25854 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 101 / Thursday, May 23, 1996 / Notices

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 and 18

CFR 385.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before

May 23, 1996. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12921 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. CP96–289–000, CP96–335–

000, CP96–506–000, CP96–288–000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company,

Trailblazer Pipeline Company

Wyoming Interstate Gas Company,

Ltd.; Notice of Technical Conference

May 17, 1996.

Take notice that a technical

conference has been scheduled in the

above-captioned proceeding for 10:00

a.m. on June 13, 1996, at the offices of

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, N.E.,

Washington, DC 20426. The purpose of

the conference is to discuss matters of

interest and concern relating to the

parties’ proposals to construct and

operate new and/or additional

compression facilities, as well as

Colorado Interstate Gas Company’s

proposal to acquire and hold capacity

on Trailblazer Pipeline Company and

Wyoming Interstate Gas Company, Ltd.

All interested parties are invited to

attend. For additional information,

interested parties may call Michael J.

McGehee at (202) 208–2257.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12914 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP96–190–002]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company;

Notice of Tariff Compliance Filing

May 17, 1996.

Take notice that on May 15, 1996,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG),

tendered for filing revised tariff sheets

and to withdraw tariff sheets filed May

10, 1996, to its FERC Gas Tariff, First

Revised Volume No. 1.

CIG states that the new tariff sheets

are filed to correct errors in the sheets

filed May 10, 1996 and to comply with

Ordering Paragraph (C) of the Order

issued April 15, 1996 in Docket No.

RP96–190–000. CIG discovered that the

May 10, 1996 filed tariff sheets

erroneously included two paragraphs at

the end of Substitute Original Sheet No.

380 and some other minor wording

errors and is filing herein to withdraw

those tariff sheets (Substitute First

Revised Sheet No. 379 and Substitute

Original Sheet No. 380. CIG is filing

herein corrected tariff sheets.

CIG states that the tariff sheets filed

May 10, 1996 were filed in accordance

with the April 25, 1996 Order. Article

38 of the General Terms and Conditions

of the Tariff was revised to state that

new and existing Shippers that pay the

maximum recourse rates have the same

right to capacity as a Shipper willing to

pay the higher negotiated rate. In

addition, the revised tariff sheets state

that negotiated rates do not apply as the

price cap for capacity release

transactions.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with 385.211 of

the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed in accordance with Section

154.209 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12916 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–363–006]

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Filing

May 17, 1996.

Take notice that on May 14, 1996, El

Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso)

submitted schedules in support of the

proposed fuel charge percentages to be

assessed for transportation services on

its mainline system. El Paso requested

that upon approval and implementation

of its proposed Settlement, the

Commission promptly issue an order

accepting the fuel charges proposed

therein so that El Paso may implement

such charges not later than January 1,

1997.

El Paso states that Article VIII, Fuel,

of its Stipulation and Agreement in

Settlement of Rate and Related

Proceedings (Settlement) provides for

the periodic adjustment of El Paso’s

system-wide fuel charge during the term

of the Settlement. Specifically,

paragraph 8.2 provides that not later

than 60 days after filing the Settlement,

El Paso will file to adjust its fuel charges

based on actual fuel usage experienced

on its system during the calendar years

1994 and 1995, to be effective not later

than January 1, 1997.

El Paso states that copies of the filing

were served upon all interstate pipeline

system transportation customers of El

Paso and interested state regulatory

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12906 Filed 5–22–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP96–270–001]

Mid Continent Market Center, Inc.,

Complainant v. Panhandle Eastern

Pipe Line Company, Respondent;

Notice of Amended Complaint

May 17, 1996.

Take notice that on May 13, 1996,

Mid Continent Market Center, Inc. (Mid

Continent), P.O. Box 889, 818 Kansas

Avenue, Topeka, Kansas, 66601, filed an

amended complaint in Docket No. Rules

of Practice and Procedure. Mid

Continent charges Panhandle Eastern

Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) with

undue discrimination and

anticompetitive behavior for its failure

to timely agree to interconnect facilities

and its apparent improper classification

of the proposed receipt point in

Panhandle’s Field Zone rather than in

Panhandle’s Market Zone. The details of

Mid Continent’s allegations are more

fully set forth in the amended complaint

which is on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

The Commission previously issued a

Notice of Complaint in Docket No.