27250 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 106 / Friday, May 31, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Dated: May 22, 1996.

Robert C. Keeney,

Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.

[FR Doc. 96–13617 Filed 5–30–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

7 CFR Part 958

[Docket No. FV96–958–2IFR]

Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onions;

Assessment Rate

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,

USDA.

ACTION: Interim final rule with request

for comments.

SUMMARY: This interim final rule

establishes an assessment rate for the

Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onion Committee

(Committee) under Marketing Order No.

958 for the 1996–97 and subsequent

fiscal periods. The Committee is

responsible for local administration of

the marketing order which regulates the

handling of onions grown in designated

counties in Idaho, and Malheur County,

Oregon.

Authorization to assess onion

handlers enables the Committee to incur

expenses that are reasonable and

necessary to administer the program.

DATES: Effective on July 1, 1996.

Comments received by July 1, 1996, will

be considered prior to issuance of a final

rule.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are

invited to submit written comments

concerning this rule. Comments must be

sent in triplicate to the Docket Clerk,

Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS,

USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2523–S,

Washington, DC 20090–6456, FAX 202–

720–5698. Comments should reference

the docket number and the date and

page number of this issue of the Federal

Register and will be available for public

inspection in the Office of the Docket

Clerk during regular business hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martha Sue Clark, Marketing Order

Administration Branch, Fruit and

Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O.

Box 96456, room 2523–S, Washington,

DC 20090–6456, telephone 202–720–

9918, FAX 202–720–5698, or Robert J.

Curry, Northwest Marketing Field

Office, Fruit and Vegetable Division,

AMS, USDA, Green-Wyatt Federal

Building, room 369–1220 Southwest

Third Avenue, Portland, OR 97204,

telephone 503–326–2724, FAX 503–

326–7440.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule

is issued under Marketing Agreement

No. 130 and Order No. 958, both as

amended (7 CFR part 958), regulating

the handling of onions grown in

designated counties in Idaho, and

Malheur County, Oregon. The order is

effective under the Agricultural

Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as

amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter

referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’

The Department of Agriculture

(Department) is issuing this rule in

conformance with Executive Order

12866.

This rule has been reviewed under

Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice

Reform. Under the marketing order now

in effect, Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion

handlers are subject to assessments.

Funds to administer the order are

derived from such assessments. It is

intended that the assessment rate as

issued herein will be applicable to all

assessable onions beginning July 1,

1996, and continuing until amended,

suspended, or terminated. This rule will

not preempt any State or local laws,

regulations, or policies, unless they

present an irreconcilable conflict with

this rule.

The Act provides that administrative

proceedings must be exhausted before

parties may file suit in court. Under

section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any

handler subject to an order may file

with the Secretary a petition stating that

the order, any provision of the order, or

any obligation imposed in connection

with the order is not in accordance with

law and request a modification of the

order or to be exempted therefrom. Such

handler is afforded the opportunity for

a hearing on the petition. After the

hearing the Secretary would rule on the

petition. The Act provides that the

district court of the United States in any

district in which the handler is an

inhabitant, or has his or her principal

place of business, has jurisdiction to

review the Secretary’s ruling on the

petition, provided an action is filed not

later than 20 days after the date of the

entry of the ruling.

Pursuant to requirements set forth in

the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the

Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)

has considered the economic impact of

this rule on small entities.

The purpose of the RFA is to fit

regulatory actions to the scale of

business subject to such actions in order

that small businesses will not be unduly

or disproportionately burdened.

Marketing orders issued pursuant to the

Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are

unique in that they are brought about

through group action of essentially

small entities acting on their own

behalf. Thus, both statutes have small

entity orientation and compatibility.

There are approximately 550

producers of Idaho-Eastern Oregon

onions in the production area and

approximately 34 handlers subject to

regulation under the marketing order.

Small agricultural producers have been

defined by the Small Business

Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as

those having annual receipts of less than

$500,000. The majority of Idaho-Eastern

Oregon onion producers and handlers

may be classified as small entities.

The Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion

marketing order provides authority for

the Committee, with the approval of the

Department, to formulate an annual

budget of expenses and collect

assessments from handlers to administer

the program. The members of the

Committee are producers and handlers

of Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions. They

are familiar with the Committee’s needs

and with the costs of goods and services

in their local area and are thus in a

position to formulate an appropriate

budget and assessment rate. The

assessment rate is formulated and

discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all

directly affected persons have an

opportunity to participate and provide

input.

The Committee met on March 21,

1996, and unanimously recommended

1996–97 expenditures of $1,115,993 and

an assessment rate of $0.10 per

hundredweight of onions. In

comparison, last year’s budgeted

expenditures were $1,111,447. The

assessment rate of $0.10 is the same as

last year’s established rate. Major

expenditures recommended by the

Committee for the 1996–97 year include

$10,000 for Committee expenses,

$123,593 for salary expenses, $62,400

for travel and office expenses, $60,000

each for research and export, $725,000

for promotion, and $75,000 for a

contingency fund. Budgeted expenses

for these items in 1995–96 were

$10,000, $121,431, $61,600, $59,340,

$60,000, $724,076, and $75,000,

respectively.

The assessment rate recommended by

the Committee was derived by dividing

anticipated expenses by expected

shipments of Idaho-Eastern Oregon

onions. Onion shipments for the year

are estimated at 8,800,000

hundredweight, which should provide

$880,000 in assessment income. Income

derived from handler assessments, along

with funds from interest income and the

Committee’s authorized reserve, will be

adequate to cover budgeted expenses.

Funds remaining in the reserve at the

end of the 1995–96 fiscal period should

be about $1,011,613. Funds in the

reserve will be kept within the

maximum permitted by the order.

While this rule will impose some

additional costs on handlers, the costs
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 106 / Friday, May 31, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 27251

are in the form of uniform assessments

on all handlers. Some of the additional

costs may be passed on to producers.

However, these costs will be offset by

the benefits derived by the operation of

the marketing order. Therefore, the AMS

has determined that this rule will not

have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.

The assessment rate established in

this rule will continue in effect

indefinitely unless modified,

suspended, or terminated by the

Secretary upon recommendation and

information submitted by the

Committee or other available

information.

Although this assessment rate is

effective for an indefinite period, the

Committee will continue to meet prior

to or during each fiscal period to

recommend a budget of expenses and

consider recommendations for

modification of the assessment rate. The

dates and times of Committee meetings

are available from the Committee or the

Department. Committee meetings are

open to the public and interested

persons may express their views at these

meetings. The Department will evaluate

Committee recommendations and other

available information to determine

whether modification of the assessment

rate is needed. Further rulemaking will

be undertaken as necessary. The

Committee’s 1996–97 budget and those

for subsequent fiscal periods will be

reviewed and, as appropriate, approved

by the Department.

After consideration of all relevant

material presented, including the

information and recommendation

submitted by the Committee and other

available information, it is hereby found

that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,

will tend to effectuate the declared

policy of the Act.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also

found and determined upon good cause

that it is impracticable, unnecessary,

and contrary to the public interest to

give preliminary notice prior to putting

this rule into effect, because: (1) the

Committee needs to have sufficient

funds to pay its expenses which are

incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the

1996–97 fiscal period begins on July 1,

1996, and the marketing order requires

that the rate of assessment for each

fiscal period apply to all assessable

onions handled during such fiscal

period; (3) handlers are aware of this

action which was unanimously

recommended by the Committee at a

public meeting and is similar to other

assessment rate actions issued in past

years; and (4) this interim final rule

provides a 30-day comment period, and

all comments timely received will be

considered prior to finalization of this

rule.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 958

Marketing agreements, Onions,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, 7 CFR part 958 is amended as

follows:

PART 958—ONIONS GROWN IN

CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN

IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY,

OREGON

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

part 958 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

2. A new subpart—Assessment Rates

and a new § 958.240 are added to read

as follows:

Note: This section will appear in the Code

of Federal Regulations.

Subpart—Assessment Rates

§ 958.240 Assessment rate.

On and after July 1, 1996, an

assessment rate of $0.10 per

hundredweight is established for IdahoEastern Oregon onions.

Dated: May 22, 1996.

Robert C. Keeney,

Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.

[FR Doc. 96–13618 Filed 5–30–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 96–NM–98–AD; Amendment

39–9638; AD 96–11–13]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell

Douglas Model DC–9–80 Series

Airplanes and Model MD–88 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for

comments.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD) that is

applicable to certain McDonnell

Douglas Model DC–9–80 series

airplanes and Model MD–88 airplanes.

This action requires a visual inspection

to determine the type of fluorescent

light ballasts installed in the cabin

sidewall; and installation of a protective

cover, replacement, or removal/

disconnection, if necessary. This action

also requires removal of the dust

barriers from the outboard ceiling

panels, and installation of modified

outboard ceiling panels. This

amendment is prompted by reports of

smoke, fumes, and/or electrical fire

emitting from the baggage bin of the aft

passenger compartment and from the

dust barriers of the outboard ceiling due

to the failure of the fluorescent light

ballasts. The actions specified in this

AD are intended to prevent a fire in the

passenger compartment, which could

result from failure of the fluorescent

light ballast of the upper and lower

cabin sidewall, and subsequent failure

of the dust barriers of the outboard

ceiling panel.

DATES: Effective June 17, 1996.

The incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the

regulations is approved by the Director

of the Federal Register as of June 17,

1996.

Comments for inclusion in the Rules

Docket must be received on or before

July 30, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in

triplicate to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), Transport

Airplane Directorate, ANM–103,

Attention: Rules Docket No. 96–NM–

98–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,

Renton, Washington 98055–4056.

The service information referenced in

this AD may be obtained from

McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855

Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach,

California 90846, Attention: Technical

Publications Business Administration,

Department C1–L51 (2–60). This

information may be examined at the

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,

Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles

Aircraft Certification Office, Transport

Airplane Directorate, 3960 Paramount

Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at

the Office of the Federal Register, 800

North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,

Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J.

Kirk Baker, Aerospace Engineer,

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–

130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft

Certification Office, 3960 Paramount

Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712;

telephone (310) 627–5345; fax (310)

627–5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

has received two reports of smoke,

fumes, and/or electrical fire emitting

from the baggage bin of the aft passenger

compartment and from the dust barriers

of the outboard ceiling panel on

McDonnell Douglas Model DC–9–82

(MD–82) series airplanes. Investigation

revealed that the existing design of the