Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices 22053

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of Jan. 15 through Jan. 19, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Jan. 16, 1996 .......... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico.VSO–0079 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at Albuquerque Operations Office

would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

Do .................... Chris A. Schaefer, San Rafael, California VFA–0114 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

March 20, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by Savannah River Operation Office would be rescinded, and Charles A. Schaefer would receive access to

certain Department of Energy information.

Do .................... Stand of Amarillo, Inc., Albuquerque,

New Mexico.

VFA–0115 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The November 2, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Albuquerque Operation Office would be rescinded, and Stand of Amarillo, Inc. would receive access

to certain Department of Energy information.

Do .................... Tech, Inc., Herndon, Virginia ................... VFA–0113 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The December 15, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Western Area Power Administration would be

rescinded, and Tech, Inc. would receive access to certain

DOE information.

Jan. 17, 1996 .......... Phoenix Rising Communications, Stockton, California.VFA–0116 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The December 28, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Oakland Operations Office would be rescinded, and Phoenix Rising Communications would receive access to certain DOE information.

Jan. 18, 1996. ......... Idaho Operations Office, Idaho Falls,

Idaho.

VSO–0080 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at Idaho Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

[FR Doc. 96–11913 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of

February 19 Through February 23,

1996

During the week of February 19

through February 23, 1996, the appeals

and applications for exception or other

relief listed in the Appendix to this

Notice were filed with the Office of

Hearings and Appeals of the Department

of Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585–0107.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of February 19 through February 23, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Feb. 20, 1996 ......... Dan’s Rental, Memphis, Tennessee ....... RR300–270 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 29, 1996 Dismissal, Case

No. RF300–19585, issued to Dan’s Rental in the Gulf refund proceeding would be rescinded and the firm’s refund

application reinstated.

Do .................... Daniel’s Gulf, Memphis, Tennessee ........ RR300–266 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 29, 1996 Dismissal, Case

No. RF300–19586, issued to Daniel’s Gulf in the Gulf refund proceeding would be rescinded and the firm’s refund

application reinstated.

Do .................... Dix Gulf, Memphis, Tennessee ............... RR300–269 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 29, 1996 Dismissal, Case

No. RF300–19588, issued to Dix Gulf in the Gulf refund

proceeding would be rescinded and the firm’s refund application reinstated.
22054 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS—Continued

[Week of February 19 through February 23, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Do .................... Hilltop Gulf, Memphis, Tennessee .......... RR300–268 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 31, 1996 Dismissal, Case

No. RF300–18730, issued to Hilltop Gulf in the Gulf refund

proceeding would be rescinded and the firm’s refund application reinstated.

Do .................... John L. Sutton, Jr. Gulf, Memphis, Tennessee.RR300–267 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 31, 1996 Dismissal, Case

No. RF300–21410, issued to John L. Sutton, Jr. Gulf in the

Gulf refund proceeding would be rescinded and the firm’s

refund application reinstated.

Do .................... Moore Brothers, Anaheim, California ...... RR272–232 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund

Proceeding.If granted: The January 17, 1990 Decision and

Order, Case Number RF272–4527, issued to Moore Brothers regarding the firm’s application for refund submitted in

the Crude Oil refund proceeding would be modified.

Feb. 21, 1996 ......... Oak Ridge Operations Office, Knoxville,

Tennessee.

VSA–0057 Request for Review of Opinion under 10 C.F.R. Part 710. If

granted: At the request of an individual employed at the

Oak Ridge Operations Office, the January 25, 1996 Opinion of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Case Number

VSO–0057, would be reviewed.

Do .................... On-Site Fuel Oil Co., Inc. Brooklyn, New

York.

RR300–272 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The December 14, 1995 Dismissal,

Case No. RF300–16898, issued to On-Site Fuel Oil Co., in

the Gulf Oil refund rescinded and the firm’s refund application reinstated.

Do .................... Sanders Gulf, Gulf Shores, Alabama ...... RR300–273 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The January 30, 1996 Dismissal,

Case No. RF300–18795, issued to Sanders Gulf in the

Gulf Oil refund proceeding would be rescinded and the

firm’s refund application reinstated.

Feb. 23, 1996 ......... C. W. Mullock Gulf, Memphis, Tennessee.RR300–271 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Gulf Refund Proceeding. If granted: The February 7, 1996 Dismissal Letter

Case Number RF300–18186, issued to C.W. Mullock Gulf

in the Gulf refund proceeding would be rescinded and the

firm’s refund application reinstated.

Do .................... Government Accountability Project,

Washington, DC.

VFA–0134 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 17, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement would

be rescinded, and the Government Accountability Project

would receive access to certain DOE information.

[FR Doc. 96–11914 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of January

29 Through February 2, 1996

During the week of January 29

through February 2, 1996, the appeals

and applications for exception or other

relief listed in the Appendix to this

Notice were filed with the Office of

Hearings and Appeals of the Department

of Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.