alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5614 

To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from Haiti 

under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2023 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. LAWLER, Ms. 

WILSON of Florida, and Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic 

Recovery Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Haiti Economic Lift 

5 Program Extension Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5614 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULES FOR HAITI UNDER 

2 CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY 

3 ACT. 

4 Section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Re5 covery Act (19 U.S.C. 2703a) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

8 (i) by amending subparagraph 

9 (B)(v)(I) to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(I) APPLICABLE PERCENT11 AGE.—The term ‘applicable percent12 age’ means 60 percent or more during 

13 the period beginning on December 20, 

14 2017, and ending on September 30, 

15 2035.’’; and 

16 (ii) by amending subparagraph (C) to 

17 read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(C) QUANTITATIVE LIMITATIONS.—The 

19 preferential treatment described in subpara20 graph (A) shall be extended, during each period 

21 after the initial applicable 1-year period, to not 

22 more than 1.25 percent of the aggregate square 

23 meter equivalents of all apparel articles im24 ported into the United States in the most re25 cent 12-month period for which data are avail26 able.’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5614 IH

1 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘in each 

2 of the 16 succeeding 1-year periods’’ each place 

3 it appears and inserting ‘‘in any of the suc4 ceeding 1-year periods’’; and 

5 (2) by amending subsection (h) to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(h) TERMINATION.—The duty-free treatment pro8 vided under this section shall remain in effect until Sep9 tember 30, 2035.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. MODIFICATIONS TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF 

11 SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED STATES. 

12 The President shall proclaim such modifications as 

13 may be necessary to Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

14 United States to restore such special tariff treatment to 

15 articles that lost such treatment due to prior modifications 

16 made to U.S. notes, tariff headings, subheadings or statis17 tical suffixes in chapters 1 through 97 of the Harmonized 

18 Tariff System of the United States before the date of the 

19 enactment of this Act and remain eligible for such tariff 

20 treatment due to such section 213A as so amended. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Sherman ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY, Respondent.

No. WD 48531.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 19, 1994.

P. Terence Crebs, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Donna Ann Coleman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., C.J., and KENNEDY and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the decisions of the Administrative Hearing Commission and State Board of Pharmacy revoking his license to practice pharmacy.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.26(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12153]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages

Notice of Issuance of Certificate (Casualty)
    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. Sec. 817(d)) 
and the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 
C.F.R. Part 540, as amended:

Norwegian Cruise Line Limited (d/b/a Norwegain Cruise Line) and F & 
A Corp., Ltd., 95 Merrick Way, Coral Gables, Florida 33134/ Vessel: 
Royal Odyseey
    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12153 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 243 

Recognizing and promoting awareness of Chiari malformation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2009 

Mr. KANJORSKI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and promoting awareness of Chiari 

malformation. 

Whereas Chiari malformation, as recognized by the National 

Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, includes 

a complex group of disorders characterized by herniation 

of the cerebellum; 

Whereas the herniated tissue blocks the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain which can lead to the formation of a cavity within the spinal cord; 

Whereas symptoms of Type I Chiari malformation include severe headache, dizziness, vertigo, disequilibrium, visual 

disturbances, difficulty swallowing, heart palpitations, 

sleep apnea, impaired fine motor skills, chronic fatigue, 

and painful tingling of the hands and feet; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 243 IH 

Whereas because of the complex symptomology, patients with 

Type I Chiari malformation are frequently misdiagnosed; 

Whereas Type II Chiari malformation, also called ArnoldChiari malformation, is usually accompanied by a 

myelomeningocele, a form of spina bifida that occurs 

when the spinal canal and the backbone do not close before birth, causing the spinal cord to protrude through an 

opening in the back, which can result in partial or complete paralysis below the spinal opening; 

Whereas Type III Chiari malformation, the most serious 

form, results in severe and often irreversible neurological 

defects; 

Whereas treatment for this disorder is not a certain and definitive path, and medication may ease certain symptoms 

such as pain, but often surgery is the only treatment 

available to correct functional disturbances or halt the 

progression of damage to the central nervous system; 

Whereas until recently, Chiari malformation was regarded as 

a rare condition, but with the increased use of magnetic 

resonance imaging, the number of reported cases has 

risen from 200,000 to 2,000,000 Americans; 

Whereas new genetic studies support a hereditary tendency 

with a transmissibility rate of 12 percent; and 

Whereas the studies also found that women are three times 

more likely to be afflicted by the debilitating disorder 

than men: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives recognizes the importance of making citizens 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 243 IH 

1 of the United States aware of Chiari malformation and 

2 helps promote advocacy for this important cause. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit
32.3




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Leasing Fund
Eleven, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.







Date: November
13, 2009





/s/Anthony J.
Branca__


Anthony
J. Branca


Chief
Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Alfred J. SmallAlfred J. SmallChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
EX-10.1



 








EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT TO THE HUBBELL INCORPORATED

2005 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN




     WHEREAS, this Corporation maintains the Hubbell Incorporated 2005 Incentive Award Plan
(the “2005 Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.1 of the 2005 Plan, the Compensation Committee has the right
to amend the 2005 Plan subject to approval of the Board of Directors; and



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors of
this Corporation have determined that it is in the best interest of the Corporation to amend the
2005 Plan to comply with recently issued accounting guidance by providing for automatic adjustments
with respect to Class B Common Stock of the Corporation granted under the 2005 Plan following
certain corporate events affecting the Class B Common Stock or its share price;



     NOW, THEREFORE, immediately upon passage hereof, the 2005 Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     By substituting the following for Section 10.1 (a):




“(a) In the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or
exchange of shares, merger, consolidation, spin-off, recapitalization,
distribution of Company assets to stockholders (other than normal cash
dividends), or any other corporate event affecting the Stock or the share
price of the Stock, the Committee shall make such proportional and
equitable adjustments to reflect such changes with respect to (i) the
aggregate number and type of shares that may be issued under the Plan
(including, but not limited to, adjustments of the limitations in Sections
3.1 and 3.3); (ii) the terms and conditions of any outstanding Awards
(including, without limitation, any applicable performance targets or
criteria with respect thereto); and (iii) the grant or exercise price per
share for any outstanding Awards under the Plan. Any adjustment affecting
an Award intended as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation shall be made
consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.”



     I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the 2005 Incentive Award Plan was adopted by
the Board of Directors of this Corporation on September 13, 2006 at a duly held meeting thereof.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Richard W. Davies
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Richard W. Davies
	 

	 	 	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Dated: September 21, 2006






31
#### Frederic F. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 68776.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division One.

June 11, 1996.

Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

KAROHL, Judge.

The motion court denied movant, Frederic F. Brown’s, motion for Rule 24.035 relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion was timely filed after defendant was sentenced on guilty pleas on three charges: kidnapping, armed criminal action and forcible rape. The sentences on these pleas were in accord with a favorable plea bargain which *312included dismissal of charges of forcible rape and three charges of forcible sodomy. The court imposed two consecutive fifteen year sentences to be served concurrently with a term of life imprisonment.

Movant contends the motion court erred in finding his waiver of his right to a presen-tenee investigation was knowing and voluntary. The plea record confirms the court sentenced movant in accord with a plea agreement after it explained to him he had the right to a presentence investigation.

The contention is not reviewable in a Rule 24.035 motion and it is without merit. First, assuming the allegation is reviewable under the rule, it has no merit. Movant expressly waived a presentence investigation. He has a college education and a degree. He expressly acknowledged that he had received no promises or threats which coerced him in any way to waive his right to a presentence investigation. The plea record and the testimony of defendant’s counsel supports a finding that he knowingly and voluntarily waived that right. The findings of the motion court are therefore not clearly erroneous as required by Rule 24.035(j).

First, the allegation in the motion and the point on appeal are directed toward an unknowing or involuntary waiver of his right to a presentenee investigation, not an unknowing or involuntary plea of guilty. Mov-ant did not allege he has a right to withdraw his guilty pleas or that he wishes to withdraw the pleas. He did not allege and he does not now argue that the guilty pleas on which he was sentenced were unknowing or involuntary. For that reason the factual issue and the legal argument are not within the scope of Rule 24.035. He concedes that the guilty pleas were knowing and voluntary.

Movant contends his attorney was ineffective because he was misinformed about the use and prospect of a presentence investigation before he waived that “statutory” right. Rule 29.07(a)(1) provides that a pre-sentence investigation is discretionary, not mandatory. *State v. Jennings,*649 S.W.2d 448, 455 (Mo.App.1983). Assuming, without deciding the rule confers the right to a pre-sentence investigation, the source of that right is not constitutional. Neither the Federal nor the Missouri Constitution confers a right to a presentence investigation. It is a benefit subject to waiver and defendant waived it. As a matter of law, movant was not entitled to the relief he requested and now argues.

We affirm.

REINHARD, P.J. and GRIMM, J., concur.
| (1) | the      Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December      31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |               |                                       |   |
|--------------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March      11, 2010 | By:                | /s/      TIMOTHY E. BIXBY                  |   |
|                           | Name:         | Timothy      E. Bixby                      |   |
|                           | Title:        | President      and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                           |               | (principal      financial officer)         |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12000]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, FAR Secretariat; 
Stocking of Standard Form, SF 294, Subcontracting Report for Individual 
Contracts and SF 295, Summary Subcontract Report

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration/Office of Policy, Planning 
and Evaluation recently revised Standard Form, SF 294, Subcontracting 
Report for Individual Contracts and SF 295, Summary Subcontract Report. 
These forms are now authorized for local reproduction. You can obtain 
the camera copy in two ways:

On the internet. Address: http://www.gsa.gov/forms, or;
From CARM, Attn.: Barbara Williams, (202) 501-0581. You can request 
camera copy of both forms from General Services Administration (CARM), 
Attn.: Barbara Williams, (202) 501-0581.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Victoria Moss, General Services Administration, (202) 501-4764. 
This contact is for information on completing the form and interpreting 
the FAR only.

DATES: Effective May 14, 1996.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
Theodore D. Freed,
Chief, Forms Management Branch.
[FR Doc. 96-12000 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6980

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALVIN B. TRUESDALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-6154

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALVIN B. TRUESDALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, 

District Judge. (3:92-cr-00034-RLV-1)

Submitted: October 28, 2016 Decided: December 16, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Bernard Truesdale, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Truesdale appeals from the district court’s orders 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of 

his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual, denying his motion for reconsideration of that 

order and of the order denying an earlier § 3582(c)(2) motion, and 

denying his motions for a hearing. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Truesdale, 

No. 3:92-cr-00034-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016 & Jul. 29, 2016). 

We deny Truesdale’s motions for appointment of counsel and for 

release on bail pending resolution of these appeal. We further 

deny as moot his motion to include the district court’s amended 

judgment in the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * To the extent that Truesdale sought reconsideration of the 

orders addressing his § 3582(c)(2) motions, we note that a district 

court has no authority to reconsider its decision on a sentence 

reduction motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). United States v.

Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010).
#### John M. DURHAM, III, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael J. BARNSTEAD, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67650.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Jan. 9, 1996.

Jerome Cramer Simon, St. Louis, James H. Heller, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant.

Sharon A. Agee, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s order denying his Rule 74.06(b)(2) motion to set aside a judgment for fraud and granting Plaintiffs motion to quash further discovery and for sanctions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their use only explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the action of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Plaintiffs motion for damages for frivolous appeal is denied.