alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31. 1


CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





I, Jervis B. Perkins certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of AeroGrow International Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date:  August 19, 2009
By:
/s/ Jervis B. PerkinsJervis B. PerkinsChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1397]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy


Federal Energy Management and Planning Programs; Energy Savings 
Performance Contract Model Solicitations

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy gives notice of an extension of the 
comment period for the summary of proposed changes to its energy 
savings performance contracting model solicitations. The Notice and 
invitation to comment on the summary of proposed changes to the model 
solicitations was published in the Federal Register on December 27, 
1995 (60 FR 66961). In response to requests from the public, the 
Department is extending the comment period.

DATES: Comments should be received no later than March 1, 1996.

ADDRESSES: All written comments are to be submitted to: U.S. Department 
of Energy, Office of Federal Energy Management Programs, EE-92, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20595-0121. Fax and e-mail 
comments will be accepted at (202) 586-3000 and 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93e7f2fdeaf2bde0f2f7fff6e1d3fbe2bdf7fcf6bdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec988d82958dc29f8d8880899eac849dc2888389c28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>, respectively.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya Sadler, EE-92, U.S. Department 
of Energy, Office of Federal Energy Management Programs, EE-92, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121, (202) 586-7755.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on this 22nd day of January 1996.
Brian T. Castelli,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 96-1397 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB/A for the period ending October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandro Natale, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that;





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
                February 8, 2008
            /s/
                Sandro NataleSandro
                NataleChief
                Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13326]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 29, 1996 / 
Notices

[[Page 26873]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Availability for Licensing and Intent To Grant 
Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Availability and Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 
08/005,722, ``Insect Monitoring Trap,'' filed January 19, 1993, is 
available for licensing and that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant an exclusive license to 
Consep, Inc. of Bend, Oregon.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 27, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
Room 415, Building 005, BARC-West, Baltimore Boulevard, Beltsville, 
Maryland 20705-2350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Consep, Inc. has submitted a 
complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective 
exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the 
terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective 
exclusive license may be granted unless, within ninety days from the 
date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service 
receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant 
of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
R.M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-13326 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Jesus Alvarado-Ruiz, et al.,

Defendant.

NO. 18-01101MJ

MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER OF 

DETENTION

Defendant, Jesus Alvarado-Ruiz, et al., having been charged in the District of 

Arizona with a violation of Count One of Title 8 United States Code Section 

1324(a)(1)(A)(ii)(B)(i) and Count Two of Title 8 United States Code Section 

1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)(v)(I) and the Magistrate Judge having determined from the affidavit of 

the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection filed in this case, 

the following persons can provide testimony that is material to the offense(s) alleged in 

the complaint:

Guillermo Gonzalez-Islas

Dayami Osorio-Ortiz

The Magistrate Judge finds that it may become impracticable to secure the 

presence of the witness(es) by subpoena in further proceedings because they are not in 

the United States legally and have no legal residence or employment in this Country.

IT IS ORDERED that the witness(es) shall be detained pursuant to 18 USC ' 3144 

in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or 
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The witness(es) shall be 

afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

Dated this 5th day of February, 2018.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6803

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD EDISON BOYD, a/k/a Jake Boyd,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting

by designation. (CR-92-383, CA-95-3774-MJG)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Edison Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Jefferson McClure Gray,

OBER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

CORRECTED OPINION
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Boyd, Nos. CR-92-

383; CA-95-3774-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Kim Cramton, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Grabbagreen Franchising LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-17-04663-PHX-DWL

ORDER 

Grabbagreen Franchising LLC, et al.,

Counterclaimants, 

v. 

Kim Cramton and Laura McCormack, 

Counterdefendants. 

IT IS ORDERED granting the Ex Parte Application for Withdrawal of Counsel by 

Defendants/Counterclaimants Grabbagreen Franchising, LLC, Eat Clean Operations, LLC, 

Eat Clean Holdings, LLC, Gulf Girl Squared, Inc., Kelli Newman, and Keely Newman 

(Doc. 135). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP and 

attorneys Jay A. Zweig, Melissa R. Costello, and Julie Birk are withdrawn as counsel of 

record for Defendants/Counterclaimants. 

... 

Case 2:17-cv-04663-DWL Document 140 Filed 02/26/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tiffany & Bosco PA shall give prompt notice 

of the entry of this Order to all other parties or their attorneys. 

 Dated this 25th day of February, 2019. 

Case 2:17-cv-04663-DWL Document 140 Filed 02/26/19 Page 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATION      OF LARRY POWALISZ**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 13, 2008 |
|-----------------------------------|

| /s/                Larry Powalisz           |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry                Powalisz               |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer and  |   |
| Principal                Accounting Officer |   |

----
#### Glenn Samuel COLLINS, III, Petitioner, v. Dana Lynn COLLINS, Respondent.

No. 95-0803.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Feb. 9, 1996.

Rehearing Overruled April 4, 1996.

J. Ken Nunley, Boerne, Richard R. Orsinger, Thomas Black, San Antonio, for petitioner.

Maurice Bresenhan, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The court of appeals holds, in part, that the trial court erred in allowing two witnesses to testify to the market value of a corporation, of which they were the principal managers and sole stockholders, because they did not supplement their deposition testimony in which each stated that he did not plan to testify at trial about the value of the corporation. 904 S.W.2d 792, 799-802. Unlike the dissenting justices in the court of appeals, we do not read the court of appeals’ opinion so broadly as to require supplementation of a fact witness’ deposition testimony generally, or in any situation other than when a witness renders an expert opinion. *See id.*at 806-08 (Hedges, J., dissenting). With this understanding, we deny the applications for writ of error.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Tempe Hospitality Ventures LLC, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-18-00452-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 The Court previously stayed this matter and all other matters filed by Plaintiff 

pending the Ninth Circuit’s resolution of Plaintiff’s appeal in Gastelum v. Canyon 

Hospitality LLC, No. 18-16032 (9th Cir. filed June 5, 2018). (Doc. 22.) The Ninth Circuit 

dismissed that appeal on September 14, 2018. The Court will therefore lift the stay in this 

matter, as well as in the remaining separate matters Plaintiff has brought before it, the 

others to be addressed by separate respective Orders. 

 Because the Court already entered judgment in this matter (Doc. 15) and no 

motions are pending, the matter remains closed. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED lifting the stay in this matter. The matter remains 

closed. 

 Dated this 28th day of November, 2018. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00452-JJT Document 25 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Billy G. NIMROD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41063.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 11, 1989.

Billy G. Nimrod, Pacific, pro se.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and SHANGLER and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Albert Mitchell, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-17-04629-PHX-DLR 

ORDER 

 The Court has reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Amend Case Caption and 

Dismiss Defendant. (Doc. 15.) For good cause shown, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation to Amend Case Caption and Dismiss 

Defendant is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case caption be amended to show LM 

General Insurance Company as the named Defendant. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance 

Company is dismissed from the action with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and 

costs. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 2:17-cv-04629-DLR Document 16 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to amend the case 

caption to include Defendant LM General Insurance Company. 

 Dated this 6th day of March, 2018. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:17-cv-04629-DLR Document 16 Filed 03/07/18 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 635 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 635

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 13, 2009.
Whereas M. Pope Barrow, Jr., was appointed to the Office of the Legislative 
        Counsel of the House of Representatives in 1968;
Whereas M. Pope Barrow, Jr., has provided 40 years of service to the House as a 
        member of the Office of the Legislative Counsel under eight successive 
        Speakers;
Whereas M. Pope Barrow, Jr., has served as the Legislative Counsel for 12 years, 
        following his service as the Deputy Legislative Counsel for 4 years;
Whereas M. Pope Barrow, Jr., has been the principal drafter over the past 30 
        years of Federal laws that protect the environment, preserve public 
        lands and waterways, and promote the production and efficient use of 
        energy resources;
Whereas M. Pope Barrow, Jr., has provided exemplary leadership in undertaking 
        significant programs to modernize the operations of the Office of the 
        Legislative Counsel and the House; and
Whereas M. Pope Barrow, Jr., has provided steady guidance in continuing the 
        professional, nonpartisan service to which the Office of the Legislative 
        Counsel is dedicated: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its gratitude to--
            (1) M. Pope Barrow, Jr., for his 40 years of service to the House; 
        and
            (2) the Office of the Legislative Counsel for its more than 90 years 
        of assistance in the drafting of legislation considered by the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, on the 10th day of November 1999, H Bar
C, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Maker"), hereby covenants
and promises to pay Richard Stahl ("Payee"), or order, at
Payee's address as Payee may designate in writing, Twelve
Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-Five ($12,455.00) Dollars lawful
money of the United States of America, which principal shall be
payable, with interest at the annual rate of Ten (10%) percent.

Maker covenants and agrees with Payee as follows:

1.  Maker will pay the indebtedness, or any additional
indebtedness, evidenced by this Note, or further Note, as
provided herein.

2.  Maker shall have the right to prepay the indebtedness
evidenced by this Note, in whole or in part, without penalty,
upon ten days prior written notice to Payee.

3.  This Note shall become due and payable in full within
one (1) year from the date of this Note.

4.  Maker, and all guarantors, endorsers, and sureties of
this Note, hereby waive presentment for payment, demand,
protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and notice of
dishonor of this Note.  Maker, and all guarantors, endorsers,
and sureties consent that Payee at any time may extend the time
of payment or al or any part of the indebtedness secured hereby,
or may grant any other indulgences.  The obligations of the
parties which comprise the Maker hereunder shall be joint and
several obligations of such parties.

5.  Any notice or demand required or permitted to be made
or given hereunder shall be deemed sufficiently made and given
if given by personal service or by the mailing of such notice or
demand by certified or registered mail, return-receipt
requested, addressed, if to the Maker, at Maker's address or if
to Payee, at Payee's address.  Either party may change its
address by the like notice to the other party.

6.  This Note may not be changed or terminated orally, but
only by an agreement in writing signed by the party against whom
enforcement or any change modification, termination, waiver, or
discharge is sought.  In the event that any legal action is
required to enforce this Note, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses.
This Note shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and the Payee have executed this
Note and Agreement as of the date first above written.


/s/  Edward Toscano                          /s/  Richard Stahl
Edward Toscano, President, Maker             Richard Stahl, Payee