alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cidk 

Saitta 

Pideu 

Pickering 

Parraguirre 

Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 

849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge 

Gordon & Rees, LLP 

Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP 

McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas 

Castle & Associates 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'In light of this order, petitioners' motion for a stay is denied. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A .1•:.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12041]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Virtual meeting. Note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will 
conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the 
meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual 
meeting, go to the Commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Motion to Amend Directive 68 to Include 
Additional Information in Quarterly Status Reports to Commission.
    Management and Administrative Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer. 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-12041 Filed 6-4-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of the Chief Exeutive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the annual report of Markland Technologies, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Delmar Kintner, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/S/ Delmar Kintner
---------------------------
NAME: Delmar Kintner
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
DATE:  OCTOBER 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bluesky Systems Corp. (the "Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Duane Bennett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 *   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Duane Bennett
 Duane Bennett
 President, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer, Controller
 
 November 22, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00460-CR

Jason Kyle Gee

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 271st District Court

of Wise County (CR18318)

April 6, 2017

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
J

- S49005

- 16

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.

STEVEN WYLIE

Appellant No. 1892 EDA 2015

Appeal from the PCRA Order entered June 18 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division, at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0011687

- 2010

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OLSON, J., and STEVENS, P.J.E. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED SEPTEMBER 02, 2016

In this appeal, Steven Wylie claims that the PCRA court erred in

dismissing his timely PCRA petition, which asserted that the mandatory

minimum sentences he received were illegal under Alleyne v. United

States , 133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013). Our Supreme Court recently held that

“ Alleyne does not apply retroactively to cases pending on collateral

review....” Commonwealth v. Washington , ___ A.3d ___, ___, 2016 WL

3909088, *8 (Pa., filed July 19, 2016). Wylie’s judgm ent of sentence,

therefore, is not illegal.

Order affirmed.

____________________________________________

 Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.J

- S49005

- 16

- 2

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 9/2/2016
No. 72-6076.

#### Esparza-Ramirez *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Bioengineering of Neuroscience, Vision and Low Vision Technologies 
Study Section, June 17, 2021, 08:00 a.m. to June 18, 2021, 07:00 p.m., 
National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register on May 
18, 2021, 86 FR 26930.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 18, 2021, in FR Doc 2021-10425, on 
page 26930, in the second column, under the Name of Committee: Emerging 
Technologies and Training Neurosciences Integrated Review Group; 
Bioengineering of Neuroscience, Vision and Low Vision Technologies 
Study Section heading, correct the ``Date'' to read June 16, 2021-June 
17, 2021. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 2, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-11842 Filed 6-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT NUMBER 4.52



                   AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                  KGE MANAGMEENT LTD. AND IMA EXPLORATION INC.
                              DATED JUNE 14, 2002


























                                                                             141

<PAGE>




IMA EXPLORATION INC.




June 14, 2002



Dr. Gerald G. Carlson
Copper Ridge Explorations Inc.
500 - 625 Howe St.
Vancouver, BC V6C 2T6


Dear Gerry:

Further to our  conversation regarding the contract renewal which  expired April
11, 2002, I would like to confirm the agreed points.

The  existing  contract  to  continue  for a period of six months  from the date
appearing  below,  at which time both parties have the option of  terminating or
making changes.

Should no communication  occur between the signing parties within 30 days of the
expiring date, the contract will,  therefore,  automatically  renew itself for a
period of six more months to a total of 12 months from the day of signing.

Sincerely,

IMA EXPLORATION INC.

/s/ Joseph Grosso

Joseph Grosso
President


                                /S/ Gerald Carlson                   18 Jun 02
                                -----------------------              ----------
                                Gerald G. Carlson                    Date






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Terminal City Club Tower, Suite709-837 West Hastings Street,
                         Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3N6
          Tel: 604.687.1828 Fax: 604.687.1858 Toll Free: 800.901.0058
       www.imaexploration.com E-Mail: info@imaexploration.com TSX-V: IMR


                                                                             142
Motion to Withdraw Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed

March 26 , 2015

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00889

- CR

NOE GERARDO MORIN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1306502



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found a ppellant guilty of murder. Appellant entered a plea of true to the enhancement paragraphs in the indictment, and the jury assessed punishment at life in prison. On September 26 , 20 1 3 , the trial court sentenced appellant to
confinement for life in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.2

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the

appe al is wholly frivolous and without merit. 1 The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advance d. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Te x. Crim. App. 1991). Counsel has complied with
the Anders procedures set out in Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). A copy of the appellate record was provided to appellant, and appellant was advised of the deadline to file any p ro se response to counsel’s brief. Appellant was granted two extensions of time to file a responsive brief. When the second extension was granted, the court noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. As of this date , more than sixty days
ha ve passed since the extended deadline and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is whol ly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We need not address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

1 Appellant’ s previous appointed counsel also filed an Anders brief, but new counsel was appointe d after the trial court determined that the previous counsel had not complied with the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967).3

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise. Do Not Publish

— T ex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILIBERTO BELLO SUAREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 73143

Agency No. A096

- 346

- 311

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 10, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Filiberto Bello Suarez, a native and citizen of Mexico , petition s pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings . Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen.

* This dispositio n is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 73143

Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F .3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and

dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Bello Suarez’s tenth motion

to reopen as untimely and number

- barred where the motion was filed more than

nine years after the BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) , and where he

failed to establish any of the regulatory exception s to the time and number

limitations for filing a motion to reopen

, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3). In light of our

disposition, we do not reach Bello Suarez’s remaining contentions regarding

hardship.

W e lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen sua sponte

where Bello Suarez fails to establish any legal or constitutional errors behind the

decision

. See Bonilla v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court

has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the

limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or

constitutional error.”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Bello Suarez’s contention that his case

warrants a favorable exercise of prosecutorial discretion. See Vilchiz

- Soto v.

Holder , 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order).

To the extent Bello Suarez seeks review of the BIA’s December 2006 order,

w e lack jurisdiction because this petition is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C.3 16

- 73143

§ 1252(b)( 1); Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995).

We do not consider the extra

- record evidence submitted with Bello Suarez’s

opening brief. See Dent v. Holder , 627 F.3d 365, 371 (9th Cir. 2010) (stating

standard for review of out

- of

- record evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DE NIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
EX-23
                     CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



John Spurgeon
PO Box 1171
Glendora, CA 91740

To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of John Spurgeon, Certified Public Accountant consents to the
inclusion of my report of December 31, 1999, on the Financial Statements of
Freedom Surf, Inc. from the inception date of August 2, 1997 through December
31, 1999, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future to be
filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


Professionally,

/s/ John Spurgeon
-------------------------
John Spurgeon, CPA
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, H. Dean Haley, the Executive Chairman,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Principal
Executive Officer of Power Air Corporation, and Alan Campbell, the Secretary,
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Power Air
Corporation, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
their knowledge, the Report on Form 10-QSB of Power Air Corporation, for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Power Air
Corporation.

Date:        February 14,
2008.

/s/ H. Dean Haley H. Dean Haley Executive
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and
Principal Executive Officer



/s/ Alan Campbell Alan Campbell Secretary,
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Power Air
Corporation and will be retained by Power Air Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT
31.1
 
 Certifications
 
 I, Duane
Bennett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify
that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BlueSky Systems,
Corp.
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which do
not apply); and
 
 Date:
August 17, 2008
  /s/ Duane
Bennett
 Duane
Bennett
#### Joseph YEAGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 49943.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 7, 1995.

Raymond L. Legg, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from dismissal of Rule 29.15 motion.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant. Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64877, 66810.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 27, 1995.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Anthony Williams, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction of second degree robbery and the denial of his Rule 29.16 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence. Further, the denial of Defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing was not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.26(b).
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
AdZone Research, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-123883, 333-130145 and
333-128340) of our report dated July 10, 2006 with respect to our audit of the
financial statements of AdZone Research, Inc. as of March 31, 2006, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AdZone Research, Inc. for
the year ended March 31, 2006.


/s/ Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP

Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP
Exhibit 10.47


    
      
        

      

    

                                                                            Exhibit
      10.47

    September
      22, 2006

    


    


    


    The
      Honorable Gabrielle K. McDonald

    2001
      Holcombe Boulevard, #3201

    Houston,
      Texas 77030

    


    


    Dear
      Judge McDonald:

    


    Supplemental
      Agreement to the

    Consulting
      Agreement of November 1, 1999

    


    This
      Supplemental Agreement refers to the consulting agreement of November 1, 1999
      (the "Consulting Agreement"), with the undersigned, FM Services Company (the
      "Company"), with respect to your performance of consulting services for the
      Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates.

    


    By
      way of
      this Supplemental Agreement, the Company would like to extend your Consulting
      Agreement from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. All other terms and
      conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall remain unchanged. 

    


    Please
      confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding with respect
      to this matter by signing both originals of this Supplemental Agreement and
      returning one to me.

    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    /s/
      Richard C. Adkerson 

    


    Richard
      C. Adkerson

    Chairman
      of the Board and President

    FM
      Services Company

    


    


    AGREED
      TO AND ACCEPTED:

    


    


    BY:
       /s/
      Gabrielle K. McDonald  

    The
      Honorable Gabrielle K. McDonald

    


    DATE:  September
      27, 2006