alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mustafa Y. SAID, Appellant.

No. 65470.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 21, 1995.

As Corrected Dee. 26, 1995.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Special Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after sentencing on the charge of assault first degree. The only issue is now moot. Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.








This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (the ‘‘Issuer’’).





I, Tim Courtis, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.








Dated: November 2, 2010

/s/ Tim CourtisTim Courtis
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14006]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

[Docket No. A96-15; Order No. 1113]


Lewiston, Nebraska 68380 (Lois Tegtmeier, Petitioner); Notice and 
Order Accepting Appeal and Establishing Procedural Schedule Under 29 
U.S.C. 404(b)(5)

    Issued May 30, 1996.

Docket Number: A96-15.
Name of Affected Post Office: Lewiston, Nebraska 68380.
Name(s) of Petitioner(s): Lois Tegtmeier.
Type of Determination: Consolidate.
Date of Filing of Appeal Papers: May 20, 1996.
Categories of Issues Apparently Raised:
    1. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C. 404(b)(2)(C)].
    2. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C. 404(b)(2)(A)].

    After the Postal Service files the administrative record and the 
Commission reviews it, the Commission may find that there are more 
legal issues than those set forth above. Or, the Commission may find 
that the Postal Service's determination disposes of one or more of 
those issues.
    The Postal Reorganization Act requires that the Commission issue 
its decision within 120 days from the date this appeal was filed (39 
U.S.C. 404 (b)(5)). In the interest of expedition, in light of the 120-
day decision schedule, the Commission may request the Postal Service to 
submit memoranda of law on any appropriate issue. If requested, such 
memoranda will be due 20 days from the issuance of the request and the 
Postal Service shall serve a copy of its memoranda on the petitioners. 
The Postal Service may incorporate by reference in its briefs or 
motions, any arguments presented in memoranda it previously filed in 
this docket. If necessary, the Commission also may ask petitioners or 
the Postal Service for more information.
    The Commission orders:
    (a) The Postal Service shall file the record in this appeal by June 
4, 1996.
    (b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate Commission shall publish this 
Notice and Order and Procedural Schedule in the Federal Register.

    By the Commission.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.

Appendix

May 20, 1996
    Filing of Appeal letter
May 30, 1996
    Commission Notice and Order of Filing of Appeal
June 14, 1996
    Last day of filing of petitions to intervene [see 39 CFR 
Sec. 3001.111(b)]
June 24, 1996
    Petitioner's Participant Statement or Initial Brief [see 39 CFR 
Sec. 3001.115 (a) and (b)]
July 15, 1996
    Postal Service's Answering Brief [see 39 CFR Sec. 3001.115(c)]
July 30, 1996
    Petitioner's Reply Brief should Petitioner choose to file one 
[see 39 CFR Sec. 3001.115(d)]
August 6, 1996
    Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral argument. The 
Commission will schedule oral argument only when it is a necessary 
addition to the written filings [see 39 CFR Sec. 3001.116]
September 17, 1996
    Expiration of the Commission's 120-day decisional schedule [see 
39 U.S.C. Sec. 404(b)(5)]

[FR Doc. 96-14006 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
Exhibit 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-128742 on Form F-3
and in the Registration Statement No. 333-107102 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 17, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Mittal Steel Company N.V. and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mittal Steel Company N.V. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005.

DELOITTE
ACCOUNTANTS B.V.
/s/ Deloitte Accountants B.V.
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
March 17, 2006

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 8.1
                             -----------

             LIST OF THE SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                COUNTRY OF              INTEREST
SUBSIDIARY                    INCORPORATION             OWNERSHIP
----------                    -------------             ---------

Europe-Visions A/S         (1)   Denmark                  100.0%
EuroTrust PKI Services A/S (2)   Denmark    100.0% (Assets sold April 1, 2004)
EuroTrust Virus112 A/S     (3)   Denmark   100.0% Assets sold September 30, 2004
InAphone A/S               (4)   Denmark          60.0% Sold Jan. 1, 2005

------------------------------------
     (1)  Formerly known as Euro909Media A/S
     (2)  Formerly known as EuroTrust Denmark A/S.
     (3)  Formerly known as Virus112.com A/S.
     (4)  Formerly known as 909.909 A/S


      Other significant operating subsidiaries consolidated under Europe-Visions
A/S and their  jurisdiction of incorporation and our ownership interest in those
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004:

                                            COUNTRY OF             INTEREST
SUBSIDIARY                                INCORPORATION            OWNERSHIP
----------                                -------------            ---------

Ciac A/S                                     Denmark                100.0%
Prime Vision A/S                             Denmark                100.0%
Arhustudiet A/S                              Denmark                100.0%
Publishing & Management ApS                  Denmark                 51.0%
TV Akademiet A/S                             Denmark                100.0%
Formedia A/S                                 Denmark                100.0%
Mobile Broadcasting A/S                      Denmark                100.0%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,693
<SECURITIES>                                     8,218
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                       167
<INVENTORY>                                      8,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,661
<PP&E>                                          29,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,719)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,225
<BONDS>                                         11,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,612
<SALES>                                         84,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,771
<CGS>                                           56,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    49
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,037)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,402
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,402
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
#### Herman ALLEN, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 540-91.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Jan. 27, 1993.

John M. Barron, Jr., Bryan, for appellant.

Bill Turner, Dist. Atty., and Nancy L. Hildebrand, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bryan, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, to-wit, cocaine. Tex.Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115. The jury also sentenced appellant to twelve years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division. On direct appeal, appellant raised one point of error contending the trial court erred in permitting the jury to frame questions for a witness over his objection. The court of appeals overruled this point and affirmed the conviction in a published opinion. *Allen v. State,*807 S.W.2d 639 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991). We granted appellant’s petition to determine whether the court of appeals erred in holding the trial did not abuse his discretion in allowing such questioning.

Since granting appellant’s opinion, we have decided the question presented herein. In *Morrison v. State,*845 S.W.2d 882, this Court reviewed a situation similar to the present case and concluded that “[a] change in our [trial] system involving intrusion of one component into the function of another may only be established through the limited rule making authority of this court, subject to disapproval by the legislature or by the legislature in accordance with due process.” At 888-89 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). Allowing juror questioning of witnesses in the criminal setting is, therefore, impermissible, and any excursion into this area is error not subject to a harm analysis. *Id.*

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for actions not inconsistent with this opinion.
<TABLE>
                                                                                                           EXHIBIT 21.1

<CAPTION>
                                          BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Name of Subsidiary                          Jurisdiction of Incorporation          Doing Business As (If Different)
------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>                                    <C>
BEI Sensors & Systems Company, Inc.         Delaware                               BEI Sensors & Systems Company

BEI International, Inc                      Delaware

BEI Export Sales Company, Inc.              U.S. Virgin Islands

BEI Properties, Inc.                        Arkansas

SiTek, Inc., a BEI Company                  Delaware

BEI Sensors, S.A.S.                         France

BEI Tactical Defense Systems, Inc.          Delaware

Micro Polymer Systems, Inc                  Delaware

BEI Ideacod, S.A.S.                         France

OpticNet, Inc.                              Delaware
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/Robert CoppleRobert CoppleChief Financial Officer  /s/ Carol WaldmanName:
    Carol WaldmanTitle:
    Notary Public
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14675]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-258-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of GSR Cost Recovery Filing

June 5, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 31, 1996, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with the proposed 
effective date of July 1, 1996.
    Tariff Sheets Applicable to Contesting Parties:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 14
Thirty-Third Revised Sheet No. 15
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 16
Thirty-Third Revised Sheet No. 17
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 18
Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 29
Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 30
Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 31

    Tariff Sheets Applicable to Supporting Parties:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 14A
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 15A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 16A
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 17A

    Southern sets forth in the filing of its revised demand surcharges 
and revised interruptible rates that will be charged in connection with 
its recovery of GSR costs associated with the payment of price 
differential costs under unrealigned gas supply contracts or contract 
buyout costs associated with continuing realignment efforts as well as 
sales function costs during the period February 1, 1996 through April 
30, 1996. These GSR costs have arisen as a direct result of customers' 
elections during restructuring to terminate their sales entitlements 
under Order No. 636.
    Southern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Southern's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be filed 
as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of Southern's filing are on file 
with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14675 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE>
                                                                                                                        EXHIBIT 11.1


<CAPTION>
                                               BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                                                                     YEAR ENDED
                                                                                 September 27,       September 28,     September 30,
(in thousands except per share amounts)                                              1997                1996              1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>                 <C>               <C>  
Weighted average shares outstanding                                                  7,033               6,926             6,759

Net effect of dilutive stock options
based on the treasury stock
method using fair market value                                                         170                 182              --
                                                                                    --------------------------------------------

Total weighted average shares outstanding                                            7,203               7,108             6,759
                                                                                    ============================================

Net income                                                                          $4,583              $4,571           $(2,041)
                                                                                    --------------------------------------------

Earnings per common share and common
equivalent share                                                                    $ 0.64              $ 0.64           $ (0.30)
                                                                                    ============================================
</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | UV FLU TECHNOLOGIES, INC |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   |                     |   |
|   | By:                      | /s/ John J. Lennon |
|   | Name:                    | John J. Lennon |
|   | Title:                   | President, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer) |

|   | By:    | /s/ John J. Lennon                                                                                                        |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | John J. Lennon                                                                                                            |
|   | Title: | President, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board (Principal Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer) |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 8.1


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     The following is a list of all of Novel Denim's significant subsidiaries as
of August 31, 2004, including the name, country of incorporation or residence
and of ownership interest and voting power held.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Country of                          Percentage
                                                  incorporation                       of ownership,
Name of Subsidiary                                or residence                       voting interest
------------------                                ------------                       ---------------
<S>                                              <C>                                <C>
Novel Textiles Ltd.                                 Mauritius                            100.0%
Novel Denim (HK) Ltd.                               Hong Kong                            100.0%
Novel Garments (Mauritius) Ltd.                     Mauritius                            100.0%
Nomacotex Ltd.                                      Jersey                               100.0%
Novel Garments International Ltd.                   Jersey                               100.0%
Byren Trading Ltd.                                  Jersey                               100.0%
Novel Garments (Madagascar) S.A.                    Madagascar                           100.0%
Novel Spinner (S.A.)(Pty) Ltd.                      South Africa                         100.0%
Novel Weavers (S.A.)(Pty) Ltd.                      South Africa                         100.0%
Battel Ltd.                                         British Virgin Islands               100.0%
Kotten Ltd.                                         British Virgin Islands               100.0%
Good Port Finance Ltd.                              British Virgin Islands               100.0%
Novel Dyers (S.A.) (Pty) Ltd.                       South Africa                         100.0%
Novel Garments (S.A.) (Pty) Ltd.                    South Africa                         100.0%
NDP Holdings Ltd.                                   British Virgin Islands               100.0%
NDP Investment Ltd.                                 British Virgin Islands               100.0%
Noveltex Trading Ltd.                               Hong Kong                            100.0%
NDP Trading Ltd.                                    Hong Kong                            100.0%
NDP Fabrics Ltd.                                    Hong Kong                            100.0%
Income Pearl Ltd.                                   Hong Kong                            100.0%
Novel Dyeing and Printing Mills Ltd.                China                                100.0%

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Jodi Waterman, the Vice President of Finance of Karat Platinum
      Inc.
      (Formerly Sentra Consulting Corp.) (the "Company"), does hereby certify under
      the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30,
      2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.







Dated:
                November 14,2008
            
            /s/
                Jodi WatermanJodi
                WatermanVice
                President of Finance








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.