alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    
      Exhibit
10.29

       

      100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT

       

    

    This 100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) dated this
15th
day of February 2009, is entered into by and between Dot VN, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Maker”) and Thomas Johnson (the
“Holder”).

    


    Recitals

    


    
      	
              A.

            	
              Maker
      made, executed and delivered to the order of Holder that certain 100%
      Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated August 14, 2008, in the
      principal sum of $2,160,766.52 with interest payable at the rate of 8% per
      annum, which Note is due and payable on February 15, 2009 (the “Due
      Date”).

            


    

    


    
      	
              B.

            	
              Maker
      and Holder desire to modify the terms of the Note to extend the Due
      Date.

            


    

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

    


    Agreement

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      Due Date of the Note is extended thirty days to March 17, 2009, at which
      time the entire amount of principal plus accrued interest shall be due and
      payable in full.

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              Except
      as provided herein, the terms and provisions of the Note shall remain
      unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect; the Note as modified
      and amended hereby is ratified and confirmed in all
    respects.

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              The
      terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
      of the parties hereto, their heirs, representatives, successors and
      assigns

            


    

    


    IN
WITHNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is effective as of the date first above
written.

     

    
      
        	
                “MAKER”

                Dot VN, Inc.

                 

                 

              	 	 	“HOLDER”
      

                Thomas
      Johnson

                


                


              	 
	
                /s/
      Lee Johnson

              	 	 	
                /s/
      Thomas Johnson

              	 
	
                By:
      Lee Johnson

              	 	 	
                By:
      Thomas Johnson

              	 
	
                Its:
      President
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

2AO 435

AZ Form (Rev. )

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

APPEAL CRIMINAL

NON-APPEAL CIVIL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

OTHER (6SHFLI\)

VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

OPINION OF COURT

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

SENTENCING

BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS  

PAPER COPY

3')HPDLO

$6&,,HPDLO

14 DAYS  

7 DAYSH[SHGLWHG  

DAILY

 

HOURLY

 

REALTIME

 

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025(7+$121()250$7,

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Andrew C. Stone 602-514-7500 9/22/2021

U.S. Attorney's Office

40 N. Central Ave., Ste. 1800 Phoenix AZ 85004

CR-18-422-PHX-SMB Susan M. Brnovich 9/1 - 9/14

U.S. v. Michael Lacey, et al. Phoenix AZ

✔

✔

Trial 9/1, 9/2, 9/3 (AM only),

9/9, 9/13, & 9/14

✔ ✔

andrew.stone@usdoj.gov; marjorie.dieckman@usdoj.gov

s/ Andrew C. Stone

9/22/2021

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1322 Filed 09/22/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sagamore Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended January 1, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:    May ___, 2006                          By:     ________________________
                                                Name:   Daniel Shea
                                                Title:  Chief Executive Officer



      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sagamore
Holdings, Inc. and will be retained Sagamore Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       33
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

Date:    May ___, 2006                  SAGAMORE HOLDINGS, INC.


                                        By:  ___________________________________
                                             Daniel Shea
                                             Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Acting Principal Accounting Officer




                                       34
exv4w1






Exhibit 4.1








	Thkcertiles that^ ; X> sixteen thcmsand^ “ ‘• ^without par value
pid.^h1—a; li<|iu|^!ln ‘jte^jinJC^f $i;fi|P ‘^Ra^,; 0&FW
·•^mJtiatjts;Co^oration^ an Indiana :- • -’.porporation (the :’^Gpip\)tati^’:)r
fr^^M^%Si^ Qertifigate, properly . • iend<*se4’by the b^derhereof^ij by adi^ •assigmnent-”





 









 












	‘y3A3jLVHMlSNVH3AHIVilQltl3l>B3llVlN3MONOUVmnV inOHUM ‘UVIflDUUVdAU3A3til ‘3J.V3IMVM 3HJ.
JO 30VJ 3H1 HOdCI N31J.IUM SV31WIJ 3HJ. HUM OUOdSltlHOD J.SH1V 1N3WMSISSVSIH1 J03UIUVNSIS3H1
‘30I10N A summary of the designations, relative rights, preferences and limitations applicable to
each class and series of shares of the Corporation, and of the authority of the Board of Directors
to determine variations in rights, preferences, and limitations for future series of shares, will
be furnished in writing by the Corporation to any shareholder on request and without charge. 1
(for Form 8 — K).PDF
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual Report of RiT Technologies Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Simona Green, Financial Director of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Simona Green

Simona Green

Financial Director

June 30, 2003
#### Kim BRENEMAN and Susan Evans, Appellants, v. PHILIP H. BARRON REALTY CO., Respondent.

No. 62671.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 17, 1993.

Nathan S. Cohen, St. Louis, for appellants.

Jerry R. Wilding, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tenants appeal the dismissal of their petition via summary judgment for failure of Landlord to warn the leased premises was in a flood plain and for Landlord’s failure to notify Tenants of rising flood water.

We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b).

We also determine an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we af*873firm by written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been provided.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit O 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 8
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-1 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 2 of 10 PageID #: 139 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 2 of 8
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-1 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 3 of 10 PageID #: 140 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 3 of 8
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-1 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 4 of 10 PageID #: 141 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 4 of 8
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-1 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 5 of 10 PageID #: 142 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 5 of 8
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-1 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 6 of 10 PageID #: 143 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 6 of 8
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-1 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 7 of 10 PageID #: 144 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 7 of 8
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-1 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 8 of 10 PageID #: 145 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-13 Filed 04/25/18 Page 8 of 8
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the SecuritiesExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Benjamin C. Weston,Chief Executive Officer and President of Merrill Lynch Alternative InvestmentsLLC, the manager of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  May 15, 2007               |                    |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                   |
| By                                     | /s/ BENJAMIN C.  WESTON |   |
| Benjamin C.  Weston                    |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |
|                                        |                         |  |  |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14549]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

25 CFR Part 161

RIN 1076-AC81


Navajo Partitioned Land Grazing Regulations

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Proposed Rule; reopening of comment period and additional 
request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The comment period on the Department's proposed rule to 25 
C.F.R. to govern the grazing of livestock on the Navajo Partitioned 
Land (NPL) of the Navajo-Hopi Former Joint Use Area (FJUA) of the 1882 
Executive Order reservation is reopened to provide additional 
opportunity for public comment. Comments on this issue will be 
considered along with comments on the proposed rule published in the 
Federal Register on November 1, 1995.

DATES: Comments on these proposed rules must be submitted September 9, 
1996.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Water 
and Land Resources, Mail Stop: 4559-MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20240, or telephone number (202) 208-4004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Curley, (602) 871-5151, Ext. 
5105, at the Navajo Area Office in Window Rock, Arizona.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was originally published 
in the Federal Register November 1, 1995 (60 FR 55507). The original 
comment period ended on January 2, 1996. Since the opening of the 
comment period considerable input has been received from the Navajo and 
Hopi Tribes. Due to the remoteness of the location and the inclement 
weather a large number of Tribal members have not been able to include 
their written comments. The reopening of this comment period for a 
period of 90 days will allow for maximum input from the public.

    Dated: April 8, 1996.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-14549 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
EXHIBIT
32.02








NET
TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 of Net Talk.com, Inc.  (the “Company”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Guillermo
Rodriguez


Guillermo
Rodriguez


Chief
Financial Officer


July 2,
2009
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company") for the three month ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Roger Crystal, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 9, 2011





By: /s/ Dr. Roger Crystal


Dr. Roger Crystal


Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED referring the Government’s Motion to Disqualify 

Counsel (Doc. 118) to referral judge Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade for ruling. 

 Dated this 2nd day of May, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

United States of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

1. Michael Lacey and 

2. James Larkin, 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL

ORDER OF REFERRAL 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 129 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bruce Woodruff KURT, Appellant.

No. 63084.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 17, 1993.

Bruce Woodruff Kurt, pro se.

Kellee A. Koncki, Asst. Cir. Atty., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals pro *se*his conviction for driving while license suspended in violation of § 302.321. We first note Defendant’s brief fails to conform to Rule 30.06. He failed to include a “fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented ...” Rule 30.06(c). In addition, his points relied on and argument do not conform to Rule 30.06(d) and (e); *See, Thummel v. King,*570 S.W.2d 679 (Mo. banc 1978).

We do, however, consider Defendant’s contention the information filed in his case is insufficient to charge him with a violation of § 302.321, because it does not allege he was traveling upon a highway. Defendant was issued a Missouri Uniform Complaint and Summons, which stated the alleged offense occurred at 2736 Winnebago.

Defendant relies on *State v. Prock,*759 S.W.2d 854 (Mo.App.1988), and *State v. Wren,*622 S.W.2d 31 (Mo.App.1981). However, these cases are inapplicable where Defendant has failed to timely raise the issue pursuant to Rule 24.04(b) or demonstrate actual prejudice. *State v. King,*851 S.W.2d 800, 801[1] (Mo.App.1993) (information failing to allege moving violation occurred upon a highway sufficient absent prejudice to the defendant); *See also, State v. Parkhurst,*845 S.W.2d 31, 35[7-9] (Mo. banc 1992) (“the rule that essential statutory elements may not be supplied by intendment or implication has no application where the issue is not timely raised pursuant to Rule 24.04(b).”) The record before us does not indicate Defendant raised the alleged defect in the information before the trial court as required by Rule 24.04(b). Further, Defendant alleges no prejudice in his brief. Therefore, we find no merit to Defendant’s contention.

Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15039]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 152

[OPP-250117; FRL-5372-9]


Notification Procedures for Pesticide Registration Modifications; 
Notification to the Secretary of Agriculture

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notification to the Secretary of Agriculture.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that the Administrator of EPA has forwarded to 
the Secretary of Agriculture a final regulation under section 25(a) of 
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The 
rule amends EPA's notification and non-notification procedures for 
certain registration modifications. This action is required by FIFRA 
section 25(a)(2).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Kempter, Registration Division 
(7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office location, telephone 
number, and e-mail address: Rm. 713, CM#2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
Arlington, VA 22202, Telephone: 703-305-5448, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5cec0c8d5d1c0d78bc6c4d7c9d1cacbe5c0d5c4c8c4ccc98bc0d5c48bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c0709011c18091e420f0d1e001803022c091c0d010d050042091c0d420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 25(a)(2) of FIFRA provides that the 
Administrator shall provide the Secretary of Agriculture with a copy of 
any final regulation at least 30 days before signing it for publication 
in the Federal Register. If the Secretary comments in writing regarding 
the final regulation within 15 days after receiving it, the 
Administrator shall issue for publication in the Federal Register, with 
the final regulation, the comments of the Secretary, if requested by 
the Secretary, and the response of the Administrator concerning the 
Secretary's comments. If the Secretary does not comment in writing 
within 15 days after receiving the final regulation, the Administrator 
may sign the regulation for publication in the Federal Register anytime 
thereafter. As required by FIFRA section 25(a)(3), a copy of the final 
regulation has been forwarded to the Committee on Agriculture of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 
and Forestry of the Senate.

List of Subjects in Part 152

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: May 24, 1996.
Daniel M. Barolo,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 96-15039 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Howe *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 22970

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*Mr. Arthur Krause,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. D. D. Porter,*prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

*655It is ordered, and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkape, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL LACEY, et al., 

 Defendants.

NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

ORDER

Upon Defendant Andrew Padilla’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for 

Filing Responses to Government’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel, and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Extending the otherwise applicable time for filing all Defendants’ responses to 

the government’s motion to disqualify counsel for fourteen (14) days and the responses 

will be due on or before May 23, 2018.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 130-1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 1