Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Proposed Rules 25839

under the authority in 33 CFR 6.04–7,

the COTP will not allow any person to

remain on vessels moored at Marriott

Marina finger piers G, H, I, and J.

The COTP, working with the Secret

Service and other law enforcement

authorities during this operation, may

impose other restrictions within the

security zone if circumstances dictate.

Restrictions imposed by the COTP will

be tailored to impose the least impact on

maritime interests while ensuring the

security of the Marriott Marina or any

adjacent vessels, waterfront facilities, or

waters.

Regulatory Evaluation

This proposal is not a significant

regulatory action under section 3(f) of

Executive Order 12866 and does not

require an assessment of potential costs

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that

order. It has been exempted from review

by the Office of Management and

Budget under that order. It is not

significant under the regulatory policies

and procedures of the Department of

Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040;

February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard

expects the economic impact of this

proposal to be so minimal that a full

Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph

10(e) of the regulatory policies and

procedures of DOT is unnecessary.

Small Entities

Under 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., known as

the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Coast

Guard must consider whether this

proposal will have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. ‘‘Small

Entities’’ include independently owned

and operated small businesses that are

not dominant in their field and that

otherwise qualify as ‘‘small business

concerns’’ under section 3 of the small

Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). The

Captain of the Port may grant

permission for vessels to enter or remain

in the security zone, subject to the

conditions discussed previously. Costs

incurred by vessel owners and

commercial entities within the security

zone are expected to be minimal. Any

such costs are greatly outweighed by the

need to ensure the security of those

attending the Republican National

Convention by securing the nearby

Marriott Marina and any adjacent

vessels, waterfront facilities, or waters.

Since the impact of this proposal is

expected to be minimal, the Coast Guard

certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this

proposal, if adopted, will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

Collection of Information

This proposal contains no collection

of information requirements under the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.).

Federalism Assessment

This action has been analyzed in

accordance with the principles and

criteria contained in Executive Order

12612, and this action does not raise

sufficient federalism implications to

warrant the preparation of a Federalism

Assessment.

Environmental Assessment

This proposed rule has been

thoroughly reviewed by the Coast Guard

and determined to be categorically

excluded from further environmental

documentation in accordance with

section 2.B.2.c of Commandant

Instruction M16475. 1B, as revised in 59

FR 38654, July 29, 1994. A Categorical

Exclusion Determination and

Environmental Analysis Checklist are

included in the docket.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Security measures,

Waterways.

Proposed Regulations

In consideration of the foregoing, 33

CFR part 165 is proposed to be amended

as follows:

PART 165—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 165

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C.1231; 50 U.S.C. 191:

33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–6 and 160.5; 49 CFR

1.46.

2. A new section 165.T11–030 is

added to read as follows:

§ 165.T11–030 Security Zone; San Diego

Bay, San Diego, CA.

(a) Location. The following area is a

security zone: the water and land area

adjacent to the San Diego Convention

Center, San Diego, CA, described as

follows:

Beginning at 32°42′26′′N, 117°09′56′′W;

then southwest to 32°42′20′′N, 117°10′01′′W;

then southwest to 32°42′16′′N, 117°10′07′′W;

then southeast to the outer channel line to

32°42′13′′N, 117°10′02′′W; then continuing

along the outer channel line to 32°42′09′′N,

117°09′50′′W; then northwest to point of land

at 32°42′16′′N, 117°09′42′′W; then along

shoreline to the point of beginning. (Datum:

NAD 83)

(b) Effective dates. This section is in

effect from 8 a.m. PDT on August 11,

1996 until 11 p.m. PDT on August 15,

1996.

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with

the general regulations in § 165.33, entry

into this zone is prohibited except as

authorized by the Captain of the Port.

(2) The COTP may grant permission

for a vessel to enter or remain within the

security zone if the owners or operators

consent to a search of their vessel for the

purpose of locating explosives,

weapons, or other articles or things

which could pose a threat to the

security of the Marriott Marina, adjacent

vessels, waterfront facilities, or waters.

(3) All persons and vessels within the

security zone shall comply with the

instructions of the Coast Guard Captain

of the Port or the designated on scene

patrol personnel. Upon being hailed via

siren, radio, flashing light, or other

means, the operator of a vessel shall

follow the instructions of the patrol

personnel.

(4) The Captain of the Port will notify

the public of the status of this security

zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast

on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 22

(157.1 MHz).

Dated: April 26, 1996.

J.A. Watson,

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of

the Port, San Diego.

[FR Doc. 96–13041 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

36 CFR Part 701

[Docket No. LOC 96–2]

Acquisition of Library Materials by

Non-purchase Means and Disposition

of Surplus Library Materials

AGENCY: Library of Congress.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Library of Congress is

proposing to revise its policy on the

transfer of surplus library materials to

reduce the volume and type of materials

it receives from Federal agencies. The

Library wishes to eliminate the transfer

of all bound and unbound serials and

restrict all other transfers to certain

specific categories.

DATES: Comments should be received on

or before June 24, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Ten copies of written

comments should be addressed, if sent

by mail to: Library of Congress, Mail

Code 1050, Washington, D.C. 20540. If

delivered by hand, copies should be

brought to: Office of the General

Counsel, James Madison Memorial

Building, Room LM–601, First and

Independence Avenue, S.E.,
25840 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Proposed Rules

Washington, D.C. 20540–1050, (202)

707–6316.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Johnnie M. Barksdale, Regulations

Officer, Office of the General Counsel,

Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.

20540–1050. Telephone No. (202) 707–

1593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 2

U.S.C. 131, 136, and 149, the Librarian

of Congress has general and specific

authority for the administration and

disposition of Library materials; it

pertains to the organization and

handling of duplicate materials and to

the exchange and transfer operations of

the Library, sale, donation to domestic

educational institutions and public

bodies, and the disposition of materials

not needed for any of these uses. In

order to enhance these operations and to

fill gaps in its permanent collections,

the Library of Congress has encouraged

libraries and other agencies of the

Federal Government to send to the

Library’s Exchange and Gift Division all

library materials that are surplus to their

needs. For several decades this program

benefitted the Library, the Federal

library community and the general

public. Because of reductions in staffing

levels, due to budgetary constraints, and

reduced demand in some categories, the

Library can no longer fully utilize these

materials. In analyzing the costs and

benefits to the Federal Government, the

Library found that the expenses to

administer the current program far

outweigh the benefits. By implementing

this regulation, the Library will be able

to redirect its remaining fiscal and

human resources to efficiently

administer a reduced, but more focused,

program. Other Federal agencies will

achieve considerable savings in labor

and postage by not having to handle and

ship unwanted materials to the Library

of Congress. The proposed replacement

text for 36 CFR 701.33(a)(4) is revised to

set forth the general policy on the

transfer of surplus library materials to

reduce the volume and type of materials

it receives from Federal agencies.

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 701

Libraries, Seals and insignias.

Proposed Regulations

In consideration of the foregoing the

Library of Congress proposes to amend

36 CFR part 701 as follows:

PART 701—PROCEDURES AND

SERVICES

1. The authority citation for part 701

will continue to read as follows:

Authority: 2 U.S.C. 131, 136 & 149.

2. Section 701.33(a)(4) is revised to

read as follows:

§ 701.33 Acquisition of library materials by

non-purchase means and disposition of

surplus library materials.

* * * * *

(4) Transfer. Libraries and other

agencies of the Federal Government are

encouraged to send to the Library for

disposition soft or hard-bound books

that are surplus to their needs in the

following categories: Novels and

Reference works (e.g. encyclopedias,

directories, guides, such as

Encyclopedia of Associations, The

World of Learning, The Statesman’s

Yearbook, Books in Print, etc.) not older

than three years. And not older than five

years in: Humanities (art, music, belles

lettres etc.); History and area studies;

Social sciences (economics, politics,

etc.); Education; and Science

(agriculture, medicine, computer

science, mathematics, physics, etc.).

Such transferred materials are needed to

fill gaps in the Library’s holdings, for

exchanges, to transfer to other Federal

agencies, and to make available through

the Surplus Books Program to qualified

recipients. The Library’s Exchange and

Gift Division (E&G) requests notification

at the earliest possible date of any

government libraries that are scheduled

to close or be substantially reduced. The

Library also requests that shipments of

1,000 pounds or more be cleared with

E&G in advance. The Library does not

accept bound and unbound serials.

Federal agencies should dispose of

surplus serials, and other surplus library

materials not specified above, in

accordance with their agency’s

regulations governing the disposal of

surplus materials.

* * * * *

Dated: May 16, 1996.

Approved by:

James H. Billington,

The Librarian of Congress.

[FR Doc. 96–12895 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1410–04–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[NC–80–1–9619b & NC–81–1–9620b; FRL–

5505–5]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Forsyth County:

Approval of Revisions to the Forsyth

County Local Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: On November 29, and

December 28, 1995, the State of North

Carolina, through the North Carolina

Department of Environment, Health and

Natural Resources, submitted revisions

to the North Carolina State

Implementation Plan (SIP). These

revisions include the adoption of three

source-specific volatile organic

compound rules; Subchapter 3D .0955,

Thread Bonding Manufacturing, .0956,

Glass Christmas Ornament

Manufacturing, and .0957 Commercial

Bakeries, the deleting of textile coating,

Christmas ornament manufacturing, and

bakeries from the list of sources that

must follow interim standards, the

defining of di-acetone alcohol as a nonphotochemically reactive solvent, and

the placement of statutory requirements

for adoption by reference for referenced

ASTM methods into a single rule rather

than each individual rule that references

ASTM methods.

Revisions to Subchapter 3D .1401–

.1415; Reasonably Available Control

Technology for Sources of Nitrogen

Oxides (Nox RACT); .1501–.1504

Transportation Conformity; and .1601–

.1603; General Conformity are being

addressed in separate Federal Register

documents.

In the final rules section of this

Federal Register, the EPA is approving

the State’s SIP revision as a direct final

rule without prior proposal because the

EPA views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: To be considered, comments

must be received by June 24, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Mr.

Randy Terry at the EPA Regional Office

listed below.

Copies of the documents relative to

this action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the following locations. The

interested persons wanting to examine

these documents should make an

appointment with the appropriate office

at least 24 hours before the visiting day.