alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1


    EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    Summary
      of Non-Employee Director Compensation

    


    Each
      non-employee director will receive an aggregate annual retainer fee of $30,000,
      payable in four equal quarterly installments. The members of the Company’s
      Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), other than the Chairman,
      will be paid an aggregate annual retainer fee of $5,000, payable in four equal
      quarterly installments. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee, currently
      Mark Skaletsky, will receive an aggregate annual retainer fee of $10,000,
      payable in four equal quarterly installments. The members of the Company’s Audit
      Committee (the “Audit Committee”), other than the Chairman, will be paid an
      aggregate annual retainer fee of $5,000, payable in four equal quarterly
      installments. The Chairman of the Audit Committee, currently Sheldon L. Bloch,
      will receive an aggregate annual retainer fee of $10,000, payable in four equal
      quarterly installments. 

    


     

    On
      the
      first Tuesday of each November, each non-employee director will be granted
      an
      option to purchase $100,000 in value of shares of the Company’s common stock
      pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Plan. These options
      will vest in full on the date of grant, have an exercise price equal to the
      fair
      market value of a share of the Company’s common stock as of the date of grant,
      and have a ten year term. The actual number of shares granted will be determined
      using a Black-Scholes option pricing model identical to that used by the Company
      for purposes of preparing its financial statements. In lieu of the foregoing
      annual grant for the first year of service on the Board, each newly-elected
      non-employee director will be granted an option to purchase $250,000 in value
      of
      shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s Amended and
      Restated 2000 Stock Plan on the date such director is elected to the Board.
      These options will vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the
      first
      anniversary of the date of grant, have an exercise price equal to the fair
      market value of a share of the Company’s common stock as of the date of grant,
      and have a ten-year term. The actual number of shares granted will be determined
      using a Black-Scholes option pricing model identical to that used by the Company
      for purposes of preparing its financial statements.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEYSECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, George H. Ellis, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof SoftBrands, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| /s/ George H. Ellis       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| George H. Ellis           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                      |
|                      |
| August 19, 2005      |

 

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R E DY AN T ON I O E S P I NO Z A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73101 A ge nc yN o. A 094- 316- 781 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F r e dyA nt oni o E s pi noz a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E lS a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , se e M oh am m ed v. 

# FI LED NO V 24 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73101 2 G on zales , 4 0 0 F . 3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 -9 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ), an dw e d en y i n p artan dd i sm i ss i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g E s p in o z a ’s m o tio n to re op en on the grou ndthathe fa i l ed t o d em on strat e the evi dence he subm i tt ed w as m a te r ia l an dp r e v io u s lyu n av a ilab le . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (1). W e l ackj u ri sd i ct i o n t o co n si d er E sp i n o za’ s ch al l en g e t o th e ad v erse c r e di bi l i tyf

i ndi ng c ont a i ne d i n the a ge nc y ’ s pr i oror de r s be c aus e thi s pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w is n o t tim e lya s to th o s e o r d e r s . See Si n gh v . I NS , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 8 6 , 1 1 8 8 ( 9 th C i r. 20 03 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AvizaTechnology, Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to his knowledge:

 

(1)           the accompanying reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periodspresented therein.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2006 |
|--------------------|
| By:                | /s/ Patrick C. O’Connor |   |
|               | Patrick C. O’Connor |
|               | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

EDWARD T. EGAN,

Petitioner

v.

RACHEL MCGRAW EGAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 812 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

EDWARD T. EGAN,

Petitioner

v.

RACHAEL MCGRAW EGAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 813 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of April, 2016, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

s0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144716

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144716

COA: 307107

Muskegon CC: 10

- 058929

- FH

MATTHEW RUSSELL TWINING,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David L. Osborn, the President of Hudson's Grill
International, Inc., certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | (Registrant)

HUDSON'S GRILL INTERNATIONAL,
INC.

By: s/s David L. Osborn

David L. Osborn, President

Date: April 14, 2008
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

f\sec\o01.071231
<FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION STAMP APPEARS HERE>


                FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION

    PRIVATE OPERATIONAL FIXED MICROWAVE RADIO STATION LICENSE


LICENSEE

GLOBAL PACIFIC INTERNET
770 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH, STE 3400
ORANGE, CA 92868

ASSOCIATED BROADCAST STATION

FILE NUMBER    748655

CALL SIGN      WPOT649

RADIO SERVICE
MW INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS

STATION CLASS
FIXED

EFFECTIVE DATE
07/07/1999

CONSTRUCTION DATE
01/07/2001

EXPIRATION DATE
07/07/2009

SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF GRANT: NONE

                              SITES

TRANSMITTER STREET ADDRESS           COUNTY             CITY          ST
ONE PARK PLAZA CIR                   ORANGE             IRVINE        CA


SITE NO.      LATITUDE          LONGITUDE         DATUM       ELEVATION (FT)
001           33-40-46.7 N      117-50-17.2 W      N27          75
002           33-41-31.1 N      117-49-21.4 W      N27         Receiver Site

TIP HEIGHT (FT)          ANTENNA PAINTING & LIGHTING CODES
308                      FCC FORM 715/715A


                         FREQUENCY PATHS

FREQUENCY AND POWER INFORMATION                     PATH
FREQUENCY        TOLERANCE      EMISSION            EIRP
(MHZ)            (%)            DESIGNATOR          (DBM)
OR CHANNEL
023325.000000    0.00010        50MOD7W             57.1


                               SEGMENT INFORMATION

SEG          EMIT    ANT     BEAM-      HTxWD POL   AZIM     RECEIVER
NO           SITE    HGT     WIDTH      (FT)        (DEG)    SITE CALL SIGN
             NO      (FT)    (DEG)                           NO
1            001     111     1.6            H       226.4      002  WPOT649
Case 2:17-cr-01423-DGC Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01423-DGC Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01423-DGC Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01423-DGC Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:17-cr-01423-DGC Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Marani Brands, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Margrit
      Eyraud, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May
                20, 2008
            By:
                /s/ Margrit EyraudMargrit
                EyraudChief
                Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135121 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135121 COA: 269299 Genesee CC: 05-017032-FC BOBBY JAMAR YOUNGER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 11097
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus PACOMIO BLANCO

- RUIZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:19

- cr

- 00454

- WMR

- CCB

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 23

- 11097

Before W ILSON , L UCK , and B LACK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Pacomio Blanco

‐ Ruiz appeals from the district court ’ s written judgment ordering an eight

‐ month term of imprisonment following the revocation of his supervised release. He a sserts his sentence should be vacated and remanded for imposition of a corrected judgment because the written judgment conflicts with the oral pronouncement at sentencing. The Government agrees thatwe should remand to allow the district court to correct the judgment to conform with the six

- month term. “Whe n a sentence pronounced orally and unambiguouslyconflicts with the written order of judgment, the oral pronouncement governs.” United States v. Bates , 213 F.3d 1336, 1340 (11th Cir. 2000). The remedy for a conflict between an orally pronounced
sentence and the written judgment is a limited remand with instructions to amend the judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. United States v. Chavez , 204 F.3d 1305, 1316 (11th Cir. 2000).
T he written judgment unambiguously contradicts the oral pronouncement at sentencing because it imposes an eight

‐ month sentence, but the district court said twice at sentencing that it was varying downward from eight months to six months. Blanco

- Ruiz does not offer any other arguments challenging the revocation of his super vised release or his six

- month sentence, and therefore, has abandoned any such challenges. See United States v. Campbell , 26 USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 2 of 323

- 11097 Opinion of the Court 3 F.4th 860, 873 (11th Cir.) ( en banc ) , cert. denied , 143 S. Ct. 95 (2022) (stating an issue not raise d on appeal will be deemed abandonedand will not be addressed on appeal absent extraordinary circumstances). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Blanco

- Ruiz’s supervised release and his sentence and remand to the district court for the limited purpos e of correcting the judgment to conform with the oral pronouncement of a six

- month term of imprisonment. AFFIRMED and REMANDED. USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 3 of 3
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 40 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require each standing 

committee to hold periodic hearings on the topic of waste, fraud, abuse, 

or mismanagement in Government programs which that committee may 

authorize, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. TANNER (for himself and Mr. CARDOZA) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require each standing committee to hold periodic hearings on the topic of waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement in Government programs which that committee 

may authorize, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That clause 2 of rule XI of the Rules of 

2 the House of Representatives is amended by adding at the 

3 end the following new paragraphs: 

4 ‘‘(n)(1) Each standing committee, or a subcommittee 

5 thereof, shall hold at least one hearing during each 120- 

6 day period following the establishment of the committee 

7 on the topic of waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 40 IH 

1 in Government programs which that committee may au2 thorize. 

3 ‘‘(2) A hearing described in subparagraph (1) shall 

4 include a focus on the most egregious instances of waste, 

5 fraud, abuse, or mismanagement as documented by any 

6 report the committee has received from a Federal Office 

7 of the Inspector General or the Comptroller General of 

8 the United States. 

9 ‘‘(o) Each committee, or a subcommittee thereof, 

10 shall hold at least one hearing in any session in which 

11 the committee has received disclaimers of agency financial 

12 statements from auditors of any Federal agency that the 

13 committee may authorize to hear testimony on such dis14 claimers from representatives of any such agency. 

15 ‘‘(p) Each standing committee, or a subcommittee 

16 thereof, shall hold at least one hearing on issues raised 

17 by reports issued by the Comptroller General of the United 

18 States indicating that Federal programs or operations 

19 that the committee may authorize are at high risk for 

20 waste, fraud, and mismanagement, known as the ‘high21 risk list’ or the ‘high-risk series’.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Case 3:17-cr-08288-SPL Document 1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:17-cr-08288-SPL Document 1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Aaron FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 46430.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 20, 1992.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 24, 1992.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 18, 1992.

David S. Durbin, Budesheim, Schlegel & Durbin, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Runzi, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J. and BRECKENRIDGE and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentia-ry hearing. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.-16(b).