alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          41,478
<SECURITIES>                                     4,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,843<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,809
<INVENTORY>                                      1,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,688
<PP&E>                                         240,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                  95,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 593,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,135
<BONDS>                                        131,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     341,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   593,650
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,706
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,994<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,297
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,143)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,250)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.37)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)<F2>
        
<FN>
<F1>Receivables and total costs have been restated to conform with the December 
1997 reporting format.
<F2>EPS has been restated to give effect to a two for one stock split payable in
the form of a 100% stock dividend, declared in March 1998 for stockholders of 
record on March 20, 1998, with a distribution date of April 3, 1998.
</FN> 

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 214 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER
I, John LaBoskey, certify that:
**1.** I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BEI Technologies,Inc.; **2.** Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; **3.** Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; **4.** The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
**(a)** Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; **(b)** Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and **(c)** Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
**5.** The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
**(a)** All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and **(b)** Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting
Dated December 16, 2004 /s/ John LaBoskey
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Volcan Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sholom Feldman, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |     |                                                       
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  January 5, 2009 | By: | /s/ Sholom Feldman                                    
|                       |     | Sholom Feldman                                        
|                       |     | Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 5, 2015  /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick C. Bartlett Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
of NTK Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to their
knowledge:





1.
            the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 4, 2009
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the fiscal quarter ended April 4, 2009 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Richard L.
Bready


Name: Richard L.
Bready


Title:    President
and Chief Executive Officer











/s/ Almon C.
Hall


Name:Almon C. Hall


Title:VicePresident and ChiefFinancialOfficer
Exhibit 12.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Liam Galin, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of RiT Technologies Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:





a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report; and





c.

disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





Date: June 30, 2004

BY: /S/ Liam Galin

Liam Galin

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Ellen K. BOEHM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64737.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Aug. 23, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 28, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 22, 1994.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie E. Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an ex*740tended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: James Agbeze v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00140-CR

Trial court case number: 1288928

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

The appellate record was due in this case on April 12, 2013. On May 1, 2013, the court 

reporter informed us that the reporter’s record has not been filed as a result of appellant’s failure 

to pay or make payment arrangements for preparation of the record. Appellant has now filed a 

“motion for extension of time to file court reporter’s record”, requesting an extension of time 

until June 30, 2013 to pay for the reporter’s record.

Appellant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Appellant is ordered to provide 

written evidence from the court reporter showing that appellant has either paid or made 

arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee no later than June 12, 2013. If appellant fails to provide 

said evidence by June 12, 2013, appellant’s brief will be due no later than July 12, 2013, and the 

Court may consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record 

for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c), 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3, 2013
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Matthew H. Green

Bar No. 020827

LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW H. GREEN

130 West Cushing Street

Tucson, AZ 85701

Telephone: (520) 882-8852

Facsimile: (520) 882-8843

Email: matt@arizonaimmigration.net

Attorney for Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case No. CR18-00353-RCC(BGM)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) MOTION TO CONTINUE

) PLEA DEADLINE AND 

MARCO ANTONIO DE LA GARZA, ) CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

)

Defendant. ) 4th Request by Defendant

)

 ) (Honorable Raner C. Collins)

It is expected that excludable delaypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F)may occur as a result

of this motion or from an order based thereon.

COMES NOW the Defendant, MARCO ANTONIO DE LA GARZA, by and through his

attorney undersigned, and hereby moves this Court for continuance of the Plea Deadline currently

scheduled for October 19, 2018, and Trial currently scheduled for November 6, 2018 for a period of

no less than thirty (30) days for the following reasons:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 (h)(8)(A), (B), the defendant requires additional

time to prepare for trial. Although the prosecutor and defense counsel are optimistic

that this case will be resolved by plea agreement, should this case proceed to trial

additional time will be required to prepare defendant’s case and to prepare the

defendant to testify. See 18 U.S.C Section 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv). 

2. Assistant United States Attorney, Heather Siegele, has been notified of this

continuance, and has no objection to the requested continuance.

Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 30 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This motion is made in good faith and not for the mere purpose of delay.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 15th day of October, 2018

 s/Matthew H. Green 

 Matthew H. Green

 Attorney for Defendant

Copy of the foregoing mailed 

electronically this date to:

Heather Siegele, Esq. 

Lori Price, Esq.

Assistant U. S. Attorney

405 W. Congress, STE 4800

Tucson, AZ 85701

2

Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 30 Filed 10/15/18 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                            SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE OF
                           ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY

<TABLE>
<S>                                                  <C>
                  COMMON STOCK                                                                     COMMON STOCK
                                                                                                   PAR VALUE $.01
NUMBER                                                                                                                        SHARES

------        INCORPORATED UNDER THE                                                                                          ------
           LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE


        THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN                                      CUSIP
        NEW YORK, NY AND RIDGEFIELD PARK, NJ                                     SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


                                                             [PICTURE]

                                                     ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY


                 This Certifies that






                 is the owner of

                                     FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF

                 Encore Acquisition Company (hereinafter called the "Corporation") transferable on the books of the
      Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
        endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.
            Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.



                           /s/ JON S. BRUMLEY

              Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

                                                                          DATED:

                                                                          COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
     /s/   JON S. BRUMLEY                    /s/  KYLE M. SCHULTZ              CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER SERVICES, L.L.C.
 Executive Vice President and Secretary     Executive Vice President
                                                                          BY                               TRANSFER AGENT
                                                                                                            AND REGISTRAR


     /s/   MORRIS B. SMITH                    /s/  GENE R. CARLSON
 Executive Vice President and Chief         Executive Vice President
         Financial Officer                                                                          AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
</TABLE>
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 144 Filed 12/12/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 144 Filed 12/12/18 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 144 Filed 12/12/18 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 144 Filed 12/12/18 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 144 Filed 12/12/18 Page 5 of 5
1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1737

___________ Phyllis E. Toston, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Missouri Division of Employment * Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 4, 2005 Filed: February 7, 2005

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Phyllis Toston appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this Title VII action Toston brought against her former employer, the Missouri Division of Employment Security. Following careful review, we agree with the district court that Toston presented nothing in support of her bare allegation that her employer’s legitimate reason for terminating her--poor performance--was a pretext for race discrimination, see Riggs v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist. , 385 F.3d 1164,-2- 1166 (8th Cir. 2004), or retaliation, seeGriffith v. City of Des Moines , 387 F.3d 733,738 (8th Cir. 2004). In addition, to the extent she pleaded a hostile-workenvironment claim, Toston failed to show harassment pervasive or severe enough to affect a term, condition, or privilege of her employment. See id. at 739. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acadia Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  July 3, 2007





/s/ James H. Donahue

James H. Donahue, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 1 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 2 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 3 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 4 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 5 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 6 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 7 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 8 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 9 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 10 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 11 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 12 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 13 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 14 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 15 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 16 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 17 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 18 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 19 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 20 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 21 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 22 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 23 of 24

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-4   Filed 06/05/18   Page 24 of 24