alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 20

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060-10 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060-10 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
STATE OF WASHINGTON , Respondent ,
v. GRIN ARKANIT , Appellant

. No. 84349

- 4

- I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM. Grin Arkanit appeals a trial court order deny ing his motion for post

- conviction DNA testing pursuant to RCW 10.73.170. His court

- appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald , 78 Wn.2d 184,
4 70 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion to withdraw must: [1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counse l’s brief should be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points that he chooses; [4] the court

— not counsel

— then proceeds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. Theobald , 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders , 386 U.S. at 744) (alterations in original). This procedure has been followed. Arkanit’s counsel on appeal filed a brief with the motion to withdraw. Arkanit was served with a copy of the brief,No. 84349

- 4

- I / 2

- 2

- and informed of his right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. Arkanit filed a statement of additional grounds. 1 The material facts are accurately set forth in counsel’s brief in support of the motion to withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this c ourt and has independently reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential issues raised by counsel: whether the trial court violated Arkanit’s right to due process by denying his motion without a hearing, whether the trial court erred by denying Arkanit’s motion for post

- conviction DNA testing, and whether the trial court erred by denying Arkanit’s motion for the appointment of counsel. The court also considered the following issues raised by Arkanit: whether the evi dence was insufficient to support his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree, and whether the trial court erred by not reading the jury instructions orally on the record. The issues raised by counsel and by Arkanit are wholly frivolous. The motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed. FOR THE COURT:

1 Arkanit subsequently filed a motion for extension of time pursuant to RAP 18.8. The motion is denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Financial Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jerry W. Neel, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of J-Kan, Inc., an Arkansas corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 10, 2008  /s/ JERRY W. NEEL, JR. Jerry W. Neel, Jr. President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15270]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Issuance of Permit for Incidental Take of Threatened Species

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 25, 1996, a notice was published in the Federal Register 
(61 FR 18407) that an application had been filed with the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service (Service) by the Smead Manufacturing Company for a 
permit to incidentally take, pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the 
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.), threatened Utah prairie dog (Cynomys parvidens) in conjunction 
with otherwise legal activities including manufacturing facility 
construction and operation, in Cedar City, Iron County, Utah pursuant 
to the Implementation Agreement that implements the Habitat 
Conservation Plan prepared by the Smead Manufacturing Company.
    Notice is hereby given that on May 29, 1996, as authorized by the 
provisions of the Act, the Service issued an incidental take permit 
(permit number PRT-814008) to the above-named party subject to certain 
conditions set forth therein. The permit was granted only after it was 
determined that it was applied for in good faith, that by granting the 
permit it will not be to the disadvantage of the threatened species, 
and that it will be consistent with the purposes and policy set forth 
in the Act, as amended.
    Additional information on this permit action may be obtained by 
contacting the Assistant Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Utah Field Office, 145 East 1300 South Street, Suit 404, Salt 
Lake City, Utah, 84115, telephone (801) 524-5001, between the hours of 
7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays.

    Dated: June 6, 1996.
Ralph O. Morgenweck,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 96-15270 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/Alan StockAlan StockChief Executive Officer  /s/ Carol WaldmanName:
    Carol WaldmanTitle:
    Notary Public
Exhibit 12.3
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Xu Jie Bo, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Southern Airlines Company Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: June 29, 2005 By: /s/ Xu Jie Bo       Name: Xu Jie Bo  Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### Margaret SMITH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL OF KIRKWOOD, et al., Defendants/Respondents.

No. 65213.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 28, 1995.

C. Finn Sheehan, High Ridge, for appellant.

Ben Ely, Jr., Kortenhof *&*Ely, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based upon a jury verdict in a wrongful death case. Plaintiff alleged that the death of her daughter was caused by the negligence of Dr. Zoeseh, an employee of St. Joseph’s Hospital. The evidence in support of the jury verdict was not insufficient and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. A statement in support of this decision has been furnished to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Harold Forzley, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 11, 2008  /s/ Harold Forzley Harold Forzley Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. (949) 369-3700 December 7, 2020 Bienert | Katzman PC 903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350 San Clemente CA 92673 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-SMB Susan Brnovich December 4, 2020 United States v. Michael Lacey, et al. Phoenix Arizona ✔

✔

Motion Hearing December 4, 2020 ✔

✔

tthomas@bienertkatzman.com /s/ Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. December 7, 2020

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1098 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 966 

Calling on the President and the Secretary of Education to fire Kevin 

Jennings from his post as ‘‘Safe Schools Czar’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2009 

Mr. BURGESS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Calling on the President and the Secretary of Education 

to fire Kevin Jennings from his post as ‘‘Safe Schools Czar’’. 

Whereas, on December 11, 2009, The Washington Times reported that Kevin Jennings was involved in promoting a 

reading list for children 13 years old or older that made 

the most explicit sex between children and adults seem 

normal and acceptable; 

Whereas recorded tapings from conferences previously sponsored by Kevin Jennings had presenters explicitly conveying to adolescents certain types of sexual behavior; 

Whereas Kevin Jennings has praised Harry Hay, a vocal supporter of the North American Man Boy Love Association 

(NAMBLA); and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HRES 966 IH 

Whereas Kevin Jennings in his capacity as ‘‘Safe Schools 

Czar’’ may not promote criminal behavior: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) considers the behavior of a ‘‘Safe Schools 

3 Czar’’ promoting sexual relationships between adults 

4 and children reprehensible; 

5 (2) supports the belief that any and all who oc6 cupy the position of ‘‘Safe Schools Czar’’ should not 

7 promote criminal behavior; and 

8 (3) calls on the President and the Secretary of 

9 Education to find an immediate replacement for 

10 Kevin Jennings. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PACIFIC GOLDRIM RESOURCES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Jason Schlombs, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

JASON SCHLOMBSJason SchlombsChief Executive and Chief Financial OfficerJune 11, 2007














































---
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 12

                   KSL RECREATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                             YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31,
(in Thousands, except ratios)
                                                            1999        1998         1997         1996          1995
                                                            ----        ----         ----         -----         ----
<S>                                                      <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
Earnings:
   Income (loss) before income taxes and
   extraordinary item ..............................     $ 40,950     $  7,117     $  2,944     $(12,461)     $(16,172)

Add:
   Interest and  amortization of debt issuance costs       51,779       35,652       31,709       28,769        23,954

   Minority interests in losses of subsidiary ......          118          129          143           58           201
                                                         --------     --------     --------     --------      --------

Total Earnings .....................................     $ 92,847     $ 42,898     $ 34,796     $ 16,366      $  7,983
                                                         ========     ========     ========     ========      ========

Fixed charges:
   Interest and  amortization of debt issuance costs     $ 51,779     $ 35,652     $ 31,709     $ 28,769      $ 23,954

   Capitalized interest ............................        1,619          754            0          577         1,043
                                                         --------     --------     --------     --------      --------
Subtotal ...........................................     $ 53,398     $ 36,406     $ 31,709     $ 29,346      $ 24,997
                                                         --------     --------     --------     --------      --------


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1) .............         1.7x         1.2x         1.1x            -             -
                                                         ========     ========     ========     ========      ========
</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings for fiscal 1996 and 1995 were insufficient to cover fixed charges
     by $12,980 and $17,014, respectively.
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1174 Filed 06/21/21 Page 1 of 1