alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 350 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 23, 2009. 

Whereas Harry Kalas, an iconic and beloved sports broadcaster passed away on April 13, 2009; 

Whereas Harry Kalas was born on March 26, 1936, in 

Naperville, Illinois; 

Whereas Harry Kalas is a 1959 graduate of the University 

of Iowa with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Speech, Radio, 

and Television; 

Whereas immediately following graduation, Harry Kalas 

served in the United States Army for 2 years in Hawaii; 

Whereas following his service, Harry Kalas began his broadcasting career with KGU Radio broadcasting games for 

the University of Hawaii and the Hawaii Islanders of the 

AAA Pacific Coast League; 

Whereas Harry Kalas was a member of the original Houston 

Astros broadcast team in 1965; 

Whereas Harry Kalas joined the Philadelphia Phillies broadcast team in 1971, calling their games for the past 38 

years, including 26 years with his great friend and Hall 

of Famer Richie Ashburn; 

Whereas Harry Kalas had diverse talents, calling University 

of Houston football, Southwest Conference basketball, 
2 

•HRES 350 EH 

Big Five basketball, University of Notre Dame football, 

and NFL games, throughout his illustrious career as well 

as providing voice-overs for NFL films and numerous 

commercials; 

Whereas Harry Kalas broadcast the opening of the Astrodome, Veterans Stadium, and Citizen Bank Ballpark; 

Whereas in 2002, Harry Kalas was the Ford C. Frick Award 

Winner, named after the former National League President and Major League Baseball Commissioner, which is 

annually bestowed by the National Baseball Hall of Fame 

to a broadcaster for ‘‘major contributions to baseball’’; 

Whereas Harry Kalas called 7 National League Championship Series and 3 World Series, being the voice of the 

2008 World Champions; 

Whereas Harry Kalas called all of Hall of Famer Steve 

Carlton’s starts as a Phillie, as well as all of Hall of 

Famer Mike Schmidt’s 548 homeruns, making the 

phrase, ‘‘outta here’’, an often imitated but never duplicated signature home run call well known in Philadelphia 

and the rest of the baseball world; 

Whereas Harry Kalas was named Pennsylvania Sportscaster 

of the year 18 times and was inducted into the National 

Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association Hall of 

Fame in 2008; 

Whereas Harry Kalas was a remarkable husband to his wife, 

Eileen, and father to his three sons, Todd, Brad, and 

Kane; 

Whereas his son Todd followed him into the field of sports 

broadcasting; and 

Whereas Harry Kalas, not just as a voice, but also as a husband, father, friend, and veteran, will be sorely missed in 
3 

•HRES 350 EH 

both the Philadelphia region and the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

life and accomplishments of Harry Kalas for his invaluable 

contributions to the national pastime of baseball, the community, and the Nation. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 274 

Expressing support for designation of March as National Nutrition Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2009 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida (for herself and Mr. REICHERT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of March as National 

Nutrition Month. 

Whereas according to the American Dietetic Association good 

nutrition is vital to a healthy and long life; 

Whereas according to the American Dietetic Association the 

National Nutrition Month campaign focuses attention on 

the importance of making informed food choices and developing sound eating and physical activity habits; 

Whereas the first Nutrition Campaign was launched with a 

presidential proclamation in 1973 as National Nutrition 

Week; 

Whereas National Nutrition Week became National Nutrition 

Month in 1980; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 274 IH 

Whereas poor nutrition and sedentary lifestyles are linked to 

obesity and health problems; 

Whereas 17 percent of children between the ages of 6 and 11 

are overweight; 

Whereas 17.6 percent of adolescents between the ages of 12 

and 19 are overweight; 

Whereas 33.3 percent of adult men are obese and 35.3 percent of adult women are obese in the United States; 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control, since 

1980 obesity rates for adults have doubled and rates for 

children have tripled; 

Whereas dietary factors are associated with 4 of the 10 leading causes of death, including heart disease, cancer, 

stroke, and diabetes; 

Whereas these health conditions are estimated to cost the 

United States over $600,000,000,000 each year in medical expenses and lost productivity; 

Whereas access to proper nutrition helps fight off illness and 

disease and is vital to children’s cognitive development; 

Whereas poor nutrition, inactivity, and weight problems in 

school age children may cause low academic performance 

or behavioral problems resulting in additional costs; and 

Whereas March would be an appropriate month to designate 

as National Nutrition Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of National Nutri3 tion Month; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Nutrition Month; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 274 IH 

1 (3) encourages local communities to raise 

2 awareness surrounding nutritional health; 

3 (4) encourages awareness about diseases and 

4 death caused by lack of nutrition; and 

5 (5) recognizes and salutes health care profes6 sionals such as registered dietitians, that spread the 

7 knowledge and importance of nutrition each day. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Gladys E. Breese, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 33422.)

Court of Claims,

September 13, 1956.

*John H. Hamilton*for claimant.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Douglas S. Rider*and *David C. Quinn*of counsel), for defendant.

Richard S. Heller, J.

The claimant was the owner of approximately 35% acres of land on the south side of Colonial Boad in the town of Horseheads, Chemung County, New York. The plot had frontage on Colonial Boad of 1,610 feet and extended southerly on its west boundary 1,253 feet and joined (old) New York State Highway No. 17. The south boundary extends easterly along (old) New York State Highway No. 17 for 277.18 feet and goes in a northeasterly direction following the north line of the old Chemung Canal feeder.

*598The State has-appropriated 9.816 acres of land for the proposed new New York State Highway No. 17. This appropriation has cut the property into two sections with no immediate connection of the two parcels.

To the north of the appropriation, the parcel remaining is 7.18 acres and includes all of the ■ frontage on Colonial Road, with a depth to the south of 175 feet on the easterly boundary and 275 feet on the westerly boundary. This part of the claimant’s farm, together with the land appropriated, was the most valuable.

To the south of the appropriation, the parcel remaining is 18.56 acres, with a frontage of 277.18 feet on Route 17, and with a depth of 195 feet on the east and 718 feet on the west.

Claimant’s counsel has conscientiously approached the problem of lack of access to the south portion of 18.56 acres remaining from (old) Route 17. However, the court feels that while there is impairment from some previous taking, there is no lack of access. *(Stevens*v. *State of New York,*190 Misc. 727.)

The best available use of the land is for residential building purposes. The court feels that in addition to the taking of the land by the State there has been substantial damage to the remaining parcels.

In the opinion of the court, the reasonable value of all of claimant’s land south of Colonial Road prior to the taking was $26,920, and that the value after the taking was $15,170.

The claimant has been damaged in the amount of $11,750, with interest from December 2, 1953 to October 28, 1954, and from October 4,1955 to the date of entry of the judgment.

The claim has not been assigned.

The court has viewed the premises.

Submit findings.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

ANNA R. WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS

Arizona State Bar No. 029708

Assistant U.S. Attorney

United States Courthouse

405 W. Congress Street, Suite 4800

Tucson, Arizona 85701

Telephone: 520-620-7300

Email: anna.wright@usdoj.gov

nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren,

 Defendant.

Mag. No. 17-00341-RCC (JR)

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 100)

The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby 

respectfully moves the Court for a one-week extension of time to respond to the 

defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Based on Selective Enforcement and/or Prosecution and 

Renewed Motion for Discovery. Doc. 100. The government’s response is due on April 4, 

2019. In support of its motion, the government offers the following:

1. The defense previously lodged its motion along with a motion to exceed the page 

limits on March 21, 2019. Docs. 94, 95. The Court granted the motion to exceed 

the page limit on April 1, 2019. Doc. 99. The motion itself is 20 pages, but 

contains well over 100 pages of attached exhibits. Doc. 100.

2. Counsel for the government each had separate vacations and were out of the 

office for several days beginning on March 14, 2019.
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Counsel for the government require additional time to research the unique legal 

issues presented by the Motion to Dismiss.

Counsel for the defendant was contacted regarding a one-week extension of the 

government’s time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss and has no objection.

Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of April 2019.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

/s/ Anna R. Wright & Nathaniel J. Walters

ANNA WRIGHT &

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by other means this 3rd day of April 2019, to:

All ECF Participants
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Robert J. Zatta,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Rockwood Holdings, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006                              |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA                                 |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                      |
| Senior Vice  President and   Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 2:17-cr-01467-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/09/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01467-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/09/17 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01467-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/09/17 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01467-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/09/17 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01467-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/09/17 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)

PROMULGATED UNDER SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wayne T. Slomsky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 of DDi Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ WAYNE T. SLOMSKYWayne T. Slomsky Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer


Date: April 25, 2012
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
      RULE
      13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
      AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Seguso Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      Seguso, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      hereby certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Registrant.




SEGUSO
                HOLDINGS, INC.September
                9, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Robert SegusoRobert
                Seguso
              President,
                Chief Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal
              Financial
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Seguso Holdings, Inc. and will be retained
      by Seguso Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
AMENDMENT

                                       TO

           NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (DATED JUNE 20, 2000)

                                  June 29, 2001


     Section 2(a) of the Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement dated June 20,
2000 among YouthStream Media Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and James G. Lucchesi ("Executive"), is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

     "(a) This option shall be exercisable (to the extent vested) during the
continuance of the Executive's employment and shall be exercisable after
termination of the Executive's employment only as follows:

          (i) if the Executive's employment by the Company and its Affiliates is
terminated for any reason other than termination by the Company for cause (as
defined in the Employment Agreement) or termination by the Executive in breach
of the Employment Agreement, this option may be exercised by the Executive (or,
following the Executive's death, by the person or persons to whom his rights
under this option pass by will or by the laws of descent and distribution), to
the extent that it was exercisable at the date of termination of employment,
within twenty four months after the effective date of termination of employment,
but not later than the Termination Date; and

          (ii) if the Executive's employment is terminated by the Company for
cause or is terminated by the Executive in breach of the Employment Agreement,
this option and all rights under it, to the extent those rights have not been
exercised, shall thereupon terminate. The determination by the Company's board
of directors of the reason for termination of the Executive's employment shall
be binding and conclusive on the Executive."


                        YOUTHSTREAM MEDIA NETWORKS, INC.


                        By:      /s/ HARLAN D. PELTZ
                            -------------------------------
                        Name:
                        Title:


                              /s/ JAMES G. LUCCHESI
                        -----------------------------------
                        James G. Lucchesi
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Aaron Turner,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

John Nelson Schneider, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV17-4669 PHX DGC (CDB)

ORDER

Plaintiff, Michael Aaron Turner, filed a complaint, first amended complaint, and 

second amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Docs. 1, 5, 8) and motion for 

leave to proceed in this matter in forma pauperis on December 15, 2017 (Doc. 2). 

Plaintiff was released from custody at some point prior to December 11, 2018. On 

February 21, 2019, noting that Plaintiff had been released from custody, the Court 

ordered Plaintiff to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a non-prisoner application to 

proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs. Doc. 17. Plaintiff was warned 

that his failure to comply with the Order would result in this case being dismissed. Id. 

The Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff an additional extension of time to comply 

with the Court’s Order (Doc. 17) and allowed Plaintiff until April 25, 2019 to either pay 

the $350.00 filing fee or file a non-prisoner application to proceed in District Curt 

without prepaying fees or costs. Doc. 21. Plaintiff was again warned that his failure to 

comply with the Court’s Orders (Docs. 17, 21) would result in the dismissal of this case. 

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s orders. 

United States Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles has issued a report and 
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the second amended complaint be 

dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s orders. 

Doc. 22. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review 

the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 

140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The 

Court will accept the R&R and dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint without 

prejudice.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 22) is accepted.

2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(Docs. 8) is dismissed without prejudice.

3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on 

appeal are denied

4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.

Dated this 19th day of July, 2019.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Joseph Sorge, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Yelp Incorporated, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-04518-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Civil Procedure 

apply to all proceedings in this case. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, you must serve each Defendant in your case with the Summons and 

Complaint within 90 days from the date the Complaint is filed, unless you obtain a 

waiver of service pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). If, for good reason, 

you cannot serve your Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days, you may, 

prior to the expiration of the 90-day period, file with the Court a request for an extension 

of time in which to serve your Summons and Complaint. In that request, you should set 

forth the reason why you have not accomplished service and request a specific short 

period of time in which to accomplish such service on any Defendant. If the Court 

believes your reason constitutes “good cause” it will authorize a brief additional period in 

which you can then serve the Defendant. 

 If you do not obtain an extension and any Defendant named in your Complaint is 

not served within 90 days, the Court is obliged, after notice to you, to dismiss the 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Complaint without prejudice (meaning that your Complaint is dismissed but you may 

refile the Complaint in a new action if you wish to do so). 

The only way that the Court knows that you have served the Defendant is that, the 

person who serves the Defendant with the Summons and Complaint is required, 

according to the rules, to file an affidavit with the Court which proves that the Defendant 

was served in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). Therefore, you need to be sure that, 

prior to 90 days from the date on which you filed your Complaint, whoever serves the 

Summons and Complaint on each Defendant files an affidavit with this Court 

demonstrating that they accomplished proper service. 

THIS CONSTITUTES YOUR NOTICE UNDER RULE 4(m) THAT 

IF YOU HAVE NOT APPROPRIATELY SERVED ANY 

DEFENDANT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM THE FILING OF YOUR 

COMPLAINT THAT DEFENDANT WILL BE DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FROM YOUR LAWSUIT. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all

Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the 

time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on February 6, 2018. 

 Dated this 11th day of December, 2017. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge