alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13553]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1516-000]


SEMCOR, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 23, 1996.
    On April 8, 1996, SEMCOR, Inc. (SEMCOR) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which SEMCOR will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions as a marketer. SEMCOR also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, SEMCOR requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by SEMCOR.
    On May 8, 1996, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by SEMCOR should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, SEMCOR is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of SEMCOR's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 7, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96-13553 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp.
II (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Marlene Krauss, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Marlene Krauss, M.D.                              Dated: August 15, 2005
    --------------------------------
    Marlene Krauss, M.D.
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
```
Exhibit 21.1
 Significant Subsidiaries of Dynegy Inc.
 STATE ORCOUNTRY OFSUBSIDIARY
    
    INCORPORATION1.
    
    
    Dynegy Holdings Inc.
    
    Delaware2.
    
    
    Illinova Corporation
    
    Illinois3.
    
    
    DMT Holdings, Inc.
    
    Delaware4.
    
    
    Dynegy Falcon Holdings Inc.
    
    Delaware5.
    
    
    Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.
    
    Illinois6.
    
    
    Sithe Energies Inc.
    
    Delaware7.
    
    
    Dynegy Power Marketing Inc.
    
    Texas
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-109270 and No. 333-111495) ofSohu.com Inc. of our report dated April 19, 2005 relating to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sohu.com Inc.,included in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs LimitedCompany 

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China 

April19, 2005
EXHIBIT
31. 1


CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





I, Jervis
B. Perkins certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 of AeroGrow
International Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting.






Date:  August
      7, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Jervis B.
      PerkinsJervis
      B. PerkinsChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 428 

Recognizing the immeasurable contributions of fathers in the healthy development of children, supporting responsible fatherhood, and encouraging 

greater involvement of fathers in the lives of their children, especially 

on Father’s Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2009 

Mr. MCINTYRE (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. FORBES, Mr. 

GOHMERT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. KANJORSKI, Ms. RICHARDSON, Ms. FOXX, 

Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. PITTS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Mr. 

REHBERG) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the immeasurable contributions of fathers in 

the healthy development of children, supporting responsible fatherhood, and encouraging greater involvement 

of fathers in the lives of their children, especially on 

Father’s Day. 

Whereas fathers factor significantly in the lives of children; 

Whereas fathers play an important role in teaching their children life lessons and preparing them to succeed in school 

and in life; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 428 IH 

Whereas children with involved fathers are more likely to do 

well in school, have a better sense of well-being, and have 

fewer behavioral problems; 

Whereas supportive fathers promote the positive physical, social, emotional, moral, and mental development of children; 

Whereas promoting responsible fatherhood can help increase 

the chances that children will grow up with two caring 

parents; 

Whereas, when fathers are actively involved in the upbringing 

of children, the children demonstrate greater self-control 

and a greater ability to take initiative; 

Whereas responsible fatherhood can help reduce child poverty; 

Whereas responsible fatherhood strengthens families and 

communities; and 

Whereas Father’s Day is the third Sunday in June: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the millions of fathers who serve 

3 as a wonderful, caring parent for their children; 

4 (2) calls on fathers across the United States to 

5 use Father’s Day to reconnect and rededicate them6 selves to their children’s lives, to spend Father’s Day 

7 with their children, and to express their love and 

8 support for their children; 

9 (3) urges men to understand the level of re10 sponsibility fathering a child requires, especially in 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 428 IH 

1 the encouragement of the mental, moral, social, aca2 demic, emotional, physical, and spiritual develop3 ment of children; and 

4 (4) encourages active involvement of fathers in 

5 the rearing and development of their children, in6 cluding the devotion of time, energy, and resources. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determi ned that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE U NI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41012 C onfer enc e Cal endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. RODRI GO M ENDOZA D e fe nda nt

- Appe l l ant

A pp eal f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 2: 08- C R

- 347- 1

B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d JO L L Yan d E L R O D , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder al Pu bl i c D ef ender appoi nt ed t o r epr es ent R odr i go M endoz a has
m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lif o rn ia , 38 6 U

. S. 73 8 ( 19 67 )

. M e ndo z a has no t f i l e d a r e s po ns e . O ur i nde pe nde nt r e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo r a p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo r le a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D

. S ee 5 T H C IR
. R. 42. 2. United States Court of A pp eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 Date: February 26, 2009
    By:
    /s/    HOLLI C. NICHOLSHolli C. NicholsExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
#### George D. KARAGIANNIS, Respondent, v. Maria A. KARAGIANNIS, Appellant.

No. 68491.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 21, 1996.

Francis L. Kenney, II, Witzel, Kearns & Kenney, St. Louis, for appellant.

Thomas Andrew Spoon, Pulos, Blankenship & Jiawakorlos, Crestwood, for respondent.

Before GERALD M. SMITH, P. J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Maria A Karagiannis, appeals the judgment and decree of dissolution entered in St. Louis County Circuit Court. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM JASON TEETS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-141 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 27, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Gary R. Gossett, Jr., Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jason M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-76761) of Corporate Property Associates 14
Incorporated and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 23, 2001 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 23, 2001
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
        March 27, 2001


                                     -37-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Albert Yazzie, Jr.,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-08006-01-PCT-GMS

DETENTION ORDER

On February 23, 2021, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released 

on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 23rd day of February, 2021.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:18-cr-08006-GMS Document 69 Filed 02/23/21 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Thomas A. Zlaket, SBA # 001819

THOMAS A. ZLAKET, P.L.L.C.

310 South Williams Boulevard, Suite 170

Tucson, Arizona 85711-4446

Phone: (520) 750-0250

Fax: (520) 750-0243

Email: tom@zlaketlaw.com

Attorney for Nonparty Movants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v.

WYO TECH Investment Group, LLC; CWT 

Canada II Limited Partnership; Resources 

Recovery Corporation; and Jean Noelting,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:17-CV-04140-DWL

NOTICE OF ERRATA RE: MOTION 

FOR RECUSAL

OF ASSIGNED JUDGE

Nonparty movants John F. Rasor, Scott Duncan, Mike Wilhelm, Tom Burgess, Scott Lane, 

Meredith Lane, Ryan McDonough, Tim Orscheln, Lewis Henkind, Mike Spaulding, Ron Ellis, 

Annie Ellis, Janet Stephens, and Clayton Stephens (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 

“Subpoenaed Individuals”) hereby submit this Notice of Errata regarding their Motion for Recusal 

of the judge assigned to this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. §455, in order to correct a 

misstatement in their Motion. The Subpoenaed Individuals mistakenly stated that a “New York 

court inexplicably allowed the CWT Parties to issue a Restraining Notice to Wells Fargo, freezing 

the Wyo Tech account over Wyo Tech’s adamant objections.” This was an incorrect statement. 

Movants have since learned that the CWT Parties’ attorneys issued the Restraining Notice without 

any court approval whatsoever, based solely on the attorneys’ unfounded assertions, conjecture 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 207 Filed 08/26/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

and speculations.

With that correction, Movants renew their request that this Court immediately recuse itself 

based on §28 U.S.C.A. 433(b)(3).

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 26

th day of August 2019.

THOMAS A. ZLAKET, P.L.L.C.

/s/ Thomas A. Zlaket

Thomas A. Zlaket, Esq.

310 South Williams Boulevard, Suite 170

Tucson, Arizona 85711-4446

Email: tom@zlaketlaw.com

Attorney for Nonparty Movants

ORIGINAL electronically filed August 26, 2019.

COPY served via CM/ECF System, which 

sends notification to all parties registered 

therein this 26

th day of August 2019.

 /s/

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 207 Filed 08/26/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Administration
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 12, 2010
    /s/ Christopher P. LoweChristopher P. LoweChief Financial Officer and
Vice President of Administration 51