alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***Exhibit 31***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Ruairidh Campbell certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K (“Report”) of Montana Mining Corp.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and   

 

5. I have disclosed based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 9, 2008

 

/s/Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc.
(“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I,
Teja N. Shariff, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:




(1)  the
Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




August
      14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Teja
      N. ShariffTeja
      N. ShariffChief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                          [LOGO]

February 25, 1998
Via Facsimile & Certified Mail

Mr. Bob Arnot
I.C. Isaacs & Co., L.P.
3840 Bank Street
Baltimore, MD 21224-2522

   RE: International Exclusive License Agreement for I.C. Isaacs Europe S.L.
                                Retail Stores

Dear Bob:

Effective immediately for the current Contract Year in progress and 
subsequent Contract Years, this letter will confirm our agreement that BHPC 
Marketing, Inc. will base performance of this International Exclusive License 
Agreement on the payment of Monthly Guaranteed Royalty Payments rather than 
the achievement of Guaranteed Net Shipments. BHPC further agrees that in the 
event I.C. Isaacs Europe S.L. does not achieve the Guaranteed Target Net 
Shipments, BHPC Marketing, Inc. will not terminate subject agreement.

It is further stated that Section 7. Guarantees is amended as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

          Guaranteed                   Guaranteed    Guaranteed
          Target        Guaranteed     Annual        Monthly
          Net           Net            Royalty       Royalty
          Shipments     Shipments      Payments      Payments
          -----------   ----------     -----------   -----------  
<S>       <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
1998      $500,000      $500,000       $40,000.00    $2,500.00*
1999      $800,000      $800,000       $64,000.00    $5,333.33
2000      $1,000,000    $1,000,000     $80,000.00    $6,666.67

</TABLE>

*NOTE: Commencement March 1, 1998. Should you have any questions, please do 
       not hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,

BHPC Marketing, Inc.    The foregoing is agreed to and accepted as setting 
/s/ Don Garrison        for the agreement of the undersigned with respect 
------------------      to the matters set forth above.
   Don Garrison
   Vice President


                    by: /s/ Robert Arnot                             2/27/98
                        ---------------------------------------      --------
                        Robert Arnot, Chairman of the Board          DATE
                        and Co-CEO
                        I.C. Isaacs & Co., Inc. 


                    by: 
                        ---------------------------------------      --------
                        Gerald Lear, President/C.E.O.                DATE
                        I.C. Isaacs & Co., L.P.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND D. POLLOK, an individual,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

NORTHROP GRUMMAN HEALTH

PLAN, an employee benefit plan,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-56764

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-07006-JST-PJW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Josephine Staton Tucker, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2013

Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, BYBEE, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Pollok appeals from the district court’s findings of fact and

conclusions of law following a bench trial in his claim for long-term disability

FILED

AUG 07 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
benefits under an insurance policy governed by ERISA. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm the district court. 

The district court’s factual findings were not clearly erroneous. See

Pannebecker v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston, 542 F.3d 1213, 1217 (9th

Cir. 2008). It was not “illogical, implausible, or without support . . . in the record”

for the district court to find that: (1) the Northrop Grumman Health Plan (“the

Plan”) was in effect and available to Pollok when he became disabled; (2) there

was only one “Benefits Online” website containing the Summary Plan Description

(“SPD”); (3) the SPD vested discretionary authority in Unum as the Plan’s

administrator; and (4) the SPD provided that benefits payments could be offset

against certain benefits received from other sources. See United States v. Hinkson,

585 F.3d 1247, 1251 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc). 

Nor were the district court’s legal conclusions in error. See Pannebecker,

542 F.3d at 1217. The Plan vested discretionary authority in the Plan

administrator, and therefore it was proper for the district court to review the

benefits determination for abuse of discretion. See Abatie v. Alta Health & Life

Ins. Co., 458 F.3d 955, 969 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc). The district court also

properly concluded that Pollok’s benefits payments could be offset against certain

benefits received from other sources. The district court did not improperly place

2
the burden on Pollok to show that the Plan lacked offset provisions. See Zavora v.

Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 145 F.3d 1118, 1120 & n.2 (9th Cir. 1998) (explaining

that the burden of establishing the existence and terms of an ERISA plan is on the

insurer).

AFFIRMED. 

3
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14825]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Bureau of Consular Affairs

22 CFR Part 51

[Public Notice Number 2401]


Passports

AGENCY: Bureau of Consular Affairs, State.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends the regulations at 22 CFR Part 51, Subpart B 
to eliminate obsolete language regarding release of passport 
information.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 13, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Willaim B. Wharton, Director, Office of Passport Policy and Advisory 
Services, telephone (202) 955-0231.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Present regulations provide for the release 
of passport information in accordance with the provisions of the 
Privacy Act, the Freedom of Information Act and applicable provisions 
of 22 CFR Part 171 and Part 172. This rule is not expected to have 
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities under the 
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In addition, this rule does 
not impose information collection requirements under the provisions of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. This rule has been reviewed as 
required by E.O. 12778 and certified to be in compliance therewith. 
This rule is exempt from review under E.O. 12866, but has been reviewed 
internally by the Department to ensure consistency with the objectives 
thereof. In addition, as this amendment involves ``a matter relating to 
agency management,'' it is exempt from the requirement of notice and 
comment pursuant to section 553(a)(2) of the Administrative Procedures 
Act; and, accordingly, it may be promulgated as a final rule.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 51

    Passports and visas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 22 CFR Part 51 is 
amended as follows:

PART 51--PASSPORTS

Subpart B--Application

    1. The authority citation for section 51.33 is revised to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2658 and 3926; 5 U.S.C. 552, 552a.

    2. Section 51.33 is revised to read as follows:


Sec. 51.33   Release of passport information.

    Information in passport files is subject to the provisions of the 
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the Privacy Act. Release of this 
information may be requested in accordance with the implementing 
regulations set forth in Subchapter R, Part 171 or Part 172 of this 
title.

    Dated: May 20, 1996.
Mary A. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-14825 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-M
**Exhibit 21.1**

**MBO Inc.**

**US Liquids L.P. Holding Co.**

**US Liquids of La., L.P.**

**Re–Claim Environmental, Inc.**

**USL Management Limited Partnership**

**USL General Management, Inc.**

**GEM Management, Inc.**

**US Liquids Northeast, Inc.**

**U S Liquids of Connecticut, Inc.**

**Northern A–1 Sanitation Services, Inc.**

**The National Solvent Exchange Corp.**

**USL First Source, Inc.**

**USL Environmental Services, Inc.**

**U S Liquids of Pennsylvania, Inc.**

**Waste Stream Environmental, Inc.**

**Earth Blends, Inc.**

**U S Liquids of Detroit, Inc.**

**U S Liquids of Florida, Inc.**

**U S Liquids of Greater Chicago, Inc.**

**U S Liquids of Houston, L.L.C.**

**U S Liquids of Central Texas, L.L.C.**

**U S Liquids of Dallas, L.L.C.**

**USL Parallel Products of California**

**Parallel Products of Florida, Inc.**

**Parallel Products of Kentucky, Inc.**

**US Liquids of Texas, Inc.**

**US Liquids Terminal Services, Inc.**

**Romic Environmental Technologies Corporation**

**Waste Research and Recovery, Inc.**

**Canadian Liquids Processors, Ltd.**

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Indus International, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K
           ffor the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in our
           by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                                       <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                            Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<CASH>                                                       16,345
<SECURITIES>                                                 64,427
<RECEIVABLES>                                                39,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (3,991)
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            146,258
<PP&E>                                                       43,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (27,865)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              168,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        50,386
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                         33
<OTHER-SE>                                                  118,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                168,901
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            178,505
<CGS>                                                        98,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                98,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             83,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              38,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 14,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          23,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 23,837
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 $0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 $0.68


</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 7 

Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders and expanded 

research for treatment and cures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mrs. BIGGERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders 

and expanded research for treatment and cures. 

Whereas an estimated 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 people in the 

United States suffer from eating disorders, including 

anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder; 

Whereas eating disorders are more common among women, 

but an increasing number of men also suffer from these 

disorders; 

Whereas an estimated 0.5 to 3.7 percent of women in the 

United States will suffer from anorexia nervosa in their 

lifetimes, an estimated 1.1 to 4.2 percent of women in 

the United States will suffer from bulimia nervosa, and 

an estimated 2 to 5 percent of people in the United 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 7 IH 

States experience binge eating disorder during any given 

6-month period; 

Whereas anorexia nervosa has the highest premature mortality rate of any mental illness; 

Whereas eating disorders are associated with serious physical 

health consequences, including irregular heartbeats, heart 

disease and heart failure, kidney failure, osteoporosis, 

gastric rupture, peptic ulcer, tooth decay, obesity, gall 

bladder disease, diabetes, and death; 

Whereas eating disorders are also associated with substantial 

psychological problems, including depression, substance 

abuse, and suicide; and 

Whereas shame, guilt, and misunderstanding often afflict a 

person who suffers from an eating disorder, and prevent 

the treatment of the disorder: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages— 

3 (1) increasing public awareness of eating dis4 orders; 

5 (2) expanding research for treatment and cures; 

6 (3) broadening access to treatment; and 

7 (4) promoting healthful eating habits and a 

8 healthy body image. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### ATTORNEY GENERAL of Texas, Appellant, v. LaJohn F. WILSON, Appellee.

No. 09-93-195 CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Submitted April 28, 1994.

Decided June 23, 1994.

*691Leslie L. McCollom, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for appellant.

LaJohn F. Wilson, Port Arthur, for appel-lee.

Before WALKER, C.J., and BROOKSHIRE and BURGESS, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General of Texas, acting under Chapter 76 of the Texas Human Resources Code, initiated this paternity and support action against LaJohn Wilson. The master hearing the ease recommended a $2,652 judgment for retroactive child support, but also recommended the judgment “not to be abstracted or reported to IRS or credit bureau unless Resp falls 60 days delinquent in his monthly report.” The trial court rejected the Attorney General’s appeal from the master’s recommendations. The sole point of error contends the trial court erred in entering orders that prohibited the Attorney General from attempting to satisfy the judgment so long as the debtor timely made periodic payments. Wilson did not file a brief.

We agree with the Attorney General that under the rule of sovereign immunity, a suit brought to control State actions is not maintainable without legislative consent or statutory authorization. *Director of Dept. of Agriculture and Environment v. Printing Industries Ass’n of Texas,*600 S.W.2d 264 (Tex.1980); *Texas A & M University System v. University Book Store, Inc.,*683 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.App.—Waco 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.). This case is distinguishable from the cited cases in that the Attorney General instituted this suit and sought affirmative relief in the form of a money judgment.

The Attorney General argues the court’s order amounts to an injunction against performance of lawful functions by a state official in the absence of any pleadings requesting such relief. The trial court has the inherent power necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction and the enforcement of all its lawful orders. Tex.Gov’t Code Ann. § 21.001 (Vernon 1988). The order at issue in this ease exceeds the court’s power for a number of reasons. The court *sua sponte*grants the respondent affirmative relief in the absence of any pleading to support the judgment. All affirmative relief must be supported by written pleadings. Tex.R.Civ.P. 301. The suit *res*does not include speculative future non-judicial collection efforts, such as reporting the judgment to a credit bureau or the Internal Revenue Service. There is no enforcement action before the court, nor are wrongful collection efforts at issue. Abstracting a judgment is a ministerial act to be performed by the county clerk. Tex.PROP.Code Ann. § 52.004 (Vernon 1984). We hold the trial court exceeded its authority in ordering the judgment not be abstracted or reported.

Point of error one is sustained. We reform the judgment to delete the following language: ‘‘Judgment shall not be abstracted, or reported to IRS or credit bureau until obligor is in arrears 60 days on this order.” The judgment is affirmed as reformed.

AFFIRMED AS REFORMED.
| 1) | the      Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended      December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      31, 2009 | /s/      James K. B. Hesketh |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                 | James      K. B. Hesketh     |
|                                 | Chief      Executive Officer |

----

| 1) | the      Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended      December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      31, 2009 | /s/      David P. Suleski    |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                 | David      P. Suleski        |
|                                 | Chief      Financial Officer |
|                                 |                         |
|                                 |                         |
|                                 |                         |

----