alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12912]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-521-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

May 17, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 15, 1996, Northern Border Pipeline Company 
(NBPC), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed in 
Docket No. CP96-521-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to construct and operate a 
delivery point to Minnesota Corn Processors (MCP) in Lyons County, 
Minnesota, under NBPC's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP84-
420-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    NBPC proposes to install 120 feet of 8-inch yard piping and 
associated valves and fittings at the site of its Marshall Measurement 
Station located in Lyons County, Minnesota. The estimated cost of the 
facility is $126,000. MCP will reimburse NBPC for the actual installed 
cost of the proposed facilities. NBPC will deliver to MCP up to 20,000 
Mcf on a peak day and an estimated 4,015,000 Mcf annually.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12912 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13023]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Tennessee Valley Authority.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 61 FR 22078 (May 
13, 1996).

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10 a.m. (CDT), 
Wednesday, May 15, 1996.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED PLACE OF MEETING: TVA Customer Service Center, 310 
Research Boulevard, Starkville, Mississippi.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: Each member of the TVA Board of Directors has 
approved the addition of the following items to the previously 
announced agenda:

F--Unclassified

    1. Board approval of a 1996 Funding Plan for nuclear plant 
decommissionings.

    For more information, contact TVA Public Relations at (423) 632-
6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's 
Washington Office (202) 898-2999.

    Dated: May 17, 1996.
William L. Osteen,
Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13023 Filed 5-20-96; 1:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RockwoodHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Zatta, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J. ZATTA                                 |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                     |
| Senior Vice President and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
Exhibit 99.1 A-1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, David Devine,  President and Chief Executive Officer of Devine  Entertainment
Corporation  (the  "Registrant"),  certifies  that to the best of my  knowledge,
based upon a review of the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ David Devine
----------------
Name: David Devine
Date: December 16, 2005
Case 2:17-mj-07549-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07549-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07549-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07549-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. LARRY EUGENE STUTSON, Defendant - Appellant. No. 16-6350 (D.C. No. 5:16- CV-00848-F) (W.D. Okla.)

________________ _________________ ORDER RESCINDING CERTIF ICATE OF APPEALABILITY

________________ _________________ Before KELLY , MATHESON , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ This matter comes on for consid eration of the government’s Motion to Withdraw or Rescind Certificate of A ppealability and Dismiss Appeal and the defendant’s response. Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted. On February 15, 2017, this court granted a certificate of appealability as to “Whether enforcement of a co llateral attack waiver to pr event a constitutional challenge to a sentence enhanced under the now-voi d residual clause of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines would re sult in a miscarriage of justice.” The government argues in its motion that because Beckles v. United States , ___ S. Ct. ___, 2017 WL 855781 (Mar. 6, 2017), held that the Guidelines are not unconstitutionally vague under Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), it undercuts the rationale for granting COA in this case. The defendant agrees. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### March 31, 2017
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 In light of Beckles , we conclude that the aforementioned certificate of appealability was improvidently granted. We RESCIND the certificate of appealability issued on Februa ry 15, 2017, and DISMISS this appeal.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, John
Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon
Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended November
30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ John
Karlsson


John
Karlsson


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer


October
2, 2008







A signed
original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13790]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Renewal Application Designated for Hearing

    1. The Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, has before him the 
following application for renewal of broadcast license:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       MM Docket
                 Licensee                           City/state                     File No.               No.   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hometown Media, Inc......................  Waynesboro, Virginia.......  BR-950601B9                       96-116
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Seeking renewal of the license for WAYB(AM))
    2. Pursuant to Section 309(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
amended, the above application has been designated for hearing in a 
proceeding upon the following issues:
    (a) To determine whether Hometown Media, Inc. has the capability 
and intent to expeditiously resume the broadcast operations of 
WAYB(AM), consistent with the Commission's Rules.
    (b) To determine whether Hometown Media, Inc. has violated Sections 
73.1740 and/or 73.1750 of the Commission's Rules.
    (c) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the 
foregoing issues, whether grant of the subject renewal of license 
application would service the public interest, convenience and 
necessity.
    A copy of the complete HDO in this proceeding is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the dockets 
section of the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. The complete text may also be purchased from the 
Commission's duplicating contractor, International Transcription 
Service, 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037 
(telephone 202-857-3800).

Federal Communications Commission.
Stuart B. Bedell,
Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-13790 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CONVERTER MANUFACTURING, LLC,

Appellant

v.

TEKNI-PLEX, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2023-1801, 2023-1802, 2023-1803

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-

00916, IPR2021-00918, IPR2021-00919.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOSEPH ANTHONY FARCO, Norris McLaughlin, PA, New 

York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

BENJAMIN D. SCHWARTZ. 

 MICHAEL A. FISHER, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT W.

ASHBROOK, JR., DIANE SIEGEL DANOFF, KEVIN M.

FLANNERY, LUKE M. REILLY. 

 ______________________ 

Case: 23-1801 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 09/09/2024
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, CHEN, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 9, 2024

Date

Case: 23-1801 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 09/09/2024
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13683]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 106 / Friday, May 31, 1996 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 27243]]



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AH30


Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Merced, CA, 
Nonappropriated Fund Wage Area

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management is issuing a final rule to 
abolish the Merced, CA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System 
(FWS) wage area and redefine the county having continuing FWS 
employment (Fresno) as an area of application to the Kern, CA, NAF wage 
area for pay-setting purposes. The remaining Merced wage area county 
(Merced) has no FWS employment and is being deleted.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Shields, (202) 606-2848.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 15, 1996, the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) published an interim rule to abolish the 
Merced, CA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage 
area and redefine the county having continuing FWS employment (Fresno 
County) as an area of application to the Kern, CA, NAF wage area for 
pay-setting purposes. The remaining Merced wage area county (Merced) is 
being deleted because is has no FWS employment. The interim rule 
provided a 30-day period for public comment. OPM received no comments 
during the comment period. Therefore, the interim rule is being adopted 
as a final rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that these regulations will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
will affect only Federal agencies and employees.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.

    Accordingly, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 5343, the interim rule 
amending 5 CFR part 532 published on February 15, 1996 (61 FR 5921), is 
adopted as final without any changes.

Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director,
[FR Doc. 96-13683 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Online Innovation, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlene C.
Schluter, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date:  September 1, 2005

//s// Marlene C. SchluterMarlene C. Schluter,
Director,Principal Financial Officer

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seifi Ghasemi,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 7,  2008          |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                         |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                   SAFENET, INC. CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                     INFORMATION RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC.


      Information Resource Engineering, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

            FIRST. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by striking out Article FIRST of the Certificate of Incorporation and
inserting in lieu thereof the following:

            "FIRST: The name of the corporation shall be: SafeNet, Inc."

            SECOND. That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting
duly convened and held adopted a resolution in which was set forth the foregoing
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and calling a meeting of stockholders of the Corporation for
consideration thereof.

            THIRD. That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of the Board of
Directors, a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

            FOURTH. That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance
with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

            FIFTH. That the capital of the Corporation shall not be reduced
under or by reason of this amendment.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed in its name and on its behalf by its President, and attested by its Vice
President, this 23rd day of October 2000.


          ATTEST:                             INFORMATION RESOURCE
                                              ENGINEERING, INC.



/s/ Steve Turner                            By:  /s/ Anthony A. Caputo
----------------------------                   ----------------------------
Steve Turner, Vice President                   Anthony A. Caputo, President
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13630]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1867-000]


Kansas City Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

May 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Kansas City Power & Light Company 
filed a transmission tariff in compliance with the Commission's Final 
Rule in Docket No. RM95-8-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before June 3, 1996. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13630 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M