alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ICICI Bank Limited. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                          |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Chanda KochharManaging Director & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   | N. S. Kannan                                                  |   |
|   | Executive Director & Chief Financial Officer              |   |

----
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

CDW 1996 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN




          WHEREAS, CDW Corporation, an Illinois corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and
maintains the CDW 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”); and




          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.




          NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 12 of the Plan, the
Plan is hereby amended effective as of October 19, 2006 as follows:




          1. Section 6 of the Plan shall be amended by replacing the phrase “may all be appropriately
adjusted, as the Board or the Committee may determine” with the phrase “shall be equitably adjusted
by the Board or the Committee” as it appears in the first sentence thereof.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly
authorized officer this 25th day of October 2006.





CDW CORPORATION




By:  /s/ Robert J. Welyki




Name: Robert J. Welyki




Title: VP, Treasurer & Asst. Secretary
#### James Brooks NEWBILL, Appellant, v. Melanie NEWBILL, Respondent.

No. 66725.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

June 20, 1995.

Rehearing Denied July 24, 1995.

Janet F. Catalona, Clayton, for appellant.

William E. McCurdy, Jr., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Brooks Newbill, appeals from the trial court’s order modifying the parties’ decree of dissolution and awarding respondent attorneys’ fees. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Respondent’s motion to supplement the record on appeal, motion regarding mootness and motion to strike portions of appellant’s reply brief are denied. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BMX Development Corp. for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean A. Stewart, Chief
Financial Officer, of the Company, certify that:
 
 *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Dean A.
Stewart
 Dean A.
Stewart
 Chief
Financial Officer, Controller
 
 August
16, 2010
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, James G. Azlein, certify that:1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPI Energy Holdings,Inc. (the “registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:March 19, 2007                                 /s/ James G. Azlein   By: James G. Azlein,   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

193 Doris Trust, Andrew Hudson, and Erin 

Hudson, Appellants

No. 06-23-00080-CV v.

Aaron Hansen, Juanita Hansen, William B. 

Patterson, IV, Ben Purcell, Candace Poole, 

John Carson, Liz Carson, Terry Hainlen, 

Thomas L. Terrell, and Pamela A. Terrell, 

Appellees

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Kerr County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 20684C). 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and 

Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Stevens. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s Summary Judgment Order in part, 

dissolve the language prohibiting the Appellants from using or advertising the Property for 

special events or other non-residential uses, and remand the case for the trial court to reconsider 

that paragraph and to redraft it in accordance with Tarr and JBrice Holdings. In all other 

respects, we affirm the Reinstatement Order. 

We further order that the appellants and appellees shall each pay one-half of all costs 

incurred by reason of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 25, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thrifty
PrintingInc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harvey Lalach, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
Dated: August 9, 2006

/S/ Harvey Lalach
Harvey Lalach
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1, 2017

a1025 

# Order

Clerk November 1, 2017

154128

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154128

COA: 311625

Wayne CC: 99

- 005393

- FC

JUSTLY ERNEST JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRA NTED. T he parties shall

address: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion by declining to grant a new trial

on grounds of newly discovered evidence, in light of the testimony of Charmous Skinner,

Jr., at the post

- conviction evidentiary hearing; (2) whether, even if the defendant’s

previous claims of new evidence are barred under MCR 6.508(D)(2), the evidence on

which those claims were based must still be considered in determining if the new

evidence from Charmous Skinner, Jr., makes a different r esult probable on retrial, see

People v Cress , 468 Mich 678, 692 (2003); and (3) whether trial counsel rendered

constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to interview Charmous Skinner, Jr., or

call him as a witness at trial.

We further ORDER th at this case be argued and submitted to the Court together

with the case of People v Scott (Docket No. 154130), at such future session of the Court

as both cases are ready for submission. The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20

minutes for each sid e. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

M C C ORMACK

, J., not participating because of her prior involvement in this case as

counsel for a party.

W ILDER , J., not participating because he was on the Court of Appeals panel that

decided the defendant’s motion for peremptory reversal.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00343

- CV

Rick REILEY and Gary K. Weddle,

Appellants

v.

Pleas D. “Beau” ANDERSON , II and Margaret Anderson,

Appellees

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 0074

- CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this joint motion to dismiss appeals is

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. The dismissal of this appeal does not alter or affect

the finality of the trial court’s judgment. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellants.

SIGNED August 14, 2013.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40943 Conference Calendar

WILBERT C. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:97-CV-81

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Wilbert C. Johnson, Texas inmate #613845, appeals from the judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous. We have carefully reviewed the record and the appellate arguments. The essence of Johnson’s complaint arises from the revocation of probation, the issuance of parole, and the revocation of that parole. Judgment in Johnson’s favor necessarily would call into question the validity of those proceedings, and Johnson has notNo. 97-40943 -2- demonstrated that the rulings from those proceedings have been otherwise overturned. Therefore, his cause of action has yet to arise. See Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); Jackson v. Vannoy , 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous. See McCormick v. Stalder , 105 F.3d 1059, 1061 (5th Cir. 1997).
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection  with the filing by Assure Data,  Inc. (the "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  June 30,  2006 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company.



                                       Date:  August 15, 2006

                                        /s/  Robert Lisle
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Lisle, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0043 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CORY ANN RUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until August 11, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2022

07/14/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0043
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10884]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Meeting

    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Review of the research protocol for the study: 
``Evaluation of Prevention Strategies to Reduce Back Pain and Injury 
Among Nursing Home Workers.''
    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-5 p.m., June 5, 1996.
    Place: Suncrest Facility, Large Conference Room, NIOSH, CDC, 
3040 University Avenue, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505-2888.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 60 people.
    Purpose: The purpose of this meeting is to obtain comments and 
input regarding the technical and scientific merits of the study, 
``Evaluation of Prevention Strategies to Reduce Back Pain and Injury 
Among Nursing Home Workers,'' being conducted by NIOSH. The purpose 
of the proposed research is to evaluate lifting equipment and 
medical management programs for their effectiveness in reducing the 
incidence, cost, and subsequent disability associated with work-
related injuries and reports of pain. Participants will review the 
proposed study protocol, provide recommendations for scientific 
changes, and provide advice to NIOSH on the conduct of the study. 
Viewpoints and suggestions from industry, labor, academia, other 
government agencies and the public are invited. Written comments 
will be part of the review, and should be received by the contact 
person listed below no later than May 21, 1996.
    Contact Person for Additional Information: James W. Collins, 
NIOSH, CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, M/S 1133, Morgantown, West 
Virginia 26505-2888, telephone 304/285-5998.

    Dated: April 25, 1996.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 96-10884 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-19-M
The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United S tates District Judge for the District 1 of South Dakota, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3892

___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Steven W. Arnold, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 11, 1996 Filed: June 13, 1997

___________ Before BEAM and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE , District Judge. 1

___________ BEAM, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the district court's reduction of Steven Arnold' s sentence for drug con spiracy pursuant to a Sentencing Commission amendment to the Career Offender Guideline, United States S entencing Commission, Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1 comment. (n.2). In light of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. LaBonte , No. 95-1726, 1997 WL 273644 (U.S. May 27, 1997), we reverse an d remand for resentencing.-2-

Stev en Arnold was sentenced to 360 months (30 years) of incarceration fo r various d rug crimes. Because he qualified as a career offender, his sentence wa s enhanced in accordance with a statute that directs the Sentencing Com mission to assure that certain repeat o ffenders are sentenced "at or near the maximum term authorized." 28 U.S.C. § 994(h). At the time of his original sentencing, that maximum t erm, referred to as the "Offen se Statutory Maximum" in the Career Offender Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, had been interpret ed to mean the maximum of the enhanced sentencing range, not the unenhanced range. See , e.g. , United States v. Sanchez , 988 F.2d 138 4, 1394-97 (5th Cir. 1993).

The Sentencing Commission later amended the Career Offender Guideline t o define "Offense Statutory Maximum" as the statutory maximum exclusive of an y enhancement based on a prior crimin al record. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, comment. (n.2) (1995). Arnold then filed a motion to reduce his sentence. Over objection by th e government, the district court applied the amendment and reduced Arnold's sentence to 262 months (21 years, 10months). This appeal followed. Although we had earlier ruled tha t the Sentencing Commission had exceeded its authority in enacting th e amendment, United States v. Fo untain , 83 F.3d 946, 953 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 1996 WL 547024 (U.S. June 2, 1997) (No. 96-6001), we reserved ruling on this case while the issue was considered by the United States Supreme Court in another case.
The Supreme Court has now rejected t he Sentencing Commission's approach as at odds wit h the plain language of 18 U.S.C. § 994(h). United States v. LaBonte , 1997 WL 273644 at *4 Because the stat ute, and not the amended Guideline, controls, the "m aximum term authorized" must be read to include all applicable statutor y sentenci ng enhancements. Id. at *7. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to th e district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.-3-

A true copy.
ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1238]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical 
and Communications Systems (1196).
    Date and Time: February 15, 1996; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 680, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Chanan Singh, Program Director, Power 
Systems, Division of Electrical and Communications Systems, Room 
675, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1340.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Power Systems Career proposals as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 22, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-1238 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





We, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Michael Stunden, Chief Financial Officer of Project Romania Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended May 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ John Karlsson

John Karlsson
Chief Executive Officer

July 14, 2006



/s/ R. Michael Stunden

R. Michael Stunden

Chief Financial Officer

July 14, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.