30096 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 115 / Thursday, June 13, 1996 / Notices

June, 1996. Applications for

consideration under Round I must be

postmarked on or before July 22, 1996.

Applications postmarked after July 22,

1996, but postmarked on or before

August 15, 1996, will be considered

under Round II.

Applicants are required to focus on

one specific crime or disorder problem.

These include: residential or

commercial burglary; auto theft; larceny;

homicide; assault; rape/sexual assault;

alcohol-related problems; street-level

drug dealing or drug-related problems;

vandalism, prostitution or other

disorder problems. Applicants will

conduct an in-depth inquiry into the

causes of the problem, develop tailormade responses to it, and assess the

impact of those responses.

Problem-Solving Partnerships is

expected to be a very competitive grant

program. Up to $40,000,000 in ProblemSolving partnership grants will be

awarded. No local match is required,

but applicants are encouraged to

contribute cash or in-kind resources to

their proposed projects. A minimum of

5 percent of the grant award must be

used to evaluate the impact of the

problem-solving effort on the targeted

crime or disorder problem. Grant funds

must be used to supplement, and not

supplant, state or local funds that

otherwise would be devoted to public

safety activities.

Law enforcement agencies generally

must partner with a non-profit,

community-based entity or municipal

agency. Such a partnership must be

outlined in a collaboration agreement

that accompanies the application. Law

enforcement agencies (primary

applicants) only may submit one

application. Community-based entities

(secondary applicants) may partner with

one or more law enforcement agencies

and, therefore, may appear in more than

one application.

An award under the Problem-Solving

Partnerships grant program will not

affect the eligibility of an agency to

receive awards under any other COPS

program.

Dated: Dated June 6, 1996.

Joseph E. Brann,

Director.

[FR Doc. 96–14973 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a consent decree was lodged

in U.S. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and

Chevron Pipe Line Company, Civil

Action No. C 96–2082 (N.D. Cal.) on

June 5, 1996, with the United States

District Court for the Northern District

of California. The case is a civil action

under Section 113(b) of the Clean Air

Act (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(b), for

violations of provisions of the Act and

of the regulations for New Source

Performance Standards (‘‘NSPS’’) in

subparts Ka and Kb of Part 60 of 40 CFR

that require all openings in the roofs of

petroleum storage tanks that are subject

to the regulations to be sealed or

covered.

The violations of the NSPS

regulations involved Chevron’s

Richmond Refinery in Richmond,

California and Chevron’s pipeline

transfer station in La Mirada, California.

Petroleum storage tanks at these

facilities have ‘‘guideposts’’ that pass

through the roofs of the storage tanks.

The complaint alleges that the

defendant’s use of ‘‘slotted’’

guidepoles—guidepoles perforated by a

series of slots along the length of the

pole—violate NSPS that require all

openings in the roofs of petroleum

storage tanks to be sealed or covered.

The complaint seeks injunctive relief to

ensure future compliance with the

NSPS regulations. Under the consent

decree, Chevron Richmond will retofit a

total of 18 tanks with agreed upon

emission control equipment and

Chevron La Mirada will retrofit one

tank. After retrofitting the specified

tanks, the defendant is required to

operate the emissions control

equipment specified by its consent

decree in compliance with the Clean Air

Act and its consent decree.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed

consent decree. Comments should be

addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and

copied to Helen Kang, Environmental

Enforcement Section, U.S. Department

of Justice, 301 Howard Street, Suite 870,

San Francisco, CA 94105, and should

refer to U.S. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and

Chevron Pipe Line Company, DOJ Nos.

90–11–3–1398 and 90–5–2–1–1965.

The proposed Chevron consent decree

may be examined at the office of the

United States Attorney, Northern

District of California, 450 Golden Gate

Avenue, San Francisco, California

94102; the Region IX Office of the

Environmental Protection Agency, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,

California 94105; and at the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202)

624–0892. A copy of the proposed

consent decree may be obtained in

person or by mail from the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. To

request a copy of the consent decree in

United States v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.

and Chevron Pipe Line Company, please

refer to that case and DOJ Nos. 90–5–2–

1–1965 and 90–11–3–1398 and enclose

a check for the amount of $4.50. Your

check should be payable to the Consent

Decree Library.

Joel Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 96–14978 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a consent decree was lodged

in U.S. v. Mobil Oil Corp., Civil Action

No. CV 96–3981–RSWL (SHx) (C.D.

Cal.) on June 5, 1996, with the United

States District court for the Central

District of California. The case is a civil

action under Section 113(b) of the Clean

Air Act (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b), for

violations of provisions of the Act and

of the regulations for New Source

Performance Standards (‘‘NSPS’’) in

subparts Ka and Kb of Part 60 of 40 CFR

that require all openings in the roofs of

petroleum storage tanks that are subject

to the regulations to be sealed or

covered.

The violations of the NSPS

regulations involved Mobil’s Torrance

Refinery, located in Los Angeles

County, California. Petroleum storage

tanks at this facility have ‘‘guidepoles’’

that pass through the roofs of the storage

tanks. The complaint alleges that the

defendant’s use of ‘‘slotted’’

guidepoles—guidepoles perforated by a

series of slots along the length of the

pole—violate NSPS that require all

openings in the roofs of petroleum

storage tanks to be sealed or covered.

The complaint seeks injunctive relief to

ensure future compliance with the

NSPS regulations. Under the consent

decree, Mobil will retrofit a total of 20

tanks with agreed upon emission

control equipment. After retrofitting the

specified tanks, the defendant is

required to operate the emissions

control equipment specified by its

consent decree in compliance with the

Clean Air Act and its consent decree.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed