alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Paula K. MUEHLING and John W. Muehling, Plaintiffs-Appellants. and Bi-State Development Agency, Intervening Plaintiff, v. MISSOURI ATHLETIC CLUB, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 69664.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 10, 1996.

Francis X. Duda, Brian L. Daily, Anderson & Gilbert, Clayton, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James P. Lemonds, Richard J. Mehan, Holtkamp, Liese, Beckemeier & Childress, P.C., St. Louis, for defendants-respondents.

Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Paula K. Muehling and John W. Muehling appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Missouri Athletic Club in a slip and fall action seeking damages for personal injuries suffered by Paula K. Muehling when she fell on the floor at Missouri Athletic Club, and for loss of consortium suffered by John W. Muehling. Plaintiffs alleged that Missouri Athletic Club permitted a slippery substance to remain on the floor of the Art Lounge Room which caused Paula K. Muehling to slip and fall injuring her back and, further as a result, husband incurred medical expenses for Paula K. Muehling, and lost her support, earnings and consortium. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in excluding *177certain testimony of Paula K. Muehling and a witness, Patricia Nogar.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.
IV 

House Calendar No. 37 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 305 

[Report No. 111–70] 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 85) 

setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government 

for fiscal year 2010 and including the appropriate budgetary levels for 

fiscal years 2009 and 2011 through 2014. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2009 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. 

Con. Res. 85) setting forth the congressional budget 

for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010 

and including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal 

years 2009 and 2011 through 2014. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 85) setVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:23 Apr 01, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR305.RH HR305

SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 305 RH 

1 ting forth the congressional budget for the United States 

2 Government for fiscal year 2010 and including the appro3 priate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2009 and 2011 

4 through 2014. The first reading of the concurrent resolu5 tion shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

6 consideration of the concurrent resolution are waived. 

7 General debate shall not exceed four hours, with three 

8 hours confined to the congressional budget equally divided 

9 and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 

10 of the Committee on the Budget and one hour on the sub11 ject of economic goals and policies equally divided and con12 trolled by Representative Maloney of New York and Rep13 resentative Brady of Texas or their designees. After gen14 eral debate the Committee of the Whole shall rise without 

15 motion. No further consideration of the concurrent resolu16 tion shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent 

17 order of the House. 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 37 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 305 

[Report No. 111–70] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resoand 2011 through 2014. propriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2009 ment for fiscal year 2010 and including the ap- gressional budget for the United States Govern- lution (H. Con. Res. 85) setting forth the conMARCH 31, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.01






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asian Dragon Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Karlsson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/ John Karlsson


By: John Karlsson


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





Dated: January 19, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12542]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Notice; Meeting of the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary 
Advisory Council

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Advisory Council was established in December 1995 to 
advise NOAA's Sanctuaries and Reserves Division regarding the 
management of the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary. The Advisory 
Council was convened under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act.

TIME AND PLACE: Friday, May 24, 1996, from 9:00 until 4:00. The meeting 
will be held in the Coast Guard Group Port Angeles Air Station, Port 
Angeles, Washington.

AGENDA: A facilitated panel discussion of current marine transportation 
issues affecting the Sanctuary will be held.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Seats 
will be available on a first-come, first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Beres at (360) 457-6622 or Elizabeth Moore at (301) 713-3141.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program)

    Dated: May 14, 1996.
David L. Evans,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal 
Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 96-12542 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Rediff.com India Limited for year ended March 31, 2003, I, Ajit Balakrishnan, the principal
executive officer of Rediff.com India Limited, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 20-F.

|Date    September 2, 2003 |  | /s/ Ajit BalakrishnanAjit Balakrishnan
Chairman and Managing Director
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12584]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Army Science Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 27 & 28 June 1996.
    Time of Meeting: 0900-1600, 27 June 96; 1000-1600, 28 June 96.
    Place: Pentagon--Washington, DC.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board (ASB) Summer Study on ``Technical 
Architecture for Army (C41)'' will meet for briefings and 
discussions on the study subject. These meetings will be closed to 
the public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of title 5, U.S.C., 
specifically subparagraph (4) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C. Appendix 
2, subsection 10(d). The proprietary matters to be discussed are so 
inextricably intertwined so as to preclude opening any portion of 
this meeting. For further information, please contact Michelle Diaz 
at (703) 695-0781.
Michelle P. Diaz,
Acting Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 96-12584 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the Company) on Form 10QSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DON WILSONDon WilsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: April 14, 2008















---
Exhibit No. 32.1



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection  with the Annual Report of United  Service  Attendants,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Roger E. Pawson,  Chief  Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


January 14, 2005                           By: /s/Roger E. Pawson
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Roger E. Pawson
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Chief Financial Officer







----------------------

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March
      31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Fit For Business International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark A. Poulsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December
          31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ending December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fit For
          Business International, Inc.

Dated:  February 13, 2007

/s/ Mark A. Poulsen
-------------------
Mark A. Poulsen
Chief Executive Officer
#### Rodney K. SUTHERLIN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42501.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 6, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 27, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied May 15, 1990.

David S. Durbin, Appellate Defender, John L. Yohs, Asst. Appellate Defender, State Public Defender’s Office, Kansas City, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and CLARK and MANFORD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 24.-035.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 3, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00841-CV IN RE CHELSEA DAVIS, Relator Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-19281 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Fillmore Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus challenging numerous orders 1 of the associate judge in this case. Relator prays that the Court “reverse all findings, rulings, recommendations and orders signed by the associat e judge and direct the court clerk to close the case.” The facts and issues are well-known to the parties so we do not recount them here. The Court first considers its jurisdiction over this petition for writ of mandamus. “Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause.” Fin. Com'n of Texas v. Norwood , 418 S.W.3d 566, 578 (Tex. 2013) (quoting Sinochem Int'l Co. v. Malaysia Int'l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422, 431 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted)). The order of the

1 Relator has not included in her filing the complained–of orders , any document showing the matter complained of, or any other d ocument material to her claim for relief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k); 52.7. Relato r also has not properly certified her petition. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(j). Thus, relator’s petition fails to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 759 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding) (denying petition for writ of mandamus because petition and record not authenticated as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure).–2– associate judge is not an order of the trial cour t. Associate judges do not have the power to render final orders outside th e context of certain limited exceptions listed in section 201.007(a)(14) of the family code. Graham v. Graham , 414 S.W.3d 800, 801 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, no pet.). This Court does not have jurisdiction to grant a writ of mandamus compelling the associate j udge to vacate his orders. T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 (West 2010); Graham , 414 S.W.3d at 802 (courts of appeals do not have mandamus jurisdiction over the actions of an associate judge); see also Welder v. Fritz , 750 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1988, no writ) (j urisdiction of courts of appeals to issue writs of mandamus is limited to writs against judges of dist rict and county courts within district and a family law master is neither of these). This Court also does not have ju risdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk. T EX
. G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 (West 2010); In re Phillips , No. 05-14-00683-CV, 2014 WL 2609217, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 10, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Chumbley , No. 05–13–00881–CV, 2013 WL 3718070, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 12, 2013, orig. pro ceeding) (mem. op). Accordingly, we DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

140841F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  the Chief  Executive  Officer and the Chief  Financial  Officer of  Independence  Bancshares,  Inc. (the
"Company"), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in
          the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 9, 2006 |  | By: /s/ Lawrence R. Miller
        Lawrence R. Miller        Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 9, 2006 |  | By: /s/ Kimberly D. Barrs
        Kimberly D. Barrs        Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Gregory A. Pitner, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Terra Block International,          Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the          statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were          made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          registrant and we have: 

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others          within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this annual          report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)                 disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an          annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over          financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee          of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function): 

    a)                 all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting.