alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**I, Gregg A. Waldon, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SoftBrands, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: d) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  e) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  f) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): c) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  d) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ GREGG A. WALDON   Gregg A. Waldon  *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*  February 14, 2007
#### Anthony COBBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64835.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 5, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 22, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 20, 1994.

*286David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Anthony Cobbs, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant had previously pleaded guilty to charges of second degree felony murder, attempted robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. Movant contends his counsel was ineffective because his counsel failed to adequately advise him of the nature of the case, the state’s evidence, and the movant’s defenses.

Our review is limited to determining whether the findings, conclusions, and judgment of the motion court are clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j); *Kelley v. State,*866 S.W.2d 879, 880 (Mo.App.E.D.1993). Movant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing only if: 1) he alleges facts which would warrant relief; 2) the allegations are not refuted by the record; and 3) the matters complained of resulted in prejudice to him. *Kelley,*866 S.W.2d at 880; *Brewer v. State,*823 S.W.2d 12 (Mo.App.1991).

Movant was asked extensive questions by the trial judge relating to his understanding of his rights, his satisfaction with his counsel, and movant’s criminal culpability. In each case, movant answered that he was satisfied with the representation he received and understood the consequences of his guilty pleas. Movant also testified that he did not enter his pleas of guilty because of any threats or promises.

Movant argues that the record supports his claim because he expressed confusion during the guilty plea proceeding about the term “armed criminal action”. After a brief conference with his counsel, however, movant testified that he understood the meaning of armed criminal action and also understood the other charges pending against him.

The motion court did not clearly err in finding movant’s claim was refuted by the record. Movant’s point is denied.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
WEST COAST BANCORP
2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 


     This AMENDMENT NO. 3 (the “Amendment”) to the WEST COAST BANCORP 2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (the “Plan”) is adopted effective September 27, 2006, by the Board of Directors of West Coast Bancorp, an Oregon corporation (the "Company").


     1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 10 of the Plan, the Plan is amended as follows: 


     (a) Section 3 of the Plan is amended by deleting the third paragraph of such section and replacing it in its entirety as follows: 


     In the event of a stock split (including a reverse stock split), a dividend or distribution paid in Common Stock, or a recapitalization of or affecting Common Stock, the aggregate number and kind of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan, the maximum limitation upon the number of shares that may be issued as Restricted Stock or subject to Stock Options to be granted to a single participant in any fiscal year under the Plan, the number, kind, and option price per share subject to each outstanding Stock Option, and the number and kind of shares subject to other Awards granted under the Plan, will automatically be adjusted proportionately, or substituted, to reflect the effect of such stock split, distribution paid in Common Stock, or recapitalization. 


     In the event of any merger or consolidation, separation (including a spin off), a reorganization (whether or not such reorganization comes within the definition of such term in Section 368 of the Code), any partial or complete liquidation, or any other change in corporate capitalization not specifically addressed above, the Committee or Board may make such adjustments or substitution in the aggregate number and kind of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan, the maximum limitation upon the number of shares that may be issued as Restricted Stock or subject to Stock Options to be granted to a single participant under the Plan, in the number, kind, and option price per share subject to outstanding Stock Options, in the number and kind of shares subject to other outstanding Awards under the Plan and/or such other equitable adjustments or substitutions as it may determine to be appropriate in its sole discretion.


     Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of shares subject to any Award shall always be a whole number which shall be obtained by rounding all calculations up to the nearest whole share.


     (b) Section 5 (d) of the Plan is amended by placing a period after the word "granted" in the eighth line of paragraph two of such section and deleting all language that appears thereafter (including "and provided, further, that such already owned shares have been held by the optionee for at least six months at the time of exercise or have been purchased on the open market"). 


-1-








     2. Except as amended hereby, all the terms and conditions of the Plan will remain in full force and effect. 


     3. The Plan is hereby restated to be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, which includes all amendments described above as well as other amendments approved since the Plan was originally adopted.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, May 14, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-11106 Filed 4-30-96; 3:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Warren, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford Scott, J.), rendered August 20, 1987, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 15 years to life, *8 Vs*to 25 years and 5 to 15 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly refused defendant’s request to charge the affirmative defense to felony murder. The defense failed to demonstrate that there was a reasonable view of the evidence that would have warranted a finding that defendant did not "solicit, request, command, importune, cause or aid” the homicidal act, or that defendant had no reasonable ground *362to believe that codefendant intended to engage in conduct likely to result in death or serious physical injury (Penal Law § 125.25 [3] [a]; *People v Moye,*66 NY2d 887, 889; *People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299, 301). Also devoid of merit is defendant’s argument that the evidence of his and codefendant’s prior commission of "punch robberies”, using an identical modus operandi, was improperly admitted. The probative value of such evidence, establishing their shared intent to rob and cause the death of the decedent, outweighed its potential for prejudice, and was not admitted for the sole purpose of demonstrating defendant’s criminal propensities *(People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 241; *People v Allweiss,*48 NY2d 40, 47; *People v Molineux,*168 NY 264, 293). Finally, defendant’s challenge to the court’s charge on his failure to testify is unpreserved as a matter of law and does not warrant review in the interest of justice (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Autry,*75 NY2d 836, 839; *People v Diggs,*151 AD2d 359, 361). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Benny NELSON, Appellant. Benny NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60040, 61525.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 19, 1993.

Elizabeth Haines, David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondént.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Benny Nelson (Defendant) appeals from his conviction and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.25(b). No error of law appears and Defendant’s post-conviction claim is refuted by the record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21182-21183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11561]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 21183]]

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Formations of, Acquisitions by, 
and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 96-8893) published on 
page15946 of the issue for April 10, 1996.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland heading, the entry for 
Croghan Bancshares, Inc., Fremont, Ohio, is revised to read as follows:
    1. Croghan Bancshares, Inc., Fremont, Ohio; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Union Bancshares Corp., Bellevue, Ohio, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Union Bank and Savings Company, Bellevue, 
Ohio.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 3, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-11561 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Whataburger Restaurants LLC, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

Rosa Elia Fuentes,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No.08-23-00017-CV

Appeal from the

57th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas 

(TC# 2022CI11371)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s first motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until February 14, 2023. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Karen L. Landinger, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 14, 2023

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of January, 2023.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TRX, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 21, 2007



/s/ Norwood H. (Trip) Davis, IIINorwood H. (Trip) Davis, IIIChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ David D. CathcartDavid D. CathcartChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 104 (Wednesday, June 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11567]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Actuarial Advisory Committee With Respect to the Railroad 
Retirement Account; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Public Law 92-463 that 
the Actuarial Advisory Committee will hold a virtual meeting on June 7, 
2021, at 9:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time) on the conduct of the 28th 
Actuarial Valuation of the Railroad Retirement System. The agenda for 
this meeting will include a discussion of the results and presentation 
of the 28th Actuarial Valuation. The text and tables that constitute 
the Valuation will have been prepared in draft form for review by the 
Committee. It is expected that this will be the last meeting of the 
Committee before publication of the Valuation.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Persons wishing to submit 
written statements, make oral presentations, or attend the meeting 
should address their communications or notices to Patricia Pruitt 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3161504543585258501f614344584545714343531f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9a9988d8b909a9098d7a98b8c908d8db98b8b9bd79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>) so that information on how to join the 
virtual meeting can be provided.

    Dated: May 27, 2021.
Stephanie Hillyard,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-11567 Filed 6-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Julie MAUL, A Minor, b/n/f Patricia Maul, Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Respondent.

No. 67334.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 11, 1995.

James C. Ochs, Schwartz & Ochs, St. Louis, for appellant.

James E. Whaley and Kenneth M. Burke, Brown & James, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Julie Maul, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Bi-State Development Agency, in an action for personal injuries she sustained when struck by an automobile after disembarking from defendant’s bus.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, set*369ting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Datrek Miller International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick B. Fox, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: April 22, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Patrick B. Fox         
|                     |  |     |  | Patrick B. Fox             
|                     |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              David Salzman                                                                                                                                            |   |   |        |
| David                SalzmanChief                Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit                Corp., Manager of the RegistrantMarch                12, 2008 |   |   |        |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5661 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5661

  To amend the microloan program of the Small Business Act to define 
                     State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

 Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mrs. Radewagen) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the microloan program of the Small Business Act to define 
                     State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Mariana Islands 
Entrepreneurship Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. MICROLOAN PROGRAM; DEFINITIONS.

    Paragraph (11) of section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(m)(11)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C), by striking 
        ``rural'' and all that follows through the end of the clause 
        and inserting ``rural;'';
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) the term `State' means each of the several 
                States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of 
                Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, 
                Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 
                and American Samoa.''.
                                 <all>
```