alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-21-00276-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

141st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 141-327449-21

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE JENNIFER TREGER, TODD DANIEL, AND KERRI REHMEYER, 

Relators
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ “Petition for Immediate Writ of Injunction”

and “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief Pending Determination of Petition for 

Writ of Injunction” and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, 

relators’ “Petition for Immediate Writ of Injunction” and “Emergency Motion for 

Temporary Relief Pending Determination of Petition for Writ of Injunction” are

denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 9, 2021
Ex.-31)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Mayer, certify that:

l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Structured Asset Mortgage
Investments Inc., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2000-1.

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Collateral Administrator and Securities
Administrator.

Bank of America, N.A., as Servicer
Cendant Mortgage Company, as Servicer
Chase Mortgage Company, as Servicer
CitiMortgage, Inc., as Servicer
Countrywide Mortgage Company, as Servicer
EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer
EverHome Mortgage Corporation (f/k/a Alliance Mortgage Company), as Servicer
GMAC Mortgage Company, as Servicer
SouthTrust Mortgage Company, as Servicer
Washington Mutual Bank, FA as Servicer
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., as Servicer


<PAGE>


Dated: March 26, 2004




                                 By: /s/ Jeffrey Mayer
                                    ---------------------------------
                                 Name:    Jeffrey Mayer
                                 Company: Structured Asset Mortgage
                                          Investments Inc.
                                 Title:   President

                                     - 10 -
#### Marie E. HANSON, Employee/Appellant, v. HUSSMAN CORPORATION, Employer/Respondent.

No. 68945.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 26, 1996.

Jerry L. Suddarth, O’Fallon, for appellant.

Karen A. Mulroy, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation ease, claimant appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision denying her compensation.

Her sole point contends that there was not competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that her injuries were the result of a private quarrel assault.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51149, Inc., for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51149, Inc. hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.      SuchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended July 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of 51149, Inc. 

 
| Dated: September 12, 2005 |
|---------------------------|

 

**51149, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/  Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000


<S>                                            <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUN-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                                3,295
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        71,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                            713
<INVENTORY>                                          49,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    137,022
<PP&E>                                              157,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                       46,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      263,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                89,944
<BONDS>                                             156,851
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                              25
<COMMON>                                                 60
<OTHER-SE>                                           14,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        263,747
<SALES>                                             265,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    265,399
<CGS>                                               223,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        45,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      1,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   17,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (22,376)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (9,043)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (13,333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (13,333)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (222)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (222)



</TABLE>
#### Jurrus, a Minor, *v.*The Toledo, Fostoria & Findlay Electric Ry. Co.

(No. 22535

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*254*Messrs. Deeds é Cole*and *Mr. Mark L. Leister,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Tyler, McMahon, Smith & Wilson, Mr. J. S. Bhinefort*and *Mr. Rush Niles,*for defendant in error.

By the Court.

The amended petition contains the averment that said defendant “carelessly, negligently, wilfully and wantonly” maintained an uninsulated wire eighteen inches to two feet above the ground on defendant’s right of way and over and across said pathway for a distance of approximately one thousand feet in each direction from said path and said culvert.

The trial court required the plaintiff below to elect whether he would proceed upon negligence or wantonness. Electing to proceed upon negligence, the plaintiff was deprived of the privilege of going to the jury upon the question of whether the defendant was guilty of wantonness in the manner of maintaining its high-tension wire, which would be the basis of plaintiff’s recovery if the boy was a trespasser; for even if he was a trespasser, the company owed him the duty not to wantonly injure him.

The charge confines the recovery, if any, to finding that the boy was strictly upon the so-called path as a licensee, and denies recovery if he was on the right of way outside the so-called path as a trespasser. While the amended petition avers the boy was' a *255pedestrian on the path, yet if the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of the path he might still show he was on the defendant’s right of way even as a trespasser, and the averments of the amended petition were sufficiently broad to allow a recovery as a trespasser if there was wantonness shown by the preponderance of the evidence in the manner of maintaining the wire on the defendant’s right of way, which proximately caused the boy’s injury.

The so-called two-issue rule was not applicable in the premises, for only one issue was submitted to the jury, to wit, the liability arising from simple negligence if the minor was a licensee. The other issue, that of wantonness, as claimed by the plaintiff in error to be shown by the circumstances and conditions surrounding the accident, and in the manner of maintaining its high-tension wire, applicable if the boy was only a trespasser, was not submitted to the jury.

•For error in requiring the election and because of the instruction that if the boy was a trespasser the company owed him no duty, the judgments of the courts below are reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

*Judgment reversed.*

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Aleen and Robinson, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Missouri, ex rel. Jo Ann BOSHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert DOTSON, Sheriff of Laclede County, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 19076.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

July 6, 1994.

Richard L. Anderson, Kimberling City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Craig A. Smith, Jeffrey L. Groves, Daniel, Clampett, Lilley, Dalton, Powell & Cunningham, Springfield, for defendant-respondent.

GARRISON, Judge.

Plaintiff, Jo Ann Boshers, filed suit against Defendant, Robert Dotson, Sheriff of Laclede County, Missouri, alleging that she was damaged when Defendant conducted a search on October 4, 1989. This appeal is from a summary judgment entered in favor of Defendant on the theory that he was protected by the doctrine of “official immunity.”

This appeal involves the same search and presents the same issues as those in *State ex rel. Donna Faye Boshers v. Robert Dotson, Sheriff of Laclede County,*879 S.W.2d 730 (Mo.App.S.D.1994), handed down currently herewith. We do, therefore, adopt the opinion in Case No. 19075 as the opinion for this ease and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FLANIGAN, P.J., and PREWITT, J., concur.
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Integral Systems, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 20th day of February, 2009 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Integral Systems, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and John B. Higginbotham (the
“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of July 9, 2008, as
amended by the First Amendment dated as of August 7, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive
wish to amend the Employment Agreement to (i) extend the period during which a change in control bonus is potentially payable pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Employment Agreement, and (ii) eliminate the golden parachute
“gross-up” provision in Section 7.4 of the Employment Agreement; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 

1. Section 3.5 is amended by replacing “18-month anniversary” with “30-month anniversary”. 
 2. Section 7.4 is deleted and replaced with “[Reserved]”. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Second Amendment as of the Amendment
Effective Date. 
  

									
	INTEGRAL SYSTEMS, INC.	 		 	JOHN B. HIGGINBOTHAM
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeffrey A. Rosolio
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ John B. Higginbotham

	Name:	 	Jeffrey A. Rosolio	 		 	Name:	 	John B. Higginbotham
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Administration, and Secretary	 		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and President
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (BPV) 

ORDER 

 The Court has reviewed the Reports and Recommendation filed by Magistrate 

Judge Velasco (Doc. 110) and (Doc. 134), the objections filed thereto and response filed 

on behalf of the Government. 

IT IS ORDERED the Court adopts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge 

and DENIES the Motion to Suppress (Doc. 53), and DENIES the Motion to Dismiss 

Indictment for Violation of International Law (Doc. 115). 

 Dated this 19th day of December, 2018.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 832 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 832

Recognizing and congratulating ACT, Inc. on 50 years of service to the 
                                Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 2009

 Mr. Loebsack (for himself, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Latham, Mr. King of Iowa, 
 and Mr. Braley of Iowa) submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and congratulating ACT, Inc. on 50 years of service to the 
                                Nation.

Whereas ACT, Inc., formerly known as American College Testing, is a not-for-
        profit entity dedicated to helping people achieve educational and 
        workplace success;
Whereas since its founding in 1959 in Iowa City, Iowa, ACT, Inc. has served this 
        mission for 50 years;
Whereas ACT has representatives from all 50 States participating in its State 
        organizations;
Whereas ACT conducts research on college and career readiness solutions to help 
        all students graduate high school ready for college and workforce 
        training programs; and
Whereas ACT is committed to bridging barriers that remain in accessing the 
        globalized marketplace: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates ACT, Inc. on 50 years of service to the 
        Nation; and
            (2) congratulates ACT employees, directors, and members of 
        State organizations for their dedication in providing 
        assistance to those in the Nation and around the world to 
        achieve educational and workforce success.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the periodic report of JMP Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph A. Jolson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 6, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Joseph A. Jolson
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Joseph A. Jolson       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



58
Exhibit 24.2

CERTIFIED RESOLUTIONS

Certified to be a true and correct copy of the resolutions
adopted by the Board of Directors of PMA Capital Corporation at a meeting held
on February 5, 2004, a quorum being present, and such resolutions are still in
full force and effect as of this date of certification, not having been amended,
modified or rescinded since the date of their adoption.

RESOLVED, that  the
Officers of the Company, and each of them, are hereby authorized to sign the  Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,  and any amendments
thereto, (the Form 10-K) in the name and on  behalf of the Company and as
attorneys for each of its Directors and Officers.

RESOLVED, that  each
Officer and Director of the Company who may be required to execute (whether  on behalf of
the Company or as an Officer or Director thereof) the Form 10-K, is  hereby authorized to
execute and deliver a power of attorney appointing such  person or persons named therein
as true and lawful attorneys and agents to  execute in the name, place and stead (in any
such capacity) of any such Officer  or Director the Form 10-K and to file any such power
of attorney together with  the Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the  seal of
the Company, this _____ day of March, 2004.

| | /s/ Charles A. Brawley, III    Charles A. Brawley, III    Assistant Secretary
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(SEAL)

---
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ J. Eric PikeJ. Eric PikeChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentFebruary 9, 2009/s/ Anthony K. SlaterAnthony K. SlaterChief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE IOMED,
INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      15,097,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,417,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,000
<INVENTORY>                                    767,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,322,000
<PP&E>                                       3,803,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,895,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,916,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,617,000
<BONDS>                                        586,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,881,000
<COMMON>                                    34,490,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (23,658,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,916,000
<SALES>                                     10,596,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,767,000
<CGS>                                        3,692,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,882,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (986,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,155,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,155,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,155,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
 1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 
 2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andthe results of operations of the Company. 

Date:    April 3, 2019 

 

(signed) Billy C. Duvall
Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and will beretained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933. 
**