Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 115 / Thursday, June 13, 1996 / Proposed Rules 30023

Authority: This advance notice of

proposed rulemaking is issued under the

authority in 26 U.S.C. 7805.

Signed: May 17, 1996.

Bradley A. Buckles,

Acting Director.

Approved: May 24, 1996.

John P. Simpson.

Deputy Assistant Secretary (Regulatory, Tariff

and Trade Enforcement).

[FR Doc. 96–14852 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–31–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IN59–1–7217b; FRL–5510–8]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: On August 29, 1995, the State

of Indiana submitted a State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision

request to the EPA for rule changes

specific to Allison Engine Company

(Allison) plants 5 and 8 located in

Marion County, Indiana. The EPA

proposes to approve Indiana’s request.

In the final rules section of this Federal

Register, the EPA is approving this

action as a direct final rule without

prior proposal because the EPA views

this as a noncontroversial action and

anticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for the approval is set

forth in the direct final rule. If no

adverse comments are received in

response to that direct final rule, no

further activity is contemplated in

relation to this proposed rule. If the EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on the proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting on this notice

should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received on or before July 15,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Copies of the State submittal and the

EPA’s analysis of it are available for

inspection at: Regulation Development

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Pohlman, Regulation

Development Section, Air Programs

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604, (312) 886–3299.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule published in the rules section

of this Federal Register.

Dated: May 15, 1996.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–14962 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[VA010–5545b; FRL–5514–7]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;

Proposed Approval of Alternative

Compliance Plans for the Reynolds

Metals Graphic Arts Plants

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the

State Implementation Plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the

Commonwealth of Virginia for the

purpose of establishing alternative

compliance plans for the Reynolds

Metals—Bellwood and South Plants

located in Richmond, Virginia. In the

Final Rules section of this Federal

Register, EPA is approving the State’s

SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

SIP revision and anticipates no adverse

comments. A detailed rationale for the

approval is set forth in the direct final

rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a

second comment period on this action.

Any parties interested in commenting

on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in

writing by July 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Marcia L.

Spink, Associate Director, Air Programs,

Mailcode 3AT00, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region III, 841

Chestnut Building, Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania 19107. Copies of the

documents relevant to this action are

available for public inspection during

normal business hours at the Air,

Radiation, and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 841 Chestnut Building,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 and

the Virginia Department of

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marcia L. Spink, (215) 566–2104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the

information provided in the Direct Final

action of the same title which is located

in the Rules and Regulations Section of

this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: May 17, 1996.

W. Michael McCabe,

Regional Administrator, Region III.

[FR Doc. 96–14966 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[IN61–1–7230b; FRL–5509–6]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the State Implementation Plan (SIP)

revision request submitted by the State

of Indiana on September 19, 1995, and

November 8, 1995, which establishes

regulations for suppliers and users of

automobile/mobile equipment

refinishing coatings in Clark, Floyd,

Lake, and Porter Counties. In the final

rules section of this Federal Register,

the EPA is approving this action as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because EPA views this as a

noncontroversial action and anticipates

no adverse comments. A detailed

rationale for the approval is set forth in

the direct final rule. If no adverse

comments are received in response to

that direct final rule, no further activity

is contemplated in relation to this

proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse

comments, the direct final rule will be

withdrawn and all public comments

received will be addressed in a

subsequent final rule based on the

proposed rule. Any parties interested in