alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 60 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 10, 2009. 

Whereas Sam Bradford was born on November 8, 1987, to 

Kent and Martha Bradford; 

Whereas Sam Bradford’s mother and father have instilled in 

him an unparalleled work ethic, outstanding leadership 

qualities, and a desire to excel; 

Whereas Sam Bradford is an active citizen of the Cherokee 

Nation of Oklahoma; 

Whereas Sam Bradford is a dedicated student at the University of Oklahoma, majoring in Finance and maintaining 

a 3.95 grade point average; 

Whereas Sam Bradford is a member of the University of 

Oklahoma’s Fellowship of Christian Athletes; 

Whereas Sam Bradford is the quarterback for the University 

of Oklahoma’s football team (Oklahoma) and has played 

an integral role in such team’s 2008 National Collegiate 

Athletic Association’s (NCAA) national championship 

bid; 

Whereas Sam Bradford completed 48 touchdown passes in 

the regular season, setting a University of Oklahoma 

record for touchdowns in a single season, and also leading the nation in touchdown passes in the 2008 season; 
2 

•HRES 60 EH 

Whereas in 2008 Sam Bradford surpassed the NCAA record 

for most touchdowns by a quarterback through his freshmen and sophomore years; 

Whereas in 2008 Sam Bradford led the nation in passing efficiency with a percentage of 186.28; 

Whereas on October 18, 2008, Sam Bradford passed for 468 

yards against the University of Kansas, setting a University of Oklahoma record for most passing yards in a single game; 

Whereas in 2008 Sam Bradford guided Oklahoma to a 12– 

1 record and played an essential role in Oklahoma’s victory over the University of Missouri in the 2008 Big 12 

Championship game on December 6, 2008; and 

Whereas on December 13, 2008, Sam Bradford became the 

5th Oklahoma football player to win the Heisman Trophy, college football’s most coveted and prestigious 

award: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) commends Sam Bradford for his academic and 

athletic accomplishments; 

(2) congratulates Sam Bradford for winning the 

2008 Heisman Trophy; and 

(3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a copy of this resolution to University 
3 

•HRES 60 EH 

of Oklahoma President Boren and Head Football Coach 

Bob Stoops for appropriate display. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Lorenzo Camastro, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

February 8, 1956,

on reargument, May 14, 1956.

*868
      *Harvey E. Kates*for Franceses Camastro and another, as administrators, petitioners.

*Maurice Millimet*for Clara Cimino and another, respondents.

*Leo A. Larkin, Acting Corporation Counsel,*for Henry L. McCarthy, Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York, respondent.

George Frankenthaler, S.

Interest at the rate of 6% per annum is allowed on all surcharges herein except the excess amount of the funeral bill, on which no interest will be allowed. The amount of the settlement with the Department of Welfare of the City of New York is charged against the distributive share of Diana Passalacqua. Costs and disbursements of the object-ants have been taxed, payable out of the estate.

Resubmit decree with computations completed.

(On reargument, May 14, 1956.)

Motion for reargument granted and upon such reargument the court adheres to its original decision. The only issue raised meriting additional consideration concerns the right of the accounting administrators to charge the amount of their settlement with the welfare department against movant’s distributive share.

The estate of a deceased father, having paid a valid claim by the commissioner of welfare for public financial assistance rendered decedent’s adult child and the latter’s minor children during his lifetime, for which the estate was concededly liable (Social Welfare Law, §§ 101,104), may charge this sum against the distributive share of the child *(Matter of McClancy,*182 Misc. 866, affd. 268 App. Div. 876, affd. 294 N. Y. 760; *Matter of Larkin*v. *Larkin,*262 App. Div. 868; see N. Y. City Dom. Rel. Ct. Act, §§ 2, 3). In the instant case the welfare department’s claim for relief payments to decedent’s daughter and her children was compromised with court approval at the hearing, over her objection. Objectant contests the validity of this claim on the ground that her father was not liable, and seeks to charge the amount of the settlement against the entire estate, contending that she is not bound thereby. As the person primarily liable, her relation to the estate is that of principal to surety *(Matter*
      *869
      *of McClancy, supra).*A surety has the right to be indemnified for payments he is compelled to make *(Blanchard*v. *Blanchard,*201 N. Y. 134), and the estate could clearly set off its payment if the welfare department’s claim had been upheld after a trial (e.g., *Matter of Modafferi,*174 Misc. 789). A compromise in open court, giving objectant an opportunity to be heard, approved “for good cause shown ” under section 213 of the Surrogate’s Court Act at a figure amounting to less than one fifth of the city’s original demand, does not deprive this surety of its remedy. The share of the objectant was properly charged with payment of a debt for which she is primarily liable.

Submit order on notice.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Tempe Hospitality Ventures LLC, 

Defendant. 

NO. CV-18-00452-PHX-JJT

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

 Pursuant to Plaintiff having accepted Defendant's offer of judgment, judgment is 

hereby entered against Defendant Tempe Hospitality Ventures LLC as follows: 

ACCESSIBLE PUBLIC SPACES 

Public entrance 

Service animals welcome 

Accessible route from public entrance to registration 

Accessible route from public entrance to guest rooms 

Accessible route from public entrance to restaurant 

Accessible route from public entrance to meeting room/ballroom 

Accessible route from public entrance to fitness center 

Accessible route from public entrance to swimming pool 

Accessible route from public entrance to business center Registration desk 

Restaurant 

Self-parking area for cars 

Self-parking area for vans 

Fitness center 

Swimming pool 

Business center

Case 2:18-cv-00452-JJT Document 15 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ACCESSIBLE GUEST ROOMS 

Bathtubs with grab bars 

Visual fire alarm

Telephone notification device 

Mobility-accessible doors with at least 32 inches of clear door width 

Portable tub seats 

TTY (Text Telephone Device) 

Televisions with closed captioning for the hearing impai red 

Defendant will (within 60 days) communicate the above referenced accessible features to 

all third party booking agents who facilitate online or telephonic reservations for 

Defendant’s hotel. 

Defendant will (within 60 days) modify its policies, practices and procedures to ensure 

that individuals who require mobility and/or ambulatory assistance can make reservations 

for accessible guest rooms during the same hours and in the same manner as individuals 

who do not require mobility and/or ambulatory assistance. 

Defendant shall (within 90 days) identify mobility accessibility features at its hotel that 

do not comply with the 2010 Standards of Accessibility Design and shall, within 12 

months, remove barriers to mobility accessibility to the extent that such removal is 

readily achievable. 

This action is hereby terminated. 

 Brian D. Karth

 District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

May 1, 2018 

s/ Sara L. Quinones

 By Deputy Clerk

Case 2:18-cv-00452-JJT Document 15 Filed 05/01/18 Page 2 of 2
#### Lawrence WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 70379.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 25, 1997.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Christine M. Blegen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14414]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board <SUP>1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 
Stat. 803 (the ICCTA), which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and 
took effect on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce 
Commission (ICC) and transferred certain functions and proceedings 
to the Surface Transportation Board (Board). Section 204(b)(1) of 
the ICCTA provides, in general, that proceedings pending before the 
ICC on the effective date of that legislation shall be decided under 
the law in effect prior to January 1, 1996, insofar as they involve 
functions retained by the ICCTA. This notice relates to a proceeding 
that was pending with the ICC prior to January 1, 1996, and to 
functions that are subject to Board jurisdiction pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. 11323. Therefore, this notice applies the law in effect prior 
to the ICCTA, and citations are to the former sections of the 
statute, unless otherwise indicated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Finance Docket No. 32810]


Douglas M. Head, Kent P. Shoemaker, and Charles H. Clay; 
Continuance in Control Exemption; Minnesota River Bridge Company

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10505, the Board exempts from the prior 
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11343-45 the continuance in control 
by Douglas M. Head, Kent P. Shoemaker, and Charles H. Clay of the 
Minnesota River Bridge Company, subject to standard labor protective 
conditions.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on July 7, 1996. Petitions to 
stay must be filed by June 17, 1996. Petitions to reopen must be filed 
by June 27, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to Finance Docket No. 32810 to: 
(1) Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control 
Branch, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423; and (2) 
Jo A. DeRoche, 1350 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 800, Washington, DC 
20005-4797.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5660. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 2229, Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: 
(202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available 
through TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: May 23, 1996.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Simmons, and 
Commissioner Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14414 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
| (1) | the      Interim Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period      ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange      Commission  (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                         |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                     |   |                         |   |
| Dated:      May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ David      S. Boone |   |
|                     |   | David      S. Boone          |   |
|                     |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |                         |   |

|                     |   |                           |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                     |   |                           |   |
| Dated:      May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Steven      J. Armond |   |
|                     |   | Steven      J. Armond          |   |
|                     |   | Chief      Financial Officer   |   |
|                     |   |                           |   |

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not forany other purpose.
Case 2:17-cr-01519-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01519-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/10/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01519-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/10/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01519-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/10/17 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10.4


                             FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                          INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED
                         INVESTMENT/PROFIT SHARING PLAN



         THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED
INVESTMENT/PROFIT SHARING PLAN (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"), which
Plan was amended and restated in its entirety effective September 26, 1993, and
was subsequently amended by the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Amendments, is
made and entered into by Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the "Employer").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, Section 6.1 of the Plan permits the Employer to amend the Plan
from time to time and Section 6.3 of the Plan permits the Employer to amend the
Plan on behalf of all participating Employers.

         WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan to change the loan
provisions to allow: (1) loans to be made from a Participant's Qualified
Deferral Account, Rollover Account, and Employer Matching Account; and (2) loans
for the purchase of a principal residence to be repaid over a period up to ten
years.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Employer hereby amends the Plan as follows:
SECTION 10.6 B OF THE PLAN IS HEREBY AMENDED BY SUBSTITUTING THE PHRASE
"QUALIFIED DEFERRAL ACCOUNT, ROLLOVER ACCOUNT, OR EMPLOYER MATCHING ACCOUNT" FOR
"QUALIFIED DEFERRAL ACCOUNT" WHEREVER IT APPEARS.

SECTION 10.6F OF THE PLAN IS HEREBY AMENDED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

                  "Each loan shall require that repayment (principal and
                  interest) be amortized in level payments, not less frequently
                  than quarterly. The period of repayment for any loan shall be
                  arrived at by mutual agreement between the Committee and the
                  Borrower. The repayment of any loan, other than a loan for the
                  purchase of the Borrower's principal residence, shall not
                  exceed five (5) years. The repayment of loan for the purchase
                  of the Borrower's principal residence shall not exceed ten
                  (10) years."


                                       1
<PAGE>   2

                  1.       THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT SHALL BE
JANUARY 1, 2000. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED ABOVE, THE PLAN SHALL REMAIN
UNCHANGED AND, AS AMENDED HEREIN, SHALL CONTINUE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ingles Markets, Incorporated has caused this Fifth
Amendment to the Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 6th day
of March, 2000.

                                    EMPLOYER:

                                    INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED


                                    By: /s/ Brenda S. Tudor
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                    Title: Vice President - Finance and
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13656]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PEACE CORPS


Information Collection Requests Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Peace Corps.

ACTION: Notice of public use form review request to the Office of 
Management and Budget.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Associate Director for Management invites comments on 
information collection requests as required pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). This notice announces that the 
Peace Corps has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a 
request to approve the continued use of the National Agency Check 
Questionnaire for Peace Corps Volunteer Background Investigation. 
Section 22 of the Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) mandates 
that ``all persons employed or assigned to duties under the Act shall 
be investigated to insure employment or assignment is consistent with 
national interest in accordance with standards and procedures 
established by the President.'' A copy of the information collection 
may be obtained from Stuart Moran, Office of Volunteer Recruitment and 
Selection, United States PEACE CORPS, 1990 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20526. Mr. Moran may be contacted by telephone at (202) 606-2080. 
Comments on these forms should be addressed to Victoria Becker Wassmer, 
Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, NEOB, Washington, DC 
20503.

Information Collection Abstract

    Title: National Agency Check Questionnaire.
    Need for and Use of This Information: Peace Corps needs this 
information in order to process applicants for Volunteer service. The 
information is used to insure that potential Volunteer's assignment is 
consistent with the national interest in accordance with the standards 
and procedures established by the President.
    Respondents: Individuals who have applied for Peace Corps service 
and have been nominated to a specific program.
    Respondents Obligation To Reply: Required to obtain benefits.
    Burden on the Public:
    a. Annual reporting burden: 2,500 hrs.
    b. Annual record keeping burden: 0 hrs.
    c. Estimated average burden per response: 15 minutes.
    d. Frequency of response: one time.
    e. Estimated number of likely respondents: 10,000.
    f. Estimated cost to respondents: $3.81.

    This notice is issued in Washington, DC on May 28, 1996.
Bessy Kong,
Acting Associate Director for Management.
[FR Doc. 96-13656 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6051-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge: 

 

(a)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(b)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: June 30, 2009

 

/s/  Kevin R. Hoben___________________

 

Kevin R. Hoben

Chief Executive Officer 

 

/s/  Paul J. Kane______________________

 

Paul J. Kane

Chief Financial Officer 

 

This certification is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

 

Page 1
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 23

- 00358

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 96th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No

. 096

- 291939

- 17

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### L

ASKO 

### P RODUCTS



### , LLC

, Appellant

V



### .

M ARIA 

### G. S IFUENTES 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant Lasko Products, Inc. ’ s Motion to Dismiss.”

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T ex. R. A pp. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : May 2, 2024
#### Terry TURNER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65328.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 31, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied March 21, 1995.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ. =

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I JasonMacari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Jason Macari        |           |
|--------------------------|----------------|
| Jason  Macari            | August 9, 2010 |
| Chief  Executive Officer |           |

 

----