alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12408]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 332-350 and 332-351]


Monitoring of U.S. Imports of Tomatoes and Peppers

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice that Commission will not publish monitoring reports in 
1996.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 9, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy McCarty (202-205-3324) or 
Lowell Grant (202-205-3312), Agriculture and Forest Products Division, 
Office of Industries, or William Gearhart (202-205-3091), Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission. Hearing impaired 
persons can obtain information on these studies by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202-205-1810).

Background

    Section 316 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) 
Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3381) directs the Commission to monitor 
imports of fresh or chilled tomatoes (HTS heading 0702.00) and fresh or 
chilled peppers, other than chili peppers (HTS subheading 0709.60.00), 
until January 1, 2009, as if a request for such monitoring had been 
made under section 202(d) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2252(d)), 
for purposes of expediting an investigation concerning provisional 
relief under section 202 of the Trade Act of 1974. In response, the 
Commission instituted Investigation No. 332-350, Monitoring of U.S. 
Imports of Tomatoes (59 F.R. 1763, January 12, 1994) and Investigation 
No. 332-351, Monitoring of U.S. Imports of Peppers (59 F.R. 1762, 
January 12, 1994). Although section 316 of the NAFTA Implementation Act 
does not require the Commission to publish reports on the results of 
its monitoring activities, the Commission's notices announcing the 
investigations stated that the Commission planned to publish annual 
statistical reports of certain trade data through the year 2008.
    The Commission has recently instituted two investigations 
concerning imports of tomatoes and/or peppers, Investigation No. TA-
201-66, Fresh Tomatoes and Bell Peppers (61 F.R. 13875, March 28, 
1996), under section 202(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2252(b)); and preliminary antidumping Investigation No. 731-TA-747 
(Preliminary), Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico (61 F.R. 15968, April 10, 
1996), under section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1673b(a)). To avoid possible public confusion due to the release of 
multiple reports containing different data series, the Commission will 
not publish reports on the results of monitoring in 1996. The 
Commission will continue to monitor as required by section 316 of the 
NAFTA Implementation Act and will consider at a later date whether to 
resume publication of monitoring reports in 1997 and later years.

    Issued: May 13, 1996.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12408 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Abatement Order filed November 25 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00528

- CV

____________ HO & HUANG PROPERTIE S, L.P. AND SW PARKW AY MANAGEMENT, INC. , Appellant s

V.

PARKWAY DENTAL ASSOC IATES P.A. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007

- 69193



### ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 1, 2014

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. The record was not filed. On August 14, 2014 , this court ordered the court reporter , Michelle Tucker, to file the record within 30 days. When the court reporter failed to file the record as ordered, on October 8 , 2014 this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days, and instructed the court reporterthat if the record was not filed, the court would order the trial court to conduct a

hearing to determine the reason for failure to file the record. The record has not been filed with the court. The trial and appellate courts are joi ntly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as ordered, we issue the following order. We direct the judge of the 80th District Court to cond uct a hearing at which the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make f indings as to whether the court reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make fin dings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the record prior to the date set for the heari ng, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

RAUL GUADALUPE MONJARDINIRIBE, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10419 

D.C. No. 5:15-cr-00375-EJD-3

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019

**

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Raul Guadalupe Monjardin-Iribe appeals from the district court’s judgment 

and challenges the 175-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea 

conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute 

cocaine and methamphetamine, and distribution and possession with intent to 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-10419 

distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B) and 

846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Monjardin-Iribe contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in 

light of his mitigating circumstances, including the short time he was involved in 

the conspiracy and his lack of criminal history. The district court did not abuse its 

discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The withinGuidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the large 

quantity of drugs Monjardin-Iribe possessed, the substantial role he played in the 

offense, and his attempt to obstruct the investigation. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. 

Contrary to Monjardin-Iribe’s contention, the court did not “mechanically” apply 

the Guidelines in fashioning his sentence, but rather engaged in the type of 

individualized assessment of the sentencing factors required under section 3553(a). 

See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 994 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). 

Moreover, the court sufficiently addressed Monjardin-Iribe’s sentencing disparity 

argument, did not rely on any clearly erroneous facts in imposing the sentence, and 

adequately explained the sentence. See id. at 992-93.

We decline to consider issues raised for the first time in Monjardin-Iribe’s 

reply brief. See United States v. Kama, 394 F.3d 1236, 1238 (9th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10443]



      

[[Page 18923]]


_______________________________________________________________________

Part VII





Department of the Interior





_______________________________________________________________________



Fish and Wildlife Service



_______________________________________________________________________



50 CFR Part 20



Migratory Bird Hunting: Nontoxic Shot Approval Procedures for Shot and 
Shot Coatings, Test Protocol; Proposed Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 1996 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 18924]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AB80


Migratory Bird Hunting: Amended Test Protocol for Nontoxic Shot 
Approval Procedures for Shot and Shot Coatings; Proposed Rule

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed Rule; Extension of Comment Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the 
extension of the comment period for the Service's January 26, 1996, 
Amended test protocol for nontoxic shot approval procedures Proposed 
Rule published in the Federal Register (61 FR 2470) from March 26, 
1996, to May 10, 1996.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed framework will end on May 
10, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Chief, Office of 
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department 
of the Interior, ms--634 ARLSQ, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20240. Comments received will be available for public inspection during 
normal business hours in Room 634, Arlington Square Building, 4401 N. 
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul R. Schmidt, Office of Migratory 
Bird Management, (703) 358-1714, FAX (703) 358-2217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service announced in the January 26, 
1996, Federal Register the amended test protocol for nontoxic shot 
approval procedures for shot and shot coatings for migratory bird 
hunting. The proposed protocol will update and amend the current 
nontoxic shot approval procedures by establishing a 3-tiered approval 
process. Shot will be considered at each tier with the testing becoming 
progressively more demanding. An environmentally benign shot could be 
granted approval at the first tier. This process is designed to include 
both candidate shot and shot coatings.
    The comment period is being extended to incorporate views from all 
parties that have expressed an interest in reviewing the proposed rule.

    Dated: April 15, 1996
George T. Frampton, Jr.

Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks
[FR Doc. 96-10443 Filed 4-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-F
Certification Pursuant to
                        1850 USC, Section 1350,
                        As Adopted Pursuant To
           Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Marc E. Combs, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peer
Review Mediation and Arbitration, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and  procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 22, 2011          /s/Marc E. Combs
                               ----------------------------
                               Marc E. Combs, Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony HARRINGTON, Appellant. Anthony HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60143, 61923.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 16, 1993.

Marilynn Rydlund, Emily N. Blood, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by jury of possession of cocaine, a Class C felony, and distribution of cocaine near a school, a Class A felony. He was sentenced as a prior offender. He appeals the denial, after a hearing, of his 29.15 motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel and appeals his conviction under § 195.214, RSMo (Supp.1992). We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.25(b). No error of law appears; the motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only.
Beckstead and Watts, LLP
Certified Public Accountant
                                                       3340 Wynn Road Suite C
                                                          Las Vegas, NV 89102
                                                                 702.257.1984
                                                             702.362.0540 fax





March 27, 2003


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Beckstead and Watts, LLP, consents to the inclusion of our report
of March 27, 2003, on the Financial Statements of Nothing Corp. for the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, in its Form 10K-SB filing to be filed  with
the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,


/s/ Beckstead and Watts, LLP


Beckstead and Watts, LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 240 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 240

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 17, 2009.
Whereas social workers have the demonstrated education and experience to guide 
        individuals, families, and communities through complex issues and 
        choices;
Whereas social workers help people in all stages of life, from children to the 
        elderly, and in all situations from adoption to hospice care;
Whereas social workers are in schools, courtrooms, drug clinics, hospitals, 
        senior centers, shelters, nursing homes, the military, disaster relief, 
        prisons, and corporations;
Whereas social workers are dedicated to improving the society in which we live 
        and connecting individuals, families, and communities to available 
        resources;
Whereas social workers stand up for others to make sure everyone has access to 
        the same basic rights, protections, and opportunities;
Whereas social workers, such as Harry Hopkins, Frances Perkins, Whitney M. 
        Young, Jr., and Dr. Dorothy I. Height have been the driving force behind 
        important social movements in the United States and abroad;
Whereas, according to the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics, employment for social workers is expected to grow much 
        faster than the average for all occupations;
Whereas Professional Social Work Month and World Social Work Day, which is March 
        17, 2009, will build awareness of the role of professional social 
        workers and their commitment and dedication to individuals, families, 
        and communities everywhere though service delivery, research, education, 
        and legislative advocacy; and
Whereas the 2009 Social Work Month theme--Social Work: Purpose and Possibility--
        highlights the special characteristics of those who choose social work 
        as a profession, and underscores the goals of their work: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Professional Social Work Month 
        and World Social Work Day;
            (2) acknowledges the diligent efforts of individuals and groups who 
        promote the importance of social work and who are observing Professional 
        Social Work Month and World Social Work Day;
            (3) encourages the American people to engage in appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities to further promote awareness of the life-
        changing role of social workers;
            (4) recognizes with gratitude the contributions of the millions of 
        caring individuals who have chosen to serve their communities through 
        social work; and
            (5) encourages young people to seek out educational and professional 
        opportunities to become social workers.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit
10.4


AMENDMENT
TEN TO THE

1995 KEY EMPLOYEES’ STOCK
OPTION PLAN OF DUKE REALTY

INVESTMENTS, INC.


This Amendment Ten to the 1995 Key Employees’ Stock
Option Plan of Duke Realty Investments, Inc., as heretofore amended (the “Plan”),
is hereby adopted this 26th day of July, 2006, by Duke Realty Corporation (the “Corporation”).
Each capitalized term not otherwise defined herein has the meaning set forth in
the Plan.


WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Corporation adopted the Plan for the
purposes set forth therein; and


WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Corporation has the
right at any time, by action of the Board of Directors, to amend the Plan in
whole or in part; and


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation
of its Executive Compensation Committee, has approved and authorized this
Amendment Ten to the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, in the following
particulars:


1.             By
amending Section 4.2(a), by deleting the first sentence thereof and replacing
it with the following two sentences:


“In the event of any change in the value or
composition of the common stock of the Company through stock dividends,
extraordinary cash dividends, split-ups, recapitalizations, conversions, or
otherwise, then the Committee shall make appropriate adjustment in the
aggregate number, price and kind of shares available under the Plan and in the
number, price and kind of shares covered under any options granted under the
Plan. In the event that other stock shall be converted into or substituted for
the present common stock of the Company as the result of any merger,
consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction which results in a Change
in Control of the Company, then the Committee may make appropriate adjustment
or substitution in the aggregate number, price and kind of shares available
under the Plan and in the number, price and kind of shares covered under any
options granted under the Plan.”


All other provisions of the Plan shall remain the
same.









 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Duke Realty Corporation, by a duly
authorized officer, has executed this Amendment Ten to 1995 Key Employees’
Stock Option Plan of Duke Realty Investments, Inc., this 26th day of July,
2006.


	
  

  	
  DUKE REALTY CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Dennis D. Oklak

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Dennis D. Oklak

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

  



 



 2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of China
Infrastructure Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.




Date:            
June 28, 2010





/s/
      Li XipengName:
      Li XipengTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer Chairman of the
      Board





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.