alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0502

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ROGER MICHAEL KEECH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 13, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 5 2024

02/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0502
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BMX Development Corp. for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean A. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify that:
 
 *   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Dean A. Stewart
 Dean A. Stewart
 Chief Financial Officer, Controller
 
 November 9, 2010
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Dr. Panos Kontzalis and Harvey Lalach, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Anavex Life Sciences Corp.                                                             |

Dated:  August 13, 2007

 

/s/ Dr. Panos Kontzalis

Dr. Panos Kontzalis, CEO

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ Harvey Lalach

Harvey Lalach

President, CFO and Secretary

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and will be retained by Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 10.16**[LETTERHEAD OF LAS VEGAS GAMING, INC.][Date][Name of Employee]Dear ___________:I would like to extend this formal offer for you to join LVGI’s management team. As                     of LVGI, you will be responsible for                                         . Additionally,as a member of the senior management team, you will be expected to participate in other businessfunctions including but not limited to,                     . We offer you the followingcompensation package: **•**                      annual salary.  **•**                      warrants of LVGI common stock at a strike price of $___, ___% vesting and___year life.  **•** Benefits commensurate with other executives at LVGI.  **•** Minimum of 6 months severance should LVGI decide that it no longer needs your services.We would like for you to officially report to work on                     . This contract will supersedeall other contracts between us.If you accept this offer in its entirety, please sign below.Respectfully, Russ R. Roth
#### William HERRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42545.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 3, 1990.

J. Bryan Allee, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of motion under Rule 27.26 (repealed January 1, 1988).

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 13



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, DC 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

         Mr. K.V. Kamath, the Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, and
Ms. Vishakha Mulye, the Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer of ICICI Bank
Limited, each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

         1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

         2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of ICICI Bank Limited.


Date: September 28, 2006


                                             /s/ K.V. Kamath
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: Mr. K.V. Kamath
                                             Managing Director & Chief
                                             Executive Officer


                                             /s/ Vishakha Mulye
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: Ms. Vishakha Mulye
                                             Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Troy Luke Sellers, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-17-8276-PCT-JZB

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Probation. The

issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the Petition and file in

determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure his appearance at future proceedings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 28th day of December, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12799]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 960129019-6019-01; I.D. 051696A]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Pacific 
Ocean Perch in the Western Aleutian District

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting retention of Pacific ocean perch in the 
Western Aleutian District of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
management area (BSAI). NMFS is requiring that catches of Pacific ocean 
perch in the Western Aleutian District be treated in the same manner as 
prohibited species and discarded at sea with a minimum of injury. This 
action is necessary because the Pacific ocean perch total allowable 
catch (TAC) in the Western Aleutian District has been caught.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), May 19, 1996, 
until 12 midnight A.l.t., December 31, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Furuness, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by the NMFS according to the Fishery 
Management Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and 
Aleutian Islands Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations 
implementing the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    In accordance with Sec. 675.20 (a)(7)(ii), the Pacific ocean perch 
TAC for the Western Aleutian District was established by the Final 1996 
Harvest Specifications of Groundfish (61 FR 4311, February 5, 1996), 
and increased by an apportionment from the reserve (61 FR 16085, April 
11, 1996) to 6,050 metric tons (mt).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 675.20(a)(9), that the TAC for Pacific ocean perch in the 
Western Aleutian District has been reached. Therefore, NMFS is 
requiring that further catches of Pacific ocean perch in the Western 
Aleutian District be treated as prohibited species in accordance with 
Sec. 675.20(c)(3).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 675.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 16, 1996.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-12799 Filed 5-17-96; 1:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
CLERK OF TH E SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. BRowN 

BY: 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 83340 

F 

JUN 2otz 

EN( 

NEXNOVO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., 

F/K/A DWS TECHNOLOGY 

(SHENZHEN) CO., 

Appellant, 

vs. 

MURPHY & CO., LLP, 

Res e ondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, 

this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney 

fees. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge 

Paul M. Haire, Settlement Judge 

Dziminski Law Group 

Hone Law 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

tor 19-17 2-2- 07260
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION


OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Rick
H. Luk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




I, Yong
Xu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




By:
                  /s/
      Rick H. LukRick
      H. LukChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                    Officer)By:
                  /s/
      Yong XuYong
      XuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




October 27,
2010
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**I, Gregg A. Waldon, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SoftBrands, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ GREGG A. WALDON
**Schedule
      10.20**


Holders








1.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of PFK Acquisition Group, LLC, dated February
      21,
      2006.





2.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of Alfred F. Bracher, III, dated February 14,
      2006.





3.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of Howard Goldberg, dated March 13,
      2006.





4.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of Thomas A. Nicolette, dated March 24,
      2006.





5.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of Real Path, Inc., dated February 14,
      2006.





6.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of Robert Schachter Trust, Diane Schachter,
      Trustee, dated February 7, 2006.





7.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of Harvey Goldberg, dated March 24,
      2006.





8.  Warrant,
      issued by the Company in favor of Larry Chimerine, dated March 21,
      2006.
#### Cherylee Jean JOHNSON, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Larry Dale JOHNSON, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 62213.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 16, 1993.

James J. Johnson, Chesterfield, for respondent-appellant.

Robert Alan Hutton, Jr., Clayton, for petitioner-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a motion to modify a previous decree of dissolution, a motion for contempt and a motion for revival of judgment. Respondent filed a cross-motion to modify the decree of dissolution. After a hearing, the court denied the appellant’s motions and respondent’s motion and awarded respondent her attorney’s fee and costs of litigation. Court costs were taxed to appellant. From this judgment, appellant appealed.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. Our standard of review is governed by *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.1976). We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### Martin Thomas SCHWEINLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 06-93-00101-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.

March 26, 1996.

*369Robert G. Turner, Turner & Gotlieb, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Dist. Atty., Timothy G. Taft, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harris County, Houston, for appellee.

Before CORNELIUS, C.J., and BLEIL and GRANT, JJ.

OPINION ON REMAND

GRANT, Justice.

Martin Thomas Schweinle appeals his conviction of aggravated kidnapping, for which he was sentenced to fifteen years’ confinement. On original submission, we affirmed his conviction, holding, *inter alia,*that the lesser included offense of false imprisonment was not raised by the evidence. *Schweinle v. State,*893 S.W.2d 708, 715 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1995). The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed our judgment on this point and remanded the case to this Court to conduct a harm analysis pursuant of TexCode CRiM. PROcAnn. art. 36.19 (Vernon 1981). *Schweinle v. State,*915 S.W.2d 17, 20 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).

The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that a judgment shall not be reversed for an error in a jury charge “unless the error appearing from the record was calculated to injure the rights of [the] defendant, or unless it appears from the record that the defendant has not had a fair and impartial trial.” Tex.Code CrimProcAnn. art. 36.19. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that, under this rule, the degree of harm required to cause any individual case to be reversed depends upon whether the error was properly preserved in the trial court. *Gibson v. State,*726 S.W.2d 129, 133 (Tex.Crim.App.1987). If the error was properly preserved at trial, any harm, regardless of its degree, is sufficient to require reversal of the conviction. *Gibson,*726 S.W.2d at 133; *Arline v. State,*721 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (stating that “[c]ases involving preserved charging error will be affirmed only if *no*harm has occurred”).

In the present case, Schweinle properly preserved this error by timely requesting an instruction on false imprisonment. Accordingly, any harm resulting from the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on false imprisonment requires a reversal. *See Gibson,*726 S.W.2d at 133. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that there was evidence in this case sufficient to require such an instruction. *Schweinle,*915 S.W.2d at 20. Therefore, the jury should have been afford*370ed an opportunity to decide whether Schweinle committed false imprisonment. Because the jury was not given this opportunity, we cannot say that no harm resulted from the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on false imprisonment.

This case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for a new trial.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13155]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 042996E]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of photography permit no. 993 (P597).

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Mr. Michael Kundu, Arcturus 
Adventure Communications, 1026-A 56th Street SE, Everett, WA 98203, has 
been issued a permit to take by Level B harassment several species of 
non-threatened, non-endangered marine mammals for purposes of 
commercial photography.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Director, Alaska Region, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668 
(907/586-7221); and
    Director, Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE, BIN 
C15700, Bldg. 1, Seattle, WA 98115-0070 (206/526-6150).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 15, 1995, notice was published 
in the Federal Register (60 FR 57400) that the above-named applicant 
had submitted a request for a permit to take several species of marine 
mammals by Level B harassment during the course of commercial 
photographic activities. The requested permit has been issued, under 
the authority of section 104(c)(6) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act 
of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.).

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-13155 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-F