alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.5

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. II

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Florida Holding Co. II (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 11, 2007



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPrincipal Executive Officer




34
#### Robert YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63762.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 22, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 23, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied April 26, 1994.

Henry W. Cummings, St. Charles, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order dismissing with prejudice his 24.035 motion on the merits without an evidentiary healing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MICHAEL WILLIAMS, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 241 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1862
ABDUL S. AHMADY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus BRINCEFIELD, HARTNETT, TOMPKINS, AND CLARK, P.C., Defendant - Appellee,

versus AMINA AHMADY, Plaintiff. Appeal from th e United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00119-CMH) S u b m i t t e d : N o v e mb e r2 1 , 2 0 0 6 Decided: November 2 8 , 2006 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 -

Abdul S. Ahmady, Appe l l a nt Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins, Brincefield, Hartnett & Associates, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Abdul S. Ahmady appeals th e district court’s orders dismissing Ahmady’s complaint and denying Ahmady’s “Retrying Motion Court Order Misunderstanding,” which the district court construed as as Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. The distri c t c o u r t found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ahmady v. Brincefield, No. 1:06-cv-00119-CMH (E.D. Va. May 19, 2006 and June 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NUMBER 13-21-00188-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MICHAEL MCCANN, TDCJ #879919, Appellant,

 v.

MEGAN THOMPSON, ET AL., Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant, Michael McCann, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order issued 

by the trial court. Appellant is on the list of vexatious litigants compiled by the Office 

of the Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System, and he has been prohibited 

from filing any more litigation in Texas courts without permission of a local 

administrative judge. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.104; see generally
2

https://www.txcourts.gov/judicial-data/vexatious-litigants/. 

The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the attempted appeal fails to 

comply with the vexatious litigant statute. Appellant was advised that unless he has 

obtained the permission of the local administrative judge and provided a copy of such 

order permitting the filing of this appeal within ten days from the date of receipt of

this notice, the appeal would be dismissed. 

Appellant has failed to respond to the Court’s directive and the record before the 

Court fails to show that appellant obtained the permission of the local administrative 

judge to file this appeal. With limited exceptions not applicable to this case, "a clerk of 

a court may not file a litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented 

by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the 

litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing." TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to 

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c). 

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

16th day of September, 2021.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40961

Summary Calendar

KENNETH CRISSUP,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HONORABLE THOMAS GREENWELL; JAMES ODELL; MARK W. 

STOLLEY,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:13-CV-137

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth Crissup, Texas prisoner # 1258732, appeals the dismissal of his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Judge Thomas Greenwell, James Odell, and 

Mark Stolley. We affirm.

Crissup alleged that the defendants conspired to deprive him of his due 

process rights and conspired to provide false information to Texas appellate 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40961 Document: 00512633622 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2014
No. 13-40961

courts concerning his criminal trial. Additionally, he alleged that Greenwell 

exhibited bias against him and created false documents that became part of 

the trial record, that Odell presented false information to the state courts, and 

that Stolley–his defense attorney–provided ineffective assistance of counsel. 

Crissup has abandoned his claims based on § 1983. See Yohey v. Collins, 

985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). He now identifies subsections (2) and (3) 

of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 as statutory bases for his action. We review this claim for 

plain error. See Crawford v. Falcon Drilling Co., 131 F.3d 1120, 1123-29 (5th 

Cir. 1997); Forbush v. J.C. Penney Co., 98 F.3d 817, 822 (5th Cir. 1996). On 

plain error review, we may exercise our discretion to grant relief if Crissup 

establishes an error that is clear or obvious, that affects his substantial rights, 

and that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the 

proceedings. See Crawford, 131 F.3d at 1123-29; Alaniz v. Zamora-Quezada, 

591 F.3d 761, 776 (5th Cir. 2009). 

The complaint’s claims involving the Due Process Clause and state court 

proceedings do not implicate subsections 2 and 3 of § 1985. See Montoya v. 

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 614 F.3d 145, 149 (5th Cir. 2010). Thus,

Crissup has not shown that there was any error at all, much less clear or 

obvious error, in denying him § 1985 relief. See id.; Alaniz, 591 F.3d at 776. 

Crissup has abandoned, by failing to brief it, his claim that the district 

court abused its discretion by denying a new trial. See Yohey, 985 F.2d at 224-

25. Additionally, Crissup fails to show that the district court abused its 

discretion with regard to discovery. See Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 231-32

(1991). 

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-40961 Document: 00512633622 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/16/2014
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

ThermoLife International LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States Department of Health and 

Human Services, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-04049-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

A Notice of Settlement (Doc. 14) having been filed, 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter will be dismissed with prejudice 60 days after 

the docketing of this order unless the parties file a stipulation to dismiss prior to that date. 

The settlement constitutes an accord which has extinguished the underlying claim. All 

pending hearings and motions are deemed moot. 

 Dated this 14th day of March, 2018. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:17-cv-04049-JJT Document 15 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12610]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2852; Illinois

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on May 6, 
1996, I find that Franklin and St. Clair Counties in the State of 
Illinois constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe 
storms and flooding beginning on April 28, 1996 and continuing. 
Applications for loans for physical damages may be filed until the 
close of business on July 5, 1996, and for loans for economic injury 
until the close of business on February 6, 1997 at the address listed 
below: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One 
Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. or other locally 
announced locations. In addition, applications for economic injury 
loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous 
counties may be filed until the specified date at the above location: 
Clinton, Hamilton, Jackson, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Perry, 
Randolph, Saline, Washington, and Williamson Counties in Illinois; and 
St. Louis County and the City of St. Louis, Missouri.
    Interest rates are:

                                                                        
                                                                        
                                                                        
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere.................       .250
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere..............      3.625
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses and non-porfit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere.......................................      4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere.......................................      7.125
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere................................      4.000
                                                                        

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 285206. 
For economic injury the numbers are 885700 for Illinois and 885800 for 
Missouri.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-12610 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Mark POWER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

No. 56676.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 23, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied April 17, 1990.

Cheryl Rafert, St. Louis, for movant-ap-pellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the *646reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25850-25851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12986]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on 
the Disposal and Reuse of the Tooele Army Depot Base Realignment and 
Closure (BRAC) Parcel

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announced its Record of Decision 
(ROD) on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the 
disposal and reuse of the 1,700-acre BRAC parcel at Tooele Army Depot, 
Tooele, Utah. In accordance with the Defense Base Closure and 
Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510, as amended.
    Under the Act, the Secretary of the Army has been delegated the 
authority to dispose of excess real property and facilities located at 
a military installation being closed or realigned. The Army is required 
to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act during the process 
of property disposal and must prepare appropriate analyses of the 
impacts of disposal and, indirectly, of the reuse of the property on 
the environment. The ROD and the FEIS satisfy requirements of the law 
to examine the environmental impacts of disposal and reuse of the 
Tooele BRAC parcel.
    Encumbered disposal involves the transfer of property to others 
with use restrictions imposed by the Army. The ROD concludes that 
surplus property will be conveyed, subject to restrictions identified 
in the FEIS, that relate to the following: measures to protect ground 
water quality, utilities interdependencies, and remedial activities. 
The Army will impose reservations or deed restrictions, as necessary 
and appropriate, to protect human health, the environment, and public 
safety.
    The Army has taken all practicable measures to avoid or minimize 
environmental harm associated with its preferred alternative of 
encumbered property disposal. The Army will continue to work with 
individual future owners to avoid, reduce, or compensate for adverse 
impacts that might occur as

[[Page 25851]]

a result of disposal. Mitigation measures for reuse activities are 
identified in the FEIS.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the ROD may be obtained by writing Mrs. Shirley 
Barnett at the U.S. Army Materiel Command, ATTN: AMCSO, 5001 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22333-0001 or by calling (703) 617-8172.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Raymond J. Fatz,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army, (Environmental, Safety 
and Occupational Health) OASA (IL&E).
[FR Doc. 96-12986 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12558]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


NIOSH Meeting

    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: A Cohort Mortality Study of Workers at the Fernald Feed 
Materials Production Center.
    Time and Date: 7 p.m.-9 p.m., June 19, 1996.
    Place: The Plantation Catering and Meeting Center, Oak Room, 
9660 Dry Fork Road, Harrison, Ohio 45030.
    Status: Open to the public for observation and comment, limited 
only by the space available. The meeting room accommodates 
approximately 50 people.
    Purpose: The purpose of this meeting is to report the findings 
of a cohort mortality study of workers who were employed at the 
Fernald Feed Materials Production Center between 1951-1981. The 
study was conducted by the Oak Ridge Association Universities 
(ORAU). The study findings will be presented by the former Project 
Director, Dr. Donna Cragle, who is currently the Director, Center 
for Epidemiologic Research at ORAU. The study was managed by NIOSH 
and funding was provided by the Department of Energy (DOE).
    Contact Person For Additional Information: Richard W. Hornung, 
Dr.P.H., Associate Director for Energy-Related Health Research, 
Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, 
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, M/S R-44, 
4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, telephone 513/841-
4400.

    Dated: May 14, 1996.
Nancy C. Hirsch,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 96-12558 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-19-M
EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Crown Media Holdings, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-37588) on Form S-8 of Crown Holdings, Inc. of our reports
dated March 12, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of
Crown Media Holdings, Inc. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective
January 1, 2006.



Denver,
Colorado
March 12, 2008

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 365 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 46
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 365

                          [Report No. 111-87]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2009

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of April 28, 2009, providing 
for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany 
the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth the 
congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 
2010, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, 
and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 
2011 through 2014.
                                                  House Calendar No. 46

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 365

                          [Report No. 111-87]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 27, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The OLB Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronny Yakov,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
      adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ Ronny
                YakovRonny
                YakovChief
                Executive OfficerMay
                __, 2008
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-135197, of Spare Backup, Inc. and the
related prospectuses of our audit report dated March 24, 2009 with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and cash
flows of Spare Backup, Inc. and its subsidiary for the year ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 appearing in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Boca Raton, Florida
April 13, 2009