alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Second Amendment to Revolving Line of Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT
AGREEMENT is made and effective as of November 1, 2006 (the “Effective Date”) by and between C-COR INCORPORATED (C-Cor”), BROADBAND CAPITAL CORPORATION (“Broadband” and, together with C-Cor, collectively
the “Borrower”), and CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA (the “Bank”). 
 WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Bank have
entered into a certain Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004 (as amended by a certain Amendment to Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005 and as otherwise amended, modified or supplemented
from time to time, hereinafter referred to as the “Loan Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Bank desire to further
amend the Loan Agreement in certain respects as hereinafter provided 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and intending to be legally bound, the Bank and the Borrower hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The
Loan Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the definition of “Commitment Period” therefrom in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 
 “Commitment Period: From the date hereof to but 
 not including November 3, 2007” 

2. Capitalized terms used herein which are not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Loan Agreement. Except as amended
hereby, all of the provisions of the Loan Agreement shall remain unchanged; shall continue in full force and effect; and are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. From and after the Effective Date all references in the Loan Agreement to
“this Agreement” (and all indirect references such as “herein”, “hereby”, “hereunder”, and “hereof”) shall be deemed to refer to the Loan Agreement, as amended by this Amendment. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, have executed this Second
Amendment to Revolving Line of Credit Agreement as of the day and date first above written. 
  

									
	CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA	 		 	C-COR INCORPORATED
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Joseph F. King
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Joseph E. Zavacky

	Name:	 	Joseph F. King	 		 	Name:	 	Joseph E. Zavacky
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President	 		 	Title:	 	Controller and Assistant Secretary
				
	BROADBAND CAPITAL CORPORATION	 		 		 	
					
	By:	 	 /s/ George M. Savereno
	 		 		 	
	Name:	 	George M. Savereno	 		 		 	
	Title:	 	President
**Exhibit 13.2**

**ASAT Holdings Limited**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Kei Hong Chua, the Chief Financial Officer of ASAT Holdings Limited (the “Company”), does hereby certify as follows: 

To the best of my knowledge, the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007 accompanying thisCertification in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Dated: May 6, 2008 

 

*The Certification set forth above is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and should not be deemed to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Company or the certifying officers.*
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert D. VANTELLMAN, Appellant.

No. WD 47279.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 5, 1993.

John L. Young, Princeton, for appellant.

J. Jay Hemenway, Princeton, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from a conviction of driving a motor vehicle with a revoked driver’s license, in violation of § 302.321, RSMo Supp.1990.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
#### Bernard Goz, Appellant, v Patricia Goz, Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about March 11, 1988, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s motion for temporary maintenance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*150The proper remedy for a pendente lite award claimed to be unfair is an expeditious trial. *(Ritter v Ritter,*135 AD2d 421, 424.) These parties have already had a trial and any alleged improprieties in the temporary award can be rectified in the permanent award.

Moreover, plaintiff husband has not demonstrated that this award should be modified. The court below obviously used as a guideline in determining the amount of temporary maintenance the stipulation of settlement which had been agreed to by the parties and which was appealed only by the wife. Husband contends herein that the court did not incorporate wife’s part of the stipulation settlement, i.e., surrender of her share of the New Jersey rental property, into the order for temporary maintenance. However, the court apparently took this into account when it modified the order to reduce the amount owed by husband by the amount collected by wife as rent on the New Jersey property.

Husband’s contentions that he was unable to afford this maintenance payment and that he could have repaired the New Jersey home to substantially increase its rental value are not supported by the record. Concur—Ross, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
**Exhibit 9.3**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.333-85168, 333-09292, 333-74321, 333-124983 and 333-124997) and on Form F-3 and Form F-3/A (File No. 333-86288) of Acergy S.A. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 10, 2005, with respect to the financial statements of NKT Flexibles I/Sas of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, prepared in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act. Such statements, as included in NKT Flexibles I/S’ Annual Report for 2004 and with the addition of note 14 “Reconciliation toUnited States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP)”, are included on pages 8-24 of exhibit 15.2 of Amendment No. 3 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Acergy S.A. for the year ended November 30, 2004. 

Copenhagen, June 30, 2006 

**KPMGC.Jespersen**

Statsautoriseret Revisionsinteressentskab 

/s/ Lars Andersen 

Lars Andersen 

State Authorised Public Accountant
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Moses, Chief Financial Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAN MOSES                                   
|Dan Moses Chief Financial Officer March 29, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10516]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc. Special Committee 186; Automatic Dependent 
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 
92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special 
Committee 186 meeting to be held May 15-16, 1996, beginning at 9:00 
a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks/Review 
of Meeting Agenda; (2) Review and Approval of Minutes of the Previous 
Meeting; (3) Report of Working Group Activities: a. Working Group 1 
Report (Operations Working Group); b. Working Group 2 Report (Technical 
Working Group); c. Working Group 3 Report (CDTI Working Group); (4) 
Review of Latest Version of the MASPS; (5) Other Business; (6) Date and 
Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 24, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-10516 Filed 4-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Peter
V. White, Chief Financial Officer of Nascent Wine Company, Inc., certify
that:
 
 1. I
have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Nascent Wine Company , Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, The small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.
 
 5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;
 
 (b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Date:
      May 22, 2008
              /s/ Peter
      v.
      WhitePeter
      V. WhiteChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer
**EXHIBIT32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Robert D. Ollwerther, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the managerof ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2007
| By                                    | /s/ ROBERT D. OLLWERTHER |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| Robert D. Ollwerther                  |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

----
EX-21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


1.   e-Auction Global Trading Inc. (Barbados), a Barbados corporation,
     wholly-owned by the Company

2.   Aucxis Corp. (Canada), a Canadian corporation, wholly-owned by e-Auction
     Global Trading Inc. (Barbados)

3.   Aucxis Corp., a Belgium Company, wholly-owned by the Company

4.   Schelfhout Computer Systemen N.V., a Belgium corporation, wholly-owned by
     Aucxis Corp. (Belgium)

5.   SDL Invest N.V., a Belgian corporation incorporated March 22, 2000, in
     which the Company has a 40% ownership interest.

6.   v-Wholesaler N.V. (a holding company), wholly-owned by the Company.

7.   i-Three Inc., wholly-owned by the Company

8.   Aucxis Ltd., a company publicly traded on the Australian Stock Exchange, in
     which the Company has a 48.2% ownership interest
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ZHAIRE N. DEKEYSER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 227 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT
        23.1
  
 CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 To: FreeStar
        Technology Corporation
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference on Registration Statements on Form
        S-8
        (No. 333-73032 )
        of FreeStar
        Technology Corporation of our
        report, which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial
        doubt
        about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated September
        1,
        2006, included in FreeStar
        Technology Corporation 's
        Annual
        Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006.
 
 
 /s/
        RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
 Russell
        Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP
 
 
 New
        York,
        New York
 September
        29, 2006
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Peer Review Mediation and
Arbitration, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



                                 /s/Willis Hale
                                 ----------------------
                                 Willis Hale
                                 Chief Executive Officer


                                 /s/Marc E. Combs
                                 ----------------------
                                 Marc E. Combs
                                 Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  November 22, 2010
#### In the Interest of W.R.A. and B.B. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.B. (Natural Father), Appellant.

No. WD 47836.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 2, 1994.

Gerald F. McGonagle, Kansas City, for appellant.

Daniel G. Barry, Kansas City, for respondent.

Sandra J. Wirtel, Kansas City, for guardian ad litem.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from an order terminating parental rights pursuant to § 211.447, RSMo 1986.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Debbra Lynn SLOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 233-92.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Dec. 23, 1992.

Petition for discretionary review from Court of Appeals, 9th Supreme Judicial District.

Charles T. Moreland, Willis, for appellant.

Peter C. Speers, III, Dist. Atty., Kathleen A. Hamilton, Asst. Dist. Atty., Conroe, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and her punishment was assessed by a jury at twenty years confinement. This conviction was affirmed. *Slott v. State,*824 S.W.2d 225 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1992). Appellant seeks discretionary review of the Court of Appeals’ holding that evidence of unadjudicated extraneous offenses was admissible in the punishment phase of trial.

During the punishment phase, the trial court permitted Appellant’s husband to testify that Appellant had assaulted him on two different occasions. Neither of these assaults resulted in a final conviction. The Court of Appeals held that this evidence was admissible under the 1989 amendment to Art. 37.07, § 3(a), V.A.C.C.P.

The Court of Appeals’ opinion was handed down before our decision in *Grunsfeld v. State,*843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). We therefore grant Appellant’s petition, reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand the cause to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in *Grunsfeld.*
N

o t i c e : T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o f o r m a l r e v i

s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e A t l a n t i c

a n d M a r y l a n d R e p o r t e r s

. U s e r s a r e r e q u e s t

e d t o n o t i f y t h e C l e r k o f t h e C o u r t o f a n y

f o r m a l e r r o r s s o t

h a t c o r r e c t

i o n s m a y b e m a d e b e

f o r e t h e b o u n d v o l u m e s g o t

o p r e s s

.

D I S T R I C T O F C O L U M B I A C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

N o

. 1 4

- B S

- 1 1 0 1

I N R E : A D R I A N C R O N A U E R

, R e s p o n d e n t

. B o a r d D o c k e t N o

. 1 4

- B D

- 0 7 5

B a r R e g i s t r a t i o n N o

. 4 2 7 5 0 3 B D N : 2 2 4

- 1 3

B E F O R E : G l i c k m a n a n d E a s t e r l y

, A s s o c i a t e J u d g e s ; a n d K i n g

, S e n i o r J u d g e

.

O R D E R

( F I L E D

- O c t o b e r 9

, 2 0 1 4 )

O n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e a f f i d a v i t o f A d r i a n C r o n a u e r

, w h e r e i n h e c o n s e n t s t o

d i s b a r m e n t f

r o m t h e B a r o f

t h e D i s t r i c t o f

C o l u m b i a p u r s u a n t t o § 1 2 o f R u l e X I o f

t h e

R u l e s G o v e r n i n g t h e B a r o f t h e D i s t r i c t o f C o l u m b i a C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

, w h i c h a f f i d a v i t

h a s b e e n f

i l e d w i t h t h e C l e r k o f t h i s C o u r t

, a n d t h e r e p o r t a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e

B o a r d o n P r o f

e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y

, i t i s t h i s 9 d a y o f O c t o b e r 2 0 1 4

, th

O R D E R E D t h a t t h e s a i d A d r i a n C r o n a u e r i s h e r e b y d i s b a r r e d b y c o n s e n t

,

e f f e c t i v e f o r t h w i t h

. T h e e f

f e c t i v e d a t e o f r e s p o n d e n t ’ s d i s b a r m e n t s h a l l r u n

, f o r

r e i n s t a t e m e n t p u r p o s e s

, f r o m t h e d a t e r e s p o n d e n t f i l e s h i s a f f i d a v i t p u r s u a n t t o D

. C

. B a r

R u l e X I

, § 1 4 ( g )

.

T h e C l e r k s h a l l p u b l i s h t h i s o r d e r

, b u t t h e a f f i d a v i t s h a l l n o t b e p u b l i c l y d i s c l o s e d

o r o t h e r w i s e m a d e a v a i l a b l e e x c e p t u p o n o r d e r o f t h e c o u r t o r u p o n w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f

t h e r e s p o n d e n t

.

T h e C l e r k s h a l l c a u s e a c o p y o f t h i s o r d e r t o b e t r a n s m i t t e d t o t h e C h a i r m a n o f t h e

B o a r d o n P r o f

e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y a n d t o t h e r e s p o n d e n t

, t h e r e b y g i v i n g h i m n o t i c e

o f t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f R u l e X I

, § § 1 4 a n d 1 6

, w h i c h s e t f o r t h c e r t a i n r i g h t s a n d

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o f d i s b a r r e d a t t o r n e y s a n d t h e e f f e c t o f f a i l u r e t o c o m p l y t h e r e w i t h

.

P E R C U R I A M