alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19-0389
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. JOSEPH WAYNE WATERS,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILED SEP 08 2020
Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Rolontana ORDER

Counsel for the Appellant Joseph Wayne Waters filed a motion and briefasking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal,pursuant to § 46-8-103(2),MCA,and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Waters was granted time to file a response,but no response was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in Waters'appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to Waters personally. 9-2_ DATED this T

' day ofSeptember, 2020.

ChiefJustice 09/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-03892 

# A.

/ toi(•,;), Justices
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Holding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph R. Wright, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | /s/JOSEPH R. WRIGHTJoseph R. Wright Chief Executive
Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Bettye Felder, :

:

Plaintiff, :

v. : Civil Action No. 13-0271 (CKK)

:

Corrections Corporation : 

of America, :

:

Defendant. : 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 4]. After granting plaintiff’s motions 

for time to retain counsel to oppose the motion, the Court on September 3, 2013, gave plaintiff 

until October 1, 2013, to file her response to defendant’s motion with or without counsel. 

Plaintiff was informed that since she was allowed approximately five months to retain counsel 

and file a response, she would be granted no more extensions of time without demonstrating 

extraordinary circumstances. Sept. 3, 2013 Min. Order. Counsel has not appeared in the case on 

plaintiff’s behalf, and plaintiff has not filed a response to defendant’s motion. 

Defendant Corrections Corporation of America (“CCA”) argues essentially that plaintiff 

has named the wrong defendant for the claims stemming from her medical care at the District’s 

Correctional Treatment Facility because CCA has contracted with the District to provide security 

services, not medical care. See Mot. at 3-5. Defendant further argues that the complaint fails to 

implicate CCA or CCA employees in any misconduct. Id. at 4. Since plaintiff has not contested 

these valid arguments, the Court will grant defendant’s motion and will dismiss the case for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Hopkins v. Women's Div., General 
2

Bd. of Global Ministries, 284 F. Supp. 2d 15, 25 (D.D.C. 2003), aff'd 98 Fed.Appx. 8 (D.C. Cir.

2004) (“It is well understood in this Circuit that . . . a court may treat [unopposed] arguments [in 

a dispositive motion] . . . as conceded.”) (citing FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C. Cir.

1997) (other citation omitted). A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

__________s/s__________________

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

DATE: October 15, 2013 United States District Judge
the strother law firm 

4306 yoakum blvd., suite 560 

houston, texas 77006 

telephone: 713-557-9238 

mstrother@strotherlawfirm.com 

December 21, 2015 

Hon. Christopher A. Prine 

Clerk of the Court 

First Court of Appeals 

VIA E-FILING 

RE: Cause No. 2012-23983; The Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC vs. 

MarineCorp International, Ltd.; In the 801h Judicial District Court of Harris 

County, Texas 

RE: Court of Appeals Cause Number O1-14-00707-CV 

Dear Clerk: 

Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced cause of action is Marinecorp International, 

Ltd.'s Reply Brief for Appellant. 

Your prompt and kind attention hereto will be greatly appreciated. 

Yours truly, 

1 / 

MACON D. STROTHER 

MDS/kmc 

Enclosures 

cc: Brock Akers 

via email bca@akersfirm.com 

cc: Steve Cochell 

via email srcochell@gmail.com 

cc: Lee Harless and Dawn Marie Harless 

11435 Log Cabin Dr. 

Tomball, TX 77375 

via CM/RRR 7014 0510 0000 0079 5016 

Page I 1 

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/21/2015 3:48:55 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-12-01124-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1243459

Style: Casey Demon Carmon

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: November 7, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Supplemental Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 7, 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 0

Date Requested: November 14, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: November 14, 2014

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp

Date: November 10, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 400 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 50
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 400

                          [Report No. 111-96]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend the Truth 
   in Lending Act to reform consumer mortgage practices and provide 
accountability for such practices, to provide certain minimum standards 
          for consumer mortgage loans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2009

    Ms. Pingree of Maine, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend the Truth 
   in Lending Act to reform consumer mortgage practices and provide 
accountability for such practices, to provide certain minimum standards 
          for consumer mortgage loans, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution 
the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the 
House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend the Truth 
in Lending Act to reform consumer mortgage practices and provide 
accountability for such practices, to provide certain minimum standards 
for consumer mortgage loans, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 
9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. 
After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall rise without 
motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order except 
pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
                                                  House Calendar No. 50

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 400

                          [Report No. 111-96]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1728) to amend the Truth 
   in Lending Act to reform consumer mortgage practices and provide 
accountability for such practices, to provide certain minimum standards 
          for consumer mortgage loans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 5, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

Barbara Ann Dominey, Individually, and as Trustee of the Dominey Exempt Bypass Trust, the Dominey Non

- Exempt Bypass Trust, the Dominey 2012 Irrevocable Trust f/b/o Elena Marquarita Dominey Langston, Teresa Eddinger, and Allison Allen, co

trustees of the Dominey Insurance Trust of 1993, and Estate of Samuel Dominey Jr.

,

Appellant s
,

v.

El ena Marquarita Dominey Langston, Florence Olivia Dominey Campbell, and Matthew David Dominey, Beneficiaries of the Dominey 2012 Irrevocable Trust, the Dominey Exempt Bypass Trust, the Dominey Non

- Exempt Bypass Trust, and the Dominey Insurance Trusts of 199 3

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 21

- 00 187

- C V

Appeal from the

278 th District Court

of Walker C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2130121 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Appellants’ unopposed motion for extension of deadline to

mediate. The motion is GRANTED. The Court extends the deadline to complete mediation until

February 1, 2022

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MEDIATE THE

CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT. Upon completion of mediation, the parties

are directed to comply with the instructions set forth in our order of October 25, 2021

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8 th da y of November , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 22a0414n.06

No. 22-1114

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

FADI ABI FAKHREDDINE and OLD JOY 

INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

ERIC SABREE,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

MICHIGAN

OPINION

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; BOGGS and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Fadi Abi Fakhreddine appeals the district court’s dismissal of his takings 

claims under the U.S. Constitution against Wayne County and its Treasurer, Eric Sabree. For the 

reasons stated in Hall v. Meisner, No. 21-1700, slip op. (6th Cir. Oct. 13, 2022), we reverse the 

district court’s dismissal and remand with instruction to proceed in accordance with that decision.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 97-50300

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANDRE LEVERT POLK, also known as Milton

Johnson, also known as Andre Polk,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(M0-96-CR-135-2)

February 17, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andre Levert Polk appeals his sentence following conviction

for aiding and abetting and conspiracy to commit fraud and related

activity in connection with access devices (credit card fraud). He

contends the district court erroneously applied the sentencing

guidelines in determining his sentence and ordered an excessive

amount of restitution. We conclude that the court did not abuse
-2-

its discretion in applying § 5K2.3 to depart upwardly from the

guidelines on the basis of psychological injury. See United States

v. Wells, 101 F.3d 370 (5th Cir. 1996). Furthermore, the district

court’s findings regarding the amount of loss attributed to Polk

for purposes of establishing his offense level under § 2F1.1 were

not clearly erroneous. See U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, comment. (n.8);

United States v. Krenning, 93 F.3d 1257, 1269 (5th Cir. 1996).

With regard to his other claims of error in sentencing, Polk has

failed to show plain error in the district court’s sentencing

determinations, to which he did not object below. See United

States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

Finally, Polk has failed to demonstrate abuse of discretion with

respect to the district court’s order of restitution. See United

States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 398-99 (5th Cir. 1996); United

States v. Aubin, 87 F.3d 141, 150 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied,

___U.S.___, 117 S. Ct. 965, 136 L. Ed. 2d 850 (1997).

AFFIRMED.
#### Alfred COOPER, et al., Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF BEL RIDGE, et al. Respondents.

No. 68887.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 10, 1996.

Harvey I. Feldman, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Robert J. Rrehbiel, Adrian P. Sulser, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Alfred W. Cooper, d/b/a Al Cooper’s Salon, and his wife Patricia A. Cooper appeal from a judgment in favor of The Village of Bel *178Ridge following the grant of a motion for directed verdict at close of Coopers’ case. Village’s motion to dismiss appeal is denied.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
                        Certified Public Accountant


1582 TULITA DRIVE                           OFFICE (702) 361-8414
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89123                    FAX NO. (702) 896-0278


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Whom It May Concern:
                                                          January 2, 2001

     The  firm  of  Barry  L. Friedman, P.C., Certified  Public  Accountant
consents  to  the inclusion of their report of  January 2,  2001,  on  the
Financial Statements of Your Domain. Com, as of December 31, 2000, in
any filings  that are  necessary  now  or  in the near future with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,

/s/ Barry L. Friedman

Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12313]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-233-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 10, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 6, 1996, Northern Border Pipeline Company 
(Northern Border) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective June 5, 1996:

Cover Page
Second Revised Sheet Number 236
Sixth Revised Sheet Number 500
Ninth Revised Sheet Number 501

    Northern Border states that the purpose of this filing is to 
conform Northern Border's tariff to the requirements of Order Nos. 581 
and 582. In accordance with Order No. 581, Northern Border is in 
compliance with the Commission's EBB posting requirements. In 
accordance with Order No. 582, Northern Border has modified the title 
page of its tariff as required by 18 CFR 154.102(d) and updated 
references to Part 154 of the Commission's Regulations.
    Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been sent to 
all of Northern Border's contracted shippers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Section 385.214 and Section 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12313 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marlon TOLLIVER, Defendant-Appellant. Marlon TOLLIVER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Nos. 67685, 69856.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 10, 1996.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marlon Tolliver (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years’ imprisonment and from the denial without hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Case 4:17-cr-01620-RCC-DTF Document 1 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:17-cr-01620-RCC-DTF Document 1 Filed 10/18/17 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:17-cr-08270-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:17-cr-08270-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:17-cr-08270-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:17-cr-08270-JJT Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 4 of 4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

EDWARD T. EGAN, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

RACHEL MCGRAW EGAN, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 812 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

 

EDWARD T. EGAN, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

RACHAEL MCGRAW EGAN, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 813 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Lynn M. Pachunka, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Hartford Life and Accident Insurance 

Company, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-03969-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 The Court has been advised that this case has settled (Doc. 28). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter will, without further Order of 

this Court, be dismissed with prejudice within 30 days of the date of this Order unless a 

stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating any pending hearings. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying all pending motions as moot. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this 

matter on April 25, 2018 without further leave of Court. 

 Dated this 26th day of March, 2018. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:17-cv-03969-GMS Document 29 Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 410 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 410

  Recognizing the numerous contributions of the recreational boating 
  community and the boating industry to the continuing prosperity and 
                    affluence of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2009

  Mr. Klein of Florida (for himself, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, Mr. 
     Taylor, and Mrs. Miller of Michigan) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the numerous contributions of the recreational boating 
  community and the boating industry to the continuing prosperity and 
                    affluence of the United States.

Whereas the boating community in the United States includes over 59,000,000 
        individuals, generates more than $33,000,000,000 annually in the United 
        States economy, and provides jobs for 337,000 citizens of the United 
        States who earn wages totaling $10,400,000,000 annually;
Whereas boaters often serve as stewards of the marine environment of the United 
        States, educating future generations of the value of these resources, 
        and preserving such resources for such generations' enjoyment;
Whereas there are approximately 1,400 active boat builders in the United States, 
        using materials and services contributed from all 50 States;
Whereas boating, as an activity, provides opportunities for families to be 
        together, appeals to all age groups, and has a beneficial effect on the 
        physical fitness and scholastic performance of those who participate; 
        and
Whereas, July 1, 2009, would be an appropriate day to establish as National 
        Boating Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the recreational boating community and the boating 
        industry of the United States should be commended for their 
        numerous contributions to the economy of the United States, the 
        well-being of United States citizens, and responsible 
        environmental stewardship of the marine resources of the United 
        States; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling on 
        the people of the United States to observe National Boating Day 
        with appropriate programs and activities that emphasize family 
        involvement and provide an opportunity to promote the boating 
        industry.
                                 <all>
```