alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Deerfield Capital Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

|                             |   | Date:  November 15, 2010 |
|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| /s/  JONATHAN W. TRUTTER         |   |                          |
| Jonathan  W. Trutter             |   |                          |
| Chief  Executive Officer         |   |                          |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)   |   |                          |
|                             |   |                          |
|                             |   | Date:  November 15, 2010 |
|                             |   |                          |
|                             |   |                          |
| /s/  KENNETH R. POSNER           |   |                          |
| Kenneth  R. Posner,              |   |                          |
| Interim  Chief Financial Officer |   |                          |
| (Principal  Financial Officer)   |   |                          |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 (the  "Report") of Parke  Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  we, Vito S. Pantilione,  President
and Chief Executive  Officer,  and Ernest D. Huggard,  Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopteD
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Bank.



/s/ Vito S. Pantilione                       /s/ Ernest D. Huggard
-------------------------------------        -----------------------------------
Vito S. Pantilione                           Ernest D. Huggard
President and Chief Executive Officer        Senior Vice President and Chief
(Principal Executive Officer)                Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                             Officer)


August 10, 2006
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the quarterly report of Peer Review Mediation and Arbitration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the        date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: December 4, 2008 | s/Willis Hale________________________

Willis Hale, Chief Executive Officer/Chief

Financial Officer |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit
      13**










Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street NE


Washington,
      DC 20549








Ladies
      and
      Gentlemen:




The
      certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
      Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) for the
      purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
      Title 18 of the United States Code.




Mr.
      K.V.
      Kamath, the Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Vishakha
      Mulye, the Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer of ICICI Bank Limited, each
      certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:




1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Exchange Act; and




2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ICICI
                Bank
                Limited.






Date:
      June
      11, 2007







/s/
                  K.V. KamathName:
                Mr. K.V. Kamath
              Managing
                Director & Chief Executive Officer/s/
                  Vishakha MulyeName:
                Ms. Vishakha Mulye
              Chief
                Financial Officer & Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.5



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. II

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City
Florida Holding Co. II (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 15, 2005



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPrincipal Executive Officer
#### Mary CARROLL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69715.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Aug. 27, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 1,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 19,1996.

Mary P. Carroll, St. Louis, for PlaintiffAp-pellant.

*416Tyrone A. Tabom, City Counselor, Edward J. Hanlon, Deputy City Counselor, Patricia Hageman, Assistant City Counselor, St. Louis, for Defendant/Respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, upholding an administrative decision of the Civil Service Commission, dismissing appellant from her employment with the City of St. Louis.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal fíne and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 14

- 00 317

- CV

Style: Pelco Construction Company v. Chambers County, Texas

Date motion filed * : November 3 , 2014

Type of motion s : Unopposed M otion to Abate the Appeal

Part ies filing motion s : Appell ant

Document to be filed: Supplemental or Complete Clerk’s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion s are :

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant’s motion to abate the appeal, until a supplemental or complete clerk’s record

can be filed, is dismissed as moot because the trial clerk filed i t on November 4, 2014.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: November 6, 2014
BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
                        Certified Public Accountant


1582 TULITA DRIVE                           OFFICE (702) 361-8414
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89123                    FAX NO. (702) 896-0278


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Whom It May Concern:
                                                          January 2, 2001

     The  firm  of  Barry  L. Friedman, P.C., Certified  Public  Accountant
consents  to  the inclusion of their report of  January 2,  2001,  on  the
Financial Statements of Rub Investments Limited, as of December 31, 2000, in
any filings  that are  necessary  now  or  in the near future with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,

/s/ Barry L. Friedman

Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50476 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JUAN JOSE CERVANTES

- GONZALEZ, also known as Jose Cervantes, also known as Jose Gonzalez, also known as Juan Cervantes

- Gonzalez, also known as Juan Cervantes, also known as Juan Cervantes Gonzalez, also known as Juan Gonzalez, also known as Juan Gonzalez

- Cervantes, also known as Juan Gonzalez Cervantes , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:18

- CR

- 581

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Jose Cervantes

- Gonzalez appeals his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States . He challenges the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment as invalid , contendi ng that h is initial removal order was void for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 31, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50476 Document: 00515253208 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/31/2019No. 19

- 50476

2 the failure of the notice to appear in the initial removal proceedin gs to specify a date for his removal hearing . He concedes that this challenge is foreclosed by United States v. Pedroza

- Rocha , 933 F .3d 490 (5th Cir. 2019), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Nov. 6, 2019) (No. 19

- 6588) , but he wishes to preserve it for furth er review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed under Pedroza

- Rocha

. Alternatively, the Government requests an extension of time to file its brief. Summary affirmance is appropriate if “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969) . This court concluded in Pedroza

- Rocha that the notice to
appear from the defendant’s prior removal proceedings was not deficient because it lacked a specific date for the hearing, that any such alleged deficiency had not deprived the immigration court o f jurisdiction, and that the defendant could not collaterally attack his notice to appear without first exhausting his administrative remedies. 933 F.3d at 496

- 98. Cervantes

Gonzalez’s arguments are, as he concedes, foreclosed by Pedroza

- Rocha

. See id. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-50476 Document: 00515253208 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/31/2019
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt & CompanyHoldings (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

•                  TheAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  Theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Date: September 23, 2003

 
| /s/  John J. Haley                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| John  J. Haley                              |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                        |
|                                        |
| /s/  Carl D. Mautz                          |   |
| Carl  D. Mautz                              |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Watson Wyatt & Company Holdings and will be retained byWatson Wyatt & Company Holdings and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

85

----
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joe Frank Cuellar, * From the 32nd District Court

of Nolan County

Trial Court No. 11383

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00079

- CR * June 8

, 2017

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C. J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Cause number: 01-18-01049-CV

Style: Mosaic Baybrook One, L.P., Mosaic Baybrook Two, L.P., and 

Mosaic Residential, Inc. v. Paul Simien

Type of motion: Motion to reconsider motion for rehearing en banc

Party filing motion: Appellants

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to reconsider the motion for rehearing en 

banc is denied. 

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Gordon Goodman_____

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, 

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: April 8, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH I FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH I Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2008



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)




34
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1272

MICHAEL A. MASON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA02-3667-RDB)

Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: September 7, 2004

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Donald R. Livingston, Richard

W. Black, Reed Lock Russell, AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD,

L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Mason appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for Home Depot on his racial discrimination and

retaliation based action. We affirm.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo.

Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th

Cir. 1988). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no

genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex

Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324-25 (1986). We must view the

factual evidence, and all justifiable inferences drawn therefrom,

in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Anderson v.

Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986). 

We conclude that viewing the evidence in the light most

favorable to Mason, Home Depot is entitled to summary judgment as

a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm based on the reasoning of

the district court. See Mason v. Home Depot USA, Inc., No. CA-02-

3667-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. Res. 311 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 16, 2010. 

Whereas the American National Red Cross, one of the most 

well-known humanitarian organizations in the world, was 

founded by Clara Barton in Washington, DC, on May 21, 

1881; 

Whereas the American National Red Cross received a congressional charter in 1905 setting forth the purposes of 

the organization, which include giving relief to and serving as a medium of communication between members of 

the Armed Forces of the United States and their families, and providing national and international disaster relief and mitigation; 

Whereas the American National Red Cross depends on the 

support of the people of the United States to accomplish 

the mission of the organization; 

Whereas the American National Red Cross has been at the 

forefront of helping individuals and families prevent, prepare for, and respond to disasters for more than 127 

years, including more than 70,000 disasters annually, 

ranging from apartment and single-family home fires, the 

most common type of disaster, to hurricanes, floods, 

earthquakes, wildfires, tornadoes, hazardous materials 

spills, transportation accidents, explosions, and other natural and human-caused disasters; 
2 

•HRES 311 EH 

Whereas, when a disaster strikes or is imminent, communities 

throughout the United States depend on the American 

National Red Cross to help meet the basic and urgent 

needs of affected individuals, including shelter, food, 

healthcare, and mental health services; 

Whereas the ‘‘Be Red Cross Ready’’ safety program encourages the people of the United States to take the 3 actions 

that will help them ‘‘Be Red Cross Ready’’ for a disaster: 

‘‘Get a Kit, Make a Plan, Be Informed’’; 

Whereas the ‘‘Be Red Cross Ready’’ safety program represents a major effort by the American National Red 

Cross to encourage the people of the United States to be 

more prepared for a disaster or other emergency; 

Whereas, since 1943, every President of the United States 

has proclaimed March to be ‘‘Red Cross Month’’; and 

Whereas the American National Red Cross uses Red Cross 

Month as an opportunity to promote the services and 

programs the organization provides to the people of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Red Cross 

Month; 

(2) recognizes the contributions of American National Red Cross volunteers in times of natural and 

human-caused disasters, and in times of armed conflict; 

and 
3 

•HRES 311 EH 

(3) encourages the people of the United States to 

‘‘Get a Kit, Make a Plan, and Be Informed’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5867 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5867

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, as the ``Colonel Joseph 
              William Kittinger II Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COLONEL JOSEPH WILLIAM KITTINGER II POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Colonel Joseph William Kittinger II Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
Joseph William Kittinger II Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```