alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      4.1

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              New
      Oriental Energy & Chemical
Corp.

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              INCORPORATED
      UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
DELEWARE

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              AUTHORIZED:
      30,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR
VALUE

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              This
      Certifies That
  __________________________________________

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Is
      The Owner of
  ____________________________________________

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              FULLY
      PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE
  OF

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              New
      Oriental Energy & Chemical
Corp.

            


    

    


    Transferable
on the books of this Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate duly endorsed or assigned.  This Certificate and the
shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and
to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or
hereafter amended.  This Certificate is not valid until countersigned
by the Transfer Agent and registered by the registrar.

    


    In Witness Whereof, the
Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures
of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the
Corporation.

    


    Dated:

     

    
      
        
          	 
      	
                  /s/

                	 
      	
                  /s/

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  President

                	 
      	
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 11 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 11 Filed 07/30/18 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 2

- 00 788

- CV

IN RE TOWN OF BARTONVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF

ADJUSTMENTS and Kristi GILBERT

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard , Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 12, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF INJUNCTION DENIED

On November 26, 2012

, relator filed a petition for writ of injunction

. The court ha s

considered relator’s petition and the response of real party in interest and is of the opinion that

relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of injunction is

DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012

- 60272

- 399 , styled Bartonville Water Supply Corp. v. Kristi Gilbert

and The To wn of Bartonville Planning and Zoning Board of Adjustments

, pending in the 393rd Judicial District

Court

, Denton County, Texas, the Honorable Douglas Robison presiding.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Peck,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 12, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ John E. Peck                     
|John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Exhibit
21
 
 PMA
Capital Corporation
 Subsidiaries
of Registrant
 As
of December 31, 2008
 
 
 PMA
Capital Corporation (Pennsylvania)
 Pennsylvania
Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)*
 Pennsylvania
Manufacturers Indemnity Company (Pennsylvania)*
 Manufacturers
Alliance Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)*
 PMA
Capital Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)
 PMA
Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
 Pennsylvania
Manufacturers’ International Insurance Ltd. (Bermuda)
 Mid-Atlantic
States Investment Company (Delaware)
 High
Mountain Reinsurance, Ltd. (Cayman)
 PMA
Insurance SPC, Cayman (Cayman)
 Midlands
Holding Corporation (Oklahoma)
 Midlands
Management Corporation (Oklahoma)
 American
Agency System, Inc. (Oklahoma)
 Midlands
Claim Administrators, Inc. (Oklahoma)
 Midlands
Intermediaries, Inc. (Oklahoma)
 Midlands
Management of Texas, Inc. (Texas)
 Midlands
Management Corporation of New York (New York)
 Midlands
Injury Management, Inc. (Oklahoma)
 Underwriters
Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (Texas)
 Midlands
Underwriting Managers, Inc. (Texas)
 American
Marine Underwriters, Inc. (Texas)
 U.S.
Marine Insurance Group, Inc. (Texas)
 PMA Re
Management Company (Pennsylvania)
 PMA
Management Corp. (Pennsylvania)
 PMA Management Corp of New
England, Inc. (Connecticut)
 *These subsidiaries do
business under the name The PMA
Insurance Group.
IV 

House Calendar No. 132 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 908 

[Report No. 111–339] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2781) to amend the Wild and 

Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, 

as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2009 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2781) to amend 

the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments 

of the Molalla River in Oregon, as components of the 

National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 2781) to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to des4 ignate segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, as compo5 nents of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 908 RH 

1 for other purposes. All points of order against consider2 ation of the bill are waived except those arising under 

3 clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature 

4 of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural 

5 Resources now printed in the bill shall be considered as 

6 adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. 

7 All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amend8 ed, are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

9 as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage with10 out intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

11 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

12 minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; 

13 and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instruc14 tions. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 132 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 908 

[Report No. 111–339] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2781) 

Rivers System, and for other purposes. as components of the National Wild and Scenic ignate segments of the Molalla River in Oregon, to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desNOVEMBER 17, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-94,278-01

EX P ARTE JOHNNIE E DISON CARTER, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 15-22215-A IN THE CRIMINA L DIST RICT COURT

F ROM JEF F ERSON COUNTY

Per curiam . S L A U G H T E R , J., fi led a concurring opin ion. O P I N I O N Applicant orig inally pleade d g uilty to ag g rava ted assault and was place d on defe rre d adjudication community supervision for a period of ten y ear s. L ater , he was adjudicate d g uilty and
sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appea ls af fi rmed his conviction. Carter v. State , No. 09-20-00175- CR (Tex. App.—B eaumont J une 8, 2022) (not desig n at ed fo r publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cle rk for

war ded it to this C ourt. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that h i s conviction had been affir med and advise him of hi s rig ht to file a pro se petition for discr etionary revie w. Ba sed on the rec ord, the trial court has deter mined that appellate counsel’s perf ormanc e was2

defic ient and that Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionar y revie w but for counsel’s de ficient pe rfor mance . Relief is g rante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow , 180 S.W .3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-tim e petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Ninth Court of Appea ls in cause number 09-20-00175- CR. Should Applicant decide to file a p etition for discretionar y revie w, he must file it with this Court within thi rty

day s from the da te of this Court’s mandate. Copi e s o f th is o p in io n s h a ll be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: Novembe r 16, 2022 Do not publish
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.48

                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                 by and between
                           I.C. ISAACS & COMPANY, INC.
                                       and
                                 ROBERT J. ARNOT


         THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2, dated as of February 11, 1999, is made a part of
that certain EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as May 15,
1997, and as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of August 27, 1998, by
and between I. C. Isaacs & Company, Inc. (the "Company"), and Robert J. Arnot
(the "Executive"). It is intended by the parties that the terms of this
Amendment No. 2, to the extent that they are more specific than the terms
contained in the Agreement, or to the extent that they should conflict with the
terms contained in the Agreement, shall supersede the terms of the Agreement.
Section numbers utilized in this Amendment No. 2 correspond, where applicable,
to section numbers used in the Agreement.

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
representations contained herein and the mutual benefits derived herefrom, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. Paragraph 3 is hereby restated in its entirety as follows:

         3. BASE SALARY. The Executive's base salary for each Employment Year
         under this Agreement (May 15, 1997 through May 15, 2001) shall be at
         the rate of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350,000) per annum.
         Such base salary shall be increased to Four Hundred Thousand Dollars
         ($400,000) per annum for the remaining term of this Agreement after the
         Company achieves positive net earnings in two consequtive fiscal
         quarters. Such base salary may also be increased based on periodic
         reviews by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
         Executive's base salary shall be paid throughout the year, in
         accordance with normal payroll practices of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this
Amendment No. 2 on the date first above written.


ATTEST:                                     I.C. ISAACS & COMPANY, INC.


  /s/ Eugene C. Wielepski                   By:     /s/ Gerald W. Lear
----------------------------------             ---------------------------------
Secretary                                         Gerald W. Lear, President


<PAGE>

WITNESS:                                             EXECUTIVE


  /s/ Thomas Ormandy                                /s/ Robert J. Arnot
----------------------------------             ---------------------------------
                                                 Robert J. Arnot




                                       -2-
##### 



ATMI, INC.
Subsidiaries
 State or JurisdictionEntity
    
    of Incorporation or OrganizationAdvanced Technology Materials, Inc.
    
    DelawareEpitronics Corporation
    
    DelawareATMI Ecosys Corporation
    
    CaliforniaAdvanced Delivery & Chemical Systems Nevada, Inc.
    
    NevadaAdvanced Delivery & Chemical Systems Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareAdvanced Delivery & Chemical Systems Operating, LLC
    
    DelawareAdvanced Delivery & Chemical Systems Manager, Inc.
    
    DelawareATMI Materials, Ltd.
    
    TexasATMI Korea Co. Ltd.
    
    South KoreaATMI UK Limited
    
    ScotlandATMI Packaging, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaATMI International Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareATMI Taiwan Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareATMI Belgium Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareATMI Belgium, LLC
    
    DelawareATMI Packaging N.V.
    
    BelgiumATMI International Trading Co. Ltd.
    
    ChinaATMI Japan KK
    
    JapanATMI Taiwan Co. Ltd.
    
    TaiwanATMI GmbH
    
    GermanyATMI PTE Ltd
    
    SingaporeATMI Fab Services Ireland, Ltd
    
    IrelandATMI Acquisition BVBA
    
    BelgiumATMI Acquisition Corporation
    
    Delaware
EXHIBIT 32.1



NET TALK.COM, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)
OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of NetTalk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anastasios Kyriakides, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Anastasios Kyriakides    
|-----------------------------
|Anastasios Kyriakides        
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)



Date: August 14, 2012
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Wilson Cheung



Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer

September 12, 2007
H. Res. 745 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 16, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3246) to provide for a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application in vehicle technologies at the Department of Energy. The first 

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall 

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 

divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Science and Technology. After 

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 

under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as 

an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science and Technology now 
2 

•HRES 745 EH 

printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature 

of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under clause 10 of 

rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no 

amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 

or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the 

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 

intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 
3 

•HRES 745 EH 

SEC. 2. The Chair may entertain a motion that the 

Committee rise only if offered by the chair of the Committee 

on Science and Technology or his designee. The Chair may 

not entertain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the 

bill (as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Edward Allen Carr, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. CV-18-00416-PHX-DWL 

ORDER 

Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 8). The R&R, which was issued on October 30, 2018, 

recommended that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice and further provided 

that “[t]he parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this 

recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. . . . Failure 

timely to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation may result 

in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the district court without further 

review.” (Doc. 8 at 9.) 

Here, no such objections have been filed. Thus, the Court accepts the Magistrate 

Judge’s recommendation. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985) (“It does 

not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual 

or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to 

those findings.”); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[N]o 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 

filed.”). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1221 (9th Cir. 2003) 

(“[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 

de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”). 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 8) is accepted and adopted, that the Petition 

(Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice, and that the Clerk of Court shall enter 

judgment accordingly. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability and leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because dismissal of the Petition is 

justified by a plain procedural bar, reasonable jurists would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal 

constitutional right, and jurists of reason would not find the Court’s assessment of 

Petitioner’s constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 

 Dated this 1st day of February, 2019.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Infrastructure Materials Corp. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:
 
 The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies
with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Dated:
May 11, 2009
 
 /s/ Todd D. MontgomeryTodd
      D. MontgomeryChief
      Executive OfficerInfrastructure
      Materials Corp.
 
 Dated:
May 11, 2009
 
 /s/ Randal LudwarRandal
      LudwarChief
      Financial OfficerInfrastructure
      Materials Corp.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infrastructure Materials Corp. and will be retained by Infrastructure Materials
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.