alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jane V.; John A.; John E.; Jane F.; John 

D.; John M.; Jane N.; and John W.; 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Motel 6 Operating L.P., a limited 

partnership; G6 Hospitality LLC, a limited 

liability company, dba Motel 6; and Does 

1-10,

Defendants.

No.: CV-18-0242-PHX-DGC

FORM OF JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the Joint Motion for Entry of Proposed Form of Judgment

(the “Joint Motion”), the Court’s Order Granting Final Settlement Approval (Doc. 87), the 

Consent Decree (Doc. 88), and the Joint Status Report (Doc. 94), and good cause appearing:

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Joint Motion is GRANTED.

2. The parties have complied with all of their duties and obligations under the 

Third Amended Settlement Agreement (Doc. 87) and Consent Decree (Doc. 88), including 

their respective reporting requirements.

3. Final judgment is entered consistent with the terms of the Court’s Order 

Granting Final Settlement Approval (Doc. 87) and the Consent Decree (Doc. 88).

4. The Complaint and this action are dismissed with prejudice. 

/ / /

Case 2:18-cv-00242-DGC Document 96 Filed 05/03/23 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter.

Dated this 2nd day of May, 2023.

Case 2:18-cv-00242-DGC Document 96 Filed 05/03/23 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, David Devine, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Devine
Entertainment Corporation;

      2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not  contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

            a) designed such  disclosure  controls and procedures to ensure that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

            b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure
      controls  and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
      date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            c)  presented in this  quarterly  report our  conclusions  about the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most  recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's  auditors  and the  audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent function):

            a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of
      internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
      record,  process,  summarize and report financial data and have identified
      for  the  registrant's   auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal
      controls; and

            b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and

      6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: December 16, 2005

/s/ David Devine
------------------
Name: David Devine
President and CEO
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 625 

Recognizing and commending the 2009 National Veterans Wheelchair Games, 

to be held in Spokane, Washington, July 13 through 18, 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2009 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS (for herself, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. INSLEE, and Mr. REICHERT) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and commending the 2009 National Veterans 

Wheelchair Games, to be held in Spokane, Washington, 

July 13 through 18, 2009. 

Whereas the National Veterans Wheelchair Games are a 

multi-event sports and rehabilitation program for veterans who use wheelchairs for sports competition due to 

spinal cord injuries, amputations, or neurological problems; 

Whereas the National Veterans Wheelchair Games attract 

more than 500 athletes annually, making the Games the 

largest annual wheelchair sports event in the world; 

Whereas in 2009, the National Veterans Wheelchair Games 

will be held July 13 through 18, in Spokane, Washington; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 625 IH 

Whereas competitive events at the National Veterans Wheelchair Games include swimming, table tennis, 

weightlifting, archery, air guns, basketball, nine-ball, softball, quad rugby, bowling, hand cycling, trapshooting, 

wheelchair slalom, power soccer, a motorized wheelchair 

rally, and track and field events; 

Whereas the National Veterans Wheelchair Games provide 

veterans with disabilities a chance to improve their quality of life and foster better health through sports competition; and 

Whereas past National Veterans Wheelchair Games have produced national and world-class champions and given 

newly disabled veterans, including veterans who have 

served in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, a chance to gain athletic skills and be exposed to other wheelchair athletes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the significant contribution that 

3 the National Veterans Wheelchair Games make to 

4 the lives of disabled veterans who have selflessly 

5 served the United States, including those veterans 

6 who have served in Operation Iraqi Freedom and 

7 Operation Enduring Freedom; and 

8 (2) commends the organizers of and partici9 pants in the 2009 National Veterans Wheelchair 

10 Games for their efforts in the service of the United 

11 States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of our report dated February 25, 2002, except forNote 21, as to which the date is March 28, 2002, included in this Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2001, into the U S Liquids Inc. previously filedForm S-3 Registration Statement File No. 333-34875, Form S-4 RegistrationStatement File No. 333-75287, and Forms S-8 Registration Statement File Nos.333-34689 and 333-93129.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

 

Houston, Texas

March 28, 2002

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc., (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
(the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 20, 2006 |  | /s/ Robert L. Edwards  
|                        |  | Robert L. Edwards      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB/A for the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd M. Pitcher,
      interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
      August 18, 2006


/s/
      Todd
      M. Pitcher


Todd
      M.
      Pitcher


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer And


Principle
      Accounting Officer as of the Year Ended


October
      31, 2005
Exhibit No.
32.1


Form
10-Q


Signet
International Holdings, Inc.


File No.
000-51185




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906
 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ernest W.
Letiziano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  Date: August 11,
      2008
              By: /s/ Ernest W.
      Letiziano
 Ernest W.
Letiziano
 Chief
Executive Officer and
 Chief
Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Peoples First, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year-ending December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Susan H. Reeves, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     the Report full complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



                                 BY:____________________________
                                    Susan H. Reeves
                                    Senior Vice President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                    March  18, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 2, 2007
    
    /s/ Vincent R. Volpe Jr.Vincent R. Volpe Jr.President, Chief Executive Officer andDirector
 Page 30 of 31
EXHIBIT 32.8

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey
L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2008



By:

/s/ TRACEY L. STOCKWELLTracey L. StockwellTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)




39
Case 2:17-mj-08461-JZB Document 1 Filed 11/24/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-08461-JZB Document 1 Filed 11/24/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-08461-JZB Document 1 Filed 11/24/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-08461-JZB Document 1 Filed 11/24/17 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



In connection
with the Annual Report of I-many, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of I-many, Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|/S/    JOHN A. RADE                                                               
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President(principal executive officer)      
|                                                                                  
|April 10, 2006                                                                    
|                                                                                  
|/S/    KEVIN M. HARRIS                                                            
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)
|                                                                                  
|April 10, 2006
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Willie THOMAS, Defendant/Appellant. Willie THOMAS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 65642, 67565.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 5, 1995.

John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Christine M. Blegan, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.016, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced in accordance with the jury’s assessment verdict, respectively, to concurrent terms of seven and twenty years. He also appealed the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
#### Castidel MOORE, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 54811.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 25, 1988.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 7, 1988.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 17, 1989.

*678Beverly A. Beimdiek, St. Louis, for mo-vant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Levin Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Movant, Castidel Moore, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion1 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant entered pleas of guilty to two counts of first degree robbery. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each count, the terms to run concurrently.

He subsequently filed a Rule 27.26 motion. In that motion, movant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel for his counsel’s failure to investigate defense witnesses, his failure to depose a victim, and his failure to argue a motion to suppress identification. Movant further alleged that counsel’s lack of preparation forced him to plead guilty.

Movant’s sole point on appeal is that the motion court erred in denying his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

An evidentiary hearing is not required if the motion and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief. Rule 27.26(e).

We first address movant’s claim that his guilty pleas were induced by his counsel’s lack of preparedness. This contention is refuted by the record. The transcript of the guilty plea hearing shows that the trial court questioned movant to ensure the voluntariness of his pleas. He stated that he was pleased with his attorney’s representation of him and that his pleas were not coerced in any way. Movant’s testimony conclusively showed that his pleas were voluntary. Since movant’s claim relating to his guilty plea was unfounded, the court properly denied mov-ant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Movant also claims ineffective assistance of counsel. Where movant’s conviction was pursuant to a plea of guilty, a motion court is only required to hold an evidentiary hearing on allegations relating to ineffective assistance of counsel if the allegations are not refuted by the record *679and they indicate that the plea was not knowing and voluntary. *Id.*“A plea of guilty voluntarily and understanding^ made waives all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses.” *State v. Cody,*525 S.W.2d 333, 335 (Mo. banc 1975). Movant’s complaints of ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable on appeal because mov-ant waived those claims by voluntarily entering his pleas of guilty. The motion court properly denied movant’s motion on that ground.

The judgment is affirmed.

REINHARD and CRIST, JJ., concur.

1

. Rule 27.26 was repealed, effective January 1, 1988. However, this appeal is governed by Rule 27.26 because the sentence was pronounced pri- or to January 1, 1988, and movant’s Rule 27.26 motion was then pending. *See*Rule 24.035, effective January 1, 1988.
#### Casey *v.*McDaniel.

No. 2752.

September 16, 1922.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Fortson. Oconee superior court. June 25, 1921.

*J. D. Quillian,*for plaintiff. *W. M.*Smith, for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

1. It has been held by this court that *“*Where two parties entered into a written contract, whereby one of them was to let the other have fifty acres of land, and was to furnish sufficient stock to cultivate it, and the other was to furnish the labor, and they were to divide the crops, if the former failed to furnish the necessary plow-stock and took charge of the crops, in the absence of any allegation of insolvency, there was an ample remedy at law, and a resort to equity was unnecessary.” *Nicholson*v. *Cook,*76 *Ga.*24. See also *Bussell*V. *Bishop,*152 *Ga.*428 (110 S. E. 174). Applying the principle above stated, the judge did not err in refusing a temporary injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*