alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as
of May 17, 2010, by and between Cardiogenesis Corporation, a California corporation (the
“Company”) and Paul McCormick, an individual (the “Executive”).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are party to an Employment Agreement, dated as of July
1, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to amend the
Executive’s base salary effective July 1, 2010.



AGREEMENT




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby
agree as follows:



     1. Section 1(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:




	 	 	“Base Salary. For all of the services rendered by Executive hereunder,
Executive’s annual base salary shall be $250,000 until June 30, 2010 and $200,000
thereafter (as may be increased by the Board of Directors from time to time, the
“Base Salary”), payable in accordance with the Company’s ordinary payroll practices
(but in any event no less often than monthly). Such Base Salary shall not be reduced
during the term of this Agreement without the express written consent of Executive.
The Company agrees that Executive’s Base Salary and performance will thereafter be
reviewed at least annually by the Company to determine if an increase in
compensation is appropriate, which increase shall be in the sole discretion of the
Board of Directors of the Company.”





     2. Except as herein amended, all provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.



     3. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original and all of which shall constitute one instrument.



1









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the
date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	“COMPANY”


CARDIOGENESIS CORPORATION

 	 
	 	 	By: /s/ William Abbott	 
	 	 	William Abbott, Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	“EXECUTIVE”

 	 
	 	 /s/ Paul McCormick
 	 
	 	Paul McCormick
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 88 (Monday, May 6, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11173]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. Docket No. 94-ANE-56; Amendment 39-9513; AD 96-04-02]

Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Inc. ALF502L Series 
Turbofan Engine

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive 
(AD) 96-04-02 applicable to AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly Textron 
Lycoming) ALF502L series turbofan engines that was published in the 
Federal Register on February 29, 1996 (61 FR 7692). The AD number in 
the compliance section is incorrect. This document corrects the AD 
number. In all other respects, the original document remains the same.

DATES: Effective May 6, 1996.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final rule airworthiness directive 
applicable to AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly Textron Lycoming) ALF502L 
engines, was published in the Federal Register on February 29, 1996 (61 
FR 7692). The following correction is needed:
    On page 7693, in the middle column, in the Compliance Section 2., 
in the fourth line, ``94-04-02'' should read ``96-04-02.''

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on April 22, 1996.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 96-11173 Filed 5-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-116687) of PEC
Solutions, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

|March 16, 2005 |  | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. SER GIO B AR

AHONA, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10388

D.C . No. 4:13-c r-00450-JAS M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Jam e s Ala

n Soto, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . Se rgio B arahona

a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 4 8-m o nth se nte nc e im p ose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for ille ga l
re e n try a fte r de porta

tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C
. § 1326. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a n d we a ffirm
. 

# F IL ED JUN 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).B arahona c onte nds tha

t his se nte nc e is substa

ntive l y unre a s ona

b le ba se d on the s pe c ific fa c ts of his c a se , inc luding tha t he re turne d to theUnite d Stat e s to support a nd providehom e c are for his fa m ily . He a lso a

rgue s tha t the 16-le ve l
e nha nc e m e nt unde r U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) is disproportiona te ly ha rsh. The distric t c o urt im

pose d a downwa rd va rian c e of nine m onths from the a d visory Guide line s in c onside ra tion of the m itiga t ing fa c tors, a

nd did not a

buse its disc re tion in im

posing B a

rahona ’ s se nte nc e . S

e e Gall v . Unite d State

s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 48-m onth se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona b le in light of the 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c irc um sta

nc e s, inc luding B arahona ’ s c rim ina l history of dom e stic a

buse
. Se e Gall , 552 U.S. a t 51. AFFIRM E D.

1 4
- 1 0 3 8 8 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Infrastructure Investment
      Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the “ Report ”),
      Zhang
      Chunxian does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




*/s/
                Zhang Chunxian*Zhang
                ChunxianChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                15, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to China Infrastructure Investment Corporation and will be retained
      by
      China Infrastructure Investment Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




32.2-1
Order entered February 11 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00166
- CR
RAFAEL H. HERNANDEZ
- BLANCO, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 82676
- 08



### O RDER The Court has received appellant’s notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying him the relief sought by his article 11.072 application for writ of habeas corpus. This is an accelerated appeal under Tex as Rule of Appellate Procedure 31. The case information sheet filed by the Collin County District Clerk’s Office reflects that appellant is represented by
retained counsel.
We ORDER the Collin County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant has not paid for the record. The clerk’s record shall contain the trial court’s written order ruling on appellant’s article 11.072 application for writ of habeas corpus and t he trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. We notify appellant that if we receive verification of non

- payment,we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P.

37.3(b).
We ORDER Kim Tins ley, official court reporter of the 401st Judicial District Court, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either: (1) the reporter’s record of the December 17, 2014 hearing on appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus; or (2) writ ten verification that appellant has not paid for the reporter’s record. We notify appellant that if we receive verification of non

- payment, we will submit the appeal without the reporter’s record

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).
We ORDER appellant to file h is brief by MARCH 18, 2015 . We ORDER the State to file its brief by APRIL 8, 2015 . If any party does not file its brief by the date specified, the appeal will be submitted without that party’s brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 31.1. The appeal will be submitte d without oral argument on May 8, 2015 to a panel consisting of Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 31.2, 39.1.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Mark Rusch, P residing Judge, 401st Judicial District Court; Kim Tinsley, official court reporter, 401st Judicial District Court; Andrea Stroh Thompson, Collin County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5731 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5731

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to report on illicit drug use and 
    overdoses by members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2023

   Mr. Ryan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to report on illicit drug use and 
    overdoses by members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON ILLICIT DRUG USE AND OVERDOSES BY MEMBERS OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES SERVING ON ACTIVE DUTY.

    Not later than December 1, 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 
Representatives a report regarding illicit drug use by members of the 
Armed Forces serving on active duty, and monitoring and prevention 
systems within the Department of Defense regarding such use. The report 
shall include the following elements:
            (1) The number of instances of such drug use and overdoses 
        among such members during the calendar year preceding the date 
        of the report.
            (2) The number of instances described in paragraph (1) that 
        were related to fentanyl.
            (3) An explanation of how the Secretary uses urinalysis and 
        other tests to monitor such use, and an assessment of the 
        efficacy of such tests.
            (4) The extent to which fentanyl has contributed to such 
        overdoses when combined with other, less deadly substances.
            (5) The policies of the Department designed to prevent 
        retaliation against such members who seek treatment or inform a 
        commanding officer of their illicit drug use.
            (6) Demographic data and ranks of such members who suffered 
        a fentanyl overdose.
            (7) Shortcomings (including strategic or budgetary) 
        identified by the Secretary of the counternarcotics programs of 
        the Department regarding military installations.
            (8) A thorough review of the support and treatment options 
        offered to such a member who reports addiction or illicit drug 
        use, including--
                    (A) any wait time before receiving care; and
                    (B) the type of care offered across each Armed 
                Force.
            (9) Any other matter the Secretary determines appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
#### Frieda SIMMONS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Connie S. HOELSCHER, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 66912.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 10, 1995.

*383Thomas H. Lake, St. Louis, for appellant.

John H. Marshall, Bums *&*Marshall, Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on a juiy verdict awarding her $500.00 in damages in her action for personal injuries. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5892 

To designate the Federal building located at 985 Michigan Avenue in Detroit, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 3, 2023 

Ms. TLAIB (for herself, Mr. THANEDAR, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Ms. 

SCHOLTEN, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. WALBERG, Mrs. DINGELL, Ms. 

SLOTKIN, Mr. KILDEE, Mrs. MCCLAIN, Mr. JAMES, and Ms. STEVENS) 

introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 985 Michigan 

Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal 

Building’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROSA PARKS FEDERAL BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

5 985 Michigan Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known 

6 and designated as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5892 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

4 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rosa Parks 

5 Federal Building’’. 

6 (c) REPEALS.— 

7 (1) Public Law 109–98 (119 Stat. 2168) is re8 pealed. 

9 (2) Sections 1 and 2 of Public Law 109–101 

10 (119 Stat. 2171) are repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5807 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the energy credit 

with respect to microgrid controllers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 

Mr. PANETTA (for himself and Ms. TENNEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the energy credit with respect to microgrid controllers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making Imperiled 

5 Communities Resistant to Outages with Generation that 

6 is Resilient, Islandable, and Distributed Extension Act’’ 

7 or the ‘‘MICROGRID Extension Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5807 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF MICROGRID CONTROLLER ENERGY 

2 CREDIT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 48(c)(8)(C) of the Inter4 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘De5 cember 31, 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2032’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1289** 

In R e: JOSE NACACIO AMU, a/k/a Amu, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:97

- 40

- 11 , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 3:97

- cr - 00040

- FDW

- 11 )

Submitted : April 7, 2015 Decided: May 14, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jose Nacacio Amu, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jose Nacacio Amu petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). He seeks an order from this court directing t he district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently denied Amu’s motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782, and the court previously denied him a sentence reduction based on Amendment 7 50. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided
Amu’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and
arg ument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Motion Granted and Order filed May 26, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00569

- CR

____________ WALTER R SAM , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1419418



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motio n to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED

. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 337th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before June 10, 2016 ; that the2

clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that
date.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


In connection with the annual report of Tsingyuan Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mingxia Yuan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





April 13, 2011
/s/ Mingxia YuanMingxia YuanChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




LivePerson,
Inc.


New York,
New York




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-112019, 333-112018, 333-136249 and 333-147929) and Form S-8 (No.
333-34230, 333-147572 and 333-159850) of LivePerson, Inc. of our reports dated
March 10, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the
effectiveness of LivePerson, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting,
which appear in this Form 10-K.




/s/
      BDO Seidman, LLPNew
      York, New York
              March
      10, 2010
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AS REQUIRED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1.     | The                accompanying annual report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March                31,                2008 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | 2.     | The                information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of QPC                Lasers,                Inc.                                                             |

|                                               |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                  Jeffrey Ungar                 |   |   |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer        |   |   |   |
| (Principal                Executive Officer)  |   |   |   |
|                                               |   |   |   |
| May                15, 2008                        |   |   |   |

----