alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29106-29107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14432]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Center for Human Genome Research; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Center for Human Genome Research Special 
Emphasis Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.
    Name of Committee: National Center for Human Genome Research 
Special Emphasis Panel 01.
    Date: June 24, 1996.
    Time: 7:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Natcher (Building 45), Rooms G1/G2, 9000 Rockville 
Pike, Bethesda, Maryland
    Contact Person: Ms. Linda Engel, Chief, Office of Scientific 
Review, National Center for Human Genome Research, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 38A, Room 604, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 402-0838.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Human Genome Research 
Special Emphasis Panel 02.
    Date: June 25, 1996.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: NIH, Natcher (Building 45), Rooms G1/G2, 9000 Rockville 
Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    Contact Person: Ms. Linda Engel, Chief, Office of Scientific 
Review, National Center for Human Genome Research, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 38A, Room 604, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 402-0838.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Human Genome Research 
Special Emphasis Panel 03.
    Date: June 25, 1996.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: NIH, Natcher (Building 45), Rooms F1/F2, 9000 Rockville 
Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    Contact Person: Ms. Linda Engel, Chief, Office of Scientific 
Review, National Center for Human Genome Research, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 38A, Room 604, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 402-0838.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
applications and/or contract proposals, and the discussions could 
reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 29107]]


    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to the 
meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the grant review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research.)

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-14432 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-60625

Summary Calendar

RAFAEL MARTINEZ RODRIGUEZ, also known as Rafael Martinez,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petitions for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A036 421 288

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rafael Martinez Rodriguez (Martinez), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of both the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

(BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings and his motion to 

reconsider that denial. He does not challenge the BIA’s holding that his motion 

to reopen was untimely under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) and 8 C.F.R. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 28, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-60625 Document: 00512817095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2014
No. 13-60625

§ 1003.2(c) but, rather, argues only that the BIA abused its discretion by 

holding that (1) the departure bar set forth in § 1003.2(d) prevented it from 

exercising its sua sponte authority to reopen and (2) even if the departure bar 

did not apply, sua sponte reopening pursuant to § 1003.2(a) was not warranted. 

Contrary to Martinez’s assertions, this court lacks jurisdiction to 

consider his challenge to the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua sponte 

authority to reopen. See Ramos-Bonilla v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th 

Cir. 2008). As Martinez’s motion to reopen was time barred, we need not 

address his arguments regarding the BIA’s application of the departure bar. 

See id. His petitions for review are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

2

 Case: 13-60625 Document: 00512817095 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2014
H. Res. 734 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 29, 2009. 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States was signed on 

September 17, 1787, by 39 delegates from 12 States; 

Whereas the Constitution was subsequently ratified by each 

of the original 13 States; 

Whereas the Constitution was drafted in order to form a 

more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic 

tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the 

general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty for the 

citizens of the United States; 

Whereas the Constitution has provided the means and structure for this Nation and its citizens that is unparalleled 

by any other country; 

Whereas the Constitution’s contributions to the welfare of the 

human race reach far beyond the borders of the United 

States; 

Whereas the House of Representatives continues to strive to 

preserve and strengthen the values and rights bestowed 

by the Constitution upon the United States and its citizens; 

Whereas the Constitution is recognized by many to be the 

most significant and important document in history for 

establishing freedom and justice through democracy; 
2 

•HRES 734 EH 

Whereas the Constitution deserves the recognition, respect, 

and reverence of all people in the United States; 

Whereas every person in the United States should celebrate 

the freedom and responsibilities of the Constitution; 

Whereas the preservation of such values and rights in the 

hearts and minds of United States citizens would be advanced by official recognition of the signing of the Constitution; and 

Whereas September 17, 2009, is designated as ‘‘Constitution 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses support for the goals and ideals of 

‘‘Constitution Day’’; and 

(2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29547-29548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14678]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-256-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

June 5, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 31, 1996, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin) tendered for filing its Annual Gas 
Supply Realignment Reconciliation Filing pursuant to Subsection 39.3.3 
of General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1. More specifically, Williston Basin filed the following 
tariff sheets:

Second Revised Volume No. 1
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 15
Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 16
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 18


[[Page 29548]]


    Williston Basin has requested that the Commission accept this 
filing to become effective July 1, 1996.
    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets reflect the 
annual reconciliation of the latest GSR cost recovery period and the 
establishment of new reservation charge surcharges applicable to 
service under Rate Schedules FT-1 and ST-1 for the period July 1, 1996 
thru June 30, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in 
Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to the proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14678 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Troy Jack Briggs,

Petitioner,

v. 

Charles Ryan, et al.,

Respondents.

No. CV-18-00031-TUC-SHR

ORDER 

On July 9, 2020, Magistrate Judge Erik J. Markovich issued a Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he recommended the Court dismiss Petitioner Troy 

Jack Briggs’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). 

(Doc. 22.) The R&R notified the parties they had fourteen (14) days from the date of the 

R&R to file any objections. No objections have been filed.

If neither party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the 

District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified 

standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). However, the statute for 

review of a magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude further review by the 

district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. 

The Court has reviewed the Petition (Doc. 1), the Respondent’s Answer (Doc. 12), 

Petitioner’s Reply (Doc. 18), and Judge Markovich’s R&R (Doc. 22). The Court finds the 

R&R well-reasoned and agrees with Judge Markovich’s conclusions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

Case 4:18-cv-00031-SHR Document 24 Filed 08/24/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

72(b).

IT IS ORDERED the R&R is ADOPTED (Doc. 22) and Troy Jack Briggs’s 

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED and 

DISMISSED (Doc. 1). The Clerk of Court shall docket accordingly and close the case file 

in this matter.

Dated this 21st day of August, 2020.

Case 4:18-cv-00031-SHR Document 24 Filed 08/24/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32





COPSYNC, INC.





CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS


(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of COPsync, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.





Date: November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ RONALD A. WOESSNERRonald A. WoessnerChief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/ BARRY W. WILSONBarry W. WilsonChief Financial Officer





The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Gloria



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00561

- CV

Noe GARCIA and Iris Garcia,

Appellant s

v.

Gloria GARCIA

, Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 12

- 335

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Mo tion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s brief is due on November 4, 2014.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Antti William Uusiheimala, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Antti William UusiheimalaAntti
              William Uusiheimala
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              February
                13, 2008
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 2 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 3 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 4 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 5 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 6 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 7 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 8 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 9 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 10 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 11 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 12 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 13 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 14 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 15 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 16 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 17 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 18 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 19 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 20 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 21 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 22 of 23
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 23 of 23
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14600]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency has submitted the 
following proposed information collection to the Office of Management 
and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507).
    Title: National Defense Executive Reserve Personal Qualifications 
Statement.
    Type of Information Collection: Extension.
    OMB Number: 3067-0001.
    Abstract: The National Defense Executive Reserve (NDER) is a 
Federal Government program coordinated by the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency. The program provides a reserve of highly qualified 
individuals from industry, organized labor, professional groups, and 
academia to serve in executive positions in time of emergency. Such 
individuals must use FEMA Form 85-3, National Defense Executive Reserve 
Personal Qualifications Statement, to apply to the NDER program. FEMA 
uses the form to ensure that individuals are qualified to perform in 
assigned emergency positions and are eligible for membership in the 
Executive Reserve.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households.
    Number of Respondents: 100.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50.
    Frequency of Response: One-time.

COMMENTS: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on 
the proposed information collection to Victoria Wassmer, Desk Officer 
for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 
20503 within 30 days of the date of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the information collection should be made to Muriel B. 
Anderson, FEMA Information Collections Officer, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Room 311, Washington, DC 20472. 
Telephone number (202) 646-2625. FAX number (202) 646-3524.

    Dated: May 29, 1996.
Reginald Trujillo,
Director, Program Services Division, Operations Support Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-14600 Filed 6-07-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-P
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00314

- CV

SHANE CAIN

, Appellant

v.

TDCJ

- ID

, Appellee

From the 278th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 25,633

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Shane Cain has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it

would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

JusticeCain v. TDCJ

- ID Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

J ustice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 7, 2011

[CV06]
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Edward J. Geletka, President and Chief Executive Officer and L. Joseph Stella,
III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Colonial
Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his capacity as an officer of
the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and that:

(1)     the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.


November 10, 2005                       /s/ Edward J. Geletka
------------------                      ---------------------
Date                                    Edward J. Geletka,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


November 10, 2005                       /s/ L. Joseph Stella, III
------------------                      -------------------------
Date                                    L. Joseph Stella, III,
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Colonial Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Colonial
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5


<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         200570
<SECURITIES>                                   436510
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2003827
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (23000)
<INVENTORY>                                      19238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3259883
<PP&E>                                         5109618
<DEPRECIATION>                                (659448)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8495371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2826837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           276
<OTHER-SE>                                     3459834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8495371
<SALES>                                       15958229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              15958229
<CGS>                                          6148653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 10687507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 23000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              362688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1086674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (391610)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (695064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.28)


</TABLE>
#### Dennis GREENLEE, Claimant/Respondent, v. DUKES PLASTERING SERVICES and Insurance Company of North America, Employer/Appellants.

No. 69932.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 1, 1996.

Susan M. Kelly, St. Louis, for appellant.

Kenneth A. Leeds, Clayton, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer and Insurer appeal from the award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) finding them liable to Claimant for a permanent and total disability. We affirm. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this *475order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).