alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Rakesh Malhotra, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Uranium Hunter
Corporation;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: February 13, 2008             By:  /s/ Rakesh Malhotra
       -----------------                  -------------------
                                          Rakesh Malhotra,
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12598]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 61 FR 21469-70, May 
10, 1996.

Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 10:00 a.m., 
Wednesday, May 15, 1996.

Changes in the Meeting: The open meeting has been canceled, and the 
scheduled items were handled via notation voting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: May 15, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-12598 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

               Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each ofthe undersigned officers of Services Acquisition Corp. International, aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

               The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| Dated: | May 12, 2006 | /s/ Steven R. Berrard                      |
|--------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |              | Steven R. Berrard                          |
|   |              | Chief Executive Officer                    |
|   |              | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal |
|   |              | Financial and Accounting Officer)          |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David T. Gulian,the Chief Executive Officer of InfoLogix, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

·             theForm 10-Q of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

·             theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:  August 14, 2007     |
|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ David T. Gulian                   |   |
| David T. Gulian                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28595-28596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13995]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing in the National Register were received by the National Park 
Service before MAY 25, 1996. Pursuant to Sec. 60.13 of 36 CFR Part 60 
written comments concerning the significance of these properties under 
the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded to the 
National Register, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, 
D.C. 20013-7127. Written comments should be submitted by June 20, 1996.
Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register.

California

San Francisco County

Folger Coffee Company Building,
101 Howard St.,
San Francisco, 96000679

Louisiana

Webster Parish

Downtown Minden Historic District,
Roughly bounded by Monroe, Pine, Main, E. Union, Chevrolet, and 
Fogle Sts., Minden, 96000680

Nebraska

Jefferson County

Fairbury Rock Island Depot and Freight House,
S side of 2nd St. between I and J Sts.,
Fairbury, 96000681

Platte County

Humphrey City Hall,
407 S. 4th St.,
Humphrey, 96000682

Polk County

Strickland Site,
Approximately 3.5 mi. N of NE 92, 5.7 mi. S and 3 mi W of Silver 
Cr.,
Silver Creek vicinity, 96000683

New York

Rensselaer County

Delaney Hotel,
Jct. of NY 22 and NY 67,
North Hoosick, 96000684

South Carolina

Beaufort County

Bluffton Historic District,
Roughly bounded by the May River, Huger Cove, and Bridge St.,
Bluffton, 96000686

Charleston County

Porter Military Academy,
175--181 Ashley Ave.,
Charleston, 96000685

Tennessee

Rutherford County

Williamson, Thomas, House,
2263 Little Rock Rd.,
Eagleville vicinity, 96000687

Texas

Hunt County

Hunt County Courthouse,
2500 Lee St.,
Greenville, 96000688

Vermont

Bennington County

East Arlington Village Historic District,
Roughly bounded by Old Mill, Ice Pond, E. Arlington, and Warm Brook 
Rds., Maple and Pleasant Sts., and the Lane,

[[Page 28596]]

Arlington, 96000689

    A proposed move is being considered for the following property:

Wisconsin

Dane County

Waunaukee Railroad Depot
Jct. of South and Main Sts.
Waunaukee, 78000092

[FR Doc. 96-13995 Filed 6-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 523 

Congratulating the Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity on the occasion of its 

100th Anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2009 

Mr. ROONEY (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. KINGSTON, and Mr. PAUL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity on the 

occasion of its 100th Anniversary. 

Whereas the Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity was founded on 

November 2, 1909, by Warren A. Cole at Boston University; 

Whereas Lambda Chi Alpha provides students of good moral 

character, in various collegiate institutions throughout 

the United States, an opportunity to associate; 

Whereas the fraternity fosters a high moral and spiritual 

standard of life based on Christian ideals; 

Whereas the fraternity promotes honorable friendship and 

cultivates intellectual excellence; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 523 IH 

Whereas the fraternity secures for members the greatest advantages in college life; 

Whereas the fraternity facilitates brotherly love, mutual aid, 

and close personal connections between undergraduates, 

alumni, and colleges; 

Whereas Lambda Chi Alpha binds its members together during college, as well as in life after college, through mutual 

interests and enjoyments and by testing each member to 

act with courage, self-control, obedience, democracy, and 

courtesy toward all with whom he may come in contact; 

Whereas Lambda Chi Alpha is one of the largest men’s general fraternities in North America, having more than 

265,000 initiated members and more than 200 active 

subsidiaries at colleges and universities; 

Whereas Lambda Chi Alpha offers a co-curricular experience 

to complement higher education by providing young men 

with opportunities for academic achievement, leadership 

development, and lifelong friendships; and 

Whereas the fraternity boasts two Nobel Prize Winners, two 

Medal of Honor recipients, three Peabody Award Winners, and a former Supreme Court Justice: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the Lambda Chi Alpha Fra3 ternity on the occasion of its 100th Anniversary; and 

4 (2) recognizes the members of Lambda Chi 

5 Alpha Fraternity for their work and dedication to 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 523 IH 

1 making the fraternity an outstanding and honorable 

2 association. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.89

[HALLMARK CHANNEL LOGO]

January 29,
2008

Mr. Brian
Stewart
4354 Mariota Ave.
Toluca Lake, CA 91602



Dear
Mr. Stewart:

This
will confirm our agreement to amend your employment agreement with Crown Media Holdings, Inc. ("Crown") dated July 24, 2006 (the "Agreement") as follows:



Except
as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

|                               |  | Very truly yours,
Crown Media Holdings, Inc.
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|                               |  | By:                                         
|Agreed and Accepted:           |  |                                             
|/s/ Brian StewartBrian Stewart |  |                                             

[CROWN MEDIA LOGO]

A
Crown Media Holdings, Inc. Company

1325
Avenue of the Americas, 22nd Fl., New York, NY 10019 Ph:212.445.6600Fx:212.957.5392
hallmarkchannel.com

---



QuickLinks
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134721 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DONNA L. DONAHUE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134721 

 COA: 276103 

WCAC: 06-000203 

CATERAID, INC., and CINCINNATI

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

SKY MIGUEL LITTLE COYOTE, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30181 

D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00015-SPW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Sky Miguel Little Coyote appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 10-month sentence imposed upon his fourth revocation of 

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Little Coyote contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-30181 

because, in light of his severe emotional problems, imposition of a custodial term 

will not ensure the protection of the public, deter him, or result in his rehabilitation. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 

38, 51 (2007). The high-end sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 

18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, 

including Little Coyote’s repeated violations of supervised release. See Gall, 552 

U.S. at 51; United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir. 2007) (at a 

revocation sentencing, violator may be sanctioned for breaching the court’s trust). 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1404]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 136

[FRL-5404-7]


Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of 
Pollutants: New Methods; Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reopening 
the comment period for the proposed guidelines establishing new 
analytical methods for use under the Clean Water Act, which were 
published in the Federal Register on October 18, 1995 (60 FR 53988). 
The public comment period for the proposed rule was to end on December 
18, 1995.

DATES: Comments on the proposed guidelines will be accepted until April 
2, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted by mail to the 304(h) Docket 
Clerk (Ben Honaker), Water Docket (MC-4101), U.S. EPA, 401 M. Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Longbottom, Aquatic Research 
Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and 
Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 
45268. Telephone number: (513) 569-7308.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The methods proposed for addition on October 
18, 1995, (60 FR 53988) include new methods for: preparation of samples 
for metals analysis, inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry (ICP/
MS), a stabilized temperature graphite furnace atomic absorption 
(STGFAA) method for metals, and ion chromatography (IC) methods for 
anions and hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]. A revised EPA inductively 
coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) method for metals 
to replace the currently approved method, and an extension of the 
approved method for the determination of low level total residual 
chlorine were also proposed. The specific methods included in the 
rulemaking are as follows: EPA Methods 180.1, 200.7, 200.8, 200.9, 
218.6, 300.0, 611, and 625; SMEWW, Method 4500-CL E; and Standard 
Methods Method 6410B.
    All written comments submitted in accordance with the instructions 
in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and received by April 2, 1996, 
including those received between the close of the comment period on 
December 18, 1995, and the publication of this notice will be entered 
into the public record and considered by EPA before promulgation of the 
final rule.

    Dated: January 23, 1996.
Robert Perciasepe,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 96-1404 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL ANTHONY TORRES, AKA 

Mikey, 

Applicant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent.

No. 20-71724 

MEMORANDUM*

Application to File Second or Successive Petition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Argued and Submitted June 11, 2021

Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,** District 

Judge.

Applicant Michael Anthony Torres seeks leave to file a second or successive 

motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that his conviction for 

possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence or drug trafficking 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge 

for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAR 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

offense under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) is invalid because his predicate crime—

racketeering—is no longer a categorical “crime of violence” under a new rule of 

constitutional law announced in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019).1 We 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and we grant Torres’s request for leave to 

file a second or successive § 2255 habeas motion. 

In our concurrently filed opinion, Muñoz Gonzalez v. United States, __F.4th__

(9th Cir. 2022), we adopted a pragmatic approach for determining whether a new 

rule of constitutional law was “previously unavailable” within the meaning of 

§ 2255(h)(2) that focuses on systemic barriers, including timing and accessible 

procedural means for presenting a claim. Applying this approach here, we conclude 

that an argument based on the new rule announced in Davis was not available to 

Torres while his first habeas motion was still pending. The district court rejected 

Torres’s initial habeas motion less than two months after the Supreme Court issued 

Davis. Torres faced multiple institutional hurdles in accessing legal resources and

preparing and filing legal documents and, unlike in Muñoz Gonzalez, there is no 

1

The verdict form did not require the jury to specify which conviction—

racketeering or Torres’s two drug offenses—served as the predicate offense for his 

§ 924(c) conviction. The government concedes that, despite the uncertainty about 

which offense was the predicate for his § 924(c) conviction, Torres can establish that 

Davis at least advances his claim. See Henry v. Spearman, 899 F.3d 703, 706 (9th 

Cir. 2018) (petitioner need only show “possible merit to warrant a fuller exploration 

by the district court”) (citation omitted).
3 

indication that Torres knew about Davis during the very short window of time before 

his initial habeas motion was denied. Given these restraints, we find that the realworld circumstances that Torres faced rendered his Davis claim previously 

unavailable to him.

The request for leave to file a second or successive habeas motion is

GRANTED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RONNIE ATMORE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-735 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge. Shiobhan Olivero of Olivero Law, P.A., Brandon, for Appellant. Ronnie T. Atmore, pro se. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KELLY, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Patricia MacCorquodale, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Arizona Board of Regents, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-18-00028-TUC-RCC 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 46), IT IS 

ORDERED the above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to 

bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. The Clerk of Court shall docket accordingly and 

close the case file in this matter. 

 Dated this 25th day of July, 2019. 

Case 4:18-cv-00028-RCC Document 47 Filed 07/25/19 Page 1 of 1