alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Agreement


                                    Between:
           Swiftnet limited and Abraham Keinan (Hereinafter Swiftnet)
                                       And
                         Campbeltown Business Ltd. (CT)



1)       CT through its directors has introduced  Swiftnet to various  financial
         and business opportunities that are already taken  advantage by and /or
         explored by Swiftnet.
2)       Swiftnet hires CT as its financial and business development consultant.
3)       Swiftnet will pay CT 2000 UK pounds per month.
4)       In addition to paragraph "3" Swiftnet will pay CT a performance related
         payment as follows:

         a)  In a month  that Swiftnet revenues are between  125,000  to 150,000
             Pounds additional amount of 1,250  Pounds (sums to 3,250 Pounds per
             month)
         b)  In  a month  that  revenues  are  between 150,000 - 175,000 Pounds,
             additional amount of 2,500 Pounds (sums to 4,500 Pounds).
         c)  In  a month  that revenues  exceed  175,000  Pounds: additional 275
             Pounds (sums to 4,750 Pounds per   month).

5)       This agreement is for 18 months and will be renewed by mutual agreement
         of Swiftnet and CT.
6)       Swiftnet has the option to terminate the agreement if Mr. Guy Nissenson
         and Mr. Haim Nissenson are not involved with CT.

Signatures & Dates:



---------------------                           --------------------
Swiftnet Ltd                                    Campbeltown Business Ltd.



----------------------
Abraham Keinan
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6291

EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLIE TRUESDALE, in his individual and

official capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-3665-3-17BC)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

because Appellant alleges only malicious prosecution which is not

cognizable until the criminal proceedings against Appellant are

terminated in his favor, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Reliford v. Truesdale, No. CA-95-3665-3-17BC (D.S.C.

Jan. 18, 1996). See also Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem, 85 F.3d

178, 183 (4th Cir. 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 555 

Expressing concern for the well-being of journalists Laura Ling and Euna 

Lee and urging the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic 

of Korea to release them on humanitarian grounds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2009 

Mr. SCHIFF submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing concern for the well-being of journalists Laura 

Ling and Euna Lee and urging the Government of the 

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to release them 

on humanitarian grounds. 

Whereas Laura Ling is a United States journalist who was 

born in 1976 and graduated with a communications degree from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 

1998; 

Whereas Ms. Ling joined Channel One as an associate producer in 1999, eventually becoming a producer; 

Whereas Ms. Ling is married to Iain Clayton who, along with 

her other family members, loves and misses her; 

Whereas Euna Lee is a journalist who was born in South 

Korea in 1972 and, after moving to the United States for 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 555 IH 

college, graduated with a Bachelors of Fine Arts in Film 

and Broadcasting from the Academy of Art University in 

2001; 

Whereas since 2000, Ms. Lee has worked as a film and video 

editor for several television stations and production companies in the San Francisco Bay area of California; 

Whereas Ms. Lee is married to Michael Saldate and is the 

mother of a four year old daughter, Hannah, both of 

whom, along with her other family members, love and 

miss her; 

Whereas Ms. Ling and Ms. Lee have been detained by the 

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea since March 

2009; 

Whereas Ms. Ling and Ms. Lee were tried by the Democratic 

People’s Republic of Korea in a proceeding that began on 

June 4, 2009; 

Whereas, on June 8, 2009, the Korean Central News Agency 

reported that Ms. Ling and Ms. Lee had been convicted 

and sentenced to 12 years of hard labor; 

Whereas the families of Ms. Lee and Ms. Ling have stated 

that, if the journalists broke the law, the families apologize; and 

Whereas Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has 

called upon the Government of North Korea to release 

the journalists, saying ‘‘We think the imprisonment, trial 

and sentencing of Laura and Euna should be viewed as 

a humanitarian matter. We hope that the North Koreans 

will grant clemency and deport them.’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 555 IH 

1 (1) urges the Government of the Democratic 

2 People’s Republic of Korea to grant clemency to 

3 Laura Ling and Euna Lee and return them to the 

4 United States; 

5 (2) supports efforts by President Barack 

6 Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, and others to se7 cure the release of the journalists on humanitarian 

8 grounds; and 

9 (3) urges other nations to encourage North 

10 Korea to free Ms. Ling and Ms. Lee on humani11 tarian grounds and return them to the United 

12 States. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Complaint of Julio Salas and Monica Salas

As owners of the vessel “AZ 5368 BG.: and 

her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc.,

Plaintiffs-in-Limitation.

For Exoneration from or Limitation of 

Liability.

No. CV-18-08019-PCT-JJT

AMENDED ORDER 

(Correcting date of telephonic hearing)

At issue is Plaintiffs-in-Limitation Julio Salas and Monica Salas’s Application for 

Entry of Default against Claimants Karen Rea and The Estate of Henry Rea (Doc. 47). The 

Court will deny the Application because Claimants already filed an Answer (Doc. 18). 

However, after granting Claimants’ attorney’s Motion to Withdraw (Docs. 35, 36), the 

Court ordered Claimants to obtain new legal representation and file notices of appearance 

by April 1, 2019.1(Doc. 39.) Neither Karen Rea nor The Estate of Henry Rea has filed a 

notice of appearance and thus each has failed to comply with the Court’s March 7 Order. 

The Court advises and warns Claimants that if they fail to comply with every 

provision of this or any other Order of the Court, they may be subject to sanction, up to 

and including judgment in limitation as sought by Plaintiffs-in-Limitation, upon notice and 

an opportunity to be heard. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiffs-in-Limitations’ Application 

 

1 Claimant Karen Rea has the option to obtain new counsel or proceed as a pro se

party. (Doc. 39 at 1.) 
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

for Entry of Default (Doc. 47). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a telephonic Status Hearing in this matter 

for 10:00 a.m. on September 10, 2019, in Courtroom 505, 401 W. Washington Street, 

Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J. Tuchi. Chambers will e-mail dial-in instructions 

to counsel.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rea Claimants shall have retained counsel 

who shall have filed a notice of appearance and represent them at the status hearing or shall 

show cause why the Court should not enter judgment of limitation for Plaintiffs-inLimitation and against the Rea Claimants only. 

Dated this 19th day of August, 2019.

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge
**Exhibit 23.01**

** **

**Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants**

 

Board of Directors

I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc.

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S–8 (333–63871)and (333-46916) of our reports dated February 22, 2002 relating to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of I.C. Isaacs &Company, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10–Kfor the year ended December 31, 2001.

 

BDOSeidman, LLP

 

Washington, D.C.

March29, 2002

 

54

----
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, MARK McLEARY, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Candev
Resource Exploration Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: September 11, 2008 | /s/ Mark McLeary           
|------------------------ | ---------------------------
|                         | Mark McLeary               
|                         | Chief Executive Officer and
|                         | Chief Financial Officer    

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2



       STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF INDUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Transition Report of Indus International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey A. Babka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey A. Babka
----------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Babka
Executive Vice President Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
June 30, 2003


                                      74
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Monique Portillo, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Philip Brailsford, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00178-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Counsel for Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Praecipe” wherein he asks the Court 

to enter a default judgment against Defendant Charles Langley. A review of the docket 

reflects no application supported by an affidavit for entry of a default as required by and as 

a prerequisite to an Application for Default Judgment. Rule 55, Fed. R. Civ. P. Defendant 

Langley has responded in opposition to Plaintiff’s request for a default judgment. Plaintiff 

has not replied. Defendant Langley has also filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 58). 

 IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Request for a Default Judgment because a 

default was not entered before Defendant Langley filed his responsive pleading (Doc. 55). 

 Dated this 1st day of February, 2019. 

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 59 Filed 02/01/19 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
listed below of Indus International, Inc. of our report dated April 30, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Indus International,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31,
2004:

1. Registration Statement Number 333-36995 on Form S-8
2. Registration Statement Number 333-44438 on Form S-8
3. Registration Statement Number 333-64632 on Form S-8
4. Registration Statement Number 333-70475 on Form S-8
5. Registration Statement Number 333-104028 on Form S-3
6. Registration Statement Number 333-107553 on Form S-8
7. Registration Statement Number 333-107640 on Form S-3
8. Registration Statement Number 333-112434 on Form S-8
9. Registration Statement Number 333-113143 on Form S-3

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
June 11, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AFC Enterprises, Inc. (the "Corporation")
for the period ended December 29, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chief Financial Officer, certifies that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

Date:  December 15, 2003
                                                   /s/ Frank J. Belatti
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Frank J. Belatti
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6294
R. J. KEYSTONE, a/k/a Randall J. Keyes, Petitioner - Appellant, versus D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-189-7) Submitted: August 3, 2005 Decided: August 18, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. R. J. Keystone, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: R. J. Keystone, a.k.a. Randall J. Keyes, a Virginia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Keystone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1379]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,611]


Plains Blouse Company, Plains, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on November 6, 1995 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed by the northeastern Pennsylvania District Council of 
Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, on behalf of 
workers and former workers at Plains Blouse Company, located in Plains, 
Pennsylvania (TA-W-31,611).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of December 1995.
Arlene O'Connor,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-1379 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

 

I, Kevin R. Hoben, Chief Executive Officer, Omega Flex, Inc., certify that: 

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

 (c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses (if any) in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  March 31, 2007 

 

/s/ Kevin R. Hoben__________________________

 

Kevin R. Hoben

Chief Executive Officer

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
Case 2:18-cv-00382-SMB Document 11 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 1