alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Aanda Slocum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Corizon Health Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-18-00044-TUC-JGZ

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines (Doc. 57), and 

good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the following deadlines are extended: 

1. Discovery shall close on June 5, 2019. 

2. The deadline to confer regarding Summary Judgment is June 17, 2019. 

3. Dispositive Motions shall be due on July 8, 2019. 

4. The Proposed Joint Pre-trial Order is due July 8, 2019, if no dispositive motions 

are filed. If dispositive motions are filed, then the Proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order 

is due 30 days after their resolution. 

All other deadlines shall remain in effect. 

The parties propose a deadline for trial witness disclosures. The Court does not set 

such a deadline. The Court previously set the following deadlines by which all parties 

were required to disclose witnesses to the other party: Plaintiff’s expert witness disclosure 

was due December 26, 2018, Defendants’ expert witness disclosure was due January 25, 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2019, and any expert rebuttal opinion was due February 25, 2019. (Doc. 40). Additionally, 

the parties were to disclose all lay witnesses by December 17, 2018. (Doc. 24.) 

Dated this 7th day of March, 2019.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Xinhua China LTD. (the  "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period  ending June 30,  2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Xianping  Wang,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 15, 2007



                                        By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                            _____________________________
                                                Xianping Wang
                                                President and  Chief Executive
                                                Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, David L. Swift, President and Chief Executive Officer of Goodman Global, Inc. (the Registrant) and Lawrence M. Blackburn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the period covered by the
Periodic Report and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ David L. SwiftDavid L. SwiftPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Lawrence M. BlackburnLawrence M. BlackburnExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 7, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joseph A Giron, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

Springboard Incorporated, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-04280-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike, which is fully briefed. (Docs. 94-

96.) For the following reasons, the Court shall grant Defendants’ motion.

“The Local Rules do not provide for additional exhibits attached to replies in support 

of summary judgment[.]” EEOC v. Swissport Fueling, Inc., 916 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1015 

(D. Ariz. 2013) (citation omitted). In other words, a reply “may not introduce new facts or 

evidence.” Larson v. United Natural Foods West, Inc., No. CV-10-185-PHX-DGC, 2010 

WL 5297220, at *2 (D. Ariz. Dec. 20, 2010) (emphasis in original) (citing LRCiv 

56.1(m)(2)). In their reply, Plaintiffs submit new exhibits in excess of 130 pages, including 

a previously unaddressed complaint from an unrelated proceeding. (Docs. 87, 90.) 

Plaintiffs have not sought leave of Court and have failed to provide Defendants the 

opportunity to respond to these new facts. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to strike (Doc. 94) is GRANTED.

//
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE Plaintiff’s 

exhibits (Docs. 87, 90) in support of their reply. 

Dated this 1st day of November, 2019.

Douglas L. Rayes

United States District Judge
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Russell Roth, certify that;
 
 (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Las Vegas Gaming, Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
 defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
 within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
 issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: March 30, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Russell Roth
 By: Russell Roth
 Title: Principal Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
   1
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-KSB of Montana Mining Corp. for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small

| | business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 22, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13971]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Friday, June 7, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-13971 Filed 5-30-96; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
---

EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of AEGIS INDUSTRIES, INC. (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I,
Paul Evancoe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Paul
Evancoe

Date: March 14, 2007

Paul Evancoe President and CEO -
Principal Executive Officer

---
#### Ricky HARROLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63769.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 21, 1993.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose. Therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspire Japan, Inc., for the quarter ending July 31, 2009, I, Ken Osako, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aspire Japan, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aspire Japan, Inc.




Dated:  September 16, 2009






Aspire Japan, Inc.




By:
/s/ Ken Osako
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
#### Patrick Lee COTTON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

No. 55177.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 18, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 17, 1989.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 1, 1989.

Michael C. Todt, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breek K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 94-11157 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ERIC STANLEY HARRISON, a/k/a Pablo & Peter, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. #:91-CV-1566-H (3:91-CR-366-H)

- - - - - - - - - - August 24, 1995
Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eric Stanley Harrison's motion for reinstatement of his appeal is GRANTED. Harrison's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. This court may authorize Harrison to proceed IFP on appeal if he is economically eligible and the appeal is not frivolous. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir.No. 94-11157 -2-
1986). Harrison has demonstrated that he is economically eligible to proceed IFP on appeal. Harrison argues that the district court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 by failing to determine if Harrison and his counsel read and discussed the presentence report. A nonconstitutional claim that could have been raised on direct appeal, but was not, may not be raised in a collateral proceeding. United States v. Shaid , 937 F.2d 228, 232 n.7 (5th Cir. 1991) (en banc), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 1076 (1992). An alleged violation of Rule 32 does not raise a constitutional claim cognizable under § 2255.
See United States v. Weintraub , 871 F.2d 1257, 1265-66 (5th Cir. 1989). Further, Harrison could have raised the issue on direct appeal, but failed to do so. Harrison is not entitled to § 2255 relief based on the district court's alleged violation of Rule 32. This claim does not raise a nonfrivolous appellate issue. Harrison argues for the first time on appeal that he was not considered for a U.S.S.G. § 5K1, p.s., departure at sentencing. This court need not address issues not considered by the district court. "[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal are not reviewable by this court unless they involve purely legal questions and failure to consider them would result in manifest injustice." Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). The disposition of this issue would require the resolution of factual questions and, thus, it is not subject to review on appeal. Because Harrison has not raised an issue of arguable merit, the appeal should be dismissed as frivolous. SeeNo. 94-11157 -3-
Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
APPEAL RE-INSTATED; IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
H. Res. 454 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 10, 2009. 

Whereas an estimated 800,000 children are reported missing 

each year in the United States; 

Whereas 200,000 of that number are abducted by family 

members, and 58,000 are abducted by non-family members, for which the primary motive is sexual assault; 

Whereas each year 115 children are the victims of the most 

serious abductions, kidnapped by non-family members 

and either ransomed, murdered, or taken with the intent 

to keep; 

Whereas the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) serves as the national resource center 

and information clearinghouse for missing and exploited 

children; 

Whereas NCMEC was established by Congress in 1984; 

Whereas NCMEC has assisted law enforcement in the recovery of more than 138,500 children; 

Whereas NCMEC’s Amber Alert program has led to 443 recoveries; 

Whereas in 2008, NCMEC helped recover more children than 

any other year in the organization’s 25-year history, rais-
2 

•HRES 454 EH 

ing the recovery rate from 62 percent in 1990 to 97 percent today; 

Whereas NCMEC operates the toll-free 24-hour national 

missing children’s hotline, which has handled more than 

2,377,000 calls; 

Whereas NCMEC provides assistance to families and law enforcement agencies in locating and recovering missing 

and exploited children, both nationally and internationally; 

Whereas NCMEC offers technical assistance and training to 

law enforcement in identifying and locating non-compliant sex offenders; 

Whereas NCMEC has a team of forensic artists who create 

age progression photos, which has assisted in the successful recovery of 895 children; 

Whereas NCMEC CyberTipline has handled more than 

686,000 reports; 

Whereas NCMEC’s Child Victim Identification Program has 

reviewed and analyzed 23,000,000 child pornography images and videos, 8,600,000 in 2008 alone; 

Whereas NCMEC’s sex offender tracking team has already 

located 402 missing sex offenders; 

Whereas NCMEC operates a child victim identification program to assist law enforcement in identifying victims of 

child pornography; 

Whereas NCMEC develops and disseminates programs and 

information about Internet safety and the prevention of 

child abduction and sexual exploitation; 
3 

•HRES 454 EH 

Whereas NCMEC facilitates the deployment of the National 

Emergency Child Locator Center during periods of national disasters; and 

Whereas NCMEC deploys Team Adam, a rapid response and 

support system comprised of retired law enforcement officers, to provide on-site technical assistance to local law 

enforcement agencies investigating cases of child abduction and sexual exploitation: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

the 25th anniversary of the National Center for Missing and 

Exploited Children. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Interim  Capital  Corp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

 /s/ Mark Lindberg
-------------------------
Mark Lindberg
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer