alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 784 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 28, 2009. 

Whereas September 28, 551 B.C., is recognized as the date 

on which Confucius was born in the town of Qufu, in 

what is now the Shandong Province of China; 

Whereas Confucius, who is one of the greatest thinkers, 

teachers, and social philosophers in history, developed a 

philosophy that has deeply influenced, and continues to 

influence, the social and political thought of countries 

around the world, including China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Vietnam; 

Whereas Confucius counseled introspection, self-cultivation, 

sincerity, and the observance of respect within social relationships as a means of achieving justice and attaining 

morality in personal and public life, reflecting a moral 

fiber of the highest degree; 

Whereas the teaching of Confucius that ‘‘what one does not 

wish for oneself, one ought not to do to anyone else; what 

one recognizes as desirable for oneself, one ought to be 

willing to grant to others’’ is a model for ethical behavior 

and for the promotion of harmony among us; 

Whereas Confucius taught that an ideal government is founded upon loyalty, respect for elders, and recognition of the 

importance of family; and 
2 

•HRES 784 EH 

Whereas Confucius taught that politicians must be models of 

truthfulness and morality, which serves as a reminder to 

all of our duty to serve with the utmost honor and respect: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

2,560th anniversary of the birth of Confucius and recognizes 

his invaluable contributions to philosophy and social and political thought. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32-A  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Suren Ajjarapu, Chief Executive Officer of Trxade Group, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:  (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trxade Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m), and  (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 19, 2014  /s/ SUREN AJJARAPU Suren Ajjarapu
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Carl B. McCORMICK, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 64565.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 9, 1994.

Talat Bashir, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by information with receiving stolen property with a value in excess of $150, § 570.080, RSMo 1986. A jury convicted defendant and the trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a prison term of seven years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value *652nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 519 

Expressing appreciation to the people and Government of Canada for their 

long history of friendship and cooperation with the people and Government of the United States and congratulating Canada as it celebrates 

‘‘Canada Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2009 

Mr. STUPAK (for himself, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. MCHUGH, Mrs. 

MILLER of Michigan, Mr. MASSA, Mr. SESTAK, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

DELAHUNT, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. HALL of New York, Ms. SLAUGHTER, 

and Ms. KAPTUR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing appreciation to the people and Government of 

Canada for their long history of friendship and cooperation with the people and Government of the United 

States and congratulating Canada as it celebrates ‘‘Canada Day’’. 

Whereas the United States has a long-cherished economic, social, and political partnership with Canada; 

Whereas the United States and Canada share not only a 

5,500-mile border, but also common ideals and cultural 

affinities; 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 519 IH 

Whereas in this era of heightened security, the United States 

and Canada have renewed cooperative efforts to safeguard the movement of people and goods, improve information-sharing, and strengthen border infrastructure and 

technology; and 

Whereas July 1st of each year is officially celebrated in Canada as ‘‘Canada Day’’ in recognition of the anniversary 

of the establishment of the union of the British North 

American provinces in a federation called Canada: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its appreciation to the people and 

3 Government of Canada for their long history of 

4 friendship and cooperation with the people and Gov5 ernment of the United States; and 

6 (2) congratulates Canada as it celebrates its an7 nual ‘‘Canada Day’’. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") of Parke Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Vito S. Pantilione, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John F. Hawkins, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
/s/ Vito S. Pantilione

/s/
John F. HawkinsVito S. Pantilione


John F. HawkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


(Principal Financial Officer)








May 14, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15050]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Title to Forest Lieu Selection Lands

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Correction of legal description.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service is correcting the legal description of a 
parcel in Table 2, Final List of Lands Quitclaimed by the United 
States, included in the notice concerning Title to Forest Lieu 
Selection Lands that was published in the Federal Register December 26, 
1995 (60 FR 66791).
    This legal description in Table 2 is corrected as follows: On page 
66791, the first line under San Bernardino County, ``68, Schneider, F., 
T.1N., R.1W., sec. 8, S/Lot 5, Lot 8, 80'' should read ``68, Schneider, 
F., T.1N., R.1W., sec. 14, S/Lot 5, Lot 8, 80.''

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective June 13, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marsha Butterfield, Lands Staff, Forest Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. 
20090-6090, (202) 205-1248.

    Dated: June 3, 1996.
Valdis E. Mezainis,
Acting Chief.
[FR Doc. 96-15050 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS      ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | the                Company’s                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March                31, 2007                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the                information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for                the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-50501

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JERRY WAYNE SALLAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western Division of Texas

(A-96-CR-9)

October 20, 1997

Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Wayne Sallas pleaded guilty to the charge of possession of a firearm by a felon in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1). The district court sentenced him to 96 months imprisonment,

three years of supervised release, a $50,000 special assessment, and a $5,000 fine. Sallas appeals.

First, Sallas maintains that the district court erred in denying him a three-level decrease in

sentencing levelfor acceptance ofresponsibilityunder U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Our review of this decision

by the district court is highly deferential because the court’s determination requires an assessment of
2 United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1577 (5th Cir.1994); United States v.

Rodriguez, 942 F.2d 899, 902-3 (5th Cir. 1991).

3 Koon v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 2035, 2045 (1996).

4 U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3(e); United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 808-10 (5th Cir. 1994)

(en banc).

2

credibility.2 After reviewing the evidence presented to the district court at sentencing, we conclude

that the district court did not err. Although Sallas admitted possessing two firearms, he denied

owning four additional guns that were seized. Furthermore, Sallas wrote letters and made several

statementsto familymembersindicating that Debra Sallas, his wife, wasresponsible for his problems.

He even threatened to kill her. This conduct shows that Sallas has not accepted responsibility for his

actions.

Sallas also argues that the district court erred by departing upward from the sentencing

guidelines under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3(e). We review the district court’s decision to grant an upward

departure for abuse of discretion.3 Because there is ample evidence to show that Sallas’s Criminal

HistoryCategory underrepresentsthe seriousness of his previous criminal conduct and the likelihood

that he will commit future crimes,4 we find that the district court did not err by granting an upward

departure. 

The judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Certificate of Incorporation of New York State Voters League, Inc.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 30, 1956.

*William Payton Smith*for petitioner.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

In the specific area of the incorporators’ expected activity through the medium of this proposed membership corporation — registration, voting and other electoral matters — it seems to me that no impression should be permitted to be gleaned by the public that the society is an official function and arm of the State. The name selected in the present certificate, therefore, does not meet with my approval (cf. Election Law, § 20; U. S. Code, tit. 18, § 709; see *Matter of New York Soul Clinic,*208 Misc. 612).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 704 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 704

  Deploring the ongoing violence by Iraqi security forces against the 
                   residents of Camp Ashraf in Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2009

 Mr. Filner submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Deploring the ongoing violence by Iraqi security forces against the 
                   residents of Camp Ashraf in Iraq.

Whereas on July 28, 2009, Iraqi troops and police carried out a violent raid 
        against the residents of Camp Ashraf in Iraq, the longstanding home of 
        an Iranian opposition group;
Whereas Iraqi troops fatally shot a number of Camp Ashraf residents and wounded 
        scores of others; and
Whereas the United States Embassy Statement on Transfer of Security 
        Responsibility for Camp Ashraf of December 28, 2008, states that, ``The 
        Government of Iraq has provided the US Government written assurances of 
        humane treatment of the Camp Ashraf residents in accordance with Iraq's 
        Constitution, laws and international obligations.'': Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) deplores the ongoing violence by Iraqi security forces 
        against the residents of Camp Ashraf;
            (2) calls upon the Iraqi Government to live up to its 
        commitment to the United States to ensure the continued well-
        being of those living in Camp Ashraf and prevent their 
        involuntary return to Iran; and
            (3) calls upon the President to take all necessary and 
        appropriate steps to support the commitments of the United 
        States under international law and treaty obligations to ensure 
        the physical security and protection of Camp Ashraf residents 
        against inhumane treatment and involuntary deportation by Iraqi 
        security forces.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jonathan MEEKS, Appellant, v. Gloria MEEKS, Appellee.

No. 2-88-224-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Jan. 31, 1990.

Travis E. Alley, Alley & Alley, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Bonnie Cade, Goodman, McClaren & Cade, Arlington, for appellee.

Before HILL, KELTNER and MEYERS, JJ.

OPINION ON APPELLEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

MEYERS, Justice.

Appellant filed an appeal in this case alleging an order on application for turnover relief was improperly filed by the trial court. Appellant claimed he was denied due process as there was no judgment and no evidence to support the order. Appellant failed to mention the reason there was no supporting evidence was because the order was filed under the wrong cause number; the order should have been filed in a companion case. Instead, appellee informed this court of the situation, caused nunc pro tunc orders to be filed in each case below to correct the clerical error, and filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We will consider appellee’s motion to dismiss even though it was filed more *824than thirty days after the transcript was filed. *See*TEX.R.APP.P. 72. We note ap-pellee’s mistake in declaring rule 72 *requires*a motion to dismiss be filed more than thirty days after the filing of the transcript. Rule 72 actually provides for a motion to dismiss to be filed within thirty days from the filing of the transcript; but, a motion may be considered by the appellate court if filed outside the thirty-day period.

We find the nunc pro tunc orders cured the clerical error in the causes below. However, we do find the nunc pro tunc order entered in cause number 322-97100, the case in which the original order for turnover relief should have been filed but was not, should instead be titled an original order. However, a misnomer is not fatal to a pleading, TEX.R.CIV.P. 71, and we find no reason for it to be fatal to an order as it is clear what effect the nunc pro tunc order was to have. We hold the nunc pro tunc orders entered in each ease were effective, and the appellate timetable began running from the date the corrected judgments were signed. TEX.R.APP.P. 5(c).

As the order of which appellant complains was corrected by the filing of the nunc pro tunc order in cause number 322-95499, appellant’s complaints are moot. We therefore grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

We must now decide whether to assess damages against the appellant for dilatory tactics, as the appellee requests. Although appellant clearly misrepresented the facts in this case and although the error could have been easily cured had he informed the trial court of the error, we decline to assess additional damages against appellant. Such damages are permitted under TEX.R.APP.P. 84 if conditions warrant, but we cannot say this appeal was taken only for purposes of delay. Thus, no rule 84 damages will be assessed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 E0 05 0

. VI SI ONARY LEARNI NG A CADEMY, INC. v . BRI GHT FROM THE START; GEORGI A DEPARTMENT OF CARE AND LEARNI NG.

On M ay 11
, 2 01 8
, Vi s i o n ary Learn in g Ac a d e m y , In c. (“ V LA”) m o v ed t h i s
Co u rt pu rs u an t to Co u r t o f A p p e a l s R u l es 4 0 (b ) fo r an ex t en s i o n o f t i m e to fi l e an

ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret io n ary ap p eal fro m an Ap ri l 1 0, 20 1 8 o rd er o f t h e Su p eri o r
Co u rt o f Fu l t o n Co u nt y

affi rm in g an ag en cy

d eci s i o n

. Pu rs u an t t o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ), VLA’ s ap pl i c a t i o n was d u e o n M ay 1 0.

Al t h o u g h VLA fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r reco n s i d erat i on of t he s u p eri o r co u rt ’ s o rd er (wh i ch

w a s d e n i e d on M ay 1 0), t h e fi l i n g o f s uch a m ot i o n d o es n o t t o l l t h e t i m e fo r fi l i n g

a d i s cret i o n ary ap p l i cat i o n

. In t h e In ter es t o f A

. R. B.
, 2 09 Ga. Ap p. 3 2 4
, 3 2 5 (1 ) (4 3 3

SE2 d 4 1 1 ) (1 9 93 ). To b e ti m el y , a d i scret i o n ary ap p l i cat i o n m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0

d ay s o f en t ry of t h e o rd er so u g h t t o b e a p p eal ed

. OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (d ). Th e

req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d ict i o n al
, an d t h i s Co urt can no t accep t an

ap p li cat io n fo r ap peal n o t m ad e i n co m p l i an ce t h erewi t h

. Pr i s on Hea l t h Ser vs ., In c.
v. Geo r g i a Dep 't o f Ad mi n

. S er vs

. , 2 6 5 Ga. 8 1 0 , 8 1 1 (1 ) (4 6 2 SE2 d 6 0 1 ) (1 9 9 5 ).

“ No ex t en s i o n s o f t i m e wi l l b e g ran t ed t o fi l e a d is cret i o nary ap p l i cat i o n u n l es s

a m o t i o n fo r ex t en s i o n i s f i l ed on o r b ef

o r e t h e ap p l i cat i o n du e d at e.” Co u rt o f
Ap p eal s Ru l e 3 0 (i ). Becau se VLA fai l ed t o m eet t h e p rereq u i s it es fo r o b t ai n i n g an May 11, 2018ex t en s i o n o f t i m e to fi l e i t s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i sc r e t i o n ary ap p eal
, t h i s Ru le 4 0 (b )

m o ti o n i s h ereb y

DENIED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/11/2018
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Gold Run Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     (iii) the accompanying quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
          fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (iv) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2008                           /s/ Ernest Cleave
                                             --------------------------
                                             Ernest Cleave
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 27, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00361

- CV

Bernardo GONZALES

, Appellant

v.

COURTLAND HEIGHTS

, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CV02572

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s brief was due July 22, 2016

. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of

time was filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his appellant’s brief in this court on or before

August 8, 2016, and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief.

If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court