alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3




FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION




Form of Waiver




     In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in
the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily
waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or
benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury,
as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. I acknowledge that this regulation may
require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements,
policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my
employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity
or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. This waiver
includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the
requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any
compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which
this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: February 20, 2009

	 	 

[Name]
	 	 





UST
Seq. No. 745
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30937-30938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15452]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
[Delegation Order No. 77 (Rev. 28)]


Delegation of Authority

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Delegation of authority.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The authority to issue or execute agreements to rescind 
notices of deficiency is given to the appropriate officials at the 
local level to whom authority should be delegated. These individuals 
may then redelegate authority to those with actual responsibility for 
signing or rescinding

[[Page 30938]]

statutory notices of deficiency. The text of the delegation order 
appears below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 17, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grace Robertson, CP:EX:CS:R, Room 108, 
Aerospace Building, Washington, D.C. 20224, (202) 401-4478 (not a toll-
free call).

DELEGATION ORDER NO. 77 (REV. 28)

Effective: May 17, 1996.

Authority To Issue or Execute Agreement To Rescind Notices of 
Deficiency

    Authority: To sign and send to the taxpayer by registered or 
certified mail, any notice of deficiency and to sign a written form or 
document rescinding any notice of deficiency.

Delegated to:

Chiefs, Appeals Offices
Appeals Team Chiefs (as to their respective cases)
Directors, Computing Centers
Directors, Customer Service Centers
Directors, Submission Processing Centers
Assistant Commissioner (International)
Chiefs, Employee Plans and Exempt Organizations Divisions
Chiefs, Collection Divisions
Chiefs, Examination Divisions

    Redelegation: This authority may be redelegated by all the above 
listed officials, except Appeals Team Chiefs, directly to selected 
individuals within their functional area. This authority may not be 
further redelegated.
    Sources of Authority: Authority granted to the Commissioner of 
Internal Revenue, District Directors, and Service Center Directors by 
26 CFR 301.7701-9; 26 CFR 301.6212-1; 26 CFR 301.6861-1; 26 U.S.C. 
6212; 26 U.S.C. 6212(d); Treasury Order 150-10; and section 1562 of the 
Tax Reform Act of 1986.
    To the extent that the authority previously exercised consistent 
with this order may require ratification, it is hereby approved and 
ratified. This order supersedes Delegation Order No. 77 (Rev. 27), 
effective October 15, 1992.

    Dated: May 17, 1996.
Michael P. Dolan,
Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 96-15452 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Carla Lee KLAHS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William Gene KLAHS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 54480.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 31, 1989.

David Barton, Arnold, for defendant-appellant.

Steven A. Cox, Chesterfield, for plaintiff-respondent.

REINHARD, Judge.

Dissolution case. Husband appeals from that portion of the decree distributing the marital property. We affirm.

In husband’s sole point on appeal, he contends the court erred in refusing to order sold all tangible marital property and dividing the property equally along with his pension plan and social security benefits. Our standard of review is set forth in *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). We must affirm the judgment unless it is unsupported by substantial evidence, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, or unless it erroneously applies or declares the law. *Id.*

The parties were married in 1971 and separated in 1984. Husband suffered a stroke and did not attend the trial. The wife testified, as did husband’s daughter by a previous marriage.

The court valued the marital property and set it off to the parties. The wife received the real estate and a 1976 Oldsmobile; husband received his pension plan, a 1983 Oldsmobile, a 1984 Ford truck, a mobile home and house furnishings. The husband also was awarded the $839 per month social security benefits he was receiving.

*738A review of the record reveals that the court’s value as to the marital property was supported by evidence, and that the amounts each spouse received were approximately equal.

We cannot say that the court abused its discretion in the manner in which it distributed the marital property and under the above standard of review, we affirm.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

CRANDALL, P.J., and CRIST, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

 

 

I, E. Lynn Wilkinson, Chief Financial Officer of Omega Flex, Inc., certify that: 

 

1.        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

 

 (c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)               All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses (if any) in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)               Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2006 

 

/s/ E. Lynn Wilkinson______________________

 

E. Lynn Wilkinson 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 
|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 818 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 818

Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week and the work of 
   firefighters in educating and protecting the communities of this 
                                Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2009

    Mr. King of New York (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. 
 Andrews, and Mr. Pascrell) submitted the following resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week and the work of 
   firefighters in educating and protecting the communities of this 
                                Nation.

Whereas since the organization of the first fire departments during the colonial 
        era of this Nation, firefighters have maintained their dedication to 
        protecting the health and safety of the American public;
Whereas firefighters presently provide a multitude of services to our 
        communities, including emergency medical services, special rescue 
        response, hazardous material and terrorism response, and public safety 
        education;
Whereas 103 firefighters lost their lives in the line of duty in 2008;
Whereas the Nation's fire departments respond to emergency calls nearly once per 
        second and are dispatched to fire emergencies every 22 seconds;
Whereas approximately 1,145,000 fires were reported in 2008;
Whereas firefighters always respond with courage, whether they are confronted 
        with acts of terrorism, natural disasters, or other emergencies;
Whereas Fire Prevention Week is the longest running public health and safety 
        observance on record, as firefighters have been honored for their role 
        in educating the American public since the first Fire Prevention Week 
        was declared by President Warren G. Harding in 1922;
Whereas the National Fire Protection Association has designated the week of 
        October 4 through October 10, 2009, as Fire Prevention Week; and
Whereas educating all Americans to ``Stay Fire Smart'' continues to be a 
        priority for all firefighters: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the work of firefighters in educating and 
        protecting the communities of this Nation; and
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week.
                                 <all>
```
1996 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

8-15-1996

Coalition Save v. Bd Ed DE

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 95-7452

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1996 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Coalition Save v. Bd Ed DE" (1996). 1996 Decisions. Paper 111.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1996/111
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 __________________ 

 No. 95-7452 

 __________________ 

 COALITION TO SAVE OUR CHILDREN, 

 Appellant 

 v 

 

 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE; 

 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CHRISTIANA SCHOOL DISTRICT; 

 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BRANDYWINE SCHOOL DISTRICT; 

 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE COLONIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT; 

 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE RED CLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT; 

 DELAWARE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON DESEGREGATION 

 __________________ 

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court 

 for the District of Delaware 

 (D.C. Civil No. 56-01816) 

 __________________ 

 

 Argued: Tuesday, March 12, 1996 

 Before: NYGAARD, SAROKIN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges 

 __________________ 

 ORDER AMENDING OPINION 

 __________________ 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on July 

24, 1996, be 

amended as follows: 

 Page 17, footnote 8, line 27: Substitute "[An expert called y the 

Appellee House of 

Representatives,]" for "[Another Coalition expert,]." 

 By the Court: 

 

 /s/ Ruggero J. Aldisert 

 Ruggero J. Aldisert 

 Circuit Judge 

 

Dated: August 15, 1996
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60101 Conference Calendar

__________________
FEREYDOUN ZARE MONTANAGH, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A23-441-017

- - - - - - - - - - December 21, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Iranian citizen Fereydoun Zare Montanagh appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals's (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings to seek asylum or for reconsideration of the BIA's earlier denial of his request for a waiver from deportation. Montanagh contends that he has a constitutional right to a closed asylum hearing; that the immigration judge declined to assure him that the Iranian government would not beNo. 95-60101 -2- told about any asylum application; that the BIA erred by dismissing his fear of persecution without hearing evidence of that fear; and that his well-founded fear of persecution merits a grant of asylum. We have reviewed the record and the BIA's opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
PETITION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1494]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board <SUP>1

    \1\  The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 
Stat. 803 (the Act), which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and 
took effect on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce 
Commission (ICC) and transferred certain functions and proceedings 
to the Surface Transportation Board (Board). Section 204(b)(1) of 
the Act provides, in general, that proceedings pending before the 
ICC on the effective date of the legislation shall be decided under 
the law in effect prior to January 1, 1996, insofar as they involve 
functions retained by the Act. This notice relates to a proceeding 
that was pending with the ICC prior to January 1, 1996, and to 
functions that are subject to Board jurisdiction pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. 10901. Therefore, this notice applies the law in effect prior 
to the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Finance Docket No. 32855]


Alamo Gulf Coast Railroad Company--Lease and Operation 
Exemption--Certain Lines of Southern Pacific Transportation Company

    Alamo Gulf Coast Railroad Company (AGCRC) has filed a notice of 
exemption to acquire by lease and to operate 5 miles of rail line owned 
by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SPT) from milepost 252 
to milepost 257, near Beckmann Station, in Bexar County, TX. The 
proposed transaction is to be consummated on the date of final 
agreement of the parties, or on the effective date of the notice, 
whichever occurs later.<SUP>2

    \2\  Under 49 CFR 1150.32(b), the notice of exemption is 
effective 7 days after it is filed. The notice was filed on December 
29, 1995.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any comments must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 
1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20423 and served on: 
Richard A. Allen, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P., Suite 600, 888 
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006-3959.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.31. If the notice contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) [formerly 
10505(d)] may be filed any time. The filing of a petition to revoke 
will not stay the transaction.

    Decided: January 23, 1996.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1494 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1503]








BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 61 FR 1437, January 
19, 1996.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 10:00 a.m., 
Wednesday, January 24, 1996.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The open meeting has been canceled, and the 
scheduled item was handled via notation voting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: January 24, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 96-1503 Filed 1-24-96; 10:34 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0430

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

S.D.,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jennifer B. Lint, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 6 2024

03/06/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0430
Exhibit 10.4 



PROMISSORY NOTE 



	U.S. $200,000.00	
      January 7,
2009

    





        FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. (“Borrower”)
hereby promises to pay to John Rhodes (“Holder”), the principal sum of TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000.00), which shall be payable on or before December 31, 2009
(“Due Date”) along with interest at the rate of 12% pre annum. 



        In
the event of default, the Holder may declare the full amount due and payable immediately
and any unpaid balance of this Note shall bear interest at the rate of 15% pre annum from
the date of default until paid in full. 



        The
undersigned: 



	 	(a)  	  	Agrees
to remain and continue bound for the payment of the               principal of and
interest on this Note notwithstanding any               extension or extensions of the
time of payment of said principal               or any changes in the amount or amounts
to be paid under and by               virtue of the obligation to pay provided for in
this Note, or any               change or changes by way of release or surrender of any
              collateral, real or personal, held as security for the payment of
              this Note, and waives all and every kind of notice of such
              extension or extensions, change or changes. 






	 	(b)  	  	Waives
presentment, notice of dishonor, protest, notice of protest               and diligence
in collection, and all exemptions, whether homestead               or otherwise, to which
it may or thereafter be entitled under the               laws of Kentucky or any other
state; and 






	 	(c)  	  	Agrees,
in the event of default, to pay all costs of collecting,               securing or
attempting to collect or secure this Note, including               reasonable attorney’s
fees, whether same be collected or secured               by suit or otherwise. 






        This
Note shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, excluding its
conflicts of laws and the Borrower consents to venue in the Jefferson County Circuit
Court in Louisville, Kentucky. 



Borrower: 



Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. 



	By:	/s/ Bruce Widener
		
      

    
	 	 
		Bruce Widener
                                       

      

      

      Name
	  	
		CEO 
      

      
      Title