alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.102
 DYNEGY INC, 
MASTER RETIREMENT TRUST
 THIS AGREEMENT THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY DYNEGY INC. MASTER RETIREMENT TRUST
 th st




---



##### 



ARTICLE ONE: DEFINITIONS
             2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



ARTICLE TWO: VALUATION AND ALLOCATION
  2.2
  4




---



##### 



ARTICLE
THREE: DISTRIBUTIONS
   ARTICLE FOUR: SEPARATE ACCOUNTS AND INVESTMENT ADVISERS
   5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



ARTICLE FIVE: POWERS OF TRUSTEE
          8




---



##### 



ARTICLE SIX: LIMITATIONS ON POWERS
    9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



ARTICLE SEVEN: ACCOUNTS
     11




---



##### 



ARTICLE
EIGHT: TRUSTEE SUCCESSION
    ARTICLE NINE: AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
     12




---



##### 



ARTICLE TEN: MISCELLANEOUS
        13




---



##### 



14




---



##### 



15




---



##### 



ARTICLE ELEVEN: GOVERNING LAW
   16




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 DYNEGY INC.By:

/s/
Jane D. JonesIts: VP, Rewards & Technology  /s/  [ILLEGIBLE]Assistant SecretaryDynegy lnc.
 THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANYBy:
    /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]Its: Vice President The Northern Trust Company
 The Northern Trust Company
  17




---



##### 



SCHEDULE TO
 DYNEGY INC.
 MASTER RETIREMENT TRUST
   18
Exhibit
      32


Section
      1350 Certifications





**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      Sutor
      Technology Group Limited (formerly Bronze Marketing, Inc.). This Certification
      is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
      Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sutor Technology
      Group Limited (formerly Bronze Marketing, Inc.) for the year ended December
      31,
      2006.





The
      undersigned certify that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in such 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sutor Technology
      Group Limited (formerly Bronze Marketing, Inc.) as of December 31,
      2006.





This
      Certification is executed as of March 30 ,
      2007




*By:
        /s/* Guoxiang
        Ni
 
 *Name:* Guoxiang
        Ni
 *Title:
        Chief Executive Officer*
 *(Principal
        Executive Officer)*






*By:
        /s/* Yongfei
        Jiang
 *Name:* Yongfei
        Jiang
 *Title:
        Chief Financial Officer*
 *(Principal
        Financial Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sutor Technology Group Limited (formerly Bronze Marketing, Inc.) and will be
      retained by Sutor Technology Group Limited (formerly Bronze Marketing, Inc.)
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Seguso Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Seguso, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
      to
      my knowledge pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350 ,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




SEGUSO
                HOLDINGS, INC.July
                16, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Robert SegusoRobert
                Seguso
              President,
                Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Seguso Holdings, Inc. and will be retained
      by Seguso Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 656 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Inflammatory Skin Disease 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2009 

Mr. WITTMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Inflammatory 

Skin Disease Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas one in three people in the United States suffers 

from skin disease at any given time; 

Whereas inflammatory skin diseases affect men, women, and 

children of all races; 

Whereas health care cost associated with skin disease present 

a significant impact on our health care economy; 

Whereas inflammatory skin disease can be debilitating, distressing, and diminish the quality of life; 

Whereas inflammatory skin diseases include a wide range of 

symptoms and a broad category of skin conditions including but not limited to eczema, psoriasis, acne, rosacea, 

and dermatitis; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 656 IH 

Whereas it is imperative to educate and provide a better understanding to the public on the symptoms and the burdens of inflammatory skin disease; 

Whereas awareness and education is the key to public health 

relative to skin disease; and 

Whereas often skin conditions can lead to serious illnesses; 

and early detection and awareness can save patients from 

long painful experiences: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘Inflam3 matory Skin Disease Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the work of the Inflammatory 

5 Skin Disease Institute for its efforts to educate, re6 search, and support patient advocacy; and 

7 (3) calls upon the people of the United States 

8 to observe this month with appropriate programs 

9 and activities. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the "Report") of Parke Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Vito S. Pantilione, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John F. Hawkins, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Vito S. Pantilione

/s/ John F. HawkinsVito S. Pantilione

John F. HawkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Accounting Officer)August 15, 2011
#### Billy Lynn STEVENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 284-92.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Jan. 13, 1993.

Richard C. Mabry, Abilene, for appellant.

James Eidson, Dist. Atty. & R. Kent Sutton, Asst. Dist. Atty., Abilene, Robert *754Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault and his punishment was assessed at thirty-seven years confinement. This conviction was affirmed. *Stevens v. State,*822 S.W.2d 810 (Tex.App.—Eastland 1992). We granted discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that the evidence was sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction despite a variance between the victim’s name as alleged in the indictment and the name proven at trial.

The Court of Appeals issued its opinion prior to our decision in *Ward v. State,*829 S.W.2d 787 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). In *Ward,*this Court, in interpreting Arts. 28.10 and 28.11, V.A.C.C.P., held that an amendment to an indictment is effectuated with the permission and direction of the court, but the amendment itself “is the actual alteration of the charging instrument.” *Id.*at 793. Consequently, in *Ward,*we held that the State’s proof was insufficient to sustain the allegations in the indictment.

Rather than address the merits of Appellant’s contention for the first time on petition for discretionary review, it is this Court’s opinion that this cause should be remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of Appellant’s arguments in light of *Ward.*

Therefore, we remand this cause to the Eleventh Court of Appeals for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
#### Theodore HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 57127.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 9, 1990.

Lisa Clover, Henry B. Robertson, Asst. Public Defenders, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Theodore Howard, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Appellant pled guilty to assault in the first degree and robbery in the first degree for which he was sentenced to ten years per count to run concurrently. Appellant claims ineffective assistance of counsel for counsel’s alleged failure to fully inform appellant of the minimum and maximum range of punishment. We have reviewed this allegation, the record on which it is based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court and we do not find the motion court’s determination to be clearly erroneous. *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).
Order entered June 27, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00404-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.A.H. AND L.L.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-04370

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated June 7, 2019, we 

informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record.1 We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification showing the 

reporter’s record had been requested and that appellant had paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the 

appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not 

provided the required documentation nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the 

 

1 That notice, as well as certain other notices sent to appellant, was returned to the Court as undeliverable. Appellant has 

not contacted the Court with a current address.
status of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a 

reporter’s record. 

Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            6978
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           20504
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      42667
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           28677
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             29152
<LOANS>                                         161198
<ALLOWANCE>                                        984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  273174
<DEPOSITS>                                      179825
<SHORT-TERM>                                     17000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2717
<LONG-TERM>                                      12550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                       61020
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  273174
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  15238
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4231
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   833
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 20302
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7438
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9389
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10913
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 189
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5995
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        5995
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.57
<LOANS-NON>                                        506
<LOANS-PAST>                                        11
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   831
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       38
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  984
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               618
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            366
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Wayne A.
Schellhammer, certify that: 1.
I have
  reviewed this interim report on Form 10-QSB of American CareSource Holdings,
  Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2006;2.
Based on my
  knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
  in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my
  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
  in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The small
  business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
  and have:a)
designed
  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
  information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
evaluated
  the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
disclosed in
  this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over
  financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
  recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in
  the case of an annual report), that has materially affected, or is reasonably
  likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control
  over financial reporting; and5.
The small
  business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
  the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
  business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  functions):a)
all
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
  summarize and report financial information; andb)
any fraud,
  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
  a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
  financial reporting.  Dated: May
  9, 2006
By:
/s/ Wayne A.
  SchellhammerWayne A.
  SchellhammerChief
  Executive Officer 31
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeremy Thacker,

Plaintiff,

v. 

GPS Insight LLC and Robert J Donat,

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00063-PHX-SMM

ORDER 

The matter having been reassigned to this Court on December 13, 2019 (Doc. 193), 

IT IS ORDERED setting a final pretrial conference for Friday, January 17, 2020 at 

9:00 a.m. Counsel are reminded of Judge Campbell’s order (Doc. 159) setting this matter 

for a four-day jury trial and the time limits of 8 hours each side to present their case to the 

jury.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel are urged to distill their objections to the 

proposed exhibits and propose a more manageable list at the final pretrial conference.

Dated this 8th day of January, 2020.

Honorable Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cv-00063-SMM Document 196 Filed 01/08/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ J. Eric Pike

J. Eric PikeChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentNovember 10, 2008/s/ Anthony K. Slater

Anthony K. SlaterChief Financial OfficerNovember 10, 2008
#### Floryne MARKS, Appellant, v. Pete GENTILE, d/b/a Pete’s Towing Service, Respondent.

No. 54369.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 31, 1989.

Murray A. Marks, St. Louis, for appellant.

Donald K. Gerard, St. Louis, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

Appellant (plaintiff) appeals the judgment in favor of respondent (defendant) in this court-tried action for damages for the negligent towing of her automobile. We affirm.

While driving northbound on Interstate 270 on the afternoon of July 5, 1984, plaintiff’s automobile left the highway and came to rest in a drainage ditch. Trooper M.E. Hermann arrived on the scene minutes later. He notified defendant, who operates a towing business, to come and pull the car out of the ditch.

In this cause of action, plaintiff alleged the negligence of the tow truck operator resulted in $500 worth of damage to her automobile. Defendant contended the towing operation was not performed negligently and any damage to plaintiff’s car was not caused by the towing. The trial judge found in favor of defendant stating plaintiff failed to prove the damage was caused by the towing.

On appeal plaintiff asserts there is no substantial evidence to support the trial judge’s verdict. We disagree.

Although both plaintiff and her son testified that the damage to the automobile was caused by the towing, defendant testified' he had towed the vehicle in a proper manner and no damage resulted therefrom. *737Furthermore, Trooper Hermann testified he examined the automobile carefully after it was towed onto the roadway and stated the damage now complained of was not present at that time. Although the witnesses’ testimony is conflicting, the determination of the credibility of witnesses is for the trier of fact. *Eckelkamp v. Eckelkamp,*741 S.W.2d 312, 313 (Mo.App.1987). Under these facts, the verdict of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence. Defendant’s motion for damages for frivolous appeal is denied.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.