alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Dror Svorai, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of AVWORKS AVIATION CORP. (f/k/a DATAMILL MEDIA CORP.);





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.






Date: March 27, 2014
By:
/s/ Dror SvoraiDror Svorai,President and Treasurer
#### Victory A. MACKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63604.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 28, 1993.

Lew A. Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appedant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

Defendant pleaded gudty to driving whde intoxicated (DWI), resisting arrest, driving with a revoked dcense, and assaulting a law officer. The trial court sentenced Defendant to three years each on Counts I and II and one year each on Counts III and IV. Ad the sentences were to be served concurrently with each other, but consecutively to a prior conviction.

Defendant subsequently filed a timely Rule 24.035 motion requesting his judgment and sentence be set aside for the fodowing: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel for unfairly inducing him to plead gudty when sentences were to be served consecutively to a prior sentence; (2) the court improperly ap*704plied § 577.028 in calculating the number of Defendant’s prior DWIs; and (3) the officers of the court were biased against Defendant. The motion court denied Defendant’s motion by merely making a docket entry stating, “Motion overruled.”

On appeal, Defendant argues, and the State concedes, the motion court clearly erred in failing to issue specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. We agree.

Rule 24.035(i) states the motion court “shall issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues presented, whether or not a hearing is held_” In *Barry v. State,*850 S.W.2d 348, 349 — 50[1] (Mo. banc 1993), the Missouri Supreme Court found a memorandum to be insufficient for appellate review where the motion court summarily denied the motion without setting forth any reasons. The Court found a mere recital that the defendant is entitled to no relief does not comport with Rule 24.035(i). *Id.*Until the motion court enters sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law, appellate review is not possible.

Both the State and Defendant encourage this court to review a second point related only to an issue of law, not fact. However, the exception to which they refer is that *findings of fact*are not required if the issue is only one of law. *Id.*at 350[2j; *Williams v. State,*744 S.W.2d 814, 817[3] (Mo.App.1987). That exception will not apply where the motion court has also failed to issue conclusions of law. *Barry,*850 S.W.2d at 350[2], Here, the motion court has completely failed to issue any findings of fact as well as conclusions of law.

The judgment is reversed and remanded for the motion court to comply with Rule 24.035G).

CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 1/2015)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9 PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS 9 9

DAILY 9 9

HOURLY 9 9

REALTIME 9 9

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)

By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE.

19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-DTF Document 101 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 742 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 1, 2009. 

Whereas, on August 19, 2009, the Warner Robins Little 

League softball team from Warner Robins, Georgia, defeated the Crawford Little League softball team from 

Crawford, Texas, by a score of 14–2 to win the 2009 Little League Softball World Series Championship in Portland, Oregon; 

Whereas the 2009 Warner Robins Little League Softball 

World Championship team consists of players Carson 

Carriker, Sierra Stella, Chelsea Whaley, Caitlin Parker, 

Melissa Cox, Kelly Warner, Sabrina Doucette, Hanna 

Livingston, Kaylee Albritton, Ashley Killebrew, Avery 

Lamb, and Sydney Barker; 

Whereas the 2009 Warner Robins Little League Softball 

World Championship team is led by Manager Emily 

Whaley, Coach Roger Stella, Coach Patti Carriker, and 

President Kenneth Hathaway; 

Whereas with this title, the Warner Robins Little League becomes the first little league to have won both a baseball 

and softball World Series Championship; 

Whereas the championship victory of the Warner Robins Little League softball team sets an example of sportsman-
2 

•HRES 742 EH 

ship, dedication, and a ‘‘never give up’’ spirit for men 

and women all across the country; and 

Whereas the achievement of the Warner Robins Little League 

softball team is the cause of enormous pride for the Nation, the State of Georgia, and the city of Warner Robins: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the Warner Robins Little League 

softball team from Warner Robins, Georgia, on winning 

the 2009 Little League Softball World Series Championship; and 

(2) respectfully requests that the Clerk of the 

House transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the 

City of Warner Robins and each player, manager, and 

coach of the Warner Robins Little League softball team. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Graham K. Cooper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.;

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Graham K. Cooper                 
|Graham K. Cooper                     
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Willie B. THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 547-91.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Nov. 18, 1992.

*959Kenneth W. Smith, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Winston E. Cochran, Jr. and Susan Baetz Brown, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Appellant guilty of possession of cocaine. The court found the enhancement allegations to be true and assessed punishment at confinement for thirty-five years. The Court of Appeals reversed Appellant’s conviction. *Thomas v. State,*807 S.W.2d 786 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1991) (opinion on rehearing).

After further consideration of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that the State’s petition was improvidently granted.

The State’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

BAIRD, J.,

dissents, believing the case should be remanded to the Court of Appeals to conduct a harm analysis pursuant to TRAP 81(b)(2).

WHITE, J., joins this note.
#### E.C. & Charles Harter, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Lloyd MIESNER, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 68786.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 21, 1996.

Charles A. Harter, Washington, for appellants.

Steven P. Kuenzel, Eekelkamp, Eckel-kamp, Wood & Kuenzel, Washington, for respondent.

Before GERARD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of judgment for defendant in a small claim trial de novo concerning an automobile collision. The trial court acted within its discretion in refusing to allow a rebuttal witness to testify. Plaintiffs’ other claims of error all involve questions of credibility, for which we defer to the trial court. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for the Court’s decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 31.2****MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony Slater, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pike Electric Corporation 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: May 8, 2007 /s/ Anthony K. Slater Anthony K. Slater    Chief Financial Officer
Appeal Notice of Assignment 

CAUSE NO. 73810 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 149th District Court 

vs of 

JOSHUA EUGENE PLASTER Brazoria County, Texas 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT ON APPEAL 

 ON THE 17th day of June, 2015, the defendant in the above styled and numbered cause 

excepted to the order of the Court in said cause and gave Notice of Appeal to the Court of 

Appeals, Fourteenth Judicial District. 

Date of Judgment or Other Order Appealed From: 5/20/15 

Date of Sentencing: 5/20/15 

Name of Trial Court Judge: Terri Holder 

Name of Court Reporter: Robin Rios 

Name and Address of Defense Attorney on Appeal: 

 Keith G. Allen, (Appointed) 

 2360 CR 94, Suite 106 

 Pearland, Texas 77584 

 

Name and Address of Attorney for the State on Appeal: 

 Jeri Yenne, District Attorney 

 Brazoria County Courthouse 

 111 East Locust, Suite 408-A 

 Angleton, TX 77515 

Defendant Incarcerated? Yes 

Motion for New Trial Filed? 6/17/15 

Appeal Bond: No Date N/A 

Offense and Punishment: Aggravated Robbery; Fifteen (15) years - TDCJ-ID 

 RHONDA BARCHAK, District Clerk 

 By /S/ Kathleen McDougald, Deputy

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/17/2015 3:11:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 2 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 3 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 4 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 5 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 6 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 7 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 8 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 9 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 10 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 11 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 12 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 13 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 14 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 15 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 16 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 17 of 18
Case 4:18-cv-00099-RM Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 18 of 18
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 650 

Recognizing that country music has made a tremendous contribution to American life and culture and declaring country music to be a uniquely 

American art form. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2009 

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing that country music has made a tremendous contribution to American life and culture and declaring 

country music to be a uniquely American art form. 

Whereas country music was created in the United States and 

its distinctive sound makes it a uniquely American institution; 

Whereas country music is rooted in the folk traditions of the 

British Isles; 

Whereas in the United States, those roots became entangled 

with the ethnic music of immigrants from other regions 

and African slaves to create a uniquely American sound; 

Whereas in 1922, a country music performance was broadcast on the radio for the first time, and the earliest commercial recording of country music was made, featuring 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 650 IH 

the song ‘‘Sallie Gooden’’, performed by fiddlist A.C. 

‘‘Eck’’ Robertson; 

Whereas throughout the 1920s, the earliest country music 

records and radio programs brought the music out of the 

rural heartland and into homes across the United States; 

Whereas no institution is more closely associated with country music than WSM Radio’s Grand Ole Opry in Nashville, Tennessee, which, since 1925, has introduced the 

United States to many of the great talents of country 

music through live Saturday night performances; 

Whereas two of the top selling solo artists of all time, Elvis 

Presley and Garth Brooks, are rooted in country music; 

Whereas Garth Brooks, with 128,000,000 records sold, is the 

top selling solo artist in United States history; 

Whereas top country musician Willie Nelson said that country music is where ‘‘people tell their life stories’’; and 

Whereas country music continues to increase in popularity in 

the United States and around the world: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) declares country music to be a uniquely 

3 American art form; and 

4 (2) recognizes that country music should be 

5 honored for its contributions to American life and 

6 culture. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Angelica T. Damiano, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Indian Trade Center Incorporated, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-04204-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

Having reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 15), and good 

cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is dismissed in its 

entirety with prejudice – including as to the claims alleged against MHA Enterprises, 

Inc. in a proposed Amended Verified Complaint [Doc. 11-2] – with each side to bear its 

own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated this 12th day of February, 2018. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:17-cv-04204-GMS Document 16 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Guillermo Escamilla-Bermudes, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-0100-PHX-DLR 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On September 18, 2018, defendant, Guillermo Escamilla-Bermudes, appeared 

before this Court on a petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered 

the information provided to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining 

whether the defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed 

on supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition 

to revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 19th day of September, 2018.