alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Aviza Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                 the accompanying report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarter ended June 27, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                 the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

 

 

Date:August 6, 2008

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Jerauld J. Cutini                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | Jerauld J. Cutini                     |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8943]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service


National Institutes of Health; Statement of Organizations, 
Functions and Delegations of Authority

    Part H, Chapter HN (National Institutes of Health) of the Statement 
of Organizations, Functions and Delegations of Authority of the 
Department of Health and Human Services (40 FR 22859, May 27, 1975, as 
amended most recently at 60 FR 5940-1, January 31, 1995), is amended to 
reflect the establishment of the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) 
within the National Center for Human Genome Research (NCHGR). The 
establishment of the OPC will streamline organization within the NCHGR 
Office of the Director, reduce the number of supervisory layers, and 
enable the Center to function more efficiently and effectively.
    Section HN-B, Organization and Functions is amended as follows:
    Under the heading National Center for Human Genome Research (HN4), 
delete the title and functional statement for Office of Program 
Planning and Legislation (HN 415) in their entirety and substitute the 
following:
    Office of Policy Coordination (HN415).
    (1) Advises the Director, Deputy Director, and senior Center staff 
on a broad range of policy matters; (2) develops and implements the 
program planning and evaluation activities of the NCHGR: (3) analyzes 
and tracks legislation impacting on the mission of the Center, and 
makes recommendations to the Director, NCHGR for legislative proposals; 
(4) develops a broad communications program aimed at disseminating 
information about the Human Genome Project and other NCHGR programs; 
(5) conducts and coordinates policy analysis related to the ethical, 
legal and social implications (ELSI) of human genome research and 
oversees the activities of the ELSI Working Group; (6) plans and 
coordinates compute network operations; and (7) coordinates all aspects 
of committee management, including the activities of all 
Congressionally-mandated committees and advisory councils.
    Under the heading Office of Human Genome Communications (HN413) 
delete the title and functional statement in their entirety. The 
activities of this office have been incorporated into the functional 
statement for the Office of Policy Coordination.

    Dated: March 24, 1995
Harold Varmus,
Director, NIH
[FR Doc. 95-8943 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00857-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.V., a Child

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-PA-00239

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the decree of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal 

because he qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED July 17, 2019.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### Robert R. Scott Corp., Respondent, *v.*D. Kwitman & Son, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 30, 1955.

*813
      *Morris J. Mayer*for appellant.

*Albert Lyons*and *Frederick E. M. Ballon*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The uncontradicted evidence, admitted without objection by plaintiff, established that plaintiff was not the real party in interest. In the circumstances, the failure to plead that plaintiff was not the real party in interest was not fatal *(Whiting*v. *Glass,*217 N. Y. 333; *Massi*v. *Alben Builders,*270 App. Div. 482).

Furthermore, plaintiff, having chosen to keep the contract alive, notwithstanding defendant’s request for cancellation, was obligated to tender proper performance *(Rubber Trading Co.*v. *Manhattan Rubber Mfg. Co.,*221 N. Y. 120, 126; *Richardson*on Contracts [5th ed.], p. 361). Its tender of 1,972 yards as performance of a contract calling for about 3,000 yards was not a good tender (Personal Property Law, § 125, subd. 1; § 126, subd. 1). The record contains no evidence that defendant waived this defect by refusing the tender on grounds other than its quantity shortage.

Moreover, there was no evidence as to the market value on September 28, when the tender was refused, or on September 30, when plaintiff’s time for performance expired. Evidence as to market value in *“*the early part of October ” was immaterial.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Schreiber and Hecht, JJ., concur; Hofstadter, J., concurs in reversal, but votes that dismissal be without prejudice to a new action by the real party in interest.

Judgment reversed, etc.
EXHIBIT 10.19

Agreement, dated as of July 12, 2000 between Charles Zhang and Pacific Century Cyberworks

This Agreement is hereby executed on the 12th
day of July, 2000 between:

1. Pacific Century CyberWorks Ltd., whose principal place of business is at 39th
floor, Citibank Tower, Citibank Plaza, 3 Garden Road, Hong Kong ("PCCW"), and

2. Charles Zhang at 7 Jianguomen Nei Avenue, Suite 1519, Tower 2, Bright China Chang An Building, Beijing 100005, China.

Now it is hereby agreed as follows:

Charles Zhang hereby agrees to procure Sohu.com, Inc. to purchase within a period of three years from the date hereof not less than United States Dollars Six Million (US$6,000,000) of services, including but
not limited to, web distribution, advertising, consultancy services and such other services, from PCCW and its affiliated group companies at the then current fees and charges as shown in the relevant rate cards.

|Pacific Century CyberWorks Ltd. | Charles Zhang       
|------------------------------- | --------------------
|                                |                     
|/s/ Mico Chung                  | /s/ Charles Zhang   
|                                |                     
|Date: 12th
July 2000            | Date: 12th
July 2000

1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT
OF
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

1.     The
undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. ("Crown Media Holdings"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-K Report of Crown Media Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2010.

2.     I
certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Crown Media Holdings.



/s/ MICHAEL J. HARMON Michael J. Harmon Interim Chief Financial Officer


---
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00289

- CR

T AYMOR T RAVON M C I NTYRE

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T E XAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County ( 1511547D )

January 28, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was n o error in t he trial court’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the

trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles Lee,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-00567-TUC-DCB

ORDER 

On October 25, 2019, the Court granted in part and denied in part summary 

judgment for Defendants, with the Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical claims 

proceeding to trial against Defendants Nunez, Corizon, Schmid in his individual capacity, 

and Profiri in his official capacity. The Court appointed Plaintiff counsel, pro bono, for 

purposes of settlement and trial. The Court also allowed 14 days for the Plaintiff to show 

cause, in writing, why Defendant Nunez should not be dismissed, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

P.4(m), for lack of service. The Court gave Plaintiff notice that a failure to show cause 

would result in the dismissal of Defendant Nunez from the action. (Order (Doc. 42) at 24.)

The time has expired for the showing of cause, and the Plaintiff has failed to file 

any written document responsive to the Court’s Order to show cause.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff having failed to make any showing for cause as to 

/////

/////
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

why Defendant was not served a copy of the Summons and Complaint, Defendant Nunez 

SHALL BE DISMISSED from the action.

Dated this 27th day of November, 2019.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash

Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 364-7000

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Joseph Sorge, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Yelp, Inc., 

Defendant. 

No. 2:17-cv-04518-JJT 

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF 

DEFENDANT YELP INC.’S 

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL 

MANDATORY INITIAL 

DISCOVERY REPSONSES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Defendant Yelp Inc. (“Defendant”), by and 

through undersigned counsel, served its Second Supplemental Mandatory Initial Discovery 

Responses on counsel for Plaintiff Joseph Sorge by electronic mail on November 19, 2018. 

DATED this 19th day of November 2018. 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, 

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 

By: s/ Alexandra J. Gill 

L. Eric Dowell 

Alexandra J. Gill 

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800 

Phoenix, Arizona 85016 

Attorneys for Defendant Yelp Inc. 

L. Eric Dowell, SBN 011458 

Alexandra J. Gill, SBN 027506 

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., SBN 00504800 

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800 

Phoenix, Arizona 85016 

Telephone: (602) 778-3700 

Fax: (602) 778-3750 

Eric.Dowell@OgletreeDeakins.com 

Alexandra.Gill@OgletreeDeakins.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Yelp Inc. 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash,

Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

2415 East Camelback road, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 364-7000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 19th day of November 2018, I electronically transmitted 

the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF Systems for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: 

Joshua W. Carden 

Joshua Carden Law Firm, P.C. 

16427 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 410 

Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 

joshua@cardenlawfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Joseph Sorge 

s/ Debra A. Irwin 

36414443.1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LU I SA X I A CH O Q U I P, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 71762 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 953- 465 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 10, 2013 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L ui saX i a C ho qu i p, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rs um m ar i l ya f f i rm i ng the de c i s i on of a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ( “I J ” ) d e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n . O u rju r is d ic tio n is go verned by 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for abu se of di sc re t i on an IJ ’ s deni alof a 

# FI LED JU N 13 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 71762 2 m o tio n to r e o p e n . A vagyan v. H older , 6 4 6 F .3 d6 7 2 , 6 7 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) . W e d e n yi n p arta n dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e I Jd idn o t ab u s e h is d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g X iaC h o q u ip ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n a s u n tim e lyb e c au s e X iaC h o q u ip f ile dh e rm o tio n to r e o p e n ap p r o x im a te ly th irte e n y e ar s a f

te ris s u an c e o f

th e f in a l o r d e ro f

d e p o rta tio n , se e 8 C. F. R. §§ 10 03 . 23 (b)( 1), 12 41 . 1(f) , she f ai l ed t o d em on strat e the du e di l i gence nece ss ary to w a rr a n t e q u itab le to llin g o f th e f ilin g d e a d lin e , se e A v agy an , 646 F . 3d a t679, and the devel op m ent s i n U . S . as ylum l aw thatshe i dent i fi es do no tconst i tut e a m a te r ia l c h an g e in c o n d itio n s in G u a te m a lath a t w o u ldq u a lif yf o ra n e x c e p tio n to th e f ilin g d e a d lin e , se e A z n o rv . A s h c r o ft , 36 4 F . 3d 10 13 , 10 22 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). T he courtl ac ks j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew X i a C ho qu i p’ s c on t ent i on thatm ent al tr au m ap r e v e n te dh e rf

r o m a s s e rtin g h e ra s y lu m c la im e ar lie r , b e c au s e s h e f a ile dto e x h au s t th is is s u e b e f

o r e th e a g e n c y . See T

i j an iv. H older , 628 F . 3d 1071, 1080 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( “ W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew l egalcl ai m s notpres ent ed i n an al i en’ s a dm i ni strat i ve proceedi ng s bef ore the B IA . ”) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of Parke Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Vito S. Pantilione, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Robert A. Kuehl, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

May 14, 2008

 

 

| /s/ Robert A. Kuehl             |   | /s/ Vito S. Pantilione                |
|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Robert A. Kuehl                 |   | Vito S. Pantilione                    |
| Senior Vice President and Chief |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Financial Officer               |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
| (Principal Accounting Officer)  |   |                                  |
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                    AGREEMENT DATED AS OF AUGUST 26, 1999


                  BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1999-10


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), Subservicer for BA Mortgage, LLC, successor in interest by merger
of NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), the Servicer in connection
with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-10, do hereby certify that
(i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year and of its performance under this Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made
under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under the
Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                    By:
                                       ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv M59
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12994]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 21, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-12994 Filed 5-20-96; 1:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Order entered September 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00292-CR

PERRY SMART, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-56097-P

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On August 9, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On September 6, 2013, we received the reporter’s record. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the August 9, 2013 order 

requiring findings.

We GRANT the August 21, 2013 extension request file by Lizabeth Kellett. The 

reporter’s record is considered properly filed.

We note that while the Master Index contains the list of exhibit numbers and where in the 

record the exhibits were admitted into evidence, the list does not identify what those exhibits are. 

Moreover, the exhibit volume does not contain an index of the exhibits contained therein. 
Therefore, the reporter’s record is not in compliance with rule 3.23 of the Uniform Format 

Manual for Texas Reporters’ Records.

Accordingly, we ORDER Lizabeth Kellett, official court reporter, 203rd Judicial District 

Court, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, an amended Master Index the 

complies with the rules and correctly identifies the exhibits by number, description, and detail of 

where they were offered and admitted into evidence. If Ms. Kellett does not file the amended 

Master Index within the time specified, the Court will utilize the available remedies, including 

ordering that she not sit as a court reporter until she has complied with this order. 

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FORTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Teresa Hawthorne, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judicial District Court; Lizabeth Kellett, 

official court reporter, 203rd Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-8033
TIMOTHY GENE HARPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CURRITUCK COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03004) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Gene Harper, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Timothy Gene Harper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harper v. Currituck County Clerk of Courts , No. 5:06-ct-03004 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED