Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Notices 20819

Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

The U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency will receive written comments

relating to this settlement for thirty days

from the date of publication of this

notice.

Authority: The Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation, and

Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C.

Sections 9601 et seq.

William E. Muno,

Director, Superfund Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11487 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5501–9]

National Pin Service Site: Notice of

Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(g) of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended 42

U.S.C. 9601 et seq., the Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) has agreed to

settle claims for response costs at the

National Pin Service Site, Saratoga,

Wilson County, North Carolina, with the

Defense Reutilization and Market

Service (DRMS), Defense Logistic

Agency (DLA), U.S. Department of

Defense (DoD). EPA will consider public

comments on the proposed settlements

for thirty (30) days. EPA may withdraw

from or modify the proposed

settlements should such comments

disclose facts or considerations which

indicate the proposed settlement is

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

Copies of the settlements are available

from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4, Waste Management Division,

Waste Programs Branch, Cost Recovery

Section, 345 Courtland Street, NE.,

Atlanta, Georgia 30365, 404–347–5059,

vmx. 6169. Written comments must be

submitted to Mr. Ray Strickland at the

above address within thirty (30) days

from the date of publication.

Dated: April 12, 1996.

James S. Kutzman,

Acting Director, Waste Management Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11483 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5500–1]

Notice of Proposed Assessment of

Clean Water Act Class II Administrative

Penalty to Superior Spring Company

and Opportunity To Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed

administrative penalty assessment and

opportunity to comment.

SUMMARY: EPA is providing notice of

proposed administrative penalty

assessment for alleged violations of the

Clean Water Act. EPA is also providing

notice of opportunity to comment on the

proposed assessment.

Under 33 U.S.C. Section 1319(g), EPA

is authorized to issue orders assessing

civil penalties for various violations of

the Act. EPA may issue these orders

after the commencement of either a

Class I or Class II penalty proceeding.

EPA provides public notice of the

proposed assessments pursuant to 33

U.S.C. Section 1319(g)(4)(a).

Class II proceedings are conducted

under EPA’s Consolidated Rules of

Practice Governing the Administrative

Assessment of Civil Penalties and the

Revocation and Suspension of Permits,

40 CFR Part 22. The procedures through

which the public may submit written

comment on a proposed Class II order

or participate in a Class II proceeding,

and the Procedures by which a

Respondent may request a hearing, are

set forth in the Consolidated Rules. The

deadline for submitting public comment

on a proposed Class II order is thirty

days after publication of this notice.

On the date identified below, EPA

commenced the following Class II

proceeding for the assessment of

penalties:

In the Matter of Superior Spring Company,

formerly located at 2447 Merced Avenue,

South El Monte, California 91733, but now

located at 1260 South Talt Avenue, Anaheim,

California 92806; EPA Docket No. CWA–IX–

FY96–02; filed on April 22, 1996, with Mr.

Steven Armsey, Regional Hearing Clerk, U.S.

EPA, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, California 94105, (415) 744–1389;

proposed penalty of $60,000 for failure to

submit self-monitoring reports during the

final three and half years of operation in

South El Monte and for past violations of

local sewer discharge limits.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Persons wishing to receive a copy of

EPA’s Consolidated Rules, review of the

complaint or other documents filed in

this proceeding, comment upon a

proposed assessment, or otherwise

participate in the proceeding should

contact the Regional Hearing Clerk

identified above. The administrative

record for this proceeding is located in

the EPA Regional Office identified

above, and the file will be open for

public inspection during normal

business hours. All information

submitted by the respondent is available

as part of the administrative record,

subject to provisions of law restricting

public disclosure of confidential

information. In order to provide

opportunity for public comment, EPA

will issue no final order assessing a

penalty in these proceedings prior to

thirty (30) days after the date of

publication of this notice.

Dated: April 22, 1996.

Karen Schwinn,

Acting Director, Water Management Division.

[FR Doc. 96–11488 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Renewal Application Designated for

Hearing

1. The Assistant Chief, Audio Services

Division, has before him the following

application for renewal of broadcast

license:

Licensee City/state File No. MM docket No.

Southwestern Broadcasting Corporation ................... Brownfield, Texas ...................................................... BRH–900315UC 96–104

(Seeking renewal of the license for

KLZK(FM)).

2. Pursuant to Section 309(e) of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, the above application has

been designated for hearing in a

proceeding upon the following issues:

(a) To determine whether

Southwestern Broadcasting Corporation

has the capability and intent to

expeditiously resume the broadcast

operations of KLZK(FM), consistent

with the Commission’s Rules.

(b) To determine whether

Southwestern Broadcasting Corporation

has violated Sections 73.1740 and/or

73.1750 of the Commission’s Rules.

(c) To determine, in light of the

evidence adduced pursuant to the

foregoing issues, whether grant of the
20820 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Notices

subject renewal of license application

would service the public interest,

convenience and necessity.

A copy of the complete HDO in this

proceeding is available for inspection

and copying during normal business

hours in the dockets section of the FCC

Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. The

complete text may also be purchased

from the Commission’s duplicating

contractor, International Transcription

Service, 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140,

Washington, D.C. 20037 (telephone

202–857–3800).

Federal Communications Commission.

Stuart B. Bedell,

Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division,

Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 96–11440 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License

Applicants

Notice is hereby given that the

following applicants have filed with the

Federal Maritime Commission

applications for licenses as ocean freight

forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the

Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C app.

1718 and 46 CFR 510).

Persons knowing of any reason why

any of the following applicants should

not receive a license are requested to

contact the Office of Freight Forwarders,

Federal Maritime Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20573.

CJC International Services, Inc., 8745

N.W. 100th Street, Medley, FL 33178,

Officers: Juan Carlos Lebrija,

President, Celia Munoz, Vice

President

World Exchange, Inc., 6011 Avion

Drive, Suite 201, Los Angeles, CA

90045, Officers: Frank Gomez,

President, Teresa Reesing, Vice

President

Dated: May 2, 1996.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–11455 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

The companies listed in this notice

have applied to the Board for approval,

pursuant to the Bank Holding Company

Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part

225), and all other applicable statutes

and regulations to become a bank

holding company and/or to acquire the

assets or the ownership of, control of, or

the power to vote shares of a bank or

bank holding company and all of the

banks and nonbanking companies

owned by the bank holding company,

including the companies listed below.

The applications listed below, as well

as other related filings required by the

Board, are available for immediate

inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank

indicated. Once the application has

been accepted for processing, it will also

be available for inspection at the offices

of the Board of Governors. Interested

persons may express their views in

writing on the standards enumerated in

the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the

proposal also involves the acquisition of

a nonbanking company, the review also

includes whether the acquisition of the

nonbanking company complies with the

standards in section 4 of the BHC Act,

including whether the acquisition of the

nonbanking company can ‘‘reasonably

be expected to produce benefits to the

public, such as greater convenience,

increased competition, or gains in

efficiency, that outweigh possible

adverse effects, such as undue

concentration of resources, decreased or

unfair competition, conflicts of

interests, or unsound banking practices’’

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for

a hearing must be accompanied by a

statement of the reasons a written

presentation would not suffice in lieu of

a hearing, identifying specifically any

questions of fact that are in dispute,

summarizing the evidence that would

be presented at a hearing, and indicating

how the party commenting would be

aggrieved by approval of the proposal.

Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking

activities will be conducted throughout

the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments

regarding each of these applications

must be received at the Reserve Bank

indicated or the offices of the Board of

Governors not later than May 31, 1996.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of

Richmond (Lloyd W. Bostian, Jr., Senior

Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street,

Richmond, Virginia 23261:

1. United Community Bankshares,

Inc., Franklin, Virginia; to become a

bank holding company by acquiring 100

percent of the voting shares of The Bank

of Franklin, Franklin, Virginia, and The

Bank of Sussex and Surry, Wakefield,

Virginia.

B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

(Genie D. Short, Vice President) 2200

North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-

2272:

1. First La Grange Bancshares, Inc., La

Grange, Texas; to become a bank

holding company by acquiring 100

percent of the voting shares of LGF

Bancshares, Inc., Dover, Delaware, and

thereby indirectly acquire The First

National Bank of La Grange, La Grange,

Texas.

In connection with this application,

LGF Bancshares, Inc., Dover, Delaware,

has applied to become a bank holding

company by acquiring 100 percent of

the voting share of The First National

Bank of La Grange, La Grange, Texas.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, May 2, 1996.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 96–11415 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

Notice of Proposals to Engage in

Permissible Nonbanking Activities or

to Acquire Companies that are

Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking

Activities

The companies listed in this notice

have given notice under section 4 of the

Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C.

1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation

Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo,

or to acquire or control voting securities

or assets of a company that engages

either directly or through a subsidiary or

other company, in a nonbanking activity

that is listed in § 225.25 of Regulation

Y (12 CFR 225.25) or that the Board has

determined by Order to be closely

related to banking and permissible for

bank holding companies. Unless

otherwise noted, these activities will be

conducted throughout the United States.

Each notice is available for inspection

at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.

Once the notice has been accepted for

processing, it will also be available for

inspection at the offices of the Board of

Governors. Interested persons may

express their views in writing on the

question whether the proposal complies

with the standards of section 4 of the

BHC Act, including whether

consummation of the proposal can

‘‘reasonably be expected to produce

benefits to the public, such as greater

convenience, increased competition, or

gains in efficiency, that outweigh

possible adverse effects, such as undue

concentration of resources, decreased or

unfair competition, conflicts of

interests, or unsound banking practices’’

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a

hearing on this question must be

accompanied by a statement of the

reasons a written presentation would

not suffice in lieu of a hearing,

identifying specifically any questions of