alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Remon M. LEE, Appellant. Remon LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 49206, WD 50537.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 23, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 27, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction after jury trial of one count of assault in the first degree, two counts of armed criminal action, and the denial of his post-conviction motion.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.25(b).
##### 



Exhibit 10.4
   th
 Autumlee pty Ltd Unit 206 Sun City Gold Coast HQW
  STWA, Inc. of 5125 Lankershim Boulevard North Hollywood
   
 in Taree Street   MudQeeraba BurleiQh   STWA Inc  $1462.00 AUD
 calendar Month November  th  2 years + 2 X 2 Year Option.  th
 15th
 Unit




---



##### 








---



##### 



/s/ Scott Whieldon
 /s/ A. Menzell
    /s/ John Kostic
 /s/ A Menzell




---



##### 



March 15th 2006
    LESSOR /s/ Scott Whieldon
    
    LESSEE /s/ John KosticWITNESS /s/ A Menzell
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                       |                                          |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                       |                                          |
| Date:                May 21, 2007 | By:                              | /s/ Christopher              J. LeClerc  |
|                              | Christopher                J. LeClerc      |
|                              | Principal                Financial Officer |

----
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00535- CV
David Rebolloso, Ap pellant

v. Terr y Cort ez- Vega, Appellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 1 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 15- 0062 06, H ONO RAB LE TO DD T. WO NG, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The appellate rec ord must include the cler k’s rec ord from the trial court. The cler k’s 1
rec ord in this cause was due in this Court on October 16, 2015, but no rec ord was filed. We rec eived notice from the Travis County cler k’s office on September 15, 2015, that appellant h as n ei t her paid nor made arr ang ement for the p aym en t of the rec ord. Nor has appellant filed an aff idavit of indig ence . 2 Under these circ umstances, this Court may dismiss the appea l for want of prosec ution. On October 19, 2015, we sent notice to appellant that the cler k’s rec ord was overdue 3 and that the appea l may be dismiss ed for want of prosec ution if appellant did not make arr ang ements

See Tex. R. App. P . 34.1, 34.5(a)
. 1 See id. R. 20.1(2). 2 See id. R. 37.3(b). 3for t h e re co rd and submit a status repor t to this Court on or befor e October 29, 2015. To date, appellant has not responde d in any way and the cler k’s rec ord has not be en filed. Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appe al for w ant of prose cution. 4

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Nove mber 10, 2015

See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b) , (c)
. 4 2
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.87


                      AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO PROMISSORY NOTE

         Reference is made to that $56,017,698.87 Promissory Note of STAR
TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation with its chief executive
offices located at 223 East De La Guerra, Santa Barbara, California, 93101
(together with its successors and assigns, the "Maker"), effective February
3, 2000 (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to
time, including any extensions, refinancings, refundings or renewals thereof
in whole or in part, collectively, the "Note"), payable to MCI WORLDCOM
NETWORK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation with offices located at 6929
N. Lakewood Avenue, Mail Drop 5.2-510, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74117 (the "Holder").
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Note to the contrary, from and
after the date hereof, unless sooner accelerated, the Note shall mature on or
before the earlier to occur of (such date being referred to herein as the
"Maturity Date"): (a) termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
February 11, 2000, by and between the Maker, STI Merger Co. and World Access,
Inc. (the "Merger Agreement"); (b) consummation of the merger transaction
contemplated by the Merger Agreement; or (c) December 15, 2000, without
notice or presentment. Nothing herein shall be considered or construed to be
an agreement by Holder to extend the Maturity Date beyond December 15, 2000.

         When attached to the Note, this Amendment No. 3 shall become a part
of the Note, and the terms and provisions of the Note as modified by this
Amendment No. 3 shall remain in full force and effect.


Date as of: October 27, 2000

ATTEST:                                STAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS,
                                       INC.

By:                                    By:
   -------------------------------        -------------------------------

Name:                                  Name:
     -----------------------------          -----------------------------

Title:                                 Title:
      ----------------------------           ----------------------------

                                       Agreed to and Accepted By:


ATTEST:                                MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK
                                       SERVICES, INC.

By:                                    By:
   -------------------------------        -------------------------------

Name:                                  Name:
     -----------------------------          -----------------------------

Title:                                 Title:
      ----------------------------           ----------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12696]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Regulatory Guide; Issuance, Availability

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a revision to a guide 
in its Regulatory Guide Series. This series has been developed to 
describe and make available to the public such information as methods 
acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the 
Commission's regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating 
specific problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the staff 
in its review of applications for permits and licenses.
    Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.82, ``Water Sources for Long-Term 
Recirculation Cooling Following a Loss-of-Coolant Accident,'' has been 
revised to provide current guidance on methods acceptable to the NRC 
staff for meeting the Commission's requirements with respect to the 
sumps and suppression pools that perform the functions of water sources 
for emergency core cooling, containment heat removal, and containment 
atmosphere cleanup. This guide also updates the guidance on evaluating 
blockage by debris in the sumps and suppression pools of boiling water 
nuclear power reactors.
    Comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in 
guides currently being developed or improvements in all published 
guides are encouraged at any time. Written comments may be submitted to 
the Rules Review and Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of 
Information and Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
    Regulatory guides are available for inspection at the Commission's 
Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC. Single copies 
of regulatory guides may be obtained free of charge by writing the 
Office of Administration, Attention: Distribution and Services Section, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by 
fax at (301) 415-2260. Issued guides may also be purchased from the 
National Technical Information Service on a standing order basis. 
Details on this service may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port 
Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Regulatory guides are not 
copyrighted, and Commission approval is not required to reproduce them.

(5 U.S.C. 552(a))

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of May 1996.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Themis P. Speis,
Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 96-12696 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11555]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Departmenf of the Army
Corps of Engineers


Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB)

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting.


    Name of Committee: Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB).
    Dates of Meeting: June 11-12, 1996
    Place: U.S. Grant Hotel, San Diego, California
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (June 11, 1996); 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 
p.m. (June 12, 1996).


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Inquiries and notice of intent to attend the meeting may be addressed 
to Colonel Bruce K. Howard, Executive Secretary, Coastal Engineering 
Research Board, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 3909 
Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180-6119.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Theme: The Direction of Coastal Engineering in the Corps and the 
Resulting Impact on Research and Development (R&D).
    Proposed Agenda: The session on June 11 will consist of a review of 
CERB business, presentations on the Marine Board Report and a review of 
the Report to OMB on Shore Protection, and presentations pertaining to 
the theme, such as the Corps' direction, coastal engineering R&D, 
judicial impacts, Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the dredging 
industry, academia, and private industry.
    On the morning of June 12, there will be presentations from four 
action groups formed from the CERB Task Force. The reports consist of 
the Strategic Plan, the Technical Advisory Committee, the Public 
Affairs (PAO) Plan, and Critical Linkages. These presentations will be 
followed by panel presentations concerning California activities, 
specifically presentations on the Coast of California Study, 
cooperative agreement, SANDAG, California Coastal Commission, and the 
Navy Project. The after session will consist of a projects overview and 
will also include recommendations by members of the Board.
    This meeting is open to the public; participation by the public is 
scheduled for 2:30 p.m. on June 12.
    The entire meeting is open to the public subject to the following:
    1. Since seating capacity of the meeting room is limited, advance 
notice of intent to attend, although not required, is requested in 
order to assure adequate arrangements.
    2. Oral participation by public attendees is encouraged during the 
time scheduled on the agenda; written statements may by submitted prior 
to the meeting or up to 30 days after the meeting.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11555 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-PU-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 of ASG Consolidated LLC (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/    BERNT O.
BODALName:

Bernt O. BodalTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

August 11, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to ASG Consolidated LLC and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21499-21500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11767]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management


National Skill Standards Board; Notice of Open Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and 
Management, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Skill Students Board was established by an Act of 
Congress, the Goals 2000: Educate America Act of 1994, Title V, Pub L. 
103-227. The 27-member National Skill Standards Board will serve as a 
catalyst and be responsible for the development and implementation of a 
national system of voluntary skill standards and certification through 
voluntary partnerships which have the full and balanced participation 
of business, industry, labor, education and other key groups.

    Time and Place: The meeting will be held from 8:00 a.m. to 
appproximately 11:30 a.m. on Friday, May 31, 1996, in the Mt. Vernon 
Salon A & B, 2nd Floor of the Madison Hotel at 15th & M Streets N.W, 
Washington, D.C.

[[Page 21500]]

    Agenda: The agenda for the Board Meeting will include discussion 
of: Reports about NSSB focus groups and public hearings, and a panel 
discussion of the Palisades Education Summit.
    Public Participation: The meeting from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 
is open to the public. Seating is limited and will be available on a 
first-come, first-served basis. Seats will be reserved for the 
media. Disabled individuals should contact Claire Grenewald at (202) 
254-8628, if special accommodations are needed.
    For Further Information Contact: Sally Conway, NSSB Outreach 
Director, at (202) 254-8628.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 6th day of May 1996.
Judy Gray,
Executive Director, National Skill Standards Board.
[FR Doc. 96-11767 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12873]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Duty-Free Entry of 
Scientific Instrument

    Shriners Hospital has withdrawn Docket Number 95-077, an 
application for duty-free entry of a 3-Dimensional Motion Analyzer 
System, Model VICON 370. We have discontinued processing in accordance 
with Section 301.5(g) of 15 CFR part 301.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs.
[FR Doc. 96-12873 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         OF FLAG TELECOM GROUP LIMITED

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the report on Amendment No. 1
to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the "Form 10-K/A") for the year ended December
31, 2002 of FLAG Telecom Group Limited (the "Issuer").

I, Alexander Gersh, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that:

        (i) the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
    13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

        (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Issuer.

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and
will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
Dated: August 14, 2003.

                                               /s/ Alexander Gersh
                                               --------------------------------------------
                                               Name: Alexander Gersh
</Table>
#### William K. BROWNFIELD, Respondent, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Appellants, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents. William K. BROWNFIELD, Appellant, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Respondents, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents.

Nos. WD 50748, WD 50787.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 26, 1996.

Andrew C. Webb, Sedalia, for appellant/respondent.

Gary William Smith, Sedalia, for respondents/appellants.

Julius F. Wall, Clinton, for respondents.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment of trial court denying claim for conversion against respondent and cross-appellant, Ralph David Brownfield. Cross-appellants Ralph David Brownfield and Lorene Brownfield appeal judgment of the trial court finding that William Brownfield had a contractual right to continued use of well water from the property of Ralph David and Lorene Brownfield.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19641-19642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10946]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Palm Beach Company; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility 
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 6, 1995, applicable 
to all workers of Palm Beach Company located in Eastaboga, Alabama. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 1996 (61 FR 
2537).
    At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers at the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in employment related to the production of men's suits. New information 
shows that worker separations have occurred at the subject firm's 
production facilities in Knoxville, Tennessee, and Somerset and 
Erlanger, Kentucky. Based on these new findings, the Department is 
amending the certification to cover workers of Palm Beach Company at 
those facilities.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Palm Beach Company who were adversely affected by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,600 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Palm Beach Company, Eastaboga, Alabama (TA-W-
31,600); Knoxville, Tennessee (TA-W-31,600A);

[[Page 19642]]

Somerset, Kentucky (TA-W-31,600B) and Erlanger, Kentucky (TA-W-
31,600C) who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after October 20, 1994 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 8th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-10946 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-30-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-60308 Summary Calendar

__________________

ROMAIN P. WILSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN H. DALTON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

(1:93-CV-621-GR)

______________________________________________

February 14, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Romain P. Wilso n appeals from a summary judgment of the

district court which denied her claim based on Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964. We affirm.

It is undisputed that Wilson did not file her complaint in the

district court until nearly two years after she received notice2

concerning the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s final

decision denying her relief and informing her of her right to file

suit within ninety (90) calendar days. On appeal, Wilson relies on

a number of matters that she claims should estop the district court

from granting summary judgment or that should equitably toll the

ninety-day limitation period. Her arguments are not meritorious.

Moreover, we will not consider them on appeal as such arguments

were not advanced in the district court in response to the

Secretary’s motion for summary judgment. The district court

correctly granted summary judgment on the issues before it, and

accordingly the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.