alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Steven L. Polacek, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of Capella Education Company; and2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date: April 27, 2018



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven L. Polacek                            
|Steven L. Polacek                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 1 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 2 of 43
US v Scott D e Warren (18-CR 223) 904

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 3 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 4 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 5 of 43
US v Scott D e Warren (18-CR 223) 907

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 6 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 7 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 8 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 9 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 10 of 43
US v Scott D e Warren (18-CR 223) 912

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 11 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 12 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 13 of 43
US v Scott D e Warren (18-CR 223) 915

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 14 of 43
EXHIBIT 11

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 15 of 43

EXHIBIT 12 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 17 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 18 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 19 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 20 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 21 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 22 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 23 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 24 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 25 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 26 of 43

EXHIBIT 13 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 28 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 29 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 30 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 31 of 43
EXHIBIT 16 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 32 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 33 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 34 of 43
EXHIBIT 17 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 35 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 36 of 43
EXHIBIT 18 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 37 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 38 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 39 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 40 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 41 of 43
EXHIBIT 19 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 42 of 43
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 43 of 43
Exhibit 13.1

Certification        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Multicanal S.A., asociedad anónima(stock corporation) (the "Company"), does here certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge,
that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
June 29, 2004

| |  | By: |  | /s/CARLOS ALBERTO MOLTINITitle: Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Multicanal S.A. and will be retained by Multicanal S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14207]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Yakima Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Yakima PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on June 11, 1996 
in rooms 204 & 205 at the Samuelson Union Building, Central Washington 
University, Ellensburg, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. 
and continue until 4:00 p.m. This meeting will focus on continuing the 
discussion of managing dense dry forests under the Northwest Forest 
Plan. All Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the 
public. Interested citizens are welcome to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee 
National Forest, P.O. Box 811, Wenatchee, Washington 98807, 509-662-
4335.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Paul Hart,
Designated Federal Official, Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 96-14207 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Vincent T. Donnelly, President and
Chief Executive Officer of PMA Capital Corporation, do hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual
Report of PMA Capital Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMA Capital
Corporation.  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





/s/ Vincent T. DonnellyVincent
      T. DonnellyPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
      11, 2008
November 7, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARK ANTHONY RODRIGU EZ , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 01033

- CR NO. 14

- 12

- 0103 4

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JAY ALI SAB REE, a .k.a . Ja y A. Sa bre e , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-10005

D.C . No. 2:14-c r-00601-SR B
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Susa n R . B olton, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 15, 2016 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, LEAVY, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Ja y Ali Sa bre e a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle n ge s his guilty -ple a

c onvic tion a

nd 48-m onth se nte nc e for a ssa u lt by stra ngling or suffoc ating a spouse or intim ate pa rtne r within India

n c ountry , in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 113(a)(8), 1152. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967),



# FIL ED
MAR 21 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Sa

bre e ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c o unse l of re c o rd. W e have provide d Sa bre e the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or
answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. Sa bre e wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . Our inde pe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to P e n son v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se e Unite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss the a ppe a l. Se e id. at 988. At se nte nc ing, thedistric t c o urt a nnounc e d a

spe c ia l c ondition of supe rvise d
re le a se that

Sa bre e not c onta c t the vic tim , Joda h Sy re tta Se ym our, a

nd tha t the probat ion offic e r ve rify

c om plia nc e . This spe c ia l c ondition of supe rvise d re le a se doe s not a ppe ar in the w ritte n judgm e nt. W e re m and to thedistric t c ourt to a dd to the w ritte n judgm e nt this spe c ia l supe rvise d re le a se c ondition. Se eUnite d State s v . He rnande z , 795 F.3d 1159, 1169 (9th C ir. 2015) (re m anding for thedistric t c ourt to m ake the writte n judgm e nt c o nsiste nt with the una m biguous oral pronounc e m e nt of se nte nc e ). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D; RE M ANDE D to c or r e c t the judgm e nt.

1 5
- 1 0 0 0 5 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135891 & (3) (6) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DAVID A. MAPLES, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff, Justices 

v SC: 135891 

 AGC: 0151/08 
 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, 

and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the 

requested relief. The motions for appointment of counsel and to strike the defendant’s 

brief are DENIED. 

p0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302**

 

I, Margaret Theiss Faison, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: March 25, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1





NET TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine  months ended June  30, 2011 of NetTalk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anastasios Kyriakides, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,   as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anastasios KyriakidesAnastasios KyriakidesChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: August 15, 2011
**CERTIFICATION**

|         |                                                 |                                                  |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|         | Date:                May 14, 2007                    |
|    |                                            |                                             |
|              |                                                 | /s/                Jerald L. Fenstermaker   |
|         | Jerald                L. Fenstermaker,               |
|         | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|         | (Principal                Executive Officer)         |
|         |                                         |                                            |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|         | Date:                May 14, 2007            |
|    |                                    |                                       |
|              |                                         | /s/                Daniel F. Graham   |
|         | Daniel                F. Graham,             |
|         | Chief                Financial Officer       |
|         | (Principal                Financial Officer) |

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kevin GATEN, Appellant.

No. 62225.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Dec. 28, 1993.

Doris Gregory Black, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon for which he was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of eight years. In his appeal, Defendant raises seven allegations of error. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 10.49





ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT







ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT dated as of August 22, 2008 and effective December 9, 2007 the “Effective Date”) by and between Carl L. Smith III (the "Assignor") and Craca Properties, LLC ("Assignee").





WHEREAS, the Assignor has entered into that certain Stock Option Agreement  (the “Option”) with Sologic, Inc., as amended, which has been assumed by Sunovia Energy Technologies, Inc. (“Sunovia”);




WHEREAS, the Option provides the Assignor with the ability to acquire 500,000,000 shares of common stock of Sunovia at $0.10 per share;





WHEREAS, Assignor and Assignee have verbally agreed as of the Effective Date to the assignment of the Option by the Assignor to the Assignee;





WHEREAS, the Assignor and the Assignee now wish to memorialize in writing the assignment by the Assignor of his rights, title and interest in the Option;





WHEREAS, Assignee wishes to accept Assignor's assignment of the Option;





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:





Section 1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns all of his rights, title and interest in the Option to the Assignee and the Assignee hereby accepts such assignment. Upon the execution and delivery of this Assignment Agreement by the Assignor and the Assignee, the Assignee shall, as of the date hereof, acquire the Option and succeed to the rights, title and interest of Assignor thereunder.





Section 2. Governing Law. Except to the extent preempted by federal law, this Assignment Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.





Section 3. Successors. This Assignment Agreement shall be binding upon Assignor's personal and legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees, legatees and assigns.





Section 4. Counterparts. This Assignment Agreement may be signed in counterpart, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.


















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor and the Assignee have executed this Assignment Agreement.




ASSIGNOR:


ASSIGNEE:



CRACA PROPERTIES, LLC/s/ Carl L. Smith III


/s/ Richard Craig HallCarl L. Smith, III


Name: Richard Craig Hall

Title: Managing Member




ACKNOWLEDGED:


SUNOVIA ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC./s/ Matthew A. VealName: Matthew Veal

Title: Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON

Senior U.S. District Judge: Raner C. Collins Date: October 28, 2019

USA v. Scott Daniel Warren Case Number: CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (DTF)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Anna Wright/Nathaniel Walters/Glenn McCormick

Attorney for Defendant: Gregory Kuykendall/Amy Knight (Retained)

Deputy Clerk: Sherry Gammon

Court Reporter: Erica McQuillen

Interpreter: N/A 

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Presence Waived ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

Motion Hearing/Status Conference

Matter comes before the Court re: Motion in Limine to Preclude Prior Acts (Doc. 348) filed by the 

Defendant, Motion in Limine to Exclude Alien Smuggling Expert (Doc. 349) filed by the Defendant 

and Motion to Clarify Order re: 353 (Doc. 356) filed by the Government. 

Argument presented by Mr. Kuykendall and Mr. Walters re: the Motion in Limine to Preclude Prior 

Acts (Doc. 348). The motion is taken Under Advisement. The Motion in Limine to Exclude Alien 

Smuggling Expert (Doc. 349) is moot as the Government does not intend to call the expert as a 

witness in their case in chief. The Motion to Clarify Order re: 353 (Doc. 356), argued by Mr. Walters 

and Mr. Kuykendall, is Granted in Part. The Court provides clarification as to the gas station videos 

and the selfies. 

Counsel and the Court retire to chambers at 2:08 p.m. to review the jury questionnaires for strikes. 

Counsel are excused at 4:49 p.m. Court continues to 10/29/2019 at 1:30 p.m. to further review jury 

questionnaires. 

Motion Hearing: 28 Minutes

Start: 1:29 p.m. Stop: 1:57 p.m.

In camera review: 2 Hours 41 Minutes

 Start: 2:08 p.m. Stop: 4:49 p.m.

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 360 Filed 10/28/19 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Douglas Haig, 

Defendant. 

No. 18-00105MJ 

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Continue Status 

Hearing (Doc. 16), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED the motion is GRANTED. The status hearing currently set for 

March 15, 2018 is reset for April 16, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge John 

Z. Boyle, Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, 

Arizona 85003, Courtroom 302. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)______ will commence on _______for a total of ______days. 

 Dated this 8th day of March, 2018.
#### Dorger et al. *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 23163

Decided October 14, 1931.)

*Mr. Alfred B. Benedict, Mr. Froome Morris, Mr. M. Froome Barbour,*and *Mr. Smith W. Bennett,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Robert N. Gorman,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Louis J. Schneider, Mr. Dudley M. Outcalt, Mr. R. T. Dickerson*and *Mr. Gilbert Bettman,*attorney general, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in ■error he, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is • involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.