alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 789 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 789

 Expressing support for designation of October 2, 2009, as World MRSA 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2009

Mrs. Biggert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of October 2, 2009, as World MRSA 
                                  Day.

Whereas MRSA is an acronym for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, 
        which causes deadly infections in patients in healthcare facilities and 
        within our communities;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have estimated that 
        hospital-acquired MRSA infections alone killed more than 19,000 United 
        States residents in 2006;
Whereas patient and consumer organizations around the globe are lending their 
        voices to the call of world unity in leadership and commitment in 
        preventing and stopping MRSA, which is pandemic and spreading at 
        alarming rates;
Whereas leading patient and consumer advocates call upon healthcare officials 
        and leaders to step up and take a more comprehensive approach to 
        eradicate this preventable disease and focus on a broad and pro-active 
        prevention program; and
Whereas as an integral part of its multi-faceted program, the MRSA Survivors 
        Network, the first consumer organization in the United States to raise 
        the alarm concerning the MRSA epidemic and other multi-drug resistant 
        healthcare-acquired infections, has announced ``World MRSA Day'', which 
        will be held on October 2, 2009, and commemorated each year after on 
        this date; in addition, the month of October will also be designated 
        ``World MRSA Awareness Month'' in order to call attention to this 
        worldwide epidemic: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of World MRSA Day.
                                 <all>
```
SPECIMEN OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE


                                  JUNE 13, 1996

         NUMBER                                                           SHARES




                ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

                              iGoHEALTHY.com, Inc.

          AUTHORIZED 50,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK o $0.001 PAR VALUE


This Certifies that___________________ is the registered holder of _____________
Shares transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness  Whereof,  the said  Corporation  has caused this  Certificate  to be
signed by its duly  authorized  officers and its Corporate  Seal to be hereunder
affixed

this  ______  day of  ________________________________  A.D._____________


/s/ Farid E. Tannous                [SEAL]           /s/ Bill Glaser
----------------------                              ----------------------------
     President                                            Secretary


                                       69
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Richard N. Jeffs                                               |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Richard      N. JeffsChief      Financial OfficerRock City Energy Corp. |   |   |   |   |
#### Cynthia Jean SUGLIO, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65367.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 12, 1994.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Reginald P. Bodeux, Niedner, Ahleim, Bo-deux and Dorsey, St. Charles, for respondent.

REINHARD, Judge.

The Director of Revenue (Director) appeals the trial court’s reversal of her revocation of petitioner’s driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical test. We reverse and remand.

Petitioner was arrested on November 16, 1992. The Director revoked petitioner’s driver’s license, pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo Supp.1993, for refusal to submit to a chemical test.

The Director mailed a notice of revocation to petitioner on December 8,1992. On April 13,1993, petitioner filed a petition for review in the trial court. On May 19, 1993, the Director filed a motion to dismiss, contending the court below lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to petitioner’s failure to timely *754file for review. The court denied the motion, finding that Director sent a faulty notice which was “confusing and, therefore, improper”. On November 8, 1993, the cause was confessed by an assistant prosecuting attorney. On November 23, 1993, the court entered an order reinstating petitioner’s driving privileges.

Petitions for review must be filed within thirty days of mailing of the notice of revocation. § 536.110, RSMo 1986; *Ramey v. Director of Revenue,*865 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Mo.App.E.D.1993). Failure to do so deprives the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction. *Ramey,*865 S.W.2d at 443. Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived or agreed to. *Pool v. Director of Revenue,*824 S.W.2d 515, 517 (Mo.App.1992). A confession of judgment does not vest a court with subject matter jurisdiction which is otherwise lacking. *Evans v. Director of Revenue,*871 S.W.2d 90, 92 (Mo.App.E.D.1994). When a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, it can take no action other than to exercise its inherent power to dismiss. *Pool v. Director of Revenue,*824 S.W.2d 515, 517 (Mo.App.*1992).*

Petitioner argued at trial1 that the notice indicated the revocation was to commence thirty-one days after mailing, rather than thirty. Given that the petition was filed three months late, rather than one day, petitioner was not prejudiced by this error. Petitioner also noted the appeal language on the notice was crossed out. The Director’s failure to advise petitioner regarding how to appeal a “refusal” revocation does not affect whether the court is vested with jurisdiction over an untimely petition. *Keegan v. Director of Revenue,*769 S.W.2d 197, 198 (Mo.App.1989).

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.

GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and CRAHAN, J., concur.

1

. We note that petitioner did not file a brief on appeal.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 20, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

126997 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RALPH KROCHMAL, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 126997 

 COA: 242776 

Wayne CC: 00-004378-CK

PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On December 14, 2005, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave 

to appeal the May 20, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the 

application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we 

VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals because we do not agree that Perez v 

Aetna Life Insurance Company, 150 F3d 550 (CA 6, 1998), to the extent that the Court of 

Appeals relied on that decision, states the relevant Michigan common law legal standard, 

and we AFFIRM the Wayne Circuit Court's judgment of an award of disability benefits. 

CAVANAGH, J., concurs and states as follows: 

I concur with the order vacating the judgment of the Court of Appeals because it 

will also disavow the proposition that the phrase “satisfactory written proof of loss” is all 

that is needed to vest an insurer with complete discretionary authority. 

KELLY, J., concurs and states as follows: 

I concur with Justice Cavanagh's statement. I agree with the vacation of the 

judgment of the Court of Appeals for the additional reason that, in vacating, we make 

clear that the determination of an insurance company is reviewed by a court using a 

de novo standard. 

t0117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 20, 2006 

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3D (No. 333-96869) of Corporate Property Associates 14
Incorporated of our report dated March 20, 2003 relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which
is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 20, 2003 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 2003
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of 51146,
Inc. for the quarter ending April 30, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51146, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April
          30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending April 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          51146, Inc.

Dated:  June 14, 2005

51146, INC.

By: /s/ Scott Raleigh
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51146, Inc., for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51146, Inc. hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.      SuchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended July 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of 51146, Inc. 

 
| Dated: September 12, 2005 |
|---------------------------|

 

**51146, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/  Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Bruce M. Jaffe, the chief financial officer of LogicVision, Inc. (the“Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

 

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

ANNA R. WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

United States Courthouse

405 W. Congress Street, Suite 4800

Tucson, Arizona 85701

Telephone: 520-620-7300

Email: anna.wright@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren,

Defendant.

18-mj-01455-N/A-BPV

MOTION FOR STATUS 

CONFERENCE

The United States of America, by and through its attorneys undersigned, 

respectfully requests that the Court set a status conference in this matter two days prior to 

the Video Deposition currently scheduled for Friday, February 9, 2018, for the following 

reasons. 

The plea offer extended in this case requires that a change of plea hearing be 

conducted two days before the Video Deposition. As such, the government requests a 

status conference two days prior to the Video Deposition in order to: (1) confirm that the 

Video Deposition will proceed on the currently scheduled date and that the defense will 

not be seeking a continuance of the Video Deposition, (2) resolve any outstanding 

discovery disputes and/or potential evidentiary issues that could arise at the Video 

Deposition, and (3) make a record that the defendant has been advised of the [pre-

//

Case 4:18-mj-01455-N/A-BPV Document 13 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

indictment] plea offer in this case and has rejected that plea offer; or, alternatively, conduct 

a change a plea hearing if the defendant decides to accept the government’s plea offer. 

Respectfully submitted this 23rd day of January, 2018.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona

s/Anna R. Wright

ANNA R. WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or 

by other means this 23rd day of January, 2018, to:

William G. Walker, Esq.

Michael Areinoff, Esq.

Case 4:18-mj-01455-N/A-BPV Document 13 Filed 01/23/18 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                             TRIPATH IMAGING, INC.


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         Each of the undersigned officers of TriPath Imaging, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   March 24, 2003                      /s/ Paul R. Sohmer, M.D.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Paul R. Sohmer, M.D.
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Dated:   March 24, 2003                      /s/ Stephen P. Hall
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Stephen P. Hall
                                             Chief Financial Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 26, 2013   /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 636 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives 

all information in the Attorney General’s possession relating to the transfer or release of detainees held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, into the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2009 

Mr. WOLF submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House 

of Representatives all information in the Attorney General’s possession relating to the transfer or release of 

detainees held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

into the United States. 

1 Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to 

2 transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 

3 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, 

4 copies of any document, memo, or correspondance of the 

5 Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of 

6 Investigations and United States Marshal Service, or any 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 636 IH 

1 portion of any such document, memo, or correspondance, 

2 that refers or relates to— 

3 (1) any guidance, recommendations, or 

4 logistical preparations made since January 20, 2009, 

5 for the transfer or release of the detainees held at 

6 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the 

7 United States; 

8 (2) the identities of any detainees that have 

9 been cleared for release into the United States and 

10 as any information about the capture, detention, and 

11 threat assessment of such detainees; 

12 (3) the countries that have been contacted by 

13 Government officials to request their acceptance of 

14 detainees currently held at Naval Station, Guanta15 namo Bay, Cuba; and 

16 (4) the legal guidance regarding the transfer, 

17 detention or release of detainees held at Naval Sta18 tion, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the United 

19 States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Floyd CROSS, Appellant.

No. WD 47322.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 7, 1993.

Raymond L. Legg, Office of the State Public Defender Office, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986, and from sentence of imprisonment for six years as a prior and persistent offender.

Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Douglas Haig, 

Defendant. 

No. 18-00105MJ 

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Continue Status 

Hearing (Doc. 9), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED the status hearing presently set for February 15, 2018 is reset to 

March 15, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns, Sandra Day 

O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003, 

Courtroom 303. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)______ will commence on _______for a total of ______days. 

 Dated this 13th day of February, 2018.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Tara Whitten, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Andrew Michael Blake, 

Defendant. 

No. MC-18-00017-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 At issue is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) (“R&R”) by United States 

Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns recommending that the Court dismiss this matter for 

lack of prosecution. The R&R issued on January 14, 2019. It advised the parties that they 

had fourteen days to file written objections, and if none were filed, the Court may accept 

the R&R and act in accordance without further review. Time to object has long passed 

without objection from any party. Because the recommendation is based on the parties’ 

failure to engage, appear for hearings or prosecute this matter, including Plaintiff/Creditor 

who instituted the matter, the Court concludes on independent review that dismissal is 

appropriate. 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting the R&R (Doc. 15) in this matter and dismissing the 

matter. The Clerk of Court shall close this matter. 

 Dated this 6th day of March, 2019. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi 

United States District Judge