alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 396 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 396

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 5, 2009.
Whereas the University of California system has become one of the largest and 
        most highly acclaimed institutions of higher learning in the world;
Whereas Founding Chancellor Carol Tomlinson-Keasey, countless individuals, 
        numerous elected officials, and an exceptional team of talented academic 
        and administrative professionals shared a vision and drive to carry 
        forward the University of California's historic mission of excellence in 
        teaching, research, and public service by assembling to build the 
        Nation's first major public research university of the 21st century in 
        Merced, California;
Whereas half of UC Merced's students are the first in their families to attend 
        college;
Whereas UC Merced celebrates having one of the most ethnically diverse research 
        campuses in the Nation;
Whereas UC Merced increases educational access and opportunities for San Joaquin 
        Valley students and will contribute to enhanced job opportunities, new 
        business development, and economic growth throughout Central California;
Whereas 518 students will comprise the first-ever graduating class from UC 
        Merced on May 16, 2009;
Whereas First Lady Michelle Obama will honor UC Merced's first graduating class 
        by delivering the commencement speech; and
Whereas the class of 2009 helped establish a thriving campus and leave UC Merced 
        highly qualified and ready to make deep and lasting marks in their 
        communities as leaders of the 21st century: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends the students comprising 
the first graduating class at the University of California, Merced, the class of 
2009, for their pioneering spirit, dedication, efforts, and desire to help 
establish an institution that puts Merced on the road to opportunity and 
promises to inspire the educational dreams of young people in this underserved 
region for generations to come.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### James H. UPTMORE, Relator, v. The FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent.

No. 94-0379.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 22, 1994.

Richard H. Ihfe and Teresa J. Waldrop, San Antonio, for relator.

William A. Jeffers, Jr., San Antonio, for respondent.

On Petition FOR Wmt of Mandamus

PER CURIAM.

This original mandamus proceeding arises out of an appeal from a trial in which proceedings were electronically recorded pursuant to this Court’s 1990 order adopting “Rules Governing the Procedure for Making a Record of Court Proceedings in Bexar County By Electronic Recording”. Rule 3 provides that the statement of facts on appeal from such proceedings is a certified copy of the recording and accompanying logs, and the exhibits. Rule 4 requires that the statement of facts be filed within 15 days of the perfection of appeal.

Relator did not file a copy of the recording with the court of appeals within 15 days of perfecting his appeal, nor did he file a timely motion for extension; but he did file the statement of facts as defined by Rule 3, as well as a transcript of the recording, within the time allowed for filing the appellate record under Tex.R.App.P. 54. The court of appeals nevertheless held that the statement of facts was not timely filed and could not be considered. 875 S.W.2d 422.

Within the time in which the appellate record must be filed under Rule 54, relator tendered not only the recordings of the proceedings, together with the exhibits and other materials, but a transcription of the recordings as well. In these circumstances, relator satisfied the requirements of the appellate rules. The appellate court abused its discretion in concluding that it was without authority to accept and consider the statement of facts. Absent mandamus relief, relator will be left with an inadequate remedy by appeal. *National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Ninth Court of Appeals,*864 S.W.2d 58, 61 (Tex.1993).

Accordingly, a majority of the Court grants relator’s motion for leave to file, and without hearing oral argument, conditionally grants his petition for writ of mandamus. Tex.R.App.P. 122. The writ will issue only if the court of appeals fails to act in accord with our opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 of ASG Consolidated LLC (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    BERNT O. BODALName:

Bernt O. BodalTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

November 20, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to ASG Consolidated LLC and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James D. GIBSON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. FERGUSON-FLORISSANT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants/Respondents.

No. 67103.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Sept. 26, 1995.

James Gibson, St. Louis, pro se.

Frank Susman, Susman, Schermer, Rim-mel & Shifrin, L.L.C., St. Louis, for respondents.

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, James D. Gibson, attempts to appeal from an order of the trial court which sustained defendant Ferguson-Florissant School District’s motion to compel settlement. Appeal dismissed.

Plaintiff originally sought an injunction ordering defendant to withdraw its decision not to renew plaintiffs teaching contract, to issue plaintiff an indefinite teaching contract, to return plaintiff to a position in the school district as a permanent teacher, and to pay plaintiff any lost salary. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed a cross motion for summary judgment. The parties then negotiated a settlement agreement. However, plaintiff refused to execute the settlement.

Defendant filed a motion to compel settlement. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion. It is this order compelling settlement from which plaintiff appeals.

“The right of appeal is statutory and an appeal may only be taken from a final judgment.” *Gaunter v. Shelton,*860 S.W.2d 843, 844 (Mo.App.E.D.1993). Because there never was an order finally disposing of the cause, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of plaintiffs appeal. *See id.*

Even if we were to consider the merits of plaintiffs appeal, he fails to brief any argument attacking the validity of the settlement agreement. Plaintiff attempts only to argue the merits of the underlying action. Allegations of error not briefed shall not be considered in any civil appeal. Rule 84.13(a).

Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

CRAHAN, P.J., and DOWD, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 386 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 386

 Commending the University of Georgia Gymnastics Team for winning the 
                    2009 NCAA National Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

Mr. Broun of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Linder, Mr. Scott 
 of Georgia, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Gingrey of 
Georgia, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, 
 and Mr. Johnson of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the University of Georgia Gymnastics Team for winning the 
                    2009 NCAA National Championship.

Whereas the University of Georgia (UGA) Gymnastics program has won its 10th 
        National Collegiate Women's Gymnastics Championship;
Whereas the University of Georgia Gymnastics program has won 16 SEC 
        Championships;
Whereas the University of Georgia Gymnastics program has produced seven Honda 
        Award winners, with Courtney Kupets under consideration as a finalist 
        for the 2009 award;
Whereas the 2009 national title is the program's fifth consecutive national 
        championship;
Whereas the Gym Dogs are now the most successful gymnastics program in the 
        country;
Whereas the University of Georgia's gymnastics team, the Gym Dogs, has made 26 
        consecutive appearances in the NCAA Gymnastics Championships;
Whereas the 2009 Gym Dogs team's overall record was an amazing 32-1;
Whereas the 2009 Gym Dogs also achieved the school's highest team GPA, 3.36;
Whereas the gymnastics team's coach, Suzanne Yoculan, is retiring as the most 
        successful collegiate gymnastics coach in NCAA history; and
Whereas Coach Suzanne Yoculan has, in 19 of her 26 years as head coach at the 
        University of Georgia, taken her squad to an SEC title, an NCAA title, 
        or both: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the University of Georgia Gymnastics Team for 
        winning the 2009 NCAA National Championship;
            (2) recognizes that the Gym Dogs have won more national 
        championships than any other program in the Nation; and
            (3) congratulates Suzanne Yoculan for a spectacular career 
        as the University of Georgia's gymnastics coach.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of Fit For Business International (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ending September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Poulsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the year ending September 30,
     2007,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
     year ending September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the financial condition and results of operations of Fit For Business
     International.

Dated: November 19, 2007


FIT FOR BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL

By: /s/ Mark Poulsen
-----------------------
Mark Poulsen
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the Report) of Com-Guard.com, Inc. (the Company) for the fisacl year ended June 30, 2004, each of the undersigned Edward W. Savarese, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 DATED: October 13, 2004
/s/ Edward SavareseEDWARD W. SAVARESE
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.8

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCFH II FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCFH II Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael
J. Short, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 11, 2006



By:

/S/ MICHAEL J. SHORTMichael J. ShortTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)




38
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5738 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5738

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary 
     concerned to pay, rather than provide reimbursement, for the 
   transportation of certain remains to two locations if the second 
                    location is a national cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2023

  Mr. Waltz (for himself, Mr. Moulton, and Mr. Mills) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary 
     concerned to pay, rather than provide reimbursement, for the 
   transportation of certain remains to two locations if the second 
                    location is a national cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abbey Gate Gold Star Families 
Dignified Transport Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT INSTEAD OF REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF 
              CERTAIN REMAINS TO TWO LOCATIONS IF THE SECOND LOCATION 
              IS A NATIONAL CEMETERY.

    Section 1482(a)(8)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking the second sentence.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (i) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended      September 30, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 8, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Ronny Yakov                               |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Name:  | Ronny      Yakov                                   |
|                        | Title: | President      and Interim Chief Financial Officer |

----
Order entered September 18, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00560-CR

No. 05-16-00561-CR

No. 05-16-00562-CR

No. 05-16-00563-CR

MERCEDES M. BIGGURS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-57650-U, F14-70586-U, F14-70971-U, F14-75674-U

ORDER

The clerk’s records filed in these appeals contain only certifications of the right to appeal 

arising from appellant’s placement on deferred adjudication in 2009 and 2014. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of 

this order, supplemental clerk’s records containing certifications of appellant’s right to appeal 

from the judgments adjudicating guilt in these proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Macon Fertilizer Works *v.*Farmers Warehouse and Fertilizer Company *et al.*

No. 3293.

January 18, 1923.

Gilbert, J.

A suit was instituted by a creditor to recover a judgment against the shareholders of au insolvent corporation, on the ground that said shareholders had organized the corporation and transacted business under the charter in the name of the corporation before the minimum capital stock had been subscribed. The case was previously in this court, when it was held that “ if at the time credit is extended the creditor knows the fact that the requisite amount of capital stock has not been subscribed, he cannot be said to have been misled, and relatively to him the subscriber to the stock would not be estopped from pleading such knowledge as a defense to a suit based on ” Civil Code (1910) § 2220. *Farmers Warehouse & Fertilizer Co.*v. *Macon Fertilizer Works,*150 *Ga.*429 (104 S. E. 207). The judgment was reversed and the case remanded to the trial court, where the controlling issue submitted was whether the creditor had knowledge of the fact that the requisite amount of the capital stock had not been subscribed. After evidence was submitted, a verdict was directed for the defendants. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, and amended the same; and the writ of error is to the judgment overruling such motion. *Meld:*

1. No cause for a reversal is shown in those grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the rulings of the court on the admissibility of evidence.

2. The evidence, without conflict, shows that the plaintiff’s agent who negotiated the sale of the fertilizer to the defendants, for the purchase-price of which judgment is sought, was fully informed that the requisite amount- of capital stock had not been subscribed before the sale was completed. Notice to such agent is notice to his principal.

3. There is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions .or inferences therefrom, demanded the verdict for the defendants as directed.

*■Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*775Equitable petition. Before Judge Gower. Ben Hill superior court. May 30, 1922.

*Eldridge Gutts*and *A. J. & J. G. McDonald,*for plaintiff.

*Ral Lawson*and *Quincey & Bice,*for defendants.'
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George SAUNDERS, Appellant.

No. WD 47603.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 3, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 28, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 15, 1994.

Patricia A. Richter, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, upon a jury trial, was convicted of the class A felony of first degree trafficking, section 195.222, RSMo Supp.1992, in selling two grams of a cocaine-based substance to an undercover police officer on November 12, 1990. Appellant was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 10.2



FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT ("Amendment") is
entered into as of July 10, 2006, by and between TECHNOLOGY SQUARE FINANCE, LLC,
a Massachusetts limited liability company ("Seller") and ARE-MA REGION
NO. 31, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Buyer").  


R E C I T A L S


WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Purchase and Sale
Contract dated as of July 3, 2006 (the "Agreement") with respect to
certain real and personal property (the "Property") located at Technology
Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts, which Property is more particularly described
in the Agreement; and 


WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer have agreed to amend the Agreement as more
particularly set forth below.


NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged by the parties, Seller and Buyer hereby amend the
Agreement as follows:


1.Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


2.Extension of Due Diligence Expiration Date.  Effective as of the date
hereof, Seller and Buyer hereby amend Section 7.3 of the Agreement to provide
that the Due Diligence Expiration Date shall be and hereby is extended from 5:00 p.m. on
July 11, 2006 to 5:00 p.m. on July 14, 2006.


3. Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterpart copies, all of which counterparts shall have the same force and
effect as if all parties hereto had executed a single copy of this Amendment.



4.Ratification.  Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.


[End of text on page]

















 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written.


SELLER:

TECHNOLOGY SQUARE FINANCE, LLC, a Massachusetts limited
liability company


By:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 

a Massachusetts charitable corporation, 

its Manager

By: /s/ Steven C. Marsh   

Name:  Steven C. Marsh 

Its: Managing Director, Real Estate













BUYER:


ARE-MA REGION NO. 31, LLC, a Delaware limited

liability company



By:Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., 

a Delaware limited partnership, 

its Managing Member


By:ARE-QRS Corp., 

a Maryland corporation,

its General Partner


By:  /s/ Jennifer Pappas 

Name:  Jennifer Pappas

Its:V.P. & Assistant Secreatary













Acknowledgement by Escrow Agent



Escrow Agent acknowledges the terms of the foregoing Amendment, and agrees to
continue to be bound by those terms of the Agreement applicable to the Escrow
Agent.


ESCROW AGENT:



Chicago Title Insurance Company



By:  /s/ Gus Aguilar

Name:  Gus Aguilar 

Its:  Senior Escrow Officer