alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**Certification**I, Gregory A. White, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rockville Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) [Omitted as permitted by Exchange Act Release No. 47986];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        November 14, 2006   /s/ Mr. Gregory A. White    Mr. Gregory A. White    SVP, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (i)                       | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the six months                ending                May 31th , 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit                32                (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (ii)                      | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

| By:     | */s/                Graham G. Alexander*                           |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:   | Graham                Alexander                                    |
| Title:  | Chief                Executive Officer                        |
|    | and                Chief Financial Officer                    |
| Date:   | July                5th                ,                2008  |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Yacht Finders, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey Greenwood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of October, 2007.


/s/ Geoffrey Greenwood
------------------------------
Geoffrey Greenwood
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-46108, 333-57896, 333-87164, 333-106189, 333-114003 and 333-124467) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc., and in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-106706, 333-112376 and 333-112382) of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc., Sirenza
Microdevices, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



|                 |  |                      
|---------------- |  | ---------------------
|Denver, Colorado |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|March 13, 2006   |  |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12107]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; the ATM Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 2, 1996, pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the ATM Forum (``Forum'') 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the changes 
are as follows: ABB, HAFO, Jarfalla, SWEDEN; Anixter, Inc., Skokie, IL; 
Anritsu Wiltron, Atsugi-Shi, Kanagawa, JAPAN; Belgacom, Brussels, 
BELGIUM; Diamond Lane Communications, Petaluma, CA; GN Nettest, 
Markham, Ontario, CANADA; Incite, Dallas, TX; Integrated Systems 
Technology, Lanham, MD; Litton-Fibercom, Roanoke, VA; Molex, Lisle, IL; 
Scope Communications, Northboro, MA; Southern New England Telephone, 
North Haven, CT; Super Highway Company, New York, NY; US Robotics, 
Westborough, MA; and Wandel & Goltermann, Eningen, GERMANY have been 
added to the venture. Telenex has changed its name to General Signal 
Networks. Chipcom has withdrawn from the venture.
    On April 19, 1993, the Forum filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant section 6(b) of the 
Act on June 2, 1993 (58 FR 45532). The last notification was filed on 
August 8, 1995. A notice was published in the Federal Register on March 
12, 1996 (61 FR 10011).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-12107 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 4, 2021 No. 04-20-00062-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.M., B.M. AND A.B.M., MINOR CHILDREN From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-09419 Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellee’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due June 1, 2021.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aviza Technology, Inc. (the “Company”),the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)           the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterended December 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany for the periods presented therein.

 

 
| Date: February 13, 2006 |
|-------------------------|
|                    | By: | /s/ Jerauld J. Cutini |   |
|                    |   | Jerauld J. Cutini |
|                    |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 1 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 2 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 3 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 4 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 5 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 6 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 7 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 8 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 9 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 10 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 11 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 12 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 13 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 14 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 15 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 16 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 17 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 18 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 19 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 20 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 21 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 22 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 23 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 24 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 25 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 26 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 27 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 28 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 29 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 30 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 31 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 32 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 33 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 34 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 35 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 36 of 37

Case 2:17-cv-03828-JAT--DMF   Document 8   Filed 06/29/18   Page 37 of 37
H. Res. 260 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 16, 2009. 

Whereas the infant mortality rate of a nation is an important 

indicator of that nation’s overall health; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

have found that the United States ranked 29th in the 

world in infant mortality in 2004, falling from 12th in 

1960; 

Whereas there are more than 28,000 deaths to children 

under 1 year of age each year in the United States; 

Whereas preterm birth has a considerable impact on the 

United States infant mortality rate, in 2005, 68.6 percent of all infant deaths occurred to preterm infants, up 

from 65.6 percent in 2000; 

Whereas the United States infant mortality rate for non-Hispanic Black women was 2.4 times the rate for non-Hispanic White women in 2005; 

Whereas in 2005, the United States infant mortality rates 

were above average for non-Hispanic Black women at 

13.63 deaths per 1,000 live births, for Puerto Rican 

women at 8.30 deaths per 1,000 live births, and for 

American Indian or Alaska Native women at 8.06 deaths 

per 1,000 live births; 
2 

•HRES 260 EH 

Whereas in Memphis, Tennessee, the infant mortality rate is 

three times higher than that of the United States (higher 

than any other city in the country), and the 2005 infant 

mortality rate in the 38108 zip code of Memphis was 

deadlier for babies than that of the countries of Vietnam, 

Iran, and El Salvador with 31 deaths per 1,000 live 

births, 5 times that of the 2005 national average of 6.86 

deaths per 1,000 live births; 

Whereas adequate prenatal care has a studied, positive effect 

on the health of the baby; 

Whereas prenatal care is one of the most important interventions for ensuring the health of pregnant women and 

their infants; 

Whereas 29 percent of mothers 15 to 19 years of age received no early prenatal care in 2004 according to the 

Department of Health and Human Services; 

Whereas non-Hispanic Black mothers were 2.6 times more 

likely than non-Hispanic White mothers to begin prenatal 

care in the third trimester, or not receive prenatal care 

at all; 

Whereas babies born to mothers who received no prenatal 

care are three times more likely to be born at low birth 

weight, and five times more likely to die, than those 

whose mothers received prenatal care, as stated by the 

Department of Health and Human Services; 

Whereas the United States’ high infant mortality rate reflects 

in part racial disparities in premature and low birthweight babies; and 

Whereas the racial disparities in infant mortality may relate 

to socioeconomic status, access to medical care, and the 

education level of the mother: Now, therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 260 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports efforts to understand racial disparities and the rate of infant 

mortality in order to lower the rate of infant mortality in the 

United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT      32**

|                                       |                                           |                               |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                           |
|                                  |                                      |                          |
| *Dated:                    April 16, 2007* | *By:*                                | */s/                  Song Ru-Hua* |
|                                       |                                                |
|                                       | *Song                      Ru-Hua,**President* |

|                                     |                                           |                                 |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                           |
|                                |                                      |                            |
| *Dated:                  April 16, 2007* | *By:*                                | */s/                Zhao Xiao-Zhong* |
|                                     |                                                |
|                                     | *Zhao                  Xiao-Zhong,**Treasurer* |
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00092
- CV

__________________
IN RE KENNETH A. BITGOOD AND FRANK O. CARROLL III

_________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 20
- 05
- 05682
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER Kenneth A. Bitgood and Frank O. Carroll III, Relators, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relators

are the plaintiff and his counsel of record in Trial Cause Number 20

- 05

- 05682

- CV, Kenneth A. Bitgood v. Stephen S. Harkness and Anna M. Harkness

. Relator s seek a writ compelling the Honorable Vince Santini , Judge of the 457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, to vacate a March 31, 2021 O rder Imposing Sanctions

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221.2 Relators request that the trial court’s order imposing sanctions be stayed while this Court considers the mandamus petition. The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It is ORDERED that the trial court’s March 31, 2021 O rder Imposing Sanctions in Trial Cause Number 20

- 05

- 05682

- CV is STAYED until our opinion issues in this mandamus action or until further order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of Relators as a condition to any relief h erein granted. The response of the Real Part ies in Interest, Stephen S. Harkness and Anna M. Harkness, is due on or before Monday, May 10, 2021

. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.
ORDER ENTERED April 28 , 2021.
PER CURIAM Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sports Source, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
      10-QSB"), I, David Tang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)  The
      Form
      10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
                November 9, 2006
            
            /s/
              David TangDavid
              Tang - Chief Financial Officer
#### In re Stan J. VOEHL, Petitioner-Respondent.

No. 16499.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.

Feb. 7, 1990.

No appearance for petitioner-respondent.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jatha B. Sadowski, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Missouri Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Although never having been made or having sought to be a party to this matter, the Director of Revenue filed a notice of appeal.

On June 23, 1989, the trial court entered an order allowing petitioner a limited driving privilege. On July 21, 1989, the Director of Revenue filed a “Motion to Set Aside Order” which moved the trial court to set aside its order and to dismiss the petition.

On July 31, 1989, the Director filed in the trial court a “Motion to Dismiss” the “Motion to Set Aside Order” due to “lack of subject matter jurisdiction”. That same day the Director also filed a notice of appeal to this District. As a nonparty the Director cannot appeal from the trial court’s order. *Proctor v. Director of Revenue,*753 S.W.2d 69, 71 (Mo.App.1988).

The appeal is dismissed.

All concur.