In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas 

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-24-00030-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023-003805-2 

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. 

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

QUIET GROUP LLC AND KEITH JOHNSON, Appellants

V. 

READY CABLE, INC., Appellee
2 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Pro se Appellant Keith Johnson filed a notice of appeal on behalf of himself 

and Appellant Quiet Group LLC from the trial court’s final judgment against them.

 Johnson, however, is not an attorney. A company may not appear through a 

member who is not an attorney. See, e.g., Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp.,

USA, 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996) (“Generally a corporation may be represented 

only by a licensed attorney . . . .”); Sherman v. Boston, 486 S.W.3d 88, 95 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. denied) (“Legal entities, such as . . . a limited liability 

company, generally may appear in a district or county court only through a licensed 

attorney.”). On January 30, 2024, we wrote to Johnson to explain to him that he could 

not represent Quiet Group because he is not an attorney, and we warned him that we 

could dismiss the appeal unless a licensed attorney filed a notice of appearance for 

Quiet Group by February 9, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

 No licensed attorney has appeared for Quiet Group.1 Because Quiet Group has 

failed to obtain counsel as directed by our January 30, 2024 letter, we dismiss its

1

On February 8, 2024, we received a letter from Johnson asking us for a threeweek extension to retain counsel. We construed Johnson’s letter as an extension 

motion and notified him that if he did not submit a certificate of conference and pay 

the $10 motion filing fee by March 1, 2024, we could deny the motion or return it to 

him unfiled. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 9.5, 10.1(a)(5); see also Supreme Court of Tex., Fees 

Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial 

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing 

courts of appeals’ fees). As we have not received either a certificate of conference or

the filing fee, we return Johnson’s motion to him unfiled.
3

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f), 44.3; Collins Motor Co., L.L.C. v.

FirstCapital Bank of Tex., N.A., No. 02-20-00192-CV, 2020 WL 5047510, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Fort Worth Aug. 27, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.); Infracon USA, LLC v. Funding

Circle Partners, LP, No. 02-19-00423-CV, 2020 WL 719431, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort 

Worth Feb. 13, 2020, pet. denied) (per curiam) (mem. op.).

We must dismiss Johnson’s appeal as well. Johnson’s brief was due on May 6, 

2024, but he did not file one. On May 17, 2024, we notified Johnson that his brief had

not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that 

we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, Johnson

filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably

explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because Johnson has failed to file a brief even after we afforded him an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss his appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Quiet Group and Johnson must pay all costs of this appeal.

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Elizabeth Kerr

Justice

Delivered: July 3, 2024