alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David E. Siminoff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Spark Networks plc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ David E. Siminoff                    
|David E. Siminoff Chief Executive
Officer

August 11, 2006
Case 2:17-cr-01456-SPL   Document 1   Filed 10/31/17   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of pSivida Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Ashton, Managing Director of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2008



|                   |  |                  
|------------------ |  | -----------------
|/s/    Paul Ashton
|Name:              |  | Paul Ashton      
|Title:             |  | Managing Director
Case 2:17-cr-01429-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/07/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01429-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/07/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01429-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/07/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01429-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/07/17 Page 4 of 4
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEFFREY M. SISKIND,

Appellant,

v.

SOFIYE WILLIAMS, ESQUIRE, SOFIYE WILLIAMS, P.A., TERESA 

SANTALUCIA, BELMAR WINDS, INC., and ROBERT A. GIBSON,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-3441

[February 9, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Bradley Harper, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA-004316-

XXXX-MB.

Jeffrey M. Siskind of Siskind Legal, PLLC, Wellington, for appellant.

Sofiye Williams of Sofiye Williams, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees 

Sofiye Williams, Sofiye Williams, P.A., and Belmar Winds, Inc.

Robert Gibson, Lake Worth, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### William Edward JOHNSON, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64297.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 1, 1994.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant, William Edward Johnson, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

*463The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Kaufman Wrecking Corp., Respondent, *v.*Ranes Construction Corp., et al., Defendants, and National Surety Corp., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 23, 1956.

*848
      *Murray B. Trayman, Max E. Greenberg*and *Norman Kapp*for appellant.

*Aaron H. Schwartz*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Section 18 of the Lien Law, applicable to mechanic’s liens on contracts for a public improvement, provides that they shall expire, where not continued by order, unless within six months from the time of filing the notice of lien an action to foreclose be commenced as well as a notice of pendency of such action be filed. It is explicitly provided that these requirements apply even though an undertaking be substituted for the lien and the lien thereby discharged. Accordingly, the first cause of action being to establish such a lien, it is not maintainable for failure to file a notice of pendency of the action within the prescribed time. *(Catapano*v. *Clemente,*85 N. Y. S. 2d 764, affd. 274 App. Div. 995.) In *White Plains Sash & Door Co.*v. *Doyle*(262 N. Y. 16) urged upon us by plaintiff, the court found that section 17 dealing with liens on real property, there involved, contained an express provision that as to such liens a *lis pendens*need not be filed where the lien had been discharged by deposit or order. No such provision appears in section 18, which governs this action, and we may not read it into the section despite the declaration therein that the section shall be liberally construed. Its omission from section 18 must be held to be deliberate, since it has been part of section 17 (the corresponding provision as to declaration of liens on real property) for years and numerous decisions of the courts, including the *White Plains Sash*case, have discussed its meaning and effect.

*849The branch of the motion of defendant National Surety Corp. addressed to rule 113 should therefore have been granted. As it is a defendant solely by virtue of the first cause of action, it was entitled to a dismissal of the complaint as against it.

In view of this disposition, it is unnecessary to pass upon the question raised on the branch of the motion under rule 106.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted dismissing the complaint as against defendant National Surety Corp.

Hofstadter, Eder and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Presidential Documents 24667

Memorandum of April 26, 1996

Suspension of the Proviso Limiting Implementation of Subsections (a), (b), (c), (e), (g), or (i) of the Endangered Species

Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533) Contained in the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 (H.R.

3019)

Memorandum for the Secretary of the Interior [and] the Secretary of

Commerce

By the authority vested in me by the final proviso under the heading

of United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Management, of title

I of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations

Act, 1996 (authorizing the suspension of the preceding proviso limiting

implementation of subsections (a), (b), (c), (e), (g), or (i) of section 4 of

the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533) (‘‘limitation proviso’’)),

and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby suspend that limitation

proviso because I have determined that such suspension is appropriate based

upon the public interest in sound environmental management, sustainable

resource use, protection of national or locally-affected interests, and protection of cultural, biological, or historic resources.

This suspension is effective immediately and shall continue until the

limitation proviso expires.

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to report this suspension to

the Congress and to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

[FR Doc. 96–12242

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, April 26, 1996.

œ–

Filed 5–15–96; 8:45]

Billing code 4310–10–M
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25733-25734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12798]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

[Docket No. M-017]

Information Collection Available for Public Comments and 
Recommendations

AGENCY: Maritime Administration.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Maritime Administration's (MARAD's) intentions to 
request extension of approval for three years of a currently approved 
information collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before July 22, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda C. Somerville, Division of 
Vessel Transfer and Disposal, Maritime Administration, MAR-631, Room 
7324,

[[Page 25734]]

400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202-366-5821 
or fax 202-366-3889. Copies of this collection can also be obtained 
from that office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title of Collection: Trustee's Supplemental Certification.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved information 
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2133-0015.
    Form Number: MA-580.
    Expiration Date of Approval: August 31, 1996.
    Summary of Collection of Information: Provide for approval of banks 
and trust companies to act as Trustees under certain ship financing 
trusts and provide a procedure for assuring the validity and preferred 
status of mortgages on U.S. flag vessels and certain mortgages 
requiring Secretarial approval. The approved bank or trust company is 
required to furnish its supplemental certification every five years in 
order to remain on the Roster of Approved Trustees. The processing fee 
for this application is $215.00 per filing.
    Need and Use of the Information: Information collection provides 
information that will be used by the Maritime Administration to 
determine whether the bank or trust company continues to meet the 
statutory requirements to serve as Trustees.
    Description of Respondents: Banks and trust companies.
    Annual Responses: 68.
    Annual Burden: 51 hours.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Joel C. Richard, Department of Transportation, Maritime 
Administration, MAR-120, Room 7210, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20590. Send comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for proper performance of the function of the 
agency and will have practical utility, accuracy of the burden 
estimates, ways to minimize this burden, and ways to enhance quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12798 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1203

JAMES E. SLATE, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

No. 09-1204

JAMES E. SLATE, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General; JEFFREY F. PEROTTA, 

Labor Relations Manager; ROY L. MONTAGUE, Postmaster, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:04-cv-00782-JAB; 1:05-cv-00221-JAB-PTS) 

Submitted: January 29, 2010 Decided: February 16, 2010 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

James E. Slate, Appellant Pro Se. David Clifford Belt, UNITED 

STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington D.C.; Lynne P. Klauer, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; 

Shari A. Rose, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C. for 

Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

James E. Slate appeals the district court’s order 

granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Slate’s 

civil actions. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See Slate v. Potter, Nos. 1:04-cv-00782-

JAB; 1:05-cv-00221-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 22075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11813]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD


Notice of Toll Free Information Line

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.

ACTION: The Merit Systems Protection Board announces it toll free 
information line.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) has installed a 
toll free information line for customers to check on the status of 
their appeals, request copies of Board studies and publications, and 
receive general information. MSPB customers--Federal employees, 
agencies, and the general public--will hear a recorded announcement 
that will guide them through menu selections to route their requests to 
the appropriate MSPB office mailbox. Calls will be returned promptly or 
requests will be satisfied appropriately. The toll free number is 1-
800-209-8960.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Ealey, Office of the Clerk of the Board (202) 653-7200.

    Dated: May 7, 1996.
Robert E. Taylor,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-11813 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-M
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.18    
    


[OPTIMER
LOGO] 


August 30,
2001 


Dr.
Tessie M. Che

[address] 


Dear
Dr. Che: 


It
is with great pleasure for me to invite you to join Optimer Pharmaceutical, Inc. team in the capacity of Vice President of Corporate Affairs, reporting to the CEO. You will be responsible for all
the activities in Corporate Affairs. 


Associated
with this opportunity, we offer the following compensation: 



	1.
	Annual
base salary: $180,000 US Dollars.



	2.
	Optimer
offers a competitive benefit package that includes medical and dental coverage for you and your family, 401(k) plan, and Group Term Life Insurance for you.



	3.
	Stock
Options: You are offered initially 180,000 shares of Stock Options, vest equally over a four-year period with one-year cliff and vesting monthly thereafter. The share option
price shall be 30 cents per share and you can exercise your options within 10 years after vesting.



	4.
	Four
weeks of paid vacation annually. 




If
you agree to the offer as stated above, please sign and return a copy of this letter to Jodi Ross in Human Resources. 


Sincerely, 


[SIGNATURE
TO COME]

Michael N. Chang

CEO

Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 



	
 I accept the offer as stipulated above:	

/s/ Dr. Tessie M. Che
 Dr. Tessie M. Che	
 	

9-06-01
 Date













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.18
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1082** 

MICHAEL A. MCNEIL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. FEDERAL NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 01501

- WDQ )

Submitted : April 17, 2014 Decided: April 22, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael A. McNeil , Appellant Pro Se. Menachem Lanner , John Edward McCann, Jr., Jessica Anna

- Christina duHoffmann , MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, PC , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIA M:
Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1673
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district

court. McNeil v. Federal Network Sys

. , LLC , No. 1:13

- cv - 01501

- WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21218-21219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11623]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 500-1]


Lanstar Semiconductor, Inc.; Order Directing Suspension of 
Trading

May 3, 1996.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of adequate current information concerning the securities of 
Lanstar Semiconductor, Inc., a Utah corporation with executive offices 
in Arlington, Texas, and that questions have been raised regarding the 
adequacy and accuracy of publicly disseminated information concerning, 
among other things, unusual market activity and the tradeability of 
shares.
    Therefore, it is Ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of 
Lanstar Semiconductor, Inc., over-the-counter or otherwise, is 
suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. (EDT) on May 6, 1996, through 
11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 17, 1996.


[[Page 21219]]


    By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11623 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by
YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended September 30, 2003
(the "Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                        |                         |  | 
|----------------------- | ----------------------- |  | 
|/s/JONATHAN V. DIAMOND  |                         | 
|Name:                   | Jonathan V. Diamond     |  | 
|Title:                  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|Date:                   | March 5, 2004           |  | 
|                        |                         |  | 
|/s/ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN |                         | 
|Name:                   | Robert N. Weingarten    |  | 
|Title:                  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|Date:                   | March 5, 2004           |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           INTEGRITY BANCSHARES, INC.

                                       I.

      The name of the corporation is Integrity Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Corporation").

                                       II.

      The text of Article 4 of the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation is
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following text:

      "The Corporation shall have authority to issue up to Fifty Million
      (50,000,000) shares of common stock (the "Common Stock")."

                                      III.

      All other provisions of the Articles of Incorporation shall remain in full
force and effect.

                                       IV.

      This amendment was adopted on May 18, 2005 and has not been modified or
rescinded.

                                       V.

      This amendment was approved by the Corporation's shareholders in
accordance with the provisions of Section 14-2-1003 of the Georgia Business
Corporation Code.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment
to be executed and attested by its duly authorized officers.

                           INTEGRITY BANCSHARES, INC.

                           By: /s/ Jeff L. Sanders
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Jeff L. Sanders
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                                [CORPORATE SEAL]
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12993]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 14, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-12993 Filed 5-20-96; 1:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M