alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 15, 2006 | /s/ ROBERT J. ZATTA                               |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Robert J. Zatta                                   |
|                    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Companyfor purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1-2 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25481-25482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12654]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 25482]]

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, advisory group on electron devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group C (Electro-Optics) of the DoD Advisory Group on 
Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Tuesday, 11 June 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elise Rabin, AGED Secretariat, 1745 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, 
Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing 
an effective and economical research and development program in the 
area of electron devices.
    The Working Group C meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the Military Departments proposed to 
initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This 
opto-electronic device area includes such programs as imaging device, 
infrared detectors and lasers. The review will include details of 
classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. II Sec. 10(d) (1988)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly, this meeting will be 
closed to the public.

    Dated: May 15, 1996.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-12654 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Marcole REED, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 67203.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 30, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 14, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant pleaded guilty to illegal distribution/sale of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994. Movant was sentenced to an eight year term of imprisonment. He was delivered to the custody of the Missouri Department of Corrections on January 18,1994. He filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-convietion relief on June 16,1994, which was denied as untimely.

On appeal, movant contends the mandatory time limits of Rule 24.035 violate due process, equal protection and federal habeas corpus rights. We deny movant’s point. The time constraints of Rule 24.035 are constitutionally valid and are mandatory by their terms. *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). The constraints do not violate the rights of due process or equal protection. *Dwyer v. State,*781 S.W.2d 574 (Mo.App.1989). They do not constitute a suspension of the right to relief under habeas corpus. *White v. State,*779 S.W.2d 571, 573 (Mo. banc 1989).

Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12047]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 91-58, RM-7419, RM-7797, RM-7798]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Caldwell, College Station and Gause, 
TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed by 
Roy E. Henderson directed to the Report and Order in this proceeding. 
See 60 FR 52914, published October 11, 1995. With this action, the 
proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 14, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order in MM Docket No. 91-58, adopted April 26, 
1996, and released May 9, 1996. The full text of this decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1919 M Street, NW., Room 246, or 2100 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-12047 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Laser Operations LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W911QX-06-C-0044 et al. ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59528

Andrew Mohr, Esq. Gabriel Kennon, Esq.

Cohen Mohr LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Srikanti Schaffner, Esq.

Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 18 November 2015

# /~4:_(efd-- MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59528, Appeal ofLaser Operations LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5911 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude strike benefits 

from gross income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 6, 2023 

Mr. THANEDAR (for himself and Ms. TLAIB) introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

strike benefits from gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STRIKE BENEFITS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap5 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new section: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5911 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 139J. COMPENSATION FOR LOST WAGES RELATING 

2 TO A STRIKE. 

3 ‘‘In the case of an individual, gross income shall not 

4 include compensation provided to a member of a labor or5 ganization described in section 501(c)(5) if such com6 pensation is provided as a replacement for compensation 

7 not received by such member from such member’s em8 ployer as the result of a strike.’’. 

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

10 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

11 is amended by inserting the following new item after the 

12 item relating to section 139I: 

‘‘Sec. 139J. Compensation for lost wages relating to a strike.’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to compensation received after 

15 January 1, 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2005

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert E. Armour, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2005, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                   |  |                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ ROBERT E. ARMOUR                                                                                               |  | Date: November 14, 2005
|Robert E. Armour
Senior Vice President,
       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) |  |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting that signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. and will be retained by Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

---
#### Jesse LOVE, Jr., Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 70123.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 10, 1996.

*182Jesse Love, Jr., Pro Se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jesse Love, Jr., (“Movant”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 75.01 motion which asked the court to reconsider its denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. The State has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal contending that no appeal is possible from the denial of a Rule 75.01 motion. We agree. *See State v. Sielfleisch,*884 S.W.2d 422, 431 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). We therefore order Movant’s appeal dismissed.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30627

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODNEY POWELL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:01-CR-81-7

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodney Powell, federal prisoner # 27457-034, appeals the district court’s

denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence for conspiracy

to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and cocaine hydrochloride based

on Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines. He argues that the district

court abused its discretion when it denied his motion solely on the basis that his

original sentence was below both the original and amended guidelines ranges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 31, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 08-30627 Document: 00511067423 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2010
No. 08-30627

2

Although Powell has completed his term of imprisonment, he is currently

serving his term of supervised release. Accordingly, this appeal is not moot. See

Johnson v. Pettiford, 442 F.3d 917, 918 (5th Cir. 2006). We reject the

Government’s assertion that Powell waived the right to bring the instant appeal

under the terms of his plea agreement. See United States v. Cooley, 590 F.3d 293

(5th Cir. 2009).

A proceeding under § 3582(c)(2) is not a full resentencing. United States

v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 671 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed, (Jan. 28, 2010)

(No. 09-8939). Consequently, the bifurcated reasonableness review standard

afforded sentencing decisions is inapplicable in the § 3582(c)(2) context. Id. at

672. Rather, we review the district court’s determination of whether to reduce

a sentence for an abuse of discretion. Cooley, 590 F.3d at 297. Where, as here,

the record shows that the district court gave due consideration to the motion as

a whole and implicitly considered the factors in § 3553(a), we discern no abuse

of discretion. See id.; United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1010 (5th Cir.

1995).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 08-30627 Document: 00511067423 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2010
Description of Bonus Payments to Certain Current Executive Officers


 Exhibit 10.5 
 Bonus Payments to Certain Current Executive Officers and One Former Executive Officer of Franklin Resources, Inc. 
 The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Franklin Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) approved, on November 2, 2006, the Company’s payment of the following cash bonus amounts in connection with the
Company’s Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “AIP”) to, among others, the following current executive officers of the Company: Anne M. Tatlock, Vice Chairman and Member – Office of the Chairman of the
Company, $650,000; Vijay C. Advani, Executive Vice President – Global Advisor Services of the Company, $1,075,000; Murray L. Simpson, Executive Vice President of the Company, $250,000; William Y. Yun, Executive Vice President –
Institutional, $675,000; Jennifer J. Bolt, Executive Vice President – Operations and Technology, $750,000; and Kenneth A. Lewis, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, $227,500. The cash bonuses were earned
under the AIP for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. In addition to the cash bonuses set forth above, the Compensation Committee, pursuant to authority vested in the Compensation Committee under the Company’s 2002 Universal Stock
Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”), granted certain executive officers named above restricted stock awards, the material terms and conditions of which (other than the number of shares covered by the applicable award and the corresponding
vesting schedule) are in conformity with the 2002 Plan and the Company’s standard forms of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and Restricted Stock Award Agreement. 
 Separately, on November 2, 2006, the Compensation Committee approved the Company’s payment of a special bonus in the amount of $616,000 to James R. Baio, the Company’s former Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in recognition of his past services to the Company. The payment is subject to Mr. Baio executing a standard release agreement with the Company. Mr. Baio previously received, on October 20, 2006,
a separate cash bonus of $200,000 earned under the AIP for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24850-24851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12325]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice No. 2387]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Subcommittee for the Prevention 
of Marine Pollution; Notice of Meeting

    The Subcommittee for the Prevention of Marine Pollution (SPMP), a 
subcommittee of the Shipping Coordinating Committee, will conduct an 
open meeting on Tuesday, June 25, 1996, at 9:30 am in Room 2415 of the 
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC.
    The purpose of this meeting will be to review the agenda items to 
be considered at the thirty-eighth session of the Marine Environment 
Protection

[[Page 24851]]

Committee (MEPC 38) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to 
be held from July 1-10, 1996. Proposed U.S. position on the agenda 
items for MEPC 38 will be discussed.
    The major items for discussion will be the following:
    1. Development of a draft International Convention for the 
Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol 
of 1978 (MARPOL 73/78), Annex VI (Air Pollution) regulations.
    2. Work relating to the Human Element.
    3. Unwanted aquatic organisms in ballast water.
    4. Implementation of the International Convention on Oil Pollution 
Preparedness, Response and Cooperation (OPRC).
    5. Follow-up action to the United Nations Conference on Environment 
and Development (UNCED).
    6. Harmful effects of the use of antifouling paints for ships.
    7. Development of a ``Manual on Disposal of Ships Waste''.
    Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating 
capacity of the room.
    For further information or documentation pertaining to the SPMP 
meeting, contact Lieutenant Commander Ray Perry, U.S. Coast Guard 
Headquarters (G-MOS-4), 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-
0001, Telephone: (202) 267-2714.

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
Charles A. Mast,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-12325 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
#### American Lumber Company, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Employers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 19, 1956.

*560
      *Abraham M. Stanger*for appellant.

*Edward J. Hale*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff has appealed from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Such order is not appealable without permission (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 154; *Tannen*v. *Spritzer,*190 Misc. 442). Appeal may, of course, be taken as of right from the judgment entered on said order (see *Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.*v. *Mart,*284 App. Div. 668).

The appeal should be dismissed, with $10 costs.

Eder, Hecht and Aurelio, JJ., concur

Appeal dismissed, etc.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 11, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 11, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16A2113. LAURA PHILLIPS v. IOAN DONUTS HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a DUNKIN DONUTS.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of pSivida Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Soja, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 18, 2008



|                    |  |                                                    
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Soja
|Name:               |  | Michael J. Soja                                    
|Title:              |  | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-149572 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 26, 2009 (October 5, 2009 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 15), relating to the consolidated financial statements of AdvancedAnalogic Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to a) the Company’s adoption of Financial Accounting Standards BoardInterpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB No. 109*, and b) the restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,and our report relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting dated February 26, 2009 (October 5, 2009 as to the effects of the material weakness described in the third paragraph ofManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (as revised)), which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A of Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Jose, California 

October 5, 2009