alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
  
  Employment Agreement Company
 A)
    
    Section 1.1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:
  B)
    
    Section 1.2 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:
  C)
    
    Section 2.3 is amended by deleting the following language beginning on the
fourth line thereof:




---



##### 



D)
    
    Any notices to be delivered to the Company pursuant to Section 10.3 shall be
sent as follows:
 
   ATMI, INC.By:Name:Title:  
 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

Nos. 15

- 1475, 15

- 1569 and 15

- 1570

________________

MARK A. JACKSON

v.

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY; ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY;

ROHM AND HAAS CO BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE;

LIBERTY MU TUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; RAJ L. GUPTA; PIERRE

R. BRONDEAU; JACQUES M. CROISETTIERE; ROBERT A. LONERGAN,

ESQUIRE; JANE GREENETZ; DEANNA MAY; CYNTHIA MAZER; RICHARD

QUINLAN ESQUIRE; SEAN B. MCSWEENEY ESQUIRE; MICHAEL MILLER,

ESQUIRE; NANCY MAYO; LORI HAMLIN; JOHN DOE NOS. 1

- 15

Mark A. Jackson,

Appellant in No. 15

- 1475

Dow Chemical Company, Rohm and Haas Company,

Raj L. Gupta, Pierre R. Brondeau, Jacques M. Croisetiere,

Robert A. Lonergan, Ell en S. Friedell, Royce Warrick,

Jane Greenetz, Deanna May, Cynthia Mazer,

Appellants in No. 15

- 1569

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Lori Hamlin, Nancy Mayo,

Sean B. McSweeney, Richard P . Quinlan and Michael Miller,

Appellants in No. 15

- 1570

________________

On Appeal from the District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 2

- 11

- cv

- 06194)

Distric t Judge: James Knoll Gardner

________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

January 14, 2016Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge , AMBRO, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

________________

JUDGMENT ORDER

________________

Essentially, for the re asons set forth in the District Court’s opinion, we will affirm

the order of the District Court, denying in part and granting in part Defendants’ motions.

BY THE COURT,

s/Anthony J. Scirica

Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/Marcia M. Wal dron

Clerk

DATED: April 25, 2016

CJG/cc: All Counsel of Record
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 13, 2018

 

 

*/s/ Roderick Bartlett                      *

Roderick Bartlett 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

JMP Group Inc.

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph A. Jolson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                         
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: June 21, 2007 |  | /s/ Joseph A. Jolson                    
|                    |  | Joseph A. Jolson Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) of PennantPark
Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn            
|Name: Arthur H. Penn          
|Title: Chief Executive Officer
|Date: February 8, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15225]




[[Page 30777]]


_______________________________________________________________________

Part VI





Department of Defense





_______________________________________________________________________



Department of the Army



Corps of Engineers



_______________________________________________________________________



Proposal To Issue, Reissue, and Modify Nationwide Permits; Public 
Hearing; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 117 / Monday, June 17, 1996 / 
Notices

[[Page 30778]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army
Corps of Engineers


Proposal To Issue, Reissue, and Modify Nationwide Permits; Public 
Hearing

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Today, the Corps has published a Notice document containing 
its proposal to reissue the existing nationwide permits (NWPs) and 
conditions, with some modifications, and issue four new NWPs. The Corps 
will hold a public hearing on the nationwide permits contained in that 
proposal. The hearing is open to the public. Comments may be submitted 
in person at the hearing or in writing to the Office of the Chief of 
Engineers at the address given below. Filing of a written statement at 
the time of giving an oral statement would be helpful and facilitate 
the job of the court reporter. The hearing will be transcribed. Persons 
wishing to testify are requested to limit their statements to 15 
minutes. The hearing will be held in accordance with the Corps public 
hearing regulations in 33 CFR part 327. The legal authority for this 
hearing is Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and 
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). The 
hearing record will remain open until August 1, 1996.

DATES: The hearing will commence at 10:00 AM on July 17, 1996, and end 
at 4:00 PM or before, if all speakers present have had an opportunity 
to speak.

ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at the National Guard Association 
Building, One Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC. Written comments 
may be submitted to HQUSACE, ATTN: CECW-OR, Washington, DC, 20314-1000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tim Zimmerman or Mr. Sam 
Collinson, Regulatory Branch, Office of the Chief of Engineers at (202) 
761-0199.

    Dated: June 6, 1996.

    Approved:
Stanley G. Genega,
Major General, U.S. Army, Director of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 96-15225 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-P
#### Doris L. CLARK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ROLLINS, INC., Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69131.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 21, 1996.

Rehearing Denied June 26, 1996.

Gary H. Feder, Jim M. Parmer, Ziercher & Hocker, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.

Kenneth J. Heinz, Curtis, Oetting, Heinz, Garrett & Soule, Clayton, for respondent.

Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her fraud claim upon defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for the Court’s decision. The trial court’s dismissal is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
DABNEY & PAPPAS

A Partnership of Professional Corporations

Attorneys and Counselors at Law

1776 Yorktown, Suite 425

Houston, Texas 77056

Gus E. Pappas Facsimile

713-621-2678 713-621-0074

October 26, 2015

ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH PRODOC

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

301 Fannin, Suite 245

Houston, Texas 77002

Re: Cause No. 14-14-00905-CV; Day & Night, Inc., Colorado County Oil Company,

Inc., and SNP Business, Inc v. Star Tex Distributors, Inc.; In the Fourteenth Court of

Appeals for the State of Texas

Dear Clerk: 

This office represents Appellee, Star Tex Distributors, Inc., in the above-referenced appeal,

which is set for submission and oral argument before the Court, on Wednesday, October 28, 2015,

at 10:30 a.m.

This letter shall serve to notify the Court that counsel for Appellee, Star Tex Distributors,

Inc., intends to present Plaintiff’s Exhibit 30, which can be found in the Supplemental Reporter’s

Record, filed on or about August 7, 2015, as evidence at the oral argument. A true and correct copy

of such exhibit is being attached along with this filing. A filing fee in the amount of twenty-five and

00/100 dollars, ($25.00), is being paid electronically herewith. 

Please feel free to contact my office should you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

DABNEY & PAPPAS

/s/ Gus E. Pappas

Gus E. Pappas, P.C., as Partner

Gus E. Pappas, for the P.C.

GEP:tc

cc: Client

Abel Manji

Donald Grissom

ACCEPTED

14-14-00905-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/26/2015 1:42:25 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/26/2015 1:42:25 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors
K-1 Builders, Inc.


     We have issued a report dated September 14, 2000, accompanying the
financial statements of K-1 Builders, Inc. included in the Registration
Statement Form SB-2 and the related prospectus.

     We consent to the use of this report, as stated above in the Registration
Statement.  We also consent to the use of our name in the statement with
respect to us appearing under the heading"Experts" in the Registration
Statement.

Respectfully submitted,


/s/ Robison, Hill & Co.

Salt Lake City, Utah
December 21, 2000
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Las Vegas Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon D. Berkley, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Bruce A. Shepard, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




By:
            /s/
      Jon D. Berkley
            Dated:
            May
      12, 2010Jon
      D. BerkleyTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)By:
            /s/
      Bruce A. Shepard
            Dated:
            May
      12, 2010Bruce
      A. ShepardTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)







This
certification is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.




A signed
copy of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended  June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Neev Nissenson, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





August 16, 2010
By:
/s/  Neev NissensonNeev NissensonChief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0616. YVONNE E. LEE v. PAUL W. LEE. 

Yvonne E. Lee filed this direct appeal from the trial court’sfinal judgment and

decree of divorce. However, appeals from “judgments or orders in divorce, alimony,

and other domestic relations cases” must be made by application for discretionary

appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). The appellant’s failure to follow the discretionary

appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED. See Ford v. Ford, 347 Ga. App. 233, 234 (818 SE2d 690) (2018). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 04, 2023

12/04/2023
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S (the  "Company")
on Form  20-F/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Aldo
M.N. Petersen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


Dated:  November 2, 2005                        /s/ ALDO M.N. PETERSEN
                                                ----------------------
                                                Aldo M.N. Petersen
                                                Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14782]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 96-12]


Compania Sud Americana de Vapores S.A. v. Inter-American Freight 
Conference; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

    Notice is given that a complaint filed by Compania Sud Americana de 
Vapores S.A. (``Complainant'') against Inter-American Freight 
Conference (``Respondent'') was served June 5, 1996. Complainant 
alleges that Respondent has violated sections 10(a) (2) and (3) of the 
Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. Secs. 1709(a)(2) and (3) by using 
funds from complainant's Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit for costs 
in winding up a Brazil corporation, contrary to the provisions of the 
Inter-American Freight Conference Agreement.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the office of Administrative 
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence 
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after 
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer 
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing 
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of 
the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine 
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the 
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. 
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of 
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by June 5, 
1997, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by 
October 3, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14782 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Dion Anchrum,

Defendant.

No. CR-17-50207-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Terminate Supervised Release Term. 

Having reviewed defendant’s request and the Government’s response indicating the 

government and the probation office do not object, and good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion to Terminate Supervised Release

Term (Doc. 2). Defendant Michael Dion Anchrum’s supervised release is terminated. 

Dated this 28th day of May, 2020.

Douglas L. Rayes

United States District Judge

Case 2:17-cr-50207-DLR Document 5 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.90





EXTENSION AGREEMENT





This Extension Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated as of March 1, 2011, is entered into by and among Location Based Technologies, Inc., (“Borrower”) and Rotary Partners, LLC, (“Holder”).





RECITALS:





WHEREAS, the Holder has loaned $100,000 to the Borrower as of the effective date of this Extension Agreement, evidenced by a Promissory Note Agreement dated May 19, 2010 with an original maturity date of December 13, 2010 (“Note”) and by this Extension Agreement dated March 1, 2011 hereby extending the maturity date to March 31, 2011; and





WHEREAS, the Borrower and Holder agree to further extend the maturity date of the Note in accordance with the terms hereof.





AGREEMENT:





NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:





1.Extension of Maturity Date.The Maturity Date under the Note is hereby extended for an additional time until March 31, 2011.




2.Conversion Payment.  Holder shall receive the principal and accrued interest, with the funds going first to the accrued interest and the balance to the principal until paid in full.





3.Shares.  Rotary Partners, LLC shall receive 100,000 shares of the Company’s restricted Common Stock.





4.Full Force and Effect.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Note dated May 19, 2010, shall remain in full force and effect.  Except for any waivers and modifications contained herein, this Agreement shall not in any way waive or prejudice any of the rights or obligations of the Holder or the Borrower under the Note, under any law, in equity or otherwise, and such waivers and modifications shall not constitute a waiver or modification of any other provision of the Note nor a waiver or modification of any subsequent default or breach of any obligation of the Borrower or of any subsequent right of the Holder.





1




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of March 1, 2011.








The “Borrower”








Location Based Technologies, Inc.











The “Holder”


Stephen Funk
 
 
 
 2
H. Res. 640 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 14, 2009. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he 

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT: 

Mr. Harper. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### Roberta LOPER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 70085.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 1, 1996.

David Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the dismissal of her Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court found that she failed to file her motion within ninety days of *480her delivery to the department of corrections, Rule 24.035(b). Movant alleges that the time limits of Rule 24.035 are unconstitutional. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).