alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5114 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5114

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
entitlement to a headstone or grave marker under the laws administered 
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to certain members of a Reserve of 
                an Armed Force, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2023

  Mr. Lawler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
entitlement to a headstone or grave marker under the laws administered 
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to certain members of a Reserve of 
                an Armed Force, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Giving Reservists A Valiant Eternity 
Act'' or the ``GRAVE Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ENTITLEMENT TO HEADSTONE OR GRAVE MARKER UNDER 
              LAWS ADMINISTERED BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Paragraph (5) of section 2306(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(5) A member (or former member) of a Reserve of an Armed Force 
who is not a veteran solely by reason of not meeting the minimum 
active-duty service requirements under section 5303A of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATIONS




I, Adam
Jenn, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Canadian Minerals, Inc.
(formerly known as Barrington Foods International, Inc.);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





April 3,
2008








/s/ 
Adam
Jenn


Adam
Jenn


Chief
Executive Officer
#### J. Vincent O’Shea, Plaintiff, *v.*Gilbert C. Hanse, as Mayor of the Village of Babylon, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Suffolk County,

November 16, 1954.

*213
      *Lester B. Lipkind*for plaintiff.

*Wilbur H. Schneider, Arthur L. Milligan, George J. Aspland*and *Joseph F. O’Neill*for Gilbert C. Hanse, as Mayor, and others, defendants.

L. Barron Hill, J.

This is a motion by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Babylon individually and as members of said board to dismiss the second cause of action as set forth in the first complaint of a consolidated action on the ground that it appears on the face of the complaint that the facts as stated in said second cause of action are not facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The cause of action under attack is one whereby the plaintiff in a *taxpayer’s*action seeks to reform a deed of conveyance from the County of Suffolk to the Village of Babylon, said conveyance consisting of approximately 45 acres of land located on the easterly boundary of the village of Babylon.

The cause of action pleaded by the plaintiff states in effect that it was the mutual understanding between the County of Suffolk and the village officials that said land was to be used for park purposes. However, due to an inadvertent mistake, the drawer of the instrument failed to insert therein that the property was to be used for park purposes.

It is further alleged that the Village Board of Trustees has failed to take steps to reform the deed upon plaintiff’s request to do so.

The plaintiff in a taxpayer’s action must meet the requirements of section 51 of the General Municipal Law. A reading of that statute makes it clear that when a taxpayer is suing in a representative capacity he may bring his action to: 1 — prevent any illegal official act; and, 2— prevent waste or injury, or to restore and make good any property of the municipality. (See, also, *Altschul*v. *Ludwig,*216 N. Y. 459.)

Here, the plaintiff has failed to show in this cause of action that he comes within the afore-mentioned statute.

Motion granted as to the moving parties.

Submit order.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                 March 30, 2001

Bank One, National Association
1 Bank One Plaza
Suite IlI-0126
Chicago, IL  60670-0126
Attn: Corporate Trust Services

Ambac Assurance Corporation
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY  10004
Attn: Structured Finance Department-MBS

Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
99 Church Street
New York, NY  10004

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.,
55 Water Street
New York, NY  10041
Attn: Asset Backed Surveillance Department

              RE:  GreenPoint Home Equity Loan Trust (Series 1999-2);
                   Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Issuer
                   -----------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Section 3.9 of the Indenture with respect to the above-
referenced offering and in compliance with the requirements of TIA Section
314(a)(4), the undersigned officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. (as
"Manager") hereby certifies as to the following:

     1.   a review of the activities of the Issuer and its performance under the
          Indenture during the preceding fiscal year since the inception of the
          trust has been made under the direct supervision of the undersigned
          officer; and

     2.   to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
          review, the Issuer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under
          the Indenture throughout the applicable period, and there has been no
          known default in the fulfillment of the Issuer's material obligations
          throughout such period.


                         [Signature on Following Page]
<PAGE>

                                               Very truly yours

                                               GREENPOINT HOME EQUITY
                                               LOAN TRUST (Series 1999-2);

                                               By: GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING,
                                                   INC., as Manager



                                               /s/ Nathan Hieter
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Nathan Hieter
                                               Vice President
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Crown Media Holdings,Inc.:

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-37588)on Form S-8 of Crown Holdings, Inc. of our reports datedMarch 7, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CrownMedia Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensiveloss, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual reporton Form 10-K of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. Our report on theconsolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-BasedPayment*, effective January 1, 2006.

**KPMG LLP**

Denver, Colorado

March 7, 2007

----
#### SUPERIOR SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, Appellant, v. Charles JENSEN, d/b/a Diversified Technologies, Respondent.

No. WD 50396.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 24, 1995.

Paul R. Lamoree, Kansas City, for appellant.

Lawrence Jay Zimmerman, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., SMART, J., and TURNAGE, Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Superior Systems Technology appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of its breach of contract action against “Charles Jensen, d/b/a Diversified Technologies.” We affirm. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.7

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 10, 2007



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.2
ADDENDUM TO COMMERCIAL SUBLEASE
This is an Addendum to that Commercial Sublease (Master Lease) dated October 16th, 2003and is made between KZG (hereinafter “Sublessor”) and Save the World Air, Inc. (hereinafter“Sublessee”).
Sublessee hereby leases from Sublessor the additional premises described herein on the followingterms and conditions.
**1. Description of Additional Sublet Property**.
Sublessor sublets one additional office on the South side of the building located at 5125Lankershim Blvd., North Hollywood, CA 91601.
**2. Term and Rent**.
Sublessor demises the additional premises for a term to run concurrent with the Master Lease andshall commence June 1, 2004 and terminating on October 31, 2005, or sooner as provided herein at anadditional rental of $1,400 per month payable in equal installments in advance on the first day ofeach month in the sum of $1,400 per month during the term of the Master Lease.
**3.** Option to Renew.
Provided that Sublessee is not in default in the performance of this lease and the Master lease,Sublessee shall have the option to renew the Sublease for an additional term of two yearscommencing at the expiration of the initial lease term. All of the terms and conditions of theSublease shall apply during the renewal term except that the Sublease payment shall be 10% greaterfor this additional space, which will bring the total due for the initial space in the master lease($2,000) and this additional space ($1,400) a total of $3,400 shall be 10% greater or $3,740 permonth. The option shall be exercised by a written notice given to Sublessor not less than sixty(60) days prior to the expiration of the initial Sublease term. If notice is not timely given,this option will expire.
4. All other Terms and Conditions from the Commercial Sublease (Master Lease) shall remain in fullforce and effect.
Signed this 15th day of June, 2004 in North Hollywood, California:   SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. KZG      /s/ EUGENE EICHLER /s/ JENNIFER KINGBy: Gene Eichler By: Jennifer KingTitle: CFO Title: President
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Crown Media Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-37588) on Form S-8 of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. of our report dated
February 24, 2003 (except as to notes 1 and 17, which are as of March 11, 2003), relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. as of
December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002, which report
appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Crown Media Holdings, Inc.

Denver,
Colorado
December 5, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### The People *of*the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*John Joseph Messina, Petitioner.

County Court, Schenectady County,

December 26, 1956.

*Armand R. Riccio*for petitioner.

*Emmet J. Lynch, District Attorney (D. Vincent Cerrito*of counsel), for respondent.

Archibald C. Wemple, J.

This is a proceeding in *coram nobis*to review the judgment and sentence of the above-named defendant, of the County Court, County of Schenectady, on the 9th day of June, 1953.

The defendant was indicted by the Grand Jury of Schenectady County for the crimes of robbery, first degree, assault, second degree, and grand larceny, first degree, arising out of a robbery which occurred on December 15, 1952. All of the counts emanated from the same event.

After an original “ not guilty ” plea, the defendant, with advice of counsel, withdrew his plea of “ not guilty ” and entered a plea of “ guilty ” to all of the counts on May 4, 1953 and was sentenced on June 9, 1953 by the Hon. James W. Diddle, County Judge of Schenectady County, as follows: robbery, second, 5 to 15 years; assault, second, 2% to 5 years; grand larceny, first degree, 5 to 10 years; all of said sentences to run concurrently and not consecutively..

*1083The defendant is still in confinement at Wallkill State Prison, and in this proceeding challenges the validity of said sentence, alleging *“*triple punishment **** * unjust aggrievement * * * denial of due process of law * * * invalid judgment and sentence ” and asks to be remanded to the Schenectady County Court for resentence.

The petitioner further contends that there should have been a merger of the three counts and, under section 1938 of the Penal Law, a sentence pronounced on the ‘ ‘ highest grade of offense only. ’ ’

The District Attorney, in his answer to the petition, admits the possibility that, by inadvertence, the presiding Judge may have imposed sentences on the counts of assault, second, and grand larceny, first, but the District Attorney, at the same time, strongly contends that the defendant has not been prejudiced since the sentences imposed for the respective counts were to run concurrently and that, therefore, the defendant will not serve more than the time required in the' sentence for the *u*highest grade of offense,” which, in this case, is the sentence of 5 to 15 years for the crime of robbery, second degree.

This court is of the opinion that the sentence imposed on June 9, 1953, of 5 to 15 years, is not excessive. The remanding of the defendant to Schenectady County for the purpose of correcting the sentence would serve no useful purpose, nor would the defendant benefit thereby.

Following a recent previous decision of this court *(People*v. *Berry,*3 Misc 2d 984), the court directs that the sentence of this court dated June 9, 1953 be modified by deleting therefrom the imposition of the sentence of 2% to 5 years on the plea of guilty to the count of assault, second degree, and the sentence of 5 to 10 years on the plea of guilty to the count of grand larceny, first degree, for the reason stated, and that the sentence in all other respects shall remain in full force and effect.

Application denied. Submit order.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, John
Karlsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Asian Dragon
Group Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)  
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November
30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ John
Karlsson


John
Karlsson


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer


January
20, 2009







A signed
original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 72-6222.

#### Sparrow *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41219 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v.
JOSE GUADALUPE VEGA

- ZAPATA, also known as Ricardo Gonzalez, also known as Victor Guadalupe Medina,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15 -CR- 580 -1

Before KING, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Guadalupe Vega

- Zapata pleaded guilty to illegal reentry and was sentenced to a 36 -month term of imprisonment. On appeal, Vega -Zapata renews his challenge to application of the eight

- level aggravated felony enh ancement of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b) (1)(C). The gravamen of his argument is that, in light of Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), the definition

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 2, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41219 Document: 00513894497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/02/2017No. 16

- 41219

2 of a crime of violence (COV) in 18 U.S.C, § 16(b) is unconstitutionally vague on its face. Therefore , he contends, neither his prior Texas conviction for evading arrest with a motor vehicle nor his prior Texas conviction for assault of a public servant is a COV under § 16(b) , and th us neither prior conviction is an aggravated felony for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) and § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). As Vega

- Zapata concedes, his argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Gonzalez -Longoria , 831 F.3d 670 , 672

- 77 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16

- 6259) , in which we rejected a constitutional challenge to § 16(b) a s facially vague. Accordingly, VegaZapata’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-41219 Document: 00513894497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/02/2017