alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.25

[TRAVELOCITY LOGO]

FEBRUARY 8, 2000


Ramesh Punwani
1, Park Hill Terrace
Princeton Junction, NJ 08550


Dear Ramesh:

As you know, on October 4, 1999 Preview and Travelocity announced plans to
merge. We anticipate the merger will close in the near future.

We are pleased to offer you employment with us as Chief Financial Officer with a
start date on or before 2/16/2000. We believe your background and abilities will
be an asset to the Company and will offer a mutually beneficial opportunity. As
a member of our team, you will receive an excellent compensation and benefit
package, including a monthly salary of $16,666.67. In addition, you will receive
a one time signing bonus of $25,000.00 which will be paid to you within 30 days
of your start date. You and your family will be relocated from Princeton to
Dallas under our corporate relocation plan. You will also be eligible to
participate in our incentive award, which will pay awards based on the Company
meeting pre-determined financial objectives. Your individual award will depend
upon both actual Company performance and your individual performance. The bonus
plan, of course, must be officially approved by our Board of Directors. We will
provide more details when we receive that approval.

As a Travelocity employee, you will also be eligible for the Company's benefit
programs including medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance, and
paid time off. An information sheet that outlines the benefit plans and
structure accompanies this letter. Please note that the details and limitations
of all benefit and compensation programs are subject to the Company's policies
and plans and may change from time to time in the Company's sole discretion.

Subject to the terms of an agreement with American Airlines, Inc. that expires
on June 30, 2008, you will be eligible for personal flight privileges for you,
your spouse and dependent children on American Airlines and American Eagle.
Certain space available flight privileges will also be available for
non-dependent children, other relatives, and friends on these airlines. As you
know, the pending spin of Sabre from AMR has resulted in certain changes in
flight privileges, primarily relating to individual taxation. Please see
http://source.sabre.com.

Finally, we feel that it is important that you have an ownership stake in the
Company. Therefore, our Board of Directors has approved our proposal to provide
to you, at close, an option to purchase 50,000 shares of Travelocity.com stock.
The grant price per option will be calculated on or about the close of the
merger. The terms and

<Page>

conditions will be governed by the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan and
individual stock agreements.

We hope you are excited about the great things Travelocity has to offer to all
of us. I look forward to working with you and I know with your help we will be
the world's #1 on-line travel company for a long time to come.



Sincerely,


/s/ Mary Morse
Mary Morse
Director, Recruiting
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09

- 1 8

- 00 2 31

- CV

____________________

CLEMON LEE WEST , Appellant

V.

KAYLA SAVOIE , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 126861

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Clemon Lee West filed a motion to dismiss the appeal , in which he

asserts that he and appellee Kayla Savoie have settled their claims

. The motion is

voluntarily made by West prior to any decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1. No other party filed a notice of appeal. We grant the motion and dismis s the

appeal.2 APPEAL DISMISS ED.

______________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on February 1 3, 2019

Opinion Delivered February 14, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton , JJ.
Second Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement With Andrew Batinovich



 Exhibit 10.11 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 WHEREAS, Andrew Batinovich (“Employee”) is currently employed by the Company as its President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an
executive employment agreement dated May 7, 2003, as amended (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the
Company (the “Board”) has determined that a provision in the Agreement could adversely impact the benefits the Company intended to confer on Employee under the Agreement as a result of a “change in control”; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the Agreement must be amended to address this provision in order to effectuate the Company’s intentions.

 Accordingly, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Part Three of the Agreement is amended by the addition of the following Section 10A: 

 Section 10A: Acceleration of Vesting; Lapse of Restrictions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10(c) above and regardless of whether
Executive’s employment terminates in a Qualifying Termination or otherwise, all stock options, restricted stock, and other equity awards held by Executive (including, without limitation, the restricted stock bonus awarded pursuant to the
“Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated Officer’s Restricted Stock Bonus Award Agreement”) shall vest 100% and be fully exerciseable and all restrictions on any such awards shall fully lapse immediately prior to the effective date of
the Change in Control. To the extent that any such accelerated vesting would trigger Excise Tax (as defined in Section 13, below), Executive shall be entitled to receive a Gross-Up Payment as provided in Part Four of this Agreement. 
 Except as otherwise provided in this Second Amendment, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 
  

			
	 GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST
 INCORPORATED:
	 	ANDREW BATINOVICH:
		
	 /s/ Patrick Foley
	 	 /s/ Andrew Batinovich

	Patrick Foley	 	Andrew Batinovich
	Chairman, Compensation Committee	 	President & Chief Executive Officer
		
	Date: August 21, 2006	 	Date: August 21, 2006
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Juan Antonio Castillo, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. CV-17-04101-PHX-DWL 

ORDER 

Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 19). The R&R, which was issued on December 28, 2018, 

recommended that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice and further provided 

that “[t]he parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this 

recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. . . . Failure 

timely to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation may result 

in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the district court without further 

review.” (Doc. 19 at 9.) 

Here, no such objections have been filed. Thus, the Court accepts the Magistrate 

Judge’s recommendation. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985) (“It does 

not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual 

or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to 

those findings.”); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[N]o 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 

filed.”). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1221 (9th Cir. 2003) 

(“[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 

de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”). 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 19) is accepted and adopted, that the Petition 

(Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice, and that the Clerk of Court shall enter 

judgment accordingly. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability and leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because dismissal of the petition is 

justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable. 

 Dated this 1st day of February, 2019.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

UDALL LAW FIRM, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

2198 E. CAMELBACK ROAD, SUITE 375

PHOENIX, AZ 85016

T (602) 222-4848

F (602) 222-4858

tburke@udalllaw.com

minuteentries@udalllaw.com

Thomas P. Burke, II SBN 9631

Bret S. Shaw SBN 31732 

Attorneys for Defendants Gene and Jeanne Roelfsema

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

MARIA C. BENITEZ,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GENE GORDON ROELFSEMA and 

JEANNE ROELFSEMA, husband and wife; 

JOHN DOES I-V; JANE DOES I-V; ABC 

CORPORATIONS I-V; XYZ 

PARTNERSHIPS I-V; Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

NO. 2:17-CV-04209-JJT

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF 

SERVICE OF MANDATORY

DISCOVERY

Notice of is given that on March 23, 2018 Defendants served Defendant’s Responses 

to Mandatory Discovery upon Plaintiff.

This service was accomplished this same date by emailing the above document to the 

email address below:

M. David Karnas, Esq.

KARNAS LAW FIRM, P.C.

karnas@karnaslaw.com

DATED this 23rd day of March, 2018. 

UDALL LAW FIRM, LLP

By/s/Bret S. Shaw

Thomas P. Burke, II

Bret S. Shaw

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:17-cv-04209-JJT Document 18 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UDALL LAW FIRM, LLP

2198 E. CAMELBACK ROAD, SUITE 375

PHOENIX, AZ 85016

T 602.222.4848

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on 23rd day of March, 2018, a copy of the foregoing 

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SERVICE OF MANTATORY DISCOVERY was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court, United States District Court, Arizona, and a 

copy of the foregoing e-served to all related parties via the Court’s CM/ECF System:

M. David Karnas, Esq.

KARNAS LAW FIRM, P.C.

565 S. 4th Avenue

Yuma, AZ 85364

Attorney for Plaintiff

By/s/Michelle Bryant

Case 2:17-cv-04209-JJT Document 18 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The table below lists DDi Corps consolidated subsidiaries. The ownership of these entities is as
follows:



|                                               |  |                             |  |                                                       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Name                                           |  | Jurisdiction ofOrganization |  | Ownership                                             
|DDi Intermediate Holdings Corp.                |  | California                  |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Corp.                      
|                                               |  |                            
|DDi Capital Corp.                              |  | California                  |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Intermediate Holdings Corp.
|                                               |  |                            
|Dynamic Details, Incorporated                  |  | California                  |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Capital Corp.              
|                                               |  |                            
|DDi Sales Corp.                                |  | Delaware                    |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|                                               |  |                            
|Sovereign Circuits, Inc.                       |  | Ohio                        |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|                                               |  |                            
|Sovereign Flex Products, LLC                   |  | Ohio                        |  | 100% directly owned by Sovereign Circuits, Inc.       
|                                               |  |                            
|DDi Canada Acquisition Corp.                   |  | Ontario, Canada             |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|                                               |  |                            
|Dynamic Details Canada, Corp.                  |  | Ontario, Canada             |  | 100% directly owned by DDi Canada Acquisition Corp.   
|                                               |  |                            
|Laminate Technology Corp.                      |  | Delaware                    |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|                                               |  |                            
|Dynamic Details Incorporated, Silicon Valley   |  | Delaware                    |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|                                               |  |                            
|Dynamic Details Incorporated, Colorado Springs |  | Colorado                    |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated  
|                                               |  |                            
|Dynamic Details Texas, L.L.C.                  |  | Delaware                    |  | 100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, Incorporated
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") of Parke Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Vito S. Pantilione, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John F. Hawkins, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Vito S. Pantilione

/s/ John F. HawkinsVito S. Pantilione

John F. HawkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial Officer)





August 14, 2012
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132452 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132452 

 COA: 271897 

Saginaw CC: 89-003189-FC 

STEVEN KENNETH ADAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 4, 2007 

 Clerk
Order entered December 30, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00450
- CV
WILLIAM RICHMOND , Appellant

V. FOREST GREEN MANOR , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 22
- 01665
- C

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 29, 2022 motion for an extension of time to file an amended brief as requested by the Court. We GRANT the
motion and extend the t ime to Monday, January 30, 2023. We caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 7,  2009                         |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA                          |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                    |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Case 2:17-mj-00518-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00518-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00518-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00518-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 4 of 4
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                    AGREEMENT DATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 23, 1999


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1999-11


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), Subservicer for BA Mortgage, LLC, successor in interest by merger
of NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), the Servicer in connection
with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-11, do hereby certify that
(i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year and of its performance under this Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made
under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under the
Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                       ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President



Inv M60
IV 

House Calendar No. 32 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 289 

[Report No. 111–57] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of March 30, 2009, pro6 viding for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 289 RH 

1 1388) to reauthorize and reform the national service laws, 

2 an amendment thereto, or a conference report thereon. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 32 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 289 

[Report No. 111–57] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

for other purposes. tions reported from the Committee on Rules, and with respect to consideration of certain resoluMARCH 26, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
H. Res. 424 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 12, 2009. 

Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary shall inquire whether the House should impeach Samuel B. Kent, a 

judge of the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Texas. 

SEC. 2. The Committee on the Judiciary or any subcommittee or task force designated by the Committee may, in 

connection with the inquiry under this resolution, take affidavits and depositions by a member, counsel, or consultant of 

the Committee, pursuant to notice or subpoena. 

SEC. 3. (a) For the purpose of the inquiry under this 

resolution, the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized to 

require by subpoena or otherwise— 

(1) the attendance and testimony of any person (including at a taking of a deposition by counsel or consultant of the Committee); and 

(2) the production of such things; 

as it deems necessary to such inquiry. 
2 

•HRES 424 EH 

(b) The Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, 

after consultation with the Ranking Member, may exercise 

the authority of the Committee under subsection (a). 

(c) The Committee on the Judiciary may adopt a rule 

regulating the taking of depositions by a member, counsel, or 

consultant of the Committee, including pursuant to subpoena. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Eddie BENNETT, Appellant.

No. WD 47101.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 25, 1994.

Lee M. Nation, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Bennett appeals his convictions of burglary in the first degree, murder in the second degree, and armed criminal action. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).