alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 7, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00084

- CV

C. G. and W. G. , Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFOR E JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on February 9, 2023

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. Because appellant s are

indigent and u n able to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Age Translation, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Fahlberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 15th day of May, 2006.



| | JOHN FAHLBERG                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | John Fahlberg                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. M A R C O S G O N Z A L E Z R O M E R O , a. k. a. M ar c o R om e r o G onz a l e z , a . k. a . G ua da l upe R am i rez, a. k . a. T o rt as, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t, N o. 10- 50586 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 4 4 5 - D SF ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a l e S . F i s c he r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J anuary17, 2012 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . M ar cos G on za l ez R om er o app ea l s f rom the 29 1-m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f orR a c ke t e e rI nf

l ue nc e d and C orrupt O r g an iz a tio n s c o n s p ir a c y , in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 8 4 6 , § 1 9 6 2 ( d ) ; c o n s p ir a c yto



# FI LED JAN 19 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50586 2 pos s e s s w i th i nt e ntt o di s tr i but e and di s tr i but e m e tha m phe t a m i ne , i n vi ol a t i on 21 U . S . C . §§ 84 6, 84 1(a) (1); and p osse ss i on w i th i nt entt o d i stribu t e acontrol l ed s ubs t anc e , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . § 841( a ) ( 1) . P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), G on za l ez R om er o’ s c ou nselhas f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e n o g r o u n d s f

o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w ith d r aw a s c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d . W e have prov i ded the appel l antw i th the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent al br i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f orans w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. G onz a l e z R om e r o w a i ve d hi s r i ghtt o appe a l hi s s e nt e nc e w i th the e xc e pt i on of cond i t i on s of c ert ai n sup ervi se d rel ea se . O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the re cord pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U .S . 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o ar g u ab le grou nd s f

or re l i ef as t o d ef endant ’ s c on vi ct i on or the cond i t i on s of s up ervi se d r e l e a s e , and i ndi c a t e s tha tthe appe a l w a i ve ri s va l i d. W e di s m i s s the appe a l of the s e n te n c e in p art. See U ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 23 5 F . 3d 11 79 , 11 82 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) .C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N T E D . A F F IR M E D i n p art an d D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF 10-K/A REPORT**

**OF**

**CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009**

 

# 1.     Theundersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (“CrownMedia Holdings”).  This Certification ismade pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the 10-K/AReport of Crown Media Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2009.

#  

# 2.     Icertify to my knowledge that such 10-K/A Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K/A Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Crown Media Holdings.

#  

ThisCertification is executed as of April 30, 2010.

 

 
|   | /s/  Brian C. Stewart                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian  C. Stewart, Executive Vice President |
|   | and Chief Financial Officer                 |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert HAUCK, Appellant.

No. WD 47849.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 15, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 1994.

James R. Hobbs, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Albert Hauck appeals his conviction of arson in the second degree. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Yvette Roussel, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (John T. Hecht, J.), rendered June 2, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California </i>(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>; <i>People v Murray</i>, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; <i>Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011];<i> People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>ALIOTTA, J.P., PESCE and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: August 09, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Case 2:17-cr-01437-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01437-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01437-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01437-DGC Document 1 Filed 09/04/17 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LLC.








Date: November 12, 2010





/s/Mark Gatto


Mark Gatto


Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON Capital Corp.


Manager of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
Exhibit 12.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Tom Ehret, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stolt Offshore S.A.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                                                
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 31, 2005 |  | /s/    TOM EHRET                                               
|                   |  | Tom Ehret Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
#### Geoffrey Lynn SIMPKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert HARDESTY, Terry Bulter, John Shively, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 56500.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 21, 1989.

Geoffrey Lynn Simpkins, Farmington, pro se.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Hardesty.

Terry Bulter, Farmington, pro se.

John Shively, Farmington, pro se.

ORDER

Plaintiff, an inmate, filed a small claims petition seeking a $107.00 judgment against defendants for property which he claims was taken from his cell while he was in temporary detention. The small claims court dismissed the petition for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiff appealed to the circuit court, and after a trial de novo at which defendants did not appear, the court entered judgment for defendants. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Order entered July 9, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00469-CV

RONNA HODGES, Appellant

V.

JOHN CURTIS HODGES, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC1700152

ORDER

As ordered to do so, appellant has filed written verification she has paid the fees for the 

clerk's and reporter's records. Accordingly, we ORDER Jennifer Lindenzweig, Hunt County 

Clerk, and Shannon N. Sudderth, Official Court Reporter of Hunt County Court at Law No. 2, to 

file the clerk's and reporter's record, respectively, no later than August 8, 2018.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Lindenzweig, 

Ms. Sudderth, and the parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
1Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, this Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 29, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 03-10602

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

versus

ANTHONY RAY ALLEN,

Defendant/Appellee.

_____________________

No. 03-10611

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

versus

BILLY GENE MOORE,

Defendant/Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division

District Court Cause No. 3:02-CR-301

_________________________________________________________________

Before JONES, WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges.1

PER CURIAM.

The court has considered the appellant's argument in light
of oral argument, the briefs and pertinent portions of the

record. Having done so, we find no reversible error and affirm

for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 2 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 3 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 4 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 5 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 6 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 7 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 8 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 9 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 10 of 11
Case 4:17-cv-00526-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 11 of 11
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19057-19058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10586]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19058]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Intent To File an Application for a New License

April 24, 1996.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to File An Application for a 
New License.
    b. Project No.: 2566.
    c. Date filed: March 27, 1996.
    d. Submitted By: Consumers Power Company, current licensee.
    e. Name of Project: Webber.
    f. Location: On the Grand River, in Lyons and Portland Townships, 
Ionia County, Michigan.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 16.6 of the Commission's Regulations.
    h. Effective date of original license: April 1, 1962.
    i. Expiration date of original license: March 30, 2001.
    j. The project consists of: (1) a 32-foot-high, 1200-foot-long dam 
consisting of an earthfill embankment with concrete core wall section, 
a reinforced concrete gated spillway section, and intake sections; (2) 
a 7.0-mile-long reservoir having a 660 acre surface area at normal pool 
elevation 684.4 feet USGS; (3) a powerhouse containing two generating 
units with a total installed capacity of 3,250-Kw; (4) circuit breakers 
and transformer banks; and (5) appurtenant facilities.
    k. Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.7, information on the project is available 
at: Consumers Power Company, 330 Chestnut Street, Cadillac, MI 49601, 
Attn: Judy A. Schneider (616) 779-5516.
    l. FERC contact: Charles T. Raabe (202) 219-2811.
    m. Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.8, 16.9, and 16.10, each application for a 
new license and any competing license applications must be filed with 
the Commission at least 24 months prior to the expiration of the 
existing license. All applications for license for this project must be 
filed by March 30, 1999.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10586 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Assignment of patents of Professor Dr. Wolfgang Barnikol to Sangui Biotech, AG &
GlukoMeditech,  AG

Date:  29  October  1996  (sic  -  actual  date  was  7  July  1997)

This  agreement  is  made  and  executed between Professor Wolfgang Barnikol and
Sangui  Biotech,  AG  (Sangui)  and GlukoMediTech, AG (GlukoMediTech), companies
organized  under  the  laws  of  Germany.

1.     RATIFIED,  that  all  patents  issued  to Professor Dr. Wolfgang Barnikol
relating to oxygen carrier, oxygen sensor and glucose sensor will be assigned to
either  Sangui  or  GlukoMediTech.

2.     RATIFIED,  that all patent applications, when granted from the applicable
patent  office or any other agencies, shall be assigned also to either Sangui or
GlukoMediTech.

3.     RATIFIED,  that  all  patents  granted to Barnikol in the future, will be
automatically  assigned  to  either  Sangui  or  GlukoMediTech.

4.     RATIFIED,  that  Sangui  Biotech,  AG  and  GlukoMediTech,  AG will grant
Barnikol  royalty  on  future  product  sales  as  the  sole  considerations for
Barnikol's  patents.

3%  royalty  on  products  on  net  revenues  be  paid  to Professional Wolfgang
Barnikol,  MD,  Ph.D on products developed by SanguiBiotech AG or GlukoMediTech,
AG.  The  royalty  shall  expire  in 20 years or upon expiration of the relevant
patent(s)  on  which  the  products  are  based  on,  whichever  comes  first.

The  royalty  shall  be  made in the above-described manner, when applicable, to
Professor  Wolfgang  Barnikol  or  to  his  estate or his heirs as it may apply.

Accepted


/s/  Axel  J.  Kutscher                    /s/  M.  Barnikol
-----------------------                    ------------------------------
SanguiBiotech  AG                          Professor Dr. Wolfgang Barnikol
GlukoMediTech  AG
Axel  J.  Kutscher
Director
N otice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 24 -BG- 0353

IN RE JOSHUA N. DEBOLD
, DDN: 2 024 -D 032 A Me mber of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

B ar Registration No. 989159

BEFORE: Beckwith and Easterly, Associate Judges, and Washington, Senior Judge

.
O R D E R (FILED — June 20, 2024)

O n consideration of the certified order from the Commonwealth of Virginia revoking respondent’s license to practice law ; this court’s May 3, 2024 , order suspending respondent pending final disposition of this proceeding and directing h im to show cause why disbarment should not be imposed as reciprocal discipline ; and the state ment of Disciplinary Counsel ; and it appearing that respondent has not filed a response or his D.C. Bar R. XI § 14(g) affidavit
, it is

OR DERED that Joshua N. Debold is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia

. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483, 487

- 88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption should be rare) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (stating that the rebuttable presumption of ident ical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate); see also In re Laibstain , 841 A.2d 1259, 1263 (D.C. 2004) (explaining that the equivalent sanction for revocation in the District is disbarment). It isNo. 24 -BG- 0354

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

PE R CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24300-24301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11984]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-97-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

May 8, 1996.
    Take notice that a technical conference will be convened in the 
above-docketed proceeding on

[[Page 24301]]

Wednesday, May 22, 1996, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated at 
the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20426. Any party, as defined in 18 CFR 
385.102(c), any person seeking intervenor status pursuant to 18 CFR 
385.214, and any participant, as defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is 
invited to participate.
    For additional information, please contact Carolyn Van Der Jagt, 
202-208-2246, or Tom Gooding, 202-208-1123, at the Commission.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11984 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 2:17-mj-00591-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00591-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00591-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00591-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00591-MHB Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 5 of 5