20200 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 88 / Monday, May 6, 1996 / Proposed Rules

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for this approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this document. Any parties interested in

commenting on this action should do so

at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by June 5,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Daniel A.

Meer, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3), Air

and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Copies of the rule revisions and EPA’s

evaluation report of each rule are

available for public inspection at EPA’s

Region 9 office during normal business

hours. Copies of the submitted rule

revisions are also available for

inspection at the following locations:

Rulemaking Section (A–5–3), Air and

Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105.

Environmental Protection Agency, Air

Docket (6102), 401 ‘‘M’’ Street SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20460.

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 92123–1095.

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District, 1999

Tuolumne Street, Suite #200, Fresno,

CA 93721.

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution

Control District, 26 Castilian Drive, B–

23, Goleta, CA 93117.

South Coast Air Quality Management

District, 21865 E. Copley Drive,

Diamond Bar, CA 91765–4182.

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95812.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen Liu, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3),

Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901, Telephone:

(415) 744–1199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

document concerns the following rules

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD)

Rule 4602—Motor Vehicle and Mobile

Equipment Coating Operations, Santa

Barbara County Air Pollution Control

District (SBCAPCD) Rule 325—Crude

Oil Production and Separation,

SBCAPCD Rule 326—Storage of

Reactive Organic Compound Liquids,

and South Coast Air Quality

Management District (SCAQMD) Rule

1124—Aerospace Assembly and

Component Manufacturing Operations.

California Air Resources Board

submitted the rules to EPA on the

following dates: October 13, 1995,

March 29, 1994, March 29, 1994, and

February 24, 1995, respectively. For

further information, please see the

information provided in the Direct Final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: April 18, 1996.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–11206 Filed 5–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–W

40 CFR Part 52

[OH93–1–7290b; FRL–5467–4]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Ohio

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the Particulate Matter contingency

measures State Implementation Plan

(SIP) revisions submitted by the State of

Ohio on July 17, 1995. This submittal

addresses the Federal Clean Air Act

requirement to submit contingency

measures for particulate matter with an

aerodynamic diameter less than or equal

to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM) for

the areas designated as nonattainment

for the PM National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS).

Contingency measures are emission

reductions which are to be

implemented, with no further action, in

the event that an area fails to meet air

quality standards. In the final rules

section of this Federal Register, the EPA

is approving this action as a direct final

rule without prior proposal because

EPA views this as a noncontroversial

action and anticipates no adverse

comments. A detailed rationale for the

approval is set forth in the direct final

rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to that direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on the proposed rule. EPA will

not institute a second comment period

on this action. Any parties interested in

commenting on this document should

do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received on or before June 5,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Copies of the State submittal and

EPA’s analysis of it are available for

inspection at: Regulation Development

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Pohlman, Regulation

Development Section, Air Programs

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604, (312) 886–3299.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule published in the rules section

of this Federal Register.

Dated: April 19, 1996.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–11201 Filed 5–03–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[UT18–1–6778b; FRL–5500–2]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans; Utah;

Emission Statement Regulation, Ozone

Nonattainment Area Designation,

Definitions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing approval of

the revision to the Utah State

Implementation Plan (SIP) that was

submitted by the Governor of Utah on

November 12, 1993, for the purpose of

implementing an emission statement

program for stationary sources within

the Salt Lake and Davis Counties (SLDC)

ozone nonattainment area. The emission

statement inventory regulation, Utah Air
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 88 / Monday, May 6, 1996 / Proposed Rules 20201

Conservation Regulation (UACR) R307–

1–3.5.4., was submitted by the State to

satisfy the Clean Air Act (CAA), as

amended in 1990, requirements for an

emission statement program to be part

of the SIP for Utah. EPA’s approval will

serve to make the emission statement

inventory regulation federally

enforceable. In addition, EPA is

proposing to approve other minor

changes involving definitions in UACR

R307–1–1. and the ozone nonattainment

area designation definition in UACR

R307–1–3.3.3.

In the Rules Section of this Federal

Register, EPA is approving the State’s

SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision and anticipates no adverse

comments. A detailed rationale for the

approval is set forth in the direct final

rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a

second comment period on this action.

Any parties interested in commenting

on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by June 5,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be addressed to: Richard R. Long,

Director, Air Program (8P2–A), United

States Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite

500, Denver, Colorado 80202–2466.

Copies of the documents relevant to

this action are available for public

inspection between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,

Monday through Friday at the following

office: United States Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 8, Air

Program, 999 18th Street, Suite 500,

Denver, Colorado 80202–2466.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim

Russ, Air Program (8P2–A), United

States Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite

500, Denver, Colorado 80202–2466,

Telephone number: (303) 312–6479.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the

information provided in the direct final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Dated: September 29, 1995.

Jack W. McGraw,

Acting Regional Administrator.

Editorial note: This document was

received at the Office of the Federal Register

May 1, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96–11199 Filed 5–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 140–10–7261b; FRL–5457–1]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision, Placer

County Air Pollution Control District

and Ventura County Air Pollution

Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed Rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP), which

concern the control of volatile organic

compound (VOC) emissions from the

storage and transfer of organic liquids

and tank degassing operations.

The intended effect of proposing

approval of these rules is to regulate

emissions of VOCs in accordance with

the requirements of the Clean Air Act,

as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

In the Final Rules Section of this

Federal Register, the EPA is approving

the state’s SIP revisions as a direct final

rule without prior proposal because the

Agency views these as noncontroversial

revision amendments and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for this approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to these rules. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this document. Any parties interested in

commenting on this action should do so

at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by June 5,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Daniel A.

Meer, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3), Air

and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Copies of the rules and EPA’s

evaluation reports of the rules are

available for public inspection at EPA’s

Region 9 office during normal business

hours. Copies of the submitted rules are

also available for inspection at the

following locations:

California Air Resources Board, Stationary

Source Division, Rule Evaluation Section,

2020 ‘‘L’’ Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Placer County Air Pollution Control District,

11464 B Avenue, Auburn, CA 95603.

Ventura County Air Pollution Control

District, Rule Development Section, 669

County Square Drive, Ventura, CA 93003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Duane F. James, Rulemaking Section

(A–5–3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901, Telephone:

(415) 744–1191, email:

james.duane@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

document concerns the Placer County

Air Pollution Control District’s Rule

212, ‘‘Storage of Organic Liquids,’’ and

Rule 215, ‘‘Transfer of Gasoline into

Tank Trucks, Trailers and Railroad Tank

Cars at Loading Facilities,’’ and the

Ventura County Air Pollution Control

District’s Rule 74.26, ‘‘Crude Oil Storage

Tank Degassing Operations,’’ and Rule

74.27, ‘‘Gasoline and ROC Liquid

Storage Tank Degassing Operations.’’

These rules were submitted to EPA on

January 24, 1995 (Rules 215, 74.26, and

74.27) and October 13, 1995 (Rule 212),

by the California Air Resources Board.

For further information, please see the

information provided in the Direct Final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: March 11, 1996.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–11195 Filed 5–03–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–W

40 CFR Part 52

[IL129–1–7046b; FRL–5464–9]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The United States

Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) proposes to approve a State

revision to the Illinois sulfur dioxide

State Implementation Plan (SO2 SIP),

submitted on March 14, 1995. This

revision revises the SO2 emission

limitations applicable to Madison