alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (Nos. 33-77060-99, 333-35323, 333-49561, 333-55827, 333-56349,333-46222 and 333-107591) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-82089, 333-94641, 333-31982, 333-46224 and 333-76378) of our report datedJanuary 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of ATMI, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: September 19, 2024

CASE OF: Tyrone T. Johnson v. State of Florida

DOCKET NO.: SC2023-0055

OPINION FILED: July 11, 2024

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE IN THE 

ABOVE OPINION:

On p. 25, line 7, “jury” was changed to “trial court”.

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
M. Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
year ended February 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
      19, 2010
            By:
            /s/ David
      M. MorseName:
      David M. Morse
              Title:
      Co-President and Chief Executive Officer





I,
Desiree Mejia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report of Location
Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended
February 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
      19, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Desiree
      MejiaName:
      Desiree Mejia
              Title:
      Chief Operating Officer, Principal Financial
              Officer
      and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RCN Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David C. McCourt, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David C.
McCourt

David C. McCourt

March 30, 2004



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to RCN Corporation
and will be retained by RCN Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of XenaCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Rizzo, President (principal executive officer), certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: August 19, 2009





| |  |  |                                                            
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |                                                            
| |  |  | XENACARE HOLDINGS, INC.                                    
| |  |  |                                                            
| |  |  | /s/ Frank Rizzo                                            
| |  |  | Name: Frank Rizzo,                                         
| |  |  | Title: President (principal executive officer)
and Director
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14505]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP92-50-006 and RP92-50-008]


High Island Offshore System; Notice of Informal Technical 
Conference

June 4, 1996.
    On May 7, 1993, High Island Offshore System (HIOS) filed a refund 
report in Docket No. RP92-50-006. On June 3, 1993, HIOS filed a revised 
refund plan in Docket No. RP92-50-008 to correct alleged errors 
discovered by HIOS in the calculation of its earlier refunds. When the 
parties were unable to resolve their disputes regarding the appropriate 
refund amount, the Commission staff issued a data request.
    That request included: (1) Workpapers showing in full detail the 
derivation of each component of each shipper's refund amount set forth 
in(a) HIOS' refund report filed on May 7, 1993, and (b) HIOS' revised 
refund plan filed on June 3, 1993; and (2) an explanation of the refund 
in the amount of $484,907.84 received by HIOS from ANR Pipeline Company 
(ANR) as reported to the Commission by ANR on July 29, 1993, in Docket 
No. RP92-45-005.
    The parties still have not resolved their dispute regarding the 
refund due, and the Commission staff wishes to explore several issues 
based on the additional information that has been provided. The issues 
to be addressed include: (1) The level of HIOS' refund obligation 
pursuant to a settlement in this proceeding; (2) the level of such 
refunds actually made by HIOS to date; and (3) the level of such 
refunds that remain to be made by HIOS (if any). The parties should be 
prepared to support their conclusions with specific references to the 
additional work papers and information that have been provided to the 
Commission.
    Therefore, the Staff will hold an informal technical conference on 
this matter at 10:00 a.m., June 13, 1996, at 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., in a room to be designated at that time. Questions 
about this conference should be directed to John M. Robinson, (202) 
208-0808, or Randall W. Adams, (202) 208-0102.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14505 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### John M. HALE, Respondent-Appellant, v. Laurie A. HALE, Petitioner-Respondent.

No. 64654.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 18, 1994.

William J. O’Herin, Florissant, for appellant.

Frank Susman, Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

Appellant, John M. Hale (“husband”), appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dismissing his motion to modify that portion of his dissolution decree relating to child support and child custody. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15030]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

    Summary: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Annual Earnings Questionnaire for Annuitants 
in Last Pre-Retirement Non-Railroad Employment.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: G-19L.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0179.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: July 31, 1996.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 6,000.
    (8) Total annual responses: 6,000.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 3,000.
    (10) Collection description: Under Section 2(e)(3) of the Railroad 
Retirement Act, an annuity is not payable or is reduced for any month 
in which the beneficiary works for a railroad or earns more than the 
prescribed amounts. The collection obtains earnings information needed 
by the Railroad Retirement Board to determine possible reductions in 
annuities because of LPE earnings.
    Additional Information or Comments: Copies of the form and 
supporting documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency 
clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information 
collection should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement 
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB 
reviewer, Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-15030 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

                             Northwest Savings Bank

                             Jamestown Savings Bank

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF NORTHWEST SAVINGS BANK


Northwest Financial Services, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

Great Northwest Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation

Northwest Consumer Discount Company, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation which
operates under this name in five locations in Western and Central Pennsylvania
and also operates:

          d/b/a Northwest Finance Company in Jamestown, NY, a New York
          Corporation

          d/b/a Butler Consumer Discount Company in eight locations in
          Southwestern PA

          d/b/a Uniontown Financial Services in Uniontown, PA

          d/b/a Erie Consumer Discount in three locations in Erie, PA

          d/b/a Franklin Consumer Discount in Franklin, PA

          d/b/a Corry Consumer Discount in Corry, PA

          d/b/a Community Consumer Discount in Warren, PA

         d/b/a Thrift Financial Services in Indiana, PA

          d/b/a Clearfield Consumer Discount in Clearfield, PA

          d/b/a Titusville Consumer Discount in Titusville, PA

          d/b/a Lewistown Consumer Discount in Lewistown, PA

          d/b/a Jeannette Financial Services in Jeannette, PA

          d/b/a Zelie Consumer Discount in Zelienople, PA

          d/b/a Johnstown Consumer Discount in Johnstown, PA

          d/b/a Washington Consumer Discount in Washington, PA

          d/b/a St. Mary's Consumer Discount in St. Marys, PA

          d/b/a Brookville Financial Services in Brookville, PA

          d/b/a Dubois Financial Services in Dubois, PA

          d/b/a Hazleton Financial Services in Hazleton, PA

          d/b/a State College Financial Services in State College, PA

          d/b/a Pottsville Financial Services in Pottsville, PA

          d/b/a Williamsport Financial Services in Williamsport, PA

          d/b/a Altoona Financial Services in Altoona, PA

          d/b/a Punxsutawney Financial Services in Punxsutawney, PA

          d/b/a Huntingdon Financial Services in Huntingdon, PA

          d/b/a Belle Vernon Financial Services in Belle Vernon, PA

          d/b/a Latrobe Financial Services in Latrobe, PA

          d/b/a Reading Financial Services in Sinking Spring, PA

          d/b/a Bloomsburg Financial Services in Bloomsburg, PA

          d/b/a Sunbury Financial Services in Sunbury, PA

          d/b/a Mercer Financial Services in Mercer, PA

Northwest Capital Group Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

Rid-Fed Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

Allegheny Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
October 6, 2023

CJA E-Voucher

(Via Email Only)

Re: 18-cr-00422

 Client: Scott Spear

Dear E-Voucher Unit,

The purpose of this letter is to provide justification for the less-than-30-day turnaround 

for the approximately 1.5 hour transcript in this case on September 25, 2023.

The hearing in question involved oral argument on evidentiary matters pertaining to the 

Government’s first witness, and possible others to follow. That first witness is still on the 

stand. 

The Court made rulings that are not otherwise memorialized in any orders, and I need 

that transcript to guide me so as not to violate any of the court’s rulings. The Court has 

already admonished all defense counsel that they have, from time to time, overstepped 

her evidentiary boundaries. Part of the problem is the lack of anything in writing that 

defines those boundaries. The best evidence of the Court’s rulings are the orders that the 

Court made during the September 25 hearing. 

I you need anything further on this subject, please let me know.

Sincerely,

Eric W. Kessler

EWK/hs

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1846-1 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 1
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| /s/ Richard A. Robert                                                                                                                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Robert                                                                                                                       |   |
| Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) November 5, 2010 |   |
Exhibit B 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-2 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 2
April 13, 2018

Via Email

tom@henzecookmurphy.com

janey@henzecookmurphy.com

Tom Henze

Janey Henze Cook

Henze Cook Murphy PLLC

4645 North 32nd Street, Suite 150 

Phoenix, AZ 85018

Dear Mr. Henze and Ms. Henze Cook, 

I respectfully request that you and your firm comply with the Arizona Rules of 

Professional Conduct as they relate to your duties to former clients.1

Now that I have entered guilty pleas in the federal and California matters related to 

Backpage, I believe an incurable conflict has now arisen as between me and each of 

the defendants in federal Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-SPL (D. Ariz.) and California Superior

Court Case No. 16FE024013. This includes a direct, incurable conflict between me and 

Mr. Larkin and Mr. Lacey. 

To the extent that you may assert that I have waived the protections afforded to me as a 

former client of your firm, I do not agree. As stated in my letter to your firm dated April 6, 

2018, I have withdrawn any prior waiver that may have existed regarding conflicts of 

interest. I further believe that any prior informed consent would no longer be valid, as 

the issuance of a federal indictment in this matter has materially changed the facts and 

circumstances surrounding any such consent. 

Sincerely, 

Carl Ferrer 

CC: Nanci Clarence, Jonathan Baum

																																																												 1 See Rule	of	Professional	Conduct	1.9(a)	(“A	lawyer	who	has	formerly	represented	a	client	in	a	matter	shall	not	

thereafter	represent	another	person	in	the	same	or	a	substantially	related	matter	in	which	that	person’s	interests	

are	materially	adverse	to	the	interests	of	the	former	client	unless	the	former	client	gives	informed	consent,	

confirmed	in	writing.”).	

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-2 Filed 04/25/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company") for the three month ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Roger Crystal, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: June 11, 2010
By:
/s/Seijin KiSeijin KiChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. (“Globe”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Globe on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Globe. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Globe and will be retained by Globe and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: February 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Jeff BradleyJeff BradleyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: February 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Malcolm AppelbaumMalcolm AppelbaumChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 948 

Commending the participants and organizers of the World March for Peace 

and Nonviolence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

PAYNE, and Mr. RANGEL) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the participants and organizers of the World 

March for Peace and Nonviolence. 

Whereas World Without Wars is coordinating a World March 

for Peace and Nonviolence; 

Whereas the international team of participants began their 

93-day, 99,000-mile journey around the world on October 

2, 2009, the 140th anniversary of the birth of Mahatma 

Gandhi; 

Whereas, October 2, 2009, is also the United Nations’ International Day of Non-Violence, which is observed globally 

and is intended to promote peace through education and 

increased public awareness; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 948 IH 

Whereas the World March for Peace and Nonviolence started 

in Wellington, New Zealand, and will end in Punta de 

Vacas, Aconcagua, Argentina, on January 2, 2010; 

Whereas New Zealand was selected as the country in which 

to start the march because it was the first country to 

grant women the right to vote and to ban nuclear weapons and it is the only country in the world to create a 

Minister for Disarmament and Arms Control; 

Whereas New Zealand was also ranked first on the 2009 

Global Peace Index, an annual study ranking 144 countries on their relative peacefulness; 

Whereas the idea of a World March for Peace and Nonviolence was developed during the Symposium of the 

World Center for Humanist Studies held at the Park of 

Study and Reflection in Punta de Vacas, Aconcagua, Argentina, on November 15, 2008; 

Whereas participants in the World March for Peace and Nonviolence will travel through six continents and visit at 

least 90 countries in 3 months; 

Whereas the World March for Peace and Nonviolence will 

visit Washington, DC on December 1 and 2, 2009; and 

Whereas the purpose of the World March for Peace and Nonviolence is to raise awareness about global movements 

against violence, war, weapons, and nuclear proliferation: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends the participants and organizers of the World March 

3 for Peace and Nonviolence for their commitment to global 

4 peace and nonviolence. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS