alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Roderick Bartlett, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TransAct Energy Corp. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 6, 2008  /s/ Roderick Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Avicena Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Belinda Tsao NivaggioliName: Belinda Tsao NivaggioliTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 21, 2007/s/ Michael SullivanName: Michael SullivanTitle: Acting Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 21, 2007


This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of PennantPark Investment
Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of PennantPark Investment Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:
August 5, 2008



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|                                  
|/s/ Aviv Efrat                    
|Aviv Efrat Chief Financial
Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Paul Allen Sorensen,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Karen Barcklay, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00674-PHX-JAT

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) from the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 61) recommending that this case be dismissed pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a). (Doc. 61 at 2). The Court notes that the internal docket 

reflects that a copy of the R&R was mailed to Dorothy McKaney and Leeland Sorenson

(as well as being electronically sent to the Defendants who have appeared) on August 20, 

2019. 

No one has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the 

R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not 

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en 

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge=s 

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis 

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Therefore,
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 61) is accepted. This 

case is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a) and the Clerk of the 

Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 

Dated this 10th day of September, 2019.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-4482

NICK LEE LOSEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.

Irene M. Keeley, District Judge.

(CR-98-33)

Submitted: February 24, 2000

Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Thomas G. Dyer, DYER LAW OFFICES, Clarksburg, West Virginia,

for Appellant. David E. Godwin, United States Attorney, Sam G.

Nazzaro, Assistant United States Attorney, Sharon L. Potter, Assistant

United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Nick Lee Losey appeals the 240-month sentence he received after

he pled guilty to interstate domestic violence, see 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 2261(a)(1) (West Supp. 1999), and possession of cocaine with

intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1994). He contends that

the district court clearly erred in determining the amount of cocaine

for which he was responsible. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 2D1.1 (1998); United States v. McDonald , 61 F.3d 248, 255 (4th

Cir. 1995) (providing standard of review). We affirm.

Following his arrest, Losey gave a statement to a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent in which he admitted that, for two

years, he bought two ounces of cocaine and a pound of marijuana per

week from his source. When Losey entered into a plea agreement, the

government agreed to stipulate that Losey was responsible for 500

grams to two kilograms of cocaine. However, the probation officer

relied on Losey's statement in calculating that he was responsible for

5.3 kilograms of cocaine. At the sentencing hearing, the DEA agent

testified that he regarded the stipulation as an accurate estimate of the

amount of cocaine Losey distributed. Nonetheless, the district court

decided that Losey's own statement was the best evidence, particularly in view of the fact that, to the degree it could be corroborated,

it appeared to be accurate. We are not able to say that the district

court clearly erred in making this determination.

We therefore affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

 2
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Russell Chaney, Principal Accounting Officer of
COPsync, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:





1.


the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and





2.


the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 19, 2008
            /s/Russell
      Chaney
              Russell
      Chaney
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the periodic report of JMP Group Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas B. Kilian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 4, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas B. Kilian   
|                       |  |  |  | Thomas B. Kilian       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



61
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1758

TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley 

County, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (5:09-cv-00046-gec) 

Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 9, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Jack v. Stubblefield, No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec 

(W.D. Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Henry Andrews, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: October 28, 2008  /s/ Henry Andrews Henry Andrews President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32





<PAGE>



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Springbank Resources,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending May 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  Clint R. Black,  the Chief
Executive  Officer and Philip F. Grey,  the Principal  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of her
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



July 13, 2007                          /s/ Clint R. Black
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Clint R. Black, President and Chief
                                       Executive Officer


July 13, 2007                          /s/ Philip F. Grey
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Philip F. Grey, Principal Financial
                                       Officer
exv10w51






Exhibit 10.51




FIRST AMENDMENT TO




TERMINATION PROTECTION AGREEMENT




     WHEREAS, a Termination Protection Agreement (the “Agreement”) was entered into between Stanley
P. Locke (“Executive”) and Thomas and Betts Corporation and its successors and assigns (the
“Company”) effective December 2, 2003;



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive mutually consented to the amendment and restatement of the
Agreement, effective January 1, 2005, to reflect the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the related final Treasury Department
regulations;



     WHEREAS, the Board approved the terms and provisions of such amended and restated Agreement at
its meeting on September 5, 2007; and



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend and restate the Agreement further, in order
to clarify certain of its provisions that are governed by, or are otherwise subject to, Section
409A of the Code;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:



     1. Section 1 is hereby amended to read as follows:



     Defined Terms.



     Unless otherwise indicated herein, capitalized terms used in this Agreement which are defined
in Schedule A shall have the meanings set forth in Schedule A.



     The Company and Executive both agree that the definition of “Change in Control” listed in
Schedule A shall be used for Executive in any and all plans, programs or agreements in which
Executive participates or to which Executive is a party in lieu of any similar definition used in
such plans, programs or agreements; provided, however, that the definition of
“Change in Control” listed in Schedule A shall not replace any such similar definition that serves
as a “permissible payment event” (within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(a)) under any such
plan, program or agreement.



     2. Schedule A is hereby amended to read as follows:



     Section (e) of the Definition of “Change in Control” is deleted.



     The Definition of “Payment Date” is hereby amended to read as follows:



     “Payment Date” means (i) the Delayed Payment Date, if (A) the payment is subject to
Section 409A of the Code, (B) the payment event for purposes of Section 409A of the Code is



 









 







Separation from Service, and (C) on the Termination Date stock of the Company (or any other
entity considered a single employer with the Company under Treas. Reg. §1.409A-1(g) or any
successor thereto) is publicly traded on an established securities market or otherwise, or (ii) in
any other case, the date that is ten (10) days after the Termination Date.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the ___day of
                                        , 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 

Name
	 	 
	 

	 	Title	 	 
	 
	 

	 	 

Stanley P. Locke
	 	 







- 2 -