Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40450 Su m m ar yC al endar
K E R R YJ E R M A IN W IL L IA M S , Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant
v. COM M I S S I ONER , D efen da n t - A pp el l ee

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 6: 09- C V
- 47 B ef ore D eM O S S , P R A D O , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * K erry Jerm ai n W i l l i am s, T exas pr iso n e r # 8652 21, app eal s t h e di st ri ct c o ur t ’ s di s m i s s alof

hi s 42 U . S. C. § 198 3 c o m pl ai ntw hi c h he f i l e d a ga i ns tPaul K i el , a T exas P arol e C om m i ssi on er. W i l l i am s al l eged i n hi s c om pl ai n tt h at K i el h a dv io la te dh is e q u a l p r o te c tio n a n dd u e p r o c e s s rig h ts b ytr e a tin gh im di f ferentl y t h an other i n m ates w i t h regard t o parol e deci si on s. W i l l i am s f u rt h er c o m p la in e dth a t K ie l d e n ie dh im p a r o le b a s e do n e r r o n e o u s in fo r m a tio n . United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 26, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-40450 Document: 00511012323 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/26/2010N o. 09- 40450

2 W i l l i am s’ s ap pel l ate bri ef does n otadd ress t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s r eason s f or di s m i s s i ng hi s c l ai m s . I ns t e ad , he e r r o ne o us l y andc o nc l us o r i l y as s e r t s t hatt he di st ri ctcourterr ed i n gran t in gth e d efen da n tabsol u t e i m m u n i t y f rom de c l ar at o r y andi nj unc t ive rel i ef. Al t ho ugh w e a pply l e s s s t r i nge nts t and ar ds to p a r tie s p r o c e e d in gp r o s e th a n to p a r tie s re p r e s e n te db yco u n s e l a n dlib e r a lly c o ns t r ue b r i e fs o f

pr o s e l i t i ga nt s , pr o s e pa r t i e s m us t s t i l l br i e f t he i s s ue s a nd rea so n a b ly c o m p ly w ithth e re q u ire m e n ts o f F e d e ra l R u le o f A pp ell ate Procedu re 2 8 . G r antv . Cue l lar , 5 9 F. 3d5 23 , 5 24 ( 5t h Ci r . 1 99 5) . W e w i l lnot rai se a nd d is c u s s le g a l is s u e s th a t W illia m s h a s fa ile d to a s s e r t; w h e n a n a p p e lla n t fa ils t o i de nt i f

y anye r r o ri n the d i s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s a nalys i s , i ti s t he s am e a s i f t he a p p e lla n t h a d n o t a p p e a le dth a t ju d g m e n t. B rin k m a n n v. D a lla s Co u n ty D ep u ty S h erif f A bn er , 81 3 F . 2 d 7 4 4 , 7 4 8 (5th C i r. 1 9 8 7 ). B eca u se W i l l i a m s h a s fa i l ed to b r ie f a n yis s u e , h is a p p e a l is fr iv o lo u s a n dis d is m is s e d . S ee5 T H C IR . R . 42. 2. T h e d i stri ct cou rt’ s d i sm i ssa l of W i l l i a m s’ s § 19 8 3 com p l a i n t p u rsu a n t t o 2 8 U . S . C . § 19 1 5 A (b)( 1 ) a n dthis cou rt’ s d i sm i ssa lof th i s ap p ea las frivo l ou s bo th c o u n t a s s tr ik e s fo rp u r p o s e s o f 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 (g). Se eAde pegb a v . Ham m o ns , 10 3 F. 3d3 83 , 3 87
- 88 ( 5t h Ci r . 1 99 6) . W i l l i am s i s c aut i o ne d t hati f he a c c u mu l a t e s t h r e e s t r i k e s , h e w i l ln o l o n g e rb e a l l o w e dt o p r o c e e di n f o r ma pa u peri s i n an y civi lact i on or ap pea lf i l ed w h i l e h e i s i n carcer ated or detai n ed i n any fa ci l i t y unl es s he i s und eri m m i nentdangerof s er i ous physi c ali nj ury. S ee§ 1 9 1 5 (g). DI S M I S S ED ; S ANC T I ON WARNI NG I S S UED . Case: 09-40450 Document: 00511012323 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/26/2010