alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George KRUPA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 757-88.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

April 26, 1989.

Rehearing Denied June 7, 1989.

David K. Wilson, Sherman, for appellant.

Stephen Davidchik, Co. Atty. & Jonathan H. Kamras, Asst. Co. Atty., Sherman, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for criminal mischief and assessed 5 years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed. *Krupa v. State,*750 S.W.2d 258 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising three grounds for review.

We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See *Sheffield v. State,*650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

*645TEAGUE, J., would grant, and MILLER, J., would grant grounds 2 and 3.
H. Res. 297 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 20, 2009. 

Whereas May 25, 2009, will be the 27th National Missing 

Children’s Day; 

Whereas National Missing Children’s Day honors our Nation’s obligation to locate and recover missing children by 

prompting parents, guardians, and other trusted-adult 

role models to make child safety an utmost priority; 

Whereas in the United States nearly 800,000 children are reported missing a year, more than 58,000 children are abducted by non-family members, and more than 2,000 

children are reported missing every day; 

Whereas Congress’s efforts to provide resources, training, 

and technical assistance has increased the capabilities of 

State and local law enforcement to find children and to 

return them home safely; 

Whereas the 1979 disappearance of 6-year-old Etan Patz 

served as the impetus for the creation of National Missing Children’s Day, first proclaimed in 1983; and 

Whereas Etan’s photo was distributed nationwide and appeared in media globally, and the powerful image came 

to represent the anguish of thousands of searching families: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
2 

•HRES 297 EH 

(1) recognizes National Missing Children’s Day and 

encourages all Americans to join together to plan events 

in communities across America to raise public awareness 

about the issue of missing children and the need to address this national problem, 

(2) recognizes that one of the most important tools 

for law enforcement to use in the case of a missing child 

is an up-to-date, good quality photograph and urges all 

parents and guardians to follow this important precaution, and 

(3) acknowledges that National Missing Children’s 

Day should remind Americans not to forget the children 

who are still missing and not to waver in the effort to 

reunite them with their families. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fortified Holdings
  Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
  30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, Steven Cooper, Interim Principal Executive Officer
  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: November 19, 2008 |     |                                          
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------
|                        | By: | /s/ Steven Cooper                        
|                        |     | Steven Cooper                            
|                        |     | Interim Principal Executive
      Officer

---
Klinger Advanced Aesthetics, Inc.

(formerly Advanced Aesthetics, Inc.)

501 Madison Avenue

New York, NY  10022

 

 

|   | June 21, 2006 |
|--------|---------------|

 

The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

The Johns Hopkins University

901 South Bend Street, Suite 550

Baltimore, MD 21231

 

|   | Re: | Services and Licensing Agreement |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------|

 

Gentlemen:

 

This letter will confirm our agreement to extend the period by which we are required to satisfy the “Conditions Precedent” pursuant to Section 5(b) of our Services and Licensing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated December 8, 2004, from June 30, 2006 until September 30, 2006.  All other terms and provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  

Please indicate your agreement by signing this letter below and returning a copy to us.

|   | Very truly yours, |
|--------|-------------------|

KLINGER ADVANCED AESTHETICS, INC.

By:   /s/ Andrew Lipman                              

|   | Name: Andrew Lipman          |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Title:          VP |  
AGREED:

 

THE JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION.

 

 

 

By:  

/s/        Richard A. Grossi                            

 

Name:  Richard A. Grossi

 
 

Title:  

VP/CFO - JHM

 
 

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

 

 

By:  

/s/        Richard A. Grossi                                      

 

Name:  Richard A. Grossi

 
 

Title:  

VP/CFO - JHM

 
 

 

 

  |
**Exhibit      32.2**

| (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                   |                                             |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:              February 16, 2007 | By:                          | /s/              Patrick A. Galliher   |
|                                  | Patrick                A. Galliher     |
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 62 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 62

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 15, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 384) to reform the Troubled Assets Relief Program of the 
Secretary of the Treasury and ensure accountability under such Program. No 
further general debate shall be in order. The bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. Notwithstanding 
clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be in order except those 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 
be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as 
read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 
amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in 
the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 
amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At 
the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
any amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  A motion to proceed under section 115 of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008--
     (a) shall be in order only if offered by the Majority Leader or his 
designee; and
    (b) may be offered even following the sixth day specified in subsection 
(d)(3) of such section but not later than the legislative day of January 22, 
2009.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2




MMC
ENERGY, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MMC Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Denis Gagnon, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MMC Energy, Inc. and will be retained by MMC Energy, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


August
      19, 2009/s/
      Denis GagnonDenis
      GagnonChief
      Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00247-CV

__________________

IN RE M.B.

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding 

418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-03-04129-CV

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Relator M.B. filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The relator is the maternal 

grandfather of the children in trial cause number 19-03-04129-CV, the underlying 

suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Relator seeks a writ compelling the trial 

judge to withdraw his order striking relator’s petition to intervene in the case. We 

note our jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 

22.221 (West Supp. 2018). 

Relator alleges that prejudice will result if the current trial setting occurs 

before the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved. The 
2

Court finds that temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It is 

ORDERED that the final trial in this case is STAYED until our Opinion issues or 

until further order of this Court. The Court denies the Relator’s request to stay all 

further proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relator 

as a condition to any of the relief herein granted.

The responses of the real parties in interest, L.M. and the Department of 

Family and Protective Services, are due August 23, 2019.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED IN PART.

ORDER ENTERED August 13, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
#### Deprece HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 71015.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 25, 1997.

Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for movant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case 2:18-cv-00042-DGC Document 1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:18-cv-00042-DGC Document 1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:18-cv-00042-DGC Document 1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:18-cv-00042-DGC Document 1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:18-cv-00042-DGC Document 1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1372]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA--00168; NAFTA--00168E]


Sara Lee Knit Products; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance on August 5, 1994, applicable to all workers of the several 
plants and facilities of the Sara Lee Knit Products, in Martinsville, 
Virginia.
    The certification was subsequently amended to cover workers at the 
subject firm locations Virginia and North Carolina. The notices were 
published in the Federal Register on March 10, 1995 (60 FR 13182), and 
October 2, 1995 (60 FR 51502), respectively.
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The Department is again 
amending the certification to cover the workers separated from the Sara 
Lee Knit Product production facility located in Eastman, Georgia. The 
workers produce T-shirts. The company reports that the plant closed 
November 16, 1995.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports from Mexico. 
The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-00168 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Sara Lee Knit Products plants located in 
Martinsville, Virginia (NAFTA-00168), and Eastman, Georgia (NAFTA-
00168E) who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after December 8, 1993 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under 
Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of December 1995.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-1372 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13721]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 40 and 48

[TD 8659]
RIN 1545-AR92


Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Excise Tax; Registration Requirements; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to final regulations [TD 
8659] which were published in the Federal Register for Thursday, March 
14, 1996 (61 FR 10450). The final regulations relate to the taxes on 
gasoline and diesel fuel reflecting and implementing certain changes 
made by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Boland (202) 622-3130 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are subject to these corrections are 
under sections 4081 and 4101 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, [TD 8659] contains errors that are in need of 
clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of final regulations which are the 
subject of FR Doc. 96-5586 is corrected as follows:


Sec. 48.4101-1   [Corrected]

    On page 10460, column 2, paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(D), lines 4 and 5 are 
corrected by merging the two lines to read ``paragraph (j) of this 
section, without regard to''.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 96-13721 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Avicena Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Belinda Tsao NivaggioliName:

Belinda Tsao NivaggioliTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

May 15, 2006/s/    Mike SullivanName:

Mike SullivanTitle:

Acting Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 15, 2006


This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27086-27087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13520]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Care Financing Administration
[HCFA-2552-96]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposal for the collection of information. Interested persons are 
invited to send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, including any of the 
following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed 
information collection for the proper performance of the agency's 
functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology to minimize the information collection 
burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: Revision of a currently 
approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Hospital and 
Hospital Health Care Complex Cost Report; Form No.: HCFA-2552-96; Use: 
This form is required by statute and regulation for participation in 
the Medicare program. The information is used to determine final 
payment for Medicare. Hospitals and related complexes are the main 
users. Frequency: Annually; Affected Public: Business or other for-
profit, Not-for profit institutions, and State, Local or Tribal 
Government; Number of Respondents: 7,000; Total Annual Responses: 
7,000; Total Annual Hours Requested: 4,599,000.
    To request copies of the proposed paperwork collections referenced 
above, E-mail your request, including your address, to 
P<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6504150017120a170e250d0603044b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d4c5d485f5a425f466d454e4b4c034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-
1326. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collections should be sent within 30 days of this notice directly to 
the OMB Desk Officer designated at the following address: OMB Human 
Resources and Housing Branch,

[[Page 27087]]

Attention: Allison Eydt, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Kathleen B. Larson,
Director, Management Planning and Analysis Staff, Office of Financial 
and Human Resources, Health Care Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-13520 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Joseph WICKERHAM, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67798.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 12, 1995.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael C. Kirkham, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of Rule 24.035 post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant entered guilty pleas to charges of robbery first degree and assault first degree. The trial court imposed consecutive fifteen year sentences on each charge.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are supported by the record and testimony of trial counsel which refuted movant’s allegations. Accordingly, they are not clearly erroneous. The judgment denying relief is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).