alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11692]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-223-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

May 6, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1996, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A 
attached to the filing, proposed to be effective June 1, 1996.
    Panhandle asserts that the purpose of this filing is to reinstate 
the Take-or-Pay Volumetric Surcharge pursuant to Section 18.10(g) of 
the General Terms and Conditions of Panhandle's tariff.
    Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing is to establish a 
0.10 cents per Dt. Reconciliation Amount Recovery Period volumetric 
surcharge in accordance with the provisions of section 18.10(g) of 
Panhandle's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, to become 
effective June 1, 1996.
    Panhandle states that a copy of this filing is being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lindwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11692 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-86958, 333-64974, 333-60162, and 333-41362 ofI-many, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-68924, 333-76716, 333-85044, and 333-88714 of the Company on Form S-3 of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures andreclassifications of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 and 2000 financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than withrespect to such disclosures and reclassifications) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 31, 2003
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 325 

Expressing support for designation of a ‘‘Free Enterprise Education Week’’ 

to encourage elementary and secondary schools, institutions of higher 

education, and small and large businesses to educate students about 

free enterprise. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of a ‘‘Free Enterprise 

Education Week’’ to encourage elementary and secondary 

schools, institutions of higher education, and small and 

large businesses to educate students about free enterprise. 

Whereas the United States values the free enterprise system 

as the basic economic system in the Nation and our Nation should set a goal that all students in kindergarten 

through grade 12 and those students enrolled in postsecondary education have an understanding of the importance of the Nation’s free enterprise system, economics, 

and personal finance; 

Whereas a student’s understanding of the Nation’s free market system is an important part of the Nation’s long-term 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 325 IH 

economic growth and will enable that student to become 

a more productive and informed citizen; 

Whereas United States companies, student organizations, and 

teachers are willing and able to participate in educating 

young people about free enterprise and many organizations have developed programs to teach and encourage 

entrepreneurship among students; 

Whereas in 2001, Congress created the Excellence in Economic Education program, which aims to promote economic and financial literacy among all elementary and 

secondary students by improving the quality of student 

understanding of economics and personal finance through 

effective teaching of economics in the Nation’s classrooms; and 

Whereas through the Excellence in Economic Education program, the Federal Government works to increase students’ knowledge of and achievement in economics, 

strengthen teachers’ understanding of economics, encourage economic education research and development, disseminate effective instructional materials, and leverage 

and expand increased private and public support for economic education partnerships at the national, State, and 

local levels: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘Free Enter3 prise Education Week’’ to encourage elementary and 

4 secondary schools, institutions of higher education, 

5 and small and large businesses in the United States 

6 to educate students about the free enterprise system, 

7 and 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 325 IH 

1 (2) requests that the President issue a procla2 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

3 and interested organizations to observe such a week 

4 with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6096

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCFH I FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of UCFH I Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2009



> By:
> 
>                                                                                         
> 
>                                                                                         /s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. StockwellPrincipal Financial Officer
#### Fred W. Kellerman, Inc., Judgment Creditor, *v.*Dale Park Homes, Inc., et al., Judgment Debtors. Fred W. Kellerman, Inc., Judgment Creditor, *v.*Rosedale Land Corp., Judgment Debtor.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

August *15,*1956.

*Max N. Osen*for judgment creditor.

*Dreyer & Traub*for Home Title Guaranty Company.

*Harry Nassberg*for Ninth Federal Savings & Loan Association.

Samuel Rabin, J.

Application by a judgment creditor authorizing it to maintain actions against three financial institutions, allegedly indebted to the judgment debtors. One of such financial institutions, the Union Square Savings Bank, has not interposed any opposition to the application. The court has been informed by the attorney for the movant that the said bank has agreed to deliver the moneys held by it to the Sheriff. *969and has requested that the motion with respect to this respondent he withdrawn. That application is granted.

The remaining institutions have interposed affidavits in opposition both on the ground that the movant has failed to show any likelihood of success in the proposed litigation, and that the moving papers have not been served upon all necessary parties.

This motion is made pursuant to the provisions of section 687-a of the Civil Practice Act, which was enacted upon the recommendation of the Law Revision Commission of the State of New York (L.1952, ch. 835, eff. Sept. 1, 1952; 1952 Report of N. Y. Law Rev. Comm., p. 357 *et seq.).*

While the parties who have not been given notice of this application may be indispensable in the litigation itself, pursuant to the provisions of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act, the court finds nothing in the statute which requires that notice of the application by the judgment creditor for leave to institute the litigation as a preliminary thereto must be given to them.

The court is of the opinion that in view of the purpose of the new remedy as outlined in' the recommendations of the Law Revision Commission, the judgment creditor has made out a prima facie case which warrants the application of the new procedure, and the motion is, accordingly, granted, not alone with respect to the two unsatisfied judgments embraced in the original application, but the third judgment described in the reply affidavit of the judgment creditor’s attorney sworn to August 6, 1956.

Submit order on notice.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 98-20090

_____________________________________

AMERICAN NURSES FOR NURSES, INC., doing business as

Medical Services,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.; ET AL.,

VERSUS

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.;

AI MANAGEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLAIM ADJUSTERS,

A DIVISION OF AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL AJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC;

SMITH BELL & THOMPSON, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-4392)

______________________________________________________

December 8, 1998

Before DAVIS, SMITH AND WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Based on our review of the record, the briefs and oral

argument, and for essentially the reasons stated by the district

court, we affirm the court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.
2
#### In the Interest of K.S.C. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. K.S.C., Appellant.

WD 48080.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 15, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 1994.

Mark R. Thompson, Laurilyn A. Goettsch, Kansas City, for appellant.

Catherine S. Dorothy, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, C.J., and KENNEDY and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a juvenile court order finding K.S.C. to be in need of care and treatment for committing an act which would be a crime if she were an adult.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
H. Res. 420 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 8, 2009. 

Whereas Flag Day is celebrated annually on June 14, the anniversary of the official adoption of the American flag by 

the Continental Congress in 1777; 

Whereas on June 14, 1777, in order to establish an official 

flag for the new Nation, the Continental Congress passed 

the first Flag Act, which stated, ‘‘Resolved, That the flag 

of the United States be made of thirteen stripes, alternate red and white; that the union be thirteen stars, 

white in a blue field, representing a new Constellation’’; 

Whereas the second Flag Act, signed January 13, 1794, provided for 15 stripes and 15 stars after May 1795; 

Whereas the Act of April 4, 1818, which provided for 13 

stripes and one star for each State, to be added to the 

flag on July 4 following the admission of each new State, 

was signed by President James Monroe; 

Whereas in an Executive order dated June 24, 1912, President William Howard Taft established the proportions of 

the flag and provided for arrangement of the stars in 6 

horizontal rows of 8 each, a single point of each star to 

be upward; 

Whereas in an Executive order dated January 3, 1959, President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided for the arrange-
2 

•HRES 420 EH 

ment of the stars in 9 rows staggered horizontally and 

11 rows of stars staggered vertically; 

Whereas the first celebration of the American flag is believed 

to have been introduced by Bernard Cigrand, a Wisconsin school teacher, who arranged for his pupils at 

Stony Hill School in Waubeka to celebrate June 14 as 

‘‘Flag Birthday’’ in 1885; 

Whereas on June 14, 1894, the Governor of New York ordered that the American flag be displayed at all public 

buildings in the State, prompting many State and local 

governments to begin observing Flag Day; 

Whereas President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed the first nationwide Flag Day in 1916; 

Whereas in 1947, President Harry S. Truman signed legislation requesting National Flag Day be observed annually; 

Whereas the United States flag is a symbol of our great Nation and its ideals; 

Whereas in times of national crisis, Americans look to the 

United States flag as a symbol of hope, courage, and 

freedom; 

Whereas the United States flag is universally honored; 

Whereas the United States flag honors the men and women 

of the Armed Forces who have given their life in the defense of the United States; 

Whereas the United States flag serves as a treasured symbol 

of the loss of loved ones to the countless families of those 

who died in defense of our Nation; and 

Whereas June 14, 2009, is recognized as Flag Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 420 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives celebrates 

the United States flag and supports the goals and ideals of 

Flag Day. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dr. Eugene Stricker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kushi Natural Foods Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annually report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

            Date:  April 6, 2005

            /s/ DR. EUGENE STRICKER
            -------------------------------------
            Dr. Eugene Stricker
            President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0502 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROGER MICHAEL KEECH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 13, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 5 2024

02/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0502
EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, I, Peter Mak, the Chief Financial
Officer of Teda Travel Incorporated, a Florida corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:    April 15, 2003                     /s/  Peter Mak
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Name:    Peter Mak
                                            Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nuance
Communications, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles W. Berger, Chief Executive
Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



March 15, 2005



By:

/S/    CHARLES W.
BERGERCharles W. Berger President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Spark Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Adam S. Berger     
|Adam S. Berger         
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 12, 2010        
|                       
|/s/ Brett A. Zane      
|Brett A. Zane          
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 12, 2010