alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ZION GROVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellant, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, Missouri, Defendant.

No. WD 51044.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 19, 1996.

*661M. Corinne Corley, Corley Law Firm, Kansas City, for appellant.

Kathleen A. Hauser, City Attorney, Sharon K Euler, Asst. City Attorney, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Zion Grove Missionary Baptist Church appeals the summary judgment against its petition collaterally attacking taxes assessed against its property.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.
#### Bryant CARRUTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67773.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 17, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 20,1995.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 924 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 924

    Directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives copies of any document, record, memo, correspondence, 
or other communication of the Department of Defense, or any portion of 
such communication, that refers or relates to the trial or detention of 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarek Bin 'Attash, Ramzi 
   Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2009

 Mr. McKeon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives copies of any document, record, memo, correspondence, 
or other communication of the Department of Defense, or any portion of 
such communication, that refers or relates to the trial or detention of 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarek Bin 'Attash, Ramzi 
   Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs the Secretary 
of Defense to transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 
14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, copies of 
any document, record, memo, correspondence, or other communication of 
the Department of Defense, or any portion of such communication, that 
refers or relates to the trial or detention of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, 
Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarek Bin 'Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul 
Aziz Ali, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the Government’s Motion to Confirm Trial Subpoenas, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion to Confirm Trial Subpoenas.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all trial subpoenas issued for the previous trial 

dates in this case shall remain in effect for the current trial date of January 12, 2021.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1042-1 Filed 07/14/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32





DUSSAULT APPAREL INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dussault Apparel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Natalie Bannister, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 25, 2013
By:
/s/Natalie BannisterName:
Natalie BannisterTitle:
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 13a-14(a)

|I, Kent M. Harvey, certify that:
|--------------------------------
|                                
|1.                              
|                                
|2.                              
|                                
|3.                              
|                                
|4.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|5.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|Date: March 4, 2005             
|                                
|                                
|/s/ Kent M. Harvey              
|                                
|Kent M. Harvey                  
|Chairman and President          
|PG&E Funding LLC                



Exhibit 31.2



PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 13a-14(a)

|I, Nicholas Bijur, certify that:
|--------------------------------
|                                
|1.                              
|                                
|2.                              
|                                
|3.                              
|                                
|4.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|5.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                



|Date:  March 4, 2005
|--------------------
|                    
|                    
|/s/ Nicholas Bijur  
|                    
|Nicholas Bijur      
|Treasurer           
|PG&E Funding LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Faraud K. Muhammad, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

The Governor to the CIA of Illinois et al. ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

JUN - 5 2009 

Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

09 1046 

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted seven complaints each accompanied by an 

application to proceed in forma pauperis. In each complaint, plaintiff sues "secret CIA" agents 

and in five complaints he adds "[t]he Governor to the CIA of Illinois" and officers of the 

DeKalb, Illinois, police department. Because the Court will dispose of the seven complaints in 

the same manner, it will consolidate them into one civil action, grant plaintiff s in forma 

pauperis application and dismiss the case as frivolous. I 

Plaintiff is a homeless individual in the District of Columbia. He accuses the defendants 

of various misdeeds, including poisoning him with toxic material and transferring "certain [of 

his] brainwave frequencies" to CIA headquarters and the basement of the DeKalb police 

department to monitor his activities. Complaints that describe fantastic or delusional scenarios 

are subject to immediate dismissal. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989); Best v. 

I In proceedings where leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the Court must 

"dismiss the case at any time [it] determines that ... the action ... is frivolous." 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915( e )(2)(B)(i). In addition to "The Governor to the CIA of Illinois" and the DeKalb police 

department, the named defendants, as consolidated, are: "Secret CIA Agents" Mariah, Star, Al 

Ousli, Tim Bowden, Stephanie Knudson, John Muhammad, Elois D. Harris, Medinah Harris, 

Mecca Muhammad, Naoki Harris, Nadar Muhammad, Vekie Harris, B Littlejohn, Sharon 

Littlejohn, Tina Harris, Tiffany Harris and Ericka Littlejohn and Police Officers Melissa 

Hernandez, Tim Moore and Lt. Dan Gerace. 
Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). Moreover, a complaint may be dismissed as 

frivolous when it lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact." Brandon v. District of Columbia Bd. 

of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Because each consolidated complaint qualifies for 

such treatment, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order issued contemporaneously. 

Date: May ~, 2009 

- 2 -
Exhibit 32.1

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the periodic report of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph A. Jolson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 4, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph A. Jolson   
|                       |  |  |  | Joseph A. Jolson       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Inconnection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of RCN Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,respectively (the “Report”), Peter D. Aquino, as President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company./s/ PETER D. AQUINO
#### 7TH DAY ADVENTIST SCHOOL, Appellant, v. Gilbert and Dolly ESCAMILLA, Individually, and as Next Friends of Sandra Escamilla, A Minor, Appellees.

No. 13-88-032-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

Nov. 3, 1988.

Richard D. Schell, Wiley & Fleuriet, Har-lingen, for appellant.

Ray R. Marchan, Law Offices of Warren L. Eddington, Brownsville, for appellees.

Before NYE, C.J., and BENAVIDES and DORSEY, JJ.

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

Appellant, 7th Day Adventist School, brings this appeal by writ of error. The trial court granted a default judgment in favor of appellees in a personal injury action.

In its only point of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in granting a default judgment because the service of citation did not comply with Tex.R.Civ.P. 103 and 106. Citation was served on appellant by a court-ordered private process server. Appellant, citing *Garcia v. Gutierrez,*697 S.W.2d 758 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1985, no writ), argues that such service was improper.

Appellees confess error; however, they argue that the costs of appeal should be “borne by appellant” since the appellees *offered*to enter into an agreed order setting aside the judgment prior to the expiration of time to commence appeal procedures.

Tex.R.App.P. 89 provides in pertinent part that:

> In any civil cause reversed by the court of appeals, the appellant shall be entitled to an execution in the trial court against the appellee for costs occasioned by such appeal, including costs for the transcript and statement of facts. Nothing herein shall be construed to ... limit or impair the power of the court of appeals to otherwise tax the costs for good cause.

Since appellees confessed error, the cause must be reversed and remanded. The appellant, therefore, is entitled to have the costs assessed against appellees unless we find that good cause exists to do otherwise. Appellant contends that the costs should not be assessed against it since it had already incurred the costs of appeal before appellees offered to set the judgment aside. We agree.

The only evidence in the record concerning appellees “offer” to set aside the judgment is a letter written by their counsel addressed to counsel for appellant. The letter was dated February 23, 1988 and was filed in this Court on February 25, 1988. The record reflects that, prior to the date the letter was received and filed with this Court, the transcript, statement of facts, and brief had already been filed by appellant.

*786Since the appellees’ offer to set aside the default judgment occurred after appellant had already incurred costs of appeal, we find no good cause to tax costs of this appeal against appellant. Accordingly, we order the costs be assessed against the appellees. The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sally Holdings LLC and SallyCapital Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Rea, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of each of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Companies.
|                 | By:    | /s/ DAVID L. REA                                 |   |
|-----------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|            |   | David L. Rea                                     |
|            |   | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial       |
|            |   | Officer of Sally  Holdings LLC and Sally Capital |
|            |   | Inc.                                             |
|            |   |                                             |
| August 29, 2007 |   |                                             |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13854]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Public Meeting

    The National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board will 
hold a public meeting on Tuesday, June 25, 1996 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 
p.m., at the Holiday Inn, 1210 North 43rd Street, Grand Forks, ND 
58203.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss such matters as may be 
presented by Advisory Board members, staff of the SBA, or other 
present.
    For further information, write or call Mary Ann Holl, SBA, 4th 
Floor, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-7302.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Michael P. Novelli,
Director, Office of Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 96-13854 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 12.3**CERTIFICATION**I, Xu JieBo, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Southern Airlines CompanyLimited;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;and(d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date:June 30, 2006 By: /s/ Xu Jie Bo         Name: Xu Jie Bo    Title: Chief Financial Officer