alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Curtis Wayne Pritchett, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Global Logistics Support SVC, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-04442-PHX-SMM

ORDER 

 Before the Court is Plaintiff Curtis Wayne Pritchett’s Motion for Extension to 

Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42). Plaintiff asks for an extension of 60 

to 90 days to respond to Defendant Global Logistics Support SVC’s motion for summary 

judgment. Plaintiff does not explain why he needs the extension of time. 

Plaintiff’s response to the motion for summary was originally due on January 2, 

2019. Plaintiff neither responded nor filed a motion for extension of time. Because Plaintiff 

is proceeding pro se, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond by 5:00 p.m. on January 21, 

2019. (Doc. 41.) On January 18, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to extend time. (Doc. 42.) 

This is a consistent pattern with Plaintiff. Defendant filed a partial motion to dismiss 

on December 8, 2017. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff did not respond and, on January 3, 2018, the Court 

ordered Plaintiff to file a response by January 17, 2018. (Doc. 12.) On January 22, 2018, 

Plaintiff mailed the Court a letter explaining the reason for his failure to respond and filed 

a motion for extension of time to respond. (Docs. 16, 17.) The Court granted the motion to 

extend time, giving Plaintiff until February 21, 2018, to respond. (Doc. 19.) Plaintiff once 

Case 2:17-cv-04442-SMM Document 46 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

again did not respond, and the Court granted the partial motion to dismiss. (Docs. 21, 22.) 

The Court also set a case management conference for March 30, 2018. (Doc. 22.) Plaintiff 

did not appear at the conference. (Doc. 29.) 

Considering Plaintiff’s consistent failure to meet deadlines and comply with this 

Court’s orders, as well as Plaintiff’s failure to show good cause for any extension of the 

response deadline, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion for an extension in part. Although 

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court has provided him with numerous extensions of 

time to respond. The Court will grant Plaintiff a short extension of time, to allow Plaintiff 

to file a response, but no further extensions of time will be granted. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension to 

Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant’s 

motion for summary judgment by 5:00 p.m. on February 15, 2019. 

Dated this 24th day of January, 2019. 

Honorable Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:17-cv-04442-SMM Document 46 Filed 01/24/19 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26220-26221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13120]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,356; TA-W-31,356F]


Jeld-Wen of Bend/Bend Millwork Including Pozzi Window and Bend 
Door Company, Bend, Oregon and Jeld-Wen of Arizona, Flagstaff, Arizona; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to

[[Page 26221]]

Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on September 21, 1995, 
applicable to all workers of Jeld-Wen of Bend/Bend Millwork, Bend, 
Oregon. The notice was published in the Federal Register on October 5, 
1995 (60 FR 52213). The worker certification was amended October 24, 
1995, to include workers at Pozzi Window and Bend Door Company, also 
located in Bend, Oregon. The amended notice was published in the 
Federal Register on November 7, 1995, (60 FR 56172).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New finding show that 
worker separations have occurred at other production facilities of the 
subject firm in Flagstaff, Arizona. The workers at the Flagstaff plant 
also produce commodity millwork.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Jeld-Wen of Arizona, Flagstaff, Arizona, who were adversely 
affected by increased imports. Accordingly, the Department is again 
amending the certification to include all workers of Jeld-Wen of 
Arizona, Flagstaff, Arizona.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,356 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Jeld-Wen of Bend/Bend Millwork, including Pozzi 
Window and Bend Door Company, Bend, Oregon (TA-W-31,356), and Jeld-
Wen of Arizona, Flagstaff, Arizona (TA-W-31,356F), who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 9, 
1994, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 7th day of May, 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manger, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-13120 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 32.2


                 CERTIFICATE OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE

      I, Jeff Sanders, Senior Vice President - Finance of Integrity Bancshares,
Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:

      (3)   the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this
            certificate is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
            with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and

      (4)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


Dated: March 29, 2004
                                 /s/ Jeff Sanders
                                 ------------------------------------
                                 Jeff Sanders, Senior Vice President - Finance
                                 (Equivalent of Chief Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Annunziata, Mc Clanahan and Senior Judge Coleman

WILLIE MAE HANSELL MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2735-03-1 PER CURIAM MARCH 9, 2004 GAMES FARMERS MARKET AND EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Willie Mae Hansell, pro se , on brief). (Stephen A. Strickler; Inman & Strickler, PLC, on brief), for appellees.

Willie Mae Hansell appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying her Claim for Benefits for carpal tunnel syndrome. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordi ngly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Hansell v. Games Farmers Market , VWC File No. 210-26-59 (Oct. 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the de cisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
H. Res. 378 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 12, 2009. 

Whereas May 4, 2009, marks the 30th anniversary of the 

first woman sworn in as the Prime Minister of the 

United Kingdom, Margaret Hilda Thatcher; 

Whereas Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister of the 

United Kingdom from 1979 to 1990 and at the time of 

her resignation, was the longest continuously serving 

Prime Minster since 1827; 

Whereas Prime Minister Thatcher was Leader of the Conservative Party from 1975 to 1990 and the only woman 

to ever hold that post; 

Whereas Margaret Thatcher is the only woman to have ever 

held the post of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; 

Whereas Margaret Thatcher is the only Prime Minister of the 

United Kingdom in the 20th century to win three consecutive terms; 

Whereas Margaret Thatcher gave birth to a new distinctive 

ideology known as ‘‘Thatcherism’’ which emphasized individual responsibility in the United Kingdom’s monetary 

and social policies; 

Whereas Time Magazine named Margaret Thatcher one of 

the 20 most influential leaders of the 20th century; 
2 

•HRES 378 EH 

Whereas the strong, cooperative stances held by Prime Minister Thatcher, President Ronald Reagan, and Pope John 

Paul II are widely acknowledged to have been key forces 

in the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union; 

Whereas the special relationship between the United States 

and the United Kingdom was greatly strengthened under 

the tenure of Prime Minister Thatcher; 

Whereas, on January 19, 1976, Prime Minister Thatcher delivered a bold speech against the communist regime of 

the Soviet Union, which prompted the Soviet Union 

Army’s newspaper, the Red Star, to coin her the ‘‘Iron 

Lady’’; 

Whereas in 1990, Margaret Thatcher was honored by Queen 

Elizabeth II with the Order of Merit, one of the United 

Kingdom’s highest distinctions; and 

Whereas in 1992, Queen Elizabeth II bestowed a life peerage 

upon Margaret Thatcher, conferring upon her the title of 

Baroness and providing a lifetime seat in the House of 

Lords: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) acknowledges the 30th anniversary of the election of Margaret Thatcher as the first female Prime 

Minister of the United Kingdom; 

(2) pays tribute to the remarkable professional 

achievements of Margaret Thatcher; 

(3) recognizes Prime Minister Thatcher’s dedicated 

work in promoting individual rights and free markets 

around the world; and 
3 

•HRES 378 EH 

(4) appreciates the strong diplomatic relationship 

between the United States and the United Kingdom fostered by Prime Minister Thatcher. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.7b



SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL AGREEMENTS TO PLEDGE AND SECURITY
AGREEMENT CONSTITUTING EXHIBIT 4.7a HERETO


1. Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of August 24, 2000 from Reliant Energy
Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy Northeast Management Company,
Reliant Energy Maryland Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy New Jersey Holdings, LLC
and Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Services, Inc., as pledgors, to Keystone
Lessor Genco LLC, assigned from Keystone Lessor Genco LLC to Bankers Trust
Company

2. Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of August 24, 2000 from Reliant Energy
Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy Northeast Management Company,
Reliant Energy Maryland Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy New Jersey Holdings, LLC
and Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Services, Inc., as pledgors, to Shawville
Lessor Genco LLC, assigned from Shawville Lessor Genco LLC to Bankers Trust
Company
EXHIBIT 32.7

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2008



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)




38
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Asia Cork Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





February
11, 2010








By: /s/ Pengcheng
Chen


Pengcheng
Chen, CEO
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13037]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

War Risk Insurance

    The Office of Inspector General of the Department of Transportation 
conducted an audit of the Maritime Administration's (MARAD) Financial 
Statement as of September 30, 1994 (Report No: AD-MA-5-006). Section 
II: AUDIT REPORT stated that MARAD needed to clarify the participating 
shipowners' responsibility for losses under the Title XII war risk 
interim binder program. MARAD had not specifically stated in program 
documents that losses incurred during the 30 day binder period would be 
fully recovered through the premiums assessed to participating 
shipowners.
    The purpose of this Notice is to clarify the arrangements for the 
funding of losses under the binder program, if and when it is ever 
activated. It remains the intent of this program that all losses will 
be paid through the assessment of premiums to the shipowners enrolled 
in the program. Rates will be fixed promptly upon the activation of the 
program. Should there be any claims and any shortfall in the Title XII 
War Risk Insurance Fund, additional premiums would be assessed to 
enrolled shipowners on a mutual basis. Such assessments will be based 
on this formula: Each participating shipowner's values for its vessels 
(numerator) over total stated values for all vessels (denominator) 
times the shortfall. This assessment procedure will be incorporated on 
revised Form MA-942, which may be obtained from MARAD or from the 
American War Risk Agency, which is incorporated by reference in 46 CFR 
308.3(a), as revised (61 FR 1130; Jan. 16, 1996). For further 
information contact: Edmond J. Fitzgerald, Director, Office of Subsidy 
and Insurance, Maritime Administration, Washington, DC 20590 or 
telephone (202) 366-2400.


    By order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-13037 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
Exhibit 32.7

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 7, 2008



By:

/s/ John R. SproulsJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 23-1161 September Term, 2023 SEC-20 23-6 4 Filed O n: March 21 , 20 24 John Doe, Pet itione r
v . Secu rities an d E xchan ge Com mission ,

Respo nde nt PETITIO N FOR REVIE W FROM A N ORDER OF THE SECURITIES A ND EXCHA NGE COMMISSI ON BEFORE: Hend erson , Millett, a nd W alker, Circuit Ju dges J U D G M E N T T his pe tition for review of an orde r of

the Se curities a nd Exchange Com mission (“SEC”) was co nside red o n th e b riefs an d a ppe ndix filed b y the pa rties. S ee Fed. R. App . P. 34 (a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 3 4(j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e p etition for review be de nied . P etition er has notsho w n th at t he SEC’s May 26, 202 3 o rder de nying his whistleblower award app lication was a rbitrary , cap ricious, a n a buse of discretio n, o r oth erw ise no t in accord ance w ith law. Se e 1 5 U.S .C. § 78u -6(f); 5 U.S .C. § 706 (2). T he decla ration s subm itted by agency attorn eys ex plain tha t th e whistleblower informa tion subm itted by pet itione r did n ot in an y way assist or co ntribu te t o th e co v ered actio n. Pet itione r has provided n o p ersua siv e rea son to que stion the se a ssertion s. S ee Doe v. SEC, 846 F. App ’x 1, 4 (D.C. Cir. 20 21). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00408

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.L. , K.R.L., and M.C.L., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA01348

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is

AFFIRMED.

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Father because he is indigent.

SIGNED November 29, 2017.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
STATE
      OF
      DELAWARE


__________





CERTIFICATE
      OF AMENDMENT


OF


CERTIFICATE
      OF INCORPORATION


__________





FREEDOM
      FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.





Freedom
      Financial Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
      of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby
      certify:





FIRST:
      That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Freedom Financial Group, Inc.
      resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
      Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment
      to be
      advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for
      consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment
      is as
      follows:





RESOLVED
      That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be amended as
      follows:





1.  The
      second sentence of §4.6(E) which reads as follows:





At
      any
      meeting held for the purpose of electing directors, the presence in person
      or by
      proxy of a majority of the voting power then outstanding shall constitute a
      quorum for the election of directors.





be
      deleted from the Certificate of Incorporation.





2.  Article
      Sixth, granting the Directors the power to establish the Bylaws of the
      Corporation, shall be amended to add the second sentence, in italics, so that
      it
      shall thereafter read as follows:





Except
      as
      otherwise provided in this Certificate, in furtherance and not in limitation
      of
      the powers conferred by statute, the Board of Directors of this Corporation
      is
      expressly authorized to make, alter, amend, rescind, or repeal the Bylaws of
      the
      Corporation. *The
      Board of Directors may determine the quorum required for any meeting for the
      transaction of any business of the corporation, provided that such quorum shall
      not be less than thirty five percent (35%) of the outstanding voting shares
      of
      such greater number as may be required by Delaware General Corporation Law
      Section 216.*





SECOND:
      That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a special
      meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon
      notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
      State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required
      by
      statute were voted in favor of the amendment.








THIRD:
      That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
      Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
      Delaware.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this certificate to be signed
      this
      28th day of August, 2008.





By
            /s/
                Thomas M. HolgateThomas
                M. Holgate, Secretary
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  January 17, 2012





/s/ John B. Connally III


John B. Connally III, President and C.E.O.


(Principal Executive Officer)
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-01063-CV

In the Interest of S.A.H., a Child Appealed from the 245th District Court 

of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2006-

75715). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Brown. Chief 

Justice Frost and Justice Donovan also 

participating.

TO THE 245TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on November 18, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in 

these words:

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Nicolas Froylan 

Perez, signed November 13, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the 

court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Mirna Leticia Alcantar, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court 

of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, January 29, 2015.