Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices 22055

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of January 29 through February 2, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Jan. 29, 1996 .......... Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office West

Mifflin, Pennsylvania.

VSO–0082 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

applicant for employment at Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office would receive a hearing under CFR Part 710, entitled

‘‘Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material.’’

Jan. 30, 1996 .......... Briggs and Tillman, Inc., Clinton, Missouri.VEE–0015 Exception to the Reporting Requirements. If granted: Briggs

and Tillman, Inc. would not be required to file Form EIA–

782B Reseller’s/Retailer’s Monthly Petroleum Products

Sales Report.

Jan. 31, 1996 .......... Albuquerque Operations Office, Washington DC.VSX–0020 Remand for Opinion under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: The

August 11, 1995 Opinion of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Case Number VSO–0020, is remanded, and the

OHA Hearing Officer will consider the individual’s eligibility

for access authorization.

Feb. 2, 1996 ........... Kenneth H. Besecker, Martinez, Georgia VFA–0124 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 22, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Office of Economic Impact and Diversity

would be rescinded, and Kenneth H. Besecker would receive access to certain DOE information.

[FR Doc. 96–11915 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of

February 26 Through March 1, 1996

During the week of February 26

through March 1, 1996, the appeals and

applications for exception or other relief

listed in the Appendix to this Notice

were filed with the Office of Hearings

and Appeals of the Department of

Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of February 26 through March 1, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Feb. 26, 1996 ......... Visa Petroleum, Inc., Fresno, California VEE–0017 Exception to the Reporting Requirements. If granted: Visa

Petroleum, Inc., would not be required to file Form EIA–

782B ‘‘Reseller’s/Retailer’s Monthly Petroleum Product

Sales Report.’’

Feb. 27, 1996 ......... Tajon, Inc., Industry, Pennsylvania ......... RR272–233 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The December 1, 1995 Decision

and Order Case No. RC272–325, issued to Tajon, Inc., regarding the firm’s application for refund submitted in the

crude oil refund proceeding would be modified.

Feb. 28, 1996 ......... David K. Hackett, Knoxville, Tennessee VFA–0135 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

June 30, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Oak Ridge Operations Office would be rescinded, and David K. Hackett would receive access to

certain DOE information.

Feb. 26, 1996 ......... Nevada Operations Office, North Las

Vegas, Nevada.

VSA–0049 Request for Review of Opinion under 10 CFR Part 710. If

granted: At the request of an individual employed at the

Nevada Operations Office, the January 4, 1996 Opinion of

the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Case No. VSO–0049,

would be reviewed.
22056 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices

[FR Doc. 96–11916 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of

February 5 Through February 9, 1996

During the week of February 5

through February 9, 1996, the appeals

and applications for exception or other

relief listed in the Appendix to this

Notice were filed with the Office of

Hearings and Appeals of the Department

of Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, DC 20585–0107.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of February 5 through February 9, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Feb. 2, 1996 ........... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, NM.VSO–0083 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at the Albuquerque Operations Office

would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

——Do .................... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, NM.VSO–0084 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at the Albuquerque Operations Office

would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

Feb. 5, 1996 ........... Keith E. Loomis, Waterford, NY .............. VFA–0125 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 3, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by Schenectady Naval Reactors would be rescinded,

and Keith E. Loomis would receive access to certain DOE

information.

Feb. 6, 1996 ........... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, NM.VSA–0051 Request for Review of Opinion under 10 CFR Part 710. If

granted: The December 28, 1995 Opinion of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals, Case No. VSO–0051, would be reviewed at the request of an individual employed at the Albuquerque Operations Office.

——Do .................... Florida Hospital Medical Center, Orlando, FL.RR272–231 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The May 3, 1995 Dismissal, Case

No. RF272–88662, issued to Florida Hospital Medical Center would be modified regarding the firm’s application for

refund submitted in the Crude Oil refund proceeding.

——Do .................... Georgina Jacobs, Walla Walla, WA ........ VFA–0126 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 28, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the External Affairs Office of the Richland Operations Office would be rescinded, and Georgina Jacobs

would receive access to certain Department of Energy information.

——Do .................... William H. Payne, Albuquerque, NM ....... VFA–0128 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The August 7, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by Los Alamos National Laboratories would be rescinded, and William H. Payne would receive access to

certain DOE information.

Feb. 7, 1996 ........... Burns Concrete, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID ...... VFA–0127 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 12, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office would be

rescinded, and Burns Concrete, Inc. would receive access

to certain DOE information.

——Do .................... Melvin Gordon, Streamwood, IL .............. RR304–71 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Arco Refund Proceeding. If granted: The April 5, 1993 Dismissal Letter,

Case Number RF304–9273, issued to Melvin Gordon

would be modified regarding the firm’s application for refund submitted in the Arco refund proceeding.

Feb. 9, 1996 ........... Nathaniel Hendricks, Putney, VT ............ VFA–0129 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

April 5, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Argonne Area Office would be rescinded, and

Nathaniel Hendricks would receive access to certain DOE

information.

Feb. 7, 1996 ........... Hellen Ruth Sutton-Pank, Flandreau, SD VFA–0130 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 2, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Albuquerque Operations Office would be rescinded, and Hellen Ruth Sutton-Pank would receive access to certain DOE information.