alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CORE/3505308.0002/139638063.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Carrie M. Francis (020453)

Stefan M. Palys (024752) 

Michael Vincent (029864)

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Tel: (602) 279-1600 

Fax: (602) 240-6925 

Email: carrie.francis@stinson.com

 stefan.palys@stinson.com

 michael.vincent@stinson.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeremy Thacker, No. 2:18-cv-00063-PHX-DJH

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF 

SERVICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS 

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC; Robert J. Donat, 

Individually and as Trustee of The 

Robert Donat Living Trust Dated April 

19, 2017; 

Defendants.

Defendants hereby give notice, pursuant to General Order 17-08, of service upon 

Plaintiff of Defendants’ Sixth Supplemental Disclosure Statement by e-mail on July 20, 

2018. Defendants’ Fifth Supplemental Disclosure Statement was served on June 29, 

2018. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 20th day of July, 2018.

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP 

By: /s/ Michael Vincent 

Carrie M. Francis

Stefan M. Palys 

Michael Vincent

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Attorneys for Defendants
2 

CORE/3505308.0002/139638063.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on July 20, 2018, I caused the foregoing document to be 

filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF; and that ECF will send an enotice of the electronic filing to: 

Kraig J. Marton 

Jeffrey A. Silence 

Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 

3200 N. Central Avenue, 20th Fl 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

kjm@jaburgwilk.com 

jxs@jaburgwilk.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Timothy B. O’Connor 

Schneider & Onofry, PC 

365 East Coronado Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 

toconnor@soarizonalaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Donat 

/s/ C. Roundtree
#### Michael L. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50183.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 12, 1995.

James C. Cox, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Michael Jones was charged by information with robbery in the second degree. Jones pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement that he would not be sentenced as a persistent offender. Jones was sentenced to nine years imprisonment with no status, to run concurrently with a previous jury-tried case in which he received a sentence of eight years as a persistent offender. Jones claims ineffective assistance of counsel and states he feels he was mislead by counsel in pleading guilty to the charges in the case at bar. Jones claims he accepted the plea agreement because he understood he would not be treat*541ed as a persistent offender in *either*ease. His motion under Rule 24.035 was denied.

Affirmed, Rule 84.16(b).
CORE/3505308.0002/141940844.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Carrie M. Francis (020453)

Stefan M. Palys (024752) 

Michael Vincent (029864)

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Tel: (602) 279-1600 

Fax: (602) 240-6925 

Email: carrie.francis@stinson.com

 stefan.palys@stinson.com

 michael.vincent@stinson.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeremy Thacker, No. 2:18-cv-00063-PHX-DJH

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF 

SERVICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC; Robert J. Donat, 

Individually and as Trustee of The 

Robert Donat Living Trust Dated April 

19, 2017; 

Defendants.

Defendants hereby give notice, pursuant to General Order 17-08, of service upon 

Plaintiff of Defendants’ Eighth Supplemental Disclosure Statement by e-mail on 

August 16, 2018. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 17th day of August, 2018. 

STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP 

By: /s/ Michael Vincent 

Carrie M. Francis

Stefan M. Palys 

Michael Vincent

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584 

Attorneys for Defendants
2 

CORE/3505308.0002/141940844.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on August 17, 2018, I caused the foregoing document to be 

filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF; and that ECF will send an enotice of the electronic filing to: 

Kraig J. Marton 

Jeffrey A. Silence 

Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 

3200 N. Central Avenue, 20th Fl 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

kjm@jaburgwilk.com 

jxs@jaburgwilk.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Timothy B. O’Connor 

Schneider & Onofry, PC 

365 East Coronado Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 

toconnor@soarizonalaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Donat 

/s/ C. Roundtree
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Emilio Urena-Villa,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 17-1860-TUC-CKJ (BGM)

 

 ORDER

On July 17, 2018, Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald issued a Report and

Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 69) in which he recommended the Court deny the Motion

to Dismiss Indictment [sic] Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 24), Motion for Production of Grand

Jury Transcript (Doc. 25), and Motion to Dismiss (Commerce Clause) (Doc. 34) filed by

Defendant Emilio Urena-Villa (“Urena-Villa”). The R & R notified the parties that they had

fourteen days from the date of being served with the copy of the Report and

Recommendation to serve and file any objections. No objections have been filed.

The standard of review that is applied to a magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation is dependent upon whether a party files objections – the Court need not

review portions of a report to which a party does not object. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,

150 (1985). However, the Court must “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s

disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or

modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the

magistrate judge with instructions.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Nonetheless, “while the statute does not require the judge to review an issue de novo if no

objections are filed, it does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or

at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.

The Court has reviewed and considered the pending motions and related documents.

 Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 69) is ADOPTED. 

2. The Motion to Dismiss Indictment [sic] Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 24) is

DENIED.

3. The Motion for Production of Grand Jury Transcript (Doc. 25) is DENIED.

4. The Motion to Dismiss (Commerce Clause) (Doc. 34) is DENIED.

DATED this 6th day of August, 2018.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Narachi President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 3, 2010



| |  |                                       |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Michael A. Narachi                |  | 
| |  | Michael A. Narachi                    |  | 
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   May 16, 2011 | /s/ Richard Leimbach                                            |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Richard Leimbach                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |
|                           | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
H. Res. 679 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 15, 2009. 

Whereas, on September 16, 1919, Congress issued the American Legion a Federal charter; 

Whereas the American Legion, a veterans service organization, remains active at the national, State, and local levels; 

Whereas American Legion members, known as Legionnaires, 

donate millions of volunteer hours in Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities and State veterans homes; 

Whereas the American Legion sponsors and supports a number of activities for children and youth, including the National Oratorical Contest, Boy Scouts, American Legion 

Baseball, Boys State, and Boys Nation; 

Whereas the American Legion awards millions of dollars in 

college scholarships; 

Whereas the American Legion National Emergency Fund 

provides financial assistance to Legionnaires who are displaced by natural disasters; 

Whereas the American Legion Family Support Network provides assistance to members of the Armed Forces and 

their families; 
2 

•HRES 679 EH 

Whereas the American Legion Child Welfare Foundation has 

provided millions of dollars for programs focused on 

America’s children and youth, such as the Special Olympics and the Children’s Miracle Network; 

Whereas the American Legion Temporary Financial Assistance program provides grants to veterans who have children and who are experiencing financial hardships; 

Whereas the American Legion remains a steadfast supporter 

of a strong national defense; 

Whereas the American Legion supports maintaining a viable 

but principled foreign affairs agenda; 

Whereas the American Legion is a staunch advocate for the 

principal missions of the Department of Veterans Affairs; 

Whereas the American Legion played a principal role in the 

drafting of the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944, 

also known as the G.I. Bill of Rights; 

Whereas the American Legion supports employment programs and opportunities for veterans; 

Whereas Legionnaires believe a veteran’s service to the 

United States goes on long after the veteran is discharged from the Armed Forces; and 

Whereas many Americans recognize September 16 of each 

year as American Legion Day: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of American Legion Day; and 
3 

•HRES 679 EH 

(2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe American Legion Day with appropriate programs 

and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14133]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Information Warfare Defense; 
Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Information Warfare 
Defense will meet in closed session on June 18-19, July 30-31, and 
August 29-30, 1996 at Science Applications International Corporation, 
McLean, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the 
Task Force will focus on protection of information interests of 
national importance through establishment and maintenance of a credible 
information warfare defensive capability in several areas, including 
deterrence. This study will be used to assist in analysis of 
information warfare procedures, processes, and mechanisms, and 
illuminate future options in defensive information warfare technology 
and policy.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1)(1994), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-14133 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regal Rock, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date:  July 13, 2007


/s/ Jeanne Mok
---------------------------------------
Jeanne Mok, Principal Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 24
  CAPELLA
    EDUCATION COMPANY
  Power of
    Attorney
    of Director
    and/or
    Officer
  and/or attorneys-in-fact, and/or Form 10-K attorneys-in-fact,
  and/or
  /s/  Stephen
    G. ShankStephen
    G. Shank

/s/  Gordon
    A. HolmesGordon
    A. Holmes/s/  Lois
    M. MartinLois
    M. Martin

/s/  Jody
    G. MillerJody
    G. Miller/s/  Amy
    L. DrifkaAmy
    L. Drifka

/s/  Jeffrey
    W. TaylorJeffrey
    W. Taylor/s/  S.
    Joshua LewisS.
    Joshua Lewis

/s/  Darrell
    R. TukuaDarrell
    R. Tukua/s/  James
    A. MitchellJames
    A. Mitchell

/s/  Jon
    Q.
    Reynolds, Jr.Jon
    Q. Reynolds, Jr./s/  David
    W. SmithDavid
    W. Smith

/s/  Sandra
    E. TaylorSandra
    E. Taylor
Exhibit 99.1 A-1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, David Devine,  President and Chief Executive Officer of Devine  Entertainment
Corporation  (the  "Registrant"),  certifies  that to the best of my  knowledge,
based upon a review of the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2005 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ David Devine
----------------
Name: David Devine
Date: December 30, 2005
#### Andrew A. SHERWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41927.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 5, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 2, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 13, 1990.

David S. Durbin, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and TURNAGE and ULRICH, JJ.

*762ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-eonviction relief without an eviden-tiary hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 28721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14372]




[[Page 28719]]


_______________________________________________________________________

Part VI





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Executive Order 13008--Amending Executive Order No. 12880


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 5, 1996 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 28721]]

                Executive Order 13008 of June 3, 1996

                
Amending Executive Order No. 12880

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including the National Narcotics Leadership 
                Act of 1988, as amended (21 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), in 
                accordance with Executive Order No. 12992 of March 15, 
                1996, and in order to provide for more effective 
                management of the international narcotics control 
                policies of the United States, it is hereby ordered 
                that section 1(c) of Executive Order No. 12880 is 
                amended by deleting ``Department of State'' and 
                inserting ``Office of National Drug Control Policy'' in 
                lieu thereof.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                    THE WHITE HOUSE,
                    June 3, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96-14372
Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Stone Mountain Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Dodge, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, fully complies with the |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stone Mountain Resources, Inc. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

    
| Dated: June 27, 2006 |
|----------------------|

 

**STONE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Peter Dodge*Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14461]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, June 11, 1996 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, June 13, 1996 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor.)

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes
Advisory Opinion 1996-18: Vincent J. Bollon on behalf of the 
International Association of Fire Fighters
Advisory Opinion 1996-20: The Honorable Frank D. Lucas
Advisory Opinion 1996-21: E. Clark Richardson on behalf of the 
Business Council of Alabama
Administrative Matters

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Delores Hardy,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 96-14461 Filed 6-4-96; 3:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M