alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Larry Kurlender, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of VisualMED Clinical Solutions Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the Consolidated Financial Statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave: 

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occured during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: September 28, 2007

|   | /s/    Larry Kurlender |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | Name:                  | Larry Kurlender  |
|   | Title:                 | Principal Financial Officer, |
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5867 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in Casselberry, Florida, as the ‘‘Colonel Joseph William Kittinger II Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5867 EH

1 SECTION 1. COLONEL JOSEPH WILLIAM KITTINGER II POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in 

5 Casselberry, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Colonel Joseph William Kittinger II Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Colonel Joseph Wil12 liam Kittinger II Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5867 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postliam Kittinger II Post Office Building’’. Casselberry, Florida, as the ‘‘Colonel Joseph Wil- al Service located at 109 Live Oaks Boulevard in
#### Edward E. EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41608.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 12, 1989.

Betsy A. Clarke, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before NUGENT, C.J., and FENNER, J., and WASSERSTROM, Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24321-24322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12013]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Intent To Negotiate Contracts Among the Central Utah 
Water Conservancy District, Wasatch County Water Service Area No. 1, 
and Department of the Interior for Irrigation Water and Municipal and 
Industrial Water From the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project, 
Utah

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary--Water and Science, 
Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to negotiate contracts among the Central Utah 
Water Conservancy District (CUWCD), Wasatch County Water Service Area 
No. 1 (WCWSA1), and Department of the Interior (DOI) for Irrigation 
Water and Municipal and Industrial Water from the Bonneville Unit of 
the Central Utah Project.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public Law 102-575 Section 202(a)(3)(E) stipulates that: 
``Amounts authorized to carry out subparagraph (B) may not be obligated 
or expended, and may not be borrowed against, until binding contracts 
for the purchase of at least 90 percent of the supplemental

[[Page 24322]]

irrigation project water to be delivered from the features constructed 
under subparagraph (B) have been executed.'' Subparagraph B relates to 
construction of the Wasatch County Water Efficiency Project, Central 
Utah Project. A negotiated contract among CUWCD, WCWSA1, and DOI will 
meet the requirements of Section 202(a)(3)(E).

DATES: Dates for public negotiation sessions will be announced in local 
newspapers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information on matters 
related to this Federal Register notice can be obtained at the address 
and telephone number set forth below: Mr. Reed Murray, Program 
Coordinator, CUP Completion Act Office, Department of the Interior, 302 
East 1860 South, Provo UT 84606-6154, Telephone: (801) 379-1237, 
Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96e4fbe3e4e4f7efd6e3f5b8e3e5f4e4b8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c2e31292e2e3d251c293f72292f3e2e723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
Ronald Johnston,
CUP Program Director, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 96-12013 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
-) 1,132-02-

D-£G-x: HoMorcx^k ClerK, A.p£JL^/~<2C>/^

J tiA\/e R.g-cieiVed This i_p|i«»r Mpcx-4 firo/^

Leo/U Cpun-t-y OLsfrrcf ClerK 6evev-ty VJi\SQ/J. <^ fiflcW y

,Sfo.4e/Ni^ She has fprufc-rglej My /Lo1 Dr/1-

UA)/P Mn4- Receiver} A uK?W Ca^l Pro/u -fh?

fru^V nC criM^nal Appals, IT A/u £e^ug.sl/'fj^ ITf

you cp\k! Please Se.KjJ Me Q/Oe,

Also J./K /^e^o-es-f/AJj -Por Aa/ ijjp \)a\<>A Dnrkrl 5>h?ef -Par My nuikl fie cr^A.

P)f..cc5e. U.Se fhe 5efP AsUrgs^s 5JAMP £a/x/W/>£ fW 'fh-e.

__6gj-UHJg J X^forMA-lvoAJ,

TnAKjK Vq^ f^r Voar 77m^

/-joNJorcJjk C|<?rK;

Abe) flcoS^A

TD.dtel^

SpujiMi^ *w**?ft 'gib F/n 3$a4 H^vHiej^W^

££1

Coor-V CfluuSeffi CM-JP-aHl- 1

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APFEALS-

-APR23 2015

AbelAcosta,Clerk
87th, 278th, 369th Judicial Districts

April 13,2015

Leon County District Clerk

139 East Main-Street

P. O. Box 39

Centerville, Texas 75833

Office (903) 536-2227

Fax (903)536-5058

Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Texas . . . ._ '..

PO Box 12308, Capital Station

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Trial Court Writ of Habeas Corpus # CM-10-241 -1

Trial Court Cause # CM-10-241

Ex Parte: John William Spurlock

Dear Honorable Clerk,

Enclosed, please find the Clerk'sRecord on theApplication for 11.07 Writof Habeas Corpus on

the above referenced cause.

Should you need further information, please contact my office at 903-536-2227.

Sincerely,

Beverly Wils&r

Leon County District Clerk

cc: Honorable Hope Knight

Leon County District Attorney

PO Box 1010

Centerville, Texas 75833

John William Spurlock #01678212

Wynne Unit

810 FM 2821 •.

Huntsville, Texas 77349

ArrIt«a/-aoir

AM *qp^ ao/5 T^Oc^S&P&Q

ys£,S^^i4
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-201-CV

REBECCA DAVIS AND REBECCA 	APPELLANT

DAVIS AS NEXT FRIEND OF M.V.	

	V.

LINDA RAWLINGS	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF PARKER COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant, Rebecca Davis, filed suit against Appellee, Linda Rawlings, for the death of her daughter’s dog.  Appellee filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, disposing of Appellant’s claims against Appellee.  Appellant now appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by granting the motion for summary judgment.  Because we hold that Appellant produced no evidence that Appellee owed a duty to Appellant, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

	In Appellee’s motion for summary judgment, she alleged, among other things, that Appellant had no evidence that Appellee owed a duty to Appellant.  Our review of the record under the proper standard2 reveals that Appellant did not produce any evidence that a duty was owed.3  Furthermore, Appellant does not complain to this Court that a duty was owed.4  The trial court, therefore, did not err by finding as a matter of law that Appellee owed no duty to Appellant and disposing of Appellant’s negligence claims.5

	From our review of the record and briefs, we cannot discern that Appellant brought any other causes of action.  To the extent that she did, any challenge to summary judgment on such claims fails for inadequate briefing.6  Consequently, we overrule Appellant’s sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

								LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

								JUSTICE

PANEL B:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  March 4, 2004
Case 2:17-cr-01444-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cr-01444-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-cr-01444-JAT Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 3 of 3
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RANDALL CHARLES PLACE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4804

)

SARA ELIZABETH HANLEY, )

individually and on behalf of C.E.P., )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 20, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Collier County; Elizabeth V. Krier, 

Judge.

Susan J. Silverman, Sarasota, for 

Appellant.

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM JASON TEETS, )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-141

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 27, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; John K. Stargel, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Gary R. Gossett, Jr., Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Jason M. Miller, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12422]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Fossil Energy
[Docket No. FE C&E 96-03--Certification Notice-151]


Mid-Georgia Cogen, L.P.; Notice of Filing of Coal Capability 
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 2, 1996, Mid-Georgia Cogen, L.P., submitted a coal 
capability self-certification pursuant to section 201 of the Powerplant 
and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, as amended.

ADDRESSES: Copies of self-certification filings are available for 
public inspection, upon request, in the Office of Fuels Programs, 
Fossil Energy, Room 3F-056, FE-52, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Russell at (202) 586-9624.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of the Powerplant and Industrial 
Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.), 
provides that no new baseload electric powerplant may be constructed or 
operated without the capability to use coal or another alternate fuel 
as a primary energy source. In order to meet the requirement of coal 
capability, the owner or operator of such facilities proposing to use 
natural gas or petroleum as its primary energy source shall certify, 
pursuant to FUA section 201(d), to the Secretary of Energy prior to 
construction, or prior to operation as a base load powerplant, that 
such powerplant has the capability to use coal or another alternate 
fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with section 201(a) as 
of the date filed with the Department of Energy. The Secretary is 
required to publish a notice in the Federal Register that a 
certification has been filed. The following owner/operator of a 
proposed new baseload powerplant has filed a self-certification in 
acccordance with section 201(d).
    Owner: Mid-Georgia Cogen, L.P.
    Operator: Mid-Georgia Cogen, L.P.
    Location: Houston County, Georgia.
    Plant Configuration: Combined cycle--topping cycle cogeneration.
    Capacity: 323 megawatts.
    Fuel: Natural gas.
    Purchasing Entities: Georgia Power Company.
    In-Service Date: March 1, 1998.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., May 13, 1996.
Anthony J. Como,
Director, Office of Coal & Electricity, Office of Fuels Programs, 
Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 96-12422 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
exv10wp



 








EXHIBIT 10.P




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

EL PASO CORPORATION

2005 COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS




     WHEREAS, El Paso Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the El Paso Corporation 2005
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective as of May 26, 2005 (the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.7 of the Plan, the Board of Directors or the “Management
Committee” (as defined in the Plan) may from time to time make such amendments to the Plan as
either of them may deem proper and in the best interests of the Company;



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to clarify Section 4.2 of the Plan to reflect the intent of the
Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee with respect to adjustments in the number of
authorized shares under the Plan.



     NOW THEREFORE, the following amendment shall be made to the Plan:



     Section 4.2 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



     “4.2 Adjustments to Number of Shares



              In the event of a recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, exchange of shares,
merger, reorganization, change in corporate structure or shares of the Company or similar
event, the Board, upon recommendation of the Management Committee, shall make such
adjustments, if any, as it determines are appropriate and equitable to (i) the number of
shares authorized for issuance under the Plan and (ii) the number of shares allocated under
the Common Stock Deferral (as defined in Section 6.2). Any such adjustment shall be final,
binding and conclusive on all persons claiming any right or interest under the Plan.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, effective as of October 26, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	EL PASO CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Susan B. Ortenstone	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Susan B. Ortenstone	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Its Senior Vice President, Human Resources	 	 
	 	 	 	 	and Administration	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ David L. Siddall
 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Corporate Secretary
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-46108) pertaining to the amended and restated 1998 Stock Plan
and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Stanford Microdevices, Inc. of our
report dated January 18, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Stanford Microdevices, Inc., included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 26, 2001
#### Jerry WRIGHT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 69223.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 10, 1996.

John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant-respondent.

' Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel without an evidentiary hearing. On February 23, 1993, pursuant to a plea bargain, Movant pleaded guilty to three counts of sale of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and ordered Movant placed on probation for five years. On September 8, 1994, the trial court revoked Mov-ant’s probation and sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment on each count, the first two to run consecutively, the third to run concurrent to the first two. Movant alleges the motion court erred when it denied his 24.035 motion because his original plea bargain was five years on each count to run concurrently, while the sentence after his parole revocation was for a total of sixteen years’ imprisonment, thus rendering his guilty pleas unknowing and involuntary. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0043

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CORY ANN RUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until August 11, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2022

07/14/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0043
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company II, LLC (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Gary L. WhitlockGary
      L. WhitlockPresident
      and Manager(Principal
      Executive Officer)November
      12, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20766-20767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11410]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[EE-106-82]
RIN 1545-AE45


Loans to Plan Participants; Hearing

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of a public hearing on proposed 
regulations relating to loans made from a qualified employer plan to 
plan participants or beneficiaries.

DATES: The public hearing will be held on Friday, June 28, 1996, 
beginning at 10 a.m. Requests to speak and outlines or oral comments 
must be received by Friday, June 7, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be held in the Internal Revenue 
Service Auditorium, Seventh Floor, 7400 Corridor, Internal Revenue 
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Requests to 
speak and outlines of oral comments should be mailed to the Internal 
Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Attn: 
CC:DOM:CORP:R [EE 106-82], room 5226, Washington, DC 20044.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Vasquez of Regulations Unit, 
Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-6803 (not a toll-free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of the public hearing is 
proposed amendments to the Income Tax Regulations under section 72 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The proposed regulations appeared in 
the Federal Register for Thursday, December 21, 1995 (60 FR 66233).
    The rules of Sec. 601.601(a)(3) of the ``Statement of Procedural 
Rules'' (26 CFR Part 601) shall apply with respect to the public 
hearing. Persons who have submitted written comments within the

[[Page 20767]]

time prescribed in the notice of proposed rulemaking and who also 
desire to present oral comments at the hearing on the proposed 
regulations should submit not later than Friday, June 7, 1996, an 
outline of the oral comments/testimony to be presented at the hearing 
and the time they wish to devote to each subject.
    Each speaker (or group of speakers representing a single entity) 
will be limited to 10 minutes for an oral presentation exclusive of the 
time consumed by the questions from the panel for the government and 
answer thereto.
    Because of controlled access restrictions, attenders cannot be 
admitted beyond the lobby of the Internal Revenue Building until 9:45 
a.m.
    An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will be made after 
outlines are received from the persons testifying. Copies of the agenda 
will be available free of charge at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 96-11410 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U