alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14657]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-247-000]


Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

June 5, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 29, 1996, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective July 1, 1996:

First Revised Sheet No. 32
Second Revised Sheet No. 35
First Revised Sheet No. 38
Second Revised Sheet No. 41

    Midwestern states that the proposed filing conforms the provisions 
of its LMS-MA and LMS-PA Rate Schedules related to its annual cashout 
report to industry standards, so that Midwestern may carry forward any 
cashout loss into the subsequent year's annual report. The proposed 
filing also amends section 6(b) Midwestern's Rate Schedules LMS-MA and 
LMS-PA to accurately define the value of gas delivered into or out of 
the Midwestern system. This change will result in consistency between 
Midwestern's LMS-MA and LMS-PA Rate Schedules.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with section 385.214 and section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary,
[FR Doc. 96-14657 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent, v. Ann O’BRIEN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 62600.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 20, 1993.

*697Donald R. Carmody, Michael J. Parnas, Carmody, MacDonald, Hilton & Wolf, P.C., St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.

John A. Ross, Cynthia L. Kieschnick, Clayton, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals her conviction for trespassing in an unincorporated area of St. Louis County. Defendant was fined $100.00 plus court costs and sentenced to sixty days in the county jail.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 31. 1


CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





I, Jack J. Walker certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 of AeroGrow International Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date:  February 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Jack J. WalkerJack J. WalkerChairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14198]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-200-002]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 28, 1996, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to be 
effective April 1, 1996:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 7
Second Revised Sheet No. 167
First Revised Sheet No. 167A
Second Revised Sheet No. 169A
Second Revised Sheet No. 226
First Revised Sheet No. 227
First Revised Sheet No. 302
Second Revised Sheet No. 334A
Second Revised Sheet 334D

    and to be effective May 1, 1996:

Fourth Revised Volume No. 1,
    Second Revised Sheet No. 7

    NGT states that these revised tariff sheets are filed to comply 
with the Commission's order dated April 25, 1996, in Docket No. RP96-
200. NGT is filing these tariff sheets related to specific negotiated 
rates and updating its tariff for the most recent negotiated rate 
transactions.
    Any person desiring to protest the proposed tariff sheets should 
file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of 
the Commission's Rule of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All 
such protest must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14198 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Kenneth L. RANKIN, Petitioner, v. ATWOOD VACUUM MACHINE CO., Respondent.

No. D-2673.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1992.

W. Douglas Matthews, Timothy F. Lee, Roger Rider, Susan Brownlee, for petitioner.

B. Stephen Rice, Rudy Cano, Susan (Stevenson) Crowley, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Rankin sued Atwood Vacuum Machine Co. for negligence, failure to warn and DTPA violations relating to the design, manufacturing, and marketing of a trailer hitch which opened on the highway, resulting in a traffic accident. The trial court rendered judgment on the jury verdict for Atwood Vacuum that Rankin take nothing. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 831 S.W.2d 463. We express no opinion on the issues therein and deny the application. In so doing, however, we should not be taken as approving or disapproving any part of the court of appeals’ opinion.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Charles Burton Foster, 

 Defendant. 

CR 17-1791-TUC-JGZ (LAB) 

O R D E R 

CONTINUING PLEA DEADLINE 

AND TRIAL 

 

 This case is presently set for trial on August 7, 2018. The Defendant filed 

a motion to continue and, for the reasons set forth therein, additional time is required 

to adequately prepare for trial. The Government has no objection to a continuance. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh 

the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial because, for the reasons 

set forth in the motion, failure to grant the continuance is likely to result in a miscarriage 

of justice if the Defendant is required to go to trial on the present trial date. 

 IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The date by which the referred magistrate judge hears the change of plea must 

be no later than September 21, 2018 by 3:00 p.m. 

 2. All motions, unless made during a hearing or trial, shall be in writing and shall 

be made sufficiently in advance of trial to comply with the time periods set forth in 

LRCiv. 7.2 and any court order and to avoid any delays in the trial. Pretrial motions may 

be heard before a magistrate judge and a Report and Recommendation will be provided to 

the district judge assigned to the case. 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. This matter is RESET for trial on October 10, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel are 

to be present at 9:00 a.m. 

 4. Excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7) is found to commence on 

August 8, 2018 and end on October 10, 2018. Such time shall be in addition to other 

excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act and shall commence as of the day following 

the day that would otherwise be the last day for commencement of trial. 

 5. That any and all subpoenas previously issued shall remain in full force and 

effect through the new trial date. 

 6. Any motion or stipulation to continue the scheduled trial date and change 

of plea deadline shall be filed with the Clerk of Court no later than 5:00 p.m., 

Monday, September 24, 2018. Alternatively, by that same deadline, if after 

consultation between government and defense counsel it is determined that a motion 

to continue the scheduled trial date and change of plea deadline will not be filed, 

government counsel shall notify the Court by an email to the chambers email 

address that the case and counsel are ready to proceed to trial on the scheduled trial 

date. The notification shall also include the estimated number of trial days needed 

to complete the trial. 

 Dated this 23rd day of July, 2018.
5963792v1(88888.842)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lindsay G. Leavitt – 029110 

Lleavitt@jsslaw.com 

JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. 

A Professional Limited Liability Company 

One East Washington Street 

Suite 1900 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2554 

Telephone: (602) 262-5911 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

V & P, LLC, 

Defendant.

No. 2:18-cv-0332-DMF

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF 

DEFENDANT’S OFFER OF 

JUDGMENT 

Defendant, V & P, LLC hereby provides notice that on February 28, 2018, it 

served electronically its Offer of Judgment upon all counsel listed in the attached 

mailing certificate. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 28th day of February, 2018. 

JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. 

By: s/ Lindsay G. Leavitt 

Lindsay G. Leavitt 

One East Washington Street, Suite 1900 

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2554 

Defendant 

Case 2:18-cv-00332-DGC Document 12 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 2
2

5963792v1(88888.842)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 28, 2018, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing 

and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF 

registrants: 

Peter Strojnik 

ADA@strojnik.com

STROJNIK, P.C. 

2375 East Camelback Road, Ste. 600 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

 I hereby certify that on February 28, 2018, I served the attached document by 

mail on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF 

System: 

s/ Tana Davis-Digeno 

Case 2:18-cv-00332-DGC Document 12 Filed 02/28/18 Page 2 of 2
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. James J. PRICHARD, Jr., Respondent.

No. 93-SC-544-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Sept. 30, 1993.

*ORDER*

The Kentucky Bar Association, as a result of charges instituted against the respondent, James J. Prichard, Jr., has recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years.

*897The respondent was found guilty of violating Supreme Court Rule 3.130-8.8(b) which prohibits a lawyer from committing a criminal act that reflects adversely upon the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects. The criminal acts so adjudged to be professional misconduct were committing a second offense of operating a motor vehicle on a DUI suspended license; possession of a quantity of marijuana less than eight ounces; and possessing items classified by statute as drug paraphernalia.

IT IS ORDERED:

> 1) Respondent, James J. Prichard, Jr., is suspended from the practice of law for two years, which shall become effective with the entry of this order.

> 2) Respondent is directed to pay the costs of this action in the amount of $1,924.52.

> 3) Respondent shall comply with SCR 3.390 regarding notice to his clients of his suspension from the practice of law. Such notification shall be by letter duly placed in the United States mail within ten (10) days of the date of this order. Respondent shall simultaneously provide copies of all letters of notice to the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association.

This order shall be deemed a matter of public record.

ENTERED: September 30, 1993.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens ROBERT F. STEPHENS, Chief Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 743 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 743

   Honoring the life of Frank McCourt for his many contributions to 
              American literature, education, and culture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2009

Mr. Murphy of Connecticut (for himself and Mr. Courtney) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Honoring the life of Frank McCourt for his many contributions to 
              American literature, education, and culture.

Whereas Frank McCourt, a great American author, passed away on July 19, 2009;
Whereas Frank McCourt was born on August 19, 1930, in Brooklyn, New York;
Whereas Frank McCourt returned to his parents' homeland of Ireland during the 
        Great Depression where he remained until the age of 19;
Whereas Frank McCourt returned to the United States and served in the United 
        States Army where he was stationed in Germany during the Korean War;
Whereas following his service in the United States Army, Frank McCourt attended 
        New York University on the GI Bill despite never having attended high 
        school;
Whereas following his graduation from New York University, Frank McCourt began 
        teaching English and creative writing in the New York City Public School 
        system where he remained for 27 years;
Whereas Frank McCourt authored an autobiography titled ``Angela's Ashes'' which 
        vividly tells of the poverty, hunger, and alcoholism that challenged his 
        family and others in the town of Limerick, Ireland, where he grew up;
Whereas ``Angela's Ashes'' won the Pulitzer Prize for Biography, the National 
        Book Critics Circle Award, the ABBY Award among others, and has sold 
        over 4,000,000 copies, has been published in 27 countries, and has been 
        translated into 17 languages;
Whereas Frank McCourt also authored other award winning books including, 
        ``Tis'', the follow up to ``Angela's Ashes'', and ``Teacher Man'', about 
        his work in the New York School system;
Whereas his contributions to American literature, education, and culture have 
        impacted millions; and
Whereas Frank McCourt was beloved by his family, friends, and neighbors for his 
        kindness, wit, and generosity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the life of 
Frank McCourt for his many contributions to American literature, 
education, and culture.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13768]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Joint Development Venture Called ``VERSIT''

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 29, 1996, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), a Joint Development Venture 
called ``versit'' has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, the identity of the additional member of the venture is: 
Lucent Technologies Inc., Murray Hill, NJ.
    Organizations that are no longer versit members are: AT&T Corp., 
and Apple Computer, Inc.
    No other changes have been made in the membership, nature or 
objectives of the venture, and versit intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On January 26, 1995, versit filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 25, 1995 (60 FR 27787).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-13768 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, David L. Swift, President and Chief Executive Officer of Goodman Global, Inc. (the Registrant) and Lawrence M. Blackburn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the period covered by the
Periodic Report and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ David L. SwiftDavid L. Swift President and Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/ Lawrence M. BlackburnLawrence M. Blackburn Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 14, 2008