2004 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

2-11-2004 

# Y oun g blo o d v . D e W eese
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 03-1722

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2004 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du

. Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" Y oun g b lood v . D e W e e s e " (2004). 2004 D e cisio n s . P ape r 957. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004/957PRECE DENTI AL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE TH IRD CIR CU IT

No. 03-1722
ROSITA C. YOUNGBLOOD; PARENTS UNITED FOR BE TTER S CHOOLS, INC .; PENN- KNOX NEIGHBO RHOO D ASSOC IATION; BUDD H OUSE INC; EDI TH WEEKS, Reve ren d; EDWINA BAKER

v. H. WILL IAM DEWE ESE; MICHAE L VEON, Ap pellan ts
App eal from th e Un ited States District Co urt for the Easte rn D istrict of P enns ylvania (D.C. Civi l Action No. 02-cv-07683) Distri ct Judge: Honorable J. Curtis Joyne r
Argued October 29, 2003 Be for e: S CIR ICA , Chief Judge , NY GA AR D a nd A M BR O, Circuit Judges (Opinion fi led December 18, 2003 )

And re ' L. De nnis, Esqu ire Daniell e Banks, Esqui re (Argued) Stradl ey, Ronon, Stevens & Young 260 O ne Co mm erce Squ are Philadelphia, PA 19103 Attorn ey for A ppella nts
Anthony L. Ci anfrani , Esquire (Argued)2 Suite 1920 1500 Walnut Stre et Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorneyfor Appellees ORDER A MENDI NG SL IP OPI NIO N AM BR O, Circuit

Judge It i s now ordered that thepublis hed Opinion in t he above case fi led December 18, 2003, be amended as follows: On page 8 of the sl ip opini on, three li nes from the top of the page, replac e the word “is” with the word “are ” so that the phras e reads: “house members are“within t he sph ere ...” On page 8 of the sl ip opini on, fivelines from the bottom of the ful l paragr aph, after the ci te 528, replac e the l ong dash (“—”) with a se mi-colon, followed bya space (“; ”). On page 8 of the sl ip opini on, in t he last sentenceof the ful l paragr aph repla ce the word “is” with the word “are” so the sentence reads: “Represent ative s DeWeese and Veon’s “deli berati ve and communicati ve processe s” in t

he course of exe rcis ing that legis lati ve authori tyare, ther efo re, p rivile ged fro m ju dicia l scru tiny.” On page 9 of the sl ip opini on, in t he firs t sentence under se ction V, the Conclusi on, replac e the words “i s a” with “are” and add an “s ” to theword “act” so t hat thesentence reads: “We hold that Repr esentat ives DeWeese and Veon’s act s of all ocati ng the General Assembly ’s offi ce-st affing appr opriation among indi vidual Re pre sen tativ es a re leg islativ e ac ts to w hich legis lativ e im mu nity ex tend s.” By the C ourt, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circui t Judge Dated: February 11, 2004