alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         468
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         50
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               50
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    2,283
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         24
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           23
<LOANS>                                        21,871
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (227)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,436
<DEPOSITS>                                     21,923
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            203
<LONG-TERM>                                    1,367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          16
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 25,436
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1,823
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              157
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,980
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             (1,047)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,157)
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          823
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (49)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                42
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     42
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   34
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.59
<LOANS-NON>                                    99
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                149
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               191
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (13)
<RECOVERIES>                                   1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              227
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        227



</TABLE>
#### David M. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 46786.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 23, 1993.

Laura G. Martin, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Saleeby, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from dismissal of post-conviction motion under Rule 24.035 for untimely filing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13898]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-00437; FRL-5373-2]


State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) Working 
Committee on Water Quality & Pesticide Disposal; Open Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) 
Working Committee on Water Quality & Pesticide Disposal will hold a 2-
day meeting, beginning on Monday, June 3, 1996 and ending on Tuesday, 
June 4, 1996. This notice announces the location and times for the 
meeting and sets forth tentative agenda topics. The meetings are open 
to the public.

DATES: The SFIREG Working Committee on Water Quality & Pesticide 
Disposal will meet on Monday, June 3, 1996, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
and Tuesday, June 4, 1996 from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the DoubleTree Hotel, 300 Army-
Navy Drive, Crystal City-Arlington, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Shirley M. Howard, Office of 
Pesticide Programs (7506C), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., 
SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 
1100, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, 
(703) 305-5306, (703) 308-3259 (fax). E:mail address: 
H<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89e6fee8fbeda7fae1e0fbe5ecf0e4c9ecf9e8e4e8e0e5a7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="533c243221377d203b3a213f362a3e133623323e323a3f7d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The tentative agenda of the SFIREG Working 
Committee on Water Quality & Pesticide Disposal includes the following:

    1.  Summary of outcomes of the state management plan 
teleconferences.
    2.  Discussion of groundwater monitoring data sources.
    3.  Presentation on source water protection.
    4.  Update on the 1996 PREP program and course outline.
    5.  Discussion of SFIREG issue papers and committee reports.
    6.  Status reports on Acetochlor and Triazine registrations.
    7.  Status of the restricted-use rule.
    8.  Update on fiscal year 1996-1997 grant funding and discussion of 
performance partnerships grant implications for water programs.
    9.  Update on proposed national conference on state management 
plans.
    10.  Other topics as appropriate.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection.

    Dated: May 23, 1996.

William L. Jordan,
Director, Field Operations Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 96-13898 Filed 5-30-96; 1:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

l0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

137719 (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137719 COA: 288097 Calhoun CC: 00-023332-FC PATRICK G. MCNAMEE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court's April 28, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14487]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force


Community College of the Air Force Meeting

    The Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) Board of Visitors 
will hold a meeting on June 28, 1996 at 8:30 a.m. at the Air Education 
and Training Command Conference Room, Building 905, Randolph Air Force 
Base, Texas. The meeting will be open to the public.
    The purpose of the meeting is review and discuss academic policies 
and issues relative to the operation of the CCAF. Agenda items include 
a review of the operations of the CCAF, reaffirmation of accreditation 
by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on 
Colleges, update on the activities of the CCAF Policy Council, and 
election of new officers.
    Members of the public who wish to make oral or written statements 
at the meeting should contact Captain Kyle C. Monson, Designated 
Federal Officer for the Board, at the address below no later than 4:00 
p.m. on June 10, 1996. The request may be made by mail or electronic 
mail. Telephone requests will not be honored. The request should 
identify the name of the individual who will make the presentation and 
an outline of the issues to be addressed. At least 35 copies of the 
presentation must be given to Captain Monson no later than the time of 
the meeting for distribution to the board and interested members of the 
public. Visual aids must be submitted to Captain Monson on 3\1/2\ inch 
computer disk in Microsoft Powerpoint 4.0 format no later than 4:00 on 
June 10, 1996 to allow sufficient time for virus scanning and 
formatting of the slides.
    For further information, contact Captain Kyle Monson, (334) 953-
2703, Community College of the Air Force, Maxwell Air Force Base, 
Alabama 36112-6613, or through electronic mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#701b1d1f1e031f1e30131311165e11055e11165e1d191c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="771c1a18190418193714141611591602591611591a1e1b">[email protected]</span></a>.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-14487 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Andrea CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20514.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.

Oct. 21, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 6, 1996.

Daniel L. Viets, H. Mark Preyer, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joanne E. Joiner, Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty and was convicted on charges of drug trafficking in the second degree, punishable by a minimum of five years to a maximum of fifteen years in prison. The trial judge entered a sentence of six and one-half years in prison and deniéd Appellant’s request for probation.

Appellant’s only point is as follows:

> The trial court erred in denying appellant’s request for probation because such denial constituted an extreme abuse of discretion in that appellant had no prior criminal record, was convinced by her husband to assist in the illegal activity, fully cooperated with officials by consenting to the search of the vehicle, and has a three year old child to care for.

*329Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that there cannot be appellate review of a denial of probation. In response, Defendant cites several cases for the contention that this court may reverse a denial of probation for extreme abuse of discretion. *State v. Magouirk,*890 S.W.2d 17, 18 (Mo.App.1994); *State v. Priesmeyer,*719 S.W.2d 873, 876 (Mo.App.1986); *State v. Keller,*685 S.W.2d 605, 606 (Mo.App.1985); *State v. Austin,*620 S.W.2d 42, 43 (Mo.App.1981). In none of these cases did the defendant attempt to appeal after entering a guilty plea.1

A defendant may appeal from the judgment and sentence entered upon a guilty plea; however the scope of review on such an appeal is restricted to the question of the jurisdiction of the subject matter and the sufficiency of the criminal charge. *Gougler v. State,*859 S.W.2d 257, 259, n. 3 (Mo.App.1993); *Tygart v. State,*752 S.W.2d 362, 365 (Mo.App.1988); *State v. LePage,*536 S.W.2d 834, 835 (Mo.App.1976). The scope of appellate review on direct appeal from a guilty plea does not encompass review of a refusal to grant probation. *State v. Simmons,*660 S.W.2d 319, 321 (Mo.App.1983)(citing, but not exclusively relying on, *Benson;*see note 1 supra).

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is sustained. The appeal is dismissed.

1

. Respondent argues that, even absent her guilty plea, Appellant could not appeal the denial of probation, citing *State*v. *Williams,*871 S.W.2d 450, 452 (Mo. banc 1994). *See also State v. Ledbetter,*907 S.W.2d 805, 806 (Mo.App.1995)(citing *Williams).*The court in *Williams*concluded that "there is no right to appeal a trial judge’s decision to grant or deny probation,” citing *Benson v. State,*504 S.W.2d 74, 76 (Mo.1974), which apparently relied on a statute that has since been repealed. *See State*v. *Wood,*668 S.W.2d 172, 174 n. 2 (Mo.App.1984)(allowing limited review of orders denying probation after noting authority for the rule in *Benson*vanished with repeal of the statute).
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**UNDER
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Aerogrow International Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Mitchell B. Rubin, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of
      and for the period covered by this Report.





Date:  August
                14, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Mitchell B. RubinMitchell
                B. RubinChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Meenoo Chahbazi (No. 029568) 

ROBAINA & KRESIN PLLC 

5343 N. 16th Street, Suite 200 

Phoenix, Arizona 85016 

Telephone: (602) 682-6450 

Facsimile: (602) 682-6455 

mch@robainalaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Vinita Bhatt 

Mark Brnovich 

Attorney General 

Michael K. Goodwin, Bar No. 014446 

Assistant Attorney General 

2005 N. Central Avenue 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-1592 

Telephone: (602) 542-7674 

Facsimile: (602) 542-7644 

Michael.Goodwin@azag.gov 

EmploymentLaw@azag.gov 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Vinita Bhatt, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

State of Arizona, David Dunaway, and 

Daniel Czecholinski, 

 Defendants. 

Case No: CV-17-04807-PHX-JZB 

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff and 

Defendants hereby stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice, the 

parties to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. A proposed order accompanies this 

motion. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:17-cv-04807-JZB Document 45 Filed 11/06/18 Page 1 of 2
 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of November, 2018. 

ROBAINA & KRESIN PLLC Mark Brnovich 

 Attorney General 

By /s/ Meenoo Chahbazi /s/ Michael K. Goodwin (w/permission) 

 Meenoo Chahbazi Michael K. Goodwin 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Vinita Bhatt Assistant Attorney General 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk’s 

Office using the CM/ECF System for filing, which generates a Notice of Filing to the 

following CM/ECF registrant on this 6th day of November 2018: 

Meenoo Chahbazi 

Robaina & Kresin PLLC 

5343 North 16th Street, Suite 200 

Phoenix, Arizona 85016 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ Gaynell Carpenter 

Case 2:17-cv-04807-JZB Document 45 Filed 11/06/18 Page 2 of 2
1 WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

1 O United States of America, No. CR-'18-08008-001-PCT-GMS 

11 Plaintiff, ORDER 

12 v. 

13 Randy Thomas Stewart, 

14 Defendant. 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3141 et. seq. a 

detention hearing was held. The defendant is ordered detained pending an intake 

assessment for placement at Crossroads. in Phoenix, Arizona or other facility as 

designated by Pretrial Services. Should defendant qualify for such placement, defendant 

shall be released upon conditions set by this Court, including pretrial residency at said 

facility, as conditions do exist which would reasonably assure the safety of others and the 

appearance of the defendant. Should defendant not so qualify, the release conditions set 

by this Court shall be vacated and defendant shall be detained pending trial as there are 

no conditions or combination of conditions which would reasonably assure the safety of 

others or the appearance of the defendant. 

The Pretrial Services Officer is ordered to timely notify this Court of the 

defendant's intake assessment results, and if found acceptable, the date and time the 

II 
1 facility will provide transportation from the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse for the . 

2 defendant. 

3 Dated this 26th day of January, 2018. 

;;+· 4 

,..,,·-~ ·: ;,/ . 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

j?i·' 22 

_)F1 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 -
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00071-JJT Document 34 Filed 05/21/18 Page 9 of 9
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Volcan Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pnina Feldman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |     |                                                                    
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
November 19, 2008 | By: | /s/ PNINA FELDMAN                                                  
|                        |     | Pnina Feldman                                                      
|                        |     | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13317]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Plan for the Child Care and Development Block Grant.
    OMB No.: 0970-0114.
    Description: This legislatively-mandated plan serves as the 
agreement between the grantee and the Federal Government as to how 
CCDBG programs will be operated. The plans provide assurances that the 
funds will be administered in conformance with the legislative 
requirements, pertinent Federal Regulations, and other applicable 
instructions or guidelines issued by ACF.
    Respondents: State governments.
    Annual Burden Estimates:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of    Average burden                
                   Instrument                        Number of     responses per     hours per     Total burden 
                                                    respondents     respondent       response          hours    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACF-700.........................................             282               1              40          11,280
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 11,280.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
Roberta Katson,
Director, Office of Information Resource Management Services.
[FR Doc. 96-13317 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M