alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 570 

Directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit to the House 

of Representatives all information in the possession of the Department 

of Homeland Security relating to the immigration status of any detainees 

and foreign persons suspected of terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan (for himself, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. GARRETT of New 

Jersey, and Mr. ROYCE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit 

to the House of Representatives all information in the 

possession of the Department of Homeland Security relating to the immigration status of any detainees and 

foreign persons suspected of terrorism. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs 

2 the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit to the 

3 House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the 

4 date of adoption of this resolution, copies of any portions 

5 of all documents, records, and communications in the pos6 session of the Department of Homeland Security, includ7 ing all component agencies, referring or relating to the imVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:38 Jun 20, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR570.IH HR570

tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 570 IH 

1 migration status of any detainee or foreign person cap2 tured in Afghanistan who— 

3 (1) was notified of the person’s rights under 

4 Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 (1966)) by the 

5 Department of Justice; 

6 (2) is in the custody or under the control of the 

7 Department of Defense; 

8 (3) may be suspected of terrorism; and 

9 (4) may be subject to transfer or release into 

10 the United States for civilian or military court pro11 ceedings. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard ROBINSON, Appellant. Richard ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 66025, 68778.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

June 28, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 28,1996.

Douglas R. Hoff, St. Louis, Craig Allan Johnston, Columbia, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction by a jury of kidnapping (Count I), rape (Count II), armed criminal action (Count III), first-degree assault (Count IV), kidnapping (Count V), first-degree murder (Count VI), and armed criminal action (Count VII). Defendant was sentenced to thirty years on Count I, concurrent terms of life imprisonment on Counts II, III, IV, V and VII, and life imprisonment without parole for Count VI. Defendant asserts trial court error in the admission of evidence and refusal to sever offenses. Defendant also appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court and remand for dismissal of Defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion.

With respect to Defendant’s direct appeal, we have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error are without merit. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

With respect to Defendant’s appeal of denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing, Defendant filed his record on appeal and transcript with this court on November 7, 1994. He filed his postcon-viction motion with the circuit clerk forty-two days later on December 19, 1994. Rule 29.15(b) provides in pertinent part that

> [i]f an appeal of the judgment sought to be vacated, set aside or corrected was taken, the motion shall be filed within *thirty days*after the filing of the transcript in the appeal pursuant to Rule 30.04.

(emphasis added). Because Defendant’s postconviction motion was filed more than thirty days after the filing of the transcript in the appeal, the motion was untimely and the motion court lacked jurisdiction to consider it. *Smith v. State,*798 S.W.2d 152 (Mo. banc 1990). We therefore remand to the motion court for dismissal.
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-135197, of Spare Backup, Inc. and the
related prospectuses of our audit report dated March 17, 2008 with respect to
the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows of
Spare Backup, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 appearing in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
Certified Public Accountants


Boca Raton, Florida
April 14, 2008
| a.     | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,                2006 to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Form                10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| b.     | The                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                  |

|                                |                                                                                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:                April 26, 2006 | /s/                Richard M. Glickman                                                                |   |
|                                | Richard                M. Glickman                                                                    |   |
|                                | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 27, 2016

No. 04-16-00361-CV

Bernardo GONZALES,

Appellant

v.

COURTLAND HEIGHTS,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CV02572

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due July 22, 2016. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of 

time was filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his appellant’s brief in this court on or before 

August 8, 2016, and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. 

If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 22077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11865]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of an 
Expiring Information Collection; RI 78-11

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management will submit to the Office of Management and Budget 
a request for a clearance of an expiring information collection. RI 78-
11, Medicare Part B Certification, is used to determine eligibility for 
a Government contribution toward the cost of Medicare Part B if 
enrolled in the Retired Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

    We estimate 300 RI 78-11 forms are completed annually. Each form 
takes approximately 10 minutes to complete for an annual estimated 
burden of 50 hours.

I11For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 

or E-Mail to jmfarronmail.opm.gov.DATES: Comments on this proposal 
should be received on or before June 12, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, 1900 E Street, NW, room 3349, Washington, DC 20415-
0001, and

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW, room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Team Leader, Management Services Division, (202) 
606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Lorraine A. Green,

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 96-11865 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 09, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 09, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0134. CHEROKEE MAIN STREET, LLC v. PAMELA J. RAGAN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

15CV442
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25493-25494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12703]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3636]

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc.; Prohibited Trade 
Practices, and Affirmative Correction Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a New 
Jersey-based personal health-care products company and its parent 
corporation from misrepresenting the results or conclusions of any test 
or study concerning any over-the-counter products with a use relating 
to human reproduction, reproductive organs or sexually transmitted 
diseases (STDs). It requires the respondent to have competent and 
reliable scientific evidence for any claims regarding the efficacy of 
over-the-counter contraceptives or products to protect

[[Page 25494]]

against STDs. In addition, the respondent must have competent and 
reliable scientific evidence to substantiate the advertising claims of 
any personal lubricant and/or spermicide.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued January 18, 1996.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint, the Decision and Order, and 
Commissioner Azcuenaga's statement are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th Street & 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Badger or Matthew Gold, FTC/San Francisco Regional Office, 901 
Market Street, Suite 570, San Francisco, CA 94103.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Friday, October 27, 1995, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 60 FR 55033, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Johnson & Johnson Consumer 
Products, Inc., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. 
Interested parties were given sixty (60) days in which to submit 
comments, suggestions or objections regarding the proposed form of the 
order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 52)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12703 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lewis Dillman, Chief Executive Officer of Sun
Cal Energy, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
      the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                            

Dated: May 20, 2008

/s/ Lewis Dillman
  Lewis Dillman 
  Chief Executive Officer 
  (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sun Cal Energy,
Inc. and will be retained by Sun Cal Energy, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5


                                 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

         Acknowledgement (this "Acknowledgement"), dated as of March 11, 2003,
in connection with the Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated
as of August 30, 2001 (the "Crown Stockholders Agreement"), by and among
Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, Inc. ("HEH") (as transferee of the shares of
Class A Stock and Class B Stock previously held by Hallmark Entertainment,
Inc.), Liberty Media Corporation, Liberty Crown, Inc. (as transferee of the
shares of Class A Stock previously held by Liberty Media Corporation), VISN
Management Corp., JP Morgan Partners (BHCA), L.P., DIRECTV Enterprises, Inc.
(collectively, the "Stockholders") and Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"). (Capitalized terms used but not defined herein having the meanings
assigned to them in the Crown Stockholders Agreement.)

         WHEREAS, certain Stockholders have entered into that certain
Contribution Agreement dated as of March 11, 2003, by and among Hallmark
Entertainment Investments Co. ("HEIC") and other signatories thereto pursuant to
which certain Stockholders will contribute shares of Class A Stock or shares of
Class B Stock, in exchange for shares of Class A common stock of HEIC, par value
$.01 per share and shares of Class B common stock of HEIC, par value $.01 per
share respectively (the "Contribution ");

         WHEREAS, in connection with the Contribution, the undersigned will no
longer be a Stockholder of the Company; and

         WHEREAS, in connection with the Contribution, certain Stockholders have
entered into that certain Stockholders Agreement dated as of March 11, 2003 (the
"HEIC Stockholders Agreement") by and among HEIC and other signatories thereto
to provide for certain rights and obligations in respect of their shares of
HEIC;

         NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby acknowledges and agrees:

         That upon the completion of the Contribution, the undersigned shall no
longer have any rights pursuant to the Crown Stockholders Agreement; provided
however, that nothing herein shall limit or affect in any way any rights the
undersigned may have under the HEIC Stockholders Agreement, including without
limitation any provisions of the Crown Stockholders Agreement that are referred
to or incorporated by reference in the HEIC Stockholders Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has duly executed this
Acknowledgement as of the date first written above.

                             LIBERTY CROWN, INC.

                             By: /s/ DAVID A. JENSON /s/
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:  David A. Jenson
                                 Title: Vice President

                             LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION

                             By: /s/ DAVID A. JENSON /s/
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:  David A. Jenson
                                 Title:  Vice President
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BMX Development
Corp. for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean A.
Stewart, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify that:
  *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ Dean A.
Stewart
 Dean A.
Stewart
 Chief
Financial Officer, Controller
 
 November
11, 2009
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered January 14, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01067-CV

IN RE ARTHUR L. ROBERTSON-EL, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F97-03335-K

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
   1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


By signing below, the Principal Executive Officer hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report on Form 10-KSB fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 18th day of October 2006:



By: /s/ Douglas Dickie
    ---------------------
    Douglas Dickie
    Principal Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 29, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23-852

Lower Tribunal No. 21-16604

Maria R. Bacallao,

Appellant, 

vs.

Ruiz Janitorial Services & Maintenance Corp., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice 

Butchko, Judge.

Law Group of South Florida, LLC, and Andy Loynaz, for appellant. 

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Therese A. Savona and Rook

Elizabeth Ringer (Orlando), for appellee Palms Association of Alton Road, 

Inc.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See McCarty v. Dade Div. of Am. Hosp. Supply, 360 So. 2d

436, 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (hospital not liable where janitor slipped and 

fell on a greasy substance in a hallway that the hospital had employed her 

to clean); Parrish v. Matthews, 548 So. 2d 725, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)

(defendants not liable where plaintiff was hired to perform domestic services 

at defendants’ home and slipped on a piece of wrapping paper that was left 

on the stairs).

2