alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10872]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-10-000]


NORSTAR Energy Limited Partnership; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 26, 1996.
    On October 2, 1995, NORSTAR Energy Limited Partnership (NORSTAR) 
filed an application for authorization to sell power at market-based 
rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, 
NORSTAR requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 
CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by NORSTAR. On April 25, 1996, the Commission issued an 
Order Accepting For Filing Open Access Transmission Tariffs And 
Conditionally Accepting For Filing Market-Based Rates (Order), in the 
above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's April 25, 1996 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (F), (G), and (I):
    (F) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by NORSTAR should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214 (1995).
    (G)Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (F) above, NORSTAR is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and to assume obligations or liabilities as guarantor, 
endorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, compatible with 
the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (I) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of 
NORSTAR's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. . . .
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 28, 1996.

    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10872 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.13
  Approval on Solutions Relating to Start-up Capital for Henan Jinding Chemical Co., Ltd.
 
 According to the reports from the management of Henan Jinding Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Jinding”), after the Spring Festival, with the peak season of consumption of fertilizer and downstream enterprises of methanol resuming production, the market conditions will further improved for the products of Jinding. Meanwhile, the purchase price of raw coal decreased as the temperature is rising and coal production has started. Equipment condition and the staffing are ready to start production at any time. The only problem is lack of start-up capital. According to this circumstance, I requested a subsidiary of our group to lend short-term loan of RMB 20M to Jinding for one year. The loan is expected to be
placed by the end of February, 2011 and no later than early March as start‐up capital.
 
 Xinyang Hongchang Group
 CEO:  Chen Siqiang
 February 19, 2011
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128217 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128217 

 COA: 258213 

Macomb CC: 04-000582-AR 

MARK STEVEN HOLZ, 42-1 DC: RO-30172 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 281 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 281

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 25, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1404) to authorize a supplemental funding source for catastrophic 
emergency wildland fire suppression activities on Department of the Interior and 
National Forest System lands, to require the Secretary of the Interior and the 
Secretary of Agriculture to develop a cohesive wildland fire management 
strategy, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural 
Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 
XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jonathan W. Trutter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                          |  |                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ JONATHAN W. TRUTTER                                                   |  | Date: November 14, 2005
|Jonathan W. Trutter
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting that signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. and will be retained by Deerfield Triarc Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12360]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

Training Programs in Bosnia; Amendment--Request for Proposals

    This is an amendment to the request for proposals (RFP) published 
on May 2, 1996, beginning on page 19655 and ending on page 19658, 
concerning media and parliamentary training programs for Bosnia 
(Announcement Number E/P-96-35). On page 19656, column 1, under 
Deadline for Proposals the sentence ``Faxed documents will not be 
accepted, nor will documents postmarked June 7, 1996, but received at a 
later date,'' is replaced by ``Faxed documents will not be accepted, 
nor will documents postmarked June 14, 1996, but received at a later 
date.''
    For further information, contact: Christina Miner, Office of 
Citizen Exchanges, European Division, Room 224, U.S. Information 
Agency, 301 4th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20547, telephone (202) 
619-5319, fax (202) 619-4350, Internet address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c5f515552594e7c494f555d125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0a3ada9aea5b280b5b3a9a1eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
John P. Loiello,
Associate Director for Educational and Cultural Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-12360 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5802 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow unreimbursed employee 

expenses to be taken into account as miscellaneous itemized deductions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California, Mr. 

SANTOS, and Mr. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow unreimbursed employee expenses to be taken into account 

as miscellaneous itemized deductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Business 

5 Expense Deduction Reinstatement Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5802 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNREIMBURSED EMPLOYEE EXPENSES TAKEN 

2 INTO ACCOUNT AS MISCELLANEOUS 

3 ITEMIZED DEDUCTION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 67(g) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘THROUGH 2025.—Notwith7 standing subsection (a)’’ and inserting the following; 

8 ‘‘THROUGH 2025.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection 

10 (a), and except to the extent provided in paragraph 

11 (2)’’, and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION FOR UNREIMBURSED FOOD, 

15 LODGING, TRAVEL, OR TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES

16 OF EMPLOYEES.—For such taxable years— 

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An individual may 

18 take into account under subsection (a) 85 per19 cent of any miscellaneous itemized deductions 

20 for the taxable year which are unreimbursed 

21 food, lodging, travel, or transportation expenses 

22 paid or incurred by the individual in connection 

23 with the performance of services as an em24 ployee. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5802 IH

1 ‘‘(B) MODIFIED FLOOR.—Subsection (a) 

2 shall be applied by substituting ‘1 percent’ for 

3 ‘2 percent’.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

6 11045 of Public Law 115–97 (commonly known as the 

7 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act). 

8 (c) EXTENSION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATION ON

9 CREDIT OR REFUND.—If the period of limitation on a 

10 credit or refund resulting from the amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) expires before the end of the 1-year period 

12 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, refund 

13 or credit of such overpayment (to the extent attributable 

14 to such amendments) may, nevertheless, be made or al15 lowed if claim therefor is filed before the close of such 

16 1-year period. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-KSB
      for the period from ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
      the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/
                Montse
                ZamanMontse Zaman
                CFO
                Dated:
                    April 18, 2008  This
        certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
Exhibit 31.1**Certification**I, William J. McGurk, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rockville Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     May 15, 2006 /s/ Mr. William J. McGurk         Mr. William J. McGurk    President and Chief Executive Officer  
35
EXHIBIT 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


LivePerson, Inc.


New York, New York


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-112019, 333-112018, 333-136249 and 333-147929) and Form S-8 (No. 333-34230, 333-147572, 333-159850, 333-168945 and 333-194590) of LivePerson, Inc. of our reports dated March 12, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of LivePerson, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in LivePerson, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.





/s/ BDO USA, LLPBDO USA, LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 12, 2015
EXHIBIT 10.1


Executive Officer
Compensation Arrangements (2006 Bonus)


On September 7,
2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of NeuroMetrix, Inc.
(the “Company”) determined the following compensation information for certain
executive officers of the Company regarding target cash bonuses for 2006. 
This compensation information is as follows:


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  2006 Target Bonus

  ($ and % of Base Salary)(1)

  	
   

  
	
  Shai N. Gozani, M.D.,
  Ph.D.

  	
   

  	
  Chairman,
  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  131,250 (50%)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Gary Gregory

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  123,375 (50%)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  W. Bradford Smith

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  69,300 (30%)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Guy Daniello

  	
   

  	
  Senior
  Vice President of Information Technology

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  47,545 (25%)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Michael Williams

  	
   

  	
  Senior Vice President
  of Engineering

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  49,612 (25%)

  	
   

  



 






(1)             The
award of cash bonuses in 2006 will be determined by the Compensation Committee
based on the executive officer’s and the Company’s achievement of a number of
objective and subjective goals specifically established for each executive
officer by the Compensation Committee.
NO. 07-06-0439-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JULY 20, 2007

______________________________

PARK TERRACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANT

v.

SARGON KHASHAN AND WIFE, VALENTINE KHASHAN, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 47 DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; TH

NO. 91,658-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Park Terrace Limited Partnership has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly,

the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will

issue forthwith. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. All costs incurred are adjudged against the party

incurring the same. 

James T. Campbell

Justice
#### Ex parte Anthony Devon HODGES.

No. 72351.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1996.

Anthony Devon Hodges, Pro Se.

Jeffery Herrington, District Attorney, Palestine, Robert A Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

*OPINION*

PER CURIAM.

This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Article 11.07, VAC.C.P. Applicant was indicted for possession of cocaine of less than one gram, a state jail felony offense pursuant to V.T.C.A. Health & Safety Code, § 481.115(b), alleged to have been committed on October 21, 1994 in Anderson County. On June 21, 1995, in a non-jury trial, applicant pled guilty to the charged offense, and true to the enhancement paragraphs. Punishment was assessed by the trial judge at twenty-five years imprisonment. No appeal was taken from this conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that the punishment assessed exceeds the statutory *240maximum. “We have long held that a defect which renders a sentence void may be raised at any time.” *Heath v. State,*817 S.W.2d 335, 336 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). *See also Ex parte McIver,*586 S.W.2d 851, 854 (Tex.Cr.App.1979) (Habeas corpus relief will issue to a person in custody under a sentence which is void because the punishment is unauthorized), *Ex parte Harris,*495 S.W.2d 231, 232 (Tex.Cr.App.1973) and *Ex parte White, 659*S.W.2d 434, 435 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). Applicant was convicted of a state jail felony, then enhanced as an habitual offender under V.T.CA. Penal Code § 12.42(d).

At the time that Applicant committed the offense, Texas law provided that a state jail felony could not be enhanced under § 12.42(d). State *v. Mancuso,*919 S.W.2d 86 (Tex.Cr.App.1996). Therefore, Applicant’s sentence of 25 years exceeds the statutory maximum and is unlawful.

Relief is granted. The judgment in cause number 23665 in the 3rd District Court of Anderson County is set aside and Applicant is remanded to the trial court for a new assessment of punishment.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional and Pardons and Paroles Divisions.