alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH I FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of UCFH I Finance, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 3, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 15, 2005



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)




32
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 324 

Expressing support for designation of April 2009 as ‘‘Jazz Appreciation 

Month’’ and April 25, 2009, as ‘‘Willis Conover Day’’, and honoring 

the global impact of jazz music. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of April 2009 as ‘‘Jazz 

Appreciation Month’’ and April 25, 2009, as ‘‘Willis 

Conover Day’’, and honoring the global impact of jazz 

music. 

Whereas it is universally acknowledged and accepted by Congress that April is ‘‘Jazz Appreciation Month’’, and H. 

Res. 57 (100th Congress) proclaimed jazz a national 

American treasure; 

Whereas the ‘‘Big Band Jam’’ was created in 2005 to bring 

big band jazz to the Nation’s capital; 

Whereas the Big Band Jam will showcase the music of student musicians and recognizes the importance of educating our youth about America’s unique jazz heritage; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 324 IH 

Whereas Washington, DC, area high schools, colleges, universities, and military ensembles come together once a year 

to share their appreciation of jazz, and they help bridge 

the gap between cultural diversity, age, education, and 

income through the music; 

Whereas the Big Band Jam is produced in cooperation with 

many esteemed cultural and government agencies, which 

include museums, art organizations, memorials, and municipal agencies, all dedicated to increasing the awareness 

and appreciation of jazz; 

Whereas, on April 25, 2009, the Big Band Jam will honor 

the Voice of America and Willis Conover and the joint 

contribution toward spreading the language of jazz and 

American cultural diplomacy around the world over a 

span of more than 35 years; 

Whereas the public shall share together in a celebration of 

the global impact of jazz music, an American treasure, 

that will feature America’s own Smithsonian Jazz 

Masterworks Orchestra, under the musical direction of 

National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) Jazz Master 

David N. Baker, as they each and all pay tribute to 

‘‘America’s Jazz Musical Masters’’; 

Whereas April 2009 would be an appropriate month to designate as ‘‘Jazz Appreciation Month’’; and 

Whereas April 25, 2009, would be an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘Willis Conover Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Jazz Appreciation Month’’ and ‘‘Willis 

3 Conover Day’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2008

of WorldSpace, Inc.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of WorldSpace, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ SRIDHAR GANESAN                                             
|                   |  |  |  | Sridhar Ganesan Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
Case 2:17-mj-07548-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07548-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07548-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-07548-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Marc Kilbride, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CenterPoint Energy Transition BondCompany II, LLC;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:November 9, 2007         /s/ Marc Kilbride   Marc Kilbride   Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
================================================================================

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the Annual Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Periodic
Report"),  I,  David  Roff,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    the  Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the  information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


     Dated: April 1, 2010


     /s/ "David Roff"


     David Roff
     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT, AS AMENDED

 

I, Jerre L. Stead, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IHS Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has material affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 25, 2009

 
| /s/ Jerre L. Stead                   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Jerre L. Stead                       |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Rediff.com India Limited (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ajit Balakrishnan, the principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 15, 2013



By:

/s/ Ajit BalakrishnanAjit BalakrishnanChairman and Managing Director (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of pSivida Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Ashton, Managing Director of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2007



|                |  |                  
|--------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Paul Ashton
|Name:           |  | Paul Ashton      
|Title:          |  | Managing Director
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of HXT Holdings, Inc. (the "Company" on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report", each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/Yuanqing Li


Yuanqing Li


Chief Executive Officer


February 18, 2011





/s/Ding Hong Shen


Ding Hong Shen


Chief Financial Officer


February 18, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HXT Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by HXT Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gilbert Mota,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

No. CV-17-00555-TUC-EJM

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). (Doc. 29). 

Under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may file a 

“motion to alter or amend a judgment.” The Ninth Circuit has explained that [s]ince 

specific grounds for a motion to amend or alter are not listed in the rule, the district court 

enjoys considerable discretion in granting or denying the motion.” McDowell v. 

Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 n.1 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc) (per curiam) (internal 

quotation marks omitted). But amending a judgment after its entry remains “an 

extraordinary remedy which should be used sparingly.” Id. (internal quotation marks 

omitted). In general, there are four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be 

granted: (1) if such motion is necessary to correct manifest errors of law or fact upon 

which the judgment rests; (2) if such motion is necessary to present newly discovered or 

previously unavailable evidence; (3) if such motion is necessary to prevent manifest 

injustice; or (4) if the amendment is justified by an intervening change in controlling law.
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Id.; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Herron, 634 F.3d 1101, 1112 (9th Cir. 2011). Rule 59(e) “may not 

be used to relitigate old matters, or to raise arguments or present evidence that could have 

been made prior to the entry of judgment.” Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 

485 n.5 (2008) (citation omitted).

The Court’s previous Order (Doc. 26) fully explained the Court’s reasoning for its 

decision. The Court will not repeat itself again here. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion to Alter or Amend 

Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). (Doc. 29).

Dated this 9th day of September, 2019.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of De Baun Gurnee et al., as Trustees under the Will of Eugene A. Gurnee, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

July 3, 1956.

*Campbell & Hills*for Harry Sanger and another, assignees.

*Clark, Higson & Litsch*for Eugenie K. B. Degen, assignor.

*Allison & Gerzof*for Edwin Duryea.

*Max E. Lynne*for Morris Feldman and another, assignees.

*Edwin L. Garvin,*special guardian.

*Alfred J. Bedard*for De Baun Gurnee and another, as trustees under the will of Eugene A. Gurnee, deceased, petitioners,

*993Maximilian Moss, S.

This is a motion addressed to the report of the Referee to hear and report on the issues raised by the objections filed to the trustee’s account.

The motion seeks to disaffirm that part of the Referee’s report which recommends a finding that priority be given to an assignment bearing an earlier date but recorded subsequent to an assignment bearing a later date. The later dated instrument was found by the Referee to be a valid assignment but subject and subordinate in priority to the earlier dated instrument. The motion also seeks to disaffirm that part of the Referee’s report which recommends that a certain described assignment dated February 9, 1953 was in fact given to secure a loan.

Section 32 of the Personal Property Law governs the priority of assignments in decedent estates and makes the date of recording the determining fact *(Matter of Kaufman,*149 Misc. 287; *Matter of Kitching,*141 Misc. 704; *Matter of Kloppenburg,*134 Misc. 168, 172, affd. 227 App. Div. 739). In the absence of adequate proof of actual notice of the existence of a prior assignment having been given to the assignee of the first recorded instrument, the priority of the lien of the first recorded instrument must be maintained *(Matter of Leverich,*135 Misc. 774, affd. 234 App. Div. 625; *Matter of Kaufman, supra).*The finding of the Referee which recommends granting priority to the assignment dated March 4, 1952 recorded January 19, 1953 is reversed. The recommendation of the learned Referee concerning the validity of the assignment of January 12, 1953 is upheld.

The court cannot find an adequate basis for the conclusion arrived at in respect of the validity of the assignment dated February 9, 1953. The assignor having executed an instrument expressive of a jural act is conclusively bound by the consequences which were reasonably to have been anticipated by its signing *(Pimpinello*v. *Swift & Co.,*253 N. Y. 159; *Mencher*v. *Weiss,*306 N. Y. 1, 4). Ignorance through negligence or inexcusable trustfulness cannot relieve this assignor from her contractual obligations *(Metzger*v. *Ætna Ins. Co.,*227 N. Y. 411, 416; *Matter of Level Export Corp. [Wolz, Aiken & Co.],*305 N. Y. 82, 87). The court on the evidence before the learned Referee finds that the assignment of February 9, 1953 from Eugenie K. B. Degen to Rita B. Sanger as trustee was absolute and not as security for a loan.

The motion is granted in all respects and the determinations of the Referee in the respects above stated are reversed. Settle order and decree on notice.