Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Notices 25857

interstate parking and lending services,

as described below, performed under

Section 311(a)(2) of the Natural Gas

Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA):

Parking:

Minimum Daily Rate ($/Dth): $0.00

Maximum Daily Rate ($/Dth): $0.1071

Maximum Annual Transaction Charge ($/

Dth): $0.6083

Lending:

Minimum Daily rate ($/Dth): $0.00

Maximum Daily Rate ($/Dth): $0.1071

Maximum Annual Transaction Charge ($/

Dth): $0.6083

Pacific Gas and Electric’s mailing

address is 77 Beale Street, mail Code

B30A, San Francisco, CA 94105.

Pacific Gas and Electric’s petition

states it is a Hinshaw pipeline within

the meaning of Section 1 (c) of the

Natural Gas Act (NGA), transporting and

distributing gas throughout large

portions of northern and central

California to numerous residential,

industrial, and agricultural gas

consumers. On June 21, 1994, the

Commission issued Pacific Gas and

Electric a limited jurisdiction blanket

certificate under Part 284.224 of the

regulations to engage in the sale,

transportation, and assignment of

natural gas subject to the NGA in the

same manner that intrastate pipelines

are authorized to engage in such

activity.

This petition is intended to establish

rates for new interruptible parking and

lending services on Pacific Gas and

Electric’s pipeline system within its

service territory. These services will be

designated as ‘‘market center’’ or ‘‘hub’’

services as part of its newly created

Golden Gate Market Center. Parking

provides customers with temporary

storage of gas on an interruptible basis.

Lending provides interruptible

temporary loans of gas from Pacific Gas

and Electric’s system. These services

will be offered at the points Pacific Gas

and Electric’s system interconnects with

interstate pipelines, and at its Kern

River Station. Pacific Gas and Electric

proposes an effective date of June 1,

1996.

Any person desiring to participate in

this rate proceeding must file a motion

to intervene with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street

N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, in

accordance with sections 385.211 and

385.214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedures. All motions

must be filed with the Secretary of the

Commission on or before June 3, 1996.

The petition for rate approval is on file

with the Commission and is available

for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12908 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project No. 2019–000]

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Notice of

Authorization for Continued Project

Operation

May 17, 1996.

On May 5, 1994, Pacific Gas and

Electric Company, licensee for the Utica

Project No. 2019, filed an application for

a new or subsequent license pursuant to

the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the

Commission’s regulations thereunder.

Project No. 2019 is located on the North

Fork Stanislaus River and Silver,

Beaver, Mill, and Angels Creeks in

Calaveras. Toulumne, and Alpine

Counties, California.

The license for Project No. 2019 was

issued for a period ending May 8, 1996.

Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C.

808(a)(1), requires the Commission, at

the expiration of a license term, to issue

from year to year an annual license to

the then licensee under the terms and

conditions of the prior license until a

new license is issued, or the project is

otherwise disposed of as provided in

Section 15 or any other applicable

section of the FPA. If the project’s prior

license waived the applicability of

Section 15 of the FPA, then, based on

Section 9(b) of the Administrative

Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as

set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the

licensee of such project has filed an

application for a subsequent license, the

licensee may continue to operate the

project in accordance with the terms

and conditions of the license after the

minor or minor part license expires,

until the Commission acts on its

application. If the licensee of such a

project has not filed an application for

a subsequent license, then it may be

required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b),

to continue project operations until the

Commission issues someone else a

license for the project or otherwise

orders disposition of the project.

If the project is subject to Section 15

of the FPA, notice is hereby given that

an annual license for Project No. 2019

is issued to Pacific Gas and Electric

Company for a period effective May 9,

1996, through May 8, 1997, or until the

issuance of a new license for the project

or other disposition under the FPA,

whichever comes first. If issuance of a

new license (or other disposition) does

not take place on or before May 8, 1997,

notice is hereby given that, pursuant to

18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license

under Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is

renewed automatically without further

order or notice by the Commission,

unless the Commission orders

otherwise.

If the project is not subject to Section

15 of the FPA, notice is hereby given

that Pacific Gas and Electric Company is

authorized to continue operation of the

Utica Project No. 2019 until such time

as the Commission acts on its

application for subsequent license.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12910 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP96–116–001]

South Georgia Natural Gas Company;

Notice of Revised Refund Report

May 17, 1996.

Take notice that on April 15, 1996,

South Georgia Natural Gas Company

(South Georgia) tendered for filing with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission a revised refund report of

the interruptible transportation (IT)

revenues from the 1994–95 winter

season. South Georgia states that the

revised refund report is in compliance

with the Commission’s order issued

March 14, 1996, in Docket No. RP96–

116–000.

South Georgia states that the report

reflects a one-time adjustment of the IT

revenue credits to South Georgia’s firm

shippers, with the Municipal Gas

Authority and its member cities being

treated as a single entity when

determining the allocation of the IT

revenue credits. South Georgia states

that upon the Commission’s approval of

the revised refund calculation, South

Georgia will make adjustments to each

affected shipper’s bill.

South Georgia states that a copy of the

revised refund report was sent to each

of South Georgia’s affected shippers.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC.

20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.21). All such

motions or protests must be filed on or

before May 24, 1996. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the
25858 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Notices

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12905 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP96–238–000]

Texas Gas Transmission Corporation;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

May 17, 1996.

Take notice that on May 15, 1996,

Texas Gas Transmission Corporation

(Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of

its FERC Gas Tariff, the tariff sheets

listed on Appendix A attached to the

filing and requests the tariff sheets to be

effective June 15, 1996.

Texas Gas states that this filing is

being made to clean up Texas Gas’s

FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume

No. 1, to reflect various revisions that

include: policies established by Order

No. 582; correction of typographical

errors and housekeeping items; updates

since the initial issuance of Volume No.

1, and clarifications or minor changes

specifying the company’s current

practices which have developed since

the implementation of Order No. 636 in

November, 1993.

Texas Gas states that copies of the

filing have been served upon Texas

Gas’s jurisdictional customers and

interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Sections 385.211

and 385.214 of the Commission’s Rules

and Regulations. All such motions or

protests must be filed as provided in

Section 154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party to the proceeding must

file a motion to intervene. Copies of this

filing are on file with the Commission

and are available for public inspection

in the Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12903 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. PR96–7–000]

Transok, Inc.; Notice of Petition for

Rate Approval

May 17, 1996.

Take notice that on May 1, 1996,

Transok, Inc. (Transok), filed pursuant

to section 284.123(b)(2) of the

Commission’s regulations, a petition for

rate approval requesting that the

Commission approve as fair and

equitable rates for interruptible

transportation services performed under

section 311(a)(2) of the Natural Gas

Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) on Transok’s

Oklahoma Anadarko System.

Transok proposes a new system-wide

maximum rate for interruptible service

of $0.2541 per MMBtu delivered.

Transok will also charge each shipper

the shipper’s pro rate share of actual

compressor fuel plus 0.5 percent per

volumes delivered for system losses.

Transok proposes an effective date of

May 1, 1996.

Transok states that it is an intrastate

pipeline within the meaning of section

2(16) of the NGPA and it owns and

operates two intrastate pipeline systems

in the State of Oklahoma (the Anadarko

System and the Traditional System),

and one system in the State of

Louisiana. Transok here proposes rates

for the Anadarko System only.

Pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2)(ii),

if the Commission does not act within

150 days of the filing date, the rate will

be deemed to be fair and equitable and

not in excess of an amount which

interstate pipelines would be permitted

to charge for similar transportation

service. The Commission may, prior to

the expiration of the 150-day period,

extend the time for action or institute a

proceeding to afford parties an

opportunity for written comments and

for the oral presentation of views, data,

and arguments.

Any person desiring to participate in

this rate proceeding must file a motion

to intervene with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 in

accordance with sections 385.211 and

385.214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure. All motions

must be filed with the Secretary of the

Commission on or before June 3, 1996.

The petition for rate approval is on file

with the Commission and is available

for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12909 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. EL96–52–000, et al.]

Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia

v. Georgia Power Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

May 15, 1996.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Municipal Electric Authority of

Georgia v. Georgia Power Company

[Docket No. EL96–52–000]

Take notice that on May 10, 1996, the

Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia

(MEAG) filed a Complaint and Motion

for Expedited Relief against Georgia

Power Company (GPC) under Section

205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act.

MEAG is seeking early termination of

the obligations between MEAG and GPC

arising from GPC’s partial requirements

tariff and related agreements on the

grounds that said agreements are unjust

and unreasonable. MEAG is also seeking

refunds from GPC for violations of the

filed rate doctrine and for the improper

accounting practices utilized by GPC in

applying the formulary rate set forth in

the tariff.

Comment date: June 14, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Union Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–487–000]

Take notice that on May 6, 1996,

Union Electric Company tendered for

filing an Interchange Agreement dated

June 10, 1994, between the United

States of America, as represented by the

Administrator, Southwestern Power

Administration (SPA) and Union

Electric Company (UE). UE asserts that

the agreement provides for the exchange

of power and energy between the

parties.

Comment date: May 29, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. NORSTAR Energy Limited

Partnership

[Docket No. ER96–10–001]

Take notice that on May 9, 1996,

NORSTAR Energy Limited Partnership

tendered for filing its compliance filing

in the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 29, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.,

Rockland Electric Company and Pike

County Light & Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–1059–000]

Take notice that on May 9, 1996,

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., on