alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David Chami

Price Law Group, P.C.

8245 N. 85th Way

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Tel: 818-600-5515

Fax: 866-401-1457

david@pricelawgroup.com

[Additional counsel appearing on signature page]

Attorneys for Plaintiff NICK FISHER

and the Classes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

NICK FISHER, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

ONE WAY FUNDING, LLC, a New York 

limited liability company,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:18-cv-00309-JZR

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Plaintiff Nick Fisher (“Fisher” or “Plaintiff”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

55(a), hereby moves to have this Court enter default against Defendant One Way Funding, LLC. 

Entry of Default is proposed against Defendant because they have failed to answer or otherwise 

respond to Fisher’s Complaint. One Way Funding, LLC was served on February 28, 2018 but 

have failed to respond.

This request is further support by the Affidavit of Default, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Case 2:18-cv-00309-DLR Document 13 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 5, 2018 NICK FISHER, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated,

By: _s/ Patrick H. Peluso

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys

David Chami

Price Law Group, P.C.

1204 E. Baseline Rd., Suite 102

Tempe, Arizona 85283

Tel: 866-881-2133

Fax: 866-401-1457

david@pricelawgroup.com

Steven L. Woodrow*

swoodrow@woodrowpeluso.com

Patrick H. Peluso*

ppeluso@woodrowpeluso.com

Woodrow & Peluso, LLC

3900 East Mexico Ave., Suite 300

Denver, Colorado 80210

Telephone: (720) 213-0675

Facsimile: (303) 927-0809

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Classes

* Pro Hac Vice 

Case 2:18-cv-00309-DLR Document 13 Filed 04/05/18 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, Patrick H. Peluso, hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of 

Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Default Judgment was served upon Defendant by causing such 

papers to be sent via Certified United States Mail to Defendant’s principal place of business, 

attention General Counsel.

/s/ Patrick H. Peluso

Case 2:18-cv-00309-DLR Document 13 Filed 04/05/18 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13003]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Information, Robotics and Intelligent 
Systems; Notice Of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Information, Robotics and 
Intelligent Systems (#1200).
    Date and time: June 12-13, 1996 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn 4610 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 
22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Maria Zemankova, Deputy Division Director, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1929.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Robotics and Machine Intelligence 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 20, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13003 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 571 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal Government should relinquish its temporary ownership interests in the General Motors Corporation and Chrysler Group, LLC, as soon as possible 

and should not micromanage or unduly intercede in management decisions of such companies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Mr. WALZ (for himself, Mr. ELLSWORTH, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Federal Government should relinquish its temporary 

ownership interests in the General Motors Corporation 

and Chrysler Group, LLC, as soon as possible and should 

not micromanage or unduly intercede in management 

decisions of such companies. 

Whereas the Federal Government is taking a significant ownership stake in Chrysler Group, LLC, and the General 

Motors Corporation; 

Whereas General Motors has entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy 

and Chrysler has gone through Chapter 11 bankruptcy; 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 571 IH 

Whereas Chrysler is receiving more than $12,000,000,000 in 

aid from the Federal Government and General Motors is 

receiving approximately $50,000,000,000; 

Whereas any use of taxpayer dollars for the Federal Government to take a share of ownership in the American automotive industry should be temporary; 

Whereas a prearranged time schedule for divestment of such 

Government share of ownership could create problems; 

Whereas the Obama administration has stated that ‘‘[t]he 

Government has no desire to own equity stakes in companies any longer than necessary, and will seek to dispose 

of its ownership interests as soon as practicable’’; 

Whereas the Obama administration has stated that ‘‘[t]he 

government will protect the taxpayers’ investment by 

managing its ownership stake in a hands-off, commercial 

manner. The government will not interfere with or exert 

control over day-to-day company operations’’; and 

Whereas public ownership of automobile companies presents 

a constant temptation to lawmakers to micromanage and 

unduly intercede in management decisions: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) after taking a temporary ownership interest 

4 in the United States automobile companies, the Fed5 eral Government should take all possible actions to 

6 protect taxpayer dollars and divest such ownership 

7 interest in such companies as quickly as possible; 

8 and 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 571 IH 

1 (2) the Federal Government should not micro2 manage and unduly intercede in management of the 

3 automobile companies in which it takes a temporary 

4 ownership interest. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)

PROMULGATED UNDER SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mikel H. Williams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 of DDi Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ MIKEL H. WILLIAMSMikel H. Williams
President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 25, 2012
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Corillian Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alex P. Hart,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ ALEX P. HART

Alex P. Hart
Chief Executive Officer and President
March 21, 2003
_________________________________________ 

 

_________________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131351 & (70) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly

DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Plaintiff-Appellant, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices and 

GAMAL ALMAWRI, as Next Friend of ISHAK 

ALMAWRI and MARWAN ALMAWRI, 

Plaintiffs, 

v 

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee,

and 

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 29, 2006 

Clerk
#### James JONES, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

No. 55316.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 2, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 31, 1989.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 1, 1989.

*779Michael C. Todt, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Daryl R. Hylton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of two counts of first degree robbery and sentenced as a persistent offender to two consecutive 15 year prison terms. We affirmed on direct appeal, *State v. Jones,*643 S.W.2d 34 (Mo.App.1982). Movant was identified by both victims as the man who robbed them at gun point. Three days after the robbery, movant was arrested with the personal papers of one of the victims and the other victim’s purse and driver’s license in his possession.

In his motion and sole point on appeal, movant contends his trial counsel refused to permit him to testify. Movant testified as to this contention at the evidentiary hearing. Movant’s trial counsel testified that, although she had no specific recollection of how she advised movant, it is her practice to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of testifying but to leave the ultimate decision up to the client. In denying relief, the motion court found as to this contention that movant’s testimony was not credible.

The motion court is not required to believe the testimony, even if uncontradicted, of a movant or any other witness at a Rule 29.15 hearing, and we defer to the motion court’s credibility determination. *Brummell v. State,*770 S.W.2d 379, 380, 381 (Mo.App.1989); *Leigh v. State,*673 S.W.2d 788, 790 (Mo.App.1984).

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

CRANDALL, P.J., and CRIST, J., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 4536** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. NICHOLAS ARMAND CLAY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00304

- WO

- 1 )

Submitted : December 27, 2012 Decided: January 15, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Louis C. Allen , III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Harry L. Hobgood , Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nicholas Armand Clay pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § § 922(g)(1) and 924(e) (2006). In the plea agreement, Clay reserved his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized and statements made subsequent to his arrest. On appeal, Clay argues that there was no probable cause to justify his arrest and that any evidence resulting from such arrest should have been suppressed. We affirm. We review factual findings underlying the district court’s denial of a moti on to suppress for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Foster , 634 F.3d 243, 246 (4th Cir. 2011). When a suppression motion has been denied, this court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the g overnment. Unite d States v. Farrior , 535 F.3d 210, 217 (4th Cir. 2008). This court grants great deference to factual findings based on credibility determinations. United
States v. Moses , 540 F.3d 263, 268

- 69 (4th Cir. 2008). Our review of the record leads us to conclud e that the district court did not err in find ing that there was sufficient probable cause to justify Clay’s arrest and denying the suppression motion.3 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts a nd legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    
    the
    Form 10-K
    of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
    hereof (the
    Form 10-K),
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
    or 78o(d)); and
    the information contained in the
    Form 10-K
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.  Michael
    K. Robinson
ex1046.htm


    
      

      

    


    December
4, 2008

     

    Mr.
Michael A. Miles

    1350 Lake
Road

    Lake
Forest, IL 60045

    


     

    Dear
Mike:

     

    This will
confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2009.

     

    1.           All
director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your
service on the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR
Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009, will be deferred and paid to you in accordance with this
letter agreement.

     

    2.           Fees
will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Procedures
for Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and restated, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).

     

    3.           On
the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the Stock
Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash and paid
to you in a lump sum by multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by
the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market value”)
during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation and any
affiliates, and cease rendering services.  Payment cannot be
accelerated.

     

    4.           In
the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of
death will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the
calendar month immediately preceding your death, and the amount paid to Pamela
Miles.  The payment contemplated by this paragraph 4 will be made on
the 30th
business day following the date of your death.

     

    If the
foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the
originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.

     

    


     

    


    Very
truly yours,

     

    /s/ Kenneth W. Wimberly

     

    Kenneth
W. Wimberly

    Corporate
Secretary

    


    


    


    


    


    Accepted
and agreed:

    


    


    /s/
Michael A. Miles       

    Michael
A. Miles
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1997-2
$ 214,068,614 6.35% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1997




         PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
            DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
        ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Feb-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Mar-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Apr-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 May-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jun-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jul-97   5,401,133   1,132,780           0    0.00%    5,047,013    2.42%
 Aug-97   5,191,596   1,104,199      13,654    0.08%    9,153,881    4.50%
 Sep-97   4,954,456   1,076,727      51,519    0.31%   10,754,585    5.42%
 Oct-97   5,411,593   1,050,509     206,866    1.29%   12,535,319    6.49%
 Nov-97   6,637,674   1,021,873     723,920    4.65%   12,719,741    6.81%
 Dec-97   6,165,042     986,749   1,062,203    7.03%   12,671,052    6.99%
        ____________ ___________ ___________
 Totals  33,761,495   6,372,836   2,058,163

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the informat
      is from activity of the previous month.
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1997-2
$ 214,068,614 6.35% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1997




         PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
            DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
        ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Feb-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Mar-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Apr-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 May-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jun-97           0           0           0    0.00%            0    0.00%
 Jul-97   5,401,133   1,132,780           0    0.00%    5,047,013    2.42%
 Aug-97   5,191,596   1,104,199      13,654    0.08%    9,153,881    4.50%
 Sep-97   4,954,456   1,076,727      51,519    0.31%   10,754,585    5.42%
 Oct-97   5,411,593   1,050,509     206,866    1.29%   12,535,319    6.49%
 Nov-97   6,637,674   1,021,873     723,920    4.65%   12,719,741    6.81%
 Dec-97   6,165,042     986,749   1,062,203    7.03%   12,671,052    6.99%
        ____________ ___________ ___________
 Totals  33,761,495   6,372,836   2,058,163

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the informat
      is from activity of the previous month.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Spark Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Adam S. Berger                                 
|Adam S. Berger Chief Executive Officer May 14, 2009



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brett A. Zane                                 
|Brett A. Zane Chief Financial Officer May 14, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spark Networks, Inc.
and will be retained by Spark Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:18-cr-00266-DLR Document 1 Filed 02/03/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00266-DLR Document 1 Filed 02/03/18 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00266-DLR Document 1 Filed 02/03/18 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00266-DLR Document 1 Filed 02/03/18 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00266-DLR Document 1 Filed 02/03/18 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANTTO

SECTION906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEYACTOF 2002(18U.S.C. 1350)

 

Inconnection withthisReport on Form10-Qforthe three and nine monthsended June 30, 2019(the “Report”)ofPennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”),asfiled withthe SecuritiesandExchange Commissiononthe datehereof, I,ArthurH. Penn, ChiefExecutive Officerofthe Registrant,herebycertify, tothe best ofmyknowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplieswiththe requirementsof Section13(a)or15(d)ofthe SecuritiesExchange Act of1934, as amended;and

 

(2)  The informationcontainedinthe Report fairlypresents, inall material respects, the financial conditionandresultsof operationsoftheRegistrant.

 

| /s/ Arthur H. Penn |
|--------------------|
| Name:              |   | Arthur H. Penn |
| Title:             |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:              |   | August 7, 2019 |