alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David BergerDavid
      Berger
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                August
      5, 2009
<PAGE>
                                CANCELLATION AGREEMENT


     AGREEMENT dated this 4th day of March, 1998, by and between GIRBAUD 
DESIGN, INC., ("Licensor") a corporation organized and existing under the 
laws of the State of Delaware having its offices at: 411 East 50th Street, 
New York, NY 10023.

and

     I.C. ISSACS & COMPANY, L.P. ("Licensee"), a limited partnership organized 
and existing under the laws of Delaware having the offices at 3840 Bank 
Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21224-2522 and 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1029-New 
York, NY 10118.

     WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee have entered into a Trademark License and 
Technical Assistance Agreement (the "License Agreement") for Men's Jean wear 
and Casual wear dated November 1997.

1.  For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby 
acknowledged, the parties have agreed to cancel the License Agreement.

2.  This cancellation is effective as of January 15, 1998.


GIRBAUD DESIGN, INC.            I.C. ISAACS & COMPANY, L.P.

By: Francois Girbaud                 By: I.C., ISAACS & COMPANY, INC
   --------------------                    General Partner 
Name:
Title:
                                /s/ Robert J. Arnot
                                ---------------------------------
                                Name: Robert J. Arnot
                                Title: Chairman & Co-CEO


Date: March 4, 1998
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dwayne Fosseen, Chief Executive Officer of Mirenco, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
            December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
            on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
            of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Dwayne Fosseen
Dwayne Fosseen
Chief Executive Officer and President
April 15, 2005

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities and Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```
Case 4:18-cr-00260-JAS-DTF Document 1 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00260-JAS-DTF Document 1 Filed 02/21/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00260-JAS-DTF Document 1 Filed 02/21/18 Page 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

t1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145546

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145546

COA: 308288

St Joseph CC: 10

- 016317

- FH

MAJOR BENJAMIN BROUGHTON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







/s/ Aviv EfratAviv EfratAugust 3, 2011
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHAPRIA CHAPMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-03-20-HO) Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 20, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolph M. Lee, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Appellant Shapria Chapman pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm and one count of possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 922(k) and 924 (2000). He was sentenced to thirty months in prison. Chapman’s appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) raising two issues regarding Chapman’s sentence: (1) whether the district court properly increased his offense level by four because of the number of firearms involved in Chapman’s conduct; and (2) whether the district court erroneously enhanced Chapman’s offense level by two for being a manager of criminal conduct. The Government has elected not to file a brief. Chapman was notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief and has not done so. We have independently reviewed the entire record in this case, including the issues raised by counsel, and, in accordance with Anders , have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Chapman’s convictions and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from- 3 - representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13862]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies
    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than June 18, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Shari K. Jones, Rainsville, Alabama; to retain a total of 38 
percent of the voting shares of First State Bancshares of DeKalb 
County, Inc., Fort Payne, Alabama, and thereby indirectly retain shares 
of First State Bank of DeKalb County, Fort Payne, Alabama.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Anna Ruth Hasten and Simona Hasten, both of Indianapolis, 
Indiana; to each acquire a total of 45 percent of the voting shares of 
Hasten Bancshares, Indianapolis, Indiana, and thereby indirectly 
acquire First Bank & Trust Co., Sullivan, Indiana, and First National 
Bank, Kokomo, Indiana.
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 29, 1996.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-13862 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
**Exhibit 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement Nos.    333-41465,333-41467,333-74936,333-88611,333-91306,333-116274,333-116275,    and    333-74938,    each on    Form S-8,    of our reports dated February 17, 2006, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements of TriPath Imaging, Inc.,    TriPath Imaging, Inc. management’s assessment of the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and    the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting    of TriPath Imaging, Inc. included in the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of TriPath Imaging, Inc. for the year ended December 31,    2005. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Raleigh, NC    February 28, 2006
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 10 2000 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. FELIPE VEGA SUAREZ, also known as Gerardo Lopez-Guerrero,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-2244 (D.C. No. CR-99-17-HB) (D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , McKAY , and PORFILIO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

The defendant appeals the district court’s denial o f his request for a downward departure. We dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The defendant was convicted, following the entry of a guilty plea, of unlawful reentry of a deported alien. The defendan t moved for a downward departure arguing that his criminal history category over-represents the seriousness of his criminal history, see U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. The district court sentenced the defendant within the guideline range as set forth in the pre-sentence report. On appeal, the defendant recognizes that under the law in this circuit a defendant may not appeal the district court’s discr etionary refusal to grant a downward departure. See United States v. Fortier , 180 F.3d 1217, 1231 (10th Cir. 1999) (noting that it is settled law in this c ircuit and others that a district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward fr om the guidelines is not appealable). Rather, the defendant argues that this court shouldreconsider this position. However, a three-judge panel cannot disregard or ov errule circuit precedent. See United States v. Foster , 104 F.3d 1228, 1229 (10th Cir. 1997).-3-

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED . The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha Circuit Judge
H. Res. 50 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 13, 2009. 

Whereas Claiborne deBorda Pell was born on November 22, 

1918, in the State of New York; 

Whereas after receiving a degree in history from Princeton 

University in 1940 and a Master of the Arts degree from 

Columbia University in 1946, and after serving in the 

United States Coast Guard during World War II, Claiborne Pell continued his career in public service as part 

of the Foreign Service, serving in Czechoslovakia, Italy, 

and the District of Columbia; 

Whereas Claiborne Pell was elected to the Senate in 1960 by 

the people of the State of Rhode Island; 

Whereas in 1972, as a member of the Senate, Claiborne Pell 

was instrumental in creating the Basic Education Opportunity Grants; 

Whereas the Federal Pell Grants, renamed in honor of Claiborne Pell in 1980, have helped over 54,000,000 low- and 

middle-income students attend college and achieve their 

educational goals; 

Whereas during his time in the Senate, Claiborne Pell was 

a supporter of education, human rights, workers, international law and diplomacy, and the arts, sponsoring the 
2 

•HRES 50 EH 

legislation that created the National Endowment for the 

Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities; 

Whereas the High Speed Ground Transportation Act of 

1965, sponsored by Claiborne Pell, became the origin for 

the Amtrak system in the Northeast corridor; 

Whereas Claiborne Pell became Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1987, and an important 

voice in United States foreign policy and against international military conflict; 

Whereas after serving 6 terms in the Senate, Claiborne Pell 

retired in 1996; 

Whereas Claiborne Pell was appointed United States Delegate to the United Nations in 1997; 

Whereas on January 1, 2009, at the age of 90, Claiborne Pell 

passed away in Newport, Rhode Island: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the life, achievements, and distinguished 

career of Senator Claiborne Pell; 

(2) emphasizes that, among his legislative accomplishments, Senator Claiborne Pell changed the face of 

higher education by enabling millions of low- and middleincome students to achieve the dream of a college education; and 
3 

•HRES 50 EH 

(3) recognizes the Federal Pell grants, the educational grants that bear his name, as a significant part 

of the legacy of Senator Claiborne Pell. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13641]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-243-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 22, 1996, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2, the 
following tariff sheets proposed to be effective June 1, 1996:

Fifth Revised Volume No. 1

22 Revised Sheet No. 50
22 Revised Sheet No. 51
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 52
29 Revised Sheet No. 53
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 59
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 60
Third Revised Sheet No. 109
First Revised Sheet No. 110
Second Revised Sheet No. 111
Second Revised Sheet No. 124
First Revised Sheet No. 125
Third Revised Sheet No. 132
First Revised Sheet No. 133

Original Volume No. 2

149 Revised Sheet No. 1C
24 Revised Sheet No. 1C.a

    Northern states that this filing recognizes that the TCR Surcharge 
expires on May 31, 1996 and the GSR TI surcharge component applicable 
to TI volumes increases by the same amount pursuant to Section 21 and 
25 of the General Terms and Conditions of Northern's Tariff.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve to make Protestant a 
party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file 
a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13641 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 795 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 795

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 7, 2009.
Whereas, on September 11, 2001, the passengers and crew of United Flight 93 
        courageously gave their lives, thereby thwarting a planned attack on our 
        Nation's Capital;
Whereas the Flight 93 crash site is a profound national symbol of American 
        patriotism and spontaneous leadership of citizen heroes;
Whereas the people of Shanksville, Pennsylvania, came together as a community to 
        protect the sacred ground and construct a temporary memorial where 
        Flight 93 crashed on September 11th;
Whereas the Flight 93 Ambassadors, created by members of the Shanksville 
        community after the tragic events of September 11th, have exhibited 
        selfless dedication and leadership by preserving and recounting the 
        heroic story of the brave intervention of the passengers and crew 
        against the terrorists to the memorial's visitors; and
Whereas in large part due to the efforts of the community and Flight 93 
        Ambassadors, Congress authorized the creation of a permanent national 
        memorial as part of the National Park System under Public Law 107-226, 
        the Flight 93 National Memorial Act: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the Shanksville, Pennsylvania, community and Flight 93 
        Ambassadors for--
                    (A) their foresight, dedication, and leadership in 
                protecting the Flight 93 temporary memorial, the preservation 
                and sharing of the heroic story of the brave intervention of the 
                passengers and crew against terrorists; and
                    (B) their efforts to establish a permanent national memorial 
                to Flight 93; and
            (2) encourages the Secretary of the Interior and the National Park 
        Service to complete the Flight 93 National Memorial, as authorized by 
        the Flight 93 National Memorial Act, by the 10th anniversary of the 
        September 11th attacks.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NO. 07-03-0127 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANE L A MAY 20, 2003

______________________________ THE STATE OF TEXAS, APP ELLANT

V. KRISTOPHER COX, APPELL EE

_________________________________ FROM THE31 ST DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY; NO. 6053; HON ORABLESTEVE N R. EM MERT, J UDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPB ELL, JJ. MEM ORANDU M OPIN ION Appellant, The State of Tex as, by and through its District A ttorney, Richard J . Roach, filed a Motion to Dism iss Appeal on May 16, 2 003, stating that it desires to w ithd raw itsapp eal.2

W ithoutpassing on the m erits of the case, w e grant appellant’s m otion for volun tary dismissal an d h er eb y d i smi ss th e a pp ea l . T ex . R . A pp . P . 4 2. 2. Ha vi ng di smi sse d the appeal at appellant’s request, w e will not e ntertain a motion for rehearing, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Jam es T . C am pbe ll Justice
Do not publish.