alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark Thompson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Spark Networks plc;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Mark Thompson      
|Mark Thompson          
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2006
Exhibit
      32.2






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
          connection with the Annual Report of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc. (the
          “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
          I, James E. Hines, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer
          of the
          Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
          1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that:


(1)       
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






**EarthBlock
                Technologies, Inc**Date: May
                9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ James
                E. HinesChief
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Noah A. Samara, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of WorldSpace, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2007



/s/    NOAH A.
SAMARANoah A. SamaraChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 21



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                    |  |                      
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Name                                |  | State of Organization
|Education Lending Services, Inc.    |  | Delaware             
|Student Loan Xpress, Inc.           |  | Delaware             
|Education Loan Servicing Corp.      |  | Delaware             
|Education Funding Resources, LLC    |  | Delaware             
|Education Funding Capital I, LLC    |  | Delaware             
|Education Funding Capital TrustI   |  | Delaware             
|Education Funding Capital TrustII  |  | Delaware             
|Education Funding Capital TrustIII |  | Delaware
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  C LARA C RAWFORD , Plaintiff,

v. No. 06-55822 M ICHAEL J. A STRUE , Commissioner 

#  of Social Security Administration, D.C. No.

Defendant-Appellee, CV-00-11884 (AN)
B RIAN C. S HAPIRO , Real-party-ininterest-Appellant. 

# 

 R UBY W ASHINGTON , Plaintiff,

v. No. 06-55954 M ICHAEL J. A STRUE , Commissioner 

#  of Social Security Administration, D.C. No.

Defendant-Appellee, CV-03-06884 (AN)
Y OUNG C HO , Real-party-ininterest-Appellant. 

# 

6565

#  D APHNE M. T REJO ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 06-56284 M ICHAEL J. A STRUE , Commissioner D.C. No. of Social Security Administration, CV-98-



#  Respondent-Appellee, 05662 (RNB) D ENISE B OURGEOIS H ALEY , ORDER Attorney, Real-party-ininterest-Appellant. 

# 

Filed May 27, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI , Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 6566 C RAWFORD v. A STRUEPRINTED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009
#### Othel Marie HICKMAN, Appellant, v. Curtis Edward HICKMAN, Respondent.

No. WD 50590.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 30, 1996.

R. Cristine Stallings, Bethany, for appellant.

Deborah Havens, Trenton, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her motion to modify for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, § 452.450, RSMo 1994. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Financial Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
Jerald L. Fenstermaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and J. Kevin Maxwell, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jerald L.
      FenstermakerJerald
      L. FenstermakerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)August
      7, 2009/s/ J. Kevin MaxwellJ.
      Kevin MaxwellTreasurer
      and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)August
      7,
2009
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoine L. BRACKEN, Appellant. Antoine L. BRACKEN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 65441, 67772.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 20, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*420ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Antoine Bracken, appeals from Ms judgments of conviction, following a jury trial, for second degree murder and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to two concurrent terms of life imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from the denial of Ms Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

As to defendant’s direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opirnon would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Defendant’s convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action and the denial of defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed.
ACCEPTED12-15-00140-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS

6/10/2015 4:39:27 PMCATHY LUSK

CLERK

            FILED IN12th COURT OF APPEALS        TYLER, TEXAS6/10/2015 4:39:27 PM        CATHY S. LUSK                Clerk
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-11097

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PACOMIO BLANCO-RUIZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00454-WMR-CCB-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-11097

Before WILSON, LUCK, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pacomio Blanco‐Ruiz appeals from the district court’s written judgment ordering an eight‐month term of imprisonment following the revocation of his supervised release. He asserts his sentence should be vacated and remanded for imposition of a corrected judgment because the written judgment conflicts with the 

oral pronouncement at sentencing. The Government agrees that 

we should remand to allow the district court to correct the judgment to conform with the six-month term. 

“When a sentence pronounced orally and unambiguously 

conflicts with the written order of judgment, the oral pronouncement governs.” United States v. Bates, 213 F.3d 1336, 1340 (11th Cir. 

2000). The remedy for a conflict between an orally pronounced 

sentence and the written judgment is a limited remand with instructions to amend the judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. United States v. Chavez, 204 F.3d 1305, 1316 (11th Cir. 

2000).

The written judgment unambiguously contradicts the oral 

pronouncement at sentencing because it imposes an eight‐month 

sentence, but the district court said twice at sentencing that it was 

varying downward from eight months to six months. Blanco-Ruiz 

does not offer any other arguments challenging the revocation of 

his supervised release or his six-month sentence, and therefore, has 

abandoned any such challenges. See United States v. Campbell, 26 

USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 2 of 3
23-11097 Opinion of the Court 3

F.4th 860, 873 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 95 (2022) 

(stating an issue not raised on appeal will be deemed abandoned 

and will not be addressed on appeal absent extraordinary circumstances). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Blanco-Ruiz’s 

supervised release and his sentence and remand to the district court 

for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to conform with 

the oral pronouncement of a six-month term of imprisonment.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2005

of WorldSpace, Inc.



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of WorldSpace, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |  |  |                                                               
|------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |  | 
|Date:    November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    NOAH A. SAMARA                                         
|                          |  |  |  | Noah A. Samara Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President



The certification set
forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
#### Arthur George BOSTIC, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 09-88-316 CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Aug. 30, 1989.

*739Douglas M. Barlow, Daylee Wiggins, Beaumont, for appellant.

John R. DeWitt, Beaumont, for State.

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Appellant pleaded no contest to the charge of aggravated sexual assault. He signed no judicial confessions or made no judicial admission in court. The State introduced copies of the victim’s statement and police reports. The court found appellant guilty and, at a later hearing, assessed punishment at sixty years in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant urges two points of error, the evidence was insufficient to prove jurisdiction in this state and venue in the county. He argues no evidence was presented to show the offense occurred in Jefferson County, Texas. We affirm.

*TEX.R.APP.P. 80(d)*provides that a court of appeals shall presume that venue was proved in the court below “unless such matters were made an issue in the court below....” This presumption applies to venue both within the State of Texas, *Whalon v. State,*725 S.W.2d 181 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), and within a particular county, *Holdridge v. State,*707 S.W.2d 18 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). Since appellant did not make an issue of the venue in the court below, the presumption applies. Both points are overruled, and the judgment affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
!"#$"%%&	''( !#$



)



*	*		+*	
,($

! 



(%(#-!#$.&	''( ((.



!#-

	
(/"0#! 

"1(2$01,($! 



(%(#-!#$.

0&34

 


056&2)&37&
8 

".$1"2$
091$%01	1":0#!

92.0#





;<<



	''( !#$(##($=!#"( "(-(>!##'1".0#"-(#$"%"2!$"0##9>?(15@&

7A=!.?((#/1!#$(- (!)($0'102((-"#%01>!'!9'(1"."#$=".!''(! !#-=!.

20>' ($(-!#-%" (-$=(1(B9"1(-!9$=01":!$"0#%01>-"1(2$"#/$=(!''10'1"!$(

'1".0#0%%"2"! .$0!..(..20 (2$!#-%01C!1-$0$=(-".$1"2$2091$$=(%" "#/!#-

-02D($"#/%((.%01$=".!''(! '91.9!#$$0A
E73F?GFG!#-FG=".

2091$=(1(?H!..(..(.!#"#"$"! %" "#/%((0%'(12(#$0%$=(/1(!$(10%F	G$=(

IJKLMNOPOQRSTURTVOSVNRNOUWXMONRYYZ[OUX\]^_]`aMbPNUcJdLOefT
	




		

	



		
		

	


	


	
	
 !"!	
#$	
	
	


	
%	
			
	

	



	&" 



	

%	
	
	
%

#

'()
		


*
	

	
$

	
+	
,

(	 %	





	
	


	
	 
	 	

%	
	

	
	
		 
	 

	%	
			


	









#-..!/0#,#(#123!#4
	
	






	
)
	
	


	

#

'()

	
)	
		

	




#

56789:;<;=>?@A>@B;?B:>:;ACD9;:>EEFG;ADHIJKILM9N<:AO6P8:QR@
	








	






 !

"##$ # %&'&



()*+,-./.01234135.25-1-.467,.-1889:.47;<=><?@,A/-4B)C+3DE3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Infant, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jason Macari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   Jason Macari        |                     |
|---------------------------|--------------------------|
| Jason   Macari            | Dated: May 12, 2011 |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer |                     |

 

----
H. Res. 269 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 5, 2009. 

Whereas approximately 7,000,000 motorcyclists ride on our 

Nation’s roads and highways to commute, travel, and 

recreate; 

Whereas motorcycles are a valuable component of the transportation mix; 

Whereas motorcycles are fuel-efficient and decrease congestion while having little impact on our Nation’s transportation infrastructure; 

Whereas the United States is the world leader in motorcycle 

safety, promoting education, licensing, use of protective 

gear, and motorcycle awareness; 

Whereas the motorcycling community is committed to decreasing motorcycle crashes through licensing, training, 

education, enforcement, personal responsibility, and increased public awareness; 

Whereas, according to a comprehensive study conducted on 

motorcycle crash causation in the United States the ‘‘Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of 

Countermeasures’’ (Hurt Report), in approximately twothirds of fatal car-motorcycle crashes, the driver of the 

car was at fault; 
2 

•HRES 269 EH 

Whereas motorcycle awareness is beneficial to all road users 

and will help to decrease car-motorcycle crashes; 

Whereas May is designated as ‘‘Motorcycle Safety Awareness 

Month’’; and 

Whereas the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

promotes Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month to encourage riders to always wear helmets and other protective 

gear, never drink and ride, be properly licensed, and get 

training and to remind all riders and motorists to always 

share the road: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the contribution motorcycles make to 

the transportation mix; 

(2) encourages all road users to be more aware of 

motorcycles and motorcyclists’ safety; 

(3) encourages all riders to receive appropriate 

training and practice safe riding skills; and 

(4) supports the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Adsero Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yvon Leveille,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Yvon Leveille
------------------------------------
Name:    Yvon Leveille
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    April 14, 2005