alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13657]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


PEACE CORPS

Information Collection Requests Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Peace Corps.

ACTION: Notice of public use form review request to the Office of 
Management and Budget.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Associate Director for Management invites comments on 
information collection requests as required pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). This notice announces that the 
Peace Corps has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a 
request to approve the continued use of the Peace Corps Volunteer 
Application. A copy of the information collection may be obtained from 
Stuart Moran, Office of Volunteer Recruitment and Selection, United 
States PEACE CORPS, 1990 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20526. Mr. Moran 
may be contacted by telephone at (202) 606-2080. Comments on these 
forms should be addressed to Victoria Becker Wassmer, Desk Officer, 
Office of Management and Budget, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503.

Information Collection Abstract

    Title: Peace Corps Volunteer Application.
    Need for and Use of This Information: Peace Corps needs this 
information in order to process applicants for Volunteer service. The 
information is used to determine qualifications and potential for 
placement of applicants.
    Respondents: Individuals who apply for Peace Corps service.
    Respondents Obligation To Reply: Required to obtain benefits.
    Burden on the Public:
    a. Annual reporting burden: 90,000 hrs.
    b. Annual record keeping burden: 0 hrs.
    c. Estimated average burden per response: 3 hrs.
    d. Frequency of response: One time.
    e. Estimated number of likely respondents: 30,000.
    f. Estimated cost to respondents: $36.51.
    This notice is issued in Washington, DC on May 28, 1996.
Bessy Kong,
Acting Associate Director for Management.
[FR Doc. 96-13657 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6051-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 413-414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-153]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32842]


Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk and Western Railway 
Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--Burlington Northern Railroad 
Company

    Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN) has agreed to grant 
overhead trackage rights to Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) and 
Norfolk Western Railway Company (NW), collectively referred to as NS, 
over a 112-mile line of railroad between milepost 10.2, at 
Jacksonville, IL, and milepost 122.3, at Centralia, IL. NW is a class I 
railroad controlled through stock ownership by NSR. NSR and its rail 
carrier subsidiaries operate a rail system extending throughout the 
Southeast and Midwest.
    NS contends that the trackage rights will enable it to have more 
efficient routing of its trains. Currently, NS receives coal trains in 
interchange from The Union Pacific Railroad Company at E. St. Louis, 
IL. These trains then move over NS trackage from E. St. Louis for 
delivery at Coffeen, IL. The BN trackage rights will allow NS to 
receive coal trains in interchange at Worden, IL, and move to Coffeen 
via NS to Litchfield, then over BN's trackage rights between 
Litchfield/Winston and Sorento and NS Sorento to Coffeen. NS also 
claims that the trackage rights will enable it to rationalize the E. 
St. Louis-Sorento portion of its E. St. Louis-Coffeen line. The 
trackage rights will become effective on June 1, 1996.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice 
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab 
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may 
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not 
automatically stay the transaction. Pleadings must be filed with the 

[[Page 414]]
Commission <SUP>1 and served on: Robert J. Cooney, Norfolk Southern 
Corporation, 3 Commercial Place, Norfolk, VA 23510-2191.

    \1\ Legislation to sunset the Commission on December 31, 1995, 
and transfer remaining functions is currently under consideration. 
Until further notice, parties submitting pleadings should continue 
to use the current name and address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a condition to the use of this exemption, any employees 
adversely affected by the trackage rights will be protected under 
Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 
(1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 
360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).

    Dated: December 29, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-153 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14698]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention


Meeting of the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention

June 3, 1996.
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A meeting of the Coordinating Council on 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention will take place in the 
District of Columbia, beginning at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, June 28, 1996, 
and ending at 1:00 p.m. on June 28, 1996. This advisory committee, 
chartered as the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention, will meet at the United States Department of 
Justice, located at 10th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Conference Room 
5111, Washington, D.C. 20530. The Coordinating Council, established 
pursuant to section 3(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), will meet to carry out its advisory functions under 
section 206 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 
1974, as amended. This meeting will be open to the public. The public 
is advised that it must enter the building via the Constitution Avenue 
Visitors Center. For security reasons, members of the public who are 
attending the meeting must contact the Office of Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) by close of business June 20, 1996. The 
point of contact at OJJDP is Lutricia Key who can be reached at (202) 
307-5911. The public is further advised that a pictured identification 
is required to enter the building.
Shay Bilchik,
Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
[FR Doc. 96-14698 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Elgood, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Blanca Corp;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  March 6, 2007



Blanca Corp.



By:

/s/Scott Elgood



Scott Elgood, President

(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28911-28912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14176]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC 
20549

Extension:
    Rule 17a-4--SEC File No. 270-198--OMB Control No. 3235-0279
    Rule 24--SEC File No. 270-129--OMB Control No. 3235-0126

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget request for approval of extension on the following rules:
    Rule 17a-4 requires exchange members, brokers and dealers to 
preserve for prescribed periods of time certain records required to be 
made under Rule 17a-3. It is anticipated that approximately 8,300 
broker-dealers are required to comply with Rule 17a-4 and each will 
spend 250.25 hours per year complying with the rule. The total annual 
burden is estimated to be 2,077,075 hours.

[[Page 28912]]

    Rule 24 requires the filing with the Commission of certain 
information indicating that an authorized transaction has been carried 
out in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Commission order 
relating thereto. The rule imposes a burden of about 358 hours annually 
on approximately 253 respondents.
    General comments regarding the estimated burden hours should be 
directed to the Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission 
at the address below. Any comments concerning the accuracy of the 
estimated average burden hours for compliance with Commission rules and 
forms should be directed to Michael E. Bartell, Associate Executive 
Director, Office of Information Technology, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549 and Desk 
Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: May 30, 1996.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14176 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, SOREN DEGN, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  June 1, 2005                             /s/ Soren Degn
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Soren Degn
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORMAN
PETROLEUM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,395,369                 130,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  597,991                 500,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,449,481               3,207,276
<PP&E>                                      78,680,132              49,785,341
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,451,675              12,433,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,729,930              42,376,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,300,767               8,387,746
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,589,588                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,000                   1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (24,174,967)             (5,033,558)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,729,930              42,376,665
<SALES>                                     14,235,272              10,891,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,708,857              11,118,103
<CGS>                                        3,408,208               3,111,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,538,454              12,892,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,723,717               3,982,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,829,597)             (1,774,549)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,829,597)             (1,774,549)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,829,597)             (1,774,549)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (140.52)                 (12.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (140.52)                 (12.42)


</TABLE>
#### Randle De Wayne MURDOCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1611-92.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Feb. 3, 1993.

Discretionary Review Refused Feb. 3, 1993.

Dick DeGuerin, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Alan Curry and Casey O’Brien, Asst. Dist. At-tys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of illegal investment and sentenced to twenty-five years confinement and a fine of $300,-000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed. *Murdock v. State,*840 S.W.2d 558 (Tex.App.—Texarkana, 1992).

During the punishment phase, the trial court admitted evidence concerning extraneous conduct which did not result in final convictions. In *Grunsfeld v. State,*843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Cr.App. No. 1037-91, delivered October 28, 1992), we held that unad-judicated extraneous offenses were inadmissible at the punishment phase of a trial. However, at the time of its decision, the Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of our opinion in *Grunsfeld,*therefore, we will remand this ease in light of that opinion.

*916Accordingly, appellant’s first ground for review is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of *Grunsfeld.*Appellant’s remaining grounds are refused.

BAIRD, J., dissents to the remand believing review should have been granted on appellant’s fourth ground for review.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14898]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318]


Baltimore Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Transfer of 
Authority To Possess and Operate Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, 
Unit Nos. 1 and 2 From Baltimore Gas and Electric Company to 
Constellation Energy Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that the United States Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) is considering approval under Title 10 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.80 of the transfer of 
the licenses to possess and operate Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, 
Unit Nos. 1 and 2 from Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE) to 
Constellation Energy Corporation. By letter dated April 5, 1996, BGE 
requested consent to the transfer, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, of 
Operating License Nos. DPR-53 and DPR-69 for Calvert Cliffs Unit Nos. 1 
and 2. The approval of the proposed license transfers is requested in 
connection with the pending merger between BGE and Potomac Electric 
Power Company into Constellation Energy Corporation. The proposed 
license transfers would transfer authority to possess and operate 
Calvert Cliffs from BGE to Constellation Energy Corporation.
    Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, the Commission may approve the transfer 
of a license, after notice to interested persons, upon the Commission's 
determination that the holder of the license following the transfer is 
qualified to be a holder of the license and the transfer is otherwise 
consistent with applicable provisions of law, regulations and orders of 
the Commission. Additionally, BGE has submitted an application, dated 
April 5, 1996, to amend the licenses to reflect the transfer of the 
licenses from BGE to Constellation Energy Corporation.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the April 5, 
1996, letter, which is available for public inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, 
NW, Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at 
the Calvert County Library, Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of June 1996.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jocelyn A. Mitchell,
Acting Director, Project Directorate I-1, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 96-14898 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P