alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Alfred J. SmallAlfred J. SmallChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 32
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00446

- CV

John THOMAS

, Appe llant

v.

Cynthia THOMAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 45C

Honorable Robert R. Barton, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee's Motion to Dismiss is hereby MOOT.

It is so O RDERED on September 17, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 112 (Monday, June 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    The NIH published a document in the Federal Register of May 18, 
2021, concerning the meeting of the Synapses, Cytoskeleton and 
Trafficking Study Section. The document contained an incorrect point of 
contact.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 18, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-10466, on 
page 26924, in the third column, under Name of Committee: Molecular, 
Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; 
Synapses, Cytoskeleton and Trafficking Study Section, correct ``Contact 
Person'' to read: Carol Hamelink, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9a1a8a4aca5a0a7aa89aababbe7a7a0a1e7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee868f838b8287808dae8d9d9cc0808786c0898198">[email protected]</span></a>, (301) 213-9887.

    Dated: June 9, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12412 Filed 6-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 2, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00246-CR

ALEJANDRO GAONA-PINEDA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1274050

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A written request to withdraw the notice of appeal in this case, personally 

signed by appellant, has been filed with this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. 

Because this Court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant's request.

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the Clerk of the 

Court to issue the mandate of the Court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and Jamison

Do Not Publish - Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 104 DB 2023 (No. 62 RST 2023)

:

ALLAN WILLIAM BROWN : Attorney Registration No. 80313

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2023, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated September 11, 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that ALLAN WILLIAM BROWN, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that 

he has the moral qualifications, competency, and learning in law required for admission 

to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
EXHIBIT NUMBER 4.50





           AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT WITH JUAN DEMETRIO LIRIO JR.
                            AND JUAN DEMETRIO LIRIO
                  REPRESENTING LIR-FER CONSTRUCCIONES S.R.L.
                            DATED DECEMBER 27, 2002
















                                                                             136

<PAGE>


AMENDMENT LIRIO II, DECEMBER 27, 2002


The only  amendment  introduced on December 27th was that the 2002 December 30th
payment of US$40,000 was split in two payments:

     US$25,000 on December 30th 2002
     US$15,000 July 31st 2003.

The rest of the contract remains without modifications.

















                                                                             137

<PAGE>



En la ciudad de San Juan a veintisiete  dias del mes de diciembre de dos mil dos
se reunen Inversiones Mineras Argentinas SA.(IMA)  Representada en este acto por
el Dr.  Ricardo  Lopez  Aragon, por una parte,  y el Sr.  Juan  Demetrio  Lirio
LE.6.703.839,  en calidad de cesionario de los derechos que en el contrato tenia
LIR-Fer SRL y el Sr. Juan Demetrio Lirio  DNI.16.742.047,  ambos por la otra,  a
efectos de:

PRIMERA:  Las partes  tienen  suscrito  contrato de opcion de compra de derechos
mineros con fecha 19 de noviembre de 1998.

SEGUNDA:  Con fecha diez de julio de dos mil dos enmendaron los plazo en que IMA
realizaria  los pagos  acordados.  Respecto  al  establecido  para el dia 30 de
diciembre 2002 de U$S 40.000, los firmantes convienen y establecen una reduccion
del  importe de este pago a la suma de U$S 25.000 y  establecer  una nueva cuota
con vencimiento el dia 31 de julio de 2003 de U$S 15.000.  Las partes  ratifican
en un todo los restantes  `plazos de pago y los importes que a cada uno de ellos
corresponden.

TERCERA:  En todo lo no  modificado  en este acuerdo  ,tiene  plena  vigencia el
contrato original y las enmiendas introducidas a ella por las partes ,las cuales
las ratifican.

En Lugar y fecha indicado se suscriben  cuatro  ejemplares de un mismo tenor y a
un solo efecto.-


/s/ Ricardo Lopez Aragon                    /s/ Juan Demetrio Lirio

                                            /s/ Juan Demetrio Lirio Jr.







                                                                             138
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10942]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2374]


United States International Telecommunications, 
Radiocommunications Sector, Study Group 4; Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces that the United States 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC) 
Radiocommunications Sector Study Group 4 will meet on May 21, 1996 at 
2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in Room 847 at the Federal Communications 
Commission (FCC), 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC.
    Study Group 4 deals with matters relating to the fixed satellite 
service. The meeting agenda is as follows: (1) Review of the Activities 
of WP 4A, 4B, 4-9S, 4SNG; (2) Discussion of Industry and Government 
Support for the FSS Handbook; (3) Discussion of Resolution 18 Issues, 
(a) SCRPM Activities, (b) WRC '97 Preparatory Activities, (c) WP4A 
Activities; (4) Preparations for Future International Meetings; (5) 
Other Business
    Members of the General Public may attend the meetings and join in 
the discussions, subject to the instructions of the chairman, Dr. 
Robert Hedinger, (908) 234-7550.

    Dated: April 24, 1996.
Warren G. Richards,
Chairman, U.S. ITR-R National Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-10942 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30588-30589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12034]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-59-2021]


Approval of Expansion of Subzone 18F, Lam Research Corporation, 
Newark, California

    On April 14, 2021, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the City of San 
Jose, grantee of FTZ 18, requesting an expansion of Subzone 18F, 
subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 18, on behalf of Lam 
Research Corporation, in Newark, California.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public

[[Page 30589]]

comment (86 FR 20658-20659, April 21, 2021). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board 
Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to expand 
Subzone 18F was approved on June 3, 2021, subject to the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject 
to FTZ 18's 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: June 3, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-12034 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

/s/ DON WILSON________________________________Don WilsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: January 14, 2008























Page 20 of 21

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Compass KnowledgeHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10K-SB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date below (the “Report”), I, Rogers W. Kirven, Jr., Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/  Rogers W. Kirven, Jr.

Rogers W. Kirven, Jr. 

Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5948 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5948

  To terminate the Office of Gun Violence Prevention in the Executive 
 Office of the President and prohibit the establishment of any similar 
               successor office, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 2023

  Mr. Rosendale (for himself, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Higgins of 
 Louisiana, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Crane, 
       Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Collins) introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To terminate the Office of Gun Violence Prevention in the Executive 
 Office of the President and prohibit the establishment of any similar 
               successor office, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF THE OFFICE OF GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION.

    (a) In General.--The Office of Gun Violence Prevention in the 
Executive Office of the President shall be terminated as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Prohibition on Successor Offices.--The President may not 
establish any successor office to the Office of Gun Violence 
Prevention.
    (c) Limit Use of Federal Funds.--No Federal funds may be obligated 
or expended for the salaries or expenses of any officer or employee of 
an office described in subsection (a) or (b).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 19

- 13399 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:03

- cr - 14041

- KMM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus PATRICK FREDERICK WILLIAMS

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ ( September 10, 2020 ) Before WILSON , LUCK , and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-13399 Date Filed: 09/10/2020 Page: 1 of 22 Patrick Frederick Williams moved to reduce his sentence under section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018 , Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222, § 404 . The district court denied Williams’s motion because, it concluded, he was ineligible for a reduction under section 404. Williams has appealed. When the district court denied Williams’s motion, it did not have the benefit
of our decision in United States v. Jones , 962 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2020). We do, and now that we do, the government has conceded “that Williams’s conviction is a covered offense under the First Step Act [section] 404(a)” and “he is eligible to have the district court consider whether to reduce his sentence in consideration of the statutory and guideline ranges that would apply ‘as if’ the Fair Sentencing Act’s higher crack amount thresholds were in effect.” Having review ed Jones and the record in this case, we agree with the government and accept its confession of error. We therefore vaca te the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings under the First Step Act and Jones

. VACATED and REMANDED . Case: 19-13399 Date Filed: 09/10/2020 Page: 2 of 2
#### Aaron Dwayne PROCTOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 0331-94.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 8, 1995.

*491Michael B. Charlton, Houston, for appellant.

Timothy G. Taft, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Robert A. Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

MALONEY, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at life imprisonment. The Court of Appeals held the conviction was jeopardy barred, *Proctor v. State,*806 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.App. — Eastland 1991), but this Court reversed and remanded to that court because the count at issue had been dismissed before jeopardy attached, *Proctor v. State,*841 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). On remand the conviction was affirmed. *Proctor v. State,*871 S.W.2d 225 (Tex.App. — Eastland 1994). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address whether appellant waived his claim alleging a violation of the statute of limitations.1

One week ago today this Court delivered *Lemell v. State,*915 S.W.2d 486 (Tex.Crim.App.1995). In that case, the defendant alleged that his conviction was invalid because there was insufficient evidence “that the offense occurred at a date prior to the presentment of the indictment and within the applicable limitations period.” *Id.*at 487. The Court of Appeals held that an indictment alleging an offense barred by the statute of limitations confers jurisdiction and the failure to timely object to the indictment waived any claim relating to the limitations defect. *Id*at 488. We reversed the Court of Appeals, explaining that the State had the burden of proving that the offense occurred within the statute of limitations. *Id.*at 489-90. Although a defendant’s failure to object to a limitations defect on the face of the indictment waives error as to the indictment defect, such failure to object does not relieve the State of its burden to prove at trial that the offense occurred within the limitations period. *Id.*at 489.

The Court of Appeals in the instant case held appellant waived his claim as to the statute of limitations due to his failure to object to the indictment. *Proctor,*871 S.W.2d at 229. We vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this cause to that court to reconsider this issue in light of *Lemell,*supra.

1

. Specifically, appellant alleges that “the Court of Appeals erred in its analysis of petitioner’s statute of limitations claim.” We also granted review of two other grounds, but given our dispo-sifion of appellant’s first ground, we dismiss those grounds without prejudice. *Lemell v. State,*915 S.W.2d at 487 n. 2 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) (and cases cited therein).

McCORMICK, P.J.,

dissents with note:

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in *Lemell,*I respectfully dissent. MANSFIELD, J., joins this note.

WHITE, J., dissents.

BAIRD, J., not participating.