Page | 1

DECLARATION OF PETER STROJNIK UNDER THE PENALTY OF

PERJURY

I, Peter Strojnik, make the following Declaration under the penalty of perjury

1. I have been an attorney in Maricopa County since 1980. 

2. My current primary practice is civil rights enforcement of Title III of the ADA. I have 

filed and prosecuted more than one thousand five hundred ADA cases.

3. My fees are based on the lodestar analysis which is “[t]he most useful starting point 

for determining the amount of a reasonable fee is the number of hours reasonably 

expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.” Hensley v. 

Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983). This “lodestar” figure presumptively provides 

an accurate measure of reasonable fees. To get to the lodestar figure, a plaintiff hereby 

submits “satisfactory evidence ... that the requested rates are in line with those 

prevailing in the community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable 

skill, experience, and reputation.” Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895-96 n. 11 (1984). 

The relevant community is that in which the district court sits. Schwartz v. Secretary 

of Health and Human Servs., 73 F.3d 895, 906 (9th Cir. 1995). 

4. I charge a fee of $650.00 as stated in the Representation and Fee Agreement attached 

as Addendum A. The $650/hr. fee is reasonable. For reasons stated in this Motion, the 

amount of $10,335.00 is reasonable and compliant with LRCivP and ER 1.5(a) factors 

1-8 all of which support the reasonableness of this amount1. Plaintiff’s counsel has been 

an attorney for thirty-seven (37) years and has prosecuted more than one thousand five 

hundred Title III ADA cases. Counsel’s fees are in line with those prevailing in the 

community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience, 

 

1

(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and 

the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (2) the likelihood, if apparent to 

the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment 

by the lawyer; (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; 

(4) the amount involved and the results obtained; (5) the time limitations imposed by the 

client or by the circumstances; (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship 

with the client; (7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers 

performing the services and (8) the degree of risk assumed by the lawyer.

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 11
Page | 2

and reputation, to wit, (1) Paul Rein charges $645/hr. and (2) the law firm of Sherman 

Howard (John Doran), a lawyer with much lesser experience and length of practice 

charges $575.00 per hour for ADA defense work. The important part and time-logging 

part of the hours billed is the pre-filing due diligence, which saw me in fact verify the 

barrier that Plaintiff personally encountered. For reasons stated in this Motion, the 

amount of $10,335.00 is reasonable and compliant with ER 1.5(a) factors 1-8 all of 

which support the reasonableness of this amount.

5. The importance of the length of practice and experience in ADA Title III litigation are 

equaled by the risks to counsel in ADA representation. It is well known that I have been 

the subject of relentless attacks by the regressive media and governmental institutions. 

The Arizona Attorney General Mr. Brnovich intervened in more than approximately

1,500.00 cases seeking not only a dismissal of legitimate claims but sanctions against 

the undersigned pro bono counsel in those case. All these sanctions motions have been 

dismissed with prejudice because the State Court recognized that a continuing 

persecution of civil rights pro bono counsel would not “advance the cause of justice”. 

Exhibit 1 to Motion. Not having found a receptive ear in the State Court, Mr. Brnovich 

recently filed a Motion to Intervene in one of Judge Wake cases, Advocates for 

Individuals with Disabilities v. MidFirst Bank, 2:16-cv-01969-NVW, Exhibit 2 to 

Motion, in which he seeks to designate the undersigned pro bono counsel (in referenced 

case) a “vexatious litigant”.

6. Equally important is the fact that I am subject to physical risk to my personal well-being

in litigating ADA cases and have been subject to death threats and relentless threatening 

phone calls.

7. Also relevant is the fact that some members of the regressive media have relentlessly 

disparaged my good name and reputation.

8. I believe that risks undertaken by civil rights attorneys like me are necessary to advance 

the time when public accommodations comply with the ADA. If attorneys like me 

would succumb to the relentless threats and pressures of the regressive media and 

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 2 of 11
Page | 3

Arizona’s political class, the State of Arizona would become a sanctuary state for ADA 

violators.

9. Because of regressive social policies, I have undertaken extraordinary due diligence 

before filing even one lawsuit based on 28 CFR §36.302(e) and the 2010 Standards. 

10.Based on the intensity of the attacks on me, I concluded that any case must be fully 

prepared prior to filing suit. Thus, for example, even before suit is filed, I personally 

conduct factual and legal due diligence, collect signatures and Declarations, hire a 

photographer and other third-party vendors and prepare a verified mandatory initial 

disclosure before filing suit and serves them on Defendant along with the Summons 

and Complaint. 

11.I have the requisite qualities as an advocate to litigate the type of case in issue here, 

and the requisite ability, training, education, experience, professional standing and 

skill.

12.The character of the work involved here, the difficulty, intricacy, importance, time and 

skill required, the responsibility imposed and the prominence and character of the 

parties where they affect the importance of the litigation are factors which weigh 

heavily in favor of my application.

13.I am familiar with the time spent and fees incurred in pre-and post-judgment 

proceedings. The time spent, and fees incurred were necessary and reasonable.

14.My regular hourly fee for ADA enforcement litigation is $650.00. 

15.The time records are appended hereto as Addendum B.

16.I adopt the entire discussion of fees set forth in the Application for Fees, Costs 

and Expenses to which this is attached as exhibit.

VERIFICATION

The undersigned verifies under the penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct 

to the best of his knowledge, information and belief. 

DATED AND SIGNED NEXT PAGE

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 3 of 11
Page | 4

DATED this 21ST day of March 2018.

 STROJNIK, P.C. 

 

 Peter Strojnik

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 4 of 11
Page | 5

ADDENDUM A

REPRESENTATION AND FEE AGREEMENT

CLIENT: Fernando Gastelum

ATTORNEY: Peter Strojnik

MATTER: Civil Rights and Related Claims (ADA, Consumer Fraud, Negligence etc.) (“Claim”)

DEFENDANT: Any Person or Entity who is or may be responsible for ADA violation(s) at the location 

described as: Super 8 Phoenix Downtown

DATE: 2017-12-18

Matter of Representation: Client authorizes Attorney to act on Client's behalf in all matters related to Client's Claims. 

Attorney will undertake Client’s representation and work with Client to achieve the desired objectives by using 

Attorney’s best judgment, skill, and experience. Client understands that Attorney cannot and has not made any 

guarantee regarding the outcome of any Claim. Client further understands that Attorney will investigate Client’s 

Claims and if a Claim does not appear to Attorney to have merit or is not economically feasible to pursue, Attorney 

shall have the right to reject representation with respect to such Claim. 

Nature of Representation: Attorney shall represent Client pro bono publico, meaning that Client shall owe Attorney 

no money for Attorney’s time spent on representation. Client specifically recognizes that upon successful conclusion 

of any claim, Attorney shall be authorized to request attorney’s fees from the opposing party at Attorney’s hourly fee 

of $650.00. 

Reasonableness of Rate, Costs and Expenses: (1) The rate of $650.00 per hour is reasonable based on Attorney’s 

36-year litigation experience in general litigation law and, particularly, considering his extensive experience with 

ADA compliance litigation risk associated with ADA litigation, particularly the likelihood of success and the inherent 

hostility of all levels of society. (2) Client has paid no fees and no advanced costs to Attorney. At the conclusion of 

the case, client authorizes Attorney to pay the costs and expenses from any settlement or award. (3) These charges, 

costs and fees are based on Attorney’s estimates based on innumerable cases filed by Attorney in his experience both 

in general litigation matters and particularly the civil rights (ADA) enforcement matters. The costs and expenses are 

estimated as follows:

TO FOR

ANTICIPATED COST 

OR EXPENSE

Person conducting physical 

inspection

Driving to location, reviewing compliance as 

required, taking photographs and other pre-filing 

tasks as required by Attorney

$200

Person gathering ownership 

information and collecting 

photographs

Reviewing ownership information and preparing 

due diligence report relating to location and 

photographs

$500

Client Expenses Mileage, time, effort, reviews, collection of 

evidence and other expenses as required by 

Attorney

$350

Clerk of Court Filing Fee $400

Process Server Service of Process Fee $50 - $200

Expert Expert Review of ADA Compliance (if needed) $500 - $1,000

Costs and Expenses: Costs and expenses shall be advanced by Attorney; however, all costs and expenses incurred 

and paid by Attorney shall be paid to Attorney at the conclusion of the case. In the event a particular Claim does not 

result in a settlement or an award of costs, expenses and fees, then Attorney shall be entitled to recover his costs and 

expenses from the proceeds of another Claim or waive the costs and expenses at his discretion.

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 5 of 11
Page | 6

Media: “Historically, society has tended to isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities, and, despite some 

improvements, such forms of discrimination against individuals with disabilities continue to be a serious and pervasive 

social problem”, see 42 USC 12101(a)(2). This pervasive discrimination has permeated all three levels of government 

and the media. The media perpetuate the discrimination and isolation against the disabled community. It is quite 

common for the media to ambush civil rights litigants in order to portray them in a false light. Therefore, whenever 

Client is approached by any member of the media, Client will refer all questions to Attorney, saying, 

“All media inquiries are handled by my attorney Mr. Strojnik”

Attorney Lien: Client grants to Attorney an irrevocable lien against any settlement or award for costs and fees. This 

lien shall be enforceable irrespective of any termination of representation.

Termination: Client may terminate this Agreement at any time for any reason or no reason at all. In the event of 

Client’s termination of this Agreement, Attorney shall be entitled to recover all costs, expenses and shall be entitled 

to be paid for his time incurred in all cases at his regular rate of $650.00 per hour. 

Attorney may terminate this agreement and withdraw from representation of Client if Client fails to reasonably assist 

and cooperate in the prosecution of the Claims. In such circumstances, Client will reimburse Attorney for any costs 

or expenses, if any, that have been incurred on Client's behalf. Attorney may also terminate this agreement and 

withdraw from representation of Client if it becomes, in the good faith judgment of Attorney, imprudent, illegal or 

unethical to pursue Client's claim(s). If Attorney terminates this agreement and withdraws from representation of 

Client under these circumstances, Client does not owe Attorney any fees for legal services.

Settlement or Award: In the event that Client’s Claim(s) result(s) in a judicial award or settlement payment, such 

sums shall be distributed as follows: (1) To Attorney for costs, expenses and litigation management, then (2) To Client 

the sum of $350.00 for his expenses and then (3) to Attorney for attorney’s fees. 

Attorney shall have the unfettered discretion in all settlement matters provided, however, that Client’s consent shall 

be required when the settlement amount is less than $350.00 payable to Client.

Client specifically instructs Attorney to deposit all amounts into the Strojnik, P.C. account and to make distributions 

therefrom.

No Advice Regarding This Fee Agreement: Attorney is not acting as Clients’ counsel in advising Client with respect 

to this agreement, as Attorney would have a conflict of interest in doing so. If Client wishes to be advised by 

independent counsel concerning this fee agreement, Attorney recommends that Client consult with independent 

counsel of their choice. In addition, if Client has any questions or would like additional information, Attorney would 

be happy to discuss this matter with Client.

CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT CLIENT HAS READ THIS AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, THAT 

CLIENT UNDERSTANDS IT, AND THAT CLIENT AGREES TO ITS TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

CLIEN FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ATTORNEY HAS FULLY AND COMPLETELY 

DISCLOSED HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS PLAINTIFFS AND THE RESULTS OF 

SUCH REPRESENTATION AND HAS FULLY AND COMPLETELY ANSWERED ALL QUESTIONS 

REGARDING THIS FEE AGREEMENT, HIS PRIOR REPRESENTATION AND THE ADA.

CLIENT

/s/ Fernando Gastelum

Fernando Gastelum

Electronic signature authorized

ATTORNEY

/s/ Peter Strojnik

Peter Strojnik

Electronic signature authorized

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 6 of 11
Page | 7

ADDENDUM B

S T A T E M E N T O F A C C O U N T 

Client: Fernando Gastelum

Matter: Tempe Phoenix Innsuites

Date : 2018-03-21

Rate : 650/hr. - 0.25 minimum billing time (reduced to 0.10)

ATTORNEY’S FEES

DATE DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RENDERED BY TIME

2017-12-19 In person meeting with FG regarding issues raised by the client 

and matters of representation. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (1.85)

PS 1.85

2017-12-19 Discussion with EG regarding websites. Document same in 

Statement of Account. (0.50)

PS 0.50

2017-12-19 Due diligence visit to hotel to review generally ADA compliance 

as reported by EG. Document same in Statement of Account.

(1.85)

PS 1.85

2017-12-19 Review Assessor Information regarding ownership. Document 

same in Statement of Account.

PS 0.25

2017-12-19 Review CC Information. Document same in Statement of 

Account.

PS 0.25

2017-12-19 Independent review of websites. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (1.00)

PS 1.00

2017-12-21 Review FG Declaration and Due Diligence Report. Document 

same in Statement of Account. (0.25)

PS 0.25

2017-12-21 Review call recording FG made to hotel Document same in 

Statement of Account. (0.25)

PS 0.25

2017-12-21 Review ADA Report. Document same in Statement of Account.

(0.65)

PS 0.65

2017-12-21 Prepare Fee Agreement; electronic signature authorized. 

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.25)

PS 0.25

2017-12-21 Review entire due diligence file including assessor information 

and corporate information in preparation for drafting Verified 

complaint. Document same in Statement of Account. (0.40)

PS 0.40

2017-12-21 Conduct legal investigation of sufficiency of 302(e) disclosures.

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.20)

PS 0.20

2017-12-21 Preparation, review and submission of MIDP disclosures and 

request for electronic signatures. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.40)

PS 0.40

2 3 7 5 E A S T C A M E L B A C K R O A D - S U I T E 6 0 0 – P H O E N I X – A R I Z O N A – 8 5016

C E L L : 6 0 2 . 5 2 4 . 6 6 0 2 – E M A I L : P S @ S T R O J N I K . C O M

W E B S I T E : W W W . S T R O J N I K . C O M

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 7 of 11
Page | 8

DATE DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RENDERED BY TIME

2017-12-21 Preparation, review and submission of draft Complaint to client 

and request for signature authority. Document same in Statement 

of Account. (0.95)

PS 0.95

2017-12-21 Preparation, review, and submission of civil cover sheet.

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-12-21 Preparation, review, and submission of Summons. Document 

same in Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-12-21 Review Doc 1- Complaint. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-12-21 Review Doc 2- Summons Submitted. Document same in 

Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-12-21 Review Doc 3- Notice of Availability of US Magistrate Judge. 

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-12-21 Review Doc 4- Summons Issued. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-12-21 Review Doc 5- Notice MIDP. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-12-21 Review Doc 6- ORDER 12 b motions. Document same in 

Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2017-01-04 Preparation, review, and submission of discovery request number 

1 for service on defendant along with summons and complaint. 

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.20)

PS 0.20

2018-01-05 Receipt and review of email from process server regarding two 

failed attempts at only address listed on the Arizona Corporation 

Commission site for defendant. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.25)

PS 0.25

2018-01-06 Send Process Server email devising a plan to attempt once more at 

listed address and then proceed to serve the ACC. Document same 

in Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2018-01-11 Receipt and review of invoice and proof of service upon ACC and

file the same. Document same in Statement of Account. (0.35)

PS 0.35

2018-01-11 Review Doc 7- Notice of Service of MIDP. Document same in 

Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2018-01-11 Review Doc 8- Service Executed. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2018-01-31 Review, Save and Calendar Doc 9- ORDER setting a Rule 16 

Scheduling Conference for 4/5/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 

605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before 

Judge Diane J Humetewa. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a 

copy of this order upon Defendant and file notice of service. 

Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 1/30/2018. (See Order for 

details.) (LFIG) Document same in Statement of Account.

PS 0.25

2018-01-31 Review Doc 10- Answer and compare same against Verified 

Complaint and Plaintiff’s MIDP Disclosures and reports.

Document same in Statement of Account.

PS 0.35

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 8 of 11
Page | 9

DATE DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RENDERED BY TIME

Verified Complaint:

31. 1

st party website failed to identify and describe 

mobility related accessibility features and guest rooms 

offered through its reservations service in enough 

detail to reasonably permit Plaintiff to assess 

independently whether Defendant’s hotel meets his 

accessibility needs.

Answer:

31. In response to Paragraph 31 of the Verified Complaint, 

Defendant admits that its hotel’s website is not fully compliant 

with 28 CFR § 36.302(e) and plans to remedy the alleged 

violation(s) in a timely manner.

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.35)

2018-01-31 Review Doc 11- Defendants Corporate Disclosure Statement. 

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2018-02-01 Preparation, review and submission of Motion for Partial 

Judgment on the Pleadings. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (1.00)

PS 1.00

2018-02-01 Preparation, review and submission of proposed order. Document 

same in Statement of Account. (0.25)

PS 0.25

2018-02-15 Review Offer of Judgment. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.20)

PS 0.20

2018-02-15 Review Doc 13- Notice of Service of Offer of Judgment. 

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.25)

PS 0.25

2018-02-15 Conference with FG regarding the offer of judgment. Offer 

accepted. Document same in Statement of Account. (0.15)

PS 0.15

2018-02-15 Preparation, review and submission of e-mail to LL accepting 

Offer of Judgment. Document same in Statement of Account.

PS 0.10

2018-02-15 Review Doc 14- Notice of Service of Offer of Judgment. 

Document same in Statement of Account. (0.10)

PS 0.10

2018-03-12 Review and decalendar Doc 15- ORDER the Rule 16 Scheduling 

Conference set for April 5, 2018 is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER 

ORDERED the [12] Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings 

is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 

3/12/2018. (LFIG) Document same in Statement of Account.

PS 0.15

2018-03-13 Review Doc 16- CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to Plaintiff 

having accepted Defendant's offer of judgment, judgment is 

hereby entered against Defendant Day & Sam Incorporated as 

follows: 1. Defendant will (within 60 days) identify and describe 

on its website accessible features found in each of the following 

areas of the hotel: (1) Parking and Loading Zone; (2) Exterior 

Routes; (3) Building Entrances and Lobby; (4) Interior Routes; (5) 

Public/Common Use Restrooms; (6) Accessible Guestrooms and 

Suites; (7) Accessible Guestroom Bathrooms; and (8) Pool/Spa 

PS 0.15

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 9 of 11
Page | 10

DATE DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RENDERED BY TIME

area. 2. Defendant will (within 60 days) communicate the above 

referenced accessible features to all third party booking agents 

who facilitate online or telephonic reservations for Defendant's 

hotel. Defendant shall provide Plaintiff with a copy of this 

communication. 3. Defendant will (within 60 days) modify its 

policies, practices and procedures to ensure that individuals who 

require mobility and/or ambulatory assistance can make 

reservations for accessible guest rooms during the same hours and 

in the same manner as individuals who do not require mobility 

and/or ambulatory assistance Defendant shall provide Plaintiff 

with a copy of the modified policies, practices and procedures 

referenced herein. 4. Defendant shall (within 90 days) identify 

mobility accessibility features at its hotel that do not comply with 

the 2010 Standards of Accessibility Design and shall, within 12 

months, remove barriers to mobility accessibility to the extent that 

such removal is readily achievable. This matter is hereby 

terminated. (SLQ) Document same in Statement of Account.

(0.25)

2018-03-21 Audit Statement of Account to comply with LRCivP 54.2, 

Gametech Intern., Inc. v. Trend Gaming Systems, LLC, 380 F. 

Supp. 2d 1084, 1101 (D. Ariz. 2005), and reduction of ) of (0.25) 

minimum time authorized by the Fee Agreement to 0.10 accepted 

to the District Court. Document same in Statement of Account.

(0.80)

PS 0.80

2018-03-21 Preparation, review and preparation for filing of Declaration of 

Peter Strojnik under the Penalty of Perjury. This time is less than 

the appearance requires because Counsel used a previous form of 

same. Document same in Statement of Account. (0.30)

PS 0.30

2018-03-21 Preparation, review and submission for filing of Plaintiff’s 

Application for Fees, Costs and Expenses. This time is less than 

the appearance requires because Counsel used a previous form of 

same. Document same in Statement of Account. (0.40)

PS 0.40

2018-03-21 Preparation of proposed Order. Document same in Statement of 

Account. (0.15)

PS 0.15

2018-03-21 Preparation, review and submission of e-mail to Leavitt with 

proposal of settlement. Document same in Statement of Account.

(0.10)

PS 0.10

2018-03-21 Preparation and review of Statement of Consultation to be filled 

out upon receipt of response from Leavitt. Document same in 

Statement of Account. (0.15)

PS 0.15

ATTORNEY TIME TOTAL 15.90

REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEE $10,335.00

COSTS AND EXPENSES 

EG Investigation and Photography $200.00

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 10 of 11
Page | 11

Third Party Generated Due Diligence Report regarding prelitigation due diligence relating to ownership, statutory agent and 

due diligence report of photographic evidence. 

$500.00

Filing Fee $400.00

Service of Process Fee $145.40

FG Expenses $350.00

Common Pre-Filing Due Diligence Apportioned $1,362.40

TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES $2,957.80

 

Case 2:17-cv-04728-DJH Document 17-5 Filed 03/21/18 Page 11 of 11