alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22078-22079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11884]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 22079]]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 5/
3/96

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions -of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1321.
    Date filed: April 29, 1996.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: COMP Telex Mail Vote 800. Amend Rounding Units--Mexico. 
Intended effective date: June 1, 1996.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1322.
    Date filed: April 29, 1996.
    Parties:Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC31 Telex Mail Vote 799. Reso 010m--San Francisco-Hong 
Kong fare alignment. Intended effective date: June 1, 1996.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1323.
    Date filed: April 29, 1996.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC31 Telex Mail Vote 801. Japan-North America/Caribbean 
fares, r-1- 074r r-3- 091p, r-2- 085tt r-4- 010c. Intended effective 
date: May 20, 1996.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1324.
    Date filed: April 29, 1996.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC12 Reso/P 1743 dated April 26, 1996; TC12 Reso/P 1744 
dated April 26, 1996. Mid Atlantic-Europe/Middle East Expedited Resos.

    Docket Number: OST-96-1330.
    Date filed: May 1, 1996.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: COMP Reso 024f. Local Currency Fare Changes--Botswana. 
Intended effective date: June 1, 1996.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 96-11884 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 264 

Expressing the opposition of the House of Representatives to any proposal 

intended to alter current law to allow the Department of Veterans Affairs 

to bill third-party insurers of veterans who are being treated for serviceconnected disabilities or injuries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2009 

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. BUYER, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Mr. 

FRELINGHUYSEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the opposition of the House of Representatives 

to any proposal intended to alter current law to allow 

the Department of Veterans Affairs to bill third-party 

insurers of veterans who are being treated for serviceconnected disabilities or injuries. 

Whereas section 1729 of title 38, United States Code, states 

that the Department of Veterans Affairs may only recover costs from a veteran’s private insurer for treatment 

of a non-service-connected disability; 

Whereas nationally recognized veterans service organizations 

have expressed serious concern about a policy proposed 

by President Obama that would allow the Department of 

Veterans Affairs to bill a veteran’s private insurer for the 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 264 IH 

care and treatment of a disability or injury that was determined to have been incurred in or aggravated by the 

veteran’s military service; 

Whereas nearly three out of every four of the 25,000,000 veterans still living have served during a war or an official 

period of hostility; 

Whereas the mission of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

is ‘‘to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and 

for his widow, and his orphan’’; 

Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs has committed 

to providing veterans ‘‘the world-class benefits and services they have earned—and to do so by adhering to the 

highest standards of compassion, commitment, excellence, 

professionalism, integrity, accountability, and stewardship’’; and 

Whereas any proposal intended to bill veterans for the care 

of their service-connected disabilities ignores the solemn 

promise and obligation the United States of America has 

to care for the brave men and women who have served 

the country honorably and have risked their lives and 

physical well-being to ensure the freedom of its people: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives opposes 

2 any proposal intended to alter current law to allow the 

3 Department of Veterans Affairs to bill third-party insurers 

4 of veterans who are being treated for service-connected 

5 disabilities or injuries determined to have been incurred 

6 in or aggravated by the veteran’s military service. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24308-24309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11988]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 24309]]

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than May 28, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Gregory J. Dahlgren , Vergas, Minnesota; to retain a total of 30 
percent of the voting shares of Vergas Bancorporation, Inc., Vergas, 
Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain shares of Vergas State Bank, 
Vergas, Minnesota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. James L. Truck, Kingwood, Texas; to acquire an additional 3.2 
percent, for a total of 27.1 percent of the voting shares of Brazosport 
Corporation, Corpus Christi, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
First Commerce Bank, Corpus Christi, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 8, 1996.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-11988 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24914-24915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12380]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Feed Grain Donations; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort 
Berthold Indian Reservation of North Dakota

AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation 
(CCC) is announcing that the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort 
Berthold Indian Reservation of North Dakota is an acute distress area 
and that CCC-owned feed grain will be donated to needy livestock owners 
on the reservation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Diel, Agricultural Program 
Specialist, Farm Service Agency, AG Box Code 0527, P.O. Box 2415, 
Washington, DC 20013-2415, 202-720-6605.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority set forth in 
section 407 of the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
1427), and Executive Order 11336, notice is being given that it is 
determined that:
    1. The chronic economic distress of the needy members of the Three 
Affiliated Tribes using the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation of North 
Dakota has been materially increased and become

[[Page 24915]]

acute because of hail storms, wind, and excess rain thereby severely 
affecting livestock feed production and causing increased economic 
distress. This reservation is utilized by members of the Three 
Affiliated Tribes for grazing purposes.
    2. The use of feed grain or products thereof made available by CCC 
for livestock feed for such needy members of the Three Affiliated 
Tribes using the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation will not displace or 
interfere with normal marketing of agricultural commodities.
    3. Based on the above determinations, the Fort Berthold Indian 
Reservation of North Dakota is declared an acute distress area and the 
donation of feed grain owned by the CCC is authorized to livestock 
owners who are determined by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, United 
States Department of the Interior, to be needy members of the Three 
Affiliated Tribes utilizing such lands. These donations by the CCC may 
commence upon May 8, 1996, and shall be made available through June 15, 
1996, or such other date as may be stated in a notice issued by the 
Executive Vice President, CCC.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on May 9, 1996.
Grant Buntrock,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 96-12380 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
Case 4:17-cr-01697-JAS-BPV Document 1 Filed 10/04/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. I

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Florida Holding Co. I (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 7, 2008



By:

/s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. StockwellPrincipal Financial Officer
#### Robert E. NAVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50566.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 30, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

*426Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.6

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY FLORIDA HOLDING CO. II

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Florida Holding Co. II (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2008



By:

/S/ TRACEY L. STOCKWELLTracey L. StockwellPrincipal Financial Officer




37
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12286]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-29,743 & 743G]


IBM Corporation, Enterprise Systems, Large Scale Computing 
Systems Division and its Successors, Poughkeepsie, New York and 
Integrated Systems Solutions Corporation (ISSC), Division #07 (Formerly 
Division #26), Wappingers Falls, New York; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    On March 23, 1995, the Department of Labor issued a Notice of 
Revised Determination on Reconsideration, applicable to all workers at 
IBM Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on April 5, 1995 (60 FR 17371). The certification 
was subsequently amended to include other locations and divisions of 
the subject firm. The amended notices were published in the Federal 
Register on June 29, 1995 (60 FR 33850), and December 15, 1995 (60 FR 
64454).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
workers of the Wappingers Falls, New York location of Integrated 
Systems Solutions Corporation (ISSC), Division #07 (formerly Division 
#26), provided support services to IBM Corporation, Enterprise Systems, 
Large Scale Computing Systems Division. ISSC is a separate corporate 
entity wholly owned by IBM.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who are adversely affected by increased 
imports. Accordingly, the Department is again amending the 
certification to include the workers of ISSC, Division #07 (formerly 
Division #26), who provided support services to IBM.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-29,743 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Enterprise Systems, Large Scale Computing Systems 
Division, and its successors, of IBM Corporation located in 
Poughkeepsie, New York (TA-W-29,743), and workers of Integrated 
Systems Solutions Corporation (ISSC), Division #07 (formerly 
Division #26), Wappingers Falls, New York providing support services 
to IBM Corporation, the Enterprise Systems, Large Scale Computing 
Systems Division, and its successors who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after March 23, 1993, are eligible 
to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade 
Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 29th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-12286 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00266

- CV

___________________________

O r iginal P roceeding Criminal District Court No. 4 of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1394791D
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### K EVIN 

### E LIJAH 

### S TEPHEN 

### , Relator1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator filed this mandamus proceeding asking that we c omp el t h e trial court to rule on the merits of his habeas application or forward his application to the Court of Criminal Appeals

. Relator asserts that he was arrested on a parole revocation war rant but has not received a parole revocation hearing and that he fi le d a n application for habeas relief on which the trial court has taken no a ction

. Th is court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief m ust be denied. Alt hough p arole is a form of rest raint from whic h an app licant may pursue post

- con viction remedies under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07 , only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant such relief

. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art
. 11.07; Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex re l. Keene v . C t. of Ap p
. for Eighth Dist. , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483

– 84 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Neither this court nor the trial court may determine the merits of relator ’s habeas application

. See Keene , 910 S.W. 2 d at 484 ;

c f. In r e Belton , No. 12

- 13

- 00293

- CR , 2014 WL 2003108, at * 2 (Tex. App

. — Tyler May 14, 2014, orig. proceeding

) ( mem . op.) (holding that the trial court had no duty to rule on Belton ’s mandamus pet ition based on parole revocation irre gularities because the trial cou rt had no ju risdic tion t o gr ant relief). Further, w e have no a uthority to compel the trial court to rule on any matters related to relator ’s pending application or to compel the trial court clerk to forward relator ’s application to the Court of Criminal Ap peals

. See T ex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; In re S heppard , No. 02

- 1 7

-2

00141

- CV, 2017 WL 2351094, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth May 5, 2017, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (st ating that this court has no m andamus jurisdiction over trial court clerk); In re Bluitt , No. 02

- 13

- 0 0420

- CV, 2013 WL 657914 2, at *1 (Tex. Ap p.
— Fort Worth Dec. 13, 2013, orig. proceeding ) (per curiam) ( mem. op. ) (noting that applicant com plaining about c onv icting court ’s inaction on habeas petition should seek mandamus relief f rom the Court of Criminal Ap p eals )

. Accordingly, r elator’s peti tion for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam Delivered : September 10, 2021
#### Arema Margaret SPELLING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas.

No. 0007-87.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Sept. 14, 1988.

Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2, Tarrant County, L. Clifford Davis, J.

Prior report: Tex.App., 719 S.W.2d 404.

On appellant’s petition for discretionary review: judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed; cause remanded to that court.

CLINTON and DUNCAN, JJ., concur in the result.

ONION, P.J., dissents to the remand and to order improvidently granting ground no. 2.

TEAGUE, J., dissents.
H. Res. 303 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 31, 2009. 

Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office 

of Representative from the First Congressional District of 

Hawaii is dismissed. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report
      of
      ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
      March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and





2.  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      LLC.








*Dated:*  *May
      21, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Manager


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 25482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12656]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the DoD Advisory on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION. Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group A (Microwave Devices) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 1800-2100, Thursday, May 23, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Monterey, 
Windjammer I, Old Golf Course Rd., Monterey, CA 93940.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Gelnovatch, AGED Secretariat, 
1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Advance Research 
Projects Agency (ARPA) and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The Working Group A meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the Military Departments propose to 
initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This 
microwave device area includes programs on developments and research 
related to microwave tubes, solid state microwave devices, electronic 
warfare devices, millimeter wave devices, and passive devices. The 
review will include details of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this Advisory 
Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1) 
(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the 
public.

    Dated: May 15, 1996.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison OFficer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-12656 Filed 5-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John WILLIAMS, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67647.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Dec. 5, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 17, 1996.

Cynthia A. Howlett, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

*352
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant John Williams appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of involuntary manslaughter in violation of § 565.024 RSMo 1986 and armed criminal action in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1986. He was sentenced to a term of seven years imprisonment and fined $250 for involuntary manslaughter and twenty-five years imprisonment on the armed criminal action charge, the sentences to run concurrently.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).