alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

James Clark - July 30, 2019

36

A. Specific training as in how?

Q. I have no idea. Is there something that --
something special that you all deal with when you're --
you're dealing with homeless people?

A. There's been no formal training, but they come
up with programs. Every now and then they will get a
grant to where they'll have different, not shelters but
resources that you can take them to, to get them help.

OF Okay. When the hobble is placed on, does it
-- is that like being hogtied?

A. What's your version of hogtied?

On Well, when, you know, handcuffs and maybe the
legs bend back, you can tighten it as much as you want
or not, but basically is that what it is, is that the
idea?

A. The idea is so he can't kick his feet. It's
to immobilize his feet, get them tied to the back. If
you cinch it up really tight, then I think what you're
referring to is hogtied.

(5 Yeah.

A. Where the legs are going to be past that
90-degree angle, and the heels will up on his lower
back.

Q. Depending on how tight you cinch it?

A. We don't do that.

Valley Court Reporting, LLC
www.valleycr.com

CONFIDENTIAL



EXHIBIT 15


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mussalina Muhaymin,
Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action No.

CV-17-04565-PHX-SMB
City of Phoenix, et al.,

Defendants.

VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JAMES CLARK

Scottsdale, Arizona
July 30, 2019
2:02 p.m.

PREPARED FOR:
(COPY)

PREPARED BY:
SHERYL L. HENKE, RPR
Arizona CCR No. 50745

Valley Court Reporting, LLC
www.valleycr.com

CONFIDENTIAL



10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

James Clark - July 30, 2019

21

was he -- was he uncuffed, or was he still cuffed and
you all were working on getting his arms behind his
back; do you recall?

A. Let me explain. He had a cuff on this arm, a

cuff on his right arm. They were using two sets of

cuffs.
Q. Yes.
A. They were not hooked together. So his right

arm, his left arm were not attached together with the
cuffs.

(0); Okay.

A. They were separate.

Q. All right. Fine. So when you got there they
were separated, but the cuffs were on the two arms?

A. Correct.

()c Okay. And that's when you all helped to

get -- collectively helped to get his arms behind his

back?
A. Correct.
Q. Now, when you got his arms behind his back,

did you all end up using one cuff or still both cuffs?

A. One cuff.
(o), And the -- the hinge cuff?
A. Yes.

Q. Okay. Was there any conversation with any

Valley Court Reporting, LLC
www.valleycr.com

CONFIDENTIAL
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13580]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, of 
Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 15, 1996, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of permit 
applications received. Permits were issued on May 23, 1996 to the 
following applicants:

Ron Koger, Permit #97-001.
David F. Parmelee, Permit #97-003.
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Office.
[FR Doc. 96-13580 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### The STATE of Texas, Petitioner, v. Clarence SPURS, $17,590 and One Ledger, Respondents.

No. D-2638.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 7, 1992.

Amy R. Blalock, Tyler, Dan Morales, Austin, Jack Skeen, Jr., Tyler, for petitioner.

Bill D. Rosenstein, Tyler, for respondents.

*646PER CURIAM.

After a trial, the district court rendered judgment forfeiting certain property to the State. The court of appeals reversed and rendered judgment against the State for failure of the district court to set a hearing in the action within 80 days of defendant’s answer, as formerly required by Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15, § 5.07(a), Act of May 28, 1973, 63rd Leg., R.S., ch. 429, 1973 Tex.Gen.Laws 1132, 1161, as amended, Act of May 25, 1985, 69th Leg., R.S., ch. 227, § 13, 1985 Tex.Gen.Laws 1102, 1124. 831 S.W.2d 40. For the reasons given in our opinion today in *State v. $435,000,*842 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.1992) (per curiam), a majority of the Court grants the State's application for writ of error in this case without hearing oral argument, reverses the judgment of the court of appeals, and remands the case to that court for consideration of respondent’s other points of error previously raised there and not addressed. Tex. R.App.P. 170.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December
      31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Laserlock
      Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Normal
      A. Gardner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


April
              2,
              2007
            
            /s/
              Norman GardnerNorman
                A. Gardner
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              Chief
                Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not , except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Explanatory
      Note: The same individual serves as chief executive (principal) officer and
      principal financial officer. Accordingly, there are no other individuals who
      are
“other certifying officers” referred to in this certification.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

m

1

THE NATHANSON LAW FIRM

8326 E Hartford Dr. Suite 101

Scottsdale, AZ 85255

480 - 419-2578

Philip J. Nathanson (Arizona State Bar #013624)

THE NATHANSON LAW FIRM

8326 E. Hartford Dr., Suite 101

Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Phone Number: (480) 419-2578

philipj@nathansonlawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ALYSSA JONES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RIOT HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC n/k/a 

NOATOZ LLC et al.

Defendants

Case No.: 2:17 – CV – 04612 – PHX – GMS

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

DEFENDANTS JW BAR, LLC AND

MRM HOSPITALITY, LLC

Judge G. Murray Snow, Presiding.

 

Plaintiff ALYSSA JONES, and Defendants, JW BAR, LLC and MRM HOSPITALITY, 

LLC., jointly move and stipulate to dismiss said Defendants only with prejudice, each 

stipulating party to bear their own attorney fees and costs. The case will remain pending 

against the other named defendants.

 

DATED this 5

th day of November, 2020.

ALYSSA JONES JW BAR, LLC AND MRM

HOSPITALITY, LLC

By: /s/ Philip Nathanson /s/ Tracy A. Miller 

Plaintiff’s Attorney Attorney for Stipulating Defendants

Tracy A. Miller, SBN 015920

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK 

& STEWART, P.C.,

Esplanade Center III, Suite 800

2415 East Camelback Road

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 382 Filed 11/05/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

m

2

THE NATHANSON LAW FIRM

8326 E Hartford Dr. Suite 101

Scottsdale, AZ 85255

480 - 419-2578

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 5

th day of November, 2020, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s office using CM/ECF System for filing, and transmitted 

a Notice of Service of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Christopher Thomas Curran, Esq. (ccurran@clarkhill.com)

Darrel Eugene Davis, Esq. (ddavis@clarkhill.com)

David I Weissman, Esq. (dweissman@clarkhill.com)

Sean Michael Carroll, Esq. (scarroll@clarkhill.com)

Tracy Miller, Esq. (tracy.miller@ogletree.com) 

By: /s/ Philip Nathanson

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 382 Filed 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 106 (Friday, May 31, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13652]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than June 13, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Randy W. and Karla L. Britt, both of Clifton Hill, Missouri; to 
acquire an additional .65 percent, for a total of 19.64 percent, and D. 
Wayne and Mary E. Britt, both of Callao, Missouri, to acquire an 
additional .19 percent, for a total of 5.98 percent, of the voting 
shares of RMB Bancshares, Inc., Marceline, Missouri, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Regional Missouri Bank, Marceline, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 24, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-13652 Filed 5-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Case 4:18-mj-00031-N/A-DTF Document 1 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 20, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. White, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ JAMES D. WHITEJames D. WhiteChairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President


Date: May 26, 2010

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
``

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
 of Star Energy Corporation (Registrant) for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Dr. Nafi Onat, chief executive
 officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
 Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents,
 in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by
 this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Dr. Nafi Onat

Dr. Nafi Onat

Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant
 to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
 Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
 Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
 before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
 in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required
 by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to
 the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Missouri ex rel., Gregory BATES, Relator, v. The Honorable Peter REA, Judge, Circuit Court of Taney County, Respondent.

No. 20684.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

May 16, 1996.

David N. Shuler, Springfield, for relator.

Riehard W. Mason, Richard W. Mason, P.C., Kansas City, for respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION

PREWITT, Judge.

Following Relator’s petition in prohibition, this Court entered a preliminary order in prohibition. Relator contended that Respondent Judge improperly refused to disqualify following Relator’s filing of two motions to do so.

Respondent counters that the initial motion was filed after evidence was heard, and thus Relator waived the filing of the motion to disqualify. Respondent also asserts that Relator waived the right to disqualify Respondent by agreeing that the matter be assigned to him, and by proceeding after the judge disclosed that he was a party to a lawsuit in opposition to Relator’s mother. The lawsuit is the reason Relator contends that Respondent should have granted a change of judge.

Without deciding who is correct, as the record does not conclusively establish that Respondent Judge should have disqualified, the preliminary order is dissolved and the petition denied. The issue presented may be better reviewed on appeal when the record is more definitely developed. There, with a proper transcript, what occurred at the hearings on this matter, including what the judge disclosed and Relator’s actions thereafter, *431should establish whether Relator waived his right to a change of judge.

“Appellate courts are reluctant to issue the extraordinary writs of prohibition and mandamus except where a clear right to them appears.” *State ex rel. Lahammer v. Franklin,*756 S.W.2d 956 (Mo.App.1988). Issuing an order in prohibition is discretionary in an appellate court. *Id.*at 957.

A judge is entitled to the presumption that he will not hear a matter if he cannot be impartial. *State v. Ayers,*911 S.W.2d 648, 651 (Mo.App.1995). Appellate courts defer to the trial judge’s decision on such a question, unless there is an abuse of discretion. *Id. See also Grissom v. Grissom,*886 S.W.2d 47, 55-56 (Mo.App.1994). “A judge has an affirmative duty not to disqualify himself unnecessarily.” *Helton Constr. Co., Inc. v. Thrift,*865 S.W.2d 419, 422 (Mo.App.1993).

A party may waive the right to disqualify a judge if it is clear from the record that a trial or hearing has commenced, or the cause taken under submission. *Heller v. AIM, Inc.,*851 S.W.2d 82, 85 (Mo.App.1993). *See also State ex rel. Nassau v. Kohn,*731 S.W.2d 840, 842 (Mo. banc 1987); *State ex rel. York v. Kays,*916 S.W.2d 859, 860 (Mo.App.1996); *Helton Constr. Co., Inc. v. Thrift, supra,*865 S.W.2d at 422.

As the record does not establish a clear right to the relief sought, the preliminary order is dissolved and Relator’s petition denied.

SHRUM, C.J., and PARRISH, J., concur.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certificate pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of FirstBank Financial Services, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thaddeus M. Williams, ActingChief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Lisa J. Maxwell, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       To myknowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|              | /s/ Thaddeus M. Williams                           |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|              | Thaddeus M. Williams,  Acting President and C.E.O. |
|              | (Principal Executive  Officer)                     |
|              |                                               |
|              | /s/ Lisa J. Maxwell                                |
|              | Lisa J. Maxwell, C.F.O.                            |
|              | (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer)      |
|              |                                               |
| November 09, 2005 |                                               |

 

21

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13918]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Bureau of Engraving and Printing


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing within 
the Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the 
Claim for Amounts Due in the Case of a Deceased Owner of Mutilated 
Currency.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 30, 1996 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Department of Treasury, 
Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Pamela V. Grayson, 14th & C Streets, 
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20228, (202) 874-2212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form(s) and instructions should be directed to Department 
of Treasury, Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Lorraine Robinson, 14th 
& C Streets, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20228, (202) 874-2532.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Claim for Amounts in the Case of a Deceased Owner of 
Mutilated Currency.
    OMB Number: 1520-002.
    Form Number: BEP 5287.
    Abstract: To show ownership of claims submitted for deceased 
individuals.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement (without change).
    Affected Public: Individuals or households/Business.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 180.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 165.

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Comments submitted in response to this notice 
will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All 
comments will become a matter of public record. Written comments should 
address the accuracy of the burden estimates and ways to minimize 
burden including the use of automated collection techniques or the use 
of other forms of information technology, as well as other relevant 
aspects of the information collection request.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Pamela V. Grayson,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 96-13918 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4840-01-M