alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11681]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-61-000]

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 6, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1996, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective June 1, 1996.

Third Revised Sheet No. 1
Second Revised Sheet No. 500

    El Paso states that tendered tariff sheets proposed to become 
effective June 1, 1996, revise the Index of Customers contained in 
Volume No. 1-A to comply with Section 154.111 of the Commission's 
Regulations. El Paso proposes to remove the Index of Customers in its 
Volume No. 1-A Tariff, since it is has posted an Index of Customers on 
its electronic bulletin board, pursuant to Section 286.106(c) of the 
Commission's Regulations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11681 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

Z.W., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2388

[June 13, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael J. Orlando, Judge; L.T. Case No. 23001255DLA.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7635

RICKY D. NELSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KAREN D. BROWN, Chairman of the Parole Board of Virginia 

“DOC”; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VDOC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:15-cv-00285-AWA-LRL)

Submitted: February 17, 2016 Decided: February 24, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky D. Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricky D. Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing his complaint without prejudice to his right to file 

a petition for a writ of habeas corpus or an amended complaint. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders of 

the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Nelson seeks to appeal 

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. See Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid, 807 F.3d 

619 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we deny Nelson’s motion to 

appoint counsel, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, 

and remand the case to the district court with instructions to 

allow Nelson to file an amended complaint or petition. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report
      of
      ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
      March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Manager


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JAIR O OSWALDO R OC HE-M EJIA, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 10-73702 Age n c y No. A070-958-620 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 14, 2013 ** B e fore : LEAVY, THOM AS, and M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s . Ja iro Oswa ldo R oc he -M e jia , a native and c itiz e n of Gua te m a la , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ations for a s y lum ,



# FIL ED MAY17 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).withholding of rem o v a l, a nd c anc e lla

tion of re m o va l . Our jurisdic t ion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e dism iss thepe tition for re vie w . W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r R oc he -M e jia ’ s c onte ntion tha

t he e sta blishe d pa st pe rse c ution a nd fe ars future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of im pute d politic a l opinion be c a

use he did not ra ise it to theB IA. Se e Vargas v . IN S , 831 F.2d 906, 907-08 (9th C ir. 1987) (“ Fa i lure to ra ise an issue in a n a ppe a l to theB IA c onstitute s a

fa ilure to e xha

u st re m e die s with re s pe c t to tha t que stion a

n d de prive s this c ourt of jurisdic tion to he ar the m atte r.” ). R oc he -M e jia doe s not othe rwise c ha lle nge the B IA’ s de nia l of a sy l um an d withholding of re

m ova l. Se e Tijani v . Holde r , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ Issue s not ra ise d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f are de e m e d wa ive d.” ). W e a lso la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r R oc he -M e jia ’ s c onte ntion re g arding a lle ge d due proc e ss viola

t ions re lat ing to thehe aring tra nsc ript be c a

use he fa ile d to ra ise it to theB IA. Se e Vargas , 832 F.3d a t 907-08. Fina lly , with re spe c t

to R oc he -M e

jia ’ s c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l c la i m , we la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r his c ha lle n ge to the a ge nc y ’ s ha rdship de te rm ination. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a)(2)(B )(i) ; Figue roa v . Muk ase y , 543 F.3d 487, 494 (9th C ir. 2008) (this c ourt la c ks jurisdic tion to re vie w B IA’ s disc re tiona ry de te rm ination that an a pplic ant for c anc e lla

t ion of re m ova l fa ile d to e s ta blish tha t his re m ova l

1 0 - 7 3 7 0 2 2would re sult in e xc e ptiona l a nd e xtre m e ly

unusua l ha

rdship to U.S. c i tiz e n re lative s). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D.

1 0 - 7 3 7 0 2 3
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF HEALTH
BENEFITS DIRECT CORPORATION REQUIRED


BY RULE
13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Health Benefits Direct Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Anthony R. Verdi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on
my knowledge:





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November
15, 2010





/s/
      ANTHONY R. VERDIAnthony
      R. VerdiChief
      Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 22072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11800]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Modified Consent Decree Pursuant To The 
Clean Water Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 C.F.R. Sec. 50.7, notice 
is hereby given that a proposed First Modification of Consent Decree in 
United States versus City of Macclenny, Florida and the State of 
Florida, Civil Action No. 89-454-Civ-J-14 was lodged on April 30, 1996, 
with the United States District Court for the Middle District of 
Florida, Jacksonville Division. This Modified Consent Decree relates to 
a Consent Decree previously entered in this matter on July 18, 1989. 
The 1989 Consent Decree resolved the United States' claims alleging 
violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., and its 
implementing regulations, and provided for stipulated penalties and 
injunctive relief.
    The Modified Consent Decree obligates the City to construct a 
wastewater treatment facility (the ``facility'') to insure consistent 
compliance by the City with its NPDES Permit. The Modified Consent 
Decree sets forth a schedule to begin construction of the facility by 
August 1, 1996, complete construction of the facility by July 1, 1997, 
and achieve and maintain continuous compliance with all NPDES permit 
effluent limitations by September 1, 1997.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Modified Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should 
refer to United States v. City of Macclenny, Florida, et al., DOJ Ref. 
#90-5-1-1-3206.
    The proposed Modified Consent Decree may be examined at the Office 
of the United States Attorney, Middle District of Florida, 500 Zack 
Street, Rm. 400, Tampa 33602; Office of the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region IV, 345 Courtland Street, N.E., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30365; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20005, 202-624-0892. A copy of the proposed Modified 
Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G. Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 
20005. In requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and 
enclose check in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction 
costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 96-11800 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6250

TIMOTHY POOLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM SMITH, Warden for The Maryland House

of Correction-Annex; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant

Warden for the Maryland House of CorrectionAnnex; OTHER UNNAMED DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-

270-AMD)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Poole, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Poole v. Smith, No. CA-96-270-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 5, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32051-32052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 32052]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Notice of Special Interest (NOSI): 
Availability of Emergency Awards for Limited Clinical Trials to 
Evaluate Therapeutic and Vaccine Candidates Against SARS-CoV-2.
    Date: July 14, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F21B, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maryam Feili-Hariri, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F21B, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5026, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86eee7f4eff4efebe0c6e8efe7efe2a8e8efeea8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d151c0f140f14101b3d13141c141953131415531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 10, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12624 Filed 6-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mary WILLIAMSON, Respondent, v. George E. GODAS and George’s Pizza and Steakhouse, Inc., Appellants.

No. WD 49640.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 25, 1995.

Charles W. Franklin, Franklin & Dowling, Fulton, for appellants.

*542Ann P. Hagan, Hagan & Maxwell, L.L.C., Mexico, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and FENNER and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

George E. Godas and George’s Pizza and Steakhouse, Inc., appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly Report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: May 12, 2010 /s/ Frank Pioppi Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.26

THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

This THIRD AMENDMENT is made as of the 23rd day of January,
2007 (the Effective Date), between H. SHANE HAMMOND (hereinafter referred to as Employee) and TRX, INC., a Georgia corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Company).

WHEREAS, Employee and the Company previously entered into that certain Employment Contract dated as of December 1,2003, as amended on April 28,
2005 and November 29,2006 (the Employment Contract); and

WHEREAS, the RESX Technologies business is comprised of certain
assets and obligations of TRX Technology Services, L.P. and TRX, Inc.; and

WHEREAS, Employee and the Company desire to further amend
certain terms and provisions of the Employment Contract.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and no/100 Dollars
($10.00) in hand paid each to the other and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Employee and the Company hereby agree to amend the Employment Contract as follows:



| | 1. | Section 1 of the Employment Contract is further amended by deleting the second paragraph and replacing it with the following:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duties and Responsibilities. Employee shall be employed as Executive Vice President of TRX, Inc., and President, RESX Technologies, reporting
directly to the President of the Company. As Executive Vice President of TRX, Inc., Employee shall have day-to-day responsibilities related to the RESX Technologies business, in addition to any specific duties and responsibilities as assigned to him
by the President of the Company. In addition, during the Term of this Employment Contract, Employee shall be responsible for preparing and submitting to the Company at least ninety (90) days prior to the end of the Companys calendar year
an annual budget and business plan for the upcoming calendar year. Said annual budget and business plan either shall be approved as submitted, or modified, revised, or amended by the Company and delivered to Employee as the annual budget and
business plan during the applicable calendar year. Employee agrees that he will not take any action inconsistent with the annual budget or business plan, as approved by the Company. It is expressly understood and agreed, however, that all actions,
responsibilities, and authority of Employee are, at all times, subject to the power and authority of the Company and its President to direct, review, alter, amend and modify such actions, responsibilities, and authority.



| | 2. | Except as specifically amended herein, the Employment Contract as previously amended shall remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment as of the date first above written.



EMPLOYEE:/s/ H. Shane HammondH. Shane HammondCOMPANY:TRX, INC./s/ Norwood H. Davis, IIINorwood H. Davis, IIIPresident & CEO
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 1 United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40364 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus JAIME SEQUEDA MORTERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-822-ALL

-------------------- ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mr. Mortera pleaded guilty to the charge of attempted illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and was2

sentenced to 21 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised relief. We previously affirmed his sentence. United States v. Mortera, 169 Fed. Appx. 203 (5th Cir. 2006). The Supreme Court has vacated and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Lopez
v. Gonzalez , 127 S.Ct. 625 (2006). Gutierrez-Tovar et al. v. United States, 127 S.Ct. 828 (2006). Following the Supreme Court's remand, we requested and received supplemental letter briefs from both parties regarding the impact of Lopez . Mr. Mortera has since completed his term of imprisonment; counsel concedes his removal. His appeal is therefore moot, according to binding circuit precedent. United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis , 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 2007) (“Because the defendant has been deported . . . and is legally unable, without permission of the Attorney General, to reenter the United States to be present for a resentencing proceeding as required by Rule 43, there is no relief we are able to grant him and his appeal is moot.”). We therefore DISMISS the appeal as to the judgment of sentence. We AFFIRM the judgment of3

conviction; Mr. Mortera’s arguments in that regard remain foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998).