alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1/32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cytta Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31st, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Spalding,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Stephen Spalding
--------------------------------------------
Name:  Stephen Spalding
Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Date:  May 13th, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,530
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,490
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,104
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                74
<LOANS>                                         13,640
<ALLOWANCE>                                        122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,811
<DEPOSITS>                                      14,629
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 21
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               15
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  16,811
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,174
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  118
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,293
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 725
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              555
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       12
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  12
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     12
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          12
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         7
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.37
<LOANS-NON>                                        144
<LOANS-PAST>                                       144
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     61
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   110
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  122
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               122
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 800 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 15, 2009. 

Whereas, on September 26, 2009, Tropical Storm Ketsana 

made landfall on the Philippines with the heaviest rainfall 

in 40 years equivalent to a typical month of rain during 

monsoon season; 

Whereas 80 percent of the capital, Manila, was submerged 

under water as a result; 

Whereas at least 3,000,000 persons have been affected by 

Tropical Storm Ketsana; 

Whereas more than 135,470 families or 686,000 persons 

have been forced into evacuation centers; 

Whereas the casualties, as of October 9, 2009, include at 

least 237 dead, 308 injured, and 37 missing; 

Whereas more than 4,640 houses were damaged or destroyed; 

Whereas Tropical Storm Ketsana has caused at least 

$4,800,000,000 in damages; 

Whereas following the devastation caused by Tropical Storm 

Ketsana, Typhoon Parma hit land October 2, 2009, 

bringing with it more torrential rain causing further 

flooding, landslides, crop damaged, and killing at least 

193 more people; 
2 

•HRES 800 EH 

Whereas the United States and the Philippines have a unique 

and enduring relationship that is based on shared history 

and commitment to democratic principles, as well as on 

strong economic ties; 

Whereas the historical and cultural links between the Philippines and the United States remain important; and 

Whereas the Filipino American community is the second largest Asian-American group in the United States with a 

population of approximately 3,100,000: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) mourns the terrible loss of life caused by Tropical Storm Ketsana and Typhoon Parma that occurred 

on September 26, 2009, and October 1, 2009; 

(2) expresses its deepest condolences to the families 

of the many victims; 

(3) urges President Obama to continue to support 

the Philippines with emergency relief supplies, logistical, 

transportation assistance, and financial support; and 

(4) works closely with the Government of the Philippines to improve disaster mitigation techniques and 

compliance among all key sectors of their societies. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit
31.2



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Howard Doss, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Trxade Group, Inc. (the “registrant”);                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



|Date:
    July 17, 2020                                              | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                     | 
|/s/
    Howard Doss                                                  | 
|Howard
    Doss                                                      | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 665 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 665

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 22, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2920) to reinstitute and update the Pay-As-
You-Go requirement of budget neutrality on new tax and mandatory spending 
legislation, enforced by the threat of annual, automatic sequestration. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, modified by 
the amendment printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, shall 
be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Budget; (2) the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed 
in part C of the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative 
Ryan of Wisconsin or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention 
of any point of order except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, 
shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  For purposes of the concurrent resolution on the budget, the 
amounts specified in section 421(a)(2)(A) and section 421(a)(2)(C) shall be 
considered to be those reflected in section 314 and section 316, respectively, 
of the House companion measure.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopper's Wallet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob
Perry, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.


                                            /s/ Jacob Perry
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Jacob Perry
                                            Principal Executive Officer
                                            August 13, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

AUG 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FERNANDO BUSTILLO,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

BEACON, Unknown; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-15876

D.C. No. 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT

U.S. District Court for Arizona, 

Tucson

MANDATE

The judgment of this Court, entered June 26, 2018, takes effect this date. 

This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 

41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Rebecca Lopez

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT Document 23 Filed 08/20/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Juan Manuel TORRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 804-88.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

May 3, 1989.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1990.

Larry Warner, Port Isabel, for appellant.

Benjamin Euresti, Jr., Dist. Atty., John A. Olson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Brownsville, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of voluntary manslaughter. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty (20) years in the Texas Department of Corrections. On appeal the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. *Torres v. State,*751 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi, 1988).

The appellant raises five grounds for re'view, upon which we granted his petition. Upon further consideration, however, we believe our decision to do so was improvident, and we agree with the Court of Appeals that affirmance is warranted.

As is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, however, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the language or reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. *Sheffield v. State,*650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). This is especially true in this case where the Court of Appeals relied (somewhat justifiably) on our then recent case of *Gold v. State,*736 S.W.2d 685 (Tex.Cr.App.1987), in saying “as long as we find more than a ‘mere modicum’ of evidence to support it, we must conclude the jury was justified in finding the absence of the defense beyond a reasonable doubt.” *Torres,*supra at 707.

Recently, in *Butler v. State,*769 S.W.2d 234 (Tex.Cr.App.1989), we explicitly rejected the “any evidence” or "mere modicum” test for sufficiency of the evidence and expressly overruled *Combs v. State,*643 S.W.2d 709 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) to the extent of conflict. We agree with Judge Teague’s dissenting opinion in *Gold,*supra, wherein he quoted the Supreme Court in *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 312-313, 320, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2785-2786, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560:

> That the Thompson “no evidence” rule is simply inadequate to protect against misapplications of the constitutional standard of reasonable doubt is readily apparent. “[A] *mere modicum of evidence may satisfy a ‘no evidence’ standard*” [citations omitted]. Any evidence that is relevant — that has any tendency to make the existence of an element of a crime more probable than it would be without the evidence, cf. Fed.Rule Evid. 401 — could be deemed a “mere modicum.” *But it could not seriously be argued that such a modicum of evidence could by itself rationally support*
>       *825
>       *a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.*

*Gold,*supra, 692-693 [emphasis supplied]. We therefore take this opportunity to disavow language in *Gold,*supra, that states:

> So long as we find more than a “mere modicum” of evidence to support it, we must conclude the jury was justified in finding the absence of sudden passion beyond a reasonable doubt. *Gold,*supra, 690.

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

McCORMICK, P.J., and W.C. DAVIS and WHITE, JJ., concur in result.
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant, v. Steven H. KEENEY, Respondent.

No. 93-SC-825-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Feb. 24, 1994.

*793ORDER

Steven H. Keeney accepted a retainer fee from an out-of-state lawyer to assist in collecting an attorney’s fee from an estate in Kentucky. Because Keeney ceased communicating with the client, the matter was turned over to the Kentucky Bar Association for further action.

After the filing of the complaint, the respondent failed to respond to inquiries from the KBA. As a result, charges were made against the respondent. Count I charged a failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Count II charged a failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.

After investigation, the KBA found that the respondent did accept the retainer fee and did not perform any legal services for his client, although, during the course of the investigation, the respondent did return the retainer fee. The Board of Governors found that there was sufficient evidence to support a verdict of guilt on both counts. The Board also entered into the record the fact that Keeney had been previously suspended from the practice of law on July 1, 1993, for fifty-nine days for failure to return unearned fees advanced to him by another client and for failure to exercise diligence and promptness in the representation of that client. A sixty-day suspension was recommended.

The respondent, Steven H. Keeney, is hereby found guilty of one count of failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information, and one count of failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. As a result, the respondent is suspended from the practice of law for sixty days from the date of this Order.

ENTERED: February 24, 1994.

/s/Robert F. Stephens

ROBERT F. STEPHENS, Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I,  Thomas W.  Martin,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager
of the Registrant,  in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Leasing Fund
Eleven, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Quarterly  Report") certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     LLC.


Dated: November 17, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Martin
Thomas W. Martin
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ICON Capital Corp.
Manager of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Spark
Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gregory R. Liberman
|Gregory R. Liberman    
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 12, 2011           
|                       
|/s/ Brett A. Zane      
|Brett A. Zane          
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 12, 2011
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

April 12, 2024

CR-2023-0648

Cornelius Marchett Gray v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit 

Court: CC-04-2639.61) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on April 12, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
Exhibit
      24.2


CERTIFIED
        RESOLUTIONS
 
 Certified
        to be a true and correct copy of the resolutions adopted by the Board of
        Directors of PMA Capital Corporation at a meeting held on February 21, 2006,
        a
        quorum being present, and such resolutions are still in full force and effect
        as
        of this date of certification, not having been amended, modified or rescinded
        since the date of their adoption.
 
 RESOLVED,
        that the Officers of the Company, and each of them, are hereby authorized
        to
        sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
        31,
        2005, and any amendments thereto, (the "Form 10-K") in the name and on behalf
        of
        the Company and as attorneys for each of its Directors and
        Officers.
 
 RESOLVED,
        that each Officer and Director of the Company who may be required to execute
        (whether on behalf of the Company or as an Officer or Director thereof) the
        Form
        10-K, is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a power of attorney appointing
        such person or persons named therein as true and lawful attorneys and agents
        to
        execute in the name, place and stead (in any such capacity) of any such Officer
        or Director the Form 10-K and to file any such power of attorney together
        with
        the Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
        Company, this 13th day of March, 2006.
 
 
 /s/
                  Joseph W. La BargeJoseph
                  W. La BargeAssistant
                  SecretaryPMA Capital
                Corporation
  
 
 (SEAL)