alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Robert Francis Krebs, 

 Defendant. 

CR18-00263-TUC-JGZ(JR) 

PRELIMINARY ORDER 

(Pursuant to: 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a)) 

(Defendant in Custody) 

 

 Defendant has been evaluated by local professionals, Marisa Menchola, Ph.D.as 

well as Bradley Johnson, M.D. He has also been evaluated at FMC Butner, North Carolina 

by Robert Cochrane, Psy.D. 

In her report dated July 12, 2018, Dr. Menchola concluded that the Defendant was 

not competent to stand trial due to a major neurocognitive disorder (dementia). She further 

opined that the Defendant was not restorable to competence. 

In Dr. Johnson’s report dated September 3, 2018, he concluded that the Defendant 

was competent to stand trial and that the Defendant’s presentation was more likely 

consistent with malingering. 

In Dr. Cochrane’s report dated March 11, 2019, he concluded that there was no 

convincing evidence that the Defendant suffers from a mental disorder that would render 

him mentally incompetent. He also found that the Defendant was malingering and noted 

that his personal and criminal history was more consistent with a finding of antisocial 

personality disorder. 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 50 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A hearing was conducted on March 21, 2019. Defendant was not present. The 

Government agreed with the findings of Dr. Cochrane but Defense Counsel did not. 

In order to facilitate the transfer of the Defendant back to the District of Arizona, 

the Court preliminarily found that the Defendant was competent to proceed and should be 

transported back to Tucson, Arizona. A further hearing will be scheduled with the 

Defendant present. Dr. Cochrane may appear via videoconference. At the conclusion of 

the hearing, the Court will determine whether a final order of competency should be entered 

and whether the case should be set for trial. 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Status Conference is scheduled for Tuesday, 

May 7, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (mountain standard time) before this Court; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Cochrane may appear via video conference; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event the above date is not acceptable to 

Dr. Cochrane, he may contact the Court (at 520-205-4640) and reschedule. 

Dated this 22nd day of March, 2019. 

 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 50 Filed 03/25/19 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mtniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~eaI~

for tbe jfeberaI qcircuit

EDWIN COLON-RIVERA,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

2012-7110

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims in case no. 10-3060, Judge Alan G.

Lance, Sr.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Edwin Colon-Rivera moves for a 60-day extension of

time, until January 4, 2013, to file his reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

Case: 12-7110 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 11/07/2012
EDWIN COLON-RIVERA V. SHINSEKI

The motion is granted.

s21

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 12-7110 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 11/07/2012
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 878 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 878

Expressing support for the goals and ideals of National Family Literacy 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Platts submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the goals and ideals of National Family Literacy 
                                  Day.

Whereas National Family Literacy Day is held on November 1;
Whereas children spend 5 times as much time outside the classroom as they do in 
        school, and a parent's education and income are 2 of the biggest factors 
        in determining a child's success in school;
Whereas children who participate in family literacy programs demonstrate 
        significant gains in oral language skills and score higher on 
        standardized tests;
Whereas National Family Literacy Day encourages parents to become involved in 
        their children's education and schoolwork;
Whereas approximately 8,000 literacy programs and schools will hold readings, 
        workshops, book drives, and family activities at libraries and community 
        centers across the country in honor of National Family Literacy Day; and
Whereas National Family Literacy Day highlights multigenerational learning, the 
        importance of literacy for children and adults, and parental involvement 
        in the education of their children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Family 
        Literacy Day; and
            (2) recognizes the benefits of parental involvement in a 
        child's education.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 672 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 21, 2009. 

Whereas the Internet is a tool to exercise freedom of expression and association, both of which are basic human 

rights; 

Whereas the Internet is a medium to share information freely, promote social and economic development, and connect Vietnamese citizens domestically and internationally; 

Whereas the Government of Vietnam created the Administration Agency for Radio, Television and Electronics Information in October 2008 and issued Circular 07 in December 2008 to restrict Internet freedom, censor private 

blogs, and compel information technology companies to 

cooperate with government efforts to monitor personal information of Internet users; 

Whereas the Government of Vietnam has imprisoned bloggers 

and numerous democracy activists who have distributed 

their peaceful views over the Internet; 

Whereas the Government of Vietnam continues to firewall external websites promoting democracy and human rights; 

and 

Whereas these actions violate individuals’ right to freedom of 

speech and expression: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
2 

•HRES 672 EH 

(1) supports the right of Vietnamese citizens to access websites of their choosing and to have the freedom 

to share and publish information over the Internet; 

(2) calls on the Government of Vietnam to repeal 

Circular 07, Article 88, and similar statutes that restrict 

the Internet, so as to be in line with the International 

Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a signatory; 

(3) calls on the Government of Vietnam to become 

a responsible member state of the international community by respecting individuals’ freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom of political association; and 

(4) calls on the Government of Vietnam to release 

all political prisoners, including but not limited to the 

following bloggers and cyber activists— 

(A) Le Cong Dinh; 

(B) Le Nguyen Sang; 

(C) Le Thi Cong Nhan; 

(D) Nguyen Van Hai (Dieu Cay); 

(E) Nguyen Xuan Nghia; 

(F) Ngo Quynh; 

(G) Nguyen Ngoc Quang; 

(H) Nguyen Thi Hong; 

(I) Nguyen Van Dai; 

(J) Pham Ba Hai; 
3 

•HRES 672 EH 

(K) Pham Thanh Nghien; 

(L) Pham Van Troi; 

(M) Tran Huynh Duy Thuc; 

(N) Truong Minh Duc; 

(O) Truong Quoc Huy; 

(P) Vu Hoang Hai; 

(Q) Nguyen Tien Trung; and 

(R) Vu Hung. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6876

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAY ALLEN DICKS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cr-00015-LO-2; 1:16-cv-00628-LO)

Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ray Allen Dicks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Patricia T. Giles, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ray Allen Dicks, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dicks has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0415 IN THE MATTER OF: P.P., A Youth in Need of Care. **ORDER** Upon consideration of the Department’s Unopposed Motion to Supple me nt the Record on Appeal, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the record on appeal shall be supple me nted with State v. Proctor , First Jud ic ia l District Court Cause No. CDC 2022 - 30, that has already been filed with the Court in State v. Proctor , DA 23 - 0409.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2023

12/15/2023
H. Res. 87 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 27, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 181) 

to amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the 

Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and to modify the operation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 

1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, to clarify that a 

discriminatory compensation decision or other practice that is 

unlawful under such Acts occurs each time compensation is 

paid pursuant to the discriminatory compensation decision or 

other practice, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against the bill are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair 
2 

•HRES 87 EH 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and Labor; and (2) one motion to commit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00176-CR

No. 10-23-00181-CR

JAMES GAMBRELL, JR.

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 30096 & 30238

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 4, 2024, we issued an opinion and judgments in these causes of action 

affirming the trial court's judgment in trial court cause numbers 30096 and 30238. On the 

Court's own motion, we withdraw our opinion and judgments of January 4, 2024, and we 

substitute this opinion and accompanying judgments in their stead.
Gambrell v. State Page 2

A court has jurisdiction to determine whether it has jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 

S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The right to appeal in criminal cases is conferred 

by statute, and a party may appeal only from a judgment of conviction or an interlocutory 

order as authorized by statute. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2); Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). When this Court 

lacks jurisdiction, we have no power to act, and we must dismiss the attempted appeal. 

See State v. Dunbar, 297 S.W.3d 777, 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009).

Upon further review of the record, we dismiss these appeals for lack of 

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Appeals dismissed

Opinion issued and filed March 4, 2024

Do not publish

[CR25]
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14334]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


Commission of Fine Arts; Notice of Meeting

    The Commission of Fine Arts' next meeting is scheduled for 25 July 
1996 at 10:00 a.m. in the Commission's offices in the Pension Building, 
Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001 
to discuss various projects affecting the appearance of Washington, 
D.C., including building, memorials, parks, etc.; also matters of 
design referred by other agencies of the government.
    Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or 
oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, 
Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call the above number.

    Dated in Washington, D.C. 29 May 1996.

Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14334 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
EXHIBIT G 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-8 Filed 02/15/19 Page 20 of 20
H. Res. 561 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 27, 2010. 

Whereas, on May 10, 2009, the Onondaga Community College Lady Lazers defeated Monroe Community College 9– 

7 in the finals of the National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) Division I Women’s Lacrosse Tournament at Herkimer County Community College; 

Whereas the Lady Lazers won the national title in their first 

year of existence; 

Whereas the Lady Lazers’ players, coaches, and staff are excellent representatives of Onondaga Community College; 

Whereas Lauren Welch, Amanda Cizenski, and Emily Pierson 

were named 1st Team NJCAA All-Americans; and 

Whereas the residents of Onondaga County and fans are to 

be congratulated for their support, dedication, and pride 

in the team: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the Onondaga Community College Lady Lazers for win-
2 

•HRES 561 EH 

ning the National Junior College Athletic Association 

(NJCAA) Division I Women’s Lacrosse Tournament. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

Inconnection withthisReport on Form10-Qforthe three and six monthsended March 31, 2019(the “Report”)ofPennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”),asfiled withthe SecuritiesandExchange Commissiononthe datehereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplieswiththe requirementsof Section13(a)or15(d)ofthe SecuritiesExchange Act of1934, as amended;and

 

(2)  The informationcontainedinthe Report fairlypresents, inall material respects, the financial conditionandresultsof operationsoftheRegistrant.

 

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| /s/ Aviv Efrat                             |
| Name: Aviv Efrat                           |
| Title:   Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:   May 9, 2019              |
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96467) pertaining to the 1988
Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Share Incentive Plan of IOMED, Inc. of our report dated August 6, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IOMED, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Salt
Lake City, Utah
September 23, 2004

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1138 NORTH ALMA SCHOOL ROAD, SUITE 101

MESA, ARIZONA 85201

Telephone: 480.461.5300 | Fax: 480.833.9392

David R. Schwartz - #009264

das@udallshumway.com

Kimberly R. Davis - #030210

krd@udallshumway.com

Attorneys for Defendant Maricopa 

County Community College District

Maria Wise and Vivian Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISRICT OF ARIZONA

James Rogers and Judy Ellen Rogers, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

Maricopa County Community College 

District, a political subdivision of 

Arizona; Maria Wise, an individual; and

Vivian Miranda-Strawbridge, an 

individual 

Defendants.

NO. CV2018-00605 PHX-DWL

STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT 

TO ORDER (DKT 56) RE RULE 35 

EXAMINATION

Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate that this Court shall enter the form of 

amended order directing Plaintiff James Rogers to appear for and participate in a Rule 

35 psychiatric examination on April 19, 2019 beginning at 10 a.m. to be conducted by 

Stephen Herman, M.D. at 17470 N. Pacesetter Way, Scottsdale, AZ 85255. The only 

change to the previously entered order (Dkt 56) is the change of the date of the IME 

from April 5 to April 19. 

Counsel for Plaintiffs has reviewed this Stipulation and the proposed Order and

approved both. Counsel for Plaintiff has also authorized the electronic signing of this 

Stipulation by defense counsel.

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL Document 58 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: March 25, 2019.

UDALL SHUMWAY PLC

/s/ David R. Schwartz 

David R. Schwartz

Kimberly R. Davis 

1138 North Alma School Road

Suite 101

Mesa, AZ 85201

Attorneys for Defendant Maricopa County 

Community College District, Wise and Miranda

TORRES LAW GROUP PLC

/s/ David R. Schwartz for James E . Barton II

James E. Barton II 

2239 W. Baseline Road

Tempe, AZ 85283

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 25, 2019, I electronically lodged the attached 

document using ECF for filing and transmitted the document through ECF to the 

following registered ECF users:

Israel G. Torres

James E. Barton, II

Saman Golestan

TORRES LAW GROUP, PLLC

2239 W. Baseline Rd.

Tempe, AZ 85283

Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Kimberly Kershner

5428596.1

109883.024

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL Document 58 Filed 03/25/19 Page 2 of 2
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joshua W. Carden, SBN 021698

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

16427 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 410 

Scottsdale, AZ 85254

joshua@cardenlawfirm.com

(480) 454-1100 

(480) 454-1101 (Fax)

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeremy Thacker,

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC, et al.

Defendants.

No. 2:18-cv-00063-SMM

JOINT NOTICE OF 

SETTLEMENT

The parties to this matter hereby notify the Court that all claims in this matter have been 

settled. The parties are presently finalizing written terms and will file a stipulation of dismissal 

with prejudice as soon as possible. 

Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January, 2020,

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: s/Joshua W. Carden

Joshua W. Carden

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jeremy Thacker

STINSON LLP

By: /s/ Carrie M. Francis (with permission)

Carrie M. Francis

Stefan M. Palys

Michael Vincent

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:18-cv-00063-SMM Document 205 Filed 01/29/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

By:

SCHNEIDER & ONOFRY, PC 

/s/Timothy B. O’Connor (with permission)

Timothy B. O’Connor 

365 East Coronado Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 

Attorneys for Defendant Donat

Case 2:18-cv-00063-SMM Document 205 Filed 01/29/20 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2018

No. 04-17-00467-CV

Erasmo CANTU and Eugenia Cantu,

Appellants

v.

FALCON INTERNATIONAL BANK,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-08-26743-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the appellants’ motion for rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court