alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32** **.1**









**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









**EXHIBIT
        32**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
  **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
  **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**
  **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
    In
        connection with the Quarterly Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd, on Form 10-QSB for
        the
        quarter ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), the undersigned, Louis Vucci,
        Jr.,
        President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
        pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
        my
        knowledge and belief:
  1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
  (a)
        or 15
        (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
                  February 9, 2007
                
                By:
                  /s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.
                -------------------------------------------------------------------
                Louis
                  Vucci, Jr., President and
                  Director
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2453-2454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1422]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-43; RM-8580]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Grand Junction, CO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 264C1 to Grand Junction, 
Colorado, as that community's fifth local FM transmission service, in 
response to a petition for rule making filed on behalf of Grand Valley 
Public Radio Company, Inc. See 60 FR 19560, April 19, 1995. Coordinates 
used for Channel 264C1 at Grand Junction are 30-04-06 and 108-33-00. 
With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective March 4, 1996. The window period for filing 
applications will open on March 4, 1996, and close on March 19, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180. Questions related to the window application filing process 
for Channel 264C1 at Grand Junction, Colorado, should be addressed to 
the Audio Services Division, FM Branch, (202) 418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 95-43, adopted December 11, 1995, and 
released January 19, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, located at 1919 M Street, NW., Room 246, or 2100 
M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:


[[Page 2454]]

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Colorado is 
amended by adding Channel 264C1 at Grand Junction.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-1422 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Signet International Holdings, Inc.
File No. 000-51185

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       as adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ernest W.
Letiziano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: January 31, 2007                  By:/s/ Ernest W. Letiziano
                                               Ernest W. Letiziano
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet
International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
#### STEELPANEL DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AMHERST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 68174.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

March 26, 1996.

Lander & Berkowitz, P.C., Ira M. Berkow-itz, Cynthia Forsythe Tolan, St. Louis, for appellant.

Borgmann, Hanlon, Schwartz & Wilson, L.L.C., Edward J. Hanlon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., and FLANIGAN and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action on open account for building materials sold. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case 2:17-cr-01454-GMS Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01454-GMS Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01454-GMS Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01454-GMS Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Eugene G. Banucci, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ATMI, Inc. (the“Company”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Companyand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation;  c) disclosed in this annual report any change in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of theCompany’s board of directors:
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theCompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 12, 2004                                                  /s/ Eugene G. Banucci   Eugene G. Banucci, Ph.D.
Case 2:17-cr-01426-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01426-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01426-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01426-SPL Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Paul J. Kane, certify that: 

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

 

 (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 30, 2008

 

/s/ Paul J. Kane______________________

 

Paul J. Kane

Chief Financial Officer

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I JosephDriscoll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Sec. 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.              The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.              The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Joseph Driscoll     |   |                |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------|
| Joseph Driscoll         |   | August 8, 2008 |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |                |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25883-25884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12961]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Care Financing Administration
[HCFA 301]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposals for the collection of information. Interested persons are 
invited to send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, including any of the 
following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed 
information collection for the proper performance of the agency's 
functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology to minimize the information collection 
burden.
    1. Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection; 
Title of Information Collection: Certification of Medicaid Eligibility 
Quality Control (MEQC) Payment Error Rates; Form No.: HCFA-301; Use: 
This certification is the new form by which States will report their 
MEQC payment error rate findings. This form represents aggregate data 
which were formerly collected through the Integrated Review Schedule; 
Frequency: Semi-annually; Affected Public: State, local, or tribal 
government; Number of Respondents:

[[Page 25884]]

51; Total Annual Responses: 102; Total Annual Hours: 22,515.
    To request copies of the proposed paperwork collection referenced 
above, E-mail your request, including your address, to 
P<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7a6b7a2b5b0a8b5ac87afa4a1a6e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98f9e8fdeaeff7eaf3d8f0fbfef9b6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-
1326. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collections should be sent within 60 days of this notice directly to 
the HCFA Paperwork Clearance Officer designated at the following 
address: HCFA, Office of Financial and Human Resources, Management 
Planning and Analysis Staff, Attention: Linda Mansfield, Room C2-26-17, 
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Kathleen B. Larson,
Director, Management Planning and Analysis Staff, Office of Financial 
and Human Resources, Health Care Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-12961 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Ocean West Holding Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies with respect to
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
year ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the 10-K Report) that
to his knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|
| | 2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                                                                                
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ MARSHALL L. STEWARTMarshall L. StewartPresident and Chief Executive Officer                
|                      
|Date: January 13, 2004 |  |                                                                                                
|                      
|                       |  | /s/ DARYL S. MEDDINGSDaryl S. MeddingsExecutive Vice President and
     Chief Financial Officer
|                      
|Date: January 13, 2004 |  |
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 565 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2009 

Received 

RESOLUTION 

Appointing and authorizing managers for the impeachment 

of Samuel B. Kent, a judge of the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Texas. 

1 Resolved, That Mr. Schiff, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of Cali2 fornia, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Goodlatte, and Mr. 

3 Sensenbrenner are appointed managers on the part of the 

4 House to conduct the trial of the impeachment of Samuel 

5 B. Kent, a judge of the United States District Court for 

6 the Southern District of Texas, that a message be sent 

7 to the Senate to inform the Senate of these appointments, 

8 and that the managers on the part of the House may ex9 hibit the articles of impeachment to the Senate and take 

10 all other actions necessary in connection with preparation 

11 for, and conduct of, the trial, which may include the fol12 lowing: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 565 RDS 

1 (1) Employing legal, clerical, and other nec2 essary assistants and incurring such other expenses 

3 as may be necessary, to be paid from amounts avail4 able to the Committee on the Judiciary under House 

5 Resolution 279, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, 

6 agreed to March 31, 2009, or any other applicable 

7 expense resolution on vouchers approved by the 

8 Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary. 

9 (2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing 

10 with the Secretary of the Senate, on the part of the 

11 House of Representatives, any subsequent pleadings 

12 which they consider necessary. 

Attest: NANCY PELOSI, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Darryl D Johnson,

Petitioner,

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al.,

Respondents.

No. CV-17-04473-PHX-GMS (ESW)

ORDER 

Petitioner Darryl D. Johnson, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison

Complex-Yuma, filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 (Doc. 1). The Court ordered Respondents to file an answer (Doc. 5 at 3).

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Request the Appointment of 

Counsel (Doc. 8) and Respondents’ Response (Doc. 10). Petitioner requests that the 

Court appoint counsel for Petitioner because (i) Petitioner cannot afford to hire counsel, 

(ii) Petitioner has a meritorious claim but is not legally trained, (iii) Petitioner has no 

ability to conduct discovery or investigate the facts of his case, (iv) Petitioner’s helper 

was transferred to another facility, and (v) Petitioner has no practical ability to find an 

attorney.

“Indigent state prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to

appointed counsel unless the circumstances of a particular case indicate that appointed

counsel is necessary to prevent due process violations.” Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1191,1196 (9th Cir. 1986). However, the Court has discretion to appoint counsel when 

“the interests of justice so require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). “In deciding whether to 

appoint counsel in a habeas proceeding, the district court must evaluate the likelihood of 

success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se 

in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 

954 (9th Cir. 1983) (per curiam) (citations omitted). “Neither of these considerations is 

dispositive and instead must be viewed together.” Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 

(9th Cir. 2009). 

Having considered both elements, Petitioner has not shown that the interests of

justice require the appointment of counsel in this case. Petitioner has not demonstrated a

likelihood of success on the merits, nor has he shown that he is experiencing difficulty in 

litigating this case because of the complexity of the issues involved. Petitioner’s filings 

with the Court, as well as the instant motion, indicate that Petitioner remains capable of 

navigating his proceedings and presenting arguments to the Court. Petitioner is in a

position no different than many pro se prisoner litigants. Should the Court determine that 

an evidentiary hearing in this matter is required or counsel is necessary for the effective 

utilization of discovery procedures, counsel may be appointed. See Rules 6(a) and 8(c), 

28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED denying Petitioner’s Motion to Request the Appointment of 

Counsel (Doc. 8). 

Dated this 12th day of February, 2018.