2536 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 1996 / Notices

modifications issued, must be made a

part of every contract for performance of

the described work within the

geographic area indicated as required by

an applicable Federal prevailing wage

law and 29 CFR Part 5. The wage rates

and fringe benefits, notice of which is

published herein, and which are

contained in the Government Printing

Office (GPO) document entitled

‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued

Under The Davis-Bacon And Related

Acts,’’ shall be the minimum paid by

contractors and subcontractors to

laborers and mechanics.

Any person, organization, or

governmental agency having an interest

in the rates determined as prevailing is

encouraged to submit wage rate and

fringe benefit information for

consideration by the Department.

Further information and selfexplanatory forms for the purpose of

submitting this data may be obtained by

writing to the U.S. Department of Labor,

Employment Standards Administration,

Wage and Hour Division, Division of

Wage Determinations, 200 Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Room S–3014,

Washington, D.C. 20210.

New General Wage Determination

Decisions

The number of the decisions added to

the Government Printing Office

document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under the DavisBacon and related Acts’’ are listed by

Volume and State.

Volume III

Georgia

GA950085 (Jan. 26, 1996)

GA950086 (Jan. 26, 1996)

GA950087 (Jan. 26, 1996)

GA950088 (Jan. 26, 1996)

Modifications to General Wage

Determination Decisions

The number of decisions listed in the

Government Printing Office document

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations

Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and

Related Acts’’ being modified are listed

by Volume and State. Dates of

publication in the Federal Register are

in parentheses following the decisions

being modified.

Volume I

New Jersey

NJ950002 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume II

Virginia

VA950005 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950007 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950021 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950023 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950033 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950036 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950049 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950065 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950067 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950085 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950087 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950088 (Feb. 10, 1995)

VA950108 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume III

Alabama

AL950007 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950008 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950017 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950042 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950044 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950052 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Georgia

GA950003 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950022 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950065 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950073 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950084 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950085 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950086 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950087 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950088 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume IV

Illinois

IL950001 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950002 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950003 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950005 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950006 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950007 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950008 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950009 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950011 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950012 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950013 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950014 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950015 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950016 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950020 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950021 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950022 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950027 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950028 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950029 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950032 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950034 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950040 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950043 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950046 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950051 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950063 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950065 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950067 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950068 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950069 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950071 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950073 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950078 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950082 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950084 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950090 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950092 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950095 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950096 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950098 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume V

None

Volume VI

None

General Wage Determination

Publication

General wage determinations issued

under the Davis-Bacon and related Acts,

including those noted above, may be

found in the Government Printing Office

(GPO) document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under The DavisBacon and Related Acts’’. This

publication is available at each of the 50

Regional Government Depository

Libraries and many of the 1,400

Government Depository Libraries across

the country.

The general wage determinations

issued under the Davis-Bacon and

related Acts are available electronically

by subscription to the FedWorld

Bulletin Board System of the National

Technical Information Service (NTIS) of

the U.S. Department of Commerce at

(703) 487–4630.

Hard-copy subscriptions may be

purchased from: Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Printing

Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, (202)

512–1800.

When ordering hard-copy

subscription(s), be sure to specify the

State(s) of interest, since subscriptions

may be ordered for any or all of the six

separate volumes, arranged by State.

Subscriptions include an annual edition

(issued in January or February) which

includes all current general wage

determinations for the States covered by

each volume. Throughout the remainder

of the year, regular weekly updates are

distributed to subscribers.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of

January 1996.

Philip J. Gloss,

Chief, Branch of Construction Wage

Determinations.

[FR Doc. 96–958 Filed 1–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–27–M

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of December.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 1996 / Notices 2537

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA-W-31,489; Kenton Custom Molding

(A Div. of Ripley Industries, Inc),

Kenton, TN

TA-W-31,480; Meehan Tooker, East

Rutherford, NJ

TA-W-31,491; Henry Vogt Machine Co.,

Sapulpa, OK

TA-W-31,609; Empire Stamp & Seal Co.,

New York, NY

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA-W-31,576; BW/IP International, Inc.,

Bryon Jackson Pump Div., Fresno,

CA

TA-W-31,523; Wallace & Tlernan,

Belleville, NJ

TA-W-31,484; Compac Industries, North

Bergen, NJ

TA-W-31,616; Ozone Industries, Inc.,

Ozone Park, NY

TA-W-31,540; American Banknote Co.,

Bedford Park, IL

TA-W-31,527; M & M/Mars, Inc., Burr

Ridge, IL

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA-W-31,641; Sons Transportation,

Springfield, MA

TA-W-31,635; Distribution & Auto

Service, Inc., Seattle, WA

TA-W-31,606; Kerr-McGee Refining

Corp., Houston, TX

TA-W-31,551; Gleason Sales & Service,

Lansing, MI

TA-W-31,522; Transco Energy Co.,

Including Transcontinental Gas

Pipe Line Corp and Transco Gas

Marketing Co., Houston, TX

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-31,619; Destec Energy, Inc.,

Houston, TX

The investigation revealed that

criterion (2) and (3) have not been met.

Sales or production did not decline

during the relevant period as required

for certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or produciton.

TA-W-31,519; National Fiber

Technology (Formerly National

Hair Technology), Lawrence, MA

The investigation revealed that

criterion (1) and criterion (2) have not

been meet. A significant number or

proportion of the workers did not

become totally or partially separated as

required for certification. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location for each

determination references the impact

date for all workers for such

determination.

TA-W-31,559; Hettick International,

Harrisonville, MO: October 11,

1994.

TA-W-31,604; Fernbrook & Co., Plant

#3, Neffs, PA: October 23, 1994.

TA-W-31,586; Benton Fashions, Benton,

PA: October 17, 1994.

TA-W-31,594; Reservoirs, Inc., Midland,

TX: October 19, 1994. October 20,

1994.

TA-W-31,578; SCI Systems, Inc.,

(Formerly Digital Equipment Corp),

Augusta, ME: October 12, 1994.

TA-W-31,643; Inland Steel Co., East

Chicago, IN: November 7, 1994.

TA-W-31,499; General Electric Co., GETransmission Systems, Fort

Edward, NY: September 18, 1994.

TA–W–31,554 & A; Wondermaid, Inc.,

Washington, MO, MA & New York,

NY; October 4, 1994.

TA–W–31,585; FAD Manufacturing,

Inc., Swoyersville, PA; September

17, 1994.

TA–W–31,507; Howden Fan Co.,

Buffalo, NY; September 26, 1994.

TA–W–31,505; General Electro

Mechanical Corp., Buffalo, NY;

September 27, 1995.

TA–W–31,512; TAP Enterprises, Red

Oak, IA; October 1, 1994.

TA–W–31,600; Palm Beach Co.,

Eastaboga, AL; October 20, 1994.

TA–W–31,685; Lee Apparel Co., St.

Joseph, MO; November 6, 1994.

TA–W–31,541; Mud Systems, Inc.,

Wichita, KS; October 4, 1994.

TA–W–31,428; Shorewood Packaging

Corp., Pittsford, NY; September 5,

1995.

TA–W–31,663; J. Lamb, Inc., Engelwood,

NJ; November 14, 1994.

TA–W–31,657; Jos A. Bank, Carroll

Street, Hampstead, MD; November

13, 1994.

TA–W–31,496; PQ Corp., Butler, NJ;

September 15, 1994.

TA–W–31,614; Christian Fashions, El

Paso, TX; October 25, 1994.

TA–W–31,423 & A; Astor Knitting Mills,

Inc., Reading, PA & Astor

Industries, Inc., Reading, PA;

September 7, 1994.

TA–W–31,571; Carl E. Smith, Inc.,

Sandyville, WV; October 7, 1994.

TA–W–31,225 & A; Mason Shoe

Manufacturing Co., Chippewa Falls,

WI and F & F Shoe, Chippewa Falls,

WI; June 27, 1994.

TA–W–31,621; Aquatech, Inc., AKA

Greenwood Mills, East West

Apparel, El Paso, TX; October 23,

1994.

TA–W–31,513, TA–W–31,514, TA–W–

31,515, TA–W–31,516, TA–W–

31,517; Phillips-Van Heusen Co.,

Ozark, AL, Clayton, AL, Hartford,

AL, Opp, AL, Geneva, AL;

September 27, 1994.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of December,

1995.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,
2538 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 1996 / Notices

(3) That imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases in imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–00644; Shanklin Shasta

Landclearing Co., Klamath Falls,

OR

NAFTA–TAA–00658; Fernbrook and

Co., Plant #3, Neffs, PA

NAFTA–TAA–00661; Fruit of the Loom,

Greensburg, KY

NAFTA–TAA–00674; Wondermaid, Inc.,

Washington, MO

NAFTA–TAA–00695 & A; ColebrookTerry, Inc., Colebrook Plant,

Colebrook, PA & The York Plant,

York, PA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

NAFTA–TAA–00678; Sons

Transportation, Springfield, MA

The investigation revealed that the

workers of the subject firm do not

produce an article within the meaning

of Section 250(a) of the Trade Act, as

amended.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

NAFTA–TAA–00651; SCI Systems, Inc.,

(Formerly Digital Equipment Corp),

August, ME; October 12, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00665; American Meter

Co., Industrial Products Div., Erie,

PA; October 27, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00655; Pacific Power &

Light Co., Centralia Plant, Centralia,

WA; October 24, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00646; Pacific Power,

Casper, WY & Other Locations

Within Wyoming; October 16, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00680; Inland Steel Co.,

East Chicago, IN; November 7,

1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00639; Carl E. Smith,

Inc., Sandyville, WV; October 7,

1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00670; Bausch & Lomb

Personal Products Div., Tucker, GA;

October 31, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00643; Kenetech

Windpower, Portland, OR; October

10, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00667; Diesel Recon Co.,

Santa Fe Springs, CA; October 25,

1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00663; Selmet, Inc., Golf

Products Div., Albany, OR; October

23, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00671; Aquatech, Inc.,

A.K.A. Greenwood Mills/East-West

Apparel, El Paso, TX; October 30,

1994.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of December,

1995. Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal

business hours or will be mailed to

persons who write to the above address.

Dated: December 14, 1995.

Russell Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy &

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96–1377 Filed 1–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA-W–31,225, 225A, 225B, 225c]

Amended Certification Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company

Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin; F&F Shoe,

Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin; and the shoe

outlets of Mason Shoe Manufacturing

Company and F&F shoe operating in various

locations within: The State of Wisconsin and

the State of Minnesota

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on July

21, 1995, applicable to all workers of

Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company

and F&F Shoe, located in Chippewa

Falls, Wisconsin. The workers are

engaged in employment related to the

production of ladies’ and men’s shoes.

At the request of the State Agency, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of Mason Shoe and F&F

Shoe. New information received from

the State shows that workers at the

outlets of the subject firms operating in

various locations within the States of

Wisconsin and Minnesota have

experienced layoffs.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers of

Mason Shoe and F&F Shoe who were

adversely affected by increased imports.

The amended notice applicable to TAW–31,225 is hereby issued as follows:

‘‘All workers of Mason Shoe

Manufacturing Company, F&F Shoe,

Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, and at the

outlets of the subject firms operating in

various locations within the States of

Wisconsin and Minnesota who became

totally or partially separated from

employment on or after June 27, 1994 are

eligible to apply for adjustment assistance

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of

December 1995.

Russell T. Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy and

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96–1369 Filed 1–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,089; TA–W–30,089E]

Sara Lee Knit Products; Amended

Certification Regarding Eligibility To

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a Notice of

Certification Regarding Eligibility to

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance on August 26, 1994,

applicable to all workers of Sara Lee

Knit Products at plants in Martinsville,

Virginia. The certification was

subsequently amended to include Sara

Lee Knit Product workers at the subject

firm plants at various locations in,

Virginia and North Carolina. The

amended notices were issued September

16, 1994, February 25, 1995, and

September 19, 1995 and published in

the Federal Register on September 27,

1994 (59 FR 49257), March 10, 1995 (FR

60 13179), and October 2, 1995 (60 FR

51501), respectively.

At the request of the company, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. The

Department is again amending the

certification to cover the workers

separated from the Sara Lee Knit

Product production facility located in

Eastman, Georgia. The workers produce

T-shirts. The company reports that the

plant closed November 16, 1995.