alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1941-1942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1128]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Advisory Mental Health Council of the National 
Institute of Mental Health for January 1996.
    The meeting will be open to the public, as indicated, for 
discussion of NIMH policy issues and will include current 
administrative, legislative, and program developments. Attendance by 
the public will be limited to space available. Individuals who plan to 
attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
contact person named below in advance of the meeting.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) 
and 552b(c)(6), Title 4, U.S.C. and section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, 
a portion of the Council will be closed to the public as indicated 
below for the review, discussion and evaluation of individual grant 
applications. These applications, evaluations, and the discussions 
could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals, 
the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion 
of personal privacy.
    Ms. Joanna L. Kieffer, Committee Management Officer, National 
Institute of Mental Health, Parklawn Building, Room 9-105, 5600 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Area Code 301, 443-4333, will provide a 
summary of the meeting and a roster of committee members.
    Other information pertaining to the meetings may be obtained from 
the contact person indicated.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Mental Health Council.
    Date: January 29, 1996.
    Place: Conference Rooms G and H, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.
    Open: January 29, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Closed: January 29, 1 p.m. to adjournment.
    Contact Person: Carolyn Strete, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, 
Parklawn Building, 

[[Page 1942]]
Room 9-105, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 
443-3367.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the above 
meeting due to the partial shutdown of the Federal Government and the 
urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: January 19, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-1128 Filed 1-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0181 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JONATHAN JOSEPH PETERSON,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 16 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 9 2020

11/09/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0181
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12027]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular 
Biophysics Integrated Review Group; Maximizing Investigators' 
Research Award B Study Section.
    Date: July 1-2, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sudha Veeraraghavan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4166, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 827-5263, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#245751404c450a52414156455645434c4552454a644a4d4c0a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b585e4f434a055d4e4e594a594a4c434a5d4a456b454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: https://public.csr.nih.gov/StudySections/DBIB/BCMB, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 3, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12027 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Velisat Corp., Respondent, v RRRCB, Inc., Appellant.

In an action, *inter alia,*for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated May 18, 1988, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*448Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are triable issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendant. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Exhibit J




Unloading and Loading Time Periods, 

Delivery Device Return Schedule and Demurrage Charges




Unloading

Buyer shall instruct the trucks where to unload the Turbine Equipment and on which roads at the Project Site to transport the Turbine Equipment.  Buyer shall unload all Turbine Equipment and ancillary equipment within four (4) hours of the arrival of such equipment at the Project Site; provided that such four (4) hour period is within the hours of 7:00am and 3:30pm.  Buyer shall un-strap, remove and load the rigging used to secure the Turbine Equipment back on the trailers within such time frame.  Buyer shall pay within ten (10) Business Days of receipt of an invoice from Supplier the following demurrage charges if Buyer fails to timely unload any Turbine Equipment or ancillary equipment:

		
	Equipment Being Delivered

	Demurrage Charge


	Turbine Nacelle

	$150 per hour


	Blades

	$105 per hour


	Base, Lower-Mid or Upper-Mid Tower Section

	$150 per hour


	Top Tower Section

	$95 per hour


	Hubs, Parts Container

	$75 per hour







Scheduling

Supplier shall notify Buyer not later than twenty-four (24) hours in advance of scheduled deliveries and shall provide a delivery schedule update to Buyer as early as practicable on the day of scheduled delivery.

Return of Delivery Devices

Buyer shall repack each Delivery Device used in transporting the Turbine Equipment or ancillary equipment not later than two (2) weeks after the later of (i) the date the Turbine Equipment packed in such Delivery Device is scheduled to commence erection and installation pursuant to the Project Schedule and (ii) the date the Turbine Equipment packed in such Delivery Device is delivered to the Project Site.  Buyer shall make such Delivery Devices available for pick-up by Supplier at a single location at the Project Site.  Supplier shall be responsible for the costs and expenses related to the removal and transportation of such Delivery Devices from the Project Site, and Buyer shall pay Supplier for such costs and expenses at Supplier’s cost plus ten percent (10%).  If any Delivery Devices are not properly repacked within such time, Buyer shall pay the following demurrage charges to Supplier within ten (10) Business Days of receipt of an invoice from Supplier:




		
	Delivery Device

	Demurrage Charge


	Parts Container

	$100 per day


	Single Blade Frame

	$75 per day


	Nooteboom / Nacelle Frame

	$100 per day


	Hub Stand

	$75 per day
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of W. S. INDUSTRIES, INC. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I,
James F. Dempsey, President and Chief Executive Officer, respectively, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  January  16, 2009

                                               By: /s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
                                                   _____________________________
                                                       James F. Dempsey
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly Report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  June 10, 2009 /s/Frank Pioppi     Chief Executive Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5781 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit payments to be made 

to the law firms of court-appointed attorneys, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 

Mr. ARMSTRONG (for himself and Mr. IVEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit payments 

to be made to the law firms of court-appointed attorneys, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION OF DEFEND4 ANTS. 

5 Section 3006A(d)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 

6 is amended by inserting after ‘‘this section’’ the following: 

7 ‘‘, or a law firm designated by the attorney so appointed,’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
#### S.M. Pires et al., Respondents, v Frota Oceanica Brasileira, S. A., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about November 17, 1989, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to offer into evidence certain deposition testimony at trial, and (2) from an order of the same court entered on or about December 19, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants-appellants’ motion to strike plaintiffs’ notice to admit, deemed plaintiffs’ request for relief to constitute a motion, and as such, granted plaintiffs’ cross motion to offer into evidence certain deposition testimony at trial, unanimously dismissed, without prejudice to a motion by the defendants to reinstate the appeals, without costs.

On a prior appeal (161 AD2d 129), this court reversed the IAS court’s denial of the defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment, and dismissed all claims in the complaint raised under the Jones Act (46 USC § 688) as well as the general maritime law of the United States. The instant appeals, which concern the use of the deposition testimony of deceased persons, previously party defendants, taken in a different action, are therefore moot, since use of the depositions was permitted for the purpose of establishing Jones Act jurisdiction under *Hellenic Lines v Rhoditis*(398 US 306). Moreover, it appears that the only remaining cause of action, for maintenance and cure, has already been fully tried. Dismissal of these appeals is without prejudice to a motion to reinstate should the order of this court in the prior appeal *(supra)*be modified or reversed. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.
#### Joyce R. KAUFFMAN, Respondent, v. Richard W. KAUFFMAN, Appellant.

No. WD40506.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 15, 1988.

James D. Boggs, Kansas City, for appellant.

Wm. Dick Fickle, Platte City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, J.P., and TURNAGE and COVINGTON, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard W. Kauffman appeals from an order awarding Joyce R. Kauffman forty percent of Mr. Kauffman’s military retirement benefits retroactively with interest thereon. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10976]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Intelligence Agency Joint Military Intelligence College 
Board of Visitors; Meeting

agency: Defense Intelligence Agency Joint Military Intelligence 
College.

action: Notice of Closed Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Joint Military 
Intelligence College Board of Visitors has been scheduled as follows:

dates: Monday, 10 June 1996, 0900 to 1700; and Tuesday, 11 June 1996, 
0830 to 1530.

addresses: The DIAC, Washington, DC.

for further information contact: Mr. A. Denis Clift, President, DIA 
Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100 (202/
231-3344).

supplementary information: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(1), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed. The Board will 
discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the 
Director, DIA, as to the successful accomplishment of the mission 
assigned to the Joint Military Intelligence College.

    Dated: April 29, 1996.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-10976 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Infrastructure Investment
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      February 17, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Zhang ChunxianName:
                Zhang
      ChunxianTitle:
                Chief
      Financial Officer, Principal Financial andAccounting
      Officer and Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to China Infrastructure Investment Corporation
will be retained by China Infrastructure Investment Corporation and furnished to
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Samuel FRASURE, Employee-Respondent, v. LAWRENCE A. JONES MORTUARY, and Maryland Casualty Company, Employer/Insurer-Appellants.

No. WD 47552.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 5, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 30, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 25, 1994.

James A. Borthwick, Sally B. Surridge, Blackwell Sanders Matheny Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, for employer, insurer-appellant.

*539John Kurtz, Popham Law Firm, Kansas City, for employee-respondent.

Before TURNAGE, C.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which denied the workers’ compensation insurance carrier subrogation against employer’s uninsured motorists carrier.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5754 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5754

To designate the United States courthouse located at 350 W. 1st Street, 
 Los Angeles, California, as the ``Felicitas and Gonzalo Mendez United 
                          States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2023

  Mr. Gomez (for himself, Mr. Aguilar, Ms. Barragan, Ms. Caraveo, Mr. 
Carbajal, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Castro of Texas, Mr. Correa, Mr. Costa, Mr. 
Cuellar, Ms. Escobar, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Frost, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Garcia 
 of Illinois, Mr. Robert Garcia of California, Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of 
     Texas, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Leger Fernandez, Mr. Menendez, Mrs. 
Napolitano, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Ruiz, Ms. Salinas, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. 
   Soto, Mrs. Torres of California, Mrs. Trahan, Mr. Vargas, and Ms. 
  Velazquez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 350 W. 1st Street, 
 Los Angeles, California, as the ``Felicitas and Gonzalo Mendez United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los 
Angeles, California, shall be known and designated as the ``Felicitas 
and Gonzalo Mendez United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 2 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Felicitas and 
Gonzalo Mendez United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
Ex-10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     Pursuant to Section 5.3 of the he CT Communications, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is amended as set forth below, effective as of July 28, 2006:




	1.	 	The Plan is amended to add a new Section 12.5 thereto to read as follows:






“12.5 Stock Withholding




     To the extent the Award Agreement so provides, the payment of the Option Price
for shares of Stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an Option may be made, in
whole or in part, by directing the Company to withhold such number of shares of
Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Option equal in value to that portion of the
Option Price to be paid pursuant to the stock surrender provisions. The value of
the shares of Stock for purposes of determining the extent to which the Option Price
has been paid will be determined using the Fair Market Value on the date of
exercise.”




	2.	 	The Plan shall otherwise be unchanged by this Amendment No. 1.






	 	 	The foregoing Amendment No.1 was duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of CT
Communications, Inc. on July 28, 2006.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                    /s/ David H. Armistead
 	 
	 	Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of W. S.  INDUSTRIES,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending  November 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James F. Dempsey,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  respectively,  of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 29, 2006


/s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
___________________________
    James F. Dempsey
    Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Craig A. BARKSDALE, Appellant.

Nos. WD 44425, WD 45715.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 27, 1992.

J. Bryan Allee, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and SPINDEN and SMART, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Craig Barksdale appeals from the jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree, and also appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel.

The Judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).