Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 88 / Monday, May 6, 1996 / Notices 20231

2809.20.00 of the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule (HTS). HTS item numbers are

provided for convenience and for

Customs purposes. The written

description remains dispositive.

Final Results of Review

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on the

preliminary results. Because the

Department received no comments, we

have not changed the rate from the

preliminary results. Accordingly, the

following deposit requirement will be

effective for all shipments of the subject

merchandise entered, or withdrawn

from warehouse, for consumption on or

after the publication date of the final

results of this administrative review, as

provided for by section 751(a)(1) of the

Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Haifa

will be 6.82 percent; (2) for previously

reviewed or investigated companies not

listed above, the cash deposit rate will

continue to be the company-specific rate

published for the most recent period; (3)

if the exporter is not a firm covered in

any review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate

will be the rate established for the most

recent period for the manufacturer of

the merchandise; (4) for all other

producers and/or exporters of this

merchandise, the cash deposit rate shall

be 1.77 percent, the —all others— rate

from the LTFV investigation. These

deposit requirements, when imposed,

shall remain in effect until publication

of the final results of the next

administrative review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26(b) to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during these review periods.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675 (a)(1)) and 19

CFR 353.22.

Dated: April 26, 1996.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 96–11126 Filed 5–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–475–059]

Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape From

Italy; Termination of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of termination of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On November 16, 1995, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published in the Federal

Register (60 FR 57573) the notice of

initiation of the administrative review of

the antidumping duty finding on

pressure sensitive plastic tape from

Italy. We are terminating this review as

a result of the timely withdrawal by the

petitioner, Minnesota Mining and

Manufacturing Company (3M) of its

request for the review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 6, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Todd Peterson, Office of Antidumping

Compliance, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,

Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone:

(202) 482–4195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On October 30, 1995, 3M requested an

administrative review for 3M Italia

S.p.A. of the antidumping duty finding

on pressure sensitive plastic tape from

Italy for the period October 1, 1994,

through September 30, 1995, pursuant

to 19 CFR 353.22(a)(2). On November

16, 1995, the Department published in

the Federal Register (60 FR 57573) the

notice of initiation of that

administrative review. 3M timely

withdrew its request for a review on

February 5, 1996, pursuant to 19 CFR

353.22(a)(5). As a result, the Department

is terminating this review.

This notice is published in

accordance with section 751 of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19

U.S.C. 1675) and 19 CFR 353.22(a)(5).

Dated: March 21, 1996.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 96–11125 Filed 5–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

[A–538–802]

Shop Towels From Bangladesh;

Preliminary Results of Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review.

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Preliminary Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review.

SUMMARY: In response to a request from

the petitioner, Milliken & Company, the

Department of Commerce is conducting

an administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on shop towels

from Bangladesh. The review period is

March 1, 1994, through February 28,

1995. This review covers six

manufacturers/exporters. The

preliminary results of this review

indicate the existence of dumping

margins for several manufacturers/

exporters during the period.

Interested parties are invited to

comment on these preliminary results.

Parties who submit arguments are

requested to submit with each argument

(1) a statement of the issue and (2) a

brief summary of the argument.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 6, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Davina Hashmi or Michael Rill, Office

of Antidumping Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20230;

telephone (202) 482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,

the effective date of the amendments

made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act)

by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act

(URAA).

Background

On March 7, 1995, the Department of

Commerce (the Department) published a

notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request an

Administrative Review’’ (60 FR 12540)

of the antidumping duty order on shop

towels from Bangladesh (57 FR 9688,

March 20, 1992) for the period March 1,

1994, through February 28, 1995. On

March 27, 1995, the petitioner, Milliken

& Company (Milliken), requested an

administrative review of six

manufacturers/exporters: Eagle Star

Mills, Ltd. (Eagle Star); Greyfab

(Bangladesh) Ltd. (Greyfab); Hashem

International (Hashem); Khaled Textile

Mills Ltd. (Khaled); Shabnam Textiles