alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Paul J. Kane, certify that: 

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

 

 (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 30, 2008

 

/s/ Paul J. Kane______________________

 

Paul J. Kane

Chief Financial Officer

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Troy Jack Briggs,

Petitioner,

v. 

David Shinn,

Respondent.

No. CV-18-00031-TUC-RM (EJM)

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Troy Jack Briggs filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 on January 22, 2018. (Doc. 1). Respondent filed an Answer on April 12, 

2018 (Doc. 12), and Petitioner filed a Reply on June 4, 2018 (Doc. 18). 

On July 6, 2020, the Court received notice that an Order mailed to Petitioner was 

returned as undeliverable because Petitioner is no longer in custody. (Doc. 21). A search 

by the Court of the Arizona Department of Corrections Inmate Locator confirms that 

Petitioner is no longer in custody and was released on October 21, 2019.

Pursuant to the Court’s Service Order (Doc. 4), failure to comply with the Order, 

including failure to notify the Court of a change of address, may result in dismissal of this 

action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260–61 (9th Cir. 

1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with an order of the 

Court).

Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge hereby RECOMMENDS that the District Court 

dismiss this action for failure to prosecute (LRCiv 41.1), failure to notify the Court of 

Case 4:18-cv-00031-RM Document 22 Filed 07/10/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

address change (LRCiv 83.3), and failure to comply with an Order of the Court (See Ferdik, 

963 F.2d at 1260–61). 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), any party may serve and file written objections 

within fourteen days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. 

A party may respond to another party’s objections within fourteen days after being served 

with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No reply to any response shall be filed. See id. 

If objections are not timely filed, then the parties’ rights to de novo review by the District 

Court may be deemed waived. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th 

Cir. 2003) (en banc).

Dated this 9th day of July, 2020.

Case 4:18-cv-00031-RM Document 22 Filed 07/10/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-24 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-24 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-24 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-24 Filed 10/09/18 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-24 Filed 10/09/18 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-24 Filed 10/09/18 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-24 Filed 10/09/18 Page 7 of 7
Amendment to 1998 Incentive Plan Dated December 15, 2000


     The Lennox  International  Inc. 1998 Incentive Plan, as amended,  is hereby
amended to delete Paragraph 5 of the Plan, in its entirety,  and replace it with
the following:

     "5.  Common  Stock  Available  for  Awards.  Subject to the  provisions  of
paragraph 15 hereof, there shall be available for Awards under this Plan granted
wholly or  partly  in Common  Stock  (including  rights or  options  that may be
exercised  for or settled in Common  Stock) an aggregate of 7,541,635  shares of
Common  Stock,  of which an aggregate  of not more than 660,000  shares shall be
available for Director  Awards and the remainder shall be available for Employee
Awards and Independent  Contractor  Awards. The number of shares of Common Stock
that  are the  subject  of  Awards  under  this  Plan,  that  are  forfeited  or
terminated,  expire unexercised,  are settled in cash in lieu of Common Stock or
in a manner  such  that all or some of the  shares  covered  by an Award are not
issued to a Participant  or are exchanged for Awards that do not involve  Common
Stock,  shall again  immediately  become  available  for Awards  hereunder.  The
Committee may from time to time adopt and observe such procedures concerning the
counting of shares  against  the Plan  maximum as it may deem  appropriate.  The
Board and the  appropriate  officers of the Company shall from time to time take
whatever actions are necessary to file any required  documents with governmental
authorities,  stock exchanges and transaction  reporting  systems to ensure that
shares of Common Stock are available for issuance pursuant to Awards."
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28861-28862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14193]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP89-224-017]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Refund Report

May 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 28, 1996, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing a Refund Report made pursuant to the 
Commission's Order dated April 11, 1996 in the above dockets.
    Southern states that the refund report summarizes the GSR refunds 
made to its consenting customers on February 29, 1996 and April 19, 
1996 and the transportation credit refunds made to its consenting 
customers on April 26, 1996. Southern states that the GSR refunds were 
made on February 29, 1996, to consenting customers who made the 
election to receive their refunds before the issuance of the 
Commission's rehearing order on April 11, 1996. Southern states that 
all other GSR refunds were made on April 19, 1996.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be

[[Page 28862]]

filed on or before June 7, 1996. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-14193 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**CERTIFICATIONS**




**EXHIBIT
      31.1/31.2**






I,
      Clifford Chapman, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International Cellular
      Accessories.





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have;




(a) 
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b) 
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) 
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly
      report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  I
      have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):




(a) 
      All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b) Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
                August 17,
                2006
            By:
            /s/ Clifford
              ChapmanClifford
              ChapmanPrincipal
              Executive and Financial
              Officer
Case 2:17-mj-00563-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00563-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00563-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00563-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Avicena Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/    Belinda Tsao NivaggioliName:

Belinda Tsao NivaggioliTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

December 29, 2005




/s/    D. Wayne PetersName:

D. Wayne PetersTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

December 29, 2005




This
certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
H. Res. 6 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 14, 2009. 

Whereas coaches are a vital part of organized youth sports; 

Whereas approximately 42 million American children participate in organized sports each year, but more than 20 

million children in the United States lack the opportunity 

to participate in organized sports, in part because of an 

insufficient number of coaches; 

Whereas a national effort to promote coaching is needed to 

increase the number of adults serving as coaches in youth 

sports; 

Whereas the purpose of the Congressional Caucus on Youth 

Sports is to educate Members of Congress, the media, 

and the public on the need to restore a child-centered 

focus in youth sports that will produce immeasurable 

positive benefits for the well-being and character development of children; 

Whereas sports and coaches help children fight obesity, increase their self-esteem, learn leadership skills, and discover how to incorporate the values of sports into other 

aspects of their daily lives; 

Whereas youth sports activity can reduce gang participation 

and youth violence; 
2 

•HRES 6 EH 

Whereas children need adults who will believe in them and 

who give children the support they need to be a success; 

Whereas coaches can positively impact the physical, emotional, and educational life of children; 

Whereas coaches who volunteer their time help educate children, serve as role models, and, in some situations, are 

parental surrogates; and 

Whereas the designation of the week of September 13 

through 19, 2009, as National Coach Appreciation Week 

would raise awareness and leverage resources to engage 

millions of children in organized sports that promote 

health, nutrition, and fitness, as well as other youth development outcomes: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the significant contribution coaches 

make in the life of children who participate in organized 

sports; 

(2) supports the goals and ideals of National Coach 

Appreciation Week; and 

(3) encourages the people of the United States to 

observe National Coach Appreciation Week with appropriate recognition, activities, and programs to dem-
3 

•HRES 6 EH 

onstrate the importance of sports and coaches in the life 

of children. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

2

a

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

l1

t2

13

t4

15

t6

t7

l8

l9

20

2l

22

L)

24

25

26

LAW OF}-ICE OF ROGER W. FRAZIER

Roeer W. Frazier

2515 East Broadwav Blvd.. Suite 200

Tucson, ArtzonaSs?16

Tel: (520) 882-4294

Fax: (520) 882-2853

Arrz.Bar No.012146

r o ger @,fr azierlaw az. c o m

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATED DIS'TRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Juell, a married individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

Marin Management Inc., dlbla DoubleTree by

Hilton Tucson - Reid Park, a foreign corporatiorn;

Marin Management Culver City. Inc.. a foreign

corporation,

PERSON TO BE EXAMINED:

DATE A]..ID TIME:

LOCATION:

ase No. 4: I 8-cv-00038-TUC-FRZ

OTICE OF TELEPHONIC

EPOSITION OF DAN

ORVILLE

Defendants.

YOrU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 30. a deposition

will be tak.en upon oral examination of the persc)n whose name is stated below, at the

time and prlace below, before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths, and

recorded try a certified court reporter.

Dan I\[orville

January 25,2019 at 2:00 p.m. (Telephonic)

Centext Legal Services

15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200

Shernran Oaks. CA 91403

Notice of Deoor;ition Dan Norville I

Case 4:18-cv-00038-FRZ Document 48 Filed 01/07/19 Page 1 of 2
I

2

.)

J

4

5

6

8

9

l0

ll

t2

13

l4

l5

16

l7

l8

l9

20

2l

22

23

24

25

26

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 7th dAY Pf JANUAry,2OI9.

LAW OFFICE OF ROGER W. F

By: /si Roger W. Frazier

Rogqr W. Frazier

Attofney for Plaintiff

Copy to Defendants' counsel this 7th

day of January, 20189, as CM/ECF

registrants, to:

Jodi L. Mullis

Arizona Bar No. 024044

ilmullis@wshblaw.com

Christopher M. Brown

Arizona No. 034091

cbrown@wshblaw.com

Wood, Smith, Henning &

2525F,. Camelback Road,

Phoenix, AZ 85016

Attorneys for Defendants

By: lslRoger W. Frazier

Berman LLP

Suite 450

Notice of Deposition - Dan Norville z

Case 4:18-cv-00038-FRZ Document 48 Filed 01/07/19 Page 2 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Nick Fisher, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

One Way Funding LLC, 

Defendant. 

NO. CV-18-00309-PHX-DLR

CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT 

 Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and upon 

application by the Plaintiff, default is hereby entered against Defendant OneWay Funding 

LLC. 

DEFAULT ENTERED this 6th day of April, 2018. 

 

 Brian D. Karth 

 District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

April 6, 2018 

 s/ D. Draper

 By Deputy Clerk 

 

Case 2:18-cv-00309-DLR Document 14 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.107
 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TOTO THE DYNEGY INC. MASTER RETIREMENT TRUST
 th
       I.
  THIS AGREEMENT th DYNEGY INC THE
NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY DYNEGY
INC. MASTER RETIREMENT TRUST




---



##### 



II.
   III.
   [Remainder of page intentionally left blank]




---



##### 



Dynegy Inc., an Illinois corporationBy:

/s/
[ILLEGIBLE]Title:
    Executive Vice President, AdministrationDate:
    April 2, 2007The Northern Trust CompanyBy:

/s/
[ILLEGIBLE]Title:
    Second Vice PresidentDate:

    April 2, 2007Agreed and accepted:
Dynegy Inc., a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/
[ILLEGIBLE]Title:
    Executive Vice President, AdministrationDate:
    April 2, 2007
#### Sadie Davis, Plaintiff, *v.*Ila Hairdressers, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

March 16, 1956.

*81
      *John W. Trapp*for Ila Hairdressers, Inc., defendant.

*Julius S. Christensen*for Dorosy, Inc., defendant.

*Jay Leo Rothschild*for plaintiff.

Jambs B. M. McNally, J.

This is a motion by the defendant, Ila Hairdressers, Inc., to retax the bill of costs and to modify the judgment so as to eliminate costs. The plaintiff recovered the sum of $3,000 in an action against the defendants. The moving-papers allege that both defendants are domestic corporations, having their principal place of business in the city of New York; that since plaintiff has recovered the sum of $3,000 in an action in this court she is not entitled to recover costs.

The plaintiff in opposition to the motion states that jurisdiction could not be obtained over the defendants and therefore she was obliged to serve the Secretary of State in the city of Albany. It is because of this fact that the plaintiff claims she is entitled to tax costs. Under either subdivision (A) or subdivision (B) of section 24 of the Stock Corporation Law, the Secretary of State is the agent of a corporation ‘ *‘*upon whom process in any action or proceeding against it may be served ”. The last sentence of section 25 of the Stock Corporation Law reads: “If the action or proceeding is instituted in a court of limited jurisdiction, service of process may be made in the manner provided in this section if the * * * office of the defendant corporation * * * is within such territorial jurisdiction.” Plaintiff therefore could have served the Secretary of State if the present action had been in the City Court. That the plaintiff could have obtained jurisdiction in the City Court is further indicated by the decision in *Less*v. *11 West 42nd St., Inc.*(274 App. Div. 932) which reads as follows: “ The action is in the City Court of the City of New York, County of Kings. The defendant is a domestic corporation with offices within the city of New York, and the cause of action accrued there. The summons and complaint were delivered in Albany to the Secretary of State, as agent of the defendant corporation, *82as provided in section 25 of the Stock Corporation Law. Order of the Appellate Term affirming the order of the City Court which denies the defendant’s motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. *(Pohlers*v. *Exeter Mfg. Co.,*293 N. Y. 274.) ”

The plaintiff having, instituted the action in this court and recovered less than the statutory amount is therefore not entitled to the taxation of costs. The plaintiff’s argument based on the dissolution of Dorosy, Inc., on December 23, 1952, is untenable in view of the fact that service was made on said defendant on April 22, 1952. (See affidavit of Leonard H. Bernstein sworn to February 16, 1956.) The motion is granted. Settle order.