Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 12, 1996 / Proposed Rules 29725

Dated: May 31, 1996.

Mary D. Nichols,

Assistant Administrator for Air and

Radiation.

References

McClellan, R.O. (1989) Letter from Chairman

of Clean Air Scientific Advisory

Committee to the EPA Administrator

concerning ‘‘closure’’ on the Ozone

Criteria Document Supplement and the

Ozone Staff Paper, dated May 1, 1989.

Shy, C.; Lippmann, M.; Stolwijk, J.; and

Speizer, F. (1996). Letter to

Administrator Carol M. Browner

regarding Supplement to the Closure

Letter from the Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee. March 20, 1996.

Wolff, G.T. (1995a) Letter from George T.

Wolff, Chair, Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee (CASAC) to

Administrator Carol M. Browner. Closure

letter by CASAC on the Air Quality

Criteria for Ozone and Related

Photochemical Oxidants. November 28,

1995.

Wolff, G.T. (1995b) Letter from George T.

Wolff, Chair, Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee (CASAC) to

Administrator Carol M. Browner. Closure

letter by CASAC on the Primary

Standard Portion of the Staff Paper for

Ozone. November 30, 1995.

Wolff, G.T. (1996a) Letter from George T.

Wolff, Chair, Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee (CASAC) to

Administrator Carol M. Browner. Closure

letter by CASAC on draft Air Quality

Criteria for Particulate Matter. March 15,

1996.

Wolff, G.T. (1996b) Letter from George T.

Wolff, Chair, Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee (CASAC) to

Administrator Carol M. Browner. Closure

letter by CASAC on the Secondary

Standard Portion of the Staff Paper for

Ozone. April 4, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96–14912 Filed 6–11–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 014–0003b; FRL–5464–5]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision, Five

Local Air Pollution Control Districts

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) which

concern the control of volatile organic

compound (VOC) emissions from

graphic arts operations.

The intended effect of proposing

approval of these rules is to regulate

emissions of VOCs in accordance with

the requirements of the Clean Air Act,

as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

In the Final Rules Section of this

Federal Register, the EPA is approving

the state’s SIP revision as a direct final

rule without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision and anticipates no adverse

comments. A detailed rationale for this

approval is set forth in the direct final

rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this action. Any parties interested in

commenting on this action should do so

at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by July 12,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Daniel A.

Meer, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3), Air

and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Copies of the rules and EPA’s

evaluation report of each rule are

available for public inspection at EPA’s

Region 9 office during normal business

hours. Copies of the submitted rules are

also available for inspection at the

following locations:

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Divison, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95812

El Dorado County APCD, 2850 Fairlane

Court, Placerville, CA 95667

Kern County APCD, 2700 M. Street,

Suite 290, Bakersfield, CA 93301

Placer County APCD, 11464 B. Avenue,

Auburn, CA 95603

Santa Barbara County APCD, 26

Castilian Drive, B–23, Goleta, CA

93117

South Coast AQMD, 21865 E. Copley

Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765–4182

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik

H. Beck, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3),

Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901, Telephone:

(415) 744–1190, Internet E–Mail:

beck.erik@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

action concerns: El Dorado County Air

Pollution Control District (EDCAPCD)

Rule 231 ‘‘Graphic Arts Operations’’;

Kern County Air Pollution Control

District (KCAPCD) Rule 410.7, ‘‘Graphic

Arts’’; Placer County Air Pollution

Control District (PCAPCD) Rule 239

‘‘Graphic Arts Operations’’; Santa

Barbara County Air Pollution Control

District (SBCAPCD) Rule 354, ‘‘Graphic

Arts’’; and South Coast Air Quality

Management District (SCAQMD) Rule

1130.1, ‘‘Screen Printing Operations’’.

These rules were submitted by the

California Air Resources Board (CARB)

to EPA on the following dates in

respective order: November 30, 1994;

May 30, 1991; October 13, 1995; July 13,

1994; and November 18, 1993. For

further information, please see the

information provided in the Direct Final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: April 13, 1996.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–14785 Filed 6–11–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–W

40 CFR Part 62

[TN–115–01–9616b; FRL–5519–7]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans;

Tennessee; Approval of Revisions to

Process Emission Standards for Total

Reduced Sulfur Emissions From Kraft

Mills

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the State implementation plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the State of

Tennessee for the purpose of revising

the current regulations for Total

Reduced Sulfur (TRS) from Kraft Mills.

In the final rules section of this Federal

Register, the EPA is approving the

State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.