alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Diago Atavio Querta, 

Defendant.

No. 18-04049MJ-001-PCT

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 a 

pretrial release revocation hearing was submitted. The Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant has violated the terms of defendant’s previously 

imposed pretrial release conditions as alleged in the Petition to Revoke. After 

considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), the Court concludes there are no 

conditions or combination of conditions which will assure the defendant will not flee or 

pose a danger to the safety of other persons or the community and that if there were such 

conditions the defendant is unlikely to abide by such conditions.

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained.

Dated this 29th day of May, 2018.

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Synova Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2005 (the "Report") that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  October 3, 2005                         /s/ Stephen E. King
       ----------------------------            ---------------------------------
                                               Stephen E. King
                                               Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64149, 66495.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 28, 1995.

Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINBARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his conviction by a jury of unlawful possession of cocaine in violation of § 195.202 RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to two years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal,1 Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant’s contention to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

1

. Defendant also filed a separate appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after evidentiary hearing. However, Defendant makes no assignment of error with respect to that ruling and the appeal is therefore deemed abandoned.
#### FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dr. Edward L. EYERMAN, Jr., Defendant/Appellant, and Mid-Western Medical Leasing of St. Louis, Inc., Intervenor/Appellant.

No. 67180.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Nov. 14, 1995.

Anthony G. Tumminello, Tumminello & Associates, St. Louis, for appellant.

Rollin J. Moerschel, V. Scott Williams, St. Charles, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

In this court tried ease, defendant and intervenor appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff on all counts. Plaintiff sued defendant on a promissory note signed by defendant. Defendant counterclaimed and appellant Mid-Western Medical Leasing intervened, both claiming defendant should be released from the promissory note and an additional $30,000 paid to plaintiff by intervenor should be returned.

The trial court’s judgment in this case is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence.' *Murphy v. Carrón,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information explaining the reasons for this order. The *773judgment of the trial court is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.25

Amendment No. 1 
to the
2002 Equity Incentive Plan

The last sentence of Section 11(p) of the 2002 Equity Incentive  Plan
(the Plan) is hereby amended to read as follows:

| | Unless
earlier terminated by action of the Board, the Plan will remain in effect until  such
time as no Stock remains available for delivery under the Plan and the  Company has no
further rights or obligations under the Plan with respect to  outstanding Awards under
the Plan; provided, however, that no Awards may be  granted under the Plan on a date that
is more than ten years from the date the  Plan was last approved by shareholders.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Adoption by the Board of Directors  February 6,  2002 
Date of Approval of Shareholders  April 22, 2002 
Date of Amendment by  Stock Option Committee  March 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroGrow International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, H. MacGregor Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.





Date:  August 19, 2009
By:
/s/ H. MacGregor ClarkeH. MacGregor ClarkeChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection  with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S, (the  "Company")
on Form  20-F  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, SOREN
DEGN, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company,

        A signed  original of this written  statement  has been  provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request,

Dated:  June 23, 2006                       /s/ Soren Degn
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Soren Degn
                                                Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company
Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Wang Chang Shun, President of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

       1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: June 29, 2004




                                       By: /s/ Wang Chang Shun
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name: Wang Chang Shun
                                       Title: President


*      This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
       Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
       by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
       purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
       amended.

*      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
       the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
       be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
       Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
report of Ridgewood Energy O Fund, LLC (the Fund) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2007 as furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.

|       |  |                  |  |     |  |        |  |                                                      
|------ |  | ---------------- |  | --- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: |  | November 2, 2007 |  |     |  |        |  | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY O FUND,
 LLC                        
|       |  |                  |  |     |  |        |  |                                                      
|       |  |                  |  | By: |  | /s/    |  | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    
|       |  |                  |  |     |  | Name:  |  | Robert E. Swanson                                    
|       |  |                  |  |     |  | Title: |  | President and Chief
 Executive Officer               
|       |  |                  |  |     |  |        |  | (Principal Executive
 Officer)                       
|       |  |                  |  |     |  |        |  |                                                      
|Dated: |  | November 2, 2007 |  |     |  |        |  |                                                      
|       |  |                  |  | By: |  | /s/    |  | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 
|       |  |                  |  |     |  | Name:  |  | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 
|       |  |                  |  |     |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President
 and Chief Financial Officer
|       |  |                  |  |     |  |        |  | (Principal Financial and
 Accounting Officer)        

A signed original of this
written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to Ridgewood Energy O Fund, LLC and
will be retained by Ridgewood Energy O Fund, LLC and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

22

---
**D
      E V I S S E R G R A Y L L P**


**CHARTERED
      ACCOUNTANTS**





401
      - 905
      West Pender Street


Vancouver,
      BC Canada


V6C
      1L6





Tel:
      (604) 687-5447


Fax:
      (604) 687-6737




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**





To
      the
      Board of Directors,


Atna
      Resources Ltd.





We
      consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of Atna Resources Ltd. on Form
      20-F of our report to the shareholders on the consolidated financial statements
      of that company as at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the years
      in
      the three year period ended December 31, 2007. Our report was dated March 27,
      2008.





/s/ “De
      Visser Gray LLP”





Chartered
      Accountants


Vancouver,
      BC, Canada


March
      27,
      2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6428

PEARLIE INGRAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior 

District Judge. (9:14-cv-04771-CMC)

Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: January 6, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pearlie Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Neale Garner, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Pearlie Lee Ingram appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We 

affirm.

A writ of error coram nobis can be used to vacate a 

conviction when a fundamental error resulted in conviction and 

no other means of relief is available. United States v. Denedo, 

556 U.S. 904, 911 (2009); United States v. Akinsade, 686 F.3d 

248, 252 (4th Cir. 2012). But see Carlisle v. United States, 

517 U.S. 416, 429 (1996) (“[I]t is difficult to conceive of a 

situation in a federal criminal case today where a writ of coram 

nobis would be necessary or appropriate.” (alteration and 

internal quotation marks omitted)). We review for abuse of 

discretion the district court’s decision to deny coram nobis 

relief. Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 575 (4th Cir.

2013).

Applying these standards, we conclude that the district 

court did not err in denying Ingram’s petition for writ of coram 

nobis. Accordingly, we deny Ingram’s motions to consider new 

evidence and for oral argument and affirm the judgment of the 

district court. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AirGate PCS, Inc. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David E. Sharbutt, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ David E.Sharbutt

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

|        |  |                                     |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|-------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name:  |  | DavidE. Sharbutt                    |
| Title: |  | Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer |
| Date:  |  | August 9,2005                       |
|        |

This certification accompaniesthe Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CONSUMERS U.S., INC. INCLUDED IN FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-05-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,025
<INVENTORY>                                    120,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,205
<PP&E>                                         368,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 624,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,180
<BONDS>                                        152,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           55,983
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           170
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   624,584
<SALES>                                        569,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               569,441
<CGS>                                          523,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  523,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,784)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (11,200)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,358)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00430-CR

JESSE HARGROVE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-2208-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jesse Hargrove was convicted of evading arrest or detention using a vehicle and 

sentenced to three years in prison. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04 (West Supp. 2012). 

He appealed that conviction. On January 4, 2013, we received a copy of an order signed 

by the trial court which granted Hargrove’s motion for new trial. By letter dated 

January 9, 2013, the clerk of this Court notified the parties that, because the trial court 

granted a new trial, we would dismiss the appeal as moot unless, within 21 days from 
Hargrove v. State Page 2

the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. 

No response has been filed.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 7, 2013

Do not publish 

[CR25]
officerlisting.htm


    
      

    


    Exhibit
10.31

    


    Listing
of Executive Officers who are Parties to the Form of Change in Control Severance
Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to Compass Minerals International, Inc.’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007) and Restrictive
Covenant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Compass Minerals International,
Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 23, 2006).

    


     

    Keith
Clark

    


    Rodney
Underdown

    


    Gerald
Bucan

    


    Ron
Bryan
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/    Charif Souki                                                                                   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Charif SoukiChief Executive Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC,general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. |   |

----