alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15076]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review; Notice

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for revision to a currently approved collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and OMB Control Number: Epidemiologic Studies of Morbidity 
Among Gulf War Veterans: A Search for Etiologic Agents and Risk 
Factors; OMB Control Number 0720-0010.
    Type of Request: Revision; Emergency processing requested with a 
shortened public comment period ending June 21, 1996. An approval date 
of June 28, 1996 is requested.
    Number of Respondents: 8,900.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 8,900.
    Average Burden per Response: 12 Minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 2,070.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is necessary to 
conduct Congressionally directed studies of the health consequences of 
military service in Southwest Asia during the Persian Gulf War. 
Information collected hereby will be used to improve the 
identification, resolution, or prevention of reproductive health 
illnesses, and the formulation of policy. Respondents are current and 
former members of all services of the U.S. Military, including 
reservists and members of the National Guard, as well as female 
veterans who were pregnant during the Persian Gulf War.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Allison Eydt.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Eydt at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10235, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: June 10, 1996.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-15076 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-P
EXHIBIT 32.1








NET TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010of NetTalk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anastasios Kyriakides, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Anastasios KyriakidesAnastasios KyriakidesChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: February 14, 2011






33
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Meg A. Gentle, Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                            
|/s/    Meg A. Gentle                                                                                                        
|Meg A. Gentle Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

Date: May 7, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30239-30240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15108]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the

[[Page 30240]]

Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

International Trading Partners, Inc., 11 East 44 Street, Suite 508, 
New York, NY 10017, Officers: Philip J. Wahl, President, Mary J. 
Cesare, Exec. Vice President
Transportation Logistics, Inc., 7525 Connelley Drive, Suite R, 
Hanover, MD 21076, Officer: Gregory John McCloskey, President
King Senderax, Incorporated d/b/a, King Senderax Cargo, 1530 North 
Gower Street, Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA 90028, Officers: Anupam 
Biswas, President, Norbert Giessmann, Vice President, Mahua Biswas, 
Treasurer
Gulf Eagle USA, Inc., 521 Kent Road, Glen Burnie, MD 21060, Officer: 
Mark Bruins, Director
International Logistics Corporation, 1701 Quincy Avenue, Suite 5, 
Naperville, IL 60540, Officers: John D. Staton, Chairman, Mark C. 
Goss, Exec. Vice President
Turtle Express Line, Inc., 6115 Polo Drive, Cumming, GA 30130, 
Officer: Heeok Chung, President
Arriaga & Associates, Inc., 9011 Sheldon Road, Houston, TX 77049, 
Officers: Pandora Daugherty, President, Darryl William Cullick, Vice 
President

    Dated: June 7, 1996.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15108 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00480-CV

Ford Motor Company

v.

Maria Cruz Lopez, Individually and as Representative of David Torres Cruz, and 

Incapacitated Adult

On Appeal from the

357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-DCL-02325-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 31, 2021
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Oak Tree Educational Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph J. Bianco, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oak Tree Educational
Partners, Inc. and will be retained by Oak Tree Educational Partners, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





/s/  Joseph J.
    BiancoJoseph
      J. BiancoChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





November
12, 2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4482 NICK LEE LOSEY, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-98-33) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Thomas G. Dyer, DYER LAW OFFICES, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. David E. Godwin, United States Attorney, Sam G. Nazzaro, Assistant United States Attorney, Sharon L. Potter, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Nick Lee Losey appeals the 240-month sentence he r eceived after he pled guilty to interstate domestic violence, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 2261(a)(1) (West Supp. 1999), and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1994). He contends that the district court clearly erred in determining the amount of cocaine for which he was responsible. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 (1998); United States v. McDonald , 61 F.3d 248, 255 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard of review). We affirm.Following his arrest, Losey gave a statement to a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent in which he admitted that, for two years, he bought two ounces of cocaine and a pound of marijuana per week from his source. When Losey entered into a plea agreement, the government agreed to stipulate that Losey was responsible for 500 grams to two kilograms of cocaine. However, the probation officer relied on Losey's statement in calculating that he was responsible for 5.3 kilograms of cocaine. At the sentencing hearing, the DEA agent testified that he regarded the stipulation as an accurate estimate of the amount of cocaine Losey distributed. Nonetheless, the district courtdecided that Losey's own statement was the best evidence, particularly in view of the fact that, to the degree it could be corroborated, it appeared to be accurate. We are not able to say that the district court clearly erred in making this determination. We therefore affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Exhibit 10.14

Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officers

as of April 15, 2008.

On March 10, 2008, the Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors of JMP Group Inc. (the
Company) completed its annual performance and compensation review of the Companys named executive officers and approved the 2008 base salaries of the Companys named executive officers. The Committee also approved the
performance objectives for the named executive officers under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan, as more fully described below.

Base Salaries

The 2008 annual base salaries for the Companys named executive officers, effective on April 15, 2008, are as follows:



|                                                                                  |  |              |        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | -------
|Name and Position                                                                 |  | Base Salary1
|Joseph A. Jolson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                            |  | $            | 200,000
|Thomas B. Kilian, Chief Financial Officer                                         |  | $            | 200,000
|Craig R. Johnson, President                                                       |  | $            | 200,000
|Mark L. Lehmann, Director of Equities and Co-President of JMP Securities          |  | $            | 200,000
|Carter D. Mack, Director of Investment Banking and Co-President of JMP Securities |  | $            | 200,000

2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan

The Committee established performance objectives for 2008 with respect to the payment of cash bonuses to each of the named executive officers under the
2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan. Under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan, each of the named executive officers may, subject to the Compensation Committees authority to reduce any such bonus in its sole and absolute discretion, receive a
cash bonus payment upon either or both of the following: (i) the achievement by the Company of a certain performance target with respect to operating income for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, and (ii) with respect to each
named executive officer, the production of revenues attributable to his area of business responsibility or production. Any cash bonus payments with respect to 2008 under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan will be paid in one lump sum payment
shortly after the end of the 2008 fiscal year.

This document is intended to be a summary of existing oral, at will arrangements, and in no
way is intended to provide any additional rights to any of the named executive officers.





|1 | Base salaries until April 15, 2008 were $125,000 per annum for each of the named executive officers.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable William Stafford, United States District Judge for the Northern District *

of Florida, sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0116n.06

Filed: February 12, 2007

Case No. 03-1700

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JUNE CARABELL, et al.

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF

ENGINEERS, et al.

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER REMANDING CASE

TO THE DISTRICT COURT

WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO

REMAND TO THE ARMY

CORPS OF ENGINEERS

BEFORE: BATCHELDER and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; STAFFORD , District Judge. *

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in the consolidated cases of Rapanos v. United

States, No. 04-1034, and Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. 04-1384, 126 S.

Ct. 2208 (2006), we REMAND this case to the district court with instructions to remand to the Army

Corps of Engineers for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in

Rapanos.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-2101WA

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Dewaine Summerhill, *

*

Appellant. *

_____________ Appeals from the United States

District Court for the Western

No. 97-2102WA District of Arkansas.

_____________

 [UNPUBLISHED]

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Robert Patrick Hickey, *

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: December 9, 1997

Filed: December 17, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
-2-

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Dewaine Summerhill and Robert Patrick Hickey appeal their fraud-related

convictions. Summerhill and Hickey contend the district court improperly denied their

motions for a continuance to prepare for trial. Additionally, Summerhill raises

contentions related to the district court's refusal to grant Summerhill's motion for a

separate trial and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdicts. A

review of the record shows the parties' claims are without merit. Because the appeal

involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, a discussion will

serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm the convictions of Summerhill and Hickey

without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| (1)   | Such Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Cheyenne Resources Corporation. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | December 1, 2009                                                                                                                         |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:               | /s/ Thomas J. Cunningham                                                                                                                 |
|              | Thomas J. Cunningham, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of White
Dental Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nancy White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Michael White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/Nancy White

Nancy
White

Chief Executive Officer

August
20, 2007





/s/ Michael White

Michael
White

Chief Financial Officer

August
20, 2007
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

d0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137703

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137703 COA: 287355 Oakland CC: 2008-218684-FH PAUL GREGORY WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 1, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. J.C. HILL, Appellant. J.C. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 56143, 59971.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 23, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 28, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied' Nov. 22, 1994.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his *Batson*challenge to the prosecutor’s peremptory strikes after this court remanded to the trial court to determine whether said strikes were racially motivated, 854 S.W.2d 486. We affirm. The trial court’s denial of Defendant’s *Batson*motion is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The denial of Defendant’s *Batson*motion is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for *739our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.