U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr: Stuttgart, AR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stuttgart, Arkansas Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summary

Research Project: The Role of Mucosal Surfaces and Microflora in Immunity and Disease Prevention Location:
                                Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr Title:   Author  item
                                            Straus, David

                                                         - *Dave*item
                                            Beck, Benjamin
  Submitted to: Aquaculture America
                                    Publication Type: Proceedings
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 12/14/2015
                                    Publication  Date: 2/22/2016
                                    Citation: Straus, D.L., Beck, B.H. 2016. Treating catfish diseases: walking the line between excess and moderation. Proceedings of the Aquaculture America 2016, February 22-26, Las Vegas, Neveda 2016. p. 83.Interpretive Summary:
                                Technical Abstract: Cost savings by using a cheaper disease treatment will increase profitability of any catfish farm.  This invited producer presentation will discuss costs savings using copper sulfate in catfish production and a summation of our research, specifically in the hatchery.  Copper sulfate is not approved by the FDA for use on food fish.  But, regulatory action has been deferred pending ongoing research; so it is currently acceptable to use.  The only FDA-approved compounds for fungus control are formalin and hydrogen peroxide; these are very expensive and have human safety concerns/storage precautions (formalin - carcinogen, severe skin and respiratory irritant, flammable, hydrogen peroxide - severe skin and respiratory irritant, corrosive).
A comparison of costs for fungus control of one treatment of a catfish trough is as follows:
Hydrogen Peroxide (approved) - $0.89
Formalin (approved) - $0.73
Copper Sulfate - $0.02
A range-finding study was designed to determine the optimum concentration of copper sulfate needed to control fungus (Saprolegnia sp.) on channel catfish eggs in 23 deg C well water at the Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center.  Channel catfish were spawned on-site and spawns were moved to the hatching lab within 24 hrs.  Similar portions (approximately 80 g) of a spawn were placed into mesh baskets of individual compartments of a custom hatching trough (n=4) and acclimated for 1 hr.  Egg counts (eggs/approximately 10 g sample) were also determined for each spawn to estimate number of eggs in each portion.  The study consisted of 5 copper sulfate concentrations (2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/L) and an untreated control.  Eggs were treated daily until the embryos developed eyes (after 5 treatments).  Water chemistry for the well water was pH 7.5, 220 mg/L total alkalinity, and 90 mg/L total hardness.  When hatching was complete for all viable eggs, fry were siphoned into individual jars containing 70% ethanol and counted within a few days to determine the percent of fry that hatched in each treatment.  Fungus was severe in the untreated controls (2% survival) and an optimum treatment of 10 mg/L CuSO4 daily was sufficient to control fungus (63% survival) in 23.5 deg C well water.  Very little fungus was present in treatments receiving 10 mg/L CuSO4 or higher (Table 1), except in 1 replication (1 spawn) that had numerous unfertilized eggs.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov