33054 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Proposed Rules

copy to Karl Simon or Dave Good at the

address listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl

Simon at the U.S. EPA, 401 M Street

S.W. (mail code 6405J), Washington

D.C., 20460, telephone (202) 233–9299;

or Dave Good at the U.S. EPA, 2565

Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, Michigan,

48105, telephone (313) 668–4450.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulated Entities

Entities potentially regulated by this

action are retailers and wholesale

purchaser-consumers of gasoline and

methanol which handle over 10,000

gallons of fuel per month, for the

purpose of refueling passenger cars and

light-duty trucks. Regulated entities

would include the following:

Category Examples of regulated entities

Industry ............................................................... Service station owners, service station managers, fleet managers who operate a refueling facility to refuel motor vehicles.

Federal Government ........................................... Federal facilities, including military bases, who operate a refueling facility to refuel motor vehicles.

State, Local and Tribal Governments ................. State, local and tribal governments who operate a refueling facilities to refuel motor vehicles.

This table is not intended to be

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide

for readers regarding entities likely to be

regulated by this action. This table lists

the types of entities that EPA is now

aware could potentially be regulated by

this action. Other types of entities not

listed in the table could also be

regulated. To determine whether your

facility is regulated by this action, you

should carefully examine the criteria

contained in § 80.22(j) of title 40 of the

Code of Federal Regulations, as

modified by today’s action. If you have

questions regarding the applicability of

this action to a particular entity, consult

one of the persons listed in the

preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section.

If no adverse comments are timely

received, no further activity is

contemplated in relation to this

proposed rule and the direct final rule

in the Final Rules section of this

Federal Register will automatically go

into effect on the date specified in that

rule. If adverse comments are timely

received on the direct final rule, the rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comment received on it will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. Because

the Agency will not institute a second

comment period on this proposed rule,

any parties interested in commenting

should do so during this comment

period.

For further supplemental information,

the detailed rationale, and the rule

revisions, see the information provided

in the direct final rule in the Final Rules

section of this Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedures,

Air pollution control, Gasoline, Motor

vehicle pollution.

Dated: June 12, 1996.

Carol M. Browner,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–16204 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP–300424; FRL–5368–7]

RIN 2070–AC18

Linuron; Proposed Revision of

Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA has completed the

reregistration process and issued a

Reregistration Eligibility Decision

document (RED) for the herbicide

linuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-

methoxy-1-methylurea). In the

reregistration process, all information to

support a pesticide’s continued

registration is reviewed for adequacy

and, when needed, supplemented with

new scientific studies. This proposed

action updates and corrects the

tolerance actions indicated in the RED.

Based on the RED, tolerance assessment

for linuron, and subsequent comments

and analyses, EPA is proposing to revise

food tolerance levels, revoke some

linuron tolerances, and to revise the

tolerance expression for residues of

linuron (40 CFR 180.184).

DATES: Written comments, identified by

the docket number [OPP–300424], must

be received on or before August 26,

1996.

ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written

comments to: Public Response and

Program Resources Branch, Field

Operations Division (7506C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring

comments to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921

Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.

Information submitted and any

comment(s) concerning this notice may

be claimed confidential by marking any

part or all of that information as

‘‘Confidential Business Information’’

(CBI). Information so marked will not be

disclosed except in accordance with

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

A copy of the comment(s) that does not

contain CBI must be submitted for

inclusion in the public record.

Information not marked confidential

may be disclosed publicly by EPA

without prior notice to the submitter.

Information on the proposed test and

any written comments will be available

for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the

Virginia address given above, from 8

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, excluding legal holidays.

Comments and data may also be

submitted electronically by sending

electronic mail (e-mail) to: oppdocket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic

comments must be submitted as an

ASCII file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Comments and data will also be

accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1

file format or ASCII file format. All

comments and data in electronic form

must be identified by the docket number

[OPP–300424]. No CBI should be

submitted through e-mail. Electronic

comments on this proposed rule may be

filed online at many Federal Depository

Libraries. Additional information on

electronic submissions can be found

below in this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Paul Parsons, Special Review and

Reregistration Division (7508W),

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. By

telephone: (703) 308–8037. Office

location: Special Review Branch, Crystal

Station #1, 3rd floor, 2800 Crystal Drive,

Arlington, VA 22202, e-mail:

parsons.paul@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Proposed Rules 33055

I. Legal Authorization

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

Act (FFDCA) [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.]

authorizes the establishment of

tolerances (maximum legal residue

levels) and exemptions from the

requirement of a tolerance for residues

of pesticide chemicals in or on raw

agricultural commodities pursuant to

section 408 [21 U.S.C. 346(a)]. Without

such tolerances or exemptions, a food

containing pesticide residues is

considered to be ‘‘adulterated’’ under

section 402 of the FFDCA, and hence

may not legally be moved in interstate

commerce [21 U.S.C. 342]. To establish

a tolerance or an exemption under

section 408 of the FFDCA, EPA must

make a finding that the promulgation of

the rule would ‘‘protect the public

health’’ [21 U.S.C. 346a(b)]. To establish

food additive regulations (FARs) to

cover pesticide residues in processed

foods under section 409 of FFDCA, EPA

must determine that the proposed use of

the food additive will be safe (21 U.S.C.

348). For a pesticide to be sold,

distributed, and used in the production

of food crops, animals, or processed

food, the pesticide must not only have

appropriate tolerances or FARs under

the FFDCA, but also must be registered

under the Federal Insecticide,

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA,

7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.). In 1988, Congress

amended FIFRA and required EPA to

review and reassess the potential

hazards arising from currently registered

uses of pesticides registered prior to

November 1, 1984. As part of this

process, the Agency must determine

whether a pesticide is eligible for

reregistration and if any subsequent

actions are required to fully attain

reregistration status. EPA has chosen to

include in the reregistration process a

reassessment of existing tolerances or

exemptions from the need for a

tolerance. Through this reassessment

process, EPA can determine whether a

tolerance must be amended, revoked, or

established, or whether an exemption

from the requirement of one or more

tolerances must be amended or is

necessary.

The procedure for establishing,

amending, or repealing tolerances or

exemptions from the requirement of

tolerances is set forth in the Code of

Federal Regulations at 40 CFR parts 177

through 180. The Administrator of EPA

or any person may initiate an action

proposing to establish, amend, revoke,

or exempt a tolerance for a pesticide

registered for food uses. Each petition or

request for a new tolerance, an

amendment to an existing tolerance, or

a new exemption from the requirement

of a tolerance must be accompanied by

a fee or a request for a waiver of such

fee. Current Agency policy on tolerance

actions arising from the reregistration

process is to administratively process

some actions without requiring payment

of a fee; this waiver of fees applies to

revisions or revocations of established

tolerances, and to proposed exemptions

from the requirement of a tolerance if

the proposed exemption requires the

concurrent revocation of an established

tolerance. Comments submitted in

response to the Agency’s published

proposals are reviewed; the Agency then

publishes its final determination

regarding the specific tolerance actions.

II. Regulatory Background and

Proposed Actions

A. Regulatory Background

The proposals described in this action

follow the Agency’s tolerance

reassessment that was completed and

included in the RED for linuron dated

March 1995. While the reassessment

determined that many tolerances

established for linuron are adequate and

supported by sufficient data, changes

are needed to other linuron tolerances

for various reasons, including:

increasing or decreasing tolerances

based on new data and revising

commodity terminology, crop group

designations, and definitions that are

not in accordance with the revised crop

group regulation (40 CFR part 180, 60

FR 26625, May 17, 1995) or with Table

II of Subdivision O of the Pesticide

Assessment Guidelines.

The section of the CFR to be amended

by this document is § 180.184.

B. Proposed Actions

1. Tolerance expression. The

tolerance expression under 40 CFR

§ 180.184 would be revised to:

‘‘Tolerances are established for the

combined residues of the herbicide

linuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-

methoxy-1- methylurea) and its

metabolites convertible to 3,4-

dichloraniline, calculated as

linuron....’’.

The food tolerances currently listed in

40 CFR 180.184(a) and (b) are for

residues of linuron per se. Plant and

animal metabolism studies indicate the

presence of unidentified metabolites of

linuron that are hydrolyzed to 3,4-

dichloroaniline (3,4-DCA) under the

enforcement analytical method. Since

the Agency believes in this case that the

metabolites converted to 3,4-DCA are

unlikely to be more toxic than the

parent compound, and since the

enforcement analytical method detects

compounds convertible to 3,4-DCA, it is

reasonable to express the tolerance as

the combined residues of linuron and its

metabolites convertible to 3,4-DCA.

Because of the very low levels of 3,4-

DCA found, the Agency has determined

that 3,4-DCA poses no greater than a

negligible risk in connection with the

registered use of linuron and it is not

necessary to regulate 3,4-DCA

separately.

Adequate enforcement methods are

available for the determination of

linuron residues of concern in/on plant

and animal tissues. The current

enforcement methods determine linuron

and all metabolites hydrolyzable to 3,4-

DCA.

2. Tolerance revocations. The Agency

proposes to revoke the tolerances for:

barley, forage; barley, grain; barley, hay;

barley, straw; corn, pop, fodder; corn,

pop, forage; oats, forage; oats, grain;

oats, hay; oats, straw; rye, forage; rye,

grain; rye, hay; and rye, straw. There are

no registered products for these uses,

and it is the Agency’s policy to revoke

tolerances in such cases.

In addition, the Agency proposes to

revoke the linuron tolerance for

parsnips, tops. This commodity is no

longer listed as a raw agricultural

commodity of parsnips, since it has

been determined to be an insignificant

feed item (see Table II of Subdivision O

of the Pesticide Assessment Guidelines).

3. Revisions to tolerances and food

and feed additive regulations. The

proposed increases and decreases in

linuron tolerances are based on new

data which indicate that a change is

needed in the tolerances. To determine

whether the proposed tolerance changes

are protective of the public health, EPA

considered all available health effects

data. Dietary exposure resulting from

the changes in this proposed action are

protective of the public health and do

not result in an unreasonable chronic or

acute risk.

The reference dose (RfD) is

established at 0.0077 mg/kg body

weight/day based on a no-observedeffect-level (NOEL) of 0.77 mg/kg body

weight/day for hematological changes

and is derived from a 1–year chronic

toxicity study in dogs. An uncertainty

factor of 100 was used to account for

interspecies extrapolation and

intraspecies variability. Chronic dietary

exposure to the general population with

existing and proposed tolerances utilize

only 2 percent of the RfD. For the two

subgroups with the highest exposures,

non-nursing infants less than 1 year old

and children 1 through 6 years, residues

are expected to utilize 6 percent and 4

percent of the RfD, respectively.

The acute dietary toxicological

endpoint is based on a NOEL of 25 mg/
33056 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Proposed Rules

kg body weight/day, derived from a

developmental toxicity study in rabbits.

Acute, high-end, exposure to women of

childbearing age (females 13 years of age

or older) results in a Margin of Exposure

(MOE) of 1,667 for developmental

toxicity. The Agency generally

considers an MOE of 100 adequate to

protect the public health. Thus, dietary

exposure to linuron is not expected to

result in an unreasonable acute effect.

The Agency considers that linuron

‘‘induces cancer’’ within the meaning of

section 409 of the FFDCA, based on a

dose-related increase in interstitial cell

hyperplasia and adenomas in a two–

year rat feeding study, and

hepatocellular tumors in a two–year

mouse feeding study. However, the

Agency believes that the weight of

evidence for the carcinogenic potential

of linuron in humans is weak and it

should not be regulated using a

linearized multi-stage risk assessment

model. Therefore, no quantitative

assessment of the dietary cancer risk has

been conducted for linuron; however,

such risk is considered to be negligible.

The following section describes the

proposed substantive changes in the

linuron tolerances for food or feed

additive regulations.

a. Field corn grain. EPA has reviewed

new data analyzed by a method with a

lower level of quantitation (0.05 ppm).

These data support a lower linuron

tolerance on field corn grain. The

Agency therefore proposes to lower the

linuron tolerance on field corn grain

from 0.25 ppm to 0.1 ppm.

b. Field corn fodder (stover). The

Agency proposes to increase the

tolerance on corn, field, fodder from 1

ppm to 6 ppm. A review of data based

on residue trials indicated the presence

of residues ranging from 0.1 to 5.5 ppm.

c. Livestock commodities. For meat,

fat, and meat byproducts of cattle, goats,

hogs, horses, and sheep, the established

tolerances are set at 1.0 ppm. Based on

its review of data on residues of linuron

in these commodities, which show that

residues in meat, fat, and meat

byproducts (except kidney and liver) are

at least an order of magnitude lower

than previously believed, the Agency

proposes to lower the current tolerances

for the meat, fat, and meat byproducts

(excluding liver and kidney) of cattle,

goats, hogs, horses, and sheep to 0.1

ppm, and to establish tolerances for the

liver and kidney of cattle, goats, hogs,

horses, and sheep at 1.0 ppm.

d. Potatoes. The Agency proposes to

reduce the tolerance on potatoes from 1

ppm to 0.2 ppm. Residue data submitted

to support reregistration of the potato

use support this reduction.

e. Wheat. EPA has reviewed new data

using an analytical method with a lower

level of quantitation (0.05 ppm). These

data support a lower linuron tolerance,

and therefore the Agency proposes to

lower the linuron tolerance on wheat

grain from 0.25 ppm to 0.1 ppm. The

Agency also proposes to raise the

linuron tolerance on wheat straw from

0.5 ppm to 2.0 ppm based on a

reassessment of residue data which

showed residues of up to 2 ppm on

wheat straw.

4. Changes from the RED—a. Food

additive regulations related to potatoes.

The RED stated that food and feed

additive regulation petitions (409

tolerances) would be required for

potatoes, granules; potatoes, chips; and

potatoes, waste from processing. As a

result of the revised Agency policy (60

FR 31300, June 14, 1995) or with Table

II of Subdivision O concerning when a

food or feed additive regulation is

needed, the Agency has re-examined its

decision in the Linuron RED on food or

feed additive regulations for potatorelated commodities. EPA has also

considered new data on residue levels

of linuron in potatoes submitted to

support reregistration. These data show

that residues of linuron in potato

processed commodities are unlikely to

exceed the section 408 tolerance.

Therefore, food or feed additive

regulations are not needed for these

commodities.

b. Sorghum. The tolerance for linuron

residues on sorghum grain should

remain at 0.25 ppm rather than be

lowered to 0.2 ppm as proposed in the

RED. Field studies show that residues

are close to the current tolerance level

of 0.25 ppm.

c. Wheat, hay, and corn, sweet,

fodder. In the RED, the Agency stated

that the linuron tolerances for wheat,

hay, and corn, sweet, fodder, should be

revoked, since these commodities were

no longer raw agricultural commodities.

However, these commodities are listed

as RACs in updated versions of Table II

of Subdivision O of the Pesticide

Assessment Guidelines. Consequently,

the Agency will not propose to revoke

the associated tolerances since these

tolerances are needed.

5. Reassessment of tolerances for uses

with outstanding data requirements. In

the RED, the Agency has required

additional studies to support

reassessment of tolerances for: corn,

field, grain; corn, field, fodder; corn,

field, forage; corn, sweet (K + CWHR);

corn, sweet, forage; sorghum, fodder;

sorghum, forage; soybeans, forage;

soybeans, hay; and wheat, forage. EPA

will reassess these tolerances once the

required data have been submitted and

reviewed. Two registrants for the cotton

use have requested voluntary

cancellation of this use, but other

registrants may support the use. If the

use is supported, the Agency will

require a processing study to support

reassessment of the tolerance for

cottonseed; if the use is not supported,

the Agency will propose to revoke the

cottonseed tolerance. In addition, data

to support establishing a tolerance for

aspirated grain fractions for field corn

are outstanding; and data are needed to

support tolerances for corn, sweet,

stover and wheat, hay.

6. Revising commodity definitions.

Current linuron tolerances include

commodity terminology, Crop Group

designations, or definitions that are not

in accordance with the revised Crop

Group Regulation (40 CFR part 180, 60

FR 26625, May 17, 1995) or with Table

II of Subdivision O of the Pesticide

Assessment Guidelines. Most of these

changes are slight, and not likely to

result in any confusion; the exception is

corn fodder, which has been changed to

corn stover for both field and sweet

corn. The amendments at the end of this

notice show all changes in commodity

terminology.

III. Public Comment Procedures

EPA invites interested persons to

submit written comments, information,

or data in response to this proposed

rule. Comments must be submitted by

August 26. 1996. Comments must bear

a notation indicating the document

control number. Three copies of the

comments should be submitted to either

location listed under ADDRESSES.

Any person who has registered or

submitted an application for registration

of a pesticide, under the Federal

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide

Act (FIFRA) as amended, which

contains any of the ingredients listed

herein, may request within 30 days after

publication of this proposed rule in the

Federal Register that this rulemaking

proposal be referred to an Advisory

Committee in accordance with section

408(e) of the FFDCA.

A record has been established for this

rulemaking under docket number [OPP–

300424] (including comments and data

submitted electronically as described

below). A public version of this record,

including printed, paper versions of

electronic comments, which does not

include any information claimed as CBI,

is available for inspection from 8 a.m. to

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The public

record is located in Room 1132 of the

Public Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operations Division

(7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Proposed Rules 33057

Environmental Protection Agency,

Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA.

Electronic comments can be sent

directly to EPA at:

opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov

Electronic comments must be

submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the

use of special characters and any form

of encryption.

The official record for this

rulemaking, as well as the public

version, as described above will be kept

in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will

transfer all comments received

electronically into printed, paper form

as they are received and will place the

paper copies in the official rulemaking

record which will also include all

comments submitted directly in writing.

The official rulemaking record is the

paper record maintained at the address

in ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ at the beginning of

this document.

IV. Regulatory Assessment

Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), the Agency

must determine whether the regulatory

action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore

subject to review by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) and the

requirements of the Executive Order.

Under section 3(f), the order defines a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as an

action that is likely to result in a rule:

(1) having an annual effect on the

economy of $100 million or more, or

adversely and materially affecting a

sector of the economy, productivity,

competition, jobs, the environment,

public health or safety, or State, local or

tribal governments or communities (also

referred to as ‘‘economically

significant’’); (2) creating serious

inconsistency or otherwise interfering

with an action taken or planned by

another agency; (3) materially altering

the budgetary impacts of entitlements,

grants, user fees, or loan programs or the

rights and obligations of recipients

thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or

policy issues arising out of legal

mandates, the President’s priorities, or

the principles set forth in this Executive

Order. Pursuant to the terms of this

Executive Order, it has been determined

that this rule is not a ‘‘significant

regulatory action,’’ because it does not

meet any of the regulatory-significance

criteria listed above.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

This proposed rule has been reviewed

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of

1980 [Pub. L. 96–354; 94 Stat. 1164, 5

U.S.C. 601 et seq.] and EPA has

determined that it will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small businesses,

small governments, or small

organizations.

Accordingly, I certify that this

proposed rule does not require a

separate regulatory flexibility analysis

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

This proposed regulatory action does

not contain any information collection

requirements subject to review by OMB

under the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

This action does not impose any

enforceable duty, or contain any

‘‘unfunded mandates’’ as described in

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), or

require prior consultation as specified

by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093,

October 28, 1993), entitled Enhancing

the Intergovernmental Partnership, or

special consideration as required by

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,

February 16, 1994).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Administrative practice and

procedure, Agricultural commodities,

Pesticides and pests, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: June 11, 1996.

Lois Rossi,

Director, Special Review and Reregistration

Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR, chapter I, part 180

is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

2. Section 180.184 is revised to read

as follows:

§ 180.184 Linuron, tolerances for residues.

(a) Tolerances are established for the

residues of the combined residues of the

herbicide linuron (3-(3,4-

dichlorophenyl)- 1-methoxy-1-

methylurea) and its metabolites

convertible to 3,4- dichloroaniline,

calculated as linuron, in or on the

following raw agricultural commodities:

Commodity Parts per

million

Asparagus ................................. 7

Commodity Parts per

million

Carrot ........................................ 1

Cattle, fat .................................. 0.1

Cattle, kidney ............................ 1

Cattle, liver ................................ 1

Cattle, meat .............................. 0.1

Cattle, mbyp (except liver and

kidney) ................................... 0.1

Celery ........................................ 0.5

Corn, field, forage ..................... 0.1

Corn, field, grain ....................... 0.1

Corn, field, stover ..................... 6

Corn, sweet (K+CWHR) ........... 0.25

Corn, sweet, forage .................. 1

Corn, sweet, stover ................... 1

Cottonseed ................................ 0.75

Goats, fat .................................. 0.1

Goats, kidney ............................ 1

Goats, liver ................................ 1

Goats, meat .............................. 0.1

Goats, mbyp (except liver and

kidney) ................................... 0.1

Hogs, fat ................................... 0.1

Hogs, kidney ............................. 1

Hogs, liver ................................. 1

Hogs, meat ............................... 0.1

Hogs, mbyp (except liver and

kidney) ................................... 0.1

Horses, fat ................................ 0.1

Horses, kidney .......................... 1

Horses, liver .............................. 1

Horses, meat ............................ 0.1

Horses, mbyp (except liver and

kidney) ................................... 0.1

Parsnips, roots .......................... 0.5

Potatoes .................................... 0.2

Sheep, fat ................................. 0.1

Sheep, kidney ........................... 1

Sheep, liver ............................... 1

Sheep, meat ............................. 0.1

Sheep, mbyp (except liver and

kidney) ................................... 0.1

Sorghum, fodder ....................... 1

Sorghum, forage ....................... 1

Sorghum, grain ......................... 0.25

Soybeans .................................. 1

Soybeans, forage ...................... 1

Soybeans, hay .......................... 1

Wheat, forage ........................... 0.5

Wheat, grain ............................. 0.1

Wheat, hay ................................ 0.5

Wheat, straw ............................. 2.0

(b) Tolerances with regional

registration, as defined in § 180.1(n) are

established for the residues of the

combined residues of the herbicide

linuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-

methoxy-1- methylurea) and its

metabolites convertible to 3,4-

dichloroaniline, calculated as linuron,

in or on the following raw agricultural

commodities:

Commodity Parts per

million

Parsley ...................................... 0.25

[FR Doc. 96–15597 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F