alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.17 

 

DESCRIPTION OF ITC^DELTACOM, INC. ANNUAL BONUS PLAN 

 

ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains an annual bonus plan for the benefit of its corporate officers and certain other employees of theCompany and its subsidiaries. Bonuses are specified as a percentage of the employee’s annual base salary. Bonus percentages generally are set by job classification level within the Company, except that bonus percentages for the most seniorexecutive officers of the Company are established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. 

 

The Compensation Committee establishes annual target bonus awards based on the achievement of the financial and operating objectives set by theCompensation Committee for the Company. Typically, 100% of annual bonuses payable to senior executives under the business plan are tied to the Company’s achievement of revenue, EBITDA (cash flow) and capital budget targets. Bonuses for otherexecutives and employees are determined based on varying percentages of annual base salary, tied to individual and departmental performance. Company performance (measured against targets set for senior executives) plays a factor in determining allbonus awards. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to modify the foregoing percentage for senior executive officers as it deems appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15783]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Committee of Visitors; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for Computer and 
Information Science and Engineering; Committee of Visitors (1115).
    Date and Time: July 8, 1996--8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; July 9, 1996--
8:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 330, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact person: Jan Gatton, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Room 1145 Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
306-1910.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including examination of decisions on proposals, reviewer 
comments, and other privileged materials.
    Agenda: To provide oversight review for programs in the Division 
of Computer and Computation Research.
    Reason for closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
the Committee is reviewing proposal actions that will include 
privileged intellectual property and personal information that could 
harm individuals if they are disclosed. If discussions were open to 
the public, these matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act would be improperly 
disclosed.

    Dated: June 17, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-15783 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and2.
    
    that as of the date of this statement, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 March 12, 2008

Date
    
    /s/ William
J. Wagner
William
J. Wagner
President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 12, 2008

Date
    
    /s/ William
W. Harvey, Jr.
William
W. Harvey, Jr.
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23


                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-71525, 333-61223, 333-63889, and 333-48797) and
on Form S-8 (No. 333-37959 and 333-38137) of RCN Corporation of our report
dated March 8, 2000 relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 2000
NUMBER S 13

- 11

- 004 78

- CV

, 13

- 11

- 00508

- CV, & 13

- 11

- 00509

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

ROGELIO V. CASTELLANOS, Appellant,

v.

JOSE A. CASAS AND MARIA G. CASAS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THEIR

DECEASED CHILD, JAVIER CASAS, Appellee s

.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo Count y, Texas

.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Rogelio V. Castellanos, has appealed three separate orders issued by

the trial court in these three appellate causes. The parties have now filed an “A greed

M otion to D ismiss the A ppeal ” in each of these causes on grounds that the parties have2

reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. The parties request

that this Court dismiss the appeal s

.

The Court, having considered the documents on f ile and the “Agreed Motion to

Dismiss” in each cause, is of the opinion that the motion s should be and are GRANTED

.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The stay previously imposed by the Court in these causes

is LIFTED. T he appeal s are hereby DISMISSED. By ag reement, each party will bear

its own costs. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court

will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal s at the parties’

request, no motion s for rehearing will be entertai ned, and our mandate s will issue

forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

31st day of August , 2011.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer February 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

AO 435

AZ Form (Rev. )

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

APPEAL CRIMINAL

NON-APPEAL CIVIL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested )

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

TESTIMONY (

PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

OTHER ( )

VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

OPINION OF COURT

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

SENTENCING

BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

( heck all that apply ) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS

PAPER COPY

14 DAYS

7 DAYS

DAILY

HOURLY

REALTIME E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING , THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1447 Filed 01/05/22 Page 1 of 1
#### In re the Matter of J.L.M. and R.C.M., Plaintiffs, Barbara Jo MARRIOTT, Respondent, v. Ronald Lynn MARRIOTT, Appellant, Lynn Marriott and Judy Marriott, Intervenors.

No. WD 48280.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 31, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 2, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 20, 1994.

Jerold L. Drake, Grant City, for appellant.

Zel M. Fischer, Rockport, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and KENNEDY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Lynn Marriott appeals the trial court’s finding that he sexually abused his daughter in a child custody case pursuant to the Uniform Child Jurisdiction Act. The appeal is dismissed. Rule 84.16(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7606

ALONZO TURNER-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-98-748-JFM)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonzo Turner-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General,

Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo Turner-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner-Bey v. Corcoran, No. CA98-748-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 908 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 908

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 19, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2781) to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
Act to designate segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, as components of the 
National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill shall 
be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Annual Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of EDAP TMS S.A. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. 

 

 

| Dated: August 22, 2006 | /s/ Hugues de Bantel

  |
|------------------------|------------------------------|

Hugues de Bantel

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

| Dated: August 22, 2006 | /s/ Thierry Turbant

  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|

Thierry Turbant

Chief Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to EDAP TMS S.A. and will be retained by EDAP TMS S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
EXHIBIT 99.1



                                 SCE Funding LLC
                     Annual Summary of Monthly Certificates
                            Year Ending December 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Small
                                                        Residential              Commercial
                                                         Customers               Customers                Total
                                                        -----------           ----------                  -----
<S>                                                      <C>                  <C>                   <C>           
Kilowatt hours of electricity billed                     23,170,147,122       4,195,529,052         27,365,676,174
FTA Charged per kilowatt hour (Dec. 97 - Dec. 98)                 1.723(cent)         1.822(cent)              N/A
Billed FTA Charges                                         $399,221,635         $76,442,539           $475,664,174

Estimated FTA Payments                                     $397,225,527         $76,136,769           $473,362,296

Estimated Write-off                                          $1,996,108            $305,770             $2,301,878
Remittance Shortfall - increased payment                       $149,727             $19,985               $169,711
         to the Collection Account
Excess Remittance - reduced payment                            $122,914             $26,030               $148,944
         to the Collection Account
Net Write-off*                                               $2,022,921            $299,725             $2,322,646

FTA Payments estimated to have been                        $379,507,498         $72,735,415           $452,242,913
         received by the Servicer
Remittance Shortfall - increased payment                       $149,727             $19,985               $169,711
         to the Collection Account
Excess Remittance - reduced payment                            $122,914             $26,030               $148,944
         to the Collection Account
Aggregate Remittance to Collection Account                 $379,534,311         $72,729,369           $452,263,680

</TABLE>


* Write-offs for months June through December are estimated at 0.5%
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Unknown Party named as Jane V., et al., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Motel 6 Operating LP, a limited 

partnership, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV18-0242 PHX DGC 

ORDER 

 

 The Court has been advised that this case has settled. Doc. 26. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

 1. This matter will, without further Order of this Court, be dismissed with 

prejudice on August 31, 2018 unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal 

date. 

 2. All pending hearings and deadlines are vacated. 

 3. All pending motions are found to be moot. 

 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this matter on August 31, 2018 without 

further leave of Court if a stipulation to dismiss is not filed prior to this date. 

 Dated this 6th day of July, 2018. 

 

Case 2:18-cv-00242-DGC Document 28 Filed 07/06/18 Page 1 of 1
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 881 

Recognizing the citizens of Wills Point for commemorating 100th anniversary 

of President William Taft’s 1909 campaign stop and preserving the 

city’s history for future generations of Texans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. HENSARLING submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the citizens of Wills Point for commemorating 

100th anniversary of President William Taft’s 1909 campaign stop and preserving the city’s history for future 

generations of Texans. 

Whereas Wills Point, Texas, located in historic Van Zandt 

County, whose village proper was formed by and named 

for William Wills; 

Whereas the Texas and Pacific Railroad, upon completion in 

1873, attracted businesses from nearby communities to 

relocate to Wills Point; 

Whereas Wills Point became the first Van Zandt County 

community to incorporate in 1884, making 2009 the 

125th anniversary of its incorporation; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 881 IH 

Whereas 100 years ago, President William H. Taft traveled 

by train across East Texas and made a whistle stop in 

Wills Point; and 

Whereas the City of Wills Point will hold a special re-enactment and celebration of the 100th anniversary of President Taft’s 1909 visit on October 31, 2009: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the citizens of Wills Point for 

3 commemorating 100th anniversary of President Wil4 liam Taft’s 1909 campaign stop and preserving the 

5 city’s history for future generations of Texans; 

6 (2) acknowledges the tireless work and dedica7 tion of Mayor Scott McGriff and City Manager Jim 

8 Stephens for making this celebration a success; and 

9 (3) recognizes Wills Point city council members, 

10 officials, and historians who have worked to support 

11 this memorable occasion. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOUGLAS EATON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3708 & 4D16-4148

[February 1, 2018]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial 

Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 13-

13035 CF10A and 16000586 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. 

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Michael Charles ERMATINGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56094.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 5, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 11, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 13, 1990.

Stormy B. White, Asst. Public Defender, Clayton, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Michael Ermatinger, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).