[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 22, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25730-25731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12805]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Summary Notice No. PE-96-25]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received; 
Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions 
of prior petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption (14 
CFR Part 11), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions 
seeking relief from specified requirements of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), dispositions of certain petitions 
previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to 
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of 
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before June 10, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal 
Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket 
(AGC-200), Petition Docket No. ________, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, D.C. 20591.
    Comments may also be sent electronically to the following internet 
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5937292b343a342d2a1934383035773128773f3838773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e48a94968987899097a489858d88ca8c95ca828585ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final 
disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are 
available for examination in the Rules Docket (AGC-200), Room 915G, FAA 
Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone (202) 267-7470.
    This notice is published pursuant to paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) 
of Sec. 11.27 of Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
Part 11).

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 16, 1996.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No: 28469.
    Petitioner: Neptune, Inc.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 137.53(b)(2).
    Description of Relief Sought: To permit appropriately trained 
pilots employed by Neptune, who have less than 100 hours of flight 
experience as pilot in command in dispensing agriculture materials or 
chemicals, to conduct aerial firefighting operations over congested 
areas.

    Docket No.: 28503.
    Petitioner: Mr. Kenneth R. Pearce.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3).
    Description of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Pearce to provide 
recurrent flight training and simulated instrument flight training in 
Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air aircraft equipped with a 
functioning throwover control wheel for the purpose of meeting recency 
of experience requirements contained in Secs. 61.56 (a), (c), (e), (g), 
and 61.57(e)(2).

    Docket No.: 28512.
    Petitioner: Mr. Robert P. Lavery.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3).
    Description of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Lavery to conduct 
recurrent flight training in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air 
aircraft; and recurrent flight training in simulated instrument flight 
in Beechcraft Baron and Travel Air aircraft, when those aircraft are 
equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of 
functioning dual controls.

    Docket No.: 28514.
    Petitioner: Mr. Henry D. Canterbury.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3).
    Decription of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Canterbury to conduct 
recurrent flight training in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air 
aircraft; and recurrent flight training in simulated instrument flight 
in Beechcraft Baron and Travel Air aircraft, when those aircraft are 
equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of 
functioning dual controls.

    Docket No.: 28515.
    Petitioner: Mr. Kenneth L. Fossler.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3).
    Decription of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Fossler to conduct 
recurrent flight training in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air 
aircraft; and recurrent flight training in simulated instrument

[[Page 25731]]

flight in Beechcraft Baron and Travel Air aircraft, when those aircraft 
are equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of 
functioning dual controls.

    Docket No.: 28517.
    Petitioner: Mr. Samuel D. James.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3).
    Decription of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. James to conduct 
recurrent flight training in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air 
aircraft; and recurrent flight training in simulated instrument flight 
in Beechcraft Baron and Travel Air aircraft, when those aircraft are 
equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of 
functioning dual controls.

    Docket No.: 28530.
    Petitioner: Mr. John A. Porter.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3).
    Decription of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Porter to conduct 
recurrent flight training in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air 
aircraft; and recurrent flight training in simulated instrument flight 
in Beechcraft Baron and Travel Air aircraft, when those aircraft are 
equipped with a functioning throwover control when in place of 
functioning dual controls.

    Docket No.: 28533.
    Petitioner: Tradewind Turbines Corp.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 21.19.
    Decription of Relief Sought: To permit Tradewind Turbines Corp., to 
apply for a supplemental type certificate rather than a new type 
certificate for a design change that would replace two piston engines 
with one turbine engine on the Beechcraft 58P Baron.

    Docket No.: 28536.
    Petitioner: Mr. Kenneth W. Brown.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3).
    Decription of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Brown to conduct 
recurrent flight training in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air 
aircraft; and recurrent flight training in simulated instrument flight 
in Beechcraft Baron and Travel Air aircraft, when those aircraft are 
equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of 
functioning dual controls.

    Docket No.: 28538.
    Petitioner: Mr. John M. Hirsch.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109 (a) and (b)(3)
    Decription of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Hirsch to conduct 
recurrent flight training in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air 
aircraft; and recurrent flight training in simulated instrument flight 
in Beechcraft Baron and Travel Air aircraft, when those aircraft are 
equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of 
functioning dual controls.

Disposition of Petitions

    Docket No.: 133CE.
    Petitioner: Pilatus Aircraft LTD.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 23.562(c)(5).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Pilatus Aircraft 
LTD to continue delivering aircraft while they solve the problem of 
meeting the requirements of Sec. 25.562(c)(5) with a customer 
acceptable solution.
    Partial Grant, April 23, 1996, Exemption No. 6429.

    Docket No.: 28370.
    Petitioner: Cessna Aircraft Company.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 25.562.
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit the Cessna 
Aircraft Company exemption from the emergency landing dynamic 
conditions of Sec. 25.562 for multiple-occupancy, side-facing divans in 
the Cessna Model 750 airplane.
    Partial Grant, April 25, 1996, Exemption No. 6432.

    Docket No.: 28463.
    Petitioner: Cessna Aircraft Company.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 25.161(d).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit the Cessna 
Aircraft Company exemption from the engine-out lateral/directional trim 
requirements of Sec. 25.161(d) of the FAR.
    Grant, April 26, 1996, Exemption No. 6431.

[FR Doc. 96-12805 Filed 5-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>