alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Danny R. HAYDEN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 15935.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

May 16, 1989.

*846Jim Lynn, Columbia, for movant-appel-lant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Daryl R. Hylton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

PREWITT, Judge.

Movant sought, under Rule 24.035, to vacate a judgment and sentence for unlawful use of a weapon. § 571.030.1(4), RSMo 1986. He plead guilty to the offense and received a sentence of five years’ imprisonment. The trial court denied the motion to vacate and movant appeals.

Appellant presents one point for our consideration. That point states:

> The motion court clearly erred by denying appellant’s motion to vacate his judgment and sentence and by finding that the trial court had jurisdiction to accept appellant’s plea of guilty to the charge of unlawful use of a weapon and to sentence appellant on a conviction for that offense, because the trial court was without jurisdiction to render a judgment on the charge, in that the information with which appellant was charged was improperly amended to charge a different offense thereby depriving appellant of his right to due process of law.

Although not cited by the parties, *Winningham v. State,*646 S.W.2d 145, 146-147 (Mo.App.1983), disposes of this point. Here, as in *Winningham,*the information was filed as a result of a plea agreement. In both cases the charge was for a crime of which the circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction. It is not disputed here that the information charged an offense and that movant voluntarily plead guilty to it.

By entering his plea movant waived all defenses other than failure of the amended information to charge an offense. See *Winningham,*646 S.W.2d at 147. See also *State v. Small,*386 S.W.2d 379, 382 (Mo.1965); *State v. Morton,*338 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo.1960).

*State v. McCrary,*760 S.W.2d 542 (Mo.App.1988) and *State v. Amerson,*661 S.W. 2d 852 (Mo.App.1983), on which movant primarily relies are not controlling. The amendment in *Amerson*was not agreed to and thus was contrary to Rule 23.08. *McCrary*apparently did not involve an amended information. Although that opinion indicates that the movant there might have been entitled to relief had there been an amended information, the court did not so hold. Here, movant consented to the amendment and plead guilty to it. The trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the charge and of movant.

The judgment is affirmed.

FLANIGAN, P.J., and HOGAN, J., concur.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SHAGUFTA MALIK, * No. 13 -595V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran
*

v. * Filed: March 24, 2016
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award in AND HUMAN SERVICES, * the amount to which respondent * has not objected. Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

F. John Caldwell, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner;
Traci Patton

, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

Petitioner, Shagufta Malik, filed an unopposed application for final attorneys’ fees and costs in the above -captioned matter on March 3, 2016. Based on discussions with respondent, petitioner requests $ 25 ,000.00 for attorneys’ fees
and costs

. Respondent did not file an objection. The Court awards this amount.

Ms. Malik filed for compensation on August 21, 2013, alleging that the influenza vaccine she received on October 15, 2010, caused her to suffer from Guillain-Barré syndrome

. Petitioner received compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation. Decision, issued September 22, 2015. Because petitioner received compensation, s he is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing
redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.Petitioner seeks a total of $ 25 ,000.00 , in a ttorneys’ fees and costs for her

counsel. Petitioner did not advance any monies in reimbursable costs in pursuit of her claim, pursuant to General Order #9. Respondent did no t object to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs.

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $25,000.00, in the form of a check made payable to petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, F. John Caldwell, Jr., Esq.
, of Maglio Christopher and Toale , for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Shannon Proctor, at (202)
357-6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran
Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
**Exhibit 12.2**

Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Multicanal S.A., as*ociedad anónima* (stockcorporation) (the “Company”), does here certify, to the best of such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairlypresents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

** **
| Dated: June  30, 2003 |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
|                  |  /s/ | Adrián  Mészaros |   |
|                  |  Title: | Chief  Financial and Administrative Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13779]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for 
OMB review of the information collection system described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal without change in the substance or method 
of collection.
    Title: Uniform Application/Uniform Termination Notice for Municipal 
Securities Principal or Representative.
    Form Number: MSD-4/MSD-5.
    OMB Number: 3064-0022.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: June 30, 1996.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management 
and Budget, OIRA, Paperwork Reduction Project (3064-0022), Washington, 
DC 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Steven F. Hanft, (202) 898-3907, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-400, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 
550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before July 3, 1996.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the submission may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above. Comments regarding the 
submission should be addressed to both the OMB reviewer and the FDIC 
contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An insured state nonmember bank which serves 
as a municipal securities dealer must file Form MSD-4 or MSD-5, as 
applicable, to permit an employee to become associated or to terminate 
the association with the municipal securities dealer. The filing 
requirements are based on rules promulgated by the Municipal Securities 
Rulemaking Board under the authority of the 1975 Amendments to the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78-o-4).

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13779 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14649]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
21 CFR Part 522


Animal Drugs, Feeds, and Related Products; Change of Sponsor

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal 
drug regulations to reflect the change of sponsor for an approved new 
animal drug application (NADA) from Syntex Animal Health, Division of 
Syntex Agri-business, Inc., to Fort Dodge Laboratories, Division of 
American Home Products.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. McKay, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine (HFV-102), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 
Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-0213.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Syntex Animal Health, Division of Syntex 
Agri-business, Inc., 3401 Hillview Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94303, has 
informed FDA that it has transferred the ownership of, and all rights 
and interests in, the approved NADA 141-043 (Synovex Plus) to Fort 
Dodge Laboratories, Division of American Home Products Corp., 800 5th 
St. NW., Fort Dodge, IA 50501. -Accordingly, FDA is amending the 
regulations in 21 CFR part 522.2478 to reflect the change of sponsor.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 522

    Animal drugs.
    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and 
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 522 is 
amended as follows:

PART 522--IMPLANTATION OR INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

    1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 522 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Sec. 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
(21 U.S.C. 360b).

Sec. 522.2478  [Amended]

    2. Section 522.2478 Trenbolone acetate and estradiol benzoate is 
amended in paragraph (a) by removing ``000033'' and adding in its place 
``000856''.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Robert C. Livingston,
Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine.
[FR Doc. 96-14649 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: James Agbeze v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00140

- CR

Trial court case number: 1288928

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

The appellate record was due in this case on April 12, 2013. On May 1, 2013, the court

reporter informed us that the reporter’s record has not been filed as a result of appellant’s failure

to pay or make payment arrangements for preparation of the record. Appellant has now filed a

“ motion for extension of time to file court reporter’s record ” , requesting an extension of time

until June 30, 2013 to pay for the reporter’s record.

Appellant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Appellant is ordere d to provide

written evidence from the court reporter showing that appellant has either paid or made

arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee no later than June 12, 2013. If appellant fails to provide

said evidence by June 12, 2013, appellant’s brief will b e due no later than July 12, 2013, and the

Court may consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record

for a decision

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(c), 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3, 2013
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CombiMatrix Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Scott R. Burell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:                                           |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |                                          |
|   | /s/ SCOTT R. BURELL                           |
|   | Scott R. Burell                               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                       |
|   | *(Principal Finance and Accounting  Officer)* |
|   | August 16,  2010                         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 356 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 356

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 8, 2009.
Whereas Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Chicago publisher, William 
        Boyce, on February 8, 1910, after learning of the Scouting movement 
        during a visit to London;
Whereas, on June 21, 1910, a group of 34 national representatives met, developed 
        organization plans, and opened a temporary national headquarters in New 
        York;
Whereas the purpose of Boy Scouts of America is to teach America's youth 
        patriotism, courage, self-reliance, and kindred values;
Whereas by 1912, Scouts were enrolled in every State;
Whereas in 1916, Congress granted Boy Scouts of America a Federal charter;
Whereas each council will commit each Boy Scout to perform 12 hours of community 
        service yearly, totaling 30,000,000 community service hours each year;
Whereas membership since 1910 totals more than 111,000,000 scouts and is found 
        in 185 countries around the world;
Whereas the organization will present the 2 millionth Eagle Scout award in 2009;
Whereas more than 1,000,000 adult volunteer leaders selflessly serve young 
        people in their communities through organizations chartered by the Boy 
        Scouts of America;
Whereas these men and women often neither receive nor seek the thanks of the 
        public;
Whereas February 8, 2010, would be an appropriate day to designate as ``Boy 
        Scouts of America Day'' in celebration of the Boy Scouts of America's 
        100th anniversary; and
Whereas Boy Scouts of America endeavors to develop American citizens who are 
        physically, mentally, and emotionally fit, have a high degree of self-
        reliance as evidenced in such qualities as initiative, courage, and 
        resourcefulness, have personal values based on religious concepts, have 
        the desire and skills to help others, understand the principles of the 
        American social, economic, and governmental systems, take pride in their 
        American heritage and understand our Nation's role in the world, have a 
        keen respect for the basic rights of all people, and are prepared to 
        participate in and give leadership to American society: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the designation of 
``Boy Scouts of America Day'' in celebration of its 100th anniversary.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1495]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Injury Research Grant Review Committee: Conference Call Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following conference call committee 
meeting.

    Name: Injury Research Grant Review Committee (IRGRC).
    Time and Date: 2 p.m.-5 p.m., February 12, 1996.
    Place: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 
(NCIPC), CDC, Koger Center, Vanderbilt Building, 1st Floor, 
Conference Room 1006, 2939 Flowers Road, South, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341. (Exit Chamblee-Tucker Road off I-85.)
    Status: Open: 2 p.m.-2:15 p.m., February 12, 1996. Closed: 2:15 
p.m.-5 p.m., February 12, 1996.
    Purpose: This committee is charged with advising the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services, the Assistant Secretary for Health, 
and the Director, CDC, regarding the scientific merit and technical 
feasibility of grant applications relating to the support of injury 
control research projects and injury prevention research centers.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items for the meeting will 
include announcements, discussion of review procedures, future 
meeting dates, and review of grant applications.
    Beginning at 2:15 p.m., through 5 p.m., February 12, the 
Committee will meet to conduct a review of grant applications. This 
portion of the meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Associate Director for 
Management and Operations, CDC, pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Richard W. Sattin, M.D., 
Executive Secretary, IRGRC, National Center for Injury Prevention 
and Control, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, M/S K58, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341-3724, telephone (770) 488-4580.

    Dated: January 23, 1996.
Julia M. Fuller,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 96-1495 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I JasonMacari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Jason Macari        |                  |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|
| Jason Macari            | November 7, 2008 |
| Chief Executive Officer |                  |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert PARGO, Appellant.

No. 65912.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 20, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.

Talat M. Bashir, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michelle A. Freund, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of stealing over $150.00 in violation of § 570.030 RSMol994. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years imprisonment. We affirm.

*419We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be 'without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 32**

 

**ATLANTICSOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**For the Nine Months Ended September 30,2010**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

This12th day of November, 2010

 

 
| /s/  Mark Stevens        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| /s/  Carol Soto          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 99-1 Filed 05/17/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 99-1 Filed 05/17/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 9, 2013  /s/ Rod Bartlett Roderick Bartlett President and Chief Executive Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.