alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Februar y 12, 2 003 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. THURMAN L. WHI TSEY AND

CHARLIE MAE WHITS EY Criminal Court for Davidson County

No. 2000-B-1062

No. M2001-03127-CCA-R3-CD - F iled June 3, 2003

AMENDED JUDGMENT

Ca me the appellants, THURMAN L. WHI TSEY and CHARLI

E MAE WHITSEY, b y counsel, andthe state, by the Attorne y Gener al, and this case was heard on the record on appeal from the Criminal Courtof Davidson County; and upon considera tion thereof, this court is of the opinion that our original judgment entered April 23, 2003, should be vacated; that there is reversible error inthe judgments of the trial court relating only to the weaponsoffense

under Cou

nt 5; and th

e case sh ou ld be re ma nd ed fo r a re se nt en ci ng de te rm in at io n r el at in g t o a pp el la nt , C ha rl ie Ma e W hi ts ey. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that our orig inal judgment dated

April 23, 200 3, be vaca

ted, and a

ppellant Thurman L . Whitsey ’s conviction under Count 5 for

unlawfu l pos sessio n of a weapon and appellant Charlie Mae Whitsey ’s conviction under Count 5 for facilitation of unlawful possession of a weapon are reve rsed and di sm is sed . It is further ordered that the case be remanded for a res en te nc in g d et er mi na ti on as to ap pe ll an t, Ch ar li e M ae Wh it se y, pursuant to our ord

er gra nting the petition to

rehear . The judg

ments of th

e trial c ourt are

otherwis e affirmed, and the ca se is remanded to the Criminal Court of Davidson County for a resentencing determinationas to Charlie MaeWhitsey, the execution of the remaining judgmen ts of that c ourt, and for collection of costs accrued below. It appears that the a

ppellant s are ind

igent. C osts of ap

peal will b e paid by the State of Tennessee.

Joe G . Ril ey, Judge Jos eph M. Tipt on, J udge Thoma s T. W oodal l, J udge
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Curtis Kevin JACKSON, Appellant.

No. WD 49753.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 6, 1995.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Jackson appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance in or about the premises of a correctional institution in violation of section 217.360, RSMo 1994.

The conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 163 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 163 Filed 03/04/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 163 Filed 03/04/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 163 Filed 03/04/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 163 Filed 03/04/20 Page 5 of 5
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 7, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00886-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF N.J., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-20952-S


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright In a postcard notice dated September 11, 2013, the Court informed appellant that his brief
was past due. We instructed a ppellant to file a brie f along with an extens ion motion within ten
days. We cautioned appellant that his appeal would be dismissed if he failed to file a brief and

extension motion within the time re quested. As of today’s date, a ppellant has not filed a brief.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1).

130886F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF N.J., A CHILD

No. 05-13-00886-CV On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-20952-S. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee, OFFICE OF ATTO RNEY GENERAL, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, JOB JACOBS.

Judgment entered February 7, 2014

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT A 

Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 2 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 3 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 4 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 5 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 6 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 7 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 8 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 9 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 10 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 11 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 12 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 13 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 14 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 15 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 16 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 17 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 18 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 19 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 20 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 21 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 22 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 23 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 24 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 25 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 26 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 27 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 28 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 29 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00587-FRZ Document 1-3 Filed 12/04/17 Page 30 of 30
�

&ƌŽŵ͗�EŝŶƚŚ��ŝƌĐƵŝƚ�:ƵĚŝĐŝĂů��ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ�фŶĐũĐΛĐĞε͘ƵƐĐŽƵƌƚƐ͘ŐŽǀх��^ĞŶƚ͗�dŚƵƌƐĚĂLJ͕�:ĂŶƵĂƌLJ�ϳ͕�ϮϬϮϭ�ϭ͗κϭ�WD�dŽ͗�ZĞĐŝƉŝĞŶƚ�>ŝƐƚ�^ƵƉƉƌĞƐƐĞĚ�фƌĞĐŝƉŝĞŶƚ ͅůŝƐƚ ͅƐƵƉƉƌĞƐƐĞĚΛŽϯςρ͘ƵƐĐŽƵƌƚƐ͘ŐŽǀх�^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗�΀�yd�ZE�>΁ϮϬϮϭ�EŝŶƚŚ��ŝƌĐƵŝƚ�:ƵĚŝĐŝĂů��ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ�

��

�

 �

All Ninth Circuit Judicial Officers, Lawyer Representatives & Court Unit Executives:�

 �

After conducting a survey of all the circuit and chief judges, unit executives, members of the Conference Executive Committee, and the Lawyer 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1113-4   Filed 01/19/21   Page 1 of 2

�

Representatives Coordinating Committee, I am very disappointed to announce that the 2021 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference is cancelled.  �

 �

With the recent national surge upon a surge in COVID-19 cases and issues regarding accessibility of vaccines, it may be too soon to get together. Currently, Big Sky is not accepting large groups and, after discussions with leadership and Conference staff, we have concluded that it will be safer and more prudent to wait until 2022.  �

 �

We are in the process of reworking our contracts and anticipate that we will hold the 2022 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference in Big Sky, July 17-21.  I will send you a “save the date” once the contract is signed and approved.  �

 �

Martha and I extend to all of you our best wishes for a happy, healthy, and safe 2021.  Although this was a difficult decision, we will celebrate being together with all of you when it is safe, and we can all see each other in person.  �

 �

Sincerely,�

�

Sidney R. Thomas�

Chief Judge��

�

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1113-4   Filed 01/19/21   Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 13, 2010   /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
        No. 32.1
 Form
        10-QSB
 Signet
        International Holdings, Inc.
 File
        No.
        000-51185
 
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**
 **as
        adopted Pursuant to Section 906**
 **of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  
 In
        connection with the amended Quarterly
        Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-QSB for
        the
        period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
        on the date hereof (Report), I, Ernest W. Letiziano, Chief Executive Officer
        and
        Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  1.
                Such
                    Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
                    2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                    15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
                The
                    information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
                    for
                    the period ending June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all
                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                    of
                    Signet International Holdings,
                    Inc.
 Date: July
          31,
          2007
  By:
            */s/ Ernest W. Letiziano*
 Ernest
            W.
            Letiziano
 Chief
            Executive Officer and
 Chief
            Financial Officer
  A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International
          Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
          or its
          staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Donnie Romone Twiggs, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-18-00005-PHX-NVW (MHB)

ORDER 

and 

DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF 

APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA 

PAUPERIS STATUS

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns (Doc. 36) regarding petitioner’s Amended Petition for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 5). The R&R recommends 

that the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised 

the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 7 (citing 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)); Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner filed 

objections on February 4, 2019 (Doc. 38). 

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and 

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that 

the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the 

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning 

of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, 

the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”). 

Petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel on appeal must be presented to the 

Court of Appeals, as this Court lacks jurisdiction. The Clerk of this Court does not have 

the forms for moving for appointment of counsel on appeal, so the request for the Clerk to 

send Petitioner such a form must be denied. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 36) is accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying 

and dismissing Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 5) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners motion for the Clerk to send him a 

form for appointment of counsel on appeal (Doc. 39) is denied. 

A request for a certificate of appealability will be denied because dismissal of the 

Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the 

procedural ruling debatable. 

Dated: February 6, 2019.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Peter Strojnik, State Bar No. 6464

STROJNIK P.C.

2375 East Camelback Road Suite 600

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone: (602) 524-6602

ADA@strojnik.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

GTI Phoenix, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No: 2:18-cv-00439-DLR

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF 

OFFER OF JUDGMENT

Please note that Plaintiff accepts Defendant’s Offer of Judgment appended hereto 

as Exhibit 1.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of March 2018.

STROJNIK, P.C.

Peter Strojnik, 6464

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:18-cv-00439-DLR Document 13 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Forman *&*Company *v.*Nash, commissioner.

This case came before this court upon a writ of error from the. superior court of DeKalb County; and the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Fish, C. J., Beck, B. J., and Hill, J., favoring an affirmance, and Atkinson, Gilbert, and Hines, JJ., favoring a reversal of the judgment, the judgment of the court below stands affirmed by operation of law.

No. 3105.

November 17, 1922.

Petition for mandamus. Before Judge Hutcheson. DeKalb superior court. January 28, 1922.

Jones, *Evins & Moore*and *W. A.*Sutherland, for plaintiffs.

*L. J. Steele*and *J. Howell*Green, for defendant.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30851-30852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15428]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Hawaii Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Hawaii Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 2:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 31, 1996, at the Ala 
Moana Hotel, 410 Atkinson Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96814. The purpose of 
the meeting is to review current civil rights developments in the State 
and plan future program activities.

[[Page 30852]]

    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Oswald Stender, 
808-523-6203, or Philip Montez, Director of the Western Regional 
Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, June 7, 1996.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-15428 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 85

  Amending the Code of Official Conduct in the Rules of the House of 
 Representatives to strengthen the reporting requirements for Members 
                         who request earmarks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2009

Mr. Flake submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Standards of Official Conduct

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Code of Official Conduct in the Rules of the House of 
 Representatives to strengthen the reporting requirements for Members 
                         who request earmarks.

    Resolved, That clause 17(a) of rule XXIII (the Code of Official 
Conduct) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence:
        ``A campaign contribution in excess of a de minimis amount to a 
        Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner made by or on behalf 
        of any political, for profit, or nonprofit entity, made by or 
        on behalf of any employee or person affiliated with any such 
        entity, made by or on behalf of any political action committee 
        established by, administered by, or affiliated with any such 
        entity, by or on behalf of any registered lobbyist for any such 
        entity, or by or on behalf of any political action committee 
        established by, administered by, or affiliated with any 
        registered lobbyist for any such entity during the current or 
        previous session of Congress shall be treated as a financial 
        interest of that Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, as 
        applicable, for purposes of this clause.''.
                                 <all>
```
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Richard N. Jeffs    |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Richard      N. Jeffs        |   |   |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
| Rock      City Energy Corp.  |   |   |   |   |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                             GLACIER CAPITAL TRUST I


            This CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Glacier Capital Trust I (the "Trust")
is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a
business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801 et
seq.)

            1.    The name of the business trust formed by the Certificate of
                  Trust is Glacier Capital Trust I.

            2.    The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in
                  the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney
                  Square North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware
                  19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

            3.    This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing with
                  the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being the trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of December __, 2000.



                                    WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                    individual capacity, but solely as trustee


                                    By:
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                    Name:
                                    Title:


                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    James Strosahl, as trustee
EXHIBIT 32.2



NET TALK.COM, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)
OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Guillermo Rodriguez                     
|--------------------------------------------
|Guillermo Rodriguez                         
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Date: August 14, 2012