alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 27, 2014 | By:    | /s/  Dror Svorai   |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Dror Svorai             |   |
|                 |   | President and Treasurer |   |

|   | By:    | /s/  Dror Svorai   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Dror Svorai             |   |
|   |   | President and Treasurer |   |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13004]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Cross Disciplinary Activities; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 920463, 
as amended), the Nationals Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Cross Disciplinary Activities 
(#1193).
    Date and Time: June 13, 1996 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Room 1150, 1120, 1105.17, 1105.05.
    Contact Person(s): Drs. Merrill Patrick and Robert Voigt, 
Program Director, CISE/Directorate, Room 1105, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Telephone: (703) 306-1900.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate CISE Academic Research 
Infrastructure proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated May 20, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13004 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








To my
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Ulticom, Inc.











Date:  April
      20, 2010
            By:
            /s/  Mark.
      A. KissmanMark.
      A. KissmanSenior
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Case 2:17-cr-01449-JAT Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01449-JAT Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01449-JAT Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01449-JAT Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12951]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Joint Meeting of the 
ACRS Subcommittees on Materials and Metallurgy and on Severe Accidents

    The ACRS Subcommittees on Materials and Metallurgy and on Severe 
Accidents will hold a joint meeting on June 3-4, 1996, Room T-2B3, 
11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Monday, June 3, 1996--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business
Tuesday, June 4, 1996--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business

    The Subcommittees will discuss operating experience, technical 
issues, and rulemaking efforts associated with steam generator 
performance. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, 
analyze relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions 
and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittees, their consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make 
oral statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named 
below five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittees, along 
with any of their consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittees will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and the Nuclear 
Energy Institute, and other interested persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements, and the time 
allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Mr. Noel F. Dudley (telephone 301/415-6888) between 
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting 
are urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the 
agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 96-12951 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Seifi Ghasemi,certify that:

1.                  Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RockwoodHoldings, Inc.;

2.                  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)            Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)            Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)            Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 15,  2006 | /s/ SEIFI  GHASEMI                    |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                     | Seifi Ghasemi                         |
|                     | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |                                  |
|                     |                                  |

 

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Osborn, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Hudson's Grill International, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the periods presented in this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date:	March 31, 2006 | /s/David L. Osborn

[Signature]

President
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------

f\sec\o01.051231
Order entered August 4, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00833-CV

IN RE KATHRYN L. SHILLING, Relator

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-01659-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is relator’s July 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus. The Court 

requests real parties in interest and respondent file their responses, if any, to the petition on or 

before August 21, 2017.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12804]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Noise 
Certification Issues

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss noise certification issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 12, 1996, at 9 a.m. Arrange for 
oral presentations by May 31, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the General Aviation 
Manufacturers Association, suite 801, 1400 K Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolina Forrester, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-206), 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-9690; fax (202) 
267-5075.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Sec. 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
to be held on June 12, 1996, at the General Aviation Manufacturers 
Association, Suite 801, 1400 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. The 
agenda will include:
    <bullet> Opening Remarks.
    <bullet> Committee administration.
    <bullet> Presentation of Work Plan by the FAR/JAR Harmonization 
Working Group for Helicopters.
    <bullet> Presentation of Work Plan by the FAR/JAR Harmonization 
Working Group for Propeller-Driven Small Airplanes.
    <bullet> Presentation of Work Plan by the FAR/JAR Harmonization 
Working Group for Subsonic Transport Category Large Airplanes and 
Subsonic Turbo jet Powered Airplanes.
    <bullet> A discussion of future meeting dates, activities, and 
plans.
    <bullet> Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but will be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements by May 31, 1996, 
to present oral statements at the meeting. The public may present 
written statements to the committee at any time by providing 25 copies 
to the Executive Director, or by bringing the copies to him at the 
meeting. In addition, sign and oral interpretation can be made 
available at the meeting, as well as an assistive listening device, if 
requested 10 calendar days before the meeting. Arrangements may be made 
by contacting the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 15, 1996.
Paul R. Dykeman,
Assistant Executive Director for Noise Certification Issues, Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-12804 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-03-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Marc Shipley, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

City of Tucson, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-17-00558-TUC-DCB

ORDER 

 This matter was stayed during the pendency of the criminal proceeding related to 

the Plaintiff’s allegations brought here alleging that Tucson City Police Officer Stacy 

Rosado violated his Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights by unlawfully 

searching his vehicle and/or running the serial numbers on the weapons found during the 

alleged search. Plaintiff was ordered to file status reports with the Court beginning on 

July 1, 2018. He did not do this. The Court shall afford Plaintiff an opportunity to show 

cause why this case should not be dismissed because the criminal matter has been 

decided against him, including a determination that the seizure of the weapons at issue in 

this case and the search of the weapon for the serial number did not violate the 

Constitution. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall file a written show cause statement with 

the Court within 30 days of the filing date of this Order why this case should not be 

dismissed. 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event the Plaintiff does not show cause 

to not dismiss the case, it shall be dismissed forthwith. 

 Dated this 15th day of October, 2018.
#### Jimmie HENSLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65479.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 4, 1994.

*420Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Ralph A. Dobberstein, St. Louis, for respondent.

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

The Director of Revenue (Director) appeals the circuit court’s judgment ordering the Director to reinstate petitioner’s driving privileges (if eligible) after they had been suspended under the administrative suspension provisions of §§ 302.500-302.541, (RSMo 1986 & Supp.1993).1 Petitioner’s suspension was sustained after an administrative hearing and petitioner sought a trial *de novo*in the circuit court pursuant to § 302.535. After the trial *de novo,*the court entered judgment in favor of petitioner. We reverse and remand.

The trial *de novo*was held on January 6, 1994. There, the Director attempted to have her Exhibit A admitted into evidence as a business record. *See*§ 490.680. Exhibit A contained, *inter alia,*the breathalyzer printout, the breathalyzer maintenance report, the Alcohol Influence Report, and the police report of the arresting officer. The Director attempted to establish the exhibit’s foundation as a business record through the notarized affidavit of Doris Mae Brady (custodian of records for the Department of Revenue-DWI Division), *see*§ 490.692, RSMo Supp. 1993, also contained in Exhibit A. Petitioner objected to the exhibit on the ground that admitting the exhibit into evidence would violate his right to confront and cross-examine the arresting officer. The court sustained the objection on that ground, and subsequently entered judgment in favor of petitioner due to the Director’s failure to move forward with the evidence.

We agree with the Director that the exhibit was erroneously excluded. The business records act constitutes an exception to the hearsay rule. *See, Goodloe v. Director of Revenue,*838 S.W.2d 506, 508 (Mo.App.W.D.1992). When evidence is admissible un der any recognized exception to the hearsay rule, then an objection based on the lack of an opportunity to confront or cross-examine is not valid. *State v. Pieron,*755 S.W.2d 303, 307 (Mo.App.1988); *Osborne v. Purdome,*250 S.W.2d 159, 163 (Mo. banc 1952).

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause remanded.

GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ., concur.

1

. All statutory citations are RSMo 1986, unless otherwise noted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Travis Colelay, Jr.,

Defendant.

No. CR-17-08292-001-PCT-DJH

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was held on the record including a proffer 

by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the 

terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, 

pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing 

evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 13th day of November, 2019.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 196TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 23rd 

day of September, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Jamey Justin Smith, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00042-CR

Trial Court No. 28,912

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jamey Justin Smith, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 23rd day of November, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEONID ZELDICH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.