alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                        13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, Cery B. Perle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Newport International
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the small business issuer and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the year in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 31, 2005                   /s/ Cery B. Perle
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Cery B. Perle
                                        Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      OF LARRY POWALISZ**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Legends Business Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      July 21, 2008





/s/
                Larry PowaliszLarry
                Powalisz
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 97-6306. Walter HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. Joe S. HOPPER, Commissioner of Alabama Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee. April 17, 1997. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. (No. 97-T-476-N), Myron H. Thompson, Chief Judge. Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and COX and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Appellant Walter Hill, an Alabama inmate convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death, challenges on appeal the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 assault upon the constitutionality of electrocution as a means of execution. The State of Alabama intends to execute Hill by means of electrocution on May 2, 1997. On March 31, 1997, Appellant Hill filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama charging that the scheduled electrocution constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Among other relief, the complaint sought to enjoin Appellee Joe S. Hopper from employing electrocution to carry out Hill's death sentence. By order dated April 10, 1997, the district court dismissed the complaint as an improper successive habeas petition. We affirm.
In Felker v. Turpin, 101 F.3d 95, 96 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 450, 136 L.Ed.2d 345 (1996), weheld that a prisoner may not circumvent the rules regarding second or successive habeas petitions by filing a § 1983 claim. Appellant Hill acknowledges that he has filed a previous federal habeas petition. See Hill v. Jones, 81 F.3d 1015 (11th Cir.), reh'g and suggestion for reh'g en banc denied, 92 F.3d 1202 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 967, 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997). As Hill's § 1983 cruel and unusual punishment claim constitutes the "functional equivalent" of a second habeas petition, the district court was subject to the law applicable to successive habeas petitions. Felker, 101 F.3d at 96. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Appellant Hill's request for relief because Hill had not applied to this Court for permission to file a second habeas petition.
AFFIRMED.
Edward C. Lee, CPA


November 28, 2000


Mr. Kenneth Kang Yeh, CEO/President


DIT Ventures, Inc.


9420 Telstar Avenue, Suite 211


El Monte, CA 91731


Re: Filing of Form 10-SB


Dear Mr. Yeh:


We have audited the financial statements of DIT Ventures, Inc. (DITV) for the period June 1, 2000 (date of incorporation)
through September 30, 2000. We hereby grant our consent for DITV to include our audit report (dated October 27, 2000) in
DITV's filing of Form 10-SB.


Very truly yours,


Edward C. Lee, CPA


El Monte, California
EMPLOYMENT AND FEE AGREEMENT

     THIS  AGREEMENT  made this 27th day of September,  2000, by and between OAK
TREE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. (hereinafter "CLIENT") with a mailing address of 2797
Ocean  Parkway,  Brooklyn,  NY 11235 and telephone  number of (718) 769-6042 and
RICHARD P. GREENE, P.A., (hereinafter ATTORNEY).

         1.  CLIENT  retains  ATTORNEY  to  represent  CLIENT as Attorney at Law
regarding  Corporate/Securities  related  matters and  authorizes  and  empowers
ATTORNEY  to do all  things  reasonably  necessary  to  complete  corporate  and
securities  transactions  with CLIENT'S  consent (other than in connection  with
capital  raising  transactions)  and agrees to retain  attorney for the services
rendered on the following terms and conditions:

         a.     On the basis of the time expended by ATTORNEY,  a retainer shall
                consist  of 10,000  shares of common  stock of Oak Tree  Medical
                Systems, Inc. All referenced shares shall be registered pursuant
                to a Registration Statement on Form S-8.

         b.     CLIENT shall also be responsible  for costs incurred  including,
                but not limited  to, long  distance  phone  calls,  transcripts,
                photocopies,  postage,  filing  fees,  and  costs  of  newspaper
                publications.  Advanced  costs that are not expended  during the
                course of the representation are to be returned to the client at
                the conclusion of the representation, unless ATTORNEY and CLIENT
                agree otherwise in writing.

         2.  ATTORNEY will render a final  statement  for services  rendered and
costs incurred.  If CLIENT  disagrees with any charge for fees or costs,  CLIENT
must notify  ATTORNEY in writing within ten (10) days after the date of mailing.
Otherwise,  all charges are agreed by CLIENT to be approved  and  accepted.  All
bills are due when rendered.

         3. CLIENT  understands  and agrees that  ATTORNEY has made no guarantee
regarding  the  successful  outcome or  termination  of the  engagement  and all
expressions pertaining thereto are matters of opinion. Should it be necessary to
institute  legal  proceedings  for the  collection of any part of the ATTORNEY'S
compensation  or costs as set forth above,  then CLIENT  agrees to pay all court
costs and reasonable attorneys fees with regard to the collection of same.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Agreement the date
first mentioned above.

ACCEPTED:

Richard P. Greene, P.A.                     Oak Tree Medical Systems, Inc.
By:/s/ Richard P. Greene                   By:  /s/ Simon Boltuch
     ------------------------------         -----------------------------------
     ATTORNEY                                        Simon Boltuch, CEO
EXHIBIT 21--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
SUN COMMUNITY BANCORP LIMITED
DECEMBER 31, 1999

                                                                 State or Other
                                                                  Jurisdiction
Name of Subsidiary                                              of Incorporation
------------------                                              ----------------
Consolidated Subsidiaries:

Bank of Tucson
  (100% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                    Arizona

Valley First Community Bank
  (52% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                     Arizona

Camelback Community Bank
  (55% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                     Arizona

East Valley Community Bank
  (88% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                     Arizona

Southern Arizona Community Bank
  (51% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                     Arizona

Mesa Bank
  (53% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                     Arizona

Nevada Community Bancorp Limited
  (51% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                     Nevada

    Desert Community Bank
      (51% owned by Nevada Community Bancorp Limited)              Nevada

    Red Rock Community Bank
      (51% owned by Nevada Community Bancorp Limited)              Nevada

Sunrise Capital Corporation
  (57% owned by Sun Community Bancorp Limited)                     New Mexico

    Sunrise Bank of Arizona
      (100% owned by Sunrise Capital Corporation)                  Arizona

The  following  summarizes   regulatory  agencies  of  the  registrant  and  its
subsidiaries:

Bank subsidiaries  located in the states Arizona and Nevada are  state-chartered
and are  regulated  by banking  agencies  of each of those  states.  Each of the
banking subsidiaries,  as federally-insured  depository  institutions,  are also
regulated  by the  Federal  Deposit  Insurance  Corporation.  As a bank  holding
company,  Sun  Community  Bancorp  Limited is regulated  by the Federal  Reserve
Board,  which also  regulates  its  nonbanking  subsidiaries.  Nevada  Community
Bancorp  Limited and  Sunrise  Capital  Corporation  are also  regulated  by the
Federal  Reserve  Board.  In  addition  to the  bank  regulatory  agencies,  the
registrant  and its  subsidiaries  are subject to  regulation by other state and
federal agencies.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 39 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 39

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 21, 2009.
Whereas America's Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their 
        academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior 
        scholastic education;
Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the 
        lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values 
        in America's young people;
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 2007-2008 academic 
        year was nearly 2,300,000 and the student-teacher ratio was 14 to 1;
Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students;
Whereas more than 25 percent of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are 
        from minority backgrounds, and over 14 percent are non-Catholics;
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, 
        values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually 
        stimulating environment rich in spiritual, character, and moral 
        development;
Whereas the Catholic high school graduation rate is 99 percent, with 80 percent 
        of graduates attending four-year colleges and 17 percent attending two-
        year colleges or technical schools;
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic education, the National 
        Conference of Catholic Bishops stated: ``Education is one of the most 
        important ways by which the Church fulfills its commitment to the 
        dignity of the person and building of community. Community is central to 
        education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently 
        desired goal. The educational efforts of the Church, therefore, must be 
        directed to forming persons-in-community; for the education of the 
        individual Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, but 
        also the destinies of the many communities in which he lives.''; and
Whereas January 25, 2009, to January 31, 2009, has been designated as Catholic 
        Schools Week by the National Catholic Educational Association and the 
        United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an event co-
        sponsored by the National Catholic Educational Association and the 
        United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and established to 
        recognize the vital contributions of America's thousands of Catholic 
        elementary and secondary schools; and
            (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers 
        across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education, and for 
        the key role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger 
        future for this Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroGrow International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, H. MacGregor Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.





Date:  November 10, 2010
By:
/s/ H. MacGregor ClarkeH. MacGregor ClarkeChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### G. W. Goodwin, Respondent, v. The Kansas City, Fort Scott and Memphis Railroad Company, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

January 27, 1891.

Railroads: killing of stock. Evidence, which fails to disclose the character of the land where the stock came upon the railroad, or where such stock was killed, is insufficient to sustain a statutory action based upon the obligation of the railway company to fence its road.

*Appeal from the Oregon Circuit Court.*— Hon. James Orchard, Special Judge.

Reversed and remanded.

*B. F.*Olden, for appellant.

Without proof showing that, at the point where the animal got upon the track, the railroad ran through uninclosed lands and was not fenced, there is no liability-fixed on defendant, and plaintiff .cannot recover. *Manee v.*Railroad, 79 Mo. 196; *Jantzen v. Railrdad,*83 Mo. 171 ; *Wilson v.*Railroad-, 18 Mo. App. 258*Pearson v.*Railroad, 33 Mo. App. 543. „

*J. II.*Tribble, for respondent.

Biggs, J.

The plaintiff brought suit under section 2611 of the Revised Statutes, 1889, .to recover double damages for the killing of a cow by the defendant’s cars.

It was alleged that the animal was killed by the defendant’s engine or cars at a point where its road ran through uninclosed lands. The defendant at the close of the plaintiff ’ s case offered an instruction in the nature, of a demurrer to the evidence, which the court refused *360to give. The finding and judgment were for the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.

The attention of the court was called in the motion for a new trial to its adverse ruling on the demurrer to the evidence, and the defendant has assigned it for error in this court. We have examined the record and fail to find any testimony as to the character of the land where the animal came on the track or was killed ; whether it was inclosed or uninclosed lands nowhere appears either directly or inferentially. In this respect the plaintiff’s proof fell short; of the requirements of the law. Before the plaintiff was entitled to recover double damages, it devolved upon him to introduce evidence having some tendency to prove that his animal came upon the track, where the defendant was bound by law to fence its right of way. For this reason the demurrer to the evidence' ought to have been sustained. The points argued in the defendant’s brief have been decided adversely to it in *Kinion v.*Railroad, 39 Mo. App. 382.

The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. All the judges concurring, it is so ordered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Bioengineering of Neuroscience, Vision and Low Vision Technologies Study Section, June 16, 2021, 8:00 a.m. to June 17, 2021, 07:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the **Federal Register** on June 08, 2021, 86 FR 30466.

This notice is being amended to change the meeting start time from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 9, 2021.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-12413 Filed 6-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Game Trading Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd
Hays, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
            The Report fully complies with
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




2.
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.




Date:  
      June 2, 2010
              /s/ Todd HaysTodd
      HaysChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit
13.1



Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, DC 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:



The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31,
2018 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Mr.
Sandeep Bakhshi, the Chief Operating Officer (Designate), Mr. Sandeep Batra, President and Mr. Rakesh Jha, Chief Financial Officer
of ICICI Bank Limited, each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report
                                         fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information
                                         contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and results of operations of ICICI Bank Limited.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
July 31, 2018





| | By: | /s/ Sandeep Bakhshi
| | --- | -------------------
| |     | Name:              
| |     | Title:             





| | By: | /s/
    Sandeep Batra
| | --- | ---------------------
| |     | Name:                
| |     | Title:               





| | By: | /s/ Rakesh Jha
| | --- | --------------
| |     | Name:         
| |     | Title: