alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 650 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 8, 2009. 

Whereas country music was created in the United States and 

its distinctive sound makes it a uniquely American institution; 

Whereas country music is rooted in the folk traditions of the 

British Isles; 

Whereas in the United States, those roots became entangled 

with the ethnic music of immigrants from other regions 

and African slaves to create a uniquely American sound; 

Whereas in 1922, a country music performance was broadcast on the radio for the first time, and the earliest commercial recording of country music was made, featuring 

the song ‘‘Sallie Gooden’’, performed by fiddlist A.C. 

‘‘Eck’’ Robertson; 

Whereas throughout the 1920s, the earliest country music 

records and radio programs brought the music out of the 

rural heartland and into homes across the United States; 

Whereas no institution is more closely associated with country music than WSM Radio’s Grand Ole Opry in Nashville, Tennessee, which, since 1925, has introduced the 

United States to many of the great talents of country 

music through live Saturday night performances; 
2 

•HRES 650 EH 

Whereas two of the top selling solo artists of all time, Elvis 

Presley and Garth Brooks, are rooted in country music; 

Whereas Garth Brooks, with 128,000,000 records sold, is the 

top selling solo artist in United States history; 

Whereas top country musician Willie Nelson said that country music is where ‘‘people tell their life stories’’; and 

Whereas country music continues to increase in popularity in 

the United States and around the world: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) declares country music to be a uniquely American art form; and 

(2) recognizes that country music should be honored for its contributions to American life and culture. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13635]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-534-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

May 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 22, 1996, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle), P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 77251-1642, filed in 
Docket No. CP96-534-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon and remove an 
existing meter and regulation facility located in Seward County, Kansas 
under Panhandle's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-83-000 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Panhandle proposes to abandon and remove the existing meter and 
regulation facility (Okan Sales Meter) which was used to deliver gas to 
Koch Pipelines, Inc. (Koch) pursuant to an Industrial Gas Contract 
between Panhandle and Koch. Panhandle states that the Industrial Gas 
Contract has terminated and Koch has not sought service since 1994. By 
letter dated September 1, 1995, Panhandle and Koch mutually agreed to 
the abandonment of the Okan Sales Meter.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13635 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Adam Cegielski, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Uranium Hunter
Corporation;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: February 13, 2008             By:  /s/ Adam Cegielski
       -----------------                  ------------------
                                          Adam Cegielski,
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

v.

Kip Mickail Lessard,

 Defendant.

No. CR-17-01533-PHX-DGC

ORDER 

Defendant has filed a motion for early termination of his supervised release (Doc. 

40) and the government has filed a response in opposition (Doc. 44). Defendant has filed 

no reply. The Court commends Defendant for the progress he has made in his life and 

supervision thus far, but believes he should serve half of his supervised release term before 

early termination is considered. Defendant may re-file his motion after he has successfully 

completed 18 months of supervised release. Defendant’s current motion (Doc. 40) is 

denied.

Dated this 22nd day of September, 2022.

Case 2:17-cr-01533-DGC Document 45 Filed 09/22/22 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 10, 2022

No. 04-22-00451-CV

IN RE Francisco Moises GARZA III

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On July 21, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and the record, this court concluded 

relator did not show he is entitled to the relief sought and denied relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus on September 21, 2022. See In re Garza, No. 04-22-00451-CV, 2022 WL 4362298 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 21, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

On September 27, 2022, relator filed a motion for rehearing that requested this court rule 

on an issue not raised in relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. After consideration, relator’s 

motion for rehearing is DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on October 10, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

1

 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI12544, styled In the Interest of C.R.G.P., a Minor Child, pending 

in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.

FILE COPY
LEIF WHITE,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT 

ASSISTANCE APPEALS 

COMMISSION and NEXUS 

STAFFING SOLUTIONS,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4639

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 11, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Frank E. Brown, Chairman.

Leif White, pro se, Appellant.

Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, and Louis A. Gutierrez, Assistant Court 

Chief, Tallahassee, for Appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hill v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 686 So. 2d 658, 

659 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Ahlswede v. Brumm Contracting, Inc., 583 So. 2d 438 

(Fla. 3d DCA 1991). 
MARSTILLER and RAY, JJ, and TERRELL, TERRY D., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, 

CONCUR.

2
#### Genevieve NAES, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Daryl NAES, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 62454.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 15, 1993.

Steven S. Fluhr, Gourley, Sallerson, Fluhr & Moore, Clayton, for respondent/appellant.

Charles E. Bridges, Bridges & Seibel, P.C., St. Charles, for petitioner/respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

Husband appeals from that portion of the Decree of Dissolution of Marriage awarding maintenance to wife. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory J. Kuykendall, Bar # 012508

Amy P. Knight, Bar # 031374

KUYKENDALL & ASSOCIATES

531 S Convent Avenue

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 792-8033

greg@kuykendall-law.com

amyknight@kuykendall-law.com

Attorneys for Defendant Scott Daniel Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT DANIEL WARREN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.CR-18-00223-001-TUC-RCC

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

CONTINUE TRIAL

It is expected that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 

3161(h)(7)(A) may occur as a result of this motion or of an order based thereon.

Defendant, Scott Daniel Warren, by and through his pro bono attorneys

Gregory J. Kuykendall and Amy P. Knight, respectfully requests that this Court 

continue the November 14, 2018 trial, and convene a scheduling conference to 

select a new date. This proposed continuance is being requested because 

significant issues remain to be resolved before a trial can be conducted in this case, 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

including pending motions to dismiss and to suppress evidence and a motion for 

discovery. 

Counsel for the Government have been consulted and have no objection to 

this motion.

Undersigned counsel avows that this request for a continuance has not been 

made for purposes of harassment or delay.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 25th day of October, 2018.

By /s/ Amy P. Knight

Gregory J. Kuykendall

Amy P. Knight

531 S Convent Avenue

Tucson, AZ 85701

Attorneys for Defendant Scott 

Daniel Warren

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on October 25th, 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF 

version of this document to the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System for filing 

and for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF 

registrants: 

Nathaniel J. Walters, Esq. (email: Nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov) 

Anna R. Wright, Esq. (email: anna.wright@usdoj.gov) 

United States Attorney’s Office 

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, AZ 85701
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Paul E. Clayton, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jamba, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 31, 2007
Amendment dated December 17, 2008 to 2007 Severance Letter



 Exhibit 10(i)(3) 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED SEVERANCE LETTER AGREEMENT 
 PROVIDING CERTAIN BENEFITS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT 
 FOLLOWING A CHANGE IN CONTROL

 WHEREAS, Xerox Corporation (the “Company”) has adopted the Amended and Restated Severance Letter Agreement Providing Certain Benefits
Upon Termination of Employment Following a Change In Control (the “Agreement”), and 
 WHEREAS, The Chief Executive Officer of Xerox
Corporation, or her delegate, may amend the Agreement as she in her sole discretion deems necessary or appropriate to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and guidance thereunder, and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement, 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended by adding at the end of Section 8 the following sentence: 
 “No offset or reduction of
amounts under this Agreement shall be permitted to the extent it results in a prohibited substitution under Code section 409A and regulations thereunder.” 
 The foregoing Amendment is effective as of the effective date of the Agreement. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed as of this 17th day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	 XEROX CORPORATION

		
	 By
	 	 /s/    PATRICIA M.
NAZEMETZ        

		 	Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28581-28582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14046]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[CC Docket 96-45; DA 96-855]


Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 29, 1996, Federal Communications Commission released a 
public notice, as required by law, to announce a meeting of the 
Federal-State Joint Board on June 5, 1996. The purpose of the notice is 
to inform the general public of a meeting that will be held by the 
Federal-State Joint Board on universal service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Reel, Accounting and Audits 
Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-0834.

Supplementary Information: The Federal-State Joint Board in CC Docket 
96-45 will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, June 5, 1996 at 12:30 
p.m., in Room 856 at 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. At the 
meeting, the Federal-State Joint Board will hear from a panel of 
experts addressing universal service issues set forth in Section 254 of 
the Telecommunications Act.


[[Page 28582]]


Federal Communications Commission.
John S. Morabito,
Deputy Chief, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-14046 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT AUGUST 7, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]

I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 15306 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 7 - 0 0 0 1 3 - C R - WS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s D A V I D A N T H O N Y M O R R I S O N , J R ., D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e So u th e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( A u gu s t 7, 2008) B efo re T JO F L A T , D U B IN A an d B L A C K , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: W illia m H u g h e s , c o u n s e l f o rD a v id M o rr is o n in th is d ir e c t c r im in a l ap p e a l,2

ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the appe l l a nta nd f

i l e d a br i e f pur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 4 9 3 (1 9 6 7 ). O u r in d ep en d en t rev iew o f th e e n ti re re co rd re v ea ls th at co u n se l’ s a s s e s s m e ntof

the r e l a t i ve m e r i tof

the appe a l i s c orr e c t . B e c aus e i nde pe nde nt ex am in atio n o f th e e n ti re re co rd re v ea ls n o ar g u ab le issu es o f m er it , co u n se l’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and M orri son’ s c on vi ct i on and sent ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
Exhibit 32.1

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles
Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and results of
operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.



/s/ Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of DirectorsDate: March 20, 2006
EXHIBIT
32.1.








Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Ed
Bailey, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of LightTouch
Vein & Laser, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period December 31, 2008 of the Registrant, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:  April
14,
2009                                                                           By:  /s/ Ed
Bailey


Ed Bailey


Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Accounting


Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and will be retained by LightTouch
Vein & Laser, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.