alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Xiangjun Liu, the Chief Executive Officer of
CHINA TMK BATTERY SYSTEMS INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.     The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of August, 2011.

/s/ Xiangjun
LiuXiangjun Liu Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and will be retained by
China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of CombiMatrix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on August 14, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Amit Kumar,Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1. The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | By:                              |
|----------|----------------------------------|
|     |                             |
|     | /s/ AMIT KUMAR, PH.D.            |
|     | Amit Kumar, Ph.D.                |
|     | Chief Executive Officer          |
| * * | *(Principal  Executive Officer)* |
|     | August 14,  2009            |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION

I, Adam Cegielski, certify that:

     1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Brownsville Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.


Dated: February 13, 2007           By: /s/ Adam Cegielski
                                   Adam Cegielski,
                                   Principal Accounting Officer
                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1  Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd a Nevada Corporation CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Louis Vucci, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Dated: August 16, 2010/s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.
Louis Vucci, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)       Exhibit 32.2  Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd a Nevada Corporation CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Victor Petrone, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Dated: August 16, 2010/s/ Victor Petrone
Victor Petrone 
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Kuber-Rambdas Investments LLC, 

Defendant. 

NO. CV-18-00470-PHX-GMS

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

 Pursuant to Plaintiff having accepted Defendant's offer of judgment, judgment is 

hereby entered against Defendant Kuber-Rambdas Investments LLC for Plantiff’s costs 

then accrued, and for further relief as stated within the Offer of Judgment. This action is 

hereby terminated. 

 Brian D. Karth

 District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

May 25, 2018 

s/ E. Aragon

 By Deputy Clerk

 

Case 2:18-cv-00470-GMS Document 25 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Henry Andrews, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 6, 2009    /s/ Henry Andrews Henry Andrews President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I N T H E S U P R E M E C O U R T STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 181 Jaime Urrabazo, Petitioner and Appellant
v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20240085 Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stephannie N. Stiel, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant; on brief. Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; on brief.1 Urrabazo v. State No. 20240085 Per Curiam. [¶1] Jaime Urrabazo appeals from an order denying his application for postconviction relief after pleading guilty to unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, second offense. At the evidentiary hearing on his application, he alleged he was under the influence of drugs when he pled guilty and claims he did not make a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to trial. The court found Urrabazo’s testimony was not credible and he failed to establish withdrawal of his guilty plea was necessary to correct a manifest injustice. [¶2] “The [district] court has discretion in finding whether a manifest injustice necessitating the withdrawal of a guilty plea exists, and we review the court's decision for abuse of discretion.” State v. Rangel , 2024 ND 96, ¶ 6, 6 N.W.3d 860 (citation omitted). Findings of fact made in a postconviction relief proceeding are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Urrabazo v. State , 2024 ND 67, ¶ 6, 5 N.W.3d 521. After a review of the record, we conclude the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and the court did not abuse its discretion by not allowing Urrabazo to withdraw his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 94-11157

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC STANLEY HARRISON, 

a/k/a Pablo & Peter,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. #:91-CV-1566-H

(3:91-CR-366-H)

- - - - - - - - - -

August 24, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric Stanley Harrison's motion for reinstatement of his

appeal is GRANTED. Harrison's motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

This court may authorize Harrison to proceed IFP on appeal

if he is economically eligible and the appeal is not frivolous. 

Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir.
No. 94-11157

-2-

1986). Harrison has demonstrated that he is economically

eligible to proceed IFP on appeal.

 Harrison argues that the district court violated Fed. R.

Crim. P. 32 by failing to determine if Harrison and his counsel

read and discussed the presentence report. A nonconstitutional

claim that could have been raised on direct appeal, but was not,

may not be raised in a collateral proceeding. United States v.

Shaid, 937 F.2d 228, 232 n.7 (5th Cir. 1991) (en banc), cert.

denied, 502 U.S. 1076 (1992). An alleged violation of Rule 32

does not raise a constitutional claim cognizable under § 2255. 

See United States v. Weintraub, 871 F.2d 1257, 1265-66 (5th Cir.

1989). Further, Harrison could have raised the issue on direct

appeal, but failed to do so. Harrison is not entitled to § 2255

relief based on the district court's alleged violation of Rule

32. This claim does not raise a nonfrivolous appellate issue.

Harrison argues for the first time on appeal that he was not

considered for a U.S.S.G. § 5K1, p.s., departure at sentencing.

This court need not address issues not considered by the district

court. "[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal are not

reviewable by this court unless they involve purely legal

questions and failure to consider them would result in manifest

injustice." Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir.

1991). The disposition of this issue would require the

resolution of factual questions and, thus, it is not subject to

review on appeal. Because Harrison has not raised an issue of

arguable merit, the appeal should be dismissed as frivolous. See
No. 94-11157

-3-

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir.

Rule 42.2.

APPEAL RE-INSTATED; IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:17-cv-04704-SPL Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 9 of 9
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Michael Brent Brown v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00042-CR

Trial court case number: B-140443-R

Trial court: 163rd District Court of Orange County

The State’s Request for Preparation of Reporter’s Record and Designation of Matters to 

Be Included, filed on February 20, 2015, is GRANTED. We note that reporter’s record of the 

plea of guilty dated October 31, 2014 has previously been filed. We ORDER the court reporter 

to file, within 30 days of the date of this order, the Announcement dated October 10, 2014 heard 

before the Honorable Dennis R. Powell and the Announcement dated September 26, 2014, heard 

before the Honorable Dennis R. Powell, or certify that those records do not exist.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/_Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 24, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29426-29427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14476]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, (42 U.S.C. 
9601-9675)

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States v. David B. Fisher, et al., Civil Action No. S92-00636M, was 
lodged on May 22, 1996 with the United States District Court for

[[Page 29427]]

the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. The proposed 
consent decree resolves the United States' claims against David B. 
Fisher for unreimbursed past costs incurred in connection with the 
Fisher-Calo Superfund Site located in Kingsbury, Indiana in return for 
a payment of $175,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. David B. Fisher, et al., DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-549A.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 1000 Washington Street, 203 Federal Building, 
Bay City, Michigan 48707; the Region 5 Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604; 
and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent 
decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In 
requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $5.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 96-14476 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rohat Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kwok-Keung Liu, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: September 10, 2010
By:
/s/ Kwok-Keung LiuKwok-Keung LiuPresident(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
**Exhibit
          No. 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
          OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
          TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
          2002**
 
 In
          connection with the Quarter Report of Rohat Resources, Inc., a Nevada
          corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
          “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies
          pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
          Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:
 
 (1)  the
          Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements
          of
          Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and
 
 (2)  the
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
          and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  Date:
                        September 12, 2008
                    By:
                    */s/Delara
                        Hussaini*Name:
                    Delara HussainiTitle:
                    Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman,
                      Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

K.S.R.W. AND D.D.W., III,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00211-CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2017DCM5649)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.