alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Certification**I, William J. McGurk, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Rockville Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, basedon such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        September 28, 2005 /s/ William J. McGurk   William J. McGurk        President and Chief Executive Officer
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DIVIX GOLF, INC.,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JEFFREY P. MOHR AND REMEDY GOLF, INC., Defendants

,

AND

BANDWAGON, INC., Defend ant

- Appellant

,

AND

DIANA SARCOZ AND FELIX HOANG, Defendants.

______________________

2012

- 1235

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 05

- CV

- 1488, Judge John A. Houston.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DIVIX GOLF, INC.,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, Case: 12-1235 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 03/06/2014DIVIX GOLF
, INC

. v. JEFFREY MOHR 2

v.

JEFFREY P. MOHR AND REMEDY GOLF, INC., Defendants

- Appellants,

AND

BANDWAGON, INC., Defend ant,

AND

DIANA SARCOZ AND FELIX HOANG, Defendants.

______________________

2012

- 1236

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 05

- CV

- 1488, Judge John A. Houston.

______________________

O R D E R

Pursuant to this court’s December 30, 2013 order, Bandwagon, Inc. (“Bandwagon”) and Divix Golf, Inc. (“Divix”) filed status re ports indicating that Bandwagon and Divix have stipulated to dismissal of Bandwagon’s appeal (2012

- 1235). Jeffrey P. Mohr and Remedy Golf, Inc. have not filed status reports.
Upon consideration thereof

, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 12-1235 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 03/06/2014DIVIX GOLF
, INC

. v. JEFFREY MOHR 3

(1) 2012

- 1235 is dismissed. Each side shall bear its own costs in 201 2- 1235

. (2) Absent a status report from Jeff rey P. M ohr and R emedy Golf, I nc. within 14 days of the date of this order

, 2012

- 1236 will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
(3 ) The revised official caption in 2012

- 1236 has been reflect ed above.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 12

- 1235 Only): March 6, 2014

s30 Case: 12-1235 Document: 28 Page: 3 Filed: 03/06/2014
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Van Buskirk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.



|                      
|----------------------
|Dated:  March 31, 2003
|                      



I,
Thomas Scannell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.



|                      
|----------------------
|Dated:  March 31, 2003
|
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of pSivida Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leonard S. Ross, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 13, 2010



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Leonard S. Ross
|Name:               |  | Leonard S. Ross              
|Title:              |  | Vice President, Finance      
|                    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of New Oriental Energy & Chemical Corp.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended September 30,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Chen Si Qiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)  The
      Form
      10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      November 13, 2007


/s/ Chen
              Si
              QiangChen
              Si QiangChief Executive
              Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Van Etten, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for attempted burglary in the second degree. Defendant’s presence in the fenced-in back yard of the residence, standing at a bedroom window with one hand on the sill and the other on the partially open portion of the window, constituted conduct dangerously close to commission of the ultimate crime of burglary *(see, People v King,*61 NY2d 550). Defendant never knocked on a door or rang a door bell. When observed at the *977bedroom window, he asked directions to a street that was not in the vicinity of the neighborhood, and upon leaving, defendant went in a direction opposite from the instructions given by the occupant. He was arrested moments later, and items taken from a residence on the same street earlier that morning were found in his possession. In our view, the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the People *(People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196, 203), supports the jury’s conclusion that defendant intended to commit a burglary upon entering the premises.

There is no merit to defendant’s contention that imposition of the maximum imprisonment term was harsh or excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.— attempted burglary, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 272 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to strike rule XXVIII, 

popularly known as the ‘‘Gephardt rule’’, and to provide that any measure that increases the statutory limit on the public debt shall be stand 

alone and require a recorded vote. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2009 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. BARTLETT, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. 

FORTENBERRY, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. KINGSTON, Mrs. LUMMIS, 

Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. PAULSEN, Mr. 

PENCE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. SHADEGG, and Mr. WAMP) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

strike rule XXVIII, popularly known as the ‘‘Gephardt 

rule’’, and to provide that any measure that increases 

the statutory limit on the public debt shall be stand 

alone and require a recorded vote. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended to read as follows: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 272 IH 

1 ‘‘RULE XXVIII 

2 ‘‘STATUTORY LIMIT ON PUBLIC DEBT

3 ‘‘1. It shall not be in order to consider a bill, joint 

4 resolution, or conference report carrying a change in the 

5 statutory limit on the public debt unless it is entitled ‘In6 creasing the statutory limit on the public debt’. A bill, 

7 joint resolution, or conference report so entitled may not 

8 contain any provisions other than that changing the statu9 tory limit on the public debt. 

10 ‘‘2. A bill, joint resolution, or conference report car11 rying a change in the statutory limit on the public debt 

12 may not be considered as passed unless so determined by 

13 a recorded vote.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### A. Louis Medin, Plaintiff, *v.*Michael J. De Gennaro et al., Defendants.

County Court, Schenectady County,

April 2, 1956.

*41
      *Clark C. Wemple*for defendants.

*Philip M. Stark*for plaintiff.

Archibald C. Wemple, J.

Plaintiff and defendants entered into a purchase offer and agreement made part of the offer on the 24th day of June, 1955. . Thereafter and on the 24th day of August of that year, the plaintiff and one of the defendants entered into a further separate agreement relating to the dryness of the cellar, and then another separate contract on the same date called “ Construction G-uarantee Contract.”

The purpose that rule 90 of the Buies of Civil Practice intends to accomplish is to fully inform an adverse party as to the extent of the claims being made against him, thus enabling him intelligently to plan and prepare his pleading in response thereto. *(O’Hara*v. *Derschug,*232 App. Div. 31.)

‘ ‘ It is nowhere alleged that the last two contracts were modifications of the original contract or formed any part thereof, and the complaint furnishes no means by which it can be determined with certainty how the amount sued for is arrived at or apportioned between these three contracts. The defendants are entitled to know whether the plaintiff is relying upon the original contract, subsequently modified by mutual agreement, and if such is plaintiff’s contention it should state so unequivocally. If, on the other hand, the plaintiff is suing upon three separate causes of action, then they must be separately numbered and stated, and it must appear how much is sought to be recovered upon each of them.” (See *Seaman, Inc.,*v. *Stirn,*137 App. Div. 659, 660. See, also, *Egan & Co.*v. *Butterworth,*66 App. Div. 480.)

The court feels that it is difficult and even hazardous for the defendants to answer the complaint of the plaintiff because of the numerous separate contracts of differing dates. The fact that some of them were not signed by both defendants is significant. Defendants’ counsel on argument properly raises the question of consideration or lack of it as it may apply to the so-called agreements supplementing the original contract.

In the interest of justice and good practice, it is felt that *42plaintiff should separately state and number his causes of action of various alleged breaches to the specific contract which he claims has been breached and that the proper defendant be named in each case.

Motion is accordingly *granted.*Submit order.
exv10wxay



 




Exhibit 10(a)




Amendments to Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”)



Effective August 4, 2006, to reflect the two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock
dividend on the Company’s common stock distributed August 11, 2006, to holders of record on August
4, 2006:





	1.	 	The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan was amended to read:
	 
	 	 	“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 25, the aggregate number of Shares issuable
pursuant to all Awards under this Plan on or after March 1, 2005 shall not exceed
473,852,226 Shares (as adjusted to reflect the August 11, 2006 two-for-one stock split);
provided that each Share issued pursuant to Awards of Performance Shares, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Share Rights, Performance Units or Stock Awards shall be counted against this
limit as four (4) Shares.”
	 
	2.	 	The first sentence of Section 4.3 of the Plan was amended to read:
	 
	 	 	“No Participant may be awarded in any calendar year (i) Options or Stock Appreciation Rights
covering an aggregate of more than 14,000,000 Shares or (ii) Awards other than Options or
Stock Appreciation Rights covering an aggregate of more than 4,000,000 Shares, which limits
shall be calculated and adjusted pursuant to Section 25 only to the extent that such
calculation or adjustment will not affect the status of any Award theretofore issued or that
may thereafter be issued as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the
Code.”
Order filed November 2 , 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00 4 46

- CV

____________ ERNESTINE SOPHIE JIMENEZ , Appellant

V.

ROSEMARIE Z. LEWIS , Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1044770 & 1044770

- 002



### O R D E R

T he notice of appeal in this case was filed August 5 , 2021 . The clerk responsible for preparing the record notified this court that appellant had not made payment for the clerk’s record. No evidence that appellant ha s established indigence
has been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145

. On September 7 , 2021 , this court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless s he filed a response with proof of payment fo r the clerk’s record. No response was filed. Therefore, the court issues the following order.2

Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court that s he has made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before November 17 , 2021

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If appellant fails to do so , the appeal will be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Hassan

.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United Stated Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of TOP Group Holdings,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the period  ended  December  31, 2003 (the
"Form  10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information
contained in the Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   March 29, 2004                         /s/ Yang Hengming
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Yang Hengming, President

Dated:   March 29, 2004                         /s/ Lu Anli
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Lu Anli, Secretary and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SoftBrands, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005 (the “Report”), the undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ GEORGE H. ELLIS                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | George H. Ellis,  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                                                    |
|   | Date:                                                   | May  5, 2005 |

 

 
|   | /s/ DAVID G. LATZKE                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David G. Latzke, Chief Financial Officer, Senior  Vice President and Secretary |
|   |                                                                           |
|   | Date:                                                                          | May  5, 2005 |

 

----
Case 2:17-cr-01432-JJT Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01432-JJT Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01432-JJT Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:17-cr-01432-JJT Document 1 Filed 09/25/17 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Daniel Drummond, certify that: 1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wren, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May12, 2008  /s/ Daniel Drummond Daniel Drummond President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000110128-MAR-201208:15 AM