alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25646-25647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12821]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Office of Environmental Management; Environmental Management Site 
Specific Advisory Board; Renewal

    Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463), and in accordance with title 41 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations, section 101-6.1015(a), and following consultation 
with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services 
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Environmental 
Management Site Specific Advisory Board has been renewed for a two-year 
period beginning May 16, 1996.
    The purpose of the Board is to provide the Assistant Secretary for 
Environmental Management with advice and recommendations on 
environmental management projects and issues such as risk management, 
economic development, future land use, and budget prioritization 
activities, from the perspectives of affected groups and State and 
local governments. Board membership will reflect the full diversity of 
views in the affected community and region and be composed primarily of 
people who are directly affected by site clean-up activities. Members 
will include interested stakeholders from local governments, Indian 
Tribes, environmental and civic groups, labor organizations, 
universities, waste management and environmental restoration firms, and 
other interested parties. Representatives from the Department of Energy 
(DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency, and State governments will 
be ex-officio members of the Board. Selection and appointment of Board 
members will be accomplished using procedures designed to ensure 
diverse membership and a balance of viewpoints. Consensus 
recommendations to the DOE from the Board on the resolution of numerous 
difficult issues will help achieve DOE's objective of an integrated 
environmental management program.
    The Secretary of Energy has determined that renewal of the 
Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board is necessary to 
conduct the DOE's business and is in the public interest. The Board 
will operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, the DOE Organization Act (Public Law 95-91), and rules 
and regulations issued in implementation of those Acts.
    Further information regarding this advisory board may be obtained 
from

[[Page 25647]]

Rachel Murphy Samuel at (202) 586-3279.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 16, 1996.
JoAnne Whitman,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-12821 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy O
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:  November 21, 2006

   /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
 Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry

Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6374

KEITH RENARD HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cv-00469-CMH)

Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 9, 2006

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Renard Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Keith Renard Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 85TH DISTRICT COURT of BRAZOS COUNTY, GREET INGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 12th day of February, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JESSE TIRADO LOPEZ, Ap pellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 13

- 00080

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 12

- 01541

- CRF

- 85)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 12, 2015.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 22nd day of July, 2015.

Cecile Foy Gsanger, CLERK
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2022

No. 04-22-00072-CV

JMI CONTRACTORS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Jose Manuel MEDELLIN,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-05983

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on August 30, 2022, and on August 25, 2022, appellant filed a 

motion requesting an extension until September 29, 2022 to file his brief. On August 30, 2022, 

however, appellant filed his brief. Accordingly, appellant’s motion requesting an extension is 

moot.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KYLE REED,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 421 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of February, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                         330 E. Warm Springs
                                         Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                702.257.1984
                                            702.362.0540 fax





March 27, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

The  firm  of  G.  Brad  Beckstead,  CPA,  consents  to  the
inclusion  of my report of March 27, 2002, on the  Financial
Statements  of  Nothing Corp.  for  the
years  ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, in its Form  10K-SB
filing  to  be  filed  with the US Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.

Signed,


/s/ Brad Beckstead

G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
**EXHIBIT32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Michael L. Pungello, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 14, 2006                        |
|----------------------------------------------|
|                                         |   |
| By                                           | /s/ MICHAEL L.  PUNGELLO |   |
| Michael L. Pungello                          |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |  |  |  |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Regis
      Kwong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB of Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of Jingwei
      International Limited.




I,
      James
      Mu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Jingwei
      International Limited for
      the
      quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Jingwei
      International Limited.


By:
                /s/
                  Regis KwongRegis
                        Kwong
                      Chief
                        Executive Officer
                      (Principal
                        Executive
                        Officer)


By:
                  /s/
                    James MuJames
                          Mu
                        Chief
                          Financial Officer
                        (Principal
                          Financial and Accounting
                          Officer)
  August
        14
        , 2007
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ROBIN JEAN HARRIS, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1943

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH

- 1221

- 22

- 0150

- W

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is Case: 24-1943 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2024H ARRIS V

. DVA 2

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

July 5, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 5, 2024 Case: 24-1943 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 07/05/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 31 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 31

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 26, 2009.
Whereas the Internet and the capabilities of modern technology cause data 
        privacy issues to figure prominently in the lives of many people in the 
        United States at work, in their interaction with government and public 
        authorities, in the health field, in e-commerce transactions, and online 
        generally;
Whereas many individuals are unaware of data protection and privacy laws 
        generally and of specific steps that can be taken to help protect the 
        privacy of personal information online;
Whereas ``National Data Privacy Day'' constitutes an international collaboration 
        and a nationwide and statewide effort to raise awareness about data 
        privacy and the protection of personal information on the Internet;
Whereas government officials from the United States and Europe, privacy 
        professionals, academics, legal scholars, representatives of 
        international businesses, and others with an interest in data privacy 
        issues are working together on this date to further the discussion about 
        data privacy and protection;
Whereas privacy professionals and educators are being encouraged to take the 
        time to discuss data privacy and protection issues with teens in high 
        schools across the country;
Whereas the recognition of ``National Data Privacy Day'' will encourage more 
        people nationwide to be aware of data privacy concerns and to take steps 
        to protect their personal information online; and
Whereas January 28, 2009, would be an appropriate day to designate as ``National 
        Data Privacy Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of a ``National Data Privacy Day'';
            (2) encourages State and local governments to observe the day with 
        appropriate activities that promote awareness of data privacy;
            (3) encourages privacy professionals and educators to discuss data 
        privacy and protection issues with teens in high schools across the 
        United States; and
            (4) encourages individuals across the Nation to be aware of data 
        privacy concerns and to take steps to protect their personal information 
        online.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12440]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,472A]


Exxon Company, U.S.A., a/k/a Exxon Corporation, Houston/Corpus 
Christi Production Division, Including the Marketing Division, Houston, 
TX; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
December 15, 1994, applicable to all workers of Exxon Company, U.S.A., 
Houston/Corpus Christi Production Division, Houston, Texas. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on January 20, 1995 (60 FR 4195). 
The notice was subsequently amended to reflect a name change from Exxon 
Company U.S.A. to Exxon Corporation, and published in the Federal 
Register on March 31, 1995 (60 FR 16677).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The State reports that 
some of the workers of the subject firm are being denied eligibility to 
apply for TAA because they were in the Marketing Division of Exxon in 
Houston. Findings show that when the certification was issued it was 
the Department's intent to include workers of the subject firm engaged 
in employment related to the exploration and drilling for crude oil, 
and the administrative, technical and support staff. Accordingly, the 
Department is amending the certification to specifically include the 
Marketing Division of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,472A is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Exxon Company U.S.A., a/k/a Exxon Corporation, 
Houston/Corpus Christi Production Division, including the Marketing 
Division, Houston, Texas who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after October 23, 1993 are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 
1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 9th day of May 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-12440 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ John Karlsson


John Karlsson


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


June 28, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12773]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Department of Justice policy, 28 C.F.R. 
Sec. 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in 
United States v. Motorola, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 4:96-CV-226-Y was 
lodged on May 6, 1996 with the United States District Court for the 
Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth division.
    The proposed Consent Decree resolves the United States' claim for 
reimbursement of response costs incurred at the Pesses Company (S'West) 
site pursuant to Sections 104, 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 
Secs. 9604, 9606 and 9607(a) (``CERCLA''). The Consent Decree 
reimburses the United States and Texas for $2.46 million of its 
response costs at this Fort Worth, Texas site. The United States filed 
a Complaint simultaneously with the lodging of the Consent Decree 
alleging that the defendants by contract, agreement or otherwise 
arranged for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at the site 
and are subject to liability under Section 107(a)(3) of CERCLA, 42 
U.S.C. Sec. 9607(a)(3).
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Motorola et al., DOJ Ref. No. 90-11-3-665.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Region VI Office 
of the Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 
75202; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th 
Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed 
Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. 
In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $6.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 96-12773 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P-M