alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20540-20541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11302]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing in the National Register were received by the National Park 
Service before April 27, 1996. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR Part 
60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties 
under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded to 
the National Register, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, 
Washington, DC 20013-7127. Written comments should be submitted by May 
22, 1996.
Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register.

FLORIDA

Monroe County

USS ALLIGATOR, Address Restricted, Islamoranda vicinity, 96000581

GEORGIA

McDuffie County

Pine Top Farm, Jct. of US 78 and US 278, 2 mi. E of Thomson, Thomson 
vicinity, 96000582

[[Page 20541]]

KANSAS

Sedgwick County

Monroe--Mahan House, 1357 S. Broadway, Wichita, 96000583

NEVADA

White Pine County

Osceola (East) Ditch, Starting .5 mi. E of Grouse Canyon and running 
approximately 18 mi. SE to Lehman Cr., Great Basin National Park, 
Baker vicinity, 96000584

NEW YORK

New York County

Mount Morris Park Historic District (Boundary Increase), Roughly 
bounded by Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. Blvd. and Mt. Morris Park W. 
from W. 118th to W. 124th Sts., New York, 96000585

TEXAS

Bexar County

Calcasieu Building, 202-214 Broadway, San Antonio, 96000588

Dallas County

Titche--Goettinger Department Store, 1901 Main St., Dallas, 96000586

Harris County

Lewis Apartment Building, 2815-2817 Smith St., Houston, 96000587

UTAH

Cache County

Richmond Relief Society Hall (Mormon Church Buildings in Utah MPS), 
15 E. Main St., Richmond, 96000589

Sampete County

Moroni Opera House, Jct. of UT 132 and W. Main St., Moroni, 96000589

VIRGINIA

Franklin County

Cahas Mountain Rural Historic District, Jct. of VA 613 and US 220, 
Peak of Cahas Mt. to near Roanoke Co. line, Boones Mill, 96000593

Rockbridge County

Kennedy--Lunsford Farm, Approximately .5 mi. S of VA 606, near jct. 
with VA 604, Raphine, 96000592

Salem Independent County

Downtown Salem Historic District, Roughly, Main St. from Broad St. 
to College Ave., Salem, 96000591

    The following property was omitted from a previous Notification of 
Pending Nominations list:

OREGON

Lane County

Amazon Family Housing Complex, Jct. of Patterson St. and 22nd Ave., 
Eugene, 95000090

[FR Doc. 96-11302 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EarthLink, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rolla P. Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



|/s/ ROLLA P. HUFFRolla P. Huff
Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 2008 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18598-18599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10570]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:00 a.m. on 
Tuesday, April 23, 1996, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider (1) matters 
relating to the Corporation's corporate and supervisory activities,

[[Page 18599]]

and (2) an administrative enforcement proceeding.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Jonathan L. Fiechter (Acting 
Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), Ms. Susan F. Krause, acting in 
the place and stead of Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of the 
Currency), and Chairman Ricki Helfer, that Corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' 
notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), 
and (c)(10) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and 
(c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: April 24, 1996.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10570 Filed 4-24-96; 3:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Moldflow Scandinavia AB (Sweden)
Moldflow International Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
Moldflow Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
Moldflow Italia s.r.l. (Italy)
Moldflow Korea Limited (Korea)
Moldflow (Europe) Ltd. (United Kingdom)
Moldflow Vertriebs GmbH (Germany)
Moldflow Japan KK (Japan)
Moldflow Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
Moldflow France S.A.S (France)
Moldflow BV (Netherlands)
Moldflow Taiwan, Inc. (Taiwan)
Moldflow Ireland, Ltd. (Ireland)
Moldflow Iberia sl (Spain)
Advanced CAE Technology, Inc. (New York)
Branden Technologies, Inc. (Oregon)
Moldflow Merger Corp. (Delaware)
Moldflow (Guangzhou)  Ltd. (China)
Moldflow Mauritius Pty. Ltd. (Mauritius)
Moldflow Securities Corp. (Massachusetts)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Miami University (WB21-40—6/1/21) for permission to use data from the Board's 1983-2019 Unmasked Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Board's website under docket no. WB21-40.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.                

Eden Besera,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2021-12025 Filed 6-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
3/JWS"

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 10-14-00031-CR OFFENSE: Speeding

STYLE: Robert Scott Shearer v. The State of Texas COUNTY: Brazos

TRIAL COURT: County Court at Law No 2

TRIAL COURT #: 5054-A

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. James W. Locke

DISPOSITION: Dismissed

DATE: January 15, 2015

JUSTICE: Scoggins

PUBLISH: ~~

PC S YES

DNP: YES

Appellant's MOTION

FOR REHEARING IS: DENIED

DATE: February 19, 2015

JUDGE:

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APPBR:

8/4/2014 SUPPCLKRECORD:

SUPPRPTRECORD:

SUPP BR:

PROSE BR:

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

PRO S£ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

^F^ft>

DATE: dW&t/pO/f

JUDGE: fsMlM*-^,

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

. MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA# 11%

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

Y OF MAN

ON

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR STA DATE IS:

JUDGE:
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, William Dwyer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-KSB of Raser Technologies, Inc., (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 28, 2005 |  | /s/ William Dwyer      
|(Date)         |  | William Dwyer,         
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL CLARK

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











---

EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of IMA Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Clark, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:  April 7, 2009









Michael Clark

Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### David Lee McLENDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66918.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 21, 1995.

John M. Schilmoeller, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David Lee McLendon, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of Cape Girardeau denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.2










Exhibit 10.2




EQUITY GRANTS FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Adopted by the Board of Directors on May 4, 2010




On May 11, 2010, each of the non-employee directors will be granted options to purchase Common
Stock of Home Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) having a value of $21,000. The exercise price for
the options to be issued will be the closing price of a share of the Company’s Common Stock as
reflected on the New York Stock Exchange on May 11, 2010 (the “Closing Price”). The number of
options to be granted will be calculated by dividing the award value by the value of each option
determined using the Black-Scholes formula.



On May 11, 2010, each of the non-employee directors also will be granted shares of the Company’s
restricted stock having a value of $63,000. The number of shares of restricted stock to be granted
will be calculated by dividing the awarded value by the Closing Price.



The options and the restricted stock will be granted pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 2008
Stock Benefit Plan, as amended.



The options will vest 20% on each of the first five grant date anniversaries (May 11 of 2011, 2012,
2013, 2014 and 2015) and terminate 10 years after the grant date. The restrictions on the
restricted stock will lapse on the fifth anniversary of the grant date.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                                 1997         1996         1995
Basic earnings per share:
Net earnings (loss).........................  $2,033,114  $(177,626)  $2,026,007
Common shares...............................   2,036,990   2,010,798   1,990,724
Per share amount............................       1.00         (.09)       1.02

Diluted earnings per share:
Net earnings (loss).........................  $2,033,114  $(177,626)  $2,026,007
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options     19,576      8,099       71,773
Diluted earnings (loss) per share...........        .99        (.09)         .98
#### James Arthur MOLITOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 526-92.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Sept. 22, 1993.

Paul Decuir, Jr., Burnet, for appellant.

Ken Anderson, Dist. Atty., Sally Ray, Asst. Dist. Atty., Georgetown, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON MOTION TO ABATE APPEAL

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of murder. The jury assessed punishment at life.

Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. *Molitor v. State,*827 S.W.2d 512 (Tex.App.—Austin 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review. In an opinion delivered on June 16, 1993, we reversed the judgment of the court *616of appeals upon concluding that court had erroneously upheld the trial court’s refusal to submit appellant’s requested jury instruction on the lesser included offense of criminally negligent homicide. *Molitor v. State*(Tex.Cr.App. No. 526-92, delivered June 16,1993).

The State has filed a motion to abate the appeal. Attached to the motion is a certified copy of appellant’s certificate of death. The certificate recites that appellant died on March 31, 1993.

The death of an appellant during the pen-dency of an appeal deprives both this Court and the court of appeals of jurisdiction. See *Garcia v. State,*840 S.W.2d 957 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). Under these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is the abatement of the appeal. Tex.R.App.Pro. Rule 9(b). Accordingly, the State’s motion for rehearing is dismissed, the prior opinion is withdrawn, and the appeal is permanently abated.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

RAUL GUADALUPE MONJARDIN

IRIBE,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 10419

D.C. No. 5:15

- cr

- 00375

- EJD

- 3

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 201 9 **

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN , Circuit Judges.

Raul Guadalupe Monjardin

- Iribe appeals from the district court’s judgment

and challenges the 175

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea

conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute

cocaine and methamphetamine , and distributio n and possession with intent to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 10419

distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1) , (b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B) and

846

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Monjardin

- Iribe contends that the senten ce is substantively unreasonable in

light of his mitigating circumstances, including the short time he was involved in

the conspiracy and his lack of criminal histo ry. The district court did not abuse its

discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The within

Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the large

quantity of drugs Monjardin

- Iribe possessed
, the substantial role he played in the

off ense, and his attempt to obstruct the investigation

. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51.

C ontrary to Monjardin

- Iribe’s contention, the court did not “mechanically” apply

the Guidelines in fashioning his sentence, but rather engaged in the type of

individualized as sessment of the sentencing factors required under section 3553(a)

. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 994 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Moreover, the court sufficiently addressed Monjardin

- Iribe’s sentencing disparity

argument, did not rely on any cl early erroneous facts in imposing the sentence, and

adequately explained the sentence. See id. at 992

- 93

. We decline to consider issues raised for the first time in Monjardin

- Iribe’s

reply brief. See United States v. Kama , 394 F.3d 1236, 1238 (9th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Lawrence R. Miller
Lawrence R. MillerChief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Kimberly D. Barrs
Kimberly D. BarrsChief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------