alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12589]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, the National Center for Health 
Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 
announces the following committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS).
    Times and Dates: 9 a.m.-5 p.m., June 5, 1996; 9 a.m.-5 p.m., 
June 6, 1996.
    Place: Room 503A, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The Committee will receive an update on the 
Department's performance partnership program, current privacy 
legislation activities, and other departmental data collection 
efforts. The Committee will also discuss its core health data 
elements project and other aspects of the NCVHS charge.
    Notice: In the interest of security, the Department has 
instituted stringent procedures for entrance to the Hubert H. 
Humphrey Building by non-government employees. Thus, persons without 
a government identification card should plan to arrive at the 
building each day either between 8:30 and 9 a.m. or 12:30 and 1 p.m. 
so they can be escorted to the meeting. Entrance to the meeting at 
other times during the day cannot be assured.
    Contact Person for More Information: Substantive program 
information as well as summaries of the meeting and a roster of 
committee members may be obtained from Gail F. Fisher, Ph.D., 
Executive Secretary, NCVHS, NCHS, CDC, Room 1100, Presidential 
Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone 
301/436-7050.

    Dated: May 14, 1996.
Nancy C. Hirsch,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 96-12589 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF BROADVIEW NETWORKS HOLDINGS, INC.
 Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, owns, directly or indirectly, the following subsidiaries:
 State or Jurisdiction ofName of Subsidiary
    
    Incorporation or OrganizationBroadview Networks, Inc.
    
    New YorkBV-BC Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareBroadview NP Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareOpen Support Systems LLC
    
    ConnecticutBroadview Networks of Virginia, Inc.
    
    VirginiaBroadview Networks of Massachusetts, Inc.
    
    DelawareBridgecom Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareBridgecom International, Inc.
    
    DelawareBridgecom Solutions Group, Inc.
    
    DelawareTrucom Corporation
    
    New YorkATX Communications, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoreComm-ATX, Inc.
    
    DelawareATX Licensing, Inc.
    
    DelawareATX Telecommunications Services of Virginia, LLC
    
    DelawareCoreComm Services, LLC
    
    DelawareCoreComm Communications, LLC
    
    DelawareCCL Historical, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoreComm Newco, Inc.
    
    DelawareFCC Holdco I, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoreComm-Voyager, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoreComm Internet Group, Inc.
    
    DelawareVoyager Information Networks, Inc.
    
    MichiganVoyager Data Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Illinois, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Indiana, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Maryland, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Massachusetts, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Michigan, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Missouri, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical New Jersey, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical New York, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Ohio, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Rhode Island, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Vermont, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical West Virginia, Inc.
    
    DelawareCCL Historical Pennsylvania, Inc.
    
    DelawareCortelyou Communications Corp.
    
    DelawareDigicom, Inc.
    
    OhioEureka Broadband Corporation
    
    DelawareEureka Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareEureka Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareEureka Telecom of VA, Inc.
    
    VirginiaEureka Telecom, Inc.
    
    New YorkEureka Networks, LLC
    
    DelawareNex-i.com, Inc.
    
    New JerseyInfoHighway Communications Corporation
    
    DelawareInfo-Highway International, Inc.
    
    TexasARC Networks, Inc.
    
    DelawareA.R.C. Networks, Inc.
    
    New YorkInfoHighway of Virginia, Inc.
    
    Virginia
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 16, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40297 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DANIEL CASTILLO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-178-4

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Daniel Castillo-Martinez appeals his guilty plea convictions and 210-month sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine and more than 50 grams of methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine. He argues that the district court clearly erred in determining that he was not entitled to a U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) reduction in his offense level for a minor role in the offense. Because Castillo-MartinezNo. 06-40297 -2- twice transported a large amount of drugs from Mexico to the United States and his role of transporting the drugs was important to the success of the overall drug venture, he has not shown that the district court clearly erred in determining that he was not a minor participant under § 3B1.2. See United States
v. Franco-Torres , 869 F.2d 797, 801 (5th Cir. 1989). Castillo-Martinez argues that in view of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to his case. As he concedes, this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580, 581-82 (5th Cir. 2000). Castillo-Martinez argues, and the Government concedes, that the judgment erroneously states that Castillo-Martinez was convicted of aiding and abetting in the possession convictions. Because the theory of aiding and abetting was not submitted to the jury, the case is remanded for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to correct the judgment by omitting the reference to 18 U.S.C. § 2. See F ED . R. CRIM . P. 36; United States v. Eakes 783 F.2d 499, 507 (5th Cir. 1986).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR LIMITED PURPOSE OF CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR IN JUDGMENT.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

FILED 

RECEIVED - LODGED -i-=--!.!=~~--==~Copy 

JUN 1 1 2019 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, No. CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC(DTF) 

Plaintiff, 

RETURN OF -EXHIBITS 

v. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant. 

14 Receipt is hereby acknowledged for the exhibits submitted and or admitted during the Jury 

15 Trial' conducted 5/29/2019 through 6/7/2019. 

16 

17 201,202,203A,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,220,233,234,235,239,24~246 

18 and 247. 

19 

20 

21 

\ 

_ 22 Exhibits shall be kept in my/our possession until all appeal time has run in this matter o; 

23 until further Order of the Court. 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: rJ (t / ~ . By: 

Gregory Kuykendall/Amy Knight 

Defense Coun~el Signature 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 278 Filed 06/11/19 Page 1 of 1
#### James Michael SULLIVAN, by next friend Patricia Ann SULLIVAN, Respondents, v. Gerald T. JORDAN, Appellant.

No. WD 51587.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 11, 1996.

*525Richard N. Brown, Brookfield, for appellant.

Jackie L. Bailey, Marceline, for respondents.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and HANNA and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from trial court’s judgment in paternity action and award of child support, reimbursement of past reasonable necessary expenses and attorney fees.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Dannelle Clark, et al., 

Defendant. 

NO. 18-01100MJ 

MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER OF 

DETENTION 

 Defendant, Dannelle Clark, et al., having been charged in the District of Arizona 

with a violation of Count One of Title 8 United States Code Section 

1324(a)(1)(A)(ii)(v)(I) and (B)(iii) and the Magistrate Judge having determined from the 

affidavit of the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection filed in 

this case, the following persons can provide testimony that is material to the offense(s) 

alleged in the complaint: 

Leonel Ambriz-Pina 

 The Magistrate Judge finds that it may become impracticable to secure the 

presence of the witness(es) by subpoena in further proceedings because they are not in 

the United States legally and have no legal residence or employment in this Country. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the witness(es) shall be detained pursuant to 18 USC ' 3144 

in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or 

serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The witness(es) shall be 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. 

 Dated this 5th day of February, 2018.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
listed below of Indus International, Inc. of our report dated May 13, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Indus International,
Inc. included in this Transition Report (Form 10-K) for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2003:

1.       Registration Statement Number 333-36995 on Form S-8
2.       Registration Statement Number 333-44438 on Form S-8
3.       Registration Statement Number 333-64632 on Form S-8
4.       Registration Statement Number 333-70475 on Form S-8
5.       Registration Statement Number 333-104028 on Form S-3


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
June 24, 2003


                                      72
Case 4:18-cr-00261-CKJ-LAB Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6193 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

No. 96-6194 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus THERESA A. NOLAN, Judge; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.2 No. 96-6195 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN W. HARDWICKE, Chief Administrative Law Judge, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 96-6196 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant - Appellee.3 No. 96-6197 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN W. HARDWICKE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95-2459-L, CA-95-2407-L, CA-95-2408-L, CA-95-3348-L, CA-93-3649-L, CA95-1844-L) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Maureen Mullen Dove, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted these appeals outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain extensions of the appeal periods within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its orders on November 19, 1993, January 25, 1995, July 28, 1995, September 5, 1995, and September 6, 1995; Appellant's notices of appeal were filed on January 19, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny certificates of appealability in Nos. 96-6193, 96-6194, 96-6195, and 96-6197, and dismiss all five appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Monique Portillo, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Philip Brailsford, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00178-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

On January 4, 2019 Defendants City of Mesa, Brian Elmore, Christopher Doane, 

Bryan Cochran and Richard Gomez filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Complaint. As of this date, no responsive memorandum has been filed. Local Rule of Civil 

Procedure 7.2(i) provides in part “if the unrepresented party or counsel does not serve and 

file the required answering memorandum, . . . such noncompliance may be deemed a 

consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion 

summarily.” Pursuant to this rule, the Court deems Plaintiff’s failure to serve and file the 

required answering memorandum a consent to the granting of the Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss. 

 IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants City of Mesa, Brian Elmore, Christopher 

Doane, Bryan Cochran and Richard Gomez’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second 

Amended Complaint. (Doc. 51) 

. . . 

. . . 

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 57 Filed 01/23/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case as to Defendants City of Mesa, 

Brian Elmore, Christopher Doane, Bryan Cochran, and Richard Gomez only. 

 Dated this 23rd day of January, 2019. 

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 57 Filed 01/23/19 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14388]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration


Advisory Committee Meeting; Cancellation

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is cancelling the 
meeting of the Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration 
scheduled for June 13, 1996, to provide time for the agency to continue 
its development of strategies to address toxicity, carcinogenicity, and 
biomaterials testing. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register 
of May 24, 1996 (61 FR 26187).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan A. Homire, Office of Science 
(HF-33), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857, 301-827-3340; or call the FDA Advisory Committee Information 
Hotline, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572) in the Washington, DC area, 
Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration, code 12603.

    Dated: June 3, 1996.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 96-14388 Filed 6-06-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Quincy Elijah Alexander Maddock,

Defendant.

No. CR-17-01564-01-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER

On December 30, 2021, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released 

on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 30th day of December, 2021.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:17-cr-01564-JJT Document 84 Filed 12/30/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David M. Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended February 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   July 20, 2010
By:
/s/ David M. MorseName: David M. Morse

Title: Co-President and Chief Executive Officer





I, Desiree Mejia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report of Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended February 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   July 20, 2010
By:
/s/ Desiree MejiaName: Desiree Mejia

Title: Chief Operating Officer, Principal Financial

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-9 Concepts, Inc.(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  January 14, 2008


/s/ Albert Au
-------------------------------------------
Albert Au, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC. OTHER INFORMATION – EXHIBITS

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dresser-Rand Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leonard M. Anthony, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1)    | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date:   November 14, 2005 | /s/ Leonard   M. Anthony             |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                      |                                      |
|                      | Leonard M.   Anthony                 |
|                      | Executive   Vice President and Chief |
|                      | Financial   Officer                  |

----