alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON

Senior U.S. District Judge: Raner C. Collins Date: November 20, 2019

USA v. Scott Daniel Warren Case Number: CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (DTF)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Anna Wright/Nathaniel Walters/Glenn McCormick

Attorney for Defendant: Gregory Kuykendall/Amy Knight (Retained)

Deputy Clerk: Sherry Gammon

Court Reporter: Erica McQuillen

Interpreter: N/A 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL: Day 6

9:24 a.m. – In absence of the jury, the Court issues a ruling regarding the previously argued issue of 

the testimony of Defense witness Susannah Brown. The Court does not find the witness unavailable 

and her testimony is not admitted. 

The jury enters at 9:40 a.m.

A stipulation regarding the material witnesses is read into the record by the Court. 

The Defense rests at 9:41 a.m. 

The Government does not call rebuttal witnesses. 

9:42 a.m. – The Government’s closing argument is presented by Mr. Walters. 

Recess taken 10:07 a.m. - 10:17 a.m.

The Defendant’s closing argument is presented by Mr. Kuykendall. 

Recess taken 11:17 a.m. - 11:27 a.m.

The Government’s rebuttal closing argument is presented by Mr. Walters. 

The jury is instructed at 11:57 a.m. 

12:18 p.m. – Jurors #31, 41, 35 and 36 are selected as alternates.

Lunch recess is taken 12:20 p.m.-1:25 p.m. Lunch is provided to the jurors and the alternates. The 

alternates are excused and jurors begin deliberation.

A verdict is received at 3:15 p.m.

The jury enters at 3:35 p.m. The Defendant is found Not Guilty as to Counts 2 and 3 of the 

Indictment. 

The jury is polled. 

The jury is excused at 3:51 p.m. 
USA v. Scott Daniel Warren Date: November 20, 2019 

Case Number: CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (DTF) Page 2 of 2

Page 2 of 2

In absence of the jury, the Court issues a ruling as to the Defendant’s case 17-00341MJ-TUC-RCC. 

(See separate minute entry filed in the Defendant’s case 17-00341MJ-TUC-RCC). 

Jury Trial: 2 Hours 43 Minutes

Start: 9:24 a.m. Stop: 3:51 p.m.

Jury deliberation: 2 Hours 10 Minutes

1:25 p.m. – 3:35 p.m.
H. Res. 788 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 1, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 3183) making appropriations for energy and 

water development and related agencies for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the conference report 

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. 

All points of order against the conference report are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

conference report to its adoption without intervening motion 

except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 7, 2007                              |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                              |   |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J. ZATTA                          |   |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                   |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 orany other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30750 Conference Calendar

LARRY ROBINSON, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF SHREVEPORT; POLICE DEPARTMENT OF SHREVEPORT; CITY COUNCIL OF SHREVEPORT; ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1089

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Robinson, Sr., # 320772, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the relevant portion of which has been redesignated as § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I) by § 804 of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). Robinson argues that the defendants violated his constitutional rights when twoNo. 96-30750 - 2 - vehicles were towed from his home. We have reviewed the record and Robinson's brief and AFFIRM on the facts as found and authorities cited by the magistrate judge in his report and recommendation filed May 30, 1996, which was adopted by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Neal Allen BIGELOW, Appellant.

No. WD 48351.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 13, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 1994.

Richard McFadin, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals conviction of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine), § 195.202.1, RSMo Supp.1991.

Judgment Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 446 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 446

Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Administrator of 
 the Environmental Protection Agency and the Director of the Office of 
  Management and Budget to provide certain documents to the House of 
Representatives relating to the Environmental Protection Agency's April 
 proposed finding that greenhouse gas emissions are a danger to public 
                          health and welfare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2009

    Mr. Sensenbrenner submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Administrator of 
 the Environmental Protection Agency and the Director of the Office of 
  Management and Budget to provide certain documents to the House of 
Representatives relating to the Environmental Protection Agency's April 
 proposed finding that greenhouse gas emissions are a danger to public 
                          health and welfare.

    Resolved, That the President is requested and the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency and the Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget are directed to furnish the House of 
Representatives, not later than 14 days after the adoption of this 
resolution, all documents, including telephone and electronic mail 
records, logs and calendars, and records of internal discussions in the 
possession of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
or the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, relating to the 
following:
            (1) The untitled, undated memo marked ``Deliberative--
        Attorney Client Privilege'', which begins ``The NPRM fails to 
        articulate the process by which the Administrator came to the 
        conclusion on p. 30''.
            (2) Interagency comments or documents related to the 
        Environmental Protection Agency's April proposed finding that 
        greenhouse gas emissions are a danger to public health and 
        welfare.
            (3) Cost benefit or systematic risk analysis related to the 
        Environmental Protection Agency's April proposed finding that 
        greenhouse gas emissions are a danger to public health and 
        welfare.
            (4) Scientific evidence or opinion that demonstrates health 
        effects of greenhouse gases.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-30091 Summary Calendar

__________________ GEORGE RAYMOND SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-3138"B"

- - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * George Raymond Spencer appeals the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights complaint wherein he alleged that his constitutional rights were violated in connection with his conviction. By failing to brief the issue whether the district court erred by dismissing his complaint, Spencer has abandoned this argument on appeal. See Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex. , 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993). Further, the district court's dismissal of the complaint under Heck v.No. 96-30091 -2- Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994), was not an abuse of discretion.
See Booker v. Koonce , 2 F.3d 114, 115 (5th Cir. 1993). This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Spencer's motion to enlarge the record on appeal is DENIED. Spencer is warned that any future frivolous filings will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Spencer should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
IOMED, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      16,709,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,624,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,000
<INVENTORY>                                    876,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,208,000
<PP&E>                                        4,431,00
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,648,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,201,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,363,000
<BONDS>                                        187,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,881,000
<COMMON>                                     34,408,00
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,638,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,201,000
<SALES>                                      8,489,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,277,000
<CGS>                                        3,890,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,838,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (391,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             930,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,100,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,100,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,100,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 760 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 760

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 23, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 324) to establish the Santa Cruz Valley 
National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27362-27363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13660]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 12, 1996.
    Time: 6 p.m.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Michael D. Hirsch, Parklawn Building, Room 9C-
18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Telephone: 301, 443-
1000.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 14, 1996.
    Time: 12 p.m.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Michael D. Hirsch, Parklawn Building, Room 9C-
18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Telephone: 301, 443-
1000.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 20, 1996.
    Time: 8;30 a.m.
    Place: The Latham Hotel Georgetown, 3000 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 2007.
    Contact Person: Phyllis D. Artis, Parklawn Building, Room 9C-26, 
5600 Fishers Lane,

[[Page 27363]]

Rockville, MD 20857. Telephone: 301, 443-6470.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13660 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Xianping Wang, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Xinhua China LTD., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xinhua China LTD. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Xinhua China LTD.





Date: December 4, 2012





/s/  "Xianping Wang"Xianping Wang

Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Xinhua China LTD. and will be retained by Xinhua China LTD. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41226

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR HUGO PRESAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-01-CR-11-1

--------------------

June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor Hugo Presas appeals the district court’s judgment

following his conviction for one count of illegal reentry into

the United States, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Presas first

argues that the 16 level sentencing enhancement he received

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) violated his due process

rights. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by United
No. 01-41226

-2-

States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 1997), and he

raises the issue only to preserve it for possible further review. 

 Presas next argues that the U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 enhancement

violates the rule of lenity. He concedes that this argument is

likewise foreclosed by United States v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310 (5th

Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1105 (2002), and he raises

this issue only to preserve it for possible further review. 

Because the issues Presas raises are foreclosed by our precedent,

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13065]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2852; (Amendment #1]


Illinois Declaration of Disaster Loan Area

    In accordance with notices from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency dated May 9 and May 10, 1996, the above-numbered Declaration is 
hereby amended to include Lawrence, Madison, and Monroe Counties in the 
State of Illinois as a disaster area due to damages caused by severe 
storms and flooding beginning on April 28, 1996 and continuing.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Bond, Crawford, 
Jersey, Macoupin, Montgomery, Richland, and Wabash in Illinois; 
Jefferson, St. Charles, and Ste. Genevieve Counties in Missouri; and 
Knox and Sullivan Counties in Indiana may be filed until the specified 
date at the previously designated location.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is July 5, 1996, and for 
loans for economic injury the deadline is February 6, 1997.
    The economic injury number for the State of Indiana is 888900.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-13065 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P