alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITY OF KANSAS CITY, Respondent, v. Douglas SHANK, Appellant.

No. WD 50560.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 4, 1996.

C. John Forge, Jr., Independence, for appellant.

James Lindquist, Asst. City Pros., Kansas City, for respondent.

SPINDEN, Judge.

In January 1994, Kansas City’s animal control officer issued two complaints accusing Douglas Shank of two city ordinance violations: keeping dangerous animals and not disposing of accumulated manure. Shank requested a trial *de novo*in circuit court. After a hearing, the circuit court upheld the charged violations. Shank appeals.

The issues presented on appeal pertain only to the dangerous animals’ case. Kansas City asks us to dismiss the appeal because Shank did not heed Rule 81.12. We agree and grant the city’s request.

Although Shank’s brief challenges the circuit court’s decision concerning the dangerous animals charge, the document in his legal file pertaining to the manure violation was a motion to dismiss. This was not an appropriate record Tor review. Rule 81.12(a) says, “The legal file *shall always*include ... the pleadings. iipon which the action was tried, the verdict, the findings of the court or jury, the judgment or order appealed from, [and] motions and orders after judgment ... except the parties may agree in writing upon an abbreviated or partial record on appeal!.]” 1 Shank’s record included none of these documents. The parties did not agree to an abbreviated or partial record.

Rule 81.12(c) places the duty on Shank to provide an adequate legal file. Notwithstanding the city’s motion, Shank made no move to correct the problem. His counsel appeared at oral argument apparently unaware of the problem. Hence, we dismiss the appeal.

LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA, J., concur.

1

. We added the emphasis.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 22048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11839]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP92-166-013]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Technical 
Conference

May 7, 1996.
    Take notice that a technical conference will be convened in this 
proceeding on May 16, 1996, at 2:00 p.m., at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC, 
for the purpose of reviewing information submitted by Panhandle 
pursuant to the Commission's remand order in the above-referenced 
docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant, as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information please contact Carmen Gastilo (202) 208-
2182 or Kathleen Dias (202) 208-0524.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11839 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Vinita Bhatt, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

State of Arizona, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-17-04807-PHX-JZB 

ORDER 

 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 

45), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

 1. The Stipulation (Doc. 45) is granted. 

 2. That this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees 

and costs. 

 Dated this 19th day of November, 2018. 

 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:17-cv-04807-JZB Document 46 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13325]




[[Page 26905]]

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

All-Ways Forwarding Int'l Inc., Hemisphere Center, U.S. Rt. 1-9 South, 
Newark, NJ 07114, Officers: Solomon Weber, President, Paul Jeka, Vice 
President
H.Y.H. International Cargo Services, Inc., 1620 NW 82nd Avenue, Miami, 
FL 33126, Officer: Hans G. Hofmann, President
Mundial Forwarding, 918 Dunwoody Drive, Houston, TX 77076, Timoteo Muro 
Martinez, Sole Proprietor

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Ronald D. Murphy,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13325 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-112853, 333-116418, 333-128656 and 333-147210) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-11497, 333-114281, 333-128655 and 333-128189) of DDi Corp. of our report dated February 29, 2008 relating to
the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Orange County, California     
|February 29, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0581

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CATHERINE MARIE RYMAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 29, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 22 2022

06/22/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0581
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy O
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

     Dated:       November 30, 2006

             /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
           Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry

          Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# **Exhibit 31.1**

#### **CERTIFICATION**

I, David T. Gulian, certifythat:

1.                  I havereviewed this report on Form 10-Q of InfoLogix, Inc.; 

 

2.                  Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.                  Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.                 Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b.                Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

c.                 Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.                 Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b.                Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 15, 2007

 
| /s/ David T. Gulian                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| David T. Gulian                        |   |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

----
Exhibit 10.23

ULTICOM LETTERHEAD

 

 

**CONFIDENTIAL AND PERSONAL**

|   | August 6, 2008 |
|--------|----------------|

 

Osman Duman

90 Troy Drive

Short Hills, NJ 07078

 

Dear Osman:

 

This letter provides you with important, confidential information regarding your vested stock options in connection with your termination of employment with Ulticom, Inc. 

 

In accordance with your stock option agreement and the governing option plan(s), you have ninety (90) days from the last date of your employment with the Company to exercise all of your stock options that have vested as of such date. As stock option exercises are currently prohibited, we want to ensure that you have at least 30 days to exercise your vested stock options after stock            option exercises can resume. Consequently, if there are less than 30 days left in your 90-day exercise period or if the 90-day period has expired when the Company provides written notice to you that option exercises can resume (this notice is called the “Option Notice”), you will have 30 days from the date of the Option Notice to exercise your vested stock options. Please note that, in any event, any extension of your stock option exercise period may not extend beyond 10            years from the original date of grant of your stock options. 

 

We are pleased to provide this accommodation; however, you, in turn, must help us by providing us with timely contact information so that we can provide the Option Notice.

 

By countersigning this letter, you acknowledge and agree that the address that you provide below (this address is called the “Notice Address”) is the address to which the Company shall deliver the Option Notice, and that the Notice Address will only be changed upon your written notice to my attention at the Company by first class prepaid mail or overnight courier of any            change in such notice address. ***The Company will send only one Option Notice to you at your then current Notice Address, so it is critical that you keep us apprised of your latest preferred Notice Address.***

 

|   | Notice Address:  90 Troy Drive |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

|   | Short Hills, NJ 07078 |
|--------|-----------------------|

 

 

Please address any questions regarding this letter to me. Otherwise, please complete the Notice Address above and sign and date this letter below, then return it to me (after retaining a copy for yourself).

 

|   | Sincerely yours, |
|--------|------------------|

 

|   | Ulticom, Inc. |
|--------|---------------|

 

 

|   | By: | /s/ Marie Berdini |
|--------|-----|-------------------|

|   | Name: Marie Berdini |
|--------|---------------------|

|   | Title: | Director, Human Resources |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|

EMPLOYEE

 

/s/ Osman Duman

Name: Osman Duman

Date: August 19, 2008
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.2
------------


       NOTICE OF MODIFICATION TO THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AGREEMENT
       -------------------------------------------------------------------


Letterhead of Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Company


October 17, 2000


Mr. John L. Sams, President
Environmental Elements Corporation
P.O. Box 1318
3700 Koppers Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21203

Dear John:

Reference is made to the Revolving Credit and Letter of Credit Agreement dated
November 24, 1993 by and among Environmental Elements Corporation and
Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company as amended, most particularly the
Fifth Amendment dated May 18,2000. As of September 30, 2000, the financial
covenant specified in Paragraph 2C is hereby amended as follows:

     Borrower agrees it shall constitute a default under the Agreement if the
Borrower experiences an aggregate loss for the period October 1, 2000 through
March 30, 2001.

To signify acceptance of this revision, please sign where indicated below and
return a copy of this letter to me. This provision will be included in a Sixth
Amendment to the loan documentation to be prepared by the Bank's attorney.

Very truly yours,

Philip G. Enstice

Agreed and accepted this 17/th/ day of November, 2000.
                         ------


By: /s/
    ------------------------
   John L. Sams
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SummerInfant, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30,2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof, I Joseph Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Joseph  Driscoll     |   |                 |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------|
| Joseph Driscoll          |   | August 11, 2009 |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |                 |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5524 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 245
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5524

                          [Report No. 118-304]

 To amend the start date of the pilot program on sharing with foreign 
                 branches, subsidiaries and affiliates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2023

 Ms. Garcia of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Financial Services

                           December 11, 2023

                    Additional sponsor: Mr. Sherman

                           December 11, 2023

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
    [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on 
                          September 18, 2023]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the start date of the pilot program on sharing with foreign 
                 branches, subsidiaries and affiliates.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreign Affiliates Sharing Pilot 
Program Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. FOREIGN AFFILIATES SHARING PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 5318(g)(8)(B)(iii) of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``3 years after the date of enactment of this 
paragraph'' and inserting ``3 years after the date on which the 
Secretary of the Treasury issues rules pursuant to subparagraph (A)''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 245

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 5524

                          [Report No. 118-304]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the start date of the pilot program on sharing with foreign 
                 branches, subsidiaries and affiliates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 11, 2023

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20524-20525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11323]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1110-DR]


Illinois; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 20525]]

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1110-DR), dated April 23, 
1996, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 23, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated April 23, 1996, the President declared a major disaster under the 
authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of Illinois, resulting from severe storms and tornadoes on April 18-
19, 1996, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major 
disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 
and Emergency Assistance Act (``the Stafford Act''). I, therefore, 
declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of Illinois.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby 
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes, such 
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and 
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance, Public 
Assistance and Hazard Mitigation in the designated areas. Consistent 
with the requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any 
Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance 
or Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total 
eligible costs.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public 
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed 
six months after the date of this declaration.
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive 
Order 12148, I hereby appoint Ron Sherman of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this 
declared disaster.
    I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of Illinois 
to have been affected adversely by this declared major disaster:

    Champaign and Macon Counties for Individual Assistance, Public 
Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 96-11323 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. Mike and Carol THURMAN, Respondent.

No. WD 47898.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 22, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 1994.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rodney P. Massman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for appellant.

Mike and Carol Thurman, pro se.

Before BERREY, C.J., P.J., and KENNEDY and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission denying Director’s attempt to change the registration/classification of respondents’ vehicle from recreational vehicle to commercial vehicle.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).