alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 39 

Honoring the contributions of Catholic schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the contributions of Catholic schools. 

Whereas America’s Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior scholastic education; 

Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values in America’s young 

people; 

Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 

2007–2008 academic year was nearly 2,300,000 and the 

student-teacher ratio was 14 to 1; 

Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 39 IH 

Whereas more than 25 percent of school children enrolled in 

Catholic schools are from minority backgrounds, and over 

14 percent are non-Catholics; 

Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated 

to their faith, values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually stimulating environment rich in 

spiritual, character, and moral development; 

Whereas the Catholic high school graduation rate is 99 percent, with 80 percent of graduates attending four-year 

colleges and 17 percent attending two-year colleges or 

technical schools; 

Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic 

education, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops 

stated: ‘‘Education is one of the most important ways by 

which the Church fulfills its commitment to the dignity 

of the person and building of community. Community is 

central to education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently desired goal. The educational efforts 

of the Church, therefore, must be directed to forming 

persons-in-community; for the education of the individual 

Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, 

but also the destinies of the many communities in which 

he lives.’’; and 

Whereas January 25, 2009, to January 31, 2009, has been 

designated as Catholic Schools Week by the National 

Catholic Educational Association and the United States 

Conference of Catholic Bishops: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools 

3 Week, an event co-sponsored by the National Catho4 lic Educational Association and the United States 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 39 IH 

1 Conference of Catholic Bishops and established to 

2 recognize the vital contributions of America’s thou3 sands of Catholic elementary and secondary schools; 

4 and 

5 (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, 

6 parents, and teachers across the Nation for their on7 going contributions to education, and for the key 

8 role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, 

9 stronger future for this Nation. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 513 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 513

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 31, 2009.
Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers have suffered the supreme sacrifice of 
        motherhood by losing a son or daughter who served in the Armed Forces, 
        and thus perpetuate the memory of all whose lives are sacrificed in war;
Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers assist veterans of the Armed Forces and 
        their dependents in the presentation of claims to the Department of 
        Veterans Affairs and aid members of the Armed Forces who served and died 
        or were wounded or incapacitated during hostilities;
Whereas the services rendered to the United States by the mothers of America 
        have strengthened and inspired Americans throughout the history of the 
        United States;
Whereas Americans honor themselves and the mothers of America when they revere 
        and emphasize the role of the home and the family as the true 
        foundations of the United States;
Whereas by doing so much for the home, the American mother is a source of moral 
        and spiritual guidance for the people of the United States and thus acts 
        as a positive force to promote good government and peace among all 
        mankind; and
Whereas the last Sunday in September, which in 2009 is September 27, is observed 
        as Gold Star Mothers Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and purpose of Gold Star Mothers Day, which 
        is observed in remembrance of the supreme sacrifice made by mothers who 
        lose a son or daughter serving in the Armed Forces; and
            (2) urges the President to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
        people of the United States to observe Gold Star Mothers Day with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 3:18-cr-08000-DLR Document 1 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:18-cr-08000-DLR Document 1 Filed 01/02/18 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60445

Summary Calendar

Marco Antonio Mercado-Alvarez, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A098 895 650

Before Barksdale, Elrod, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Marco Antonio Mercado-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

was ordered removed in absentia in 2006. He petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the 

immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his 2018 motion to reopen his removal 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 3, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60445 Document: 00516418564 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2022
No. 21-60445

2

proceeding. Mercado contends the BIA erred by declining to consider 

whether he was entitled to equitable tolling of the statutory deadline for filing 

his motion because he did not present that issue to the IJ.

The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for obvious reasons 

“under a highly deferential abuse-of-discretion standard”. Singh v. Gonzales, 

436 F.3d 484, 487 (5th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). Under that standard, 

our court may not disturb the BIA’s decision unlessit is “capricious, without 

foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so irrational that it is arbitrary rather 

than the result of any perceptible rational approach”. Gomez-Palacios v. 

Holder, 560 F.3d 354, 358 (5th Cir. 2009). Questions of law are reviewed de 

novo; factual findings, for substantial evidence. Id. The IJ’s decision is 

considered only to the extent it influenced the BIA. Id. 

“This court has long held that the BIA need not consider an issue 

raised for the first time on appeal.” Cantarero-Lagos v. Barr, 924 F.3d 145, 

153 (5th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted). Mercado fails to show it was erroneous 

or otherwise irrational for the BIA to not consider his issue. See GomezPalacios, 560 F.3d at 358.

DENIED.

Case: 21-60445 Document: 00516418564 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2022
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CIFC Deerfield Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|                              |   | Date:   May 16, 2011 |
|-----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
| /s/   PETER GLEYSTEEN             |   |                      |
| Peter   Gleysteen                 |   |                      |
| Chief   Executive Officer         |   |                      |
| (Principal   Executive Officer)   |   |                      |
|                              |   |                      |
|                              |   | Date:   May 16, 2011 |
|                              |   |                      |
|                              |   |                      |
| /s/   KENNETH R. POSNER           |   |                      |
| Kenneth   R. Posner,              |   |                      |
| Interim   Chief Financial Officer |   |                      |
| (Principal   Financial Officer)   |   |                      |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MAJOR CREATIONS INCORPORATED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Stanley Major, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Stanley Major

Date: June 14, 2006                   Stanley Major

Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
Presidential Documents

26017

Federal Register

Vol. 61, No. 101

Thursday, May 23, 1996

Title 3—

The President

Memorandum of April 1, 1996

Delegation of Responsibilities Under Section 1208 of Title XII

of Public Law 104–106

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the

United States of America, including section 301 of Title 3 of the United

States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the authorities and

duties vested in the President under Section 1208 of Title XII of the National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106), to

be exercised in consultation with the Secretary of Defense.

Any reference in this memorandum to any Act or delegation of authority

shall be deemed to be a reference to such Act or delegation of authority

as amended from time to time.

The functions delegated by this memorandum may be redelegated within

the Department of State, as appropriate.

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register

œ–.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, April 1, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–12935

Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24287-24288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11936]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-122-815]


Pure and Alloy Magnesium from Canada; Extension of Time Limit for 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for countervailing duty 
administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for preliminary and final results of the third 
administrative review of the countervailing duty order on pure and 
alloy magnesium from Canada. This extension is made pursuant to the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act 
(hereinafter, ``the Act'').

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 14, 1996

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Thirumalai or Kristie 
Strecker, Office of Countervailing Investigations, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and

[[Page 24288]]

Constitution Avenue NW. Washington, D.C., 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4087 or 3174 respectively.

POSTPONEMENT: Under the Act, the Department may extend the deadline for 
completion of an administrative review if it determines that it is not 
practicable to complete the review within the statutory time limit of 
365 days. The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete 
the third administrative review of pure and alloy magnesium from Canada 
within this time limit.
    In accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 
will extend the time for completion of the preliminary results of this 
review from a 245-day period to no later than a 365-day period and for 
completion of the final results of this review from a 120-day period to 
no later than a 180-day period.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
Barbara R. Stafford,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Investigations.
[FR Doc. 96-11936 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-138742) pertaining to the Learning Ventures, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, the Capella Education Company 1999 Stock Option Plan, and the Capella Education Company 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports datedFebruary 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Capella Education Company, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Capella Education Company, included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

March 5, 2008
The Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate

1

Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred

for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

___________

No. 95-3914

___________

James J. Hanrahan, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Housing and Redevelopment * District of Minnesota.

Authority of Duluth, MN; *

Richard W. Ball, Executive * [UNPUBLISHED]

Director of HRA of Duluth, MN, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 23, 1996

 Filed: May 31, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges

___________

PER CURIAM.

James J. Hanrahan appeals from the District Court's grant of summary 1

judgment to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. Having

carefully reviewed the entire record and the parties' submissions, we

reject as unsubstantiated Hanrahan's claim of judicial bias, and we affirm

for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's opinion. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended October 16, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald D. Breen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: November 21, 2007 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Montana Mining Corp. (Registrant) for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ruairidh Campbell, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 24, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. MASONIC HOME OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

No. 69228.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

June 28, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 1,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 17,1996.

Lonnie Snelling, University City, pro se.

Kathi Lynne Chestnut, Evans and Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling, appellant, appeals the denial of his motion to set aside judgment pursuant to Rule 74.06(b)(1). On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion because: 1) the trial court had jurisdiction to rule on the motion; and 2) he was denied his constitutional rights in that his motion was denied without a hearing. Appeal dismissed.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that the trial court did not have jurisdiction over appellant’s motions to set aside judgment pursuant to Rule 74.06(b)(1). We further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
<FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION STAMP APPEARS HERE>


                FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION

    PRIVATE OPERATIONAL FIXED MICROWAVE RADIO STATION LICENSE


LICENSEE

GLOBAL PACIFIC INTERNET
770 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH, STE 3400
ORANGE, CA 92868

ASSOCIATED BROADCAST STATION

FILE NUMBER    748654

CALL SIGN      WPOT648

RADIO SERVICE
MW INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS

STATION CLASS
FIXED

EFFECTIVE DATE
07/07/1999

CONSTRUCTION DATE
01/07/2001

EXPIRATION DATE
07/07/2009

SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF GRANT: NONE

                                SITES

TRANSMITTER STREET ADDRESS      COUNTY            CITY        ST
72 E. CORPORATE PKWY            ORANGE            IRVINE      CA


SITE NO.      LATITUDE          LONGITUDE         DATUM       ELEVATION (FT)
001           33-41-31.1 N      117-49-21-.4 W    N27          82
002           33-40-46.7 N      117-50-17.2 W     N27         Receiver Site

TIP HEIGHT (FT)          ANTENNA PAINTING & LIGHTING CODES
115                      FCC FORM 715/715A


                         FREQUENCY PATHS

FREQUENCY AND POWER INFORMATION                     PATH
FREQUENCY        TOLERANCE      EMISSION            EIRP
(MHZ)            (%)            DESIGNATOR          (DBM)
OR CHANNEL
023325.000000    0.00010        50MOD7W             57.1


                               SEGMENT INFORMATION

SEG          EMIT    ANT     BEAM-      HTxWD POL   AZIM     RECEIVER
NO           SITE    HGT     WIDTH      (FT)        (DEG)    SITE CALL SIGN
             NO      (FT)    (DEG)                           NO
1            001     111     1.6            H       226.4      002  WPOT649
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Blake Sanders, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-18-0003-PHX-DLR

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk or danger to any other person or to the community pursuant

to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure his appearance at future proceedings.

The Court also concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a

danger and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure

the safety of the community.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 28th day of December, 2018