alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


                               Amendment Number 1
                                       to
                          Shareholder Rights Agreement
                                 by and between
                            Ericsson Inc. and OZ.COM



         This Amendment Number 1 to Shareholder Rights Agreement (this
         "Amendment") is made by and between Ericsson Inc. ("Ericsson") and
         OZ.COM ("OZ") as of October __, 2000, in reference to that certain
         Sharheolder Rights Agreement (the "Agreement") made and entered to by
         Ericsson and OZ.COM as of February 4, 1999. Unless the context
         otherwise requires, capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed
         to them in the Agreement.

1        AMENDMENT

         Section 3 is hereby deleted in its entirety.

2        NO FURTHER AMENDMENTS

         All other terms of the Agreement remain unchanged.

         The Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed in two (2)
         original counterparts as of the date first written above.

         ERICSSON INC.                          OZ.COM


         /s/ LARY LYLE                          /s/ SKULI MOGENSEN
         -------------------------------        --------------------------------
                                                Skuli Mogensen
                                                Chief Executive Officer

         November 3, 2000
         Richardson, Texas
         -------------------------------        --------------------------------
         Date and place                         Date and place
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12445]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 960129019-6019-01; I.D. 051396D]

Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Pacific 
Cod by Vessels Using Hook-and-Line Gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian 
Islands

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for Pacific cod by 
vessels using hook-and-line gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
management area (BSAI). This action is necessary because the second 
seasonal Pacific halibut bycatch mortality allowance apportioned to the 
Pacific cod hook-and-line fishery in the BSAI has been reached.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), May 15, 1996, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Furuness, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    The second seasonal Pacific halibut bycatch mortality allowance for 
the hook-and-line Pacific cod fishery, which is defined at 
Sec. 675.21(b)(2)(ii)(A), is 40 metric tons (61 FR 4311, February 5, 
1996).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 675.21(d), that the second seasonal Pacific halibut bycatch 
mortality allowance for the Pacific cod hook-and-line fishery in the 
BSAI has been reached. Therefore, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing 
for Pacific cod by vessels using hook-and-line gear in the BSAI.
    Maximum retainable bycatch amounts for applicable gear types may be 
found in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under Sec. 675.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 13, 1996.
Donald J. Leedy,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-12445 Filed 5-14-96; 3:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11304]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Subsistence Resource Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Superintendent of Gates of the Arctic National Park and 
the Chairperson of the Subsistence Resource Commission for Gates of the 
Arctic National Park announce a forthcoming meeting of the Gates of the 
Arctic National Park Subsistence Resource Commission.
    The following agenda items will be discussed:

(1) Call to order.
(2) Roll call.
(3) Approval of summary of meeting minutes for November 7-9, 1995.
(4) Review agenda.
(5) Superintendent's introduction of guests and staff and review of 
SRC function and purpose.
(6) Superintendent's Management/Research Reports:
    a. Administration and Management.
    b. Park Operations.
    c. Resource Management.
    d. Subsistence Program.
(7) Public and agency comments.
(8) Old business:
    a. Incoming correspondence.
    b. Federal Subsistence Program Update.
    c. Discuss draft Review of Subsistence Law and NPS Regulations 
Paper.
    d. Update on NPS Firearms/Trapping Regulation clarification.
    e. Review of public and agency comments on Hunting Plan 
Recommendation #11: Customary and Traditional use Determinations.
    f. Status of previously submitted Hunting Plan Recommendations 
#9 and #10.
    g. Status of Anaktuvuk Pass Land Exchange Legislation.
(9) New business:
    a. Federal Regional Council actions that may affect subsistence 
regulations for the park or preserve.
    b. Incidental Business Permits and Park Concessions.
(10) Set time and place of next meeting.
(11) Adjournment.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday-Thursday, May 14-16, 1996. The 
meeting will be from 7 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Tuesday, from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m. and 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. on Wednesday and from 8:30 a.m. to 11 
a.m. on Thursday.

LOCATION: The meeting will be held at Commack's Lodge in Shungnak, 
Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dave Mills, Superintendent, Gates of the Arctic National Park and 
Preserve, P.O. Box 74680, Fairbanks, Alaska 99707. Phone (907) 456-
0281.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subsistence Resource Commissions are 
authorized under Title VIII, Section 808, of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act, Pub. L. 96-487, and operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committees Act.
Marcia Blaszak,
Acting Field Director.
[FR Doc. 96-11304 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3(a) 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006, as previously
amended (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into on October 17, 2006, effective as of January 1, 2006 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Placer Sierra Bancshares, a California corporation (the “Company”)
and Ronald W. Bachli (the “Executive”) (collectively sometimes referred to as the “Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and
the Executive have determined that certain provisions of the Agreement contain transcription errors, and the Company and the Executive desire to correct such errors in order to conform the Agreement to the intent of the Parties; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have determined that additional corrections should be made to the Agreement during the corrective amendment period
prescribed by Internal Revenue Service guidance and proposed regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, in order to conform the Agreement to the intent of the Parties and the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
 1. Each occurrence of the reference to “Section 2(b)(vi)” in Sections 2(b)(vii) and 4 of the Agreement is hereby replaced with “Section
2(b)(vii)”. 
 2. Each occurrence of the clause “(unless an election to receive the retirement benefit in some other manner is
timely made in accordance with Section 2(b)(vi))” in Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby deleted. 
 3. The last sentence in
each of Section 4(a)(i) and Section 4(b)(i) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 
 “The Company shall pay such
amount on or before the 15th day following the Company’s receipt of Executive’s duly executed and unrevoked Release; provided, however, that if such payment otherwise would be made within the first six (6) months following termination
of Executive’s employment with the Company, such payment shall instead be made on the first day of the seventh month following such termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such lump sum payment shall be made unless the duly executed and
unrevoked Release is delivered to the Company no later than two (2) months following the end of the calendar year in which Executive’s employment termination occurs. 







 4. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 In witness whereof, the Executive has hereunto set his hand and, pursuant to the authorization from the Board of Directors of the Company, the Company
has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	PLACER SIERRA BANCSHARES
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert J. Kushner

	Name:	 	Robert J. Kushner
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
	Date:	 	October 17, 2006

  

	
	 /s/ Ronald W. Bachli

	RONALD W. BACHLI
	Date: October 17, 2006
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. BROWN, Appellant.

No. WD 47084.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 24, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court DeMed June 28, 1994.

Application to Transfer DeMed Aug. 15, 1994.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from jury conviction of one count of murder in the second degree and sentence of ten years imprisonment.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 10638 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Rene Rodriguez,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22
- CR
- 33 - 1

**_______________________ _______**  Before **Stewart, Dennis,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Rene Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 27, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10638 Document: 00516689726 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2023No. 22
- 10638

2 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further r esponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-10638 Document: 00516689726 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2023
* The Honorable R. Leon Jordan, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation. RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0309p.06 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

_________________
D AVID M C FARLAND , Parent and Next Friend of Stephen and Daniel McFarland; R ONALD J EFFREY P ITTENGER , Parent and Next Friend of Brandon Pittenger; ANTHONY UNDERWOOD , Custodial Parent and Next Friend of Max Aubrey, Plaintiffs, C RYSTAL D. M EREDITH , Custodial Parent and Next Friend of Joshua Ryan McDonald, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v . J EFFERSON C OUNTY PUBLIC S CHOOLS , Defendant,
J EFFERSON C OUNTY B OARD OF E DUCATION ; S TEPHEN W. D AESCHNER , Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees. 

### X - - - -> 

### , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N No. 04-5897

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville. No. 02-00620—John G. Heyburn II, Chief District Judge. Argued: June 9, 2005 Decided and Filed: July 21, 2005 Before: NORRIS and DAUGHTREY, Circu it Judges; JORDAN, District Judge. *

_________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Teddy B. Gordon, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Francis J. Mellen, Jr., WYATT, TARRANT & COMBS, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Teddy B. Gordon, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Francis J. Mellen, Jr., Byron E. Leet, WYATT, TARRANT & COMBS, Louisville, Kentucky, fo r Appellees. Amy D. Cubbage, Sheryl G.

1No. 04-5897 McFarland, et al. v. Jefferson County Public Schools, et al. Page 2
Snyder, Bridget H. Papalia, FROST, BROWN & TODD, Louisville, Kentucky, Morgan G. Ransdell, KENTUCKY COMMISSION ON HUMAN RI GHTS, Louisville, Kentucky, Chester Darling, CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATI ON OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, Andover, Massachusetts, Michael Williams, Robert J. Roughsedge, CITIZENS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, Boston, Massachusetts, Maya R. Kobersy, John W. Borkowski, Maree Sneed, HOGAN & HARTSON, Washington, D.C., Albert H. Kauffman, THE CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Chinh Quang Le, NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, New York, New York, for Amici Curiae.

_________________ OPINION

_________________ PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Crystal Meredith, on behalf of her son Joshua Ryan McDonald, appeals the decision of the district court to uphold the student assignment plan of the Jefferson County Public Schools, which includes racial guide lines. The district court concluded that the assignment plan met the constraints of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because the school board had a compelling interest to use the racial guidelines and applied them in a manner that was narrowly tailored to realize its goals. McFarland v. Jefferson County Public Schools , 330 F. Supp. 2d 834 (W.D. Ky. 2004). Because the reasoning which supports judgment fo r defendants has been articulated in the well-reasoned opinion of the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose. The judgment of the district court is affirmed

.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 4, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-44

Lower Tribunal No. 19-14656

________________

Servis One, Inc., etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

JL International Investments, LLC,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gina 

Beovides, Judge.

Ghidotti | Berger LLP, and Chase A. Berger, Tara Rosenfeld, and 

Jason L. Duggar, for appellant.

Neil Rose (Hollywood); Howard S. Weinstein P.A., and Howard S. 

Weinstein (Hollywood), for appellee.

Before EMAS, HENDON and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM. 
2

Affirmed. See Jersey Palm-Gross, Inc. v. Paper, 658 So. 2d 531, 535 

(Fla. 1995) (holding that “a usury savings clause cannot, by itself, absolutely 

insulate a lender from a finding of usury . . . . Rather, [it is] one factor to be 

considered in the overall determination of whether the lender intended to 

exact a usurious interest rate;” further observing “that a contrary holding 

would permit a lender to ‘relieve himself of the pains and penalties visited by 

law upon such an act by merely writing into the contract a disclaimer of any 

intention to do that which under his contract he has plainly done.’”) 

(Additional citations omitted.)
EXHIBIT
32.1




MMC
ENERGY, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MMC Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Hamilton,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MMC Energy, Inc. and will be retained by MMC Energy, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


August
      19, 2009/s/
      Michael J. HamiltonMichael
      J. HamiltonChief
      Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
H. Res. 298 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 1, 2009. 

Whereas safe, creative, and effective on-premise signage has 

served as a primary catalyst to successful small businesses in America since the establishment of the Nation; 

Whereas most of the companies that manufacture on-premise 

signs in the United States are in and of themselves small 

businesses as described by the Small Business Act and 

generate thousands of manufacturing jobs that stimulate 

the economy and support the local, State, and Federal 

tax bases; 

Whereas the on-premise sign industry in turn sustains millions of additional entities covered under the Small Business Act by providing to retail businesses across the 

country an affordable and effective advertising medium 

through which they can communicate to potential customers about goods and services they offer, direct those 

customers to their small business sites, and reinforce the 

memory of existing customers about the locations and the 

nature of these small businesses; 

Whereas the Small Business Act empowers the Small Business Administration to take actions to relieve the competitive disadvantages that small businesses face; 
2 

•HRES 298 EH 

Whereas one such competitive disadvantage for small businesses is a lack of marketing research and advertising 

budgets to attract and retain customers; 

Whereas the Small Business Administration has recognized 

the value of on-premise signage as a remedy to these 

competitive disadvantages and has taken action to remediate this disadvantage by collaborating with the sign industry to collect educational information about signs and 

to publish that information on its website that is free of 

charge and easily accessible to all small businesses; and 

Whereas the on-premise sign industry will play a critical role 

in supporting the Nation’s small businesses during the 

current economic downturn: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives (1) applauds the United States Small Business Administration for 

educating small business owners on the benefits of using wellplaced, well-designed on-premise signs to overcome competitive disadvantages in the areas of marketing and advertising, 

and (2) encourages the on-premise sign industry to continue 

its efforts to produce a new and greater understanding of 

how to develop safer, more effective, and more affordable 

signage products so as to alleviate small businesses’ competitive disadvantages in marketing and advertising. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Form of Voting Agreement


    EXHIBIT
      10.20

     

    FORM
      OF VOTING AGREEMENT

     

    TO:
      The
      Purchasers of Pacificnet, Inc. Debentures and Warrants

     

    To
      Whom
      It May Concern:

     

    This
      letter will confirm my agreement to vote all shares of Pacificnet, Inc. (“PACT”)
      voting stock over which I have voting control in favor of any resolution
      presented to the shareholders of PACT to approve the issuance, in the aggregate,
      of more than 19.999% of the number of shares of common stock of PACT outstanding
      on date of closing pursuant to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement,
      dated
      February __ 2006, among PACT and the purchasers signatory thereto (the
“Purchase
      Agreement”)
      and
      the other agreements entered into in connection therewith or as otherwise may
      be
      required by the applicable rules and regulations of the Nasdaq National Market
      (or any successor entity). This agreement is given in consideration of and
      as a
      condition to enter into such Securities Purchase Agreement and is not revocable
      by me.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ 
	 	
              
Name
              of Shareholder:
	 	Percentage
              Beneficial Ownership: