alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Schedule
      10.16**


Purchasers








1.  PFK
      Acquisition Group, LLC executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant
      Purchase Agreement as of February 21, 2006.





2.  Alfred
      F.
      Bracher, executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of February 14, 2006.





3.  Howard
      Goldberg executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 13, 2006.





4.  Thomas
      A.
      Nicolette executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 24, 2006.





5.  Real
      Path, Inc. executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of February 14, 2006.





6.  Robert
      Schachter Trust, Diane Schachter, Trustee executed the Senior Secured
      Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement as of February 7, 2006.





7.  Harvey
      Goldberg executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 24, 2006.





8.  Larry
      Chimerine executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 21, 2006.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 (the
Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              
|--------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat
|Aviv Efrat    
|August 4, 2010
Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2008



 Exhibit 10(e)(16) 
 Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2008 (“2008 APIP”) 
 Under the 2008 APIP, executive officers of the Company are
eligible to receive performance related cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if annual performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) are met. 
 The Committee approved an annual incentive target and maximum opportunity for 2008, expressed as a percentage of base salary for each participating officer.
Certain additional goals were established for some officers based on business unit goals. The Committee also established overall threshold, target and maximum measures of performance for the 2008 APIP. The performance measures and weightings for
2008 were constant currency revenue growth (30%), earnings per share (40%) and core cash flow from operations (30%). 
 For 2008, the performance
against the 2008 APIP goals was as follows: Constant currency revenue growth was below threshold, and on an adjusted basis, earnings per share and core cash flow from operations were above threshold and below target.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Theiss Faison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                           
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|               |  | 
|March 26, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Margaret Theiss Faison
|               |  |  |  | Margaret Theiss Faison    
|               |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
        32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL ADVANCE CORP. (the “Company”) On
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Judah Steinberger, Chief
      Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





iii.  The
      certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) or Rule
      15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).





iv.  A
      certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
      purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
      liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
      incorporates it by reference.




/s/
              Judah
              SteinbergerJudah
                Steinberger
              (Principal
                Fiancial Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Wardell BEAN, Defendant/Appellant. Wardell BEAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 65815, 68853.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 23, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John W. Simon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986, and stealing $150 or more, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00259-JJT Document 15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 9 of 9
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14107]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of June 3, 10, 17, and 24, 1996.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of June 3

Thursday, June 6
    3:30 p.m.--Affirmation Session (PUBLIC MEETING) (if needed)

Week of June 10--Tentative

Wednesday, June 12
    3:00 p.m.--Briefing on Part 100 Final Rule on Reactor Site 
Criteria (PUBLIC MEETING) (Contact: Charles Ader, 301-415-5622)
    4:30 p.m.--Affirmation Session (PUBLIC MEETING) (if needed)

Week of June 17--Tentative

Tuesday, June 18
    10:00 a.m.--Briefing on Status of NRC Operator Licensing Initial 
Examination Pilot Process (PUBLIC MEETING) (Contact: Stuart 
Richards, 301-415-1031)
    11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (PUBLIC MEETING) (if needed)

Week of June 24--Tentative

Tuesday, June 25
    10:00 a.m.--Briefing on Operating Reactors and Fuel Facilities 
(PUBLIC MEETING)
Wednesday, June 26
    11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (PUBLIC MEETING) (if needed)
    2:30 p.m.--Meeting with Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste 
(ACNW) (PUBLIC MEETING)

    * The schedule for commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Bill Hill (301) 415-
1661.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1963).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0869646a48667a6b266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2948454b69475b4a074e465f">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#23444857634d51400d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d5a56497d534f5e135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.
* * * * *
William M. Hill, Jr.,
SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14107 Filed 5-31-96; 2:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rajesh Raniga, Chief Financial Officer of EYI Industries, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the year ended
      December 31, 2005, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit
      32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



By:    /s/ signed

       -----------------------------------------------
Name:  Rajesh Raniga

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 31, 2006



 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2530-2531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1431]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission; Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for the forthcoming meeting of 
the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission. Notice of this meeting 
is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-
463).

MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 12, 1996, 12 noon until 5 p.m.; 
February 13, 1996, 8 a.m, until 5 p.m.

ADDRESS: Radisson Hotel Saint Paul, 350 Market Street, St. Paul, 
Minnesota 55102.

    This meeting replaces the postponed January 9 and 10, 1996, meeting 
in St. Paul, Minneapolis. This business meeting will be open to the 
public. Space and facilities to accommodate members of the public are 
limited and persons will be accomodated on a first-come, first-served 
basis. The Chairman will permit attendees to address the Commision on 
Tuesday, February 13, 1996, beginning at 1 p.m. An agenda will be 
available from the National Park Service, Midwest Field Area, one week 
prior to the meeting.


[[Page 2531]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan M. Hutchings, Assistant Field Director, Planning, Legislation, and 
WASO Coordination, National Park Service, Midwest Field Area, 1709 
Jackson Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102, or call 402-221-3082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mississippi River Corridor Study 
Commission was etablished by Public Law 101-398, September 29, 1990.

    Dated: January 16, 1996.
William W. Schenk,
Field Director, Midwest Field Area.
[FR Doc. 96-1431 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-143]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Condit Project No. 2342-WA]


PacifiCorp Electric Operations; Notice of Intent To Hold Public 
Meeting in White Salmon, Washington, To Discuss the Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement (DEIS) for Relicensing of the Condit Hydroelectric 
Project

December 29, 1995.
    On December 8, 1995, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for 
the Condit Hydroelectric Project was distributed to all parties on the 
Commission's mailing list and a notice of availability was published in 
the Federal Register. The DEIS evaluates the environmental consequences 
of the proposed relicensing of the project. The project is located in 
Skamania and Klickitat counties, Washington.
    Two public meetings have been scheduled to be held in White Salmon, 
Washington, for the purpose of allowing Commission Staff to present the 
major DEIS findings and recommendations. Interested parties will have 
an opportunity to give oral comment on the DEIS for the Commission's 
public record. Comments will be recorded by a court reporter. 
Individuals will be given up to five minutes each to present their 
views on the DEIS.
    Meeting Dates & Times: Monday, February 5 from 7:00 pm-11:00 pm, 
Tuesday, February 6 from 9:30 am-3:00 pm.
    Location: Both meetings will be held at the Park Center Auditorium, 
170 NW Lincoln Street, White Salmon, Washington (the main entrance to 
the auditorium is from Washington Street).
    Comments may also be submitted in writing, addressed to Lois D. 
Cashell, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. Reference should be clearly made to 
the Condit Project, No. 2342. All comments must be received by February 
21, 1996.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-143 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Kevin JAKOUBEC, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Warren SMOCK and Sharon Smock, dba S & S Heating and Cooling, Defendants/Appellants.

No. 68175.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

March 26, 1996.

Kénneth J. Rothman, S. Todd Hamby, St. Louis, for appellants.

Russell B. Mead, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., FLANIGAN, Senior Judge, and HOFF, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant tenants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff landowner in the amount of $4,035.00 on his action to recover damages for physical damage to the rented premises. We affirm.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law *400appears. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1138 NORTH ALMA SCHOOL ROAD, SUITE 101

MESA, ARIZONA 85201

Telephone: 480.461.5300 | Fax: 480.833.9392

David R. Schwartz - #009264

das@udallshumway.com

Kimberly R. Davis - # 030210

krd@udallshumway.com

Attorneys for Defendant Maricopa County

Community College District, Wise and Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cindi Tanner, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

Maricopa County Community College 

District, a political subdivision of Arizona; 

Maria Wise, an individual and in her 

official capacity; Vivian MirandaStrawbridge, an individual and in her 

official capacity,

Defendants.

NO. CV-18-00377-PHX-SPL

STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 

WAGE CLAIMS

Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice, each 

party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs, of Plaintiff’s claims as an employee for 

wages, and related damages, attorney’s fees and/or costs, during her employment with

Defendant Maricopa County Community College District. The parties, therefore, 

stipulate to dismissal of the Fourth Claim for Relief of the Complaint (Dkt 1-1, ex. A, 

Complaint). Although this stipulation does not resolve all claims, the parties further 

stipulate that this Court enter an order with finality language under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 54(b) to effectuate this stipulation as there will be no just reason for delay of 

Case 2:18-cv-00377-SPL Document 23 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

entry of the Order. The parties have approved of the form of Order submitted 

contemporaneously herewith.

Counsel for Plaintiff has authorized defense counsel to e-sign and file this 

Stipulation and to lodge the form of Order.

DATED: April 16, 2018.

UDALL SHUMWAY PLC

/s/ David R. Schwartz 

David R. Schwartz 

1138 North Alma School Road

Suite 101

Mesa, AZ 85201

Attorneys for Defendant Maricopa County

Community College District, Wise and Miranda

TORRES LAW GROUP, PLLC 

James E. Barton II /s/ by David R. Schwartz 

Israel G. Torres

James E. Barton, II

Saman Golestan

2239 W. Baseline Rd.

Tempe, AZ 85283

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 16, 2018, I electronically filed the attached document 

using ECF for filing and transmitted the document through ECF to the following 

registered ECF users:

Israel G. Torres

James E. Barton, II

Saman Golestan

TORRES LAW GROUP, PLLC

2239 W. Baseline Rd.

Tempe, AZ 85283

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ Kimberly Kershner

5136187.1

109883.022

Case 2:18-cv-00377-SPL Document 23 Filed 04/16/18 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,442-01

EX PARTE LUPE MARTINEZ III, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 13-11-00225CRF-A IN THE 81ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM FRIO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). On October 23, 2014, Applicant pleaded no

contest to possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver and was sentenced to seven

years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

AfterApplicant was convicted, trial counsel prepared a two-page handwritten application for

a writ of habeas corpus. On November 12, 2015, the trial judge signed this application and wrote

the following: “The writ is granted. The October 23, 2014 judgment is set aside and the parties

returned to the position they were in prior to the plea.” The State agreed to this and also signed the
2

application. On November 12, 2015, the trial judge also signed an order dismissing the charges in

this cause. The Frio County District Clerk forwarded the handwritten application to this Court and

later forwarded a supplemental application filed on the prescribed form for Article 11.07

applications. As we understand the record, Applicant filed this supplemental application because

his initial one failed to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.1(a)

(“Prescribed Form. An application filed under Article 11.07 must be on the form prescribed by the

Court of Criminal Appeals”).

We now dismiss this application for noncompliance. Applicant’s third and fourth grounds

in his supplemental application are not stated on the prescribed form. “Rule 73.1 requires an

applicant to state the grounds for relief and the supporting facts on the prescribed form.” Ex parte

Blacklock, 191 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.1(c).

If Applicant intended to file his initial handwritten application under Article 11.07, as we

understand the record, we remind the trial judge that only this Court has the authority to grant relief

on an application for a writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.07. See Ex parte Ybarra, 629 S.W.2d

943, 946–47 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982) (Under Article 11.07 “[o]nly the Court of Criminal Appeals

has the authority to grant relief as a result of post conviction writ of habeas corpus”). We also note

that after final conviction in a felony case, other than one in which the death penalty is imposed,

Article 11.07 is the exclusive procedure and “any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and

effect in discharging the prisoner.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 5. Therefore, the trial

judge’s order dismissing the charges in this cause was of no force in discharging Applicant.

This application is dismissed.
3

Filed: February 10, 2016

Do not publish