alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63285.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 5, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 10, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 21, 1993.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*794ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion filed after he pleaded guilty as a prior offender and Class X offender to second degree trafficking of drugs. We affirm, finding no clear error in such denial. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

We further find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties a memorandum for their use only.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Patrick Bidwill, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Bidwill, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00719-PHX-DLR 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a self-represented litigant, filed this action on March 6, 2018 and 

submitted a check to pay the $400 filing fee. The next day, the Court dismissed this case 

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court explained that Plaintiff's complaint 

raised a state law claim against Arizona residents and, therefore, should be filed in a state 

court rather than a federal court. 

 Since then, the Court has learned that the check Plaintiff used to pay his $400 

filing fee was returned due to insufficient funds. The Court charges a $53 not sufficient 

funds ("NSF") fee for any payment returned or denied for insufficient funds. (See United 

States District Court District of Arizona Fee Schedule, available at 

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fee%20schedule.pdf.) 

 The fact that Plaintiff's filing fee payment was returned due to insufficient funds 

suggests that Plaintiff might lack the financial resources to pay it. Plaintiff is advised that 

a litigant who lacks the resources to pay the fees and costs associated with his case can 

Case 2:18-cv-00719-DLR Document 6 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

file an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. This 

application is publicly available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/fee-waiverapplication-forms/application-proceed-district-court-without-prepaying-fees-or. Because 

it is possible that Plaintiff lacks the financial resources to pay the $400 filing fee, the 

Court will give him the opportunity to retroactively apply to proceed without prepaying 

fees or costs. Plaintiff remains liable, however, for the $53 NSF fee. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that, by no later than April 6, 2018, Plaintiff shall do one of the 

following: (1) pay the $400 filing fee and the $53 NSF fee by money order or, if 

Plaintiff lacks the financial resources to pay the filing fee (2) pay the $53 NSF fee by 

money order and file a properly completed Application to Proceed in District Court 

Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. 

 Dated this 20th day of March, 2018. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00719-DLR Document 6 Filed 03/20/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
December 31, 2013 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn
|Arthur H. Penn    
|February 5, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 819 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 819

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for 
division of the question on the legislative proposals involved to allow 
                  separate votes on disparate matters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2009

Mr. Posey submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for 
division of the question on the legislative proposals involved to allow 
                  separate votes on disparate matters.

    Resolved, That clause 5(a) of rule XVI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)'' and by 
inserting at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(2) In deciding upon the question of division, the division shall 
depend on the legislative propositions involved and not upon 
grammatical structure.''.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 6(c) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by inserting ``, or a rule or order that 
would waive clause 5 of rule XVI'' before the period.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of DDiCorp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Michael Dodson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 12,2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                          22,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                       809
<INVENTORY>                                     16,781
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,727
<PP&E>                                         402,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 561,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,970
<BONDS>                                        348,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           394
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   561,889
<SALES>                                        559,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               707,142
<CGS>                                          167,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  648,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,064
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,430
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,085
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 829 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 15, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 2892) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. The conference report shall be considered as read. All points of order against 

the conference report and against its consideration are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the conference report to its adoption without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion 

to recommit if applicable. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
I, G. Ross McDonald, Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Atna Resources Ltd. (the Company);2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;4.
The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and
have:  d)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this annual report is being prepared;e)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); andf)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5.     The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function): c)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; andd)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and 6.      The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: March 1, 2005 /s/ G. Ross McDonald
G. Ross McDonaldChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David BergerDavid
      BergerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      14, 2011
NUMBER 13-09-00541-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ANTHONY SATTERWHITE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Anthony Satterwhite, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. 
2

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed

the 7th day of January, 2010.
EXHIBIT 32.1

| | 
| | 

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of
Omega Flex, Inc. (the Company), that, to his knowledge:

(a)       
          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
          June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
          Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: September 6, 2005 |  | Omega Flex, Inc.BY: /S/  Kevin R. Hoben  
 Kevin R. Hoben  Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | BY: /S/ E. Lynn Wilkinson 
E. Lynn Wilkinson Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is not deemed to
be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of White Dental Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month periods ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nancy White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Michael White, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Nancy White


Nancy White


Chief Executive Officer


November 10, 2010








/s/ Michael White


Michael White


Chief Financial Officer


November 10, 2010
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of iVoice, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerome R. Mahoney,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: March 31, 2008

                                                 /s/ Jerome R. Mahoney
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                 Jerome R. Mahoney
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0460

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BRANDON LEE BLACK,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Heather M. Perry, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0460
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MATTHEW CRAIG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 832 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 1996 / Presidential Documents 24663

Proclamation 6895 of May 13, 1996

Peace Officers Memorial Day and Police Week, 1996

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Despite the dangers they face while patrolling our Nation’s cities, neighborhoods, and highways, America’s law enforcement officers continue to serve

with commitment and distinction every day. They put themselves in harm’s

way to safeguard our fellow citizens, and their dedication to the rule of

law is essential to maintaining a just and orderly society. Each year, Police

Week is a welcome opportunity to recognize the brave men and women

of the law enforcement professions, and on Peace Officers Memorial Day

we pause to honor those who have given their lives while protecting others.

According to recent figures, 161 law enforcement officers were killed in

the line of duty during 1995. And let us not forget the law enforcement

personnel who died in the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building

in Oklahoma City on April 19—the single deadliest day in law enforcement

history. Since police deaths were first recorded in this country, in 1794,

more than 14,000 officers have lost their lives working to keep the peace

in our communities. On average, more than 66,000 are assaulted every

year, and some 24,000 are injured.

To pay tribute to the law enforcement officers who have made the ultimate

sacrifice for our country and to voice our appreciation for all those who

currently serve on the front lines of the battle against crime, the Congress,

by joint resolution approved October 1, 1962 (76 Stat. 676), has authorized

and requested the President to designate May 15 of each year as ‘‘Peace

Officers Memorial Day,’’ and the week in which it falls as ‘‘Police Week,’’

and by Public Law 103–322 (36 U.S.C. 175) has directed that the flag

be flown at half-staff on Peace Officers Memorial Day.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, do hereby proclaim May 15, 1996, as Peace Officers Memorial

Day, and May 12 through May 18, 1996, as Police Week. I call upon the

people of the United States to observe these occasions with appropriate

ceremonies, activities, and programs. I also request the Governors of the

United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the appropriate

officials of all units of government, to direct that the flag be flown at

half-staff on Peace Officers Memorial Day on all buildings, grounds, and

naval vessels throughout the United States and all areas under its jurisdiction

and control. In addition, I invite all Americans to display the flag at halfstaff from their homes on that day.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirteenth day

of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-six, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 96–12419

Filed 5–14–96; 11:54 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twentieth.

œ–
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VERONICA MONTOYA,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF

THE ESTATE OF JESSICA MONTOYA,

DECEASED,

Appellant,

v.

NICHIRIN

- FLEX U.S.A., INC.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00070

- CV

Appeal from

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2011

- DCV

- 10027)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , o n the judgment and all

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY AUGUST , 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.