alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Waterhouse, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered October 29, 1987, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ JOHN B. CONNALLY, III


___________________________


John B. Connally III, President and C.E.O.


(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  January 24, 2011








Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/S/ DAVID POMERANTZ


__________________________


David Pomerantz


Principal Financial Officer and


Principal Accounting Officer





Dated:  January 24, 2011
**C H**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0 412 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS JOE ELLSWORTH ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 4 , 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 27 2022

07/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0412
Amendment No. 4 to the Rotech Healthcare Inc. Common Stock Option Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE 
 ROTECH HEALTHCARE INC. 
 COMMON STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Rotech Healthcare Inc. (the “Company”) has established and maintains the Rotech Healthcare Inc. Common Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) may at any time amend the Plan,
subject to certain limitations; 
 WHEREAS, the Board deems it to be in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to revise
the provisions regarding acceleration upon a Change in Control; 
 WHEREAS, on November 6, 2006, the Board approved such
amendment to the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of November 6, 2006, as follows: 

FIRST: Subsection 5(a)(iv) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence of said subsection and substituting the following in lieu
thereof: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, in its sole discretion, the Board shall be entitled to determine the vesting schedule with
respect to any Option granted pursuant to the Plan and set forth in the Option Agreement, and the Board shall be entitled to substitute a more accelerated vesting schedule at any time for any Participant.” 
 SECOND: Except to the extent hereinabove set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect without change or modification. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of the foregoing, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 4 to be executed by a duly
authorized officer this      day of             , 2006. 
  

			
	ROTECH HEALTHCARE INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

**TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC (Georgia)**

**TRX Technology Services, L.P. (Georgia)**

**TRX Data Services, Inc. (Virginia)**

**Technology Licensing Company, LLC (Georgia)**

**Travel Technology, LLC (Georgia)**

**TRX Luxembourg, S.á.r.l. (Luxembourg)**

**TRX UK, Ltd. (England and Wales)**

**TRX Europe, Ltd. (England and Wales)**

**         f/k/a eTRX, Ltd. d/b/a TRX Europe f/k/a Fortdove, Ltd**

**TRX Germany GmbH (Germany)**

**TRXTechnologies India Private Limited (India)**
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for Q2Power Technologies, Inc., (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Christopher Nelson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michelle Murcia, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: February 15, 2017  By:/s/Christopher Nelson Christopher Nelson Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)   By:/s/Michelle Murcia Michelle Murcia Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

HILDA CID, RESPONDNET

v.

ERIE INSURANCE GROUP AKA ERIE 

INSURANCE EXCHANGE A/K/A ERIE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 17 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

The Boeing Company ) ASBCA No. 59582 

) 

Under Contract No. N00019-07-C-0035 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. 

Seth H. Locke, Esq. 

Perkins Coie LLP 

Washington, DC 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. 

Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 14 July 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59582, Appeal of The Boeing 

Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11693]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-224-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

May 6, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1996, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A 
attached to the filing, proposed to be effective June 1, 1996.
    Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing is to provide 
Panhandle's firm shippers under Rate Schedules FT, EFT and LFT with a 
customized reservation rate that will allow them maximum flexibility in 
dealing with market conditions throughout the contract year. The 
Customized Reservation Pattern (CRP) election will allow a firm shipper 
to shift, during each twelve month period commencing November 1, up to 
80% of the reservation charge obligation for the April to October 
period into the preceding November to March period. By permitting a 
shipper to customize its cost-based reservation charges, CRP will raise 
or lower the maximum monthly charge to better reflect conditions in its 
own markets and to the secondary market for capacity release. This will 
further the Commission's goals of allocating capacity to those shippers 
who value it most and permit shippers to contract for services at rates 
which are designed to market gas and services competitively.
    Panhandle states that a copy of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11693 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2148

___________ George L. Fuller, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Paul K. Delo, Superintendent; * District Court for the Unknown Harris, Major; Unknown * Eastern District of Missouri. Nichols, Captain; Unknown * Underwood, Sgt.; Unknown Bergner, * [UNPUBLISHED] CO I; Unknown Kohut, Sgt.; Unknown * Gregor, Sgt.; Unknown Gibson, CO I; * Unknown Allen, CO I; Unknown * Brown, CO I; Unknown Cayabyab, * Dr.; Cathy Stewart; Deannal Hutchins; * Nancy Times; Desiray Cracker; * Unknown Conway, Sgt.; Unknown * Hensen, CO I; Ron Harris, Employee * at P.C.C., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 15, 1998 Filed: May 21, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARDARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________The Honorable Frederick R. Buckles, United States Magistrate Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Missouri, to whom case was referred for final dis position by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2- PER CURIAM. George L . Fuller, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the District Court’s orde r 1 dis missing some defendants, and granting summary judgment for the remainin g defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) suit. Fuller also appeals the denial of hi s Federal Rule C ivil Procedure 60(b) motion. After consideration of our jurisdiction of this appeal, we conclude this appeal was timely filed, and deny appellees’ motion t o dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ submissions, we deny Fuller’s pending motions, and conclude that the District Court did notcommit error in its order dismissing and granting summary judgment for th e reasons it stated. We further conclude the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Fulle

r’s Rule 60(b) motion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

The Board of Directorsand StockholdersThe SCO Group, Inc.:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-43822, 333-97865,and 333-100105 on Form S-8 of The SCO Group, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 18, 2005, except as to note 16, which is as of March 11, 2005, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of The SCO Group, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of October 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity,and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31,2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in theOctober 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of The SCOGroup, Inc.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------------|--------|

 

Salt Lake City, UtahMarch 31, 2005

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Holding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph R. Wright, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|Date: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/JOSEPH R. WRIGHTJoseph R. Wright
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.1


OUTDOOR
CHANNEL HOLDINGS, INC.


AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment is made effective as of November 9,
2006, by and between Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), and Roger
L. Werner, Jr. (the “Executive”).  Unless
otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have
the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement dated October 16, 2006.


WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company entered into a
Employment Agreement dated October 16, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company hereby desire
to amend the Employment Agreement in the manner described below.


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recitals and the respective covenants and
agreements of the parties contained in this document, the Company and the
Executive agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


1.             The
second sentence of Section 1(a) shall be amended to read as follows:


“Thereafter,
Executive will also be appointed to the position of the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer effective as of the date immediately following the date the
Company has filed its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending on September 30, 2006.”


2.             To
the extent not expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in full
force and effect.


3.             This
Amendment and the Employment Agreement represent the entire agreement and
understanding between the Company and Executive concerning Executive’s
employment relationship with the Company, and supersede and replace any and all
prior agreements and understandings concerning Executive’s employment
relationship with the Company.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been entered
into as of the date first set forth above.


	
  EXECUTIVE:

  	
   

  	
  OUTDOOR CHANNEL HOLDINGS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Roger L. Werner, Jr.

  	
   

  	
  /s/ William A. Owen

  
	
  Roger L. Werner, Jr.

  	
   

  	
  By: William A. Owen, CFO
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11656]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    In accordance with Department of Justice policy, 28 C.F.R. 50.7, 
notice is hereby given that a proposed Final (Consent) Judgment in 
United States v. Seminole Fertilizer Corp., Case No. 96-735-CIV-T-24B 
(M.D. Fla.), was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
Middle District of Florida on April 15, 1996.
    The proposed Final (Consent) Judgment concerns alleged violations 
of section 301(a) and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and 
1344. Specifically, Defendant Seminole Fertilizer Corporation exceeded 
the terms of a permit issued by the Corps of Engineers under Clean 
Water Act section 404 in connection with Seminole's phosphate mining 
operations. As a result of the alleged violation, fill material was 
unlawfully discharged into approximately 15.0 unpermitted acres of 
wetlands. The proposed Final (Consent) Judgment would require Seminole 
Fertilizer Corporation to complete an on-site mitigation project and to 
pay a $40,000 civil penalty.
    The United States Attorney's Office will receive written comments 
relating to the proposed Final (Consent) Judgment for a period of 30 
days from the date of publication of this notice. Comments should be 
addressed to Michael A. Cauley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Middle 
District of Florida, 500 Zack Street, Room 400, Tampa, FL 33602, and 
should refer to United States v. Seminole Fertilizer Corp., Case No. 
96-735-CIV-T-24B (M.D. Fla.).
    The Complaint and proposed Final (Consent) Judgment in this case 
may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for 
the Middle District of Florida, 611 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, 
Florida 33602.
Letitia J. Grishaw,
Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environmental & Natural Resources 
Division.
[FR Doc. 96-11656 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CANAM URANIUM
      CORP.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Canam
      Uranium Corp., for the quarter ended January 31, 2007, the undersigned, Ryan
      Gibson, Chief Executive Officer of Canam Uranium Corp., does hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended January 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Canam Uranium Corp.




Date:
              March 27, 2007
            
            /s/
              Ryan
              GibsonRyan
              GibsonPresident
              and
              Chief Executive Officer
#### Edward TAYLOR, Respondent, v. NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES, Appellant.

No. 62255.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

March 9, 1993.

Robert Hines, Columbia, for respondent.

Douglas Van Camp, James Kelly Pool, Donald Otto, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Before CARL R. GAERTNER, P.J., and SIMON and CRAHAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of compensation by an Administrative Law Judge under the Workers’ Compensation Act. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

This judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b)(4).
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Luc Vanhal, the Chief Financial Officer of Caleco Pharma
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        | /s/
      Luc Vanhal   
| | Name:  | LUC VANHAL             
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | June
      14, 2010    



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---