alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri Respondent, v. Bruce CONNER Appellant.

Nos. WD 44290, WD 46242.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 23, 1993.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and SHANGLER and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of two counts of forcible rape in violation of § 566.030, RSMo 1986, one count of forcible sodomy in violation of § 566.060 and one count of armed criminal action in violation of § 571.015. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent sentences totaling thirty-five years.

Defendant also appeals the judgment denying his motion for relief under Rule 29.-15.

Judgment is affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each ofthe undersigned officers of Services Acquisition Corp. International, aDelaware corporation (the ‘‘Company’’),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter endedSeptember  30,  2005 (the ‘‘Form10-Q’’) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of theCompany.

|                     |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---------------------|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:August 2,2006 |  |  | /s/ StevenR. Berrard                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                |  |  |      Steven R.Berrard     Chief ExecutiveOfficer     (Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |
|                     |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29762-29763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14789]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29763]]


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response Compensation and Recovery Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed partial consent decree in United States v. 
The Glidden Company, et al., Civil Action No. 5:95 CV 1009, was lodged 
on May 31, 1996 with the United States District Court for the Northern 
District of Ohio. This proposed consent decree would resolve the United 
States' claims against The Glidden Company, one of two defendants in 
this case, for unreimbursed past costs incurred at the Bohaty Drum Site 
in Medina County, Ohio, pursuant Section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607, 
in return for a payment of $60,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. The Glidden Company, et al., Civil Action No. 5:95 CV 
1009, and the Department of Justice Reference No. 90-11-2-1108.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Northern District of Ohio, 1800 Bank One 
Center, 600 Superior Avenue, East, Cleveland, Ohio, 44114-2600; the 
Region 5 Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604-3590; and at the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202-
624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained in 
person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 
4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please refer 
to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $4.25 (25 
cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 96-14789 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
JUDGMENT SET ASIDE; DISMISSED and Opinion Filed November 14, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00864-CV PAMELA ANDERSON, Appellant V. KELLY WEED AND KATHY WEED, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-03066-D



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Chief Justice Burns After the justice court held a jury trial in a forcible detainer suit and the jury rendered a verdict, appellant appealed to the county court. The county cour t ruled in appellees’ favor, and appellant appealed. The record before this Cour t includes only the jury verdict from the justice court and not a judgment from th e justice court. By letter dated September 25, 2019, the Dallas County Clerk’s Office confirmed that the jury verdict is all ther e is. Accordingly, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it appeared the county court never acquired jurisdiction. We instru cted appellant to file a letter brief addressing the Court’s concern. This Court’s jurisdiction over the merits of a ca se extends no further th an that of the court from which the appeal is taken. See Dallas Cty. App’l Dist. v. Funds Recovery, Inc. , 887 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1994, writ denied). A judgment must (1 ) clearly state the–2– determination of the rights of the parties in the ca se; (2) state who must pay the costs; (3) be signed by the judge; and (4) be dated the date of the judge’s signature. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 505.1(c)(1)- (4). A party may appeal a judgment in an eviction case from the just ice court to the county court. See id . 510.9(a). Because the justice court did not sign a judgment, there was nothing to appeal to the county court and that court never acquired juri sdiction. In this circum stance, this Court only has jurisdiction to set the county court’s judgment asid e and dismiss the cause. See Funds Recovery , 887 S.W.2d at 468. Although appellant filed a letter brief as reque sted, nothing in her brief demonstrates that this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Acco rdingly, we set aside the county court’s judgment and dismiss the cause.

190864F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
PAMELA ANDERSON, Appellant

No. 05-19-00864-CV V. KELLY WEED AND KATHY WEED, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-03066-D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and Nowell participating.

In accordance with th is Court’s opinion of this date , the county court’s July 1, 2019 judgment is SET ASIDE and this cause is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered November 14, 2019
# 05-70386 HAQUE V. gONZALES

 O'Scannlain, Levy  &  Callahan, CJJ

453.1564
Motion Granted and Order filed June 7, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-12-00444-CV

____________

GLENDA GOTCH, Appellant

V.

DAVID TERRY GOTCH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 246st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1998-27953

O R D E R

Appellant's prior appeal was dismissed because there was no final judgment. A 

final judgment was entered and this appeal ensued. Appellant moved to have the clerk's 

record and reporter's record filed in the prior appeal filed in this appeal. The motion is 

GRANTED.

We order the clerk's record and reporter’s record filed in our appellate case number 

14-11-00953-CV transferred from that case and filed in the records of this appeal. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
December 31, 2013 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                
|----------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat  
|Aviv Efrat      
|February 5, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30043

Summary Calendar

ANTONIO D. TYSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary; ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden; LARRY GROW,

Colonel,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:10-CV-1174

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio D. Tyson, Louisiana prisoner # 331834, appeals the summary

judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. He claimed that prison

restrictions on possession and purchase of mailing and reading materials and

radios violated his First Amendment rights and being housed with mentally ill

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 5, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30043 Document: 00511529416 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2011
No. 11-30043

inmates and forced to wear full restraints while exercising outdoors violated his

Eighth Amendment rights.1

Tyson refers to a number of issues in his appellate briefs, most of which

are waived by virtue of inadequate briefing. See FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A);

United States v. Stalnaker, 571 F.3d 428, 439-40 (5th Cir. 2009); Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). His assertion that the district court

failed to conduct de novo review of his objections to the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation is without merit. See Habets v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 363

F.3d 378, 382 (5th Cir. 2004). With respect to his claim regarding restrictions

on inmate purchases of reading materials and radios, his attempt to distinguish

Beard v. Banks, 548 U.S. 521 (2006), is unavailing, and he has, therefore, failed

to show the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the

defendants on this claim. See FED. R. CIV.P. 56(a); Hill v. Carroll County, Miss.,

587 F.3d 230, 233-34 (5th Cir. 2009).

Tyson’s various complaints about issues he claims should have been

addressed by the district judge and the magistrate judge are waived by virtue

of inadequate briefing. See FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A); Stalnaker, 571 F.3d at

439-40; Yohey, 985 F.2d at 225. Tyson has also failed to show that the district

court abused its discretion in denying his motion for leave to amend his

complaint. See Fahim v. Marriott Hotel Servs., Inc., 551 F.3d 344, 347 (5th Cir.

2008).

AFFIRMED; motion for appointment of counsel DENIED.

The restrictions imposed on Tyson and of which he complains were imposed because 1

he was in Extended Lockdown Level 1 for, among other offenses, fighting, aggravated

disobedience, and possession of contraband; thus, prison officials have limited nonreligious/non-legal reading materials.

2

Case: 11-30043 Document: 00511529416 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/05/2011
#### Nancy MADOUX, As Guardian and Conservator of the Estate of Eileen Miller, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald R. WILLETT and Doris E. Willett, Defendants/Appellants.

No. 67003.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 2, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 12, 1995.

Lawrence 0. Willbrand, St. Louis, for appellant.

Daniel M. Roddy, Portman & Copper, Clayton, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court setting aside a quit claim deed executed by Eileen Miller, grantor, to Donald R. Willett and Doris E. Willett, his -wife, grantees, is supported by substantial and competent evidence of undue influence. The award of attorney fees in favor of Nancy Madoux as guardian/eonservator of the estate of Eileen Miller was within the discretion of the trial court.

An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
**
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8No. 333-189670, Form S-8No. 333-117956 and Form S-8No. 333-79391) of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 18, 2019, related to our audit of the consolidated financial statements and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 
/s/ HORNE LLPMemphis, TennesseeApril 2, 2019**
**Exhibit
      No. 32.1**


Form
      10-QSB


Signet
      International Holdings, Inc.


File
      No.
      000-51185








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**as
      adopted Pursuant to Section 906**


**of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc.
      (Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ernest W.
      Letiziano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: May
      14, 2007 By: /s/
      Ernest W. Letiziano


Ernest
      W.
      Letiziano


Chief
      Executive
      Officer and


Chief
      Financial
      Officer

















A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International
      Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATION  I, Henry Andrews, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, of TransAct Energy Corp. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  November 7, 2008  /s/ Henry Andrews Henry Andrews President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2016

No. 04-16-00171-CR

Zachary Shawn WHITESIDE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR2958

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sachiko Nagao-Trevino’s request for additional time to file the reporter’s record is 

granted. We order Sachiko Nagao-Trevino to file the reporter’s record by June 27, 2016.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of May, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zhijuan
Guo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 16, 2009
              By:
              /s/Zhijuan
    GuoZhijuan
      GuoChief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial and Accounting
                Officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                |                                                                                                                               |                                             |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                June 25, 2007 |                                                                                                                          |                                        |
|                                     |                                                                                                                                    | /s/              Todd              D. Montgomery |
|                                | Todd                D. Montgomery, CEO and Director(Chief                Executive Officer of Silver Reserve                Corp.) |
|                                |                                                                                                                                       |                                        |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                June 25, 2007 |                                                                                                                                  |                                   |
|                                     |                                                                                                                                            | /s/              Randal              Ludwar |
|                                | Randal                  Ludwar, Chief Financial Officer(Chief                  Financial Officer of Silver Reserve                  Corp.) |

----