22082 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices

Brief Description of Disapproved

Projects: Air quality mitigation

compress natural gas (CNG) system.

Determination: Disapproved. Based

on information available to the FAA, the

FAA has determined that the CNG

fueling station is a part of the Air

Quality certificate to permit the

Sacramento Metropolitan Airport to

increase the number of terminal

vehicular parking spaces, not for the

1985 runway project, as presented by

the public agency in their Attachment B

for this project. In addition, the project

was not identified as a mitigation action

at the time the environmental finding

was approved for the runway project.

Therefore, this project must be

considered as a project to comply with

Clean Air Act mandates. Section 203 of

the Federal Aviation Administration

Authorization Act of 1994, Public Law

No. 103–305 (August 23, 1994) (49

U.S.C. 40017(a)(3)(F)), expanded PFC

eligibility to include Federal clean air

mandate projects imposed on an airport.

However, this same legislation limited

PFC eligibility to only airside, that is,

aircraft movement area, clean air act

mandate projects unless the project was

also included in an AIP grant. This

proposed project is not considered an

airside project and the proposed

financial plan shows only PFC funding.

Therefore, the project is not PFC

eligible. Airfield support shops and

facilities.

Determination: Disapproved. The

justification provided by the public

agency for this project in the

Attachment B indicates that these

facilities will support the airfield

operations and maintenance, buildings,

and equipment. In a March 13, 1996,

letter to the FAA, the public agency

clarifies that these facilities are not

intended to support ARFF or airfield

lighting requirements. The FAA has

determined that these facilities will

support maintenance and operations

functions at the airport. This project,

therefore, is not AIP eligible in

accordance with Appendix 2, item 11,

of FAA Order 5100.38A, AIP Handbook.

Therefore, this project does not meet the

requirements of § 158.15(b). Airfield

drainage control equipment—backhoe.

Determination: Disapproved. This

equipment is considered a maintenance

item and, as such, does not qualify as

eligible safety, security, or support

equipment as defined by paragraphs

562, 563, 565, and 566 of FAA Order

5100.38A, AIP Handbook. Therefore,

this project does not meet the

requirements of § 158.15(b). Airfield

sweeper.

Determination: Disapproved. This

equipment is intended for use at another

airport the public agency owns,

Sacramento Mather Airport, not

Sacramento Metropolitan Airport;

however, information provided to the

carriers during consultation as well as

the discussion of the project in the

airline consultation meeting makes no

mention that this sweeper is intended

for use at an airport other than the

airport where the PFC is being imposed.

Therefore, the FAA has determined that

the consultation for this project was not

adequate.

Decision Date: April 26, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph R. Rodriguez, San Francisco

Airports District Office, (415) 876–2805.

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No. city, state

Amendment

approved

date

Amended approved net

PFC revenue

Previous approved net

PFC revenue

Previous

estimated

charge exp.

date

Amended

estimated

charge exp.

date

94–01–C–01–FOD, Fort Dodge, IA. ............................................... 03/25/96 $150,622 $157,221 4/01/00 4/01/00

94–01–C–01–BOI, Boise, ID. ......................................................... 04/03/96 9,651,628 6,857,774 10/01/98 11/01/97

93–01–C–01–EUG, Eugene, OR. .................................................. 04/03/96 4,629,888 3,729,699 11/01/98 11/01/98

95–01–C–01–ABY, Albany, GA. ..................................................... 04/04/96 307,301 457,301 10/01/99 6/01/98

93–01–C–01–NGM, Agana, GU ..................................................... 4/29/96 258,408,107 258,408,107 7/01/21 7/01/21

Issued in Washington, D.C. on May 6,

1996.

Donna P. Taylor,

Manager, Passenger Facility Charge Branch.

[FR Doc. 96–11934 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Maritime Administration

[Docket No. M–015; OMB No: 2133–0024]

Information Collection Available for

Public Comments and

Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for

comments.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this

notice announces the Maritime

Administration’s (MARAD’s) intentions

to request extension of approval for

three years of a currently approved

information collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted

on or before July 12, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael P. Ferris, Director Office of

Costs and Rates, Maritime

Administration, MAR–560, Room 8117,

400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington,

D.C. 20590. Telephone 202–366–2324 or

fax 202–366–7901. Copies of this

collection can also be obtained from that

office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title of Collection: Subsidy Voucher -

Operating - Differential Subsidy (Bulk &

Liner Cargo Vessels).

Type of Request: Extension of

currently approved information

collection.

OMB Control Number: 2133–0024.

Form Number: MA–790, SF–1034 and

supporting schedules.

Expiration Date of Approval: June 30,

1996.

Summary of Collection of

Information: The information collected

is the costs and manning complement of

bulk and liner cargo vessels engaged in

carrying commodities in worldwide

services and covered by an OperatingDifferential Subsidy Agreeement (ODS)

in accordance with Title VI of the

Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended

(Act).

Need and Use of the Information: The

information is utilized by MARAD

examiners to determine subsidy payable

for voyages performed in accordance

with ODS agreements.

Description of Respondents: Bulk and

liner vessel operators of vessels covered

by an ODS agreement under the Act.

Annual Responses: 320.

Annual Burden: 640 hours.

Comments: Send all comments

regarding this information collection to

Joel C. Richard, Department of

Transportation, Maritime

Administration, MAR–120, Room 7210,

400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington,

D.C. 20590. Send comments regarding
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices 22083

whether this information collection is

necessary for proper performance of the

function of the agency and will have

practical utility, accuracy of the burden

estimates, ways to minimize this

burden, and ways to enhance quality,

utility, and clarity of the information to

be collected.

By Order of the Maritime Administrator.

Dated: May 8, 1996.

Joel C. Richard,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–11883 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–81–P