alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Signet International Holdings, Inc.
File No. 000-51185

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       as adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ernest W.
Letiziano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: August 19, 2006                 By:  /s/ Ernest W. Letiziano
                                               Ernest W. Letiziano
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet
International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### J. D. Cobb, Respondent, v. The Kansas City, Fort Scott and Memphis Railroad Company, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

January 13, 1891.

Railroads: killing ok stock. It is no defense to an action against a railway company for the killing of stock owing to the failure of the company to fence its road, that, at the time of the injury complained of, the road had not been in operation for three months ; the statutory obligation of the company to fence begins at least as soon as cars are run over the road.

*Appeal from the Howell Circuit Court.*— Hon. Joseph Cravens, Judge.

Affirmed.

*B. F. Olden,*for appellant.

*Orchard & Winningham,*for respondent.

Rombauer, P. J.

The plaintiff filed a statement before a justice, alleging that his horse came upon the defendant’s track and was killed by the defendant’s engine and cars at a point in Howell township, Howell *314county, where the defendant’s railroad ran through the inclosed fields of one Gfalloway. The statement further charged that the horse was in said fields by the permission, consent and direction of said G-alloway, and came upon the track owing to the defendant’s failure to fence its road at a point where it was required to do so by law.

The justice, before whom the cause was tried, describes himself in the transcript and certificate sent to the circuit court as a justice of the peace in and for Howell township. There was judgment for plaintiff in the circuit court, and the only errors complained of by the appealing defendant are, that there is no evidence that the justice had jurisdiction of the cause, nor that the railroad had been in operation more than three months before the date of the injury.

, The first complaint as above shown is refuted by the record *(Kinion v.*Railroad, 39 Mo. App. 382,) and the second is not legally available. A railroad’s obligation to fence begins at least as early as it runs cars' upon its road, and not three months thereafter as the defendant’assumes. *Silver v. Railroad,*78 Mo. 528; *Comings v.*Railroad, 48 Mo. 512. The adjoining owner has a right to fence under the statute after the lapse of three months, if the railroad fails to do so; but such right is cumulative, and does not deprive him of his right of action under other provisions of section 2611. *Carpenter v.*Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 644.

As every point raised on this appeal has been decided adversely to appellant by former decisions of the supreme court and this court, the plaintiff’s motion that the judgment should be affirmed with damages is well taken.

Judgment affirmed with ten per cent, damages.

All the judges concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors


Sutor Technology Group Limited





As an independent registered public accounting firm, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-161026) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-162144) of Sutor Technology Group Limited and subsidiaries of our report dated October 13, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sutor Technology Group Limited. and subsidiaries, which appears on page F-2 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and exchange Commission on October 13, 2011.





/s/ HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.Salt Lake City, UtahOctober 13, 2011
#### Anthony PETALINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51997.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 27, 1996.

David Simpson, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

*574John M. Morris, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Petalino appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconvietion relief. He contends the motion court erred in failing to find that his trial counsel was ineffective. The judgment is affirmed.

Petalino’s arguments are entirely without merit. There is no precedential value in the publication of an opinion. A memorandum of the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,
2006, of Dresser-Rand Group Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared:(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 8, 2006
    
    
    
    /s/ Vincent R. Volpe Jr.Vincent R. Volpe Jr.President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
 Page 38 of 41
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 511410, Inc., for the Quarter Ending April 30, 2006, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 511410, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 511410, Inc. 

 
| Dated: June 8, 2006 |
|---------------------|

 

**511410, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Scott Raleigh*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Leonard Sabori Sanchez, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. CV18-0080 PHX DGC (JFM) 

ORDER 

 

 Petitioner Leonard Sabori Sanchez has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate James F. Metcalf has 

issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the petition be denied 

and dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 13. No objection has been filed, which relieves the 

Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the petition. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 13) is accepted. 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed 

with prejudice. 

3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on 

appeal are denied
‐ 2 ‐ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. 

Dated this 23rd day of July, 2018.
PHX 332872934v2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Green Jacket Auctions, Inc. and Ryan Carey, 

on Behalf of Green Jacket Auctions, Inc.,

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants,

v.

Augusta National, Inc., 

Defendant/Counterclaimant.

Lead Case No. CV-18-00084-PHX- GMS

Consolidated Case No. CV-18-01276- PHX-GMS

ORDER

Upon stipulation of the parties hereto, and good cause appearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing this matter without prejudice, with each 

party to bear their respective attorneys’ fees and costs.

Case 2:18-cv-00084-GMS Document 57-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2

 

 

I, E. Lynn Wilkinson, Chief Financial Officer of Omega Flex, Inc., certify that: 

 

1.        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

 

 (c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)               All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses (if any) in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)               Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 13, 2006 

 

/s/ E. Lynn Wilkinson______________________

 

E. Lynn Wilkinson 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12862]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary


Senior Executive Service; Appointment of a Member to the 
Performance Review Board

    Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) provides that Notice of the appointment 
of an individual to serve as a member of the Performance Review Board 
of the Senior Executive Service shall be published in the Federal 
Register.
    The following individual is hereby appointed to a three-year term 
on the Department's Performance Review Board:

Cynthia A. Metzler

    For Further Information Contact: Mr. Larry K. Goodwin, Director of 
Human Resources, Room C5526, U.S. Department of Labor, Frances Perkins 
Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, 
telephone: (202) 219-6551.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 17th day of May, 1996.
Robert B. Reich,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 96-12862 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stanley Major, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 QSB of Major Creations Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  June 14, 2006





By: /s/ Stanley Major



Stanley Major

President and CEO
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:17-cv-04795-SMB Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 18 of 18
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Anto nio, Texas** 

July 10, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00221

- CV

Tommy Lee BROWN , Jr.
, Appellant

v.

Sandra Ann BROWN
, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CI06544 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on June 7, 2019 . The appellant’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to July 8, 2019 . On July 8, 2019 , the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until August 7, 2019 , for a total extension of sixty days. The motion is GRANTED. THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED . The App ellant’s brief must be filed by August 7, 2019

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of July, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of Court
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 663 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any savings under 

the Medicare Program should be invested back into the Medicare Program, rather than creating new entitlement programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2009 

Mr. MORAN of Kansas submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

any savings under the Medicare Program should be invested back into the Medicare Program, rather than creating new entitlement programs. 

Whereas the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund established under section 1817 of the Social Security Act (42 

U.S.C. 1395i) is projected to be insolvent by 2017; and 

Whereas the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 

Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) is the largest 

source of general revenue spending on health care for 

both the Federal Government and the States: Now, therefore, be it 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 663 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) any savings under the Medicare Program 

4 under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) should be invested back into 

6 the Medicare Program, rather than creating new en7 titlement programs; and 

8 (2) any savings under the Medicaid Program 

9 under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) should be used to increase the 

11 Federal medical assistance percentage (as defined in 

12 section 1905(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b))). 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS