alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Manufacturers Trust Company, as Executor of Sol Disick, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,

April 11, 1956.

*612
      *Poses, Katcher & Driesen*for executor, petitioner.

*Bernard W. Goldenberg*for creditor.

*Thomas Scoble,*special guardian.

Samuel Faile, S.

In this accounting proceeding, the executor, also named as the trustee, requests a construction of the will as to its investment powers and also as to the effect of a limitation of $5,000 annually imposed with respect to the authority to invade the principal of residuary trusts.

The court determines that except as to the trust created by paragraph ‘ ‘ third ’ ’ of the will, the trustee is empowered to make such investments as are permitted by section 21 of the Personal Property Law. The provisions of article “ third *”*with respect to the fund of $5,000 bequeathed to the trustee restricts investments made by the trustee to securities of the United States, or any States, or municipalities contained therein. Paragraph “ sixteenth ” of the will contains an express grant of power with respect to the retention of investments owned by the testator at the time of his death. The grant of power thereby conferred as to investments made by the trustee is not referable to paragraph *“*third ” of the will and was not designed to impose by reference the restrictions upon investments contained in article “ third ” of the will or to impose any restrictions other than those imposed by statute as to investments made by the trustee. Although the statutory standard as to investment powers may not be imposed in violation of an expressed or implied provision to the contrary, in the absence of a contrary limitation or restriction required by the will the investment powers of the fiduciary extend to those investments permitted by the statute. *(Matter of Wilson,*127 N. Y. S. 2d 876.)

*613As to the limitation of $5,000 annually, imposed upon invasions of trust principal, the will is construed as authorizing principal invasions for the purposes stated not to exceed $5,000 annually with respect to each of the trusts created by the will. By his will the testator created three separate trusts, one comprising one half of his residuary estate and the others each comprising one fourth of his residuary estate. By. the will the trustee is authorized in its sole discretion to invade principal to defray expenses for medicines, medical advice, surgery or medical treatment incurred by the wife and children of testator. Considering that the will provides for the creation of three separate trusts, and the respective amounts of the corpus of each trust, as well as the broad discretion conferred upon the trustee and the nature of the purpose and the relationship of the persons for whose benefit such invasions are authorized, it is apparent that the limitation of $5,000 annually was intended to apply to each of the trusts and that such provision was not designed to impose an aggregate limitation of $5,000 annually upon all three trusts.

Settle decree construing the will accordingly.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael CUNNINGHAM, Appellant. Michael CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 59190, 61911.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

June 29, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 9, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 28, 1993.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Saleeby, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*794Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., and SMITH and STEPHAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Michael Cunningham, appeals his jury conviction in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County for four counts of burglary in the first degree, four counts of rape, four counts of sodomy, one count of stealing, and four counts of armed criminal action. Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment on each of the counts. Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error of law on the part of the trial court. Additionally, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AdZone Research, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Cardona,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of July 2003.


/s/ Charles Cardona
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
CMON DAWN RB wWHY YE

NN RY NY NY NK NY NY NY He S| Se Se ee Se eS He
SIA KDA BF wWwNH KF SO wMeANI A NAR WN HK SO

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney
District of Arizona

Beverly K. Anderson

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Arizona State Bar No. 010547
United States Courthouse

405 W. Congress Street, Suite 4800
Tucson, Arizona 85701

Telephone: 520-620-7300

Email: bey andersonig.usdoj gow
Attorneys for Plainti
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,
17-mj-08749-TUC-BGM

Plaintiff,
MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
AND QUASH ARREST WARRANT
Ahmad Suhad Ahmad,
UNDER SEAL
Defendant.

The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, and
pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), dismisses the complaint without
prejudice against Defendant, Ahmad Suhad Ahmad, and moves to quash the arrest warrant
for the defendant issued November 8, 2017, and any other arrest warrants for the defendant
in this case. A form of order is attached.

Respectfully submitted this 16th day of March, 2018.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney
District of Arizona

BEVERLY K. ANDERSON
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Exhibit  32.1




                             CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906
                             OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection  with  the amended annual  report  of  Meridian  Holdings,  Inc.
(the "Company")  on  Form  10-KSB/A  for the period  ending  December  31, 2003
as Filed  with   the   Securities   and   Exchange  Commission  on   the   date
Hereof  (the  "Report"), I,  Anthony  C.  Dike, the  Chief  Executive  Officer,
 certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted pursuant   to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by Section 906,
or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of this
written statement required  by Section 906,  has been  provided to InterCare DX,
Inc.,  and  will  be  retained   by   InterCare  DX, Inc.., and furnished to the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE:  January 10,   2005        By:  /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        -------------------
                                         Anthony  C.  Dike
                                         Chairman  and  CEO
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBLHealthcare Acquisition Corp. II (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for the periodending March  31,  2006 (the‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Marlene Krauss, M.D.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

2.        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of theCompany.

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  |                     |  |  |  |  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------------|--|--|--|--|
| By: /s/ Marlene Krauss, M.D.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | Dated: May  15,2006 |
|                Marlene Krauss,M.D.               Chief ExecutiveOfficer               (Principal ExecutiveOfficer) |  |                |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE



For value received, Leslie S. Robins, (the "Borrower") promises to pay to the
order of Advanced Optics Electronics, Inc. (the "Lender") Forty Eight Thousand
Dollars ($48,000.00) with interest at ten percent (10%) per year, computed on
the basis of 360-day years.

Interest payments of $1,200.00 shall be payable in arrears quarterly on December
7; March 7; June 7 and September 7 of each year starting with November 3, 2000.
The principal amount of this note shall be payable at the end of 36 months on
September 7, 2003. The borrower shall have the right to prepay all or any part
of this note at any time without penalty.


Date:  Thursday, September 07, 2000




 /s/ LESLIE S. ROBINS
-----------------------------------
Leslie S. Robins
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 6, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41254

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISAAC DIAZ-MEDINA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:05-CR-1706

--------------------

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Isaac Diaz-Medina

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION


OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Rick
H. Luk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




I, Yong
Xu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




By:
            /s/ Rick LukRick
      H. LukChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
              Officer)By:
            /s/ Yong XuYong
      XuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




July 12,
2010
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 District of Arizona

United States of America

Scott Daniel Warren

17-mj-341-TUC-RCC-JR

First Look Media Inc.

04/29/2019 /s/ Gregg P. Leslie

Gregg P. Leslie, # 035040

ASU SDO College of Law

111 E. Taylor St., Mail Code 8820

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Gregg.Leslie@asu.edu

(480) 727-7398

(602) 496-1382

Case 4:17-mj-00341-RCC-JR Document 109 Filed 04/29/19 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13126]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 102 / Friday, May 24, 1996 / 
Notices

[[Page 26154]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Willamette Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Willamette PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, 
June 19 and Thursday June 20, 1996. The meeting on June 20th will be 
held in Conference Room ``A' of the Grand Manor Inn, 971 Kurse Way 
(just off Gateway Street); Springfield, Oregon 97477; phone (541) 726-
4769 or 1-800-626-1900. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1:00 p.m. 
and conclude at approximately 4:00 p.m. Topics tentatively scheduled on 
the agenda include: (1) Advisory Committee involvement in flood 
assessment and restoration, (2) Update on activities by agency 
managers, and (3) a public forum.
    The meeting is open to the public and opportunity will be available 
to address the Advisory Committee during the public forum. Time 
allotted for individual presentations to the committee will be limited 
to 3-5 minutes each. Written comments are encouraged and can be 
submitted prior to the meeting.
    On Thursday, June 20th, the Advisory Committee will tour areas on 
the Eugene District Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Willamette 
National Forest. The trip will begin at the Eugene District of the BLM, 
2890 Chad Drive; Eugene, Oregon 97401; at 7:45 a.m. and will end at the 
BLM District Office at about 4:00 p.m. Focus of the field trip will be 
on watershed restoration projects, impacts of the February flooding, 
and watershed analysis. Citizens are also welcome to join the June 20th 
field review but must provide their own transportation. Travel will be 
on double- and single-lane paved and improved-gravel roads.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For more information regarding this meeting, contact Neal Forrester, 
Designated Federal Official; Willamette National Forest, 211 East 
Seventh Avenue; Eugene, Oregon 97401; (541) 465-6924.

    Dated: May 20, 1996.
Marsha Scutvick,
Administration Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13126 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Micro Bio-Medical Waste Systems, Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

/s/ Scott Ervin
--------------------------------------
Scott Ervin, President

/s/ Charles Smith
--------------------------------------
Charles Smith, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: April 26, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2021

No. 04-20-00062-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.M., B.M. AND A.B.M., MINOR CHILDREN

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-09419

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due June 1, 

2021.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Teda Travel Incorporated Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Hon Ming Wong, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Teda Travel Incorporated and will be
retained by Teda Travel Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                                           | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Hon Ming Wong                                         | 
| |                                                           | 
| | Hon Ming Wong                                             | 
| | Chief
  Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial Officer) | 



---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEB 7, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-13573 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60037-JIC-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROSMIRA CALLE DE REINA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(February 7, 2012)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Sheryl Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Rosmira Calle de Reina, has filed a

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record

reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,

and Reina’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2