Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices 29371

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of Jan. 22 through Jan. 26, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Jan. 22, 1996 Archie M. LeGrand, Jr., Summerton, South

Carolina.

VFA–0120 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

December 11, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by the Freedom of Information Privacy Act

Division would be rescinded, and Archie M. LeGrand, Jr.

would receive access to certain Department of Energy

Information.

Do ........... Barton J. Bernstein, Stanford, California ...... VFA–0117 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

December 22, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by Albuquerque Operations Office would

be rescinded, and Barton J. Bernstein would receive access to certain DOE information.

Do ........... Jeffrey R. Leist, Mentor, Ohio ...................... VFA–0119 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

December 27, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by the DOE Mound Facility would be rescinded, and Jeffrey R. Leist would receive access to

certain DOE information.

Do ........... Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chelsey Co.,

Cincinnati, Ohio.

VFA–0118 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

August 9, 1995 Freedom of information Request Denial

issued by the DOE Mound Facility would be rescinded,

and Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chelsey Co. would receive access to certain DOE information.

Jan. 23, 1996 Martha Julian, Newburgh, Indiana ............... VFA–0121 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 8, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Albuquerque Operations Office would be

rescinded, and Martha Julian would receive access to

certain DOE information.

Jan. 24, 1996 Frank Thompson Transport, El Dorado, Arizona.RR272–230 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 23, 1996 Dismissal Letter, Case Number RF272–78153, issued to

Frank Thompson Transport would be modified regarding

the firm’s application for refund submitted in the Crude

Oil Refund Proceeding.

Jan. 25, 1996 Eugene Maples, Hopkins, South Carolina ... VFA–0122 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

November 29, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by the Office of Inspector General would

be rescinded, and Eugene Maples would receive certain

Department of Energy information.

Do ........... James H. Stebbings, Naperville, Illinois ....... VFA–0123 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 4, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Argonne National Laboratory would be rescinded, and James H. Stebbings would receive access

to certain DOE information.

Jan. 26, 1996 Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office, West Mifflin, Pennsylvania.VSO–0081 Request for Hearing under 10 C.F.R. Part 710. If granted:

An individual employed at Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office would receive a hearing under 10 C.F.R. Part 710,

entitled ‘‘Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear

Material.’’

[FR Doc. 96–14578 Filed 6–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Implementation of Special Refund

Procedures

AGENCY: Office of Hearings and Appeals,

Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Implementation of

Special Refund Procedures.

SUMMARY: The Office of Hearings and

Appeals of the Department of Energy

announces procedures for the

disbursement of $592,001 (plus accrued

interest) collected pursuant to a consent

order with Macmillan Oil Company

(Case No. LEF–0046) and $15,822 (plus

accrued interest) collected pursuant to a

consent order with Kenny Larson Oil

Company (Case No. VEF–0002). The

funds will be distributed in accordance

with the DOE’s special refund

procedures, 10 CFR part 205, subpart V.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bryan F. MacPherson, Assistant

Director, Office of Hearings and

Appeals, Department of Energy,

Washington, DC. 20585, (202) 426–1562.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In

accordance with § 205.282(b) of the

procedural regulations of the

Department of Energy (DOE), 10 CFR

§ 205.282(b), notice is hereby given of

the issuance of the Decision and Order

set out below. The Decision and Order

specifies the procedures that will be

used to distribute monies that have been

collected by the DOE pursuant to

consent orders with Macmillan Oil

Company (Macmillan) and Kenny

Larson Oil Company (Larson). The

consent order with Macmillan settled

possible pricing violations with respect

to Macmillan’s sales of propane, No. 2

fuel oil and Nos. 5 and 6 residual fuel

oil. The DOE has collected $592,001

from Macmillan. The consent order with

Larson settled possible pricing

violations with respect to Larson’s sales

of motor gasoline. The DOE has
29372 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices

1One Larson customer (Portland General Electric)

and three Macmillan customers (Iowa Power &

Light, Atlantic Municipal Utilities, and Iowa South

Utilities) are public utilities. As in other Subpart V

proceedings, we will treat the utilities as end-users.

Since each of their potential refunds is less than

$5,000, we will not require them to submit the type

of certification of pass-through required of public

utilities that receive refunds in excess of the $5,000

small claims threshold. See, e.g., Placid Oil Co., 18

DOE ¶ 85,176 at 88,290 (1988).

collected $15,822 from Larson. The

Decision and Order finds that the funds

should be distributed to the firms that

were overcharged as set forth in DOE

audit records. The amount of each firm’s

potential refund is set forth in the

Appendices to the Decision and Order.

Applications for Refund must be filed

prior to December 31, 1996 and should

contain the information specified in the

Decision and Order.

Dated: May 29, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Department of Energy

Washington, DC 20585

May 29, 1996.

DECISION AND ORDER OF THE

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Special Refund Procedures

Name of Firms: Macmillan Oil Company,

Kenny Larson Oil Company

Dates of Filings: June 5, 1992, October 18,

1994

Case Numbers: LEF–0046, VEF–0002.

In accordance with the procedural

regulations of the Department of Energy

(DOE), 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V, the

Economic Regulatory Administration (ERA)

filed Petitions to Implement of Special

Refund Procedures with the Office of

Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on June 5,

1992, and on October 18, 1994. The petitions

request that the OHA formulate and

implement procedures to distribute funds

received pursuant to consent orders entered

into between the DOE and Kenny Larson Oil

Company (Larson) of Oregon City, Oregon,

and Macmillan Oil Company (Macmillan) of

Des Moines, Iowa. After reviewing the

records in the present cases, we have

concluded that a Subpart V proceeding is an

appropriate mechanism for distributing the

Larson and Macmillan consent order funds.

We therefore shall grant the ERA’s petitions

and assume jurisdiction over distribution of

the funds.

I. Background

Larson and Macmillan were ‘‘resellerretailers’’ as defined in 6 C.F.R. § 150.352 and

10 C.F.R. § 212.31. During the relevant

periods these companies were subject to the

Mandatory Petroleum Price Regulations, 10

C.F.R. Part 212, Subpart F. An ERA audit of

Larson’s business records revealed possible

pricing violations with respect to the firm’s

sales of motor gasoline during the period

May through December 1979. An ERA audit

of Macmillan’s business records revealed

possible pricing violations with respect to the

firm’s sales of propane, No. 2 fuel oil, and

Nos. 5 and 6 residual fuel oil during the

period November 1, 1973, through April 30,

1974. In order to settle all claims and

disputes between these companies and the

DOE regarding their compliance with the

price regulations, the DOE entered into

consent orders with Larson and Macmillan

on September 21, 1981, and March 7, 1988,

respectively.

In the Larson consent order, the firm

agreed to remit a total of $7,415,

approximately 38 percent of the amount of

the overcharges alleged by the DOE, plus

installment interest. Of the principal amount,

$5,842 was to be remitted to the DOE, and

$1,573 was to be paid directly to six of

Larson’s customers. Larson failed to comply

with the Consent Order and remitted no

funds to either the DOE or the six customers.

On August 29, 1994, we granted Larson a

refund of $15,822 in the Texaco special

refund proceeding. Texaco Inc./Kenny

Larson Oil Company, 24 DOE ¶ 85,081 (1994)

(Texaco/Larson). At that time, Larson was in

default in the amount of $26,168 ($7,415

principal plus $18,753 interest) in its

obligations pursuant to the Consent Order.

Accordingly, in Texaco/Larson, we

determined that the Texaco refund should be

used to fund Larson’s consent order escrow

account, in satisfaction of the firm’s principal

settlement amount and partial satisfaction of

its debt for interest accrued. Accordingly, the

$15,822 Texaco refund was deposited into

the Kenny Larson Oil Company escrow

account maintained at the Department of the

Treasury, Consent Order No. 000H00439.

This is the amount which is available for

distribution to Larson’s customers in this

proceeding.

On February 1, 1983, a Proposed Remedial

Order was issued to Macmillan which

alleged that the firm violated the price

regulations with respect to its sales of

propane, No. 2 fuel oil, and Nos. 5 and 6

residual fuel oil. Macmillan contested the

PRO before OHA (Case No. HRO–0122).

During the course of that proceeding, the

ERA reduced the amount of the alleged

overcharges from $383,268 to $333,853. See

Letter from Ann C. Grover, Associate

Solicitor, ERA, to Richard T. Tedrow, OHA

Deputy Director (October 5, 1987). On March

7, 1988, Macmillan and DOE entered into a

consent order that settled the PRO’s

allegations. Pursuant to the consent order

obligation, Macmillan remitted a total

amount of $592,001 (including presettlement interest) to the DOE in full

satisfaction of the amount owed. The audit

workpapers identify the customers that

Macmillan allegedly overcharged.

II. Refund Procedures

On August 2, 1995, a Proposed Decision

and Order was issued that tentatively

concluded that the procedures set forth

below should govern the distribution of

funds received pursuant to the Macmillan

and Larson consent orders. That Proposed

Decision was published in the Federal

Register, and interested parties were given 30

days in which to comment. 60 Fed. Reg.

40580 (August 9, 1995). No comments were

received. Accordingly, we find that the

procedures described in the Proposed

Decision, and which are set forth below,

should govern the distribution of the

Macmillan and Larson consent order funds.

A. Refund Claimants

In the first stage, refund monies will be

distributed to those parties which were

directly injured in transactions with Larson

and Macmillan during the audit periods. We

believe that the Larson and Macmillan

customers who were adversely affected by

the alleged overcharges are primarily those

purchasers specifically identified in the

consent orders and in the audit papers. In

addition, customers who purchased motor

gasoline from the three retail outlets operated

by Larson were referred to as a class in the

ERA audit files but could not be individually

identified. These parties may also file for

refunds in this proceeding.

Based on the information we have about

Larson’s business, we expect that all

applicants in the Larson proceeding and most

applicants in the Macmillan proceeding will

be ultimate consumers. As in many other

refund proceedings, we are making a finding

that end-users or ultimate consumers whose

businesses are unrelated to the petroleum

industry were injured by the overcharges

covered by the Consent Order. Unlike

regulated firms in the petroleum industry,

members of this group were generally not

subject to price controls during the audit

period and were not required to keep records

which justified selling-price increases by

reference to cost increases. See, e.g., Marion

Corp., 12 DOE ¶ 85,014 (1984); Thornton Oil

Corp., 12 DOE ¶ 85,112 (1984). For these

reasons, an analysis of the impact of the

increased cost of petroleum products on the

final prices of non-petroleum goods and

services would be beyond the scope of this

special refund proceeding. See Office of

Enforcement, 10 DOE ¶ 85,072 (1983); see

also Texas Oil & Gas Corp., 12 DOE ¶ 85,069

at 88,209 (1984). Therefore the end-users of

Larson and Macmillan petroleum products

named in the consent orders or workpapers

shall be presumed injured by the alleged

overcharges. Other end-user applicants in the

Larson proceeding (those purchasing from

retail outlets), if any, need only demonstrate

that they purchased from Larson and

document their purchase volumes to make a

sufficient showing that they were injured by

the alleged overcharges.1

We expect some of the applicants in the

Macmillan proceeding to be resellers or

retailers. With respect to such applicants, we

shall adopt a small-claims threshold of

$5,000. Reseller or retailer applicants seeking

refunds of $5,000 or less will not be required

to demonstrate that they were injured by

Macmillan’s alleged overcharges. In addition,

one former customer of Macmillan, E.L.

Bride, appears to be a reseller whose

potential refund amount is $141,986.

Consistent with prior cases, it will be able to

obtain a refund of $50,000 without making a

demonstration that it was injured by

Macmillan’s overcharges. In order to obtain

a refund of its full overcharge amount, it

would have to show that it was injured by

the overcharges. See Gulf Oil Corp., 16 DOE
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices 29373

2The volumetric factor was computed by dividing

$12,467 (78.8 percent of the $15,822 collected for

the Larson escrow account) by 1,016,250 (the

approximate volume of motor gasoline sold to retail

customers during the audit period).

3Under the Privacy Act of 1974, the submission

of a social security number by an individual

applicant is voluntary. An applicant that does not

wish to submit a social security number must

submit an employer identification number if one

exists. This information will be used in processing

refund applications, and is requested pursuant to

our authority under the Petroleum Overcharge

Distribution and Restitution Act of 1986 and the

regulations codified at 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart

V. The information may be shared with other

Federal agencies for statistical, auditing or

archiving purposes, and with law enforcement

agencies when they are investigation a potential

violation of civil or criminal law. Unless an

applicant claims confidentiality, this information

will be available to the public in the Public

Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and

Appeals.

¶ 85,381 at 88,738 (1987); Marathon

Petroleum Co., 14 DOE ¶ 85,269 at 88,510

(1986).

B. Calculation of Refund Amount

As stated above, the audits which gave rise

to the Macmillan Consent Order identified all

of the customers allegedly overcharged

during the audit period. In total, there are 66

identified customers who were allegedly

overcharged by Macmillan during its refund

period. The Larson audit identified six

customers which account for 21.2 percent of

the alleged overcharges, while the remaining

78.8 percent of the alleged overcharges were

attributed to Larson’s sales to customers at its

retail stations. With respect to the identified

customers of Larson and Macmillan, we have

determined that the use of the audit results

to establish potential refunds on a firmspecific basis is more accurate than any other

method to relate probable injury to refund

amount.

We shall therefore base the identified

customers’ potential refunds on the amount

that each of these firms was allegedly

overcharged, as determined by the ERA

audit. Thus, the principal amount of each

firm’s maximum refund is 100 percent of the

amount designated for that firm in the

Consent Order plus a pro rata share of the

interest that the DOE has collected on that

amount. (For Larson, the latter is

approximately 45 percent of the interest that

Larson actually owed at the time the money

was placed in the escrow account.) The firms

and their potential refund amounts are listed

in the Appendices to this Decision. In

addition, to the amounts indicated in the

Appendices, each successful claimant will

receive a pro rata share of the interest

accrued on the consent order funds between

the date the funds were placed in the Larson

and Macmillan escrow accounts and the date

the claimant’s refund is disbursed.

We shall use a volumetric methodology to

distribute that portion of the consent order

fund attributable to purchases from Larson’s

retail outlets. Under the volumetric

methodology, customers at Larson’s retail

outlets will be eligible to receive a refund

equal to the number of gallons of motor

gasoline purchased from Larson from May

through December 1979 multiplied by the

volumetric factor. The volumetric factor for

Larson is equal to $0.0123.2 We also establish

a minimum amount of $15 for refund claims,

as the cost of processing claims in which

refunds are sought for amounts less than $15

outweighs the benefits of restitution in those

situations. See, e.g., Uban Oil Co., 9 DOE

¶ 82,541 at 82,225 (1982); see also 10 C.F.R.

§ 205.286(b). Therefore, retail outlet

customers must have purchased at least 1,220

gallons of Larson motor gasoline during the

Larson audit period in order to be eligible for

a refund.

C. Distribution of Remaining Funds

Any funds that remain after all first-stage

claims have been decided will be distributed

in accordance with the provisions of the

Petroleum Overcharge Distribution and

Restitution Act of 1986 (PODRA), 15 U.S.C.

§§ 4501–07. PODRA requires that the

Secretary of Energy determine annually the

amount of oil overcharge funds that will not

be required to refund monies to injured

parties in Subpart V proceedings and make

those funds available to state governments for

use in four energy conservation programs.

The Secretary has delegated these

responsibilities to OHA. Any funds in the

Larson and Macmillan escrow account that

OHA determines will not be needed to effect

direct restitution to injured Larson and

Macmillan customers will be distributed in

accordance with the provisions of PODRA.

III. Requirements for Refund Applications

To apply for a refund from any of the

settlement funds, a claimant should submit

an Application for Refund containing all of

the following information:

(1) Identifying information including the

claimant’s name, current business address,

taxpayer identification number, the name,

title, and telephone number of a person to

contact for additional information, and the

name and address of the person who should

receive any refund check.3

(2) Describe any change in ownership of

the applicant firm since the refund period. If

the applicant claims a refund as an heir or

assignee of the person or firm that purchased

products from Larson or Macmillan it should

explain why it should receive the refund.

(3) A statement whether the applicant or a

related firm has filed, or has authorized any

individual to file on its behalf, any other

application in this refund proceeding. If so,

an explanation of the circumstances of the

other filing or authorization should be

submitted.

(4) If the applicant is or was in any way

affiliated with the consenting firms, it should

explain this affiliation.

(5) The statement listed below signed by

the individual applicant or a responsible

official of the firm filing the refund

application:

I swear (or affirm) that the information

contained in this application and its

attachments is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge and belief. I understand that

anyone who is convicted of providing false

information to the federal government may

be subject to a fine, a jail sentence, or both,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001. I understand

that the information contained in this

application is subject to public disclosure.

Each applicant for which an address

appears in the Appendices will be mailed a

sample application form that may be used,

but which is not required. Copies will be sent

to any other party upon request. Each

applicant must submit an original and one

copy of the application. All refund

applications should be postmarked no later

than December 31, 1996, and be sent to:

Macmillan Oil Company [or] Kenny Larson

Oil Company, Special Refund Proceeding,

Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department

of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585–0107.

It Is Therefore Ordered That:

(1) Applications for Refund from the funds

remitted to the Department of Energy by

Kenny Larson Oil Company pursuant to the

September 21, 1981 Consent Order may now

be filed. The funds will be distributed in

accordance with the foregoing Decision.

(2) Applications for Refund from the funds

remitted to the Department of Energy by

Macmillan Oil Company pursuant to the

March 7, 1988 Consent Order may now be

filed. The funds will be distributed in

accordance with the foregoing Decision.

(3) To be considered, all Applications for

Refund must be postmarked no later than

December 31, 1996.

Dated: May 29, 1996.

George B. Breznay.

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
29374 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices

APPENDIX A.—MACMILLAN CUSTOMERS AND THEIR POTENTIAL REFUND AMOUNTS

Customer name Overcharge

amount

Pre-settlement

interest

Potential

refund

amount

ACE LINES, INC., c/o T.C. MILLER, P.O. BOX 8088, DES MOINES IA 50301 .................................... $223 $172 $395

ARMSTRONG RUBBER, 2345 E MARKET ST, DES MOINES IA 50317–7598 ................................... $17,982 $13,904 $31,886

ASSOCIATED MILK PRODUCERS, 305 19TH ST SW, MORGAN CITY IA 50401 .............................. $635 $491 $1,126

ATLANTIC MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, 15 W 3RD ST, ATLANTIC IA 50022–1055 ................................... $694 $537 $1,231

BANKERS LIFE CO., 7524 HICKMAN RD, DES MOINES IA 50322 ..................................................... $2,068 $1,599 $3,667

BEAVER VALLEY CANNING .................................................................................................................. $4,922 $3,806 $8,728

BELL WATCHER ..................................................................................................................................... $1,834 $1,418 $3,252

BITUCOTE PRODUCTS CO ................................................................................................................... $14 $11 $25

BOESEN THE FLORIST, 3422 BEAVER AVE, DES MOINES IA 50310–3241 ..................................... $285 $220 $505

BOOKEY PACKING, & MORTON BOOKEY, 3002 SW 30TH ST, DES MOINES IA 50321 ................. $843 $652 $1,495

C&K ENTERPRISES ................................................................................................................................ $360 $278 $638

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL ...................................................................................................................... $7 $5 $12

COLLEGE OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 3200 GRAND AVE, DES MOINES IA 50312–4104 ............... $222 $172 $394

CREES ENTERPRISES ........................................................................................................................... $1,015 $785 $1,800

CROUSE CARTAGE, 5185 NE 22ND ST, DES MOINES IA 50313–2521 ............................................ $414 $320 $734

DAKOTA OIL CO ..................................................................................................................................... $650 $503 $1,153

DES MOINES COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 1100 7TH ST, DES MOINES IA 50314 ................................ $411 $318 $729

DES MOINES INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS, 1800 GRAND AVE, DES MOINES IA 50309 ................... $10,035 $7,759 $17,794

E.L. BRIDE COMPANY, P.O. BOX 7470, SHAWNEE MISSION KS 66207 .......................................... $80,066 $61,920 $141,986

ELVIEW CONSTRUCTION, 806 S ANKENY, ANKENY IA .................................................................... $1,345 $1,040 $2,385

EMCO INDUSTRIES, 220 NEW YORK AVE, DES MOINES IA 50313 ................................................. $520 $402 $922

EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO., 13300 HICKMAN RD, DES MOINES IA 50325–8617 ............... $4,736 $3,662 $8,398

EVERDS BROS ....................................................................................................................................... $213 $165 $378

FIDELITY WAREHOUSE, c/o JACOBSON WAREHOUSE CO, 1500 DELAWARE AVE, DES

MOINES IA ........................................................................................................................................... $3,146 $2,432 $5,578

FIRESTONE, 2 AVE & HOFFMAN RD, DES MOINES IA 50309 ........................................................... $196 $152 $348

FORT DODGE TRANSPORT, c/o GORDON OLSON, 707 7TH AVE N, FT. DODGE IA 50501 .......... $517 $400 $917

GEORGE A. HORMEL & CO., NORTH LINN, ATLANTIC IA 50022 ...................................................... $11,756 $9,090 $20,846

GREENFIELD OIL CO. ............................................................................................................................ $1,019 $788 $1,807

H. WEST CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................................................... $25 $19 $44

HOTEL DES MOINES .............................................................................................................................. $325 $251 $576

HOTEL FT. DES MOINES, 10 & WALNUT, DES MOINES IA 50309 .................................................... $3,494 $2,702 $6,196

HOWE LAUNDRY, c/o GENE E. HOWE, 1311 WEST AVENUE, DES MOINES IA ............................. $1,093 $845 $1,938

INLAND MILLS, c/o ADM MILLING CO, 1925 E GRAND, DES MOINES IA ......................................... $2,565 $1,983 $4,548

IOWA POWER AND LIGHT, 311 ALIX ST, RED OAK IA 51566–1001 ................................................. $4,352 $3,365 $7,717

IOWA ROAD BUILDERS, c/o CARL H. EDMAN, 700 58TH ST, WEST DES MOINES IA 50266 ........ $4,379 $3,386 $7,765

IOWA SOUTH UTILITIES, 18 S, MAIN ST., ALBA IA 52531 ................................................................. $409 $316 $725

KECK, INC., 301 SW 9TH ST, DES MOINES IA 50309 ......................................................................... $1,071 $828 $1,899

KRIZAN, CHARLES ................................................................................................................................. $556 $430 $986

LITTLE GIANT CRANE, 1601 NE 66TH AVE, DES MOINES IA 50313–1237 ...................................... $652 $504 $1,156

LOCAL 334, MUSICIANS UNION, 82 MULBERRY ST, WATERLOO IA 50703 .................................... $99 $77 $176

MAYTAG, 1 DEPENDABILITY SQ, NEWTON IA 50208–9238 .............................................................. $88,470 $68,405 $156,875

MEREDITH PUBLISHING CO., 1716 LOCUST, DES MOINES IA 50309 ............................................. $2,721 $2,104 $4,825

MOTT CONSTRUCTION, 3675 E T C JESTER BLVD, HOUSTON TX 77018 ..................................... $523 $404 $927

NATIONAL GYPSUM, 2001 REXFORD RD, CHARLOTTE NC 28211 .................................................. $508 $393 $901

NEW MONROE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, 407 PLAINSMEN RD, MONROE IA 50170 ....................... $2,111 $1,632 $3,743

PARKER OIL CO., 7TH & RACCOON SE, DES MOINES IA 50309 ..................................................... $746 $577 $1,323

PEPSI COLA BOTTLERS, 3825 106TH ST, DES MOINES IA 50322–2098 ......................................... $957 $740 $1,697

RALSTON PURINA, 433 S PINE ST, DAVENPORT IA 52802–2800 .................................................... $1,281 $990 $2,271

SAVORY HOTEL, 4TH & LOCUST, DES MOINES IA ........................................................................... $3,617 $2,797 $6,414

SENDLER STONE PRODUCTS .............................................................................................................. $193 $149 $342

SHAVER OIL CO., c/o BERWIN P. SHAVER, 2203 W. LINCOLN WAY, MARSHALLTOWN IA 50158 $582 $450 $1,032

STARK HEATING, c/o RALPH STANLEY, 1229 SANFORD AVE, MARSHALLTOWN IA 50158 ......... $761 $588 $1,349

STATE OF IOWA, c/o ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, HOOVER BUILDING, DES MOINES IA

50319 .................................................................................................................................................... $1,222 $945 $2,167

DEP’T OF GENERAL SERVICES, c/o ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, HOOVER BUILDING,

DES MOINES IA 50319 ....................................................................................................................... $3,092 $2,391 $5,483

STATE OF IOWA BLDG., c/o ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, HOOVER BUILDING, DES

MOINES IA 50319 ................................................................................................................................ $183 $141 $324

SWIFT & CO., 406 E 8TH ST, VILLISCA IA 50846 ................................................................................ $1,766 $1,365 $3,131

SWIFT EDIBLE OIL CO. .......................................................................................................................... $8,054 $6,227 $14,281

TARGET READY MIX, c/o BILLY H BRYANT, 405 52ND ST, WEST DES MOINES IA 50265 ........... $18,175 $14,053 $32,228

UNIV OF IOWA, 1111 9TH ST, DES MOINES IA 50314–2527 ............................................................. $21,616 $16,713 $38,329

UNIV OF N. IOWA, 802 W 29TH ST, CEDAR FALLS IA 50613 ............................................................ $4,519 $3,494 $8,013

VA HOSPITAL .......................................................................................................................................... $12 $9 $21

VETERANS MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM, 833 5TH AVE, DES MOINES IA 50309–1316 ...................... $1,009 $780 $1,789

WEST TOWERS BUILDING, MANAGER, 1200 VALLEY WEST DR, WEST DES MOINES IA 50265 $3,406 $2,634 $6,040

WESTERN ELECTRIC, c/o ABIGALE KERPNER, AT&T, 1 OAK WAY, RM 4WD175, BERKELEY

HEIGHTS NJ 07922 ............................................................................................................................. $952 $736 $1,688

WILSON & CO., c/o WILLIAM AMALONG, 3133 PRARIE ROSE RD, OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73120 $1,822 $1,409 $3,231
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices 29375

APPENDIX A.—MACMILLAN CUSTOMERS AND THEIR POTENTIAL REFUND AMOUNTS—Continued

Customer name Overcharge

amount

Pre-settlement

interest

Potential

refund

amount

YOUNKERS, 7 & WALNUT, DES MOINES IA 50314 ............................................................................ $407 $315 $722

TOTAL ........................................................................................................................................... $333,853 $258,148 $592,001

APPENDIX B.—KENNY LARSON CUSTOMERS AND THEIR POTENTIAL REFUND AMOUNTS

Customer name Overcharge

amount

Interest

collected

Potential

principal

refund

SCHULTZ SANITARY SERVICE, 10643 NE SIMPSON, PORTLAND OR 97220–1223 ....................... $416 $471 $887

B & C TOWING ........................................................................................................................................ $96 $109 $205

D & A SUPPLY, 1169 MOLALLA AVE, OREGON CITY OR 97045 ....................................................... $91 $101 $192

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC, LEGAL DEPARTMENT, 121 SW SALMON ST, PORTLAND OR

97204 .................................................................................................................................................... $685 $773 $1,458

LARRY HEPLER ...................................................................................................................................... $93 $109 $202

SKIG NAGAL FARMS .............................................................................................................................. $192 $219 $411

RETAIL CUSTOMERS ............................................................................................................................. $5,842 $6,625 $12,467

TOTAL ........................................................................................................................................... $7,415 $8,407 $15,822

[FR Doc. 96–14577 Filed 6–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting

The following notice of meeting is

published pursuant to section 3(a) of the

Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub.

L. No. 94–409), 5 U.S.C. 552B:

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission.

DATE AND TIME: June 12, 1996, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 2C, 888 First Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Agenda.

Note.—Items listed on the agenda may be

deleted without further notice.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Telephone

(202) 208–0400. For a recording listing

items stricken from or added to the

meeting, call (202) 208–1627.

This is a list of matters to be

considered by the Commission. It does

not include a listing of all papers

relevant to the items on the agenda;

however, all public documents may be

examined in the reference and

information center.

Consent Agenda—Hydro, 654th Meeting—

June 12, 1996, Regular Meeting (10:00 a.m.)

CAH–1.

Docket# P–9248, 012, Town of Telluride,

Colorado

CAH–2.

Docket# P–2315, 002, South Carolina

Electric & Gas Company

CAH–3.

Docket# P–2331, 002, Duke Power

Company

CAH–4.

Docket# P–2332, 003, Duke Power

Company

CAH–5.

Docket# P–2645, 029, Niagara Mohawk

Power Corporation

CAH–6.

Docket# P–10199, 000, City of Klamath

Falls, Oregon

Consent Agenda—Electric

CAE–1.

Docket# ER94–35, 000, Central Vermont

Public Service Corporation and Green

Mountain Power Corporation

CAE–2.

Docket# ER96–1316, 000, Transalta

Enterprises Corporation

CAE–3.

Docket# ER96–1485, 000, Illinois Power

Company

CAE–4.

Docket# ER96–1580, 000, Minnesota Power

& Light Company

CAE–5.

Omitted

CAE–6.

Docket# ER96–688, 000, Northwest Power

Marketing Company, L.L.C.

CAE–7.

Docket# ER93–777, 000, Commonwealth

Edison Company

Other#S ER93–777, 002, Commonwealth

Edison Company

ER93–777, 003, Commonwealth Edison

Company

ER95–371, 000, Commonwealth Edison

Company

ER95–371, 001, Commonwealth Edison

Company

ER95–1539, 000, Commonwealth Edison

Company

ER95–1545, 000, Commonwealth Edison

Company

CAE–8.

Docket# EC95–16, 003, Wisconsin Electric

Power Company and Northern States

Power Company (Minnesota), et al.

Other#S EL95–61, 000, Wisconsin Electric

Power Corporation

EL95–68, 000, Wisconsin Public Power

Incorporated, et al. v. Wisconsin Electric

Power Corporation

ER94–1625, 000, Wisconsin Electric Power

Company

ER95–264, 000, Wisconsin Electric Power

Company

ER95–1084, 000, Wisconsin Electric Power

Company

ER95–1357, 003, Wisconsin Electric Power

Company and Northern States Power

Company (Minnesota), et al.

ER95–1358, 003, Wisconsin Electric Power

Company and Northern States Power

Company

ER95–1474, 000, Wisconsin Electric Power

Company

CAE–9.

Docket# EC95–16, 004, Wisconsin Electric

Power Company and Northern States

Power Company (Minnesota), et al.

Other#S ER95–1357, 004, Wisconsin

Electric Power Company and Northern

States Power Company (Minnesota), et

al.

ER95–1358, 004, Wisconsin Electric Power

Company and Northern States Power

Company

CAE–10.

Docket# ER95–267, 006, New England

Power Company

CAE–11.

Docket# EF95–5171, 001, United States

Department of Energy—Western Area

Power Administration (Salt Lake City

Area Integrated Projects)

CAE–12.

Omitted

CAE–13.