alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| /s/    Charif Souki                                                                                                                                                          |
| Charif SoukiChief Executive Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. |

----
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc. (Net1) on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Serge Belamant and Herman
Kotze, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
Net1, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and            
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                          
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Net1.

|Date: August 29, 2006 | /s/: Serge BelamantName: Serge Belamant
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                                                
|Date: August 29, 2006 | /s/: Herman KotzeName: Herman Kotze
      Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary     

---
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clyde REESE, Appellant. Clyde REESE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 44712, 46580.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 27, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 31, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 26, 1993.

Laura G. Martin, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and SPINDEN and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

. Clyde Reese appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of one count of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo 1986, two counts of rape in violation of § 566.030, RSMo 1986, and one count of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of § 566.040, RSMo 1986. Defendant Reese was sentenced concurrently to ten years for sodomy, ten years for the first count of rape, twelve years for the second count of rape, and five years for the sexual assault offense. He also appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion under Rule 29.15 based upon his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

The judgments are affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our reports dated March 8, 2006, accompanying the financial
statements and on internal control over financial reporting included in the
Annual Report of AFC Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December
25, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports
in the Registration Statements of AFC Enterprises, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
56444, effective March 2, 2001 and File No. 333-98867, effective August 28,
2002) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-86914).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 8, 2006
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96467) pertaining to the 1988
Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Share Incentive Plan of IOMED, Inc. of our report dated August 6, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IOMED, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003.

| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | ---------------------

Salt
Lake City, Utah
September 15, 2002



QuickLinks
NO. 07-05-0350-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 20, 2006

______________________________

SHAWN FULLER, Appellant V. SCOTT COWAN, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2004-595,916; HON. PAULA DAVIS LANEHA RT, PRESIDING

_______________________________ ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. Appellant

Shawn Fuller and appelleeScott Cowan, by and through their attorneys, have moved to dismiss this appeal due to all matters having be en resolved between the parties. Without passing on the merits of the cases, we gr ant the mot ions pur

suant to Texas Rule of Appella te Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at the request of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6418

JOHN SAMUEL MOORE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PAUL KIRBY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (CA-94-1094)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Samuel Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Silas Bent Taylor, Deputy

Attorney General, Scott E. Johnson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that

a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Moore v. Kirby, No. CA-94-1094 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3798EM

_____________ Sheri Sutton, for Nicola J. Sutton, a * minor, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: April 17, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Sheri Sutton, for Nicola J. Sutton, a minor, appeals the district court's grant of su mmaryjudgment affirming the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Sutton' s application for child's survivor's benefits. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lack precedential value. We affirm the district court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Teja N. Shariff, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Teja N. ShariffTeja N. ShariffChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      23.1**








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-95201) of YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. of our report dated
      May
      18, 2006 (except for Note 8, as to which the date is June 26, 2006) relating
      to
      the financial statements of YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. as of and for
      the
      years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, included in the Annual Report on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.







/s/
        WEINBERG & COMPANY, P.A.
  Certified
        Public Accountants


Los
      Angeles, California


June
      29,
      2006
SIGNATURE PAGE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
                                       FOR
                             HARBINDER SINGH BRANCH

                       INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR SIGNATURE PAGE

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have  executed  this  Subscription
Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    NUMBER OF SHARES 60,000 x $0.125 = $ 7,500
                                                     ------   ------     ------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
        <S>                                         <C>

        X   /s/ Harbinder Singh Branch
       ----------------------------------------      --------------------------------
       Signature                                     Signature (if purchasing jointly)

          Harbinder Singh Branch
       ----------------------------------------      --------------------------------
       Name Typed or Printed                         Name Typed or Printed

          65 Lovelace Avenue
       ----------------------------------------      --------------------------------
       Address                                       Address

          Solihull, Birmingham B91 3JR UK
       ----------------------------------------      --------------------------------
       City, State and Zip Code                      City, State and Zip Code


       Telephone - Business                          Telephone - Business


       Telephone - Residence                         Telephone - Residence


       Facsimile - Business                          Facsimile - Business


       Facsimile - Residence                         Facsimile - Residence


       Tax ID# or Social Security                    Tax ID# or Social Security
</TABLE>

Name in which Shares should be issued:   Harbinder Singh Branch
                                       -----------------------------------------

Dated:
         -----------------------------------

This Subscription Agreement is agreed to and accepted as of  October 28, 2000
                                                           ---------------------

                               IGOHEALTHY.COM, INC.

                                       /s/ Bill Glaser
                                       --------------------
                               Name:    Bill Glaser
                               Title:   Secretary and Chief Operating Officer

                                       84
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.03

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into ATMI, Inc.'s previously filed
Registration Statements File Nos. 33-77060, 33-93048, 333-49561, 333-56349,
333-55827, 333-46222, 333-82089, 333-94641, 333-31982 and 333-46224. We also
consent to the application of our reports to the schedule labeled "Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts" as of the dates and period covered by our reports.

                                       /s/ Rath, Anders, Dr. Wanner & Partner

                                       /s/ Dipl. -Kfm. Kabisch
                                             Vereidigter Buchprufer

                                       /s/ Dipl. -Kfm. Metzler
                                             Wirtschaftsprufer

Munich, Germany
March 29, 2001
**Exhibit      **
**32.0**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by this                Report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                       |                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|        | By:                                                                                              | /s/ Robert                J. Stroh, Jr. |
|   | Robert                J. Stroh, Jr.                                                                        |
|   | Chairman,                Chief Executive Officer and Chief                Financial                Officer |
|   | November                9, 2007                                                                            |

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED R OBERT P. WINTER , A ppellant , v. Case No. 5D 21
- 556 LT C ase No. 2019
- CA
- 003719
- 11J -G DAFFLYN PROPERTY, LLC., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, WILLIAM WARREN PROPERTIES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION D/B/A STORQUEST SELF STORAGE, 7
- ELEVEN INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION, ET AL. ,

Appellee s. ________________________________/ Decision filed June 7, 202 2 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt f or Seminole County , Michael J

. R udisill, Judge. Phil A. D'Aniello, of Fassett, A nthony & Taylor, P A, Orlando, f or Appellant. Lissett e M. G onzalez, of Cole, Scott & K is sane, P

. A

. , Miami, for

A ppellee s. PER CUR IAM. AFFIRMED.

SASSO , TRAVER and WOZNIAK , JJ. , conc ur.
* Judge Widener did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7239
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRED SHORES, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-49, CA-97-146-5-MU) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, * MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Shores, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Fred Shores, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Shores, Nos. CR-90-49; CA-97-146-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 District of Arizona

ADULT PRINTED DIAPERS, LLC

2:18-CV-00370-DJH

REARZ, INC, ET AL.

Faithfulness, LLC

685 Market St.

San Francisco, CA 94105 J. Clark Law Firm, PLLC

2 North Central Avenue, 18th and 19th Floors

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Case 2:18-cv-00370-DJH Document 61 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:18-CV-00370-DJH 0.00

Case 2:18-cv-00370-DJH Document 61 Filed 06/25/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14343]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Public Buildings Service; Notice of Availability for a 
Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Proposed Expansion 
Port of Entry, Pacific Highway, Blaine, WA

    The General Services Administration (GSA) hereby gives notice a 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) has been prepared in 
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 
as amended for the proposed expansion of the Port of Entry at Pacific 
Highway, Blaine, Whatcom County, Washington. The SEIS is being made 
available May 31, 1996. GSA is the lead Federal agency for the 
preparation of the SEIS. The SEIS evaluates a no action alternative and 
four action alternatives.
    Written comments on the alternatives, impacts, and recommended 
mitigation measures should be sent no later than July 1, 1996 to GSA's 
EIS subconsultant, Berger/ABAM Engineers Inc., 33301 Ninth Avenue 
South, Federal Way, Washington, 98003. Comments will also be accepted 
at a public hearing to be held on June 11, 1996, at the Blaine Public 
Library, 610 Third Street, Blaine, Washington. The meeting will be held 
at 6:00 p.m. Representatives of GSA and Berger/ABAM will receive 
comments from interested parties regarding the project proposal, the 
environmental analysis, and recommended mitigation measures. All 
comments received will be made a part of the administrative record for 
the SEIS and will be evaluated as part of the final environmental 
review process.
    For further information contact Donna M. Meyer, Regional 
Environmental Program Officer, General Services Administration, Public 
Buildings Service, 400 15th Street SW., Auburn, Washington, 98001 or on 
(206) 931-7675.

    Dated: May 29, 1996.
L. Jay Pearson,
Regional Administrator (10A).
[FR Doc. 96-14343 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-23-M