alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12094]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), announcement is made of the 
following National Advisory bodies scheduled to meet during the month 
of June 1996.

    Name: National Advisory Council on the National Health Service 
Corps.
    Date and Time: June 6-9, 1996.
    Place: Adams Mark Denver Hotel, 1550 Court Place, Denver, 
Colorado.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: Agenda items include status of NHSC programs and budget, 
reports on the NHSC alumni study and the NHSC alumni and support 
network, meetings of NHSC workgroups on State activities, health 
systems liaison, and alliance development, and site visits to 
community health centers in the Denver area.
    The meeting will begin on Thursday, June 6 at 4:00 p.m. and 
adjourn at 8:00 p.m. Site visits will occur on Friday morning 
followed by an afternoon business meeting which will conclude about 
5:00 p.m. On Saturday, the meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m. and 
adjourn at 5:00 p.m. and Sunday's meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m. 
and adjourn at 12:00 noon.
    The meeting is open to the public; however, no transportation 
will be provided for the site visits. For further information, call 
Ms. Jewel Davis at (301) 594-4144.

    Anyone requiring information regarding the subject Council should 
contact Ms. Jewel Davis, National Advisory Council on the National 
Health Service Corps, 8th floor, 4350 East West Highway, Rockville, 
Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 594-4144.

    Name: Council on Graduate Medical Education.
    Date and Time: June 12, 1996, 1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.; June 13, 
1996, 8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Place: Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20008.
    This meeting is open to the Public.
    Agenda: The agenda will include two plenary panels to discuss 
(1) Minorities in Medicine and (2) Medical Education Consortia. 
There will be reports and updates on the Work Groups: Minorities in 
Medicine; Geographic Distribution/Medical Education Consortia; 
Physician Competencies in a Managed Care World; and IMG entry and 
Participation in the physician workforce.

    Anyone requiring information regarding the subject should contact 
F. Lawrence Clare, M.D., M.P.H., Deputy Executive Secretary, telephone 
(301) 443-6326, Council on Graduate Medical Education, Division of 
Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Service 
Administration, Room 9A-27, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Jackie E. Baum,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, HRSA.
[FR Doc. 96-12094 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 5,2010
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Martin F. Petersen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 on Form 10-K/A of Raser Technologies, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.*



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 21, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/ MARTIN F. PETERSEN 
|                     |  |  |  | Martin F. Petersen,    
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



|* | Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the form of certification are omitted because this Amendment No.1 on Form 10-K/A does not include the information as to which such paragraphs relate.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
C HR ISTOPHER

O’ SHEA; GISELE R OGER S; JEFF ADAM S, individua ls, on be ha lf of the m se lve s a

nd a ll othe rs sim ila rly situa te d, Plaintiffs - Appe lla nts, v. EPSON AM ER IC A, INC ., a C a lifornia c orporation; EPSON AC C ESSOR IES, INC ., a C a lifornia

c orporation; SEIKO EPSON C ORPOR

ATION, a

Ja pa ne s e c orporation, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 11-57105 D.C . No. 2:09-c v-08063-PSG-C W M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Philip S. Gutie rre z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d an d Subm i tte d De c e m be r 3, 2013 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : PREGER SON, B E R ZON, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc u it Judge s. 

# FIL ED APR 01 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.Pla intiffs a ppe a l the distric t

c o urt’ s pa

rtia l sum m ary judgm e n t in fa

vor of Epson Am e ric a

Inc ., Epson Ac c e ssorie s , Inc ., a nd Se iko Epson C o rpora tion (c olle c tive ly , “ Epson” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm
. W e re vie w de novo the distric t c ourt’ s ruling on a m otion for sum

m ary judgm e nt. SEC

v . C MK M Diamonds, Inc
. , 729 F.3d 1248, 1255 (9th C ir. 2013).

“ Sum m ary judgm e nt m ay be a ffirm e d on a n y ground supporte d

by the re c ord.” C row l e y v . N e v . e x re l. N e v . Se c ’yof State , 678 F.3d 730, 734 (9th C ir. 2012). Pla intiffs a lle ge tha

t Epson fa ile d to disc lose m ate ria l inform a tion a bout Epson inkje t printe rs a

nd ink c artridge s. On its we b site , Epson disc lose s tha t it te sts ink c artridge s in a c c orda nc e with industry sta

nda rds. The we bsite a lso disc lose s de ta ile d

inform a tion a

bout how Epson c a lc ulate s its ink c artridge te sting
m e tric (ink y ie ld) a

nd sta te s tha t no single

sta nda rd duplic a te s a

c ustom e r’ s a c tua l printe r usa ge . Unde r C a lifornia

la w, a pla intiff a lle ging fra

u d by om ission m

ust e sta blish a c tua l re lia

n c e by de m onstra

ting “ that ha d the om itte d inform a tion be e n disc lose d, [he or she ] would ha

v e be e n a ware of it a

nd be have d diffe re n t ly .” Mirk in v
. W asse rman , 858 P.2d 568, 574 (C a l. 1993). He re , Pla intiffs a re una ble to de m onstra

te a c tua l re lia

n c e be c a use none of the Pla intiffs re a d Epson’ s disc losure s -2-. B e c a

use Pla intiffs c ann ot de m onstra te a c tua l re l ia

nc e , Pla intiffs’ om issionba se d c la im s fa il. AFFIRM E D .

-3-
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4716

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 17, 2021.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

      ( print page 31543)    
Dated: June 10, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-12565 Filed 6-10-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit
10.2


Senior
Housing Properties Trust


400
Centre Street

Newton, MA 02458


March 13, 2006


Five Star Quality Care
Trust 400

Centre Street


Newton, MA 02458


Attention: Bruce J.
Mackey


Re:                               Second
Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as of November 19, 2004 (as amended,
the “Lease”)


Dear Bruce:


The purpose of this
letter is to confirm that, pursuant to Section 4.1.1(b) of the Lease, Valley
View was sold on December 31, 2005. The net proceeds of the sale received were
$2,676,448.00. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2006, Minimum Rent payable
under the Lease shall be reduced by $267,644.80 per annum.


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ John R. Hoadley

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  John R. Hoadley

  
	
  Acknowledged and Agreed:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Five Star Quality Care Trust

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Bruce J. Mackey Jr.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Bruce J. Mackey, Jr.

  
	
   

  	
  Treasurer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel D. DAVID, Appellant.

Nos. WD 49213, WD 51259.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 26, 1996.

Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Daniel D. David appeals his conviction of tampering with a witness in *332violation of Section 575.270, RSMo 1986. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5995 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5995

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that civilian service 
  in a temporary position after December 31, 1988, may be creditable 
 service under the Federal Employees Retirement System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2023

  Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Valadao, and Mr. Bacon) 
                     introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

       Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that civilian service 
  in a temporary position after December 31, 1988, may be creditable 
 service under the Federal Employees Retirement System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Retirement Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. CREDITABLE SERVICE FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES SERVING AFTER 1988.

    (a) In General.--Section 8411(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``performed before January 1, 1989,''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to any individual who is an employee (as that term is defined in 
paragraph (11) of section 8401 of title 5, United States Code), 
including temporary employees of the United States Postal Service, or a 
Member (as that term is defined in paragraph (20) of such section) on 
or after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Notification.--The Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management shall notify agency Chief Human Capital Officers or other 
appropriate agency officials for purposes of providing notice to 
employees and Members who are eligible to make a deposit for service by 
operation of the amendment made by subsection (a).
    (d) Regulations.--The Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management shall promulgate regulations to carry out this Act and the 
amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The STATE of Texas, Appellee, v. Miguel Angel GARCIA, Appellant.

No. 0971-95.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Nov. 22, 1995.

Melaina Hood, Boerne, for appellant.

Edward F. Shaughnessy, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, Robert A. Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

BAIRD, Judge,

dissenting to refusal of appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

I respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision to summarily refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Those who seek review by this Court should know that we demand strict compliance with the applicable rules of appellate procedure before we will exercise our discretionary jurisdiction. *Degrate v. State,*712 S.W.2d 755 (Tex.Cr.App.1986). And, our policy is to summarily refuse those petitions which are not in compliance. *See, Salinas v. State,*897 S.W.2d 785, 786 (Tex.Cr.App.1995) (Baird, J., concurring). The petition is refused pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 202(d)(9) which provides:

> The Court may *strike, order redrawn or summarily refuse*any petition for discretionary review that is unnecessarily lengthy or is not prepared in conformity with these rules. (Emphasis added)

In the instant case, the petition is in compliance with all of the applicable rules except Tex.R.App.P. 202(d)(8) which requires that a *500copy of the court of appeals’ opinion be attached as an appendix to the petition. Appellant has attempted but failed to comply with this rule because the appendix contains only the odd-numbered pages of the opinion. The opinion consists of five pages, which means the appendix does not contain pages two and four. Refusing the petition for this obvious oversight is an extremely harsh result. In the instant ease, rather than demanding such hyper-technical compliance, we should order the petition redrawn. Because the majority fails to do so, I respectfully dissent.

OVERSTREET and MALONEY, JJ., join this opinion.
##### 



WARRANT TO PURCHASE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
 Los Angeles, California
    
    ___________, 2007
  Exercise of Warrant
 1




---



##### 



Method of Payment
 Expenses of Issuance
 Withholding Taxes
 Reservation of Shares
 Fractional Shares
 Exchange or Assignment of Warrant
 2




---



##### 



Rights of the Holder; Limitation on Liability
 Adjustment of Exercise Rights
 Dividends
 Effect of Split-ups and Split-down and Certain Dividends
 Statement of Adjusted Exercise Price
 3




---



##### 



Effect of Merger or Consolidation
 Reorganization and Reclassification
 Distributions
 4




---



##### 



Dissolution or Liquidation
 Limitations on Transfer of Warrant Stock
     5




---



##### 



Notices
 If
to the Company
 
 With
a copy to
 
 If
to the Holder
 
 Governing Law
 6




---



##### 



Controversy
 Further Assurances
 Severability
 Parties in Interest
 Entire Agreement
  SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
 By:
    SPECIMENIts: 7
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Elva International, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
Misko,  Chief  Financial  Officer (or the  equivalent  thereof) of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Patrick Misko
-------------------------
Patrick Misko
Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
April 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF CORVU CORPORATION

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                         |   | **Jurisdiction  of Incorporation** |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   |                               |   |
| CorVu North America Inc.                       |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| CorVu Australiasia Pty Ltd.                    |   | New South  Wales, Australia        |   |
| CorVu Plc                                      |   | U.K.                               |   |
| Subsidiaries of CorVu Plc:                     |   |                               |   |
| CorVu Benelux B.V.                             |   | Netherlands                        |   |
| CorVu Deutschland GmbH                         |   | Germany                            |   |
| CorVu Software Marketing, Inc.                 |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| Subsidiary of CorVu Software Marketing,  Inc.: |   |                               |   |
| CorVu Software, Ltd.                           |   | U.K.                               |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32**

 

**ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**For the Three months Ended March 31, 2006**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| This 12th day of May, 2006 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       |
| /s/ Mark Stevens           |   |
| Chief Executive Officer    |
|                       |
|                       |
| /s/ Carol Soto             |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |
|                            |  |  |

 

----
H. Res. 257 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 19, 2009. 

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the 

legislative day of March 19, 2009, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules relating to a 

measure addressing excessive compensation paid to employees 

of corporations in which the Federal government has a significant interest. 

Attest: 

Clerk.