alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 76 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 28, 2009. 

Whereas, on January 4, 2009, millions of tons of earth fell 

onto a road in the Alta Verapaz area north of Guatemala 

City, Guatemala; 

Whereas it is suspected that a geological fault triggered the 

movement of earth, sending 10,000,000 tons of mud and 

rock down a hillside onto a road that runs from San 

Cristobal Verapaz to Chicaman, north of Guatemala City; 

Whereas at least 36 people were confirmed dead and up to 

60 were missing, many of whom are coffee workers in the 

region; 

Whereas rescue organizations, volunteers, and agencies from 

throughout Guatemala had been working at the site until 

danger of another landslide shut down the operation; 

Whereas, on January 8, 2009, at 1:21PM, a 6.1 magnitude 

earthquake shook the Capital region of San Jose, Costa 

Rica, including the areas of Sarapiqui, Varablanca, and 

Poasito; 

Whereas the earthquake’s epicenter was 20 miles from San 

Jose at a depth of 21.7 miles and the shaking continued 

for 40 seconds; 
2 

•HRES 76 EH 

Whereas 23 individuals were confirmed dead, over 100 were 

treated for injuries, and nearly a dozen went missing, including many buried by the resulting landslides; 

Whereas 518 homes were destroyed to the point where they 

were uninhabitable, 26 kilometers of road were unusable, 

and 61 communities were affected; 

Whereas roads, businesses, government buildings, and the 

popular tourist sites at the Poas Volcano and the La Paz 

waterfalls were severely damaged; and 

Whereas Guatemala and Costa Rica have been frequently impacted by significant natural disasters, including those in 

the aftermath of Hurricane Stan in Guatemala in 2005 

that led to hundreds of deaths: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That— 

(1) the House of Representatives— 

(A) mourns the terrible loss of life caused by 

the landslide that occurred on January 4, 2009, in 

Guatemala and the earthquake on January 8, 2009, 

in Costa Rica; 

(B) expresses its deepest condolences to the 

families of the many victims; and 

(C) applauds the prompt humanitarian responses to these natural disasters by the Governments of Guatemala and Costa Rica; and 

(2) it is the sense of the House of Representatives 

that it should be the policy of the United States to— 

(A) continue technical assistance to Central 

American governments in order to strengthen their 
3 

•HRES 76 EH 

capacity at the national, provincial, and local levels 

in the area of disaster management coordination 

and preparedness, including implementing information and communications systems to help with the 

response to natural disasters; and 

(B) work closely with the governments of these 

countries to improve disaster mitigation techniques 

and compliance among all key sectors of their societies. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William Uusiheimala
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                August
      5,  2009
exhibit101.htm


     

      
        

      

    

     

    
      Exhibit
10.1

      
 

      MDU
Resources Group, Inc.

      2009
NEO Annual Award Opportunity Chart

       

      
        
          
            
              
                	
                        Name

                      	
                        Title

                      	
                        1/1/2009

                        Base

                        Compensation ($)

                      	
                        Threshold ($)

                      	
                        Target ($)

                      	
                        Maximum ($)

                      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                        Terry
      D. Hildestad

                      	
                        President
      and Chief Executive Officer

                        MDU
      Resources Group, Inc.

                      	
                        750,000

                         

                      	
                        187,500

                      	
                        750,000

                      	
                        1,500,000

                      
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                        Vernon
      A. Raile

                      	
                        Executive
      Vice President, Treasurer

                         and
      Chief Financial Officer

                        MDU
      Resources Group, Inc.

                      	
                        450,000

                      	
                        73,125

                      	
                        292,500

                      	
                        585,000

                      
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                        John
      G. Harp

                      	
                        President
      and Chief Executive Officer

                        MDU
      Construction Services Group, Inc.

                      	
                        450,000

                      	
                        73,125

                      	
                        292,500

                      	
                        585,000

                      
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                        William
      E. Schneider

                      	
                        President
      and Chief Executive Officer

                        Knife
      River Corporation

                      	
                        447,400

                      	
                        72,703

                      	
                        290,810

                      	
                        581,620

                      
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                        Paul
      K. Sandness

                      	
                        General
      Counsel and Secretary

                        MDU
      Resources Group, Inc.

                      	
                        334,000

                      	
                        41,750

                      	
                        167,000

                      	
                        334,000
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas S. BATES, Appellant.

No. WD 47714.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 21, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 2, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 20, 1994.

*696James Roy Brown, Kearney, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction of forcible sodomy, § 566.060.2, RSMo.Supp.1993.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                |   |
| Date: April 20, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Todd Hays                  |   |
|                 |   | Name  Todd Hays                |   |
|                 |   | Title  Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                 |   |                                |   |

|                 |   |                      |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                 |   |                      |   |
| Date: April 20, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Richard Leimbach |   |
|                 |   | Richard Leimbach          |   |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                 |   |                      |   |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14501]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP92-237-025]


Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Filing

June 4, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 30, 1996, Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (Alabama-Tennessee), tendered for filing revised tariff sheets 
in compliance with the Commission's Order issued May 20, 1996, in the 
above-captioned docket.
    Alabama-Tennessee states that the revised tariff sheets reflect 
minor rate adjustments called for by the Commission's Order that 
Alabama-Tennessee include the revenue applicable to the Annual Charge 
Adjustment surcharge associated with the discount provided to Packaging 
Corporation of America in calculating rates pursuant to its settlement 
in Docket No. RP92-237-010.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
should be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14501 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dunn Mining Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 11, 2008





/s/ Gregory Paul Byrne

Gregory Paul Byrne, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
H. Res. 807 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 7, 2009. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he 

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Cao. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert Muir, Chief Financial Officer of Consonus Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in connection with
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
hereby certifies pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

September 5, 2008

By:

/s/ROBERT MUIRRobert Muir
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001041580
<NAME> TUNLAW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   932
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       932
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0
        

</TABLE>
#### Michael ADAMS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 66410.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Feb. 7, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied April 25, 1995.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*595Before GRIMM, C.J., and REINHARD and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Movant pled guilty to the illegal sale of a controlled substance. Pursuant to a plea bargain, he was sentenced to ten years in prison.

Movant’s statement of facts reflects that movant was delivered to the Department of Corrections on January 15, 1993. His *pro se*Rule 24.035 motion was filed December 29, 1993, more than eleven months after his delivery to the Department of Corrections.

The motion court found that the motion was untimely and dismissed it. Movant appeals, contending that the time limits in Rule 24.035(b) violate his constitutional rights. However, our supreme court disagrees and has held that the limits are valid and mandatory. *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989).

The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

The motion court’s judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.6
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(Non CEO)
 Company Employee
 RECITALS
   NOW, THEREFORE
 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
 ARTICLE I
EMPLOYMENT
 Term of Employment Employment Term Renewal Terms Renewal Term
 Position and Duties




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS
 Base Salary Base Salary
 Performance Bonus Bonus Year Performance Bonus
 Benefit Plans Plans
 Expenses
 Vacation
  2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
TERMINATION
 Right to Terminate; Automatic Termination
 Termination by Company Without Cause
 Termination by Employee for Good Reason
 Termination by Company For Cause " nolo
contendere
 Termination Upon Death or Disability
  3




---



##### 



Termination Upon Resignation or Retirement
 Rights Upon Termination; Non-Renewal by Company
 Section 3.1(a) and 3.1(b) Termination
 ,
     4




---



##### 



Section 3.1(c) and 3.1(e) Termination
 Section 3.1(d) Termination ) , )
 Termination Pursuant to a Change of Control
  
 
   5




---



##### 



Definition of Change of Control
       6




---



##### 



Exclusive Remedy; Waiver and Release
 Limitation of Benefits
 Six Month Delay
 ARTICLE IV
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Notices
 (a)
    
    If to the Company:
 
 (b)
    
    If to Employee:
 
   7




---



##### 



Entire Agreement
 Amendment
 Assignability
 Severability
 Arbitration
     8




---



##### 



Separation from Service
 Waiver of Breach
  9




---



##### 



Governing Law; Construction
  EMPLOYEE:
    

    COMPANY:Steven G. Books
    

    TomoTherapy Incorporated/s/ Steven G. Books
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Frederick A. RobertsonFrederick A. Robertson, M.D.Chief Executive Officer
  10
NO.03-14-00561-CV TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, ATAUSTIN DANADUTSCHMANN and KEVIN BIERWIRTH Appellant 

### v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTAGE ASSOCIATION Appellee.

APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FORFILING APPELLANT'S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

### Dana Dutschmann, Appellant, moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file Appellant's Brief, and respectfully states: 1. Appellant's Briefwas extended by the courtto March 19,2015. 2. Appellant seeks an extension oftime to March 19, 2015 in order to file Appellant's Brief
.. 4. This extension of time is necessary because Appellant, required additional time to research and finalize her brief. 5. This is the first extension oftime Appellant has sought for the filing his brief. Forthese reasons, Dana Dutschmann requests that this court render an order ACCEPTED 03-14-00561-CV 4681460 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:00:33 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKDanaDutschmann 13276 Research Blvd. Ste. 204 Austin, Texas 78750

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On March 27, 2015, an attempt was made to confer with Douglas Dent, attorney for the Appellee, in order to confer as to the extension but Dutschmann
was unable to reach Mr. Dent. 

# .siL.**&a/hM~~** DanaDutschmann CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On March 27,2015, a copy ofthe attached motion for extension oftime was sentbyU. S. Postal Service to: Douglas G. Dent 6836Bee Caves Road, Bldg. 3, Suite 303 

# J 

# h Austin, TX 78746

# .~v'<,**~7"F(*,**
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Secretary of Agriculture's Special Cotton Quota Announcement 
Number 12

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A special import quota for upland cotton equal to 43,624,810 
kilograms (96,176,321 pounds) is established in accordance with section 
103B(a)(5)(F) of the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended (1949 Act). 
This quota is established under Proclamation 6301 of June 7, 1991, and 
is referenced as the Secretary of Agriculture's Special Cotton Quota 
Announcement Number 12, chapter 99, subchapter III, subheading 
9903.52.12 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).

DATES: The quota was established on November 22, 1995, and applies to 
upland cotton purchased not later than February 19, 1996 (90 days from 
the date the quota was established) and entered into the United States 
not later than May 19, 1996 (180 days from the date the quota was 
established).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janise Zygmont, Farm Service Agency, 
United States Department of Agriculture, room 3756-S, PO Box 2415, 
Washington, DC 20013-2415 or call (202) 720-8841.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 1949 Act requires that a special import 
quota be determined and announced immediately if, for any consecutive 
10-week period, the Friday through Thursday average price quotation for 
the lowest-priced U.S. growth, as quoted for Middling 1\3/32\ inch 
cotton, C.I.F. northern Europe (U.S. Northern Europe price), adjusted 
for the value of any cotton user marketing certificates issued, exceeds 
the Northern Europe price by more than 1.25 cents per pound. This 
condition was met during the consecutive 10-week period that ended 
November 16, 1995. The quota amount is equal to 1 week's consumption of 
upland cotton by domestic mills at the seasonally-adjusted average rate 
of the most recent 3 months for which data are available--July 1995 
through September 1995. The special import quota identifies a quantity 
of imports that is not subject to the over-quota tariff rate of a 
tariff-rate quota. The quota is not divided by staple length or by 
country of origin. The quota does not affect existing tariff rates or 
phytosanitary regulations. The quota does not apply to Extra Long 
Staple cotton.


    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1444-2(a) and U.S. Note 6(a), Subchapter 
III, Chapter 99 of the HTS.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on December 22, 1995.
Dan Glickman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15 Filed 1-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
Exhibit 32.1
   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ernest W. Letiziano, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Date: November 15, 2010
By: /s/ Ernest W. Letiziano

Ernest W. Letiziano

Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer
   
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities