alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 1, 2015

No. 04-15-00539-CV

IN RE TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES, LLC 

and Luquita Joy

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On August 31, 2015, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

emergency relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus 

relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and 

the real party in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this 

court no later than September 15, 2015. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relators’ request for emergency relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s August 21, 2015 

order authorizing the oral deposition of Luquita Joy to occur not later than September 4, 2015, is 

TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on September 1, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CI-09313, styled In re Fernando Ozuna, pending in the 285th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ John Karlsson


John Karlsson


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


April 14, 2010











A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13374]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Sickle 
Cell Disease Advisory Committee, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, June 7, 1996, which was published in the Federal Register on 
April 24, 1996 (61 FR 18397).
    The meeting date is changed to July 22, 1996 at 8:30 a.m. The 
meeting will be held at the National Institutes of Health, Two 
Rockledge Center, Room 9A, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland. As 
previously advertised, the meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13374 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Robert BAREHILL, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 770-89.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

March 28, 1990.

*723Douglas M. O’Brien, Houston (court-appointed on appeal), for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Kathlyn Giannaula and Catherine Bertrand, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery, enhanced, and assessed punishment at 12 years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed in an unpublished opinion. *Barehill v. State,*1987 WL 17344 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st], No. 1-86-723-CR, delivered September 24, 1987). Appellant petitioned this Court for review claiming that the Court of Appeals erred in holding Art. 37.07, Sec. 4, V.A.C.C.P., constitutional. This Court remanded the case in an unpublished opinion for proceedings consistent with *Rose v. State,*752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1988). *Barehill v. State*(Tex.Cr.App. No. 1203-87, delivered November 23, 1988). On remand, the Court of Appeals found that although the parole instruction was unconstitutional, appellant was not harmed by submission of the instruction to the jury 782 S.W.2d 506. Appellant filed a second petition claiming that he was harmed.

We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. The petition for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, however, refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See *Sheffield v. State,*650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). Moreover, harm determinations relevant to submission of the unconstitutional parole statute are now governed by this Court’s opinion in *Arnold v. State,*784 S.W.2d 372 (Tex.Cr.App.1990).

With this understanding, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

McCORMICK, P.J., concurs in the result.

TEAGUE, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 53 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                   House Calendar No. 2
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 53

                           [Report No. 111-2]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 384) to reform the 
  Troubled Assets Relief Program of the Secretary of the Treasury and 
               ensure accountability under such Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2009

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 384) to reform the 
  Troubled Assets Relief Program of the Secretary of the Treasury and 
               ensure accountability under such Program.

    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution 
the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the 
House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 384) to reform the 
Troubled Assets Relief Program of the Secretary of the Treasury and 
ensure accountability under such Program. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI. 
General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 2 
hours equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Financial Services. After general debate, 
the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No further 
consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a 
subsequent order of the House.
                                                   House Calendar No. 2

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 53

                           [Report No. 111-2]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 384) to reform the 
  Troubled Assets Relief Program of the Secretary of the Treasury and 
               ensure accountability under such Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 13, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
H. Res. 445 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 14, 2009. 

Whereas Orville and Wilbur Wright secured the patent for 

their powered airplane in 1906, affording them the opportunity to compete for contracts with the Army; 

Whereas the United States Army Signal Corps made its first 

purchase of an airplane, the Wright Military Flyer, in 

1909 at a cost of $30,000; 

Whereas the Wright Military Flyer carried a passenger over 

a distance of 125 miles; 

Whereas today’s military aircraft can travel around the world 

without landing; 

Whereas the importance of military aviation and air superiority in battle was first demonstrated in World War I; 

Whereas, during World War II, United States Naval aviation 

was decisive in reversing the Japanese advance and winning the war in the Pacific; 

Whereas United States Army Air Corps played a crucial role 

in executing strategic bombing campaigns in both the 

European and Pacific theaters; 

Whereas the National Security Act of 1947 established the 

United States Army Air Corps as a separate military 

branch, the United States Air Force; 
2 

•HRES 445 EH 

Whereas the Vietnam War brought about new, more modern 

fighter jets and bombers, including the F–105 

Thunderchief and the F–4 Phantom; 

Whereas military aviators continue to provide invaluable offensive, defensive, logistical, and intelligence support to 

the Armed Forces; 

Whereas military aviators have been on the front lines of 

combat and humanitarian missions in Iraq and Afghanistan; 

Whereas the increase in technology over the last century has 

made military aircraft an essential component in the 

safety and security of the United States homeland; and 

Whereas the National Air and Space Museum of the Smithsonian Institution will commemorate the centennial of military aviation with programs and exhibits throughout 

2009: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

100 years of military aviation and expresses its continued 

support for military aviators of the United States Armed 

Forces. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANA FEWELL, Individually and as

Successor in Interest to Weldon Patterson

Fewell, deceased; et al.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55536

D.C. No. 

2:16-cv-01934-DSF-JEM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 7, 2018

Pasadena, California

Before: HAWKINS and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and HOYT,** District Judge.

FILED

SEP 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for

summary judgment. The parties are familiar with the facts so we do not repeat

them here. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. Officer Sanchez did not violate Fewell’s Fourth Amendment right

because plaintiffs did not show that Officer Sanchez’s conduct was objectively

unreasonable. See Wilkinson v. Torres, 610 F.3d 546, 551 (9th Cir. 2010). Officer

Sanchez was positioned near the rearward path of the truck and could hear the

engine revving at high speeds. When the truck gained traction, Officer Sanchez

perceived an imminent threat; his fear and his use of force were objectively

reasonable. Therefore, Officer Sanchez is entitled to summary judgment on

plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim.

2. Officer Sanchez did not violate plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment

rights because plaintiffs did not show that Officer Sanchez acted with a purpose to

harm unrelated to legitimate law enforcement objectives. Id. at 554. The evidence

does not suggest a purpose to harm, and his conduct was related to legitimate law

enforcement objectives of self-defense and the defense of others. Therefore,

Officer Sanchez is entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs’ Fourteenth

Amendment claim.

2
3. Because Officer Sanchez’s conduct was reasonable under the Fourth

Amendment, it is also reasonable under state tort law. See Brown v. Ransweiler,

89 Cal. Rptr. 3d 801, 817 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009); Edson v. City of Anaheim, 74 Cal.

Rptr. 2d 614, 616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998). Therefore, defendants are entitled to

summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ state tort claims.

AFFIRMED.

3
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Roberts,the Chief Financial Officer of InfoLogix, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

·                    theForm 10-Q of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

·                    theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:  August 14, 2007 |
|------------------------------|
| /s/ John A. Roberts          |   |
| John A. Roberts              |
| Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

ThermoLife International LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States Department of Health and 

Human Services, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-04049-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 Pursuant to this Court’s Order of March 14, 2018 (Doc. 15), 

 IT IS ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to close this matter. 

 Dated this 16th day of May, 2018. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:17-cv-04049-JJT Document 16 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Sridhar Ganesan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of WorldSpace, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2007



/s/    SRIDHAR
GANESANSridhar GanesanExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12744]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.
Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 23, 1996.
Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.
Status: Open.
Matters to be Considered:
    1. Proposed policy statement describing how interest rate risk will 
be measured and evaluated for supervisory purposes (proposed earlier 
for public comment; Docket No. R-0802).
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

    Note: This meeting will be recorded for the benefit of those 
unable to attend. Cassettes will be available for listening in the 
Board's Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for 
$5 per cassette by calling (202) 452-3684 or by writing to: Freedom 
of Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System,Washington, D.C. 20551.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-12744 Filed 5-16-96; 2:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25490-25491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12710]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Semiannual Report of Payment Accepted From Non-Federal Sources 
Under 31 U.S.C. 1353 for the Period Beginning October 1, 1995, Ending 
March 31, 1996, Summary Report; Revision

Reimbursement/In-kind Payments in Excess of $250

    Total Number of Sponsored Events: 86.
    Total Number of Sponsoring Organizations: 76.
    Total Number of Different Commissioners/Employees Attending: 82.

Total Amount of Reimbursement Received

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Check        In-kind  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In excess of $250...........................   $103,597.12    $42,156.78
Under $250 (Detail not included)............        948.25        356.60
                                             ---------------------------
      Total.................................    104,545.37     42,513.38
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Semiannual Report of Payment Accepted From Non-Federal Sources Under 31 
U.S.C. 1353 for Period Beginning April 1, 1995, Ending September 30, 
1995

1. Agency: Federal Communications Commission.
2. Employee: Government Position: Jane E. Mago--Revised, Senior Advisor 
to Commissioner, Rachelle B. Chong.
3. Event: 1995 FCBA Annual Seminar.
4. Sponsor of Event: Federal Communications, Bar Association--FCBA.
5. Sponsor Address: 1722 Eye Street NW., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 
20006.
6. Location of Event: Hot Springs, Virginia.
7. Employee's Role: Panelist.
8. Dates of Event: 05/19-21/95.
9. Travel Dates: 05/19-21/95.

                                                                        
                                                         (c) Type and   
                                                       amount of payment
              10. (a) Nature of benefit                                 
                                                        Check    In kind
                                                                        
      1. Round- trip Transportation.................   $120.00   $      
      2. Hotel Room.................................              432.64
      3. Meals......................................              100.00
                                                     -------------------
                                                        120.00    532.64
    (b) Non-Fed Source: Same as No. 4.                                  
                                                                        


[[Page 25491]]


Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12710 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Age Translation, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Fahlberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 21st day of June, 2006.



| | JOHN FAHLBERG                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | John Fahlberg                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---