alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LLC.









Date: August 14, 2009





/s/Michael
A. Reisner


Michael A. Reisner


Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON Capital Corp.


Manager of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
#### Rudes Corporation, Plaintiff, *v.*Farid Sons, Ltd., et al., Defendants.

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan,

May 7, 1956.

*Edward Pious*for plaintiff.

*Henry L. Finkelstein*for Tagakotta Sotto, defendant.

Nathaniel Sorkin, J.

Motion to vacate warrant of attachment is denied. Plaintiff sets forth a prima facie cause of action against defendant Sotto, a nonresident of the State.

Concededly, Sotto is domiciled in and a permanent resident of Pakistan; he arrived in this country on February 2, 1956, as a temporary visitor for his “ own personal affairs and busi*862ness ”; he was registered at the Hotel Chesterfield in New York during his entire stay in the United States; the warrant of attachment was issued on March 5, 1956, and personally served on Sotto, March 12, 1956; he departed from this country on March 26, 1956.

Such absence from a permanent residence and presence as a transient sojourner at a hotel in New York do not establish the status of resident of New York under the statute which permits attachment where “ the defendant is either a foreign corporation or not a resident of the State ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 903).

The circumstances of defendant Sotto’s presence in the State differ from that of the defendant Dorsey in the case cited by defendant herein *(Loew’s Inc.*v. *Dorsey,*197 Misc. 1069), wherein Dorsey had no permanent residence and his stay in a New York hotel, though temporary, was his only place of abode at the time of the issuance of the attachment.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12988]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Chief Of Naval Operations Executive Panel; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given that the Chief of Naval 
Operations (CNO) Executive Panel will meet on June 27, 1996 from 9:30 
to 11 a.m. at the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, 2000 Navy 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000. This session will be closed to the 
public.
    The purpose of this meeting is to conduct the final briefing of the 
Naval Support to the Land Battle Task Force to the Chief of Naval 
Operations. These matters consititue classified information that is 
specifically authorized by Executive order to be kept secret in the 
interest of national defense and are, in fact, properly classified 
pursuant to such Executive order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the 
Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires that 
all sessions of the meeting be closed to the public because they will 
be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c) (1) of title 5, 
United States Code.
    For further information concerning this meeting, contact Janice 
Graham, Assistant for CNO Executive Panel Management, 4401 Ford Avenue, 
Suite 601, Alexandria, Virginia 22302-0268, Telephone (703) 681-6205.

    Dated: May 14, 1996.
M.A. Waters,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-12988 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10002]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 11

[Docket No. 28518; Amendment No. 11-41]

General Rulemaking Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is making an editorial 
change to part 11 by changing the words ``rule making'' and ``rule-
making'' to read ``rulemaking''. This change is being made for 
consistency.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 24, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clara Thieling, Office of the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division, AGC-
200, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3123.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    In response to inquiries as to the uniformity of the spelling of 
the word rulemaking, the FAA is making an editorial change to part 11 
to change the spelling of ``rule-making'' and ``rule making'' to 
``rulemaking''. Because this action is merely a technical amendment, 
the FAA finds that prior notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(3)(B) are unnecessary. For the same reason, the FAA finds that 
good cause exists for making this amendment effective upon publication.

The Amendment

    The FAA amends 14 CFR part 11 as follows:

PART 11--GENERAL RULEMAKING PROCEDURES

    1. The authority citation for part 11 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40101, 40103, 40105, 40109, 40113, 
44110, 44502, 44701-44702, 44711, and 46102.

    2. In the heading and throughout part 11, remove the words ``rule-
making'' and ``rule making'' wherever they appear, and add the word 
``rulemaking'' in their place.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 29, 1996.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations, Office of the Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-10002 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
#### Jerry CRONEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66827.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 30, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 14, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and GRIMM, C.J.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Appellant, Jerry Croney, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Carol Yvonne BOLING, Respondent.

No. 94-SC-1008-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Feb. 16, 1995.

*598
      *OPINION AND ORDER*

This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the Respondent, Carol Yvonne Boling, has been charged with two counts of unethical and unprofessional conduct. Specifically, she is charged with a violation of SCR 3.130-1.3, which requires a lawyer to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, herein, one Doris Ross Crowe. Ms. Boling was paid a retainer by Ms. Crowe to handle a real estate matter which remained unresolved for a period in excess of three years. In Count II, Respondent is charged with a violation of SCR 3.130 — 1.16(d) which requires a lawyer, upon termination of representation, to take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interests, specifically herein, failure to return papers and documents to her client and failure to refund the unearned portion of her attorney fee.

Respondent has made no defense to these charges. The Board of Governors voted unanimously to find Respondent guilty on both charges.

As to discipline, the vote of the Board of Governors was as follows: thirteen for a six-month suspension to run consecutively with the suspension ordered in a separate disciplinary case, which we are also deciding this day; and four votes for a six-month suspension to run concurrent with that disciplinary ease.

The Board of Governors also recommended that Ms. Bowling not be allowed to reapply for admission until the records and documents were returned to the clients in both this ease and ease number 94-SC-1010-KB.

The Court adopts the decision of the Board of Governors relating to all matters herein.

The Respondent, Carol Yvonne Boling, is adjudged guilty as charged, and is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of six months from the date of entry of this order, said suspension to run consecutively with the suspension ordered in 94-SC-1010-KB.

Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Carol Yvonne Bol-ing shall, within ten (10) days of the date of entry of this Order, notify all courts in which she has matters pending and all clients for whom she has actively involved in litigation and similar legal matters of her inability to represent them, and of the necessity and urgency of promptly retaining new counsel. Such notification shall be by letter duly and timely placed in the United States Mail, and the Respondent shall simultaneously and in the same manner provide a copy of all such letters to the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association.

Further, Respondent shall not be allowed to apply for reinstatement to the Bar until the records and documents belonging to her former client are returned to her.

The Kentucky Bar Association shall have from the Respondent, Carol Yvonne Boling, recovery of all costs of this proceeding pursuant to SCR 3.450.

All concur, except REYNOLDS, J., not sitting.

ENTERED: February 16, 1995.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice
Case 2:17-mj-00470-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00470-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00470-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00470-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 4 of 4
IV 

House Calendar No. 42 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 269 

[Report No. 111–79] 

Supporting the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2009 

Ms. GIFFORDS (for herself and Mr. BURGESS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Additional sponsors: Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. BROWN of South 

Carolina, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, and Mr. DUNCAN

APRIL 21, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month. 

Whereas approximately 7,000,000 motorcyclists ride on our 

Nation’s roads and highways to commute, travel, and 

recreate; 

Whereas motorcycles are a valuable component of the transportation mix; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 269 RH 

Whereas motorcycles are fuel-efficient and decrease congestion while having little impact on our Nation’s transportation infrastructure; 

Whereas the United States is the world leader in motorcycle 

safety, promoting education, licensing, use of protective 

gear, and motorcycle awareness; 

Whereas the motorcycling community is committed to decreasing motorcycle crashes through licensing, training, 

education, enforcement, personal responsibility, and increased public awareness; 

Whereas, according to a comprehensive study conducted on 

motorcycle crash causation in the United States the ‘‘Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of 

Countermeasures’’ (Hurt Report), in approximately twothirds of fatal car-motorcycle crashes, the driver of the 

car was at fault; 

Whereas motorcycle awareness is beneficial to all road users 

and will help to decrease car-motorcycle crashes; 

Whereas May is designated as ‘‘Motorcycle Safety Awareness 

Month’’; and 

Whereas the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

promotes Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month to encourage riders to always wear helmets and other protective 

gear, never drink and ride, be properly licensed, and get 

training and to remind all riders and motorists to always 

share the road: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the contribution motorcycles 

3 make to the transportation mix; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 269 RH 

1 (2) encourages all road users to be more aware 

2 of motorcycles and motorcyclists’ safety; 

3 (3) encourages all riders to receive appropriate 

4 training and practice safe riding skills; and 

5 (4) supports the goals of Motorcycle Safety 

6 Awareness Month. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 42 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 269 

[Report No. 111–79] 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals of Motorcycle Safety 

Awareness Month. 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION



I, Anthony N. DeMint,
certify that:



1. I have
		reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Calif Acquisitions, Inc.;
2. Based on
		my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
		of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
		the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
		statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
		by this report;
3. Based on
		my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
		included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
		the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
		small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
		annual report;
4. I am the
		sole officer and director and I am responsible for establishing and
		maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
		Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
		have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
> 				disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
> 				supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> 				small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
> 				is made known to me by others within those entities,
> 				particularly during the period in which this report is being
> 				prepared;
> 		Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer
> 				disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
> 				my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
> 				controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
> 				this report based on such evaluation; and
> 		Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
> 				during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
> 				(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
> 				of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
> 				reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. I have
		disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
		financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the
		small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
		equivalent functions):

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> 				design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
> 				which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
> 				business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
> 				report financial information; and
> 		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
> 				other employees who have a significant role in the small
> 				business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 7,
2005





/s/ Anthony N. DeMint_________

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief Accounting
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of W. S.  INDUSTRIES,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James
F. Dempsey,  Chief Financial  Officer,  respectively,  of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 29, 2006


/s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
___________________________
    James F. Dempsey
    Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MAURICE PEARSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 464 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12319]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Cleveland County, NC

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice of intent to advise the public 
that an environmental impact statement (EIS) will be prepared for a 
proposed highway project in Cleveland County, North Carolina.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Roy Shelton, Operations Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601, 
Telephone (919) 856-4350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the North 
Carolina Department of Transportation, will prepare an environmental 
impact statement (EIS) on a proposal to provide improved traffic flow 
along US 74 in the vicinity of Shelby. The proposed project would 
consist of construction of US 74 to a multi-land freeway on new 
location or upgrading existing US 74. The proposed highway is 
considered necessary to handle existing and projected traffic demand; 
and to provide a more direct link with full control of access between 
Charlotte and Asheville than that currently available via I-85 and I-
26.
    Alternatives under consideration include: (1) taking no action (No 
Build); (2) improvement of existing route (Upgrade); and (3) Northern 
and Southern Build alternatives and five crossovers, which combine to 
form 24 possible project-wide alternatives.
    Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments have 
been sent to the appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies and to 
private organizations who have previously expressed interest in this 
project. A series of public meeting have been held for this projects: 
additional public meetings and a public hearing will also be held. 
Public notice will be given of the time and place of the meetings and 
hearing. The draft EIS will be made available for public and agency 
review and comment.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to the proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments and 
questions concerning the proposed action and the EIS should be directed 
to the FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Research, Planning and Construction. The regulations 
implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental 
consultation on Federal progress and activities apply to this 
program.)

    Issued on: May 2, 1996.
Roy C. Shelton,
Operations Engineer, Raleigh, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 96-12319 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Dr. Panos Kontzalis and Harvey Lalach, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Anavex Life
      Sciences Corp. for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Anavex Life Sciences Corp.                                                                      

|Dated: February 14, 2008         | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|                                 | 
|                                 | 
|/s/ Panos
      Kontzalis        | 
|Dr. Panos Kontzalis, CEO         | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)    | 
|                                 | 
|                                 | 
|                                 | 
|/s/ Harvey Lalch                 | 
|Harvey Lalach                    | 
|President, CFO and Secretary     | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and | 
|Principal Accounting Officer)    | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Anavex Life
Sciences Corp. and will be retained by Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---