alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BKLW’S NOTICE RE DEFENDANT JAMES LARKIN’S RETENTION OF NEW COUNSEL

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. (CA Bar No.135311, admitted pro hac vice)

Whitney Z. Bernstein (CA Bar No. 304917, admitted pro hac vice)

BIENERT KATZMAN LITTRELL WILLIAMS LLP

903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350

San Clemente, California 92673

Telephone: (949) 369-3700

Facsimile: (949) 369-3701

tbienert@bklwlaw.com

wbernstein@bklwlaw.com

Attorneys Discharged by James Larkin

Motion to Withdraw Pending

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-DJH

BIENERT KATZMAN LITTRELL 

WILLIAMS LLP’S NOTICE RE 

DEFENDANT JAMES LARKIN’S 

RETENTION OF NEW COUNSEL

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1505 Filed 12/06/22 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 BKLW’S NOTICE RE DEFENDANT JAMES LARKIN’S RETENTION OF NEW COUNSEL

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr., Whitney Z. Bernstein, and Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP 

(collectively, “BKLW”) have been terminated as counsel for defendant James Larkin and have a 

motion pending to withdraw as counsel. The Court in its order at Docket 1504 directed Mr. Larkin 

to have new counsel file a Notice of Appearance by December 6, 2022. 

Defendant James Larkin hereby provides an update regarding the status of his retaining 

new counsel to represent him in the instant matter. This update is based on the attached declaration 

of James Larkin and the files and records in this case. See attached declaration as Exhibit A. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of December 2022, 

BIENERT KATZMAN LITTRELL 

WILLIAMS LLP

s/ Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. 

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. 

Whitney Z. Bernstein 

Attorneys Discharged By James Larkin

Motion to Withdraw Pending

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1505 Filed 12/06/22 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 BKLW’S NOTICE RE DEFENDANT JAMES LARKIN’S RETENTION OF NEW COUNSEL

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on December 6, 2022, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice 

of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance as counsel of 

record. 

/s/ Toni Thomas 

Toni Thomas

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1505 Filed 12/06/22 Page 3 of 3
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50224 Conference Calendar

__________________ ENRIQUE SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus EDIE RUBALCABA ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. CA-EP-92-263

- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Enrique Sanchez appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his civil rights action against Edie Rubalcaba, the El Paso County District Clerk, for failure to state a claim and granting summary judgment in favor of Maria Chavez, the official court reporter for the 168th Judicial District Court in El Paso County. Sanchez has raised nine issues on appeal, which weNo. 95-50224 -2- liberally construe as a challenge to the district court's analysis and basis for the decision. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Even if all of Sanchez's allegations against Rubalcaba are taken as true, Rubalcaba's conduct was an integral part of the judicial process, and she enjoys absolute immunity for her quasi-judicial acts. As to Chavez, Sanchez has not alleged that she violated a clearly established right. Chavez was not the court reporter at Sanchez's trial; therefore, there is an absence of a genuine issue of material fact, and Chavez is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We caution Sanchez that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Sanchez is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 13.1











CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
China Southern Airlines Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tan Wan Geng, President of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











|Date: April
    28, 2016 | By:                | /s/Tan
Wan Geng
|------------------------ | ------------------ | ---------------
|                         | Name: Tan Wan Geng
|                         | Title: President  





* This certification accompanies the Report
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 of Silverstar Mining Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    | Silverstar Mining Corp.
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    |                        
|Dated: May 20, 2013 | By:                    
|                    |                        
|                    |                        



|Dated: May 20, 2013 | By: | /s/ Jared Robinson     
|------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                    |     | Jared Robinson         
|                    |     | Chief Financial Officer



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Silverstar Mining Corp. and will be retained by Silverstar Mining Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry JOHNSON, Appellant.

No. 65840.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 28, 1995.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Larry Johnson, appeals from convictions in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis in three consolidated cases of the Class A felonies of robbery in the first degree, RSMo § 569.020 (1986), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1986), for which appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to six consecutive life terms of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc.
      ("the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
      Zahir Teja, Chairman of the Board and Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully
      comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
      /s/Zahir Teja____________________


Zahir
      Teja, President and CEO





Dated:
      August 24, 2007
| NAME      OF COMPANY                                                         |   | JURISDICTION      OF INCORPORATION |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Shantou      Airlines Company Limited                                        |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Zhuhai      Airlines Company Limited                                         |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Xiamen      Airlines Company Limited                                         |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Guizhou      Airlines Company Limited                                        |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Chongqing      Airlines Company Limited                                      |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Guangzhou      Nanland  Air Catering Company Limited               |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| China      Southern West  Australian Flying College Pty    Limited |   | Australia                          |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Guangzhou      Baiyun International Logistics Company Limited                |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Xinjiang      Civil Aviation Property Management Limited                     |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| China      Southern Airlines Group Air Catering Company Limited              |   | PRC                                |
|                                                                         |   |                               |
| Nan      Lung International Freight Company Limited                          |   | Hong      Kong                     |
|                                                                    |   |                               |
| Beijing      Southern Airlines Ground Service Company Limited                |   | PRC                                |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on

Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and

Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Billy C. Duvall,

Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009                    
|                                        
|/s/ Billy C. Duvall                     
|Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Florham Consulting Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kellis Veach, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Florham Consulting
Corp. and will be retained by Florham Consulting Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






/s/  Kellis
      VeachKellis
      VeachChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)




August
13, 2010
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Defendant/Appellant. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 61068, 63360.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 12, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 10, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 21, 1993.

Henry B. Robertson, St. Louis, for defen-danVappellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of two counts of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986, and one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.-020, RSMo Supp.1992. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.31
TRIPATH IMAGING, INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AT MARCH 31, 2005
On January 26, 2005, the Compensation Committee approved a director compensation package fornon-management directors who beneficially own less than 3% of the Company’s outstanding commonstock, to be effective January 1, 2005. The chairs of the Company’s Audit Committee, CompensationCommittee and Nominating and Governance Committee will receive an annual fee of $5,000, payablequarterly, for service as committee chair. Non-management directors will receive $15,000 per yearfor service as a director, payable quarterly, plus a per board meeting fee of $2,500 and a percommittee meeting fee of $1,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in connectionwith attending or otherwise participating in meetings of the directors and committees of the board.
In addition, non-management directors who beneficially own less than 3% of the Company’soutstanding common stock receive compensation for their service on the board pursuant to theCompany’s 1997 Director Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors may by resolution determine thatany otherwise eligible director shall not receive grants of stock options under the 1997 DirectorPlan. Each time an Eligible Director is elected or re-elected, such director will be grantedautomatically an option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock. Such options becomeexercisable in thirty-six (36) equal monthly installments on the last day of each month, if andonly if the director is still serving on the Company’s Board of Directors at the opening ofbusiness on that day. Each option has a term of ten years. The exercise price for each option isequal to the last reported sales price for the Company’s common stock on the business dayimmediately preceding the date of grant, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market. The exerciseprice may be paid in cash, shares of common stock or a combination of both.
#### William Everett DEAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 619-95.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Sept. 11, 1996.

Robert P. Abbott, Coppell, for appellant.

Anne B. Wetherholt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Matthew Paul, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted after a bench trial of possession of cocaine. Appellant pled true to two enhancement paragraphs and the court sentenced him to twenty-five years confinement. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial after finding that an exhibit had been omitted from the record through no fault of appellant and that the exhibit could not be located. *Dean v. State,*900 S.W.2d 367 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1995). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether reversal is required when an exhibit not necessary for the resolution of any issue raised by appellant is missing from the record on appeal.

After careful consideration of the record in this ease, we find that the State’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the State’s petition is dismissed.

WHITE, J., not participating.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 25, 2013

s0122 

# Order

January 25, 2013

145832

HORSESHOE LAKE CORPORATION, ERIC

GREGG, BARBARA GREGG, DENNIS LIWOSZ,

WILLIAM WAGNER, and JEFFREY SOUZA,

Plaintiffs/Counter

- Defendants

- Appellees,

v SC: 145832

COA: 304695

Washtenaw CC: 10

- 000513

- CH

PAUL R. CARLSON and SUSAN K. CARLSON,

Defendants/Counter

- Plaintiffs

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 350), the undersigned, Alan Xenakis, Chief Executive Officer of XenaCare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report").



The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 3rd day of July 2007.



| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | ------------------------------
| |  |  | XENACARE HOLDINGS, INC.       
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | /s/ Alan Xenakis              
| |  |  | Name: Alan Xenakis            
| |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

CARL DANIELS LOVE, JR., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 307 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 14 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 14 Filed 04/06/18 Page 2 of 2