alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of W. S. INDUSTRIES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James F.
Dempsey, President and Chief Executive Officer, respectively, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:









1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









Date:
April 14, 2010




By: /s/ James F.
Dempsey







James
F. Dempsey


Chief
Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12814]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Application

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
section 10 (c) of he Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531, et seq.).

PRT-814965

    Applicant: Dr. Allan M. Hale, Rust Environment and Infrastructure, 
Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio.
    The applicant requests a permit to take (capture and release) 
Indiana Bats (Myotis sodalis) within Martin, Greene, and Lawrence 
Counties, Indiana. Surveys are proposed to document presence or absence 
of the species on behalf of the Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare 
Center, Crane, Indiana, and activities are proposed to enhance survival 
of the species in the wild.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological 
Services Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-
4056, and must be received within 30 days of the date of this 
publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review by any party who submits a written request for a 
copy of such documents to the following office within 30 days of the 
date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Division of Ecological Services Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort 
Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056. Telephone: (612/725-3536 x250); FAX: 
(612/725-3526).

    Dated: May 15, 1996.
Matthias A. Kerschbaum,
Acting Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fish 
and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 96-12814 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
EXHIBIT 32.7



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 3, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 16, 2005



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)




35
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13002]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Science and Technology Infrastructure; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Science and Technology 
Infrastructure (#1373).
    Date and Time: June 9, 1996; 7:30 p.m.-10:00 p.m.. June 10-12, 
1996, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Rooms 375 & 380, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; Gallery 1, Renaissance Hotel, 950 North 
Stafford Street, Arlington, VA 22203.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts, Director, Office of 
Science and Technology Infrastructure, Room 1270, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone (703) 306-1040.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Facilities component of the Academic Research Infrastructure 
Program.
    Reason for Closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
the Panel is reviewing proposal actions that will include privileged 
intellectual property and personal information that could harm 
individuals if they were disclosed. These matters are exempt under 5 
U.S.C. 552B(c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 20, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-13002 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Case 4:17-cr-01732-JGZ-DTF Document 91 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:17-cr-01732-JGZ-DTF Document 91 Filed 05/09/18 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:17-cr-01732-JGZ-DTF Document 91 Filed 05/09/18 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:17-cr-01732-JGZ-DTF Document 91 Filed 05/09/18 Page 4 of 4
#### 504 West 145th Street Corporation, Landlord, Appellant, *v.*Dewey Story, Tenant, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

September 15, 1955.

*Edward B. Eliezer*for appellant.

*Horace I. Gordon*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The tenant’s occupancy of the premises was without the landlord’s consent during the pendency of the protest proceedings by the landlord against the order made by *751the local rent administrator. The subsequent determination of the State Bent Administrator upon the landlord’s protest superseded that of the local rent administrator and had the same effect as if originally made by the latter. The tenant became liable for the full amount of the rent fixed by the State Bent Administrator for the months in question. The amendment to subdivision 2 of section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act (L. 1952, ch. 495) now permits the maintenance of summary proceedings upon default in payment of rent where the occupancy is ‘ ‘ with or without the permission of the landlord ’ ’. The contrary rule enunciated in *Tolk*v. *Cohen*(62 Misc. 230) and *Reiss*v. *Schlossman*(84 N. Y. S. 2d 717) is no longer applicable.

There is no dispute as to the total amount of rent due under the determination made by the State Bent Administrator. No waiver or estoppel can be invoked against the landlord because it retained but did not use checks forwarded by the tenant for the lesser amount of rent. *(Wasservogel*v. *Meyerowitz,*300 N. Y. 125.) The amount due through February, 1955 at $265.68.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order and judgment directed in favor of the landlord in the sum of $265.68, with costs. Warrant and execution are stayed for 10 days after entry of final order.

Hofstadter, Schreiber and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARC SAVOY,

Appellant,

v.

LARRY LAKE & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3816 

[January 14, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott R. Kerner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-

2016CA005588MB.

Mariano Gonzalez and Leonardo G. Renaud of the Law Offices of 

Gonzalez & Associates, P.A., Miramar, for appellant.

Bryan W. Black and Shirley Jean McEachern of Derrevere Stevens 

Black & Cozad, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and CONNER, JJ., CONCUR.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 111 (Friday, June 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-E-2079]


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; BRAVECTO; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) published a 
notice in the Federal Register of February 12, 2018. After review of a 
timely request for reconsideration by the applicant of the 
determination of the regulatory review period of the animal drug, 
BRAVECTO, in that notice, FDA has determined that a revision of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is warranted. This document presents 
the revised regulatory review period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory 
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 12, 2018 (83 FR 6033), in FR 
Doc. 2018-02761, in the first column, the first two paragraphs under 
the section ``II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period,'' the 
following correction is made on page 6034:
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
BRAVECTO is 1,054 days. Of this time, 1,016 days occurred during the 
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 38 days occurred 
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the 
following dates:
    1. The date an exemption under section 512(j) of the FD&C Act (21 
U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective: June 28, 2011. The applicant claims 
February 19, 2010, as the date the investigational new animal drug 
application (INAD) became effective. However, after consideration of 
additional information presented by the applicant in response to the 
Federal Register notice (83 FR 6033), FDA has determined that the start 
of the testing phase was June 28, 2011, which was the date the first 
major health or environmental effects test began.

    Dated: June 3, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12284 Filed 6-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Exhibit 13.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Rediff.com India Limited for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ajit Balakrishnan, the principal executive officer of Rediff.com India Limited,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Rediff.com India Limited.


Date:  September 29, 2006                     /s/ Ajit Balakrishnan
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Ajit Balakrishnan
                                               Chairman and Managing Director


         A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7397

KEIALTO MAURICE WALKER, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus JACK LEE, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-341-3) Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 19, 2005 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keialto Maurice Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Keialto Maurice Walker seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). * An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 447 

Recognizing the remarkable contributions of the American Council of Engineering Companies for its 100 years of service to the engineering industry 

and the Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Mr. SHULER (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the remarkable contributions of the American 

Council of Engineering Companies for its 100 years of 

service to the engineering industry and the Nation. 

Whereas the American Council of Engineering Companies 

(ACEC) and its thousands of member firms are celebrating the Council’s 100th anniversary in 2009; 

Whereas the ACEC is the oldest and largest business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more 

than 5,000 engineering firms that employ 500,000 professionals, engaged in a wide range of practices that propel our economy and ensure a high quality of life for all 

people in the United States; 

Whereas the ACEC represents engineers in private practice, 

who design the infrastructure, energy, and technological 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 447 IH 

projects that ensure our Nation enjoys the highest standard of living in the world and continues to compete successfully in the 21st century economy; 

Whereas the ACEC member firms have been responsible for 

many of the Nation’s most significant achievements over 

the past 100 years, including the roads, bridges, subways, 

airports, buildings, industrial facilities, and water systems that are the most advanced in the world; and 

Whereas the ACEC member firms have also been at the forefront of the environmental movement, cleaning up hazardous waste sites and incorporating sustainable solutions in infrastructure works: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the American Council of Engineering Compa3 nies for its 100 years of service. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 429 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 429

    Congratulating Jockey Calvin Borel for his victory at the 135th 
                            Kentucky Derby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2009

Mr. Melancon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Congratulating Jockey Calvin Borel for his victory at the 135th 
                            Kentucky Derby.

Whereas Calvin Borel, born and raised in St. Martin Parish, Louisiana, began 
        riding match horse races at the age of 8 in the State of Louisiana;
Whereas Mr. Borel began his professional career as a jockey at the age of 16;
Whereas Mr. Borel is known for his work ethic and, even while ranked as a 
        leading rider, often gallops horses and does stable chores for his 
        brother before working horses in the morning;
Whereas Mr. Borel won his second Kentucky Derby riding Mine That Bird after 
        riding Street Sense to victory in 2007;
Whereas, on May 2, 2009, Mr. Borel won the Kentucky Derby on Mine That Bird, a 
        50-1 long shot, a day after winning the Kentucky Oaks aboard favorite 
        Rachel Alexandra;
Whereas it was only the second time since 1993 that a jockey has won the Oaks-
        Derby combo and just the seventh jockey overall to accomplish this feat 
        in the same year; and
Whereas, on May 2, 2009, in 2 minutes and 2.17 seconds Mr. Borel and Mine That 
        Bird completed the race and placed first: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends Calvin Borel 
for his victory at the 135th Kentucky Derby.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12701]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3633]


Blenheim Expositions, Inc.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a 
Florida-based company, that produces franchise trade shows and 
expositions, from misrepresenting the sales, income or profits, or the 
success rate of franchise owners, unless it possesses and relies upon 
competent and reliable scientific evidence to support the claims. In 
addition, the respondent is prohibited from misrepresenting the 
validity, results, contents, conclusions, or interpretations of any 
survey, test, poll or study.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued December 22, 1995.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tom Cohn, FTC/H-238, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3532.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, October 12, 1995, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 60 FR 53186, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Blenheim Expositions, Inc., 
for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were 
given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12701 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
#### Paula WATSON, f/k/a Paula Williams, Respondent, v. Kevin E. JAMES, Appellant.

No. 64237.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 19, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 16, 1994.

*557Byron Cohen, Clayton, for appellant.

David 0. Kreuter, Clayton, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court’s order increasing his child support obligation to $408 per month per child. We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.-16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would have no precedential value; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.