alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13509]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-64-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Refund Report

May 23, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 20, 1996, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) submitted worksheets reflecting the distribution of refunds 
paid to jurisdictional sales customers on May 20, 1996.
    Northern states that these refunds are being made pursuant to the 
Commission's Order in Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Docket Nos. 
GP83-11-002 and RI83-9-003 issued December 1, 1993.
    The Commission ordered that ``any first seller that collected 
revenues in excess of the applicable maximum lawful price established 
by the NGPA as a result of the reimbursement of the Kansas ad valorem 
taxes for sales on or after June 28, 1988, shall refund any such excess 
revenues to the purchaser'' * * *''. The Interstate pipelines were then 
required to make lump-sum cash payments of the Kansas ad valorem tax 
refunds to the customers who were actually overcharged. Included with 
Northern's payments is interest covering the period from the date 
Northern received the refund from the producer until May 20, 1996.
    Northern states that a copy of this report is being mailed to each 
of Northern's affected jurisdictional sales customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must be filed on 
or before May 31, 1996. All protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken in this 
proceeding, but will not serve to make Protestant a party to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13509 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29103-29104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14389]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary


Findings of Scientific Misconduct

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity 
(ORI) has made final findings of scientific misconduct in the following 
case:
    Eric T. Fossel, Ph.D., Harvard Medical School: Based on ORI's 
analysis of the relevant evidence and conclusions submitted by the 
Harvard Medical

[[Page 29104]]

School Committee on Faculty Conduct, ORI found that Eric T. Fossel, 
Ph.D., former Harvard Medical School Associate Professor of Radiology 
at Beth Israel Hospital, committed scientific misconduct by reporting 
falsified research results in a Public Health Service (PHS) grant 
application.
    Specifically, Dr. Fossel altered nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 
data in the Multicenter Breast Trial (MCBT) such that the NMR test, 
purporting to detect from a patient's blood sample a predisposition 
toward malignancy or a relapse, appeared to be more accurate, 
sensitive, and specific than was actually the case. Premised on these 
falsely reported results, Dr. Fossel proposed in a PHS grant 
application that the National Cancer Institute provide funds to 
complete the MCBT.
    Dr. Fossel has entered into a Voluntary Exclusion Agreement with 
ORI in which he has voluntarily agreed, for the three (3) year period 
beginning May 9, 1996, to exclude himself from:
    (1) any contracting or subcontracting with any agency of the United 
States Government and from eligibility for, or involvement in, 
nonprocurement transactions (e.g., grants and cooperative agreements) 
of the United States Government as defined in 45 CFR Part 76 (Debarment 
Regulations), and
    (2) serving in any advisory capacity to PHS, including but not 
limited to service on any PHS advisory committee, board, and/or peer 
review committee, or as a consultant.
    No scientific publications were required to be corrected as part of 
this Agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Research 
Investigations, Office of Research Integrity, 5515 Security Lane, Suite 
700, Rockville, MD 20852.
Chris B. Pascal,
Acting Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 96-14389 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 1, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00539

- CV

IN RE TIME WARNER CA BLE ENTERPRISES , LLC

and Luquita Joy

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Ba rnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

On August 31, 2015, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

emergency relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus

relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and

the real party in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this

court no later than September 15, 2015. Any such response must conform to Tex as Rule of

Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator s ’ request for emergency relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s August 21, 2015

order authorizing the oral deposition of L uquita Joy to occur not later than September 4, 2015, is

TEMPORARILY STAYED pending furth er order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on September 1, 2015

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 09313 , styled In re Fernand o Ozuna , pending in the 285th

Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Golden Opportunities
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10 Q for the year ended October
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael A.
Zahorik,  Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
certify that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
December 11, 2008





/s/Michael A. ZahorikMichael
      A. ZahorikChairman and Chief Financial
  Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13478]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 1

RIN 2900-AI09


Gender Policy for VA Publications and Other Communications

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document amends regulations of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs (VA) by removing Sec. 1.13 of 38 CFR. This section provided 
that VA publications and other communications must avoid using language 
refering only to the masculine gender when the feminine gender also was 
intended to be included. This guidance was intended to avoid any 
incorrect appearance of seeming to preclude benefits for female 
veterans, dependents, or beneficiaries. Although, VA is fully committed 
to the gender-neutral concepts that were set forth in Sec. 1.13, the 
material from Sec. 1.13 is removed since the mandate from that section 
is being accomplished through internal issuances.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Hoffman, Director, Information 
Resources Management, Policy and Standards Service (045A3), Department 
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, 
(202) 273-8129.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule consists of nonsubstantive 
changes and, therefore, is not subject to the notice and comment and 
effective date provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553.
    The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5. U.S.C. 
601-602. This final rule would not cause a significant effect on any 
entities since it does not contain any substantive provisions. 
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment is exempt from 
the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 
sections 603 and 604.
    There are no Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers 
for this regulation.

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1

    Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Freedom of 
information, Government contracts, Government employees, Government 
property, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Approved: May 13, 1996.
Jesse Brown,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 1 is amended 
as set forth below:

PART 1--GENERAL PROVISIONS

    1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.


Sec. 1.131   [Removed]

    2. The undesignated centerheading preceding Sec. 1.13 and Sec. 1.13 
are removed.

[FR Doc. 96-13478 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6430

LORENZO V. CARRILLO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. WILLETT, Assistant Commonwealth’s

Attorney; ROBERT W. BOWEN, Police Officer;

RICHARD JENKINS, Police Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-173-2)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo V. Carrillo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo V. Carrillo, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Carrillo v. Willett, No. CA-98-

173-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandro Natale, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
      January 15, 2009
              /s/ Sandro NataleSandro
      NataleChief
      Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 15, 2006
    /s/ Vincent R. Volpe Jr.Vincent R. Volpe Jr.President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director Page 34 of 35
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14196]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP96-211-000, RP95-197-010 and RP95-197-011]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Technical 
Conference

May 31, 1996.
    In the Commission's order issued on May 29, 1996, in the above-
captioned proceeding, the Commission held that the filing raises issues 
for which a technical conference is to be convened.
    The conference to address the issues has been scheduled for 
Tuesday, June 11, 1996, at 10:00 a.m. in a room to be designated at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14196 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Luther VANDERBURG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 218-93.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

April 20, 1994.

Jerome Godinich, Jr., Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Mary Lou Keel and Stephen Harpold, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*OPINION ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of criminal trespass and the trial court sentenced *684him to thirty days confinement in the county jail. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and rendered a judgment of acquittal. *Vanderburg v. State,*843 S.W.2d 286 (Tex.App.1992). The State filed a petition for discretionary review alleging that the Court of Appeals erred in holding proof of a greater right of possession in the complainant is not sufficient to support a conviction for criminal trespass.

The facts of this case are almost identical to those in our recent opinion of *Arnold v. State,*867 S.W.2d 378 (Tex.Cr.App.1993), in which this Court held that “in criminal trespass cases where the State alleges ownership ... the State may establish ownership by proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the complainant had a greater right to possession of the property than the defendant.” *Id.*at 379. See also, *Langston v. State,*855 S.W.2d 718, 721 at n. 7 (Tex.Cr.App.1993).

The Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of our recent opinion in *Arnold.*Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is summarily reversed and the case is remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of *Arnold.*
1 WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

1 O United States of America, No. 18-04000MJ-001-PCT-DMF 

11 Plaintiff, ORDER 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

v. 

Tyson Watahomigie, Sr., 

Defendant. 

Defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. § 3141 et. seq. a 

detention hearing was held. The defendant is ordered detained pending an intake 

assessment for ·placement at Crossroads in Phoenix, Arizona or other , facility as 

designated by Pretrial Services. Should defendant qualify for such placement, defendant 

shall be released upon conditions set by this Court, including pretrial residency at said 

facility, as conditions do exist which would reasonably assure the safety of others and the 

appearance of the defendant. Should defendant not so qualify, the release conditions set 

by this Court shall be vacated and defendant shall be detained pending trial as there are 

no conditions or combination of conditions which would reasonably assure the safety of 

others or the appearance of the defendant. 

The Pretrial Services Officer is ordered to timely notify this Court of the 

defendant's intake assessment results, and if found acceptable, the date and time the 

II 
1 facility will provide transportation from the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse for the 

2 defendant. 

3 Dated this 1st day of February, 2018. 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 -
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 599 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 599

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 22, 2009.
Whereas, since September 21, 1959, Minute Man National Historical Park has 
        preserved key sites where the first battles of the American 
        Revolutionary War occurred, and educated millions of Americans about the 
        extraordinary events that led to the birth of the Nation and the ideals 
        embodied in those courageous actions;
Whereas Minute Man National Historical Park encompasses more than 1,000 acres in 
        the historic communities of Lexington, Lincoln, and Concord that were at 
        the center of the American Revolution;
Whereas the events, places, and people recognized by the Minute Man National 
        Historical Park have become enduring testaments to American values and 
        are among the most celebrated and cherished symbols in the history of 
        the Nation;
Whereas the Minute Man National Historical Park includes multiple sites and 
        landscapes along the route from Boston to Concord, known as the Battle 
        Road, where American Militia and British soldiers fought numerous times 
        on April 19, 1775;
Whereas American militia were first ordered to return British fire at Concord's 
        North Bridge, a heroic action commemorated by American poet Ralph Waldo 
        Emerson in his poem ``The Concord Hymn'' as the ``shot heard 'round the 
        world'';
Whereas the park celebrates Paul Revere's legendary ``midnight ride'' of April 
        18, 1775, to warn American colonists that British soldiers were marching 
        to Concord to destroy key military stores; and
Whereas more than one million Americans from States across the Nation and people 
        from around the globe visit Minute Man National Historical Park every 
        year to learn about the role that these New England communities played 
        in the American Revolution: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) Minute Man National Historical Park serves an essential role in 
        preserving the sites and landscapes in New England where the American 
        Revolution began, and in educating the public about these historic 
        events;
            (2) Minute Man National Historical Park honors and commemorates the 
        ideals of democracy, liberty, and freedom that are the foundation of the 
        Nation and sources of inspiration for people everywhere; and
            (3) the creation of Minute Man National Historical Park 50 years ago 
        represents a remarkable achievement that continues to benefit Americans 
        around the Nation, to preserve the proud legacy of the American 
        Revolution, and to serve as an enduring resource for future generations.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26180-26181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13133]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act, including whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a hearing 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal. Unless 
otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 17, 1996.

[[Page 26181]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Fortress Bancshares, Inc., Cresco, Iowa; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Fortress Bank of Cresco, Cresco, Iowa (in organization).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 20, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-13133 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F