alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11522]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 701-TA-367 (Preliminary)]


Certain Laminated Hardwood Flooring From Canada

Determination

    On the basis of the record <SUP>1 developed in the subject 
investigation, the Commission determines<SUP>2, pursuant to section 
703(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. Sec. 1671b(a)), that there 
is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is 
materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of 
imports from Canada of certain laminated hardwood flooring, provided 
for in subheading 4421.90.98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States, that are alleged to be subsidized by the Government of 
Canada.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec. 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Chairman Peter Watson and Vice Chairman Janet Nuzum 
dissenting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    On March 7, 1996, a petition was filed with the Commission and the 
Department of Commerce by the Ad Hoc Committee on Laminated Hardwood 
Trailer Flooring (Anderson-Tully Co. (Tully), Memphis, TN; Cloud Corp. 
(Cloud), Harrison, AK; Havco Wood Products, Inc. (Havco), Cape 
Girardeau, MO; Industrial Hardwoods Products Inc. (IHP), Redwing, MN; 
and Lewisohn Sales Co. Inc. (Lewisohn), North Bergen, NJ), alleging 
that an industry in the United States is materially injured or 
threatened with material injury by reason of subsidized imports of 
laminated hardwood flooring from Canada. Accordingly, effective March 
7, 1996, the Commission instituted countervailing duty investigation 
No. 701-TA-367 (Preliminary).
    Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigation and of 
a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register of March 20, 1996 (61 FR 11430). The 
conference was held in Washington, DC, on March 28, 1996, and all 
persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in 
person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on April 22, 1996. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 2956 (April 1996), 
entitled ``Certain Laminated Hardwood Flooring from Canada: 
Investigation No. 701-TA-367 (Preliminary).''

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 30, 1996.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11522 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF

VYYO INC.



I, Davidi Gilo, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Vyyo Inc. (the registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                    |  |                                      |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: February 24, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    DAVIDI
GILO
|                        |  |  |  |                    |  | Davidi Gilo, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13420]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration
[AC No. 43.13-1A]


Proposed Revision B to Advisory Circular (AC) on Acceptable 
Methods, Techniques, and Practices--Aircraft Inspection and Repair

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Proposed Revision B to AC 43.13-
1A, and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of and requests 
comments on proposed revision B to AC 43.13-1A, Acceptable Methods, 
Techniques, and Practices--Aircraft Inspection and Repair, which 
provides guidance on acceptable methods, techniques, and practices 
associated with inspection and repairs to small, nonpressurized, older 
aircraft of 12,500 pounds or less. This notice is necessary to give all 
interested persons an opportunity to present their views on the 
proposed revision to the AC. Any comments, corrections, or suggestions 
should reflect the applicable AC chapter, page, and paragraph number. 
If new data are suggested, a copy of these data, repair methods, 
inspection procedures, or new techniques should be enclosed with the 
comments.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments on the proposed AC to: FAA, Manufacturing 
Standards Section, AFS-613, 6500 S. MacArthur Boulevard, ARB Room 304, 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125. Requests for copies of the proposed AC 
can be facsimiled to AFS-613 at (405) 954-4104. Comments may be 
inspected at the above address between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. William F. O'Brien, General Aviation and Commercial Branch, AFS-
340, FAA, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone: 
(202) 267-3796, facsimile (202) 267-5115.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 22, 1996.
William J. White,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 96-13420 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12560]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mississippi River Coordinating Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior Department.

ACTION: Notice of Final meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Mississippi 
River Coordinating Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

MEETING DATE, TIME: Thursday, June 20, 1996, 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Holiday Inn Metrodome, 1500 Washington Avenue South, 
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    The agenda item for the meeting is consideration of an amendment to 
the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area's comprehensive 
management plan to provide for partnerships in education programs and 
facilities within the city of Saint Paul. A Commission vote on the 
Proposed amendment is expected. Public statements about this topic will 
be taken.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mississippi River Coordinating 
Commission was established by PL 100-696, November 18, 1988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent JoAnn Kyral, 
Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, 175 East Fifth Street, 
Suite 418, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 or telephone 612-290-4160.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
William W. Schenk
Field Director, Midwest Field Area.
[FR Doc. 96-12560 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Smitten Press: Local Lore and Legends,
      Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Robert Cox, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      December 12, 2007





/s/
                Robert CoxRobert
                CoxChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Siran Kandolian, as Administratrix of the Estate of Vagharsh H. Kandolian, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

October 19, 1956.

*Jack Chadrjian*for petitioner.

*Daniel Jacobs*for respondent.

Maximilian Moss, S.

The decedent’s estate is primarily liable for his funeral expenses (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 216). As the decedent’s widow was apparently unable to arrange for the decedent’s burial, the decedent’s brother-in-law, who made such arrangements, is not to be deemed a volunteer. His claim for repayment of funeral expenses is therefore allowable to the extent that they are reasonable in the light of the decedent’s estate. Reimbursement is denied with respect to an excess of $75 for professional funeral services, $143 concrete vault and $10 for excess death transcripts. Reimbursement is also denied with respect to $10 for medical expenses and $30 for flowers which is deemed a memorial offering by decedent’s sister and the latter’s husband; In all other respects, the amount sought is allowed but payment of $200 thereof for decedent’s grave will not be required until compliance by the claimant with the conditions hereinafter set forth with respect to the registration of ownership of said grave. The receipt for that grave is *712registered in the claimant’s name. The decedent’s distributees were his widow and sister. His estate being less than $10,000, the widow is entitled to all oí it (Decedent Estate Law, § 83, subd. 4) and thus both its beneficial interest and legal title have merged in her *(Blood*v. *Kane,*130 N. Y. 514). The payment directed herein for decedent’s grave, is not one which would entitle the decedent’s sister to be registered as a distributee of the decedent on the cemetery receipt in the manner provided under subdivision 5 of section 84 of the Membership Corporations Law, in view of the widow’s sole inheritable interest in the decedent’s estate. Upon the death of an owner of a burial lot, under subdivision 6 of the aforesaid section, his interest therein passes to his devisees, if any, but if none, “ then to his * * * descendants then surviving, and if there be none, then to the surviving spouse ”, That provision evidences is some measure that the right of interment is not conferred upon decedent’s collateral relatives when he is survived by a widow and no descendants.

The claimant, upon tender to the widow of the cemetery receipt or other evidence of ownership of said burial lot properly registered by the cemetery corporation in the name of the widow, shall be paid in full for said grave. Settle decree on notice.
#### Jan ROSANKY A/K/A Jan Dean, Appellant, v. SEAL-PAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., Appellee.

No. B14-89-00398-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

June 8, 1989.

Bruce A. Coane, David S. Masquelette, Houston, for appellant.

Stephen H. DonCarlos, Baytown, for ap-pellee.

Before MURPHY, ROBERTSON and SEARS, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction.

The judgment was signed on March 9, 1989. The time for filing the cost bond expired on March 29, 1989. Tex.R.App.P. 42(a)(3). Cash in lieu of bond was filed on April 24, 1989. Appellant filed no motion to extend time to file the cash deposit. In an accelerated appeal, however, there is no provision for an extension of time to perfect the appeal.1 Tex.R.App.P. 42. Since *676there is no provision, time can not be extended to file the bond. Failure to timely file the cash deposit is jurisdictional. This court, therefore, has no authority to consider the appeal.

On May 12, 1989, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex.R.App.P. 42(a)(3), 40(a), 46, 60(a)(2). Appellant’s response advances no argument to support a finding of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

1

. The Corpus Christi court, in *St. Louis Federal Savings*& *Loan Association*v. *Summerhouse Joint Venture,*739 S.W.2d 441 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no writ), held for the same proposition. The case they relied on in making the ruling, *Brogdon*v. *Ruddell,*717 S.W.2d 675 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.), relied on cases that were handed down *before*there was any provision in the rules for an extension of time in ordinary appeals.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Presidential Documents 26019

Presidential Determination No. 96–20 of April 1, 1996

Suspending Restrictions on U.S. Relations With the Palestine

Liberation Organization

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Middle East Peace Facilitation

Act of 1995, title VI, Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related

Programs Appropriations Act, 1996, Public Law 104–107, (‘‘the Act’’), I

hereby:

(1) Certify that it is in the national interest to suspend the application

of the following provisions of law until June 15, 1996:

(A) Section 307 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22

U.S.C. 2227), as it applies with respect to the Palestine Liberation Organization or entities associated with it;

(B) Section 114 of the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years

1984 and 1985 (22 U.S.C. 287e note), as it applies with respect to the

Palestine Liberation Organization or entities associated with it;

(C) Section 1003 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years

1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. 5202); and

(D) Section 37, Bretton Woods Agreement Act (22 U.S.C. 286w), as it

applies to the granting to the Palestine Liberation Organization of observer

status or other official status at any meeting sponsored by or associated

with the International Monetary Fund.

(2) certify that the Palestine Liberation Organization, the Palestinian Authority, and successor entities are abiding by the commitments described in

section 604(b)(4) of the Act.

(3) certify that funds provided pursuant to the exercise of this authority

and the authorities under section 583(a) of Public Law 103–236 and section

3(a) of Public Law 102–125 have been used for the purposes for which

they were intended.

You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, April 1, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–12936

Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
EXHIBIT 32.1.
                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Ed Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period December 31, 2006 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                        By:/s/ Ed Bailey
                                         -------------------------------
                                        Ed Bailey
                                          Chief Executive Officer

November 2, 2007

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and will be retained by LightTouch
Vein & Laser, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13000]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Elementary, Secondary and Informal 
Education; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Elementary, 
Secondary and Informal Education (#59).
    Date and Time: Wednesday, June 12, 1996, 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.; 
Thursday, June 13, 1996, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; Friday, June 14, 
1996, 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Place: Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street NW., Washington, DC
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Janice Earle, Program Director, Division of 
Elementary, Secondary and Informal Education, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
306-1620
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals for the Middle School Science Teachers 
Enhancement's Program submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 20, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13000 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.5

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. II

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Florida Holding Co. II (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 10, 2007



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPrincipal Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Francisco Javier Barraza-Juarez, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-17-01541-PHX-GMS

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure his appearance at future proceedings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 15th day of April, 2019