alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cytta Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chad Rutherford, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 11 day of August, 2008.  /s/ Chad Rutherford_ Chad Rutherford Chief Executive and Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOANERGES DE JESUS CORNEL, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-73328 

Agency No. A075-623-241 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 19, 2019**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Boanerges De Jesus Cornel, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. 

Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-73328 

petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cornel’s untimely motion to 

reopen, where he failed to demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief to qualify 

for an exception to the time limitation for motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 986 (the BIA can deny a motion to 

reopen for failure to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought). We 

reject Cornel’s contention that the BIA did not properly consider his evidence.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Cornel’s contentions regarding claims for 

relief that he did not present to the BIA in his motion to reopen. See Barron v. 

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust issues or 

claims in administrative proceedings below).

We also lack jurisdiction to consider Cornel’s challenges to the BIA’s 2014 

order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture because 

Cornel failed to file a timely petition for review as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(b)(1) (“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the 

date of the final order of removal.”); see also Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 

(9th Cir. 2003) (30-day deadline is “mandatory and jurisdictional”).

We do not address Cornel’s due process contention. See Martinez-Serrano 

v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (“Issues raised in a brief that are not 
3 17-73328 

supported by argument are deemed abandoned.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
H. Res. 836 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 22, 2009. 

Whereas 70 percent of 8th graders and 65 percent of 12th 

graders do not read at grade level; 

Whereas for many adolescent students, ongoing difficulties 

with reading and writing figure prominently into the decision to drop out of school; 

Whereas available data shows 85 percent of all juvenile offenders have reading problems and approximately onethird of all juvenile offenders read below the fourth-grade 

level; 

Whereas advanced literacy across content areas is the best 

available predictor of the ability of students to succeed in 

introductory college courses; 

Whereas research shows that teens who read for fun have 

better test scores and are more likely to succeed in the 

workforce; 

Whereas Teen Read Week encourages teens to read a book 

for leisure purposes; 

Whereas Teen Read Week recognizes that it is important for 

adolescents to read proficiently; and 

Whereas October 18 to October 24, 2009, is Teen Read 

Week: Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 836 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Teen Read 

Week; 

(2) recognizes that it is important for teens to be 

taught to read proficiently; and 

(3) encourages teens to read for leisure and academic purposes. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
    COMPANY                                                         JURISDICTION
 
Poland Communications, Inc.                                             New York
 
At Entertainment Limited                                          United Kingdom
 
Wizja TV Sp. z o.o.                                                       Poland
 
Poland Cablevision (Netherlands) B.V.                                Netherlands
 
Sereke Holding B.V.                                                  Netherlands
 
@Entertainment Programming, Inc.                                        Delaware
 
Czestochowska TK Sp. z o.o.                              Poland (in liquidation)
 
Wizja TV Spoka Produkcyjna Sp. z o.o                                      Poland

ETV Sp. z o.o.                                                            Poland
 
Gosat-Service Sp. z o.o.                                                  Poland
 
Ground Zero Media Sp. z o.o.                                              Poland
 
At Media Sp. z o.o.                                                       Poland
 
At Entertainment Services Limited                                 United Kingdom
 
Kolor-Sat Sp. z o.o.                                                      Poland
 
Mazurska Telewizja Kablowa Sp. z o.o.                                     Poland
 
Opolskie TTT S.A.                                                         Poland
 
Mozaic Entertainment, Inc.                                              Delaware
 
Polska Telewizja Kablowa Krakow S.A.                                      Poland
 
Polska Telewizja Kablowa Lublin S.A.                                      Poland
 
Polska Telewizja Kablowa Operator Sp. z o.o.                              Poland
 
Polska Telewizja Kablowa S.A.                                             Poland
 
Polska Telewizja Kablowa Szczecin Sp. z o.o.                              Poland
 
Polska Telewizja Kablowa Warszawa S.A.                                    Poland
 
Poltelkab Sp. z o.o.                                                      Poland
 
Szczecinska Telewizja Kablowa Sp. z o.o.                                  Poland
 
Telkat Sp. z o.o.                                                         Poland
 
TV Kabel Sp. z o.o.                                                       Poland
 
TV-SAT Ursus Sp. z o.o.                                  Poland (in liquidation)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jun Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 13, 2012
By:
/s/ Jun WangJun Wang

Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15410]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1116-DR]


Minnesota; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1116-DR), dated June 1, 1996, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated June 1, 1996, the President declared a major disaster under the 
authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of Minnesota, resulting from flooding on March 14, 1996, and 
continuing, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a 
major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (``the Stafford Act''). I, 
therefore, declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of 
Minnesota.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby 
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes, such 
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and 
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance and Hazard 
Mitigation in the designated areas. Consistent with the requirement 
that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal funds provided 
under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance or Hazard Mitigation 
will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public 
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed 
six months after the date of this declaration.
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive 
Order 12148, I hereby appoint Gary Pierson of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this 
declared disaster.
    I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of Minnesota 
to have been affected adversely by this declared major disaster:

    Beltrami, Big Stone, Kittson, Koochiching, Marshall, Norman, 
Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Roseau and Traverse Counties for Public 
Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 96-15410 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit  23.03



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into ATMI, Inc.'s previously filed
Registration Statements File Nos. 33-77060, 33-93048, 333-49561, 333-56349,
333-55827, 333-82089 and 333-94641. We also consent to the application of our
report to the schedule labeled "Valuation and Qualifying Accounts" as of the
date and period covered by our report.

                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 25, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

PERSONAL

Sir William Castell
Chief Executive
Amersham plc

20 February 2003

Dear Bill

I am pleased to confirm that the Remuneration Committee has approved an
increase in your salary to L660,000 per annum with effect from 1 April 2003.
Additionally, in respect of the 2002 Bonus Scheme, the combination of
performance against financial targets and your personal objectives has produced
a bonus of L397,200.

I am also pleased to confirm your award of share options today with a nominal
value of approximately L1,200,000. The performance conditions will be similar
to those adopted last year.

With best wishes.

Yours sincerely

RICHARD LAPTHORNE
CHAIRMAN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Indus International, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K
           ffor the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in our
           by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                            Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                       23,554
<SECURITIES>                                                 15,596
<RECEIVABLES>                                                60,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (3,578)
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            123,062
<PP&E>                                                       37,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (21,426)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              150,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        64,453
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                         32
<OTHER-SE>                                                   86,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                150,785
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            195,477
<CGS>                                                       103,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               103,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             77,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            2,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              13,865
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          13,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 13,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 $0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 $0.38
        

</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                |
| /s/    Meg A. Gentle                                                                                                                            |
| Meg A. GentleChief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. |

----
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ J. Eric Pike

J. Eric PikeChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMay 10, 2010/s/ Anthony K. Slater

Anthony K. SlaterExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2010
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 02-05-126-CV

KENNETH WALDO AND ANGELA WALDO, 			      APPELLANTS

BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F

OF AARON WALDO, A MINOR CHILD	

	V.

PAMELA MUHS, INDIVIDUALLY AND	 				   APPELLEE

A/N/F OF AUSTIN MUHS, 

MINOR	

	------------

	FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On May 23, 2005, this court issued an order referring this dispute to mediation and ordering that mediation be completed by June 27, 2005. Thereafter, we extended the deadline two times, to November 17, 2005.  We further ordered as follows:

	If mediation fully resolves the issues in the case, the parties shall file a joint motion for dismissal within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation.  If the parties need more time to effectuate the terms of the settlement agreement, they must file a joint motion for extension of time to file a motion for dismissal.  The motion for extension is due within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation.

	On October 28, 2005, the court received a letter from Wade McMullen, the mediator, informing us that the parties had “fully settled” the case. Therefore, pursuant to our prior order, the parties were required to either file a joint motion to dismiss the appeal or file a joint motion for an extension of time to file a joint motion to dismiss the appeal.  The parties have not filed any such motion.

	On January 10, 2006, the court notified the parties by letter that the appeal is subject to dismissal on the court’s own initiative due to the parties’ failure to comply with the court’s prior order.2  Neither party has filed a response.  Branon, the assignee of appellee’s judgment, has filed a response, but it does not state sufficient grounds for continuing the appeal.

	Branon’s response states that the case has not been “fully settled” because appellants have not honored the memorandum of settlement agreed to during mediation.  Consequently, Branon asks the court to continue the appeal and hold appellants in contempt of the memorandum of settlement.  It appears that Branon’s sole reason for desiring to continue the appeal is to hold appellants in contempt in order to enforce the memorandum of settlement.  The memorandum of settlement is not, however, on file with this court.  Further, the remedies Branon seeks would be better pursued in the trial court.

	Accordingly, we deny Branon’s motion for contempt and dismiss the appeal.3 

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  February 16, 2006
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00480

- CV
Ford Motor Company v. Maria Cruz Lopez, Individually and as Representative of David Torres Cruz, and Incapacitated Adult
On Appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 2019

- DCL

- 02325

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 31, 2021