alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30921-30922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15430]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OJP (NIJ) No. 1085]
RIN 1121-ZA37


National Institute of Justice Solicitation for Proposals to 
Evaluate and Research Sentencing Reforms and Their Effects on 
Corrections

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 
National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Announcement of the availability of the National Institute of 
Justice Solicitation for proposals to evaluate and research sentencing 
reforms and their effects on corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: The deadline for receipt of proposals is close of business on 
July 30, 1996.

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tawana Waugh, U.S. Department of 
Justice Response Center, at 800-421-

[[Page 30922]]

6770 (in Metropolitan Washington, DC, 202-307-1480).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following supplementary information is 
provided:

    Authority: This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime 
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, sections 201-203, as amended, 
42 U.S.C. 3721-3723 (1988).

Background

    As part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 
1994 (the Crime Act), most State and local correctional systems will 
receive Federal funds in fiscal year 1996 to expand capacity to 
incarcerate violent offenders with more certainty and to impose longer 
and more determinate sentences. The Act directs that a portion of 
appropriated funds be set aside for research and evaluation, including 
an assessment of the effect on public safety and other effects of the 
expansion of correctional capacity and sentencing reforms. The National 
Institute of Justice will award up to $4 million for research and 
evaluation efforts.
    Interested organizations should call the National Criminal Justice 
Reference Service (NCJRS) at 1-800-851-3420 to obtain a copy of 
``Solicitation for Proposals to Evaluate and Research Sentencing 
Reforms and Their Effects on Corrections'' (refer to document No. 
SL000141). The solicitation is available electronically via the NCJRS 
Bulletin Board, which can be accessed via Internet. Telnet to 
ncjrsbbs.aspensys.com, or gopher to ncjrs.aspensys.com 71. For World 
Wide Web access, connect to the Justice Information Center at <a href="http://
www.ncjrs.org">http://
www.ncjrs.org</a>. Those without Internet access can dial the NCJRS 
Bulletin Board via modem: dial 301-738-8895. Set modem at 9600 baud, 8-
N-1.
Jeremy Travis,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 96-15430 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE GOMEZ,

Appellant,

v.

ALLIED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, JUDY 

MICHELE RILEY a/k/a JUDY MICHELE CRENSHAW, a/k/a JUDY 

MICHELE SIMMONS and MARKWONDA LARSHAY CRENSHAW, as

Personal Representative of the Estate of MARCASIA LASHAY 

CRENSHAW ,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-1283

[May 5, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Paige Hardy Gillman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502019CA011811.

Jose G. Rodriguez of Jose G. Rodriguez, P.A., West Palm Beach, Diego 

C. Asencio of Diego C. Asencio, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens and Philip M. 

Burlington and Nichole J. Segal of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West 

Palm Beach, for appellant.

Sarah Lahlou-Amine of Banker Lopez Gasser, P.A., Tampa, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### William BRUCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 57125.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 10, 1990.

Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Bruce, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Appellant was convicted by a jury on February 25, 1982, of one count each of kidnapping and forcible rape. Appellant was sentenced by the court to a term of 30 years imprisonment for kidnapping and a consecutive term of 50 years for rape, as a persistent sexual offender.

Appellant filed a timely Rule 29.15 pro se motion on March 31, 1988, which was not amended by counsel. The motion court denied appellant relief without a hearing on June 19, 1989. We have reviewed appellant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the entirety of the record upon which they are based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find these findings to be clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j); *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 697 (Mo. banc 1989). We also find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and, therefore, we affirm the motion court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, which sets forth the basis of our decision.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PACIFIC GOLDRIM RESOURCES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Jason Schlombs, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

JASON SCHLOMBSJason SchlombsChief Executive and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 7th2007
















































---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 17, 2018

No. 04-18-00091-CR

Brandon Edward COLEMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9600

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

ORDER

By order dated June 15, 2018, this court granted prior appointed appellate counsel’s 

motion to withdraw and abated these appeals to the trial court for the appointment of new 

counsel. By order dated July 10, 2018, this court noted supplemental clerk’s records were filed 

containing the trial court’s order appointing new appellate counsel. The order reinstated the 

appeals on the docket of the court and ordered appellant’s brief to be filed no later than August 9, 

2018.

On August 14, 2018, appellant’s new appointed appellate counsel, Mr. Michael S. Raign, 

filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief which was granted, extending the deadline 

for filing the brief to September 10, 2018. 

On September 14, 2018, this court notified Mr. Raign that the brief was late and ordered 

him to file a written response stating a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief. 

In response to this order, Mr. Raign filed a motion on September 24, 2018, requesting an

additional extension of time to file the brief until October 10, 2018, for a total extension of sixty 

days. By order dated September 25, 2018, this court granted the motion. This court’s order 

stated, “THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL 

BE GRANTED. The Appellant’s brief must be filed by October 10, 2018.”

Appellant’s brief has not been filed. Ms. Raign is ORDERED to file the brief in this 

court no later than October 29, 2018. If Mr. Raign fails to file the brief by that date, these
appeals will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be 

asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32





DUSSAULT APPAREL INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dussault Apparel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason Dussault, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 18, 2011
By:
/s/Jason DussaultName:
Jason DussaultTitle:
Principal Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended October 7, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven R. Berrard, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ STEVEN R. BERRARDSteven R. BerrardInterim Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: November 17, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30023-30024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14964]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[IN61-1-7230b; FRL-5509-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) revision request submitted by the State of Indiana on September 
19, 1995, and November 8, 1995, which establishes regulations for 
suppliers and users of automobile/mobile equipment refinishing coatings 
in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties. In the final rules section 
of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving this action as a direct 
final rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a 
noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed 
rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no 
adverse comments are received in response to that direct final rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If 
EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn 
and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent 
final rule based on the proposed rule. Any parties interested in

[[Page 30024]]

commenting on this document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before 
July 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18-J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the State submittal are available for inspection at: 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18-J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Palermo, Regulation 
Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: May 13, 1996.
Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-14964 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mark LYTLE, Appellant.

No. WD 52131.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 7, 1997.

David Simpson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Assistant Attorney General, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, C.J., and HANNA and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Lytle appeals his conviction following a jury trial for child molestation in the first degree, § 566.067, RSMo 1994, and sentence as a prior offender, § 558.016, RSMo 1994, to seven years imprisonment.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 825 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 825

   Recognizing the P-3 Orion naval aircraft for 50 years of service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 2009

Mr. Olson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the P-3 Orion naval aircraft for 50 years of service.

Whereas the P-3 Orion, a four-engine turboprop anti-submarine and maritime 
        surveillance aircraft, has been on the front line of the Navy's land-
        based maritime patrol since its first flight on November 25, 1959;
Whereas the P-3 Orion was originally designed as a land-based, long-range, anti-
        submarine warfare patrol aircraft;
Whereas the most capable version of the Orion, the P-3C, was first delivered to 
        the Navy in 1969;
Whereas the P-3 Orion's mission has evolved in the 21st century to include 
        surveillance of the battle space, both at sea and over land;
Whereas the long-range capabilities of the P-3 Orion have provided instant, 
        valuable information to ground troops in Operation Iraqi Freedom and the 
        war on terror;
Whereas the Navy continues to implement major improvements and modernizations to 
        the P-3 Orion to satisfy Navy and joint requirements through the early 
        part of the 21st century; and
Whereas many countries fly the P-3 Orion--including Canada, Australia, Germany, 
        and Spain--making it one of the most established Navy aircraft available 
        to America's allies: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the P-3 
Orion, its pilots, and its manufacturers for 50 years of invaluable 
service to the Armed Forces and the United States.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**  I, John A. Schissel, certify that:6) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 ofColumbia Equity Trust, Inc.; 7) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 8) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 9) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III.E.];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and10) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalentfunctions): c) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  d) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         Date: August 15, 2005            /s/ John A. Schissel         John A. Schissel         Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended M arch 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Zahir Teja, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Zahir TejaZahir TejaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
AMENDMENTS TO
 2006 EMPLOYEE, DIRECTOR AND CONSULTANT STOCK PLAN
 
 Section 3(a) of the Plan is amended to revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
 
 (a)   The number of Shares which may be issued from time to time pursuant to this Plan shall be 6,000,000, or the equivalent of such number of Shares after the Administrator, in its sole discretion, has interpreted the effect of any stock split, stock dividend, combination, recapitalization or similar transaction in accordance with Paragraph 24 of the Plan.  [Adopted December 6, 2010]
 
 Section 4.2(e) of the Plan is amended to add an new clause (ii), such that the Section, as amended, reads as set forth below:
 
 (e)   Make changes to any outstanding Stock Right, including, without limitation, to reduce or increase the exercise price or purchase price, accelerate the vesting schedule or extend the expiration date, provided that (i) no such change shall impair the rights of a Participant under any grant previously made without such Participant’s consent and (ii) except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, distribution (whether in the form of cash, Common Stock, other securities or other property), stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, change in control, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Common Stock or other securities, or similar transaction(s)), the Company may not, without obtaining stockholder approval: (a) amend the terms of outstanding Stock Rights to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding Stock Rights; (b) cancel outstanding Stock Rights in exchange for Stock Rights with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Stock Rights; or (c) cancel outstanding Stock Rights with an exercise price above the current stock price in exchange for cash or other securities; [Adopted November 23, 2010]
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-32022) pertaining to the YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan and Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-95201) of
YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report
dated September 1, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB)
for the year ended June 30, 2000.


                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
September 26, 2000