alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 392 

Congratulating and commending Free Comic Book Day as an enjoyable and 

creative approach to promoting literacy and celebrating a unique American art form. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2009 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating and commending Free Comic Book Day as 

an enjoyable and creative approach to promoting literacy 

and celebrating a unique American art form. 

Whereas Free Comic Book Day promotes literacy by distributing free reading material on the first Saturday of May; 

Whereas Free Comic Book Day is dedicated to increasing 

awareness of and an interest in comics through an innovative marketing campaign; 

Whereas comics have proven to be a wonderful educational 

tool to help reluctant readers to take an interest in, and 

develop a life-long love of, reading; 

Whereas comic books are a fun and exciting way to introduce 

kids to reading and help children comprehend storylines; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 392 IH 

Whereas a growing number of schools are using comics to 

teach kids narration, dialogue, and visual design; 

Whereas the fastest growing section of public libraries is the 

comic book ‘‘graphic novel’’ section; and 

Whereas comics and graphic novels are increasingly being 

recognized as serious literature: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates and commends Free Comic Book Day as an en3 joyable and creative approach to promoting literacy and 

4 celebrating a unique American art form. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Darryl DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 69906.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 10, 1996.

Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Davis appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find both claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Adam S. Berger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Spark Networks plc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Adam S. Berger      |  | 
|Adam S. Berger          |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|May 10, 2007            |  |
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 22025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11929]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology

Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology; Meeting

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology's Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology (NIST) will meet 
on Tuesday, June, 11, 1996, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and on 
Wednesday, June 12, 1996, from 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. The Visiting 
Committee on Advanced Technology is composed of fifteen members 
appointed by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology who are eminent in such fields as business, research, new 
product development, engineering, labor, education, management 
consulting, environment, and international relations. The purpose of 
this meeting is to review and make recommendations regarding general 
policy for the Institute, its organization, its budget, and its 
programs within the framework of applicable national policies as set 
forth by the President and the Congress. On June 11, 1996, the agenda 
will include an update on NIST programs by NIST Director Prabhakar; 
presentations on strategic planning for Standards in Trade, Information 
Technology and Biotechnology; predictions about the future of the 
internet; impact of advancing technology on metrology needs; and a 
laboratory tour. On June 12, 1996, the agenda will include 
presentations on the ATP Focused Program, Tools for DNA Diagnostics and 
the Baldrige Pilot Programs in Education and Health Care.

DATES: The meeting will convene June 11, 1996, at 8:30 a.m., and will 
adjourn at 9:30 a.m. on June 12, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Employees Lounge (seating 
capacity 80, includes 38 participants), Administration Building, at 
NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris E. Kuyatt, Visiting Committee Executive Director, NIST, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, telephone number (301) 975-6090.

    Dated: May 7, 1996.
Samuel Kramer,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 96-11929 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11286]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Corps of Engineers


Notice of Availability of Surplus Land and Buildings as 
Prescribed by Public Law 101-510 and Required by Public Law 100-526, 
Located at Rio Vista Army Reserve Facility, Rio Vista, CA

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, on 
behalf of the Department of the Army identifies as surplus the real 
property located at Rio Vista Army Reserve Facility, Rio Vista, 
California. Rio Vista Army Reserve Facility is located in Sonoma 
County, on the Sacramento River approximately 20 miles southeast of 
Travis Air Force Base, between Lodi and Fairfield, California. The 
Facility is comprised of 27.8 acres and includes 22 temporary wood-
frame buildings and miscellaneous improvements. The property is being 
conveyed to the City of Rio Vista as authorized by the National Defense 
Authorizations Act of 1995, Section 2834.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Karen Fisbeck, Army Corps of Engineers, Real Estate Division, 1325 
J Street, Sacramento, CA 91814-2922, telephone (916) 557-6844, fax 
(916) 557-7855; or Mr. Norman Repanich, City Hall, P.O. Box 745, Rio 
Vista, CA 94571, telephone (707) 374-6451.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11286 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-EZ-M
IV 

House Calendar No. 50 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 400 

[Report No. 111–96] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend the Truth 

in Lending Act to reform consumer mortgage practices and provide 

accountability for such practices, to provide certain minimum standards 

for consumer mortgage loans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2009 

Ms. PINGREE of Maine, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend 

the Truth in Lending Act to reform consumer mortgage 

practices and provide accountability for such practices, 

to provide certain minimum standards for consumer 

mortgage loans, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for considermstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 400 RH 

1 ation of the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend the Truth in Lend2 ing Act to reform consumer mortgage practices and pro3 vide accountability for such practices, to provide certain 

4 minimum standards for consumer mortgage loans, and for 

5 other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dis6 pensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

7 the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 

8 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the 

9 bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and con10 trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

11 Committee on Financial Services. After general debate, 

12 the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No 

13 further consideration of the bill shall be in order except 

14 pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 50 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 400 

[Report No. 111–96] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1728) 

loans, and for other purposes. minimum standards for consumer mortgage countability for such practices, to provide certain consumer mortgage practices and provide acto amend the Truth in Lending Act to reform 

MAY 5, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### James KINDELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 67015.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 25, 1995.

Nancy L. Vincent, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harvey Lalach, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anavex Life Sciences
      Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | the information contained in the quarterly report on Form
      10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Anavex Life Sciences
Corp.                           

Date: May 16, 2011

/s/Harvey
LalachHarvey Lalach President, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and
Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12290]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00838]


Winona Knitting Mills, Inc., Berwick Knitwear (Formerly Komar & 
Sons Berwick Knitwear) Berwick, Pennsylvania; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of April 16, 1996, the company official requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA-
Transitional Adjustment Assistance for workers of the subject firm. The 
denial notice was signed on April 8, 1996 and will soon be published in 
the Federal Register.
    The company official presents evidence that the Department's survey 
of the subject firm's customers was incomplete.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. the application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 27th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-12290 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                       59
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             59
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               59
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    39,847
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                 10,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                              (50,563)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 59
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        234,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (234,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (234,531)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.02)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12059]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the meeting of the National Cancer 
Institute Board of Scientific Advisors Cancer Centers Program Working 
Group, May 24, 1996 at the Crystal City Marriott, 1999 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA.
    This meeting will be closed to the public from 8:30 am to 
adjournment for discussion of confidential issues relating to the 
review, discussion and evaluation of individual programs and projects 
conducted by the Cancer Centers Extramural Program. These discussions 
will reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information including consideration 
of personnel qualifications and performance, the competence of 
individual investigators and similar matters, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Information pertaining to the meeting may be obtained from Dr. 
Paulette Gray, Executive Secretary, National Cancer Institute Board of 
Scientific Advisors, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
EPN, Rm. 600, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301-496-4218).

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-12059 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
  (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended February 28,2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 
 
 /s/ John Karlsson
 John Karlsson
 Chief Executive Officer
 Chief Financial Officer
 October 16, 2009
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lee Michael Beitman,

Plaintiff,

v. 

S. Herrick, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-08229-PCT-JAT

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for a form to order transcripts. The 

Court will grant the request and direct the Clerk’s office to send Plaintiff a form. 

However, Plaintiff should note that upon returning the form, he must either pay the 

fees or show that he is entitled to transcripts at government expense. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f)

(“Fees for transcripts furnished in other proceedings to persons permitted to appeal in 

forma pauperis shall also be paid by the United States if the trial judge or a circuit judge 

certifies that the appeal is not frivolous (but presents a substantial question)” (parenthetical 

in original); Henderson v. United States, 734 F.2d 483, 484 (9th Cir. 1984) (a request for 

a transcript at government expense should not be granted unless “the appeal presents a 

substantial issue.”). Plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating nonfrivolity and 

substantiality of the claims. See Maloney v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 396 F.2d 939, 

940 (D.C. Cir. 1967). The language in § 753(f) suggests that the inquiries of frivolity and 

substantiality are not identical. Corgain v. Miller states that a claim is frivolous “if the 

petitioner can make no rational argument in law or facts to support his claim for relief.” 

Case 3:17-cv-08229-JAT Document 305 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

708 F.2d 1241, 1247 (7th Cir. 1983). On the other hand, a “substantial” question is defined 

as “reasonably debatable.” Maloney, 396 F.2d at 940 (citing Ortiz v. Greyhound Corp., 192 

F. Supp. 903, 905 (D. Md. 1959)).

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a transcript order form (Doc. 302) is 

granted; the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a transcript order form. However, 

transcripts shall not be prepared and sent to Plaintiff unless Plaintiff pays the fees or the 

Court orders the transcripts be prepared at government expense in a subsequent order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for trial transcripts (Doc. 

304) is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff following the procedure outlined in this Order.

Dated this 6th day of June, 2022.

Case 3:17-cv-08229-JAT Document 305 Filed 06/06/22 Page 2 of 2