alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28903-28904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14283]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00891]


Cole Haan, Cole Haan Manufacturing Division, Lewiston, ME and 
NAFTA-00891A Livermore Falls Location Livermore, ME; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the 
Department of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance on March 25, 1996, applicable to workers of Cole 
Haan, Cole Haan Manufacturing Division, Lewiston, Maine. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on April 25, 1996 (61 FR 18418)
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information provided 
by the company shows that workers separations have occurred at the 
subject firms' Livermore, Maine location. The workers are engaged in 
the production of moccasins for Cole Haan manufacturing facilities and 
provided clerical, management and office functions in support of the 
production of moccasins.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports of moccasins. Accordingly, the Department is amending the 
certification to reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--00891 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Cole Haan, Cole Haan Manufacturing Division, 
Lewiston, Maine

[[Page 28904]]

NAFTA--00891, and Cole Haan, Livermore Falls Location, Livermore, 
Maine NAFTA--00891A engaged in employment related to the production 
of moccasins and provided clerical, management and office functions 
in support of the production of moccasins who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after March 11, 1995 are 
eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 10th day of May 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-14283 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 657 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Members of Congress who participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program 

(FEHBP) should be automatically enrolled in the public option and 

be subject to any personal income tax increases levied as a result of 

healthcare legislation, regardless of their annual gross income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2009 

Mr. DAVIS of Alabama submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Members of Congress who participate in the Federal 

Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) should 

be automatically enrolled in the public option and be 

subject to any personal income tax increases levied as 

a result of healthcare legislation, regardless of their annual gross income. 

Whereas the House of Representatives is considering as a 

part of its healthcare legislation, the establishment of a 

new public health insurance option to be offered as a 

plan choice within the Health Insurance Exchange; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 657 IH 

Whereas the goal of the public health insurance option is to 

compete with private plans in order to improve quality, 

expand choice, and contain costs within the healthcare 

system in the United States; 

Whereas the public health insurance option and its benefits 

are deemed sufficient to meet the healthcare needs of the 

people in the United States and eventually serve as the 

minimum quality standard for all health plans; 

Whereas in order to comply with PAYGO rules, the House 

is considering accessing a surtax on modified adjusted 

gross income to offset new costs associated with 

healthcare legislation; 

Whereas the House of Representatives is considering a requirement on employers to provide health insurance coverage to their employees; and 

Whereas Members of Congress should be held accountable for 

their decision to create a public health insurance option 

and restructure the healthcare system for the people of 

the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) Members of Congress who participate in the 

4 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program 

5 (FEHBP) should be automatically enrolled in the 

6 public health insurance option; 

7 (2) Members of Congress whose individual or 

8 joint modified adjusted gross incomes falls below the 

9 minimum amounts at which a surtax is imposed, 

10 shall be subject to a one percent surtax; and 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 657 IH 

1 (3) Members’ Campaign Committees should be 

2 required to provide health insurance coverage to 

3 their employees. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ivy Darlene Johnson,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

No. CV-17-04793-PHX-SMB

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is a mandate from the Ninth Circuit, informing the Court 

of the Ninth’s Circuit’s reversal and remand of this Court’s order and the ALJ’s decision 

in this case. (Doc. 39; 39-1.) 

The Ninth Circuit’s Memorandum Opinion remands this matter to the agency for 

further proceedings. (Doc. 39-1 at 7.) The Ninth Circuit directs the agency “to reevaluate 

the record—and, specifically, to consider evidence regarding mental impairments and 

symptoms—to determine whether Johnson is disabled” as “rapidly as possible on remand.” 

(Id.) 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED remanding this case for further proceedings consistent with the 

Ninth Circuit’s Memorandum Opinion. (Doc. 39-1.) 

...

...

...

Case 2:17-cv-04793-SMB Document 40 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED instructing the Clerk to enter judgment consistent 

with this order and terminate this case.

Dated this 8th day of August, 2022.

Case 2:17-cv-04793-SMB Document 40 Filed 08/08/22 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1709

NED L. PARKER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, District Judge.

(CA-00-965-2-12)

Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 19, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ned L. Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ned L. Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Parker v. City of Charleston Police Dep’t, No.

CA-00-965-2-12 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 105 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 1
EX-10n






Exhibit 10.n




Masco Corporation Consulting Arrangement with John R. Leekley, November 30, 2008




     Effective as of November 30, 2008, John R. Leekley, 65, has stepped down from his position as
Senior Vice President – General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Masco Corporation in connection
with his retirement from the Company. Following his retirement on November 30, 2008, the Company
has an arrangement with Mr. Leekley to provide consulting services to the Company during 2009, not
to exceed the equivalent of twenty percent of full time employment. Mr. Leekley will earn $200,000
for such services.
#### Clinton Robert REDMAN v. The STATE of Texas.

No. 12-90-00132-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler.

Feb. 8, 1993.

Kenneth A. Huchton, Tyler, for appellant.

Amy Blalock, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tyler, for appellee.

Opinion following Remand to Trial Court

ONION, Presiding Judge (Retired)1

On original submission, this Court, *inter alia,*remanded the cause to the trial court with instructions to conduct a *Batson v. Kentucky,*476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), hearing. That hearing has been conducted and the trial court has transmitted the record and its findings of facts and conclusions of law to this Court.

Thereafter, Appellant and the State were advised of their right to rebrief the *Batson*issue. *See Robinson v. State,*790 S.W.2d 334, 335 (Tex.Cr.App.1990).

Appellant, in his supplemental brief, contends that the record following remand now shows a violation of the *Batson*rule that a prosecutor violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Constitution, by challenging potential jurors solely on the basis of race. *See Batson,*476 U.S. at 89, 106 S.Ct. at 1719; Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 35.261 (Vernon 1989). The State has filed no supplemental brief.

The trial court found that Appellant was black and that the State exercised peremptory challenges against prospective jurors, Webb and Carey, the only blacks on the jury panel. The trial court in effect con-*717eluded that Appellant had established a *prima facie*showing of racial discrimination and that the State’s reasons for exercising its peremptory strikes against Webb and Carey “were not racially neutral as to the case on trial and were speculative in nature.” The record supports the trial court’s findings and conclusions. Appellant’s point of error following remand is sustained.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court.

1

. The panel before whom this cause was submitted consisted of John F. Onion, Jr., Presiding Judge (Retired), Court of Criminal Appeals, Stephen F. Preslar, Chief Justice (Retired), El Paso Court of Appeals, and Raleigh Brown, Justice (Retired), Eastland Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to Tex.Gov’t Code Ann. § 74.003(b) (Vernon 1988).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14566]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for 
Hispanic Americans; Meeting

AGENCY: President's Advisory Commission on Education Excellence for 
Hispanic Americans.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the President's Advisory Commission on 
Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. This notice also 
describes the functions of the Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: Wednesday, June 19 and Thursday, June 20, 1996.

TIME: 5:30 p.m. (est) and 1:30 p.m.-5 p.m. (est).

ADDRESS: Call Vanessa Rini at (202) 401-2147.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vanessa Rini, Special Assistant, White House Initiative on Educational 
Excellence for Hispanic Americans. Her mailing address is U.S. 
Department of Education, 600 Independence Ave SW, RM 2115, Washington, 
DC 20202-3601 and her e-mail address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a1c0b040f19190b35353535180304032a0f0e440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="760017181305051729292929041f181f36131258111900">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The President's Advisory Commission on 
Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans was established under 
Executive Order 12900, which was effective on February 22, 1994. The 
Commission was established to provide the President and the Secretary 
of Education with advice on (a) the progress of Hispanic Americans 
toward achievement of the National Goals and other standards of 
educational accomplishment; (b) the development, monitoring, and 
education for Hispanic Americans; (c) ways to increase State, private 
sector, and community involvement in improving education; and (d) ways 
to expand and complement Federal education initiatives.

    This meeting is open to the public. The Commission will be 
formulating a plan to ensure the recommendations in its annual report 
to the President are carried out and planning its course of action for 
the upcoming year.
    Records are kept of all Council proceedings, and are available for 
public inspection at the office of the White House Initiative on 
Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans from the hours of 9 a.m. 
to 5 p.m. (est)
G. Mario Moreno,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14566 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Sub-account Bonus Endorsement

This  endorsement  forms a part of the  contract to which it is  attached.  This
bonus is guaranteed and will be paid as described below.

     A bonus of .0125%  (.15% on an  annualized  basis) will be credited to your
     variable  account  value if the contract  value is greater than or equal to
     $100,000. This bonus is credited on each monthly anniversary day.

In all other respects, the terms, conditions and provisions of the contract will
remain the same.

Signed for Kansas City Life  Insurance  Company,  a stock  company,  at its Home
Office, 3520 Broadway, PO Box 419139, Kansas City, MO 64141-6139.

         /s/ C. John Malacarne                 /s/ R. Philip Bixby

                Secretary                            President
**Exhibit31.2**

CERTIFICATION OFTHE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 

RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT, AS AMENDED

I, Michael J. Sullivan, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of IHS Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has material affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date: June 27, 2007
| /s/ Michael J. Sullivan                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J.  Sullivan                                  |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Order entered April 28, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01340

- CR

EX PARTE CARLOS MALD ONADO

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. WX19

- 00005

- Q

ORDER

Before the Court is t he State’s April 23, 2020 second motion for extension

of time to file its brief . The State has tendered its brief with the motion. We

GRANT t he State ’s motion and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s

brief on the date of this order.
This appeal will be submitted without argument on June 2, 2020
to a panel consisting of Justices Bridges, Pedersen, and Evans.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cytta Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Stephen  Spalding,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that;

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Stephen Spalding
---------------------------------
Name:  Stephen Spalding
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 19, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13959]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following meeting:
    Name of Committee: Ad Hoc Speech and Speech Disorders Subcommittee 
of the National Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Advisory 
Council.
    Date: July 16, 1996.
    Time: 1-3 p.m. (telephone conference)
    Place: National Institutes of Health Building 31C, Conference Room 
8, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Mr. Baldwin Wong, Program Analyst, NIDCD/PPHRB, 31 
Center Drive, MSC 2320, room 3C-31, Bethesda, MD 20892-2320, (301) 496-
7243.
    Purpose: To recommend individuals to serve on a scientific panel to 
update the speech and speech disorders section of the Research Plan.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United States Code. These 
discussions could reveal personal information concerning these 
individuals,, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: May 29, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13959 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M