KEN PAXTON 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

The Honorable Paul Bettencourt 

Chair, Select Committee on Property 

Tax Reform 

Texas State Senate 

Post Office Box 12068 

Austin, Texas 78711-2068 

Dear Senator Bettencourt: 

January 17, 2018 

Opinion No. KP-0177 

Re: Restrictions on the use of a school 

district's public funds to provide transportation 

to and from polling places and for political 

communications for or against a particular 

measure or candidate (RQ-020 I-KP) 

You ask two questions related to the authority of a school district to spend public funds to 

promote voting among students and employees within the school district. 1 As background, you 

explain "that several Texas independent school districts recently adopted a resolution purportedly 

designed to create a culture of voting" in the districts.2 Request Letter at 1. You raise concerns 

about certain portions of these resolutions, particularly those portions that "espouse a political 

perspective on education," and ask whether the district may use public funds to implement them. 

Id. at 1, 4. 

You first ask whether a school district may use public funds to provide transportation for 

employees or students to and from polling places. Id. at 4. You explain that the resolution adopted 

by some school districts includes the following provision: · 

That the Board of Trustees of ISD authorizes the 

administration to , take steps necessary to ensure maximum 

participation by District employees and eligible students in the 

elections process, which may include: ... Where feasible, providing 

District transportation to and from polling places .... 

Id. at 2. You ask whether a district rriay use "taxpayer-funded transportation" in this way. Id. 

Independent school district boards possess only those powers expressly conferred by law 

or necessarily implied from the powers conferred. Stout v. Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist., 733 

1Letter from Honorable Paul Bettencourt, Chair, Senate Select Comm. on Prop. Tax Reform, to Honorable 

Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen at 4 (Dec. 12, 2017), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-foropinions-rqs ("Request Letter"). 

2You indicate that "the resolution can be found at http://texaseducatorsvote.com/." Id. at 1. 
The Honorable Paul Bettencourt - Page 2 (KP-0177) 

S.W.2d 290,296 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1987, writ refd n.r.e.) (explaining that "a school district ... 

exercises only such powers as are delegated to it by the state"). The Legislature has given school 

district boards "the exclusive power and duty to govern and oversee the management of the public 

schools of the district." TEX. EDUC. CODE§ 11.151(b). Furthermore, the Legislature provided that 

"[l]ocal school funds ... may be used for ... purposes necessary in the conduct of the public 

schools determined by the board of trustees." Id.§ 45.105(c). That said, school districts must 

abide by any statutory or constitutional restraints on their spending of public funds. Relevant to 

your request, the Texas Constitution prohibits a political subdivision of the State from granting 

"public money or thing of value in aid of, or to any individual ... whatsoever." TEX. CONST. art 

III, § 52(a); see also id. § 51 (likewise prohibiting the Legislature from authorizing a grant of 

public money to an individual). Article III, section 52(a), prevents the gratuitous grant of public 

funds to any individual. Edgewood Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Meno, 917 S.W.2d 717, 740 (Tex. 1995). 

"A transfer of funds for a public purpose, with a clear public benefit received in return, does not 

amount to a lending of credit or grant of public funds in violation of article III, sections 51 and 

52." Id. To answer your question, we must therefore analyze whether providing transportation 

for employees or students to and from polling places serves a public purpose of a school district. 

We first address the provision of transportation for students to and from pollirig places. 

The Legislature expressly directed public schools to prepare "students to be thoughtful, active 

citizens." TEX. EDUC. CODE§ 4.00l(b) (outlining the overall objectives of public education); see 

also id. § 11.002 (providing that school districts "have the primary responsibility for implementing 

the state's system of public education"). School districts must offer a required curriculum in 

government. Id. § 28.002(a)(l)(D). Pursuant to this requirement, the State Board of Education 

implemented regulations requiring that high school students "understand the responsibilities, 

duties, and obligations of citizenship such as being well informed about ... voting," as well as 

understand "the voter registration process and the criteria for voting in elections." 19 TEX. ADMIN. 

CODE § l 13.44(c)(14)(C)-(D); see also TEX. EDUC. CODE § 28.002(c) (requiring the Board to 

identify essential knowledge and skills and requiring each district to provide instruction in them at 

appropriate grade levels).3 Thus, the Legislature and the State Board of Education have expressly 

directed school districts to promote voter education among the students of a school district. 

However, absent an educational purpose in providing students transportation to the polling 

locations, a court would likely conclude that the transportation serves no public purpose of the 

school district and therefore violates article III, section 52(a) of the Texas Constitution.4 

31n addition, high school principals must serve as deputy voter registrars and on multiple occasions 

throughout the year "distribute an officially prescribed registration application form to each student who is or will be 

18 years of age or older during that year." TEX. ELEC. CODE§ 13.046(a), (d). The Secretary of State implemented 

rules requiring the principal to review the applications for completeness and allowing the principal to assist in 

completing the forms. l TEX. ADMIN. CODE§ 81.7(d)(2)(C)(i)-(ii). 

4Briefing submitted in response to the opinion request suggests that a school district could decide to transport 

students to a local polling place for something akin to a field trip. See Letter from Barry Haenisch, Exec. Dir., Tex. 

Ass'n of Cmty. Schs. at 5 (Jan. 4, 2018). However, section 61.001 of the Election Code, titled "Bystanders 

Excluded," expressly prohibits a person from being in a polling place except as permitted by the Election Code. TEX. 

ELEC. CODE§ 61.00l(a). The Election Code makes no provision.for student observers, and a school district would 

have no authority to provide educational instruction inside a polling location while voting takes place. 
The Honorable Paul Bettencourt - Page 3 (KP-0177) 

We separately consider the provision of transportation for employees of the school district 

to and from polling places. A school district may provide for any employee travel expenses that 

are necessary in the conduct of the public schools. See TEX. EDUC. CODE §45.105(c); see Tex. 

Att'y Gen. Op. No. H-133 (1973) at 4 (recognizing that payment of school district trustee travel 

expenses may or may not be authorized under the law, depending on whether they are "necessary 

in the conduct of the public schools"). However, absent the performance of some educational 

function on behalf of the district's students, we question whether providing transportation for 

employees to and from polling places serves a public purpose of the school district. See Tex. Mun. 

League Intergov 'ti Risk Pool v. Tex. Workers' Comp. Comm 'n, 74 S.W.3d 377, 384 (Tex. 2002) 

( explaining that the predominant purpose of an expenditure of public funds must serve a public 

purpose, not benefit private parties). A prior opinion of this _office concluded that a school district 

could not fund travel expenses "of persons who have no responsibilities or duties to perform" on 

behalf of the school district. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. MW-93 (1979) at 2 (addressing a school 

board's authority to pay travel expenses of the spouse of a trustee). If a school district employee 

has no responsibility or duty to perform on behalf of the school district at the polling location, a 

court would likely conclude that a school district's funding of transportation for that individual to 

the polling location serves no public purpose of the school district and violates article III, section 

52(a) of the Texas Constitution. 

You also ask "[ w ]hat legal constraints exist regarding a school district's ability to spend or 

authorize the spending of public funds for political advertising or communications designed to 

influence voters to vote for or against a particular measure or candidate." Request Letter at 4. 

Two separate provisions prohibit a school district from supporting a candidate or measure in an 

election. Section 11.169 of the Education Code provides: 

Notwithstanding any other law, the board of trustees of an 

independent school district may not use state or local funds or other 

resources of the district to electioneer for or against any candidate, 

measure, or political party. 

TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.169. The Education Code does not define the term "electioneer." A 

common understanding of the term is "to work for the election of a candidate or party." MERRIAMWEBSTER'S COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY 400 (11th ed. 2005); see also TEX. ELEC. CODE 

§ 85.036(±)(2) (defining "electioneering" for purposes of a specific Election Code provision to 

include "the posting, use, or distribution of political signs or literature"). Thus, the Legislature 

prohibited a board of trustees of a school district from using public funds to work for a particular 

measure or candidate. 

In addition, subsection 255.003(a) of the Election Code provides: "An officer or employee 

of a political subdivision may not knowingly spend or authorize the spending of public funds for 

political advertising." TEX. ELEc. CODE § 255.003(a). A school district is a political subdivision 

and is therefore subject to this provision. See id § 1.005(13) (defining "political subdivision" for 

purposes of the Election Code to include counties, cities, and school districts). The Legislature 

defined "political advertising" as: 
The Honorable Paul Bettencourt - Page 4 (KP-0177) 

a communication supporting or opposing a candidate for nomination 

or election to a public office or office of a political party, a political 

party, a public officer, or a measure that: 

(A) in return for consideration, is published in a newspaper, magazine, or other 

periodical or is broadcast by radio or television; or 

(B) appears: 

(i) in a pamphlet, circular, flier, billboard, or other sign, bumper sticker, or 

similar form of written communication; or 

(ii) on an Internet website. 

Id § 251.001(16). A person who violates section 255.003(a) of the Election Code commits a Class 

A misdemeanor. Id. § 255.003(c).5 While no reported court cases construe this provision, the 

Texas Ethics Commission addressed the application of this statute to two factual scenarios 

involving school districts. In Ethics Advisory Opinion No. 45, the Commission concluded that 

section 255.003 prohibits distributing political advertising using school district employees on 

school district time or with school district equipment. See Tex. Ethics Comm'n Op. No. 45 (1992). 

Similarly, the Commission concluded that placing political advertising in a teachers' lounge would 

involve spending public funds in violation of section 255.003. See Tex. Ethics Comm'n Op. No. 

443 (2002). Thus, in addition to prohibiting the actual publishing of political advertising, 

subsection 255.003(a) prohibits the use of school district staff, facilities, or other resources to 

advertise for or against a candidate or measure. 

You indicate that the resolution adopted by several school districts "links to other websites 

that are partisan in nature." Request Letter at 1. We see no significant distinction between 

distribution of political advertising in a teachers' lounge and distribution electronically through 

e-mail or an Internet website. Thus, a court would likely conclude that the use of public funds to 

link to an Internet website promoting a specific candidate or measure is itself a communication 

supporting or opposing a candidate or measure in violation of section 11.169 of the Education 

Code and subsection 255.003(a) of the Election Code. 

5It is an "affirmative defense to prosecution ... that an officer or employee of a political subdivision 

reasonably relied on a court order or an interpretation of this section in a written opinion issued by: (I) a court of 

record; (2) the attorney general; or (3) the [Texas Ethics Commission]." TEX. ELEC. CODE§ 255.003(d). 
The Honorable Paul Bettencourt - Page 5 (KP-0177) 

SUMMARY 

Absent an educational purpose in providing students 

transportation to the polling locations, a court would likely conclude 

that the transportation serves no public purpose of the school district 

and therefore violates article III, section 52(a) of the Texas 

Constitution. 

If a school district employee has no responsibility or duty to 

perform on behalf of the school district at the polling location, a 

court would likely conclude that a school district's funding of 

transportation to the polling location for that individual serves no 

public purpose of the school district and therefore violates article III, 

section 52(a) of the Texas Constitution. 

Section 11.169 of the Education Code prohibits a board of 

trustees of a school district from using public funds to work for a 

particular measure or candidate. In addition, subsection 255.003(a) 

of the Election Code makes it a criminal offense for an officer or 

employee of a school district to knowingly spend or authorize the 

spending· of public funds for political advertising. A court would 

likely conclude that the use of public funds to link to an Internet 

website promoting a specific candidate or measure is itself a 

communication supporting or opposing a candidate or measure in 

violation of this provision. 

JEFFREY C. MATEER 

First Assistant Attorney General 

BRANTLEY STARR 

Deputy First Assistant Attorney General 

VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER 

Chair, Opinion Committee 

Very truly yours, 

KEN PAXTON 

Attorney General of Texas