alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1428]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore Advisory Commission; 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for the forthcoming meeting of 
the Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore Advisory Commission. Notice 
of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463).

MEETING DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 15, 1996; 9:30 a.m. until 12 noon.

ADDRESS: Glen Arbor Township Hall, 6394 W. Western, Glen Arbor, 
Michigan.

AGENDA TOPICS INCLUDE: The Chairman's welcome; minutes of the previous 
meeting; update on park activities; old business; new business; public 
input; next meeting date; adjournment. The meeting is open to the 
public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Advisory Commission was established by 
the law that established the Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 
P.L. 91-479. The purpose of the commission, according to its charter, 
is to advise the Secretary of the Interior with respect to matters 
relating to the administration, protection, and development of the 
Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, including the establishment of 
zoning by-laws, construction, and administration of scenic roads, 
procurement of land, condemnation of commercial property, and the 
preparation and implementation of the land and water use management 
plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Sleeping Bear Dunes, 
Ivan Miller, 9922 Front Street, Empire, Michigan 49630; or telephone 
616-326-5134.

    Dated: January 16, 1996.
William W. Schenk,
Field Director, Midwest Field Area.
[FR Doc. 96-1428 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Wilson sporting goods co. de mexico, sa. De cv.

WILSON                     order to buy
LOGO
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        DELIVER GOODS TO:                               INVOICE GOODS
PROVIDER:  TAIMEX INDUSTRIES
SA DE CV                                CENTRAL DISTRIBUTION WILSON                 WILSON SPORTING GOODS
DOMICILE   CARR FRESNILLO-PLATEROS      LAGO TANA NO. 43 BADEGA 2                   DE MEXICO SA DE CV
           PARQUE INDUSTRIALES KM 2     COL. HUICHIPOAN C.P. 11290 MEXICO D.F.      AV. CONST NO. 1000
           CP 99059                     DELEGATION MIGUEL HIDALGO                   COL LOMAS ALTAS CP
TEL:       (493) 268-00                 TEL AND FAX 399 83 10                       11950 MEXICO DF
FAX:       (493) 268-06                 BENJAMIN ESPINOZA                           REPRESENTATIVE:____
CONTACT    (NAME)                                                                   TEL 259 42 42
CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT: 33 DAYS                                                      FAX 257 19 05

<S>     <C>       <C>           <C>       <C>    <C>        <C>        <C>    <C>      <C>             <C>



--------- ----- ------------- ----------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- --------- ------------ -----------
CODE      NO    DESCRIPTION   QUANTITY    STD.    TOTAL      PESOS   UNIT    TOTAL     DATE OF      DATE OF
                                          PACK    CARTONS            COST    COST      SHIPMENT     ENTRY
--------- ----- ------------- ----------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- --------- ------------ -----------
--------- ----- ------------- ----------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- --------- ------------ -----------

-------- ----- ------------- ----------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- --------- ------------ -----------
                      TOTAL

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. George KYLES, Defendant/Appellant. George KYLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 61570, 63584.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 21, 1993.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky 0. Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Before CRANDALL, C.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of possession of a controlled substance, heroin, in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Supp. 1992. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a seven year prison term. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential *675value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 4.1(d)

WAIVER AND CONSENT

THIS WAIVER AND CONSENT
is entered into this 28thday of February, 2008, by and among Wolverine Asset Management LLC (WAM), on its own behalf and on
behalf of its affiliates. Wolverine Convertible Arbitrage Fund Trading Ltd. and GPC LX LLC (collectively, Wolverine) and Star Energy Corporation (Star).

WHEREAS, Wolverine has entered into that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of February 9, 2007 (the Purchase
Agreement), by and among Star Energy Corporation (Star) and certain purchasers referenced therein (each, a Purchaser, collectively, the Purchasers), such Purchasers being WAM and
Enable Capital Management (each of Star, Wolverine and Enable Capital Management may hereafter be referred to as a Party, collectively, the Parties);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Parties entered into certain related documents, instruments, agreements and notes dated as
of February 9, 2007, among them a Registration Rights Agreement, a Security Agreement, a Subsidiary Guarantee, and an 8% Secured Convertible Debenture (the Debenture) issued by Star to each of Wolverine and Enable
(collectively, the Convertible Debt Documents);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2(a) of the Debenture,
April 1, 2008, constitutes an Interest Payment Date, whereupon quarterly interest is payable on indebtedness due under the Debenture;

WHEREAS, Star has requested that Wolverine agree to the deferral of interest that would otherwise be due on April 1, 2008, until April 1, 2009;

WHEREAS, Wolverine is willing to agree to a deferral of the aforementioned interest payment on the terms and conditions set forth herein;

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,

1. Wolverine consents to the following:

(a)
the deferral of the interest payment due on April 1, 2008, until April 1, 2009; and

(b) the waiver by Wolverine of any Late Fees
that would otherwise be due under Section 2(d) of the Debenture as a result of the non-payment of interest on April 1, 2008.

2.
In consideration of the waiver and consent of Wolverine referenced in Section 1 above, on April 1, 2009. Star will pay Wolverine a premium of Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000) on such date.



---

3. Except as to matters set forth herein, the terms and conditions of all of the Convertible Debt
Documents remain in full force and effect.

4. This Waiver and Consent is governed by the laws of the State of New York, notwithstanding
its conflict of laws rules or any other principles that would trigger the application of any other law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of
Wolverine and Star has caused this Waiver and Consent to be duly executed on the day and year first written above.



WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCon its own behalf and as Managing Member and InvestmentManager of Wolverine Convertible Arbitrage Fund TradingLtd. and GPC LX LLCBy:

LOGOName:

Andrew SujdakTitle:

Managing DirectorSTAR ENERGY CORPORATIONBy:

LOGOName:

Michael KravchenkoTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 57 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 57 Filed 07/17/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 57 Filed 07/17/18 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23.1

BEDINGER & COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

BEDINGER & COMPANY
1200 CONCORD AVENUE, SUITE 250
CONCORD, CA 94520

JUNE 6, 2005

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby  consent to use in this Form  10-KSB  (Restated)  of our report  dated
December 16, 2004, (except for Note M, which is dated May 20, 2005), relating to
the financial  statements of Superclick,  Inc. (A Development Stage Company) for
the years  ended  October  31,  2004 and 2003 and for the period from August 24,
2000 (Date of Inception) to October 31, 2004.

                                                   Bedinger & Company
                                                   Certified Public Accountants
H. Res. 686 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 14, 2009. 

Whereas the United States Constitution is the fundamental 

law of the United States; 

Whereas people in the United States of all ages, income levels, and political beliefs fail tests of civic literacy; 

Whereas a 1998 survey revealed that more teenagers knew 

who the ‘‘Fresh Prince of Bel-Air’’ was than the Chief 

Justice of the Supreme Court, more knew the star of the 

motion picture ‘‘Titanic’’ than who was the vice president 

of the United States, and more can name the Three 

Stooges and the 3 American Idol judges than can name 

the 3 branches of government; 

Whereas fewer than half of all people in the United States 

can name the three branches of the United States Government; 

Whereas students at top colleges and universities in the 

United States scored an average of only 59.4 percent for 

seniors and 56.6 percent for freshmen on tests of civic 

literacy; 

Whereas people in the United States aged 25 to 34 score an 

average of 46 percent on a test of civic literacy and people aged 65 and over score the same 46 percent; 
2 

•HRES 686 EH 

Whereas research shows that an increase in civic knowledge, 

including that of the United States Constitution, almost 

invariably leads to the beneficial use of that knowledge; 

and 

Whereas research shows that greater civic learning leads to 

more active citizenship, and people in the United States 

who fulfill their civic obligations beyond voting are more 

knowledgeable about their country’s history and institutions: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that— 

(1) all high school seniors across the country should 

spend at least one week learning about the United 

States Constitution in September of their senior year, as 

knowledge of this historic document, which constitutes 

the very foundation of our country, is critical to being 

an effective citizen; and 

(2) upon reaching voting age, high school seniors 

should engage in civic learning activities on an issue of 

importance to them to demonstrate their understanding 

of their rights and responsibilities as citizens of the 

United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 Exhibit 10.30



Summary description of the Company Bonus Plan and Company Profit Sharing Plan:

     The Company has adopted a bonus incentive plan effective for fiscal year
2001. Certain management and technical employees are eligible for bonuses under
the plan. Bonuses under this plan will be based on two principal factors,
namely, the Company's financial performance relative to plan, measured by
Adjusted EBITDA, and the extent to which the Company has reached customer
satisfaction goals as measured by a quarterly customer survey. Eligible
employees will receive target bonuses to the extent these goals are reached.
Such bonuses will increase up to double the originally proposed amount to the
extent that financial performance exceeds plan by up to 15% and customer survey
results exceed original targets. If and to the extent that financial performance
falls short of plan or customer satisfaction ratings fail to meet target levels
established during the first quarter of 2001, bonuses will be less than
originally proposed or may not be awarded.

     The Company has also revised its profit sharing plan to provide that
eligible employees will receive profit sharing awards of up to five percent
of compensation based on the same Company financial performance and customer
satisfaction goals outlined above. Such awards will increase up to double the
original amount to the extent that financial performance exceeds plan by up
to 15% and customer survey results exceed the original targets. If and to the
extent that financial performance falls short of plan or customer satisfaction
ratings fail to meet target levels established during the first quarter of 2001,
awards will be less than originally proposed or may not be awarded.



                                       16
Case 2:17-mj-00461-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00461-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00461-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00461-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Rackable Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended April 4, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mark J. Barrenechea, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James D. Wheat, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.

Dated: May 13, 2009



|                                      |  |  |  |                                       
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Mark J. Barrenechea               |  |  |  | /s/ James D. Wheat                    
|Mark J. Barrenechea CEO and
President |  |  |  | James D. Wheat Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
#### Lawrence J. KROHR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68958.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 16, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In his Rule 24.035 motion, defendant alleges his trial counsel failed to interview certain witnesses. The motion court denied his motion without conducting a hearing. He now contends the motion court erred in denying his motion without a hearing.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*501The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

The undersigned, Jin Hu, the
Chief Financial Officer of China TMK Battery Systems Inc. (the Company), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this statement this
16th day of August,
2010.

/s/ Jin
HuJin HuChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and will be retained by
China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Theiss Faison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                           
|-------------- |  | --------------------------
|March 26, 2008 |  | /s/ Margaret Theiss Faison
|               |  | Margaret Theiss Faison    
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27098-27099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13559]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.43(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on April 25, 1996, Lonza 
Riverside, 900 River Road, Conchohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made 
application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Drug                               Schedule  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-Methoxyamphetamine (7411)...............................            I 
Amphetamine (1100)........................................           II 
Phenylacetone (8501)......................................           II 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in 
bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application.

[[Page 27099]]

    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistance Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than July 29, 1996.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-13559 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, Orpheus WARREN, Defendant/Appellant. Orpheus WARREN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 64569, 68146.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-waived case, the trial court found defendant guilty of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1994, felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1994, and first degree property damage, § 569.100, RSMo 1994. The court sentenced him as a persistent offender to fifteen years for burglary and fifteen years for stealing, concurrently. In addition, it sentenced him to five years for property damage, consecutive to the fifteen year sentences.

Defendant appeals. His only point alleges insufficiency of the evidence. We have carefully examined the transcript. The evidence is sufficient, if not overwhelming. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

*468Defendant also filed a Rule 29.15 motion. Following a hearing, the court denied the motion. Defendant appealed, however, his brief does not contain any point concerning the denial. Defendant has therefore abandoned that appeal and the motion court’s order is affirmed.