alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  BioForce  Nanosciences
Holdings,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30,
2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Eric  Henderson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   ERIC HENDERSON
----------------------------
Eric Henderson
Chief Executive Officer
November 17, 2006



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's   Form   10-QSB/A   solely   pursuant   to  section  906  of  the
     Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002  (subsections  (a) and  (b) of  section  1350,
     chapter 63 of title 18,  United States Code) and is not being filed as part
     of the Form 10-QSB/A or as a separate disclosure document.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4029

_____________________________

JOHN D. SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

PAMELA JO BONDI, in her official 

capacity as Attorney General of 

the State of Florida,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Charles W. Dodson, Judge.

October 26, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Scott E. Siverson, Orlando, for Appellant.

Russell S. Kent, Special Counsel for Litigation, Office of the 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Annunziata, McClanahan and Senior Judge Coleman 

WILLIE MAE HANSELL 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2735-03-1 PER CURIAM 

 MARCH 9, 2004 

GAMES FARMERS MARKET AND 

 EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Willie Mae Hansell, pro se, on brief). 

 (Stephen A. Strickler; Inman & Strickler, PLC, on brief), for 

appellees. 

 Willie Mae Hansell appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission 

denying her Claim for Benefits for carpal tunnel syndrome. We have reviewed the record and 

the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Hansell v. Games Farmers Market, VWC File 

No. 210-26-59 (Oct. 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Henry J.
Fuchs M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Company"), and Eric H. Bjerkholt, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

      1. The Company's amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
      December 31, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
      (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and

      2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
      of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operations of
      the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.

Dated: June 24, 2003

/s/ Henry J. Fuchs                                       /s/ Eric H. Bjerkholt
-----------------------                                  -----------------------
Henry J. Fuchs M.D.                                      Eric H. Bjerkholt
Chief Executive Officer                                  Chief Financial Officer


Note: This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, it
is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19094-19095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10620]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on May 22, 1996, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and matters 
the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Wednesday, May 22, 1996--1:30 p.m. until 4:00 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. It may also discuss the status of appointment of members to 
the ACRS.

[[Page 19095]]

The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant 
issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and actions, as 
appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: April 24, 1996.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 96-10620 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
EX-32
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PATRICK A. GALLIHER AND ARTHUR DE JOYA

                     SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of RMD Technologies, Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to their knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: April 14, 2006                  By: /s/  Patrtick A. Galliher
                                       Patrick A. Galliher, President



Dated: April 14, 2006                  By: /s/  Arthur De Joya
                                       Arthur De Joya,
                                       Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-31053

Summary Calendar

 

JORGE ANIBAL GALVEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

 

(01-CV-200)

March 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Anibal Galvez appeals the denial of his habeas petition,

in which he sought to challenge the validity of his 1999

deportation order. Galvez contends that his New York state court

conviction of sexual abuse of a minor, a misdemeanor under state

law, was incorrectly classified as an aggravated felony for

immigration law purposes. He asserts that the district court had

jurisdiction to consider his contention. Galvez’s New York
1 United States v. Urias-Escobar, 2002 WL 87572 (5th Cir.).

conviction was an aggravated felony because the term of

imprisonment was one year.1 Accordingly, we AFFIRM the denial of

his habeas petition.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**MMC
      ENERGY, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MMC Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl W. Miller, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      MMC Energy, Inc. and will be retained by MMC Energy, Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


May
                15, 2007/s/
                Karl W. MillerKarl
                W. MillerChief
                Executive Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or
      as a
      separate disclosure document.
**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (i) | the                  Quaterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company, for the nine months                  ended                  August 31st,                  2007, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the                  “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (ii) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | */s/                Graham G Alexander*                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                         |
| Name:  | GRAHAM                G. ALEXANDER                                           |
|   |                                                                         |
| Title: | Chief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
|   |                                                                         |
| Date:  | March                28th                ,                2008               |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be      retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange      Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This      certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated      by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of      1933      or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date      of      the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained      in such filing.*

----
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Transition Report on Form 10-QSB of PARA MAS INTERNET,
INC. (the "COMPANY"), for  the  transition period ended December 31,  2003,  as
Filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"),   I,   Gary  Whiting,  Principal  Executive  Officer  and  Principal
Financial Officer of the  Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby  certify,
to my knowledge that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gary Whiting
--------------------------------------------
Gary Whiting
Principal  Executive  Officer
Principal  Financial  Officer

Dated:     September 17,  2004
A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  PARA MAS INTERNET, INC. and will be retained by PARA MAS INTERNET,
INC. and furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12537]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-13242]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (The UniMark Group, Inc., Common Stock, $0.01 Par 
Value)

May 14, 1996.
    The UniMark Group, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the Pacific 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``PSE'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, since its initial public offering in 
August 1994, the Company has changed its primary trading market from 
the Nasdaq Small-Cap Market to the Nasdaq National Market System 
(Nasdaq/NMS). Consequently, substantially all of the trading in the 
Company's securities is effectuated on the Nasdaq/NMS. Therefore, the 
Board of Directors believes that the Nasdaq/NMS provides the Company's 
stockholders with a well-established and liquid trading market to 
effectuate transactions in the Company's securities.
    The Company believes the costs involved in maintaining the PSE as a 
secondary trading market for its securities outweighs the benefits to 
the Company's stockholders, particularly in light of the historic 
trading volume of the Company's securities on the PSE.
    Any interested person may, on or before June 5, 1996 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549, facts bearing upon whether the 
application has been made in accordance with the rules of the exchanges 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12537 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6287

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN JERMAINE MELVIN, a/k/a Baby-Boy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CR-94-139-5-2-F, CA-98-950-5-F)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 16, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Jermaine Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Stuart Wilson, OFFICE OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jermaine Melvin appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) motion. Our review of the

record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Melvin, Nos. CR-94-139-5-2-F; CA-98-950-5-F

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Arthur V. Jennings, as Administrator of the Estate of Walter F. Jennings, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

June 28, 1956.

*Anthony B. Cataldo*for administrator.

*Vigdor & Locker*for Josephine Jennings and another.

Maximilian Moss, S.

This is an application by the respondent to tax a bill of costs on the affirmance by the Court of Appeals of a determination of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court which affirmed a decree of this court.

*602By an order dated November 17, 1955 the Court of Appeals granted the appellants leave to prosecute their appeal as poor persons. On the affirmance in the Appellate Division of the decree made by this court, a decree was entered herein on October 20, 1955 which directed the appellants to pay the amount of the bill of costs allowed to the respondent on August 4,, 1955. The appeal in the Appellate Division was not prosecuted as poor persons. The proposed bill seeks an allowance of costs on the appeal to the Court of Appeals and costs and allowances pursuant to section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act for contest of the appeals to the Appellate Division and to the Court of Appeals. Section 1493 of the Civil Practice Act provides that no costs may be awarded against persons authorized to proceed as poor persons. Where persons *in forma pauperis*are authorized to initiate proceedings the statute protects them from the expenses of the litigation. *(Weltman*v. *Posenecker,*19 Misc. 592, 593; *Wilson*v. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*167 Misc. 853, judgment revd. and order affd., 168 Misc. 125; *Stevenson*v. *Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America,*175 Misc. 823, 825.) This court therefore cannot make allowances of costs for the proceeding in the Court of Appeals. The proposed bill of costs seeks now in effect to retax the prior bill of costs of August 4, 1955 after the entry of a decree based thereon. This likewise cannot be allowed.

The attention of counsel is again directed to the decision of this court of August 4, 1955 relative to allowances to be made herein. The court’s policy with respect thereto will not be modified. This proposed bill of costs is therefore denied in all respects.