alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-14-00448-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ROLANDO ROMERO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 94th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER 

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to supplement the 

reporter’s record. The reporter’s record in this cause was filed on November 10, 2014. 

Appellant has advised this Court that the record does not contain the motion to suppress 

evidence hearing conducted on or about June 5, 2014. 
2

When a relevant item has been omitted from the reporter’s record, the appellate 

court may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate 

court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the omitted items. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(d). Accordingly, appellant’s motion to supplement the reporter’s record is 

GRANTED. 

The court reporter of the 94th District Court of Nueces County is directed to prepare 

a supplemental reporter’s record in this causes to include the motion to suppress 

evidence hearing conducted on or about June 5, 2014. The supplemental record shall 

be filed with this Court within 30 days from the date of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

21st day of November, 2014.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00516-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.O. and A.O., Children

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02019

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 15, 2014

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

This is an appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant father’s parental rights. 

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because the trial court granted appellant’s motion 

for new trial. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We order that no costs be 

assessed against appellant because he is indigent. 

PER CURIAM

1 The Honorable John D. Gabriel is the presiding judge of the 131st Civil District Court. However, the order of 

termination was signed by Associate Judge Charles Montemayor.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 702 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 702

   Directing the Comptroller General of the United States to submit 
reports ensuring the effectiveness of Federal programs and amending the 
Rules of the House of Representatives to require that certain standing 
 committees of the House hold at least one hearing on each such report 
                 that falls within their jurisdiction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2009

Mr. Reichert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Directing the Comptroller General of the United States to submit 
reports ensuring the effectiveness of Federal programs and amending the 
Rules of the House of Representatives to require that certain standing 
 committees of the House hold at least one hearing on each such report 
                 that falls within their jurisdiction.

    Resolved, That (a) the House of Representatives directs the 
Comptroller General to submit to Congress a report on the effectiveness 
of each program of the Federal Government, within two years after the 
program begins to be implemented, to determine the effectiveness of the 
program and whether the program is carrying out the intent of Congress.
    (b) Clause 2 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(f)(1) Within 30 legislative days after any standing committee 
receives a report from the Comptroller General respecting the 
effectiveness of a program within its legislative jurisdiction, that 
committee shall hold a hearing on the subject matter of that report. If 
the program is authorized for 10 or more years or has an open-ended 
authorization, then, at that hearing, the committee shall determine 
appropriate intervals for additional hearings respecting the 
effectiveness of that program.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the Committee on 
Appropriations, the Committee on House Administration, the Committee on 
Rules, and the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan, the
2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-40524), and in the related Prospectuses, of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated
January 12, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in the annual report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31,
2000.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
April 9, 2001

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Net 1 UEPS
Technologies, Inc. (Net1) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Serge Belamant and Herman Kotze, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Net1, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
that to their knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and            
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                          
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Net1.



|Date: August 27, 2009 | /s/: Serge Belamant                   
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------
|                      | Name: Serge Belamant                  
|                      | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman  
|                      | of the Board                          
|                      |                                       
|Date: August 27, 2009 | /s/: Herman Kotze                     
|                      | Name: Herman Kotze                    
|                      | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
|                      | Secretary                             

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL BAILEY

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

RAQUEL ARELLANO

Assistant United States Attorney

AZ State Bar No.: 011796

CHRISTINE A. MELTON 

Assistant United States Attorney

AZ State Bar No.: 021649

United States Courthouse

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800

Tucson, Arizona 85701

raquel.arellano@usdoj.gov

christine.melton@usdoj.gov 

Telephone: (520) 620-7300

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Robert Francis Krebs,

 Defendant.

CR 18-00263-TUC-JGZ (JR)

NOTICE OF CONFESSIONS, 

ADMISSIONS AND STATEMENTS 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.1

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its attorneys undersigned, gives 

notice pursuant to Local Rule 16.1, that all confessions, admissions and statements 

provided in government disclosure may be introduced into evidence by the government at 

the trial in this matter. See United States v. Hall, 742 F.2d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.1984). 

Respectfully submitted this 28th day of August, 2019.

MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

s/ Raquel Arellano 

RAQUEL ARELLANO

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 77 Filed 08/28/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by

other means this 28th day of August, 2019, to:

Jorge Leonardo Costales, Esq.

Gregory Jon Berger, Esq. Attorneys for the Defendant 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 77 Filed 08/28/19 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Interest of E.G., a Minor, Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 69536.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 23, 1996.

Steven D. Miller, St. Louis, for appellant.

Andrew T. Kotschar, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, E.G., a minor, challenges the trial court’s judgment finding him within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court based on a single count of first degree tampering in violation of § 569.080.1(2), RSMo 1994. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Graham K. Cooper, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 3, 2010



| |  |                                       |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Graham K. Cooper                  |  | 
| |  | Graham K. Cooper                      |  | 
| |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Michele Walker Harris LLC and Edgar S 

Harris LLC, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Larkey Process Company, Karen Thadani, 

Vinay Thadani, Shiraz M Aladin, Manish 

Sawhney, Andrew M Hull, and Denise 

Holliday, 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00374-PHX-JAT

ORDER 

 A complaint was filed in this case of February 2, 2018 on behalf of two limited 

liability companies. The complaint was filed “pro se” by the companies. 

 Corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through 

an attorney. D-Beam Ltd. P'ship v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th 

Cir. 2004); In re America West Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir. 1994); Rowland v. 

Cal. Mens Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993). 

 In Rowland, the Supreme Court held that artificial entities cannot proceed in forma 

pauperis. 506 U.S. at 196. As a result, Plaintiffs must pay the filing fee. Additionally, 

because limited liability companies cannot appear pro se, the Court will give Plaintiffs 

time to obtain counsel. However, if counsel does not appear within the time set forth 

below, the complaint in this case will be stricken and the case will be closed. 

 Therefore, 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied. 

Plaintiffs have until February 12, 2018 to pay the filing fee or the Clerk of the Court shall 

close this case (and enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice) without further order 

of this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (if this case is still open because Plaintiffs 

paid the filing fee by February 12, 2018) Plaintiffs shall obtain counsel who files a notice 

of appearance by March 2, 2018, or the Court will strike the complaint and dismiss this 

case. 

 Dated this 5th day of February, 2018.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(1)(Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

|                                     | 2000 |  | 1999 |        | 1998 |   | 1997   |  | 1996 |       
|------------------------------------ | ---- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------
|                                    
|EARNINGS                             |      |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |       
|Pre-tax income (loss)                |      |  | $    | 123    |      | $ | 40,092 |  | $    | 55,069
|Fixed charges                        |      |  |      | 13,024 |      |   | 13,109 |  |      | 15,865
|                                     |      |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |       
|Total (a)                            |      |  | $    | 13,147 |      | $ | 53,201 |  | $    | 70,934
|                                     |      |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |       
|                                    
|FIXED CHARGES                        |      | 
|Interest expense and amortization of |      | 
|debt discount and premium on all     |      | 
|indebtedness                         |      |  | $    | 11,889 |      | $ | 12,221 |  | $    | 15,009
|Interest portion of rental expense   |      |  |      | 1,135  |      |   | 888    |  |      | 856   
|                                     |      |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |       
|Total fixed charges (b)              |      |  | $    | 13,024 |      | $ | 13,109 |  | $    | 15,865
|                                     |      |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |       
|                                    
|Ratio of earnings to fixed           |      | 
|charges (a)/(b)                      |      |  |      | 1.0x   |      |   | 4.1x   |  |      | 4.5x  

|(1) |  | For
          purposes of determining this ratio, pre-tax income (loss) consists of income
          before income taxes, cumulative effect of accounting change (1999) and
          extraordinary loss (1997), plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest
          expense and the portion of operating leases that management believes are
          representative of the interest factor.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | Earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges by $191.4 million in 1996.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

INFRINGEMENT CLAIM CHART FOR BLUETOOTH PRODUCTS

Case 2:18-cv-00420-JJT Document 1-2 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5
US Patent 

RE41,685

10. A light source The MagicLight 

Bluetooth Bulb is a light 

source.

comprising: an optical 

cavity

The opaque plastic 

dome creates an optical 

cavity.

a plurality of first 

light-emitting diodes 

each of which is a 

phosphor lightemitting diode that 

emits white light

The bulb has 12 SMD 

(surface mounted 

diodes) comprising a

plurality of phosphor 

LEDs that emit white 

light.

Case 2:18-cv-00420-JJT Document 1-2 Filed 02/06/18 Page 2 of 5
each first lightemitting diode 

comprising a diode 

encased in a lighttransmitting package;

Each first LED is 

encased in a light 

transmitting package.

a plurality of second 

light- emitting diodes 

each of which emits 

non-white light, each 

second light- emitting 

diode comprising a 

diode encased in a 

light- transmitting 

package

Each bulb has three 

tri-LED SMD chips.

Each tri-LED chip has a 

second non- white 

(red) LED encased in a 

light transmitting 

package.

wherein the first and 

second light-emitting 

diodes are arranged 

to emit light into the 

optical cavity such 

that mixing of 

spectral outputs from 

the first and second

light-emitting diodes 

occurs in the optical 

cavity.

Each bulb has the 

plurality of the LEDs 

that emit white light 

and the plurality of 

non-white light LEDs 

arranged to emit light 

into the optical cavity 

so that mixing occurs 

in the optical cavity.

Red LED

Case 2:18-cv-00420-JJT Document 1-2 Filed 02/06/18 Page 3 of 5
11. A light source of 

claim 10, further

comprising at least 

one third lightemitting diode having 

a spectral output

different from those 

of the first and 

second light-emitting 

diodes.

Each tri-LED SMD chip 

has a third LED

(green) that has a 

spectral output 

different than the first 

(white) and second 

(red) LED’s.

12. A light source of 

claim 11, wherein the 

spectral output of the 

second light-emitting 

diodes is a red 

output.

Each tri-LED chip has a 

second non- white 

(red) LED encased in a 

light transmitting 

package.

13. A light source of 

claim 11, wherein the

spectral output of the 

third light-emitting

diode is a green

output.

Each tri-LED chip has a 

third (green) LED 

encased in a light 

transmitting package.

Red LED

Green LED

Case 2:18-cv-00420-JJT Document 1-2 Filed 02/06/18 Page 4 of 5
14. A light source of 

claim 13, further

comprising at least 

one fourth lightemitting diode having 

a blue output.

Each tri-LED chip has a 

fourth (blue) LED 

encased in a light 

Blue LED transmitting package.

Case 2:18-cv-00420-JJT Document 1-2 Filed 02/06/18 Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ring Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert “Steve” Owens, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of            the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) This Report on 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) I further certify to the best of my knowledge that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ring Energy, Inc. 

 

 

| Date: March 30, 2009 | By /s/ Robert “Steve” Owens |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | Robert “Steve” Owens, |
|--------|-----------------------------------|

|   | Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------|
#### Wilson, d. b. a. E. A. Wilson Motor Co., *v.*Smith.

(No. 23097

Decided October 21, 1931.)

*Mr. G. G. Sedgwick,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Gordon D. Kinder*and *Mr. William V. Frazier, Jr.,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.1






CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Silver Reserve
      Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form
      10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      May 14, 2007




/s/ Todd
      D.
      Montgomery


Todd
      D.
      Montgomery, CEO and Director


(Chief
      Executive Officer of Silver Reserve Corp.)




Dated:
      May 14, 2007




/s/ Randal
      Ludwar


Randal
      Ludwar, Chief Financial Officer


(Chief
      Financial Officer of Silver Reserve Corp.)






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Silver Reserve Corp. and will be retained by Silver Reserve Corp. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.