alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 379 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 30, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 627) to amend the Truth in Lending 

Act to establish fair and transparent practices relating to the 

extension of credit under an open end consumer credit plan, 

and for other purposes. No general debate shall be in order 

pursuant to this resolution. The bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order 

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial 

Services now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under 

clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 
2 

•HRES 379 EH 

XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 

order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 

designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 

debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 

or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the 

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 

adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the 

House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the 

Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3 

•HRES 379 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
##### 



FIRST AMENDMENT TO  PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
    TERMS
 Purchase Price
 Inspection Period
 Ratification
 Counterparts




---



##### 



SELLER:PATRICK HENRY ASSOCIATES, L.P.By:
    
    SAP IV Patrick Henry NF GP L.L.C.,its sole general partnerBy:
    
    SAP IV Manager, Inc.its managerBy:
    
    /s/ Richard A. WilponIts:
    
    Senior Executive Vice
President
 PURCHASER:COLUMBIA EQUITY TRUST, INC.,a Maryland corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Clinton FischIts:
    
    Director of Acquisitions
H. Res. 352 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 23, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1145) to implement a National Water Research 

and Development Initiative, and for other purposes. The first 

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall 

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 

divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Science and Technology. After 

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 

under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as 

an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science and Technology now 

printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature 
2 

•HRES 352 EH 

of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under clause 10 of 

rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no 

amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 

or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the 

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 

adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the 

House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the 

Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3 

•HRES 352 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.1
  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Salon City, Inc. for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Casciola, our
President, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial
condition and results of operations.
 
 /s/ Steven Casciola
 Steven
Casciola
 President,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 August
18, 2008
 
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MICHAEL WILLIAMS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 241 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1272

MICHAEL A. MASON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA02-3667-RDB) Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: September 7, 2004 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Donald R. Livingston, Richard W. Black, Reed Lock Russell, AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael A. Mason appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Home Depot on his racial discrimination and retaliation based action. We affirm. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. , 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 324-25 (1986). We must view the factual evidence, and all justifiable inferences drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986). We conclude that viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Mason, Home Depot is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm based on the reasoning of the district court. SeeMason v. Home Depot USA, Inc. , No. CA-02- 3667-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Frank Russo, Defendant.

County Court, Kings County,

September 26, 1956.

*William J. Ostrowski*for defendant.

*Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (William I. Siegel*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Hyman Barshay, J.

This is a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for rape in the first degree, upon which the defendant, on November 29, 1937, was sentenced as a third felony offender to Sing Sing Prison for a term of 40 years and for an additional term of 5 years for being armed at the time of the commission of the crime. He bases his application on the ground that he had been deprived of his constitutional rights to a speedy trial, as guaranteed to him by section 8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

On March 14, 1933, he pleaded guilty to bigamy and was sentenced on March 27, 1933 to State prison for a term of *9175 years. On March 30, 1933, while he was serving the aforesaid sentence, he was indicted for rape in the first degree and pleaded not guilty on April 10, 1933.

On July 19, 1937, after serving four years of his term for bigamy, he was returned to the Kings County Court for trial for rape in the first degree. He offered no objection to the trial proceeding. There was no motion to dismiss the indictment for his failure to get a speedy trial. He was found guilty by a jury and on November 29, 1937, he was sentenced by the Honorable Framtllih Taylor, then a Judge of Kings County, to the term which he is now serving.

As authority for this application, the petitioner urges the holding in *People*v. *Prosser*(309 N. Y. 353) which, in my opinion, has no application. In that case, a motion was made to dismiss the indictment before the trial began on the ground that he was deprived of Ms constitutional rights to a speedy trial. The court in holding that a defendant may waive the right to a speedy trial said (pp. 359-360): “ This is not to say that a defendant may not consent to delay in bringing the indictment to trial and thereby waive his right. [Citing-cases] Not only is such a waiver spelled out where both prosecution and defense agree upon or stipulate for a postponement, but it may be implied, for example, from the fact that the defendant, although present in court, interposes no objection to a postponement sought by the district attorney. In that situation, the defendant’s silence and failure to assert his right to an immediate trial would be relevant.” The defendant, having failed to raise the objection of undue delay, waived such right. In *People ex rel. Lee*v. *Jackson*(285 App. Div. 33, 34, affd. 309 N. Y. 676) it was held, “ The contention that the prisoner did not have a speedy trial is a matter wMch must be raised at the trial, and may not be raised years after the trial by writ of habeas corpus.” Motion is denied. Submit order.
CERTIFICATIONS


I, Adam
Jenn, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Canadian Minerals, Inc.
(formerly known as Barrington Foods International, Inc.);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





April 24,
2008








/s/ 
Adam
Jenn


Adam
Jenn


Chief
Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Robert J.Zatta, certify that:

1.                  Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RockwoodHoldings, Inc.;

2.                  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)            Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)            Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)            Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2006 | /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA       |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    | Robert J. Zatta            |
|                    | Senior Vice  President and |
|                    | Chief Financial  Officer   |
|                    |                       |
|                    |                       |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13367]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Committee Name: Minority Biomedical Research Support Review 
Subcommittee, Minority Programs Review Committee.
    Date: July 10, 1996.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIGMS, 45 Center Drive, Room 1AS-19, Bethesda, MD 
20892-6200, Telephone: 301-594-2048.
    Agenda/Purpose: Review and evaluation of grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
discussions of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support [MBRS].)

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-13367 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 127829 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. LAURINDA HINKLE a nd ESTATE OF CRAIG Stephen J. Markman, D. HINKLE, by LAURIN DA HINKLE, Personal Justices Representative, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 127829 COA: 247099 Branch CC: 96-003161-NP CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO., Defendant-Appellant,

and

LEAR ROMEC, a/k/a HYDRO-AIRE, and TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, a/k/a TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor-Appellee,

and

RILEY AVIATION, INC., HANSEATIC AIR, INC., HANSEATIC AIR OF MICHIGAN, INC., COLDWATER AIR, INC., TRI-STATE AIRMOTIVE, LLC., AIRCRAFT ACCESSORIES OF OKLAHOMA, and TRI-STATE AVIATION SERVICES, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to app eal the October 28, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presente d should be reviewed by this Court.

d0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 388 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 388

Celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the 
                   goals and ideals of Mother's Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

Mr. Fortenberry (for himself, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Alexander, 
Mr. Shuler, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Shimkus, 
 Mr. Cooper, Mr. Wu, Mr. Flake, Mr. Inglis, Mr. Harper, Mr. Wolf, Mr. 
 Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Tierney, Mr. Walz, 
Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Pence, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Westmoreland, 
 and Mr. Terry) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the 
                   goals and ideals of Mother's Day.

Whereas Mother's Day is celebrated on the second Sunday of each May;
Whereas the first official Mother's Day was observed on May 10, 1908, in 
        Grafton, West Virginia, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
Whereas 2009 is the 101st anniversary of the first official Mother's Day 
        observation;
Whereas in 1908, Elmer Burkett, a U.S. senator from Nebraska, proposed making 
        Mother's Day a national holiday;
Whereas in 1914, Congress passed a resolution designating the second Sunday of 
        May as Mother's Day;
Whereas it is estimated that there are more than 82,000,000 mothers in the 
        United States;
Whereas mothers have made immeasurable contributions toward building strong 
        families, thriving communities, and ultimately a strong Nation;
Whereas the services rendered to the children of the United States by their 
        mothers have strengthened and inspired the Nation throughout its 
        history;
Whereas we honor ourselves and mothers in the United States when we revere and 
        emphasize the importance of the role of the home and family as the true 
        foundation of the Nation;
Whereas mothers continue to rise to the challenge of raising their families with 
        love, understanding, and compassion, while overcoming the challenges of 
        modern society; and
Whereas May 10, 2009, is recognized as Mother's Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives celebrates the role of 
mothers in the United States and supports the goals and ideals of 
Mother's Day.
                                 <all>
```