alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.6


                           E. W. BLANCH HOLDINGS, INC.
                            MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

This document explains the terms of the Management Incentive Plan (the Plan) of
E. W. Blanch Holdings, Inc. (the Company, Holdings, or Holdings Company).

Participants
------------
                    Edgar W. Blanch, Jr.    Chris L. Walker
                    Rodman R. Fox           Frank S. Wilkinson, Jr.
                    Ian D. Packer

Funding
-------
The sum of the following two components equals the total amount of the Plan
pool:

1.   20% of the 1998 pre-tax profits in excess of 20% growth over 1997 pre-tax
     profits, adjusted for the 1997 Plan expense.

                    1997 pre-tax profits              $43,161,592
                    Add back 1997 Plan expense          1,093,000
                                                      -----------
                                                      $44,254,592
                    Times Growth Goal (120%)                 1.20
                                                      -----------

                    1998 pre-tax profit goal          $53,105,510

2.   37.5% of the aggregate amount awarded to the E. W. Blanch Holdings, Inc,
     Incentive Plan (for all other employees) will be allocated to the bonus
     pool.

Any stock acquisitions or stock offerings may require adjustment to the
measurement of earnings to ensure that the cost of capital is recognized.

Allocation and Payment
----------------------
Mr. Blanch shall be paid 50% of the Plan pool. The Committee may not increase
this percentage allocation, but may, at its discretion, reduce it. Awards will
be allocated to the other participants from the remaining funds in the Plan
pool, based upon the Committee's judgment of their performance and contributions
during the year. Additionally, individual bonuses paid to the participants may
not exceed 100% of their respective base salaries.

Funds available for distribution shall be paid no later than March 15, 1999. In
order to be eligible to receive an award, a participant must be an employee of
the Company on the date such award is to be paid.

Administration and Amendments
-----------------------------
The Company's shareholders must approve the Plan. The Plan shall then be
administered, construed and interpreted by the Committee. The Plan shall be
effective for the Company's 1998 fiscal year.

The Committee may require that Plan participants enter into written
participation agreements, in such form or forms as the Committee shall deem
appropriate.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 110 / Thursday, June 10, 2021 / Presidential Documents 31083 

Notice of June 8, 2021 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Western Balkans 

On June 26, 2001, by Executive Order 13219, the President declared a 

national emergency with respect to the Western Balkans pursuant to the 

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to 

deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security 

and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions of persons 

engaged in, or assisting, sponsoring, or supporting, (i) extremist violence 

in the former Republic of Macedonia (what is now the Republic of North 

Macedonia) and elsewhere in the Western Balkans region, or (ii) acts obstructing implementation of the Dayton Accords in Bosnia or United Nations 

Security Council Resolution 1244 of June 10, 1999, in Kosovo. The President 

subsequently amended that order in Executive Order 13304 of May 28, 

2003, to take additional steps with respect to certain actions that obstruct 

implementation of, among other things, the Ohrid Framework Agreement 

of 2001 relating to Macedonia. 

The actions of persons threatening the peace and international stabilization 

efforts in the Western Balkans, including acts of extremist violence and 

obstructionist activity, continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this 

reason, the national emergency declared on June 26, 2001, must continue 

in effect beyond June 26, 2021. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency declared with respect to the Western Balkans 

in Executive Order 13219. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

June 8, 2021. [FR Doc. 2021–12383 

Filed 6–9–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F1–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOC2BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.1     DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350     Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DAC Technologies Group International,Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),David A. Collins, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.                 /s/ David A. Collins   David A. Collins, Chairman, CEO and Principal Executive Officer      Date:March 31, 2006
# Cidk Saitta 

# Pideu Pickering Parraguirre Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.'

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Gordon & Rees, LLP Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas Castle & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, petitioners' motion for a stay is denied.

SUPREME COURT

OF 2 NEVADA (0) 1947A .1•:.
#### Edward L. CLARY, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Appellant.

No. WD 47609.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 22, 1994.

*472Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Steve D. Burmeister, Independence, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN,.JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The Director of Revenue.appeals an order reinstating the' driver’s license of Edward L. Clary after his revocation for refusal to submit to chemical testing under § 577.041, RSMo Supp.1992 (effective 7-1-92, now repealed).

This court reverses the order of reinstatement.

The Director argues that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Mr. Clary failed to name the Director of Revenue as a party in his petition for hearing. In support, the Director cites *Cox v. Director of Revenue,*858 S.W.2d 844 (Mo.App.1993). In *Cox,*this district determined that the Director of Revenue must be named as a necessary party in a petition for hearing under § 577.041. *Id.*at 847. Mr. Clary does not dispute his failure to name the Director as a party defendant. He requests reconsideration of the *Cox*decision.

*Cox*has been upheld and followed in two recent decisions of this district. Both *Riley v. Director of Revenue,*869 S.W.2d 273, 275 (Mo.App.1994), and *Webb v. Director of Revenue,*864 S.W.2d 20, 21 (Mo.App.1993), hold that failure to name the Director as a party in a § 577.041 petition deprives the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction. These recent decisions dispel any need for reconsideration.

To be a party, a person must be named in the original pleading or be later added by appropriate court order. *Kelley v. Missouri Dep’t of Revenue,*827 S.W.2d 767, 768 (Mo.App.1992). Here, Mr. Clary’s petition bore the caption, “IN RE EDWARD L. CLARY.” No order making the Director a party ensued during the proceedings. The directive in the petition to notify the Director was insufficient to make the Director a party. *Webb,*864 S.W.2d at 21.

The trial court lacked jurisdiction to reinstate Mr. Clary’s driver’s license because he failed to name the Director as a party. The order reinstating Mr. Clary’s driver’s license is accordingly reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10575]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Mid Atlantic Regional Consortium for Advanced 
Vehicles (MARCAV)

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 9, 1996, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), the participants in the Mid 
Atlantic Regional Consortium for Advanced Vehicles (``MARCAV'') Joint 
Ventures have filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and with the Federal Trade Commission disclosing a 
change in project membership. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, the following party has become a member in MARCAV: 
Tribology Systems, Inc. of World Flywheel Consortium, Paoli, PA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or the 
planned activities of the Consortium.
    On July 24, 1995, MARCAV filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
February 29, 1996 (61 FR 7805).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-10575 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Tatiana Golovina, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
6. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
7. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
8. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
9. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
10. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
11. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 12th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Tatiana Golovina
Tatiana Golovina
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TRX, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 23, 2009



/s/ H. Shane HammondH. Shane HammondChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ David D. CathcartDavid D. CathcartChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael A. HILMERSON, Appellant.

No. WD 50327.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 2, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 27, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Craig F. Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a jury conviction of first degree deviate sexual assault, § 566.070, RSMo. (1986). Appellant seeks plain error review, Rule 30.20, on introduction of evidence.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 10.14


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is
made as of the 21st day of June, 2006, by and by and between EagleBank,
a Maryland corporation (“Eagle”), and Susan G. Riel (“Riel”).


RECITAL


The parties desire to amend as
set forth herein the Employment Agreement dated January 13, 2004 entered into
by the parties (the “Employment Agreement”).


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the premises the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to modify, amend and/or
supplement the Employment Agreement as hereinafter set forth:


1.             Section
2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the
following is substituted therefor:


“2.1         Position.  Eagle
hereby employs Riel to serve as Chief Operating Officer of Eagle.”


2.             Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted therefor:


“3.1 Nature and Substance. Riel shall report directly to
and shall be under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer of Eagle. The
specific powers and duties of Riel shall be established, determined and
modified by and within the discretion of the Board.”


3.             All provisions of the Employment Agreement not modified, amended and/or
supplemented hereby, are hereby ratified and confirmed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first written.


	
  EagleBank

  	
  Susan G. Riel

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Susan G. Riel

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Eagle Bancorp, Inc.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:
EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board 0f Directors
Nationwide Auction Systems:

We consent to the  inclusion of our report dated March 5, 1999,  with respect to
the combined balance sheet of Nationwide Auction Systems as of December 31, 1998
and the related combined statements of earnings and retained earnings,  and cash
flows for each of the years in the two year  period  ended  December  31,  1998,
which  report is included in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K/A of Entrade  Inc.
dated April 7, 2000.



/s/ KPMG LLP




Los Angeles, California
April 7, 2000







                                      E-8
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Walter PAIGE, Jr., Defendant/Appellant.

No. 63951.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 3, 1995.

Daniel P. Reardon, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Defendant appeals following his convictions by a jury of second degree murder, § 565.021 RSMol986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMol986. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to submit an instruction on self-defense. We find no error. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Taohuayuan Culture Tourism
Co., Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Cai Danmei,
the Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                       NEW TAOHUAYUAN CULTURE TOURISM CO., LTD.



May 17, 2006                           /s/ Cai Danmei
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Cai Danmei, Chief Executive and Principal
                                       Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5900 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5900

 To prohibit individuals from publicizing certain information relating 
                        to security clearances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2023

                Mr. Gaetz introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit individuals from publicizing certain information relating 
                        to security clearances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Security Clearance Revolving Door 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PUBLICIZING CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO 
              SECURITY CLEARANCES.

    (a) Prohibition on Publicizing Certain Information Relating to 
Security Clearance.--Chapter 93 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1925. Prohibition on publicizing certain information relating to 
              security clearances
    ``(a) Offense.--Whoever, having received notice of a favorable 
adjudication with respect to a security clearance investigation, 
periodic reinvestigation, or other determination of eligibility to 
access classified information by an authorized adjudicative agency, 
publishes the fact of such favorable adjudication during the period of 
the current investigation file shall be fined not more than $1000, 
imprisoned for a term of not more than one year, or both.
    ``(b) Exception.--It shall not be an offense under this section for 
an individual who has received a favorable adjudication specified in 
subsection (a) to include the fact of such favorable adjudication in 
connection with an application for a position of employment or for a 
governmental contract (or a subcontract thereof), where such favorable 
adjudication is a requirement for such employment or contract.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section, the terms `authorized 
adjudicative agency', `current investigation file', and `periodic 
reinvestigation' have the meanings given those terms in section 3001(a) 
of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 
U.S.C. 3341(a)).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the beginning of 
chapter 93 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 1924 the following new section:

``1925. Prohibition on publicizing certain information relating to 
                            security clearances.''.
                                 <all>
```