alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-DJH-2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

James Larkin,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-DJH-2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

BIENERT KATZMAN LITTRELL 

WILLIAMS LLP’S MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW AS RETAINED 

COUNSEL

Upon Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP’s (“BKLW”) Motion to Withdraw as Retained 

Counsel (“Motion”), with good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that BKLW’s Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Thomas H. Bienert, Jr., Whitney Z. Bernstein, and 

Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP are no longer counsel of record for Defendant James Larkin 

in this matter.

SO ORDERED this ________day of ___________, 2022.

_________________________

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1488-2 Filed 10/30/22 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Defendant Padilla’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time 

for Filing Responses to the Government’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel (Doc. 130), in 

which he requests an extension of time for all Defendants to respond to the Government’s 

Motion to Disqualify Counsel (Doc. 118), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to extend time (Doc. 130) is GRANTED. The 

deadline for all Defendants to respond to Government’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel 

(Doc. 118) is extended to and including May 23, 2018. 

 Dated this 3rd day of May, 2018. 

 

 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 134 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 1
#### City of Mansfield *v.*Endly.

(No. 22867

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*Mr. Gilbert Betiman,*attorney general, *Mr. William F. Black,*city solicitor, *Mr. Oscar Brown*and *Mr. Charles F. Ohl,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George FL. Blecker*and *Mr. Van C. Cook,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed upon the authority of *City of Elyria*v. *Vandemark,*100 Ohio St., 365.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C., J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,384
<SECURITIES>                                     9,923
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (101)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,490
<PP&E>                                          28,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,744)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,192
<BONDS>                                          4,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,356
<SALES>                                         49,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,360
<CGS>                                           32,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    52
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (825)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (414)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       486
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 Exhibit 10.34.2


                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                                 SHELDAHL, INC.
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


         THIS INSTRUMENT, amending the Sheldahl, Inc. Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan, is made and entered into by Sheldahl, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, and shall be effective as of September 16, 1998.

                                    AMENDMENT

         1. Section 5.1 is hereby amended to read as follows:

                  5.1 The Participant shall receive a distribution of cash equal
         to the then-current value of the Participant's account in the time and
         manner as the Participant specifies, in accordance with Sections 5.2
         and 5.3 of this Plan. Such election, once made, may be changed
         periodically by the Participant, provided that no election shall be
         changed subsequent to the Participant's termination of employment or
         directorship, and any election change made during the calendar year
         shall be effective only as to distributions that are made or begin in
         the following calendar year, and before the distribution becomes fully
         ascertainable in amount.


         2. Section 5.3 is hereby amended to read as follows:

                  5.3 A Participant may elect to have the amount deferred each
         year distributed at such time as provided below:

                  (a)   in the year following the Participant's termination of
                        employment or directorship with Sheldahl;

                  (b)   in the year in which the fifth anniversary of the
                        Participant's termination of employment or directorship
                        occurs; or

                  (c)   in the year or years following the calendar year for
                        which an election of Deferred Compensation has been made
                        by the Participant.

         3. Except as otherwise provided above, the provisions of the Sheldahl,
Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of Sheldahl, Inc. has
authorized its officer to execute this amendment, to be effective as of the date
first above written.

                                                     SHELDAHL, INC.


                                       By
                                         ---------------------------------------

                                       Its
                                          --------------------------------------
#### Armstrong et al. *v.*Douglas.

(No. 22744

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*651
      *Messrs. Young & Young,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Henry Hart,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the ground that compensation in damages is adequate upon the facts presented in the record.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15300]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Docket No. C-3655]


Amoco Oil Company; Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order requires, among other things, the 
Chicago-based corporation to possess competent and reliable scientific 
evidence to substantiate claims regarding the environmental benefits, 
engine performance, power, acceleration, or engine cleaning ability of 
any gasoline.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May 7, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joel Winston, FTC/S-4002, Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3153.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, February 29, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 7793, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Amoco Oil Company, for the 
purpose of soliciting public comment.
    Interested parties were given sixty (60) days in which to submit 
comments, suggestions or objections regarding the proposed form of the 
order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered on order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15300 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








EXHIBIT
      32.1





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL ADVANCE CORP. (the “Company”) On
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Oren Rozenberg,
      President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





i. The
      certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) or Rule
      15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).





ii.A
      certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
      purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
      liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
      incorporates it by reference.







/s/
      Oren Rozenberg


Oren
      Rozenberg


President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




15
1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Strouse, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

 v.

Unknown Madrid, et al.,

 Defendants.

CASE NO:

CV−18−00111−TUC−RCC (PSOT)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT

 On February 28, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint which has been assigned

the case number listed above. This case has been assigned to District Court

Judge Raner C Collins and the Court's Legal Staff. When any action is

taken in this case, you will be notified by Court order.

 DATED this 28th day of February, 2018.

s/Brian D. Karth

Brian D. Karth

District Court Executive/Clerk

cc: Plaintiff

Case 4:18-cv-00111-RCC-PSOT Document 4 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WARNING!

Failure to comply with the following rules will result in your document being STRICKEN

and/or your case being DISMISSED:

(1) You must file a Notice of Change of Address if your address changes.

(2) You must correctly label any further documents with the above assigned

 caption and case numbers. LRCiv 7.1(a).

(3) You must sign your name and date every document you file. FED. R. CIV. P. 11.

(4) If applicable, you must provide an original and one copy of any document to

 be filed. If you request a conformed copy, you must provide an original

 and two (2) copies. LRCiv 5.4. This does not apply to prisoner e−filers.

(5) If applicable, you must mail copies of every document you file to all respondents.

 or their attorneys, FED. R. CIV. P. 5(a), and every document you file

 must include a certificate stating the date a copy of the document was mailed

 to respondents or their attorneys. This does not apply to prisoner e−filers.

(6) The documents you file must not include personal identifiers. FED. R. CIV. P. 5.2.

Case 4:18-cv-00111-RCC-PSOT Document 4 Filed 02/28/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Joe F Dickson, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 13, 2010   /s/ Joe F. Dickson Joe F. Dickson Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 2 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2009.
    Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of the House of 
Representatives has assembled; that Nancy Pelosi, a Representative from the 
State of California, has been elected Speaker; and Lorraine C. Miller, a citizen 
of the State of Texas, has been elected Clerk of the House of Representatives of 
the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William UusiheimalaPrincipal
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      11, 2009
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Amber Hill, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, I, Julia J. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  August 20, 2007 AMBER HILL, INC. By: /s/ Julia J. Alexander Julia J. Alexander  {A0040284.DOC}  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Amber Hill, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, I, Hilary L. Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  August 20, 2007 AMBER HILL, INC. By: /s/ Hilary L. Davis Hilary L. Davis    {A0040284.DOC}
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 830 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 830

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 15, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2442) to amend the Reclamation Wastewater 
and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to expand the Bay Area Regional Water 
Recycling Program, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00310-DJH Document 17 Filed 05/31/18 Page 9 of 9
#### Ex parte Antonio Arthur HERNANDEZ.

No. 71589.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Jan. 27, 1993.

*914Antonio Arthur Hernandez, pro se.

Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was submitted to this Court by the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. *Ex parte Young,*418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.Cr.App.1967).

The applicant pleaded guilty to murder in Cause Number 16,964 in the 23rd Judicial District Court of Brazoria County, committed while applicant was incarcerated in the Texas Department of Corrections.1 Punishment was assessed at confinement for ten years. No direct appeal was taken.

In his present application, Applicant contends he is being denied jail credits. Specifically, Applicant contends a detainer out of Brazoria County was placed on him on December 5, 1985, and that he should have begun receiving flat time credit since that date. See *Ex Parte Bynum,*772 S.W.2d 113 (Tex.Cr.App.1989). However, Applicant’s judgment and sentence reflect he only received time credit from the date of indictment, February 5, 1986.

In order to determine whether in fact there was a detainer placed against Applicant and to determine whether Applicant is being denied flat time credit to which he is otherwise entitled, this Court remanded the application to the trial court. We ordered the trial court to order necessary affidavits and documents and to file findings of fact and conclusions of law which would assist in our determination of the merits of Applicant’s claim.

Records from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID) show that on December 11, 1985, the Brazoria County Sheriff filed a detainer in Cause No. 16,846. Although the records division at TDCJ-ID does not show a resulting conviction connected to this cause number, certified documents accompanying the writ application indicate the Applicant was reindicted for the same offense under a new Cause No. 16,964, upon which he was eventually convicted and sentenced. It is well-settled that an individual is entitled to all time “spent in jail in said cause.” Article 42.03, § 2, Y.A.C.C.P. See also, *Ex Parte Bynum, supra.*The records in this case support Applicant’s contention, and he is entitled to relief. Applicant is entitled to all time spent in jail on this cause, whether it was spent under Cause Number 16,846, or time spent under the new Cause Number 16,964. Therefore, Applicant is entitled to receive jail credit not previously credited for time served on this cause from December 11, 1985, until February 5, 1986.

Copies of this opinion will be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.

1

. Now the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.