alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CIRINO FIDENCIO MENDEZ,

Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 73439 Agency No. A201

- 237

- 693

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 12, 2019 **

Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N

. R

. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Cirino Fidencio Mendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ ( “ BIA ” ) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge ’ s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture ( “ CAT ” ). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 19 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 73439

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo qu estions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey , 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to

the BIA ’ s interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review f or substantial evidence the agency ’ s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review. The agency did not err in determining that Mendez failed to establish membership in a cognizable social gro up. See Reyes v. Lynch , 842 F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular group,

“ [t]he applicant must ‘ establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question ’” (quoting Matter of M

- E

- V

- G

- , 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))) ; see also Ramirez

- Munoz v. Lynch , 816 F.3d 1226, 1229 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding that “ imputed wealth y Americans ” returning to Mexico does not constitute a particular social group); Delgado

- Ortiz v.

Holder , 600 F.3d 1148, 1151

- 52 (9th Cir. 2010) (concluding “ returning Mexicans

from the United States ” did not constitute a particular social group). Thus,

M endez’s withholding of removal claim fail s
.3 17

- 73439

In his opening brief, Mendez does not make any arguments challenging the agency’s denial of CAT relief. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072,

1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and arg ued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2496-2497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1266]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2497]]


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board; Meeting
ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board will meet in closed session on 
February 7-8, May 1-2, and October 9-10, 1996 at the Pentagon, 
Arlington, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition & 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the 
Defense Science Board will discuss interim findings and tentative 
recommendations resulting from ongoing Task Force activities. The Board 
will also discuss plans for future consideration of scientific and 
technical aspects of specific strategies, tactics, and policies as they 
may affect the U.S. national defense posture.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly 
these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: January 22, 1996.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-1266 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21988-21989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11778]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
26 CFR Part 1

[FI-47-92]
RIN 1545-AR76


Reissuance of Mortgage Credit Certificates; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.


[[Page 21989]]


ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public 
hearing on proposed regulations relating to implementing a provision of 
the Tax reform Act of 1984 permitting the reissuance of mortgage credit 
certificates.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for May 22, 1996, 
beginning at 10:00 a.m. is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evangelista C. Lee of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7190 (not a toll 
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of the public hearing is 
proposed amendments to the Income Tax Regulations under section 25 of 
the Internal Revenue Code. A notice of public hearing appearing in the 
Federal Register on Friday, April 5, 1996 (61 FR 15204), announced that 
a public hearing would be held on Wednesday, May 22, 1996, beginning at 
10:00 a.m., in the Commissioners Conference Room, Internal Revenue 
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20224.
    The public hearing scheduled for Wednesday, May 22, 1996, is 
cancelled.
Michael L. Slaughter,
Acting Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 96-11778 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
**Exhibit 32**

 

**ATLANTIC SOUTHERNFINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This13th day of August, 2009

 

 
| /s/  Mark Stevens        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| /s/  Carol Soto          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 29, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23

- 852

Lower Tribunal No. 21

- 16604



### Maria R. Bacallao

, Appellant,

vs.



### Ruiz Janitorial Services & Maintenance Corp., et al.

, Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Beatrice

Butchko, Judge.

Law Group of South Florida, LLC, and Andy Loynaz, for appellant.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Therese A . Savona and Rook

Elizabeth Ringer (Orlando) , for appellee Palms Association of Alton Road,

Inc

.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Affirmed. See McCarty v. Dade Div. of Am. Hosp. Supply , 360 So. 2d

436, 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (hospital not liable where janitor slipped and

fell on a greasy substance in a hallway that the hospital had employed her

to clean); Parrish v. Matthews

, 548 So. 2d 725, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)

(defendants not liable where plaintiff was hired to perform domestic services

at defendants’ home and slipped on a piece of wrapping paper that was left

on the stairs).

2
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly Report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  June 10, 2009 /s/ Frank Pioppi Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 21**

**Subsidiary of Rubicon Financial Incorporated.**

 

|  

**Name of Subsidiary**             |  

**State of Incorporation** | **Percentage Ownership** |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Dial-A-Cup, Inc.                           | Nevada                             | 100%                     |
| Rubicon Financial Insurance Services, Inc. | California                         | 100%                     |
| Rubicon Real Estate & Mortgages, Inc.  | California                         | 100%                     |
| Rubicon Securities, Inc.                   | Nevada                             | 100%                     |
| Grant Bettingen, Inc.                      | California                         | 21%                      |
| AIS Financial, Inc.                        | California                         | 24.9%                    |
| Maximum Financial Investment Group, Inc.   | Michigan                           | 24.9%                    |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00309-CV

CITY OF EAGLE PASS,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

Irma Leticia SALAZAR,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-04-27357-MCVJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee Irma Leticia Salazar recover her costs of this appeal 

from appellant City of Eagle Pass. 

SIGNED January 14, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket Number 2022 -CA -1290

Lawrence David Phillips, Jr. 

Versus - - 

Exxon Chemical Louisiana, LLC and/ or Exxon Chemical

Americas, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Taylor-Seidenbach, 

Inc., The McCarty Corporation, Anco Insulation, Inc., 

Ingersoll Rand Company, AMEC Foster Wheeler

Constructors, Inc., Resco Holdings, LLC, as Success

On Application for

Rehearing

19th Judicial District Court

Case #: 691676

East Baton Rouge Parish

eating filed gp 07/ 07/ 2023 By Lawrence David Phillips, Jr. 

2

ohn MAael ry

Elizabeth Wolfe

Steven M. Miller

JUL 2 0 2023
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such year and the results of
operations of the Registrant for such year.
  /s/ BARRY D. QUARTBarry D. Quart, Pharm.D.President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ JOHN W. BECKJohn W. Beck, C.P.A.Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations and

Chief Financial Officer (As Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5985 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5985

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 517 Seagaze Drive in Oceanside, California, as the ``Charlesetta Reece 
                      Allen Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CHARLESETTA REECE ALLEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 517 Seagaze Drive in Oceanside, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Charlesetta Reece Allen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Charlesetta Reece Allen Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5916 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5916

 To require the Secretary of Agriculture to designate and maintain at 
least 20 percent of the total number of trails in the Shawnee National 
  Forest for trail riding by covered vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 2023

                 Mr. Bost introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Agriculture to designate and maintain at 
least 20 percent of the total number of trails in the Shawnee National 
  Forest for trail riding by covered vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shawnee Trail Riders Attaining 
Individuals Liberties Act'' or the ``Shawnee TRAILS Act''.

SEC. 2. TRAIL RIDING IN SHAWNEE NATIONAL FOREST.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall designate and maintain at 
least 20 percent of the total number of trails in the Shawnee National 
Forest for recreational use by covered vehicles, including trail 
riding.
    (b) Managing and Monitoring.--The Secretary shall manage and 
monitor the trails required to be designated and maintained under 
subsection (a) to assess whether such trails are appropriately 
maintained--
            (1) to provide for recreational use, including trail 
        riding;
            (2) to minimize any adverse impacts to natural resources; 
        and
            (3) to ensure that at least one trail remains open at all 
        times for the recreational use, including trail riding, of 
        covered vehicles.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.
            (2) Covered vehicles.--The term ``covered vehicles'' 
        means--
                    (A) electric bicycles (e-bikes); and
                    (B) off-highway vehicles (OHVs), including all-
                terrain vehicles (ATVs) and off-road vehicles (ORVs).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12209]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 185, Aeronautical Spectrum Planning 
Issues

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
Special Committee 185 meeting to be held on June 5-6, 1996, starting at 
9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows: (1) Administrative Remarks; (2) 
General Introductions; (3) Approval of the Agenda; (4) Review and 
Approval of the Summary of the Previous Meeting; (5) Review and Resolve 
Comments on Draft Version 8 of SC-185 Report; (6) Consider/Approve 
Version 8 with Corrections as Proposed Final Draft; (7) Other Business; 
(8) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-12209 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 342 

Expressing support for designation of May 2, 2009, as ‘‘Vietnamese Refugees 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Mr. CAO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of May 2, 2009, as 

‘‘Vietnamese Refugees Day’’. 

Whereas the Library of Congress’ Asian Division together 

with many Vietnamese-American organizations across the 

United States will sponsor a ‘‘Journey to Freedom: A 

Boat People Retrospective’’ symposium on May 2, 2009; 

Whereas Vietnamese refugees were asylum-seekers from Communist-controlled Vietnam; 

Whereas many Vietnamese escaped in boats during the late 

1970s, after the Vietnam War and by land across the 

Cambodian, Laotian, and Thai borders into refugee 

camps in Thailand; 

Whereas over 2,000,000 Vietnamese boat people and other 

refugees are now spread across the world, in the United 


smartinez on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 342 IH 

States, Australia, Canada, France, England, Germany, 

China, Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, the Philippines, 

and other nations; 

Whereas over half of all overseas Vietnamese are VietnameseAmericans, and Vietnamese-Americans are the fourthlargest Asian American group in the United States; 

Whereas, as of 2006, 72 percent of Vietnamese-Americans 

were naturalized United States citizens, the highest rate 

among all Asian groups; 

Whereas Vietnamese-Americans have made significant contributions to the rich culture and economic prosperity of 

the United States; 

Whereas Vietnamese-Americans have distinguished themselves in the fields of literature, the arts, science, and 

athletics, and include actors and actresses, physicists, an 

astronaut, and Olympic athletes; and 

Whereas May 2, 2009, would be an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘Vietnamese Refugees Day’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Vietnamese Refugees Day’’ in order 

3 to commemorate the arrival of Vietnamese refugees in the 

4 United States, to document their harrowing experiences, 

5 and subsequent achievements in their new homeland, to 

6 honor the host countries that welcomed the boat people, 

7 and to recognize the voluntary agencies and nongovern8 mental organizations that facilitated their resettlement, 


smartinez on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 342 IH 

1 adjustment, and assimilation into mainstream society in 

2 the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### D.Y., Relator, v. The Honorable Donald J. FLOYD, Judge, Respondent.

No. 94-1038.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1995.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of an October 4, 1994 order requiring discovery of mental health records. We note at the outset that there are threshold relevancy issues implicated by the trial court’s discovery order because D.Y. has admitted that his conduct fell below the standard of care for a drug counselor. Additionally, there is no indication in the record we have that D.Y.’s employers had access to his medical records, or that they knew or should have known of the existence of the records.

However, we believe the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the October 4, 1994 ruling of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of our opinion in *R.K v. Ramirez,*887 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.1994).1 Accordingly, we overrule Relator’s Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus, as supplemented, without addressing the merits of the petition and without prejudice to either party again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its ruling.

1

. Relator filed a "Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Petition for Writ of Mandamus” concerning a February 6, 1995 ruling ordering production of a second set of documents. In this order, the trial court expressly stated that it had reviewed the documents in light of *R.K.*Our directive to the trial court applies only to the October 4, 1994 order.
#### Karen Sue KETTINGER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Elmer Wayne BRINKLEY, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 66469.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 18, 1995.

Robert N. Hamilton, Charles P. Todt, the Todt Law Firm, P.C., Clayton, for appellant.

Corinne Coston, Mary Ann Weems, Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting father’s cross-motion to modify the custody provision of a November 2,1987, decree of dissolution relating to their daughter, S.E.B. We affirm. The circuit court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).