alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15814]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP96-566-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

June 17, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 11, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 1700 McCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West 
Virginia 25314-1599, filed in Docket No. CP96-566-000 a request 
pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for 
authorization to establish a new delivery point to accommodate 
deliveries of gas transported on a firm basis for Columbia Gas of 
Pennsylvania, Inc. (CPA), in Adams County, Pennsylvania, under 
Columbia's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000, 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Columbia proposes to construct and operate a 2-inch tap, 
approximately 25 feet of 2-inch pipeline and a filter separator in 
order to deliver up to 85 dt equivalent of natural gas per day to CPA 
at a delivery point to be known as the Pheasant Meadows delivery point. 
Columbia states that it would transport the gas for CPA under its 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP86-240-000 and pursuant to 
the terms of its Rate Schedule SST. It is asserted that Columbia would 
reduce the Maximum Daily Delivery Obligation at its Abbottstown 
delivery point by 85 dt equivalent of natural gas per day in order to 
accommodate the deliveries at the Pheasant Meadows point without 
increasing CPA's daily entitlement. It is stated that the end use of 
the gas would be residential, for the Pheasant Meadows subdivision. It 
is estimated that the cost of facilities for the proposed delivery 
point would be $25,000, for which Columbia would be reimbursed 100 
percent by CPA. It is asserted that the proposed deliveries would not 
have any impact on Columbia's peak day obligations.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be 
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for filing a 
protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after 
the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be 
treated as an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15814 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
exv10w3





 Exhibit
10.3


UST 320




WAIVER




     In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in
the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily
waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or
benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury
as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.



     I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus,
incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called
“golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired
through the TARP Capital Purchase Program.



     This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state
related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation
a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the
process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect
of these regulations on my employment relationship.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: February ___, 2009
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 






(2.5)

UST 320

Westamerica Bancorporation

Jennifer J. Finger – SVP & Treasurer

20212944.1
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 854 

Recognizing Weber State University for the 120th anniversary of its founding 

as an institution of higher education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Weber State University for the 120th anniversary of its founding as an institution of higher education. 

Whereas Weber State University (WSU) was founded in 

1889 as Weber State Academy; 

Whereas WSU celebrates its 120th anniversary this year; 

Whereas WSU is a public university that offers associate’s, 

bachelor’s, and master’s degrees, as well as professional, 

liberal arts, and technical certificates; 

Whereas WSU is located in Ogden, Utah, and has an additional campus in Layton, Utah; 

Whereas WSU serves more than 23,000 full-time and parttime students; 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 854 IH 

Whereas the WSU Wildcats have 14 intercollegiate programs 

that participate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletics; 

Whereas Weber State University promotes community involvement and community-based learning experiences for 

its students; and 

Whereas Weber State University prides itself in its excellent 

teaching, commitment to meeting the needs of students, 

and ongoing service to the community: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Weber State University on 

3 the 120th anniversary of its founding as an institu4 tion of higher education; and 

5 (2) recognizes the contributions of Weber State 

6 University to its students and community. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc. 10-Q








Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Kai GUI, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated this 17th day of March 2011./s/ Kai GUIKai GUI, Director, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15485]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-2967]


California Medical Association; Prohibited Trade Practices and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Set Aside Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order reopens a 1979 consent order, which prohibited the 
medical association from participating in the creation or dissemination 
of fee schedules relating to physician compensation, and sets aside the 
consent order pursuant to the Commission's determination that the 
public interest requires reopening and setting aside the order because 
the order presents an obstacle to the respondent forming and operating 
a managed care subsidiary.

DATES: Consent order issued April 17, 1979. Set aside order issued 
October 27, 1995.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Consent Order, Set Aside Order and 
Commissioner Starek's statement are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Baruch, FTC/S-2115, 
Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-2861.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Matter of California Medical 
Association. The prohibited trade practices and/or corrective actions 
are removed as indicated.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15485 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dunn Mining Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  September 14, 2007





/s/ Gregory Paul Byrne

Gregory Paul Byrne, Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14739]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket A(27f)-18-96]


Foreign-Trade Zone 160--Anchorage, AK; Request for Boundary 
Modification

    The Municipality of Anchorage, grantee of FTZ 160, has made a 
request to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board for a minor modification 
of the boundary of FTZ 160 pursuant to Section 400.27(f) of the FTZ 
Board regulations (15 CFR Part 400). The grantee is requesting 
authority to include within the zone project a jet fuel storage 
facility on a 9-acre parcel located at 1601 Tidewater Road, within the 
Port of Anchorage, area. In exchange, zone status would be relinquished 
on a parcel (16 acres) located at 459 Bluff Drive, Anchorage, which 
also contains fuel storage facilities. The purpose of the change is to 
allow Chevron U.S.A. Products Company, and possibly Texaco, Inc., to 
store on a duty/tax free basis, foreign jet fuel and foreign status (19 
CFR 146.41 and 146.42) jet fuel (produced at domestic refineries with 
subzone status) that would be used on international flights. No 
authority is requested for manufacturing or processing activity.
    Public comment on the request is invited from interested parties. 
Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at 
the address below. The closing period for their receipt is July 8, 
1996.
    A copy of the request will be available for public inspection at 
the following location: Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-
Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 3716, 14th & 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: June 5, 1996.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14739 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

feder law office, p.a.

2930 e. camelback road, suite 160

phoenix, arizona 85016

(602) 257-0135

bf@federlawpa.com

fl@federlawpa.com

Bruce Feder - State Bar No. 004832

Attorney for Defendant Scott Spear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

Scott Spear, )

)

Defendant. )

)

NO. CR18-00422 PHX SMB-003

DEFENDANT SPEAR’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE REPLY TO

GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO

DEFENDANT SPEAR’S AMENDED

MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF

RULE 17(c) SUBPOENAS

(EXPEDITED REVIEW REQUESTED)

Defendant, SCOTT SPEAR, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby

requests an extension of time to file reply to the government’s response to

Defendant’s Amended Motion for Issuance of Rule 17(c) Subpoenas, for a period of

one week. Counsel has consulted with AUSA Kevin Rapp who has no objection to

this request. The reason for this motion is Counsel needs additional time to prepare

the reply.

As such, Defendant Spear requests that this Court issue an Order extending

the reply deadline to file reply to the government’s response to Defendant’s

Amended Motion for Issuance of Rule 17(c) Subpoenas, to July 13, 2020.

Defendant does not make this motion for reason of delay but in the interest of

justice.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1034 Filed 07/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of July, 2020.

FEDER LAW OFFICE, P.A.

BY: /s/ Bruce Feder

Bruce Feder, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Scott Spear

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 6th day of July, 2020, I electronically transmitted

Defendant Scott Spear’s Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas to the Clerk of the Court

via the CM/ECF system for filing.

COPY of the foregoing emailed

this 6th day of July, 2020 to:

The Honorable Susan M. Brnovich

Brnovich_Chambers@azd.uscourts.gov

Erin E. McCampbell, emccampbell@lglaw.com

Ariel A. Neuman, aan@birdmarella.com

Paul J. Cambria, pcambria@lglaw.com

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. tbienert@bienertkatzman.com

Whitney Z. Bernstein, wbernstein@bienertkatzman.com

Gary S. Lincenberg, glincenberg@birdmarella.com

Gopi K. Panchapakesan, gpanchapakesan@birdmarella.com

Michael D. Kimerer, mdk@kimerer.com

Rhonda Elaine Neff, rneff@kimerer.com

David S. Eisenberg, david@deisenbergplc.com

Joy Malby Bertrand, Joy.Bertrand@gmail.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1034 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Kevin Rapp Kevin.Rapp@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone Andrew.Stone@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter Margaret.Perlmeter@usdoj.gov

John Kucera John.Kucera@usdoj.gov

Reginald T. Jones reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov

Peter Kozinets Peter.Kozinets@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America

By: /s/ Mali Evans

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1034 Filed 07/06/20 Page 3 of 3
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1775 Filed 09/08/23 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Keith A. BROWN, Defendant/Appellant. Keith A. BROWN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 61495, 63460.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 21, 1993.

Douglas W. Hartig, Office of the Public Defender, Clayton, Judith Larose, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Breck K. Burgess, Office of the Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1986, and kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find defendant’s claims of error are without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JON M. SANDS

Federal Public Defender

J. LEONARDO COSTALES

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Louisiana State Bar# 35721

407 W. Congress, Suite 501

Tucson, AZ 85701-1355

Telephone: (520)879-7500

Attorney for Defendant

Leo_Costales@fd.org

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States Of America,

 Plaintiff,

v.

Robert Francis Krebs,

 Defendant.

CR18-0263-TUC-JGZ (JR)

OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION, DOC. 70

Robert Francis Krebs, through undersigned counsel, respectfully objects to the 

Magistrate Court’s recommendation that Mr. Krebs be found competent to stand trial. The 

Defense is of the position that government has not met its burden of showing, by a 

preponderance of the evidence, that Mr. Krebs is competent to stand trial. The issues raised 

regarding Mr. Krebs’ potential medical conditions are severe enough to raise doubt that he 

has the capacity to assist his own defense. Mr. Kreb’s discussion with an FBI over a year 

and a half ago, R&R at p. 21, has little probative value as to his current state of mind given 

that there is a possibility he is currently suffering from a degenerative mental illness. 

Additionally, the Defense objects to the Court’s fact-finding regarding Mr. Kreb’s 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 71 Filed 07/03/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

statement. While Mr. Krebs’ statement was long, it was also at times disjointed and 

confusing. R&R at p. 24. The Defense also objects to the Court finding that Mr. Krebs was 

malingering, given the absence of a necessary factor of motivation to malinger. R&R at p. 

25. Finally, the Defense objects to the Court’s fact-finding that Mr. Krebs is competent. 

R&R at p. 25.

The Defense respectfully urges that the District Court, after conducting a de novo 

review of the record, find that Mr. Krebs is not competent to stand trial.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: July 3, 2019

JON M. SANDS 

Federal Public Defender

/s/ J. Leonardo Costales 

J. LEONARDO COSTALES

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 71 Filed 07/03/19 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Zahir Teja, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





November 15,  2010
By:
/s/  Zahir TejaZahir TejaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 787 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 28, 2009. 

Whereas metastatic breast cancer refers to Stage IV breast 

cancer when cancer cells travel from the breast, either 

through the bloodstream or the lymphatic system, to 

other parts of the body, including the bones, liver, lungs, 

or brain, and continue to grow in their new location; 

Whereas an estimated 192,370 women and 1,910 men in the 

United States will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, and 62,280 women will be diagnosed with in situ 

breast cancer; 

Whereas nearly 30 percent of women diagnosed with early 

stage breast cancer will develop Stage IV advanced or 

metastatic breast cancer; 

Whereas in developing countries, the majority of women with 

breast cancer are diagnosed with advanced stage or metastatic disease; 

Whereas the statistic that 155,000 women and men are presently living with metastatic breast cancer in the United 

States underscores the immediate need for increased public awareness; 

Whereas there currently is no cure for metastatic breast cancer, and metastatic breast cancer frequently involves try-
2 

•HRES 787 EH 

ing one treatment after another with the goal of extending the best quality of life as possible; 

Whereas scientists and researchers are conducting important 

research projects to achieve breakthroughs in metastatic 

breast cancer research; 

Whereas metastatic breast cancer is rarely discussed during 

Breast Cancer Awareness Month, however those living 

with the disease should never feel isolated or ignored; 

Whereas metastatic Breast Cancer Awareness Day emphasizes the urgent need for new, targeted breast cancer 

treatments that will provide a high quality of life and 

long life expectancy for patients by making Stage IV cancer a chronic, but not fatal disease; 

Whereas the House of Representatives is an institution that 

can raise awareness in the general public and the medical 

community of breast cancer; and 

Whereas October 13, 2009, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as National Metastatic Breast Cancer Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the designation of National Metastatic 

Breast Cancer Awareness Day; 

(2) encourages all people in the United States to 

become more informed and aware of metastatic breast 

cancer; and 
3 

•HRES 787 EH 

(3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House to 

transmit a copy of this resolution to the Metastatic 

Breast Cancer Network. 

Attest: 

Clerk.