alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON

Senior U.S. District Judge: Raner C. Collins Date: November 20, 2019

USA v. Scott Daniel Warren Case Number: CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (DTF)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Anna Wright/Nathaniel Walters/Glenn McCormick

Attorney for Defendant: Gregory Kuykendall/Amy Knight (Retained)

Deputy Clerk: Sherry Gammon

Court Reporter: Erica McQuillen

Interpreter: N/A 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL: Day 6

9:24 a.m. – In absence of the jury, the Court issues a ruling regarding the previously argued issue of 

the testimony of Defense witness Susannah Brown. The Court does not find the witness unavailable 

and her testimony is not admitted. 

The jury enters at 9:40 a.m.

A stipulation regarding the material witnesses is read into the record by the Court. 

The Defense rests at 9:41 a.m. 

The Government does not call rebuttal witnesses. 

9:42 a.m. – The Government’s closing argument is presented by Mr. Walters. 

Recess taken 10:07 a.m. - 10:17 a.m.

The Defendant’s closing argument is presented by Mr. Kuykendall. 

Recess taken 11:17 a.m. - 11:27 a.m.

The Government’s rebuttal closing argument is presented by Mr. Walters. 

The jury is instructed at 11:57 a.m. 

12:18 p.m. – Jurors #31, 41, 35 and 36 are selected as alternates.

Lunch recess is taken 12:20 p.m.-1:25 p.m. Lunch is provided to the jurors and the alternates. The 

alternates are excused and jurors begin deliberation.

A verdict is received at 3:15 p.m.

The jury enters at 3:35 p.m. The Defendant is found Not Guilty as to Counts 2 and 3 of the 

Indictment. 

The jury is polled. 

The jury is excused at 3:51 p.m. 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 394 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 2
USA v. Scott Daniel Warren Date: November 20, 2019 

Case Number: CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (DTF) Page 2 of 2

Page 2 of 2

In absence of the jury, the Court issues a ruling as to the Defendant’s case 17-00341MJ-TUC-RCC. 

(See separate minute entry filed in the Defendant’s case 17-00341MJ-TUC-RCC). 

Jury Trial: 2 Hours 43 Minutes

Start: 9:24 a.m. Stop: 3:51 p.m.

Jury deliberation: 2 Hours 10 Minutes

1:25 p.m. – 3:35 p.m. 

 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 394 Filed 11/20/19 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries
                                       of
                                U S Liquids Inc.


Advanced Management Systems, Inc.
Amigo Diversified Services, Inc.
Dombrowski & Holmes, Inc.
MCS Transportation, Inc.
Northern A-1 Sanitation Services Inc.
Parallel Products of Florida, Inc.
Parallel Products of Kentucky, Inc.
Romic Environmental Technologies Corp.
STA Decanting, Inc.
The National Solvent Exchange Corp.
USL City Environmental, Inc.
USL General Management, Inc.
USL Parallel Products of California
Earth Blends, Inc.
MBO, Inc.
Re-Claim Environmental Louisiana LLC
Re-Claim Environmental, Inc.
U S Liquids of Illinois, Inc.
USL First Source, Inc.
U S Liquids Terminal Services, Inc.
US Liquids LP Holding Co.
US Liquids Northeast, Inc.
US Liquids of Texas, Inc.
USL City Environmental Services of Florida, Inc.
Waste Stream Environmental, Inc.
US Liquids of LA., L.P.
GEM Management, Inc.
USL Management Limited Partnership
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |                                                               |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      March 11, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Kwok-Keung Liu                                            |   |
|                       |   | Kwok-Keung      Liu                                                |   |
|                       |   | President                                                          |   |
|                       |   | (principal      executive officer and principal financial officer) |   |
H. Res. 562 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 26, 2009. 

Whereas, on May 25, 2009, the Syracuse University Orange 

defeated the Cornell Big Red 10–9 in overtime, in the 

finals of the National Collegiate Athletic Association 

(NCAA) Division I Men’s Lacrosse Tournament in Foxboro, Massachusetts; 

Whereas the Orange now hold 11 men’s lacrosse national titles, the most in NCAA History; 

Whereas Orange head coach John Desko won his fifth NCAA 

title; 

Whereas the Orange players, coaches, and staff are excellent 

representatives of Syracuse University; 

Whereas the Orange showed tremendous spirit in the championship game, coming back from what appeared to be an 

insurmountable three-goal deficit with less than four minutes to go, only to win the game in overtime; and 

Whereas the residents of Syracuse and fans are to be congratulated for their support, dedication, and pride in the 

team: Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 562 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Syracuse University for winning the National Collegiate 

Athletic Association Division I Men’s Lacrosse Tournament. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Scott Daniel Warren,

Defendant.

CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (DTF)

ORDER 

The Court has reviewed the Defendant’s Motion to Clarify Order on Redactions to 

Video Depositions (Doc. 368), and the Government’s Response thereto; 

IT IS ORDERED the additional redactions sought by the Defense are Granted.

Dated this 6th day of November, 2019.

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 370 Filed 11/06/19 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  SOHU.COM INC.

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derek Palaschuk,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2002
     and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
     31, 2002.

                                                   /s/ Derek Palaschuk
                                                   -------------------

                                                   Derek Palaschuk, Senior Vice
                                                   President and Chief Financial
                                                   Officer

                                                   March 28, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30052-30053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14991]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM96-10-23-001]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 7, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 5, 1996, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company 
(ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets in the above 
captioned docket, with proposed effective dates of April 1, 1996 and 
May 1, 1996, respectively.

[[Page 30053]]

To Be Effective April 1, 1996

Sub 1st Rev Sub Seventy-Eighth Rev Sheet No. 6
1st Rev Sub Forty-Second Rev Sheet No. 12A
Sub 1st Rev Thirty-First Rev Sheet No. 14A
Sub 1st Rev Twenty-Ninth Rev Sheet No. 15A

To Be Effective May 1, 1996

Sub 1st Rev Seventy-Ninth Rev Sheet No. 6
Sub Thirty-Second Rev Sheet No. 14A
Sub Thirtieth Rev Sheet No 15A

    On May 1, 1996, ESNG filed with the Commission revised rates to 
track a) storage service purchased from Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) under Transco's Rate Schedules GSS and LSS the 
costs of which are included in the rates and charges payable under 
ESNG's Rate Schedules GSS and LSS effective beginning April 1, 1996 and 
b) storage service purchased from Columbia Gas Transmission (Columbia) 
under Columbia's Rate Schedules SST and FSS the costs of which are 
included in the rates and charges payable under ESNG's Rate Schedules 
CWS and CFSS effective April 1, 1996 and May 1, 1996. It has since come 
to SNG's attention, per FERC Order dated May 29, 1996, that ESNG's 
original filing contained various errors. Therefore, the instant filing 
is being made to correct those various errors contained in the original 
filing.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Section 325.211). All such 
protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14991 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO PENA CASTILLO,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 71701

Agency No. A205

- 526

- 997

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Pena Castillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal

and relief under the Conv ention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 71701

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008) , and we deny the

petition for review.

Substantial eviden ce support s the agency’ s determination that the threat of

harm Pena Castillo experienced in Mexico did not rise to the level of persecution.

See Lim v. INS , 22 4 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir. 2000) ; see also Prasad v. INS , 47 F.3d

336, 340 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Alth ough a reasonable factfinder could have found this

incident sufficient to establish past persecution, we do not believe that a factfinder

would be compelled to do so.”) (emphasis in original)

. As to his fear of future

harm, Pena Castillo does not contest the agency’s conclusion that he failed to

demonstrate it would be unreasonable for him to relocate within Mexico. See

Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, we

deny the petition as to Pena Castillo’s withhold of removal claim.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Pena Castillo failed to show i t is more likely than not that he would be tortured by

or with the consent or acquiescence of the Mexican government. See Zheng v.

Holder , 644 F.3d 829, 835

- 36 (9th Cir. 2011) (finding that petitioner’ s claims of

possible torture were speculative and therefore did not compel reversal).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-36995 and 333-70475) pertaining to the 1997 Director'sOption Plan, 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Stock Plan of Indus International, Inc. of ourreport dated March 13, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofIndus International, Inc.included in this  Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 1999.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Palo Alto, CaliforniaApril 12, 2000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7740

MONTUSA KARUNDO T. PACE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:08-cv-00148-JBF-TEM) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 24, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Montusa Karundo T. Pace, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Montusa Karundo T. Pace seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pace has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 19, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. White, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ JAMES D. WHITEJames D. WhiteChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: May 23, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 78 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 78

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 22, 2009.
    Resolved, That the following members are, and are hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees:
     Committee on Agriculture-- Mr. Cassidy.
     Committee on the Budget-- Mr. Aderholt of Alabama, to rank after Mr. Nunes 
of California, and Mr. Harper.
     Committee on Energy and Commerce-- Mr. Scalise.
     Committee on Oversight and Government Reform-- Mr. Schock.
     Committee on Science and Technology-- Mr. Smith of Nebraska, to rank after 
Mr. Bilbray.
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure-- Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Cao, Mr. 
Schock, and Mr. Olson, all to rank after Mr. Latta.
     Committee on Veterans' Affairs-- Mr. Lamborn, to rank after Mr. Bilbray, 
and Mr. Roe of Tennessee .
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jason Hanson, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)          
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Search By Headlines.com Corp. for the
quarterly period ended October 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Search By
Headlines.com Corp.

Dated: December 9, 2009



/s/ Jason
HansonJason Hanson President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)







A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Search By
Headlines.com Corp. and will be retained by Search By Headlines.com Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

The Satanic Temple, Inc. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

City of Scottsdale,

Defendant.

No. CV 18-00621-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation and Joint Motion to Extend Time for 

Joint Pretrial Order. Doc. 70.

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation and Joint Motion to Extend Time for Joint 

Pretrial Order (Doc. 70) is granted. The parties shall file their proposed Joint Pretrial Order, 

proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and motions in limine no later than 

January 3, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.

Dated this 27th day of December, 2019.

Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 71 Filed 12/27/19 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Disaster
      Preparedness Systems, Inc., (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31,2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
      J.
      Henrickson ,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/Mark
                J. HenricksonMark
                J. Henrickson
              
              October
                22, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13511]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on June 11, 1996, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and matters 
the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, June 11, 1996--1:30 p.m. until 3:30 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. It may also discuss the status of appointment of members to 
the ACRS. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: May 23, 1996
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 96-13511 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P