alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13891]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT ASSESSMENT COMMISSION


Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the meeting of the Prospective Payment 
Assessment Commission on Wednesday, June 12, 1996, at the Madison 
Hotel, 15th & M Streets, NW, Washington, DC, 202/862-1600.
    The Full Commission will convene at 9:00 a.m. on June 12, 1996, and 
adjourn at approximately 12:15 p.m. The meeting will be held in 
Executive Chambers 1, 2, and 3.
    The meeting is open to the public.
Donald A. Young,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 96-13891 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                       Calculation of Earnings per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                December 31
                                                                                  2000              1999             1998
                                                                                  ----              ----             ----
<S>                                                                           <C>               <C>               <C>
Weighted Average shares Outstanding                                             2,302,443         2,319,588        2,312,422

Common Stock Equivalents                                                               --                --            6,731

Average Common Shares and Equivalents, Fully Diluted                            2,302,443         2,319,588        2,319,153

Net income                                                                     $  971,617        $  690,295       $1,002,844

Basic Earnings per Share                                                       $     0.42        $     0.30       $     0.43

Diluted Earnings per Share                                                     $     0.42        $     0.30       $     0.43
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 17, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 06-40650

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee v. ENRIQUE GUZMAN Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Victoria

--------------------- Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion to summarily affirm the judgment in part is GRANTED.
IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion to vacate the judgment in part is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion to remand case for resentencing in light of Lopez v. Gonzales isGRANTED.
#### Kevin ROBERTS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 70022.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 1, 1996.

Judith C. LaRose, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, after an evidentiary hearing, for ineffective assistance- of counsel. The court found Movant failed to prove his counsel was ineffective. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### GNB, INC., Petitioner, v. COLLIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Respondent.

No. D-4386.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 9, 1994.

Rehearing Overruled May 11, 1994.

*660George Walter McCool, Austin, for petitioner.

Judith A. Knies, Russell R. Graham, Austin, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Recently in *H.L. Farm Corp. v. Self,*1994 WL 178885 (Tex.1994), we held that Texas Tax Code § 23.56(3) violates article I, section 3 of the Texas Constitution. Section 23.56(3) provides that land is ineligible for appraisal as open-space land if it—

> is owned by a corporation, partnership, trust, or other legal entity if the entity is required by federal law or by rule adopted pursuant to federal law to register its ownership or acquisition of that land and a nonresident alien or foreign government or any combination of nonresident aliens and foreign governments own a majority interest in the entity.

Before *H.L. Farm*was decided, the court of appeals in this case affirmed a trial court judgment holding that the statute did not violate article I, section 3 of the Texas Constitution. 862 S.W.2d 52. The lower courts held that § 23.56(3) had properly been applied to deny appraisal of land owned by GNB, Inc. as open-space land. GNB is a Delaware corporation indirectly owned by a nonresident, Australian corporation. The decisions of the lower courts directly conflict with our decision in *H.L. Farm.*

Accordingly, a majority of this Court grants GNB’s application for writ of error and, without hearing oral argument, reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and remands the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Tex.R.Civ.P. 170.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION www.edgaradvantage.com


QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
 

Exhibit 10.9

Confidential treatment requested  




  
      FIRST AMENDMENT
  TO THE
  LICENSE AGREEMENT         


    This First Amendment (the "Amendment") to the License Agreement ("License Agreement") is made effective as of January 31, 2000 (the "Effective Date") by
and between MABTECH AB, formed under the laws of Sweden ("MAB") and SEATTLE GENETICS, INC., a Delaware corporation ("SGI"). 




  RECITALS         


    MAB and SGI entered into the License Agreement dated as of June 14, 1998 pursuant to which MAB agreed to provide SGI access to the
[*] antibody and the exclusive license to make, use, offer for sale, sell, import or otherwise distribute products that embody the [*] antibody. 



    MAB
and SGI now wish to amend the License Agreement in certain respects as hereinafter provided and in consideration for the amendments made herein, SGI shall pay MAB
[*] U.S. Dollars (U.S.$[*]) within ten (10) days of execution of this Amendment. 


    Except
as otherwise provided herein, definitions of capitalized words shall be those set forth in the License Agreement. 


    The
parties now agree as follows: 


  AMENDMENT         


    A.  Section 4.2
of the License Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


    "4.2  Milestone Payment.  SGI shall pay MAB a one-time milestone payment of
[*] U.S. Dollars (U.S.$[*]) within thirty (30) days following SGI's first filing of an investigational new drug application with the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration, or an equivalent filing in one or more European countries, covering a Licensed Product. In addition, SGI shall pay MAB a one-time milestone payment of
[*] U.S. Dollars (U.S.$[*]) within thirty (30) days following the commencement of the first Phase III clinical trial covering a Licensed
Product." 


    B.  Section 4.3.1
of the License Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


    "4.3.1 SGI
shall pay MAB a royalty equal to [*] percent ([*]%) on Net Sales of Licensed Products,
commencing with the First Commercial Sale of a Licensed Product." 




  ENTIRE AGREEMENT         



    Except as provided otherwise herein, all other terms and conditions of the License Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


[*]   Confidential treatment requested 


1







    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 



	 	 	SEATTLE GENETICS, INC.
	 

 	 
 	 

By:	 
 	 

/s/ H. PERRY FELL   

	 	 	Name:	 	H. Perry Fell
	 	 	Title:	 	President
	 

 	 
 	 
 MABTECH AB
	 

 	 
 	 

By:	 
 	 

/s/ STAFFAN PAULIC   

	 	 	Name:	 	Staffan Paulic
	 	 	Title:	 	Man. Dir.
	 	 	Its:	 	President




2








QuickLinks


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LICENSE AGREEMENT

RECITALS

AMENDMENT

ENTIRE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Stephen E. King, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Intentionally omitted].

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                                      |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Stephen E. King                                   |  |  |  |                        
|Stephen E. King, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Date: November 20, 2006
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24-0256
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. ORDER CHARLES DAVID AMENT, 

# FILED
Defendant and Appellant. 

### MAY - 3 2024

BOVVUO :wood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana When self-represented Appellant Charles David Ament filed his Notice ofAppeal of a Flathead County District Court's Judgment and Sentence, he filed a "Motion for Summary Ruling on Appeal" as well. The State ofMontana responds in opposition. On May 1, 2024, this Court denied Ament's petition for rehearing concerning our earlier denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. Ament v. Heino, No. OP 24-0117, Order (Mont. May 1, 2024). The State responds that Ament's motion is improper. Citing to the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, the State points out that Ament must file the opening brief, pursuant to M. R. App. P. 12 and 13, and that the State will file its response brief. The State addsthat Ament's openingbriefisnot yet due. The State provides that thetranscripts have not been filed, making the record on appeal incomplete. There is no provision in this Court's rules for Ament's Motion for a Summary Ruling. As detailed by the State, he must comply with these rules to proceed with his appeal. Ament will receive a notice from the office ofthe Clerk of the Supreme Court when the transcripts have been received. Additionally, Ament may file a motion for appointmentofcounsel withthisCourt forhis criminal appeal. Section 46-8-103(1),MCA. Therefore, 05/03/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0256ITIS ORDEREDthatAment'sMotion for Summary RulingonAppeal isDENIED.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to Charles Davide Ament along with a copy ofthis Court's Appellate Handbook.

rel DATED this — day ofMay, 2024. For the Court,

ChiefJustice

2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29083-29084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14352]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-245-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Section 4 Filing

June 3, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 28, 1996, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG) tendered for filing pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, 
a notice of termination of gathering service on five specified 
gathering pipelines in Clearfield County, Pennsylvania. CNG states that 
the pipelines will be abandoned by sale to CNG Producing Company, an 
affiliate of CNG. CNG requests that the effective date for the 
termination of service by July 1, 1996. CNG states that no contract for 
transportation service will be canceled or terminated as a result of 
this abandonment.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. Pursuant to Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all such motions or protests must be filed no later than 
June 10, 1996. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding.

[[Page 29084]]

Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14352 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DDi
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Michael Dodson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ J. MICHAEL DODSONJ. Michael DodsonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: February 22, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 583 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 583

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 26, 2010.
Whereas Lester Flatt was born on June 19, 1914, and was raised in the region of 
        Sparta, Tennessee;
Whereas Lester Flatt began playing guitar and singing in local churches at a 
        young age;
Whereas Lester Flatt began his career with Charlie Monroe and the Kentucky 
        Pardners in North Carolina in the early 1940s;
Whereas in 1945, Lester Flatt was invited by Bill Monroe to play rhythm guitar 
        and sing with Monroe's band on the Grand Ole Opry;
Whereas Lester Flatt, Earl Scruggs, Chubby Wise, Howard Watts, and Bill Monroe 
        are widely credited with the creation of bluegrass music through their 
        band, Bill Monroe and the Bluegrass Boys;
Whereas Lester Flatt later joined with Earl Scruggs to create the band Flatt and 
        Scruggs and the Foggy Mountain Boys, which remains one of the most 
        influential bands in bluegrass music;
Whereas in 1969, Lester Flatt parted with Scruggs to form the band Nashville 
        Grass, with whom he performed until shortly before his death on May 11, 
        1979;
Whereas in 1991, Lester Flatt, along with Bill Monroe and Earl Scruggs, became 
        an inaugural member of the International Bluegrass Music Hall of Fame; 
        and
Whereas Lester Flatt is widely regarded as one of the greatest bluegrass 
        musicians and singers of all time, writing dozens of songs that are 
        considered bluegrass classics: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that Lester 
Flatt has made an invaluable contribution to American art as both a songwriter 
and a performer, leaving an indelible legacy in bluegrass music.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Robert Dale SCHLUP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41179.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 22, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 3, 1989.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 14, 1989.

Thomas J. Marshall, Public Defender, Moberly, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Ronald L. Jurgeson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SHANGLER, J. Presiding, and LOWENSTEIN and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Robert Dale Schlup, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking an order to set aside his guilty pleas, convictions, and sentences for kidnapping (§ 565.110, RSMo 1986), and . stealing *721(§ 570.030, RSMo 1986). The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Aspire Japan, Inc., for the Quarter ending April 30, 2007 I, Ken Osako, Chief
      Financial Officer of Aspire Japan, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
Such
      amended
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The
      information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      period ended April 30, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Aspire Japan, Inc.




Dated:
                August 30, 2007






**Aspire
      Japan, Inc.**




By:
            */s/
                Ken Osako*
              Chief
                Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51141, Inc., for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51141, Inc. hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.      SuchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended July 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of 51141, Inc. 

 
| Dated: September 12, 2005 |
|---------------------------|

 

**51141, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/  Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeremy Thacker, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GPS Insight LLC, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-18-00063-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Notice of Discovery Dispute 

(Doc. 55). On the Court's own motion, 

 IT IS ORDERED setting a Telephonic Discovery Dispute Hearing for July 26, 

2018 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel will receive dial-in instructions for the teleconference 

separately via electronic mail prior to the hearing. 

Dated this 16th day of July, 2018. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 56 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 515 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 515

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 9, 2009.
Whereas on June 1, 2009, Private William Long, 23, was murdered outside the Army 
        Navy Career Center in Little Rock, Arkansas;
Whereas on June 1, 2009, Private Quinton Ezeagwula, 18, was wounded by gunfire 
        outside the Army Navy Career Center in Little Rock, Arkansas;
Whereas there are more than 1,400,000 active component and more than 1,200,000 
        reserve component members of the Armed Forces protecting America;
Whereas there are more than 8,000 Army and Army Reserve recruiters and more than 
        7,000 Navy recruiters serving at more than 1,500 military recruiting 
        stations and centers in United States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Europe;
Whereas the men and women of the Armed Forces risk their lives every day to 
        preserve America's freedom and to defend the liberty, security, and 
        prosperity enjoyed by the American people;
Whereas service in the Armed Forces entails special hazards and demands 
        extraordinary sacrifices from service members;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces are the targets of violence not only abroad 
        but in the United States as well; and
Whereas such violence is despicable and must not be tolerated: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) offers its condolences to the family of Private William Long;
            (2) hopes for a full recovery for Private Quinton Ezeagwula; and
            (3) urges that the perpetrator or perpetrators of this senseless 
        shooting be brought to justice.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```