Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 7, 2017 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-00560-CR No. 05-16-00561-CR No. 05-16-00562-CR No. 05-16-00563-CR MERCEDES M. BIGGURS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-57650-U, F14-70586-U, F14-70971-U, F14-75674-U 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Bridges Appellant Mercedes M. Biggurs appeals her convictions, following the adjudication of her guilt, for aggravated robbery with a dead ly weapon, theft of prope rty valued at $1,500 or more but less than $20,000, and tw o injury to a child offenses . The trial court assessed punishment at two years’ confin ement in state jail for the theft conviction, ten years’ imprisonment for each injury to a child conv iction, and fifteen years’ imprisonment for the aggravated robbery conviction. On appeal, appe llant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presen ts a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573–2– S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders ). Counsel delivered a copy of th e brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v.
State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noti ng appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the reco rd and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explain ing appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 160560F.U05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MERCEDES M. BIGGURS, Appellant
No. 05-16-00560-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F08-57650-U. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Myers and Sc henck participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered December 7, 2017.–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MERCEDES M. BIGGURS, Appellant
No. 05-16-00561-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-70586-U. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Myers and Sc henck participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered December 7, 2017.–5– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MERCEDES M. BIGGURS, Appellant
No. 05-16-00562-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-70971-U. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Myers and Sc henck participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered December 7, 2017.–6– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MERCEDES M. BIGGURS, Appellant
No. 05-16-00563-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-75674-U. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Myers and Sc henck participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered December 7, 2017.