alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Complaint of Julio Salas and Monica Salas

As owners of the vessel “AZ 5368 BG.: and 

her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc.,

Plaintiffs-in-Limitation.

For Exoneration from or Limitation of 

Liability.

No. CV-18-08019-PCT-JJT

ORDER 

A conflict in the Court’s calendar requires the resetting of the September 10, 2019

Status Hearing (Doc. 52). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED vacating the telephonic Status Hearing in this matter set for 10:00 

a.m. on September 10, 2019, and resetting it for September 19, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. in 

Courtroom 505, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J. 

Tuchi. Chambers will e-mail dial-in instructions to counsel prior to the hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that since Claimant Karen Rea has not provided the 

Court with an e-mail address, Petitioners’ counsel shall provide a copy of this Order to 

Claimant Rea.

Dated this 9th day of September, 2019.

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Tempe Hospitality Ventures LLC, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-18-00452-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 This matter having recently come before this Court, 

 IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and 

motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would 

be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. Therefore, the 

parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of a motion to dismiss or motion to strike 

to determine whether it can be avoided. Consequently, motions to dismiss and motions to 

strike must be accompanied by a notice of certification of conferral, indicating that the 

parties have conferred to determine whether an amendment could cure a deficient 

pleading, and have been unable to agree that the pleading is curable by a permissible 

amendment. In addition, parties shall endeavor not to oppose motions to amend that are 

filed prior to the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference or within the time set for the Rule 16 

Case Management Order. Motions to dismiss and motions to strike that do not contain the 

required certification are subject to striking on the Court's own motion. 

Case 2:18-cv-00452-JJT Document 6 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on 

Defendants. 

 Dated this 12th day of February, 2018. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00452-JJT Document 6 Filed 02/12/18 Page 2 of 2
----

| SUBSIDIARY |                                   | STATE      OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION |
|------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|       |                                   |                                   |
| 1.         | Dynegy      Holdings Inc.              | Delaware                               |
| 2.         | Illinova      Corporation              | Illinois                               |
| 3.         | DMT      Holdings,  Inc.     | Delaware                               |
| 4.         | Dynegy      Falcon Holdings Inc.       | Delaware                               |
| 5.         | Dynegy      Midwest Generation, Inc.   | Illinois                               |
| 6.         | Dynegy      Northeast Generation, Inc. | Delaware                               |

----
#### UTILICORP UNITED, INC., Appellant, v. CHEATHAM PARTNERSHIP, Charles R. Barlow and Johnnie M. Barlow, Respondents.

No. WD 48838.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 21, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 2, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied June 20, 1995.

Gary J. Brouillette, Kansas City, for appellant.

Robert G. Russell, Sedalia, for respondent Cheatham Partnership.

Robert E. Harris, Warrensburg, for respondents Charles R. Barlow and Johnnie M. Barlow.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from trial court’s order dismissing condemnation exceptions for failure to prosecute.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Asia Cork Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



April 12, 2009



|    |                     | 
|--- | ------------------- | 
|By: | /s/ PENGCHENG CHEN  | 
|    | Pengcheng Chen, CEO
EXHIBIT 1

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 1 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 2 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 3 of 35
U.S. v. Scott Daniel Warren 677

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 4 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 5 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 6 of 35
U.S. v. Scott Daniel Warren 680

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 7 of 35
U.S. v. Scott Daniel Warren 681

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 8 of 35
U.S. v. Scott Daniel Warren 682

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 9 of 35
EXHIBIT 2

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 10 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 11 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 12 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 13 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 14 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 15 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 16 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 17 of 35
U.S. v. Scott Daniel Warren 690

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 18 of 35
EXHIBIT 3

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 19 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 20 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 21 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 22 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 23 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 24 of 35
EXHIBIT 6

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 25 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 26 of 35
EXHIBIT 9

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 27 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 28 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 29 of 35
US v. Scott Daniel Warren (18 CR-223) 918

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 30 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 31 of 35
Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 32 of 35
US v. Scott Daniel Warren (18 CR-223) 921

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 33 of 35
US v. Scott Daniel Warren (18 CR-223) 922

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 34 of 35
US v. Scott Daniel Warren (18 CR-223) 923

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 313-2 Filed 07/19/19 Page 35 of 35
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13741]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Vaccine Production Facility.
    Date: June 11, 1996.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: Bethesda Ramada, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814, (301) 654-1000.
    Contact Person: Dr. Madelon C. Halula, Scientific Review Adm., 
6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C16, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 402-2636.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate contract proposals.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: May 28, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13741 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15012]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry (#1191).
    Date and Time: July 1-2, 1996, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: University of Texas, Austin, TX.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Karolyn K. Eisenstein, Program Director, Office 
of Special Projects, Chemistry Division, Room 1055, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 
306-1850.
    Purpose of Meeting: To review the renewal proposal, evaluate the 
Science and Technology Center, and make a recommendation concerning 
future funding of the Science and Technology Center.
    Agenda: To evaluate: (a) the research program; (b) educational 
and outreach activities; and (3) the knowledge transfer activities 
and the management of the STC. To make a recommendation on the 
future funding of the STC.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are within exemptions (4) and (6) of 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c), the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 10, 1996.
[FR Doc. 96-15012 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 63 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 63

       Supporting the goals and ideals of the Knights of Pythias.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

  Mr. King of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Supporting the goals and ideals of the Knights of Pythias.

Whereas the Pythians promote cooperation, friendship, and good will to and 
        between all people;
Whereas the Knights of Pythias is an international fraternity that was founded 
        in Washington, DC, on February 19, 1864, by Justus H. Rathbone and 
        embraces approximately 2,000 lodges in the United States, Canada, and 
        France;
Whereas the Knights of Pythias was the first American fraternity chartered by an 
        Act of Congress of the United States;
Whereas the primary goal of the Knights of Pythias is to promote friendship 
        among men and to relieve suffering;
Whereas the distinguishing principles of the lodges and the entire Knights of 
        Pythias fraternity is friendship, charity, and benevolence;
Whereas the order began 1 year prior to the termination of the Civil War and its 
        early members believed that it might help to heal the wounds and allay 
        the hatred of civil conflict;
Whereas President Abraham Lincoln stated, ``The purposes of your organization 
        are most wonderful; if we could but bring its spirit to all our 
        citizenry, what a wonderful thing it would be'';
Whereas the Knights of Pythias seeks practical application of charitable 
        principles to everyday life for its members;
Whereas the Knights of Pythias is dedicated to the cause of universal peace and 
        is pledged to the promotion of men of good will as the surest means of 
        attaining it;
Whereas the Knights of Pythias works with the Boy Scouts of America to assist 
        and reward scouts to further achieve within its organization;
Whereas Pythians know one way to happiness is through service to mankind;
Whereas Pythians believe that friendship is an essential ingredient in life;
Whereas Pythians make benevolence, kindness, generosity, and tolerance a reality 
        in their lives; and
Whereas Pythians are eager to enhance the communities in which they live: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and 
ideals of the Knights of Pythias.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51704 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. APOLINAR GUADALUPE HOLGUIN-GONZALEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2102-ALL Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel f or Apolinar Guadalupe Holguin-Gonzalez (Holguin) has moved for leave to withdraw and has f iled a brief in accordance with Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Holguin has been deported and has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 06-51704

2 excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5 TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Candev Resource Exploration, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark McLeary, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: June 11, 2008/s/ Mark McLearyMark McLeary
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer   F:\CC\11542.001\FINST\2008Q2(APR.30)\EX32-1.DOC
_________________

_________________ 1 Cite as: 55 0 U
. S. ____ (2007) Opinion in Chambers 

## SUPREME CO URT O FTHE UNI TED STATES
Nos. 06A 100 1 an d 06A1 0 0 2 (06– 119 5 an d 06– 11 96) LAKHDAR BOUM EDI E NE ET AL . 06–1195 v. GE OR GE W. BUS H , PRE S IDE N T OF T H E UNITE D STAT ES, ET AL . KH AL ED A. F
. ALODAH , NE XTF R I E N D OF FAWZI

KH ALID A B DU LLA H FAH AD AL OD AH, ET AL . 06–1196 v. UNITE D STATE S ET AL . ON APPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND SUSP ENSIO N OF ORDER DENYING CER TIORARI [Apr il 26, 20 0 7 ] C HIEF J UST I CE R OBERT S , Circuit J u stice. We denied applicants’ petitions for certiora ri, 549 U. S. ___ (2007), and they now bring two requests: first, a 122

- day extension of time in which to f ile a petition for rehear

ing of the order denyin g certiorari, and second, suspension of the order denying certiorari. Both applications are denied. 1. This Court’ s Rules expressly provide for extensions of time in which to file a petiti on for writ of cer t iorari, Rule 13.5, or a petition for rehearing of a “judgmen t or decision

. . . on the merits,” Rule 44.1, but they do not provide for any extension of time in which to f ile a petition for rehear

ing of an order denying certiorari. Such an order is plainly not a “judg m ent or decision . . . on the meri ts.” Indeed, while Rule 44.1 estab lishes a 25 -day period for filing a petition for rehearing of a ju dgment on the merits “unless the Court or a Justice shortens or extends the time,” Rule2 BOUM EDIENE v. BUSH Opinion in Chambers 44.2, articulating a 25-day period for filing a petition for rehearing of an order denying ce rtiorari, contains no such exception, confirming that the Ru les do not contemplate granting anextension for such petitions. 2. An orde r denying certiorari “will not be s u spended pending disposition of a petiti on for rehearing exceptby order of th e Court or a Justice.” Rule 16.3. This most extraordina ry relief wi ll not be granted unles s there is a “reasonable likelihood of this Court’s re versing its previ

ous position and gran ting cer t iorari.” Richmondv. Ari

zona , 434 U. S. 1323 (1977) (Rehnquist, J., in chambers). In arguing for suspen sion, applic ants point to a motion filed by the Government in the D i strict Cour t as part of ongoing proceedings below. Th ey contend that, if th e motion is gr anted, or if certain other actions are taken b y the lower courts, there will be an adverse effect on the review available to them under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 , Tit. X, 119 Stat. 273 9. This does not satis f y the rigorous standard we have es tablished for Rule 16.3 relief. App licants do not even po int to any action by t h e lower courts as prompting th eir request for extraordina r y relief—onlythe filing of motions and possiblecourt ac tion. Such grounds can hardly provide abasis for believing this Court would reverse c o urse andgr ant cer t iorari. Ac cord

ingly, suspension of the order is not warran t ed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47

October 31, 2000



John Gorst
Chief Executive Officer
Insynq. Inc.
1101 Broadway Plaza
Tacoma, WA 98402


Dear Mr. Gorst:

SUBJECT: CONSULTING AGREEMENT

Insynq, Inc. agrees to engage CFB Associates, Inc. and specifically Charles F.
Benton, CPA to consult on general operational issues of Insynq, Inc. for a
period of three months as Mr. Benton's schedule permits.  The fee for this
service will be billable at $350 per hour.  It is agreed that Mr. Benton has
provided consulting services with a value of $15,050 before the commencement
date.  Consultant is guaranteed a minimum of an additional 86 hours at the rate
of $350 per hour.

$5,000 shall be paid by Insynq, Inc. to CFB Associates, Inc. on the last
business day of each month starting November 30, 2000 for eight consecutive
monthly payments and a final payment on July 31, 2001 of $5,150.  Late payments
will incur a late payment penalty of twenty percent of the balance due for each
late payment.  This agreement is non-cancelable.

Sincerely,


/s/ Charles Benton
------------------------------------------
Charles F. Benton, CPA
CFB Associates, Inc.


The above is acceptable to Insynq, Inc.


/s/ John P. Gorst
------------------------------------------
By: John P. Gorst, Chief Executive Officer
    Insynq, Inc.
EXHIBIT
        32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL ADVANCE CORP. (the “Company”) On
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Oren Rozenberg, President
      and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




i.  The
      certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) or Rule
      15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).





ii.A
      certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
      purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
      liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
      incorporates it by reference.




/s/
              Oren
              RozenbergOren
                Rozenberg
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)