alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 103 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 636 

[Report No. 111–242] 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives 

all information in the Attorney General’s possession relating to the transfer or release of detainees held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, into the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2009 

Mr. WOLF submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 31, 2009 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, referred to the 

House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House 

of Representatives all information in the Attorney General’s possession relating to the transfer or release of 

detainees held at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

into the United States. 

1 Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to 

2 transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 

3 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 636 RH 

1 copies of any document, memo, or correspondance of the 

2 Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of 

3 Investigations and United States Marshal Service, or any 

4 portion of any such document, memo, or correspondance, 

5 that refers or relates to— 

6 (1) any guidance, recommendations, or 

7 logistical preparations made since January 20, 2009, 

8 for the transfer or release of the detainees held at 

9 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the 

10 United States; 

11 (2) the identities of any detainees that have 

12 been cleared for release into the United States and 

13 as any information about the capture, detention, and 

14 threat assessment of such detainees; 

15 (3) the countries that have been contacted by 

16 Government officials to request their acceptance of 

17 detainees currently held at Naval Station, Guanta18 namo Bay, Cuba; and 

19 (4) the legal guidance regarding the transfer, 

20 detention or release of detainees held at Naval Sta21 tion, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the United 

22 States. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 103 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 636 

[Report No. 111–242] 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the 

States. Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the United transfer or release of detainees held at Naval Attorney General’s possession relating to the House of Representatives all information in the 

JULY 31, 2009 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, 

printed referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William B. STURGEON, Appellant.

No. WD 40439.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 31, 1989.

Joseph H. Locascio, Sp. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and TURNAGE and COVINGTON, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

From convictions of two counts of murder first degree, one count of first degree assault and three counts armed criminal action, the appellant alleges error in his not being able to argue an adverse inference from the state’s not introducing his prior statements and limitation of his closing argument.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 30.-25(b).
**Exhibit        10.40**

**I.C.        ISAACS & COMPANY,        INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =        "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />**

**OMNIBUS        STOCK        PLAN**

**NONSTATUTORY        STOCK OPTION        GRANT AGREEMENT**

**ARTICLE        1**

**GRANT        OF        OPTION**

**Section        1.1  Grant of Option****         **

**ARTICLE        2**

**VESTING**

**Section        2.1  Vesting Schedule**

**Section        2.2  Acceleration of Vesting**

**ARTICLE        3**

**EXERCISE        OF        OPTION**

**Section        3.1  Exercisability of Option**

**Section        3.2 Manner of        Exercise**

**Section        3.3  Issuance of Shares and Payment of        Cash        upon Exercise**

**ARTICLE        4**

**TERMINATION        OF        OPTION**

**Section        4.1  Termination, In General**

**Section        4.2  Termination of Employment for        Cause**

**Section        4.3  Upon Optionee’s Death**

**Section        4.4  Termination of Employment by Reason        of        Disability**

**Section        4.5  Leave of Absence**

**ARTICLE        5**

**ADJUSTMENTS;        BUSINESS        COMBINATIONS**

**Section        5.1  Adjustments for Events Affecting        Common        Stock**

**Section        5.2  Pooling of Interests        Transaction**

**Section        5.3  Adjustments for Unusual        Events**

**Section        5.4  Binding Nature of        Adjustments**

**ARTICLE        6**

**MISCELLANEOUS**

**Section        6.1  Non-Guarantee of        Employment**

**Section        6.2  No Rights of Stockholder**

**Section        6.3  Non-Qualified Nature of        Option**

**Section        6.4  Confidential Information**

**Section        6.5  The Corporation's Rights****         **

**Section        6.6  Withholding of Taxes**

**Section        6.7  Optionee**

**Section        6.8  Nontransferability of        Option**

**Section        6.9  Notices**

**Section        6.10  Entire Agreement**

**Section        6.11  Amendments**

**Section        6.12  Conformity with Plan**

**Section        6.13  Governing Law**

**Section        6.14  Headings**

*/s/        Peter J        Rizzo     *
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13664]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Ch. II

[Docket No. 96-2]


Eligibility for the Cable Compulsory License

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is extending 
the period for filing reply comments in its rulemaking proceeding 
considering the eligibility of open video systems for the cable 
compulsory license.

DATES: Initial comments are due on or before July 5, 1996. Reply 
comments are due on or before September 13, 1996.

ADDRESSES: If delivered BY MAIL, fifteen copies of written comments 
should be addressed to the Office of the Copyright General Counsel, 
Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 
20024. If delivered BY HAND, fifteen copies of written comments should 
be brought to: Office of the Copyright General Counsel, James Madison 
Memorial Building, Room LM-407, First and Independence Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20540.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn J. Kretsinger, Acting General 
Counsel, or William Roberts, Senior Attorney for Compulsory Licenses. 
Telephone (202) 707-8380. Telefax (202) 707-8366.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 6, 1996, the Copyright Office of the 
Library of Congress published a notice of inquiry to consider the 
eligibility of open video systems (``OVS'') for the cable compulsory 
license, 17 U.S.C. 111. See 61 FR 20197 (May 6, 1996). Initial comments 
are due July 5, 1996, and reply comments are due August 5, 1996. It has 
recently come to the attention of the Office that the Federal 
Communications Commission will be completing a rulemaking proceeding 
regarding OVS in early August. Because the Commission's adoption of 
rules may have a bearing on the copyright inquiry, the Office is 
extending the period for filing reply comments in this proceeding to 
September 13, 1996, to allow interested parties to submit comments in 
light of the Commission's final OVS rules.

    Dated: May 24, 1996.
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 96-13664 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-31-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 646 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 646

         Honoring the memory and lasting legacy of Sally Crowe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2009

   Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of 
 California, Mr. Bonner, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Lewis 
 of California, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, and Mr. Mica) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Honoring the memory and lasting legacy of Sally Crowe.

Whereas Sally Crowe's career spanned more than 57 years of service, beginning in 
        1951 as a cashier in the Longworth cafeteria;
Whereas Sally moved to the Members' Dining Room in the U.S. Capitol in the 1960s 
        and remained on the job there until her passing on June 28, 2009, at the 
        age of 92;
Whereas throughout her career she provided a warm and personal welcome to 
        generations of Members, staff, and guests;
Whereas regardless of who managed the Members' Dining Room, Sally remained a 
        fixture, serving with distinction and making a special effort to know 
        every Member by name; and
Whereas Sally will be remembered for her sense of humor, her strong work ethic, 
        and her unwavering commitment to serving the House of Representatives: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the memory and 
lasting legacy of Sally Crowe, extends its gratitude for her decades of 
exemplary service, and expresses its condolences to her family and 
friends at this time of loss.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14316]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Greene Township--Conococheague Rural Historic District; 
Determination of Eligibility for the National Register of Historic 
Places

Action: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 3, 1995, the Greene Township--Conococheague Rural 
Historic District, Franklin County, Pennsylvania was determined 
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places for its historic 
and architectural importance, following a request from the Federal 
Highway Administration. The district consists of a landscape farmed 
continuously since the eighteenth century and reflects the agricultural 
patterns of the rich Cumberland Valley. Important features found in the 
district include intact farmsteads, with their significant collection 
of barns, farmhouses and outbuildings, the field patterns, fencerows, 
the network of the historic farm roads, and the remains of the once 
active and important industrial activities performed along 
Conococheague Creek. The finding of eligibility was based upon review 
of documentation submitted by the Federal Highway Administration, the 
Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, and Greene Township.
    Since the determination of eligibility was made, property owners 
within the district, the Federal Highway Administration, and township 
officials have written to us either endorsing or disagreeing with the 
determination of eligibility. In order to accommodate those who wish to 
provide new information on whether or not this property meets the 
National Register Criteria for Evaluation, the National Park Service is 
providing a 60 day comment period. A written statement on the 
determination of eligibility will be issued by the National Park 
Service within 30 days of the close of the comment period.
    The determination of eligibility remains in effect pending review 
of responses submitted during the comment period. To determine that the 
property is not eligible or to revise the boundary, the National Park 
Service must receive authoritative information, which evaluated in 
conjunction with documentation already on file, results in a finding 
that the property does not meet the National Register Criteria for 
Evaluation or that the boundary does not accurately delineate the 
historic district in accordance with established National Register 
standards.
    Comments should be addressed to the National Register of Historic 
Places, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, D.C. 20013-
7127.

Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places, National Register, 
History and Education.
[FR Doc. 96-14316 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### J. M. Wood, Respondent, v. The Kansas City, Fort Scott and Memphis Railroad Company, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

January 13, 1891.

Railroads: killing op stock : presumptions. Where an animal is shown to have been killed by oars at a point where the road is required to be, but is not, fenced, it will be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the loss was occasioned by the failure of the railway company to fence its track. And evidence, that the injury occurred where the road ran through woods, establishes, *prima facie*at least, an obligation of the company to fence its road at that point.

*Appeal from the Howell Circuit Court.*— Hon. Joseph Cravens, Judge.

Affirmed".

*B. F.*Olden, for appellant.

*Orchard & Winningham,*for respondent.

Rombauer, P. J.

This is an action for double damages under section 2611 of the Revised Statutes of 1889. The complaint states that the plaintiff ’ s mare got on defendant’s railroad track at a point; where the same passes through uninclosed fields and where the same was not fenced. The proof shows that the mare was killed by the cars of the defendant, and found by the plaintiff lying near the railroad track at a point where the railroad was not fenced, and ran through the woods. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the error assigned by the defendant on this appeal is, that there is no evidence to support the verdict in this, that the evidence fails to show that the animal got upon the track where it was the duty of the company to fence.

*295There is no merit in either of these' complaints. We have decided in *Kinion v.*Railroad, 39 Mo. App. 382, on the authority of *Walther v.*Railroad, 55 Mo. 271, that, where the animal is shown to have been killed at a point where the road is required to be fenced, and where it is not fenced, it will be presumed, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, that the damages were occasioned by a failure of the railroad *to*fence its track. The evidence here is that the animal was-killed by the defendant’s cars at a point where the railroad was not fenced, and where it was the defendant’ s duty to fence, because *prima*facie, at least, woods are either inclosed fields or uninclosed lands.

As every point made in the case has been decided adversely to' the appellant by former rulings of the supreme court and this court, we are justified in sustaining the plaintiff’s motion to affirm the judgment with damages.

Judgment affirmed with ten per cent, damages.

All the judges concur.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 395 

Supporting efforts to raise awareness, improve education, and encourage 

research of inflammatory breast cancer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2009 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting efforts to raise awareness, improve education, 

and encourage research of inflammatory breast cancer. 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is a rare but very aggressive type of breast cancer in which the cancer cells 

block the lymph vessels in the skin of the breast; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer accounts for between 1 

and 6 percent of all breast cancer cases in the United 

States; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is more common than 

acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer may have environmental 

causes; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is particularly difficult 

to detect because the early signs of breast cancer, such 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 395 IH 

as a breast lump or suspicious area on a routine screening mammogram, are rarely present in inflammatory 

breast cancer; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer tends to affect women 

at a younger age than most breast cancers; 

Whereas black women are more likely to have inflammatory 

breast cancer than white women; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is more likely to have 

metastasised at the time of diagnosis than noninflammatory breast cancer cases; 

Whereas the 5 year survival rate for patients with inflammatory breast cancer is between 25 and 50 percent, 

which is significantly lower than the survival rate for patients with noninflammatory breast cancer; 

Whereas the incidence rate for inflammatory breast cancer is 

on the rise, and the cause of this increase is unknown; 

Whereas organizations such as the Inflammatory Breast Cancer Foundation are working to increase awareness of the 

disease in the public and medical communities; 

Whereas the MD Anderson Cancer Center at the University 

of Texas is among one of the only facilities in the country 

to have a clinic specifically dedicated to inflammatory 

breast cancer; and 

Whereas many physicians remain unaware of inflammatory 

breast cancer and diagnosis is frequently delayed due to 

a lack of knowledge in both the lay and medical communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Federal Government has a responsi3 bility to— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 395 IH 

1 (1) endeavor to raise awareness and improve 

2 education about inflammatory breast cancer; 

3 (2) encourage the American Medical Associa4 tion to take steps to immediately increase awareness 

5 of inflammatory breast cancer among physicians; 

6 (3) encourage research that will improve treat7 ments for inflammatory breast cancer; and 

8 (4) continue to consider ways to improve access 

9 to information on inflammatory breast cancer for 

10 both doctors and patients. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Martin Osvaldo Torres-Flores, 

Defendant.

No. CR-17-8271-PCT-JJT

DETENTION ORDER 

 In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of 

detention was addressed at a hearing on December 27, 2017. The Court was informed 

that the defendant is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time. 

 The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to 

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such 

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to 

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The 

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court 

proceeding. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of 

this detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion 

for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third 

party custodian. 

 Dated this 28th day of December, 2017.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ J. Eric PikeJ. Eric Pike
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
November 14, 2006/s/ Anthony K. SlaterAnthony K. Slater
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
November 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Newport International Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Cery B.
Perle, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                      /s/ Cery B. Perle
                                      -----------------
                                      Cery B. Perle, CEO, President,
                                      principal executive officer and
                                      principal financial and accounting officer

April 14, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.