alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21166-21167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11573]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-59-000]


Arkansas Western Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 3, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 29, 1996, Arkansas Western Pipeline 
Company (AW Pipeline), pursuant to 18 CFR 154.111, tendered a new 
tariff sheet containing an index of firm customers (Original Sheet No. 
89) and First Revised Sheet No. 1 (Table of Contents).
    AW Pipeline states that a copy of this filing is served upon the 
Arkansas Public Service Commission and the Missouri Public Service 
Commission upon all intervenors in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public

[[Page 21167]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11573 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 7798** 

MICHAEL ANTHONY PROZER, III ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 9:14

- cv
- 01249

- TMC )

Submitted : April 28, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015

Before MOTZ and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Anthony Prozer, III, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Michael Anthony Prozer, III, appeals the district court ’ s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his complaint filed under the Federal Tort

Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) (1), 2671

- 2680 (2012). We have

reviewed the issues Prozer raises in his informal opening and
supplemental brief s and find no reversible error. A ccordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the d istrict court. *

Prozer v. United States , No. 9:14

- cv
- 012 49

- TMC (D.S.C. Nov. 25,

2014)

. We deny Prozer’s motion to stay his appeal and his

motion s for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argume nt would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Prozer argues that the district court assessed his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), citing one such reference on the judgment form. But the magistrate judge and the d istrict court properly analyzed Prozer’s claims under the Federal Tort Cla ims Act. T he error on the judgment form is plainly a clerical one
.
#### In the Interest of W.J.T., Plaintiff. Robert A. THARP, Appellant, v. Joanne McDONNELL, (formerly Tharp), Respondent.

No. WD 47582.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 25, 1994.

*560Sheldon Bernstein, Kansas City, for appellant.

Anthony Rex Gabbert, Liberty, for guardian ad litem.

Joseph Michael Svetlic, Gladstone, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fathers appeal from a court order of restricted visitation, appointment of the Division of Family Services as “responsible adult” to supervise pursuant to § 452.400.2 RSMo Supp.1991, and child support order.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11508]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-31, 736, 736A, 736B, 736C]

Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Workers 
Adjustment Assistance

    Bayer Clothing Group, Inc., Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Bayer 
Clothing Group, Inc., Hyde, Pennsylvania; Bayer Clothing Group, 
Inc., New Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Kent Sportswear, Inc., 
Curwensville, Pennsylvania.
    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 1, 1996, applicable to 
all workers of Bayer Clothing Group, Inc., located in Clearfield, 
Pennsylvania. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 
19, 1996 (61 FR 11224).

    At the request of the petitioner, UNITE, the Department reviewed 
the certification for workers of the subject firm. Union officials 
report that two of the subject firms' production facilities of the 
subject firm were excluded from the worker certification, the Hyde 
Plant and the New Philadelphia Plant. The workers produce men's 
sportcoats and suit coats. Also excluded was Kent Sportswear, Inc. 
located in Curwensville, Pennsylvania, a contractor engaged in sew, 
press and finish operations for the Bayer Clothing Group, Inc.

    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Bayer Clothing Group, Inc., who were adversely affected by 
increased imports of apparel. Accordingly, the Department is amending 
the certification to include workers of the subject firm locations in 
Hyde and New Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and workers of Kent Sportwear, 
Inc., located in Curwensville, Pennsylvania.

    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,736 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Bayer Clothing Group, Inc., located in 
Clearfield, Pennsylvania (TA-W-31,736); Hyde, Pennsylvania (TA-W-
31,736A); and New Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-31,736B); and 
workers of Kent Sportswear, Inc., Curwensville, Pennsylvania (TA-W-
31,736C) who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after December 11, 1994, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 29th day of April 1996.

Russell T. Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96-11508 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### Kevin J. JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 61925.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 9, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 13, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied May 25, 1993.

Dave Hemingway, Office of the Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Aundreia R. Alexander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 40 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 40

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 14, 2009.
    Resolved, That clause 2 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
    ``(n)(1) Each standing committee, or a subcommittee thereof, shall hold at 
least one hearing during each 120-day period following the establishment of the 
committee on the topic of waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement in Government 
programs which that committee may authorize.
    ``(2) A hearing described in subparagraph (1) shall include a focus on the 
most egregious instances of waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement as documented 
by any report the committee has received from a Federal Office of the Inspector 
General or the Comptroller General of the United States.
    ``(o) Each committee, or a subcommittee thereof, shall hold at least one 
hearing in any session in which the committee has received disclaimers of agency 
financial statements from auditors of any Federal agency that the committee may 
authorize to hear testimony on such disclaimers from representatives of any such 
agency.
    ``(p) Each standing committee, or a subcommittee thereof, shall hold at 
least one hearing on issues raised by reports issued by the Comptroller General 
of the United States indicating that Federal programs or operations that the 
committee may authorize are at high risk for waste, fraud, and mismanagement, 
known as the `high-risk list' or the `high-risk series'.''.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(d)(3) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
``That section shall also delineate any hearings held pursuant to clauses 2(n), 
(o), or (p) of this rule.''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

                                  Certification

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of TOP Group Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004
(the "Form 10-KSB/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 11, 2005                             /s/ Song Ru-hua
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Song-Ru-hua
                                                Principal Executive Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as a separate
disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNIS DWAYNE JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-15)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 29, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Dwayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying his

motion for an extension of time to file a motion under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, No.

CR-94-15 (S.D.W. Va. May 5 & 26, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of  Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge, that:



1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2018 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |                                                           
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                           
|Dated:  July 24, 2018 | /s/Merle Ferguson
Merle Ferguson
Chief  Executive  Officer
#### Craig L. HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51018.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 16, 1996.

Jarrett Aiken Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 26

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 4 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 5 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 6 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 7 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 8 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 9 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 10 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 11 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 12 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 13 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 14 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 15 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 16 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 17 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 18 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 19 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 20 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 21 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 22 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 23 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 24 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 25 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 26 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 27 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 28 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 29 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 30 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 31 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 32 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 33 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 34 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 35 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 36 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 37 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 38 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 39 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 40 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 41 of 42
Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 89-28 Filed 10/09/18 Page 42 of 42
H. Res. 377 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 14, 2009. 

Whereas Armed Forces Day was created in 1949 in connection with the consolidation of the military services in the 

Department of Defense; 

Whereas the purpose of Armed Forces Day is to honor the 

men and women who are serving in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard, including the 

National Guard and Reserve components; 

Whereas Armed Forces Day is celebrated on the third Saturday in May, which this year is May 16, 2009; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces have performed tremendous service on behalf of the United States; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces have been killed and 

injured in operations to bring peace and stability in the 

name of democracy; and 

Whereas all Americans express their recognition and gratitude for members of the Armed Forces at home and 

abroad: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives, on the occasion of Armed Forces Day 2009— 
2 

•HRES 377 EH 

(1) honors and recognizes the service and sacrifice 

that members of the Armed Forces and their families 

gave, and continue to give, to the United States; 

(2) remains committed to supporting the members 

of the Armed Forces and their families; 

(3) encourages Americans to show their support 

and appreciation for members of the Armed Forces on 

Armed Forces Day; 

(4) commends the actions of private citizens and organizations who volunteer to support America’s wounded 

warriors; and 

(5) expresses the gratitude of the American people 

to the members of the Armed Forces for their service on 

behalf of the United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION TO R ECONSIDER M OTION F OR R EHEARING EN B ANC

Cause number: 01

- 18

- 010 49

- CV

Style: Mosaic Baybrook One, L.P., Mosaic Baybrook Two, L.P., and

Mosaic Residential, Inc. v. Paul Simien

Type of motion: Motion to reconsider motion for rehearing en banc

Part y filing motion: Appell ant s

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to reconsider the motion f or rehearing en

banc is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Gordon Goodman

_____

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman,

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra, and Farris

.

Date: April 8, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12621]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EC96-19-000]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric 
Company and Southern California Edison Co.; Notice of Filing

May 14, 1996.
    Take notice that Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & 
Electric Company, and Southern California Edison Company (``the 
Companies''), on April 29, 1996, tendered for filing a Joint 
Application for Authorization To Convey Operational Control of 
Designated Jurisdictional Facilities to an Independent System Operator. 
This application requests authorization to transfer operational control 
(but not ownership) of certain transmission facilities to an 
Independent System Operator (``ISO''). The application describes the 
proposed governance and structure of the ISO, the manner in which the 
ISO will operate, and the transmission access and pricing rules that 
will apply to service over the ISO grid.
    In addition, the application sets forth recommended time frames for 
actions by the Companies, the Commission, and the participants in this 
proceeding. The Commission invites comments on these procedural 
proposals in addition to comments on the substantive proposal.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such application 
should file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211. All petitions or 
protests should be filed on or before June 13, 1996. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a petition 
to intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12621 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
H. R. 5867 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 109 Live 

Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, as the ‘‘Colonel Joseph William Kittinger 

II Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. COLONEL JOSEPH WILLIAM KITTINGER II POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Colonel Joseph William 

Kittinger II Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Colonel Joseph William Kittinger II Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.