alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeurogesX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeurogesX, Inc.

Dated: August 14, 2009



By:

/s/    Anthony A. DiTonnoAnthony A. DiTonnoPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/    Stephen F. GhiglieriStephen F. GhiglieriChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1271 Filed 09/04/21 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00502-CV

The University of Texas Medical Branch Correctional Managed Care, Appellant

v.

Brenda Alexander, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-07-002319, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant The University of Texas Medical Branch Correctional Managed Care has

notified this Court that it no longer wishes to pursue its appeal and has filed a voluntary motion to

dismiss. Appellee Brenda Alexander has not objected or otherwise responded to the motion. We

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: December 4, 2012
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony L. SPEARS, Appellant. Anthony W. SPEARS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48616, WD 49784.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 25, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 29, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 24, 1995.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and SMART and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated appeal of conviction, after jury trial, of second degree murder, § 565.021, RSMo (1986), three counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015.1, RSMo (1986), and two counts of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo (1986), and the dismissal of appellant’s untimely *pro se*Rule 29.15 motion.

Judgment of convictions and dismissal of Rule 29.15 motion affirmed.

Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CombiMatrix Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15,2010 (the “Report”), I, Scott R. Burell,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, based on my knowledge:

 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:                                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                            |
|   | /s/ SCOTT R. BURELL                             |
|   | Scott R. Burell                                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                         |
|   | *(Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer)* |
|   | November 15,  2010                         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

*This certification accompanies this report and is being furnishedpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed “filed” by theRegistrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent thatthe Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference into such a filing.*

 

----
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Fortunato Villamagna, certify that:




1.


2.


3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.    The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(3)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the
Registrant and have:





a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which the report is being prepared;





b.    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;





c.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d.    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.    The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design of operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





December 14, 2009


/s/ Fortunato Villamagna


Fortunato Villamagna


CEO
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat                       
|Name: Aviv Efrat Date: August 9, 2007
#### Herbert A. KASTEN, Jr., Appellant, v. Maryanne HASTEN, Respondent.

No. 68612.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

July 30, 1996.

James M. Smith. Huck, Hasten & Smith, St. Louis, for appellant.

Richard W. Fischer, Clayton, for respondent.

Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals, and Wife cross-appeals, from the judgment of dissolution of their marriage.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976)[1-3]. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit A 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1975-1 Filed 11/16/23 Page 1 of 2
From: David Morgan, Publisher

To: editor@cochisecountyrecord.com

Subject: [EXTERNAL] BackPage trial - POST VERDICT handout for jurors

Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 10:27:15 AM

Attachments: Your experience as a juror - VERSION 3.pdf

Several members of the media will attempt to communicate with jurors - after the judge

discharges them - outside of the court building. 

I have alerted court security and provided a copy of the handout (attached here, also)

--

-------

David M Morgan, Publisher 

Capitol Times Interview - Q&A (15min video)

member of IRE - Investigative Reporters & Editors

SJP (Arizona) 2023 Awardee - Order of the Silver Key Society

25-plus years of notable journalism

Twitter @dmmCCR 

U.S. Cell/Text 520-236-4051 Mexico 52-633-112-6458 

use Signal and/or WhatsApp for encrypted voice, text, file transfers

Sign up for FREE local News Alerts (14,585 people get it, do you?)

the COCHISE COUNTY RECORD - Serious Local News

based next to the historic Cochise County courthouse at Bisbee, ARIZONA

More than 15,200 folks discuss the local news on FaceBook at Cochise County Courts, Crime, Justice,

Jail Reports & Politics

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1975-1 Filed 11/16/23 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15960]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Notice of Withdrawal of the Waimanu Valley National Estuarine 
Research Reserve From the National Estuarine Research Reserve System

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Waimanu Valley National 
Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR) is withdrawn from the NERR System, 
established by section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, 
as amended. The Waimanu Valley NERR, located on the windward side of 
the Island of Hawaii, was designated in 1978 as the second NERR in the 
system. Serious budget cuts within the State have hindered efforts to 
adequately staff the Waimanu Valley NERR and complete a site management 
plan, which are required by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA) to be in compliance with regulations governing 
the NERR System. In addition, the remoteness and relative 
inaccessibility of the Waimanu Valley NERR, and the inability of the 
State of Hawaii to secure adequate protection of 200 acres of property 
in the WVNERR due to ownership by the Department of Hawaiian Homelands, 
renders the Waimanu Valley NERR unable to meet the research, education, 
and management purposes of the NERR System. After much effort to seek 
alternatives to withdrawal from the NERR System, both the State of 
Hawaii and NOAA agree that the only feasible solution at this time is 
to withdraw the Waimanu Valley NERR from the NERR System.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nina Garfield, NOAA/NOS/OCRM/SRD, 1305 East-West Highway, SSMC4 12th 
Floor, Silver Spring, MD. 20910; Phone (301) 713-3141, ext. 171.

Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.420 (Coastal Zone 
Management) Estuarine Sanctuaries.

    Dated: June 12, 1996.
David L. Evans
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal 
Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 96-15960 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
EXHIBIT
12.1 
  RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS
   The
following table sets forth our consolidated ratios:
  Six
      Months Ended June 30, 2009
                                      (2)
                                    
                                    Six
      Months Ended June 30, 2008
                                      (2)Ratio
      of Earnings to Fixed Charges (1)
                                    44.49
                                    
                                    5.00
  (1) The ratio of
earnings to fixed charges was determined by dividing consolidated earnings by
total fixed charges. For purposes of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges (i)
earnings consist of consolidated net income before considering income taxes,
minority interest and fixed charges and (ii) fixed charges consist of interest
on indebtedness, interest expense on funds withheld from reinsurers and that
portion of rent expense that is deemed by our management to be an appropriate
interest factor. We have estimated that one-third of rent expense represents a
reasonable approximation of the interest factor.
  (2) No preferred
shares were outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2009, and no preferred share dividends were paid during those
periods.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ John J.      Lennon |
|-------------------------|
|                    |   |
| Name:                   | John J.    Lennon |
| Title:                  | President, Chief Financial Officer      and Chairman of the Board |
|                    | (Principal Executive      Officer) |
|                    |   |
| /s/ John J.      Lennon |
|                    |   |
| Name:                   | John J.    Lennon |
| Title:                  | President, Chief Financial Officer      and Chairman of the Board |
|                    | (Principal Financial      Officer |
|                    | and Principal Accounting      Officer) |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15940]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[UT-020-06-1430-00]


Pony Express Resource Area, UT; Resource Management Plan

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to amend a resource management plan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is preparing an 
Environmental Assessment (EA), to consider a proposed amendment to the 
Pony Express Resource Management Plan (RMP). The proposed amendment 
would consider alternatives for management of acquired lands in Tooele 
County.

DATES: The comment period for identification of issues for the proposed 
plan amendment will commence with the date of publication of this 
notice. Comments must be submitted on or before July 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Nelson, Realty Specialist, Bureau 
of Land Management, Salt Lake District, 2370 South 2300 West, Salt Lake 
City, UT 84119, telephone (801) 977-4355. Existing planning documents 
and information are available at the above address or telephone number. 
Comments on the proposed plan amendment should be sent to the above 
address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Salt Lake District, BLM, is proposing to 
amend the Pony Express RMP, to identify and analyze management 
prescriptions for lands in the Oquirrh Mountain Range that have been 
recently acquired by the BLM. An EA will be prepared to analyze the 
impacts of this proposal and alternatives. Public participation is 
being sought at this initial stage in the planning process to ensure 
the RMP amendment addresses all issues, problems and concerns from 
those interested in the management of lands within the Salt Lake 
District. Necessary amendments to the approved plan will keep the 
document current and viable.
Roger Zortman,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 96-15940 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
#### Roger G. BRIGGS, Sr., Respondent, v. John PETERSON and Peterson Farms, Inc., Appellants.

No. 78781.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

Nov. 19, 1996.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1996.

Tom B. Kretsinger, Jr., Timothy J. Flook, Liberty, for respondent.

Roy W. Brown, Bruce B. Brown, Kearney, for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Briggs was injured when he was struck by a tractor driven by Peterson. Suit was filed alleging assault, battery, and negligence. The suit also sought punitive damages. After hearing the evidence, a jury returned a unanimous verdict for $12,000 for actual damages and found that Briggs was entitled to punitive damages. After receiving evidence of the defendant’s net worth, the jury returned a verdict assessing $12,000 as punitive damages. Judgment was entered in accordance with the jury’s verdicts.

Finding no error of law and determining that an opinion would have no precedential value, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed by this memorandum decision. *Rule 84-16(b).*

All concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7815
ANTHONY HOLLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DON R. GUILLORY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-694) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing his42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 21

                   KSL RECREATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


KSL Claremont Resort, Inc.
KSL Desert Resorts, Inc.
KSL Florida Holdings, Inc.
KSL Florida Development Corporation
KSL Georgia Holdings, Inc.
KSL Golf Holdings, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Holdings, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Land, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Realty, Inc.
KSL Grand Traverse Resort, Inc.
KSL Grand Wailea Hospitality Corporation
KSL Grand Wailea Resort, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings I, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings II, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings III, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings IV, Inc.
KSL Hawaii Holdings V, Inc.
KSL Hotel Corp.
KSL La Quinta Corporation
KSL Lake Lanier, Inc.
KSL Lake Chabot, Inc.
KSL Real Estate Company
KSL Resorts Group, Inc.
KSL Silver Properties, Inc.
KSL Water Works, Inc.
Las Casitas Corporation
OFFICC OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXA!S 

AUSTIN 

HonorableAlex Jung 

county 1Sttomey 

Olllesple county 

ifreder:cksburg, Texas