alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), Henry J. Fuchs, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company), and Kathleen A. Stafford, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge: 1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic Report
and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing. In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 10th day of
March, 2005. /s/ Henry J. Fuchs
    
    /s/ Kathleen A. StaffordHenry J. Fuchs, M.D.
    
    Kathleen A. StaffordChief Executive Officer
    
    Principal Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code has
been provided to IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by IntraBiotics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/ John Boschert       
| | ------ | ------------------------
| |        |                         
| | Name:  | John Boschert           
| |        |                         
| | Title: | Secretary, Treasurer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer 
| |        |                         
| | Date:  | May 16, 2005            

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Daniel D. Drummond, certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Wren, Inc.  2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.     The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.     The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  September 25, 2007  /s/ Daniel D. Drummond Daniel D. Drummond President and CEO, CFO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1970

MUSTAFA H. SA’ID,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, et al; BEST

BUY, INC.; COUNTY OF FAIRFAX POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al; D. A. CROOKE, Sergeant, individually; J. THOMAS MANGER, Colonel, individually; ERIC HANTE, Officer, individually;

BRIAN J. MCANDREW, Lieutenant, individually;

LEON G. WILLIAMS, Major; THOMAS RYAN, Captain,

individually; ARTHUR J. HURLOCK, JR., individually; THOMAS E. TYMAN, individually; CHARLES

K. PETERS, Captain, individually; WILLIAMS

AUDREY M. SLYMAN, Major, individually; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al, Workers Compensation Commissioners; SUSAN A. CUMMINS,

individually,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa Carroll Buchanan,

Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr., and Barry R. Poretz, Magistrate Judges.

(CA-01-677-A)

Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 11, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Mustafa H. Sa’id, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Gouldin Killalea, COUNTY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia; Louis Edward Matthews, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mustafa H. Sa’id appeals the district court’s orders dismissing several Defendants in this civil action, prohibiting discovery

by Sa’id pending further order of the court, and directing Sa’id to

appear for a hearing. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither

final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
H. Res. 400 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 6, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend the Truth in Lending Act to 

reform consumer mortgage practices and provide accountability for such practices, to provide certain minimum standards for consumer mortgage loans, and for other purposes. 

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General 

debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 

hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. 

After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall rise 
2 

•HRES 400 EH 

without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be 

in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.2
  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BMX Development Corp. (FKA
Biometrix International, Inc.) for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Dean A. Stewart, our Chief Financial Officer, certify
that:
 
 *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
 
  /s/
Dean A. Stewart
 Dean A.
Stewart
 
 
 November
12, 2008
 
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-60094

Summary Calendar

DANIEL GEORGE CORRING,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PEARL RIVER COUNTY; RITA LUMPKIN,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:11-CV-262

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel George Corring, Mississippi prisoner # 170298, appeals the 

dismissal on summary judgment of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that 

his constitutional rights were violated by the defendants’ deliberate 

indifference to his serious medical needs when he was a detainee in the Pearl 

River County jail. We affirm.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-60094 Document: 00512478886 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2013
No. 13-60094

We find no basis in the record for crediting the complaint’s conclusory 

contentions that Rita Lumpkin was deliberately indifferent to Corring’s 

medical needs. See Hathaway v. Bazany, 507 F.3d 312, 319 (5th Cir. 2007).

The record shows at most that Corring disagreed with Lumpkin about his 

treatment regimen or that she was arguably negligent or committed 

malpractice, none of which constitutes a sufficient basis for casting Lumpkin 

in judgment under § 1983. See Stewart v. Murphy, 174 F.3d 530, 534 (5th Cir. 

1999); Banuelos v. McFarland, 41 F.3d 232, 235 (5th Cir. 1995). Additionally,

as Corring failed to establish an underlying constitutional violation by 

Lumpkin, i.e., deliberate indifference by her to his serious medical needs, Pearl 

River County cannot be liable on his theory that it had an official policy of 

failing to train its agents. See Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss., 74 F.3d 633, 649 

n.4 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The judgment is AFFIRMED. Corring’s motions for oral argument and 

for appointment of counsel are DENIED. 

2

 Case: 13-60094 Document: 00512478886 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2013
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 280 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 280

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 25, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 146) to establish a battlefield 
acquisition grant program for the acquisition and protection of nationally 
significant battlefields and associated sites of the Revolutionary War and the 
War of 1812, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to 
consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order except those 
arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single motion offered by the chair of the 
Committee on Natural Resources or his designee that the House concur in the 
Senate amendments. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as 
read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final 
adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-41032

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL REYES-CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-95-CR-191-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Manuel Reyes-Cruz appeals from the denial of his motion

to dismiss the charge of illegal-reentry of an alien following

deportation that is pending against him. Reyes contends that the

Double Jeopardy Clause bars further prosecution because our

previous holding that the district court failed to ascertain a

factual basis for the entry of Reyes’s guilty plea is tantamount

to a holding that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conviction.
No. 96-41032

-2-

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and we find not reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

essentially the reasons relied upon by the district court. 

United States v. Reyes-Cruz, No. B-95-CR-191-1 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 9,

1996).

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 5, 2020

No s . 04

- 19

- 00377

- CR & 04

- 19

- 0037 8

- CR

Joshua PIEPER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Ap pellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No s . 2018CR2080 & 2018CR2081

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On January 31, 2020, appellant filed a Motion to Amend Appellant’s Brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of February, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12201]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of Vote To Close Meeting

    At its meeting on May 6, 1996, the Board of Governors of the United 
States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public observation 
its meeting scheduled for June 3, 1996, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 
The members will consider a filing with the Postal Rate Commission for 
classification reform of special services.
    The meeting is expected to be attended by the following persons: 
Governors Alvarado, Daniels, del Junco, Dyhrkopp, Fineman, Mackie, 
McWherter, Rider and Winters; Postmaster General Runyon, Deputy 
Postmaster General Coughlin, Secretary to the Board Koerber, and 
General Counsel Elcano.
    The Board determined that pursuant to section 552b(c)(3) of title 
5, United States Code, and section 7.3(c) of title 39, Code of Federal 
Regulations, this portion of the meeting is exempt from the open 
meeting requirement of the Government in the Sunshine Act [5 U.S.C. 
552b(b)] because it is likely to disclose information in connection 
with proceedings under Chapter 36 of title 39, United States Code 
(having to do with postal ratemaking, mail classification and changes 
in postal services), which is specifically exempted from disclosure by 
section 410(c)(4) of title 39, United States Code.
    The Board has determined further that pursuant to section 
552b(c)(10) of title 5, United States Code, and section 7.3(j) of title 
39, Code of Federal Regulations, the discussion is exempt because it is 
likely to specifically concern participation of the Postal Service in a 
civil action or proceeding involving a determination on the record 
after opportunity for a hearing.
    The Board further determined that the public interest does not 
require that the Board's discussion of these matters be open to the 
public.
    In accordance with section 552b(f)(1) of title 5, United States 
Code, and section 7.6(a) of title 39, Code of Federal Regulations, the 
General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that 
in her opinion the meeting may properly be closed to public observation 
pursuant to section 552b(c) (3) and (10) of title 5, United States 
Code; section 410(c)(4) of title 39, United States Code; and section 
7.3 (c) and (j) of title 39, Code of Federal Regulations.
    Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to 
the Secretary of the Board, Thomas J. Koerber, at (202) 268-4800.
Thomas J. Koerber,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12201 Filed 5-10-96; 1:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
```
CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Graham G. Alexander, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Rancho Santa Monica Developments Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (i)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal
            quarter ended February 28th, 2006, and to which this certification
            is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                  By:     /s/ GRAHAM G. ALEXANDER
                          -------------------------------------------
                  Name:   GRAHAM G. ALEXANDER

                  Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                          Officer

                  Date:   March 7th, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
Order entered April 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00612-CR

GERONIMO DELGADO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-61529-H

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s April 5, 2013 motion to extend time to file its brief. We 

ORDER the State’s brief received on April 5, 2013 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE