alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JASON LLABAN CANASTRA,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00313-CR

Appeal from the

379th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC#2023CR5454)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 20TH DAY OF MAY 2024.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 10.1
 EXECUTION VERSION
 SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 Supplemental Indenture Deerfield Capital LLC, Deerfield Triarc Capital LLC Company The Bank of New York
Trust Company, National Association JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association) Trustee
 Indenture
 Section 1.1 Section 1.5(b) Section 5.1
  Section 9.2
 
 Section 1.01 Consolidated Net Worth Section 1.1
 Consolidated Net Worth
 Section 1.02 Corporate Trust Office Section 1.1
 Corporate Trust Office th




---



##### 



Section 1.03 Section 1.1
 Guarantor
 Section 1.04 Section 1.1
 Management Company
 Maximum Indebtedness Section 10.9(c)
 Seller Notes
 Section 1.05 Section 1.5(b)
  Section 1.06 Section 5.1 Section 5.1(e) Section 5.1(f) Section 5.1(g)
  Section 1.07
  Section 1.08 Section 10.6(d)
 2




---



##### 



Minimum Consolidated Net Worth
 Section 1.09 Section 10.7 Section 10.6 Section 10.6 10.9 10.10
 Section 1.10 Sections 10.9 10.10
 Management Company Covenants
  provided, however Section 10.9(b)
 Maximum Indebtedness provided, however,
 3




---



##### 



Seller Notes
 provided Section 10.9(c)
 
 Section 2.01 TPF III TPF V Section 10.7 Section
10.6(d)
 Section 2.02
 Section 2.03
 4




---



##### 



Section 2.04 Sections 1.2 9.3 Sections 1.2 9.3
 Section 2.05
 Section 2.06
 Section 2.07
 Section 2.08
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
 5




---



##### 



DEERFIELD CAPITAL LLC,as CompanyBy:
    
    /s/ Robert C. GrienName: Robert C. GrienTitle: President
 THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUSTCOMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as TrusteeBy:
    
    /s/ Maria D. CalzadoName: Maria D. CalzadoTitle: Vice President
 THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUSTCOMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Property Trustee(as to Section 2.01 only)By:
    
    /s/ Maria D. CalzadoName: Maria D. CalzadoTitle: Vice President
 DEERFIELD CAPITAL TRUST I(as to Section 2.01 only)By:
    
    /s/ Robert C. GrienName: Robert C. GrienTitle: Administrative TrusteeAttest: /s/ Robert A. ContrerasBy: Robert A. Contreras




---



##### 



TABERNA PREFERRED FUNDING III, LTD.(as to Section 2.01 only)By:
    
    /s/ John CullinaneName: John CullinaneTitle: DirectorAttest: /s/ Jolene NelsonBy: Jolene Nelson
 TABERNA PREFERRED FUNDING V, LTD.(as to Section 2.01 only)By:
    
    /s/ John CullinaneName: John CullinaneTitle: DirectorAttest: /s/ Jolene NelsonBy:
Jolene Nelson
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-46108, 333-57896 and 333-87164) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. of our reportdated January 17, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

March 28, 2003
#### 1368 Realty, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Revelation Blouse Corp., Defendant.

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan,

June 18, 1956.

*Benjamin Miller*for plaintiff.

*Morris C. Kimmel*for defendant.

Nathaniel Sorkin, J.

Plaintiff seeks summary judgment in this action to recover rent for commercial space occupied in its premises by the defendant.

There is no dispute as to the facts. Plaintiff, as landlord of 1370 Broadway, Manhattan, and defendant, as tenant of a loft therein, entered into a written lease on January 30, 1953 for said space for a three-year term at a graduated rental of $8,600 for the first year, and $10,000 for the last year. Attached to the lease, and signed by the plaintiff and defendant simultaneously *24with the execution of said lease, is an agreement pursuant to the statute for fixing a reasonable rent (Commercial Rent Law, § 4, subd. 3; L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.). The agreement contained the required statements and set forth 1 “ the ‘ emergency rent ’ * * is $10,000 per annum.” 2 “ the reasonable rent is fixed at * * * $12,000 per annum.” The lease expired January 31, 1956. Defendant continues to occupy the space as a statutory tenant and as such is required to pay the emergency rent. Plaintiff contends that the emergency rent is $12,000 per annum; defendant offers that it is $10,000 per annum.

The written agreement and lease herein, both relating to the same premises and executed simultaneously by the parties, must be read together as one. *(Nau*v. *Vulcan Rail & Constr. Co.,*286 N. Y. 188.)

Under subdivision 6 of section 4 of the statute, “ The rent fixed by arbitration or by the supreme court or the rent reserved or payable under any such written agreeement shall be the emergency rent for such space until and unless a new rent shall be fixed by arbitration or the supreme court or the tenant or a successor tenant and the landlord shall make a new agreement. ’ ’

The mere stipulation of an amount as the reasonable rent in the agreement between the parties did not either expressly or by implication impose an obligation upon the tenant to pay such an amount after the expiration of the lease. *(Morris Properties*v. *Brand,*2 Misc 2d 373.)

The only rent *“*reserved or payable ” under the entire agreement between the parties is that set forth in the lease. There being no new rent fixed by arbitration, Supreme Court order, or new agreement between the parties, the greatest rent reserved or payable under the lease herein is the emergency rent for the demised space.

Accordingly, the rent due and owing by defendant as a statutory tenant is at the rate of $10,000 per annum. Settle order on notice.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19330-19331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10761]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------<SUP>1


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board <SUP>1
[STB Finance Docket No. 32897]


Pickens Railway Company--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--The 
Pickens Railroad Company

    Pickens Railway Company, a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice 
of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire the railroad line and 
other assets of The Pickens Railroad Company from milepost 0.0 at 
Pickens to milepost 8.5 at Easley, a distance of 8.5 miles in Pickens 
County, SC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 
Stat. 803, which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and took effect 
on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and 
transferred certain functions to the Surface Transportation Board 
(Board). This notice relates to functions that are subject to Board 
jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10901.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consummation is scheduled to occur on or after April 23, 1996.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to reopen will not automatically stay the 
transaction. An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to 
STB Finance Docket No. 32897, must be filed with the Office of the 
Secretary, Surface Transportation Board, Case Control Branch, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of 
each pleading must be served on Fritz R. Kahn, Esq., Fritz R. Kahn, 
P.C., Suite 750 West, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005-
3934.


[[Page 19331]]


    Decided: April 25, 1996.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10761 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          57,295
<SECURITIES>                                    11,998
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (512)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,340
<PP&E>                                           3,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,482)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,359
<SALES>                                         18,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,196
<CGS>                                            6,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,424)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,657
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,767)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.22)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 577 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 577

 To direct Federal departments and agencies to verify eligibility for 
  Federal benefits for individuals 95 years of age or older, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2023

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct Federal departments and agencies to verify eligibility for 
  Federal benefits for individuals 95 years of age or older, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN 
              ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--The head of each Federal department or agency that 
provides Federal benefits to individuals who have attained 95 years of 
age or more shall take appropriate steps to ensure, on a semiannual 
basis, that each such individual remains eligible for such benefits.
    (b) Authority To Issue Regulations.--The head of each Federal 
department or agency specified in paragraph (1) may issue regulations 
to implement this section.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
payments of Federal benefits made on or after December 31, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19269-19270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10707]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-340-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

April 25, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 22, 1996, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. 
CP96-340-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.212) for authorization to establish a new delivery point to 
accommodate deliveries of gas transported on an interruptible basis for 
Ohio Intrastate Gas Transmission Company (Ohio Intrastate), in Carroll 
County, Ohio, under Tennessee's blanket certificate issued in Docket 
No. CP82-413-000, pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    Tennessee proposes to construct and operate 2 8-inch hot taps and 
electronic gas measurement equipment in order to deliver up to 50 MMcf 
of natural gas per day to Ohio Intrastate. Ohio Intrastate will install 
2 6-inch turbine meters and

[[Page 19270]]

approximately 700 feet of interconnecting piping, and Tennessee will 
inspect the facilities that Ohio Intrastate installs. Tennessee 
transports gas for Ohio Intrastate under the terms of its Rate Schedule 
IT. It is asserted that the total volumes to be delivered after the 
addition of the requested delivery point would not exceed those 
presently authorized. It is further asserted that Tennessee has 
sufficient capacity to accomplish the deliveries without detriment or 
disadvantage to its other customers. It is explained that the proposed 
delivery point would not have any significant impact on Tennessee's 
peak day or annual deliveries. It is further explained that Tennessee's 
tariff does not prohibit the addition of delivery points.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be 
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for filing a 
protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after 
the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be 
treated as an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10707 Filed 4-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Four Rivers BioEnergy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Gary Hudson, President and Chief Executive Officer and Martin Thorp, Chief Financial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Four Rivers BioEnergy Inc. and will be retained by Four Rivers BioEnergy Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |                                                                                
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   June 16, 2008 | /s/ Gary Hudson                                                                
|                      | Gary Hudson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



|                      |                                                                   
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   June 16, 2008 | /s/ Martin Thorp                                                  
|                      | Martin Thorp
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5697 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5697

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure veterans may 
    obtain a physical copy of a certain form by mail or at medical 
    facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2023

  Mr. Bilirakis (for himself and Mr. Pappas) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure veterans may 
    obtain a physical copy of a certain form by mail or at medical 
    facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO MAKE 
              AVAILABLE TO VETERANS PHYSICAL COPIES OF COVERED FORM FOR 
              REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRAVEL EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall prescribe 
regulations to ensure that--
            (1) a veteran may, for the purposes of submitting a claim 
        for the reimbursement of expenses for travel under section 111 
        of title 38, United States Code--
                    (A) obtain a physical copy of the covered form--
                            (i) by mail, upon the request of such 
                        veteran; or
                            (ii) at any medical facility of the 
                        Department; and
                    (B) submit the covered form at any such medical 
                facility; and
            (2) any such medical facility to which a veteran submits 
        the covered form--
                    (A) evaluates such covered form; and
                    (B) processes such claim associated with such 
                covered form, if applicable.
    (b) Covered Form Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
form'' means Department of Veterans Affairs Form 10-3452 (or any 
successor document).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5869 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5869

  To amend title 40, United States Code, to require a majority of the 
members of the Commission of Fine Arts to be residents of the District 
                              of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2023

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 40, United States Code, to require a majority of the 
members of the Commission of Fine Arts to be residents of the District 
                              of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commission of Fine Arts District of 
Columbia Residency Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING MAJORITY OF MEMBERS OF COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS TO BE 
              DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RESIDENTS.

    (a) Requirement.--Section 9101(b) of title 40, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``appointed by the President, who serve'' and 
inserting ``a majority of whom are residents of the District of 
Columbia, who shall be appointed by the President to serve''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect upon the expiration of the 1-year period which begins on 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3922

_____________________________ S ARINA M ARIE Y OUNG , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. October 10, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , O STERHAUS , and W I NOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
No. 72-1234.

#### Silverman, Administrator *v.*Browning et al.

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Conn.

Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

t1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147341 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147341

COA: 316117

Cheboygan CC: 12

- 004483

- FC

ALBERT JOSEPH KNAPP, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 28, 2013, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals. On order

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.