Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Notices 30589 

1See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from 

Brazil: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 7066 

(January 26, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2 Id. 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Emulsion StyreneButadiene Rubber (E–SBR) from Brazil, 

Administrative Review 2018–2019: Case Brief and 

Request to Participate in Hearing,’’ dated February 

25, 2021; see also ARLANXEO Brasil’s Letter, 

‘‘Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Brazil: 

ARLANXEO’s Case Brief,’’ dated February 25, 2021. 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Emulsion StyreneButadiene Rubber (E–SBR) from Brazil, 

Administrative Review 2018–2019: Rebuttal Brief,’’ 

dated March 4, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018– 

2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Order on Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from 

Brazil,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Emulsion StyreneButadiene Rubber from Brazil: Final Results 

Analysis Memorandum for ARLANXEO Brasil 

S.A,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (citing 

Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber from 

Brazil: Preliminary Results Analysis Memorandum 

for ARLANXEO Brasil S.A,’’ dated January 15, 

2021). 

comment (86 FR 20658–20659, April 21, 

2021). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed 

the application and determined that it 

meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant 

to the authority delegated to the FTZ 

Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 

400.36(f)), the application to expand 

Subzone 18F was approved on June 3, 

2021, subject to the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations, including Section 

400.13, and further subject to FTZ 18’s 

2,000-acre activation limit. 

Dated: June 3, 2021. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–12034 Filed 6–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–849] 

Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber 

From Brazil: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that the sole producer 

and/or exporter subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

certain emulsion styrene-butadiene 

rubber (ESB rubber) from Brazil at less 

than normal value during the period of 

review (POR), September 1, 2018, 

through August 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable June 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Drew Jackson, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4406. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 26, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results.2 This review 

covers one mandatory respondent, 

ARLANXEO Brasil S.A. (ARLANXEO 

Brasil). On February 25, 2021, Lion 

Elastomers, LLC (the petitioner), and 

ARLANXEO Brasil filed case briefs,3

and on March 4, 2021, the petitioner 

filed a rebuttal brief.4 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is certain ESB rubber from Brazil. The 

merchandise subject to this order is 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

4002.19.0015 and 4002.19.0019 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). ESB rubber is 

described by Chemical Abstract Services 

(CAS) Registry No. 9003–55–8. This 

CAS number also refers to other types 

of styrene butadiene rubber. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings and CAS 

registry number are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive. For a full 

description of the scope of the order, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by parties in the case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues addressed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

We have made no changes to the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

ARLANXEO Brasil. For detailed 

information, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, Commerce 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists for the 

period September 1, 2018, through 

August 31, 2019: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

ARLANXEO Brasil S.A ............... 34.93 

Disclosure of Calculations 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with the final 

results of an administrative review 

within five days of any public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of the notice of final 

results in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

However, as noted above, Commerce 

has made no changes to its margin 

calculations since the Preliminary 

Results. Commerce disclosed its 

preliminary margin calculations to 

interested parties, and there are no 

additional calculations to disclose.6

Assessment Rates 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries in accordance with 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.212(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where the respondent reported the 

entered value of their U.S. sales, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales for which 

entered value was reported. Where the 

respondent did not report entered value, 

we calculated the entered value in order 

to calculate the assessment rate. Where 

an importer-specific assessment rate is 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 

the entries by that importer will be 

liquidated without reference to 

antidumping duties. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
30590 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Notices 

7See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

8See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

9See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

10See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from 

Brazil: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative 

Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR 

33048 (July 19, 2019). 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 39531 

(July 1, 2020). 

2See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 31, 2020; see 

also Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review Request,’’ 

dated July 31, 2020, collectively from: Liang 

Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Romp Coil Nail 

Industries Inc., UJL Industries Co., Ltd., Hor Liang 

Industrial Corp., Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd., Trim 

International Inc., China Staple Enterprise 

Corporation, Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd., and Zon Mon Co., 

Ltd. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 (September 3, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.7

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by 

ARLANXEO Brasil for which it did not 

know the merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 

all-others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.8

Consistent with its recent notice,9

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for ARLANXEO Brasil 

S.A. will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 19.61 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.10

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notice to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: June 3, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues 

and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Cost Methodology 

Comment 2: Level of Trade, Constructed 

Export Price Offset 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–12078 Filed 6–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–854] 

Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments in the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Create Trading Co., Ltd. (Create 

Trading), the sole company under 

review, made no shipments of certain 

steel nails from Taiwan during the 

period of review (POR), July 1, 2019, to 

June 30, 2020. We invite interested 

parties to comment on this preliminary 

determination of no shipments. 

DATES: Applicable June 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne Lam, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2020, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain steel nails from Taiwan.1

Based on timely requests for 

administrative review,2 on September 3, 

2020, Commerce published the notice of 

initiation for an administrative review, 

covering 141 companies, in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i).3

On September 21, 2020, the petitioner 

timely withdrew its request for 

administrative review of all companies 

it originally requested, except for one 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1