alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


                            STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Charles C. Crosse, the registered owner of Stock Certificate # 105 for 23,437
shares issued by Let's Play Sports Inc. agrees to sell the stock to Let's Play
Sports Inc. at the issue price of $10.00 a share payable in monthly installments
of $5,000 beginning October, 1999. Monthly installments of $5,000 are payable in
one sum on the 15th of the month or in two installments of $2,500 payable on the
5th and 20th of each month at the option of Let's Play Sports Inc.

Each incremental sale of stock under Certificate #105 will be evidenced by an
executed Stock Assignment.

The terms of this agreement create an obligation to sell and an obligation to
purchase in accordance with the terms of this agreement.

In accordance with the terms of this agreement, each month a sale of 500 shares
takes place, and the seller will execute and deliver to purchaser a Stock
Assignment (Transfer Power). In the event that payment is not made within the
transaction period (Monthly - 30 days) it becomes a late installment payment
subject to interest or penalty.

This agreement provides for successors and assigns for both seller and
purchaser.

This agreement will remain in full force and effect until all of the shares of
Certificate #105 have been purchased and transferred.

Purchaser may at any time, without penalty, accelerate the installment purchase.



Seller                                         Purchaser

/s/ Charles C. Crosse                          /s/ Let's Play Sports, Inc.
Registered Owner                               T. Higginson, President

Date 10/22, 1999                               Date 22 Oct, 1999
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mark A. ARNOLD, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 66975.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 12, 1995.

John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of one count of second degree robbery (Count I), § 569.030, RSMo 1986, and two counts of assault of a law enforcement officer, third degree (Counts II and III), § 565.083, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to prison terms of eight years on Count I and one year each on Counts II and III. Counts II and III were concurrent to each other and concurrent to the sentence in Count I. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
#### Ronald Dean RITTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 52153.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 11, 1996.

Irene Earns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION BY ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Randy L. Elkins, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. (the“registrant”);  2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:June 13, 2007                                                  /s/ Randy L. Elkins   By: Randy L. Elkins   Title:  Controller and Acting Chief Financial Officer   
25
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION



I, Anthony N. DeMint,
certify that:



1. I have
		reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Tac Asset Corp.;
2. Based on
		my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
		of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
		the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
		statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
		by this report;
3. Based on
		my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
		included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
		the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
		small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
		annual report;
4. I am the
		sole officer and director and I am responsible for establishing and
		maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
		Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
		have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
> 				disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
> 				supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> 				small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
> 				is made known to me by others within those entities,
> 				particularly during the period in which this report is being
> 				prepared;
> 		Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer
> 				disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
> 				my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
> 				controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
> 				this report based on such evaluation; and
> 		Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
> 				during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
> 				(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
> 				of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
> 				reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. I have
		disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
		financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the
		small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
		equivalent functions):

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> 				design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
> 				which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
> 				business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
> 				report financial information; and
> 		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
> 				other employees who have a significant role in the small
> 				business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 7,
2005





/s/ Anthony N. DeMint_________

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief Accounting
Officer
Exhibit 10.1

                              CONSULTING AGREEMENT

         This Consulting Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into this 9th
day of April 2000 is by and amongst TrimFast Group, Inc. (the "Company") and
Peter Hobson (The "Consultant").

         WHEREAS, Consultant is skilled in providing legal
services, and has provided legal services to Company in the
past;
         WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue to engage Consultant to
continue to provide legal services and the Consultant is expected to be called
upon to handle an increase role in litigation strategy; and

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged it is agreed.

         1. The Company hereby engages the Consultant and the Consultant hereby
accepts this engagement on a non- exclusive basis pursuant to the terms and
conditions of this Consulting Agreement.

         2. Consultant shall handle defense litigation for the Company in
connection with product liability claims, breach of contract actions and such
other matters in the ordinary course of business.

         3. In consideration of the services to be provided, Consultant shall
receive a fee equal to 30,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

         4.  The Company will register these shares pursuant to
a registration statement on Form S-8.
         5. Except as otherwise provided herein, any notice or other
communication to any party pursuant to or relating to this Agreement and the
transactions provided for herein shall be deemed to have been given or delivered
when deposited in the United States Mail, registered or certified, and with
proper postage and registration or


<PAGE>



certification fees prepaid, addressed at their principal place of business or to
such other address as may be designated by either party in writing.

          6. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted pursuant to the
laws of the state of Florida. By entering into this Agreement, the parties agree
to the jurisdiction of the Florida courts with venue in Palm Beach, County
Florida. In the event of any breach of this Agreement, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover all costs including reasonable attorney's fees.

          7. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which when so executed an delivered shall be deemed an original, and it shall
not be necessary, in making proof of this Agreement to produce or account for
more than one counterpart.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed their hands an
seals the day and year first above written.

CONSULTANT:                               COMPANY:
                                      TRIMFAST GROUP, INC.

/S/PETER HOBSON                   BY: /S/MICHAEL MUZIO, PRES
---------------                   --------------------------
DISTRICT JUDGE'S CIVIL MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: David G. Campbell

Case Number: CV-17-04540-PHX-DGC

Date: November 5, 2020 

Merritt v. Arizona, State of et al

APPEARANCES: Plaintiff(s) Counsel Defendant(s) Counsel

David J. Don

Jason D. Lamm

Edward F. Novak

Jonathan Brinson

Melissa Ho

Andrew Fox

JURY TRIAL-DAY 7

8:34 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury is not present. Discussion is held regarding instructions. 8:58 a.m. 

Court is in recess. 

9:03 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury enters the courtroom. Cross-examination of Chief Bennie Click 

continues. 9:32 a.m. Redirect. 9:40 a.m. Witness excused. Dr. Phillip Lett is sworn and examined. 

10:25 a.m. Jury exits the courtroom. Discussion is held. 10:27 a.m. Court is in recess.

10:43 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury is not present. 10:51 a.m. Jury enters the courtroom. Crossexamination of Dr. Phillip Lett. 11:16 a.m. Redirect. 11:19 excused. Sidebar discussion is held. 11:28 

a.m. Leslie Merritt, Jr. is recalled. Witness is informed he is still under oath. Exhibit 213 is admitted 

and played to the jury. Jury is instructed prior to playing of the video. 11:38 a.m. Cross-examination. 

11:41 a.m. No redirect. Defense rests. 11:43 a.m. Jury is excused. 11:45 a.m. Court is in recess. 

12:48 p.m. Court reconvenes. Jury is present. Plaintiff recalls Commander Ed DeCastro. 12:51 p.m. 

Cross-examination. 12:51 p.m. No redirect. Witness is excused. Plaintiff rests. Final Jury Instructions 

are read to the jury. 1:21 p.m. Plaintiff’s closing arguments. 2:10 p.m. Court is in recess. 

2:31 p.m. Court reconvenes. Jury is present. Defendant’s closing arguments. 3:50 p.m. Court is in 

recess. 

4:01 p.m. Court reconvenes. Jury is present. Plaintiff’s rebuttal. 4:40 p.m. The bailiffs are sworn. 4:42 

p.m. Jury exits the courtroom. 4:42 p.m. Plaintiff makes a Rule 50 motion. The Court denies the 

motion. 4:55 p.m. Court is in recess and will reconvene for deliberations on November 6, 2020 at 9:00 

a.m. 

Deputy Clerk: Christine Boucher

Court Reporter: Patricia Lyons (am)/Linda Schroeder (pm) Start: 8:34 a.m.

Stop: 4:55 p.m. 

 Total: 6 hrs. 25 min.
Exhibit 99.2 A-2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devine Entertainment
Corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2007                       __________________________________
                                              Name:  Richard Mozer
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge 1

for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the reports and

recommendations of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States

Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 95-4223

___________

Shelby Harris, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

J. D. Kaver, Functional Unit * District Court for the

Manager; Phillip Higgins, * Western District of Missouri.

COII; John Sigler, Caseworker; *

Charles Kirsh, Assistant * [UNPUBLISHED]

Caseworker; Greg Mullarkey, *

COI; J. Pedro, COI; William *

Wade, Director of CMS; Cain, *

Nurse at CMCC, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 19, 1997

 Filed: March 20, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Shelby Harris, a Missouri prisoner, appeals from the grant of summary

judgment by the District Court in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C.

1

§ 1983 (1994) action. Having reviewed the record and
-2-

the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the judgment of the District Court

was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Additionally,

we deny Harris’s motion for legal materials.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6022

DEAN WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN M. PETTIFORD; LIEUTENANT SHAWNCE, Lieutenant SIS at FCIBennettsville; LIEUTENANT MILLER, Lieutenant at FCIBennettsville; DOCTOR RINCE, Doctor and Head Psychologist at

FCI-Bennettsville; D. BOWENS, Captain at FCI-Bennettsville;

DOCTOR BARROUS, Medical Director and FCI-Bennettsville,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.

(9:07-cv-00946-RBH)

Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008

Before MOTZ, KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Dean Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United

States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Dean Williams appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant

Williams’ motion to withdraw his requests for injunctive relief and

restraining orders, and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Williams v. Pettiford, No. 9:07-cv-00946-RBH

(D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13981]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 94C-0312]


ProMedica International; Withdrawal of Color Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to future filing, of a color additive 
petition (CAP 4C0244) proposing that the color additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of [phthalocyaninato(2-)] copper as 
a color additive in nonabsorbable polyvinylidene fluoride sutures 
intended for use in general and ophthalmic surgery.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mitchell A. Cheeseman, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-217), Food and Drug Administration, -
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3083.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of September 26, 1994 (59 FR 49074), FDA announced that a 
color additive petition (CAP 4C0244) had been filed by ProMedica 
International, 620 Newport Center Dr., suite 575, Newport Beach, CA 
92660. The petition proposed to amend the color additive regulations in 
Sec. 74.3045 [Phthalocyaninato (2-)] copper (21 CFR 74.3045) to provide 
for the safe use of [phthalocyaninato(-2)] copper as a color additive 
in nonabsorbable polyvinylidene fluoride sutures intended for use in 
general and opthalmic surgery. ProMedica International has now 
withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 
71.6(c)(2)).

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 96-13981 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
EXHIBIT
31. 1


CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





I,
Michael Bissonnette certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 of
AeroGrow International Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:  February
      13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Michael BissonnetteMichael
      BissonnetteChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)