29762 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Notices

Blair County

Noble, J. L. School, 209 12th Ave., Juniata,

Altoona, 96000712

Cambria County

Patton Historic District, Roughly bounded by

5th, Beech, 6th, Palmer Aves. and Terra

Cotta St., Patton, 96000714

Franklin County

Oller, Joseph J., House, 138 W. Main St.,

Waynesboro, 96000707

Lancaster County

Nissly Swiss Chocolate Company, 951 Wood

St., Mount Joy, 96000709

Montgomery County

Kastner, Jacob, Loghouse, 416 Norristown

Rd., Lower Gwynedd Township, Spring

House, 96000708

Rittenhouse, David, Junior High School, 1705

Locust St., Norristown, 96000717

Philadelphia County

The Elverson Building, 400–440 N. Broad St.,

Philadelphia, 96000716

Sullivan County

Eagles Mere Historic District, Roughly

bounded by PA 42, Lakewood, LaPorte,

and Forest Aves., Shrewsbury Township,

Eagles Mere, 96000718

Susquehanna County

Susquehanna County Courthouse Complex,

Town Green, jct. of Public Ave. and Maple

St., Montrose, 96000706

Warren County

Woman’s Club of Warren, 310 Market St.,

Warren, 96000715

Washington County

Munce, Thomas, House, Rt. 136, 3 mi. E of

Washington, S. Strabane Township,

Washington vicinity, 96000710

TENNESSEE

Cumberland County

Wilson, Greenberry, House (Historic Family

Farms in Middle Tennessee MPS) E. G.

Wilson Rd., 7 mi. SE of Crossville, Burke

vicinity, 96000719

Rhea County

Broyles—Darwin House, 108 Idaho, Dayton,

96000720

UTAH

Davis County

Stewart, LeConte, House, 172 W. 100 South,

Kaysville, 96000721

WASHINGTON

Klickitat County

Rowland Basin Site, Address Restricted, Lyle

vicinity, 96000724

WISCONSIN

Calumet County

Timm, Herman C., House, 1600 Main St.,

New Holstein, 96000727

Kewaunee County

Kewaunee County Sheriff’s House and Jail,

Court House Sq., jct. of Dodge and Vliet

Sts., Kewaunee, 96000728

Outagamie County

Schuetter, Henry, House, 330 W. 6th St.,

Appleton, 96000725

Richland County

Bowen, Julia B. and Fred P., House, 220 E.

Union St., Richland Center, 96000729

Cunningham Lane Bridge, Hansberry Lane,

near Fancy Cr., Rockbridge, 96000731

Waukesha County

Castleman, Dr. Alfred L., House, 975 S.

Waterville Rd., Summit, 96000730

Moreland Boulevard Pump House and

Reservoir, 413 Moreland Blvd., Waukesha,

96000726

Waupaca County

Waupaca Free Public Library (Public Library

Facilities in Wisconsin MPS) 321 S. Main

St., Waupaca, 96000732

[FR Doc. 96–14808 Filed 6–11–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

International Criminal Investigative

Training Assistance Program; Notice

of Information Collection Under

Review

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) approval is being sought for the

information collection listed below.

This proposed information collection

was previously published in the Federal

Register and allowed 60 days for public

comments.

The purpose of this notice is to allow

an additional 30 days for public

comments from the data listed at the top

of this page in the Federal Register.

This process is conducted in accordance

with 5 Code of Federal Regulation, Part

1320.10.

Written comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

Office of Management and Budget,

Office of Regulatory Affairs, Attention:

Department of Justice Desk Officer,

Washington, DC, 20530. Additionally,

comments may be submitted to OMB via

facsimile to 202–395–7285. Comments

may also be submitted to the

Department of Justice (DOJ), Justice

Management Division, Information

Management and Security Staff,

Attention: Department Clearance

Officer, Suite 850, 1001 G Street, NW.,

Washington, DC., 20530. Additionally,

comments may be submitted to DOJ via

facsimile to 202–514–1534. Written

comments and suggestions from the

public and affected agencies should

address one or more of the following

points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency/component,

including whether the information will

have practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agencies/components estimate of the

burden of the proposed collection of

information, including the validity of

the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

information technology, e.g., permitting

electronic submission of responses.

The proposed collection is listed

below:

(1) Type of information collection.

New Collection.

(2) The title of the form/collection.

Organizational Study, Evaluation of the

ICITAP Qualification Statement.

(3) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection.

Form: None. International Criminal

Investigative Training Assistance

Program, Criminal Division, United

States Department of Justice.

(4) Affected public who will be asked

or required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract. Primary: Consists of

individuals associated with the law

enforcement community. Other: None.

The information collection form will

be used in a dual capacity as a

consultant application as well as a

device for data entry.

(5) An estimate of the total annual

number of respondents and the amounts

of time estimated for an average

respondent respond. Six hundred

responses at one hour or sixty minutes

per response.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection. Six hundred annual burden

hours.

Public comment on this proposed

information collection is strongly

encouraged.

Dated: June 7, 1996.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 96–14873 Filed 6–11–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–20–M
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Notices 29763

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Comprehensive

Environmental Response

Compensation and Recovery Liability

Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a proposed partial consent

decree in United States v. The Glidden

Company, et al., Civil Action No. 5:95

CV 1009, was lodged on May 31, 1996

with the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Ohio. This

proposed consent decree would resolve

the United States’ claims against The

Glidden Company, one of two

defendants in this case, for

unreimbursed past costs incurred at the

Bohaty Drum Site in Medina County,

Ohio, pursuant Section 107 of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation and Liability

Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607, in return for a

payment of $60,000.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed

consent decree. Comments should be

addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and

should refer to United States v. The

Glidden Company, et al., Civil Action

No. 5:95 CV 1009, and the Department

of Justice Reference No. 90–11–2–1108.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney, Northern District of

Ohio, 1800 Bank One Center, 600

Superior Avenue, East, Cleveland, Ohio,

44114–2600; the Region 5 Office of the

Environmental Protection Agency, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois, 60604–3590; and at the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202–

624–0892. A copy of the proposed

consent decree may be obtained in

person or by mail from the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In

requesting a copy, please refer to the

referenced case and enclose a check in

the amount of $4.25 (25 cents per page

reproduction costs), payable to the

Consent Decree Library.

Bruce S. Gelber,

Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 96–14789 Filed 6–11–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Clean Water Act

In accordance with Departmental

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a consent decree in United

States of America v. Rueth Builders,

Inc., Civ. No. 2:96–CV–66 (N.D. Ind.),

was lodged with the United States

District Court for the Northern District

of Indiana on March 8, 1996. The

proposed decree concerns alleged

violations of the Clean Water Act, 33

U.S.C. 1311, as a result of the discharge

of dredged and fill materials onto

approximately 0.40 acres of wetlands by

Rueth Buildings, Inc., in Dyer, Lake

County, Indiana.

The Consent Decree provides for the

payment of a $10,000.00 civil penalty to

the United States and permanently

enjoins Rueth Builders, Inc. from taking

any actions, or causing others to take

any actions, which result in the

discharge of dredged or fill material into

waters of the United States, as defined

by the Clean Water Act and regulations

promulgated thereunder, except as in

compliance with an individual permit

issued pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1344(a), or

with any applicable general permit

issued by the United States Army Corps

of Engineers.

The Department of Justice will receive

written comments relating to the

consent decree for a period of thirty (30)

days from the date of this notice.

Comments should be addressed to the

Assistant Attorney General,

Environment and Natural Resources

Division, United States Department of

Justice, Attention: Steven E. Rusak, Trial

Attorney, Environmental Defense

Section, P.O. Box 23986, Washington,

D.C. 20026–3986, and should refer to

United States of America v. Rueth

Builders, Inc., DJ Reference No. 90–5–1–

6–556.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the Offices of the United

States Attorney for the Northern District

of Indiana, 507 State Street, Fourth

Floor, Hammond, Indiana 46320; the

office of Greg Carlson, Wetlands

Enforcement Officer, Wetlands Division,

Wetlands and Watershed Section,

Wetlands Regulatory Unit, Region V of

the United States Environmental

Protection Agency, 77 W. Jackson

Boulevard, 16th Floor, Chicago, Illinois,

60604, (312) 886–0124, and at the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C.

20005. In requesting a copy, please

enclose a check in the amount of $2.75

for a copy of the consent decree with

attachments.

Letitia J. Grishaw,

Chief, Environmental Defense Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division,

United States Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 96–14796 Filed 6–11–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Antitrust Division

United States v. A&L Mayer

Associates, Inc., et al. No. 96–CV–40–

44 (E.D. Pa., Filed May 30, 1996);

Proposed Final Judgment and

Competitive Impact Statement

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,

15 U.S.C. 16 (b)–(h), that a proposed

Final Consent Judgment, Stipulation

and Competitive Impact Statement have

been filed with the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania in the above-captioned

case.

On May 30, 1996, the United States

filed a civil antitrust Complaint to

prevent and restrain A&L Mayer

Associates, Inc., A&L Mayer, Inc. and

Fibras Saltillo, S.A. de C.V., from

conspiring to fix prices and allocate the

sales volume of tampico fiber imported

and sold in the United States in

violation of Section 1 of the Sherman

Act (15 U.S.C. 1). Tampico fiber is a

vegetable fiber grown in Mexico and

used as a filler in industrial and

consumer brushes.

The complaint alleges that the

defendants agreed with unnamed coconspirators to: (1) Fix the prices of

tampico fiber imported into the United

States; (2) fix the resale prices charged

by their United States distributors; and

(3) allocate tampico fiber sales between

their distributors.

The proposed Final Judgment would

prohibit the defendants from entering

into any agreement or understanding

with any other processor of tampico

fiber or any of such processor’s

distributors for:

(1) Raising, fixing, or maintaining the

price or other terms or conditions for

the sale or supply of tampico fiber;

(2) Allocating sales volume,

geographic markets or customers for

tampico fiber;

(3) Taking concerted action to

discourage or eliminate new entrants

into the tampico fiber market; and

(4) Taking concerted action to restrict

or eliminate the supply of tampico fiber

to any customer.

The proposed Final Judgment would

also prohibit the defendants from

adhering to or adopting any resale