alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1/32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cellular Accessories
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Clifford Chapman, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Clifford ChapmanName:
            Clifford
                ChapmanTitle:
            Chief
                Executive and Financial OfficerDate:
            May
                1, 2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SHANNON PATRICIA MULLINGS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2801

[ December 3, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Barbara R. Duffy , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17007773CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Breanna Atwood, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and Shannon Patricia Mullings, Royal Palm Beach, pro se, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acu ñ a, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, G ERBER and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1The HONORABLE STEPHEN M. REASONER, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4136

___________

Charles Edwin Davidson, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Paula Casey, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 7, 2001

 Filed: February 9, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Davidson appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his suit alleging

state and federal claims against several Arkansas public officials and private

individuals. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we

conclude Davidson did not state a claim pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and

Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962. Because Davidson asserted no other

basis for federal jurisdiction, we also conclude the district court did not abuse its
-2-

discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Davidson’s remaining

claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny all pending

motions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony J. CARTER, Appellant.

Nos. WD 51256, WD 53121.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 4, 1997.

James C. Cox, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant.

*72Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine N. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and SPINDEN and HOWARD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated appeal from conviction of tampering in the first degree, § 569.080.1(2), RSMo 1994, and from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for posteonviction relief.

Affirmed. Rules 80.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 19, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen L. Luey, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ KAREN L. LUEYKaren L. LueyChief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Executive Vice President


Date: May 23, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Gregory A. SCHER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John & Jane DOES 1-99, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 56827.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 22, 1990.

Gregory A. Scher, Farmington, for plaintiffs-appellants.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the denial of their petition for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We therefore affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-58210 and No. 333-58212) of OSCA, Inc. of our
report dated January 21, 2002 (except Note 18, as to which the date is February
20, 2002) with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
OSCA, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.

                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

February 26, 2002
Indianapolis, Indiana
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MINUTES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON 

U.S. Magistrate Judge: Bernardo P. Velasco Date: October 16, 2018 

USA v. Scott Daniel Warren Case Number: CR-18-00223-001-TUC-RCC (BPV)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Anna Wright and Nathaniel Jacob Walters

Attorney for Defendant: Gregory Kuykendall and Amy Knight, Retained 

Interpreter: N/A 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

MOTION HEARING: 

Matter is before the Court regarding the Motion for Discovery [Doc. 113] and Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 

115]. 

Parties first proceed on the Motion for Discovery. Mr. Kuykendall argues in support of the motion and 

shows a short video. The Court questions defense counsel as to the specific requests. Mr. Walters 

responds. The Court asks Mr. Walters questions as well. Mr. Kuykendall argues in rebuttal. 

Parties next proceed on the Motion to Dismiss (International Law). Ms. Knight argues in support of the 

motion. The Court asks questions of Ms. Knight. Ms. Wright responds. The Court questions counsel. 

Ms. Knight argues in rebuttal and responds to further questions from the Court. 

The Court takes both Motions [Docs. 113 & 115] under advisement. 

Court Reporter: Cindy Shearman 

Deputy Clerk Sara Jones 

Mtn Hrg 1 hr 26 min 

Start: 1:34 pm 

Stop: 3:00 pm 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 130 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 1
[Cite as State v. Cox, 2012-Ohio-3280.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO : 

Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 24788 

vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 10CR1193 

JAMES COX : (Criminal Appeal from 

 Common Pleas Court) 

Defendant-Appellant : 

 . . . . . . . . . 

 O P I N I O N

 Rendered on the 20th day of July, 2012. 

 . . . . . . . . . 

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Pros. Attorney; Michele D. Phipps, Asst. Pros. Attorney, Atty. 

Reg. No. 0069829, P.O. Box 972, Dayton, OH 45422 

Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellee 

Lori R. Cicero, Atty. Reg. No. 0079508, 500 East Fifth Street, Dayton, OH 45402 

Attorney for Defendant-Appellant 

 . . . . . . . . . 

GRADY, P.J.: 

{¶ 1} Defendant James Cox appeals from a final order revoking his judicial release. 

{¶ 2} In July 2010, Defendant was convicted of arson, R.C. 2909.03(A)(1), a felony 

of the fourth degree, and possession of criminal tools, R.C. 2923.24(A), a felony of the fifth 

degree. He was sentenced to one year in prison. Defendant filed a motion for judicial 
release, which the trial court granted in January 2011. 

{¶ 3} Several months later, Defendant was arrested for violation of a protection 

order. Defendant’s probation officer filed a notice of revocation of Defendant’s judicial 

release. Following a hearing, the trial court found Defendant in violation of the terms of his 

judicial release and ordered him to serve the remainder of his prison sentence. 

{¶ 4} Defendant appeals raising the following assignment of error: 

“THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED PREJUDICIAL ERROR AND ABUSED ITS 

DISCRETION IN REVOKING THE PROBATION OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.” 

{¶ 5} When Defendant’s judicial release was revoked in July 2011, he had 

approximately seventy-five days remaining on his sentence. We take judicial notice that 

Defendant’s name does not appear on the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction 

website and that he appears to have served the remainder of his sentence. State v. Silvers, 

Clark No. 2005CA 18, 2006-Ohio-3129, ¶ 7. 

{¶ 6} We have previously held that when a defendant has completed his sentence, 

“we cannot provide him any meaningful relief as to his prison term.” State v. Jennings, 2d 

Dist. Montgomery 24599, 2012-Ohio-1229, ¶ 7. Therefore, we concluded in Jennings that 

the defendant’s assignments of error that related to the trial court’s finding that he had 

violated the terms of his community control were moot and held no arguable merit. Id. The 

same principle applies here, where Defendant was found to have violated the terms of his 

judicial release. 

{¶ 7} Accordingly, Defendant’s sole assignment of error is overruled as moot. The 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 
3

FROELICH, J., And HALL, J., concur. 

Copies mailed to: 

Michele D. Phipps, Esq. 

Lori R. Cicero, Esq. 

Hon. Frances E. McGee
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 11, 2010   /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15090]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), announcement is made of the 
following National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of 
July 1996:

    Name: Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality.
    Date and Time: July 11-12, 1996, 9:00 a.m.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: Topics that will be discussed include: Updates on the 
Healthy Start Program, Evaluation, and Media Campaign; Early 
Postpartum Discharge; and the Department's Pregnancy Prevention 
Program.
    Anyone requiring information regarding the Committee should 
contact Dr. Peter van Dyck, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee 
on Infant Mortality, Health Resources and Services Administration, 
Room 18-31, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, 
Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 443-2204.
    Persons interested in attending any portion of the meeting or 
having questions regarding the meeting should contact Ms. Kerry P. 
Nesseler, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and 
Services Administration, Telephone (301) 443-2204.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: June 10, 1996.
Jackie E. Baum,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, HRSA.
[FR Doc. 96-15090 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT EDGAR R AUL M AR TINEZB ARR IENTOS, a .k.a . Edga r R a ul M artine z , Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-73570 Age n c y No. A040-197-600 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Edga r R a u l M artine z -B arrie ntos, a native and c itiz e n of Gua t e m a la , pe titions for re vie w of a

n orde r of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls (“ B IA” ) dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ions for 

# FIL ED

MAY28 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l a

nd wa ive rs of ina dm issibility unde r se c tion 212(h) a

nd form e r se c tion 212(c ) of the Im m igration a

nd Na tiona lity Ac t. W e dism iss the pe tition for re vie w. W e la c k jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a )(2)(B )(i) to re vie w the B IA’ s de te rm i nation tha

t M artine z -B arrie ntos did not m e rit re l ie f from

re m ova l a s a m a tte r of disc re tion. Se e Me ndoza v . Holde r , 623 F.3d 1299, 1302 (9th C ir. 2010) (se c tion 212(h) waive r); Be r mude z v . Holde r , 586 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ) (c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l); Palma-Rojas v . IN S , 244 F.3d 1191, 1192 (9th C ir. 2001) (pe r c uriam ) (form e r se c tion 212(c ) wa ive r). M a rtine z -B arrie ntos ra ise s no c olora

ble c onstitutiona

l c la im or que stion of la

w tha t would invoke

our jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a )(2)(D). Se e Be rmude z , 586 F.3d a

t 1169 (“ ‘ [A] ny c ha lle nge of [the B IA’ s] disc re tiona ry de te rm ination m

ust pre se nt a c olora ble c la im ’ in orde r for this c ourt to e xe rc ise jurisdic tion.” (c ita tion omitte d)); Me n de z-C astro v . Muk

a se y , 552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th C i r. 2009) (“ To be c olora ble in this c onte xt, . . . thec la im m ust ha ve som e possibleva lidity .” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D.

1 2 - 7 3 5 7 0 2
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0333

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF: P.Y., Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classifi ed for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Gregory R. Todd, District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2020

08/26/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0333
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14997]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Public Hearing in Maryland: Railroad Accident

    In connection with its investigation of the collision and 
derailment of a MARC commuter passenger train with AMTRAK Train 29, The 
Capitol Limited, near Silver Spring, Maryland, on February 16, 1996, 
the National Transportation Safety Board will convene a public hearing 
at 9:00 a.m. (local time), on June 26, 1996, at the DoubleTree Hotel, 
1750 Rockville Pike (Route 355), Rockville, Maryland 20852. For more 
information, contact Pat Cariseo, Office of Public Affairs, Washington, 
D.C. 20594, telephone (202) 382-0660.

    Dated: June 7, 1996.
Bea Hardesty,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-14997 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  TrueYou.Com,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John Higgins,  President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,
to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

Date:  February 21, 2006
                                    /s/ John Higgins
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    John Higgins
                                    President


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 1350 has been
provided to  TrueYou.Com,  Inc.  and will be retained by  TrueYou.Com,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 691 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 99
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 691

                          [Report No. 111-235]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2749) to amend the 
 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the safety of food in 
               the global market, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2009

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2749) to amend the 
 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the safety of food in 
               the global market, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2749) to amend the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the safety of food in 
the global market, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 
rule XXI. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the 
bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report 
of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; 
and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                  House Calendar No. 99

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 691

                          [Report No. 111-235]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2749) to amend the 
 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the safety of food in 
               the global market, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 29, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```