alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 D0 12 6 . J AFFTON B. RI CHARDSON v . THE STATE.

In May 2 0 1 6

, J afft o n B. Ri ch ard s o n pl ed gu i l t y t o sh o pl i ft in g an d fo rg ery

. He

l a t e r f i l ed a m o t i o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

, w h i ch t h e t ri al co u rt d en i e d

.

Ri ch ard so n t h en fi l ed t h i s t i m el y ap pl i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

.

T h e d en i al o f a m o ti o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p e a l i s d i r e c t l y a p p e a l a b l e

.

Lu n s fo r d v

. S t at e

, 2 3 7 Ga. Ap p. 6 9 6

, 6 9 6 (5 1 5 SE2 d 19 8 ) (1 99 9 ); s ee al s o

W et h er in g t o n v. S t a t e

, 29 6 Ga. 45 1 (7 6 9 SE2 d 5 3 ) (2 0 1 5 ) (ad d res si ng m eri t s o f d i rect

ap p eal fro m d en i al o f m ot i o n fo r o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal fo l l o w i ng g u i l t y p l ea).

Acco rd in g ly

, t h i s ap p l icat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap peal i s h ereb y GRANTED p u rs u an t

t o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (j). Ri ch ard s o n s h al l h av e t en day s fro m t h e d at e of t h i s o rd er to

fi le h i s n o t i ce o f ap peal i n t he t ri al co u rt

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (g ). Th e cl erk o f t h e t ri al

co u rt i s d i rect ed t o i n cl u de a co p y o f t h i s o rd er i n t h e reco rd t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt

o f Ap peal s

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/17/2016 October 17, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11646]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Proposed Posting of Stockyard

    The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, United 
States Department of Agriculture, has information that the livestock 
market named below is a stockyard as defined in Section 302 of the 
Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. 202), and should be made subject 
to the provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended 
(7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.).

OH-151--Producers Livestock Association, Gallipolis, Ohio

    Pursuant to the authority under Section 302 of the Packers and 
Stockyards Act, notice is hereby given that it is proposed to designate 
the stockyard named above as a posted stockyard subject to the 
provisions of said Act.
    Any person who wishes to submit written data, views or arguments 
concerning the proposed designation may do so by filing them with the 
Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Grain Inspection, Packers and 
Stockyards Administration, Room 3408-South Building, U. S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250 by May 21, 1996.
    All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made 
available for public inspection in the office of the Director of the 
Livestock Marketing Division during normal business hours.

    Done at Washington, D.C. this 6th day of May 1996.
Daniel L. Van Ackeren,
Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Packers and Stockyards 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 96-11646 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-521 and 731-TA-1252-1255 and 1257 (Review)]


Steel Nails From Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on steel nails 
from Vietnam and the antidumping duty orders on steel nails from Korea, 
Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2020 (85 FR 
33195) and determined on September 4, 2020 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (86 FR 26545, May 14, 2021).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on May 28, 2021. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5200 (May 2021), entitled 
Steel Nails from Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-521 and 731-TA-1252-1255 and 1257 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 28, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-11703 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-11096

L&C CONSULTANTS,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ASH PETROLEUM; JAMES W. PEAK; GENE H. IRWIN,

Defendants-Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CV-1904

Before WIENER, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 10, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-11096 Document: 00511317925 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2010
Order issued i)ecember 5, 2012

in i’he 

## nurt 

## nfppia1 fift1! 

## iitrict Ut at 

## Ja11wi No. 05-12-01601-CV
IN RE HOLLINGSWORTII SAND & GRAVEL, LLC, Relator original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County. Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-05735-E 

### ORDER Before Justices Bridges. Lang, and Fillmore Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, we DENYrelator’s petition forwritofmandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs ofthis original proceeding.

/4 / 4’ 

## ( / DOUGLA S. LANG JUSTIC’
EXHIBIT 31

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     I, Nicole Funk, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Aerobic Creations
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

   a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Aerobic Creations Inc., including its
subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of
our board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

  a) that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our a
bility to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have further advised our auditors that there we are not aware of
any material weaknesses in our internal controls; and

  b) that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
our management or other employees who have a significant role in
our internal controls.

                               1
<PAGE>


6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report that there were no significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation.


                            AEROBIC CREATIONS INC., Registrant

Dated: May 16, 2005         /s/ Nicole Funk
                            ---------------------------------------
                            By: Nicole Funk, President, Chief
                                Executive Officer, Treasurer,
                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                Principal Accounting Officer and
                                Director


















                                 2
<PAGE>
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Vannessa Ventures Ltd. for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  October 11, 2007





/s/ Cameron B. Boyer

Cameron B. Boyer

Controller

(Principal Financial Officer)







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F. William Capp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ F. William Capp

F. William Capp

Chief Executive Officer

 

March 29, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 88 (Monday, May 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20287-20288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11160]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LITERACY


Advisory Board; Meeting

AGENCY: National Institute for Literacy Advisory Board, National 
Institute for Literacy.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National

[[Page 20288]]

Institute for Literacy Advisory Board (Board). This notice also 
describes the function of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required 
under Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This 
document is intended to notify the general public of their opportunity 
to attend the meeting.

DATE AND TIME: May 29, 1996, 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Institute for Literacy, 800 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Staley, Deputy Director, National Institute for Literacy, 800 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone 
(202) 632-1526.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board is established under Section 384 
of the Adult Education Act, as amended by Title I of Public Law 102-73, 
the National Literacy Act of 1991. The Board consists of ten 
individuals appointed by the President with the advice and consent of 
the Senate. The Board is established to advise and make recommendations 
to the Interagency Group, composed of the Secretaries of Education, 
Labor, and Health and Human Services, which administers the National 
Institute for Literacy (Institute). The Interagency Group considers the 
Board's recommendations in planning the goals of the Institute and in 
the implementation of any programs to achieve the goals of the 
Institute. Specifically, the Board performs the following functions: 
(a) makes recommendations concerning the appointment of the Director 
and the staff of the Institute; (b) provides independent advice on 
operation of the Institute; and (c) receives reports from the 
Interagency Group and Director of the Institute. In addition, the 
Institute consults with the Board on the award of fellowships. The 
Board will meet in Washington, DC on May 29, 1996 from 9:30 a.m. to 
4:00 p.m. The meeting of the Board is open to the public. The agenda 
includes discussion of the Institute's strategic planning process and 
the 1996-97 spending plan. Records are kept of all Board proceedings 
and are available for public inspection at the National Institute for 
Literacy, 800 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006 
from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

    Dated: March 30, 1996.
Andrew J. Hartman,
Executive Director, National Institute for Literacy.
[FR Doc. 96-11160 Filed 5-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6055-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-100657, 333-104585 and 333-105658 of U.S.I.Holdings Corporation on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-112747 of U.S.I. Holdings Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated March 4, 2004, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S.I. Holdings for the year ended December31, 2003. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

New York, New York 

March 11, 2004
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11

- 633 V

Filed: December 29, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

ROSS BERGSTEDT

, *

*

Petitioner

, *

* Attorneys’ f ees and c osts d ecision ;

v. * an amount to which respondent does

* not object

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Jay A. Bansal

, Tempe, AZ , for petitioner.

J ulia W. McInerny , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Petitioner submitted his request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During

informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain a spects of petitioner’ s app lication

. Based on these objections, petitioner amend s his application for attor ne y s’ fees and costs to

$ 83,600 .00

. On December 23, 2014, respondent ’ s counsel emailed the undersigned ’ s law clerk,

reciting these events and stating that r espondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned

finds this amount to be reasonable. I n accordance with General Order #9 , petitioner ’ s counsel

assert s that petitioner did not incur any costs in pursuit of his petition.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master's action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims's website, in accordance with the E

- Go vernment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat.

2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be

made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial informati on that

is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a

clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify

and move to redact such information pr ior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon

review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special

master shall redact such material from public access.2

Accordingly, the court awards $ 83,600 .00

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’

fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a chec k payable jointly to petitioner and Law

Offices of Jay A. Bansal for $ 83,600 .00

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of

the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 29, 2014 /s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), e ntry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-21045

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

GUSTAVO CARBAJAL, also known as Gustavo Carbajal Gomez

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-390-5

--------------------

November 3, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gustavo Carbajal appeals the sentence imposed by the

district court following his jury trial conviction for conspiracy

to transport and harbor undocumented aliens. We review the

district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de

novo, and we review its factual findings for clear error. United

States v. Edwards, 65 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir. 1995).

 Carbajal argues that the district court clearly erred in

increasing his base offense level by nine points based on its
No. 99-21045

-2-

factual finding that Carbajal was accountable for smuggling,

transporting, or harboring more than 100 aliens. See U.S.S.G. 

§ 2L1.1(b)(2)(C). Because this finding is plausible in light of

the record read as a whole, the district court did not commit any

error, clear or otherwise. United States v. Watson, 966 F.2d

161, 162 (5th Cir. 1992).

The judgment of the district court imposing sentence is

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19779-19780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9715]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.43(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 23, 1995, Stepan 
Company, Natural Products Department, 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, 
New Jersey 07607, made application to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041)................................................  II      
Benzoylecgonine (9180)........................................  II      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firms plans to manufacture bulk Cocaine for distribution to its 
customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application and may also file a written 
request for a hearing thereon in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.54 and in 
the form prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections, or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of 
Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register 
Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than May 22, 1995.

    [[Page 19780]] Dated: April 7, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-9715 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of China Marketing Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Li Ying Sheng, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Li Ying Sheng

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 18, 2005