20124 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 88 / Monday, May 6, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

received will be considered prior to

finalization of this rule.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985

Marketing agreements, Oils and fats,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Spearmint oil.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, 7 CFR Part 985 is amended as

follows:

PART 985—SPEARMINT OIL

PRODUCED IN THE FAR WEST

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

Part 985 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

2. Section 985.141 is added to read as

follows:

§ 985.141 Assessment rate.

On and after June 1, 1996, an

assessment rate of $0.10 per pound is

established for Far West spearmint oil.

Unexpended funds may be carried over

as a reserve.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

Robert C. Keeney,

Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11152 Filed 5–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

7 CFR Part 1007

[Docket No. AO–366–A37; DA–95–22]

Milk in the Southeast Marketing Area;

Order Amending the Order

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,

USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This final rule amends certain

location adjustments under the

Southeast Federal milk marketing order.

The amendments are based upon

industry proposals considered at a

public hearing held on September 19,

1995. The amended order was approved

by more than two-thirds of the

producers voting in the specified

marketing area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nicholas Memoli, Marketing Specialist,

Order Formulation Branch, USDA/

AMS/Dairy Division, Room 2971, South

Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington,

DC 20090–6456, (202) 690–1932.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

administrative rule is governed by the

provisions of sections 556 and 557 of

Title 5 of the United States Code and,

therefore, is excluded from the

requirements of Executive Order 12866.

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5

U.S.C. 601–612) requires the Agency to

examine the impact of a proposed rule

on small entities. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.

605(b), the Administrator of the

Agricultural Marketing Service has

certified that this action will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

The amended order will promote

orderly marketing of milk by producers

and regulated handlers.

This final rule has been reviewed

under Executive Order 12778, Civil

Justice Reform. This rule is not intended

to have a retroactive effect. This rule

will not preempt any state or local laws,

regulations, or policies, unless they

present an irreconcilable conflict with

this rule.

The Agricultural Marketing

Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7

U.S.C. 601–674), provides that

administrative proceedings must be

exhausted before parties may file suit in

court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the

Act, any handler subject to an order may

file with the Secretary a petition stating

that the order, any provision of the

order, or any obligation imposed in

connection with the order is not in

accordance with the law and requesting

a modification of an order or to be

exempted from the order. A handler is

afforded the opportunity for a hearing

on the petition. After a hearing, the

Secretary would rule on the petition.

The Act provides that the district court

of the United States in any district in

which the handler is an inhabitant, or

has its principal place of business, has

jurisdiction in equity to review the

Secretary’s ruling on the petition,

provided a bill in equity is filed not

later than 20 days after the date of the

entry of the ruling.

Prior Documents in This Proceeding

Notice of Hearing: Issued August 11,

1995; published August 17, 1995 (60 FR

42815).

Supplemental Notice of Hearing:

Issued September 8, 1995; published

September 13, 1995 (60 FR 47495).

Recommended Decision: Issued

December 18, 1995; published

December 27, 1995 (60 FR 66929).

Final Decision: Issued March 18,

1996; published March 22, 1996 (61 FR

11756).

Findings and Determinations

The findings and determinations

hereinafter set forth supplement those

that were made when the order was first

issued and when it was amended. The

previous findings and determinations

are hereby ratified and confirmed,

except where they may conflict with

those set forth herein.

(a) Findings. A public hearing was

held upon certain proposed

amendments to the tentative marketing

agreement and to the order regulating

the handling of milk in the Southeast

marketing area. The hearing was held

pursuant to the provisions of the

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act

of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),

and the applicable rules of practice and

procedure (7 CFR Part 900).

Upon the basis of the evidence

introduced at such hearing and the

record thereof, it is found that:

(1) The Southeast order, as hereby

amended, and all the terms and

conditions thereof, will tend to

effectuate the declared policy of the Act;

(2) The parity prices of milk, as

determined pursuant to section 2 of the

Act, are not reasonable in view of the

price of feeds, available supplies of

feeds, and other economic conditions

which affect market supply and demand

for milk in the marketing area. The

minimum prices specified in the order,

as hereby amended, are such prices as

will reflect the aforesaid factors, insure

a sufficient quantity of pure and

wholesome milk, and be in the public

interest; and

(3) The Southeast order, as hereby

amended, will regulate the handling of

milk in the same manner as, and will be

applicable only to persons in the

respective classes of industrial and

commercial activity specified in, a

marketing agreement upon which a

hearing has been held.

(b) Determinations. It is hereby

determined that:

(1) The refusal or failure of handlers

(excluding cooperative associations

specified in Sec. 8c(9) of the Act) of

more than 50 percent of the milk which

is marketed within the Southeast

marketing area to sign a proposed

marketing agreement tends to prevent

the effectuation of the declared policy of

the Act;

(2) The issuance of this order

amending the order is the only practical

means pursuant to the declared policy

of the Act of advancing the interests of

producers as defined in the order as

hereby amended; and

(3) The issuance of the order

amending the order is favored by at least

two-thirds of the producers who during

December 1995 were engaged in the

production of milk for sale in the

Southeast marketing area.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1007

Milk marketing orders.

Order Relative to Handling

It is therefore ordered, that on and

after the effective date hereof, the
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 88 / Monday, May 6, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 20125

handling of milk in the Southeast

marketing area shall be in conformity to

and in compliance with the terms and

conditions of the order, as amended,

and as hereby further amended, as

follows:

PART 1007—MILK IN THE SOUTHEAST

MARKETING AREA

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

part 1007 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

§ 1007.2 [Amended]

2. In § 1007.2, Zone 11, under

‘‘Alabama Counties’’ the words ‘‘(more

than 20 miles from the Mobile city

hall)’’ are removed following the word

‘‘Mobile’’ and under ‘‘Louisiana

Parishes’’ the words ‘‘(north of State

Highway 16)’’ are added following the

word ‘‘Tangipahoa’’.

3. In § 1007.2, Zone 12, the heading

‘‘Alabama Counties’’ and the entry

under it are removed and under

‘‘Louisiana Parishes’’ the words

‘‘Tangipahoa (south of State Highway

16)’’ are added following the word ‘‘St.

Mary,’’.

§ 1007.50 [Amended]

4. In § 1007.50(d), the words ‘‘value

per hundredweight of 3.5 percent milk

and rounded to the nearest cent, and

subject to the adjustments set forth in

paragraph (c) of this section for the

applicable month’’ are removed and the

words ‘‘times 35 and rounded to the

nearest cent’’ are added in their place.

§ 1007.92 [Amended]

5. In the introductory text of

§ 1007.92(c), the word ‘‘four’’, where it

appears for the third and final time, is

changed to read ‘‘three’’.

Dated: April 29, 1996.

Michael V. Dunn,

Assistant Secretary, Marketing and

Regulatory Programs.

[FR Doc. 96–10992 Filed 5–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 614

RIN 3052–AB52

Loan Policies and Operations;

Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit

Administration (FCA) published a final

regulation under part 614 on March 20,

1996 (61 FR 11303). The final regulation

removes the requirement that Farm

Credit institutions give borrowers 10

days prior notification of a change in the

interest rate on their variable rate loans

and replaces it with a 10-day post

notification for interest rate changes for

administered rate loans and a 30-day

notice if the loan is tied to an external

index. In accordance with 12 U.S.C.

2252, the effective date of the final rule

is 30 days from the date of publication

in the Federal Register during which

either or both Houses of Congress are in

session. Based on the records of the

sessions of Congress, the effective date

of the regulations is May 3, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation

amending 12 CFR part 614 published on

March 20, 1996 (61 FR 11303) is

effective May 3, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Child, Policy Analyst, Regulation

Development, Office of Examination,

Farm Credit Administration, McLean,

Virginia 22102–5090, (703) 883–4498,

TDD (703) 883–4444,

or

Joy E. Strickland, Senior Attorney,

Regulatory Operations Division,

Office of General Counsel, Farm

Credit Administration, McLean,

Virginia 22102–5090, (703) 883–4020,

TDD (703) 883–4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a) (9) and (10))

Dated: May 1, 1996.

Floyd Fithian,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 96–11225 Filed 5–03–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6705–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 95–ANE–58; Amendment 39–

9461; AD 95–26–03]

Airworthiness Directives; Pratt and

Whitney JT8D Series Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This document makes a

correction to Airworthiness Directive

(AD) 95–26–03 applicable to Pratt &

Whitney (PW) JT8D series turbofan

engines that was published in the

Federal Register on December 27, 1995

(60 FR 66872). An engine model was

omitted from the Applicability

paragraph. This document adds the

omitted engine model. In all other

respects, the original document remains

the same.

DATES: Effective May 6, 1996.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final

rule airworthiness directive applicable

to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D series

turbofan engines, was published in the

Federal Register on December 27, 1995

(60 FR 66872). The following correction

is needed:

On page 66874, in the first column, in

the Compliance Section, in the

Applicability paragraph, in the second

line, ‘‘Models JT8D–1, –1A, –1B, –7,

–7A, –9, –9A ‘‘ should read ‘‘Models

JT8D–1, –1A, –1B, –7, –7A, –7B. –9,

–9A.’’

Issued in Burlington, MA, on April 17,

1996.

Jay J. Pardee,

Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 96–11172 Filed 5–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 95–CE–22–AD; Amendment 39–

9610; AD 96–10–05]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Maule

Aerospace Technologies, Inc. Models

M–4–210 and M–4–210C Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD) that

applies to certain Maule Aerospace

Technologies, Inc. (Maule) Models M–

4–210 and M–4–210C airplanes that

have Dual Exhaust System 5230F

installed. This action requires relocating

the gascolator and electric fuel pump

away from the dual exhaust system. The

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

recently became aware that, with these

dual exhaust systems installed on the

affected airplanes, the left-hand exhaust

stack is routed almost directly below the

fuel gascolator. The close proximity of

the flammable fuel to the exhaust

system presents an unsafe condition and

violates current regulations. The actions

specified by this AD are intended to

prevent an airplane engine fire caused

by the close proximity of the fuel

gascolator and electric fuel pump to the

exhaust system.

DATES: Effective June 21, 1996.

The incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the

regulations is approved by the Director

of the Federal Register as of June 21,

1996.