alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cellular, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rachel
Wosk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of August, 2005.

/s/ Rachel Wosk
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### Ralph S. MILBURN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 66116.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 28, 1995.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 1995.

Victor C. Strauss, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

James E. Whaley, James B. James, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his action for personal injuries.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Timothy STEGALL, Defendant-Appellant. Timothy R. STEGALL, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Nos. 55502, 57219.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 17, 1990.

Susan L. Hogan, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.

William Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant filed notice of direct appeal, but has raised no points in that appeal; there*693fore, he has abandoned it. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13957]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Meeting of the 
National Advisory Council for Nursing Research and Its Subcommittee

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the National Advisory Council for Nursing Research, National 
Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health and its 
Subcommittee on June 10-12, 1996.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below. 
Attendance will be limited to space available.
    The meetings will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, for the 
review, discussion and evaluation of individual grant applications. 
These applications and discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    A summary of the meetings, roster of committee members, and other 
information may be obtained from the Executive Secretary listed below. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Executive Secretary in advance of the meeting.
    Name of Committee: Planning Subcommittee.
    Date of Meeting: June 10.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, building 31, Conference Room 
5B03, Bethesda, MD.
    Closed: 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
    Agenda: Discussion of long-term planning and policy issues and 
review of individual grant applications.
    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council for Nursing Research.
    Date of Meeting: June 11-12, 1996.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Conference Room 
6, Bethesda, MD.
    Open: June 11, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: NINR Director's Report Discussion: Report on the Meeting of 
Advisory Council And Board Representatives, Report of the Planning 
Subcommittee, Discussion of the Report on the Role of Advisory 
Councils, NIH Tuition Reimbursement Policy, Environmental Health 
Research and Work Group Meeting, Intramural Research Programs.
    Closed: June 12, 8:30 a.m. to adjournment.
    Executive Secretary: Dr. Ernest Marquez, NINR, NIH, Building 45, 
Room 3AN-12, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.361, Nursing 
Research, National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: May 29, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13957 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
LEGAL:10884-0002/8469853.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Peter Strojnik, State Bar No. 6464

STROJNIK P.C.

2375 East Camelback Road Suite 600

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone:(602) 524-6602

ADA@strojnik.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Kuber-Ramdas Investments, LLC

Defendant(s).

Case No: 2:18-cv-00470-GMS

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF 

OFFER OF JUDGMENT

Please take notice that Plaintiff accepts Defendant’s Offer of Judgment, Exhibit 1 

hereto.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED thon the date in the header. 

STROJNIK, P.C.

Peter Strojnik, 6464

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:18-cv-00470-GMS Document 24 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroGrow International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jervis B. Perkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.





Date: August 19, 2009
By:
/s/ Jervis B. PerkinsJervis B. PerkinsChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

THE CHURCH AT DEERFIELD BEACH, INC. , Appellant,

v.

JEREMY TATOM , Appellee.

Nos. 4D2023

- 2813 and 4D2023

- 2814

[ July 3, 2024 ]

Consolidated a ppeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michele Towbin Singer , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE22017254

.
Charles Bechert, III, of Bechert & Associates, P.A.

, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Aaron Matthew Cohen, Andrew Mitchell Schwartz, David Alan Frankel of the Law Offices of David A. Frankel P.A.

, Hollywood , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

C IKLIN , L EVINE and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended July 15, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen L. Luey, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 29, 2008 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14153]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than June 20, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Kosman, Inc., Scottsbluff, Nebraska, to acquire a total of 23.0 
percent; Henry H. Kosman, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, to acquire a total of 
23.6 percent; Dianna L. Kosman, Alachua, Florida, to acquire a total of 
23.6 percent; and Ann K. Burkholder, Cozad, Nebraska, to acquire a 
total of 23.6 percent, of the voting shares of FirstMorrill Co., 
Morrill, Nebraska, and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank 
in Morrill, Morrill, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 31, 1996.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-14153 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
----

| (1)    | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the Company. |

| Date:  August      14, 2008 | /s/ Edward J. Geletka                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  | Edward      J. Geletka,                                  |   |
|                                  | President      and Chief Executive Officer               |   |
|                                  |                                                     |   |
|                                  |                                                     |   |
| Date:  August      14, 2008 | /s/ L. Joseph Stella, III,    CPA                        |   |
|                                  | L.      Joseph Stella, III, CPA                          |   |
|                                  | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-12-00121-CV

ESTATE OF LOWELL EMERY VEREEN, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 40,808-CCL

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed with this Court a joint motion to dismiss the pending appeal and to 

remand this cause to the trial court. The parties represent to this Court that they have reached a 

full and final settlement. In such a case, no real controversy exists, and, in the absence of a 

controversy, the appeal is moot.

We grant the motion. We set aside, without regard to the merits, the judgment of the trial 

court and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the 

parties’ settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement, we dismiss the appeal.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: March 5, 2013

Date Decided: March 6, 2013
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joshua W. Carden, SBN 021698

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

16427 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 410 

Scottsdale, AZ 85254

joshua@cardenlawfirm.com

(480) 454-1100 

(480) 454-1101 (Fax)

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeremy Thacker,

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC, et al.

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00063-PHX-DGC

NOTICE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby provides notice that on this date, Plaintiff electronically served his 

8th Supplemental Disclosure Statement upon Defendants in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted this 4th day of November, 2019,

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: s/Joshua W. Carden

Joshua W. Carden

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jeremy Thacker

Case 2:18-cv-00063-DGC Document 163 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 1
#### William Mark YOUNG, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Marie YOUNG, Respondent.

No. WD 49501.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 8, 1995.

Thomas R. Summers, St. Joseph, for appellant.

James A. Nadolski, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from an order granting the removal of minor children from the State of Missouri.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David SIMMS, Appellant. David SIMMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 63491, 65465.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 31, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied March 21, 1995.

*736Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by jury trial of one count of first degree robbery, one count of second degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of §§ 569.020, 565.060 and 571.015 RSMo 1986, respectively. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to life imprisonment for the first degree robbery conviction, to be served concurrently with thirty years imprisonment for the related armed criminal action conviction, to be served concurrently with twenty year sentences for the second degree assault and related armed criminal action convictions. Defendant also appeals the denial of his 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant, however, has abandoned that appeal by failing to brief any errors pertaining to the denial of post-conviction relief.

With respect to Defendant’s direct appeal, no error of law appears and an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 103 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 1
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Danna Presley Cyr, * From the 106th District Court

of Gaines County,

Trial Court No. 18-4835.

Vs. No. 11-19-00041-CR * February 26, 2021

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51143, Inc., for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51143, Inc. hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.      SuchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended July 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of 51143, Inc. 

 
| Dated: September 12, 2005 |
|---------------------------|

 

**51143, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/  Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Volcan Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the
“Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.




Date:
November 23, 2009


/s/
      Pnina FeldmanPnina
      FeldmanChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/
      Sholom FeldmanSholom
      FeldmanTreasurer
      and Secretary
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 474 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 474

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 4, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2200) to authorize the Transportation Security Administration's 
programs relating to the provision of transportation security, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Homeland Security. After general 
debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It 
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Homeland Security now printed in the bill. The 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. 
All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute are waived except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. 
Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```