alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Seifi Ghasemi, certifythat:

1.            I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RockwoodHoldings, Inc.;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.            The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.            The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 14, 2006                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ SEIFI  GHASEMI                    |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                         |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofVenoco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby certify thatthe report on Form 10-Q/A (the “Report”) of the Issuer for thequarter ended March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Issuer.
| /s/ TIMOTHY  M. MARQUEZ                |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy M. Marquez                     |
| *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman* |
| November 21, 2005                 |
| /s/ DAVID B. CHRISTOFFERSON            |   |
| David B. Christofferson                |
| *Chief Financial Officer*              |
| November 21, 2005                 |

 

----
#### Donald W. RIPLEY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. VALLEY R-6 SCHOOL DISTRICT and Cal Tiefenauer, Defendant/Appellants.

No. 66671.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 26, 1995.

David Knieriem, St. Louis, for appellants.

Albert J. Tindall, Potosí, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., and SIMON and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Valley R-6 School District and Cal Tiefe-nauer appeal from a judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of Washington County finding that Tiefenauer failed to exercise the *648highest degree of care and awarding Donald Ripley $15,000 in property damages.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b), and deny Respondent’s request for attorney fees for frivolous appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eric HARRIEL, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 68895.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 21, 1996.

Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Cheryl A. Gaponegro, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J. and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury of one count of criminal nonsupport, § 568.040, RSMo Supp.1993. The court sentenced him in accordance with the jury’s assessment to ninety days in county jail. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
#### Janet Jane BRANSON, Petitioner-Respondent, v. John Robert BRANSON, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 56803.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division 1.

July 17, 1990.

David B. Tobben, Washington, for respondent-appellant.

David L. Baylord, Union, for petitioner-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from those portions of a dissolution decree relating to the distribution of marital property and the award of attorney fees to wife. We affirm. The decree is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Sipple *et al. v.*Seaboard Air-Line Railway Company.

No. 3020.

October 10, 1922.

Certiorari; from Court of Appeals. 28 *Ga. App.*16.

Mclntire, *Walsh & Bernstein,*for plaintiffs.

Anderson, *Gann &*Gann, for defendant.

Hill, J.

1. When goods arc delivered to a carrier for transportation, it is the duty of the carrier to safely transport and deliver them to the point of destination. If the goods are damaged in transit, but still remain of substantial value, the consignee can not reject the goods, but must receive them, and may, if damaged negligently, sue and recover from the carrier for any damage sustained. If, however, the goods are so damaged as to be worthless, or are useless for the purpose for which they are intended, then the consignee can reject and refuse to receive them, and hold the carrier liable for their value. *Wilensky*v. *Central Ry. Co.,*136 *Ga.*889, 894 (72 S. E. 418, Ann. Cas. 1912 D, 271).

2. Under the circumstances stated in the foregoing note, it would be competent for the consignee and the carrier to enter into a contract by which the latter was to carry, without compensation, such goods from the point of destination, where there were no facilities for' repairing them, back to the point of shipment, so that the shipper could have the damage properly repaired and thus lessen the damage to the carrier; and under such circumstances this contract would not be in contravention of public policy as declared by the Civil Code (1910), § 2629, and by the rules of the Railroad Commission, which forbid any railroad corporation fromi making any unjust discrimination in its rates or charges of toll, or in compensation for the transportation of passengers or freights of any description; and would not be an unjust discrimination so as to render the contract void. Such a contract, made by the claim agent of the carriel-, whose duty it is to adjust claims for damages sustained by shipment, and ratified by the carrier in returning the goods, would be binding. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 31.1
                          CERTIFICATION

I, Adam Cegielski, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Brownsville Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.


Dated: August 11, 2006         By:/s/ Adam Cegielski
                                  Adam Cegielski,
                                  President  and Chief Executive
                                  Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  STATEMENT
        REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Salon City, Inc. for
        the
        nine months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Casciola, our President,
        Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 *   the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial
        condition and results of operations.
 
 /s/ Steven Casciola
 Steven
        Casciola
 President,
        Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 December
        6, 2007
 
  This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section
        18 of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
Case 2:17-cr-01484-DLR Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01484-DLR Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01484-DLR Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01484-DLR Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 4 of 4
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 530 

Commending the purpose of the third annual Civil Rights Baseball Game 

and recognizing the historical significance of the location of the game 

in Cincinnati, Ohio. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2009 

Mr. DRIEHAUS (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the purpose of the third annual Civil Rights 

Baseball Game and recognizing the historical significance 

of the location of the game in Cincinnati, Ohio. 

Whereas the third annual Civil Rights Baseball Game is 

being held in Cincinnati, Ohio, at the Great American 

Ballpark on June 20, 2009; 

Whereas the Cincinnati Reds, the host of the Civil Rights 

Baseball Game, are recognized as being the first professional baseball team in the United States; 

Whereas the Major League Baseball Civil Rights Game was 

created to honor those who fought both on and off the 

field for the equal treatment of all people; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 530 IH 

Whereas baseball was at the forefront of the civil rights 

movement and was integrated before either the Armed 

Forces or the public schools; 

Whereas Cincinnati, Ohio, was home to the Negro League’s 

Cincinnati Tigers from 1934 to 1937; 

Whereas Cincinnati, Ohio, was an integral stop along the Underground Railroad as one of the first free ‘‘stations’’ 

slaves would encounter when escaping north; and 

Whereas Cincinnati, Ohio, is home to the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center, which opened in 2004: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commend the purpose of the third annual 

3 Civil Rights Baseball Game; and 

4 (2) recognize the historical significance of the 

5 location of the Civil Rights Baseball Game in Cin6 cinnati, Ohio. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Richard Smitten, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smitten Press: Local
Lore and Legends, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

<PAGE>

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ RICHARD SMITTEN
-------------------
    Richard Smitten
    CEO and CFO

March 20, 2006
#### Hudson *et al. v.*Neal *et al.*

No. 2859.

September 30, 1922.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Shurley. Warren superior court. September 16, 1921.

*E. P. & J. Gecil Davis,*for plaintiffs in error.

*L. D. McGregor,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

The verdict is supported by evidence. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, show cause for a reversal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JON M. SANDS

Federal Public Defender

J. LEONARDO COSTALES

Louisiana State Bar# 35721

JORDAN PERRY MALKA

State Bar No. 6321055 (Illinois)

Assistant Federal Public Defenders

407 W. Congress, Suite 501

Tucson, AZ 85701-1355

Telephone: (520)879-7500

Attorneys for Defendant

Leo_Costales@fd.org

jordan_malka@fd.org

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States Of America,

 Plaintiff,

v.

Antony Delbert Jones, Jr.,

 Defendant.

CR18-0032-TUC-JAS (EJM)

NOTICE OF NAME CORRECTION

Antony Delbert Jones, Jr., through undersigned counsel, respectfully notifies the 

Court that his true and correct name is Antony Delbert Jones, Jr. “Anthony,” as he has been 

referred to in previous filings, is a common misspelling, but is incorrect.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: May 17, 2019.

JON M. SANDS 

Federal Public Defender

/s/ J. Leonardo Costales 

J. LEONARDO COSTALES

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Case 4:18-cr-00032-JAS-EJM Document 74 Filed 05/17/19 Page 1 of 1
#### Edward ALCORN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

No. 94-CA-604-MR.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 19, 1995.

Case Ordered Published by Court of Appeals June 30, 1995.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1995.

Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court Dec. 14, 1995.

*717J. David Niehaus, Deputy Appellate Defender, Louisville, Daniel T. Goyette, Dist. Publie Defender, Louisville, for appellant.

Chris Gorman, Atty. Gen., E.M. Loweiy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

Before LESTER, C.J., and DYCHE and McDonald, jj.

LESTER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a guilty plea pursuant to RCr 8.09 to the offense of using a minor in a sexual performance and imposing a probated sentence of five years imprisonment.

According to a thirteen-year-old boy, D.T., Edward Alcorn had approached the youngster several times at Holy Name ball field with an offer of money to accompany him to the men’s room where D.T. would expose his genitals while he, Alcorn, masturbated himself. D.T. did this several times with appellant.

Alcorn was indicted under KRS 531.310(1) which provides in subsection (1):

> A person is guilty of the use of a minor in a sexual performance if he employs, consents to, or authorizes or induces a minor to engage in a sexual performance.

KRS 531.300(5) defines “performance” as meaning:

> ... any play, motion picture, photograph or dance. Performance also means any other visual representation exhibited before an audience;

while KRS 531.300(6) states:

> “Sexual performance” means any performance or part thereof which includes sexual conduct by a minor;

In accepting the conditional plea, the trial court acknowledged that appellant could challenge the conviction by raising the issues of whether one person can constitute an audi-enee and whether D.T.’s acts were a “perfor-manee.”

There can be little or no argument that the Legislature sought to prohibit the sexual exploitation of minors including such deviate behavior as Alcorn engaged in in the presence of a child. This would be especially true where the actor used the child in any manner whatsoever whether he physically touched him or not. In an effort to escape the consequences of his action, appellant presents us with six standard dictionary definitions of audience, all of which indicate the presence of more than one person. This is all well and good but bearing in mind the purpose of the statute, we are all too aware that many types of deviate acts do not take place in the presence of two or more people. We hold that for the purposes of KRS 531.300(5) an audience may consist of one person, such as the accused herein.

KRS 531.300(5) also provides that performance means “any other visual representation” and we are unable to agree with Alcorn that D.T.’s exposure of his genitals at the behest of appellant is not a visual representation.

The fact that the child had no physical contact with appellant does not absolve him of guilt. *Gilbert v. Commonwealth,*Ky., 838 S.W.2d 376 (1992).

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Platon Tzouvalis, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB /A  of
Acrongenomics, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Melt Inc.

Dated September 5, 2008.

|/s/ Platon Tzouvalis           | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Platon Tzouvalis               | 
|President                      | 
|(Principal Executive  Officer) | 

---