alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5447 

To prohibit any transactions using Alipay in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. OGLES (for himself, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, and Mr. TIFFANY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit any transactions using Alipay in the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Alipay Act of 

5 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ALIPAY. 

7 No financial transactions between AliPay (China) 

8 Internet Technology Company Limited (referred to in this 

9 Act as ‘‘AliPay’’) and a United States person are per10 mitted, including the use of any application or payment 

11 processing services operated by Alipay. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5447 IH

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) The term ‘‘United States person’’ means— 

4 (A) a national of the United States; 

5 (B) an alien lawfully admitted for perma6 nent residence; 

7 (C) an entity organized under the laws of 

8 the United States or under the laws of any ju9 risdiction within the United States (including a 

10 foreign branch of such an entity); or 

11 (D) an individual who is physically present 

12 in the United States. 

13 (2) The term ‘‘financial transaction’’ means— 

14 (A) a transaction which in any way or de15 gree affects interstate or foreign commerce— 

16 (i) involving the movement of funds 

17 by wire or other means; or 

18 (ii) involving one or more monetary 

19 instruments; or 

20 (B) a transaction involving the use of a fi21 nancial institution which is engaged in, or the 

22 activities of which affect, interstate or foreign 

23 commerce in any way or degree. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5962 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5962

   To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ``Mount Blue Sky 
                 Wilderness'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2023

  Mr. Neguse (for himself and Ms. Pettersen) introduced the following 
                                  bill

                            October 25, 2023

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ``Mount Blue Sky 
                 Wilderness'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mount Blue Sky Wilderness Act''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE MOUNT EVANS WILDERNESS AS THE ``MOUNT BLUE 
              SKY WILDERNESS''.

    (a) Redesignation.--Section 102(a)(10) of Public Law 96-560 (16 
U.S.C. 1132 note; 94 Stat. 3267) is amended by striking ``as the Mount 
Evans Wilderness;'' and inserting ``as the `Mount Blue Sky 
Wilderness';''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Mount Evans 
Wilderness shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mount Blue Sky 
Wilderness''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 3.3

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

PROPEX FABRICS INC.

The undersigned,
Propex Fabrics Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), for the purpose of amending the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby make and
execute this Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and does hereby certify that:

FIRST: That on
May 24, 2006, the board of directors of the corporation adopted the following resolution, proposing and declaring advisable and in the best interest of the corporation the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation set
forth in such resolution, and directed that the same be submitted to a vote of the sole stockholder of the corporation:

RESOLVED, that the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be amended by deleting Article I in its entirety and substituting the following therefor:

ARTICLE I

The name of the corporation is Propex Inc.

SECOND: That in lieu of a meeting and vote of the sole stockholder, the holder of all of the stock of the corporation entitled to vote on said amendment
has consented in writing to said amendment in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PROPEX FABRICS INC. has caused this certificate to be duly signed by a duly authorized officer this 13th day of June, 2006.



PROPEX FABRICS INC.By:

/s/ John StoverName:

John StoverTitle:

Vice President
Long Term Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATION 
 1999 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 This
Amendment Two is hereby made as of this 16th day of August, 2006, by Alabama National BanCorporation (the “Corporation”). 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation has heretofore established the Alabama National BanCorporation 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has the ability and the right to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 11 therein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as described below: 
 1. Section 4 of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the fourth paragraph thereof and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 
 “In the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend, or other change in corporate structure
affecting the Stock, a substitution or adjustment shall be made in the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan, in the number and option price of shares subject to outstanding Stock Options granted under the Plan and in the
number of shares subject to Restricted Stock awards granted under the Plan as determined to be equitable and proportionate by the Committee, provided that the number of shares subject to any award shall always be a whole number. Such adjusted option
price shall also be used to determine the amount payable by the Company upon the exercise of any Stock Appreciation Right associated with any Stock Option.” 
 2. All other terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan not herein modified shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment Two to be executed by its duly authorized officer. 
  

			
	ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard Murray IV

	Its:	 	President and Chief Operating Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.89

                                   ASSIGNMENT

     WHEREAS, Sedona Corporation (the "Assignor") is indebted to David R. Vey
(the "Assignee"), which debt (the "Debt") the Assignee has agreed to consolidate
and refinance (the "Refinancing"); and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Refinancing, the Assignor has agreed to assign to
the Assignee all of its right, title and interest in a certain account
receivable due to the Assignor from ACEncrypt (the "ACEncrypt Receivable"), with
an outstanding balance of FORTY THOUSAND and 00/100 Dollars ($40,000.00) (the
"Balance"); and

     WHEREAS, in exchange for the assignment of the ACEncrpty Receivable, the
Assignee has reduced the Debt by the Balance (the "Offset"); and

     WHEREAS, the Offset was applied to the Debt, prior to consolidation and
refinancing of the Debt into a promissory note dated October 23, 2006 in the
principal sum of ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY
TWO AND 81/100 Dollars ($1,213,952. 81) from the Assignor to the Assignee (the
"Note");

     NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

          1.   The Assignor hereby assigns, transfers and sets over unto the
               Assignee its, successors and assigns, all of its right, title and
               interest of every kind and nature whatsoever in and to the
               ACEncrypt Receivable.

          2.   The Assignor represents and warrants that: (i) it is the sole
               owner of the ACEncrypt Receivable; (ii) it has not assigned,
               sold, encumbered, pledged or otherwise transferred the ACEncrpty
               Receivable, except as otherwise provided herein; and (iii) this
               Assignment represents a conveyance of its entire interest in the
               ACEncrpty Receivable.

          3.   The Assignor agrees that it will execute any further consent,
               document or assurance to effect the assignment of the ACEncrpty
               Receivable.

          4.   The Assignee represents and warrants that the Balance has been
               applied to the reduction of the Debt prior to the issuance of the
               Note.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor and Assignee has executed this agreement
as of the date set forth herein.

Dated: as of October 23, 2006           Sedona Corporation


                                        By:
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Marco A. Emrich
                                        Title: President and CEO
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.89
                                    David Vey
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Graham Alexander, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of Rancho Santa Monica Developments, Inc. (the "Company"),hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge: 

(i) 

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the six months ending August 31st ,2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) 

theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

By: */s/ Graham G. Alexander*Name: Graham Alexander Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Date: December 9, 2009 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5969 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5969

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to revise certain 
 regulations to permit certain children to accompany their parents or 
   legal guardians through Global Entry airport lanes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Travel for Families Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF GLOBAL ENTRY TO CERTAIN CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall revise 
section 235.12 of title 8, Code of Federal Regulations, to permit a 
child who is 10 years old or younger who is not a member of Global 
Entry in accordance with such section and who is traveling with such 
child's parent or legal guardian who is a member of Global Entry in 
accordance with such section to accompany such parent or legal guardian 
through a Global Entry lane upon arrival at an international airport in 
the United States.
    (b) Appointments.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall take 
such actions as may be necessary to permit a parent or legal guardian 
of up to four children described in subsection (a) who is applying for 
membership in Global Entry on behalf of such children to schedule a 
single appointment for an interview relating to such membership for all 
such children.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5969

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to revise certain 
 regulations to permit certain children to accompany their parents or 
   legal guardians through Global Entry airport lanes, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
CAROLINA WATERWORKS, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

TAYLOR MADE GROUP, LLC, Defendant

- Appellee,

AND

TAYLOR MADE PRODUCTS
, Defendant.

______________________

2014

- 1362

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in No. 2:12

- cv

- 02568

- DCN, Judge David C. Norton

.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Carolina Waterworks, Inc. moves without opposition to withdraw its appeal. Case: 14-1362 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 08/06/2014CAROLINA WATERWORKS
, INC

. v. TAYLOR MADE GROUP
, LLC 2

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 6, 2014 Case: 14-1362 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 08/06/2014
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12126]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Proposed Collection: Comment Request

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is making 
efforts to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following proposed and/or continuing information collections, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are requested 
concerning: (a) whether the proposed or continuing collections of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether information shall have practical utility; 
(b) the accuracy of the burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.

DATES: Send comments on or before June 28, 1996.

ADDRESS INFORMATION TO: Mary Ann Ball, Bureau of Management, Office of 
Administrative Services, Information Support Services Division, U.S. 
Agency for International Development, B930 N.S., Washington, D.C. (202) 
736-4743 or via e-mail [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0017.
    Form Number: AID 1440-3.
    Title: Contractor's Certificate and Agreement with the U.S. Agency 
for International Development/Contractor's Invoice and Contract 
Abstract.
    Type of Submission: Renewal.
    Purpose; USAID finances host country contracts, for technical and 
professional services and for the construction of physical facilities, 
between the contractors for such services and entities in the country 
receiving assistance under loan or grant agreements with the recipient 
country. USAID is not a party to these contracts, and the contracts are 
not subject to the FAR. In its role as the financing agency, USAID 
needs some means of collecting information directly from the 
contractors supplying such services so that it may take appropriate 
action in the event that the contractor does not comply with applicable 
USAID regulations. The information collection, recordkeeping, and 
reporting requirements are necessary to assure that USAID funds are 
expended in accordance with statutory requirements and USAID policies.
    Annual Reporting Burden: Respondents: 30, Annual responses: 12, 
Average hours per response: .50, Total annual responses: 360.

    Dated: May 1, 1996.
Genease E. Pettigrew,
Chief, Information Support Services Division, Office of Administrative 
Services, Bureau of Management.
[FR Doc. 96-12126 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```
[Ernst & Young Letterhead]



EXHIBIT 10.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32818) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan of IFCO Systems N.V. of our report dated March 21, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IFCO Systems
N.V. included in (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



March 28, 2003



|Ernst & Young AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft |  |                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
|                                                
|By:                                              |  | /s/    THOMAS
SPANNAGL               |  | 
|                                                 |  | (Thomas Spannagl) (Wirschaftsprüfer) |  |
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Financial Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Mangiapane, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Joseph Mangiapane, Jr. |
|--------|----------------------------|

Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2008
#### In the Matter of Local Union No. 964, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Appellant, v Lighting Services, Inc., Respondent.

Mikoll, J.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Silbermann, J.H.O.), entered June 23, 1989 in Rockland County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5225 (b) to direct respondent to turn over $44,474 to petitioner.

Petitioner, as judgment creditor of Mericana Metal Structures, Inc. (hereinafter Mericana), the judgment debtor, commenced this special proceeding seeking a final judgment directing respondent to pay a sum sufficient to satisfy petitioner’s judgment against Mericana, but not in excess of the amount of said indebtedness. The indebtedness between respondent and Mericana arose out of a contract under which Mericana was to construct and renovate buildings owned by respondent. The contract price was $612,000. Payments were to be made in installments as the work progressed, with the final installment of the balance due under the contract to be paid "[o]n completion of entire work covered by this Contract and delivery of final certificate of occupancy”.

Respondent answered the petition, denying in effect that the contract work was completed by Mericana and, by way of *862affirmative defense, claimed that Mericana did not comply with all the terms of the contract and that respondent had claims against Mericana exceeding the amount claimed to be owing to Mericana. A hearing was held at which testimony was taken and evidence presented. Upon conclusion of the hearing, Supreme Court ruled that "the proof is insufficient to establish that there is an indebtedness due from [respondent] to Mericana” and dismissed the petition. This appeal ensued.

There should be an affirmance. The only issue raised on this appeal is whether Supreme Court properly allocated the burden of proof in making its decision. We conclude that the proof was insufficient to warrant judgment in favor of petitioner.

Petitioner, as judgment creditor, stood in the shoes of the judgment debtor (here Mericana) and was obliged to allege and prove that Mericana had fully performed all the work required under the terms of the contract *(see, Breffort v Kipness,*80 AD2d 528, 529). Delivery of the final certificate of occupancy did not establish that Mericana fully performed its obligation under the contract. Respondent offered evidence that work which should have been done by Mericana was performed by others, not done or done improperly.

Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of New Oriental Energy & Chemical Corp.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended June 30, 2007
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
      10-QSB"), I, Chen Si Qiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)  The
      Form
      10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                August 14, 2007
            
            /s/
                Chen Si QiangChen
                Si QiangChief
                Executive Officer