UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q





x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010





OR





o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




Commission File No.: 000-53705COPSYNC, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Delaware

98-0513637(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification Number)2010 FM 2673, Canyon Lake, Texas 78133(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)(830) 964-3838Registrant's telephone number, including area code:







Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x Yes   NoIndicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§323.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes   NoIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.




Large accelerated filer  ̈
Accelerated filer  ̈Non-accelerated filer    ̈ (Do not check is a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x





Indicate by check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
oYes  x NoThe number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of August 2, 2010, was 127,347,782 shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value.








COPSYNC, INC.


FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2010









INDEXPART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3Item 1 – Financial Statements
3Item 2 – Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
26Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
28Item 4 – Controls and Procedures
29PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
29Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
29Item 1A – Risk Factors
30Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
30Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
30Item 4 – (Removed and Reserved)
30Item 5 – Other Information
30Item 6 – Exhibits
31SIGNATURES
32








2




COPSYNC, INC.Consolidated Balance SheetsASSETSJune 30,


December 31,2010


2009(Unaudited)CURRENT ASSETSCash and cash equivalents

$
485,318


$
1,141,534Accounts receivable, net


176,271



40,371Prepaid expenses


23,624



14,972Total Current Assets


685,213



1,196,877PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENTComputer hardware


52,363



52,363Computer software


18,259



18,259Fleet vehicles


80,309



77,209Furniture and fixtures


45,832



45,832Total Property and Equipment


196,763



193,663Less: Accumulated Depreciation


(116,424
)


(98,505
)Net Property and Equipment


80,339



95,158OTHER ASSETSSoftware development costs, net


2,416,699



2,345,375Debt issuance costs, net


10,458



16,708Investments


50,000



50,000Lease security deposit


750



750Total Other Assets


2,477,907



2,412,833TOTAL ASSETS

$
3,243,459


$
3,704,868








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 3




COPSYNC, INC.Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYJune 30,


December 31,2010


2009(Unaudited)CURRENT LIABILITIESAccounts payable and accrued expenses

$
389,884


$
508,771Accrued settlement costs


220,000



-Preferred stock dividends payable


73,644



21,690Deferred revenues on hardware, installation, andlicensing contracts, current portion, net of deferred costs


187,968



169,453Convertible notes payable, current portion


-



472,000Notes payable, current portion


13,319



12,551Total Current Liabilities


884,815



1,184,465LONG-TERM LIABILITIESDeferred revenues on hardware, installation, andlicensing contracts


472,233



363,840Convertible notes payable,net of note discount of$27,087 and $46,041, respectively


22,913



13,959Notes payable


27,194



33,733Total Long-Term Liabilities


522,340



411,532Total Liabilities


1,407,155



1,595,997COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYSeries A Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share,100,000 shares authorized; 100,000 shares issuedand outstanding, respectively


10



10Series B Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share,400,000 shares authorized; 375,000 and 362,500 sharesissued and outstanding, respectively


37



36Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share,500,000,000 shares authorized; 127,347,782 and126,086,967 shares issued and outstanding,respectively


12,735



12,609Common stock to be issued, 1,000,000 and 130,885shares, respectively


100,000



19,633Additional paid-in-capital


7,151,081



6,778,430Accumulated deficit


(5,427,559
)


(4,701,847
)Total Stockholders' Equity


1,836,304



2,108,871TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

$
3,243,459


$
3,704,868








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 4




COPSYNC, INC.Consolidated Statements of Operations(Unaudited)For the Three Months Ended


For the Six Months EndedJune 30,


June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009REVENUESHardware, installation and other revenues

$
549,800


$
2,922


$
812,189


$
2,922License fee revenues


74,156



19,201



122,891



23,370Total Revenues


623,956



22,123



935,080



26,292COST OF REVENUESHardware and other costs


317,361



16,217



569,254



19,336Amortization of capitalized licensing costs


44,052



38,386



86,818



74,908Total Cost of Revenues


361,413



54,603



656,072



94,244GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)


262,543



(32,480
)


279,008



(67,952
)OPERATING EXPENSESDepreciation and amortization


9,037



7,942



17,919



15,023Professional fees


175,310



342,403



356,178



372,068Salaries and wages


289,624



109,254



586,882



204,255Rent


8,250



7,700



15,450



16,100Other general and administrative


65,759



71,993



175,727



126,740Total Operating Expenses


547,980



539,292



1,152,156



734,186LOSS BEFORE OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)


(285,437
)


(571,772
)


(873,148
)


(802,138
)OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)Interest income


1,856



146



4,745



613Induced conversion expense


-



-



(4,346
)


-Gain on lawsuit settlement


332,914



-



332,914



-Interest expense


(18,166
)


(26,334
)


(46,164
)


(36,958
)Total Other Income (Expense)


316,604



(26,188
)


287,149



(36,345
)NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES


31,167



(597,960
)


(585,999
)


(838,483
)INCOME TAXES


-



-



-



-NET INCOME (LOSS)

$
31,167


$
(597,960
)

$
(585,999
)

$
(838,483
)Series B preferred stock dividend


(26,178
)


-



(51,954
)


-Beneficial conversion feature on Series B preferred


-



-



(87,759
)


-NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMONSHAREHOLDERS

$
4,989


$
(597,960
)

$
(725,712
)

$
(838,483
)INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC

$
0.00


$
(0.00
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - FULLY DILUTED

$
0.00


$
(0.00
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OFCOMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC


127,347,782



120,303,221



127,177,486



120,288,194WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OFCOMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - FULLY DILUTED


149,972,782



120,303,221



127,177,486



120,288,194






The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 5




COPSYNC, INC.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(Unaudited)For the Six Months EndedJune 30,2010


2009CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet loss

$
(585,999
)

$
(838,483
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


104,737



89,931Beneficial conversion feature


-



9,898Amortization of note discount


18,954



-Induced conversion expense


4,346



-Additional expense for granting of warrants and options


40,759



278,418Issuance of common stock for services rendered


-



29,000Capital contributed through services rendered


42,750



-Gain on lawsuit settlement


(332,914
)


-Change in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable


(135,900
)


(4,762
)Debt issuance costs


6,250



(22,958
)Prepaid expenses


(8,652
)


-Deferred revenues


126,908



178,437Accounts payable and accrued expenses


79,558



37,926Net Cash Used in Operating Activities


(639,203
)


(242,593
)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESSoftware development costs


(158,142
)


(219,104
)Purchases of property and equipment


(3,100
)


(2,016
)Net Cash Used in Investing Activities


(161,242
)


(221,120
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESPayments on notes payable


(5,771
)


(3,993
)Proceeds received on notes and convertible notes


-



260,000Proceeds from common stock to be issued


100,000



120,800Issuance of series B preferred shares for cash


50,000



-Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities


144,229



376,807NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS


(656,216
)


(86,906
)CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD


1,141,534



209,378CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

$
485,318


$
122,472








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 6




COPSYNC, INC.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)(Unaudited)For the Six Months EndedJune 30,2010


2009SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:Cash paid for interest

$
1,657


$
1,821Cash paid for taxes

$
-


$
-NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Common stock issued in lieu of accrued expenses

$
116,665


$
-Common stock issued in conversion of notes payableand accrued interest

$
10,866


$
-Series B Preferred stock dividends declared / accrued

$
139,713


$
-Purchase of fleet vehicles financed by notes payable

$
-


$
24,500








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 7




NOTE 1 -   BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION
 
 The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations.  The information furnished in the interim condensed financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements.  Operating results for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
 
 COPsync, Inc. (“the Company”) operates as a software provider that not only enhances productivity and quality of work, but creates a safer work environment for the public safety community by developing the first real-time, nationwide public safety information sharing network.
  On April 8, 2008, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to implement a 15-for-1 forward stock split. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto have been adjusted accordingly to reflect this forward stock split.  On April 17, 2008, the Company again amended its Certificate of Incorporation to increase its authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 500,000,000, and authorize 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001.  On September 2, 2009, the Certificate of Incorporation was amended again and restated to reduce the number of authorized Series A Preferred Stock to 100,000, to designate the rights and privileges of the Series A Preferred Stock, and to give the Company’s Board of Directors the authority to authorize additional series of preferred stock.  On October 14, 2009, the Certificate of Incorporation was amended again through a Certificate of Designations, authorizing and designating a new series of 400,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
 
 On April 25, 2008, the Company entered into an acquisition agreement with PostInk Technology, LP (“PostInk”) and RSIV, LLC (the general partner of PostInk) to acquire 100% of the ownership interests in PostInk.  On the closing date, the Company issued 25,000,005 shares (post forward stock split) of its common stock, 100,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Shares and warrants to purchase 74,423,069 shares (post forward stock split) of its common stock, in exchange for 100% of PostInk.  The acquisition agreement also called for the cancellation of 29,388,750 shares of common stock held by the Company’s existing stockholders, but only 26,638,750 shares were actually turned over for cancellation.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, an additional 1,000,000 of the remaining shares were recovered by the Company and were cancelled.
 
 The shares issued in the acquisition resulted in the owners of PostInk having operating control of the Company immediately following the acquisition, as the owners of PostInk exercised control over a majority of the Company’s shares.  Therefore, this acquisition has been accounted for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as a reverse acquisition, with PostInk becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.  These consolidated financial statements represent a continuation of PostInk, not COPsync, Inc. (formerly, Global Advance Corporation), the legal parent company.  PostInk is treated as the accounting acquirer for accounting purposes and COPsync, Inc. is the acquirer for legal purposes. The historical financial statements presented are those of PostInk rather than COPsync, Inc. prior to the acquisition and consolidated post acquisition.
 
 Revenue Recognition
 
 The Company applies the revenue recognition provisions pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605.10, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”) (formerly SAB Topic 13A), which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements filed with the SEC.  The guidance outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize the revenue and provides guidance for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies.
 
 The Company's sales arrangements include multiple deliverables as defined in ASC 605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements (“ASC 605-25”) (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables) which typically include computer hardware, hardware installation, license fees, and other miscellaneous revenues related to training and interface development.  Certain transactions have multiple deliverables, with the deliverables clearly defined. To the extent that the secondary deliverables are other than perfunctory, the Company recognizes the revenue on each deliverable, if separable, or on the completion of all deliverables, if not separable, based on the allocation of the deliverables fair value, all in a manner consistent with ASC 605-25.
 
 In general, the Company recognizes revenue related to licensing fees on a monthly basis, over the life of the licensing agreement, and when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
  8
 
 NOTE 2 -
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
 Revenue Recognition (Continued)
 
 In addition, the Company recognizes revenue related to hardware sales, installation of hardware, training, and other related revenue items when the hardware is delivered and installed, and collection is reasonably assured.  Refundable fees are not recognized as revenue until the refund terms have expired.
 
 Per the terms of the hardware sales and licensing agreements, generally the entire amount of the hardware sales, installation charges, other miscellaneous revenues, and license fees are received by the Company at the beginning of the contract, which funds are then used to purchase the related hardware and software needed.  Accordingly, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had received a total of $1,595,281 and $629,616, respectively, of which only $935,080 and $96,323 has been recorded as earned revenue.  The remaining amount of $660,201 and $533,293 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, has been recorded as deferred revenue on hardware, installation and licensing agreements, which will be recognized as revenue once the hardware is installed and over the remaining term of the licensing agreements, as earned.
 
 Loss Per Share
 
 In accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”) (formerly SFAS No. 128), the computations of basic loss per share of common stock are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period of the consolidated financial statements.
 
 The computations of basic and fully diluted loss per share of common stock are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period of the consolidated financial statements, plus the common stock equivalents which would arise from the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding during the period, or the exercise of convertible debentures.  Common stock equivalents, totaling 250,000 shares pursuant to the convertible debentures, 4,125,000 shares pursuant to outstanding warrants, 3,150,000 pursuant to employee options, and 15,100,000 shares pursuant to the conversion of preferred shares as of June 30, 2010, have not been included because they are anti-dilutive.
 
 Following is a reconciliation of the loss per share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
  For the Three Months EndedJune 30,2010


2009Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

$
31,167


$
(597,960
)Series B Preferred stock dividends


(26,178
)


-$
4,989


$
(597,960
)Weighted average shares - basic


127,347,782



120,303,221Weighted average shares - fully diluted


149,972,782



120,303,221Basic income (loss) per share

$
0.00


$
(0.00
)Fully diluted income (loss) per share

$
0.00


$
(0.00
)
   9




NOTE 2 -
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


Loss Per Share (Continued)


For the Six Months EndedJune 30,2010


2009Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

$
(585,999
)

$
(838,483
)Series B Preferred stock dividends and beneficial feature recorded


(139,713
)


-$
(725,712
)

$
(838,483
)Weighted average shares - basic


127,177,486



120,288,194Weighted average shares - fully diluted


127,177,486



120,288,194Basic income (loss) per share

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)Fully diluted income (loss) per share

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)
  Income Taxes
 
 The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) (formerly SFAS No. 109).  Under this accounting standard, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the bases of certain assets and liabilities for income tax and financial reporting purposes.  The deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified according to the financial statement classification of the assets and liabilities generating the differences. The Company maintains a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets.
 
 ASC 740 requires a company to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based upon the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not threshold is met, a company must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in the consolidated financial statements. As a result of the implementation of ASC 740, the Company performed a review of its material tax positions in accordance with and measurement standards established by ASC 740. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefit which would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. There has been no significant change in the unrecognized tax benefit through June 30, 2010.  The Company also estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will not change significantly within the next twelve months.
 
 The Company establishes a valuation allowance based upon the potential likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset and taking into consideration the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the current period.  Future realization of the deferred tax benefit depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period under the Federal tax laws.
 
 Changes in circumstances, such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset.  Any change in the valuation allowance will be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.
 
 There are no tax positions included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009 for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility.  Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.
 
 As the Company has significant net operating loss carry forwards, even if certain of the Company’s tax positions were disallowed, it is not foreseen that the Company would have to pay any taxes in the near future.  Consequently, the Company does not calculate the impact of interest or penalties on amounts that might be disallowed.
   10
 
 NOTE 2 -
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
 Income Taxes (Continued)
 
 The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and Texas jurisdictions.  Tax years 2008 to current remain open to examination by U.S. federal and state tax authorities.
 
 From inception through December 31, 2009, the Company had incurred net losses and, therefore, had no tax liability.  The net deferred tax asset generated by the loss carryforward has been fully reserved.  The cumulative net operating loss carryforward is approximately $3,670,000 at December 31, 2009, and will expire in the years 2026 through 2029.
 
 Software Development Costs
 
 The Company capitalizes software development costs in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 985, Accounting for Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed (“ASC 985”) (formerly SFAS No. 86) under which certain software development costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility may be capitalized and amortized over the estimated lives of the related products.
  The Company determines technological feasibility to be established upon completion of (1) product design, (2) detail program design, (3) consistency between product and program design and (4) review of detail program design to ensure that high risk development issues have been resolved. Upon the general release of the product to customers, development costs for that product are amortized over fifteen years, based on management’s estimated economic life of the product.
  Software Development Costs
 Software development costs as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, are as follows:
  June 30,

2010


December 31,

2009(Unaudited)Capitalized software development costs

$
2,724,082


$
2,565,940Accumulated amortization


(307,383
)


(220,565
)Total

$
2,416,699


$
2,345,375
  Amortization expense related to these costs was $86,818 and $74,908 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company has not recorded any impairments on the capitalized software developments costs as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
 
 Concentrations of Risk - Major Supplier
 
 Approximately 94% of the Company’s cost of revenues – hardware costs for the six months ended June 30, 2010 relates to hardware purchased from a single supplier.  The Company could be adversely affected by the termination of this supplier relationship, although management of the Company believes that there are other vendors available to supply the Company if this were to happen.
 
 Concentrations of Risk - Governmental Constraints
 
 A significant portion of the Company’s revenues are generated through police and sheriff departments that are subject to governmental budget processes.  The Company may be adversely affected by possible governmental budget cuts and/or economic instability.  The effect of these factors, however, cannot be accurately predicted.
 
 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
 The Company has adopted ASC 820-10-50, Fair Value Measurements. This guidance defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows: Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.  Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.  Level 3 inputs to valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement.
  11
  NOTE 2 -
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
 Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
 
 The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 for the cash and cash equivalents, and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest.  The carrying value of notes payable approximates fair value because negotiated terms and conditions are consistent with current market rates as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
 
 Preferred Stock Issuances with Beneficial Conversion Features
 
 In accordance with ASC 470-20-30, the Company uses the effective conversion price of preferred shares issued based on the proceeds received to compute the intrinsic value of the embedded conversion feature on preferred stock issuances with detachable warrants.  The Company allocated the proceeds received from the Series B Preferred stock issuance and the detachable warrants included in the exchange on a relative fair value basis.  The Company then calculated an effective conversion price and used that price to measure the intrinsic value of the embedded conversion option.  The Series B Preferred shares may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 40-to-1.  The detachable warrants are exercisable at $0.20 per share.
 
 NOTE 3 -        CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
 
 During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received a total of $420,000 from a related individual pursuant to convertible notes payable.  The notes bore interest at 9% per annum, were due on demand, and were convertible into common stock at $0.05 per share.  As more fully described in Note 9, pursuant to a “Deal Points Settlement Agreement” effective June 6, 2010, the Company and this related individual agreed to discharge these $420,000 convertible notes payable and accrued interest totaling $76,740 in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  However, this $420,000, along with a separate $52,000 convertible note payable as discussed below (for a total of $472,000 in principal), plus accrued interest, shall be payable to the note holder if and when certain events occur.  (These required events are described in Note 9).  Since management believes that the likelihood of these events occurring is remote, the Company has not recorded this liability as of June 30, 2010, but rather recorded a gain related to this settlement.  However, if the events described in Note 9 occur, the Company will be obligated to repay the $472,000, plus accrued interest, in full.
 
 During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company received a total of $362,000 from unrelated individuals pursuant to convertible notes payable.  These notes bear interest at rates between 2.5% and 10% per annum, are due between March 31, 2011 and July 23, 2011, with one due on demand, and are convertible into common stock at either $0.10 or $0.20 per share.
 
   12
 
 NOTE 3 -
CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (Continued)
  During the year ended December 31, 2009, $266,730 ($250,000 in principal and $16,730 in interest) of these convertible notes was converted into 2,667,300 shares of common stock, due to an agreement from the Company to induce the note holders to convert.  During the six months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $10,866 ($10,000 in principal and $866 in interest) was converted into 108,660 shares of common stock, with the same agreement from the Company to induce the note holder to convert.  These inducements allowed the notes to convert at $0.10 per share, rather than the stated conversion price of $0.20 per share, thus creating an induced conversion expense of $4,346 and $106,692 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
 
 As discussed above, pursuant to a “Deal Points Settlement Agreement” effective June 6, 2010, the Company and one of these note holders agreed to discharge a $52,000 convertible note payable and accrued interest totaling $4,174, along with a separate note in the amount of $420,000 (as described above), plus accrued interest, in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to repayment based upon certain criteria as described above.
 The convertible notes have been accounted for pursuant to ASC 470, Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratio (formerly EITF Issue No. 98-5), and ASC 470, Application of EITF Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments (formerly EITF Issue No. 00-27).  Pursuant to the terms of the convertible note received in 2008, no beneficial conversion feature was recorded.  However, pursuant to the terms of the new convertible notes received during 2009, a beneficial conversion feature was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009, totaling $260,000, which is amortized over the term of the notes, or two years, except for one note where the entire discount was recorded as interest expense on the date of the note because the note has no determined maturity date.  However, since certain of these notes were converted into common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, the remaining discount on these notes was fully amortized.  The unamortized note discount on the remaining $50,000 in convertible notes payable as of June 30, 2010 is $27,087.
   Convertible notes payable are summarized as follows:Total convertible notes payable

$
50,000Less: unamortized note discount


(27,087
)Convertible notes payable, net


22,913Less: current portion


-Convertible notes payable, net, long-term portion

$
22,913
   13




NOTE 4 -       PREFERRED STOCK
 
 Pursuant to the acquisition agreement previously discussed in Note 1, the Company issued a total of 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  After the designations of that series was established by amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, each share of Series A Preferred Stock is now convertible into one share of common stock, but has voting rights on a basis of 750 votes per share.
 
 During 2009, the Company completed a private placement of its equity securities in which the Company raised an additional $1,450,000 in gross proceeds.  During the six months ended June 30, 2010, an additional $50,000 was raised.  Pursuant to these private placements, the Company issued 375,000 shares of the Company’s newly designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into a total of 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  In addition, as part of the private placement, the Company granted warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock.
 
 The Series B preferred stock and the warrants were sold as a unit, with each investor receiving eight warrants to purchase one share of common stock for every share of Series B stock purchased.  The purchase price for each unit was $4.00 per share of Series B stock purchased.
 
 In accordance with ASC 470-20-30, the Company uses the effective conversion price of preferred shares issued based on the proceeds received to compute the intrinsic value of the embedded conversion feature on preferred stock issuances with detachable warrants.  The Company allocated the proceeds received from the Series B Preferred stock issuance and the detachable warrants included in the exchange on a relative fair value basis.  The Company then calculated an effective conversion price and used that price to measure the intrinsic value of the embedded conversion option.  During 2009, as a result of this calculation, the Company recorded a discount on this Series B preferred stock issuance, totaling $522,950, based on the beneficial conversion feature and the valuation of the 2,900,000 warrants granted.  This discount is being amortized over the earliest conversion period, which is 90 days.  An additional discount was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2010 of $18,033 as a result of the beneficial conversion feature on the additional 12,500 shares of preferred stock issued, along with the valuation of the additional 100,000 warrants granted.  This discount is being amortized over the earliest conversion period, which is also 90 days.  Accordingly, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded accretion of these discounts (recorded as a Series B preferred stock deemed dividend from the beneficial conversion feature), totaling $87,759 and $453,224, respectively.
  The 3,000,000 warrants granted have an exercise price of $0.20 per share and expire on October 14, 2011.  The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the warrants are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to: i) stock dividends, stock splits or reverse stock splits; ii) the payment of dividends on the common stock payable in shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock; iii) a recapitalization, reorganization or reclassification involving the common stock, or a consolidation or merger of the Company; or iv) a liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
   14
  NOTE 4 -
PREFERRED STOCK (Continued)
  Also in connection with the private placements, the Company agreed to use its best efforts to effect a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission registering the resale of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and upon exercise of the warrants, upon the request of the holders of a majority of those shares after the second anniversary of the date of the private placement closing.  It also provides for the investors to have “piggyback” registration rights to include their shares in future registrations with the SEC by the Company of the issuance or sale of its securities.  An investor’s right to request a registration or inclusion of shares in a registration terminates on the date that such investor may immediately sell all of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and upon exercise of the warrants held by such investor under Rule 144 or Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities Act.  The agreement also grants to the investors a right of first refusal to purchase all, but not less than all, of certain new securities the Company may, from time to time, propose to sell after the date of the private placement agreement, and also contains certain covenants relating to the Company’s Board of Directors and requiring the Company to retain patent counsel.
 
 The newly designated Series B Preferred Stock issued in this private placement will i) accrue dividends at a rate of 7.0% per annum, payable in preference to the common stock or any other capital stock of the Company, ii) will have a preference in liquidation, or deemed liquidation, to receive the initial investment in the Series B Stock, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, iii) is convertible into 40 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for issuances by the Company of common stock less than $0.10 per share, and iv) has the right to elect one member of the Company’s Board of Directors.  The Company has recorded accrued dividends as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 of $73,644 and $21,690, respectively, on the Series B Preferred Stock.
 
 NOTE 5 -        OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
 
 As previously discussed, the Company granted warrants to purchase 15,000,000 shares of its common stock to an individual in conjunction with the acquisition agreement, which warrants are exercisable at $0.05 per share, and expire on April 1, 2012.  Pursuant to a “Deal Points Settlement Agreement” effective June 6, 2010, as more fully discussed in Note 9, these 15,000,000 warrants were cancelled in lieu of the Company’s obligation to issue the warrant holder 1,000,000 shares of common stock in exchange for the warrants.
 
 In addition, pursuant to certain private placements at $0.40 per share, the Company also granted warrants to purchase a total of 264,800 shares of common stock to the investors, exercisable at $0.60 per share, which expired on March 1, 2010.  The Company estimates the fair value of each stock award at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model pursuant to ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (ASC 718), (formerly SFAS No. 123R), which model requires the use of exercise behavior data and the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the Company’s stock price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate, and the weighted average expected life of the warrants.  Because the Company does not pay dividends, the dividend rate variable in the Black-Scholes model is zero.  Under the provisions of ASC 718, no value was assigned to the warrants granted, thus no additional expense was recorded under the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
 
 During 2009, pursuant to certain advisory agreements, the Company granted warrants to purchase a total of 875,000 shares of common stock to two separate advisory firms, exercisable at either $0.10 or $0.20 per share, which expire between June 17, 2012 and June 5, 2014.
 
 Under the provisions of ASC 718, values between $0.30 and $0.60 per warrant share were assigned to the warrants granted, thus an additional expense of $12,458 was recorded under the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
 
 During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted warrants to purchase a total of 250,000 shares of common stock to an individual in conjunction with a subscription agreement.  These warrants are exercisable at $0.20 per share and expire on June 7, 2011.
   15
 NOTE 5 -        OUTSTANDING WARRANTS (Continued)
 
 As previously discussed in Note 4 above, the Company also granted warrants to purchase an additional 3,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to various private placements.  These warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 per share and expire on October 14, 2011.
 
 A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2010 and the changes during the six months then ended is presented below:
  Weighted AverageShares


Exercise PriceOutstanding, December 31, 2009


19,039,800


$
0.10Granted


350,000



0.20Exercised / Expired / Cancelled


(15,264,800
)


0.06Outstanding, June 30, 2010


4,125,000


$
0.20Exercisable, June 30, 2010


4,125,000


$
0.20
  As of June 30, 2010, the following warrants were outstanding:
  Warrants


Exercise Price

Termination Dates3,000,000


$
0.20

October 14, 2011425,000


$
0.20

March 2, 2014400,000


$
0.20

June 17, 201250,000


$
0.10

June 5, 2014250,000


$
0.20

June 7, 20114,125,000


16
    The following is a summary of outstanding and exercisable warrants at June 30, 2010:
  
 Outstanding


ExercisableWeightedAverage





Weighted





WeightedNumber


Remaining


Average


Number


AverageExercise


Outstanding


Contractual


Exercise


Exercisable


ExercisePrices


at 06/30/10


Life (in yrs.)


Price


at 06/30/10


Price0.20



3,000,000



1.29



0.20



3,000,000



0.200.20



425,000



3.67



0.20



425,000



0.200.20



400,000



1.97



0.20



400,000



0.200.10



50,000



3.93



0.10



50,000



0.100.20



250,000



0.94



0.20



250,000



0.20$
0.10 - 0.20



4,125,000



1.61


$
0.20



4,125,000


$
0.20
  NOTE 6 -       ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
 
 During 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with an advisory firm to assist the Company in raising additional capital.  Per the terms of the agreement, the advisory firm will receive a finder’s fee of $100,000 for the first phase of financing (up to $1,000,000), and $200,000 for the second phase of financing (up to $2,000,000).  In addition, the advisory firm is to receive warrants to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock (done in tranches, based upon capital raised) at $0.20 per share for a five-year period, with anti-dilution protection, and a cashless exercise feature.
 
 Pursuant to this advisory firm agreement, the Company has paid a total of $25,000 of the $100,000 finder’s fee through June 30, 2010, as the advisory firm has raised $250,000 in convertible debt out of the maximum of $1,000,000 first phase, or 25%.  No additional finder’s fees are owed until additional financing is obtained.  In addition, the Company granted warrants to purchase 425,000 of the 5,000,000 shares of common stock to the advisory firm during 2009, based upon the amount of capital raised.  No additional warrants are owed pursuant to this agreement as of June 30, 2010, until additional financing is obtained.  Also during 2009, the Company granted the same advisory firm, pursuant to a separate agreement, warrants to purchase a total of 400,000 shares of common stock, out of warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under that agreement, at $0.20 per share, for a three year period, for advisory services.
 
 Also during 2009, the Company entered into a twelve-month agreement with a separate advisory firm to assist the Company in corporate planning, structure and capital resources.  Per the terms of the agreement, the advisory firm will receive a consulting fee of $5,000 per month with $5,000 payable on the execution of the agreement and $55,000 being deferred until such time as the Company feels it can afford to pay the monthly retainer, or the Company raises $1,500,000 or more in debt or equity during the term of the agreement, or the Company received $500,000 in revenue, but no later than on the date of termination or cancellation of the agreement.  In addition, the advisory firm is to receive 75,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $45,000, or $0.60 per share, which amount is being expensed over the twelve-month contract at $3,750 per month.
   17
  NOTE 6 -       ADVISORY AGREEMENTS (Continued)
 In addition, the advisory firm received warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share for a five-year period, with a cashless exercise feature.  These warrants were valued at $29,898 or $0.60 per warrant share.  This expense is also being recognized over the twelve month contract at $2,491 per month.  The advisory firm will also receive $50,000 if the Company receives $1,500,000 in revenue or raises $1,500,000 in debt or equity during the term of the agreement.  Also pursuant to the original agreement, the advisory firm was also to receive warrants to purchase 1,250,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share for a seven-year period, with a cashless exercise feature, subject to the advisory firm satisfying certain criteria.  However, subsequent to June 30, 2010, this portion of the advisory agreement related to the eventual grant of 1,250,000 warrants was cancelled pursuant to an addendum to the original agreement.  See also Note 11 for further details regarding an additional addendum to this original agreement.
 
 NOTE 7 -       COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS
 
 During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued a total of 1,021,270 shares of common stock to two separate employees for services rendered during 2009 valued at $116,665, previously accrued at December 31, 2009.  The Company also issued a total of 130,885 shares of common stock for cash proceeds received during 2009 totaling $19,633.
  In addition, the Company issued 108,660 shares of common stock, as previously discussed in Note 3, to an individual in conversion of convertible notes payable and accrued interest totaling $10,866, convertible at $0.10 per share.  This convertible note payable was originally convertible at $0.20 per share, rather than the $0.10 per share.  Accordingly, on the date of conversion, the Company recorded an additional expense of $4,346 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 as an induced conversion expense.
  The Company also recorded contributed capital of $42,750 related to the forfeiture of contractual payroll by certain corporate officers during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
  During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company also received a total of $100,000 pursuant to a subscription agreement received for 1,000,000 shares to be issued at $0.10 per share.  This investor was also granted a total of 250,000 warrants to purchase common stock as part of the subscription agreement, exercisable at $0.20 per share until June 7, 2011.  The shares are expected to be issued during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
   18
  NOTE 8 -        EMPLOYEE OPTIONS
 
 Effective December 16, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors granted certain employees options to purchase a total of 3,150,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $0.09 per share, the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the options were granted, which expire on December 15, 2019.  These options vest 100% in sixty equal monthly installments, beginning one month after the date of grant.  As previously discussed, the Company estimates the fair value of each stock award at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model pursuant to ASC 718, which model requires the use of exercise behavior data and the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the Company’s stock price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate, and the weighted average expected life of the warrants.  Because the Company does not pay dividends, the dividend rate variable in the Black-Scholes model is zero.  Under the provisions of ASC 718, a value of $0.09 per option share was assigned to the options granted, however, since none of the options were vested as of December 31, 2009, no expense related to these options was recorded under the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 However, additional expense of $28,302 was recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2010, which represents the value of the options that vested during that period. Additional expense of $254,701 will be expensed over the next five years, or $56,601 per year, as the options become vested.
 
 During 2009, the Company estimated the fair value of the stock options based on the following weighted average assumptions:
   Risk-free interest rate


3.61
%Expected life

10 yearsExpected volatility


194
%Dividend yield


0.00
%
  A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding options as of June 30, 2010 and the changes during the six months then ended is presented below:
 Weighted AverageShares


Exercise PriceOutstanding, December 31, 2009


3,150,000


$
0.09Granted


-



n/aExercised / Expired / Cancelled


-



n/aOutstanding, June 30, 2010


3,150,000


$
0.09Exercisable, June 30, 2010


-


$
-
 
 19
  NOTE 8 -        EMPLOYEE OPTIONS (Continued)
 The following is a summary of outstanding and exercisable employee options at June 30, 2010:
  Outstanding


ExercisableWeightedAverage





Weighted





WeightedNumber


Remaining


Average


Number


AverageExercise


Outstanding


Contractual


Exercise


Exercisable


ExercisePrices


at 06/30/10


Life (in yrs.)


Price


at 06/30/10


Price$
0.09



3,150,000



9.47


$
0.09



-



n/a
  NOTE 9 -       COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
 Contingent Liability
 
 In October 2009, Rocket City Enterprises, Inc. (“RCTY”) filed a demand against the Company in the American Arbitration Association in San Antonio, Texas. The demand alleges breach of contract and seeks repayment of a purported loan in the amount of $200,000 plus interest at 9% per annum.  RCTY has remitted the filing fee of $1,000, and the arbitration is proceeding.  On February 12, 2010, RCTY filed an amended demand to include a claim for unjust enrichment.  On February 26, 2010, the Company filed an Answering Statement generally denying the allegations and asserting various affirmative defenses, including fraudulent inducement.  The arbitration hearing in this matter is scheduled to begin on November 2, 2010.  The Company intends to defend itself vigorously.  Specifically, the Company intends to deny that RCTY has alleged a valid debt of the Company based on RCTY’s representations to the Company that the $200,000 was only to be repaid upon the fulfillment of certain conditions that never occurred.  The Company intends to assert affirmative defenses for, inter alia, fraudulent inducement.
 
 At December 31, 2008, pursuant to the Company’s belief that the amount was not intended to be repaid, the Company recorded the $200,000 as additional equity.  However, in order to be conservative at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has reclassified this $200,000 as a liability, pending the outcome of this proceeding.
 
 Employment Agreements
  Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
  Effective April 29, 2009, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with an employee of the Company to be its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) through December 15, 2015, replacing the employment agreement the employee previously had with PostInk, at a base salary of not less than $160,000 per annum.
   20
  NOTE 9 -        COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
  Chief Executive Officer (CEO) (Continued)
 The employee has agreed to forego the salary increase as noted above, until such time that the Company is profitable or sufficient funding is raised to sustain the Company as a viable ongoing concern.  Accordingly, the Company recorded contributed capital of $20,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to the foregone salary increase.
  President
  Effective April 29, 2009, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with an employee of the Company to be its President, through December 31, 2015, replacing the employment agreement the employee previously had with PostInk, at a base salary of not less than $115,000 per annum through March 31, 2010, increasing to $130,000 per annum after April 1, 2010.
  The employee has agreed to forego the salary increase as noted above, until such time that the Company is profitable or sufficient funding is raised to sustain the Company as a viable ongoing concern.  Accordingly, the Company recorded contributed capital of $22,750 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to the foregone salary increase.
  Executive Vice-President of Sales and Marketing
  Effective September 15, 2009, the Company entered into an employment agreement with an employee of the Company to be its Executive Vice-President of Sales and Marketing, continuing until October 12, 2014, at a base salary of not less than $220,000 per annum, payable in cash of $150,000 and $70,000 per year in shares of restricted common stock.  The shares will accumulate monthly, based upon the average trading price of the Company’s common stock during such month, and will be payable to the employee on the earlier to occur of i) September 15, 2010, or ii) the date on which the Company has reported net income in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, for two consecutive quarters.  The Company has accrued a total of $55,417 as of June 30, 2010 related to the amount of shares that have vested through June 30, 2010, pursuant to the $70,000 worth of shares to eventually be issued during 2010.
  In addition, on or about October 12, 2009, the Company was obligated to grant to the employee a total of 750,000 shares of restricted common stock under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan, which shares will vest in twenty (20) equal quarterly installments of 37,500 shares each, beginning January 12, 2010.  As no shares have vested through December 31, 2009, no accrual has been recorded as of December 31, 2009 pursuant to these shares.  However, an accrual of $9,750 was recorded as of June 30, 2010 for the installment that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
 21
  NOTE 9 -       COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
 
 Employment Agreements (Continued)
  Executive Vice-President of Sales and Marketing(Continued)
  Finally, under the employment agreement, on or about October 12, 2009, the Company was obligated to pay the employee $20,000 in cash and 551,270 fully-vested shares of restricted common stock under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan.  Such payments were for full compensation for services provided by the employee from April 15, 2009 through September 15, 2009.  These shares were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
 
 Other Agreements
  Effective May 28, 2010, the Company entered into a “Referral Compensation Agreement” with an investment firm.  Pursuant to this agreement, the investment firm has or will facilitate meetings and introductions on behalf of the Company with certain potential investors in return for the Company’s agreement to pay the investment firm compensation for these introductory services if an investment, either directly or indirectly, results as a consequence of these services.  The investment firm is entitled to a 5% finder’s fee of the proceeds or value invested in the Company within one-year after the date of the agreement.  However, the investment firm will not be entitled to any compensation under this agreement for any investment in the Company that is used by the Company to pay the investment firm the monthly retainer required in the “Professional Services Agreement” noted below.
  Effective June 2, 2010, the Company entered into a one-year “Professional Services Agreement” with this same investment firm.  Pursuant to this separate agreement, the investment firm is to provide government relations and consulting services, sales services and tech support.  As consideration for these services, the investment firm is entitled to a monthly retainer payment of $30,000.  Such payments are contingent upon receipt by the Company of investments that the Company is able to secure, with the assistance of the investment firm, for that purpose, up to an amount of $360,000 for the initial term of the agreement.  In addition to the monthly retainer payment, the investment firm will be entitled to a commission equal to amounts actually received by the Company in excess of $49.95 per user, per month generated from any contract secured as a result of the investment firm’s efforts.
  Office Leases
  The Company currently has two separate operating leases for its office space.  Both leases currently are on a month-to-month basis.  Each lease requires a monthly payment of $1,200 per month, and can be terminated by either party at any time.  One of the leases is with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (see Note 10).
   22
  NOTE 9 -       COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
 Litigation
  On December 4, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit against an individual and various entities that the Company believes are affiliated with and controlled by this individual who held convertible notes payable by the Company in the amount of $472,000 (see Note 3), in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, captioned COPsync, Inc., Russell Chaney, individually, Jason S. Rapp, individually, v. Timothy T. Page, et. al.  In the lawsuit, the Company and the other individual plaintiffs (Russell Chaney and Jason Rapp) were seeking damages for federal securities law violations, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, conversion, breach of contract and other common law violations arising from the defendants’ wrongful acts in connection with trading the Company’s securities and promoting and raising capital for the Company in relation to the share exchange transaction with the Company’s predecessor.  Management of the Company believes that Mr. Page, through the other defendant entities, controlled a large majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock prior to that transaction, and acted as the Company’s promoter and fiduciary in that and related transactions.
  On December 30, 2009, Mr. Page and several of the other defendants answered the lawsuit, asserting various affirmative defenses and filing counterclaims against the Company and the other plaintiffs for business disparagement, based upon alleged communications between the Company and a broker-dealer, and fraudulent inducement, in connection with alleged loans made to the Company by Testre LP.  On January 22, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims, which is now awaiting court decision.  Management of the Company believes that the counterclaims are without merit and intend to defend them vigorously.
  Also on December 30, 2009, Testre issued a letter demanding payment in thirty (30) days of alleged loans made to the Company in the amount of $1,182,000.  Of that amount, a $750,000 purported loan was allegedly due to be converted into warrants to purchase 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon the closing of the April 2008 share exchange.  The Company has always believed that the $750,000 loan was never a legitimate obligation, and has disputed that it owed any monies on these supposed loans, in part because Testre and its affiliates, including Mr. Page, have caused damages to the Company substantially in excess of these amounts.  On March 20, 2010, Testre filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, captioned Testre, LP vs. COPsync, Inc., alleging breach of contract and seeking $1,389,656 in principal and interest allegedly due on the above-referenced loans. The Company had recorded, however, total convertible notes payable to this individual and Testre LP, totaling $472,000 (see Note 3) as of December 31, 2009, in order to be conservative, pending the outcome of this litigation, but believed that the $472,000 amount was the worst-case scenario based upon the loan documents.
   23
  NOTE 9 -        COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
 
 Litigation (Continued)
  Effective June 6, 2010, the Company and Mr. Page (personally and on behalf of Testre and its affiliates) entered into a “Deal Points Settlement Agreement” (“DPSA”) which according to the agreement is intended to be enforceable as a binding settlement agreement in and of itself as necessary, although a final settlement agreement has not been finalized as of the date of this report.  Pursuant to this DPSA, both parties agreed to the following: (1) the $750,000 purported loan noted in the preceding paragraph is null, void, and unenforceable and the Company is not subject to any repayment or guaranty obligations arising therefrom, and (2) any alleged obligation under the convertible notes payable, totaling $472,000, plus accrued interest totaling $80,914 (see Note 3), shall be discharged, and shall not be recognized as indebtedness against the Company.  However, the Company agrees to pay a settlement sum to Page and Testre in the amount of $472,000, plus accrued interest, if and when the following conditions are satisfied: (a) to the extent that new capital is introduced to the Company by Mr. Page or a certain other individual on terms acceptable to the Company and that comply with all applicable state and federal security laws, the Company shall pay 45% of such funds to Mr. Page or any other person or entity designated by Mr. Page, (b) the Company will not refuse to issue its equity securities to any investors introduced by Mr. Page or a certain other individual provided that the investors shall be accredited investors and willing to purchase the Company’s equity securities on terms no less favorable to the Company that those of its most recent offering of similar securities, and provided further that the Company shall advise Mr. Page immediately if it offers equity securities on any more favorable terms to any prospective investor and shall not refuse any investors introduced by Mr. Page who are willing to purchase shares on such more favorable terms, and (c) the total and maximum amount to be paid to Mr. Page under all provisions is $472,000, plus accrued interest, from the dates stated and at the rates stated in the underlying notes.
  In satisfaction of the discharge of these convertible notes payable, the Company will deliver 1,000,000 restricted shares to Mr. Page upon the signing of the final settlement agreement.  In addition, the Company will convey to Testre 1,000,000 shares of unrestricted common stock in exchange for Testre’s warrants to purchase 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  At the time a full settlement agreement is finalized, the Company will convey the shares to Testre.  Following the execution of a full settlement agreement, the Company will not interfere with the sale of the Company’s stock by the defendants either through requesting action or inaction by their transfer agent or by contacting any brokerage firms at which the Page defendants have an account.  In addition, all parties will dismiss all claims and counterclaims with prejudice in the two pending lawsuits referenced above promptly after a final settlement agreement is signed.  The DFSA stipulated that all parties were to finalize and sign a full and final settlement agreement with mutual releases and ordinary and customary terms by June 15, 2010, although a final settlement agreement has yet to be signed as of the date of this report.  If there is any dispute about any point in the final settlement agreement on which the parties cannot agree, the parties will ask a disinterested attorney to decide the issue on the basis of what is ordinary and customary under Texas and federal practice, but the points in this DPSA will not be altered or otherwise affected.
    24
  NOTE 9 -        COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
 
 Litigation (Continued)
 As of the date of this report, a final settlement agreement as referred to in the previous paragraph has yet to be finalized.  However, according to the language included in the DPSA, the agreement is intended to be enforceable as a binding settlement agreement in and of itself, as of June 6, 2010.  Accordingly, the Company has recorded accrued settlement costs of $220,000 as of June 30, 2010, which represents the market value of the 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to the DPSA on June 6, 2010 ($0.11 per share), since no shares have been issued pursuant to this agreement as of June 30, 2010.  The difference between this accrual and the discharge of the convertible notes payable and related accrued interest through June 6, 2010 (see Note 3) has been recorded as a lawsuit settlement gain, totaling $332,914, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010.  This gain has been recorded since management of the Company believes that the eventual payment of the $472,000, plus accrued interest, settlement amount as discussed previously, is considered to be remote pending the unlikely occurrence of the required stipulations as previously discussed.
  NOTE 10 -      RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
  The Company leases its corporate office space on a month-to-month basis from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  The monthly payment on the lease agreement is $1,200 per month and the agreement can be terminated by either party at any time.
 
 NOTE 11 -      SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
 Effective July 16, 2010, pursuant to an addendum to a consulting agreement (see Note 6, paragraphs 3 and 4, for details of the original consulting agreement), both the Company and the advisory firm agreed to terminate the clause regarding the granting of 1,250,000 warrants.  However, effective the same day, pursuant to an additional addendum to the same consulting agreement, both parties agreed to add an additional clause to the original agreement, whereby the advisory firm is to receive warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share for a seven-year period, with a cashless exercise feature, subject to the terms of the consulting agreement. as amended.  These warrants have not yet been issued.
  The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date that the financial statements were available to be issued and found no other significant subsequent events that required additional disclosure.
  25
 Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
 This report contains “forward-looking statements.”  All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including:  any projections of earnings, revenues or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new products, services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.  Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan” or “anticipate” and other similar words.
 
 Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed.  Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and to inherent risks and uncertainties, such as those disclosed in this report.  We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement.
 
 You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, including the notes to those financial statements, included elsewhere in this report.
  The information contained below is subject to the “Risk Factors” and other risks detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Overview; Business Model; Risks and Uncertainties
  Since January 2005, we have primarily been a vendor of the COPsyncTM service, which is a real-time data collection and data sharing solution.  Our solution provides in-car, real-time, law enforcement information to law enforcement officers at the point of incident via a laptop computer, notebook or a handheld device.  Our service also provides electronic forms capability to enable officers in the field to electronically document incident and offense reports, including arrests, citations, field contacts, DWI reporting, and crash reporting; it also provides a means to electronically transmit missing child (Amber) and BOLO (Be on the lookout) alerts to other users of the service and electronic alerts to aid in the identification and apprehension of persons of interest to law enforcement.
 
 Our founders, Russell Chaney and Jason Shane Rapp, both certified police officers in the State of Texas and former software company executives, began developing the COPsync service in early 2004.  Their motivation for developing the service was the death of a fellow police officer in their community, which they believed was the direct result of law enforcement agencies not sharing relevant information.  Mr. Chaney and Mr. Rapp aspired to create and deploy a technology that would have avoided the death of a fellow officer and that provides in-vehicle, electronic technology tools to assist officers in fulfilling their law enforcement responsibilities.
 
 We believe that use of our system saves lives, saves time and saves money.  It increases officer safety by providing real-time access to critical information officers need to protect themselves and the public.  Also, our systems’ electronic technology tools increase officer productivity, which enables them to spend more time on patrol and less time behind a desk completing incident, offense and activity  paperwork.  Our system architecture is designed to scale nationwide and globally.  We have also designed our system to be “vendor neutral,” meaning it can be used with products and services offered by other law enforcement technology vendors.
 
 Our service became available for release in the second half of 2008, and we began generating license fee revenue in the fourth quarter of 2008.  Currently, 126 law enforcement agencies have contractually subscribed to use our real-time data collection and data sharing solution.
 
 We offer our software as a service (“SaaS”) on a subscription basis to our customers who subscribe to use the services for a specified term.  The fees are typically paid annually at the inception of each year of service.  Our business model is to obtain subscribers to use our service, achieve a high subscription renewal rate from those subscribers and then grow our revenue via a combination of new subscribers and renewals of existing subscribers.  Pertinent attributes of our model include the following:
 
 ·
We incur start-up costs and recurring fixed costs to establish and maintain the service.
 ·
We acquire subscribers and bring them onto the service, which requires variable acquisition costs related to sales, installation and deployment.
 ·
Subscribers are recruited with the goal of reaching a level of aggregate subscriber payments that exceeds the fixed (and variable) recurring service costs.
 ·
The rate at which new subscribers are added is essential to attaining positive cash flow from operations in the near term.
  Assuming we are successful in obtaining users of our service, we anticipate that the recurring nature of our subscription model will result in cash receipts rising in a predictable manner, assuming adequate subscription renewal and continued new additions to the subscription base.
   26
 There is no assurance that we will be successful in implementing our business model.  There are numerous risks affecting our business, some of which are beyond our control.  An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk and may not be appropriate for investors who cannot afford to lose their entire investment.  Potential risks and uncertainties that could affect our operating results and financial condition include, without limitation, those described in “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS”of theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and as described below under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”  In addition to the risks outlined in the Form 10-K and below, risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial might also impair our business operations.
 
 As of June 30, 2010, our COPsync solution had successfully submitted, processed and relayed over 354,311officer initiated information requests.  On average, our service is returning results to mobile users in less than five seconds, well within the 32 second average NCIC 2000 standard for mobile clients.
 
 Effective April 25, 2008, we completed a share exchange with PostInk Technology, LP.  In the share exchange, the owners of PostInk acquired beneficial ownership of approximately 86% of our outstanding common stock.  In addition, in connection with the share exchange, we changed our name from Global Advance Corp. to COPsync, Inc.  As a result of the share exchange, for financial accounting purposes, we treated the share exchange as a purchase of our company by PostInk.
 
 Basis of Presentation, Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
  We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities.  We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  These estimates and assumptions are routinely evaluated.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.
  Our management believes that there has been no significant changes during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to the items we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  Results of Operations
 
 For the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
  Revenue.  For the three month period ended June 30, 2010, our total revenues were $623,956, including $549,800 in hardware, installation and other revenue and $74,156 in license fee revenues, compared to $22,123 for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, $2,922 of which was hardware, installation and other revenue and $19,201 of which was license revenue.  The increase in revenue in both categories was due to increasing sales after the release of our product for licensing in the fourth quarter of 2008 and our recognition of deferred revenue in the second quarter of 2010 from previously executed license agreements.  We only began selling and installing hardware required to run our software in the first quarter of 2009.
  Cost of Revenue.  For the three month period ended June 30, 2010, our cost of revenues was $361,413, resulting in a gross profit of $262,543, compared to cost of revenues of $54,603for the three months ended June 30, 2009, resulting in a gross loss of $32,480.  The increase in costs of revenues in 2010 was primarily due to an increase in hardware and other costs of $301,144.  The gross loss in 2009 was primarily due to $38,386 in amortization of capitalized licensing costs with only $19,201 in offsetting license fee revenues, and $16,217 in hardware and other costs with only $2,922 in hardware, installation and other revenues.
  Operating Expenses.  For the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, our total operating expenses were $547,980 and $539,292, respectively.  This $8,688 increase was due primarily to an $180,370 increase in salaries and wages, primarily as the result of hiring additional sales staff, which was largely offset by a $167,093 decrease in professional fees, due to the value of warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock issued to a consultant included in 2009.
  Other Income (Expense).  For the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 other income was $316,604, as compared to other expense of $26,334 in the same period in 2009.  Other income for 2010 consists primarily of $332,914 in gain on settlement debt, which was recognized in connection with an agreed discharge of $472,000 in principal amount of convertible debt in connection with a settlement agreement relating to pending litigation, offset by accrued settlement costs of $220,000 for 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued in connection with that settlement.  Other income for 2010 also included interest income on cash and cash equivalents of $1,856, and an interest expense of $18,166.  Other expense for 2009 consists of interest income on cash and cash equivalents of $146, offset by an interest expense of $26,334.
   27
  For the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
  Revenue.  For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, our total revenues were $935,080, including $812,189 in hardware, installation and other revenue and $122,891 in license fee revenues, compared to $26,292 for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, $2,922 of which was hardware, installation and other revenue and $23,370 of which was license revenue.  The increase in revenue in both categories was due to increasing sales after the release of our product for licensing in the fourth quarter of 2008 and our recognition of deferred revenue in the second quarter of 2010 from previously executed license agreements.  We only began selling and installing hardware required to run our software in the first quarter of 2009.
  Cost of Revenue.  For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, our cost of revenues was $656,072, resulting in a gross profit of $279,008, compared to cost of revenues of $94,244for the six months ended June 30, 2009, resulting in a gross loss of $67,952.  The increase in costs of revenues in 2010 was primarily due to an increase in hardware and other costs of $549,918.  The gross loss in 2009 was primarily due to $74,908 in amortization of capitalized licensing costs with only $23,370 in offsetting license fee revenues, and $19,336 in hardware and other costs with only $2,922 in hardware, installation and other revenues.
  Operating Expenses.  For the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, our total operating expenses were $1,152,156 and $734,186, respectively.  This $417,970 increase was due primarily to a $382,627 increase in salaries and wages, primarily as the result of hiring additional sales staff, and smaller increases in depreciation and amortization and other general and administrative expenses, which was offset by a $15,890 decrease in professional fees.
  Other Income (Expense).  For the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 other income was $387,149, as compared to other expense of $36,345 in the same period in 2009.  Other income for 2010 consists primarily of $332,914 in gain on settlement debt, which was recognized in connection with an agreed discharge of $472,000 in principal amount of convertible debt in connection with a settlement agreement relating to pending litigation, offset by accrued settlement costs of $220,000 for 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued in connection with that settlement.  Other income for 2010 also included interest income on cash and cash equivalents of $4,745, an induced conversion expense of $4,346, which we recorded upon the conversion of a convertible note at a conversion price less than that stated in the note, and an interest expense of $46,164.  Other expense for 2009 consists of interest income on cash and cash equivalents of $613, offset by an interest expense of $36,958.
  Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
 Since our formation, we have funded our operations primarily through the sale of equity and debt securities.  As of June 30, 2010, we had $485,318 in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $1,141,534 as of December 31, 2009.  The decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was due primarily to $639,203 in cash used in operating activities, primarily as the result of our net loss during that period, and $161,242 used in investing activities, primarily due to $158,142 software development costs, which was partially offset by $144,229 provided by financing activities, including $50,000 in proceeds received from the issuance of shares of our Series B preferred stock and $100,000 in proceeds from the issuance of our common stock and warrants.  On June 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficiency of $199,602, compared to a surplus of $12,412 on December 31, 2009.  The working capital deficiency was due primarily to a decrease of $656,216 in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $220,000 in accrued settlement costs and an increase of $206,466 in deferred revenues, accounts payable and accrued expenses, which was partially offset by a $472,000 decrease in convertible notes payable and a $144,552 increase in accounts receivable and prepaid expenses.
 
 Plan of Operation .
  At June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $485,318 and had a working capital deficiency of $199,602.  We consumed cash of $407,112 during the second quarter of 2010.  Although we anticipate that the rate of our cash consumption will decrease somewhat during the third quarter of 2010, we plan to seek additional financing in the near term in order to support our anticipated operations.  If we are unable to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms, our results of operations will be negatively affected.
 
 Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
 We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate and foreign currency exposure.  We do not believe that we have any material exposure to interest rate risk.  We did not experience a material impact from interest rate risk during fiscal 2009.
 
 Currently, we do not have any significant investments in financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, or to manage our interest rate exposure.
  28
  Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
 
 Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
 We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)).  Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
 Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud.  A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.  To address the material weaknesses, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure our consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
 
 Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
 No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that materially affected, or was reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls
 
 Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
 Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
 
 On December 4, 2009, we filed a lawsuit against Timothy T. Page and various entities that we believe are affiliated with and controlled by Mr. Page in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, captioned COPsync, Inc., et al. v. Timothy T. Page, et al.  On December 30, 2009, Mr. Page and several of the other defendants answered the lawsuit, asserting various affirmative defenses and filing counterclaims against us and the other plaintiffs.  Also on December 30, 2009, Testre, LP, a defendant in the lawsuit, issued a letter demanding payment within thirty (30) days of alleged loans made to us in the amount of $1,182,000, including a $750,000 purported loan by Testre that we claim was repaid by the issuance of warrants to purchase 15,000,000 shares of our common stock upon the closing of the April 2008 share exchange.  On March 22, 2010, Testre filed a lawsuit against us in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, captioned Testre, LP vs. COPsync, Inc., alleging breach of contract and seeking $1,389,656 in principal and interest allegedly due on the above-referenced loans.
 
 Effective June 6, 2010, we entered into a “deal points” settlement agreement with Mr. Page, on behalf of himself and his admitted affiliates, including Testre.  The agreement is an enforceable contract, but contemplates that a full settlement agreement, with mutual releases, will be executed.  The parties are still negotiating the terms of the full settlement agreement.  The deal points settlement agreement provides that:  (i) the $750,000 loan is null, void and unenforceable, (ii) if we complete financing with a party introduced to us by Mr. Page or other identified individuals, we will pay 45% of the funds raised pursuant to such financing toward the principal and accrued interest allegedly owed under purported loans totaling $472,000; otherwise, these purported loans are discharged; (iii) we will issue one million unrestricted shares of our common stock in exchange for warrants to purchase 15 million shares held by Testre; (iv) we will issue to Mr. Page one million additional restricted shares of our common stock; and (v) all parties will release all claims and counterclaims with prejudice.
 
 As discussed above in Note 9 in the notes to the financial statements, we are defendants in an arbitration proceeding filed by Rocket City Enterprises.
 
 We may be involved in other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business.
 
 29
 
 Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
 See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.  The risk factor set forth below and those included in our Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with the considerations set forth above in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 In addition to the risk factors previously identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we replace the risk factor entitled “ We are likely to require additional financing to support our operations. Such financing may only be available on disadvantageous terms, or may not be available at all. Any new financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders.” with the following:
 
 We are likely to require additional financing to support our operations. Such financing may only be available on disadvantageous terms, or may not be available at all. Any new financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders.
 
 At June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $485,318 and had a working capital deficiency of $199,602.  We consumed cash of $407,112 during the second quarter of 2010.  Although we anticipate our cash consumption will decrease somewhat during the third quarter of 2010, we plan to seek additional financing in the near term in order to support our anticipated operations.  If we are unable to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms, our results of operations will be negatively affected.
 
 Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
 On or about May 6, 2010, we completed a private placement of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock, and a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock for $0.20 per share, in exchange for $100,000 in cash, or one share of common stock for each $0.10 of cash.  The shares of common stock were offered and sold to one private individual that we reasonably believe is an “accredited investor,” as such term is defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act.  The offer and sale was made without registration under the Securities Act, or the securities laws of certain states, in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D under the Securities Act and in reliance on similar exemptions under applicable state laws.  No general solicitation or general advertising was used in connection with the offering of the note.  We disclosed to the investor that the shares of common stock, the warrant and the common stock underlying the warrant could not be sold unless they are registered under the Securities Act or unless an exemption from registration is available, and the certificates representing the shares and the warrant included, and the certificates representing the common stock to be issued upon exercise of the note will include, a legend to that effect.
 
 Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
 As discussed under Legal Proceedings above, on December 30, 2009, Testre, LP issued a letter demanding payment in thirty (30) days of alleged loans made to us in the amount of $1,182,000.  On March 22, 2010, Testre filed a lawsuit against us in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, captioned Testre, LP vs. COPsync, Inc., alleging breach of contract and seeking $1,389,656 in principal and interest allegedly due on the above-referenced loans.  Of this amount, we do not believe that a purported loan of $750,000 included in the amount sought was a legitimate obligation and, if it was legitimate, it was repaid by the issuance of warrants.  With respect to the remaining loans subject to this lawsuit, which total $507,427 of principal and accrued interest as of the date of this report, we dispute that we owe any monies on those supposed loans, in part because Testre and its affiliates, including Mr. Page, defrauded and caused damages to us substantially in excess of the amounts owed.  We are seeking to recover those damages in the lawsuit we filed against Mr. Page, Testre and others, as described under “Item 1.  Legal Proceedings”  above.
 
 Effective June 6, 2010, we entered into a deal points settlement agreement with Mr. Page, on behalf of himself and his admitted affiliates, including Testre.  The agreement is an enforceable contract but contemplates that a full settlement agreement, with mutual releases, will be executed.  The parties are still negotiating the terms of that full settlement agreement.  The deal points settlement agreement provides, among other things, that the loans that are the subject of the suit are either null, void and unenforceable or will be discharged in exchange for a contingency settlement payment, as described under “Item 1.  Legal Proceedings” above.
 
 Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)
 
 Item 5.  Other Information
 
 None.
   30
 
 Item 6.  Exhibits
 
 Exhibit No.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS31.1
Certification of COPsync, Inc. Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
Certification of COPsync, Inc. Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
                           
  31
  SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
  COPsync, Inc.Date: August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Russell D. ChaneyRussell D. ChaneyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)