Cm NIN Dn BR WN

Ww NY KY NY KY NY NN YN KH He Be Be Se Be Se Be RS eS
erXI ANA KF WH KH SO we NADH FF WN YK SS

with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an
attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver
the defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in
connection with a court proceeding.

PART IV -- APPEALS AND THIRD PARTY RELEASE

IT IS ORDERED that should an appeal of this detention order be filed with the
District Court, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion for
review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing set before
the District Court. Pursuant to Rule 59(a), FED.R.CRIMLP., effective December 1, 2009,
Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy of this order or
after the oral order is stated on the record within which to file specific written objections
with the district court. Failure to timely file objections in accordance with Rule 59(a)
may waive the right to review. 59(a), FED.R.CRIM.P.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it
is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing
before the District Court to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and
investigate the potential third party custodian.

DATE: 2/5/2018

a ——

James F. Metcalf
United States Magistrate Judge



Cm NI DWH BF WN

OSE Se CE © On OE CE On © ee
SCADA BOND KF SO we NADA NF WN HK SC

¥

Report, except:

Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, placing him/her beyond the
jurisdiction of this Court.

The defendant has no significant contacts in the United States or in the

istrict of Arizona.

v) The defendant has no resources in the United States from which he/she
might make a bond reasonably calculated to assure his/her future appearance.
C1 The defendant has a prior criminal history.
C1 The defendant lives and works in Mexico.
(1 The defendant is an amnesty applicant but has no substantial ties in Arizona
or in the United States and has substantial family ties to Mexico.
C1 _ There is a record of prior failure to comply with court order.
CO The defendant attempted to evade law enforcement contact by fleeing from
law enforcement.
[1 The defendant is facing a minimum mandatory of

incarceration and a maximum of

The defendant does not dispute the information contained in the Pretrial Services

oO

In addition:

The Court incorporates by reference the findings of the Pretrial Services Agency

which were reviewed by the Court at the time of the hearing in this matter.

PART III -- DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION
The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her

designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending

appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation

-4-



Co oN DWH FF WN

Ww NY KH NY NY NY NN WN NO HY Be Se Se Be Se Se Se ee eS
CoN DAA BF wWwH KF DO ONDA NH FF WN YK CS

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, NO. 18-01103MJ-001
Plaintiff, ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING
TRIAL
v.

Samuel Lugo-Aceves,

Defendant.

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing
has been submitted. I conclude that the following facts are established:
(Check one or both, as applicable.)
C1 by clear and convincing evidence the defendant is a danger to the community and
require the detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.

by a preponderance of the evidence the defendant is a serious flight risk and
require the detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.

PART I -- FINDINGS OF FACT

C1 (1) 18U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2)(A): The defendant has been convicted of a (federal
offense)(state or local offense that would have been a federal offense if a circumstance
giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed) that is

CJ  acrime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).

(1 — anoffense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.

OO an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or



CoN DH WHA BF WH

ww NY NY NY NY NN NN YN He Be Be ee ee Be Be eS
ord DAA BW NH KF SDO HAA DUH FF WN F SO

more is prescribed in a

Ca felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted of two
or more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C. §3142(f)(1)(A)-(C), or
comparable state or local offenses.
C any felony that involves a minor victim or that involves the possession or
use of a firearm or destructive device (as those terms are defined in section 921),
or any other dangerous weapon, or involves a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. §
2250.
Ol (2) 18 US.C. § 3142(e)(2)(B): The offense described in finding 1 was
committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local
offense.
O (3) 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2)(C): A period of not more than five years has
elapsed since the (date of conviction)(release of the defendant from imprisonment) for the
offense described in finding 1.
fa] (4) . Findings Nos. (1), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no
condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of (an)other
person(s) and the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this
presumption.
Alternative Findings
O (1) 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3): There is probable cause to believe that the
defendant has committed an offense
O for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is
prescribed in
C1 under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), 956(a), or 2332(b).
CO under 18 U.S.C. § 1581-1594, for which a maximum term of imprisonment

of 20 years or more is prescribed.

| Insert as applicable: (a) Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.); (b) Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. § 951 et seq.); or (c) Section | of Act of Sept. 15, 1980 (21
U.S.C. § 955a).

22%.



SOMO RQ DAH FB WHY

ww NY NY NY NY NY NN NO Bee eye Be Be Re Re Re
CAI DAA BF wWwHK DD OMNIA DHA FP WHY

(san offense involving a minor victim under section 18U.S.C. §
2

[1 (2) _ The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding 1
that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of
the defendant as required and the safety of the community.

Alternative Findings
{1 (1) There is a serious risk that the defendant will flee; no condition or
combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as
required.
C1 (2) Nocondition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety
of others and the community.
(1 ©) There is a serious risk that the defendant will (obstruct or attempt to

obstruct justice) (threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror).

O @)

PART II -- WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION
(Check one or both, as applicable.)

1 () _ I find that the credible testimony and information’ submitted at the hearing

establishes by clear and convincing evidence as to danger that:

M (2) I find that a preponderance of the evidence as to risk of flight that:
Ps The defendant is not a citizen of the United States.
The defendant, at the time of the charged offense, was in the United States
illegally.
Wi If released herein, the defendant faces deportation proceedings by the

2 Insert as applicable 18 U.S.C. §§1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1), 2245, 2251, 2251(a),
2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252(a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.

3 The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation

and consideration of information at the detention hearing. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)
for the factors to be taken into account.

“3 «