alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward v. BREMMER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 55639.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Feb. 27, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 11, 1990.

Dennis James C. Owens, Chesterfield, for appellant.

*762William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Movant, Edward V. Bremmer, Jr., appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of assault in the first degree, section 565.050, RSMo 1986, and was sentenced to thirteen years imprisonment. On June 30, 1988, movant filed a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief alleging newly discovered evidence. The court denied the motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. This appeal follows.

Movant claims the circuit court erred in denying the Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing because movant claimed there was newly discovered evidence material to his case. Movant’s new evidence is a post-trial, out-of-court statement made to him by the complainant that “he knew that the movant did not stab him in the back.”

No evidentiary hearing is required under Rule 29.15(g) if the motion, files and records of the case conclusively show that the movant is not entitled to relief. In addition, appellate review of a Rule 29.15 motion is “limited to a determination of whether the findings and conclusions of the trial court are clearly erroneous.” Rule 29.15(j). Such findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous if, upon review of the entire record, an appellate court is left with the definite and firm impression that a mistake has been made. *Moton v. State,*772 S.W.2d 689, 691 (Mo.App.1989).

It is well-settled in Missouri that a post-conviction proceeding is not the proper vehicle for relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence. *Westmoreland v. State,*594 S.W.2d 596, 598 (Mo. banc 1980). This is so even where the newly discovered evidence is evidence of another person’s guilt of the crime for which movant was convicted. *Phillips v. State,*639 S.W.2d 270, 275 (Mo.App.1982).

Movant further claims that the failure to conduct an evidentiary hearing on such newly discovered evidence constitutes a denial of due process rights under the constitution. However, there is no constitutional right to post-conviction review. *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 693 (Mo. banc 1989).

Movant has failed to identify any error in the lower court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed.

SIMON, C.J., and SIMEONE, Senior Judge, concur.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert E. BROWNING, Appellant.

Nos. WD 49683, WD 51208.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 24, 1996.

As Modified Oct. 1, 1996.

Jarrett A. Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Assistant Attorney General, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from jury conviction of second degree robbery, § 569.030 RSMo 1986, as well as denial of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

*314Conviction affirmed, Rule 30.25(b). Denial affirmed, Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**(Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Global Geophysical Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard A. Degner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  August 05, 2010 | /s/  Richard A. Degner                 |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                         | Richard  A. Degner                     |
|                         | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### David R. FRIEND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41821.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 22, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 3, 1989.

Sean D. O’Brien, Public Defender, Kansas City, John Vohs, Asst. Public Defender, Jefferson City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., William J. Swift, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and TURNAGE and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### FIRST CITY BANK, Respondent, v. Aaron FOWLER and Sherry L. Fowler, Appellants, and Michael D. Carroll and Debra Carroll, d/b/a Hoke Tow Service, Defendants.

No. WD 50833.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 26, 1996.

James W. Henry, Bruce D. Roberson, Kansas City, for appellants.

J. Neal Sawyer, Sinclair, Sawyer, Thompson, Haynes & Cowing, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Fowler and Sherry L. Fowler appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of First City Bank on its suit for replevin and the balance due on a promissory note. The Fowlers contend the trial court abused its discretion by denying them leave to file an amended answer, counterclaim and third-party petition. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22079-22080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11930]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on General 
Aviation Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss general aviation operations issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 22, 1996, at 2:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Federal Aviation 
Administration's Office of Rulemaking Conference Room, room 302, 800 
Independence Ave., NW., Washington, DC, 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Linda Williams, Office of 
Rulemaking, (ARM-100), 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20591, telephone (202) 267-9685.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
to be held on May 22, 1996, at Federal Aviation Administration's Office 
of Rulemaking, 800 Independence Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The agenda 
for this meeting will include a discussion of the FAA's study on 
manipulation of the controls of an aircraft by noncertificated persons. 
Attendance is open to the interested public but may be limited to the 
space available. The public must make arrangements in advance to 
present oral statements at the meeting or may present written 
statements to the committee at any time. Arrangements may be made by 
contacting the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.
    Sign and oral interpretation can be made available at the meeting, 
as well as an assistive listening device, if requested 10 calendar days 
before the meeting.


[[Page 22080]]


    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 7, 1996.
Steven J. Brown,
Assistant Executive Director for General Aviation Operations, Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-11930 Filed 5-8-96; 2:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of New Oriental Energy & Chemical Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Chen Si Qiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February
16, 2010


By:
              /s/ Chen Si QiangChen
      Si QiangChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10837]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, May 6, 1996.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:


    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.


Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.


    Dated: April 26, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-10837 Filed 4-26-96; 2:54 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Lucila DIAZ, Teofila Conception Diaz, Respondents, v. Jaime Armondo DIAZ, Appellant.

No. WD 45470.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted July 7, 1992.

Decided Sept. 8, 1992.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 27, 1992.

*680Daniel D. Lane, Kansas City, for appellant.

Clayton Chittim, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and SPINDEN and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jaime Diaz appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to set aside or modify a protective order entered against him and the trial judge’s award of $1,316.00 in attorney’s fees.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Adsero Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yvon Leveille,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Yvon Leveille
-------------------------------
Name:  Yvon Leveille
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 10, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31777-31778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12543]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16997 and #16998; Alabama Disaster Number AL-
00121]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Alabama

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alabama (FEMA-
4596-DR), dated 06/08/2021.
    Incident: Severe Storm, Straight-line Winds, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/25/2021 through 03/26/2021.

DATES: Issued on 06/08/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/09/2021.

[[Page 31778]]

    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/08/2022.

ADDRESS: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 06/08/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Bibb, Calhoun, Clay, Hale, Perry, Randolph, Shelby.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.000
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 16997 C 
and for economic injury is 16998 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-12543 Filed 6-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
EXHIBIT 99.4

                               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
                                    FORM 10-K
                   STAR RECEIVABLES FUNDING, INC. (REGISTRANT)
                      JCP MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST (ISSUER)
                   FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

           I, Iain J. Mackay, an Authorized Signatory of General Electric
Capital Corporation, the servicer for the JCP Master Credit Card Trust, hereby
certify that:

                     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
           reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
           filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
           annual report, of Star Receivables Funding, Inc.;

                     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,
           taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
           fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
           statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
           statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period
           covered by this annual report;

                     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
           information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer
           under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion
           in these reports is included in these reports;

                     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
           by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
           agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
           review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
           reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
           agreement; and

                     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies
           relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
           standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
           accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform
           Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure,
           as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
           that is included in these reports.

           In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: First Data
Corporation and the trustee.

Date: October 25, 2004


                                          By: /s/ Iain J. Mackay
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Name: Iain J. Mackay
                                              Title: Authorized Signatory
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12024]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
CA-058-1020-00


Notice of Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the of the 
Ukiah Resource Advisory Council will be held on Thursday, May 30, and 
Friday, May 31, 1996 in Ukiah, California.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 30 and Friday, May 
31, 1996.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting on Thursday will begin at 10:00 
a.m. at the Clear Lake Resource Area Office conference room, 2550 North 
State Street, Ukiah, CA. It will begin with a four hour training 
session on the basics of rangeland health. The remainder of Thursday 
will be spent in a tour of the Scotts Creek Allotment in Lake County. 
Friday, May 31 will be spent on finalizing standards and guidelines for 
rangeland health for public lands administered by the Bureau of Land 
Management in northwestern California.
    The meeting is open to the public with a public comment period 
scheduled for 1:00-2:00 p.m., Friday, May 31. Depending on the number 
of persons wishing to speak, a time limit may be imposed. Summary 
minutes of the meeting will be maintained at the Arcata, Clear Lake and 
Redding Resource Area Offices.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Snyder, Bureau of Land Management, 
Clear Lake Resource Area, 2550 N. State St., Ukiah, CA 95482, 707-468-
4000.
Valerie Parker,
Acting Clear Lake Resource Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-12024 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WALTER J. BERIONT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GTE LABORATORIES, INC., GTE SERVICE 

CORPORATION, GTE COMMUNICATIONS 

CORPORATION AND ALFRED H. BELLOWS,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2014-1424

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Massachusetts in No. 1:00-cv-11145-RGS, 

Judge Richard G. Stearns.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Walter J. Beriont moves without opposition for an 

extension of time, until August 12, 2014, to file his opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 14-1424 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 05/28/2014
2 BERIONT v. GTE LABORATORIES

The motion is granted.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

Case: 14-1424 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 05/28/2014
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA**

**SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. DA 22**

**- 0616** 

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP

OF:

M.H.O.

**ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME**

On appeal from the Montana Eighteenth Judicial District, In and for the County of Gallatin, Cause No. DG

- 21

- 43; Honorable Peter B. Ohman

Appellee/Petitioner Christopher Monaco has filed an unopposed motion for

a thirty (30) day extension of the deadline to file his appellee brief from February

24, 2023 until March 27, 2023. Appellant Michael H. Oudens, pro se, does not

oppose the motion.

For good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

Appellee’s deadline for filing his appellee brief is extended from February 24,

2023 until March 27, 2023. Appellant shall file and serve any reply brief in

accordance with the deadlines set forth in Rule 13, M. R. App. P.

True and correct copies of this order are being provided to counsel of record

for the parties. 02/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0616DATED this ___ _ day of February, 2023.

By: _________________________ Clerk of the Supreme Court

cc: Michael H. Oudens Kelsey Bunkers

Electronically signed by:
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court February 22 2023
Case 2:17-mj-09497-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-09497-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-09497-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-09497-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:17-mj-09497-ESW Document 1 Filed 11/01/17 Page 5 of 5