alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25242-25243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12580]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc., 
Check Imagineing Project

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 11, 1996 and April 9, 1996, 
pursuant to Sec. 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the 
Financial Service Technology Consortium, Inc.; Check Imaging Project 
has filed written notification simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the changes are as 
follows: RDM Corporation, Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA; and Polytechnic 
University, Brooklyn, NY have been added to the venture.

[[Page 25243]]

    On May 2, 1995, the Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc.; 
Check Imaging Project filed its original notification pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in 
the Federal Register pursuant to Sec. 6(b) of the Act on June 20, 1995 
(60 Fed. Reg. 33169-70).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-12580 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James P. Kelley, II, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Discovery Bancorp;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date:  June 30, 2005
    /s/ James P. Kelley, IIJames P. Kelley, II,President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of W.  S.  INDUSTRIES,  INC.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB,  Amendment No. 1, for the period ending May 31, 2007
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  James  F.  Dempsey,   President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,
respectively,  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  August 13, 2007

                                             By: /s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
                                                 _________________________
                                                 James F. Dempsey
                                                 Chief  Executive  Officer
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 346 

Recognizing that the occurrence of prostate cancer in African-American men 

has reached epidemic proportions and urging Federal agencies to address 

that health crisis by designating additional funds for research, education, 

awareness outreach, and early detection. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Mr. MEEKS of New York (for himself, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. 

BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CAPUANO, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. 

CLARKE, Mr. CLAY, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, 

Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

HOLT, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, Mr. NADLER of New York, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. SERRANO, 

Mr. TOWNS, Mr. WATT, and Mr. WU) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing that the occurrence of prostate cancer in African-American men has reached epidemic proportions and 

urging Federal agencies to address that health crisis 

by designating additional funds for research, education, 

awareness outreach, and early detection. 

Whereas the incidence of prostate cancer in African-American 

men is 60 percent higher than in any other racial or ethnic group in the United States; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 346 IH 

Whereas African-American men have the highest mortality 

rate of any ethnic and racial group in the United States, 

dying at a rate that is 140 percent higher than other ethnic and racial groups; 

Whereas that rate of mortality represents the largest disparity of mortality rates in any of the major cancers; 

Whereas prostate cancer can be cured with early detection 

and the proper treatment, regardless of the ethnic or racial group of the cancer patient; 

Whereas African-Americans are more likely to be diagnosed 

earlier in age and at a later stage of cancer progression 

than all other ethnic and racial groups, thereby leading 

to lower cure rates and lower chances of survival; and 

Whereas, according to a recent paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard 

Medical School have discovered a variant of a small segment of the human genome that accounts for the higher 

risk of prostate cancer in African-American men: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes that prostate cancer has created 

3 a health crisis for African-American men; and 

4 (2) urges Federal agencies to designate addi5 tional funds for— 

6 (A) research to address and attempt to end 

7 such health crisis; and 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 346 IH 

1 (B) efforts relating to education, aware2 ness, and early detection at the grassroots levels 

3 to end such health crisis. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia
ATLA NTA,

_________________ ___ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A15D0162. WILLIE A. HOPKINS, JR. v. SUSIE M. RHODES. WillieA. Hopkins, Jr. filed this discretionary application seeking review of a “Tem porary Order” directing him to pay $10, 000 to his ex- wife and provide her

with “thename of a lice nsed real

estate br oker with whom he is will ing to work

in the sale of the former

marital residen ce.” Although H opkins has inc luded no materials with his a pplication other than this temporary order, it appear s that the order arose fro m apetition to h old Hopkins in contem pt for failing to com

ply with certai

n provisions of the part ies’ divorce decree. Under the Geor gia Constit

ution of 19 83, Art. VI, Se c. VI, Par. I II (6), the Sup reme Court has a ppellate ju risdicti on over “[a]ll div orce and ali mony cases.” “[A]n appeal fr

om the judgm ent

in a contem

pt action se eking to enforc e any portion of [a] di vorce dec ree other

than child custody i s ancillar y to divo rce and

alim ony and falls wit hi n [t he S up reme ] Co urt’s jurisdi ction ov er ‘divorce and alimony cases.’ [Cits .]” Rogers v. McGahee , 278 Ga. 287, 288 (1) (60 2 SE2d 582) (2004); se e also Morris v. Morri

s , 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2) (670 SE2d 84) (2008). Because

this case appears to fall w ithin the Su prem e Court’ s jurisdi ction over divorce a nd alim ony cases, i t is hereby

TRAN SFERRED to the S uprem e Court. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, At

lanta,_____

_______________ I certify t hat the abo ve is a true extract from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature and th e se al of sai d court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 12/17/2014 December 17, 2014
#### Joseph B. Cooper, Plaintiff, *v.*Realty Appraisers, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 17, 1956.

*Harry T. Lindauer*for defendant.

*Louis Wilk*for plaintiff.

Benedict D. Dineen, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff performed certain services in connection with negotiations for the purchase and sale of real property in the city of Richmond, Virginia. It further alleges that the plaintiff is a duly licensed real estate broker of the State of Virginia but does not allege that he is duly licensed as such in the State of New York pursuant to section 442-d of the Real Property Law. *647If the plaintiff claims to be excluded from the provisions of section 442-d or that the same are not applicable in the present action those facts must be alleged. The complaint is silent as to where the contract was entered into and where the services were performed. Such facts might obviate the provisions of the statute. Motion granted but with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 10 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereof. Order signed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Adsero Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Smith,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ William Smith
------------------------------
Name:  William Smith
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 10, 2006
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Luc Vanhal, the Chief Financial Officer of Caleco Pharma
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/ Luc Vanhal         
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | LUC VANHAL             
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | June 14, 2011          
| |        |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12002]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Microelectronics and Computer Technology 
Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 18, 1995, pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Microelectronics 
and Computer Technology Corporation (``MCC'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the changes are as 
follows: Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, TX, has agreed to participate 
in MCC's Infoslueth Project; and G.K. Intelligent Systems, Houston, TX; 
Hughes Training, Inc., Arlington, TX; and Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg, 
IL, have agreed to participate in MCC's HyMPACT Project. American 
Express Company, Bellcore, E.M. Warburg, Pincus Ventures, Inc., 
Interval Research Corporation, Sandia National Laboratories, Unysis 
Corporation, Intelligent Machine Technology, ITAC Systems, Inc., 
Electronics Manufacturing Productivity Facility (``EMPF''); Institute 
for Micromanufacturing; Louisiana Tech University; and University of 
Dayton Research Institute have withdrawn from the venture.
    On December 21, 1984, MCC filed its original notification pursuant 
to Sec. 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Sec. 6(b) of the Act on January 17, 
1985 (50 FR 2633). The last notification was filed on May 24, 1995. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register on 
June 28, 1995 (60 FR 33433).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-12002 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7436

MAKISA DENISE MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TONYA HAIRSTON, Deputy; CAPTAIN SPENCE; DEPUTY

MCFARLIN; DEPUTY SMITH, a/k/a Skipper,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (7:07-cv-00413-JLK)

Submitted: January 11, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Makisa Denise Martin, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Makisa Denise Martin appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Martin

v. Hairston, No. 7:07-cv-00413-JLK (W.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5963 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5963

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to provide that 
grand and petit jurors serving in the Superior Court of the District of 
  Columbia shall receive fees and expenses at the same rates paid to 
 grand and petit jurors appearing in the district courts of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2023

                Ms. Norton introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

       Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to provide that 
grand and petit jurors serving in the Superior Court of the District of 
  Columbia shall receive fees and expenses at the same rates paid to 
 grand and petit jurors appearing in the district courts of the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Juror Pay 
Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHING FEES FOR JURORS SERVING IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE 
              DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AT SAME RATES PAID FOR JURORS 
              SERVING IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS.

    (a) Establishment of Fees.--Section 11-1912(a), District of 
Columbia Official Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Grand and petit jurors serving in the Superior Court shall 
receive fees and expenses at rates equivalent to the rates provided 
under section 1871 of title 28, United States Code, for fees and 
allowances paid to grand and petit jurors appearing in the district 
courts of the United States.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 15-718, District of Columbia 
Official Code, is repealed.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to fees and expenses paid on or after the first day of the 
first fiscal year which begins after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued May 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00237-CR

———————————

ALIESHA MOOREHEAD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 7

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2054853

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Aliesha Moorehead has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in 

the appeal. 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Petition for Writ of Mandamus D ismiss ed and Memorandum Opinion filed October

30 , 2012.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00886

- CV

IN RE PATRICIA ANN P OTTS , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 24678

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 25, 2012, relator Patricia Ann Potts filed a pro se petition for writ
of m andamus in this C ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. On October 5, 2012, notice was filed that pursuant to section 11.103
of the Texas Civil Practic e and Remedies Code, Patricia Ann Potts has been declared a vexatious litigant and is therefore subject to the pre

- filing order under section 11.101. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.101, 11.103 (West Supp. 2012)

.2

As of this date, relator has not shown that she obtained an order from the local administrative judge under section 11.102 permitting the filing of this original proceeding. See Tex . Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.103 (b) (West Supp. 2012). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.