alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00239

- CV

D R

. J OHN S ZABUNIEWICZ , Appellant

V

.

K ING I NVESTMENTS , I NC ., P HILLIP K ING , AS E XECUTOR OF THE E STATE
OF THE E ARL K ING , D ECEASED AND P HILLIP S. K ING , Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 342nd District Court

of Tarrant County ( 342

- 329405

- 21 )
September 14, 2023
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the
appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of
jurisdictio n

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Richard Roland Draper, Jr., 

Defendant.

No. CR-17-8278-PCT-DJH

DETENTION ORDER 

 On December 29, 2017, defendant, Richard Roland Draper, Jr., appeared before 

this Court on a petition to revoke conditions of release and submitted the issue to the 

Court. The Court considered the information provided to the Court in determining 

whether the defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant has violated 

the conditions of release and that there is no condition or combination of conditions 

available to the Court. 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 29th day of December, 2017.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Graham G. Alexander, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Rancho Santa Monica Developments Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2005, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/ Graham G. Alexander          
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | GRAHAM
      G. ALEXANDER        
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | October 24, 2005                 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22073-22074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11801]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant To The Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 C.F.R. Sec. 50.7, notice 
is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Young Refining Company, Civil Action No. 1-96-CV-1002-JEC, was lodged 
on April 25, 1996, with the United States District Court for the 
Northern District of Georgia. The consent decree settles a claim 
brought under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental

[[Page 22074]]

Response, Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 
9607(a), for response costs incurred by the United States at the Basket 
Creek Drum Disposal site (the ``Basket Creek site'') in Douglasville, 
Georgia. Under the proposed consent decree, Young Refining will pay 
$51,000 to the United States in reimbursement of response costs 
incurred by the Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') in connection 
with the Basket Creek site. Although the actual removal of hazardous 
substances from the Basket Creek Site was conducted by Chem-Nuclear 
Systems, Inc., EPA has incurred costs in excess of $475,000 in 
connection with the Basket Creek Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Young Refining Company, DOJ Ref. # 90-11-2-755.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, Richard Russell Federal Building, Suite 1800, 
75 Spring Street, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30335; the Region 4 Office of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, 345 Courtland Ave., N.E., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30307; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 
4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case 
and enclose a check in the amount of $4.25 (25 cents per page 
reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 96-11801 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
NOTE: 

### This order is nonprecedential.



# Iltuteb 4 1)tate5 Court of awe& for tbe feberat Circuit DOUGLAS S. MARSHALL, 

## Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,



## Respondent. 2010-3128 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. NY0353100042-I-1.

ON MOTION ORDER 

### Douglas S. Marshall moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon consideration thereof, I T 

### Is ORDERED THAT: 

### The motion granted.MARSHALL v. USPS 2 FOR THE COURT JUL 2 7 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Douglas S. Marshall Elizabeth A. Speck, Esq. s20 FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 

## 2 7 2010 JAN HORBALY CLERK
EXHIBIT 28

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-30 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-30 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-30 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 3
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 20-0607V 

UNPUBLISHED 

MARSULLY GONZALEZ, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: August 5, 2021 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) 

   

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for Petitioner. 

Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

 On May 15, 2020, Marsully Gonzalez filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered an on-Table shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received 

on January 29, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters. 

On August 4, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes 

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, Respondent states that Petitioner “had no history of pain, inflammation, or 

dysfunction in her left shoulder; her pain occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012). 
2

intramuscular vaccination; her pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the 

shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality 

was identified to explain her symptoms.” Id. at 6-7. Respondent further agrees that the 

six month sequela requirement has been satisfied. Id. at 7. 

 In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Brian H. Corcoran 

 Brian H. Corcoran 

 Chief Special Master
#### Michael PARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48774.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 30, 1994.

*351Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The denial of post-conviction relief is af-finned. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 47

    Supporting the goals and ideals of Peace Officers Memorial Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2009

Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself, Mr. Costa, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Reyes, Mr. 
 Burton of Indiana, Mr. Holden, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Latta, 
Mr. Mack, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Walden, 
    and Mr. Gallegly) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals and ideals of Peace Officers Memorial Day.

Whereas there are more than 900,000 sworn law enforcement officers now serving 
        in the United States;
Whereas law enforcement officers selflessly protect the people of the United 
        States and communities throughout the country from harm;
Whereas law enforcement officers serve the country regardless of the peril to 
        themselves;
Whereas more than 18,340 law enforcement officers have been killed in the line 
        of duty since the first recorded police death in 1792;
Whereas September 11, 2001, was the deadliest day in law enforcement history 
        with 72 officers killed while responding to the terrorist attacks;
Whereas 140 law enforcement officers were killed in 2008;
Whereas Public Law 87-726 designates May 15th of each year as Peace Officers 
        Memorial Day, and Police Week is commemorated during the calendar week 
        containing May 15;
Whereas section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, requires that the United 
        States flag on all government buildings be displayed at half-staff on 
        May 15, Peace Officers Memorial Day; and
Whereas law enforcement officers deserve the gratitude of the people of the 
        United States for their service: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Peace Officers 
        Memorial Day to honor Federal, State, and local peace officers 
        killed or disabled in the line of duty; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        such a day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Lindamood Demolition, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00981

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 76550

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

On November 24, 2015, relator, Lindamood Demolition, Inc., filed a petition for writ of

mandamus challenging the trial court’s November 17, 2015 “Order Compelling Forensic

Examination of Lindamood Demolition, Inc.’s Electronic Data.” In conjunction with it s petition,

relator filed a motion requesting a temporary stay of the trial court’s order pending this Court’s

resolution of the petition.

The Court requests that the real parties in interest file their responses, if any, to the

emergency stay motion by n o later than 3pm

, (C entral) on Wednesday, November 25, 2015

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: November 24, 2015
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00289-CR

TAYMOR TRAVON MCINTYRE,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District 

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1511547D)

January 28, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments of the 

trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Teda Travel Incorporated Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Godfrey Chin Tong Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Teda Travel Incorporated and will be retained by Teda Travel Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Godfrey Chin Tong Hui



Godfrey Chin Tong Hui

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 423 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 423

Expressing support for a national day of remembrance for the workers of 
           the nuclear weapons program of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2009

Mr. Wamp submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for a national day of remembrance for the workers of 
           the nuclear weapons program of the United States.

Whereas hundreds of thousands of men and women have served the United States in 
        building its nuclear defense since World War II;
Whereas these dedicated American workers paid a high price for their service and 
        many have developed disabling or fatal illnesses as a result of exposure 
        to beryllium, ionizing radiation, toxic substances, and other hazards 
        that are unique to the production and testing of nuclear weapons;
Whereas these workers were unintentionally put at individual risk without their 
        knowledge and consent in order to develop a nuclear weapons program for 
        the benefit of all American citizens;
Whereas these patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for their 
        contribution, service, and sacrifice towards the defense of our great 
        Nation; and
Whereas October 30, 2009, is the ninth anniversary of the enactment of the 
        Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act (title XXXVI of 
        Public Law 106-398; 42 U.S.C. 7384 note): Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a day of remembrance 
        for the workers of the nuclear weapons program of the United 
        States, including uranium miners, millers, and haulers; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to recognize 
        such a day of remembrance as an opportunity to support and 
        participate in appropriate ceremonies, programs, and other 
        activities in honor of the past and present workers of the 
        nuclear weapons program of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12291]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00739]


Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee Brewery, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; 
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for 
Reconsideration

    By letter of March 28, 1996, the petitioners, Brewery Workers Local 
9, UAW (Amalgamated) AFL-CIO, requested administrative reconsideration 
of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment Assistance for 
workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on February 
27, 1996, and published in the Federal Register on March 19, 1996 (61 
FR 11225).
    The petitioner presents evidence that the Department's analysis of 
U.S. imports of beer was incomplete.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 29th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-12291 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

              LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE A-T2

                                IFCO Systems N.V.

                          Rivierstaete, Amsteldijk 166

                       1079 LH Amsterdam, The Netherlands

July 1, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549 - 0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

IFCO Systems N.V. ("IFCO") has received a representation letter from Arthur
Andersen Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH
("Andersen"), IFCO's independent public accountants, in connection with the
issuance of Andersen's audit report incorporated by reference in IFCO's Annual
Report on this Form 20-F. In its letter, Andersen has represented to IFCO that
its audit of the consolidated financial statements of IFCO referenced in its
audit report was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, and that
there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit,
availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             IFCO Systems N.V.


                                             By: /s/ Michael W. Nimtsch
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Michael W. Nimtsch
                                                 Senior Executive Vice President
                                                 and Chief Financial Officer