24706 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

submittal pertained to a plan for the

implementation of the federal

transportation conformity requirements

at the State or local level in accordance

with 40 CFR part 51, subpart T—

Conformity to State or Federal

Implementation Plans of Transportation

Plans, Programs, and Projects

Developed, Funded or Approved Under

Title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit

Act. This conditional approval is based,

in part, on the State’s commitment,

submitted in a letter on April 1, 1996,

to submit revised transportation

conformity rules to incorporate the two

amendments to the federal

transportation conformity regulations.

The State of Ohio committed to revise

its transportation conformity rules by

November 14, 1996. If the State

ultimately fails to meet its commitment

to meet these requirements within one

year of final conditional approval, then

USEPA’s action for the State’s requested

SIP revision will automatically convert

to a final disapproval.

(i) Incorporation by reference. August

1, 1995, Ohio Administrative Code

Chapter 3745–101, effective August 21,

1995.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 96–12357 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[PA 078–4019a; FRL–5467–6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans;

Pennsylvania; Approval of SourceSpecific VOC and NOX RACT and

Synthetic Minor Permit Conditions,

and 1990 Baseyear Emissions for one

Source

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision

submitted by the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania. This revision establishes

and requires reasonably available

control technology (RACT) on eleven

major sources, establishes permit

conditions to limit three sources’

emissions to below major source levels,

and establishes 1990 baseyear VOC and

NOX emissions for one source. This

action affects a total of 14 sources. The

intended effect of this action is to

approve source-specific plan approvals,

operating permits, and compliance

permit and emission inventory figures

for emission units at one source, which

establish the above-mentioned

requirements in accordance with the

Clean Air Act. This action is being taken

under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This action is effective July 1,

1996, unless notice is received on or

before June 17, 1996, that adverse or

critical comments will be submitted. If

the effective date is delayed, timely

notice will be published in the Federal

Register.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

Marcia L. Spink, Associate Director, Air

Programs, Mailcode 3AT00, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 841 Chestnut Building,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

Copies of the documents relevant to this

action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the Air, Radiation, and Toxics

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut

Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

19107; the Air and Radiation Docket

and Information Center, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460;

Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air

Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400

Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia H. Stahl, (215) 597–9337, at the

EPA Region III office or via e-mail at

stahl.cynthia@epamail.epa.gov. While

information may be requested via

e-mail, comments must be submitted in

writing to the above Region III address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

January 6, 1995, July 5, 1995 (as

amended on November 22, 1995),

August 1, 1995, and September 20,

1995, the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania submitted formal

revisions to its State Implementation

Plan (SIP). The SIP revisions that are the

subject of this rulemaking consist of

plan approvals, operating permits and a

compliance permit for ten individual

sources of volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) and/or nitrogen oxides (NOX)

located in Pennsylvania. This

rulemaking addresses the compliance

permit and those plan approvals and

operating permits pertaining to the

following sources: (1) U.G.I. Utilities,

Inc. (Luzerne Co.)—utility, (2) Solar

Turbines (York Co.)—cogeneration

facility, (3) Columbia Gas

Transmission—Renovo Compressor

Station (Clinton Co.)—natural gas

compressor station, (4) National Fuel

Gas Supply Corporation—East Fork

Compressor Station (Potter Co.)—

natural gas compressor station, (5) York

Resource Energy Systems, Inc. (York

Co.)—municipal waste combustion

facility, (6) W.R. Grace & Co.—Formpac

Division (Berks Co.)—expandable

polystyrene blowing facility, (7) CNG

Transmission—Cherry Tree Station

(Indiana Co.)—natural gas transmission

station, (8) EPC Power Corporation of

Bethlehem—Crozer Chester

Cogeneration plant (Delaware Co.)—

cogeneration plant, (9) C–P Converters,

Inc. (York Co.)—flexographic printing

operation, (10) Fisher Scientific Co.

International—Instrument

Manufacturing Division (Indiana Co.). In

addition, the permits containing

provisions limiting source emissions to

synthetic minor source levels (below

RACT threshold level of 100 tons per

year of potential NOX emissions) are

being approved for five sources: a)

Adelphi Kitchens, Inc.—Robesonia

factory (Berks Co.)—wood furniture

coating operation, b) Birchcraft

Kitchens, Inc. (Berks Co.)—wood

furniture coating operation, and c)

Glasgow, Inc.—Bridgeport asphalt plant

(Montgomery Co.)—asphalt plant. In

addition, on July 5, 1995 (as amended

on November 22, 1995) and March 18,

1996, Pennsylvania submitted a RACT

determination and 1990 baseyear

emission inventory figures for General

Glass—Jeannette Plant (Westmoreland

Co.) for EPA approval into the

Pennsylvania SIP. Therefore, this

rulemaking will also address the

approval of the RACT determination for

the emission units at General Glass—

Jeannette plant and the establishment of

1990 baseyear emissions for these

emission units. The other plan

approvals and operating permits

submitted together with these being

approved today will be addressed in

another rulemaking notice.

Pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and

182(f) of the Clean Air Act (CAA),

Pennsylvania is required to implement

RACT for all major VOC and NOX

sources by no later than May 31, 1995.

The major source size is determined by

its location, the classification of that

area and whether it is located in the

ozone transport region (OTR), which is

established by the CAA. The

Pennsylvania portion of the

Philadelphia ozone nonattainment area

consists of Bucks, Chester, Delaware,

Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties

and is classified as severe. The

remaining counties in Pennsylvania are

classified as either moderate or marginal

nonattainment areas or are designated

attainment for ozone. However, under

section 184 of the CAA, at a minimum,

moderate ozone nonattainment area

requirements (including RACT as

specified in sections 182(b)(2) and

182(f)) apply throughout the OTR.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 24707

Therefore, RACT is applicable statewide

in Pennsylvania.

The January 6, 1995, July 5, 1995 (as

amended on November 22, 1995),

August 1, 1995, and September 20, 1995

Pennsylvania submittals that are the

subject of this notice, are meant to

satisfy the RACT requirements for 11

sources in Pennsylvania and to limit the

potential VOC emissions at three

sources to below the major source size

threshold in order to avoid the RACT

requirement.

Summary of SIP Revision

The details of the RACT requirements

for the source-specific plan approvals

and operating permits can be found in

the docket and accompanying technical

support document and will not be

reiterated in this document. Briefly,

EPA is approving eight plan approvals,

six operating permits and one

compliance permit as RACT and three

operating permits as revisions to the

Pennsylvania SIP to limit three sources’

emissions to below the major source

threshold. Several of the plan approvals

and operating permits contain

conditions irrelevant to the

determination of VOC or NOX RACT.

Consequently, these provisions are not

being included in this approval for VOC

or NOX RACT. In addition, a correction

to the Pittsburgh area 1990 baseyear

emissions inventory for one source is

being made through this rulemaking

document.

RACT

EPA is approving the plan approval

(PA 40–0005A) and operating permit

(OP 40–0005) for U.G.I. Utilities, Inc.,

located in Luzerne County. U.G.I.

Utilities, Inc. is a utility and is

considered a major source of NOX

emissions. EPA is approving the plan

approval (PA 67–2009) and compliance

permit (CP 67–2009) for Solar Turbines.

Inc., located in York County. Solar

Turbines, Inc. is a cogeneration plant

and is considered a major source of NOX

emissions. Included in Solar Turbines—

RACT determination is a compliance

date extension until December 31, 1997

for the installation of dual fuel dry low

NOX combustors on six natural gas

turbines. EPA is approving the plan

approval (PA 18–0001) and operating

permit (OP 18–0001) for Columbia Gas

Transmission Corporation—Renovo

Compressor Station, located in Clinton

County. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation—Renovo Compressor

Station is a natural gas compressor

station and is considered a major source

of NOX emissions. EPA is approving the

plan approval (PA 53–0007A) and

operating permit (OP 53–0007) for

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation—

East Fork Compressor Station, located in

Potter County. National Fuel Gas

Supply Corporation—East Fork

Compressor Station is a natural gas

compressor station and is considered a

major source of NOX emissions. EPA is

approving the plan approval (PA 67–

2006) for York Resource Enery Systems,

Inc., located in York County. York

Resource Enery Systems, Inc. is a

municipal waste combustion facility

and is considered a major source of NOX

emissions. EPA is approving the plan

approvals (PA 06–1036 and PA 06–315–

001) for W.R. Grace & Co.—Formpac

Division, located in Berks County. W.R.

Grace & Co.—Formpac Division is an

expandable polystyrene foam product

manufacturer and is considered a major

source of VOC emissions. EPA is

approving the plan approval (PA 32–

000–303) for CNG Transmission

Corporation—Cherry Tree Station,

located in Indiana County. CNG

Transmission Corporation—Cherry Tree

Station is a natural gas compressor

station and is considered a major source

of NOX emissions. EPA is approving the

operating permit (OP 23–0007) for EPC

Power Corporation of Bethlehem—

Crozer-Chester Cogeneration plant,

located in Delaware County. EPC Power

Corporation of Bethlehem—CrozerChester Cogeneration plant is a

cogeneration plant and is considered a

major source of NOX emissions. EPA is

approving the operating permit (OP 67–

2030) for C–P Converters, Inc., located

in York County. C–P Converters, Inc. is

a flexographic printing operation and is

considered a major source of VOC

emissions. EPA is approving the

operating permit (OP 32–000–100) for

Fisher Scientific Co. International—

Instrument Manufacturing Division,

located in Indiana County. Fisher

Scientific Co. International—Instrument

Manufacturing Division is a coater of

laboratory instruments and is

considered a major source of VOC

emissions.

The specific emission limitations and

other RACT requirements for these

sources are summarized in the

accompanying technical support

document, which is available from the

EPA Region III office.

Several of the plan approvals/

operating permits contain a provision

that allows for future changes to the

emission limitations based on CEM or

other monitoring data. Since EPA

cannot approve emission limitations

that are not currently before it, any

changes to the emission limitations as

submitted on January 6, 1995, July 5,

1995, August 1, 1995, and September

20, 1995 to EPA must be resubmitted to

and approved by EPA in order for these

changes to be incorporated into the

Pennsylvania SIP. Consequently, the

source-specific RACT emission

limitations that are being approved into

the Pennsylvania SIP are those that were

submitted on the above-mentioned dates

and are the subject of this rulemaking

document. These emission limitations

will remain part of the SIP unless and

until a revised limitation is approved by

EPA pursuant to 40 CFR part 51 and

approved by the U.S. EPA. In addition,

several of the plan approvals and

operating permits contain a general

provision that would allow compliance

date extensions at the request of the

source and approval by Pennsylvania

without EPA approval. While EPA does

not automatically rule out the

possibility of compliance date

extensions, EPA cannot pre-approve

compliance date extensions that have

not been submitted to it for review

through such general provision.

In addition, EPA is establishing RACT

for the glass furnace (No. 2) and kilns

(#1 through 4) at the now shutdown

General Glass—Jeannette plant. These

sources represent the only NOX emitting

sources at the plant at the time of its

shutdown on July 8, 1993. All of these

sources ceased operation and had their

permits revoked on July 8, 1993. RACT

for these sources is determined to be no

additional controls. The total postRACT NOX emissions (based on a three

year average of operating conditions) for

these sources is 518 tons per year. The

1990 baseyear VOC and NOX emissions

for the above-named sources are also

being approved. The NOX 1990

emissions from the glass melting

furnace are 508.2 TPY. The NOX 1990

emissions from the four kilns are 11.8

TPY. EPA is also using this document

to recognize the 518 tons of NOX per

year emission reduction credits created

by the shutdown of this plant.

Synthetic Minor Permits

EPA is approving the operating permit

(OP 06–1001) for Adelphi Kitchens,

Inc.—Robesonia factory, located in

Berks County. Adelphi Kitchens, Inc.—

Robesonia factory is a wood furniture

manufacturing facility and had potential

VOC emissions greater than 50 TPY.

EPA is approving the operating permit

(OP 06–1005) for Birchcraft Kitchens,

Inc.—Reading factory, located in Berks

County. Birchcraft Kitchens, Inc.—

Reading factory is a wood furniture

manufacturing facility and had potential

VOC emissions greater than 50 TPY.

The approval of the conditions in each

of these facilities’ respective permits

will limit the emissions at those

facilities to less than 50 TPY and would
24708 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

allow them to avoid being considered

major VOC sources, subject to the major

source RACT requirements of the Clean

Air Act and the Pennsylvania

regulation. EPA is also approving the

operating permit (OP 46–0044) for

Glasgow, Inc.—Bridgeport Asphalt

Plant, located in Montgomery County.

Glasgow, Inc.—Bridgeport Asphalt Plant

is an asphalt plant and had potential

VOC and NOX emissions greater than 25

TPY. Montgomery County is part of the

Philadelphia severe ozone

nonattainment area, to which the more

stringent 25 TPY major source threshold

applies.

The technical support document

contains the details of each of the RACT

determinations, synthetic minor permit

conditions, and 1990 baseyear

emissions calculations. It is available at

the EPA Region III office listed in the

Addresses section of this document.

EPA is approving this SIP revision

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

amendment and anticipates no adverse

comments. However, in a separate

document in this Federal Register

publication, EPA is proposing to

approve the SIP revision should adverse

or critical comments be filed. This

action will be effective July 1, 1996,

unless, by June 17, 1996, adverse or

critical comments are received.

If EPA receives such comments, this

action will be withdrawn before the

effective date by publishing a

subsequent document that will

withdraw the final action. All public

comments received will then be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this action serving as a

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a

second comment period on this action.

Any parties interested in commenting

on this action should do so at this time.

If no such comments are received, the

public is advised that this action will be

effective on July 1, 1996. If adverse

comments are received that do not

pertain to all documents subject to this

rulemaking action, those documents not

affected by the adverse comments will

be finalized in the manner described

here. Only those documents that receive

adverse comments will be withdrawn in

the manner described here.

Final Action

EPA is approving eight plan

approvals, six operating permits, and

one compliance permit as RACT for ten

individual sources, three operating

permits to limit emissions at three

facilities to below major source levels,

and the RACT determination and the

1990 baseyear emissions for the glass

melting furnace and four kilns at

General Glass—Jeannette plant.

Nothing in this action should be

construed as permitting or allowing or

establishing a precedent for any future

request for revision to any state

implementation plan. Each request for

revision to the state implementation

plan shall be considered separately in

light of specific technical, economic,

and environmental factors and in

relation to relevant statutory and

regulatory requirements.

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,

5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA must prepare

a regulatory flexibility analysis

assessing the impact of any proposed or

final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603

and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify

that the rule will not have a significant

impact on a substantial number of small

entities. Small entities include small

businesses, small not-for-profit

enterprises, and government entities

with jurisdiction over populations of

less than 50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and

subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act

do not create any new requirements but

simply approve requirements that the

State is already imposing. Therefore,

because the Federal SIP approval does

not impose any new requirements, the

Administrator certifies that it does not

have a significant impact on any small

entities affected. Moreover, due to the

nature of the Federal-State relationship

under the CAA, preparation of a

flexibility analysis would constitute

Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The

Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its

actions concerning SIPs on such

grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA,

427 U.S. 246, 255–66 (1976); 42 U.S.C.

7410(a)(2).

Under Section 202 of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed

into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must

prepare a budgetary impact statement to

accompany any proposed or final rule

that includes a Federal mandate that

may result in estimated costs to State,

local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate; or to the private sector, of

$100 million or more. Under section

205, EPA must select the most costeffective and least burdensome

alternative that achieves the objectives

of the rule and is consistent with

statutory requirements. Section 203

requires EPA to establish a plan for

informing and advising any small

governments that may be significantly

or uniquely impacted by the rule.

This Federal action approves preexisting requirements under State or

local law, and imposes no new Federal

requirements. Accordingly, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal

governments, or to the private sector,

result from this action.

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action, pertaining to the approval of

eleven source-specific VOC and NOX

RACT determinations, three synthetic

minor permits, and correction to the

1990 baseyear emissions inventory in

Pennsylvania, must be filed in the

United States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by July 15, 1996.

Filing a petition for reconsideration by

the Administrator of this final rule does

not affect the finality of this rule for the

purposes of judicial review nor does it

extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and

shall not postpone the effectiveness of

such rule or action. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference,

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: April 19, 1996.

W.T. Wisniewski,

Acing Regional Administrator, Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Subpart NN—Pennsylvania

2. Section 52.2020 is amended by

adding paragraph (c)(108) to read as

follows:

§ 52.2020 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(108) Revisions to the Pennsylvania

Regulations, Chapter 129.91 pertaining

to VOC and NOX RACT, submitted on

January 6, 1995, July 5, 1995, July 31,

1995, August 1, 1995, September 20,

1995, November 22, 1995, and March

18, 1996 by the Pennsylvania

Department of Environmental Resources

(now known as the Pennsylvania

Department of Environmental

Protection):

(i) Incorporation by reference.

(A) Seven letters, dated January 6,

1995, July 5, 1995, July 31, 1995, August

1, 1995, September 20, 1995, November

22, 1995, and March 18, 1996 from the
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 24709

Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Resources (now known

as the Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection) transmitting

source specific VOC and/or NOX RACT

determinations in the form of plan

approvals or operating permits for the

following sources: U.G.I. Utilities, Inc.

(Luzerne Co.)—utility, Solar Turbines

(York Co.)—cogeneration facility,

Columbia Gas Transmission—Renovo

Compressor Station (Clinton Co.)—

natural gas compressor station, National

Fuel Gas Supply Corporation—East Fork

Compressor Station (Potter Co.)—

natural gas compressor station, York

Resource Energy Systems, Inc. (York

Co.)—municipal waste combustion

facility, W.R. Grace & Co.—Formpac

Division (Berks Co.)—expandable

polystyrene blowing facility, CNG

Transmission—Cherry Tree Station

(Indiana Co.)—natural gas transmission

station, EPC Power Corporation of

Bethlehem (Delaware Co.)—Crozer

Chester Cogeneration Plant, C-P

Converters, Inc. (York Co.)—

flexographic printing operation, Fisher

Scientific Co. International—Instrument

Manufacturing Division (Indiana Co.). In

addition, the permits containing

provisions limiting source emissions to

synthetic minor sources levels (below

RACT threshold level of 100 tons per

year or 25 TPY of potential NOX

emissions and 50 TPY or 25 TPY for

potential VOC emissions) are being

approved for three sources: Adelphi

Kitchens, Inc.—Robesonia factory (Berks

Co.)—wood furniture coating operation,

Birchcraft Kitchens, Inc.—Reading

factory (Berks Co.)—wood furniture

coating operation, and Glasgow, Inc.—

Bridgeport Asphalt Plant (Montgomery

Co.)—asphalt plant.

(B) Plan approvals (PA), Operating

permits (OP), Compliance permit (CP):

(1) U.G.I. Utilities, Inc.—OP 40–0005,

effective December 20, 1994 and PA 40–

0005A, effective December 20, 1994,

except the expiration date of the plan

approval and conditions # 18, 19, and

20 pertaining to non-VOC or NOX

emissions and ash and waste oil

requirements.

(2) Solar Turbines—PA 67–2009,

effective August 17, 1995, except the

expiration date of the plan approval and

CP 67–2009, effective August 17, 1995,

except the expiration date of the

compliance permit.

(3) Columbia Gas Transmission—

Renovo Compressor Station—OP 18–

0001, effective July 18, 1995, except the

expiration date of the operating permit

and condition #8, pertaining to

compliance date extensions and PA 18–

0001, effective July 18, 1995, except the

expiration date of the plan approval and

condition #14, pertaining to compliance

date extensions.

(4) National Fuel Gas Supply

Corporation—East Fork Compressor

Station—OP 53–0007, effective July 17,

1995, except the expiration date of the

operating permit, including the

corrections to condition #6 and 13 (from

a letter dated July 31, 1995) and PA 53–

0007A, effective July 17, 1995, except

the expiration date of the plan approval.

(5) York Resource Energy Systems,

Inc.—PA 67–2006, effective August 25,

1995, except the expiration date of the

plan approval and the non-VOC or nonNOX elements in conditions #4, 8, 9, 10

12, 18, and 19.

(6) W.R. Grace & Co.—Formpac

Division—PA 06–1036, effective May

12, 1995, except the expiration date of

the plan approval and condition #10 (d)

and (e) pertaining to compliance date

extensions and PA 06–315–001,

effective June 4, 1992, except the

expiration date of the plan approval.

(7) CNG Transmission Corporation—

Cherry Tree Station—PA 32–000–303,

effective July 5, 1995, except the

expiration date of the plan approval, the

elements in condition #6 pertaining to

carbon monoxide, and condition #16 D.

and E. pertaining to compliance date

extensions.

(8) EPC Power Corporation of

Bethlehem—Crozer Chester

Cogeneration plant—OP 23–0007,

effective June 8, 1995, except the

expiration date of the operating permit.

(9) C–P Converters, Inc.—OP 67–2030,

effective August 30, 1995, except the

expiration date of the operating permit.

(10) Fisher Scientific—Instrument

Manufacturing Division—OP 32–000–

100, effective July 18, 1995, except the

expiration date of the operating permit.

(11) Adelphi Kitchens, Inc.—

Robesonia factory—OP 06–1001,

effective April 4, 1995, except the

expiration date of the operating permit.

(12) Birchcraft Kitchens, Inc.—

Reading factory—OP 06–1005, effective

April 4, 1995, except the expiration date

of the operating permit.

(13) Glasgow, Inc.—Bridgeport

Asphalt Plant—OP 46–0044, effective

June 7, 1995, except the expiration date

of the operating permit.

(ii) Additional material.

(A) Remainder of January 6, 1995, July

5, 1995, August 1, 1995, September 20,

1995, State submittals.

(B) Revision to the Pennsylvania SIP

dated March 18, 1996, submitted by the

Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection, pertaining to

the 1990 emission inventory for General

Glass—Jeannette, Westmoreland

County.

3. Section 52.2037 is amended by

adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:

§ 52.2037 Control Strategy: Carbon

monoxide and ozone (hydrocarbons).

* * * * *

(d) NOX RACT determination for the

no. 2 glass melting furnace and the four

kilns at the General Glass—Jeannette

plant, which manufactured flat glass, is

the current operation, consisting of no

additional controls.

4. Section 52.2036 is amended by

adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:

§ 52.2036 1990 Baseyear Emission

Inventory.

* * * * *

(c) The 1990 NOX emissions for the

no. 2 glass melting furnace at the

General Glass—Jeannette plant, located

in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania

is 508.2 tons per year. Westmoreland

County is part of the Pittsburgh

moderate ozone nonattainment area.

The 1990 NOX emissions for the four

kilns (no. 1 through 4) is 11.8 tons per

year. This facility does not contain any

other NOX emitting units.

[FR Doc. 96–12355 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[OR47–11–7052a; FRL–5504–8]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans: Oregon

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) approves Oregon’s

Transportation conformity rules

received on April 17, 1995, from the

Oregon Department of Environmental

Quality (ODEQ). The Clean Air Act

(CAA or Act) requires the states to

promulgate conformity rules to ensure

that Federal actions conform to the

appropriate State Implementation Plan

(SIP). Conformity to a SIP is defined in

the CAA, as amended in 1990, as

meaning conformity to a SIP’s purpose

of eliminating or reducing the severity

and number of violations of the national

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)

and achieving expeditious attainment of

such standards. The Federal agency

responsible for the action is required to

determine if its actions conform to the

applicable SIP.

DATES: This action is effective on July

15, 1996 unless adverse or critical

comments are received by June 17,

1996. If the effective date is delayed,