alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.10


 


CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT


Management and Operational Services Agreement


 


This Consent to
Assignment (the “Consent”) is given as of this 27th day of October,
2006 by Blackhawk BioFuels, LLC (“Blackhawk Biofuels”).


RECITALS:  West
Central Cooperative entered into a Management and Operational Services
Agreement dated August 4, 2006, with Blackhawk Biofuels providing for
assistance in the management and operation of its biodiesel facility located at
Freeport, Illinois (“Agreement”).


REG, LLC, InterWest,
L.C., and West Central Cooperative joined their forces to expand upon their
biodiesel construction, management and marketing efforts by creating Renewable
Energy Group, Inc. (“REG, Inc.”) on July 31, 2006.  In order to be continuing to fulfill the obligations
under the Agreement, Renewable Energy Group, Inc. would desire to confirm
Blackhawk Biofuels’ consent to an assignment of West Central Cooperative’s
rights in the Agreement to Renewable Energy Group, Inc.


Performance of the
Agreement will continue under the same leadership and personnel, supported by
the same strategic partners as were involved previously under West Central
Cooperative.  By signature hereto,
Renewable Energy Group, Inc. assumes and agrees to perform and discharge all
obligations as set forth in the Agreement previously entered into by West
Central Cooperative with Blackhawk Biofuels.


	
  WEST CENTRAL COOPERATIVE

  	
   

  	
  RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By

  	
  /s/ Jeffrey Stroburg

  	
   

  	
  By 

  	
  /s/ Nile Ramsbottom

  
	
   

  	
  Jeffrey Stroburg, CEO

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Nile Ramsbottom, President

  



 


CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT


Blackhawk Biofuels hereby
consents to the assignment of the Agreement to Renewable Energy Group, Inc.


	
   

  	
  BLACKHAWK BIOFUELS, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/ Ronald Mapes

  	
  Chairman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  (Title)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anpath Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned J. Lloyd Breedlove, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stephen Hoelscher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |                                                                                                                   
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 | By: /s/  J. Lloyd Breedlove
Name:  J. Lloyd Breedlove
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                        |                                                                                                                   
|Date: November 14, 2007 | By: /s/ Stephen Hoelscher
Name: Stephen Hoelscher
Title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)    



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 4, 2014

No. 04-12-00398-CR

Robert WATSON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-1543-CR

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Sharon C. Kaiser, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)           evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this reported our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

 (c)          disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|                       |   | /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                                    |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 11, 2006 |   | Sharon C. Kaiser  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00182

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.T. , a Child

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA01505 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the order terminating Ap pellant’s parental rights to her child, Appellant’s brief was due on May 23, 202 2

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). To date, Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief.

W e ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS of t he date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution

. See id. R. 38.8(a). If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. Cf. id. R. 38.8(b)(2); Herndon v. Tex

. Dep ’ t of Family & Protective Servs

. , No. 03

- 11

- 00030

- CV, 2012 WL 896010, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Ma r. 13, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re T.V. , 8 S.W.3d 448, 449 (Tex. App.

— Waco 1999, order ).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on th is 27th day of May, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Wells Fargo Bank NA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Wyo Tech Investment Group LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-17-04140-PHX-DWL

ORDER 

 On June 27, 2019, the Court issued an order holding seven non-parties1 in civil 

contempt for their failure to respond to certain subpoenas. (Doc. 167.) During the hearing 

that preceded the issuance of this order, counsel for Defendants CWT Canada II Limited 

Partnership, Resource Recovery Corporation, and Jean Noelting (collectively, the “CWT 

Parties”) stated that “we’re happy to serve that order on these people by personal service,” 

that “a requirement of personal service on these people . . . will probably prompt some 

pretty quick compliance,” and that “I would hope that it doesn’t get to this point, but I think 

that the next step would be for the Court to direct the U.S. Marshals to pick up these people 

who are not appearing and not complying with the subpoenas.” (Doc. 172 at 14-15.) 

 It has now been nearly a month since the Court issued the contempt order, yet the 

docket contains no information concerning whether the non-parties were served with the 

contempt order and whether the contemptuous conduct has been cured. Accordingly, the 

 

1

 The non-parties are (1) Danzik Applied Sciences, LLC, (2) Charles J. Davis, (3) 

Richard W. Davis, (4) Ashley Mosharrafa, (5) Tamir Mosharrafa, (6) Ali M. Mosharrafa, 

and (7) Kristin Joiner Mosharrafa. 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 180 Filed 07/25/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Court hereby directs the CWT Parties to file a status report by Friday, July 26, 2019

addressing these issues. 

 Dated this 25th day of July, 2019. 

Case 2:17-cv-04140-DWL Document 180 Filed 07/25/19 Page 2 of 2
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 14

- 00 035

- CV

Style: Susan Anthony Potter

v

. Scott Michael Potter

Date motion s filed * : March 14 , 2014 , and June 11, 2014

Type of motion s : Motion to Request an Extension of Time to File Brief and Motion for Extension of Briefing

Deadline

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion s are :

 Granted in part and dismissed in part

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

A clerk’s record ha s not been filed with this Court, and the appellate record is not complete. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

34.1. Because the appellate record is not yet complete, appellant’s brief is not due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 8.6(a)

. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion for an extension to file appellant’s brief , filed on March 14, 2014

, and motion for extension of briefing deadline, filed on June 11, 2014, as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: July 3, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARLIN KELLY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 308 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21506-21507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11667]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communication Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical 
and Communications Systems (1196).
    Date and Time: May 28, 1996; 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 365, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

[[Page 21507]]

    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Paul Werbos, Program Director, 
Neuroengineering, Division of Electrical and Communications System, 
Room 675, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Telephone: (703) 306-1340.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate ARI proposals that were submitted 
to the Division of Electrical and Communication Systems as part of 
the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11667 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marani Brands, Inc. (“Marani”), on Form
10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Ani Kevorkian, Chief Financial Officer of
Marani, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350), that to her knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
February 17, 2008







By:
            /s/Ani
      KevorkianAni
      KevorkianChief
      Financial Officer
Case 2:17-cv-03967-JAT   Document 1   Filed 10/27/17   Page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv-03967-JAT   Document 1   Filed 10/27/17   Page 2 of 7

Case 2:17-cv-03967-JAT   Document 1   Filed 10/27/17   Page 3 of 7

Case 2:17-cv-03967-JAT   Document 1   Filed 10/27/17   Page 4 of 7

Case 2:17-cv-03967-JAT   Document 1   Filed 10/27/17   Page 5 of 7

Case 2:17-cv-03967-JAT   Document 1   Filed 10/27/17   Page 6 of 7

Case 2:17-cv-03967-JAT   Document 1   Filed 10/27/17   Page 7 of 7
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11043]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Correction Notice

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOL.

ACTION:  Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In notice document 96-10067 beginning on page 18158 in the 
issue of Wednesday, April 24, 1996, make the following correction:
    This document is hereby withdrawn and deleted in its entirety. The 
document was a duplication and should not have been published.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Theresa M. O'Malley,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11043 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12219]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Renewal Application Designated for Hearing

    1. The Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, 
has before him the following application for renewal of broadcast 
license:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Licensee                          City/State                        File No.           MM docket No. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The University of Kansas.....  Lawrence, Kansas......................  BR-900208YC............            96-109
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Seeking renewal of the license of KFKU(AM))
    2. Pursuant to Section 309(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
amended, the above application has been designated for hearing in a 
proceeding upon the following issues:
    (a) To determine whether The University of Kansas has the 
capability and intent to expeditiously resume the broadcast operations 
of KFKU(AM), consistent with the Commission's Rules.
    (b) To determine whether The University of Kansas has violated 
Sections 73.1740 and/or 73.1750 of the Commission's Rules.
    (c) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the 
foregoing issues, whether grant of the subject renewal of license 
application would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity.
    A copy of the complete HDO in this proceeding is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the dockets 
section of the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. The complete text may also be purchased from the 
Commission's duplicating contractor, International Transcription 
Service, 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037 
(telephone 202-857-3800).

Federal Communications Commission.
Stuart B. Bedell,
Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-12219 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### In the Matter of Consolidated Dairy Products Co., Inc., Petitioner, against Anthony Maurino et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

April 4, 1956.

*Abraham Dollinger*for petitioner.

*Dante S. Alberi*for respondents.

Arthur D. Brennan, J.

The petitioner applies for an injunction, pursuant to the provisions of section 964 of the Penal Law, restraining the respondents from using the name “ Lantern Lane ” in connection with the ownership of a luncheonette and to cease using the corporate name of Lantern Lane, Inc.

In 1952, the petitioner registered under the Trade Mark Act of 1946 a trade-mark containing the name, ‘ ‘ Lantern Lane ’ ’, which the petitioner uses in the sale of ice cream products sold by the petitioner to the respondent and other retailers in the metropolitan district. Since that time, it has extensively advertised its products under the name of ‘ ‘ Lantern Lane ’ Initially, the individual respondents or some of them conducted the luncheonette business under the corporate name of A. Gr. & M. Inc. In the course of negotiations for the sale of ‘ ‘ Lantern Lane ’ ’ products by the petitioner to the respondents, the petitioner’s representative was informed that the respondents had incorporated under the name of Lantern Lane, Inc., said certificate having been filed on December 23, 1955. The petitioner objected to the use of said corporate name by the respondents and when the discontinuance of the use thereof was refused, this proceeding was instituted.

From the facts presented, it is apparent that at the time of the assumption of the corporate name, Lantern Lane, Inc., respondents were fully aware of petitioner’s rights with respect to its trade name and trade-mark “ Lantern Lane ”, but willfully proceeded to adopt the same for the purpose and with the intention of misleading the public into the belief that they were dealing with the firm which manufactured and sold the ice cream products known as “Lantern Lane” or that Lantern Lane, Inc., was connected with the petitioner.

*784It is the contention of the respondents that by the use of this corporate name, it was not intended that the public should be deceived or misled. The simple answer to this contention is that if the respondents did not and do not intend to deceive or mislead the public, it can do no harm to change the corporate name to another. On the other hand, if the respondents intend to use the name unfairly, they should be compelled to adopt a different name. *(Matter of Hebrew Nat. Kosher Sausage Co.*v. *Hebrew Kosher Co.,*143 N. Y. S. 2d 306.) Nor is there any merit in the further contention of the respondents, wherein they assert that the only use of the name ‘' Lantern Lane, Inc.” is that which appears on checks which are issued, thereby inferring that the corporate name has not been used and will not be used in any other manner. Such corporate name is required, by section 440-a of the Penal Law, to be publicly displayed upon the exterior of the premises occupied as a luncheonette.

Accordingly, the application is granted. Settle order on notice.