alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11682]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-397-000]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Application

May 6, 1996.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1996, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans), 3500 
Park Lane, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15275, filed in Docket No. CP96-
397-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act 
for permission and approval to abandon an exchange service with 
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia), all as more fully set 
forth in the application on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Equitrans proposes to abandon an exchange service with Columbia 
under its Rate Schedule X-99 which provided for the exchange in Upshur 
and Wetzel Counties, West Virginia.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before May 28, 1996, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, 
a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements 
of the Commission's rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for Equitrans to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11682 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11395]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 96-047]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Solar System Exploration Advisory Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science 
Advisory Committee, Solar System Exploration Advisory Subcommittee.

DATES: Thursday, June 6, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Friday, June 7, 
1996, 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, MIC Room 
5H46, 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jurgen Rahe, Code SA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-2150.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--Office of Space Science Activities
--Board of Directors Overview
--Research Program Management Overview
--Advanced Technology and Mission Studies Overview
--Mission and Payload Development, Overview
--Roadmap to the Solar System
--Future Activities

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: May 1, 1996.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-11395 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
#### In re the Body of Diana K. KELLEY.

No. 18965.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

June 23, 1994.

*510Robert W. Richart, Joplin, for respondent-appellant.

David Dally, Pros. Atty., Dean G. Dankel-son, Asst. Pros. Atty., Jasper County, Terrence D. Prigmore, Joplin, for petitioner-respondent.

PREWITT, Judge.

At the request of Paul Stubblefield, the father of Diana K. Kelley, the prosecuting attorney of Jasper County filed a “petition to exhume body and conduct autopsy5’. The exhumation and autopsy were opposed by Doyle Kelley, Diana K. Kelley’s surviving husband. They were “separated” at the time of her death.

On July 9, 1993, following nonjury trial, the court authorized Stubblefield to have the body exhumed and an autopsy performed. Doyle Kelley appeals from that order. On August 25, 1993, the body was exhumed and Dr. Jill M. Gould performed the autopsy.

Notwithstanding that the relief sought has occurred, appellant contends that this court should reverse the judgment because “the evidence gained from the exhumation and subsequent autopsy is fruit of the poisonous tree. The relief sought for by Appellant would render said evidence inadmissible in promised subsequent investigation and charges against Appellant.”

Appellant’s contention in response to whether his appeal is moot is answered in *Kracman v. Ozark Elec. Co-op., Inc.,*816 S.W.2d 688, 690 (Mo.App.1991):

> “The existence of an actual and vital controversy susceptible of some relief is essential to appellate jurisdiction.” *Duffe v. Zych,*676 S.W.2d 70, 72 (Mo.App.1984). When a question presented for decision could not have any practical effect upon any then existing controversy, the question is moot. *Id.*The controversy is no less moot because the issue may come into play at some future time. *Id.*

The appeal is dismissed as moot.

CROW and GARRISON, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 15

- 00354

- CV

EX PARTE M.N.F.

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 06163

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 5, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

The appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 08- 55013 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ROBE RT J . J AFFE , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. D A V I D P . Y A F F E , T h e H o n o r ab le , in h is Ju d ic ia l a n din d iv id u a l c ap a c itie s ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 55013 D. C. No . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 8 0 9 4 - DD P- J TL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D e a n D . P r e ge r s on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R o b er t J. Jaf

fe ap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s o rd erre jectin g Ja ff

e’s F e de r a l R ul e of

C i vi l P r oc e dur e 60( b) m ot i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 

# FI LED JU N 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 55013

U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de c i s i on re gardi ng the m anagem entof i t s c as e. Muc kles hoot T r i be v . L um m iI

ndi an T r i be , 1 4 1 F. 3 d1 3 5 5 , 1 3 5 8 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 8 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byr e j e c t i ng J a f

f e ’ s R ul e 60( b) m o tio n . T h e r e

je c tio n w a s c o n s is te n t w ith th is c o u rt’s m a n d a te u p o n s u m m a r ily af fi rm i ng the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderdi sm i ss i ng Ja ff e’ s s ui tfor l ac k o f s ubj ec tm att er j uri sdi ct i on un der the R ooke r - Fe ldm an d o c tr in e . Se e P alom o v . B aba , 497 F . 2d 95 9, 96 0 (9th C i r. 19 74 ) ( per c uri am ) ( re cogn i zi ng thatany order s by adi stri ct courtfol l ow i ng i ss uance of the m andat e m ustbe consi st ent“ as t o al l m att er s encom pass ed by the m andat e” ). W e dec l i ne t o add re ss Ja ff e’ s c on t ent i on s r egar di ng the un derl yi ng di sm i ss al of hi s c as e. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 4.12.6 072106 ltr amend.


Exhbit 4.12.6




July 21, 2006




The Connecticut Light and Power Company

107 Selden Street

Berlin, Connecticut 06037




Ladies and Gentlemen:




We refer to the Receivables Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of September 30, 1997, as amended and restated as of March 30, 2001, as amended, among CL & P Receivables Corporation (the "Seller"), CAFCO, LLC, Citibank, N.A., Citicorp North America, Inc., as agent for the Purchasers and the Banks (the "Agent") and The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the "Originator") (the "Agreement"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.




The Seller has advised the Agent that Lake Road Generating Company, L.P. ("Lake Road") and Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. ("Dominion") have failed and continue to fail to make payment on account of Receivables for which each is the Obligor (respectively, "Lake Road Receivables," and "Dominion Receivables"). The Seller acknowledges that Lake Road Receivables and Dominion Receivables are not Eligible Receivables. Therefore, until further notice by the Agent to the Seller, Lake Road Receivables and Dominion Receivables (i) shall not be considered to be Eligible Receivables and (ii) shall not be utilized for calculating the Delinquency Ratio, the Default Ratio or the Loss-to-Liquidation Ratio.




This letter may be executed in any number of counterparts and by any combination of the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which counterparts shall be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same letter.




If you agree to the terms and provisions hereof, please evidence your agreement by executing and returning at least one counterpart of this letter, whereupon it will constitute your agreement to the foregoing.








		
	 	Very truly yours,


	 	 
	 	CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.


	 	As Agent


	 	 
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Derek L. Riddick


	 	      Name:  Derek L. Riddick


	 	      Title:  Vice President







Agreed as of the date first above written




The Connecticut Light and Power Company







By: /s/ Patricia C. Cosgel

       Name: PATRICIA C. COSGEL

       Title: ASSISTANT TREASURER –

                           FINANCE







CL&P Receivables Corporation







       Name: PATRICIA C. COSGEL

       Title: ASSISTANT TREASURER –

                           FINANCE
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of W. S.  INDUSTRIES,  INC. (the
"COMPANY")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  May 31,  2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  I, James
F. Dempsey, President and Chief Executive Officer, respectively, of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 10, 2009


                                  By: /s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
                                     _____________________________
                                          James F. Dempsey
                                          Chief Financial Officer
#### Richard Ray GILBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48640.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 22, 1994.

Laura G. Martin, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Steven J. Sarbacker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for postconvietion relief after an evidentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0609
ARIANE WITTMAN and JEREMY TAYLEN,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v. CITY OF BILLINGS,

Defendant and Appellee. 

# FILED JUL 2 8 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State ,f Montana ORDER

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for oral argument before the Court sitting en banc and is hereby set for argument on Friday, September 10, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. at the Holiday Inn Missoula Downtown in Missoula, Montana, with an introduction to the argument beginning at 9:00 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to M.R. App. P. 17(3), oral argument times in this cause number shall be forty (40) minutes for the Appellants and thirty (30 minutes for the Appellee. Counsel should be mindful ofthe provisions ofM.R.App.P. 17(6). The Court will not entertain any motions to reschedule. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereofto all counsel ofrecord,to Dean Paul Kirgis, Alexander Blewett III School of Law, University of Montana, to John Mudd, Executive Director,State Bar ofMontana,and to the Honorable Michael G.Moses,District Judge. DATED this 2 day ofJuly, 2021. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 07/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0609
#### QUAIL HARBOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Fred GONZALES, d/b/a Alamo Contractors Company.

No. D-2686.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 14, 1992.

ORDER

Joint motion to dismiss application for writ of error, together with joint first amended agreed motion to remand to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals with instructions to remand to trial court for new trial, are granted.

The application for writ of error is granted. The judgments of the courts below are vacated without reference to the merits of the appeal, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for consolidation with other pending suits and entry of settlement after consolidation from Harris County; 14th district (B14-91-00581-CV, 1992 WL 56836, 03-26-92).
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), we, Kim Boyce, our Chief Executive Officer and director and Keith L. Merrell, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in our Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and result of operations.

Dated: 4/2/2010                                /s/Kim Boyce

                                                           Kim Boyce

                                                           Chief Executive Officer and Director

Dated: 4/2/2010                               /s/Keith L. Merrell

                                                          Keith L. Merrell

                                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. WATTS, Appellant.

No. WD 49064.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 25, 1995.

Jackie L. Bailey, Marceline, for appellant.

James Bradley Funk, Asst. Pros. Atty., Macon County, Macon, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and SMART and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from conviction of driving while intoxicated, § 577.010, RSMo 1994.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 24481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12161]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


AmeriCorps*VISTA Pre-Application Inquiry Form Reinstatement

AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service has asked 
for an emergency processing request to OMB for the AmeriCorps*VISTA 
Pre-Application Inquiry.

DATES: The effective date is May 20, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diana B. London, Deputy Director, AmeriCorps*VISTA, (202) 606-5000, 
extension 228. For individuals with disabilities, information will be 
made available in alternative formats, upon request.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A request for emergency processing for 
reinstatement of OMB Approval #3001-0057, AmeriCorps*VISTA Pre-
Application Inquiry form which expired on November 30, 1995, has been 
requested to OMB. This form is used for information collection on 
potential AmeriCorps*VISTA applicant organizations to determine their 
eligibility to become an AmeriCorps*VISTA sponsoring organization.

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
Diana B. London,
Deputy Director, AmeriCorps*VISTA.
[FR Doc. 96-12161 Filed 5-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-M
EX-10.12



 





Exhibit 10.12




February 3, 2006




GSC Capital Corp.

500 Campus Drive

Suite 220

Florham Park, NJ 07932




Dear Sirs and Mesdames:




     We refer to the management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) between you and us dated as
of July 11, 2005. This letter confirms our understanding of the new fee arrangement regarding
investments made by you in collateralized debt obligations managed by us (“GSCP CDOs”).



     With respect to investments made directly or indirectly by you in GSCP CDOs:




	 	(a)	 	while you directly or indirectly hold 100% of the
equity or equity equivalent of any GSCP CDO, if the
total aggregate fees payable on an annual basis by
the GSCP CDO(s) to us in respect of the management of
the CDO(s) (the “CDO Management Fees”) are equal to
or less than the total aggregate fees payable on an
annual basis by you to us in respect of the
management of you (the “REIT Management Fee”)
calculated in accordance with the Management
Agreement, the REIT Management Fee will be reduced on
a dollar-for-dollar basis by the amount of the fees
paid by such GSCP CDO to us (without regard to the
amount of your investment in such CDOs); provided,
however, that the REIT Management Fee payable by you,
after giving effect to any reductions, shall never
exceed the amounts specified to be paid by you in the
Management Agreement;
	 
	 	(b)	 	in the event that you hold less than 100% of the
equity or equity equivalent of any GSCP CDO, the REIT
Management Fee will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar
basis by an amount equal to the reduction set forth
in (a), after giving effect to a pro-rata decrease in
the amount available for such reduction in respect of
any portion of the equity or equity equivalent of
such GSCP CDO not directly or indirectly held by you;
	 
	 	(c)	 	if the CDO Management Fees exceed the total REIT
Management Fees calculated in accordance with the
Management Agreement,





 









 





	 	 	 	there shall be no further reduction due to you and we will be entitled to retain
the CDO Management Fees in excess of the REIT Management Fees; and
	 
	 	(d)	 	in connection with the payment of the REIT Management
Fees and the CDO Management Fees, we will provide
quarterly reconciliations which set forth in
reasonable detail the calculations of the various CDO
Management Fees and the reductions due to you and any
payment of CDO Management Fees to us.





     We reserve the right to change the foregoing fee arrangement at any time and adopt a new fee
arrangement so long as any new fee arrangement complies with the minimum requirements of the
Management Agreement.



Very truly yours,




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	GSCP (NJ), L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	GSCP (NJ), Inc.,
its general partner	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David L. Goret
 

	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name: David L. Goret	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Managing Director and Secretary	 	 





Acknowledged and Agreed:



GSC CAPITAL CORP.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ April M. Spencer	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	April M. Spencer	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer	 	 






2
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0221 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY WAYNE TEMPLE, JR. ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of ti me, and good cause appearing therefore , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 10 , 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2022

08/02/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0221