alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 87 / Friday, May 3, 1996 / Notices 19975

2Those statutory requirements were adopted in

section 6 of the Negotiated Rates Act of 1993 (Pub.

L. No. 103–180) (NRA).

3Section 204(b)(3) of the ICCTA provides that,

‘‘in the case of a proceeding under a provision of

law repeal[ed], and not reenacted, by this Act such

proceeding shall be terminated.’’

4Section 204(a) of the ICCTA provides that ‘‘[t]he

Board shall promptly rescind all regulations

established by the Interstate Commerce Commission

that are based on provisions of law repealed and not

substantively reenacted by this Act.’’

[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202)

927–5721].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a Policy

Statement served February 28, 1994 [10

I.C.C.2d 53], and published at 59 FR

10166 (March 3, 1994), the ICC

explained and interpreted statutory

requirements governing the form and

minimum content requirements for

transportation agreements executed by

motor contract carriers.2 The notice

provided for public comment.

However, the ICCTA repealed and did

not reenact section 6 of the NRA.

Because the statutory provision that

precipitated the policy statement has

been repealed and not reenacted, we are

terminating this proceeding pursuant to

the provisions of section 204(b)(3) of the

ICCTA, 3 and we are vacating the prior

policy statement pursuant to the

provisions of section 204(a) of that Act.4

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 721(a); Sections

204(a) and 204(b)(3) of the ICC Termination

Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104–88.

Decided: April 17, 1996.

By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice

Chairman Simmons, and Commissioner

Owen.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–11088 Filed 5–2–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915–00–P

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF

PEACE

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

DATE/TIME: Thursday-Saturday, May 16–

18, 1996.

LOCATION: Airlie Conference Center,

Airlie, Virginia.

STATUS: Open Session—Portions may be

closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of

Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States

Code, as provided in subsection

1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute

of Peace Act, Public Law 98–525.

AGENDA: May Board Meeting and

Annual Board/Senior Staff Program

Review; Approval of Minutes of the

Seventy-fifth Meeting of the Board of

Directors; Chairman’s Report;

President’s Report; Committee Reports;

Approval of Solicited Grants; Selection

of 1996–1997 Peace Scholars and Senior

Fellows; Selection of 1996 National

Essay Contest Winners; Other General

Issues.

CONTACT: Dr. Sheryl Brown, Director,

Office of Communications, Telephone:

(202) 457–1700.

Dated: May 1, 1996.

Charles E. Nelson,

Vice President for Management and Finance,

United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. 96–11178 Filed 5–1–96; 1:19 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820–AR–M
<PAGE>

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                      AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Moreal Chu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Visual Frontier, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Visual Frontier, Inc.

      I, Starcia Chang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Visual Frontier, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Visual Frontier, Inc.


By:  /s/ Moreal Chu
     ----------------------------
     Moreal Chu
     Chief Executive Officer and
     President


By:  /s/ Starcia Chang
     ----------------------------
     Starcia Chang
     Chief Financial Officer and
     Secretary
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrell JAMES, Appellant.

No. WD 52486.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 24, 1996.

Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joanne E. Joiner, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from conviction of sale of a controlled substance under § 195.211, RSMo, 1994.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED K IRK IAN JACKSON , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 1193 LT Case No. 2016

- CF

- 009002

- A STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. _______________________________/ Decision filed August 8, 2023 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County , Lindsay Tygart, Judge. Kirk Ian Jackson, M adison, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, an d Michael L

. Schaub, Assistant A ttorney General, Tallahass ee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. EDWARDS, C.J. , HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT , JJ., concur.
Case 3:17-cr-08285-JJT Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

Advanced Analogic Technologies (HongKong) Ltd., incorporated in Hong Kong on June 23, 1999. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies Corporation, incorporated in the BritishVirgin Islands on September 21, 1999. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies Holdings, Inc., incorporated in the British Virgin Islands onJuly 24, 2001. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies Japan, Incorporated, incorporated in Japan on August 5, 2003. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, incorporated in Macau on March 14, 2005. 

Advanced Analogic Technologies (China) Inc., incorporated in the People’s Republic of China on January 23, 2006. 

Elite Micro Devices Inc., incorporated in the Cayman Islands on September 26, 2006.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6255

LUKE TRAYLOR,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL MCCALL, Perry Correctional Institution,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(0:09-cv-00048-RBH)

Submitted: June 22, 2011 Decided: July 14, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luke Traylor, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Luke Traylor seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) 

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Traylor has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-0 428 V

Filed: June 30, 2016 Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MARSHA CRAWFORD , *

*
Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* P neumococcal C onjugate Vaccine;

v. * Prevnar 13; Shoulder Injury Related

* to Vaccine Administration ( “ SIRVA ” );

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , f or petitioner.

Justine E. Walters , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On April 4, 2016

, Marsh a Crawford (“p etitioner ”) filed a petition for compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et

seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”)

. Peti tioner alleges that she developed shoulder injuries as a result of a p neumococcal conjugate (Prevnar 13) vaccination she received

on April 16, 2015

. Pet

. at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 30, 2016

, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) R eport in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep

. at 1 . Specifically, respondent stated that the evidence establishes that petitioner’s injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine ad ministration (“ SIRVA ”) , and that the injury is not

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the ident ified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 due to factors unrelated to her April 1 6, 2015, pneumococcal conjugate vaccination

. Id.

at 3. Respondent further stated that petitioner has met all statutory and jurisdictional requirements, including having suffered the condition for more than six months. Id. at 3-

4

. R espondent concludes that entitlement to compensation is appropriate under the
terms of the Vaccine Act. Id. at 4.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record

, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
Exhibit 32.01








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asian Dragon Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ John Karlsson


By: John Karlsson


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer





Dated: May 20, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 11, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00035

- CV

Donald William FLETCHER et al, Appellant

v.

TOSCANO PROPERTIES

, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2020CV05146 Honorable John Longoria , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On January 14, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal stating his intent t o appeal his eviction. The clerk’s record was filed on March 10, 2022. The clerk’s record did not contain a
final order or judgment. In response to this court’s inquiry, the trial court clerk confirmed the trial court has not signed a final order or judgme nt. “[A]n appeal may be prosecuted only from a final judgment.” N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). Because no final order or judgment has been entered in the underlying case, appellant is ORDERED to
show cause in writing n o later than March 25 , 2022 why th is appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 11th day of March, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 30

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-35 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-35 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-35 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-35 Filed 10/09/18 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-35 Filed 10/09/18 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 10.2

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT(Office Services)

THIS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT("Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of November 4, 2008, 2008 by and between
Venoco, Inc. ("Venoco"), whose address is 370 17th St., Suite 3900, Denver, CO 80202, and Mark A. DePuy ("Independent Contractor"), whose address is 39 Nighthawk,
Irvine, CA 92604.

RECITALS:

NOW, THEREFORE,the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:



1

---





Venoco
shall compensate Independent Contractor for Services as follows:



2

---





3

---





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the date set forth above.

Venoco:

Independent Contractor:Venoco, Inc.By:

/s/ Ed O'Donnell

/s/ Mark DePuyIts:

Senior Vice President

Name:

Mark DePuy


4

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Sridhar Ganesan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of WorldSpace, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2007

/S/    SRIDHAR GANESANSridhar Ganesan Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350  (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I,
Stuart R. Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):



|/s/STUART R. LLOYDName: Stuart R. Lloyd
Date: March 15, 2004 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Showintel Networks, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for the  year  ended  December  31,  2002,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
V. Lott, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: 23rd of May, 2003.                          /s/  David V. Lott
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  David V. Lott
                                                  President
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of CorVu Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph J. Caffarelli,
President and Chief Executive Officer and I, David C. Carlson, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    September 13, 2006.

                              /s/ Joseph J. Caffarelli
                              --------------------------------------
                              Joseph J. Caffarelli
                              President and Chief Executive Officer

                              /s/ David C. Carlson
                              --------------------------------------
                              David C. Carlson
                              Chief Financial Officer