alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this quarterly report of Peer Review Mediation and Arbitration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: November 16, 2009 | s/Willis Hale_____________________ |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------|

Willis Hale, Chief Executive Officer

 

| Dated: November 16, 2009 | s/Marc E. Combs__________________ |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|

Marc E. Combs, Chief Financial Officer
#### Robbie ASBRIDGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64406.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 19, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 6, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 15, 1994.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:* National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Career Development (K), Conference Support (R13), and Research Education (R25) Review.

*Date:* July 16, 2021.

*Time:* 09:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

*Agenda:* To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.

*Place:* National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).

*Contact Person:* John K. Holden, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 920, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8775, *john.holden@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 9, 2021.

David W Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-12414 Filed 6-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350        (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

In connection with the filing by Assure Data, Inc. (the “Company”) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: November 12, 2008 | /s/ Robert Lisle                          |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                         | Robert Lisle, Chief Executive Officer and |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer                   |
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nora HOPKINS, Appellant.

No. WD 46227.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 19, 1993.

Marcie W. Bower, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from two convictions of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo Supp.1992, and from two consecutive prison terms of five years.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
      30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








Dated:*August 14, 2007*





*/s/
      Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC
Order issued October( i .2012

In The

(tnirt uf pcahi

Fift1! Jiiitrirt nf xwi at Jat1ai

No. 05-10-01375-CV

IN THE iNTEREST OF C.H.C. AND S.M.C., CHILDREN

ORDER

Appcllcc asserts in his brief that the trial court has appointed a parenting facilitator.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Collin County District Clerk to file a supplemental transcript by

October 26, 2012 containing either any order or orders appointing a parenting facilitator or a verified

statement by the clcrk that there is no order appointing a parenting facilitator in this c’s

JIM MOSELEY

PRESIDIIG JUSTICE /
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML Appleton FuturesAccessLLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Robert M. Alderman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1.  This Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.  The information contained in this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 15, 2006                             |                   |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                                            |
| By                                              | /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN |   |
| Robert M. Alderman                              |
| Chief Executive  Officer, President and Manager |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)                  |
|                                                 |                        |  |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5823 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5823

To provide for continued operation of the Coast Guard in the event of a 
                        lapse in appropriation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2023

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for continued operation of the Coast Guard in the event of a 
                        lapse in appropriation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUED OPERATION OF COAST GUARD.

    In the case of a lapse in appropriations for the Coast Guard, there 
are appropriated such amounts as may be necessary for the operation of 
the Coast Guard for the lesser of--
            (1) 30 days; or
            (2) the duration of the lapse in appropriation.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6152** 

FREDRICK STINSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MICHAEL ALLEN, Circuit Court Judge; LARRY STEVEN HOGAN, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 01364

- LMB

- JFA )

Submitted : May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Fred rick Stinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Fredrick Stinson appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Stinson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, S tinson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly , we affirm
the district court ’ s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Robert ENGELAGE, Appellant, v. Lydia ENGELAGE, Respondent.

No. WD 48597.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 8, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 27, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 21, 1995.

Don Roberson, Kansas City, for appellant.

Michael Levota, Independence, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals the denial of his motion to modify maintenance provisions of a dissolution decree.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10530]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 1996 / 
Notices

[[Page 18543]]



AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME: 12:00 noon--3:00 p.m.

PLACE: ADF Headquarters.

DATE: Wednesday, May 1, 1996.

STATUS: Open.

Agenda

12:00 noon--Lunch
12:30--Chairman's Report
12:45 p.m.--President's Report
1:30 p.m.--Other

    If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to Ms. 
Janis McCollim, Executive Assistant to the President, who can be 
reached at (202) 673-3916.
William R. Ford,
President.
[FR Doc. 96-10530 Filed 4-24-96; 12:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5874 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5874

To amend the United States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act 
     to reauthorize the United States-Mexico transboundary aquifer 
                          assessment program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 3, 2023

Mr. Ciscomani (for himself and Ms. Stansbury) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the United States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act 
     to reauthorize the United States-Mexico transboundary aquifer 
                          assessment program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transboundary Aquifer Assessment 
Program Act'' or the ``TAAP Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF TRANSBOUNDARY AQUIFER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Designation of Priority Transboundary Aquifers.--Section 
4(c)(2) of the United States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1962 note; Public Law 109-448) is amended by striking 
``New Mexico or Texas'' and inserting ``New Mexico, Texas, or Arizona 
(other than an aquifer underlying Arizona and Sonora, Mexico, that is 
partially within the Yuma groundwater basin designated by the order of 
the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources dated June 
21, 1984)''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 8(a) of the United 
States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act (42 U.S.C. 1962 
note; Public Law 109-448) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2007 
through 2016'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2035''.
    (c) Sunset of Authority.--Section 9 of the United States-Mexico 
Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act (42 U.S.C. 1962 note; Public Law 
109-448) is amended by striking ``enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
``enactment of the Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Program Act''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5850 

To nullify modifications made by the Food and Drug Administration on 

January 3, 2023, to the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under 

section 505–1 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 

355–1) for mifepristone, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023 

Mr. MANN (for himself and Mr. MOOLENAAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To nullify modifications made by the Food and Drug Administration on January 3, 2023, to the risk evaluation 

and mitigation strategy under section 505–1 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355– 

1) for mifepristone, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF REMS MODIFICATIONS FOR 

4 MIFEPRISTONE; NO FEDERAL FUNDING TO 

5 IMPLEMENT REMS FOR MIFEPRISTONE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The modifications made by the 

7 Food and Drug Administration on January 3, 2023, to 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5850 IH

1 the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under section 

2 505–1 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 

3 U.S.C. 355–1) for mifepristone are hereby nullified. 

4 (b) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS.—No Federal 

5 funds may be used to establish, implement, or enforce— 

6 (1) any provision of a risk evaluation and miti7 gation strategy under section 505–1 of the Federal 

8 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355–1) 

9 for mifepristone that is substantially similar to any 

10 of the modifications nullified by subsection (a); or 

11 (2) any non-enforcement or enforcement discre12 tion policy for any provision of a risk evaluation and 

13 mitigation strategy under such section for 

14 mifepristone. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
10.23


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SONUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


This First Amendment to the Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Stack
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made effective as of August 28, 2006.


WHEREAS, The Board of Directors of the Company deems it necessary and
in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders that Section 7.1 of
the Plan be amended and restated as set forth herein;


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as
follows:


1.             Section 7.1 of the
Plan is hereby amended and restated to read in full as follows:


“7.1         ADMINISTRATOR.  Authority to control and manage the operation
and administration of the Plan shall be vested in the Board, which may delegate
such responsibilities in whole or in part to a committee consisting of two (2)
or more members of the Board (the “Committee”). 
Members of the Committee may be appointed from time to time by, and
shall serve at the pleasure of, the Board. 
The Board (or the Committee, as applicable) may delegate to the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company the authority to (i) designate new
employees of the Company or an Affiliated Company who are not officers of the
Company to be the recipient of Incentive Options, Nonqualified Options or
Rights of Purchase, and (ii) determine the number of shares of Common
Stock to be subject to such Incentive Options, Nonqualified Options or Rights
of Purchase; provided, however, that the Board resolutions regarding such
delegation of authority or the employee compensation program approved by the
Board or Committee shall specify the maximum number of shares of Common Stock
that may be subject to any Incentive Option, Nonqualified Option or Right of
Purchase granted by the Chief Executive Officer depending upon the employee group
of such new Employee; and provided, further, that the Chief Executive Officer
may not grant options to himself, or any other officer of the Company.  As used herein, the term “Administrator”
means the Board or, with respect to any matter as to which responsibility has
been delegated to the Committee or the Chief Executive Officer, the term
Administrator shall mean the Committee or the Chief Executive Officer, as the
case may be.”


2.             Unless otherwise
amended as set forth herein, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed the First Amendment as
of the day and year first above written.


	
  

  	
   

  	
  SONUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

  a Delaware
  corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/Michael A. Martino

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:     Michael A. Martino

  Title:       President and Chief
  Executive Officer
CH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0412

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THOMAS JOE ELLSWORTH,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including September 4, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

State’s response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

July 27 2022

07/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0412