alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**(Section 906of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Global Geophysical Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Degner,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated May 19, 2010 |   | /s/ Richard A. Degner                  |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Richard A. Degner                      |
|                    |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
----

|                                                                    |   | Three Months Ended |       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|------------|
|                                                                    |   | December 31, 2009  |       |   | December 31, 2008 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |
| Net Income                                                              |   | $                  | 1,114      |   |   | $ | 975 |   |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding for computation of basic EPS |   |               | 12,613,083 |   |   |   | 12,685,436 |   |
| Dilutive common-equivalent shares                                       |   |               | 8,403      |   |   |   | 20,527 |   |
| Weighted average common shares for computation of diluted EPS           |   |               | 12,621,486 |   |   |   | 12,705,963 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings per common share:                                              |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
|       Basic                               |   | $                  | 0.09       |   |   | $ | 0.08 |   |
|       Diluted                             |   | $                  | 0.09       |   |   | $ | 0.08 |   |
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5955 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to establish 

a repatriation grant program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 13, 2023 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. 

ESCOBAR, Mr. BOWMAN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, and Mr. THANEDAR) introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to establish a repatriation grant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Return Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPATRIATION GRANT PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4 of the State Depart7 ment Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2671) is 

8 amended— 

2 

•HR 5955 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)(2)— 

2 (A) in subparagraph (A), by amending 

3 clause (ii) to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(ii) private United States citizens, 

5 lawful permanent residents of the United 

6 States, or third-country nationals, on a 

7 grant basis, to the maximum extent prac8 ticable;’’; 

9 (B) in subparagraph (B)— 

10 (i) by striking ‘‘loans’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘grants’’; 

12 (ii) by inserting ‘‘and destitute lawful 

13 permanent residents of the United States’’ 

14 after ‘‘destitute citizens of the United 

15 States’’; and 

16 (iii) by adding at the end before the 

17 semicolon the following: ‘‘and lawful per18 manent residents’’; 

19 (2) in subsection (d)— 

20 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

21 by striking ‘‘loan’’ and inserting ‘‘grant’’; 

22 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

23 (i) by striking ‘‘borrower’’ and insert24 ing ‘‘grantee’’; and 

25 (ii) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

3 

•HR 5955 IH

1 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘a writ2 ten loan agreement’’ and all that follows and in3 serting ‘‘a written grant agreement.’’; and 

4 (D) by striking paragraphs (3) through 

5 (11). 

6 (b) UPDATE TO FOREIGN AFFAIRS MANUAL.—The 

7 Secretary of State shall update the ‘‘Repatriation Loans’’ 

8 section of the Foreign Affairs Manual to reflect the 

9 amendments made by subsection (a). 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12082]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

[Docket No. A96-14; Order No. 1109]


Forest Grove, Montana 59441 (May A. Charbonneau, Petitioner); 
Notice and Order Accepting Appeal and Establishing Procedural Schedule 
Under 39 U.S.C. 404(b)(5); Correction

AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In notice document 96-10340 beginning on page 18632 in the 
Federal Register issue of Friday, April 26, 1996, make the following 
correction:
    On page 18632 in the second column, the expiration date of the 
Commission's 120-day decision schedule was previously listed as August 
20, 1996. This should be changed to read August 13, 1996.

    Dated: May 9, 1996.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12082 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER E. ALONZO-RAMIREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70298

Agency No. A070-106-528

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Walter E. Alonzo-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of a request for a continuance. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

MAR 28 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
denial of a request for a continuance, Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th

Cir. 2009), and we deny in part, and dismiss in part, the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Alonzo-Ramirez’s

request for a continuance for additional time to prepare an application for relief,

where he had already received multiple continuances for that purpose, been

specifically instructed to file his application, and the delay caused inconvenience to

the agency and the government. See id. at 1013-14; cf. Cui v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d

1289, 1293 (9th Cir. 2008). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Alonzo-Ramirez’s remaining contentions

because he failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358

F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant, v. John W. KIRK, Respondent.

No. 89-SC-856-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

March 15, 1990.

As Clarified April 30, 1990.

Reconsideration Denied June 28, 1990.

OPINION AND ORDER

The Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association found respondent, John W. Kirk, guilty of violating DR 1-102(A)(4) for misrepresenting to an insurance company the status of a former employee injured in an automobile accident so that the individual could obtain workers’ compensation benefits. The Board recommended that respondent be suspended for fifty-nine (59) days.

Kirk has filed a Notice for Review pursuant to SCR 3.370(6). We deny respondent’s request for review and adopt the decision of the Board of Governors.

Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for fifty-nine (59) days. The respondent is directed to pay the costs of these proceedings.

All concur.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas Anthony WORTHY, Appellant. Thomas Anthony WORTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 63933, 67487.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Dec. 26, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 20, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ. *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Anthony Worthy appeals the judgment sentenced upon his conviction by a jury of first degree murder, first degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Financial Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Mangiapane, Jr., Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.


Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.


Chief Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


April 14, 2010
Letter Agreement with Chief Executive Officer



 Exhibit 10.1 
 November 7, 2006                     
 SENT VIA EMAIL AND FEDEX 
 Mr. Surendra Pai 
 Dear Suren: 
 By your signature below, you agree to modify Section 9.3(e) of your employment contract with Authentidate dated October 27, 2004, to extend the time within which Authentidate and you must reach agreement on a renewal of your
contract to avoid the automatic termination of your employment, to December 15, 2006. Section 9.3(e) as modified shall read as follows: 
 e. In the event the Company fails to notify the Employee in accordance with Section 8.2, or after notifying the Employee fails to reach an agreement on a new employment agreement prior to December 15, 2006, Employee’s
employment shall terminate on December 15, 2006 and the Company shall pay the Employee the Severance Payment; Accrued Compensation, and the Continuation Benefits. 
  


			
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/ J. Edward Sheridan

	J. Edward Sheridan
	Chairman, Compensation Committee
	
	 Agreed and accepted:

	
	 /s/ Surendra Pai

	 Surendra Pai


  

			
		
	Cc:	 	Victor H. Boyajian
		 	Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, LLP
		 	1221 Avenue of the Americas
		 	New York, New York 10020
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the****Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), theundersigned officer of Discovery Bancorp (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 12, 2005 /s/ James P. Kelley, II     James P. Kelley, II  *Chief Executive Officer*          The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report oras a separate disclosure document.
33
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12893]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[WA48-7121b; FRL-5506-4]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: 
Washington

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Washington for the purpose of 
updating regulations administered by the Energy Facility Site 
Evaluation Council (EFSEC). The SIP revision was submitted by the State 
to satisfy Federal Clean Air Act requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 
52. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, the EPA is 
approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision 
amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for 
the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse 
comments are received in response to this proposed rule, no further 
activity is contemplated in relation to this rule. If the EPA receives 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
June 24, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Montel Livingston, 
Environmental Protection Specialist (OAQ-107), Office of Air Quality, 
at the EPA Regional Office listed below. Copies of the documents 
relevant to this proposed rule are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours at the following locations. The interested 
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment 
with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the visiting day. 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air Quality 
(OAQ-107), 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The State of Washington, 
Department of Ecology, 4550 Third Avenue SE., Lacey, Washington 98504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Jones, Office of Air Quality (OAQ-
107), EPA, 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553-1743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
Jane S. Moore,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-12893 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EX-10.3 AMENDMENT/CHANGE CONTROL SEVERANCE AGRMT.



 






Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT TO




CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Change of Control Severance Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered
into by and between Joseph T. Trino (“Executive”) and Indus International, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation (the “Company”), effective as of October 20, 2006.



RECITALS




     1. The Company and Executive have entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement with an
effective date of October 1, 2005, as previously amended (the “Agreement”);



     2. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders to offer the Executive this Amendment;



AMENDMENT




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued
employment of Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows:



     1. Amended and Restated Section 1. Section 1 is hereby amended and restated to read
as follows:



     1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be for a one year term; provided,
however, that upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, the term of the Agreement
automatically shall be extended to terminate on the second anniversary of the Change of
Control. In addition, the Compensation Committee may affirmatively extend the
term of the Agreement at any time. The Executive may, by notice to the Company given not
less than 60 days, but not more than 90 days, prior to the expiration of the then-current
term, cause the term of this Agreement not to be extended. In the event that the
Compensation Committee does not extend the term of the Agreement, or upon such notice of
non-renewal by the Executive, the term of this Agreement shall terminate upon the expiration
of the then-current term, including any prior extensions.



     2. Miscellaneous Provisions.



     (a) Definitions; Integration. Any capitalized term not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meaning given such term in the Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Agreement,
constitutes the entire understanding of the parties as regards to the subject matter hereof and
cannot be modified except by further written agreement of the parties.



     (b) Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the
Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Gregory J. Dukat	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and CEO	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	October 20, 2006	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Joseph T. Trino	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	EVP of Corp. Strategy	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	October 20, 2006
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 2 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 3 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 4 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 5 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 6 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 7 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-00557-JAS Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 8 of 8
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10351]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1088-000; Docket No. ER95-1528-002]


Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, WPS Energy Services, Inc., 
WPS Power Development, Inc. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation; 
Notice of Issuance of Order

April 23, 1996.
    On February 16, 1996, WPS Energy Services, Inc. and WPS Power 
Development, Inc. (jointly WPS) filed an application for authorization 
to sell power at market-based rates, and for certain waivers and 
authorizations. In particular, WPS requested that the Commission grant 
blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liabilities by WPS. On April 16, 1996, 
the Commission issued an Order Accepting For Filing Proposed 
Transmission Tariffs, Conditionally Accepting For Filing Proposed 
Market-Based Rates, Establishing Hearing Procedures, And Granting 
Rehearing (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's April 16, 1996, Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (I), (J), and (L):
    (I) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by WPS Energy and 
WPS Power should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (J) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (I) above, WPS Energy and WPS Power are hereby 
authorized to issue securities and to assume obligations or liabilities 
as guarantor, endorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, 
compatible with the public interest, and reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purpose.
    (L) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of WPS 
Energy's and WPS Power's issuance of securities or assumptions of 
liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 16, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10351 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 8, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00292

- CR

Ex parte Alberto Garcia

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GO ODWIN

DISMISSED FO R WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from an adverse ruling entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed the record,

it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the

appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no

adjudication of costs is made.