alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ezra Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer of Del
Toro Silver Corp. (the Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended January 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                      

|Dated: March 17, 2011 | By:
      /s/ Ezra Jimenez       
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                      | Ezra Jimenez                     
|                      | Chief Financial Officer          
|                      | (Principal Accounting Officer and
|                      | Principal Financial Officer)     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Del Toro Silver
Corp. and will be retained by Del Toro Silver Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                          |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| /s/    Charif Souki                                                                                                                                                     |
| Charif SoukiChief Executive Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. |
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification****of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                David BergerDavid
                BergerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerNovember
                1, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13681]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of an 
Expiring Information Collection: SF 2823

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management will submit to the Office of Management and Budget 
a request for a clearance of an expiring information collection. SF 
2823, Designation of Beneficiary for Federal Employees Group Life 
Insurance, is used by any Federal employee or retiree covered by the 
Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program to instruct the Office 
of Federal Employees Group Life Insurance how to distribute the 
proceeds of his or her life insurance when the statutory order of 
precedence does not meet his or her needs.
    We estimate 1,000 SF 2823 forms are completed annually by 
annuitants. Each form takes approximately 15 minutes to complete for an 
annual estimated burden of 250 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-Mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#066c6b606774746968466b676f6a2869766b28616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7913141f180b0b1617391418101557160914571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 
1, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Kenneth H. Glass, Chief, Insurance Operations Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, 1900 E Street NW., Room 3415, Washington, DC 20415-
0001

and

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW., Room 10235, Washinton, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Team Leader, Management Services Division, (202) 
606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 96-13681 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 778-3700

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff,

vs.

G6 Hospitality Property, LLC,

Defendant.

No. 2:17-cv-04119-SPL

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Pursuant to Local Rule 40.2(d), Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum and Defendant G6

Hospitality Property, LLC, hereby notify the Court that the parties have resolved this

matter. The resolution disposes of the entire case, and the parties anticipate finalizing

their resolution and filing a joint stipulation to dismiss this case with prejudice within the

next 30 days.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court vacate all current

deadlines and court dates in this matter.

Caroline Larsen, SBN 022547

Douglas (Trey) Lynn, SBN 028054

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., #00504800

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone: (602) 778-3700

Caroline.Larsen@ogletreedeakins.com

Trey.Lynn@ogletreedeakins.com

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:17-cv-04119-SPL Document 13 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 3
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 778-3700

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED this 6th day of December 2017.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

By s/Caroline Larsen

Caroline Larsen

Douglas (Trey) Lynn

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Attorneys for Defendant

STROJNIK P.C.

By s/Peter Strojnik

Peter Strojnik

2375 East Camelback Road Suite 600

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

ADA@strojnik.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:17-cv-04119-SPL Document 13 Filed 12/06/17 Page 2 of 3
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 778-3700

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 6th day of December 2017, I electronically transmitted

the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF Systems for filing and

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrant:

Peter Strojnik, State Bar No. 6464

STROJNIK P.C.

2375 East Camelback Road Suite 600

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

ADA@strojnik.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

s/Kathleen M. Hubert

Case 2:17-cv-04119-SPL Document 13 Filed 12/06/17 Page 3 of 3
Court ofAppeals for the First District ofTexas at Houston Order Appellate case name: In re Ronald Glenn Hightower Appellate case number: 01-14-00473-CV Date motion filed: September 18, 2014 

### Party filing motion: Relator It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied. 

### Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higiey Acting for the Court 

### Panel consists of: Justices Higiey, Bland, and Sharp Date: December 16, 2014f«^ Court of;Appeals, First District 301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002-2066 

# OFFieiAbSlJSiNESS plipSi PEN^T* fOR PRIVATE USE



### CASE NO. 01-14-00473^/ RONALD GLENN; H1GHTQWER #1695949 NI.-XI-E 7'7/3' S^G 1 M U.S.POSTAGE» PITNEY BOWES 

# %ZP5J002 $000.48° TM Q-00I372104DEC 17 2014

iS;8"-3L,/:0'2'/i-5' RE'TU'-RiM' TO,. SENDER NOT P'E',Li'VE,RABL-£ _A5 . ADDRE:S;S'€.D "tJvl^-AJB.L C-] •••! O FO^.WA-R-D S'C: -77 682 2 86 699 * 2 5B 3 -,1Z'3'&3:--17;- 47 

## i Li •]VlHiib11l r-1'11*vii i,' > ^m pi1- i i•

15i -11 il • i^ly^li^ Mi
OFFICC OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXA!S AUSTIN

HonorableAlex Jung county **1Sttomey** Olllesple 

# county ifreder:cksburg, Texas
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Square Foot Gardening Foundation Incorporated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Western Organics Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00467-PHX-GMS

ORDER/NOTICE PURSUANT TO 

FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) 

 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Civil Procedure 

apply to all proceedings in this case. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, you must serve each Defendant in your case with the Summons and 

Complaint within 90 days from the date the Complaint is filed, unless you obtain a 

waiver of service pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). If, for good 

reason, you cannot serve your Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days, 

you may, prior to the expiration of the 90-day period, file with the Court a request for an 

extension of time in which to serve your Summons and Complaint. In that request, you 

should set forth the reason why you have not accomplished service and request a specific 

short period of time in which to accomplish such service on any Defendant. If the Court 

believes your reason constitutes “good cause” it will authorize a brief additional period in 

which you can then serve the Defendant. 

 If you do not obtain an extension and any Defendant named in your Complaint is 

not served within 90 days, the Court is obliged, after notice to you, to dismiss the 

Case 2:18-cv-00467-GMS Document 9 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Complaint without prejudice (meaning that your Complaint is dismissed but you may 

refile the Complaint in a new action if you wish to do so). 

The way that the Court knows that you have served the Defendant is that, the 

person who serves the Defendant with the Summons and Complaint is required, 

according to the rules, to file an affidavit with the Court which proves that the Defendant 

was served in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). Therefore, you need to be sure that, 

prior to 90 days from the date on which you filed your Complaint, whoever serves the 

Summons and Complaint on each Defendant files an affidavit with this Court 

demonstrating that they accomplished proper service. 

THIS CONSTITUTES YOUR NOTICE UNDER RULE 4(m) THAT 

IF YOU HAVE NOT APPROPRIATELY SERVED ANY 

DEFENDANT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM THE FILING OF YOUR 

COMPLAINT THAT DEFENDANT WILL BE DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FROM YOUR LAWSUIT. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all

Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the 

time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on May 11, 2018. 

 Dated this 13th day of February, 2018. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:18-cv-00467-GMS Document 9 Filed 02/13/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Joe F Dickson, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the

amended

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:

November 17, 2010   /s/ Joe F. Dickson Joe F. Dickson Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31. 1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Richard K. Williams, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K ofAdvanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC rules] 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 8, 2006
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NYMEX Holdings,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James E. Newsome, Principal Executive Officer of the Company and
Kenneth D. Shifrin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    JAMES E. NEWSOMEName:

James E. NewsomeTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date: February 29, 2008




By:

/s/    KENNETH D.
SHIFRINName:

Kenneth D. ShifrinTitle:

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date: February 29, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ELIAZAR BARRAZA, a.k.a. Eliazar 

Molina Barraza, a.k.a. Elizor Molina 

Barraza, a.k.a. Eliazar Barraza-Molina, a.k.a. 

Eliazar Barraza Molina, a.k.a. Iliazar 

Barraza Molina, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-50489 

D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00084-SVW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Eliazar Barraza appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his 

guilty-plea conviction and 72-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-50489 

the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Barraza first contends that the district court should have granted his motion 

to dismiss the indictment because California Health & Safety Code sections 11351 

and 11377(a)—the statutes under which Barraza was convicted in 2008, leading to 

his initial removal from the United States—are not divisible. Our recent decisions 

in United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc), and 

United States v. Murillo-Alvarado, 876 F.3d 1022 (9th Cir. 2017), foreclose 

Barraza’s contention that section 11351 is indivisible. Barraza does not contend 

that his removal order was invalid even if section 11351 is divisible, see 8 U.S.C. 

§§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), (a)(2)(B)(i); therefore, we need not reach his remaining 

contentions regarding the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the 

indictment.

Barraza next contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The 

below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including 

Barraza’s recent and extensive criminal history. See United States v. ValenciaBarragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2010). 

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 

(9th Cir. 2000), we remand to the district court with the instruction that it delete 
3 14-50489 

from the judgment the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). 

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roderick Bartlett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Roderick Bartlett Roderick Bartlett Chief Executive Officer Date: October 29,  2007