alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                      AGREEMENT DATED AS OF APRIL 27, 1999


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1999-3


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), Subservicer for BA Mortgage, LLC, successor in interest by merger
of NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), the Servicer in connection
with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-3, do hereby certify that
(i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year and of its performance under this Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made
under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under the
Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President



Inv M52
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9395]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Request Under Review by Office of Management and Budget

Acting Agency Clearance Officer: David T. Copenhafer, (202) 942-8800.
Upon written request copies available from: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and, Information Services, 450 Fifth 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20549.
Extension: Rule 15a-6, File No. 270-329.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission has submitted a request for extension of OMB approval to 
Rule 15a-6 [17 CFR 240.15a-6] under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 15a-6 provides, among other things, an exemption from broker-
dealer registration for foreign broker-dealers that effect trades with 
or for U.S. institutional investors through a U.S. registered broker-
dealer, provided that the U.S. broker-dealer obtains certain 
information about, and consents to service of process from, the 
personnel of the foreign broker-dealer involved in such transactions, 
and maintains certain records in connection therewith. It is estimated 
that approximately 2,000 respondents will incur an average burden of 
three hours per year to comply with this rule.
    Direct general comments to the Clearance Officer for the Securities 
and Exchange Commission at the address below. Direct any comments 
concerning the accuracy of the estimated average burden hours for 
compliance with the Commission rules and forms to David T. Copenhafer, 
Acting Director, Office of Information Technology, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20549 and 
the Clearance Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project number 
3235-0371, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.

    Dated: April 6, 1995.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9395 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel

. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited unde r the terms and conditions of Tenth Cir. R. 36.3. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/22/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

_____________ JAMES WALLACE WOLFE, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 96-7003 ) (D.C. No. CV-95-185) ) (E.D. Okl.) DOUGLAS GABBARD, III, District Judge, ) ) Defendants-Appellees. )

______________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

______________ Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

______________ After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff James Wallace Wolfe, a pro se inmate, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, contending the district court violated the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments by not conducting a post-competency determination hearing. Plaintiff sought injunctive relief, asking the district court to direct defendant Douglas Gabbard III, a state district judge, to conduct a post-competency hearing. Defendant moved to dismiss for insufficient service of process because the summons was2

not served with a copy of the complaint, and plaintiff personally mailed copies of the summons. The district court found that even if service was proper, plaintiff's action would fail. The court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding defendant was entitled to absolute immunity as a state district court judge, Van Sickle v. Holloway , 791 F.2d 1431, 1435 (10th Cir. 1986), and that federal courts have no authority to direct state courts in the performance of their duties, id . at 1436 n. 5. We have reviewed the briefs on appeal, the pleadings, and the district court's order, and have carefully examined the entire record on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, we find no reversible error and affirm the dismissal of plaintiff's action for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court's order.
AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Entered for the Court Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
#### Edmond SIMMONS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 61676.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 2, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 24, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied May 25, 1993.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for mov-ant/appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not cléárly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40388 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO ROBERTO FARFAN-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-652-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Roberto Farfan-Alvarez concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at June 30, 2000 and the
Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended June 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              56
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    56
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,794
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,313)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       531
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               298,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (298,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (298,263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (298,263)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Petramerica Oil, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Earnest Mathis, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                       /s/ Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                       -----------------------
                                       Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                       Chief Executive Officer, President
                                       and Chief Financial Officer

                                       November 14, 2005
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Maurice HARDIN, Appellant.

Nos. WD 49592, WD 51434.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 24, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Maurice Hardin, appeals from his conviction by a jury of second degree murder § 565.021, RSMo 1994 and armed criminal action § 571.015, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced as a persistent and class X offender to life imprisonment for the murder and sixty years imprisonment for the armed criminal action, the sentences to run consecutively. He appeals from his conviction and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Child Psychopathology and Developmental Disabilities Study Section, June 17, 2021, 09:00 a.m. to June 18, 2021, 08:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 20, 2021, 86 FR 27459. Kirk Thompson, Ph.D.,                     *Kirk.Thompson@nih.gov,*                     (240) 498-9897, will be the new Contact person, replacing Katherine Morasch as Scientific Review Officer. The meeting date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.                

Dated: June 3, 2021. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-12028 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5267 

To prohibit Federal funds from being awarded or otherwise made available 

to the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 25, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being awarded or otherwise 

made available to the Fulton County District Attorney’s 

Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Withholding Invest5 ments from Lawless Litigators In States Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘WILLIS Act’’. 

2 

•HR 5267 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING WITH RE2 SPECT TO FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTOR3 NEY. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING.—Notwith5 standing any other provision of law, no Federal funds may 

6 be awarded or otherwise made available to the Fulton 

7 County District Attorney’s Office. 

8 (b) RESCISSION AND REPAYMENT OF FEDERAL

9 FUNDING.—The unobligated balances of all amounts allo10 cated for or otherwise made available to the Fulton Coun11 ty District Attorney’s Office is hereby rescinded, and the 

12 Attorney General shall take such steps as may be nec13 essary and practicable to require the Fulton County Dis14 trict Attorney’s Office to reimburse the Federal Govern15 ment for all amounts expended for such Office after the 

16 date of January 1, 2021. 

Æ
ACCEPTED09-17-00300-CRNINTH COURT OF APPEALSBEAUMONT, TEXAS12/13/2017 9:31 AMCAROL ANNE HARLEYCLERKMOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FIEL APPELLEE'S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE COURT OFAPPEALS: Appellee, under Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure 38.6 (b), respectfully requests the Comito extend the time to file Appellee's Briefand would show the following:
1. Larry Wayne Duncan is the Appellant. The State ofTexas is the Appellee. 2. BobbyPhillips was appointed to represent Appellant in his appeal. 3. Lany Wayne Duncanwas found guilty ofFailure to Stop and Render Aidresulting in a death on June 7, 2016. 4. On January 12, 2017 Attorney Phillips filed a Writ ofHabeas Corpus requesting leave to file an out-of-time appeal which was granted on July 31, 2017. 5. On August 8, 2017 Attorney Phillips filed a Notice ofAppeal. 6. On October 27, 2017 Attorney Phillips filed Appellant's original brief. 7. On November 13,2017AttorneyPhillips filed a Motionto Amend Appellant's BriefDue to Minor Clerical Errors and the Amended BriefofAppellant.
28. Appellee's Briefwas then due December 13, 2017. 9. Since the date Appellant's Response Briefwas file, the State's appellate attorney has had a very busy caseload, including having trials set on December7, 2017 and other pending appellate matters with earlier deadlines. 10.Further, the State's appellate attorney had a death in the family and
was out oftown for a funeral on November 11, 2017. 11.As a result ofthe above, Appellee was unable to allot the necessary time to adequately complete Appellee's Brief. 12.Therefore, Appellee requests this Honorable Comito grant Appellee
a thirty (30) day extension oftime for the filing ofAppellee's Brief. 13. State's Attorney communicated with Attorney Phillips, attorney for Appellee, onDecember 11, 2017 and he stated that he had no objection to State's First Motion for Extension ofTime to File Appellee's Brief. 14.This is Appellee's first request for an extension oftime to file Appellee's Briefin this matter, making this the first request that has been made by Appellee.

315.Appellee requests this extension oftime not for the purpose ofdelay, but so thatjustice can be done and the matter properly presents to this Honorable Court.

4 RespectfullySubmitted ,

# ~~ CHRISTINA T. WOOD Assistant Criminal District Attmney San Jacinto County, Texas 1 State Hwy Rm# 21 Coldspring, Texas TBN:24081271 Phone: (936) 653-2601 Fax: (936) 653-2143CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to cettify that on this the 20 \( , a copy ofthe above and foregoing instrument was sent by U.S. Mail and via facsimile to: Bobby Phillips Appellate Counsel for Duncan 419 N. Washington Livingston, Texas 77351 Phone: (936) 327-5619 Fax: (936) 327-5610

5

# ~~ CHRISTINA T. WOOD Assistant Criminal District Attorney San Jacinto County, Texas 1 State Hwy Rm# 21 Coldspring, Texas TBN:24081271 Phone: (936) 653-2601 Fax: (936) 653-2143
**Exhibit** **32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of VisualMED Clinical Solutions Corp (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard Dab, Principal Executive Officer, Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | /s/      Gerard Dab |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Name:               | Gerard Dab |
|   | Title:              | Principal Executive Officer, Secretary and a       member of the Board of Directors       September 27,  2006 |

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of IFCO Systems N.V. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sections 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 25, 2003



/s/ KARL POHLERKarl Pohler Chief Executive Officer




In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of IFCO Systems N.V. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sections 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 25, 2003



/s/ MICHAEL W.
NIMTSCHMichael W. Nimtsch Chief Financial Officer




1