alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the amended Annual report of Reflect Scientific, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the period ending March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Annual Report"), we, Kim Boyce, President and director, and Kevin Cooksy,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 6/26/06                           /s/Kim Boyce
       -------                           ---------------------------
                                         Kim Boyce
                                         President and Director

Dated: 6/26/06                           /s/Kevin Cooksy
      --------                           ---------------------------
                                         Kevin Cooksy
                                         Secretary/Treasurer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5962 

To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ‘‘Mount Blue Sky 

Wilderness’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2023 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself and Ms. PETTERSEN) introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ‘‘Mount 

Blue Sky Wilderness’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mount Blue Sky Wil5 derness Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5962 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE MOUNT EVANS WILDER2 NESS AS THE ‘‘MOUNT BLUE SKY WILDER3 NESS’’. 

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 102(a)(10) of Public 

5 Law 96–560 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 94 Stat. 3267) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘as the Mount Evans Wilderness;’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘as the ‘Mount Blue Sky Wilderness’;’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the Mount Evans Wilderness shall be deemed 

11 to be a reference to the ‘‘Mount Blue Sky Wilderness’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
              OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Paramco
Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Douglas G. Gregg, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                      of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material         respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of the Company.

            A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



Date: April 14, 2004         By: /s/ Douglas G. Gregg
                                 --------------------
                              Douglas G. Gregg
                              Acting Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5746 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand the availability 

of supplemental benefits to certain Medicare Advantage enrollees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2023 

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in 

addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand 

the availability of supplemental benefits to certain Medicare Advantage enrollees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Addressing Whole 

5 Health in Medicare Advantage Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5746 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE AVAILABILITY OF SUPPLEMENTAL 

2 BENEFITS TO CERTAIN MEDICARE ADVAN3 TAGE ENROLLEES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1852(a)(3)(D) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–22(a)(3)(D)) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in the header, by striking ‘‘CHRONICALLY

8 ILL’’ and inserting ‘‘CERTAIN’’; 

9 (2) in clauses (i) and (ii), by striking ‘‘chron10 ically ill’’ each place such term appears and insert11 ing ‘‘specified’’ in each such place; and 

12 (3) in clause (iii), by amending such clause to 

13 read as follows: 

14 ‘‘(iii) SPECIFIED ENROLLEE DE15 FINED.—In this subparagraph, the term 

16 ‘specified enrollee’ means an enrollee in an 

17 MA plan that— 

18 ‘‘(I) the Secretary determines— 

19 ‘‘(aa) has one or more co20 morbid and medically complex 

21 chronic conditions that is life 

22 threatening or significantly limits 

23 the overall health or function of 

24 the enrollee; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5746 IH

1 ‘‘(bb) has a high risk of hos2 pitalization or other adverse 

3 health outcomes; or 

4 ‘‘(cc) requires intensive care 

5 coordination; 

6 ‘‘(II) is a low-income enrollee (as 

7 specified by the Secretary); or 

8 ‘‘(III) meets any other criterion 

9 determined appropriate by the Sec10 retary, such as criteria relating to so11 cial and socioeconomic risk.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to plan years begin14 ning on or after January 1, 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 32.0**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEYSECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SoftBrands, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ George H. Ellis                                        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| George H. Ellis                                            |
| *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*                     |
| * *                                                   |
| October 5, 2005                                            |
|                                                       |
| /s/ David G. Latzke                                        |   |
| David G. Latzke                                            |
| *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer*  |
| * *                                                   |
| October 5, 2005                                            |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File No 333-121594, 333-43718, 333-70376, 333-130503, 333-130504 and
333-130506) of CorVu Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated July 25,
2006, which appears on page 15 of this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 2006.

                                              /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 13, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

/s/ DAVID POMERANTZ__________________________David PomerantzPrincipal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerDated: January 14, 2008

























Page 21 of 21

---
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this amended Quarterly Report of Sports Source, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Tubbs, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     Such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sports Source, Inc.

 
| Dated: February 27, 2006 |
|--------------------------|

 

**SPORTS SOURCE, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ James Tubbs* |
|-----|-------------------|

President, Chief Executive Officer 

Chief Financial Officer and

Chairman of Board of Directors
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital
Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.





Date:
November 12, 2008





/s/Michael A. Reisner


Michael
A. Reisner


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 588 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to transfer, without reimbursement, materials to construct roadways and physical barriers along the 

southern border of the United States to the Governments of the States 

in which such materials are located, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. BAIRD (for himself, Mr. CAREY, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. FALLON, and Mr. 

WALBERG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to transfer, 

without reimbursement, materials to construct roadways 

and physical barriers along the southern border of the 

United States to the Governments of the States in which 

such materials are located, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Construction 

5 Materials Transfer Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 588 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF BARRIER AND ROADWAY CONSTRUC2 TION MATERIALS TO STATE GOVERNMENTS. 

3 (a) TRANSFER OF COVERED MATERIALS.—Begin4 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec5 retary of Homeland Security shall transfer, without reim6 bursement— 

7 (1) all covered materials located, as of the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act, in Texas to the Gov9 ernment of Texas; 

10 (2) all covered materials located, as of the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act, in Arizona to the Gov12 ernment of Arizona; 

13 (3) all covered materials located, as of the date 

14 of the enactment of this Act, in New Mexico to the 

15 Government of New Mexico; and 

16 (4) all covered materials located, as of the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act, in California to the 

18 Government of California. 

19 (b) PHYSICAL RELOCATION OF MATERIALS.—The 

20 Secretary of Homeland Security shall be responsible for 

21 the physical relocation of all covered materials transferred 

22 under this section to appropriate State-operated facilities. 

23 (c) COVERED MATERIALS.—In this section, the term 

24 ‘‘covered materials’’ means all unused materials in the 

25 possession of the Federal Government that were purVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:04 Mar 09, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H588.IH H588

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 588 IH

1 chased to construct roadways or physical barriers along 

2 the southern border of the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Blima Goldberg, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Rifky Goldberg, et al., Appellants, v Union Hardware Co., Defendant, and Handi-Pac, Respondent.

In a strict products liability action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), entered September 8, 1988, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the respondent and against them on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that "a jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside unless 'the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence’ ” *(Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129, 134, quoting from *Delgado v Board of Educ.,*65 AD2d 547, *affd*48 NY2d 643; *see also, Frank v Fisher,*142 AD2d 665). In the instant case, the trial evidence clearly supported the jury’s verdict in that it established that the respondent’s "Union 7 Champion” model roller skates were not defectively designed. Indeed, since 1978, when the respondent began marketing that model of roller skates, the evidence established that it had received no consumer complaints *(see, Karr v Inecto, Inc.,*247 NY 360; *Kempf v Zotos Corp.,*261 App Div 821; *see generally,*47 NY Jur, Products Liability, § 16). Moreover, the absence of any com*659plaints as to the adequacy of the toe clamps utilized on the "Union 7 Champion” model roller skate supports the jury’s verdict that the respondent did not breach a duty to warn consumers not to wear sneakers or other soft-soled shoes in conjunction with these roller skates. "There can be no negligence in failing to warn about a risk in the absence of evidence that would justify a finding that a manufacturer * * * knew or in the exercise of ordinary care should have known about it” (Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 96, at 685 [5th ed]; see *also, Cover v Cohen,*61 NY2d 261, 275-276). In the case at bar, while there was evidence that larger clamps were superior in design, there was no proof that the respondent was or should have been aware that its "Union 7 Champion” model skates were potentially defective when used by a sneaker-clad skater. The testimony of both the plaintiffs’ and the respondent’s expert witnesses also supported the jury’s verdict.

The plaintiffs’ claim with regard to the form of the verdict sheet was not raised before the trial court and, accordingly, any issue of law with respect thereto has not been preserved for appellate review *(Bichler v Lilly & Co.,*55 NY2d 571, 583; *Newsome v Cservak,*130 AD2d 637). In any event we discern no errors in the verdict sheet which warrant reversal of the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict. Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60370 Conference Calendar

__________________
ALAN MCFADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus EDWARD HARGETT, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY; CALBERT TAYLOR; SANDRA BECK; JAMES BEASLEY; MARGAN COLEMAN; JOHN SEGAR; WILLIE MAE FULLER, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:94CV227-S-O

- - - - - - - - - - August 23, 1995
Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alan McFadden appeals the judgment of the district court dismissing his civil rights action with prejudice for failure to comply with the district court's order to exhaust administrative remedies. McFadden argues that the district court erred becauseNo. 95-60370 -2- he cannot obtain relief through the Mississippi Department of Corrections's (MDOC) Administrative Remedy Program, which does not provide for monetary damages. The exhaustion requirement of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, applies to a prisoner's suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking both monetary and injunctive relief. Arvie v. Stalder , 53 F.3d 702, 706 (5th Cir. 1995). Because McFadden requested injunctive and declaratory relief and money damages, the district court properly dismissed his claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. McFadden challenges the Administrative Remedy Program at MDOC. He contends that the program is a product of a criminal conspiracy and does not meet the minimum requirements of CRIPA. McFadden's issue is barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. See McDuffie v. Estelle , 935 F.2d 682, 685 (5th Cir. 1991). McFadden raised the identical issue previously in McFadden v. Welch , No. 95-60151 at 2 (5th Cir. June 15, 1995) (unpublished). The court held that the plaintiffs, who were unnamed class members in Gates v. Collier , GC71-6-S-D, could not collaterally challenge the Gates order certifying the Administrative Remedy Program. T he issue was critical in that action, and claim preclusion is appropriate in this case. McFadden is warned that future attempts to litigate the same issue will result in the imposition of sanctions. See Smith v. McCleod , 946 F.2d 417, 418 (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v. Carpenter , 921 F.2d 68, 69 (5th Cir. 1991).No. 95-60370 -3-
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marani Brands, Inc. (“Marani”), on Form
10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Ara Zartarian, Chief Executive Officer of
Marani, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
February 17, 2008




By:
                    /s/Ara
      ZartarianAra
      ZartarianChief
      Executive Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary M. DAVIDSON, Appellant.

Nos. WD 49540, WD 51454.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 17, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and SPINDEN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*105ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary M. Davidson appeals his conviction for attempted rape and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert SAVAGE, Appellant. Robert SAVAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 66176, 68205.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Jan. 23, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 28, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defenders, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*389Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert Savage, appeals from his sentence of twenty-five years for rape entered on a jury verdict, § 566.030 RSMo. 1994. He also appeals the denial of his 29.15 motion. The appeals are consolidated herein pursuant to Rule 29.15(1).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court pursuant to Rule 30.25, and the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.