alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Richard Smitten, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smitten Press: Local
Lore and Legends, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ RICHARD SMITTEN
---------------------------
Richard Smitten
CEO and CFO

November 10, 2005
Order filed January 14, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00778

- CV

____________ TAMMY DEWOLF, CHRIST INA DEWOLF, AMANDA D EWOLF AND

KAITLYN DEWOLF , Appellants

V. RICHIE KOHLER, ET AL , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 46416



### O R D E R

Th e clerk’s record in this appeal was due November 22, 2013, but it has not been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appel lant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On December 11 , 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangement s to pay for the record and2

provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or otherwise responded to this court’s notice

. Appellants are ordered to file th e clerk’s record in this appeal or before January 28, 2014, or the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP 

 

On May 15, 2002, I-many, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) terminated the engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP(“Andersen”) as its independent accountants as Andersen’s offices in the State of Massachusetts were to close effective June 30, 2002. The decision to terminate Andersen was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and theCompany’s Board of Directors. As recommended by the Company’s Audit Committee and the Company’s Board of Directors, the Board of Directors authorized and approved the Company’s engagement of Deloitte & Touche LLP as its newindependent accountants to serve as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal 2002 year. Deloitte & Touche LLP’s engagement became effective as of May 22, 2002, the date on which Deloitte & Touche LLP accepted theappointment. 

 

Andersen was the Company’s independent accountants. As aresult of the closing of Andersen, we were unable to obtain the consent to Andersen to the incorporation by reference in our registration statements on Form S-8 Nos. 333-86958, 333-64974, 333-60162, and 333-41362 and in our registration statementson Form S-3 Nos. 333-68924, 333-76716, 333-85044 and 333-88714 of the audit report of Andersen with respect to our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001. We have dispensed with the requirement under Section 7 of theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) to file the consent of Andersen in reliance on Rule 437(a) under the Securities Act. Because Andersen has not consented to the incorporation by reference of their report in theregistration statements identified above, purchasers of securities offered pursuant to those registration statements on or after the filing of this Form 10-K will not be able to recover against Andersen under Section 11 of the Securities Act for anyuntrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen and incorporated by reference in those financial statements or any omission to state a material fact required to be stated in those financialstatements.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: June 1, 2015

S15Y0830. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID P. RACHEL.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition filed by David

P. Rachel (State Bar No. 591601) seeking the voluntary suspension of his

license to practice law pending the outcome of an appeal of his criminal

convictions, seeBar Rule 4-106 (f) (1). Because we agree that such a suspension

is appropriate, we accept Rachel’s petition.

On October 8, 2014, David P. Rachel was convicted in the United States

District Court for the District of Arizona on one count of conspiracy and twelve

counts of money laundering, see 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (a), all felonies. Rachel, who

has been a member of the Bar since 2003, admits that his convictions constitute

violations of Rule 8.4 (a) (2) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), thereby subjecting him to

the provisions of Bar Rule 4-106. Stating his intent to appeal his convictions,

however, Rachel filed this petition for voluntary suspension of his license

pending the outcome of his appeal. TheBar has indicated that it has no objection
to Rachel’s petition. Based on our review of the record, we agree that the

petition should be granted. Accordingly, Rachel is hereby suspended from the

practice of law in this State until further order of this Court. He is reminded of

his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c). 

Petition for voluntary discipline accepted. Suspended until further

order of this Court. All the Justices concur.

2
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Rediff.com India Limited (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Swasti Bhowmick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 15, 2013



By:

/s/ Swasti BhowmickSwasti BhowmickChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 24665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12535]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 97 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 24665]]

                Executive Order 13002 of May 13, 1996

                
Termination of Combat Zone Designation in Vietnam 
                and Waters Adjacent Thereto

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 112(c)(3) of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 112(c)(3)), June 30, 
                1996, as of midnight thereof, is hereby designated as 
                the date of termination of combatant activities in the 
                zone comprised of the area described in Executive Order 
                No. 11216 of April 24, 1965.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    May 13, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96-12535
Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CAROLINA WATERWORKS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TAYLOR MADE GROUP, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

TAYLOR MADE PRODUCTS,

Defendant.

______________________ 

2014-1362

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of South Carolina in No. 2:12-cv-02568-DCN, 

Judge David C. Norton. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Carolina Waterworks, Inc. moves without opposition 

to withdraw its appeal.

Case: 14-1362 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 08/06/2014
2 CAROLINA WATERWORKS, INC. v. TAYLOR MADE GROUP, LLC

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 6, 2014

Case: 14-1362 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 08/06/2014
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11723]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; International Advisory Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the International Advisory Panel (Federal Advisory Committee on 
International Exhibitions Section) to the National Council on the Arts 
will meet on May 31, 1996 from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. in Room 716, at 
the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20506.
    This meeting is for the purpose of application evaluation, under 
the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including discussion of information given in confidence to the 
Agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of June 22, 1995, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsections (c) (4), (6) and 9(B) of section 552b of Title 
5, United States Code.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment 
for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call (202) 682-5691.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations, National 
Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 96-11723 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ralph F. Esposito, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-17-04325-PHX-NVW (ESW)

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett (Doc. 57) issued November 26, 2018, regarding 

Petitioner’s “Motion to Court to dismiss entire Petition ‘without prejudice” to refile 

unexhausted claims in state court or stay and abeyance to dismiss entire Petition” (Doc. 

55). The R&R recommends that the Motion be denied. The Magistrate Judge advised the 

parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 2 (citing Rule 

72(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). No objections were filed. 

 Because the parties did not file objections, the court need not review any of the 

Magistrate Judge’s determinations on dispositive matters. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any 

review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”). The absence of a 

timely objection also means that error may not be assigned on appeal to any defect in the 

rulings of the Magistrate Judge on any non-dispositive matters. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (“A 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

party may serve and file objections to the order within 14 days after being served with a 

copy [of the magistrate’s order]. A party may not assign as error a defect in the order not 

timely objected to.”); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174 (9th Cir. 1996); 

Phillips v. GMC, 289 F.3d 1117, 1120-21 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Notwithstanding the absence of an objection, the court has reviewed the R&R and 

finds that it is well taken. The court will accept the R&R and deny the Motion. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 

or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 57) is accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Petitioner’s “Motion to Court to dismiss 

entire Petition ‘without prejudice” to refile unexhausted claims in state court or stay and 

abeyance to dismiss entire Petition” (Doc. 55). 

Dated this 19th day of December, 2018.
#### Patricia J. APODACA, Appellant, v. James Michael APODACA, Respondent.

No. WD 50621.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 26, 1996.

Seth D. Shumaker, Lancaster, for appellant.

Rick Jackson, Jayne, Steele and Jackson, Kirksville, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Wife, Patricia Joan Apodaca, appeals from the decree of dissolution of her marriage with husband, James Michael Apodaca, wherein the trial court awarded primary custody of their son to husband, subject to rights of visitation in wife. She asserts the trial court’s determination was against the weight of the evidence and not in the child’s best interests.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘officially released’’ date.
All opinions are subjectto modificationandtechnical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or ConnecticutAppellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service andinthe Connecticut LawJournal andboundvolumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.

******************************************************LANE v

. COMMISSIONER OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION—
CONCURRENCE 

### ZARELLA, J., with whom McDONALD, J., joins, concurring. I agree with the majority’s general conclusions in this case. I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’sreliance onBlumbergAssociates Worldwide, Inc

. v. Brown &Brown ofConnecticut, Inc., 311 Conn. 123, 84 A.3d 840 (2014), for the proposition that the ‘‘[r]eview of an unpreserved claim may be appropriate

. . . when the minimal requirements forreview are met and

. . . the party who raised the unpreserved claim cannot prevail.’’ (Citation omitted; emphasis omitted; footnote omitted.) Id., 157–58; see footnotes 16 and 20 ofthe majorityopinion. Althoughthe majoritycorrectly cites and applies this principle, I believe in retrospect that reviewing an unpreserved claim on which a party cannot prevail makes no sense because an inability to prevail leaves the party raising the claim in exactly the

same position he would have been had the claim been deemed unreviewable. In addition, reviewing an unpreserved claim onwhich apartycannotprevail consumes valuablejudicial resources that could be better utilized to review properlypreserved claims. Accordingly, both logic andthis court’s well established interestin fosteringjudicialeconomysuggestthattheunpreservedclaim in the present case should not be reviewed.
August 22, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IRVIN HOLLIS FERREE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00286

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                  ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



By signing below, the Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i)
this report on Form 10-KSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 11th day of March 2005:




By: /s/ Paul Warkentin
--------------------------------
Paul Warkentin
President/CEO/Acting CFO
(Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ RANDAL B.
TOFTELAND   President and Chief Executive Officer
 /s/ GREGG A.
WALDON   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 377 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 377

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 14, 2009.
Whereas Armed Forces Day was created in 1949 in connection with the 
        consolidation of the military services in the Department of Defense;
Whereas the purpose of Armed Forces Day is to honor the men and women who are 
        serving in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard, 
        including the National Guard and Reserve components;
Whereas Armed Forces Day is celebrated on the third Saturday in May, which this 
        year is May 16, 2009;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces have performed tremendous service on behalf 
        of the United States;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces have been killed and injured in operations 
        to bring peace and stability in the name of democracy; and
Whereas all Americans express their recognition and gratitude for members of the 
        Armed Forces at home and abroad: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives, on the occasion of Armed Forces 
Day 2009--
            (1) honors and recognizes the service and sacrifice that members of 
        the Armed Forces and their families gave, and continue to give, to the 
        United States;
            (2) remains committed to supporting the members of the Armed Forces 
        and their families;
            (3) encourages Americans to show their support and appreciation for 
        members of the Armed Forces on Armed Forces Day;
            (4) commends the actions of private citizens and organizations who 
        volunteer to support America's wounded warriors; and
            (5) expresses the gratitude of the American people to the members of 
        the Armed Forces for their service on behalf of the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```