alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Moses, Chief Financial Officer of STEC, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DAN MOSESDan MosesChief Financial Officer


March 17, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]



## In the



# United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 24

- 10622

Non

- Argument Calendar

OPVHHJV LLC,

d.b.a. Pathway Property Management,

HPA II BORROWER 2021

- 1 LLC,

versus

RICHARD CORNELIUS, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

Defendant

- Appellant,

ANY OTHER OCCUPANTS, USCA11 Case: 24-10622 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 24

- 10622

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 1:23

- cv

- 06030

- VMC

Before W ILSON

, N EWSOM

, and G RANT

, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdic

tion. The district court’s order remanding the action to Georgia

state court is not reviewable on appeal because the district court

based its remand on a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation , 114 F .3d

1092, 1095

- 96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness,

Inc. v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc

., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).

Further, the notice of removal did not cite 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or

1443 as a basis for removal.

No petition for re hearing may be filed unless it complies

with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all

other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 24-10622 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24804-24805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12246]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WO-350-1430-01]


Information Collection Submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget for Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    The proposal for the collection of information listed below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms 
may be obtained by contacting the Bureau's Clearance Officer at the 
phone number listed below. Comments and suggestions on the proposal 
should be made directly to the Bureau Clearance Officer and to the

[[Page 24805]]

Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1004-
0153), Washington, DC 20503, telephone 202-395-7340.
    Title Conveyance of Federally Owned Mineral Interests, 43 CFR 2720.
    OMB Approval Number: 1004-0153.
    Abstract: Respondents supply identifying information to be used by 
the agency to process applications to determine an applicant's 
eligibility for benefits and whether all statutory requirements have 
been met.
    Bureau form number: None.
    Frequency: Once.
    Description of respondents: Individuals whose land surface 
ownership overlie federally owned mineral interests.
    Estimated completion time: 8 hours.
    Annual responses: 20.
    Annual burden hours: 232.
    Bureau clearance officer: Wendy Spencer, 303-236-6642.
H. James Fox,
Group Administrator, Realty Use.
[FR Doc. 96-12246 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ John Karlsson

John Karlsson
Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

July 9, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 15 - 00413
- CR EX PARTE JAMES RAY B ROSSETT

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015
- 1932
- C2A

CONCURRING AND DISSE NTING OPINION
This case presents the problem when an appellate court determines the amount of bail set by the trial court is excessive and then proceeds to set bail. If the trial court had set bail in this case at $1,000,000, I would not hold that was an abuse of discr etion. The trial court set bail at $5,000,000. I agree with the Court that $5,000,000 is excessive. The State conceded that $5,000,000 was effectively the denial of bail but that the State had not sought the total denial of bail as it otherwise might ha ve been able to do. See T EX
. C ODE
C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. arts 17.152 and 17.153 (West 2005). But having determined bail was excessive, the Court then proceeds to set bail in an amount it determines is appropriate. We do not review this amount. This CourtE x parte Brossett Page 2

det ermines the amount. As for me, I do not understand why we, as an appellate court, should in the first instance set the amount of bail we think is appropriate. All we have is a cold record before us. I would much prefer a remand to allow the trial court to set the amount and conditions of bail it deems appropriate and leave this Court to review the trial court’s order. See Ex parte Hicks , 262 S.W.3d 387 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2008, no pet.) (Gray, C.J, dissenting note); Ex parte Mayfield , No. 10

- 07

- 00304

- CR, 20 07 Tex. App. LEXIS 9758 (App.

— Waco 2007, no pet.) (Gray, C.J., dissenting note); Ex parte Davis , 147 S.W.3d 546, 554 n. 1 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2004, no pet.) (Gray, C.J., dissenting). Furthermore, I find it interesting that we set one aspect of bail, the amoun t, but
remand to the trial court for a determination of the conditions of bail. These conditions of bail could impact the appropriateness of the amount of bail. Moreover, if I am compelled by Court of Criminal Appeals precedent to set bail in
the first instance rather than review the amount determined by a trial court, in this proceeding I would set bail at no more than $750,000. That amount appears adequate to assure Brossett’s presence at trial; particularly if it is accompanied with other conditions of bail such as his surrender of all, and a prohibition from obtaining additional, firearms, knives, and other weapons, surrender of Brossett’s passport, if any, a prohibition from any contact with the surviving victims, all being the children of the decea sed victim, and an order to wear a GPS tracking device to assure that Brossett does not go within 1,250 yards of them.E x parte Brossett Page 3

Thus, I must concur in part and dissent in part to the Court’s judgment.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Concurring and dissenting opinion delivered and filed April 28, 2016 Publish
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jack D. REYNOLDS, Movant-Appellant.

No. WD 40718.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 1, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 3, 1989.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 14, 1989.

Sean D. O’Brien, Public Defender, David S. Durbin, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., William J. Swift, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from a jury conviction for the offense of sodomy, in violation of § 566.060, RSMo 1986.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 29.-15.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 380 

Expressing support for designation of April as ‘‘National Donate Life Month’’ 

and expressing gratitude to all Americans who have communicated their 

intent to be organ and tissue donors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mr. WU, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. REYES, Mr. BILBRAY, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Mr. CLAY, and Mr. CAMP) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of April as ‘‘National 

Donate Life Month’’ and expressing gratitude to all 

Americans who have communicated their intent to be 

organ and tissue donors. 

Whereas the national waiting list for those awaiting organ 

transplants has increased in the past 10 years from 

60,000 to more than 100,000 people; 

Whereas there exists a persistent and severe shortage of organs donated for transplantation because donation has 

not increased at a pace to provide transplantation for 

these people; 

Whereas a single individual’s donation of heart, lungs, liver, 

kidneys, pancreas, and small intestine can save up to 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 380 IH 

eight lives, and the donation of tissue can save and enhance the lives of up to 50 others; 

Whereas transplantation is the therapy of choice, and frequently the only option, to ease patient suffering, restore 

patient health, and allow patients to lead more productive 

lives; 

Whereas modern medicine has progressed to allow exponentially more successful transplant surgeries to be performed, but thousands of people still die while on the 

waiting list each year for lack of organ donations; 

Whereas in addition to public health concerns, there are also 

enormous savings to the United States health care system that can be realized by increasing organ donation 

and transplantation nationally; and 

Whereas the month of April would be an appropriate month 

to designate as ‘‘National Donate Life Month’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives— 

3 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National Do4 nate Life Month’’; 

5 (2) expresses its support and gratitude to all 

6 Americans who have communicated their intent to 

7 be organ and tissue donors upon their deaths; 

8 (3) encourages those Americans who are not al9 ready donors to consider their organ, blood and tis10 sue donation options; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 380 IH 

1 (4) supports the many public events that will be 

2 conducted in April in every State to thank donors 

3 and donor families and to publicize the organ short4 age. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1233]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration


Job Corps: Final Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the 
New Jobs Corps Center on the Loring AFB in Caribou, ME

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of Final Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for 
the new Job Corps Center on the Loring AFB.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(CEQ) (40 CFR part 1500-08) implementing procedural provisions of the 
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Employment and Training 
Administration (ETA) of the Department of Labor (DOL) gives final 
notice of the proposed construction of the new Loring AFB Job Corps 
Center and that this construction will not have a significant adverse 
impact on the environment. In accordance with 29 CFR 11.11(d)(1) (DOL's 
NEPA Compliance Procedures) and 40 CFR 1501.4(e)(2) (CEQ Requirement 
Making FONSIs Available for Public Review), the preliminary FONSI for 
the new Job Corps Center on the Loring AFB was published in the 
November 16, 1995 Federal Register (60 FR 57596). No comments were 
received regarding the preliminary FONSI for the new Job Corps Center 
on the Loring AFB. ETA has reviewed the conclusion of the environmental 
assessment (EA). This notice serves as the Final Finding of No 
Significant Impact for the new Job Corps Center on the Loring AFB. The 
preliminary FONSI and the EA are adopted in final with no change.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 25, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the EAs and additional information regarding the 
above-mentioned new Job Corps Center are available to interested 
parties by writing to the Director, Office of Job Corps, Employment and 
Training Administration, Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., 
NW., Room N4510, Washington, DC 20210.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Milam, Department of Labor, Office of Job Corps, 200 Constitution 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC, (202) 219-5556 (This is not a toll-free 
call).

    Dated at Washington, DC, this 22 day of January, 1996.
Mary Silva,
Acting Director of Job Corps.
[FR Doc. 96-1233 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12162]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Royal Production Company, Big Thicket National Preserve, Hardin 
County, Texas; Availability of Plan of Operations and Environmental 
Assessment Drilling an Exploratory Oil Well

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 9.52(b) of Title 
36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9, Subpart B, that the 
National Park Service has received from Royal Production Company a Plan 
of Operations to drill an exploratory oil well in Big Thicket National 
Preserve, located within Hardin County, Texas.
    The Plan of Operations and Environmental Assessment are available 
for public review and comment for a period of 30 days from the 
publication date of this notice. The documents can be viewed during 
normal business hours at the Office of the Superintendent, Big Thicket 
National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, Texas. Copies can be 
requested from the Superintendent, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 
Milam, Beaumont, TX 77701.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Richard R. Peterson,
Superintendent, Big Thicket National Preserve.
[FR Doc. 96-12162 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12911]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 1951-036]

Georgia Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

May 17, 1996.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA is for an application to grant a permit to Mr. Peter Lenzenhuber 
for dredging at the Sinclair Project, FERC No. 1951. The project is 
located on Lake Sinclair in Putnam County, Georgia. The primary purpose 
of the dredging would be to increase recreational access to a proposed 
subdivision, Edgewater Point Estates.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be viewed at 
the Commission's Reference and Information Center, Room 2A, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426. Copies can also be obtained by 
calling the project manager, Heather Campbell at (202) 219-3097.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12911 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Arvil ADKIRSON, Employee/Respondent, v. PARSON’S LUMBER COMPANY, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 67428.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 18, 1995.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joseph Daigre, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for appellant.

Robert E. Keaney, St. Louis, for employee.

Stephen P. Gray, Marble Hill, for employer.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The custodian of the Second Injury Fund (Fund) appeals from the Industrial and Labor Relations Commission’s (Commission) award, affirming and adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s award, finding the Fund liable for claimant’s temporary total disability of $1,726.18, permanent partial disability of $16,246.40, and permanent total disability of $101.54 for life beginning 177 weeks after the accident. The Fund was also found liable for payment of claimant’s medical expenses. We affirm.

The Commission’s award is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the *370whole record. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
Case 2:17-mj-00492-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00492-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00492-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00492-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") Kenneth Bosket, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Kenneth BosketKenneth BosketChief Executive OfficerDated: March __, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report), Lowell Holden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Lowell HoldenLowell HoldenChief Financial OfficerDated: March31, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.