alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AFC Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended December 25, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

Date: March 8, 2006


                                         /s/ KENNETH L. KEYMER
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Kenneth L. Keymer
                                         Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.86

Annual Cash Compensation for Non-Employee Directors

Effective
August 1, 2009 the annual cash compensation for non-employee directors of Silicon Graphics International Corp. was amended to be as follows:



|                                                        |  |   |       
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------
|Annual Retainer for Board Members:                      |  | $ | 45,000
|                                                        | 
|Annual Retainer for Committee Positions:                |  |   |       
|Audit Committee Chairperson:                            |  | $ | 24,000
|Other Audit Committee members:                          |  | $ | 10,000
|Compensation Committee Chairperson:                     |  | $ | 15,000
|Other Compensation Committee members:                   |  | $ | 8,000 
|Nominating Committee Chairperson:                       |  | $ | 10,000
|Other Nominating Committee members:                     |  | $ | 5,000 
|Strategic Planning Committee Chairperson:               |  | $ | 4,000 
|Other Strategic Planning Committee members:             |  | $ | 2,000 
|Annual Retainer for Non-Employee Chairman of the Board: |  | $ | 25,000

All retainer payments will be paid quarterly in arrears, pro-rated for any partial
quarters served.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29542-29543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14658]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29543]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM96-1-131-000]


KO Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

June 5, 1996.
     Take notice that on May 29, 1996, KO Transmission Company (KO 
Transmission) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet with a proposed 
effective date of June 1, 1996:

First Revised Sheet No. 10

    KO Transmission states that the purpose of the filing is to revise 
its fuel retainage percentage consistent with Section 24 of the General 
Terms and Conditions of its Tariff. According to KO Transmission, 
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) operates and maintains 
the KO Transmission facilities pursuant to the Operating Agreement 
referenced in its tariff at Original Sheet No. 7. Pursuant to that 
Operating Agreement, Columbia retains certain volumes associated with 
gas transported on behalf of KO Transmission. On May 17, 1996, Columbia 
notified KO Transmission of an increase in the percentage of volumes to 
be retained. Accordingly, KO Transmission states that the instant 
filing tracks this increase.
    KO Transmission states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of KO Transmission's jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with section 385.214 and section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14658 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00307-CV

The State of Texas

v.

Stockton Bend 100 Joint Venture, A 

Texas Joint Venture

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law

of Hood County (C05870)

June 9, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant The State of Texas shall pay all of the 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-SC-1785 | January 16, 2019 Page 1 of 3

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), 

this Memorandum Decision shall not be 

regarded as precedent or cited before any 

court except for the purpose of establishing 

the defense of res judicata, collateral 

estoppel, or the law of the case.

APPELLANT PRO SE

James H. Higgason, Jr.

Pendleton, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Curtis T. Hill, Jr.

Attorney General of Indiana

Aaron T. Craft

Deputy Attorney General

Indianapolis, Indiana

I N T H E

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

James H. Higgason, Jr.,

Appellant-Plaintiff,

v.

Indiana Department of 

Correction,

Appellee-Defendant

January 16, 2019

Court of Appeals Case No.

18A-SC-1785

Appeal from the Miami Superior 

Court

The Honorable J. David Grund, 

Judge

Trial Court Cause No.

52D01-1605-SC-317

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

[1] In May 2016, James Higgason Jr. filed a pro se small-claims action against the 

Indiana Department of Correction seeking $533.47 in damages. The small-
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-SC-1785 | January 16, 2019 Page 2 of 3

claims court entered judgment for Higgason in the amount of $8.50. 

Appellant’s App. Vol. II p. 16. Higgason then filed a “Notice of Appeal” in the

trial court, not this Court. Id. at 14; see Ind. Appellate Rule 9(A). More than 

thirty days after the small-claims court’s judgment, Higgason filed a “Belated 

Notice of Appeal” in this Court, arguing that he diligently pursued his appellate 

rights because he timely filed a notice of appeal, just in the wrong court, and 

that as a pro se litigant he should be held to a lesser standard. We denied 

Higgason’s “Belated Notice of Appeal” and dismissed the case with prejudice. 

Higgason filed a transfer petition, which our Supreme Court denied. 

[2] Undeterred, Higgason returned to the trial court and filed a “Petition for 

Permission to File a Belated Notice of Appeal,” which the trial court denied 

because “there is no available remedy herein.” Appellant’s App. Vol. II p. 20. 

Higgason now appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition.

[3] To the extent Higgason argues that this Court should exercise its discretion and 

allow him to file the notice of appeal even though it was late, see In re D.J., 68 

N.E.3d 574 (Ind. 2017); In re O.R., 16 N.E.3d 965 (Ind. 2014), he has already 

made that argument to this Court and lost. And to the extent Higgason argues

that there is another path to this Court and that the trial court erred by not 

allowing him to file a belated notice of appeal, the trial court was correct in 

finding that there is no such mechanism in civil cases. That is, although 

Indiana Post-Conviction Rule 2(1) allows a defendant “convicted after a trial or 

plea of guilty” to petition the trial court for permission to file a belated notice of 

appeal, there is no analog for civil cases. We therefore affirm the trial court.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-SC-1785 | January 16, 2019 Page 3 of 3

[4] Affirmed. 

Mathias, J., and Crone, J., concur.
Presidential Documents

29001

Federal Register

Vol. 61, No. 111

Friday, June 7, 1996

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 96–27 of May 28, 1996

U.S.-Israel Arrow Deployability Program

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the National Defense Authorization

Act for Fiscal Year 1994, Public Law 103–160, I hereby certify that:

—the United States and the Government of Israel have entered into an

agreement governing the conduct and funding of the Arrow Deployability

Program;

—the Arrow Deployability Program will benefit the United States and

has not been barred by other Congressional direction;

—the Arrow missile successfully completed a flight test on June 12, 1994,

in which it intercepted a target missile under realistic test conditions; and

—the Government of Israel is continuing, in accordance with its previous

public commitments, to adhere to export controls pursuant to the Guidelines

and Annex of the Missile Technology Control Regime.

You are authorized and directed to notify the Congress of this determination

and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, May 28, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–14583

Filed 6–6–96; 8:45 am]

Billing code 5000–04–M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 642 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 

legislation relating to changes in our Nation’s health care system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. GRIFFITH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with 

respect to legislation relating to changes in our Nation’s 

health care system. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that if the House of Representatives passes 

3 a health care bill that contains a new Federal Govern4 ment-sponsored health care program that provides services 

5 and coverage, and such bill is signed into law, such pro6 gram should be adopted by the Members of the House of 

7 Representatives as their own personal health insurance 

8 coverage. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAR 07 2000 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

*Honorable William M. Hoeveler, Senior U.S. Di strict Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation. **Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson, III, did not participate in this decision. This decision is rendered by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 97-2428

________________________ D. C. Docket No. 96-00865-CIV-ORL-19 ROSARIO DONATO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________ (March 7, 2000) Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, BLAC K, Circuit Judge, and HOEVELER * , Senior District Judge.** PER CURIAM:2 We affirm the district court's dismissal of Appellant's complaint on the basis of the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court of Florida, Donato v. AT& T Co. , No. SC93534 (Fla. Jan. 20, 2000). AFFIRMED.
#### Raymond R. BROWN, Respondent, v. Carolyn Marie BROWN, Appellant. Raymond R. BROWN, Respondent, v. Carolyn Marie BROWN, Appellant.

Nos. WD 50607, WD 51072.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 16, 1996.

Sherry Danita DeJanes, Kansas City, for appellant.

Lawrence E. Tittle, Independence, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from decree of dissolution.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, ConnieStechman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Ormat Funding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and resultsof operations of Ormat Funding Corp. as of and for the periodspresented in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This written statementis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit accompanying such Quarterly Report and shall not be deemedfiled pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Date:November 10, 2005

|        |  |        |  |                                                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|--------|--|---------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|   |  | By:    |  | /s/CONNIE STECHMAN                                |
|   |  |   |  | Name: ConnieStechmanTitle: Chief FinancialOfficer |
|        |

----
NOTE             Exhibit 10.26

$3,500                                                 Date: October 20, 2000


     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,   Archer  Systems  Limited,   Inc.,  the  undersigned
("Payor"),  hereby  promises  to pay to the order of  Richard J.  Margulies,  an
individual,  ("Holder"), the principal amount of $3,500.00,  payable twenty four
(24) months after the date first set forth above.  The  principal  amount hereof
from time to time  outstanding  shall bear  interest  at the rate of six percent
(6%) per annum,  payable on the date set forth  above.  All  payments  hereunder
shall be in lawful  money of the United  States of America at the address of the
Holder  hereof or at such  address as shall be specified by the Holder to Archer
Systems Limited, Inc.
     If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or principal,  then
the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of its legal rights
to collect  the  balance due unless  within  five (5)  business  days after such
notice the default  shall be cured by Payor.  Such notice  shall be deemed given
three (3) days after having been  deposited in the United  States Mail  properly
addressed  and  sent by  registered  mail to the  particular  addressee,  return
receipt requested.

     Prepayments may be made in this note  voluntarily at any time and from time
to time, without penalty.



                                                 Archer Systems Limited, Inc.

                                                 BY:/s/Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                 --------------------------
                                                       Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                       Secretary/Treasurer



                                        4
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Each of the undersigned officers of American CareSource Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies that:

 

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   |         |   |   |                                                                |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | May 15, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Wayne A. Schellhammer                                           |
|   |         |   |   | Wayne A. Schellhammer

Chief Executive Officer                      |
|   |         |   |   |                                                                |
| Date:  | May 15, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ David S. Boone                                                  |
|   |         |   |   | David S. Boone

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |         |   |   |                                                                |
| Date:  | May 15, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Steven M. Phillips                                              |
|   |         |   |   | Steven M. Phillips

Controller and Principal

Accounting Officer    |
|   |         |   |   |                                                                |

 

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 3/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9APPEAL 9CRIMINAL

9NON-APPEAL 9CIVIL

9CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (6SHFLI\)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

3') HPDLO

$6&,, HPDLO

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025( 7+$1 21( )250$7, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Ryan Devereaux 9703087323 5/22/2018

The Intercept

114 5th Avenue 18th floor New York NY 10011

4:18-mj-01455-N/A-BPV Assigned to: Chief Jud 5/11/2018

USA v. Warren Tucson Arizona

✔

✔

✔

✔

5/11/2018

5/11/2018

✔ 5/11/2018

5/11/2018

31.00

✔

✔

Ryan Devereaux

5/22/2018

✔

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 75 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 1
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 561 

Congratulating the Onondaga Community College Lady Lazers for winning 

the National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) Division I 

Women’s Lacrosse Tournament. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2009 

Mr. MAFFEI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Onondaga Community College Lady 

Lazers for winning the National Junior College Athletic 

Association (NJCAA) Division I Women’s Lacrosse 

Tournament. 

Whereas, on May 10, 2009, the Onondaga Community College Lady Lazers defeated Monroe Community College 9– 

7 in the finals of the National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) Division I Women’s Lacrosse Tournament at Herkimer County Community College; 

Whereas the Lady Lazers won the national title in their first 

year of existence; 

Whereas the Lady Lazers’ players, coaches, and staff are excellent representatives of Onondaga Community College; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 561 IH 

Whereas Lauren Welch, Amanda Cizenski, and Emily Pierson 

were named 1st Team NJCAA All-Americans; and 

Whereas the residents of Onondaga County and fans are to 

be congratulated for their support, dedication, and pride 

in the team: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the Onondaga Community College Lady Lazers 

3 for winning the National Junior College Athletic Associa4 tion (NJCAA) Division I Women’s Lacrosse Tournament. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 29001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14583]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 111 / Friday, June 7, 1996 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 29001]]

                Presidential Determination No. 96-27 of May 28, 1996

                
U.S.-Israel Arrow Deployability Program

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the National 
                Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, Public 
                Law 103-160, I hereby certify that:

                    --the United States and the Government of Israel 
                have entered into an agreement governing the conduct 
                and funding of the Arrow Deployability Program;
                    --the Arrow Deployability Program will benefit the 
                United States and has not been barred by other 
                Congressional direction;
                    --the Arrow missile successfully completed a flight 
                test on June 12, 1994, in which it intercepted a target 
                missile under realistic test conditions; and
                    --the Government of Israel is continuing, in 
                accordance with its previous public commitments, to 
                adhere to export controls pursuant to the Guidelines 
                and Annex of the Missile Technology Control Regime.

                You are authorized and directed to notify the Congress 
                of this determination and to publish it in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 28, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96-14583
Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
Billing code 5000-04-M