alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 462 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5712 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 220 Fremont Street in Kiel, Wisconsin, as 

the ‘‘Trooper Trevor J. Casper Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TROOPER TREVOR J. CASPER POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 220 Fremont Street in Kiel, Wis7 consin, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Trooper 

8 Trevor J. Casper Post Office Building’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5712 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Trooper Trevor J. 

5 Casper Post Office Building’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 462 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5712 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Trooper Trevor J. Casper al Service located at 220 Fremont Street in Kiel, 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Richard J. LampenRichard J. LampenChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10955]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Haggar Clothing Company; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the 
Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on June 7, 1995, 
applicable to all workers at the subject firm. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on June 21, 1995 (60 FR 32347). The 
certification for workers of the subject firm was amended June 20, 
1995, to show that some of the Robstown workers had their unemployment 
insurance (UI) taxes paid to Greenville Pant Manufacturing Company. The 
amended notice was published in the Federal Register on June 29, 1995, 
(60 FR 33849).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations have occurred at other production facilities of the 
subject firm, Edinburg Manufacturing Company, a/k/a Waxahachie Garment 
Company, Edinburg, Texas, and Weslaco Manufacturing Company, a/k/a 
Bowie Manufacturing Company, Weslaco, Texas. The workers at the 
Edinburg plant produce men's pants, and the workers in Weslaco are 
engaged in employment related to the production of men's pants and 
coats.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the Haggar Clothing Company who were adversely affected by 
increased imports from Mexico or Canada. Accordingly, the Department is 
amending the certification to include all workers of the Haggar 
Clothing Company production facilities in Edinburg and Weslaco, Texas.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--00444 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of workers of Haggar Clothing Company, Robstown 
Manufacturing Company, a/k/a Greenville Pant Manufacturing Company, 
located in Robstown, Texas (NAFTA-00444); Edinburg Manufacturing 
Company, a/k/a Waxahachie Garment Company, Edinburg, Texas (NAFTA-
00444A); and Weslaco Manufacturing Company, a/k/a Bowie 
Manufacturing Company, Weslaco, Texas (NAFTA-00444B) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 27, 
1994 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 19th day of April 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-10955 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 10.28  EARTHLINK, INC.  Board of Directors Compensation Plan  Effective January 2009  1.Retainers  a.Each independent
director receives a $35,000 annual retainer, paid semi-annually in advance
($17,500 following January Board meeting and $17,500 following July Board
meeting).  b.The Lead Director
receives an additional $20,000 annual retainer, paid semi-annually in advance
($10,000 following the January Board meeting and $10,000 following the July Board
meeting).  c.The Leadership and
Compensation Committee chair, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
chair and the Finance Committee chair each receive an additional $10,000 annual
retainer, paid semi-annually in advance ($5,000 following January Board
meeting and $5,000 following July Board meeting).  d.The Audit Committee
chair receives an additional $20,000 annual retainer, paid semi-annually in
advance ($10,000 following January Board meeting and $10,000 following July Board
meeting).  2.Meeting Fees  a.Each independent
director is paid $1,000 for each full Board meeting and Committee meeting he or
she attends in person and $500 for each full Board meeting and Committee
meeting he or she attends telephonically.  3.Restricted Stock
Units  a.Independent
directors receive an initial grant when they join the Board of Restricted Stock
Units (RSUs) valued at $45,000.  b.Additionally,
independent directors receive an annual grant of RSUs valued at $30,000 on the
first business day of January of each year.  c.Additionally,
independent directors receive an annual grant of RSUs valued at $30,000 on the
date of the July Board meeting each year.  d.RSUs will vest one
year from the date of grant, provided the director is serving as an independent
director at that time, and upon vesting may be received in shares of stock or
may be deferred into a deferred compensation plan.  i.Note:  Each RSU is equal to one share of EarthLink
stock.  Upon vesting, the RSUs may be
received in shares of stock (in which case the recipient has taxable income equal
to the value of the shares received on the date of vesting), or may be deferred
into a deferred compensation plan where they continue to be equal to shares of
EarthLink stock but where receipt and taxation may be deferred to later dates.


4.Meeting Expenses  a.EarthLink
reimburses directors for their expenses incurred in attending Board of
Directors and Committee meetings.  5.Education Expenses  a.EarthLink will pay
reasonable program fees and associated travel expenses for each director to
participate in one or more additional relevant director education
programs.  In selecting director
education programs, directors should consider general Board governance and
specific Committee focus.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9426]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Financial Assistance Award: Thomas L. Dinwoodie, PowerLight 
Company

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy announces that pursuant to 10 
CFR 600.6(a)(2) it is making a financial assistance award under Grant 
Number DE-FG01-95EE15638 to Thomas L. Dinwoodie, PowerLight Company. 
The proposed grant will provide funding in the estimated amount of 
$99,400 by the Department of Energy for the purpose of saving energy 
through additional engineering refinements, prototype demonstration, 
plus product testing and certification by independent laboratories of 
the inventor's ``Powerguard.'' This award will be made 14 calendar days 
after publication to allow for public comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Energy has determined in 
accordance with 10 CFR 600.14(e)(1) that the unsolicited application 
for financial assistance submitted by Thomas L. Dinwoodie, PowerLight 
is meritorious based on the general evaluation required by 10 CFR 
600.14(d) and the proposed project represents a unique idea that would 
not be eligible for financial assistance under a recent, current or 
planned solicitation. The basis of the Powerguard, is to integrate the 
PV modules into the building's structure, particularly the roof. 
Integrated PV/roof systems are attractive because the PV system's cost 
is reduced by the dual usage of the PV module as both a roofing 
material and as PV power modules as an internal component of a roof. 
The proposed project is not eligible for financial assistance under a 
recent, current or planned solicitation because the funding program, 
the Energy Related Invention Program (ERIP), has been structured since 
its beginning in 1975 to operate without competitive solicitations 
because the authorizing legislation directs ERIP to provide support for 
worthy ideas submitted by the public. The program has never issued and 
has no plans to issue a competitive solicitation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please write the U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Placement and Administration, ATTN: Rose Mason, HR-
531.21, 1000 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.
    The anticipated term of the proposed grant is 18 months from the 
date of award.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on April 6, 1995.
Lynn Warner,
Contracting Officer, Office of Placement and Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-9426 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 3.5







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the annual report of Kobex Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Geoffrey Bach, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Geoffrey Bach


__________________________________


Geoffrey Bach


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting and Financial Officer


March 28, 2013











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20779-20780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11476]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 89 and 90

[FRL-5502-6]


Reduced Certification Reporting Requirements for New Nonroad 
Engines

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Today's action proposes to revise certification requirements 
for new nonroad spark-ignition engines at or below 19 kilowatts (60 FR 
34582), and new nonroad compression-ignition engines at or above 37 
kilowatts (59 FR 31306), by reducing the reporting burden associated 
with the application for certification.
    In the final rule section of today's Federal Register, EPA is 
issuing these revisions as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because EPA views the action as noncontroversial and anticipates no 
adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the revisions is set forth 
in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in 
response to that direct final rule, no further activity is contemplated 
in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse public 
comment on any of the specific issues identified in the direct final 
rule, EPA will publish one action withdrawing the provisions of the 
final action corresponding to that specific issue, and all adverse 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested on commenting on this 
action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 7, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted (in duplicate, if 
possible) to: EPA Air and Radiation Docket, Attention Docket No. A-95-
57, room M-1500 (mail code 6102), 401 M St., S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20460. The docket may be inspected at this location from 8:30 a.m. 
until 5:30 p.m. weekdays. The docket may also be reached by telephone 
at (202) 260-7548. As provided in 40 CFR part 2, a reasonable fee may 
be charged by EPA for photocopying.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel Horne, (313) 741-7803.


[[Page 20780]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule published in the rules section of today's Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 89 and 90

    Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, 
Confidential business information, Environmental protection, Imports, 
Incorporation by reference, Labeling, Nonroad source pollution, 
Reporting requirements.

    Dated: May 2, 1996.
Carol M. Browner,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-11476 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10534]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5464-1]


Effluent Guidelines Task Force Open Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Effluent Guidelines Task Force, an EPA advisory committee, 
will hold a meeting to discuss the Agency's Effluent Guidelines 
Program. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 7, 1996, from 9:00 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m., and Wednesday, May 8, 1996, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the DuPont Plaza Hotel, 1500 
New Hampshire Avenue NW., Washington, D.C.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Randolph, Office of Water 
(4303), 401 M Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460; telephone (202) 260-
5373, fax (202) 260-7185.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Environmental Protection Agency gives notice 
of a meeting of the Effluent Guidelines Task Force (EGTF). The EGTF is 
a subcommittee of the National Advisory Council for Environmental 
Policy and Technology (NACEPT), the external policy advisory board to 
the Administrator of EPA.
    The EGTF was established in July of 1992 to advise EPA on the 
Effluent Guidelines Program, which develops regulation for dischargers 
of industrial wastewater pursuant to Title III of the Clean Water Act 
(33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). The Task Force consists of members appointed 
by EPA from industry, citizen groups, state and local government, the 
academic and scientific communities, and EPA regional offices. The Task 
Force was created to offer advice to the Administrator on the long-term 
strategy for the effluent guidelines program, and particularly to 
provide recommendations on a process for expediting the promulgation of 
effluent guidelines. The Task Force generally does not discuss specific 
effluent guideline regulations currently under development.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Limited seating for the 
public is available on a first-come, first-served basis. The public may 
submit written comments to the Task Force regarding improvements to the 
Effluent Guidelines program. Comments should be sent to Beverly 
Randolph at the above address. Comments submitted by May 3, 1996 will 
be considered by the Task Force at or subsequent to the meeting.

    Dated: April 19, 1996.
Eric Strassler,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 96-10534 Filed 4-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EX 10.4


    Growth
      Consultants, LLC

    33
      North Pine Circle

    Belleair,
      Florida 33756

     

    July
      7,
      2006

     

    Ms.
      Tracy
      Culver Caswell, General Counsel

    Smart
      Video Technologies, Inc.

    3505
      Koger Boulevard, Suite 400

    Duluth,
      Georgia 30096

     

    
      	
            	Re:	
              Extension
                of January 27, 2006 Consulting Agreement Dear
                Tracy:

            


    

     

    This
      letter is to confirm that SmartVideoTM Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") and I
      have agreed to extend the term of my January 27, 2006 Consulting
      Agreement through and including September 30, 2006. Furthermore,
      this letter will confirm that I have agreed to forego the previously
      agreed upon option grant to me in the third quarter of 2006. All other
      terms and conditions of the January 27, 2006 Consulting Agreement shall
      remain in full force and effect until September 30th,
      2006,
      at which time
      the
      Agreement will expire or be renewed for an additional quarter.

     

    Please
      call me with any questions. 

     

    Sincerely,

     

     

     

    N.
      John
      Simmons, Jr., President

    Growth
      Consultants, LLC

     

    
      	Cc:	
              Glenn
                Singer

            


    

     David
      Ross

    William
      Loughman
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Howton, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of defendant’s claims on appeal from convictions of third degree possession and sale of a controlled substance requires reversal. The trial court properly allowed the undercover police officer who purchased cocaine from defendant to testify that defendant told him that he could return to buy more because the evidence was part of the criminal res gestae and was probative of defendant’s motive and intent *(see, People v Molineux,*168 NY 264; *People v Polk,*84 AD2d 943, 945). At trial the People established a proper chain of custody *(see, People v Julian,*41 NY2d 340; *People v Wilson,*150 AD2d 628; *People v Hart,*113 AD2d 966) and provided reasonable assurance of the identity and unchanged condition of the narcotics *(see, People v McGee,*49 NY2d 48, 60). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to disclose the identity and background of the infor*965mant because defendant did not establish the need for such information *(see, People v Pena,*37 NY2d 642, 649; *People v Amarante,*120 AD2d 538). Defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct in voir dire and summation lack merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.— criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40066

Summary Calendar

__________________

ARCHIE P. TOBIAS, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J. COWART; T.L. DOERR; T.J. MCKINNEY; 

JAMES A. SHAW, JR., Warden; NGUYEN,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-91-CV-392

- - - - - - - - - -

June 27, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Archie P. Tobias, Jr., #583391, a Texas state prisoner, moves for leave to appeal in forma

pauperis (IFP) from the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in his civil

rights suit. Tobias contends that he raised genuine issues relevant to his various medical, work,

and disciplinary claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Tobias v.
No. 96-40066

-2-

Cowart, No. G-91-392 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 1996). His appeal fails to present a nonfrivolous issue;

the motion for IFP is DENIED. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't, 

811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). The appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.