alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML AppletonFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006                      |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |                 |   |
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |                      |  |  |

 

20

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of pSivida Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Ashton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 11, 2011



|                |  |                                      
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Ashton
|Name:           |  | Paul Ashton                          
|Title:          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6040

GARY CURTIS BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANK SIZER, JR., Warden, Western Correctional

Institution; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney

General for the State of Maryland,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-2443-PJM)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrell Non Roberts, III, ROBERTS & WOOD, Riverdale, Maryland, for

Appellant. David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann

Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Curtis Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Sizer, No. CA-98-2443-

PJM (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 19, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00067

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF S.O.W.

From the 386th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1994

- JUV

- 02115 W1 Honorable Laura Parker , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion issued this date, this appeal is DISMISS E D FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on July 19, 2017

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of July, 2017

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (theCompany) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicatedbelow, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to hisknowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: January 16, 2007BRUNO FRUSCALZOBruno FruscalzoPrincipal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer













---
H. Res. 305 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 1, 2009. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 85) setting forth the 

congressional budget for the United States Government for 

fiscal year 2010 and including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2009 and 2011 through 2014. The first 

reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the concurrent 

resolution are waived. General debate shall not exceed four 

hours, with three hours confined to the congressional budget 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget and one hour 

on the subject of economic goals and policies equally divided 

and controlled by Representative Maloney of New York and 

Representative Brady of Texas or their designees. After general debate the Committee of the Whole shall rise without 
2 

•HRES 305 EH 

motion. No further consideration of the concurrent resolution 

shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the 

House. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stonechurch,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended  November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


Date:  January 16, 2006


/s/ Bryan McKay
---------------------------------
Bryan McKay, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-30215

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CRAIG JONES, also known as Paco,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:07-CR-352-11

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Craig Jones has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our independent review of the record,

counsel’s brief, and Jones’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 30, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-30215 Document: 00511336720 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/30/2010
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12406]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Number 40-6622]


Pathfinder Mines Corp.; Amendment of Source Material License

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Amendment of Source Material License SUA-442 to include 
reclamation milestone dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission has amended Pathfinder Mines Corporation's (PMC's) Source 
Material License SUA-442 to include reclamation milestone dates. This 
amendment was requested by PMC by its letter dated March 26, 1996, and 
the receipt of the request by NRC was noticed in the Federal Register 
on April 5, 1996.
    The license amendment adds License Condition 50 to include 
completion dates for various site-reclamation milestones. The schedule 
proposed by PMC and accepted by the NRC staff is as follows:
    (1) Windblown tailings retrieval and placement on the tailings 
pile, December 31, 1997.
    (2) Placement of an interim cover over tailings, December 31, 1997.
    (3) Placement of final radon barrier, December 31, 1999.
    (4) Placement of erosion protection, December 31, 2000.
    (5) Completion of groundwater corrective actions, December 31, 
2005.
    An environmental assessment is not required since this action is 
categorically excluded under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(11), and an environmental 
report from the licensee is not required by 10 CFR 51.60(b)(2).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PMC's amended license, and the NRC staff's 
technical evaluation of the amendment request are being made available 
for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 
L Street NW (Lower Level), Washington, DC 20555.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mohammad W. Haque, Uranium Recovery 
Branch, Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Telephone (301) 415-6640.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of May 1996.
Daniel M. Gillen,
Acting Chief, Uranium Recovery Branch, Division of Waste Management, 
Office of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 96-12406 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6244

DENNIS E. YARRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

A. JORDAN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-863-5-BO)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis E. Yarrell, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis E. Yarrell, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Yarrell v. Jordan, No. CA-99-

863-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

MCKESSON CORP. et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civ. Action No. 82-220 (RJL) 

FINAL JUDGMENT 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

~ 

~ day of November, 2010, hereby 

ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the 

defendants in the amount of $43,980,205.58; and it is further 

ORDERED that the parties are directed to submit within fourteen (14) days of the 

date of this Order, a Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule for determination of the issue of 

any additional attorneys' fees, costs, and post-judgment interest. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








Pursuant
      to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Aspreva
      Pharmaceuticals Corporation, (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best
      of his knowledge, that:





a.
            The
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
                2005 to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
“Form
                10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andb.
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
                August 9, 2005
            /s/
                Bruce G. CousinsBruce
                G. CousinsChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)








A
      signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. This certification
“accompanies” the Form 10−Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
      SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10−Q),
      irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
      filing.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 18

- 20741 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus **Victor Delacruz Salas,** also known as **Jose Soto**

**- Jimenez,**  Defendan t

— Appellant

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 325

- l

Before **Davis, Stewart,** and **Dennis,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  : *
Defendant

- Appellant Victor Delacruz Salas appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that there is an impermissible conflict between the oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment ,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 10, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20741 Document: 00515559306 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2020No. 18

- 20741

2 which included a surrender condition as a special condition of supervised releas e
. Salas did not have a meaningful opportunity to object in the district
court

. See U nited States v. Diggles , 957 F.3d 551, 559

- 63 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc). Consequently, review is for an abuse of discretion

. See U nited States v. Rivas

- Estrada , 906 F.3d 346, 348

- 50 (5th Cir. 2018).
The record in this case reflects that the district cou rt intended for Salas to be deported following his prison term. See United States v. Vasquez

Puente , 922 F.3d 700 , 703

- 05 (5th Cir. 2019)

. T he s urrender condition was consistent with this intent and did not “broaden[] the restrictions or requirements of supervised release from the oral pronouncement

. ” Id . at 705 (internal quotation marks , brackets, and citation omitted). Consequently, the district court did not abuse its discretion by including the surrender condition in the written judg ment

. See i d. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-20741 Document: 00515559306 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2020
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.5  


 
 

Amended Compensation Arrangement for Non-Executive Vice Chair
  (As of July 27, 2006)    



        The
Non-Executive Vice Chair of Viacom's Board of Directors will receive annual cash compensation of $200,000, payable in equal installments quarterly in advance, and a per
meeting attendance fee of $4,000. Grants awarded under the Company's 2006 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors and the Company's 2006 RSU Plan for Outside Directors are not affected by the
amendment. 











QuickLinks


Amended Compensation Arrangement for Non-Executive Vice Chair (As of July 27, 2006)
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David B. Christofferson, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this report onForm 10-Q of Venoco, Inc. (“Registrant”);

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.      The Registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Registrant and have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)     disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.      The Registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)     all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| /s/ David B. Christofferson |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| David B. Christofferson     |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*   |   |
| May 16, 2006           |   |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
  /s/ James G. AzleinJames G. Azlein,President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ George J. ZilichGeorge J. Zilich,Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DON WILSONDon Wilson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  July 11, 2007





























---