alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.1


SUMMARY OF

2006 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AND TARGET PERCENTAGES


Executives,
Officers, Managers, and Key Employees:


Intent: 
To
align long-term interests and to enable executives to develop and maintain a
significant long-term ownership position in the business, as well as to
attract, retain and reward executive officers whose contributions are critical
to long-term success.


Measurement
Criteria:  Awards
are based on achieving financial goals of MarkWest
Hydrocarbon Inc. (“MarkWest Hydrocarbon”) and MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. (“MarkWest
Energy”), on achieving other performance goals, and on department/individual
goals and performance, with each criterion weighted based on individual and
department responsibilities to align performance and goals.


Threshold:  The
payout of incentive awards is contingent upon financial performance (income,
cash flow and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion
and amortization)) being a minimum of 75% of financial plan for each of MarkWest
Energy and MarkWest Hydrocarbon.


Incentive Award Range:  The
incentive award target percentage ranges are set from 30% to 80% of base salary
depending on level and performance achievement, with opportunity for stretch
incentive awards in the ranges of 30% to 80% of base salary if stretch
performance (up to 125% of financial plan) is achieved.


Payout:  MarkWest
Hydrocarbon restricted shares or MarkWest Energy phantom shares, valued at time
of grant.  Share/Units will vest in thirds annually over a three year
period.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.81


                  SUMMARY OF TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP
                             WITH HOWARD E. TAYLOR

         In December 2000, we agreed on the basic terms of an employment
relationship with Howard E. Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Taylor will receive an annual base salary of $325,000, and a discretionary
annual performance bonus consisting of up to $250,000 in cash and a performance
based option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $0.81 per share. In addition, we granted Mr. Taylor an option to acquire
2,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.81 per share.
Two million of the shares vest in eight quarterly increments commencing on
January 1, 2001. The remaining 500,000 shares will vest on January 1, 2004. Mr.
Taylor's employment agreement will be an at-will agreement and either party will
be able to terminate the agreement at any time. Pequot Capital Management, Inc.,
which beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock, and is one of our
largest stockholders, has agreed to pay Mr. Taylor a signing bonus in connection
with his employment with us, in the amount of $650,000, to be paid in two equal
installments on each of January 1, 2001 and April 1, 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,828
<SECURITIES>                                 1,800,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,045,233
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,045,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,090,797
<BONDS>                                        957,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           581
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,145)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,045,233
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,693,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,650,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,806
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,654,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,320,245)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,974,454)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)


</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 643 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any major health 

care reform bill considered on the floor should be available for viewing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. GRIFFITH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

any major health care reform bill considered on the floor 

should be available for viewing. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that, due to the potential for tremendous 

3 change to our Nation’s health care system, any major 

4 health care reform bill that comes to the floor of the 

5 House of Representatives in final form should be available 

6 to Members to view in hardcopy for a week prior to the 

7 final vote on such bill. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 683 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 683

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the House 
should move forward with health care reform legislation, and costs can 
 be contained through prevention and wellness initiatives that empower 
        parents, families, and communities toward better health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2009

  Mrs. McMorris Rodgers submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the House 
should move forward with health care reform legislation, and costs can 
 be contained through prevention and wellness initiatives that empower 
        parents, families, and communities toward better health.

Whereas the percentage of obese Americans increased 37 percent between 1998 and 
        2006, including the number of obese children;
Whereas obesity is now considered a chronic disease and the leading indicator 
        for more serious diseases such as type II diabetes, cardiovascular heart 
        disease, and hypertension in both adults and children;
Whereas the medical costs associated with obesity reached $147,000,000,000 in 
        2008, 9.1 percent of all medical costs in the United States;
Whereas obese Americans spent 42 percent more or $1,429 per person on medical 
        expenses;
Whereas the United States Preventive Task Force recommended clinicians use the 
        Body Mass Index (BMI) to screen adults for obesity;
Whereas children can be screened for hypertension, a proxy for obesity, in 
        schools; and
Whereas Americans have the ability to stop the prevalence of obesity in this 
        country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the House should move forward with health care reform 
        legislation; and
            (2) costs can be contained through prevention and wellness 
        initiatives that empower parents, families, and communities 
        toward better health.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      31.2**





**CERTIFICATION**








I,
      Ching
      Wan Wong, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Fuqi International, Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a.
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b.
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c.
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b.
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.








/s/
      Ching Wan Wong


Ching
      Wan
      Wong


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      21,
      2007
#### LIQUID ENERGY CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TRANS-PAN GATHERING, INC. and Trans-Pan Pipeline Company, Appellees.

No. 07-87-0188-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

Dec. 27, 1988.

Hmkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley, Richard R. Wilfong, Jerry F. Shackelford and David T. Markette, Amarillo, Eugene L. Smith, Houston, for appellant.

Gassaway, Gurley, Sheets & Mitchell, Jody G. Sheets and Timothy D. Zeiger, Borger, W. James Kronzer, Locke, Purnell, Rain & Harrell, Houston, Marshall M. Sear-cy, Jr. and Jody L. McPherson, Dallas, for appellees.

Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and DODSON and BOYD, JJ.

BOYD, Justice.

On August 26, 1988, we rendered our judgment, accompanied by our exhaustive opinion, found at 758 S.W.2d 645, affirming the trial court judgment in this case, and later, on October 13, 1988, overruled Liquid Energy’s motion for rehearing. Because the Supreme Court granted Liquid Energy an extension of time within which to file an application for writ of error that has not expired, we still retain jurisdiction of the appeal.

Now, all parties have filed a joint motion, advising of the settlement of all matters in dispute in this appeal. In that motion, they

> jointly move the Court to vacate its judgment of August 26, 1988, which affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Pursuant to Rules 80, 81 and 82, Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court is authorized to render a judgment that the trial court could render, including taxing costs. Appellant and Appellees move the Court to render judgment reversing the trial court’s judgment and granting a take nothing judgment in favor of Appellant, Liquid Energy Corporation, and providing that each party shall bear its own costs.

Moreover, all parties

> also move the Court to order the release of the principal and all sureties on any supersedeas bonds filed in this action.

Additionally, the parties “move the Court to vacate or withdraw its opinion of August 26, 1988.”

*759The motion is granted, and that action will provide a final disposition of the appeal. Tex.R.App.P. 59(a)(1)(A).

Accordingly, our judgment and opinion dated August 26, 1988, are vacated. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and judgment is here rendered that Trans-Pan Gathering, Inc., Trans-Pan Pipeline Company, and the law firms of Gassaway, Gur-ley, Sheets & Mitchell and Rain, Harrell, Emery, Young & Doke take nothing by their actions asserted against Liquid Energy Corporation in this case.

It is further ordered that the principal and all sureties on any supersedeas bonds filed in this cause are hereby released. All costs are adjudged against the party incurring the same.

Inasmuch as this disposition is made upon the granting of the joint motion of all parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and the mandate shall issue forthwith.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 537 

Requesting that the President and directing that the Attorney General transmit to the House of Representatives all information in their possession 

relating to specific communications regarding detainees and foreign persons suspected of terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2009 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting that the President and directing that the Attorney General transmit to the House of Representatives 

all information in their possession relating to specific 

communications regarding detainees and foreign persons 

suspected of terrorism. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests 

2 the President, and directs the Attorney General, to trans3 mit to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 

4 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, cop5 ies of any portions of all documents, records, and commu6 nications in their possession referring or relating to the 

7 notification of rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 537 IH 

1 436 (1966), by the Department of Justice, including all 

2 component agencies, to foreign persons, captured in Af3 ghanistan, who are suspected of terrorism and detainees 

4 in the custody of the Armed Forces of the United States 

5 in Afghanistan. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America 

vs. 

Alvaro Corona-Acosta 

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 

CASE: 17-11052M

Citizenship: Mexico 

 I state that I am a Border Patrol Agent and that this complaint is based on the following facts: 

COUNT 1: On or about November 17, 2017 at or near Why, Arizona, in the District of Arizona, Alvaro

Corona-Acosta, an alien, entered, and was found in the United States of America after having been denied

admission, excluded, deported, and removed from the United States through Del Rio, Texas on July 18, 2017 and

not having obtained the express consent of the Attorney General or Secretary of the Department of Homeland

Security to reapply for admission thereto; in violation of Title 8, United States Code 1326(a)(1). COUNT 2: That

on or about November 13, 2017 at or near Lukeville, Arizona in the District of Arizona, Alvaro Corona-Acosta, an

alien, did unlawfully enter the United States of America from the United States of Mexico, at a time and place

other than as designated by Immigration Officers of the United States of America, in violation of Title 8, United

States Code 1325(a)(1). 

 Alvaro Corona-Acosta is a citizen of Mexico. On July 18, 2017, Alvaro Corona-Acosta was lawfully denied

admission, excluded, deported and removed from the United States through Del Rio, Texas. On November 17,

2017, agents found Alvaro Corona-Acosta in the United States at or near Why, Arizona without the proper

immigration documents. Alvaro Corona-Acosta did not obtain the express consent of the Attorney General or the

Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to re-apply for admission to the United States. Alvaro

Corona-Acosta, an alien, was found by agents in the United States of America without proper immigration

documents. Furthermore, Alvaro Corona-Acosta admitted to entering the United States of America from the

United States of Mexico illegally, without then being inspected by immigration officers, on November 13, 2017, at

or near Lukeville, Arizona. 

File Date: 11/20/2017 at Tucson, Arizona 

Ryan Worden, Border Patrol Agent 

Sworn to before me and subscribed in my presence,

Date Signed: 11/20/2017 

Eric J Markovich 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Alien Number: 208 184 662

Case 4:17-mj-11052-BGM Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 1
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 664 

Congratulating and honoring Barnes Jewish Hospital, Henry Ford Medical 

Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Integris Baptist Hospital for the 

completion of a successful 16-person kidney transplant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2009 

Mr. CLAY (for himself, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, Mr. CUMMINGS, and Ms. 

FALLIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating and honoring Barnes Jewish Hospital, Henry 

Ford Medical Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and 

Integris Baptist Hospital for the completion of a successful 16-person kidney transplant. 

Whereas, on July 7, 2009, Barnes Jewish Hospital in St. 

Louis, Missouri, Henry Ford Medical Center in Detroit, 

Michigan, Johns Hopkins in Baltimore, Maryland, and 

Integris Baptist Hospital in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 

successfully completed a 16-patient kidney transplant; 

Whereas during the procedure, 8 donors donated kidneys to 

8 recipients in the 4 different hospitals over a 3-week period through a Paired Kidney Exchange; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 664 IH 

Whereas Paired Kidney Exchange matches potential kidney 

recipients with willing donors but incompatible blood and 

tissue with similar donor/recipient pairs; 

Whereas the completion of this procedure marked the largest 

chain of donations in history; 

Whereas the Paired Kidney Exchange program will stand as 

a blueprint for a national match system in which kidneys 

will be transported to different transplant centers across 

the country; and 

Whereas such a system will allow for an estimated 1,500 

more transplants a year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates and honors Barnes Jewish Hospital, Henry 

3 Ford Medical Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and 

4 Integris Baptist Hospital for the completion of a success5 ful 16-person kidney transplant. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

p1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141544-5

HILLS AND DALES GE NERAL HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141544-5 COA: 297227; 297533 Tuscola CC: 09-025524-CK AVELINA M. OXHOLM-D ABABNEH, D.O., and HURON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, d/b/a HURON MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants,

and

LIBERATA J. PANTIG, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
- 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Joseph P. Stone, on behalf of himself and 

all those similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Certified Folder Display Service, Inc., a 

California corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CV-17-04205-PHX-JJT

ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC 

STATUS CONFERENCE 

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Request for a Telephonic Status Conference, and 

good cause appearing therefor; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED setting a telephonic status conference for __________ 

before the Honorable John J. Tuchi. 

Case 2:17-cv-04205-JJT Document 33-1 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Monh SUADY, Appellant.

No. WD 49874.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Jarrett Aiken Johnson, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Monh Suady appeals his conviction by a jury in the Jackson County Circuit Court of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020,1 armed criminal action, § 571.015, and tampering in the second degree, § 569.090, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of twenty years, ten years, and one year, respectively.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994.
Case 2:17-mj-09490-ESW Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-mj-09490-ESW Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-mj-09490-ESW Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 3 of 3