alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Manuel Armando Reyna, Jr.,

Petitioner,

v. 

Bruno Stolc, et al.,

Respondents.

No. CV-18-00105-TUC-RM

ORDER 

On August 20, 2019, Magistrate Judge Lynette C. Kimmins issued a Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 19) recommending that this Court deny Petitioner Manuel 

Armando Reyna, Jr.’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 

1). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.

A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a 

magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which 

objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 

72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is 

filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record 

in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 

F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the 

district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan, 

CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for 
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation).

The Court has reviewed Judge Kimmins’s Report and Recommendation, the 

parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no clear error in Judge Kimmins’s Report 

and Recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted 

and adopted in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing 

Section 2254 Cases, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability, because 

reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 478, 484 (2000).

Dated this 10th day of January, 2020.
Exhibit
23








Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-84764) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-143578, No. 333-45949, No. 333-68855,
No. 333-77111, No. 333-73240, No. 333-86796, and No. 333-115426) of PMA
Capital Corporation of our reports dated March 10, 2008, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules
of PMA Capital Corporation and subsidiaries, and internal control over financial
reporting, which appear in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of PMA Capital
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007.








/s/ Beard Miller Company
LLP








Beard
Miller Company LLP


Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania


March 10,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14551]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management


Lower Snake River District Resource Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management--Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lower Snake River District Resource Advisory Council will 
meet at the district office to discuss options for applying terms and 
conditions for improving riparian areas to livestock grazing permits 
and leases.

DATES: Tuesday, June 18, 1996. The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and 
a public comment period will begin at 9:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The Lower Snake River District Office is located at 3948 
Development Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Rose, Lower Snake River District 
Office (208-384-3393).

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
Barry Rose,
Public Affairs Specialist.
[FR Doc. 96-14551 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 640 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 640

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 14, 2009.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Harper.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11703]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Under the authority of Section 6 of Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 
1953 and Section 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1966, and pursuant 
to the authorities vested in me as Secretary of Health and Human 
Services, I hereby make the following changes within the Department of 
Health and Human Services that affects the U.S. Public Health Service. 
This Notice amends Part A, Office of the Secretary, Chapter AC, Office 
of Public Health and Science, as last amended at 60 FR 56605-06. The 
change is to include the Regional Health Administrator (Regions I-X) 
and associated staff as part of the Public Health Service. The change 
follows:
    Delete paragraph ``VI. Continuation of the Public Health Service,'' 
in its entirety and replace with the following:

    VI. Continuation of the Public Health Service. The newly 
established Operating Divisions, the Office of Public Health and 
Science, and the Regional Health Administrator (Regions I-X) and 
associated staff shall constitute the Public Health Service.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Donna E. Shalala,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11703 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 11-6-2008 

# U SA v . Goldb e rg P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-1048

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" U SA v . Go ldbe rg " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 185. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/185P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT
N o. 07- 1048
UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. M AR VI N GOL DB E RG ,

A ppel l ant

A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C r i m i nal A ct i on N o. 05- cr - 00157) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e J . C ur t i s J oyner

A r gued J une 10, 2008 B efor e: A M B R O , C H A G A R E S and G R E E N B E R G , C i r cui tJ udges

( O pi ni on fi l ed A ugus t8, 2008)
OR DE R A M E ND I NG 

### PRECEDENTI AL OP I NI ON A M B R O , C i r cui tJudge I T I S N O W O R D E R E D t hatt he publ i s hed O pi ni on i n t he above cas e fi l ed A ugus t8, 20 08 , be am end ed as fo l l ow s: O n page 8, i n t he l i ne bef or e the bl ock quot e, i ns er t “exi s t ed” aft er t he n- das h, t o r ead “

– exis ted in order

to convict”.2

O n p a g e 1 0 , f

o u rth a n d f

if th lin e s f ro m b o tto m , rep lac e , in b o th lin e s, “ w h e re ” w ith “i n w hi ch”. O n page 17, fi fth l i ne fr om bot t om of fi r s tful l par agr aph, i ns er ta s pace aft er“§”. O n p a g e 2 2 , lin e 2 o f

th e b lo c k q u o te , re p la c e d o u b le -h yp h e n w ith m -d a s h
. O n page 24, l i ne 7, del et e “10 ” fr om “1098 ” t o r ead “ 1097- 98”. O n page 25, l i ne 1, del et e “10 ” fr om “1098 ” t o r ead “ 1097- 98”. B yth e C o u rt, / s /T hom as L . A m br o, C i r cui tJ udge
D at ed: N ovember 6, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Daniel J. O’Connor, Jr., Bar No. 010081

Karen J. Stillwell, Bar No. 022711

Jared M. Scarbrough, Bar No. 022011

O'CONNOR & DYET, P.C.

7955 South Priest Drive

Tempe, Arizona 85284

daniel.oconnor@occlaw.com

karen.stillwell@occlaw.com

jared.scarbrough@occlaw.com

(602) 241-7000

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mussalina Muhaymin as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of 

Muhammad Abdul Muhaymin Jr.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

City of Phoenix, an Arizona Municipal

Corporation; Antonio Tarango; Officer 

Oswald Grenier; Officer Kevin 

McGowan; Officer Jason Hobe; Officer 

Ronaldo Canilao; Officer David Head; 

Officer Susan Heimbinger; Officer James 

Clark; Officer Dennis Lerous; Officer 

Ryan Nielson; Officer Steven Wong; and 

Doe Supervisors 1-5,

Defendants.

Case No.: 17-cv-04565-PHX-SMB

DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO SEAL EXHIBIT

ATTACHED TO DEFENDANTS’ 

SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM 

RE: CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNATION 

OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS AND 

VIDEOTAPES

Defendants City of Phoenix, Antonio Tarango, Oswald Grenier, Kevin McGowan, 

Jason Hobel, Ronaldo Canilao, David Head, Susan Heimbigner, James Clark, Dennis 

Leroux, Ryan Nielsen and Steven Wong (collectively the “Phoenix Defendants”), 

respectfully request this Court seal Exhibit A, attached to Defendants’ Supplement to 
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Memorandum Re: Confidential Designation of Deposition Transcripts and Videotapes

(Dkt No. 179). The Exhibit contains Plaintiff’s demand to Phoenix Defendants’ and 

arguably should have been designated under Rule 408. Thus, the letter should be sealed 

from public view. 

Dated: May 29, 2020. 

O’CONNOR & DYET, P.C.

By: /s/ Karen J. Stillwell

Daniel J. O’Connor, Jr.

Karen J. Stillwell

Jared M. Scarbrough

Attorneys for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 29, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, using the CM/ECF 

System. A Notice of Electronic Filing will be served to the following registered 

participants:

David A. Chami

PRICE LAW GROUP, APC 

8245 N. 85th Way

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Attorney for Pintiff 

Haytham Faraj

LAW OFFICES OF HAYTHAM FARAJ 

1935 W Belmont Ave. 

Chicago, IL 60657

Attorney for Plaintiff

Brian J. Theut

Theut, Theut & Theut

5150 North 16th Street

Phoenix, AZ 85016

brian@theutlaw.com

Guardian Ad Litem and Statutory 

Representative for A. M. 

By: /s/ Kim Penny
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50358 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

PRISCILLA LEE RASCO, also known as Priscilla Rasco

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:09

- CR

- 974

- 3

Before J OLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Priscilla Lee Rasco has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Rasco h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50358 Document: 00513883063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 16

- 50358

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50358 Document: 00513883063 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Peoples First, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year-ending December 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Susan H. Reeves, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | BY:                                                |   | /s/ Susan H. Reeves |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|   |   | Susan H. Reeves                                    |
|   |   | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | March 16, 2004                                |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Xenacare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| |                        
| |                        
| | /s/ Bobby Story        
| | Bobby Story            
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | May 23, 2011
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 8, 2014

NO. 03-14-00292-CR

Ex parte Alberto Garcia

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from an adverse ruling entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, 

it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 10.1

JMP GROUP INC.

SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE GOALS UNDER THE 2007 SENIOR EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) established the performance goals for the fiscal 2007
bonus for the following named executive officers:



| |  |                                                                                   |  | 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | Joseph A. Jolson Carter D. Mack Craig R. Johnson Mark L. Lehmann Thomas B. Kilian |  | 

Under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan, each of the named executive officers will receive a
bonus payment upon (i) the achievement by the Company of a compensation expense to revenue ratio of sixty percent (60%) or less for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, and (ii) the achievement of a certain performance
target with respect to operating income for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. The performance targets describe above exclude compensation expense attributable to equity-based compensation granted prior to and in connection with the
Companys initial public offering. Any bonus payments under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan will be paid in one lump sum payment shortly after the end of the 2007 fiscal year.
#### Susan KINDER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Ronald KINDER, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 65598.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 28, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 26, 1995.

*680James J. Knappenberger, Shaw, Howlett & Knappenberger, Clayton, for appellant.

Susan M. Hals, Hais & Carmody, P.C., Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from that portion of a dissolution decree awarding wife maintenance. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1(1)

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Joshua Pickus, the Chief Executive Officer of Support.com, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JOSHUA
PICKUSJoshua PickusChief Executive Officer and President


Date: March 12, 2010



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350
has been provided to Support.com, Inc. and will be retained by Support.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
specifically incorporates it by reference.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-149]



      
========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 1996 / 
Notices

[[Page 407]]


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Information Collection Submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget for Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

December 28, 1995.
    The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments 
regarding these information collections are best assured of having 
their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. 
Comments should be addressed to: Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB), Washington, D.C. 20503 and to Department Clearance Officer, 
UADA, OIRM, Ag Box 7630, Washington, D.C. 20250-7630. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720-6204 or (202) 720-
6746.

Farm Service Agency

    Title: General Regulations Governing the Peanut Warehouse Storage 
Loan and Handler Operations--7 CFR 1446.
    Summary: USDA supports the price of peanuts by offering price 
support loans and by placing limits on the amount of peanuts allowed to 
be sold for domestic edible use. Their information is needed to 
administer the program.
    Need and Use of the Information: This information enables the 
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) to contract for warehouse storage 
and related services. For handlers of contract additional peanuts, CCC 
uses the information to determine the amount of shrink allowed, the 
type of supervision required, the amount of export obligation, and the 
amount of export disposition credit. The information provides CCC with 
evidence of collateral pledged as security for peanut price support 
loans which have been advanced pursuant to law.
    Description of Respondents: Business or other for-profit; Farms.
    Number of Respondents: 150,000.
    Frequency of Responses: On occasion; Weekly; Monthly; Annually.
    Total Burden Hours: 54,118.
Larry Roberson,
Deputy Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-149 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-M