alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                       105
<INVENTORY>                                     39,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,487
<SALES>                                         91,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,296
<CGS>                                           80,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,085
<INCOME-TAX>                                       372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       67
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Brooklyn Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregg J. Wagner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  June 29, 2011




/s/ Gregg J. Wagner


Gregg J. Wagner


President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial
condition and results of the Company as of and for the
period covered by this Report.
 By:
    /s/ William J. McGurkWilliam J. McGurkPresident and Chief Executive
OfficerNovember 10, 2008By:
    /s/ Gregory A. WhiteGregory A. WhiteSVP, Chief Financial Officer and
TreasurerNovember 10, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 1941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1129]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the meeting of the National Cancer 
Institute Board of Scientific Advisors Cancer Centers Program Working 
Group, January 24-25, 1996 at the Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda 
Metro Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
    This meeting will be open to the public on January 24, from 8:00 am 
to 1:30 pm for overview and discussion of the Institute's Cancer 
Centers Extramural Program.
    The meeting will be closed to the public on January 24, from 1:30 
pm to approximately 7:00 pm and on January 25 and 8:30 am to 
adjournment for discussion of confidential issues relating to the 
review, discussion and evaluation of individual programs and programs 
and projects conducted by the Cancer Centers Extramural Program. These 
discussions will reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, 
the competence of individual investigators and similar matters, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Information pertaining to the meeting may be obtained from Dr. 
Paulette Gray, Executive Secretary, National Cancer Institute Board of 
Scientific Advisors, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
EPN, Rm. 600, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301-496-4218). Individuals who plan 
to attend and need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations should contact Dr. 
Paulette Gray in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: January 18, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-1129 Filed 1-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that: 

 

1. Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: January 27, 2006 

 

 

46
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that th i s

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

June 4, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30900

Summary Calendar

NORMAN VAN COURT, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, New Orleans Local # 83;

AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 03-CV-1670-K

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Norman Van Court, Jr., appeals the district court’s grant

of the defendants’ F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 12 (b)(6) motion to dismiss his

suit for failure to state a claim. Van Court argues that the

district court erred in determining that his state-law claims were

preempted and that his suit was not timely filed. We conduct a

de novo review of a district court’s dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)2

for failure to state a claim. B rown v. NationsBank Corp.

, 188 F.3d

579, 585 (5th Cir. 1999).

T he district court did not err in determining that

Van Court’s s tate-law claims were preempted by federal law.

Because Van Court’s claims arise from his allegation that the

defendants failed to diligently prosecute his grievan ce, these

claims are best construed as asserting that the defendants breached

the duty of fair representation (DFR) that they owed to Van Court.

See Landry v. The Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co.

, 880 F.2d 846,

852 (5th Cir. 1989); s ee also McNair v. U.S. Postal Servi ce , 768

F.2d 730, 735 (5th Cir. 1985). A DFR claim arises under federal

law a nd preempts state-law claims. S ee Richardson v. United

Steelworkers of America , 864 F.2d 1162, 1166-67 (5th Cir. 1989).

Further, the resolution of Van Court’s claims necessarily

involves an analysis of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA).

A state-law claim is preempted by federal law when, as here,

resolution of the claim is “inextricably intertwined with”

consideration of the terms of a CBA. See Thomas v. LTV Corp. , 39

F.3d 611, 616-17 (5th Cir. 1994). Thus, Van Court’s state-law

claims are preempted both because they arise from an alleged breach

of the DFR and because resolution of these claims involves analysis

of the CBA.

The district court also did not err in determining that

Van Court’s suit was untimely. S ee Smith v. Int’l Org. of Masters,

Mates, and Pilots

, 296 F.3d 380, 382 (5th Cir. 2002). The fact3

that Van Court chos e not to sue his employer does not preclude

application of the six-month statute of l imitations announced in

DelCostello v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters

, 462 U.S. 151, 172, (1983),

to his suit. See Smith , 296 F.3d at 382.

Van Court has shown no error in the district court’s

judgment. Accordingly, that judgment is AFFIRMED

.
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Michael W. Overby, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triton Distribution Systems,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.









Date:
      August 14, 2008
            By:/s/ Michael W.
      OverbyMichael
      W. OverbyChief Financial
      Officer
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Terry G.
Roussel and Sharon C. Kaiser, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his and her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of
Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three-month period
ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of  Cornerstone Core Properties
REIT, Inc.





/s/
      TERRY G. ROUSSELDate:
      November 15, 2010
                  Terry
      G. RousselChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)





/s/
      SHARON C. KAISERDate:
      November 15, 2010
                  Sharon
      C. KaiserChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
#### ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS, INC. and Gene Hempel, Relators, v. The Honorable Anne Ashby PACKER, District Judge, 134th Judicial District, Respondent.

No. D-4005.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Sept. 10, 1993.

Arthur K. Smith, Dallas, for relators.

Randall R. Kucera, Mark L. Johansen, Leonard A. Hirsch, David H. Harper and Rodger I. Kohn, Dallas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding Re-lators, Academy of Model Aeronautics, Inc. (AMA) and Gene Hempel, seek a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate an order appointing and referring all discovery matters to a master.

In the underlying cause of action, Sport Flyers Association, Inc. (SFA), an association of remote control model airplane fliers, sued AMA, a competitor association, and six individual defendants alleging that AMA and the individual defendants made false statements concerning the insurance coverage SFA provided to its members. AMA counterclaimed asserting similar claims against SFA. Both SFA and AMA seek injunctive relief as well as monetary damages. On SFA’s motion, the trial court appointed a special master to hear all pending and future discovery matters. At the time the motion to appoint a master was heard, there were four pending discovery motions, the earliest of which had been filed December 18, 1992. A fifth discovery motion had been heard by a visiting judge. The record reveals that without having ever heard or considered any discovery matter pending in this action, the trial court entered a blanket order appointing a master and referring all pending and future discovery matters to the master.

In accordance with our decision in *Simpson v. Canales,*806 S.W.2d 802 (Tex.1991), we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in entering the order referring all pending and future discovery matters to a master. Pursuant to Rule 122 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and without hearing oral argument, a majority of this court conditionally grants Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We are confident that Respondent will promptly vacate the order appointing a master. A writ of mandamus will issue only if she does not.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350  (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, David C. Karlgaard, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the
best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):



|Date: March 16, 2005 |  | /s/DAVID C. KARLGAARDName: David C. Karlgaard
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall also not be deemed incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
7, 2004  except for Note 17, as to which the date is March 4, 2004,  relating to
the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Q  Comm  International,  Inc.  and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 2003, and for the periods then ended, appearing in
the company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003,
in the Company's  Registration  Statements on Form S-8, SEC File No.  333-38362,
333-57502 and 333-43450, and on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-106907.


/s/ PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.

Salt Lake City, Utah
March 11, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Propex Fabrics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Edmund A. Stanczak , Jr.         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2005                    
|                                     
|/s/ Philip D. Barnes                 
|Chief Financial Officer              
|November 14, 2005
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jackie WOODSON, Appellant.

No. WD 52498.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 24, 1996.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was jury-convicted of second degree assault and endangering the welfare of her child. She received seven and five-year sentences to be served consecutively. She raises these points: court erred in 1) admitting the testimony of a social worker; and 2) admitting photographs depicting the child’s burns. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Kong Xiao Jun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Trafalgar Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2018, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trafalgar Resources, Inc.    Date:  May 24, 2019By:/s/ Kong Xiao JunKong Xiao JunChief Executive Officer & Principal Accounting Officer