alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6998

THURMAN VAN LILLY, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

STAN BURTT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution; 

HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General for the State of South 

Carolina, 

 Respondents - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-00999-JFA) 

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008 

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thurman Van Lilly, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Thurman Van Lilly seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and motion 

to reconsider that denial. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

The time limits for noting an appeal in a civil case 

are set forth in Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, which effectuates 28 U.S.C. § 2107 (2000). See

Bowles v. Russell, 127 S. Ct. 2360, 2363 (2007). Parties are 

accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s 

final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). A failure to file a notice of 

appeal in accordance with § 2107 and Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) 

deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction. Bowles, 127 S. 

Ct. at 2366. 

The district court’s order was entered on its docket 

on May 6, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed, at the 

earliest,* on June 7, 2008, thirty-two days later. Because Lilly 

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an 

extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the 

 * See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 

2 
3 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2 A-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devine Entertainment
Corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2007

                                               /s/ Richard Mozer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name:  Richard Mozer
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2




MMC
ENERGY, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MMC Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Denis Gagnon, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MMC Energy, Inc. and will be retained by MMC Energy, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May
      15, 2009/s/
      Denis GagnonDenis
      GagnonChief
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32
  Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
      Dated: November 5, 2008

/s/  Michael
    T. FriesMichael T. Fries
           Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 5, 2008

/s/  Charles
    H.R. BrackenCharles H.R.
    Bracken
           Senior Vice President
    and Co-Chief Financial Officer
           (Principal Financial
    Officer)Dated: November 5, 2008

/s/  Bernard
    G. DvorakBernard G. Dvorak
           Senior Vice President
    and Co-Chief Financial Officer
           (Principal Accounting
    Officer)
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Julian E Gaytan, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WF CRD SVC, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-18-00358-PHX-SRB (ESW)

ORDER 

 On August 30, 2018, the Court’s Order (Doc. 11) sent from the Clerk of Court to 

Plaintiff was returned to the Court as undeliverable (Doc. 13). The returned envelope is 

marked “Return to Sender/Attempted-Not Known/Unable to Forward.” (Id.). The Court 

previously warned Plaintiff that the failure to file a notice of change of address may result 

in the dismissal of this action. (Doc. 8 at 4). Therefore, 

 IT IS ORDERED that by October 27, 2018, Plaintiff shall either (i) file a notice 

of change of address with the Court or (ii) show cause why this action should not be 

dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order and to prosecute this case. 

 Dated this 25th day of September, 2018. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12971]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated February 2, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on February 13, 1996, (61 FR 5570), Ansys Inc., 2 Goodyear, 
Irvine, California 92718, made application to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathinone (1235)...........................  I                          
Methcathinone (1237).......................  I                          
Heroin (9200)..............................  I                          
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II                         
1-Piperidinocyclohexanecarbonitrile (8603).  II                         
Levorphanol (9220).........................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Ansys Inc. to manufacture the listed controlled substances is 
consistent with the public interest at this time. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR Secs. 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the 
application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above 
is granted.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-12971 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandro Natale, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that;





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:
January
                7, 2008
              
              
              /s/
                Sandro
                NataleSandro
                  Natale
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMark J. DeCesarisacting Chief Financial Officer
 CPA®:14
2007 10-K  78
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Peter Kristofer Strojnik, State Bar No. 242728 

strojnik@skplaw.com 

THE STROJNIK FIRM LLC 

Esplanade Center III, Suite 700 

2415 East Camelback Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85016 

Telephone: (602) 510-9409 

Facsimile: (602) 865-7788 

Attorneys for Plaintiff THERESA BROOKE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

THERESA BROOKE, a married woman 

dealing with her sole and separate claim, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CASA GRANDE SUITES HOLDINGS, 

LLC, 

 Defendant. 

Case No: 2:18-cv-00144-HRH 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff Theresa Brooke dismisses the above 

action with prejudice; each party to bear her/its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 14th day of February, 2018. 

 THE STROJNIK FIRM L.L.C. 

 

 

 

 Peter Kristofer Strojnik (242728) 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff THERESA BROOKE 

Case 2:18-cv-00144-HRH Document 9 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the “Report”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, IJoseph Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant toSec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Joseph Driscoll     |                   |
|--------------------------|------------------------|
| Joseph  Driscoll         | November 19, 2008 |
| Chief  Financial Officer |                   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13818]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 19, 1996.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Angela L. Redlingshafer, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-1367.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: May 29, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13818 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                         330 E. Warm Springs
                                         Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                702.257.1984
                                            702.362.0540 fax





March 27, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

The  firm  of  G.  Brad  Beckstead,  CPA,  consents  to  the
inclusion  of my report of March 27, 2002, on the  Financial
Statements  of  Accessory Specialists Incorporated  for  the
years  ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, in its Form  10K-SB
filing  to  be  filed  with the US Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.

Signed,




G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Mark Powell, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-17-50208-PHX-JJT 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On July 26, 2018, defendant, Mark Powell, appeared before this Court on a petition 

for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the information provided to the 

Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining whether the defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 

3143. 

. . . 

. . . 

. . . 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 27th day of July, 2018.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 105 (Thursday, May 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 27049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13583]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-827]


Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China; 
Termination In-Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of termination in-part of antidumping duty 
administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 1, 1996, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on certain cased pencils from the People's Republic of China 
(PRC). The Department is now terminating this review in-part with 
respect to Shanghai Foreign Trade Corporation (SFTC).

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 30, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Merchant or Thomas Futtner, 
Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone (202) 482-0367/3814.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 1, 1996 (61 FR 3670), the Department published in the 
Federal Register a notice of initiation of administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on certain cased pencils from the PRC. This 
notice stated that the Department would review merchandise sold in the 
United States by SFTC during the period December 21, 1994 through 
November 30, 1995.
    The petitioners in this case withdrew their request for review of 
SFTC on April 29, 1996. Under 19 CFR 353.22(a)(5) (1994), a party 
requesting a review may withdraw that request no later than 90 days 
after the date of publication of the notice of initiation. Because the 
withdrawal request was made within the time frame specified in 19 CFR 
353.22(a)(5), and no other interested party has requested an 
administrative review for SFTC for this period, the Department is now 
terminating this review, in-part, with respect to SFTC.

    Dated: May 17, 1996.

    This notice is published pursuant to 19 CFR 353.22(a)(5).
Paul L. Joffe,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-13583 Filed 5-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT
31. 1


CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





I, Jack
J. Walker certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 of
AeroGrow International Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting.








Date:  February
      17, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Jack J.
      WalkerJack
      J. WalkerChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)