alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2006 of Ready Mix, Inc. (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarterly (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2006
    
    /s/ Clint TryonClint TryonChief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Curtis L. JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Curtis L. JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

Nos. 66731, 69580.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Dec. 17, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

*237Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Curtis Johnson appeals Ms conviction after a jury trial of two counts of first degree assault (Counts I and III), in violation of § 565.050 RSMo 1994 and two counts of armed criminal action (Counts II and IV), in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1994, on wMch he was sentenced to consecutive terms of twenty years on Counts I and III and concurrent terms of twenty years on Counts II and IV. Johnson also appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an eviden-tiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opirnon. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for tMs order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
H. Res. 661 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 20, 2009. 

Resolved, That the managers on the part of the House 

of Representatives in the impeachment proceedings now pending in the Senate against Samuel B. Kent, formerly judge of 

the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Texas, are instructed to appear before the Senate, sitting as 

a court of impeachment for those proceedings, and advise the 

Senate that, because Samuel B. Kent is no longer a civil officer of the United States, the House of Representatives does 

not desire further to urge the articles of impeachment hitherto filed in the Senate against Samuel B. Kent. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20


                                                                           MEMO.


TO:      Rob Lowery, HSNS

FROM:    Richard E. Brodsky

DATE:    12/5/00


         On behalf of William R. Dunavant, I propose the following. In exchange
for Dunavant's waiving objection to the failure of HSNS to file the North
Carolina fairness proceeding for the Dunavant shares, as was called for under
the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement:

         1.       HSNS will amend the currently filed Registration Statement on
Form S-1, SEC file no. 333-41730, to include, as to Dunavant, 2,000,000 HSNS
Shares plus any Monthly Shares (pursuant to Paragraph II.B of the October 26,
2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement and Paragraph 3 of this
memo) due and owing through the effective date of the Registration Statement,
and will use its best efforts to make the Registration Statement become
effective.

         2.       HSNS will continue the issuance of Monthly Shares under
Paragraph II.B of the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement
Agreement until the later of (a) the effectiveness of the Registration Statement
or (b) the receipt by Dunavant of Rule 144 letters as to all 2,000,000 Shares
plus Monthly Shares in his possession or due and owing as of March 15, 2001.

         3.       HSNS and Dunavant agree that Dunavant now holds 2,050,000 HSNS
Shares. 25,000 Shares are deemed to be in satisfaction of the Monthly Shares
requirement under Paragraph II.B of the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and
Restated Settlement Agreement for the period ended November 26, 2000. 25,000 are
deemed to be an advance on the Monthly Shares requirement under Paragraph II.B
of the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement for the
period ended December 26, 2000. If the Registration Statement becomes effective
before December 26, 2000, these shares will not be included in the Registration
Statement as it becomes effective but instead will be restricted securities.

         If this is acceptable, please sign below where indicated and return to
me via fax.

High Speed Net Solutions, Inc.


By:  /s/ Andy Fox
   -----------------------------------------
Its: President & CEO
   -----------------------------------------

Dated: 12/5/00
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 18, 2016

Order 

March 18, 2016

150404(28)(29)

IN RE J. CEDRIC SIMPSON, JUDGE

14A DISTRICT COURT

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION

____________________________________________

SC: 150404

JTC Formal Complaint 96

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for immediate consideration is 

GRANTED. The motion of the Judicial Tenure Commission to expedite the matter by 

issuing a scheduling order with shortened time requirements for filing a supplemental 

petition and response thereto is considered, and it is DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean Perrotti, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: May 6, 2010
                /s/
      Jean PerrottiJean
      PerrottiChief
      Financial Officer AndPrinciple
      Accounting Officer
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 672 

Calling on the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to release 

imprisoned bloggers and respect Internet freedom. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2009 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California (for herself, Mr. CAO, and Ms. ZOE

LOFGREN of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Calling on the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to release imprisoned bloggers and respect Internet 

freedom. 

Whereas the Internet is a tool to exercise freedom of expression and association, both of which are basic human 

rights; 

Whereas the Internet is a medium to share information freely, promote social and economic development, and connect Vietnamese citizens domestically and internationally; 

Whereas the Government of Vietnam created the Administration Agency for Radio, Television and Electronics Information in October 2008 and issued Circular 07 in December 2008 to restrict Internet freedom, censor private 

blogs, and compel information technology companies to 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 672 IH 

cooperate with government efforts to monitor personal information of Internet users; 

Whereas the Government of Vietnam has imprisoned bloggers 

and numerous democracy activists who have distributed 

their peaceful views over the Internet; 

Whereas the Government of Vietnam continues to firewall external websites promoting democracy and human rights; 

and 

Whereas these actions violate individuals’ right to freedom of 

speech and expression: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the right of Vietnamese citizens to 

3 access websites of their choosing and to have the 

4 freedom to share and publish information over the 

5 Internet; 

6 (2) calls on the Government of Vietnam to re7 peal Circular 07, Article 88, and similar statutes 

8 that restrict the Internet, so as to be in line with the 

9 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 

10 to which the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a sig11 natory; 

12 (3) calls on the Government of Vietnam to be13 come a responsible member state of the international 

14 community by respecting individuals’ freedom of 

15 speech, freedom of press, and freedom of political 

16 association; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 672 IH 

1 (4) calls on the Government of Vietnam to re2 lease all political prisoners, including but not limited 

3 to the following bloggers and cyber activists— 

4 (A) Le Cong Dinh; 

5 (B) Le Nguyen Sang; 

6 (C) Le Thi Cong Nhan; 

7 (D) Nguyen Van Hai (Dieu Cay); 

8 (E) Nguyen Xuan Nghia; 

9 (F) Ngo Quynh; 

10 (G) Nguyen Ngoc Quang; 

11 (H) Nguyen Thi Hong; 

12 (I) Nguyen Van Dai; 

13 (J) Pham Ba Hai; 

14 (K) Pham Thanh Nghien; 

15 (L) Pham Van Troi; 

16 (M) Tran Huynh Duy Thuc; 

17 (N) Truong Minh Duc; 

18 (O) Truong Quoc Huy; 

19 (P) Vu Hoang Hai; 

20 (Q) Nguyen Tien Trung; and 

21 (R) Vu Hung. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00411

- CR

K IRK L YNN W RIGHT

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 297th District

Court

of Tarrant C ounty (1565482D)

December 5, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTR ICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_______________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-40308 Summary Calendar

_____________________

FRANK RAMIREZ GUEVARA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CAROL VANCE, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 94-CV-181

_________________________________________________________________

March 13 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant's civil

rights complaint against several defendants as frivolous pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and the dismissal of his complaint against

the remaining defendants following a bench trial. We have reviewed

the record, the district court's order, and the briefs, and

determine that the appeal is frivolous.

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir.

Rule 42.2.-2-

We caution Guevara that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions.

To avoid sanctions, Guevara is further cautioned to review any

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING GIVEN.
Order filed April 11 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 0 1046

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.K., C.A.A.K., J.J.K., AND J.A.K., children

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CCL

- 6454



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). On March 26, 2012, this court granted appellant’s request for a supplement reporter’s record The supplemental reporter’s record was due April 9, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). The record has not been filed. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012) . The trial and appellate courts are jointly2

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute rep orter, if

necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1).

Because the supplemental reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Marsha Burns , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
on or before April 20 , 2012. If Marsha Burns does not timely file the record as ordered, the court will issue an order requiring her to appear at a hearing to show cause why the record has not been timely filed and why she should not be held in contempt of court for failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of court is punishable by a fine and/or confinement in jail. Appellant’s brief is due 7 days after the supplemental reporter’s record is filed.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The table below lists DDi Corp.s consolidated
subsidiaries. The ownership of these entities is as follows:



|                                |  |                              |  |                                                       
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Name                            |  | Jurisdiction of
Organization |  | Ownership                                             
|DDi Intermediate Holdings Corp. |  | California                   |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Corp.                      
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Capital Corp.               |  | California                   |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Intermediate Holdings Corp.
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Global Corp.                |  | California                   |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Capital Corp.              
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Sales Corp.                 |  | Delaware                     |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Global Corp.               
|                                |  |                             
|DDi North Jackson Corp.         |  | Ohio                         |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Global Corp.               
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Toronto Corp.               |  | Ontario, Canada              |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Global Corp.               
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Milpitas Corp.              |  | Delaware                     |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Global Corp.               
|                                |  |                             
|Coretec USA Inc.                |  | Delaware                     |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Global Corp.               
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Cleveland Holdings Corp.    |  | Ohio                         |  | 100% directly owned by Coretec USA Inc.               
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Denver Corp.                |  | Colorado                     |  | 100% directly owned by Coretec USA Inc.               
|                                |  |                             
|Coretec Building Inc.           |  | Colorado                     |  | 100% directly owned by Coretec USA Inc.               
|                                |  |                             
|DDi Cleveland Corp.             |  | Ohio                         |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Cleveland Holdings Corp.   
|                                |  |                             
|Trumauga Properties, Ltd.       |  | Ohio                         |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Cleveland Holdings Corp.
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Candev Resource
Exploration Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark McLeary, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

|Date: September 11, 2008 | /s/ Mark McLeary           
|------------------------ | ---------------------------
|                         | Mark McLeary               
|                         | Chief Executive Officer and
|                         | Chief Financial Officer    

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5985 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 517 Seagaze Drive in Oceanside, California, as the ``Charlesetta 
                  Reece Allen Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHARLESETTA REECE ALLEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 517 Seagaze Drive in Oceanside, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Charlesetta Reece Allen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Charlesetta Reece Allen Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 517 Seagaze Drive in Oceanside, California, as the ``Charlesetta 
                  Reece Allen Post Office Building''.
```