Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 20745

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

2. Section 180.425, is amended by

revising the section heading, the

introductory paragraph, and in the table

by adding alphabetically the entry for

‘‘beans, snap’’, to read as follows:

§ 180.425 Clomazone; tolerances for

residues.

Tolerances are established for

residues of the herbicide clomazone, 2-

(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-

isoxazolidinone, in or on the following

raw agricultural commodities:

Commodity Parts per

million

Beans, snap .............................. 0.05

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 96–11339 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

40 CFR Part 180

[PP–4E4419/R2236; FRL–5366–8]

RIN 2070–AB78

Avermectin B1 and its Delta-8,9-

Isomer; Extension of Time-Limited

Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This document extends the

effective date for the time-limited

tolerance established for the combined

residues of the insecticide avermectin

B1 and its delta-8,9-isomer in or on the

raw agricultural commodity dried hops.

The Interregional Research Project No. 4

(IR–4) requested the regulation to

establish a maximum permissible level

for residues of the insecticide pursuant

to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic

Act (FFDCA).

EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation

becomes effective May 8, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and

hearing requests, identified by the

document control number, [PP–4E4419/

R2236], may be submitted to: Hearing

Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection

Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460. Fees

accompanying objections and hearing

requests shall be labeled ‘‘Tolerance

Petition Fees’’ and forwarded to: EPA

Headquarters Accounting Operations

Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box

360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. A copy

of any objections and hearing requests

filed with the Hearing Clerk should be

identified by the document control

number and submitted to: Public

Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operations Division

(7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In

person, bring copy of objections and

hearing requests to Rm. 1132, CM #2,

1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington,

VA 22202.

A copy of objections and hearing

requests filed with the Hearing Clerk

may also be submitted electronically by

sending electronic mail (e-mail) to: oppdocket@epamail.epa.gov.

Copies of objections and hearing

requests must be submitted as an ASCII

file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Copies of objections and hearing

requests will also be accepted on disks

in WordPerfect 5.1 file format or ASCII

file format. All copies of objections and

hearing requests in electronic form must

be identified by the docket number [PP–

4E4419/R2236]. No Confidential

Business Information (CBI) should be

submitted through e-mail. Electronic

copies of objections and hearing

requests on this rule may be filed online

at many Federal Depository Libraries.

Additional information on electronic

submissions can be found below in this

document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Hoyt L. Jamerson, Registration

Division (7505W), Environmental

Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460. Office location

and telephone number: Sixth Floor,

Crystal Station #1, 2800 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA 22202. (703)

308–8783; e-mail:

jamerson.hoyt@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the

Federal Register of March 20, 1996 (61

FR 11357), EPA issued a proposed rule

(FRL–5356–2) to amend 40 CFR part 180

by extending the effective date for the

established time-limited tolerance for

the combined residues of the insecticide

avermectin B1 and its delta-8,9-isomer

in or on the raw agricultural commodity

dried hops at 0.5 parts per million

(ppm). EPA proposed that the expiration

date for the tolerance be extended from

April 30, 1996 to December 31, 1996, to

allow EPA additional time to evaluate

IR–4’s petition for a permanent

tolerance for residues of avermectin B1

and its delta-8,9-isomer in or on the raw

agricultural commodity dried hops.

The data considered in support of the

established tolerance for dried hops are

discussed in the proposed rule, which

was published in the Federal Register

notice of September 13, 1995 (59 FR

49826). Additional information

regarding EPA’s proposal to extend the

effective data for the time-limited

tolerance is discussed in the Federal

Register of March 20, 1996 [61 FR

11357]. There were no comments or

requests for referral to an advisory

committee received in response to the

proposed rule to extend the effective

date for the time-limited tolerance.

Based on the data and information

considered, the Agency concludes that

the tolerance will protect the public

health. Therefore, the tolerance is

amended as set forth below.

Any person adversely affected by this

regulation may, within 30 days after

publication of this document in the

Federal Register, file written objections

to the regulation and may also request

a hearing on those objections.

Objections and hearing requests must be

filed with the Hearing Clerk, at the

address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A

copy of the objections and/or hearing

requests filed with the Hearing Clerk

should be submitted to the OPP docket

for this rulemaking. The objections

submitted must specify the provisions

of the regulation deemed objectionable

and the grounds for the objections (40

CFR 178.25). Each objection must be

accompanied by the fee prescribed by

40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is

requested, the objections must include a

statement of the factual issue(s) on

which a hearing is requested, the

requestor’s contentions on such issues,

and a summary of any evidence relied

upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A

request for a hearing will be granted if

the Administrator determines that the

material submitted shows the following:

There is genuine and substantial issue

of fact; there is a reasonable possibility

that available evidence identified by the

requestor would, if established, resolve

one or more of such issues in favor of

the requestor, taking into account

uncontested claims or facts to the

contrary; and resolution of the factual

issue(s) in the manner sought by the

requestor would be adequate to justify

the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).

A record has been established for this

rulemaking under docket number [PP–

4E4419/R2236] (including any

objections and hearing requests

submitted electronically as described

below). A public version of this record,

including printed, paper versions of

electronic comments which does not

include any information claimed as CBI,

is available for inspection from 8 a.m. to
20746 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 8, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The public

record is located in Room 1132 of the

Public Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operations Division

(7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA.

The official record for this

rulemaking, as well as the public

version, as described above will be kept

in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will

transfer any copies of objections and

hearing requests received electronically

into printed, paper form as they are

received and will place the paper copies

in the official rulemaking record which

will also include all comments

submitted directly in writing. The

official rulemaking record is the paper

record maintained at the address in

ADDRESSES at the beginning of this

document.

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), the Agency

must determine whether the regulatory

action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore

subject to review by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) any the

requirements of the Executive Order.

Under section 3(f), the order defines ‘‘a

significant regulatory action’’ as an

action that is likely to result in a rule

(1) having an annual effect on the

economy of $100 million or more, or

adversely and materially affecting a

sector of the economy, productivity,

competition, jobs, the environment,

public health or safety, or State, local or

tribal governments or communities (also

referred to as ‘‘economically

significant’’); (2) creating serious

inconsistency or otherwise interfering

with an action taken or planned by

another agency; (3) materially altering

the budgetary impacts of entitlement,

grants, user fees, or loan programs or the

rights and obligations thereof; or (4)

raising novel legal or policy issues

arising out of legal mandates, the

President’s priorities, or the principles

set forth in this Executive Order.

Pursuant to the terms of this

Executive Order, EPA has determined

that this rule is not ‘‘significant’’ and is

therefore not subject to OMB review.

This action does not impose any

enforceable duty, or contain any

‘‘unfunded mandates’’ as described in

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Act

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), or require prior

consultation as specified by Executive

Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October 28,

1993), entitled Enhancing the

Intergovernmental Partnership, or

special consideration as required by

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,

February 16, 1994).

Pursuant to the requirements of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.

601–612), the Administrator has

determined that regulations establishing

new tolerances or raising tolerance

levels or establishing exemptions from

tolerance requirements do not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities. A

certification statement explaining the

factual basis for this determination was

published in the Federal Register of

May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: April 30, 1996.

Stephen L. Johnson,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is

amended as follows:

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

2. In § 180.449, by revising paragraph

(a) to read as follows:

§ 180.449 Avermectin B1 and its delta-8,9

isomer; tolerances for residues.

(a) Tolerances are established for the

combined residues of the insecticide

avermectin B1 [a mixture of avermectins

containing greater than or equal to 80%

avermectin B1a (5-O-demethyl

avermectin Al) and less than or equal to

20% avermectin Blb (5-O- demethyl-25-

de(1-methylpropyl)-25-(1-methylethyl)

avermectin Al)] and its delta-8,9-isomer

in or on the following commodities:

Commodity

Parts

per

million

Expiration

date

Cattle, fat ..................... 0.015 Apr.30,

1996

Cattle, meat ................. 0.02 Do

Cattle, mbyp ................ 0.02 Do

Citrus whole fruit ......... 0.02 Do

Cottonseed .................. 0.005 Do

Hops, dried .................. 0.5 Dec. 31,

1996

Milk .............................. 0.005 Apr. 30,

1996

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 96–11337 Filed 5–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CC Docket No. 91–281; DA 96–439]

Calling Number Identification

Service—Caller ID

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission (Commission).

ACTION: Final rule; waiver.

SUMMARY: The Common Carrier Bureau,

acting pursuant to delegated authority,

granted Sprint Communications Co.

(Sprint) a waiver of the Federal

Communications Commission’s calling

party number (CPN) delivery rules until

June 1, 1996. The Commission’s CPN

delivery rules require that common

carriers using Signaling System 7 are

required to transmit the CPN associated

with an interstate call to interconnecting

carriers. Sprint requested the waiver

because it needed additional time to

correct a technical problem in which the

privacy of a calling party might be

compromised. The Bureau conditioned

this waiver on Sprint providing two

progress reports to the Bureau. These

reports are to be provided not later than

April 15, 1996 and again on May 10,

1996. The intended effect of this action

is to avoid compromising the privacy of

callers.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Nightingale, Network Services

Division, Common Carrier Bureau at

202–418–2352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

summary describes the Bureau’s Order

in the matter of Rules and Policies

Regarding Calling Number Identification

Service, (CC Docket 91–281, adopted

March 27, 1996 and released March 29,

1995). The file is available for

inspection and copying during the

weekday hours of 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in

the Commission’s Reference Center,

Room 239, 1919 M St., NW.,

Washington DC, or copies may be

purchased from the Commission’s

duplicating contractor, ITS, Inc. 2100 M

St., NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC

20037, phone 202–857–3800.

Analysis of the Order

After reviewing Sprint’s petition for

stay and waiver of the Commission’s

rules governing calling party number

(CPN) delivery and privacy, the Bureau

has concluded to grant Sprint a

temporary waiver until June 1, 1996 of

Section 64.1601(a) and Section 64.103

of the Commission’s rules.

Sprint requested additional time to

comply with the Commission’s caller ID