alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 371 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 47
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 371

                          [Report No. 111-90]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth the congressional 
budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010, revising 
  the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, and setting 
 forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2011 through 
                                 2014.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2009

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth the congressional 
budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010, revising 
  the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, and setting 
 forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2011 through 
                                 2014.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the concurrent 
resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for fiscal year 2010, revising the 
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, and setting forth 
the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2011 through 2014. 
All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read. The conference report shall be debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Budget.
                                                  House Calendar No. 47

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 371

                          [Report No. 111-90]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth the congressional 
budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010, revising 
  the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, and setting 
 forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2011 through 
                                 2014.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 28, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1 Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of The Honorable Franklin L . Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3112

___________ Robert L. Straitt, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 4, 1997 Filed: December 10, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rob ert L. Straitt appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civi l 1 action. First, we deny Straitt’s motions for contempt. Second, having carefull y reviewed the record and Straitt’s brief, we co nclude that dismissal was proper and that an extended opinion is not necess ary. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Edward McMILLIAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1003-90.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Jan. 6, 1993.

Douglas M. O’Brien, court appointed on appeal, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty. & Alan Curry, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in a trial by jury of the felony offense of aggravated assault. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 22.-02(a)(1). The jury assessed punishment at ten years’ confinement and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction in an opinion on rehearing. *McMillian v. State,*799 S.W.2d 311 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that unadjudicated extraneous offenses were properly admitted at the punishment phase of appellant’s trial in response to his application for probation.

The Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of our recent opinion in *Grunsfeld v. State,*843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Cr.App., No. 1037-91, delivered October 28, 1992).

Therefore, we grant appellant’s petition for discretionary review. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause remanded to that court for reconsideration of the issues presented.
|   | EXHIBIT 10.9 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|                                    |
|-----------------------------------------|
| AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT |
|                                    |

|                 |
|----------------------|
|                 |
| EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT |

|                                                            |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Exhibit III(A) - Statement of Compensation                      |
| Statement of Compensation — Dean                Sukowatey |

|                                |
|-------------------------------------|
| Exhibit IV(A) - Indemnity Agreement |
|                                |

|                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|
| Exhibit VI(A) - Confidentiality Agreement |
|                                      |

|                                     |
|------------------------------------------|
| Exhibit VI(B) - Agreement Not to Compete |
|                                     |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 360 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 360

   Urging all Americans and people of all nationalities to visit the 
      national cemeteries, memorials, and markers on Memorial Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2009

    Mr. Roe of Tennessee (for himself, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Gingrey of 
Georgia, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Jones, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Latta, Mr. 
    Gordon of Tennessee, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Lamborn, Ms. 
   Granger, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Alexander, and Mr. Buyer) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Urging all Americans and people of all nationalities to visit the 
      national cemeteries, memorials, and markers on Memorial Day.

Whereas the United States has fought in wars outside and inside of its borders 
        to restore freedom and human dignity;
Whereas the United States has spent its national treasure and shed its blood in 
        fighting those wars;
Whereas the National Cemetery Administration of the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs maintains 128 national cemeteries that serve as the final 
        resting place for nearly 3,000,000 veterans and their dependents;
Whereas each year, millions of Americans visit the national cemeteries, 
        memorials, and markers;
Whereas overseas sites annually recognize Memorial Day with speeches, a reading 
        of the Memorial Day Proclamation, wreath laying ceremonies, military 
        bands and units, and the decoration of each grave site with the flag of 
        the United States and that of the host country; and
Whereas these splendid commemorative sites inspire patriotism, evoke gratitude, 
        and teach history: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives strongly urges 
Americans and people of all nationalities to visit national cemeteries, 
memorials, and markers on Memorial Day, where the spirit of American 
generosity, sacrifice, and courage are displayed and commemorated.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 24, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00050

- CV

Thomas Kam , Appellant

v.

Ken Paxton and Jeff Leach , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, J USTICES TRIANA AND TH EOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order s signed by the tr i a l court on September 25, 2023

. Having

reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

. Therefore, the

C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating t o

this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12206]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 91F-0424]


Witco Corp.; Withdrawal of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 1B4282) proposing that the food additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of imidazolium compounds, 2-
(C<INF>17 and C<INF>17 unsaturated alkyl)-1-[2-(C<INF>18 and C<INF>18 
unsaturated amido)ethyl]-4,5-dihydro-1-methyl, methyl sulfates as a 
debonding agent in paper products intended to contact food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-216), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of November 29, 1991 (56 FR 61022), FDA announced that a food 
additive petition (1B4282) had been filed on behalf of Sherex Chemical 
Co., Inc., P.O. Box 6464, Dublin, OH 43017 (currently Witco Corp., 
Frantz Rd., P.O. Box 646, Dublin, OH 43017). The petition proposed to 
amend the food additive regulations to provide for the safe use of 
imidazolium compounds, 2-(C<INF>17 and C<INF>17unsaturated alkyl)-1-[2-
(C<INF>18 and C<INF>18 unsaturated amido)ethyl]-4,5-dihydro-1-methyl, 
methyl sulfates as a wet strength agent in paper products intended to 
contact food. Subsequently, upon a request from the petitioner, FDA 
published an amended notice in the Federal Register of April 15, 1992 
(57 FR 13104), stating that the additive is intended for use as a 
debonding agent rather than as a wet strength agent as indicated in the 
previous filing notice. Witco Corp. has now withdrawn the petition 
without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
 Alan M. Rulis,
 Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 96-12206 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12707]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3244]


West Point-Pepperell, Inc.; Prohibited Trade Practices and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Set aside order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order reopens a 1988 consent order--which required West 
Point to divest certain towel and sheet manufacturing facilities and 
prohibited West Point, for 10 years, from making certain acquisitions 
in the sheet and towel industries without prior Commission approval--
and sets aside the consent order pursuant to the Commission's Prior 
Approval Policy Statement, under which the Commission presumes that the 
public interest requires setting aside the prior approval requirements 
in outstanding merger orders and making them consistent with that 
policy.

DATES: Consent order issued December 14, 1988. Set aside order issued 
October 4, 1995.<SUP>1

    \1\ Copies of the Consent Order and Set Aside Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Ducore, FTC/S-2115, Washington, 
D.C. 20580, (202) 326-2526.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Matter of West Point-Pepperell, Inc. 
The prohibited trade practices and/or corrective actions are removed as 
indicated.

Authority: Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply 
sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 
15 U.S.C. 45, 18)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12707 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10697]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-30; OTS No. 4768]


Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association of Massillon, 
Massillon, Ohio; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 22, 1996, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association of Massillon, Massillon, 
Ohio, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the 
application are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20552, and the Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
200 West Madison Street, Suite 1300, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

    Dated: April 25, 1996.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision,
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10697 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
EXHIBIT 13.1

                         CERTIFICATION OF JOSEPH GROSSO
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 13.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of IMA Exploration  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ending  December 31, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Joseph  Grosso,
President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Director  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.


/s/ JOSEPH GROSSO
----------------------------------------
Joseph Grosso,
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Annual Report of Spare Backup, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Cery Perle, President, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.July __, 2011

/s/ Cery Perle

Cery Perle, President,Chief Executive Officer,

principal executive officer,principal financial and accounting officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ACCEPTED 04-14-00126-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/17/2015 6:06:54 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
1 The Hon. Michael J. Melloy, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 99-1383NI

_____________ United States of America, * * On Appeal from the United Appellee, * States District Court * for the Northern District v. * of Iowa. * Martin Becerra, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 17, 2000 Filed: February 28, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Martin Becerra appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 upon his guilty plea to distribution and aiding and abetting the distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The District Court sentenced Becerrato four years and nine months imprisonment and four years supervised release. For reversal, Becerra argues the District Court clearly erred in denying him an-2-

adjustment

for his role in the offense, especially when a co-defendant received a fourlevel minimal-role reduction.
Becerrawas not entitled to a mitigating-role reduction merely because his codefendant received one. See UnitedStates v. Jones , 145 F.3d 959, 963 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 457 (1998). According to the uncontested factual allegations contained in his presentence report, Becerra’s wife had arranged a drug transaction; he accompanied her to a meeting place with knowledge that the activity was somehow drug-related; and, in response to his wife’s signal, he had a brief discussion with a codefendant shortly before the co-defendant placed methamphetamine in an undercover vehicle. We conclude the District Court did not clearly err in finding that Becerra was “fully involved” in this transaction and in denying Becerra’s request for a mitigatingrole reduction. See Jones , 145 F.3d at 963; UnitedStates v. McGrady , 97 F.3d 1042, 1042-43 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1289

In Re: JOSE NACACIO AMU, a/k/a Amu, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:97-40-11,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(3:97-cr-00040-FDW-11)

Submitted: April 7, 2015 Decided: May 14, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Nacacio Amu, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Nacacio Amu petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging 

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a 

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). He 

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to 

act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the 

district court recently denied Amu’s motion for a sentence 

reduction based on Amendment 782, and the court previously 

denied him a sentence reduction based on Amendment 750.

Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided

Amu’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC., INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-1 No.333-114451 and Forms S-3 Nos. 333-82934, 333-89840, 333-105288 and 333-110197) of IntraBioticsPharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related prospectuses, and in the Registration Statements (FormsS-8 Nos. 333-40524, 333-65616, 333-101632, 333-108096 and 333-117140) pertaining to the Amended andRestated 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Employee Stock PurchasePlan, the 2002 Non-Officer Equity Incentive Plan, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and optionagreements with Kathleen D. LaPorte and Ernest Mario Ph.D., of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.of our report dated February 11, 2005, with respect to the financial statements of IntraBioticsPharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2004.
                    /s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.
San Francisco, California