alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofYour Domain.com (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Xinhua China LTD. (the  "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Xianping  Wang,
Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 9, 2009



                                        By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                            _____________________________
                                                Xianping Wang
                                                Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of New Skies Satellites B.V. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel S. Goldberg, ChiefExecutive Officer and Managing Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                    | By:                                                               | /s/ Daniel S. Goldberg |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                    | Daniel S. Goldberg  Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director |
|                    | (Principal Executive  Officer)                                    |
|                    |                                                              |
| Date: November 14, 2005 |                                                              |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.17b



SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL AGREEMENTS TO OWNER PARTICIPANT
GUARANTEE CONSTITUTING EXHIBIT 10.17a HERETO

1. Owner Participant Guarantee dated as of August 24, 2000 by PSEG Resources
Inc. (Keystone Facility)

2. Owner Participant Guarantee dated as of August 24, 2000 by PSEG Resources
Inc. (Shawville Facility)
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pike Electric Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ J. Eric PikeDate: May 12, 2006
    
    J. Eric PikeChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit
31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 of Ready Mix, Inc. (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    /s/ Bradley E. LarsonBradley E. LarsonChief Executive Officer 23
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Terry Alan PANSIERA, Respondent.

No. 95-SC-163-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

April 20, 1995.

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

The respondent, Terry Alan Pansiera, was admitted as a member of the Kentucky Bar Association on motion and order of this Court entered October 23, 1992. On or about August 9, 1994, respondent was indicted in the Hamilton County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas for seven felony counts of corruption of a minor. Pansiera pled guilty on January 10, 1995, to each of the seven counts. On February 8, 1995, Pansiera was adjudged guilty of each count and sentenced to a two-year prison term on each count, to run consecutively. However, all the sentences were suspended except the first two-year sentence. Respondent was also sentenced to five years’ probation after he completes his prison sentence and was ordered to pay a $5,000 fine.

Pursuant to SCR 3.166, respondent was automatically suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, beginning on the day following the plea of guilty or finding of guilt by a judge or jury, whichever occurred first. Therefore, as of January 11, 1995, respondent Terry Alan Pansiera was suspended from the practice of law in Kentucky, which suspension shall remain in effect until dissolved or superseded by an order from this Court. No motion has been filed to modify or dissolve the suspension pursuant to SCR 3.166(1). As required by said rule, respondent shall immediately *614notify all his clients in -writing of his inability to continue to represent them and shall furnish copies of all such letters to the Director. He must also make arrangements to return all active files to his clients or new counsel, to return all unearned attorney fees and client property to his clients, and he shall advise the Director of such arrangements. Disciplinary proceedings against such attorney shall be initiated by the Inquiry Tribunal pursuant to SCR 3.160, unless already begun or unless the respondent resigns under terms of disbarment.

ENTERED: April 20, 1995.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens

Chief Justice
1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

William G. Walker, Esq. 

WILLIAM G. WALKER, P.C. 

177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 807 

Tucson, AZ 85701 

wgwpc@aol.com 

assistant@wgwatty.com 

Telephone: (520) 622-3330 

SBN: 005361 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States Of America, ) 

 ) No. 17-00340MJ 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

 ) 

Zoe E. Anderson, et.al., ) 

 ) Hon. Leslie Bowman 

 Defendants. ) 

 ______________________________________) 

 

 Undersigned counsel hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Defendant Zoe E. 

Anderson for all further proceedings in this matter. 

 DATED this 17th day of January, 2018. 

 WILLIAM G. WALKER, P.C. 

 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 807 

 Tucson, AZ 85701 

By /s/ William G. Walker________ 

 William G. Walker 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 

Case 4:17-mj-00340-N/A-BPV Document 14 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that on January 17, 2018, she caused to be electronically filed 

the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent 

notification to the following: 

Anna Wright, AUSA 

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, AZ 85701 

Anna.Wright@usdoj.gov

Nathaniel Walters AUSA 

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, AZ 85701 

Nathaniel.Walters@usdoj.gov

/s/ Lauren McKeen 

Legal Assistant 

 

Case 4:17-mj-00340-N/A-BPV Document 14 Filed 01/17/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1374]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,643]


Inland Steel Company, East Chicago, IN; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 1, 1995, applicable 
to all workers at Inland Steel Company, located in East Chicago, 
Indiana. The notice will soon be published in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Findings show that only 
the workers involved in the production of carbon and high strength low 
alloy steel plates were the subject of the investigation. Accordingly, 
the Department is limiting its certification to only those workers at 
Inland Steel, East Chicago, Indiana engaged in the production of carbon 
and high strength low alloy steel plates.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include any and 
all workers affected by increased imports, and separated as a result of 
the decline in sales or production of carbon and high strength low 
alloy steel plates produced at Inland Steel Company.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31, 643, is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Inland Steel Company, East Chicago, Indiana, 
engaged in employment related to the production of carbon and high 
strength low alloy steel plate who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after November 7, 1994 are eligible 
to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade 
Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of December 1995.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-1374 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the
previously filed Registration Statement on Forms S-8 File Nos. 333-69420 and 333-69416 and Form S-3 File No. 33-71692 of Dimeco, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2005, Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Dimeco, Inc.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|                        
|Wexford, Pennsylvania   
|March 21, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

s hould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11162

3:97-CR-408-12-P

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ALBERTO MANUEL GARCIA-GONZALEZ, also known as Tito,

also known as Alberto Lnu; OLGA BENITEZ

also known as Olga Osorio,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

December 13, 1999

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Garcia-Gonzalez and Benitez challenge various aspects of

their convictions for marijuana trafficking. Having reviewed the

briefs and carefully considered the arguments of counsel and

pertinent portions of the record, we affirm in all respects.

Both appellants argue that the district court abused its

discretion in admitting the testimony of Agent Marshall as to the

meaning of drug “code” words. We find no abuse of discretion.2

United States v. Griffith

, 118 F.3d 318 (5 th Cir. 1997). Given the

agent’s professional background and experience, and the helpfulness

to the jury of his identification of drug traffickers’ code

language, the court did not err in admitting his testimony.

There is sufficient evidence to support Garcia’s

conviction for use of a telephone to facilitate a drug trafficking

offense. The appellant’s conversation with Benitez, when taken in

context with other evidence in the record, showed that he was

supplying her money to acquire marijuana and that, within a couple

of days, he did acquire marijuana for resale through her efforts.

The court did no t abuse its discretion in denying

Benitez’s instruction concerning duress as a defense. Benitez did

not establish a fact issue concerning two of the requirements for

that duress, in that she demonstrated neither a “present, imminent,

and impending threat of such nature as to induce a well-grounded

apprehension of death or serious bodily injury,” nor that she had

no “reasonable legal alterna tive” to violating the law. U nited

States v. Posada-Rios , 158 F.3d 832, at 873 (5 th Cir. 1998).

Finally, there is no merit to Benitez’s challenge to her

offense level for sentencing purposes. The district court did not

clearly err in calculating the amount of marijuana attributable to

her, and it properly enhanced her offense level for possession of

a firearm, for obstruction of justice based on perjured trial

testimony, and for her managerial role in the drug conspiracy.

AFFIRMED

.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 26473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13254]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AGL-1]


Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Rochester, MN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) 
which amended the Class E airspace at Rochester, MN. The airspace, as 
published, was incomplete and will be reissued subsequently with the 
corrected airspace description.

DATES: May 28, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John A. Clayborn, Air Traffic Division, Operations Branch, AGL-530, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, 
Illinois 60018, telephone (847) 294-7459.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Proposed Rule

    On March 22, 1996, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published in 
the Federal Register to amend the Class E airspace at Rochester, MN. 
This was necessary to accommodate the new Copter GPS 325 degrees 
approach procedure to St. Mary's Hospital Heliport, Rochester, MN (61 
FR 11792). The airspace description, as published, was incomplete; 
therefore this NPRM is being withdrawn and will be reissued.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Withdrawal of Proposed Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Airspace 
Docket No. 96-AGL-1, as published in the Federal Register on March 22, 
1996 (61 FR 11792), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 14 CFR 11.69.

    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on May 1, 1996.
Maureen Woods,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division.
[FR Doc. 96-13254 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cellular, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Leah Wosk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of November, 2005.

/s/ Leah Wosk
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer