alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Alief Vietnamese Alliance Church, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-18-00127-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-53806

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

On February 21, 2018, relator, Alief Vietnamese Alliance Church, filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s September 8, 2017

“Order Denying Defendants’ Second Plea to the Jurisdiction,” and to compel respondent 

to sign an order granting relator’s plea to the jurisdiction. Relator has filed a sworn 

record including the September 8, 2017 order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1). Relator’s 

petition included an affidavit of counsel, to comply with the Rule 52.3(j) certification 

requirement, and relator’s counsel filed a separate affidavit of no testimony received at 

hearing stating that there was no testimony received during any hearing in this matter. 

See id. 52.3(j), 52.7(a)(2).

Accordingly, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by

any real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be 

filed within 20 days from the date of this order. See id. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 1, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15011]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


North American Wetlands Conservation Council; Meeting 
Announcement

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North American Wetlands Conservation Council (Council) 
will meet on July 10 to review proposals for funding submitted pursuant 
to the North American Wetlands Conservation Act. Upon completion of the 
Council's review, proposals will be submitted to the Migratory Bird 
Conservation Commission with recommendations for funding. The meeting 
is open to the public.

DATES: July 10, 1996, 9:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hampton Inn, 3985 Bennet 
Drive, Hospitality Suite, Bellingham, Washington. The North American 
Wetlands Conservation Council Coordinator is located at Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Arlington Square Building, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, 
Suite 110, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryon Kenneth Williams, Coordinator, North American Wetlands 
Conservation Council, (703) 358-1784.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the North American 
Wetlands Conservation Act (Pub. L. 101-233, 103 Stat. 1968, December 
13, 1989, as amended), the North American Wetlands Conservation Council 
is a Federal-State-private body which meets to consider wetlands 
acquisition, restoration, enhancement and management projects for 
recommendation to and final approval by the Migratory Bird Conservation 
Commission. Proposals from State, Federal, and private sponsors require 
a minimum of 50 percent non-Federal matching funds.

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
John G. Rogers,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 96-15011 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cytta Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Stephen Spalding, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   __/s/ Stephen
Spalding__________________ Name: Stephen
Spalding Title: Chief
Executive and Financial Officer Date: February
16, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14580]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. ER96-1426-000 and ER96-1431-000]


Northern Indiana Public Service Company, NIPSCO Energy Services, 
Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 5, 1996.
    On March 26, 1996, NIPSCO Energy Services, Inc. (NIPSCO Energy) 
filed an application for authorization to sell power at market-based 
rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, 
NIPSCO Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liabilities by NIPSCO Energy. On May 29, 1996, the 
Commission issued an Order Accepting for Filing and Suspending Proposed 
Transmission Tariffs, Conditionally Accepting for Filing Proposed 
Market-Based Rates, and Granting Waivers and Authorizations (Order), in 
the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's May 29, 1996 Order granted the request for blanket 
approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in Ordering 
Paragraphs (F), (G), and (I):
    (F) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by NIPSCO Energy 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (G) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (F) above, NIPSCO Energy is hereby authorized to 
issue securities and to assume obligations or liabilities as guarantor, 
endorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, compatible with 
the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (I) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of NIPSCO 
Energy's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 28, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14580 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
----

| (1)    | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date:  November 13, 2009 | /s/ Edward J. Geletka                               |   |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | Edward J. Geletka,                                  |   |
|                               | President and Chief Executive Officer               |   |
|                               |                                                |   |
|                               |                                                |   |
| Date:  November 13, 2009 | /s/ L. Joseph Stella, III, CPA                      |   |
|                               | L. Joseph Stella, III, CPA                          |   |
|                               | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer |   |
**Exhibit
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
      to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President
      and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
      respectively, of NTK Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to
      their knowledge:





1.
            the
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
                September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
                the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Company.














/s/
      Richard L.
      Bready


Name:
      Richard L. Bready


Title:    President
      and Chief Executive Officer











/s/
      Almon C.
      Hall


Name:
      Almon C. Hall


Title:    Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
----

|   | 1. | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141810 pertaining to various benefit plans      including equity, savings and deferred compensation  plans), |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No.333-141898), |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No.333-115148), |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-66088), |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-47532), |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 6. | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-31394),and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 7. | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No 333-32036); |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|--------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
registration statements No. 333-117956 and 333-79391 on Form

S-8 of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 30, 2007,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hopfed Bancorp, Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hopfed Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Rayburn, Bates & Fitzgerald, P.C.
|                                     
|Brentwood, Tennessee                 
|Date: March 30, 2007
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1354

_____________________________
T IMOTHY H ANNER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for L eon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

. September 26, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R OWE , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

__ ___________________________2 Timothy Hanner, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiffs, *v.*Alexander Lavrowsky and Auto Parking Devices, Inc., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 19, 1956.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Philip Kahaner*of counsel), for plaintiffs.

*Herman Chaityor*for defendants.

Benedict D. Dineen, J.

The defendants are charged with violation of section 352 of article 23-A of the General Business Law. Plaintiffs seek an injunction upon the grounds that the defendants have made fradulent representations in connection with the sale of stock and that defendants have failed to file a dealer’s statement as by law required and as particularly set forth in section 359-e of the General Business Law. During the course of an investigation into the activities of the defendants it became apparent -that the individual defendant had sold stock of the defendant corporation to upwards of 10 people. Defendant concedes that stock was sold to a few people. The *601affidavits of several of the purchasers of stock reveal that they relied upon representations made by the individual defendant who is also president of the corporate defendant, that the corporation had a contract with the Chrysler Corporation whereby it was to receive a substantial sum in advance and a royalty on each device manufactured by the Chrysler Corporation. This representation was made in connection with and as part of the method employed by the defendants to dispose of some stock. This representation was false and tended to deceive and mislead prospective purchasers into buying the stock. Defendant claims he is not making sales to the general public but merely to a few purchasers and that the stock is his personal stock. Some of the stock sold appeared to be in a nonexistent New York corporation and is explained by the defendant as a mistake and that the corporation was formed in New Jersey and defendant offers to exchange the stock. Whether defendants would have disposed of more stock were it not for the restraining order contained in the order to show cause is problematical. It is apparent, however, that whatever sales were made were negotiated and concluded on the misrepresentations of the Chrysler Corporation contract made at the time. Such sales, if allowed to continue, will actually deceive and defraud prospective purchasers. The purpose of the statute is to protect such purchasers and under section 352 of article 23-A a showing of a public offering is not necessary.

Motion granted.
#### Tarhayi *v.*Allegheny Valley Street Railway Co., Appellant.

*Negligence*— Street *railways*— Infants—Case *for jury.*

In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by a girl six years old in consequence of being struck by one of defendant’s ears, the case is for the jury, and a verdict for the plaintiff will be sustained, where the disputed question of fact at the trial was whether the plaintiff had suddenly run from the sidewalk in front of the car and was not in view of the motorman until the moment she was struck, or whether she and other children were standing in the narrow space between the tracks and in full view when the car was started.

Argued Oct. 28,1913.

Appeals, Nos. 182 and 183, Oct.. *352T., 1913, from judgment, of C. P. Allegheny Co., Third T., 1911, No. 57, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of Stef Tarhayi in his own behalf and on behalf of Johanna Tarhayi, his minor child, v. Allegheny Valley Street Railway Company, a corporation.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Evans, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Verdict for Stef Tarhayi in his own behalf for $750 and on behalf of Johanna Tarhayi for $2,300, on which judgment was entered. Defendant appealed.

*Errors assigned*were in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant and to enter judgment for defendant n. o. v.

*A. Wilson McOandless,*with him *Stone*cG *Stone,*for appellant.

*J. M.*Friedman, for appellee.

January 5, 1914:

Per Curiam,

A girl six years old was returning from school with a number of children of about the same age and was injured by the defendant’s car on a village street where it had two tracks. The car had been stopped on the south track to await the removal of a horse and wagon which. Avere in front of it. After these were removed the car Avas started quite slowly, and had moved tAvice its length Avhen the girl Avas struck. When the car was started the track in front of it was clear, but a horse and wagon moving in the opposite direction were advancing on the north track. The questions of fact at the trial were, whether the girl had suddenly run from the sidewalk, and was not in view of the motorman until the moment *353she was struck, or whether she and other children were standing in the narrow space between the tracks and in full view when the car was started.

The assignments of error are to the refusal to direct a verdict for the defendant. Whether the children were between the tracks, and the motorman saw or should have seen them; or whether hemmed in by the advance of the car and the wagon, they were in such position, that under the impulse of fright, they would be apt to run across the tracks, were questions for the jury. ■ They were submitted with most careful instructions to which no exceptions were taken.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2****MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony Slater, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pike Electric Corporation 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting, which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     /s/ Anthony K. Slater   Date: November 14, 2006 Anthony K. Slater
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of American
Racing Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:    September 7, 2006          By:    /s/ A. Robert  Koveleski
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  A. Robert Koveleski
                                    Title: Interim Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Racing Capital,
Inc. and will be retained by American Racing Capital, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bonnie WATSON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Robert WATSON, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 70066.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 1, 1996.

David A. Dalton, Adams, Dalton & Coyne, Wentzville, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Janis B. Powell, J. Patrick Winning, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting father’s motion to set aside the default judgment entered on mother’s motion to modify the dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).