alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19607-19608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9652]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION


Availability of Environmental Assessments

    Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332, the Commission has prepared and made 
available environmental assessments for the proceedings listed below. 
Dates environmental assessments are available are listed below for each 
individual proceeding. [[Page 19608]] 
    To obtain copies of these environmental assessments contact Ms. 
Tawanna Glover-Sanders, Interstate Commerce Commission, Section of 
Environmental Analysis, Room 3219, Washington, DC 20423, (202) 927-
6203.
    Comments on the following assessment are due 15 days after the date 
of availability:

AB-88 (Sub-No. 7X), Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company--
Abandonment Exemption--In Armstrong and Butler Counties, PA. EA 
available 4/7/95.
AB-290 (Sub-No. 169X), Norfolk and Western Railway Company--
Abandonment--Between Ferguson Junction and Glen Echo, Missouri. EA 
available 4/7/95.
AB-290 (Sub-No. 163X), Central of Georgia Railway Company--
Abandonment--at Atlanta, Georgia. EA available 4/11/95.
AB-290 (Sub No. 158X), Norfolk Southern Railway Company--Abandonment--
at Elberton, GA. EA available 4/14/95.
AB-290 (Sub-No. 152X), Norfolk Southern Railway Company--Abandonment--
At Blanch, Caswell County, NC. EA available 4/14/95.

    Comments on the following assessment are due 30 days after the date 
of availability:

AB-3 (Sub-No. 122X), Missouri Pacific Railroad Company--Abandonment 
Exemption--In Saline County, Kansas (Trigo Industrial Lead). EA 
available 4/14/95.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9652 Filed 4-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1318

WILLIAM L. BARRETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-93-620-5-F)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 14, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William L. Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his medical malpractice claim filed under the Federal Tort

Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 1994), and denying his

motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barrett v. United

States, No. CA-93-620-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 1995, Jan. 18, 1995,

Feb. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Billy Vance HAMILTON, Jr., Relator, v. Honorable Bob W. ROBERTSON, Judge of 308th District Court of Harris County, Texas, Respondent.

No. 01-88-00693-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

Aug. 31, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1989.

*475Billy Vance Hamilton, pro se.

Barry Boorstein, Houston, for respondent.

Before SMITH, COHEN and STEPHANOW, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Relator, Billy Vance Hamilton, Jr., asks this Court to vacate the respondent’s order of May 11, 1988, which sustained the district clerk’s contest to relator’s pauper affidavit.

Tex.R.App.P. 121, which details the requisite for a petition for writ of mandamus, provides, in pertinent part:

> (C) The petition shall set forth in a concise and positive manner all facts that are necessary to establish relator’s right to the relief sought. It shall be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of the order complained of and other relevant exhibits.

> (D) The petition shall state the relief sought and the basis for the relief, as well as the compelling circumstances which establish the necessity for the writ to issue.

Relator has provided only a copy of respondent’s order. No other relevant exhibits have been provided. Relator refers to several documents in his petition, but these documents have not been provided to this Court. Nor has relator provided a statement of facts from the hearing on the contest.

Review of an order sustaining the contest of a pauper’s affidavit is focused upon “whether an examination of the record as a whole establishes that the trial judge abused his discretion in sustaining the contest.” *King v. Payne,*156 Tex. 105, 292 S.W.2d 331 (1956). Relator has not provided any record; he, therefore, cannot establish that the respondent abused his discretion.

Relator also complains of respondent’s imposition of monetary sanctions. Respondent found “the affidavit to proceed under pauper’s oath was brought in bad faith” and imposed sanctions of $500. Respondent also ordered that no other motions, except appeal motions, be filed until the sanctions were paid in full.

Tex.R.Civ.P. 13 mandates that the signature of a party on a pleading constitutes “a certificate” that “to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry the instrument is not groundless and brought in bad faith or groundless and brought for the purpose of harassment.” Rule 13 provides that “if a pleading, motion or other paper is signed in violation of this rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, shall impose sanctions available under Rule 215-2b ...”

Tex.R.Civ.P. 215 allows the trial court to impose various sanctions under appropriate circumstances. Rule 215 permits both types of sanctions imposed by respondent.

Relator has failed to demonstrate that respondent abused his discretion in the imposition of sanctions.

Relator’s motion for leave to file a petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition is overruled.
EXHIBIT
32.1
  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlueSky Systems, Corp. (the
"Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Duane Bennett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify that:
 
 *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  
 /s/ Duane Bennett
 Duane
Bennett
 President,
Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer, Controller
 
 November
13, 2008
 
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5426 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5426

 To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
 provide a link to resources for submitting reports on suspected fraud 
                  relating to certain COVID-19 loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2023

 Ms. Van Duyne (for herself and Mr. Landsman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
 provide a link to resources for submitting reports on suspected fraud 
                  relating to certain COVID-19 loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WEBSITE TO REPORT FRAUD RELATING TO CERTAIN COVID-19 LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration shall include on the primary website of the 
Administration a link to a website of the Office of the Inspector 
General of the Small Business Administration regarding reporting fraud, 
waste, abuse, mismanagement, and misconduct, and containing a resource 
for individuals to report suspected cases of fraud with respect to a 
covered loan to the Administration.
    (b) Covered Loan Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
loan'' means--
            (1) a loan made under paragraph (36) or (37) of section 
        7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)); or
            (2) a loan made under section 7(b) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 
        636(b)) in response to COVID-19 during the covered period (as 
        defined in section 1110(a) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9009)).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 111 (Friday, June 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12295]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Number: PR21-49-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Energy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(2)+(g): BHEA SOC Filing 
to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/1/2021.
    Accession Number: 202106015185.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/22/2021.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/2021.

    Docket Number: PR21-50-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): Estimated Fuel 
Adjustment to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/2/2021.
    Accession Number: 202106025108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/23/2021.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/2021.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-886-000.
    Applicants: Rover Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Summary of Negotiated Rate 
Capacity Release Agreements on 6-2-21 to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210602-5034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/14/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-890-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TPC 2021-06-03 Negotiated Rate 
Agreements to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/3/21.
    Accession Number: 20210603-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-904-002.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Description: Pre-Arranged/Pre-Agreed (Amended Stipulation and 
Agreement of Settlement) Filing of Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Filed Date: 6/4/21.
    Accession Number: 20210604-5180.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/11/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 7, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-12295 Filed 6-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the BlastGard International, Inc. (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





|               |                        
|-------------- | -----------------------
|April 14, 2009
|               |                        
|/s/            | MICHAEL J. GORDON      
|               | Michael J. Gordon      
|               | Chief Financial Officer
#### Sanford J. GUBERNIK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STEINBERG & CROTZER, et al., Defendants/Respondents.

No. 61973.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 29, 1992.

Sanford J. Gubernik, pro se.

James J. Hennelly, Lashley & Baer, P.C., St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his petition which attempted to allege malpractice by his former attorneys. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MITCHELL TAEBEL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

COUNTY OF MARICOPA; DOUG

DUCEY, AZ Governor; MARK

BRNOVICH, Attorney General, AZ

Attorney General; MARICOPA COUNTY

OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE

SERVICES; MARICOPA COUNTY

PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE;

DONALD J. TRUMP; WILLIAM G.

MONTGOMERY, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-16919

D.C. No. 

2:21-cv-01294-ROS-CDB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 16, 2022 ** 

San Francisco, California

FILED

AUG 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 *

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 * * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Mitchell Taebel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment and order

of dismissal for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Taebel

brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various government officials

following his arrest and detention. We dismiss the appeal. 

Taebel’s Opening Brief does not comply with the briefing rules set forth in

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28, Ninth Circuit Rule 28-1, or Ninth Circuit

Rule 28-2. Taebel did not even use the Ninth Circuit’s Informal Opening Brief

form. See 9th Cir. R. 28-1(c). In addition, while we are not required to consider

the merits, even construing Taebel’s Opening Brief liberally,1 it does not make a

meritorious argument, and the district court did not err2 in dismissing his Second

Amended Complaint. See N/S Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 127 F.3d 1145,

1146–47 (9th Cir. 1997); Greenwood v. F.A.A., 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994).

Thus, we strike Taebel’s Opening Brief and dismiss the appeal. See N/S

Corp., 127 F.3d at 1146–47; Stevens v. Sec. Pac. Nat’l. Bank, 538 F.2d 1387, 1389 

1

 Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013).

2

 Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012).

2 21-16919
(9th Cir. 1976); cf. Carter v. Comm’r., 784 F.2d 1006, 1008–09 (9th Cir. 1986).

DISMISSED.

3 21-16919
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, William Dwyer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Raser Technologies, Inc., (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ William Dwyer      
|                        |  |  |  | William Dwyer,         
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5824 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5824

      To provide for continued operation of the Federal Aviation 
        Administration in the event of a lapse in appropriation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2023

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for continued operation of the Federal Aviation 
        Administration in the event of a lapse in appropriation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUED OPERATION OF FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION.

    In the case of a lapse in appropriations for the Federal Aviation 
Administration, there are appropriated such amounts as may be necessary 
for the operation of such Administration for the lesser of--
            (1) 30 days; or
            (2) the duration of the lapse in appropriation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Stream Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Bossert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    By: /s/ Donald Bossert__________ Donald Bossert 
      Chief Financial Officer   November 19, 2013_____
Notice of Extension of Term of Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TERM OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  

			
	To:	 	David E. Hooston
	From:	 	Frank J. Mercardante, as authorized by PLSB Board at its meeting held on October 26, 2006
		
	Date:	 	October 30, 2006

 This is to notify you that on behalf of Placer Sierra Bancshares (the “Company”), as
authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors at its meeting held on October 26, 2006, the Company has exercised its right to extend the term of your employment through December 31, 2009, pursuant to paragraph 1 of the Employment
Agreement between you and Company, dated January 1, 2003. 
  

			
	“COMPANY”
	PLACER SIERRA BANCSHARES
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frank J. Mercardante

		 	Frank J. Mercardante
		 	Chief Executive Officer