alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Jason
Macari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------
|/s/ Jason Macari        |  |  |  |             
|Jason Macari            |  |  |  | May 11, 2007
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Paul Felix Mason, III,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

No. CV-18-08016-PCT-ESW

ORDER

On March 19, 2018, the Court issued an Order (Doc. 10) screening Plaintiff’s 

Complaint (Doc. 1). After finding that the Complaint failed to sufficiently plead a cause 

of action, the Court set March 9, 2018 as Plaintiff’s deadline for filing a First Amended 

Complaint that corrects the deficiencies in the Complaint. (Doc. 10). The Court

subsequently struck the Complaint (Doc. 1). (Doc. 12 at 2).

On March 26, 2018, Plaintiff filed a letter that the Court construed as a First 

Amended Complaint. (Doc. 11). In an April 11, 2018 Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 12), the undersigned recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) for failure to state a cause of action. On April 20, 2018, 

Plaintiff filed a document (Doc. 13) that is docketed as an Objection to the Report and 

Recommendation. On May 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed a copy of the original Complaint

(Doc. 1), to which Plaintiff attached a copy of his letter (Doc. 13) filed on April 20, 2018. 

(Doc. 14). Because Plaintiff’s May 23, 2018 filing (Doc. 14) is duplicative of (i) a 
- 2 - 

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

document (Doc. 1) that the Court has stricken and (ii) Plaintiff’s Objection to the Report 

and Recommendation (Doc. 13),

IT IS ORDERED striking Plaintiff’s May 23, 2018 filing (Doc. 14). 

Dated this 5th day of June, 2018.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

 This Court has previously considered and denied a similar petition for writ of mandamus filed by

2

relator through which he argued that the trial court lacked jurisdiction, and accordingly, abused its discretion

in denying relator's special appearance and plea in abatement. See in re Canales, No. 13-08-00384-CV, 2008

Tex. App. LEXIS 6360, at *1 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi Aug. 15, 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem.

op.). 

NUMBER 13-08-00605-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE MARIO GILBERTO CANALES

On Emergency Motion to Stay November 3, 2008 Trial and

Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

1

Relator, Mario Gilberto Canales, filed an emergency motion to stay and a petition

for writ of mandamus in the above cause on October 27, 2008, arguing that the trial court

lacks subject matter jurisdiction in this divorce and child custody case. The Court, having 2

examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that
relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the emergency

motion to stay and the petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 27 day of October, 2008. th
---

Exhibit
32.1(a)




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




(ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




In
connection with the report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President
and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:
      February 25, 2010
            By:
            /s/    BRUCE A. WILLIAMSONBruce
      A. Williamson
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### Wayne WILLIFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 03-95-00575-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Oct. 25, 1995.

*605Theodore A. Hargrove, III, San Angelo, for Appellant.

Stephen H. Smith, District Attorney, San Angelo, for Appellee.

Before CARROLL, C.J., and JONES and B.A. SMITH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found appellant guilty of burglary of a habitation and assessed punishment at imprisonment for twenty years. Sentence was imposed in open court on June 23, 1995. A motion for new trial was timely filed and subsequently overruled by operation of law. Notice of appeal was filed on September 25, 1995.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely. Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(1). Although the notice was filed within the fifteen-day grace period, no motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal was presented to this Court. Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(2). In his response to our notice that the notice of appeal was untimely, counsel for appellant stated that he was told by trial counsel that notice of appeal had been filed and did not discover that this was not so until September 25. Counsel does not explain why he did not request an extension of time pursuant to rule 41(b)(2).

Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court is without jurisdiction. *Rodarte v. State,*860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex.Crim.App.1993); *Shute v. State,*744 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). In a recent opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that courts of appeals may not employ rule 2(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to suspend appellate time limits. *Garza v. State,*896 S.W.2d 192 (Tex.Crim.App.1995). Thus, while good cause for doing so is shown, we may not suspend the requirements of rule 41(b)(1) and deem appellant’s notice of appeal timely filed. Counsel asks this Court to consider ■ appellant’s affidavit of indigence and request for appointment of counsel on appeal as a notice of appeal. Rule 40(b)(1), however, demands “an independent written notice of appeal.” *Shute,*744 S.W.2d at 97. Counsel also asks us to treat the untimely notice of appeal as an “improperly titled” motion for extension of time. But this “motion” was not presented to us within the time prescribed by rule 41(b)(2) and under *Garza*this time cannot be extended.

But for the opinion in *Garza,*we would suspend the appellate time limit and permit this appeal to proceed. In light of *Garza,*however, appellant must await this Court’s mandate of dismissal, after which he may file a post-conviction application for writ of habe-as corpus. Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 11.07, § 2 (West Supp.1995). The Court of Criminal Appeals will then almost certainly grant appellant an out-of-time appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.
**Exhibit10.99**

**INTERCOMPANYSERVICES EXTENSION AGREEMENT**

This Extension Agreementdated as of January 1, 2007 is by and between Hallmark Cards, Incorporated (“Hallmark”)and Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (“Crown Holdings”).

WHEREAS, Crown Holdingsand Hallmark have previously entered into that certain Intercompany ServicesAgreement between the parties dated as of December 23, 2002 (the “ServicesAgreement”) as extended on January 1, 2006; and

WHEREAS, the partiesdesire to further extend the term of the Services Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, CrownHoldings and Hallmark hereby agree as follows:

The term of the LicenseAgreement shall be extended for an additional period terminating on January 1,2008, subject to any earlier termination pursuant to the terms of the ServicesAgreement.

All other terms andconditions of the Services Agreement will remain unchanged and in full forceand effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theparties hereto have executed this Extension Agreement as of the date set forthabove.
| HALLMARK CARDS, INCORPORATED |                      |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| By:                     | /s/ Brian Gardner         |   |   |  |
| Title:                  | Executive Vice President. |   |   |   |
|                         |                      |   |
| CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.   |                      |   |
| By:                     | /s/ C. Stanford           |   |   |  |
| Title:                  | Executive Vice President  |   |   |   |

 

 

----
|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March      31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended;  and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 7, 2009 | By:  | /s/ David      S. Boone               |   |
|-------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |      | David      S. Boone                        |   |
|                    |      | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |      |                                       |   |

|    | By:  | /s/ Steven      J. Armond |   |
|--------------|-----------|--------------------------------|--------|
|         |      | Steven      J. Armond          |   |
|         |      | Chief      Financial Officer   |   |
|         |      |                           |   |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14130]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Southern Winds International, 37920 Bright Common, Fremont, CA 
94536, Officers: Bruce J. Joiner, President, Michelle L. Gilbert, 
Secretary.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14130 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
Exhibit 32.1






Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ernest W. Letiziano, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: August 16, 2010
By: /s/ Ernest W. Letiziano

Ernest W. Letiziano

Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mario HAMPTON, Appellant. Mario HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60248, 64020.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

June 28, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 4, 1994.

Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by jury trial of burglary in the second degree in violation of § 569.170, RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced as a Class X offender to twelve years imprisonment. Defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion was denied after evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals both the judgment entered upon his conviction and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, which appeals have been consolidated. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judg*601ment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                              RED BELL BREWING CO.
                          (A Pennsylvania Corporation)

                     5% CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURE

                                   VILLARS II

                     THIS DEBENTURE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED
                        UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
                        OR ANY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTE

                                  $115,000.00
                             Due September 1, 2006

Philadelphia, PA                                        Dated September 27, 1996


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, and intending to be legally bound hereby, RED BELL
BREWING CO., a Pennsylvania corporation, having an address at 3100 West
Jefferson Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19121 ("Company"), hereby promises
to pay to VILLARS II, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership ("Obligee"),
having an address at 334 Louella Avenue, Wayne, PA 19087, or such other place as
Obligee may designate in writing, the principal sum of One Hundred Fifteen
Thousand Dollars ($115,000) lawful money of the United States of America, on
September 1, 2006 ("Date of Maturity"), together with interest on the unpaid
principal balance of the Debenture at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum,
from the date of the Debenture, payable semi-annually, on the 1st day of March
and the 1st day of September in each year, commencing March 1, 1997, at the
address of Obligee set forth above or such other place as Obligee may designate
in writing.

     This Debenture has been issued pursuant to a separate Debenture Purchase
Agreement of even date herewith between Company and the Obligee, and is in all
respects subject to the

<PAGE>   2
provisions of such Agreement, which is incorporated by reference herein. As
provided therein, this Debenture is subject to prepayment, in whole or in part,
after a certain date.

     At the option of the holder hereof, the principal amount of this
Debenture, subject to adjustment, is convertible into fully paid and
nonassessable shares of Company's Common Stock, upon the terms and conditions
and subject to the limitations set forth in the Agreement, as an initial
conversion price, subject to adjustment, of $2.50 per share.

     This Debenture and all payments hereon, including principal and interest,
are subordinated to Company's Senior Debt and certain other debt, as defined in
the Agreement, to the extent and in the manner specified therein.

     Company agrees to make payment of the principal on the date specified in
the Agreement.

     If an event of default, as defined in the Agreement, occurs and is
continuing, the principal of this Debenture may be declared due and payable in
the manner and with the effect provided in the Agreement.


                                             RED BELL BREWING CO.


Corporate Seal                               By: /s/ James R. Bell
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                                      President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVID PATTERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 136 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 482 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 482

  Congratulating Miss Kristen Dalton for being crowned Miss USA 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2009

 Mr. Kissell submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating Miss Kristen Dalton for being crowned Miss USA 2009.

Whereas Kristen Dalton grew up in Concord, North Carolina, and now lives in 
        Wilmington, North Carolina;
Whereas Kristen Dalton is currently an honors college psychology and Spanish 
        major at East Carolina University (ECU);
Whereas Kristen Dalton is the ECU Vice-President of Leadership for ODK National 
        Leadership Honors Society, the Vice-President of Psychology Honors 
        Society, and she plans leadership events and forums on campus;
Whereas Kristen Dalton has lived in and completed mission work in Guatemala and 
        Spain, and is eager to travel to South Africa to work on the AIDS 
        campaign and other countries around the world;
Whereas Kristen Dalton won the Miss USA crown on April 19, 2009, in Las Vegas, 
        Nevada;
Whereas the pageant included contestants from all 50 States and the District of 
        Columbia;
Whereas Kristen Dalton won Miss North Carolina in November 2008;
Whereas Kristen Dalton also served as former Miss Greater Wilmington 2006 as 
        well;
Whereas Kristen Dalton's mother, Jennie Dalton, was Miss North Carolina USA in 
        1982, and her sister Julia Dalton, served as Miss Teen North Carolina 
        USA in 2008; and
Whereas Kristen Dalton will go on to represent the United States in the Miss 
        Universe pageant which will be held in the Bahamas in August 2009: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Miss 
Kristen Dalton for being crowned Miss USA 2009.
                                 <all>
```
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Mirna Isabel Bailon, 

Defendant. 

NO. 18-01029MJ 

MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER OF 

DETENTION 

 Defendant, Mirna Isabel Bailon, having been charged in the District of Arizona 

with a violation of Count One of Title 8 United States Code Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

and the Magistrate Judge having determined from the affidavit of the Department of 

Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection filed in this case, the following 

persons can provide testimony that is material to the offense(s) alleged in the complaint: 

Santiago Ceja-Vivas 

Daniel Hernandez-Ignacio 

 The Magistrate Judge finds that it may become impracticable to secure the 

presence of the witness(es) by subpoena in further proceedings because they are not in 

the United States legally and have no legal residence or employment in this Country. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the witness(es) shall be detained pursuant to 18 USC ' 3144 

in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or 

serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The witness(es) shall be 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. 

 Dated this 12th day of January, 2018.