alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspire Japan,
Inc., for the quarter ending October 31, 2009, I, Ken Osako, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aspire Japan, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:
  1. Such
quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2009,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Aspire Japan, Inc.
  Dated:  December
      21, 2009
   Aspire
Japan, Inc.
  By:
              /s/
      Ken Osako
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Chief
      Financial
Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILFRED GARRARD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1301 

 )

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 27, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County, Chris Helinger, Judge.

Wilfred Garrard, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file an 

amended motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 

3.800(a) and to attach a certified copy of the transcript of appellant's plea and 

sentencing hearing that establishes the existence of an error in appellant's written 

judgment and sentence. See Nielson v. State, 984 So. 2d 587, 588-89 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2008); see also Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007). 

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 796 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that no American 

should be penalized for failing to purchase Government-mandated health 

coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 6, 2009 

Mr. SHADEGG submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

no American should be penalized for failing to purchase 

Government-mandated health coverage. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that no American should be imprisoned or 

3 fined for failing to purchase Government-mandated health 

4 coverage. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August 19, 2011 | /s/ Todd Hays           |   |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                              | Todd Hays               |   |
|                              | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                              |                    |   |
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51149,Inc., for the Quarter Ending October 31, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of 51149, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended October 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of 51149, Inc. 

 
| Dated: December 9, 2005 |
|-------------------------|

 

**51149, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 D0 29 1 . C. W AYNE FOUNTAI N v . SHARON KAY STANGE.

C. W ay ne Fo u n t ai n fi l ed t h i s ap pl i cat io n fro m t h e p ro b a t e c o u rt ’ s o rd er

d i s ch arg i n g Sh aro n St an g e as t h e ad m i n i s t rat or o f t h e es tat e o f A rt h ur Do n W at k i n s

. 1

Un d er OCGA § 1 5 -9 -1 2 3 (a), a p art y i n a ci v i l cas e i n p ro b at e c o u r t s h al l h av e t h e

ri g h t of ap peal t o an ap p el lat e co u rt wi th o ut fi rs t s eek i n g rev i ew i n s u peri o r co u rt

.

A pro b at e co u rt i s d efi n ed as “ a p ro b at e co u rt o f a c o u n t y h av i n g a p o p ul at i o n o f

m o re th an 9 0 ,0 0 0 p ers o ns acco rd i n g t o t h e Un i t ed St at es d ecen n i al cen su s o f 2 0 1 0

o r an y fu t u re s u ch cen s u s .” OCGA § 1 5 -9 -1 2 0 (2 ). Acco rd i n g t o t h e 2 0 1 0 cen s u s

,

Co l um b i a Co u n t y had a p o p u l at i o n o f 12 4 ,0 5 3. Becau s e t h e Pro bat e Co u rt o f

Co l um b i a Co u n t y m eet s t h e s t at u t o r y d e f i n i t io n o f a p ro b at e co u rt

, Fo un t ai n h as a

ri gh t o f di rect ap p eal to t h i s Co u rt

, an d no ap p l i cat io n was req u i red

. See O’Reg a n v.

Br en n a n , 2 0 4 G a. Ap p

. 5 0 (4 1 8 SE2 d 3 8 9 ) (1 9 9 2 ).

Acco rd i ng l y

, t h e ap p l i c a t i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal i s hereb y GRANTED

p u rs u an t t o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (j). Fo un t a i n s h a l l h av e t en d ay s fro m t he d at e o f t h i s

o rd er t o fi l e a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i n t h e p ro b at e co u rt

. OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (g ). Th e cl erk o f

t h e p ro b at e co u rt i s d i rect ed t o i n cl u d e a co p y o f t h i s ord er i n t h e reco rd t ran s m i t t ed

t o t he Co u rt o f Ap p eal s

.

1 Fo u n t ai n fi l ed th e ap p l icat i o n wi t h t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

, wh i ch t ran s ferred t h e

m at t er t o t h i s Co u rt . Cas e No . S2 2 D0 6 7 8 (Feb . 2 2

, 2 0 2 2 ). March 28, 2022C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/28/2022
Rule 211. Oral Arguments

[Any party or the party’s attorney shall have the right to argue any motion and the 

court shall have the right to require oral argument. With the approval of the court 

oral argument may be dispensed with by agreement of the attorneys and the 

matter submitted to the court either on the papers filed of record, or on such 

briefs as may be filed by the parties. The person seeking the order applied for 

shall argue first and may also argue in reply, but such reply shall be limited to 

answering arguments advanced by the respondent. In matters where there may 

be more than one respondent, the order of argument by the respondents shall be 

as directed by the court.] Any interested party may request oral argument on a 

motion. The court may require oral argument, whether or not requested by a

party. The court may dispose of any motion without oral argument.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13290]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Issuance of Permit for Incidental Take of Threatened Species

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 14, 1995, a notice was published in the Federal Register 
(60 FR 36305) that an application had been filed with the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service (Service) by Washington County, Utah, for a permit to 
incidentally take, pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered 
Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), 
threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in conjunction with 
otherwise legal activities including building construction, in portions 
of Washington County pursuant to the Implementation Agreement that 
implements the Washington County Habitat Conservation Plan.
    Notice is hereby given that on February 23, 1996, as authorized by 
the provisions of the Act, the Service issued an incidental take permit 
PRT-811471 to the above-named party subject to certain conditions set 
forth therein. The permit was granted only after it was determined that 
it was applied for in good faith, that by granting the permit it will 
not be to the disadvantage of the threatened species, and that it will 
be consistent with the purposes and policies set forth in the Act, as 
amended.
    Additional information on this permit action may be obtained by 
contacting the Assistant Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Utah Field Office, 145 East 1300 South Street, Suite 404, Salt 
Lake City, Utah 84115, telephone (801) 524-5001, between the hours of 
7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays.

    Dated: May 20, 1996.
Terry Terrell,
Deputy Regional Director Denver, Colorado, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service
[FR Doc. 96-13290 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit32.2

 

 

Inconnection withthisReport on Form10-Qforthe three and six monthsended March 31, 2017(the “Report”)ofPennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”),asfiled withthe SecuritiesandExchange Commissiononthe datehereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplieswiththe requirementsof Section13(a)or15(d)ofthe SecuritiesExchange Act of1934, as amended;and

 

(2)  The informationcontainedinthe Report fairlypresents, inall material respects, the financial conditionandresultsof operationsoftheRegistrant.

 

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| /s/ Aviv Efrat                             |
| Name: Aviv Efrat                           |
| Title:   Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:   May 8, 2017              |
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

 

 

I, Paul J. Kane, certify that: 

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

 

 (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 30, 2007

 

/s/ Paul J. Kane______________________

 

Paul J. Kane

Principal Accounting Officer

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
Exhibit
32.2(a)
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
  In
connection with the report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Holli C. Nichols, Executive
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:
  (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and
  (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
  Date:
      February 25, 2010
                By:
                /s/    HOLLI C. NICHOLSHolli
      C. Nichols
                  Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Case 3:18-cv-08010-SPL Document 29 Filed 04/17/19 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:18-cv-00148-DLR Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 21 of 21
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Cause number: 01-18-00639-CV

Style: Loruhamah Dickey v. Harris County, City of Houston, Houston 

Community College System, Houston Independent School District

Date motions filed*: September 6, 2018

Type of motions: Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Court Reporter Fees; Motion for 

Extension of Time to Pay Court Reporter, Clerk, and Appellate Filing 

Fees or to be Declared Exempt

Party filing motions: Pro Se Appellant Loruhamah Dickey

Document to be filed:

“Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal

Bond” or Payment of Reporter’s & Clerk’s Record & Filing Fees

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: 8/7/18 (Filing Fee) & 8/14/18 (Record Fees)

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Dates: 9/7/18 (Filing) 9/20/18 (Record)

Date Requested: N/A (maximum amount requested)

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted in part; if documents are to be filed, documents due: October 8, 2018.

☐ Denied

☐ Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant’s pro se motion for an extension of time to pay the appellate fees is granted

until October 8, 2018. Appellant is notified that, if he seeks to be declared indigent

for purposes of appellate costs, he must contact the Harris County District Clerk to 

file the Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond in

the district court, or a statement that includes the same information, by October 8, 2018.

See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (b); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: September 20, 2018
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-77060, 33-93048, 333-49561, 333-56349, 333-55827, and
333-46222) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-82089,
333-94641, 333-31982, and 333-46224) of our report dated February 1, 2001, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ATMI, Inc.
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000.

                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
March 29, 2001
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 8 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 8 Filed 01/18/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 8 Filed 01/18/18 Page 3 of 3
United States 

PLAINTIFF 

V. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

'RICT OF ARIZONA 

___ FILED ___ LODGED 

-7""....:.:,:RE~CE:::,:IVE:.:;:D~===~CO~PY 

W,ITNESS LIST 

MAY 1 J 2019 

Scott Daniel Warren 

PRESIDING JUDGE c O 11 in 5 couRTROOM DEPUTY Sherry Gammon COURT REPORTER Erica McQuillen 

HEARING/TRIAL DATE (s) May 13, 2019 PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY (s) Anna Wright, DEFENDANT ATTORNEY (s) Greg Kuykendall, 

Nathaniel Walters Amy Knight 

-

PLF DFT DATE SWORN DATE APPEARED WITNESSES Under 

Rule 

,/ sl 1.~I ,ei 5/ 1-3! 19 Dr. Robin Reineke 

/. 5 /I~\ Ill 5/,g) JCj Maryada Vallet 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 209 Filed 05/13/19 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William Uusiheimala
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                May
      17, 2010
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




TERMINATION

OF

IRREVOCABLE PROXY AND

VOTING AGREEMENT




     WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company granted an irrevocable proxy dated January 29, 1989 to J. Frank
Harrison, III to exercise its voting rights with respect to any and all Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated as may be owned by The Coca-Cola Company; and



     WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company, J. Frank Harrison, III, J. Frank Harrison, Jr. and Reid M.
Henson, in his capacity as co-trustee of three trusts for the benefit of certain relatives of the
Harrisons, entered into that certain Voting Agreement dated January 27, 1989; and



     WHEREAS, on December 22, 1997, The Coca-Cola Company transferred all of its shares in
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated to Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Investments, Inc.; and



     WHEREAS, in connection therewith, Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Investments, Inc. agreed to be
bound by and comply with the terms and conditions of such Voting Agreement; and



     WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company, Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Investments, Inc., J. Frank
Harrison, III and Reid M. Henson each desire to terminate such irrevocable proxy and such Voting
Agreement;



     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, (i) the irrevocable proxy granted by The Coca-Cola Company to J. Frank Harrison, III
and (ii) the Voting Agreement dated January 27, 1989, are hereby terminated in all respects
effective as of February 19, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	The Coca-Cola Company
	 	Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Investments, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Harry L. Anderson	 	By:	 	/s/ Harry L. Anderson
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Harry L. Anderson 	 	Name:	 	Harry L. Anderson 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Vice President and Controller	 	Title:	 	Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ J. Frank Harrison, III	 	/s/ Reid M. Henson
	 
	 	 
	J. Frank Harrison, III
	 	Reid M. Henson, Trustee