alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      William E. Hitselberger, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      PMA Capital Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the information contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
      of PMA Capital Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMA Capital
      Corporation. A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
                William E. HitselbergerWilliam
                E. HitselbergerExecutive
                Vice President and ChiefFinancial
                OfficerSeptember 16,
                2005
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jason Hanson, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)         the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Search By Headlines.com Corp. for the quarterly
period ended April 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Search By Headlines.com
Corp.

Dated: June 7, 2010

/s/ Jason Hanson
  Jason HansonPresident, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Search By
Headlines.com Corp. and will be retained by Search By Headlines.com Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1461]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee; Open Committee 
Meeting

    According to the provisions of section 10 of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee will be held on--
Thursday, March 7, 1996.
    The meeting will start at 10:45 a.m. and will be held in Room 
5A06A, Office of Personnel Management Building, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee is composed of a 
Chairman, five representatives from labor unions holding exclusive 
bargaining rights for Federal blue-collar employees, and five 
representatives from Federal agencies. Entitlement to membership on the 
Committee is provided for in 5 U.S.C. 5347.
    The Committee's primary responsibility is to review the Prevailing 
Rate System and other matters pertinent to establishing prevailing 
rates under subchapter IV, chapter 53, 5 U.S.C., as amended, and from 
time to time advise the Office of Personnel Management.
    These scheduled meetings will start in open session with both labor 
and management representatives attending. During the meeting either the 
labor members or the management members may caucus separately with the 
Chairman to devise strategy and formulate positions. Premature 
disclosure of the matters discussed in these caucuses would 
unacceptably impair the ability of the Committee to reach a consensus 
on the matters being considered and would disrupt substantially the 
disposition of its business. Therefore, these caucuses will be closed 
to the public because of a determination made by the Director of the 
Office of Personnel Management under the provisions of section 10(d) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B). The caucuses may, depending on the issues involved, 
constitute a substantial portion of the meeting.
    Annually, the Chairman compiles a report of pay issues discussed 
and concluded recommendations. These reports are available to the 
public, upon written request to the Committee's Secretary.
    The public is invited to submit material in writing to the Chairman 
on Federal Wage System pay matters felt to be deserving of the 
Committee's attention. Additional information on these meetings may be 
obtained by contacting the Committee's Secretary, Office of Personnel 
Management, Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, Room 5559, 1900 
E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415 (202) 606-1500.

    Dated: January 19, 1996.
Anthony F. Ingrassia,
Chairman, Federal Prevailing Rate, Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-1461 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
#### The Anderson Realty Co. *v.*City of Cleveland et al.

(No. 23211

Decided October 23, 1931.)

*Mr. John D. Fackler*and *Mr. W. H. Boyd,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Harold H. Burton,*director of law, *Mr. Henry*
      *662
      *8. Bramará*and *Mr. Ray T. Miller,*prosecuting attorney, for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Jones, Day, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Chad Dodson Roofing, LLC, * From the County Court

 at Law of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 22,574.

Vs. No. 11-14-00281-CV * November 14, 2014

Paula (Coots) Gutierrez, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 

against Chad Dodson Roofing, LLC.
Order entered April 4 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00450
- CR ANTONIO PATTERSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10
- 59304
- K



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES this appeal. On March 18, 2014, this Court ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why court reporter Janice Garrett has not filed the reporter’s record in this appeal. We ADOPT the findings t hat: (1) Ms. Garrett is not deliberately disobeying orders of this Court; (2) the notes have not been lost; (3) Ms. Garrett’s explanation for the delay in filing this record is her workload; and (4) Ms. Garrett stated she could file the reporter’s record in this appeal within thirty days of the March 26, 2014 findings. Because the record is already nine months overdue, the Court will reserve the issue of whether Ms. Garrett shall be required to surrender her notes for preparation by another court reporter

.We ORDER Janice Garrett to file, by MAY 2, 2014 , the complete reporter’s record,

including exhibits. If the Court does not receive the complete reporter’s record by the date specified, the Court may order that Janice Garrett surrender her notes of this case to the trial court for another court reporter to prepare the record. The Court further ORDER S that Janice Garr ett not sit as a court reporter until the complete record is filed in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by elect ronic transmission, to the Honorable Dominique Collins, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 4; Janice Garrett, court reporter; counsel for all parties; and to the Dallas County Auditor’s Office.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30863-30864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15442]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30864]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Research


Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee; Open Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770), notice is given of a meeting of 
the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee.

DATES: Tuesday, July 16, 1996, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, July 
17, 1996, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and Thursday, July 18, 1996, 9:00 
a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Gaithersburg Hilton Hotel, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, 
MD 20877.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert L. Opdenaker, III, Executive 
Assistant Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, GTN, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Washington, DC 20585, Telephone: 301-903-4941.

SUPPLEMENTary INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Meeting: The Committee will discuss alternative 
fusion concepts and inertial fusion energy and will present the 
Committee report on major fusion facilities.
    Tentative Agenda:
    Tuesday-Thursday, July 16-18, 1996:

--DOE Perspective on the Future of the Fusion Program
--Highlights of Scientific Issues Subcommittee:
    Finding and Recommendations on Major Facilities
--Scientific Issues Subcommittee Discussion of:
    Alternatives
    Inertial Fusion Energy
--Discussions of Possible New Charges
--Public Comments (10 minute rule)

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Albert Opdenaker at the 
address or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral 
statements must be received 5 days prior to the meeting; reasonable 
provision will be made to include the statement in the agenda. The 
Chairperson of the Committee is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 30 days at the Freedom of Information Public 
Reading Room, I-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC on June 12, 1996.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-15442 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Gloria 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 7, 2014

No. 04-14-00561-CV

Noe GARCIA and Iris Garcia,

Appellants

v.

Gloria GARCIA,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-12-335

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant’s brief is due on November 4, 2014.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
YzApp International Inc: Exhibit 10.16 - Prepared by TNT Filings Inc.




  




Exhibit 10.16 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EARN-IN AMENDMENT 



This First Amendment
to Earn-In Agreement (this "Amendment") is made as of
February_____, 2009, by and between New Zealand Wayne’s Investment Holdings Co.,
Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company ( (the "Company") and the
individual signatory hereto (the "Buyer"). Terms not otherwise
defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning given to such terms in the
Earn-In Agreement (defined below). 


BACKGROUND 


The Company and the
Buyer entered into that certain EARN-IN AGREEMENT, dated as of September 12,
2008 (the "Earn-In Agreement"), pursuant to which, among others,
the Buyer has an option to purchase certain amount of shares of the Company’s
ordinary shares upon the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth therein.
The parties hereto now desire to amend the definition of the first condition.


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and of good and valuable consideration, the
sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto,
intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree as follows: 

1. 


The Definition of "Condition 1" set forth in Exhibit A Certain Definitions of
the Earn-In Agreement is hereby restated to be and read as follows: 


"Condition 1"
means the occurrence of the date that is six months after the date of this
Agreement, provided, however, that (a) on or before that date, Ms.
Lianyun Han and the Operating Company have entered into a binding employment
agreement, in form and substance satisfactory to Company, for a term of not less
than five years for Ms. Lianyun Han to serve as Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Operating Company; and (b) Ms. Lianyun Han is employed by the
Operating Company pursuant to that agreement on such date. 

2. 


This Amendment shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region without giving effect to the principles
of conflict of laws thereof. 

3. 


Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and provisions of the Earn-In
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and the Earn-In Agreement, as
previously amended, is in all respects ratified and confirmed. 

4. 


This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which, when
executed and delivered, shall be deemed an original and all of which taken
together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature Page Follows] 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
above written date. 


	Company:	Buyer:
	NEW ZEALAND WAYNE’S	 
	INVESTMENT HOLDINGS CO., LTD., a	 
	company formed and existing under the laws	 
	of the British Virgin Islands	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By :                                                                                       
    	                                                                                      
    
	Name:	 
	Title:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

HAKIF NAMANI,

Petitioner

v.

BEZARK, LERNER & DEVIRGILIS, P.C. 

AND STUART WINEGRAD, ESQUIRE,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 49 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant. 

CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (DTF) 

ORDER 

 

 The Court has taken under advisement the Motion to Dismiss Indictment Due to 

Selective Enforcement (Doc. 186) and the Motion to Estop Government from Arguing 

Directly Contrary Positions for Strategic Gain (Doc. 170) filed by the Defendant. The Court 

has considered all evidence and reviewed all admitted exhibits. The Motion to Dismiss 

Indictment is DENIED. 

The Court also finds the Motion for Estop is DENIED. The Government’s position 

is not inherently inconsistent. 

 Dated this 21st day of May, 2019.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 60445 Summary Calendar

**Marco Antonio Mercado**

**- Alvarez,** 

Petitioner **,**

versus
**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A098 895 650

Before **Barksdale, Elrod,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Marco Antonio Mercado

- Alvarez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, was ordered removed in absentia in 2006. He petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ ) denial of his 2018 motion to reopen his removal

* Pursuant to **5th Cir**  **cuit R**  **ule** 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 3, 20 22 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-60445 Document: 00516418564 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2022No. 21

- 60445

2 proceeding

. Mercado contends the BIA erred by declin ing to consider whether he was entitled to equitable tolling of the statutory deadline for filing his motion because he did not present that issue to the IJ.

The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for obvious reasons

“ under a highly deferential abuse

- of

- discretion standard ”

. Singh v. Gonzales , 436 F.3d 484, 487 (5th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted)

. Under that standard,

our court may not disturb the BIA’s decision unless it is “capricious, without foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so irrational that it is arbitrary rather than the result of any perceptible rational approach”

. Gomez

- Palacios v. Holder , 560 F.3d 354, 358 (5th Cir. 2009). Questions of law are reviewe d de

novo ; factual findings, for substantial evidence. Id. The IJ’s decision is considered only to the extent it influenced the BIA. Id. “This court has long held that the BIA need not consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal

. ” Cantarero

- Lagos v. Barr , 924 F.3d 145, 153 (5th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted)

. Mercado fails to show it was erroneous or otherwise irrational for the BIA to not consider his issue

. See Gomez

Palacios , 560 F.3d at 358.

**DENIED**

. Case: 21-60445 Document: 00516418564 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2022
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

LABCORP
Laboratory Corporation of America

Laboratory Corporation of America(TM)Holdings
348 South Main Street
Burlington, North Carolina 27215
Telephone: 800-222-7566, extension 6582
FAX:  910-229-4847

MICHAEL K. MOORE
AVP - FACILITIES PLANNING


January 6, 1998

Mr. Bill Green
AutoCyte
112 Orange Drive
Elon College, NC 27244

Re:  Lease between LabCorp and AutoCyte for 112 Orange Drive, Elon College, NC

Dear Mr. Green:

LabCorp hereby acknowledges that AutoCyte wishes to continue its tenancy on a
month to month basis until such time as AutoCyte's new building is completed.
The rental rate will remain $9,281.25 per month.

AutoCyte is obligated to give LabCorp a 30 day written notice of intent to
vacate, as stated in paragraph 5 of the Lease.

Sincerely,


/s/ Michael K. Moore

Michael K. Moore
AVP - Facilities Planning
Exhibit
32.1-Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002


The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of TrinityCare Senior Living, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date
hereof:
  (a)
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(b)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
    Date: May
19, 2009







/s/ Donald W. Sapaugh
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 545 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 73
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 545

                          [Report No. 111-156]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2346) making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2009

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2346) making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2346) making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
    Sec. 2.  The Chair may postpone further consideration of the 
conference report to such time as may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                  House Calendar No. 73

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 545

                          [Report No. 111-156]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2346) making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 15, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```