U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Venterea, Rodney

                                                         - *Rod*
  Submitted to: Meeting Abstract
                                    Publication Type: Abstract Only
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 6/6/2011
                                    Publication  Date: 6/7/2011
                                    Citation: Venterea, R.T. 2011. Effects of fertilizer source and placement depth on N oxide emissions and N use efficiency in an irrigated coarse-textured soil [abstract]. 2011 Air Quality Program Project Director's Meeting Proceedings. Abstract No. 2009-55112-05216, p. 26.Interpretive Summary:
                                Technical Abstract: Quantifying nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) fluxes from corn (Zea Mays L.) production fields under contrasting fertilizer regimes is essential for identifying ways of mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite the importance of anhydrous ammonia (AA) and urea as N fertilizer sources in the U.S., there have been relatively few side-by-side comparisons of their effects on GHG emissions, and none have been conducted in coarse-textured or irrigated soils. In addition, relatively few studies have evaluated agronomic performance together with environmental impacts. The objectives of this study were to compare N oxide emissions, grain yield, and N use efficiency (NUE) in a corn production system over two consecutive growing seasons on an irrigated loamy sand in central Minnesota that used three different fertilizer practices: AA that was injected at a conventional depth (0.20 m)(AAc) and at a shallower depth (0.12 m) (AAs), and urea that was broadcast and incorporated (IU). N oxide emissions were quantified on both an area- and yield-scaled basis, and were also converted to CO2 equivalents after accounting for potential off-site conversion of NO to N2O.  Different patterns were displayed for N2O and NO emissions: N2O emissions were 40% lower with IU than AAc and were more than twice as high with AAs than AAc, while NO emissions were twice as high with IU as AAc or AAs. Expressed as total N loss (NO + N2O) or as total CO2 equivalents, N oxide emissions increased in the order IU < AAc < AAs. There were no differences in grain yields among fertilizer treatments. However, while the AAs treatment had the greatest GHG emissions, it also used N more efficiently as evidenced by total above-ground crop N yields that were 14% greater than the AAc treatment. Thus, these results provide more evidence that AA can emit more N2O compared with urea, and they also demonstrate that higher NUE may not always correspond with reduced N2O emissions.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov