alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 727 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer Awareness 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. 

ISSA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the deadliest of all gynecological 

cancers, and the reported mortality of ovarian cancer is 

increasing over time; 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the 5th leading cause of cancer 

deaths among women in the United States; 

Whereas the mortality rate for ovarian cancer has not significantly decreased in the almost 40 years since the ‘‘War 

on Cancer’’ was declared; 

Whereas all women are at risk for ovarian cancer, and 90 

percent of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer do not 

have a family history that puts them at higher risk; 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 727 IH 

Whereas the Pap test is sensitive and specific to the early detection of cervical cancer, but not to ovarian cancer; 

Whereas there is currently no reliable early detection test for 

ovarian cancer; 

Whereas many people are unaware that the symptoms of 

ovarian cancer often include bloating, pelvic or abdominal 

pain, difficulty eating or feeling full quickly, and urinary 

symptoms, among several other symptoms that are easily 

confused with other diseases; 

Whereas the first national consensus statement on ovarian 

cancer symptoms was developed in June 2007 to provide 

consistency in describing symptoms to make it easier for 

women to learn and remember them; 

Whereas due to the lack of a reliable screening test, 75 percent of ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in an advanced stage when the five-year survival rate is below 45 

percent; 

Whereas if ovarian cancer is diagnosed and treated at an 

early stage before the cancer spreads outside of the 

ovary, the survival rate is as high as 90 percent; 

Whereas there are factors that are known to reduce the risk 

for ovarian cancer and play an important role in the prevention of the disease; 

Whereas awareness and early recognition of ovarian cancer 

symptoms are currently the best way to save women’s 

lives; 

Whereas the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance, during the 

month of September, holds a number of events to increase public awareness of ovarian cancer; and 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 727 IH 

Whereas a National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month should 

be designated to increase the awareness of the public regarding the cancer: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer Aware3 ness Month. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN DONAHUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 237 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14807]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[PA 52-2-7155; FRL-5506-9]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Pennsylvania; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is reopening the comment period for a proposed rule 
published on April 9, 1996 (61 FR 15744). In the April 9, 1996 notice, 
EPA proposed to approve a reasonably available control technology 
(RACT) requirements for 21 Pennsylvania sources of volatile organic 
compounds (VOCs) or nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>X). At the request of the 
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, EPA is 
reopening the comment period through June 10, 1996, only as it pertains 
to the RACT determinations for Pennsylvania Power--New Castle plant and 
International Paper--Hammermill Division. All comments received on or 
before June 10, 1996, including those received between the close of the 
comment period on May 9 and the publication of this notice, will be 
entered into the public record and considered by EPA before taking 
final action on the proposed rule.

DATES: Comments are now due on or before June 28, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Kathleen Henry, Acting Chief, 
Ozone and Mobile Sources Section, Mailcode 3AT21, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19107. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the 
Air, Radiation, and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
19107; and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau 
of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, 
Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia H. Stahl at the U.S. EPA Region III address above, (215) 597-
9337, or after May 20, 1996, (215) 566-2180, or via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3c0c7d2dbdf9dd0caddc7dbdad2f3d6c3d2ded2dadf9dd6c3d29dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a797e6b6266246973647e62636b4a6f7a6b676b6366246f7a6b246d657c">[email protected]</span></a> pertaining to the reopening of the 
comment period for the Pennsylvania Power--New Castle and International 
Paper--Hammermill RACT determinations.

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Stanley Laskowski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 96-14807 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28257-28258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13912]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

May 22, 1996.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special request: In order to complete the two stages of the 
assessment test described below June and August 1996, the Department of 
Treasury is requesting that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
review and approve this information collection by June 4, 1996. To 
obtain a copy of this survey, please contact the IRS Clearance Officer 
at the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1349.
    Project Number: SOI-16.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1996 Business Master File Telefile Script Usability 
Assessment Test.
    Description: There are several purposes of the BMF TeleFile 
usability

[[Page 28258]]

assessment test: (1) To gather preliminary information about the 
comprehensibility and organization of the BMF TeleFile scripts; (2) to 
obtain reactions and opinions of subject using the system; and to 
assess the usability of two different BMF TeleFile forms.
    The results from this study will allow the IRS to improve the BMF 
TeleFile system, consequently making it easier for businesses to use.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 32.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 32 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13912 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF BILL SCHAEFER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT  CERTIFICATION  I, Bill Schaefer, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A  of Legends Business Group, Inc.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Legends Business Group, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Legends Business Group, Inc. and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Legend Business Group, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of Legends Business Groups disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in Legends Business Groups internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Legends Business Groups most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Legends Business Groups internal control over financial reporting; and  5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Legends Business Groups auditors and of Legends Business Groups board of directors:  (a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Legends Business Groups ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Legends Business Groups internal control over financial reporting.  Date: December 18, 2013  By: /s/ Bill SchaeferBill SchaeferChief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29049-29050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14376]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29050]]


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service


Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee will meet on June 17, 
1996, at the Robert Duncan Plaza Building, 333 SW First Ave., Portland, 
Oregon 97208 in Rooms 3A and 3B on the 3rd floor. The purpose of the 
meeting is to continue discussions to identify issues and solutions to 
improve the implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan (NFP) and in 
particular to focus on better ways to integrate the ecological and 
economic aspects of the NFP. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. on 
June 17 and continue until 5:00 p.m. Agenda items to be discussed 
include, but are not limited to: (1) issues which impede the efficient 
implementation of the NFP, (2) recommendations to resolve the issues, 
and (3) identification of procedures to implement recommendations. The 
IAC meeting will be open to the public and is fully accessible for 
people with disabilities. Interpreters are available upon request in 
advance. Written comments may be submitted for the record at the 
meeting. Time will also be scheduled for oral public comments. 
Interested persons are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this meeting may be directed to Don Knowles, 
Executive Director, Regional Ecosystem Office, 333 SW 1st Avenue, P.O. 
Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (Phone: 503-326-6265).

    Dated: May 29, 1996.
Donald R. Knowles,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 96-14376 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

GRIN ARKANIT,

Appellant.

No. 84349-4-I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM. Grin Arkanit appeals a trial court order denying his motion 

for post-conviction DNA testing pursuant to RCW 10.73.170. His court-appointed 

attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a 

good faith argument on review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184, 

470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 

L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion to withdraw must:

[1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record 

that might arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counsel’s brief 

should be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise 

any points that he chooses; [4] the court—not counsel—then 

proceeds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide 

whether the case is wholly frivolous.

Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders, 386 U.S. at 744) (alterations in 

original).

This procedure has been followed. Arkanit’s counsel on appeal filed a 

brief with the motion to withdraw. Arkanit was served with a copy of the brief, 
No. 84349-4-I/2

-2-

and informed of his right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. 

Arkanit filed a statement of additional grounds.1 

The material facts are accurately set forth in counsel’s brief in support of 

the motion to withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and 

has independently reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered 

the following potential issues raised by counsel: whether the trial court violated 

Arkanit’s right to due process by denying his motion without a hearing, whether 

the trial court erred by denying Arkanit’s motion for post-conviction DNA testing, 

and whether the trial court erred by denying Arkanit’s motion for the appointment 

of counsel. The court also considered the following issues raised by Arkanit: 

whether the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for unlawful 

possession of a firearm in the second degree, and whether the trial court erred 

by not reading the jury instructions orally on the record.

The issues raised by counsel and by Arkanit are wholly frivolous. The 

motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

FOR THE COURT:

 1 Arkanit subsequently filed a motion for extension of time pursuant to RAP 18.8. The 

motion is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 408-409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-142]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-120-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

December 29, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1995, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, 
filed in the above docket a request for approval pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) and under its blanket authority 
issued on September 1, 1982, in Docket No. CP82-433, to construct and 
operate a new meter station and lateral to provide transportation 
deliveries for Eastern Energy Marketing (Eastern Energy) to a new 
cogeneration plant at Glenns Ferry, Idaho, all as more fully set forth 
in the request that is on file with 

[[Page 409]]
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, Northwest states that it proposes to construct, own, 
and operate the new Glenns Ferry Cogeneration Meter Station and Lateral 
at Milepost 756.652 on Northwest's Ignacio to Sumas mainline in Section 
29, Township 5 South, Range 10 East, Elmore County, Idaho. The new 
meter station will consist of two 3-inch taps, two 1-inch regulators, 
one 3-inch turbine meter and appurtenances with a maximum daily design 
capacity of approximately 3,267 Dth per day at 320 psig. The new 
lateral will consist of approximately 1,100 feet of 3-inch pipeline 
extending from the meter station to a new 10 megawatt cogeneration 
plant to be built by Glenns Ferry Cogeneration Partners, Ltd.
    Northwest further states that the estimated cost to construct the 
Glenns Ferry Cogeneration Meter Station and Lateral is estimated to 
cost approximately $298,100. Northwest indicates that, pursuant to a 
facilities agreement and the facilities reimbursement provisions of 
Northwest's tariff, Eastern Energy will reimburse Northwest for the 
actual costs associated with the construction of the meter station.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity is deemed to be authorized 
effective on the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-142 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATION  I, Henry Andrews, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, as amended, of TransAct Energy Corp. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  October 28, 2008  /s/ Henry Andrews Henry Andrews President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)