alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7803

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 05-2690

THOMAS S. McCLOSKEY AND KEVIN P. McCLOSKEY

AS CO-ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF PHILIP McCLOSKEY,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

ROBERT S. MUELLER III, IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF

THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on May 16, 2006 is

corrected as follows:

On page 14, line 19, change "alternation" to "alteration"
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the undersigned officers and/or
directors of U.S.I. Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, do and each of
them does, hereby constitute and appoint David L. Eslick and Robert S.
Schneider, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them
with full power to act without the others, for him and in his name, place and
stead, to sign the U.S.I. Holdings Corporation Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2002 and any and all future amendments thereto; and to file said
Form 10-K and any such amendments with all exhibits thereto, and any and all
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 SIGNATURE                                               TITLE                                      DATE
------------------------------------------        ----------------------------------------------------         ---------------
           <S>                                    <C>                                                          <C>

          /s/ David L. Eslick                     Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer              March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------        (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
              David L. Eslick

        /s/ Robert S. Schneider                   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer         March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------        (Principal Financial Officer)
            Robert S. Schneider

         /s/ Jason S. Mitchell                    Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)                    March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------
             Jason S. Mitchell

        /s/ Richard A. Haverland                  Director                                                     March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------
            Richard A. Haverland

          /s/ Thomas A. Hayes                     Director                                                     March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------
              Thomas A. Hayes

       /s/ Philip E. Larson, III                  Director                                                     March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------
           Philip E. Larson, III

           /s/ Robert Spass                       Director                                                     March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------
               Robert Spass

         /s/ Robert F. Wright                     Director                                                     March 28, 2003
------------------------------------------
             Robert F. Wright
</TABLE>
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HACKEL, PENNIX, and BLOSSER

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Dominic I. PANTOVICH

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202300297

_________________________

Decided: 26 January 2024

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Adam J. Workman

Sentence adjudged 15 August 2023 by a special court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a 

military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for five months, and a bad-conduct discharge.1

For Appellant: 

Commander Kyle Calvin Kneese, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with 98 days of pretrial confinement. 
United States v. Pantovich, NMCCA No. 202300297

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case, 

we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct 

in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred.2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON

Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

We note that the military judge failed to announce the assembly of the special 

court-martial. While this was error, we find it was not a jurisdictional defect. Appellant 

does not allege prejudice and we find none. See United States v. Goodwin, 60 M.J. 849, 

850 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2005) (“Our superior court has held that violations of Article 

16, UCMJ, are not jurisdictional, so long as there is ‘substantial compliance’ with its 

requirements. Thus, such errors must be tested for prejudice.”) (internal citations and 

punctuation omitted).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00822

- CR

Kenon MCDONALD

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar Coun ty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR0794 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On October 5, 2017, a ppellant’s court

- appointed attorney filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserted there are

no meritorious issues to rai se on appeal. Counsel certified he served copies of the brief and motion on appellant, provided appellant a copy of the record on appeal, and explained to appellant his right to file a pro se brief. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, n o pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

Now pending before this court is a pro se motion filed by appellant wherein he expresses his desire to file a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Appellant requests a n extension of time in which to file his response. Appellant also requests appointment of new counsel to assist him in preparing his response. Court

- appointed counsel ’s motion to withdraw has not been granted and

he remains as appellant’s attorney of rec or d until such a time as this court rules on his motion. Accordingly, appellant’s request for new counsel is DENIED

.

We GRANT appellant’s request for an extension of time. Appellant’s response is due on

or before December 14, 2017

._________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk o f Court
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Marc Kilbride
Marc Kilbride
Vice President, Treasurer and Manager
(Principal Financial Officer)
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10685]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Receipt of Petition for Federal Acknowledgment of Existence as an 
Indian Tribe

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.9(a) (formerly 25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is 
hereby given that the Biloxi, Chitimacha Confederation of Muskogees, 
Inc., 1112 Daisy Street, Houma, Louisiana 70363, has filed a letter of 
intent to be considered for acknowledgment by the Secretary of the 
Interior that the group exists as an Indian tribe. This letter was 
received by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on October 24, 1995, and 
was signed by members of the group's governing body.
    The petitioner, the Biloxi, Chitimacha Confederation of Muskogees, 
Inc. (BCCM) was part of the United Houma Nation (UHN, #56), which 
received a proposed finding December 22, 1994. The proposed finding 
stated that the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs proposed to decline 
to acknowledge the UHN in that they did not meet all seven mandatory 
critera under 25 CFR Part 83.
    The BCCM shall be treated as a separate petitioner from October 24, 
1995, forward. This is a notice that the petition is under active 
consideration. Notice that the petitioner has separated from the UHN 
will be sent by mail to the Governor of Louisiana, the Attorney General 
of Louisiana, the UHN, and other interested parties. The public comment 
period on the petition and proposed finding ends June 13, 1996. A copy 
of the technical report evaluating the evidence upon which the proposed 
finding was based is available upon written request to the BIA.
    Under Section 83.9(a) and 83.10(i) of the Federal regulations, 
interested parties may submit factual and/or legal arguments in support 
of or in opposition to the group's petition and proposed finding 
simultaneously to the petitioner and the BIA. Any information submitted 
will be made available on the same basis as other information in the 
BIA's files. The petitioner will be provided an opportunity to respond 
to such submissions prior to a final determination regarding the 
petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 1362-MIB, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: March 25, 1996.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-10685 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Theresa Q. Hoffmann, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 21, 2009



/s/ Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Theresa Q. Hoffmann,

Principal Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-1020

TITO ABRANTE,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

PETER ST. AMAND,

Superintendent at MCI-Cedar Junction,

Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of the court issued on February 3, 2010, is

amended as follows:

Delete the first paragraph of footnote 6 on page 8 of the

opinion. Replace it with the following text:

Abrante's only evidence that police did anything

other than ask Maldonado and Melendez whether Abrante had

already discussed his case with them is the testimony of

defense investigator Philip Kass. Kass testified that he

had two conversations with Maldonado: the first, which

lasted about "five minutes or so," was without an

interpreter. Kass ended that conversation after

Maldonado told him that he would be more comfortable with

an interpreter. According to Kass, in that first

conversation, Maldonado told him that police had told

Maldonado that they could help him with his case if he

would talk with them about Abrante. When Kass spoke with

Maldonado again two days later, with the help of an

interpreter, Maldonado made no such statement.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES:
 
       Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
 
       Trump Atlantic City Funding II, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
 
       Trump Atlantic City Funding III, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
 
       Trump Atlantic City Corporation (Delaware corporation)
 
       Trump Casino Services, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company)
 
       Trump Communications, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company)
 
       Trump Plaza Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
 
       Trump Taj Mahal Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY FUNDING II, INC.:
 
       None
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY CORPORATION:
 
       Trump Casino Services, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company) --
1% ownership
 
       Trump Communications, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company) -- 1%
ownership
 
       Trump Plaza Associates (New Jersey general partnership) -- 1% ownership
 
       Trump Taj Mahal Associates (New Jersey general partnership) -- 1%
ownership
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP CASINO SERVICES, L.L.C.:
 
       Trump Communications, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company) --
99% ownership
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP COMMUNICAITONS, L.L.C.:
 
       None
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES:
 
       None
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES:
 
       None
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 111 (Friday, June 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31330-31331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Multi-Omics Studies for Osteoporosis.
    Date: July 9, 2021.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 31331]]

    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Isis S. Mikhail, MD, MPH, DrPH, Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on 
Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2C212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, Tel: 301-402-7704, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cda0a4a6a5aca4a1a48da0aca4a1e3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cba6a2a0a3aaa2a7a28ba6aaa2a7e5a5a2a3e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 7, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-12235 Filed 6-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>