alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.6
 INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
 CORILLIAN CORPORATION
 AND
 
 CORILLIAN CORPORATION  INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
 This Indemnification Agreement (this ) is made as of January 23, 2001, by and between
Corillian Corporation, an Oregon corporation (the ), and the individual whose name appears
below the word Indemnitee on the signature page of this Agreement (the ). In
consideration of the services of the Indemnitee to the Company, and to induce the Indemnitee to
continue to serve as an officer and/or director, the Company and the Indemnitee agree as follows:
 R E C I T A L S
 A.
 B.
 C.
 Definitions
  Agent
 Corporate Transaction
 Expenses Expenses




---



##### 



Indemnified Costs
 Potential Corporate Transaction
    Proceeding
 Indemnification
 Indemnification in Third Party Actions.
 Indemnification in Proceedings By or In the Name of the Company .
 Partial Indemnification .
 Indemnification Hereunder Not Exclusive.
 Indemnification of Indemnified Costs of Successful Party.




---



##### 



Indemnified Costs Advanced .
 Limitations on Indemnification .
      Presumptions
 Presumption Regarding Standard of Conduct .
 Determination of Right to Indemnification .
 Burden .




---



##### 



Standard .
 Other Agreements
 Corporate Transaction.
 Maintenance of Liability Insurance .
 Affirmative Covenant of the Company .
 Indemnitee Named as Insured .
 Effect of this Agreement on Employment Agreement .
 Nature of Rights; Separability .




---



##### 



Savings Clause .
 Repayment of Indemnified Costs .
 Repayment .
 Indemnification Procedure
 Notice .
 Company Participation .
 Settlement.
 Subrogation .




---



##### 



Miscellaneous Provisions
 Amendments; Waivers .
 Integration .
 Interpretation; Governing Law .
 Headings .
 Counterparts .
 Successors and Assigns .
 Expenses; Legal Fees .
 Representation by Counsel; Interpretation .
 Time is of the Essence .
 Notices .
 If to Corillian Corporation:
    
    If to the Indemnitee:3400 NW John Olsen Place
    
    At the Indemnitees most recent address on the booksHillsboro, OR 97124
    
    and records of the Company or at such other addressAttention: General Counsel
    
    as Indemnitee indicates to the Company




---



#####
EXHIBIT
      32.1




Certificate
      of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Oasys Mobile,
      Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Douglas B. Dyer, the Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
      (d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company
      as
      of and for the periods presented in the Report.






Date:      
April
              2, 2007
            /s/
              Douglas B.
              DyerDouglas B. DyerChief Executive
              Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

December 18, 2020

b1215

Order 

Clerk

December 18, 2020

161837(20)

MICHIGAN ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED

AMERICANS, DETROIT/DOWNRIVER

CHAPTER OF THE A. PHILIP RANDOLPH

INSTITUTE, CHARLES ROBINSON, GERARD

McMURRAN, and JIM PEDERSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 161837

COA: 354429

Ct of Claims: 2020-000108-MM

SECRETARY OF STATE and ATTORNEY

GENERAL,

Defendants,

and

SENATE and HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,

Proposed Intervenor Defendants,

and

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and

MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY,

Proposed Intervenor

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s August 28, 

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
Exhibit
13.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Ungava Mines Inc. for the year
ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
 The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
 The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.





Date:
March 20, 2008





/s/ Glen
Erikson


Glen
Erikson, and Person standing in place of the


Chief
Executive Officer of Ungava Mines Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the
registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request
EX-10.20







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.20




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

MANAGEMENT STOCK PURCHASE PLAN





     This Amendment to the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan (the
“Plan”) is made on this 10th day of December, 2008.



     WHEREAS, LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) established the Plan in order to provide a
proprietary interest in the Company through stock ownership;



     WHEREAS, Section 12 of the Plan provides that the board of directors of the Company may amend
the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in order to comply with Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the following, effective January
1, 2009:


1. Notwithstanding the applicable provisions of this Plan regarding timing of distribution of
payments, the following special rules shall apply in order for this Plan to comply with section
409A of the Code: (i) to the extent any distribution is to a “specified employee” (as defined under
section 409A of the Code) and to the extent such applicable provisions of section 409A of the Code
and the regulations thereunder require a delay of such distributions by a six-month period after
the date of such employee’s separation from service with the Company, no such distribution shall be
made prior to the date that is six months after the date of the employee’s separation from service
with the Company, and (ii) any such delayed payments shall be paid to the employee in a single lump
sum within five business days after the end of the six-month delay.



2. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary in this Plan, to the extent that any benefit
under this Plan is payable upon an event involving an employee’s cessation of services, such
payment(s) shall not be made unless such event constitutes a “Separation from Service” pursuant to
the default definition in section 1.409A-1(h) of the U.S. Treasury Regulations.



3. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any refunds due under this arrangement upon a
separation from service shall be made as soon as administratively feasible following such
separation from service (the “payment date”), but in any event shall be paid no later than the
later of (i) the end of the calendar year that includes the payment date or (ii) the date that is
21/2 months after the payment date. For these purposes, in the event a payment is subject to a
six-month delay to comply with Section 409A of the Code, the payment date shall be considered the
end of the six-month delay.



4. To the extent of any compliance issues under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, the Plan shall
be construed in such a manner so as to comply with the requirements of such provision so as to
avoid any adverse tax consequences to the Participant.




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Company has executed this Amendment on the
date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
John P. Bumpus 	 
	 	 	Its: 	Executive
Vice President 

and Chief Administrative Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT**

**TO SARBANES-OXLEY**

**SECTION 302**

 

I, Richard M. Lerner, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: March 25, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
listed below of Indus International, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Indus International,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2002:

1.  Registration Statement Number 333-36995 on Form S-8
2.  Registration Statement Number 333-44438 on Form S-8
3.  Registration Statement Number 333-64632 on Form S-8
4.  Registration Statement Number 333-70475 on Form S-8
5.  Registration Statement Number 333-104028 on Form S-3


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                      OF
                        PRIVATEBANCORP CAPITAL TRUST I


     THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF PRIVATEBANCORP CAPITAL TRUST I (the "Trust"),
is being duly executed and filed by Wilmington Trust Company, a Delaware banking
corporation, Ralph B. Mandell, Gary L. Svec and Lisa M. O'Neill, each an
individual, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

1.   NAME.  The name of the business trust formed hereby is PrivateBancorp
     Capital Trust I.

2.   DELAWARE TRUSTEE.  The name and business address of the trustee of the
     Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
     North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware  19890-0001,
     Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

3.   EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective on December
     19, 2000.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of Trust
in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

                                             WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as
                                             trustee


                                             By: /s/ Patricia A. Evans
                                                Name:  Patricia A. Evans
                                                Title: Senior Financial
                                                        Services Officer

                                             /s/ Ralph B. Mandell, as Trustee
                                             Name: Ralph B. Mandell

                                             /s/ Gary L. Svec, as Trustee
                                             Name: Gary L. Svec

                                             /s/ Lisa M. O'Neill, as Trustee
                                             Name: Lisa M. O'Neill
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0107

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MICHAEL ALLEN ZEIMER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion or extension to time, and good cause 

appearing. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and 

including October 28, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply brief 

on appeal.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2021

09/20/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0107
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132072 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132072 

 COA: 267825 

Wayne CC: 83-006566-01

FREDERICK JEROME SMITH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
listed below of Indus International, Inc. of our reports dated June 12, 2006,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Indus International,
Inc., Indus International, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Indus International, Inc., included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2006:

1.  Registration Statement Number 333-36995 on Form S-8

2.  Registration Statement Number 333-44438 on Form S-8

3.  Registration Statement Number 333-64632 on Form S-8

4.  Registration Statement Number 333-70475 on Form S-8

5.  Registration Statement Number 333-104028 on Form S-3

6.  Registration Statement Number 333-107553 on Form S-8

7.  Registration Statement Number 333-107640 on Form S-3

8.  Registration Statement Number 333-112434 on Form S-8

9.  Registration Statement Number 333-113143 on Form S-3

10. Registration Statement Number 333-118888 on Form S-3

11. Registration Statement Number 333-120297 on Form S-8

                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
June 12, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Paul McDonald, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Deerfield Resources, Ltd. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Paul McDonald  Name: Paul McDonald Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer Date: May 9, 2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2019

No. 04-18-00836-CV

Allan W. MAJESKI,

Appellant

v.

FROST BANK,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI00427

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant is an inmate acting pro se in a civil suit. We previously determined that 

Appellant may proceed without payment of costs. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.

§ 14.002(a); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c); TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. 

The clerk’s record has been filed; the reporter’s record is due on February 25, 2019. 

On February 19, 2019, Appellant requested a free copy of the appellate record. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. This court will mail Appellant a copy of the clerk’s and 

reporter’s records after the reporter’s record is filed. 

Appellant’s brief will be due THIRTY-FIVE DAYS after the appellate record is 

complete. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 795 

Honoring the people of Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and the Flight 93 Ambassadors for their efforts in creating the Flight 93 temporary memorial 

and encouraging the completion of the National Park Service Flight 

93 National Memorial by the 10th anniversary of September 11, 2001. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Mr. SHUSTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the people of Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and the 

Flight 93 Ambassadors for their efforts in creating the 

Flight 93 temporary memorial and encouraging the completion of the National Park Service Flight 93 National 

Memorial by the 10th anniversary of September 11, 

2001. 

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, the passengers and crew 

of United Flight 93 courageously gave their lives, thereby 

thwarting a planned attack on our Nation’s Capital; 

Whereas the Flight 93 crash site is a profound national symbol of American patriotism and spontaneous leadership of 

citizen heroes; 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 795 IH 

Whereas the people of Shanksville, Pennsylvania, came together as a community to protect the sacred ground and 

construct a temporary memorial where Flight 93 crashed 

on September 11th; 

Whereas the Flight 93 Ambassadors, created by members of 

the Shanksville community after the tragic events of September 11th, have exhibited selfless dedication and leadership by preserving and recounting the heroic story of 

the brave intervention of the passengers and crew against 

the terrorists to the memorial’s visitors; and 

Whereas in large part due to the efforts of the community 

and Flight 93 Ambassadors, Congress authorized the creation of a permanent national memorial as part of the 

National Park System under Public Law 107–226, the 

Flight 93 National Memorial Act: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the Shanksville, Pennsylvania, com3 munity and Flight 93 Ambassadors for— 

4 (A) their foresight, dedication, and leader5 ship in protecting the Flight 93 temporary me6 morial, the preservation and sharing of the he7 roic story of the brave intervention of the pas8 sengers and crew against terrorists; and 

9 (B) their efforts to establish a permanent 

10 national memorial to Flight 93; and 

11 (2) encourages the Secretary of the Interior and 

12 the National Park Service to complete the Flight 93 

13 National Memorial, as authorized by the Flight 93 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 795 IH 

1 National Memorial Act, by the 10th anniversary of 

2 the September 11th attacks. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Gurkirpa Hotel Group LLC, 

Defendant. 

NO. CV-18-00943-PHX-DJH

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

 Pursuant to Plaintiff having accepted Defendant's offer of judgment, judgment is 

hereby entered against Defendant Gurkirpa Hotel Group, LLC for Plaintiff’s costs then 

accrued, and for further relief as stated within the Offer of Judgment. This action is 

hereby terminated. 

 Brian D. Karth

 District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

May 9, 2018 

s/ A. Duran

 By Deputy Clerk

 

Case 2:18-cv-00943-DJH Document 20 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 1