alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Meg A. Gentle, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.







Date: May 10, 2013


/s/ MEG A. GENTLEMeg A. GentleChief Financial Officer ofCheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner ofCheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
EXHIBIT 8.1

                   List of the Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                         Country of                  Interest
Subsidiary                             Incorporation                Ownership
----------                             -------------                ---------

Euro909.dk A/S                            Denmark                     100.0%
EuroTrust PKI Services A/S                Denmark                     100.0%
EuroTrust Net Vaulting A/S                Denmark                     100.0%
EuroTrust Virus112 A/S                    Denmark                     100.0%
Euro909Media A/S (dk4)                    Denmark                      85.0%
EuroTrust Secure Hosting A/S              Denmark                      75.0%
EuroTrust Realtime Security A/S           Denmark                      85.3%
EuroTrust Sweden AB                        Sweden                      70.0%
Telefax Scandinavia i Sverige AB           Sweden                     100.0%
EuroTrust E-Security SARL               Switzerland                   100.0%
EuroTrust France SAS                       France                     100.0%
#### Ronald DEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56102.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 10, 1990.

Raymond L. Legg, Robert R. Turley, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate sentence We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: October 12, 2016  /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick C. Bartlett Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Amendment No. 1 to 2008 URIGP



 Exhibit 10(F)(2) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 2008
RESTATEMENT 
 OF 
 XEROX CORPORATION 

 UNFUNDED RETIREMENT INCOME GUARANTEE PLAN 
 W
I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, Xerox Corporation (the “Employer”) has established the Xerox Corporation Unfunded Retirement Income Guarantee
Plan, which is presently set forth in the “2008 Restatement of Xerox Corporation Unfunded Retirement Income Guarantee Plan” (the “Plan”), and 
 WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan, 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. The last paragraph of Section 4.2 (relating to lump sum payouts of small distributions) shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “Notwithstanding the above, if the lump sum actuarial equivalent of any benefit otherwise payable as a monthly amount is $20,000 or less,
determined as of the date of termination with respect to the date the benefit is scheduled to commence, then (i) for a participant who terminates after 2008, such benefit will be distributed as a lump sum six months after the date of
termination, and (ii) for a participant who terminates after 2004 and before 2009, such benefit will be distributed on July 1, 2009.” 
 This Amendment is effective as of this restatement of the Plan. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed as of this 17th day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	XEROX CORPORATION
		
	By	 	 /s/    PATRICIA M.
NAZEMETZ        

		 	Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30616-30617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15313]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30617]]


FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3641]


WLAR Co., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a 
Virginia-based corporation and its officer from making unsubstantiated 
representations for their weight-loss booklets, products or program. 
The consent order requires the respondents to provide, in future 
advertisements, a disclosure statement that the products consist solely 
of a booklet or pamphlet containing information and advice on weight-
loss.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued February 21, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Cleland, FTC/S-4002, Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, June 21, 1995, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 60 FR 32324, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of WLAR Co., et al., for the 
purpose of soliciting public comment. Interest parties were given sixty 
(60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order.
    Comments were filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered an order to cease and desist, as set forth in the proposed 
consent agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

    Authority: Sec. 6, 38 stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or 
applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15313 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.12






January
25, 2007





Bob
Fugerer


4819 Sky
blue Drive


Lutz,
FL  33558





Re:      Amendment
to Executive Employment Agreement





Dear
John:





This
document is intended to memorialize the amendment of your Employment
Agreement, dated July 10, 2006.





Our
signatures below confirm that we have agreed to modify the Employment
Agreement in Sections 1 and 4 (a) and 4(b) only as described below as
follows:





1.       EMPLOYMENT;
DUTIES.





The
provision, as originally written has been deleted in its entirety and is amended
to read as follows:





The
Company shall employ Executive as President and Chief Technological Officer, and
Executive accepts such employment under the terms and conditions set forth in
this Agreement. Executive’s duties shall be consistent with those of such a
position as defined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors (the
“Board”) and the Chief Executive Officer.





4.
            COMPENSATION
      AND BENEFITS





(a)
            Base
      Salary





The
provision, as originally written has been deleted in its entirety and is amended
to read as follows:





Executive’s
Base Salary shall be, effective January 1, 2007, in the amount of $150,000 per
year. Executive’s base salary shall be reviewed annually in conjunction with
Executive’s annual performance review and may be adjusted as appropriate in
light of Executive’s performance. Executive’s annual base salary shall be paid
in accordance with the standard payroll practices of the Company.





(b)
            Incentive
      compensation.





The
provision, as originally written has been deleted in its entirety and is amended
to read as follows:





i.
            The
      Company shall pay the executive a one time signing bonus of sixty thousand
      dollars ($60,000) plus two million shares of the common stock of the
      Company.


ii.
            A
      quarterly payment of five hundred thousand (500,000) shares of restricted
      common stock of the company.





Executive
acknowledges that the signing bonus in Section 4(b) (i) was paid in full during
2006.







(signature
page follows)













APPROVED
      AND AGREED:
              Bob
      FugererDATE:






Sun
      Energy Solar, Inc.DATE:
              By:
              /s/Carl
      L. SmithChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David M. Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended February 28, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 13, 2011
By:
/s/ David M. MorseName: David M. Morse

Title: Co-President and Chief Executive Officer





I, Desiree Mejia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report of Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended February 28, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 13, 2011
By:
/s/ Desiree MejiaName: Desiree Mejia

Title: Chief Operating Officer, Principal Financial

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
oOo IN DH PF WN —

RP NNN NY NNN HK S&B ee ee ee ee
eX AAP HNH KF SOMO A DUA PR WN KH S

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, No. 18-00105MJ-001-PHX-MHB
Plaintiff, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ORDER
MODIFYING CONDITIONS OF
v. PRETRIAL RELEASE
Douglas Haig,
Defendant.

IT IS ORDERED modifying the Order Setting Conditions of Release dated
February 2, 2018 as follows:

Rha Defendant shall remove all gun powder from his residence.

Dy. Any ammunition canisters shall be left open during visits by US Pretrial
Services Officers.

ws, efendant shall remove any blank ammunition from his residence.

DPR etn shall remove all ammunition from his residence. Ammunition is
defined, for purposes of this Order, in 18 U.S.C. § 921(17)(A), as “ammunition or
cartridge cases, primers, bullets, or propellant powder designed for use in any

firearm.”

DATED: Ys, LG 1B

PRA iby

Douglas#iai:
Defendant &
**Exhibit
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc.
      ("the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
      Teja N. Shariff, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully
      comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
      /s/Teja N. Shariff____________________


Teja
      N.
      Shariff, Chief Financial Officer





Dated:
      August 24, 2007
H. Res. 658 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 17, 2009. 

Resolved, That on such date as the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives may designate, official photographs of the 

House may be taken while the House is in actual session. 

Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, and 

distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: October 16, 2013  /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

American Muslims for Palestine, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Arizona State University, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00670-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Civil Procedure 

apply to all proceedings in this case. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, you must serve each Defendant in your case with the Summons and 

Complaint within 90 days from the date the Complaint is filed, unless you obtain a 

waiver of service pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). If, for good reason, 

you cannot serve your Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days, you may, 

prior to the expiration of the 90-day period, file with the Court a request for an extension 

of time in which to serve your Summons and Complaint. In that request, you should set 

forth the reason why you have not accomplished service and request a specific short 

period of time in which to accomplish such service on any Defendant. If the Court 

believes your reason constitutes “good cause” it will authorize a brief additional period in 

which you can then serve the Defendant. 

 If you do not obtain an extension and any Defendant named in your Complaint is 

not served within 90 days, the Court is obliged, after notice to you, to dismiss the 

Case 2:18-cv-00670-JJT Document 8 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Complaint without prejudice (meaning that your Complaint is dismissed but you may 

refile the Complaint in a new action if you wish to do so). 

The only way that the Court knows that you have served the Defendant is that, the 

person who serves the Defendant with the Summons and Complaint is required, 

according to the rules, to file an affidavit with the Court which proves that the Defendant 

was served in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). Therefore, you need to be sure that, 

prior to 90 days from the date on which you filed your Complaint, whoever serves the 

Summons and Complaint on each Defendant files an affidavit with this Court 

demonstrating that they accomplished proper service. 

THIS CONSTITUTES YOUR NOTICE UNDER RULE 4(m) THAT 

IF YOU HAVE NOT APPROPRIATELY SERVED ANY 

DEFENDANT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM THE FILING OF YOUR 

COMPLAINT THAT DEFENDANT WILL BE DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FROM YOUR LAWSUIT. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all

Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the 

time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on May 31, 2018. 

 Dated this 2nd day of March, 2018. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00670-JJT Document 8 Filed 03/02/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Simon Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 19, 2011   /s/ Simon Thomas Simon Thomas Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Appeal Notice of Assignment CAUSE NO. 73810

THE STATE OF TEXAS 149th District Court

vs of JOSHUA EUGENE PLASTER Brazoria County, Texas

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT ON APPEAL

ON THE 17th day of June, 2015, the defendant in t he above styled and numbered cause

excepted to the order of the Court in said cause an d gave Notice of Appeal to the Court of

Appeals, Fourteenth Judicial District.

Date of Judgment or Other Order Appealed From: 5/20 /15

Date of Sentencing: 5/20/15

Name of Trial Court Judge: Terri Holder

Name of Court Reporter: Robin Rios

Name and Address of Defense Attorney on Appeal: Keith G. Allen, (Appointed) 2360 CR 94, Suite 106 Pearland, Texas 77584

Name and Address of Attorney for the State on Appea l: Jeri Yenne, District Attorney Brazoria County Courthouse 111 East Locust, Suite 408-A Angleton, TX 77515

Defendant Incarcerated? Yes

Motion for New Trial Filed? 6/17/15

Appeal Bond: No Date N/A

Offense and Punishment: Aggravated Robbery; Fifteen (15) years - TDCJ-ID

RHONDA BARCHAK, District Clerk

By /S/ Kathleen McDougald, Deputy
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. ROBIN LIPSKI 

v. JERRY BURKES

Circuit Court for Greene County

No. 10CV575

No. E2012-01355-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 1, 2012

The order from which the appellant, Jerry Burkes, seeks to appeal was entered on Monday,

October 24, 2011. A notice of appeal was filed by the appellant on Monday, November 28,

2011, the 35th day following the entry of the trial court’s order. Because the notice of appeal

was not filed timely, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, this

appeal is dismissed.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, P.J., and JOHN W. MCCLARTY, J.

Jerry Burkes, Greeneville, Tennessee, Pro Se Appellant.

Linda Thomas Woolsey, Greeneville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Robin Lipski.

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter, and Lindsey O. Appiah, Assistant

Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

1

Our jurisdiction of a Tenn. R. App. P. 3 appeal as of right is dependent upon

the timely filing of a notice of appeal. Albert v. Frye, 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004).

In the instant case, the day the relevant order was entered, i.e., October 24, 2011, is not

counted in determining the last day of the 30-day period of time for filing of a notice of

appeal. See Tenn. R. App. P. 21(a). Therefore, there were 7 days left in October and 23 days

in November within which the Appellant could file his notice. Hence, the last day the notice

could be timely filed was Wednesday, November 23, 2011. It follows that the notice of

appeal filed November 28, 2011, was not timely filed. We have no jurisdiction to hear the

appellant’s appeal.

The appeal of Jerry Burkes is dismissed with costs on appeal taxed to him.

PER CURIAM

Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides: “This Court, with the concurrence of all judges

1

participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a

formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated

‘MEMORANDUM OPINION,’ shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated

case.”

-2-