alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JOSE PAR

R A-TEJEDA, a .k.a . Jose Parra Te ja da , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-30134

D.C . No. 2:14-c r-00112-TOR
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of W a shington Thom a s O. Ric e , C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Jose Parra -Te

je da a ppe a ls from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 3 3-m o nth se nte nc e im p ose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a

n 

# FIL ED JUN 20 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a lie n in theUnite d Stat e s a fte r de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm
. Parra -Te je da c o nte n ds tha

t his se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble in light of the

m itiga ting fa c tors a

nd the 12-le ve l e nha

nc e m e nt he re c e ive d unde r U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Thedistric t c ourt did not a b use its disc re tion in im posing Pa rra -Te j e da ’ s se nte nc e . Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The within-Guide line s se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) se nte n c ing fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c irc um sta

nc e s , inc l uding Pa

rra -Te je da ’ s c rim ina l history

and his fa ilure to be de te rre d by a prior 33-m onth se nte nc e for the sa m e offe nse . Se eGall , 552 U.S. a t 51; s e ealso United State s v . Ruiz-C

haire z , 493 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th C ir. 2007) (re j e c ting e m

piric a l
c ha lle nge to se c tion 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)). M ore o ve r, c ontra ry to Pa rra -Te je da ’ s c onte ntion, there c ord re fle c ts tha t the distric t c ourt c onside re d his a rgum e nts for a lowe r se nte nc e . Se eUnite d State s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba nc ). AFFIRM E D.

1 5
- 3 0 1 3 4 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14287]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,896, etc.]


Phillips Petroleum Company Exploration and Production Group (dba 
Exploration Division and North American Production Division) (Including 
General Counsel); Bartlesville, Oklahoma and All Other Locations in 
Oklahoma and All Locations in the Following States: Kansas, Arkansas, 
Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, California, Alabama, Alaska; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 3, 1995, applicable to 
all workers of Phillips Petroleum Company, Exploration and Production 
Group, dba Exploration Division and North American Production Division, 
Bartlesville, Oklahoma, all other Oklahoma locations, and other 
locations in various States. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on May 17, 1995 (60 FR 26459).
    At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. General Counsel 
employees of the subject firm were not explicitly cited in the 
certification. However, new findings show that General Counsel 
employees of the subject firm did support the exploration and 
production of crude oil and natural gas.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Phillips Petroleum adversely affected by imports of crude 
oil and natural gas. Accordingly, the Department is amending the worker 
certification to specifically provide coverage to General Counsel 
employees of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,896 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Phillips Petroleum Company, Exploration and 
Production Group, dba Exploration Division and North American 
Production Division, Including General Counsel, Bartlesville, 
Oklahoma (TA-W-30,896), all other locations in Oklahoma (TA-W-
30,896A), and all locations in the following States: Kansas (TA-W-
30,896B), Arkansas (TA-W-30,896C), Texas (TA-W-30,896D), Louisiana 
(TA-W-30,896E), New Mexico (TA-W-30,896F), California (TA-W-
30,896G), Alabama (TA-W-30,896H), and Alaska (TA-W-30,896I) who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
March 23, 1994, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 23rd day of May 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-14287 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
H. Res. 651 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 16, 2009. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and she 

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR: Ms. Chu. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### McCULLOCH PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHOENEWEIS TOOL & DIE CO., INC., Defendant-Respondent.

No. 56840.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

April 10, 1990.

Michael S. Wright, Warrenton, for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard Greenberg, Clayton, for defendant-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

McCulloch Products, Inc. appeals from a judgment of $10,759.50 entered against it on May 17, 1989, based on a counterclaim filed by Schoeneweis Tool & Die Co., Inc., for damages for breach of contract and breach of warranty arising out of the manufacture and sale to Schoeneweis of defective “spool pulleys” used in the textile industry.

We affirm. There was substantial evidence to support the judgment of the trial court and the judgment was not against the weight of the evidence. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13662]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5511-8]


Meeting of the Small Town Task Force

    On June 17, 1996 the Small Town Environmental Planning Task Force 
(STTF) will conduct its sixth meeting. The purpose of the meeting is to 
discuss the recommendations made in their final report to be presented 
to the Administrator of EPA. The Task Force will also discuss its 
future role, purpose and structure.
    The Task Force was charged with identifying regulations developed 
pursuant to Federal environmental laws which pose significant 
compliance problems for small towns; identifying the means to improve 
the working relationship between the Environmental Protection Agency 
and small towns; reviewing proposed regulations for the protection of 
environmental and public health and suggesting revisions that could 
improve the ability of small towns to comply with such regulations; and 
identifying the means to promoting regionalization of environmental 
treatment systems and infrastructure serving small towns to improve the 
economic conditions of such systems and infrastructure. Their Final 
Report provides recommendations on these topics for consideration by 
EPA's Administrator.
    The meeting will be held at the Dupont Plaza Hotel, located at 1500 
New Hampshire Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036. The meeting will begin 
at 8:30 a.m. on June 17th and conclude at 5:00 p.m.
    The Designated Federal Officer (DFO) for this subcommittee is 
Christine Zawlocki. She is the point of contact for information 
concerning any subcommittee matters and can be reached by calling (202) 
260-0244 or by writing to: U.S. EPA, 401 M Street, SW. (1502), 
Washington, DC 20460.
    This is an open meeting and all interested persons are invited to 
attend. Meeting minutes will be available within forty-five days after 
the meeting and con be obtained by written request from the DFO. 
Members of the public are requested to call the DFO at the above number 
if planning to attend so the arrangements can be made to comfortably 
accommodate attendees as much as possible.
Christine Zawlocki,
Designated Federal Official, Office of Regional Operations and State/
Local Relations.
[FR Doc. 96-13662 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28860-28861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14248]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1915-000]


Connecticut Light and Power Company; Notice of Filing

May 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 24, 1996, Connecticut Light and Power 
Company (CL&P) filed a proposed limited-term rate schedule under which 
CL&P would purchase capacity and associated energy from certain 
customer-owned generation during a specified three and one-half

[[Page 28861]]

month period this summer. CL&P's filing is in response to a potential 
emergency situation due to the shutdown of certain generating plants in 
Connecticut. CL&P believes that the proposed rate schedule will permit 
it to utilize available generating capacity to address an urgent need 
for generating capacity to meet its customers' power needs and to help 
avoid service curtailments during peak load periods this summer.
    The capacity provided by potential sellers under this rate schedule 
would be available to CL&P at its request for up to ten continuous 
hours per request during the three and one-half month period from June 
1, 1996 through September 15, 1996. CL&P would purchase up to an 
aggregate of 100 megawatts of electric capacity and associated energy 
from certain independent power producers. Potential sellers under the 
rate schedule are industrial and commercial customers that may have, or 
may locate, electric generating equipment on site. The proposed rate 
schedule would not be available to utilities or to qualifying 
facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 
that regularly sell their capacity and energy to CL&P or to another 
Connecticut utility. Sellers would sign agreements to sell such 
capacity and associated energy during the specified period.
    By expedited order issued this date, the Commission accepted CL&P's 
proposed limited-term rate schedule for filing, to become effective 
June 1, 1996, but subject to possible prospective revision after 
Commission review of comments, if any, filed in response to this 
notice.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest CL&P's filing should 
file comments, a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before June 14, 1996. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of CL&P's filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14248 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1436]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-AWP-32]


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Lovelock, NV; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects certain geographic coordinates that were 
inadvertently inserted in the final rule that was published in the 
Federal Register on January 3, 1996, Airspace Docket No. 95-AWP-32. The 
final rule amends Class E airspace at Lovelock, NV.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC February 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Speer, Airspace Specialist, System Management Branch, AWP-530, 
Air Traffic Division, Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261, 
telephone (310) 725-6533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    Federal Register Document 96-58, Airspace Docket No. 95-AWP-32, 
published on January 3, 1996 (61 FR 121), revised the description of 
the Class E airspace area at Lovelock, NV. An error was made by 
duplicating the geographic coordinates for a portion of the airspace 
description for the Lovelock, NV, Class E airspace area. This action 
corrects that error.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
geographic coordinates in a portion of the airspace description for the 
Class E airspace area at Lovelock, NV, as published in the Federal 
Register on January 3, 1996 (61 FR 121), (Federal Register Document 96-
58), are corrected as follows:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

AWP NV E5 Lovelock, NV [Corrected]

    On page 122, column 2, the geographic coordinates for the Class 
E airspace at Lovelock, NV are corrected by removing ``(and that 
airspace bounded by a line beginning at lat. 40 deg.23'00'' N, long. 
118 deg.29'00'' W; to lat. 40 deg.32'00'' N, long. 118 deg.14'00'' 
W; to lat. 40 deg.22'00'' N, long. 118 deg.14'00'' W; to lat. 
40 deg.18'00'' N, long. 118 deg.23'00'' W, thence to the point of 
beginning.).''

    Issued in Los Angeles, California, on January 12, 1996.
James H. Snow,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 96-1436 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29415-29416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14573]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a list of information collection 
requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call 
the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 443-0525.
    FY 1997/1998 Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant 
Application Format--Revision of a currently approved collection--The 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300x 1-9) authorizes block grants 
to States for the purpose of providing prevention and treatment 
services.

[[Page 29416]]

Under the provisions of the law, States may receive allotments only 
after an application is approved by the Secretary, DHHS. The uniform 
application format provides States with the forms and instructions for 
their applications so they can comply with the requirements of the law 
and regulations implementing the law. The annual burden estimate is 
shown below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     No. of                                             
     No. of       responses per    Avg. burden per       Total annual   
  respondents      respondent          response             burden      
------------------------------------------------------------------------
60                            1  561.5 hours........  33,690 hours.     
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: 
Virginia Huth, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management 
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10236, Washington, DC 
20503.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
Patricia S. Bransford,
Acting Executive Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-14573 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2018

t1226 

# Order

Clerk December 27, 2018

157492

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157492

COA: 327796

Macomb CC: 2014

- 001163

- FC

JOHN BUTSINAS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
H. Res. 457 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 20, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2352) to amend the Small Business Act, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Small Business. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 

Small Business now printed in the bill. The committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
2 

•HRES 457 EH 

as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those 

arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 

11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except 

those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
3 

•HRES 457 EH 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gary D. Tollefson, M.D., Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2008



/s/ Gary D. TollefsonGary D. Tollefson, M.D., Ph.D.President and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.