alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA .„ „ ,

k "Line

MAR 2 3 2021

PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF DANIEL M. IFILL FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE

BAR OF MONTANA

Bowen Greenw000

Clerk of Supreme Cou,

O Rtt Montana

Daniel M. IFill has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State

Bar of Montana. IFill was placed on inactive status on September 11, 2020 for failing to

comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending

March 31, 2020. Attached to the Petition is a letter from the State Bar stating that IFill has

now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year. The Petition states that IFill

is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or

omissions sanctionable under the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status.

Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Daniel M. IFiIl for reinstatement to

active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, IFill shall be reinstated.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of Montana.

1 11

DATED this 4---) day of March, 2021.

Chief Justi

03/23/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544
2
RECEIVED IN lUTtfLCnUftT QF COURT OFCRIMfMAt appeals CdlMidAL AflfeALS OF TlXAS MAY 1 B 7niR AUSTIk) •p\v/i5iQid ^belAGOste,Cteifo

Jl&USfijsJO. 

## STATf. OP T^A5, | MPLLLtt: $ COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS ^ ______: MAY 15 2015 -dOmtS-idQiO^A^U^/s^

i».<- (/in o-mi, o^o /lfi<n\ 

## U>S. gH ^W ^23 MTl) j£LA£&JUJbyt-&^ 

# # iP&Qc&aiidG^J)^^ WTtm 13TH COURT,OF APPEALS
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




Pursuant
      to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Aspreva
      Pharmaceuticals Corporation, (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best
      of his knowledge, that:








a.
            The
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
                2006 to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
“Form
                10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andb.
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






Date:
                August 2, 2006
            /s/
                Bruce G. CousinsBruce
                G. CousinsChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. This certification
“accompanies” the Form 10−Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
      SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10−Q),
      irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
      filing.
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 61 6- CV Di ana L a ur a F lor e s RU BIO , Appellant
v . J ose L
. ANDRA DE , Appellee Fr om the 131st J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-CI -13796 Honora ble J ohn D. Gabr iel, J r., Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Justi ce

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Dece mber 10, 2008 DI SMI SSED FOR WANT OF JURI SDI CTI ON Ap pe lla nt ap pe a ls the tr ia l court ’s or de r h old inghe r i n c on te mpt fo r f a ili ngto c omp ly

wi th an orde r of the c ourt. This court does not hav e jurisdiction to reviewcontempt orde rs by direc t appea l. Norman v. Norman , 692 S.W .2d 655, 655 (Tex. 1985). Contempt orders may be re viewed
o n l y b y ana

p p l i c at i o nf

o r a w r i to f h a b e a s c o r p u s , i f th e c o n t e m n o r

h a s b e e nc o n f

i n e d , o r b y a petition f or a writ of mandamus, if the contemnor has not be en confine d. See R osser v. Squier , 902 S.W. 2d 96 2, 96 2 ( Te x. 19 95 ); Ex parte W illiams , 690 S.W .2d 243, 243 (Tex. 1985).04
- 08
- 00 61 6- CV

- 2- W e o rd er ed appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for wa nt of jurisdiction. On November 7, 2008, app el l ant filed a written re sponse. Appellant’ s response, ho we ve r, of

fe rs no ba sis fo r t

his c ourt to ex e rc ise jur isd ic tio n o ve r t his a pp e a l. T he a

pp e a l is there fore dismiss ed for

want of jurisdiction.

PER C URI AM

DO NO T PU B L I SH
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /S/ JONATHAN W. TRUTTER____________________________________Jonathan W. TrutterChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) | Date:   May 10, 2007 |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|

| /S/ RICHARD G. SMITH____________________________________Richard G. SmithSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer) | Date:   May 10, 2007 |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|

----
Exhibit 32.1






Certification
of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002




Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Save the World Air,
Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.






Dated:
      March 30, 2010
            
            By:
            /s/
      CECIL BOND KYTECecil
      Bond KyteChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 30, 2010
            
            By:
            /s/
      EUGENE E. EICHLEREugene
      E. EichlerInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6819

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WINSTON SYLVESTER OLIVER, II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior

District Judge. (3:11-cr-00063-JRS-2; 3:13-cv-00655-JRS)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston Sylvester Oliver, II, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean 

Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Winston Sylvester Oliver, II, seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Oliver has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Andres Medina-Rubio, 

Defendant.

No. CR-17-50195-PHX-DJH

DETENTION ORDER 

 On November 2, 2017, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 2nd day of November, 2017. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32.2

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Yu,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.



/s/ Carol YuCarol Yu, Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 (the “Report”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, IJason Macari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Jason Macari        |                   |
|--------------------------|------------------------|
| Jason  Macari            | November 12, 2009 |
| Chief  Executive Officer |                   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of pSivida Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leonard S. Ross, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 11, 2011



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Leonard S. Ross
|Name:               |  | Leonard S. Ross              
|Title:              |  | Vice President, Finance      
|                    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 244 

Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for the generous 

charitable donations made by Americans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2009 

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for 

the generous charitable donations made by Americans. 

Whereas the level of charitable giving in the United States 

surpassed $300,000,000,000 in 2007; 

Whereas philanthropic giving has accounted for roughly two 

percent of United States Gross Domestic Product since 

the mid-1990s; 

Whereas the percentage of Gross Domestic Product made up 

by charitable donations in the United States more than 

doubles that of any other country; 

Whereas the overwhelming majority of charitable contributions in the United States come from individuals; 

Whereas 65 percent of United States households earning 

$100,000 or less make charitable contributions; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 244 IH 

Whereas roughly 30 percent of United States taxpayers benefit from tax deductions related to charitable giving; and 

Whereas charitable giving tax deductions accounted for $46 

billion in tax savings in fiscal year 2008: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the unparalleled rate of chari3 table giving in the United States and supports this 

4 spirit of generosity; 

5 (2) commends the millions of Americans who 

6 make charitable contributions; 

7 (3) recognizes that philanthropy provides crit8 ical support, especially in times of economic distress, 

9 to organizations that serve individuals and commu10 nities across the United States; and 

11 (4) expresses the sense that tax deductions for 

12 charitable contributions should be protected. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
### NUMBER 13 - 2 0 - 0 0 437 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI
– EDINBURG
IN RE BENCHMARK FILING & SHELVING SYSTEMS, INC.

AND WILLIAM MORRIS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides 1 Relators Benchmark Filing & Shelving Systems, Inc. and William Morris filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above referenced cause throu gh which they contend that the trial court abused its discretion by denying relators’ motions for protective orders

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so ,” but “[w]hen granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case” ); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

and granting a motion to compel discovery in favor of the real party in interest, Susan Lucas. M andamus is both an extraordinary remedy and a discretionary one

. In re Garza , 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). For mandamus to issue, the relator must show that the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists to cure the error

. In re N. Cypress Med. Ctr. Operating Co. , 559 S.W.3d 128, 130 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding); In re Christus Santa Rosa Health Sys. , 492 S.W.3d 276, 279 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding). The relator bears the burden of proving both requir ements. In re H.E.B. Grocery Co. , 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam) ; Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). As it pertains to this case, a discovery order that compels production beyond the rules of procedure is an abuse of discretion for which mandamus is the proper remedy. In re Nat'l Lloyds Ins. Co. , 507 S.W.3d 219, 223 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam) ; In re Deere & Co ., 299 S.W.3d 819, 820 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam ); In re Weekley Homes, L.P. , 295 S.W.3d 309, 322 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding). The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus , the response filed by Lucas, relators’ reply , and the applicable law, is of the opinion tha t the relator s ha ve not met their burden to obtain relief. See Hall v. Lawlis , 907 S.W.2d 493, 494

– 95 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam) ; Maresca v. Marks , 362 S.W.2d 299, 301 (Tex. 1962) (orig. proceeding); El Centro del Barrio, Inc. v. Barlow , 894 S.W.2d 775, 779

– 80 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1994, orig. proceeding ); see also In re Vaughan , No. 13

- 18

- 00541

- CV, 2019 WL 962381, at *4 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi

– E dinburg Feb. 27,3

2019, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus

.

GINA M. BENAVIDES Jus tice

D elivered and filed on the 21s t day of January, 2021

.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12168]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Outer Continental Shelf, Alaska Region, Beaufort Sea Lease Sale 
144

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the final environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Minerals Management Service (MMS) has prepared a final 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) relating to the proposed 1996 
Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sale of available unleased 
blocks in the Beaufort Sea. The proposed Beaufort Sea Sale 144 will 
offer for lease approximately 9.8 million acres. Single copies of the 
final EIS can be obtained from the Regional Director, Minerals 
Management Service, Alaska Region, 949 East 36th Avenue, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99503-4302, Attention: Public Information. Copies can be 
requested by telephone, (907) 271-6070.
    Copies of the final EIS will also be available for inspection in 
the following public libraries:

Alaska Resource Library, U.S. Department of the Interior, Anchorage, AK
Alaska State Library, Juneau, AK
Army Corps of Engineers Library, U.S. Department of Defense, Anchorage, 
AK
Elmer E. Rasmuson Library, 310 Tanana Drive, Fairbanks, AK
Fairbanks North Star Borough Public Library (Noel Wien Library), 1215 
Cowles Street, Fairbanks, AK
George Francis Memorial Library, Kotzebue, AK
Kaveolook School Library, Kaktovik, AK
Kegoayah Kozga Public Library, Nome, AK
Nellie Weyiouanna Ilisaavik Library, Shishmaref, AK
North Slope Borough School District Library/Media Center, Barrow, AK
Northern Alaska Environmental Center Library, 218 Driveway, Fairbanks, 
AK
Nuiqsut Library, Nuiqsut, AK
Tikigaq Library, Point Hope, AK
University of Alaska, Anchorage Consortium Library, 3211 Providence 
Dr., Anchorage, AK
University of Alaska, Fairbanks Institute of Arctic Biology, 311 Irving 
Bldg., Fairbanks, AK
University of Alaska-Juneau Library, 11120 Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK.

    Dated: April 19, 1996.
Thomas Gernhofer,
Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 96-12168 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11058]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 137-002-CA]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice Granting Extension of 
Time

April 29, 1996.
    On March 1, 1996, the Notice of Application Ready for Environmental 
Analysis (NREA) for the Mokelumne River Project No. 137 was issued in 
the Federal Register (Vol. 61 No. 42 FR 8055). The NREA solicited all 
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions 
concerning this project be filed with the Commission by April 23, 1996. 
All reply comments must be filed with the Commission by June 7, 1996.
    In a letter filed on April 22, 1996, the U.S. Department of the 
Interior (Interior) requests a 30 day extension of time to comment on 
the NREA. Interior said that it needs more time to evaluate the 
adequacy of instream flows and the proposed fish protection facilities. 
Because there is an extensive amount of information to evaluate 
associated with the Mokelumne Project, the Commission is extending the 
date to file comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and 
prescriptions until May 23, 1996. The date to file reply comments with 
the Commission is extended until July 8, 1996.
    If you have any questions about this matter, please call Tom Dean 
at (202) 219-2778.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11058 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M