alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FURR’S SUPERMARKETS, INC., Relator, v. Honorable Virgil MULANAX, Judge Presiding, 346th District Court, El Paso County, Texas and Honorable Jose Baca, Judge, 346th District Court, El Paso County, Texas, Respondents.

No. 08-95-00083-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

March 23, 1995.

Rehearing Overruled April 12, 1995.

*443Mark C. Walker, Mounce & Galatzan, El Paso, for relator.

James F. Seherr, Scherr & Lagate, P.C., El Paso, for respondents.

Before BARAJAS, C.J., and McCLURE and CHEW, JJ.

*OPINION ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS*

CHEW, Justice.

Furr’s Supermarkets, Inc., (“FSI”) seeks mandamus relief from a trial court discovery order requiring FSI to produce certain documents. The trial court held a hearing on the discovery dispute on November 18, 1994. The record reflects that the trial court made an oral ruling on the dispute that day. The discovery order was not signed until February 17,1995. The record does not reflect the reason for the delay in signing the order. The order required FSI to produce documents by March 17, 1995. The record does not reflect whether the trial court’s oral ruling required production by March 17. On the afternoon of March 17, the day the documents were to be produced, FSI filed its Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus seeking relief from the discovery order. We find that FSI’s Motion for Leave is barred by laches. Accordingly, we deny FSI’s Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

*DISCUSSION*

It is important to keep in mind that mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, not issued as a matter of right, but at the discretion of the court. *Rivercenter Associates v. Rivera,*858 S.W.2d 866, 367 (Tex.1993). Although mandamus is a legal remedy, its issuance is largely controlled by equitable principles. *Id.*This Court has made mandamus available to correct a trial court error which negatively and substantially affects the rights of parties to litigate their cases, whether the particular party is seeking or resisting discovery. However, a long delay in filing a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus can result in the motion’s being denied because of laches. *J.K. and Susie L. Wadley Research Institute and Blood Bank v. Whittington,*843 S.W.2d 77, 83 (Tex. App. — Dallas 1992, orig. proceeding); *Bailey v. Baker,*696 S.W.2d 255, 256 (Tex.App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1985, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). In this case, FSI filed its motion on the day the documents were to be produced, four months after the oral ruling and one month after the order was signed. FSI offers no justification for the delay. On this record, we find none.

Accordingly, we deny FSI’s Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7740

MONTUSA KARUNDO T. PACE, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00148-JBF-TEM)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 24, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Montusa Karundo T. Pace, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Montusa Karundo T. Pace seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pace has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, George J. Zilich, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BPI Industries Inc. (the “registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 15, 2006         /s/ George J. Zilich   By: George J. Zilich,   Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25886-25887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12896]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CO-030-06-1610-00-1784]


Southwest Colorado Resource Advisory Council Meetings

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; Resource Advisory Council meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 USC), 
notice is hereby given that the Southwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council (SW RAC) will meet on Thursday, June 13, 1996, at the Gunnison 
County Electric Association conference room, 37250 US Highway 50, 
Gunnison, Colorado, and on Thursday, July 11, 1996, at the Silverton 
Visitor Center, 414 Greene, Silverton, Colorado.

DATES: The meetings will be held on Thursday, June 13, 1996, and on 
Thursday, July 11, 1996. Both meetings will begin at 9:00 a.m. and end 
at 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact Roger Alexander, Bureau of 
Land Management, Montrose District Office, 2465 South Townsend Avenue, 
Montrose, Colorado 81401; Telephone 970-249-7791; TDD 970-249-4639.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The June 13, 1996, meeting is scheduled to 
begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Gunnison County Electric Association 
conference room, 37250 US Highway 50, approximately two and one-half 
miles west of Gunnison, Colorado. The agenda will focus on internal 
resource advisory council business, including future meeting schedules, 
issue identification, and overall RAC direction, and an evaluation of 
the past year's meetings. Time will be provided for public comments.
    The Thursday, July 11, 1996, is scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m. at 
the Silverton Visitors Center, 414 Greene, Silverton, Colorado. The 
agenda will focus on off-highway vehicle and other recreational use, 
historical resources, and the clean-up of the Animas River. Time will 
be provided for public comments.
    All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council, or written 
statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. Depending 
on the number of persons wishing to make oral statements, a per-person 
time limit may be established by the Montrose District Manager.
    Summary minutes for the Council meeting will be maintained in the 
Montrose District Office and will be

[[Page 25887]]

available for public inspection and reproduction during regular 
business hours within thirty (30) days following the meeting.

    Dated: May 13, 1996.
Mark W. Stiles,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-12896 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 530 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 530

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 15, 2009.
Whereas the third annual Civil Rights Baseball Game is being held in Cincinnati, 
        Ohio, at the Great American Ballpark on June 20, 2009;
Whereas the Cincinnati Reds, the host of the Civil Rights Baseball Game, are 
        recognized as being the first professional baseball team in the United 
        States;
Whereas the Major League Baseball Civil Rights Game was created to honor those 
        who fought both on and off the field for the equal treatment of all 
        people;
Whereas baseball was at the forefront of the civil rights movement and was 
        integrated before either the Armed Forces or the public schools;
Whereas Cincinnati, Ohio, was home to the Negro League's Cincinnati Tigers from 
        1934 to 1937;
Whereas Cincinnati, Ohio, was an integral stop along the Underground Railroad as 
        one of the first free ``stations'' slaves would encounter when escaping 
        north; and
Whereas Cincinnati, Ohio, is home to the National Underground Railroad Freedom 
        Center, which opened in 2004: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commend the purpose of the third annual Civil Rights Baseball 
        Game; and
            (2) recognize the historical significance of the location of the 
        Civil Rights Baseball Game in Cincinnati, Ohio.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### NO. COURT OF APPEALS NO. 06-14-00165-CR 

### in the KfcCEIVEDIN COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS OFTEXAS COURTOFCRIMINALAPPALS 

### MAY 222015 BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW, A( ,A 

## Appellant/Petitioner AbelAcOSta,Cleit


## THE STATEOFTEXAS, FILEDIN 

# Appellee/Respondent COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS ; MAY 2<J2G»5 On appeal from the Sixth Court of Appeals 

## Texarkana, Texas AbelAcosta,Clerk
PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR FILING HIS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

### NOW COMES, BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW, Appellant/Petitioner, and respectfully requests that the time for the filing of Petitioner's Petition for Discretionary Review in the above styled and numbered cause be extended. In support of this motion Petitioner would show 

### the Court the following: I. Petitioner was convicted of continuous sexual assault of a 

### child and was sentenced to 60 years' imprisonment. OnMay 5, 2015, inOpinion No. 06-14-00165-CR, the Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court.The Petitioner's Petition for Discretionary Review is due on or before June 4, 2015. Petitioner respectfully requests an ex tension of time until August 3, 2015. 

### in. No previous extensions of time has been requested. IV. Petitioner would show the Court that he is currently incar cerated in the Mark W. Michael Unit of the TDCJ-CID and has lim ited access to the law library. PRAYER 

### WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Petitioner respectfully re 

### quests that the time for filing the Petitioner's Petition for Dis cretionary Review be extended until August 3, 2015. Respectfully submitted,
BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW PETITIONER TDCJ No. 01942978 Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054 Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore going motion has been served by placing same in the United States 

### Mail, postage prepaid, on the 15th day of May, 2015, addressed to: Rusk County District Attorney and State Prosecuting Attorney.

BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW PETITIONER
November 21, 2000



Board of Directors
Arena Resources, Inc.
4920 South Lewis Street, Suite 107
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74105

       RE:      Opinion on Legality of SB-1Registration

Dear Arena Board of Directors:

         Our  office  has been asked by Mr. Tim  Rochford,  your  president,  to
prepare for the Board of  Directors  an opinion on the  legality of the proposed
Registration pending before the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form SB-1.
In  response  to that  request,  it is the  opinion  of our  office  that  Arena
Resources, Inc. is a Nevada corporation in good standing and is fully capable of
completing and filing a Registration  Statement on Form SB-1 with the Securities
Exchange   Commission  and  otherwise   registering  such  Offering  in  various
jurisdictions  where the  Offering  may be sold.  It is also the  opinion of the
undersigned that the securities covered by the Registration Statement will, when
sold, be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

         Our office has been further  advised  that your Board of Directors  has
approved and  authorized a  Registration  Statement  and its filing and the same
constitutes  the basis for this  opinion  that the  Company can and may effect a
registration  of its  securities  as  presently  proposed  in the  current  SB-1
Registration  Statement as filed.  It is also the opinion of our office that the
SB-1 Registration Statement constitutes an apparent adequate and complete filing
under the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act of 1933,  though such opinion does not
intimate or mean that the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission may not require,
and most likely will require,  various amendments,  supplements,  and changes to
the  Prospectus  or  other  parts  of the  Registration  Statement  before  such
Registration may become effective.  It is further  understood and agreed between
the undersigned and the Company that this letter will be required to be filed as
a Exhibit to the  Registration  Statement.  If you have any questions  regarding
this opinion, please contact the undersigned at your earliest convenience.

                                                              Sincerely,



                                                        By: /s/ Julian D. Jensen
                                                        ------------------------
                                                                Julian D. Jensen
                                                                Attorney at Law

                                       1
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 459 

Expressing support for designation of ‘‘National Safety Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2009 

Mr. ROSKAM (for himself and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of ‘‘National Safety 

Month’’. 

Whereas, after years of decline, the rate of unintentional injuries and deaths in the United States has reversed and 

has reached unacceptably high levels in recent years; 

Whereas deaths from motor vehicle collisions, poisonings from 

unintentional overdoses, and falls remain as the three 

leading causes of preventable death in the United States; 

Whereas the cost of unintentional injuries to people in the 

United States exceeds $684,400,000,000 each year and 

causes great suffering among individuals and their families; 

Whereas the cost of unintentional injuries to workers and 

their employers is $175,300,000,000 each year, including 

the value of 114,000,000 days of lost productivity; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 459 IH 

Whereas preventing unintentional injury and death requires 

the cooperation of all levels of government, the Nation’s 

employers, and the general public; 

Whereas the National Safety Council, founded in 1913, was 

congressionally chartered in 1953 to lead this Nation in 

injury prevention through safety and health education, 

training, and advocacy in the United States; 

Whereas the National Safety Council educates the workforce 

about policies, practices, and procedures leading to increased safety, protection, and health in business and industry, as well as in schools and colleges, on roads and 

highways, and in homes and communities; 

Whereas since the summer season is a time of increased rates 

of preventable injuries and death, it is an appropriate 

time to focus the attention of our workforce and community leaders on injury risks and preventions by celebrating June 2009 as ‘‘National Safety Month’’; and 

Whereas the National Safety Council in 2009 as part of its 

public education about safety and health will provide this 

Nation a monthlong campaign in June: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Safe3 ty Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the contributions of the National 

5 Safety Council and its ongoing commitment to rais6 ing awareness about the need for the implementation 

7 of safe practices in our schools and jobs; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 459 IH 

1 (3) encourages citizens to observe the ‘‘National 

2 Safety Month’’ with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 educate themselves about the importance of imple4 menting safe practices in our schools and on our 

5 jobs to prevent unintentional injury and death. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 52 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 52

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 14, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2) to amend title XXI of the Social 
Security Act to extend and improve the Children's Health Insurance Program and 
for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against the bill are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among 
and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce and the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kolela Mpoyo,

Plaintiff,

v. 

FIS Management Services LLC,

Defendant.

NO. CV-17-04307-PHX-SPL

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came for consideration before the Court. The 

issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court’s Order filed

December 6, 2019, which granted the Motion for Summary Judgment, judgment is 

entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the 

complaint and action are dismissed with prejudice.

Brian D. Karth

District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

December 6, 2019

s/ Rebecca Kobza

By Deputy Clerk

Case 2:17-cv-04307-SPL Document 100 Filed 12/06/19 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13190]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service


Commissioner's Advisory Group: Public Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting of Commissioner's Advisory Group.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public meeting of the Commissioner's Advisory Group (CAG) will 
be held in Washington, DC.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 20, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merci del Toro at (202) 622-5081 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), 
that a public meeting of the CAG will be held on June 20, 1996, 
beginning at 10 a.m. in Room 3313, main Internal Revenue Service 
building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. The 
agenda will include the following topics: various IRS issue updates and 
reports by the CAG subgroups on Compliance, Small Business, and 
Improving Services to Customers.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda or order of topic 
discussion are possible and could prevent effective advance notice.

    The meeting will be in a room that accommodates approximately 50 
people, including members of the Commissioner's Advisory Group and IRS 
officials. Due to the limited conference space and security 
specifications, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be 
made with Lorenza Wilds. Ms. Wilds can be reached on (202) 622-6440 
(not toll-free). Attendees are encouraged to allow enough time to clear 
security at the 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW entrance.
    If you would like to have the Committee consider a written 
statement, please call or write: Merci del Toro, Office of Public 
Liaison, C:I, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
room 3308 IR, Washington, DC 20224.

    Dated: May 17, 1996.
Margaret Milner Richardson,
Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[FR Doc. 96-13190 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U