alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30950

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

COREY EDWARD MICHAELS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CR-20066-2

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent 

Corey Edward Michaels on direct appeal has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Michaels was provided with a

copy of counsel’s Anders motion and brief but has not filed a

response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s
No. 02-30950

-2-

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel M. HANCOCK, Appellant. Daniel HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48518.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.

Decided March 12, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellants.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Daniel M. Hancock was convicted of assault in the first degree, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015. Hancock was sentenced as a prior, persistent and class X offender to 45 years imprisonment. Hancock appeals from his convictions and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. On appeal, Hancock claims that the trial court erred in denying his request to demonstrate to the jury that he is right-handed. He also claims that the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his trial counsel was ineffective for offering into evidence the Swiss Army knife he possessed at the time he was arrested.

*215Judgment is affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11063]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-175-001]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 29, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 24, 1996 Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 6B, Substitute 
Second Revised Sheet No. 250A and Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 
250B, to be effective April 13, 1996.
    WNG states that on March 13, 1996, it filed tariff sheets in this 
proceeding to be effective April 13, 1996, to discount its fuel charges 
in certain competitive situations for transactions involving no 
incremental fuel consumption. By order issued April 9, 1996, the 
Commission accepted the tariff sheets to become effective April 13, 
1996, subject to WNG filing, within 15 days of the issuance of the 
order, revised tariff sheets to reflect that WNG will assess a zero 
fuel charge for all transportation backhauls between the specified 
receipt and delivery points. The instant filing is being made to 
reflect this tariff change.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service list maintained by the Commission in the docket 
referenced above and on all jurisdictional customers and interested 
state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11063 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
OCIIALD c. MANN *.1--

. ..uAL June 5, 1939

Eonorable A, J, Brym, Jr, Crlmlnal Dirtriot Attorney Elllsboro, Texas

purpose when raid atea prior to the oseds are aotually

on the above bridly, as f 6, requesting our opinloa in raots whioh are,
,000 road bond irsue for tlie ing and operating maoaaamlred, lkes, or in aid bheraof, 8 oooparatlon with fhe **Works** that prior to the rale of the that the election had **raaultrd** tain W. P. A, projeot.6 whloh **wwre~lntendod** oaontyq.Lde road oonstruotion oontemplatad e. This a&ion lnourred oortaln bills or money was aotually~a~allable Iron the sale before thr appointment cbf a road sriperintsnbed by. the special Hill Oounty road’law, being Houss Bill No. 500, Ohaptsr 53 of the Speolal Lawa of Texas, passed by the Thirty-sixth Legislature.

It ooours to un that the anmer to this question must ultimatsly tost upon the datarmlnation of whether the wo& ~OIZN

### HonorableA. J. 

### Bxyan, Jr., Juno 5, 

### 1939, Faga g

was suoh aa would hare have been l



### armntialto

. . . .. _ _ been gone 19 anj l 

### yent or that would the 

### l aaoarpllrhment

of the 

### purpose for wnlon tne ctonas were v0t0a. It tha I*terrlnbtlon 18 in iavor 

### of the nooossltpof muohwork having been dolie 

### to thr ultimate aooompllahment

of the 

### lntendodpurpose of the bond laaue, than 

### it la the 

### oplnlon of thlr departmentthat the **bill8 inourrad,**  

### as reoited in rour letter,are properly 

### ohargaable **against** 

### the **p?oeeda** 

### of the **bond** 

### sale. Otherwlae,such obligation would **be** 

### & oharge only againstthe **road and**  brlbge **fund of**  the county. 

### In an6wer to rour roooixl question,it 

### lr our opinion that Sollowingthe appolntwnt OS the road 

### Buperlntendent, it beoomom 

### hl,m

duty to detrtinr.the proprietyot the work done, ana ii ha finds l

### mno to hate been work 8uoh a# he would hnve nquired 

### in the alrohar e pr;rsly approve 8uoh 

### b**fl** 

### of hIa autlea or oiilae,than ho aan 11 or 

### obligationin **tjmt brhalf**  **in**

l 

### Tha question8**rubmlttod** 

### are prlmarll~que8tlonaof **iaot** rather than of 

### law, and 

### onoo the facts are determinedwe think the Sor8goingoonolualon08~1 propbrlrbo **follqwed by**  the County 

### AuQltor in allowingor dl8allowingthe 

### paymnt of suoh blllm. Very truly yourn All’ORNEY 

### OENXFAL OF 

### TEXB

A!X"l'O?UGXdENERAL

OFTEXAS

I
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Vannessa Ventures Ltd. for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  October 11, 2007





/s/ John R. Morgan

John R. Morgan

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ancona Mining Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Hugh Grenfal, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 5th day of September, 2003.

| | /s/ Hugh Grenfal, Jr.
Hugh Grenfal, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











---
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SoftBrands, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ RANDAL B. TOFTELANDRandal B. ToftelandPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of China Infrastructure Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2.The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.




Date:February 12,
2010





/s/   Li
    XipengName:
      Li XipengTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer Chairman of the
      Board





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11710]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD SUNSHINE ACT MEETING

TIME AND DATE: 8:00 a.m., May 20, 1996.

PLACE: 4th Floor, Conference Room, 1250 H Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

    1. National Finance Center record keeping.
    2. Congressional/agency/participant liaison.
    3. Benefits administration.
    4. Investments.
    5. Participant communications.
    6. Approval of the minutes of the last meeting.
    7. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive 
Director.
    8. Review of selection criteria for software vendor.
    9. Approval of the update of the FY 1996 budget and FY 1997 
estimates.
    10. Investment policy review.
    11. Status of audit recommendations.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
Roger W. Mehle, Executive Director,
Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 96-11710 Filed 5-7-96; 12:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12468]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11445]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Surrealism Beyond Borders'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Surrealism Beyond Borders'' at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a293f392e333534686e6f631a292e3b2e3f743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="44372127302d2b2a7670717d0437302530216a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000.

Matthew R. Lussenhop,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-12468 Filed 6-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                             Compliance Certificate
                pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Master Indenture
                                   relating to
                    Associates Credit Card Master Note Trust

         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Associates
National Bank (Delaware) ("ANB"), on behalf of Associates Credit Card Master
Note Trust (the "Trust"), and in accordance with the direction contained in
Section 1(a)(N) of the Administration Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2000, as
amended, by and among the Trust, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), and ANB as
Administrator, hereby certifies on behalf of the Trust, pursuant to Section 3.09
of the Master Indenture, dated as of April 1, 2000 (the "Indenture"), between
the Issuer, and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee, that:

         1.       A review of the activities of the Issuer during the 12-month
                  period ending and the performance of the Issuer under the
                  Indenture during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, has
                  been made under my supervision; and

         2.       To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer
                  has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
                  Indenture throughout the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

         Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the Indenture.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 30th day of March, 2001.

                                                   ASSOCIATES NATIONAL BANK
                                                   (DELAWARE)


                                                   By:  /s/ CHERYL K. DEBARO
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Cheryl K. Debaro
                                                        Authorized Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM KINJO SMITH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00421-LMB-1; 

1:16-cv-00821-LMB)

Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Kinjo Smith, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Kinjo Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
10.29


 


 


Power
of Attorney


 


This
is to authorize Beijing Sihitech Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing Sihitech) to be
entitled with all the shareholder rights of my investment of RMB600,000 in
Beijing Sihitech Software Co.,Ltd., including but not limited to: voting
rights, nomination rights, rights to dividends and retained earnings,
transferring and collateral rights. Beijing Sihitech is entitled to all the
shareholder’s rights as well as associated risks and responsibilities within
the effective period of time of this authorization.


 


From
this date on, Beijing Sihitech Software regards and treats Beijing Sihitech as
me myself in every aspect of the relationship between the company and the
shareholders; Beijing Sihitech is entitled to sign all the legal documents and
execute all the shareholder rights on behalf of me; Beijing Sihitech is
entitled to grant Power of Attorney to others with regards to my shareholder
rights.


 


This
authorization is irrevocable and effective till the date when Beijing Sihitech
Software ceases to operate.


 


 


Signature:


 


/s/
Wu Hong


October
21, 2002