alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10952]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-31,882, 882A]


American Contract Sewing Corporation, Eufaula, OK and Mid-Western 
Industries, Tahlequah, OK; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility 
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 11, 
1996, applicable to all workers of American Contract Sewing 
Corporation, located in Eufaula, Oklahoma. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on March 25, 1996 (61 FR 12101).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm, Based on new information 
received by the State Agency, the Department is amending the 
certification to cover workers at the sister plant of the subject firm, 
Mid-Western Industries located in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. The production 
facility closed March 15, 1996. The workers at Tahlequah were engaged 
in employment related to the production of apparel.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports of apparel.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,882 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of American Contract Sewing Corporation, Eufaula, 
Oklahoma (TA-W-31,882) and Mid-Western Industries, Tahlequah, 
Oklahoma (TA-W-31,882A) who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after January 2, 1995 are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 
1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 19th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-10952 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Rodney Wilford Wede, Appellant

No. 06-18-00220-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 60894). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Rodney Wilford Wede, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 26, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### In the Matter of Wilma Audene CRICK, Deceased. Audie H. DUNNING, Appellant, v. James G. CRICK, Respondent.

No. 61699.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 12, 1993.

Russell A. Willis, III, Creve Coeur, for appellant.

Gerald J. Harvath, Pacific, for respondent. ■

CRIST, Judge.

Appellant, Audie H. Dunning (Brother), appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss his petition to determine the heirs of his sister, Wilma Audene Crick (Decedent). Brother also appeals the order determining James Gilbert Crick (Adopted Son) to be the sole heir and entitled to Decedent’s real estate in Missouri, but subject to any lawful dispositions here before or here after made by Adopted Son. We reverse.

Decedent died January 14, 1990, and her will was probated in Kentucky. This will was not filed for probate in Missouri within one year after Decedent’s death and, thus, was precluded from being probated by § 473.070, RSMo (Cum.Supp.1991). Brother and Adopted Son had entered into an agreement whereby Adopted Son had waived all interest in and to the property of Decedent in Kentucky and Missouri.

Brother had a right to dismiss his petition to determine heirship before he introduced evidence. Rule 67.01. The probate court lost jurisdiction to determine heirship upon Brother’s motion to dismiss, and Brother’s challenge to that order is moot. *See*Rule 67.01; *State, Division of Family Services v. Coholan,*706 S.W.2d 569, 570 (Mo.App.1986).

Adopted Son contends the probate court retained jurisdiction under Rule 67.05 because he had a counter-claim pending at the time of dismissal. Brother filed his petition to determine heirship alleging he was the sole devisee and heir under the *592Kentucky proceedings. Adopted Son filed an answer admitting all allegations of the petition except paragraph 6 and denying that Brother was entitled to recovery under the allegations of paragraph 6. Without any allegations of fact, and without denominating his answer as a counter-claim or cross-claim, Adopted Son prayed the Missouri real estate be awarded to him as Decedent’s heir.

The answer was not a counter-claim or cross-claim under Rule 67.05. *See*Rule 55.05. Since no counter-claim or cross-claim was pending when Brother dismissed his action, the probate court had no jurisdiction over the claim. *State ex rel. Fisher v. McKenzie,*754 S.W.2d 557, 560 (Mo.banc 1988).

The denial of Brother’s motion to dismiss is reversed. The order determining heir-ship is also reversed.

ÁHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11369]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Research Training Grant Applications in Allergy and 
Immunology.
    Date: May 13, 1996.
    Time: 4:00 p.m.
    Place: Teleconference, Solar Bldg., Room 3C40, 6003 Executive 
Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-4988.
    Contact Person: Dr. Dianne E. Tingley, Scientific Review Adm., 
6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C07, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7610, (301) 496-0818.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-11369 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5619 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to exclude 

certain military housing allowances from the calculation of household 

income, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mrs. RODGERS of Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a 

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to exclude certain military housing allowances from 

the calculation of household income, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Dependents 

5 School Meal Eligibility Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5619 IH

1 SEC. 2. DIRECT CERTIFICATION FOR CHILDREN WHO ARE 

2 MEMBERS OF A HOUSEHOLD OF A MEMBER 

3 OF A UNIFORMED SERVICE. 

4 (a) REPORT.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than October 1, 

6 2024, the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation 

7 with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Con8 gress a report on the feasibility and cost of estab9 lishing procedures under which children who are 

10 members of a household of a member of a uniformed 

11 service may be certified as eligible for free or re12 duced price lunches under the Richard B. Russell 

13 National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) 

14 and free or reduced price breakfasts under the Child 

15 Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.), 

16 without further application. 

17 (2) CONTENTS.—The report required under 

18 paragraph (1) shall evaluate a range of options for 

19 implementing direct certification, including— 

20 (A) the use and sharing of data collected 

21 for the calculation of the basic needs allowance 

22 under section 402b of title 37, United States 

23 Code, and other assistance programs for mem24 bers of a uniformed service; and 

25 (B) the exclusion of non-service member 

26 income from the calculation of household inVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:24 Sep 26, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5619.IH H5619

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5619 IH

1 come under the Richard B. Russell National 

2 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.). 

3 (b) EXCLUSION OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING

4 FROM INCOME CALCULATION.—Section 9(b)(13) of the 

5 Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1758(b)(13)) is amended by striking ‘‘, on behalf of’’ and 

7 all that follows through ‘‘related provision of law’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Shugart & Shugart *v.*Echota Cotton Mills *et al.*

No. 3231.

January 23, 1923.

Petition fox injunction. Before Judge Tarver. Gordon superior court. March *25, 1922.*

*M. B. Eubanks*and *Y. A. Henderson,*for plaintiffs.

*A. L. Henson, J. H. Paschall, J. G. B. Erwin,*and *Maddox, McOamy & Shumale,*for defendants.

Atkinson, J.

On conflicting evidence the court did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

*•Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

**TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC (Georgia)**

**TRX Technology Services, L.P. (Georgia)**

**TRX Data Services, Inc. (Virginia)**

**Technology Licensing Company, LLC (Georgia)**

**Travel Technology, LLC (Georgia)**

**TRX Luxembourg, S.á.r.l. (Luxembourg)**

**TRX UK, Ltd. (England and Wales)**

**TRX Europe, Ltd. (England and Wales)**

**         f/k/a eTRX, Ltd. d/b/a TRX Europe f/k/a Fortdove, Ltd**

**TRX GermanyGmbH (Germany)**

**TRX Technologies India Private Limited (India)**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE: 

2 p.m., Thursday, June 17, 2021.

# PLACE: 

Via Conference Call.

# STATUS: 

Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Annual Board of Directors meeting.                              ( print page 30337)    

The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(2) and (4) permit closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

    - Executive Session

## Agenda

I. Call to Order

II. Executive Session Discussion with General Counsel and Chief Audit Executive

III. Executive Session Executive Compensation Review

IV. Executive Session: Report from CEO

V. Executive Session: Report from CFO

                    VI. NeighborWorks CompassTM                     Update                

VII. Action Item Approval of Minutes

VIII. Action Item Board Elections and Appointments

IX. Action Item Revision of Bylaws for Creation of the Chief Information Officer Position

X. Action Item Management Elections

XI. Action Item Grants to the Capital Corporations

XII. Action Item HPN Launchpad Contract Extension

XIII. Action Item LIFT 8.0

XIV. Discussion Item Annual Ethics Review

XV. Discussion Item Annual Review of Governance Operations Guide

XVI. Discussion Item Investment Policy Review

XVII. Management Program Background and Updates

XVIII. Adjournment

*Portions Open to the Public:*                     Everything except the Executive Session.                

*Portions Closed to the Public:*                     Executive Session.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Lakeyia Thompson, Special Assistant, (202) 524-9940;                         *Lthompson@nw.org.*

Lakeyia Thompson,

Special Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2021-12020 Filed 6-3-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Barksdale, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.), rendered February 22, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and theft of services and sentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 4 to 8 years on each robbery conviction and one year on each remaining conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and his accomplices, three black males wearing leather jackets, were detained after they had run a subway turnstile. While the arresting officer was taking down infor*396mation for the issuance of a summons, additional police arrived with a report that a cab driver had just seen black males in leather jackets follow an elderly man into the subway station. The cab driver had alerted the police in the belief that a robbery was about to occur. Defendant was then frisked and a gun recovered from his outer clothing. He was subsequently transported first to the transit office and later taken to the precinct and thoroughly searched. An AT&T credit card was also recovered from defendant, either during the subway frisk or during the precinct search. This credit card led police to complainant, whom defendant and his accomplice had mugged at gunpoint earlier in the evening. Complainant, who had previously been unable to identify two other suspects, positively identified defendant and his accomplice in separate lineups. We find no impropriety in the arrest and subsequent search and identification of the defendant.

Regardless of where the credit card had been recovered from defendant, and taking into account minor inconsistencies as to how defendant was initially identified as the farebeater, each step of the procedure led logically and properly to each subsequent step. Defendant is not persuasive in arguing that the farebeating detention was a pretext for a full-blown search *(cf., People v Rossetti,*148 AD2d 357). The subway frisk, which was authorized by the defendant’s initial arrest for farebeating, was additionally justified by the subsequent information that defendant was about to commit a robbery. His prior detention was only a fortuitous, but proper, circumstance, and what eventually transpired was a search incident to arrest. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Asch and Smith, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this annualreport of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer ofMerrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:**

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 15, 2007
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32





<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Learningwire.com (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Stephen K. Smith, the President and
Chief Executive Officer and Michael Grove the Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                          KRANEM CORPORATION
                                          d/b/a
                                          LEARNINGWIRE.COM



May 6, 2007                               By: /s/ Stephen K. Smith
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Stephen K. Smith, President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer


May 7, 2007                               By: /s/ Michael Grove
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Michael Grove, Principal Financial
                                             and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), we, Kraig Higginson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Thomas R. Bailey, Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


     Dated: 3-29-04                           /s/ Kraig Higginson
           ---------                          ----------------------------
                                              Kraig Higginson
                                              Chief Executive Officer

     Dated: 3/29/04                           /s/ Thomas R. Bailey
           ---------                          ----------------------------
                                              Thomas R. Bailey,
                                              Treasurer
CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin Watson, certify that:

1.    I  have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of
    TDL Infomedia Holdings plc;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238 and 34-
47986];

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have
    disclosed,  based  on our most recent  evaluation  of
    internal  control  over financial reporting,  to  the
    company's  auditors and the audit  committee  of  the
    company's board of directors (or persons performing the
    equivalent functions):

    (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
         in the design or operation of internal control over
         financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
         adversely affect the company's ability to record,
         process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role
         in the company's internal control over financial
         reporting.


Date:  		23 March 2004
Signature:  /s/ KJ Watson
Title: 		Chief Financial Officer