alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Richard Roland Draper, Jr., 

Defendant. 

No. CR-17-08278-01-PCT-DJH 

ORDER 

 The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a 

proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant 

violated the terms of his supervised probation as alleged in the petition. The Court further 

finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and 

convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised probation.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as flight risk and danger, 

pending further revocation proceedings. 

 Dated this 28th day of February, 2019.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 365 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 365

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 28, 2009.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of April 28, 2009, providing for consideration or disposition of 
a conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) 
setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for 
fiscal year 2010, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 
2009, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2011 
through 2014.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Schedule to Change in Control Agreements



 Exhibit 10.1(a) 
 Schedule to Change in Control Agreement 
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation (“HMEC”) and Horace Mann Service
Corporation (“HMSC”) entered into Change in Control Agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are identical to the one included as Exhibit 10.13 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and are the same type of agreement as the one included as Exhibit 10.7 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, except that (1) the multiple of the annual base salary and
average of annual cash bonus paid to the employee in the last three years and (2) the specified period during which such employee’s insurance benefits would continue are equal to the duration below. 
  

					
	 Employee
	  	Duration	  	Agreement Date
	 Frank D’Ambra
	  	1.5 years	  	03-08-2005
	 Michael A. Clark, Jr.
	  	1.0 years	  	09-12-2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sergiu A. Schipor,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Mesa Airlines Incorporated,

Defendant.

No. CV-17-04044-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

At issue is the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Proposed FLSA Collective 

Action Settlement (Doc. 33). To approve a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Settlement 

Agreement, the Court must determine that the compromise is a fair and reasonable 

resolution of a bona fide FLSA dispute. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 

1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Lopez v. Ariz. Public Serv. Co., No. CV 08-1843-

PHX-JAT, 2010 WL 1403873, at *1 (D. Ariz. Jan. 27, 2010). Furthermore, where a 

plaintiff or plaintiffs are represented by counsel, review of the reasonableness of attorneys’ 

fees serves to “assure both that counsel is compensated adequately and that no conflict of 

interest taints the amount the wronged employee recovers under a settlement agreement.” 

Silva v. Miller, 307 Fed. App’x 349, 351 (11th Cir. 2009).

The Settlement Agreement provides that Plaintiffs will receive $6,750.00 in wagerelated damages. (Doc. 33-1 at 11.) Plaintiffs’ counsel will receive $61,602.00 in fees and 

$9,652.80 in costs. (Doc. 33 at 3.) The Court finds that the compromise reached by the 

parties in the Settlement Agreement is a fair and reasonable resolution of this dispute. 

Case 2:17-cv-04044-JJT Document 34 Filed 12/20/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 33) is granted and the Settlement 

Agreement (Doc. 33-1) is approved. This case shall remain closed.

Dated this 20th day of December, 2019.

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge

Case 2:17-cv-04044-JJT Document 34 Filed 12/20/19 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.2 AMENDMENT/CHANGE CONTROL SEVERANCE AGRMT.



 






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO




CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Change of Control Severance Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered
into by and between Patrick M. Henn (“Executive”) and Indus International, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation (the “Company”), effective as of October 20, 2006.



RECITALS




     1. The Company and Executive have entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement with an
effective date of October 13, 2005, as previously amended (the “Agreement”);



     2. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders to offer the Executive this Amendment;



AMENDMENT




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued
employment of Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows:



     1. Amended and Restated Section 1. Section 1 is hereby amended and restated to read
as follows:




     1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be for a one year term; provided,
however, that upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, the term of the Agreement
automatically shall be extended to terminate on the second anniversary of the Change of
Control. In addition, the Compensation Committee may affirmatively extend the
term of the Agreement at any time. The Executive may, by notice to the Company given not
less than 60 days, but not more than 90 days, prior to the expiration of the then-current
term, cause the term of this Agreement not to be extended. In the event that the
Compensation Committee does not extend the term of the Agreement, or upon such notice of
non-renewal by the Executive, the term of this Agreement shall terminate upon the expiration
of the then-current term, including any prior extensions.



     2. Miscellaneous Provisions.



     (a) Definitions; Integration. Any capitalized term not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meaning given such term in the Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Agreement,
constitutes the entire understanding of the parties as regards to the subject matter hereof and
cannot be modified except by further written agreement of the parties.



     (b) Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the
Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Gregory J. Dukat	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and CEO	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	October 20, 2006	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Patrick M. Henn	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	EVP and CFO	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	October 20, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-9-2021]

On February 10, 2021, Enovix Corporation (Enovix) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 18, in Fremont, California.

The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the **Federal Register** inviting public comment (86 FR 10532, February 22, 2021). On June 10, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's conditional decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and further subject to a five-year time limit (ending June 10, 2026).

Dated: June 10, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-12559 Filed 6-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### BLEVCO ENERGY, INC. v. GETTY OIL COMPANY.

No. C-6223.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 24, 1989.

Petitioner’s motion to withdraw its motion for rehearing, filed on May 16, 1989, having been duly considered, it is ordered that the motion be granted.

Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is ordered withdrawn. The opinion and judgment of this Court, delivered December 7, 1988 are withdrawn and the *cause*is *dismissed.*
EXHIBIT M 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 135-15 Filed 05/15/19 Page 1 of 3
Account: 9245 Check#:1398 Amount:$100,000.00 Sequence:500107745 Deposited Account: 0900 

Date:04/18/2018 CaptureSequence:0 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 135-15 Filed 05/15/19 Page 2 of 3
Account: 9245 Check#:1641 Amount:$100,000.00 Sequence:500199755 Deposited Account: 0900 

Date:09/24/2018 CaptureSequence:0 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 135-15 Filed 05/15/19 Page 3 of 3
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT In the Interest of M.G., a child. ) ________________________________ ) ) T.G., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1934 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM, ) ) Appellees. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed April 6, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Amy R. Hawthorne, Judge. T.G., pro se. Meredith K. Hall of Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. David Paul Krupski, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 21392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11788]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Chapter 1

[Docket No. 96N-0094]


Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a 
proposed rule that appeared in the Federal Register of April 15, 1996 
(61 FR 16422). The document proposed to establish January 1, 1998, as 
its new uniform compliance date for all food labeling regulations that 
are issued after the publication of a final rule based on the proposal 
and before January 1, 1997. The document was published with an 
editorial error. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerad L. McCowin, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-150), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-4561.

    In FR Doc. 96-9319, appearing on page 16422 in the Federal Register 
of Monday, April 15, 1996, the following correction is made:
    1. On page 16422, in the first column, after the ``DATES'' caption, 
a new caption is added to read as follows: ``ADDRESSES: Submit written 
comments to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857.''

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 96-11788 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11587]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-60-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 30, 1996, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
become effective May 30, 1996:

First Revised Sheet No. 13
First Revised Sheet No. 14
First Revised Sheet No. 15
First Revised Sheet No. 16
First Revised Sheet No. 17
First Revised Sheet No. 18
First Revised Sheet No. 19
First Revised Sheet No. 20

    Texas Eastern states that the purpose of the filing is to update 
the system maps to reflect its current principal pipeline facilities 
and the points at which service is rendered, as required by Section 
154.106 of the Commission's Regulations.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on firm 
customers of Texas Eastern and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11587 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 13
- 00339
- CR EX PARTE TIMOTHY MIC HAEL BARNETT

From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013
- 2468
- 1

ORDER
Timothy Michael Barnett’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of Barnett’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed by this Court on March 13, 2014. Ex parte Barnett , No. 10

- 13

- 00339

- CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 2835 (Tex. App.

— Waco Mar. 13, 2014, no pet. h.) (publish). He has now filed a motion requesting this Court to immediately issue our mandate pursuant to Rule 18.1(c). T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 18.1(c). Barnett indicates in his motion that the State agrees to the e arly issuance of our mandate. Id

. Barnett’s motion is granted and the Clerk is ordered to issue the mandate in this appeal on the same date this order is issued.
PER CURIAMEx parte Barnett Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted Order issued and filed May 1, 2014
Orderissued October 

## I , 2012

In The 

## (!1n11r1 

## nf nah FiftI! Iitrict uf ixa 

## at aI1a No. 05-1O-00286-CV CARDIAC PERFUSION SERVICES, INC. AND MICHAEL JOUBRAN, Appel1ants/CrossAppeI1ees V. RANI)ALL hUGHES, Appellee/Cross-Appellant ORDER The Motion for Rehearing filedby appellant is hereby DENIED. ELWTH LANG-MIF
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 335 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 335

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 27, 2009.
Whereas National Volunteer Week will be observed during the week of April 19 
        through April 25, 2009;
Whereas National Volunteer Week honors the nationwide impact of volunteers in 
        every day American communities;
Whereas the theme of this year's National Volunteer Week is ``Celebrating People 
        in Action'', which recognizes individuals who dedicate themselves to 
        taking action and solving problems in their communities;
Whereas National Volunteer Week has been an annual celebration since 1974 and 
        every President since that time has signed a proclamation honoring 
        National Volunteer Week;
Whereas many State and local officials from around the country have actively 
        engaged their communities in celebrating National Volunteer Week;
Whereas data from the Corporation for National and Community Service shows that 
        61,803,000 volunteers dedicated 8,003,840,108 hours of service to 
        community organizations in 2008;
Whereas volunteers can play a critical role in helping struggling nonprofit 
        organizations with fundraising, directing services to individuals and 
        communities in need, and other skill-based assistance;
Whereas nonprofit organizations are reporting an increase in the number of 
        inquiries from both baby boomers and young people who are ready to serve 
        our Nation;
Whereas ``Celebrating People in Action'' is the recognition that every citizen 
        can make a difference in their community by taking action through 
        activities like building a ramp to ensure accessibility for people with 
        disabilities, tutoring a child struggling to read, serving food at a 
        homeless shelter, assisting the unemployed with job readiness skills, 
        and many other services; and
Whereas National Volunteer Week provides a moment in time to honor all those who 
        serve locally, nationally and internationally to change lives, 
        rejuvenate communities, and embody the best of the American spirit of 
        responsibility and civic engagement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Volunteer Week;
            (2) recognizes the critical role of our national and community 
        service programs;
            (3) honors the contributions of all those hard-working American 
        volunteers who make a difference in their communities every day of the 
        year; and
            (4) invites all Americans to answer the call to serve through 
        volunteerism in any form.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tarrell WHITFIELD, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 61849.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 81, 1995.

Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent and class X offender to a twenty year prison term. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
#### Anthony MILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64405.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 15, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 23, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied April 26, 1994.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties for their use only.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12248]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2385]


Advisory Committee on International Law; Notice of Meeting

    A meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Law will take 
place on Tuesday, June 11, 1996, from 2:00 to approximately 5:00 p.m., 
as necessary in Room 1406 of the U.S. Department of State, 2201 C 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will be chaired by the Legal 
Adviser of the Department of State, Conrad K. Harper, and will be open 
to the public up to the capacity of the meeting room. The meeting will 
focus on a review of current International Court of Justice litigation, 
International Court of Justice and International Law Commission 
elections during 1996, and other current developments.
    Entry to the building is controlled and will be facilitated by 
advance arrangements. Members of the public desiring access to the 
session should, by Friday, June 7, 1996 notify the Office of the 
Assistant Legal Adviser for United Nations Affairs (telephone (202) 
647-2767) of their name, Social Security number, date of birth, 
professional affiliation, address and telephone number in order to 
arrange admittance. The above includes government and non-government 
attendees. All attendees must use the ``C'' Street entrance. One of the 
following valid IDs will be required for admittance: Any U.S. driver's 
license with photo, a passport, or a U.S. Government agency ID.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
John R. Crook,
Assistant Legal Adviser for United Nations Affairs; Executive Director, 
Advisory Committee on International Law.
[FR Doc. 96-12248 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-M