alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 31, 2005

|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/ Billy C. Duvall                     
|Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be
deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5974 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to install new permanent fencing around 

the United States Capitol, any of the Capitol Buildings, or any portion 

of the Capitol Grounds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to install new permanent fencing around the United States Capitol, any of 

the Capitol Buildings, or any portion of the Capitol 

Grounds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Fencing at the 

5 United States Capitol Complex Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5974 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF FUNDS FOR NEW PERMA2 NENT FENCING AROUND UNITED STATES 

3 CAPITOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—No Federal funds may be used 

5 to install new permanent fencing around— 

6 (1) the perimeter of any of the Capitol Build7 ings described in section 5101 of title 40, United 

8 States Code; or 

9 (2) the perimeter of the United States Capitol 

10 Grounds, or any portion thereof, described in section 

11 5102 of such title. 

12 (b) REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING FENC13 ING.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to pro14 hibit the repair or replacement of fencing that was in ex15 istence on the date of enactment of this Act around an 

16 area described in subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1201

_____________________________

JOHN VENN, JR., as trustee for 

the Estate of Lisa Buckley,

Appellant,

v.

BAY DISTRICT SCHOOLS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Allen L. Register, Judge.

November 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marie A. Mattox of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

Appellant.

J. Cole Davis and Julia Kathleen Claypool of Hand Arendall

Harrison Sale, Panama City, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Louis Vucci, Jr., Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|  

 

 

 

Dated: February 4, 2011

/s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.

Louis Vucci, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Victor Petrone, Chief Financial Officer of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

 

 

 

Dated: February 4, 2011

 

/s/ Victor Petrone

Victor Petrone

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer 

and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 837 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 837

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 21, 2009.
Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College was founded in 1858;
Whereas the first commencement held at Kentucky Wesleyan College was in 1868;
Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College is a private, liberal arts Methodist college 
        located in Owensboro, Kentucky;
Whereas 956 students from 27 States and 6 foreign countries were enrolled at 
        Kentucky Wesleyan College in the fall of 2008;
Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College's mission statement is to foster a liberal 
        arts education that nourishes, stimulates, and prepares future leaders 
        intellectually, spiritually, and physically to achieve success in life;
Whereas Kentucky Wesleyan College has a number of notable alumni, including a 
        United States Supreme Court justice, a Major League Baseball pitcher, 
        and the founder of another Kentucky institution of higher education;
Whereas the Kentucky Wesleyan Panthers compete in National Collegiate Athletic 
        Association Division II athletics; and
Whereas from overseas mission trips to numerous local projects, Kentucky 
        Wesleyan students meet the needs of others and positively impact the 
        world around them: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Kentucky Wesleyan College for over 150 years of 
        service as an institution of higher education; and
            (2) thanks Kentucky Wesleyan College for the valuable education it 
        has provided to students.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### McCarthy, executrix, *v.*McGee *et al.*

Atkinson, J.

In item 2 of a will it was provided: “ I desire and direct that all my just debts be paid, without unnecessary delay, by my executor hereinafter named and appointed.” In item 1 of a codicil to the will it was provided: “I give, bequeath, and devise to my beloved sister, Miss Carrie N. McCarthy, all the real estate wherever situated, of which I die possessed, for and during her natural life; and at her death, I give, bequeath, and devise said real estate to Joseph S. McGee and his wife, Lilly Kelsey McGee, for and during their natural lives; and at their deaths, to the children of Joseph S. McGee and Lilly McGee, share and share alike. However, during the life of my said sister, Miss Carrie H. McCarthy, she is to have one half of the income from said real estate, and the other half of said income is to go jointly to the said Joseph S, McGee and his wife, Lilly Kelsey McGee.” In item 2 of the codicil it was provided: “I give, bequeath, and devise all the cash that I may be possessed of at my death, after the payment of all my just debts and funeral expenses, to my beloved cousin, Lena Kelsey.” In item 3 of the codicil it was provided: “I *766give, bequeath, and devise all the remainder of the personal property of which I may die possessed, to Joseph S. McGee and his wife, Lilly Kelsey McGee.” The testator at the date of his death had one hundred dollars in money and certain cotton, and owed specified debts, which exceeded the amount of the cash on hand and were less than the amount for which the cotton was sold. The executor instituted a suit for direction as to whether .the debts of the testator constituted a charge upon the bequest to Lena Kelsey, as provided in item 2 of the codicil, and what disposition should be made of the balance of the money arising from the sale of the cotton remaining after payment of the funeral expenses and debts of the testator. The case was submitted to the judge for decision without a jury. Reid: The court properly ruled that the cash 'devised in item 2 of the codicil was chargeable with the payment of the debts, and that under item 3 of the codicil Joseph S. McGee and his wife were entitled to the money on hand arising from the sale of the cotton.

No. 3200.

January 17, 1923.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Malcolm D. Jones. Bibb • superior court. February *28, 1922.*

*B. L. Berner, Walter DeFore,*and *James G. Estes,*for plaintiff in error.

*Charles Alter man,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
H. Res. 723 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 9, 2009. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he 

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Luetkemeyer. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney 

ANNA WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

State Bar No.: 029708 

405 West Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, Arizona 85701-5040 

Telephone: (520) 620-7300 

E-mail: anna.wright@usdoj.gov 

 nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

 Defendant.

18-CR-223-TUC-RCC (DTF) 

GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST 

FOR DISCLOSURE 

(Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b))

Now comes the United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, 

and hereby states that the defendant has requested disclosure under Fed. R. Crim. P. 

16(a)(1), and that the government has complied with these requests and acknowledges its 

continuing duty to disclose. 

Wherefore, the United States of America hereby requests pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. 

P. 16(b), that the defendant provide the government with the following: 

 1. Documents and Tangible Objects. Permit the government to inspect and copy 

or photograph all books, papers, documents, photographs, tangible objects, or copies or 

portions thereof, which are within the possession, custody, or control of the defendant and 

which the defendant intends to introduce as evidence in chief at the trial. Fed. R. Crim. P. 

16(b)(1)(A). 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. Reports of Examinations and Tests. Permit the government to inspect and 

copy or photograph any results or reports of physical or mental examinations and of 

scientific tests or experiments made in connection with the particular case, or copies 

thereof, within the possession or control of the defendant, which the defendant intends to 

introduce as evidence in chief at the trial or which were prepared by a witness whom the 

defendant intends to call at the trial when the results or reports relate to that witness’ 

testimony. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(B). 

 3. Expert Witnesses. Disclosure of a written summary of testimony the 

defendant intends to use under Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703 and 705 at trial. This summary must 

describe the opinions of the witnesses, the bases and reasons therefore, and the witnesses’ 

qualifications. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C). 

 4. Continuing Duty to Disclose. Prompt notification of the existence of 

additional evidence or material that is subject to discovery or inspection under Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 16, up to or during trial. 

 Respectfully submitted this 10th day of May, 2019. 

 

 MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney 

District of Arizona 

 /s/ Anna R. Wright & Nathaniel J. Walters

 ANNA WRIGHT &

 NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

 Assistant U.S. Attorneys 

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by 

other means this 10th day of May, 2019, to: 

All ECF participants
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Johnny S. THOMAS, Defendant/Appellant, Johnny S. THOMAS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 61310, 62972 and 63050.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 21, 1993.

Raymond L. Legg, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and *926armed criminal action § 571.015, RSMo 1986. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior, persistent and class X offender to twenty-two years imprisonment for first degree assault and twenty-two years imprisonment for armed criminal action. The sentences were to run concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 80.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14998]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than June 27, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Christopher J. McCurdy, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045:
    1. Robert H. Abplanalp Irrevocable Retained Annuity Trust, 
Bronxville, New York; to acquire a total of 16.3 percent of the voting 
shares of Hudson Valley Holdings Corp., Yonkers, New York, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Hudson Valley Bank, Yonkers, New York.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 7, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-14998 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit No. 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: November 26, 2007
|                       
|/s/ John E. Peck       
|John E. Peck           
|Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 15, 2006
    /s/ Leonard M. AnthonyLeonard M. AnthonyExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer Page 35 of 35
f8kprwt021709tarpfinal.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing










EXHIBIT 10.1




WAIVER




In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I
hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register
on October 20, 2008.


I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called
“golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase
Program.


This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation
a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment
relationship.


________________________________, 2009                                   
___________________________

UST Seq. Number 562
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





EXHIBIT 10.55


ADDENDUM


This addendum sets forth the timing of the terms of the Swiss employment
contract between Aart Brouwer and Celgene Management Sàrl.


While the effective date of the contract is November 1, 2008, to ensure
continuous service under Swiss law, the cash compensation terms outlined will be effective January 1, 2009,
commensurate with your change in responsibility and appointment to Senior Advisor to the Chairman & CEO and
Chairman, International.


In accordance with this, your 2009 stock option grant is effective in April,
2009 when the 2009 stock option cycle begins.

	 	 	 
	/s/ Aart
Brouwer 

	 	/s/ Sol
J. Barer 


	A. BROUWER 	 	S. BARER 







 








 





ADDENDUM SUPPLEMENT


I hereby agree that
Celgene International Sarl assigns and transfers my employment
contract to Celgene Management Sarl effective as of the date of the
new contract 11/1/08.

	 	 	 
	/s/ Aart
Brouwer 

	 	17 Feb 09 


	Aart Brouwer	 	Date
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30830

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEVEN B. TENCER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-570-C

- - - - - - - - - -

October 19, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Court-appointed counsel for Steven B. Tencer has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.