alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 88 (Monday, May 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11125]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-475-059]


Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape From Italy; Termination of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of termination of antidumping duty administrative 
review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 16, 1995, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published in the Federal Register (60 FR 57573) the notice 
of initiation of the administrative review of the antidumping duty 
finding on pressure sensitive plastic tape from Italy. We are 
terminating this review as a result of the timely withdrawal by the 
petitioner, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) of its 
request for the review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 6, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Peterson, Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone: 
(202) 482-4195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On October 30, 1995, 3M requested an administrative review for 3M 
Italia S.p.A. of the antidumping duty finding on pressure sensitive 
plastic tape from Italy for the period October 1, 1994, through 
September 30, 1995, pursuant to 19 CFR 353.22(a)(2). On November 16, 
1995, the Department published in the Federal Register (60 FR 57573) 
the notice of initiation of that administrative review. 3M timely 
withdrew its request for a review on February 5, 1996, pursuant to 19 
CFR 353.22(a)(5). As a result, the Department is terminating this 
review.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675) and 19 CFR 
353.22(a)(5).

    Dated: March 21, 1996.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 96-11125 Filed 5-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF HEALTH
BENEFITS DIRECT CORPORATION REQUIRED


BY RULE
13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Health Benefits Direct Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anthony R. Verdi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on my
knowledge:





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August
16, 2010





/s/ ANTHONY R. VERDIAnthony
      R. VerdiChief
      Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10040]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than May 8, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. William and Elsie Giron, Belen, New Mexico; to acquire an 
additional 2.15 percent, for a total of 11.7 percent of the voting 
shares of The Bank of Belen, Belen, New Mexico.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 18, 
1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-10040 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Taohuayuan Culture Tourism
Co., Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Cai Danmei,
the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                          NEW TAOHUAYUAN CULTURE TOURISM CO.,
                                          LTD.



June 21, 2008                             By:  /s/ Cai Danmei
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Cai Danmei, Chief Executive
                                               Officer and Principal Financial
                                               and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 21.1
 The SCO Group, Inc. Listing of Subsidiaries
 OwnershipSubsidiary
    
    Location
    
    InterestSCO Operations, Inc.
    
    United States
    
    Wholly ownedSCO Global, Inc.
    
    United States
    
    Wholly ownedSCO Software (UK) Ltd.
    
    United Kingdom
    
    Wholly ownedSCO Japan, Ltd.
    
    Japan
    
    Wholly ownedSCO Canada, Inc.
    
    Canada
    
    Wholly ownedThe SCO Group (Deutschland) GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    Wholly ownedThe SCO Group (France) Sarl
    
    France
    
    Wholly ownedSCO Software (India) Private Ltd.
    
    India
    
    Wholly ownedME Inc.
    
    United States
    
    Wholly ownedCattleback Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.
    
    United States
    
    Wholly owned
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Terry Fields, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Uniontown Energy
      Inc. for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Uniontown Energy Inc.                                                                   

Dated: March 17, 2011

| | /s/ Terry Fields                                                   
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Terry Fields                                                       
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer, 
| | Secretary, Treasurer and Director                                  
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and
| | Principal Accounting Officer)                                      
| | UNIONTOWN ENERGY INC.                                              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Uniontown Energy
Inc. and will be retained by Uniontown Energy Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT TO INVESTOR RELATIONS AGREEMENT










Tara Minerals Corp. and Roadshows Intl. Inc. agree to amend their Agreement, a copy of which is attached, as follows:




1.

The compensation for the services to be provided by Roadshows Intl. will be 30,000 shares of Tara Minerals common stock and 22,500 Euros.  No options will be issued by Tara Minerals for the services to be provided by Roadshows Intl.




2.

Roadshows Intl. will pay Tara Minerals $1,500 for the shares.  The shares will be issued after payment has been received.  The shares will be issued in the name of Stefan Huber.




Agreed to and accepted as of January 26, 2010.




TARA MINERALS CORP.







By:

/s/ Francis R Biscan 

Francis R. Biscan, President










ROADSHOWS INTL. INC.







By:

/s/ Stefan Huber

Stefan Huber

























TM Amendment to Agree 2-3-10
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40492 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOE DELL STERLING , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10

- CR

- 263

- 3

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and DENNIS and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joe Dell Sterling, federal prisoner # 18324

- 078, challenges the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, urging that the district court erred in determining that he was ineligible for a sentencing reduction

. He asserts that his sentence was tied to a guidelines range as his factual resume stipulated that he was aware that the conspiracy involved 1000 kilograms or more of marijuana, which resulted in the same base offense level as was used by the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 11, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40492 Document: 00514304728 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2018No. 17

- 40492

2 probation officer. As a result, Sterling contends that his sentence, which exceeded the guidelines range calculated by the probation officer, constituted an upward departure and that he was entitled to a commensurate departure under the newly applicable guidelines range. As the district court determined, appellant was not eligib le for a reduction because his sentence was not “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(2). Rather, the district court sentenced appellant to 240 months in prison based on his binding agree ment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). See Freeman v. United States , 564 U.S. 522, 534

- 40 (2011) (Sotomayor, J., concurring); United States v. Benitez , 822 F.3d 807, 809

- 12 (5th Cir. 2016). Therefore, the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction is AFFIRMED. See Freeman , 564 U.S. at 534

- 40 (Sotomayor, J., concurring);
Benitez , 822 F.3d at 809

- 12. Case: 17-40492 Document: 00514304728 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2018
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael HUNTER, Defendant/Appellant. Michael HUNTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 67575, 68604.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 23, 1996.

Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury for attempted second degree burglary, §§ 564.011 and 569.170, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a five year prison term. The direct appeal in this case was consolidated with movant’s appeal of the motion court’s dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claim of error on direct appeal to be without merit. Defendant addresses no points on appeal to the motion court’s dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion. That appeal is considered abandoned. *State v. Nelson,*818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991). An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the *194
      *reasons for*this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of CenterPoint Energy
Transition Bond Company II, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, President
(Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gary L. Whitlock
-------------------------------------
Gary L. Whitlock
President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 7, 2006
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of OC Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H.
Stewart Fitz Gibbon III, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



Date:  March 25, 2005

/s/ H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III
------------------------------
H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

                                       21
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Stokes, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), both rendered August 30, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) under indictment No. 7901/87, upon a jury verdict, and robbery in the third degree (two counts) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), under indictment No. 7925/87, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentences.

*740Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

At approximately 5:00 p.m. on November 11, 1987, the defendant accosted four youths, accused them of robbing his nephew, demanded that they accompany him to be identified by the nephew, and threatened to shoot them if they did not comply. After marching the group down several streets in Queens for approximately 30 minutes, the defendant ordered them to stop and demanded all their money and jewelry. All four youths separately identified the defendant in lineups as the robber.

At approximately 9:45 p.m. on May 19, 1987, the defendant accused two other youths of robbing his nephew, and, threatening to shoot them with a gun concealed inside his jacket, marched them several blocks for approximately 30 minutes, ostensibly looking for his nephew at the home of a female relation. Finally, threatening to shoot them, the defendant took the boys’ money and disappeared. These two victims also picked the defendant out of a lineup.

On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court’s identification charge deprived him of a fair trial, and that his sentences are excessive. The defendant’s contentions are without merit.

We note at the outset that the defendant failed to object to the portion of the trial court’s charge complained of on appeal, with the result that the issue is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Nuccie,*57 NY2d 818). In any event, the court’s charge—which contained the observation that a witness’s memory for faces may be better in some circumstances than in others, as well as instructions on how to assess a witness’s reliability—was entirely proper, comporting with both common sense and the law.

Given the defendant’s repeated display of "total disregard of our laws and the rights of his fellow citizens” *(People v Terry,*117 AD2d 761, 762), we find that the sentences imposed are appropriate and should not be disturbed *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

A supplemental *pro se*brief has been filed which sets forth the arguments of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We have thoroughly reviewed these arguments and find them to be without merit *(see, People v Stokes,*162 AD2d 737 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50399 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. BAYRON G LOPEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:07-CR-361-ALL
Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Bayron G. Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). The Go vernment’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 8, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
#### Peggy J. TAYLOE, Respondent, v. PARKWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67663.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Sept. 26, 1995.

Kim M. Fenton, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for appellant.

John J. Larsen, Jr., Larsen & Larsen, St. Louis, for respondent Peggy J. Tayloe.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Laura J. Newberry, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent Treasurer of the State of Mo.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

Employer appeals from award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission of permanent and total disability of employee as a result of an injury to her right knee while engaged in her employment as a bus driver. The award of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

Award of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19266-19267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10753]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Department 
of Energy/Los Alamos National Laboratory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Los Alamos National Laboratory.

DATES: Wednesday, May 15, 1996: 6:30 pm-9:30 pm; 7:00 pm to 7:30 pm 
(public comment session).

ADDRESSES: Santa Clara Pueblo, Kee Street, Santa Clara Pueblo, 
Espanola, New Mexico 87532, 505-753-7330.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kimberly Roybal, Los Alamos 
National Laboratory Citizens' Advisory Board Support, Northern New 
Mexico Community College, 1002 Onate Street, Espanola, NM 87352, (800) 
753-8970, or (505) 753-8970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose of the Board

    The purpose of the Advisory Board is to make recommendations to DOE 
and its regulators in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

Wednesday, May 15, 1996

6:30 PM  Call to Order and Welcome
7:00 PM  Public Comment
8:00 PM  Work Plan Discussion
8:30 PM  Sub-Committee Reports
9:30 PM  Adjourn

Public Participation

    The meeting is open to the public. Written statements may be filed 
with the Committee either before or after the meeting. Individuals who 
wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should contact 
Ms. Roybal, at the telephone number listed above. Requests must be 
received 5 days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be 
made to include the presentation in the agenda. The Designated Federal 
Official is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.

Minutes

    The minutes of this meeting will be available for public review and 
copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 1E-190, 
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585 
between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal holidays. 
Minutes will also be available by writing to Herman Le-Doux, Department 
of Energy, Los Alamos Area Office, 528 35th Street, Los Alamos, NM 
87185-5400.


[[Page 19267]]


    Issued at Washington, DC on April 24, 1996.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-10753 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P