alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jack L. VAUGHN, D.V.M., Appellant, v. MISSOURI VETERINARY MEDICAL BOARD,1 Respondent.

No. WD 46418.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 26, 1993.

Earl F. Seitz, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jane A. Rackers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and FENNER and HANNA, JJ.

1

. The appellant named the Administrative Hearing Commission as a party respondent in this appeal. The administrative hearing agency is not a contending party on appeal. We have deleted the Administrative Hearing Commission as a named respondent. *See Geriatric Nursing Facility, Inc. v. Department of Social Services,*693 S.W.2d 206, 209 (Mo.App.1985).

*724ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the respondent’s revocation of appellant’s license to practice veterinarian medicine.

Judgment Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Lori GRIGGS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 67994.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Oct. 31, 1995.

Cornelius T. Lane; Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Theodore G. Pashos, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff seeks to recover underinsured motorist benefits from defendant as a result of her daughter’s death. Defendant filed a summary judgment motion, which the trial court granted. Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.

Plaintiffs daughter was killed in a one-vehicle accident. Driver’s insurance company paid plaintiff its policy limit of $50,000.

Plaintiff has two policies with defendant. Each provides underinsured motorist coverage of $50,000 per person and $100,000 each accident. The policies contain these pertinent provisions:

> Underinsured motor vehicle means a motor vehicle which is insured by a liability bond or policy at the time of the accident which provides bodily injury liability limits less than the limits of liability of this un-derinsured motorist coverage.

> The limits of liability of this coverage will be reduced by:

> 1. A payment made or amount payable by or on behalf of any person or organization which may be legally liable, or under any collectible auto liability insurance, for loss caused by an accident with an under-insured motor vehicle.

An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b). No error of law appears. *See Rodriguez v. General Acc. Ins. Co., 808*S.W.2d 379 (Mo. banc 1991); *Kendall v. American Fire & Cas. Co.,*873 S.W.2d 301 (Mo.App.E.D.1994).

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6629

MICHAEL BUSHEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00080-RBS)

Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: October 31, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Bushee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Bushee appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Bushee v.

Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 2:07-cv-00080-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 2,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00079-CR

Andrew MIERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016cr7970

The Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 4, 2018

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of possession 

of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (heroin, between 4 and 200 grams) and was 

sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment and assessed a $1,500.00 fine. The trial court imposed 

sentence in the underlying cause on July 12, 2017.

Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was 

due to be filed on August 11, 2017. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to 

file the notice of appeal was due on August 26, 2017. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant did not file 
04-18-00079-CR

- 2 -

his notice of appeal until November 9, 2017, and appellant did not file a motion for extension of 

time.

On February 28, 2018, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant responded on March 15, 2018 and 

acknowledged the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to 

entertain the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding 

that if appeal is not timely perfected, court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address merits 

of appeal, and court may take no action other than to dismiss appeal; court may not suspend rules 

to alter time for perfecting appeal); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); 

see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that 

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs 

out-of-time appeals from felony convictions). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 307 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 307

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         April 1, 2009.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1256) to protect the public health by 
providing the Food and Drug Administration with certain authority to regulate 
tobacco products. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment 
printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; (2) 
the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part B of the report on 
the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative Buyer of Indiana, or his 
designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as 
read, and shall be separately debatable for thirty minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. (a) In the engrossment of H.R. 1256, the Clerk shall--
            (1) add the text of H.R. 1804, as passed by the House, as new matter 
        at the end of H.R. 1256;
            (2) conform the title of H.R. 1256 to reflect the addition to the 
        engrossment of H.R. 1804;
            (3) assign appropriate designations to provisions within the 
        engrossment; and
            (4) conform provisions for short titles within the engrossment.
    (b) Upon the addition of the text of H.R. 1804 to the engrossment of H.R. 
1256, H.R. 1804 shall be laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Order entered January 2 9 , 2021

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00041

- CR

EX PARTE DEMOND JONES

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Te xas

Trial Court Cause No. 380

- 83350

- 2020

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 20, 2021 motion to extend the time

to file his notice of appeal. We GRANT appellant’ s motion. Appellant’s notice of

appeal is deemed timely filed on the date it was re ceived

. This is a n ac c e le ra t e d

a pp e a l and is g ov e rn e d b y T e x a s R ule of App e l l a te P r o c e dure 3 1.

W e ORDER the tri a l c ourt to pr e p a r e a c e rtifi ca t ion of a pp e l l a nt’s r i g ht to

a pp ea l a nd t o file it with the clerk’s record.

W e ORDER the Col l in Coun t y Distri c t Cl e r k to file the c le r k’s r e c o rd

b y February 15, 2021

. Appellant has filed a brief indicating that the trial courtadjudicated appellant’s writ application on written arguments without conducting a

hearing. Thus, we will not order the filing of a reporter’s record.

W e ORDER t

he State to file its bri e f b y March 8, 2021

. A ft e r t h e

clerk’s r ec o rd a nd the State’s b ri e f h a ve b ee n fil e d, t h e Court will not i f y the

p a rti e s of the submis s ion date a nd p a n e l.

W e DI R ECT the Cl e rk to s e nd c opies of th i s ord e r to the Hono ra b l e

Benjamin N. Smith

, P r e sid i ng J ud g e

, 380th J udici a l Distri c t Court; Lynne Finley

,

Collin C ou n t y Distri c t C le r k; and c ouns e l for a l l pa r t i e s.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00109

- CV

Hari Prasad KALAKONDA and Latha Kalakonda,

Appellants

v.

ASPRI INVESTMENTS, LLC

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI01910

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. The cause

is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions for the t rial court to grant Shubha, LLC a

reasonable time to obtain counsel and make any necessary amendments to the motion to compel

arbitration . It is ORDERED that costs of the appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred

them.

SIGNED July 13, 2016.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
EXHIBIT J 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 135-12 Filed 05/15/19 Page 1 of 4
- - -os 1)b!-Y. ~ __ l _ nitals~ 

Prepr,-ed By --i- J _ AP!) oved By ~------'--__, 

, ..> WILSON !ONES G7 tl/ C:>REEN 

23 

-\'4 ,, ~

,2G 

27 

WB00000011 

I 

,, 

' j 

i 

• I 

l 

j 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 135-12 Filed 05/15/19 Page 2 of 4
5/15/2019, 

3:36 PM 

WILENCHIK & BARTNESS, PC 

AIR Transaction Listing 

Clie.Selection 

AIR.Classification 

Include: BRIDGES/CWT 

Open 

'B' for Billed. 'P' for Posted. 

ID Type 

Date Invoice# 

Client 

Check Number 

39710 PAY B BRIDGES/CWT 

7/31/2017 G:140509 

Payment - thank you 

Selection Criteria 

Redacted 

39998 PAY B BRIDGES/CWT 

8/31/2017 G:140679 

p t th k 

Redacted 

40276 PAY B BRIDGES/CWT 

9/30/2017 G:140862 

Payment - thank you 

Page 1 

(10000.00) 

(290.31) 

(17676.93) 

WB00000012 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 135-12 Filed 05/15/19 Page 3 of 4
5/15/2019~ 

3:36 PM 

ID Type Client 

WILENCHIK & BARTNESS, PC 

AIR Transaction Listing 

40499 PAY B BRIDGES/CWT 

10/31/2017 1:55062 

Payment - thank you 

Grand Total 

Redacted 

Payment 

Page 2 

(4573.09) 

(32540.33) 

WB00000013 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 135-12 Filed 05/15/19 Page 4 of 4
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 329 

Recognizing the anniversary of the tragic accident of the steamboat ship 

SS Sultana. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. SNYDER (for himself, Mr. WAMP, Mr. BERRY, Mr. ROSS, Mr. BOOZMAN, 

and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the anniversary of the tragic accident of the 

steamboat ship SS Sultana. 

Whereas the explosion of the SS Sultana on April 27, 1865, 

is considered the worst maritime disaster in American 

history; 

Whereas the steamboat ship SS Sultana exploded on the Mississippi River 7 miles north of Memphis, Tennessee, at 

2:00 a.m.; 

Whereas roughly 1,800 of the 2,400 passengers lost their 

lives in the tragedy; 

Whereas 2,000 passengers on the SS Sultana at the time of 

the explosion were Union prisoners of war recently released from the Confederate Andersonville and Cahaba 

Prison Camps in Alabama; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 329 IH 

Whereas several of the former prisoners of war were suffering 

from disease and extreme malnutrition caused by the 

overcrowded and unsanitary conditions at the prison 

camps; 

Whereas the explosion was presumed to have been caused by 

a defective boiler trying to overcome the current of the 

Mississippi River; 

Whereas the enormous loss of life was attributed to an overloaded vessel caused in part by poor oversight on behalf 

of the Union commanding officers responsible for the release of the prisoners of war; 

Whereas up to 300 of the initial survivors of the explosion 

later died from burns, hypothermia, or exposure; 

Whereas then Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton stated in 

his annual report for 1865 that the loss of ‘‘over 1200 

officers and greatly increased . . . by an improper and 

unnecessary overloading of the boat’’; 

Whereas only one of the several individuals responsible for 

the conditions of the steamer or the overloading of the 

vessel which contributed to the tragedy and large loss of 

life was ever prosecuted; and 

Whereas the disaster was not in the newspapers or magazines 

of the time and is scarcely remembered today: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 144-year anniversary of the 

3 tragic accident of the steamboat ship SS Sultana; 

4 (2) honors the memory of the soldiers and pas5 sengers who lost their lives in this disaster; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 329 IH 

1 (3) regrets the lack of military and civilian 

2 oversight that led to the explosion and tremendous 

3 loss of life; and 

4 (4) rededicates itself to honoring all our vet5 erans and military families with the highest level of 

6 support in quality resources, equipment and services. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Cary VanDerMeulen, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Defendants. 

NO. CV-17-03828-PHX-JAT (DMF) 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

 Decision by Court. This action came for consideration before the Court. The 

issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. 

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court’s order filed 

October 12, 2018, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed 

with prejudice for failure to state a claim. This dismissal may count as a “strike” under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

 

 Brian D. Karth 

 District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

October 12, 2018 

 s/ Ginelle Puraty

 By Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James M. Spiezio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



/s/ JAMES M. SPIEZIO James M. Spiezio Chief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2011


---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve his argument that the court erred in refusing to suppress the victim’s in-court identification because the People failed to "present information” that the victim had viewed defendant after the robbery but before the photo array, and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Nor was defendant denied his right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30. The People announced readiness at arraignment and there is no proof that they were not actually ready for trial at that time *(cf., People v Kendzia,*64 NY2d 331, 337-338). We cannot review the court’s CPL article 440 order because defendant failed to obtain leave to appeal. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21444-21445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11770]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 21445]]


COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Proposed Additions to the Procurement List; Correction

    In the document appearing on page 18571, F.R. Doc. 96-10409, in the 
issue of April 26, 1996, in the first column, under the Trousers, Wet 
Weather, it should read (Remaining 50% of the Government's requirement) 
rather than (Remaining 25% of the Government's requirement).
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 96-11770 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICER

REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| I, Dean E. Sukowatey, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of ALL Fuels & Energy Company(the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying report on Form10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: April 15, 2008. | /s/ DEAN E. SUKOWATEY |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------|--------|

|   | Dean E. Sukowatey

Acting Chief Accounting Officer |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
EXHIBIT 32.8

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey L.
Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 10, 2007



By:

/s/ TRACEY L. STOCKWELLTracey L. StockwellTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5927 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw certain documents 

relating to grizzly bears. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2023 

Mr. NEWHOUSE introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw certain 

documents relating to grizzly bears. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RE4 LATING TO GRIZZLY BEARS. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior— 

6 (1) shall withdraw the proposed rule of the 

7 United States Fish and Wildlife Service titled ‘‘En8 dangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Es9 tablishment of a Nonessential Experimental PopuVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:43 Nov 02, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5927.IH H5927

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5927 IH

1 lation of Grizzly Bear in the North Cascades Eco2 system, Washington State’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 67193; 

3 published September 29, 2023); and 

4 (2) shall withdraw and terminate the prepara5 tion of the draft Environmental Impact Statement of 

6 the National Park Service and the United States 

7 Fish and Wildlife Service titled ‘‘Draft Grizzly Bear 

8 Restoration Plan / Environmental Impact State9 ment’’ (published September 2023). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT A 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 151-1 Filed 05/28/19 Page 1 of 1