U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Animal Environmental Systems Research: Bowling Green, KY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models & Software
                        Sorption Isotherm Spreadsheets
                                    Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) Model
                                    Modified Arcsine Log Calibration Curve (ALCC)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Bowling Green, Kentucky Food Animal Environmental Systems Research Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            OSMOND, DEANNA - North Carolina State Universityitem
                                            Bolster, Carlitem
                                            CABRERA, MIGUEL - University Of Georgiaitem
                                            FEAGLEY, SAM - Texas A&M Universityitem
                                            HAGGARD, BRIAN - University Of Arkansasitem
                                            MITCHELL, CHARLES - Auburn Universityitem
                                            MYLAVARAPU, RAO - University Of Floridaitem
                                            OLDHAM, LARRY - Mississippi State Universityitem
                                            SHARPLEY, ANDREW - University Of Arkansasitem
                                            WALKER, FORBES - University Of Tennesseeitem
                                            ZHANG, HAILIN - Oklahoma State University
  Submitted to: Waste to Worth Conference
                                    Publication Type: Proceedings
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 2/10/2014
                                    Publication  Date: 4/2/2015
                                    Citation: Osmond, D., Bolster, C.H., Cabrera, M., Feagley, S., Haggard, B., Mitchell, C., Mylavarapu, R., Oldham, L., Sharpley, A., Walker, F., Zhang, H. 2015. Phosphorus Indices: What is the water quality goal?. Waste to Worth Conference. http://articles.extension.org/pages/72818/phosphorus-indices:-what-is-the-water-quality-goal.Interpretive Summary: In this study we used water quality data and land use information from field-scale experiments to evaluate the accuracy of phosphorus risk assessment tools used throughout the South. Measured P loads and land use/management information such as the amount and timing of P applied as fertilizer and/or manure and tillage, as well as site characteristics such as rainfall, soil series, and crop or forage management were collected from the following states: AR, GA, MS, NC, OK, and TX. This information was used to run each southern P Index. We then compared the ratings from each state’s phosphorus index and compared them against the total and soluble P loads that were measured from each study site. In order to compare load losses with qualitative P indices, measured total P loads were transformed based on USDA-NRCS tentative guidelines of Low (0-2 lb P/ac), Medium (2-5 lb P/ac), and High (>5 lb P/ac) P loss. Not surprisingly, there were some notable differences between state-P Indices for the same set of data, but there was often considerable uniformity. However, what was less clear is what the P-Index ratings mean for water quality protection. The analysis left us with many difficult questions on how to relate edge-of-field P loss to more complex water quality criteria and thresholds.
                                Technical Abstract: We have collected water quality and land use data from plot- and field-scale studies throughout the South (AR, GA, MS, NC, OK, and TX). The water quality data provide information on runoff and P concentrations and loads. Land use data provide information on management practices, including the amount and timing of P applied as fertilizer and/or manure and tillage, as well as site characteristics such as rainfall, soil series, and crop or forage management. This information was used to run each southern P Index. Four of the indices are considered component, in that the rating is in lbs P/ac/year. The remaining eight P Indices are either additive or multiplicative and final ratings are qualitative. We then compared the state ratings against each other and against the total and soluble P loads that were measured from each study site. In order to compare load losses with qualitative P indices, measured total P loads were transformed based on USDA-NRCS tentative guidelines of Low (0-2 lb P/ac), Medium (2-5 lb P/ac), and High (>5 lb P/ac) P loss. When we compared the data, there were expected differences between state-P Indices for the same set of data, but there was often considerable uniformity. However, what was less clear is what the P-Index ratings mean for water quality protection. The analysis left us with many difficult questions on how to relate edge-of-field P loss to more complex in-stream or lake P criteria and thresholds.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov