Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 21, 1996 / Notices 25487

1 75 FERC ¶ 61,102 (1996).

Effective

Substitute fifth revised sheet

No. 865 .................................. 04/01/93

Sixth substitute fourth revised

sheet No. 866 ........................ 11/01/91

Substitute fifth revised sheet

No. 866 .................................. 04/01/93

Sixth substitute third revised

sheet No. 905 ........................ 11/01/91

Substitute fourth revised sheet

No. 905 .................................. 04/01/93

Sixth substitute fourth revised

sheet No. 906 ........................ 11/01/91

Substitute fifth revised sheet

No. 906 .................................. 04/01/93

Fourth substitute first revised

sheet No. 1008 ...................... 11/01/91

Substitute second revised sheet

No. 1008 ................................ 04/01/93

Original volume No. 3:

7 Sub fourth revised sheet No.

2 ............................................. 11/01/91

3 Sub fifth revised sheet No. 2 01/01/92

2 Sub sixth revised sheet No. 2 10/01/92

2 Sub seventh revised sheet

No. 2 ...................................... 01/01/93

Substitute eighth revised sheet

No. 2 ...................................... 04/01/93

Substitute ninth revised sheet

No. 2 ...................................... 10/01/93

7 Sub fourth revised sheet No.

3 ............................................. 11/01/91

4 Sub fifth revised sheet No. 3 01/01/92

3 Sub alt sixth revised sheet

No. 3 ...................................... 05/01/92

2 Sub seventh revised sheet

No. 3 ...................................... 10/01/92

2 Sub eighth revised sheet No.

3 ............................................. 01/01/93

Substitute ninth revised sheet

No. 3 ...................................... 04/01/93

Substitute tenth revised sheet

No. 3 ...................................... 10/01/93

Great Lakes states that, pursuant to

the Commission’s rehearing order, any

party owing surcharge amounts must

notify Great Lakes in writing no later

than August 8, 1996, as to whether that

party elects to make such payment in a

lump sum or to amortize payment over

a period of three years or less.

Great Lakes states that copies of the

filing were served upon all parties to

these proceedings, each of Great Lakes’

customers, and the Public Service

Commissions of the States of Michigan,

Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street NE., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with 18 CFR

385.211 of the Commission’s rules and

Regulations. All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before

May 22, 1996. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceedings.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12676 Filed 5–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. TM96–4–25–001]

Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Compliance

Filing

May 15, 1996.

Take notice that on April 22, 1996,

Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation (MRT) submitted for filing

revised worksheets reflecting the

calculation of Miscellaneous Revenues

in accordance with Section 18 of the

General Terms and Conditions of MRT’s

FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume

No. 1 and in compliance with the April

11, 1996 ‘‘Order Denying Request for

Waiver’’ issued by the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission in this

proceeding.

MRT states that, as explained in its

filing, the worksheets reflect the

calculation of Miscellaneous Revenues

applicable to the period November 1,

1993 through October 31, 1995 for the

cashout costs related to onsystem

imbalances, and the period November 1,

1993 through March 31, 1995 for the

cashout costs related to offsystem

imbalances.

MRT states that copies of the

compliance filing have been mailed to

all parties on the official service list.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with 18 CFR

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed on or before May 22, 1996. All

protests filed with the Commission will

be considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceedings. Copies of this filing

are on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12669 Filed 5–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP96–195–000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;

Notice of Technical Conference

May 15, 1996.

In the Commission’s order issued on

April 26, 1996, in the above-captioned

proceeding,1 the Commission held that

the filing raises issues for which a

technical conference is to be convened.

The conference has been scheduled

for Wednesday, May 29, 1996, at 1:00

p.m. in a room to be designated at the

offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

All interested persons and Staff are

permitted to attend.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12670 Filed 5–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–357–004]

Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Report Filing

May 15, 1996.

Take notice that on April 30, 1996,

Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation

(Texas Eastern) filed a report discussing

its actual experience regarding the

‘‘enhanced segment rights’’ and the

‘‘capacity release’’ procedures. The

report is pursuant to an order issued

April 17, 1995 in Docket No. RP94–357–

000.

The enhanced segmented

transportation rights allow customers to

receive and deliver their zone limit

(MDQ adjusted for capacity release)

once in each upstream market zone.

These rights also give customers the

right to deliver gas to Texas Eastern

storage points without these deliveries

being included in the calculation of gas

delivered in excess of customer’s

contract MDQ.

Texas Eastern states that the report

shows that 56 percent of enhanced

segment rights transactions that

occurred during the period October

1994 through February 1996 involved

the use of capacity under released

contracts. Texas Eastern also states that

the report shows that the use of capacity

release on its system has increased

significantly. The report reflects that for

the 12 months ended February 29, 1996,

as compared to the 12 months ended

February 28, 1995, capacity release

delivered volumes increased by 61

percent, reservation charge credit backs

increased by 66 percent, and total deals

increased by 95 percent.