alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25936-25937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12990]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service
[Dept. Cir. 570, 1995--Rev., Supp. No. 15]


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds; Change of Name; 
Prudential Reinsurance Co.

    Prudential Reinsurance Company, a Delaware corporation, has 
formally changed its name to Everest Reinsurance Company, effective 
April 2, 1996. The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on 
Federal bonds at 60 FR 34446, June 30, 1995.
    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal 
bonds, dated today, is hereby issued under sections 9304 to 9308 to 
Title 31 of the United States Code, to Everest Reinsurance Company, 
Dover, Delaware. This new certificate replaces the Certificate of 
Authority issued to the Company under its former name. The underwriting 
limitation of $44,245,000 established for the Company as of July 1, 
1995, remains unchanged until June 30, 1996.
    Cerificates of Authority expire on June 30, each year, unless 
revoked prior to that dated. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as

[[Page 25937]]

long as the Company remains qualified (31 CFR part 223). A list of 
qualified companies is published annually as of July 1, in the 
Department Circular 570, which outlines details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate 
their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 1995 Revision, at 
page 34446 to reflect this change.
    The Circular may be viewed or downloaded by calling the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, computerized 
public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 874-6817/7034/
6953/6872. A hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing 
Office (GPO), Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-0132. When ordering 
the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00489-0.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury. Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F04, Hyattsville, MD 20782, telephone (202) 874-6765.

    Dated: May 15, 1996.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 96-12990 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 552 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 552

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 17, 2009.
    Resolved, That during further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2847) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and 
Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other 
purposes, no further general debate shall be in order. Notwithstanding clause 11 
of rule XVIII and House Resolution 544, and except as provided in section 2, no 
further amendment shall be in order except: (1) amendments numbered 3, 6, 19, 
22, 25, 31, 35, 41, 59, 60, 62, 63, 69, 71, 93, 96, 97, 98, 100, 102, 111, 114, 
and 118 printed in the Congressional Record of June 15, 2009, pursuant to clause 
8 of rule XVIII, which may be offered only by the Member who submitted it for 
printing or a designee, and (2) not to exceed 10 of the following amendments if 
offered by the ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations or his 
designee: amendments numbered 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 
88, 89, 90, 91, 104, 105, 106, 107, and 108 printed in the Congressional Record 
of June 15, 2009, pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII. Each amendment listed in 
this section shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 10 minutes 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived 
except that an amendment may be offered only at the appropriate point in the 
reading. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  The chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations or their designees each may offer one pro forma amendment to the 
bill for the purpose of debate. Such amendment may be repeated, but only after 
consideration of an amendment listed in the first section of this resolution.
    Sec. 3.  The Chair may entertain a motion that the Committee rise only if 
offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee. The 
Chair may not entertain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the bill 
(as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Sangui Biotech International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Striepe, Chief Executive Officer and, I, Joachim Fleing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Thomas Striepe __________________________________________ By: Thomas Striepe Chief Executive Officer Principal Executive Officer  Dated: October 5, 2012     /s/ Joachim Fleing __________________________________________ By: Joachim Fleing Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial Officer  Dated: October 5, 2012   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Signet International Holdings, Inc. for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2005, I, Ernest Letiziano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Signet International Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Signet International Holdings Inc. 

 
| Dated: September 12, 2005 |
|---------------------------|

 

**SIGNET INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Ernest Letiziano*Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.6



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. II

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City
Florida Holding Co. II (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 3, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Short, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 15, 2005



By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. SHORTMichael J. ShortPrincipal Financial Officer




35
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert deRose, Chief Executive Officer of Education Lending Group, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    Robert deRose                              
|                     |  |     |  | Name: Robert deRose Title: Chief Executive
Officer
H. Res. 544 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 16, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2847) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related 

Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 

order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with 

clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 

of rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be in order ex-
2 

•HRES 544 EH 

cept: (1) those received for printing in the portion of the Congressional Record of June 15, 2009 (or earlier) designated 

for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII; and (2) pro forma 

amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so 

received may be offered only by the Member who submitted 

it for printing or a designee and shall be considered as read 

if printed. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to 

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 

instructions. 

SEC. 2. Clause 9(b)(2) of rule XXI is amended by inserting ‘‘such’’ after ‘‘no’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit No. 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Vincent Beatty, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DataMill Media Corp. (f/k/a Smitten Press: Local Lore and Legends, Inc.);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: September 27, 2010
 
 By  /s/ VINCENT BEATTY
 Vincent Beatty, Director
 (Acting as Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7581** 

WAYNE BOYD , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. MARIE VARGO, Warden, Sussex II State Prison , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01501

- LO

- IDD )

Submitted : February 27, 2014 Decided: March 11, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Wayne Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CU RIAM: Wayne Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating t hat reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independent ly reviewed the record and conclude that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l egal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bruce Woodruff KURT, Appellant.

No. 64360.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Dec. 21, 1993.

Bruce Woodruff Kurt, pro se.

Robert P. McCulloch, Pros. Atty., St. Louis County, Clayton, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and SIMON and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Bruce Woodruff Kurt, appeals from his misdemeanor conviction of driving while his license was suspended, entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to one year imprisonment in the county jail and a $50.00 fine. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant originally filed his appeal with the Missouri Supreme Court. The appeal *676was transferred to this court where proper jurisdiction was vested.

Our review of appellant’s brief establishes an abundance of egregious violations of Rule 84.04(a), (c), (d), and (e). Appellant fails to include Points Relied On, fails to include a list of authorities, and fails to provide “a fair and concise statement of facts” as required by Rule 84.04. We find that appellant has preserved nothing for this court to review. *See Jones v. Jones,*819 S.W.2d 773, 774 (Mo.App., E.D.1991); *Wehmeyer v. Bassett Realty, Inc.,*840 S.W.2d 290, 291 (Mo.App., S.D.1992). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
**CERTIFICATIONS**


**EXHIBIT
      31.1/31.2**


****I,
      Clifford Chapman, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International Cellular
      Accessories.





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have;




(a) 
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) 
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly
      report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  I
      have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):




(a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date: May
              18,
              2006
            
            /s/ Clifford
              ChapmanClifford
              ChapmanPrincipal
              Executive and Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00476-CR

Michael LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR1981

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on August 13, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of August, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Scott Daniel Warren,

Defendant.

17-mj-00341-TUC-RCC (JR)

AMENDED ORDER 

On motion of the United States of America, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED Granting the Motion to Dismiss Information (Doc. 156). The 

Information against defendant, Scott Daniel Warren, is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated this 4th day of March, 2020.

Case 4:17-mj-00341-RCC-JR Document 161 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 1