alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                     Exhibit 11
                                          
                    KSL RECREATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                          
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                          
                                          
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31,
                                                                          1997           1996           1995
                                                                          ----           ----           ----

<S>                                                                    <C>           <C>            <C>       
NET INCOME (LOSS):
  Income (loss) before extraordinary item. . . . . . . . . . . . .     $   2,801     $  (12,379)    $  (16,172)
  Extraordinary gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt. . . .        (3,164)        32,120              -
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------
  Net income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     $    (363)    $   19,741     $  (16,172)
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------

DATA AS TO NUMBER OF COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES:
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding . . . . . .         1,000          1,000          1,000
  Common equivalent shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             -              -              -
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------
  Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         1,000          1,000          1,000
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE -- Primary & Fully Diluted
  Income (loss) per share before extraordinary item. . . . . . . .     $   2,801     $  (12,379)    $  (16,172)
  Extraordinary gain (loss) per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        (3,164)        32,120              -
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE -- Primary & Fully Diluted . . . . . . .     $    (363)    $   19,741     $  (16,172)
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------
                                                                       ----------    -----------    -----------

</TABLE>
election shall be made not later than the date hereof and shall be irrevocable when made.The terms of such deferral shall be in accordance with the elections of the Participant set forthon the “RSU Deferral Election Form” attached as Exhibit A to this Award Agreement. In the eventthat the RSUs become payable as a result of an accelerated vesting and payment date under Section 3hereof, the terms thereof shall apply and the RSUs shall become payable in accordance therewith inlieu of any deferral payment election.Section 7. Section 409A Compliance. It is intended that the terms of this RSU Awardwill comply with Section 409A of the Code to the extent applicable, and will be interpreted andconstrued in a manner consistent with such intent. Any payment under the RSU Award that is to bemade hereunder as a result of the Participant’s termination of service must satisfy therequirements for a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.Section 8. Restrictions on Transfer. Except as provided in Section 10.6 of the Plan,neither this RSU Award nor any RSUs covered hereby may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned orotherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will, by the laws of descent and distribution,other than to Company as a result of forfeiture of the RSUs as provided herein.Section 9. No Voting Rights. The RSUs granted pursuant to this Award, whether or notvested, will not confer any voting rights upon the Participant, unless and until the Award is paidin Shares.Section 10. Award Subject to Plans. This RSU Award is subject to the terms of thePlan, the terms and provisions of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In the event of aconflict or ambiguity between any term or provision contained herein and a term or provision of thePlan, the Plan will govern and prevail.Section 11. Changes for Corporate Events. The RSUs under this RSU Award shall besubject to the provisions of Section 10.13 of the Plan relating to adjustments by the Board as aresult of certain Corporate Events.Section 12. Governing Law. This Award Agreement shall be construed and enforced inaccordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the choice of lawprinciples thereof.[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
 
2

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Award as of the date first written above.      RCN CORPORATION
#### Mildred BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-50047.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 2003.

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Mildred Butler appeals the dismissal of her suit brought under title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. The district court explained its reasons for dismissal in a comprehensive memorandum opinion and order filed November 4, 2002, and entered the next day.

The district court opined that this action is barred by *res judicata.*We agree. As the district court noted, “No matter how Plaintiff may wish to characterize the current case, she is still essentially alleging that she was discriminated against because of her age, race, and prior complaints.” In Butler’s earlier action, the district court ruled that her dismissal was the result of poor performance, not discrimination; this court affirmed, and warned of sanctions if the litigation was further protracted.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

James Larkin (2), et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-DJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants James Larkin, Michael Lacey, Scott Spear, Jed 

Brunst, Andrew Padilla, and Joye Vaught’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to 

Reply, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion. Defendants shall file their reply to the 

pending motion to dismiss on or before May 12, 2023.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1579-1 Filed 05/02/23 Page 1 of 1
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1820 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S. (the "Company")
on Form  20-F/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, SOREN
DEGN, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  November 2, 2005                           /s/ SOREN DEGN
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Soren Degn
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer of XenaCare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report").



The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 18th day of November 2008.



| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | ------------------------------
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | XENACARE HOLDINGS, INC.       
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | /s/ Bobby Story               
| |  |  | Name: Bobby Story             
| |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.46
 (ATMI LOGO)
    
    Corporate Headquarters
7 Commerce Drive 
Danbury, Connecticut 06810
    
    800.766.2681 Telephone
512.794.1100 Direct
512.792.8040 Facsimile
www.atmi.com
  BY CERTIFIED MAIL  RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
 
 c/o:
    
    Melvyn J. Powers of Commerce Park Management Company, its Manager and President, on behalf
of Commerce Park Realty, LLC (the Lessor) regarding the Lease for 7 Commerce Drive, Danbury,
CT 06810 between Lessor and Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. (the Lessee)
 References:
    
    The Agreement of Lease dated December 23, 1994 between Melvyn J. Powers and
Mary P. Powers, d/b/a M&M Realty, as original Lessor, and Lessee, as lessee (the
Original Lease), as amended by (i) First Addendum to Lease dated January 27, 1995 (the
First Addendum), (ii) Second Addendum to Lease dated February 24, 1995 (the Second
Addendum), (iii) First Amendment to Agreement of Lease between Lessor and Lessee dated
as of November 22, 2000 (the First Amendment), (iv) Second Amendment to Agreement of
Lease between Lessor and Lessee dated as of March 24, 2003 (the Second Amendment), (v)
the Third Amendment to Agreement of Lease between Lessor and Lessee dated as of January
18, 2007 (the Third Amendment), and (vi) the Fourth Amendment to Agreement of Lease
between Lessor and Lessee dated as of October 30, 2008 (the Fourth Amendment);
collectively with the Original Lease, the First Addendum, the Second Addendum, the First
Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Third Amendment and the Fourth Amendment referred
to herein as the Lease).
     
 cc:
    
    Mr. Tim Carlson  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, ATMI via email
Randy Green  Director Global Facilities & EHS, ATMI via email
Heather Schroder, Assistant Corporate Counsel, ATMI via email
John R. Ward, Esq., Pullman & Comley, 850 Main Street, P.O. Box 7006, Bridgeport, CT 06601-7006
#### James M. GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48433.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 5, 1994.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owen-son Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and KENNEDY and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from dismissal of Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Deeandre Moore, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. CV-18-00307-PHX-DWL 

ORDER 

Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13). The R&R, which was issued on March 1, 

2019, recommended that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice and further 

provided that “[t]he parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy 

of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court.” 

(Doc. 13 at 13.) 

Here, no such objections have been filed. Thus, the Court accepts the Magistrate 

Judge’s recommendation. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985) (“It does 

not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual 

or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to 

those findings.”); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[N]o 

review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 

filed.”). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1221 (9th Cir. 2003) 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(“[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 

de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”). 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R’s recommended disposition (Doc. 

13) is accepted, that the Petition (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice, and that 

the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability and leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because petitioner has not made a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and because the dismissal of the 

petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the 

procedural ruling debatable. 

 Dated this 3rd day of April, 2019.
No. 72-1005.

#### Sierra Club et al. *v.*Morton, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zhijuan
      Guo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Zhijuan GuoZhijuan
                GuoChief
                Financial Officer





This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          40,130
<SECURITIES>                                    13,007
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,179<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,736
<INVENTORY>                                      1,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,901
<PP&E>                                         227,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 645,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,605
<BONDS>                                        131,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   645,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,677
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,715<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   531
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)<F2>
        
<FN>
<F1>Receivables and total costs have been restated to conform with the December 
1997 reporting format.
<F2>EPS has been restated to give effect to a two for one stock split payable in
the form of a 100% stock dividend, declared in March 1998 for stockholders of 
record on March 20, 1998, with a distribution date of April 3, 1998.
</FN> 

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 6 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 6

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 14, 2009.
Whereas coaches are a vital part of organized youth sports;
Whereas approximately 42 million American children participate in organized 
        sports each year, but more than 20 million children in the United States 
        lack the opportunity to participate in organized sports, in part because 
        of an insufficient number of coaches;
Whereas a national effort to promote coaching is needed to increase the number 
        of adults serving as coaches in youth sports;
Whereas the purpose of the Congressional Caucus on Youth Sports is to educate 
        Members of Congress, the media, and the public on the need to restore a 
        child-centered focus in youth sports that will produce immeasurable 
        positive benefits for the well-being and character development of 
        children;
Whereas sports and coaches help children fight obesity, increase their self-
        esteem, learn leadership skills, and discover how to incorporate the 
        values of sports into other aspects of their daily lives;
Whereas youth sports activity can reduce gang participation and youth violence;
Whereas children need adults who will believe in them and who give children the 
        support they need to be a success;
Whereas coaches can positively impact the physical, emotional, and educational 
        life of children;
Whereas coaches who volunteer their time help educate children, serve as role 
        models, and, in some situations, are parental surrogates; and
Whereas the designation of the week of September 13 through 19, 2009, as 
        National Coach Appreciation Week would raise awareness and leverage 
        resources to engage millions of children in organized sports that 
        promote health, nutrition, and fitness, as well as other youth 
        development outcomes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the significant contribution coaches make in the life 
        of children who participate in organized sports;
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of National Coach Appreciation 
        Week; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe National 
        Coach Appreciation Week with appropriate recognition, activities, and 
        programs to demonstrate the importance of sports and coaches in the life 
        of children.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```