alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of pSivida Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Soja, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                    
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date:               |  | February 11, 2009                                  
|                   
|/s/ Michael J. Soja
|Name:               |  | Michael J. Soja                                    
|Title:              |  | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Robert Francis Krebs,

 Defendant.

CR 18-00263-JGZ-JR-1

ORDER TO UNSEAL 

STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING 

TRANSCRIPT HELD JUNE 10th, 2019

(Doc 68)

On motion of the United States of America (Doc. 91), and good cause having been 

shown:

IT IS ORDERED that the clerk shall unseal the Status Conference re Competency 

hearing held on June 10th, 2019, for defendant Robert Francis Krebs for the purpose of 

releasing a copy of the transcript of the hearing to the Government. The Status Conference 

shall be re sealed thereafter. All other sealing orders shall remain in effect.

Dated this 20th day of September, 2019.

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 94 Filed 09/20/19 Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PHILLIP WENDELL PAIGE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 16

- 1196 and 4D16

- 1197

[ October 12, 2017 ]

Consolidated a ppeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Steven J. Levin , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 15000066CFAXMX and 15000068CFAXMX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallah assee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1420]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-85; RM-8518]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Copeland, KS

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Greater Plains Christian 
Radio, Inc., allots Channel *280C1 to Copeland, Kansas, as a reserved 
channel for noncommercial use, to provide the community with an 
additional FM service. See 60 FR 32935, June 26, 1995. Channel *280C1 
can be allotted to Copeland, Kansas, in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements without the 
imposition of a site restriction. The coordinates for Channel *280C1 at 
Copeland are 37-32-31 and 100-37-45. With this action, this proceeding 
is terminated.

DATES: Effective March 4, 1996. The window period for filing 
applications will open on March 4, 1996, and close on March 19, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 95-85, adopted December 7, 1995, and 
released January 19, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, 
NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Kansas, is 
amended by adding Channel *280C1 at Copeland.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-1420 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13643]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM96-2-43-004]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 22, 1996, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Second Substitute Eighth Revised Sheet No. 6
Second Substitute Ninth Revised Sheet No. 6A

    The proposed effective date of these tariff sheets is January 1, 
1996.
    WNG states that this filing is being made in compliance with 
Commission order issued May 13, 1996 in Docket No. TM96-2-43-001. WNG 
was directed to file revised tariff sheets within 15 days of the date 
of the order to comply with section 154.102(e)(5) of the Commission's 
regulations. Section 154.102(e)(5) requires tariff sheets which are 
filed to comply with a Commission order to carry the following notation 
in the bottom margin: ``Filed to comply the following notation in the 
bottom margin: ``Filed to comply with order of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, Docket No. (number), issued (date), (FERC 
Reports citation).''
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service lists maintained by the Commission in the dockets 
referenced above and on all jurisdictional customers and interested 
state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 96-13643 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 23.01



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
pertaining  to the 1987  Stock  Option  Plan  (Form  S-8 No.  33-77060)  and the
Registration  Statement  pertaining  to the 1995 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No.
33-93048) of ATMI,  Inc. of our report dated February 11, 1998,  with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ATMI, Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                               Ernst & Young LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
March 19, 1998
#### Ex parte Oliver David CRUZ.

No. 29545-01.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

April 22, 1996.

Michael D. Bernard, San Antonio, for appellant.

Steven C. Hilbig, District Attorney, San Antonio, Matthew Paul, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

On October 27, 1989, applicant was found guilty of the offense of capital murder. After the jury returned affirmative answers to the special issues submitted under Art. 37.071, V.A.C.C.P., punishment was assessed at death. This Court affirmed applicant’s conviction on direct appeal. *Cruz v. State,*No. 71,004 (Tex.Cr.App. delivered June 23, 1993).

On September 13,1995, this Court granted applicant’s request for a stay of his execution which had been scheduled to be carried out on September 15, 1995. Applicant sought the stay in order to afford this Court an opportunity to appoint counsel to file an initial application for writ of habeas corpus under the provisions of Art. 11.071, See. 2(d), V.A.C.C.P. Upon due consideration, we find no necessity for the appointment of counsel.

On December 16, 1994, applicant was appointed counsel by the trial court under the provisions of Art. 26.04, V.A.C.C.P. Such appointment took place following the denial of a petition for writ of certiorari. Counsel, Michael D. Bernard, was appointed to file a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus on behalf of applicant. The appointment remains in effect and clearly encompasses the filing of a initial application for writ of habeas corpus. In view of applicant’s current representation by counsel, no appointment by this Court is necessary.

The stay of execution granted by this Court on September 13, 1995, is vacated.
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51147,
      Inc.,
      for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2007, I, Michael Zahorik, Chief Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51147, Inc. hereby certify pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
Such
      Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ended July 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of 51147, Inc.




Dated:
      October 2, 2007




**51147,
      INC.**




By:
            */s/
                Michael
                Zahorik*
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 694 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a twothirds vote on a rule or order that dispenses with the first reading 

or considers a measure as read. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2009 

Mr. FORBES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require a two-thirds vote on a rule or order that dispenses with the first reading or considers a measure 

as read. 

1 Resolved, That clause 6(c) of rule XIII of the Rules 

2 of the House of Representatives is amended by inserting 

3 before the period at the end thereof the following: ‘‘, or 

4 a rule or order that would dispense with the first reading 

5 or consider a measure as read, unless so ordered by a vote 

6 of two-thirds of the Members voting, a quorum being 

7 present’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Ronald PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56495.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 6, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 11, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied May 15, 1990.

Michael C. Todt, Marc B. Fried, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Robert P. Sass, Asst. At-tys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26 (now repealed). We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Debra RAU, Appellant, v. K.P.S. KAMATH, M.D., Respondent.

No. 69812.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

July 23, 1996.

Albert M. Spradling, II, Spradling & Spra-dling, Cape Girardeau, for appellant.

Matthew M. Mocherman, Finch, Bradshaw, Strom & Steele, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Debra Rau (“plaintiff’), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau denying recovery in her action against K.P.S. Kamath (“defendant”) for breach of an employment contract. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. As as extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court pursuant to 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is provided solely for the use of the parties involved.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Henian Wu, the
Chairman of China TMK Battery Systems Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this statement this16th day of August,
2010.

/s/ Henian
WuHenian Wu Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and will be retained by
China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 ofthe United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of IHS Inc. (the “Company”),that, to his knowledge, the Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended February 29,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

This written statement isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to suchreport. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date: March 28, 2008

 
| /s/ Jerre L. Stead                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jerre L. Stead                                        |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer                 |   |
|                                                  |   |
| /s/ Michael J. Sullivan                               |   |
| Michael J. Sullivan                                   |   |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

d0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147698

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147698

COA: 312679

Saginaw CC: 10-034982-FH

ROBERT WILLIAM WHYTE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Earl (Docket No. 145677) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The table below lists DDi Corps consolidated subsidiaries. The ownership of these entities is as
follows:



|                                               |  |                              |  |                                                       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Name                                           |  | Jurisdiction of Organization |  | Ownership                                             
|DDi Intermediate Holdings Corp.                |  | California                   |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Corp.                      
|DDi Capital Corp.                              |  | California                   |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Intermediate Holdings Corp.
|Dynamic Details, Incorporated                  |  | California                   |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Capital Corp.              
|DDi Sales Corp.                                |  | Delaware                     |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|Sovereign Circuits, Inc.                       |  | Ohio                         |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|Sovereign Flex Products, LLC                   |  | Ohio                         |  | 100% directly owned by Sovereign Circuits, Inc.       
|DDi Canada Acquisition Corp.                   |  | Ontario, Canada              |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|Dynamic Details Canada, Inc.                   |  | Ontario, Canada              |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Canada Acquisition Corp.   
|Laminate Technology Corp.                      |  | Delaware                     |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|Dynamic Details Incorporated, Silicon Valley   |  | Delaware                     |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|Dynamic Details Incorporated, Colorado Springs |  | Colorado                     |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|Dynamic Details Texas, L.L.C.                  |  | Delaware                     |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|DDi Europe Limited                             |  | United Kingdom               |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Corp.                      
|DDi Group Limited                              |  | United Kingdom               |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Europe Limited             
|DDi Tolworth Limited                           |  | United Kingdom               |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Group Limited              
|DDi Precision Limited                          |  | United Kingdom               |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Group Limited              
|DDi Marlow Limited                             |  | United Kingdom               |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Europe Limited
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Volcan Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sholom Feldman, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |     |                                                       
|----------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
November 19, 2008 | By: | /s/ SHOLOM FELDMAN                                    
|                        |     | Sholom Feldman                                        
|                        |     | Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)