alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 99 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 691 

[Report No. 111–235] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2749) to amend the Federal 

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the safety of food in the 

global market, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2009 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2749) to amend 

the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve 

the safety of food in the global market, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 2749) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

4 Act to improve the safety of food in the global market, 

5 and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 

6 be dispensed with. All points of order against considerVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:26 Jul 29, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR691.RH HR691

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 691 RH 

1 ation of the bill are waived except those arising under 

2 clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. In lieu of the amendment in 

3 the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee 

4 on Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill, the 

5 amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the 

6 report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this reso7 lution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amend8 ed, shall be considered as read. All points of order against 

9 provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The pre10 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

11 as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 

12 except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and con13 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

14 the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one mo15 tion to recommit with or without instructions. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 99 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 691 

[Report No. 111–235] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2749) 

market, and for other purposes. Act to improve the safety of food in the global to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

JULY 29, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Case 2:17-cr-01538-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01538-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01538-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01538-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 4 of 4
----

| Name of Subsidiary           |   | State or Jurisdiction in whichIncorporated or Organized |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Domestic Subsidiaries        |   |                                                    |
| Support.com Gift Cards, Inc. |   | California                                              |
| SDC Software, Inc.           |   | Delaware                                                |
|                         |   |                                                    |
| Foreign Subsidiaries         |   |                                                    |
|                         |   |                                                    |
| SupportSoft Belgium BVBA     |   | Belgium                                                 |
| SDC Services Canada Inc.     |   | Canada                                                  |
| SupportSoft GmbH             |   | Germany                                                 |
| Support.com India Pvt Ltd    |   | India                                                   |
| Support.com Limited          |   | UK                                                      |
|                         |   |                                                    |

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Alief Vietnamese Alliance Church

, Relator

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 1 2 7

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 6

- 5 380 6

Trial court: 189 t h District Court o f Harris County

On February 2 1 , 201 8

, r elator, Alief Vietnamese Alliance Church , filed a petition

for writ of mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s September 8, 2017

“O rder Denying Defendant s ’ Second Plea to the Jurisdiction ,” and to compel respondent

to sign an order granting rel ator’s plea to the jurisdiction . Re lator has fil ed a swor n

record including the September 8, 2017 order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. 7 (a) (1)

. R elator ’s

petition included an affidavit of counsel, to comply with the Rule 52.3(j) certification

requirement, and relator’s counsel filed a separate a ffidavit of no testimony received at

hearing stating that there was no testimony received during any hearing in this matter

. See id. 52. 3(j), 52. 7(a)(2).

Accordingly, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by

any real party in interest. Se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 2.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be

filed within 2 0 days from the date of this order

. See id. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. K e yes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: M a rch 1 , 2018
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10659

Summary Calendar

MSW INVESTMENTS, A Texas

Joint Venture,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:95-CV-1537)

March 27, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

MSW Investments appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to vacate2 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq

.

3 R.M. Perez & Associates, Inc. v. Welch , 960 F.2d 534 (5th Cir. 1992).

4 E xxon Corp. v. Baton Rouge Oil and Chemical Workers Union , 77 F.3d 850 (5th

Cir. 1996).

5 McIlroy v. PainWebber, Inc. , 989 F.2d 817, 820 n.2 (5th Cir. 1993).

2 an arbitration award in a dispute about its right of first refusal on property owned

b y Chevron USA, Inc. MSW contends that the arbitrator’s decision is not

rationally inferable from the contract between it and Chevron and is based on a

manifest disregard of the law. Chevron responds that the Arbitration Act 2 provides

the sole basis for vacatur of an arbitration award. For the reasons assigned, we

affirm.

Sections 10 and 11 of the Federal Arbitration Act provide the only grounds on

which a reviewing court may vacate an arbitration award. 3 An award may not be

reconsidered based on alleged errors of fact or law or misinterpretation of the contract. 4

We have expressly “declined to adopt ‘manifest disregard,’ or any other standard, as

an addendum to [the Act].” 5 Thus, an arbitration award may not be vacated unless:

“(1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; ( 2) there is

evidence of partiality or corruption among the arbitrators; (3) the arbitrators were guilty

of misconduct which prejudiced the rights of one of the parties; or (4) the arbitrators6 Forsythe Int’l, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Co. of Texas

, 915 F.2d 1017, 1020 (5th Cir. 1990);

9 U.S.C. § 10.

3 exceeded their powers.” 6

MSW’s contention that the arbitration award is not rationally inferable from the

contract and is based on a manifest disregard of the law does not comport with any of

the grounds for attacking an award set forth in the Arbitration Act. Consequently,

MSW is not entitled to the relief it seeks. We affirm the confirmation of the arbitrator’s

award.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29557-29558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14765]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29558]]


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5518-2]


Request for Information Concerning the Development of NSPS 
Subpart Y (Coal Preparation Plants)

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently is 
reviewing whether coal dump truck unloading operations located at coal 
preparation plants are regulated as an effected facility under the 
Clean Air Act's New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), 40 CFR Part 
60, Subpart Y, and if not, whether coal unloading is, nevertheless, 
part of the coal preparation NSPS source category. These issues have 
arisen in the context of determining whether coal preparation plants 
are major sources under Title V of the Clean Air Act (as implemented by 
EPA regulations at 40 CFR Part 70) and, thus, must obtain a Title V 
operating permit.
    EPA has reviewed all of the relevant information in our files, 
including the background information used to develop the Subpart Y 
NSPS, the 1977 ``Inspection Manual for Coal Preparation Plants,'' as 
well as the NSPS review documents prepared for coal preparation plants 
in 1980 and 1988. From our analysis of the above sources, it appears 
that several relevant original documents or portions of the original 
documents upon which the NSPS were formed (e.g., attachments) are 
missing.
    The Agency is requesting assistance in locating or obtaining the 
following relevant documents/data related to the development of the 
Subpart Y NSPS to assist us in making a determination on the above 
mentioned issues: 1) reports upon which the NSPS were formed and which 
contain any actual opacity or visible emission testing data related to 
coal loading and unloading; 2) a document entitled ``Background 
Information for Establishment of National Standards of Performance for 
New Sources--Coal Cleaning Industry'' prepared for EPA by an EPA 
contractor; 3) analysis of State standards applied to coal loading and/
or unloading operations; and 4) any reference report(s) or information 
about the controlled emission points at a coal preparation plant 
prepared for EPA by Scott Research Laboratories, Incorporated.
    Information should be sent no later than July 11, 1996 to Dan 
Chadwick or Chris Oh (2223A), Office of Compliance, U.S. EPA, 401 M 
Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
Elaine G. Stanley,
Director, Office of Compliance.
[FR Doc. 96-14765 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51144, Inc., for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51144, Inc. hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.      SuchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended July 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of 51144, Inc. 

 
| Dated: September 12, 2005 |
|---------------------------|

 

**51144, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/  Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,474,488                 457,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,830                 597,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,687,229               7,449,481
<PP&E>                                      83,271,685              78,680,132
<DEPRECIATION>                            (59,511,084)              30,451,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,685,858              62,729,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       77,791,028               8,300,767
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       12,360,322              10,589,588
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,000                   1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (56,483,603)            (24,174,967)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,685,858              62,729,930
<SALES>                                     15,950,329              14,235,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,275,843              14,708,857
<CGS>                                        3,900,037               3,408,208
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,813,745              32,538,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,122,131               7,723,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (30,537,902)            (17,829,597)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (30,537,902)            (17,829,597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (30,537,902)            (17,829,597)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (358.52)                (208.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (358.52)                (208.36)
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0103

_________________ SKYLINE CONSULTING GROUP,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MORTENSEN WOODWORK, INC.,

Defendant and Appellee. O R D E R

___________

______ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause wa s classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court on August 17, 2022 . The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to th e Honorable Rienne H. M cElyea , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2022

09/30/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0103
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of J-Kan, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of J-Kan, Inc. for the period ended
September 30, 2008. The undersigned certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of J-Kan, Inc. as of
September 30, 2008. This Certification is executed as of
December 10, 2008. By: /s/ JERRY W. NEEL, JR. Jerry W. Neel, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  By: /s/ JERRY W. NEEL, JR. Jerry W. Neel, Jr. Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to J-Kan, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Wilson Shelby CAMDEN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47363.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 4, 1994.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from convictions for possession of a controlled substance, section 195.020, RSMo 1986 (now repealed), and for the possession of an explosive weapon, sections 320.136 and 571.020, RSMo 1986.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 27, 2015  /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of NovaRay Medical, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Marc C. Whyte, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: August 12, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Marc C. Whyte                    
|Marc C. Whyte Chief Executive
Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 5, 2019

Order 

Clerk

April 5, 2019

156189(65)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 156189

v COA: 332190

Saginaw CC: 15-041848-FC

TRAVIS TRAVON SAMMONS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for 

filing its supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as 

timely filed if submitted on or before April 19, 2019.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit 32.2

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2016 (the Report) of
PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat                
|Name: Aviv Efrat              
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 4, 2016
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 23, 2021 No. 04-21-00291-CV IN RE Kayla WALSER From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVOM-21-0000015 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than August 9, 2021. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. Relator’s motion for temporary relief is GRANTED, and we order that the trial court’s temporary orders are STAYED pending our disposition of relator’s petition. Furthermore, the mandamus record contains documents in which the full names of the children were not redacted as per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9. See id. R. 9.9(c). We therefore ORDER that the appendix is STRICKEN and ORDER relator to file an amended appendix, appropriately redacted, by July 28, 2021.

It is so ORDERED July 23, 2021. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT