alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2824-2825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1400]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5404-1]


Notice of Proposed Prospective Purchaser Agreement Pursuant to 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 
Act of 1980, as Amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization 
Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).


[[Page 2825]]

ACTION: Notice; Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a proposed prospective purchaser 
agreement associated with the Kansas City Structural Steel Site located 
in Wyandotte County Kansas was executed by the Agency on October 25, 
1995 and executed by the United States Department of Justice on 
November 29, 1995. This agreement is subject to final approval after 
the comment period. The Prospective Purchaser Agreement would resolve 
certain potential EPA claims under Section 106 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as 
amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 
(``CERCLA''), against ECI Development Corporation, the prospective 
purchaser (``the purchaser'').
    The settlement would require the purchaser to perform operation and 
maintenance actions at the property which includes maintaining the 
protective cover over potentially contaminated soil on site. The 
purchaser must comply with the institutional controls selected by the 
EPA and must provide EPA access to the Site.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the 
proposed settlement. The Agency's response to any comments received 
will be available for public inspection at the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region VII, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, 
Kansas 66101.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before [date].

AVAILABILITY: The proposed settlement is available for public 
inspection at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII, 726 
Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. A copy of the proposed 
agreement may be obtained from Anne McCauley, Remedial Project Manager, 
U.S. environmental Protection Agency, Region VII, 25 Funston Road, 
Kansas City, Kansas 66115. Comments should reference the ``Kansas City 
Structural Steel Superfund Site Prospective Purchaser Agreement'' and 
should be forwarded to Anne McCauley, Remedial Project Manager, at the 
above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ilene M. Munk, Assistant Regional Counsel, United States Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region VII, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, 
Kansas 66101, (913) 551-7807.

    Dated: December 12, 1995.
Delores Platt,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-1400 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 In connection with the Annual Report of Online Innovation, Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlene C. Schluter, Principal Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

  

Date:      September 26, 2003           

 /s/ Marlene C. Schluter                     Marlene C. Schluter, Director,   Principal Financial Officer 

----
#### Robert A. HAYNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50631.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 8, 1995.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and ULRICH and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
### NUMBER 13

- 1 4

- 00 448

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

ROLANDO ROMERO

, A ppellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, A ppellee

.

On appeal from the 9 4 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to supplement the

reporter’s record. The reporter’s record in th is cause w as filed on November 10, 2014.

Appellant has advised this Court that the record do es not contain the motion to suppress

evidence hearing conducted on or about June 5, 2014.2

When a relevant item has been omitted from the reporter’s record, the appellate

court may by letter direct the t rial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate

court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the omitted items. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

34. 6(d) . Accordingly, appellant’s motion to supplement the reporter’s record is

GRANTED

.

The court reporter of the 9 4 th District Court of Nueces County is directed to prepare

a supplemental reporter’s record in th is ca uses to include the motion to suppress

evidence hearing conducted on or about June 5, 2014. The supplemental record shall

be filed with this Court within 30 days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed th e

21 st day of November , 201 4

.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13899]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Foreign Agricultural Service

North American Public Forum for the World Food Summit

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S.-Canada Forum for the 
World Food Summit will be held June 24-25, 1996. The purpose of the 
forum is to solicit public comments on a draft regional paper and the 
draft Policy Statement and Plan of Action to be adopted at the Summit.

DATES: The forum will be held Monday, June 24, 1996 from 2:30 to 6:00 
p.m., and continue on Tuesday, June 25, 1996 from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 
p.m. Both meetings will be held at Michigan State University in East 
Lansing, Michigan.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public and 
members of the public may provide comments in writing to the Office of 
the National Secretary, Foreign Agricultural Service, Room 3008 South 
Building, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 14th and Independence Ave. 
SW, Washington, DC. 20250 or by faxing (202) 720-6103. The draft Policy 
Statement and Plan of Action is available from the FAO North American 
Liaison Office at (202) 653-2400. The draft U.S./Canada paper will be 
available in early June on the U.S. Government World Food Summit Home 
Page (http://ffas.usda.gov/ffas/food__summit/summit.html) or by 
calling (202) 690-0776.

    Signed in Washington, D.C., May 23, 1996.
August Schumacher, Jr.,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 96-13899 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
```
| Party      A: | Shenzhen      Fuqi Jewelry CO., Ltd |
|---------------|-------------------------------------|

| Party      B: | Agricultural      Bank of China, Shenzhen Central DistrictBranch |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 1. | Under      Article 2 (1) of the Contract of Maximum General Banking Facilities      (contract No. 00352008430401218) regarding the maximum general banking      facilities, loan banking facilities in Chinese or foreign currencies and      banking facilities for other types of businesses, the banking facilities      of "equivalent to RMB 100 million" shall be amended as "equivalent to RMB      150 million." |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | No      amendments shall be made with respect to the other articles of the      original Contract of Maximum General Banking Facilities (contract No.      00352008430401218). |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Party      A (Seal)Legal      representative: [illegible]Or      authorized agent   | Party      B (Seal)Legal      representative: [illegible]Or      authorized agentDate:      March 28, 2009Venue:      Shenzhen |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| [seal]: | Signatures      and official seals are found to be valid and  legitimate. |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Venoco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Issuer"), hereby certify that
the report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of the Issuer for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.

|                                                                                          |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                          |  | 
|/s/TIMOTHY M. MARQUEZTimothy M. Marquez
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
May 16, 2005 |  | 
|                                                                                          |  | 
|                                                                                          |  | 
|/s/DAVID B. CHRISTOFFERSONDavid B. Christofferson
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005    |  | 

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT I 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-10 Filed 02/15/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-10 Filed 02/15/19 Page 2 of 2
SIGNATURE PAGE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
                                       FOR
                           KENNETH ARTHUR BUTTERFIELD

                       INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR SIGNATURE PAGE

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have  executed  this  Subscription
Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    NUMBER OF SHARES 60,000 x $0.125 = $ 7,500
                                                     ------   ------     ------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
     <S>                                             <C>

       X   /s/ Kenneth Arthur Butterfield
      ----------------------------------------       --------------------------------
      Signature                                      Signature (if purchasing jointly)

       Kenneth Arthur Butterfield
      ----------------------------------------       --------------------------------
      Name Typed or Printed                          Name Typed or Printed

      Arden Hill House,  Lapworth Street
      ----------------------------------             --------------------------------
      Address                                        Address

      Lapworth, Warwichshire               UK
      ----------------------------------------       --------------------------------
      City, State and Zip Code                       City, State and Zip Code


      Telephone - Business                           Telephone - Business


      Telephone - Residence                          Telephone - Residence


      Facsimile - Business                           Facsimile - Business


      Facsimile - Residence                          Facsimile - Residence


      Tax ID# or Social Security                     Tax ID# or Social Security
</TABLE>

Name in which Shares should be issued:    Kenneth Arthur Butterfield
                                          --------------------------------------

Dated:
         -----------------------------------

This Subscription Agreement is agreed to and accepted as of  October 28, 2000
                                                             -------------------

                             IGOHEALTHY.COM, INC.

                                     /s/ Bill Glaser
                                     ------------------
                             Name:    Bill Glaser
                             Title:   Secretary and Chief Operating Officer


                                       85
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14393]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP95-185-000 and RP93-206-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Settlement

May 31, 1996.
    On May 16, 1996, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, 
and the Alberta Department of Energy (Movants) filed a proposed 
settlement and a motion for partial consolidation of the above 
captioned proceedings which relate to the ongoing rate case of Northern 
Natural Gas Company, and a proceeding to establish measures to ensure 
adequate capacity on Northern's system at Carlton, Minnesota (the 
Carlton Resolution). By letter filed May 21, 1996, the Movants informed 
the Commission that they failed to serve copies of their proposed 
settlement on all parties to the proceeding until May 21, 1996. In 
order to cure their error, and for the comment period on the settlement 
and the motion to be congruent to all parties, the Movants propose that 
initial comments be due 20 days from the time of complete service, or 
June 10, 1996, and reply comments be due 10 days thereafter, or June 
20, 1996, as provided for by Rule 602 of the Commission's regulations.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that initial comments to 
the Movant's May 16, 1996 filing are due on or before June 10, 1996, 
and reply comments are due on or before June 20, 1996.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14393 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In Re TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS 

ASSOCIATION,

Petitioner

______________________

2024-108

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the Department 

of Veterans Affairs.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Petitioner moves with consent to voluntarily dismiss 

the petition “without prejudice and without fees or costs to 

either side, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b).” ECF No. 52 at 1. 

The court notes that while petitioner requests dismissal without prejudice, it is not the court’s practice to indicate whether dismissal is with or without prejudice.

Upon consideration thereof,

Case: 24-108 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 03/05/2024
2 IN RE: TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS ASSOCIATION

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted to the extent that 

the petition is dismissed.

(2) All other pending motions are denied as moot.

March 5, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

Case: 24-108 Document: 55 Page: 2 Filed: 03/05/2024
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Capella Education Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Lois M. Martin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LOIS M.
MARTIN                            
|Lois M. Martin                                   
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 24, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 29

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-31 Filed 10/09/18 Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean Perrotti, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:January 12,
      2011
                /s/
      Jean PerrottiJean
      PerrottiChief
      Financial Officer AndPrinciple
      Accounting Officer
#### Dora KOHL, Appellant, v. NATIONAL SUPER MARKETS, Respondent.

No. 55146.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 24, 1989.

James F. Koester, St. Louis, for appellant.

James B. Kennedy, St. Louis, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation case, appellant (employee) appeals an award of 35 percent permanent partial disability to her body as a whole. We affirm.

Employee asserts, and we agree, the evidence and medical facts would support an award of permanent and total disability. However, the evidence and medical facts also support the award rendered. We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the Commission. The Commission is the fact finder and has discretion in making its award based upon those facts. *Richardson v. Falcon Products, Inc.,*739 S.W.2d 596, 597 (Mo.App.1987).

On August 6, 1981, employee slipped on grease, fell on the floor and injured her back. She received treatment from time to time until April of 1982, when her coccyx was surgically removed. She continued to be treated from time to time until July 1985, at which time she was in an automobile accident and sustained further injury to her back.

*732Employee’s doctor rated her permanent partial disability at 40 percent of the body as a whole without consideration as to the disability sustained in the automobile accident. Employer’s doctor rated her permanent partial disability at 25 percent of the body as a whole without consideration of the automobile accident.

Employee’s ability to work and labor on the open labor market was a question for the Commission to resolve. We cannot say the Commission abused that discretion. She has worked little since August 6,1981. There was medical testimony she could return to gainful employment on a restricted basis, and apparently the Commission did not give full credence to employee’s testimony as to her disability. The Commission’s award was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.