alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. Scott BLAKELY, Individually and as President of Bluegrass Lodge No. 4, Fraternal Order of Police, Appellant, v. Don BLEVINS, Fayette County Clerk and Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Appellees.

No. 95-SC-811-I.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 23, 1996.

*379Stephen D. Wolnitzek, Covington, for Appellant.

Julius Rather, Lexington, Mary Ann Delaney, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Department of Law, Lexington, William H. McCann, H. Foster Pettitt, Penny R. Warren, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, Lexington, for Appellees.

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

Appellant sought to amend the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Charter [hereinafter Charter] to require the Urban County Council [hereinafter Council] to bargain collectively with the Fraternal Order of Police. Appellant presented the Fayette County Clerk, Don Blevins, with a petition pursuant to the requirements in Article 14 of the Charter. Blevins refused to place the proposed amendment on the ballot for the November, 1995, election. This refusal was based upon the Fayette Circuit Court decision in *Blevins v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government,*Civil Action No. 94-CI-2381.

Appellant then moved the Fayette Circuit Court for injunctive relief, requesting the proposed amendment be put on the ballot. Upon denial by the trial court, appellant moved for interlocutory relief from the Court of Appeals, which was denied as well. This Court also denied appellant’s motion for intermediate and interlocutory relief. Thereafter, this Court heard oral arguments on the merits of the proposed amendment.

Initially, we deny appellant’s CR 65.09 motion as there was no showing of irreparable harm. *Maupin v. Stansbury,*Ky.App., 575 S.W.2d 695 (1978). Appellant’s inability to place this proposed amendment on the November 1995 or 1996 ballot, does not rise to level of irreparable harm. Were appellant to prevail on the merits of his argument, the amendment could be placed on the ballot for the next election.

However, we now hold the proposed amendment to be an invalid attempt to amend the Charter because the Charter may only be amended as to the structure of urban county government. This finding is based upon the reasoning found in *Candler v. Blevins,*(95-SC-731), 922 S.W.2d 376 a case rendered this same date. Appellant urges this court to recognize his amendment as a “new plan or policy” of the Council instead of a limitation on the Council’s power. We do not agree with appellant’s characterization and therefore find appellant’s proposed amendment invalid.

All concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended July 15, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven R. Berrard, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 29, 2008 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27875-27876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13783]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 27876]]


FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for 
OMB review of the information collection system described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal without change in the substance or method 
of collection.
    Title: Notification of Performance of Bank Services.
    Form Number: FDIC 6120/06.
    OMB Number: 3064-0029.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: June 30, 1996.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management 
and Budget, OIRA, Paperwork Reduction Project (3064-0029), Washington, 
DC 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Steven F. Hanft, (202) 898-3907, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-400, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 
550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before July 3, 1996.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the submission may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above. Comments regarding the 
submission should be addressed to both the OMB reviewer and the FDIC 
contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Insured state nonmember banks are required 
to notify the FDIC, under section 7 of the Bank Service Corporation Act 
(12 U.S.C. 1867), of any relationship with a bank service corporation. 
The form FDIC 6120/06, Notification of Performance of Bank Services, 
may be used by banks to satisfy the notification requirement. In lieu 
of the form, a bank may satisfy the notification requirement by 
submitting a letter stating the name of the servicer, the address at 
which the service is being performed, the service being performed, and 
the date service commenced. According to the Bank Service Corporation 
Act, the service becomes subject to examination and regulation by 
federal bank regulatory agencies to the same extent as if the services 
were performed by the bank on its own premises.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Robert E. Feldman,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13783 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**









CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lightspace Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary Florindo, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Gary
                FlorindoGary
                FlorindoChief
                Executive Officer




November
      14, 2007






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lightspace Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Louis P. Nunes, Chief
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Louis
                P. NunesLouis
                P. NunesChief
                Accounting Officer




November
      14, 2007
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy O Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
officers of the Fund hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





RIDGEWOOD
      ENERGY O FUND, LLCDated:
            November
      9, 2009
            By:
            /s/
            
            ROBERT
      E. SWANSONName:
            
            Robert
      E. SwansonTitle:
            
            Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
            November
      9, 2009
            By:
            /s/
            
            KATHLEEN
      P. MCSHERRYName:
            
            Kathleen
      P. McSherryTitle:
            
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy O Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy O Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
---

Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




(ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




In
connection with the report of Dynegy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President
and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:
      February 25, 2010
            By:
            /s/    BRUCE A. WILLIAMSONBruce
      A. Williamson
              Chairman
      of the Board, President and Chief Executive
  Officer
#### In the Matter of Maurice Fredette, Petitioner, against Joseph P. Kelly, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Washington County,

October 22, 1956.

*John J. Heckman*for petitioner.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Edward Siegfried*and *Richard H. Shepp*of counsel), for respondent.

J. Clarence Herlihy, J.

This matter was brought on by way of motion and after examining the papers of the respective parties, the court directed that a hearing be held, which took place in the city of Glens Falls on September 6, 1956.

The court at the time of the hearing after listening to the proof concerning the arrest and plea in the town of Stillwater found that it was a valid arrest and conviction.

With reference to the hearings held before Judge Huggins, the first one on or about June 6, 1955 and the second on February 11, 1956, the court finds that there was not a proper compliance with section 335-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure in either of these arrests and convictions. The charge against the petitioner being criminal in nature, it is the duty of the People to strictly comply with this and the various other sections of the Penal Law.

The testimony of Judge Huggins himself is sufficient to uphold the position of the petitioner.

On page 29 of the testimony, he was asked the following question and made the following answer: “ Question. What did you tell him with reference to Section 335-a of the Criminal Code?

“ Answer. I read this down here at that time. I read this, oft after he pleaded guilty.”

This was in reference to the charge in June of 1955.

With reference to the charges on February 11, 1956, on page 34 of the testimony, he was asked the following question by the court and made the following answer:

> *515“ Q. What did you say to him about Section 335-a, if anything at all?

> ‘ ‘ A. The trooper had it all right. 1 told him to read it off. ’ ’

Without making any further observations concerning the proceedings, the court finds that the petitioner was not duly advised as to his rights and therefore, annuls and cancels the order of Honorable Joseph P. Kelly, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, revoking the driver’s license and certificate of registration of Maurice Fredette and orders that the commissioner return forthwith said license and certificate of registration of Maurice Fredette.

Submit order accordingly.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andrew J. SALES, Jr., Appellant.

No. 63362.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 21, 1993.

Andrew J. Sales, Jr., pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*673
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for sale of a controlled substance. We find no error of law and affirm Defendant’s conviction.

We further find an opinion in this matter would serve no jurisprudential purpose and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 27, 2013

p1120

Order 

Clerk

November 27, 2013

147213

THOMAS RAYMOND BENDER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147213

COA: 312987

Chippewa CC: 12-012107-AH

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

DIRECTOR,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cv-00309-DLR Document 17-1 Filed 05/29/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cv-00309-DLR Document 17-1 Filed 05/29/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14059]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Importer of Controlled Substances; Registration

    By Notice dated March 27, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 4, 1996, (61 FR 15121), Radian Corporation, 8501 
Mopac Blvd., PO Box 201088, Austin, Texas 78720, made application to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an 
importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug:                               Schedule        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ibogaine (7260)..............................  I                        
Etorphine (except HCL) (9056)................  I                        
Heroin (9200)................................  I                        
Cocaine (9041)...............................  II                       
Codeine (9050)...............................  II                       
Oxycodone (9143).............................  II                       
Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)    II                       
 (9273).                                                                
Morphine (9300)..............................  II                       
Thebaine (9333)..............................  II                       
Oxymorphone (9652)...........................  II                       
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Radian Corporation to import the 
listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and 
with United States obligations under international treaties, 
conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. 
Therefore, pursuant to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances 
Import and Export Act and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal 
Regulations, Sec. 1311.42, the above firm is granted registration as an 
importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above.

    Dated: May 23, 1996.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-14059 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of TransAsia Lawyers, PRC Counsel**

****February 28, 2008 

Sohu.com Inc. 

12/F Sohu.com Internet Plaza 

No. 1 Unit Zhongguancun East Road 

Haidian District 

Beijing 100084 

People’s Republic of China 

Dear Sirs, 

**Annual Report on Form 10-K for Year EndedDecember 31, 2007**

We hereby consent to the references to our firm under the heading “Government Regulation and Legal Uncertainties” inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Philip Qu

 

Philip Qu 

*Partner*
CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the interim report of Buck-A-Roo$ Holding Corporation. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, David Fox, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the
        Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial
        Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/
        David Fox
 David
        Fox
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 May
        15, 2008
 
 
 
 /s/
        Barry S. Baer
 Barry
        S. Baer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 May
        15, 2008
 
 24
H. Res. 342 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 28, 2009. 

Whereas the Library of Congress’ Asian Division together 

with many Vietnamese-American organizations across the 

United States will sponsor a ‘‘Journey to Freedom: A 

Boat People Retrospective’’ symposium on May 2, 2009; 

Whereas Vietnamese refugees were asylum-seekers from Communist-controlled Vietnam; 

Whereas many Vietnamese escaped in boats during the late 

1970s, after the Vietnam War and by land across the 

Cambodian, Laotian, and Thai borders into refugee 

camps in Thailand; 

Whereas over 2,000,000 Vietnamese boat people and other 

refugees are now spread across the world, in the United 

States, Australia, Canada, France, England, Germany, 

China, Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, the Philippines, 

and other nations; 

Whereas over half of all overseas Vietnamese are VietnameseAmericans, and Vietnamese-Americans are the fourthlargest Asian American group in the United States; 

Whereas, as of 2006, 72 percent of Vietnamese-Americans 

were naturalized United States citizens, the highest rate 

among all Asian groups; 
2 

•HRES 342 EH 

Whereas Vietnamese-Americans have made significant contributions to the rich culture and economic prosperity of 

the United States; 

Whereas Vietnamese-Americans have distinguished themselves in the fields of literature, the arts, science, and 

athletics, and include actors and actresses, physicists, an 

astronaut, and Olympic athletes; and 

Whereas May 2, 2009, would be an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘Vietnamese Refugees Day’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the designation of ‘‘Vietnamese Refugees Day’’ in order to 

commemorate the arrival of Vietnamese refugees in the 

United States, to document their harrowing experiences, and 

subsequent achievements in their new homeland, to honor the 

host countries that welcomed the boat people, and to recognize the voluntary agencies and nongovernmental organizations that facilitated their resettlement, adjustment, and assimilation into mainstream society in the United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.