alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
No. 32.1


Form
10-Q


Signet
International Holdings, Inc.


File No.
000-51185






Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ernest
W. Letiziano, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            the Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




(2)
            the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Date: May
      19, 2009
            By: /s/
      Ernest W. Letiziano
              Ernest W. Letiziano
              Chief Executive Officer
              and Chief Financial Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT  23.1


                               BEDINGER & COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Bedinger & Company
1200 Concord Avenue, Suite 250
Concord, California 94520


June 6, 2005


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent to use in this Form  10-KSB  (Restated)  of our report  dated
December 15, 2004, (except for Note M, which is dated May 20, 2005), relating to
the financial  statements of Superclick,  Inc. (A Development Stage Company) for
the years  ended  October  31,  2004 and 2003 and for the period from August 24,
2000 (Date of Inception) to October 31, 2004.


                                        /s/ Bedinger & Company

                                        Certified Public Accountants
##### 



a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; anb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Gordon F. DuGanGordon F. DuGanVice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### In Interest of R.M.P.

No. 67903.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 26, 1996.

R. Timothy Bickhaus, Macon, for appellant.

Michael P. Wilson, Prosecuting Attorney, Monroe County, Paris, for Juvenile Officer.

Thomas Peter Danielsons, Hannibal, for Natural Father, Joseph Pratt, Jr.

Mark S. Wasinger, Hannibal, Guardian Ad Litem, R.M.P., minor.

Before KAROHL, Acting P.J., and GRIMM and DOWD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the termination of her parental rights. She alleges: (1) the instant proceeding is barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel; (2) the trial court’s findings under § 211.447 are not supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence; and (3) the trial court’s finding that termination would be in the best interests of the child is not supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*401The trial court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**§
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Kandi Technologies, Corp. (the
“Company”) for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hu
      Xiaoming, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
      of
      the Company, and Zhu Xiaoying, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
      and
      Accounting Officer) of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
      best of his knowledge, that:







(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
Hu
      Xiaoming


Name:  Hu
      Xiaoming


Title:  President
      and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May
      15,
      2008





/s/
Zhu
      Xiaoying


Name:  Zhu
      Xiaoying


Title:  Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:  May
      15,
      2008







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**UNDER      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

      The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this      Report.

|                                              |                                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November                14, 2007 | By:                                                                                | /s/                Mitchell B.                Rubin                    |
|                                              | Mitchell                B. Rubin                                                   |
|                                              | Chief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial Officer) |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                         SIERRA NEVADA ADVISORS, INC.
                        5505 E. Carson Street, Ste. 341
                              Lakewood, CA 90713
                    Phone (562) 421-2063 Fax (562) 421-7443


October 5, 1999

Ms. Tami Tischner, President
Color Strategies, Inc.
5015 W. Sahara Ave., #184
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

Dear Ms. Tischner:

This letter agreement (the "Agreement") shall confirm the engagement of Sierra
Nevada Advisors, Inc. ("Sierra") to serve as Corporate Finance Advisor, whereby
"Sierra" will advise "Color" with regards to issues such as the raising of funds
as a public company, introducing potential acquisition candidates and
introducing "Color" to potential investors.

"Sierra" agrees to commit at least 20 hours per month to completing the
aforementioned duties, for a period of 3 months beginning at the signing of this
Agreement.

"Color" agrees to pay "Sierra" the sum of $10,000 in order to secure the
Advisory services of "Sierra", to be paid at the signing of this agreement.

Yours truly
SIERRA NEVADA ADVISORS, INC.

By:  /s/ D. Mihran Freeland
   -------------------------
D. Mihran Freeland
President


COLOR STRATEGIES

Agreed on this 5th day of October 1999.

By:  /s/ Tami Tischner
   -------------------------
Tami Tischner
President
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Orlando MAUFAS, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67796.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1994, and felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender under § 558.016, RSMO 1994, and as a persistent offender under § 558.019, RSMo 1994, to twenty years and five years consecutively.

On appeal, defendant raises one plain error point. He contends the trial court erred in permitting certain hearsay evidence.

Plain error may be considered when this court finds that manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice would result if the error were not considered. Rule 30.20. We decline defendant’s request to consider plain error. The evidence of defendant’s guilt is strong. Further, defendant acknowledged *454the offenses by showing the officers where to find many of the stolen items.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.26(b).
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of 51148,
Inc. for the quarter ending April 30, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 51148, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April
          30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending April 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          51148, Inc.

Dated:  June 14, 2005

51148, INC.

By: /s/ Scott Raleigh
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandro Natale, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
      December 21,
      2009
              /s/
      Sandro NataleSandro
      NataleChief
      Executive Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Rodney CLAYTON, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 60195.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Jan. 24, 1995.

Lew Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., and SMITH and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of first degree murder and one count of armed criminal action in violation of §§ 565.020 and 571.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of parole and life imprisonment consecutively.

Defendant appealed; we remanded for a *Batson*
      * hearing but otherwise affirmed. *State v. Clayton,*849 S.W.2d 259 (Mo.App.E.D.1993). The trial court conducted the *Batson*hearing and determined that the State’s reasons for striking black jurors were racially neutral. Defendant appealed.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

*Batson v. Kentucky,*476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
November 6, 2006
    
    /s/ Vincent R. Volpe Jr.Vincent R. Volpe Jr.President, Chief Executive Officer andDirector
 Page 39 of 40
LEVALL FINANCE CORP. LLC 



September 28, 2006 



Mr.           Philip S. Pesin 
Auriga
Laboratories, Inc.  
Chairman & CEO
5555 Triangle Parkway, Suite 300  
Norcross, GA
30092  



Dear Mr. Pesin: 



        The
letter agreement shall amend that certain Senior Secured Promissory Note entered into by
and between Auriga Laboratories, Inc. (“Company”) and Levall Finance Corp. LLC
(“LFC”) dated as August 29, 2006 (the “Note”). This amendment shall be
deemed effective as of August 29, 2006. 



        Section
2 of the Note shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 



	 	
“Section
2. Warrants. Concurrent herewith, the Company shall deliver to Holder a warrant
exercisable for 1,500,000 fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s
common stock at the exercise price of $1.92 in the form of warrant attached hereto as
Exhibit A.” 






        The
first sentence of Section 3 of the Note shall be amended and restated in its entirety as
follows: 



	 	
“Section
3. Maturity. Upon the earlier of (i) the closing of a Qualified Financing (as defined
below), or (ii) December 15, 2006 (the “Maturity Date”), the entire outstanding
principal balance of, and all accrued and unpaid interest on, this Note shall mature and
be due and payable to the Holder by the Company.” 






        The
following sentence shall be added to Section 5: “The royalty obligation under this
Section 5 shall exist in perpetuity.” 



        Section
6(d) shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 



          		        (d)       
               Security Interest. This Note is a direct debt obligation of the Company
               and is secured by a first priority perfected security interest in all of the
               assets of the Company for the benefit of the Holder. Notwithstanding the
               foregoing, the first priority security provided by the Company hereby shall be
               on a pro-rata basis and pari passu to that certain senior secured note
               entered into by the Company and Aquoral Finance Corp. LLC dated as of September
               28, 2006. 



               



        Section
6(j) shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 



          		        (j)       
               Seniority. This Note is pari passu in right of payment to that
               certain senior secured note entered into by the Company and Aquoral Finance
               Corp. LLC dated as of September 28, 2006 but is senior in right of payment to
               any and all other indebtedness of the Company. 



               










        If
the Company is in agreement with these modifications, please sign below. 




	 	
Very
truly yours,                                                      
LEVALL FINANCE CORP.,
LLC                                                      
By: Sorrento Financial Partners,
LLC, its manager






	 	
/s/
Philip S. Pesin    
Name:    Philip S. Pesin
Managing Member









AGREED AND ACCEPTED 
AURIGA
LABORATORIES, INC.  



/s/ Philip S. Pesin 
Philip S.
Pesin
Chairman & CEO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Daniel J. O’Connor, Jr., Bar No. 010081

Justin D. Holm, Bar No. 025202

O’CONNOR & CAMPBELL, P.C.

7955 South Priest Drive

Tempe, AZ 85284

daniel.oconnor@occlaw.com

justin.holm@occlaw.com

602-241-7000

Attorneys for Defendant Philip Mitchell Brailsford, Jr.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Monique Portillo,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Philip Brailsford, an Officer of the 

Mesa, Arizona, Police Department, 

Individually and in his Official 

Capacity, John Does I-7, Officers of 

the Mesa, Arizona, Police Department, 

Individually and in their Official 

Capacities,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00178-SRB

BRAILSFORD’S NOTICE OF 

RELATED CASES

Defendant Philip Mitchell Brailsford, Jr. gives notice of a related, 

consolidated action pending before the United States District Court for the District 

of Arizona. Specifically, Plaintiffs Grady and Norma Shaver1 and Laney Sweet, 

E.S. (a minor), N.S. (a minor), and the Estate of Daniel Shaver2 have each filed 

wrongful-death actions involving the same underlying facts and circumstances. 

These actions expressly name Brailsford as a defendant.

 

1 CV-17-00715-PHX-GMS. The Shaver action was initially filed in the Maricopa County Superior 

Court, but was later removed by Defendants.

2 CV-17-00152-PHX-GMS.

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 17 Filed 05/11/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The Sweet action and Shaver action were consolidated on June 23, 2017.3

By agreement among the plaintiffs, Laney Sweet has been designated the lead 

plaintiff.4 The consolidated action is pending before the Honorable G. Murray 

Snow.5 Upon information and belief, both the Sweet and Shaver actions were filed 

before this action.6

Dated: May 11, 2018.

O’CONNOR & CAMPBELL, P.C.

By: /s/ Justin D. Holm

Daniel J. O’Connor, Jr.

Justin D. Holm

Attorneys for Defendant

Philip Mitchell Brailsford, Jr.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 11, 2018 I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, using the 

CM/ECF System. A Notice of Electronic Filing will be served to the following 

registered participants:

Gene N. Chávez

CHAVEZ LAW OFFICES, PA

1220 5th Street

Albuquerque, NM 87102

gene@chavezlawoffices.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Amanda Bennett

 

3 See June 23, 2017 Order, attached as Exhibit 1. All exhibits are authentic copies of the originals.

4 Id.

5 Id.

6 Compare Maricopa County Superior Court Case No. CV 2017-090318 (Shaver) filed January 

10, 2017 and CV-17-00715-PHX-GMS (Sweet) filed January 17, 2017 with Doc. 1 filed January 

18, 2018 (one year later).

Case 2:18-cv-00178-SRB Document 17 Filed 05/11/18 Page 2 of 2
1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Lee Gordon ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

Unknown Party,

 Respondent.

CASE NO:

CV−18−00041−TUC−RM (BGM)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT

 On January 25, 2018, Petitioner filed a pro se Petition which has been

assigned the case number listed above. This case has been assigned to District

Court Judge Rosemary Marquez and has been referred to Magistrate Judge

Bruce G Macdonald (PS) and the Court's Legal Staff. When any action is taken

in this case, you will be notified by Court order.

 DATED this 25th day of January, 2018.

s/Brian D. Karth

Brian D. Karth

District Court Executive/Clerk

cc: Petitioner

Case 4:18-cv-00041-RM--BGM Document 2 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WARNING!

Failure to comply with the following rules will result in your document being STRICKEN

and/or your case being DISMISSED:

(1) You must file a Notice of Change of Address if your address changes.

(2) You must correctly label any further documents with the above assigned

 caption and case numbers. LRCiv 7.1(a).

(3) You must sign your name and date every document you file. FED. R. CIV. P. 11.

(4) If applicable, you must provide an original and one copy of any document to

 be filed. If you request a conformed copy, you must provide an original

 and two (2) copies. LRCiv 5.4. This does not apply to prisoner e−filers.

(5) If applicable, you must mail copies of every document you file to all respondents.

 or their attorneys, FED. R. CIV. P. 5(a), and every document you file

 must include a certificate stating the date a copy of the document was mailed

 to respondents or their attorneys. This does not apply to prisoner e−filers.

(6) The documents you file must not include personal identifiers. FED. R. CIV. P. 5.2.

Case 4:18-cv-00041-RM--BGM Document 2 Filed 01/25/18 Page 2 of 2