alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Osborn, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Hudson's Grill International, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the periods presented in this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date:	April 4, 2005 | /s/David L. Osborn

[Signature]

President
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------

f\sec\o01.050331
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 26, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 26, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A0678. RABEN THORNTON v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2010 |  | /s/ Mark A. Sirgo                                   
|                     |  | Mark A. Sirgo, President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 471 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 471

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 3, 2009.
Whereas on Monday, May 11, 2009, the Nation experienced a tragedy when a soldier 
        at the combat stress clinic at Camp Liberty, Iraq, reportedly killed 
        five innocent American servicemen, and wounded three others;
Whereas the shooting resulted in the tragic loss of Navy Commander Charles K. 
        Springle, Army Major Matthew P. Houseal, Army Sergeant Christian E. 
        Bueno-Galdos, Army Specialist Jacob D. Barton, and Army Specialist 
        Michael E. Yates;
Whereas the lives of the victims were taken while they were bravely and 
        honorably serving the United States on the front lines in Iraq;
Whereas the combat stress clinic at Camp Liberty, Iraq, and similar clinics in 
        theater and at home provide essential mental health services to the 
        Nation's servicemen and women;
Whereas the Nation's protracted military engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan 
        call for increased attention to the mental health challenges faced by 
        the courageous members of the Armed Forces; and
Whereas honoring the Nation's commitment to those who serve the Nation and their 
        families means offering these heroic soldiers not only first class 
        medical care for physical injuries, but also first class mental health 
        services: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its heartfelt condolences to the families and friends 
        of the victims of the May 11, 2009, shooting at the combat stress clinic 
        at Camp Liberty, Iraq;
            (2) conveys its ongoing deep gratitude to the brave members of the 
        Armed Forces who risk their lives in service of protecting the Nation;
            (3) recognizes the important work of the medical professionals and 
        staff members, who provide essential mental health services to our 
        servicemen and women, at Combat Stress Control Center in Camp Liberty, 
        Iraq, and other clinics in theater and at home; and
            (4) commits to focus on the mental, in addition to the physical, 
        well being of the Nation's military servicemen and women, and veterans, 
        and to support the policies, resources, and funding necessary to 
        successfully combat the mental and physical healthcare challenges that 
        they may confront.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of TransAsia Lawyers, PRC Counsel**

 

March 25, 2005 

 

Sohu.com Inc. 

Level 12, Vision International Center 

No. 1 Unit Zhongguancun East Road, Haidian District 

Beijing 100084

People’s Republic of China 

 

Dear Sirs, 

 

Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2004 

 

We hereby consent to the references to our firm under the heading “Government Regulation and Legal Uncertainties” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

Very truly yours,
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12700]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. No. 5794]


Atlas Supply Company; Prohibited Trade Practices and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Set aside order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order reopens a 1951 consent order--which prohibited 
Atlas from receiving illegal allowances or knowingly accepting or 
inducing discriminatory prices in their purchase of automotive tires, 
tubes, batteries, accessories or other automobile products--and sets 
aside the consent order pursuant to the Commission's Sunset Policy 
Statement, under which the Commission presumes that the public interest 
requires terminating competition orders that are more than 20 years 
old.

DATES: Consent order issued July 19, 1951. Set aside order issued 
August 24, 1995.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Consent Order and Set Aside Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Ducore, FTC/S-2115, Washington, D.C. 20580, (202) 326-2526.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Matter of Atlas Supply Company. The 
prohibited trade practices and/or corrective actions are removed as 
indicated.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; Sec. 2, 49 Stat. 1526; 15 U.S.C. 45, 13)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12700 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofCalif Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
NO. 07-11-0482-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JANUARY 5, 2012

THE STATE OF TEXAS,  

	Appellant 

v.

DEBRA MASSINGHAM,  

	Appellee

_____________________________

FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF LIPSCOMB COUNTY;

NO. 1217; HONORABLE STEVEN RAY EMMERT, PRESIDING

***Dismissal***

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

1

******Pending before us is an appeal by Preferred Beef Group from an order denying its motion to quash a subpoena served on its custodian of records.  The subpoena was served upon Beef by Debra Massingham as part of a criminal proceeding initiated by the State against Massingham.  The trial court purportedly denied Beef’s motion to quash the directive.  We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.  

	By letter dated December 14, 2011, we directed Beef to inform this court why we have jurisdiction over the appeal.  In response to our letter, Beef did not deny that the order from which it sought to appeal is interlocutory.  Nor did it explain why our very limited authority to entertain interlocutory appeals encompassed the circumstances before us.  Rather, we were told that 1) the matter could be reviewed via a petition for writ of mandamus, 2) we previously held, in *Martin v. Darnell*, 960 S.W.2d 838 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1997, no writ), that the “proper method of redress for a denial of a motion to quash a subpoena [served] on a non-party in a criminal matter” was through applying for mandamus relief, and 3) Beef intended to file a petition for writ of mandamus.  Yet, we have no petition for mandamus before us, and an appeal is not such a proceeding.  

	   Interlocutory appeals are extraordinary measures and rarely permitted.  *Gutierrez v. State,*307 S.W.3d 318, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).  And, unless it is specifically authorized by statute, we lack jurisdiction over them.  *Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.,*39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (stating that our jurisdiction over appeals extends only to those arising from a final judgment or those provided for by statute).  Since we know of no statute that allows us to review, *via an appeal*, the trial court’s interlocutory decision to deny the motion to quash, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and dismiss it.[footnoteRef:1]     [1: Preferred Beef Group’s motion for an extension of time to file a writ of mandamus is denied as moot since there is no time deadline by which one must request such relief.  ] 

							Brian Quinn 

							Chief Justice

Do not publish.

2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Mikel Anderson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Trans Union, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV17-4460 PHX DGC 

ORDER 

 

 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation of dismissal with prejudice re 

Defendant Valley Collection Services, LLC, only. Doc. 55. 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation of dismissal with prejudice 

(Doc. 55) is granted. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 Dated this 22nd day of March, 2018. 

Case 2:17-cv-04460-DGC Document 56 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00317

- CV

Teresa M. FAYETTE

, Appellant

v.

Luciano REYES and ABC Trucking,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI04948

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellees Luciano Reyes and ABC Trucking recover their costs

on appeal from Appellant Teresa M. Fayette.

SIGNED August 21, 2019.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David T. Gulian, the ChiefExecutive Officer of InfoLogix, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three monthsended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:  August 16, 2010

 

 
| /s/  David T. Gulian                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| David  T. Gulian                       |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Charles A. Carroll, President and Chief Executive Officer of Goodman Global, Inc. (the Registrant) and Lawrence M. Blackburn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the period covered by the
Periodic Report and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Charles A. CarrollCharles A. CarrollPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Lawrence M. BlackburnLawrence M. BlackburnExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer


Date: November 8, 2006
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David KALTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 59611.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 16, 1993.

Melinda K. Pendergraph, Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Hugh L. Marshall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, David Kalter, was convicted, after a jury trial, of forcible rape and two counts of forcible sodomy. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment of 45 years, 5 years and life imprisonment.

Defendant appealed to this court and the case was remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State used its peremptory challenges during jury selection to exclude blacks in contravention of *Batson v. Kentucky,*476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). In all other respects the convictions were affirmed. *State v. Kalter,*828 S.W.2d 690 (Mo.App.1992).

On remand, the trial court found the prosecutor’s articulated reasons for the challenged peremptory strikes to be legitimate, race-neutral, and nonpretextual and denied defendant relief. Defendant again appealed to this court.

We have reviewed the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12920]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-518-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

May 17, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 13, 1996, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. 
CP96-518-000 a request pursuant to Section 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
Commission's regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.211) for authorization to construct and operate certain facilities 
in the State of Arkansas. NGT makes such request, under its blanket 
certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-384-000 and CP82-348-001, 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Specifically, NGT is proposing to construct and operate a 1-inch 
tap and 1-inch first-cut regulator on NGT's Line J in Craighead County, 
Arkansas. NGT indicates that the proposed facilities will be 
constructed within NGT's existing right-of-way. NGT declares that the 
facilities will be used to deliver gas to ARKLA, which is a 
distribution division of NorAm Energy Corp. It is estimated that 
approximately 640 MMBtu annually will be delivered to this delivery 
tap, and approximately 8 MMBtu on a peak day. NGT implies that the 
volumes proposed to be delivered are within ARKLA's existing 
entitlements.
    NGT estimates the construction cost of this project to be $2,700, 
and states that ARKLA has agreed to reimburse NGT for those cost. NGT 
indicates that ARKLA will construct a 1\1/2\ inch U-Shape meter and 
convey it to NGT. It is further stated that NGT will own and operate 
the tap, first-cut regulator and meter.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12920 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32**

**Certificate pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of FirstBank Financial Services, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Randall Dixon, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and I, Lisa J. Maxwell, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       To my knowledge, the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|            |                                         |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|
|            | /s/ J. Randall Dixon                         |
|            | J. Randall Dixon President and C.E.O.        |
|            | (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|            |                                         |
|            |                                         |
|            | /s/ Lisa J. Maxwell                          |
|            | Lisa J. Maxwell, C.F.O.                      |
|            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|            |                                         |
| August 11, 2006 |                                         |

 

----