Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Notices 24815

TA–W–32,136; Softwear, Doniphan,

MO: March 14, 1995.

TA–W–32,150; Wavetek Corp., San

Diego, CA: March 15, 1995.

TA–W–32,064; Turbotville Dress, Inc.,

Turbotville, PA: March 1, 1995.

TA–W–32,072; BR Holding Ltd,

Racine Steel, PA: March 12, 1995.

TA–W–32,037; Century Place, Inc.,

Cutting Div., Salisbury, NC: February 22,

1995.

TA–W–31,950; Raintree Buckles &

Jewelry, Inc., North Hollywood, CA:

February 6, 1995.

TA–W–32,077; SPX Corp., Kent-Moore

Div., Jackson, MI: March 5, 1995.

TA–W–32,078; SPX Corp., Kent Moore

Distribution Center, Roseville, MI:

March 5, 1995.

TA–W–31,969; Hasbro Manufacturing

Service, El Paso, TX: March 16, 1996.

TA–W–32,032; Oregon Cedar Products

Co., Springfield, OR: February 15, 1995.

TA–W–32,035; Price Pfister, Racoima,

CA: February 19, 1995.

TA–W–32,041; Manhattan Fashions,

Inc., Union City, NJ: February 27, 1995.

TA–W–32,147; Terminal Fabrication,

Inc., Freeport, IL: February 28, 1995.

TA–W–32,169; Diversified Apparel

Resources, Inc., Pulaski, VA: March 21,

1995.

TA–W–32,204; Cenex, Inc.,

Bakersfield, CA: March 25, 1995.

TA–W–31,913; The Florsheim Shoe

Co., Cape Girardeau, MO: May 17, 1995.

TA–W–32,174; Suzette Fashion, Jersey

City, NJ: March 19, 1995.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of April, 1996.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) that a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers; firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) that sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) that imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases in imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) that there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–00898; Oshkosh

B’Gosh, Columbia Cutting, Columbia,

KY

NAFTA–TAA–00845; Holliston Mills,

Inc., Kingsport, TN

NAFTA–TAA–00874; 3M Company,

Data Storage Products, Wahpeton, ND

NAFTA–TAA–00894; BR Holdings,

Ltd., Racine Steel Castings, Racine, WI

NAFTA–TAA–00872; Western

Interlock, Inc., Dallas, OR

NAFTA–TAA–00917 & A; SPX Corp.,

Kent-Moore Div., Jackson, MI, SPX

Corp., Kent-Moore Distribution Center,

Roseville, MI

NAFTA–TAA–00883; Tampella Power

Corp., Williamsport, PA

NAFTA–TAA–00828; Raintree,

Buckles & Jewelry, Inc., North

Hollywood, CA

NAFTA–TAA–00863; Silgan

Containers Corp., Hillsboro, OR

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

NAFTA–TAA–00862; Worldcrisa

Corp., Wallingford, CT

NAFTA–TAA–00893; Panhandle

Eastern Corp., d/b/a Panenergy Corp.,

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Div., Pan

Service Co. Div., Trunkline Gas Co. Div.,

Houston, TX & Operating in Other

States

The investigation revealed that the

workers of the subject firm did not

produce an article within the meaning

of Section 250(a) of the Trade Act, as

amended.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

NAFTA–TAA–00848; Pal Plastics

Corp., Rochester, NY: February 21,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00878; Oregon Cedar

Products Co., Springfield, OR: February

15, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00865; Century Place,

Inc., Cutting Div., Salisbury, NC:

February 22, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00884; Price Pfister,

Pacoima, CA: February 29, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00888; W.R. Grace &

Co.—Conn., Grace Construction

Products, New Castle, PA: March 6,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00889; Sun Belt Fixtures,

Inc., El Paso, TX: March 6, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00900; Reynolds Metal

Co., Louisville, KY: March 13, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00823; Hasbro

Manufacturing Services, El Paso,

TX: February 1, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00928; United

Technologies Automotive Wiring

Systems Div., Plymouth, IN: March

22, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00880; Weyerhauser Co.,

Green Mountain Longview Lumber

Unit, Longview, WA: March 1, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00956; Lindal Cedar

Homes, Inc., Kent, WA: March 5,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00882; Elco Corp.,

Huntingdon, PA: March 4, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00897; Stapleton

Garment Co., (Knight Industries),

Stapleton, GA: March 11, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00903; United

Technologies Automotive, Input

Controls Div., St. Matthews, SC:

March 14, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–00908; UGG Holdings,

Inc., Original American UHGS Co.,

Portland, OR: February 27, 1995.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of April 1996.

Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC 20210 during normal business hours

or will be mailed to persons who write

to the above address.

Dated: April 26, 1996.

Russell Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy and

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96–12295 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M
24816 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 96 / Thursday, May 16, 1996 / Notices

[TA–W–31, 500 & 500B]

Andover Togs, Incorporated, South

Boston, Virginia and New York, New

York; Amended Certification

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

October 18, 1995, applicable to all

workers of Andover Togs, Incorporated

located in South Boston, Virginia. The

notice was published in the Federal

Register on November 9, 1995 (60 FR

56619).

At the request of petitioners, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. New

information provided by the company

shows that worker separations have

occurred at the subject firms’ New York

City location. The workers provide

administrative and support services for

the Andover Togs children’s apparel

production facilities.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers of

the subject firm who were adversely

affected by increased imports of apparel.

Accordingly, the Department is

amending the certification to cover the

workers of Andover Togs, Incorporated,

New York, New York.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–31,500 is hereby issued as

follows:

All workers of Andover Togs, Incorporated,

South Boston, Virginia (TA–W–31,500), and

New York, New York (TA–W–31,500B)

engaged in employment related to the

production of children’s apparel who became

totally or partially separated from

employment on or after September 15, 1994

are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 1st day of

May 1996.

Russell T. Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy and

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96–12294 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–31,844]

The Ertl Company, Dyersville, Iowa,

Including Leased Workers of Employee

Dynamics Inc., Dubuque, Iowa;

Amended Certification Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

February 26, 1996, applicable to all

workers at The Ertl Company located in

Dyersville, Iowa. The notice was

published in the Federal Register on

March 19, 1996 (61 FR 11224).

At the request of petitioners, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. Based on

new findings, the Department is

amending the certification to include

leased workers from Employee

Dynamics Inc., Dubuque, Iowa engaged

in the production of toy products for the

subject firm.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers of

The Ertl Company adversely affected by

imports.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–31,844 is hereby issued as

follows:

All workers of the Ertl Company,

Dyersville, Iowa, and workers of Employee

Dynamics Inc., Dubuque, Iowa, engaged in

the production of toy products for The Ertl

Company, who became totally or partially

separated from employment on or after

January 12, 1995 are eligible to apply for

adjustment assistance under Section 223 of

the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 1st day of

May 1996.

Russell T. Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy and

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96–12293 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–29,743 & 743G]

IBM Corporation, Enterprise Systems,

Large Scale Computing Systems

Division and its Successors,

Poughkeepsie, New York and

Integrated Systems Solutions

Corporation (ISSC), Division #07

(Formerly Division #26), Wappingers

Falls, New York; Amended Certification

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance

On March 23, 1995, the Department of

Labor issued a Notice of Revised

Determination on Reconsideration,

applicable to all workers at IBM

Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York.

The notice was published in the Federal

Register on April 5, 1995 (60 FR 17371).

The certification was subsequently

amended to include other locations and

divisions of the subject firm. The

amended notices were published in the

Federal Register on June 29, 1995 (60

FR 33850), and December 15, 1995 (60

FR 64454).

At the request of the State Agency, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. New

findings show that workers of the

Wappingers Falls, New York location of

Integrated Systems Solutions

Corporation (ISSC), Division #07

(formerly Division #26), provided

support services to IBM Corporation,

Enterprise Systems, Large Scale

Computing Systems Division. ISSC is a

separate corporate entity wholly owned

by IBM.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers of

the subject firm who are adversely

affected by increased imports.

Accordingly, the Department is again

amending the certification to include

the workers of ISSC, Division #07

(formerly Division #26), who provided

support services to IBM.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–29,743 is hereby issued as

follows:

All workers of Enterprise Systems, Large

Scale Computing Systems Division, and its

successors, of IBM Corporation located in

Poughkeepsie, New York (TA–W–29,743),

and workers of Integrated Systems Solutions

Corporation (ISSC), Division #07 (formerly

Division #26), Wappingers Falls, New York

providing support services to IBM

Corporation, the Enterprise Systems, Large

Scale Computing Systems Division, and its

successors who became totally or partially

separated from employment on or after

March 23, 1993, are eligible to apply for

adjustment assistance under Section 223 of

the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 29th day

of April 1996.

Russell T. Kile,

Acting Program Manager, Policy and

Reemployment Services, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 96–12286 Filed 5–15–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–31, 798]

Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee

Brewery, Milwaukee, Wisconsin;

Notice of Affirmative Determination

Regarding Application for

Reconsideration

By letter of March 28, 1996, the

petitioners, Brewery Workers Local 9,

UAW (Amalgamated) AFL–CIO,

requested administrative

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s Notice of Negative

Determination Regarding Eligibility to

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance for workers of the subject

firm. The denial notice was signed on

February 27, 1996, and published in the

Federal Register on March 19, 1996 (61

FR 11224).