alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
   1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Annual Report of Newport International Group Inc. (
   the Company ) on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
   the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the " report" ),
   I Soloman Lam, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
   Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to
   Section 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:
   (1) The report fully comlies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
       Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.




                                              /s/ Soloman Lam
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

                                              Date: May 21, 2003
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------



The Fuji Bank and Trust Company, Trustee
JCP Master Credit Card Trust:


We have examined General Electric Capital Corporation (GE Capital) management's
assertions that the Monthly Servicer's Certificates for JCP Master Credit Card
Trust Asset Backed Certificates - Series E (Class A) for each of the months in
the twelve month period ended December 31, 2001, have been prepared in
accordance with the requirements as set forth in Subsection 3.4(c) of the Master
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 5, 1988, and amended by
Amendment No. 1 dated as of October 15, 1997, and Amendment No. 2 dated as of
October 15, 1999, and as supplemented by the Series A, Series B, Series C,
Series D and Series E Supplements thereto (the "Master Pooling and Servicing
Agreement"). Management is responsible for the preparation of the Monthly
Servicer's Certificates to comply with those requirements. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on GE Capital's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about GE Capital's
compliance with the aforementioned requirements of the Master Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the preparation of the Monthly Servicer's Certificates in
accordance with the specified requirements.

In our opinion, GE Capital complied, in all material respects, with the
aforementioned requirements of the Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement during
the respective periods ended December 31, 2001.


                                                              /s/ KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 2002
Exhibit
32.1
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
   SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Bluesky Systems Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and
on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date: May
14,
2010                                                                         By: /s/ Duane
Bennett
 Duane
Bennett
 Chief Executive Officer &
 Chief
Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 110 (Thursday, June 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Collaborative Research Projects (PAR-18-
951).
    Date: July 21, 2021.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rajiv Kumar, Ph.D., Branch Chief, Blood and 
Vascular Branch, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, 
Lung, and Blood Institute, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 208-W, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-827-4612, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb998a81829dc5809e868a99ab858283c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="acdecdc6c5da82c7d9c1cddeecc2c5c482cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 4, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12141 Filed 6-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2148

___________

George L. Fuller, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Paul K. Delo, Superintendent; * District Court for the

Unknown Harris, Major; Unknown * Eastern District of Missouri.

Nichols, Captain; Unknown *

Underwood, Sgt.; Unknown Bergner, * [UNPUBLISHED]

CO I; Unknown Kohut, Sgt.; Unknown *

Gregor, Sgt.; Unknown Gibson, CO I; *

Unknown Allen, CO I; Unknown *

Brown, CO I; Unknown Cayabyab, *

Dr.; Cathy Stewart; Deannal Hutchins; *

Nancy Times; Desiray Cracker; *

Unknown Conway, Sgt.; Unknown *

Hensen, CO I; Ron Harris, Employee *

at P.C.C., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 15, 1998

 Filed: May 21, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________
The Honorable Frederick R. Buckles, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

PER CURIAM.

George L. Fuller, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the District Court’s order

1

dismissing some defendants, and granting summary judgment for the remaining

defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) suit. Fuller also appeals the denial of his

Federal Rule Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. After consideration of our jurisdiction of

this appeal, we conclude this appeal was timely filed, and deny appellees’ motion to

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’

submissions, we deny Fuller’s pending motions, and conclude that the District Court

did not commit error in its order dismissing and granting summary judgment for the

reasons it stated. We further conclude the District Court did not abuse its discretion

in denying Fuller’s Rule 60(b) motion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11426]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ES96-25-000]


Semass Partnership; Notice of Application

May 2, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 30, 1996, Semass Partnership (Semass) 
filed an application, under Sec. 204 of the Federal Power Act, seeking 
authorization to reallocate partnership interests among the existing 
partners of Semass in connection with the proposed sale by certain 
partners of Semass of eighty percent (80%) of the partnership interests 
in Semass.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before May 28, 1996. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11426 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Anpath Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned J. Lloyd Breedlove, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stephen Hoelscher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





|                     |                                                             
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2007 | By: /s/J. Lloyd Breedlove                                   
|                     | Name:  J. Lloyd Breedlove                                   
|                     | Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



|                     |                                                             
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2007 | By: /s/ Stephen Hoelscher                                   
|                     | Name: Stephen Hoelscher                                     
|                     | Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Raymond R. YOUNGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50575.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 18, 1995.

John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Raymond R. Younger appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 postconvietion motion following his guilty plea and conviction for stealing property valued at more than $150 in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced to five years incarceration to be served consecutively to the sentence imposed in a prior conviction.

The judgment of the motion court denying Mr. Younger’s Rule 24.035 postconviction motion is affirmed.

Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11469]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for 
Expansion of German Air Force Aircraft Operations, Holloman AFB, NM

    The United States Air Force will prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of 
operating additional German Air Force (GAF) Tornado aircraft at 
Holloman AFB. The proposed action would relocate 30 Tornado aircraft, 
equipment, and approximately 500 support personnel to Holloman. The 
proposed action would also include the construction of a new tactical 
target range within the existing impact area of the McGreagor Army 
Range, New Mexico, construction of additional support facilities at 
Holloman AFB, increased use of Military Training Routes (MTRs) and 
Military Operations Areas (MOAs). The United States Army and the Bureau 
of Land Management will be cooperating agencies in this EIS.
    No live ordnance would be used on the proposed new range. The 
proposed range would provide an air-to-ground weapons delivery site for 
air crews training in low level navigation, terrain following radar 
operations, and low level combat tactics. Aircraft would access the 
proposed range using existing MTRs. Alternatives under consideration 
include (1) Beddown of Tornado aircraft at Holloman but no air-to-
ground range and (2) The No Action alternative.
    The Air Force will conduct a series of scoping meetings to solicit 
public input concerning the proposed action and alternatives. Notice of 
the date, time and location of the meeting will be made available to 
public officials, the community, and the news media at a later date. 
For those unable to attend any of the scheduled scoping meetings, 
written comments will be accepted by the Air Force at the address below 
through July 1, 1996. The Air Force will accept appropriate comments at 
any time during the environmental analysis process.
    Please direct any written comments or requests for further 
information to: Ms. Sheryl Parker, HQ ACC/CEVA, Langley AFB, VA 23665-
2769, (804) 764-3328.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11469 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-W
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Torres, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered April 13, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, a former employee of the Louis Traubman Photo Lab, entered that establishment on July 20, 1987, displayed what appeared to be a gun to Michael Vanderleeuw, an employee who knew the defendant, and demanded the contents of the cash register. Defendant does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. Rather, he claims that certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial. Defendant concedes that, with one exception, as to which the court gave a curative instruction, the comments were not preserved for appellate review by specific objection *(People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641), and we decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice. In any event, wé have examined the comments, and were we to consider the issue, we would find the comments not objectionable and constituting fair comment on the facts, and fair *142response to the arguments made by defense counsel on summation *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 400). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Carro, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARCIA KUNTZWILER,

Appellant,

v.

ARROWHEAD CONDOMINIUMS, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1142

[August 12, 2021]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Keathan B. Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE20-004621.

Philippe Symonovicz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Scott R. Shapiro, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lawrence COLEMAN, Defendant/Appellant. Lawrence COLEMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

Nos. 64006, 66779.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

June 13, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.

*357Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Coleman appeals his conviction for first degree robbery, in violation of § 569.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1994. Coleman also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11535]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

[USITC SE-96-09]

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: May 29, 1996 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meeting
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. No. 731-TA-731 (Final) (Bicycles from the People's Republic 
of China)--briefing and vote.
5. Outstanding action jackets:
    1. ID-96-008, Initiation of an investigation under section 332 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 on South American trading partners' 
schedules of commitments.
    2. O/TATA-96-004, Report on S. 1550 (2-Amino-3-chlorobenzoic acid, 
methyl ester).

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 3, 1996.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11535 Filed 5-3-96; 3:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 20.2


                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON COMPLIANCE


Board of Directors
WFS Financial Inc

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the consolidated statement of financial condition of WFS
Financial Inc and Subsidiaries (WFS) as of December 31, 2000 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated January 22, 2001.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to
believe that WFS failed to, in all material respects, comply with the terms,
covenants, provisions or conditions of the Sale and Servicing Agreements for WFS
Financial Auto Loans, Inc. dated March 1, 2000, May 1, 2000, August 1, 2000 and
November 1, 2000 between Bankers Trust Company, Chase Manhattan Bank, and WFS
insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, it should be noted that
our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of
noncompliance.

This report is intended for the use and information of the Board of Directors
and management of WFS, Bankers Trust Company and Chase Manhattan Bank and should
not be used for any other purposes.



                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Los Angeles, California
January 22, 2001
RECEIVED IN

lUTtfLCnUftT QF COURT OF CRIMfMAt appeals

CdlMidAL AflfeALS OF TlXAS MAY 1B7niR

AUSTIk) •p\v/i5iQid

^belAGOste,Cteifo

Jl&USfijsJO.

STATf. OP T^A5, | MPLLLtt: $ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

^ ______: MAY 15 2015

-dOmtS-idQiO^A^U^/s^

i».<- U>S. (/in o-mi, o^o /lfi<n\ gH ^W ^23 MTl)

j£LA£&JUJbyt-&^

# iP&Qc&aiidG^J)^^

WTtm

13TH COURT,OF APPEALS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11427]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ES96-23-000]


Boston Edison Company; Notice of Application

May 2, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 26, 1996, Boston Edison Company filed an 
application, under Sec. 204 of the Federal Power Act, seeking 
authorization to issue short-term debt, from time to time, in an 
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $350 million, outstanding at 
any one time, on or before December 31, 1998, with final maturities no 
later than December 31, 1999.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 first Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before May 28, 1996. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11427 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M