alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 2 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 3 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 4 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 5 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 6 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 7 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 8 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 9 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 10 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 11 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 12 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 13 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 14 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 15 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 16 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 17 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 18 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 19 of 20
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 20 of 20
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 499 

Congratulating the University of St. Thomas Tommies baseball team for 

winning the 2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III 

Men’s Baseball National Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2009 

Ms. MCCOLLUM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of St. Thomas Tommies baseball team for winning the 2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III Men’s Baseball National 

Championship. 

Whereas the University of St. Thomas Tommies of St. Paul, 

Minnesota, defeated the College of Wooster Fighting 

Scots of Wooster, Ohio, 3 to 2, on May 26, 2009, to become the 2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association 

(NCAA) Division III Men’s Baseball National Champions; 

Whereas this win marks the second national title for the University of St. Thomas in baseball, the first was in 2001; 

Whereas this baseball title is the University of St. Thomas’s 

13th national team championship; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 499 IH 

Whereas the University of St. Thomas men’s baseball team 

finished the 2008–2009 season with a record of 41–13; 

Whereas the University of St. Thomas became the third team 

in the 34 years of Division III baseball championships to 

win six NCAA playoff elimination games; 

Whereas Head Coach Dennis Denning has led the men’s 

baseball team to four NCAA Division III College World 

Series and was named the ABCA/Rawlings Division III 

National Coach of the Year in 2001; 

Whereas Matt Olson, a junior out fielder from Anoka, was 

voted the College World Series’ Most Outstanding Player; 

Whereas pitcher Matt Schuld, a junior from Plymouth, is one 

of only four Division III players named both All-American and Academic All-American for 2009; and 

Whereas the University of St. Thomas was founded in 1885 

and serves just under 11,000 undergraduate and graduate students making it Minnesota’s largest independent 

college or university: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the University of St. Thomas 

3 baseball team for winning the 2009 National Colle4 giate Athletic Association Division III Men’s Base5 ball National Championship; 

6 (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

7 coaches, students, and staff whose hard work and 

8 dedication helped the University of St. Thomas win 

9 the championship; and 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 499 IH 

1 (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent2 atives to transmit a copy of this resolution to the 

3 University of St. Thomas President Father Dennis 

4 Dease, Baseball Coach Dennis Denning, and Ath5 letic Director Steve Fritz for appropriate display. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
November 15, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HOUSTON UNLIMITED, I NC. METAL PROCESSIN G , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01006

- CV V.

MEL ACRES RANCH , Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal f

rom the judgment in favor of appellee, Mel Acres Ranch, signed July 15, 2010 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Houston Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing, to pay all costs in this appeal. We further order the decision certified below for observance.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Presidential Documents 26029

Presidential Determination No. 96–23 of April 30, 1996

Suspending Prohibitions on Certain Sales and Leases Under

the Anti-Economic Discrimination Act of 1994

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by Section 564 of the Foreign Relations

Authorization Act (‘‘the Act’’), Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, Public Law

103–236, as amended, I hereby:

(1) determine and certify that the following countries do not currently maintain a policy or practice of sending letters to United States firms requesting

compliance with, or soliciting information regarding compliance with, the

Arab League secondary or tertiary boycott of Israel:

Jordan and Mauritania;

(2) determine that extension of suspension of the application of Section

564(a) of the Act to the following countries until May 1, 1997, will promote

the objectives of Section 564:

Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia,

and the United Arab Emirates.

You are authorized and directed to report this determination to the appropriate committees of the Congress and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, April 30, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–12939

Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

Billing Code 4710–10–M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7317

CARLOS WOODS, 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:12-cv-01260-WDQ) 

Submitted: January 24, 2013 Decided: March 7, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carlos Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Carlos Woods seeks to appeal the district court’s 

August 1, 2012 order denying without prejudice his self-styled 

“Motion for [T]ranscript of Post Conviction [H]earing” and 

denying his self-styled “Motion Requesting Judge Change.” Woods 

filed his notice of appeal prior to the entry on December 3, 

2012, of final judgment in the district court. 

We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-47 (1949). When a notice of appeal is premature, the 

jurisdictional defect can be cured if the district court enters 

a final judgment prior to our consideration of the appeal under 

the doctrine of cumulative finality. Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. 

Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992). 

Not all premature notices of appeal, however, are subject to the 

cumulative finality rule. Instead, this doctrine applies only 

if the appellant appeals from an order the district court could 

have certified for immediate appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). 

In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 287-89 (4th Cir. 2005). Appeals 

from “clearly interlocutory decision[s]” cannot be saved under 

cumulative finality. Id. at 288 (internal quotation marks 

omitted). 
3

The August 1 order is not a final order of the 

district court and is not appealable under the collateral order 

exception to the final judgment rule. The order also is not one 

of the orders subject to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292. 

Further, because the district court could not have certified the 

order for immediate appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), the 

cumulative finality rule cannot apply. Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 237 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 237

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 12, 2009.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be and is hereby elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
            (1) Committee on foreign affairs.--Ms. Woolsey (to rank immediately 
        after Mr. Gene Green of Texas).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 389 

Encouraging energy efficient and environment-friendly building and facility 

certification programs to incorporate the use of mechanical insulation 

as part of their standards and ratings system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2009 

Mrs. HALVORSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging energy efficient and environment-friendly building and facility certification programs to incorporate the 

use of mechanical insulation as part of their standards 

and ratings system. 

Whereas mechanical insulation is defined to encompass all 

thermal, acoustical, and personnel safety requirements in 

mechanical piping and equipment, hot and cold applications, and Heating, Venting & Air Conditioning (HVAC) 

applications which can be used in a variety of buildings 

such as manufacturing facilities, power plants, refineries, 

hospitals, universities, government buildings, and other 

facilities; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 389 IH 

Whereas buildings are responsible for 40 percent of United 

States energy demand and 40 percent of all greenhouse 

gas emissions; 

Whereas methodically and properly installed mechanical insulation provides long-term energy efficiency, emission reduction, cost savings, and safety benefits, and can be 

used to reduce the number of tons of greenhouse gas 

emissions that could be prevented from release into the 

atmosphere, prevent loss of energy, control condensation, 

depending on the thickness of the insulation, protect occupant safety and public health wellness, and regulate 

surface temperature; 

Whereas combined, buildings used in commercial and industrial sectors consume 2.5 times more energy than residential buildings, according to Annual Energy Outlook 

provided by the Energy Information Administration in 

December 2008; 

Whereas loss of energy can increase the temperature within 

a facility or area, putting additional stress on other 

equipment and building infrastructure and reducing that 

equipment’s performance and life expectancy; and 

Whereas according to the National Insulation Association, 

maintenance of mechanical insulation at industrial facilities alone can generate more than $3,600,000,000 in energy savings per year, reduce 37,000,000 metric tons of 

carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emission, and 

create more than 27,000 jobs annually: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages energy efficient and environment-friendly building 

3 and facility certification programs to incorporate the use 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 389 IH 

1 of mechanical insulation as part of their standards and 

2 ratings system. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 11, 2020

NO. 03-19-00547-CR

Marcos Landin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgments. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24350-24351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12099]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1995 Rev., Supp. No. 13]

Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: The Connecticut 
Surety Company
    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal Bonds 
is hereby issued to the following company under Sections 9304 to 9308, 
Title 31, of the United States Code. Federal bond-approving officers 
should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 
1995 Revision, on page 34439 to reflect this addition:
    The Connecticut Surety Company. BUSINESS ADDRESS: City Place II, 
185 Asylum Street, Hartford, CT 06103-3403. PHONE: (860) 527-7806. 
UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $942,000. SURETY LICENSES c/: AR, CA, CT, 
DE, DC, LA, NE, NY, ND, OH, PA, SC, TX. INCORPORATED IN: Connecticut.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet
(http://www.ustreas.gov/treasury/bureaus/finman/c570.html) or through 
our computerized public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at 
(202) 874-6817/6872/6953/7034/8608. A hard copy may be purchased from 
the

[[Page 24351]]

Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-
0132. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock 
number: 048-000-00489-0.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F04, Hyattsville, MD 20782, telephone (202) 874-6765.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc 96-12099 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1330]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board


Availability of Environmental Assessments

    Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332, the Surface Transportation Board has 
prepared and made available environmental assessments for the 
proceedings listed below. Dates environmental assessments are available 
are listed below for each individual proceeding.
    To obtain copies of these environmental assessments contact Ms. 
Victoria Rutson or Ms. Judith Groves, Surface Transportation Board, 
Section of Environmental Analysis, Room 3219, Washington, DC 20423, 
(202) 927-6211 or (202) 927-6246. Comments on the following assessment 
are due 15 days after the date of availability:
    AB-No. 450 (Sub-No. 1X), Ogeechee Railway Company--Discontinuance 
of Service Exemption--In Bleckley and Pulaski Counties, Georgia. EA 
available 1/19/96.
    AB-No. 290 (Sub-No. 141X), Norfolk Southern Railway Company--
Abandonment Exemption--In Bleckley and Pulaski Counties, Georgia. EA 
available 1/19/96.
    AB-No. 464X, Piedmont and Atlantic Railroad Co., Inc. d/b/a Yadkin 
Valley Railroad Company--Discontinuance of Operations. EA available 1/
17/96.
    AB-No. 290 (Sub-No. 174X), Norfolk Southern Railway Company--
Abandonment between Rural Hall and Brook Cove, North Carolina. EA 
available 1/17/96.
    AB-No. 290 (Sub-No. 179X), Norfolk and Western Railway Company--
Abandonment--At Lynchburg, Virginia. EA available 1/17/96.
    AB-No. 55 (Sub-No 520X), CSX Transportation, Inc.--Abandonment in 
Chatham County, Georgia. EA available 1/23/96. Comments on the 
following assessment are due 30 days after the date of availability:
    AB-No. 462 (Sub-No 1X), Southeastern International Corporation--
Abandonment Exemption--In Chambers and Jefferson Counties, Texas. EA 
available 1/12/96.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1330 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### Loren McGUIRE, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Continental Casualty Company, and Treasurer of Missouri as custodian of Second Injury Fund, Respondents.

No. WD 48391.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 8, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied June 21, 1994.

Russell C. Still, Columbia, for appellant,

Roland P. Walker, Columbia, for respondents,

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Loren McGuire appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s final award finding him 40 percent permanently disabled and denying his claim for permanent, total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. We affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 306 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 306

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         April 1, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1664) to amend the executive compensation provisions of the Emergency 
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to prohibit unreasonable and excessive 
compensation and compensation not based on performance standards. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Financial Services. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Financial Services now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those 
arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no 
amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in 
order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in 
the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 
rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[letterhead]

                                                         8250 Jones Branch Drive
                                                     McLean, Virginia 22102-3110

Freddie Mac


July 17, 1996


Mr. Daniel Silverman
Executive Vice President
Community Home Mortgage Corporation
45 Executive Drive
Plainview, NJ 11803



Dear Mr. Silverman:

This is to confirm that you are an approved  Freddie Mac  Seller/Servicer.  Your
Seller Service number 937903.

Sincerely,

/s/ Rachael H. Haynes

Rachael H. Haynes
Account Manager
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11699]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM96-3-119-000]


Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd.; Notice of Filing

May 6, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1996, Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd. 
(Young) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, with a proposed effective 
date of June 1, 1996:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 5

    Young states that the purpose of its filing is to reflect an 
increase in the fuel reimbursement percentage based on actual 
experience and a two estimate from 2.0% to 2.6% effective June 1, 1996.
    Young states that copies of this filing have been served on Young's 
jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Sections 385.214 and 385.211). 
All such petitions or protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11699 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M