alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11500]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,743, 743A]


Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance; R.D. Simpson, Incorporated (including D&E 
Laundry) Cartersville, GA and Zena Enterprises, New York, NY

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on January 23, 1996, applicable 
to all workers of R.D. Simpson, Incorporated (including D&E Laundry) 
Located in Cartersville, Georgia. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on February 6, 1996 (FR 4486).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers at the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations have occurred at Zena Enterprises, an affiliate of 
the subject firm, located in New York, New York. The company reports 
that workers at Zena provide services in support of the production of 
jeans by the subject firm in Cartersville, Georgia.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports of jeans. Accordingly, the Department is amending the 
certification for workers of the subject firm to include all workers of 
Zena Enterprises in New York, New York.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,743 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of workers of R.D. Simpson, Incorporated (including 
D&E Laundry), Cartersville, Georgia (TA-W-31,743), and Zena 
Enterprises, New York, New York (TA-W-31,743A) who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after December 4, 1994 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-11500 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Israel Marrero, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Fritz Alexander, J., at plea; Brenda Soloff, J., at sentence), rendered on or about December 2, 1986, convicting defendant, after his guilty plea, of assault in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 2 *Vi*to 7 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of from 2 to 6 years, and except as thus modified, affirmed.

On June 9, 1981, defendant drove his car into Ms. Laughlin, who suffered substantial injuries as a result of the accident. Defendant fled the scene but was subsequently arrested; he appeared to be intoxicated. After discussing the case with his attorney, defendant entered a guilty plea. At the plea proceeding, the court promised to impose a prison sentence of no more than 1 to 3 years. The court further stated that if defendant, who was at liberty pending sentence, was involved in a drunken driving charge between the date of the plea and sentencing, he would be sentenced to 2 to 6 years. Defendant responded that he understood. Between the date of his plea and sentencing, defendant was arrested twice for crimes involving drunken driving. Defendant did not appear for sentence, as originally scheduled, and had to be returned on a *420warrant. The sentencing court imposed an indeterminate prison sentence of from *2 Vs*to 7 years. We modify to conform the sentence to the promise and otherwise affirm.

Defendant claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because of numerous alleged omissions and errors by his attorney. While a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction is not normally the appropriate procedural mechanism for such a claim *(see, People v Jones,*55 NY2d 771, 773), the record sufficiently demonstrates that defendant’s attorney provided competent and effective representation. *(See, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147.)

Defendant also claims that he does not speak English, that he did not understand the rights he waived at the plea proceeding and that his plea should therefore be vacated. This claim is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to address it. Were we, however, to review the claim, we nonetheless would affirm. Defendant’s assertion that he does not understand English is belied by the record; indeed, it is clear that he understood the rights he was waiving. Thus, the conviction should be affirmed.

Since, however, the sentencing court failed to adhere to the plea-taking court’s promise, we modify the sentence to conform to the promise. A sentence of 2 to 6 years is more than justified given the serious nature of the crime and in light of defendant’s two subsequent arrests for drunk driving crimes after his license had been revoked. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
NUMBER 13-10-00646-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JESUS D. CANTU, Appellant,

v.

FRED G. ESQUIVEL, II, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This case is before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties have reached an 

agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to 

agreement, the parties request this Court to set aside the trial court=s judgment without 
2

regards to the merits, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in 

accordance with the agreement of the parties. 

The Court has considered the motion and it is the Court=s opinion that the motion 

should be granted in part and denied in part.1 The joint motion to set aside and remand 

is GRANTED. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court=s judgment without regard to the 

merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance 

with the parties= agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 

Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent 

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

10th day of March, 2011. 

 

1

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) permits the appellate court to dispose of an appeal in 

accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). This joint motion requests dismissal of the appeal and remand for entry of further orders 

by the trial court in accordance with the settlement. While this Court may dismiss an appeal pursuant to an 

agreement by the parties, we are not permitted to dismiss and remand for further proceedings. See id., 

42.1(a)(2)(B).
Case 2:17-cr-01424-SPL Document 2 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cr-01424-SPL Document 2 Filed 09/18/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-cr-01424-SPL Document 2 Filed 09/18/17 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gregory MONTGOMERY, Appellant. Gregory MONTGOMERY, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64283, 67939.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Jan. 9, 1996.

Douglas R. Hoff, Office of the Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, *for*respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions by a jury of burglary in the second degree, felony stealing and possession of burglary tools, and his sentencing as a prior, persistent and Class X offender by the court to fifteen year consecutive imprisonments on the first two charges and ten years concurrent imprisonment on the last charge. He also appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following a hearing. No error of law appears, the convictions are supported by the evidence, the findings of fact supporting denial of the Rule 29.15 motion are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgments of conviction affirmed; judgment denying Rule 29.15 motion affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
#### Lorena Fay OVERFIELD, Appellant, v. Jack Lahue MAHURIN, Respondents.

No. WD 50329.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 9, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 28, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied June 25, 1996.

Fay Overfield, Kansas City, pro se.

Michael J. Albano, John W. Dennis, Jr., Welch, Martin, Albano & Manners, Independence, for Respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and SHANGLER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal concerns maintenance and distribution of property, the terms of which were already covered in a 1988 decree which had been affirmed on appeal. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Leo Brunnick Commuting Expense Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 

 
 September 20, 2006 
 Mr. Leo Brunnick 
 Senior Vice President of Research and Development 
 907 Baltimore 
 El Paso, Texas 79902 
 Dear Leo: 
 This letter sets forth the details of Vignette’s agreement to provide you with financial assistance regarding your commuting
expenses beginning from the time of your move from Austin to El Paso on August 7, 2006 and continuing until 12/31/2006 (the Covered Period). 
 Vignette
agrees to reimburse you for your actual and reasonable commuting expenses during the Covered Period up to a maximum of $13,500.00 in expenses. Relocation related expenses are specifically excluded. Vignette will also gross up the amount paid in
expenses to cover income taxes due on the payments. You will be required to submit individual commuting expense reports for each trip. All expenses are subject to the usual Vignette Travel policy and will include coach airfare or mileage,
accommodation, meals and transportation. 
 As we have discussed, your primary work location remains Austin so it is our expectation that you will maximize
your presence in the Austin office during normal work hours except for when you are traveling on business. 
 Please sign below indicating your agreement to
the terms of this letter. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	


	Michael A. Aviles
	President and CEO
	Vignette Corporation

  

	
	


	Leo Brunnick

 1301 South MoPac Expressway, Suite 100 : Austin, TX 78746 
 Toll-free: 1.888.608.9900 : Fax: 1.512.741.1403 
 www.vignette.com
#### In the Interest of R.W., a Juvenile. Appeal of DIVISION of FAMILY SERVICES.

No. 57069.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 1, 1990.

Mona Cross, St. Louis, for appellant.

Donna L. Head, Patricia Woodson Shaw, St. Louis, William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Lisa Mayer, Mary Stewart Tansey, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, Margaret Ellen Gangle, St. Louis, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Division of Family Services (DFS) appeals an order of the juvenile court placing legal custody of R.W. with DFS. We affirm. The judgment of the juvenile court reviewable under Rule 73.01 is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no precedential value and the order is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**ORDER GRANTING THIRT Y**  **- DAY EXTENSION**  **PAGE 1**  **OF 1**  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREMEN COURT HELENA, MONTANA 59620

- 3003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21

- 0011

IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF H.D.K., A Protected Person. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EX TENSION OF TIME

Having read Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time, finding no objection, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered Appellant is granted a thirty

- day extension to file his opening brief calculated from Ma rch 26, 2021.
Signed this _____ day of March 2021.

______________________________ Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 18 2021

03/18/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0011
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

and Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427



I, Martin Thorp, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Four Rivers BioEnergy Inc., for the quarter ended July 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial reporting the occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                         |                                                                   
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 16, 2008 | /s/ Martin Thorp                                                  
|                         | Martin Thorp
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21504-21505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11809]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: The Provision for the Delivery of Legal Services 
Committee of the Legal Services Corporation's Board of Directors will 
meet on May 19, 1996. The meeting will begin at 2:00 p.m. and continue 
until conclusion of the committee's agenda.

LOCATION: Legal Services Corporation, 750 First Street NE, 11th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20002, (202) 336-8800.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Approval of Agenda.
    2. Consider and act on recommendtion for Board action on a 
suggested list of priorities that grantee boards may use in setting 
local priorities.
    3. Report by the OIG on its plans for implementation of Section 509 
of Pub. L. 104-134 (H.R. 3019).
    4. Report by the Directors of OPEAR and OPS on the Corporation's 
implementation of competitive grantmaking in '96 and plans for '97, and 
other initiatives.
    5. Provide direction to staff with respect to publication of a 
draft revised Accounting Guide for Recipients and Auditors in the 
Federal Register for public comment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel, 
(202) 336-8800.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an

[[Page 21505]]

accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Barbara Asante, at (202) 
336-8800.

    Dated: May 7, 1996.
Victor M. Fortuno,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-11809 Filed 5-8-96; 12:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Fit For Business International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark A. Poulsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
          2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ending March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fit For
          Business International, Inc.

Dated:  November 24, 2006

/s/ Mark A. Poulsen
-------------------
Mark A. Poulsen
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  April 14, 2007



DON WILSONDon Wilson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)











---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1249]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service


BS-3A Caernarvon Diversion Outfall Management Project, 
Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of a finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Guidelines (40 
CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Guidelines (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
Environmental Impact Statement is not being prepared for the Caernarvon 
Diversion Outfall Management Project, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald W. Gohmert, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 3737 
Government Street, Alexandria, Louisiana 71302; telephone number (318) 
473-7751.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of the 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Donald W. Gohmert, State Conservationist, 
has determined that the preparation and review of an Environmental 
Impact Statement is not needed for this project.
    This project proposes to improve the utilization of fresh water, 
sediments, and nutrients from the Mississippi River, via the Caernarvon 
Diversion Structure, on approximately 23,800 acres of intermediate 
marsh in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. Project measures include the 
construction of variable-crested weirs, earthen plugs, flow-thru 
culverts, and 12,000 feet of spoil bank maintenance.
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
federal, state, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy 
requests at the above address. Basic data developed during the 
environmental assessment are on file and may be reviewed by contacting 
Donald W. Gohmert.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.
Donald W. Gohmert,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 96-1249 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the annual report of Spare Backup, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Cery Perle, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

April 14, 2008                   /s/ Cery Perle
                                 --------------
                                 Cery Perle, Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                 principal financial and accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.