alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                 |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the Company. |

|                                  |                                                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  August      13, 2009 | /s/      Edward J. Geletka                               |   |
|                                  | Edward      J. Geletka,                                  |   |
|                                  | President      and Chief Executive Officer               |
|                                  |                                                     |   |
| Date:  August      13, 2009 | /s/      L. Joseph Stella, III, CPA                      |   |
|                                  | L.      Joseph Stella, III, CPA                          |   |
|                                  | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**




**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the report of Fuqi International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Yu
                Kwai ChongYu
                Kwai ChongChief
                Executive Officer and President(Principal
                Executive Officer)August
                12 , 2008





/s/ Ching
                Wan WongChing
                Wan WongChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer and Accounting Officer)August
                12, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Fuqi International, Inc. and will be retained by Fuqi International,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request
#### Ex parte Augustine ARIZA.

No. 328-96.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 20, 1996.

Grady L. Roberts, Jr., Pearsall, for appellant.

Jeffrey L. Van Horn, Asst. State’s Attorney, Austin, Matthew Paul, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

*OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

PER CURIAM.

Applicant was charged with engaging in organized criminal activity by delivering marihuana. Prior to his trial on this charge the State obtained a civil forfeiture judgment against Appellant’s pickup truck in accord with the provisions of Chapter 59 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Applicant filed a pre-trial application for a writ of habeas corpus contending that the pending criminal prosecution was barred by double jeopardy provisions because he had already been punished by the forfeiture of his truck. The trial court denied relief and Applicant appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s ruling, holding that the forfeiture constituted punishment for double jeopardy purposes. The court ordered that habeas relief be granted. Ex parte *Ariza,*913 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.App. — Austin 1996).

The State filed a petition for discretionary review contending that the civil forfeiture was not punishment for double jeopardy purposes. After the date on which the Court of Appeals issued its opinion in this case, this Court addressed the same issue in *Fant v. State,*931 S.W.2d 299 (Tex.Cr.App.1996). In *Fant*we held that Chapter 59 civil *in rem*forfeitures do not constitute punishment under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. *Id.,*at 219. Accordingly, we summarily grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and affirm the trial court’s order denying relief.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.03



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K/A, into ATMI, Inc.'s previously filed
Registration Statements File Nos. 33-77060, 33-93048, 333-49561, 333-56349, 333-
55827, 333-82089 and 333-94641. We also consent to the application of our report
to the schedule labeled "Valuation and Qualifying Accounts" as of the date and
period covered by our report.


                                         /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Transition Period Report on Form
10KSB for the period ended October 31, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Superclick, Incorporated.

Date: January 29, 2004                      By: /s/ Todd M. Pitcher
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Name: Todd M. Pitcher
                                            Title: Chairman
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Billy C. Duvall,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 12, 2006



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/ Billy C. Duvall                     
|Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
**EXHIBIT        13.2**

**CERTIFICATION        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT        TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (i)    | the                  Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended                  December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (ii)   | the                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all                  material                  respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                  Company.                                                                                                           |

|   | By:    | *“G.                  Ross McDonald”* |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | [Missing                  Graphic Reference]      |
|   | Name:  | **G.                  Ross McDonald**             |
|   | Title: | **Chief                  Financial Officer**      |
|   | Date:  | March                  20, 2005                   |

*This        written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission        as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of        this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff        upon request. *

*This        certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent        required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section        18        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").        Such        certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any        filing        under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except        to the        extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.*
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ruben Myran Johnson, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-18-00889-PHX-DWL

ORDER 

DEATH PENALTY CASE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting the parties’ proposed briefing schedule 

(Doc. 35) as follows: 

1. Johnson shall file his reply to Respondents’ answer no later than July 11, 

2019; 

2. Any Notice of a Request for Evidentiary Development shall be filed no 

later than August 26, 2019; 

3. A Response to any Notice of Request for Evidentiary Development shall be 

filed no later than September 25, 2019; 

4. A Reply to any Response to a Notice of a Request for Evidentiary 

Development shall be filed no later than October 10, 2019. 

Dated this 16th day of May, 2019.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kristopher A. LANG, Appellant.

No. 54087.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 24, 1989.

*725Richard A. Barry, III, St. Louis, for appellant.

Timothy M. Joyce, Pros. Atty., Warren-ton, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

Defendant was charged with endangering the welfare of two children by *allomng*them to consume intoxicating liquor on December 10, 1984, under § 585.050, a nonexistent statute. He was convicted in a bench trial of endangering their welfare by *aiding and encouraging*said children to consume intoxicating liquor under § 568.050, RSMo 1986. We reverse.

On February 19, 1986, the State was granted leave to file an information in lieu of indictment. The information filed on that date charged defendant with endangering the welfare of two children by *al-lomng them to consume intoxicating liquor*contrary to § 585.050, RSMo. There was, and is, no such § 585.050.

On February 23, 1987, the prosecuting attorney received leave to file an amended information showing the date of consumption of the liquor to be November 16, 1984, instead of December 10, 1984. This information contained the same erroneous § 585.050 and the same charge *allomng said children to consume intoxicating liquor.*This amended information superseded the previous information filed on February 19, 1986. § 545.110, RSMo 1986.

On August 25, 1987, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the State’s amended information on the grounds the term “allowing” was neither utilized in the underlying statute, § 568.050, RSMo, nor in MAI-CR3d 322.10, and there was no such statute as § 585.050. The trial court denied defendant’s motion and allowed the prosecuting attorney to amend the information by interlineation. On the same day, a bench trial was had, and the defendant was found guilty of encouraging and aiding the children to consume liquor.

The amended information was not amended by interlineation. The original, February 19,1986 information, was amended by pen showing the correct statute as 568.050, crossing out the word “allowing” and substituting therefor the words “encouraging, aiding or causing” the children to consume intoxicating liquor.

In its findings, the trial court stated the State had to prove defendant encouraged, aided or caused the children to consume intoxicating liquor. The State makes no contention the charge of “allowing” is sufficient.

The trial record does not show any amendment of the amended information. The defendant objected to the amended information, his motion was denied, and the amended information was not corrected. Because the amended information superseded the previous information, and the amended information did not set forth an offense contemplated by § 568.050, the defendant must be discharged. *See State v. Andrysek,*716 S.W.2d 312, 313-14 (Mo.App.1986). Because we reverse on this point, we need not decide the validity of defendant’s other points on appeal.

Judgment reversed.

CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Veronica L. Davis v

. James A. West and Houston Reporting

Services

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00463

- CV

Trial court case number: 40,104

Trial court: 149th District Court of Brazoria County

Date motion filed: April 16, 2014

Party filing motion: Appellant , Veronica L. Davis

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s si gnature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown

Date: June 3, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, H. Kerr Taylor, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, in my capacity as an officer of the General Partner of the Company, that,
to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                        |       |                                                                                                                                                              
|----------------------- | ----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 | By:   | /s/ H. Kerr Taylor                                                                                                                                           
|                        | Name: | H. Kerr Taylor                                                                                                                                               
|                        | Title | President and Chief Executive Officer of AmREIT Monthly Income &
 Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income &
 Growth Fund IV, L.P.

---
Exhibit 32.1

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In
connection with the periodic report of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph A. Jolson, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 4, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph A. Jolson   
|                     |  |  |  | Joseph A. Jolson       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies
this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard M. Lerner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 25, 2011 |  | /s/ Richard M. Lerner  
|               |  | Richard M. Lerner      
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 CELESTY TSOSIE,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. No. 35,031

5 NEW MEXICO PUBLIC

6 DEFENDER DEPARTMENT,

7 Defendant-Appellee.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY

9 Louis E. DePauli Jr., District Judge

10 Celesty Tsosie

11 Farmington, NM

12 Pro Se Appellant

13 Ripley B. Harwood

14 Albuquerque, NM

15 for Appellee

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 SUTIN, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} DISMISSED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 

6 __________________________________

7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _______________________________

10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

11 _______________________________

12 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge