alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12870]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-412-602]


Certain Forged Steel Crankshafts From the United Kingdom; 
Extension of Time Limits of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limits of antidumping duty 
administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (The Department) is extending the 
time limits for preliminary and final results in the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain forged steel 
crankshafts from the United Kingdom, covering the period September 1, 
1994, through August 31, 1995, since it is not practicable to complete 
the review within the time limits mandated by the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1675(a) (the Act).

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
J. David Dirstine, Lyn Johnson, or Richard Rimlinger, Office of 
Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Department of Commerce has received a request to conduct an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain forged 
steel crankshafts from the United Kingdom. On October 12, 1995, the 
Department initiated this administrative review covering the period 
September 1, 1994, through August 31, 1995. The Department adjusted the 
time limits by 28 days due to the government shutdowns, which lasted 
from November 14, 1995, to November 20, 1995, and from December 15, 
1995, to January 6, 1996. See Memorandum to the file from Paul L. 
Joffe, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, January 
11, 1996. As adjusted, the current time limits are July 1, 1996, for 
the preliminary results and November 29, 1996, for the final results.
    It is not practicable to complete this review within the time 
limits mandated by section 751 (a)(3)(A) of the Act. See Memorandum 
from Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance to 
Paul L. Joffe, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
May 9, 1996. Therefore, in accordance with that section, the Department 
is extending the time limits for the preliminary results to November 
29, 1996, and for the final results to March 31, 1997.
    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(b).

    Dated: May 14, 1996.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 96-12870 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
#### Lester EMS and Sharon Ems, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHELTER MUTUAL INS. CO., et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 69095.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

June 28, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 1,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 17,1996.

Blair Kenneth Drazic, Creve Coeur, for appellants.

Russell F. Watters, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Lester and Sharon Ems, appeal the granting of a motion to dismiss three counts of their amended petition in favor of respondents, Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. and Bennett Webb. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-180-000]


Stingray Pipeline Company; Notice of Technical Conference

May 21, 1996.
    In the Commission's order issued April 19, 1996,\1\ the Commission 
held that the filing in the above captioned proceeding raises issues 
that should be addressed in a technical conference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Stingray Pipeline Co., 75 FERC para. 61,061 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Tuesday, 
June 18, 1996, at 1:00 p.m., in a room to be designated at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington D.C. 20426. All interested parties and Staff are permitted 
to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13223 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSENLLP 

 

On May 15, 2002, I-many, Inc. and subsidiaries (the“Company”) terminated the engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) as its independent accountants as Andersen’s offices in the State of Massachusetts were to close effective June 30, 2002. The decision to terminateAndersen was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and the Company’s Board of Directors. 

 

Andersen was the Company’s independent accountants. As a result of the closing of Andersen, we were unable to obtain the consent to Andersen to the incorporation by reference in our registrationstatements on Form S-8 Nos. 333-86958, 333-64974, 333-60162, and 333-41362 and in our registration statements on Form S-3 Nos. 333-68924, 333-76716, 333-85044 and 333-88714 of the audit report of Andersen with respect to our financial statements asof December 31, 2001 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. We have dispensed with the requirement under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) to file the consent of Andersen inreliance on Rule 437(a) under the Securities Act. Because Andersen has not consented to the incorporation by reference of their report in the registration statements identified above, purchasers of securities offered pursuant to those registrationstatements on or after the filing of this Form 10-K/A will not be able to recover against Andersen under Section 11 of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersenand incorporated by reference in those financial statements or any omission to state a material fact required to be stated in those financial statements.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 287 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to post on the public 

Internet site of the Office of the Clerk a record, organized by Member 

name, of recorded votes taken in the House, and directing each Member 

who maintains an official public Internet site to provide an electronic 

link to such record. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2009 

Ms. BEAN (for herself, Mr. COOPER, Mr. KIND, Mr. HELLER, Mr. FLAKE, 

and Mr. CAMPBELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to post 

on the public Internet site of the Office of the Clerk 

a record, organized by Member name, of recorded votes 

taken in the House, and directing each Member who 

maintains an official public Internet site to provide an 

electronic link to such record. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Voting Record 

4 Transparency Resolution’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 287 IH 

1 SEC. 2. RECORD OF RECORDED VOTES ON PUBLIC INTER2 NET SITE OF CLERK. 

3 (a) RESPONSIBILITIES OF CLERK.—The Clerk of the 

4 House of Representatives shall post on the public Internet 

5 site of the Office of the Clerk a record, organized by Mem6 ber name, of the recorded votes of each Member (including 

7 each Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress) 

8 taken in the House, including the roll, date, issue, ques9 tion, result, and title or description of the vote, and any 

10 cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office related 

11 to the vote. 

12 (b) LINKS ON MEMBER SITES.—Each Member (in13 cluding a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Con14 gress) who maintains an official public Internet site using 

15 amounts from the Members’ Representation Allowance 

16 shall provide a clearly presented electronic link on the site 

17 to the Member’s individual recorded vote information de18 scribed in subsection (a). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Sridhar Ganesan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of WorldSpace, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2006



/s/    SRIDHAR
GANESANSridhar GanesanExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12722]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-990-01-1020-00)]


Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: The Lower Snake River District Resource Advisory Council will 
conduct a field tour to examine U.S. Air Force proposed alternative 
locations for new target and emitter sites on public lands in Owyhee 
County.

DATES: June 3, 1996. The field tour will depart from the Lower Snake 
River District Office at 6:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The Lower Snake River District Office is located at 3948 
Development Avenue, Boise, Idaho

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Rose, Lower Snake River District 
Office (208-384-3393).

    Dated: May 15, 1996.
Barry Rose,
Public Affairs Specialist.
[FR Doc. 96-12722 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
================================================================================

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the Annual Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I,  David  Roff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    the  Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the  information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


     Dated: March 29, 2010


     /s/ "David Roff"


     David Roff
     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of The Honorable Franklin L.

Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3112

___________

Robert L. Straitt, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 4, 1997

 Filed: December 10, 1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert L. Straitt appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil

1

action. First, we deny Straitt’s motions for contempt. Second, having carefully

reviewed the record and Straitt’s brief, we conclude that dismissal was proper and that

an extended opinion is not necessary. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11683]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 10873-002 North Carolina]


Fall Line Hydro Company, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for License

May 6, 1996.
    Take notice that the Fall Line Hydro Company, Inc., applicant for 
the Cullasaja River Project No. 10873, located on the Cullasaja River, 
Macon County, North Carolina, has requested that its application for 
license be withdrawn. The applicant states that the project would be 
uneconomical due to the uncertainty that deregulation of the electrical 
utility industry has created.
    The applicant filed the request on April 22, 1996, and the 
withdrawal of the license application for Project No. 10873 will become 
effective 15 days after the filing date of the request for withdrawal, 
unless that day is a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, in which case the 
application shall remain pending through the first business day 
following that day. New applications involving this project site, to 
the extent provided for under 18 CFR Part 4, may be filed on the next 
business day.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11683 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELDER BENJAMIN CANUT-REYES, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73264 

Agency No. A071-581-897 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 11, 2019**

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Elder Benjamin Canut-Reyes, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from 

an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of 

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73264 

1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Canut-Reyes

failed to establish that his past harm rose to the level of persecution. See Lim v. 

INS, 224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir. 2000) (persecution is an “extreme concept” that 

includes the “infliction of suffering or harm”); Duran-Rodriguez v. Barr, 918 F.3d 

1025, 1028 (9th Cir. 2019) (threats alone “rarely constitute persecution”). 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Canut-Reyes

failed to establish the harm he fears in Guatemala would be on account of a 

protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An 

[applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or 

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). Thus, 

his withholding of removal claim fails.

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Canut-Reyes’ remaining 

contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts 

and agencies are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they 

reach). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, James G. Azlein, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BPI Industries Inc. (the“registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: January 9, 2006         /s/ James G. Azlein   By:    James G. Azlein,   President and Chief Executive Officer
*       *        *       *       *


EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of HXT Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date:
      May 14, 2009
              By:
      /s/Yuanqing
    LiYuanqing
      Li, Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      May 14, 2009
              By:
      /s/Dinghong
      ShenDinghong
      Shen, Chief Financial Officer