Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Notices 25863

1Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company’s and

Distrigas of Massachusetts Corporation’s

applications were filed with the Commission under

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of

the Commission’s regulations.

Comment date: May 30, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

27. Duke Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–1755–000]

Take notice that on May 8, 1996, Duke

Power Company (Duke), tendered for

filing a Schedule MR Transaction Sheet

under Service Agreement No. 3 of

Duke’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original

Volume No. 3.

Comment date: May 30, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

28. Duke Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–1756–000]

Take notice that on May 8, 1996, Duke

Power Company (Duke), tendered for

filing a Schedule MR Transaction Sheet

supplementing the Service Agreement

for Market Rate (Schedule MR) Sales

between Duke and Entergy Services, Inc.

under Duke’s FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 3.

Comment date: May 30, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

29. Duke Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–1757–000]

Take notice that on May 8, 1996, Duke

Power Company (Duke), tendered for

filing a Service Agreement for Market

Rate (Schedule MR) Sales between Duke

and LG&E Power Marketing Inc. and a

Schedule MR Transaction Sheet

thereunder.

Comment date: May 30, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

30. Duke Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–1758–000]

Take notice that on May 8, 1996, Duke

Power Company (Duke), tendered for

filing a Schedule MR Transaction

Agreement and Transaction Sheet under

Service Agreement No. 4 of Duke’s

FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume

No. 3.

Comment date: May 30, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

31. NRG Generating (Parlin)

Cogeneration Inc.

[Docket No. ES96–27–000]

Take notice that on May 9, 1996, NRG

Generation (Parlin) Cogeneration Inc.

filed an application, under § 204 of the

Federal Power Act, seeking

authorization to issue a term note in an

aggregate principal amount not to

exceed $155 million and debt service

line of credit notes in an aggregate

principal amount not to exceed $5

million at any one time outstanding.

The final maturity would be fifteen (15)

years from the date of initial issuance of

the term note.

Comment date: June 4, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12923 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project No. 1951–036]

Georgia Power Company; Notice of

Availability of Environmental

Assessment

May 17, 1996.

An environmental assessment (EA) is

available for public review. The EA is

for an application to grant a permit to

Mr. Peter Lenzenhuber for dredging at

the Sinclair Project, FERC No. 1951. The

project is located on Lake Sinclair in

Putnam County, Georgia. The primary

purpose of the dredging would be to

increase recreational access to a

proposed subdivision, Edgewater Point

Estates.

The EA was written by staff in the

Office of Hydropower Licensing,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Copies of the EA can be viewed at the

Commission’s Reference and

Information Center, Room 2A, 888 First

Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426.

Copies can also be obtained by calling

the project manager, Heather Campbell

at (202) 219–3097.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12911 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. CP96–164–000 and CP96–254–

000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and

Distrigas of Massachusetts

Corporation; Notice of Intent To

Prepare an Environmental Assessment

for the Proposed Tennessee Domac

Projects; Request for Comments on

Environmental Issues, and Notice of

Public Scoping Meeting

May 17, 1996.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) will prepare an

environmental assessment (EA) that will

discuss the environmental impacts of

the construction and operation of the

facilities proposed in the Tennessee

DOMAC Projects.1 This EA will be used

by the Commission in its decisionmaking process to determine whether an

environmental impact statement is

necessary and whether to approve the

projects.

Summary of the Proposed Projects

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee) wants to expand the

capacity of its existing facilities to

transport up to 90,000 dekatherms of

natural gas per day on a firm basis for

Distrigas of Massachusetts Corporation

(DOMAC). Tennessee requests

Commission authorization, in Docket

No. CP96–164–000, to construct,

operate, and abandon upon the

termination of Tennessee’s contractual

obligations to DOMAC, the following

facilities needed to transport those

volumes:

• 7.56 miles of 20-inch-diameter

natural gas pipeline in Saugus, Revere,

Malden, and Everett, Massachusetts;

• One valve station at the northern

end of the proposed pipeline in Saugus,

Massachusetts; and

• A new meter station and

odorization system at the southern end

of the proposed pipeline at DOMAC’s

existing liquefied natural gas (LNG)

facility in Everett, Massachusetts.

DOMAC wants to construct additional

facilities at its LNG facility in Everett,

Massachusetts to increase reliability and

meet the anticipated need for increased

vaporization capacity. DOMAC requests

Commission authorization, in Docket

No. CP96–254–000, to construct and

operate the following facilities:

• Two vaporization trains, each with

a nominal capacity rating of 75 million

cubic feet per day;