20818 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Notices

(PM) 23, Registration Division (7505C),

Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.

Office location and telephone number:

Rm. 237, CM#2, 1921 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA, (703) 305–

7830; e-mail:

miller.joanne@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AgrEvo

USA Co., Little Falls Center One, 2711

Centerville Rd., Wilmington, DE 19808,

has requested in pesticide petition (PP)

5G4466, the establishment of temporary

tolerances for residues of the combined

herbicide glufosinate-ammonium

(butanoic acid, 2-amino-4-

(hydroxymethylphosphinyl-),

monoammonium salt; and its

metabolites 2-acetamido-4-

methylphosphinico-butanoic acid and

3-methylphosphinico-propionic acid

expressed as glufosinate free acid

equivalents in or on the raw agricultural

commodities field corn grain at 0.2 part

per million (ppm); field corn forage at

4.0 ppm; field corn fodder and soybeans

at 2.0 ppm; soybean forage at 4.0 ppm;

soybean hay at 2.0 ppm; soybean

aspirated grain fractions at 25.0 ppm;

soybean hulls at 5.0 ppm; eggs at 0.05

ppm; poultry meat and fat at 0.05 ppm;

and poultry meat byproducts at 0.10

ppm. These temporary tolerances will

permit the marketing of the above raw

agricultural commodities when treated

in accordance with the provisions of the

experimental use permit 45639-EUP-56,

which is being issued under the Federal

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide

Act (FIFRA), as amended (Pub. L. 95–

396, 92 Stat. 819; 7 U.S.C. 136).

The scientific data reported and other

relevant material were evaluated, and it

was determined that establishment of

the temporary tolerances will protect

the public health. Therefore, the

temporary tolerances have been

established on the condition that the

herbicide be used in accordance with

the experimental use permit and with

the following provisions:

1. The total amount of the active

ingredient to be used must not exceed

the quantity authorized by the

experimental use permit.

2. AgrEvo USA Co., must immediately

notify the EPA of any findings from the

experimental use that have a bearing on

safety. The company must also keep

records of production, distribution, and

performance and on request make the

records available to any authorized

officer or employee of the EPA or the

Food and Drug Administration.

These tolerances expire March 15,

1997. Residues not in excess of these

amounts remaining in or on the raw

agricultural commodities after this

expiration date will not be considered

actionable if the herbicide is legally

applied during the term of, and in

accordance with, the provisions of the

experimental use permit and temporary

tolerances. These tolerances may be

revoked if the experimental use permit

is revoked or if any experience with or

scientific data on this herbicide indicate

that such revocation is necessary to

protect the public health.

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this notice from the

requirement of section 3 of Executive

Order 12866.

Pursuant to the requirements of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–

354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601–612),

the Administrator has determined that

regulations establishing new tolerances

or raising tolerance levels or

establishing exemptions from tolerance

requirements do not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. A certification

statement to this effect was published in

the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46

FR 24950).

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a(j).

List of Subjects

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: April 29, 1996.

Stephen L. Johnson,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 96–11340 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

[FRL–5502–7]

Proposed De Minimis Settlement

Under Section 122(g) of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation and Liability

Act; In the Matter of Albion-Sheridan

Landfill Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

SUMMARY: Notice of De Minimis

Settlement: in accordance with Section

122(I)(1) of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation

and Liability Act of 1980, as amended

(‘‘CERCLA’’), notice is hereby given of a

de minimis settlement concerning past

and estimated future response actions at

the Albion-Sheridan Landfill Site in

Albion, Michigan. The Attorney General

has provided the required prior written

approval for this Settlement, as set forth

under Section 122(g)(4) of CERCLA.

DATES: Comments must be provided on

or before June 7, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

addressed to the Docket Clerk, Mail

Code MFA–10J, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, and

should refer to: In the Matter of AlbionSheridan Landfill Site, Docket No. V–

W–96–340.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt

N. Lindland, Mail Code CS–29A, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

following parties executed binding

certifications of their consent to

participate in the settlement: Albion

College, Bilicke Oldsmobile Sales, Inc.,

and Frahm Chevrolet, Buick, Pontiac

Co.

These parties will pay approximately

$30,000 in settlement payments for

response costs related to the AlbionSheridan Landfill Site, if the United

States Environmental Protection Agency

determines that it will not withdraw or

withhold its consent to the proposed

settlement after consideration of

comments submitted pursuant to this

notice.

U.S. EPA may enter into this

settlement under the authority of

Section 122(g) of CERCLA. Section

122(g) authorizes de minimis

settlements with potentially responsible

parties (‘‘PRPs’’) that contributed

hazardous substances to a site where

those contributions were small and

where the toxicity of the substances

contributed is not significantly different

from the other substances brought to the

site. Pursuant to this authority, the

agreement proposes to settle with

parties who are responsible for less than

.1% of the total volume of hazardous

substances sent to the site. Settling de

minimis PRPs will be required to pay

their fair share of the past and estimated

future response costs at the Site. The

settlement payment amount includes a

premium of 100% against estimated

future response costs to account for

potential cost overruns, the potential for

failure of the remedies selected to clean

up the site, and other risks.

A copy of the proposed administrative

order on consent and additional

background information relating to the

settlement, including a list of parties to

the settlement, are available for review

and may be obtained in person or by

mail from Kurt N. Lindland, Mail Code

CS–29A, U.S. Environmental Protection
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Notices 20819

Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

The U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency will receive written comments

relating to this settlement for thirty days

from the date of publication of this

notice.

Authority: The Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation, and

Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C.

Sections 9601 et seq.

William E. Muno,

Director, Superfund Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11487 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5501–9]

National Pin Service Site: Notice of

Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(g) of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended 42

U.S.C. 9601 et seq., the Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) has agreed to

settle claims for response costs at the

National Pin Service Site, Saratoga,

Wilson County, North Carolina, with the

Defense Reutilization and Market

Service (DRMS), Defense Logistic

Agency (DLA), U.S. Department of

Defense (DoD). EPA will consider public

comments on the proposed settlements

for thirty (30) days. EPA may withdraw

from or modify the proposed

settlements should such comments

disclose facts or considerations which

indicate the proposed settlement is

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

Copies of the settlements are available

from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4, Waste Management Division,

Waste Programs Branch, Cost Recovery

Section, 345 Courtland Street, NE.,

Atlanta, Georgia 30365, 404–347–5059,

vmx. 6169. Written comments must be

submitted to Mr. Ray Strickland at the

above address within thirty (30) days

from the date of publication.

Dated: April 12, 1996.

James S. Kutzman,

Acting Director, Waste Management Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11483 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5500–1]

Notice of Proposed Assessment of

Clean Water Act Class II Administrative

Penalty to Superior Spring Company

and Opportunity To Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed

administrative penalty assessment and

opportunity to comment.

SUMMARY: EPA is providing notice of

proposed administrative penalty

assessment for alleged violations of the

Clean Water Act. EPA is also providing

notice of opportunity to comment on the

proposed assessment.

Under 33 U.S.C. Section 1319(g), EPA

is authorized to issue orders assessing

civil penalties for various violations of

the Act. EPA may issue these orders

after the commencement of either a

Class I or Class II penalty proceeding.

EPA provides public notice of the

proposed assessments pursuant to 33

U.S.C. Section 1319(g)(4)(a).

Class II proceedings are conducted

under EPA’s Consolidated Rules of

Practice Governing the Administrative

Assessment of Civil Penalties and the

Revocation and Suspension of Permits,

40 CFR Part 22. The procedures through

which the public may submit written

comment on a proposed Class II order

or participate in a Class II proceeding,

and the Procedures by which a

Respondent may request a hearing, are

set forth in the Consolidated Rules. The

deadline for submitting public comment

on a proposed Class II order is thirty

days after publication of this notice.

On the date identified below, EPA

commenced the following Class II

proceeding for the assessment of

penalties:

In the Matter of Superior Spring Company,

formerly located at 2447 Merced Avenue,

South El Monte, California 91733, but now

located at 1260 South Talt Avenue, Anaheim,

California 92806; EPA Docket No. CWA–IX–

FY96–02; filed on April 22, 1996, with Mr.

Steven Armsey, Regional Hearing Clerk, U.S.

EPA, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, California 94105, (415) 744–1389;

proposed penalty of $60,000 for failure to

submit self-monitoring reports during the

final three and half years of operation in

South El Monte and for past violations of

local sewer discharge limits.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Persons wishing to receive a copy of

EPA’s Consolidated Rules, review of the

complaint or other documents filed in

this proceeding, comment upon a

proposed assessment, or otherwise

participate in the proceeding should

contact the Regional Hearing Clerk

identified above. The administrative

record for this proceeding is located in

the EPA Regional Office identified

above, and the file will be open for

public inspection during normal

business hours. All information

submitted by the respondent is available

as part of the administrative record,

subject to provisions of law restricting

public disclosure of confidential

information. In order to provide

opportunity for public comment, EPA

will issue no final order assessing a

penalty in these proceedings prior to

thirty (30) days after the date of

publication of this notice.

Dated: April 22, 1996.

Karen Schwinn,

Acting Director, Water Management Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11488 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Renewal Application Designated for

Hearing

1. The Assistant Chief, Audio Services

Division, has before him the following

application for renewal of broadcast

license:

Licensee City/state File No. MM docket No.

Southwestern Broadcasting Corporation ................... Brownfield, Texas ...................................................... BRH–900315UC 96–104

(Seeking renewal of the license for

KLZK(FM)).

2. Pursuant to Section 309(e) of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, the above application has

been designated for hearing in a

proceeding upon the following issues:

(a) To determine whether

Southwestern Broadcasting Corporation

has the capability and intent to

expeditiously resume the broadcast

operations of KLZK(FM), consistent

with the Commission’s Rules.

(b) To determine whether

Southwestern Broadcasting Corporation

has violated Sections 73.1740 and/or

73.1750 of the Commission’s Rules.

(c) To determine, in light of the

evidence adduced pursuant to the

foregoing issues, whether grant of the