alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

Douglas Haig, 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

)

)

NO. 18-mj-00105-MHB

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLY 

WITH RELEASE ORDER

Pursuant to Defendant’s Motion to Extend Time to Comply with Release Order, the 

Government and Pretrial Services having no objections, and good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED extending the deadline to comply with this Court’s Order to remove 

weapons, ammunition, reloading and ammunition equipment, and firearms from Defendant’s 

possession or house until Friday, February 9, 2018 at 5:00 pm.

DATED this ______day of _______________________, 2018.

Honorable Judge

United States District Court 

Case 2:18-mj-00105-MHB Document 7-1 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 565 Received in Senate (RDS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 565

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2009

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Appointing and authorizing managers for the impeachment of Samuel B. 
  Kent, a judge of the United States District Court for the Southern 
                           District of Texas.

    Resolved, That Mr. Schiff, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Mr. 
Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Goodlatte, and Mr. Sensenbrenner are appointed 
managers on the part of the House to conduct the trial of the 
impeachment of Samuel B. Kent, a judge of the United States District 
Court for the Southern District of Texas, that a message be sent to the 
Senate to inform the Senate of these appointments, and that the 
managers on the part of the House may exhibit the articles of 
impeachment to the Senate and take all other actions necessary in 
connection with preparation for, and conduct of, the trial, which may 
include the following:
            (1) Employing legal, clerical, and other necessary 
        assistants and incurring such other expenses as may be 
        necessary, to be paid from amounts available to the Committee 
        on the Judiciary under House Resolution 279, One Hundred 
        Eleventh Congress, agreed to March 31, 2009, or any other 
        applicable expense resolution on vouchers approved by the 
        Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary.
            (2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing with the 
        Secretary of the Senate, on the part of the House of 
        Representatives, any subsequent pleadings which they consider 
        necessary.

            Attest:

                                                  NANCY PELOSI,

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

JO HN HENRY MASSIE , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 542 L T Case No. 1986

- CF

- 003285

- B

- O S TATE OF FLORIDA , A ppellee

.

_

_______________________________/ O pinion filed July 8, 2022 3.80 0 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Orange County , Elaine A. B arbour , Judge. John Henry Massie, Doral, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney G eneral, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant A ttorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM

. D ue to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in Orange County Circuit Court Case Number 1986

- CF

- 003285 -B-2 O , this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se fi lings. In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Orange County Circuit Court Case N umber 1986

- CF

- 003285 -B-O

. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced

case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State , 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020) ; Simpkins v. State , 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
SANCTIONS IMPOSED.

C OHEN, EDWARDS and SASSO , JJ., concur.
#### La May and Poudrier, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Edward Smith, Respondent.

County Court, Suffolk County,

February 10, 1956.

*844
      *Odenwald & Younghans*for appellant.

*Charles W. Root*for respondent.

Fred J. Munder, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Justice’s Court of the Town of Huntington, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint upon a demurrer interposed by the defendant.

The complaint alleged the performance of work and furnishing of materials by plaintiff in the improvement of certain real property acquired by the defendant after such work and materials were supplied and after the notice of lien had been filed. It alleged a contract not with the defendant but with his predecessor in title. The plaintiff seeks to impose a contractual liability on the defendant because of his acquisition of the land ' ‘ with knowledge of the existence of said lien against the * * * premises ”.

The plaintiff brought his action under section 46 of the Lien Law which, to some extent, permits the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien in a court not of record. It provides that the action shall be commenced by the personal service upon the owner of a summons and verified complaint. If a judgment is obtained the notice of lien is given effect by permitting the sale of the premises on execution as of the date of the filing of the notice of lien.

Section 46 does not authorize service on other lienors or encumbrancers. It is not an equitable action. It is an action at law and must be based upon a contractual liability of the defendant.

Where title has passed from the one who incurred the contractual liability and the lienor wishes to predicate his action on the security of his lien, he must pursue his remedy in a court of record with equitable powers. Should he seek his remedy in a court not of record under section 46 of the Lien Law he may sue only the obligor on the contract. Taking title to land subject to a lien, even with full knowledge thereof, does not create or amount to an assumption of personal contractual liability. (See *Gilmour*v. *Colcord,*183 N. Y. 342; *Faville*v. *Hadcock,*39 Misc. 397; *Bowerman*v. *Stahl,*92 N. Y. S. 2d 842.)

The judgment herein is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of FirstBank Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Thaddeus M. Williams, Acting Chief Executive Officerof the Company, and I, Lisa J. Maxwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       To my knowledge, the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Thaddeus M. Williams                           |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thaddeus M.  Williams, Acting President and C.E.O. |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                     |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                               |
|   | /s/ Lisa J. Maxwell                                |   |
|   | Lisa J.  Maxwell, C.F.O.                           |
|   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)      |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                               |
|   | August 10,  2005                              |   |
|        |                                                    |        |  |

 

----
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 280

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV

No. CR-14-779

BRANDON LAMONT HOUSE

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered April 29, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE CLARK

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NOS. CR-2010-202; CR-2012-09]

HONORABLE ROBERT E.

MCCALLUM, JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO

WITHDRAW GRANTED

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge

Appellant Brandon House pled guilty in CR-2010-202 to two counts of commercial

burglary and one count of felony theft of property and was sentenced to five years’ probation

in June 2011. Approximately one year later, House pled guilty in CR-2012-09 to two counts

of second-degree forgery and received six years’ probation. His probation in both cases was

revoked in May 2014 after the circuit court found that he had committed several violations

of his probation. The court sentenced him to forty years’ imprisonment in the Arkansas

Department of Correction in CR-2010-202 and ten years’ suspended imposition of sentence

in CR-2012-09. House timely filed an appeal of his revocations. 

On appeal, appellate counsel has filed a motion with this court to be relieved as counsel

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-

3(k) (2012). The motion is accompanied by an abstract and addendum of the proceedings
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 280

below. Counsel has also filed a no-merit brief, asserting that there is nothing in the record

that would support an appeal. House has filed pro se statements of points for reversal, and the

State has filed a response thereto. 

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error but

rather would an appeal be wholly frivolous. Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904

(1994). Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders, we find that

there has been compliance with Rule 4-3(k), and after consideration of House’s pro se points

for reversal,1 we hold that House’s appeal is wholly without merit. 

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

VIRDEN and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

Crawford Law Firm, by Brandon Crawford, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Jake H. Jones, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

1

 We note that the majority of House’s arguments in his pro se points, including his

ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, were not raised below or were not otherwise

preserved for our review. Issues raised for the first time on appeal, even constitutional issues,

will not be considered because the circuit court never had an opportunity to make a ruling.

Johnson v. State, 2009 Ark. 460 (per curiam) (citing Green v. State, 362 Ark. 459, 209 S.W.3d

339 (2005)).

2
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Synova Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  April 5, 2006                           /s/ Stephen E. King
       ----------------------------            ---------------------------------
                                               Stephen E. King
                                               Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 2 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 3 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 4 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 5 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 6 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 7 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 8 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 9 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 10 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 11 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 12 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 13 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 14 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 15 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 16 of 17
Case 4:18-cv-00051-RM-DTF Document 12 Filed 04/12/18 Page 17 of 17
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroGrow International Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jervis B. Perkins,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by this Report.




Date:
      November 19, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Jervis B. PerkinsJervis
      B. PerkinsChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
Order filed July 26, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00588

- CV

____________ JEFFREY MAY, ET AL , Appellants

V.
TICOR TITLE INSURANC E, N/K/A CHICAGO TITLE, COMMONWEALTH

LAND TITLE INSURANCE , LAWYERS TITLE INSU RANCE CORPORATION, AND ALA MO TITLE INSURANCE C OMPANY , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 50072

- 367



### ORDER

Plaintiffs below, Jeffrey May, et al, ("May"), filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's judgment signed March 6, 2012. Defendants, Ticor Title Insurance, n/k/a Chicago Title, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, a nd Alamo Title Insurance Company , ("Ticor"), subsequently filed a notice of cross

- appeal.No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter for the

Court informed this court that May had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On July 6, 2012, the clerk of this court notified May that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter = s record unless May , within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the rec ord. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). May filed no reply.
Accordingly, we order May to file a brief in this appeal on or before August 27, 2012

. If May fail to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal brought by May for want of prosecution

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Xianping Wang, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Xinhua China LTD., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xinhua China LTD. for the period ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Xinhua China LTD.





Date: December 4, 2012


/s/ "Xianping Wang"Xianping Wang

President, Chief Executive Officer







/s/ "Xianping Wang"Xianping Wang

Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Xinhua China LTD. and will be retained by Xinhua China LTD. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
10.16




Administrative
Services Agreement


Amendment
No. 1





This
Amendment dated March 5, 2008 to the Administrative Services Agreement (the
“Agreement”) originally dated August 1, 2004 by and between iVoice, Inc., a New
Jersey corporation (“iVoice”) and SpeechSwitch, Inc., a New Jersey corporation
(the “Company”).


WHEREAS, the parties have
agreed to amend this Agreement.





NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing premises and the respective promises and
agreements of the parties set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as
follows:





1.
            Effective
      on September 1, 2005, the Services Fee shall be revised to equal Four
      Thousand and Two Hundred and Twenty Dollars and Ninety-six Cents
      ($4,220.96).


2.
            The
      Services Fees as defined in Section 3 of this Agreement and that are
      earned, accrued and remain unpaid shall be aggregated and converted into a
      Convertible Promissory Note in substantially the form as set forth in
      Exhibit A herein.


3.
            All
      other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of date written
below:








iVoice,
Inc.                                                                                     SpeechSwitch,
Inc.





By:___________________                                                      By:___________________


Jerome
Mahoney                                                               
Bruce Knef


President
and                                                                       President
and


Chief Executive
Officer                                                       Chief
Executive Officer
Exhibit A in support of Defendants’ Supplement to Memorandum Re: 

Confidential Designation of Deposition Transcripts and Videotapes

And 

Motion for Protective Order and Order to Cease/Desist and Remove Public 

Postings

FILED UNDER SEAL

Case 2:17-cv-04565-SMB Document 179-1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Synova Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2005 (the "Report") that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  November 14, 2005                     /s/ Robert Edwards
       -------------------                   -----------------------------------
                                             Robert Edwards
                                             Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
***Exhibit 32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-K of Montana Mining Corp. for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: April 9, 2008

 

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25