24814 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Notices

Section 0.104 of Title 28 of the Code of

Federal Regulations.

On April 1, 1996, an interim notice

establishing revised 1996 aggregate

production quotas for amobarbital and

hydromorphone was published in the

Federal Register (61 FR 11063). All

interested persons were invited to

comment on or object to these proposed

aggregate production quotas on or before

May 1, 1996. Since no comments or

objections were received, the interim

notice is adopted without change.

The Office of Management and Budget

has determined that notices of aggregate

production quotas are not subject to

centralized review under Executive

Order 12866. This action has been

analyzed in accordance with the

principles and criteria contained in

Executive Order 12612, and it has been

determined that this matter does not

have sufficient federalism implications

to warrant the preparation of a

Federalism Assessment.

The Deputy Administrator hereby

certifies that this action will have no

significant impact upon small entities

whose interests must be considered

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5

U.S.C. 601, et seq. The establishment of

annual aggregate production quotas for

Schedules I and II controlled substances

is mandated by law and by international

treaty obligations. While aggregate

production quotas are of primary

importance to large manufacturers, their

impact upon small entities is neither

negative nor beneficial. Accordingly, the

Deputy Administrator has determined

that this action does not require a

regulatory flexibility analysis.

Therefore, under the authority vested

in the Attorney General by Section 306

of the Controlled Substances Act of

1970 (21 U.S.C. 826), delegated to the

Administrator of the DEA by Section

0.100 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal

Regulations, and redelegated to the

Deputy Administrator, pursuant to

Section 0.104 of Title 28 of the Code of

Federal Regulations, the Deputy

Administrator hereby orders that the

revised 1996 aggregate production

quotas for the listed controlled

substances, expressed in grams of

anhydrous acid or base, be established

as follows:

Basic class

Established

revised 1996

quota

Amobarbital ........................... 301,000

Hydromorphone .................... 718,000

Dated: May 9, 1996.

Stephen H. Greene,

Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–12272 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of April, 1996.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or sub-division have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–32,058; Keystone Brewers, Inc.,

DBA Pittsburgh Brewing Co., Pittsburgh,

PA

TA–W–31,991; General Railway

Signal Corp., SADIB Div., Rochester, NY

TA–W–31,932; Hines Oregon Millwork

Enterprises, Hines, OR

TA–W–31,936; Boise Cascade Corp.,

Vancouver, WA

TA–W–32,145; Tampella Power Corp.,

Williamsport, PA

TA–W–31,929; Hollander Home

Fashions Corp., Rogers, AR

TA–W–32,020; Holliston-Mills, Inc.,

Kingsport, TN

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–32,053; General Mirror Corp.,

Flifton, NJ

TA–W–31,994; Silgan Containers

Corp., Hillsboro, OR

TA–W–32,098; OshKosh B’Gosh,

Columbia Cutting, Columbia, KY

TA–W–32,049; Lifeline

Manufacturing, Inc., Swainsboro, GA

TA–W–32,033; 3M Company, Data

Storage Products, Wahpeton, ND

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–32,229; Fashion Development

Center, Inc., El Paso, TX

TA–W–31,986; Alemeda Equipment

Co., Inc., Master Equipment Center,

Amherst, NY

TA–W–31,924; Marine Transport

Lines, Inc., Weehawken, NJ

TA–W–32,069; Turnkey Services, El

Paso, TX, Workers Leasted to And

Working At Thompson Consumer

Electronics, El Paso, TX

TA–W–32,031; Brown Group, Inc.,

Cloth World Div., Clayton, MO

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–31,945; FMC/Crosby Valve &

Gage Co., Wretham, MA

The investigation revealed that

criterion (2) and criterion (3) have not

been met. Sales or production did not

decline during the relevant period as

required for certification. Increases of

imports of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

the firm or appropriate subdivision have

not contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

TA–W–32,030; Allied Signal

Aerospace Government Electronics

Systems, South Montrose, PA: February

28, 1995.

TA–W–31,928; McAllen Separation

Co., Mt. Gilead, NC: January 29, 1995.

TA–W–32,047; Laceyfair Mills Corp.,

Ratcliff, AR: February 23, 1995.

TA–W–32,228; Quintana Petroleum

Products, Houston, TX: March 15, 1995.

TA–W–32,203; Tetile Networks, Inc.,

Knoxville, TN: February 6, 1995.

TA–W–32,217; C.R. Bard, Inc.,

Medical Div., Nogales, AZ: April 3,

1995.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Notices 24815

TA–W–32,136; Softwear, Doniphan,

MO: March 14, 1995.

TA–W–32,150; Wavetek Corp., San

Diego, CA: March 15, 1995.

TA–W–32,064; Turbotville Dress, Inc.,

Turbotville, PA: March 1, 1995.

TA–W–32,072; BR Holding Ltd,

Racine Steel, PA: March 12, 1995.

TA–W–32,037; Century Place, Inc.,

Cutting Div., Salisbury, NC: February 22,

1995.

TA–W–31,950; Raintree Buckles &

Jewelry, Inc., North Hollywood, CA:

February 6, 1995.

TA–W–32,077; SPX Corp., Kent-Moore

Div., Jackson, MI: March 5, 1995.

TA–W–32,078; SPX Corp., Kent Moore

Distribution Center, Roseville, MI:

March 5, 1995.

TA–W–31,969; Hasbro Manufacturing

Service, El Paso, TX: March 16, 1996.

TA–W–32,032; Oregon Cedar Products

Co., Springfield, OR: February 15, 1995.

TA–W–32,035; Price Pfister, Racoima,

CA: February 19, 1995.

TA–W–32,041; Manhattan Fashions,

Inc., Union City, NJ: February 27, 1995.

TA–W–32,147; Terminal Fabrication,

Inc., Freeport, IL: February 28, 1995.

TA–W–32,169; Diversified Apparel

Resources, Inc., Pulaski, VA: March 21,

1995.

TA–W–32,204; Cenex, Inc.,

Bakersfield, CA: March 25, 1995.

TA–W–31,913; The Florsheim Shoe

Co., Cape Girardeau, MO: May 17, 1995.

TA–W–32,174; Suzette Fashion, Jersey

City, NJ: March 19, 1995.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of April, 1996.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) that a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers; firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) that sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) that imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases in imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) that there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–00898; Oshkosh

B’Gosh, Columbia Cutting, Columbia,

KY

NAFTA–TAA–00845; Holliston Mills,

Inc., Kingsport, TN

NAFTA–TAA–00874; 3M Company,

Data Storage Products, Wahpeton, ND

NAFTA–TAA–00894; BR Holdings,

Ltd., Racine Steel Castings, Racine, WI

NAFTA–TAA–00872; Western

Interlock, Inc., Dallas, OR

NAFTA–TAA–00917 & A; SPX Corp.,

Kent-Moore Div., Jackson, MI, SPX

Corp., Kent-Moore Distribution Center,

Roseville, MI

NAFTA–TAA–00883; Tampella Power

Corp., Williamsport, PA

NAFTA–TAA–00828; Raintree,

Buckles & Jewelry, Inc., North

Hollywood, CA

NAFTA–TAA–00863; Silgan

Containers Corp., Hillsboro, OR

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

NAFTA–TAA–00862; Worldcrisa

Corp., Wallingford, CT

NAFTA–TAA–00893; Panhandle

Eastern Corp., d/b/a Panenergy Corp.,

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Div., Pan

Service Co. Div., Trunkline Gas Co. Div.,

Houston, TX & Operating in Other

States

The investigation revealed that the

workers of the subject firm did not

produce an article within the meaning

of Section 250(a) of the Trade Act, as

amended.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

NAFTA–TAA–00848; Pal Plastics

Corp., Rochester, NY: February 21,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00878; Oregon Cedar

Products Co., Springfield, OR: February

15, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00865; Century Place,

Inc., Cutting Div., Salisbury, NC:

February 22, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00884; Price Pfister,

Pacoima, CA: February 29, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00888; W.R. Grace &

Co.—Conn., Grace Construction

Products, New Castle, PA: March 6,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00889; Sun Belt Fixtures,

Inc., El Paso, TX: March 6, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00900; Reynolds Metal

Co., Louisville, KY: March 13, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00823; Hasbro

Manufacturing Services, El Paso,

TX: February 1, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00928; United

Technologies Automotive Wiring

Systems Div., Plymouth, IN: March

22, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00880; Weyerhauser Co.,

Green Mountain Longview Lumber

Unit, Longview, WA: March 1, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00956; Lindal Cedar

Homes, Inc., Kent, WA: March 5,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00882; Elco Corp.,

Huntingdon, PA: March 4, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00897; Stapleton

Garment Co., (Knight Industries),

Stapleton, GA: March 11, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00903; United

Technologies Automotive, Input

Controls Div., St. Matthews, SC:

March 14, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00908; UGG Holdings,

Inc., Original American UHGS Co.,

Portland, OR: February 27, 1995.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of April 1996.

Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC 20210 during normal business hours

or will be mailed to persons who write

to the above address.

Dated: April 26, 1996.

Russell Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy and

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96–12295 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M