alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6803
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD EDISON BOYD, a/k/a Jake Boyd, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-92-383, CA-95-3774-MJG) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Edison Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Jefferson McClure Gray, OBER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

CORRECTED OPINION23 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Boyd , Nos. CR-92- 383; CA-95-3774-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 70 

Congratulating Anthony Kevin ‘‘Tony’’ Dungy for his accomplishments as 

a coach, father, and exemplary member of his community. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2009 

Mr. BILIRAKIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Anthony Kevin ‘‘Tony’’ Dungy for his accomplishments as a coach, father, and exemplary member 

of his community. 

Whereas Tony Dungy attended the University of Minnesota 

and became the school’s leader in completions, touchdown 

passes and passing yards; 

Whereas Tony Dungy received two ‘‘Most Valuable Player’’ 

awards from the University of Minnesota; 

Whereas Tony Dungy continued his football career in the 

NFL and became a Super Bowl Champion with the 

Pittsburgh Steelers in 1978; 

Whereas Tony Dungy, at the age of 25, became the youngest 

assistant coach, and at the age of 28, became the youngest defensive coordinator in NFL history; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HRES 70 IH 

Whereas Tony Dungy, in 1997, helped lead the Tampa Bay 

Buccaneers to their first winning season since 1982; 

Whereas Tony Dungy was the first African-American head 

coach to win the Super Bowl by leading the Indianapolis 

Colts over the Chicago Bears in 2007; 

Whereas Tony Dungy is the first NFL head coach to defeat 

all 32 NFL teams; 

Whereas Tony Dungy has been a remarkable and upstanding 

member of the communities of which he has been a part; 

Whereas Tony Dungy has been an advocate for the Christian 

faith and a mentor for American youth; 

Whereas Tony Dungy has acted as a public speaker for the 

Fellowship of Christian Athletes and Athletes in Action; 

Whereas Tony Dungy started Mentors for Life, a mentoring 

program for young people and provided participants with 

tickets to Buccaneers’ games; 

Whereas Tony Dungy has supported numerous charitable 

programs and community service organizations and remains actively involved in his communities in Tampa and 

Indianapolis; 

Whereas Tony Dungy was appointed by President George W. 

Bush to the President’s Council on Service and Civil Participation in August of 2007; and 

Whereas Tony Dungy wrote a memoir which reached No. 1 

on the hardcover nonfiction section of the New York 

Times Best Seller list on August 5, 2007, and again on 

September 9, 2007: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HRES 70 IH 

1 (1) congratulates Tony Dungy on his successful 

2 playing and coaching career and historic coaching 

3 accomplishments; and 

4 (2) commends Tony Dungy for his compassion, 

5 integrity, and commitment to his faith, family, and 

6 community. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Roy WHITE, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 56285.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 20, 1990.

W. Morris Taylor, William K. Meehan, William W. Holland, St. Louis, for appellant.

George R. “Buzz” Westfall, Pros. Atty., Celeste Leritz Endicott, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Louis, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

Driver appeals the trial court’s decision in favor of the Director of Revenue. Driver’s driving privileges were revoked pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo 1986, for refusing to take a breathalyzer test. We affirm.

Driver’s sole point is he did not refuse to submit to a voluntary chemical test. He claims the judgment was against the weight of the evidence. On appeal, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict and must affirm the judgment if it is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. *Oliver v. McNeill,*767 S.W.2d 568, 568-69 (Mo.App.1988).

In a light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence showed driver was involved in a traffic accident and charged with driving while intoxicated and driving on the wrong side of a divided highway. The officer requested driver take a chemical breath test. Driver asked to speak to his lawyer. After speaking with his lawyer, driver agreed to submit to the breathalyzer test. He was told how to give a breath sample. The first time driver was requested to take the test, he held the breath tube approximately 12 to 15 inches away from his mouth and blew a puff of air towards the mouthpiece. On his second “attempt” he did not close his lips around the breath tube. Driver then refused further attempts to take the test.

A refusal to take a chemical test is defined as a “volitional failure to do what is necessary in order that the test can be performed....” *Spralding v. Deimeke,*528 S.W.2d 759, 766 [13] (Mo.1975). It was *862the duty of the trial court to determine if the failure of driver to take the test was due to a refusal or to arbitrary or unreasonable conduct by the police officer. *Id.*The credibility of witnesses was for the trier of fact to evaluate and we must defer to his findings and conclusions. *Oliver,*767 S.W.2d at 569.

Here, there is substantial evidence driver refused to take the breathalyzer test. Driver was told how to take the test and the consequences if he failed to provide a useable sample. While it may be true driver has asthma, the trial court was not bound to accept driver’s unilateral claim he was having an asthma attack at the time of the test. The court obviously believed the police officer’s testimony was more credible. There is sufficient evidence to support such a belief.

Judgment affirmed.

GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant. 

CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC (BPV) 

ORDER 

 

 The Court has reviewed the disclosure made by the Government and previously 

ruled on by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco; 

 The Court finding the redactions were properly made and it has been properly 

disclosed, IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Reconsider Magistrate’s Denial of Motion to 

Compel and to Withdraw Referral Due to Improper Ex Parte Communications (Doc. 145) 

filed by the defendant is DENIED. 

 The Motion for Sanctions Due to Serious Ethical Violations (Doc. 160) filed by the 

defendant is DENIED. 

 The Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Under the Religious 

Freedom Restoration Act (Doc. 129) filed by the defendant is DENIED. 

Dated this 8th day of February, 2019. 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 169 Filed 02/08/19 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Harry D. Dalton, ) Case No. CV-18-08013-PCT-MHB 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) ORDER 

vs. ) 

 ) 

Arizona Living Rental and Property ) 

Management, LLC, Keller William, ) 

Karen Bohler, and Vicki Runyon, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Report (Doc. 39), 

 IT IS ORDERED that, if the parties believe that there exists a reasonable 

prospect of settlement at a settlement conference before another U.S. Magistrate Judge, 

they are directed to file a joint request for a referral, in which they avow that a settlement 

conference would not be a futile exercise, and that they believe there exists a reasonable 

prospect of settlement. The Court will then refer the case for a settlement conference 

before another U.S. Magistrate Judge in this District. 

 Dated this 30th day of April, 2018. 

Case 3:18-cv-08013-MHB Document 46 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13012]




[[Page 25919]]

Pension and Welfare Benefit Administration


Working Group on Protections for Benefit Plan Participants, 
Advisory Council on Employee, Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; 
Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting of the Working Group on Protections for Benefit Plan 
Participants of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension 
Benefit Plans will be held on June 18, 1996, in Room N3437 B&C, U.S. 
Department of Labor Building, Third and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the meeting, which will be held from 1 to 3:30 p.m., 
is to begin taking testimony on protection issues relating to plan 
assets.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topic concerning ERISA by submitting 20 copies on or 
before May 27, 1996 to Sharon Morrissey, Acting Executive Secretary, 
ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5677, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group 
on Protections for Benefit Plan Participants of the Advisory Council 
should forward their request to the Acting Executive Secretary or 
telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 
minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. 
Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should 
contact Sharon Morrissey by May 27 at the address indicated in the 
notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Acting Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at 
the above address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record 
of the meeting if received on or before May 27, 1996.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of May, 1996.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-13012 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned, Yongfei Jiang, the
Chief Financial Officer of SUTOR TECHNOLOGY GROUP LIMITED (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:
 
 1.      The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this statement this 28th day of September, 2010.
 
 /s/ Yongfei JiangYongfei
      JiangChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sutor Technology Group Limited and will be retained by Sutor Technology Group
Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
 
 The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13680]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Review of a Revised 
Information Collection: Forms RI 34-1 and RI 34-3

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management has submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for clearance of a revised information collection: 
Forms RI 34-1 and RI 34-3. RI 34-1, Financial Resources Questionnaire, 
collects detailed financial information for use by OPM in determining 
whether to agree to a waiver, compromise, or adjustment of the 
collection of erroneous payments from the Civil Service Retirement and 
Disability Fund. RI 34-3, Notice of Debt Due Because of Annuity 
Overpayment, informs the annuitant that a debt is due, describes the 
cause for the overpayment, and collects information from the annuitant 
regarding payment of the debt.
    Approximately 1,561 RI 34-1 and 520 RI 34-3 forms will be completed 
per year. Each form requires approximately 1 hour to complete. The 
annual burden is 1,561 hours and 520 hours respectively.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f3532393e2d2d30311f323e363371302f3271383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9af0f7fcfbe8e8f5f4daf7fbf3f6b4f5eaf7b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 
1, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--
Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street 
NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415

      and

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management & Budget, New Executive Office Building 
NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 96-13680 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Peter Strojnik, State Bar No. 6464

STROJNIK P.C.

2375 East Camelback Road Suite 600

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone: (602) 524-6602

ADA@strojnik.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fernando Gastelum,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Kuber-Rambdas Investments LLC,

Defendant.

Case No: 2:18-cv-00470-GMS

NOTICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL 

IN COMPANION CASE 

(17-cv-02792-GMS – Gastelum v. 

Canyon Hospitality LLC)

Please take notice that Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Appeal in 17-cv-02792 –

GMS Gastelum v. Canyon Hospitality LLC which is appended hereto as Exhibit 1. 

DATED on the day reflected in the header

STROJNIK, P.C.

Peter Strojnik, 6464

Case 2:18-cv-00470-GMS Document 26 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.1



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, DC 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Ms. Chanda Kochhar, the Managing Director & Chief Executive
Officer, and Mr. Rakesh Jha, Chief Financial Officer of ICICI Bank Limited, each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of ICICI Bank Limited.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 1, 2016



| | By: | /s/ Chanda Kochhar
| | --- | ------------------
| |     | Name:             
| |     | Title:            





| | By: | /s/ Rakesh Jha
| | --- | --------------
| |     | Name:         
| |     | Title:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as anofficer of IHS Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended February 28, 2009 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to such report. A signed original of thisstatement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

Date: March 25, 2009

 
| /s/ Jerre L. Stead                                   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jerre L. Stead                                       |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                 |   |
|                                                 |   |
| /s/ Michael J. Sullivan                              |   |
| Michael J. Sullivan                                  |   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 538 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 538

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 24, 2009.
Whereas Olympic Day, June 23, 2009, celebrated the Olympic ideal of developing 
        peace through sport;
Whereas June 23 marks the anniversary of the founding of the modern Olympic 
        movement, the date on which the Congress of Paris approved the proposal 
        of Pierre de Coubertin to found the modern Olympics;
Whereas for more than 100 years, the Olympic movement has built a more peaceful 
        and better world by educating young people through amateur athletics, by 
        bringing together athletes from many countries in friendly competition, 
        and by forging new relationships bound by friendship, solidarity, and 
        fair play;
Whereas the United States and Chicago, Illinois, advocate the ideals of the 
        Olympic movement;
Whereas hundreds of local governments from across the United States are joining 
        together to show their support for bringing the Olympic Games to 
        Chicago, Illinois, in 2016;
Whereas Olympic Day will encourage the development of Olympic and Paralympic 
        Sport in the United States;
Whereas Olympic Day encourages the participation of youth of the United States 
        in Olympic and Paralympic sport;
Whereas Olympic Day will encourage the teaching of Olympic history, health, 
        arts, and culture among the youth of the United States;
Whereas Olympic Day will encourage the youth of the United States to support the 
        Olympic movement and the selection of Chicago, Illinois, as the host 
        city for the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games; and
Whereas enthusiasm for Olympic and Paralympic sport is at an all-time high: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports Olympic Day and the goals that Olympic Day pursues; and
            (2) encourages the International Olympic Committee to select 
        Chicago, Illinois, as the host city for the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic 
        Games.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```