alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
November 6, 2006
    
    /s/ Leonard M. AnthonyLeonard M. AnthonyExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
 Page 40 of 40
#### Darrell BLAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 52138.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 11, 1996.

Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., HANNA and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the denial, without evidentia-ry hearing, of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as being untimely.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Louis Vucci, Jr., President (Principal Executive Officer) of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |                                                                              
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                              
|                      |                                                                              
|Dated: August 3, 2009 | /s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.
Louis Vucci, Jr.
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|                      |                                                                              



---







Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Louis Vucci, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd  (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |                                                                                             
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                                             
|                      |                                                                                             
|Dated: August 3, 2009 | /s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.
Louis Vucci, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

---
Exhibit No.
32.1


Form
10-Q


Signet
International Holdings, Inc.


File No.
000-51185








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,


as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ernest W.
Letiziano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.







Date: November 10,
      2008
            By: /s/
      Ernest W. LetizianoErnest W. Letiziano
              Chief
      Executive Officer and
              Chief
      Financial Officer










A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, David T. Gulian,certify that:

1.           Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of InfoLogix, Inc.;

2.           Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.            Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.            Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.            Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 14, 2007                  |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ David T.  Gulian                   |   |
| David T. Gulian                        |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 111 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14412]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 96-057]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Prospective Patent License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Marotta Scientific Controls, 
Inc., of Montville, New Jersey, has applied for a partially exclusive 
license to practice the inventions described and claimed in U.S. Patent 
Nos. 5,166,679; 5,214,388; 5,363,051; 5,373,245; 5,515,001; and 
5,521,515 entitled respectively, ``Driven Shield Capacitive Proximity 
Sensor,'' ``Phase Discrimination Capacitive Array Sensor System,'' 
``Steering Capaciflector Sensor,'' ``Capaciflector Camera,'' ``Double-
Driven Shield Capacitive Type Proximity Sensor,'' ``Current Measuring 
OP-AMP Devices,'' and ``Frequency Scanning Capaciflector,'' and for the 
following NASA inventions disclosed in NASA Case Nos. GSC-13, 614-1 and 
GSC-13, 710-1, entitled respectively, ``Capaciflector-Guided 
Mechanisms'' and ``3-D Capaciflector.'' All of the aforementioned 
inventions are assigned to the United States of America as represented 
by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written 
objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Mr. 
R. Dennis Marchant, Patent Counsel, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

DATE: Responses to this notice must be received by August 6, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. R. Dennis Marchant, Patent Counsel, NASA Goddard Space Flight 
Center, Mail Code 204, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771; telephone (301) 286-
7351.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-14412 Filed 6-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
<PAGE>


                            EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, File No. 333-37804) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999
Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000 Employee and
Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, of Vyyo Inc., of our report dated January 16,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vyyo Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
February 15, 2001
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1098
REGINALD LEE, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DANTE HEMINGWAY, Defendant - Appellant, and DETECTIVE GIGANO; NATE STEVENSON, Defendants.
No. 04-1099
REGINALD LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DETECTIVE GIGANO, Defendant - Appellee, and DANTE HEMINGWAY; NATE STEVENSON, Defendants.- 2 - Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-2843-WDQ) Submitted: May 26, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. No. 04-1098, affirmed; No. 04-1099, dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Neal Marcellas J aney, Sr., THE JANEY LAW FIRM, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant/Cross-appellee. Reginald Lee, Appellee/Cross-appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cross-appeals, Reginald Lee and Dante Hemingway appeal the district court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment in Lee’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. As to Hemingway’s appeal, No. 04-1098, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Hemingway’s motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeLee v. Hemingway , CA-02-2843-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 16, 2003). We dismiss Lee’s appeal, No. 04-1099, as interlocutory because the district court has not yet entered a final, appealable order as to all parties. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 04-1098, AFFIRMED ; No. 04-1099, DISMISSED
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sun Cal
Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, George Drazenovic
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and                           
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                            
| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Sun Cal Energy, Inc.

May 20, 2009



| | */s/ George Drazenovic*                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | George Drazenovic                                                   
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and
      Director    
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sun Cal Energy,
Inc. and will be retained by Sun Cal Energy, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 2 970

_____________________________
J AMES E MILE B ERNIS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

.

August 27, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and K ELSEY and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 James Emile Bernis
, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
H. Res. 708 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 20, 2010. 

Whereas Ambassador Brinker is the founder of the Susan G. 

Komen for the Cure, the world’s leading breast cancer 

grass roots organization, and Ambassador Brinker established the organization in memory of her sister, who 

passed away from cancer in 1980; 

Whereas through innovative events like Race for the Cure, 

the organization has given and invested nearly 1.5 billion 

for research, health services and education services since 

its founding in 1982; 

Whereas the Susan G. Komen for the Cure has developed a 

worldwide grassroots network of breast cancer survivors 

and activists who are working together to save lives, empower people, ensure quality care for all and energize 

science to find cures; 

Whereas Ambassador Brinker has served as Chair of the 

President’s Cancer Panel (1990); 

Whereas Ambassador Brinker has served as United States 

Ambassador to Hungary (2001–2003); 

Whereas Ambassador Brinker has served as Chief of Protocol 

of the United States (2007–2009); 
2 

•HRES 708 EH 

Whereas, in May of this year, Ambassador Brinker was 

named the first-ever World Health Organization’s Goodwill Ambassador for Cancer Control; 

Whereas, on July 30, 2009, President Obama named Peoria 

native Ambassador Nancy Goodman Brinker as a recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom; 

Whereas the Presidential Medal of Freedom is America’s 

highest civilian honor that is awarded to individuals who 

make an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world 

peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors; 

Whereas Ambassador Brinker’s public service has impacted 

millions of lives and her work, from promoting cancer research to promoting freedom around the world, and has 

been praised by members of both parties; and 

Whereas President Obama will present Illinois native Ambassador Nancy Goodman Brinker with the Presidential 

Medal of Freedom on Wednesday, August 12, 2009: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Nancy Goodman Brinker for receiving the Presidential 

Medal of Freedom. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.6b



SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL AGREEMENTS TO FACILITY LEASE
AGREEMENT CONSTITUTING EXHIBIT 4.6a HERETO


1. Facility Lease Agreement dated as of August 24, 2000 between Keystone Lessor
Genco LLC and Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holding, LLC


2. Facility Lease Agreement dated as of August 24, 2000 between Shawville Lessor
Genco LLC and Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holding, LLC
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

State of Arizona, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

James Russell Myers, 

Defendant.

No. CR-17-8296-PCT- DGC

ORDER 

 James Russell Myers previously attempted to remove his state criminal case to this 

Court, and the Court remanded the matter to state court. Doc. 4. Mr. Myers has now 

filed three motions for reconsideration. Docs. 6, 7, 8. The Court will deny the motions 

and instruct Mr. Myers not file further motions in this case. 

 As the Court’s prior order noted, 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1) is strictly construed against 

removal as “it is considered an encroachment on state court jurisdiction.” Johnson v. 

Washington, No. C07-0696-MJP, 2007 WL 2377141, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 15, 2007). 

It authorizes removal where the defendant “is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of 

such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the 

United States[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1). “This generally requires a state law or 

constitutional provision that denies the defendant an opportunity to raise a federal right.” 

Hollander v. S.F. County Super. Ct., No. C 09-519 SI (pr), 2009 WL 975428, at *1 (N.D. 

Cal. Apr. 9, 2009) (citing Johnson v. Mississippi, 421 U.S. 213, 220 (1975)). 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The motions for reconsideration list a number of federal and state constitutional 

provisions and cases, attach various other documents from state court cases, and argue 

that Mr. Myers’ rights have been denied. They do not identify any state law or 

constitutional provision that denies him the opportunity to raise his state or federal rights 

in state court, nor do they show he will be unable to enforce those rights in state court. 

 A motion for reconsideration will be denied “absent a showing of manifest error or 

a showing of new facts or legal authority that could not have been brought to [the 

Court’s] attention earlier with reasonable diligence.” LRCiv 7.2(g)(1); see Carroll v. 

Nakatani, 342 F.3d 934, 945 (9th Cir.2003). Mere disagreement with an order is an 

insufficient basis for reconsideration. See Ross v. Arpaio, 2008 WL 1776502, at *2 (D. 

Ariz. Apr. 15, 2008). Nor should reconsideration be used to make new arguments or to 

ask the Court to rethink its analysis. Id.; see N.W. Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equip., 

Inc., 841 F.2d 918, 925-26 (9th Cir. 1988). 

IT IS ORDERED that the motions for reconsideration (Docs. 6, 7, 8) are denied. 

Mr. Myers is instructed to file no further motions in this case.

 

 Dated this 21st day of December, 2017.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 517 

Congratulating the University of Washington women’s softball team for 

winning the 2009 Women’s College World Series. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2009 

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. REICHERT, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. 

DICKS, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 

LARSEN of Washington, and Mr. SMITH of Washington) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 

and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of Washington women’s softball team for winning the 2009 Women’s College World 

Series. 

Whereas, on June 2, 2009, for the first time in school history, the Women Huskies won the NCAA National Softball Championship game with a 3–2 victory over the University of Florida; 

Whereas University of Washington pitcher Danielle Lawrie 

was named the Women’s College World Series MVP and 

the USA Softball National Collegiate Player of the Year; 

Whereas the Huskies finished the 2009 season with an impressive record of 51–12; 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 517 IH 

Whereas the members of the 2009 University of Washington 

softball team are excellent representatives of a university 

that is one of the premier academic institutions in Washington State, producing many outstanding student-athletes and other leaders; and 

Whereas the members of the women’s softball have brought 

great honor to themselves, their families, the University 

of Washington, and the State of Washington: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of Washington 

3 for winning the 2009 Women’s College World Series; 

4 (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

5 coaches, students, and staff whose hard work and 

6 dedication helped the University of Washington win 

7 the championship; and 

8 (3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House 

9 to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to 

10 President of the University of Washington, Mark A. 

11 Emmert; the Director of Athletics of the University 

12 of Washington, Scott Woodward, and the Coach of 

13 the University of Washington softball team, Heather 

14 Tarr. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS