alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 815 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 815

Expressing support for recognition of Christopher Columbus and his role 
 in the history of the United States and recognizing the importance of 
   students learning about Christopher Columbus and the heritage and 
                         history of the Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2009

Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for recognition of Christopher Columbus and his role 
 in the history of the United States and recognizing the importance of 
   students learning about Christopher Columbus and the heritage and 
                         history of the Nation.

Whereas Columbus Day is celebrated the second Monday in October every year to 
        honor Christopher Columbus;
Whereas Christopher Columbus arrived in the Americas on October 12, 1492, and is 
        credited with initiating the European colonization of the Americas;
Whereas tributes and memorials to Christopher Columbus exist today in almost 
        every State in the Nation;
Whereas the discovery and colonization of the Americas is an integral part of 
        the history and heritage of the United States;
Whereas according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress in 2006, 
        less than half of the country's high school seniors had a basic 
        knowledge of United States history;
Whereas nearly half of the States in the Nation no longer require the teaching 
        of civics and United States history;
Whereas a proficient knowledge of the history and heritage of the United States 
        is important to promoting additional civic involvement; and
Whereas educating today's young people about the history and heritage of the 
        United States is essential to creating an informed generation of 
        citizens: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the recognition of Christopher Columbus and 
        his role in the discovery and history of the United States;
            (2) recognizes that it is important for young people to 
        learn about Christopher Columbus and the discovery, heritage, 
        and history of the Nation; and
            (3) encourages all people to take advantage of educational 
        opportunities to learn about Christopher Columbus' discovery of 
        the Americas and United States history.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              
|--------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat
|Aviv Efrat    
|May 7, 2008
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cornelius MORROW, Appellant.

No. WD 41980.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 13, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 24, 1990.

David S. Durbin, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Christine A. Alsop, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and SHANGLER and TURNAGE, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Morrow was convicted by a jury of one count of burglary in the first degree (§ 569.160, RSMo 1986)1 and two counts of forcible sodomy (§ 566.060). He received a five-year suspended sentence on the burglary count and two concurrent ten-*822year sentences on the sodomy counts. He now appeals, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction and that the trial court gave an erroneous “hammer” instruction to the jury.

The appeal is dismissed.

Following his convictions on July 25, 1988, Mr. Morrow was released on bond pending sentencing. On September 27, 1988, after he failed to appear at his sentencing hearing, a warrant was issued for his arrest. Mr. Morrow was arrested on March 30, 1989, and he was sentenced five weeks later. This appeal followed.

On appeal, the state argues that, by failing to appear at his sentencing and remaining at large for six months, Morrow has forfeited his right to appeal. In support of its argument, the state cites *State v. Wright,*763 S.W.2d 167 (Mo.App.1988). In *Wright,*the defendant was released on bond following her conviction for the possession of marijuana. She then failed to appear for sentencing and remained at large for five and one-half months. This court determined that she had forfeited her right to appeal, stating:

> Those who seek the protection of this legal system must ... be willing to abide by its rules and decisions. Ms. Wright comes before this court seeking vindication of her Fourth Amendment rights. Earlier, however, when she absconded she showed her reluctance to accept the decision of the trial court or to await the vindication of her rights by this court. She may not selectively abide by the decisions of the courts. *Wayne v. Wyrick,*646 F.2d 1268, 1271 (8th Cir.1981). By absconding, she has forfeited her right to appeal. *See also Molinaro v. New Jersey,*396 U.S. 365, 366, 90 S.Ct. 498, 499, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) (Escape “disentitles the defendant to call upon the resources of the Court for determination of his claims.”).

763 S.W.2d at 168-69. The rationale of *State v. Wright*is applied to this case.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

1

. All references to statutes are to Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1986, unless stated.
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 2 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 3 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 4 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 5 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 6 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 7 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 8 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 9 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 10 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 11 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 12 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 13 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 14 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 15 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 16 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 17 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 18 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 19 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 20 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 21 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 22 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 23 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 24 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 25 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 26 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 27 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 28 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 29 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 30 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 31 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 32 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 33 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 34 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 35 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 36 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 37 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 38 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 39 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 40 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 41 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 42 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 43 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 44 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 45 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 46 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 47 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 48 of 49
Case 4:18-cv-00124-JGZ Document 8-2 Filed 05/09/18 Page 49 of 49
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

October 22, 2018

Order 

Clerk

October 22, 2018

158567(36)

JORDEN CHANCE KULHANEK, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

SC: 158567

v COA: 341849 

Saginaw CC: 17-034163-NM

ALAN A. CRAWFORD and JOHN E. 

MELTON,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is 

DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable 

for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of 

the Court an initial partial filing fee of $122.00, which is 50 percent of his average monthly 

deposits for the past twelve months. Appellant must also submit a copy of this order with 

the payment and must refile the pleadings that are being returned with this order as

acknowledgement of his responsibility to pay the balance of the filing fee. Failure to 

comply with this order shall result in the appeal being administratively dismissed.

If plaintiff timely pays the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments 

shall be made to the Department of Corrections in the amount of 50 percent of the deposits 

made to appellant’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $253.00. That

amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8), appellant shall not file a new civil action or appeal 

with this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to appellant and return 

the appellant’s pleadings with this order.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Dann, 136 Ohio St.3d 1203, 2013-Ohio-2411.]

D ISCIPLINARY C OUNSEL v . D ANN . [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Dann, 136 Ohio St.3d 1203, 2013-Ohio-2411.] (No. 2011-2026

— Submitted June 7, 2013

— Decided June 11, 2013.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by res pondent, Marc Edward Dann, Attorney Registration No. 0039425, last known busin ess address in Cleveland, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court, coming now to consid er its order of November 20, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with th e provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this cour t that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Adam Cegielski, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Uranium Hunter
Corporation;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: May 13, 2008                  By:   /s/ Adam Cegielski
       ------------                        ------------------
                                           Adam Cegielski,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inregistration statements No. 333-117956 and 333-79391 on Forms S-8 of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 28, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hopfed Bancorp, Inc., and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which reportappears in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hopfed Bancorp, Inc. 

/s/ Rayburn, Bates &Fitzgerald, P.C. 

Brentwood, Tennessee 

Date: March 28, 2006
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 11

- 00075

- CV

GILBERTO RINCONES

v. WHM CUSTOM SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2009

- 04

- 2478

- I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, havin g considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be REVERSED AND REMANDED, IN PART, A ND AFFIRMED, IN PART . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED AND REMANDED, IN PART AND AFFIRMED, IN PART

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 50% against appellants and 50% against a ppell ees

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 12, 2015
6067195v1(67396.1)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lindsay G. Leavitt – 029110 

Lleavitt@jsslaw.com 

JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. 

A Professional Limited Liability Company 

One East Washington Street 

Suite 1900 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2554 

Telephone: (602) 262-5911 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum,

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HPT Suite Properties Trust, 

Defendant.

No. 2:18-cv-00388-DJH

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

 The Parties hereby give notice that a settlement in principle has been reached 

in this case that resolves all claims. The parties are in the process of finalizing the 

settlement documents and will file a Stipulated Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice 

upon completion of the settlement documentation. The parties request that the case 

be placed on the inactive calendar for 45 days to allow the parties to complete the 

settlement documents. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 30th day of April, 2018. 

JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. 

By: s/ Lindsay G. Leavitt 

Lindsay G. Leavitt 

One East Washington Street, Suite 1900 

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2554 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 

Case 2:18-cv-00388-DJH Document 15 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 2
6067195v1(67396.1)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on April 30, 2018, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing 

and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF 

registrants: 

Peter Strojnik 

ADA@strojnik.com

STROJNIK, P.C. 

2375 East Camelback Road, Ste. 600 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

 I hereby certify that on April 30, 2018, I served the attached document by mail 

on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF System: 

 s/ Tana Davis-Digeno 

Case 2:18-cv-00388-DJH Document 15 Filed 04/30/18 Page 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Aspire Japan, Inc., for the Quarter ending April 30, 2007 I, Ken Osako, Chief
      Financial Officer of Aspire Japan, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
Such
      amended
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The
      information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      period ended April 30, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Aspire Japan, Inc.




Dated:
                August 6, 2007






**Aspire
      Japan, Inc.**




By:
            */s/
                Ken Osako*
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Avicena Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Belinda Tsao NivaggioliName:

Belinda Tsao NivaggioliTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 20, 2008/s/ Michael J. SullivanName:

Michael J. SullivanTitle:

Acting Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 20, 2008


This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.