22074 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices

Response, Compensation and Liability

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), for

response costs incurred by the United

States at the Basket Creek Drum

Disposal site (the ‘‘Basket Creek site’’) in

Douglasville, Georgia. Under the

proposed consent decree, Young

Refining will pay $51,000 to the United

States in reimbursement of response

costs incurred by the Environmental

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) in

connection with the Basket Creek site.

Although the actual removal of

hazardous substances from the Basket

Creek Site was conducted by ChemNuclear Systems, Inc., EPA has incurred

costs in excess of $475,000 in

connection with the Basket Creek Site.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed

consent decree. Comments should be

addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and

should refer to United States v. Young

Refining Company, DOJ Ref. # 90–11–2–

755.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the office of the United

States Attorney, Richard Russell Federal

Building, Suite 1800, 75 Spring Street,

S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30335; the Region

4 Office of the Environmental Protection

Agency, 345 Courtland Ave., N.E.,

Atlanta, Georgia 30307; and at the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C.

20005, (202) 624–0892. A copy of the

proposed consent decree may be

obtained in person or by mail from the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C.

20005. In requesting a copy please refer

to the referenced case and enclose a

check in the amount of $4.25 (25 cents

per page reproduction costs), payable to

the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11801 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Antitrust Division

Proposed Termination of Judgment

Notice is hereby given that defendant,

Southern Forest Products Association

(‘‘SFPA’’), has filed with the United

States District Court for the Eastern

District of Louisiana a motion to

terminate the Judgment in United States

v. Southern Pine Ass’n, et al., Civil

Action No. 275, and that the Department

of Justice (‘‘Department’’), in a

stipulation also filed with the Court, has

tentatively consented to termination of

the Judgment but has reserved the right

to withdraw its consent pending receipt

of public comments. The complaint in

this case (filed February 21, 1940)

alleged that the Southern Pine

Association (‘‘SPA’’) and its lumber

company members had fixed prices,

curtailed output, enforced an agreed

policy of distribution and excluded

others from engaging in trade and

commerce.

On February 21, 1940, a Judgment

was entered against the SPA and its

members which inter alia created the

SOUTHERN PINE INSPECTION

BUREAU (‘‘SPIB’’) as a separate entity

to perform lumber grading and

standards activities. The Judgment also

enjoined the defendants from carrying

out statistical activities related to prices,

limiting production, and attempting to

control distribution. In 1969, the

Judgment was amended to allow SPIB to

incorporate in Louisiana as a non-profit

corporation and in 1993 the Judgment

was amended to make certain technical

changes in the way SPIB conducts its

business. In 1970, the name of the SPA

became the SFPA.

The Department has filed with the

court a memorandum setting forth the

reasons why the Government believes

that termination of the Judgment would

serve the public interest. Copies of

SFPA’s motion papers, the stipulation

containing the Government’s consent,

the Government’s memorandum and all

further papers filed with the court in

connection with this motion will be

available for inspection at the Legal

Procedure Unit of the Antitrust

Division, Room 215 North, Liberty

Place, Washington, D.C. 20530, and at

the Office of the Clerk of the United

States District Court for the Eastern

District of Louisiana, 500 Camp Street,

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130. Copies

of any of these materials may be

obtained from the Antitrust Division

upon request and payment of the

copying fee set by Department of Justice

regulations.

Interested persons may submit

comments regarding the proposed

termination of the decree to the

Government. Such comments must be

received by the Division within sixty

(60) days and will be filed with the

court by the Government. Comments

should be addressed to Christopher S.

Crook, Acting Chief, San Francisco

Office, Antitrust Division, Department

of Justice, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box

36046, San Francisco, California 94102

(Telephone: (415) 436–6660).

Rebecca P. Dick,

Deputy Director of Operations.

[FR Doc. 96–11797 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice Pursuant to the National

Cooperative Research Act of 1984—

Enterprise Computer Telephony Forum

Notice is hereby given that, on

February 20, 1996, pursuant to Section

6(a) of the National Cooperative

Research and Production Act of 1993,

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the

Enterprise Computer Telephony Forum

(‘‘ECTF’’) has filed written notifications

simultaneously with the Attorney

General and the Federal Trade

Commission disclosing (1) the identities

of the parties and (2) the nature and

objectives of the venture. The

notifications were filed for the purpose

of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting

the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to

actual damages under specified

circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b)

of the Act, the identities of the parties

are: Analogic Corporation, Peabody,

MA; Amteva, Glen Allen, VA; Apple

Computers, Cupertino, CA; Aspect

Telecommunications, San Jose, CA;

AT&T Network Systems, Glen Allen,

VA; Bellcore, Red Bank, NJ; Brooktrout

Technology, Needham, MA; Centrigram

Communications, San Jose, CA; Cintech

Tele-Management Database Network

Services, Cincinnati, OH; CSETL,

Torino, ITALY; Database Network

Systems, Minnetonka, MN; Dialogic

Corporation, Parsippany, NJ; Dinatel

Corporation, San Jose, CA; Digital

Equipment Corporation, Merrimack, NJ;

Ericsson Business Networks AB,

Stockholm, SWEDEN; Fujitsu Limited,

Kawasaki, JAPAN; Hewlett-Packard

Company, Cupertino, CA; IBM

Corporation, San Jose, CA; InterVoice,

Dallas, TX; Mitel Corporation, Kanata,

CANADA; Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg,

IL; Natural MicroSystems Corp., Natick,

MA; Networks Unlimited AG,

Dusseldorf, GERMANY; Nortel,

Nashville, TN; Novell, Inc., San Jose,

CA; Periphonics, Bohemia, NY;

Rockwell International, Downers Grove,

IL; Siemens AG, Munich, GERMANY;

Unimax, Minneapolis, MN; and

Voicetek Corporation, Howell, NJ.

ECTF is a California nonprofit mutual

benefit membership corporation which

has been established to conduct joint

research and development in the area of

interoperable implementation

specifications in the field of computer

telephony integration (CTI). ECTF is

dedicated to promoting the acceptance