alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 540 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 15, 2009. 

Whereas the people of North Carolina experienced a devastating tragedy when a massive explosion occurred at 

the ConAgra Foods plant in Garner, North Carolina, 

shortly before 11:30 a.m. on June 9, 2009; 

Whereas the 500,000-square-foot plant, one of the largest 

owned by ConAgra Foods, employs 900 people, 300 of 

whom were on site when the blast occurred; 

Whereas three workers lost their lives when the explosion 

ripped through the plant; 

Whereas employee Louis Junior Watson re-entered the building to help a coworker escape and both employees died 

when the structure caved in; 

Whereas at least 40 employees were injured, some suffering 

from exposure to toxic ammonia fumes and at least four 

with critical burns; 

Whereas three brave firefighters were treated for inhalation; 

Whereas North Carolina’s first responders, fire, police, and 

EMS, were quick to the scene and prevented any further 

loss of life or injury, and private citizens risked their 

well-being to come to the aid of their friends and neighbors; 
2 

•HRES 540 EH 

Whereas the Garner Police and Fire Departments have cooperated with North Carolina Task Force 8 Urban 

Search and Rescue to search and secure the building and 

its periphery; 

Whereas agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Wake County Fire Marshal, inspectors from the North Carolina Department of Labor, 

and agents with the United States Chemical Safety 

Board have combined efforts to investigate the cause of 

the explosion; 

Whereas the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

has inspected the site of the explosion to ensure no contamination spreads from the plant; 

Whereas the above mentioned agencies will continue to work 

together with private citizens to investigate the accident, 

provide assistance to families of the victims, and ensure 

public health and safety in this disaster’s aftermath; and 

Whereas ConAgra has established the ConAgra Foods Garner 

Plant Fund in memory of those lost in this tragedy, has 

set up assistance and relief services for the families of 

the victims, and is helping support surviving workers: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses condolences to the families, friends, 

and loved ones of the victims of the explosion at the 

ConAgra Foods plant in Garner, North Carolina; 

(2) honors Barbara McLean Spears of Dunn, North 

Carolina, Louis Junior Watson of Clayton, North Carolina, and Rachel Mae Poston Pulley of Clayton, North 
3 

•HRES 540 EH 

Carolina, who lost their lives in the explosion, and the 

40 others who were injured; 

(3) expresses sympathies to the people of Garner, 

the entire State of North Carolina, and the Nation who 

grieve for the victims; and 

(4) commends the heroic actions of the Garner Police and Fire Departments, the quick response of the 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 

and all other first responders, emergency services personnel, and private citizens who responded to the crisis. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      William E. Hitselberger, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      PMA Capital Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report of PMA Capital
      Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of PMA Capital Corporation.
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/
                William E. HitselbergerWilliam
                E. HitselbergerExecutive
                Vice President andChief
                Financial OfficerMarch
                13, 2007
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

WILLIAM MAYE

- PALOMA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2 02 3

- 1423

May 10, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Robert Dittmer,

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and Clark E. Green, Assistant

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee and James A. Hellickson,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.

Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SMITH , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF RADIO ONE, INC.
As of December 31, 2006
  K261AB 
KBFB-FM 
KBXX-FM 
KRBV-FM 
KMJQ-FM 
KROI-FM 
KSOC-FM 
WCDX-FM
    
    WERQ-FM
WFUN-FM
WFXC-FM
WFXK-FM
WHHL-FM
WHTA-FM
WKJM-FM
WKJS-FM
    
    WKYS-FM
WMMJ-FM
WNNL-FM
WOL-AM
WOLB-AM
WPHI-FM
WPPZ-FM
WQOK-FM
    
    WPZZ-FM
WRNB-FM
WROU-AM
WTPS-AM
WWIN-AM
WWIN-FM
WYCB-AM
  
  
   
  
    KTTB-FM
    
    WGZB-FM
    
    WLRS-FMWCKX-FM
    
    WGZB-FM1
    
    WLRX-FMWDHT-FM
    
    WING-AM
    
    WMJM-FM




---



##### 



WDJX-FM
    
    WIZF-FM
    
    WMOJ-FMWENZ-FM
    
    WJMO-AM
    
    WXMA-FMWERE-AM
    
    WJYD-FM
    
    WXMG-FMWGTZ-FM
    
    WKSW-FM
    
    WZAK-FM
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jenifer Anderson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Mesa Public Schools District, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00692-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Settlement (Doc.43), filed on 

February 7, 2019. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that a Stipulation to Dismiss shall be filed on or before April 12, 

2019. If a Stipulation to Dismiss has not been filed by this deadline, the parties shall file a 

Status Report to the Court on that date. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions in this case (Doc. 29) are 

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. These motions may be refiled if full performance of 

the settlement is not reached. 

Dated this 8th day of February, 2019. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00692-DJH Document 44 Filed 02/08/19 Page 1 of 1
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |                                                          |   |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: June 8, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Kwok-Keung Liu                                            |   |
|                |   | Kwok-Keung Liu                                                |   |
|                |   | President                                                     |   |
|                |   | (principal executive officer and principal financial officer) |   |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1562]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported For Exhibition; 
Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibit, ``Enamels of Limoges'' (See list),\1\ imported 
for abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine 
that the temporary exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects 
at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, on or about March 4, 
1996 through June 16, 1996, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of this determination is ordered to be published the Federal Register.

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contracting Mrs. 
Carol B. Epstein, Assistant General Counsel, at 619-6981, and the 
address is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 Fourth Street, 
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 19, 1996
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-1562 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
#### Ralls *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 23169

Decided October 14, 1931.)

*Mr. Elmer W. Luts*and *Mr. Arden W. Wisman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. D. Sears,*prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ring Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert “Steve” Owens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,            that:

 

(1) This Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) I further certify to the best of my knowledge that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ring Energy, Inc.

 

 

| Date: August 11, 2008 | By/s/ Robert “Steve” Owens_______________ |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Robert “Steve” Owens, President, |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

BARRY COVINGTON AND § 

SHARON COVINGTON, § No. 23, 2017 

 § 

 Appellants Below, § 

 Appellants, § 

§ Court Below – Superior Court 

v. § for the State of Delaware 

 § 

THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT § C.A. No. S16A-05-002 

OF THE CITY OF REHOBOTH § 

BEACH, § 

 § 

 Appellee Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

Submitted: August 16, 2017 

Decided: August 29, 2017 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER 

 This 29th day of August 2017, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, we affirm the Superior Court’s judgment on the basis of 

its ruling on the pending ordinance doctrine and therefore do not need to address the 

Board’s argument that the City is an indispensable party. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14876]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Application (#96-02-U-00-EUG) To Use 
the Revenue From a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at Eugene Airport/
Mahlon Sweet Field, Submitted by the City of Eugene, Eugene, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction to the notice of intent to rule on application to 
use the revenue from a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at Eugene 
Airport/Mahlon Sweet Field, Eugene, Oregon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This correction amends the information included in the 
previously published notice.
    In notice document 96-10518 beginning on page 18771 in the issue of 
Monday, April 29, 1996, in the first column under BACKGROUND 
INFORMATION, the second paragraph should read as follows:
    The following is a brief overview of the application.
    Level of proposed PFC: $3.00.
    Actual charge effective date: November 1, 1993.
    Proposed charge expiration date: December 1, 1998.
    Total estimated PFC revenues: $1,850,000.00.
    Brief description of proposed project: Land acquisition--Phase I.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Carolyn Read, (206) 227-2661; Seattle Airports District Office, 
SEA-ADO; Federal Aviation Administration; 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Suite 
250; Renton, WA 98055-4056. The application may be reviewed in person 
at this same location.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 5, 1996.
David A. Field,
Manager, Planning, Programming and Capacity Branch, Northwest Mountain 
Region.
[FR Doc. 96-14876 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-5076 SAVANTAGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in consolidated case nos. 08-CV-021 and 09-CV-113, Senior Judge Bohdan A. Futey. ON MOTION Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge. ORDER Upon consideration of Savantage Financial Services, Inc.'s unopposed motion to amend the protective order of the Court of Federal Claims to allow James W. Erwin, Esq. to come within its terms, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# JUN 3 0 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk Date
cc: Timothy Sullivan, Esq. 

# ma i 

# lt it 

# rolritgr" A. Bondurant Eley, Esq. s8 JUN 3 0 2009
CLERK
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







/s/ Arthur H. PennArthur H. PennAugust 3, 2011
Exhibit 10.14

Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officers

as of March 25, 2010

On March 25, 2010, the Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors of JMP Group Inc. (the
Company) completed its annual performance and compensation review of the Companys named executive officers and approved the performance objectives for the named executive officers under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan, as more
fully described below.

Base Salaries

The 2010 annual base salaries for the Companys named executive officers continue to be as follows:



|                                                                                  |  |               |        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | -------
|Name and Position                                                                 |  | Base Salary 1
|Joseph A. Jolson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                            |  | $             | 200,000
|Raymond Jackson, Chief Financial Officer                                          |  | $             | 200,000
|Craig R. Johnson, President                                                       |  | $             | 200,000
|Mark L. Lehmann, Director of Equities and Co-President of JMP Securities          |  | $             | 200,000
|Carter D. Mack, Director of Investment Banking and Co-President of JMP Securities |  | $             | 200,000

2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan

The Committee established performance objectives for 2010 with respect to the payment of cash bonuses to each of the named
executive officers under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan. Under the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan, each of the named executive officers may, subject to the Compensation Committees authority to reduce any such bonus in its sole and
absolute discretion, receive a cash bonus payment upon either or both of the following: (i) the achievement by the Company of a certain performance target with respect to operating income for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, and
(ii) with respect to each named executive officer except our Chief Financial Officer, the production of revenues attributable to his area of business responsibility or production. Any cash bonus payments with respect to 2010 under the 2007
Senior Executive Bonus Plan will be paid in one lump sum payment shortly after the end of the 2010 fiscal year subject to the terms of any applicable compensation program, including, without limitation, that which provides for the election of the
form of compensation over certain breakpoints or other applicable compensation plan.

This document is intended to be a
summary of existing oral, at will arrangements, and in no way is intended to provide any additional rights to any of the named executive officers.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6716

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRENCE LEE HOGGARD, a/k/a Chuck,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-92-73, CA-97-427-2)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Lee Hoggard, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ann Snow, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrence Lee Hoggard appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for

a certificate of appealability, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Hoggard, Nos. CR-92-73; CA-97-427-2 (E.D. Va. Apr.

13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:01-cr-00691-SRB Document 25 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Douglas A. Neugold, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ATMI, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 23, 2007                                                            /s/ Douglas A. Neugold   Douglas A. Neugold   President and Chief Executive Officer