alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Metrics Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
Gehorsam, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
February
14, 2011





/s/ Robert
      GehorsamRobert
      GehorsamChief
      Executive OfficerImage
      Metrics Inc.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

 Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is granted; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stephanie Johnstun’s bad faith and 

punitive damages claims are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own 

costs and attorneys’ fees; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Stephanie Johnstun is the sole remaining 

Plaintiff and her sole remaining claim is for breach of contract. 

 Dated this 5th day of July, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

Calvin Johnstun, et al., 

 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

USAA Casualty Insurance Company, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-17-04641-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

Case 2:17-cv-04641-SPL Document 27 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.75

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR WAFER SUPPLY

Whereas Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. (CSI) wishes to purchase wafers from Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. (Oki), and Oki wishes to supply wafers to CSI, the two parties enter this agreement as of July 6, 2000.

Definitions:

Wafers:  [*].

Understanding

For the 12 month period from September 1, 2000 through August 31, 2001, CSI agrees to place orders with Oki and Oki agrees to deliver the wafer quantities as stated below:

          [*]:          [*]

          [*]:          [*]

The price of wafers for the period from September 1, 2000 through August 31, 2001 shall be determined as follows:

          [*]:          $[*]

          [*]:          $[*]

In case there is any deviation from the [*] delivery schedule, [*].

	CATALYST SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.


	 	   	OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY, CO. LTD.



	/s/  Hideyuki Tanigami	 	   	/s/  Hisao Baba
	
	 	  	

	Name:  Hideyuki Tanigami
Title:    Chairman of the Board	 	   	Name:  Hisao Baba
Title:    Vice President & General Manager Marketing & Sales Dev., SiSC



	


	 	  	 



	22 September 2000	 	  	September 22, 2000
	
	 	  	

	Date	 	  	Date



	 	[*]	 	Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
Exhibit 32.2

                          INTERIM CAPITAL CORPORATION.
                 FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Lindberg, certify that

     4.   I am the Chief Financial Officer of Interim Capital Corporation.
     5.   Attached  to this  certification  is Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended
          March 31, 2006, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the
          issuer with the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  pursuant to Section
          13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act of 1934  (the
          "Exchange Act"), which contains financial statements.
     6.   I hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
          o    The periodic  report  containing the financial  statements  fully
               complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Exchange Act, and
          o    The  information in the periodic report fairly  presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the issuer for the periods presented.


May 11, 2006                                              /s/ Mark Lindberg
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Mark Lindberg
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by Interim Capital  Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This  certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document  with which it is submitted to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

 

I, Kevin R. Hoben,, certify that: 

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, of Omega Flex, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

 (c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  June 30, 2007 

 

/s/ Kevin R. Hoben__________________________

 

Kevin R. Hoben

Chief Executive Officer

 

|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                  CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corporate Property Associates 14
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John J. Park, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/  John J. Park
     ---------------------------

     John J. Park
     Chief Financial Officer
           3/25/03
     -----------------
     Date
EXHIBIT 32.1/32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cellular Accessories (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford Chapman, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|      |                   |  |     |                                                       
|----- | ----------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------
|      |                   |  |     |                                                       
|Date: | November 13, 2009 |  | By: | /s/ CLIFFORDCHAPMAN                                   
|      |                   |  |     | Clifford Chapman
Chief Executive and Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4436

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SABU ABDUL JAUHARI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (4:08-cr-00055-RGD-TEM-1)

Submitted: August 27, 2010 Decided: September 10, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Frances H. 

Pratt, Keith Loren Kimball, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, 

Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United 

States Attorney, Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Gary G. Grindler, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Lanny A. Breuer, Assistant Attorney 

General, J. Cam Barker, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sabu Abdul Jauhari pled guilty to being a felon in 

possession a weapon and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 922(g), 924(a)(2) (2006) and was sentenced to sixty months of 

imprisonment. On appeal, Jauhari contends that his sentence was 

improperly enhanced, under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

(“USSG”) § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (2008), because his prior Virginia 

conviction for larceny from a person did not qualify as a 

violent felony. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Jauhari argues that this court’s opinion in United 

States v. Smith, 359 F.3d 662 (4th Cir. 2004), finding that the 

Virginia offense of larceny from a person was a violent felony 

for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, is no longer good 

law following the Supreme Court’s opinions in Chambers v. United 

States, 555 U.S. __, 129 S. Ct. 687 (2009), and Begay v. United 

States, 128 S. Ct. 1581 (2008).∗

Jauhari’s argument, however, is foreclosed by our 

recent opinion in United States v. Jarmon, 596 F.3d 228 (4th 

Cir. 2010), petition for cert. filed, __ U.S.L.W. __ (U.S. May 

 

 ∗ Because the language defining a violent felony in 18 

U.S.C. § 924(e) is nearly identical to the language defining a 

crime of violence in USSG § 4B1.2(a), this court looks to its 

case law interpreting both provisions when examining whether a 

prior crime involves conduct that presents a serious risk of 

physical injury to another. United States v. Rivers, 595 F.3d 

558, 560 n.1 (4th Cir. 2010).
3

25, 2010) (No. 09-11134). In Jarmon, we reaffirmed our opinion 

in Smith and found that larceny from a person, under North 

Carolina law, is a crime of violence within the meaning of USSG 

§ 4B1.2(a)(2). 596 F.3d at 232-33. Accordingly, we affirm

Jauhari’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of DataMill Media Corp. (f/k/a/Smitten
Press: Local Lore and Legends, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Beatty, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: May 16, 2011


/s/ Vincent Beatty
------------------------------------------
Vincent Beatty
Director acting as Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Randy FULCHER, Employee/Appellant, v. ACE SCRAP METALS, Employer/Respondent, and Transportation Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent.

No. 68736.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 16, 1996.

Richard A. Faulstich, Alvin Wolff, Jr. & Associates, St. Louis, for appellant.

Carl Kessinger, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondents.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Robert Amsler, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for Second Injury Fund.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) award denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. The Commission affirmed and incorporated by reference the award of an Administrative Law Judge denying compensation. We affirm. The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Each of the undersigned officers of American CareSource Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies that:

 

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three month period ending June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   |            |   |   |                                                                |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | August 14, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Edward B. Berger                                                |
|   |            |   |   | Executive Chairman of the Board                                     |
|   |            |   |   |                                                                |
| Date:  | August 14, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ David S. Boone                                                  |
|   |            |   |   | David S. Boone

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |            |   |   |                                                                |
| Date:  | August 14, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Steven M. Phillips                                              |
|   |            |   |   | Steven M. Phillips

Controller and Principal

Accounting Officer    |
|   |            |   |   |                                                                |

 

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the Matter of: TERESA JEAN MOORE; 

JENNIFER LAUREN MOORE, 

Debtors.

------------------------------

TERESA JEAN MOORE; JENNIFER 

LAUREN MOORE, 

Appellants, 

 v. 

JOHN NELSO SPADARO; et al., 

Appellees.

No. 18-16818 

D.C. No. 5:17-cv-03760-EJD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 14, 2020**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 22 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-16818 

Chapter 13 debtors Teresa Jean Moore and Jennifer Lauren Moore appeal 

pro se from the district court’s order dismissing their bankruptcy appeal for failure 

to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We 

review for an abuse of discretion. Moneymaker v. CoBen (In re Eisen), 31 F.3d 

1447, 1451 (9th Cir. 1994). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing appellants’

appeal for failure to prosecute or by denying appellants further time to oppose 

defendant Kay’s motion to dismiss, after it previously provided them numerous

extensions of time to perfect their appeal and opportunities to respond to the orders

to show cause. See id. at 1451-56 (discussing factors for district court to weigh in 

determining whether to dismiss for failure to prosecute; noting that dismissal 

should not be disturbed unless there is a definite and firm conviction that the court 

below committed a clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached upon a 

weighing of the relevant factors); Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 

604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court has broad discretion to manage its docket).

Because we affirm the district court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute, we 

do not consider appellants’ challenges to the bankruptcy court’s orders or judgment

in the underlying adversary proceeding. 
3 18-16818 

Appellants’ motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 19) is denied as 

unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.