alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Charles Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Micro Bio-Medical Waste
Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 11, 2005

/s/ Charles Smith
------------------
Charles Smith, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 4 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 5 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 6 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 7 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 8 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 9 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 10 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 11 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 12 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 13 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 14 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 15 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 16 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 17 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 18 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 19 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 20 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 21 of 22
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-11 Filed 10/09/18 Page 22 of 22
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12340]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5506-2]


Committee Meetings of the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport 
Commission

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) 
is announcing a meeting of the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport 
Commission (Commission).
    The Commission will meet from 10:00 am-12:00 pm, Monday, June 10, 
1996 at the Shrine of the Ages next to the Main Visitors Center in 
Grand Canyon National Park. At the meeting the Commission will finalize 
its recommendations to the U.S. EPA. The recommendations will address 
what actions are deemed necessary to protect visibility in sixteen 
National Parks and Wilderness areas on the Colorado Plateau.
    The Commission was established by U.S. EPA on November 13, 1991 
(see 56 FR 57522, November 12, 1991). All meetings are open to the 
public. These meetings are not subject to the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Leary, Project Manager for 
the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission, Western Governors' 
Association, 600 17th Street, Suite 1705, South Tower, Denver, Colorado 
80202; telephone number (303) 623-9378; facsimile machine number (303) 
534-7309.

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Felicia Marcus,
Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.
[FR Doc. 96-12340 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital
Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
 1.
              The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.
 
 
 Date: May
14, 2010





/s/Michael A. Reisner


Michael
A. Reisner


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
Case 3:17-cr-08271-JJT   Document 1   Filed 10/31/17   Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12318]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Care Financing Administration
[HCFA-287]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposal for the collection of information. Interested persons are 
invited to send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, including any of the 
following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed 
information collection for the proper performance of the agency's 
functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology to minimize the information collection 
burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently 
approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Home Office Cost 
Statement; Form No.: HCFA 287; Use: Medicare law permits components of 
chain organizations to be reimbursed for certain costs incurred by the 
chain home offices. The Home Office Cost Statement is required by the 
fiscal intermediary to verify Home Office Costs claimed by the 
components. Frequency: Annually; Affected Public: Business or other 
for-profit, and Not-for-profit institutions; Number of Respondents: 
1,231; Total Annual Responses: 1,231; Total Annual Hours Requested: 
573,646.
    To request copies of the proposed paperwork collections referenced 
above, E-mail your request, including your address, to 
P<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1475647166637b667f547c7772753a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4021302532372f322b00282326216e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-
1326. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collections should be sent within 30 days of this notice directly to 
the OMB Desk Officer designated at the following address: OMB Human 
Resources and Housing Branch, Attention: Allison Eydt, New Executive 
Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Kathleen B. Larson,
Director, Management Planning and Analysis Staff, Office of Financial 
and Human Resources, Health Care Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-12318 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Paula JONES, Appellant, v. HAWKINSON VAN LINES, Respondent.

No. 64043.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Oct. 26, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 24, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 25, 1994.

Gary J. Sanguinet, St. Louis, for appellant.

Dean L. Christianson, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent Hawkinson Van Lines.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Maria W. Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Stephen M. Prosperi, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent Mo. State Treasurer, Custodian of Second Injury Fund.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

ORDER ■

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Paula M. Jones, appeals from a judgment rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, as well as the transcript and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
Case 2:17-mj-01850-JFM   Document 1   Filed 10/31/17   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:17-mj-01850-JFM   Document 1   Filed 10/31/17   Page 2 of 2
#### Dana Ray BROADNAX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 06-95-00043-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.

June 1, 1995.

Rehearing Overruled June 21, 1995.

Kathi Alyce Drew, Dallas, for appellant.

Sue Korioth, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, for appellee.

Before CORNELIUS, C.J., and BLEIL and GRANT, JJ.

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Dana Broadnax appeals from a conviction for unlawfid delivery of a controlled sub*453stance (cocaine). The jury assessed punishment at fifteen years’ confinement.1

The sentence was imposed in open court on August 26, 1994. A notice of appeal, which was due to be filed in the trial court within thirty days of that date, was not filed until December 6, 1994. Because the notice of appeal was filed several months after it was due, it was untimely under Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(1).

On February 3, 1995, Broadnax filed a motion in the Fifth Court of Appeals to extend the time to file his notice of appeal in this cause. On April 18, 1995, that court granted the motion.

Rule 41(b)(2) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal may be granted by a court of appeals if the notice was filed within fifteen days after the last day allowed and within the same fifteen-day period a motion was filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. *See also Olivo v. State,*894 S.W.2d 58 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1995, no pet.). Compliance with these provisions is jurisdictional. *Id.,*citing *Charles v. State,*809 S.W.2d 574, 576 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1991, no pet.). Neither of these requirements was met in this case.

A timely and properly filed notice of appeal is necessary to perfect an appeal in a criminal case. TexRApp.P. 41(b)(1). The Fifth Court of Appeals was without jurisdiction on April 18, 1995 to grant an extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal which was due on September 26, 1994. Appellate rules may not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the courts of appeals as established by law, and Rules 2(b) and 83 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure do not authorize a court of appeals to suspend the requirements of Rules 41(b)(1) and 41(b)(2) so as to bestow appellate jurisdiction when jurisdiction does not otherwise exist. *See*Tex.R.App.P. 2(a); *see also Jones v. State,*796 S.W.2d 183, 187 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (Tex.R.App.P. 83 does not give a court of appeals power to permit an appellant to amend his notice of appeal out of time).

We hold that we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. *See Rodarte v. State,*860 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex.Crim.App.1993).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

1

. This case was transferred to this Court on May 8, 1995, by the Supreme Court of Texas under the docket equalization program.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.30


                   TRADEMARK LICENSE EXTENSION AGREEMENT (UK)


              This Extension Agreement dated as of November 30, 2002 is by and
between Hallmark Cards, Incorporated ("Hallmark") and Crown Entertainment
Limited ("Crown Entertainment").


         WHEREAS, Crown Entertainment and Hallmark have previously entered into
that certain Amended and Restated Trademark License Agreement between the
parties dated as of December 1, 2000 (the "License Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the term of the License
Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, Crown Entertainment and Hallmark hereby agree as
follows:

         1. The term of the License Agreement shall be extended for an
additional year period terminating on November 30, 2003, subject to any earlier
termination pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.

         2. Paragraph 1 Grant shall be amended by adding at the end of the
introductory paragraph "and Crown Entertainment shall be a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Crown Media Holdings, Inc.:"

         3. All other terms and conditions of the License Agreement will remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Extension Agreement as of the date set forth above.



HALLMARK CARDS, INCORPORATED


By:      /s/ Judith Whittaker
   ---------------------------------

Title:   Executive Vice President
      ------------------------------


CROWN ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED

By:               /s/ C. Stanford
   ---------------------------------

Title:            Director
      ------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

s1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145324 & (26)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145324

COA: 309241

Muskegon CC: 04

- 050742

- FH

CHAUNCEY EVERETT PHILLIPS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s

December 19, 2011 motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G) and

because the defendant’s October 19, 2011 motion for relief from judgment has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to

remand is DENIED.
Exhibit 13


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street NE


Washington, DC 20549








Ladies and Gentlemen:




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.


Ms. Chanda Kochhar, the Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Rakesh Jha, Chief Financial Officer of ICICI Bank Limited, each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:


1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and


2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ICICI Bank Limited.





Date: July 25, 2014








Chanda Kochhar

Managing Director & Chief Executive OfficerRakesh JhaChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATE OF CEO**
     I, Steven M. Skow, Chief Executive Officer of Integrity Bancshares, Inc. (the “Registrant”),do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
 (1)  the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this certificateis attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
Dated: March 29, 2005              /s/ Steven M. Skow   Steven M. Skow, Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 18-20741

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Victor Delacruz Salas, also known as Jose Soto-Jimenez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-325-l

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Defendant-Appellant Victor Delacruz Salas appeals his sentence 

following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that there is an impermissible conflict 

between the oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment, 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should 

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 10, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 18-20741 Document: 00515559306 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2020
No. 18-20741

2

which included a surrender condition as a special condition of supervised 

release.

Salas did not have a meaningful opportunity to object in the district 

court. See United States v. Diggles, 957 F.3d 551, 559-63 (5th Cir. 2020) (en 

banc). Consequently, review is for an abuse of discretion. See United States 

v. Rivas-Estrada, 906 F.3d 346, 348-50 (5th Cir. 2018).

The record in this case reflects that the district court intended for 

Salas to be deported following his prison term. See United States v. VasquezPuente, 922 F.3d 700, 703-05 (5th Cir. 2019). The surrender condition was 

consistent with this intent and did not “broaden[] the restrictions or 

requirements of supervised release from the oral pronouncement.” Id. at 705 

(internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted). Consequently, 

the district court did not abuse its discretion by including the surrender 

condition in the written judgment. See id.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-20741 Document: 00515559306 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2020
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the amended Annual Report of Raser Technologies, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we
Kraig Higginson, Chief Executive Officer and R. Thomas Bailey, Treasurer of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The amended Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the amended Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.

Dated: 8-18-04                             /s/Kraig Higginson
      -----------------                    -------------------------------
                                           Kraig Higginson
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director


Dated: August 18, 2004                     /s/R. Thomas Bailey
      -----------------                    -------------------------------
                                           R. Thomas Bailey
                                           Treasurer
                                           and Director