alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 10, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-840 Lower Tribunal No. 19-3374

________________ 

### Ulises Perez , Appellant,
vs. 

### C. H. Robinson Company, and APM & Associates, Inc., etc. , Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Judge. Rubenstein Law, P.A., and Gregory Deutch; Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Adam Richardson (West Palm Beach), for appellant. Fowler White Burnett, P.A., and Richard Morris and J. Michael Pennekamp, for appellee C. H. Robinson Company; Cole, Scott & Kissane, P. A., and Lissette Gonzalez, for appellee APM & Associates, Inc. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Leo's Gulf Liquors v. Lakhani, 802 So. 2d 337, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“We conclude that the trial judge's thoughtful and complete analysis of the facts presented in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss for fraud upon the court is amply supported by the record and does not constitute an abuse of discretion.”); Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Martinsen, 736 So. 2d 794, 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“[A] party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve her ends.” (quoting Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So. 2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998))).
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Robert L. Edwards, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Intentionally omitted].

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                           |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Robert L. Edwards                      |  |  |  |                        
|Robert L. Edwards, Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | Date: November 20, 2006
Certificate of Amendment dated February 3, 2006


EX-3.4


Exhibit 3(i).4    State of Delaware Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Online Innovation, Inc.  ONLINE INNOVATION, INC., a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,  Does Hereby Certify:  First:  Acting by unanimous written consent in accordance with the provisions of Section 141(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors of ONLINE INNOVATION, INC., duly adopted resolutions setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable.  The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:  RESOLVED, that Article FIRST of this corporations Certificate of Incorporation be amended and replaced in its entirety to specify:  FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Moventis Capital, Inc.  SECOND:  That said amendment was duly approved and adopted by written consent by the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of this corporations $0.001 par value common stock in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said ONLINE INNOVATION, INC, has caused this certificate to be signed by Chad Lee, an Authorized Officer, this 3rd day of February, 2006.  BY:  /s/Chad Lee ----------------------------------- Chad D. Lee, President  - 1 -
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5671 

To require the Secretary of State to determine whether United States national 

Vladimir Kara-Murza is being detained wrongfully abroad for purposes 

of the Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. COHEN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to determine whether 

United States national Vladimir Kara-Murza is being 

detained wrongfully abroad for purposes of the Robert 

Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5671 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT OF SECRETARY OF STATE TO 

2 DETERMINE WHETHER UNITED STATES NA3 TIONAL VLADIMIR KARA-MURZA IS BEING 

4 WRONGFULLY DETAINED ABROAD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State 

7 shall make a determination of whether or not United 

8 States national Vladimir Kara-Murza is being detained 

9 wrongfully by the Russian Federation for purposes of the 

10 Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking 

11 Accountability Act (22 U.S.C. 1741 et seq.). 

12 (b) REPORT.—If the Secretary of State makes a de13 termination under subsection (a) that Vladimir Kara14 Murza is not being detained wrongfully by the Russian 

15 Federation, the Secretary shall, not later than 180 days 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 180 

17 days thereafter, submit to Congress a report that con18 tains— 

19 (1) a justification for the determination; and 

20 (2) a description of the actions the Department 

21 of State is taking to secure the release of Vladimir 

22 Kara-Murza. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11664]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Air Force Academy Board of Visitors; Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 9355, Title 10 United States Code, the Air 
Force Academy Board of Visitors will meet at the U.S. Air Force 
Academy, Colorado, 12-14 July 1996. The purpose of the meeting is to 
consider morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical 
equipment, fiscal affairs, academic methods, and other matters relating 
to the Academy.
    A portion of the meeting will be open to the public on the morning 
of 13 July 1996. Other portions of the meeting will be closed to the 
public to discuss matters listed in the subsections (2), (4), and (6) 
of section 552b(c), Title 5, United States Code. These closed sessions 
will included attendance at cadet training programs and discussions 
with cadets, military staff, and faculty officers involving personal 
information and opinion, the disclosure of which would result in a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Closed sessions will 
also include executive sessions involving discussions of personal 
information, including financial information, and information relating 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of the Board of 
Visitors and the Academy. Meeting sessions will be held to various 
facilities throughout the cadet area.
    For further information contact my Project Officers, Capt Timothy 
D. Miller or Ms. Deborah Mercurio, 2304 Cadet Drive, Suite 350, USAF 
Academy CO 80840-5002, DSN 259-3450 or 719-472-3450.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11664 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Scott Daniel Warren,

Defendant. _________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. M 18-01455-N/A(BPV)

ORDER

There being no objection,

IT IS ORDERED that the Government’s Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to

Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 be granted concerning disclosure related to data from material witness

Kristian Perez-Vaillanueva’s cell phone described as compact discs containing cellular

telephone data.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel, including investigators,

paralegals, and office staff, receiving the compact disc containing the aforementioned data

shall not provide, reproduce, or distribute in hard copy or electronic form any personal

information contained within that data without further Order of the Court. The Defendant

shall not provide, reproduce, or distribute in hard copy or electronic form any personal

information contained on the compact disc. This Order shall not prevent defense counsel

from otherwise showing or discussing with the Defendant evidence contained within that

discovery under the supervision of defense counsel or his agents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel may provide the discovery

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 20 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

contained on the compact disc for the use of his investigator (who consents to the jurisdiction

and Order of this Court), but that such investigator shall not further copy said discovery

without further Order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel may provide the discovery

contained on the compact disc for the use of his paralegal (who consents to the jurisdiction

and Order of this Court), but that such paralegal shall not further copy said discovery without

further Order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel may provide the discovery for

the use of any expert (who consents to the jurisdiction and Order of this Court), but that such

expert shall not further copy said discovery without further Order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to the discovery contained on the

compact disc, this discovery is for the use in the defense of this criminal case only and that

the compact disc shall be returned to the Government so that the extracted data contained can

be destroyed after the completion of the proceedings.

DATED this 26th day of January, 2018.

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 20 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

RESIGNATION OF CHARLES 

HILSABECK, BAR NO. 4289. 

No. 84536 

FILE 

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATION 

This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney 

Charles Hilsabeck for his resignation from the Nevada bar. 

SCR 98(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively 

practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain 

conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff 

confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security 

fund matters are pending against Hilsabeck; and that he is current on all 

membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to his 

practice of law in this state. See SCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2). 

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be 

approved, and the Board of Governors • has approved the application for 

resignation. See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Hilsabeck acknowledges that his 

resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing 

jurisdiction with respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior 

to resignation. See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Hilsabeck has submitted an 

affidavit of compliance with SCR 115. See SCR 98(5)(e). 

lz• 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 4410. 
The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). 

Accordingly, we approve attorney Charles Hilsabeck's resignation. SCR 

98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Bar Counse, State Bar of Nevada 

Charles Hilsabeck 

Executive Director 

Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

Ne/ADA 

(0) I 947A 

2
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00338

- CV

Travis CROW, Britt A. Crow, Laurian Crow Edison, and Karen A. Kraft

, Appellant s

v.

Heddie Knappick LOOKADOO, Lisa Knappick Lucas, Mary Brown, Margaret Brown Nugent

, Charles Brown, Joseph Gallagher, Josephine Brown Noll, Pamela Gallagher Palmer, and Irene B. Zoeller, Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 10

- 00188

- CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Ap pellees’ ( Brown Heirs ) motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order the brief due December 13, 2017.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Narachi President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2010



/s/ Michael A. NarachiMichael A. NarachiPresident and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-77060-99, 333-35323, 333-49561, 333-55827, 333-56349,
333-46222 and 333-107591) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-82089, 333-94641, 333-31982, 333-46224 and 333-76378) of ATMI, Inc. of our
reports dated March 7, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of ATMI, Inc., ATMI, Inc. management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ATMI, Inc.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 7, 2006
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael T. WALLER, Appellant.

No. WD 41469.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 20, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 24, 1990.

*823David S. Durbin, Appellate Defender, Terri L. Backhus, Asst. Appellate Defender, Office of the State Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from a conviction of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, RSMo 1986, and from a sentence as a prior and persistent offender of ten years imprisonment.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1352]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-01; OTS No. 6037]


Patapsco Federal Savings and Loan Association, Dundalk, MD; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on January 19, 1996, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Patapsco Federal Savings and Loan Association, Dundalk, Maryland, to 
convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and 
the Southeast Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1475 
Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309.

    Dated: January 23, 1996.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1352 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00339-CR

EX PARTE TIMOTHY MICHAEL BARNETT

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-2468-1

ORDER

Timothy Michael Barnett’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of Barnett’s pretrial 

application for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed by this Court on March 13, 2014. 

Ex parte Barnett, No. 10-13-00339-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 2835 (Tex. App.—Waco 

Mar. 13, 2014, no pet. h.) (publish). He has now filed a motion requesting this Court to 

immediately issue our mandate pursuant to Rule 18.1(c). TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). Barnett 

indicates in his motion that the State agrees to the early issuance of our mandate. Id. 

Barnett’s motion is granted and the Clerk is ordered to issue the mandate in this 

appeal on the same date this order is issued.

PER CURIAM
Ex parte Barnett Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed May 1, 2014
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 2, 2007
    
    /s/ Leonard M. AnthonyLeonard M. AnthonyExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
 Page 31 of 31
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



In connection with the Annual
Report of I-many, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of I-many, Inc., certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    A. LEIGH
POWELLChairman, Chief Executive Officerand President(principal executive
officer)March 28, 2003/s/    KEVIN F.
COLLINSChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal financial and
accountingofficer)March 28, 2003