alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26892-26893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13381]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE-
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers


Availability of Surplus Land and Buildings Located on Fort 
Greely, Alaska

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice identifies surplus real property located within 
the cantonment area of Fort Greely, Alaska. Fort Greely is located 107 
miles southeast of Fairbanks, Alaska, and is 5 miles south of Delta 
Junction, Alaska. The Richardson Highway traverses the eastern portion 
of the installation. Delta Junction is the northern terminus of the 
Alaska Highway.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For more information regarding particular properties identified in this 
notice (i.e., acreage, floor plans, existing sanitary facilities, 
etc.), contact Angie Gori, U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska, ATTN: 
CENPA-RE-MD, Post Office Box 898, Anchorage, Alaska 99506-0898, 
telephone 907/753-2845, or Mr. Woodruff at the below address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This surplus property is available under the

[[Page 26893]]

provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 
1949 and the Base Closure Community Redevelopment and Homeless 
Assistance Act of 1994. Notices of interest should be forwarded to the 
Delta/Greely Community Coalition, ATTN: Mr. Ray Woodruff, Executive 
Director, Post Office Box 780, Delta Junction, Alaska 99737-0780, 
telephone 907/895-1081.
    The surplus real property consists of a parcel of land containing 
1,785 acres and includes 210 buildings and facilities. The current 
range of uses include training, maintenance, research and development, 
storage, medical, administrative, barracks, family housing, transient 
quarters, community and utility plants.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13381 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-NL-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Bernard Joseph Lee Marrietta,

Defendant.

No. CR-17-01675-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER

On August 22, 2022, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released 

on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 22nd day of August, 2022.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:17-cr-01675-JJT Document 35 Filed 08/22/22 Page 1 of 1
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 22, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Cery B. Perle                                                                                                                |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Cery B. Perle President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal executive officer, principal financialand accounting officer) |   |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13782]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Agency Insurance Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for 
OMB review of the information collection system described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal without change in the substance or method 
of collection.
    Title: Prompt Corrective Action.
    Form Number: None.
    OMB Number: 3064-0115.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: June 30, 1996.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management 
and Budget, OIRA, Paperwork Reduction Project (3064-0115), Washington, 
D.C. 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Steven F. Hanft, (202) 898-3907, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-400, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 
550 17th Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before July 3, 1996.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the submission may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above. Comments regarding the 
submission should be addressed to both the OMB reviewer and the FDIC 
contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Prompt Corrective Actions provisions of 
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 
(FDICIA, section 131) require or permit the FDIC and other federal 
banking agencies to take certain supervisory actions when the FDIC-
insured institutions fall within one of five capital categories. They 
also restrict or prohibit certain activities and require the submission 
of a capital restoration plan when an insured institution becomes 
undercapitalized. Various provisions of the statute and the FDIC's 
implementing regulations require the prior approval of the FDIC before 
an FDIC-supervised institution can engage in certain activities, or 
allow the FDIC to make exceptions to restrictions that would otherwise 
be imposed. This collection consists of the applications that are 
required to obtain the FDIC's prior approval.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Robert E. Feldman,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13782 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
TN: Victor Martinez-Eusebio
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00487-CR

William Berry Pierce, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN SABA COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 5581, HONORABLE JAMES F. CLAWSON JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

On May 25, 2010, this Court ordered Lou Ann Lindeman Berry, court reporter for the

33rd District Court, San Saba County, to appear on June 23, 2010, to show cause why she should

not be held in contempt for her failure to file the reporter’s record in this cause as ordered. Based

on Berry’s representation that the record had been destroyed, the order provided that Berry would

be relieved of her obligation to appear if she filed an affidavit describing in detail the status of the

record, the circumstances surrounding its loss, and any efforts made to recover the record. As

requested, Berry has filed an affidavit stating that all copies of the record have either been deleted

or destroyed by a computer virus, that attempts have been made to recover the record from Berry’s

computer, and that these attempts have been unsuccessful. 

This appeal is hereby abated for a determination of whether the reporter’s record can

be replaced by agreement of the parties. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f)(4). The trial court is directed
2

to forward a record of any proceedings related to this determination, including findings of fact and

conclusions of law, to this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. In the event that the

reporter’s record cannot be replaced, the appellant will be entitled to a new trial. See Tex. R. App.

P. 34.6(f).

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Filed: July 21, 2010

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of SupportSoft, Inc.



|                                          |  |                                                        
|----------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                        |  | State or Jurisdiction in whichIncorporated or
Organized
|Domestic Subsidiaries                     |  |                                                        
|Support.com Gift Cards, Inc.              |  | California                                             
|Support.com International, Inc.           |  | Delaware                                               
|                                          | 
|Foreign Subsidiaries                      |  |                                                        
|SupportSoft Australia Pty Ltd             |  | Australia                                              
|SupportSoft Belgium BVBA                  |  | Belgium                                                
|SupportSoft Canada Inc.                   |  | Canada                                                 
|YourTechOnline.com Inc.                   |  | Canada                                                 
|SupportSoft Greater China Limited         |  | China (Hong Kong)                                      
|SupportSoft GmbH                          |  | Germany                                                
|SupportSoft India Pvt Ltd                 |  | India                                                  
|Support.com Mexico S. de R.L. de C. V.    |  | Mexico                                                 
|Support.com Servicios S. de R.L. de C. V. |  | Mexico                                                 
|SupportSoft Asia Pacific Pte Ltd          |  | Singapore                                              
|SupportSoft España SL                     |  | Spain                                                  
|SupportSoft (UK) Pty Ltd                  |  | UK
#### B. G. Smith Real Estate, Respondent, *v.*Frank Byrne et al., Appellants. B. G. Smith Real Estate, Respondent, *v.*Edward J. Beers, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 24, 1952.

*Paul H. Riess*for appellants.

*Per Curiam.*

The mere keeping of a dog in an apartment in contravention of the terms of a lease is not a breach of a substantial obligation of tenancy. The acceptance of rent after giving notice of termination of tenancy pursuant to a conditional limitation clause in a lease and before the institution of summary proceedings waives the alleged breach and the tenant is not holding over without the permission of the landlord.

The final orders should he reversed, with $30 costs as of one appeal, and final orders directed for tenants, with costs.

Hammer, Eder and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Orders reversed, etc.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00274

- CV

J. M. , Appellant

v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 19

- 008196 , THE HONORABLE CATHERINE MA UZY , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant J. M. filed her notice of appeal on June 14, 2021 . The appellate

record was complete on July 29, 2021 , making appellant’s brief due on August 18, 2021

. On
August 18, 2021 , counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief

.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting
extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order Lisa M. Mims to file appellant’s

brief no later than September 2, 2021 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be
required to show cause why she should not b e held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on August 2 6 , 2021

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25801-25802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12785]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 25802]]

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Part 301-4

[FTR Amendment 48]
RIN 3090-AF88


Federal Travel Regulation; Privately Owned Vehicles Mileage 
Reimbursement

AGENCY: Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, GSA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule increases the mileage reimbursement rates for 
use of a privately owned vehicle (POV) on official travel to reflect 
current costs of operation as determined in cost studies conducted by 
the General Services Administration (GSA). The governing regulation is 
revised to increase the mileage allowance for advantageous use of a 
privately owned automobile from 30 cents to 31 cents per mile and the 
cost of a privately owned motorcycle from 24.5 cents to 25 cents per 
mile, and decrease the cost of operating a privately owned airplane 
from 88.5 cents to 85 cents per mile.

DATES:  Effective date: This final rule is effective June 7, 1996.
    Applicability date: The privately owned vehicle (POV) mileage 
reimbursement rates apply for official travel performed on or after 
June 7, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vella Cloyd, General Services 
Administration, Travel and Transportation Management Policy Division 
(MTT), Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202-501-1538.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GSA has determined that this rule is not a 
significant regulatory action for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 
of September 30, 1993. This final rule is not required to be published 
in the Federal Register for notice and comment. Therefore, the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply.

List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 301-4

    Government employees, Travel, Travel allowances, Travel and 
transportation expenses.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 41 CFR part 301-4 is 
amended as follows:

PART 301-4--REIMBURSEMENT FOR USE OF PRIVATELY OWNED CONVEYANCES

    1. The authority citation for part 301-4 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5701-5709; E.O. 11609, 36 FR 13747, 3 CFR, 
1971-1975 Comp., p. 586.

    2. Section 301-4.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) through 
(a)(3) to read as follows:


Sec. 301-4.2  When use of a privately owned conveyance is advantageous 
to the Government.

    (a) * * *
    (1) For use of a privately owned automobile: 31 cents per mile.
    (2) For use of a privately owned airplane: 85 cents per mile
    (3) For use of a privately owned motorcycle: 25 cents per mile.
* * * * *
    Dated: April 30, 1996.
David J. Barram,
Acting Administrator of General Services.
[FR Doc. 96-12785 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-24-M
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.3

            AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 2000 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN


                                      11
<PAGE>

                                AMENDMENT NO. 2

                                     TO THE

                                DRKOOP.COM, INC.

                      2000 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN

     drkoop.com, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of State of
Delaware (the "Company"), hereby adopts this Amendment No. 2 to the drkoop.com,
               -------
Inc. 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").
                                                ----

          WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted the Plan which, among
     other things, contemplated the issuance of options to purchase up to an
     aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company;

          WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted the an Amendment to the
     Plan which (i) revised the eligibility provisions of the Plan and (ii)
     increased the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company reserved for
     issuance under the Plan from 2,000,000 to 20,000,000 shares;

          WHEREAS, the Company's Board of Directors has determined that it is in
     the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to authorize the
     issuance of additional shares of Common Stock under the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     1.  Amendment to Article I, Section IV.A.  Section IV.A. of Article I of
         -------------------------------------
the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced to read in its entirety as follows:

          A.  The stock issuable under the Plan shall be shares of the Company's
          authorized but unissued or reacquired Common Stock.  The aggregate
          number of shares which may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed
          30,000,000 shares.  The total number of shares issuable under the Plan
          shall be subject to adjustment from time to time in accordance with
          the provisions of this Section IV of Article One.
<PAGE>

     I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment to the Plan was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of drkoop.com, Inc., effective as of November 1, 2000.

     Executed on this 1st day of November, 2000.


                                        /s/ Stephen Plutsky
                                        ----------------------------
                                                 Secretary

                                       2
EXHIBIT 99.2





                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

The undersigned hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial conditions and results of operations of the Summus, Inc. (USA).


Date:       March 31, 2003
                                                 /s/ Robert S. Lowrey
                                                -------------------------------
                                                 Robert S. Lowrey
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December
      31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by LaserLock
      Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Normal
      A. Gardner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





August
              15,
              2006By:
            /s/ Norman
              GardnerNorman
              A. GardnerChief
                Executive Officer
              Chief
                Financial Officer







This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not , except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Explanatory
      Note: The same individual serves as chief executive (principal) officer and
      principal financial officer. Accordingly, there are no other individuals who
      are
“other certifying officers” referred to in this certification.
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Calif Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for theperiod ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)				or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
-  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all				material respects, the financial condition and results of				operations of the Company.

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                           

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief AccountingOfficer

February 7, 2005