alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William B. BLEY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Jane E. BLEY, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 61518.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 16, 1993.

J. Andrew Walker, Town & Country, for petitioner, appellant.

David G. Waltrip, Jody H. Wolff, St. Louis, for respondent, respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from that portion of the dissolution decree awarding child sup*646port and the court’s award of attorneys fees. The decree is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no prece-dential value. The decree of the trial court and its award of attorney’s fees is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 411 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the Intermediate Space Challenge in 

Mojave, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2009 

Mr. MCCARTHY of California (for himself, Mr. MCKEON, and Mr. COSTA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the Intermediate Space 

Challenge in Mojave, California. 

Whereas the Intermediate Space Challenge in Mojave, California, is a program designed to capture the imagination 

of youths regarding outer space; 

Whereas the aspiration of the Intermediate Space Challenge 

is to introduce, instill, and energize youths’ interest in 

the engineering, mathematics, and science career fields; 

Whereas the Intermediate Space Challenge focuses on 4th, 

5th, and 6th grade students during their formative years; 

Whereas the Intermediate Space Challenge provides students 

the opportunity to visit the Mojave Air and Space Port, 

a 3,300 acre flight research center; 


jbell on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 411 IH 

Whereas aviation legends and private space pioneers such as 

Burt Rutan, Dick Rutan, Brian Binnie, and Mike Melvill 

have worked with and spoken to students participating in 

the program; 

Whereas the Intermediate Space Challenge enables students 

to work together in a team environment to choose a team 

name, create team banners, craft an essay, and develop 

and use their math and science skills to construct and 

launch a small rocket under appropriate supervision; and 

Whereas the program judges student rocket teams on banner 

designs, essays, and rocket construction and performance: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the Inter3 mediate Space Challenge; 

4 (2) commends the volunteers who run the Inter5 mediate Space Challenge and the Mojave Air and 

6 Space Port for opening its facility to the young lead7 ers of the future in the science and engineering 

8 fields; and 

9 (3) encourages teachers and school administra10 tors across the country to implement similar pro11 grams to stimulate students and infuse them with a 

12 love of engineering, mathematics, and science. 

Æ 


jbell on PRODPC61 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006 (the  "Report") of Parke Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company") as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  we, Vito S.  Pantilione,
President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Ernest D.  Huggard,  Senior  Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Bank.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                             <C>
/s/VITO S. PANTILIONE                                /s/ERNEST D. HUGGARD
-------------------------------------                -------------------------------------------------
Vito S. Pantilione                                   Ernest D. Huggard
President and Chief Executive Officer                Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
</TABLE>


May 15, 2006
ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AGREEMENT


     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED  Edwin  Lao  ("Assignor"),  for  good  and  valuable
consideration,  does  hereby sell, assign, and transfer to Corporate Development
and  Innovation  Inc., a Washington Corporation ("Assignee"), all of the rights,
title  and  interest  of Assignor and delegates to Assignee all of the duties of
Assignor  under  that  certain  License  Agreement  dated August 17, 2000 by and
between  Assignor  and  Vitamineralherb.com  Corp., a Nevada Corporation, a true
copy  of  which  is  annexed  hereto  and  made  a  part  hereof.

     Assignor  represents  that  the  annexed  contract  is  a valid and binding
agreement in all respects, is assignable and the duties hereunder delegable, and
that  this  assignment  and  delegation  is  a  valid exercise of the Assignor's
rights.

     Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of Assignor's obligations
under  the annexed contract.  Assignee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless
Assignor,  from  and against any claim, liability and expense which Assignee may
incur (including without limitation attorneys fees and litigation expenses) that
arises  out  of Assignee's performance of, or failure to perform, such contract.


Dated this 17th day of August, 2000.


ASSIGNOR:                              ASSIGNEE:

                                       Corporate Development and Innovation Inc.

/x/                                    /x/
--------------------------             --------------------------
Edwin  Lao                             Edwin  Lao,  President




                                                                       1 of 1
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 378 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 378

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 12, 2009.
Whereas May 4, 2009, marks the 30th anniversary of the first woman sworn in as 
        the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Margaret Hilda Thatcher;
Whereas Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1979 to 
        1990 and at the time of her resignation, was the longest continuously 
        serving Prime Minster since 1827;
Whereas Prime Minister Thatcher was Leader of the Conservative Party from 1975 
        to 1990 and the only woman to ever hold that post;
Whereas Margaret Thatcher is the only woman to have ever held the post of Prime 
        Minister of the United Kingdom;
Whereas Margaret Thatcher is the only Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in 
        the 20th century to win three consecutive terms;
Whereas Margaret Thatcher gave birth to a new distinctive ideology known as 
        ``Thatcherism'' which emphasized individual responsibility in the United 
        Kingdom's monetary and social policies;
Whereas Time Magazine named Margaret Thatcher one of the 20 most influential 
        leaders of the 20th century;
Whereas the strong, cooperative stances held by Prime Minister Thatcher, 
        President Ronald Reagan, and Pope John Paul II are widely acknowledged 
        to have been key forces in the collapse of communism in the former 
        Soviet Union;
Whereas the special relationship between the United States and the United 
        Kingdom was greatly strengthened under the tenure of Prime Minister 
        Thatcher;
Whereas, on January 19, 1976, Prime Minister Thatcher delivered a bold speech 
        against the communist regime of the Soviet Union, which prompted the 
        Soviet Union Army's newspaper, the Red Star, to coin her the ``Iron 
        Lady'';
Whereas in 1990, Margaret Thatcher was honored by Queen Elizabeth II with the 
        Order of Merit, one of the United Kingdom's highest distinctions; and
Whereas in 1992, Queen Elizabeth II bestowed a life peerage upon Margaret 
        Thatcher, conferring upon her the title of Baroness and providing a 
        lifetime seat in the House of Lords: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) acknowledges the 30th anniversary of the election of Margaret 
        Thatcher as the first female Prime Minister of the United Kingdom;
            (2) pays tribute to the remarkable professional achievements of 
        Margaret Thatcher;
            (3) recognizes Prime Minister Thatcher's dedicated work in promoting 
        individual rights and free markets around the world; and
            (4) appreciates the strong diplomatic relationship between the 
        United States and the United Kingdom fostered by Prime Minister 
        Thatcher.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deerfield Triarc Capital
Corp. (the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                    |                   
|--------------------------------------------------- | ------------------
|/s/ JONATHAN W. TRUTTER                             | Date: May 15, 2006
|                                                    |                   
|Jonathan W. Trutter                                 |                   
|Chief Executive Officer                             |                   
|(Principal Executive
  Officer)                     |                   
|                                                    |                   
|/s/ RICHARD G. SMITH                                | Date: May 15, 2006
|                                                    |                   
|Richard G. Smith                                    |                   
|Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer |                   
|(Principal Financial
  Officer)                     |                   

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting that signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Deerfield Triarc
Capital Corp. and will be retained by Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

---
Opinion issued February 26, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 14 - 01017 - CR

——————————— MICHAEL HOSEA , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 9415203 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Michael Hosea, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion requesting free cop ies of various documents and transcripts related to his felony conviction. We dismiss the appeal.2

Hosea was convicted of murder in 1995. This Court previously affirmed the judgment of the trial court and dismissed two subsequent attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment. See Hosea v. State , No. 01 - 12 - 00918 - CR, 2012 WL 5878117 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Hosea v. State , No. 01 - 11 - 01050 - CR, 2012 WL 2345351 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] June 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Hosea v. State , No. 01 - 95 - 00358 - CR, 1997 WL 709453 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 6, 1997, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). On November 5, 2014, Hosea filed a “Motion to Obtain Tr i al Transcripts and Statement of Facts Informa [sic] Pauperis” in the trial court , seeking free copies of records from his criminal conviction for use in preparing an o ut - of - time appeal or an application for a post - conviction writ of habeas corpus . The trial court denied the motion on November 12, 2014. Hosea filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order on December 8, 2014. “The denial of a motion to obtain a free record is not an appealable order.” Poole v. State , No. 14 - 14 - 00081 - CR, 2014 WL 1268617, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 27, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing Manning v. State , No. 14 - 11 - 00464 - CR, 2011 WL 2434064, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] June 16, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not3

designated for publication)); see Quijano v. State , No. 14 - 11 - 01105 - CR, 2012 WL 214293, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 24, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not desig nated for publication). Accordingly, we dismiss Hosea’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
**Exhibit
3.3**





**CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT TO THE**


**ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION**


**OF
LIMELIGHT MEDIA GROUP, INC.**








The
undersigned officer of Limelight Media Group, Inc. does hereby certify
that:





1. The name
of the corporation for which this Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation is being filed is Limelight Media Group, Inc. (the
“Corporation”).





2. The
original Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as subsequently amended,
were filed on May 17, 1996 (the "Articles of Incorporation").





3. The
Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended as
follows:





A.T he total
number of shares of Common Stock which the Corporation shall have authority to
issue is 100,000,000 shares.





4. This
Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation has been approved by
the Board of Directors of the Corporation and by more than a majority of the
outstanding stockholders of the Corporation. The number of shares entitled to
vote on this Certificate of Amendment was 42,694,113 and the number of shares
that voted in favor of this Certificate of Amendment was 22,628,000.








IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Corporation has hereunto set his
hands this 29 th day of
February 2004.




_/s/
David V. Lott_______


Name:  David V.
Lott


Title:Chief Executive
Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph WASHINGTON, Defendant/Appellant. Joseph WASHINGTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65032.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 18, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 14, 1995.

John Klosterman, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*609Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Washington (appellant) appeals his sentence as a prior and persistent offender to two consecutive life sentences and a concurrent term of fifteen years following the jury’s verdict adjudging him guilty of two counts of first degree robbery and one count of felonious restraint and the motion court’s denial of his motion for post conviction relief.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the basis for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03- 10 -00 194 -CV

In r e D’ And r e Lusha wn Hans for d

ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M LEE COUNTY M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator filed his pe tition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court ha d not signe d an orde r of dismissal as ag ree d in relator’ s plea ba rg ain or transmitted the dismissal to t he Texas Depar

tment of Criminal J u s t i ce (“ T DC J ”). See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8. We have r ece ived notification that the dismissal order wa s signe d in September 2 0 0 8 , at the time the cour t entere d judg me n t p u r s u an t to th e p le a a g r e e me n t, an d th a t it w a s d e li v e r e d to T D CJ o n A p r il 1 3 , 2010. B e c a us e the re lie f s ou g ht b y

re la tor ha s b e e n g ra

nte d, we dis mis s the pe tit ion fo r w ri t of

mand a mus .

______________

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Filed: May

20, 2010
exv10w8



 





Exhibit 10.8




AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO YEON BUSINESS CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT

(3200 NW Yeon)




	 	 	 	 	 
	DATED:

	 	March 10, 2006	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	BETWEEN:

	 	SCHNITZER INVESTMENT CORP., 

an Oregon corporation
	 	(“Landlord”)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	AND:

	 	SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.,


an Oregon corporation
	 	(“Tenant”)






          Landlord and Tenant are parties to a Yeon Business Center (3200 NW Yeon) Lease Agreement dated
August 7, 2003 (the “Lease Agreement”), as amended by an Amendment No. 1 to Lease dated
February 1, 2004 (the “First Amendment”) and an Amendment No. 2 to Yeon Business Center
Lease Agreement dated October 20, 2005 (the “Second Amendment”). The Lease Agreement, the
First Amendment, and the Second Amendment are collectively referred to as the “Lease” in this
Amendment No. 3 to Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement (the “Amendment”). The parties
desire to correct an error in the Base Rent schedule set forth in the Second Amendment.




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties set forth in this
Amendment, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:




     1. Correction of Base Rent. Base Rent for January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2007,
is $43,285.52 per month.



     2. Effect of Amendment. Landlord and Tenant ratify and confirm all provisions of the
Lease. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Lease remains unmodified and in full
force and effect.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first
set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LANDLORD:	 	SCHNITZER INVESTMENT CORP., an Oregon

corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Its:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TENANT:	 	SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC., an

Oregon corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Its:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

SOHU.COM INC. 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carol Yu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 19, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 127733 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 127733 COA: 247186 MTT: 00-294990 TOWNSHIP OF BRUCE, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of App eals is considered and, it app earing to this Court that the case of Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, City of Sterling Heights, and Township of Bruce (Docket Nos. 127422, 12 7423, 127424) is pendi ng on appeal before this Court and that the decisi on in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to app eal, we ORDER that the appli cation be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l1012 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 19, 2005

Clerk