alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William A. BUNDY, Appellant. William BUNDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48398, WD 50803.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 9, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 27, 1996.

Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, Lee’s Summit, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and SPINDEN and SMITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated appeals from conviction, after jury trial, of four counts of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994; sentence of 25 years as prior offender, § 558.019, RSMo 1994, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25912-25913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13009]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; 
Full Council Meeting Notice

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a full 
council meeting of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and pension 
Benefit Plans will be held on June 19, 1996, in Room N3437 C&D, U.S. 
Department of Labor building, Third and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20210.
    The purpose of the meeting, which will be from 3:30 until 4:30 
p.m., is to hear progress being made by the three working groups of the 
council.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topic concerning ERISA by submitting 20 copies on or 
before May 27, 1996, to Sharon Morrissey, Acting Executive Secretary, 
ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5677, 200 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20210. Individuals or 
representatives or organizations wishing to address the Advisory 
Council should forward their request to the Acting Executive Secretary 
of telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 
minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. 
Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should 
contact Sharon Morrissey by May 27 at the address indicated in this 
notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Acting Executive Secretary of the

[[Page 25913]]

Advisory Council at the above address. Papers will be accepted and 
included in the record of the meeting if received on or before May 27, 
1996.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of May, 1996.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-13009 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp.
II (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Michael Kaswan, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Michael Kaswan                                    Dated: August 15, 2005
    ---------------------------------
    Michael Kaswan
    Chief Operating Officer
    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
```
Exhibit 32

                       SANGUI BIOTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                             A Colorado corporation

                          WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The undersigned,  Prof. Dr. Dr. Wolfgang K. Barnikol, the President,  Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Sangui Biotech International, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies that:

     (1) The Report of the  Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
     section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




Dated: September 25, 2003                  /s/ Wolfgang K. Barnokol
       ------------------                  -----------------------------------
                                      By:  Prof.Dr.Dr. Wolfgang K. Barnikol
                                      Its: President, Chief Executive and Chief
                                           Financial Officer

The foregoing certification accompanied the Form 10-KSB filing pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350. It is being reproduced herein for information only. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished ot the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
##### 



SUMMARY OF
DDi CORP.
2006 SENIOR MANAGEMENT BONUS PROGRAM
 1. Purpose and Effective Date .
 2. Eligibility and Participation .
 3. Performance Bonus .
 Calculation.
 1




---



##### 



the sum of
  Net EBITDA %
    
    % of Target EBITDA Bonus< 70%
    
    
    0
    %> 70%, but < 80%
    
    
    55.0
    %> 75%, but < 80%
    
    
    62.5
    %> 80%, but < 90%
    
    
    70.0
    %> 85%, but < 90%
    
    
    77.5
    %> 90%, but < 100%
    
    
    85.0
    %> 95%, but < 100%
    
    
    92.5
    %> 100%, but <110%
    
    
    100
    %> 105%, but <110%
    
    
    112.5
    %> 110%, but <120%
    
    
    125.0
    %> 120%
    
    
    200
    %
 plus
  Net EBITDA %
    
    % of Target Performance Bonus< 50%
    
    
    0
    %> 50%, but < 60%
    
    
    50
    %> 60%, but < 70%
    
    
    75
    %> 70%
    
    
    100
    %
 Form and Time of Payment.
 2




---



##### 



Satisfactory Performance Required. provided
 Corporate Transactions and Change of Control
 4. Termination of Participation
 Events.
  (ii)
    
    Voluntary Resignation;(iii)
    
    Death; or(iv)
    
    Disability.
 Effect of Termination For Cause or Resignation without Good Reason.
 3




---



##### 



Effect of Other Events; Pro Rata Payments.
 Termination by the Company for reasons other than Cause, Termination because of Death or
Disability, or Resignation For Good Reason.
   Employees on Leave.
 Promoted Employees.
   (A)
    
    willful refusal to perform, in any material respect, his or her
duties or responsibilities for the Company;(B)
    
    material breach of his or her duties or responsibilities to the
Company;(C)
    
    gross negligence or willful disregard in the performance of his
or her duties or responsibilities;
 4




---



##### 



(D)
    
    willful disregard, in any material respect, of any financial or
other budgetary limitations established in good faith by the Board of Directors
of the Company, if continuing after written notice;(E)
    
    engaging in conduct that causes material and demonstrable
injury, monetarily or otherwise, to the Company, including, but not limited to,
misappropriation or conversion of the Companys assets; or(F)
    
    conviction of or entry of a plea of nolo contendereto a
felony.
   5. Binding Authority .
 6. Source of Payments .
 7. Amendment or Termination .
 8. Severability .
 9. No Employment Rights .
 5




---



##### 



10. Transferability of Rights.
 11 Governing Law.
 6
EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Charles Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Micro Bio-Medical Waste
Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                                       13
<PAGE>

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: April 10, 2006


/s/ Charles Smith
    Charles Smith, CEO, CFO





                                       14
Exhibit
32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ramtal, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joel Schonfeld, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:
 
 1.
    the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15() of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/
      Joel SchonfeldJoel
      Schonfeld, Chief Executive OfficerMay
      19, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12575]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to CERCLA

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 C.F.R. Sec. 50.7, notice 
is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Consolidation Coal Co., et al, Civil Action No. 89-2124, was lodged on 
May 6, 1996 with the United States District Court for the Western 
District of Pennsylvania. This proposed consent decree would resolve 
this cost recovery action under Section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 
U.S.C. Sec. 9607, for the Swissvale Auto Surplus Parts Company Site, a 
metal reclamation and reprocessing facility near Pittsburgh, for a 
payment of $1.5 million toward reimbursement of expenditures from the 
Superfund to conduct removal actions at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Consolidation Coal Co., et al, DOJ Ref. # 90-11-3-334.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Western District of Pennsylvania, 7th and Grant 
Streets, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; the Region III Office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, 841 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 
19107; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th 
Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202-624-0892. A copy of the proposed 
consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. 
In requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $10.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel Gross,
Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources 
Division.
[FR Doc. 96-12575 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Summer Infant, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jason Macari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------
|/s/ Jason Macari        |  |  |  |                
|Jason Macari            |  |  |  | August 10, 2007
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |
**Schedule
      10.18**


Payees








1.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated February 21, 2006 by the Company
      in
      favor of PFK Acquisition Group, LLC in the amount of $100,000





2.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated February 14, 2006, by the Company
      in
      favor of Alfred F. Bracher, III in the amount of $100,000.





3.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 13, 2006, by the Company in
      favor of Howard Goldberg in the amount of $100,000.





4.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 24, 2006, by the Company in
      favor of Thomas A. Nicolette in the amount of $100,000.





5.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated February 14, 2006, by the Company
      in
      favor of Real Path, Inc. in the amount of $25,000.





6.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated February 7, 2006, by the Company
      in
      favor of Schachter Trust, Diane Schachter, Trustee in the amount of $25,000.





7.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 24, 2006, by the Company in
      favor of Harvey Goldberg in the amount of $20,000.





8.  Senior
      Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 21, 2006, by the Company in
      favor of Larry Chimerine in the amount of $10,000.
Case 2:17-mj-09501-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-09501-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-09501-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-09501-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26544-26545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13192]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26545]]

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Advisory, Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Commission Act, notice is hereby 
given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid 
(ACVFA).

    Date: June 12, 1996 (9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.).
    Location: State Department, Loy Henderson Auditorium, 23rd 
Street Entrance.
    The purposes of the meeting are to discuss and provide 
nongovernmental input on: USAID collaboration with private voluntary 
organizations (PVOs) in limited or non-presence countries, the 
status of USAID procurement reforms, and additional feasible actions 
for inclusion in the USAID Gender Plan of Action.
    The meeting is free and open to the public. However, 
notification by June 7, 1996, through the Advisory Committee 
Headquarters is required. Persons wishing to attend the meeting must 
call Lisa J. Douglas (703) 351-0243 or Susan Saragi (703) 351-0244 
or FAX (703) 351-0228/0212. Persons attending must include their 
name, organization, birthdate and social security number for 
security purposes.

    Dated: May 20, 1996.
John P. Grant,
Director, Office of Private and Voluntary Cooperation, Bureau for 
Humanitarian Response.
[FR Doc. 96-13192 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rayvon S. GIBBS, Appellant. Rayvon S. GIBBS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 61312, 63587.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 25, 1994.

Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Rayvon S. Gibbs, appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to imprisonment for twelve years on the robbery charge and for fifty years on the armed criminal action charge to be served consecutively. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion on defendant’s direct appeal. Defendant’s convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion *559would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Christian Romero-Anchondo, 

Defendant.

No. CR-17-01558-002-PHX-DJH

DETENTION ORDER 

 On February 5, 2019, Christian Romero-Anchondo (the “Defendant”) appeared 

before this Court on a Petition to Revoke Conditions of Release and submitted the issue to 

the Court. The Court considered the information provided to the Court in determining 

whether the Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(1): 

☒ There is probable cause to believe that the Defendant has committed a 

Federal, State, or local crime while on release. 

☒ There is clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant has violated 

the conditions of release. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2): 

☒ Rebuttable Presumption where Probable Cause to Believe Felony 

Committed on Pretrial Release. The Defendant has failed to rebut the 

presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will assure 

that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any other 

person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2) (providing that 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

rebuttable presumption of dangerousness applies if there is probable 

cause to believe that while on release a defendant has committed a 

Federal, State, or local felony). 

☒ Flight Risk. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not flee. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); U.S. 

v. Gotti, 794 F.2d 773, 778 (2nd Cir. 1986) (holding that “findings 

made under section 3148(b) may be established by a preponderance of 

the evidence”). 

☐ Dangerousness. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any other 

person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); Gotti, 794 

F.2d at 778. 

☒ Compliance with Conditions. The Court finds by a preponderance of 

the evidence that the Defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition or 

combination of conditions of release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(B); 

Gotti, 794 F.2d at 778. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 5th day of February, 2019. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge