1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alyssa Jones,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Riot Hospitality Group LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-04612-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

Before the Court is Defendants’ Second Renewed Motion to Enforce the Court’s 

Orders and Exclude Alyssa Jones, Shea Watson, and Chelsea Meyers from Testifying. 

(Doc. 403.) For the reasons explained below, the Motion to Enforce is deferred until the 

Order to Show Cause hearing. 

I. Civil Contempt Standard

A party may be held in civil contempt when, after receiving notice, it fails to take 

all reasonable steps within its power to comply with a specific and definite judicial order. 

18 U.S.C. § 401(3) (“A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or 

imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as 

. . . [d]isobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or 

command.”); In re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litig., 10 F.3d 693, 695 

(9th Cir. 1993). A district court has “wide latitude in determining whether there has been a 

contemptuous defiance of its order[s].” Stone v. City & Cty. of San Francisco, 968 F.2d 

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 409 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 5
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

850, 856 (9th Cir. 1992). The Ninth Circuit’s rule regarding contempt “has long been 

whether defendants have performed ‘all reasonable steps within their power to insure

compliance’ with the court’s orders.” Stone, 968 at 856 (quoting Sekaquaptewa v. 

MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 404 (9th Cir. 1976)).

The moving party bears the initial burden of establishing by clear and convincing 

evidence that the contemnors violated a specific and definite order of the court. Donovan 

v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1240 (9th Cir. 1983). The burden then shifts to the contemnors 

to produce evidence explaining their noncompliance. Id. The contemnors must show that 

they took every reasonable step to comply. Sekaquaptewa, 544 F.2d at 406. Mr. Nathanson 

has stated to the Court that he represents both subpoenaed witnesses Ms. Watson and Ms. 

Meyers. He also represents the Plaintiff, Ms. Jones. A contempt proceeding is, generally,

the appropriate way in which to enforce compliance with subpoenas issued by this Court. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(g). In addition to contempt against both witnesses and Mr. Nathanson, 

the Court may also sanction the witnesses, Mr. Nathanson, and Ms. Jones pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2).

II. Analysis 

Defendants have met their initial burden of producing clear and convincing evidence 

that Plaintiff Alyssa Jones, and witnesses Shea Watson, and Chelsea Meyers and their 

attorney, Mr. Nathanson, violated a specific and definite court order. Plaintiff’s Witnesses 

were originally ordered to produce data from their cell phones on March 11, 2020. 

(Doc. 308.) After they failed to comply with the March order, the Court granted leave to 

serve Witnesses Shea Watson and Chelsea Meyers with subpoenas and ordered Plaintiff 

Alyssa Jones to provide her phone to the parties’ third-party forensic search specialist 

(“Specialist”). (Doc 350.) On August 14, 2020, Witnesses Shea Watson and Chelsea 

Meyers were served with subpoenas commanding them to produce the contents of their 

communications with the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s other witnesses. (Doc. 358); 

(Doc. 359.) Plaintiff Alyssa Jones and Witnesses Shea Watson and Chelsea Myers 

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 409 Filed 02/08/21 Page 2 of 5
- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

delivered their phones to the Specialist for imaging.

The relevant documents from these devices, however, were never produced after 

being recovered and transmitted to Plaintiff’s Counsel, Philip Nathanson. After a hearing 

on September 22, 2020, the Court ordered “that the relevant documents and accompanying 

privilege logs from the cell phones belonging to Plaintiff Alyssa Jones, and Witnesses 

Chelsea Myers and Shea Watson must be produced to Defendants by October 22, 2020,” 

warning that “if Plaintiff Alyssa Jones, or witnesses Chelsea Myers, Shea Watson, or Elle 

Foster do not comply with this order, they will be precluded from testifying at trial.” 

(Doc. 367.) Mr. Nathanson and Plaintiff’s Witnesses failed to comply with the Court’s 

order. On November 16, 2020, the Court ordered that “[t]he relevant documents and 

accompanying privilege logs from the cell phones belonging to Plaintiff Alyssa Jones, and 

witnesses Chelsea Myers and Shea Watson must be produced to Defendants by December 

11, 2020.” (Doc. 396 at 2.) Mr. Nathanson and Plaintiff’s Witnesses again failed to comply. 

Id.

Mr. Nathanson’s assertions that the scope of the cell phone disclosures prevented 

realistic production of the communications are undermined by his prior representations and 

the repeated extensions granted by the Court. During the September 22, 2020 hearing, the 

Specialist clarified that Mr. Nathanson had made little effort to resolve their asserted 

technical difficulties in order to comply with the Court’s deadlines. (Doc. 375 at 18-20.)

The Court ordered: 

I am going to direct Mr. Nathanson -- I am going to allow him to preserve

his relevance review so long as he provides a full privilege log on all of the 

requested information with all of the search terms. And if he doesn’t provide 

all the documents within three weeks from today, all of the witnesses, 

including the plaintiff, who have refused to provide that material, will not be 

allowed to testify at all at trial.

Id. at 19. Again, at the November 13, 2020 hearing, Mr. Nathanson had not made efforts 

to sort the communications and had failed to coordinate with the Specialist regarding his

asserted technical difficulties. (Doc. 398 at 21–25.) The Court directed Mr. Nathanson: 

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 409 Filed 02/08/21 Page 3 of 5
- 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[I]t’s your obligation to get in touch with Mr. Kuchta, figure out how to work 

this system, to do -- and to provide all the materials by December 11th and 

to provide this Court. . . . And then I’m not going to give you any further

extensions after December 11th. 

Id. at 22–23. And most recently, Mr. Nathanson again failed to make efforts to coordinate 

with the Specialist and sort the communications until nine days prior to the December 11, 

2020 deadline set by the Court. (Doc. 403-1 at 53–54.) He did not produce the sorted 

documents to the Specialist as required until December 10, 2020. Id. Mr. Nathanson then 

instructed the Specialist not to disclose the communications until expressly authorized. Id.

As a result, no documents or logs have been produced. Id. That Mr. Nathanson again asserts

he did not have enough time to resolve this self-created emergency does not demonstrate 

he was unable to comply with the Court’s orders.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, Mr. Nathanson, Plaintiff Alyssa Jones, and 

witnesses Chelsea Myers and Shea Watson must show cause for their failure to produce 

communications as ordered by the Court. Moreover, in addition to the above contempt 

power, the Court reserves the right to impose sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure Rule 37 as appropriate. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Alyssa Jones, and witnesses Chelsea 

Myers and Shea Watson shall show cause within seven (7) days of the date of this Order 

showing why this court should not hold them in contempt for failing to produce the contents 

of their cell phones pursuant to this Court’s Order. (Doc. 367.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Alyssa Jones, and witnesses Chelsea 

Myers and Shea Watson may be held in contempt and or sanctioned and precluded from 

testifying at trial if seven (7) days from the date of this Order they fail to show cause for 

their failure to produce their communications to Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Counsel, Philip Nathanson, shall 

show cause within seven (7) days of the date of this Order showing why this court should 

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 409 Filed 02/08/21 Page 4 of 5
- 5 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

not hold him in contempt for failing to produce the contents of Alyssa Jones’, Chelsea 

Myers’, and Shea Watson’s cell phones pursuant to this Court’s Orders. (Doc. 375); 

(Doc. 398).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Telephonic Order to Show Cause Hearing 

on February 26, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Defendants’ Counsel shall set up a call-in number and 

provide the information to all parties including the Court by Noon on February 24, 2021.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Second Renewed Motion to 

Enforce the Court’s Orders and Exclude Alyssa Jones, Shea Watson, and Chelsea Meyers 

from Testifying (Doc. 403) is DEFERRED until the Order to Show Cause hearing. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ deadline to file a motion for 

summary judgment is extended to April 27, 2021 in accordance with the above dates. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Request for Leave to File Motion 

for Expedited Ruling on Defendants’ Request to Enlarge Summary Judgment Deadline 

(Doc. 408) is DENIED as moot.

Dated this 8th day of February, 2021.

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 409 Filed 02/08/21 Page 5 of 5