U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Alfieri, Josephitem
                                            Kustas, William

                                                         - *Bill*item
                                            Prueger, Johnitem
                                            HIPPS, LAWRENCE - Utah State Universityitem
                                            CHAVEZ, JOSE - Colorado State Universityitem
                                            French, Andrewitem
                                            Evett, Steven

                                                         - *Steve*
  Submitted to: Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Technology
                                    Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 7/19/2011
                                    Publication  Date: 11/1/2011
                                    Citation: Alfieri, J.G., Kustas, W.P., Prueger, J.H., Hipps, L.E., Chavez, J.L., French, A.N., Evett, S.R. 2011. Intercomparison of nine micrometeorological stations during the BEAREX08 Field Campaign. Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Technology. 28:390-406.Interpretive Summary: Land surface conditions, such as the type and amount of vegetation, play a critical role in controlling the exchange of heat and moisture between the land surface and the atmosphere. In turn, the exchange of heat and moisture regulates a broad range of meteorological, hydrological and environmental processes such as water loss from agricultural fields and its influence on downwind precipitation and impacts on water resources. In order to model the impacts of land surface conditions on land-atmosphere exchange and subsequent effects on the environment, it is first necessary to quantify the uncertainty in the field measurements from different sensor systems used for model validation. Using data collected as a part of the 2008 Bushland Evapotranspiration and Agricultural Remote Sensing Experiment (BEAREX08), measurements from nine co-located eddy covariance (EC) systems measuring heat, water and energy flux exchange across the land-atmosphere interface were compared with the two-fold objective of (1) characterizing the inter-instrument variation in the measurements, and (2) quantifying the error in the measurements from each system. The results show that magnitude and cause of measurement error varied significantly among the different EC systems. It also showed that the error estimates derived from the commonly applied Ordinary Least Squares linear regression (OLS) tended to be 10% to 20% greater than those derived from Errors-in-Variables linear regression (EIV). This is largely due to the ability of EIV linear regression to account for the error in the predictor variable.  As a result, the use of EIV provides a more realistic way of determining measurement uncertainty and its impact on model calibration and validation.
                                Technical Abstract: Land-atmosphere interactions play a critical role in regulating numerous meteorological, hydrological and environmental processes. Investigating these processes often requires multiple measurement sites representing a range of surface conditions. Before these measurements can be compared, however, it is imperative that the differences between the instrumentation are fully understood. Using micrometeorological data collected as a part of the 2008 Bushland Evapotranspiration and Agricultural Remote Sensing Experiment (BEAREX08), measurements from nine co-located eddy covariance (EC) systems were compared with the two-fold objective of (1) characterizing the inter-instrument variation in the measurements, and (2) quantifying the error in the measurements from each system. Focusing on four quantities – the sensible and latent heat flux, Carbon Dioxide density, and net radiation – this study also evaluates two well-established regression methods to determine the appropriateness for use with micrometeorological data. These methods are Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Errors-In-Variable (EIV) linear regression. The results show that magnitude and cause of measurement error varied significantly among the different EC systems. It also showed that the error estimates derived from OLS linear regression tended to be 10% to 20% greater than those derived from EIV linear regression. This is largely due to the ability of EIV linear regression to account for the error in the predictor variable. Also, EIV linear regression allows for reliable estimates of the actual value that a highly consistent from system-to-system. As a result, the relationship between the measured and actual quantities derived from EIV linear regression could be used to adjust BEAREX08 data collected after the intercomparison period to account for measurement errors.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov