alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14801]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NM-1430-01; NMNM 95060]


Public Land Order No. 7201; Transfer of Jurisdiction; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order transfers jurisdiction of 1,262 acres of public 
land from the Bureau of Land Management to the Department of the Air 
Force for use by Holloman Air Force Base. This transfer of jurisdiction 
is directed by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
1995 (Public Law 103-337).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 12, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bernie Creager, BLM Las Cruces 
District Office, 1800 Marquess, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005, (505) 
525-4325.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 2845 of Public Law 103-337, it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, jurisdiction of the following 
described public land is hereby transferred to the Department of the 
Air Force for use by Holloman Air Force Base:

New Mexico Principal Meridian

T. 17 S., R. 8 E.,
    Sec. 21, S\1/2\N\1/2\, E\1/2\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, and NE\1/4\NE\1/4\;
    Sec. 22, W\1/2\, and W\1/2\E\1/2\;
    Sec. 27, All that part lying north of Mexico Highway 70 except 
for the E\1/2\E\1/2\;
    Sec. 28, NE\1/4\, N\1/2\SE\1/4\, SW\1/4\SE\1/4\, and W\1/2\SE\1/
4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 33, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, and W\1/2\SW\1/
4\NE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 1,262 acres in Otero County.

    2. Future use of the land shall be in accordance with and subject 
to the provisions of Section 2845 of Public Law 103-337.

    Dated: May 29, 1996.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 96-14801 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
**Exhibit 32**

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstBankFinancial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Thaddeus M. Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Lisa J.Maxwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       To myknowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|            | /s/ Thaddeus M. Williams                      |   |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|            | Thaddeus M.  Williams President and C.E.O.    |
|            | (Principal  Executive Officer)                |
|            |                                          |
|            |                                          |
|            | /s/ Lisa J.  Maxwell                          |   |
|            | Lisa J. Maxwell,  C.F.O.                      |
|            | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|            |                                          |
|            |                                          |
| August 13, 2007 |                                          |

 

1

----
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Peoples First, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year-ending December 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Hugh J. Garchinsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | BY:                                    |   | /s/ Hugh J. Garchinsky |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   | Hugh J. Garchinsky                     |
|   |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | March 16, 2004                    |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF BILL SCHAEFER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Legends Business Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:December 19, 2013  By: /s/ Bill SchaeferBill SchaeferChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

) 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 -

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

__ FILED __ LODGED 

-r==..:.R~EC::.::E:.::,:IVE~D--==~C~OPY 

\ 

JUN 1 1 2019 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant. 

I 

. , 

I . ' 

No. CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC(DTF) 

JURY QUESTIONS 

DURING TRIAL 

Jury questions during trial. 

Day2 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 267 Filed 06/11/19 Page 1 of 5
--~l'v\~r:_-~~~\Z¥:___,,__,_c;y~u~---5t1--=,~~·-=--:e~l-· ___ _ 

dr 

0' \ 

l \e.· a_, 

- ------- - -------~-----------

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 267 Filed 06/11/19 Page 2 of 5
... 

I --~--+-----~I 

I · I ! -~-----+--~_:__ __ I 

I-------'---+-----~ I 

I 

I --:--~-~+-~-----:------

I \---------:---_:__---'-----+-~-~--

I--~-:--~-+..:.._,__-----

I ·. 

I 

I i--__;__-:---:-----+------

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 267 Filed 06/11/19 Page 3 of 5
I---:--_ ---:----'---+----'--------

I 

------r-"'~._.,,,__~___i___L._!___..\,,4--+-_ __:____ ______ , 

-I 

!~-------+-~--~----.! 

I I 

I . 

I --------:-----=---+-------:----___:_;_-'-'--~?---

I 

I - -

,-

1 

. ' 

------,------,.-+-~-------: 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 267 Filed 06/11/19 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 267 Filed 06/11/19 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2022 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Richard T. Allorto, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|                             |        |                         |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr. |
| Name:                       |   | Richard T. Allorto, Jr. |
| Title:                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:                       |   | August 3, 2022          |

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
       ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officer of AskMeNow, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
with respect to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A Amendment No. 1 of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that to his knowledge:

                  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


         Date:  December 22, 2006
                                            /s/ Darryl Cohen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Darryl Cohen
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AskMeNow, Inc.
and will be retained by AskMeNow, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Cordel Ryan Curley,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-08035-001-PCT-DLR

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a 

proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant 

violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further 

finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and 

convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 9th day of December, 2019.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 6/20/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

N. LYNN PERLS,

Petitioner - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT L. DIMOND,

Respondent - Appellant.

No. 96-2009

(D. Ct. No. CIV 95-584 SC)

(D. N. Mex.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court granting appellee’s motion to

remand this action to the district court on the ground that the case presents no basis for

federal jurisdiction and, further, from an order of the district court granting petitioner’s

application for an award of expenses incurred as a result of the removal of this case from

state court. We affirm.
- 2 -

The underlying dispute in this case is clearly a fee dispute between petitioner Perls

and her former client, respondent Dimond. Petitioner Perls represented Mr. Dimond in an

employment dispute between him and his former employer, the United States Postal

Service. The parties in this case are not diverse. There is no federal question alleged on

the face of the complaint that would support federal jurisdiction. The record in this case

is clear that, despite related claims brought in the EEOC and referred to in the state court

complaint based on federal anti-discrimination statutes, this case is grounded entirely in

state contract law that will be applied in the dispute between petitioner and respondent. 

We therefore agree with the district court that the federal courts have no jurisdiction and

that the motion to remand was properly granted.

Upon an application for the award of expenses filed by petitioner, the district court

found that the reasons that respondent removed the case to federal court were groundless. 

The district court found that the removal was improper and that an award of costs was

appropriate. We review the district court’s decision for an abuse of discretion. Under the

circumstances of this case, where no meritorious grounds exist for removal of the case to

federal court, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. We have

reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district court orders, and AFFIRM for

substantially the reasons given by the district court. 
- 3 -

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Kevin Lucas Rivers, Jr., 

Defendant. 

No. CR-17-8269-PCT-DMF 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On July 26, 2018, defendant, Kevin Lucas Rivers, Jr., appeared before this Court on 

a petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the information 

provided to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining whether the defendant 

should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 

3143. 

. . . 

. . . 

. . . 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 27th day of July, 2018.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1/32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cellular Accessories
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Clifford Chapman, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
      Clifford
      Chapman


Name:
      Clifford Chapman


Title: 
       Chief Executive and Financial Officer


Date:  
      November 10, 2006
Case 2:17-mj-00590-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00590-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00590-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00590-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 4 of 4
#### Mark Thomas KRUPP, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellant.

No. 68770.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 1, 1996.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Edward A. Stierberger, Hensen, Stierber-ger, Downard & Melenbrink, Union, for respondent.

GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.

Appellant, the Director of Revenue (“Director”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County setting aside the revocation of Mark Thomas Krupp’s (“driver’s”) driving privileges, imposed pursuant to RSMo § 577.041 (1994), as barred by double jeopardy where driver had previously pled guilty to the criminal charge of driving while intoxicated, RSMo § 577.010 (1994). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision, *State v. Mayo,*915 S.W.2d 758, 762-63 (Mo.banc 1996). In *Mayo,*the court held the suspension or revocation of one’s driving privileges in an administrative proceeding is not punishment for double jeopardy purposes. *Id.*Thus, driver’s claim that his pleading guilty to criminal charges serves to bar any administrative sanctions is without merit.

Based on the foregoing, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded.

DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.
**Exhibit 12.1**

** **

Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Multicanal S.A., as*ociedad anónima* (stockcorporation) (the “Company”), does here certify, to the best of such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairlypresents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: June  30, 2003 |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
|                  | By: | /s/ Carlos  Alberto Moltini |   |
|                  | Title: | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29529-29530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14747]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Order No. 824]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 15 Kansas City, MO, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, an application from the Greater Kansas City Foreign Trade 
Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 15, for authority to expand 
its general-purpose zone, Site 3, to include the entire Kansas City 
International Airport complex, Kansas City, Missouri, was filed by the 
Board on July 26, 1995 (FTZ Docket 39-95, 60 FR 40820, 8/10/95 and 60 
FR 42645, 8/16/95); and,
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in Federal 
Register

[[Page 29530]]

and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 15 is approved, subject to the Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject to 
the standard 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of May 1996.
Paul L. Joffe,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14747 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41012

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODRIGO MENDOZA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-347-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodrigo Mendoza has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mendoza has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk