alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Ocean WestHolding Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies with respect to the Annual Report on Form10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “10-K Report”) that to his knowledge:
     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: January 13, 2005     /s/ Marshall L. Stewart  Marshall L. Stewart President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: January 13, 2005     /s/ Wayne K. Bailey  Wayne K. Bailey Chief Financial Officer
73
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period from ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Kenneth BosketKenneth
      Bosket
                    CEO
                    Dated:
      March 10, 2009
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period from ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Montse ZamanMontse
      Zaman
                    CFO
                    Dated:
      March 10, 2009
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### LOWERY BROS. LUMBER CO., Elvin Lowery and Lester Lowery, Appellants v. John KNUPP, Appellee.

No. 09-94-192 CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Dec. 15, 1994.

Robert G. Osborn, Lufkin, for appellant.

Blair A. Bisbey, Seale, Stover, Coffield & Bisbey, Jasper, for appellee.

Before WALKER, C.J., and BROOKSHIRE and BURGESS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We have before the Court an agreed motion to reverse the trial court’s judgment and to render a take nothing judgment pursuant to a settlement agreement by and between the parties and their respective attorneys.

This Court having considered the joint motion of the parties to reverse and remand for a take-nothing judgment filed herein on November 17, 1994, is of the opinion that the joint motion should be, and is hereby granted. It is therefore,

ORDERED that pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 59(a)(1)(A) that:

(1) the judgment of the trial court is vacated;

. (2) the cause is remanded to the district court of Jasper County, Texas, for further proceedings regarding the rendition of judgment in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties; and

*705(3) the cost of court shall be paid as per the settlement agreement of the parties.

This order to replace our order of December 7, 1994.

TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT VACATED.

REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF AGREED JUDGMENT.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Stephen E. King, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Intentionally omitted].

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                                      |  |                       |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Stephen E. King                                   |  |                       |  | 
|Stephen E. King, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | Date: August 14, 2007
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Adam S. Berger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Spark Networks, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/ Adam S. Berger                                    
|Adam S. Berger Chief Executive Officer August 10, 2007
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Joyce Steel Erection, Ltd., Appellant

No. 06-14-00064-CV v.

Gordon Ray Bonner, Appellee

Appeal from the 202nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 11C0822-

202). Opinion delivered by Justice Carter,* 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley, 

participating. *Justice Carter, Sitting by 

Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify paragraph 1(a) of the trial court’s judgment to reflect an 

award of actual damages to Gordon Ray Bonner in the amount of $1,937,467.32. As modified, 

the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We further order that the appellant, Joyce Steel Erection, Ltd., shall pay eighty-three 

percent of the costs of this appeal and that the appellee, Gordon Ray Bonner, shall pay seventeen 

percent of the costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 17, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit
      99.34**






**IRREVOCABLE
      PROXY COUPLED WITH INTEREST**




The
      undersigned stockholder hereby irrevocably designates and appoints The Longview
      Fund, L.P., a California
      limited partnership (“ Longview ”) ,
      to
      represent it at all annual and special meetings of the stockholders of SONTERRA
      OPERATING, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “ Corporation ”),
      and
      the undersigned hereby authorizes and empowers Longview, as agent (“ Agent ”),
      to
      vote any and all stock owned by the undersigned or standing in its name, and
      do
      all things which the undersigned might do if present and acting itself, each,
      as
      subject to the last paragraph hereof.




This
      proxy is an irrevocable proxy coupled with an interest. The undersigned
      recognizes that Longview, as Agent, has a security interest in said stock to
      secure certain obligations incurred by the undersigned, and to the extent
      permitted by law, this proxy shall continue in full force and effect,
      notwithstanding any time limitations set forth in the by-laws or organizational
      documents of the Corporation or the general corporation law of the State of
      Delaware.




This
      proxy is issued pursuant to that certain Pledge Agreement dated as of even
      date
      herewith by and between Sonterra Resources, Inc. (f/k/a River Capital Group,
      Inc.) and Viking Asset Management, LLC, a California limited liability company,
      and shall remain subject to the terms thereof and Agent shall not exercise
      any
      right or privileges granted therein except as provided for in the Pledge
      Agreement.




Dated:
      February 14, 2008




**SONTERRA
                OIL & GAS, INC.,** a Delaware corporationBy:
            /s/
                Wayne A. PsencikName:
            Wayne
                A. PsencikTitle:
            President
H. Res. 307 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 1, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

1256) to protect the public health by providing the Food and 

Drug Administration with certain authority to regulate tobacco products. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 

of rule XXI. The amendment printed in part A of the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall 

be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 

bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled 

by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce; (2) the amendment in the nature 

of a substitute printed in part B of the report on the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative Buyer of Indi-
2 

•HRES 307 EH 

ana, or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order except those arising under clause 

9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as read, and shall 

be separately debatable for thirty minutes equally divided and 

controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 

motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. (a) In the engrossment of H.R. 1256, the Clerk 

shall— 

(1) add the text of H.R. 1804, as passed by the 

House, as new matter at the end of H.R. 1256; 

(2) conform the title of H.R. 1256 to reflect the addition to the engrossment of H.R. 1804; 

(3) assign appropriate designations to provisions 

within the engrossment; and 

(4) conform provisions for short titles within the engrossment. 

(b) Upon the addition of the text of H.R. 1804 to the 

engrossment of H.R. 1256, H.R. 1804 shall be laid on the 

table. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Financial Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Mangiapane, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

April 2, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13356]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Michigan Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Michigan Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 18, 1996, at the Westin 
Hotel, Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243. The purpose of the 
meeting is to hold a Michigan Consultation: Focus on Affirmative 
Action.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Janice Frazier, 
313-259-8180, or Constance Davis, Director of the Midwestern Regional 
Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 20, 1996.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-13356 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Order filed April 11, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-01046-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.K., C.A.A.K., J.J.K., AND J.A.K., children

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Washington County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CCL-6454

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of 

the parent-child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). On March 26, 

2012, this court granted appellant’s request for a supplement reporter’s record The 

supplemental reporter’s record was due April 9, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 

28.4(a)(1). The record has not been filed.

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought 

to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. See Tex. R. 

Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). The trial and appellate courts are jointly 
2

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence the 

preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, if 

necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). 

Because the supplemental reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this 

accelerated appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Marsha Burns, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

on or before April 20, 2012. If Marsha Burns does not timely file the record as ordered, 

the court will issue an order requiring her to appear at a hearing to show cause why the 

record has not been timely filed and why she should not be held in contempt of court for 

failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of court is punishable by a fine and/or 

confinement in jail.

Appellant’s brief is due 7 days after the supplemental reporter’s record is filed.

PER CURIAM
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Ron Lizée, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Acrongenomics, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Melt
Inc.

Dated  October 7, 2008 .

|/s/ Ron Lizée                                                  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Ron Lizée                                                      | 
|Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director                | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | 
|                                                               | 

---
#### Charlesetta OATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51875.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 26, 1996.

Rosemary E. Percival, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*350
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-convietion relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 20, 2010,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen L. Luey, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 26, 2010 

*A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required bySection 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*