alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, George J. Zilich, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: June 14, 2006         /s/ George J. Zilich         By: George J. Zilich,    Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
#### In re the Marriage of: Robbie Theresa BEARD, Appellant, v. Billy Ray BEARD, Respondent.

No. 67948.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Jan. 23, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 28, 1996.

Blair Kenneth Drazic, Creve Coeur, for appellant.

Daniel Robert Sokol, Clayton, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and CRAHAN and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals from a judgment of dissolution of marriage of the Circuit Court of St. *385Louis County in regards to property division and maintenance. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the decree is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. A detailed opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court’s decree is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5867 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, as the ‘‘Colonel Joseph 

William Kittinger II Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2023 

Mr. MILLS (for himself, Mr. POSEY, Mr. MAST, and Mr. BEAN of Florida) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, as the ‘‘Colonel Joseph William Kittinger II Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COLONEL JOSEPH WILLIAM KITTINGER II POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in 

7 Casselberry, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5867 IH

1 ‘‘Colonel Joseph William Kittinger II Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Colonel Joseph Wil7 liam Kittinger II Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") Kenneth Bosket, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/
      Kenneth BosketKenneth
      Bosket
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Dated:
      March  9, 2010





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.










CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report), Lowell Holden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




/s/
      Lowell HoldenLowell
      Holden
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                Dated:
      March  9, 2010





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 29 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARVIN M. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-3385 (D.C. No. 96-3398-RDR) (District of Kansas)

ORDER

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. Marvin M. Smith attempts to appeal from an order denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter is before us upon an application for a certificate of appealability. Having examined Mr. Smith’s brief and the record before us, we conclude the district court did not err. Therefore, Mr. Smith has failed to demonstrate the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the issues differently; or that the questions deserve further proceedings. The certificate of appealability is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Lennox v. Evans , 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir. 1996). ENTERED FOR THE COURT John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-50675

Summary Calendar

_____________________

ALAN LOUIS CHAVIS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOE AGUIRRE, Warden,

F.C.P. El Paso,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-97-CV-41

_________________________________________________________________

April 21, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alan Louis Chavis, federal prisoner #26139-080, appeals from

the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition.

Chavis contended that the United States Parole Commission violated

his due process rights by not allowing him an opportunity to rebut

his parole violation charges before all of the hearing examiners.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for essentially

the reasons given by the district court. Chavis v. Aguirre, No.

EP-97-CA-41-H (W.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 1997).
-2-

A F F I R M E D.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00172-CR

Carlos Pantoja, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

NO. 03-08-00173-CR

Carlos Alberto Pantoja, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-07-300047 & D-1-DC-07-300101

HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Carlos Pantoja seeks to appeal judgments of conviction for aggravated robbery. The

trial court has certified that Pantoja waived the right of appeal. The appeals are dismissed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
2

__________________________________________

Diane Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: April 4, 2008

Do Not Publish
#### EDGAR SPRINGS RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT, Respondent, v. William KIVETT (Kevitt), Appellant.

No. 78752.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

Nov. 19, 1996.

Mark Calvert, Rolla, for respondent.

Dan L. Birdsong, Rolla, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The fire department is a volunteer fire protection association as defined in section 320.300, RSMo 1994. It responded to two fires on Mr. Kivett’s property. Mr. Kivett was not a member of the fire department. The fire department filed suit to recover the reasonable value of the services it provided to Mr. Kivett. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for the fire department after hearing evidence.

Finding no error of law and determining that an opinion would have no precedential value, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed by this memorandum decision. *Rule 84.16(b).*

All concur.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Rudolf Mauer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Blackstone Lake Minerals Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2008, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

| | By:    | /s/
      Rudolf Mauer          
| | ------ | --------------------------------
| |        |                                 
| | Name:  | RUDOLF MAUER                    
| |        |                                 
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and     
| |        | Chief Financial
    Officer     
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer and
| |        | Principal Financial Officer)    
| |        |                                 
| | Date:  | March 21, 2008                  

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket Number 2022 - CA -1290 Lawrence David Phillips, Jr. Versus - - 

### Exxon Chemical Louisiana, LLC and/or Exxon Chemical Americas, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Taylor-Seidenbach, 

### Inc., The McCartyCorporation, Anco Insulation, Inc., Ingersoll Rand Company, AMEC Foster Wheeler Constructors, Inc., Resco Holdings, LLC, as Success

On Application for 

### Rehearing 19th Judicial District Court Case #: 691676 East Baton Rouge Parish



### eating filed gp 07/07/2023 By Lawrence David Phillips, Jr.

# 2 ohn MAael ry Elizabeth Wolfe Steven M. Miller 

# JUL 2 0 2023
#### Charles PERRINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50250.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 3, 1995.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SoftBrands, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ George H. Ellis                                                                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| George H. Ellis*Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*  May 16, 2005              |
|                                                                                  |
| /s/ David G. Latzke                                                                   |   |
| David G. Latzke*Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*  May 16, 2005 |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5867 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5867

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, as the ``Colonel 
          Joseph William Kittinger II Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2023

 Mr. Mills (for himself, Mr. Posey, Mr. Mast, and Mr. Bean of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, as the ``Colonel 
          Joseph William Kittinger II Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL JOSEPH WILLIAM KITTINGER II POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Colonel Joseph William Kittinger II Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
Joseph William Kittinger II Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued July 23 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO . 01
- 13
- 00464
- CV

——————————— IN RE ANDRE LAMOND MORGAN , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Andre Lamond Morgan f iled a petition for writ of mandamus 1 complaining that Respondent, the Honorable Wesley R. Ward, failed to rule on Relator’s motion for default judgment.

1 The underlying case is Andre L. Morgan v. Rosario Stornello , No. 2012

- 69630, from the 2 34th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Wesley Ward, presiding.2 To b e entitled to mandamus relief, the r elator must establish both that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud icial Dist. Court of Appeals , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) . If the r elator fails to meet either of these requirements, then the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See id. I t is the relator’s burden to properly re quest and show entitlement to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The district clerk’s records indicate that Relator’s civil suit was dismissed for want of prosecution on May 7, 2013. The May 7, 2013 dis missal is an appealable final judgment. Relator has an adequate remedy at law because he could have challenged Respondent’s failure to grant his motion for default judgment on appeal. See Aguilar v. Livingston , 154 S.W.3d 832, 833 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14t h Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (although denial of motion for default judgment is interlocutory order not subject to appeal, a ppellate courts may consider issue when denial is challenged in appeal from final judgment). Accordingly, Relator’ s petition for writ of mandamus is denied

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Massengale

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001103721
<NAME>                        Pizza Group, Inc. #1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         4,850
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,850
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       565
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,850
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,650)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>