alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 565 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 19, 2009. 

Resolved, That Mr. Schiff, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Goodlatte, and Mr. Sensenbrenner are appointed managers on the part of the House 

to conduct the trial of the impeachment of Samuel B. Kent, 

a judge of the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Texas, that a message be sent to the Senate to 

inform the Senate of these appointments, and that the managers on the part of the House may exhibit the articles of 

impeachment to the Senate and take all other actions necessary in connection with preparation for, and conduct of, the 

trial, which may include the following: 

(1) Employing legal, clerical, and other necessary 

assistants and incurring such other expenses as may be 

necessary, to be paid from amounts available to the 

Committee on the Judiciary under House Resolution 

279, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, agreed to March 

31, 2009, or any other applicable expense resolution on 
2 

•HRES 565 EH 

vouchers approved by the Chairman of the Committee on 

the Judiciary. 

(2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing with 

the Secretary of the Senate, on the part of the House 

of Representatives, any subsequent pleadings which they 

consider necessary. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the quarterly report of Brownsville Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Xuxin
Shao, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Xuxin Shao
-----------------------
Xuxin Shao
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
October 3, 2005


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 3:17-cr-08298-DGC Document 1 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:17-cr-08298-DGC Document 1 Filed 11/28/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:17-cr-08298-DGC Document 1 Filed 11/28/17 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony JACKSON, Appellant. Anthony JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 59669, 61883.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 7, 1993.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay), Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his *Batson*challenge to the State’s peremptory strikes of four venirepersons after this court remanded to the trial court to determine whether said strikes were racially motivated, 865 S.W.2d 678. We find no clear error in such denial. *State v. Pullen,*843 S.W.2d 360, 362—63[3] (Mo. banc 1992).

We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Sridhar Ganesan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of WorldSpace, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2006



/s/    SRIDHAR GANESANSridhar GanesanExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

Advanced Analogic Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd.,incorporated in Hong Kong on June 23, 1999. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies Corporation, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands onSeptember 21, 1999. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies Holdings, Inc., incorporated in the British Virgin Islands on July 24, 2001.

Advanced Analogic Technologies Japan, Incorporated, incorporated in Japan on August 5, 2003. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, incorporated in Macau on March 14, 2005. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies (China) Inc., incorporated in the People’s Republic of China on January 23, 2006. 

Elite Micro Devices Inc., incorporated in the Cayman Islands on September 26, 2006.
EXHIBIT 10.76

AGREEMENT FOR PRICE ADJUSTMENT

This agreement is entered into as of September 1st, 2000 by and between Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. (Oki) and Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. (CSI).

Oki will bill CSI for five million US dollars ($5,000,000) as the price adjustment for the wafers delivered to CSI during the period from May 1st, 2000 through September 30th, 2000. CSI agrees to pay the five million US dollars
($5,000,000) to Oki on September 27th, 2000.

Definition:

Wafers:  [*].

	CATALYST SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.


	 	   	OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY, CO. LTD.



	/s/  Hideyuki Tanigami	 	   	/s/  Hisao Baba
	
	 	  	

	Name:  Hideyuki Tanigami
Title:    Chairman of the Board	 	   	Name:  Hisao Baba
Title:    Vice President & General Manager Marketing & Sales Dev., SiSC



	


	 	  	 



	22 September 2000	 	  	September 22, 2000
	
	 	  	

	Date	 	  	Date



[*]   Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
****
```
Exhibit 3.4
```

```
                             ARTICLES OF CORRECTION
                                       OF
                         HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC.

Pursuant to Section 607.0124 of the Florida Business Corporation Act of the
State of Florida, the undersigned corporation hereby submits these Articles of
Correction for the purpose of correcting a document filed with the Secretary of
State:

1.       The name of the corporation is High Speed Net Solutions, Inc.

2.       On the 3rd day of March, 2000, the corporation filed with the
         Secretary of State Articles of Amendment dated February 24, 2000,
         which Articles of Amendment designated a new series of preferred stock
         referred to therein as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

3.       The Statement of Rights and Preferences of the 8% Series A Convertible
         Preferred Stock attached to the foregoing Articles of Amendment were
         incorrect with respect to Paragraph 1, "Number and Designation," in
         that The Statement of Rights and Preferences contained a typographical
         error and incorrectly stated that the Series A Convertible Preferred
         Stock has "no par value," instead of "$.001 par value," which was the
         intent of the corporation.

         This the 22nd day of June, 2000.

                                             HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC.

                                             By: /s/ Andrew Fox
                                             --------------------------------
                                                 Andrew Fox, Acting President
```

****
1 

2 

3 

4 / 

I 5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STAT.ES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

\· 

United States of America, No. 18-04019MJ-001-PCT-DMF 

Plaintiff, ORDER 

.. v. 

Leander Maurice Witcher, 

Defendant. 

Defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3141 et. seq. a 

' 

detention hearing was held. The defendant is ordered detained pending an intake 

as'sessment for placement at Crossroads in Phoenix, Arizona or other facility as 

designated by Pretrial Services. Should defendant qualify for such placement, defendant 

shall be released upon conditions set by this Court, including pretrial residency at said 

facility, as conditions do exist which would reasonably assure the safety of others ~nd the 

appearance of the defendant. Should defendant not so qualify, the release conditions set 

by this Court shall be vacated and defendant shall be detained pending trial as there are 

no conditions or combination of conditions which would reasonably assure the safety of 

others or the appearance of the defendant. 

The Pretrial Services Officer is ordered to timely notify this Court of the 

defendant's intake assessment results, and if found acceptable, the date and time the 

II 
1 facility will provide transportation from the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse for the 

2 defendant. 

3 Dated this 25th day of January, 2018. 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 -
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 21, 2020 No. 04

- 19

- 00708

- CR Imelda BARRERA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 06

- 11255

- CRSI Honorable Federico Hinojosa, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On April 7, 2020, appellant filed a “ Motion to Abate Appeal and Remand for Out of Time Motion for New Trial ” in which appellant asserts she wishes to file an out

- of

- time motion for new trial based on the ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. The issue appellant seeks to develop can be properly raised in a post

- conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. See Pettway v. State , 4 S.W.3d 390, 391 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, order) (per curiam) (holding that defendant failed to show good cause to suspend appellate rules to allow him to file out

- of

- time motion for new trial when defendant cou ld raise ineffectiveness claim in post

- conviction habeas corpus proceeding); Fuentes v. State , No. 01

- 04

- 01018

- CR, 2006 WL 2640807, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Sept. 14, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (denying defendant’ s motion to abate because ineffectiveness issues defendant sought to develop could “properly be raised in a post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus [proceeding] ”); see also Griffith v. State , 507 S.W.3d 720, 723 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (Hervey, J., concurring ) (ineffective

- assistance claims may “be addressed on habeas”). This court has previously held that it will not abate an appeal for this purpose because ineffective assistance may be raised in a post

- conviction habeas corpus proceeding. see also Bowler v . State , 822 S.W.2d 334, 335 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1992 , pet. ref ’ d). Appellant’s “Motion to Abate Appeal and Remand for Out of Time Motion for New Trial” is DENIED

.On April 7, 2020, appellant also filed a motion for extension of time requesting an

a dditional seven (7) days from the date of an order denying her motion to abate. Appellant’s motion for an extension of time is GRANTED . Appellant’s brief is due on or before April 28, 2020.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of April, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.6

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. II

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Florida Holding Co. II (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Short, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 11, 2006



By:

/S/ MICHAEL J. SHORTMichael J. ShortPrincipal Financial Officer




36
ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE

THIS ASSIGNMENT made this 10th day of March 1998, by and between Gemma Global,
Inc. and ("Assignor"), and Global International, Inc. ("Assignee"):

WITNESSETH, that for valuable consideration in hand paid by the Assignee to the
Assignor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Assignor hereby assigns
and transfers to the Assignee all of his right, title and interest in and to the
two licenses from Jennicor, LLC as set forth in (i) the Licence Agreement dated
March 15, 1999, whereby Jennicor, LLC granted Gemma Global Inc., rights to the
Jennifer Gucci name; and the Licence Agreement dated March 15, 1999, whereby
Jennicor, LLC granted Gemma Global Inc., rights to the Gemma Gucci name.
Provided, however, no warranties of any kind whatsoever are made incident to
this Assignment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound, the Assignor and Assignee
have signed this Assignment on the dates set forth below, with the effect as of
the date first above written.


By: /s/ Edward E. Litwak
    -----------------------------
    Edward E. Litwak, President

Date:  9/18/00




/s/ Robert Stulman
----------------------------------------
Robert Stulman, VP-Production, Secretary


Date:  9/18/00
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00332-CV

KATRINA AHRENS,

Appellant

v.

DALLAS POLICE ASSOCIATION, DPA'S 

ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION, INC., 

FREDERICK FRAZIER, CITY OF DALLAS, 

AND ZAC PRODUCTS II, LLC,

Appellees

From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-C201700365

and

No. 10-18-00207-CV

IN RE DPA'S ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION, INC.

Original Proceeding

ORDER

The trial court judge in these proceedings recused himself on June 1, 2018. The 
Ahrens v. Dallas Police Association Page 2

In re DPA’s Assist the Officer Foundation, Inc.

Court has not been informed whether a new trial court judge has been appointed to hear 

the underlying case. Accordingly, the Court requests a status report from the parties, 

which shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court no later than 7 days from the date of this 

order, informing the Court whether a new trial court judge has been appointed to hear 

the underlying case and if so, the name of that judge. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Report requested

Order issued and filed August 1, 2018
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 4.6b

Participation Agreement (NC 3) dated July 13, 2000 among the Registrant, Montana
OL1 LLC, Wilmington Trust Company, Montana OP1 LLC, and The Chase Manhattan
Bank, as Lease Indenture Trustee and as Pass Through Trustee.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 51147,Inc., for the Quarter Ending October 31, 2005, I, Michael A. Zahorik, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of 51147, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

          2.     The          information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the          period ended October 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 51147,          Inc. 

 
| Dated: December 9, 2005 |
|-------------------------|

 

**51147, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Michael A. Zahorik*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (i) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the fiscal year                ended                December 31, 2006, and to which this certification is attached as                Exhibit                32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (ii) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Jay Sargeant        |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Jay                Sargeant            |
|   |                                   |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer |
|   |                                   |
| Date:  | March                30, 2007          |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its      staff upon request.*

*This      certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not deemed      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933      or      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date      of      the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained      in such filing.*

----
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Neil A. BANKS, Respondent.

No. 89-SC-82-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 4, 1989.

OPINION AND ORDER

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

In a disciplinary proceeding, the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association concluded that Banks was guilty of unethical and unprofessional conduct calculated to bring the legal profession of Kentucky into disrepute. The Board recommended that Banks be publicly reprimanded for misconduct in allowing his client, a collection agency, to obtain a judgment against a person for a debt which was not owed.

Having reviewed the Board’s decision, and pursuant to SCR 3.370, the court adopts the findings and recommendations of the Board of Governors. Banks is hereby publicly reprimanded and is directed hereby to pay the costs of this proceeding.

All concur.
Exhibit 99.1 A-1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, David Devine,  President and Chief Executive Officer of Devine  Entertainment
Corporation  (the  "Registrant"),  certifies  that to the best of my  knowledge,
based upon a review of the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2005 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ David Devine
----------------
Name: David Devine
Date: December 19, 2005
IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

_____________________ _____

09-16-00176-CV

__________________________

_________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the

418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-04-03546-CV

_________________________________________________________________ 

JUDGMENT

THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. IT 

IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s opinion, that 

the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of the appeal are 

assessed against the appellant. 

Opinion of the Court delivered by Justice Charles Kreger 

December 14, 2017

AFFIRMED

**********

Copies of this judgment and the Court’s opinion are certified for 

observance.

Carol Anne Harley

Clerk of the Court

In the Interest of A.G.B. and L.A.B.