alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
  I, Curtis W. Fox, certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Electronic Corporate Filing Services, Inc. ;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report;
  4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;
  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c) presented in this Annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this Annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated: July 15, 2003.
 /S/Curtis W. Fox
 Curtis W. Fox
 Audit Committee Member
 sole officer and director
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41158

Summary Calendar

HECTOR R. GARZA-MATA, Pro Se & Siblings similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, in his official capacity as head of the Department of Justice; 

DAVID L. NEAL, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals; JOHN 

KERRY, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, 

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO 

MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; RON 

ROSENBERG, Chief of the Administrative Appeals Office - U.S. Citizenship 

and Immigration Services; ALBERT W. BLAKEWAY, Field Office Director -

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - San Antonio, Texas, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CV-48

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 20, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41158 Document: 00512976163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2015
No. 14-41158

PER CURIAM:*

The lengthy complaint filed by the Plaintiff lists what is thought to have 

been official mistakes affecting his grandmother and other family members in 

past years. But no claim that warrants legal relief now by a federal court is 

set forth. As for the claim of citizenship, the district court has correctly 

explained why that must fail. The court also explained why the other civil and 

constitutional rights discussed by the Plaintiff state no legal complaint against 

any defendant. The case must be dismissed.

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

 

 Case: 14-41158 Document: 00512976163 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2015
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14492]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 052196D]


Marine Mammals; Permit No. 716 (P466)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of modification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on May 20, 1996, permit no. 716, 
issued to Mr. Scott D. Kraus, Edgerton Research Laboratory, New England 
Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, MA 02110-3309, was modified.

ADDRESSES: The modification and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130 Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/712-2289);
    Director, Southeast Region, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive 
North, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813/893-3141); and
    Director, Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, 
MA 01930-2298 (508/281-9250).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject modification has been issued 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the provisions of paragraphs (d) and 
(e) of Sec. 216.33 of the regulations of the governing the taking and 
importing (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the provisions of 
Sec. 222.25 of the regulations governing the taking, importing, and 
exporting of endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR part 222).
    Permit no. 716 authorizes the inadvertent harassment of up to 350 
right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) annually during the course of photo-
identification and aerial survey activities. Of these 350 animals, up 
to 50 may be biopsy sampled annually and up to 10 may be radio tagged 
annually. The permit holder may also import/export right whale tissues 
for scientific research purposes. The permit's duration has been 
extended through August 31, 1996. This is a time extension only and 
involves no increase in the number of animals authorized to be taken 
under the permit.
    Issuance of this permit as required by the ESA was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-14492 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
SCWC

- 15

- 0000102

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE

HOLDERS OF THE ASSET BACKED SECURITIES CORPORATION HOME EQUITY

LOAN TRUST, SERIES AMQ 2006

- HE7 ASSET BACKED PASS

- THROUGH

CERTIFICATES, SERIES AMQ 2006

- HE7, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

MO NICA EWALANI BERNARDINO, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant,

and

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE ARBORS, EWA BY GENTRY

COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, HAWAIIAN TEL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Respondents/Defendants

- Appellees.

__________________________________________ ______________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 15

- 0000102; CIV. NO. 11

- 1

- 0841)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant

- A ppellant Monica Ewalani

Bernadino’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August

15, 2016, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, September 26 , 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed
Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000102

26-SEP-2016

10:17 AM
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29164-29165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14260]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. RSI-95-1, Notice No. 2]


Regulatory Reinvention; Notice of Railroad Safety Advisory 
Committee (RSAC) Task Acceptance

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Railroad Safety Advisory Committee Task Acceptance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the President's March 4, 1995, directive regarding 
regulatory reinvention, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 
conducted an intensive review of its regulations and committed itself 
to eliminating and reinventing over 95 pages of regulations from the 
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) by June 1, 1996. Consistent with the 
President's initiative on reinventing government, FRA chartered a new 
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) for consensual rulemaking and 
deliberation on key railroad safety issues. At the Committee's 
inaugural meeting on April 1-2, 1996, the RSAC accepted regulatory 
reinvention of: power brake systems for freight equipment (49 CFR Part 
232), the Track Safety Standards

[[Page 29165]]

(49 CFR Part 213), and the Radio Standards and Procedures (49 CFR Part 
220).
    In addition, FRA has decided that the Passenger Equipment Safety 
Standards and Passenger Train Emergency Preparedness working groups, 
which currently are addressing the reinvention of 49 CFR Part 223, 
Safety Glazing Standards, and the steam locomotive standards working 
group, which currently is addressing the reinvention of 49 CFR Part 
230, Steam Locomotive Inspection, should all continue their operation 
under the aegis of the RSAC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky McCully, FRA, 400 7th Street, 
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590 at (202) 366-6569; Lisa Levine, Office of 
Chief Counsel, FRA, 400 7th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590 at 
(202) 366-0621; or Grady C. Cothen, Jr., Deputy Associate Administrator 
for Safety Standards Program Development, FRA, 400 7th Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20590 at (202) 366-0897.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on May 30, 1996.
Donald M. Itzkoff,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-14260 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 25, 2010

s0622 

# Order

June 25, 2010

140384

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140384 COA: 287034 Ingham CC: 08-000412-AR SIRDAREAN ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 19, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY



### , C.J., and C AVANAGH 

### and C ORRIGAN 

### , JJ., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals.
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Revolutions Medical Corporation
(formerly Maxxon,  Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Rondald L. Wheet , Chief Executive Officer (and
principal  financial  officer) of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


April 13, 2007                         /s/ RONDALD L. WHEET
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Rondald L. Wheet,
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       principal financial officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                          ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT

         This Acknowledgment and Agreement dated as of March 11, 2003, is
executed by Hallmark Entertainment Investments Co. ("HEIC").

         WHEREAS, Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, Inc. ("HEH") is a shareholder
of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. ("Company"), and is a party to that certain Second
Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated as of August 30, 2001, by and
among Hallmark Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corporation, Liberty Crown,
Inc., VISN Management Corp., JP Morgan Partners (BHCA), L.P. and DirecTV
Enterprises, Inc. (the "Stockholders Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, concurrently herewith, HEH is contributing to HEIC, HEH's
shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock of the Company ("Company Stock"); and

         WHEREAS, such transfer is permitted pursuant to Section 3.4 of the
Stockholders Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, HEIC hereby acknowledges and agrees as follows:

         HEIC shall hereby become a signatory to the Stockholders Agreement and
shall receive the same rights set forth therein and be bound by the same
obligations set forth therein as HEH, except as provided in Section 3.4 and
Section 3.5 of the Stockholders Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HEH has caused this Acknowledgement and Agreement
to be executed as of the date set forth above.

                                          HALLMARK ENTERTAINMENT INVESTMENTS CO.


                                          By:  /s/  Deanne R. Stedem /s/
                                             -----------------------------------
                                          Title:   Vice President
                                                --------------------------------
**EXHIBIT
      32.1/32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cellular Accessories
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Clifford Chapman, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Clifford ChapmanName:
              Clifford ChapmanTitle:
                Chief Executive and Financial Officer
              Date:
                May 14, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Dustin Lee Boni,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00227-01-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER

On August 4, 2020, Defendant appeared before this Court for an initial appearance 

regarding the Superseding Petition to Revoke Supervised Release. The issue of detention 

was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the Superseding Petition and file in 

determining whether Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a superseding 

petition to revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if 

released pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 

and 18 U.S.C. § 3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 5

th day of August, 2020.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00227-JJT Document 58 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Maurice WILLIAMS, Appellant.

No. 62592.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Seven.

July 20, 1993.

Emily N. Blood, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KAROHL, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and CRANDALL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from conviction of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020 RSMo 1986.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (BPV) 

ORDER 

 The Court has reviewed the Reports and Recommendation filed by Magistrate 

Judge Velasco (Doc. 110) and (Doc. 134), the objections filed thereto and response filed 

on behalf of the Government. 

IT IS ORDERED the Court adopts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge 

and DENIES the Motion to Suppress (Doc. 53), and DENIES the Motion to Dismiss 

Indictment for Violation of International Law (Doc. 115). 

 Dated this 19th day of December, 2018. 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 151 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Michael ZEFAS, Respondent, v. Nina ZEFAS, Appellant,

No. WD 46164.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 23, 1993.

James T. Cook, Kansas City, for appellant.

Michael E. Zefas, pro se.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the trial court’s judgment modifying the decree of dissolution as it pertains to visitation and from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to modify child support.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT C

Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-4 Filed 03/21/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-4 Filed 03/21/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-4 Filed 03/21/19 Page 3 of 3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00858-CV

SOUTHCROSS CCNG TRANSMISSION, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

Ivy GONZALEZ on behalf of M.R. and M.N. Gonzalez, Minor Children; Amy Gonzalez, as 

Co-Representative of the Estate of Jesus Gonzalez Jr. for and on behalf of M.R. Gonzalez and 

M.N. Gonzalez, Minor Children; and Amy Gonzalez and Jesus Gonzalez Sr., 

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-18-82 and DC-18-83

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 29, 2020

PERMISSIVE APPEAL DENIED; DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

In the underlying suit, the plaintiffs sued Southcross CCNG Transmission Ltd. over a fatal 

workplace accident. The plaintiffs brought wrongful death claims and a survival claim on behalf 

of the estate. CCNG moved for summary judgment against the plaintiffs’ claims based on res 

judicata, but the trial court denied the motion. However, the trial court granted permission for a 

permissive appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3; 

Sabre Travel Int’l, Ltd. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, 567 S.W.3d 725, 730 (Tex. 2019). 
04-19-00858-CV

- 2 -

Generally, an order that does not dispose of all claims and all parties is interlocutory and 

is not an appealable order. See id. (citing Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 

2001)). The legislature has authorized interlocutory appeals in certain exceptional circumstances, 

e.g., TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014, but we construe those exceptions narrowly, 

CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011). 

Here, Petitioner CCNG seeks permission to appeal and argues res judicata is a controlling 

question of law, there is a substantial difference of opinion on the privity element of res judicata, 

and an immediate appeal will materially advance the ultimate termination of litigation. See TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d); Sabre Travel Int’l, 567 S.W.3d at 731–32. The 

plaintiffs argue a permissive appeal is not warranted because the crucial question on privity is one 

of fact, not law; there is no substantial ground for difference of opinion on privity; and an

immediate appeal will not materially advance the ultimate termination of litigation. See Sabre 

Travel Int’l, 567 S.W.3d at 731–32.

Having considered the petition, response, and reply, we deny the petition. See id. We 

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM