alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAXWELL HOFFMAN, 

No. 02-99004 Petitioner-Appellant,

D.C. No.

v. CV-94-00200-SARVON J. ARAVE, Warden, Idaho  BLW

Maximum Security Institution, District of Idaho,

Department of Correction, State of Boise

Idaho, ORDER Respondent-Appellee. 

Filed March 3, 2008

Before: Harry Pregerson, William A. Fletcher, and

Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The order filed on February 14, 2008, is hereby designated

for publication. 

1907
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2008 Thomson/West.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**The SCO Group, Inc. Listingof Subsidiaries**

 
| **Subsidiary**                    | ** ** | **Location**   | ** ** | **Ownership Interest** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|------------------------|
|                              |       |           |       |                   |
| SCO Operations, Inc.         |       | United States  |       | Wholly owned           |
| SCO Global, Inc.             |       | United States  |       | Wholly owned           |
| SCO Software (UK) Ltd.            |       | United Kingdom |       | Wholly owned           |
| SCO Japan, Ltd.                   |       | Japan          |       | Wholly owned           |
| SCO Canada, Inc.             |       | Canada         |       | Wholly owned           |
| The SCO Group (Deutschland) GmbH  |       | Germany        |       | Wholly owned           |
| The SCO Group (France) Sarl       |       | France         |       | Wholly owned           |
| SCO Software (India) Private Ltd. |       | India          |       | Wholly owned           |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 13, 2022

No. 04-22-00492-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.M., J.W.M., V.S.M., N.J.M., L.V.M., L.D.M., AND D.A.M.

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-01074

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating Appellant’s parental rights, 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed an Anders brief. In the brief, counsel states that after 

a professional evaluation of the record, counsel finds no reversible error, concludes the appeal is 

without merit and frivolous, and counsel attached a motion to withdraw. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at 

*4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in a parental 

rights termination appeal).

Counsel informed Appellant of his right to file a pro se brief and to request a free copy of 

the appellate record. Counsel provided Appellant with a form request for a free copy of the 

appellate record, and the form lacks only Appellant’s contact information, date, and signature.

The State a letter waiving its right to file a responsive brief unless Appellant files a pro se 

brief.

If Appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we order Appellant to do so within twenty 

days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

If Appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than twenty 

days after Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).

The motion to withdraw is held in abeyance pending further order of this court.

FILE COPY
It is so ORDERED on October 13, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
Exhibit 10.13

LOGO

November 29th, 2010

TRX, Inc.

2970 Clairmont Road, Suite 300

Atlanta, GA 30329,

Attn: David D. Cathcart

Re: Statement of Work No. 3 - Extension of Basic Term

Dear Mr. Cathcart:

TRX, Inc. (TRX) and American Express Travel Related Services, Inc (Amex)
entered into a Statement of Work No. 3 (SOW) for Queue Manager Services with an effective date of January 1, 2010.

Amex is
requesting that the Term of this SOW, be extended until April 30, 2011, for the purpose of allowing additional time to come to an agreement on an amendment of the SOW to revise certain existing terms.

The parties agree that all other terms and conditions set forth in the SOW shall remain in effect and unchanged.

Please acknowledge your agreement with the above by signing below and returning one originally signed copy of this letter back to me via a pdf copy to my
e-mail, or via hard copy to the address provided below.

We look forward to working with TRX to complete this extension in a timely manner and
to our continued positive and productive relationship.

Best regards,

/s/ John Fredell

John Fredell

Global Real Estate and Procurement Services

American Express

Ameriprise Financial Center

OP2N/1987

Minneapolis, MN 55478

LOGO



---

LOGO



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|ACKNOWLEDGEMENT                                            
|                                                           
|Acknowledged and agreed to this 29th day of November, 2010.
|                                                           
|/s/ David D. Cathcart                                      
|                                                           
|David D. Cathcart                                          
|Printed Name                                               
|                                                           
|CFO                                                        
|Title                                                      

LOGO
#### David ACOSTA, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41310.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 15, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 3, 1989.

Jim Lynn, Columbia, for movant-appel-lant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Debra M. Miles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J. and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to a Rule 24.035 motion.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly Report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: May 12, 2010 /s/Frank Pioppi     Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly reports of Propex Fabrics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Donald G. Mercer                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 15, 2005                      
|                                     
|/s/ Philip D. Barnes                 
|Chief Financial Officer              
|August 15, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Q Comm International, Inc (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul C. Hickey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Paul C. Hickey
-------------------------------
Paul C. Hickey,
Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2003
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5823 

To provide for continued operation of the Coast Guard in the event of 

a lapse in appropriation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 

Mr. VAN DREW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To provide for continued operation of the Coast Guard in 

the event of a lapse in appropriation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUED OPERATION OF COAST GUARD. 

4 In the case of a lapse in appropriations for the Coast 

5 Guard, there are appropriated such amounts as may be 

6 necessary for the operation of the Coast Guard for the 

7 lesser of— 

8 (1) 30 days; or 

9 (2) the duration of the lapse in appropriation. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the date, time and agenda for a meeting of the National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board. The meeting will be open to the public; however, advance notice of attendance is required.

# DATES:

Wednesday, July 28, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. EDT.

# ADDRESSES:

Meeting will be held via Microsoft Teams.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rachel Karton, Office of Small Business Development Centers, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416;                         *Rachel.newman-karton@sba.gov;*                         202-619-1816.                    

If anyone wishes to be a listening participant or would like to request accommodations, please contact Rachel Karton at the information above.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the SBA announces the meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator for Small Business Development Centers.

## Purpose

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the following issues pertaining to the SBDC Program:
    - Cybersecurity
    - Outreach to underserved communities
    - Strategies for getting Small Business back to normal

Andrienne Johnson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-12222 Filed 6-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Lowell E. HOTTMAN, C.L.U., Appellant, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. WD 41095.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 25, 1989.

Steward M. Stein and Sonya S. Stokes of Buck, Bohm & Stein, P.C., Kansas City, for appellant.

Gardiner B. Davis of Spencer Fane Britt & Browne, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Hottman appeals from the entry of summary judgment against him on Counts I (breach of contract) and III (respondeat superior) of his petition, and the entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Count II (unjust enrichment).

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
302 CERTIFICATION

I, Marc E. Combs, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peer
Review Mediation and Arbitration, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and  procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2010             /s/Marc E. Combs
                               ----------------------------
                               Marc E. Combs, Chief Financial Officer
exv10wxcy



 





Exhibit 10(c)




Amendment to PartnerShares Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”)



Effective August 4, 2006, to reflect the two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock
dividend on the Company’s common stock distributed August 11, 2006, to holders of record on August
4, 2006, the first sentence of Section 3.1 of the Plan was amended to read:





“An aggregate of 108,000,000 Shares (as adjusted to reflect the October 10, 1997 and August
11, 2006 two-for-one stock splits) are available for Awards and as a basis for calculating
Awards under the Plan.”
FILED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT APRI L 26 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH N CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HEEL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 05- 1411 5
D. C. Docket N o. 03-03788 CV -MH S-1 ROLAND I. OJEGBA, Pl ai nti ff -A ppe lla nt,
ve rs us TIM MUR PHY, KIM COLE, etal., D ef en da nts -A ppe lle es .
Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the N or the rn D istri ct

of G eo rg ia (A pr il 26, 200 6)
Be fo re D U BI N A , MA RC U S an d P RY O R, Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:Guilty plea accompa nied by an asse rtion of innocenc e. Se e Nor th C aroli na v . A lfo rd , 400 1 U.S. 25, 37 (1970). See Blohm v. Commissioner , 994 F.2d 1542, 1555 ( 11th Cir. 1993). 2 2 T his is a 42 U
. S. C. § 19 83 e xc es siv e fo rc e cl ai m a ri sin g f ro m the tr af fi c sto p of pla int if f Ro la nd I
. O

j eg baby S er ge an t T im

Mu rp hy of

the K en ne sa w S ta te U niv er sit y P oli ce D ep artm en t. O j eg baa lle ge s th at

se ve ra l of

fi ce rs , inc lud ing Se rg ea nt M urphy , pe ppe r spr ay ed , be at , a nd c hoke d hi m w hil e ef fe ctua tin g hi s
ar re st. H e fu rthe r as se rt s r ac ia l di sc ri mina tio n c la im s, a lle gin g po lic e hara ssm en t
an d in tim ida tio n. T he dis tr ic t c our t gr an te d su mm ary j udgmen t t o th e of fi ce rs on qua lif ie d im m uni ty gr ound s f

or the e xc es siv e fo rc e cl ai m , a nd s umm ary j udgmen t on t he r ac ia l di sc ri mina tio n c la im f or la ck of e vid en ce . O

j eg bam ak es no
a r g u me n to n a p p e a l a s t o t h e r a c i a l d i s c r i mi n a t i o n c l a i m. A ft er r ev ie w ing the r ec or d, r ea din g th e part ie s’ br ie fs a nd h av ing the be ne fi t of or al a rg um en t, w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c our t’ s gr an t of sum m ary j udgmen t up until the tim e O

j egba wa s subd ued by the officer s under He ck v. Hum phrey , 512 U. S. 477, 486 n.6 (1994 ) (c ourts sho uld rej ect allegations in a civil suit that
co ntr ad ic t pl ai nti ff ’ s pl ea of gui lty to cr imina l c harg es ). T he f ac t t ha t i n th is c as e the ple a w as a n A lfo rd plea is of no consequence. 1 2 Concerning Oj egba’ s claim of excessive forc e, the rec ord does no t supp ort it. B ec au se w e co nc lud e fr om the r ec or d th at

no e xc es siv e fo rc e w as use d, O j eg ba3

fai ls to pro ve a co ns ti tu ti on al vi ol at io n o ccu rred
. See G raha m v . Co nnor , 490 U. S. 386 (198 9). For the above-stated re asons, we aff irm the district court’ s grant of summ ary j udgmen t. AFFIRMED.
1 CAUSE NO. 03-15-00428-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

B ERNARD M ORELLO , Appellant ,

v.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS , Appellee

.

On Appeal from Cause No. D-1-GV-06-000627 353rd judicial District Court, Austin, Texas The Honorable Rhonda Hurley

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF CO-COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.2, the Court and counsel are

hereby notified that the fo llowing counsel is designated as co-counsel for Appellant

Bernard Morello:

James M. Juranek State Bar No. 24026888 111 N. Ennis Houston, TX 77003 713.229.0699 (Phone) 888.626.6596 (Facsimile) james@jjfirm.com ACCEPTED 03-15-00428-CV 6505644 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/14/2015 2:31:08 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 Respectfully submitted,

L APEZE & J OHNS , P.L.L.C.

By:___________________________ Keith W. Lapeze Texas Bar No. 24010176 Taylor L. Shipman Texas Bar No. 24079323 601 Sawyer Street, Suite 650 Houston, Texas 77007 Tel. (713) 739-1010 Fax. (713) 739-1015 keith@lapezejohns.com taylor@lapezejohns.com

JURANEK LAW FIRM, PLLC

_ _____________________ By: JAMES JURANEK State Bar No. 24026888 111 N. Ennis Houston, Texas 77003 (713) 229-0699 (888) 626-6596 (fax) james@jjfirm.com Counsel for Appellant

C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing motion wa s served on the following counsel for

Appellee State of Texas via e-filing on August 14, 2014:

Craig J. Pritzlaff Assistant Attorney General P.O. Box 12548, MC-066, Austin, TX 78711 512.320.0911 (Fax)

____

____________ __________ James Juranek