FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Se pt e m be r 8, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 04- 15611 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e t N o s . 0 4 - 0 0 1 0 7 - C V- AA A 0 3 - 0 0 0 2 6 - C R - AA A R A Y M O N D G E L I N A S , P e titio n e r - A p p e llan t, v ersu s U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , R e s p o n d e n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( S e pt e m be r8, 2005) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B IR C H an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

R ay m o n dG e lin a s ap p e a ls , p r o s e , th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to a tta c kh is se nt ence , un der s ec t i on 22 55 of T i t l e 28 o f the U ni t ed S t at es C od e, and al l eges that h is s e n te n c in g w a s ille g a l, u n d e rB la k e lyv . W a s h in g to n , 5 4 2 U .S . ___ , 1 2 4 S . C t. 2531 ( 2004) . G e l i na s a r gue s tha tw e s houl d appl yB l a ke l yr e tr oa c t i ve l ya nd in v a lid a te h is f

e d e r a l s e n te n c e f

o rp o s s e s s io n w ith th e in te n t to d is tr ib u te o x y c o d o n e . V ar e lav . U n ite dS ta te s , 4 0 0 F .3 d8 6 4 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , c o n tr o ls s quar e l ythe que s t i on G e l i na s ’ s c e rt i f i c a t e of appe a l abi l i typr e s e nt s . W e a f f i rm the d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n u n d e rs e c tio n 2 2 5 5 . G e lin a s p le a d e dg u iltyto tw o c o u n ts o f p o s s e s s io n w ith in te n t to d is tr ib u te o x y c o d o n e a n dw a s s e n te n c e dto c o n c u rr e n t s e n te n c e s o f 4 8 m o n th s in p r is o n . G e l i na s di d notpur s ue adi r e c tappe a l . A r e tr oa c t i ve a m e ndm e ntt o the S e nt e nc i ng G u i d el i n es l at er red u cedG el i n as’ s sen t en ce t o 2 6 m o n th s i n p ri so n . In A u g u st 2004, a f t e rthe S upr e m e C ourtde c i de d B l a ke l y , G e l i na s f i l e d hi s f i r s tm ot i on f

or c o lla te r a l r e v ie w a n da r g u e dth a t h is s e n te n c e w a s ille g a l u n d e rB la k e ly . T he di stri ctcourtdeni ed G el i nas’ s m ot i on . A ft erw ar ds, the S up re m e C ou rt m a de a dvi s orythe f

e de r a l S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s i n U ni t e d S t a t e s v. B ooke r , 543 U .S . ___ , 1 2 5 S . C t. 7 3 8 ( 2 0 0 5 ) . G e lin a s th e n ap p lie df o r , an dw a s g r an te d , a c e rt i f i c a t e o f ap p e a l ab i l i tyt o a n s we rth e f o l l o wi n g two q u e s t i o n s : f i r s t , s h o u l dwe appl yB l a ke l y“ and/ or ” B ooke rr e tr oa c t i ve l yt o c a s e s on c ol l a t e r a l r e vi e w ; a nd3

s e c o n d , if

th a t ru le is r e tr o a c tiv e , w a s G e lin a s ’s s e n te n c e e n h an c e dim p r o p e r ly ba s e d on hi s pos s e s s i on of af i r e arm , af

a c tf ound bythe j udge ? W e r e vi e w the is s u e s o f law d e n o v o . V ar e la , 4 0 0 F .3 da t 8 6 7 n .3 . A pane l of

thi s C ourtha s a l r e a dyans w e r e d the f i r s tof the s e que s t i ons , a nd tha tans w e ri s di s pos i t i ve . I n V ar e l a , thi s C ourtde t e rm i ne d tha t“ S c hr i r o v. S um m e r l i n, 542 U . S . [ 348] , 124 S . C t . 2519 ( 2004) , i s e s s e nt i a l l ydi s pos i t i ve ” of thi s i s s ue a nd, l i ke the ne w rul e a nnounc e d i n R i ng v. A r i z ona , 536 U . S . 584, 122 S . C t . 2428 ( 2002) , the “ pr ot otypi c a l pr oc e dur a l rul e ” of B ooke rs houl d notbe appl i e d r e tr oa c t i ve l yt o c a s e s on c ol l a t e r a l r e vi e w . 400 F . 3d a t867. T he de ni a l of G e lin a s ’s m o tio n is , th e r e f o r e , AF F I RME D.