alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**ATLANTIC SOUTHERNFINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**For the Three months Ended March 31, 2008**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This9th day of May, 2008

 

 
| /s/  Mark Stevens        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| /s/  Carol Soto          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10948]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00737]


Anchor Glass Container, Cliffwood, New Jersey; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On March 5, 1996, the Department issued a Negative Determination 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance (NAFTA-TAA) applicable to all workers of Anchor Glass 
Container located in Cliffwood, New Jersey. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on March 25, 1996 (FR 61 12101)
    By letter of March 22, 1996, counsel to the petitioner, Glass, 
Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers International Union AFL-CIO 
and its Local 119, requested administrative reconsideration of the 
Department's findings.
    The petitioners presented new evidence that was not considered in 
the original determination. The petitioners claim that the introduction 
of Mexican glass containers in the U.S. resulted in a substantial loss 
of work for Anchor Glass production facilities, and ultimately 
contributed to worker separations at the Cliffwood plant. Anchor Glass 
Container is a subsidiary of Vitro Glass, which has production 
facilities in Mexico. The petitioners claim that the Mexican production 
facilities contributed importantly to the declines in sales, 
production, and employment at the Cliffwood plant.
    Investigation findings revealed that sales, production and 
employment at the subject firm declined. The plant ceased production in 
December 1995, and the plant is scheduled to close in April 1996. The 
workers were engaged in the production of glass bottles.
    New findings on reconsideration show that the aggregate value of 
U.S. imports of glass bottles from Mexico and Canada increased annually 
from 1993 to 1995.

Conclusion

    After careful, review of the additional facts obtained on 
reconsideration, I conclude that increased imports of glass bottles 
from Mexico or Canada contributed importantly to the declines in sales 
or production and to the total or partial separation of workers of 
Anchor Glass Container, Cliffwood, New Jersey. In accordance with the 
provisions of the Act, I make the following certification:

    All workers of Anchor Glass Container, Cliffwood, New Jersey who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
January 5, 1995 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 
250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 5th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-10948 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 2 , 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00074

- CV

Tedde R. Blunck, Appellant

v.

Cathy A. Blunck, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE, AND GO ODWIN

DISMISSED AS MOOT

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on October 24, 2012. Having

reviewed the record , the Court agre es that the appeal should be dismissed . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal as moot

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this

Court and the court below.
Exhibit 32.2


                                  Certification


In connection with the periodic report of College Partnership, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John J. Grace, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


     11/17/2003                                   /s/ John J. Grace
       (Date)                                     John J. Grace
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
1 Rule 10 (Court of Appeals). Affirmance With out Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm the action of the trial court by order without rendering a formal opinion when an opinion would have no precedential value and one or more of

the following circ

umstances exist a

nd are dispositive

of the appeal: (1) the Court concurs in the facts as found or as found by necessary implic

ation by the trial c

ourt. (2) there is material evidence to support the verdict of the jury. (3) no reversibl

e error of law a

ppears. Such cases may be

affirmed as foll

ows: “Affirmed in

accordance w

ith Court of Appeal

s Rule 10(a).” 

# FILED
June 15, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON

______________________________________________ JOHN ALAN DU BAN, SR., FROM THE SHELBY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT COURT No. 60730 Plaintiff-Appella

nt, THE HONORABLE KA REN R. WILLIAMS, JUDGE Vs. C.A. No. 02A01-9712-CV-00314 AFFIRMED GARY R. WILKINSON, John Alan Du Ban, Sr ., Pro Se Defendant-Appellee. Harris, Shelton, Dunlap & Cobb James L. Kirby of M

emphis For Appellee

____________________

_______________________________________________________ _ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND ORDER

___________________________________________________________________________ CRAWFORD, J. This appeal involves a

suit by a party to a pre

vious divorce ca

se against the other party’s attorney for actions taken by the attorneyin that proceeding. Plaintiff, John Alan Du Ban, Sr., appeals the order

of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendant, Gary Wilkinson, his ex-wife’s attorney. From our review of the entire re cord in this case,

we conclude that

this is a case

that is proper for dispos

ition pursuant to Rule

10(a), Rules of th

e Court of Appeals
. I T IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the order of the trial court is affirmed i n accordance

withCourt of Appeals

Rule 10(a). Costs of appeal are assessed against the appellant for which execution may issue, if necessary.

_________________________________ W. FRANK CRAWFORD,2 PRESIDING JUDGE, W.S.

______ ________________

___________

_ ALAN E. HIGHERS, JUDGE

________________

________________

_ _ DAVID R. FARMER,

JUDGE
EXHIBIT 10.9


CONSENT
TO ASSIGNMENT


This Consent to
Assignment (the “Consent”) is given as of this 7th day of August,
2006 by Blackhawk BioFuels, LLC (“Blackhawk Biofuels”).


RECITALS: 
REG, LLC (f/k/a Renewable Energy Group, LLC) entered into an Agreement for
Pre-Construction Services dated April 26, 2006 with Blackhawk Biofuels with
respect to the construction of its biodiesel facility located in Freeport,
Illinois (the “Agreement”).


REG, LLC, InterWest,
L.C., and West Central Cooperative joined their forces to expand upon their
biodiesel construction, management and marketing efforts by creating Renewable
Energy Group, Inc. (“REG, Inc.”) on July 31, 2006.  In order to be continuing to fulfill the
obligations under the Agreement, Renewable Energy Group, Inc. would desire to
confirm Blackhawk Biofuels’ consent to an assignment of REG, LLC’s rights in
the Agreement to REG, Inc.


Performance of the
Agreement will continue under the same leadership and personnel, supported by
the same strategic partners as were involved previously under REG, LLC.  By signature hereto, Renewable Energy Group,
Inc. assumes and agrees to perform and discharge all obligations as set forth
in the Agreement previously entered into by REG, LLC with Blackhawk Biofuels.


	
  REG, LLC (f/k/a Renewable Energy Group, LLC)

  	
   

  	
  RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By

  	
  /s/ Nile Ramsbottom

  	
   

  	
  By 

  	
  /s/ Jeffrey Stroburg

  
	
   

  	
  Nile Ramsbottom, President

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Jeffrey Stroburg, CEO

  



 


CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT


Blackhawk Biofuels, LLC hereby
consents to the assignment of the Agreement to Renewable Energy Group, Inc.


	
   

  	
  BLACKHAWK BIOFUELS, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/ Ronald Mapes

  	
  Chairman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  (Title)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 243 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 243

      Recognizing and promoting awareness of Chiari malformation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2009

Mr. Kanjorski submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Recognizing and promoting awareness of Chiari malformation.

Whereas Chiari malformation, as recognized by the National Institute of 
        Neurological Disorders and Stroke, includes a complex group of disorders 
        characterized by herniation of the cerebellum;
Whereas the herniated tissue blocks the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid in 
        the brain which can lead to the formation of a cavity within the spinal 
        cord;
Whereas symptoms of Type I Chiari malformation include severe headache, 
        dizziness, vertigo, disequilibrium, visual disturbances, difficulty 
        swallowing, heart palpitations, sleep apnea, impaired fine motor skills, 
        chronic fatigue, and painful tingling of the hands and feet;
Whereas because of the complex symptomology, patients with Type I Chiari 
        malformation are frequently misdiagnosed;
Whereas Type II Chiari malformation, also called Arnold-Chiari malformation, is 
        usually accompanied by a myelomeningocele, a form of spina bifida that 
        occurs when the spinal canal and the backbone do not close before birth, 
        causing the spinal cord to protrude through an opening in the back, 
        which can result in partial or complete paralysis below the spinal 
        opening;
Whereas Type III Chiari malformation, the most serious form, results in severe 
        and often irreversible neurological defects;
Whereas treatment for this disorder is not a certain and definitive path, and 
        medication may ease certain symptoms such as pain, but often surgery is 
        the only treatment available to correct functional disturbances or halt 
        the progression of damage to the central nervous system;
Whereas until recently, Chiari malformation was regarded as a rare condition, 
        but with the increased use of magnetic resonance imaging, the number of 
        reported cases has risen from 200,000 to 2,000,000 Americans;
Whereas new genetic studies support a hereditary tendency with a 
        transmissibility rate of 12 percent; and
Whereas the studies also found that women are three times more likely to be 
        afflicted by the debilitating disorder than men: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives 
recognizes the importance of making citizens of the United States aware 
of Chiari malformation and helps promote advocacy for this important 
cause.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

I, Zhou Zong-Zheng, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of TOP Group Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated:  March 15, 2004                 By: /s/ Zhou Zong-Zheng
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Zhou Zong-Zheng
                                            Treasurer
                                           (Principal Financial and
                                            Accounting Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BAROCHS ALVARADO-MORENO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50478

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-00244-DMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. 

Barochs Alvarado-Moreno appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed

following his jury-trial conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50478

Alvarado-Moreno contends his sentence is substantively unreasonable

because the district court placed undue weight on his past convictions. The district

court did not procedurally err, and in light of the totality of the circumstances and

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively

reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v.

Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see also United States v.

Garcia-Cardenas, 555 F.3d 1049, 1050 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (rejecting

double-counting argument in § 1326 appeal).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1240]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[ORDER NO. 797]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 
(Distribution Facility); Mansfield, Texas

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from Dallas/Fort Worth International 
Airport Board, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 39, for authority to 
establish special-purpose subzone status for the distribution facility 
of Pier 1 Imports, Inc., located in Mansfield, Texas, was filed by the 
Board on February 7, 1995, and notice inviting public comment was given 
in the Federal Register (FTZ Docket 3-95, 60 FR 9004, 2/16/95); and,
    Whereas, the Board has found that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby authorizes the establishment of a 
subzone (Subzone 39D) at the Pier 1 Imports, Inc., facility in 
Mansfield, Texas, at the location described in the application, subject 
to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28. As 
indicated in the application, no processing or manufacturing will be 
conducted under zone procedures, including any such activity involving 
foreign textile products.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of January 1996.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1240 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Danny R. RAMSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47185.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 26, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 30, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 25, 1994.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing.

The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12328]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-8104-01]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(e) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(e), will be issued to Ahtna, 
Inc., for 1,361.87 acres. The lands involved are located within T. 1 
S., R. 1 E., Copper River Meridian, Alaska, in the vicinity of Copper 
Center, Alaska.
    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the ANCHORAGE DAILY NEWS. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until June 17, 1996 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, 
Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Gary L. Cunningham,
Land Law Examiner ANCSA Team Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 96-12328 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
Order entered December 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00477-CR

KEITHION DYWANE DERRICK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-25060-P

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 16, 2019 motion to extend time to file his brief. 

We GRANT the motion and extend the time to January 13, 2020. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE