alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1068

In re: LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, 

a/k/a Lionel Elizah Williams,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(1:11-cv-00107)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lionell Elijah Ephraim, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lionell Elijah Ephraim petitions for a writ of 

mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed 

ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petitions. He seeks an 

order from this court directing the district court to act on the 

petitions. We find the present record does not reveal undue 

delay in the district court. Accordingly, while we grant leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0345 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUDSON LEE BROWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 20, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 13 2022

06/13/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0345
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7408
In Re: JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-209-M) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Johnson, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Joseph Johnson, Jr., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have this court direct the district court to act on a motion he alleges he filed on June 19, 2001, in a criminal case to expunge the record. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that Johnson filed a motion to expunge the record in January 2001, and that the district court has ruled on the motion. There is no record of an identical motion filed inJune 2001, as Johnson alleges. Further, this is the second petition for a writ of mandamus that Johnson has filed regarding a motion to expunge the record. Where there is another available remedy, mandamus relief is not available. In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is not a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Johnson could have challenged the denial of his motion by filing an appeal. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We grantJohnson’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24763-24764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12224]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Defense University Board of Visitors

AGENCY: Department of Defense, National Defense University.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President, National Defense University has scheduled a 
meeting of the Board of Visitors. The meeting will be held between 
0800-1200 and 1330-1530 on May 24, 1996. The meeting will be held in 
Room 155B, Marshall Hall, Building 62, Fort Lesley J. McNair. For 
further information contact the Director, University Operations, 
National Defense University, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC 
20319-6000. To reserve space, interested persons should phone (202) 
685-3937. The agenda will

[[Page 24764]]

include present and future educational and research plans for the 
National Defense University and its components. The meeting is open to 
the public, but the limited space available for observers will be 
allocated on a first come, first served basis.

    Dated: May 10, 1996.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-12224 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit
      32.1






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
          connection with the Annual Report of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc. (the
          “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
          I, Gregory A. Pitner, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer
          of
          the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
          Section
          1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that:


(1)       
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




**EarthBlock
                Technologies, Inc**Date: May
                9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Gregory
                A. PitnerChief
                Executive Officer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fernando Gastelum, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Chandler & Kyrene Hotel Group LLC, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-17-04089-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 On July 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Suspension and Request for Stay 

Pending Retainer of New Counsel (Doc. 27), wherein he informs the Court that his 

counsel’s law license has been suspended on an interim basis and thus counsel can no 

longer appear on his behalf. (Id.) Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court “stay this 

proceeding for a period of sufficient duration for plaintiff to find and engage new 

counsel.” (Id.) No response has been filed. This case, however, was terminated on 

February 20, 2018 and therefore a stay is not warranted.1

 (See Doc. 18). Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Request (Doc. 27) is denied as moot. This case 

... 

... 

.... 

 1

 On June 15, 2018, the Court stayed this action pending Plaintiff’s appeal in Gastelum v. 

Canyon Hospitality LLC, CV-17-02792-PHX-GMS. (Doc. 26). On September 10, 2018, Plaintiff-Appellant filed a voluntary dismissal of his appeal, and the Ninth Circuit granted the same on September 17, 2018. (See Gastelum v. Canyon Hospitality LLC, CV-17-

02792-PHX-GMS at Doc. 58). Accordingly, this Court’s June 15, 2018 Stay is no longer in effect. 

Case 2:17-cv-04089-DJH Document 28 Filed 11/06/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

shall remain closed. 

 Dated this 6th day of November, 2018. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:17-cv-04089-DJH Document 28 Filed 11/06/18 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |                                                                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| September                  18, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Mark              A.              McLeary         |   |
|                                |   | Mark              A.              McLeary                                                          |   |
|                                |   | Principal              Executive Officer                                                           |   |
|                                |   | Principal              Financial Officer                                                           |   |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENNIS DWAYNE JONES, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-15) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 29, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Dwayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying his motion for an extension of time to file a motion under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones , No. CR-94-15 (S.D.W. Va. Ma y 5 & 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Lexton Aaron Manakaja, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-17-8268-PCT-DMF 

ORDER OF DETENTION 

 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Supervised Release were held on April 18, 2018. 

The Court Finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has 

consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. 

 The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of 

proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., 

that he is not a serious flight risk. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 20th day of April, 2018. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139775

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139775 COA: 284566 Wayne CC: 07-020805-FC JOHN L. NORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 25, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 296 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 35
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 296

                          [Report No. 111-67]

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
       1388) to reauthorize and reform the national service laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2009

    Ms. Matsui, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
       1388) to reauthorize and reform the national service laws.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1388) to 
reauthorize and reform the national service laws, with the Senate 
amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention 
of any point of order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, 
a single motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Education and 
Labor or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendments. 
The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The 
motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education 
and Labor. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for 
division of the question.
    Sec. 2.  House Resolution 289 is laid on the table.
                                                  House Calendar No. 35

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 296

                          [Report No. 111-67]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
       1388) to reauthorize and reform the national service laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 30, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 322 

Expressing support for the designation of July 25, 2009 as ‘‘National Day 

of the Cowboy’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Ms. GIFFORDS (for herself, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. MITCHELL, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK

of Arizona, and Mr. POE of Texas) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of July 25, 2009 

as ‘‘National Day of the Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, known as cowboys, 

helped establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliation; 

Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and 

its creatures; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 322 IH 

Whereas the cowboy lives off the land and works to protect 

and enhance the environment; 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been part of the American 

culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy, through the work of approximately 727,000 

ranchers in all 50 States, and contributes to the wellbeing of nearly every county in the Nation; 

Whereas annual attendance at professional and working 

ranch rodeo events exceeds 27,000,000 fans, and the 

rodeo is the 7th most watched sport in the Nation; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

the cowboy spans race, gender, and generations; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music, and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of a 

3 ‘‘National Day of the Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 7, 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00713

- CR

Victor Noe Cortes

- Puga, Appellant

v.
The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKE R, AND SMITH AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the par ties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because a ppe llant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Peer Review Mediation and Arbitration,
      Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to such officers’ knowledge, that the
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                May 15, 2008*/s/Willis
                Hale*Name:
                Willis HaleTitle: 
                Chief Executive Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Roger Dale Godwin,

Defendant.

No. CR-17-01620-001-TUC-RCC (DTF)

ORDER 

On January 18, 2022, Defendant Roger Dale Godwin filed a pro se Motion to 

Amend Compassionate Release 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. 113.) The Court 

previously denied Godwin's pro se motion for compassionate release, stating that if 

Godwin filed another motion for compassionate release, that the Federal Public Defender 

must screen the motion pursuant to General Order 20-28. (Doc. 110 at 2.) However, the 

FPD has not yet submitted its response.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Federal Public Defender must screen Godwin's 

pro se Motion to Amend Compassionate Release pursuant to General Order 20-28.

Dated this 25th day of April, 2022.

cc: Keith Hilzendeger, FPD; Micah Schmit, USAO

Case 4:17-cr-01620-RCC-DTF Document 114 Filed 04/26/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. I

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Florida Holding Co. I (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 13, 2007



By:

/s/ TRACEY L. STOCKWELLTracey L. StockwellPrincipal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 270 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 270

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 21, 2009.
Whereas Hunters for the Hungry programs are cooperative efforts among hunters, 
        sportsmen's associations, meat processors, State meat inspectors, and 
        hunger relief organizations to help feed those in need;
Whereas during the past three years Hunters for the Hungry programs have brought 
        hundreds of thousands of pounds of venison to homeless shelters, soup 
        kitchens, and food banks;
Whereas each year donations have multiplied as Hunters for the Hungry programs 
        continue to feed those in need; and
Whereas 45 States have a Hunters for the Hungry program: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the cooperative efforts of hunters, sportsmen's 
        associations, meat processors, State meat inspectors, and hunger relief 
        organizations to establish Hunters for the Hungry programs across the 
        United States; and
            (2) recognizes the contributions of Hunters for the Hungry programs 
        to efforts to decrease hunger and help feed those in need.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```