alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Frank, Alst on and Senior Judge Coleman

VOLVO TRUCKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. AND LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0043-10-3 PER CURIAM MAY 18, 2010 CHANNON MELISSA MAYCOCK

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Christopher M. Kite; Lucas & K ite, PLC, on brief), for appellants. (Bryan G. Bosta; Gentry Lock e Rakes & Moore, on brief), for appellee.

Volvo Trucks of North America, Inc. a nd Liberty Insurance Corporation (employer) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compen sation Commission finding that Channon Melissa Maycock (claimant) provided sufficient medi cal evidence to prove she suffered from an occupational disease and was entitled to compen sation. Employer also contends that if the medical evidence proved claimant suffered from a ny type of occupational disease, the evidence established, at best, the occupational exacerbation of a preexisting ordinary disease of life. We

have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Maycock v. Volvo Trucks of North America, Inc. , VWC File No. 239-91-20 (Dec. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affi rm because the facts and legal contentions are

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - adequately presented in the materials before th e Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional

process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.3




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
 1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LLC.
 
 
 Date: November 12, 2010


/s/Anthony J. Branca__


Anthony J. Branca


Chief Financial Officer


ICON Capital Corp.


Manager of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
Certain Compensation Arrangements with Directors for 2006



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 RADIAN GROUP INC. 
 CERTAIN COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
 WITH DIRECTORS FOR 2006 
 (Effective
September 1, 2006) 
 Cash Compensation 
 All of Radian’s non-employee directors receive an annual fee for their services of $32,500. Each non-employee director also receives a $2,000 fee for each board meeting or committee meeting attended. 
 In addition to the foregoing, Herbert Wender, our non-executive Chairman of the Board, receives an annual fee of $150,000 for serving as Chairman, and
the chairmen of the following committees are paid the following annual fees: 
 Audit and Risk Committee—$12,500

 Compensation and Human Resources Committee—$7,500 
 Credit Committee—$5,000 
 Governance Committee—$5,000 
 Investment and Finance Committee—$5,000 

All annual fees are paid quarterly in advance, and all meeting fees are payable quarterly in arrears. 
 Radian maintains a deferred compensation plan for its non-employee directors. The deferred compensation plan allows non-employee directors to defer (or
if amounts were previously deferred, to re-defer subject to certain limitations) receipt of all or a portion of their cash compensation. Deferring compensation allows directors to defer income tax liability on that compensation and to earn on the
deferred amounts a rate of return calculated under one of three different options available to participating directors. 
 Equity Compensation

 Each of Radian’s non-employee directors receives an annual grant of phantom stock, awarded under Radian’s Equity Compensation
Plan, equal to $115,000 based on the closing price of Radian’s common stock on the date of the annual grant. Awards of phantom stock to directors generally vest upon the termination of the director’s relationship with Radian. 

Radian requires each director to maintain a minimum direct investment in Radian common stock equal to at least $350,000, on or before the later of
January 1, 2007 or four years from the date that a director’s service on the board begins. 
 Directors who are our employees do
not receive additional compensation for their service as directors.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5754 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 350 

W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Felicitas 

and Gonzalo Mendez United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5754 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 350 W. 1st 

3 Street, Los Angeles, California, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Felicitas and Gonzalo Mendez United 

5 States Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Felicitas and Gonzalo Mendez 

11 United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5754 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

Courthouse’’. the ‘‘Felicitas and Gonzalo Mendez United States at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California, as
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy EWING, Appellant.

No. WD 47908.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 26, 1994.

*363Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

*PER CURIAM:*

Defendant appeals conviction of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Cum.Supp.1993.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 58 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require an annual report 

on the Office for State and Local Law Enforcement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require 

an annual report on the Office for State and Local 

Law Enforcement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Information 

5 Resource to Strengthen Ties with State and Local Law 

6 Enforcement Act of 2023’’ or the ‘‘FIRST State and 

7 Local Law Enforcement Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 58 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORT ON OFFICE FOR STATE AND 

2 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT. 

3 Section 2006(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 

4 2002 (6 U.S.C. 607(b)) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as para6 graph (6); and 

7 (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol8 lowing new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(5) ANNUAL REPORT.—For each of fiscal 

10 years 2023 through 2027, the Assistant Secretary 

11 for State and Local Law Enforcement shall submit 

12 to the Committee on Homeland Security and the 

13 Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Rep14 resentatives and the Committee on Homeland Secu15 rity and Governmental Affairs and the Committee 

16 on the Judiciary of the Senate a report on the activi17 ties of the Office for State and Local Law Enforce18 ment. Each such report shall include, for the fiscal 

19 year covered by such report, a description of each of 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘(A) Efforts to coordinate and share infor22 mation regarding Department and component 

23 agency programs with State, local, and Tribal 

24 law enforcement agencies. 

25 ‘‘(B) Efforts to improve information shar26 ing through the Homeland Security Information 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 58 IH

1 Network by appropriate component agencies of 

2 the Department and by State, local, and Tribal 

3 law enforcement agencies. 

4 ‘‘(C) The status of performance metrics 

5 within the Office of State and Local Law En6 forcement to evaluate the effectiveness of ef7 forts to carry out the activities specified in sub8 section (a). 

9 ‘‘(D) Any feedback from State, local, and 

10 Tribal law enforcement agencies regarding the 

11 Office of State and Local Law Enforcement, in12 cluding the mechanisms utilized to collect such 

13 feedback. 

14 ‘‘(E) Efforts to carry out all other respon15 sibilities of the Office of State and Local Law 

16 Enforcement.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1193]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive Patent License; Shields 
Environmental Corp.

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Shields Environmental Corporation, a revocable, 
nonassignable, exclusive license in the United States practice the 
Government owned invention described in U.S. Patent Application Serial 
No. 08/342,451 ``Mobile Safety Structure for Containment and handling 
Hazardous Materials,'' filed November 14, 1994.
    Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has 60 days 
from the date of this notice to file written objections along with 
supporting evidence, if any. Written objections are to be filed with 
the Office of Naval Research, ONR OOCC, Ballston Tower One, Arlington, 
Virginia 22217-5660.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. R.J. Erickson, Staff Patent 
Attorney, Office of Naval Research, ONR OOCC, Ballston Tower One, 800 
North Quincy Street, Arlington, Virginia 22217-5660, telephone (703) 
696-4001.

    Dated: January 17, 1996.
Michael A. Waters,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-1193 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5890 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5890

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to limit the authority of the 
   Secretary of Veterans Affairs to deny the claim of a veteran for 
  benefits under the laws administered by such Secretary on the sole 
  basis that such veteran failed to appear for a medical examination 
                      associated with such claim.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 3, 2023

               Mr. Luttrell introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

             Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to limit the authority of the 
   Secretary of Veterans Affairs to deny the claim of a veteran for 
  benefits under the laws administered by such Secretary on the sole 
  basis that such veteran failed to appear for a medical examination 
                      associated with such claim.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Review Every Veterans Claim Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DENIAL OF CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS UNDER LAWS 
              ADMINISTERED BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ON SOLE 
              BASIS THAT VETERAN FAILED TO APPEAR FOR CERTAIN MEDICAL 
              EXAMINATION.

    Subsection (d) of section 5103A of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Compensation Claims'' and 
        inserting ``Claims for Benefits'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``treat an examination or 
        opinion as being necessary to make a decision on a claim for 
        purposes of'' and inserting ``provide for a medical examination 
        or obtain a medical opinion under''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) If a veteran fails to appear for a medical examination 
provided by the Secretary in conjunction with a claim for a benefit 
under a law administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may not deny 
such claim on the sole basis that such veteran failed to appear for 
such medical examination.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Darrell BURNS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

No. 56309.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 23, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 1990.

Beverly A. Beimdiek, St. Louis, for mov-ant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Andrea K. Spillars, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5700 

To direct the Secretary of State to develop and submit to Congress a strategy 

to improve the processing of passport applications. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 

Ms. CARAVEO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of State to develop and submit to 

Congress a strategy to improve the processing of passport applications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Assistance for 

5 Streamlining Travel Passports Act’’ or the ‘‘FAST Pass6 ports Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5700 IH

1 SEC. 2. STRATEGY TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION RELAT2 ING TO THE PROCESSING OF PASSPORT AP3 PLICATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State 

6 shall develop and submit to the relevant congressional 

7 committees a strategy to improve the processing of pass8 port applications. 

9 (b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The strategy re10 quired by subsection (a) shall, within 360 days after the 

11 date of submission of the strategy, seek to achieve the fol12 lowing: 

13 (1) Improve communication within the Depart14 ment of State, including among all passport agencies 

15 and centers, relating to the processing of passport 

16 applications. 

17 (2) Ensure that United states citizens and con18 gressional offices inquiring on behalf of such citizens 

19 are able to contact the Department of State, includ20 ing a passport agency or center, regarding the status 

21 of requests for passport applications and receive up22 dates within a reasonably short period of time. 

23 (c) RELEVANT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE24 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘relevant congressional 

25 committees’’ means the Committee on Foreign Affairs of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5700 IH

1 the House of Representatives and the Committee on For2 eign Relations of the Senate. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3 Nos. 333-82934, 333-89840, 333-105288 and 333-110197) of IntraBiotics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related prospectuses, and in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-40524, 333-65616, 333-101632 and 333-108096)
pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2002 Non-Officer
Equity Incentive Plan and option agreements with Kathleen D. LaPorte and Ernest
Mario Ph.D., of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February
6, 2004, with respect to the financial statements of IntraBiotics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2003.

                             /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 18, 2004
ex10-3.htm






EXHIBIT 10.3







AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is by and between Unico American Corporation (“Company”) and Terry L. Kinigstein (“Emp1oyee”):







A. Paragraph 3.1 of the Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee which was effective as of April 1, 2009 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:







3.1. SALARY.  As compensation for the services provided by Employee under this Agreement, Company will pay Employee an annual salary of no less than $198,300 payable in accordance with Company’s usual payroll procedures.  The annual salary shall be subject to increase from time to time at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Company.







Paragraph 6 of the Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee which was effective as of April 1, 2009 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:







6.     TERM/TERMINATION. Employee’s employment under this Agreement shall be for a term beginning on January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2012. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be terminated at any time by Company for Cause or by Employee for other than breach of this Agreement by the Company upon thirty days written notice.  This Agreement may also be terminated by Company without Cause upon thirty days written notice or by the Employee at any time on account of the breach of this Agreement by Company; however, in either of such events, subject to the limitation described in Section 3.6, the Company shall pay Employee, as and in the manner provided in Section 3.4, all salary, bonuses and benefits as provided herein for the remainder of the term of this Agreement.







B. This Amendment is effective January 1, 2010.







C. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged.












COMPANY:


Unico American Corporation


 


By: _/s/ Cary L. Cheldin                                                         Date:  March 26, 2010


Cary L. Cheldin, President & Chief Executive Officer












EMPLOYEE:







/s/ Terry L. Kinigstein                                                             Date: March 26, 2010


Terry L. Kinigstein
Order entered November 21, 2017 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01293-CV 

IN RE TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION AND 

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A, INC., Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-15296 

ORDER 

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus and LIFT the Court’s November 9, 2017 stay of both the November 2, 2017 

discovery order and the deposition of relators’ corporate witnesses. We ORDER relators to bear 

the costs, if any, of this original proceeding. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

 JUSTICE
Case 4:17-cr-01658-JGZ-DTF Document 5 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STAR HOUSTON, INC. d/b/a Star Motor Cars, Petitioner, v. Steve SHEVACK, Respondent.

No. 94-1129.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 27, 1995.

Josh M. Harrison, The Woodlands, for petitioner.

William J. Robertson, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s application for writ of error is denied. The Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals’ discussion of mental anguish damages. 886 S.W.2d 414, 418-21.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 2, 2018

No. 04-18-00735-CV

Jose S. FAJARDO,

Appellant

v.

RAFCO LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV05195

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 26, 2018, appellant José S. Fajardo filed a notice of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.1(a). The same day, a deputy clerk of this court notified Appellant in writing that our 

records do not show that the $205.00 filing fee has been paid. Further, our records do not 

conclusively establish that Appellant is excused by statute or rule from paying the filing fee. See

id. R. 5 (requiring fees in civil cases); id. R. 20.1 (waiving appellate court costs under certain 

circumstances). The deputy clerk’s October 11, 2018 letter warned Appellant that if the filing 

fee was not paid by October 22, 2018, the appeal could be stricken by this court. To date, this 

court has not received payment or a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs. 

See id.; see also TEX. R. CIV. P. 145.

The deputy clerk’s letter also advised Appellant that the docketing statement must be 

filed with this court by October 22, 2018. See id. R. 32.1; 4TH TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R.

5.2, http://www.txcourts.gov/4thcoa/practice-before-the-court/local-rules.aspx. To date, no 

docketing statement has been filed. 

We ORDER Appellant to file a docketing statement within TEN DAYS of the date of 

this order. 

We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this 

order that either (1) the $205.00 filing fee has been paid, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal 

without paying the filing fee. 
If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed without further 

notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c); In re W.J.C., No. 04-05-00532-CV, 2005 WL 3477883 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). 

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith Duane MACK, Appellant. Keith Duane MACK, Appellant. v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 49072, WD 51075.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 19, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 30, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied June 25, 1996.

Jeannie Arterburn, Asst. Appellate Defender, K.C., for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

*PER CURIAM.*

Appeal from jury conviction of second degree felony murder, § 565.021.1(2), RSMo 1986, as well as denial of Rule 29.15 motion.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).