alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Edward J. Geletka, President and Chief Executive Officer and L. Joseph Stella,
III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Colonial
Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his capacity as an officer of
the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and that:

(1)     the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.


August 8, 2005                           /s/ Edward J. Geletka
----------------------                   ---------------------
Date                                     Edward J. Geletka,
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


August 8, 2005                           /s/ L. Joseph Stella, III
----------------------                   -------------------------
Date                                     L. Joseph Stella, III,
                                         Executive Vice President and Chief
                                         Financial Officer

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Colonial Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Colonial
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       25
Via Texas E-filing 

April 27, 2015

Honorable Christopher A. Prine 

Clerk of the Court 

First Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin Street 

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Re: No. 79750-CV, DONALD B. MULLINS and BLUE SKY RIGHT OF WAY, 

L.L.C. v. MARTINEZ ROW f/k/a and MARTINEZ INVESTMENTS; IN 

THE DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS 149th 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT; On Appeal to FIRST COURT OF APPEALS, 

CAUSE NO. 01-15-00152-CV

Dear Mr. Prine: 

In further response to the court’s letter dated March 27, 2015.

1. Appellants have ascertained that a brief Reporter’s Record was created on November 10, 

2014, and/or February 10, 2015, in the 149th District Court. These are the hearing dates in

the trial court for the orders and judgment on appeal. 

2. Appellants will immediately transmit payment to the court reporter for transcripts of 

these hearings on receipt of the estimate for preparation of these items. 

3. Upon receipt of an estimated filing date for the Reporter’s Records, Appellants will file a 

motion to conform the Appellants’ initial briefing deadline to the estimated filing date. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Patrick F. Timmons, Jr. 

cc: Ms. Leslie Shores 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00152-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/27/2015 4:55:01 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/27/2015 4:55:01 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Exhibit 99.2

|PEC Solutions, Inc. |  | [PEC LOGO] |  | 12730 Fair Lakes Circle
Fairfax, VA 22003            
|------------------- |  | ---------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |            |  | 703-679-4900 voice
703-679-4901 facsimile
www.pec.com

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I,
Stuart R. Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):



|/s/STUART R. LLOYD |  |                
|------------------ |  | ---------------
|Name:              |  | Stuart R. Lloyd
|Date:              |  | April 17, 2003 

---

QuickLinks
NOTE                   Exhibit 10.25



$40,000                                               Date: September 22, 2000


     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,   Archer  Systems  Limited,   Inc.,  the  undersigned
("Payor"),  hereby  promises  to pay to the order of  Richard J.  Margulies,  an
individual,  ("Holder"), the principal amount of $40,000.00, payable twenty four
(24) months after the date first set forth above.  The  principal  amount hereof
from time to time  outstanding  shall bear  interest  at the rate of six percent
(6%) per annum,  payable on the date set forth  above.  All  payments  hereunder
shall be in lawful  money of the United  States of America at the address of the
Holder  hereof or at such  address as shall be specified by the Holder to Archer
Systems Limited, Inc.
     If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or principal,  then
the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of its legal rights
to collect  the  balance due unless  within  five (5)  business  days after such
notice the default  shall be cured by Payor.  Such notice  shall be deemed given
three (3) days after having been  deposited in the United  States Mail  properly
addressed  and  sent by  registered  mail to the  particular  addressee,  return
receipt requested.

     Prepayments may be made in this note  voluntarily at any time and from time
to time, without penalty.



                                                Archer Systems Limited, Inc.


                                                BY:/s/Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                --------------------------
                                                      Secretary/Treasurer


                                        3
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony LYLES, Appellant.

No. 62922.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 16, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 16, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 25, 1994.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David B. Cosgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Anthony Lyles, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of involuntary manslaughter. Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years. ■

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )) Plaintiff, )) v. ) CR 01-618-PHX-EHC ) Hugo Armando Ramirez-Machado, ) DETENTION ORDER

) Defendant. ) _________________________________________)

 On February 17, 2006, defendant Hugo Armando Ramirez-Machado appeared

before this Court on a petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court

considered the information provided to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in

determining whether the defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court.

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed

on supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a

petition to revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing

evidence that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if

released pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142(b) or (c).

 

Case 2:01-cr-00618-EHC Document 25 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings. 18 U.S.C. §3143, Rule 46(c), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure.

 DATED this 27th day of February, 2006.

Case 2:01-cr-00618-EHC Document 25 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 17    Viasystems, Inc. 101 South Hanley Road Suite 400 St. Louis,  MO  63105   March 27, 2009   Mr. Peter R. Frank GSC Partners 500 Campus Drive Suite 220 Florham Park, NJ 07932  Dear Mr. Frank:  Under Item 5.02(a)(3)(ii) of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), Viasystems is required to provide you with an advance copy of the disclosure it will make relative to your resignation from the Board of Directors for your comments or approval.  Please take a minute to review the attached, and if it is acceptable, sign and send back to me the enclosed copy of this letter.  If it is not acceptable, please indicate any changes that you request us to make and send the same back to my attention.  Also enclosed is a Director Resignation for your signature.  Please sign this as well and return it to me.  Thanks for your time in looking at this quickly.  Take care and good luck.  Sincerely,  /s/ Daniel J. Weber  Daniel J. Weber  I, Peter R. Frank, have been granted the opportunity to review the enclosed disclosure to the Securities and Exchange Commission and by signing this letter hereby give my approval of the disclosure as it has been presented to me.    /s/ Peter R. Frank________ Peter R. Frank  EXHIBIT 17   DIRECTOR RESIGNATION  I hereby resign as a member of the Boards of Directors of Viasystems Group, Inc. and Viasystems, Inc.  Such resignations are effective March 27, 2009.   Dated:  March 27, 2009     /s/Peter R. Frank___________________ Peter R. Frank
EXHIBIT 32.1 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Golden Opportunities Corporation, for the period ending July 31 , 2011, I, Michael Zahorik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Golden Opportunities Corporation hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
  1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golden Opportunities Corporation.
  Date: October 31, 2011
 /s/ Michael ZahorikMichael ZahorikChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 of Xinhua China Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Xianping Wang, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 		
Dated: November 9, 2005                                                      /s/ Xianping Wang                                                                                                    Xianping Wang, President, CEO and a 			                                                                                  Director
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

501 

CAF 14-02288 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF IAN WALKER, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SUNSHINE CARROLL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

BENNETT SCHECHTER ARCURI & WILL, LLP, BUFFALO (ANDREW F. EMBORSKY OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

LYDIA V. EVANS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FREDONIA. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County

(Judith S. Claire, J.), entered June 24, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant

to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, awarded

petitioner sole custody of the subject child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, respondent mother appeals from an

order that, inter alia, granted petitioner father’s petition seeking

sole custody of the parties’ child. In appeal No. 2, the mother

appeals from an order that denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b)

and 5015 (a) to vacate the order that is the subject of appeal No. 1. 

Contrary to the mother’s contention in appeal No. 1, “this

proceeding involves an initial court determination with respect to

custody and, [a]lthough the parties’ informal arrangement is a factor

to be considered, [the father] is not required to prove a substantial

change in circumstances in order to warrant a modification thereof”

(Matter of DeNise v DeNise, 129 AD3d 1539, 1539-1540 [internal

quotation marks omitted]). Contrary to the mother’s further

contention, affording great deference to Family Court’s assessment of

witness credibility, we conclude that the court’s determination that

the best interests of the child would be best served by awarding

custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record

(see Matter of Thillman v Mayer, 85 AD3d 1624, 1625). We likewise

affirm the order in appeal No. 2. Even assuming, arguendo, that the

mother’s request for relief under CPLR 4404 (b) was timely pursuant to

CPLR 4405, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in
-2- 501 

CAF 14-02288 

denying the motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b) and 5015 (a) (see Matter

of Ramsey H. [Benjamin K.], 99 AD3d 1040, 1043, lv denied 20 NY3d 858;

Marine Midland Bank v Cramer, 177 AD2d 1009, 1009, lv dismissed 79

NY2d 915). 

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:17-cv-04291-MHB Document 1-1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 29 of 29
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                                AMENDMENT #1 TO
                                      THE
                             OEM PURCHASE AND SALE
                                   AGREEMENT
                                BY AND BETWEEN
                                NORTEL NETWORKS
                                      AND
                              CHORUM TECHNOLOGIES


This amendment (the "Amendment") is made this 12th day of October, 2000 (the
"Effective Date") by and between Nortel Networks, Ltd., having an office at 8200
Dixie Road, Brampton, Ontario L6T 5P6 ("Nortel") and Chorum Technologies, Inc.
("Seller") having an office at 1303 E. Arapaho Road, Richardson, Texas 75081.

     Whereas, Nortel and Seller entered into an OEM Purchase and Sale Agreement,
effective as of 1 January 2000 (the "OEM Agreement"), and,

     Whereas, the parties desire that this Amendment revise the OEM Agreement.

Now therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which the parties acknowledge, the parties hereby amend the OEM Agreement as
follows:

1.   Insert the following as Section 8.5.6:

     [*]

All capitalized terms herein will have the meaning set forth in the OEM
Agreement.  Except as specifically provided above, the OEM Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect without modification.

THE REST OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK; THE NEXT PAGE IS THE
SIGNATURE PAGE.

* Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been
requested with respect to the omitted portions.

<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment #1 on the
day and year last written below.

CHORUM TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED        NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED

By:                                     By:
   ----------------------------            ----------------------------
        (Signature)                           (Signature)
Name:                                   Name:
     --------------------------              --------------------------

Title:                                  Title:
      --------------------------              -------------------------
        (Print)                               (Print)

Date:                                   Date:
     ---------------------------             --------------------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Maxxon,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Rondald L. Wheet
, Chief Executive Officer (and principal  financial  officer) of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


April 11, 2006                    /s/ Rondald L. Wheet
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Rondald L. Wheet,
                                  Chief Executive Officer and principal
                                  financial officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30771

 

ELTON DEVILLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FALCO LIME, INC.; CRAIG W. MARKS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-379

- - - - - - - - - -

February 19, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that the application of Elton Deville for

leave to file his brief in its present form is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Deville’s motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED, because his appeal

lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. See Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal

is frivolous, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. 
No. 96-30771

- 2 -

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The district court did not err by granting

summary judgment to the appellees on Deville’s claims that they 

obtained other judgments against him by improper means.

We caution Deville that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions Deville is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 4

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC Document 291-4 Filed 01/10/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC Document 291-4 Filed 01/10/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroGrow International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, H. MacGregor Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.





Date:  August 12, 2010
By:
/s/ H. MacGregor ClarkeH. MacGregor ClarkeChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)