alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Joe Loeppky, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director of Search By Headlines.com Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Search By Headlines.com Corp. for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Search By Headlines.com Corp.

 

Dated: April 4, 2007

 

 

/s/ Joe Loeppky

Joe Loeppky

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Search By Headlines.com Corp. and will be retained by Search By Headlines.com Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

CW1143073.1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Wilson Cheung



Wilson Cheung, President and Chairman

February 16, 2007
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

 Defendant. 

 CR 18-00223-TUC-RCC (BPV) 

 ORDER 

 

 

 The Court has reviewed the Defendant's Motion to Exceed Page Limitations, and 

good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Exceed Page Limitations (Doc. 154) is granted 

and the requested pleading, Motion for Sanctions Due to Serious Ethical Violations 

(lodged at Doc. 155) shall be filed. 

 Dated this 14th day of January, 2019. 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 159 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

– 1 –

REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

CAIR LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

Lena F. Masri (D.C. Bar # 100019) (seeking pro hac vice admission)

Email: lmasri@cair.com

Gadeir I. Abbas* (VA Bar # 81161) (seeking pro hac vice admission)

Email: gabbas@cair.com

Carolyn M. Homer (D.C. Bar # 1049145) (seeking pro hac vice admission)

Email: chomer@cair.com

453 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20003

Phone: (202) 742-6420

Fax: (202) 379-3317

KELLY / WARNER, PLLC

8283 N. Hayden Road, Suite 229

Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 

Raeesabbas Mohamed, Esq. (AZ Bar # 027418)

Email: raees@kellywarnerlaw.com

Phone: (480) 331-9397

Fax: (866) 961-4984

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

* Licensed in VA, not in D.C.

Practice limited to federal matters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

PHOENIX DIVISION

AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE

and DR. HATEM BAZIAN 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY; ARIZONA 

BOARD OF REGENTS; and MARK 

BRNOVICH, in his official capacity as 

Attorney General of Arizona

Defendants.

Case No. CV-18-670-PHX-JJT

REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION HEARING
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

– 2 –

REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

Plaintiffs, American Muslims for Palestine and Dr. Hatem Bazian (collectively 

“Plaintiffs”), by and through undersigned counsel, requests that the Court set a 

hearing on its Application For Preliminary Injunction filed concurrently herewith. 

Plaintiffs respectfully request the hearing be scheduled no later than the week of 

March 26, in order to facilitate an order prior to the April 3, 2018 event at Arizona 

State University which is the subject of Plaintiffs’ application.

Dated this 2nd day of March, 2018.

 CAIR LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

By /s/ Lena F. Masri 

 Lena F. Masri (D.C. Bar No. 100019)

 seeking pro hac vice admission) Gadeir I. Abbas* (VA Bar No. 81161) 

 (seeking pro hac vice admission)

 Carolyn M. Homer (D.C. Bar No. 1049145)

 (seeking pro hac vice admission)

 453 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, DC 20003

 Phone: (202) 742-6420

 Fax: (202) 379-3317

* Licensed in VA, not in D.C.

Practice limited to federal matters

 KELLY / WARNER, PLLC

By /s/ Raees Mohamed 

 Raees Mohamed, Esq. (AZ Bar # 027418)

 8283 N. Hayden Road, Suite 229

 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258

 Phone: (480) 331-9397

 Fax: (866) 961-4984 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Order entered September 17, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00076-CV

VENKY VENKATRAMAN, Appellant

V.

STEPHEN D. SKINNER, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968-V

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 16, 2021 motion for an extension 

of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time

to October 29, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

G.A., J.A., A.S., J.S., And J.S.,

Children. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00187

- C V

Appeal from the

65th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021DCM6989)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal. It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent

for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other order with respect thereto. We further order this

decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023.

GINA M. PALAFOX , J ustice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7191

MARK D. HUGHES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROY COOPER, North Carolina Attorney General,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cv-00271)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark D. Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mark D. Hughes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hughes has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
H. Res. 727 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 1, 2009. 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the deadliest of all gynecological 

cancers, and the reported mortality of ovarian cancer is 

increasing over time; 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the 5th leading cause of cancer 

deaths among women in the United States; 

Whereas the mortality rate for ovarian cancer has not significantly decreased in the almost 40 years since the ‘‘War 

on Cancer’’ was declared; 

Whereas all women are at risk for ovarian cancer, and 90 

percent of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer do not 

have a family history that puts them at higher risk; 

Whereas the Pap test is sensitive and specific to the early detection of cervical cancer, but not to ovarian cancer; 

Whereas there is currently no reliable early detection test for 

ovarian cancer; 

Whereas many people are unaware that the symptoms of 

ovarian cancer often include bloating, pelvic or abdominal 

pain, difficulty eating or feeling full quickly, and urinary 

symptoms, among several other symptoms that are easily 

confused with other diseases; 
2 

•HRES 727 EH 

Whereas the first national consensus statement on ovarian 

cancer symptoms was developed in June 2007 to provide 

consistency in describing symptoms to make it easier for 

women to learn and remember them; 

Whereas due to the lack of a reliable screening test, 75 percent of ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in an advanced stage when the five-year survival rate is below 45 

percent; 

Whereas if ovarian cancer is diagnosed and treated at an 

early stage before the cancer spreads outside of the 

ovary, the survival rate is as high as 90 percent; 

Whereas there are factors that are known to reduce the risk 

for ovarian cancer and play an important role in the prevention of the disease; 

Whereas awareness and early recognition of ovarian cancer 

symptoms are currently the best way to save women’s 

lives; 

Whereas the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance, during the 

month of September, holds a number of events to increase public awareness of ovarian cancer; and 

Whereas the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer 

Awareness Month should be promoted to increase the 

awareness of the public regarding the cancer: Now, therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 727 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses 

support for greater awareness of ovarian cancer. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, John M. Pritchard, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that the
Quarterly Report of Gold Run Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Gold Run Inc.


 Date:    November 19, 2007                      /s/ John M. Pritchard
                                                 ---------------------
                                                 John M. Pritchard
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)


I, Ernest Cleave, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that the Quarterly
Report of Gold Run Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Gold Run Inc.


Date: November 19, 2007

                                                /S/ Ernest Cleave
                                                -----------------
                                                Ernest Cleave
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                (Principal Financial Officer)
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1315   Filed 09/14/21   Page 1 of 5

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1315   Filed 09/14/21   Page 2 of 5

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1315   Filed 09/14/21   Page 3 of 5

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1315   Filed 09/14/21   Page 4 of 5

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1315   Filed 09/14/21   Page 5 of 5
Unassociated Document


    
      Exhibit
10.30

       

    

    100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT

    


    This 100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) dated this
15th
day of February 2009, is entered into by and between Dot VN, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Maker”) and Lee Johnson (the
“Holder”).

    


    Recitals

    


    
      	
              A.

            	
              Maker
      made, executed and delivered to the order of Holder that certain 100%
      Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated August 14, 2008, in the
      principal sum of $2,160,766.52 with interest payable at the rate of 8% per
      annum, which Note is due and payable on February 15, 2009 (the “Due
      Date”).

            


    

    


    
      	
              B.

            	
              Maker
      and Holder desire to modify the terms of the Note to extend the Due
      Date.

            


    

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

    


    Agreement

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      Due Date of the Note is extended thirty days to March 17, 2009, at which
      time the entire amount of principal plus accrued interest shall be due and
      payable in full.

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              Except
      as provided herein, the terms and provisions of the Note shall remain
      unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect; the Note as modified
      and amended hereby is ratified and confirmed in all
    respects.

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              The
      terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
      of the parties hereto, their heirs, representatives, successors and
      assigns

            


    

    


    IN
WITHNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is effective as of the date first above
written.

     

    
      	
              “MAKER”

              Dot VN, Inc.

               

               

            	 	 	“HOLDER”
      

              Thomas
      Johnson

              


              


            	 
	
              /s/
      Thomas Johnson

            	 	 	
              /s/
      Lee Johnson

            	 
	
              By:
      Thomas Johnson

            	 	 	
              By:
      Lee Johnson

            	 
	
              Its:
      CEO
Exhibit 32.1(a)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 Date: February 26, 2009
    By:
    /s/    BRUCE A. WILLIAMSONBruce A. WilliamsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APR 13, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________________

No. 04-12918

_____________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00009 CR-FTM-29-DNF 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY BERTUCCI,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(April 13, 2006)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Bertucci (“Defendant”) was convicted of conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute 100 kg or less of marijuana. Defendant attacks his
2

conviction on two grounds. First, Defendant argues the district court erred by

denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his residence. Because this

evidence was obtained pursuant to a search warrant supported by recent evidence

of trash pulls and an indictment that corroborated older information that Defendant

was distributing drugs from his house, the evidence was properly admitted. 

Second, Defendant argues he is entitled to a new trial, because the evidence at trial

established multiple conspiracies, not the single conspiracy indicted. Assuming

that the evidence did establish multiple conspiracies, Defendant would still not be

entitled to reversal of his conviction, because he has not shown substantial

prejudice. See U.S. v. Coy, 19 F.3d 629, 633 (11th Cir. 1994). Third, Defendant

challenges his sentence, arguing the district court committed reversible

constitutional error under United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). The

government concedes this error. And we accept that there is harmful error. We

affirm Defendant’s conviction, but vacate the sentence and remand for

resentencing. 

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, David
M. Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended February 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  April
      10, 2008
              By:
              /s/ David
      M. MorseDavid
      M. Morse
                Co-President and Chief Executive Officer




I,
Desiree Mejia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended February 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  April
      10, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Desiree
      MejiaDesiree
      Mejia
                Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer


Signed
originals of these written statements required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




These
certifications accompany the Form 10-QSB to which they relate, are not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
this Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN CPAs(ISR), INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-37804), pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan; theRegistration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-55958), pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000Employee Stock Purchase Plan; the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-67070), pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan; and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-86878),pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, each of Vyyo Inc., of our report dated February 13, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Vyyo Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN CPAs (ISR) 

A member of PricewaterhouseCoopersInternational Limited 

 

Tel Aviv, Israel 

February 13, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 19-0424

OLD HICKORY CONSTRUCTION, INC., a

North Carolina Corporation,

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

BVLT, INC., f/k/a BITTERROOT VALLEY ) PREJUDICE

LOG & TIMBER, INC., a Montana Corporation; )

and STEVEN MILLER, an individual, )

Defendants and Appellants,

)

)

)

)

BVLT, INC., f/k/a BITTERROOT VALLEY )

LOG & TIMBER, INC., a Montana Corporation )

and STEVEN MILLER, an individual, )

Third Party Plaintiffs,

)

)

)

v. )

)

ARTHUR L. TURNER, ROBYN S. TURNER, )

and MONTANA CUSTOM LOG HOMES, )

INC., )

)

Third Party Defendants. )

)

1

04/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0424
MONTANA CUSTOM LOG HOMES, INC., )

)

Counterclaimant, )

)

v. )

)

STEVE MILLER, )

)

Counterclaim Defendant. )

TIMOTHY BRIGHTMAN and KAREN )

BRIGHTMAN, )

)

Plaintiffs and Appellees, )

)

v. )

)

ARTHUR TURNER, individually, and )

MONTANA CUSTOM LOG HOMES, INC., a )

Montana Corp., BVLT, INC., f/k/a Bitterroot )

Valley Log & Timber, Inc., and STEVE )

MILLER, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Upon review of the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice and for good cause

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice

and each party is to bear their own expense.

DATED this day of , 2020.

13863/10 (lhm)

LAWDDOCS \DOCS\CLIENTFL11386310101ORD101003806 WPD

cc: William V. Ballew

Jane E. Cowley

Tim E. Dailey

By: 

2

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 15 2020