alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 13, 2011
    /s/ Paul F. TruexPaul F. TruexPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2009(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, I Jason Macari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                 The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                 The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Jason Macari        |                   |
|--------------------------|------------------------|
| Jason  Macari            | September 1, 2009 |
| Chief  Executive Officer |                   |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Christopher CAMPBELL, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 63524.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 21, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 27, 1994.

*541Stormy White, Public Defender, Clayton, for appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Elizabeth Levin Ziegler, Office of the Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before • CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction, in a judge-tried case, of one count of forcible rape, § 566.030.1, RSMo Supp.1992. He was sentenced by the court to life imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0000984 

18-JUN-2014 

10:01 AM 

SCWC-12-0000984
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee.
 

vs.
 

TOI NOFOA,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0000984; CR. NO. 08-1-1504)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Toi Nofoa’s application 

for writ of certiorari filed on May 2, 2014, is hereby accepted 

and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be 

notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 18, 2014. 

Craig W. Jerome

for petitioner
 /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama


/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

Sonja P. McCullen


for respondent
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Todd M. Pitcher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Superclick, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made know to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures,  and  presented  in this  annual  report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on our evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:17-cr-01110-DLR Document 116 Filed 06/05/18 Page 11 of 11
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SANDRA HAPUARACHCHI, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-1402

LT Case No. 2021-DR-000676

DON HAPUARACHCHI, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed October 19, 2022 

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Flagler County, 

Christopher A. France, Judge. 

Sandra Hapuarachchi, Miami Gardens,

pro se.

William B. White, Flagler Beach, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26548-26549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13295]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26549]]

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Cross Disciplinary Activities; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Cross Disciplinary Activities 
(#1193).
    Date and Time: June 14, 1996; 8:30 am-5 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1150 and 1120, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person(s): Rita V. Rodriguez, Program Director, CISE/
CDA, Room 1160, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1980.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate NSF-CONACyT Collaborative 
Research Opportunities proposals as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13295 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory J. Kuykendall, Bar # 012508

Amy P. Knight, Bar # 031374

KUYKENDALL & ASSOCIATES

531 S Convent Avenue

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 792-8033

greg@kuykendall-law.com

amyknight@kuykendall-law.com

Pro Bono Attorneys for Defendant Scott Daniel Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT DANIEL WARREN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 17-mj-00341-RCC(JR)

NOTICE OF DEFENSES

Defendant, Scott Daniel Warren, by and through his attorneys undersigned, 

Gregory J. Kuykendall, and Amy P. Knight, hereby provides notice to the 

government that he may present evidence of the following defenses at trial in this 

matter.

1. The defendant’s conduct was protected by the Religious Freedom 

Restoration Act of 1993, as set forth in his previously filed motion to 

dismiss charges (Doc. 43), and this prosecution constitutes a substantial 

Case 4:17-mj-00341-RCC-JR Document 98 Filed 03/27/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

burden on his exercise of his sincerely held religious beliefs.

2. The defendant acted out of necessity to prevent an imminent harm (the 

deaths of human beings crossing the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife 

Refuge in the summertime) and no available options could similarly 

prevent that harm.

3. Defendant had insufficient notice that the alleged conduct was criminal, 

such that a conviction would violate his Fifth Amendment right to due 

process.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 27th day of March, 2019.

By /s/ Amy P. Knight

Gregory J. Kuykendall

Amy P. Knight

531 S Convent Avenue

Tucson, AZ 85701

Attorneys for Defendant Scott 

Daniel Warren

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on March 27th, 2019, I electronically transmitted a PDF version 

of this document to the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System for filing. A 

paper copy of these documents has been mailed to:

Nathaniel J. Walters, Esq. (email: Nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov) 

Anna R. Wright, Esq. (email: anna.wright@usdoj.gov) 

United States Attorney’s Office 

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, AZ 85701

Case 4:17-mj-00341-RCC-JR Document 98 Filed 03/27/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99(a)(2)

                        Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
management's assertion, that CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc. (the Company)
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. The portfolios covered
by this assertion include Associates Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates,
Series 1998-1 and REMIC Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2002-1 (CitiFinancial
Mortgage Securities Inc. as the issuer of the Series 2002-1). Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc.
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2002, is fairly stated, in all material aspects.



Dallas, Texas

March 27, 2003                                             (signed)  KPMG LLP
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt Worldwide,Inc. (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of his knowledge:

·                  The Annual Report of the Company onForm 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                  The information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

Date: August 31, 2006
| /s/ John J. Haley                          |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                       |   |   |
| John J. Haley                              |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer      |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
| /s/ Carl D. Mautz                          |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
| Carl D. Mautz                              |   |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. andwill be retained by Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2006, of Dresser-Rand Group Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:
November 6, 2006
    
    /s/ Leonard M. AnthonyLeonard M. AnthonyExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
 Page 38 of 40
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jamba, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended July 24, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul E. Clayton, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 31, 2007 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00413-CR

In re Lydia Foster Whiteley

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 51,226, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

Lydia Foster Whiteley fatally shot her common-law husband in the presence of two 

witnesses. She pleaded guilty to murder, was adjudged guilty by the court, and was sentenced to ten years 

in prison. She now appeals from an order by the district court refusing her request for postconviction DNA 

testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 64.01-.05.

Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by 

presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be 

advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 

553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of 

counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of her right to examine the appellate 

record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel=s motion to 

withdraw is granted.

The district court=s order is affirmed.

 

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Affirmed

Filed: October 24, 2002

Do Not Publish