alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC,the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 14, 2008                        |             |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                            |             |   |
|                                            |             |   |
| By                                              | /s/  PAUL MORTON |   |
| Paul  Morton                                    |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |

 

1

----
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. § 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Kandi Technologies, Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hu Xiaoming, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Zhu Xiaoying, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Hu XiaomingHu XiaomingPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Zhu XiaoyingZhu XiaoyingChief Financial Officer




July 29, 2011
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofNothing Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008

of WorldSpace, Inc.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of WorldSpace, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ SRIDHAR GANESAN                             
|                      |  | Sridhar Ganesan                                 
|                      |  | Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.



38
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135121 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135121 

 COA: 269299 

Genesee CC: 05-017032-FC 

BOBBY JAMAR YOUNGER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

 Clerk
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T NOVEMB ER 16, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 1 2 6 1 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 8

- 8 0 0 6 2

- C R

- D T K H

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

C A S S A N D R A L A S T E R ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( N o v e m b e r 1 6 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , E D M O N D S O N a n d F A Y , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

D a v i d J

. J o f

f e , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f

o r C a s s a n d r a L a s t e r i n t h i s d i r e c t c r i m i n a la p p e a l , h a s m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e a p p e l l a n t a n d

f i l e d a b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8

L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e
i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t ,

c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d L a s t e r ’ s c o n v i c t i o n s a n d

s e n t e n c e s a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors
Crown Media Holdings, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-37588) on Form S-8 of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. of our
report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on
Form 10-K of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150,Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, effective July 1, 2003.

Denver,
Colorado
March 12, 2004

---

QuickLinks
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 26 2000 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
JAMES CRAIG LITTERAL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. JOE WILLIAMS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Respondents-Appellees. No. 98-2270 (D.C. No. CIV-97-546-SC/RLP)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before EBEL , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Plaintiff James Craig Litteral seeks a certificate of appealability in order to pursue this appeal from an order of the district co urt denying his petition for habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Because Litteral has failed to make “a substantial showing of the denial of a c onstitutional right,” as required under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), we deny his request and dismiss the appeal. In 1988, Litteral was convicted in New Mexico state court of first degree murder with a firearm enhancement. See State v. Litteral , 793 P.2d 268, 269-70 (N.M. 1990). He was sentenced to life in prison with a one yea r concurrent sentence on the firearm enhancement. See id. at 270. In his petition, Litteral contended that he had bee n subjected to double jeopardy when the trial court declared a mistrial o ver his objection where no manifest necessity existed. He asserted he was den ied a fair trial because evidence concerning his involvement with drugs and weapons was admitted and because his cross-examination of the state’s witnes s was limited. Litteral alleged that his motion for a new trial based on newly disc overed evidence should have been granted and that he received ineffective assis tance of counsel at trial. The district court held that no constitutional viol ations cognizable in a habeas proceeding had been stated. The court dismi ssed the case with prejudice. On appeal, Litteral argues that the district court erred in its ruling.-3-

We have reviewed the district court’s judgment in l ight of Litteral’s submissions to this court and the record on appeal. We agree that Litteral failed to establish that the state court decision “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Fe deral law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” 28 U.S.C. § 22 54(d)(1), or “was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in lightof the evidence presented in the State court proceeding,” id. § 2254(d)(2). We DENY Litteral’s request for a certificate of app ealability and DISMISS this appeal. We GRANT his motion for in forma paup eris status.

Entered for the Court

David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
<Page>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Moldflow Scandinavia (Sweden)
Moldflow International Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
Moldflow Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
Moldflow Italia s.r.l. (Italy)
Moldflow Korea Limited (Korea)
Moldflow (Europe) Ltd. (United Kingdom)
Moldflow Vertriebs GmbH (Germany)
Moldflow Japan KK (Japan)
Moldflow Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
Moldflow France (France)
Moldflow BV (Netherlands)
Moldflow Taiwan, Inc. (Taiwan)
Moldflow Ireland, Ltd. (Ireland)
Moldflow Iberia sl (Spain)
Advanced CAE Technology, Inc. (New York)
Branden Technologies, Inc. (Oregon)
Moldflow Merger Corp. (Delaware)
Moldflow (Guangzhou)  Ltd. (China)
Moldflow Mauritius Pty. Ltd. (Mauritius)
Moldflow Securities Corp. (Massachusetts)
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Venoco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ TIMOTHY M. MARQUEZ Timothy M. Marquez Chief Executive Officer and ChairmanNovember 1, 2010/s/ TIMOTHY A. FICKER Timothy A. Ficker Chief Financial OfficerNovember 1, 2010


---



QuickLinks
----

----

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Uniontown Energy Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Uniontown Energy Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  September 19, 2011 |   |                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |                                                                                                            |
|                                 |   |                                                                                                            |
|                                 |   | /s/ Terry Fields                                                                                                |   |   |
|                                 |   | Terry Fields                                                                                                    |
|                                 |   | Chief Financial, Officer, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                                 |   | UNIONTOWN ENERGY INC.                                                                                           |
|                                 |   |                                                                                                            |

----

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00882-CR

Darius DUKES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-12-040

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

SIGNED October 21, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12456]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board \1\
[STB Finance Docket No. 32907]


Ormet Railroad Corporation; Acquisition and Operation Exemption; 
Consolidated Rail Corporation

    Ormet Railroad Corporation of Wheeling, WV (ORC), a noncarrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire 
from Consolidated Rail Corporation's Omal Secondary Track from milepost 
60.5 at Powhatten Point, to the end of the line, milepost 72.7 at Omal, 
a distance of 12.2 miles in Monroe County, OH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 
Stat. 803, which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and took effect 
on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and 
transferred certain functions to the Surface Transportation Board 
(Board). This notice relates to functions that are subject to Board 
jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10901.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ORC will assume the common carrier obligation associated with the 
line, holding itself out to render common carrier service by railroad. 
Consolidated Rail Corporation will perform the operations on the line, 
solely pursuant to a private contractual arrangement, on behalf of and 
for the account of ORC.
    Consummation was to be on or after April 30, 1996. If the verified 
notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void 
ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to reopen will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 32907, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of each pleading 
must be served on Fritz R. Kahn, Esq., Suite 750 West, 1100 New York 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20005-3934.

    Decided: May 10, 1996.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12456 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.22


[TRAVELOCITY LOGO]

January 20,2000

James Marsicano
EVP, Sales and Service

Dear Jim:

As you know, on October 4, 1999 Preview and Travelocity announced plans to
merge. We anticipate the merger will close in the near future.

We are very pleased to inform you that, upon close, your base compensation will
be increased to $19,121.92 per month. You will also be eligible to participate
in our incentive award, which will pay awards based on the Company meeting
pre-determined financial objectives. Your 2000 target incentive award will be
40% of your annualized base salary. Your individual award will depend upon both
actual Company performance and your individual performance. The bonus plan, of
course, must be officially approved by our Board of Directors. We will provide
more details when we receive that approval.

As a Travelocity employee, you will also be eligible for the Company's benefit
programs including medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance, and
paid time off. An information sheet that outlines the benefit plans and
structure accompanies this letter. Please note that the details and limitations
of all benefit and compensation programs are subject to the Company's policies
and plans and may change from time to time in the Company's sole discretion.

Subject to the terms of an agreement with American Airlines, Inc. that expires
on June 30, 2008, you will continue to be eligible for personal flight
privileges for you, your spouse and dependent children on American Airlines and
American Eagle. Certain space available flight privileges will also be available
for non-dependent children, other relatives, and friends on these airlines. As
you know, the pending spin of Sabre from AMR has resulted in certain changes in
flight privileges, primarily relating to individual taxation. Please see
http://source.sabre.com.

Finally, we feel that it is important that you have an ownership stake in the
Company. Therefore, our Board of Directors has approved our proposal to provide
to you, at close, an option to purchase 33,000 shares of Travelocity.com stock.
This grant is in addition to the grant you received on October 4th, 1999. The
grant price per option will be calculated on or about the close of the merger.
The terms and conditions will be governed by the Company's Long-Term Incentive
Plan and individual stock agreements.

We hope you are excited about the great things Travelocity has to offer to all
of us. I look forward to working with you and I know with your help we will be
the world's #1 on-line travel company for a long time to come.

Sincerely,


/s/ Terrell B. Jones
Terrell B. Jones
President & CEO
Order filed January 14, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00778-CV

____________

TAMMY DEWOLF, CHRISTINA DEWOLF, AMANDA DEWOLF AND 

KAITLYN DEWOLF, Appellants

V.

RICHIE KOHLER, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-46416

O R D E R

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due November 22, 2013, but it has not 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On December 11, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the 

court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within 

fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and 
2

provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant 

has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or otherwise 

responded to this court’s notice. 

Appellants are ordered to file the clerk’s record in this appeal or before 

January 28, 2014, or the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM