alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each ofthe undersigned officers of Uranium Hunter Corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fullycomplies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Dated: August 17, 2009 

/s/ Reno J. Calabrigo       Reno J. Calabrigo Chief Executive Officer Uranium Hunter Corporation 

Dated: August 17, 2009 

/s/ Rakesh Malhotra       Rakesh Malhotra Chief Financial Officer Uranium Hunter Corporation 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Uranium Hunter Corporation and will be retainedby Uranium Hunter Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. 

----
Case 2:17-mj-09498-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-09498-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-09498-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-09498-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1



       STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF INDUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Transition Report of Indus International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas R. Madison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas R. Madison
---------------------------------
Thomas R. Madison
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2003


                                      73
#### Aymen Hassan AL-HAJ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 429-96.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Nov. 6, 1996.

Stanley Schneider, Houston, for appellant.

Carol M. Cameron, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Matthew Paul, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant pled guilty to the offense of delivery of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at six years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. *Al-Haj v. State,*916 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly addressed appellant’s second point of error. After careful review of the appellate record, Court of Appeals’ opinion, as well as the briefs and oral argument before this Court, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed. Tex. R.App.Pro. 202(k).

Petition for Discretionary Review Dismissed.

CLINTON, J., concurs.

WHITE, J., not participating.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Rakesh Malhotra, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB of Uranium Hunter Corporation;

2.

Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.

The small
business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a)

Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.

The small
business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a)

All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.

|Dated: July 31,
    2008 | By: | /s/ Rakesh Malhotra              
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------
|                         |     | Rakesh Malhotra,                 
|                         |     | Chief Financial
    Officer      
|                         |     | (Principal Financial
    Officer)
|                         |     |                                  

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13096]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Intent to Repatriate a Cultural Item in the Possession 
of the Olmsted County Historical Society, Rochester, MN

AGENCY: National Park Service

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given under the Native American Graves Protection 
and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3005 (a)(2), of the intent to 
repatriate a cultural item in the possession of the Olmsted County 
Historical Society, Rochester, MN, which meets the definition of 
``sacred object'' under Section 2 of the Act.
    The cultural item is a birchbark scroll with mnemonic symbols.
    In 1949, this scroll was donated by Dr. A.U. Desjardins to the 
Olmsted County Historical Society. Accession records indicate this 
scroll was made by the Midewiwin Lodge at Cass Lake, on the Leech Lake 
Reservation, MN. There is no further information regarding Dr. 
Desjardins' acquisition of this scroll.
    Representatives of the Leech Lake Band of Chippewa have stated that 
this scroll is needed by traditional Native American religious leaders 
for the practice of traditional Ojibwe religion by present-day 
adherents.
    Based on the above-mentioned information, officials of the Olmsted 
County Historical Society have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 
3001(3)(C), this cultural item is a specific ceremonial object needed 
by traditional Native American religious leaders for the practice of 
traditional Native American religions by their present-day adherents.  
Officials of the Olmsted County Historical Society have also determined 
that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared 
group identity which can be reasonably traced between these items and 
the Leech Lake Band of Chippewa.
    This notice has been sent to officials of the Leech Lake Band of 
Chippewa. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes 
itself to be culturally affiliated with these objects should contact 
Margot L. Ballard, Curator, Olmsted County Historical Society, 1195 
County Road 22 SW, Rochester, MN 55902, telephone (507) 282-9447 before 
June 24, 1996. Repatriation of these objects to the Leech Lake Band of 
Chippewa may begin after that date if no additional claimants come 
forward.
Dated: May 16, 1996.
Francis P. McManamon,
Departmental Consulting Archeologist.
Chief, Archeology and Ethnography Program.
[FR Doc. 96-13096 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-F
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 14, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00484

- CV

IN RE CAPITOL COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on July 8, 2014. On August 13, 2014,

relator filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus on the basis that

the issues raised in the mandamus proceeding have been rendered moot by the parti es’ agreement

in the underlying matter.

Relator’s unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus is GRANTED.

This original mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT. This court’s opinion will issue

at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on August 14 th , 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14 th day of August, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013

- CI

- 14402, styled Albertha Stiff v. Capitol County Mutual Fire

Insurance Co. , pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales

presiding.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDY ANTONIO ESPINOZA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73101

Agency No. A094-316-781

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Fredy Antonio Espinoza, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, see Mohammed v.

FILED

NOV 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73101

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny in part and dismiss

in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Espinoza’s motion to

reopen on the ground that he failed to demonstrate the evidence he submitted was

material and previously unavailable. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Espinoza’s challenge to the adverse

credibility finding contained in the agency’s prior orders because this petition for

review is not timely as to those orders. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th

Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
FINCHIMICA S.P.A., Appellant

v.

ADAMA MAKHTESHIM LTD
., Appellee

______________________

2017

- 2195

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016

- 00577.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

E DWARD A NTHONY F IGG , Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by S ETH E DWARD C OCKRUM
, R OBERT D ANNY H UNTINGTON

.

N ORMAN H. Z IVIN , Cooper & Dunham, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by E RIC E ISENBERG
, G ARY G ERSHIK

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST
, Chief Judge, W ALLACH and
H UGHES
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

August 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13242]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. IA 96-020; ASLBP No. 96-715-03-EA]


Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 F.R. 28710 (1972), and Sections 
2.105, 2.700, 2.702, 2.714, 2.714a, 2.717, 2.721, and 2.772(j) of the 
Commission's Regulations, all as amended, an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board is being established to preside over the following 
proceeding.

 Juan and Laurene Guzman

Order Prohibiting Unescorted Access or Involvement in NRC-Licensed 
Activities (Effective Immediately)

IA 96-020

    This Board is being established as a result of a April 19, 1996 NRC 
staff order. The petitioners, Juan and Laurene Guzman, are requesting a 
hearing in accordance with 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.202.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

G. Paul Bollwerk, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555
Charles N. Kelber, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555
David R. Schink, Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, 
College Station, Texas 77843.

    All correspondence, documents and other materials shall be filed 
with the Judges in accordance with 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.701.

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of May 1996.
B. Paul Cotter, Jr.,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 96-13242 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
1/16/2018 www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civil_js44.pl

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civil_js44.pl 1/2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Civil Cover Sheet

This automated JS-44 conforms generally to the manual JS-44 approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September

1974. The data is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. The information contained

herein neither replaces nor supplements the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law. This form is authorized for

use only in the District of Arizona.

The completed cover sheet must be printed directly to PDF and filed as an attachment to the

Complaint or Notice of Removal.

Plaintiff(s): Defendant(s):

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Health &

Welfare Plan, Plan Identification

Number 597 ; The Hartford

County of Residence: Outside the State of Arizona County of Residence: Outside the State of Arizona

County Where Claim For Relief Arose: Maricopa

Plaintiff's Atty(s): Defendant's Atty(s):

Barry Kirschner 

Waterfall Economidis

5210 E. Williams Circle, #800

Tucson, Arizona 85711

(520) 745-7810

II. Basis of Jurisdiction: 3. Federal Question (U.S. not a party)

III. Citizenship of Principal

Parties (Diversity Cases Only)

Plaintiff:-N/A

Defendant:-N/A

IV. Origin : 1. Original Proceeding

V. Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance

VI.Cause of Action: ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1132. Termination of Plaintiff's short-term disability

benefits

VII. Requested in Complaint

Class Action:No

Dollar Demand:Declaratory action

Jury Demand:No

VIII. This case is not related to another case.

Case 4:18-cv-00017-FRZ Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 2
1/16/2018 www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civil_js44.pl

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civil_js44.pl 2/2

Signature: /s/ Barry Kirschner

 Date: 1/16/2018

If any of this information is incorrect, please go back to the Civil Cover Sheet Input form using the Back button in your browser

and change it. Once correct, save this form as a PDF and include it as an attachment to your case opening documents.

Revised: 01/2014

Case 4:18-cv-00017-FRZ Document 1-1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc., (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
(the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 20, 2006 |  | /s/ Stephen E. King                 
|                        |  | Stephen E. King                     
|                        |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Jerry M. ALSTOTT, Appellant, v. Kerry FLOYD, Respondent.

No. WD 47617.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 25, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 1, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied April 26, 1994.

John H. Trader, Millin & Trader, Kansas City, for appellant.

Edward A. Coulson, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and KENNEDY and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

*508
      *ORDER*

Appeal from the denial of a motion for *nunc pro tunc*to “correct a judgment” affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Leif Jones, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-17-8281-01-PCT-DMF 

ORDER OF DETENTION 

 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Supervised Release were held on April 19, 2018. 

The Court Finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has 

consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. 

 The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of 

proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., 

that he is not a serious flight risk. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 20th day of April, 2018. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Silicon Graphics International Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 25, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mark J. Barrenechea, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and James D. Wheat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 3, 2010

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 3rdday of February, 2010



|                           |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/    Mark J. Barrenechea |  |  |  | /s/    James D. Wheat  
|Mark J. Barrenechea        |  |  |  | James D. Wheat         
|CEO and President          |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.