alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 2, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00735

- CV

Jose S. FAJARDO
, Appellant

v.

RAFCO LLC
, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV05195 Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On September 26, 2018
, a ppellant Jos é S. Fajardo filed a notice of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1(a). The same day , a deputy clerk of this court notified A ppellant in writing that our records do not show that the $ 20 5.00 filing fee ha s been paid. Further, our records do not conclusively establish that A ppellant is excused by statute or rule from paying the filing fee. See id. R. 5 (requiring fees in civil cases); id. R. 20 .1 (waiving appellate court costs under cert ain circumstances ). The deputy clerk’s October 11 , 201 8 letter warned A ppellant that if the filing fee was not paid by October 22 , 201 8
, the appeal could be stricken by th is court . To date, this court has not received payment or a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs

. See id. ; see also T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145.
The deputy clerk’s letter also advised A ppellant that the docketing statement must be filed with this court by October 22, 2018

. See id. R. 32.1; 4 TH T EX

. A P P

. (S AN A NTONIO ) L OC

. R. 5.2
, http://www.txcourts.gov/4thcoa/practice

- before

- the

- court/local

- rules.aspx

. To date, no docketing statement has been filed.
We ORDER Appellant to file a docketing statement within TEN DAYS of the date of this order.
We ORDER A ppellant to show cause in writing within T E N DAYS of the date of th is order that either (1) the $ 20 5 .00 f iling fee ha s been paid, or (2) A ppellant i s entitled to appeal without pa ying the filing fee.If A ppellant fail s to respond as ordered , th is appeal will be dismissed without further

notice

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5, 42.3(c); In re W.J.C. , No. 04

- 05

- 00532

- CV, 2005 WL 3477883 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court o n this 2nd day of November, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of Court
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-80,718-02

EX P ARTE RONNIE ANTHONY BRYANT, Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1338550 IN THE 338th DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim
. Ap p . 1 9 6 7). Applicant was convicted of ag gravated assault of a family member an d s en t ence d to twelve year s’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appea ls a ffirme d his conviction. Bryant v. State , No. 01-12-00921- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1 st Dist.] , delivere d Dec ember 10, 2013, no pet.). Applicant contends that his a p p e ll a te c o u n s e l re n d e r e d ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel failed to timely

notify Applicant that his conviction had be en af firmed and failed to advise himof2

his right to petition pro sefor discr etionary revie w. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. Ba sed on that aff idavit, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fa ct an d co n clus ions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been aff irmed and failed to a dvise him of his right to petition for discretionar

y revie w pro se . The trial court rec ommends that relief be grante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the First Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 01-12-00921- CR that aff irmed his conviction in Cause No. 1338550 from the 338th District Court of Har ris County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: Novembe r 19, 2014 Do not publish
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned,Thomas W. Colligan,
the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer ofYACHT FINDERS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2009(the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed
this statement this11thday ofMay,
2009.





/s/ Thomas W. ColliganThomas W. ColliganChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided toYACHT
FINDERS, INC.and will be retained byYACHT FINDERS,
INC.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00412

- CV

BRAZIN BASNET APPELLANT

V.

NMRATA KHADKA APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 32 4TH DISTRICT COURT O F TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 324

- 626759

- 17

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On November 28, 2017

, and December 12, 2017, we notified appellant in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that w e would dismiss this

appeal unless the $ 205 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant has not paid the $ 205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate pro cedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28 , 20 15

, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 4, 2018

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- D istrict Litigation

, Misc. Dock et No. 15

- 9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals ’ fees).
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of China Infrastructure Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.             The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.             The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.




Date:         
May 14, 2010





/s/  Zhang
      ChunxianName:
      Zhang ChunxianTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and
                Accounting
      Officer and Director





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the amended quarterly Report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: October 25, 2010 /s/Frank Pioppi     Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00681-CV

Derrasette Westbrook, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 212,847-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of

Derrasette Westbrook to her minor child, F.M. Westbrook’s court-appointed attorney filed

an Anders brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders. See Taylor v. Texas Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646-47

(Tex. App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of

parental rights).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to Westbrook, who was advised of her right

to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the

record, we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal, and we agree that the appeal
2

is frivolous and without merit. We affirm the judgment of the trial court and further grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw as attorney.

 

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: August 29, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of China Infrastructure Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.




Date: May 15,
      2009
              
              /s/ Zhang
      ChunxianName:
      Zhang ChunxianTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer  and Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dimeco, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Gary C. Beilman, Chief Executive Officer, and Maureen H. Beilman, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Gary C. Beilman     |  |  |  | /s/ Maureen H. Beilman 
|Gary C. Beilman         |  |  |  | Maureen H. Beilman     
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | 
|Date: March 22, 2007    |  |  |  |
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We have issued our reports dated September 13, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedules (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the application of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 123(R) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior YearMisstatements when Qualifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” as of June 30,2007) and accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controlsover financial reporting) included in the Annual Report of Moldflow Corporation on Form 10-K forthe year ended June 30, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports inthe Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-112696) and Form S-8 (No. 333-102833, No.333-46162, No. 333-100122, No. 333-119025, No. 333-70124 and No. 333-140524)./s/ Grant Thornton LLP
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19640-19641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10953]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,737]


B&A MFG., INC.; Weaver, AL, Including Leased Workers of Skil 
Staff, Alexander City, AL; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility 
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 23, 1996, applicable 
to all workers at B&A Mfg., Inc. located in Weaver, Alabama. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on March 19, 1996 (61 FR 11224).
    At the request of the company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Based on the new 
findings, the Department is amending the certification to include 
leased workers from Skil Staff, Alexander City, Alabama. B&A Mfg., 
Inc., a children's sportswear and t-shirt producer, contracted with 
Skil Staff for workers and payroll services. Accordingly, some of the 
workers at B&A Mfg., Inc. had their Unemployment Insurance (UI) wages 
paid by Skil Staff.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of B&A Mfg., Inc. adversely affected by imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,737 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of the B&A Mfg., Inc., Weaver, Alabama, and workers 
from Skil Staff, Alexander City, Alabama who were laid off for lack 
of work in adversely affected employment by B&A Mfg., Inc., who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
November 27, 1994 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.


[[Page 19641]]


    Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-10953 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/S/ DON
WILSON


________________________________


Don
Wilson


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)





Dated:  January
20, 2010










Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





3.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


4.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/S/ DAVID
POMERANTZ


__________________________


David
Pomerantz


Principal
Financial Officer and


Principal
Accounting Officer





Dated:  January
20, 2010
** **

**Exhibit21.1**

** **

**SUBSIDIARIESOF STATION CASINOS, INC.**

 

 

**PalaceStation Hotel & Casino, Inc.**

**BoulderStation, Inc.**

**TexasStation, LLC**

**SunsetStation, Inc.**

**Santa FeStation, Inc.**

**FiestaStation, Inc.**

**RanchoStation, LLC**

**LakeMead Station, Inc.**

**TropicanaStation, Inc.**

**CharlestonStation, LLC**

**MagicStar Station, LLC**

**GoldRush Station, LLC**

**PalmStation, LLC**

**Fiesta Palms, LLC (6.7% ownership)**

**GreenValley Station, Inc.:**

**Town Center Amusements, Inc.**

**d.b.a. Barley’s Casino & BrewingCompany (50% ownership)**

**GV RanchStation, Inc.:**

**Green Valley Ranch Gaming, LLC (50%ownership)**

**DurangoStation, Inc.**

**Front Street Station, LLC**

**StationHoldings, Inc.**

**Town Center Station, LLC**

**Carey Station Holdings, LLC**

**Fiesta Station Holdings, LLC**

**Lake Mead Station Holdings, LLC**

**VistaHoldings, LLC**

**CenterlineHoldings, LLC**

**StationCalifornia, LLC**

**StationDevelopment, LLC**

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21450-21451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11688]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-228-000]


Mobile Bay Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 6, 1996.
    Take notice than on May 2, 1996, Mobile Bay Pipeline Company (MBPC) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective June 1, 1996:

Title Page

[[Page 21451]]

Third Revised Sheet No. 4
First Revised Sheet No. 23
First Revised Sheet No. 49
First Revised Sheet No. 129
First Revised Sheet No. 184
First Revised Sheet No. 272

    MBPC states that the tariff sheets listed above are being filed to 
bring MBPC's tariff in compliance with the Order No. 582. MBPC also 
states that the tariff modifications include MBPC's conversion to 
thermal rather than volumetric units, a tariff statement describing its 
lateral line policy, and revising the cites to the Commission's 
regulations where these cites are now different as a result of Order 
No. 582.
    MBPC also states that the revised tariff sheets are being served 
upon all its customers, State Commissions, and other interested 
parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a Motion to 
Intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11688 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald HAMPTON, Appellant. Ronald T. HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48747, WD 51453.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 17, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and BERREY and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal pursuant to Rule 29.15(i). Appellant appeals his convictions by jury for two counts of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, one count of murder in the second degree, § 565.021, one count of assault in the second degree, § 565.060, and four counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

Appellant’s convictions and the denial of his Rule 29.15 are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).