alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 6 

Recognizing the significant contribution coaches make in the life of children 

who participate in organized sports and supporting the goals and ideals 

of National Coaches Appreciation Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. MCINTYRE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the significant contribution coaches make in the 

life of children who participate in organized sports and 

supporting the goals and ideals of National Coaches Appreciation Week. 

Whereas coaches are a vital part of organized youth sports; 

Whereas approximately 42 million American children participate in organized sports each year, but more than 20 

million children in the United States lack the opportunity 

to participate in organized sports, in part because of an 

insufficient number of coaches; 

Whereas a national effort to promote coaching is needed to 

increase the number of adults serving as coaches in youth 

sports; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 6 IH 

Whereas the purpose of the Congressional Caucus on Youth 

Sports is to educate Members of Congress, the media, 

and the public on the need to restore a child-centered 

focus in youth sports that will produce immeasurable 

positive benefits for the well-being and character development of children; 

Whereas sports and coaches help children fight obesity, increase their self-esteem, learn leadership skills, and discover how to incorporate the values of sports into other 

aspects of their daily lives; 

Whereas youth sports activity can reduce gang participation 

and youth violence; 

Whereas children need adults who will believe in them and 

who give children the support they need to be a success; 

Whereas coaches can positively impact the physical, emotional, and educational life of children; 

Whereas coaches who volunteer their time help educate children, serve as role models, and, in some situations, are 

parental surrogates; and 

Whereas the designation of the week of September 13 

through 19, 2009, as National Coach Appreciation Week 

would raise awareness and leverage resources to engage 

millions of children in organized sports that promote 

health, nutrition, and fitness, as well as other youth development outcomes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the significant contribution 

3 coaches make in the life of children who participate 

4 in organized sports; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 6 IH 

1 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

2 Coach Appreciation Week; and 

3 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to observe National Coach Appreciation Week with 

5 appropriate recognition, activities, and programs to 

6 demonstrate the importance of sports and coaches in 

7 the life of children. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Amendment No. 1 to Mitek Systems, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 MITEK SYSTEMS, INC. 
 2006 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 The Mitek Systems, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan (the
“Plan”) be and hereby is amended as follows: 
 Section 3.1 is hereby amended such that the sentence which
reads “No person shall be granted more than 500,000 options in any one-year period.” is deleted and replaced with a new sentence which reads “No person shall be granted more than 3,500,000 options in any one-year period.”

 Section 4 is hereby amended such that the sentence which reads “The aggregate number of shares subject to
outstanding options shall not exceed 1,000,000 shares of Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 6).” is deleted and replaced with a new sentence which reads “The aggregate number of shares subject to outstanding options
shall not exceed 23,000,000 shares of Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 6).”
<PAGE>

                                                            Exhibit 23.1 Consent

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Northway Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 20, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Northway Financial, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1998.

                                        /S/ Shatswell, Macleod & Company, P.C.
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 25, 1999
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification****of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition I, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                David BergerDavid
                Berger
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              November
                1, 2007
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
registration statements No. 333-117956 and 333-79391 on Forms

S-8 of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 28, 2008,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HopFed Bancorp, Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of HopFed Bancorp, Inc



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Rayburn, Bates & Fitzgerald, P.C.
|                                     
|Brentwood, Tennessee                 
|Date: March 28, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leslie A. Merritt, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

State of Arizona, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-04540-PHX-DGC

ORDER 

Plaintiff moves the Court to reconsider its ruling that DPS criminalist Liza Peloza 

may testify about the ballistics test she performed as documented in her report. Doc. 390. 

For reasons stated below, the Court will direct Defendant to file a response to the motion 

by September 25, 2020.

Defendant identified Peloza as a fact witness and disclosed the report of the test she 

performed by firing .357 caliber bullets with Plaintiff’s gun and comparing their marking 

to the bullets collected from the four freeway shootings. Docs. 383 at 3, 383-3 at 24. 

Plaintiff moved to exclude Peloza’s opinions because she was never disclosed as an expert 

witness. Doc. 290 at 2. On September 4, 2020, the Court found that the failure to disclose 

Peloza as an expert witness was harmless and she therefore may testify at trial. Doc. 387 

at 3 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1)).

Plaintiff now moves to preclude Peloza’s testimony as inadmissible under Rule 702 

because it lacks foundation and is not based on an accepted methodology for firearms 

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC Document 397 Filed 09/17/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

identification. Doc. 290 at 2-5; see Doc. 382 at 4 (“Any witness who will testify in this 

case that Plaintiff’s gun is or is not a match with the evidence bullets will provide testimony 

based on ‘scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of 

Rule 702.’”) (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 701(c)). Plaintiff further argues that Peloza 

impermissibly seeks to testify about the examination of the bullets using an Evofinder. 

Doc. 290 at 5-6.

The Court did not rule that Peloza may testify at trial until September 4, 2020, and 

did not address whether her proposed testimony satisfies the requirements of Rule 702. See 

Docs. 382 at 4-5, 387 at 3. Plaintiff’s recent motion to preclude Peloza’s testimony 

therefore is not an impermissible motion for reconsideration. See LRCiv 7.2(g)(1). 

Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion by September 25, 2020. See

LRCiv 7.2(g)(2). The response shall specifically address (1) whether Defendant intends to 

have Peloza testify about the Evofinder examination, and (2) why her testimony is 

admissible under Rule 702. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion to preclude Peloza’s 

testimony (Doc. 390) by September 25, 2020.

2. Plaintiff may file a reply by October 2, 2020.

Dated this 17th day of September, 2020.

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC Document 397 Filed 09/17/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15168]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; 
Education.

ACTION: Amendment to notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amends the notice of an open meeting of the National 
Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board published on Tuesday, 
May 21, 1996, in Vol. 61, No. 99, page 25484. This notice changes the 
status of the meeting from open to partially closed, if necessary. This 
document is intended to notify the general public of the possibility of 
a closed session.

DATES: June 6, 1996.

TIMES: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., (open): 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., (closed).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting of the Board may be closed to 
the public from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. under the authority of Section 10(d) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. 
Appendix 2) and under exemptions (2) and (6) of Section 552b(c) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409; 5 U.S.C. 552b(c). The 
board may discuss matters that relate to the internal personnel rules 
and practices of the Board and to the personal qualifications and 
experience of candidates for the position of executive director. Such 
discussions would touch upon matters that would disclose information of 
a personal nature where disclosure would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy if conducted in open session. 
A summary of the activities at the closed session and related matters 
which are informative to the public consistent with the policy of Title 
5 U.S.C. 552b(c) will be available to the public within 14 days of the 
meeting.

    Dated: June 6, 1996.
Sharon P. Robinson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15168 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
H. Res. 812 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 2, 2010. 

Whereas the Military Working Dog Program, or K–9 Corps, 

was developed in 1942, shortly after the United States 

entered World War II; 

Whereas all four branches of the United States Armed 

Forces as well as other government agencies, including 

the Secret Service, Central Intelligence Agency, and 

Transportation Security Administration, use Military 

Working Dogs in service to the country; 

Whereas Military Working Dogs are trained in explosive detection, narcotic detection, sentry, patrol, tracking, and 

other specific areas; 

Whereas Military Working Dogs, through their training, have 

prevented injuries and saved the lives of thousands of 

United States citizens; 

Whereas more than 19,000 Military Working Dogs were acquired by the United States Armed Forces during World 

War II and of those 19,000, a little more than 10,000 

Military Working Dogs were utilized in the war effort; 

Whereas more than 1,500 Military Working Dogs were employed during the Korean War and 4,500 in the Vietnam 

War; 
2 

•HRES 812 EH 

Whereas, since September 11, 2001, Military Working Dogs 

have served in Iraq and Afghanistan and have been employed in detection work as part of homeland security 

and defense efforts; 

Whereas today approximately 2,000 Military Working Dogs 

serve at nearly 170 United States military bases worldwide, including bases in 40 States and 3 United States 

territories; 

Whereas retired Military Working Dogs are recognized for 

their lifetime of service in the United State Armed 

Forces; and 

Whereas charitable organizations and community groups are 

recognized for their work in coordination with the Department of Defense to help bring Military Working Dogs 

stationed overseas home to the United States for adoption when their active duty days are over and provide 

support to active K–9 military teams worldwide: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the significant contributions of the 

Military Working Dog Program to the United States 

Armed Forces; 

(2) honors active and retired Military Working 

Dogs for their loyal service and dedication to protecting 

the men and women of the United States Armed Forces; 

and 
3 

•HRES 812 EH 

(3) supports the adoption and care of these quality 

animals after their service is over. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96467) pertaining to the 1988
Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Share Incentive Plan of IOMED, Inc. of our report dated August 8, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IOMED, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.

|                                        |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|--------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                                        |  |                      
|Salt Lake City, Utah
September 20, 2002 |  |                      
|                                        |  |                      



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21

                              PMA CAPITAL CORPORATION
                     SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998


PMA Capital Corporation (Pennsylvania)
  PMA Reinsurance Corporation (Pennsylvania)
       Caliber One Indemnity Company (Delaware)
  Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)
       PMA Management Corporation (Pennsylvania)
       PMA Services Incorporated (Pennsylvania)
       Presque Enterprises Incorporated (Pennsylvania)
   Pennsylvania Manufacturers Indemnity Company (Pennsylvania)
   Manufacturers Alliance Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)
   Mid Atlantic States Investment Company (Delaware)
       Mid-Atlantic States Casualty Company (Pennsylvania)
       PMA Holdings Cayman, Ltd.
       PMA International Insurance Cayman, Ltd.
       High Mountain Reinsurance, Ltd. (Cayman)
   Caliber One Management Company, Inc. (Delaware)
   PMA Holdings Limited (Bermuda)
       Pennsylvania Manufacturers International Insurance, Ltd. (Bermuda)
   PMA Life Insurance Company (Pennsylvania)
#### The Red Eagle Bus Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(No. 22813

Decided May 27, 1931.)

*Mr. P. F. Reed,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Gilbert Bettmcm,*attorney general, and *Mr. T. J. Herbert,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that the order of the said Public Utilities Commission be, and the same hereby is, affirmed for the reason that the evidence in the record amply supports the conclusion of the commission that there is a convenience and necessity to be served by the proposed extension, and the order is in no wise unlawful or unreasonable.

*Order affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30551-30552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15334]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Parts 121 and 135

[Docket No. 28586; Notice No. 96-5]
RIN 2120-AE81


Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System and Mode S Transponder 
Requirements in the National Airspace System

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the NPRM published in 
the Federal Register on May 23, 1996 (61 FR 26036). The NPRM proposes 
to rescind the Mode S transponder requirement for all aircraft 
operations under part 135 and certain aircraft operations under part 
121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 22, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Daniel V. Meier Jr., (202) 267-3749.
    Correction of Publication: In the NPRM document (FR Doc. 96-13030) 
on

[[Page 30552]]

page 26036 in the issue of Thursday, May 23, 1996, make the following 
correction:
    In the ADDRESSES section on page 26036, in the first column, last 
line, the docket number was listed as 28537. This number should be 
changed to read 28586.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 12, 1996.
Joseph A. Conte,
Acting Assistant Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-15334 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 787 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 787

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 28, 2009.
Whereas metastatic breast cancer refers to Stage IV breast cancer when cancer 
        cells travel from the breast, either through the bloodstream or the 
        lymphatic system, to other parts of the body, including the bones, 
        liver, lungs, or brain, and continue to grow in their new location;
Whereas an estimated 192,370 women and 1,910 men in the United States will be 
        diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, and 62,280 women will be 
        diagnosed with in situ breast cancer;
Whereas nearly 30 percent of women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer will 
        develop Stage IV advanced or metastatic breast cancer;
Whereas in developing countries, the majority of women with breast cancer are 
        diagnosed with advanced stage or metastatic disease;
Whereas the statistic that 155,000 women and men are presently living with 
        metastatic breast cancer in the United States underscores the immediate 
        need for increased public awareness;
Whereas there currently is no cure for metastatic breast cancer, and metastatic 
        breast cancer frequently involves trying one treatment after another 
        with the goal of extending the best quality of life as possible;
Whereas scientists and researchers are conducting important research projects to 
        achieve breakthroughs in metastatic breast cancer research;
Whereas metastatic breast cancer is rarely discussed during Breast Cancer 
        Awareness Month, however those living with the disease should never feel 
        isolated or ignored;
Whereas metastatic Breast Cancer Awareness Day emphasizes the urgent need for 
        new, targeted breast cancer treatments that will provide a high quality 
        of life and long life expectancy for patients by making Stage IV cancer 
        a chronic, but not fatal disease;
Whereas the House of Representatives is an institution that can raise awareness 
        in the general public and the medical community of breast cancer; and
Whereas October 13, 2009, would be an appropriate date to designate as National 
        Metastatic Breast Cancer Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of National Metastatic Breast Cancer 
        Awareness Day;
            (2) encourages all people in the United States to become more 
        informed and aware of metastatic breast cancer; and
            (3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House to transmit a copy 
        of this resolution to the Metastatic Breast Cancer Network.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 794 

Calling for a runoff election in Afghanistan between the two top finishers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. DELAHUNT, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Calling for a runoff election in Afghanistan between the 

two top finishers. 

Whereas nearly one in four votes in last month’s Afghan 

presidential elections were cast at polling stations now 

subject to a recount and audit for possible fraud; 

Whereas approximately one-third of Mr. Karzai’s 3,100,000 

votes were cast at polling stations that face a recount 

and audit of ballot boxes; 

Whereas based on the criteria set by the Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC), a United Nations backed Afghan and international panel that is the ultimate arbiter 

of the election, almost 3,000 of the 23,000 polling stations would be subject to the fraud review; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 794 IH 

Whereas those polling stations account for a large proportion 

of ballots, some 1,350,000 of 5,660,000 total votes; 

Whereas the ECC said that it had found ‘‘clear and convincing evidence of fraud in a number of polling stations’’ 

in the southern and eastern provinces; 

Whereas the analysis also shows that slightly more than a 

quarter million of Mr. Karzai’s votes came from polling 

stations where he received exactly 600 ballots and no 

other candidate received a single vote; 

Whereas, on September 10, 2009, the ECC ordered the invalidation of certain ballots from 51 polling stations in 

Kandahar province and from 27 polling stations in 

Ghazni province, and ordered the International Election 

Commission (IEC) to invalidate results from 5 polling 

stations in Paktika province; 

Whereas between the election on August 20, 2009, and September 8, 2009, the ECC has received a total of 2,842 

election complaints; and 

Whereas Grant Kippen, a Canadian and the chairman of the 

ECC, said the irregularities found include ballots not 

being folded, meaning they would not fit in a ballot box 

slot, identically marked ballots, and overly large counts at 

polling stations: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls for 

2 a runoff election between the two top finishers. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS