alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 289 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 32
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 289

                          [Report No. 111-57]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2009

    Ms. Matsui, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported through the legislative day of March 30, 2009, 
providing for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 1388) to 
reauthorize and reform the national service laws, an amendment thereto, 
or a conference report thereon.
                                                  House Calendar No. 32

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 289

                          [Report No. 111-57]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 26, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

** 71 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 1995), opinion clarified, 77 F.3d

811 (5th Cir. 1996).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10162

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:92-CR-25-1-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

November 20, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Claude Johnson appeals the district court’s

revocation of his supervised release. Johnson argues that the

attestation affixed to a positive urinalysis report failed to

comply with the requirements set forth in United States v.

Grandlund** and that the district court committed reversible

error by admitting the report into evidence.
No. 98-10162

-2-

Even if the district court erred in admitting the short-form

attestation, such error was harmless. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 52(a). 

The report of the January urinalysis was not the only evidence

that Johnson violated the conditions of his supervised release. 

At the original revocation hearing, Johnson pleaded “true” to

three allegations of drug use, and there is no indication that he

moved to withdraw that plea. The district court’s judgment

revoking Johnson’s supervised release is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Robert deRose, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Education Lending Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    Robert deRose                              
|                     |  |     |  | Name: Robert deRose Title: Cheif Executive
Officer
<PAGE>


          Exhibit 10.12(c)


          PriceSmart, Inc.
          4649 Morena Blvd.
          San Diego, CA  92117
          Tel 858 581-7485
          Fax 858 581-4707


          To:     Thomas D. Martin

          From:   Allan C. Youngberg

          Re:     AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

          Date:   November 22, 1999


          This will confirm that, effective as of October 1, 1999, the Base
          Salary under your Employment Agreement with PriceSmart, Inc. was
          increased, from $155,000 to $170,000.

          Your Employment Agreement is deemed amended accordingly. All other
          terms and conditions of your Employment Agreement remain the same.

          Please sign below acknowledging the foregoing, and return a copy of
          this document, with your signature, to me.


          Dated:  November 23, 1999


          /s/ Allan C. Youngberg
          ----------------------
          Allan C. Youngberg


          Dated:  November 29, 1999


          /s/ Thomas D. Martin
          ----------------------
          Thomas D. Martin
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1320]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

Advisory Committee Meeting; Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an 
amendment to the notice of meeting of the Vaccines and Related 
Biological Products Advisory Committee. This meeting was announced in 
the Federal Register of December 27, 1995 (60 FR 66978 at 66979). The 
amendment is being made to reflect a change in the meeting place for 
the meeting. The meeting times and agenda remain the same.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandy M. Salins or Nancy T. Cherry, 
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Scientific Advisors and 
Consultants Staff (HFM-21), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-1294.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of December 27, 
1995, FDA announced that a meeting of the Vaccines and Related 
Biological Products Advisory Committee would be held on January 29, 30, 
and 31, 1996. On page 66979, in the first column, the ``Date, time, and 
place'' portion of the meeting is amended to read as follows:
    -Date, time, and place. January 29, 30, and 31, 1996, 8 a.m., 
DoubleTree Hotel, Plaza Ballroom, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD.

    Dated: January 22, 1996.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 96-1320 Filed 1-23-96; 10:51 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **GROVER SELLERS**  ***TrwwLI GENERAL** 

Honorable Worth i3. Durham County Attorney Sterling county Sterling City, Texas Dear Sir: Opinton No, O-7121

Wehave re hereinabove oapti follows: opinion on the your latter as
Sterling County, Texas. yhas apopulation of

ompiling the permanent county records, axRolls, DaedRecords, Deeds of Trust age Reoorda, etc. The question has arisen as to whether the expenses of repairs andmaintenanoe of such equipment ie properly chargeable to fees earned by the offiosra using such squipment, or maysuoh expenses **be** paid by the CommisaionersV Court out of county funds.Eon. Worth B. Durham, page 2
”uer ; Are the expenses of repairs andmaintenanoa of coun y-owned typewrlters, adding maohines and like iE-y equipment, used solely in compilation of permanent county reoorda, payable out of fees of office of county officials using such equipment?v Ssotion (a), Artiole 3699, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, reads in part a8follows:

“At the close of each month of his tenure of offioe, each officer namedherein whois compensated onafee baais shall make, as part of the report 

### nowrequired by law, an itemized and sworn etatement of all the actual andneoessary expenses incurred byhimin the conduct of his offioe such a8stationary, stamps, telephone, premiums on officials’ bonds including the cost of surety bonds 

### for hla deputies, premium on fire, burglary, theft, robbery inauranoe proteating publio funds, traveling expenses, and other necessary expenses; provided, that in addition to the offlaere namedherein, the oounty treasurer, oounty auditor;’ oounty road commissioners, county school superintendent, and the hide andanimal inspeotor shall likewise makea’report on the premiums on offlolala~ bonds, including the cost of surety bonds for any deputies, and said premiums ahall be subject to payment out of the fees of said office, as herein otherwise provided for the offioers named;

. . .I1 In the oaae of State vs. Carnes, et al, 106S. W. (26) 397, the **court** said:

*Under article 3899, Revised Civil Statutes as amended, Acta 1933, 43dLeg., p. 734, c. 220, 84, which waain force during 1934, the expenses, 

### other than 

### thoae expendFturea in oonnection with automobiles, whioh an officer is authorized to claim aa deductions under this provision, are limited to stationery, stamps, telephone, traveling expense, and other similar necessary expenses, the **rule** of ejuedem geheris being applied to qualify the general language by the apeolficelly enumerated items andto restrict its meaning to expenses of the samekind or class. Cameron County v. Fox (Tex.Civ.App.) 42 5. **W.** (;a) 653; Casey v. State (Tex.Civ.App.) 289S. VS.428 (writ of error refused).”Hon. Worth B. Durham, page 3

Theexpenses of repairing andmaintaining oounty-owned typewritera, adding maohines and likequipment are not expensee of the samekind or olaea as those namedLnArt. 3899, supra, and it ieherefore our opinion that said expenses are not payable out of the fees of offioe of the oounty officials in afee county. Yours very truly, ATTORNEY

GANS&IL OFTAM

BY
**Assistant**
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Paul O. NORFOLK, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67591.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 21, 1996.

John M. Schilomoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMol994, and stealing, third offense §§ 570.030 and 570.040. The trial court sentenced him as a persistent and Class X offender to two concurrent 20 year terms. He appeals the judgment and sentences.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of DDi Corp. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period endingDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Bruce D.McMaster, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and result of    operations of the Company.     /s/ BRUCE D. MCMASTER       **Bruce D. McMaster** **President and Chief Executive Officer**August 17, 2005
#### Wilda BRADEN, et al., Appellants, v. BENNINGTON CHAPEL, et al., Respondents.

No. WD 47490.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 1, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied June 21, 1994.

*633Daniel D. Lane, Independence, for appellants.

Aaron Sachs, Springfield, James H. Ensz, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before BERREY, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former members of the governing board of Bennington Chapel sued the pastor and the current board members of the church seeking, *inter alia,*to oust the defendants from their corporate offices. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants. Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seifi Ghasemi,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 11, 2009               |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                         |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Andrew SPENCER, Defendant/Appellant. Andrew SPENCER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60625, 61718.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 16, 1993.

Susan K. Eckles, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*647Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted under § 195.-202, RSMo 1986, of illegal possession of cocaine, a controlled substance. The trial court found defendant was a prior drug offender pursuant to § 195.285, RSMo 1986, and sentenced him to twelve years in the Department of Corrections. He appeals from that judgment.

We have considered each point defendant raised on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We affirm the judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 30.25.

In addition, defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion. An evidentiary hearing was conducted. The motion court filed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and an order denying the motion.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The motion court’s order is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Four Rivers BioEnergy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Gary Hudson, President and Chief Executive Officer and Martin Thorp, Chief Financial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Four Rivers BioEnergy Inc. and will be retained by Four Rivers BioEnergy Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                         |                                                                                
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 16, 2008 | /s/ Gary Hudson                                                                
|                         | Gary Hudson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



|                         |                                                                   
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 16, 2008 | /s/ Martin Thorp                                                  
|                         | Martin Thorp
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Regis
      Kwong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




I,
      John
      Bi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




By:
            /s/
                Regis
                KwongRegis
                KwongChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive
              Officer)By:
            /s/
                John BiJohn
                BiChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)




November
      14, 2008