alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CANAM URANIUM
      CORP.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Canam
      Uranium Corp. for the quarter ended January 31, 2007, the undersigned, David
      Hayes, Chief Financial Officer of Canam Uranium Corp., does hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended January 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Canam Uranium Corp.




Date:
              March 27, 2007
            
            /s/
              David HayesDavid
                HayesChief
              Financial Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00201

- CR

JOANNA MARTINEZ GONZ ALEZ

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2012

- DCR

- 2626

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 14, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 15, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 31668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12323]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CG Docket Nos. 03-123 and 10-51; FCC 21-61; FRS 31248]


Video Relay Service Compensation; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the inadvertent omission of the DATES 
section in the preamble to a proposed rule document published in the 
Federal Register on June 4, 2021. This correction provides the due 
dates for comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking summarized in the Federal Register document.

DATES: Comments are due July 15, 2021. Reply comments are due July 30, 
2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by CG Docket Nos. 03-123 
and 10-51, by either of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal Communications Commission's website: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings. Follow the instructions for submitting 
comments.
    <bullet> Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must 
file an original and one copy of each filing. Filings can be sent by 
hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by 
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. Currently, the 
Commission does not accept any hand delivered or messenger delivered 
filings as a temporary measure taken to help protect the health and 
safety of individuals, and to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19. 
All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of 
the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
    For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional 
information on the rulemaking process, see document FCC 21-61 at 
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-21-61A1.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Scott, Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau, (202) 418-1264, or email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eaa78389828b8f86c4b989859e9eaa8c8989c48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6bb9f959e97939ad8a595998282b6909595d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the proposed rules document published at 86 FR 29969, June 4, 
2021, make the following correction. On page 29969 in the third column, 
add after the SUMMARY the following: ``DATES: Comments are due July 15, 
2021. Reply comments are due July 30, 2021.''

    Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-12323 Filed 6-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Peetz, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tobira Therapeutics, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 9, 2016



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher Peetz                                
|Christopher Peetz                                    
|                                                     
|                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
|
#### William J. BLASDEL d/b/a Casey’s Cars, Appellant, v. James W. CATALINA and Sheryl D. Catalina d/b/a Catalina Leasing, Appellees.

No. [ AXX-XX-XXXXX ]-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

Oct. 13, 1994.

Rehearing Overruled Dec. 1, 1994.

Marcus E. Faubion, Houston, for appellant.

Mitchell J. Buchman, Houston, for appel-lees.

*506Before J. CURTISS BROWN, C.J., and MURPHY and ELLIS, JJ.

OPINION ON REMAND

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

Appellant, William Blasdel, sued appellees, James and Sheryl Catalina, for charging a usurious interest rate on a floor plan agreement used to finance inventory on the appellant’s used car lot. The trial court found that the floor plan did not contain an absolute obligation to repay the principal and that the floor plan agreement was not usurious. We reversed the judgment of the trial court finding that appellees charged and received a usurious rate of interest. The Supreme Court of Texas reversed our holding finding that there was “ample evidence supporting the trial court’s conclusion that the transaction was not usurious.” 881 S.W.2d 295. The court remanded the case to us for consideration of two points of error not previously addressed.

In his first two points of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding that the floor plan agreement does not contain an absolute obligation to repay the principal. However, because the supreme court has found that there was “ample” evidence for the trial court to find that the transaction was not usurious, the determination of whether the floor plan agreement contained an absolute obligation to repay is moot. Therefore, appellant’s first and second points of error are overruled.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22071-22072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11854]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Notice and Agenda for Meeting of the Royalty Policy Committee of 
the Minerals Management Advisory Board

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of the Interior (Department) 
has established a Royalty Policy Committee (Committee), on the Minerals 
Management Advisory Board, to provide advice on the Department's 
management of Federal and Indian minerals leases, revenues, and other 
minerals related policies.
    Committee membership includes representatives from States, Indian 
Tribes and allottee organizations, minerals industry associations, the 
general public, and Federal departments. At this second meeting, the 
Committee will hear reports from the subcommittees on audit; appeals,

[[Page 22072]]

settlements, and alternative dispute resolution; royalty reporting and 
production accounting. The Committee will also discuss the work being 
done by the five other subcommittees.

DATES: The meeting will be held on: Tuesday, June 4, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m. and Wednesday, June 5, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Denver Marriott Southeast, 
6363 East Hampden Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222, Telephone (303) 758-
7000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Clare Onstad, Senior Technical 
Advisor to the Associate Director for Royalty Management, Minerals 
Management Service, Royalty Management Program, P.O. Box 25165, MS-
3000, Denver, Colorado 80225-0165, courier delivery to Building 85, 
Room A-212, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado, 80225, telephone 
number (303) 231-3827, fax number (303) 231-3780.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The location and dates of future meetings 
will be published in the Federal Register.
    The meeting will be open to the public without advanced 
registration. Public attendance may be limited to the space available. 
Members of the public may make statements during the meeting, to the 
extent time permits, and file written statements with the Committee for 
its consideration.
    Written statements should be submitted to the address listed above. 
Minutes of Committee meetings will be available for public inspection 
and copying 10 days following each meeting at the Royalty Management 
Program, Building 85, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Avenue and 
Kipling Street, Denver, Colorado.

    Date May 7, 1996
Robert E. Brown,
Associate Director for Royalty Management
[FR Doc. 96-11854 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles G. TEUBNER, Appellant. Charles G. TEUBNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 47382, WD 50815.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 7, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Charles Gregory Teubner appeals his criminal convictions, following a jury trial, of murder in the first degree, § 565.020 RSMo 1994 and armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1994, and the subsequent denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The appeals were consolidated pursuant to Rule 29.15(l). No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT NUMBER 4.51






               AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                    OXBOW INTERNATIONAL MARKETING CORP. AND
                            IMA RESOURCE CORPORATION
                              DATED JULY 15, 2002
























                                                                             139

<PAGE>



IMA EXPLORATION INC.




July 15, 2002




Oxbow International Marketing Corp.
3860 Moscrop Street
Burnaby, BC V5C 2C9



Dear Mr. Grosso:

Re: Consulting Services Agreement

As the amended contract expired on July 1, 2002 the Company would like to extend
the  term  for  another  year at  which  time it will be  reviewed  for  another
extension or renegotiation.

If you are in agreement,  please sign below in the  appropriate  space below and
return one copy to our office.

Yours truly,

/s/ William Lee

William Lee
Chief Financial Officer



I have  read the  above  letter  and agree to the  extension  of the  Consulting
Agreement until July 1, 2003.



/s/ Joesph Grosso            (Pres)                         7/10/02
-----------------------------------                   --------------------------
Oxbow International Marketing Corp.                   Date



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Terminal City Club Tower, Suite709-837 West Hastings Street,
                         Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3N6
       Tel: (604) 687-1828 Fax: (604) 687-1858 Toll Free: (800) 901-0058
       www.imaexploration.com E-Mail: info@imaexploration.com CDNX-"IMR"


                                                                             140
**Exhibit 32.1**     DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David A. Collins Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/David A. Collins, Chairman, CEO and Principal Executive OfficerDate: April 2, 2007
30
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2839-2840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1126]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine 
Fisheries Service (NMFS) will hold a joint meeting to discuss 
coordination of activities that support Atlantic States Marine 
Fisheries Commission coastal fisheries management plans under the 
Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act and the Atlantic 
Striped Bass Conservation Act.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 14, 1996, at 10:00 a.m. to 
3:00 p.m. and is open to the public.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at NMFS Headquarters, Silver Spring 
Metro Center, Building III, Room 3404, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Lubinski, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, 
Room 840, Arlington, VA 22203, (703) 358-1718.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is being held pursuant to 
Public Law 103-206 and Public Law 102-103. Minutes of the meetings will 
be maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Room 840, 4401 
North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and the National Marine 
Fisheries Service, F/CM, Metro Center, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910, and will be available for public inspection during 
regular business 

[[Page 2840]]
hours, Monday through Friday within 30 days following the meeting.

    Dated: January 19, 1996.
Gary Edwards,
Assistant Director--Fisheries; Co-Chair, Atlantic Coastal Fisheries 
Cooperative Management Act Coordination Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-1126 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
### NUMBER 13 - 19 - 00606 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

VALENTIN GAONA , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.
On appeal from the 214 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

.


## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Nora Longoria Appellant, Valentin Gaona , attempts to appeal his conviction for capital murder

. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. This Court ’ s appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent2 a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have juris diction to address the merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Sentence in this matter was imposed on April 25, 2008

. The n otice of appeal at issue was filed on November 25, 2019 . On December 3, 2019 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court ’ s directive. The appellant has not corrected the defect. Additionally, appellant had previously appealed this same conviction in this court in cause number 13

- 08

- 00 364

- CR. Texas Rule of Appe llate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a)(1). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e. See id. 26.3. Appellant ’ s notice of appeal, filed more than ten years af ter sentence was imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See Slaton , 981 S.W.2d at 210. Additionally, on December 16, 2019, Appellant filed a request for court appointed counsel which this court construes as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel and a Motion for Production of Statement of Facts. These motions are both DISMISSED for lack of jur isdiction.3 This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction

. Accordingly , Appellant’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Motion for Production of Statement of Facts and all other motions are hereby expressly DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction

. N ORA L. LONGORIA Justice Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 9th day of January , 2020

.
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Huron Consulting Group Inc. 2002
      Equity Incentive Plan (California)


    EXHIBIT
      10.41

    

      Amendment
        No. 1 to the 

      Amended
        and Restated

      Huron
        Consulting Group Inc.

      2002
        Equity Incentive Plan (California)

      


      


      This
        Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated
        Huron Consulting Group Inc. 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (California) (the
“Plan”)
        is effective as of November 1, 2006.


      WITNESSETH:

       

      WHEREAS,
        pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Plan, the
        board of directors of Huron Consulting Group Inc. (the “board”) may amend the
        Plan; and

       

      WHEREAS,
        the board has determined to amend the
        Plan;

       

      NOW,
        THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as
        follows:

       

      1. The
        last
        paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its
        entirety as follows:

       

      
        “In
          the
          event of a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock
          split,
          stock dividend, extraordinary dividend, or other similar change in the
          structure
          or capitalization of Company, the Administrator shall
          make
          an
          appropriate adjustment to the (a) number and kind of Shares or other securities,
          cash or property that may be delivered under the Plan, (b) number and kind
          of
          Shares or other securities, cash or property subject to outstanding Awards,
          (c)
          exercise price of outstanding Equity Options and Equity Appreciation Rights
          and
          (d) other characteristics or terms of the Awards as the Administrator
          may,
          in its
          sole discretion,
          determine appropriate to equitably reflect such transaction, change or
          distribution.”
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**(Section 906of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Global Geophysical Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, P. Mathew Verghese,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated May 19, 2010 |   | /s/ P. Mathew Verghese                             |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | P. Mathew Verghese                                 |
|                    |   | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Choon Young LIM-KU and K. Lim, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Char H. CHOE and Myung S. Choe, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 67810.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 19, 1996.

Alan G. Gerson, Howard H. Kaplan, St. Louis, for appellants.

Thomas L. Fiala, Paul Simon, Jr., Clayton, for respondents.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Char H. Choe (“Choe”) and Myung S. Choe appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Choon Young Lim-Ku and K. Lim, Ltd., holding Choe liable for breach of contract. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).