29344 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices

days after the date of publication, or the

first workday thereafter. Case briefs and/

or written comments from interested

parties may be submitted not later than

30 days after the date of publication.

Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written

comments, limited to issues raised in

the case briefs and comments, may be

filed not later than 37 days after the date

of publication. Parties who submit

arguments in this proceeding are

requested to submit with each argument

(1) a statement of the issue and (2) a

brief summary of the argument. The

Department will issue the final results

of the administrative review, including

the results of its analysis of issues raised

in any such written comments or at a

hearing, within 120 days of issuance of

these preliminary results.

The Department shall determine, and

Customs shall assess, antidumping

duties on all appropriate entries.

Individual differences between USP and

NV may vary from the percentage stated

above. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

Customs. The final results of this review

shall be the basis for the assessment of

antidumping dumping duties on entries

of merchandise covered by the

determination and for future deposits of

estimated duties.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective upon

completion of the final results of this

administrative review for all shipments

of pure magnesium from Canada

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of the final results of

this administrative review, as provided

by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The

cash deposit rate for NHCI will be the

rate established in the final results of

administrative review; (2) for

merchandise exported by manufacturers

or exporters not covered in this review

but covered in the original less than fair

value (LTFV) investigation or a previous

review, the cash deposit will continue

to be the most recent rate published in

the final determination or final results

for which the manufacturer or exporter

received a company-specific rate; (3) if

the exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, or the original investigation, but

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit

rate will be that established for the

manufacturer of the merchandise in the

final results of this review or the LTFV

investigation; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this or any previous review,

the cash deposit rate will be 21 percent,

the ‘‘all others’’ rate established in Pure

Magnesium From Canada: Amendment

of Final Determination of Sales At Less

Than Fair Value and Order in

Accordance With Decision on Remand,

58 FR 62643, November 29, 1993.

This notice also serves as a

preliminary reminder to importers of

their responsibility to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during this

review period. Failure to comply with

this requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19

CFR 353.22.

Dated: May 29, 1996.

Paul L. Joffe,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 96–14619 Filed 6–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–588–046]

Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan;

Final Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

SUMMARY: On April 5, 1996, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the preliminary

results of administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on

polychloroprene rubber (rubber) from

Japan. The review covers six

manufacturers/exporters of the subject

merchandise to the United States for the

period December 1, 1993, through

November 30, 1994. These

manufacturers/exporters are Denki

Kaguku, K.K. (Denki), Denki/Hoei

Sangyo Co., Ltd. (Denki/Hoei Sangyo),

Mitsui Bussan K.K. (Mitsui Bussan),

Suzugo Corporation (Suzugo), Tosoh

Corporation (Tosoh) (formerly Toyo

Soda), and Tosoh/Hoei Sangyo Co., Ltd.

(Tosoh/Hoei Sangyo).

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to submit oral or written

comments on the preliminary results of

review. We received no comments.

Based on our analysis, these final results

of review are unchanged from those

presented in our preliminary results of

review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 10, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy

F. Unger, Jr. or Thomas Futtner, Office

of Antidumping Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–0651 or 482–3814.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On April 5, 1996, the Department

published in the Federal Register (61

FR 15222) the preliminary results of

administrative review of the

antidumping finding on rubber from

Japan. The Department has now

conducted that administrative review in

accordance with section 751 of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the

Tariff Act).

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute and to the

Department’s regulations refer to the

provisions as they existed on December

31, 1994.

Scope of the Review

Imports covered by the review are

shipments of polychloroprene rubber,

an oil resistant synthetic rubber also

known as polymerized chlorobutadiene

or neoprene, currently classifiable under

items 4002.42.00, 4002.49.00,

4003.00.00, 4462.15.21 and 4462.00.00.

HTS item numbers are provided for

convenience and for Customs purposes.

The written descriptions remain

dispositive.

Final Results of Review

We were unable to locate the

following companies, Denki/Hoei

Sangyo, Suzugo, and Tosoh/Hoei

Sangyo, in spite of requests for

assistance from various sources

including the American Embassy in

Tokyo, the Japanese Embassy in

Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Customs

Service. Therefore, we were unable to

conduct administrative reviews for

these firms, and upon issuance of these

final results we will instruct the U.S.

Customs Service to continue to assess

any entries by these firms at the rate

determined by the last completed

administrative review on November 26,

1984 (49 FR 46454). See Certain Fresh

Cut Flowers from Colombia; Preliminary

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review, Partial

Termination of Administrative Reviews,

and Notice of Intent to Revoke Order (In

Part) (Flowers from Colombia), 60 FR

30271 (June 8, 1995)).

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on the

preliminary results of review. The

Department received no written
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices 29345

comments or requests for a hearing.

Based on our analysis, these final results

of review are the same as those

presented in the preliminary results of

review, and we determine that the

following margins for the companies

exist for the period December 1, 1993,

through November 30, 1994:

Manufacturer/Producer/Exporter Percent

Margin

Denki ......................................... 10.00

Mitsui Bussan ........................... 10.00

Tosoh ........................................ 10.00

1 No shipments during the POR. Rate is

from the last administrative review in which

there were shipments.

The U.S. Customs Service shall assess

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. Individual differences between

United States Price (USP) and Foreign

Market Value (FMV) may vary from the

percentages stated above. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions concerning each

respondent directly to the U.S. Customs

Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of the subject merchandise,

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of these final results of

administrative review, as provided for

by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1)

The cash deposit rate for Denki, Mitsui

Bussan, and Tosoh will be zero percent;

(2) for previously reviewed or

investigated companies not listed above,

the cash deposit rate will continue to be

the company-specific rate published for

the most recent period; (3) if the

exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, a prior review, or in the original

LTFV investigation, but the

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate

will be the rate established for the most

recent period for the manufacturer of

the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit

rate for Denki/Hoei Sangyo, Suzugo, and

Tosoh/Hoei Sangyo will be the rate

determined by the last completed

administrative review on November 26,

1984 (49 FR 46454); and (5) if neither

the exporter nor the manufacturer is a

firm covered in this or any previous

review conducted by the Department,

the cash deposit rate will be the ‘‘all

others’’ rate established in the LTFV

investigation.

These deposit requirements shall

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

This notice serves as the final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (APO) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written

notification or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with the regulations

and the terms of the APO is a

sanctionable violation.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1))

and 19 CFR 353.22.

Dated May 31, 1996.

Paul L. Joffe,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 96–14622 Filed 6–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–570–601]

Final Court Decision and Amended

Final Results: 1989–90 Administrative

Review of Tapered Roller Bearings and

Parts Thereof from the People’s

Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 10, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John Beck, Office of Antidumping

Investigations, Import Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)

482–3464.

Summary:

On February 27, 1996, in the case of

UCF America Inc. and Universal

Automotive Co. Ltd. v. United States

and the Timken Company, Cons. Ct. No.

92–01–00049, Slip Op. 96–42 (UCF), the

United States Court of International

Trade (the Court) affirmed the

Department of Commerce’s (the

Department’s) results of redetermination

on remand of the Final Results of Sales

at Less Than Fair Value: 1989–1990

Administrative Review of Tapered

Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof from

the People’s Republic of China. As there

is now a final and conclusive court

decision in this action, we are amending

our final results in this matter and will

instruct the U.S. Customs Service to

change the cash deposit and assessment

rates accordingly.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

During 1987, the Department

completed its investigation of tapered

roller bearings from the People’s

Republic of China (Final Determination

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:

Tapered Roller Bearings From the

People’s Republic of China (52 FR

19748, May 27, 1987)). In addition to

setting a rate for Premier Bearing (a

Hong Kong trading company), the

Department issued an ‘‘all others’’ rate

of 0.97 percent.

Subsequently, interested parties

challenged the final determination. The

Court remanded the case and, on

February 26, 1990, the Department

issued an amendment to the final

determination (Amendment to Final

Determination of Sales at Less Than

Fair Value and Antidumping Duty

Order in Accordance With Decision

Upon Remand: Tapered Roller Bearings

From the People’s Republic of China (55

FR 6669, Feb. 26, 1990)). In its

amendment, the Department issued a

new ‘‘all others’’ rate of 2.96 percent.

On July 26, 1990, the Department

initiated the third administrative review

of tapered roller bearings from the

People’s Republic of China, covering the

period June 1, 1989 through May 31,

1990 (Initiation of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Reviews (55 FR 30490,

July 26, 1990)). The Department

initiated on CMEC (a state trading

company) and Premier.

In 1991, the Department established a

new policy concerning non-market

economies. Under this policy, all nonmarket economy exporters are presumed

to be a single enterprise controlled by

the central government, which receives

a single rate (the ‘‘PRC rate’’) (see the

Final Determination of Sales At Less

Than Fair Value: Heavy Forged Hand

Tools, Finished or Unfinished, With or

Without Handles, From the People’s

Republic of China (56 FR 241, Jan. 3,

1991); and Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review: Iron Construction Castings from

the People’s Republic of China (56 FR

2742, Jan. 24, 1991)). A company is

entitled to a separate rate only if it

establishes that it is not subject to de

jure or de facto control by the central

government (see the the Final

Determination of Sales at Less Than

Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the