alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henry Lee BELK, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 16238.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

Dec. 4, 1989.

John A. Klosterman, Columbia, for mov-ant-appellant.

*697William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

HOGAN, Judge.

Movant Henry Lee Belk, to whom we shall refer as the defendant, was tried by a jury and convicted of two counts of rape in violation of § 566.030, RSMo 1978. His punishment was assessed at imprisonment for a term of 50 years on each count and it was ordered that the two sentences be served consecutively. On direct appeal the judgments of conviction were affirmed. *State v.*Belk, 632 S.W.2d 103 (Mo.App.1982). On July 11, 1988, the defendant filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. On January 20, 1989, the proceeding was dismissed on the ground that the motion was untimely filed. The defendant appeals on the same grounds argued and rejected in *Ritterbach v. State,*772 S.W.2d 4 (Mo.App.1989).

This court’s holding in *Ritterbach*is completely dispositive of the issues presented in this case and a reiteration of the law would have no precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed by memorandum pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

FLANIGAN, P.J., and PREWITT, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 399 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 399

  Honoring the sacrifice of members of the Armed Forces who are also 
  mothers and the support provided by mothers of members of the Armed 
 Forces and mothers who are the spouse of members of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2009

 Mr. Israel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the sacrifice of members of the Armed Forces who are also 
  mothers and the support provided by mothers of members of the Armed 
 Forces and mothers who are the spouse of members of the Armed Forces.

Whereas women comprise more than 15 percent of the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas almost 41 percent of the women serving in the Armed Forces have 
        children, and this statistic includes members who are single mothers and 
        mothers married to other members of the Armed Forces;
Whereas almost 213,000 female members of the Armed Forces have been deployed in 
        Iraq or Afghanistan or elsewhere overseas in support of the Global War 
        on Terror;
Whereas mothers who are married to members of the Armed Forces are left as the 
        sole parent with the children during the overseas deployment of their 
        spouse; and
Whereas the mothers of members of the Armed Forces provide emotional support and 
        love to their children in uniform, especially when they are serving in 
        harm's way: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the service and honors the sacrifice of the 
        approximately 147,000 members of the Armed Forces who are also 
        mothers;
            (2) recognizes the support provided by mothers of members 
        of the Armed Forces and by mothers who are the spouse of 
        members of the Armed Forces; and
            (3) recognizes that Americans owe a tremendous debt for the 
        service, patriotism, and fidelity of military mothers, mothers 
        of members of the Armed Forces, and military spouses given 
        their unique sacrifices and challenges in the service of the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25241-25242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12574]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging a Final Judgment by Consent Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act 
(CERCLA)

    In accordance with the Departmental Policy, 28 C.F.R. Sec. 50.7 
notice is hereby given that a consent decree in United States v. Ralph 
Riehl, et al., Civil Action No. 89-226E, was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on May 
3, 1996.
    On October 16, 1989, the United States filed a complaint against 
the owners and operator of, and certain transporters to, the Millcreek 
Dump Superfund Site (the ``Site''), pursuant to Section 107(a) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act 
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9607(a). In June 1992, the United States added 
certain ``generator'' defendants, including Alco Industries, Inc. 
(Alco), to the action. The consent decree is a ``cash-out'' decree 
which requires a payment of $325,000.00 and resolves the United States' 
cost claims against Alco and related corporate entities, for response 
costs incurred and to be incurred at the Millcreek Site.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication 
of this notice. Please address comments to the Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of 
Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044 
and refer to United States v. Ralph Riehl, et al., DOJ No. 90-11-3-519. 
In accordance with Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 6973(d), 
commenters may request a public meeting in the affected area.
    Copies of the proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the office 
of the United States Attorney, Western District of Pennsylvania, 
Federal Building and Courthouse, Room 137, 6th and State Streets, Erie, 
Pennsylvania, 15219; Region III Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005 (202) 624-0892). A copy of

[[Page 25242]]

the proposed Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005. When requesting a copy of the proposed Consent Decree, 
please enclose a check in the amount of $7.25 (twenty-five cents per 
page reproduction costs) payable to the ``Consent Decree Library.''
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 96-12574 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Discovery Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lou Ellen Ficke, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report
of filed for any purpose whatsoever. /s/ Lou Ellen FickeLou Ellen Ficke,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer June 30, 2005
Case 2:17-cr-01442-GMS Document 1 Filed 10/04/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01442-GMS Document 1 Filed 10/04/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01442-GMS Document 1 Filed 10/04/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01442-GMS Document 1 Filed 10/04/17 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00515-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00515-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00515-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-mj-00515-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 4 of 4
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

Z.W
., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 023

- 2388

[ June 13, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael J. Orlando, Judge; L.T. Case No. 23001255DLA

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin , Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepcion

, Senior Assis tant Attorney General , West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing

.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of FFBEC Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2015 (the “Report”), I, Jason Spatafora, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jason Spatafora


Jason Spatafora


Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


December 21, 2015





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11452]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, May 17, 1996.

PLACE: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, N.W., 
Suite 800, Board Room, Washington, D.C. 20005.

STATUS: Open/Closed.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General 
Counsel/Secretary 202/376-2441.

Agenda.

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes:
    March 4, 1996, Regular Meeting
III. Committee Appointments:
    a. Audit Committee
    b. Budget Committee
    c. Personnel Committee
IV. Election of Officers
V. Board Appointments
VI. Treasurer's Report
VII. Executive Director's Quarterly Management Report
VIII. Personnel Matters (Closed Meeting)
IX. Adjourn
Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11452 Filed 5-3-96; 1:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-M
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: R. T. Hardge v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 815

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 2 23224

Trial court: 1 8 0th District Court of Harris County

On September 20 , 2016 , we issued a “Second Order of Continuing Abatement” in

which we directed the trial court to appoint appellate counsel to represent appellant on

appeal . The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record that includes the trial

court’s order, signed on September 22 , 2016 , appointing Leah M. Borg to represent

appellant on appeal

. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active

docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually

Date: November 8, 2016
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary N. DAVIS, Appellant.

No. WD 51598.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 10, 1996.

David Simpson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVER STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellant Gary Davis was convicted following a jury trial of possession of a knife while in a correctional institution, in violation of Section 217.360.1(4) RSMo 1994. *405He was sentenced as a prior offender to five years in prison. He appeals his conviction, alleging that the trial court erred in failing to *sua sponte*declare a mistrial when the prosecutor, without objection, told the jury his personal opinions about the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. We do not find that the prosecutor improperly offered personal opinions or that his comments were so prejudicial as to have required the trial court to w *sponte*declare a mistrial. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order, but have provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 593 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 593

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 14 (legislative day, November 13), 2023

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To rename the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
clinic in Hinesville, Georgia, as the ``John Gibson, Dan James, William 
                 Sapp, and Frankie Smiley VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMUNITY-BASED 
              OUTPATIENT CLINIC, HINESVILLE, GEORGIA.

     The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
clinic in Hinesville, Georgia, shall after the date of the enactment of 
this Act be known and designated as the ``John Gibson, Dan James, 
William Sapp, and Frankie Smiley VA Clinic''. Any reference to such 
clinic in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of 
the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the John 
Gibson, Dan James, William Sapp, and Frankie Smiley VA Clinic.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 2:17-mj-00464-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00464-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00464-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00464-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-00464-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 5 of 5
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
 SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of the firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firms' workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
[5/21/2021 through 6/4/2021]
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for investigation
Product(s)Princeton Microwave Technology, Inc
5 Nami Lane, Mercerville, NJ 08619
5/27/2021
The firm manufactures electronic circuits.TIS Brewer, LLC
15 Industrial Plaza, Brewer, ME 04412
6/2/2021
The firm manufactures miscellaneous metal parts and components.Ampal, Inc
2115 Little Gap Road, Palmerton, PA 18071
6/3/2021
The firm manufactures aluminum powder.Sathorn Corporation
898 Main Street, Acton, MA 01720
6/4/2021
The firm manufactures miscellaneous metal parts and components.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.8 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Bryan Borlik, Director.


[FR Doc. 2021-12349 Filed 6-11-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P
Exhibit 10(b)






	Exhibit 10(b)




	CONSENT OF SWIDLER BERLIN
      SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP




	     We
hereby consent to the reference to our firm included in the prospectus and
statement of additional information of Mercury Target Select Equity Fund, Inc.
filed as part of Registration Statement No. 333-43136.









	/s/    Swidler Berlin
      Shereff Friedman, LLP	 




	New York, New York 

      November 20, 2000
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 of ASG Consolidated LLC (the
Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    BERNT O. BODALName:

Bernt O. BodalTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

November 14, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ASG Consolidated LLC and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Leslie ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant. Leslie ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 59616 and 61807.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 9, 1993.

Emily N. Blood, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of four counts of first degree robbery in violation of § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and one count of attempted first degree robbery in violation of § 564.011, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to life imprisonment on each of the robbery counts and 15-years imprisonment on the attempted robbery count. The sentences are to be served concurrently. In addition to his direct appeal, he appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*630The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

N.W.M. AND E.M., MINORS, THROUGH

THEIR PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS, J.M., N.M., AND J.A.M.,

Respondents

v.

PATRICE LANGENBACH AND DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 67 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 10 th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issues, as stated by petitioners are:

a. Whether quasi

- judicial immunity applies to a guardian ad litem is an issue of first impression and implicates a matter of public importance that requires prompt and definitive resolution by this Court.

b. This Court’s exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction is necessary because the Superior Court egregiously departed from accepted judicial practices when it concluded that Pennsylvania’s intermediate courts are without authority to pass on questions involving policy considerations.
#### Donna (Martinez) CAMPBELL, Respondent, v. Gualberto MARTINEZ, Appellant.

No. WD 42717.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 26, 1990.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1990.

Gualberto Martinez, Kansas City, pro se.

K. Elizabeth Davis, Div. of Child Support Enforcement, Liberty, for respondent.

Before MANFORD, P.J., and KENNEDY and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the denial of a motion to quash garnishment of wages for child support payments.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF 10-K/A REPORT**

**OF**

**CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009**

 

# 1.     Theundersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (“CrownMedia Holdings”).  This Certification ismade pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the 10-K/AReport of Crown Media Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2009.

#  

# 2.     Icertify to my knowledge that such 10-K/A Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K/A Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Crown Media Holdings.

#  

This Certification is executedas of April 30, 2010.

 

 
|   | /s/ WILLIAM J. ABBOTT                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | William  J. Abbott                     |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----