Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Notices 31147

replace existing temporary facilities, a

hostel in the entrance area, a new

interpretive center with additional

administrative space, a 50-site

expansion to Riley Creek campground,

and upgraded trail maintenance in the

entrance area.

Alternative C (Reduce Facilities and

Services Inside Park) would reduce the

level of development and visitor

services inside the park and encourage

the private sector to provide necessary

new facilities such as overnight

accommodations, campgrounds, and

camper conveniences outside the park

boundary. Major new park facilities

such as an interpretive center and an

environmental education center would

be constructed outside the park as well.

The park entrance area would function

primarily as a staging area for trips

farther into the park rather than as a

destination in itself. This alternative

allows for minimizing resource impacts

and therefore maximizing resource

protection inside the park.

Alternative E (Emphasize Visitor

Services and Recreational Opportunities

Within the Park) would significantly

enhance the visitor experience by

concentrating new development inside

the park and providing a diversity of

visitor facilities and services in the front

country to meet a wide range of visitor

needs and interests. The NPS would

take the leading role in providing new

visitor services. A new hotel would

replace the existing temporary building,

and a hostel or similar low-cost

accommodations would be constructed

at a separate location. A new

interpretive center, a camper

conveniences center, and an

environmental education facility would

be constructed just north of Riley Creek

Campground. Additional campsites

would be developed throughout the

front country. New permanent rest areas

would be constructed at Toklat and

Savage, and trails would be upgraded

and expanded at several locations. Road

maintenance and repair along the park

road would be upgraded to address

documented structural problems as well

as safety concerns and actual structural

failures.

Dated: June 6, 1996.

Robert D. Barbee,

Field Director, Alaska Field Office.

[FR Doc. 96–15451 Filed 6–18–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining

Reclamation and Enforcement.

ACTION: Notice and request for

comments.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing

its intention to request approval for the

collections of information for 30 CFR

parts 886 and 887.

DATES: Comments on the proposed

information collection must be received

by August 19, 1996 to be assured of

consideration.

ADDRESSES: . Comments may be mailed

to John A. Trelease, Office of Surface

Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,

1951 Constitution Ave, NW., Room 120–

SIB, Washington, DC 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

To request a copy of the information

collection request, explanatory

information and related forms, contact

John A. Trelease, at (202) 208–2783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office

of Management and Budget (OMB)

regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which

implement provisions of the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),

require that interested members of the

public and affected agencies have an

opportunity to comment on information

collection and recordkeeping activities

(see 5 CFR 1320.8 (d)). This notice

identifies information collections that

OSM will be submitting to OMB for

extension. These collections are

contained in 30 CFR part 886, State and

Tribal Reclamation Grants; and part 887,

Subsidence Insurance Program Grants.

OSM has revised burden estimates,

where appropriate, to reflect current

reporting levels or adjustments based on

reestimates of burden or respondents.

OSM will request a 3-year term of

approval for each information collection

activity.

Comments are invited on: (1) the need

for the collection of information for the

performance of the functions of the

agency; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s

burden estimates; (3) ways to enhance

the quality, utility and clarity of the

information collection; and (4) ways to

minimize the information collection

burden on respondents, such as use of

automated means of collection of the

information. A summary of the public

comments will be included in OSM’s

submissions of the information

collection requests to OMB.

The following information is provided

for each information collection: (1) title

of the information collection; (2) OMB

control number; (3) summary of the

information collection activity; and (4)

frequency of collection, description of

the respondents, estimated total annual

responses, and the total annual

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

the collection of information.

Title: State and Tribal Reclamation

Grants—30 CFR 886.

OMB control Number: 1029–0059.

Summary: States and Indian tribes

participating in the Abandoned Mined

Land Reclamation Fund (AMLR)

Program are requested to cooperate with

OSM in developing budget information

for use by the Director, OSM, in the

preparation of his request to Congress

for appropriation of monies from the

AMLR as authorized by section 405(f) of

the Surface Mining Control and

Reclamation Act of 1977.

Bureau Form Number: OSM–49.

Frequency of Collection: Annually.

Description of Respondents: State and

Tribal reclamation authorities.

Total Annual Responses: 26.

Tatal Annual Burden Hours: 130

hours

Title: Subsidence Insurance Program

Grants—30 CFR 887.

OMB Control Number: 1029–0107.

Summary: States having an approved

reclamation plan may establish,

administer and operate self-sustaining

state-administered programs to insure

private property against damages caused

by land subsidence resulting from

underground mining. States interested

in requesting monies for their insurance

programs would apply to the Director of

OSM.

Bureau Form Number: None.

Frequency of Collection: Once.

Description of Respondents: States

with approved coal reclamation plans.

Total Annual Responses: 0.

Total Annual Burden Hours: 1.

Dated: June 14, 1996.

Gene E. Krueger,

Acting Chief, Office of Technology

Development and Transfer.

[FR Doc. 96–15623 Filed 6–18–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
31148 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Notices

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337–TA–380]

Certain Agricultural Tractors Under 50

Power Take-Off Horsepower; Notice of

Commission Determination Not To

Review an Initial Determination Finding

Three Respondents To Be in Default

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission had determined not to

review the initial determination (ID) of

the presiding administrative law judge

(ALJ) in the above-captioned

investigation finding respondents

Tractor Company, Sonica Trading, Inc.

(Sonica Trading), and Toyo Service Co.,

Ltd. (Toyo Service) in default, and to

have waived their respective rights to

appear, to be served with documents,

and to contest the allegations at issue in

the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shara L. Aranoff, Esq., Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. International

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone 202–

205–3090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Neither

Tractor Company, Sonica Trading, nor

Toyo Service filed a response to the

notice of investigation or the complaint,

a discovery statement, a target date

statement, or responses to complainants’

discovery requests. On April 8, 1996,

complainants Kubota Tractor

Corporation, Kubota Manufacturing of

America Corporation, and Kubota

Corporation moved that Tractor

Company, Sonica Trading, and Toyo

Service be ordered to show cause why

they should not be found in default, and

if they failed to make such a showing,

that an ID be issued finding them to be

in default. On April 17, 1996, the ALJ

ordered the subject respondents to show

cause no later than May 3, 1996, why

each should not be found in default

(Order No. 8). None of the three

respondents filed a response to the

order. Accordingly, on May 8, 1996, the

ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 13) finding

Tractor Company, Sonica Trading, and

Toyo Service in default pursuant to

Commission final rule 210.16, and

ruling that they had waived their

respective rights to appear, to be served

with documents, and to contest the

allegations at issue in the investigation.

No petitions for review of the ID were

received.

This action is taken under the

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337),

and section 210.42 of the Commission’s

final Rules of Practice and Procedure

(19 CFR § 210.42).

Copies of the ID and all other

nonconfidential documents filed in

connection with this investigation are

available for inspection during official

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436,

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing

impaired persons are advised that

information on the matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal at 202–

205–1810.

Issued: June 10, 1996.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–15610 Filed 6–18–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

[Inv. No. 337–TA–388]

Certain Dynamic Random Access

Memory Controllers and Certain MultiLayer Integrated Circuits, as well as

Chipsets and Products Containing

Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on May

13, 1996, under section 337 of the Tariff

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.

§ 1337, on behalf of Intel Corporation,

2200 Mission College Boulevard, Santa

Clara, California 95052- 8119. The

complaint was amended on May 24,

1996, and June 4, 1996, and

supplemented on May 28, 1996. The

complaint, as amended and

supplemented, alleges violations of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain dynamic

random access memory controllers and

certain multi-layer integrated circuits, as

well as chipsets and products

containing same, that infringe claims 1,

2, 5, 7, and 15 of United States Letters

Patent 5,307,320, and claims 1 and 11

of United States Letters Patent

4,775,550.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after a hearing, issue a permanent

exclusion order and permanent cease

and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for

any confidential information contained

therein, is available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Room

112, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

202–205–1802. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Smith R. Brittingham IV, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission,

telephone 202–205–2576.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10.

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

June 12, 1996, ORDERED THAT—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain dynamic random

access memory controllers and certain

multi-layer integrated circuits, as well

as chipsets and products containing

same, by reason of infringement of

claims 1, 2, 5, 7, or 15 of United States

Letters Patent 5,307,320, or claims 1 or

11 of United States Letters Patent

4,775,550; and whether there exists an

industry in the United States as required

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—Intel

Corporation, 2200 Mission College

Boulevard, Santa Clara, California

95052–8119.

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

United Microelectronics Corporation,

No. 13 Innovation Road I, ScienceBased Industrial Park, Hsinchu,

Taiwan

Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation,

2F No. 17 Innovation Rd. I, ScienceBased Industrial Park, Hsinchu,

Taiwan