alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit1027.htm


    Exhibit
10.27

     

    Summary
of Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers

     

    Our board
of directors periodically reviews the base salary of our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer.  The compensation committee periodically reviews the
base salary of each of our other Named Executive Officers.  The board
of directors or the compensation committee approved a schedule of the
following fiscal year 2009 base salaries for each of our named executive
officers:

     

    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Name
      and Principal Position

            	 
      	
              2009

              Base Salary

            	 
      
	
              Michael
      F. Neidorff

                  Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer

            	 
      	
              $

            	
              1,000,000

            	 
      
	
              Carol
      E. Goldman

                  Executive
      Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

            	 
      	
              $

            	
              425,000

            	 
      
	
              Jesse
      N. Hunter

                  Executive
      Vice President, Corporate Development

            	 
      	
              $

            	
              425,000

            	 
      
	
              William
      N. Scheffel

                  Executive
      Vice President, Specialty Business Unit

            	 
      	
              $

            	
              595,000

            	 
      
	
              Eric
      R. Slusser

                  Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

            	 
      	
              $

            	
              545,000
#### David LEWIS, Respondent, v. Holly F. LEWIS, Appellant.

No. WD 51595.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 8, 1996.

Mitchell J. Moore, Columbia, for appellant.

Douglas F. Pugh, Columbia, for respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Mother appeals from the circuit court’s order dissolving her marriage 'with Father and placing primary custody of their children with Father. Mother claims that the trial court erred in its award of custody because there was not sufficient evidence to support the custody decision and the trial court erroneously applied the law.

The judgment is affirmed. Ride 84.16(b).
NO. 07-03-0554-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JULY 21, 2004

______________________________

CATHERINE MENDOZA AND ARMANDO MENDOZA AND

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., A CHILD, APPELLANTS

V.

TEXAS DEPT. OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 3288-L; HONORABLE JAMES W. ANDERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Catherine Mendoza, a/k/a Catherine Mendoza Menzinni, filed a pro se

notice of appeal with this court on December 7, 2003, appealing a judgment terminating

her parental rights. In her notice of appeal, she indicated that she was indigent. We

abated the appeal and remanded the cause so the trial court could determine if Ms.

Mendoza was indigent and entitled to representation by counsel in her appeal. Tex. Fam.

Code Ann. § 263.405(e) (Vernon 2002).
-2-

The trial court held an evidentiary hearing on April 4, 2004, and determined that

appellant is not indigent. As a result, the clerk of this court notified appellant by letter on

June 3, 2004, that she was not entitled to proceed as an indigent and ordered her to pay

the appellate filing fee by July 2, 2004. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Appellant was also notified

that failure to pay the filing fee could result in dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. That

date has passed and no response has been received.

All parties have had more than ten days notice that dismissal could result from

appellant’s failure to comply with the rules and this court’s orders. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. 

James T. Campbell

 Justice
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sheddrick DENSON, Appellant.

No. WD 49207.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 29, 1995.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

*593Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sheddrick Denson appeals his convictions of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. He charges the circuit court with erroneously refusing to submit a jury instruction concerning eyewitness identification and with wrongly defining “reasonable doubt” in the jury instructions. We affirm. Finding no jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 30.25(b).
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 98-10287

Summary Calendar

________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY JAMES JORDAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CR-10-2

_________________________________________

October 14, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny James Jordan, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial

of hismotion for a new Judgment andCommitment Order reflecting hissubsequent

legal name change. For religious reasons, after his incarceration, Jordan changed
 

1Matthews v. Morales, 23 F.3d 118 (5th Cir. 1994); Felix v. Rolan, 833 F.2d 817 (5th

Cir. 1987).

2

his name to Oran Abdur Rahim. We perceive no reversible error in the trial court’s

denial of Jordan’s motion.1 Accordingly, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
ex1029ak.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    6-1162-TRW-0674

    


    


    American
Airlines, Inc.

    P.O. Box
619616

    Dallas-Fort
Worth Airport, Texas 75261-9616

    


    


    


    Subject:                      Business
Considerations

    


    
      	
              Reference:

            	
              Purchase
      Agreement No. 3219 (the Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company
      (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc. (Customer) relating to
      Model 787-923 aircraft (Aircraft) and 787-323 and 787-823 Substitute
      Aircraft (each Substitute Aircraft)

            


    

    


    


    This
letter agreement (Letter Agreement) amends and supplements the Purchase
Agreement. All terms used but not defined in this Letter Agreement have the same
meaning as in the Purchase Agreement.

    


    1.           Basic Credit – Firm
Aircraft.

    


    [CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]

    


    


    


    2.           Simulator
Package [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]

    


    


    [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    3.           [CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].

    


    4.           
Confidential
Treatment.

    


    Customer
and Boeing understand that certain commercial and financial information
contained in this Letter Agreement are considered by Boeing and Customer as
confidential. Customer and Boeing agree that each will treat this Letter
Agreement and the information contained herein as confidential and will not,
without the prior written consent of the other, disclose this Letter Agreement
or any information contained herein to any other person or entity, except as
provided in this Letter Agreement and or the Purchase Agreement.

    


    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    THE
BOEING COMPANY

    


    By                                          

    


    Its           Attorney-In-Fact           

    


    


    ACCEPTED
AND AGREED TO this

    


    Date:
                               ,
2008

    


    AMERICAN
AIRLINES, INC.

    


    


    By                                          

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Its                                          

            


    


    
      
        
          P.A. No.
3219                                                                                                                     


          Business
Considerations 

          BOEING
PROPRIETARY
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S. (the "Company")
on Form  20-F/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, SOREN
DEGN, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  November 29, 2005                          /s/ SOREN DEGN
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Soren Degn
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, James T. Healy, the chief executive officer of LogicVision, Inc. (the“Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

 

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
11 May 2000

                                    Agreement


                                    Between:


       Side A: Swiftnet Limited and Abraham Keinan (hereinafter Swiftnet)

                                       And

                  Side B: Guy Nissenson (hereinafter Nissenson)



1.   Swiftnet will employ  Nissenson  for the purpose  of business  development,
     sales and marketing.

2.   Swiftnet will pay Nissenson one thousand pounds a month.

3.   In case Swiftnet reaches average sales of 175,000 pounds per month (average
     of any following three month),  Mr.  Nissenson will receive a raise and his
     salary will be 2000 pounds per month.

4.   Nissenson  will receive  options to buy Swiftnet and other  companies  that
     will buy or merge into  Swiftnet in the future  according to the  following
     formula:

         50% of the options that Abraham Keinan will receive. These options will
         have the same price and conditions as Abraham Keinan options.


5.   The  options could  be taken progressively  and are transferable (Nissenson
      decision).

6.   Swiftnet  will have the  right to cancel  the  options  above  when the two
     following  conditions occur at the same time:  Nissenson does not work with
     Swiftnet and in the time of Nissenson's  activities or 12 month  afterwards
     Swiftnet and other  companies  that will buy or merge into  Swiftnet in the
     future did not reach even once the benchmark of 120,000 UK Pounds  revenues
     per month (will be calculated on an average of  consecutive  three months).
     In the case of  Swiftnet  and other  companies  that will buy or merge into
     Swiftnet in the future not reaching the 120,000 benchmark and goes public /
     has an ownership structure change before the end of the 12 month period the
     options will be granted.

7.   Swiftnet  and  Nissenson could  terminate  this agreement  at any  time.  A
     one-month written notice must be issued prior to Termination.

8.   In case of termination Sections 4 to 6 will still be valid.






Signatures:





-------------------------                   ----------------------
Swiftnet Limited.                            Guy Nissenson.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Northway Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 2000, relating
to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Northway Financial,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity,
comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1999.

                                       /S/ Shatswell, Macleod & Company, P.C.
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 28, 2000
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President and Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 11, 2008  /s/ Roderick Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 06, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0026. NU ZETA OF LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY v. RACHEL B. 

MCKENZIE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

SU11CV1485
Exhibit 10.01(m)


 


«Date»


 


 


«FirstName» «MiddleIni» «LastName»


«Address1»


«City», «State»  «ZipCode»


 


Dear «Nickname»:


 


Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 1999 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the 2009 Shareholder Value Plan (the “Program”),
on December 23, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of Equitable Resources, Inc. (the “Committee”) granted you «NumberUnits»  Share Units (the “Award”), the value of
which is determined by reference to the Company’s common stock.  The terms and conditions of the Award,
including, without limitation, vesting and distribution, shall be governed by
the provisions of the Program document attached hereto as Exhibit A,
provided that the Award is also subject to the terms and limits included within
the Plan.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Kimberly L. Sachse

  
	
   

  	
  For the Compensation
  Committee

  



 


 


The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt
of this award granted on the date shown above, the terms of which are subject
to the terms and conditions referenced above, and receipt of a copy of the
Program document, and agrees to be bound by all the provisions hereof and
thereof.


 


 


	
  Signature:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  «FirstName» «MiddleIni» «LastName»
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                      SECURITY CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED
                             ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY
                    4,595,988 SHARES OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK

   Security Capital Group Incorporated, a Maryland corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of Maryland that:

   FIRST: Pursuant to the authority granted to and vested in the Board of
Directors of the Corporation (the "Board of Directors"), in accordance with
Article FOURTH of the charter of the Corporation, including these Articles
Supplementary (the "Charter"), the Board of Directors adopted resolutions
classifying and designating 4,456,988 authorized but unissued shares of Class A
Stock (as defined in the Charter) and 139,000 authorized but unissued shares of
Series A Preferred Stock (as defined in the Charter) as shares of Class B Stock
(as defined in the Charter), or a total of 4,595,988 shares of Class B Stock,
with the preferences, rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends and other distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of
redemption of such Class B Stock set forth in the Charter.

   SECOND: The 4,595,988 shares of Class B Stock have been classified and
designated by the Board of Directors under the authority contained in the
Charter.

   THIRD: These Articles Supplementary have been approved by the Board of
Directors in the manner and by the vote required by law.

   FOURTH: The undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation acknowledges these Articles Supplementary to be the corporate act
of the Corporation and, as to all matters or facts required to be verified
under oath, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer acknowledges
that, to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters and
facts are true in all material respects and that this statement is made under
the penalties for perjury.

   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles Supplementary
to be executed under seal in its name and on its behalf by its Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and attested to by its Secretary on this 25th day of
September, 2000.

ATTEST:                              SECURITY CAPITAL GROUP
                                     INCORPORATED

/s/ Jeffrey A. Klopf                 By: /s/ William D. Sanders
Jeffrey A. Klopf                         William D. Sanders
Secretary                                Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

GASTON, HOUTZ, and MYERS

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Marcelo O. RIVERA-CRESPO

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202100328

_________________________

Decided: 28 March 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Melanie J. Mann

Sentence adjudged 28 September 2021 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 6 months, forfeiture of $1,190 pay per month for 12 

months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USN
United States v. Rivera-Crespo, NMCCA No. 202100328

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.1

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

 

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 In 2008 and 2007, the Board of Directors received monthly compensation for attendance of Board
Meetings. Prior to this time, there was no monthly compensation. However, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, non-employee Directors are eligible to receive stock option awards under the “2003 Stock Incentive Plan” for officers
and employees. 
  

 67
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, James T. Healy, the chief executive officer of LogicVision, Inc. (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

          (i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   | /s/ JAMES T. HEALY |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |                    |
|   | James T. Healy     |
|   |               |
|   | March 12, 2007     |
#### Edwin C. LESTER, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 93-SC-38-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 11, 1995.

Edwin C. Lester, Louisville, pro se.

Bruce K. Davis, Executive Director, Barbara S. Rea, Kentucky Bar Ass’n, Frankfort, for respondent.

*ORDER*

The application of Edwin C. Lester for reinstatement to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby granted. SCR 3.500(1).

Mr. Lester shall pay the costs incurred by the Kentucky Bar Association in the processing of the application.

All concur, except LEIBSON, J., not sitting.