alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14475]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Multimedia Services Affiliate Forum, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 20, 1996, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Multimedia Services 
Affiliate Forum, Inc. (``MSAF'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the 
nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are: 
AT&T Corporation, New York; Bellcore, Morristown, NJ; Bell Global 
Solutions, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA; British Telecommunications plc, 
London, ENGLAND; Cisco Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA; CompuServe, 
Columbus, OH; DaCom, Seoul, SOUTH KOREA; Deutsche Telekom AG, Bonn, 
GERMANY; Electronic Trade Center, Ltd., Helsinki, FINLAND; Folio 
Corporation, Provo, UT; France Telecom, Paris, FRANCE; GTE Telephone 
Operations, Irvin, TX; IBM, Armonk, NY; ITK Telekommunikations AG, 
Dortmund, GERMANY; Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JAPAN; Korea 
Telecom, Seoul, KOREA; Lexis-Nexis, Dayton, OH; Lotus Development 
Corporation, Cambridge, MA; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA; Novell, 
Inc., Orem, UT; NTT Corporation, Toyko, JAPAN; NTT Data, Tokyo, JAPAN; 
Siemens-Nixdorf, Munich, GERMANY; Singapore Telecommunications, 
Singapore, MALAYSIA; Telecom Italia, Rome, ITALY; Telecom Malaysia 
Berhad, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA; Telstra Corporation, Sydney, New South 
Wales, AUSTRALIA; and Unisource N.V., Hooffdorp, NETHERLANDS.
    MASF's purpose is to promote, improve and facilitate the 
interconnectivity and interoperability of network-based multimedia 
services through researching, evaluating and establishing 
interconnectivity and interoperability specifications for new and 
emerging multimedia technologies and servcie.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-14475 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN CPAs (ISR), INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8, File No. 333-37804), pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, File No. 333-55958), pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000 Employee StockPurchase Plan; the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-67070), pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan; the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-86878), pertaining to theSecond Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-105216), pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Employee andConsultant Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-113838), pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000Employee Stock Purchase Plan, each of Vyyo Inc., of our report dated February 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vyyo Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/    KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN CPAs(ISR) 

        A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited 

 

Tel Aviv, Israel 

February 9, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27386-27387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13600]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and 
respondent burden, the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) invites 
the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on this 
information collection. This request for comment is being made pursuant 
to the

[[Page 27387]]

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13; 44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Comments should address the accuracy of the burden 
estimates and ways to minimize the burden including the use of 
automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of 
information technology, as well as other relevant aspects of the 
information collection.

DATES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposal for the 
collection of information should be received by no later than July 30, 
1996.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Nancy J. Kessinger, Veterans 
Benefits Administration (20M30), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. All comments will become a 
matter of public record and will be summarized in the VBA request for 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. In this document the 
VBA is soliciting comments concerning the following information 
collection:
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0016.
    Title and Form Number: Claim for Disability Insurance Benefits,VA 
Form 29-357.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Need and Uses: The form is used by the policyholder to claim 
disability insurance benefits on National Service Life Insurance and 
United States Government Life Insurance policies.
    Current Actions: The information collected on the form is used by 
the VBA personnel to establish the insured's eligibility for disability 
insurance benefits
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 14,175 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 1 hour and 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 8,100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form should be directed to Department of Veterans 
Affairs, Attn: Jacquie McCray, Information Management Service (045A4), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20420, telephone (202) 273-8032 or FAX (202) 273-5981.

    Dated: May 14, 1996.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 96-13600 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28597-28598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14058]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Correction

    On March 4, 1996, a Notice of Application for Johnson Matthey, Inc. 
(Johnson Matthey), Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte Drive, 
West Deptford, New Jersey 08066, was published in the Federal Register 
requesting registration as a bulk manufacturer of Schedules I and II 
controlled substances. See 61 FR 8303. The notice invited that comments 
or objections be filed by May 3, 1996. A correction was subsequently 
published on April 10, 1996, adding dihydrocodeine (9120) and 
meperidine (9230) to the list of controlled substances that Johnson 
Matthey made application to manufacture in bulk. See 61 FR 15974. 
Comments regarding Johnson Matthey's application for dihydrocodeine and 
meperidine must be filed by June 10, 1996.
    It has come to the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) 
attention that Johnson Matthey does not wish to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of meperidine. Therefore, meperidine is hereby deleted 
from the list of controlled substances for which Johnson Matthey made 
application to manufacture in bulk. However, the list of controlled 
substances for which Johnson Matthey has applied to manufacture in bulk 
should have included thebaine (9333) and alfentanil (9737).

[[Page 28598]]

    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture thebaine and alfentanil may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the above application.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than (60 days from publication).

    Dated: May 28, 1996.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-14058 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Host Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements  of  Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  November 14, 2005


/s/ William Stewart
---------------------------------------
William Stewart, Principal Financial Officer
H. Res. 548 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 16, 2009. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and 

they are hereby, elected to the following standing committee 

of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. McKeon to rank 

before Mr. Bartlett; and Mr. Platts. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Charles A. Carroll, President and Chief Executive Officer of Goodman Global, Inc. (the Registrant) and Lawrence M. Blackburn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Registrants Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the period covered by the
Periodic Report and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Charles A. CarrollCharles A. CarrollPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Lawrence M. BlackburnLawrence M. BlackburnExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer


Date: April 5, 2007
H. Res. 472 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 9, 2009. 

Whereas the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) 

was formed 70 years ago, in May 1939, on the eve of 

World War II; 

Whereas the AOPA is committed to improving general aviation safety; 

Whereas the AOPA created the AOPA Air Safety Foundation, the only organization dedicated solely to that end, 

nearly 60 years ago; 

Whereas the AOPA represents more than 415,000 members, 

or 7 out of every 10 pilots in the United States; 

Whereas the AOPA has, for 7 decades, provided those pilots 

with education, information, and advocacy at all levels of 

government; 

Whereas the AOPA was among the earliest proponents of civilian use of the Global Positioning Satellite System, setting the stage for development of the Next Generation 

Air Transportation System; 

Whereas the AOPA was a leading advocate of the General 

Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994, which led to the recovery of the United States general aviation light aircraft 

manufacturing industry, a major United States export 

and a plus on the trade balance sheet; 
2 

•HRES 472 EH 

Whereas the AOPA has developed and maintained close 

working relationships with agencies of the Federal Government, especially the Department of Transportation, 

the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Transportation Security Administration; and 

Whereas those relationships have allowed the public and private sectors to address various issues of legitimate concern to the Federal government in ways that impose the 

least possible burden on general aviation pilots and aircraft owners: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates and salutes the Aircraft Owners 

and Pilots Association (AOPA) for celebrating its 70th 

anniversary; 

(2) commends the AOPA for creating the AOPA 

Air Safety Foundation nearly 60 years ago to improve 

general aviation safety; 

(3) commends the AOPA for helping lead the recovery of the United States general aviation light aircraft 

manufacturing industry; and 
3 

•HRES 472 EH 

(4) commends the AOPA for setting the stage for 

development of the Next Generation Air Transportation 

System. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Christopher Montoya, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

State of Arizona, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-08025-PCT-DGC (ESW)

ORDER 

 Plaintiff Christopher Montoya, who is confined in the Arizona State PrisonKingman (ASP-Kingman) in Kingman, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights First Amended 

Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 9). The Court ordered Defendant Herrick 

to answer Court Three of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 10 at 10). 

 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 

15). Plaintiff requests that the Court appoint him counsel because (i) Plaintiff is indigent, 

(ii) the medical issues in his case will require medical experts and dissemination of 

Plaintiff’s confidential medical records to a medical expert, and (iii) Plaintiff will need to 

be questioned by counsel during his trial. 

There is no constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in a civil case. See 

Johnson v. U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, 939 F.2d 820, 824 (9th Cir. 1991); Ivey v. Bd of 

Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th Cir. 1982). In pro se and in forma 

pauperis proceedings, district courts do not have the authority “to make coercive 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

appointments of counsel.” Mallard v. United States District Court, 490 U.S. 296, 310 

(1989). District courts, however, do have the discretion to request that an attorney 

represent an indigent civil litigant upon a showing of “exceptional circumstances.” 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Agyeman v. Corrections Corp. Of America, 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 

(9th Cir. 2004); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991). A determination 

with respect to exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of the likelihood of 

success on the merits as well as the ability of Plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in 

light of the complexity of the legal issue involved. Id. “Neither of these factors is 

dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision.” Id. (quoting 

Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)). 

 Plaintiff’s filings with the Court indicate that Plaintiff is capable of navigating this 

proceeding and presenting arguments to the Court. Having considered the likelihood of 

success on the merits and Plaintiff’s ability to articulate his claims, the Court does not 

find that exceptional circumstances are present that would require the appointment of 

counsel in this case. Plaintiff remains in a position no different than many pro se prisoner 

litigants. The Court will deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 15). 

CONCLUSION 

For the reasons set forth herein, 

IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 

15). 

 Dated this 19th day of October, 2018. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jin Hu, the Chief Financial Officer of China TMK Battery Systems Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 24th day of May, 2010.

/s/ Jin HuJin Hu 
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and will be retained by China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Sangui Biotech International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Striepe, Chief Executive Officer and, I, Joachim Fleing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Thomas Striepe By: Thomas Striepe Chief Executive Officer  Dated: August 22, 2011     /s/ Joachim Fleing, Ph.D By: Joachim Fleing, Ph.D Chief Financial Officer  Dated: August 22, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.