alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tony HONKINS, a/k/a Yule Hobson, Appellant. Tony HONKINS, a/k/a Yule Hobson, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66822.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 30, 1996.

Raymund J. Capelvotich, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellate.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tony Honkins (“defendant”), appeals from the judgment of conviction for tampering in the first degree, RSMo § 569.080.1(2) (1986), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a trial by jury.1 We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. *State v. Gaines,*807 S.W.2d 678 n. 1 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).

1

. Defendant did not brief any issues with respect to the denial, of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing; accordingly, appeal from that judgment is deemed abandoned.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 814 

Honoring the life and service of Dewey Lee Fletcher, Jr. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. FLEMING (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. CAO, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. MELANCON, and Mr. SCALISE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and service of Dewey Lee Fletcher, Jr. 

Whereas the United States honors Lee Fletcher as a public 

servant, mentor, and friend to many; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher was born in Oak Grove, Louisiana, on 

April 29, 1966, and reared on a horse ranch and cotton 

farm by his grandparents Dayton C. Brown and Pat 

Brown; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher served as Student Body President at 

Louisiana Tech University and graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Education in 1989; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher received a Master of Business Administration degree from Louisiana State University in 

Baton Rouge in 2000; 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 814 IH 

Whereas Lee Fletcher served as an aide in the Administration of President George H. W. Bush, District Director 

to Congressman Jim McCrery, Chief of Staff to Congressman John Cooksey, and Chief of Staff to Congressman John Fleming; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher has been recognized as one of the 

greatest political minds in Louisiana, instrumental in 

electing candidates to local, State, and Federal office; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher, through his life, deeds, and service to 

others, has been, and will continue to be, an inspiration 

to many, and has touched the lives of all whom he met; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher was a man of strength, resilience, and 

perseverance who overcame the greatest of adversity to 

succeed; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher bravely fought cancer, finally succumbing on September 30, 2009, in his home State of 

Louisiana while watching his beloved Louisiana Tech 

Bulldogs defeat the University of Hawaii; 

Whereas Lee Fletcher will be forever remembered for his 

service to others, commitment to his ideals, love of family, friends, community, State, and Nation, and for the 

joy and laughter he brought to all those who knew him; 

and 

Whereas his legacy will live on in the lives of those he 

touched: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the life of Dewey Lee Fletcher, Jr. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### William Robert OLIVER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 0991-94.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Jan. 25, 1995.

*652Kenneth W. Smith (Court-appointed, on appeal), Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Ernest Davila, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

*OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

MANSFIELD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of possession of methamphetamine less than 28 grams. The trial court found the enhancement allegations to be true and assessed punishment at confinement for ten years. The conviction was originally affirmed by the Court of Appeals. *Oliver v. State,*813 S.W.2d 762 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st], 1991) We reversed that decision and remanded for reconsideration in light of *Green v. State,*872 S.W.2d 717 (Tex.Cr.App.1994). The Court of Appeals again affirmed. *Oliver v. State,*881 S.W.2d 87 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1994). Appellant once again brings a petition for discretionary review. We will again grant the petition and, once again, remand to the Court of Appeals.

In his sole ground for review Appellant complains that he was not given the opportunity to rebrief and present arguments to the Court of Appeals. He states that no notice was sent informing him of such right and no enquiry was made by the Court of Appeals as to why no such brief had been filed. Tex. R.App.Pro. 74(Z)(2). The record supports Appellant’s contention.

This Court has held that the return of the record to the appellate court is equivalent to the filing of the transcript and statement of facts, giving counsel thirty days in which to file a brief in Appellant’s behalf. *Theus v. State,*863 S.W.2d 489 (Tex.Cr.App.1993). When no brief is timely filed a court of appeals must make enquiries as to why such omission has occurred. Tex.R.App.Pro. 74(Z )(2).

Therefore, Appellant’s ground for review is summarily granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded once again to that court in order that Appellant may file a brief after remand.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ James B. Wiegand
 James B. Wiegand
 Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 July 13, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants.

Case No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO LATE FILE 

REPLY ON CROSS-MOTION FOR 

DISCOVERY IN RESPONSE TO UNITED 

STATES’ MOTION TO RESOLVE 

PRIVILEGE ISSUES (First Request)

Having considered Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Late File Reply on CrossMotion for Discovery in Response to United States’ Motion to Resolve Privilege Issues 

(First Request), and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.

DATED this day of , 20 .

 

HON. BRIDGET S. BADE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 295-2 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6457

SAVINO BRAXTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-97-3719-JFM)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Braxton v. Maryland, No. CA-97-3719-JFM (D.

Md. Mar. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

h0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146159 & (21)(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146159

COA: 309508

Wayne CC: 06

- 014443

- FC

CAROL ANN POOLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion for appointment of counsel and motion to remand are DENIED.
H. Res. 739 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 30, 2009. 

Whereas the United States honors Norman E. Borlaug as an 

Iowan, humanitarian, and father of the ‘‘Green Revolution’’; 

Whereas Dr. Borlaug was born on March 25, 1914, and grew 

up on a family farm outside Cresco, Iowa; 

Whereas Dr. Borlaug attended the University of Minnesota, 

where he received B.A. and Ph.D. degrees and was also 

a star NCAA wrestler; 

Whereas, for over 20 years, Dr. Borlaug was a member of 

the faculty of Texas A&M University; 

Whereas Dr. Borlaug spent 20 years working in the poorest 

areas of rural Mexico where he made his breakthrough 

achievement in developing a strain of wheat that could 

exponentially increase yields while actively resisting disease; 

Whereas Dr. Borlaug’s ‘‘green revolution’’ uplifted hundreds 

of thousands of the rural poor in Mexico and saved hundreds of millions from famine and outright starvation in 

India and Pakistan; 

Whereas Dr. Borlaug’s approach to wheat production next 

spread throughout the Middle East, and soon his approach was adapted to rice growing, increasing the num-
2 

•HRES 739 EH 

ber of lives Dr. Borlaug has been credited to saving to 

more than a billion people; 

Whereas in 1970, Dr. Borlaug received the Nobel Peace 

Prize, the only person working in agriculture to ever be 

so honored, and since then he has received numerous 

honors and awards, including the Presidential Medal of 

Freedom, the Public Service Medal, the National Academy of Sciences’ highest honor, the Rotary International 

Award for World Understanding and Peace, and the Congressional Gold Medal; 

Whereas, up until his death on September 12, 2009, Dr. 

Borlaug continued to work to alleviate poverty and malnutrition throughout the world; 

Whereas Dr. Borlaug created the World Food Prize in 1986, 

which is the ‘‘Nobel Prize for Food and Agriculture’’ and 

which has honored Laureates from Bangladesh, India, 

China, Mexico, Denmark, Sierra Leone, Switzerland, the 

United Kingdom, and the United States; 

Whereas the headquarters of the World Food Prize is located 

in Des Moines, Iowa; and 

Whereas Dr. Borlaug’s humanitarian works have made him 

an American hero who will never be forgotten: Now, 

therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 739 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

life and achievements of Dr. Norman E. Borlaug for his 

many contributions to alleviating world hunger. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12663]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Structural Safety of Department of Veterans 
Affairs Facilities; Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee on Structural 
Safety of Department of Veterans Affairs Facilities has been renewed 
for a 2-year period beginning April 11, 1996, through April 11, 1998.

    Dated: May 13, 1996.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-12663 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-38462, 333-71525, 333-61223,333-63889, and 333-48797) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-68794, 333-43904, 333-40770, 333-40772, 333-37959 and 333-38137) of RCN Corporation and its Subsidiaries of our report dated March 25, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP 

Florham Park, NJ 

April 29, 2004
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit A Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate or Modify 

Seizure Warrants

Exhibit B Declarations Filed in Support of the Motion to Vacate 

or Modify Seizure Warrants

Exhibit C Request for Judicial Notice (without exhibits)

Exhibit D Notice of Related Cases

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 288 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Reeves *v.*The Louisville & Nashville Rd. Co.

(No. 22897

Decided October 7, 1931.)

*Messrs. Anderson & Lamb*and *Mr. H. A. Tetlow,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Freiberg &*Simmonds, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that tbe judgment of tbe said Court of Appeals be, and tbe same is hereby, a'ffi.rmed on authority of *Loftus*v. *Pennsylvania Rd. Co.,*107 Ohio St., 352.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.
CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Geordan Pursglove, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Beyond Commerce, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2020;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly for the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

c)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

d)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 16, 2020
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Huayue Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended August 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




October 22, 2012
/s/ Pan ShudongPan Shudong, Chief Executive Officer








October 22, 2012
/s/ Gan LiuzhiGan Liuzhi, Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona

KEVIN M. RAPP (Ariz. Bar No. 14249, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov)

MARGARET PERLMETER (Ariz. Bar No. 024805, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov)

PETER S. KOZINETS (Ariz. Bar No. 019856, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov) 

ANDREW C. STONE (Ariz. Bar No. 026543, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov)

JOHN J. KUCERA (Cal. Bar No. 274184, john.kucera@usdoj.gov)

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Two Renaissance Square

40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone (602) 514-7500

BRIAN BENCZKOWSKI

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES (Miss. Bar No. 102806, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov) 

Senior Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Room 2116

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone (202) 616-2807 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Dan Hyer,

Defendant.

CR-18-00422-5-PHX-SPL

MOTION TO CONTINUE 

SENTENCING

(First Request)

The United States of America hereby requests this Court continue the sentencing 

currently set for November 19, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. for defendant Dan Hyer for a period of 

six months because it is in the interest of justice. Counsel for defendant has no objection 

to this motion.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 283 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 –

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted this 28th day of August, 2018.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

/s Kevin Rapp

KEVIN M. RAPP

MARGARET PERLMETER

PETER S. KOZINETS

ANDREW C. STONE

JOHN J. KUCERA

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

BRIAN BENCZKOWSKI

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES

Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this same date, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: 

K C Maxwell 

Maxwell Law PC 

899 Ellis St. 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

415-494-8887 

Email: kcm@kcmaxlaw.com

Attorneys for defendant Dan Hyer

s/Zachry Stoebe

US Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 283 Filed 08/28/18 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements (Form F-3, No. 333-136811, Form F-3, No. 333-147762 and Form F-3, No. 333-152738) of EDAP TMS S.A. (the “Company”) of our report dated March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

ERNST &YOUNG Audit

 

/s/ LAURENT CHAPOULAUD

__________________________

 

Represented by 

Laurent Chapoulaud

 

Lyon, France

March 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
Amendment to WABCO Holdings Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.18 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 WABCO HOLDINGS INC. SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, WABCO Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) adopted the WABCO Holdings Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, the Board of
Directors of the Company reserves the right to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined
that it is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to amend the Plan on the terms set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall
be amended as follows, effective as of December 31, 2008: 
 1. The Plan shall be amended to add a definition of “Specified Employee” as
follows: 
 “For purposes of this Plan, ‘Specified Employee’ shall have the meaning set forth in Treas. Reg.
Section 1.409A-1(i), except that ‘compensation’ shall be defined using the rule provided in Treas. Reg. Section 1.415(c)-2(g)(5)(ii).” 
 2. All other terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Company has caused its name
to be signed by its duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	WABCO HOLDINGS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin Tarrant

	Name:	 	 Kevin Tarrant

	Title:	 	 Chief Human Resources Officer