alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• Interim Decision 41659 

MATTER or Woa-orzcsowsxx 

In Visa Petition Proceedings 

A-14976994 

Decided by District Director September 19, 1966 

Since a veterinarian is a member of. the professions within the meaning of 

section 101(a) (32), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 

89-236, and since beneficiary, who was graduated from the University of 

Chile with a diploma as a veterinarian physician, is a qualified veterinarian, 

a visa petition is approved to accord him preference classification under 

section 203(a) (3) of the Act, as amended. 

The petition was filed by the beneficiary, for third preference 

classification as a member of the professions based upon his qualifications as a veterinarian. 

He is a single, native of Lithuania, and citizen of Chile, presently 

residing in Sewell, Chile. In June 1964, ho was graduated from the 

University of Chile; Santiago, Chile, with a diploma as veterinarian 

physician. He was employed as a veterinarian from June 1964 to 

March 1965 by the Cooperative Agricola Lechera, Osorno lChile; 

and as veterinarian from March 1965 to date by the Ministry of 

Agriculture, Santiago, Chile. The beneficiary intends to be engaged 

in the field of veterinary medicine in the United-States. 

A certification pursuant to section 212(a) (14) of the Act, as 

amended, has been issued by the Department -of Labor. With the 

certification the opinion of that Department was furnished that the 

alien is qualified for third preference classification. 

Veterinarians are listed among piofessional occupations under 

code 07 in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, Volume II, third 

edition, prepared by the Department of Labor. This group includes 

occupations concerned with the health care of humans or animals 

in the fields of medicine, surgery, and dentistry. . 

Section 4741.09 of the State of Ohio Code, Veterinary Practice 

Act, requires that a person seeking to engage in practice as a veteri 

• 867 
Interim Decision #1659 

narian in that State, must.provide evidence of • having graduated 

from veterinary college. 

ruder section 203(a) (3) of the Act, third preference quota status 

may be accorded to qualified immigrants who are members of the 

professions. 

Recognition of professional status normally is attained through 

completion of high education. Section 101(a) (32) of the Act, states 

the term "profession" shall include but not be limited to, architects, 

engineers, lawyers, physicians, surgeons and teachers in elementary 

schools, colleges, academies or seminaries. 

It is concluded that entry into the field of veterinary medicine 

also requires the. high education that is associated with those occupations termed professions in section 101(a) (32) of the Act, and that 

a veterinarian is a member of the professions within the meaning of 

the Act. Further, it is found that the beneficiary is qualified as a 

member of that profession. 

ORDER: It is ordered that the petition be and the same hereby 

is approved. 

868
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of IHS Inc. (the Company), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 31,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: June 23, 2010



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jerre L. Stead                                  
|Jerre L. Stead                                      
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                
|                                                    
|/s/ Michael J. Sullivan                             
|Michael J. Sullivan                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 10, 2022 No. 04-22-00451-CV IN RE Francisco Moises GARZA III Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 

### O R D E R Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice On July 21, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition, real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and the record, this court concluded relator did not show he is entitled to the relief sought and denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on September 21, 2022. See In re Garza, No. 04-22-00451-CV, 2022 WL 4362298 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 21, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). On September 27, 2022, relator filed a motion for rehearing that requested this court rule on an issue not raised in relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. After consideration, relator’s motion for rehearing is DENIED

. It is so ORDERED on October 10, 2022. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI12544, styled In the Interest of C.R.G.P., a Minor Child , pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.
Exhibit 4.31

ALLONGE TO

2006 CONVERTIBLE BRIDGE NOTE DATED JULY 31, 2006

THIS ALLONGE (Allonge) is made effective as of September 22, 2006 by and between SYNOVA HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
(Maker) and  (Payee).

BACKGROUND



| | A. | Maker executed and delivered to Payee a certain 2006 Convertible Bridge Note dated July 31, 2006 payable to the order of Payee (the Note).
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. | Payee and Maker desire that the terms of the Note be modified.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits inuring to Maker and Payee, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Note is hereby modified as follows:

1. Defined Terms. The definition of Subsequent Offering shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Subsequent Offering means any sale of any Securities of Maker after the Original Issue Date, which results in gross proceeds to the
Company of at least $5,000,000.

2. Failure to Complete Subsequent Offering. If the Maker fails to complete the Subsequent Offering
by October 31, 2006 and the Conversion Price then in effect is greater than $1.00, then the Conversion Price shall forthwith be reduced to $1.00 per share.

3. No Other Modifications. No other provisions of the Note shall be modified hereby except as expressly set forth herein, and this Allonge shall not be construed as a waiver of any of Payees rights or
remedies under the Note as heretofore existing or as hereafter modified by this Allonge.

4. Inconsistencies. To the extent of any
inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Allonge and the terms and conditions of the Note, the terms and conditions of this Allonge shall prevail. All terms and conditions of the Note not inconsistent herewith shall remain in full
force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by Maker.

5. Affixation to Term Note. This Allonge shall be firmly affixed
to the Note, whereupon the Note and this Allonge shall constitute a single instrument.

6. No Novation. Maker hereby acknowledges
and agrees that this Allonge is in no way intended to constitute a novation of the Note or any indebtedness evidenced thereby.



---

IN WITNESS WHERE, Maker and Payee have executed this Allonge under seal on the date first above written.



PAYEE:


By:


By:


Name:


Title:


MAKER:


SYNOVA HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.


By:


Name:


Title:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Quincy Elijah Alexander Maddock, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-17-01564-01-PHX-JJT 

ORDER OF DETENTION 

 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Probation were held on June 21, 2019. 

The Court Finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has 

consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. 

 The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of proof 

by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that he is 

neither a serious flight risk nor a danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 

1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 21st day of June, 2019.
Presidential Documents

27001

Federal Register

Vol. 61, No. 105

Thursday, May 30, 1996

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 96–25 of May 16, 1996

Waiver of Statutory Restrictions To Permit

Assistance to Turkey

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 562 of the Foreign Operations, Export

Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1996 (Public Law 104–

107) (The ‘‘Act’’), I hereby determine that it is in the national security

interest of the United States to make funds available for assistance in support

of Turkey notwithstanding the restriction in subsection (a) of section 562.

You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination and justification to the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, May 16, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–13655

Filed 5–29–96; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                MMC ENERGY, INC.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MMC Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Karl W. Miller, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MMC Energy, Inc. and will be retained by MMC Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

August 14, 2006


                                        /S/ KARL W. MILLER
                                        -------------------------------
                                        KARL W. MILLER
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mikkel Jordahl, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

Mark Brnovich, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-08263-PCT-DJH

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on a Joint Stipulation regarding Plaintiffs’ Petition 

for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Expenses (Doc. 98). Pursuant to the stipulation of the 

parties,

IT IS ORDERED approving the Stipulation (Doc. 98). If the Court determines 

that an award of fees and costs should issue under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, the amount of fees 

and costs shall be $125,000 and $1,700, respectively.1 The parties shall brief the remaining 

issue of whether this Court can and/or should issue an award of costs and fees under 42 

U.S.C. § 1988. Accordingly, 

///

///

///

///

///

1 Plaintiffs state that they are reserving the right to seek additional fees-on-fees for time 

spent litigating whether they are entitled to attorneys’ fees.

Case 3:17-cv-08263-DJH Document 99 Filed 03/31/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• Plaintiffs shall have until May 15, 2020 to file their Petition for Attorneys’ 

Fees, Costs, and Expenses.

• Defendants shall have until June 19, 2020 to file their response to Plaintiffs’ 

Petition.

• Plaintiffs shall have until July 10, 2020 to file a reply in support of their 

Petition.

Dated this 30th day of March, 2020.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-08263-DJH Document 99 Filed 03/31/20 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

** **
| **NAME**                        | ** ** | **JURISDICTION OF FORMATION** |
|---------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------|
| ** **                      | ** ** | ** **                    |
| CM Intermediary, LLC            |       | Delaware                      |
|                            |       |                          |
| Crown Media United States, LLC  |       | Delaware                      |
|                            |       |                          |
| Crown Media Distribution, LLC   |       | Delaware                      |
|                            |       |                          |
| Citi TeeVee, LLC                |       | Delaware                      |
|                            |       |                          |
| Doone City Pictures, LLC        |       | Delaware                      |
|                            |       |                          |
| Waygoose Concerts Services B.V. |       | The Netherlands               |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1




Certificate of Chief
Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002




In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Summus, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Gary E. Ban, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the periods presented in the Report.





Date:       March 31, 2005
    /s/ Gary E.
      BanGary E. BanChief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28582-28584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14005]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 28583]]

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP); Operational 
Plan; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Correction to notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the Federal Radiological 
Emergency Response Plan (FRERP) published as a notice in the Federal 
Register on Wednesday, May 8, 1996 (61 FR 20944). Two figures were 
inadvertently omitted from that notice.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas M. Antush, Operations Division, 
Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, telephone (202) 646-3617.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The notice that is the subject of these corrections gives notice of 
and publishes the Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP) 
as the operational plan for Federal agencies to discharge their 
responsibilities during peacetime radiological emergencies. The FRERP 
establishes an organized, integrated capability for participating 
Federal agencies to respond to a wide range of peacetime radiological 
emergencies. The Plan provides a concept of operations, outlines 
Federal policies and planning considerations, and specifies authorities 
and responsibilities of each Federal agency that has a significant role 
in such emergencies.

Need for Correction

    Figure II-1, Notification Process, referred to at 61 FR 20960, E. 
Stages of the Federal Response, 1. Notification, and Figure II-2, 
Onscene Response Operations Structure, referred to at 61 FR 20961, E. 
Stages of the Federal Response, 3. Response Operations, were 
inadvertently omitted. These figures depict graphically a process and 
operations structure important to the notification and response 
operations stages of the Federal response to a radiological emergency.
John P. Carey,
General Counsel.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on May 8, 1996 of the notice, Federal 
Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP); Operational Plan, which 
was the subject of FR Doc. 96-11313, is corrected by inserting on 61 FR 
20962 before Appendix A the following figures:

[[Page 28584]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05JN96.008

[FR Doc. 96-14005 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-C
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Larry BOSTIC, Defendant/Appellant. Larry BOSTIC, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 67319, 70502.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 10, 1996.

*181Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, for Defendant/Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for PlaintiffiRespon-dent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by the trial court of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant to a prison term of ten years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant does not address any points in his appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Therefore, that appeal is considered abandoned. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
**AMENDMENT****TO EMPLOYMENT****AGREEMENT**     This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the31st day of July, 2006 by and between SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. (“STWA”), a Nevada charteredcorporation, and ERIN BROCKOVICH (the “Executive”).**BACKGROUND**     A. STWAhas employed the Executive pursuant to the provisions of an EmploymentAgreement between the Executive and STWA dated as of September 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”).     B. Theterm of the Agreement was previously extended to July 31, 2006.     C. The parties desire to further extend the term of the Agreement to February 28,2007.     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which ishereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:     1. Section 3of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:     “3.**Term of Agreement** The Executive’s employment under this Agreement shallcommence on September 1, 2004 and, except as otherwise provided herein, shallcontinue until February 28, 2007; provided, however, that thereafter, the term of thisAgreement shall automatically be extended for one additional year beyond the termotherwise established unless, prior to such date, STWA or the Executive shall havegiven a Notice of Non-Extension.”     2. Except as hereinabove amended or modified the Agreement is and shall remainin full force and effect in accordance with its terms.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date firstabove written.SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.         By: /s/ EUGENE E. EICHLER   /s/ Erin Brockovich           Its:  Chief Executive Officer   ERIN BROCKOVICH
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     Thomas H. Waechter (“Executive”) and Stratex Networks, Inc. (the “Company”), are parties to an
Employment Agreement of May 18, 2006 (the “Agreement”). Executive and the Company now wish to
amend the Agreement, and thus they agree as set forth below. This Amendment shall be deemed
effective as of September 1, 2006.



     1. In subparagraphs 5(c)(i) and 5(e) of the Agreement, the phrase “eighteen (18)” is deleted,
and replaced with the phrase “twenty-four (24)”.



     2. In subparagraph 5(c)(v)(x) of the Agreement, the phrase “eighteen (18)” is deleted, and
replaced with the phrase “twenty-four (24)”; provided, however, that if this extension of the stock
option exercise period described in subparagraph 5(c)(v)(x) shall cause the Executive’s stock
options to be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
(“Section 409A”), then that option exercise period will automatically be reduced to the longest
period of time that will not cause the Executive’s stock options to be subject to the excise tax
imposed by Section 409A.



     Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Dated:  September 26, 2006 	/s/ Thomas H. Waechter
 	 
	 	Thomas H. Waechter 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	Dated:  September 26, 2006 	Stratex Networks, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Chuck Kissner
 	 
	 	Its:              Chuck Kissner 	 
	 	 	Chairman