alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6829

STANLEY ROBIN FURR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MEDICAL STAFF, NCDOC Medical Staff at Columbus Correctional Center; CATHARINE KAPOR; CHARLES STEWART; PATRICK CAMPBELL, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-00-39-5-F3) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 31, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Robin Furr, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Stanley Robin Furr appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Furr v. Medical Staff , No. CA-00-39-5-F3 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Harry TETTAMBLE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Paul CASPARI and Barbara Smith, Respondents.

No. 66288.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Jan. 31, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 7, 1995.

Harry Tettamble, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munich, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Joseph S. Lawder, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondents.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In this action for declaratory relief, petitioner Harry Tettamble appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, prison officials where petitioner is incarcerated. Petitioner alleged that respondents are denying him good time credit under § 558.041 RSMo in a manner which violates his due process rights and which is an ex post facto violation. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15343]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 13 and 14 June 1996.
    Time of Meeting: 0900-1600 (both days).
    Place: Pentagon--Washington, DC.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board (ASB) Ad Hoc Study on ``The 
Impact of Information Warfare on Army C4I Systems'' will meet for 
report writing sessions. These meetings will be closed to the public 
in accordance with Section 552b(c) of title 5, U.S.C., specifically 
subparagraph (4) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 2, 
subsection 10(d). The proprietary matters to be discussed are so 
inextricably intertwined so as to preclude opening any portion of 
this meeting. For further information, please contact Michelle Diaz 
at (703) 695-0781.
Michelle P. Diaz,
Acting Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 96-15343 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
| 1.   | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Patrick Sheaffer                 | /s/ Kevin J. Lycklama                |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Patrick Sheaffer                | Kevin J. Lycklama               |
| Chief Executive Officer         | Chief Financial Officer         |
|                                 |                                 |
| Dated:  June 2, 2011  | Dated:  June 2, 2011  |

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation of our report dated April 1, 2002,
on the financial statements of Maxxon, Inc. (the "Company") at December 31,
2001, for the period from inception (August 16, 1996) to December 31, 2001, and
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, included in this Form 10-KSB
Annual Report of Maxxon, Inc. as of December 31, 2001.


/s/ Sutton  Robinson Freeman & Co., P. C.
Certified Public Accountants
Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 1, 2002
EXHIBIT 32





DUSSAULT APPAREL INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dussault Apparel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason Dussault, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: September19, 2012
By:
/s/Jason DussaultName:
Jason DussaultTitle:
Principal Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00285-CR

Michael TALMADGE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10180

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 22, 2016

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellant Michael Talmadge pled no contest to possession of less than one gram of 

methamphetamine. On April 15, 2014, Appellant’s adjudication of guilt was deferred and he was 

placed on community supervision. On April 14, 2015, and February 9, 2016, the trial court 

amended Appellant’s community supervision conditions. Appellant now seeks to appeal from the 

trial court’s February 9, 2016 order modifying the conditions of his deferred adjudication. 

On May 9, 2016, we notified Appellant that “an order modifying the terms or conditions 

of deferred adjudication is not in itself appealable.” Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. 
04-16-00285-CR

- 2 -

Crim. App. 2006) (citing Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977)). We ordered 

Appellant to show cause in writing why his appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

To date, no response has been filed. 

Because the order modifying the terms of Appellant’s deferred adjudication is not an 

appealable order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Davis, 195 S.W.3d at 711.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICES

SUE WALKER

BILL MEIER

LEE GABRIEL

ELIZABETH KERR

MARK T. PITTMAN

J. WADE BIRDWELL TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FO RT WORTH, TEXAS 76196

- 0211

TEL: (817) 884

- 1900

FAX: (817) 884

- 1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

CLARISSA HODGES

May 24, 2018

Hon. David L. Evans

Regiona l Presiding Judge

Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building

100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

David A. Pearson, IV

Lakeside Plaza

8401 Jacksboro Highway, Ste. 307

Fort Worth, TX 76135

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Joseph W. S pence

Assistant District Attorney

401 W. Belknap Street

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Louis E. Sturns

Judge, 213th District Court

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 West Belknap

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Crimin al District Clerk, Tarrant County

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap, 3rd Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

- 0402

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02

- 17

- 00356

- CR, 02

- 17

- 00357

- CR

Trial Court Case Number: 1354634D, 1501697D

Sty le: Brandon Mitchell

v.

The State of Texas

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the

above

- referenced cause. Copies of t he opinion and judgment are attached and can

also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

.

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK
#### John Leon LONG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 09-89-068-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Aug. 30, 1989.

Philip W. Swisher, Conroe, for appellant.

David Bluestein, Conroe, for State.

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant filed the application alleging a plea of former conviction and/or double jeopardy.

Appellant was arrested on July 2, 1988, for driving while license suspended (DWLS) and driving while intoxicated (DWI). On July 6, 1988, he pleaded guilty to the DWLS charge. On October 6, 1988, he was indicted for DWI with allegations of prior convictions. Appellant is the same individual involved in both prosecutions and both occurred at the same time. Thus, appellant claims the second prosecution is barred. We disagree.

This case is the converse of *Rakestraw v. State,*765 S.W.2d 873 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, pet. ref’d). In *Rakes-traw,*the defendant pleaded guilty to DWI and then sought to bar the state from prosecuting him for DWLS. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals concluded that while both offenses had a common element of driving on a public highway, the other elements were sufficiently distinguishable. In *Naquin v. State,*725 S.W.2d 447 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1987, no pet.), this court held that a conviction for driving on the wrong side of the road did not bar a prosecution for DWI. *See also Gehrke v. State,*507 S.W.2d 550 (Tex.Crim.App.1974), where a conviction for failure to keep a vehicle in *746a marked lane did not bar a subsequent prosecution for DWI. Appellant presents no precedent to convince us to deviate from the above line of cases. The trial court’s denial of the writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7240

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS
,

Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Governor; BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, Lieutenant Governor; JOHN DOE, Chief of Security; JOHN DOE, Major; CAPTAIN WALTER ISER; LIEUTENANT THOMAS SAWYERS; LIEUTENANT VAUGHN WHITEMAN; ROBERT L. GREEN, Secretary; JOHN DOE, Assistant Warden; SERGEANT APRIL CARR; ICKES, Correctional Officer; JESSE RITCHEY, Correctional Officer II; JASON ELKINS, Correctional Officer II; RICHARD RODERICK, Correctional Case Management Manager; JOHN G. SINDY, Correctional Case Management Specialist; S. JOHNSON, Case Management Special ist; F. TODD TAYLOR, Executive Director; JEFF NINES, Warden; FRANK BISHOP; STEPHEN T. MOYER
,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. ( 8:20

- cv

- 00432

- DKC )

Submitted : January 26, 2022 Decided: February 9, 2022

Before AGEE and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Albert Curtis Mills
, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Albert Curtis Mills appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motions to

dismiss Mills’ complaint . We have reviewed the record and find no rever sible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mills v. Md. Dep’t of

Pub. Safety , No. 8:20

- cv

- 00432

- DKC (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14805]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, June 20, 1996--2:00 p.m.

PLACE: Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 
1801 ``L'' Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20507.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes.
    2. Panel Presentation by Invited Experts on Employment 
Discrimination Issues Affecting Older Americans.

    Note: Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over 
to a later meeting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC 
Commission meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also 
provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future 
Commission sessions.) Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and 
(202) 663-4074 (TTD) at any time for information on these meetings.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Frances M. Hart, Executive Officer 
on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: June 6, 1996.
Frances M. Hart,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 96-14805 Filed 6-6-96; 3:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 6750-06-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Thomas Trajvon Keyonte Hardin,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00296-01-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER

On July 26, 2021, Defendant appeared before this Court on a superseding petition 

for revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. 

The Court considered the superseding petition and file in determining whether Defendant 

should be released on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a superseding 

petition to revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if 

released pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 

and 18 U.S.C. § 3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 26th day of July, 2021.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00296-JJT Document 70 Filed 07/26/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32





DUSSAULT APPAREL INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dussault Apparel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Mintak, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  September 19, 2012
By:
/s/Robert MintakName:
Robert MintakTitle:
Principal Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 700 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 700

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 7, 2009.
Whereas all children and youth learn best when they are healthy, supported, and 
        receive an education that meets their individual needs;
Whereas schools can more effectively ensure that all students are ready and able 
        to learn if they work to meet the needs of each student;
Whereas sound psychological principles are critical to proper instruction and 
        learning, social and emotional development, prevention and early 
        intervention in a culturally diverse student population;
Whereas school psychologists are specially trained to deliver mental health 
        services and academic support that lowers barriers to learning and 
        allows teachers to teach more effectively;
Whereas school psychologists facilitate collaboration that helps parents and 
        educators identify and reduce risk factors, promote protective factors, 
        create safe schools, and access community resources;
Whereas school psychologists are trained to assess barriers to learning, utilize 
        data-based decisionmaking, implement research-driven prevention and 
        intervention strategies, evaluate outcomes, and improve accountability;
Whereas State educational agencies and other State entities credential more than 
        35,000 school psychologists who practice in schools in the United States 
        as key professionals that promote the learning and mental health of all 
        children;
Whereas the National Association of School Psychologists establishes and 
        maintains high standards for training, practice, and school psychologist 
        credentialing, in collaboration with organizations such as the American 
        Psychological Association, that promote effective and ethical services 
        by school psychologists to children, families, and schools;
Whereas the people of the United States should recognize the vital role school 
        psychologists play in the personal and academic development of the 
        Nation's children; and
Whereas the week beginning on November 9, 2009, would be an appropriate week to 
        designate as National School Psychology Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of National School Psychology Week;
            (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of school psychologists 
        to the success of students in schools across the United States; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe the week 
        with appropriate activities that promote awareness of the vital role 
        school psychologists play in schools, in the community, and in helping 
        students develop into successful and productive members of society.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Graham K. Cooper, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 7, 2009



/s/ Graham K. CooperGraham K. CooperChief Financial Officer and Treasurer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: July 30, 2015   /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.