alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10962]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


National Historic Landmarks Survey; Notification of Pending 
Nomination

    A nomination for National Historic Landmark designation for the 
EDWARD M. COTTER, Buffalo, New York, was received by the National Park 
Service before April 12, 1996. Pursuant to Section 65.5 of 36 CFR Part 
65, written comments concerning the significance of this property under 
the National Historic Landmarks criteria for evaluation may be 
forwarded to the National Historic Landmarks Survey, National Park 
Service, P.O. Box 37127, Suite 310, Washington, D.C. 20013-7127. 
Written comments should be submitted by [15 days after publication]. 
After this date, the nomination will be forwarded to the Secretary of 
the Interior for designation as a National Historic Landmark.
Rowland Bowers,
Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnership 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 96-10962 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Robyn L. Weber, Esq. 

Weber Law Firm 

221 5th Avenue 

Helena, MT 59601 

Te1. (406) 449-4433 

Robyn@weberlawhelena.com 

Attorney for Petitioner/Appellee 

KATIE MARIE THORNTON FILED 

AUG 7 0 2021 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE 

STATE OF MONTANA 

IN RE THE PARENTING PLAN FOR: 

A.J.B., A Minor Child, 

KATIE MARIE THORNTON, 

Petitioner/Appel lee, 

v. 

GREGORY STEVEN BALLARD, 

Respondent/Appellant. 

Cause No. DA 21-0168 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

Upon motion of the Petitioner/Appellee, KATIE MARIE THORNTON, by and through her 

counsel of record, Robyn L. Weber, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner/Appellee IS 

GRANTED an additional 30 days to prepare and file the Response Brief, up to and including 

September 27, 2021. 

SO ORDERED this .2._641-'\— day of August, 20 

c: Robyn Weber, Esq. 

Brian Miller, Esq. 

Clerk, Supreme Court 

ORIGINAL 

08/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0168
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1789

JAMES D. JACOBS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. RICHLAND COUNTY; RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF ’ S DEPARTMENT; LEON LOTT, individually and in his official capacity as Richland County Sheriff; DEPUTY JAMES GILBERT, individually and each in his Official capacity as Richland County Deputy Sheriff; DEPUTY RANDY DAVIS, individually and each in his Official capacity as Richland County Deputy Sheriff; DEPU TY JUSTIN MOODY, individually and each in his Official capacity as Richland County Deputy Sheriff , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Sherri A. L ydon , District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv - 03216

- SAL )

Submitted : July 23, 2021 Decided: August 13, 2021

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John Dwight Hudson, HUDSON LAW OFFICES, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellant. Andrew F. Lindemann , LINDEMANN & DAVIS, P.A ., Columbia, South Carolina; Robert D. Garfield, CROWE LAFAVE, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
James D. Jacobs appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Appellee s’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action . We have reviewed the r ecord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jacobs v. Richland Cnty. , No. 3:18

- cv - 03216

- SAL (D.S.C. June 23, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Form of  Amendment No.1 to Executive Termination Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of March {Date}, 2010 (this “Amendment”), to the Executive Termination Agreement
(the “Executive Termination Agreement”) between Millipore Corporation (the “Company”) and {Name} (the “Executive”), dated as of {Date}. 

WHEREAS, the Executive Termination Agreement provides for certain payments and benefits to the Executive upon certain terminations of
employment following a Change of Control (as defined in the Executive Termination Agreement), subject to certain conditions, as well as the Executive having complied with certain commitments; and 

WHEREAS, in order to enhance the retentive value of the Executive Termination Agreement, the Company desires to amend such agreement to
provide that while the Executive will remain obligated to use best efforts to bring about whatever result the Board of Directors of the Company determines to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders relative to any Impending
Change of Control (as defined in the Executive Termination Agreement) and to use best efforts at and after the occurrence of a Change of Control to effect an orderly transition of control to the acquiror, the receipt of severance payments and
benefits under the Executive Termination Agreement will not be subject to the Executive’s compliance with such covenants; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT: 
 RESOLVED, that, Section 7.01 of the Executive Termination Agreement is hereby amended to provide that
the words “Sections 3.01 and 3.02” are hereby replaced with “Section 3.01”. 
 Intending to be legally bound hereby,
the parties have executed this Amendment on the dates set forth next to their names below. 
  

									
	March {Date}, 2010	 		 	MILLIPORE CORPORATION,
				
		 		 	    by  	 	 
			
	March {Date}, 2010	 		 	EXECUTIVE,
				
		 		 	    by
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Thomas W. Colligan, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of YACHT FINDERS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 12th day of May, 2011.




/s/ Thomas W. ColliganThomas W. ColliganChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YACHT FINDERS, INC. and will be retained by YACHT FINDERS, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Prepared and filed by St Ives Financial



EXHIBIT 10.1

NEOWARE, INC.

Summary of Cash Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Effective January 1, 2007

     Effective
    as of January 1, 2007, the following sets forth the policy for cash compensation
    of non-employee directors: 

	
•	
Each non-employee member of the Board will receive an annual fee of $16,000 for services as a member of the Board, paid quarterly;


	
•	
Each non-employee director will receive $1,500 per Board meeting attended in person, $750 for each Board meeting attended telephonically and $500 for each committee meeting attended either in person or telephonically; 


	
•	
The chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an annual fee of $16,000, the chairman of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee will receive an annual fee of $6,000 and the chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee will receive an annual fee of $2,000, for his services during the 2007 fiscal year as chairman, paid quarterly; and


	
•	
The independent lead director will receive an annual fee of $10,000, paid quarterly.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioForce Nanosciences  Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Eric  Henderson,  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the  Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/S/   ERIC HENDERSON
--------------------------------
Eric Henderson
Principal Accounting Officer
May 15, 2006



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Kevin Cooksy, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Amended Annual Report (the Report) on Form 10-KSB/A-2 of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:May 23, 2007By:/s/Kevin CooksyKevin Cooksy, Secretary Treasurer
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition and results of the Company as of
and for the period covered by this Report.
 By:
    
    /s/ William J. McGurk

William J. McGurkPresident and Chief Executive
OfficerAugust 11, 2006By:
    
    /s/ Gregory A. WhiteGregory A. WhiteSVP, Chief Financial Officer
and TreasurerAugust 11, 2006
Exhibit 31.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Reed Birnbaum, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intermolecular, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: September 5, 2013/s/ Reed BirnbaumReed BirnbaumInterim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioForce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kerry M. Frey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kerry M. Frey

Kerry M. Frey

Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2008







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6730

GERALD DAVID DAVAGE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA03-709-JFM)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 4, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald David Davage, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gerald David Davage appeals the district court’s orders

denying his petition seeking to invoke the inherent power of the

court to vacate his convictions and sentence and denying his motion

for reconsideration. Although the district court denied Davage’s

petition on the merits, the court should have construed Davage’s

pleading as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and

dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction because Davage had not

obtained authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255

motion. We note that, when the district court denied relief, it

did not have the benefit of our decision in United States v.

Winestock, F.3d , 2003 WL 1949822 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2003).

Because the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider

Davage’s petition, we affirm the denial of relief on that basis.

Pursuant to Winestock, we construe Davage’s notice of appeal

and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or

successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In order to obtain

authorization to file a second § 2255 motion, a movant must assert

claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law,

previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to

cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence that

would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence

that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of

the offense. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 8. Davage’s claims do not satisfy
3

either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize

Davage to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CANAM URANIUM
      CORP.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Canam
      Uranium Corp., for the quarter ended April 30, 2007, the undersigned, Ryan
      Gibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Canam Uranium Corp., does
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended April 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Canam Uranium Corp.


Date: July
              23, 2007
            
            /s/ Ryan
              GibsonRyan
                GibsonPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 111 (Friday, June 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Pathway to Independence Awards (K99/R00).
    Date: July 7, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Erin E. Gray, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, NSC 
6152B, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8152, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b4e594245054c594a526b454243054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d485f4443034a5f4c546d434445034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 7, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12233 Filed 6-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VeriFone Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   By:
    
    /s/ Clinton Knowles

Clinton KnowlesInterim Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 9, 2008