Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 22, 1996 / Notices 25669

TABLE 2. — REGISTRANTS REQUESTING VOLUNTARY CANCELLATION—Continued

EPA

Company No.Company Name and Address

049320 Progressive Agri-Systems, Inc., 125 W. Seventh Street, Wind Gap, PA 18091.

055615 Wilbro, Inc., Corner 3rd & Lexington, Norway, SC 29113.

055638 Ecogen Inc., 2005 Cabot Blvd W., Langhorne, PA 19047.

059639 Valent U.S.A. Corp., 1333 N. California Blvd, Ste 600, Walnut Creek, CA 94596.

062719 DowElanco, 9330 Zionsville Rd., 308/3e, Indianapolis, IN 46268.

066676 Nortech Forest Products Inc., 7600 W. 27th St., Suite B11, St Louis Park, MN 55426.

069421 Black Flag Insect Control Systems, c/o PS & RC, Box 493, Pleasanton, CA 94566.

III. Loss of Active Ingredients

Unless the requests for cancellation are withdrawn, three pesticide active ingredients will no longer appear in any

registered products. Those who are concerned about the potential loss of these active ingredients for pesticidal use

are encouraged to work directly with the registrant to explore the possibility of their withdrawing the request for

cancellation. The active ingredients are listed in the following Table 3, with the EPA Company and CAS Number.

TABLE 3. — ACTIVE INGREDIENTS WHICH WOULD DISAPPEAR AS A RESULT OF REGISTRANTS’ REQUESTS TO CANCEL

CAS No. Chemical Name EPA Company No.

94–80–4 Butyl 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate stems of 019713

53404–31–2 Butoxyethyl 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propionate 000264

15662–33–6 Ryanodine 049320

IV. Procedures for Withdrawal of

Request

Registrants who choose to withdraw a

request for cancellation must submit

such withdrawal in writing to James A.

Hollins, at the address given above,

postmarked before August 20, 1996.

This written withdrawal of the request

for cancellation will apply only to the

applicable 6(f)(1) request listed in this

notice. If the product(s) have been

subject to a previous cancellation

action, the effective date of cancellation

and all other provisions of any earlier

cancellation action are controlling. The

withdrawal request must also include a

commitment to pay any reregistration

fees due, and to fulfill any applicable

unsatisfied data requirements.

V. Provisions for Disposition of Existing

Stocks

The effective date of cancellation will

be the date of the cancellation order.

The orders effecting these requested

cancellations will generally permit a

registrant to sell or distribute existing

stocks for 1 year after the date the

cancellation request was received. This

policy is in accordance with the

Agency’s statement of policy as

prescribed in Federal Register No. 123,

Vol. 56, dated June 26, 1991. Exceptions

to this general rule will be made if a

product poses a risk concern, or is in

noncompliance with reregistration

requirements, or is subject to a data callin. In all cases, product-specific

disposition dates will be given in the

cancellation orders.

Existing stocks are those stocks of

registered pesticide products which are

currently in the United States and

which have been packaged, labeled, and

released for shipment prior to the

effective date of the cancellation action.

Unless the provisions of an earlier order

apply, existing stocks already in the

hands of dealers or users can be

distributed, sold or used legally until

they are exhausted, provided that such

further sale and use comply with the

EPA-approved label and labeling of the

affected product(s). Exceptions to these

general rules will be made in specific

cases when more stringent restrictions

on sale, distribution, or use of the

products or their ingredients have

already been imposed, as in Special

Review actions, or where the Agency

has identified significant potential risk

concerns associated with a particular

chemical.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Pesticide

and pests, Product registrations.

Dated: May 3, 1996.

Frank Sanders,

Director, Program Management and Support

Division.

[FR Doc. 96–12603 Filed 5–21–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

[FRL–5509–3]

Integrated Report of the Urban Soil

Lead Abatement Demonstration

Project

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

availability of a final report titled,

Integrated Report of the Urban Soil Lead

Abatement Demonstration Project (EPA/

600/P–93/001 aF), as well as the

pertinent underlying data sets and

documentation. This Report is an

integrated assessment of scientific data

from the separate Boston, Baltimore and

Cincinnati studies.

ADDRESSES: To obtain a single copy of

the Integrated Report, interested parties

should contact the ORD Publications

Office, Technology Transfer Division,

National Risk Management Research

Laboratory, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther

King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268;

telephone: 513–569–7562; facsimile:
25670 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 22, 1996 / Notices

513–569–7566. Copies of the Integrated

Report will be available on or about May

30, 1996. Please provide your name and

mailing address, and request the

document by the title and EPA number

(EPA/600/P–93/001aF). Also, a limited

number of the 1993 individual reports

on the separate city studies are still

available. The EPA document numbers

for the separate three city reports are:

Boston (EPA/600/AP–93/001b)

Baltimore (EPA/600/AP–93/001c) and

Cincinnati (EPA/600/AP–93/001d).

There will be a limited number of paper

copies of the Integrated Report available

from the above source. Requests will be

filed on a first-come-first-served basis.

After the supply is exhausted, copies of

the Integrated Report and any of the

individual final reports on the separate

city studies can be purchased separately

or as a set, from the National Technical

Information Service (NTIS) by calling

(703) 487–4650 or sending a facsimile to

(703) 321–8547. The NTIS order

numbers are: Urban Soil Lead

Abatement Demonstration Project.

Volume 1: Integrated Report (PB96–

168356), Urban Soil Lead Abatement

Demonstration Project. Volume 2:

Boston Report (PB96–168364), Urban

Soil Lead Abatement Demonstration

Project. Volume 3: Baltimore Report

(PB96–168372), and Urban Soil Lead

Abatement Demonstration Project.

Volume 4: Cincinnati Report (PB96–

168380). The NTIS ordered number for

the four volume set is PB96–168349.

An official copy, on diskette only, of

the underlying data sets used in the EPA

Integrated Report and a copy of the

accompanying documentation, can be

obtained by contacting: Dr. Robert W.

Elias, National Center for Environmental

Assessment (MD–52), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;

telephone: (929) 541–4167; facsimile:

(919) 541–5078. e-mail:

elias.robert@epamail.epa.gov

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Robert W. Elias, National Center for

Environmental Assessment (MD–52),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;

telephone: (919) 541–4167; facsimile:

(919) 541–5078. e-mail:

elias.robert.@epamail.epa.gov: or Larry

J. Zaragoza, Office of Solid Waste and

Emergency Response (5204G), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460;

telephone; (703) 603–8867, facsimile:

(703) 603–9100, e-mail:

zaragoza.larry@epamail.epa.gov

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Urban

Soil Lead Abatement Demonstration

Project, generally known as the ThreeCity Lead Study, was authorized in 1986

under Section 111(b)(6) of the

Superfund Amendments and

Reauthorization Act [42 U.S.C.

§ 9611(a)(6)] and was initiated in

December 1986 in cooperation with

states, state health departments, and

local scientists. The purpose was to

determine whether abatement of lead in

soil could reduce the lead in blood of

inner city children. The three selected

cities, chosen in late 1987, were Boston,

Baltimore, and Cincinnati. The

individual results for each of the three

cities were initially presented at an

EPA-sponsored symposium in August

1992 and published as final reports in

August 1993.

While not part of the original project

plan, EPA believed that all interested

parties would benefit from an integrated

assessment of data from the three

coordinated studies. Thus, as an adjunct

to the original project, this Integrated

Report was developed. It includes

further statistical analysis and integrates

and standardizes, as appropriate, the

results of the individual three cities

studies into a single report.

The final EPA Integrated Report on

the Three-City Lead Study basically

confirms the findings of the individual

city reports. The Integrated Report

concludes that:

(1) When soil is a significant source

of lead in the child’s environment, the

abatement of that soil will result in a

reduction in exposure that will, under

certain conditions, cause a reduction in

childhood blood lead concentrations.

(2) Although these conditions for a

reduction in blood are not fully

understood, it is likely that four factors

are important: (1) The past history of

exposure of the child to lead, as

reflected in the preabatement blood

lead; (2) the magnitude of the reduction

in soil lead concentrations; (3) the

magnitude of the other sources of lead

exposure, relative to soil; and (4) a

direct exposure pathway between soil

and the child.

Dated: May 16, 1996.

Joseph K. Alexander,

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Research

and Development.

[FR Doc. 96–12865 Filed 5–21–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Submission for OMB

Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the

Commission announces that on May 15,

1996 it submitted the existing collection

of information listed below to the Office

of Management and Budget for

approval. No public comments were

received in response to the

Commission’s March 15, 1996 initial

notice of the proposed collection.

DATES: Written comments on this notice

must be submitted on or before June 21,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

submitted to Desk Officer for Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Management and Budget, New

Executive Office Building, 725

Seventeenth Street, N.W., Room 10235,

Washington, D.C. 20503, (202) 395–

7316, Facsimile (202) 395–6974.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margaret, Ulmer Holmes, Office of

Management, Room 2204, 1801 L Street

N.W., Washington, D.C. 20507, (202)

663–4279 (voice) or (202) 663–7114

(TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Collection Title: Recordkeeping

Requirements of Uniform Guidelines on

Employee Selection Procedures, 29

C.F.R. Part 1607.

Form Number: None.

Frequency of Report: None required.

Type of Respondent: Business, nonfor-profit institutions, federal, state, or

local governments, and farms.

Standard Industrial Classification

(SIC) Code: Multiple.

Description of Affected Public: Any

employer, labor, organization, or

employment agency covered by the

federal equal employment opportunity

laws.

Responses: 666,000.

Reporting Hours: 1,450,000.

Number of Forms: None.

Abstract: The records required to be

maintained by 29 C.F.R. 1607.4 and

1607.15 are used by respondents to

assure that they are complying with

Title VII; by the Commission in

investigating, conciliating, the litigating

charges of employment discrimination;

and by complainants in establishing

violations of federal equal employment

opportunity laws.

Burden Statement: There are no

reporting requirements associated with

UGESP. Thus the only paperwork

burden derives from the required

recordkeeping. There are a total of

666.000 employers who have 15 or more

employees and that are, therefore,

subject to the recordkeeping

requirement. Prior to the imposition of