alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14830]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-266-000]


Overthrust Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 6, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 4, 1996, Overthrust Pipeline Company 
(Overthrust) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1 and First Revised Volume No. 1-A, the below-
listed tariff sheets, to be effective July 5, 1996:

Original Volume No. 1

Third Revised Sheet No. 1

First Revised Volume No. 1-A

Revised Title Page
First Revised Sheet Nos. 1 and 68
Second Revised Sheet Nos. 43 and 69
Third Revised Sheet Nos. 30 and 70

    Overthrust states that the proposed tariff sheets revise its tariff 
to reflect changes required by Commission Order Nos. 581, 581-A, and 
582 and 582-A.
    Over thrust states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
its customers and the Wyoming Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests must be as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14830 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0103

_________________

SKYLINE CONSULTING GROUP,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

MORTENSEN WOODWORK, INC.,

 Defendant and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause was classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court on August 17, 2022. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Rienne H. McElyea, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2022

09/30/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0103
#### In the Matter of Grant Bryant, Petitioner, against Busch’s Kredit Jewelry Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

March 20, 1956.

*Snitow & Snitow*for petitioner.

Matthew *Siegler*and *Edwin H. Friedman*for respondent.

Morris Eder, J.

Upon the foregoing papers this application to vacate a wage assignment is denied, without prejudice. Petitioner alleges that the assignment executed in 1946 has at no time been filed in the County Clerk’s office but that a copy thereof was served in January, 1956, upon his employer. Respondent submits only a memorandum in opposition, contending that, whatever petitioner’s rights in a plenary action, no relief is available on these facts in this proceeding. That, unfortunately, appears to be the only conclusion deducible from the statute (Personal Property Law, § 47). Section 47-e, entitled *“*Vacating of an assignment by order of court”, provides that the proceeding be instituted by service of a notice to show cause *“*at a special term of a court of record in a county in which the assignment or a copy thereof is filed ”, Where none has been filed, no court can, in accordance with *953the statute, have jurisdiction of this summary remedy *(Matter of Tyd*v. *Local Loan Co.,*183 Misc. 139). Section 47 (formerly 47-h) does provide that the assignment or a copy thereof must be filed with the County Clerk before it may be filed with the assignor’s employer. But no specific remedy is provided for the failure to observe this requirement, and by its very terms the special proceeding of 47-e may not be then invoked. However, it is quite clear that, if such be the facts, the service upon the employer is without any legal effect and may be disregarded without fear of consequences. If assignor, however, desires a determination canceling the assignment on any of the grounds asserted, the remedy is by action in equity.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Elder, Clemen ts and Senior Judge Annunziata

PEARLINE M. BARLOW MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2418-07-1 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 12, 2008 FARM FRESH SUPERMARKET #44205 AND SUPERVALU, INC.

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Leon R. Sarfan; Sarfan & Nachma n, L.L.C., on brief), for appellant.

(Steven H. Theisen; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, on brief), for appellees.

Pearline M. Barlow appe als a decision of the Work ers’ Compensation Commission

finding that she failed to prove sh e sustained an injury by accident arising out of her employment

on February 7, 2006. We have reviewed the reco rd and the commission’ s opinion and find that

this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in

its final opinion. See Barlow v. Farm Fresh Supermarket #44205 , VWC File No. 227-37-29

(Sept. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argum ent and summarily affirm because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in th e materials before the Court and argument would

not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
EXHIBIT 23.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-34875 of U S Liquids Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos.333-34689 and 333-93129 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 18, 2003,March 10, 2003 as to Note 3 and June 24, 2003, as to Note 23, (which expressesan unqualified opinion and includes three explanatory paragraphs relating tosubstantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern asdiscussed in Note 3; the change in accounting for the disposal of long-livedassets and for goodwill and intangible assets as discussed in Notes 6 and 10;and the restatement described in Note 23), appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K/A of U S Liquids Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13956]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Center for Human Genome Research; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:
    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant application and/or 
contract proposals.
    Name of Committee: Human Genome Research Initial Review Group.
    Date: June 24-25, 1996.
    Time: June 24, 6:00 pm to recess, June 25, 8:30 am to adjournment.
    Place: NIH, Natcher (Building 45), Rooms F1 and F2, 9000 Rockville 
Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    Contact Person: Ms. Linda Engel, Chief, Office of Scientific 
Review, National Center for Human Genome Research, National Institutes 
of Health, Building 38A, Room 604, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 402-
0838.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
applications and/or contract proposals, and the discussions could 
reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with applications, the disclosure of which would constitute 
a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Assistance Program No. 93.172, Human Genome 
Research.)

    Date: May 29, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13956 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29566-29567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14723]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Quarterly Report of IV-F Expenditures Uniform Reporting 
Requirements.
    OMB No.: 0970-0116.
    Description: The ACF-332 report will be used by States to report 
IV-F expenditures by component and activity on a quarterly basis. The 
data are used by personnel in the Administration for Children and 
Families, the Department (DHHS), and other Federal personnel 
responsible for the formulation of JOBS program and budget policy.
    Respondents: State governments.

Annual Burden Estimates

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Average         
                                            Number of   burden    Total 
         Instrument            Number of    responses    hours    burden
                              respondents      per        per     hours 
                                           respondent  response         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACF-332.....................         54            4         12    2,592
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,592.                             

Additional Information

    Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to The 
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Information 
Services, Division of Information Resource Management Services, 370 
L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports 
Clearance Officer.

OMB Comment

    OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of 
information between 30 and 60 days after

[[Page 29567]]

publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a 
comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it 
within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for 
the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the 
following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction 
Project, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy 
Taylor.

    Dated: May 10, 1996.
Roberta Katson,
Director, Office of Information Resource Management Services.
[FR Doc. 96-14723 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 207 P A1 4 11 June 2015 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. CURTIS MARIO BENTON

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 31 of a unanimous , unpublished d ecision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 62 S.E.2d 1 (20 1 4 ), reversing an order entered on 25 April 2013 by Judge Ronald E. Spivey , and vacating a judgment dated 6 May 2013 and entered on 15 May 2013 by Judge David L. Hall, in S uperior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 19 March 2015

. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, b y Derrick C. Mertz , Assistant Attorney General, for the State

- appellant. Mark L. Hayes for defendant

- appellee.

PER CURIAM

.
In State v. Jackson , the Court of Appeals concluded in a divided opinion that the stop of the defendant in that case, Tiyoun Jimek Jackson , was not sup ported by reasonable suspicion. ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 758 S.E.2d 39 , 46 (2014) . Based on its opinion in Jackson , the Cou rt of Appeals concluded that the stop of the defendant in this companion case, Curtis Mario Benton, was also not supported by reasonable suspicion. State v. Benton , ___ N.C. App. ___, 762 S.E.2d 1 , 2014 WL 2507700, at *1S TATE V
. B ENTON Opinion of the Court

- 2

- (2014) (unpublished)

. On appeal to this Court, we concluded that the stop of defendant Jackson was sup ported by reasonable suspicion , and we therefore reversed the decision of Court of Appeals. State v. Jackson , ___ N.C. ___, ___ , ___ S.E.2d ___ ,

___ ( June 11, 2015) (183A14)

. According ly, the decision of the Court of Appeals in State v. Benton , ___ N.C. App. ___, 762 S.E.2d 1 (2014) is vacated and remand ed to that court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in State v. Jackson , ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d

___ (2015).

VACATED AND R EMANDED.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 66 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning the 

humanitarian crisis in Gaza. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2009 

Mr. KUCINICH (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. 

KAPTUR, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. RAHALL, Ms. WATSON, and Ms. WOOLSEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 

concerning the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. 

Whereas over 95 percent of the deaths incurred since the escalation of violence in Gaza beginning December 27, 

2008, have been Palestinians; 

Whereas over 50 percent of the population of Gaza is under 

the age of 14; 

Whereas on January 7, 2009, the United Nations found that 

over one-third of the Palestinians killed in Gaza were civilians, while over 1,300 of the injured are children; 

Whereas on January 6, 2009, 40 civilians were killed and 55 

civilians were injured when the Israeli Defense Forces 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 66 IH 

(IDF) bombed two United Nations facilities, including a 

school, where Palestinians were seeking shelter; 

Whereas nearly the entire population of Gaza has no access 

to potable water or functioning water systems, and sewage and wastewater systems have seized due to lack of 

water and electricity, causing sewage overflows in some 

residential neighborhoods, creating a public health crisis, 

according to the World Bank; 

Whereas reports indicate that since the beginning of the 

Israeli imposed blockade in February 2006, approximately 200 Palestinians in Gaza have died due to lack 

of access to medical goods and aid; 

Whereas on January 7 and 8, 2009, the International Committee of the Red Cross found a total of up to 65 bodies 

in two separate locations, both of which included a number of emaciated children, in houses bombed in the south 

of Gaza after four days of lack of ambulance access; 

Whereas the United Nations Relief and Works Agency and 

the International Committee of the Red Cross were temporarily forced to halt all aid shipments, following the 

death of two United Nations aid truck drivers; and 

Whereas Articles 55 and 56 of the 4th Geneva Convention require ‘‘ensuring the food and medical supplies of the population’’ and ‘‘ensuring and maintaining . . . the medical 

and hospital establishments and services, public health 

and hygiene’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls on 

2 the Government of Israel and representatives of Hamas 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 66 IH 

1 to implement an immediate and unconditional ceasefire 

2 and to allow unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Douglas Haig, 

Defendant. 

No. 18-00105MJ 

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Continue Status 

Hearing (Doc. 9), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED the status hearing presently set for February 15, 2018 is reset to 

March 15, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns, Sandra Day 

O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003, 

Courtroom 303. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)______ will commence on _______for a total of ______days. 

 Dated this 13th day of February, 2018. 

Case 2:18-mj-00105-MHB Document 10 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 1
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant, v. William L. PATRICK, Respondent.

No. 92-SC-476-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Dec. 17, 1992.

Barbara S. Rea, Kentucky Bar Ass’n, Frankfort, for movant.

Julius Rather, Lexington, for respondent.

ORDER

The Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association determined that the respondent, William L. Patrick, engaged in professional misconduct by committing a criminal act which reflected adversely on his fitness as a lawyer in violation of SCR 3.130-8.3(b). The Board recommended a one-year suspension from the practice of law.

The respondent was arrested in Fayette County, Kentucky on April 13, 1991 for driving under the influence of intoxicants. At the time of his arrest he was in possession of a quantity of cocaine and was subsequently indicted for possession of a Schedule II narcotic, a Class D felony. Respondent plead guilty to the D.U.I. charge and was ordered to pay fines and service fees amounting to $350.00 plus court costs. As to the charge of cocaine possession, he plead guilty to an amended charge of possession of a schedule II non-narcotic, a Class A misdemeanor. He was conditionally discharged for a period of two years, served a thirty day jail sentence in the Fayette County detention center and satisfactorily performed two-hundred hours of community service.

On October 16, 1991, the Inquiry Tribunal of the Kentucky Bar Association issued a two count charge against respondent alleging that his criminal conduct, as set forth above, was professional misconduct of the type prohibited by SCR 3.130-8.3(b). The Board of Governors reviewed the record and heard oral argument. By a vote of 16 to 1, the Board found that respondent’s DUI conviction did not adversely reflect on his fitness as a lawyer and dismissed the charge. The Board unanimously agreed, however, that respondent’s controlled substance conviction did adversely reflect on his fitness as a lawyer, and amounted to a violation of SCR 3.130-8.3(b). A majority of the Board recommended a one-year suspension.

Pursuant to SCR 3.370(9), this Court adopts the decision and recommendation of the Board of Governors as to all matters pertaining to the respondent William L. Patrick.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That the respondent, William L. Patrick, be, and he is hereby, suspended from the practice of law in Kentucky for a period of one (1) year. The period of suspension shall commence on February 14, 1992, and continue until such time as he is reinstated to the practice of law by order of this Court pursuant to SCR 3.510.

The respondent is directed to pay the cost of this action.

*869Pursuant to SCR 3.390, the respondent shall, within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order, notify all clients in writing of his inability to represent them and to furnish photostatic copies of said letters of notice to the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association.

All concur.

ENTERED: December 17, 1992.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens

Chief Justice
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:       February 23, 2009               |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                              |   |   |   |
| /s/       G. Richard Smith                   |   |   |   |
| G.      Richard SmithChief      Financial Officer |   |   |   |

----
**Exhibit 31.1****MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION**I, J. Eric Pike, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pike Electric Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         /s/ J. Eric Pike  Date: February 9, 2007 J. Eric Pike   Chairman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President
Case 2:17-mj-07539-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07539-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07539-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07539-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 4 of 4