alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer of Micro Laboratories, Inc.
(the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the best
of my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-KSB
of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2003

/s/Robert Thistle
Robert Thistle,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Financial Officer of Micro Laboratories, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, that to the best
of my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-KSB
of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2003

 /s/Mary Nelson
Mary Nelson,
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Harvey Lalach, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Thrifty Printing Inc.
2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
date a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;
4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(c)	disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the small business issuer's most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuer's control over financial
reporting.
5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the small business issuer's internal controls and
procedures for financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2006

Signature:  /S/ Harvey Lalach
Title:	  Harvey Lalach, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Eric BEISHLINE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 67804.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.

Nov. 21, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 17, 1996.

Kathleen G. Henry, Green, Hennings & Henry, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General and Cheryl A. Caponegro, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and AHRENS and RHODES, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1214]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board <SUP>1

    \1\  The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-88, 109 Stat. 
803 (the Act), which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and took 
effect on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce 
Commission (ICC) and transferred certain functions and proceedings 
to the Surface Transportation Board (Board). Section 204(b)(1) of 
the Act provides, in general, that proceedings pending before the 
ICC on the effective date of that legislation shall be decided under 
the law in effect prior to January 1, 1996, insofar as they involve 
functions retained by the Act. This notice relates to a proceeding 
that was pending with the ICC prior to January 1, 1996, and to 
functions that are subject to Board jurisdiction pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. 10901. Therefore, this notice applies the law in effect prior 
to the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Finance Docket No. 32793]


Naugatuck Railroad Company, Inc.; Operation Exemption; The State 
of Connecticut

    Naugatuck Railroad Company, Inc. (NAUG), has filed a notice of 
exemption to operate 19.6 miles of rail line owned by the State of 
Connecticut (Connecticut) from Waterbury, CT, at NAUG milepost 0.0, an 
interchange point with Springfield Terminal Railway Company (ST), to 
Torrington, CT, at NAUG milepost 19.6, the end of the track. NAUG will 
replace ST, which has been operating the line, and will become a class 
III rail carrier. The parties expected to consummate the proposed 
transaction on December 29, 1995, the effective date of the exemption.
    Any comments must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 
1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20423 and served on: 
Walter A. Stapleton, Naugatuck Railroad Company, Inc., 143A Green 
Mountain Road, Claremont, NH 03743.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.31. If the notice contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) (formerly 
10505(d)) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke 
will not automatically stay the transaction.

    Decided: January 19, 1996.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1214 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12215]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection 
Request

    Normally on Fridays, the Social Security Administration publishes a 
list of information collection packages that will require submission to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance in compliance 
with P.L. 104-13 effective October 1, 1995, The Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995. Since the last list was published in the Federal Register on 
May 8, 1996, the information collections listed below have been 
proposed or will require extension of the current OMB approvals:

(Call the SSA Reports Clearance Officer on (410) 965-4123 for a copy of 
the form(s) or package(s), or write to her at the address listed below 
the information collections.)

    1. Report(s) of Student Beneficiary at End of School Year--0960-
0089. The information collected on form SSA-1388 is used by the Social 
Security Administration to verify a student's full-time attendance at 
an approved educational institution. The affected public consists of 
claimants or beneficiaries who are students and are requested to 
provide this information.
    Number of Respondents: 200,000.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 33,333 hours.

    2. Work History Report--0960-0552. The information collected on 
form SSA-3369 is used to document a claimant's work history and used, 
in conjunction with other evidence, to determine eligibility for 
disability benefits. The respondents are claimant's for disability 
benefits.
    Number of Respondents: 2,000,000.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 1,000,000 hours.
    Written comments and recommendations regarding these information 
collections should be sent within 60 days from the date of this 
publication, directly to the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at the 
following address: Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: 
Charlotte S. Whitenight, 6401 Security Blvd., 1-A-21 Operations Bldg., 
Baltimore, MD 21235.
    In addition to your comments on the accuracy of the agency's burden 
estimate, we are soliciting comments on the need for the information; 
its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility and 
clarity; and on ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the 
use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Charlotte Whitenight,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-12215 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 269 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 269

       Supporting the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

  Ms. Giffords (for herself and Mr. Burgess) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Supporting the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month.

Whereas approximately 7,000,000 motorcyclists ride on our Nation's roads and 
        highways to commute, travel, and recreate;
Whereas motorcycles are a valuable component of the transportation mix;
Whereas motorcycles are fuel-efficient and decrease congestion while having 
        little impact on our Nation's transportation infrastructure;
Whereas the United States is the world leader in motorcycle safety, promoting 
        education, licensing, use of protective gear, and motorcycle awareness;
Whereas the motorcycling community is committed to decreasing motorcycle crashes 
        through licensing, training, education, enforcement, personal 
        responsibility, and increased public awareness;
Whereas, according to a comprehensive study conducted on motorcycle crash 
        causation in the United States the ``Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors 
        and Identification of Countermeasures'' (Hurt Report), in approximately 
        two-thirds of fatal car-motorcycle crashes, the driver of the car was at 
        fault;
Whereas motorcycle awareness is beneficial to all road users and will help to 
        decrease car-motorcycle crashes;
Whereas May is designated as ``Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month''; and
Whereas National Highway Traffic Safety Administration promotes Motorcycle 
        Safety Awareness Month to encourage riders to always wear helmets and 
        other protective gear, never drink and ride, be properly licensed, and 
        get training and to remind all riders and motorists to always share the 
        road: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the contribution motorcycles make to the 
        transportation mix;
            (2) encourages all road users to be more aware of 
        motorcycles and motorcyclists' safety;
            (3) encourages all riders to receive appropriate training 
        and practice safe riding skills; and
            (4) supports the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**NSB HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**For the Six months Ended June 30,2005**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of NSB Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A.Stevens, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)        Tothe best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        Tothe best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Mark A. Stevens                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark A. Stevens                        |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Form of Amendments to 1999 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan




 8 
  

 Exhibit 10.4. 1999 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan 
 Section 2 – Certain Definitions of the 1999 Non- Employee Directors Stock Option Plan was amended to read as follows:

 “Fair Market Value: means, for any given date, the closing market price for a share of Company Stock as a Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
security reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Automated Quotation System (“Nasdaq”) for that date (or, if no such prices are so reported for such date, for the latest preceding date on which such sale prices
were so reported). If the Fair Market Value for a given date cannot be determined by reference to Nasdaq, it shall be determined in good faith by the Committee.” 
 Section 7 – Adjustments of the 1999 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan was amended to read as follows: 
 SECTION 7 – Adjustments 
 In the event of
a reorganization or recapitalization, merger, consolidation or similar transaction involving the Company, a stock-on-stock dividend or split, spin-off, reverse split or combination of the Company’s Class A common stock, a rights offering,
or any other change in the corporate or capital structure of the Company affecting the Class A common stock, the Board shall make proportionate adjustments to the number and kind of shares which thereafter may be made subject to Options and in
the numbers and kind of shares covered by outstanding Options and the per share exercise price of such Options. In the event of a merger, consolidation, or combination in which the consideration issued with respect to Shares is a combination of
different types of property, the Board may designate the property or combination of property to be received upon the exercise of each such outstanding Option.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

 No stipulation to dismiss having been filed, in accordance with the Court’s March 

1, 2018 Order (Doc. 25), 

IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. 

 Dated this 4th day of April, 2018.

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

Janine Hanson, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Northland Group, LLC, 

Defendant. 

 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-17-08225-PCT-SPL

ORDER 

Case 3:17-cv-08225-SPL Document 26 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kenneth WILSON, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 62768.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 26, 1993.

John A. Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, for possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1992. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

s0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148148

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148148

COA: 313909

Oakland CC: 2009

- 227690

- FH

DON EMANUEL HAIRSTON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8

, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David Tousley, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anavex Life Sciences
      Corp. for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | information contained in the quarterly report on Form
      10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Anavex Life Sciences
Corp.                                  

Date: February 14, 2011

|/s/ David Tousley                                                    | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|David Tousley                                                        | 
|Chief Financial Officer and Director                                 | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer) | 

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERTO ANTONIO HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

PRESTON BROWN, VALENTINA 

SAMANIEGO, ODD COUPLES 

PROPERTIES, LLC, CURSADERS 

REALTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, and 

ENTRUST CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00351-CV

Appeal from the

205th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2022DCV1929)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this 

appeal and that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 23.2CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-112696) and Form S-8 (No. 333-102833,No. 333-46162, No. 333-100122, No. 333-119025, No.333-70124 and No. 333-140524) of Moldflow Corporation of our report dated September 13, 2005 relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule, before the effects of the adjustments toretrospectively reflect the discontinued operations described in Note 3 to the consolidatedfinancial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBoston,Massachusetts