alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                               CERTIFICATE OF CEO

      I, Steven M. Skow, Chief Executive Officer of Integrity Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:

      (1)   the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this
            certificate is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
            with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


Dated: March 29, 2004
                                         /s/ Steven M. Skow
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Steven M. Skow, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Joe F Dickson, Chief Financial Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 11, 2010   /s/ Joe F. Dickson Joe F. Dickson Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0291. C. WAYNE FOUNTAIN v. SHARON KAY STANGE.

C. Wayne Fountain filed this application from the probate court’s order

discharging Sharon Stange asthe administrator of the estate of Arthur Don Watkins.

1

Under OCGA § 15-9-123 (a), a party in a civil case in probate court shall have the

right of appeal to an appellate court without first seeking review in superior court. 

A probate court is defined as “a probate court of a county having a population of

more than 90,000 persons according to the United States decennial census of 2010

or any future such census.” OCGA § 15-9-120 (2). According to the 2010 census,

Columbia County had a population of 124,053. Because the Probate Court of

Columbia County meets the statutory definition of a probate court, Fountain has a

right of direct appeal to this Court, and no application was required. See O’Regan v.

Brennan, 204 Ga. App. 50 (418 SE2d 389) (1992). 

Accordingly, the application for discretionary appeal is hereby GRANTED

pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Fountain shall have ten days from the date of this

order to file a notice of appeal in the probate court. OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). The clerk of

the probate court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted

to the Court of Appeals. 

1 Fountain filed the application with the Supreme Court, which transferred the

matter to this Court. Case No. S22D0678 (Feb. 22, 2022).

March 28, 2022
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/28/2022
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Robert Francis Krebs, 

 Defendant. 

CR 18-263-TUC-JGZ (JR)

O R D E R 

CONTINUING PLEA DEADLINE 

AND TRIAL 

 

 This case is presently set for trial on June 19, 2018. The Defendant filed 

a motion to continue and, for the reasons set forth therein, additional time is required 

to adequately prepare for trial. The Government has no objection to a continuance. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh 

the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial because, for the reasons 

set forth in the motion, failure to grant the continuance is likely to result in a miscarriage 

of justice if the Defendant is required to go to trial on the present trial date. 

 IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The date by which the referred magistrate judge hears the change of plea must 

be no later than August 3, 2018 by 3:00 p.m. 

 2. All motions, unless made during a hearing or trial, shall be in writing and shall 

be made sufficiently in advance of trial to comply with the time periods set forth in 

LRCiv. 7.2 and any court order and to avoid any delays in the trial. Pretrial motions may 

be heard before a magistrate judge and a Report and Recommendation will be provided to 

the district judge assigned to the case. 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 23 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. This matter is RESET for trial on August 21, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel are 

to be present at 9:00 a.m. 

 4. Excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7) is found to commence on 

June 20, 2018 and end on August 21, 2018. Such time shall be in addition to other 

excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act and shall commence as of the day following 

the day that would otherwise be the last day for commencement of trial. 

 5. That any and all subpoenas previously issued shall remain in full force and 

effect through the new trial date. 

 6. Any motion or stipulation to continue the scheduled trial date and change 

of plea deadline shall be filed with the Clerk of Court no later than 5:00 p.m., 

Monday, August 6, 2018. Alternatively, by that same deadline, if after consultation 

between government and defense counsel it is determined that a motion to continue 

the scheduled trial date and change of plea deadline will not be filed, government 

counsel shall notify the Court by an email to the chambers email address that the 

case and counsel are ready to proceed to trial on the scheduled trial date. The 

notification shall also include the estimated number of trial days needed to complete 

the trial. 

 Dated this 1st day of June, 2018. 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 23 Filed 06/01/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29740-29741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14934]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29741]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 060696D]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and its 
Law Enforcement Committee, Monkfish Committee (with Advisors), and 
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Committee will hold public 
meetings.

DATES: The meetings will be held on June 25-27, 1996. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION for specific dates and times.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Doubletree Inn (at 
airport), 4101 Island Avenue, Philadelphia, PA; telephone: 1-800-222-
TREE.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. 
New Street, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: 302-674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Keifer, Executive Director; 
telephone: 302-674-2331, extension 18.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 25, the Law Enforcement Committee 
will meet from 10:00 a.m. until noon. The Monkfish Committee will meet 
from 1:00-5:00 p.m. On June 26, the Council will meet from 8:00 a.m. 
until noon, and the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Committee 
will meet as a Council Committee of the Whole from 1:00-4:00 p.m. On 
June 27, the Council will meet from 8:00 a.m. until approximately noon.
    The purpose of the meetings is to review NMFS Strategic Plan and 
enforcement issues on fishery management plans (FMP), review possible 
management measures for monkfish, review hearing comments for Amendment 
5 to Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP and adopt for 
Secretarial approval, and adopt Amendment 6 to Atlantic Mackerel, 
Squid, and Butterfish FMP for public hearings. We will also have a 
presentation on the HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) 
Program.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Joanna Davis (see ADDRESSES) at 
least 5 days prior to the meeting dates.

    Dated: June 7, 1996.
Richard H. Schaefer,
Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-14934 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the period ended December 27, 2015 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





/s/ William P. MattWilliam P. MattChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


Date: May 18, 2016
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 19
- 00247
- CV

__________________ IN RE M.B.

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 418th D istrict Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19
- 03
- 04129
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER Relator M.B. file d a petition for writ of mandamus. The relator is the maternal grandfather of the children in trial cause number 19

- 03

- 04129

- CV , the underlying suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. Relator seeks a writ compelling the trial judge to withdraw his order striking relator’s petition to intervene in the case. We note our jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2018). Relator alleges that prejudice will result if the current trial setting occurs before the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved. The2 Court finds that temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It is ORDERED that the final trial in this case is STAYED until our Opinion issues or unti l further order of this Court. T he Court denies the Relator ’ s request to stay all further proceedings

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relator as a condition to any of the relief herein granted. The response s of the real part ies in interest, L.M. and the Department of Family and Protective Services, are due August 23, 2019

. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED IN PART

. ORDER ENTERED August 13, 2019.
PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.04



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into ATMI Inc.'s previously filed
Registration Statement File Nos. 33-77060, 33-93048, 333-49561, 333-49561, 333-
56349, 333-55827, 333-82089 and 333-94641. We also consent to the application of
our reports to the schedule labeled "Valuation and Qualifying Accounts" as of
the dates and period covered by our reports .



Rath, Anders, Dr. Wanner & Partner
Munich, Germany
February 25, 2000


/s/ Kabisch
Dipl. -Kfm. Kabisch
Vereidigter Buchprufer


/s/ Metzler
Dipl. -Kfm. Metzler
Wirtschaftsprufer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,578
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,050
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,578
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (666)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,245)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)



</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 District of Arizona

ADULT PRINTED DIAPERS, LLC

2:18-cv-00370-DJH

REARZ, Inc., Cooshie Tooshiez, LLC D/B/A/ Crown

Diapers, Faithfulness, LLC, Personal Care Medical

Supplies, The Bottom Half Group, LLC, Northeast

Mobility Center, SoftCradle.com, Daynitecare.ca,

Littleforbig.com

Northeast Mobility Center

115 Everett Road

Albany, NY 12205

Justin Clark

J. Clark Law Firm, PLLC

40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Case 2:18-cv-00370-SMB Document 12 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:18-cv-00370-DJH 0.00

Case 2:18-cv-00370-SMB Document 12 Filed 02/21/18 Page 2 of 2
#### Robert B. BARBER, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF WATER AND POLLUTION CONTROL, Respondent.

No. 50096.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 29, 1995.

George A Wheeler, Kansas City, for appellant.

Kathleen Hauser, City Atty., Dorothy L. Campbell, Asst. City Atty., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and ULRICH and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from termination of employment.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2658

_____________________________

JAMES MICHAEL HAWLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

June 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

James Michael Hawley, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit32.2

Certification of Principal Financial and AccountingOfficer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof AirGate PCS, Inc. (the "Company") for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Kendall Cowan, as PrincipalFinancial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Kendall W.Cowan

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

|        |  |                                           |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|-------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name:  |  | KendallW. Cowan                           |
| Title: |  | Principal Financial andAccounting Officer |
| Date:  |  | August 9,2005                             |
|        |

This certification accompaniesthe Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60625 Summary Calendar

RAFAEL MARTINEZ RODRIGUEZ, also known as Rafael Martinez ,
Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER , JR. , U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent

Petition s for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A036 421 288

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rafael Martinez Rodriguez (Martinez) , a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of both the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings and his motion to reconsider that denial. He does not challenge the BIA’s holding that his motion to reopen was untimely under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) and 8 C.F.R.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 28, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60625 Document: 00512817095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2014N o. 13

- 60625

§ 1003.2(c) but, rather, argues only that the BIA abused its discretion by holding that (1) the departure bar set forth in § 1003.2(d) prevented it from exercising its sua sponte authority to reopen and (2) even if the departure bar did not apply, sua sponte reopening pursuant to § 1003.2(a) was not warranted. Contrary to Martinez’s assertions, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider his challenge to the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen. See Ramos

- Bonilla v. Mukasey , 543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th Cir. 2008). As Martinez’s motion to reopen was time barred, we need not address his arguments regarding the BIA’s application of the departure bar.
See id. His petitions for review are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

2 Case: 13-60625 Document: 00512817095 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2014
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Narachi, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.; and

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.

Date: August 14, 2017



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael A. Narachi               
|Michael A. Narachi                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer