alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30565 Summary Calendar

LARRY TRIGGS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-2430-K May 23, 2000 Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Triggs, Louisiana inmate #66331, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Triggs contends that the district court erred in determining that his state application for post-conviction relief was not “properly filed” as that term is used in § 2244(d)(2). This Court’s opinion in Smith v. Ward , ___ F.3d ___, 2000 WL2

358294 at *2-3 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2000), indicates that Triggs’ state application for post-conviction relief was “properly filed” for purposes of § 2244(d) a nd should have tolled the § 2244(d) limitations period. Accordingly, the judgment dismissing Triggs’
§ 2254 application as time-barred is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion. VACATED and REMANDED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 880 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 880

Recognizing the efforts of career and technical colleges to educate and 
         train workers for positions in high-demand industries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Cassidy submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the efforts of career and technical colleges to educate and 
         train workers for positions in high-demand industries.

Whereas the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated that 15,600,000 new jobs will 
        be added to the labor force between 2006 and 2016, with population 
        shifts and new technologies fueling job growth;
Whereas more than 80 percent of respondents in the 2005 National Association of 
        Manufacturers Skills Gap report indicated that they are experiencing a 
        shortage of qualified workers;
Whereas career and technical colleges provide the real-world situations 
        necessary to engage students and prepare them for the workforce;
Whereas career and technical colleges provide an environment where students can 
        apply fundamental academic skills and employability skills to complex 
        job-related problems;
Whereas career and technical colleges' connections with local business leaders 
        allow the use of workforce readiness credentials to spread from the 
        ground up in a way that is mutually beneficial to students and 
        employers;
Whereas 14 percent of all employers reported being a member of a career and 
        technical education advisory committee in a Census Bureau Survey; and
Whereas employers assist career and technical colleges in developing programs 
        that reflect the needs of industry: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the efforts of career and technical colleges 
        to educate and train workers for positions in high-demand 
        industries; and
            (2) supports the connection career and technical colleges 
        provide between employers and students.
                                 <all>
```
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 22, 2012

Mr. Joseph L. Hood Jr.

Windle Hood Alley Norton Brittain & Jay LLP

Chase Tower, Suite 1350

201 East Main Drive

El Paso, TX 79901

Mr. John P. Mobbs

Attorney at Law

7170 Westwind Drive, Suite 201

El Paso, TX 79912

RE:Case Number:  10-0490

Court of Appeals Number:  08-07-00257-CV

Trial Court Number:  2003-4899

Style:EL APPLE I, LTD.

v.

MYRIAM OLIVAS

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 10-0490Page 1**
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15167]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Washington, D.C. 20268-0001

NAME OF AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. on July 9, 1996.

PLACE: Conference Room, 1333 H Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 
20268.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Issues in Docket No. MC96-2, Mail 
Classification Schedule, 1996--Classification Reform II (Nonprofit 
Mail).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Margaret P. Crenshaw, Secretary, 
Postal Rate Commission, Suite 300, 1333 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20268-0001, Telephone (202) 789-6840.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15167 Filed 6-11-96; 12:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14270]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Cargo Liability of Motor Carriers

AGENCY: Military Traffic Management Command (MTMC).

ACTION: Request for Carrier Industry Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice supplements the notice published on March 14, 1996 
(FR, Vol. 61, No. 51, page number 10566). The effective date of July 1, 
1996 is postponed to allow consideration of comments on the proposed 
motor carrier liability for shipments of non-Guaranteed Traffic (GT) 
Freight All Kinds (FAK) shipments, described in the MTMC Freight 
Traffic Rules Publication No. 1A, Items 112, 113, 115, and 116.

DATES: Comments concerning the proposed motor carrier liability for 
shipments of non-GTFAK must reach Headquarters, Military Traffic 
Management Command, ATTN: MTOP-T-SR, 629 NASSIF Building, 5611 Columbia 
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-5050, by August 5, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Julian Jolkovsky, MTOP-T-SR, (703) 681-3440, or Mr. James Murphy, 
MTOP-T-S, (703) 681-3443.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed liability, described on 61 FR 
10566, is the same liability already in effect for GT shipments, in 
MTMC Guaranteed Traffic Rules Publication No. 50, Item 350.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-14270 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
|    |                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
|                                                     |
| /s/ CHARIF SOUKI                                         |
| Charif Souki                                             |
| Chief Executive Officer of                               |
| Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of |
| Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.                           |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn
|Name:              |  | Arthur H. Penn         
|Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:              |  | February 4, 2015
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company Limited (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Liu Shao Yong, Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 29, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ Liu Shao YongName: Liu Shao YongTitle: Chairman of the Board of Directors
  *
    
    This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-30583

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAZDA RASASY, also known as Phatsavong Rasasy, also known as Phuts,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:14-CR-103

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mazda Rasasy has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Rasasy has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Rasasy’s claims of ineffective 

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 1, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-30583 Document: 00513448721 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2016
No. 15-30583

2

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Rasasy’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-30583 Document: 00513448721 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/01/2016
Exhibit 23.01

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (333-63871, 333-46916 and 333-117735), as amended, and in
the I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc. 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, of our
reports dated February 23, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial
statements, and schedule, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                                BDO Seidman, LLP

Bethesda, Maryland
March 30, 2005

                                      F-23
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

American Muslims for Palestine, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Arizona State University, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00670-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 This matter having recently come before this Court, 

 IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and 

motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would 

be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. Therefore, the 

parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of a motion to dismiss or motion to strike 

to determine whether it can be avoided. Consequently, motions to dismiss and motions to 

strike must be accompanied by a notice of certification of conferral, indicating that the 

parties have conferred to determine whether an amendment could cure a deficient 

pleading, and have been unable to agree that the pleading is curable by a permissible 

amendment. In addition, parties shall endeavor not to oppose motions to amend that are 

filed prior to the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference or within the time set for the Rule 16 

Case Management Order. Motions to dismiss and motions to strike that do not contain the 

required certification are subject to striking on the Court's own motion. 

Case 2:18-cv-00670-JJT Document 7 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on 

Defendants. 

 Dated this 2nd day of March, 2018. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00670-JJT Document 7 Filed 03/02/18 Page 2 of 2
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00303-CR 

DONALD RAY MCCRAY, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 251st District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 70,652-C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding 

 

September 27, 2019 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant Donald Ray McCray, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a 

purported judgment.1 However, no pronouncement of sentence or appealable order has 

been entered by the trial court. Questioning whether we have jurisdiction over the appeal,

we directed appellant to address the matter by September 9, 2019. Appellant did not file 

a response.

1 Appellant has previously filed seven notices of appeal in this criminal case, cause numbers 07-

16-00020-CR, 07-16-00444-CR, 07-17-00058-CR, 07-17-00258-CR, 07-18-00011-CR, 07-18-00257-CR,

and 07-19-00167-CR. We dismissed those appeals for want of jurisdiction.
2

As we stated in Kerr v. State, No. 07-13-00128-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12850,

at *9 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Nov. 25, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication), “[w]hen no sentence is pronounced, there is no valid judgment or conviction 

from which to appeal.” Given the absence of either an oral pronouncement of sentence 

or an appealable order, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, we dismiss 

the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
**ARTICLES OF EXCHANGE**

American Distribution & Packaging, Inc.  (a Nevada corporation)

exchanging its common stock for common stock  of, and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of,

AMERICAN WATER STAR, INC.  (a Nevada corporation)

 American Water Star, Inc. and American Distribution & Packaging, Inc.,  corporations organized and existing under and by virtue of the State of Nevada  Revised Statutes (the "NRS"), do hereby certify, pursuant to Chapter  92A thereof, that:

> 
 FIRST: The names and states of incorporation of the constituent corporations    in the Exchange (as defined below) are American Water Star, Inc. ("AWS"    or the "Parent Corporation"), a Nevada corporation, and American    Distribution & Packaging, Inc. ("AD&P" and together with    AWS, the "Constituent Corporations"), a Nevada corporation.

 SECOND: The Acquisition Agreement dated December 23, 2002 by and between    the Constituent Corporations providing for the exchange of all of the issued    and outstanding common stock of AD&P for 5,200,000 newly issued shares    of common stock of AWS (the "Exchange"). Accordingly, each outstanding    share of common stock of AD&P is being surrendered in exchange of approximately    5.2 shares of fully paid and non-assessable common stock of AWS. The Exchange    has been adopted, approved, certified, executed and acknowledged by AWS and    AD&P in accordance with the requirements of NRS 78.320.

 THIRD: AD&P, after the Exchange has been completed, will become a wholly    owned subsidiary of AWS.

 FOURTH: Immediately prior to the Exchange, the total issued and outstanding    voting common stock of AD&P was 1,000,000 shares. By a unanimous vote    of the shareholders (all 1,000,000 shares voting in favor of the Exchange),    the Exchange was approved by AD&P, the acquired entity. The Board of Directors    of AWS unanimously approved the Exchange. Shareholder approval was not required    by AWS, the acquiring entity, pursuant to NRS 92A.120(1).

 FIFTH: A copy of the Acquisition Agreement is on file at the principal place    of business of AWS, 4560 S. Decatur Blvd, Suite 204, Las Vegas, Nevada 89103,    on request and without cost, to any stockholder of either of the Constituent    Corporations.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned corporations have caused these Articles  of Exchange to be executed by their duly authorized officers on this 23rd day  of December, 2002.

 

| AMERICAN WATER STAR, INC.    | AMERICAN DISTRIBUTION & PACKAGING, INC. |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| By:/s/                       | By:/s/                                      |
| Roger Mohlman, President     | Thomas F. Krucker, President                |
|                         |                                        |
| By:/s/                       | By:/s/                                      |
| Thomas F. Krucker, Secretary | Mark Millsap, Secretary                     |
EX-10.34








Aflac
Incorporated 2008 Form 10-K





 EXHIBIT 10.34



AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN KRISS CLONINGER, III AND

AFLAC INCORPORATED




     THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 31st day of October, 2008,
by and between Aflac Incorporated, a Georgia corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”)
and Kriss Cloninger, III (hereinafter referred to as “Employee”).



W I T N
E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, Corporation and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated February 14,
1992, that was subsequently amended several times by the parties (as so amended, the “Employment
Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the parties executed a previous amendment dated November 12, 1993 which contained a
scrivener’s error that did not accurately memorialize the true intent of the parties; and



     WHEREAS, Corporation and Employee desire to modify the Employment Agreement, to accurately
state the true intent of the parties;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth and contained
herein, Corporation and Employee agree that the Employment Agreement shall be modified as follows:



     1. Paragraph 1 of the November 12, 1993 Amendment to Employment Agreement is struck in its
entirety and Paragraph 4 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended by deleting the second
sentence thereof and replacing it with the following:




“On an annual basis beginning effective March 16, 1993, the scheduled
term of this Agreement shall be extended for successive one (1) year
periods unless written notice of termination is given prior to such
annual date by one party to the other party that the Agreement will not
be extended by its terms.”



     2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms and continue to bind the parties.



     3. This Amendment shall be effective as the date set forth above.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Corporation has hereunto caused its duly authorized executive to execute
this Amendment on behalf of Corporation, and Employee has hereunto set his hand and seal, all being
done in duplicate originals, with one original being delivered to each party, as of the
3rd day of November, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Employee

	 	 	 	Aflac Incorporated	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Kriss Cloninger III
 

Kriss Cloninger, III

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Daniel P. Amos
 

Daniel P. Amos
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Thomas L. McDaniel

	 	Attest:
	 	/s/ Joey M. Loudermilk	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Witness

	 	 	 	Joey M. Loudermilk	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Corporate Secretary