### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT NAS HVILLE Fe br ua ry 14, 200 6 S es sio n STATE OF TENNESS EE v . MARK A. SCHIE FELBE IN

Circuit Court

for Will iam son Coun ty No. I-1102-427

No. M2005- 00166-CCA -R3-C D - F iled March 7, 2007

AMENDED JUD GM ENT Ca me th e d e f

e n d a n t, M ark A

. Sc h ie f

e lb e in , th r o u g h c o u n s e l, a n d th e St ate of Tenne ssee, throug h the attorne y g ener al, upon the def

endant’ s appea l from the judg ments of the Wil liamson C o u n t y C ircuit Court, where a jury convicted the defe ndant of seve n counts of aggr av at ed sexual battery and one c ount of espec ially ag g ravated sexual ex ploitation of a minor. Following extensive briefing , oral a rg ument, and our r eview of the re cord a nd the applica ble law, we modify

the i m p osition of consecutive se ntence s but otherwise a ffirm the c onvictions and se nte nc e s. For the sake of cla rity , we e x press the f

ollowing c hart for

equating the dual nu mbe ri ng of

the va ri ou s c ou nts : Cou nt N umb e r i n Ind ic tme nt andon Eq uiv a le nt C ou nt N umb e rs Us e d in J udg ments (count number s used Bill of Particula rs, State Elec tion of here in for modification of judgme nts Counts, and the Court’s Opinion

______________________________ ____________________________

2 1 4 2 6 3 7 4 8 5 9 6 10 7 11 8. (This judg ment adjudicate s the defe ndant ’ s d ire c t a p p eal f rom trial court case number I -1102-427; the issues in a c onsolidated but separ ate Te nnessee R ule of Appe llate Proce dure 10-2-

appea l, number M2005-02370-CCA-R10-CO, a re a djudicated in a

separ ate judg ment bearing that case ’s appe llate docke t number.)

I t is, therefor e, ORDERED a nd ADJUDGED that the trial c ourt’s judg ments be MO DIF I ED a s f

oll ow s: (1 ) T he se nte nc e s f

or ind ic tme nt/

jud g me nt c ou nts 2, 7, 8, a nd 9 s ha ll b e imp os e d to run conc urre ntly

with eac h other a nd concur rently with the sentenc e in count 4; (2) The sentenc es for

indictment/

j u d gm en t counts 4, 6, 10 and 11 shall run consec utively

to eac h other; and (3) The judgme nt in count 11 shall be amended to re flec t that the conviction is based upon Tenne ssee Code A nnotated sec tion 39-17-1005 (not section 39-17-105, as stated in the orig inal judgme nt). I t is fu rthe r O RD ERE D a ndAD JUDG ED that, i n a ll o the r r e sp e c ts, the jud g me nts of the trial c ourt are AFF I RMED.

I t is further ORDERED that the judg e who pr esided ove r the trial is disqualified fr om conducting further

proce eding s in this cause. Further, it is ORDERED that the cause be REMAND ED to the t ri al co u rt for the mod if ic a ton of jud g me nts a s h e re in o rd e re d, the e xec uti on of jud g me nts , a nd the c oll e c tio n o f c os ts below. Th e c os ts of the a pp e a l ar e ta xed on e -h a lf (1⁄2 ) to the Sta te of Te nn e sse e a ndon e -h a lf ( 1⁄2) t o t h e d e f

e n d a n t , f o r w h i c h e x e c u t i o n m a y i s s u e i f n e c e s s ar y. This amended judg ment shall replac e the original j u d g me n t f il e d o nF e bruary

8, 2007. Upon the entry

of this amended judg ment in lieu of the orig inal j u d gm en t wh ich is vacated, the parties’ time for filing a Te nnessee Rule of Appellate Procedur e 11 application shall commence anew .

PER C URI AM (Witt , Wedemey er, JJ ., W ad e, P

. J

. , n o tp ar t i ci p at i n g)