alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.5

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. II

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Florida Holding Co. II (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 13, 2007



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPrincipal Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6059

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNY MONTANA HOLTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (4:98-cr-00009; 4:06-cv-00013)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenny Montana Holton, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kenny Montana Holton seeks to appeal the district court’s

order construing his motion to amend the presentence report as a

successive motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and

dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Holton has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Holton’s motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Holton’s motion

for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with Amendment No. 1 the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2009(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, I Joseph Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Joseph Driscoll     |                  |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|
| Joseph Driscoll         | August 18,  2009 |
| Chief Financial Officer |                  |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") Kenneth Bosket, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Kenneth BosketKenneth
      Bosket
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Dated:
      January 31, 2011





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.







CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report), Lowell Holden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Lowell HoldenLowell
      Holden
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                Dated:
      January 31, 2011
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-307-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.N.T. AND B.L.T., 

CHILDREN	

	------------

	FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On September 10, 2007, we notified Appellant T.L.T. that we were concerned this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared that her notice of appeal was not timely filed.  We stated that the appeal might be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.  Although Appellant filed a response, it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.

	On May 15, 2007, the trial court signed an order modifying child custody.  Appellant filed a motion for new trial on June 12, 2007, which extended the appellate deadline for filing a notice of appeal until August 13, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).  However, Appellant did not file her notice of appeal until September 4, 2007.

	The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely-filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (holding that once extension period has passed, a party can no longer invoke an appellate court’s jurisdiction).

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

									PER CURIAM

PANEL D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: October 4, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12474]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 22, 1996.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

BOARD BRIEFING: .

    1. Insurance Fund Report.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: .

    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Open Meeting.
    2. charter Application from the Proposed Wendell Phillips Community 
Development Federal Credit Union, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    3. Appeal of Regional Director's Denial of a Field of Membership 
Expansion Request from Insurance Employee Federal Credit Union.
    4. Proposed Rule: Part 704, NCUA's rules and Regulations, Corporate 
Credit Unions.

RECESS: 10:45 a.m..

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 22, 1996.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 4047, 1775 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 
22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Closed Meetings.
    2. Appeal from a Credit Union of a Federal Credit Union's Field of 
Membership Expansion. Closed pursuant to exemption (8).
    3. Request from A Federal Credit Union for a Low-Income Community 
Area Charter Expansion. Closed pursuant to exemption (8).
    4. Request from a Credit Union to Convert to a Federal Community 
Charter. Closed pursuant to exemption (8).
    5. Request from a Federal Credit Union to Convert to a Community 
Charter. Closed pursuant to exemptions (8) and (9) (B).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hattie Ulan, Acting Secretary of the 
Board, Telephone (703) 518-6300.
Hattie Ulan,
Acting Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-12474 Filed 5-14-96; 2:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
```
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Honorsble **WIG.** Burwltz Cri3tAnal

District Attorney Creeg County Longview, 'I'exea Dear Sir: &roh 18, 1939

ta an4 queetionr ati delitsred **the** YelNlor'8 the county~

Cl Btatutiir; after pkoridlnga or, ovpr thb rfrst endor* li.m~,~

and any~oharacter
, oontalns the
s&on shkll net apply to r00iii0n8 0r this renswals or~&tanslons 0r any notes ,orob&igations, and speolrfaally

hall sot apply to refundingof existingbonds or obfigations. Awl providing further this Seotion shell not apgly to notes and obligationsor instrumentsseburingsame taken **by ’**  **hr on** Hon. *. Eurufltz, haroh 18, 1959, Page 2 bahalr of the Unite6 States or any oorporatsa@snay or lnetrumentallty of the United 

### StatonGovernment in oarrylng out a governmental purpoaa es expr888sd In any Aot or the Congress or the united State8.w Under the meager raota submitted the deetl reoening the vendor*s lien in this inetsnoedoelr not rall within any of the sxaspt i0n1. The vandorgs lien is not one of renew81 or exten8ion. *or do the ractr ahow that any of the lnetrruents were take8 by or on behalf ai any agency or lnrtrumentality of the United btate8 Go7slnmexit.



### A8stlbBltt.ed

to us, the Q808twB

i8 mBswore6

in the l r r imtivo . Teur# 7 o r y t r u l y WW H i T a a r n u r . O P~
**Exhibit
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Soyodo Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December
      31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Chu Pi Yun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the SecuritiesExchange
                Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      and
      is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      of
      the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.




Date:April
                11, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/ Chu
                Pi YunChu
                Pi Yun
              Chief
                Financial Officer (principal
              financial
                and accounting officer)
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5947 

AN ACT 

To provide for the rescission of certain waivers and licenses 

relating to Iran, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5947 EH

1 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF CERTAIN WAIVERS AND LI2 CENSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—On the date of enactment of this 

4 Act, the following measures shall be terminated: 

5 (1) The waiver exercised on the pursuant to 

6 section 1245(d)(5) of the National Defense Author7 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 and sections 

8 1244(i) and 1247(f) of the Iran Freedom and 

9 Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 and transmitted 

10 to Congress on September 11, 2023, for the transfer 

11 of certain funds from the Republic of Korea to 

12 Qatar. 

13 (2) Any general or specific license issued by the 

14 Office of Foreign Assets Control at the Department 

15 of the Treasury directly or indirectly related to the 

16 funds cited in paragraph (1). 

17 (b) LIMITATION.—The President may not reissue any 

18 new waiver or license described in paragraph (1) or (2) 

19 of subsection (a) for the same or similar purposes. 

20 SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN LI21 CENSES. 

22 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on and 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President 

24 may not— 

25 (1) exercise the waiver authority described in 

26 section 1245(d)(5) of the National Defense Author-
3 

•HR 5947 EH

1 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 and sections 

2 1244(i) and 1247(f) of the Iran Freedom and 

3 Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 permitting the 

4 Government of Iran or any Iranian person access to 

5 any account established or maintained pursuant to 

6 or in accordance with section 1245(d)(4)(D)(ii)(II) 

7 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

8 Year 2012; or 

9 (2) issue a general or specific license, frequently 

10 asked question, or any other licensing action or 

11 guidance permitting the Government of Iran or any 

12 Iranian person access to or to benefit directly or in13 directly from any account established pursuant to or 

14 in accordance with any account described in 

15 1245(d)(4)(D)(ii)(II) of the National Defense Au16 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 17, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5947 

AN ACT 

To provide for the rescission of certain waivers and 

licenses relating to Iran, and for other purposes.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8's No. 333-32326 and No. 333-95757) pertaining to the Travelocity
Holdings, Inc. 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Travelocity.com LP 1999
Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Travelocity Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan and the Travelocity.com LP Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated
January 15, 2001, except for Note 15, as to which the date is March 12, 2001,
with respect to the financial statements of Travelocity.com Inc. included in the
Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

July 31, 2001
Dallas, Texas
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13270]




[[Page 26550]]

[RI 25-15]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Review of a Revised 
Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management has submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for clearance of a revised information collection. RI 
25-15, Notice of Change In Student's Status, is used to collect 
sufficient information from adult children of deceased Federal 
employees or annuitants to assure that the child continues to be 
eligible for payments from OPM.
    We estimate 2,500 certifications will be processed annually. Each 
form takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. The annual estimated 
burden is 417 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b9beb5b2a1a1bcbd93beb2babffdbca3befdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e3433383f2c2c31301e333f373270312e3370393128">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by no later than 
June 27, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW, Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415
    and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management & Budget, New Executive Office Building, 
NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT:
Mary Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 96-13270 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006

of WorldSpace, Inc.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of WorldSpace, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                  |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/    SRIDHAR
GANESAN                                          
|                      |  | Sridhar Ganesan Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
##### 



Exhibit 10.40
   CH-4070
    Re:
    Support
    of
    CellCept®
    activities outside the U.S. (the ROW) between
    Aspreva Pharmaceuticals SA (Aspreva), and F.
    Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
    (collectively, Roche)    ®
  Clinical Development.
  ROW Commercialization.
  General.
    Aspreva Pharmaceuticals SA

Tel:+41 (0)32 720 0550Rue des Beaux-Arts 8

Fax:+41 (0)32 720 0559Case postale 16112001 Neuchâtel, Switzerland

VAT Registration Nr. 622 567www.aspreva.com    Certain
    confidential information contained in this document, marked by
    brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
    Rule 24b-2
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 1




---



##### 



Aspreva Pharmaceuticals SA
  By:
    /s/  John
    A. Parkinson      F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  By:
    /s/  Stefan
    Arnold   Title:
    Attorney at Law  F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  By:
    /s/  W.
    M. Burns   Title:
    CEO Pharma Division, Roche  Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
  By:
    /s/  
    Gary J. Zieziula   Title:
    V. P. Commercial Operations     Certain
    confidential information contained in this document, marked by
    brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
    Rule 24b-2
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 2




---



##### 



Exhibit A
    [ * ]
  Certain
    confidential information contained in this document, marked by
    brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
    Rule 24b-2
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** 71 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 1995), opinion clarified , 77 F.3d 811 (5th Cir. 1996).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10162 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:92-CR-25-1-Y

- - - - - - - - - - November 20, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael Claude Johnson appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release. Johnson argues that the attestation affixed to a positive urinalysis report failed to comply with the requirements set forth in United States v. Grandlund ** and that the district court committed reversible error by admitting the report into evidence.No. 98-10162 -2- Even if the district court erred in admitting the short-form attestation, such error was harmless. See F ED . R. C RIM . P. 52(a). The report of the January urinalysis was not the only evidence that Johnson violated the conditions of his supervised release. At the original revocation hearing, Johnson pleaded “true” to three allegations of drug use, and there is no indication that he moved to withdraw that plea. The district court’s judgment revoking Johnson’s supervised release is AFFIRMED.