20746 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The public

record is located in Room 1132 of the

Public Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operations Division

(7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA.

The official record for this

rulemaking, as well as the public

version, as described above will be kept

in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will

transfer any copies of objections and

hearing requests received electronically

into printed, paper form as they are

received and will place the paper copies

in the official rulemaking record which

will also include all comments

submitted directly in writing. The

official rulemaking record is the paper

record maintained at the address in

ADDRESSES at the beginning of this

document.

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), the Agency

must determine whether the regulatory

action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore

subject to review by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) any the

requirements of the Executive Order.

Under section 3(f), the order defines ‘‘a

significant regulatory action’’ as an

action that is likely to result in a rule

(1) having an annual effect on the

economy of $100 million or more, or

adversely and materially affecting a

sector of the economy, productivity,

competition, jobs, the environment,

public health or safety, or State, local or

tribal governments or communities (also

referred to as ‘‘economically

significant’’); (2) creating serious

inconsistency or otherwise interfering

with an action taken or planned by

another agency; (3) materially altering

the budgetary impacts of entitlement,

grants, user fees, or loan programs or the

rights and obligations thereof; or (4)

raising novel legal or policy issues

arising out of legal mandates, the

President’s priorities, or the principles

set forth in this Executive Order.

Pursuant to the terms of this

Executive Order, EPA has determined

that this rule is not ‘‘significant’’ and is

therefore not subject to OMB review.

This action does not impose any

enforceable duty, or contain any

‘‘unfunded mandates’’ as described in

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Act

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), or require prior

consultation as specified by Executive

Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October 28,

1993), entitled Enhancing the

Intergovernmental Partnership, or

special consideration as required by

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,

February 16, 1994).

Pursuant to the requirements of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.

601–612), the Administrator has

determined that regulations establishing

new tolerances or raising tolerance

levels or establishing exemptions from

tolerance requirements do not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities. A

certification statement explaining the

factual basis for this determination was

published in the Federal Register of

May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

Stephen L. Johnson,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is

amended as follows:

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

2. In § 180.449, by revising paragraph

(a) to read as follows:

§ 180.449 Avermectin B1 and its delta-8,9

isomer; tolerances for residues.

(a) Tolerances are established for the

combined residues of the insecticide

avermectin B1 [a mixture of avermectins

containing greater than or equal to 80%

avermectin B1a (5-O-demethyl

avermectin Al) and less than or equal to

20% avermectin Blb (5-O- demethyl-25-

de(1-methylpropyl)-25-(1-methylethyl)

avermectin Al)] and its delta-8,9-isomer

in or on the following commodities:

Commodity

Parts

per

million

Expiration

date

Cattle, fat ..................... 0.015 Apr.30,

1996

Cattle, meat ................. 0.02 Do

Cattle, mbyp ................ 0.02 Do

Citrus whole fruit ......... 0.02 Do

Cottonseed .................. 0.005 Do

Hops, dried .................. 0.5 Dec. 31,

1996

Milk .............................. 0.005 Apr. 30,

1996

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 96–11337 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CC Docket No. 91–281; DA 96–439]

Calling Number Identification

Service—Caller ID

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission (Commission).

ACTION: Final rule; waiver.

SUMMARY: The Common Carrier Bureau,

acting pursuant to delegated authority,

granted Sprint Communications Co.

(Sprint) a waiver of the Federal

Communications Commission’s calling

party number (CPN) delivery rules until

June 1, 1996. The Commission’s CPN

delivery rules require that common

carriers using Signaling System 7 are

required to transmit the CPN associated

with an interstate call to interconnecting

carriers. Sprint requested the waiver

because it needed additional time to

correct a technical problem in which the

privacy of a calling party might be

compromised. The Bureau conditioned

this waiver on Sprint providing two

progress reports to the Bureau. These

reports are to be provided not later than

April 15, 1996 and again on May 10,

1996. The intended effect of this action

is to avoid compromising the privacy of

callers.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Nightingale, Network Services

Division, Common Carrier Bureau at

202–418–2352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

summary describes the Bureau’s Order

in the matter of Rules and Policies

Regarding Calling Number Identification

Service, (CC Docket 91–281, adopted

March 27, 1996 and released March 29,

1995). The file is available for

inspection and copying during the

weekday hours of 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in

the Commission’s Reference Center,

Room 239, 1919 M St., NW.,

Washington DC, or copies may be

purchased from the Commission’s

duplicating contractor, ITS, Inc. 2100 M

St., NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC

20037, phone 202–857–3800.

Analysis of the Order

After reviewing Sprint’s petition for

stay and waiver of the Commission’s

rules governing calling party number

(CPN) delivery and privacy, the Bureau

has concluded to grant Sprint a

temporary waiver until June 1, 1996 of

Section 64.1601(a) and Section 64.103

of the Commission’s rules.

Sprint requested additional time to

comply with the Commission’s caller ID
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 20747

rules because it identified two technical

problems that might compromise the

privacy of calling parties. Sprint

indicated that one of the problems could

be corrected by the end of April 1996,

while the other could be corrected by

the end of July 1996.

This request for additional time to

comply with the Commission’s caller ID

rules presented the Bureau with the

undesirable choice between (1) granting

the requested waiver and temporarily

frustrating the Commission’s federal

objective of widespread CPN

availability, or (2) denying the waivers

and temporarily frustrating the

Commission’s federal privacy

objectives. The Bureau determined that

compromising the privacy of callers

would be unacceptable. Therefore,

Sprint was granted a waiver until June

1, 1996 of the Commission’s rule that

requires carriers to pass CPN. The

Bureau did not grant additional time to

Sprint beyond this date because (1) It

found that Sprint had provided

inadequate information to allow a

determination whether a waiver of the

Commission’s CPN rules until July 31,

1996 would be in the public interest,

and (2) it believed that Sprint may have

adequate time to correct both problems

by June 1, 1996. Additionally, the

Bureau noted that on June 1, 1996 the

Commission’s stay applicable to

interstate calls made to and from

California expires and that the Bureau

sought to avoid unnecessary customer

confusion associated with interstate

calls that do not contain caller ID

information beyond this date. The

Bureau indicated that by granting this

waiver until June 1, 1996 and denying

Sprint’s request for additional time, the

major sources of customer confusion

related to interstate caller ID will be

eliminated as of June 1, 1996.

The Bureau conditioned the waiver

on the requirement that Sprint file two

reports with the Bureau indicating the

progress of steps being taken to ensure

compliance. Finally, the Bureau

reiterated that it would not tolerate

repeated compliance delays and that, if

appropriate, it would take enforcement

action.

Ordering Clauses

It is ordered, pursuant to Section 1.3

of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.3,

and authority delegated in Section 0.91

of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 0.91,

and Section 0.291 of the Commission’s

rules, 47 CFR 0.291, that Sprint’s

request for a waiver of Section

64.1601(a) and Section 64.1603 of the

Commission’s rules is granted in part

and denied in part. This waiver is

effective until June 1, 1996, and is

subject to the conditions specified

herein.

It is further ordered that this order is

effective upon release.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64

Calling party number identification

(caller ID), Communications common

carriers, Privacy, Telephone.

Federal Communications Commission.

Geraldine Matise,

Chief, Network Services Division, Common

Carrier Bureau.

[FR Doc. 96–11383 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 90–45; RM–7121]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Madera

and Clovis, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This document reallots

Channel 221B1 from Madera to Clovis,

California, and modifies the license of

KZFO Broadcasting, Inc. for Station

KZFO(FM), as requested, pursuant to

the provisions of Section 1.420(i) of the

Commission’s Rules. See 55 FR 7509,

published March 2, 1990; see also 56 FR

42966, published August 30, 1991. The

allotment of Channel 221B1 to Clovis

will provide a first local FM service to

the community without depriving

Madera of local aural transmission

service. Coordinates used for Channel

221B1 at Clovis are 36–55–50 and 119–

38–38. With this action, the proceeding

is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202)

418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Report

and Order, MM Docket No. 90–45,

adopted April 11, 1996, and released

April 29, 1996. The full text of this

Commission decision is available for

inspection and copying during normal

business hours in the FCC’s Reference

Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW.,

Washington, DC. The complete text of

this decision may also be purchased

from the Commission’s copy

contractors, International Transcription

Service, Inc., (202) 857–3800, located at

1919 M Street, NW., Room 246, or 2100

M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington,

DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Radio broadcasting.

Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of

Federal Regulations is amended as

follows:

PART 73—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 73

continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended,

1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, as amended.

§ 73.202 [Amended]

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM

Allotments under California, is

amended by removing Channel 221B1 at

Madera, and adding Clovis, Channel

221B1.

Federal Communications Commission.

Andrew J. Rhodes,

Acting Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and

Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 96–11381 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs

Administration

49 CFR Parts 172, 173, 174, and 176

[Docket No. HM–169A; Amdt. Nos. 172–143,

173–244, 174–80, 176–37]

RIN 2137–AB60

Hazardous Materials Transportation

Regulations; Compatibility with

Regulations of the International Atomic

Energy Agency

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs

Administration (RSPA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; editorial revisions

and response to a petition for

reconsideration.

SUMMARY: On September 28, 1995, RSPA

published a final rule which amended

the Hazardous Materials Regulations

pertaining to the transportation of

radioactive materials to harmonize them

with those of the International Atomic

Energy Agency (IAEA) and, thus, most

major nuclear nations of the world.

Several substantive changes were made

to provide a more uniform degree of

safety for various types of shipments.

These changes included requiring

offerors and carriers to maintain written

radiation protection programs, revising

the definition of and packaging for low

specific activity radioactive materials,

and requiring use of the International

System of Units for the measurement of

activity in a package of radioactive

material. This final rule makes editorial

and technical corrections to that final

rule and responds to a petition for

reconsideration.