alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 24875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12571]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 1996 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 24875]]

                Memorandum of April 26, 1996

                
Suspension of Subsection 119(a) of the Department 
                of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations 
                Act, 1996, (``Act'') as set forth in Section 101(c) of 
                Title I of the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and 
                Appropriations Act of 1996 (H.R. 3019) Regarding the 
                Mojave National Preserve

                Memorandum for the Secretary of the Interior

                By the authority vested in me by subsection 119(b) of 
                the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
                Appropriations Act, 1996, (``Act'') as set forth in 
                section 101(c) of title I of the Omnibus Consolidated 
                Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 (H.R. 3019), 
                and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I 
                hereby suspend subsection 119(a) of the Act because I 
                have determined that such suspension is appropriate 
                based upon the public interest in sound environmental 
                management, sustainable resource use, protection of 
                national or locally-affected interests, and protection 
                of cultural, biological, or historic resources.

                This suspension shall take effect immediately and shall 
                continue until subsection 119(a) expires.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                suspension to the Congress and to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 26, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96-12571
Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4310-70-M
Order entered October 9 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00856
- CR
EX PARTE ALEJANDRO T OVAR On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 11

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MC 13
- A1095



### O RDER
On Ju ly 18, 2013, this Court received a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order on appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. The reporter’s record reflects that at the conclusion of the March 22, 2013 hearing, the trial court de nied appellant relief. However, the written order, also dated March 22, 2013, does not reflect the trial court’s ruling. Rather, the order has a section that says, “The motion is GRANTED/DENIED,” but neither ruling is marked. Accordingly, we ORDER the Ho norable Elizabeth Frizell, Presiding Judge of the County Criminal Court No. 10, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing an order that clearly reflects the trial court’s denial of the relief sought by appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Elizabeth Frizell, Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court No. 1; the Dallas CountyClerk’s Office, Criminal Records Divis ion; and Michael Casillas, Dallas County District

Attorney’s Office.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first

- class mail, to Alejandro Tovar, 1913 Pembroke Street, Irving, Texas 75060.

/s / KERRY P. FITZGERALD PRESIDING JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12673]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-145-001]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Cash-Out Report

May 15, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 10, 1996, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing, pursuant to Article 9.7(d) of the General 
Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, a revised report of net 
revenue received from cash-outs.
    WNG states that it submitted its original report of net revenue 
received from cash-outs for the period October 1, 1994 through 
September 30, 1995 on February 16, 1996 pursuant to Article 9.7(d) of 
the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff. By letter 
order issued April 10, 1996, the Commission accepted WNG's cash-out 
report pursuant to WNG increasing the principal refund amount by 
$73,233.95, plus the appropriate amount of interest. WNG states that 
the instant filing is being made to reflect this increase in refunds.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service list maintained by the Commission in the docket 
referenced above and on all jurisdictional customers and interested 
state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before May 22, 1996. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12673 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Derek Dewayne Davis, Appellant

No. 06-21-00078-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28657). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Derek Dewayne Davis, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 23, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
exv10w2x1yxdy



 





Exhibit 10.2(1)(d)




THIRD AMENDMENT

TO THE

BELO SAVINGS PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective August 1, 2004)




     Belo Corp., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to authorization by the Board of Directors,
adopts the following amendments to the Belo Savings Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of October 11,
2006.



     1. Section 1.8 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




     “Company Stock” means Series A Common Stock.



     2. The definition of Series B Common Stock set forth in Section 1.30 of the Plan is deleted
from the Plan.



     3. Subsection (c) of Section 3.6 of the Plan (“Investment of Contributions”) is amended in its
entirety to read as follows:




     Belo Stock Fund. As of October 11, 2006, the Belo Stock Fund will consist only
of Series A Common Stock.



     4. Subsection (b) of Section 4.4 of the Plan (“Allocation of Trust Fund Income and Loss”) is
amended in its entirety to read as follows:




     Method of Allocation. The share of net income or net loss of the Trust Fund to
be credited to, or deducted from, each Account will be the allocable portion of the net
income or net loss of the investment fund in which such Account, or any subaccount of such
Account, is invested as of each Valuation Date, as determined by the Committee in a uniform
and nondiscriminatory manner.



     Executed at Dallas, Texas, this 29th day of September, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	BELO CORP.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Marian Spitzberg
 	 
	 	 	Marian Spitzberg 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President/Human Resources
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-4690 

_____________________________ 

KEVIN J. LAPAGE, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. 

J. Scott Duncan, Judge. 

July 9, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Kevin J. LaPage, pro se, Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5755 

To repeal the Local Rent Supplement Program Eligibility Temporary 

Amendment Act of 2023. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2023 

Mr. GROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To repeal the Local Rent Supplement Program Eligibility 

Temporary Amendment Act of 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LOCAL RENT SUPPLEMENT PRO4 GRAM ELIGIBILITY TEMPORARY AMEND5 MENT ACT OF 2023. 

6 The Local Rent Supplement Program Eligibility 

7 Temporary Amendment Act of 2023 (D.C. Law L2–0057) 

8 is hereby repealed, and any provision of law amended or 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5755 IH

1 repealed by such Act is restored or revived as if such Act 

2 had not been enacted into law. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T FE LI PE DE J ES US HERNAN DEZP AD I L L A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J R ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 75291 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 850- 597 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d and S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r6, 2009 S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , C A N B Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P e t i t i one rF e l i pe de J e s us H e rnande z - P a di l l ape t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

the B o ardo f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s’ d en i al o f can cel l at i o n o f rem o v al . B ecau se P et i t i on er ’ s c as e i s i n al l re l evantw ay s i dent i ca l t o the pet i t i on er ’ s c as e i n N un ez R e y e s v. H ol de r , N o. 05- 75291, s l i p op. a t6053 ( 9th C i r . A pr . 23, 2010) , a nd i n the pe t i t i one r ’ s c a s e i n R i c e v. H ol de r , 597 F . 3d 952 ( 9th C i r . 2010) , w e gr antthe 

# FI LED APR27 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w an dr e m an df

o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d i n g s . As i n Nu n e z - R e y e s , we r e m a nd on an ope n r e c or d, a nd the gove rnm e nti s f r e e t o r a i s e a nya r gum e nt s not
r e j e c t e d i n tha topi ni on. P e t i t i o n GR AN T E D; c a s e R E MAND E D.
H. Res. 291 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 2, 2009. 

Whereas the brave men and women defending America’s democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan are in harms way; 

Whereas thousands of America’s returning veterans were seriously wounded in combat, including brain injuries, single and double amputations, and other traumatic wounds; 

Whereas these brave soldiers return to the United States and 

spend weeks, months, and years in hospitals recovering, 

and return to their homes needing assistance to regain 

their independence; 

Whereas these recovering soldiers who are teamed up with assistance dogs lead more comfortable and more independent lives; 

Whereas these dogs provide assistance to wounded veterans 

while walking, going up and down stairs, and getting up 

from a sitting or fallen position, and also pick up 

dropped articles, retrieve items from a distance, pull 

manual wheelchairs a short distance, turn lights on and 

off, and perform other important daily tasks; 

Whereas assistance animals offer priceless companionship 

and unconditional love on a daily basis; 

Whereas there are fewer than 75 veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan who currently have assistance dogs because 
2 

•HRES 291 EH 

they either cannot afford them or do not know about the 

benefits that assistance dogs provide; 

Whereas severely wounded veterans currently have to wait up 

to two years before they can receive an assistance animal; 

Whereas The Tower of Hope was created following the attacks of September 11, 2001, to bring hope to wounded 

veterans by providing them with assistance dogs at no 

cost; and 

Whereas The Tower of Hope has substantially improved 

many lives by raising funds for the training of assistance 

dogs, providing grants for American combat wounded veterans, and advocating for the benefits of these animals: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) acknowledges the importance of assistance dogs 

in helping combat-wounded veterans live happier and 

more independent lives; 

(2) applauds the outstanding work of The Tower of 

Hope and its dedication to training and providing assistance dogs to wounded veterans, as well as educating people about the benefits of such animals; 

(3) expresses deep gratitude and support to volunteers and donors who have made this great program possible by generously offering time and funds; 

(4) encourages the general public to support wounded veterans by volunteering or donating to help train assistance dogs; 
3 

•HRES 291 EH 

(5) calls for a vigorous promotion of, and advocacy 

for, the benefits of assistance animals for physicians and 

the general public; and 

(6) supports the goals and ideals of creating a 

Tower of Hope Day in honor of wounded American veterans and their service dogs, the work of The Tower of 

Hope, and the many generous donors. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
NUMBER 13-12-00586-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

MIGUEL MALDONADO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was due on August 14, 2014. Pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2), on August 19, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified 

appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been timely filed, requested counsel to file a 

response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days, and warned counsel that 
2

the Court would abate and remand this cause to the trial court for appropriate findings if 

a response was not filed. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or an 

appellate brief in this matter. 

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a 

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant 

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should 

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email 

address and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in the order appointing 

counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record 

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 
3

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

26th day of September, 2014.
#### Gerald W. BEREUTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65850.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 10, 1995.

*418Gerald W. Bereuter, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his “Motion to Correct Sentence by Order Nunc Pro Tunc”. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00022-CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF B.F.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 317th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-234,240

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 26, 2023, T.F. filed a notice of appeal in Trial Court Cause 

Number C-234,240. We questioned whether we had jurisdiction over the appeal, and 

we warned the appellant that we would dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction 

unless she filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. 

Subsequently, T.F. failed to file a response.1 We find that when T.F. filed the 

notice of appeal, she could not effectively invoke this Court’s appellate jurisdiction

1It is not clear what order, if any, T.F. wished to appeal. We have addressed 

appeals arising from Trial Court Cause Number C-234,240 on two prior occasions. 

In 2020, we affirmed an order terminating T.F.’s parental rights to her minor child, 
2

over Trial Court Cause Number C-234,240.

2 Additionally, the appellant failed to 

comply with the notice from the Clerk which required her to file a response to the 

notice the Court sent to her by February 21 sufficient to show the grounds that 

justified continuing her appeal.3

T.F. failed to file a timely notice of appeal and failed to comply with the notice 

from the Clerk. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.4

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on March 29, 2023

Opinion Delivered March 30, 2023

Before Horton,Johnson and Wright, JJ.

B.F. See In re B.F., No. 09-20-00154-CV, 2020 WL 66600961 (Tex. App.—

Beaumont Nov. 12, 2020, no pet.). In 2022 we dismissed T.F.’s attempted appeal 

from an order dismissing Trial Court Cause Number C-234,240. See In re B.F., No. 

09-22-00220-CV, 2022 WL 3651990 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 25, 2022, no 

pet.). The notice of appeal T.F. filed in 2023 did not identify an order from which 

her notice of appeal would have been timely, and it did not identify an order from 

which she would have had standing to appeal since the trial court had previously 

signed an order terminating her parental rights. 2See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1; see also id. 42.3(a).

3See id. 42.3(c).

4See id. 42.3(a), (c), 43.2(f).
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ JOHN B. CONNALLY, III


John B. Connally III, President and C.E.O.


(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  April 14, 2011
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anthony IVY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 58271.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 3, 1994.

John A. Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Anthony Ivy, appeals from his judgment of convictions.

This is the second appeal in this case. In the previous appeal, we remanded the case for a hearing to determine whether the state was guilty of racial discrimination in its use of its peremptory challenges during the jury selection process under *Batson v. Kentucky,*476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The trial court was also directed to correct a clerical mistake in the judgment. In all other respects, the judgment of convictions were affirmed. The trial court’s dismissal of defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion was also affirmed. *State v. Ivy,*851 S.W.2d 71 (Mo.App.E.D.1993).

We have reviewed the record in this appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Fit For Business International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sandra Wendt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
          2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ending March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fit For
          Business International, Inc.

Dated:  November 24, 2006

/s/ Sandra Wendt
----------------
Sandra Wendt
Chief Financial Officer