alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 46 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 365 

[Report No. 111–87] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2009 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of April 28, 2009, providing 

6 for consideration or disposition of a conference report to 

7 accompany the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 365 RH 

1 setting forth the congressional budget for the United 

2 States Government for fiscal year 2010, revising the ap3 propriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, and setting 

4 forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 

5 2011 through 2014. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 46 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 365 

[Report No. 111–87] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluAPRIL 27, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Platon Tzouvalis, Chief Executive Officer of Acrongenomics
Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the
      year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.                                                              

Date: April 14, 2010

| | /s/
      Platon Tzouvalis   
| | -----------------------------
| | Platon Tzouvalis             
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Acrongenomics
Inc. and will be retained by Acrongenomics Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ Joseph L. WelchJoseph L. WelchPresident and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Edward M. RahillEdward M. RahillSenior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1346]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 122.8-4(d)) on a quarterly basis. 
This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loans. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 6\1/4\ percent for the January-March quarter of FY 
96.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 108.503-8(b)(4), the maximum legal interest rate 
for a commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a project 
(see 13 CFR 108.503-4) shall be the greater of 6 percent over the New 
York prime rate or the limitation established by the constitution or 
laws of a given State. The initial rate for a fixed rate loan shall be 
the legal rate for the term of the loan.
John R. Cox,
Associate Administrator for Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-1346 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
Case 2:99-mj-05390-MS Document 3 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8082
In Re: ELVIN PORTER, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-92-426-A) Submitted: January 2, 1996 Decided: March 11, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elvin Porter, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Elvin Porter petitions for a writ of mandamus, complaining of delay in the district court. On June 24, 1994, Porter filed a motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence underFed. R. Crim. P. 33. On July 25, 1994, Porter filed motions to proceed in forma pauperis, to dismiss the indictments, and for production of documents. On February 16, 1995, a partial transcript of the district court's proceedings of December 11, 1992, was filed. On August 28, 1995, Porter filed this mandamus action alleging that the district court had failed to make a dispositive ruling on his motion for a new trial.Because the district court's docket sheet reveals that transcripts of Porter's criminal proceedings had been filed C presumably so that the district court could evaluate Porter's claim of newly discovered evidence C just over six months prior to the time Porter filed this mandamus petition, we find there has been no undue delay by the district court in acting upon the motion for a new trial. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief without prejudice to Porter's right to file another petition if the district court does not act expeditiously.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-44438, 333-36995 and 333-70475) pertaining to the1997 Stock Plan, Company Share Option Plan, 1997 Director's Option Plan and 1997Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Indus International, Inc. of our report datedJanuary 30, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of IndusInternational, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.
									/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Francisco, CaliforniaMarch 14, 2001
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BLUEBIRD EXPLORATION COMPANY

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, of Bluebird Exploration Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the undersigned, Mark Fingarson, President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial officer, of Bluebird Exploration Company, does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to                    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bluebird Exploration Company

| Date: December 1, 2008 | /s/ Mark Fingarson |
|------------------------|--------------------|

|   | Mark Fingarson |
|--------|----------------|

|   | President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14011]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Pubic Notice No. 2399]


Notice of Briefing

    The Department of State announces the second 1996 briefing on U.S. 
foreign policy economic sanctions programs to be held on Thursday, July 
11, 1995, from 2:00 p.m. until 3:30 p.m., in the State Department Loy 
Henderson auditorium, 2201 C Street NW., Washington, D.C.
    This briefing, a follow-on session to the March 6 briefing hosted 
by Under Secretary for Economic, Business and Agricultural Affairs Joan 
Spero, will be hosted by Ambassador Bill Ramsay, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Energy Sanctions and Commodities, who will present an 
overview of the sanctions regimes overseen by the State Department's 
Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs. State Department desk officers 
will be on hand to discuss country-specific sanctions issues following 
Mr. Ramsay's briefing.

    Please Note: Persons intending to attend the July 11 briefing 
must announce this not later than 48 hours before the briefing, and 
preferably further in advance, to the Department of State by sending 
a fax to 202-647-3953 (Office of the Coordinator for Business 
Affairs). The announcement must include name, company or association 
name, Social Security or passport number and date of birth. The 
above includes government and non-government attendees. One of the 
following valid photo ID's will be required for admittance: U.S. 
driver's license with picture, passport, U.S. government ID (company 
ID's are no longer accepted by Diplomatic Security). Enter from the 
C Street Main Lobby.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
David A. Ruth,
Senior Coordinator for Business Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-14011 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
#### Brad William FRICKE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Holly Sue FRICKE, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65788.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 31, 1995.

Gael D. Wood, James W. McGettigan, Jr., Eckelkamp, Eckelkamp, Wood, and Kuenzel, Washington, for appellant.

Cynthia Eckelkamp, Eckelkamp & Wit-thaus, Union, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment, in mother’s action for modification of a February 19, 1984, dissolution decree, ordering an increase in the amount of father’s child support obligation and ordering father to pay mother’s attorney’s fees for the modification action. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit
31.1
 
 Section
302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
 
 I, Mark
Fingarson, certify that:
 
 1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bluebird Exploration
Company.
 
 2.   Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances   under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;
 
 3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;
 
 4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this
quarterly  report(the  "Evaluation Date");
and
 
 c)   presented
in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.
 
 6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material
weaknesses.
 
 
 Date:
November 20, 2008
 
 
 /s/ Mark
Fingarson
 Mark
Fingarson
 Chief
Executive Officer and
 Chief
Financial Officer
#### Orlando SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67374.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 30, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 14, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and GRIMM, C.J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Orlando Smith, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Kenneth & Loberia MYERS, Respondents, v. John & Nedra AYERS, Appellants.

No. WD 48033.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 15, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied June 21, 1994.

Bruce B. Brown, Kearney, for appellants.

Thomas D. Munro, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before BERREY, P.J., and KENNEDY and ELLIS, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

*ORDER*

Appeal from judgment for unlawful detain-er.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Luis Carlos Aguirre, 

Defendant.

No. CR-17-50231-PHX-GMS

DETENTION ORDER 

 In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of 

detention was addressed at a hearing on January 2, 2018. The Court was informed that 

the defendant is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time. 

 The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to 

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such 

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to 

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The 

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court 

proceeding. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of 

this detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion 

for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third 

party custodian. 

 Dated this 2nd day of January, 2018.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OFTHE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDERTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT, AS AMENDED

 

I, Michael J. Sullivan,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of IHS Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has material affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March 28, 2008

 
| /s/ Michael J. Sullivan                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Sullivan                                   |   |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Synova Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  April 5, 2006                           /s/ Robert L. Edwards
       ----------------------------            ---------------------------------
                                               Robert L. Edwards
                                               Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.