alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joe S. WOHLGEMUTH, Appellant. Joe S. WOHLGEMUTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 43373, WD 46509.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 29, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 28, 1993.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., E. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and TURNAGE and KENNEDY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from judgment of conviction for assault in the first degree § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and sentence of life imprisonment and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986, and sentence of life imprisonment with sentences to run concurrently.

Appeal from judgment denying relief under Rule 29.15.

Judgments affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11102]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
April 26, 1996

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.
    Docket Number: OST-96-1312.
    Date filed: April 25, 1996.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: COMP Reso 024f--South Africa/Swaziland, Local Currency 
Fare Changes, Intended effective date: June 1, 1996.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1313.
    Date filed: April 25, 1996.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: CSC/Reso/001--Expedited dated April 9, 1996, Expedited 
Resos--18th Cargo services Conference (Summary attached.), Intended 
effective date: July 1, 1996.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1314.
    Date filed: April 25, 1996.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: CSC/Reso/001--NON-Expedited dated April 9, 1996, Finally 
Adopted Resos--18th CSC (Summary attached.), Intended effective date: 
October 1, 1996.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 96-11102 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Sutor Technology Group Limited (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yongfei
Jiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Yongfei JiangYongfei
      Jiang
                  Chief
      Financial Officer





September
25, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sutor Technology Group Limited and will be retained by Sutor Technology Group
Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13674]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE: June 5, 1996, 9:00-9:30 a.m.

PLACE: ARRB, 600 E Street, NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Review and Accept Minutes of Last Open Meeting
2. Amendment of Board Procedures
3. Other Business

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas Samoluk, Associate Director 
for Communications, 600 E Street, NW, Second Floor, Washington, DC 
20530. Telephone: (202) 724-0088; Fax: (202) 724-0457.
David G. Marwell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 96-13674 Filed 5-28-96; 2:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 6118-01-M
```
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  1.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141810 pertaining to various benefit plans
including equity, savings and deferred compensation plans),2.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-141898),3.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-115148),4.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-66088),5.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-47532),6.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-31394), and7.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No 333-32036);
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20076 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MODESTO CANALES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-0074-01
- - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE', and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Modesto Canales argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions for making false statements on his income tax returns for the years 1987-89; that the district court erred by refusing to require the Government to produce the handwritten interview notes of an Internal Revenue Service Agent; and that the district court erroneously increased his Sentencing Guidelines offense level for obstruction of justice and the useNo. 95-20076 -2- of his specialized accounting skills in the commission of the offense. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we discern no reversible error. AFFIRMED.
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 2 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 3 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 4 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 5 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 6 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 7 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 8 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 9 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 10 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 11 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 12 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 13 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 14 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 15 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 16 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 17 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 18 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 19 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 20 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 21 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 22 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 23 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 24 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 25 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 26 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 27 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 28 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 29 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 30 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 31 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 32 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 33 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 34 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 35 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 36 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 37 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 38 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 39 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 40 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 41 of 42
Case 3:18-cv-08004-GMS--JZB Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 42 of 42
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 114TH DISTRIC T COURT OF SMITH COU NTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2nd
day of September, 2015 , the caus e upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

BRANDEE MICHELLE NIC HOLS , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00287

- CR; Trial Court No. 114

- 0561

- 14

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record and the briefs filed herein; and the same being inspected, it is the opinion of the Court that the trial court’s judgment below

should be modified and, as modified, affirme d

.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the trial court’s judgment

below be modified to reflect that Appellant pleaded “true” to enhancement paragraphs one and two, the trial court found enhancement paragraphs one and two “true,” and the pl ea on the jurisdictional paragraph was “none” and as modified , the trial court’s judgment is affirmed ; and

that this decision be certified to the trial court below for observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, wi th the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Ty l er, this the 27 th day of October 2015.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Metrics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald Ryder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011





/s/ Ronald RyderRonald RyderChief Financial OfficerImage Metrics Inc.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Graphics International Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 24, 2010 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mark J. Barrenechea, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James D. Wheat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: February 2, 2011


In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 2 nd day of February, 2011





/s/    Mark J. Barrenechea/s/    James D. WheatMark J. BarrenecheaJames D. WheatCEO and PresidentChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### GEO VIKING, INC., Petitioner, v. TEX-LEE OPERATING COMPANY, Respondent.

No. D-1678.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1992.

Rehearing Overruled Dec. 9, 1992.

*798PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The motions for rehearing are overruled. The per curiam opinion and judgment of this court issued April 22, 1992 are withdrawn. Further, the order of this court of April 22, 1992, granting the application for writ of error is withdrawn, as the application was improvidently granted.

In denying petitioner’s application for writ of error, we should not be understood as approving or disapproving the opinions of the court of appeals analyzing the rule of capture or trespass as they apply to hydraulic fracturing.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed February 27, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01691-CV

DAVID W. BARNETT, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A TEXAS NEUROSURGERY, 

Appellant

V.

JAMES TIMOTHY EDGE AND MAI LYNETT EDGE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04671-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice Myers

By motion filed February 18, 2014, appellant states the dispute at issue in this appeal has 

been resolved and moves to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

 

131691F.P05 /Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID W. BARNETT, M.D., 

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A TEXAS 

NEUROSURGERY, Appellant

No. 05-13-01691-CV V.

JAMES TIMOTHY EDGE AND MAI 

LYNETT EDGE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04671-A.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

Subject to any agreement between the parties, we ORDER that appellees James Timothy 

Edge and Mai Lynett Edge recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant David W. 

Barnett, M.D., Individually and d/b/a Texas Neurosurgery.

Judgment entered this 27th day of February, 2014.

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 26 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 26 Filed 02/14/18 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
31.1**
   **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 
 
 I, David
V. Lott, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Limelight Media
Group, Inc., certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Limelight Media Group,
      Inc.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 
 4.
    I
      am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the registrant and have:
 
 a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth quarter
      of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    I
      have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
      over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 
 b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 ****Date: April
      14, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David V. LottDavid V. LottChief
      Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of I.C. Isaacs &
Company, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, Robert S. Stec, Chief Executive Officer, and Gregg A. Holst,
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(i)   
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)  
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:
May 16,
2008 /s/  Robert
S. Stec


Robert S. Stec, Chief Executive
Officer








/s/
Timothy J.
Tumminello


Timothy J. Tumminello, Interim
Principle Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, H. Kerr Taylor, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an
officer of the General Partner of the Company, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully
 complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |              |        |                                                                                                                                                              
|----- | ------------ | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | May 13, 2011 | By:    | /s/ H. Kerr Taylor                                                                                                                                           
|      |              | Name:  | H. Kerr Taylor                                                                                                                                               
|      |              | Title: | President and Chief
 Executive Officer of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the
 General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.

---