alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.4 AMENDMENT/CHANGE CONTROL SEVERANCE AGRMT.



 

\




Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT TO




CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Change of Control Severance Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered
into by and between Arthur W. Beckman (“Executive”) and Indus International, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation (the “Company”), effective as of October 20, 2006.



RECITALS




     1. The Company and Executive have entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement with an
effective date of May 5, 2005, as previously amended (the “Agreement”);



     2. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders to offer the Executive this Amendment;



AMENDMENT




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued
employment of Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows:



     1. Amended and Restated Section 1. Section 1 is hereby amended and restated to read
as follows:



     1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be for a one year term; provided,
however, that upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, the term of the Agreement
automatically shall be extended to terminate on the second anniversary of the Change of
Control. In addition, the Compensation Committee may affirmatively extend the
term of the Agreement at any time. The Executive may, by notice to the Company given not
less than 60 days, but not more than 90 days, prior to the expiration of the then-current
term, cause the term of this Agreement not to be extended. In the event that the
Compensation Committee does not extend the term of the Agreement, or upon such notice of
non-renewal by the Executive, the term of this Agreement shall terminate upon the expiration
of the then-current term, including any prior extensions.



     2. Miscellaneous Provisions.



     (a) Definitions; Integration. Any capitalized term not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meaning given such term in the Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Agreement,
constitutes the entire understanding of the parties as regards to the subject matter hereof and
cannot be modified except by further written agreement of the parties.



     (b) Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the
Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Gregory J. Dukat	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and CEO	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	October 20, 2006	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Arthur W. Beckman	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	EVP and CTO	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	October 20, 2006
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thrifty PrintingInc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harvey Lalach, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 9, 2006

/S/ Harvey Lalach

Harvey Lalach
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5984 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through 

the Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration, 

to award grants for expanding, modernizing, or streamlining emergency 

room operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

Mr. LAWLER (for himself and Mr. ESPAILLAT) introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

acting through the Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration, to award grants 

for expanding, modernizing, or streamlining emergency 

room operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Streamline Emergency 

5 Care Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5984 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY ROOM OPERATIONS. 

2 (a) AWARDS.—The Secretary of Health and Human 

3 Services (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’), 

4 acting through the Administrator of the Health Resources 

5 and Services Administration, shall carry out a program 

6 of awarding grants to eligible entities for expanding, mod7 ernizing, or streamlining emergency room operations. 

8 (b) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—In this section, the term 

9 ‘‘eligible entity’’ means a health care provider that— 

10 (1) is a nonprofit organization; and 

11 (2) at the time of applying for a grant under 

12 this section, is already operating an emergency 

13 room. 

14 (c) AMOUNT.—The amount of a grant under sub15 section (a) shall not exceed $500,000. 

16 (d) USE OF FUNDS.—A grant received under this 

17 section may be used for any of the following: 

18 (1) The hiring of individuals to work in the 

19 emergency room. 

20 (2) The purchase of equipment to optimize and 

21 modernize emergency room capacity. 

22 (3) Triage and other training to increase the 

23 capacity of existing personnel to assist in the emer24 gency room. 

25 (e) REPORT.—Not later than the end of the third fis26 cal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5984 IH

1 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy 

2 and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the 

3 Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of 

4 the Senate a report on the effectiveness and impacts of 

5 the grant program under this section. 

6 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry 

7 out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated 

8 $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Alvie Copeland Kiles, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-17-04092-PHX-GMS

DEATH-PENALTY CASE 

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is Respondents’ Motion for an Order to Preclude 

Defense Team from Contacting Victims (Doc. 12), which is fully briefed. (Docs. 27–28.) 

The Court addresses the motion as follows. 

 Respondents ask the Court to enter an order “precluding Petitioner Alvie Copeland 

Kiles’ defense team from directly contacting any victim in this proceeding.” (Doc. 12 at 

1.) In support of their request, Respondents cite provisions of state and federal law, 

including A.R.S. § 13–4433(B), which provides that “[t]he defendant, the defendant’s 

attorney or an agent of the defendant shall only initiate contact with the victim through 

the prosecutor’s office,” and the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), which gives state 

crime victims in federal habeas cases “the right to be treated with fairness and with 

respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). Kiles opposes the 

motion, arguing that (1) Respondents’ proposed procedure will interfere with his 

attorneys’ statutory and ethical obligations to conduct a thorough investigation; (2) 

Respondents do not represent the victims and cannot assert their rights; (3) compliance 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

with A.R.S. § 13–4433(B) is not expressly authorized by federal law; and (4) granting 

Respondents’ requested relief would be premature. (Doc. 27.) 

 Regardless of whether A.R.S. § 13–4433(B) directly applies to these proceedings, 

the Court finds that the statute provides a reasonable mechanism to facilitate contact 

between Kiles’ defense team and victims that is consistent with the purposes of the 

CVRA. Using counsel for Respondents to channel requests to contact victims does not 

unduly burden Kiles’ access to the victims. See, e.g., Chappell v. Ryan, No. CV-15-

00478-PHX-SPL (D. Ariz. Jul. 21, 2015). 

 For the reasons set forth above, 

 IT IS ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Order to Preclude Defense Team 

from Contacting Victims (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. No person who is defined as a victim 

in this matter pursuant to Arizona law shall be contacted by anyone working with or on 

behalf of Petitioner or Petitioner’s counsel unless the victim, through counsel for 

Respondents, has consented to such contact. If consent is not provided and Petitioner 

nonetheless believes contact is necessary, Petitioner may file a motion with the Court 

explaining the necessity for such contact and further addressing the applicability of 

Arizona’s provisions governing the rights of victims. 

 Dated this 20th day of April, 2018. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge
#### Michael A. BUTNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41420.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 18, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 29, 1989.

Sean D. O’Brien, Public Defender, John L. Vohs, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William Webster, Atty. Gen., John Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SHANGLER, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial, without evidentiary hearing, of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5862 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 relating to 

authority of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

consolidate, modify, or reorganize Customs revenue functions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5862 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER 

2 PROTECTION TO CONSOLIDATE, MODIFY, OR 

3 REORGANIZE CUSTOMS REVENUE FUNC4 TIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 412 of the Homeland Se6 curity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 212(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)— 

8 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

9 (i) by striking ‘‘consolidate, dis10 continue,’’ and inserting ‘‘discontinue’’; 

11 and 

12 (ii) by inserting after ‘‘reduce the 

13 staffing level’’ the following: ‘‘below the op14 timal staffing level determined in the most 

15 recent Resource Allocation Model required 

16 by section 301(h) of the Customs Proce17 dural Reform and Simplification Act of 

18 1978 (19 U.S.C. 2075(h))’’; and 

19 (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, Na20 tional Account Managers, International Trade 

21 Analysts’’ after ‘‘Financial Systems Special22 ists’’; and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(d) AUTHORITY TO CONSOLIDATE, MODIFY, OR RE25 ORGANIZE CUSTOMS REVENUE FUNCTIONS.— 
3 

•HR 5862 EH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of U.S. 

2 Customs and Border Protection may, subject to sub3 section (b), consolidate, modify, or reorganize cus4 toms revenue functions delegated to the Commis5 sioner under subsection (a), including by adding 

6 such functions to existing positions or establishing 

7 new or modifying existing job series, grades, titles, 

8 or classifications for personnel, and associated sup9 port staff, performing such functions, in consultation 

10 with the Office of Personnel Management. 

11 ‘‘(2) POSITION CLASSIFICATION STANDARDS.— 

12 At the request of the Commissioner, the Director of 

13 the Office of Personnel Management shall establish 

14 new position classification standards for any new po15 sitions established by the Commissioner under para16 graph (1).’’. 

17 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 412(a)(1) of 

18 the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 212(a)(1)) 

19 is amended by striking ‘‘403(a)(1)’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘403(1)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 17, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5862 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 reCustoms revenue functions. Protection to consolidate, modify, or reorganize lating to authority of U.S. Customs and Border
#### Diane Marie DIFFEY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Kenneth Ray DIFFEY, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65344.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 29, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 10, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 21, 1995.

Terry J. Flanagan, P.C., Alan Jay Kosh-ner, St. Louis, for appellant.

Louis Jerry Weber, Thurman, Howald, Weber, Bowles & Senkel, Hillsboro, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals those portions of the order of dissolution of her marriage to husband pertaining to the division of property, the failure to award maintenance and the denial of attorney fees. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24996-24997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12368]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2389]


Office of Overseas Schools; Information Collection Under Review

    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval is being sought for 
the information collection listed below. This proposed information 
collection was previously published in the Federal Register and allowed 
60 days for public comment.
    The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for 
public comments from the date listed at the top of this page in the 
Federal Register. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 Code 
of Federal Regulation, Part 1320.10.

1. Summary

    The Office of Overseas Schools of the Department of State (A/OS) is

[[Page 24997]]

responsible: (a) for supporting our overseas missions by determining 
that adequate educational opportunities exist for dependents of U.S. 
government personnel stationed abroad and when necessary providing 
financial and technical assistance to improve elementary and secondary 
education at post for USG dependents; and (b) for assisting American-
sponsored overseas schools to demonstrate U.S. educational philosophy 
and practice. The following summarizes the information collection 
proposal submitted to OMB:
    Type of request--Reinstatement.
    Originating office--Office of Overseas Schools.
    Title of information collection--U.S. State Department.
    Overseas School--Grant Status Report.
    Frequency--Annually.
    Form Number--JF-61.
    Respondents--The 190 Overseas American sponsored schools.
    Estimated number of respondents--190.
    Average hours per response--0.25.
    Total estimated burden hours--47.50.
    44 U.S.C. 3504(h) does not apply.

Additional Information or Comments

    Copies of the proposed forms and supporting documents may be 
obtained from Charles S. Cunningham (202) 647-0596. Comments and 
questions should be directed to (OMB) Jefferson Hill (202) 395-3176.

    Dated: May 1, 1996.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-12368 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-M
Unassociated Document


    
      

    

     

    Exhibit
      10.1

     

    AMENDMENT
      TO

    GROUP
      PURCHASING PROGRAM AGREEMENT

     

    THIS AMENDMENT to the Group Purchasing Program Agreement of October 28,
      2004 is made and entered into as of October 20, 2006, by and between Henry
      Schein, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HSI”)
      and VeriChip
      Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“VeriChip”).

     

    WITNESSETH:

     

    WHEREAS, VeriChip and HSI are parties to a Group Purchasing Program
      Agreement (the “Original
      Agreement”);
      and

     

    WHEREAS, HSI and VeriChip desire to extend the term of the Original
      Agreement.

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
      contained herein, HSI and VeriChip agree as follows:

     

    1.    Term
      of
      Agreement. Section 1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended by
      replacing the words “two (2)
      years” with the words
“two
      years and three
      months.”

     

    2.    No
      Other
      Changes. Except as specifically provided in paragraph 1, all terms
      of the Original Agreement shall remain in effect and shall not be modified
      hereby, and provisions regarding notices and governing law contained in the
      Original Agreement shall apply to this Amendment as well.

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement under seal
      effective the date first written above.

     

           HENRY
      SCHEIN, INC.                    VERICHIP
      CORPORATION

     

          
By:  /s/ Louis J.
      Ferraro                                By: 
      /s/
      Kevin
      McLaughlin                          


                 
Name: Louis J. Ferraro                    
Kevin
      McLaughlin

                 
      Title:  VP and General
      Manager                                    
CEO

                       Medical
      Group

     

     

     

    1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24330-24331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12010]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 24331]]


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Center for Waste Reduction Technologies

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 18, 1996, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Center for Waste Reduction 
Technologies (``CWRT'') filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, ACS Industries, Inc., Woonsocket, RI, and B&V Waste 
Science and Technology Corp., Kansas City, MO have withdrawn from 
membership and AM-RE Services, Inc., Princeton, NJ; Argonne National 
Laboratory, Argonne, IL; Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, TN; GE 
Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, NY; Los Alamos 
National Laboratory of the University of California, Los Alamos, NM; 
Merck & Company, Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ; Rohm and Haas Company, 
Philadelphia, PA; and SmithKline Beecham, King of Prussia, PA have 
become members.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of CWRT. Membership remains open, and CWRT intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. 
Information regarding participation in this point venture may be 
obtained from Center for Waste Reduction Technologies, 345 East 47th 
Street, New York, NY 10017-2395.
    On March 14, 1995, CWRT filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register on April 24, 1995 (60 FR 20119).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-12010 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:				          (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended February 29, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				          (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.*/s/ John Karlsson*John Karlsson					Chief Executive Officer				Chief Financial Officer				April 21, 2008				A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

****

----
Case 2:17-mj-07542-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-07542-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-07542-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-07542-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-07542-BSB Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit No. 32.2

Form 10-KSB
Elva International, Inc.
File No. 000-29201


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Elva International, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
Misko, Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent  thereof) of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: April 8, 2004

                            By: /s/ Patrick Misko
                            ---------------------------------
                            Eric Patrick Misko
                            Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Elva International, Inc. and will be retained by Elva International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.