alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w26



 





Exhibit 10.26




Board Compensation Summary Sheet




     Effective October 1, 2006 each director of the Company who is not a compensated officer or
employee of the Company will receive cash compensation as follows:




	 	•	 	Board member annual retainer of $50,000
	 
	 	•	 	Presiding Director — annual retainer of $5,000
	 
	 	•	 	Board meeting fee for each meeting attended-$1,500
	 
	 	•	 	Audit Committee Chairman — annual retainer of $15,000
	 
	 	•	 	Member of the Audit Committee — $2,000 for each meeting attended
	 
	 	•	 	Human Resources Committee Chairman — annual retainer of $7,500
	 
	 	•	 	Chairman of other Board Committees — annual retainer of $5,000
	 
	 	•	 	Member of other Board Committees — $1,500 for each meeting attended




The Board has also established a cash equivalent value for annual equity compensation for directors
of $100,000 and will use a twelve month average share price as the basis for the awards.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19619-19620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10850]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Licensee Order to Show Cause

    The Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, 
has before him the following matter:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   MM   
              Licensee                       City/State          docket 
                                                                   No.  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Great American Broadcasting of       Hutchinson, Kansas.......     96-99
 Hutchinson, Inc. Licensee of                                           
 KWHK(AM).                                                              
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Regarding the silent status of Station KWHK(AM))

    Pursuant to Section 312(a) (3) and (4) of the Communications Act of 
1934, as amended, Great American Broadcasting of Hutchinson, Inc. has 
been directed to show cause why the license for Station KWHK(AM) should 
not be revoked, at a proceeding in which the above matter has been 
designated for hearing concerning the following issues:
    1. To determine whether Great American Broadcasting of Hutchinson, 
Inc. has the capability and intent to

[[Page 19620]]

expeditiously resume broadcast operations of KWHK(AM) consistent with 
the Commission's Rules.
    2. To determine whether Great American Broadcasting of Hutchinson, 
Inc. has violated Sections 73.1740 and/or 73.1750 of the Commissions 
Rules.
    3. To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the 
foregoing issues, whether Great American Broadcasting of Hutchinson, 
Inc. is qualified to be and remain the licensee of Station KWHK(AM).

    A copy of the complete Show Cause Order and Hearing Designation 
Order in this proceeding is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the dockets section of the FCC Reference 
Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. The complete 
text may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating 
contractor, International Transcription Service, 2100 M Street, N.W., 
Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037 (telephone 202-857-3800).

Federal Communications Commission.
Stuart B. Bedell,
Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-10850 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### SOUTHLAND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The ESTATE OF Martha SMALL, et al., Respondents.

No. D-0569.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 27, 1991.

*801Paul D. Clote, Houston, David E. Cowen, Galveston, for petitioner.

Jimmy Williamson, Houston, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

At the time of her non-work-related injury, Martha Small was employed by Man-del-Kahn Company and covered under a group health insurance policy issued by Southland Life Insurance Company. When she was dismissed by her employer six months after the accident, the insurer ceased payment of all medical expenses thereafter incurred.

Small then filed suit against Southland Life, Mandel-Kahn, and others alleging breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligence, gross negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of the Texas Insurance Code, Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), and Employees’ Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The trial court granted Southland Life’s motion for summary judgment based upon several non-ERISA related defenses. On appeal, for the first time, Southland Life additionally urged that all of Small’s claims were preempted by ERISA. Rejecting this assertion as having been waived by its non-presentation to the trial court, the court of appeals reversed and remanded. 797 S.W.2d 74.

The claims remanded to the trial court are among those defined as relating to an employee benefit plan and thus are preempted by ERISA. *Gorman v. Life Ins. Co. of North America,*1991 WL 7964 (Tex.1991); *Cathey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*805 S.W.2d 387 (Tex.1991). Under *Gorman*and *Cathey,*the court of appeals erred in holding that the preemption claim had been waived, since this defense is jurisdictional and can be raised initially on appeal. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 170, we grant Southland Life’s application for writ of error and, without hearing oral argument, a majority of the Court reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and renders judgment in favor of Southland Life.
|                      |             
|--------------------- | ------------
|MICON                 | Exhibit 4.18
|International Limited |             







Certificate of Qualification

Pierre Jean Lafleur, P. Eng.



I, Pierre Jean Lafleur, certify that:



1.

At the time of this report I am a resident at 933 Carre Valois, Ste-Therese, Quebec, Canada, J7E 4L8.



2.

I am a registered Professional Geoscientist with the Association of Professional Geoscientists in the Province of Quebec (membership OIQ #39862).



3.

I hold the following academic qualifications:



I am a member of the Canadian Institute of Mines and Metallurgy.

I am a graduate from Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal (B. ENG.).



4.

I have practiced my profession in exploration, geology and mining for more than 25 years, with extensive experience in gold, base metals and industrial minerals as well.



5.

I have visited the Crucitas Project site on a trip to Costa Rica from October 11th to 21st 2005 and took my own samples from the old drill core in storage on site.



6.

I wrote the original report for the Crucitas Project, entitled Technical report for the Crucitas Project of Vannessa Ventures Ltd. Calgary dated February, 2006 for Geostat.



7.

The reader should be aware that PJ Lafleur, prior to working with Geostat and writing the February 2006 report, had been called by Lyon Lake in February 1999 to review the CPC and IMC findings as an Independent Consultant.



8.

This certificate applies to the technical report entitled Las Crucitas Gold Project NI 43101 Summary of the Bankable Feasibility Study and Addendum dated February 2007.



9.

I am a Qualified Person according to the National Policy 43-101.  I have read the norm and I understand the terms and implications.



10.

I have not received, nor do I expect to receive directly or indirectly and interest in any form for the Crucitas project from Vannessa Ventures Ltd.



11.

I am responsible for section 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and portions of section 17 related to the resource estimate.



12.

That, as of this date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the technical report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make this technical report not misleading.



13.

I consent to the filing of the report with any Canadian stock exchange or securities regulatory authority, and any publication by them of the report.



Dated February 21, 2007



Pierre J. Lafleur



Pierre Jean Lafleur, P.Eng.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of WRC Media Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned in his capacity as an
officer of WRC Media Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) Based on the officer's knowledge, the Report fully complies with
             the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
             Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) Based on the officer's knowledge, the information contained in the
             Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
             condition, and results of operations of WRC Media Inc.


/s/ Martin E. Kenney, Jr.


---------------------------------------
Martin E. Kenney, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Richard Nota


---------------------------------------
Richard Nota
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19306-19307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10836]




-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Toxicology Program; Availability of Technical Report on 
Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride

    The HHS' National Toxicology Program announces the availability of 
the NTP Technical Report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies 
of methylphenidate hydrochloride. Methylphenidate hydrochloride is a 
drug used in the treatment of narcolepsy and attention deficit 
hyperactivity disorders.

    Toxicology and carcinogenicity studies were conducted by 
administration of methylphenidate hydrochloride in feed to groups of 70 
F344/N rats of each sex at doses of 0, 100, 500, or 1,000 ppm and to 
groups of 70 B6C3F<INF>1 mice of each sex at doses of 0, 50, 250, or 
500 ppm.

    Under the conditions of these 2-year feed studies, there was no 
evidence of carcinogenic activity <SUP>1 of

[[Page 19307]]

methylphenidate hydrochloride in male or female F344/N rats receiving 
100, 500, or 1,000 ppm. There was some evidence of carcinogenic 
activity in male and female B6C3F<INF>1 mice, based on the occurrence 
of hepatochellular neoplasms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The NTP uses five categories of evidence of carcinogenic 
activity observed in each animal study: two categories for positive 
results (``clear evidence'' and ``some evidence''), one category for 
uncertain findings (``equivocal evidence''), one category for no 
observable effect (``no evidence''), and one category for studies 
that cannot be evaluated because of major flaws (``inadequate 
study'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Treatment of female rats with methylphenidate hydrochloride was 
associated with a decrease in the incidence of mammary gland 
fibroadenomas. Administration of methylphenidate hydrochloride to male 
and female mice resulted in increased incidence of eosinophilic foci in 
the liver.
    Questions or comments about the Technical Report should be directed 
to Central Data Management at P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, 
NC 27709 or telephone (919) 541-3419.
    Copies of Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Methylphenidate 
Hydrochloride (CAS No. 298-59-9) (TR-439) are available without charge 
from Central Data Management, NIEHS, MD E1-02, P.O. Box 12233, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709; telephone (919) 541-3419.

    Dated: March 27, 1996.
Kenneth Olden,
Director, National Toxicology Program.
[FR Doc. 96-10836 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (this “Second Amendment”) dated as of
August 31, 2006 (the “Effective Date”) to the Employment Agreement dated as of March 29, 2006, as amended by the First Amendment dated as of May 20, 2006 (collectively, the “Agreement”), by and between SAVVIS,
Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at St. Louis, Missouri (the “Company”), and Jonathan C. Crane, of Hanover, New Hampshire (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive jointly desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement in the manner provided for in this Second Amendment;

 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the
premises contained herein, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	5.	Amendment of Section 7 (Change of Control) of the Agreement. Section 7(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “not earlier than nine months
following the Change of Control” and substituting in lieu thereof “not earlier than six months following the Change of Control.” 

  

	 	6.	No Other Amendments. Except as expressly amended, modified and supplemented by this Second Amendment, the provisions of the Agreement are and shall remain in full force and
effect. 

  

	 	7.	Governing Law. This is a Missouri contract and shall be construed and enforced under and be governed in all respects by the laws of Missouri, without regard to the conflict
of laws principles thereof. 

  

	 	8.	Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become effective when one or more
counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second
Amendment has been executed as a sealed instrument by the Company, by its duly authorized representative, and by the Executive, as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	THE EXECUTIVE:	 	THE COMPANY
			
	 /s/ Jonathan C. Crane
	 	By:	 	 /s/ Philip J. Koen

		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11421]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to Office of 
Management and Budget for Review

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has submitted 
information collection 3038-0007, Regulation of Domestic Exchange-
Traded Options to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-511. The information collection 
pursuant to this rule is in the public interest and is necessary for 
market surveillance.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection 
should contact Jeff Hill, Office of Management and Budget, Room 3228, 
NEOB, Washington, D.C. 20502, (202) 395-7340. Copies of the submission 
are available from Joe F. Mink, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 418-
5170.
    Title: Regulation of Domestic Exchange-Traded Options.
    Control Number: 3038-0007.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Business (excluding small business).
    Estimated Annual Burden: 41,387 total hours.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            Estimated                 Est. avg. 
             Respondents                       Regulation (17 CFR)          number of      Annual     hours per 
                                                                           respondents   responses     response 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses...........................  Parts 33 and 16...................      190,420      230,782        50.57
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on May 1, 1996.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-11421 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CANAM URANIUM
      CORP.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Canam
      Uranium Corp. for the quarter ended April 30, 2007, the undersigned, David
      Hayes, Chief Financial Officer of Canam Uranium Corp., does hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended April 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Canam Uranium Corp.


Date: July
              23, 2007
            
            /s/ David
              HayesDavid
                HayesChief
                Financial
                Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5700 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5700

 To direct the Secretary of State to develop and submit to Congress a 
      strategy to improve the processing of passport applications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2023

 Ms. Caraveo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of State to develop and submit to Congress a 
      strategy to improve the processing of passport applications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Assistance for Streamlining 
Travel Passports Act'' or the ``FAST Passports Act''.

SEC. 2. STRATEGY TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION RELATING TO THE PROCESSING OF 
              PASSPORT APPLICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall develop and submit 
to the relevant congressional committees a strategy to improve the 
processing of passport applications.
    (b) Matters To Be Included.--The strategy required by subsection 
(a) shall, within 360 days after the date of submission of the 
strategy, seek to achieve the following:
            (1) Improve communication within the Department of State, 
        including among all passport agencies and centers, relating to 
        the processing of passport applications.
            (2) Ensure that United states citizens and congressional 
        offices inquiring on behalf of such citizens are able to 
        contact the Department of State, including a passport agency or 
        center, regarding the status of requests for passport 
        applications and receive updates within a reasonably short 
        period of time.
    (c) Relevant Congressional Committees Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``relevant congressional committees'' means the Committee on 
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
No. _____________

In the

Court of Criminal Appeals

At Austin



No. 01-14-00165-CR

In the

Court of Appeals

for the

First District of Texas

at Houston



No. 1344756

In the 338 th District Court

Harris County, Texas





### LOUIS MARKEITH WILLAIMS

Appellant

V.



### THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee



APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

APPELLANT, pursuant

to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.2(c) moves for an

extension of time within which to file its petition for discretionary review. In

support of its motion, appellant submits the following:

1. Appellant

was charged with the felony offense of theft. PD-0413-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/13/2015 8:47:05 PM

Accepted 4/15/2015 5:13:26 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK2. A jury convicted appellant of the charged offense and sentenced

him to 32 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice on February 5, 2014.

3. A unanimous panel of the First Court of Appeals rendered

judgment in an unpublished opinion on March 12, 2015, affirming

appellant’s conviction and sentence.

5. Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is due April 13, 2015.

6. Appellant seeks an extension, in accordance with TEX. R. APP.

P. 68.2(c), until May 13, 2015, to file its petition for discretionary

review. This is appellant’s first request for an extension.

9. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the

requested extension:

a. Counsel has been working on the appellate briefs in Dorsey v.

State, No. 01-14-00685-CR., Hayes v. State

, 04-14-00878-CR.

and 04-14-00879-CR., and Ross v. State

, 01-14-00902-CR.

b. Counsel has filed a writ of certiorari in the United States

Supreme Court in Masterson v. Stephens.

c. A p p e l l a n t ’ s p e t i t i o n i s n o t f

o r p u r p o s e s o f d e l a

y

, b u t s o t h a t

j u s t i c e m a y b e d o n e

.

WHEREFORE, the Appellant prays that this Court will grant the

requested extension until May 13, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/M ANDY M ILLER

Attorney for appellant

2910 Commercial Center Blvd., Ste. 103-201

Katy, TX 77494

SBN 24055561

PHONE (832) 900-9884

FAX (877) 904-6846

mandy@mandymillerlegal.comCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.5, this certifies that on April 13, 2015

, a

copy of the foregoing was delivered to the following addresses:

Alan Curry

Harris County District Attorney’s Office

Curry_Alan@dao.hctx.net

Lisa McMinn

State Prosecuting Attorney

lisa.mcminn@spa.state.tx.us

/ S /M ANDY M ILLER