alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Marc Shipley, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

City of Tucson, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-17-00558-TUC-DCB

ORDER 

 Pursuant to this Court’s Order to Show Cause, (Order (Doc. 9), and Plaintiff’s 

failure to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. 

 Dated this 2nd day of January, 2019.
DISTRICT JUDGE'S CIVIL MINUTES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Susan M. Brnovich

Case Number: CV-17-04565-PHX-SMB 

Date: April 13, 2021

Muhaymin v. Phoenix, City of et al

APPEARANCES: Plaintiff(s) Counsel Defendant(s) Counsel

Brian J. Theut

Haytham Faraj

David A. Chami

Karen J. Stillwell

MOTION HEARING:

Motion Hearing re: Defendant’s Motion to Continue Oral Argument (Doc. 304) held. Oral argument 

held. It is hereby ordered denying the motion.

Discussion held regarding Plaintiffs’ Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony (Lodged at Docs. *306, 

307, and 308) and Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony (Lodged at Doc. 303). 

Defendant moves to strike Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony by Defendants’ Expert Dr. 

Binh Ly (Doc. 306). The motion is granted with leave to refile as 17 pages within seven days from 

today’s date. Defendant shall respond within two weeks from the date it’s filed. 

Defendants’ oral motion for a two-week extension to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion Exclude (Docs 307 

and 308) is granted with no objection by the Plaintiff. 

Plaintiffs’ oral motion for a two-week extension to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert 

Testimony by Plaintiff’s Expert Dr. Bennet Omalu is granted with no objection by the Defendant. 

Deputy Clerk: Elaine Garcia

Court Reporter: Christine Coaly

18 minutes

Start: 11:01 AM

Stop: 11:19 AM

*The documents are now filed as Docs. 313, 314, 315 and 316
CERTIFICATION





I, Van
der Bok Busboom, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of U.S. Canadian Minerals,
Inc. (formerly known as Barrington Foods International, Inc.);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





August
20, 2008








/s/ 
Van der Bok
Busboom


Van
der Bok Busboom


Chief
Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12689]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 101

[Docket Nos. 91N-384H and 95P-0241]
RIN 0910-AA19


Food Labeling: Nutrient Content Claims, Definition of Term: 
Healthy

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a proposed 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of February 12, 1996 (61 FR 
5349). The document proposed to amend the food labeling regulations to 
permit certain processed fruits and vegetables and enriched cereal-
grain products that conform to a standard of identity to bear the term 
``healthy.'' The document was published with an inadvertent error. This 
document corrects that error.

DATES: Written comments by July 18, 1996. FDA proposes that any final 
rule that may issue based on this proposal become effective on the date 
of publication in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch 
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, 
Rockville, MD 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Felicia B. Satchell, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-158), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-5099.
    In FR Doc. 96-2980, appearing on page 5349 in the Federal Register 
of Monday, February 12, 1996, the discussion that appears on page 5354 
in the first column under the heading ``V. Environmental Impact'' is 
corrected by removing the paragraph that appears there in its entirety 
and adding in its place ``The agency has determined under 21 CFR 
25.24(a)(11) that this action is of a type that does not individually 
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. 
Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental 
impact statement is required.''

    Dated: May 15, 1996.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 96-12689 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### Gerald Milton SHAFFER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 627-88.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Nov. 29, 1989.

Allen D. Rountree, Tyler, for appellant.

Jack Skeen, Jr., Dist. Atty., Christina E. Bryan, Michael J. Sandlin, Asst. Dist. At-tys., Tyler, and Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON COURT’S OWN MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of robbery and his punishment was assessed at thirty years in the Texas Department of Corrections. The Twelfth Court of Appeals reversed the appellant’s conviction. *Shaffer v. State,*769 S.W.2d 945 (Tex.App.—Tyler, 1988).

The State timely filed its petition for discretionary review. In a single ground for review the State urged this Court to apply a harmless error analysis to violations of Article 1.13, V.A.C.C.P. Originally, the State’s petition was refused; however, the State’s motion for rehearing was granted. On May 3, 1989, the court of *802appeals’ decision was reversed and the trial court’s judgment was affirmed. *Shaffer v. State,*769 S.W.2d 943 (Tex.Cr.App.1989).

After reviewing the court of appeals’ opinion it is apparent that the reversal of the court of appeals’ judgment and affirming the appellant’s conviction was incorrect. In its opinion, the court of appeals also concluded that the appellant’s punishment had been improperly enhanced because the conviction used to enhance the punishment was based on a void indictment. The appellant’s conviction was therefore reversed and the case remanded to the trial court. *Shaffer v. State,*769 S.W.2d 945 (Tex.App.—Tyler, 1988). The State, however, did not request review of this portion of the court of appeals’ decision. Thus, on May 19, 1989, our mandate was withdrawn by order of the Court.*

The following is now the judgment of the Court on its own motion for rehearing: the decision of this Court in its original opinion is adopted relative to reversing the court of appeals’ judgment on the State’s ground for review; however, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed and the cause remanded to the trial court.

*

The Court has the authority to withdraw its mandate at any time during the term of court it was issued. See *French v. State,*572 S.W.2d 934 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); *Dermee v. State,*379 S.W.2d 908 (Tex.Cr.App.1964).
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  STATEMENT
        REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Salon City, Inc. for
        the
        nine months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Casciola, our President,
        Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 *   the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial
        condition and results of operations.
 
 /s/ Steven Casciola
 Steven
        Casciola
 President,
        Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 November
        14, 2007
 
  This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section
        18 of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeremy Thacker, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GPS Insight LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV18-0063 PHX DGC

ORDER

The Court has entered an order advising counsel that due to this Court’s trial 

schedule, this case will be reassigned to the Honorable Stephen M. McNamee for 

purposes of further pretrial and trial proceedings. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Clerk of Court shall directly reassigned this case to the Honorable 

Stephen M. McNamee.

2. The final pretrial conference set for December 19, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. is 

vacated and will be reset by Judge McNamee.

3. The trial dates (February 3-6, 2020) as set forth in Doc. 159 are confirmed.

Dated this 13th day of December, 2019.

Case 2:18-cv-00063-SMM Document 193 Filed 12/13/19 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:17-cr-01403-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01403-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01403-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01403-DJH Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 4 of 4
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 5, 2018

a0226 

# Order

Clerk March 5, 2018

154113

JOHN McBRIDE,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 154113

AGC: 3271

- 00

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and

relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested

relief.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J ASON O'SHEA YOUNG , A ppellant , v. Case No. 5D 22
- 2241 LT Case No. 2016
- CF
- 255
- A STATE O F F LORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed December 27, 2022 3.850 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Marion County , Robert W

. H odges, Judge

. J ason O 'Shea Young, M ayo, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CUR IAM. A FFIRMED.

EVANDER , WALLIS and EDWARDS , JJ., conc ur
.
Exhibit 10.7.2

Synova Healthcare Group, Inc.

1400 North Providence Road, Suite 6010

Media, Pennsylvania 19063

September 13, 2007

Castlerigg Master Investments Ltd.

40 West 57th St

26th Floor

New York, NY 10019



|Re: | Synova Healthcare Group, Inc. (the Company) Proposed Financing; Consent, Amendment and Waiver Letter.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to that certain
Consent, Amendment and Waiver letter, dated as of todays date by and between you and the Company (the Consent) and the Security Documents (as defined in the Consent).

The Company hereby covenants and agrees to reimburse you for your reasonable legal expenses, up to $7,500, incurred in connection with the preparation
and execution of the Consent and the Security Documents.

In addition, in connection with the Security Agreement (as defined in the
Consent), the Company agrees, upon demand, to pay you the amount of any and all reasonable expenses, including the reasonable fees and expenses of your counsel, which you may incur in connection with the future administration, waiver or other
modification or termination of the Security Agreement.

This letter agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of New
York, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision or rule that would cause the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York.



Very truly yours,SYNOVA HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.By:

/s/ Stephen E. KingName:

Stephen E. KingTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




---

|                                      |  |                               
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|ACKNOWLEDGED, AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:
|                                     
|CASTLERIGG MASTER INVESTMENTS LTD.   
|                                      | 
|By:                                   |  | SANDELL ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP.
|                                      | 
|                                      |  | /s/ Patrick T. Burke          
|Name:                                 |  | Patrick T. Burke              
|Title:                                |  | Senior Managing Director      
|                                      | 
|DATE:                                 |  | SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
August 22, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IRVIN HOLLIS FERREE, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00286-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. 

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13775]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Extension of Draft Clean Air Act; General Conformity 
Determination; Comment Period for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, 
Seattle, WA

Action: The Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, 
Northwest Mountain Region and the Port of Seattle, Seattle, Washington, 
announce an extension (to June 6, 1996) of the Public and agency 
comment period associated with the Draft General Conformity 
Determination prepared as specified in section 176(c) (42 USC 7506c) of 
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. The Draft General Conformity 
Determination, and supporting documentation is contained in the 
February 1996, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Master Plan 
Update, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This comment period extension applies only to comments pertaining 
exclusively to the Draft General Conformity Determination and no other 
issues. Comments on other issues will not be accepted or addressed.
    Comments may be directed to: Mr. Dennis Ossenkop, Northwest 
Mountain Region, Airports Division, Federal Aviation Administration, 
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments must be 
received by June 6, 1996.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 22, 1996.
Lowell H. Johnson,
Manager, Airports Division, Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest 
Mountain Region Renton, Washington.
[FR Doc. 96-13775 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
**EXHIBIT 23** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement on Form S-8    (File No. 333-138742)    pertaining to the Learning Ventures, Inc. 1993 Stock Option    Plan, the Capella Education Company 1999 Stock Option Plan, and    the Capella Education Company 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of our    report dated February 13, 2007, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements and schedule of Capella    Education Company included in this Annual Report on    Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Minneapolis, Minnesota
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12658]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 050496D]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. 0

ACTION: Issuance of photography permit no. 1002 (P604).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Mr. Andrew Byatt, Great Natural 
Journeys, Natural History Unit, BBC, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, England 
BS8 2LR, has been issued a permit to take by Level B harassment several 
species of non-threatened, non-endangered marine mammals for purposes 
of commercial photography.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Director, Southwest Region, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4001); and
    Director, Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE, BIN 
C15700, Bldg. 1, Seattle, WA 98115-0070 (206/526-6150).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 2, 1996, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (61 FR 14556) that the above-named applicant had 
submitted a request for a permit to take several species of marine 
mammals by Level B harassment during the course of commercial 
photographic activities. The requested permit has been issued, under 
the authority of Sec. 104(c)(6) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 
1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.).

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-12658 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sun Cal Energy, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lewis Dillman, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), and I,
George Drazenovic, the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 17, 2007

|By: | /s/ Lewis Dillman                                 | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Lewis Dillman, Chief Executive
      Officer,     | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)                     | 
|    |                                                   | 
|    |                                                   | 
|    |                                                   | 
|By: | /s/ George Drazenovic                             | 
|    | George Drazenovic, Chief
      Financial Officer, | 
|    | Treasurer and Secretary                           | 
|    | (Principal Financial Officer and                  | 
|    | Principal Accounting Officer)                     | 

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00360

- CR

Deandre Jerome DORCH

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 201 6CR9222B

The Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Substitute Counsel is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHER EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court