alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Eduardo GALLEGOS, Appellee.

No. 04-91-00284-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

Oct. 30, 1992.

*776Edel P. Ruiseco, Corpus Christi, Charles G. Childress, Asst. Atty. Gen., Child Support Enforcement Div., Austin, for appellant.

Armando Trevino, Ramos-Trevino, Laredo, for appellee.

Before BUTTS, GARCIA and PRESTON H. DIAL, JJ.

OPINION

PRESTON H. DIAL, Assigned Justice.1

This is an appeal from an award of attorney’s fees in a paternity suit. We will sustain point of error number four and reverse and render a take-nothing judgment.

The Child Support Enforcement Division of the Attorney General’s Office filed a suit seeking to establish that the appellee Eduardo Gallegos was the father of two named children. Gallegos filed a general denial and special exceptions. The court entered an order for paternity testing, the results of which excluded Gallegos as the possible biological father.

On November 29, 1990, the State filed a motion to dismiss its petition. On the same date, Gallegos’s attorney filed a motion for attorney’s fees which was set for hearing on January 3, 1991.

On December 4, 1990, the court entered an order dismissing the State’s petition “with prejudice as to Eduardo Gallegos.”

On January 3, 1991, the court held a hearing on the motion for attorney’s fees. At the conclusion of the hearing, the motion was not ruled upon. The court, however, gave the appellee ten days to file a brief on the question. On February 15, 1991, the trial court signed an instrument denominated “JUDGMENT,” which awarded $1,500.00 in attorney’s fees to appellee Gallegos.

We view the court’s order of December 4, 1990, as a final order terminating the law suit. *See*Tex.R.Civ.P. 162 & 163. Rule 162 notes that a dismissal under that rule shall have no effect on any motion for attorney's fees pending at the time of the dismissal.

The hearing on the motion for attorney’s fees on January 3, 1991, was within the 30 day period of plenary power of the trial court following the entry of the final order terminating the law suit. No motion for new trial or motion to modify, correct, or reform the December 4, 1990 judgment, which would have extended the period of plenary power longer than 30 days, was filed in this suit. The hearing on January 3, 1991, where the motion for attorney’s fees was not ruled upon, was the last day of plenary power of the trial court. Any action taken after that day would be after the expiration of the trial court’s jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we hold that the judgment of the trial court for attorney’s fees entered on February 15, 1991, was erroneous because the jurisdiction of the court had expired. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment that the appellee Eduardo Gallegos take nothing.

1

. Assigned to this case by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 74.003(b) (Vernon 1988).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13881]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Delegation of Authority To Issue Subpoenas

AGENCY: Office of the Inspector General, Social Security Administration 
(SSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice of the Inspector General's delegation of authority to 
issue subpoenas.

EFFECTIVE DATES: This notice is effective on June 4, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith A. Kidwell, Office of the 
Inspector General, (410) 965-9750.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 29, 1996, the Inspector General 
of the Social Security Administration delegated the authority to issue 
subpoenas to the Deputy Inspector General, the Assistant Inspector 
General for Investigations, and the Deputy Assistant Inspector General 
for Investigations, in accordance with the authority set forth in 
section (6)(a)(4) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, Public Law 95-
452, as amended by Public Law 100-504 (codified at 5 U.S.C. App.). 
Specifically, section 6(a)(4) authorizes the Inspector General to 
subpoena the production of all information, documents, reports, 
answers, records, accounts, papers and other data and documentary 
evidence necessary to perform the functions assigned to the Inspector 
General.
    This delegation of authority does not limit the Inspector General's 
authority to issue subpoenas.
    This delegation revokes and supersedes all previous delegations 
pertaining to this subject. Any actions taken in reliance upon 
superseded delegations of this authority are hereby adopted and 
ratified.

    Dated: May 28, 1996.
David C. Williams,
Inspector General.
[FR Doc. 96-13881 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
1 WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

1 O United States of America, No. CR-17-08286-001-PCT-CRP 

11 Plaintiff, ORDER 

12 v. 

13 Eric Joe, 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendant. 

Defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. § 3141 et. seq. a 

·detention hearing was held. The defendant is ordered detained pending an intake 

assessment for placement at Crossroads in Phoenix, Arizona or other facility as 

designated by Pretrial Services. Should defendant qualify for such placement, defendant 

shall be released upon conditions set by this Court, including pretrial residency at said 

facility, as conditions do exist which would reasonably assure the safety of others and the 

appearance of the defendant. Should defendant not so qualify, the release conditions set 

by this Court shall be vacated and defendant shall be detained pending trial as there are 

no conditions or combination of conditions which would reasonably assure the safety of 

others or the appearance of the defendant. 

The Pretrial Services Officer is ordered to timely notify this Court of the 

defendant's intake assessment results, and if found acceptable, the date and time the 

II 
1 facility will provide transportation froJ,TI the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse for the 

· 2 defendant. 

3 Dated this 22nd day ofNovember, 2017. 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11-

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26. 

27 

28 

- 2 -

'~
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David T. Gulian, the Chief Executive Officer of InfoLogix, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 15, 2009

 

 
| /s/ David T. Gulian                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| David T. Gulian                        |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5969 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to revise certain regulations to permit certain children to accompany 

their parents or legal guardians through Global Entry 

airport lanes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 5969 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Travel for 

3 Families Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF GLOBAL ENTRY TO CERTAIN CHIL5 DREN. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu7 rity shall revise section 235.12 of title 8, Code of Federal 

8 Regulations, to permit a child who is 10 years old or 

9 younger who is not a member of Global Entry in accord10 ance with such section and who is traveling with such 

11 child’s parent or legal guardian who is a member of Global 

12 Entry in accordance with such section to accompany such 

13 parent or legal guardian through a Global Entry lane upon 

14 arrival at an international airport in the United States. 

15 (b) APPOINTMENTS.—The Secretary of Homeland 

16 Security shall take such actions as may be necessary to 

17 permit a parent or legal guardian of up to four children 

18 described in subsection (a) who is applying for member19 ship in Global Entry on behalf of such children to schedule 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 5969 RFS

1 a single appointment for an interview relating to such 

2 membership for all such children. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David L. Osborn, the President of
Hudson's Grill International, Inc., certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | (Registrant)

HUDSON'S GRILL INTERNATIONAL,
INC.

By: s/s David L. Osborn

David L. Osborn, President

Date: March 31, 2006
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

f\sec\o01.051231
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant, v. Brian D. SCHAEFER, Respondent.

No. 89-SC-000081-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 4, 1989.

OPINION AND ORDER

On March 30, 1977, the respondent was indicted for the offense of bribery and for solicitation of perjury. He was convicted of bribery, a Class D felony, and sentenced to one year imprisonment. He was temporarily suspended from the practice of law as a result of that conviction and remained suspended until his conviction was reversed on appeal, after which he was reinstated.

Respondent was convicted again on a retrial of the charges in 1983, was again suspended temporarily, and his conviction once again was reversed by an appellate *761court, at which time his order of suspension was vacated.

In 1986 the respondent entered a plea of guilty to a charge of tampering with a witness, a Class A misdemeanor, and was sentenced to 12 month’s imprisonment and a fine of $500.00. Again disbarment proceedings were instituted against the respondent, and the Board of Governors has found the respondent guilty of engaging in unethical and unprofessional conduct tending to bring the Bar of Kentucky into disrepute, and by a vote of 17 to 0 recommended his disbarment.

Respondent requested that he be given credit for the actual time which he has been suspended since these hearings began. His request was denied by the Board of Governors.

The respondent has requested review only as to the denial of his request that he be given credit for time actually suspended. He states to the court that he has been under actual suspension for a period of more than five years and that in fact he has not engaged in the practice of law since these proceedings began in 1979.

After consideration of the entire matter, it is ordered that the respondent be, and he is hereby, permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and he is directed to pay the costs of these proceedings. It is further ordered that if the respondent seeks to file an application for reinstatement pursuant to SCR 3.520, he shall be given credit for the time that he has been actually suspended from the practice of law by the orders of this court as a result of these disciplinary proceedings.

Respondent shall notify all clients, if any, for whom he is actively involved in litigation or similar legal matters, of his inability to continue to represent them and of the necessity and urgency of promptly retaining new counsel. Such notification shall be by letter duly placed in the United States mail within 10 days of the date of this order, and respondent shall simultaneously provide a copy of all such letters to the Director of the Association.

STEPHENS, C.J., and COMBS, GANT, LAMBERT and VANCE, JJ., concur.

LEIBSON, J., not sitting.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13104]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Compressed Medical Gas Industry; Public Workshop

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice of public workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of the Southeast Region, and the Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research) is announcing a free public workshop on FDA 
regulatory requirements for the compressed medical gas industry. The 
workshop is designed to assist the industry in complying with 
regulations for manufacturing and repacking medical gases.

DATES: The public workshop will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1996, from 
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The public workshop will be held at the Rural Development 
Center, UGA Cooperative Extension Service, U.S. 41 North and I-75 (exit 
21), Tifton, GA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas B. Brogden or Jackie M. 
Douglas, FDA Atlanta District Office, 225 Tift Ave., rm. 107, Tifton, 
GA 31794, 912-382-5963, FAX 912-386-9610. Those persons interested in 
attending this meeting should FAX their registration including name(s), 
firm name, address, telephone and FAX numbers, and any specific 
questions about the workshop to Douglas B. Brogden or Jackie M. Douglas 
(address above) by May 15, 1996. There is no registration fee for this 
workshop. Advance registration is required. Space is limited and all 
interested parties are encouraged to register early.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  FDA's survey of the medical gas industry 
shows that many medical gas firms are either unaware of applicable 
regulations and guidelines or not in compliance with applicable 
requirements. This workshop is designed to assist the medical gas 
industry in complying with regulations for manufacturing and repacking 
medical gases. This workshop is free of charge to attendees.

    Dated: May 17, 1996.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 96-13104 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mussalina Muhaymin as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of 

Muhammad Abdul Muhaymin Jr.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

City of Phoenix, an Arizona Municipal

Corporation; Antonio Tarango; Officer 

Oswald Grenier; Officer Kevin 

McGowan; Officer Jason Hobe; Officer

Ronaldo Canilao; Officer David Head; 

Officer Susan Heimbinger; Officer James 

Clark; Officer Dennis Lerous; Officer 

Ryan Nielson; Officer Steven Wong; and 

Doe Supervisors 1-5,

Defendants.

Case No.: 17-cv-04565-PHX-SMB

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MEMORANDUM RE: CONFIDENTIAL 

DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION 

TRANSCRIPTS AND VIDEOTAPES

AND

EXPEDITED MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

TO CEASE/DESIST AND REMOVE 

PUBLIC POSTINGS

Pursuant to Defendants City of Phoenix, Antonio Tarango, Oswald Grenier, Kevin 

McGowan, Jason Hobel, Ronaldo Canilao, David Head, Susan Heimbigner, James Clark, 

Dennis Leroux, Ryan Nielsen and Steven Wong (collectively “Phoenix Defendants”) 

Defendants’ Supplement to Memorandum re: Confidential Designation of Deposition 

Transcripts and Videotapes and Expedited Motion for Protective Order and Order to 

Cease/Desist and Remove Public Postings (Dkt. No. ____), and good cause appearing; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant Officers’ deposition transcripts and 

videotapes remain confidential pursuant to this Court’s May 8, 2019 (Doc. 072). 

Case 2:17-cv-04565-SMB Document 179-5 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that this Court will grant Phoenix 

Defendants’ request for an Expedited Protective Order that Plaintiff’s Counsel must remove 

his posts within 24 hours of the entry of this Order. 

Case 2:17-cv-04565-SMB Document 179-5 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MATTHEW GORSKI, *

* No. 13-224V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: March 11, 2014

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which

* respondent does not object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Anne Carrion Toale, Maglio Christopher and Toale, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner;

Ann Donohue Martin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

On March 5, 2014, respondent filed a stipulation of fact concerning final 

attorney’s fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, petitioner informally 

submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent for review. In 

this draft application, petitioner requested $12,311.54 for attorneys’ fees and costs, an 

amount to which respondent does not object. The Court awards this amount.

On March 29, 2013, Matthew Gorski filed a petition for compensation alleging 

that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine that he received on October 22, 2010, caused him to 

suffer a radial nerve injury. Petitioner received compensation based upon proffer. 

Decision, filed Jan. 22, 2014. Because petitioner received compensation, he is entitled to 

an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). 

Petitioner seeks a total of $12,311.54 in attorneys’ fees and costs for his counsel. 

Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states that he incurred 

 

1

The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.
no out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim. Respondent has no 

objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs. 

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $12,311.54 in the form of a check made payable to petitioner 

and petitioner’s attorney, Anne Carrion Toale of the law firm of Maglio 

Christopher and Toale, for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available 

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). 

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matter. 

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-6353. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
Exhibit 10.7.1

October 15, 1999

PAUL R. JOHNSON ("Johnson") hereby grants to Revenge Marine, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Optionee") the right and option to purchase from Johnson Seven
Hundred Thousand (700,000) shares of the common stock of Link Express Delivery
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Link") at a purchase price of $7.50
per share. The purchase price may be paid by cleared funds or by delivery of
shares of common stock of the Optionee, which shall be valued at the bid price
for such stock as of the close of business on the day prior to exercise of this
Option.

This Option may be exercised at any time within six months from the date hereof
by delivery of written notice of such exercise to Johnson. The notification
shall include this Option certificate and payment in full of the purchase price.
Upon receipt of payment in full, Johnson shall promptly issue and deliver a
certificate or certificates representing the shares so purchased and paid for.

This Option may not be transferred without the prior written consent of Johnson,
which consent may be withheld in the sole discretion of Johnson.

The Optionee shall not, by reason of the Option, have any rights of a
shareholder of Link. Upon exercise of the Option, and payment for the shares so
purchased, Optionee shall have all rights of a shareholder of record as to the
shares so purchased.

The number of shares covered by this Option shall not be affected by any stock
dividend, stock split, recapitalization, exchange of shares, reorganization, or
similar change in Link=s structure or its stock.

The exercise of this Option and the transfer of shares hereunder shall be
subject to compliance by Johnson and by the Optionee with all applicable
requirements of laws relating thereto and with all applicable regulations of any
stock exchange on which Link=s stock may be listed at the time of such exercise
and issuance.

The shares transferred pursuant to exercise of this Option shall be Arestricted
stock@ as defined in SEC Rule 144, and the certificates representing the shares
shall bear an appropriate restrictive legend.

This Certificate shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Florida, and venue of any proceedings in connection herewith
shall be in Broward County, Florida.

/s/ Paul R. Johnson
------------------------------
Paul R. Johnson