alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 112 (Monday, June 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12350]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-849]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Fisher Clinical 
Services, Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Fisher Clinical Services, Inc. has applied to be registered as 
an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before July 14, 2021. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before July 14, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
request for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on May 17, 2021, Fisher Clinical Services, Inc., 700A-C 
Nestle Way, Breinigsville, Pennsylvania 18031-1522, applied to be 
registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of 
controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Controlled substance           Drug code         Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana Extract....................       7350   I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the above controlled substance as 
finished dosage forms for clinical trials. No other activity for this 
drug code is authorized for this registration.
    Approval of permit applications will occur only when the 
registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized 
under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import 
of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished 
dosage forms for commercial sale.

William T. McDermott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-12350 Filed 6-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
---

Extension of the Loan Agreement between DAST GmbH and
Skyflyer Technology GmbH dated December 8, 2006





The loan agreement concluded between DAST GmbH and
Skyflyer Technology GmbH on December 8, 2006 is hereby extended until
December 31, 2007.



Wegberg, July 30, 2007

DAST GmbH
    Skyflyer Technology GmbHAusbildungsstätte für Schweisstechnik
    Friedrich-List-Allee 1041844 Wegberg-WildenrathFriedrich-List-Allee 10
    Tel. 02432/89362741844 Wegberg-Wildenrath
    Fax. 02432/899623Tel. 02432  893621Fax. 02432 - 899623[signature]
    [signature](Lender)
    (Borrower)


---
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT NO. 23.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-96119 of WRC Media, Inc. on Form S-4 of our report dated March 7, 2003,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of WRC Media, Inc. as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the Company's change it
its method of accounting for goodwill and other long lived intangible assets and
relating to the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures of
financial statement amounts related to the 2000 and 2001 consolidated financial
statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and
for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than
with respect to such disclosures appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
WRC Media, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                                IMAX CORPORATION
                                  Exhibit 10.29

Summary of Employment Arrangement
November 6, 2006

On August 21, 2006, IMAX Corporation (the "Company") announced the appointment
of Mr. Edward MacNeil, as Interim Chief Financial Officer. On November 6, 2006
the Company reached an arrangement with Mr. MacNeil. During his term as Interim
CFO, Mr. MacNeil will receive an annualized salary of Cdn$345,000. Under the
arrangement, Mr. MacNeil will receive a guaranteed bonus of Cdn$50,000 payable
in March 2007, in respect of the year ending December 31, 2006.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22082-22083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11883]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. M-015; OMB No: 2133-0024]


Information Collection Available for Public Comments and 
Recommendations

Action: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Maritime Administration's (MARAD's) intentions to 
request extension of approval for three years of a currently approved 
information collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before July 12, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael P. Ferris, Director Office of 
Costs and Rates, Maritime Administration, MAR-560, Room 8117, 400 
Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590. Telephone 202-366-2324 or 
fax 202-366-7901. Copies of this collection can also be obtained from 
that office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title of Collection: Subsidy Voucher - Operating - Differential 
Subsidy (Bulk & Liner Cargo Vessels).
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved information 
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2133-0024.
    Form Number: MA-790, SF-1034 and supporting schedules.
    Expiration Date of Approval: June 30, 1996.
    Summary of Collection of Information: The information collected is 
the costs and manning complement of bulk and liner cargo vessels 
engaged in carrying commodities in worldwide services and covered by an 
Operating-Differential Subsidy Agreeement (ODS) in accordance with 
Title VI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (Act).
    Need and Use of the Information: The information is utilized by 
MARAD examiners to determine subsidy payable for voyages performed in 
accordance with ODS agreements.
    Description of Respondents: Bulk and liner vessel operators of 
vessels covered by an ODS agreement under the Act.
    Annual Responses: 320.
    Annual Burden: 640 hours.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Joel C. Richard, Department of Transportation, Maritime 
Administration, MAR-120, Room 7210, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20590. Send comments regarding

[[Page 22083]]

whether this information collection is necessary for proper performance 
of the function of the agency and will have practical utility, accuracy 
of the burden estimates, ways to minimize this burden, and ways to 
enhance quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: May 8, 1996.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11883 Filed 5-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00322

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV

- 2021

- 03143

- JP

Before Sudderth , C.J

. ; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion



### D JIBRIL 

### J ACKSON 

### , Appellant

V



### . M OHAMMED 

### K HAN 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant ’ s b rief was due on January 13, 20 22 , b ut no brief was filed

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6 (a). On January 31, 2022, we notified A ppellant that his brief had not b een filed as the Rules of Appellate Procedure require. See id

. We warned that we could dis m iss t he appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, A ppellant filed a brief along with

a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untim el iness

. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8( a)(1), 42.3(b). More than ten days have passed , but we have not received a response

. Because A ppellant has failed to file a brief , we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42 .3(b), 43.2( f).

Per Curiam
Delivered : March 3, 2022
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the amended quarterly report of Peer Review Mediation & Arbitration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: December 16, 2008 | s/Willis Hale______________________ |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------|

|   | Willis Hale, Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------|

|   | And Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6250
TIMOTHY POOLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM SMITH, Warden for The Ma ryland House of Correction-Annex; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden for the Maryland House of CorrectionAnnex; OTHER UNNAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 270-AMD) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Poole, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Poole v. Smith , No. CA-96-270-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 95 East Main Street Service Station, Inc., et al., Appellants, v H & D All Type Auto Repair, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*for a declaration of the parties’ rights under a lease, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), entered February 1, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and declared, in relevant part, that the plaintiffs had failed to timely comply with the written notice of renewal provisions of article 28 of the lease.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants, as landlords, and the plaintiffs, as tenants, were parties to a 10-year commercial lease with an option to renew for an additional 10 years, provided written notice by certified mail was given to the landlords nine months prior to the expiration date of the lease. This time limitation on the exercise of the option was inserted in the form lease in typewriting. The tenants sent notice to renew the lease 1 day before the lease expired, which the landlords received 3 days after the lease had expired. The landlords rejected it and the tenants sued, *inter alia,*for a declaration of the parties’ rights under the lease. The Supreme Court granted the motion for summary judgment and entered an appropriate declaration in the landlords’ favor. We affirm.

The inserted typewritten time limitation on the option to renew is prominently displayed upon the face of the lease and is uncontradicted by any other clause found in the lease or in another contemporaneous agreement which was entered into by the parties, or their predecessors. Therefore, the time limitation clause cannot be eliminated by the court based upon an inference as to the intention of the parties that was not reflected in the lease *(see, e.g., Rodolitz v Neptune Paper Prods.,*22 NY2d 383, 386-387). Since the notice exercising the option was not given within the specified time period, it- was *441ineffective *(see, J.N.A. Realty Corp. v Cross Bay Chelsea,*42 NY2d 392, 396-397). In some cases, an equitable interest is recognized and protected against forfeiture, where the tenant has in good faith made improvements of a substantial character intending to renew the lease, the landlord is not harmed by the delay in notice, and the tenant would sustain substantial loss if the lease were not renewed *(see, J.N.A. Realty Corp. v Cross Bay Chelsea, supra,*at 397-400; *American Power Indus. v Rebel Realty Corp.,*145 AD2d 454; *Hunt v Carlson,*136 AD2d 853; *Tritt v Huffman & Boyle Co.,*121 AD2d 531). However, in this case, the tenants failed to set forth evidence sufficient to show that they made substantial improvements with the intent to renew the lease; nor has it been shown that the tenants have an interest in the premises as a long-standing location for a retail business *(see, TSS-Seedman’s, Inc. v Nicholas,*143 AD2d 223, 224). Indeed, it would appear the tenants deliberately delayed exercising the option to renew while they looked for another location and considered the possibility of selling or assigning the lease. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2007
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer                      |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. BRYAN GERARD WEIPERT, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 300 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. KENNETH J. STEWART, SR., Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 301 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. NATHAN MICHAEL MINNICH, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 302 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner : : : No. 303 MAL 2015[301 MAL 2015, 300 MAL 2015, 302 MAL 2015 and 303 MAL 2015] - 2

v. DUSTIN BLAKELY GROFF, Petitioner : : : : : : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Caleco Pharma Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



| | By:    |                                 
| | ------ | --------------------------------
| |        | /s/
      John Boschert         
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT                   
| |        |                                 
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and     
| |        | Chief Financial Officer         
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer and
| |        | Principal Financial Officer)    
| |        |                                 
| | Date:  | September 21, 2009              



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Order entered September 26, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00386 - CV IN RE HAMP WILLIAMS TRUST On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 17 - 08491



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 24, 2018 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to Monday, October 15, 2018

. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
| EXHIBIT 10.8 |
|--------------|

February 2, 2010
Dean E. Sukowatey, President
ALL Fuels & Energy Company
6165 N.W. 86th Street
Johnston, Iowa 50131
            Re:      Legal Services
Dear Dean:
            This will memorialize our oral agreement whereby we agreed to perform $15,000 in legalservices on behalf of ALL Fuels & Energy Company, in consideration of 1,000,000 free-tradingshares of common stock, to be issued to (1) L. A. Newlan, Jr. (500,000 shares) and (2) Eric Newlan(500,000 shares), both being partners in our firm, and 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stockto be issued to Newlan & Newlan, Attorneys at Law.  It is further our agreement that this letteragreement is to cover legal services through June 30, 2010.
            Should the foregoing accurately reflect our agreement, you need not respond to this letter.
            Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. 
                                                                        Sincerely,
                                                                        /s/
                                                                        Newlan & Newlan