alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
of NTK Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to their
knowledge:





1.
            the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 28, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the fiscal quarter ended June 28, 2008 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Richard L.
Bready


Name: Richard L.
Bready


Title:    President
and Chief Executive Officer











/s/ Almon C.
Hall


Name:Almon C. Hall


Title:VicePresident and ChiefFinancialOfficer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29364-29365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14504]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-248-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 4, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 29, 1996, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee) tendered for filing as

[[Page 29365]]

part of its FERC Gas Tariff Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following 
tariff sheets, to become effective July 1, 1996:

First Revised Sheet No. 53
First Revised Sheet No. 54
First Revised Sheet No. 55
First Revised Sheet No. 62
First Revised Sheet No. 63
First Revised Sheet No. 64

    East Tennessee states that the proposed filing conforms the 
provisions of its LMS-MA and LMS-PA Rate Schedules related to its 
annual cashout report to industry standards, so that East Tennessee may 
carry forward any cashout loss into the subsequent year's annual 
report. The proposed filing also amends East Tennessee's Rate Schedules 
LMS-MA and LMS-PA to accurately define the value of gas delivered into 
and out of the East Tennessee system, and to resolve certain 
inconsistencies between East Tennessee's LMS Rate Schedules and 
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company's Rate Schedule LMS-MA.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with section 385.214 and section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14504 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
31.1


Section
302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
 
 I, Peter
Lawrence Wells, certify that:
 
 1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bluebird Exploration
Company.
 
 2.   Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances   under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;
 
 3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;
 
 4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
 that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
 consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
 those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
 quarterly
report is being prepared;
 
 b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
 controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
 the
filing date of this quarterly  report
(the  "Evaluation
 Date");
and
 
 c)   presented
in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
 effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
 our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 
 a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of
 internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
 ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data
 and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
 weaknesses
in internal controls; and
 
 b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
 or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
 internal
controls.
 
 6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material
weaknesses.
 
 
 Date:
August 7, 2008
 
 
 /s/
Peter Lawrence Wells
 Peter
Lawrence Wells
 Chief
Executive Officer and
 Chief
Financial Officer
-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mary Jo O’Neill, AZ Bar #005924 

James P. Driscoll-MacEachron, AZ Bar #027828 

Michael Baskind, AZ Bar #030810 

Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission, Phoenix District Office 

3300 N. Central Ave., Suite 690 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

Telephone: (602) 640-5003 

Fax: (602) 640-5009 

Email: mary.oneill@eeoc.gov

james.driscoll-maceachron@eeoc.gov

michael.baskind@eeoc.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Mark W. Robertson (N.Y. S.B. # 4508248) 

Kelly Wood (C.A. S.B. # 267518) 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Times Square Tower 

7 Times Square 

New York, New York 10036 

Telephone: (212) 430-6000 

Fax: (213) 430-6407 

Email: mrobertson@omm.com

kwood@omm.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and 

ENVOY AIR INC., 

 Defendants 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 2:17-cv-04059-SPL 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

CONSENT DECREE 

Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Defendants American 

Airlines, Inc. and Envoy Air Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, jointly move this 

Case 2:17-cv-04059-SPL Document 4 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court to enter and approve the Consent Decree that has been lodged on this date. The 

parties stipulate that this Consent Decree is fair, reasonable, and equitable and does not 

violate the law or public policy. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 

/s/ Michael Baskind 

MICHAEL BASKIND 

Trial Attorney 

MARY JO O’NEILL 

Regional Attorney 

JAMES P. DRISCOLL-MACEACHRON 

Supervisory Trial Attorney 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

Phoenix District Office 

3300 N. Central Ave., Ste. 690 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ Mark W. Robertson 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

MARK W. ROBERTSON 

KELLY WOOD 

Times Square Tower 

7 Times Square 

New York, New York 10036 

Attorneys for Defendants 

American Airlines, Inc. and 

Envoy Air Inc. 

Case 2:17-cv-04059-SPL Document 4 Filed 11/03/17 Page 2 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Hayley Holland-Honea, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Banner Health, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00448-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court are: (1) the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction of 

Defendant United States (Doc. 8); and (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay (Doc. 10). For the 

reasons set forth in the motion papers of the parties the motion to dismiss by the United 

States is granted due to the Plaintiffs’ failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The 

dismissal is without prejudice. While the Court appreciates the arguments set forth by 

the Plaintiffs and the remaining Defendants, the motion to stay is denied, and the matter 

is remanded to state superior court. This Court realizes that the matter may again need to 

be removed to this Court if the Plaintiffs do not achieve adequate relief against the United 

States in the administrative process. If they do, however, there is no jurisdictional basis 

to proceed against the remaining Defendants. Accordingly, the Court declines to stay the 

case, and orders that the remaining case be remanded to the state superior court. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 

(Doc. 1) is granted and Defendant United States is dismissed without prejudice. 

/ / / 

Case 2:18-cv-00448-GMS Document 14 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay (Doc. 8) is denied. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to remand the remaining action back to Pinal County 

Superior Court for further proceedings. 

 Dated this 31st day of May, 2018. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:18-cv-00448-GMS Document 14 Filed 05/31/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29540-29541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14666]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29541]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-262-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

June 5, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 31, 1996, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become effective June 1, 
1996:

Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 18

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheet is being filed to 
restate its currently effective Gas Supply Realignment (``GSR'') and 
Pricing Differential (``PD'') Reservation Surcharges, to reflect the 
impact of the annual update of the Eligible MDQ that is used to 
calculate those Surcharges, as required by and consistent with ANR's 
transition cost recovery mechanism set forth in its tariff.
    ANR states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each of 
ANR's Second Revised Volume No. 1 customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14666 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

I, StevenR. Berrard, certify that:

1.  I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Services Acquisition Corp.International;

2.  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.  The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control  over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ Steven R. Berrard |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|
|                    | Name:                 | Steven R. Berrard |
|                    | Title:                | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas JOHNSON, Appellant.

No. WD 50371.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 8, 1995.

Cyril M. Hendricks, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Robert R. Sterner, Pros. Atty., Mark Tracy, Asst. Pros. Atty., Callaway County, Fulton, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and KENNEDY and ELLIS, JJ.

*670
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of assault in the third degree, pursuant to § 565.070.1(1), RSMo 1994.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14793]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Hybrid Propulsion System Research Collaboration 
Agreement

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 13, 1996, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Hybrid Propulsion System 
Research Collaboration Agreement has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) The identities of the parties and (2) the 
nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are: 
General Motors Corporation, Detroit, MI; Chrysler Corporation, Highland 
Park, MI; and Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI.
    The objective of the venture is to accelerate the development of 
Hybrid Propulsion System (HPS) research, to minimize inefficient 
duplication of effort and expense, to maximize leverage of corporate 
and government resources, and to improve general scientific knowledge. 
The results will support the Partnership for a New Generation of 
Vehicles and potentially make the Parties more competitive in world 
markets. To meet these objectives, the Parties will combine their 
government-funded HPS research initiatives, collect, exchange and 
analyze research information, interact with government, auto industry 
and other entities interested in this area and perform other acts 
allowed by the National Cooperative Research and Production Act that 
would advance these goals.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-14793 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6233

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CAROLYN TRICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-96-358)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carolyn Trice, Appellant Pro Se. Scarlett Anne Wilson, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Trice appeals the district court’s order denying her

motion to expunge her criminal record. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Trice, No. CR-96-358 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 1999).

Trice’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12446]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 960129019-6091-01, I.D. 051396E]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Other 
Nontrawl Fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management 
Area

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for groundfish in the 
other nontrawl fishery in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
management area (BSAI). This action is necessary to prevent exceeding 
the 1996 bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut apportioned to the other 
nontrawl fishery category in the BSAI.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), May 15, 1996, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    The 1996 bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut apportioned to the 
other nontrawl fishery category, which is defined at 
Sec. 675.21(b)(2)(ii)(E), was established by the Final 1996 Harvest 
Specifications of Groundfish (61 FR 4311, February 5, 1996) as 100 
metric tons.
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 675.21(d), that the 1996 bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut 
apportioned to the other nontrawl fishery category in the BSAI has been 
reached. Therefore, NMFS is closing the directed fishery for groundfish 
in the other nontrawl fishery category in the BSAI.
    Maximum retainable bycatch amounts for applicable gear types may be 
found in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under Sec. 675.21 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801, et seq.

    Dated: May 13, 1996.
Donald J. Leedy,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-12446 Filed 5-14-96; 3:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Transition Period Report on Form
10KSB for the period ended October 31, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Superclick, Incorporated.

Date: January 29, 2004                      By: /s/ Ronald Fon
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Name: Ronald Fon
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Chief Executive Officer