alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the****Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), theundersigned officer of Discovery Bancorp (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 12, 2005 /s/ Lou Ellen Ficke     Lou Ellen Ficke  *Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer*          The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report oras a separate disclosure document.
34
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lance G. McMULLIN, Appellant.

No. WD 47772.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 1, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 1994.

*466Gerald M. Handley, Handley Larson, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lance G. McMullin appeals from a conviction for murder in the first degree, in violation of § 565.020.1, RSMol986, in the death of Darrin Waddell. McMullin was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b).
Exhibit
32.3








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Leasing Fund
Eleven, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.





Date:
November 12, 2008





/s/Anthony J.
Branca__


Anthony
J. Branca


Chief
Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9

                             [English translation]

                         [IFCO Systems GmbH Letterhead]

         Payment Agreement

         by and between SWS, Vilsteren PD, Netherlands 7734

         and

         Ifco, Pullach 82049, Germany

                                                                  March 27, 2002


Because Ifco cannot fulfil its overdue payment obligations amounting to about
(euro) 5,000,000, SWS is ready to adjust the payment due dates under the
following conditions:

1.
The new framework agreement, as agreed on in Amsterdam, shall be signed by March
29, 2002.

2.
Property rights to the palettes delivered after April 1, 2002, shall remain with
SWS. These crates shall be delivered with retention of title until final
payment. The management of Ifco shall take suitable measures to secure the
collaterals for SWS.

3a.
The following payment plan shall be agreed on for payment of outstanding debts
from deliveries in 2001:
 - (Euro) 1.5 million on May 31, 2002
 - (Euro) 1.5 million on June 30, 2002
 - (Euro) 2.0 million on July 30, 2002

3b.
For payment of the outstanding debts of about (euro) 3.5 million for crates
already delivered in January and February 2002, the following payment plan shall
be agreed upon:
 - weekly payments of (euro) 500,000.00 beginning on June 1, 2002 until payment
   of the debt

3c.
Deliveries beginning on March 1, 2002, shall be paid on time, sixty days after
   receipt of invoice.

<PAGE>
  4.
  Interest of 0.67% per month shall be charged on all claims by SWS named in
  point 3 and paid by Ifco. If Ifco shall have sufficient funds by refinancing
  to pay suppliers, then SWS shall be appropriately paid.

  5.
  The agreement reached between the parties on March 15, 2002 in regard to the
  3,666 tons of crates, shall be adjusted beginning on April 1, 2002, by having
  50% of all orders for this crate material, ordered and appropriately invoiced
  by SWS, delivered by Ifco Material free of charge, and the remaining 50% of
  orders mutually offset at a materials price of 1.78 DM per kg of material.

  6.
  The prices for all quantities delivered in 2002, as well as in the new
  framework agreement, shall be raised by (euro) 0.05 per kg, if Ifco does not
  keep to one of the payment agreements named under item 3, regardless of
  whether the payment remains outstanding.

  7.
  It shall be agreed for the U.S.A. that the existing supply agreement shall
  remain in force. If Ifco has secured the final refinancing, including the bond
  arrangement, and simultaneously has given SWS a minimum delivery guarantee for
  at least 5 years, the parties shall be prepared to negotiate a price
  adjustment.

  Completion of the three 6424 tools shall be temporarily halted until liquidity
  has re-stabilized.

  Schoeller Wavin Systems N.V.              Ifco Systems GmbH

    /s/ R. WOLFKAMP  /s/ E. DE BOKS            /s/ K. POHLER  /s/ W. ORGELDINGER

  R Wolfkamp,  E. de Bokx                   K. Pohler, W. Orgeldinger
#### Thomas *v.*Martin *et al.*

No. 3328.

December 15, 1922.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Worrill. Seminole superior court. June 30, 1922.

*John E. Brahe*and *W. V. Ouster,*for plaintiff.

*M. E. O’Neal,*for defendants.

Gilbert, J.

W. L. Thomas filed a petition in the court of ordinary for a writ of habeas corpus against A. J. and Florence P. Martin, to obtain possession and custody of his minor son, John Ashley Thomas, four years of age. The defendants were the grandparents of the child. The mother of the child' died when he was ten days old, and the defendants, with the permission of the father, took possession of the child and eared for and reared him until the time of the trial. There was evidence of a written contract in regard to the custody of the child, and of the subsequent modification of the same. The evidence was conflicting. The ordinary rendered a judgment awarding the child to the grandparents. The father sued out a writ of certiorari to the superior court. After consideration of the case the judge of the superior court rendered a judgment denying the writ of certiorari. The plaintiff excepted. *Held:*It appearing that the judgment of the court of ordinary was rendered on conflicting evidence, and that the same was not an abuse of discretion, the judge of the superior court did not err in denying the writ of certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2233

AZEB GETAHUN, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-350-662) Submitted: March 25, 2005 Decided: April 13, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elliott C. Lichtman, Joseph J. Kranyak, LICHTMAN TRISTER & ROSS, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michelle Gorden, Senior Litigation Counsel, John E. Cunningham, III, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Azeb Getahun, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s order denying her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. In her petition for review, Getahun challenges the immigration judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Getahun fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that she seeks. Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of Getahun’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Getahun fails to show that she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.- 3 - Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 19, 2017

No. 04-17-00067-CV

IN THE MATTER OF S.O.W.

From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1994-JUV-02115 W1

Honorable Laura Parker, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion issued this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on July 19, 2017.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of July, 2017.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wren, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Teri Sundh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Teri Sundh Date: May 19, 2009 Teri Sundh Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David ORESCANIN, Appellant.

No. WD 46421.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 17, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 28, 1994.-

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 15, 1994.

Matthew J. O’Connor, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from conviction and sentence of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1986 and from denial of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).
H. Res. 266 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 14, 2009. 

Whereas the United States established diplomatic relations 

with the newly independent Second Polish Republic in 

April 1919; 

Whereas the year 2009 marks the 20th anniversary of the 

fall of communism in Poland, as well as the restoration 

of democracy and market economy in that country; 

Whereas the year 2009 marks the 10th anniversary of Poland’s accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); 

Whereas the year 2009 marks the 5th anniversary of Poland’s accession to the European Union (EU); 

Whereas the year 2009 marks the 50th anniversary of the 

Fulbright Educational Exchange Program in Poland; 

Whereas Poland has overcome a legacy of foreign occupation 

and period of communist rule to emerge as a free and 

democratic nation; 

Whereas Poland is a valued partner in the fight against global terrorism and has contributed troops to the stabilization and reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq; 

and 
2 

•HRES 266 EH 

Whereas Poland has cooperated closely with the United 

States on issues such as democratization, nuclear nonproliferation, human rights, regional cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe, and reform of the United Nations: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) celebrates the 90th anniversary of United 

States-Polish diplomatic relations; 

(2) congratulates the Polish people on their great 

accomplishments as a free democracy; and 

(3) expresses appreciation for Poland’s steadfast 

partnership with the United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1.

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, Anthony Brandon Escobar, Chief Executive Officer of Trafalgar Resources, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period December 31, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|   | By: /s/ Anthony Brandon Escobar |
|--------|---------------------------------|

|   | ------------------------------- |
|--------|---------------------------------|

|   | Anthony Brandon Escobar |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

 

February 19, 2008

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trafalgar Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Trafalgar Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,832-01

EX PARTE MARTIN GORMLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1469800-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted ofsuper-aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to fortyfour years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Gormley v. State, No.

01-16-00717-CR (Tex. App.—Nov. 16, 2017) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

In a single ground, Applicant contends that he was denied his right to file a petition for

discretionary review (PDR). The trial court made findings offact and conclusions oflaw but did not

determine whether Applicant was entitled to an out-of-time PDR. Based on the totality ofthe record,

we conclude that Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time PDR.
2

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,

180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time PDR of the judgment

of the First Court of Appeals in cause number 01-16-00717-CR. Should Applicant decide to file a

PDR, he must file it with this Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: October 21, 2020

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 595 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 595

To extend the right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board to 
         certain employees of the United States Postal Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2023

    Mr. Connolly (for himself, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. 
 Schakowsky, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Kilmer, and Mr. Lynch) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                           and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board to 
         certain employees of the United States Postal Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Employee Appeal Rights 
Amendment Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT OF APPEAL TO MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

    Section 1005(a)(4)(A)(ii)(I) of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
                                    ``(I) is an officer or employee of 
                                the Postal Service who--
                                            ``(aa) is not represented 
                                        by a bargaining representative 
                                        recognized under section 1203; 
                                        and
                                            ``(bb) is in a supervisory, 
                                        professional, technical, 
                                        clerical, administrative, or 
                                        managerial position covered by 
                                        the Executive and 
                                        Administrative Schedule; and''.
                                 <all>
```
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J UNE 19, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 15 75 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 1 :1 1- cv -0 07 43 -WSD PHYLLIS ALLEN, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t,
ve rs us BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, MCC ALLA RAYMER, LLC, Defen da nt s- App el le es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ernDis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Jun e 1 9, 2 01 2) Befo re TJ OFLAT, JORDAN andANDERSON, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Thi s i s a c iv il act io n s te m m in g fr om

th e al le ge dl y

wron gf ul for ecl os ur e o fres id en ti al pro pe rty. T he su itbe ga n i n s ta te co urt, an d d efen da nt s re m ov edth e

cas e to th e Dis tri ctCo urt b ecau se itco nt ai ne d acla im un de r th e Rea l Es ta te Set tl em en t Pr oc edur es Act (“ RESPA”) , 12 U.S.C. § § 26 01 et seq ., andgave th e
co urt s ub ject m at te r juri sd ic ti on . Se e 28 U.S.C. § 1 33 1. Defe nd an ts m ov edth e di st ric t co urt t o d is m is s p la in ti ff’s co m pl ai ntfor fai lu re t o s ta te a cl ai m

for rel ie f. Pl ai nt iff fai le d t o re sp on d t o d efen da nt s’ m ot io ns to di sm is s, as requi redby the Dis tri ctCo urt’s Lo cal Ru le 7.1 . Then , fol lo win g i ts in de pe nd en t re vi ew of th e
co m pl ai nt ’s all eg at io ns , th e Dis tri ctCo urt fo un d n o m eri t i n a ny of p la in ti ff’s cl ai m s an d, i n a n o rd er en te redon Marc h 3 1, 2 01 1, g ran te d d efen da nt s’ m ot io ns . Rec or d, Vo l. 1 at Tab 12
. Tenda y s l at er, p la in ti ff m ov edth e co urt p ur su an t t o F ed eral Ru le of C iv il Pro cedur e 6 0( b) (4 ) an d (6 ) to setasi de th e co urt’s jud gm en t fo r la ckof s ub ject
m at te r juri sd ic ti onan d fo r le av e to fil e a m ot io n t o re m an d. Th e Dis tri ctCo urt de ni edth e m ot io n i n a n o rd er en te redon Nov em be r 7, 2 01 1, id . at Tab 12 , andon Decem be r 5, 2 01 1, p la in ti ff fi le d ano ti ce o f ap pe al , app eal in g t he Dis tri ctCo urt’s Nov em be r 7, 2 01 1 o rd er d eny in g h er Ru le 60 (b )(4 )(an d (6 ) m ot io n. Id . at Tab 21
. W e fi ndno erro r in th e Dis tri ctCo urt’s No ve m be r 7, 2 01 1 o rd er. Itis th eref or e AFFIR MED.
2
Specimen Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.2 

 


 

  
 TOW 

TOWER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 

CUSIP 891826 10 9 

This Certifies that 

is the owner of 

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE PAR VALUE OF $0.01 EACH OF COMMON STOCK OF 

TOWER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate
properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. 

This certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 

WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers. 

DATED 

SIGNATURE TO COME 

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT 

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

SIGNATURE TO COME 

SECRETARY 

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 

AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 

(New York, NY) 

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 

BY: 

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 








 

 

  
 The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they 

were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 

TEN COM – as tenants in common 

TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties 

JT TEN – as joint tenants with right 

of survivorship and not as 

tenants in common 

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– 

Custodian 

(Cust) (Minor) 

under Uniform Gifts to Minors 

Act 

(State) 

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE 

Shares 

of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably 

constitute and appoint 

Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of 

substitution in the premises. 

Dated, 

NOTICE: 

THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH 

THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN 

EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR 

ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 

SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 

THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR 

INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS 

AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE 

GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.