alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                          INTERIM CAPITAL CORPORATION.
                 FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Lindberg, certify that

     1.   I am the Chief Executive Officer of Interim Capital Corporation.
     2.   Attached  to this  certification  is Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended
          March 31, 2006, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the
          issuer with the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  pursuant to Section
          13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act of 1934  (the
          "Exchange Act"), which contains financial statements.
     3.   I hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
          o    The periodic  report  containing the financial  statements  fully
               complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Exchange Act, and
          o    The  information in the periodic report fairly  presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the issuer for the periods presented.


May 11, 2006                                              /s/ Mark Lindberg
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Mark Lindberg
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by Interim Capital  Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This  certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document  with which it is submitted to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
ex1055.htm


    
      

      

    


    December
4, 2008

     

    Mr.
Philip J. Purcell

    227 West
Monroe Street

    Suite
5045

    Chicago,
IL 60606

    


     

    Dear
Phil:

     

    This will
confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2009.

     

    1.           All
director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your
service on the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR
Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009, will be deferred and paid to you in accordance with this
letter agreement.

     

    2.           Fees
will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Procedures
for Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and restated, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).

     

    3.           On
the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the Stock
Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash and paid
to you in a lump sum by multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by
the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market value”)
during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation and any
affiliates, and cease rendering services.  Payment cannot be
accelerated.

     

    4.           In
the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of
death will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the
calendar month immediately preceding your death, and the amount paid to Anne
Purcell.  The payment contemplated by this paragraph 4 will be made on
the 30th
business day following the date of your death.

     

    If the
foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the
originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.

     

    


     

    


    Very
truly yours,

     

    /s/
Kenneth W. Wimberly

     

    Kenneth W. Wimberly

    Corporate
Secretary

    


    


    


    


    Accepted
and agreed:

    


    


    /s/
Philip J. Purcell       

    Philip J.
Purcell
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1142

RICHARD MAINA KIHARA,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: July 18, 2017 Decided: September 6, 2017

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting 

Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Madeline Henley, 

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Maina Kihara, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We 

have reviewed the administrative record and Kihara’s claims, and conclude that the 

Board did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) 

(2017); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we deny 

the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Kihara (B.I.A. 

Jan. 4, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Jose Raul Aguilar,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00014-PHX-GMS

DETENTION ORDER

On January 29, 2021, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released 

on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 29th day of January, 2021.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00014-GMS Document 42 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit 32.2

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016 (the Report) of
PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat                
|Name: Aviv Efrat              
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
|Date: August 8, 2016
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Scott Allen,

Petitioner, 

vs.

R. Rhodes, Acting Warden, et al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 18-132-TUC-CKJ (JR) 

ORDER

On September 9, 2020, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 16) in which she recommends the Court dismiss with prejudice the

Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 6). The Report and Recommendation

advised the parties that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2), any

party may serve and file written objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with

a copy of the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed within the time

provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After an independent review, the Court finds it is

appropriate to adopt the Report and Recommendation and dismiss the Amended Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED.

2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this

Case 4:18-cv-00132-CKJ Document 17 Filed 11/12/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

matter. 

4. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event

Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because

reasonable could not “debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have

been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were ‘adequate to deserve

encouragement to proceed further’.” See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see

also Close v. Thomas, 653 F.3d 970, 974 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2011) (“COA is not required to appeal

the denial of a § 2241 petition filed by a person in federal custody”).

DATED this 10th day of November, 2020.

Case 4:18-cv-00132-CKJ Document 17 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT Document 8 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT Document 8 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT Document 8 Filed 03/23/18 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT Document 8 Filed 03/23/18 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT Document 8 Filed 03/23/18 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:18-cv-00039-CKJ-PSOT Document 8 Filed 03/23/18 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Radio One, Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 15, 2005



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Alfred C. Liggins, III           
|Name:  |  | Alfred C. Liggins, III               
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radio One, Inc. and will be retained by Radio One, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3223

_____________________________

KIMBERLY CANNON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

May 17, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Kimberly Cannon, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit
10.4


ADDENDUM





Made this
14th
day of January, 2010





To
Agreement dated December 15, 2009 between Infrastructure Materials Corp.,
Canadian Infrastructure Corp., and Todd Montgomery (the Agreement).





Whereas the parties
anticipated that all conditions would be met and the closing finalized on or
before January 1, 2010; and





Whereas the parties to the
Agreement agree to extend the date to allow further time.





Now therefore the parties to
the Agreement agree as follows:





The date
of Closing and completion of the escrow conditions, where referred to in the
Agreement, shall be extended to take place on or before February 15, 2010, or
such other date as the parties may agree.





All other
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same and time shall
remain of the essence.





This
Addendum may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.  Execution and delivery of this Addendum by exchange of
facsimile copies bearing facsimile signature of a party shall constitute a valid
and binding execution and delivery of this Agreement by such
party.  Such facsimile copies shall constitute enforceable original
documents.





In
Witness whereas the parties have executed this Addendum as of the first date
written above.





Infrastructure
      Materials Corp.By:
              /s/ Mason DouglasMason
      DouglasCanadian
      Infrastructure Corp.By:
              /s/ Todd MontgomeryTodd
      Montgomery/s/ Todd MontgomeryTodd
      Montgomery
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7638

ROBERT ALEX ZANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HARLEY LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; GERALDO MALDONADO, JR.; RONALD W. 

RIKER; TRACY W. JOHNS; JOSEPH P. YOUNG; KENNETH MOTTERN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:08-ct-03117-FL)

Submitted: January 31, 2013 Decided: February 7, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Alex Zander, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, 

FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Seth Morgan 

Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert A. Zander appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing without prejudice for failure to exhaust 

administrative remedies his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens 

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 

U.S. 388 (1971).* We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Zander v. Lappin, No. 5:08-ct-03117-FL 

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We vacated the district court’s prior order dismissing 

Zander’s complaint for failure to exhaust administrative 

remedies and remanded to the district court for further 

findings. See Zander v. Lappin, No. 10-6484, 415 F. App’x 491 

(4th Cir. 2011).
Exhibit 32





COPSYNC, INC.





CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS


(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Matinee Media Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.






May 17, 2010/s/ RUSSELL D. CHANEYRussell D. Chaney,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer










The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
H. Res. 770 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 24, 2009. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he 

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT: 

Mr. McCaul. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**CERTIFICATION      OF LARRY POWALISZ**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Larry                Powalisz                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Larry                Powalisz                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                         |

----
CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL

Pursuant to the Order of the Court, undersigned counsel personally certifies that 

she has consulted with counsel for Tabarka on April 25, 2018. At that time, Merola’s 

positions were presented regarding Tabarka’s authorship and ownership issues, and 

regarding issues related to the Lanham Act and state-law claims in Tabarka’s original 

counterclaim. As a result of the conference, counsel for Tabarka agreed to amend its 

counterclaim to dismiss the Lanham Act and state-law claims. 

Despite Tabarka’s additional amendments to its Counterclaim, the dispositive 

deficiencies with respect to the Paris Metro 1, Paris Metro 11, and Casablanca 2 works 

have not been cured. Counsel further asserts that she does not believe, given historical 

fact, that any further amendment can cure the deficiencies framed in Merola’s Motion to 

Dismiss.

Respectfully submitted this 15th day of May, 2018. 

/s/ Erin D. Knese 

Erin D. Knese

Attorney for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

Merola Sales Company, Inc.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick Fagen, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Del Toro Silver
      Corp. for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Del Toro Silver Corp.                                                                

Dated: September 19, 2011



| | /s/
      Patrick Fagen                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Patrick Fagen                                                       
| | Chief Financial Officer and Director                                
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Del Toro Silver Corp.                                               



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Del Toro Silver
Corp. and will be retained by Del Toro Silver Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 19, 2011   /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.