alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RMD Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

| (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated:  April 18, 2008 | By:        /s/ Patrick A. Galliher |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Patrick A. Galliher                                                   |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer                                               |
Saitta J.

466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) (establishing two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 987, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996) (adopting the test in Strickland); see also Molina v. State, 120 Nev. 185, 192, 87 P.3d 533, 538 (2004) (a petitioner claiming that counsel did not conduct an adequate investigation must specify what a more thorough investigation would have uncovered). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



# r cLA...st 

### ‘-g---Csc Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Terrence M. Jackson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 19474 

### e
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2137-2138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1090]




-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
43 CFR Public Land Order 7179

[CA-940-5700-00; CACA 32220]


Withdrawal of National Forest System Land for a University of 
California-Berkeley Seismic Observatory; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws 45 acres of National Forest System land 
from mining for a period of 20 years to protect the seismic integrity 
of a University of California-Berkeley seismic observatory. The land 
has been and will remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 25, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duane Marti, BLM California State 
Office (CA-931), 2800 Cottage Way, 

[[Page 2138]]
Sacramento, California 95825, 916-979-2858.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described 
National Forest System land is hereby withdrawn from location and entry 
under the United States mining laws (30 U.S.C. Ch. 2 (1988)), but not 
from leasing under the mineral leasing laws, to protect the seismic 
integrity of a University of California-Berkeley seismic observatory:

Mount Diablo Meridian

Klamath National Forest

T. 45 N., R. 8 W.,
    Sec. 24, NE\1/4\SE\1/2\ and N\1/2\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 45 acres in Siskiyou County.

    2. The withdrawal made by this order does not alter the 
applicability of those land laws governing the use of the National 
Forest System land under lease, license, or permit, or governing the 
disposal of their mineral or vegetative resources other than under the 
mining laws.
    3. This withdrawal will expire 20 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1988), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: December 18, 1995.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 96-1090 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Learning Quest Technologies, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Fred Hall, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Fred Hall Fred Hall Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Date: August 11, 2006
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, Kathleen A. Stafford certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations;and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 10, 2005 /s/ Kathleen A. Stafford        Kathleen A. Stafford   Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 22042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11833]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-159-000]


Shell Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Technical Conference

May 7, 1996.
    Take notice that the technical conference in the above captioned 
proceeding, previously scheduled for April 17, 1996, has been 
rescheduled to be held on May 16, 1996. The Conference will be convened 
at 10:00 p.m. at the Commission's offices, located at 888 First St., 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. All parties are invited to attend. For 
further information contact Fred Koester, (202) 208-2258, or Robert 
Wolfe, (202) 208-2098.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11833 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Thursday, June 10, 2021.

# PLACE:

Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be held via teleconference.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Board Appeal. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-12047 Filed 6-4-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly reports of Propex Fabrics Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph F. Dana                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|May 15, 2006                              
|                                          
|/s/ Philip D. Barnes                      
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|May 15, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11061]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. PR96-3-000]


Equitable Storage Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

April 29, 1996.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference in the above-
captioned proceeding will be held on Wednesday, May 30, 1996, at 10 
a.m. in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Attendance will be limited to the parties and staff. For additional 
information, please contact Esref Bilgihan at (202) 208-0128.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11061 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5868 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to permit the Council 

of the District of Columbia to enact laws with respect to the organization 

and jurisdiction of the District of Columbia courts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2023 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to permit 

the Council of the District of Columbia to enact laws 

with respect to the organization and jurisdiction of the 

District of Columbia courts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Courts Home Rule Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5868 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF COUNCIL OF DISTRICT OF COLUM2 BIA TO ENACT LAWS WITH RESPECT TO DIS3 TRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS. 

4 Section 602(a) of the District of Columbia Home 

5 Rule Act (sec. 1–206.02(a), D.C. Official Code) is amend6 ed by striking paragraph (4). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 16, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 16, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0251. IN THE INTEREST OF P. H. P., A CHILD (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 02816J0753
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

1

 552 U.S. 85 (2007). 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-51057

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

VICTOR VALENZUELA-GUERRERO, also known as Victor Valenzuela

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:08-CR-1444-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor Valenzuela-Guerrero appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. Valenzuela argues that his guidelines 1

sentence should not be presumed reasonable because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is flawed

under Kimbrough v. United States because it is not empirically-based. He also 2

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 29, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10819

 564 F.3d 357 (5th Cir. 2009). 3

Id. at 366. 4

 U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, comment 6 (“A conviction taken into account under subsection (b)(1)

5

is not excluded from consideration of whether that conviction receives criminal history points

pursuant to Chapter Four, Part A (Criminal History).”).

U.S. v. Hawkins, 69 F.3d 11, 13–15 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding that under U.S.S.G. §

6

2K2.1 “the Guidelines permit consideration of [the defendant]’s felony conviction in calculating

both his offense level and his criminal history.”).

2

argues that his sentence is greater than necessary to meet the sentencing goals

of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) because the Guidelines account for his prior conviction

both to increase his offense level and to calculate his criminal history score.

We have rejected Valenzuela’s first argument in United States v.

Mondragon-Santiago, holding that Kimbrough does not address the appellate 3

presumption of reasonableness, instead reminding that it is within the discretion

of the district court “to consider the policy decisions behind the Guidelines,

including the presence or absence of empirical data, as part of their § 3553(a)

analysis.” As in Mondragon-Santiago, we decline to second guess the district 4

court’s decision simply because a Guideline may not be empirically-based.

Valenzuela’s second argument that the Guidelines double counted his prior

conviction is also unavailing. The Guidelines do not prohibit double counting.5

And we have approved of double counting under similar circumstances.6

Accordingly, Valenzuela has not shown that the district court erroneously

calculated the guideline range of imprisonment.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M. Spiezio,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section.1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| /s/ JAMES M. SPIEZIO     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James M. Spiezio         |
| Chief Financial  Officer |
| March 29,  2007     |

 

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40754 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee,
versus ROGELIO ORTIZ-IBARRA, Plaintiff-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 94-CR-106-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rogelio Ortiz-Ibarra appeals the denial of his motion for modification of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He argues that an amendment to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, enacted prior to his sentencing hearing, permits modification of his sentence. We affirm for the same reasons given by the district court. United States v. Ortiz-Ibarra , No. 94-CR-106-01 (Aug. 21, 1995). AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brent M. Cook, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raser Technologies, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2007 |  | /s/    BRENT M.
COOK                                               
|                     |  | Brent M. Cook Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Martin F. Petersen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raser Technologies,
Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                                        
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2007 |  | /s/    MARTIN F.
PETERSEN                                                              
|                     |  | Martin F. Petersen Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)

A signed original of each of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Raser Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Raser Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.