alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Multicanal S.A., asociedad anónima(stock corporation) (the "Company"), does here certify, to the best of
such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
June 17, 2005

| | /s/ Carlos Alberto MoltiniTitle:  Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Multicanal S.A. and will be retained by Multicanal S.A. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kenneth JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant. Kenneth JORDAN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Nos. 67671, 69735.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 27, 1996.

David L. Simpson, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, David G. Brown, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to two concurrent terms of twenty-five years’ imprisonment. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Order entered August 11, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01406
- CV CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant
V. EAST VILLAGE ASSOCIA TION, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 07239 

### O RDER ON P. MICHAEL JUNG’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE EAST VILLAGE ASSOCIATION Before the Court is P. Michael Jung’s unopposed motion to withdraw as co

- counsel of record for Appellee East Village Association (“EVA”). Mr. Jung seeks to withdraw as co

counsel for EVA due to a conflict created by his nomination for a position on the Da llas City Plan & Zoning Commission. We hereby grant Mr. Jung’s motion to withdraw as co

- counsel for EVA. We direct the Clerk of the Court to remove Mr. Jung as counsel for EVA and designate co

- counsel Anthony Ricciardelli, Esq. of Kizzia Johnson PLL C as lead counsel for EVA

. /s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I,
Stephen Spalding, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cytta
Corp. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have; (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.  Date:
 August 19, 2009 /s/
Stephen Spalding Stephen
Spalding Principal
Executive and Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don A. Turkleson, Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                               
|/s/    Don A.
Turkleson                                                                                                        
|Don A. Turkleson Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

Date: November 6, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-31225

JOHN H. JONES,

Plaintiff−Appellant,

versus

CHAD MENZINA, Assistant Warden; PERRY DIXON, Major; 

NATHANIEL JOHNSON, Lieutenant; TIM NEWBY, Sergeant,

Defendants−Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:13-CV-182

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Jones, Louisiana prisoner # 313554, moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his appeal of the dismissal, as legally frivolous and 

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, of his 42 U.S.C. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 28, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-31225 Document: 00512644692 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2014
No. 13-31225

§ 1983 complaint. By moving for IFP status, Jones is challenging the district 

court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. 

Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a). Jones’s brief 

on appeal makes only a conclusionary assertion that his claims have merit and 

does not address the district court’s reasons for its certification, which included 

thorough consideration of his claims by way of adoption of the magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. Accordingly, 

Jones’s challenge to the certification is deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. 

Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Jones has not shown that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on 

their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 

(5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Therefore, the 

motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of the complaint as frivolous in the district court and the 

dismissal of the appeal count as strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See 

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Jones previously 

accrued two strikes. See Jones v. West Baton Rouge Parish, 436 F. App’x 319, 

320 (5th Cir. 2011). Because he has now accumulated four strikes, he is 

BARRED from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is 

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is “under imminent danger 

of serious physical injury.” § 1915(g). We caution Jones that any additional 

frivolous appeals will invite the imposition of sanctions.

2

 Case: 13-31225 Document: 00512644692 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/28/2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 21, 2009 

d1014 

Order 

 

October 21, 2009 

136666 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136666 

 COA: 283778 

Allegan CC: 05-014491-FH 

KENT ALLEN LEE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
Exhibit
      32.1






CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Card Activation Technologies, Inc.
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      William P. Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






Registrant
            Card
                Activation Technologies, Inc.Date:
                February 12, 2008
            By:
                /s/ William P. WilliamsWilliam
                P. WilliamsChairman,
                President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive
                Officer)





17
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30104-30105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15184]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
June 17, 1996.
    A closed meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 19, 1996, at 10:00 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(i) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Wallman, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
June 19, 1996, at 10:00 a.m., will be:

    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.
    Institution and settlement of an injunctive action.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.


[[Page 30105]]


    Dated: June 11, 1996.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15184 Filed 6-11-96; 2:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
EXHIBIT 15  Randall N. Drake, C.P.A., P.A.  1981 Promenade Way Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 536-4863     Acknowledgement of the use of a report on unaudited interim financial information.  We have reviewed, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the unaudited interim financial information of J-Kan, Inc. and subsidiary as of April 30, 2008 and for the three-month and nine-month periods ending April 30, 2008 and 2007, and have issued our report thereon dated July 11, 2008.  With respect to the Form 10-Q of J-Kan, Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of said report. As indicated in such report, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that unaudited information. We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.   Randall N. Drake, CPA, PA Randall N. Drake, CPA, PA  Clearwater, Florida  July 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 32





DUSSAULT APPAREL INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dussault Apparel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason Dussault, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 22, 2011
By:
/s/Jason DussaultName:
Jason DussaultTitle:
Principal Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Yak O. Garang, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting 

Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration, 

Defendant. 

No. CV 18-134-TUC-FRZ 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff Yak O. Garang brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 

383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social 

Security (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff an award of disability benefits. 

The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Linnette C. Kimmins for all pretrial 

proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United 

States District Court for the District of Arizona, Local Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 Magistrate Judge Kimmins, after a thorough review of the record, issued her Report 

and Recommendation, recommending that the District Court remand this matter for the 

award of benefits, based the finding that there was no serious doubt as to whether Plaintiff 

is disabled. 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The Report and Recommendation provides an in-depth review − and discussion of 

the Commissioner’s findings and the evidence presented to the Administrative Law Judge 

− under the applicable standard of review. 

 Upon an independent review of the Report and Recommendation, the pleadings, and 

the administrative record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ findings. 

 The Report and Recommendation set forth that any party may serve and file written 

objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. 

No objections were filed. 

 Based on the foregoing, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is hereby 

ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court; 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Commissioner 

for an award of benefits; 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment 

accordingly. 

 Dated this 28th day of May, 2019.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60101

Conference Calendar

__________________

FEREYDOUN ZARE MONTANAGH,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A23-441-017

- - - - - - - - - -

December 21, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Iranian citizen Fereydoun Zare Montanagh appeals the Board

of Immigration Appeals's (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen his

deportation proceedings to seek asylum or for reconsideration of

the BIA's earlier denial of his request for a waiver from

deportation. Montanagh contends that he has a constitutional

right to a closed asylum hearing; that the immigration judge

declined to assure him that the Iranian government would not be
No. 95-60101

-2-

told about any asylum application; that the BIA erred by

dismissing his fear of persecution without hearing evidence of

that fear; and that his well-founded fear of persecution merits a

grant of asylum. We have reviewed the record and the BIA's

opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny

the petition for review.

PETITION DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ J. Eric PikeJ. Eric PikeChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentFebruary 6, 2008 /s/ Anthony K. SlaterAnthony K. SlaterChief Financial OfficerFebruary 6, 2008