alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David Johnson, the Chief Executive Officer, and Tom Mayenknecht, Secretary and Treasurer, of Park Place Energy Corp. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ David JohnsonDavid JohnsonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and a director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:  November 23, 2009
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Tom MayenknechtTom MayenknechtSecretary, Treasurer and a director 
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  November 23, 2009         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Park Place Energy Corp. and will be retained by Park Place Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Terra Block International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Gregory A. Pitner, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 25, 2004 | /s/ Gregory A. Pitner
Gregory A. Pitner
Chief Executive Officer of
Terra Block International, Inc.
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofVenoco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby certify thatthe report on Form 10-Q/A (the “Report”) of the Issuer for thequarter ended March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Issuer.
| /s/ TIMOTHY  M. MARQUEZ                |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy M. Marquez                     |
| *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman* |
| November  21, 2005                |
| /s/ DAVID B. CHRISTOFFERSON       |   |
| David B. Christofferson                |
| *Chief Financial Officer*              |
| November  21, 2005                |

 

----
Motion Granted; Order filed October 10, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 13

- 00256

- CR

____________
MILTON WHITING , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1365102



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Andrew G. McGee. Appellant’s brief was originally due July 1, 2013. Counsel has been granted four
extensions of time to file the brief until September 20, 2013. O n October 8, 2013,

counsel filed a further motion for extension of time. The court grants a final
extension and issues the following order:2

We order appellant’s counsel, Andrew G. McGee , to file appellant’s brief
in this appeal on or before November 4, 20 13

. No further extension s will be
entertained absent exceptional circumstances . If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to
conduct a hearing to determine the reas on for the fail ure to file the brief and the
consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6040

GARY CURTIS BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANK SIZER, JR., Warden, Western Correctional Institution; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-2443-PJM) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrell Non Roberts, III, ROBERTS & WOOD, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellant. David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, AnnNorman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gary Curtis Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Sizer , No. CA-98-2443- PJM (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Venoco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/TIMOTHY M. MARQUEZTimothy M. Marquez Chief Executive Officer and ChairmanAugust 6, 2008


/s/TIMOTHY A. FICKERTimothy A. Ficker Chief Financial OfficerAugust 6, 2008


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 91 (Thursday, May 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11593]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 10813-011]


City of Summerville; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

April 30, 1996.
    A draft environmental assessment (DEA) is available for public 
review. The DEA is for an application to amend the Summerville 
Hydroelectric Project. The application is to (1) substitute two 
turbine/generator units for the four units in the license; (2) revise 
the project boundary to include 9.6 miles of new transmission line in 
place of the licensed 8-mile transmission line; and (3) delete license 
article 303. The proposed amendment would not affect project capacity. 
The licensee requested the amendment because the original proposal was 
not economically feasible. The DEA finds that approval of the 
application would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment. The Summerville 
Hydroelectric Project is located on the Gauley River in Nicholas 
County, West Virginia.
    The DEA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the DEA can be viewed 
at the Commission's Reference and Information Center, 888 First Street 
NE., Washington, D.C. 20426. Copies can also be obtained by calling the 
project manager listed below.
    Please submit any comments within 20 days from the date of this 
notice. Any comments, conclusions, or recommendations that draw upon 
studies, reports or other working papers of substance should be 
supported by appropriate documentation.
    Comments should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, D.C. 
20426. Please affix Project No. 10813-011 to all comments. For further 
information, please contact the project manager, Heather Campbell, at 
(202) 219-3097.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11593 Filed 5-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10599]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

 Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 F.R. 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 F.R. 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to 
be included in the exhibit, ``In the Light of Italy: Corot and Early 
Plein-Air Painting'' (See list \1\), imported from abroad for the 
temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the temporary 
exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. from on or about May 26, 1996 to on or 
about September 2, 1996, at the Brooklyn Museum, Brooklyn, New York,. 
from on or about October 11, 1996 to January 12, 1997, and at the Saint 
Louis Art Museum, St. Louis, Missouri from on or about February 21, 
1997 to May 18, 1997 is in the national interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A Copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan, Assistant General Counsel, at 202 619-5030, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 Fourth Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Public Notice of this determination is ordered to be published in 
the Federal Register.


    Dated: April 24, 1996.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-10599 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5985 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 517 Seagaze Drive in Oceanside, California, 

as the ‘‘Charlesetta Reece Allen Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5985 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHARLESETTA REECE ALLEN POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 517 Seagaze Drive in Oceanside, 

5 California, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Charlesetta Reece Allen Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charlesetta Reece 

11 Allen Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5985 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostAllen Post Office Building’’. Oceanside, California, as the ‘‘Charlesetta Reece al Service located at 517 Seagaze Drive in
|   | Subscriber |   | Number ofShares Subscribed |   | Consideration to be Paidfor Shares Subscribed |
|--------|------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

|   | Dean Sukowatey |   | 187,500 |   | 187.50 |
|--------|----------------|--------|---------|--------|--------|

|   | Sun Bear, LLC |   | 125,000 |   | 125.00” |
|--------|---------------|--------|---------|--------|---------------|

|   | Subscriber |   | Number of Shares Subscribed |   | Consideration to be Paid for Shares                Subscribed |
|--------|------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dean Sukowatey |   | 1,500 |   | 150.00 |
|--------|----------------|--------|-------|--------|--------|

|   | Sun Bear, LLC |   | 1,000 |   | 150.00 |
|--------|---------------|--------|-------|--------|--------|

|   |   | /s/ DSDean Sukowatey |   | SUN BEAR, LLCBy: /s/ SBGScott B. GannPresident |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
#### Santos M. FLORES, M.D., Relator, v. The Honorable Carol R. HABERMAN, Judge, Respondent.

No. 95-0597.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Aug. 1, 1995.

Rehearing Overruled March 7, 1996.

*478Paul T. Curl, San Antonio, S. Mark Murray, San Antonio, for relator.

Robert E. Barger, San Antonio, Royal D. Adams, San Antonio, Karl E. Hays, San Antonio, Oliver S. Heard, Jr., San Antonio, Clifton F. Douglass, III, San Antonio, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This mandamus concerns the propriety of notices to file lis pendens. Because the interest asserted by the real parties in interest is not one articulated in Texas Property Code § 12.007(a), we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to cancel the notices of lis pendens.

Plaintiffs brought a suit for conversion against Flores. They alleged that he converted property and used the proceeds to buy certain other properties. In their petition, they sought the imposition of a constructive trust on the property. They filed notices of lis pendens on the purchased properties, and sought to have a constructive trust placed on those properties.

A party may file a lis pendens during the pendency of an action involving: 1) title to real property, 2) the establishment of an interest in real property, or 3) the enforcement of an encumbrance against real property. Tbx.Peop.Code § 12.007(a). In the present case, the plaintiffs seek a constructive trust in the purchased properties only to satisfy the judgment they seek against Flores. As such, the interest is no more than a collateral interest in the property. *Moss v. Tennant,*722 S.W.2d 762, 763 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, orig. proceeding). Therefore the notices of lis pen-dens are improper.

Without hearing oral argument, a majority of this Court conditionally grants the petition for mandamus directing the district judge to cancel the notices of lis pendens and vacate the earlier order refusing to cancel the notices of lis pendens. Tex.R.App.P. 122.
**Exhibit 31.2** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Dirkson R. Charles, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of K&F Industries Holdings, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  DIRKSON    R. CHARLES    Dirkson R. Charles    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: May 11, 2006
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

1.               The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:      May 13, 2011 | By:                                                   | /s/ Lawrence R. Miller |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                                                       | Lawrence R. Miller                                    |
|                                                       | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                                                       |                                                  |
| Date:      May 13, 2011 | By:                                                   | /s/ Katie N. Tuttle    |
|                                                       | Katie N. Tuttle                                       |
|                                                       | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Timothy M. Marquez, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of Venoco, Inc. (“Registrant”);

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| /s/ TIMOTHY M.  MARQUEZ                |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy M. Marquez                     |
| *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman* |
| November 21, 2005                 |

 

----