alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5642 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5642

To permit the Chief Administrative Officer to pay salaries in or under 
the House of Representatives twice per month in certain cases, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

Mr. Kilmer (for himself and Mr. Timmons) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit the Chief Administrative Officer to pay salaries in or under 
the House of Representatives twice per month in certain cases, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Staff Salary Schedule Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATING THE PROCESS FOR PAYING SALARIES OF THE HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES.

    Section 116(a) of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2002 
(2 U.S.C. 4551) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The usual day'' and inserting ``(1) 
        Except as provided in paragraph (2), the usual day''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) When the House of Representatives next upgrades its payroll 
system, if directed by the Committee on House Administration of the 
House of Representatives, the Chief Administrative Officer may pay 
salaries in or under the House of Representatives twice per month, or 
on the basis of such other schedule, as such Committee may promulgate 
by regulation.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10440]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-156; RM-8701]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Shelton, WA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Sound Broadcasting, Inc., 
allots Channel 233A at Shelton, Washington, as the community's first 
local FM transmission service. See 60 FR 53892, October 18, 1995. 
Channel 233A can be allotted to Shelton in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 6.6 kilometers (4.1 miles) northwest to avoid short-
spacings to the licensed sites of Station KMPS-FM, Channel 231C, 
Seattle, Washington, and Station KUKN(FM), Channel 233A, Kelso, 
Washington. The coordinates for Channel 233A at Shelton are North 
Latitude 47-14-43 and West Longitude 123-10-25. See Supplementary 
Information, infra.

DATES: Effective June 7, 1996. The window period for filing 
applications will open on June 7, 1996 and close on July 8, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 95-156, adopted April 5, 1996, and 
released April 23, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.
    Recognizing that the allotment of Channel 233A would be short-
spaced to the proposed allotment of Channel 233C at Vancouver, British 
Columbia, we have determined that no potential interference would 
result from this allotment. Therefore, since the Shelton is located 
within 320 kilometers (200 miles) of the U.S.-Canadian border, 
concurrence of the Canadian government for the allotment of Channel 
233A has been obtained as a specially-negotiated allotment. With this 
action, this proceeding is terminated.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sections 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 
154, as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Washington, 
is amended by adding Shelton, Channel 233A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-10440 Filed 4-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

June 2, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20185 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MILTON EARL CARBE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-337-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Milton Earl Carbe has appealed his convictions for conspiracy

to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession with

intent to distribute cocaine. He contends that the district court

should have suppressed evidence obtained pursuant to a search

warrant because the warrant was supporte d by a facially invalid1 United States v. Cavazos
, 288 F.3d 706, 709 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 253 (2002).

2 United States v. Cisneros

, 112 F.3d 1272, 1278 (5th Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted).

3 Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).

4 Id.

5 S ee United States v. Laury , 985 F.2d 1293, 1312 (5th Cir. 1993).

-2- affidavit. We review this question de novo

. 1

Under the good-faith ex c eption to the exclusionary rule,

“[e]vidence obtained by o fficers in objectively reasonable goodfaith reliance upon a search warrant is admissible, even though the

affidavit on which the warrant was based was insu fficient to

estab lish probable cause.” 2 Officers may rely in good faith upon

the validity of a warrant “so long as the warrant is supported by

more than a ‘bare bone s affidavit.’” 3 An affidavit is bare bones

if “it so deficient in demonstrating probable cause that it renders

an officer’s belief in its existence completely unreasonable.” 4

The affidavit in this case was based on the hearsay statements

of a confidential informant. “An affidavit may rely on hearsay –

information not within the personal knowledge of the affiant, such

as an informant’s statement – as long as the affidavit presents a

substantial basis for crediting the hearsay.” 5 In considering

whether an informant’s tip is credible, we examine the informant’s6 Id.

7 Id.

8 Id.

9 Cisneros , 112 F.3d at 1278.

-3- veracity and basis of knowledge. 6 The officer’s statements in an

affidavit that the informant previously provided reliable

information sufficiently establi shed the informant’s veracity. 7

Similarly, th e factual detail in the affidavit sufficiently

demonstrated the informant’s basis of k nowledge. 8 The affidavit

was thus not “so deficient in demonstrating probable cause” that it

rendered the officers’ belief in the existence of probable cause

“completely unreasonable.” 9

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**
 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****       In connection with the Annual Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom Anderson, the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and 

       2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and result of operations of the Companyfor the period certified. 

        This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts. 

Date: March 14, 2008

/s/ TOM ANDERSON 	Tom Anderson	Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 99(a)(1)




                         Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc.:


We have examined the accompanying management's assertion that CitiFinancial
Mortgage Company, Inc. (the Company) complied with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The portfolios covered by this assertion include
CitiFinancial Mortgage Securities Inc. REMIC Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2002-1, 2003-1, 2003-2, 2003-3, 2003-4, and 2004-1. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that CitiFinancial Mortgage Company, Inc.
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


                               /s/ KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 2, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 1999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1065]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Currently, the IRS is soliciting 
comments concerning an existing regulation, LR-1214, Discharge of 
Liens.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 25, 1996 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Garrick R. Shear, Internal 
Revenue Service, room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the information collection should be directed to Martha R. 
Brinson, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue Service, room 5571, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Discharge of Liens.
    OMB Number: 1545-0854.
    Regulation Project Number: LR-1214 Final.
    Abstract: The Internal Revenue Service needs this information in 
processing a request to sell property subject to a tax lien to 
determine if the taxpayer has equity in the property. This information 
will be used to determine the amount, if any, to which the tax lien 
attaches.
    Current Actions: There is no change to the collection of 
information in this existing regulation.
    Type of Review: Extension of OMB approval.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
organizations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 500.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 24 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 200.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Written comments should address the 
accuracy of the burden estimates and ways to minimize burden including 
the use of automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of 
information technology, as well as other relevant aspects of the 
information collection request.

    Approved: January 17, 1996.
Garrick R. Shear,
IRS Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-1065 Filed 1-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CANAM URANIUM
      CORP.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Canam
      Uranium Corp., for the quarter ended April 30, 2007, the undersigned, Ryan
      Gibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Canam Uranium Corp., does
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended July 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Canam Uranium Corp.





Date:
      September 14, 2007




/s/
              Ryan GibsonRyan
                GibsonPresident
              and Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DELTA DANIELLE HARRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2023-1503

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 2:20-cv-14195-RLR, 

Judge Robin L. Rosenberg.

______________________

Before DYK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

We dismiss Delta Danielle Harris’s recently-docketed 

appeal. Ms. Harris seeks review of “the final judgment 

which was entered into the District Court on the 19th day 

of December 2022.” ECF No. 1-2 at 1. But the only entry 

on the district court’s docket from that date is the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding its decision affirming the district 

court’s dismissal of Ms. Harris’s complaint and denial of 

Case: 23-1503 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 03/08/2023
2 HARRIS v. INTERIOR

transfer to this court. This court does not possess jurisdiction to review the decisions of other courts of appeals, 

see 28 U.S.C. § 1295, and therefore this matter must be 

dismissed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

 March 8, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 23-1503 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 03/08/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mitchell York, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered February 6, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, under indictment No. 3038/85, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, (2) a judgment of the same court rendered June 3, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (five counts), robbery in the second degree (five counts), burglary in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the second degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and *749unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, under indictment No. 2982/85, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, (3) a judgment of the same court, also rendered June 3, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, under indictment No. 3065/85, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, (4) a judgment of the same court, also rendered June 3, 1986, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, under indictment No. 3636/85, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (5) a judgment of the same court, also rendered June 3, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree under indictment No. 3571/85, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the introduction at the trial of indictment No. 3038/85 of evidence which allegedly referred to uncharged crimes. Therefore, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Salcedo,*150 AD2d 624; CPL 470.05 [2]).

We reject the defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court improperly considered information contained in the probation report regarding unrelated crimes of a similar nature committed by the defendant. The court, in imposing sentence under indictment No. 3038/85, properly considered those pending indictments *(see, People v Cunningham,*153 AD2d 700; *People v Shapiro,*141 AD2d 577, 579). As the sentences imposed were within the bounds of the applicable sentencing statute and not excessive under the circumstances of the case, we decline to disturb them *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are without merit *(cf., People v Clark,*45 NY2d 432; *People v Taylor,*160 AD2d 966). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Infrastructure Investment Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
November 15, 2010




/s/  Zhang
      ChunxianName:
      Zhang ChunxianTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and
              Accounting
      Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Dental Patient Care America, Inc.
(the "Corporation") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bahman Atefi, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Corporation.

Date: April 12, 2005                             By: /s/ MICHAEL SILVA
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Michael Silva
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer