alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5931 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5931

   To require a briefing from a senior official of the Department of 
  Defense on actions by the People's Republic of China in Africa that 
           pose a threat to United States national security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2023

                 Mr. Rose introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

              Referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require a briefing from a senior official of the Department of 
  Defense on actions by the People's Republic of China in Africa that 
           pose a threat to United States national security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Countering Chinese Threats to U.S. 
National Security in Africa Act''.

SEC. 2. BRIEFING ON ACTIONS BY THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA IN AFRICA 
              THAT POSE A THREAT TO UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Deputy Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for African Affairs or another appropriate senior 
official of the Department of Defense, shall brief members of Congress 
on the actions by the People's Republic of China in Africa that pose a 
threat to United States national security and the plan of the 
Department to counter such threats.
                                 <all>
```
LARRY HENDERSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4421

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed June 24, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry Lewis , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorn ey General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL

, ROWE

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

__________________

FORM 20-F/A

__________________

[  ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002.



[  ] TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSACTION PERIOD FROM _____ TO _______



Commission File Number 0-13933



Western Silver Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



A Corporation Formed Under The Laws Of British Columbia

(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)



Suite 1550, 1185 West Georgia Street

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4E6

(Address of principal executive offices)



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act



|N/A                 | N/A                                      
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:



Common Shares

(Title of Class)



Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report (as of March 31, 2003).  33,462,965



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[ X ] Yes  [   ] No



Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.



Item 17  [X] Item 18  [ ]





Index:



Ex 1

Audited Annual Financial Statements for Fiscal Year September 20, 2002



Ex. 99.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification



Ex. 99.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification





SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and had duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Dated: June 19, 2003

Western Silver Corporation





By: Robert J. Gayton



Robert J. Gayton

Vice President, Finance
Case 2:17-mj-00480-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00480-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00480-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00480-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21183-21184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11560]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation      Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire 
or control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.25 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.25) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for processing, it will 
also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the 
question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 
of the BHC Act, including whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a hearing 
on this question must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a 
written presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, 
identifying specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, 
summarizing the evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and 
indicating how the party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of 
the proposal.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than May 23, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Christopher J. McCurdy, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045:
    1. The Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; to engage de 
novo through its subsidiary, Scotia Capital Markets (USA) Inc., New 
York, New York, in certain foreign exchange advisory and transaction 
services and in futures commission merchant activities,

[[Page 21184]]

pursuant to Secs.  225.25 (b)(17) and (18) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 3, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-11560 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5640 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 12804 Chillicothe Road in Chesterland, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Sgt. Wolfgang Kyle Weninger Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5640 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SGT. WOLFGANG KYLE WENINGER POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 12804 Chillicothe Road in 

5 Chesterland, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sgt. Wolfgang Kyle Weninger Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sgt. Wolfgang Kyle 

11 Weninger Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Donald L. Marsh, Jr. the President and Chief Operating Officer of Castle Brands Inc. (the ‘‘Registrant’’) and Alfred J. Small Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies that:

1. The Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, (the ‘‘Periodic Report’’), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: February 14, 2008

/s/ Donald L. Marsh, Jr.


/s/ Alfred J. SmallDonald L. Marsh, Jr.


Alfred J. SmallPresident and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---
Change Order 1



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FORM E-2 
 CHANGE ORDER FORM 
  

			
	 PROJECT NAME: Sabine Pass LNG Phase 2 Receiving, Storage and Regasification Terminal Expansion
  
 COMPANY: Sabine Pass LNG, L.P.
  
 CONTRACTOR: Bechtel Corporation
  
 DATE OF AGREEMENT: July 21, 2006
	  	 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: SP2/BE-001
  
 DATE OF CHANGE ORDER: October 24, 2006


 The Agreement between the Parties listed above is changed as follows: (attach additional documentation
if necessary)  
 The second sentence of Attachment F, Section 1B is replaced with the following:

 “Bechtel shall procure the full limits under the builder’s risk policy under Section 1A.9, including $100 million of the
limits specified under Section 1A.9 for property loss or damage from flood and windstorm, no later than ninety (90) days after Notice to Proceed, and the remaining $300 million limit for property loss or damage from flood and windstorm no
later than May 15, 2007.” 
 There is no increase in the Fixed Fee associated with the implementation of the following Change Order Requests

 Adjustment to Bechtel’s Fixed Fee 
  

				
	 The original Fixed Fee was
	  	$	18,500,000
	 Change in Fixed Fee by previously authorized Change Orders
	  	$	0.00
	 The Fixed Fee prior to this Change Order was
	  	$	18,500,000
	 The Fixed Fee will change by this Change Order in the amount of
	  	$	0.00
	 The new Fixed Fee including this Change Order will be
	  	$	18,500,000

 This Change Order shall constitute a full and final settlement and accord and satisfaction of all effects
of the change as described in this Change Order upon the Fixed Fee and shall be deemed to compensate Bechtel fully for such change. 
 Upon execution of this
Change Order by Company and Bechtel, the above-referenced change shall become a valid and binding part of the original Agreement without exception or qualification, unless noted in this Change Order. Except as modified by this and any previously
issued Change Orders, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Change Order is executed by each of the Parties’ duly authorized representatives. 
  

					
	 Sabine Pass LNG, L.P.
	 		 	 /s/ J. Montalvo

	 Company
	 		 	 Bechtel

			
	 /s/ Ed Lehotsky
	 		 	 Jose Montalvo

	 Name
	 		 	 Name

			
	 Project Director
	 		 	 Project Mgr.

	 Title
	 		 	 Title

			
	 October 24, 2006
	 		 	 24 Oct. 06

	 Date of Signing
	 		 	 Date of Signing


  

 E-1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6629
MICHAEL BUSHEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00080-RBS) Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: October 31, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Bushee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Bushee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bushee v. Commonwealth of Virginia , No. 2:07-cv-00080-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 24, 2011

d0516 

# Order

May 24, 2011

142680

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142680 COA: 293248 Wayne CC: 08-014156-FC JONATHAN AL CAPONE GARRETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Order entered December 17, 2012

In The

: iitb gtxa at

No. 05-12-00964-CR

CHARLES RAY BACON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-31310-S

ORDER

This appeal is REINSTATED.

The trial court has filed findings of fact in accordance with our order entered on

November 20, 2012. Appellant’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11805]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy


Notice of Closed Meeting of Board of Visitors to the United 
States Naval Academy

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given that the Board of Visitors to 
the United States Naval Academy will meet on May 13, 1996, at Alumni 
Hall, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD, at 8:30 a.m. The 
meetings will be closed to the public.
     The purpose of the meeting is to make such inquiry as the Board 
shall deem necessary into the state of morale and discipline, the 
curriculum, instruction, physical requirements, fiscal affairs, and 
academic methods of the Naval Academy. During the meeting these 
inquiries will relate to the internal personnel rules and practices of 
the Academy, may involve review of on-going criminal investigations, 
and include discussions of personal information the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy if 
the meeting was open to the public. Accordingly, the Secretary of the 
Navy has determined in writing that this meeting shall be closed to the 
public because the meeting will be concerned with matters as outlined 
in sections 552b(c) (2), (5), (6), (7), and (9) of Title 5, United 
States Code.
    For further information concerning this meeting contact: Lieutenant 
Commander Adam S. Levitt, U.S. Navy, Secretary to the Board of 
Visitors, Office of the Superintendent, United States Naval Academy, 
Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, Telephone Number: (410) 293-1503.

    Dated: May 1, 1996.
M.A. Waters,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11805 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
**Exhibit32**

 

**ATLANTIC SOUTHERNFINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**For theNine Months Ended September 30, 2007**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

This31st day of October, 2007

 

 
| /s/  Mark Stevens        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/  Carol Soto          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
|                          |        |  |

 

1

----
EX-10.2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT TO THE HUBBELL INCORPORATED

STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR KEY EMPLOYEES

Amended, Effective June 9, 2004




     WHEREAS, this Corporation maintains the Hubbell Incorporated Stock Option Plan for Key
Employees (the “Plan”), which has been amended and restated from time to time, the most recent
amendment taking place effective June 9, 2004;



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has reserved the right in Section 7 of the Plan to amend the
Plan;



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors of
this Corporation have determined that it is in the best interest of the Corporation to amend the
Plan to comply with recently issued accounting guidance by providing for automatic adjustments with
respect to Class B Common Stock of the Corporation which is subject to options under the Plan
following certain corporate events affecting the Class B Common Stock or its share price.



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective immediately upon passage hereof, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows:



     By substituting the following for the first paragraph of Paragraph (d):




“If (i) the Company shall at any time be involved in a transaction to
which Section 424(a) of the Code is applicable; (ii) the Company shall
declare a dividend payable in any class of shares, or shall subdivide or
combine, its shares; or (iii) any other event shall occur which
necessitates action by way of adjusting the terms of the outstanding
options, in order to prevent dilution or enhancement of outstanding
options, the Committee shall forthwith take such action to preserve the
participant’s rights substantially proportionate to the rights existing
prior to such event and to the extent that such action shall include an
increase or decrease in the number of shares subject to outstanding
options, the number of shares available under Paragraph 3 above shall be
increased or decreased, as the case may be, proportionately. The
actions of the Committee shall, with respect to any matter referred to
in this Paragraph, be conclusive and binding upon each participant.”



     I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Stock Option Plan for Key Employees was
adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation on September 13, 2006 at a duly held meeting
thereof.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Richard W. Davies
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Richard W. Davies
	 

	 	 	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Dated: September 21, 2006
	 	 	 	 







32
T.C. Memo. 2000-21

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

RICHARD T. MULLEN, Petitioner v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 15922-98. Filed January 19, 2000.

Howard A. Weinberger, for petitioner.

Ann S. O’Blenes, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FOLEY, Judge: By notice dated June 29, 1998, respondent

determined deficiencies in, and penalties relating to,

petitioner’s 1993, 1994, and 1995 Federal income taxes. After

concessions, the sole issue for decision is whether discharge of
- 2 -

indebtedness income that is excluded, pursuant to section 108,

from the gross income of an S corporation increases the basis of

petitioner's S corporation stock. The parties submitted this

case fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122. All section

references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the

years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court

Rules of Practice and Procedure. 

At the time the petition was filed, Richard T. Mullen

resided in Dallas, Texas. During 1993, petitioner was a

shareholder in ICP Properties, Inc. (ICP), an S corporation. 

That year, ICP realized, but excluded pursuant to section 108(a),

$1,444,677 of discharge of indebtedness income. 

On January 1, 1993, petitioner’s stock basis in ICP was

zero. Petitioner increased his stock basis by the amount of his

pro rata share of ICP's discharge of indebtedness income and, on

his 1993 tax return, deducted passive losses.

Respondent contends, pursuant to Nelson v. Commissioner, 110

T.C. 114 (1998), affd. 182 F.3d 1152 (10th Cir. 1999), that the

$1,444,677 of discharge of indebtedness income does not result in

a basis increase in the ICP stock. In Nelson, we held that an S

corporation's shareholder may not increase his basis to reflect

the S corporation's excluded discharge of indebtedness income. 

See id. Petitioner does not attempt to distinguish Nelson, but

instead contends that Nelson was decided incorrectly. This case
- 3 -

is indistinguishable from Nelson, and we need not reiterate our

analysis. Accordingly, we hold that the discharge of

indebtedness income does not increase petitioner's stock basis. 

To reflect the foregoing,

Decision will be entered

under Rule 155.