alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 13a-14(a)

|I, Kent M. Harvey, certify that:
|--------------------------------
|                                
|1.                              
|                                
|2.                              
|                                
|3.                              
|                                
|4.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|5.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                

|                      
|----------------------
|Date: March 10, 2004  
|                      
|                      
|/s/ Kent M. Harvey    
|                      
|Kent M. Harvey        
|Chairman and President
|PG&E Funding LLC      



Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 13a-14(a)

|I, Michael J. Donnelly, certify that:
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|1.                                   
|                                     
|2.                                   
|                                     
|3.                                   
|                                     
|4.                                   
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|5.                                   
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     



|Date:  March 10, 2004  
|-----------------------
|                       
|                       
|/s/ Michael J. Donnelly
|                       
|Michael J. Donnelly    
|Treasurer              
|PG&E Funding LLC
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin W Glass,

Plaintiff,

v. 

AsicNorth Incorporated,

Defendant.

NO. CV-18-00898-PHX-DLR

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came for consideration before the Court. The 

issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court’s Order filed

November 20, 2019, which granted the Motion for Summary Judgment, judgment is 

entered in favor of defendant ASIC North and against plaintiff. Plaintiff to take nothing,

and the case is terminated.

Brian D. Karth

District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

November 20, 2019

s/ Michelle Sanders

By Deputy Clerk

Case 2:18-cv-00898-DLR Document 58 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 1
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed August 30, 2013 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01133-CV No. 05-13-01134-CV IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator On Appeal from the Crimin al District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. W10-01183-J, W10-01184-J 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Opinion by Justice FitzGerald The Court has before it relator’s “Order for Hearing to Show Proof of Fraud, Tampering with Government Documents and Illegal Convictions .” We treat this document as a petition for writ of mandamus. The facts and issues are well known to the par ties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario , 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist. , 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (o rig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator = s petition for writ of mandamus.

131133F.P05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of J-Kan, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of J-Kan, Inc. for the period ended April 30, 2008. The undersigned certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of J-Kan, Inc. as of April 30, 2008. This Certification is executed as of July 14, 2008. By: /s/ JERRY W. NEEL, JR. Jerry W. Neel, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  By: /s/ JERRY W. NEEL, JR. Jerry W. Neel, Jr. Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to J-Kan, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 88 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 88

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 27, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1) making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and 
creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance 
to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed three and one half hours 
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations, who may yield control of blocks of that time. After 
general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No further 
consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent 
order of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the IOMED, Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian L. Mower, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: September 15, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/BRIAN L. MOWER, CPABrian L. Mower, CPA
Chief Accounting Officer
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IOMED, Inc. and will be retained by IOMED, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



QuickLinks
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE PARRA-TEJEDA, a.k.a. Jose ParraTejada,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30134

D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00112-TOR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Thomas O. Rice, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2016** 

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Parra-Tejeda appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an

FILED

JUN 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Parra-Tejeda contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in

light of the mitigating factors and the 12-level enhancement he received under

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). The district court did not abuse its discretion in

imposing Parra-Tejeda’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51

(2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Parra-Tejeda’s criminal history and his failure to be deterred by a prior

33-month sentence for the same offense. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; see also United

States v. Ruiz-Chairez, 493 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir. 2007) (rejecting empirical

challenge to section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)). Moreover, contrary to Parra-Tejeda’s

contention, the record reflects that the district court considered his arguments for a

lower sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en

banc).

AFFIRMED. 

2 15-30134
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

h0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146159 & (21)(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146159

COA: 309508

Wayne CC: 06-014443-FC

CAROL ANN POOLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion for appointment of counsel and motion to remand are DENIED.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

American Muslims for Palestine, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Arizona State University, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00670-PHX-JJT 

ORDER 

 At issue is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Hearing (Doc. 10) to which Defendants’ filed a 

Response (Doc. 17). 

 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file any reply to Defendants’ Response 

(Doc. 17) by 3:00 pm Arizona time Friday, March 16, 2018. 

 Dated this 15th day of March, 2018. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi 

United States District Judge
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1225 Filed 08/09/21 Page 12 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

 Petitioner Hayman Sabir has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). The Honorable Eileen S. Willett, United States Magistrate 

Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 25), recommending that the 

Court deny the Petition. Judge Willett advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days 

to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered 

a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. 25) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th 

Cir. 2003)). 

 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is wellHayman Sabir, 

 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

Enrique M. Lucero, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-17-04766-PHX-SPL

ORDER 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 

findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The 

district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further 

evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Magistrate Judge Willett’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is 

accepted and adopted by the Court; 

2. That the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice; and 

3. That the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. 

Dated this 8th day of August, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF XCELLINK INTERNATIONAL INC.

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Xcellink International Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the undersigned, Mark Fingarson, President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial officer, of Xcellink International Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act            of 2002, that:

 

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Xcellink International Inc..

 

| Date: August 24, 2009 | /s/ Mark Fingarson |
|-----------------------|--------------------|

 

|   | Mark Fingarson                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer, |
|   | and Principal Financial Officer        |
|   |                                   |
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of C.H., a child. )

________________________________ )

)

K.C., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-1193

)

LUTHERAN SERVICES FLORIDA, )

INC., a Florida corporation; )

CHILDREN'S NETWORK OF )

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida )

corporation; FLORIDA DEPARTMENT )

OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, an )

agency of the State of Florida; and )

OPERATION PAR, INC., )

)

Appellees. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 18, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee

County; Robert J. Branning, Judge.

Stacie J. Schmerling and Howard M.

Talenfeld of Talenfeld Law, Fort

Lauderdale; Michael A. Bernstein of

Michael A. Bernstein, P.A., Fort

Lauderdale; and Richard A. Filson of

Filson & Penge, P.A., Sarasota, for

Appellant.
- 2 -

Kayla A. Riera-Gomez of Wilson, Elser,

Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Miami,

and Andrew W. Feldman of Klein Glasser

Park & Lowe, P.L., Miami, for Appellee

Lutheran Services Florida, Inc.

Eric J. Netcher of Dean, Ringers,

Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Orlando, and

Joshua B. Walker of Walker, Revels,

Greninger & Netcher, PLLC, Orlando,

for Appellee Children's Network of

Southwest Florida, LLC.

Julie C. Ireland and AnnMarie G. Flores

of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Fort Myers,

for appellee Operation Par, Inc.

No appearance for appellee Department of

Children Families. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131521 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131521 COA: 269557 Wexford CC: 05-007500-FC MARY LYNN COFFEL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 25, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Daniel
      Motsinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Atlas Oil and Gas, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
      30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Atlas Oil and Gas, Inc.





By:
                /s/ Daniel MotsingerName:
                Daniel MotsingerTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer andChief
                Financial OfficerDated:
                November 14, 2008
|EXHIBIT 21
|----------

PMA Capital Corporation
Significant Subsidiaries of Registrant
As of December 31, 2003

PMA Capital Corporation (Pennsylvania)

     PMA Capital Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)

          Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)

          Pennsylvania Manufacturers Indemnity Company (Pennsylvania)

          Manufacturers Alliance Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)

          PMA Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)

               Pennsylvania Manufacturers' International Insurance Ltd. (Bermuda)

     Mid-Atlantic States Investment Company (Delaware)

          PMA Holdings, Cayman Ltd. (Cayman)

          High Mountain Reinsurance, Ltd. (Cayman)

          PMA Insurance SPC, Cayman (Cayman)

     PMA Re Management Company (Pennsylvania)

     PMA Management Corp. (Pennsylvania)

     PMA Services Incorporated (Pennsylvania)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard M. Lerner, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 25, 2010



/s/ Richard M. LernerRichard M. LernerChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7581

WAYNE BOYD,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

MARIE VARGO, Warden, Sussex II State Prison,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:12-cv-01501-LO-IDD)

Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 11, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED