alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CompassLearning, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin E. Kenney, Jr., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) Based on the officer's knowledge, the Report fully complies with
             the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
             Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) Based on the officer's knowledge, the information contained in the
             Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
             condition and results of operation of CompassLearning, Inc.


/s/ Martin E. Kenney, Jr.


---------------------------------------
Martin E. Kenney, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9372]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-219]

Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License; GPU Nuclear 
Corporation

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Commission) has issued 
Amendment No. 179 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 issued to 
GPU Nuclear Corporation (the licensee), which revised the Technical 
Specifications for operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating 
Station located in Ocean County, New Jersey. The amendment is effective 
as of the date of issuance, to be implemented within 30 days of 
issuance.
    The amendment revises Technical Specification 5.3.1.E to allow 2645 
fuel assemblies to be stored in the fuel pool. This is an increase of 
45 fuel assemblies from the current limit of 2600 fuel assemblies. The 
45 additional storage locations currently exist in the racks in the 
fuel pool.
    The application for the amendment complies with the standards and 
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), 
and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made 
appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules 
and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license 
amendment.
    Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment and Opportunity 
for Hearing in connection with this action was published in the Federal 
Register on December 20, 1994 (59 FR 65542). No request for a hearing 
or petition for leave to intervene was filed following this notice.
    The Commission has prepared an Environmental Assessment related to 
the action and has determined not to prepare an environmental impact 
statement. Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission has 
concluded that the issuance of the amendment will not have a 
significant effect on the quality of the human environment (60 FR 
17373).
    For further details with respect to the action see (1) the 
application for amendment dated November 25, 1994, as supplemented 
February 15, 1995, and (2) Amendment No. 179 to License No. DPR-16, (3) 
the Commission's related Safety Evaluation, and (4) the Commission's 
Environmental Assessment. All of these items are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
document room located at the Ocean County Library, Reference 
Department, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of April 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Alexander W. Dromerick, Sr.,
Project Manager, Project Directorate I-3, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-9372 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
```
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                       |                          |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                              |                                       |                          |
| Date:                May 30, 2007 | By                               | /s/ Charles              Benz |
|                              | Charles                Benz                |
|                              | Principal                Executive Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11086]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON PROTECTING AND REDUCING GOVERNMENT SECRECY


Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., May 16, 1996.

PLACE: Fifth Floor Theater, National Archives and Records 
Administration, 7th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: As part of its responsibility under Pub. L. 
103-236 to make ``comprehensive proposals for reform'' designed ``to 
reduce the volume of information classified and thereby to strengthen 
the protection of legitimately classified information,'' the Commission 
will convene a public roundtable to address the current state of public 
access to government information, in particular national security 
information, and receive suggestions for proposed reforms. Public 
participation at the meeting is encouraged. The Commission also 
welcomes written submissions from the public on the issues to be 
discussed at the meeting. Due to limited room capacity, the Commission 
requests all persons interested in attending the public roundtable to 
pre-register by phone at (202) 776-8739 or by fax at (202) 776-8773.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Pauline Treviso, Commission on 
Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy. The phone number is (202) 
776-8739; the fax is (202) 776-8773.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Eric R. Biel,
Staff Director, Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government 
Secrecy.
[FR Doc. 96-11086 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-ER-M
Order entered January 24, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00872
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF L .M.C AND E.H.C., CHI LDREN On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21 9
- 54113
- 2010 

### O RDER By postcard dated September 30, 2013 we notified Court Reporter Indu Bailey that the reporter’s record in this case was overdue. We directed Ms. Bailey to file the reporter’s record within thirty days. In response, Ms. Bailey notifie d the Court that no designation or payment arrangements had been made to produce the record. The Court then directed appellant to provide verification that he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or that he had been found entitled to p roceed without payment of costs. By letter dated October 25, 2013, appellant notified the Court that he had “requested the reporter’s record and has made payment and further payment arrangements with the reporter.” Therefore, we ORDER Indu Bailey to file the reporter’ s record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit
10.4


 


Aventine Renewable Energy
Holdings, Inc. Director Compensation


 


Cash
Compensation


 


·                                          $50,000 annual cash retainer, payable in equal quarterly installments;


·                                          Additional $25,000 annual retainer to the chairman of the Board;


·                                          Additional committee chair retainers of $10,000 per year for the chair of
the audit committee and $5,000 for other committee chairs;


·                                          $1,500 per Board meeting attended ($750 for telephonic meetings); and


·                                          $750 per committee meeting attended, either in person or by phone.


 


Equity
Compensation


 


·                                          Annual grant at
the beginning of each year in the amount of $35,000 in restricted stock units (“RSU”), which vest after one year of
the grant;


·                                          Additional
annual grant at the beginning of each year in the amount of $40,000 RSU to the
chairman of the Board;


·                                          After vesting,
RSU must be held for the duration of a director’s Board service, and they will
only be converted into shares after retirement or other termination.


 


Note: the CEO will not be entitled to any of the
foregoing terms.


 


1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Darl C. McBride

Darl C. McBridePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    January 26, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 110 (Thursday, June 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-847]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambrex Charles 
City

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Cambrex Charles City has applied to be registered as an 
importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before July 12, 2021. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before July 12, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
request for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on May 6, 2021, Cambrex Charles City, 1205 11th Street, 
Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, applied to be registered as an importer 
of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-Anilino-N-Phenethyl-4-Piperidine          8333  II
 (ANPP).
Phenylacetone..........................     8501  II
Coca leaves............................     9040  II
Opium, raw.............................     9600  II
Poppy Straw Concentrate................     9670  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substances for 
internal use and to bulk manufacture other controlled substances in 
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) form for distribution to its 
customers. No other activity for these drug codes is authorized for 
this registration.

William T. McDermott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-12215 Filed 6-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Ex parte Shawn Patrick Childers

Appellate case number s : 01

- 21

- 00493

- C R

Trial court case number: 19005

Trial court: 21st District Court of Washington County

Appellant, Shawn Patrick Childers, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s September 2, 2021 order denying his second pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus.

The record on appeal does not include a copy of the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right of appeal from the order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2) (“The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order other than an order appealable under Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 64.”) ; see also Ex parte

Estrada , 573 S.W.3d 884, 890 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2019, no pet.) ( acknowledging inclusion in supplemental clerk’s record of certification of defendant’s right to appeal denial of pretrial habeas application); Ex parte Tarango , 116 S.W.3d 201, 203 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2003, no pet.) (concluding that order de nying habeas relief is appealable order within meaning of Rule 25.2( a ) (2) and therefore subject to Rule 25.2(d) certification requirement ) . A certification that is not included as part of the record may be supplement ed pursuant to an order of the appellate court under Rule 34.5(c)(2). T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(2)

. “The appeal must be dismissed if a

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of

the record under thes e rules.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, the Court directs the trial court to execute a certification of appellant’s right of appeal that complies with Rule 25.2 and that indicates whether appellant has the right to appeal from the trial court’s Sep tember 2, 2021 order denying his second pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus.The Court further directs the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record

containing a certification of appellant’s right of appeal and any other order, findings, or recommendations the trial court deems appropriate. The supplemental clerk’s record shall

be filed no late r than 30 days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(2).

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from the Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental

clerk’s record is filed with the Clerk of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April L. Farris

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 16, 2021
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  BioForce  Nanosciences
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Eric  Henderson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   ERIC HENDERSON
--------------------------------
Eric Henderson
Chief Executive Officer
November 17, 2006



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
         this  written  statement  has been  provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing  certifications are
         accompanying  the Company's Form 10-QSB solely  pursuant to section 906
         of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350,  chapter  63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

RONALD CURTIS SEATON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 957 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Kenneth R. NielsenKenneth R. NielsenChief Financial Officer/Chief Accounting OfficerDate:
    
    January 29, 2009
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60094 Summary Calendar

DANIEL GEORGE CORRING , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. PEARL RIVER COUNTY; RITA LUMPKIN , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:11

- CV

- 262

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Daniel George Corring, Mississippi prisoner # 170298, appeals the dismissal on summary judgment of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were vi olated by the defendants’ deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs when he was a detainee in the Pearl River County jail

. We affirm.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60094 Document: 00512478886 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2013No. 13

- 60094

We find no basis in the record for crediting the complaint’s conclusory contentions that Rita Lumpkin was del iberately indifferent to Corring’s
medical needs. See Hathaway v. Bazany , 507 F.3d 312, 319 (5th Cir. 2007).
T he record shows at most that Corring disagreed with Lumpkin about his treatment regimen or that she was arguably negligent or committed malpractice , none of which constitutes a sufficient bas i s for casting Lumpkin in judgment under § 1983

. S ee S tewart v. Murphy , 174 F.3d 530, 534 (5th Cir. 1999) ; Banuelos v. McFarland , 41 F.3d 232, 235 (5th Cir. 1995)

. Additionall y,

as Corring failed to establish an underlying constitutional violation by Lumpkin, i.e., deliberate indifference by her to his serious medical needs, Pearl River County cannot be liable on his theory that it had an official policy of failing to train its agents. See Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss. , 74 F.3d 633, 649
n.4 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). The judgment is AFFIRMED. Corring’s motions for oral argument and for appointment of counsel are DENIED.

2 Case: 13-60094 Document: 00512478886 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2013