alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harper Eugene ALLISON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66640.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 28, 1995.

Steven J. Harris, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Harper Eugene Allison, Jr., appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County denying his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Victor Manuel Ayala-Flores, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-8058-PCT-SPL 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of detention 

was addressed at a hearing on July 24, 2018. The Court was informed that the defendant 

is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time. 

 The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to 

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such 

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to 

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The 

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court 

proceeding. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of 

this detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion 

for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third 

party custodian. 

 Dated this 26th day of July, 2018.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133021 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133021 COA: 270705 Wayne CC: 01-003496-01 JOHNATHAN WEBB, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of American Water Star, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period endedDecember 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger Mohlman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Roger Mohlman                                               			

Roger Mohlman, Chief Executive Officer and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Principal Accounting Officer |
|--------|------------------------------|

|   | August 9, 2007 |
|--------|----------------|
Case 4:18-cr-00261-CKJ-LAB Document 48 Filed 03/20/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00261-CKJ-LAB Document 48 Filed 03/20/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00261-CKJ-LAB Document 48 Filed 03/20/19 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jun Wang,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 10, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Jun WangJun
      WangChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARIZONA

United States of America

Michael Lacey, et al. 18-CR-00422 SPL

Daniel Hyer

K.C. Maxwell 214701

Browne George Ross LLP

MAXWELL LAW, PC

899 ELLIS STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109

(415) 494-8887

kcm@kcmaxlaw.com

5/17/2018

5/17/2018

5/31/2018

Brown George Ross LLP

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 170 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1218-3 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1218-3 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1218-3 Filed 08/16/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1218-3 Filed 08/16/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1218-3 Filed 08/16/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1218-3 Filed 08/16/21 Page 6 of 6
6226883v1(67483.1)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lindsay G. Leavitt – 029110 

Lleavitt@jsslaw.com 

JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. 

A Professional Limited Liability Company 

One East Washington Street 

Suite 1900 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2554 

Telephone: (602) 262-5911 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum,

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Tempe Town Lake Inn, LLC, 

Defendant.

No. 2:18-cv-00697-DLR

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

WITH PREJUDICE 

 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum and Defendant Tempe Town Lake Inn, LLC, by 

and through its counsel undersigned, hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss with 

prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in this action, with each 

party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 27th day of September, 2018. 

JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. 

By: s/ Lindsay G. Leavitt 

Lindsay G. Leavitt 

One East Washington Street, Suite 1900 

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2554 

Defendant 

FERNANDO GASTELUM 

By: s/ Fernando Gastelum w/ permission from 

Fernando Gastelum 

209 West 9th Street 

Casa Grande, AZ 85122 

Pro Per 

Case 2:18-cv-00697-DLR Document 26 Filed 09/27/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

6226883v1(67483.1)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 27, 2018, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing 

and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF 

registrants: 

 I hereby certify that on September 27, 2018, I served the attached document 

by mail on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF 

System: 

Fernando Gastelum 

209 West 9th Street 

Casa Grande, AZ 85122 

Nando0526@msn.com

Pro Se 

Peter Kristofer Strojnik 

strojnik@skplaw.com

THE STROJNIK FIRM LLC 

Esplanade Center III 

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

 s/ Tana Davis-Digeno 

Case 2:18-cv-00697-DLR Document 26 Filed 09/27/18 Page 2 of 2
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| /s/      Richard A. Robert                                                                                             |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard      A. Robert                                                                                                 |   |
| Executive      Vice President andChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) May      11, 2009 |   |

|   |   |
|--------|--------|
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Asia Document Transition, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 29, 2010





/s/
      Bernard ChanBernard
      ChanPrincipal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided toASIA
DOCUMENT TRANSITION,
INC. and will be retained byASIA
DOCUMENT TRANSITION,
INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### David W. RHODES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66708.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 16, 1995.

Kathleen G. Henry, Lewis Green, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David Rhodes, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion by the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
H. Res. 897 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 2, 2009. 

Whereas veterans have made innumerable sacrifices for the 

freedom and welfare of the United States and people 

worldwide; 

Whereas in 2008 there were over 23,000,000 veterans in the 

United States, but many elementary and secondary 

school students are not aware of the efforts veterans have 

made to protect our freedoms; 

Whereas many elementary and secondary schools and teachers have held drives in recent years to collect items to 

send to veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and 

families of such members; 

Whereas fewer than half of the Nation’s high school seniors 

have a basic knowledge of American history and the contributions veterans have made to the Nation’s safety and 

security; 

Whereas it is important for elementary and secondary school 

students to learn about the history of the Nation and the 

wars and missions veterans have participated in and sacrificed for; and 

Whereas elementary and secondary schools across the Nation 

host Veterans Day programs to honor and educate stu-
2 

•HRES 897 EH 

dents about the sacrifices veterans have made: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the importance of teaching elementary and secondary school students, on Veterans Day 

and throughout the school year, about the sacrifices that 

veterans have made throughout the history of the Nation; and 

(2) encourages elementary and secondary schools to 

engage students in learning about, and honoring, veterans and the sacrifices they have made. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of XenaCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: August 19, 2008



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Bobby Story        
| | Bobby Story            
| | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Elgood, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Transglobal Mining Corp;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  August 4, 2007





Transglobal Mining Corp.





By:

/s/Scott Elgood



Scott Elgood, President

(Principal Executive Officer, and

Principal Financial Officer
1 

### NUMBER 13 - 17 - 00700 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Theodore Smith , Appellant ,
v. The State of Texas , Appellee.

On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County , Texas. 

## O R D E R
Before Justic es Rod riguez, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Theodore Smith, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number 17FC

- 1908

- B

. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The2

purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non

appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time an d expense associated with non

appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State , 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Within thirty days of date of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Grant Jones , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to a ppeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, identif ying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614

– 15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State , 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any fact ual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 614

– 15; c f. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of ap peal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting3

appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1,
10.2. PER CURIAM Do n ot publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b). Delivered and filed the 21st day of December 2017

.
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunovia Energy Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arthur Buckland, Chief Executive Officer and I, Matthew Veal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





December 20, 2010
/s/Arthur BucklandArthur BucklandChief Executive Officer





December 20, 2010
/s/Matthew VealMatthew VealChief Financial Officer