alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5882 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5882

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rehabilitation 
      credit to allow such credit to be taken in one taxable year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 3, 2023

Mr. Carey (for himself and Mr. Schneider) introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

              Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rehabilitation 
      credit to allow such credit to be taken in one taxable year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF ONE-YEAR REHABILITATION CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 47(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) General Rule.--For purposes of section 46, the rehabilitation 
credit for any taxable year is 20 percent of the qualified 
rehabilitation expenditures with respect to any certified historic 
structure.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135341 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135341 COA: 279049 Wayne CC: 90-009070-01 92-000404-01 ROBY DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Thomas W. Colligan, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of YACHT FINDERS, INC.
(the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.    
The Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.    
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 6th
day of May, 2010.





/s/
      Thomas W. ColliganThomas
      W. ColliganChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
YACHT FINDERS, INC. and will be retained by YACHT FINDERS, INC. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) The Boeing Company ) ASBCA No. 59582 ) Under Contract No. N00019-07-C-0035 

### et al. ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. Seth H. Locke, Esq.

Perkins Coie LLP Washington, DC
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

Deputy ChiefTrial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 14 July 2015

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 59582, Appeal ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Don Stone, Relators v. The Honorable Donald J. FLOYD, Judge, Respondent.

No. 94-1244.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 7, 1995.

Patrick W. O’Briant, Houston, Warren Taylor, Houston, and Joseph F. Nistico, Jr., Houston, for relators.

Glen W. Morgan, Beaumont and Alto W. Watson, II, Beaumont, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In the suit underlying this original proceeding, Billie LaBorde claims that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and its agent, Don Stone, acted in bad faith in refusing to provide uninsured motorist benefits under her policy. State Farm and Stone filed various motions, including a motion to sever and a motion for protection, asking the trial court to postpone any proceedings on the bad faith claim pending a judicial determination of State Farm’s liability under the *493policy. The trial court overruled the motions.

We believe the parties and the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider their positions in light of our decision today in *Republic Insurance Co. v. Stoker,*903 S.W.2d 338 (Tex.1995). Accordingly, a majority of the Court overrules the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus, without prejudice to the right of any party to seek relief in this Court after any further developments in the trial court.
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Kolesar & Leatham, Chtd. Man J. Lefebvre Marquis Aurbach Coffing Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5694 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5694

  Making appropriations for the salaries and expenses of certain U.S. 
  Customs and Border Protection employees working during a Government 
         shutdown in fiscal year 2024, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2023

  Ms. De La Cruz (for herself, Mr. Van Drew, Ms. Mace, Mrs. Bice, Mr. 
  Pfluger, Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Moylan, Mr. 
Mills, Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. Luttrell, Mr. D'Esposito, Mr. Cuellar, 
 Mrs. Houchin, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Self, and Mr. 
   Steube) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Making appropriations for the salaries and expenses of certain U.S. 
  Customs and Border Protection employees working during a Government 
         shutdown in fiscal year 2024, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay Our Border Patrol and Customs 
Agents Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF SALARIES OF CERTAIN CBP EMPLOYEES WORKING DURING A 
              GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.

    There are appropriated for fiscal year 2024, out of any money in 
the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are necessary to 
pay, during any period of a lapse in discretionary appropriations 
during such fiscal year beginning on or after the date of the enactment 
of this section, the salaries and expenses of any Agents of the U.S. 
Border Patrol and officers of the Office of Field Operations within 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection excepted from furlough during such 
lapse.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Blake OWENS, Appellant.

No. 64580.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 11, 1994.

Marc D. Lund, St. Charles, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, C.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Blake Owens, appeals from a jury verdict entered in the Circuit Court of Madison County, finding appellant guilty of possession of a prohibited article in violation of RSMo § 217.360.1(4) (Supp.1993) for which appellant was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender with said sentence to run consecutively to the sentence appellant is presently serving. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the cir*437cuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Gregory A. Pitner, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 15, 2005 |  | EarthBlock Technologies, IncBY: /S/ Gregory A. Pitner
Gregory A. PitnerChief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- --------- --------

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb $>tate~ '!Court of §ppeaI~

for toe jfeberaI '!Circuit

KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

2012-5106, -5115

Appeals from the United States Court of Federal

Claims in case no. 09-CV-351, Judge Christine O.C.

Miller.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ("Kellogg

Brown") moves unopposed for leave to establish a timetable for filing amicus briefs in support of Kellogg Brown.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

Case: 12-5106 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2012
KELLOGG BROWN &ROOT SERVICES v. US 2

The motion is denied without prejudice to any

party seeking leave to file an amicus brief within the time

frame provided for by Fed. R. App. P. 29(e) or out of time.

For The Court

SEP 252m2

Date

cc: J. Reid Prouty, Esq.

John P. Elwood, Esq.

s25

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

u.s. couRft~~EALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

SEP 25 2011

JAN HORBALV

CLERK

Case: 12-5106 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2012
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25229-25230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12508]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 25230]]

amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Cancer Institute Frederick Cancer Research & 
Development Center Advisory Committee.
    The open portion of the meeting will be limited to space available. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
notify the contact person in advance of the meeting.

    Committee Name: Frederick Cancer Research & Development Center 
Advisory Committee.
    Date: June 3-4, 1996.
    Place: Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, 
Building 549, Executive Board Room, Frederick, MD 21702.
    Open: June 3, 1996-8:30 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    Agenda: Discussion of administrative matters such as future 
meetings, budget, and information items related to the operation of 
the NCI Frederick Research and Development Center.
    Closed: June 3, 1996-11 a.m. to adjournment; June 4, 1996-8 a.m. 
to adjournment.
    Agenda: Discussion of previous site visit report and response 
for the Macromolecular Structure Laboratory with Advanced BioScience 
Laboratories, Inc.--Basic Research Program and the Structural 
Biochemistry Program with Science Applications International 
Corporation. The majority of the closed session will be devoted to a 
review of contractor technical support programs at NCI FCRDC.
    Contact Person: Cedric W. Long, Ph.D., Frederick Cancer Research 
and Development Center, P.O. Box B, Frederick, MD 21702, telephone: 
301-846-1108.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
reports and the discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets 
or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the programs, 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion 
of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control.)

    Dated: May 10, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-12508 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5927 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5927

To require the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw certain documents 
                       relating to grizzly bears.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2023

               Mr. Newhouse introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw certain documents 
                       relating to grizzly bears.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATING TO GRIZZLY BEARS.

    The Secretary of the Interior--
            (1) shall withdraw the proposed rule of the United States 
        Fish and Wildlife Service titled ``Endangered and Threatened 
        Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential 
        Experimental Population of Grizzly Bear in the North Cascades 
        Ecosystem, Washington State'' (88 Fed. Reg. 67193; published 
        September 29, 2023); and
            (2) shall withdraw and terminate the preparation of the 
        draft Environmental Impact Statement of the National Park 
        Service and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service titled 
        ``Draft Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan / Environmental Impact 
        Statement'' (published September 2023).
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Reyes, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered April 20, 1988, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of imprisonment of from *IV-i*to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was indicted for the forcible theft of $20 from one of his two victims. Testimony was elicited that he had also appropriated a pack of cigarettes as he went through the victim’s pockets. The Trial Judge instructed the jury, over defense objection, that they had to find, *inter alia,*that defendant had stolen a $20 bill *and*cigarettes, as testified. This overburdening of the jury turned out not only to be inconsequential, but, if anything, inured to defendant’s benefit, since it required the jury to find more than was charged in the indictment. There is absolutely no basis for defendant’s argument that the jury took this instruction to mean that they could find robbery based upon the theft of money "or” cigarettes; nor is there any reason to think that the instruction had any effect on defendant’s conviction of attempted robbery of this victim’s companion, from whom no property was taken.

The prosecutor’s further exploration, on redirect examination, into the circumstances surrounding a "violation” conviction of one of the victims a year before the occurrence of this crime was fully justified by defendant’s exploration of that incident on cross-examination *(People v Regina,*19 NY2d 65), and did not amount to an attempt to absolve her of the disorderly conduct for which she had been convicted. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 96 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24789-24790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12281]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration


Extension of Comment Period on Concept for Purchase of Non-
Hydropower Renewable Resources and Solicitation of Interest

AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Western Area Power Administration is extending the comment 
period fifteen(15) days on its Concept for Purchase of Non-hydropower 
Renewable Resources and Solicitation of Interest published in the 
Federal Register on April 15, 1996 (61FR16480). The April 15, 1996, 
Federal Register notice requested comments on Western adopting a policy 
to purchase a portion of its expected purchase power requirements, on a 
project-by-project basis and in a competitive manner, from non-
hydropower renewable resource producers.

DATES: To be considered, comments and other input in response to the 
Federal Register notice published on April 15, 1996, need to be 
received by Western by close of business on May 31, 1996. Comments 
should be addressed to: Michael S. Cowan, Acting Chief Program Officer, 
Western Area Power Administration, P.O. Box 3402, Golden, CO 80401.


[[Page 24790]]


    Issued at Golden, Colorado, May 7, 1996.
J. M. Shafer,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-12281 Filed 5-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Stephen Charles ROMEY, Respondent, v. Pamela Jean JOHNSON (Romey), Appellant.

No. WD 48890.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 13, 1994.

Vincent F. Igoe, Allison K. Blessing, Withers, Brant, Igoe & Mullennix, P.C., Liberty, for respondent.

Deborah A. Tooley, Gleason & Tooley, Kansas City, for appellant.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from trial court’s order of modification of child custody.

Judgment Affirmed. 84.16(b).
Exhibit 23.1
                                 ------------

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-
122536 on Form F-3, as amended, of our report dated June 29, 2005, (which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
which states that accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, the basis on which the consolidated financial statement
have been prepared, differ in certain material respects from accounting
principles generally accepted in India which form the basis of the Company's
general purpose financial statements) relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Rediff.com India Limited and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the three years in
the period ended March 31, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F
of Rediff.com India Limited and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31,
2005.

DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS

Mumbai, India
June 29, 2005