alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DIVIX GOLF, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JEFFREY P. MOHR AND REMEDY GOLF, INC.,

Defendants,

AND

BANDWAGON, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

AND

DIANA SARCOZ AND FELIX HOANG,

Defendants.

______________________ 

2012-1235

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California in No. 05-CV-1488, Judge 

John A. Houston.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

DIVIX GOLF, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

Case: 12-1235 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 03/06/2014
2 DIVIX GOLF, INC. v. JEFFREY MOHR

v.

JEFFREY P. MOHR AND REMEDY GOLF, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants,

AND

BANDWAGON, INC.,

Defendant,

AND

DIANA SARCOZ AND FELIX HOANG,

Defendants.

______________________ 

2012-1236

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California in No. 05-CV-1488, Judge 

John A. Houston.

______________________ 

O R D E R

Pursuant to this court’s December 30, 2013 order, 

Bandwagon, Inc. (“Bandwagon”) and Divix Golf, Inc. 

(“Divix”) filed status reports indicating that Bandwagon 

and Divix have stipulated to dismissal of Bandwagon’s 

appeal (2012-1235). Jeffrey P. Mohr and Remedy Golf, 

Inc. have not filed status reports.

Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 12-1235 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 03/06/2014
 DIVIX GOLF, INC. v. JEFFREY MOHR 3

(1) 2012-1235 is dismissed. Each side shall bear its 

own costs in 2012-1235. 

(2) Absent a status report from Jeffrey P. Mohr and 

Remedy Golf, Inc. within 14 days of the date of this order, 

2012-1236 will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

 (3) The revised official caption in 2012-1236 has been 

reflected above. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 12-1235 Only): 

March 6, 2014

s30

Case: 12-1235 Document: 28 Page: 3 Filed: 03/06/2014
NUMBER 13-19-00069-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

CALLE NARANJO, LLC, Appellant,

v.

RAUL COSS BU AND CONSTRUCTORA 

COSS BU, S.A. DE C.V., Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 206th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant, Calle Naranjo, LLC, filed an accelerated appeal from an order entered 

by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-4616-15-D. 

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the appeal is 

now moot. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed 

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is 

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice

Delivered and filed the

30th day of May, 2019.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Roderick Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 2, 2018

 

 

*/s/ Rod Bartlett*

Roderick C. Bartlett

Chief Financial Officer 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. John Edward HIRE, Appellant.

No. WD 42132.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 27, 1990.

K. Louis Caskey, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and SHANGLER and TURNAGE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal following jury verdict and sentence of five years imprisonment for possession of more than 35 grams of marijuana and for having methamphetamine under his control, § 195.020, RSMo 1986, and sentence of 20 years imprisonment. The sentences were ordered to run concurrent.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1373]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00680]


Inland Steel Company, East Chicago, IN; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the 
Department of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance on December 1, 1995, applicable to all workers of 
Inland Steel Company located in East Chicago, Indiana. The notice will 
soon be published in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Findings show that only 
the workers involved in the production of carbon and high strength low 
alloy steel plates were the subject of the investigation. Accordingly, 
the Department is limiting its certification to only those workers at 
Inland Steel, East Chicago, Indiana engaged in the production of carbon 
and high strength low alloy steel plates.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include any and 
all workers affected by increased imports from Mexico, and separated as 
a result of the decline in sales or production of carbon and high 
strength low alloy steel plates produced at Inland Steel Company.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-00680 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Inland Steel Company, East Chicago, Indiana, 
engaged in employment related to the production of carbon and high 
strength low alloy steel plate who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after November 7, 1994 are eligible 
to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of December 1995.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-1373 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 32.2





NET TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 of Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Guillermo RodriguezGuillermo RodriguezChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date: May 16, 2011
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Andrew PHIPHUS, Defendant/Appellant. Andrew PHIPHUS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 63997, 65719.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 18, 1994.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions by a jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis on eleven criminal counts: one count of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986; one count of third degree assault, § 565.070, RSMo 1986; two counts of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1986; two counts of attempted first degree robbery, § 564.011, RSMo 1986; and five counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant as a prior offender to thirty years each on the first degree assault, first degree robberies and the corresponding armed criminal actions convictions; fifteen years on each attempted first degree robbery and the corresponding armed criminal actions; and one year on the third degree assault, the sentences all to run concurrently. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 MICHAEL SERNA, 2 Petitioner-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 32,135 4 NEW MEXICO TAXATION 5 AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 6 Respondent-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY 8 Thomas J. Hynes, District Judge 9 Michael Serna 10 Flora Vista, NM 11 Pro Se Appellee 12 Peter Breen 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 KENNEDY, Judge. 172 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

_______________________________ 6 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

___________________________ 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 10

___________________________ 11 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 12
* 

### Pursuant to 5 TH 

### C IR 

### . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH 

### C IR 

### . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40584 Summary Calendar
TRAVON M. JULY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (USDC No. 9:02-CV-322-RHC)

_______________________________________________________ 

### Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### We affirm the district court for the following reasons: 1. The ALJ’s determination that appellant is not disabled, reached under2 

### correct legal standards, is supported by substantial evidence. Carey v. Apfel , 230 F.3d 131, 135 (5th Cir. 2000). Appellant has failed to rebut the Commissioner’s evidence that he is capable of performing work existing in significant numbers in the national economy. Selders v. Sullivan , 914 F.2d 614, 618 (5th Cir. 1990). 2. Appellant has not established that, due to his attorney’s or the ALJ’s failure to develop the record, he suffered prejudice. Ripley v. Chater
. 67 F.3d 552, 557 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jun Wang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 16, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Jun WangJun
      WangChief
      Executive Officer
                (Principle Executive
      Officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00376-CV

Texas General Land Office and George P. Bush,

named in his Official Capacity as Texas Land Commissioner, Appellants

v.

City of Houston, Appellee

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-20-003520, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

On March 30, 2021, we extended the abatement of this appeal to June 15, 2021, at 

the parties’ request. We instructed the parties to file either a status report or motion to dismiss by 

June 15.

The parties have filed their Joint Status Report and Fifth Request for Extension of 

Abatement. In it, they represent that they have executed certain documents relating to settling 

their dispute and are waiting on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to 

approve Action Plan Amendment 8. The parties represent that they anticipate that the approval

will be had by or before June 20, 2021. The parties therefore seek an extension of the abatement 

of this appeal through and including July 15, 2021, and an order “that the Parties file an updated 

status report or an agreed dismissal on or before” that date.
2

The Court grants the parties’ request for a fifth abatement extension and extends 

the abatement through and including July 15, 2021, subject to any motion that may be made before 

that date to reinstate the appeal. The parties are ordered to file another status report, or a motion 

to dismiss, by July 15, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Kelly

Abated

Filed: June 24, 2021
#### Loretta M. NICHOLS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1273-91.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Feb. 3, 1993.

Kyle Hawthorne, Bryan, for appellant.

Bill Turner, Dist. Atty. and Margaret Lalk, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bryan, Robert Hut-tash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of theft and sentenced by the jury to four years confinement plus a $1,500 fine. Her conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. *Nichols v. State,*815 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1991).

In her sole ground for review, Appellant argues that the Court of Appeals incorrectly held that the trial court had authority to allow a juror to question a witness during trial. Since the Court of Appeals rendered its decision affirming Appellant’s conviction, this Court has held that the trial court errs when it allows jurors to propound questions to witnesses, and such error is not subject to a harm analysis. *Morrison v. State,*845 S.W.2d 882 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). The Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of our opinion in *Morrison.*Therefore, we will remand this case in light of that opinion.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of *Morrison.*
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney 

ANNA WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

State Bar No.: 029708 

405 West Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, Arizona 85701-5040 

Telephone: (520) 620-7300 

E-mail: anna.wright@usdoj.gov 

 nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

 Defendant.

18-CR-223-TUC-RCC (DTF) 

GOVERNMENT’S NOTICE OF FILING 

OF REDACTED EXHIBITS 

On July 11, 2019, the Court issued an Order regarding the Motion to Intervene by 

First Look Media for the Limited Purpose of Challenging Sealing of Records. Docs. 95, 

308. The Court indicated that, as requested by the intervenors, it would unseal the 

challenged materials and directed the government to submit any suggested further 

redactions to the materials within one week of the Order. Doc. 308. The government 

submitted the challenged materials in camera to the Court with its proposed redactions, 

and the Court accepted those redactions and ordered the government to file the redacted 

challenged materials. Doc. 312. 

The government hereby gives notice of the filing of the redacted challenged 

materials. The redacted challenged materials originally filed by the defendant as exhibits 

to his Motion to Suppress Evidence Found as a Result of Illegal Search (Doc. 53, Exhibits 

1-3) are submitted with this notice as Supplement 1. The redacted challenged materials 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313 Filed 07/19/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

originally filed by the defendant as exhibits to his Motion to Dismiss Indictment Due to 

Selective Enforcement (Doc. 186, Exhibits 1-3, 6, 9-13, 16-19) are submitted with this 

notice as Supplements 2 and 3.

 Respectfully submitted this 19th day of July, 2019. 

 MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney 

District of Arizona 

 /s/ Anna R. Wright & Nathaniel J. Walters

 ANNA WRIGHT &

 NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

 Assistant U.S. Attorneys 

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by 

other means this 19th day of July, 2019, to: 

All ECF participants 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313 Filed 07/19/19 Page 2 of 2
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 836 

Expressing support for Teen Read Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2009 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for Teen Read Week. 

Whereas 70 percent of 8th graders and 65 percent of 12th 

graders do not read at grade level; 

Whereas for many adolescent students, ongoing difficulties 

with reading and writing figure prominently into the decision to drop out of school; 

Whereas available data shows 85 percent of all juvenile offenders have reading problems and approximately onethird of all juvenile offenders read below the fourth-grade 

level; 

Whereas advanced literacy across content areas is the best 

available predictor of the ability of students to succeed in 

introductory college courses; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 836 IH 

Whereas research shows that teens who read for fun have 

better test scores and are more likely to succeed in the 

workforce; 

Whereas Teen Read Week encourages teens to read a book 

for leisure purposes; 

Whereas Teen Read Week recognizes that it is important for 

adolescents to read proficiently; and 

Whereas October 18 to October 24, 2009, is Teen Read 

Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Teen Read 

3 Week; 

4 (2) recognizes that it is important for teens to 

5 be taught to read proficiently; and 

6 (3) encourages teens to read for leisure and 

7 academic purposes. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn           
|Arthur H. Penn August 5,
2009