alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than June 17, 2021.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *WaterStone Bank SSB 2015 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Waterstone Bank SSB 401(K) Plan;*                     to acquire voting shares of WaterStone Financial, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of WaterStone Bank, all of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 27, 2021.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-11588 Filed 6-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

North Shore Capital III, Inc.
Dated: February 20, 2002


I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report to
Shareholders on Form 10-KSB of my report dated December 31, 2001 appearing on
page F-2 of North Shore's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2001. I also consent to the reference to me under the heading
"Exhibits" in such Registration Statement.



                                        DENNIS W. BERSCH, CPA
                                        /s/ Dennis W. Bersch

                                        ------------------------------------
                                        DENNIS BERSCH, CPA
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jesse Alan Le B arron

, * From the 441st District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR49073

.

Vs

. No. 11

- 2 0

- 00 021

- CR * August 31 , 20 2 2

The State of Texas, * Memorand um Opinion by Trotter, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J., and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this

cou rt’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 19463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9667]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE

TIME AND DATE: Friday, April 28, 1995, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.; Saturday, April 
29, 1995, 9 a.m.-noon.

PLACE: State Justice Institute, 1650 King Street, Suite 600, 
Alexandria, VA 22314.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: FY 1995 grant requests and internal Institute 
business.

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: Board discussion of grant requests and 
internal business, except those matters noted below.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Internal personnel matters; Board 
committee meetings.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David I. Tevelin, Executive 
Director, State Justice Institute, 1650 King Street, Suite 600, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22314, (703) 684-6100.
David I. Tevelin,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-9667 Filed 4-14-95; 1:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-SC-M
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-03T05:47:33Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-03T05:47:35Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-03T05:47:35Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="80191">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-03T05:47:33Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
</p>
<p>AUSTIN </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">Homtrable Wy i. Hatlain « page 2

agihde . .
We e060 no reason fer chancing our former
opinion.
Very traly yours
ATTORNSX GENERAL GF TAXAS
®F ae
Ut, Ue bareus
Auelotant
Gti~em

APPROVEDAUG 31
7 TTPFOVEDAUG 31, 1042 |

ATTORNEY GENERAL, OF TEXAS

APPROVED
OPINICTM:
COMMIT

VEY.
CHAT
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioForce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory D. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gregory D. Brown

Gregory D. Brown

Chief Financial Officer

August 29, 2008







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q/A solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q/A or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10945]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,976]


Hudson Valley Tree, Incorporated, a/k/a Norma International 
Newburgh, New York; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 
15, 1995, applicable to all workers of Hudson Valley Tree, 
Incorporated, Newburgh, New York. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on May 25, 1995 (60 FR 27793).
    The State Agency reports that on January 1, 1996, a successor 
employer, Norma International, took over production operations at the 
subject firm. The workers are engaged in employment related to the 
production artificial Christmas trees, wreaths and garland.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Hudson Valley Tree, Incorporated who were adversely affected 
by increased imports. Accordingly, the Department is amending the 
certification for workers of the subject firm to indicate the successor 
employer.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,976 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Hudson Valley Tree, Incorporated, a/k/a Norma 
International, Newburgh, New York who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after April 20, 1994 are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 8th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-10945 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v LeRoy Rushie, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered April 12, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*734Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s conviction arose out of his sale of cocaine to an undercover police officer in New Rochelle on April 30, 1987, and May 1, 1987. The undercover police officer, who had seen the defendant on prior occasions in New Rochelle, identified him during the trial as the seller of the drugs. An informant arranged the first transaction, but was not present at the time of the actual sales. Under these circumstances, there is no merit to the defendant’s argument that the court should have given a missing witness charge with respect to the informant *(see, People v Dianda,*70 NY2d 894; *People v Paulin,*70 NY2d 685; *People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424).

The defendant further argues that the informant’s identity should have been disclosed. However, this argument has not been preserved for appellate review, and, in any event, is without merit under the circumstances, *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Goggins,*34 NY2d 163; *People v Chavis,*113 AD2d 896).

Contrary to the defendant’s argument, the prosecutor did not improperly elicit testimony from him concerning a prior arrest which was not the subject of the court’s earlier *Sandoval*ruling. The defendant admitted the circumstances regarding this arrest freely and voluntarily during his cross-examination, in response to the prosecutor’s question, "And why is it that you stopped boxing professionally?”

We have examined the defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review or without merit *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137; *People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105, 109; *People v James,*146 AD2d 712). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10079]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1995--Rev., Supp. No. 11]


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds Termination of 
Authority: The Personal Service Insurance Company

    Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by 
the Treasury to The Personal Service Insurance Company, of Columbus, 
Ohio, under the United States Code, Title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to 
qualify as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated 
effective today.
    The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal 
bonds at 60 FR 34445, July 1, 1995.
    With respect to any bonds currently in force with The Personal 
Service Insurance Company, bond-approving officers may let such bonds 
run to expiration and need not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds 
should be accepted from the Company. In addition, bonds that are 
continuous in nature should not be renewed.
    The Circular may be viewed or downloaded through the Internet 
(http://www.ustreas.gov/treasury/bureaus/finman/c570.html) or 
computerized public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 
874-6817/7034/6953/6872. A hard copy may also be purchased from the 
Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-
1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock 
number: 048-000-00489-0.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F04, Hyattsville, MD 20872, telephone (202/FTS) 874-6507.

    Dated: April 8, 1996.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 96-10079 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1570** 
STEVEN BENEZRA, individually; MELISSA YORK, individually , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,
v. ZACKS INVESTMENT RESEARCH, INC., inclusive, individually; ZACKS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC., inclusive, individually; LEONARD HARVEY ZACKS, inclusive, individually; BENJAMIN LAIB ZACKS, inclusive, individually; MITCHEL ETHAN ZACKS, inclusive, individually , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Cou rt for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00596

- TDS

- LPA )

Submitted : November 30, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Paul A. Demontesquiou, THE LAW OFFICES OF WALSH & DEMONTESQUIOU, Marvin, North Carolina, for Appellant s . Tobias S. Hampson, David N. Jonson, WYRICK, ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee s .
Unpu blished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Steven Benezra and Melissa York seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their request for a hearing, compelling arbitration, and staying the case pending arbitration
. Sect ion 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act governs appellate review of arbitration orders. 9 U.S.C. § 16 (2006)
. Section 16(a)(3) provides that “[ a ] n appeal may be taken from

. . . a final decision with respect to an arbitration. ” However, § 16(b)(1) provi des that “ an appeal may not be taken from an interlocutory order
. . . granting a stay of any action under section 3 of this title
. ” The order Benezra seeks to appeal is not a final decision with respect to an arbitration, but rather an interlocutory order granting a stay. See Green Tree Fin
. Corp.

- Ala
. v. Randolph , 531 U.S. 79, 87 n.2 (2000)
. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and leg al contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2080

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION; EQUIFAX

CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 97-2376

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-1969-S)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: Janury 7, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Moss Wood, IV,

NEUBERGER, QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; Michael N. Russo, Jr., FERGUSON, SCHETELICH, HEFFERNAN &

MURDOCK, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In No. 97-2080, Appellant appeals the district court's order

denying his motion for recusal and the district court's marginal

order denying his motion to amend his complaint and for appointment

of counsel. Although Appellant's appeal of the district court's

order denying his motions was interlocutory when filed, it is now

ripe because the district court entered final judgment prior to

this court's review of the appeal. See Equipment Finance Group,

Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347 (4th Cir.

1992). In No. 97-2376, Appellant appeals the district court's order

denying his motion for summary judgment, granting Appellee's motion

for summary judgment, and dismissing Appellant's complaint for

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit, No. CA97-1969-S (D. Md. Aug. 6, 1997; Sept. 24, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Bridget A. HOFLER, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 94-SC-76-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

March 24, 1994.

Martin J. Huelsmann, Fort Mitchell, for Hofler.

Scott D. Majors, Kentucky Bar Association, Frankfort, for Kentucky Bar Ass’n.

OPINION AND ORDER

The Kentucky Bar Association commenced this disciplinary proceeding by charging the movant, Bridget A. Hofler, with violating SCR 3.130-1.3 and 3.130-1.4(a) by her unreasonable delay in filing a civil complaint, her failure to promptly pursue the matter once the complaint was filed, and her failure to keep her client reasonably informed about the status of the matter.

The movant admits she failed to timely file the complaint and to litigate the matter in a timely fashion with adequate notice to the client of the course of litigation. She further admits that her conduct violated SCR 3.130-1.3 and 3.130-1.4(a).

The movant offers to accept a public reprimand and requests this court terminate the disciplinary proceedings pending against her. She has reimbursed her client the amount of the client’s initial retainer; her client has now received a refund of essentially all fees previously paid, despite the fact that the withdrawn as record counsel in the underlying civil action and the Kenton Circuit Court has permitted the client a reasonable period of time to obtain successor counsel.

In light of these facts, and further considering movant’s substantial psychological evidence to be considered in mitigation, the Kentucky Bar Association does not object to the issuance of a public reprimand and a termination of the disciplinary proceedings and submits that this is a just result.

Having reviewed the record, we find that the evidence supports the recommendation of the Kentucky Bar Association. Bridget A. Hofler is hereby publicly reprimanded. Disciplinary proceedings pending against mov-ant shall be terminated and the cost thereof shall be paid by movant in accordance with SCR 3.450(1).

All concur.

ENTERED: MARCH 24, 1994

/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice
Order issued October( i .2012

In The 

### (tnirt uf pcahi 

## Fift1! Jiiitrirt nf xwi at Jat1ai No. 05-10-01375-CV IN THE iNTEREST OF C.H.C. AND S.M.C., CHILDREN 

### ORDER Appcllcc asserts in his brief that the trial court has appointed a parenting facilitator. Accordingly, we ORDER the Collin County District Clerk to file a supplemental transcript by October26, 2012 containing either anyorderororders appointing aparenting facilitatororaverified statement by the clcrk that there is no order appointing a parenting facilitator in this c’s

JIM MOSELEY PRESIDIIG JUSTICE /
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**The Board of Directors of  The SCO Group, Inc.We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-43822, 333-97865,333-100105, 333-124101, 333-124102, 333-131349, 333-131350,333-140285 and 333-140256 on Form S-8 and Registration StatementNos. 333-130609 and 333-116732 on Form S-3 of The SCOGroup, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheetsof The SCO Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (debtors-in-possession) as of October 31, 2007 and 2006,and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity,and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2007, and thefinancial statement schedule as of and for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, whichreport appears elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K of The SCO Group, Inc. Our report datedJanuary 28, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to uncertainties as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern./s/ Tanner LCSalt Lake City, Utah