alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rolf G. Horchler, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and President of Triton Resources, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         

| | By:    | /s/ Rolf G. Horchler                                                
| | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                                     
| | Name:  | ROLF G. HORCHLER                                                    
| |        |                                                                     
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer and President
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer) 
| |        |                                                                     
| | Date:  | September 14, 2006                                                  



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Thomas A. Zlaket, SBA # 001819

THOMAS A. ZLAKET, P.L.L.C.

310 South Williams Boulevard, Suite 170

Tucson, Arizona 85711-4446

Phone: (520) 750-0250

Fax: (520) 750-0243

Email: tom@zlaketlaw.com

Attorney for Nonparty Movants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

WYO TECH Investment Group, LLC; CWT 

Canada II Limited Partnership; Resources 

Recovery Corporation; and Jean Noelting,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:17-CV-04140-DWL

 NOTICE OF ERRATA RE:

 MOTION TO QUASH

Nonparty Movants hereby submit this Notice of Errata to correct the inadvertent omission 

of Exhibits A and B, referred to the Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed on or about August 22, 

2019 (Document 204-2). In addition, that Motion inadvertently omitted as Exhibit C an exemplar 

of the issued subpoenas requiring the production of documents by each of the Nonparty Movants. 

The subpoenas sought to be quashed are identical in substance. Exhibits A, B, and C are attached 

hereto. 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 221 Filed 09/05/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 5th day of September, 2019.

Thomas A. Zlaket, P.L.L.C.

By: /s/ Thomas A. Zlaket

Attorney for NonParty Movants

ORIGINAL electronically filed September 5, 2019.

COPY served via CM/ECF System, 

which sends notification to all parties 

registered therein this 5th day of 

September, 2019.

 /s/ Carol L. Davis

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 221 Filed 09/05/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Financial Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
      Jerald L. Fenstermaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      and J. Kevin Maxwell, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.





/s/
                Jerald L. FenstermakerJerald
                L. FenstermakerPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)August
                11, 2008





/s/
                J. Kevin MaxwellJ.
                Kevin MaxwellTreasurer
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)August
                11, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25216-25217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12620]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EL96-48-000]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric 
Company, and Southern California Edison Co.; Notice of Filing

May 14, 1996.
    Take notice that Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & 
Electric Company, and Southern California Edison Company (``the 
Companies''), on April 29, 1996, tendered for filing a Petition for a 
Declaratory Order. This petition requests that the Commission confirm 
the delineation of certain facilities as ``local distribution'' 
(subject to state regulation) and certain other facilities as 
``transmission'' (subject to Commission jurisdiction) based upon their 
existing uses.
    In addition, the application sets forth recommended time frames for 
actions by the Companies, the Commission, and the participants in this 
proceeding. The Commission invites comments on these procedural 
proposals in addition to comments on the substantive proposals.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such application 
should file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211. All petitions or 
protests should be filed on or before June 13, 1996. Protests will be 
considered by the

[[Page 25217]]

Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of 
this application are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12620 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6430** 

ADARIUS QUANTE DENNIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN CARTLEDGE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 0:14

- cv - 04637

- TMC )

Submitted : September 20, 2016 Decided: September 23, 2016

Before KING, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Adarius Quante Dennis, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PE R CURIAM: Adarius Quante Dennis seeks to appeal the district court ’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We order a limited remand. “[T]he timely filing of a notice of ap peal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). The district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if “a party so moves no later than 30 days after the time prescribed by . . . Rule 4(a) expires,” and the party shows excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). The district court’s order was e ntered on February 2, 2016. Dennis had until March 3, 2016 to timely file his notice of appeal, and the 30

- day excusable neglect period ended on April 4, 2016. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). Dennis’ notice of appeal was filed within the 30

- day excusable neglect period. He stated reasons for his delay and arguably requested an extension of the period to file the notice of appeal. Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court for the limited p urpose of allowing the court to determi ne whether3 an extension is warranted. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11750]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[RI 30-9]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Reclearance of 
Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for reclearance of the following information 
collection. RI 30-9, Reinstatement of Disability Annuity Previously 
Terminated Because of Restoration to Earning Capacity, informs 
disability annuitants of their right to request restoration under title 
5, U.S.C., Section 8337. It also specifies the conditions to be met and 
the documentation required for a person to request reinstatement.
    Approximately 200 forms are completed annually. The form takes 
approximately 60 minutes to respond, including a medical examination. 
The annual estimated burden is 200 hours. Burden may vary depending on 
the time required for a medical examination.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f7572797e6d6d70715f727e767331706f7231787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a30373c3b282835341a373b333674352a37743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 
9, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349, 
Washington, DC 20415.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT:
Mary Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 96-11750 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 337 

Supporting the observance of National Child Abuse Prevention Month, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Ms. GRANGER (for herself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. 

COURTNEY, and Mr. MCDERMOTT) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the observance of National Child Abuse 

Prevention Month, and for other purposes. 

Whereas, according the most recent annual estimates, State 

and local child protective services investigated nearly 

5,800,000 children in the United States who were reported to be abused or neglected in 2007; 

Whereas, according the most recent annual estimates, 1,760 

children died in the United States in 2007 from abuse 

and neglect; 

Whereas, according the most recent annual estimates, 

794,000 children in the United States were confirmed by 

protective services as being victims of child maltreatment 

in 2007; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 337 IH 

Whereas 59 percent of the children were classified as victims 

of child neglect; 

Whereas 4.2 percent of the children were classified as victims 

of psychological maltreatment; 

Whereas 7.6 percent of the children were classified as victims 

of sexual abuse; 

Whereas 10.8 percent of the children were classified as victims of physical abuse; 

Whereas 1 percent of the children were classified as victims 

of medical maltreatment; 

Whereas 13.1 percent of the children were classified as victims of multiple maltreatments; 

Whereas more than three-quarters of the children who died 

due to child abuse and neglect were younger than four 

years old; 

Whereas these figures represent only reported cases of abuse, 

many cases are not reported to police or social services; 

Whereas child abuse and neglect have great long-term costs 

for children, families, and society which timely and effective community-based prevention services can reduce, improving the lives and prospects of thousands of children 

and families; and 

Whereas observing National Child Abuse Prevention Month 

during the month of April provides a special opportunity 

to raise awareness about the serious threat that child 

abuse and neglect poses to our Nation’s children: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 337 IH 

1 (1) supports the observance of National Child 

2 Abuse Prevention Month in order to increase aware3 ness of child maltreatment and encourage individ4 uals and communities to support children and fami5 lies; 

6 (2) recognizes and applauds the national and 

7 community organizations for their work in pro8 moting awareness about child maltreatment includ9 ing identifying risk factors and developing preven10 tion strategies; and 

11 (3) urges families and individuals to report 

12 abuse or get help by calling the National Child 

13 Abuse Hotline at 1–800–4–A–Child (1–800–422– 

14 4453). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Sinisa Djurdjic,

Defendants.

No. CR-17-01658-JGZ (DTF)

ORDER 

Counsel for Defendant, having filed a motion to Designate Case Complex, there 

being no objection by the Government, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and 

LRCrim 16.2 the Motion (Doc. 21) is granted. This matter is hereby designated a 

complex case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court authorizes submission of interim 

vouchers for payment of counsel fees in no less than three-month increments.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel must submit a CJA-26, along 

with the District of Arizona’s Confidential Ex Parte Attachment to CJA 26, before 

submitting any voucher in excess of the CJA statutory maximum.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 4:17-cr-01658-JGZ-DTF Document 24 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the Guide to Judiciary Policy and 

Procedure, Vol. 7, § 230.26.10, which recommends budgeting individual representations 

that may exceed 300 attorney hours or $42,000 in total costs (attorney fees plus ancillary 

services costs), any CJA counsel who anticipates exceeding these budgeting thresholds 

must contact Ninth Circuit Case Managing Attorney Kristine Fox to prepare a proposed 

litigation budget for court review. Counsel may reach Ms. Fox at kfox@ce9.uscourts.gov

or at (415) 355-8985.

The next status conference is affirmed for October 16, 2018 at 11:40 AM.

Dated this 19th day of July, 2018.

Case 4:17-cr-01658-JGZ-DTF Document 24 Filed 07/19/18 Page 2 of 2
#### MERCANTILE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, NA, d/b/a Mercantile Bank of KC, respondent, v. Byron BRANTLEY and Joyce Brantley, appellants.

No. WD 50199.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 27, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 1, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.

Stephen Small, Kansas City, for appellants.

Michael Berman, Daniel Rabin, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joyce Hughes1 appeals the circuit court’s summary judgment in favor of Mercantile Bank of Kansas City in the bank’s lawsuit against her and her former husband, Byron Brantley, for nonpayment of a note. Hughes did not respond to the motion for summary judgment. We affirm. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. When she signed a note to borrow money from Mercantile Bank, she was married to Byron Brantley and signed as Joyce Brantley. The cou-pie later divorced, and she has resumed using her maiden name of Hughes.
H. Res. 23 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 7, 2009. 

Resolved, That at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, January 20, 

2009, the House shall proceed to the West Front of the Capitol for the purpose of attending the inaugural ceremonies of 

the President and Vice President of the United States; and 

that upon the conclusion of the ceremonies the House stands 

adjourned until 10 a.m. on Wednesday, January 21, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 1996 / Notices 24531

Estimated Time per Respondent: 8hr.

54 min.

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 8,528,697.

Request for Comments: Comments

submitted in response to this notice will

be summarized and/or included in the

request for OMB approval. All

comments will become a matter of

public record.

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the collection of information is

necessary for the proper performance of

the functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

collection of information; (c) ways to

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity

of the information to be collected; and

(d) ways to minimize the burden of the

collection of information on

respondents, including through the use

of automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

Approved: May 8, 1996.

Garrick R. Shear,

IRS Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–12204 Filed 5–14–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U

Office of the Comptroller of the

Currency

[Docket No. 96–12]

Order of Succession

By virtue of the authority contained in

12 U.S.C. 4, it is ordered as follows:

During a vacancy in the Office of the

Comptroller of the Currency or during

any period in which the Comptroller of

the Currency is unable to perform the

duties of such office due to absence or

disability, the following officials—each

of whom has received appointment

under 12 U.S.C. 4 as a Deputy

Comptroller of the Currency—shall

possess the power and perform the

duties attached by law to the Office of

the Comptroller of the Currency in the

order of succession enumerated:

1. Konrad S. Alt, Senior Deputy

Comptroller for Economic Analysis and

Public Affairs;

2. Julie L. Williams, Chief Counsel;

3. Susan F. Krause, Senior Deputy

Comptroller for Bank Supervision

Policy;

4. Leann G. Britton, Senior Deputy

Comptroller for Bank Supervision

Operations.

Dated: May 7, 1996.

Eugene A. Ludwig,

Comptroller of the Currency.

[FR Doc. 96–12208 Filed 5–14–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–33–P

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC–31; OTS Nos. H–2678 and 00423]

Kenwood Federal M.H.C., Cincinnati,

Ohio; Approval of Conversion

Application

Notice is hereby given that on April

30, 1996, the Director, Corporate

Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision,

or her designee, acting pursuant to

delegated authority, approved the

application of Kenwood Federal M.H.C.,

Cincinnati, Ohio, to convert to the stock

form of organization. Copies of the

application are available for inspection

at the Dissemination Branch, Office of

Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Central

Regional Office, Office of Thrift

Supervision, 200 West Madison Street,

Suite 1300, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

Dated: May 9, 1996.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Nadine Y. Washington,

Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12127 Filed 5–14–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720–01–P