alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Sinisa Djurdjic,

Defendant.

No. CR-17-01658-001-TUC-JGZ (DTF)

ORDER 

Upon motion of defendant and there being no objection, IT IS ORDERED that 

supervision from Pretrial Services is removed as a condition of release.

All other conditions remain in full force and effect.

Dated this 14th day of September, 2020.

Case 4:17-cr-01658-JGZ-DTF Document 84 Filed 09/14/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 4:17-cr-01658-JGZ-DTF Document 84 Filed 09/14/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.3



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH I FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of UCFH I Finance, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 3, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 16, 2005



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)




31
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
LEGALPLAY ENTERTAINMENT INC.


/s/ Cecil Morris                        Date: March 31, 2006
---------------------------------
Cecil Morris
Director, President / Secretary
-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jason D. Lamm (018454)

Law Office of Jason Lamm

6245 North 24th Pkwy, Ste. 208

Phoenix, AZ 85016-2030

Tel: (602) 222-9237

Fax: (602) 222-2299

Email: jlamm@cyberlawaz.com

David J. Don (016462)

LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J. DON, PLLC

301 E. Bethany Home Rd., Suite B-100

Phoenix, Arizona 85012

Tel: 480-948-1212

Fax: 480-696-7756

Email: david@azcivilrights.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Leslie A. Merritt, Jr.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leslie A Merritt, Jr., a single man, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

State of Arizona, a body politic; Bill 

Montgomery, the elected Maricopa 

County Attorney, in his official and 

individual capacities; Maricopa 

County, a body politic; Heston Silbert, 

in his individual capacity; Christopher 

Kalkowski, in his individual capacity; 

Frank Milstead, in his individual 

capacity; Ken Hunter, in his individual 

capacity; Kelly M. Heape, in his 

individual capacity; Jennifer Pinnow, 

in her individual capacity, Anthony 

Falcone, in his individual capacity.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: CV17-4540-PHX-DGC

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF 

SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF’S 17TH

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE 

STATEMENT

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC Document 202 Filed 11/21/18 Page 1 of 3
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff, through undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice that a copy of his 

17

th Supplemental Disclosure Statement was sent to all parties to this action, via 

electronic mail, on today’s date

DATED THIS 21st day of November, 2018.

LAMM & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

By: /s/ Jason D. Lamm

Jason D. Lamm

Attorney for Plaintiff Leslie Merritt, Jr.

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC Document 202 Filed 11/21/18 Page 2 of 3
-3-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 21st day of November, 2018, I electronically 

transmitted the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system 

for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF 

registrants:

Clerk of the Court

United States District Court, District of Arizona

Sandra Day O’Connor Courthouse

401 W. Washington St.

Phoenix, AZ 85003

Michele Iafrate, Esq.

Iafrate & Associates

649 North Second Avenue

Phoenix, Arizona 85003

miafrate@iafratelaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants Maricopa County and William Montgomery

Edward F. Novak, Esq.

Melissa Ho, Esq.

Jonathan G. Brinson, Esq.

Polsinelli PC

One East Washington Street, Suite 1200

Phoenix, AZ 85004

enovak@polsinelli.com; mho@polsinelli.com, jbrinson@polsinelli.com

Attorneys for Defendant State of Arizona, Heston Silbert, Christopher Kalkowski, 

Frank Milstead, Ken Hunter, Kelly M. Heape, Jennifer Pinnow, Anthony Falcone

By: /s/ Kathryn A. Miller

Kathryn A. Miller

Case 2:17-cv-04540-DGC Document 202 Filed 11/21/18 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.5b

SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL AGREEMENTS TO TRANSITION POWER
PURCHASE AGREEMENT CONSTITUTING EXHIBIT 10.5a HERETO

1.       Amended and Restated Transition Power Purchase Agreement by and among
         Sithe Energies, Inc., Sithe Pennsylvania Holdings LLC, Sithe Maryland
         Holdings LLC, Sithe Power Marketing, L.P. and Pennsylvania Electric
         Company dated as of November 24, 1999
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Wells Fargo Bank NA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Wyo Tech Investment Group LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-04140-PHX-DWL

ORDER 

Now pending before the Court is the Judgment Creditors’ “Ex Parte Motion for 

Leave to Make Alternative Service of Subpoenas on Purported Wyo Tech Investors.” 

(Doc. 262.) In a nutshell, the motion seeks permission to serve document subpoenas on 

four non-parties (Mike Spaulding, Mike Wilhelm, Lewis Henkind, and Tom Burgess) by 

means other than personal service—specifically, by (1) sending the subpoena, via 

overnight FedEx, to each non-party’s last known address and (2) emailing a copy of the 

subpoena to the attorney who previously filed a motion to quash on behalf of the nonparties.

The motion will be granted in part and denied in part. In an earlier order in this 

case, the Court addressed the circumstances under which a Rule 45 subpoena may be 

served by means other than personal service. Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Wyo Tech Inv. Grp. 

LLC, 2019 WL 3208114 (D. Ariz. 2019). Among other things, this order noted that, 

although it is unclear whether a showing of diligence should be required in this context, 

“[m]any courts” impose such a diligence requirement. Id. at *3 n.3.
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Here, the materials submitted by the Judgment Creditors establish that they 

exhibited diligence when attempting to locate and personally serve three of the four nonparties (Wilhelm, Spaulding, and Henkin). However, the Judgment Creditors have not 

established diligence with respect to the remaining non-party (Burgess), who appears to 

have simply moved out of state months ago. There is no evidence that Burgess is actively 

evading the subpoena and it is unclear what steps the Judgment Creditors have taken to 

discover his new out-of-state address. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) The Judgment Creditors’ Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Make Alternative 

Service of Subpoenas on Purported Wyo Tech Investors (Doc. 262) is granted in part and 

denied in part; and 

(2) The Judgment Creditors are granted leave to serve nonparties Mike

Spaulding, Mike Wilhelm, and Lewis Henkind with document subpoenas, with a return

date of two weeks after entry of this order, by (1) overnight FedEx to (a) for Mike 

Spaulding, 10869 North Scottsdale Road, #130-135, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 and 2061 

East Charleston Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85022; (b) for Mike Wilhelm, 2059 East 

Michigan Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85022; and (c) for Lewis Henkind, 9673 East Oberlin 

Way, Scottsdale, Arizona 85262; and (2) e-mail to their counsel in this action, Mr. Zlaket, 

at tom@zlaketlaw.com.

Dated this 21st day of October, 2019.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE



For value received, Leslie S. Robins, (the "Borrower") promises to pay to the
order of Advanced Optics Electronics, Inc. (the "Lender") One Hundred and Twenty
Thousand Dollars ($120,000.00) with interest at ten percent (10%) per year,
computed on the basis of 360-day years.

Interest payments of $3,000.00 shall be payable in arrears quarterly on
September 21; December 21; March 21 and June 21 of each year starting with
September 21, 2000. The principal amount of this note shall be payable at the
end of 36 months on June 21, 2003. The borrower shall have the right to prepay
all or any part of this note at any time without penalty.


Date:  Wednesday, June 21, 2000




 /s/ LESLIE S. ROBINS
-------------------------------
Leslie S. Robins
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00239-CV

DR. JOHN SZABUNIEWICZ, Appellant

V.

KING INVESTMENTS, INC., PHILLIP 

KING, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF THE EARL KING, DECEASED AND 

PHILLIP S. KING, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 342nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (342-329405-21)

September 14, 2023

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Case 2:17-mj-07541-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-mj-07541-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-mj-07541-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 3 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Mikkel Jordahl, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Mark Brnovich, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-17-08263-PCT-DJH

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court are (1) the State of Arizona’s Motion to Intervene (Doc. 

24), to which no response has been filed; (2) six motions from various amici curiae

seeking to file briefs in support of the defendants (Docs. 30, 32, 33, 35, 37, and 41); and 

(3) a Joint Motion Requesting a Hearing Date on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction and the State of Arizona’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 47). In their request for a 

hearing date, the parties specifically request one hour of argument time and agree there is 

no need for the presentation of evidence. After review of these motions, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendant State of Arizona’s unopposed 

Motion to Intervene (Doc. 24); 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Motions to File Amicus Curiae filed 

by the American Jewish Committee (Doc. 30), the States of Nevada and Texas (Doc. 32), 

the Zachor Legal Institute (Doc. 33), the Israel Emergency Alliance (Doc. 35), the Louis 

D. Brandeis Center Incorporated (Doc. 37), and the American Center for Law & Justice 

(Doc. 41). Defendants are represented by counsel and therefore any information the 

Case 3:17-cv-08263-DJH Document 48 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

amici curiae wish to offer can be submitted to counsel for presentation to the Court. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED granting the parties’ request for a hearing date on 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendant State of Arizona’s Motion to 

Dismiss (Doc. 47). Accordingly, a Motion Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction (Doc. 6) and Defendant State of Arizona’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 28) is 

hereby scheduled for May 23, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 605 of the Sandra Day 

O’Connor United States Courthouse at 401 W. Washington Street in Phoenix, Arizona 

85003. These motions are fully briefed; each side will be permitted thirty (30) minutes to 

address the Court. No evidence will be presented or taken at this hearing. 

Dated this 28th day of March, 2018. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 3:17-cv-08263-DJH Document 48 Filed 03/28/18 Page 2 of 2
IV 

House Calendar No. 83 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 537 

[Report No. 111–189] 

Requesting that the President and directing that the Attorney General transmit to the House of Representatives all information in their possession 

relating to specific communications regarding detainees and foreign persons suspected of terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2009 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 26, 2009 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, referred to the 

House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting that the President and directing that the Attorney General transmit to the House of Representatives 

all information in their possession relating to specific 

communications regarding detainees and foreign persons 

suspected of terrorism. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests 

2 the President, and directs the Attorney General, to trans3 mit to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 


tjames on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 537 RH 

1 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, cop2 ies of any portions of all documents, records, and commu3 nications in their possession referring or relating to the 

4 notification of rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 

5 436 (1966), by the Department of Justice, including all 

6 component agencies, to foreign persons, captured in Af7 ghanistan, who are suspected of terrorism and detainees 

8 in the custody of the Armed Forces of the United States 

9 in Afghanistan. 


tjames on PRODPC61 with BILLS

tjames on PRODPC61 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 83 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 537 

[Report No. 111–189] 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting that the President and directing that 

terrorism. ing detainees and foreign persons suspected of sion relating to specific communications regardRepresentatives all information in their possesthe Attorney General transmit to the House of 

JUNE 26, 2009 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, 

printed referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be 


tjames on PRODPC61 with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Fortified Holdings
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Repot), I, Brendan Reilly, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), that:

|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                                                                                 
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the
      Quarterly Report.

Date: September 19, 2007

By:/s/ Brendan Reilly       Brandan Reilly 
         Principal Executive Officer

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Equity Trust, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: May 15, 2006                   /s/ Oliver T. Carr, III   Oliver T. Carr, III    President and Chief Executive Officer   Date: May 15, 2006                   /s/ John A. Schissel   John A. Schissel    Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.2







**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of U. S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. (formerly
      known as Barrington Foods International, Inc.); a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Van der Bok Busboom,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.










By:
      /s/  Van der Bok
      Busboom




Name:    Van
      der Bok Busboom





Title:      Chief
      Financial Officer





Date:     
      January 8, 2007





[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to U
      S
      Canadian Minerals Inc .
      and
      will be retained by U
      S
      Canadian Minerals Inc .
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 People’s Bank Short Term Incentive Plan for Key Employees 
 People’s Bank maintains a Short Term Incentive
Plan (the STIP) for certain key employees of the Bank. The STIP is administered under the authority of the Human Resources Committee (HRC) of the Bank’s Board of Directors. 
 Eligibility. All employees who are classified as Grade 45E or higher (generally, Senior Level Managers and above) and who are not participants in any other production or sales incentive plans are eligible to
participate. The Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers of the Bank are participants in the STIP. 
 Target Awards. A target payout
amount is established for each STIP participant on an annual basis. The target amount is expressed as a percentage of the participant’s base salary for the applicable fiscal year. In general, target award percentages increase as seniority
levels increase within the Bank. 
 Key Performance Measures. Between five and seven key performance measures (KPMs) are set for each STIP participant
(other than the Chief Executive Officer) for the applicable fiscal year. Individual KPMs relate to the Bank’s strategic business objectives for that year. 
 Bank Performance Measure. The availability of funds for payment of STIP awards is dependent on the Bank’s attainment of a specified level of performance compared to an objective performance measure (e.g., earnings per share)
over the course of the Bank’s fiscal year. No funds are available for the payment of STIP awards if the Bank’s performance does not meet or exceed a specified minimum performance level. Conversely, the amount available for the payment of
STIP awards is capped once the Bank’s performance exceeds a specified level compared to the objective measure. The performance measure, minimum performance level, and cap level are determined by the HRC on an annual basis. 
 Payouts. STIP payouts are determined following the close of the applicable fiscal year. No payouts are made to any STIP participant unless (a) the Bank has
attained at least the minimum performance level specified for the applicable fiscal year, and (b) the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios meet or exceed their required levels. Assuming these conditions have been met, each participant’s
achievement of his or her KPMs is evaluated and the amount of his or her STIP award payment is calculated. The participant must demonstrate a specified minimum percentage achievement of his or her KPMs, with the amount of the payout dependent on the
degree of achievement attained. The STIP payout for the Chief Executive Officer is solely dependent on the level of Bank performance. Preliminary payout calculations for a participant may then be increased or decreased by as much as 30% (in 10%
increments) after evaluating the participant’s leadership behaviors. 







 Reserved Authority. The HRC and the full Board of Directors of the Bank reserve the authority to approve, modify,
or disallow any payment proposed to be made pursuant to the STIP.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-08-408-CV

JOHN WAYNE JENKINS	APPELLANT	

	V.

KIM LEE JENKINS	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On May 8, 2009, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension.  See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3.  We have not received any response.

	Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM 		

PANEL:  MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MEIER, J.  

DELIVERED:  June 4, 2009