2802 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 1996 / Notices

adjustment shall be calculated in

accordance with Section II c(i) and (ii)

of the suspension agreement.

With respect to the use of duty

drawback, the Department verified that

the amount received was not in excess

of the import duties paid on physically

incorporated inputs. Thus, the

signatories were not in violation. (See

verification report dated June 1, 1995).

Finally, the participation in the

international trade promotion fund by

four signatories does not confer a benefit

because the Department verified that the

signatories paid their own expenses.

Furthermore, the Department has never

determined this program to be

countervailable.

Comment 2

ECS wants assurance that any benefits

found by the Department during the

period of review are repaid to the RTG

in order to reverse any benefits received

by the Thai yarn producers during the

POR.

Department’s Position

As stated above, the Department will

require that Thai Melon repay the

amount in which the tax certificate

exceeds the import duties on physically

incorporated inputs. If Thai Melon fails

to comply with this requirement, the

Department will have grounds to

determine that the signatory has

violated the agreement.

Comment 3

ECS urges the Department to maintain

close scrutiny over the administration of

the agreement so that the U.S. industry

can be assured that the subsidies found

by the Department will be repaid to the

RTG and that such benefits will not

continue in the future.

Department’s Position

The Department will continue to

closely monitor the administration of

the agreement in order to ensure that the

excess amount of the tax certificate is

repaid and that the signatories do not

receive any benefits in the future that

would constitute a violation of the

agreement.

Final Results of Review

For the period January 1, 1993

through December 31, 1993, we

determine that the signatories were not

in violation of the suspension

agreement.

This notice serves as a reminder to

parties subject to administrative

protective order (APO) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 C.F.R. 355.34(d). Timely written

notification of return/destruction of

APO materials or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with the regulations

and the terms of an APO is a

sanctionable violation.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)(1994))

and 19 CFR 3.5.5.22 (1994).

Dated: December 14, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 96–1455 Filed 1–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

U.S. Automotive Parts Advisory

Committee; Closed Meeting

AGENCY: International Trade

Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Closed meeting of U.S.

Automotive Parts Advisory Committee.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Automotive Parts

Advisory Committee (the ‘‘Committee’’)

advises U.S. Government officials on

matters relating to the implementation

of the Fair Trade in Auto Parts Act of

1988. The Committee: (1) reports

annually to the Secretary of Commerce

on barriers to sales of U.S.-made auto

parts and accessories in Japanese

markets; (2) assists the Secretary in

reporting to the Congress on the

progress of sales of U.S.-made auto parts

in Japanese markets, including the

formation of long-term supplier

relationships; (3) reviews and considers

data collected on sales of U.S.-made

auto parts to Japanese markets; (4)

advises the Secretary during

consultations with the Government of

Japan on these issues; and (5) assists in

establishing priorities for the

Department’s initiatives to increase

U.S.-made auto parts sales to Japanese

markets, and otherwise provide

assistance and direction to the Secretary

in carrying out these initiatives. At the

meeting, committee members will

discuss specific trade and sales

expansion programs related to U.S.-

Japan automotive parts policy.

DATES AND LOCATION: The meeting will

be held on February 22, 1996 from 10:00

a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the U.S. Department

of Commerce in Washington, D.C.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.

Robert Reck, Office of Automotive

Affairs, Trade Development, Room

4036, Washington, D.C. 20230,

telephone: (202) 482–1418.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Assistant Secretary for Administration,

with the concurrence of the General

Counsel formally determined on July 5,

1994, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the

Federal Advisory Act, as amended, that

the series of meetings or portions of

meetings of the Committee and of any

subcommittee thereof, dealing with

privileged or confidential commercial

information may be exempt from the

provisions of the Act relating to open

meeting and public participation therein

because these items are concerned with

matters that are within the purview of

5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (9) (B). A copy

of the Notice of Determination is

available for public inspection and

copying in the Department of Commerce

Records Inspection Facility, Room 6020,

Main Commerce.

Dated: January 22, 1996.

Henry P. Misisco,

Director, Office of Automotive Affairs.

[FR Doc. 96–1459 Filed 1–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 011796A]

North Pacific Fishery Management

Council; Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Pacific Northwest Crab

Industry Advisory Committee

(PNCIAC), an advisory committee to the

North Pacific Fishery Management

Council (Council) will hold a meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on

February 27, 1996, beginning at 9:00

a.m., and will end at approximately 5:00

p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

Leif Erikson Hall, 2245 NW 57th St,

Seattle, WA.

Council address: North Pacific

Fishery Management Council, 605 W.

4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK

99501–2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arni

Thomson, Alaska Crab Coalition, 206–

547–7560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

PNCIAC will review Alaska crab fishery

issues and proposed changes to current

regulations, and develop

recommendations to be forwarded to the

Alaska Board of Fisheries and the

Council.