alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Certification**I, William J. McGurk, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rockville Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, basedon such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       December 22, 2005   /s/ Mr. William J. McGurk             Mr. William J. McGurk      President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10894]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Expeditors International (Puerto Rico), Inc., 65 Infantry Station, San 
Juan, Puerto Rico 00929, Officers: Kevin M. Walsh, President, Mario 
Alfonso, Treasurer/Secretary/Director
Unitrans International, Inc., 1851 Alexander Bell Drive, #400, Reston, 
VA 22091, Officers: A. Huda Farouki, Director, Mazen T. Farouki, 
President
Barnettt Trading, Inc. d/b/a C2C Ocean Freight Forwarding, 217 Humphrey 
Street, Marblehead, MA 01945-1620, Officers: Andrew L. Barnett, 
President, Michael Ohsman, Director
G & B International, Inc., 755 Route 83, Suite #215, Bensenville, IL 
60106, Officer: Joon Hwan Tae, President
Pacific Wells Crop. d/b/a Pelican Shipping Line, 250 W. Walnut Street, 
Compton, CA 90220, Officer: Woon K. Paik, President
Rimtech Int'l Transport, 460 E. Carson Plaza Drive, #103, Carson, CA 
90746, Officer: Yon S. Kim, President
EMC Shipping, Inc., 4034 E. Mercer Way, Mercer Island, WA 98040, 
Officer: Elizabeth Finch Miller, President

    Dated: April 29, 1996.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10894 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
No. 02

- 17

- 00272

- CR

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH

RICARDO LUCIO SILVA V. THE STATE OF TEXAS

------------------------------

MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

Now comes Ricardo Lucio Silva

, A ppellant in the above styled and

numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant oral argument in this matter. This

motion is made according to Rule 3 9.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

and for good cause appellant shows the Court the following:

Application of Rule 39.1, under the facts and circumstances of this case as set

forth within the trial record demonstrate that oral argument is not unnecessary: (a) the

appeal is not frivolous; (b) the dispositive issue or issues have not been authoritativ ely

decided; (c) the facts and legal arguments, while presented in the briefs and record

entail substantial content and briefing. As a result, Appellant believes (d) the

decisional process would be aided by oral argument. 1

1 Tex. R. App. Proc. 39.1 (2016) ACCEPTED

02-17-00272-CR

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

5/25/2018 4:09 PM

DEBRA SPISAK

CLERKThis appeal presents an importan t issue concerning the unlawful detention of

Appellant by an officer who saw no illegal conduct prior to the detention. Appellant

believes oral argument would aid this Court in reaching a just conclusion.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant makes this

prayer that this request be granted and that oral argument be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

Benjamin E. Hoover

The Nix Law Firm

1401 Holliday, Suite 400

Wichita Falls, Texas 76301

Tel 940.322.9200

Fax 940.228.3233

bhoover@thenixlawfirm.com

By: /s/ Benjamin E Hoover

Benjamin E. Hoover

State Bar No. 24052682

Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The State has indicated it does not seek oral argument in this matter.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On the 25 th day of May, 2018, a copy of the foregoing document was served

upon the following parties by electronic service and the transmission was reported as

complete:Jennifer Ponder

Wichita County District Attorney’s Office

900 7 th Street

Wichita Falls, Texas 7 6301

jennifer.ponder@co.wichita.tx.us

/s/ Benjamin E. Hoover

Benjamin E. Hoover
#### Leonard C. WAHLENMAIER, Petitioner, v. Mary E. WAHLENMAIER, Respondent.

No. C-7607.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 5, 1988.

John G. Hyde, Freeman, Hyde & Martin, Midland, for petitioner

Karen M. Carr, Torres & Carr, Harper Estes and Jimmie D. Oglesby, Lynch, Chap-pell, Allday & Alsup, Midland, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a divorce action. The issue before the court of appeals was whether a guardian or next friend may obtain a divorce on behalf of a mentally incompetent person. That court held that a guardian ad litem or next friend could exercise the right of a mentally ill person to obtain a divorce. 750 S.W.2d 837 (Tex.App. —El Paso 1988). Leonard C. Wahlenmaier has asserted that the act of dissolving the marital relationship may not be exercised by a guardian or next friend.

We approve of the court of appeals holding that a guardian ad litem or next friend can exercise the right of a mentally ill person to obtain a divorce. Those cases in which the courts of appeal have held that a guardian or next friend may not exercise the right of a mentally ill person to obtain a divorce are hereby disapproved. *See Hart v. Hart,*705 S.W.2d 332 (Tex.App.— Austin 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.); *Dillion v. Dillion,*274 S.W. 217 (Tex.Civ.App.— Amarillo 1925, no writ); *Skeen v. Skeen,*190 S.W. 1118 (Tex.Civ.App. — Dallas 1916, no writ).

The application for writ of error filed by Leonard C. Wahlenmaier is denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 15

- 00078

- CV

Brian FREEMAN

, Appellant

v.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

, Appellee

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Edwards County, Texas

Trial Court No. 3724

The Honorable Robert Hoffman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 1, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the

assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d)

(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 8.0

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF ASAT HOLDINGS LIMITED



|                                      |  |                            |  |                                      
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Name of Entity                        |  | Jurisdiction of Formation  |  | Name Under Which Entity Does Business
|ASAT Limited                          |  | Hong Kong                  |  | ASAT Limited                         
|                                      |  |                           
|ASAT, Inc.                            |  | California                 |  | ASAT, Inc.                           
|                                      |  |                           
|ASAT (Finance) LLC                    |  | Delaware                   |  | ASAT (Finance) LLC                   
|                                      |  |                           
|ASAT (Cayman) Limited                 |  | Cayman Islands             |  | ASAT (Cayman) Limited                
|                                      |  |                           
|ASAT (S) Pte. Ltd.                    |  | Singapore                  |  | ASAT (S) Pte. Ltd.                   
|                                      |  |                           
|ASAT Korea Limited                    |  | Korea                      |  | ASAT Korea Limited                   
|                                      |  |                           
|ASAT GmbH                             |  | Germany                    |  | ASAT GmbH                            
|                                      |  |                           
|New ASAT (Finance) Limited            |  | Cayman Islands             |  | New ASAT (Finance) Limited           
|                                      |  |                           
|Timerson Limited                      |  | Hong Kong                  |  | Timerson Limited                     
|                                      |  |                           
|ASAT Semiconductor (Dongguan) Limited |  | Peoples Republic of China |  | ASAT Semiconductor (Dongguan) Limited
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5389

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CANAM URANIUM
      CORP.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Canam
      Uranium Corp. for the quarter ended January 31, 2007, the undersigned, David
      Hayes, Chief Financial Officer of Canam Uranium Corp., does hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended January 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Canam Uranium Corp.




Date:
              March 16, 2007
            
            /s/
              David HayesDavid
                HayesChief
              Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jacob Even-Ezra:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Magal Security Systems
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 8, 2005

/s/Jacob Even-Ezra
------------------
Jacob Even-Ezra
Chief Executive Officer
#### Terrell JENNINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 46066.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 22, 1992.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and BERREY and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

*501The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the amended Annual Report of the company on Form
10-KSB/A-1 for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
companys financial condition and results of operations.



July 13, 2005



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Gordon                     
|Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, George J. Mehm, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S.Helicopter Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’ssecond fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which adverselyaffect the registrant’s

 
       ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005         /s/ George J. Mehm, Jr.   George J. Mehm, Jr.   Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

February 21, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00145-CV

IN RE JONATHAN WASSERBERG, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-32592

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 18, 2020, relator Jonathan Wasserberg filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Larry Weiman, 

presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his January 10, 

2020 order compelling post-judgment discovery.
2

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny 

relator’s motion for emergency stay.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10695]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-28; OTS No. 2243]


Wayne Savings Bank, F.S.B., Wayne, New Jersey; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 17, 1996, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Wayne Savings Bank, F.S.B., Wayne, New Jersey, to convert to the stock 
form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Northeast Regional 
Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 10 Exchange Place, 18th Floor, 
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302.

    Dated: April 25, 1996.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10695 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P