alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 6 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01263 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 01264 - CR CHRISTOPHER EUGENE A DDISON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F17 - 76577 - J & F17 - 76578 - J



### O RDER Before the Court is court reporter Kimberly Xavier’s March 4, 2019 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record . We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record filed within TWENTY - ONE DAYS of the date of this order. Ms. Xavier is cautioned that further extensions will be disfavored.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12944]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Southeast Alaska Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Council; 
Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southeast Alaska Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory 
Council will meet in Juneau, Alaska, on June 4 and 5, 1996, at the 
Juneau City Council Chambers. The public is invited to attend the 
meeting, observe the proceedings, and provide oral testimony on two 
agenda items: (1) The advance notice of proposed rulemaking published 
April 4, 1996, in the Federal Register (61 FR 15014) concerning 
modifications to Federal Subsistence Management Regulations for Public 
Lands in Alaska, at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, part 242, 
and 50 CFR part 100, and (2) revision of the Tongass National Forest 
Land and Resource Management Plan (61 FR 18587).

DATES: The meeting will be held June 4 and 5, 1996, from 9 a.m. to 5:30 
p.m. Oral testimony will be taken from 2 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. on June 5.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Juneau City Council 
Chambers, 155 S. Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Fred P. Clark, Council Coordinator, (907) 586-7895).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Southeast Alaska Federal Subsistence 
Regional Advisory Council is one of the councils established in each 
subsistence resource region by the Federal Subsistence Board, to 
provide regional forums for the collection and expression of opinions 
and recommendations on matters related to subsistence taking and uses 
of fish and wildlife resources on public lands and to provide for 
public participation in the Federal regulatory process. The councils 
operate in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and have 
been established in accordance with the Alaska National Interest Lands 
Conservation Act.

    Dated: May 17, 1996.
Kimberly Evart Bown,
Acting Deputy Regional Forester for Resources, USDA Forest Service, 
Alaska Region--Region 10.
[FR Doc. 96-12944 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Excel Fortress Limited, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

Vaughn La Verl Wilhelm, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-04297-PHX-DWL

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to file certain documents 

under seal (Doc. 183). The public has a general right to inspect judicial records and 

documents, such that a party seeking to seal a judicial record must overcome “a strong

presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 

1178 (9th Cir. 2006). To do so, the party must “articulate compelling reasons supported 

by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the

public policies favoring disclosure . . . .” Id. at 1178-79 (internal quotation marks and 

citations omitted). The Court must then “conscientiously balance the competing interests 

of the public and the party who seeks to keep certain judicial records secret.” Id. at 1179 

(internal quotation marks omitted). “After considering these interests, if the court decides 

to seal certain judicial records, it must base its decision on a compelling reason and 

articulate the factual basis for its ruling, without relying on hypothesis or conjecture.” Id.

(internal quotation marks omitted).

The “stringent” compelling reasons standard applies to all filed motions and their 
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

attachments where the motion is “more than tangentially related to the merits of a case.” 

Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096, 1101 (9th Cir. 2016). A

motion for full or partial summary judgment is clearly such a motion.

The documents contain trade secrets, and keeping these trade secrets confidential 

is a compelling reason that outweighs the general public right of access. Kamakana, 447 

F.3d at 1179.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to file under seal (Doc. 183) 

is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall seal Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 to Exhibit A, the 

Declaration of D. Elroy Fimrite, to Plaintiff EFG America, LLC’s Response to 

Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Statement of Additional 

Material Facts That Preclude Summary Judgment.

Dated this 13th day of September, 2019.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of  U S Canadian Minerals Inc for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of U S Canadian Minerals Inc for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
U S Canadian Minerals Inc



|                                                                        |                                         
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|By:                                                                     |                                         
|Name:                                                   Adam Jenn       |                                         
|Title:                                                                  | Principal Executive Officer and Director
|Date:                                                                   | September 12, 2008                      
|By:                                                                     |                                         
|Name:                                               Van der Bok Busboom |                                         
|Title:                                                                  | Principal Financial Officer             
|Date:                                                                   | September 12, 2008
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00332

- CV

KATRINA AHRENS

, Appellant

v.

DALLAS POLICE ASSOCI ATION, DPA'S

ASSIST THE OFFICER F OUNDATION, INC.,

FREDERICK FRAZIER, C ITY OF DALLAS,

AND ZAC PRODUCTS II, LLC

, Appellee s

From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- C201700365

and

No. 10

- 18

- 00207

- CV

IN RE DPA'S ASSIST T HE OFFICER FOUNDATIO N, INC.

Original Proceeding

ORDER

The trial court judge in these proceedings recused himself on June 1, 2018 . TheAhre ns v. Dallas Police Association Page 2

In re DPA’s Assist the Officer Foundation, Inc. Court has not been informed whether a new trial court judge has been appointed to hear

the underlying case. Accordingly, the Court requests a status report from the parties,

which shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court no later than 7 days from the date of this

order, informing the Court whether a new trial court judge has been appointed to hear

the underlying case and if so, the name of that judge

.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Repo rt requested

Order i ssued and filed August 1 , 2018
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2007 of Ready Mix, Inc. (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 9, 2007
    /s/ Bradley E. LarsonBradley E. LarsonChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25


                               November 29, 2000


KPMG Consulting, Inc.
1676 International Drive
McLean, Virginia 22102
Attention: Randolph C. Blazer
           Chief Executive Officer

Ladies and Gentlemen:

             We refer to the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of
September 15, 2000 (the "Purchase Agreement") by and among KPMG LLP, a
registered Delaware limited liability partnership ("LLP"), and the other parties
thereto, and to the Certificate of Designation (the "Certificate of
Designation") of the Series A Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of KPMG Consulting, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("KCI") (the "Series A Preferred Stock"). Capitalized terms used but
not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Certificate of
Designation.

             LLP hereby agrees that, in the event of a Qualified IPO and
notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Purchase Agreement or
the Certificate of Designation (including Section 6 thereof) or any other rights
under the Series A Preferred Stock, LLP will accept upon conversion of each
share of Series A Preferred Stock purchased by LLP under the Purchase Agreement
and held by LLP, immediately prior to the consummation of such Qualified IPO,
that number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock equal to the
Original Issue Price divided by a price equal to the Qualified IPO Price,
without any discount to the Qualified IPO Price. This letter agreement shall
terminate if the pricing of the Qualified IPO has not occurred by midnight on
February 12, 2001.

             Upon receipt by LLP of the shares of Common Stock as determined in
the foregoing paragraph, KCI will have satisfied in full its obligations set
forth in Section 6.a. of the Certificate of Designation with respect to the
conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock held by LLP.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       KPMG LLP


                                       By:  /s/ Robert W. Alspaugh
                                          ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert W. Alspaugh
                                            Title: Deputy Chairman
Agreed and Acknowledged:

KPMG CONSULTING, INC.


By: /s/ Nathan H. Peck
   --------------------------------
    Name:  Nathan H. Peck
    Title: CAO
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Financial Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terence Davis, Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Terence Davis |
|--------|-------------------|

Terence Davis

Principal Financial Officer

March 31, 2008
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David SALLEY, Defendant/Appellant. David SALLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 64568, 67324.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 12, 1995.

Lew Kolias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, David R. Truman, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J. and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction in this court-tried ease for one count of kidnapping (Count I), § 565.110(4), RSMo 1986, one count of forcible rape (Count II), § 566.030, RSMo Supp.1991, four counts of forcible sodomy (Counts III, IV, IX *&*X), § 566.060, RSMo. Supp.1991, one count of first degree burglary (Count V), § 569.160, RSMo 1986, one count of first degree assault (Count VI), § 565.050, RSMo 1986, one count of first degree robbery (Count VII), § 569.020, RSMo 1986, one count of armed criminal action (Count VIII), § 571.015, RSMo 1986, and one count of second degree property damage (Count XI), § 569.100, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced to prison terms of ten years on Count I, life on Count II, to be served consecutively to the sentence in Count I, life on Count III, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I and II, life on Count IV, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I through III, ten years on Count V, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I through IV, ten years on Count VI, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I through V, thirty years on Count VII, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I through VI, thirty years on Count VIII, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I through VII, life on Count IX, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I through VIII, life on Count X, to be served consecutively to the sentences in Counts I through IX, and six months on Count XI. Defendant also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the motion court did not clearly err in denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Leah Wosk, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International
     Cellular, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of August, 2005.


/s/ Leah Wosk
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer