alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 818 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week and the work 

of firefighters in educating and protecting the communities of this Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. ANDREWS, and Mr. PASCRELL) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week 

and the work of firefighters in educating and protecting 

the communities of this Nation. 

Whereas since the organization of the first fire departments 

during the colonial era of this Nation, firefighters have 

maintained their dedication to protecting the health and 

safety of the American public; 

Whereas firefighters presently provide a multitude of services 

to our communities, including emergency medical services, special rescue response, hazardous material and terrorism response, and public safety education; 

Whereas 103 firefighters lost their lives in the line of duty 

in 2008; 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 818 IH 

Whereas the Nation’s fire departments respond to emergency 

calls nearly once per second and are dispatched to fire 

emergencies every 22 seconds; 

Whereas approximately 1,145,000 fires were reported in 

2008; 

Whereas firefighters always respond with courage, whether 

they are confronted with acts of terrorism, natural disasters, or other emergencies; 

Whereas Fire Prevention Week is the longest running public 

health and safety observance on record, as firefighters 

have been honored for their role in educating the American public since the first Fire Prevention Week was declared by President Warren G. Harding in 1922; 

Whereas the National Fire Protection Association has designated the week of October 4 through October 10, 2009, 

as Fire Prevention Week; and 

Whereas educating all Americans to ‘‘Stay Fire Smart’’ continues to be a priority for all firefighters: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the work of firefighters in edu3 cating and protecting the communities of this Na4 tion; and 

5 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Fire Pre6 vention Week. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc.
(“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”),
I, Zahir Teja, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  the
Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





November
      16, 2009
            By:
            /s/  Zahir
      TejaZahir
      TejaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, David L. Swift,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Goodman Global, Inc. (the Registrant) and Lawrence M. Blackburn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the period covered
by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/  DAVID L. SWIFTDavid L. SwiftPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/S/  LAWRENCE M. BLACKBURNLawrence M. BlackburnExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 7, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1501]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Public Information Collection Approved by Office of Management 
and Budget

January 22, 1996.
    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has received Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public 
information collection pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
Pub. L. 96-511. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is 
not required to respond to a collection of information unless it 
displays a currently valid control number. For further information 
contact Shoko B. Hair, Federal Communications Commission, (202) 418-
1379.

Federal Communications Commission

OMB Control No.: 3060-0682.
    Expiration Date: 01/31/99.
    Title: Construction of Stand-Alone Cable System by a Carrier in its 
Exchange Telephone Service Area--Section 63.16, CC Docket No. 87-266.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 50 total annual hours; average 1 hour per 
respondent; 50 respondents.
    Description: 47 U.S.C. 214 requires telephone companies to secure 
certification from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) before 
the construction of any ``line'' used in interstate communication. To 
enable the FCC to evaluate whether such a construction is in the public 
interest, carriers have been required to provide detailed support when 
requesting Section 214 authorizations. 47 CFR Section 63.16 permits 
most carriers who can certify that they meet three conditions to secure 
such authorization for providing service in their local service areas 
without providing such detailed support.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1501 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
#### PROMAXIMA FITNESS, INC. and Bob Leppke, Appellants, v. Sherry KEENER, Appellee.

No. 01-92-00766-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

April 29, 1993.

*822Gregory M. Cokinos, Houston, for appellants.

Gilbert Torres, Texas City, for appellee.

Before DUGGAN, O’CONNOR and HEDGES, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On February 25, 1992, we issued an order that gave the appellants notice they filed the transcript late and no party had filed a motion to extend time to file the transcript. In our order, we gave the parties 10 days to file a response to show why we should not dismiss the appeal.

The appellants filed a response and asked us to continue with the appeal. The appellants contend their motion to extend the time to file the statement of facts also requested an extension for the transcript. The appellants’ counsel concedes that the motion to extend only refers to the “statement of facts,” but explains that he thought the term “statement of facts” included the entire record from the trial court.

In the affidavit attached to the motion to extend, the appellants’ counsel recited that, “I have requested a statement of facts including *Plaintiff's Original Petition, Defendants’ Original Answer,*transcript of trial proceedings, all exhibits entered at trial, and *the final judgment*” (emphasis added). Only the transcript contains a case’s original petition, answer, and final judgment. *See*Tex.R.App.P. 51(a).

Accordingly, we interpret counsel’s use of the term “statement of facts” in the motion to extend to refer to both the transcript and statement of facts. *See Riviea v. Marine Drilling Co.,*787 S.W.2d 189, 191 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi, no writ) (court reporter’s affidavit that included request for extension to file statement of facts was interpreted to be a motion for extension of time); *McDonald v. Brennan,*704. S.W.2d 136, 139 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (motion to extend time to file the “record” interpreted to be a motion for extension to file both the transcript and statement of facts). We instruct the clerk to mark the transcript she had previously marked “received” as “filed.”

It is so ORDERED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 4 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2009.
    Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the President of the United 
States that the House of Representatives has elected Nancy Pelosi, a 
Representative from the State of California, Speaker; and Lorraine C. Miller, a 
citizen of the State of Texas, Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One 
Hundred Eleventh Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1252]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-933-1430-01; IDI-30525]


Opening of Land in a Proposed Withdrawal; Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The temporary 2-year segregation of a proposed withdrawal of 
40.00 acres of National Forest System land for the Forest Service's 
Monarch Mine Stamp Mill Site (Kirby Dam) expires March 9, 1996, after 
which the land will be opened mining. The land is located in the Boise 
National Forest. The land has been and will remain open to surface 
entry and mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 9, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry R. Lievsay, BLM Idaho State Office, 3380 American Terrace, Boise, 
Idaho 83706-2500, (208) 384-3166.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice of Proposed Withdrawal was 
published in the Federal Register (59 FR 47, March 10, 1994), which 
segregated the land described therein for up to 2 years from the mining 
laws, subject to valid existing rights, but not from the general land 
laws and the mineral leasing laws. The 2-year segregation expires March 
9, 1996. The withdrawal application will continue to be proposed unless 
it is canceled or denied. The land is described as follows:

Boise Meridian

T.5 N., R.11 E.,
    Sec. 5, lot 8.

    The area described contains 40.00 acres in Elmore County.

    At 9 a.m. on March 9, 1996, the land shall be opened to location 
and entry under the United States mining laws, subject to valid 
existing rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, other 
segregations of record, and the requirements of applicable law. 
Appropriation of land described in this order under the general mining 
laws prior to the date and time of restoration is unauthorized. Any 
such attempted appropriation, including attempted adverse possession 
under 30 U.S.C. 38 (1988), shall vest no rights against the United 
States. Acts required to establish a location and to initiate a right 
of possession are governed by State law. The Bureau of Land Management 
will not intervene in disputes between rival locators over possessory 
rights since Congress has provided for such determinations in local 
courts.

    Dated: January 18, 1996.
Jimmie Buxton,
Supervisory Realty Specialist, Lands and Minerals.
[FR Doc. 96-1252 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
EXHIBIT 99.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

The undersigned hereby certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial conditions and results of operations of the Summus, Inc. (USA).


Date:       March 31, 2003
                                           /s/ Bjorn D. Jawerth
                                           --------------------------------
                                               Bjorn D. Jawerth
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000003 04-SEP-2018 10:19 AM
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary D. Tollefson, M.D., Ph.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.;

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary D. Tollefson                
|Gary D. Tollefson, M.D., Ph.D.       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
NO. 07-03-0554-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D JULY 21, 2004

______________________________ CATHERINE MENDOZA AND ARMANDO MENDOZA AND IN THEINTER EST OF A .M., A CHILD , APPEL LANTS V. TEXAS DEPT. OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES, APPEL LEE

_________________________________ FROM THE CO UNTY COURT AT LAW OF RANDALL COUNTY; NO. 3288-L; H ONORABLE JAM ES W. ANDERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS an d CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPIN ION Appellant

Catherine M endoza, a/k/a Catherine Me ndoza M enzinni, filed a pro se notice of appeal wit h th i s court on De cember 7, 2003, appeal ing a judg ment terminating her parental ri ghts. In her notice of appeal, s he indicated that she was i ndigent. W e aba ted the a ppea l an d re mande d thecaus e so the t ria l co urt coul d determi ne i f M s . Mend oza was indi gent and entitl ed to representation by counsel in her ap peal. Tex. F am. Code Ann. § 263.405 (e) (Vernon 2002).-2-

The t rial court

held an evi dentiary he aring on April 4, 2004, and determined t ha t appellant

is not indigent. As a result, the clerk of this court notified appellant by letter on June 3, 2004, that she wa s not entitled to pr

oceed as an indi gent and order ed her to pay the appellate fili ng fee by July 2, 2004. SeeTex. R. App. P. 5. Appellant w as also notified that failure to pay the fil ing fee could r esult in dis missal. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3. That date has passed and no response has b een received.
All parties have had more t han ten days notice that di smissal coul d result from appellant’s failure to compl y wi th the rules an d this court’s orders. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Consequently , the appeal is dismissed.

James T. Campbell Justice
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7317** 

CARLOS WOODS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01260

- WDQ )

Submitted : January 24, 2013 Decided: March 7, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Carlos Woods , Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Baltimore , Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Carlos Woods seeks to a ppeal the district court’s August 1, 2012 order denying without prejudice his self

- styled

“ Motion for [T]ranscript of Post Conviction [H]earing ” and denying his self

- styled “ Motion Requesting Judge Change. ” Woods filed his notice of appeal prior to the entry on December 3, 2012 , of final judgment in the district court.
We may exercise jurisdic tion only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1 292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 47 (1949). When a notice of appeal is premature, the jurisdictional defect can be cured if the district court enters a final judgment prior to our consideration of the appeal under the doctrine of cumulative finality. Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers , 973 F.2d 345 , 347

- 48 (4th Cir. 1992). Not all premature notices of appeal, however, are subject to the cumulative finality rule. Instead, this do ctrine applies only if the appellant appeals from an order the district court could have certified for immediate appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). In re Bryson , 406 F .3d 284, 287

- 89 (4th Cir. 2005). Appeals from “clearly interlocutory decision[s]” cann ot be saved under cumulative finality. Id. at 288 (internal quotation marks omitted)
.3 The August 1 order is not a final order of the district court and is not appealable under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule. The order also is not one of the orders subject to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292
. F urther , because the district court could not have certified the order for immediate appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) , the cumulative finality rule cannot apply. Accordingly, we dismiss the ap peal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th e materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
H. Res. 556 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 9, 2009. 

Whereas, on June 26, 1934, President Franklin Roosevelt 

signed into law the Federal Credit Union Act, thus enabling credit unions to be organized throughout the United 

States under the charters approved by the Federal Government; 

Whereas the passage of the Federal Credit Union Act enabled credit unions to play an instrumental role in helping hard-working people in the United States recover 

after the Great Depression; 

Whereas credit unions have continued to exemplify the American values of thrift, self-help, and volunteerism, carving 

out a special place for themselves among the Nation’s financial institutions; 

Whereas credit unions operate with the credo, ‘‘Not for profit, not for charity, but for service’’ and have consistently 

reflected this philosophical tradition and the cooperative 

spirit of ‘‘people helping people’’ that gave birth to the 

Federal Credit Union Act; 

Whereas credit unions continue to provide valuable services to 

their members, financial alternatives for the underserved, 

and economic stimulus to our Nation even as we face a 

financial crisis today; and 
2 

•HRES 556 EH 

Whereas, June 26, 2009, will mark the 75th anniversary of 

the enactment of the Federal Credit Union Act: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

the 75th anniversary of the passage of the Federal Credit 

Union Act and the vibrant Federal credit union community 

that was created as a result of this landmark piece of legislation. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-3   Filed 06/05/18   Page 1 of 7

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-3   Filed 06/05/18   Page 2 of 7

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-3   Filed 06/05/18   Page 3 of 7

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-3   Filed 06/05/18   Page 4 of 7

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-3   Filed 06/05/18   Page 5 of 7

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-3   Filed 06/05/18   Page 6 of 7

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-3   Filed 06/05/18   Page 7 of 7