alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1265]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board FFRDC and UARC Independent Advisory Task 
Force
ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board FFRDC & UARC Independent Advisory 
Task Force will meet as follows: on January 31, 1996 at The Aerospace 
Corporation, 2350 East El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, California, in 
Open session from 0800-1200 and in Closed session from 1300-1600; and 
on February 1, 1996 at the RAND Corporation, 1700 Main Street, Santa 
Monica, California, in Open session from 0800-1200 and in Closed 
session from 1300-1600.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At the closed portions of 
this meeting the Task Force will receive classified plant tours and 
briefings. For further information or if you would like to attend the 
open sessions, contact the DSB Secretariat at (703) 695-4157.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c) (1) (1988), and that accordingly 
portions of this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: January 22, 1996.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-1265 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James SMALLEY a/k/a James Cobb, Appellant. James SMALLEY a/k/a James Cobb, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 59887, 62044.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 16, 1993.

Jeannie Arterburn, S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*644Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A consolidated appeal. Defendant was charged by indictment with delivering cocaine in violation of § 195.211, RSMo (Supp.1992). He appeals his conviction and twelve-year sentence and the denial, after a hearing, of his 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.25(b). The judgment was supported by substantial evidence and no error of law appears; the motion court’s findings were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only.
#### PARAGON GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Linda PUTNAM, d/b/a Linda’s Diamond House, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Third-Party Defendant/Respondent.

No. 65585.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Sept. 16, 1994.

Raymond Howard, Howard Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant.

Edward S. Meyer, Stephen E. Winbom, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent Burns Intern. ■ Security Services, Inc.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRIST and CRANDALL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Linda Putnam, brought what is denominated as a third-party action against Burns International Security Services, Inc. Defendant appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Burns following the dismissal of the underlying action.

No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13465]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Image-Based Automatic Target 
Recognition; Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Image-Based Automatic 
Target Recognition will meet in closed session on July 10-12, 1996 at 
Science Applications International Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will assess the ability of automatic/aided target recognition 
technology and systems to support important military missions, 
principally in the near- and mid-term. The Task Force should 
concentrate on those technologies and systems that use imagery (EO, IR 
or radar) as their primary input medium.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II (1996)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1996), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: May 23, 1996.
Patricial L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-13465 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jay Sargeant, Chief Exectuive Officer of EYI Industries, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and to which this
certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


/s/Jay Sargeant
April 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will
be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
in such filing.
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joshua W. Carden, SBN 021698

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

16427 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 410 

Scottsdale, AZ 85254

joshua@cardenlawfirm.com

(480) 454-1100 

(480) 454-1101 (Fax)

Attorney for Plaintiff

L. Eric Dowell, SBN 011458

Alexandra J. Gill, SBN 027506

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., SBN 00504800

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone: (602) 778-3700

Fax: (602) 778-3750

Eric.Dowell@OgletreeDeakins.com

Alexandra.Gill@OgletreeDeakins.com

Attorneys for Defendant Yelp Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joseph Sorge, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Yelp, Inc.,

Defendant.

No. 2:17-CV-04518-SMM

STIPULATION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Come now the parties in the above listed matter and, pursuant to LRCiv. 7.3, stipulate to 

extend the time for Plaintiff to file his Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

and related supporting documents from Monday, February 11, 2019 to Monday, February 25, 

2019. Counsel for Plaintiff has been moving both home and office since the middle of January and 

has only just completed that process this past weekend, just in time for three depositions this week 

in two separate matters. Counsel for Defendant has graciously agreed to this short extension, 

which is not for purposes of delay but so that justice may be done. 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted this 7th day of February, 2019,

JOSHUA CARDEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: s/Joshua W. Carden

Joshua W. Carden

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

By: s/L. Eric Dowell (with permission)

L. Eric Dowell

Alexandra J. Gill

Attorneys for Defendant Yelp Inc.

I certify that the content of this 

document is acceptable to all 

persons required to sign the 

document and that authorization to 

electronically sign this document 

has been obtained.

By: s/Joshua W. Carden
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the 7th day of February, 2019, I electronically transmitted a PDF version 

of this document to the Office of the Clerk of the Court, using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants listed for this 

matter:

L. Eric Dowell

Alexandra J. Gill

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Attorneys for Defendant Yelp Inc.

/s/Joshua W. Carden

33568189.1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: July 31, 2007
    
    /s/ Vincent R. Volpe Jr.Vincent R. Volpe Jr.President, Chief Executive Officer andDirector
 Page 35 of 37
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of New Century Resources Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, George Christodoulou, President, Treasurer, Director, CEO, and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ George Christodoulou George Christodoulou Principal Executive and Principal Accounting Officer  March 30, 2017
**Exhibit 10.42**

 

**INTERCOMPANYSERVICES EXTENSION AGREEMENT**

** **

This Extension Agreement dated as of January 1,2006 is by and between Hallmark Cards, Incorporated (“Hallmark”) and CrownMedia Holdings, Inc. (Crown Holdings”).

 

WHEREAS, Crown Holdings and Hallmark have previouslyentered into that certain Intercompany Services Agreement between the partiesdated as of December 23, 2002 (the “Services Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to further extend the termof the Services Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, Crown Holdings and Hallmark herebyagree as follows:

 

The term of the License Agreement shall be extendedfor an additional period terminating on January 1, 2007, subject to anyearlier termination pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement.

 

All other terms and conditions of the ServicesAgreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executedthis Extension Agreement as of the date set forth above.

 

 
| HALLMARK  CARDS, INCORPORATED   |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |
|                            |
| By:                             | /s/  Brian Gardner |   |
|                            |   |   |
| Title:                          | Exec.  V.P. |   |
|                            |   |   |
|                            |   |   |
| CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. |   |
|                            |   |
| By:                             | /s/  Charles Stanford |   |
|                            |   |   |
| Title:                          | Exec.  Vice President |   |
|                                 |  |  |  |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Sarah Bernard, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

December 12, 1955.

*McLaughlin, Russell, Bullock & Lark*for trustee, petitioner.

*Angelo J. Cincotta*for Esther Bernard, respondent.

*Stroock & Stroock & Lavan*for Montefiore Hospital for Chronic Diseases, respondent.

*Emanuel Schwarts,*special guardian for Jane Stein and another, infants, respondents.

William T. Collins, S.

In connection with its first intermediate accounting the trustee requests a construction of the language used in the will in determining the proper allocation of two certain stock dividends. Testatrix died in 1948. In paragraph Tenth of her will she stated: *11*All stock or extraordinary cash dividends and the value of all rights to subscribe to new securities of any corporation in which my said estate is interested shall be considered income. ’ ’

On May 1, 1954 the trustee received 200 shares of American Can Company common stock and on December 1,1954 it received 100 shares of Standard Oil Company (Indiana) capital stock as distributions. The special guardian for infant contingent income beneficiaries and remaindermen of the residuary trust concedes that the American Can Company dividend was a stock dividend within the meaning of paragraph Tenth of the will and should be paid to the income beneficiary. However, he contends that as part of the assets used in the stock distribution by the Standard Oil Company represented a transfer from the *32*“*Capital in Excess of Par Value *”*account to the capital stock account, that portion should be added to the principal of the trust.

The court holds that this distribution by the Standard Oil Company was a stock dividend *(Matter of Lawrie,*119 N. Y. S. 2d 906). See, also, *Matter of Chapman*(208 Misc. 390) where the same stock dividend was considered. Since the testatrix used language which frees her will from the application of section 17-a of the Personal Property Law *(Matter of Lloyd,*292 N. Y. 280; *Equitable Trust Co.*v. *Prentice,*250 N. Y. 1; *Matter of Lawrie,*supra) this stock dividend must be considered wholly as income.

Submit decree on notice construing the will and settling the account accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 11, 2009                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA                          |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                    |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Herbert L. Levy, Respondent, *v.*Jack Jacobs, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 15, 1955.

*Gilbert S. Rosenthal*and *Martin Harris*for appellant.

*Abraham Sher*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiff as assignee acquired no greater rights herein than his assignor, and in view of the fact that there was no debt due from the defendant to plaintiff’s assignor, there was no debt due from defendant to plaintiff. The record further discloses that plaintiff failed to prove that there existed a relationship of attorney and client between him and defendant but that plaintiff was acting as “of counsel ” for defendant’s attorney of record. Therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover from the defendant for services allegedly rendered by him to the defendant.

The judgment should, therefore, be reversed, with costs and the complaint dismissed.

Hofstadter, Eder and Hecht, Jr., JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended  September 30, 2006 (the "Report") of Parke Bancorp,  Inc. (the "Company")
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission,  we, Vito S.  Pantilione,
President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Ernest D.  Huggard,  Senior  Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Bank.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                             <C>

/s/Vito S. Pantilione                                /s/Ernest D. Huggard
-------------------------------------                -------------------------------------------------
Vito S. Pantilione                                   Ernest D. Huggard
President and Chief Executive Officer                Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

</TABLE>

November 14, 2006
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, JOHN S. THOMSON, Acting/Interim Chief Financial
Officer of KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC. (the Corporation), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Corporation, for
      the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 4 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Corporation.                                                                                                                                               



| | By:    | (signed) John S. Thomson      
| | ------ | ------------------------------
| |        |                               
| | Name:  | JOHN S. THOMSON               
| |        |                               
| | Title: | Acting Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                               
| | Date:  | September 13, 2006            

---
|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended      September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended;      and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |                                       |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      November 9, 2009 | By:    | /s/ David      S. Boone               |   |
|                         |   | David      S. Boone                        |   |
|                         |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

|   |   |                           |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Steven      J. Armond |   |
|   |   | Steven      J. Armond          |   |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer   |   |

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAmerican CareSource Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by American CareSourceHoldings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission uponrequest.