alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13805]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Parts 45 and 52


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Government Property

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next public meetings of the Government Property Rewrite 
Team are scheduled for June 19 and 20, 1996 (and might continue on June 
21, 1996, if necessary). Discussion will focus on a draft revision of 
FAR Part 45--Government Property and associated contract clauses.

DATES: Public Meetings: The public meetings will be conducted at the 
address shown below from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., local time, on June 
19, 20, and, if necessary, June 21, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Public Meetings: The public meetings will be held in the 4th 
floor conference room, VSE Corporation, 2550 Huntington Ave., 
Alexandra, VA 22303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Angelena Moy, by telephone at 
(703) 695-1097/1098, or by FAX at (703) 695-7596.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Draft Materials

    Drafts of the materials to be discussed at the public meetings are 
available electronically in Microsoft Word 6.0 and ASCII text formats 
at the Major Policy Initiatives Internet Office Home Page--<a href="http://
www.acq.osd.mil/dp/mpi/
">http://
www.acq.osd.mil/dp/mpi/
</a> Obtain paper copies from Ms. Angelena Moy, PDUSD (A&T) DP/MPI, Room 
3C128, The Pentagon, Washington DC 20301-3060.

Background

    The Director, Defense Procurement, is leading an Inter-Agency team 
that is considering revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation 
(FAR) Part 45, Government Property, which will reduce administrative 
burdens imposed by Part 45 on contractors and government personnel and 
improve government property management and disposal business processes. 
The Director, Defense Procurement, is providing a forum for an exchange 
of ideas and information with government and industry personnel by 
holding public meetings, soliciting public comments, and publishing 
notices of the public meetings in the Federal Register. The June 1996 
public meetings are intended to obtain comments or suggestions 
regarding the current draft FAR Part 45 which includes new and revised 
material recommended by public and government sources during and 
subsequent to the November 1995 public meetings.
Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulation Council.
[FR Doc. 96-13805 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### James E. BOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42215.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 13, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 24, 1990.

Larry C. Pace, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 692 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Tay-Sachs Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2009 

Mr. ARCURI (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. 

LOWEY, and Mr. CARDOZA) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Tay-Sachs Awareness 

Month. 

Whereas Tay-Sachs disease is a rare, genetic disorder that 

causes destruction of nerve cells in the brain and spinal 

cord due to the poor functioning of an enzyme called 

beta-hexosaminidase A; 

Whereas there is no proven treatment or cure for Tay-Sachs 

disease, which is always fatal in children; 

Whereas the disorder was named after Warren Tay, an ophthalmologist from the United Kingdom, and Bernard 

Sachs, a neurologist from the United States, both of 

whom contributed to the discovery of the disease in 1881 

and 1887, respectively; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 692 IH 

Whereas Tay-Sachs disease often affects families with no 

prior history of the disease; 

Whereas approximately 1 in 27 Ashkenazi Jews, 1 in 30 

Louisianan Cajuns, 1 in 30 French Canadians, 1 in 50 

Irish Americans, and 1 in every 250 people are carriers 

of Tay-Sachs disease; 

Whereas approximately 1,200,000 Americans are carriers of 

Tay-Sachs disease; 

Whereas these unaffected carriers of the disease possess the 

recessive gene that can trigger the disease in future generations; 

Whereas if both parents of a child are carriers of Tay-Sachs 

disease, there is a 1 in 4 chance that the child will develop Tay-Sachs disease; 

Whereas a simple and inexpensive blood test can determine 

if an individual is a carrier of Tay-Sachs disease, and all 

people in the United States, especially those citizens who 

are members of high-risk populations, should be screened; 

and 

Whereas heightened awareness and increased research are the 

best ways to eradicate this horrific disease: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of Tay-Sachs Awareness Month and 

3 encourages and supports education and research efforts 

4 with respect to Tay-Sachs disease. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit D

Case 2:17-cv-04565-SMB Document 179-4 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 4
ase 2:17-cv-04565-SMB Document 179-4 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 
ase 2:17-cv-04565-SMB Document 179-4 Filed 05/29/20 Page 3 of 
ase 2:17-cv-04565-SMB Document 179-4 Filed 05/29/20 Page 4 of
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge: 

 

 (a)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 (b)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: June 30, 2008

 

/s/  Kevin R. Hoben______________________

 

Kevin R. Hoben

Chief Executive Officer 

 

/s/  Paul J. Kane_________________________

 

Paul J. Kane

Chief Financial Officer 

 

 

This certification is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Manuel Ceballos Padilla, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Enrique M. Lucero, et al. 

Respondents.

No. CV-18-0121-PHX-SRB (BSB)

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2241 on January 12, 2018 asserting six grounds for relief. On screening the Court 

dismissed Grounds One and Two and ordered Respondent to answer Grounds Three 

through Six. (Doc. 6) Respondent Enrique Lucero filed his Response to the Petition for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus on February 20, 2018 and Petitioner filed a Reply on March 13, 

2018. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Motion for Immediate Release (Doc. 13) 

and Motion for Stay of Removal Pending Consideration of Petition for a Writ of Habeas 

Corpus (Doc. 19). 

 On April 11, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation 

recommending that Petitioner’s Motion for Immediate Release and Motion for Stay of 

Removal be denied. 

 In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time 

to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

have been filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petitioner’s Motion for Immediate 

Release and Motion for Stay of Removal. (Docs. 13 and 19) 

 Dated this 9th day of May, 2018.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JASON SCOTT,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00110-CR

Appeal from the

432nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1314945R) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with 

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroGrow International, Inc.  (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jervis B. 
Perkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by this Report.





Date: November
      6, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Jervis B. 
      PerkinsJervis
      B.  PerkinsChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
| (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

|                         |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Robert Gehorsam     |   |   |
| Robert      Gehorsam         |   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |   |
| Image      Metrics Inc.      |   |   |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Theiss Faison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                           
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|March 27, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Margaret Theiss Faison
|               |  |  |  | Margaret Theiss Faison    
|               |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ROBIN JEAN HARRIS, 

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

Respondent

______________________

2024-1943

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-1221-22-0150-W-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee 

required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the

required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is 

Case: 24-1943 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2024
2 HARRIS V. DVA

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

July 5, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 5, 2024

Case: 24-1943 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 07/05/2024
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the report of Fuqi International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Yu
      Kwai ChongYu
      Kwai ChongChairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
      6, 2009





/s/ Ching
      Wan WongChing
      Wan WongChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      6, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fuqi International, Inc. and will be retained by Fuqi International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         YEAR            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997     DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                 377             930 
<SECURITIES>                                             0               0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                          672             406 
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (122)            (32) 
<INVENTORY>                                              0               0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,503           2,010 
<PP&E>                                              38,029          37,231 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (5,147)         (4,002) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      35,704          36,270 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,161           1,570 
<BONDS>                                             25,954          24,943 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0               0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0               0 
<COMMON>                                             6,864           6,756 
<OTHER-SE>                                            (124)          1,578 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        35,704          36,270 
<SALES>                                                  0               0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,107           4,217  
<CGS>                                                    0               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,680           3,885 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       322             (58) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0               0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,249           1,676 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,144)         (1,286) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                           774             453 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,369)           (833) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0               0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0               0  
<CHANGES>                                                0               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,369)           (833)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.16)          (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.16)          (0.10)
        


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.55
 
     Capitalized Terms.
 Term of Agreement
 Initial Term
 Renewal




---



##### 



Employment
 Salary
 Employee Benefits
 Business Expenses
 Business Expenses
 Termination of Employment
 Definitions
 Cause
 Disability
 Termination upon Death or Disability
  
 2




---



##### 



Termination for other than Death or Disability or for Cause less
  Voluntary Termination by Employee or Termination for Cause
   Confidentiality and Non-Competition
 Definitions
   
 3




---



##### 



Covenant Not-To-Disclose
     
 4




---



##### 



Covenant of Non-Disparagement and Cooperation
 Remedies
  
 5




---



##### 



Severability
 Ownership of Property
 No Defense
 Indemnification
 Company Obligations
 Notice and Defense of Claim
  
 6




---



##### 



Survival
 Dispute Resolution
 Agreement to Arbitrate
 Procedure
  
 7




---



##### 



Rights of Parties
 Employee Acknowledgment
 Amendments
 Successors
 Assignment
  
 8




---



##### 



Waiver
 Severability
 Survival
 Entire Terms
 Notices
  
  
    
 9




---



##### 



Headings
 Governing Laws
  COMPANY:
AFC ENTERPRISES, INC.By:
    /s/ Frank J. BelattiFrank J. BelattiChairman of the BoardEMPLOYEE:By:
    /s/ Frederick B. Beilstein IIIFrederick B. Beilstein III  
 10
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 20

- BG

- 499

IN RE HAROLD L. BOYD, III 20 20 D DN 11 2

A Suspended Member of the Bar of the

Distri ct of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg istration No. 4 81736

BEFORE: Glickman and Deahl , Associate Judge s , and Steadman, Senior Judge

.

O R D E R

(FILED

— October 1, 2020)

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s

petition for reinstatement wherein Disciplinary Counsel informs the court that M r

. B oyd has demonstrated that h e is fit to resume the practice of law

, and it appearing

that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see

, In re B oyd , 75

A.3d 913 (D.C. 201 3 ) , it is

ORDERED that petitioner ’s petition for reinstatement is granted and Harold

L. Boyd, III, is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia

.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp. II (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Michael Kaswan, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                              |  |  |  |  |  |                         
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Kaswan                           |  |  |  |  |  | Dated: November 14, 2006
|    |  | Michael Kaswan                               |  |  |  |  |  |                         
|    |  | Chief Operating Officer                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         
|    |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |  |  |  |  |  |
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney 

ANNA WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

State Bar No.: 029708 

405 West Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, Arizona 85701-5040 

Telephone: (520) 620-7300 

E-mail: anna.wright@usdoj.gov 

 nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

 Defendant.

CR-18-00223-RCC (DTF) 

NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE 

DEFENDANT’S CONFESSIONS, 

ADMISSIONS AND STATEMENTS 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.1

 The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby 

gives notice, pursuant to Rule 16.1 of the Local Rules of Criminal Practice of the United 

States District Court for the District of Arizona, that all confessions, admissions and 

statements provided in the government’s disclosure will be introduced into evidence by the 

government at the trial in this matter. See United States v. Hall, 742 F.2d 1153, 1156 (9th 

Cir. 1984); United States v. Long, 455 F.2d 962, 963 (9th Cir. 1972). 

/// 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Respectfully submitted this 13th day of May, 2019. 

 

 MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney 

District of Arizona 

 /s/ Anna R. Wright & Nathaniel J. Walters

 ANNA WRIGHT &

 NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

 Assistant U.S. Attorneys 

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by 

other means this 13th day of May, 2019, to: 

All ECF participants