alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | the      Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December      31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |               |                         |   |
|--------------------------------|--------------------|------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March      11, 2010 | By:                | /s/      ROBERT P. LOCASCIO  |   |
|                           | Name:         | Robert      P. LoCascio      |   |
|                           | Title:        | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12541]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

[General Counsel Designation No. 220]


Appointment of Members to the Legal Division Performance Review 
Board

    Under the authority granted to me as General Counsel of the 
Department of the Treasury by 31 U.S.C. 301 and 26 U.S.C. 7801, 
Treasury Department Order No. 101-5 (Revised), and pursuant to the 
Civil Service Reform Act, I hereby appoint the following persons to the 
Legal Division Performance Review Board:

(1) For the General Counsel Panel--
    Neal S. Wolin, Deputy General Counsel, who shall serve as 
Chairperson;
    Russell L. Munk, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs);
    John E. Bowman, Assistant General Counsel (Banking and Finance);
    Robert M. McNamara, Jr., Assistant General Counsel (Enforcement);
    Kenneth R. Schmalzabach, Assistant General Counsel (General Law and 
Ethics); and
    Elizabeth B. Anderson, Chief Counsel, United States Customs 
Service.
(2) For the Internal Revenue Service Panel--
    Chairperson, Deputy Chief Counsel, IRS;
    Deputy General Counsel;
    Two Associate Chief Counsel, IRS; and
    Two Regional Counsel, IRS.

    I hereby delegate to the Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue 
Service the authority to make the appointments to the IRS Panel 
specified in this Designation and to make the publication of the IRS 
Panel as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: May 13, 1996.
Edward S. Knight,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-12541 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
EXHIBIT
32.1.


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I,
Anthony Escobar, Chief Executive Officer, and Anthony Coletti, Principal
Accounting Officer, of Trafalgar Resources, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based
upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2009
of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:  August
10,
2009                                                                           By:  /s/ Anthony
Escobar


Anthony Escobar


Chief Executive
Officer





By:  /s/  Anthony
Coletti


Anthony Coletti, Principal Accounting
Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Trafalgar Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Trafalgar
Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 10.1


    Exhibit
      Index

    


    $120,000,000
      Credit Facility Commitment Letter, dated November 3, 2006 from JPMorgan Chase
      Bank, N.A. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.

     

    EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    ADDITIONAL
      EXHIBITS

    


    Credit
      Facility Commitment Letter

     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        -
          3
          -
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11358]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Meeting of the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development 
Council

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development 
Council on June 3-4, 1996. The meeting will be held in Building 31, 
Conference Room 10, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 
The meeting of the Subcommittee on Planning will be open on June 3. The 
Subcommittee meeting will held in Building 31, Room 2A03, from 8:00 
a.m. to 10:00 a.m. to discuss program plans and the agenda for the next 
Council meeting. Attendance by the public will be limited to space 
available.
    The Council meeting will be open to the public on June 3 from 10:00 
a.m. until 5:00 p.m. The agenda includes a report by the Director, 
NICHD, a report by the Human Learning and Behavior Branch, and a 
presentation on the Interactive Research Project Grants Mechanism. The 
meeting will be open on June 4 upon completion of applications at 
approximately 12:30 p.m. to adjournment if any policy issues are raised 
which need further discussion.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552(c)(4), 
and 552(c)(6), Title 5, United States Code and section 10(d) of Public 
Law 92-463, the meeting of the full Council will be closed to the 
public on June 4 from 8:00 a.m. to approximately 12:30 p.m. for the 
review, discussion, and evaluation of individual grant applications. 
These applications and the discussion could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Ms. Mary Plummer, Executive Secretary, NICHD, 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 5E03, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892-7510, Area Code 301, 496-1485, will provide a summary of the 
meeting and a roster of Council members as well as substantive program 
information. Individuals who plan to attend the open session and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Plummer.

    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research, and 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated May 1, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-11358 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3289

___________

Dale Eugene Schlichting, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 20, 2009

Filed: December 7, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal prisoner Dale Eugene Schlichting appeals the district court’s1

 order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his sentences for mail fraud and

engaging in monetary transactions in criminally derived property. The district court

granted a certificate of appealability on Schlichting’s claim that counsel was

ineffective at sentencing for failing to challenge enhancements under U.S.S.G. §

2B1.1(b)(1)(I) (loss between $1 million and $2.5 million), § 2B1.1(b)(8)(C) (violation
-2-

of prior administrative order or decree), § 3A1.1(b) (vulnerable victim), and § 3B1.3

(abuse of position of trust). Schlichting, however, stipulated to these enhancements

in his plea agreement and at his plea hearing. See United States v. His Law, 85 F.3d

379, 379 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (defendant is bound by promise made in plea

agreement). Schlichting does not assert ineffective assistance with respect to the plea

agreement, and he expressed satisfaction with his plea attorney’s representation at the

plea hearing. Having carefully reviewed the record, the briefs, and the applicable law,

we conclude that Schlichting cannot show that sentencing counsel acted unreasonably

in abiding by the plea agreement’s terms or that he was prejudiced by counsel’s failure

to challenge the agreed-upon enhancements. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S.

668, 687-88 (1984) (ineffective assistance standard); United States v. Davis, 406 F.3d

505, 508 (8th Cir. 2005) (we review ineffective assistance claims de novo).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
#### James T. HARRIS, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 95-SC-404-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

April 25, 1996.

*ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW*

James T. Harris was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year by Order of this Court entered on April 21, 1994. *Kentucky Bar Association v. Harris,*Ky., 875 S.W.2d 97 (1994). Harris filed an application for reinstatement to the practice of law in this Commonwealth pursuant to *531SCR 3.510 and complied with the requirements of the rules pertaining to reinstatement.

The Inquiry Tribunal of the Kentucky Bar Association recommended that the application for reinstatement be granted. We concur with the recommendation of the Tribunal.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that James T. Harris be and is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this Commonwealth on condition of the payment of any costs incurred by the Character and Fitness Committee’s investigation.

All concur, except BAKER, J., not sitting.

ENTERED: April 25, 1996.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice
NO. 07-02-0050-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 8, 2002

______________________________

RAYNALDO MEDELLIN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 44,287-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Raynaldo Medellin appeals from his conviction for delivery of a controlled

substance. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. 

Appellant has filed a “Notice of Appeal and Request for Court’s Permission to

Appeal” from his judgment of conviction dated December 10, 2001, in Cause No. 44,287-B

in the 181st District Court of Potter County for delivery of a controlled substance. Neither

a clerk’s record nor a reporter’s record has been filed in connection with the appeal. 
1A rule of appellate procedure will be referred to as “TRAP_” hereafter.

2

In his notice of appeal, appellant asserts that his conviction was pursuant to a plea

bargain and that the punishment assessed by the trial court was in accordance with the

plea bargain. Appellant does not allege that (1) his appeal is based on a jurisdictional

defect, (2) the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion ruled on before trial

or (3) the trial court granted permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(b)(3). He

asserts only that he is “requesting that the [trial] court grant permission to Defendant to

pursue his appeal.” 

A threshold question in any case is whether the court has jurisdiction over the

pending controversy. See State v. Roberts, 940 S.W.2d 655, 657 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).

Courts will address the question of jurisdiction sua sponte; for, unless a court has

jurisdiction over a matter, its actions in the matter are without validity. Id. at 657 n.2. 

Appellate jurisdiction is invoked by giving timely and proper notice of appeal. See

State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). To perfect appeal from a

judgment which was rendered on the defendant’s plea of guilty or nolo contendere under

Code of Criminal Procedure article 1.15, and in which the punishment assessed did not

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant,

the notice of appeal must (a) specify that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect; (b)

specify that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before

trial; or (c) state that the trial court granted permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(b)(3);1 White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 428 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Dismissal of an
3

issue or the entire matter is appropriate unless the form of the notice of appeal is proper

to perfect appeal as to the issue or matter. Id. 

Appellant’s Notice of Appeal does not contain any of the three allegations

necessary to invoke our appellate jurisdiction over an appeal from his conviction. See

TRAP 25.2(b)(3); White, 61 S.W.3d at 428. Accordingly, our jurisdiction has not been

invoked and we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5725 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the halt in pension 

payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. GOLDEN of Maine, Mr. 

DONALDS, and Mr. MCCORMICK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 

the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the 

halt in pension payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Congressionally 

5 Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To Incar6 cerated Officials Now Act’’ or the ‘‘No CORRUPTION 

7 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5725 IH

1 SEC. 2. FORFEITURE OF PENSION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8332(o) of title 5, United 

3 States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), and 

5 (6) as paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively; 

6 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an individual 

9 convicted of an offense described in paragraph (2) shall 

10 not be eligible to receive any payment of an annuity pursu11 ant to the retirement system under this subchapter or 

12 chapter 84, except that this sentence applies only to such 

13 payments based on service rendered as a Member (irre14 spective of when rendered). 

15 ‘‘(B) If the conviction of an individual described in 

16 subparagraph (A) is overturned on appeal by a court of 

17 competent jurisdiction, the individual shall receive pay18 ments that the individual would have received but for the 

19 application of subparagraph (A). 

20 ‘‘(C) This paragraph applies only to a conviction that 

21 occurs after the date of enactment of the No Congression22 ally Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To 

23 Incarcerated Officials Now Act.’’; 

24 (3) in paragraph (5)(B)(i), as so redesignated, 

25 by striking ‘‘paragraph (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘para26 graph (6)’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5725 IH

1 (4) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated, by 

2 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘para3 graph (5)(B)’’. 

4 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

5 Section 719(e)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘section 8332(o)(5)’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘section 8332(o)(6)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 7, 2008



By:

/s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. StockwellTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12210]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 184; Minimum Performance and 
Installation Standards for Runway Guard Lights

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
Special Committee 184 meeting to be held June 4, 1996, starting at 9:30 
a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., 
Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows: (1) Administrative Announcements; 
(2) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; (3) Review and Approval of Meeting 
Agenda; (4) Review and Approval of Minutes of the Previous Meeting; (5) 
Review Comments Received from Proposed Final Draft; (6) Complete 
Editorial and Comment Cleanup on Proposed Final Draft; (7) Other 
Business; (8) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-12210 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20949 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LORETO BARRERA-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-457-15

-------------------- July 13, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Loreto Barrera-Rojas has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Barrera was provided a copy of counsel’s Anders motion and brief but has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief reveals no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 00-20949 -2- excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harvey Lalach, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anavex Life Sciences
      Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | information contained in the quarterly report on Form
      10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Anavex Life Sciences
Corp.                               

Date: May 20, 2009

|/s/ Harvey
      Lalach                                                                           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Harvey Lalach                                                                                     | 
|President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Director                                 
|(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
      Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Anavex Life
Sciences Corp. and will be retained by Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROMAN WHITE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-607

[January 21, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562014CF003429A.

Roman White, Vero Beach, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A. Warner, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.