alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JON M. SANDS

Federal Public Defender

J. LEONARDO COSTALES

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Louisiana State Bar# 35721

407 W. Congress, Suite 501

Tucson, AZ 85701-1355

Telephone: (520)879-7500

Attorney for Defendant

Leo_Costales@fd.org

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States Of America,

 Plaintiff,

v.

Anthony Delbert Jones, Jr.,

 Defendant.

CR18-0032-TUC-JAS (EJM)

MOTION TO CONTINUE

TRIAL AND ALL DATES

(No Hearing Requested)

(First Request)

Defendant, Anthony Delbert Jones, Jr., through counsel undersigned, requests a 60 

day continuance of the Plea Deadline set for March 2, 2018, and of the Trial set for March 

20, 2018. This request for continuance is made because additional time is needed for trial 

preparation, including, but not limited to, researching issues that are pertinent to the abovementioned case.

Angela Woolridge, Assistant U.S. Attorney, has indicated she has no 

objection to said request.

Case 4:18-cr-00032-JAS-EJM Document 15 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

It is expected that excludable delay under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161 

(h)(7)(A) will occur as a result of this motion or an order based thereon. This motion is 

made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: February 27, 2018.

JON M. SANDS 

Federal Public Defender

/s/ J. Leonardo Costales 

J. LEONARDO COSTALES

Assistant Federal Public Defender

I hereby certify that on the above date, I electronically transmitted the attached document 

to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of 

Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Angela W. Woolridge, AUSA

Case 4:18-cr-00032-JAS-EJM Document 15 Filed 02/27/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit10.9**THIRD AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT**     **THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT**(“Amendment”) is entered into asof the 27th day of October, 2005 (the “Effective Date”) by and between PatrickHenry Associates, L.P. (“Seller”) and Columbia Equity Trust, Inc. (“Purchaser”).**RECITALS**     A. Seller and Purchaser entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 5, 2005,as amended (collectively, the “Contract”), pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell toPurchaser, and Purchaser agreed to buy from Seller the Property (as defined in the Contract).     B. Seller and Purchaser have agreed to modify the terms of the Contract as set forth in thisAmendment.     C. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to themin the Contract.     NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are herebyacknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, Seller and Purchaser agree as follows:**AGREEMENTS**     1. Seller and Purchaser acknowledge receipt from GMAC Commercial Mortgage of a letter datedOctober 19, 2005 (the “GMAC Consent Letter”) consenting to the assumption by Purchaser of theExisting Mortgage subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the GMAC Consent Letter,including approval of the assumption by the Special Servicer of the loan and the DirectingCertficateholder (collectively, the “Special Servicer/DC Approval”). Purchaser hereby agrees touse commercially reasonable efforts to satisfy the conditions set forth in paragraphs 2, 5, 6, 7,8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the GMAC Consent Letter which are within its control in a timely manner.Seller and Purchaser hereby agree to extend the Outside Date to November 18, 2005 in order tosatisfy the other conditions set forth in the GMAC Consent Letter, including obtaining the SpecialServicer/DC Approval.     2. Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms of the Contract shall remainunchanged and in full force and effect.
 

 
          3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts all of which together shall constitute oneand the same instrument.          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have entered into this Amendment as of the date firstabove stated.          SELLER:                  PATRICK HENRY ASSOCIATES L.P.            By:  SAP IV Patrick Henry NF GP L.L.C.,     its sole general partner              By:  SAP IV manager, Inc.,       its manager            By:  /s/ Richard Wilpon                  Its:  Senior Executive Vice President                   PURCHASER:               COLUMBIA EQUITY TRUST, INC.,          a Maryland corporation            By:   /s/ Clinton D. Fisch                  Its:  Director of Acquisitions          
2
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Lee WETHERINGTON, Appellant.

No. WD 41429.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 12, 1989.

Randell K. Wood, Springfield, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and KENNEDY and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from conviction upon jury trial of manufacturing and having marijuana under his control, section 195.020, RSMo 1986, with sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 53 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 53

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 14, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 384) to reform the Troubled Assets Relief Program of the Secretary of 
the Treasury and ensure accountability under such Program. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 2 hours equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Financial Services. After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall 
rise without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order 
except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1241]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[ORDER NO. 798]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 
(Distribution Facility); Grove City, Ohio

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from the Rickenbacker Port Authority, 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 138, for authority to establish special-
purpose subzone status for the distribution facility of Pier 1 Imports, 
Inc., located in Grove City, Ohio, was filed by the Board on February 
8, 1995, and notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (FTZ Docket 4-95, 60 FR 9005, 2/16/95); and,
    Whereas, the Board has found that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby authorizes the establishment of a 
subzone (Subzone 138B) at the Pier 1 Imports, Inc., facility in Grove 
City, Ohio, at the location described in the application, subject to 
the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28. As 
indicated in the application, no processing or manufacturing will be 
conducted under zone procedures, including any such activity involving 
foreign textile products.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of January 1996.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1241 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13395]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2852]


Illinois; Declaration of Disaster Loan Area (Amendment #2)

    In accordance with notices from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency dated May 20, 1996, the above-numbered declaration is hereby 
amended to include Cass, Douglas, Jackson, Sangamon, White, and 
Williamson Counties in the State of Illinois as a disaster area due to 
damages caused by severe storms and flooding. This declaration is 
further amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning on April 28, 1996 and continuing through May 17, 1996.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed 
until the specified date at the previously designated location: Brown, 
Champaign, Christian, Coles, Edgar, Edwards, Gallatin, Johnson, Logan, 
Macon, Mason, Menard, Morgan, Moultrie, Piatt, Pope, Schuyler, Union, 
Vermilion, and Wayne Counties in Illinois; Perry County, Missouri; and 
Gibson and Posey Counties in Indiana.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is July 5, 1996, and for 
loans for economic injury the deadline is February 6, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-13395 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Sidney N. Zipser, Plaintiff, *v.*James G. Hardy, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

August 20, 1945.

*Sidney N. Zipser,*in person, and *John F. X. Finn*for Sidney *N.*Zipser, plaintiff.

*Theodore Kiendl, William R. Meagher*and *Cleveland C. Cory*for defendant.

Bernard Botein, J.

When married parties are living together, there is an implied authority in the wife, stemming from that marital relation, to order and receive necessaries at the husband’s expense. If, as claimed by the defendant, they are living apart as a result of the wife’s affirmative wrongdoing, a triable issue is raised as to whether the alleged destruction of that aspect of the marital status gave rise to the necessity of invoking the legal services which form the basis of this action. (See *Pearson*v. *Pearson,*230 N. Y. 141; *Damman*v. *Bancroft,*43 Misc. 678.) A wife may not charge her husband, under the guise of necessaries, with the expenses of repairing part of the ravages which followed directly in the wake of her wrongful acts. An issue of fact is also raised by the third defense, viz., that plaintiff’s services were rendered on the sole credit of the wife. *(Matter of Oppenheim,*178 Misc. 1026, and cases cited therein.) Plaintiff fails to set forth any facts as to the terms of his retention, if any, although this failure has been specifically challenged by the defendant.

Motion is in all respects denied, as is defendant’s application for a stay.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24948-24949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12413]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[COC-59104; CO-050-1430-01]


Notice of Realty Action; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action, proposed permit to authorize use of 
public lands in Gilpin County, Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A Permit under the authority of Section 302 of the Federal 
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2762; 43 U.S.C. 1732) 
(FLPMA) is being considered for short-term use of thirteen (13) small 
tracts of public land intermingled with municipal land developed as a 
parking lot. The Permit would allow the government to collect

[[Page 24949]]

fair market rental. The land and permittee are as follows:

6th Principal Meridian, Colorado

T. 3 S., R. 73 W.,
    Section 13: NW\1/4\ (13 tracts within).

    The scattered tracts, totalling approximately 6.79 acres, are 
located within a parking lot owned and operated by Central City, CO. 
The parking lot was developed for tourist and gaming visitor use at 
the famous Colorado mining town. The tracts would be offered 
noncompetitively to the city under a 3-year nonrenewable permit at 
no less than fair market rental. The Permit term would allow for the 
completion of the disposal procedure, at fair market value, to the 
City under the authority of Section 203 (sale) or 206 (exchange) of 
FLPMA. Additional tracts located within the above noted legal 
description may be included in the disposal. The general terms and 
conditions for permits are found in 43 CFR 2920.7. The City would be 
required to reimburse the United States for reasonable costs 
incurred in processing and monitoring the Permit, in accordance with 
43 CFR 2920.6.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Land Management, Canon City District, 3170 East 
Main Street, Canon City, Colorado 81212.

DATES: Interested parties may submit comments to the District Manager 
at the above address until July 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lindell Greer, Realty Specialist at 
(719) 269-8532.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any adverse comments will be evaluated by 
the State Director, and he may vacate, modify, or continue this realty 
action.
Stuart L. Freer,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-12413 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Alyssa Jones., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Riot Hospitality Group, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-17-04612-PHX-BSB

ORDER 

 On January 18, 2018, the Court issued an order granting a motion to seal. 

(Doc. 13.) Upon review of the order, 

IT IS ORDERED that the January 18, 2018 Order (Doc. 13) is amended as 

follows: 

 1. Line 1 on page 1 is amended to replace Plaintiff with Defendant. 

 2. Line 24 on page 1 is amended to replace Plaintiff’s with Defendant’s. 

 Dated this 18th day of January, 2018. 

 

Case 2:17-cv-04612-GMS Document 14 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                  ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


By signing below, the Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i)
this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 16th day of February 2005:



By: /s/ Paul Warkentin
--------------------------------
Paul Warkentin
President/CEO/Acting CFO
(Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Barbara Ann Dominey, Individually, and 

as Trustee of the Dominey Exempt Bypass 

Trust, the Dominey Non-Exempt Bypass 

Trust, the Dominey 2012 Irrevocable Trust 

f/b/o Elena Marquarita Dominey Langston, 

Teresa Eddinger, and Allison Allen, cotrustees of the Dominey Insurance Trust of 

1993, and Estate of Samuel Dominey Jr., 

 

 Appellants,

v.

Elena Marquarita Dominey Langston, 

Florence Olivia Dominey Campbell, and 

Matthew David Dominey, Beneficiaries of 

the Dominey 2012 Irrevocable Trust, the 

Dominey Exempt Bypass Trust, the 

Dominey Non-Exempt Bypass Trust, and 

the Dominey Insurance Trusts of 1993,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00187-CV

Appeal from the

278th District Court

of Walker County, Texas 

(TC# 2130121)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Appellants’ unopposed motion for extension of deadline to 

mediate. The motion is GRANTED. The Court extends the deadline to complete mediation until 

February 1, 2022. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MEDIATE THE 

CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT. Upon completion of mediation, the parties 

are directed to comply with the instructions set forth in our order of October 25, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5930 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require a clarification of the 

underlying authority for a rulemaking. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2023 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require a 

clarification of the underlying authority for a rulemaking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rulemaking Account5 ability and Reform Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING. 

7 Section 553 of title 5, United States Code is amend8 ed— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5930 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ‘‘including 

2 a complete recitation of each specific authority 

3 under law that grants the agency the power to en4 gage in the rule making, and for each provision of 

5 the proposed rule the specific authority or authori6 ties under law that grant the agency the power to 

7 promulgate the provision together with an expla8 nation of why the cited authority or authorities pro9 vide such power’’ after ‘‘proposed’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(e) FINAL RULE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY.— 

12 Every rule made final shall include a complete recitation 

13 of each specific authority under law that grants the agency 

14 the power to engage in the rule making, and for each pro15 vision of the proposed rule the specific authority or au16 thorities under law that grant the agency the power to 

17 promulgate the provision together with an explanation of 

18 why the cited authority or authorities provide such 

19 power.’’. 

20 SEC. 3. SCOPE OF REVIEW. 

21 Section 706(2) of title 5, United States Code is 

22 amended— 

23 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

24 the end; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5930 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period 

2 at the end and inserting a semicolon; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(G) in the case of a final agency rule, 

5 whenever the agency’s assertion of authorities 

6 pursuant to section 553(e) exceeds or does not 

7 reflect the powers and authorities in fact con8 fided to the agency by law; or 

9 ‘‘(H) in the case of an agency action or 

10 rule that claims the authority or power to re11 solve a major question, Congress has not pro12 vided a clear statement of such authority or 

13 power.’’. 

14 SEC. 4. APPLICATION. 

15 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on the 

16 effective date of this Act no rule may continue in effect 

17 to the extent that it was made in violation of the amend18 ments made by this Act, if such amendments were in ef19 fect on the date such rule was made. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATIONS
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kandi Technologies, Corp.
(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hu
Xiaoming, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Zhu
Xiaoying, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Hu XiaomingName:
            Hu
      XiaomingTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            May
      15, 2009/s/ Zhu XiaoyingName:
            Zhu
      XiaoyingTitle:
            Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            May
      15, 2009