alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 316 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 2, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 85) setting 

forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010 and including the appropriate 

budgetary levels for fiscal years 2009 and 2011 through 

2014. The concurrent resolution shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. The concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. No amendment shall be in 

order except those printed in the report of the Committee on 

Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, and shall be debatable for 40 minutes equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent. All 

points of order against the amendments printed in the report 
2 

•HRES 316 EH 

are waived except that the adoption of an amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall constitute the conclusion of consideration of the concurrent resolution for amendment. After 

the conclusion of consideration of the concurrent resolution 

for amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the concurrent resolution to the House with such amendment as may 

have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the concurrent resolution and any amendment 

thereto to final adoption without intervening motion except 

amendments offered by the chair of the Committee on the 

Budget pursuant to section 305(a)(5) of the Congressional 

Budget Act of 1974 to achieve mathematical consistency. The 

concurrent resolution shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question of its adoption. 

SEC. 2. After adoption of House Concurrent Resolution 

85 and receipt of a message from the Senate transmitting 

Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, it shall be in order to take 

from the Speaker’s table Senate Concurrent Resolution 13 

and to consider the Senate concurrent resolution in the 

House. All points of order against consideration of the Senate 

concurrent resolution are waived. It shall be in order to move 

to strike all after the resolving clause of the Senate concurrent resolution and to insert in lieu thereof the provisions of 

House Concurrent Resolution 85 as adopted by the House. 

All points of order against that motion are waived. The Sen-
3 

•HRES 316 EH 

ate concurrent resolution shall not be subject to a demand for 

division of the question of its adoption. If the motion is 

adopted and the Senate concurrent resolution, as amended, is 

adopted, then it shall be in order to move that the House insist on its amendment to the Senate concurrent resolution 

and request a conference with the Senate thereon. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Case 2:17-mj-00517-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-mj-00517-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-mj-00517-MHB Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marani Brands, Inc. (“Marani”), on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Ara Zartarian, Chief Executive Officer of
Marani, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May
15, 2009





/s/Ara
    ZartarianBy:Ara
      ZartarianChief
      Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Roni Singer, Formerly Known as Roni S. Williams v. Robert 

L. Singer

Appellate case number: 01-14-00226-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-71242

Trial court: 247th Judicial District Court of Harris County

Appellant filed a “Motion to Abate Appeal and Order Trial Court to Sign Findings 

of Fact and Conclusions of Law.” In her motion, appellant contends that although the 

trial court has signed a Final Decree of Divorce on December 21, 2013 and appellant has

filed her request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on January 9, 2014 and notice 

of past due findings of fact and conclusions of law on January 28, 2014, the trial court 

has yet to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court must issue findings of fact and conclusions of law where the trial 

court, as here, has rendered a judgment dividing the estate of the parties. See Panchal v. 

Panchal, 132 S.W.3d 465, 466 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2003, order) (per curiam) (citing 

TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 6.711 (Vernon Supp. 2003)). Appellant twice timely requested 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, but the trial court failed to file them within 

twenty days of the requests. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 296, 297.

“Unless the appellate record affirmatively shows no harm to [appellant], the 

failure of the trial court to file properly-requested findings and conclusions on contested 

issues is presumed harmful.” In re Marriage of Rodriguez, No. 07-03-0078-CV, 2003 

WL 21309275, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo June 6, 2003, no pet.) (citing Cherne Indus., 

Inc. v. Magallanes, 763 S.W.2d 768, 772 (Tex. 1989)). We conclude that the record does 

not affirmatively show that appellant has not been harmed by the absence of findings of 

fact and conclusions of law and thus, the trial court’s error is not harmless. See TEX. R.

CIV. P. 296, 297; Rodriguez, 2003 WL 21309275, at *1; see also Magallanes, 763 

S.W.2d at 772.
Accordingly, we abate this case and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. On remand, we order the trial court to enter written findings of fact and 

conclusions of law on all issues decided by the trial court. The trial court is further 

directed to cause the trial court clerk to prepare and file with the appellate clerk a 

supplemental clerk’s record which includes the trial court’s findings of fact and 

conclusions of law, separate and apart from docket sheet notation. The supplemental 

clerk’s record shall be filed in this Court no later than 25 days from the date of this order.

This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a 

supplemental clerk’s record that complies with this order is filed with the Clerk of this 

Court. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 31, 2014
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12239]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC) will meet on 
May 30, 1996, at the Red Lion Inn Yakima Valley, 1507 North First 
Street, Yakima, Washington 98901. The purpose of the meeting is to 
continue discussions on the implementation of the Northwest Forest 
Plan. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. on May 30 and continue until 
4:00 p.m. Agenda items to be discussed include, but are not limited to: 
(1) government-to-government relationships and consultation, (2) IRICC 
vegetation data standards, (3) implementation and effectiveness 
monitoring, and (4) IRICC fish/hydro data standards. The IAC meeting 
will be open to the public. Written comments may be submitted for the 
record at the meeting. Time will also be scheduled for oral public 
comments. Interested persons are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding this meeting may 
be directed to Don Knowles, Executive Director, Regional Ecosystem 
Office, 333 SW 1st Avenue, P.O. Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (Phone: 
503-326-6265).

    Dated: May 7, 1996.
Donald R. Knowles,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 96-12239 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21446-21447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11806]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice of Open Meeting of Board of Advisors to the President, 
Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app.), notice is given that the Board of Advisors to the 
President, Naval War College, will meet on 29 and 30 May 1996 in Room 
210, Conolly Hall, Naval War College, 686 Cushing Road, Newport, Rhode 
Island. The meeting will commence at 8:30 a.m. on 29 May and terminate 
at approximately 12:00 p.m. on 30 May. The purpose of the

[[Page 21447]]

meeting is to elicit the advice of the Board on educational, doctrinal, 
and research policies and programs. The agenda will consist of 
presentations and discussions on the curriculum, programs and plans of 
the College, and is open to the public. For further information 
contact: Mrs. Mary E. Estabrooks, Assistant to the Dean of Academics, 
Naval War College, 686 Cushing Road, Newport, RI 02841-1207. Telephone 
Number (401) 841-3589.

    Dated: May 1, 1996.
M.A. Waters,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11806 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12438]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EL96-47-000]


Syracuse Power Company v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and 
Northern Electric Power Co., L.P.; Notice of Filing

May 14, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 17, 1996, Syracuse Power Company filed a 
complaint and request for an investigation relating to the activities 
of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Northern Electric Power Co., 
L.P., as co-licensees of the Hudson Falls Project No. 5276.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before June 15, 1996. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. Answers to the 
complaint shall be due on or before June 15, 1996.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12438 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IB 

House Calendar No. 35 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 296 

[Report No. 111–67] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 

1388) to reauthorize and reform the national service laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2009 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to 

the bill (H.R. 1388) to reauthorize and reform the national service laws. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 1388) to reauthorize and reform the national serv4 ice laws, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to con5 sider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

6 order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, 

7 a single motion offered by the chair of the Committee on 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 296 RH 

1 Education and Labor or his designee that the House con2 cur in the Senate amendments. The Senate amendments 

3 and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 

4 shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and con5 trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

6 Committee on Education and Labor. The previous ques7 tion shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final 

8 adoption without intervening motion or demand for divi9 sion of the question. 

10 SEC. 2. House Resolution 289 is laid on the table. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 35 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 296 

[Report No. 111–67] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendreform the national service laws. ments to the bill (H.R. 1388) to reauthorize and 

MARCH 30, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### DICKINSON RESOURCES, INC., Petitioner, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

No. 95-0066.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 11, 1995.

Kevin H. Dubose, James H. Pearson, Thomas A. Dickinson, Jeffrey W. Wheelock, Kyle R. Sears, Donald B. Henderson, Houston, for petitioner.

Leymon L. Solomon, Wayne A. Risoli, David M. Gunn, W. James Kronzer, Jr., David C. Holmes, Houston, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s application for writ of error is denied. The Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals’ discussion *454of the defendants covered by the waiver agreement. 889 S.W.2d 604, 607-08.
#### Harold Douglas GRANTHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 918-88.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Nov. 30, 1988.

James M. Stanley, Port Worth, for appellant.

Tim Curry, Dist. Atty. and C. Chris Marshall, Delonia A. Watson and Scott Wisch, Asst. Dist. Attys., Fort Worth, Robert Hut-tash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*662OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of attempted capital murder and the punishment was assessed at twenty (20) years in the Texas Department of Corrections. On direct appeal the conviction was affirmed. *Grantham v. State,*751 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review in which he contends, inter alia, that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that he had not preserved error and that he had not shown harm. In determining whether appellant had been harmed by the inclusion of this charge, the Court of Appeals analyzed the harm under the standards announced by this Court in *Almanza v. State,*686 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Cr.App.1984).

Recently, however, this Court delivered our opinion in *Rose v. State,*752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1988) (opinion on Court’s own motion for rehearing), in which we held that the appropriate vehicle to determine harm in this situation is found in Tex.R.App.Pro. 81(b)(2). Since the Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of this holding when they decided the instant cause, it is this Court’s opinion that the cause should be returned to them for such an analysis.

Therefore, this cause is remanded to the Second Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the harm caused appellant by the inclusion of the complained of charge in a manner consistent with *Rose,*and *Haynie v. State,*751 S.W.2d 878 (Tex.Cr.App.1988).

ONION, P.J., dissents and dissents to the remand.

TEAGUE, J., dissents to the remand.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ John Karlsson

John Karlsson
Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

January 19, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Presidential Documents

24661

Federal Register

Vol. 61, No. 95

Wednesday, May 15, 1996

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6894 of May 13, 1996

Older Americans Month, 1996

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

America’s high standard of living, advanced health care system, and commitment to better nutrition and physical fitness have allowed millions of our

citizens the luxury of long and fulfilling lives. Because current estimates

indicate that one in six Americans will be 65 or older by the year 2020,

our Nation faces new challenges as we seek to address the needs of this

growing population of seniors.

Fortunately, many of our older Americans—who have already led the way

in setting a sound course for our country’s future—are helping us to meet

these new challenges as well. Having lived through times of depression

and war, peace and prosperity, they have shaped our progress with their

achievements. The safety net they created—including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the provisions of the Older Americans Act—helps us

to honor our debt to senior citizens and ensures that Americans who have

worked hard throughout their lives can look forward to a secure retirement.

Each year, we set aside the month of May as a special time to pay tribute

to older Americans and to affirm our obligation to sustain and improve

their quality of life. The theme of this year’s observance, ‘‘Aging: A Lifetime

Opportunity,’’ underscores the gifts that older people offer to our country

every day. Thanks to senior citizens, our communities are stronger, our

Nation is more diverse, and we are better prepared to meet the challenges

of the next century.

As we celebrate the contributions of all those in their golden years, let

us recognize that long life is a gift we must cherish and a responsibility

for which we must prepare. With an eye toward the future and with the

example of today’s seniors firmly before us, we can prepare for a better

tomorrow for ourselves and for the generations of Americans to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 1996, as Older

Americans Month. I call upon Government officials, businesses, communities,

volunteers, educators, and all the people of the United States to acknowledge

the contributions made by older Americans this month and throughout

the year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirteenth day

of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-six, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 96–12418

Filed 5–14–96; 11:55 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twentieth.

œ–
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5996 

To prohibit any direct or indirect United States funding for the territory 

of Gaza unless certain conditions are met. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 19, 2023 

Mr. KUSTOFF (for himself, Mr. LAWLER, and Mr. MILLER of Ohio) 

introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit any direct or indirect United States funding 

for the territory of Gaza unless certain conditions are met. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Taxpayer Fund5 ing of Hamas Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON THE EXPENDITURE FOR FEDERAL 

7 FUNDS IN GAZA. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—No United States Government 

9 funds may be obligated or expended in the territory of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5996 IH

1 Gaza until after the President certifies to the Committee 

2 on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee 

3 on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives that— 

4 (1) such funds can be expended without benefit5 ting any organization or persons that is— 

6 (A) a member of Hamas, Palestinian Is7 lamic Jihad, or any other organization des8 ignated by the Secretary of State as a foreign 

9 terrorist organization under section 219 of the 

10 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

11 1189); or 

12 (B) controlled or influenced by Hamas, 

13 Palestinian Islamic Jihad, or any such foreign 

14 terrorist organization; and 

15 (2) all hostages who were taken to Gaza by 

16 Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, or any other or17 ganization designated by the Secretary of State as a 

18 foreign terrorist organization under section 219 of 

19 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

20 1189) have been freed. 

21 (b) UNITED NATIONS ENTITIES.—No United States 

22 Government funds may be obligated or expended in the 

23 territory of Gaza through any United Nations entity or 

24 office unless the President certifies to the congressional 

25 committees referred to in subsection (a) that such entity 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5996 IH

1 or office is not encouraging or teaching anti-Israel or anti2 Semitic ideas or propaganda. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Sinisa Djurdjic,

Defendant.

No. CR-17-01658-001-TUC-JGZ (DTF)

ORDER 

On July 12, 2022, the Court held a Status Conference and continued the jury trial to 

May 8, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. The Court directed that a separate order updating other deadlines 

would be issued. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that substantive motions are due 120 days prior the trial date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions in limine/notice/disclosure 

deadline is 60 days prior to the trial date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that jury instructions and voir dire are due 30 days 

prior to the trial date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial briefs are due 14 days prior to the trial 

date.

Dated this 29th day of August, 2022.

Case 4:17-cr-01658-JGZ-AMM Document 155 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 1