alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1







SUBSIDIARIES OF CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES
COMPANY LIMITED



The particulars of the Company’s principal
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 are as follows:



|Name
        of Company                                    |  | Jurisdiction
        of 
Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Shantou Airlines Company Limited                           |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Zhuhai Airlines Company Limited                            |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Xiamen Airlines Company Limited                            |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Guizhou Airlines Company Limited                           |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Chongqing Airlines Company Limited                         |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Guangzhou Nanland Air Catering Company Limited             |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Guangzhou Baiyun International Logistic Company
Limited    |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Xinjiang Civil Aviation Property Management Limited        |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|China Southern Airlines Group Air Catering Company Limited |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Nan Lung International Freight Limited                     |  | Hong Kong                             
|                                                           |  |                                       
|Beijing Southern Airlines Ground Services Company Limited  |  | PRC                                   
|                                                           |  |                                       
|China Southern Airlines Henan Airlines Company Limited     |  | PRC
#### Christopher BARBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66597.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 14, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 12, 1995.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Christopher Barber, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2022 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|                    |        |                         |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn |
| Name:              |   | Arthur H. Penn          |
| Title:             |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:              |   | August 3, 2022          |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15080]




[[Page 30228]]


Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), 
Scientific Advisory Board (SAB)

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Title 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following Committee 
meeting:

    Date of Meeting: July 9, 1996 from 0800 to approximately 1735, 
July 10, 1996 from 0800 to approximately 1730, and July 11, 1996 
from 0800 to approximately 1240.
    Place: Federal Highway Administration Conference Room, 901 N. 
Stuart Street, Ste. 304, Arlington, VA.
    Matters to be Considered: Research and Development Proposals and 
continuing projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and 
Development Programs funds in excess of $1M will be reviewed.
    This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific 
Advisory Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

    For Further Information Contact: Ms. Kimberly Kay, Labat-Anderson 
Incorporated, 8000 Westpark Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102 or telephone 
703-506-1400, extension 552.

    Dated: June 7, 1996.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-15080 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
2008 Annual Salary Information



 Exhibit 10.22 
 SALARY INFORMATION FOR CEO, CFO 
 AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 The following table sets forth as of February 18, 2009, the current annual salary of WellPoint, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. None of the other “Named Executive Officers” were employed by the Company as of December 31, 2008. The other “Named Executive Officers” are as determined for the Company’s
Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which was based on total compensation for 2007 (less the amount of Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings) as required by the Instructions to
Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K. The Company has not yet determined the amount of non-equity incentive plan compensation for 2008 and therefore the identities of the other Named Executive Officers for the Company’s Proxy Statement for its
2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are not yet known. 
  

				
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	 Salary

	 Angela F. Braly
	  	$	1,144,000
	 Wayne S. DeVeydt
	  	$	700,000
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1480]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency


National Conservation Review Group; Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Service Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Conservation Review Group will meet to consider 
recommendations from State and County Conservation Review Groups with 
respect to the operational features of the Agricultural Conservation 
Program (ACP), the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), and the 
Emergency Conservation Program (ECP). Comments and suggestions will be 
received prior to the NCRG meeting concerning the ACP, CRP, and ECP 
administered by the Farm Service Agency (FSA).

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for February 29, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at United States Department of 
Agriculture (USDA), South Building, room 5066, at 14th and Independence 
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Zavodny, FSA, USDA, P.O. Box 
2415, room 4768, South Building, Washington, DC, 20013-2415, telephone 
202-720-7333.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Conservation Review Group 
meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on February 29, 1996, at the 
USDA South Building, room 5066, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, 
Washington, DC. Meeting sessions will be open to the public.
    The agenda will include consideration of State and County 
Conservation Review Group recommendations for changes in the 
administrative procedures and policy guidelines of the ACP, CRP, and 
ECP. An opportunity will be provided for the public to present comments 
at the meeting on these conservation and environmental programs 
administered by FSA.
    Because of time constraints and anticipated participation from 
interested individuals and groups, comments will be limited to not more 
than 5 minutes. Individuals or groups interested in making 
recommendations may also make them in writing and submit them by 
February 15, 1996, to Cheryl Zavodny, FSA, USDA, P.O. Box 2415, room 
4768-S, Washington, DC 20013-2415. The meeting may also include 
discussion of current procedures, criteria, and guidelines relevant to 
the implementation of these programs.
    Because of limited space, persons desiring to attend the meeting 
should call Cheryl Zavodny at 202-720-7333 to make reservations.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on January 22, 1996.
Grant Buntrock,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 96-1480 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Andre ELGIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 62482.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 10, 1993.

Henry Robertson, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Andre Elgin, appeals from judgments of conviction of two counts of rape and two counts of sodomy. He was sentenced to a total of thirty-three years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jun Wang,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Jun WangJun
                WangChief
                Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Michael Lee Beitman, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Correct Clear Solutions, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-17-03829-PHX-JAT (BSB)

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) from the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 67) recommending that default against Defendant Gruenberg be 

set aside. Neither party has objected to the R&R. See generally United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the 

district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo 

if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 67) is accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 

59) is denied; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the default entered by the Clerk on March 18, 

2019 (Doc. 60) is set aside. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion at Doc. 61 is granted to the extent 

specified above. 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Clerk of Court is ordered to send Plaintiff a 

service packet for Defendant Gruenberg; Plaintiff shall fill out the service packet for 

Defendant Gruenberg care of his counsel, Denise Troy, who has agreed to accept service 

on his behalf (Doc. 76); Plaintiff is ordered to return the service packet to the Clerk’s Office 

within twenty-one (21) days; the Clerk’s Office is directed to forward the service packet to 

the United States Marshal for service, and that service (by waiver or personal service) on 

Defendant Gruenberg be made within sixty (60) days at government expense by the United 

States Marshal or his authorized representative. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion seeking Defendant 

Gruenberg’s address (Doc. 69) is denied as moot because his counsel has agreed to accept 

service. 

 Dated this 17th day of May, 2019.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. JERROD SCOTT TURVIN , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 17

- 0 297 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2013

- 455163

- 0 01 The Honorable Jeffrey A. Rueter, Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Adena J. Astrowsky Counsel for Respondent
Jerrod Scott Turvin , Douglas Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and Chief Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 1-23-2018STATE v. TURVIN Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Jerrod Scott Turvin seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post

- convic tion relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. St ate v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has bu rden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2033

LT Case No. 2019-DR-002035

_____________________________

SARAH AFTAB MIAN F/K/A

SARAH ALI ASAD,

Appellant,

v.

ASAD ALI SHEIKH,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.

Michael J. Rudisill, Judge.

Sarah A. Mian, Lake Mary, pro se.

Asad Ali Sheikh, Sanford, pro se.

January 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, C.J., SOUD, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00745-CV

Keeann DEVORA, Craig Owen, and Keller Williams Realty,

Appellants

v.

Tavaris J. SLAUGHTER, Individually, and TJ Slaughter Enterprises, LLC,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-13013

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the parties’ motion to dismiss the 

appeal is GRANTED, the trial court’s judgment is SET ASIDE, and we REMAND this matter to 

the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. 

We order costs of appeal taxed against the party who incurred them. 

SIGNED March 25, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

1 The Honorable Renee Yanta is the presiding judge of the 150th District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The judgment 

in this case was signed by the Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, former presiding judge of the 150th District Court, Bexar 

County, Texas.
Order entered November 25 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00626

- CV
NEW 99 ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant

V.

MATHESON TRI

- GAS, INC., Appellee
On Appeal fro m the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 07389

ORDER
Before the Court is appellant’s November 23, 2020 unopposed fourth motion for an extension of time to file its brief on the merits. Appellant requests a fou r

day extension of time. We GRANT the motion and extend the time November 30, 2020 . We caution appellant that failure to file its brief by November 30th may result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution without further notice. See
T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 38.8( a)(1).

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

h1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

147545

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147545

COA: 315414

Kent CC: 12

- 007722

- FH

FEYSAL MOHAMED

- SAID ASSINK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         4,537
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         251
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    71,423
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         9,958
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           10,078
<LOANS>                                        113,532
<ALLOWANCE>                                    278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,906
<DEPOSITS>                                     106,905
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,655
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       39
<OTHER-SE>                                     44,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 207,906
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                8,436
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              5,018
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               751
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               14,205
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             7,078
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7,127
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             6,524
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                8,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,241
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2,475
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.38
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   58
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               278
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              278
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           278
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>