alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT**

**TO SARBANES-OXLEY**

**SECTION 302**

 

I, Richard M. Lerner, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: March 25, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 691 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 691

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 30, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2749) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act to improve the safety of food in the global market, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in 
the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of 
the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13973]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Tuesday, June 11, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-13973 Filed 5-30-96; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Ecology Mir Group, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63459

)

Under Contract No. W912EE-21-P-0051 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Christopher R. Tate, Esq.

 Flora Pettit, PC

 Charlottesville, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

James E. Pigott, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Vicksburg

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: April 14, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63459, Appeal of Ecology Mir 

Group, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: April 14, 2023

LAURA EYESTER

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of DataMill Media Corp. (f/k/a/Smitten Press: Local Lore and Legends, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Beatty, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:September 27, 2010
  /s/ VINCENT BEATTY


Vincent Beatty


Director acting as Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1438]



      
      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 1996 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 2334]]




FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' NUMBER: 96-595.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE AND TIME: Thursday, January 25, 1996, 10:00 
a.m. Meeting Open to the Public.

THE FOLLOWING ITEM WAS ADDED TO THE AGENDA: Final Audit Report--Jude 
for Congress (Revised 1/5/96).

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, January 30, 1996 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This Meeting Will Be Closed to the Public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
    Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
    arbitration
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
    particular employee

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 1, 1996 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor.)

STATUS: This Meeting Will Be Open to the Public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes
Title 26 Certification Matters
Advisory Opinion 1995-96: Benjamin L. Ginsberg on behalf of Friends 
    of Senator D'Amato
Administrative Matters

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Delores Hardy,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 96-1438 Filed 1-23-96; 2:48 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Dwayne Fosseen, Chief Executive Officer and President of Mirenco, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Registrant

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (Registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function) 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 14,2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant.

CR-18-223-TUC-RCC(DTF)

AMENDED NOTICE OF 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

FOR INTERVENORS

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this 

case as counsel for the following additional parties who have moved to join First Look 

Media Works, Inc.’s, Motion to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Challenging the 

Sealing of Records (Doc. No. 195, filed Apr. 29, 2019):

Phoenix Newspapers Inc. (publisher of The Arizona Republic); The Associated 

Press; Cable News Network, Inc. (“CNN”); The New York Times Company; and WP 

Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post.

Respectfully submitted this 6th day of June, 2019.

/s/ Gregg P. Leslie

Gregg P. Leslie, Bar # 035040

First Amendment Clinic, Public Interest Law Firm

Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor

 College of Law

111 E. Taylor St., Mail Code 8820

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Gregg.Leslie@asu.edu

Phone: (480) 727-7398

Fax: (602) 496-1382

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 249 Filed 06/06/19 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14039]




[[Page 28601]]

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 96-055]


NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity Sciences and 
Applications Advisory Committee, Task Force on Countermeasures; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity 
Sciences and Applications Advisory Committee, Task Force on 
Countermeasures.

DATES: June 27, 1996, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and June 28, 1996, 8:00 
a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Universities Space Research Association, 3600 Bay Area 
Blvd., Houston, TX, 77058.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Frank Sulzman, Code UL, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Status and review of Report Outline
--Reports and presentations
--Sub-group status reports
--Discussion
--Tag up
--Sub-group break-out sessions
--Sub-group reports
--Sub-group break-out sessions

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: May 30, 1996.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-14039 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7317

ANGELA JAMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Federal Prison Camp

at Alderson,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (1:04-cv-01029)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela James, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
*The district court appeared to construe the petition as a

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissed it for failure

to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000).

Because the district court did not have jurisdiction under § 2255

to consider the validity of James’ sentence on her convictions

arising out of the Western District of North Carolina, we decline

to consider this case under § 2255.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Angela James filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000), raising a claim under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296

(2004). However, James failed to meet the standard under In re

Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000), and is therefore not

entitled to proceed under § 2241.* Accordingly, we deny James’

motions for appointment of counsel, for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, and to hold her appeal in abeyance, and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Lonnie D. SNELLING, Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.

No. 64301.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 9, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied April 26, 1994.

Lonnie D. Snelling, pro se.

Charles M. Poplstein, Thompson & Mitchell, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and SMITH and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00240-CR

Mario Jesus RAMIREZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR10323

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due on June 12, 2015. Court reporter Amy Hinds 

Alvarado filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting additional time to file the 

record. We granted her request and ordered her to file the reporter’s record by July 24, 2015. The 

reporter’s record, however, has not been filed. We ORDER Amy Hinds Alvarado to file the 

reporter’s record no later than September 4, 2015. If the reporter’s record is not received by 

such date, an order may be issued directing Amy Hinds Alvarado to appear and show cause why 

she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7246
DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN VINCENT GEISE; RANGARATH MANTHRIPRAGADA; PAMELA COCHRAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA02-1769-PJM) Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Damon Emmanuel Elliott appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to allege specific facts supporting his claims as instructed by the court’s prior order. Because Elliott may be able to proceed with this action by amending his complaint to allege sufficient facts to state a claim, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

1 O United States of America, No. 18-06028MJ-001-PCT-DKD 

11 Plaintiff, ORDER 

12 v. 

13 Darvin Lee, 

14 Defendant. 

15 

.16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

, Defendant appeared in court with counseL Pursuant to 18 U.S. C .\_§ 3141 et. seq. a 

detention hearing was held. The defendant is ordered detained pending an intake 

assessment for placement at Crossroads in Phoenix, Arizona or other facility as 

designated by Pretrial Services. Should defendant qualify for such placement, defendant 

shall be released upon conditions set by this Court, including pretrial residency at said 

facility,· as conditions do exist which would reasonably assure the safety of others and the 

appearance of the defendant. Should defendant not so qualify, the release conditions set 

by this Court shall be vacated and defendant shall be detained pending trial as there are 

no conditions or combination of conditions which would reasonably assure the safety of 

others or the appearance of the defendant. 

The Pretrial Services Officer is ordered to timely notify this Court of the 

defendant's intake assessment results, and if found acceptable, the date and time the 

II 

7 
1 facilit~ will provide transportation from the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse for the 

2 defendant. 

3 Dated this 2nd day of February, 2018. 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 -
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14654]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-149-004]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

June 5, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 31, 1996, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective on the 
dates shown below:

January 1, 1996

First Revised Tenth Revised Sheet No. 8
First Revised Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 9
First Revised Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 13
First Revised Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 16
First Revised Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 18

March 1, 1996

Substitute Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 8
Substitute Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 9
Substitute Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 13
Substitute Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 16
Substitute Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 18
Substitute Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 18
    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to implement the Stipulation and Agreement (Stipulation) filed by ANR 
in the referenced proceeding on January 5, 1996, and approved by the 
Commission in a March 4, 1996 Letter Order. The Stipulation resolves 
ANR's recovery of certain pricing differential costs.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14654 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M