alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lou Ellen Ficke, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Discovery Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date:  June 30, 2005
    /s/ Lou Ellen FickeLou Ellen Ficke,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26874-26875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13316]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26875]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
chapter 35).
    Agency: Patent and Trademark Office (PTO).
    Title: Initial Patent Application.
    Form Numbers: Agency--PTO/SB/01/02/03/04/05/17/18/19/20.
    Agency Approval Number: 0651-0032.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 2,387,000 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 221,000.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 10.8 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The purpose of this information collection is to 
permit the Patent and Trademark Office to determine whether an 
application meets the criteria set forth in the patent statutes and 
regulations. The application paper quality, size, and format 
requirements will facilitate the automatic processing and digital image 
and/or optical character recognition scanning of application materials. 
The standard Fee Transmittal form (PTO/SB/17), New Utility Patent 
Application Transmittal form (PTO/SB/05), New Design Patent Application 
Transmittal form (PTO/SB/18), New Plant Patent Application Transmittal 
form (PTO/SB/19), Plant Color Coding Sheet (PTO/SB/20), Declaration 
(PTO/SB/01), and Plant Patent Application Declaration (PTO/SB/03) will 
assist applicants in complying with the requirements of the patent 
statutes and regulations, and will further assist the PTO in processing 
and examination of the application.
    Affected Public: Any individual filing a patent application.
    Frequency: When filing a patent application.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: Maya A. Bernstein (202) 395-3785.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing DOC clearing officer, Linda Engelmeier, 
Department of Commerce, Room 5327.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Maya A. Bernstein, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20230.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Linda Engelmeier,
Department Clearance Officer, Office of Management and Organization.
[FR Doc. 96-13316 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION www.edgaradvantage.com


QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
 

Exhibit 10.16

Confidential treatment requested  




  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LICENSE AGREEMENT
  BETWEEN
  UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI
  AND
  SEATTLE GENETICS, INC.         


    This Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement (the "Amendment") is made as of August 4, 2000 by and between University of Miami and its School of
Medicine, whose principal place of business is at 1600 N.W. 10th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33136 ("Licensor"), and Seattle Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation having offices at
22215 26th Avenue SE, Bothell, WA 98021 ("Licensee"). 


    WHEREAS,
Licensor and Licensee are parties to that certain License Agreement dated September 20, 1999 (the "Agreement") 


    WHEREAS,
Licensor and Licensee wish to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment; 


    NOW
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 



	1.
	Section 8.1(d)
is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



	"(d)
	Running
Royalty in an amount equal to (i) [*] percent ([*]%) of the Net Sales of the Non-Conjugated Products and
Conjugated Products and (ii) [*] percent ([*]%) on the Net Sales of the Non-Conjugated
Products and Conjugated Products equal to or exceeding [*] dollars ($[*]) for the years [*] through [*]
(years [*]) of this Agreement; provided, that, if royalties are paid pursuant to (ii) above, (i) shall not apply. 










    The
Parties, intending to be legally bound, have caused this Amendment to be executed by their authorized representatives on the dates set forth below. 



	UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI	 	SEATTLE GENETICS, INC.
	 
 By:	 
 	 

/s/ ALAN FISH   	 
 	 

By:	 
 	 

/s/ H. PERRY FELL   
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 

Name:	 
 	 

Alan Fish	 
 	 

Name:	 
 	 

H. Perry Fell
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 

Title:	 
 	 

VP, BNS & DEV	 
 	 

Title:	 
 	 

Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 

Date:	 
 	 

8/4/00	 
 	 

Date:	 
 	 

July 20, 2000
	 	 	
	 	 	 	






[*]   Confidential treatment requested 


1








QuickLinks


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI AND SEATTLE GENETICS, INC.
Exhibit 32.01






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asian Dragon Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Karlsson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ John Karlsson


By: John Karlsson


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





Dated: July 20, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# -)1,132-02- D-£G-x: HoMorcx^k ClerK, 

# A.p£JL^/~<2C>/^ J tiA\/e R.g-cieiVed This i_p|i«»r Mpcx-4 fi ro/^ 

# Leo/U Cpun-t-y OLsfrrcf ClerK 6evev-ty VJi\SQ/J. <^ fiflcW y 

# ,Sfo.4e/Ni^ She has fprufc-rglej My /Lo1 Dr/1- UA)/P Mn4- Receiver} A uK?W Ca^l Pro/u -fh? 

# fru^V nC criM^nal Appals, IT A/u £e^ug.sl/'fj^ ITf 

# you cp\k! Please Se.KjJ Me Q/Oe, Also J./K /^e^o-es-f/AJj 

# -Por Aa/ ijjp \)a\<>A Dnrkrl 5>h?ef -Par My nuikl fiecr^A. P)f..cc5e. U.Se fhe 5efP AsUrgs^s 5JAMP £a/x/W/>£ fW 'fh-e. __6gj-UHJgJ X^forMA-lvoAJ, 

# TnAKjK Vq^ f^r Voar 77m^ /-joNJorcJjk C|<?rK; Abe) flcoS^A TD.dtel^ 

# SpujiMi^ *w**?ft 'gib F/n 3$a4 

# H^vHiej^W^ ££1 

# Coor-V CfluuSeffi CM-JP-aHl- 1

RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPFEALS- -APR23 2015 AbelAcosta,Clerk87th, 278th, 369th Judicial Districts

April 13,2015 Leon County District Clerk 139 East Main-Street P. O. Box 39 Centerville, Texas 75833 Office (903) 536-2227 Fax (903)536-5058

Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk Court ofCriminal Appeals State ofTexas
. . . ._ '.. PO Box 12308, Capital Station Austin, Texas 78711 Re: Trial Court Writ ofHabeas Corpus # CM-10-241 -1 Trial Court Cause # CM-10-241 Ex Parte: John William Spurlock Dear Honorable Clerk, Enclosed, please find the Clerk'sRecord on theApplication for 11.07 WritofHabeas Corpus on the above referenced cause. Should you need further information, please contact myoffice at903-536-2227. Sincerely,

Beverly Wils&r Leon County District Clerk

cc: Honorable Hope Knight Leon County District Attorney PO Box 1010 Centerville, Texas 75833 John William Spurlock #01678212 Wynne Unit 810 FM 2821 •. Huntsville, Texas 77349 

## ArrIt«a/-aoir 

# AM *qp^ ao/5 T^Oc^S&P&Q 

# ys£,S^^i4
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11398]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Little River Canyon National Preserve, Alabama

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice--acceptance of concurrent jurisdiction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of Alabama has conveyed 
to the National Park Service (NPS) concurrent jurisdiction over all the 
lands and waters within the exterior boundaries of Little River Canyon 
National Preserve, Alabama.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Concurrent jurisdiction, pursuant to the Agreement 
discussed below, became effective on March 28, 1996, upon the 
acceptance by the NPS from the Governor of Alabama.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Little River Canyon 
National Preserve, Fort Payne, Alabama 35967. Telephone 205-997-9239.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 26, 1981, the United States, acting 
in accordance with provisions of 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1a-3 and 40 U.S.C. 
Sec. 255, and the State of Alabama, acting in accordance with Sec. 42-
3-1 Code of Alabama 1975, entered into an Agreement, whereby concurrent 
jurisdiction was established over lands and waters within certain 
specified units of the National Park System within the State of 
Alabama.
    Paragraph IV on page 3 of the Agreement provides ``That if pursuant 
to an Act of the United States Congress, additional National Park 
Service units, not set out herein, are created within the State of 
Alabama, that this agreement may be modified by amendment to 
incorporate these subsequently created units into the said Agreement, 
making the units subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 
said Agreement''.
    Based on this Agreement, the United States and the State of Alabama 
have determined that it is to their mutual benefit to amend the 
aforementioned Agreement for the purposes of establishing concurrent 
jurisdiction for Little River Canyon National Preserve. Governor Fob 
James of the State of Alabama conveyed concurrent jurisdiction over all 
the lands and waters within the exterior boundaries of Little River 
Canyon National Preserve through an amendment to the existing Agreement 
of concurrent jurisdiction over lands and waters within National Park 
System units in the State of Alabama. On March 28, 1996, Roger G. 
Kennedy, Director of the National Park Service, Department of the 
Interior accepted this jurisdiction from the State of Alabama.

    Dated: April 16, 1996.
Chris L. Andress,
Acting Associate Director, Park Operations and Education, National Park 
Service.
[FR Doc. 96-11398 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
WO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Hector Parra-Francisco )

 )

 )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

 vs. ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

)

United States of America, ) Case: CV-06-00136-PHX-FRZ

) CR-01-00616-PHX-FRZ

 Respondent. )

____________________________)

X DECISION BY COURT. This action came under

consideration before the Court. The issues have been

considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Amended § 2255 Motion for

Time Reduction by an Inmate in Federal Custody (U.S.D.C.

document #56 in CR-01-0616-PHX-FRZ) is DENIED and this case

(CV-06-00136-PHX-FRZ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

February 6, 2006 RICHARD H. WEARE 

Date CLERK

 S/ M. Michelle Mejia 

 M. Michelle Mejia

 Deputy Clerk

Copies to: 

J/B, FRZ, Parra-Francisco, all Counsel

Case 2:01-cr-00616-FRZ Document 60 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 1
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30627 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. RO DN EY POW ELL , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 2: 01- C R
- 81- 7 B ef ore JO L L Y , W IE N E R , an d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * R o d n e yP o w e ll , fe d e r a l p r is o n e r#2 7 4 5 7 -0 3 4 , a p p e a ls th e d is t r ic tc o u r t ’s den i alof

hi s 18 U . S . C . § 3582 (c) ( 2) m ot i on t o reduce h i s sentence f or c on spi racy t o possess w i t h i n t en t t o di st ribu t e cocai n e base and coc ai n e hy drochlor i de ba sed on A m en dm en t706 of t h e Sen t en ci n g G u i del in es. H e argu es t h at t h e di st ri ct c o u r t a b u s e dits d is c r e tio n w h e n it d e n ie dh is m o tio n s o le ly o n th e b a s is th a t h is ori gi n alsentence w as bel ow both t h e ori gi n al an d am en ded gu i del i n es r an ges. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Ma rc h 31, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 08-30627 Document: 00511067423 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2010N o. 08- 30627

2 A lth o u g h P o w e ll h a s c o m p le te d h is te r m o f im p r is o n m e n t, h e is cu r r e n tly s e r v in gh is te r m o f s u p e r v is e dre le a s e . A c c o r d in g ly , t h is a p p e a l is n o t m o o t. S ee Joh n son v. Pet t if

ord , 4 42 F. 3d9 17 , 9 18 ( 5t h Ci r . 2 00 6) . W e r ej e c tt he G ove r nm ent ’ s as se r t i on t hatPow el lw aived t he r i ght t o br i ng t he i nst antappeal u n d e rth e te r m s o f h is p le a a g r e e m e n t. S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. Cooley , 590 F. 3d 293 (5 th C ir. 2 0 0 9 ). Ap r o c e e d in gu n d e r§ 3 5 8 2 (c )(2 ) is n o t a fu ll re s e n te n c in g . Un i t ed S t ate s v . Evan s , 5 8 7 F .3 d6 6 7 , 6 7 1 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ), pet i t i on f or c ert . f i led , (Jan. 28, 2010) ( N o. 09-8939). C on sequ en t l y, t h e bi f u rcat ed reason ableness r evi ew st an da rd a ffo r d e ds e n te n c in gd e c is io n s is in a p p lic a b le in th e § 3 5 8 2 (c )(2 ) c o n te x t. I d. at 672 . R ather, w e revi ew t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s det erm i n ati on of w h et h er t o reduce a s e n te n c e fo ra n a b u s e o f d is c r e tio n . Cooley , 590 F . 3d at 297 . W h ere, as here, t he r ec or d show s t hatthe di st r i c tcour tgave du e c ons i der at i on t o t he m ot i on as a w h ol e an d i m pl i ci t l y consi dered the fact ors i n § 355 3( a) , w e di scer n no ab u se o f d is c r e tio n . Se ei d. ; Un i t ed S t ate s v. W h i t ebi rd , 55 F . 3d 100 7, 101 0 ( 5th C i r. 1 9 9 5 ).AF F I RMED. Case: 08-30627 Document: 00511067423 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2010
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 375 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 375

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 29, 2010.
Whereas, each year, about 5,000 workers are killed due to workplace-related 
        injuries in the United States, and more than 2,000,000 workers across 
        the world die of workplace-related accidents and diseases;
Whereas, each day, an average of 14 workers are killed due to workplace injuries 
        in the United States;
Whereas there are about 3,700,000 occupational injuries and illnesses in the 
        United States annually;
Whereas tens of thousands of Americans with workplace injuries or illness become 
        permanently disabled;
Whereas more people are killed worldwide each year at work than in wars;
Whereas, on February 7, 2010, 6 workers were killed and 26 injured when there 
        was a massive natural gas explosion at the Kleen Energy power plant in 
        Middletown, Connecticut;
Whereas, on April 2, 2010, 7 workers were killed by a fire at the Tesoro oil 
        refinery in Anacortes, Washington;
Whereas, on April 5, 2010, 29 miners were killed and 2 were injured in a massive 
        explosion at the Upper Big Branch Mine in Raleigh County, West Virginia, 
        in the worst coal mine disaster in 40 years;
Whereas, on April 20, 2010, there was an explosion and fire on the British 
        Petroleum-leased Transocean Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf 
        of Mexico 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana in which 17 workers were 
        injured and 11 workers went missing;
Whereas observing Workers' Memorial Day allows us to honor and remember victims 
        of workplace injuries and disease; and
Whereas observing Workers' Memorial Day reminds us of the need to strive for 
        better worker safety and health protections: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Workers' Memorial Day to honor 
        and remember workers who have been killed or injured in the workplace;
            (2) recognizes the importance of worker health and safety standards;
            (3) encourages the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 
        the Mine Safety and Health Administration, industries, employers, and 
        employees to support activities aimed at increasing awareness of the 
        importance of preventing illness, injury, and death in the workplace; 
        and
            (4) calls upon the people of the United States to observe such a day 
        with appropriate ceremonies and respect.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

y0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

142645 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142645 

 COA: 297681 

Wayne CC: 07-020145-FC 

LARRY THOMAS SANDERS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted November 22, 2011 *

Decided November 23, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 11

‐ 1585

AIRRION BLAKE

‐ BEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs

‐ Appellants,

v.

COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,

Defendant

‐ Appellee. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 10 C 5246

Samuel Der

‐ Yeghiayan,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Airrion Blake

‐ Bey, Airrion Blake

‐ Bey II, Anita Blake

‐ Bey, and Lovie Hunter

‐ El are

adherents of the Moorish Science Temple of America and were born in Cook County,

Illinois. In this pro se lawsuit, they claim that the county has enslaved them by creating

birth certificates which falsely imply they are Americans rather than citizens of a Moroccan NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

* After examining the briefs and record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and record. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P.

34(a)(2)(c).No. 11

‐ 1585 Page 2

Empire that spans the Western Hemisphere, Africa, and the mythical Atlantis. The plaintiffs

demand varied relief, including $5 billion. The district court dismissed their complaint, and

rightly so because the suit is too frivolous to have invoked the court’s subject

‐ matter

jurisdiction. See Hagans v. Lavine

, 415 U.S. 528, 536 (1974); In re African

‐ American Slave

Descendants Lit.

, 471 F.3d 754, 757 (7th Cir. 2006); Crowley Cutlery Co. v. United States

, 849

F.2d 273, 276 (7th Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED

.