alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed August 27, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00369
- CV
SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBE DA TAJ , Appellants

V. HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INVESTM ENT, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 02669
- 2018 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell T his is an appeal from the trial court’s March 21, 2019 order denying appellant’s request for a temporary injunction. By notice filed August 15, 2019, appellee has informed the Court that a final judgment has been signed and prays the case be dismissed. A ttached to the notice is the judgment, which has also been included in a supplemental clerk’s record. We construe the notice as a motion to dismiss and grant the motion. The signing of a final judgment while an appeal of an order granting or denying a tem porary injunction is pending moots the appeal. See Isuani v. Manske

- Sheffield Radiology Grp., P.A. , 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991) (per curiam) . When an appeal from the denial of a temporary injunction becomes moot because a final judgment has been sign ed, we must set aside all previous trial court orders concerning the requested temporary injunction and dismiss the case. See id.– 2

–

(citing Tex. Foundries , Inc. v. Int’l Moulders & Foundry Workers’ Union , 248 S.W.2d 460, 461 (Tex. 1952).
M ore than ten days have passed since appellee’s motion was filed, and appellants have not responded to the motion. Because the trial court has signed a final judgment and nothing before us reflects the appeal is not moot, we grant the motion, set aside the trial court’s or der denying the request for a temporary injunction , and dismiss the case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a); Isuani , 802
S.W.2d at 236.

190369F.P05 /Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBEDA TAJ, Appellants
No. 05

- 19

- 00369

- CV V.
HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INVESTMENT, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 02669

- 2018. Opi nion delivered by Justice Nowell, Chief Justice Burns and Justice Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we SET ASIDE the trial court’s order denying the request for temporary injunction and DISMISS the case

. We ORDER that appellee Highlander Community Services and Investment, LLC recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Satfraz Taj and Zubeda Taj.

Judgment entered this 27 th day of August, 2019.
Exhibit 4.14



SCHEDULE E

To the Treasury & Reservation Order of Vannessa Ventures Ltd. Dated May 15, 2007



UNLESS PERMITTED UNDER SECURITIES LEGISLATION, THE HOLDER OF THIS SECURITY MUST NOT TRADE THE SECURITY BEFORE SEPTEMBER 16, 2007.



WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE SECURITIES LEGISLATION, THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON CONVERSION OF THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE TRADED ON OR THROUGH THE FACILITIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE OR OTHERWISE IN CANADA OR TO OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF A CANADIAN RESIDENT UNTIL SEPTEMBER 16, 2007



VANNESSA VENTURES LTD.

(Organized under the laws of British Columbia)



Cdn. $3,000,000



Unsecured 8% Convertible Note due May 15, 2009



For value received,
  VANNESSA VENTURES LTD. (the Corporation), of Suite 220, 1010-1st
  Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2R 1K4, hereby acknowledges itself indebted to
  and promises to pay to Auro Investments Pty Ltd. of Level 5 Citibank House,
  37 St. Georges Terrace, Perth, WA, 6000 Australia (the Holder)
  on May 15, 2009 or on such earlier date as the principal hereof becomes payable
  in accordance with the provisions of this Note, the principal sum of $3,000,000
  in lawful money of Canada on the presentation and surrender of this Note at
  the principal office of the Corporation in the City of Calgary (unless this
  Note shall have been previously redeemed or converted in accordance with the
  terms and conditions attached hereto as Schedule A and forming part
  hereof (the Terms and Conditions)) and to pay interest on
  such principal amount at a rate of 8 per cent per annum (8%) (after as well
  as before each of maturity, default and judgment) as provided in the Terms and
  Conditions.  The Terms and Conditions are hereby incorporated by reference
  herein.



This
  Note is convertible, at the option of the Holder, into Units (as defined in
  the Terms and Conditions), and is redeemable in certain circumstances at the
  option of the corporation, upon and subject to the provisions and conditions
  contained in the said Terms and Conditions.  The Schedule and the Exhibits
  attached hereto are incorporated in this Note by reference and are deemed to
  be an integral part hereof.



IN
  WITNESS WHEREOFthe Corporation has caused this Note to be executed by its
  duly authorized officer as of the 15th day of May, 2007.



VANNESSA
  VENTURES LTD.





Per:
  ________________________
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133427 Michael F. Cavanagh 

(35) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

MICHAEL ROBERT SCHILS, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133427 

 COA: 274231 

Washtenaw CC: 05-000966-CZ 

WASHTENAW COUNTY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 24, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

l1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gerard Dab, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of VisualMED Clinical Solutions Corp.; 

2.      Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the Consolidated Financial Statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave: 

       (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

       (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

       (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occured during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

       (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

       (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: September 28, 2007

|   | /s/ Gerard Dab   |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:                 | Gerard Dab  |
|   | Title:                | Principal Executive Officer,Secretary and amember of the Board of Directors |
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Andre Deshawn James, Appellant

No. 06-23-00058-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 349th District Court of 

Houston County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 20CR180). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Rambin, Chief Justice Stevens and 

Justice van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Andre Deshawn James, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 28, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Leroy L. ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 46111.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 9, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 30, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied May 25, 1993.

*547Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and TURNAGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.-16(b).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GULF UNITED ENERGY, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DAVID POMERANTZDavid Pomerantz
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

Dated:  July 11, 2007





















---
EXHIBIT 4.0


THE SECURITIES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THIS AGREEMENT HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE "SECURITIES ACT"), NOR REGISTERED UNDER
ANY STATE SECURITIES LAW, AND ARE "RESTRICTED SECURITIES" AS THAT TERM IS
DEFINED IN RULE 144 UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT. THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED
FOR SALE, SOLD OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED, EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, OR PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION
FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, THE AVAILABILITY OF WHICH IS TO BE
ESTABLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ISSUER.

                         LAST MILE LOGISTICS GROUP, INC.
                              A FLORIDA CORPORATION

Number                                                         __________ Shares
000


                 AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 100,000,000,000 SHARES
                                PAR VALUE: $.0001


         THIS CERTIFIES THAT ___________________________________________________

         is hereby issued ________________________________________fully paid and
non-assessable Shares of Common Stock of the above named Corporation
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has authorized this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers on ___________________,
2006.




________________________________________             ___________________________
Regina R. Flood, Chief Executive Officer             Brian P. Flood, Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21467-21468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11920]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:00 a.m. on 
Tuesday, May 7, 1996, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's corporate activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph N. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of 
the Currency), Director Jonathan L. Fiechter (Acting Director, Office 
of Thrift Supervision), and Chairman Ricki Helfer, that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven 
days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of

[[Page 21468]]

the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsection (c)(2) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(2)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: May 7, 1996.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11920 Filed 5-8-96; 12:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5981 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5981

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to be used to support drag theater 
                             performances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2023

        Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

       Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to be used to support drag theater 
                             performances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    No Federal funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise 
made available to any program, project, or activity that involves the 
hosting or that otherwise involves supporting drag shows, performances, 
testimonials, or any demonstrations involving drag. For purposes of 
this section, the term ``drag'' refers to dressing in clothing that is 
typical of the opposite gender, including by using exaggeratedly 
gendered mannerisms or by combining elements of typically male and 
female dress, or in elaborate or outrageous gendered costumes.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  Carbonics
Capital Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The Annual Report on Form 10KSB of the Company for the Year ended  December
     31, 2007 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or
     78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                     /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                                     --------------------------------------
Dated: April 15, 2008                         KEVIN KREISLER
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                     /S/      JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                     --------------------------------------
Dated: April 15, 2008                         JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                              Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.01

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert M. Alderman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
    fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

    b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2005
-----------------------

By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 17, 2017

Order 

Clerk

March 17, 2017

154987(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 154987

v COA: 333602

Wayne CC: 02-001578-01-FC

JOHNNY TIPPINS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file a 

supplemental pleading in support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. 

The supplemental pleading will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before 

April 7, 2017.
#### Don and Betty SHARP, Appellant, v. Harold FRIDKIN, and Linde, Thompson, Langworthy, Kohn, et al., Respondents.

No. WD 47595.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 26, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 30, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 25, 1994.

Christopher R. Williams, Walker & Williams, Kansas City, for appellant.

David M. Rhodus, Daniel J. Ryan, Roy F. Walters, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before TURNAGE, C.J., and FENNER and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from judgment granting summary judgment because the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
ACCEPTED

03-15-00204-CV

5909465

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/1/2015 5:28:31 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/1/2015 5:28:31 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6332** 

KERMIT DUANE HAYDEN , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WARDEN F. J. CARAWAY , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00173

- JFM )

Submitted : July 20, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before DUNCAN, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Kermit Duane Hayden, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kermit Duane Hayden , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayden v. Caraway , No. 1:11

- cv - 00173

- JFM (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED