alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

302 CERTIFICATION

I, Jorge Bravo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cross Atlantic
Commodities, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in case of an
quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: August 7, 2008                /s/ Jorge Bravo
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Jorge Bravo
                                   President & Chief Executive Officer


                                       22
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5738 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary concerned 

to pay, rather than provide reimbursement, for the transportation of 

certain remains to two locations if the second location is a national 

cemetery. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 

Mr. WALTZ (for himself, Mr. MOULTON, and Mr. MILLS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary concerned to pay, rather than provide reimbursement, for the transportation of certain remains to two 

locations if the second location is a national cemetery. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abbey Gate Gold Star 

5 Families Dignified Transport Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5738 IH

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT INSTEAD OF REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE 

2 TRANSPORTATION OF CERTAIN REMAINS TO 

3 TWO LOCATIONS IF THE SECOND LOCATION 

4 IS A NATIONAL CEMETERY. 

5 Section 1482(a)(8)(B) of title 10, United States 

6 Code, is amended by striking the second sentence. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT W ILLIAM J. LATHAN, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. THE C ITY OF W H ITTIER , ALASKA; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 11-35684 D.C . No. 3:10-c v-00070-TM B M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ala ska Tim othy M . B urge ss, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 12, 2013 ** B e fore : PREGER SON, REINHAR DT, a n d W . FLETC HER , C irc uit Judge s. W illia m J. La tha n a ppe a l s pro se from the distric t c o urt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his c opy

right infringe m e nt a c tion. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo. W orth v . Se lc how

& Righte r

C o. , 827 F.2d 569, 571 

# FIL ED MAR 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(9th C ir. 1987). W e a ffirm .

The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use the C opy right Ac t’ s fa ir use de fe nse ba rs Latha n ’ s a c t ion. 17 U.S.C . § 107 (2006); se e also Pe rfe c t 10, Inc . v . Amazon.c om, Inc . , 508 F.3d 1146, 1163 (9th C ir. 2007) (“ The [fa ir use ] de fe nse e nc o ura ge s a n d a llows thede ve lopm e nt of ne w ide a s tha t build on e arlie r one s , thus providing a ne c e ssa ry c ounte rba la

n c e to the c opy

right la w’ s goa l of prote c ting c re ators’ work produc t.” ); id. at 1163-68 (e xpla ining fourfa c t or te st for fa ir use ana ly sis). B e c a use the distric t c ourt prope rly m a de a finding of fair use , we ne e d not re vie w the distric t c o urt’ s finding tha t the m e rge r doc trine a lso ba rs Latha n ’ s a c tion. AFFIRM E D.

1 1 - 3 5 6 8 4 2
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Dirkson R. Charles, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of K&F Industries Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                 Date: November 7, 2005 /s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES         Dirkson R. Charles    Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer
#### Allen R. ETHRIDGE, Appellant, v. WESTERN LITHOTECH, et al., Respondents.

No. 65178.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

June 28, 1994.

Carla G. McBride, St. Louis, for appellant.

Edward M. Vokoun, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

The ALJ found that appellant does not suffer from an occupational disease as a result of his exposure to substances while in the employ of respondent Western Lithotech in that he has suffered no disability resulting in anxiety and depression. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s award.

The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### Martin Platt, Plaintiff, *v.*Whitelawn Dairies, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

March 5, 1956.

*U. Lawrence Bergstein*for defendant.

*Harry Krauss*for plaintiff.

M. Henry Martuscello, J.

This is a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first cause of action pursuant to rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

The action is based upon an alleged oral agreement entered into by plaintiff and defendant in September of 1951. The complaint alleges that in consideration of plaintiff’s introduction of the defendant to the Grand Union Stores, the defendant was to pay plaintiff certain specified commissions on sales of ice cream by the defendant to the Grand Union Stores. The commissions were to be paid on all sales and it was provided that “ in the event the defendant ceased serving such customer for any reason whatsoever, the contract was to terminate upon payment to the plaintiff of all earned commissions. ’ ’ In addition to denying the material allegations of the complaint, the defendant’s answer sets up an affirmative defense that the alleged oral contract was not to be performed within a year from the making thereof and that consequently it was void under the Statute of Frauds.

*20The question presented for determination is whether the contract pleaded “ By its terms is not to he performed within one year from the making thereof ” (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1).

Defendant relies on *Martocci*v. *Greater New York Brewery*(301 N. Y. 57, 62) and *Cohen*v. *Bartgis Bros. Co.*(264 App. Div. 260, affd. 289 N. Y. 846) as authorities to sustain its defense.

I find said cases are distinguishable from the one at bar and are therefore not controlling. There, the contracts involved bound the parties thereto for indefinite periods of time, without any provision being made therein for the possible termination of the contractual relationships within a year. In the instant case, the agreement pleaded, although of indefinite duration, provides, in effect, that it is to terminate in the event either Grand Union Stores or the defendant decide to cease doing business with each other. The event thus regulating the termination of the contract may take place within a year; and if it does, the contract, by its own terms is fully performed and comes to an end. Consequently, the Statute of Frauds does not apply. (See *Blake*v. *Voigt,*134 N. Y. 69; *Raymond Spector Co.*v. *Serutan Co.,*60 N. Y. S. 2d 212, affd. 270 App. Div. 993, motion for leave to appeal denied 270 App. Div. 1014; *Price*v. *Reynolds Metals Co.,*69 F. Supp. 82, 86; cf. *Nat Nal Service Stations*v. *Wolf,*304 N. Y. 332.)

Motion denied. Settle order.
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 The
        undersigned, Thomas W. Colligan, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of
        the
        Board of Directors and Treasurer of YACHT FINDERS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
        HEREBY CERTIFY that:
 
 1.
        The
        Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
        2008
        (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
        this **** 11th
        day
        of November, 2008.
  */s/****Thomas****W.****Colligan*ThomasW.ColliganChiefExecutiveOfficerandChiefFinancialOfficer
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        YACHT FINDERS, INC. and will be retained by YACHT FINDERS, INC. and furnished
        to
        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4990



# 
C ARLTON L EE F ARMER ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern.

Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.

(CR-01-12-HO) Submitted: July 31, 2002 Decided: November 4, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Charles Everett Robinson, ROBINSON LAW OFFICE, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney,Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Carlton Lee Farmer appeals from his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000), and possession of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) (2000). On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the felonin possession of a firearm count. Farmer argues that under North Carolina law he was permitted to possess a firearm at his residence, pursuant to the North Carolina Felony Firearms Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-415.1(a) (1993 & Supp. 1999), and therefore the Government did not prove that he was in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). We disagree and affirm the conviction. The North Carolina Felony Firearms Act provides for "the right of any person to have possession of a firearm within his home or on his lawful place of business." N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-415.1(a). Farmer claims that, because he was permitted to possess the handgun in his home under North Carolina law, he was not a convicted felon within the meaning of § 922(g). Farmer’s claim is foreclosed, however, by the Supreme Court’s decision in Caron v. United States , 524 U.S. 308 (1998).
In Caron , the Supreme Court adopted an "all or nothing approach," holding that if the state places any restrictions on the felon’s abilityto possess a firearm, then his previous conviction falls within the definition of 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20) (2000) on which a § 922 conviction may be based. See id. at 314-15. The Court upheld Caron’s convictionfor being a felon in possession of a firearm, even though Caron’s firearm possession was legal under Massachusetts law. Here, the North Carolina Felony Firearms Act prohibits convictedfelons whose civil rights have been otherwise restored from possessing handguns outside of their home or lawful place of business. See 2 U NITED S TATES v. F ARMERN.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-415.1(a). This restriction, similar to that at issue in Caron , is sufficient to satisfy the requirement of § 922(g). We therefore affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. F ARMER
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF OFFICERS
 OF
BIO-BRIDGE SCIENCE, INC.
 PURSUANT
TO 18 USC ss. 1350
 
 I, Liang
Qiao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (a) The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 of Bio-Bridge
Science, Inc. (the "Company"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (b)
Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
      August 13, 2009
              
              /s/ Dr. Liang
      QiaoBy:
      Dr. Liang Qiao
                Chief
      Executive Officer
  I, Chuen
Huei (Kevin) Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (c) The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 of Bio-Bridge
Science, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (d)
Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
      August 13, 2009
              
              /s/ Chuen Huei (Kevin)
      LeeBy:
      Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee
                Chief
      Financial Officer and
                Principal
      Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20503-20504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11404]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 301

[IA-41-93]
RIN 1545-AS04


Automatic Extension of Time for Filing Individual Income Tax 
Returns; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public

[[Page 20504]]

hearing on proposed regulations that reflect the new procedures for 
obtaining an automatic extension of time to file an individual income 
tax return.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for May 8, 1996, 
beginning at 10:00 a.m. is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Slaughter of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of the public hearing is 
proposed regulations under sections 6081 and 6651 of the Internal 
Revenue Code. A notice of proposed rulemaking by cross reference to 
temporary regulations and notice of public hearing appearing in the 
Federal Register for Thursday, January 4, 1996 (61 FR 338), announced 
that a pubic hearing on the proposed regulations would be held on 
Wednesday, May 8, 1996, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the IRS Auditorium, 
7400 Corridor, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, D.C.
    The public hearing scheduled for Wednesday, May 8, 1996, is 
cancelled.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 96-11404 Filed 5-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 14, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24262-24263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12044]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 24263]]


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-106; RM-8797]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Hopkinsville, KY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Rockin' C Broadcasting proposing the allotment of Channel 248A at 
Hopkinsville, Kentucky, as the community's third local commercial FM 
transmission service. Channel 248A can be allotted to Hopkinsville in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements with a site restriction of 10 kilometers (6.3 miles) south 
to avoid a short-spacing to the licensed site of Station WHRZ(FM), 
Channel 249A, Providence, Kentucky. The coordinates for Channel 248A at 
Hopkinsville are North Latitude 36-46-18 and West Longitude 87-28-28.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 1, 1996 and reply 
comments on or before July 16, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Carol 
B. Ingram, President, Rockin' C Broadcasting, 212 Turtle Creek Drive, 
Batesville, Mississippi 38606 (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-106, adopted April 29, 
1996, and released May 8, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Andrew J. Rhodes,
Acting Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-12044 Filed 5-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F