alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 664 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 664

Congratulating and honoring Barnes Jewish Hospital, Henry Ford Medical 
 Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Integris Baptist Hospital for the 
        completion of a successful 16-person kidney transplant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2009

 Mr. Clay (for himself, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, Mr. Cummings, and 
 Ms. Fallin) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating and honoring Barnes Jewish Hospital, Henry Ford Medical 
 Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Integris Baptist Hospital for the 
        completion of a successful 16-person kidney transplant.

Whereas, on July 7, 2009, Barnes Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri, Henry 
        Ford Medical Center in Detroit, Michigan, Johns Hopkins in Baltimore, 
        Maryland, and Integris Baptist Hospital in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 
        successfully completed a 16-patient kidney transplant;
Whereas during the procedure, 8 donors donated kidneys to 8 recipients in the 4 
        different hospitals over a 3-week period through a Paired Kidney 
        Exchange;
Whereas Paired Kidney Exchange matches potential kidney recipients with willing 
        donors but incompatible blood and tissue with similar donor/recipient 
        pairs;
Whereas the completion of this procedure marked the largest chain of donations 
        in history;
Whereas the Paired Kidney Exchange program will stand as a blueprint for a 
        national match system in which kidneys will be transported to different 
        transplant centers across the country; and
Whereas such a system will allow for an estimated 1,500 more transplants a year: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates and 
honors Barnes Jewish Hospital, Henry Ford Medical Center, Johns Hopkins 
Hospital, and Integris Baptist Hospital for the completion of a 
successful 16-person kidney transplant.
                                 <all>
```
##### 

\

Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 of Ready Mix, Inc. (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 9, 2007
    /s/ Bradley E. LarsonBradley E. LarsonChief Executive Officer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jesus Sanchez Sanchez, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Carla Hacker Agnew, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-18-00518-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 Before the Court is Petitioner Jesus Sanchez Sanchez’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and United States Magistrate Judge Deborah M. 

Fine’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Docs. 1, 14.) The R&R recommends 

that the Petition be denied and dismissed, and no certificate of appealability be issued 

because dismissal is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not 

find the procedural ruling debatable. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they 

had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections 

could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. See United States 

v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Petitioner did not file objections, 

which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 

at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . 

require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless 

reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will accept the R&R and 

deny the Petition and dismiss. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court 

“may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations 

made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, 

or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to 

the magistrate judge with instructions.”). 

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Fine’s R&R (Doc. 14) is ACCEPTED. 

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1.) is DISMISSED. The Clerk of 

the Court shall terminate this case. 

 Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order 

denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability 

is denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar. 

 Dated this 16th day of October, 2018. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Terri J. REVALEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 67871.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 16, 1996.

John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

*ORDER*

Before KAROHL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and CRANDALL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Terri J. Revalee (defendant) appeals after a jury trial, conviction and sentencing on a charge of receiving stolen property. Section 570.080 RSMo 1986.

The preserved factual dispute is whether defendant was coerced into making a self-incriminating statement to police officers. She filed a motion to suppress and objected to the admission of her statement that she was aware she possessed two items of stolen personal property. This admission represented the only available proof of her knowledge.

The sole claim of error is the trial court erred in failing to suppress her statement and allowing its admission. She claims the statement was the product of an inherently coercive interrogation, induced by false promises that she would not go to jail and *443would be free to leave without criminal charges filed.

This claim is without merit because the police officer testified he advised defendant of her *Miranda*rights and did not make any deals or promises to obtain a statement. He testified he informed her he could not make any deals and only the prosecuting attorney for the county could decide whether or not to file charges. The court believed the officer’s version of the event.

Admitting or excluding defendant’s statement became a question of fact for the trial court. The trial court determines credibility of witnesses. *State v. Villa-Perez,*835 S.W.2d 897, 902 (Mo. banc 1992). We are bound to affirm the trial court’s decision if there is evidence sufficient to support its findings. *State v. Burkhardt,*795 S.W.2d 399, 404 (Mo. banc 1990).

We affirm.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 14, 2014

No. 04-14-00484-CV

IN RE CAPITOL COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on July 8, 2014. On August 13, 2014, 

relator filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus on the basis that 

the issues raised in the mandamus proceeding have been rendered moot by the parties’ agreement 

in the underlying matter. 

Relator’s unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus is GRANTED. 

This original mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT. This court’s opinion will issue 

at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on August 14th, 2014.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of August, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-14402, styled Albertha Stiff v. Capitol County Mutual Fire 

Insurance Co., pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales 

presiding.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 75 

Honoring Chesley B. ‘‘Sully’’ Sullenberger III and the crew of US Airways 

Flight 1549 for their heroism, calm under pressure, and dedication 

to the safety of passengers on board. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2009 

Mr. MCNERNEY (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. CARDOZA, Ms. 

ESHOO, Mr. FARR, Mr. FILNER, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. 

GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. 

SHERMAN, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. THOMPSON of California, and Mr. WAXMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Chesley B. ‘‘Sully’’ Sullenberger III and the crew 

of US Airways Flight 1549 for their heroism, calm under 

pressure, and dedication to the safety of passengers on 

board. 

Whereas on January 15, 2009, Chesley B. ‘‘Sully’’ 

Sullenberger III piloted US Airways Flight 1549, destined for Charlotte, North Carolina, from New York’s 

LaGuardia Airport; 

Whereas 155 people were on board Flight 1549; 

Whereas the plane experienced difficulty within minutes of 

takeoff; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 75 IH 

Whereas Mr. Sullenberger’s quick thinking and heroic actions 

allowed him to set down the plane in the Hudson River, 

saving the lives of everyone on board and avoiding any 

casualties on the ground in the densely-populated New 

York metropolitan area; 

Whereas after ditching in the Hudson River and assisting all 

passengers in evacuating the aircraft, Mr. Sullenberger 

walked the length of the plane twice to ensure that all 

passengers had safely exited; 

Whereas Mr. Sullenberger has close to 40 years of flying experience, including 7 years in the United States Air 

Force and nearly 30 years with US Airways; 

Whereas Mr. Sullenberger is committed to flight safety and 

has worked as a safety instructor for his airline; in addition, he developed safety guidelines for the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration; and 

Whereas thanks to the heroism, grace, calmness, determination, and dedication honored by Mr. Sullenberger and the 

crew of US Airways Flight 1549, 155 lives were saved 

and many more were spared: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors Chesley B. Sullenberger III as the 

3 ‘‘Hero of the Hudson’’; 

4 (2) commends Chesley B. Sullenberger III for 

5 his display of courage; and 

6 (3) praises Chesley B. Sullenberger III not only 

7 for his commitment to the safety of the passengers 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 75 IH 

1 on his plane, but for his safety-related efforts with 

2 respect to the airline industry as a whole. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

THERESA BROOKE, a married woman ) 

dealing with her sole and separate claim, ) 

) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

) 

vs. ) 

) 

DAWN, LLC, an Arizona limited liability ) 

company, d/b/a Mainstay Suites, ) No. 2:17-cv-4614-HRH

) 

Defendant. ) 

_______________________________________) 

O R D E R

Notice of Dismissal

The parties have settled this case.1 In furtherance of the court’s minute order of

April 17, 2017,2

 the parties not having filed closing papers or a status report, the court

now assumes that the parties have carried out the terms of their settlement agreement, and

plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice in furtherance of the parties’ settlement

agreement. 

DATED at Anchorage, Alaska, this 30th day of April, 2018. 

/s/ H. Russel Holland 

United States District Judge

1Docket No. 14. 

2Docket No. 16. 

Order – Notice of Dismissal - 1 -

Case 2:17-cv-04614-HRH Document 17 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32





COPSYNC, INC.





CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS


(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Matinee Media Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.




Date: August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ RUSSELL D. CHANEYRussell D. ChaneyChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer





The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Case 2:17-cv-04775-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cv-04775-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cv-04775-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cv-04775-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/17 Page 4 of 4
Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 161 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 161 Filed 03/04/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14448]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II; Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II in June.
    A summary of the meeting may be obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, 
Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA Office of Extramural Activities 
Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, Rockville, Maryland 20857. 
Telephone: (301)443-4783.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the individual 
named as Contact for the meeting listed below.
    The meeting will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual contract proposals. These discussions could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals and 
confidential and financial information about an individual's proposal. 
The discussion may also reveal information about procurement activities 
exempt from disclosure by statute and trade secrets and commercial or 
financial information obtained from a person and privileged and 
confidential. Accordingly, the meeting is concerned with matters exempt 
from mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (4), and (6) 
and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Sec. 10(d).

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II.
    Meeting Date: June 17, 1996.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, Randolph Room, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Closed: June 17, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Contact: Constance M. Burtoff, M.A., Room 17-89, Parklawn 
Building, Telephone: (301)443-2437 and FAX: (301)443-3437.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 96-14448 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
2014 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of A

ppe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

12-15-2014 

# M ich a el Leh t one n v

. Go ve r nor of the V

ir g in I sl a nd s
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ock e t N o . 13-2063

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2014

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of A

ppe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2014 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" M ich a e l L e h t one n v

. Go v e r nor of the V

ir g in I sl a nd s " (2014). 2014 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 1259. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2014/1259

### NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 13

- 2063

_____________ MICHAEL P. LEHTONEN,

Appellant v. GOVERNOR OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS; et al.

______________ No. 1 3

- 2064

______________ MICHAEL P. LEHTONEN,

Appellant v. BRENDA J. HOLLAR; KATHLEEN MACKAY; JAMES CARROLL, III

______________ (D.C. No s . 3

- 1 1

- c v - 0 0134, 3

- 12

- cv - 00012 )

______________ O RDER

______________ At the direction of the Court the opinion and judgment entered in thi s matter on December 12, 2014 are hereby VACATED as being entered prematurely. A revised opinion and judgment shall be entered. For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date d : December 15, 2014 JK/cc: All Counsel on Record
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-41465) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1996 Equity
Incentive Plan of AutoCyte, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-41467) pertaining to the 1997 Director Stock Option Plan of our report
dated February 13, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of AutoCyte, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1998
Case 2:17-cr-01535-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01535-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/26/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01535-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/26/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01535-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/26/17 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of HanKersen International Corp.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2007.


March 28, 2008

By: /S/ YI TONG
    -------------
      Yi Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer