alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC")  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Michael D.  Keough,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Michael D. Keough
---------------------

Michael D. Keough
Chief Executive Officer

April 12, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MITCHELL TAEBEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. COUNTY OF MARICOPA; DOUG DUCEY, AZ Governor; MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, AZ Attorney General; MARICOPA COUNTY OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES; MARICOPA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE; DONALD J. TRUMP; WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 21-16919 D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01294-ROS-CDB
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 16, 2022 ** San Francisco, California 

# FILED
AUG 18 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

* * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Mitchell Taebel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment and order of dismissal for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Taebel brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various government officials following his arrest and detention. We dismiss the appeal. Taebel’s Opening Brief does not comply with the briefing rules set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28, Ninth Circuit Rule 28-1, or Ninth Circuit Rule 28-2. Taebel did not even use the Ninth Circuit’s Informal Opening Brief form. See 9th Cir. R. 28-1(c). In addition, while we are not required to consider the merits, even construing Taebel’s Opening Brief liberally, 1 it does not make a meritorious argument, and the district court did not err 2 in dismissing his Second Amended Complaint. See N/S Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. , 127 F.3d 1145, 1146–47 (9th Cir. 1997); Greenwood v. F.A.A. , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994). Thus, we strike Taebel’s Opening Brief and dismiss the appeal. See N/S Corp. , 127 F.3d at 1146–47; Stevens v. Sec. Pac. Nat’l. Bank , 538 F.2d 1387, 1389

1 Blaisdell v. Frappiea , 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013).
2 Watison v. Carter , 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). 21-16919 2(9th Cir. 1976); cf. Carter v. Comm’r. , 784 F.2d 1006, 1008–09 (9th Cir. 1986).

DISMISSED.

21-16919 3
EXHIBIT 99(a)(1)




                         Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc.:

We have examined CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc.'s (the Company) compliance
with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005. The portfolios covered by this
assertion include CitiFinancial Mortgage Securities Inc. REMIC Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2002-1, 2003-1, 2003-2, 2003-3, 2003-4, and 2004-1.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc.'s compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with the minimum
servicing standards regarding mortgagor accounting applicable to CitiFinancial
Mortgage Company, Inc. during the year ended December 31, 2005. Adjustments to
ARM loans were not made in accordance with the related mortgage note and any ARM
rider. Specifically, interest rates were not updated with the most recent index
rate when the scheduled rate change date occurred on a non-business day.
Additionally, for some loans the specified rate index per the loan documents was
not reflected correctly in the servicing system.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the third
paragraph, CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc. complied in all material
respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2005.

                         /s/ KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 24, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bluesky Systems Corporation (the "Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Duane Bennett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 *   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Duane Bennett
 Duane Bennett
 President, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer, Controller
 
 August 11, 2009
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**(Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Global Geophysical Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,P. Mathew Verghese, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  August 05, 2010 | /s/  P. Mathew Verghese                            |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                         | P.  Mathew Verghese                                |
|                         | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
**Exhibit** **32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In  connection with the amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of VisualMED  Clinical Solutions Corp (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended  June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard Dab, Principal Executive Officer,  Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ Gerard Dab |
|----------------|

Gerard Dab

| Principal Executive Officer, Secretary and a |
|----------------------------------------------|

member of the Board of Directors  

| February        14,  2006 |
|-------------------------------------|

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

 

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 112 (Monday, June 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Bioengineering of Neuroscience, Vision and Low Vision Technologies 
Study Section, June 16, 2021, 8:00 a.m. to June 17, 2021, 07:00 p.m., 
National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register on June 
08, 2021, 86 FR 30466.
    This notice is being amended to change the meeting start time from 
8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 9, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12413 Filed 6-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Robert M. Kellman, Respondent, v Kaye L. Kellman, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from two orders of Supreme Court that denied her motion to vacate a default judgment of divorce in favor of plaintiff, and denied her motion for ancillary relief, including temporary maintenance, custody and continued health insurance coverage. The motions were properly denied. Defendant does not challenge the propriety of the default divorce, but contends that the separation agreement is unfair. Where, as here, the separation agreement is incorporated but not merged into the divorce judgment, vacatur of the divorce judgment has no effect on the enforceability of the agreement; , the agreement survives as a separate and enforceable contract. Defendant is relegated to a plenary action to rescind or reform the agreement under principles of equity *(see, e.g., Lambert v Lambert,*142 AD2d 557, 558; *Mastrogiacomo v Mastrogiacomo,*133 AD2d 671; *Culp v Culp,*117 AD2d 700, 701; *see generally, Christian v Christian,*42 NY2d 63).

As a corollary, it was proper for the court to deny defen*959dant’s request for ancillary relief and to defer those requests to Family Court. That result is mandated by the judgment of divorce and the separation agreement. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.—vacate default divorce.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5462 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act to require that the slaughter date, package date, freeze date, 

and country of origin be labeled on meat and poultry products. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. SANTOS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry 

Products Inspection Act to require that the slaughter 

date, package date, freeze date, and country of origin 

be labeled on meat and poultry products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MANDATORY LABELING REQUIREMENTS FOR 

4 MEAT AND POULTRY. 

5 (a) FEDERAL MEAT INSPECTION ACT.—Section 1(n) 

6 of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601(n)) 

7 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5462 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(13) if it fails to bear, directly thereon or on 

7 its container, as the Secretary may by regulations 

8 prescribe— 

9 ‘‘(A) the slaughter date; 

10 ‘‘(B) the package date; 

11 ‘‘(C) if frozen, the freeze date; 

12 ‘‘(D) the country of origin; or 

13 ‘‘(E) if the country of origin is the United 

14 States, the State of origin.’’. 

15 (b) POULTRY PRODUCT INSPECTION ACT.—Section 

16 4(h) of the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 

17 453(h)) is amended— 

18 (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

19 end; 

20 (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at 

21 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

22 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(13) if it fails to bear, directly thereon or on 

24 its container, as the Secretary may by regulations 

25 prescribe— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5462 IH

1 ‘‘(A) the slaughter date; 

2 ‘‘(B) the package date; 

3 ‘‘(C) if frozen, the freeze date; 

4 ‘‘(D) the country of origin; or 

5 ‘‘(E) if the country of origin is the United 

6 States, the State of origin.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee, Chief Financial Officer of Bio-Bridge Science, Inc.,
(the "Company), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Bridge Science,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


                           Date: November 13, 2006

                           /s/ Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee
                           -------------------------------
                           By:  Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee
                           Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21498-21499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11652]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Telecommunications Information 
Distribution Research Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 29, 1996, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Advanced 
Telecommunications information Distribution Research Consortium 
(``ATIRP Consortium'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade

[[Page 21499]]

Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the 
nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are 
the United States of America, represented by U.S. Army Research 
Laboratories (``ARL''), Adelphi, MD; Sanders, a Lockheed Martin 
Company, Nashua, NH; Bell Communications Research, Inc., Morristown, 
NJ; City University of New York, City College, New York, NY; University 
of Delaware, Newark, DE; GTE Laboratories, Inc., Waltham, MA; Howard 
University, Washington, DC; University of Maryland, College Park, MD; 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; Morgan State 
University, Baltimore, MD; and Motorola, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ.
    The nature of the ATIRP Consortium is to conduct research in the 
area of telecommunications and information distribution for a limited 
duration to gain further knowledge and understanding of emerging 
technologies. Through its partnerships, the Consortium will forge 
cooperative relationships with the customer community to develop 
innovative ideas and applications for new telecommunications and 
information distribution technologies.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-11652 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Converted by EDGARwiz







		
	 
	Ivanhoe Energy Inc.

5060 California Avenue, Suite 410

Bakersfield, CA 93309

Tel: 661-869-8339 Fax: 619-869-2820







October 2. 2006

Mr. Barry C. J. Ehrl, President and CEO

Derek Oil and Gas Corporation 

1111 West Hastings Street, Suite 1201

Vancouver, BC V6E 2J3 Canada




Dear Barry:

Ivanhoe Energy has received your letter of September 12 and the Authorization for Expenditure to expand the Lower Newcastle steamflood with a vertical program. Since we have not planned for a vertical program, evaluation of your plan took a bit longer than expected. Although we recognize the potential of your proposal, we see many risks associated with it. In your letter you suggest removing Ivanhoe from the project in a "mutually beneficial manner". With this in mind, we propose selling our interest in LAK Ranch to Derek for $800,000.

The proposed sale of our interest is contingent on the execution of a definitive agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) between Ivanhoe Energy and Derek Resources. The Purchase Agreement shall supersede this letter, and will contain provisions customarily included in agreements between sophisticated parties in similar transactions.

If Derek as Buyer agrees to enter into negotiations with Ivanhoe Energy as Seller concerning the transaction contemplated in this letter, please execute below in the space provided and return to Seller one copy of this letter on or before October 13, 2006.

Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, either park may terminate the negotiations pertaining to the transaction proposed in this letter, with or without cause prior to the execution of the Purchase Agreement. In such event, the parties hereto shall have no further obligation hereunder.

This sale is subject to the approval of Seller's Board of Directors. 

Very truly yours,

/s/ Joe Gasca

President




Approved this 20th day of October, 2006




Derek Resources, Inc.




/s/

B. Ehrl




Title: President and CEO, 

Derek Oil and Gas Corporation