alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AvizaTechnology, Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to his knowledge:

 

(1)           the accompanyingreport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periodspresented therein.

 

 
| Date: August 10, 2006 |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
|                  |
| By:                   | /s/ Patrick C. O’Connor |   |
|                  | Patrick C. O’Connor |
|                  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
NO. 91-407 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1992

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CESLAR LEE JONES, a/k/a LEE JONES, Deceased.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, In and for the County of Fergus, The Honorable Peter L. Rapkoch, Judge presiding.

COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Robert L. Johnson, Attorney at Law, Lewistown, Montana. For Respondent: Sarah Arnott Ozment, Attorney at Law, Livingston, Montana.

Filed: Submitted on Briefs: February 20, 1992 Decided: April 21, 1992

# ClerkJustice Fred J. Weber delivered the Opinion of the Court. Margaret Ann Monroe, former spouse of the decedent, filed a petition in behalf of the decedent's son, requesting a homestead allowance and a family allowance from the estate. The District Court, Tenth Judicial District, Fergus County, denied the request. We have reviewed the record and conclude that petitioner has failed to raise genuine issues of material fact. We conclude that the District Court correctly granted summary judgment for the estate. Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document with the Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result to the West Publishing 

### Company. Affirmed.

We Concur: n s ice 

# -w

### April 21, 1992 CERTIFICATEOFSERVICE 

### I hereby certify that the followingorderwas sent by United Statesmail, prepaid, to the followingnamed:
RobertL.Johnson Attorney atLaw Ste. 507,MontanaBldg. Lewistown. MT 59457 SarahArnott Ozment Attorney atLaw P.O. 

### Box 1160 Livingston,MT 59047 EDSMITH CLERKOFTHESUPREME COURT
WILLIAMS LAW GROUP, P.A.
                               2503 W. GARDNER CT.
                                 TAMPA FL 33611
                               PHONE: 813.831.9348
                                FAX: 813.832.5284
                         E-MAIL: WMSLAW@TAMPABAY.RR.COM


October 4, 2006

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc.

Via e-mail

Re:   Engagement Agreement

Dear Sirs:

This  letter  sets  forth  the  terms by which  this  firm  will be  engaged  in
connection  with  matters  described  below.  The  terms and  conditions  of the
engagement shall be as set forth in this letter.

ENGAGEMENT.  I have been  engaged as special SEC counsel for Majestic Oil & Gas,
Inc.
(the  "Company") to assist in preparing  required  10-KSB and 10-QSB reports for
the first year following the effective date of the SB-2 registration statement.

FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.  My fee shall be 250,000 shares of common stock. These
shares  will be  registered  on Form S-8. I will  prepare at my expense  the S-8
registration  statement and related legal opinion.  The  registration  statement
will only include my shares, unless otherwise mutually agreed in accordance with
our firm's current  policy.  If at any time you terminate this agreement  except
for my material  non-performance,  all shares  shall be fully  vested and remain
outstanding.

The Company shall be responsible  for SEC filing fees,  EDGAR fees, and CPA fees
in connection with the S-8.

IT IS OF THE  UTMOST  IMPORTANCE  FOR ME TO  KNOW  AT ALL  TIMES  THAT  YOU  ARE
SATISFIED  WITH THE  SERVICES  PROVIDED BY ME. So that there will always be full
and open  communication  between  me, and so that I may clearly  understand  and
promptly deal with any concerns you may have about my services, you agree to let
me know immediately in writing of any concerns you may have about the services I
perform for you. If you wait to inform me of your  concerns  until a later time,
it may no longer be  possible  for me to take any  meaningful  steps to  address
those concerns. At no time will I make any charge for time spent discussing such
matters.

If there  are any  questions  concerning  this  agreement,  please  contact  the
undersigned.

<PAGE>

If it is agreed that the foregoing sets forth the conditions of our  engagement,
please sign the extra copy of this letter where indicated and return it.

                                                 Sincerely,

                                                /s/ MICHAEL T. WILLIAMS, ESQ
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael T. Williams, Esq.

The above is understood and agreed to:

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc.

By:
   -----------------------------
   Patrick Montalban, President
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of W. S.  INDUSTRIES,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  November 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James F. Dempsey,  President and Chief Executive Officer,  respectively,  of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: April 4, 2006


/s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
_________________________________________
    James F. Dempsey
    President and Chief Executive Officer
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, UnitedStates District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2371

___________ Deborah Markham; Michael Rossini, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Maryland Heights Police Department; * Neil Kurlander; Mike Kloss; Steve * Osterloh, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 2, 2000 Filed: August 31, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Deborah Markham and Michael Rossini appeal the district court’s 1 denial of their Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motion, because it was untimely--alleging an error that could have been presented in a timely appeal, but having been filed more than-2-

thirty days after entry of judgment--and because it failed to present new arguments. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus. , 862 F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2
**CERTIFICATION**
The undersigned officer of Imperial Parking Corporation (the “Company”) herebycertifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2003 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, andshall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or “filed” for any purposewhatsoever.        Date:March 24, 2004 /s/ J. Bruce Newsome   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, William Dwyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Raser Technologies, Inc., (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrants other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|April 12, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ William Dwyer      
|(Date)         |  |  |  | William Dwyer,         
|               |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Linda Pancratz, certify that:

1.    I  have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of
    TDL Infomedia Group plc;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238 and 34-
47986];

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have
    disclosed,  based  on our most recent  evaluation  of
    internal  control  over financial reporting,  to  the
    company's  auditors and the audit  committee  of  the
    company's board of directors (or persons performing the
    equivalent functions):

    (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
         in the design or operation of internal control over
         financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
         adversely affect the company's ability to record,
         process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role
         in the company's internal control over financial
         reporting.


Date:  		23 March 2004
Signature:  /s/ LM Pancratz
Title: 		Chief Executive Officer
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      4(c)

    


    RESTATED
      CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

    OF

    BEAR
      STEARNS CAPITAL TRUST V

    


    THIS
      Restated Certificate of Trust of Bear Stearns Capital Trust V (the “Trust”),
      dated as of October 31, 2006 (this “Certificate”), is being duly executed and
      filed on behalf of the Trust by the undersigned, as trustee, to amend and
      restate the original Certificate of Trust of the Trust which was filed on
      November 4, 1998, with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware under
      the
      Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del.
      C.§
3801
      et
      seq.) (the “Act”).

    


    1.  Name.
      The
      name of the statutory trust continued hereby is Bear Stearns Capital Trust
      V.

    


    2. Delaware
      Trustee.
      The name
      and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are
      The Bank of New York (Delaware), 502 White Clay Center, Route 273, PO Box 6973,
      Newark, DE 19711

    


    3. Effective
      Date.
      This
      Certificate shall be effective upon filing.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate in accordance
      with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	
              The
                Bank of New York (Delaware), as 

              Delaware
                Trustee

            
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
            	By:  	/s/ KRISTINE
              K. GULLO
	 	
              

              Name:
                Kristine K. Gullo 

            
	 	Title:
              Vice President
#### Henry Daniel FANDEY, Jane Doe Fandey, Joseph S. Fandey, and Edith D. Fandey, Appellants, v. Bruce LEE and Elaine Lee, Appellees.

No. 08-92-00410-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

March 30, 1994.

*459John E. Keithly, Anthony, NM, Pete P. Gallego, Alpine, for appellants.

John Mundie, Miranda & Boyaki, El Paso, for appellees.

Before KOEHLER and LARSEN, JJ., and PRESLAR, C.J. (Retired, Sitting by Assignment).

*OPINION*

PER CURIAM.

In a bill of review proceeding brought by Appellees for reinstatement of a case dismissed for want of prosecution, the trial court granted Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, reinstating the case. Appellants, who are defendants in the reinstated case, bring this appeal claiming in two points of error that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Because jurisdiction is fundamental, an appellate court must determine, *sua sponte,*whether it has jurisdiction to consider an appeal. *H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Bay, Inc.,*808 S.W.2d 678, 679 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied); *Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Lubbock v. Graham & Assoc., Inc.,*664 S.W.2d 430, 433 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1983, no writ). An appeal may be taken only from a final judgment that disposes of all issues and parties. *Tesoro Petroleum v. Smith,*796 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.1990). The same rule applies to summary judgments. *Teer v. Duddlesten,*664 S.W.2d 702, 703 (Tex.1984); *Jackson v. Coldspring Terrace Property Owners Assn.,*838 S.W.2d 320, 322 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1992, no writ). A bill of review which sets aside a prior judgment and reinstates a case dismissed for want of prosecution without disposing of all of the issues of the reinstated case on the merits is interlocutory in nature and not a final judgment ripe for appeal. *Tesoro,*796 S.W.2d 705; *Warren v. Walter,*414 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.1967).

Although procedurally this case (with the petitioners for the bill of review having had their motion for summary judgment granted by the court) presents a somewhat different situation than any bill of review/summary judgment case we have been able to find, the result should be no different than would be the case if the trial court had, after hearing the merits of the bill of review, granted the relief by setting aside the judgment of dismissal and reinstated the case on the docket.

Having concluded that the “final” summary judgment was actually interlocutory, we, on our own motion, dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
EX-32
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PATRICK A. GALLIHER AND ARTHUR DE JOYA

                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of RMD Technologies, Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended February 28, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to their knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: June 14, 2006                   By: /s/  Patrtick A. Galliher
                                       Patrick A. Galliher, President



Dated: June 14, 2006                   By: /s/  Arthur De Joya
                                       Arthur De Joya,
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### Robert T. ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41061.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 29, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 3, 1989.

Larry C. Pace, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Christopher M. Kehr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before NUGENT, C.J., and CLARK and FENNER, JJ.

*643ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief after a hearing. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Dental Patient Care America, Inc.
(the "Corporation") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John M. Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Corporation.

DDate: April 12, 2005                             By: /s/ BRAD BERRETT
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Brad Berrett
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-K/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James
M. Spiezio,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section.  1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                    /s/ James M. Spiezio
                                    James M. Spiezio
                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                    May 13, 2004