19920 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 87 / Friday, May 3, 1996 / Notices

Panhandle and Trunkline state that

the Refund Report sets forth

Panhandle’s refund obligation to

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia) for production related costs

and that payment to Columbia was

made on March 28, 1996.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests should be

filed on or before May 6, 1996. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Pubic Reference Room.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–11062 Filed 5–2–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP96–214–000]

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line

Company; Notice of Proposed

Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 29, 1996.

Take notice that on April 24, 1996,

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company

(Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of

its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised

Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on

Appendix A attached to the filing,

proposed to be effective May 25, 1996.

Panhandle asserts that the purpose of

this filing is to comply with the

Commission’s orders issued September

28, 1995 and February 29, 1996 in

Docket No. RM95–3–000.

Panhandle states that the purpose of

this filing is to bring it FERC Gas Tariff

into compliance with the Commission’s

updated Regulations as set forth in

Order No. 582 (Final Rule) and Order

No. 582–A (Final Rule; Order on

Rehearing) issued September 28, 1995

and February 29, 1996 respectively, in

Docket No. RM95–3–000, Filing and

Reporting Requirements for Interstate

Natural Gas Company Rate Schedules

and Tariffs. Specifically, Panhandle is:

(1) Adding its telephone and facsimile

numbers, as well as street address on

the title page; (2) expanding the table of

contents to include individual sections

of the General Terms and Conditions

and the table of contents for Original

Volume No. 2; (3) providing an updated

system map showing zone boundaries

and a separate map for each zone; (4)

rearranging rate sheet components to

show adjustments approved pursuant to

Subpart E of the Regulations in a

separate column; (5) including a

statement describing the order in which

Panhandle discounts its rates; and (6)

updating references to Part 154 of the

Regulations.

Panhandle states that a copy of this

filing is being served on all affected

customers and applicable state

regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest this filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.214 and 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such motions or protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–11064 Filed 5–2–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. RP91–203–061 and RP92–132–

048; Phase II—PCB Issues]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;

Notice of Compliance Filing

April 29, 1996.

Take notice that on April 24, 1996,

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of

its Fifth Revised FERC Gas Tariff,

Volume No. 1, the following tariff

sheets, with the effective dates as

indicated:

First/Substitute First/Sheet No. 301 (Effective

July 1, 1995)

Third Revised Sheet No. 301 (Effective May

3, 1996)

First Revised Sheet No. 407 (Effective May 3,

1996)

Tennessee states that this filing is

intended to supplement Tennessee’s

March 18, 1995 Initial Filing in this

proceeding for the sole purpose of

changing the Article number that is

assigned to the ‘‘PCB Adjustment’’

provision in the General Terms and

Conditions of Tennessee’s tariff.

Any person desiring to protest with

reference to said filing should file a

protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street

NE., Washington, DC 20426, in

accordance with Section 211 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211. All such

protests should be filed in accordance

with Section 154.210 of the

Commission’s Regulations. Protests will

be considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to this proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file and

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–11051 Filed 5–2–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. OR96–12–000]

Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Citgo Products

Pipeline Company and Williams Pipe

Line Company; Notice of Complaint

April 29, 1996.

Take notice that on April 19, 1996,

Total Petroleum, Inc. (Total) filed a

complaint pursuant to section 13(l) of

the Interstate Commerce Act (ICA),

section 1803 of the Energy Policy Act of

1992, and Rule 206 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure against

Citgo Products Pipeline Company

(Citgo) and Williams Pipe Line

Company L.P. (Williams) in the abovereferenced docket.

Total alleges that Citgo has proposed

major changes to its proration policy

without first seeking approval of such

changes through amendment of its tariff,

and that this is a violation of section 6

of the ICA. Total further alleges that the

new proration policy and the timing of

the change is unduly preferential

toward certain shippers, including

Citgo’s affiliate, Citgo Petroleum

Corporation. Total further asserts that

the proposed change has reduced the

capacity on Citgo that Total can reliably

obtain from approximately 200,000

barrels per month to 53,000 barrels per

month. To avoid the resulting reduction

in its nominations, Total requests the

Commission to take immediate action

directing Citgo to cease and desist from

implementing its new proration policy

and to return to its pre-existing policy

until lawfully changed.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest the instant complaint should file

a motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 214

and 211 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure. All such