22050 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices

Consent Agenda—Hydro, 652nd Meeting—May 15, 1996 Regular Meeting (10:00 a.m.)—Continued

CAG–36. DOCKET# CP95–755 ................................................ 000 MISSOURI GAS ENERGY, A DIVISION OF SOUTHERN

UNION COMPANY V. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE

LINE COMPANY

CAG–37. DOCKET# CP96–131 ................................................ 000 CENTANA INTRASTATE PIPELINE COMPANY

OTHER#S CP96–122 ................................................ 000 TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION

CAG–38. DOCKET# MT95–7 ................................................... 000 NORTHWEST PIPELINE CORPORATION

HYDRO AGENDA

H–1. RESERVED

ELECTRIC AGENDA

E–1. RESERVED

OIL AND GAS AGENDA

I. PIPELINE RATE MATTERS

PR–1. RESERVED

II. PIPELINE CERTIFICATE MATTERS

PC–1. RESERVED

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–12023 Filed 5–09–96; 11:13 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP96–348–000, et al.]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company, et

al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings

May 7, 1996.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Colorado Interstate Gas Company

[Docket No. CP96–348–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1996,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG),

P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs,

Colorado 80944, filed in Docket No.

CP96–348–000 a request pursuant to

Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.211) for authorization to construct a

new delivery facility under CIG’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP83–21–000 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

CIG proposes to construct and operate

the delivery facility in Sherman County,

Texas. The facility will be constructed

pursuant to a facilities agreement

between CIG and Amarillo Natural Gas

Inc. (Amarillo) wherein CIG will tap its

20-inch main line with a 3/4 inch tap

and valve for the delivery of gas to

Amarillo. The estimated cost of

construction is $1,100. The quantity of

gas to be delivered is approximately 400

Dth per day on an interruptible basis.

CIG states that the gas will be

transported for Amarillo for delivery to

a feedlot to be used to process feed.

CIG states that this new delivery

facility is not prohibited by its existing

tariff and that it has sufficient capacity

to accomplish deliveries without

detriment or disadvantage to other

customers. The proposed delivery

facility will not have an effect on CIG’s

peak day and annual deliveries and the

total volumes delivered will not exceed

total volumes authorized prior to this

request.

Comment date: June 21, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

2. Williams Natural Gas Company

[Docket No. CP96–373–000]

Take notice that on April 30, 1996,

Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG),

P.O. Box 2400, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74102,

filed in Docket No. CP96–373–000 a

request pursuant to Sections 157.205,

and 157.212(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, and 157.212) for

approval to install and operate a tap,

measuring and appurtenant facilities for

the delivery of transportation gas to City

Utilities of Springfield (City Utilities) in

Christian County, Missouri, under the

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP82–479–000, pursuant to Section 7(c)

of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as

more fully set forth in the request which

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

WNG states that the facilities for

which it seeks construction

authorization are designed to

accommodate delivery volumes at ant

level between 3,500 Dth per day and

125,000 Dth per day. It is indicated that

there will be no increase in peak

deliveries to City Utilities beyond that

requested in Docket No. CP95–700–000.

It is further indicated that the estimated

cost of construction is $499,737, which

will be fully reimbursed by City Utilities

to WNG.

WNG indicates that the proposed

construction is not prohibited by its

existing tariff and that WNG has

sufficient capacity to accomplish the

deliveries without detriment or

disadvantage to its other customers.

Comment date: June 21, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

[Docket No. CP96–402–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1996,

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston,

Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. CP96–

402–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to replace an

existing delivery point in Middlesex

County, Massachusetts under

Tennessee’s blanket certificate issued in

Docket No. CP82–413–000 pursuant to

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as

more fully set forth in the request that

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

Tennessee proposes to replace an

existing delivery point in Middlesex

County, Massachusetts to accommodate

increase natural gas deliveries to

Commonwealth Gas Company

(Commonwealth). Commonwealth has

requested that Tennessee amend the

maximum daily delivery quantities

under Commonwealth’s rate schedule

FT-A service agreement to shift primary

firm capacity rights from

Commonwealth’s Worchester delivery

point to the Hudson-Commonwealth

delivery point. Tennessee states that the

requested changes will not increase the

overall firm transportation quantity

under Commonwealth’s Rate Schedule

FT–A Service Agreement.

In order to increase the measurement

capability at this point, Tennessee

indicates that it will remove certain

existing measurement, interconnecting
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices 22051

and appurtenant facilities and install

dual 6-inch orifice meter tubes, an 8-

inch tie in assembly and approximately

150 feet of 8-inch interconnecting pipe.

Commonwealth will install the

regulation facilities. Tennessee states

that it will be fully reimbursed for the

cost associated with the replacements at

this facility.

Tennessee states that the total

quantities to be delivered will not

exceed those quantities authorized prior

to this request. Tennessee states that the

replacement of the proposed delivery

point is not prohibited by Tennessee’s

tariff, and that it has sufficient capacity

to accomplish deliveries without

detriment or disadvantage to any of

Tennessee’s other customers.

Comment date: June 21, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

4. Columbia Gulf Transmission

Company

[Docket No. CP96–429–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1996,

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company

(Columbia Gulf), 2603 Augusta STE 125,

Houston, Texas 77057–5637, filed in

Docket No. CP96–429–000, a request

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and

157.211 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for

authorization to establish a new

interconnection to provide

transportation service to Central

Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.

(CLECO) in Evangeline Parish,

Louisiana, under Columbia Gulf’s

blanket authorization issued in Docket

No. CP83–496–000, pursuant to Section

7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more

fully set forth in the request which is on

file with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Columbia Gulf explains that this new

interconnection has been requested by

CLECO to serve Coughlin Power Plant.

Columbia Gulf estimates the quantities

of natural gas to be delivered at the new

interconnection as 85,000 Dth per day

and 6 Bcf annually. Columbia Gulf

states that the transportation service to

be provided to this interconnection will

be interruptible service under its Rate

Schedule ITS–1. Columbia Gulf states

there will be no impact on its existing

design day and annual obligation to its

customers as a result of this new

interconnection.

Columbia Gulf estimates the cost to

construct the new interconnection to be

approximately $186,000, and states that

CLECO will reimburse Columbia Gulf

100% of the total cost of construction.

Columbia Gulf states it will comply

with all of the environmental

requirements of Section 157.206(d) of

the Commission’s Regulations prior to

the construction of any facilities.

Comment date: June 21, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

5. Northern Natural Gas Company

[Docket No. CP96–451–000]

Take notice that on May 1, 1996,

Northern Natural Gas Company

(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street,

Omaha, Nebraska 68124–1000, filed in

the above docket, a request, pursuant to

Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act, for authorization to

upgrade the Crosby #4 town border

station (TBS), an existing delivery point

located in Crow Wing County,

Minnesota, to accommodate incremental

interruptible natural gas deliveries to

UtiliCorp United, Inc. (UCU) under

Northern’s blanket certificate issued in

Docket No. CP82–401–000 pursuant to

Section 7 of the NGA, all as more fully

set forth in the request that is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Specifically, Northern states that it

requests authorization to upgrade an

existing delivery point in Minnesota to

accommodate incremental interruptible

natural gas deliveries to UCU under its

currently effective throughput service

agreements. Northern further states that

UCU has requested increased service at

the Crosby #4 TBS to provide increased

service to an industrial end-user.

Northern states that the proposed

increase in volumes to be delivered to

UCU at the Crosby #4 TBS are an

incremental 49 MMBtu on a peak day

and 32,618 MMBtu on an annual basis.

Northern’s estimated cost of upgrading

the existing delivery point is $29,250.

UCU will reimburse Northern for the

total cost of upgrading the existing

delivery point.

Northern states that the total volumes

to be delivered to the customer after the

request do not exceed the total volumes

authorized prior to the request.

Northern further states that the

proposed activity is not prohibited by

its existing tariff and that it has

sufficient capacity to accommodate the

changes proposed herein without

detriment or disadvantage to its other

customers.

Comment date: June 21, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

6. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline

Company

[Docket No. CP96–485–000]

Take notice that on May 3, 1996,

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline

Company (Williston Basin), Suite 300,

200 North Third Street, Bismarck, North

Dakota 58501, filed in Docket No. CP96–

485–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.211 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.211) for authorization to continue

the present operation of a previously

installed tap located in Butte County,

South Dakota under Williston Basin’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP83–1–000 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

Williston Basin states that due to a

request by Montana-Dakota Utilities

Company (Montana-Dakota), a local

distribution company, to commence

transportation deliveries of natural gas

through the subject tap to an end-user,

it is necessary to state separately this

delivery point on its master delivery

point list. Williston Basin states that the

continued operation of the subject tap

will have no significant effect on its

peak day or annual requirements and

capacity has been determined to exist

on Williston Basin’s system to serve this

natural gas market.

Comment date: June 21, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

7. El Paso Natural Gas Company

[Docket No. CP96–487–000]

Take notice that on May 3, 1996, El

Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso),

P.O. Box 1492, El Paso, Texas 79978,

filed in Docket No. CP96–487–000 a

request pursuant to Sections 157.205

and 157.212 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for

authorization to operate certain existing

delivery points under El Paso’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

435–000 pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

El Paso proposes to establish as

jurisdictional delivery points certain tap

and meter facilities that were originally

constructed for the nonjurisdictional

delivery of fuel and lift gas to various

field operations in the Permian Basin, as

listed below. El Paso would now like to

use these delivery points to provide gas

deliveries to various operators under

transportation service agreements.
22052 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 93 / Monday, May 13, 1996 / Notices

Delivery point Location

Sid Richardson Keystone Field Plant

Fuel Delivery Point.

Winkler County,

Texas

Richardson-Bass

Plant Start-Up Fuel

Delivery Point.

Winkler County,

Texas.

West Texas Gathering Compressor

Fuel Delivery Point.

Winkler County,

Texas.

Blanket Gas at Jal

No. 4 Delivery

Point.

Lea County, New

Mexico.

SWEPI Terrell Plant

Emergency Fuel

Delivery Point.

Terrell County, Texas.

Spraberry Lift Gas

No. 1 Delivery

Point.

Midland County,

Texas.

Spraberry Lift Gas

No. 11 Delivery

Point.

Midland County,

Texas.

Meyers LM Water

Flood Unit Delivery

Point.

Lea County, New

Mexico.

Comment date: June 21, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after the

issuance of the instant notice by the

Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214

of the Commission’s Procedural Rules

(18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene

or notice of intervention and pursuant

to Section 157.205 of the Regulations

under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR

157.205) a protest to the request. If no

protest is filed within the time allowed

therefore, the proposed activity shall be

deemed to be authorized effective the

day after the time allowed for filing a

protest. If a protest is filed and not

withdrawn within 30 days after the time

allowed for filing a protest, the instant

request shall be treated as an

application for authorization pursuant

to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–11873 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of January

1 Through January 5, 1996

During the week of January 1 through

January 5, 1996, the appeals and

applications for exception or other relief

listed in the Appendix to this Notice

were filed with the Office of Hearings

and Appeals of the Department of

Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of Jan. 1 through Jan. 5, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Jan. 2, 1996 ............ Charter/Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi RQ23–601 Application for a Second Stage Refund in the Charter, Amoco

II and Oklahoma City Refund Proceedings.

Oklahoma City/Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi.RQ251–602

Amoco II/Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi.RQ13–603 If granted: The second stage refund application submitted by

the State of Mississippi in the Charter, Amoco II and Oklahoma City Refund Proceedings would be granted.

Jan. 2, 1996 ............ Ellsworth Freight Lines, Inc., Memphis,

Tennessee.

RR272–228 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The December 7, 1995 Decision

and Order, Case No. RF272–97361, issued to Ellsworth

Freight Lines, Inc., regarding the firm’s application for refund submitted in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding would

be modified.

Do .................... Tajon, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee ........... RR272–229 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The December 21, 1995 Decision

and Order, Case No. RC272–325, issued to Tajon, Inc., regarding the firm’s application for refund submitted in the

Crude Oil Refund Proceeding would be modified.

Jan. 4, 1996 ............ Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico.VSO–0077 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at the Albuquerque Operations Office

would receive a hearing under 10 C.F.R. Part 710.

Do .................... Oakland Operations Office, Oakland,

California.

VSO–0078 Request for Hearing under CFR Part 710. If granted: An individual employed at the Oakland Operations Office would

receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

[FR Doc. 96–11912 Filed 5–10–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of January

15 Through January 19, 1996

During the week of January 15

through January 19, 1996, the appeals

and applications for other relief listed in

the Appendix to this Notice were filed

with the Office of Hearings and Appeals

of the Department of Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the