alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Daniel P. HAMER, Sr., Respondent, v. LITTLE BLUE VALLEY SEWER DISTRICT, Appellant.

No. WD 46024.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 26, 1993.

James W. Humphrey, Jr., Jeanne Haas McKenna, Kansas City, for appellant.

James W. Fletcher, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Little Blue Valley Sewer District, appeals the judgment of $23,713.85 in favor of respondent, Daniel P. Hamer, Sr. The jury awarded Hamer $32,154.40, which the trial court reduced by $8,440.55 for *733wages paid to Hamer prior to filing the lawsuit.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12530]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Polar Programs; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Polar 
Programs (#1209).
    Date and Time: June 3, 1996; 8:00 to 5:00 PM.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
730, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Noel D. Broadbent, Program Director for 
Arctic Social Science, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1029.
    Purpose of Meetings: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Arctic Social Science proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 14, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-12530 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ForeFront Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard M. Gozia, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ForeFront Holdings, Inc.

Dated: March 31, 2008



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/  Richard M. Gozia              
|Richard M. Gozia                   
|Interim Chief Executive Officer    
|and Interim Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONS


I, Adam
Jenn, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Canadian Minerals, Inc.
(formerly known as Barrington Foods International, Inc.);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





March 10,
2008








/s/ 
Adam
Jenn


Adam
Jenn


Chief
Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12953]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPALACHIAN STATES LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE COMMISSION


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appalachian States Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission.

ACTION: Annual meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Appalachian States Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission 
will hold an annual meeting on June 19, 1996. The meeting is open to 
the public. An executive session will be held from 9:15 am to 10:30 am 
which will be closed to the public.

DATES: June 19, 1996, 9:00 am-4:00 pm.

ADDRESSES: Harrisburg Hilton and Towers, One North Second Street, 
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Marc S. Tenan, Executive Director, 207 State Street, Harrisburg, PA 
17101, 717-234-6295.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Appalachian States Low-Level Radioactive 
Waste Commission (Commission) was established by the Appalachian States 
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact Consent Act (Public Law 100-319, 
May 19, 1988). The Commission represents the states of Delaware, 
Maryland and West Virginia, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to 
assist in the establishment of a regional low-level radioactive waste 
disposal facility as required by the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy 
Amendments Act (Public Law 99-240, January 15, 1986).
    The primary purpose of this meeting is to: consider a revised 
budget for 1996-97; consider a proposed budget for 1997-98; elect 
officers; and hear a status report on the siting of a regional LLRW 
disposal facility. A draft agenda can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission at 717-234-6295.
Marc S. Tenan,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 96-12953 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0000-00-M
#### Sally WHALEN and Jerry Haefeker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.

No. 18286.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

March 16, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 7, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied May 25, 1993.

Michael L. Lyons, Souder F. Tate, Bran-son, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Virginia L. Fry, Rana L. Faaborg, Wool-sey, Fisher, Whiteaker & McDonald, Springfield, for defendant-respondent.

*683PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment in favor of defendant on all counts of plaintiffs’ petition. The record on appeal consists of the “legal file” provided for in Rule 81.12(a).

The “statement of facts” in appellants’ brief is less than a page and a half in length. A fourth of the statement of facts is a portion irrelevant to the facts, referred to as “the issues on appeal”. There are five references to the legal file in the statement of facts. One refers to the “grounds” of plaintiffs’ petition. Two references are to an affidavit of a nonparty, Kimberly Kaye Jones, who apparently sought to intervene while the matter was in the trial court. Those references are both to the same page and do not support the facts for which they are cited. The remaining reference is to one page of an affidavit of defendant’s president, filed by defendant in the trial court, which, including exhibits, is 49 pages in length. The facts stated for that citation are only partially supported by the page reference.

Appellants’ brief contains three “points relied on”. Four references are made to the legal file in the “argument” portion of appellants’ brief. Rule 84.04 provides in part:

> ******

> (c) Statement of Facts. The statement of facts shall be a fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented for determination without argument. Such statement of facts may be followed by a resume of the testimony of each witness relevant to the points presented.

> ******

> (h) Page References in Briefs. All statements of fact and argument shall have specific page references to the legal file or the transcript.

The statement of facts in appellants’ brief did not sufficiently comply with Rule 84.04(c). As an apparent result of the deficient statement of facts in appellants’ brief, respondent’s statement of facts exceeded three pages in length.

Failing to substantially comply with Rule 84.04(c) preserves nothing for appellate review. *Wehmeyer v. Bassett Realty, Inc.,*840 S.W.2d 290, 291 (Mo.App.1992); *Simpson v. Galena R-2 School Dist.,*809 S.W.2d 457, 458 (Mo.App.1991); *Federbush v. Federbush,*667 S.W.2d 457, 458 (Mo. App.1984); *Pillow v. Sayad,*655 S.W.2d 816 (Mo.App.1983).

A gratuitous examination of the record reveals no reversible error, plain, Rule 84.-13(e), or otherwise.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
AMENDMENT

                                       TO

           NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (DATED JULY 31, 2000)

                                  June 29, 2001


     Section 2(a) of the Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement dated July 31,
2000 among YouthStream Media Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and James G. Lucchesi ("Executive"), is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

     "(a) This option shall be exercisable (to the extent vested) during the
continuance of the Executive's employment and shall be exercisable after
termination of the Executive's employment only as follows:

          (i) if the Executive's employment by the Company and its Affiliates is
terminated for any reason other than termination by the Company for cause (as
defined in the Employment Agreement) or termination by the Executive in breach
of the Employment Agreement, this option may be exercised by the Executive (or,
following the Executive's death, by the person or persons to whom his rights
under this option pass by will or by the laws of descent and distribution), to
the extent that it was exercisable at the date of termination of employment,
within twenty four months after the effective date of termination of employment,
but not later than the Termination Date; and

          (ii) if the Executive's employment is terminated by the Company for
cause or is terminated by the Executive in breach of the Employment Agreement,
this option and all rights under it, to the extent those rights have not been
exercised, shall thereupon terminate. The determination by the Company's board
of directors of the reason for termination of the Executive's employment shall
be binding and conclusive on the Executive."


                        YOUTHSTREAM MEDIA NETWORKS, INC.


                        By:      /s/ HARLAN D. PELTZ
                            -----------------------------------
                        Name:
                        Title:


                             /s/ JAMES G. LUCCHESI
                        ---------------------------------------
                        James G. Lucchesi
EXHIBIT 32.7

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2009



> By:
> 
>                                                                                         
> 
>                                                                                         /s/ John R. SproulsJohn R. SproulsPrincipal Executive Officer
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Perry Augustson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Triton Resources, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal
      quarter ended July 31, 2005, and to which this certification is attached
      as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.                                                                                                                                                         

| | By:    | /s/
      Perry Augustson                  
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------
| |        |                                            
| | Name:  | PERRY AUGUSTSON                            
| |        |                                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial   
| |        | Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer and           
| |        | Principal Financial Officer)               
| |        |                                            
| | Date:  | September 14, 2005                         

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit B 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 160-2 Filed 06/19/19 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. · 

vs 

Wyo Tech Investment Group, LLC, et al. 

State of Arizona } 

County of Maricopa} ss .. : 

---- -- ·~ · 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE 

The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says; 

Deponent is not a party herein, is over 18 years of age and resides in the state of Arizona, 

That on 02/04'2019 at 7:12 PM at 2552 East Los Alamos Street, Gilbert, AZ. 85295 

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:17-

CV -04140-DWL 

deponent served a(n) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a 

Civil Action, Appendix A, Exhibits A-C 

on Charles J. Davis witness therein named, by deliverfng thereat a true copy of each to "John Doe" (would not give his first and last 

name), a person of suitable age and discretion. Said premises is witness's dwelling place I usual place of abode within the state. Recipient 

was not cooperative. Deponent asked him, "Are you Charles J. Davis or Richard W. Davis?" He replied, "Who are you?" Deponent said, 

"I am an officer of the Superior Court, and I have some legal papers for Charles Davis or Richard Davrs from Wens Fargo Bank." He said, 

"Give me the papers." Deponent said, "Are you Charles or Richard?" He said again, "Give me the papers." Deponent served him the 

documents for both Charles J, Davis and Richard W. Davis. Then he followed deponent to the street and started picking on him. He was 

still talking when deponent got into his car. 

~npfil¥n,ofE!r@)••$Arv.ad: 

Gender: Male 

Skin:White 

Hair: Dark Hair 

Age: 45 - SO Yrs. 

Heights· aff 

Weight:160 Lbs. 

Sworn to before me this 

I~ •:v o=~ 2019 M ll1J.~ .... .,,,__ - NOTARY PUSLIC 

GAIL R. DAMMANN 1111'.J rARY f'UBUC AHIZONA 

MA~ICOPA (,CJUNTY 

COMMISSION II 549353 

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 

AUGUST2~ 2022 

Serving By lrvfng, loc f 233 Broadway, Suite 2201 I New York, NY 10279 

New York City Dept. of Consumer Affairs License No. 0761160 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 160-2 Filed 06/19/19 Page 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134176 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134176 

 COA: 276356 

Oakland CC: 2006-209325-FH 

ROBERT CLAUDE FISHER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 314 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 314

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 30, 2009.
Whereas John Andrew ``Bud'' Hillerich made the first Louisville Slugger, 
        originally known as the ``Falls City Slugger'', for Pete ``The Old 
        Gladiator'' Browning of the Louisville Eclipse in Louisville, Kentucky, 
        in 1884;
Whereas Hillerich & Bradsby Co. is a fifth-generation, family-owned company 
        celebrating its 125th anniversary;
Whereas today the Louisville Slugger is the Official Bat of Major League 
        Baseball, having had more than 8,500 professional baseball players under 
        contract, beginning in 1905 with Honus Wagner, and including Hall of 
        Fame members such as Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio, Stan 
        Musial, Mickey Mantle, Jackie Robinson, Roberto Clemente, Hank Aaron, 
        and Louisville's own Pee Wee Reese;
Whereas Hillerich & Bradsby Co. has made over 100,000,000 Louisville Slugger 
        bats in 125 years and currently makes approximately 1,800,000 bats, 
        including souvenir bats, yearly;
Whereas 80 percent of National Baseball Hall of Fame hitters were under contract 
        with Louisville Slugger;
Whereas 60 percent of today's Major League Baseball players use Louisville 
        Slugger bats;
Whereas since 1884, Hillerich & Bradsby Co. has expanded production to include 
        aluminum bats, the PowerBilt golf club, baseball and softball gloves and 
        mitts, hockey sticks, and a variety of anatomical and ergonomic gloves;
Whereas in 1996, Hillerich & Bradsby Co. opened the Louisville Slugger Museum 
        and Factory, the first museum devoted to hitters, including executive 
        offices, wood bat plant, and a world class museum, in downtown 
        Louisville, just 10 blocks away from where Bud Hillerich made the first 
        Louisville Slugger in 1884; and
Whereas the Louisville Slugger name is synonymous with baseball, evoking 
        excitement and nostalgia among ball players of all ages and skill 
        levels: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates and salutes Hillerich & Bradsby Co. on the 125th 
        anniversary of the Louisville Slugger; and
            (2) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 
        available enrolled copies of this resolution to Hillerich & Bradsby Co. 
        for appropriate display.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```