alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I N T H E S U P R E M E C O U R T

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 181

Jaime Urrabazo, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20240085

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the 

Honorable Stephannie N. Stiel, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.

Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and 

appellee; on brief.
1

Urrabazo v. State

No. 20240085

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Jaime Urrabazo appeals from an order denying his application for 

postconviction relief after pleading guilty to unlawful possession of drug 

paraphernalia, second offense. At the evidentiary hearing on his application, he 

alleged he was under the influence of drugs when he pled guilty and claims he 

did not make a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to trial. The court 

found Urrabazo’s testimony was not credible and he failed to establish 

withdrawal of his guilty plea was necessary to correct a manifest injustice.

[¶2] “The [district] court has discretion in finding whether a manifest injustice 

necessitating the withdrawal of a guilty plea exists, and we review the court's 

decision for abuse of discretion.” State v. Rangel, 2024 ND 96, ¶ 6, 6 N.W.3d 860 

(citation omitted). Findings of fact made in a postconviction relief proceeding are 

subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Urrabazo v. State, 2024 ND 

67, ¶ 6, 5 N.W.3d 521. After a review of the record, we conclude the district 

court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and the court did not abuse its 

discretion by not allowing Urrabazo to withdraw his guilty plea. We summarily 

affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. 

Daniel J. Crothers 

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-41362 , 333-60162, 333-64974, 333-86958 and 333-111651 ofI-many, Inc and subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-68924, 333-76716, 333-85044, 333-88714 and 333-105088 of the Company, on Form S-3 of our report dated March 15, 2004, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the application of procedures relating tocertain disclosures and reclassifications of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 financial statements that were audited by other auditors who had ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assuranceother than with respect to such disclosures and reclassifications) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 15, 2004
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Silface, Gala, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered July 14, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Silface, Gala v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2014-2172 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 03, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6875

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.
HYGINUS IKECHUKWU ILODI, a/k/a Ike Ilodi,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:90-cr-00483-CCB-3)

Submitted: August 24, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hyginus Ikechukwu Ilodi, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM:
Hyginus Ikechukwu Ilodi appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a

motion for sentence reduction under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b).
Ilodi was originally sentenced to 262 months’ imprisonment
following convictions after a jury trial for conspiracy to
import heroin, conspiracy to distribute and possess with the
intent to distribute heroin, and importation of heroin. During
the pendency of this appeal, Ilodi was released from
imprisonment. Because Ilodi is no longer serving the 262-month
sentence originally imposed, his appeal is dismissed as moot. *

We also deny Ilodi’s motions for stay pending appeal and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* In any event, we find no error in the district court’s denial of Ilodi’s motion to compel the Government to file a Rule 35(b) motion.
EXHIBIT 32.2





NET TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 of Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,   as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Guillermo RodriguezGuillermo RodriguezChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date: August 15, 2011
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 15, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 15, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0468. ANTHONY S. TRICOLI v. ROB WATTS et al.. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 14CV4911
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 10, 2019

No. 04-19-00221-CV

Tommy Lee BROWN, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

Sandra Ann BROWN,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI06544

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on June 7, 2019. The appellant’s first 

motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to July 8, 

2019. On July 8, 2019, the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to 

file the brief until August 7, 2019, for a total extension of sixty days. The motion is GRANTED. 

THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE 

GRANTED. The Appellant’s brief must be filed by August 7, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of July, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 850 

Supporting the establishment and full funding of a staff exchange program 

between the House of Representatives and the Parliament of Ukraine, 

the Verkhovna Rada, as soon as possible. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Ms. KAPTUR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the establishment and full funding of a staff 

exchange program between the House of Representatives 

and the Parliament of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, 

as soon as possible. 

Whereas supporters of democracy worldwide recognize the 

valor of the people of Ukraine in seeking to advance 

democratic governance in their country; 

Whereas the role of the Parliament of Ukraine, the 

Verkhovna Rada, is essential to ensuring democratic governance and a balance of power among the branches of 

the Government of Ukraine; 

Whereas the people of the United States affirm the positive 

role being played by the Parliament of Ukraine in averting a constitutional crisis in that transitional republic; 


bajohnson on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 850 IH 

Whereas, on November 30, 1999, the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives signed an agreement with the leaders 

of the Parliament of Ukraine to establish an interparliamentary exchange program between the two legislative bodies; 

Whereas Members of the House of Representatives and the 

Parliament of Ukraine have already participated in video 

teleconferences as part of this agreement; and 

Whereas the House of Representatives has commended these 

historic efforts and expressed its desire and willingness to 

build on the success of this agreement: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the establishment and full funding of a staff exchange pro3 gram between the House of Representatives and the Par4 liament of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, as soon as pos5 sible. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




FORM OF AMENDED AND RESTATED AWARD AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED AWARD AGREEMENT is entered into as of this 12th day of February,
2009 by and between Lawson Products, Inc. (“Lawson”) and                     (“Participant”).



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Lawson (the
“Committee”) has selected Participant to receive an award under the Long-Term Capital
Accumulation Plan of Lawson (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, Participant wishes to accept that award, subject to the terms and conditions of the
Plan and this Agreement; and



     WHEREAS, in the event that Participant has previously received an award under the Plan, it is
the intention of Lawson and Participant that this Agreement shall memorialize and govern all awards
made to Participant under the Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, Lawson and Participant hereby agree as follows:



     1. The award evidenced by this Agreement (the “Award”) consists of                      (___) Shareholder
Value Appreciation Rights (“SVARs”) with an effective date of February 12, 2009. This
Agreement supersedes and replaces all previous oral or written communications between Lawson and
Participant about any award to Participant under the Plan, including but not limited to any prior
award agreement.



     2. All aspects of the SVARs evidenced by this Agreement (including but not limited to vesting,
valuation, payment and possible forfeiture) shall be governed by this Agreement and by the Plan, a
copy of which has been provided to Participant and is hereby acknowledged by Participant, and the
terms and conditions of which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference.



     3. Without limiting the scope of Section 2, above, Participant acknowledges that:



     (a) As a condition to retaining the SVARs constituting the Award, Participant shall be
required to enter into an employment agreement with Lawson including confidentiality and other
restrictive covenants, as described in Section 14 of the Plan;



     (b) Any amount that would otherwise be payable to Participant or his/her beneficiaries with
respect to the SVARs constituting the Award shall be subject to reduction in accordance with
Section 13 of the Plan as a result of the special excise tax rules described in Section 13 of the
Plan; and



     (c) The Committee may amend or terminate any or all of the provisions of the Plan and any or
all of the provisions this Agreement in accordance with Section 24 of the Plan.




1









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Participant and Lawson have executed this Agreement as of the date set
forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Participant	 	 







2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 9, 2021

No. 04-21-00430-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and James M. Bass,

Appellants

v.

ROBERT DIXON TIPS PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI10003

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was originally due on November 8, 2021. On November 5, 2021, 

appellants filed a motion requesting an extension of their briefing deadline until December 8, 

2021. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants to file their brief by 

December 8, 2021.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Willie F. Williams, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company,

Defendant.

No. CV-18-00061-TUC-DCB

ORDER 

The parties having notified the Court that a settlement has been reached in this 

matter, contingent on the Court granting the parties’ Stipulation and Request to Vacate and 

Seal Certain Orders (Docs. 22 and 33). The Court finds good cause to grant the Stipulation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation (Doc. 57), the Court directs the 

Clerk of the Court to VACATE AND SEAL Order (Doc. 22) and Order (Doc. 33).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, having been notified that this case is settled, 

the case is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall close it.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file the appropriate dismissal 

documents within 30 days of the filing of this Order.

/////

/////

/////

/////
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction over this matter 

to reopen the case and return it to the Court's active docket, in the event problems arise in 

relation to its settlement.

Dated this 24th day of February, 2020.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30264-30265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15109]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-13596]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Disc Graphics, Inc., Common Stock, $.01 Par Value)

June 10, 1996.
    Disc Graphics, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, its Board of Directors unanimously 
approved resolutions on December 14, 1995 to withdraw the Security from 
listing on the Amex and instead, to list the Security on the Nasdaq 
National Market (``NNM'').
    The decision of the Board followed a thorough study of the matter 
and was based upon the belief that listing the Security on the NNM will 
be more beneficial to the Company's

[[Page 30265]]

stockholders than the present listing on the Amex because trading firms 
are reluctant to trade or market securities listed on the Amex and that 
this has been a factor in the thin volume and lack of interest in the 
Company's Security. Also, because firms have not been interested in 
trading the Company's Security, it has been difficult to obtain 
research coverage for the Company. As a result, it is the Board's 
belief that the Company's investors have not been as well served by an 
Amex listing as they are likely to be by a NNM listing.
    Any interested person may, on or before July 1, 1996 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15109 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 35 94

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Xiao y on g An O'Neal

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.

Nan cy A. Berryhil l, Acti ng Co m m is si on er o f So ci al Secu rit y ; SS A Offic e o f 1 Gen eral Co un se l

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - C ap e Gir ard eau

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Ju ne 29 , 20 17 Fi le d: Ju ly 6, 20 17 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __
PER CURI AM.

Nan cy A. Berr y hi ll h a s be en ap po in te d to se rv e as Acti ng Co m m is si on er of 1 So ci al Secu rit y , an d is su bs ti tu te d as ap pe ll ee pu rs ua nt to Fed eral Ru le of App el la te Pro ced ur e 4 3( c).Xiao y on g An O’Neal ap pe al s an or de r of th e di st ric t co ur t affi rm in g th e 2 Co m m is si on er’s de ni al of su pp le m en ta l se cu rit y in co m e (SSI ) fo ll owi ng a he ari ng be fo re an ad m in is tra ti ve la w jud ge ( A LJ )

. O ’Neal arg ue s th at th e ALJ erre d in de te rm in in g th at sh e is fin an ci al ly in el ig ib le to rece iv e SSI be ne fit s be cau se sh e is a si ng le in di vi du al wit h “ co un ta bl e res ou rces ” in ex ces s of th e st at ut or y $2 ,00 0 li m it

. Se e 42 U.S.C. § 13 82 (a); 20 C.F.R. § 41 6.1 20 1. Hav in g juri sd ic ti on un de r 28 U.S.C. § 1 29 1, t hi s co ur t af

fir m s.

Fo ll owi ng de no vo r e v i e w , th is co ur t fin ds no le ga l erro r an d co nc lu de s th at

su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce in th e reco rd as a who le su pp or ts th e ALJ’s de te rm in at io n. Se e Dra pe r v. C ol vi n , 77 9 F .3d 55 6, 5 59 (8t h C ir. 2 01 5)

.

The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed

. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le E. Ri ch ard W eb be r, Uni te d St at e s D i st ric t Ju dg e fo r th e 2 East ern Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco mm e n d a ti on s of th e Hon or ab le Jo hn M. Bo de nh au se n, Uni te d S t a te s Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e East ern Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.

-2

-
Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC   Document 292-2   Filed 01/10/20   Page 1 of 4

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC   Document 292-2   Filed 01/10/20   Page 2 of 4

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC   Document 292-2   Filed 01/10/20   Page 3 of 4

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC   Document 292-2   Filed 01/10/20   Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CombiMatrixCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2010(the “Report”), I, Amit Kumar, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|     | By:                              |
|----------|----------------------------------|
|     |                             |
|     | /s/ AMIT KUMAR, PH.D.            |
|     | Amit Kumar, Ph.D.                |
|     | Chief Executive Officer          |
| * * | *(Principal  Executive Officer)* |
|     | May 17, 2010                |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Simon Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 13, 2012   /s/ Simon Thomas Simon Thomas Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.