alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael P. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56710.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 6, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied April 17, 1990.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Michael P. Taylor, pled guilty to second degree murder and armed criminal action and was sentenced to two concurrent twenty-five (25) year prison terms. He appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed this allegation, the entirety of the record on which it is based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court, and we do not find the court’s findings and conclusions to be clearly erroneous. *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). We also find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and, therefore, we affirm the motion court’s denial pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                   AMENDMENT
                                   ---------

                        TO INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION GRANTS
                        --------------------------------

     AMENDMENT, dated as of September __, 2000 between Zany Brainy, Inc. (the
"Company") and Thomas G. Vellios (the "Optionee").

                                   RECITALS

     The Company has issued to the Optionee stock options (the "Options") to
purchase shares of common stock of the Company ("Shares") under the Children's
Concept, Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan") and the Zany Brainy,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Equity Compensation Plan (the "1998 Plan") by
Stock Option Grant Agreements (the "Grant Agreements") as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Date of Grant               # of Option Shares          Exercise Price Per Share
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                <C>                         <C>
November 6, 1995                    200,000                         $ 3.33
March 21, 1997                      150,000                         $ 3.33
January 28, 1998                    100,000                         $ 4.00
March 29, 1999                      125,000                         $11.75
                                ---------------
Total                               575,000
</TABLE>

     The Compensation Committee (the "Committee") and the Board of Directors of
the Company (the "Board") have agreed to amend the Options to extend the post-
termination exercise period (but not beyond the expiration of the Option term).
The parties understand that this amendment of the Options is considered a new
option grant  for tax purposes under Section 424 of the Internal Revenue Code
(the "Code"), so that (i) the holding period for incentive stock options shall
re-commence as of the date of this amendment and (ii) a portion of the Options
shall be treated as non-qualified stock options as a result of the application
of the $100,000 limit on incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code.

     NOW  THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Grant Agreements are hereby
amended as follows:

          Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the above-
     referenced Option Agreements, if there is a termination of the Optionee's
     employment for any reason other than Cause, the Options shall terminate at
     the earlier of the following: (i) two years from date of such termination
     or (ii) the expiration of the Options term.
<PAGE>

In all respects not amended, the Options are hereby ratified and confirmed and
all Options which were previously vested shall remain vested notwithstanding
anything contained herein.

WITNESS the following signatures.

     Zany Brainy, Inc.


     By:___________________________               ___________
                                                  Date

     ______________________________               ___________
     Thomas G. Vellios                            Date
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27059-27060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13551]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1503-000]


Eagle Gas Marketing Company; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 23, 1996.
    On April 4, 1996, Eagle Gas Marketing Company (Eagle) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Eagle will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. Eagle also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Eagle requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR 
Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by Eagle.
    On May 8, 1996, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:

[[Page 27060]]

    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Eagle should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Eagle is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Eagle's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 7, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13551 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13113]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32, 092]


Superior Garments Inc., Winder, GA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 25, 1996 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on February 29, 1996 on behalf of workers at Superior 
Garments Inc., Winder, Georgia.
    All workers were separated from the subject firm on February 2, 
1996 more than one year prior to the date of the petition. Section 223 
of the Acts specifies that no certification may apply to any worker 
whose last separation occurred more than one year before the date of 
the petition. Consequently, further investigation in this case would 
serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 13th day of May, 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-13113 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned officers of Uranium Hunter Corporation (the "Company"), does herebycertify, to such officer's knowledge, that: 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complieswith the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Dated: May 19, 2009 

/s/ Reno J. Calabrigo                      Reno J. Calabrigo Chief Executive Officer Uranium Hunter Corporation 

Dated: May 19, 2009 

/s/ Rakesh Malhotra                       Rakesh Malhotra Chief Financial Officer Uranium Hunter Corporation 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Uranium Hunter Corporation and will be retainedby Uranium Hunter Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13637]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 10856 Michigan]


Upper Peninsula Power Company; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

May 24, 1996.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for an original 
license for the Au Train Hydroelectric Project, located near the towns 
of Au Train and Munising, Michigan in Alger County, and has prepared a 
Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the project. In the DEA, the 
Commission's staff has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of 
the un-licensed, existing project and has concluded that approval of 
the project, with appropriate environmental protection or enhancement 
measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
    Any comments should be filed within 45 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426. Please affix ``Au Train Hydroelectric Project No. 10856'' to all 
comments. For further information, please contact John Blair at (202) 
219-2845.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13637 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy FRANKLIN, Appellant.

No. WD 53088.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 25, 1997.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, C.J., P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of robbery, first degree, § 569.020, RSMo., 1994, a Class A felony, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo., 1994.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13516]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324]


Carolina Power & Light Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Carolina Power & Light Company (the licensee) to 
withdraw its December 29, 1992, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62 for the Brunswick 
Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2, located in Brunswick County, North 
Carolina.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Type A test 
acceptance criterion for the as found containment integration leakage 
rate from 0.75 La to 1.0 La (and 0.75 Lt to 1.0 Lt) that represents the 
maximum allowable containment leakage rate.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on June 23, 
1993, (58 FR 34070). However, by letter dated January 30, 1995, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated December 29, 1992, and the licensee's 
letter dated January 30, 1995, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. The above documents are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
document room located at the University of North Carolina at 
Wilmington, William Madison Randall Library, 601 S. College Road, 
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-3297.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of May 1996.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda L. Mozafari,
Project Manager, Project Directorate II-1, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 96-13516 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6132

CALVIN EUGENE SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District

Judge. (CA-98-1132-5)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Eugene Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Smith v. United States, No. CA-98-1132-5 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 22, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40892

OSCAR GABRIEL JIMINEZ; CHANDRA RAE JIMENEZ,

Plaintiffs ! Appellees

vs.

WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS; SHERIFF DWAINE DAUGHERTY

Defendants ! Appellants

- - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

- - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 22, 2010, 5 Cir., 2010, _____F.3d____)

BEFORE: JONES, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA,

BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD,

SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the

petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit

judges in regular active service and not disqualified having

voted in favor,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court

en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The

Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 18, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
**CERTIFICATION**

|   |   |   | Date: November 10, 2006                                                                                                                |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                   |
|        |   |   | /s/              Jerald L.              Fenstermaker                                                                                   |
|        |   |   | Jerald                L. Fenstermaker,President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

|   |   |   | Date: November 10, 2006                                                                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                               |
|        |   |   | /s/              Daniel F.              Graham                                                                     |
|        |   |   | Daniel                F. Graham,Chief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandro Natale, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
      January 12,
      2011
                /s/ Sandro NataleSandro
      NataleChief
      Executive Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-15875

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00034-SPM-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

PHILLIP WILLIAM WINTERS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(July 11, 2013)

Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 12-15875 Date Filed: 07/11/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Phillip William Winters, in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winters=s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-15875 Date Filed: 07/11/2013 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of American
Racing Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:    September 7, 2006          By:    /s/D.  Davy Jones
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  D. Davy Jones
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Racing Capital,
Inc. and will be retained by American Racing Capital, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12674]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-128-002]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Cashout Report

May 15, 1996.
    Take Notice that on May 13, 1996, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee) tendered for filing a report of cashout 
activity for the November 1993 through October 1994 period.
    East Tennessee states that the cashout report reflects a total 
cashout loss during this period of $180,752.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before May 
22, 1996. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12674 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 30, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 30, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0105. Z-SPACE INC et al. v. DANTANNAS CNN CENTER, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

17A07035