alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Paul J. Kane, certify that: 

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31 2009, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

 

 (c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2009

 

/s/ Paul J. Kane______________________

 

Paul J. Kane

Chief Financial Officer

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Fernando Gastelum

209 West 9th Street

Casa Grande, AZ 85122

520-560-0927

Nando0526@msn.com

Pro Se

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Tempe Town Lake Inn LLC,

Defendant.

Case No: 2:18-cv-00697-DLR

NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF’S 

CONTACT INFORMATION

Please take notice that Plaintiff’s pro se information is this:

Fernando Gastelum

209 West 9th Street

Casa Grande, AZ 85122

520-560-0927

Nando0526@msn.com

Pro Se

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 5th day of September 2018.

Fernando Gastelum

Electronically filed by Mr. Strojnik

Case 2:18-cv-00697-DLR Document 25 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 1
Amendment dated February 16, 2009 to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.44 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of August 22, 2001, as amended by amendments dated
February 19, 2007 and December 31, 2008 (the “Current Agreement”) is between PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Tennessee corporation (the “Company”), and MICHAEL F. KILLEA (the “Executive”).

 The Company and the Executive are entering into this Amendment to formally memorialize an increase in the Executive’s base salary,
effective as of September 1, 2008. Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by
the Company and the Executive, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment to Section 4(a) of the Current Agreement.
Section 4(a) of the Current Agreement is amended as follows: 
 a. The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Current Agreement is
amended and restated in its entirety as follows, effective as of September 1, 2008: 
 “During the Employment Period, the Company
(or any of its Affiliates) shall pay the Executive a minimum annual base salary (the “Base Salary”) of $360,000, payable in such installments (but not less often than monthly) as is generally the policy of the Company with respect
to the payment of regular compensation to its executive officers. 
 2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment,
the Current Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms and provisions. 
 3. Counterparts and
Electronic Execution. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, and each such counterpart shall be an original instrument, but all such counterparts taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement, effective when
one or more counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. Any signed counterpart delivered by facsimile, email or similar electronic means
shall be deemed for all purposes to constitute such party’s good and valid execution and delivery of this Amendment. 
  

 1 of 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to the Employment Agreement to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives as of the date first listed above. 
  

			
	PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Karen Rice
		 	Karen Rice
	Title:	 	Vice President, Human Resources

  

	
	
	/s/ Michael F. Killea
	Michael F. Killea

  

 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2(a)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 Date: February 26, 2009
    By:
    /s/    HOLLI C. NICHOLSHolli C. NicholsExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) of PennantPark
Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                
|----------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat  
|Aviv Efrat      
|February 6, 2013
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-51009

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT EDWARD BEATON,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-98-CR-255-2

 

October 27, 2000

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Edward Beaton appeals his jury conviction for illegal

reentry into the United States after deportation. He argues that

the evidence was insufficient to establish that he had been

previously deported because the Government did not introduce into

evidence a copy of the order of deportation. Beaton does not

dispute that the evidence established that he was an alien and that
2

he reentered the United States without the Attorney General’s

consent to reenter. A review of the record indicates that the

evidence, including the testimony of Border Patrol Agent Patrick

Hernandez and the documents contained in the A-file No. A 36709542

such as the record of deportable alien and related warrant, INS

Form 294, and the Warrant of Deportation (Govt. Exhibits 2, 3, 4,

and 5), was sufficient to establish that Beaton had been previously

deported. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326; United States v. Ramirez-Gamez, 171

F.3d 236, 238 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 120 S.Ct. 195 (1999);

United States v. Flores-Peraza, 58 F.3d 164, 166 (5th Cir. 1995).

If it were necessary to prove that the deportation was pursuant to

an order of deportation, that was adequately shown by the

referenced documents and testimony, even though the order of

deportation itself was not put in evidence. See United States v.

Quezada, 754 F.2d 1190, 1193-95 (5th Cir. 1985).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
      31, 2007 (the "Report") of Best Care, Inc. (the "Registrant"), as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Haim Perlstein,
      the
      President, Treasurer, and Director of the Registrant, and Chaim Limor, the
      Secretary and Director of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of each
      of
      our knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:
      May
      15, 2007







Signature:  /s/
      Haim
      Perlstein





Name:  Haim
      Perlstein


Title: President,
      Treasurer,


and
      Director


(Principal
      Executive, Financial,


and
      Accounting Officer)






Signature:  /s /
      Chaim
      Limor





Name:
              Chaim Limor


Title:
                Secretary and
      Director




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David BergerDavid
      Berger
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                February
      16, 2010
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT VENET DESIR, DOC #T13847, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1580 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 26, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge. Venet Desir, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
----

 

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Joseph Blimline, the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PETROLEUM CORP. (the “Company”),DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

> 
1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended July 31, 2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed thisstatement this 7th day of January 2009.

 

/s/ Joseph Blimline 

Joseph Blimline

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive & Financial Officer)

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to AdvancedTechnology Petroleum Corp and will be retained by Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not beingfiled for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

 

----
----

 

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Joseph Blimline, the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PETROLEUM CORP. (the “Company”),DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

> 
1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended July 31, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed thisstatement this 7th day of January 2009.

 

/s/ Joseph Blimline 

Joseph Blimline

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive & Financial Officer)

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to AdvancedTechnology Petroleum Corp and will be retained by Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not beingfiled for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14285]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,312]


Cambridge Industries, Inc. Heavy Truck Division, Ionia, MI; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on May 8, 1996, in response to a worker petition which 
was filed April 9, 1996 on behalf of workers at Cambridge Industries, 
Inc., Heavy Truck Division, Ionia, Michigan (TA-W-32,312).
    The Department inadvertently instituted the petition as a Trade 
Adjustment Assistance petition, when in fact, it was a NAFTA-TAA 
petition. Consequently, further TAA investigation in this case would 
service no purpose, and the TAA investigation has been terminated. The 
NAFTA-TAA number assigned the case is NAFTA-00982.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of May 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-14285 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, James T. Healy, the chief executive
officer of LogicVision, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of
section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the
best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| | /s/ JAMEST. HEALY    | 
| | -------------------- | 
| | James
      T. Healy
| |                     
| | March
      21, 2008

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14443]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending May 31, 1996

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1423.
    Date filed: May 31, 1996.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to 
Modify Scope: June 28, 1996.
    Description: Application of Continental Airlines, Inc., pursuant 
to 49 U.S.C. Section 41102 and Subpart Q of the Department's Rules 
of Practice, requests renewal of the authority on Segment 12 of its 
certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route 29-F 
authorizing Continental to provide scheduled foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between New York 
(Newark) and Madrid and Barcelona via the Azores and Lisbon and 
beyond to points in Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Uganda, Kenya, 
Tanzania, Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, 
Yemen, United Arab Emirates, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1426.
    Date filed: May 31, 1996.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to 
Modify Scope: June 28, 1996.
    Description: Application of SouthStar Airlines, Inc., pursuant 
to 49 U.S.C. Section 41102 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, 
requests a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage 
in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property and 
mail.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 96-14443 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
H. Res. 434 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 14, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

2346) making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
2 

•HRES 434 EH 

Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-4024

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Jorge Hernandez-Reyes, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 5, 2007 Filed: January 11, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jorge Hernandez-Reyes appeals th e sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1), and one count of criminal forfeiture. His counsel has m oved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) warrants a more lenient sentence than the 78-month prison sentence imposed.-2- We conclude that the sentence is not unr easonable: the district court properly considered the section 3553(a) factors in sentencing Hernandez-Reyes at the bottom of the Guidelines range, and we see nothing inthe record to rebut the presumption that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Lincoln , 413 F.3d 716, 717-18 (8th Cir.) (when sentence is within Guidelin es range, defendant bears burden to rebut presumption of reasonableness; burden is satisfied by showing, with reference to § 3553(a), that district court based sentence on improper or irrelevant factor or failed to consider relevant factor), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 840 (2005).
Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we deny Hernandez-Reyes’s motion for appointment of new counsel.

______________________________