alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12672]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP96-173-002 and RP89-183-062]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 15, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 9, 1996, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised Sheet Nos. 8A and 8B and 
Original Sheet Nos. 8C and 8D, with the proposed effective date of 
April 13, 1996, and Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 6A, with the proposed 
effective date of June 1, 1996.
    WNG states that on March 13, 1996, it filed in Docket Nos. RP96-
173-000 and RP89-183-000 to recover approximately $6.0 million of 
additional contract reformation and gas supply realignment costs 
pursuant to the November 24, 1992 Stipulation and Agreement (November 
24 S & A) in Docket No. RP89-183, et al. and Article 14 of its FERC Gas 
Tariff. On April 9, 1996, the Commission issued an Order Accepting and 
Suspending Tariff Sheets Subject to Refund and Conditions (April 9 
order). WNG was directed to file ``revised tariff sheets reflecting the 
allocation of 10 percent of the GSR costs above $50 million to IT 
customers, to be recovered through a volumetric surcharge and 
reflecting a 90 percent allocation of the remaining GSR costs to the 
firm transportation customers, to be recovered through a reservation 
surcharge.'' WNG states that the instant filing is made in compliance 
with the April 9 order.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing were served on all 
participants listed on the service lists maintained by the Commission 
in the dockets referenced above and on all of WNG's jurisdictional 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this fiing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12672 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
|   | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Ronny Yakov                               |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|          | Name:  | Ronny Yakov                                   |
|               | Title: | President and Interim Chief Financial Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1201]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Fossil Energy
[FE Docket No. 95-112-NG]


Indeck-Yerkes Limited Partnership; Order Granting Long-Term 
Authorization to Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Indeck-Yerkes Limited 
Partnership authorization to import up to 7 Bcf of natural gas per day 
from Canada over a period of eight years, under the terms and 
conditions of letter agreements with Talisman Energy Inc.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., December 21, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 96-1201 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Salindra EVANS, Appellant.

No. 62887.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 25, 1994.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, F. Martin Dajani, Asst. At-tys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and interfering with an arrest. On appeal, Defendant alleges there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction for interfering with an arrest. We affirm.

Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.-25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERREQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| I, Dean E. Sukowatey, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of ICrystal,                Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as                adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,                that                the accompanying report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended                December                31, 2006, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on                the                date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.                I                further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of the Company. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: March 28, 2007. | /s/ DEAN E. SUKOWATEY |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------|--------|

|   | Dean E. SukowateyActing Chief Accounting Officer |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
Order entered September 18, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 00560 - CR No. 05 - 16 - 00561 - CR No. 05 - 16 - 00562 - CR No. 05 - 16 - 00563 - CR MERCEDES M. BIGGURS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F08 - 57650 - U , F14 - 70586 - U, F14 - 70971 - U, F14 - 75674 - U 

### O RDER The clerk’s records filed in these appeals contain only certificatio ns of the right to appeal arising from appellant’s placement on deferred adjudication in 2009 and 2014. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, supplemental clerk’s records containing certificatio ns of appellant’s right to appeal from the judgments adjudicating guilt in these proceedings. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
CLERK OF TH E SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRowN BY: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 83340 

# F JUN 2otz

EN( NEXNOVO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., F/K/A DWS TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., Appellant,

vs. MURPHY & CO., LLP, Res e ondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Paul M. Haire, Settlement Judge Dziminski Law Group Hone Law Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER
tor 19-17 

### 2-2- 

## 07260
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-11137

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Osvaldo Ayala-Galicia, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:21-CR-378-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Osvaldo AyalaGarcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ayala-Garcia has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 31, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-11137 Document: 00516839874 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2023
No. 22-11137

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 22-11137 Document: 00516839874 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/31/2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 72 DB 2022 (No. 36 RST 2022)

:

RYAN MICHAEL JONES : Attorney Registration No. 308235

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : (Philadelphia)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2022, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 8, 2022, is approved and it is ORDERED that

RYAN MICHAEL JONES, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that they have the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

SERGIO LUA-BERMEJO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-50435

D.C. No. CR-06-02515-TJW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Lua-Bermejo appeals from his conviction for attempted entry after

deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

MAR 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-50435

Lua-Bermejo contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion

to dismiss the indictment because the prior removal alleged in the indictment was

the product of a fundamentally unfair deportation proceeding. First, Lua-Bermejo

contends that his appeal waiver was invalid. The record reflects that his waiver

was “considered and intelligent.” United States v. Estrada-Torres, 179 F.3d 776,

781 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), overruled on other grounds by United States v.

Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc). 

Second, Lua-Bermejo contends that he was not adequately advised of

possible eligibility for discretionary relief under former section 212(c) of the

Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (1994). There was no

possibility that Lua-Bermejo was eligible for relief because he did not have the

requisite seven years of unrelinquished domicile. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (1994);

United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 629 F.3d 894, 896-901 (9th Cir. 2010) (en

banc). Accordingly, the immigration judge did not have a duty to inform him of

such relief. See Lopez-Velasquez, 629 F.3d at 901.

Finally, Lua-Bermejo contends that his waiver of the right to counsel was

not knowing and voluntary. This contention was not raised in the district court and
3 07-50435

we decline to consider it for the first time on appeal. See Rhoades v. Henry, 598

F.3d 495, 501 & n.7 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.
PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby promises to pay to
or to the order of EYI Industries, Inc. (the "Lender") at 3960 Howard
Hughes Parkway, Suite 500, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109 on demand,
the principal sum of $180,000 US together with interest thereon at the
rate of 4% per annum both before and after maturity from the date
hereof.

Should the undersigned commit an event of default under the terms
and conditions of the loan agreement between the undersigned and
the Lender dated the 10th day of February, 2005, the principal sum
remaining unpaid together with interest thereon as aforesaid shall be
due and payable forthwith without demand.

The undersigned waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and
notice of dishonour and all other demands and notices in connection
with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of
this Promissory Note.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 10th day of February,
2005.

/s/ Janet Carpenter
JANET CARPENTER
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION


OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Regis
Kwong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




I, Robert
Feng, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Jingwei International Limited for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Jingwei International Limited.




By:
                    /s/
      Regis KwongRegis
      KwongChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)By:
                    /s/
      Robert FengRobert
      FengChief
      Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer)




August
13, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smartpay Express, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Smartpay Express Inc.





Date: May 16, 2011
By
/s/ Xianxia WangXianxia WangChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended  September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 7,  2008                       |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA                          |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                    |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp.
II (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Michael Kaswan, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Michael Kaswan                                       Dated: June 6, 2005
    -----------------------------
    Michael Kaswan
    Chief Operating Officer
    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
```