alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Monique Portillo, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Philip Brailsford, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00178-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

On January 16, 2019 Defendant Brailsford filed a Partial Joinder in City of Mesa 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. As of this date, no 

responsive memorandum has been filed. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(i) provides in 

part “if the unrepresented party or counsel does not serve and file the required answering 

memorandum, . . . such noncompliance may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting 

of the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.” Pursuant to this rule, 

the Court deems Plaintiff’s failure to serve and file the required answering memorandum a 

consent to the granting of the Defendant Brailsford’s Partial Joinder in City of Mesa 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. 

 IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant Brailsford’s Partial Joinder in City of Mesa 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 53) 

. . . 

. . . 

. . . 

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 60 Filed 02/01/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Defendant Philip Brailsford only. 

 Dated this 1st day of February, 2019. 

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 60 Filed 02/01/19 Page 2 of 2
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30565

Summary Calendar

 

LARRY TRIGGS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-2430-K

 

May 23, 2000

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Triggs, Louisiana inmate #66331, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred

by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. §

2244(d). Triggs contends that the district court erred in

determining that his state application for post-conviction relief

was not “properly filed” as that term is used in § 2244(d)(2).

This Court’s opinion in Smith v. Ward, ___ F.3d ___, 2000 WL
2

358294 at *2-3 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2000), indicates that Triggs’

state application for post-conviction relief was “properly filed”

for purposes of § 2244(d) and should have tolled the § 2244(d)

limitations period. Accordingly, the judgment dismissing Triggs’

§ 2254 application as time-barred is VACATED, and the case is

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

VACATED and REMANDED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15053]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: Environmental Health Sciences Review 
Committee.
    Date: July 29-30, 1996.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
Building 101, Conference Rooms A and B, South Campus, Research 
Triangle Park, North Carolina.
    Contact Person: Dr. Ethel Jackson, Scientific Review 
Administrator, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 
(919) 541-7826.
    Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Estimation; 
93.894, Research and Manpower Development, National Institutes of 
Health)

    Dated: June 10, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-15053 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 F 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

. 25 

26 

27 

28 

\ 

__ FILED __ LODGED 

-,=;==;::..;.R.:.=EC::.::E:..:.:IVE:.::.D--==~C:'..'.::OPY 

NOV 2 O 2019 

CLERK US DISTRICT COURT 

BY ~ , DISTRICT OF ARIZONA . · · DEPUTY 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United Stat~s of America, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00223-TUC-RCC(DTF) 

VERDICT 

, 

We the jury, find the Defendant, Scott Daniel Warren, NOT Gi ui I T'-I . I 

of Harboring Illegal Alien Jose Arnaldo Sacaria-Goday as charged in the Indictment. 

Foreperson's Juror Number Date
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pike Electric Corporation2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Mark CastanedaDate:
November 14, 2005
    
    Mark CastanedaChief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3594

___________________________

Xiaoyong An O'Neal

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security; SSA Office of

1

General Counsel

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau

____________

 Submitted: June 29, 2017

Filed: July 6, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Nancy A. Berryhill has been appointed to serve as Acting Commissioner of 1

Social Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).
Xiaoyong An O’Neal appeals an order of the district court affirming the

2

Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income (SSI) following a hearing

before an administrative law judge (ALJ). O’Neal argues that the ALJ erred in

determining that she is financially ineligible to receive SSI benefits because she is a

single individual with “countable resources” in excess of the statutory $2,000 limit. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1201. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, this court affirms.

Following de novo review, this court finds no legal error and concludes that

substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s determination. See

Draper v. Colvin, 779 F.3d 556, 559 (8th Cir. 2015). 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the

2

Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable John M. Bodenhausen, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-
Remington Partners, Inc


Exhibit 10.4




Remington Partners, Inc.

Trade Finance and Management

919 Sir Francis Drake Blvd. Suite 202

Kentfield, CA. 94904

Tel: 415-482-6625

Fax: 415-482-6590




Mark S. Litwin, President

Direct Line: 415-482-6561







Participation Certificate







This is to confirm that you are participating with Remington Partners, Inc. (Remington) in a loan made by Remington to Lamplighter Studios, Inc, a California corporation (Lamplighter). The salient features of the participation with Lamplighter are as follows:




1. The loan amount of this date is $150,000, and may be expanded at Remington’s discretion.  The loan agreement is dated January 9, 2009, was funded on                           , 2009 and is revolving and open ended, as against accepted receivables. The loan is documented in Remington’s name. Remington has taken a security interest on all of the company’s assets.




2. The note interest rate is 18% per annum and the rate paid to you is 14% per annum, with interest payable monthly as collected.  

3. Your contribution to the total loan is $25,000.  

4. This Participation will be secured by a security interest granted to one of one of the participants, in the account of Lamplighter, on behalf of all of the participants. A UCC filing on the Remington account of Lamplighter will cover this.







Remington hereby declares that it holds the Lamplighter account, for the benefit of itself and the Participants in proportion to the respective interests as set out above.




Remington declares and agrees that any receipt of cash will be received for and will be distributed to the Participants proratably as received.











As a Participant you agree that you shall be individually responsible for any and all Federal and State income taxes attributable to distributions. Similarly, you will bear your share of any losses should any occur, in proportion to your prorata share of the loan, and reimburse Remington for your prorata share of any out of pocket expenses (including any litigation costs) incurred in connection with the collection of the obligation of Lamplighter, should any be necessary.




Remington will utilize its best effort to service and collect the loan, but is not a surety or guarantor to you. Our relationship is that of co-participants. You also acknowledge that Remington has not made representations to you about the debtor or its financial condition, that your knowledge of those matters has been obtained from your own sources, and that you have made your own decision about the advisability of entering into this participation




This Participation Certificate is issued to Gordon Landies







Dated: as of January      , 2009




Remington Partners, Inc.







				
	By

	 

	 
	Mark S. Litwin


	 
	President


	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and agreed to:


	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Address:


	 
	 

	 

	 
	 

	 

	 
	 

	Social Security No.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|                    |        |                         |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn |
| Name:              |   | Arthur H. Penn          |
| Title:             |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:              |   | February 9, 2022        |

 

 

----
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Everardo Cruz-Castillo, 

Defendant.

No. CR-18-0236-PHX-DGC

DETENTION ORDER 

 In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of 

detention was addressed at a hearing on February 22, 2018. The Court was informed that 

the defendant is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time. 

 The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to 

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such 

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to 

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The 

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court 

proceeding. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of 

this detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion 

for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third 

party custodian. 

 Dated this 23rd day of February, 2018.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14685]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than June 25, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Jefferson V.A. Haynes, Alpine, Texas; to acquire an additional 
8.04 percent, for a total of 21.37 percent, of the voting shares of 
First Alpine, Inc., Alpine, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire First 
National Bank in Alpine, Alpine, Texas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Andrew J. Rossi, Sr., A. Rossi, Inc., Augostino J. Rossi, Albert 
J. Rossi, Andrew J. Rossi, Jr., Kathryn Rossi, Toinnette Rossi, all of 
Manteca, California, and Valerie Rossi Salas, Modesto, California, all 
acting in concert; to retain a total of 25.10 percent of the voting 
shares of Delta National Bancorp, Manteca, California, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Delta National Bank, Manteca, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 5, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-14685 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14195]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-243-001]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 29, 1996, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet proposed 
to be effective June 1, 1996:

Substitute Ninth Revised Sheet No. 52

    Northern states that this filing is being made to correct the GSR 
Surcharge component applicable to TI volumes for the months of April-
October on Sheet No. 52.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestant a party to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14195 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-7   Filed 06/05/18   Page 1 of 6

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-7   Filed 06/05/18   Page 2 of 6

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-7   Filed 06/05/18   Page 3 of 6

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-7   Filed 06/05/18   Page 4 of 6

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-7   Filed 06/05/18   Page 5 of 6

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL   Document 26-7   Filed 06/05/18   Page 6 of 6
United States 

PLAINTIFF 

V. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

'RICT OF ARIZONA 

___ FILED ___ LODGED 

-7""....:.:,:RE~CE:::,:IVE:.:;:D~===~CO~PY 

W,ITNESS LIST 

MAY 1 J 2019 

Scott Daniel Warren 

PRESIDING JUDGE c O 11 in 5 couRTROOM DEPUTY Sherry Gammon COURT REPORTER Erica McQuillen 

HEARING/TRIAL DATE (s) May 13, 2019 PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY (s) Anna Wright, DEFENDANT ATTORNEY (s) Greg Kuykendall, 

Nathaniel Walters Amy Knight 

-

PLF DFT DATE SWORN DATE APPEARED WITNESSES Under 

Rule 

,/ sl 1.~I ,ei 5/ 1-3! 19 Dr. Robin Reineke 

/. 5 /I~\ Ill 5/,g) JCj Maryada Vallet
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael G. Shook, Chief Executive Officer of Consonus Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in connection
with the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

September 5, 2008

By:

/s/MICHAEL G. SHOOKMichael G. Shook
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 65-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

THE SATANIC TEMPLE 

We sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your 

power of attorney. 

Sincerely, 

gel'A0144t AR0e144t 

Director, Exempt OrganizatithiiRulings and Agreements 

Letter 947 

Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 65-1 Filed 10/18/19 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

Inconnection withthisReport on Form10-Qforthe three and nine monthsended June 30, 2019(the “Report”)ofPennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”),asfiled withthe SecuritiesandExchange Commissiononthe datehereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplieswiththe requirementsof Section13(a)or15(d)ofthe SecuritiesExchange Act of1934, as amended;and

 

(2)  The informationcontainedinthe Report fairlypresents, inall material respects, the financial conditionandresultsof operationsoftheRegistrant.

 

| /s/ Aviv Efrat |
|----------------|
| Name:          |   | Aviv Efrat |
| Title:         |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:          |   | August 7, 2019 |