alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF US LIQUIDS INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          2,203
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                      342
<INVENTORY>                                       567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                8,827
<PP&E>                                         43,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 55,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,705
<BONDS>                                        16,644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           73
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   55,016
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38,159
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,291
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,416
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .55


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin W Glass,

Plaintiff,

v. 

AsicNorth Incorporated,

Defendant.

No. CV-18-00898-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

At the termination of a case brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act 

(“ADA”), an award of attorneys’ fees to the defendant “should be permitted not routinely, 

not simply because [the defendant] succeeds, but only where the action brought is found to 

be unreasonable, frivolous, meritless1 or vexatious.” Christiansburg Garment Co. v. 

EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 421 (1978) (citation and internal quotations omitted). Defendant 

moves for an award of attorneys’ fees, asserting that Plaintiff’s suit was merely “part of a 

pattern by Plaintiff of asserting ADA claims against employers and instituting litigation 

that is determined to be without legal basis” and noting that Plaintiff failed to submit 

admissible evidence that he was disabled or that the performance-based reason given for 

his termination was pretextual. (Doc. 59 at 3, 5.) The Court has considered the briefs 

(Docs. 59, 64, 67) and concludes no exceptional circumstance justifying an award of 

attorneys’ fees to Defendant is present here. 

1 Meritless, in this context, is defined as “groundless or without foundation, rather 

than simply that the plaintiff has ultimately lost his case.” Christiansburg, 434 U.S. at 421. 

Case 2:18-cv-00898-DLR Document 74 Filed 04/15/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

First, the Court is unconvinced that Plaintiff’s earlier ADA suits against one prior 

employer, which failed on the merits, reveal a pattern of bad faith and groundless 

litigation.2 Second, Plaintiff’s failure to submit admissible evidence that he was disabled 

during the relevant period does not mean that his case was frivolous or meritless. In his 

surreply, Plaintiff submitted medical reports supporting the existence of carpal tunnel, but 

the Court did not consider the new evidence because Plaintiff had not previously disclosed

it in discovery. (Doc. 57 at 1.) The Court cannot conclude that his claim was meritless or 

frivolous. Third, Plaintiff’s inability to show that the reason for his termination was 

pretextual does not render his claim unreasonable, frivolous, meritless, or vexatious. 

Again, a defendant’s success on the merits does not equate with a plaintiff’s claim wholly 

lacking merit. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees (Doc. 59) is 

DENIED. 

Dated this 15th day of April, 2020.

Douglas L. Rayes

United States District Judge

2 With that said, Plaintiff now has experience bringing several ADA suits. If in the 

future Plaintiff decides to bring another case based on an alleged disability, he should be 

prepared to demonstrate that he is, in fact, disabled (something he has not done here or in 

his previous cases). 

Case 2:18-cv-00898-DLR Document 74 Filed 04/15/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 19

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060-9 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060-9 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                August 13, 2008 |   | /s/                Jana Whitlock                                                                                               |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Jana Whitlock, President, CEO, CFO,Treasurer and Director (Principal FinancialOfficer) |

----
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc.
(“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I,
Zahir Teja, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)  the
Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




August
      14, 2008
              By:
              /s/  Zahir
      TejaZahir
      TejaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Cambridge  Energy  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Perry
Douglas West, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



    By:    /s/ Perry Douglas West
    ---------------------------
           Perry Douglas West
           Chief Executive Officer

  Date:    August 20, 2002
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09
- 1 8
- 00 420
- CV



### _________________ TRACEY DENBY , Appellant
V. JOSEPH HERMAN , Appellee

________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 172nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. E
- 201,324

________________________________________________________________________ ORDER On March 28, 2019, we dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). On April 29, 2019, the appellant, Trac ey Denby, filed a motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. W e granted the motion for extension of time and the appellant filed a motion for rehearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.1 , 49.8

. The appellee, Joseph Herman , filed a response to the motion for rehearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.2

.2 The motion for rehearing filed by the appellant is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.3. We withdraw our Opinion of March 28, 2019, and the judgment ent ered thereon on the same date. We reinstate the appeal on the Court’s docket. The brief of the appellant, received May 6, 2019, is filed. The brief of the appellee is due Friday, June 21, 2019

. ORDER ENTERED May 2 0 , 201 9

. PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15487]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Docket No. 4433]


Food Service Equipment Industry Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade 
Practices and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Set aside order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order reopens a 1941 consent order--which prohibited the 
Food Service from selling certain equipment through anyone other than 
recognized dealers, and from selling equipment directly to buyers--and 
sets aside the consent order, as to respondent Food Service Equipment 
Distributors Association, pursuant to the Commission's Sunset Policy 
Statement, under which the Commission presumes that the public interest 
requires terminating competition orders that are more than 20 years 
old.

DATES: Consent order issued October 15, 1941. Set aside order issued 
September 21, 1995.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Consent Order and Set Aside Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Baruch, FTC/S-2115, 
Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-2861.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Matter of Food Service Equipment 
Industry Inc., et al. The prohibited trade practices and/or corrective 
actions are removed as indicated.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15487 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30222-30223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15221]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30223]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary 
Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary 
Advisory Council Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NOAA will conduct a meeting of the Sanctuary Advisory Council 
(SAC) for the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary 
on June 17, 1996, in Honolulu, Hawaii. The SAC was established to 
advise NOAA's Sanctuaries and Reserves Division regarding the 
development and management of the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale 
National Marine Sanctuary. The Advisory Council was established under 
the National Marine Sanctuaries Act.

TIME AND PLACE: The meeting will be held on Monday, June 17, 1996, from 
9: AM until 3:30 PM, at the Honolulu International Airport, Interisland 
Terminal, Ohia Room #1, 7th floor.

AGENDA: General issues related to the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale 
National Marine Sanctuary are expected to be discussed, including an 
update on recent meetings held in Washington, D.C., updates from the 
SAC subcommittees (boundary, regulatory and management), and 
presentations from other West Coast Sanctuary Managers.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to the public, and 
interested persons will be permitted to present oral or written 
statements on agenda items. Seats will be available on a first-come, 
first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allen Tom (808) 879-2818 or Brady Phillips at (301) 713-3141, ext. 169.

Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429, Marine Sanctuary 
Program

    Dated: June 7, 1996.
David L. Evans,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal 
Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 96-15221 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14800]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Information Collection Submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget for Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    The proposal for the collection of information described below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms 
may be obtained by contacting the Bureau's clearance officer at the 
phone number listed below. Comments and suggestions on the proposal 
should be made directly to the bureau clearance officer and to the 
Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1028-
0048), Washington, DC 20503.
    Title: Earthquake Report.
    OMB approval number: 1928-0048.
    Abstract: Respondents supply information on the effects of the 
shaking from an earthquake--on themselves personally, buildings and 
their effects, other man-made structures, and ground effects such as 
faulting or landslides. This information will be used in the study of 
the hazards from earthquakes and used to compile and publish the annual 
USGS publication ``United States Earthquakes''.
    Bureau form number: 9-3013.
    Frequency: After each earthquake.
    Description of respondents: State and local employees; and, the 
general public.
    Estimated completion time: 0.1 hours.
    Annual responses: 1,500.
    Annual burden hours: 150 hours.
    Bureau clearance officer: John Cordyack, 703-648-7313.

    Dated: May 3, 1996.
P. Patrick Leahy,
Chief Geologist.
[FR Doc. 96-14800 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-31-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 23, 2021

No. 04-21-00291-CV

IN RE Kayla WALSER

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVOM-21-0000015

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. This 

court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may 

file a response to the petition in this court no later than August 9, 2021. Any such response must 

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. Relator’s motion for temporary relief is 

GRANTED, and we order that the trial court’s temporary orders are STAYED pending our 

disposition of relator’s petition.

Furthermore, the mandamus record contains documents in which the full names of the 

children were not redacted as per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9. See id. R. 9.9(c). We 

therefore ORDER that the appendix is STRICKEN and ORDER relator to file an amended 

appendix, appropriately redacted, by July 28, 2021.

It is so ORDERED July 23, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 778 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the White House’s 

increasing use of ‘‘czars’’ leads to inadequate vetting standards and 

unacceptable growth in the size and scope of the Federal Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 

Mr. MORAN of Kansas submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the White House’s increasing use of ‘‘czars’’ leads to 

inadequate vetting standards and unacceptable growth 

in the size and scope of the Federal Government. 

Whereas ‘‘czars’’ have traditionally been appointed by the 

President of the United States to serve as policy advisors 

and agency heads; 

Whereas President Obama has appointed an unprecedented 

three dozen ‘‘czars’’ since his inauguration on January 

20, 2009; 

Whereas the ‘‘czar’’ nomination process rarely involves a Senate vote of approval as outlined in the Constitution of the 

United States while the President’s cabinet and Supreme 

Court nominees undergo careful public scrutiny; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 778 IH 

Whereas ‘‘czars’’ have been intended to increase efficiency, 

they traditionally reduce accountability, transparency, 

and legislative oversight; 

Whereas the implementation of three dozen czars adds to an 

ever-expanding Federal bureaucracy in both size and 

scope while concentrating policymaking decisions in the 

hands of a few unconfirmed officials; 

Whereas the appointment of executive ‘‘czars’’ clouds the 

issue of separation of powers between the ‘‘three separate, but equal’’ branches of the Federal Government as 

outlined in the Constitution of the United States; 

Whereas the controversy surrounding the former ‘‘Green Jobs 

Czar’’, Van Jones, could have been avoided through the 

constitutionally outlined practice of Senate confirmation 

proceedings; and 

Whereas the ‘‘czars’’ unnecessarily inflate the payroll of the 

administration by redundantly performing tasks under 

the jurisdictions of the Senate-approved cabinet department secretaries: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) demands that the White House rescind all 

3 czar appointments until proper vetting can occur; 

4 and 

5 (2) opposes the growth in size and scope of the 

6 Federal Government through the appointment of 

7 unconfirmed personnel to policymaking positions. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Scott W. Smith                                                                             |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Scott      W. Smith                                                                                 |   |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer)  November      4, 2009 |   |

----
# \. .. .



# . OF
,

_ ’ - :

: \. 

## Pact t!2at cm @i3i& OS thrr 

# D?p2r’hmlt

hm txxaPcndCP- -. - . ?Q

.

## _. . .- _.. : l . .,. ,;.. . : . . ; i : : .~ .- i , . ‘ .
. / i .
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31544-31545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15700]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CA-990-0777-68]


Relocation/Change of Address/Office Closure; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 31545]]

SUMMARY: On June 27, 1996, the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) 
California State Office will move to a new location. This notice 
provides information regarding that move.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 20, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Lou West, BLM California State 
Office (CA-912), 2800 Cottage Way, Room E-2845, Sacramento, California 
95825-1889; telephone number 916-979-2835.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Beginning on June 27, 1996, BLM's California 
State Office will be moving to a new location. The move will affect the 
following activities or considerations as follows:

(A). Public Access to Records

    During the period of June 17 through July 10, 1996, none of the 
records maintained by that office will be available for public 
inspection. However, the Public Room will remain open during the move 
to provide the following limited services: (1) Provide general or 
recreational information, (2) Distribute forms for mining claim 
maintenance fee/waiver filing, (3) Process maintenance fees for 
existing mining claims, (4) Process new mining claim locations, and (5) 
Sell maps. It is anticipated that the entire office will be 
operational, at the new location, on July 15, 1996.

(B). New Street Address and New Mailing Address

2135 Butano Drive, Sacramento, California 95825-0451; please address 
all correspondence to the new address after July 15, 1996.

(C). Telephone Numbers

    Existing telephone numbers will remain unchanged after the move.

    Dated: June 13, 1996.
Ronald R. Fox,
Deputy State Director, Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-15700 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P