alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Novel Denim Holdings Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, K.C. Chao, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/      K.C. CHAO
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:    K.C. Chao
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                              President

                                       Date:    September 25, 2002

                                                                             167


<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Novel Denim Holdings Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alain Rey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/      ALAIN REY
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Alain Rey
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer

                                       Date:  September 25, 2002



                                                                             168
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15586]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Cancellation of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board meeting previously 
scheduled for Thursday, June 20, 1996, is hereby cancelled. The next 
meeting will be held on Thursday, July 25, 1996, for which due notice 
will be given.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald S. Young, Executive Staff Director, 750 First St., N.E., Room 
1001, Washington, D.C. 20002, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    Dated: June 14, 1996.
Ronald S. Young,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 96-15586 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
#### Sylvestre GALLARDO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 582-91.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

March 31, 1993.

Bryan P. Cartall, San Antonio, for appellant.

Steven C. Hilbig, Dist. Atty. and Edward F. Shaughnessy, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. *Gallardo v. State,*809 S.W.2d 540 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1991). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to review the Court of Appeals’ holding that Article 37.-07(3)(a), V.A.C.C.P., as amended, allows admission of unadjudicated extraneous offenses in the punishment phase of trial in a non-capital offense.

Recently this Court decided in *Grunsfeld v. State,*843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), that evidence of extraneous offenses is not admissible at the punishment phase of trial in a non-capital offense unless it satisfies the definition of “prior criminal record” under Art. 37.07(3)(a). Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for reconsideration in light of our opinion in *Grunsfeld,*supra.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30865-30866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15358]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-272-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

June 12, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 7, 1996, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets 
proposed to be effective July 7, 1996:

First Revised Sheet No. 108
Second Revised Sheet No. 123
First Revised Sheet No. 131
Third Revised Sheet No. 139
Third Revised Sheet No. 140
Second Revised Sheet No. 146
Third Revised Sheet No. 147
Second Revised Sheet No. 252
First Revised Sheet No. 261
Third Revised Sheet No. 287
First Revised Sheet No. 299

    Northern states that the above sheets are being filed to give 
Northern the ability to negotiate rates as contemplated by the 
Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-
Service Ratemaking Methodologies, issued January 31, 1996.

[[Page 30866]]

    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make Protestant a party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15358 Filed 6-17-96, 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Michael TILLMAN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

No. 55305.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 6, 1989.

John A. Klosterman, Columbia, for mov-ant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Cornelius Evan Manakaja,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-08038-001-PCT-DMF

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived and the detention hearing was submitted on the record. The Court 

finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised 

probation as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), 

that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight 

risk or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised probation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as flight risk and 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 7th day of June, 2018.

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 799 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 118
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 799

                          [Report No. 111-287]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2997) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
 programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2009

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2997) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
 programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2997) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food 
and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
conference report to its adoption without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
                                                 House Calendar No. 118

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 799

                          [Report No. 111-287]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2997) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
 programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 6, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY McCLELLAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

S. LOZANO, Parole Agent - CDCR; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-15149 

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00386-LJO-MJS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Michael J. Seng, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted August 9, 2017***

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Gregory McClellan appeals pro se from the magistrate judge’s January 15, 

2016 order denying McClellan in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status in his 42 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** McClellan consented in writing to proceed before a magistrate judge. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Defendants’ consent is inferred from their conduct during 

litigation. See Roell v. Withrow, 538 U.S. 580, 590 (2003). 

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 15 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-15149 

§ 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. 

Washington v. L.A. Cty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, 833 F.3d 1048, 1054 (9th Cir. 2016). We 

affirm.

The magistrate judge properly denied IFP status because at the time 

McClellan brought this action, McClellan was a prisoner and had accumulated 

three strikes. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); O’Neal v. Price, 531 F.3d 1146, 1154 (9th 

Cir. 2008) (“Because § 1915(g) . . . does not distinguish between dismissals with 

and without prejudice, . . . a dismissal without prejudice may count as a strike.” 

(citation omitted)).

Defendants’ request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 25) is denied.

Defendants’ motions to strike evidence attached to the reply brief (Docket 

Entry Nos. 31 and 32) are granted. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CX2 Technologies., Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lester
Hahn, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Principal Executive, Financial and
Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of
and for the period covered by the Report.





Date:  June
21, 2010





/s/ Lester HahnLester
      Hahn, Chief Executive Officer, President,
                Principal
      Executive, Financial and Accounting
Officer
EXHIBIT 8,1
                                   -----------

                   LIST OF THE SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                   COUNTRY OF                  INTEREST
  SUBSIDIARY                     INCORPORATION                 OWNERSHIP
  ----------                     -------------                 ---------
  Europe-Visions A/S        (1)     Denmark           100,0% (Sold June 2, 2006)


------------------------------------
    (1)     Formerly known as Euro909Media A/S


        Other   significant    operating    subsidiaries    consolidated   under
Europe-Visions  A/S and their  jurisdiction of  incorporation  and our ownership
interest in those subsidiaries at December 31, 2005:

                                   COUNTRY OF                  INTEREST
  SUBSIDIARY                     INCORPORATION                 OWNERSHIP
  ----------                     -------------                 ---------

  Ciac A/S                          Denmark                      100,0%
  Prime Vision A/S                  Denmark                      100,0%
  Arhustudiet A/S                   Denmark                      100,0%
  Publishing & Management ApS       Denmark                       51,0%
  TV Akademiet A/S                  Denmark                      100,0%
  Formedia A/S                      Denmark                      100,0%
  Mobile Broadcasting A/S           Denmark                      100,0%
Case 4:18-cr-00261-CKJ-LAB Document 46 Filed 02/26/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:18-cr-00261-CKJ-LAB Document 46 Filed 02/26/19 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      28,655,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  991,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                    85,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,191,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,168,479
<PP&E>                                       2,526,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                 507,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,020,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,945,014
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       125,054
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,902,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,020,996
<SALES>                                      2,667,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,667,837
<CGS>                                        1,952,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,952,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,994,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                67,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,478,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,984,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (10,984,373)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (10,984,373)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.59)


</TABLE>
null

525.98486
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2214

MARION WILSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY; MICHAEL NESSELT; ANGELA WASHINGTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Gina Simms, Magistrate Judge. (8:18-cv-03707-GLS)

Submitted: January 31, 2022 Decided: February 7, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marion Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Pemble Hansen, Edward B. Lattner, John Paul 

Markovs, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2214 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Marion Wilson appeals the magistrate judge’s orders granting Defendants’ motion 

to dismiss Wilson’s civil action challenging the termination of his employment and 

denying Wilson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.

*

 We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. 

Wilson v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 8:18-cv-03707-GLS (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2020 & Nov. 10, 

2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge. 

28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2214 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/07/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey et al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages in its 

Response in Opposition to the Government’s Motion in Limine to Determine Admissibility of 

Evidence (Dkt. 931), and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Excess pages(Doc. 1001)is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ response shall not exceed 26 pages.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the lodged response be withdrawn and a response 

in compliance with this Order be filed no later than March 31, 2021.

Dated this 18th day of March, 2021.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1133 Filed 03/18/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ HASSAN CHAHADEHHassan ChahadehChairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive OfficerAugust 15, 2011/s/ MICHAEL L. GRIFFINMichael L. GriffinChief Financial OfficerAugust 15, 2011
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the quarterly report of Infolinx
Communications Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the fiscal period ending
August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick Fitzsimmons, Chief Accounting Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ PATRICK FITZSIMMONS

Name: PATRICK FITZSIMMONS Title: Chief Financial Officer
and Director October 18, 2007

---