alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern 1 District of Iowa, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Celeste F. Bremer, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2480

___________ Kenneth W. Simpson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Cathy Brandon, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 24, 1998 Filed: December 1, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. KennethW. Simpson appeals from the district court & s dismissal of his actio n 1 with prejudice u nder Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with court orders. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & submi ssions, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. Se e Rodgers v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo. , 135 F.3d 1216, 1219 (8th Cir. 1998)-2-

(standardof review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT**

**OF**

**CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2004**

 

# **1.**               The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Crown Media Holdings,Inc. (“Crown Media Holdings”).  ThisCertification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002.  This Certification accompanies the10-K Report of Crown Media Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2004.

# ** **

# **2.**               I certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Crown Media Holdings.

 

 

This Certification is executed as of May 23, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ DAVID J. EVANS            |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | David J. Evans, President and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31059 Summary Calendar

WELTON BROWN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

CARL CASTERLINE, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2481

- - - - - - - - - - April 21, 1998
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Welton Brown, federal prisoner #21317-034, appeals the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 application. Brown

seeks credit against his federal sentence for the five years he

served at the Louisiana State Penitentiary on state robbery charges

arising out of the same events as his federal bank robbery

conviction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for

the reasons given by the district court. B rown v. Warden
, No. 96-

2481 (W.D. La. Aug. 15, 1997). Brown is warned that any furtherNo. 97-31059 -2-

challenges to his sentence will result in the imposition of

sanctions.
#### STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Penny D. ALBERD, Appellant.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville.

June 28, 1995.

Shipp R. Weems, District Public Defender, Carey J. Thompson, Assistant Public Defender, Charlotte, for the Appellant.

Charles W. Burson, Attorney General & Reporter, Ellen H. Pollack, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Justice Division, Nashville, Dan M. Alsobrooks, District Attorney General, Suzanne Lockert, Asst. Dist. Attorney General, Charlotte, for the Appel-lee.

OPINION

SUMMERS, Judge.

The appellant, Penny D. Alberd, presents an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 9' of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. The only issue for our review is whether the trial court erred in finding that the district attorney general in this case did not abuse his discretion. We respectfully find reversible error.

The appellant was charged with possession of marijuana with the intent to sell. Following her arraignment, the appellant applied to the district attorney general’s office for consideration for pre-trial diversion. Although the assistant district attorney general assigned to the case agreed that the appellant qualified for pre-trial diversion, she declined to enter into a memorandum of understanding unless the appellant would agree to pay a mandatory minimum fine of $2,000 as contemplated by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 39-17-428(b)(7) (1994). The appellant submits, and the state concedes, that the mandatory minimum fine provisions of the statute are triggered only by a conviction. *See*T.C.A. § 39-17-428 (1994).

The statute in question provides, in pertinent part, “[A]ny person convicted of violating any provision of this part shall be fined no less than the amount set out in the schedule.” *Id.*The plain language of the statute indicates that the mandatory minimum fine is to be imposed following a conviction. Furthermore, while the statute which provides for a memorandum of understanding and suspended prosecution authorizes the payment of court costs, restitution, and part of the expense of supervising the defendant, the statute does not contemplate the imposition of fines. T.C.A. § 40-15-105 (1994).

The judgment of the trial court is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of pre-trial diversion without the imposition of a mandatory minimum fine prior to the entry of a memorandum of understanding.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TIPTON and BARKER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.1



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, DC 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2019 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Mr. Sandeep Bakhshi, Managing Director & CEO, Mr. Sandeep
Batra, Executive Director (Designate) and Mr. Rakesh Jha, Group Chief Financial Officer of ICICI Bank Limited, each certifies that,
to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of ICICI Bank Limited.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 31, 2019



|By: | /s/ Sandeep Bakhshi |                        
|--- | ------------------- | -----------------------
|    | Name:               | Sandeep Bakhshi        
|    | Title:              | Managing Director & CEO



|
|







|By: | /s/ Sandeep Batra |                               
|--- | ----------------- | ------------------------------
|    | Name:             | Sandeep Batra                 
|    | Title:            | Executive Director (Designate)



|
|





|By: | /s/ Rakesh Jha |                              
|--- | -------------- | -----------------------------
|    | Name:          | Rakesh Jha                   
|    | Title:         | Group Chief Financial Officer

|
|







Exhibit 13.1 - 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14447]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 169, Aeronautical Data Link 
Applications

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special 
Committee 169 meeting to be held June 25-26, 1996, starting at 9:00 
a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Plenary Administration: Chairman's 
Introductory Remarks; Review and Approval of Meeting Agenda; Review and 
Approval of Minutes from the Previous Meeting; Review of Outstanding 
Action Items; (2) Working Group (WG) Progress: WG-1, Air/Ground Air 
Traffic Service Applications; WG-2, Systems Architecture/Performance; 
WG-3, Flight Information Services Applications; WG-4, International 
Coordination: WG-5, Ground/Ground Traffic Flow Management Applications; 
WG-6, Human Factors Guidelines; (3) Presentations (None Planned); (4) 
Document Approvals: DO-219/Change 1; Human Factors Guidelines; (5) 
Other Business; (6) Plenary Administration Wrap-Up: Work Plan 
Modifications; Data and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 3, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-14447 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
EXHIBIT 32.3



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH I FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of UCFH I Finance, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 15, 2005



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)
#### TOWER ROCK STONE COMPANY, Appellant, v. LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATION COMMISSION, et al., Respondents.

No. 56705.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 13, 1990.

Mark W. Weisman, St. Louis, Robert J. Selsor, Clayton, for appellant.

Victorine Robben Mahon, Sandy Bowers, Jefferson City, for respondents.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tower Rock Stone Company, appeals the February 23,1989, judgment of the circuit court affirming a decision of the Industrial Relations Commission finding two former Tower Rock Stone Company *842employees to be entitled to unemployment compensation. We affirm. There is competent and substantial evidence in the record to support the circuit court’s decision and there would be no precedential purpose served by a full opinion. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.86

                            FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
               AFC ENTERPRISES, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the AFC Enterprises, Inc.  Deferred Compensation
Plan (the "Plan") is made as of the ___ day of ___________, 1998, by AFC
Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company".)


                             W I T N E S S E T H :

     WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of the Company's
key management and highly compensated employees and the key management and
highly compensated employees of its affiliates; and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Company has the right to
amend the Plan at any time; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to make certain changes to the Plan as
embodied herein;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan hereby is amended as follows:

     1.   The text of Section 1.2 in Article I is hereby amended by deleting
said text in its entirety and by substituting in lieu thereof the following:

          1.2  ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE shall mean the committee approved by the
               ------------------------                                         
          Board to administer the Plan, as provided in Article VIII; provided if
          for any period of time the Board has not specifically appointed any
          individuals to serve as members of the Administrative Committee under
          the Plan, the members of the Administrative Committee of the AFC
          Enterprises, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan shall serve as the
          Administrative Committee of the Plan during such period.

     2.   The changes made in Paragraph 1 shall be effective as of January 1,
          1998.

     3.   Except as otherwise specified herein, the Plan shall remain in full
          force and effect.

                                      -1-
<PAGE>
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to
execute this First Amendment on the date first above written.

                                           AFC ENTERPRISES, INC.

                                           By: _________________________________

                                           Title:_______________________________

                                      -2-
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28572-28573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14023]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-63-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Refund 
Report

May 30, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) a refund report in accordance with 
Section 4 of Transco's Rate Schedule

[[Page 28573]]

LSS and Section 3 of Transco's Rate Schedule GSS.
    Transco states that on May 13, 1996, it refunded $290,545.53 to its 
LSS and GSS customers. The refund was due Transco's customers from a 
CNG Transmission Corporation refund in Docket Nos. RP94-96 and RP94-213 
(consolidated) for the period July 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before June 6, 1996. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14023 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.1(1)

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Joshua Pickus, the Chief Executive Officer
of SupportSoft, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JOSHUA PICKUSJoshua PickusChief Executive Officer and President


Date: April 24, 2009





A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been
provided to SupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically
incorporates it by reference.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1
                            Certification Pursuant to
        Section 1350 of chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an officer
of I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc. ("Isaacs"), that, to his knowledge, the Annual
Report of Isaacs on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
Isaacs.


Dated:  March 29,  2004

                                      /s/ Peter J. Rizzo
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Peter J. Rizzo,  Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Robert J. Conologue
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Robert J. Conologue, COO and CFO
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Xianping Wang, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Xinhua China LTD., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xinhua China LTD. for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Xinhua China LTD.





Date: October 12, 2010
By:
/s/   "Xianping Wang"Name: Xianping WangTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer






By:
/s/   "Xianping Wang"Name: Xianping WangTitle: Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Xinhua China LTD. and will be retained by Xinhua China LTD. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Robert RODGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48379.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 29, 1994.

Lorry L. Kohrs, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, C.J., P.J., and KENNEDY and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Judgment Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeremy Thacker, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GPS Insight LLC, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-18-00063-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Notice of Discovery Dispute 

(Doc. 55). On the Court's own motion, 

 IT IS ORDERED setting a Telephonic Discovery Dispute Hearing for July 26, 

2018 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel will receive dial-in instructions for the teleconference 

separately via electronic mail prior to the hearing. 

Dated this 16th day of July, 2018. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF  VYYO INC.

In connection with the Annual Report of Vyyo Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Wayne H. Davis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert K. Mills, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|/s/WAYNE H. DAVISWayne H. Davis Chief Executive
OfficerJune 30, 2008   |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ROBERT K. MILLSRobert K. Mills Chief Financial OfficerJune 30, 2008 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Monique Portillo, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Philip Brailsford, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00178-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 On November 2, 2018 this Court issued its Order ordering that Defendant Charles 

Langley’s answer was due 60 days from November 1, 2018. After review of the docket the 

Court notes that no answer has been filed and no application for entry of default has been 

made. 

 IT IS ORDERED that counsel for the Plaintiff file a status report within 7 days of 

the date of this Order. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter will be dismissed as to Defendant 

Charles Langley without further notice 7 days from the date of this Order if counsel fails 

to file a status report. 

 Dated this 14th day of January, 2019. 

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 52 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 1