alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Financial Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      we, Jerald L. Fenstermaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, and J. Kevin Maxwell, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Jerald L. FenstermakerJerald
                L. FenstermakerPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)November
                6, 2008/s/
                J. Kevin MaxwellJ.
                Kevin MaxwellTreasurer
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)November
                6, 2008
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 31 

Expressing support for designation of January 28, 2009, as ‘‘National Data 

Privacy Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. STEARNS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of January 28, 2009, 

as ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’. 

Whereas the Internet and the capabilities of modern technology cause data privacy issues to figure prominently in 

the lives of many people in the United States at work, 

in their interaction with government and public authorities, in the health field, in e-commerce transactions, and 

online generally; 

Whereas many individuals are unaware of data protection 

and privacy laws generally and of specific steps that can 

be taken to help protect the privacy of personal information online; 

Whereas ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’ constitutes an international collaboration and a nationwide and statewide efVerDate Nov 24 2008 05:03 Jan 08, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR31.IH HR31

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 31 IH 

fort to raise awareness about data privacy and the protection of personal information on the Internet; 

Whereas government officials from the United States and 

Europe, privacy professionals, academics, legal scholars, 

representatives of international businesses, and others 

with an interest in data privacy issues are working together on this date to further the discussion about data 

privacy and protection; 

Whereas privacy professionals and educators are being encouraged to take the time to discuss data privacy and 

protection issues with teens in high schools across the 

country; 

Whereas the recognition of ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’ will 

encourage more people nationwide to be aware of data 

privacy concerns and to take steps to protect their personal information online; and 

Whereas January 28, 2009, would be an appropriate day to 

designate as ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Data Privacy Day’’; 

4 (2) encourages State and local governments to 

5 observe the day with appropriate activities that pro6 mote awareness of data privacy; 

7 (3) encourages privacy professionals and edu8 cators to discuss data privacy and protection issues 

9 with teens in high schools across the United States; 

10 and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 31 IH 

1 (4) encourages individuals across the Nation to 

2 be aware of data privacy concerns and to take steps 

3 to protect their personal information online. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133321 & (55) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 133321 

 COA: 264828 
 Wayne CC: 05-001349

ANTHONY GRAY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED. 

t0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)

In
connection with the annual report of I-many, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers of I-many, Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN A.
RADE                                                                
|Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer)  March 30,
2009



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    KEVIN M. HARRIS                                                            
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)

March 30, 2009
EXHIBIT
      32.2


STATEMENT
        REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BMX Development Corp.
        (FKA
        Biometrix International, Inc.) for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
        as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), I, Dean A. Stewart, our Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 *   the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our
        consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
 
 /s/
        Dean A. Stewart
 Dean
        A.
        Stewart
 
 
 May
        14,
        2008
 
 This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section
        18 of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
#### Lowell DUNN, Sr., Lowell Dunn, II, and Betwell Oil & Gas Co., Appellants, v. CANADIAN OIL & GAS SERVICES, INC., Dunn Equities, Inc., and C.E. Dunn, Appellees.

No. 08-93-00360-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

Oct. 20, 1995.

Vincent L. Marable, III, Paul Webb, P.C., Wharton, Brad Miller, Harper Estes, Lynch, Chappell & Alsup, Midland, Luther Soules, *324III, Soules & Wallace, San Antonio, for appellants.

G. Bert Smith, Jr., Law Offices of G. Bert Smith, Inc., Andrews, Raymond E. White, Kemp, Smith, Duncan & Thurmond, El Paso, for appellees.

Before LARSEN, MeCLURE and CHEW, JJ.

*OPINION ON JOINT MOTION TO REVERSE JUDGMENT AND REMAND CASE*

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our opinion of October 18, 1995 and substitute the following in its place.

The Court has considered the parties’ joint agreed motion to reverse judgment and remand case to the trial court. It appears to the Court that the parties have agreed to settle this dispute, and such agreement includes further action by the trial court in releasing certain funds held in the registry of the Court, releasing and discharging the su-persedeas bond filed by the Appellant Lowell Dunn, Sr., and dismissing the suit with prejudice to the rights of any party to refile same against any other party. In order that the trial court shall be accorded jurisdiction to accomplish these matters and effectuate the settlement agreement of the parties, Appellants and Appellees have jointly requested the Court to reverse the June 3, 1993 Judgment and remand the case to the 109th Judicial District Court of Andrews County, Texas. This Court may enter orders pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 59(a)(1) (authorizing the Court to dispose of an appeal in accordance with an agreement of the parties), Tex.R.App.P. 59(a)(2) (authorizing the court upon motion by appellant to affirm the judgment or dismiss the appeal with the judgment remaining intact), or Tex.R.App.P. 80(b) (authorizing the Court to affirm, correct or reform, reverse and render, or reverse and remand the judgment).

We recognize the dilemma posed by the current rules and the difficulty encountered by parties desiring to settle their dispute during the pendency of the appeal. *See Panterra Corporation v. American Dairy Queen,*908 S.W.2d 300 (Tex.App. — San Antonio, 1995, n.w.h.). We also recognize that public policy favors settlements, *Elbaor v. Smith,*845 S.W.2d 240, 250 (Tex.1992) and the efficient administration of justice, Tex.R.Civ.P. 1. We applaud Justice Duncan’s dissent in *Panterra Corporation.*

Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 59(a)(1)(A) and 80(b), we reverse and remand this cause to the trial court to effectuate the settlement of the parties.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19075-19076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10601]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Announces the Following 
Meeting

    Name: Scientific and Technical Discussion of the Draft Document, 
``Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposures to 
Metalworking Fluids (MWFs).''
    Times and Dates: 9 a.m.-5:30 p.m., June 13, 1996. 9 a.m.-5:30 
p.m., June 14, 1996.
    Place: Drawbridge Inn, Yeomans Hall, I-75 and Buttermilk Pike, 
Fort Mitchell, Kentucky 41017.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 50 people.
    Purpose: The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the 
scientific and technical content of the draft NIOSH document, 
``Criteria For a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposures to 
Metalworking Fluids (MWFs),'' prior to finalizing the criteria 
document for publication and transmittal to the Department of Labor. 
This review will focus on all aspects of the criteria document 
including: composition and formulation of MWFs, potential adverse 
health effects from exposure to MWFs, occupational exposure data, 
and the feasibility of controlling exposures to the NIOSH 
recommended exposure limit of 0.5 mg/m\3\ (total particulate).
    Contact Persons for More Information: Technical information may 
be obtained from Brenda Boutin, NIOSH, CDC, 4676 Columbia Parkway, 
M/S C-32, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, telephone 513/533-8345, e-mail 
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="107878717c505e595f435444213e757d3e7374733e777f663e">[email protected]</a>
    Persons wishing to attend or make a presentation at the meeting, 
obtain a copy of

[[Page 19076]]

the criteria document, or reserve overnight accommodations at the 
Drawbridge Inn, should respond by May 10, 1996, to Kellie Wilson, 
NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, M/S C-34, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, 
telephone 513/533-8362, fax 513/533-8588, e-mail address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="650e081555252b2c2a362131544b00084b0601064b">[email protected]</a> gov. Information may also be obtained by 
calling 1-800-35-NIOSH or by the Internet NIOSH Homepage: http:/
www.cdc.gov/niosh/homepage. htm1.

    Dated: April 23, 1996.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 96-10601 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-19-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12468]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 500-1]


Comparator Systems Corp; Order of Suspension of Trading

    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that questions 
that have been raised about the adequacy and accuracy of publicly-
disseminated information about Comparator Systems Corp. concerning, 
among other things, the assets recorded on its financial statements.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, May 14, 1996 
through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on May 28, 1996.

    By the Commission.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12468 Filed 5-14-96; 2:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24764-24765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12226]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Defense Mapping Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, the Defense Mapping Agency announces the proposed 
extension of a currently approved public information collection

[[Page 24765]]

and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are 
invited on: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the 
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed 
information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize 
the burden of the information collection on respondents, including 
through the use of automated collection techniques for other forms of 
information.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by July 15, 
1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposed 
extension should be sent to the Chief of Staff Administrative Policy 
(CSA), Defense Mapping Agency, mail stop A-25, 8613 Lee Highway, 
Fairfax, VA 22031-2137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
To request more information on this proposed information collection or 
to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, 
please write to the above address or call CSA, (703) 275-8456.
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Control Number: Port Information 
Report, DMA Form 8330-1, OMB control number 0704-0210.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to evaluate and provide updated material to DMA for navigational 
safety.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit; Federal agencies 
or employees.
    Annual Burden Hours: 100.
    Number of Respondents: 100.
    Responses Per Respondent: 2.
    Average Burden Per Response: 0.5 hour.
    Frequency: On occasion.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Summary of Information Collection

    Respondents include navigators of military vessels and merchant 
ships. Respondents provide navigational data and information. Data is 
analyzed and stored by personnel in the Navigation Information and 
Services Department. If the information was not collected it could mean 
lack of data for quality charts and publications to DMA customers and 
for preventing potential maritime disasters.

    Dated: May 10, 1996.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-12226 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Travis CARTER, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 539-87.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Nov. 23, 1988.

Steven H. Swander, court appointed on appeal, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Tim Curry, Dist. Atty., C. Chris Marshall and Cindy Singleton, Asst. Dist. Attys., Fort Worth, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of aggravated sexual assault. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at sixty years.

On direct appeal, appellant argued the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the law concerning good time and parole, inasmuch as the charge is predicated upon an unconstitutional statute. The Court of Appeals rejected appellant’s challenge to Article 37.07, Section 4, V.A.C.C.P. *Carter v. State,*727 S.W.2d 108 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, 1987).

In his petition for discretionary review, appellant urges the Court of Appeals erred in holding Article 37.07, Section 4, supra, is constitutional. We find appellant is correct.

In *Rose v. State,*752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), this Court determined that Article 37.07, Section 4, is unconstitutional. Under *Rose,*it is still necessary for the Court of Appeals to conduct a harmless error analysis under the guidelines of Tex. R.App.P. 81(b)(2).

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and this cause is remanded to that Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harvey Lalach, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anavex Life Sciences
      Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | information contained in the quarterly report on Form
      10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Anavex Life Sciences
Corp.                               

Date: May 21, 2010

/s/ Harvey LalachHarvey
LalachPresident, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00076-CR

ELIGAH DARNELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1575071D)

November 10, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
#### In the Matter of East New York Savings Bank Depositors Litigation. Rita Wechsler et al., Appellants, v Paul B. Murray et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on August 28, 1989, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Ira Gammerman, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kassal, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ. *[See,*145 Misc 2d 620.]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of BMX Development Corp.
      (FKA Biometrix International, Inc.) for the six months ended June 30, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Michael J. Bongiovanni, our President, Chief Executive Officer,
      certify that:





*   the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*   information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our
      consolidated financial condition and results of operations.







/s/
      Michael J. Bongiovanni


Michael
      J. Bongiovanni


President,
      Chief Executive Officer








July
      27,
      2007







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.