alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Parks! America, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully
complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Dated:
February 9, 2010





/s/ Todd D. MontgomeryTodd
      D. MontgomeryChief
      Executive OfficerInfrastructure
      Materials Corp.





Dated:
February 9, 2010





/s/ Rakesh MalhotraRakesh
      MalhotraChief
      Financial OfficerInfrastructure
      Materials Corp.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infrastructure Material Corp. and will be retained by Infrastructure Materials
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Julio Cesar Arias-Trujillo, 

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00396-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER 

 On April 30, 2019, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for revocation 

of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court 

considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released on 

conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 

3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 30th day of April, 2019. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of UTEC, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Fortunato Villamagna, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Fortunato Villamagna Fortunato Villamagna, CEO Dated:  August 26, 2008    Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of UTEC, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, J. Curt Stafford, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ J. Curt Stafford J. Curt Stafford, CFO Dated:  August 26, 2008
ex_10-6.htm


    
      	 
      	
                                                                                
      Exhibit 10.6

            
	 
      	 
      
	
              INDEMNIFICATION
      AGREEMENTS

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
              MariLyn
      R. Blair

            	 
      
	
              Michael
      B. Bracy

            	 
      
	
              Robert
      M. Burks, Jr.

            	 
      
	
              Deloris
      R. Duquette

            	 
      
	
              C.R.
      Dwiggins, Jr.

            	 
      
	
              Kirby
      A. Dyess

            	 
      
	
              Larry
      H. Eggleston

            	 
      
	
              Jon
      E. Eliassen

            	 
      
	
              Charles
      H. Gaylord

            	 
      
	
              Thomas
      S. Glanville

            	 
      
	
              Steven
      M. Helmbrecht

            	 
      
	
              John
      W. Holleran

            	 
      
	
              Philippe
      Le Bris

            	 
      
	
              Chuck
      McAtee

            	 
      
	
              Philip
      C. Mezey

            	 
      
	
              Sharon
      L. Nelson

            	 
      
	
              LeRoy
      D. Nosbaum

            	 
      
	
              Carl
      W. Porter

            	 
      
	
              Gary
      E. Pruitt

            	 
      
	
              Marcel
      Regnier

            	 
      
	
              Jared
      P. Serff

            	 
      
	
              Douglas
      L. Staker

            	 
      
	
              Malcolm
      Unsworth

            	 
      
	
              Russell
      E. Vanos

            	 
      
	
              Robert
      W. Whitney

            	 
      
	
              Graham
      M. Wilson
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1783 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 14

- 00516

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.O. and A.O., Children

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- P A

- 02019

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 15, 2014

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

This is an appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant father’s parental rights.

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because the trial court granted appellant’s motion

for new trial. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1( a)(1). We order that no costs be

assessed against appellant because he is indigent.

PER CURIAM

1 The Honorable John D. Gabriel is the presiding judge of the 131st Civil District Court. However, the order of

termination was signed by Associate Judge Charles Montemayor.
**EXHIBIT 8**

**LIST OF EDAP TMS S.A. SUBSIDIARIES(as of March 31, 2002)**

| **Name of Subsidiary**        |          |           **Juridiction of Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |
| Techomed Medical Systems S.A.                                    |          | France                                                                                       |
| EDAP Technomed  S.r.l.                                 | Italy         |
| EDAP Technomed, Inc.                                             | United States |
| EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd.                                          | Japan         |
| EDAP Technomed Sdn Bhd                                           | Malaysia      |
| HIFU S.A.                                                        | France        |
|                                                             |          |
|                                                             |          |
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Anthony A. DiTonno, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeurogesX, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 14, 2007



By:

/s/ Anthony A. DiTonnoAnthony A. DiTonnoPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 13

- 9003

_____________

JAMES A. DENNIS

v.

SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENE;

SUPERINTENDENT, S TATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW;

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Appellants

On appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(District Court No.: 2

- 11

- cv

- 01660)

District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, t he opinion filed on August 23, 2016 in the above

- captioned

appeal is hereby amended to reflect that the Honorable Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

joins in the concurring opinion filed by the Honorable Theodore A. McKee, Chief Judge

.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: August 23, 2016
IV 

House Calendar No. 125 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 876 

[Report No. 111–318] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 2996) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, 

environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2996) making appropriations for 

the Department of the Interior, environment, and related 

agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2996) making appropriations for 

4 the Department of the Interior, environment, and related 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 876 RH 

1 agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, 

2 and for other purposes. The conference report shall be 

3 considered as read. All points of order against the con4 ference report and against its consideration are waived. 

5 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

6 the conference report to its adoption without intervening 

7 motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion 

8 to recommit if applicable. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS

pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 125 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 876 

[Report No. 111–318] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

purposes. year ending September 30, 2010, and for other environment, and related agencies for the fiscal propriations for the Department of the Interior, to accompany the bill (H.R. 2996) making apOCTOBER 28, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
(LOGO)KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

700 Louisiana          Telephone 713 319 2000    
Houston, TX 77002      Telex 286705 PMMT UR (RCA)       Fax 713 319 2041
                

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Chairman of the Board 
Equivantage Inc.:

We have examined  management's  assertion about Equivantage Inc.'s (the Company)
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in the  Mortgage
Bankers  Association  of  America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION  PROGRAM  FOR
MORTGAGE BANKERS as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, included in the
accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the  Company's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that EquiVantage Inc. has complied in all
material respects with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of and
for the year  ended  December  31,  1997,  is  fairly  stated,  in all  material
respects.


/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

February 16, 1998
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Robert L. CARTER, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67373.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 21, 1995.

John M. Sehilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Geh., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, J., and WHITE, Special Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions by a jury for rape, § 566.030, RSMo Supp.1991, attempted rape, §§ 564.011, RSMo 1986, and 566.030, RSMo Supp.1992, tampering with a victim, § 575.270.2, RSMo 1986, and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentence in accordance with the jury’s assessment to concurrent twenty-five year sentences for rape, attempted rape and both armed criminal action convictions, and a consecutive five year term for the tampering conviction. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00576

- CR

Patricia Elizabeth Harkcom

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§

§ From the 355th District Court

o f Hood County (CR12165 )

October 2, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

Dissent by Justice Walker

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the a ppeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41351

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EFRAIN CASTILLO-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-239-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Efrain Castillo-Rodriguez appeals his judgment of conviction

and sentence after pleading guilty to reentry after deportation

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that he was charged

with and pleaded guilty to § 1326(a), simple reentry, but that he

was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a

conviction for an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2). 

His argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 1998 WL 126904,

at *3, *8 (U.S. Mar. 24, 1998).
No. 97-41351

- 2 -

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 21

                RELIANT BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               JURISDICTION
      INCORPORATION                                            OF SUBSIDIARY
      -------------                                            -------------
<S>                                                            <C>
Alpine Industries, Inc..........................................Washington

Care Free Aluminum Products, Inc..................................Michigan

CFA Holding Company...............................................Delaware

RBP of Arizona, Inc...............................................Delaware

RBP Custom Glass, Inc.............................................Delaware

RBP Fenesco, Inc..................................................Delaware

RBP of Texas, Inc.................................................Delaware

RBP Trans, Inc....................................................Delaware

Ultra Building Systems, Inc.....................................New Jersey
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1049 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1049

   To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive certain 
 provisions of the pre-September 11, 2001, fire grant program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2009

 Mr. Dodd (for himself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive certain 
 provisions of the pre-September 11, 2001, fire grant program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVERS FOR CERTAIN FIRE GRANT PROGRAM PROVISIONS.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security may waive or modify the 
requirements of subparagraph (B) of section 34(a)(1) of the Federal 
Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229a(a)(1)) and the 
provisions in section 34(c) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2229a(c)) for a 
recipient of a grant awarded during fiscal year 2009 or 2010 under such 
section 34(a)(1) for the hiring, rehiring, or retention of 
firefighters.
                                 <all>
```