alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**(1)

**STATEMENT OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ken Owyang, thechief financial officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the “Company”), certify forthe purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the UnitedStates Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i)    the AnnualReport of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|                                       |   | /s/ KEN OWYANG                                                                |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Ken Owyang                                                                         |
|                                  |   | *Chief  Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration* |
| Date:  March 16,  2007 |   |                                                                               |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to SupportSoft, Inc. and willbe retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----

(1)          The material containedin this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before orafter the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specificallyincorporates it by reference.

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-141]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

    Summary: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.
    Summary of Proposal(s):
    (1) Collection title: Statement Regarding Contributions and 
Support.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: G-134.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0099.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: November 30, 1995.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 300.
    (8) Total annual responses: 300.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 92.
    (10) Collection description: Dependency on the employee for one-
half support at the time of the employee's death can be a condition 
affecting eligibility for a survivor annuity provided for under Section 
2 of the Railroad Retirement Act. One-half support is also a condition 
which may negate the public service pension offset in Tier I for a 
spouse or widow(er).
    Additional Information or Comments: Copies of the form and 
supporting documents can be obtained for Chuck Mierzwa, the agency 
clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information 
collection should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement 
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB 
reviewer, Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Ron Hodapp,
Acting Clearance Officer.
FR Doc. 96-141 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1412]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

Application for Recordation of Trade Name: ``Mega Toys''

ACTION: Notice of Application for Recordation of Trade Name.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Application has been filed pursuant to section 133.12, Customs 
Regulations (19 CFR 133.12), for the recordation under section 42 of 
the Act of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1124), of the trade name 
``Mega Toys,'' used by Mega Toys, a corporation organized under the 
laws of the State of California, located at 905 East Second Street, Los 
Angeles, California 90012.
    The application states that the trade name is used in connection 
with games, dolls, party favors, decorative flags, Halloween items, and 
plastic, battery-operated and die-cast toys.
    Before final action is taken on the application, consideration will 
be given to any relevant data, views, or arguments submitted in writing 
by any person in opposition to the recordation of this trade name. 
Notice of the action taken on the application for recordation of this 
trade name will be published in the Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 26, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to U.S. Customs 
Service, Attention: Intellectual Property Rights Branch, 1301 
Constitution Avenue NW. (Franklin Court), Washington, D.C. 20229.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delois P. Johnson, Intellectual 
Property Rights Branch, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW. (Franklin Court), 
Washington, DC 20229 (202-482-6960).

    Dated: January 23, 1996.
John F. Atwood,
Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch.
[FR Doc. 96-1412 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
```
Order filed October 10, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00547

- CV

____________ DEK

- M NATIONWIDE, LT D , Appellant

V.
DAVID HILL D/B/A DOH OIL CO. CASSIE MOSE LEY & DAVID MOSELEY AND COLORADO COUNTY CENTRAL APPRAISAL

DISTRICT, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court

Colorado County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 23,859



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed July 9, 2019. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the c lerk

of this court on or before October 25, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be
dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Just ices Wise and Hassan.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Leroy COLE, Defendant/Appellant. Michael Leroy COLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 66374, 67453.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 8, 1995.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for sexual abuse, § 566.100, RSMo Supp. 1993. The jury recommended a sentence of five years imprisonment plus a fine. The court sentenced defendant in accordance with the jury recommendation, but suspended imposition of the fine. Defendant also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Ride 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

*677We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Peter Strojnik, State Bar No. 6464

STROJNIK P.C.

2375 East Camelback Road Suite 600

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone: (602) 524-6602

ADA@strojnik.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Tempe Hospitality Ventures LLC,

Defendant.

Case No: 2:18-cv-00452-JJT 

Notice of Acceptance of Offer of 

Judgment

Please take notice that Plaintiff accepts the offer of judgment appended hereto as 

Exhibit 1.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 30th day of April, 2018.

STROJNIK, P.C.

Peter Strojnik, 6464

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:18-cv-00452-JJT Document 14 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren,

 Defendant.

 CR 18-223-TUC-RCC (DTF)

 ORDER

 

The Court took certain Motions Under Advisement after hearing from the 

attorneys and now rules as follows: 

The Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of the Conspiracy (Doc. 315) is 

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The telling of the journey from Mexico to the 

United States is no longer relevant, however, what the migrants actually said to the 

defendant is relevant and that can come in. The Court will also allow the playing of the 

video at the gas station since the extent of the migrants’ injury is still an issue in the case. 

The Motion in Limine regarding Evidence of Possible Bias or Prejudice Affecting 

Government Witnesses (Doc. 320) was also taken under advisement. The Court rules that 

the defense will be able to inquire as to the possible bias or prejudice of the government 

witnesses. However, the document that was released by No More Deaths itself will not 

come into evidence and will not go to the jury. 

The Motion in Limine regarding Informed Consent Hypotheticals (Doc. 323) is 

GRANTED. 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 353 Filed 10/18/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Motion in Limine regarding Exercising the Defendant’s Constitutional Rights 

(Doc. 324) is DENIED. 

The Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony Regarding an Advice of Counsel 

Defense (Doc. 327) is DENIED. 

The Motion for Reconsideration of Prior Ruling Regarding Use of Defendant’s 

Prior Testimony for Impeachment (Doc. 328) is DENIED. 

The Motion to Appoint Counsel for Susanna Brown (Doc. 336) is GRANTED. 

The Federal Public Defenders Office is ORDERED to appoint counsel for the witness, 

Susanna Brown. 

The Motion in Limine to Allow Use of Prior Testimony (Doc. 340) is GRANTED. 

The Court finds that unusual circumstances exist to the extent that allowing this 

testimony for its limited purpose in this trial is admissible. 

The Motion to Compel Disclosure of Witness Statements Pursuant to Rule 26.2 

(Doc. 345) is found to be MOOT as the parties have so informed the Court. 

Dated this 18th day of October, 2019.

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 353 Filed 10/18/19 Page 2 of 2
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joshua W. Carden, SBN 021698

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

16427 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 410 

Scottsdale, AZ 85254

joshua@cardenlawfirm.com

(480) 454-1100 

(480) 454-1101 (Fax)

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeremy Thacker,

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC, et al.

Defendants.

No. 2:18-cv-00063-DJH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

The undersigned hereby provides notice of his appearance and designation as lead counsel 

on behalf of Plaintiff Jeremy Thacker in this matter. Please update your records accordingly. 

Note: the undersigned is cooperating with Plaintiff’s former counsel at Jaburg Wilk to 

submit a motion for withdrawal in compliance with LRCiv 83.3. As Dkt. 138 was stricken by 

the Court, this Appearance is filed out of caution to avoid the possibility of missing any ECF 

filings in the meantime. 

Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of May, 2019,

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: s/Joshua W. Carden

Joshua W. Carden

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jeremy Thacker
NOTE             Exhibit 10.24

$300                                                  Date: August 18, 2000


     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,   Archer  Systems  Limited,   Inc.,  the  undersigned
("Payor"),  hereby  promises  to pay to the  order of  Zamora  Funding,  Inc.  a
Delaware  corporation,  ("Holder"),  the  principal  amount of $300.00,  payable
twenty  four (24) months  after the date first set forth  above.  The  principal
amount hereof from time to time  outstanding  shall bear interest at the rate of
six percent (6%) per annum,  payable on the date set forth  above.  All payments
hereunder  shall be in  lawful  money of the  United  States of  America  at the
address of the Holder  hereof or at such  address as shall be  specified  by the
Holder to Archer Systems Limited, Inc.
     If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or principal,  then
the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of its legal rights
to collect  the  balance due unless  within  five (5)  business  days after such
notice the default  shall be cured by Payor.  Such notice  shall be deemed given
three (3) days after having been  deposited in the United  States Mail  properly
addressed  and  sent by  registered  mail to the  particular  addressee,  return
receipt requested.

     Prepayments may be made in this note  voluntarily at any time and from time
to time, without penalty.



                                            Archer Systems Limited, Inc.


                                            BY:/s/Richard Margulies
                                            -----------------------
                                                  Richard Margulies
                                                  President



                                        2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Spirit Master Funding X LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Tennessee Ventures-Knoxville LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00330-PHX-JAT

ORDER 

 “Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge=s first duty in every 

case.” Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 

(7th Cir. 2003). In this case, the complaint fails to sufficiently plead jurisdiction. See 28 

U.S.C. ' 1332; Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th 

Cir. 2006) (discussing the citizenship of a limited liability company). 

 Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that, by February 9, 2018, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to 

the complaint properly alleging the citizenship of each party (and shall clarify the correct 

name of any d/b/a) or this case will be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of federal 

subject matter jurisdiction. 

 Dated this 1st day of February, 2018.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

 

The Board of Directors 

NYMEX Holdings, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-145758) on Form S-8 of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports datedFebruary 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial 

reporting as of December 31, 2007, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

New York, New York 

February 29 , 2008
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Joe Loeppky, President, Secretary, Treasurer
and Director of Search By Headlines.com Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)          
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Search By Headlines.com Corp. for the
quarterly period ended January 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Search By
Headlines.com Corp.

Dated: March 16, 2007



/s/ Joe
LoeppkyJoe LoeppkyPresident, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Search By
Headlines.com Corp. and will be retained by Search By Headlines.com Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the report of Fuqi International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/  Yu
      Kwai ChongYu
      Kwai ChongChairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerNovember
      9, 2009





/s/  Ching
      Wan WongChing
      Wan WongChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      9, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fuqi International, Inc. and will be retained by Fuqi International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HPT Suite Properties Trust, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-18-00388-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to Dismiss with 

Prejudice (Doc. 17). 

 Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED approving the Stipulation (Doc. 17) and dismissing this action in 

its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this action. 

 Dated this 14th day of May, 2018. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00388-DJH Document 18 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14783]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 96-13]


Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. and Astro Holdings, Inc.; Holt Hauling 
and Warehousing Systems, Inc. v. Delaware River Port Authority; Port of 
Philadelphia and Camden; Philadelphia Regional Port Authority, and 
Pasha Auto Warehousing, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Complaint and 
Assignment

    Notice is given that a complaint filed by Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. 
and Astro Holdings, Inc.; Holt Hauling and Warehousing Systems, Inc. 
(``Complainants'') against Delaware River Port Authority; Port of 
Philadelphia and Camden; Philadelphia Regional Port Authority, and 
Pasha Auto Warehousing, Inc. (``Respondents'') was served June 5, 1996. 
Complainants allege that Respondents have violated, and continue to 
violate, sections 10(a) (3) (b)(11), (b)(12) and (d)(1) of the Shipping 
Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. Secs. 1709 (a)(3), (b)(11), (b)(12) and 
(d)(1), by failing to operate under an agreement according to its 
terms, and engaging in voluminous unreasonable and discriminatory 
practices to reduce Complainants' competitiveness, to exclude 
Complainants from the port, and to take over and operate Complainants' 
business enterprises at the Ports of Philadelphia and Camden.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the office of Administrative 
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence 
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after 
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer 
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing 
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of 
the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine 
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the 
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. 
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of 
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by June 5, 
1997, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by 
October 3, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14783 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
NO. 07-05-0350-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 20, 2006

______________________________

SHAWN FULLER,

Appellant

V.

SCOTT COWAN,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2004-595,916; HON. PAULA DAVIS LANEHART, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

 _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Appellant Shawn Fuller and appellee Scott Cowan, by and through their attorneys,

have moved to dismiss this appeal due to all matters having been resolved between the

parties. Without passing on the merits of the cases, we grant the motions pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed

the appeal at the request of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam