alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF
KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, File No. 333-37804), pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No.
333-67070), pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Employee and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, each of Vyyo Inc., of our report dated January 15, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vyyo Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.





| | /s/ | KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN CPAs (ISR)
| | --- | --------------------------------

| | A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
| | --------------------------------------------------------




Tel-Aviv, Israel


February 15, 2002




1
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 2 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 3 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 4 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 5 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 6 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 7 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 8 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 9 of 10
Case 4:18-cr-00033-JAS-EJM Document 68 Filed 09/06/18 Page 10 of 10
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12979]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Information Collection Request for Reinstatement Review

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Fish and Wildlife Service 
(Service) is planning to submit the collection of information 
requirement described below to the Offices of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for reinstatement approval under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act. Copies of the collection requirement and related forms 
and explanatory material may be obtained by contacting the Service's 
clearance officer at the phone number listed below. The Service is 
soliciting comment and suggestions on the requirement as described 
below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 22, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Mail Stop 224-Arlington Square, 1849 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Phyllis H. Cook, Service Information Collection Clearance Officer, 704/
358-1943; 703/358-2269 (fax).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Grant Agreement and Grant Amendment.
    OMB Approval Number: 1018-0048.
    Abstract: The Service administers several grant programs authorized 
by the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in 
Sport Fish Restoration Act, the Anadromous Fish Conservation Act, the 
Endangered Species Act and the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection 
and Restoration Act. The Service uses the information collected to make 
awards, including determining if the estimated cost is reasonable, the 
cost sharing is consistent with the applicable program statutes, and 
whether sufficient Federal funds are available for obligation. The 
State uses the forms to request funds and identify proposed cost 
sharing. An amendment to the Grant Agreement is initiated by the 
grantee (State) to request a change to a previously approved Grant 
Agreement. The information is used to revise a previous funding 
obligation or document the approval of revisions requested.
    Service Form Number(s): 3-1552 (Grant Agreement); 3-1591 (Amendment 
to Grant Agreement).
    Frequency: Annually.
    Description of Respondents: State and Territorial governments.
    Completion Time: The reporting burden is estimated to be 1 hour for 
each form per respondent.
    Annual Responses: 56 (It is estimated that 56 State and/or 
Territorial governments will submit an average of 26 grant agreements 
and/or amendments and that \1/2\ of such grants will be amended.)
    Annual Burden House: 1,456.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Assistant Director--External Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-12979 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.7

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 13, 2007



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1559

MARIE M. MCMAHON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARGARET WORKMAN; THOMAS MCHUGH; ROBIN DAVIS;

ELLIOTT MAYNARD; LARRY V. STARCHER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-1216)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marie M. McMahon, Appellant Pro Se. Ancil Glenn Ramey, STEPTOE &

JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing her

action for failure to comply with a pre-filing injunction requiring

her to obtain leave of court before filing an action and the

court’s denial of her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record, the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation, and the order denying reconsideration, and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. McMahon v. Workman, No. CA-97-1216 (S.D.W.

Va. Feb. 25, 1998, Mar. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT K 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-12 Filed 02/15/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 98-12 Filed 02/15/19 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Hankersen International Corp.
on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

April 13, 2007


By: /S/ PENGCHENG CHEN
    -------------------
    Pengcheng Chen, CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 75 MM 2022 Respondent

V. SHAWN JAMES HAMILTON, Petitioner ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 4t" day of November, 2022, the Petition for Leave to File Petition forAllowance ofAppeal NuncPro Tunc is DENIED.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joe Frank Cuellar, * From the 32nd District Court

 of Nolan County

 Trial Court No. 11383.

Vs. No. 11-15-00079-CR * June 8, 2017

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (i) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter                ended May 31st                ,                2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1                (the                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | *Graham                Alexander*                                  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | GRAHAM                G. ALEXANDER                                 |
|   |   |                                                               |
|   | Title: | Chief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                                                               |
|   | Date:  | July                14th,                2007                      |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its      staff upon request.*

*This      certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933      or      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date      of      the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained      in such filing.*

----
#### Dennis Conrad LINDSLEY, Respondent, v. Elaine Ann LINDSLEY, Appellant.

No. 66784.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 18, 1995.

David B. Lacks and David Y. Collignon, Clayton, for appellant.

Justin C. Cordonnier and Thomas B. Weaver, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and RHODES, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Elaine Ann Lindsley appeals only from the amount of maintenance granted to her in a decree of dissolution of marriage. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the circuit court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 10.16

                    TRADEMARK AND ANCILLARY RIGHTS ASSIGNMENT

        THIS TRADEMARK AND ANCILLARY RIGHTS ASSIGNMENT ("Assignment") is entered
into effective as of the 1st day of November, 2000, by and between ENMAX
CORPORATION, a Utah corporation (the "Corporation"), and ENVIRONMAX.COM, INC., a
Utah corporation ("EnvironMax").

                                    RECITALS:

        A. The Corporation owns and uses in its business operations certain
trademarks, tradenames, service marks and logos more particularly described on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto arising from, but not limited to, certain common law
rights and filings and applications with the State of Utah and/or the federal
government of the United States (collectively, the "Trademark and Ancillary
Rights").

        B. The Corporation desires to assign to EnvironMax, and EnvironMax
desires to accept, all of the Corporation's interest, rights, duties, privileges
and preferences with respect to the Trademark and Ancillary Rights.

                                   ASSIGNMENT:

        NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, including the
consideration specified in that certain Bill of Sale dated as of March 15, 2000
between the Corporation and EnvironMax, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Corporation hereby assigns, transfers, conveys and
relinquishes to EnvironMax all right, title and interest the Corporation may now
or hereafter possess in and to the Trademark and Ancillary Rights, on a
worldwide basis, together with the good will symbolized by any trademarks,
tradenames, service marks and logos comprising part of the Trademark and
Ancillary Rights, including all common law tradename and company home rights
associated therewith, and the right to sue and recover damages for past
infringement of any of the trademarks, tradenames, service marks or logos
comprising any part of the Trademark and Ancillary Rights.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Assignment has been executed as of the day and
date first noted above.

                                       ENMAX CORPORATION



                                       By: /s/ CHARLES MEREDITH
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Its:  Executive Vice President
                                             -----------------------------------



                                       1
<PAGE>   2

                                   EXHIBIT "A"

1.      EnvironMax.com, Inc.

2.      EnvironMax.com

3.      EnvironMax

                                       2
#### Donald L. COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50353.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 18, 1995.

Sysan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of a Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant was convicted of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986 and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986 and sentenced to two concurrent terms of 30 years’ imprisonment.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**List      of Subsidiaries**

| **Name                of Subsidiary**                               | **Country                of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| 642706                B.C. Ltd. (doing business as EYI Management   | British                Columbia, Canada     |
| Halo                Distribution LLC                                | Kentucky,                USA                |
| Essentially                Yours Industries (Canada), Inc.          | Canada                                      |
| Essentially                Yours Industries, Inc.                   | Nevada,                USA                  |
| Essentially                Yours Industries (Hong Kong) Limited     | Hong                Kong                    |
| Essentially                Yours Industries (International) Limited | Hong                Kong                    |
| RGM                International, Inc.                              | Nevada,                USA                  |
| World                Wide Buyers' Club Inc.                         | Nevada,                USA                  |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0129 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LEVI JOSEPH LAVERGNE,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 5 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 29 2023

08/29/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0129
#### Michael GENOVA, et al., Respondents, v. POLLUTION CONTROL INDUSTRIES OF AMERICA, et al., Appellants.

No. WD 48163.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 22, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied June 21, 1994.

John J. Hager, Kathleen A. McNamara, Jolley, Walsh & Hager, P.C., Kansas City, for respondents.

Gary A. Schafersman, Julie J. Gibson, Niewald, Waldeck & Brown, Kansas City, for appellants.

*660Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a motion for summary judgment on a note to purchase real estate. Appellant asserts the court erred on the grounds; 1) it lacked personal jurisdiction because the suit involved title to Kansas real estate, and 2) holding the parol evidence rule defeated its defenses. This court affirms. Rule 84.16(b).
SCWC-20-0000770

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, INC. A SSET-BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-AHL3, Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

vs. PHYLLIS KEHAULANI DUNCAN CHUN, Petitioner/Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant,
and ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-20-0000770; CIV. NO. 1CC141002192)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakamoto, assigned in place of Eddins, J., recused)

Petitioner/defendant-counterclaim plaintiff-appellant Phyllis Kehaulani Duncan Chun’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on May 21, 2021, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 29, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Henry T. Nakamoto Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000770 29-JUN-2021 07:52 AM Dkt. 11 ODAC
Case 3:17-cr-08266-DLR Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:17-cr-08266-DLR Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:17-cr-08266-DLR Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:17-cr-08266-DLR Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 4 of 4
IV 

House Calendar No. 1 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 52 

[Report No. 111–1] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to amend title XXI of 

the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children’s Health 

Insurance Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2009 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to amend 

title XXI of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 2) to amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to extend 

4 and improve the Children’s Health Insurance Program 

5 and for other purposes. All points of order against considVerDate Nov 24 2008 01:20 Jan 14, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR52.RH HR52

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 52 RFH 

1 eration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

2 clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered 

3 as read. All points of order against the bill are waived. 

4 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

5 the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: 

6 (1) one hour of debate equally divided among and con7 trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

8 Committee on Energy and Commerce and the chair and 

9 ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

10 Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 1 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 52 

[Report No. 111–1] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to 

ance Program, and for other purposes. tend and improve the Children’s Health Insuramend title XXI of the Social Security Act to exJANUARY 13, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26897-26898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13350]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1742-000]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Filing

May 22, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 7, 1996, Southern California Edison Company 
tendered for filing a Notice of Cancellation of Rate Schedule FERC No. 
338 and all supplements thereto.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888

[[Page 26898]]

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before June 4, 1996. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13350 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M