alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 3.1a**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

 

to the

 

**AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

 

of

 

**COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION,**

a Delaware corporation

 

* * * * *

 

Pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law

 

* * * * *

 

CombiMatrix Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

 

FIRST:  That the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on December 21, 2006.

 

SECOND:    That the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation has been amended as follows:

 

Article IV, Section 1 of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

Section 1.     Authorization.The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the Corporation isauthorized to issue is Thirty Million (30,000,000) shares, consisting ofTwenty-Five Million (25,000,000) shares of Common Stock with a par valueof $.001 per share, and Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock witha par value of $.001 per share.

 

THIRD:  That the aforementioned amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware by the affirmative vote of the necessary number of shares as required by statute at the annual meeting of stockholders on June 10, 2008, which meeting was called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of said Law.

 

* * * *

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of this tenth day of June, 2008.

 

CombiMatrix Corporation,

a Delaware corporation

 
| By:                                                     | /s/ SCOTT R. BURELL |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                                                    |
| Name: Scott R. Burell                                   |
|                                                    |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 2 

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’  

MOTION TO DISMISS 

The Satanic Temple and Michelle Shortt v. City of Scottsdale 

Case No. 18‐cv‐00621‐DGC 

Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 13-2 Filed 07/06/18 Page 1 of 3
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William UusiheimalaPrincipal
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      14,  2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

August 23, 2024

SC-2024-0426

Ex parte Joshua Lamont MacGrady PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: State 

of Alabama v. Joshua Lamont MacGrady) (Jefferson District Court: DC2022-1555; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0867).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on August 23, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Sellers, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, 

Wise, Bryan, Mendheim, Stewart, Mitchell, and Cook, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.2

                              ASAT Holdings Limited
                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Robert J.
Gange, the Chief Financial Officer of ASAT Holdings Limited (the "Company"),
does hereby certify as follows:

     To the best of my knowledge, the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for
year ended April 30, 2004 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 9, 2004



                                                  /s/ Robert J. Gange
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Robert J. Gange
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer

The certification set forth above is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and should not be deemed to be filed under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Company or the certifying officers.

                                        5
#### Estelle CLARK, Claimant/Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Employer/Respondent.

No. 67436.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Oct. 17, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 20, 1995.

*735Estelle Clark, St. Louis, pro se.

David J. Reynolds, Jr., Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and AHRENS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Estelle Clark, appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which denied her claim for workers’ compensation.

We have reviewed the record. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

The judgment of the Labor and Industrial Commission is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14212]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Idaho Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Idaho Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 28, 1996, at the Red 
Lion--Riverside, 2900 Chinden Boulevard, Boise, Idaho 83714. The 
purpose of the meeting is to review civil rights developments, 
including law enforcement issues, and plan future program activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Gladys Esquibel, 
208-678-3838, or Philip Montez, Director of the Western Regional 
Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 28, 1996.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-14212 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28596-28597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14068]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, 
Inc. (NCMS)

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 9, 1996, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301

[[Page 28597]]

et seq. (``the Act''), the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, 
Inc. (``NCMS'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership and providing information on the status of its research 
projects. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the 
following company was accepted as an active member of NCMS: Vacuum 
Instrument Corporation, Ronkonkoma, NY. The following organizations 
were also approved for affiliate membership: Forging Industry 
Association, Cleveland, OH; Iowa State University, Ames, IA; Michigan 
State University, E. Lansing, MI; ORTECH Corporation, Mississauga, 
Ontario, Canada and The University of Michigan, College of Engineering, 
Ann Arbor, MI. The following companies have resigned from active 
membership in NCMS: AlliedSignal Inc., Morristown, NJ; Franklin 
Consulting, Ltd., Troy, MI; Groupe Procycle Inc., St. Georges, Quebec, 
Canada and Labbe Designers & Inc., Montreal, Quebec. The following 
organization has resigned from affiliate membership in NCMS: Texas 
State Technical College, Waco, TX.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NCMS intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 20, 1987, NCMS filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 17, 1987 (52 FR 8375).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 16, 
1996. This notice was published in the Federal Register on April 8, 
1996 (61 FR 15521).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-14068 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. Davis Thames, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.







Date: August 9, 2013


/s/ H. Davis ThamesH. Davis ThamesChief Financial Officer ofCheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner ofCheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit 32.2

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 (the
Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat
|Name:          |  | Aviv Efrat             
|Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:          |  | August 5, 2015
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We hereby
consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of Atna Resources Ltd. on Form
20-F of our report dated on March 31 2009, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2008.
  /s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner
& Hottman PC
 Denver,
Colorado
 March 31,
2009
  D
E V I S S E R G R A Y L L P
 CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS
 
 401 - 905
West Pender Street
 Vancouver,
BC Canada
 V6C
1L6
 
 Tel:
(604) 687-5447
 Fax:
(604) 687-6737
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
 To the
Board of Directors,
 Atna
Resources Ltd.
 
 We
consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of Atna Resources Ltd. on Form
20-F of our report to the shareholders on the consolidated financial statements
of that company as at December 31, 2007, and for each of the years in the two
year period ended December 31, 2007. Our report was dated March 27,
2008.
 
 /s/“De Visser Gray
LLP”
 
 Chartered
Accountants
 Vancouver,
BC, Canada
 March 30,
2009
**Exhibit
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of City Language Exchange, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonny
      White, Director acting as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








May
      14,
      2008




/s/
      Jonny
      White


Jonny
      White


President,
      Chief


Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer
February 12, 2013

SUBSTITUTE JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NABILCO INC. AND D. HOUSTON, INC. D/B/A TREASURES, Appellants

NO. 14-12-00832-CV V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellees

________________________________

Today, the Court heard appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal 

from the temporary injunction signed by the court below on October 12, 2012.

Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order our judgment 

filed January 10, 2013, VACATED, and the appeal DISMISSED. Our opinion 

issued January 10, 2013, is not withdrawn.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, Nabilco Inc. and D. Houston, Inc. D/B/A Treasures, jointly and 

severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14660]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-250-000]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 5, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 31, 1996, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) 
submitted for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A.
    By this filing, Equitrans seeks approval to offer a new 
interruptible parking service under Rate Schedule PS. Equitrans states 
that under this Rate Schedule customers may park gas on Equitrans' 
system for up to 15 days, paying a daily charge for the service. 
Equitrans requests that the Commission allow the tariff sheets to 
become effective on July 1, 1996.
    Equitrans proposes a maximum daily rate for the service of $0.0028/
Dth, which is derived from the existing rates for Rate Schedule INSS. 
Equitrans states that it is offering parking service as a tool for 
customers to manage aggregated supply on the Equitrans system, and to 
reduce exposure to balancing and scheduling penalties. Equitrans states 
that the rates, terms, and conditions of service and the appropriate 
level of allocated costs can be reviewed in Equitrans' 1997 rate case 
after experience is gained with the service.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should file a motion to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with the requirements of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211). All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All protests filed 
with the Commission will be considered by it in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person desiring to become a 
party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any hearing 
therein must file a petition for leave to intervene in accordance with 
the Commission's Rules.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.

Appendix A

Original Sheet No. 7A
Second Revised Sheet No. 10
Original Sheet No. 77
Original Sheet No. 78
Original Sheet No. 79
Original Sheet No. 80
Sheet Nos. 81-199
Third Revised Sheet No. 203
First Revised Sheet No. 213
Second Revised Sheet No. 215
Second Revised Sheet No. 300
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 304
Original Sheet No. 368
Original Sheet No. 369
Original Sheet No. 370
Original Sheet No. 371
Original Sheet No. 372
Sheet Nos. 373-399

[FR Doc. 96-14660 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aerogrow International Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Mitchell B. Rubin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the period covered by this Report.





Date:  February
      13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Mitchell B. RubinMitchell
      B. RubinChief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

 Petitioner Alfonso Lopez-Millan has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The Honorable Deborah M. Fine, United States 

Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 14), 

recommending that the Court deny the Petition. Judge Fine advised the parties that they 

had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely 

objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. 

#) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)). 

 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is wellAlfonso Lopez-Millan, 

 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

Carla Hacker-Agnew, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-18-00486-PHX-SPL

ORDER 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 

findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The 

district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further 

evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Magistrate Judge Fine’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is 

accepted and adopted by the Court; 

2. That the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(Doc. #) is denied and dismissed with prejudice; 

3. That a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on 

appeal are denied; and 

4. That the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. 

Dated this 8th day of August, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge