alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grand Motion Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with  the Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date  hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  August 17, 2007


/s/ Nikolay Bulbash
---------------------------
Nikolay Bulbash
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
Treasurer, principal accounting
officer and Director
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

United States District Cc ourt DISTRICT of ARIZONA.
United States of America DOCKET NO.
: SEALED
Ahmad Suhad Ahm: ad MAGISTRATE'S CASE NO,
DOB: 1988; U.S. Citizen {? i 08 7 4 ou J

Complaint for violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846

COMPLAINANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS CONSTITUTING THE OFFENSE OR VIOLATION:

From a time unknown, and continuing to on or about March 7, 2017, at or near Tucson, in the District of Arizona,
Ahmad Suhad Ahmad did knowingly and intentionally combine, conspire, confederate and agree with persons known
and unknown, to possess with intent to distribute 100 grams or more, but less than 1 kilogram of heroin, that is,
approximately 150 grams of heroin, a Schedule I controlled substance; in violation of Title 21, United States Code,
Sections 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). :

All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846.
BASIS OF COMPLAINANT'S CHARGE AGAINST THE ACCUSED:
In January and February 2017, Ahmad Suhad Ahmad (Ahmad) asked confidential sources (CS1 and CS2) if they were
interested in purchasing heroin. Ahmad agreed to sell heroin to CS1 and CS2 for $35 per gram that Ahmad would
obtain from his neighbor (aka “Pancho”). On February 27, 2017, Ahmad met with CS1 and CS2 at 4875 E. Wyoming,
Lot 22, Tucson, Arizona. Ahmad advised CS1 and CS2 that he only had 50 grams of heroin available that he would
sell to them for $27 per gram. Ahmad went next door to Pancho’s property to purchase the heroin. Ahmad then pulled
up in a white Nissan Xterra and handed CS2 a plastic bag containing a dark substance. CS1 paid $1,600 to Ahmad
($1,300 for Pancho and $300 for Ahmad) since they originally agreed to $35 per gram for the heroin. Ahmad told
CS1 he would have more heroin available the next day for CS1 to purchase. FBI agents conducted surveillance of the
heroin transaction and provided the dark substance, upon receipt from CS1 and CS2, to the FBI Evidence Control
Technician for processing. Analysis conducted by the DEA Regional Laboratory concluded the dark substance
contained the properties of heroin and weighed 45.3 grams.

On March 1, 2017, CS1 and CS2 met Ahmad at Lot 22. Ahmad told Pancho that CS1 was interested in purchasing
more heroin at a later date. On March 4, 2017, Ahmad’s brother, Mohammed Ahmad, asked CS1 if he was interested
in purchasing more heroin. CS1 told Mohammed that he wanted to purchase another 100 grams of heroin, so
Mohammed informed Ahmed. On March 7, 2017, CS! met Ahmad at Lot 22 to complete the heroin transaction.
Ahmad told CS} that he will pay Pancho $27 per gram for the heroin. When Ahmad tried to purchase the 100 grams
of heroin, Pancho had sold all of his supply earlier that day.

MATERIAL WITNESSES IN RELATION TO THE CHARGE:

DETENTION REQUESTED ‘SIGNATURE OF COMPLAINANT (official title)
Being duly sworn, I declare that ‘oregoing is ee

true and correct to the ‘OFFICIAL TITLE

AUTHORIZED AUSA Cory P| SPecue Ager]

SIGNATURE OF ATAGIST] DATE

November 8, 2017

» See Federal rules of Criminal Procedure Rules 3 aud 84

Za Me VE
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager ofthe Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 13, 2008                    |                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                          |                  |
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |
|                                               |                       |  |

 

----
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                April 30, 2008 |                             /s/ Jana Whitlock |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Jana                Whitlock, President, CEO, CFO,                                                        |
|                                 | Treasurer                and Director (Principal Executive                                                |
|                                 | Officer)                                                                                                  |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2011 

p0421 

Order 

 

April 28, 2011 

142089 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142089 

 COA: 299297 

Macomb CC: 2007-005849-FH 

CEDRIC JAMES SIMPSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration, as on leave granted, of the issue whether the trial court erred in requiring 

the defendant to register under the Sex Offenders Registration Act, MCL 28.721 et seq. 

The Court of Appeals currently has before it the case of People v Gentile, Docket No. 

295570, a case we remanded for consideration as on leave granted on November 24, 

2010, and that involves an issue similar to that presented in this case. We note that the 

court’s disposition in Gentile may be instructive in resolving the issue specified in this 

order. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                               [ERIC L. WESTON LETTERHEAD]



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
               --------------------------------------------------

I consent to the incorporation by reference on Form 10K (File No. 0-29346) of
FRM Nexus, Inc. and Subsidiaries of my report dated March 25, 1997, on my audits
of the financial statements of Wendcello Corp. as of February 23, 1997 and
February 25, 1996 and for the fiscal years then ended, which report is included
on Form 10K.


                                            /s/ Eric L. Weston
                                            -------------------
                                            Eric L. Weston
                                            Certified Public Accountant


Westbury, New York
June 4, 1998
























                                 EXHIBIT 23.02

<PAGE>   2
                                               [ERIC L. WESTON LETTERHEAD]



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
               --------------------------------------------------

I consent to the incorporation by reference on Form 10K (File No. 0-29346) of
FRM Nexus, Inc. and Subsidiaries of my report dated March 25, 1997, on my audits
of the financial statements of Wendclark Corp. as of February 23, 1997 and
February 25, 1996 and for the fiscal years then ended, which report is included
on Form 10K.


                                            /s/ Eric L. Weston
                                            -------------------
                                            Eric L. Weston
                                            Certified Public Accountant


Westbury, New York
June 4, 1998
























                                 EXHIBIT 23.02
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grand Motion Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed  with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"), the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated  below, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  August 17, 2007

/s/ Janetta Voitenkova
---------------------------
Janetta Voitenkova
President, Chief Executive
Officer, and Director
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Andrew Padilla,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-0422-06-PHX-DJH

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Appear by 

Telephone or Video Teleconference (Doc. 1702). Defense counsel requests that Defendant 

Padilla be permitted to appear by telephone or video teleconference for the August 18, 

2023, Frye/Cooper hearing stating that:

The grounds for this request are that Mr. Padilla resides in the Dallas, Texas 

area. The round trip fare to fly from Dallas to Phoenix and back is at least 

$660 or more, and the hotel cost for one night would be approximately $200. 

These expenses do not include ground transportation. This is a considerable 

outlay of funds for Mr. Padilla.

(Id. at 1). Upon good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Appear by Telephone 

or Video Teleconference (Doc. 1702). Defendant may appear telephonically for the 

scheduled Frye/Cooper hearing set August 18, 2023, at 11:30 a.m. before Judge Fine in 

courtroom 303. Defense counsel will receive dial-in instructions via separate electronic 

communication.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1703 Filed 08/16/23 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court finds no excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

Dated this 16th day of August, 2023.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1703 Filed 08/16/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 882 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 882

Commending Chief William J. Bratton for his service as Chief of Police 
                            of Los Angeles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mr. Berman, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Weiner, and Ms. 
 Harman) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commending Chief William J. Bratton for his service as Chief of Police 
                            of Los Angeles.

Whereas Chief William Bratton, who has served as Chief of Police of the Los 
        Angeles Police Department since 2002, has announced his intent to resign 
        that post effective October 31, 2009;
Whereas William Bratton has served with distinction as Chief of Police of the 
        cities of Boston, New York, and Los Angeles;
Whereas Chief Bratton's leadership helped reduce violent crime by 36 percent in 
        New York City during his tenure, in part by creating the successful 
        CompStat program to track real time crime data;
Whereas the CompStat model has been adapted and expanded in police departments 
        around the Nation in order to maximize efficient use of police resources 
        and promote accountability;
Whereas under Chief Bratton's leadership, crime in Los Angeles has decreased for 
        6 consecutive years;
Whereas violent crime in Los Angeles has decreased by 30 percent from 2002 to 
        2008, while homicides decreased 42 percent, in both cases far exceeding 
        national rates of declines;
Whereas Chief Bratton has emphasized community policing and built strong 
        relationships with minority communities around Los Angeles;
Whereas Chief Bratton has been a leader in the fight against gang violence, both 
        by cracking down on gang leadership and by enlisting community support 
        to develop alternatives to gang membership for young people; and
Whereas gang related homicides decreased by more than half from 350 in 2002 to 
        167 in 2008: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends William J. 
Bratton for his past and future service in the interest of public 
safety and congratulates him on his successful tenure as Chief of 
Police of Los Angeles.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DOUGLAS EATON , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No s . 4D 16

- 3708 & 4D16

- 4148

[ February 1, 2018 ]

Consolidated a ppeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 13

- 13035 CF10A and 16000586 CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER , C.J., T AYLOR and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
13.1




CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company Limited
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Tan Wan Geng, President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      December 8, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Tan Wan GengName:
      Tan Wan GengTitle:
      President




* This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Richard A. Robert                                                                                                                                           |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard                A. Robert                                                                                                                                               |   |
| Executive                Vice President andChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial Officer)                 May                15, 2008 |   |

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual Report of RiT Technologies Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Liam Galin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Liam Galin

Liam Galin

Chief Executive Officer

June 30, 2003
#### Rosemary GALVAN and Arnulfo Galvan, Appellants, v. AMERICA’S FAVORITE CHICKEN COMPANY f/k/a A1 Copeland Enterprises and Raul Briseno, Appellees.

No. 04-96-00358-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

Oct. 23, 1996.

See also, 897 S.W.2d 874.

Daniel R. Rutherford, The Law Offices of Daniel R. Rutherford, Alex Katzman, The Law Offices of Katzman *&*Katzman, San Antonio, for Appellants.

J. Daniel Harkins, Brett W. Schouest, Cox & Smith Incorporated, San Antonio, for Ap-pellees.

Before CHAPA, C.J., and STONE and GREEN, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appeal of a slip and fall claim. The claim was originally filed in Bex-ar County, but Rosemary Galvan non-suited so that she and her husband could refile the same suit in Maverick County. The proposed order of non-suit that the Galvans’ counsel prepared for signature, however, inadvertently granted the non-suit with prejudice. In an attempt to undo that error, counsel obtained a judgment nunc pro tunc which granted a non-suit without prejudice. That effort was reversed on appeal and the original dismissal with prejudice was rein*410stated. *See America’s Favorite Chicken Co. v. Galvan,*897 S.W.2d 874 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1995, writ denied). The Maverick County trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants on the ground of res judicata and this appeal ensued.

Res Judicata

The Galvans urge reversal claiming they have been deprived of their day in court. They argue that a voluntary dismissal of the Bexar County case did not constitute a trial in which the issues were fully and fairly litigated, hence there can be no res judicata. They are unable to cite a single case in support of this theory. Rather, they dispute the findings already settled in the earlier appeal and attempt to distinguish each case the appellees have cited in *their*brief. We have already determined that “orders of non-suits or dismissals with prejudice do constitute an adjudication on the merits.” *Id.*at 877-78; *see also Thompson v. Texas Dep’t of Human Resources,*859 S.W.2d 482, 482 (Tex. App. — San Antonio 1993, no writ) (same).

Regardless of whether the dismissal with prejudice was voluntary or involuntary, the Galvans are barred by the principle of res judicata from relitigating the same claims in Maverick County. *See Jones v. Nightingale,*900 S.W.2d 87, 90 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1995, writ ref d) (res judicata applies to voluntarily withdrawn claims when withdrawn with prejudice). This bar to relitigation extends to Arnulfo Galvan’s derivative claims as well. *Id.*Appellants’ points of error one and two are overruled.

The Galvans alternatively argue against the application of collateral estoppel in this case. Because summary judgment was specifically granted only on the principle of res judicata, this argument does not apply here. Appellants’ third alternative point of error is overruled. The summary judgment is affirmed.