
financial statement schedules, which report appears in the December 29, 2002,
annual report on Form 10-K of AFC Enterprises, Inc.

As discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements,
effective December 31, 2001, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."

As discussed in Note 23 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements,
the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 30, 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity,
and cash flows for the years ended December 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000,
which were audited by other independent auditors who have ceased operations,
have been restated.

                                        /s/ KPMG, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
December 15, 2003
|   | (i)    |   | the                accompanying Annual Report on                Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                as amended; and |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | (ii)   |   | the                information contained in the                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and results of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                               |

|     |  |                                                             |  |  |
|-----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
| By: |  | /s/                Alfred C. Liggins, III                   |  |  |
|     |  |                                                             |  |  |
|     |  | Name:                Alfred C. Liggins, III                 |  |  |
|     |  | Title:                President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of RiT Technologies Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Doron Zinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2006

|/s/ Doron Zinger
Doron ZingerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00398-CV

Eric Anderson, Appellant

v.

Matthew Sturdivant, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. C-1-CV-18-012072, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 9, 

2019. On December 10, 2019, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to 

his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit 

a status report regarding this appeal by December 20, 2019. Further, the notice advised appellant 

that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of 

prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this 

Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to 

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court 

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established 
2

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because 

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana 

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: February 19, 2020
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CX2 Technologies.,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Raimundo Dias , Chief Executive Officer, President, and Principal
Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge :

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of
and for the period covered by the Report.

Date: February 15, 2010

| | /s/
      Raimundo Dias                                           
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Raimundo Dias, Chief Executive Officer,
      President, Principal
| | Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer                       

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15393]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Notice of Meetings

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
following meetings of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II in July.
    A summary of the meetings may be obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, 
Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA Office of Extramural Activities 
Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, Rockville, Maryland 20857. 
Telephone: (301) 443-4783.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the individual 
named as Contact for the meetings listed below.
    The meetings will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual contract proposals. These discussions could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals and 
confidential and financial information about an individual's proposal. 
The discussion may also reveal information about procurement activities 
exempt from disclosure by statute and trade secrets and commercial or 
financial information obtained from a person and privileged and 
confidential. Accordingly, the meetings are concerned with matters 
exempt from mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (3),(4), and 
(6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 10(d).
    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II.
    Meeting Date: July 9-10, 1996.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, Randolph Conference Room, 1750 Rockville 
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Closed: July 9, 1996, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; July 10, 1996, 8:30 
a.m.-adjournment.
    Contact: Ferdinand W. Hui, Ph.D., Room 17-89, Parklawn Building, 
Telephone: (301) 443-9912 and FAX: (301) 443-3437.

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II.
    Meeting Date: July 15, 1996.
    Place: Residence Inn, Gatehouse Conference Room. 7335 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
    Closed: July 15, 1996, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Contact: Ferdinand W. Hui, Ph.D., Room 17-89, Parklawn Building, 
Telephone: (301) 443-9912 and FAX: (301) 443-3437.

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II.
    Meeting Date: July 24-26, 1996.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, Palladium Room, 5520 Wisconsin, 
Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.
    Closed: July 24-25, 1996, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; July 26, 1996, 8:30 
a.m. to adjournment.
    Contact: Constance M. Burtoff, M.A., Room 17-89, Parklawn Building, 
Telephone: (301) 443-2437 and FAX: (301) 443-3437.

    Dated: June 12, 1996.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 96-15393 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 881 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 881

    Recognizing the citizens of Wills Point for commemorating 100th 
    anniversary of President William Taft's 1909 campaign stop and 
    preserving the city's history for future generations of Texans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Hensarling submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the citizens of Wills Point for commemorating 100th 
    anniversary of President William Taft's 1909 campaign stop and 
    preserving the city's history for future generations of Texans.

Whereas Wills Point, Texas, located in historic Van Zandt County, whose village 
        proper was formed by and named for William Wills;
Whereas the Texas and Pacific Railroad, upon completion in 1873, attracted 
        businesses from nearby communities to relocate to Wills Point;
Whereas Wills Point became the first Van Zandt County community to incorporate 
        in 1884, making 2009 the 125th anniversary of its incorporation;
Whereas 100 years ago, President William H. Taft traveled by train across East 
        Texas and made a whistle stop in Wills Point; and
Whereas the City of Wills Point will hold a special re-enactment and celebration 
        of the 100th anniversary of President Taft's 1909 visit on October 31, 
        2009: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the citizens of Wills Point for 
        commemorating 100th anniversary of President William Taft's 
        1909 campaign stop and preserving the city's history for future 
        generations of Texans;
            (2) acknowledges the tireless work and dedication of Mayor 
        Scott McGriff and City Manager Jim Stephens for making this 
        celebration a success; and
            (3) recognizes Wills Point city council members, officials, 
        and historians who have worked to support this memorable 
        occasion.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kelly Henry SAWYER, Relator, v. The Honorable Richard MILLARD, Judge, Respondent.

No. D-3322.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 24, 1993.

John Gano, Houston, for relator.

John P. Scott, Houston, Stephen R. Lewis, Jr., George W. Vie, III, Matt McCracken, Galveston, Richard Millard, Craig Smyser, Houston, J. Kevin Oncken, Austin, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

After Kelly Sawyer failed timely to designate expert witnesses under an order granting a motion to compel responses to interrogatories, the trial court precluded Sawyer from calling or designating any experts. Sawyer subsequently took a voluntary nonsuit.

When Sawyer filed the present action alleging substantially the same claims, the defendants filed a motion to enforce the sanction from the previous suit. On October 19, 1992, the trial court granted the motion, with the effect of precluding Sawyer from designating or calling expert witnesses. For the reasons set forth today in *Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Specia,*849 S.W.2d 805 (Tex.1993, orig. proceeding), we hold that the sanction of striking witnesses did not survive the nonsuit.

Without hearing oral argument, a majority of this court conditionally grants the petition for mandamus. Tex.R.App.P. 170. The writ will issue only if the trial judge refuses to vacate his order of October 19, 1992.
Assumption and Indemnity Agreement




 Exhibit 10.19 
 ASSUMPTION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT 
 This Assumption and Indemnity Agreement made as of
December 18, 1992 by and between Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. (“IPL”) and Interprovincial Pipe Line System Inc., formerly 159569 Canada Ltd., (“System”), both corporations duly incorporated under the Canada Business
Corporations Act; 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, IPL, Lakehead Pipe Line Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Lakehead Pipe Line Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), are parties to a
Distribution Support Agreement, dated as of December 27, 1991 (the “Support Agreement”), pursuant to Section 2.6(a) of which IPL agreed to cause the Company to comply on a timely basis with its obligations under Article II of the
Support Agreement, including the Company’s obligation to purchase APIs (as defined in the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership) if necessary; and 
 WHEREAS, in accordance with the Plan of Arrangement (the “Plan of Arrangement”) made pursuant to Section 192 of the Canada Business
Corporations Act involving IPL, its shareholders and System, which Plan of Arrangement was approved by IPL’s Board of Directors on March 11, 1992, IPL’s shareholders on May 6, 1992, and the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
on December 9, 1992, whereby IPL transferred ownership of all of its assets other than the Canadian Main Line System and the outstanding capital stock of the Company to System; and 
 WHEREAS, System and IPL desire that System assume the obligations of IPL under the Support Agreement; 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	With the consent of IPL, System hereby assumes all of the duties, obligations and liabilities of IPL under Section 2.6(a) of the Support Agreement and agrees to perform and
discharge the same in accordance with all of the terms and conditions of the Support Agreement. 

  

	2.	 System hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless IPL from and against any loss, claim, damage or liability, or any action in respect thereof, to which IPL may
become subject, insofar as such loss, claim, damage, liability or action arises out of, or is based upon, the breach or nonperformance by System of any of its duties, obligations or liabilities hereunder, and shall reimburse IPL promptly upon demand
for any legal or 












	 	 
other expenses reasonably incurred by IPL in connection with investigating or defending or preparing to defend against any such loss, claim, damage,
liability or action as such expenses are incurred. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assumption and
Indemnity Agreement as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	INTERPROVINCIAL PIPE LINE INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ D. P. Truswell
		
	By:	 	/s/ D. B. MacDermott
		 	Donald B. MacDermott
		 	[ILLEGIBLE]
	
	INTERPROVINCIAL PIPE LINE SYSTEM INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ D. B. MacDermott
		 	President
		
	By:	 	/s/ B. G. Melnyk
		 	


  

 - 2 -
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7815

ANTHONY HOLLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DON R. GUILLORY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-95-694)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Holley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance

with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied,

454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when

Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of

discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED