alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joe Leoppky, of Search by Headlines.com Corp., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Search by Headlines.com Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 13, 2007

/s/ Joe LeoppkyJoe LeoppkyPresident, Secretary
and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer, Acting Principal Financial
Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer)

---
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51148, Inc., for the Quarter Ending April 30, 2006, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51148, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 51148, Inc. 

 
| Dated: June 8, 2006 |
|---------------------|

 

**51148, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10356 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MARCIA CARAWAY MORRISON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 224

- 1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marcia Caraway Morrison appeals her 70

- month prison sentence for wire fraud. She challenges the district court’s denial of a reduction of her offense level for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Our review is even more deferential than review for clear error, and we will affirm the district court’s decision u nless it is without foundation. United States v. Solis , 299 F.3d 420, 458 (5th Cir. 2002)

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10356 Document: 00513872540 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2017No. 16

- 10356

2 At her rearraignment, Morrison stated under oath that a written summary of the facts supporting her guilty plea w as true and co rrect. The summary stated that Morrison transferred $50,000 from a bank account without the owner’s knowledge or consent. Th e information to which Morrison pleaded guilty identified th is $50,000 transfer as the basis for the wire fraud

coun t

. During a presentence interview, however, Morrison stated that the $50,000 was a loan. Morrison thus denied conduc t comprisin g the offense of conviction

. S ee U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.1(A)); United States v. Galban , No. 93

- 3844, 1994 WL 399501, a t *1 (5th Cir. July 22, 1994) (unpublished ); see also 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.3 (unpublished opinion s issue before 1996 are precedent )

. T he district court’s ruling was not without foundation

. S ee Solis , 299 F.3d at 458

. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-10356 Document: 00513872540 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/13/2017
Exhibit 10.56
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Effective as of March 9, 2010 between
AFC Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) and
Henry Hope, III (Employee)
    Term of Agreement.
   Employment.
 Position.
 Time and Efforts.




---



##### 



Base Salary.
  Incentive Pay.
 Annual Plan.
 Target Incentive Pay.
 Payment of Incentive Pay.
 Termination of Employment.
 2




---



##### 



Equity Compensation.
  Employee Benefits.
 Life Insurance.
 Disability Insurance.
    3




---



##### 



Employee Medical Benefit.
 Other Benefits.
 Vacation.
 Paramount Provisions
   4




---



##### 



Business Expenses.
  Termination of Employment.
 Definitions.
      5




---



##### 



Termination upon Death or Disability.
 Termination by the Company without Cause or Employees Resignation for a Constructive
Discharge.
  6




---



##### 



Voluntary Termination by Employee or Termination for Cause.
    Change of Control, Change in Responsibilities.
 both
  7




---



##### 



Confidentiality and Non-Competition.
 Definitions
       8




---



##### 



Covenant Not-To-Disclose
         9




---



##### 



Covenant of Non-Disparagement and Cooperation
 Covenant Not-To-Induce
 Remedies
 Severability
 Ownership of Property
 10




---



##### 



No Defense
 Gross Up Payment
 11




---



##### 



Indemnification.
 Company Obligations
 Notice and Defense of Claim
 Survival
 Liability Insurance.
 Dispute Resolution.
 Agreement to Arbitrate
 12




---



##### 



Procedure
 Rights of Parties
 Employee Acknowledgment.
  13




---



##### 



Amendments.
  Successors.
  Assignment.
  Waiver.
  Severability.
  Survival.
  14




---



##### 



Entire Terms.
  Notices.
   
  
  Headings.
  Governing Law.
  15




---



##### 



Compliance with § 409A of the Code.
   16




---



##### 



COMPANY:
AFC ENTERPRISES, INC.By:
    /s/ John M. Cranor, IIIJohn M. Cranor, IIIChairman of the Board EMPLOYEE:/s/ Henry Hope, IIIHenry Hope, III 17
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David BergerDavid
      BergerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerMay
      5, 2009
Case 4:18-cv-00136-CKJ-PSOT Document 4 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6664

BASIR MATEEN RAZZAK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ACKOYT, Nurse Practitioner; A. GRIZZARD; CCS CORRECT CARE 

SOLUTIONS, MEDICAL AGENCY; FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER 

SERVICE BUREAU,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DR. RHOADES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, 

District Judge. (1:15-cv-01016-LCB-LPA)

Submitted: February 22, 2017 Decided: March 1, 2017

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Basir Mateen Razzak, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Basir Mateen Razzak seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007). In a civil case in which the United States is not a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after 

entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). When the 

appellant is incarcerated, the notice of appeal is considered 

filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison 

officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); 

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). The timely filing of 

a motion to alter or amend the judgment tolls the start of the 

time for filing a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(4)(A)(iv). “A motion to alter or amend a judgment must be 

filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment.” 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); In re GNC Corp., 789 F.3d 505, 512 (4th 

Cir. 2015).

The district court dismissed Razzak’s complaint on February 

22, 2016. Razzak filed a motion to alter or amend that was 

dated March 4, 2016, but was not filed in the district court 

until March 31, 2016. The record does not conclusively reveal 

when Razzak delivered this motion to prison officials for 

mailing. Razzak’s notice of appeal was dated April 18, 2016, 
3

well after the expiration of the appeal period, unless the 

motion to alter or amend tolled the start of that period.

Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of 

allowing the district court to determine when the motion to 

alter or amend was delivered to prison officials for mailing. 

The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court 

for further consideration.

REMANDED
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0430

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF: S.D., Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classifi ed for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Jennifer B. Lint, District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 6 2024

03/06/2024
Case Number: DA 22-0430
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                                          |   |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: September 3, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Kwok-Keung Liu                                            |   |
|                     |   | Kwok-Keung Liu                                                |   |
|                     |   | President                                                     |   |
|                     |   | (principal executive officer and principal financial officer) |   |
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 (the
Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn
|Name:              |  | Arthur H. Penn         
|Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:              |  | August 5, 2015
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Victor Sylvie,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR01-00707-001-PHX-PGR

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing

and detention hearing were waived by defendant through defense counsel. The Court finds

probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged

in the petition.

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant is detained as flight risk and danger, pending

further revocation proceedings. Pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant has failed to show he

is not a flight risk or a danger.

DATED this 22nd day of October, 2013.

Case 2:01-cr-00707-PGR Document 65 Filed 10/23/13 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14975]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; X Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 29, 1996, pursuant to Sec. 6(a) 
of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 
U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the X Consortium, Inc., has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the changes are as 
follows: Draper Laboratory, Arlington, VA; Smithsonian Astrophysical 
Observatory, Cambridge, MA; and TriTeal Corp., Carlsbad, CA have been 
added to the venture. AT&T Global Information Solutions, West Columbia, 
SC; Compagnie Europeene des Techniques de l'Ingeniere Assistee, Toulon, 
FRANCE; O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Tatung Science and 
Technology, Milpitas, CA; and Visual Information Technologies, Inc., 
Richardson, TX have withdrawn from the venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and the X Consortium, Inc., intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On September 15, 1993, the X Consortium, Inc., filed its original 
notification pursuant to Sec. 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Sec. 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 1993 (58 FR 59737).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-14975 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14466]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than June 24, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Joe D. and Melody A. Balentine, Raymore, Missouri; to acquire an 
additional 3.3 percent, for a total of 25.6 percent, of the voting 
shares of Drexel Bancshares, Inc., Drexel, Missouri, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Bank 10, Belton, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 4, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-14466 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Infrastructure Materials Corp. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully
complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.











Dated:
February 11, 2011








/s/ Todd D.
Montgomery


Todd D.
Montgomery


Chief
Executive Officer


Infrastructure
Materials Corp.








Dated:
February 11, 2011








/s/ Rakesh
Malhotra


Rakesh
Malhotra


Chief
Financial Officer


Infrastructure
Materials Corp.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infrastructure Material Corp. and will be retained by Infrastructure Materials
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 14483 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:11

- cv - 01112

- TJC

- TEM HOWARD B. WALD, JR. Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign profit corporation, Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (May 20, 2014) Before CARNES , Chief Judge, DUBINA and SILER, * Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

* Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals sitting by designation.

Case: 13-14483 Date Filed: 05/20/2014 Page: 1 of 32 Appellant Howard B. Wald, Jr., brought this bad faith claim against State
Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) , which insured the driver responsible for an accident injuring Wald. The estate of the late driver, Sam Gus Felos , escaped liability beyond State Farm’s policy limits despite a tort judgment against it because Wald failed to comply with the Florida probate code’s statute of limitations. See Fla. Stat. § 733.702(1) (barring claims against estates “unless filed in the probate proceeding on or before the later of” three months after notice by publication or thirty days after service of notice, where service is required), 733.702(4)(b) (excluding from the statute of lim itations claims up to the policy limits of a casualty insurance policy). The district court granted summary judgment because, under Florida law, a third party bad faith claim is derivative of the insured’s claim, and an insured suffers no injury supportin g his or another’s bad faith claim whe n he is not exposed to liability beyond his policy limits. Perera v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. , 35 So. 3d 893, 902 (Fla. 2010); Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Cope , 462 So. 2d 459, 461 (Fla. 1985) ; see also May v. Ill. Nat’l Ins. Co. , 190 F.3d 1200, 120 2 (11th Cir. 1999) (applying Florida law and concluding that “[i]f a deceased insured’ s estate is not obligated to pay the excess judgment, then no

cause of action for bad faith exists”).

Case: 13-14483 Date Filed: 05/20/2014 Page: 2 of 33 After reviewing the record and reading the parties ’ briefs, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm based upon the district court’s well

- reasoned order filed on July 25, 2013

. AFFIRMED. 1

1 This case was originally scheduled for oral argument but was removed from the oral argument calendar by unanimous agreement of the panel under 11th. C ir. R. 34

- 3(f).

Case: 13-14483 Date Filed: 05/20/2014 Page: 3 of 3