alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John L. Anhorn, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: March 8, 2007 |  | /s/ JOHN L. ANHORN     
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | John L. Anhorn         
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer

---
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy JONES, Defendant/Appellant. Timothy JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 65014, 67225.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 11, 1995.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., AHRENS, P.J., and KAROHL, J.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to thirty years imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender under § 558.016, RSMo 1994. Defendant appeals this judgment and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kent M. ROEDNER, Appellant; Kent M. ROEDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64722, 66310.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

March 28, 1995.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 1995.

Charles C. Schwartz, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kent M. Roedner, appeals his convictions for attempted rape and attempted sodomy. While not briefed on appeal and therefore abandoned, Defendant originally consolidated with the direct appeal an appeal from denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.
#### In the Matter of Anthony S., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Kathryn McDonald, J.), entered August 1, 1985, finding that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, attempted escape in the second degree and obstructing governmental administration, and which granted appellant a conditional discharge on condition that he be placed under the jurisdiction of New Jersey courts, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the order summarily denying the motion to suppress and remanding for further proceedings, without costs.

On appeal, respondent argues, *inter alia,*that the court at the fact-finding hearing improperly exercised its discretion in summarily denying his oral motion to suppress the gun seized. We agree. Although a motion to suppress is required to be made prior to the fact finding *(see,*Family Ct Act § 330.2 [2]), if good cause is shown why the motion was not made prior to the commencement of the fact finding, a court may entertain the motion *(see,*Family Ct Act § 330.2 [2]; § 332.2 [3]).

Because the respondent was detained, and the petition’s highest count was less than a C felony, a fact-finding hearing was required to be commenced no more than three days after the conclusion of the initial appearance *(see,*Family Ct Act § 340.1). At the fact finding, respondent’s counsel orally moved to suppress the gun seized, explaining that her delinquency in bringing the motion was due to her appointment as counsel only four days prior to the fact finding and because of her lack of opportunity to communicate with the detained respondent. Under these circumstances, we find that it was an abuse of discretion not to entertain respondent’s motion. We also note that a compelling argument for suppression is made by counsel which, if proved, would warrant suppression and dismissal of the petition. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Wallach, JJ. *[See,*162 AD2d 325.]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 25, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00083

- CV

Steve Cokins and Anita Cokins, Individually and on Behalf of the North Brooks Hollow Road Area, Appellant

v.

City of Lakeway, Appellee

APPEAL F ROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

--

OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD ; CONCURRING OPINION B Y CHIEF JUSTICE JONE S

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard o n the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the following portions

of the trial court’s judgment dismissing the Landowners’ claims that the annexation of the North

Brooks Hollow Road Area is void : IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that

the judgment of the trial court is reversed as to those claims and that those portions of the cause

be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with t his Court’s opinion. We

affirm only that part of the judgment dismissing the Landowners’ procedural challenges to the

City’s ordinance annexing the North Brooks Hollow Road Area

. It is FURTHER ordered thateach par ty shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court

below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry SMITH, Appellant.

No. WD 48698.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 14, 1995.

James C. Cox, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Smith appeals his conviction for selling a controlled substance within 1000 feet of a school, § 195.214, RSMo 1994, and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no jurisprudential purpose in publishing a written opinion, we issue this summary order. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Connie Linder, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Panorama
     Investments Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
6th day of April, 2006.


/s/ Connie Linder
------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AS REQUIRED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 1.     | The                accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended                June                30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 2.     | The                information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of QPC                Lasers,                Inc.                                                                    |

----
KEITH HENRY

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CA SE NO. 1D 15

- 3762

Opinion filed October 2, 2015.

Petition for Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Keith Henry, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Infrastructure Investment
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      February 17, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Li XipengName:
                Li
      XipengTitle:
                Chief
      Executive Officer, Principal ExecutiveOfficer
      and Chairman of the
Board





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to China Infrastructure Investment Corporation
will be retained by China Infrastructure Investment Corporation and
furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5422 

To require FinCEN to establish a small business working group, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023 

Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas (for himself and Mrs. BEATTY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require FinCEN to establish a small business working 

group, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Work5 ing Group Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS WORKING GROUPS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 310(g)(5)(A) of title 31, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in clause (vi) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5422 IH

1 (2) in clause (vii) by striking the period at the 

2 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by inserting the following at the end: 

4 ‘‘(viii) each year, hold a small busi5 ness working group to— 

6 ‘‘(I) share information about the 

7 effectiveness of beneficial ownership 

8 information; 

9 ‘‘(II) promote coordination be10 tween FinCEN and the small business 

11 community; and 

12 ‘‘(III) and provide guidance to 

13 small businesses about beneficial own14 ership reporting obligations.’’. 

15 (b) APPROPRIATIONS.—No additional amounts may 

16 be appropriated to carry out the amendments made by 

17 subsection (a). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO						18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,						AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO						SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lodge Bay Oil & Gas Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  , 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.			Dated: September 10, 2007                                                 /s/ Barry Swanson                                                                                                                          Barry Swanson				                                                                                            President, CEO, CFO, Secretary,				                                                                                            Treasurer and Director

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of OC Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert W. Hughes,
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer and I, Danny E. Hosler, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2006

/s/ ROBERT W. HUGHES
------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Hughes
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ DANNY E. HOSLER
------------------------------------------------
Danny E.Hosler
Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7041

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Jennifer ENGEL and Richard N. Kuhn, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Eva Marie REIMER, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67221.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 3, 1995.

David G. Waltrip, Jones, Korum, Waltrip & Jones, Clayton, for appellant.

V. Jack Muehlenkamp, Muehlenkamp *&*Pankowski, Dellwood, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of her motions for leave to file a compulsory counterclaim. We affirm. We have examined the record and find that the court properly denied defendant’s motions. No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31


       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, William P. Beckmann, Chief Servicing and Technology Officer of Citigroup
Inc., certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
      8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
      periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
      CitiFinancial Mortgage Securities Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
      does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
      a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
      the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based upon my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided
      to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement
      is included in these reports;

4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
      under the pooling and servicing agreements and based upon my knowledge and
      the annual compliance review required under the pooling and servicing
      agreements, and except as disclosed in the report, the servicer has
      fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements; and

5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
      servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
      report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
      Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
      servicing agreements.



Date: March 22, 2004


   /s/ William P. Beckmann
------------------------------
Name:  William P. Beckmann
Title: Chief Servicing and
       Technology Officer