alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6998

THURMAN VAN LILLY, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. STAN BURTT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:07-cv-00999-JFA)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurman Van Lilly, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Thurman Van Lilly seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and motion to reconsider that denial. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. The time limits for noting an appeal in a civil case are set forth in Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which effectuates 28 U.S.C. § 2107 (2000). See

Bowles v. Russell , 127 S. Ct. 2360, 2363 (2007). Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). A failure to file a notice of appeal in accordance with § 2107 and Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction. Bowles , 127 S.

Ct. at 2366. The district court’s order was entered on its docket on May 6, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, * on June 7, 2008, thirty-two days later. Because Lilly failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the

* See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

23 appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Lee Roy Brown #1027084 3001 S. Emily Drive McConnell Unit Beeville, Texas 78102 

# CoH.Wg-OZ ,OLf

March 12, 2015 RE: Trial CT NO: WOl-00206 Dear Sir or Ma'am, 

### Could I please have a copy of the court docket concerning the Trial CT NO: WOl-00206. "I Wave included a SASE to expedite the process.



## RECEIVEDIN COURTOf"rPMNALAPPFALS 13 '""5 

## elAlcostaCierh Sincerely, 

## Lee/ROy Brawn #1027084
#### CAPITAL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. JCDM, INC., Appellant, and David Howe, Defendant.

No. WD 49151.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 15, 1994.

James W. Humphrey, Jr., Kansas City, for appellant.

John G. Schultz, Kansas City, for respondent.

*639Before SPINDEN, P.J., FENNER, C.J., and ELLIS, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

JCDM, Inc., appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Capitol Indemnity Corporation in the latter’s suit for declaratory judgment. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.14(b).
**ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT**

**TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**ART WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

 

Pursuant to the provisions of Delaware General Corporation Law, the Undersigned Corporation adopts the following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.

 

|   | 1. | The following amendment of the Articles of Incorporation was adopted by |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The shareholder consent on May 23, 2002, said articles are hereby 

Amended and shall read as follows:

 

**Article I**

**Name**

 

|   | The name of the corporation is ISSG, INC. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

|   | 2. | The number of shares outstanding at the time of adoption was 1,632,637; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

And the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was the same.

 

|   | 3. | The number of shares represented at the meeting of the shareholders was |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

892,550.  All shares voted in favor of the amendment.  The shares represented a majority of the issued and outstanding shares.  There were no shares voting against the amendment.

 

 

 Effective the 25th day of July 2002

 

 

|   | /s/ Robert Callender                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert Callender                                                                                                                             |
|   | President                                                                                                                                    |
|        |                                                                                                                                              |

 

 

 

|   | /s/ Westley Idol                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Westley Idol                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  
 

Secretary

  |
H. Res. 329 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 27, 2009. 

Whereas the explosion of the SS Sultana on April 27, 1865, 

is considered the worst maritime disaster in American 

history; 

Whereas the steamboat ship SS Sultana exploded on the Mississippi River 7 miles north of Memphis, Tennessee, at 

2:00 a.m.; 

Whereas roughly 1,800 of the 2,400 passengers lost their 

lives in the tragedy; 

Whereas 2,000 passengers on the SS Sultana at the time of 

the explosion were Union prisoners of war recently released from the Confederate Andersonville and Cahaba 

Prison Camps in Alabama; 

Whereas several of the former prisoners of war were suffering 

from disease and extreme malnutrition caused by the 

overcrowded and unsanitary conditions at the prison 

camps; 

Whereas the explosion was presumed to have been caused by 

a defective boiler trying to overcome the current of the 

Mississippi River; 

Whereas the enormous loss of life was attributed to an overcrowded vessel caused in part by poor oversight on behalf 
2 

•HRES 329 EH 

of the Union commanding officers responsible for the release of the prisoners of war; 

Whereas up to 300 of the initial survivors of the explosion 

later died from burns, hypothermia, or exposure; 

Whereas then Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton stated in 

his annual report for 1865 that the loss of ‘‘over 1200 

officers and soldiers—a loss greatly increased . . . by an 

improper and unnecessary overloading of the boat’’; 

Whereas only one of the several individuals responsible for 

the conditions of the steamer or the overcrowding of the 

vessel which contributed to the tragedy and large loss of 

life was ever prosecuted; and 

Whereas the disaster received little attention in the newspapers or magazines of the time and is scarcely remembered today: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the 144-year anniversary of the tragic accident of the steamboat ship SS Sultana; 

(2) honors the memory of the soldiers and passengers who lost their lives in this disaster; 

(3) regrets the lack of military and civilian oversight that led to the explosion and tremendous loss of 

life; and 
3 

•HRES 329 EH 

(4) rededicates itself to honoring all our veterans 

and military families with the highest level of support in 

quality resources, equipment and services. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
##### 



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
  Jurisdiction ofName
    
    Organization
    
    OwnershipDDi Intermediate Holdings
Corp.
    
    California
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Corp.DDi Capital Corp.
    
    California
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Intermediate Holdings Corp.Dynamic Details, Incorporated
    
    California
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Capital Corp.DDi Sales Corp.
    
    Delaware
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, IncorporatedSovereign Circuits, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, IncorporatedSovereign
Flex Products, LLC
    
    Ohio
    
    100% directly owned by Sovereign
Circuits, Inc.DDi Canada Acquisition Corp.
    
    Ontario, Canada
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, IncorporatedDynamic Details Canada, Inc.
    
    Ontario, Canada
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Canada Acquisition Corp.Laminate Technology Corp.
    
    Delaware
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, IncorporatedDynamic Details Incorporated, 
Silicon Valley
    
    Delaware
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, IncorporatedDynamic Details Incorporated, 
Colorado Springs
    
    Colorado
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, IncorporatedDynamic Details Texas, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details, IncorporatedDDi-Texas Intermediate
Holdings II, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details Texas, LLCDDi-Texas Intermediate
Partners II, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    100% directly owned by Dynamic Details Texas, LLCDynamic Details, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    99% owned by DDi-Texas Intermediate Partners II, LLC
and 1% owned by DDi-Texas Intermediate Holdings II,
LLCDDi Europe Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Corp.DDi Group Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Europe LimitedDDi Tolworth Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Group LimitedDDi Precision Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Group LimitedDDi Marlow Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100% directly owned by DDi Europe Limited
#### In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Petitioner, against Lilco Mfg. Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

May 3, 1956.

*779
      *David K. Kadane*for petitioner.

*C. Malcolm Dowsey*for respondent.

David Kusnetz, J.

This is a summary application under section 964 of the Penal Law for an injunction restraining the respondent from using the name “ Lilco ” or any simulation, derivation or approximation thereof in connection with its business. The petitioner is a public service corporation organized in 1910 and services all of Nassau and Suffolk Counties and the Rockaway Peninsula in Queens County. In addition to the sale of gas and electricity, petitioner also sells a wide variety of appliances for use in homes and in industrial and commercial establishments. For some period of time, the petitioner has been using in connection with its business the name “ Lilco ”, a contraction of the first letters of the first three words of its corporate name and of the first two letters of the last word. Petitioner has spent a considerable sum of money for advertisting and has used the name *‘ ‘*Lilco ’ ’ in connection therewith. In addition, petitioner conducts an extensive educational program in promoting the sale of its products and plumbers and dealers who successfully complete the program are authorized to use the designation *“*Lilco certified Plumber-Dealer ”. The respondent was incorporated in October, 1955, and conducts its business at Westbury, Nassau County, New York. It is presently offering for sale to the public 100,000 shares of stock and is distributing an offering circular in connection therewith. It is also distributing a circular which describes the products sold by the respondent. Both circulars contain the word “ Lilco ” in large letters, and “ Mfg. Corp.” in much smaller letters contained within the block of the first L in “ Lilco ’ ’.

Because of its use over a period of time, the large amount of money expended in advertising, and its use by newspapers in referring to the petitioner, ‘1 Lilco ’ ’ has become practically synonymous with Long Island Lighting Company. The respondent denies that its purpose in using the name was to confuse the public or to appropriate the good will and prestige of the petitioner. Respondent states that it chose the name by combining an abbreviation of Lillian, the name of the wife of respondent’s president and principal stockholder, with an abbreviation of the word company.

*780The clearest cases warranting the issuance of a summary judgment, and by no means the only ones, arise when the name assumed by a second user is not a word in the English language but a contrived or coined word or, if a word in the common vocabulary, one not merely descriptive of the business but patently a trade name *(Matter of Industrial Plants Corp.*v. *Industrial Liquidating Co.,*286 App. Div. 568).

The motives which induced the naming of the respondent were and are intended to cause confusion and to deceive and mislead the public. The petition is sustained and the application for an injunction is granted.

Submit order.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-35538) of PEC Solutions, Inc. of our
report dated February 11, 2003, except for the last paragraphs of Notes 5 and 16 as to which the date is March 19, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of PEC
Solutions, Inc. which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 11, 2003 relating to the financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

McLean,
Virginia
March 28, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 2.5



ICICI
Bank



ICICI
Bank Limited



(Incorporated
under the Companies Act, 1956)



CIN:
L65190GJ1994PLC021012



Registered Office: ICICI
Bank Tower, Near Chakli Circle, Old Padra Road, Vadodara - 390007



Corporate Office: ICICI
Bank Towers, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai - 400 051



SHARE
CERTIFICATE



[Pursuant
to sub-section (3) of section 46 of the Companies Act, 2013 and rule 5(2) of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014]



THIS
IS TO CERTIFY that the person(s) named in this Certificate is/are the Registered Holder(s) of the within-mentioned shares of Rupees Two
each bearing the distinctive numbers herein specified in the above named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association
of the Company and the amount endorsed herein has been paid up on each such share.



Equity
Shares each of ₹2



Amount
Paid up per share ₹2



Regd. Folio No:	Certificate
No:



Name(s) of the Holder(s):



No. of Shares held:



Distinctive No.(s):



GIVEN under the Common Seal
of the Company this



Executive Director	Company
Secretary



Authorised Signatory



Note: No transfer of the
Share(s) comprised in the Certificate can be registered unless accompanied by this Certificate.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted)
  1.
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 In Witness Whereof st
 /s/ BARRY D. QUART, PHARM.D.
    
    /s/ DENIS HICKEYBarry D. Quart, Pharm.D.
    
    Denis HickeyChief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12067]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket No. TB-96-21]

Burley Tobacco Advisory Committee; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 
App.) announcement is made of the following committee meeting:

    Name: Burley Tobacco Advisory Committee.
    Dates: June 12, 1996.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Place: Campbell House Inn, South Colonial Hall, 1375 Harrodsburg 
Road, Lexington, Kentucky 40504.
    Purpose: To elect officers, recommend opening dates, review the 
1996 policies and procedures and other related matters for the 1996 
burley tobacco marketing season.
    The meeting is open to the public. Persons, other than members, 
who wish to address the Committee at the meeting should contact John 
P. Duncan III, Director, Tobacco Division, AMS, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Room 502 Annex Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, 
D.C. 20090-6456, (202) 205-0567, prior to the meeting. Written 
statements may be submitted to the Committee before, at, or after 
the meeting.

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
John P. Duncan III,
Director, Tobacco Division.
[FR Doc. 96-12067 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
```
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") of Parke Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Vito S. Pantilione, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John F. Hawkins, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Vito S. Pantilione


/s/ John F. HawkinsVito S. Pantilione


John F. HawkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


(Principal Accounting Officer)


November 15, 2010
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM MAYE-PALOMA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-1423

May 10, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Robert Dittmer, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and Clark E. Green, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee and James A. Hellickson, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Percy Vernon Rancifer V. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00497

- CR

Date motion filed: May 28, 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justice K e yes, M a ssengale and Brown

Date: June 7, 2013
Exhibit 32. 1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

The following
certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

(1) the accompanying report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated for the periods presented therein.

Date: February 26, 2009



/s/ Richard K. WilliamsRichard K. WilliamsChief Executive Officer


Date: February 26, 2009



/s/ Brian R. McDonaldBrian R. McDonaldChief Financial Officer


A signed original of the above certification has been provided to Advanced Analogic
Technologies Incorporated and will be retained by Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000812

26-FEB-2015

08:50 AM
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Asia Cork Inc. on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





February
11, 2010





By:  /s/ Yi
Tong


Yi
Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer