alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 563 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 563

 Congratulating the Onondaga Community College Lazers for winning the 
 National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) Division I Men's 
                          Lacrosse Tournament.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2009

 Mr. Maffei submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the Onondaga Community College Lazers for winning the 
 National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) Division I Men's 
                          Lacrosse Tournament.

Whereas, on May 10, 2009, the Onondaga Community College Lazers defeated Nassau 
        Community College 9-8 in the finals of the National Junior College 
        Athletic Association (NJCAA) Division I Men's Lacrosse Tournament at 
        Herkimer County Community College;
Whereas the Lazers now holds 3 men's lacrosse national titles;
Whereas Head Coach Chuck Wilbur was the NJCAA Men's Lacrosse Coach of the Year;
Whereas the Lazers completed an undefeated season;
Whereas the Lazers' players, coaches, and staff are excellent representatives of 
        Onondaga Community College;
Whereas Jerome Thompson and Jon Fiorillo were named the Offensive and Defensive 
        Players of the Year respectively by the NJCAA Men's Lacrosse Coaches 
        Association; and
Whereas the residents of Onondaga County and fans are to be congratulated for 
        their support, dedication, and pride in the team: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
Onondaga Community College Lazers for winning the National Junior 
College Athletic Association (NJCAA) Division I Men's Lacrosse 
Tournament.
                                 <all>
```
### The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the reports and recommendations of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 95-4223

___________ Shelby Harris, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States J. D. Kaver, Functional Unit * District Court for the Manager; Phillip Higgins, * Western District of Missouri. COII; John Sigler, Caseworker; * Charles Kirsh, Assistant * [UNPUBLISHED] Caseworker; Greg Mullarkey, * COI; J. Pedro, COI; William * Wade, Director of CMS; Cain, * Nurse at CMCC, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 19, 1997 Filed: March 20, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shelby Harris, a Missouri prisoner, appeals from the grant of s ummary judgment by the District Court in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C . 1 § 1983 (1994) action. Having reviewed the record and

### -2-

theparties’ briefs, we conclude that the judgment of the District Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th C ir. R. 47B. Additionally, we deny Harris’s motion for legal materials. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


         The undersigned hereby certifies that she is the duly elected and
acting Assistant Treasurer of Southern California Edison Company, as servicer
(the "Servicer") under the Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of
December 11, 1997 (the "Servicing Agreement") between the Servicer and SCE
Funding LLC (the "Note Issuer") and further that:

 1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under
      the Servicing Agreement during the twelve months ended June 30, 1999
      has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to
      Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

 2.   To the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review,
      the Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations in all
      material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the
      twelve months ended June 30, 1999, except for those material
      defaults in the fulfillment of material obligations listed on
      Annex A hereto.

 Executed this 30th day of September, 1999.


                               SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY



                              By:  Mary Simpson
                              -----------------------------------------------
                                   Mary Simpson
                                   Assistant Treasurer


<PAGE>



                                     ANNEX A
                                       TO
                            CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

                            LIST OF SERVICER DEFAULTS



The following material defaults known to the undersigned occurred during the
year ended December 31, 1999.

Nature of Default                                            Status
-----------------                                            ------
None
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S (the  "Company")
on Form  20-F/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Aldo
M.N. Petersen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


Dated:  November 29, 2005                       /s/ ALDO M.N. PETERSEN
                                                ----------------------
                                                Aldo M.N. Petersen
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CX2 Technologies., Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Lester Hahn, Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the end of and for the period covered by the Report.





Date:  June
25, 2010




/s/ Lester
      Hahn
              Lester
      Hahn, Chief Executive Officer,President,
      Principal
                Executive,
      Financial and Accounting
  Officer
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of RiT Technologies Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avi Kovarsky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 28, 2010





By: /s/ Avi Kovarsky


Avi Kovarsky


President and Chief Executive Officer
([KLELW$

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1027-1 Filed 06/26/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1027-1 Filed 06/26/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1027-1 Filed 06/26/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1027-1 Filed 06/26/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1027-1 Filed 06/26/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1027-1 Filed 06/26/20 Page 6 of 6
H. Res. 713 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 19, 2010. 

Whereas auto dealers have deep roots in local communities 

and have helped manufacturers with long-term customer 

relationships that create brand loyalty and maintain customer convenience; 

Whereas dealerships across the country provide jobs, give direct investments to local economies, and supply tax revenue to State and local governments; 

Whereas virtually all new cars and light trucks bought in the 

United States are sold through franchised dealers; 

Whereas dealers are independently owned, and combined, represent the largest retail business in the United States, 

with approximately $693,000,000,000 in revenues in 

2007; 

Whereas auto dealers are significant employers in local communities across the country; 

Whereas franchised dealers employ over 1,100,000 people, 

comprise nearly 20 percent of all retail sales in the 

United States, and, in total, pay billions annually in state 

and local taxes; 

Whereas the Nation’s 20,700 independent franchised new car 

dealerships comprise an industry that is largely privately 
2 

•HRES 713 EH 

held, with private ownership accounting for 92 percent of 

the market; 

Whereas the franchised dealership system in the United 

States is the independent link between the manufacturer’s assembly line and the consumer and its functions include, but are not limited, to the following— 

(1) selling the product and providing information for 

consumers; 

(2) holding vehicle and parts inventory; 

(3) performing service and providing parts to fulfill 

manufacturer warranty obligations; 

(4) handling product safety recalls; 

(5) facilitating the exchange of used vehicles; and 

(6) arranging financing for consumers; 

Whereas some restructuring of dealer networks was in the 

public interest and necessary to increase the competitiveness of automobile manufacturers; 

Whereas the economic downturn put thousands of jobs at 

risk, including those at automobile dealerships and automobile manufacturers; and 

Whereas auto dealers will play a key role in any effort to revive the United States auto industry: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That— 

(1) the House of Representatives recognizes the significant contributions of United States automobile dealerships; and 

(2) it is the sense of the House of Representatives 

that automobile dealerships which have been successful 

and are being closed not of their own doing, but instead 
3 

•HRES 713 EH 

as a function of the auto market as a whole, should be 

given consideration to obtain a dealership franchise when 

the automobile market rebounds and stabilizes. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 97-60225

Summary Calendar

________________________

JODY DERAMUS, Individually and as 

Administratrix of the Estate of 

John Doe (Frank Deramus),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Mississippi

(3:92-CV-225WS)

___________________________________________________________________

January 9, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, AND PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

On March 19, 1992, the appellant, Jody Deramus, individually

and as the administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband,

Frank Deramus, filed suit against the appellee, Jackson National

Life Insurance Company (“JNL”), in Mississippi state court,

alleging that JNL was negligent in not disclosing that it had

discovered, during its consideration of a life insurance

application by Mr. Deramus, that Mr. Demarus was infected with HIV.

On April 17, 1992, JNL timely removed the action to federal court
- 2 -

based on diversity of citizenship. On September 29, 1995, after

nearly three and one-half years of pre-trial proceedings, the

district court granted JNL’s motion to dismiss and/or for summary

judgment, finding that, under the factual circumstances of the

case, JNL did not have a duty to disclose to either Mr. or Mrs.

Deramus that it had discovered that Mr. Deramus was infected with

HIV. On appeal, this court affirmed, adopting the memorandum

opinion of the district court, and taxed costs against the

appellant in the amount of $184.25. Deramus v. Jackson Nat’l Life

Ins. Co., 92 F.3d 274 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 956

(1997).

Upon completion of the first appeal, the district court held

a hearing on the appellant’s objections to JNL’s bill of costs. By

Order dated March 10, 1997, the district court awarded JNL costs in

the amount of $2,592.64. In this appeal, the appellant argues that

the district court erred in awarding JNL the following costs: (1)

$75.00 for the cost of obtaining a legible transcription of the

decedent’s medical records; (2) $1,621.60 for deposition

transcripts; (3) $366.54 for copies of medical and tax records; and

(4) $85.50 for “additional” copies of JNL’s pleadings. 

After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’

arguments on appeal, we are unable to find that the district court

abused its discretion in awarding JNL the above costs. See

Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Kellstrom, 50 F.3d 319, 334 (5th
 

2 In addition, the appellant’s motion to strike brief for appellee is

DENIED.

- 3 -

Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we AFFIRM.2
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                          |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

|                                                                                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                     |
| /s/    Meg A. Gentle                                                                                                                            |
| Meg A. GentleChief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. |
J

- E03006

- 15 2016 PA Super 51

COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. WANYA ROSSER, Appellant No. 3258 EDA 2013

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence June 4 , 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 46

- CR

- 0008571

- 2010
BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., BENDER, P.J.E., BOWES, J., PANELLA, J.,

SHOGAN, J., LAZARUS, J., OTT, J., STABILE, J., AND JENKINS, J.
CONCURRING STATEMENT BY BOWES, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 26, 2016 I concur in the result reached by the distinguished majority. Preliminarily, I agree that Appellant waived his federal and state confrontation clause argument and that his weight of the evidence position is without merit. However, I cannot agree that Commonwealth v. Briggs , 12 A.3d 291 (Pa. 2011), implicitly speaks to the merits of the waived constitutional issue in question. The Briggs Court, as recognized by the learned majority, nowhere mentioned the confrontation clause. Accordingly, Briggs is simply inapposite as to a confrontation clause analysis. I would refrain from addressing the merits of an important constitutional question based in part on a case that simply d oes not speak to the issue and await the proper case.J

- E03006

- 15

- 2

-

By addressing an issue that is not properly preserved, the majority precludes any development of this argument under the ineffective assistance of counsel rubric that could be advanced in a PCRA petit ion. The underlying claim is one which at least two members of the current Pennsylvania Supreme Court consider to have potential merit. 1 Indeed, part of the rationale used for upholding the trial court’s decision to prohibit the question at issue is that Appellant did not testify and counsel did not provide a foundation for the proposed cross

- examination. Both of these matters could implicate counsel’s representation. Since I believe it is imprudent to address the merits of Appellant’s waived argument u nder the facts of this case, I concur in the result. 2

____________________________________________ 1 The original panel majority in this matter consisted of Judges, now Justices, Christine Donohue and David Wecht.

2 I note that the trial court erroneously concluded that Appellant’s question would elicit hearsay as the answer would not have been introduced to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00252-CR

Benjamin ESCOBEDO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4634

Honorable Kevin M. O’Connell, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment with regard 

to Appellant’s conviction for the offense of continuous sexual abuse of a child is AFFIRMED. The 

trial court’s judgment with regard to Appellant’s convictions for the offenses of sexual assault of 

a child and indecency with a child by contact, as alleged in Counts II, IV, and V, are REVERSED 

AND VACATED. 

SIGNED December 27, 2018.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer February 14, 2011
SAMPLE PRIME STOCK CERTIFICATE

Certificate Number                                         No. Shares

                      Incorporated Under the Laws of the
                       State of Delaware, March 31, 1997


                           PRIME COMPANIES, INC.

Authorized Capital Stock, 50,000,000 Common Shares, Par Value
$0.0001 Per Share

THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE BEEN ISSUED
UNDER THE LIMIT OFFERING EXEMPTION PROVIDED BY SEC.25102(f) OF
THE CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE.

  THIS CERTIFIES THAT __________________________________ is the
                           owner of

  _________________________________ Shares of the Capital Stock
                               of

                      PRIME COMPANIES, INC.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the
holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and
to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporationthis
____________________ day of ______________________ A. D. 19
__________.

____________________                                  ___________________
Secretary                                             President