alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         Each of the undersigned officers of TriPath Imaging, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 15, 2004                       /s/ Paul R. Sohmer
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Paul R. Sohmer, M.D.
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 15, 2004                       /s/ Stephen P. Hall
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Stephen P. Hall
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael E. TAYLOR, Defendant/Appellant. Michael E. TAYLOR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 68179, 70011.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Oct. 8, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*483Before AHRENS, C.J., CRANDALL, J„ and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael E. Taylor, appeals the judgment entered on his convictions for attempted forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo Supp.1993, forcible sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo Supp.1993, two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, and burglary in the first degree, § 569.160, RSMo 1994. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. These appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15®. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Liam O’Grady, Dist rict Judge for the U.S. District Court for Eastern Virginia, Alexandria, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FORREST M. RICHARDSON, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. JAMES YATES, Respondent - Appellee. No. 10-15974D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02964-FCDEFB
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Frank C. Damrell, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 9, 2011 San Francisco, California Before: HUG and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and O’GRADY, ** District Judge. 

# FILED
JUN 01 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS1 We grant the Petitioner’s motion to take judicial notice of the docket and record in Forrest M. Richardson v. D.K. Sisto, Warden, et. al. , No. 2:10-CV00025-GEB-EFB. 2 California state prisoner Forrest M. Richardson 1 (“Richardson”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S .C. § 2253, and we affirm. A challenge to a condition of imprisonmen t, as opposed to a challenge to the fact or duration of imprisonment, is not a cognizable habeas claim. Ramirez v. Galaza , 334 F.3d 850, 859 (9th Cir. 2003). Richardson contends that the prison officials’ 2007 disciplinary finding for violating prison conduct rules will affect the duration of his imprisonment because it might be viewed disfavorably by the Bo ard of Parole Hearings and decrease his chance of a favorable parole decision. These potential consequences of his misconduct violation are too speculative to establish habeas corpus jurisdiction. See Wilkinson v. Dotson , 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005) (holding that habeas jurisdiction did not exist for claims seeking relief that would invalidate state procedures used to deny eligibility and suitability for parole); Ramirez , 334 F.3d at 859 (stating that “habeas jurisdiction is absent, and a § 1983 action proper, where a successful challenge to a prison condition will notnecessarily shorten the prisoner’s sentence.”); cf. Docken v. Chase , 393 F.3d 1024, 1031 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that3 claim regarding frequency of parole re view was cognizable in habeas). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Richardson’s habeas petition. Finally, relying on Heck v. Humphrey , Richardson argues that before he can properly pursue a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, he must first expunge the disciplinary conviction at issue. 512 U.S. 477 (1994). As the State conceded at argument, because Richardson’s misconduct conviction did not affect the length of his confinement, he may pursue a § 1983 action without first complying with the rule in Heck
. See Ramirez , 334 F.3d at 858. We agree, and conclude that Richardson is not barred from pursuing his § 1983 action noted above. AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

                         CERTIFICATION

I, Adam Cegielski, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Uranium Hunter Corporation;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely
affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.

Dated: May 14, 2007              By: /s/ Adam Cegielski
                                     Adam Cegielski,
                                     President  and Chief Executive
                                     Officer
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aussie Soles Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  April 14, 2008


/s/ Craig Taplin
-------------------------------------------
Craig Taplin, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                April 30, 2008 |                          /s/ Jana Whitlock                                             |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Jana                Whitlock, President, CEO,CFO,                Treasurer and Director(Principal                Financial Officer) |

----
#### Elsie EST, Appellant, v. APTED-HULLING, INC., Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as custodian of the Second Injury Fund.

No. 65337.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 9, 1994.

Ray B. Marglous, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeffrey Estes, William R. Gallagher, St. Louis, for respondent.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Vicky L. Anthony, Asst. Atty. Gen., Cape Girardeau, for Second Injury Fund.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Elsie Est, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision finding appellant not permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Commission’s finding pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for the decision.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Neev Nissenson, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





November 15,  2010
By:
/s/  Neev NissensonNeev NissensonChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cytta Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2010 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Stephen  Spalding,
Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Stephen Spalding
--------------------------------------------
Name: Stephen Spalding
Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Date: July 27th, 2010
Exhibit
23
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-66049, 333-38887, and 333-109894 on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 28,
2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Riverview Bancorp,
Inc. and Subsidiary, and the effectiveness of Riverview Bancorp, Inc.'s internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Riverview Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended March 31,
2010.
 
 
 /s/Deloitte
& Touche LLP
 
 Portland,
Oregon
 May 28,
2010




106
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2814

BARBARA HOFFMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL HOFFMAN; JOSEPH ROUSE; STATE OF MARYLAND; ASSIGNMENT OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT, ANNE

ARUNDEL COUNTY; KERRY ANDERSON; DAVID BOWERS;

GALE ANN BELUCCI; RICHARD BACHARACH, M.D.;

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; GINGER HOWARD;

INGRID HOFFMAN; SUE HOUSER; PAM ZIOLKOWSKI;

BERNIE DIVVER; EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; TRACEY AGNEW;

KRYSTLE HOFFMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-

3541-AMD)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her

complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), as amended by

Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110

Stat. 1321. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Hoffman v. Hoffman, No. CA-96-

3541-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: October 12, 2016   /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1 and 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Plandai Biotechnology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, qualified by (i) the Explanatory Statement above, (ii)
the Declaration of Tad Mailander filed with this report, and (iii) the registrant’s certifications published with OTC Markets on
April 12, 2017, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 20,
2023



|/s/
Tad Mailander             | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Tad Mailander, President      | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) | 



March 20,
2023



|/s/
Tad Mailander                            | 
|-------------------------------------------- | 
|Tad Mailander, Chief Financial
Officer       | 
|(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
<PAGE>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Horizon Organic Holding Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-37864 and 333-64905) on Form S-8 of Horizon Organic Holding
Corporation of our report dated February 6, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Horizon Organic Holding Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in
the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Horizon Organic Holding
Corporation.


                                        KPMG LLP


Boulder, Colorado
March 16, 2001
Employment Agreement with Carole R. Wright



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT is made effective this 1st day of January, 2009, to that certain Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) with an effective
date of October 17, 2007 between UTEK Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“UTEK”), and CAROLE WRIGHT(“Employee”), and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify paragraph 4 (a) entitled “COMPENSATION” and to add Paragraph 4 (e) of the Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Amendment according to the terms set forth herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants herein set forth, it is agreed as follows: 
 1. Paragraph 4(a) is
modified as follows: 
 a. Employee shall be paid a salary of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars for the balance of the term of this Agreement.

 2. Paragraph 4 (e) is being added to read as follows: 
 e. Employee shall be granted 50,000 stock options to be priced at the closing market price on the first day of the open trading window, following the commencement Date of this Agreement, according to the terms of
UTEK’s employee stock option program. 
 3. Except as modified and amended hereto, the parties ratify and confirm all of the terms and provisions of the
said Agreement. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this agreement as of the 16th day of February, 2009. 

 

			
	UTEK CORPORATION
	
	 /S/ Doug Schaedler

	By:	 	Doug Schaedler, President
	
	EMPLOYEE
	
	 /S/ Carole Wright

	By:	 	Carole Wright.
Exhibit 32.2

JMP Group Inc.

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas B. Kilian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                         
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: June 21, 2007 |  | /s/ Thomas B. Kilian                    
|                    |  | Thomas B. Kilian Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.