ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

GREG ABBOTT 

December 13,2005 

The Honorable Tim Curry 

Tan-ant County Criminal District Attorney 

Justice Center 

401 West Belknap 

Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0201 

Opinion No. GA-038 1 

Re: Pretrial release practices in a county subject 

to chapter 1704 of the Occupations Code, which 

governs bail bond sureties (RQ-0352-GA) 

Dear Mr. Curry: 

You ask several questions about pretrial release practices in a county subject to chapter 1704 

of the Occupations Code, which governs bail bond sureties.’ 

Under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a person accused of a crime may be permitted 

to make bail, which is security that the person will appear before the proper court and answer the 

accusation. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 17.01 (Vernon 2005). Bail under the Code of 

Criminal Procedure includes bail bonds and personal bonds. See id. A bail bond is a written 

undertaking by a defendant and the defendant’s sureties, if any, guaranteeing the defendant’s 

appearance and answer. See id. arts. 17.02, 17.08. A defendant executing a bail bond may post 

money in the amount of the bond in lieu of obtaining a surety as a signatory on the bond. See id. art. 

17.02. Alternatively, at the court’s discretion, a person may post a personal bond that meets the 

requirements of a bail bond under article 17.08 except for the requirement of a surety. See id. arts. 

17.03(a), 17.04. 

To facilitate personal bonds, a county or multicounty judicial district “may establish a 

personal bond office to gather and review information about an accused that may have a bearing on 

whether he will comply with the conditions of a personal bond and report its findings to the court 

before which the case is pending.” Id. art. 17.42, 5 1. A court releasing a defendant on such a 

personal bond office’s recommendation may assess a personal bond fee, which may be used only to 

defray the personal bond office’s expenses. Id. art. 17.42, 5 4(a)-(b). 

Several of your questions concern the applicability of chapter 1704 of the Occupations Code 

to personal bonds and bail bonds secured by money in lieu of a surety. Chapter 1704 regulates bail 

‘See Letter from Honorable Tim Curry, Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney, to Honorable Greg Abbott, 

Texas Attorney General (June 10,2005) (on file with Opinion Committee, also available nt http:/lwww.oag.state.tx.us) 

[hereinafter Request Letter]. 
The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 2 (GA-038 1) 

bond sureties in counties with a population of 110,000 or more, such as Tat-rant County, or smaller 

counties that have created a bail bond board. See TEX. Oct. CODE ANN. $0 1704.001-.002 (Vernon 

2004).* A bail bond surety is “a person who . . , executes a bail bond as a surety or cosurety for 

another person; or . . . for compensation deposits cash to ensure the appearance in court of a person 

accused of a crime.” Id. 0 1704,001(2)(A)-(B). Chapter 1704 prohibits such sureties from soliciting 

business in a police station, a jail, a prison, or other detention facility. See id. 0 1704.304(c). Also, 

chapter 1704 prohibits persons such as deputies or jailers from recommending a particular bail bond 

surety. See id. 0 1704.304(b). Instead, in chapter 1704 counties, a “list of each licensed bail bond 

surety and each licensed agent of a corporate surety in a county must be displayed at each location 

where prisoners are examined, processed, or confined.” Id. 5 1704.105(b). See generally Tex. Att’y 

Gen. Op. No. GA-0089 (2003). 

Your first two questions concern the legality of posting signs in county detention facilities 

about a defendant’s alternatives to release on a bond executed by a surety. See Request Letter, supra 

note 1, at 2-3. You ask first whether a county may post signs in the county jail informing persons in 

custody about the availability of personal bonds administered by the personal bond office and 

providing the office’s telephone number. See id. at 2. Second, you ask whether the county may post 

similar signs informing persons in custody about a defendant’s option to execute a bail bond and 

deposit money in lieu of obtaining a surety’s signature on the bond. See id. at 3. Your main concern 

is that chapter 1704 of the Occupations Code may prohibit posting such signs. See id. at 2-3. As you 

note, a personal bond, a bail bond secured with money, and a bail bond executed’by a surety are all 

utilized by persons accused of a crime who seek release from confinement. See id. at 4. You state 

that a sign informing persons in custody about their alternatives to posting a bail bond executed by 

a surety arguably could be seen as the sheriffs or jail’s endorsement of those alternatives and might 

run afoul of Chapter 1704. See id. at l-2. 

As previously discussed, however, chapter 1704 is primarily a regulatory scheme for certain 

bail bond sureties. No sureties are required for a defendant to execute a bail bond secured by money 

or a personal bond. Moreover, the personal bond office does not execute bonds or otherwise act as 

a surety. Accordingly, chapter 1704’s prohibitions against surety solicitation or recommendation 

would not prevent a county from posting signs in the county jail informing persons in custody about 

personal bonds and the personal bond office or about bail bonds secured with money in lieu of a 

surety. See TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. 4 1704.304(b) (Vernon 2004) (prohibiting recommending a 

particular surety). 

You further ask whether such signs would constitute the unauthorized practice of law 

because they would inform individuals about legal options for pretrial release. The Government 

Code provides a definition of the practice of law: 

(a) In this chapter the “practice of law” means the 

preparation of a pleading or other document incident to an action or 

2See BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, U.S. DEP’T OF COMMERCE, 2000 Census of Population: Texas QuickFacts 

(population of Tarrant County is 1,446,2 I9), available at http:llquickfacts.census.gov/qfdlstatesi48l48439.html). 
The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 3 (GA-038 1) 

special proceeding or the management of the action or proceeding on 

behalf of a client before a judge in court as well as a service rendered 

out of court, including the giving of advice or the rendering of any 

service requiring the use of legal skill or knowledge, such as 

preparing a will, contract, or other instrument, the legal effect of 

which under the facts and conclusions involved must be carefully 

determined. 

(b) The definition in this section is not exclusive and does 

not deprive the judicial branch of the power and authority under both 

this chapter and the adjudicated cases to determine whether other 

services and acts not enumerated may constitute the practice of law. 

(c) In this chapter, the “practice of law” does not include the 

design, creation, publication, distribution, display, or sale, including 

publication, distribution, display, or sale by means of an Internet web 

site, ofwritten materials, books, forms, computer software, or similar 

products if the products clearly and conspicuously state that the 

products are not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. This 

subsection does not authorize the use of the products or similar media 

in violation of Chapter 83 and does not affect the applicability or 

enforceability of that chapter. 

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 0 8 1.101(a)-(c) (Vernon 2005). Because the definition in subsection (a) is 

not exclusive, courts may decide case by case what constitutes the practice of law. See Crain v. The 

Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm., 11 S.W.3d 328, 333 (Tex. App.-Houston [lst Dist.] 1999, 

pet. denied). Under the definition in section 8 1.101(a), the most pertinent question would be 

whether the information on the signs constitutes the rendition of legal advice. Generally, the practice 

of law includes “all advice to clients and all action taken for them in matters connected with the 

law.” See Crain, 11 S.W.3d at 333. 

We assume you envision signs that merely provide general information about personal bonds 

or bail bonds secured by a money deposit without suggesting whether they are appropriate in any 

particular circumstance. While the statutes and case law do not provide a definitive answer, we 

believe a court would conclude that a sign that generally describes the statutory provisions for release 

options and the functions of a personal bond office, without suggesting the suitability of any option 

to particular circumstances, does not provide legal advice and is not the unauthorized practice of law. 

Cf: TEX. DISCIPLINARY R. PROF’L CONDUCT 7.07(e)(l)(xi), (xiii), reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE 

ANN., tit. 2, subtit. G app. A (Vernon 2005) (exemption from advertising rules for publically 

available information such as news articles and law articles and for public service announcements). 

Additionally, a sign containing legal information may be considered “written materials” under 

Government Code section 81.101(c). The section provides a limited exception for “written 

materials” that state the information is not intended to substitute for the advice of an attorney. TEX. 

GOV’T CODE ANN. 4 8 1.101(c) (Vernon 2005). Consequently, in an abundance of caution, the 
The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 4 (GA-0381) 

county may wish to include a disclaimer on any signs concerning personal bonds or bail bonds that 

it decides to post. 

Your third question is whether, in light of opinion GA-0089, a county may post a sign in its 

jail that informs persons in custody of the right to make bail utilizing a surety bond and provides the 

telephone number of a surety bond referral service. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3; see 

generally Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0089 (2003). In that opinion we concluded that Occupations 

Code section 1704.304, which prohibits certain persons including the sheriff, a deputy, or a jailer 

from recommending a particular bail bond surety, does not allow such persons to recommend a short 

list of sureties. See id. at 3-4; see also TEX. Oct. CODE ANN. 9 1704.304(b) (Vernon 2004). 

Because you do not describe the bail bond referral service in any detail, we cannot give you a 

definitive answer. However, following the reasoning in GA-0089, section 1704.304(b) would 

prohibit posting the telephone number of a referral service if it is essentially a means for a sheriff, 

deputy, jailer, or other person to recommend a surety or group of sureties. Presumably the referral 

service’s telephone number would be posted in the countyjail with at least the sheriffs tacit consent. 

See de la Garza v. State, 579 S.W.2d 220, 222-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979) (discussing sheriffs 

authority concerning county jail operations). Depending on the facts, posting a referral service 

telephone number in a county jail may raise a question whether the sheriff is illegally recommending 

a surety or sureties. 

Moreover, such a sign is inconsistent with section 1704.105(b), which provides that “[a] list 

of each licensed bail bond surety and each licensed agent of a corporate surety in a county must be 

displayed at each location where prisoners are examined, processed, or confined.” TEX. OCC. CODE 

ANN. 6 1704.105(b) (Vernon 2004). Under the statute’s plain language, posting a sign with a referral 

telephone number does not satisfy the requirement to post a “list of each licensed bail bond surety 

. . . in a county.” Id. 3 1704.105(b). Thus, even assuming a sign posting the telephone number of 

a bail bond referral service is not an illegal referral, the county must still display a complete surety 

list as required under section 1704.105(b). 

Your fourth question is whether criminal judges’ authority under article 26.04 of the Texas 

Code of Criminal Procedure to promulgate rules for appointment of defense counsel for indigents 

authorizes them to order a city to post the signs discussed above in the city jail. See Request Letter, 

supra note 1, at 4. Article 26.04 provides in pertinent part that “[the] judges of the county courts, 

statutory county courts, and district courts trying criminal cases in each county, by local rule, shall 

adopt and publish written countywide procedures for timely and fairly appointing counsel for an 

indigent defendant.” TEX. CODE GRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). You note 

that there is “a real world relationship between pretrial freedom and the ability to afford counsel.” 

Request Letter, supra note 1, at 4. However, the right to make bail and the right to an attorney are 

distinct rights. See TEX. CONST. art. I, $ 10 (concerning the right to counsel); see id. art. I, 8 11 

(concerning the right to bail). Article 26.04 suggests that indigent defense and bail are separate 

matters when it states that “[tlhe procedures and standards [for appointing indigent defense] shall 

apply to each defendant in the county equally, regardless of whether the defendant is in custody or 

has been released on bail.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(l) (Vernon Supp.2004-05). As 

a matter of statutory construction, article 26.04 does not expressly or implicitly authorize criminal 

judges to order city jails to post information about bail bond and personal bond alternatives. 
The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 5 (GA-038 1) 

Finally, you ask whether employees or agents of a personal bond office may interview 

persons in custody “in a city holding facility before the [persons] are processed and booked” for the 

“sole purpose of gathering the kind of information used to determine whether the [persons] would 

be suitable candidates for release on personal bond.” Request Letter, supra note 1, at 4. You state 

that the “interviews would be strictly voluntary, and undertaken with the consent and cooperation 

of city officials.” Id. We assume this question is prompted by your concern that a personal bond 

office may be subject to the Occupations Code’s prohibition of bail bond surety solicitation of 

business in police stations, jails, prisons, or other detention facilities. See TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. 

$ 1704.304(c) (Vernon 2004). Because the personal bond office does not function as a surety, 

section 1704.304(c) does not apply to it. Although legal issues may arise in specific circumstances, 

we are not aware of any general statutory provisions or common-law principles that would prohibit 

such interviews. 
The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 6 (GA-038 1) 

SUMMARY 

Chapter 1704 ofthe Occupations Code concerning certain bail 

bond sureties does not prohibit a county from posting signs in county 

detention facilities informing defendants about statutory provisions 

for executing a bail bond secured by money or a personal bond and 

further providing the telephone number of the personal bond office. 

A county may only post the telephone number of a bail bond referral 

service in county detention facilities if it can do so in a manner that 

does not constitute a prohibited referral under Occupations Code 

section 1704.304(b); such a sign would not satisfy the requirement 

to post a list of bail bond sureties in certain locations required by 

section 1704.105. Article 26.04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 

concerning indigent defense does not authorize judges of criminal 

courts to order cityjails to post signs concerning release on bail bonds 

and personal bonds. Generally, employees or agents of,a personal 

bond office may interview prisoners in a city holding facility for 

information gathering purposes on a voluntary basis. 

Very truly yours, 

BARRY R. MCBEE 

First Assistant Attorney General 

NANCY S. FULLER 

Chair, Opinion Committee 

William A. Hill 

Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee