alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T07:43:49Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T07:43:50Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T07:43:50Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12705">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T07:43:49Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION #,~0-7436 WAS NEVER ISSUED OR 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Steven Snyder,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 No. 17-548MJ

MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER

Defendant, having been charged in the District of Arizona with a violation of Title 8,

United States Code, Section 1324 (a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Magistrate Judge having determined

from the affidavit of Albert A. Martinez filed in this case, the following persons can provide

testimony that is material to the offense alleged in the Complaint:

 Fabrocio Romero-Hernandez, Eric Avila-Sierra, Josue Machorro-Martinez, and

 Juan Jose Lopez-Roca 

The Magistrate Judge finds that it may become impracticable to secure the presence of the

witnesses by subpoena in further proceedings because they are not in the United States

legally and have no legal residence or employment in this Country.

IT IS ORDERED that the witnesses shall be detained pursuant to 18 USC § 3144 in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

 sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The witness(es) shall be afforded a

reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

DATED this 16th day of November, 2017.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14655]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP95-408-000 and RP95-408-001]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

June 5, 1996.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference in this 
proceeding will be convened on Thursday, June 13, 1996 at 10:00 a.m., 
continuing through Friday, June 14, if necessary. The settlement 
conference will be held at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, for the 
purpose of exploring the possible settlement of the above referenced 
docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Thomas J. Burgess at 208-2058 
or David R. Cain at 208-0917.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14655 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

MICHAEL ANDREW RABEL, 

 Respondent 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2144 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 33 DB 2015 & File Nos. C4-13-299, 

C4-13-447, C4-13-850, C4-13-885, C4-14-

288, C4-15-83, C4-15-108, C4-15-371, 

C4-15-406 & C4-15-506 

Attorney Registration No. 201443

(Allegheny County) 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2016 upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint 

Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted. Michael Andrew Rabel 

is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, 

and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. 

 It is further ordered that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board 

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eric HAMILTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 65496, 67940.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 26, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of two counts of second degree robbery, § 569.030, RSMo 1994. Count I referred to the November 4, 1992 robbery of money from a woman. Count II referred to the November 13, 1992 robbery of an automobile from a man. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior and persistent offender to two concurrent terms of twenty years imprisonment.

Defendant claims the trial court plainly erred when it refused to sever the offenses before trial and when it overruled his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*403The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL J. STEPHANIC, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 385 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Rachel Wosk, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International
     Cellular, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of August, 2005.


/s/ Rachel Wosk
------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### William P. SKAGGS, Complainant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 95-SC-753-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Jan. 18, 1996.

Bruce K. Davis, Jay R. Garrett, Kentucky Bar Association, Frankfort, for Complainant.

William Paul Skaggs, Bowling Green, Respondent pro se.

*OPINION AND ORDER*

The Kentucky Bar Association, as a result of charges initiated against the respondent, William Paul Skaggs, has recommended his suspension from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for a period of three months. This court adopts the recommendation of the KBA.

Samuel Wade Wilkey employed Skaggs to prosecute an appeal from a judgment entered against Wilkey in the amount of $37,-870.97. The Court of Appeals dismissed Wil-key’s case due to inordinate delay after Skaggs failed to timely file a brief. Two weeks after the dismissal, Skaggs tendered the court a brief and a motion to reconsider the dismissal, but failed to tender the filing fee. Although brought to his attention, this deficiency was never corrected, thus the dismissal stood and the circuit court judgment became final.

The Inquiry Tribunal charged Skaggs with two counts of violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. Count I charged Skaggs with violating SCR 3.130-1.3 by failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing Wilkey. In Count II, the Tribunal charged Skaggs with violating SCR 3.130-8.1(b) by failing to respond to the complaint filed against him with the KBA and with violating SCR 3.160(1) by failing to respond to or acknowledge receipt of the complaint. The charge was sent to Skaggs via certified mail and was also personally served upon him.

Because Skaggs filed no answer to the charge against him, the matter came before the Board of Governors for a default judgment hearing. The Board of Governors returned a unanimous verdict of guilty on Count I and a unanimous verdict of not guilty on Count II. A majority of the Board of Governors then voted that Skaggs be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the evidence adequately supports the recommendation of the Kentucky Bar Association, and we adopt its recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That the respondent, William Paul Skaggs, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for a period of three months, and until such further time as he is reinstated to the practice of law by order of this court pursuant to SCR 3.510.

*745The respondent is directed to pay the costs of this action in the sum of $42.34.

Pursuant to SCR 3.390, the respondent shall, -within ten days from the date of the entry of this order, notify all clients in -writing of his inability to represent them and furnish photostatic copes of said letters of notice to the director of the Kentucky Bar Association.

All concur.

ENTERED: January 18,1996.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF BILL SCHAEFER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Legends Business Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: December 19, 2013  By :/s/ Bill SchaeferBill SchaeferChief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John A. Rade, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of I-many, Inc.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN A. RADE                               
|                     |  |  |  | John A. Rade President and Chief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133021 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133021 

 COA: 270705 

Wayne CC: 01-003496-01

JOHNATHAN WEBB, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Samuel MAYWEATHER, Appellant. Samuel MAYWEATHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 58840, 61664.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 7, 1993.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

*678Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jeffi-fer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDÉR*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his *Batson*challenge to the State’s peremptory strikes of four venirepersons after this court remanded to the trial court to determine whether said strikes were racially motivated, 865 S.W.2d 672. We find no clear error in such denial. *State v. Pullen,*843 S.W.2d 360, 362—63[3] (Mo. banc 1992).

We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14175]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Proposed Posting of Stockyard

    The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, United 
States Department of Agriculture, has information that the livestock 
markets named below are stockyards as defined in Section 302 of the 
Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. 202), and should be made subject 
to the provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended 
(7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.).

AL-189--Graben Livestock Auction Sales, Tisgah, Alabama
FL-137--Hidden Creek Auction, Jacksonville, Florida
MO-280--Brookfield Sales Company, Brookfield, Missouri
NC-171--Foothills Livestock Auction, Inc., Cliffside, North Carolina

    Pursuant to the authority under section 302 of the Packers and 
Stockyards Act, notice is hereby given that it is proposed to designate 
the stockyards named above as posted stockyards subject to the 
provisions of said act.
    Any person who wishes to submit written data, views or arguments 
concerning the proposed designation may do so by filing them with the 
Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Grain Inspection, Packers and 
Stockyards Administration, Room 3408-South Building, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250 by June 14, 1996. All written 
submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made available for 
public inspection in the office of the Director of the Livestock 
Marketing Division during normal business hours.

    Done at Washington, D.C., this 30th day of May 1996.
Daniel L. Van Ackeren,
Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Packers and Stockyards 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 96-14175 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P
Exhibit
10.26





English
Translation of the Loan Agreement




Party A:
Guihua Lin




Party B:
Sutor Technology Group Limited




Whereas,
pursuant to relevant rules and regulations and based on the principles of
fairness and friendly consultation, the parties have reached the following
agreement “the “Agreement”) regarding a loan of $2.86 million (the “Loan”)
provided by Party A to Party B:




Article
I: Amount of the Loan




Party B
intends to borrow $2.86 million from Party A for working capital. Party A will
wire such amount of the Loan to Party B or its designated bank account within 60
days after the execution of the Agreement.




Article
II: Term of the Loan




The Loan
has a term of three years, starting from November 20, 2008 to November 20,
2011.




Article
III: Interest Rates




The
annual interest rate is 6% which is subject to adjustment based on the lending
rate over the same period published by the People’s Bank of China as well as the
parties’ agreement.




Article
IV: Method of Payment




Party B
shall repay the principal and all the interest in full within 15 days after the
term of the Loan expires. Otherwise, Party B shall be legally liable for all the
unpaid amount.




Article
V. Breach




5.1 Party
A shall wire the Loan amount to Party B or its designated bank account within 60
days after the execution of the Agreement (holidays not counted). If Party A
fails to wire the Loan amount to Party B on time, Party A shall pay a penalty
equal to the result of the unwired amount multiplied by the days delayed plus 6%
interests.




5.2 Any
party that fails to carry out its responsibilities specified in the Agreement
shall be deemed as breach of the Agreement. The breaching party shall be liable
to all costs and expenses to the other party.




Article
VI. Termination




6.1 Party
B shall make the repayment pursuant to the Agreement. Party B shall give Party A
at least 60 days notice if Party B intends to request an extension to repay the
Loan.  The parties shall reach an agreement with regard to an
extension based on friendly negotiation.




6.2 The
Agreement becomes effective upon execution. The Agreement shall not be amended
without mutual consent of both parties. The parties shall reach separate
agreement with regard to matters not covered by the Agreement.




Article
VII. Dispute




The
parties shall consult each other to settle any disputes. If the parties fail to
settle any dispute, any party may take the dispute to an appropriate local
court.




Article
VIII. Miscellaneous




8.1 The
appendices of the Agreement are deemed as integral parts of the Agreement and
are legally binding.




8.2 The
Agreement is executed in duplicate and each party shall hold one
copy.




8.3 Any
additional agreement reached by the parties shall be listed below.




Party A:
                /s/ Guihua Lin
                
                Party B: Sutor Technology Group LimitedDate: Nov.
      20, 2008
                
                (Seal)