alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Earl STRAWN, Claimant/Appellant, v. ROY ELAM MASONRY, Employer/Respondent, and The Ohio Casualty Group, Insurer/Respondent.

No. 64670.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 3, 1994.

Earl Strawn, pro se.

Harlan and Harlan, Daniel J. Harlan, St. Louis, for employer-respondent.

*604Before SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and CRANDALL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming, as modified, the award of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

The ALJ found that appellant sustained an injury to his low back on November 4, 1985 arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment, and that as a result of this injury, he suffered a 12.5% permanent partial disability of the low back for which he was entitled to compensation for 50 weeks at $150.33 per week, or a total of $7,516.50. The ALJ also found that appellant had already received $1062.21, $233.84 per week for 4.52 weeks, for temporary total disability, and that he was not entitled to additional temporary total disability benefits.

The Commission modified the ALJ’s award of permanent partial disability to 25%, for a total of $15,033.00. The Commission also modified the ALJ’s award limiting temporary total disability, finding that appellant is entitled to 8 and 1/7 weeks of total temporary disability, as opposed to the 4.52 weeks for which he had already been paid. The Commission found that appellant “is entitled to $1,904.13 in temporary total disability, minus the $1062.21 already paid, which calculates to an additional $841.92.” Further, the Commission clarified that any past due compensation shall bear interest from-the due date until paid. The Commission affirmed the award of the ALJ as modified.

The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, John A. Roberts, the Chief Financial Officer of InfoLogix, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 14, 2008

 

 
| /s/ John A. Roberts     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| John A. Roberts         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mikkel Jordahl, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

Mark Brnovich, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-08263-PCT-DJH

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came for consideration before the Court. The 

issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court’s Order filed 

January 28, 2020, judgment of dismissal is entered and this action is hereby terminated. 

Debra D. Lucas

District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

January 28, 2020

s/ L. Figueroa

By: Deputy Clerk

Case 3:17-cv-08263-DJH Document 87 Filed 01/28/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.50

INTERCOMPANY SERVICES EXTENSION AGREEMENT

This Extension Agreement dated as of January 1, 2011 is by and between Hallmark Cards, Incorporated ("Hallmark") and Crown Media
Holdings, Inc. (Crown Holdings").

WHEREAS,
Crown Holdings and Hallmark have previously entered into that certain Intercompany Services Agreement between the parties dated as of December 23, 2002 as extended on
January 1, 2006, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2008, January 1, 2010, and as extended and amended on January 1, 2009 and May 1, 2010 (the "Services Agreement");
and

WHEREAS,
the parties desire to further extend the term of the Services Agreement;

NOW,
THEREFORE, Crown Holdings and Hallmark hereby agree as follows:

The
term of the Services Agreement shall be extended for an additional period terminating on December 31, 2011, subject to any earlier termination pursuant to the terms of the
Services Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Services Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension Agreement as of the date set forth above.

HALLMARK CARDS, INCORPORATEDBy:

/s/ BRIAN GARDNERTitle:

Executive Vice PresidentCROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.By:

/s/ CHARLES STANFORDTitle:

EVP & General Counsel


---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

DAVID POMERANTZDavid PomerantzPrincipal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerDated: April 14, 2008















---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Capella Education Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Shank, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN G.
SHANK                              
|Stephen G. Shank Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|March 5, 2008                                        

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of DDi Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Gisch, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|/s/    JOSEPH P. GISCH                                           
|                                                                 
|Joseph P. Gisch Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March
30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27904-27905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13735]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 27905]]


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the meeting of the National Cancer 
Institute Board of Scientific Advisors Prevention Program Working 
Group, June 13, 1996 at The DoubleTree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    This meeting will be open to the public on June 13, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 9:30 a.m. for overview and discussion of the Institute's Prevention 
Program.
    The meeting will be closed to the public on June 13, from 9:30 a.m. 
to adjournment for discussion of confidential issues relating to the 
review, discussion and evaluation of individual programs and projects 
conducted by the Clinical Trials Extramural Program. These discussions 
will reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information including consideration 
of personnel qualifications and performance, the competence of 
individual investigators and similar matters, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Information pertaining to the meeting may be obtained from Dr. Jack 
Gruber, Executive Secretary, National Cancer Institute Prevention 
Program Working Group, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
EPN, Rm 540, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301-496-9740). Individuals who plan 
to attend and need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations should contact Dr. 
Jack Gruber in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: May 23, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13735 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 461 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 461

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 2, 2009.
Whereas in 2003, Sentinels of Freedom, based in San Ramon and Danville, 
        California, was established;
Whereas the mission of Sentinels of Freedom is to provide life-changing 
        opportunities for men and women who served in the Unites States Armed 
        Forces and who have suffered severe injuries;
Whereas the Sentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation was created to benefit 
        qualified veterans severely injured in the line of duty on or after 
        September 11, 2001;
Whereas Sentinels of Freedom provides four-year scholarships that help veterans 
        to become self-sufficient;
Whereas scholarship recipients receive support to enroll in school, find and 
        maintain a job, and obtain housing;
Whereas Sentinels of Freedom organizes teams of local volunteers that provide 
        mentoring and moral support for scholarship recipients;
Whereas Sentinels of Freedom has excelled in providing assistance to veterans; 
        and
Whereas thanks to Sentinels of Freedom, 39 veterans have benefitted from 
        scholarships and many more will in the coming years: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Sentinels of Freedom;
            (2) commends Sentinels of Freedom's dedication and commitment to the 
        brave men and women who have served the United States; and
            (3) praises Sentinels of Freedom for its extraordinary work for the 
        well-being of the Nation's veterans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 4436** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SABU ABDUL JAUHARI , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 4:08

- cr - 00055

- RGD

- TEM

- 1 )

Submitted : August 27, 2010 Decided: September 10 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published p er curiam opinion
.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Frances H. Pratt, Keith Loren Kimball, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Gary G. Grindler, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Lanny A. Breuer, Assistant Attorney General, J. Cam Barker, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bi nding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sabu Abdul Jauhari pled guilty to being a felon in possession a weapon and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S .C.
§§ 922(g), 924(a)(2) ( 2006 ) and was sentenced to sixty months of imprisonment. On appeal, Jauh ari contends that his sentence was improperly enhanced, under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“ USSG ”) § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (2008), because his prior Virginia conviction for larceny from a person did not qualify as a violent felony. For the reasons that fol low, we affirm. Jauhari argues that this c ourt’s opinion in United States v. Smith , 359 F.3d 662 (4t h Cir. 2004) , finding that the Virginia offense of larceny from a person was a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, is no longer good law following the Supreme Court’s opinions in Chambers v. United
States , 555 U.S. __, 129 S. Ct. 687 (2009) , and Begay v. United
States , 128 S. Ct. 1581 (2008)
. **∗** Jauhari’s argument, however, is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. Jarmon , 596 F.3d 228 (4th Cir. 2010), petition for cert. filed , __ U.S.L.W. __ (U.S. May

**∗** Because the language defining a violent felony in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) is nearly identical to the language defining a crime of violence in USSG § 4B1.2(a), this c ourt looks to its case law interpreting both provisions whe n examining whether a prior crime involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical injury to another. United States v. Rivers , 595 F.3d 558, 560 n.1 (4th Cir. 2010)
.3 25, 2010) (No. 09

- 11134) . In Jarmon , we re a ffirmed ou r opinion in Smith and found that larceny from a person , under North Carolina law , i s a crime of violence within the meaning of USSG § 4B1.2(a)(2). 596 F.3d at 2 32

- 33. Accordingly, we affirm Jauhari’s sentence . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not ai d the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Georgina Warren, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-17-8315-PCT-SPL 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On July 24, 2018, defendant, Georgina Warren, through a formal written motion 

filed by her counsel regarding a petition to revoke conditions of release, submitted the issue 

to the Court. The Court considered the information provided to the Court in determining 

whether the defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant has violated 

the conditions of release and that there is no condition or combination of conditions 

available to the Court. 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 26th day of July, 2018.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1. Defendant Sean Fox ("Defendant") waives service of a summons and the

complaint in this action, enters a general appearance, and admits the Court's jurisdiction 

over Defendant and over the subject matter of this action. 

2. Defendant has pleaded guilty to criminal conduct relating to certain matters

alleged in the complaint in this action. Specifically, in United States v. Lanny Brown, et. 

al, Crim. No. _____ Defendant pleaded guilty to violations of Sections 1 O(b) and 

32 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [ 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 

78ffJ, and Rule lOb-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.lOb-5]. This Consent shall remain in 

full and effect regardless of the existence or outcome of any further proceedings in 

United States v. Lanny Brown, et. al. 

3. Defendant hereby consents to the entry of the final Judgment in the form

attached hereto (the "Final Judgment") and incorporated by reference herein, which, 

among other things: 

a) permanently restrains and enjoins Defendant from violation of Section

IO(b) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule lOb-5 

thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240. lOb-5]; and 

b) orders Defendant to pay disgorgement in the amount of $369,720, plus

prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $43,147.79, with a credit 

of $298,503.24, the total adjusted amount of criminal money judgment 

agreed upon in United States v. Lanny Brown, et. al., so that Defendant 

shall pay a net disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $114,364.55, 

2 Consent to Entry of Judgment 

17-CR-01423

Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6-1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 2 of 7
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joshua W. Carden, SBN 021698

Joshua Carden Law Firm, P.C.

16427 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 410 

Scottsdale, AZ 85254

joshua@cardenlawfirm.com

(480) 454-1100 

(480) 454-1101 (Fax)

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joseph Sorge,

Plaintiff,

v.

Yelp, Inc., 

Defendant.

No. 2:17-cv-04518-JJT

PLAINTIFF’S RULE 26(A)(3) 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Plaintiff, Joseph Sorge, hereby provides the following disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(3) 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Court order. Note: as discovery is ongoing, this 

statement may still require supplementation upon receipt of documents from Defendants. 

A. WITNESSES PLAINTIFF EXPECTS TO CALL AT TRIAL.

1. Plaintiff Joseph Sorge – c/o Plaintiff’s counsel

2. Jonel Kejee – only email address known at this juncture (also known to Defendant)

3. Matthew Susa – c/o Defendant’s counsel

4. Lucy Salazar – c/o Defendant’s counsel

B. WITNESSES PLAINTIFF MAY CALL AT TRIAL

1. Abby Kennedy – c/o Defendant’s counsel

2. D. Randall Meagher – c/o Defendant’s counsel

3. Amber Sutton – c/o Defendant’s counsel

4. Heather Webb – c/o Defendant’s counsel
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. Any necessary custodian of documents

6. All witnesses disclosed by Defendants

C. WITNESSES WHOSE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY PLAINTIFF EXPECTS TO 

PRESENT AT TRIAL 

None anticipated at this time, but any party deposition may be used as impeachment. 

D. DOCUMENTS OR EXHIBITS PLAINTIFF EXPECT TO OFFER AT TRIAL. 

Document Bates Label

Notice of Suit Rights EEOC11-12

Intake Form EEOC15-21

Charge of Discrimination EEOC32

Position Statement EEOC40-50

Activity Log EEOC1-2

Sorge Pictures SORGE00070-72

Sorge Video Recordings (three .MOV files) N/A

Email Yelp53-54

Email Yelp57

Email Yelp62

Email Yelp64

Offer Yelp1-3

Email Yelp42

Grow your Career Yelp33

Yelp Separation Agreement (unsigned) Unavailable

Bank of America communications Sorge141-143

Recording of “Straight to the Bank” (Explicit) 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaMzgIof6iQ Unavailable

Any document identified by Defendant
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 12th day of October, 2018,

Joshua Carden Law Firm, P.C.

By: s/Joshua W. Carden

Joshua W. Carden

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Joseph Sorge
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the 12th day of October, 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF version 

of this document to the Office of the Clerk of the Court, using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants listed for this matter, 

including:

L. Eric Dowell

Alexandra J. Gill

Ogletree Deakins

Esplanade Center III

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800,

Phoenix, AZ 85016

Attorneys for Defendant

/s/Joshua W. Carden