alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1997-1998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1064]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service


Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Currently, the IRS is soliciting 
comments concerning an existing regulation, 26 CFR 601.201, 
Instructions for Requesting Rulings and Determination Letters.


[[Page 1998]]

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 25, 1996 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Garrick R. Shear, Internal 
Revenue Service, room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the information collection should be directed to Martha R. 
Brinson, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue Service, room 5571, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Instructions for Requesting Rulings and Determination 
Letters.
    OMB Number: 1545-0819.
    Regulation Project Number: 26 CFR 601.201.
    Abstract: The IRS issues ruling letters and determination letters 
to taxpayers interpreting and applying the tax laws to a specific set 
of facts. The procedural regulations set forth the instructions for 
requesting ruling and determination letters.
    Current Actions: There is no change to the collection of 
information in this existing regulation.
    Type of Review: Extension of OMB approval.
    Affected Public: All taxpayers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 271,914.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: The estimated annual burden per 
respondent varies from 15 minutes to 1 hour, depending on individual 
circumstances, with an estimated average of 55 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 248,496.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Written comments should address the 
accuracy of the burden estimates and ways to minimize burden including 
the use of automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of 
information technology, as well as other relevant aspects of the 
information collection request.

    Approved: January 17, 1996.
Garrick R. Shear,
IRS Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-1064 Filed 1-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Order entered September 26, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00386-CV

IN RE HAMP WILLIAMS TRUST

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08491

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 24, 2018 motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to Monday, October 15, 2018.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Hoover GATES, Jane Gates and Sheridan Gates v. The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY.

No. C-9097.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1989.

Petitioners’ application for writ of error as amended is *granted.*Petitioners’ motion to dismiss is also granted.

The judgments and opinions of the courts below are *vacated*and *set aside*and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties. (Respondent’s motion to dismiss is overruled.)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5028

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 16, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 16, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0251. IN THE INTEREST OF P. H. P., A CHILD (MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

02816J0753
<PAGE>

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                             1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                       OF
                          PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.


     Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, formerly known as New
PMSI, Inc. (the "Corporation"), hereby adopts this first amendment (this
"Amendment") to its 1993 stock option plan (the "Plan") effective for all
purposes as of June 18, 1997 (the "Effective Date").

                                R E C I T A L S

     WHEREAS, on October 12, 1993 the Corporation adopted the Plan, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit-A; and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.1 of the Plan, subject to certain
adjustments provided for in the Plan, the aggregate number of shares of the
Corporation's stock to be issued pursuant to the exercise of all options granted
under the plan may not exceed two million (2,000,000) shares; and

     WHEREAS, at the annual meeting of the Corporation's shareholders held on
the Effective Date, and in accordance with Section 9 of the Plan (relating to
amendments of the Plan), the shareholders of the Corporation approved an
amendment to the Plan, as contained herein, pursuant to which the aggregate
number of shares of stock that could be issued pursuant
<PAGE>

to the exercise of all options granted under the Plan would be increased by five
hundred thousand (500,000) shares.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of, and pursuant to, the foregoing, the
Corporation hereby adopts this Amendment to the Plan as follows:

     1.  Paragraph 2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

         2.1. Description of Stock and Maximum Shares Allocated. The Stock which
     Options granted hereunder give a Holder the right to purchase may be
     unissued or reacquired shares of Stock, as the Corporation may, in its sole
     and absolute discretion, from time to time determine.

     Subject to the adjustments provided for in Paragraph 6.7 hereof, the
     aggregate number of shares of Stock to be issued pursuant to the exercise
     of all Options granted hereunder may equal but shall not exceed 2,500,000
     shares of Stock.

     2.  Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

                                       2
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation, acting by and through its officer
hereunto duly authorized, has executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


                                             PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.


                                             By:/s/ Cheryl L. Williams
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Cheryl L. Williams
                                                Vice President - Finance

                                       3
Presidential Documents

30533 

Federal Register 

Vol. 86, No. 109 

Wednesday, June 9, 2021 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of June 4, 2021 

2020 Unified Command Plan 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

Pursuant to my authority as Commander in Chief, I hereby rescind direction 

dated January 13, 2021, to the Department of Defense to begin drafting 

Change 1 to the 2020 Unified Command Plan to reassign the responsibility 

for Greenland from United States European Command to United States Northern Command. 

Consistent with title 10, United States Code, section 161(b)(2) and title 

3, United States Code, section 301, you are directed to notify the Congress 

on my behalf. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 4, 2021 

[FR Doc. 2021–12221 

Filed 6–8–21; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 5001–06–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 23


                            CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-78300) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of E.W. Blanch
Holdings, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1997, except for Note 15, as to
which the date is February 21, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of E.W. Blanch Holdings, Inc. by reference in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                 /s/  Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of American Racing Capital, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:    August 31, 2006            By:    /s/D.  Davy Jones
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  D. Davy Jones
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Racing Capital,
Inc. and will be retained by American Racing Capital, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6964

DESI ARNEZ LEWIS,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00549-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Desi Arnez Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Desi Arnez Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as an 

unauthorized, successive petition or, in the alternative, as 

untimely.* The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

 * Because the petition was successive and unauthorized, the 

district court lacked jurisdiction to consider it. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2244(b) (2012); United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 205 

(4th Cir. 2003).
3

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Lewis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Frontier Beverage Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Anthony Peppers, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony Peppers


Anthony Peppers


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


May 12, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9232]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CO-933-95-1320-01; COC 56447]


Notice of Coal Lease Offering By Sealed Bid; COC 56447 Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the document, Notice of Competitive Coal Lease Sale at 60 
FR 18142 dated April 10, 1995, please make the following correction: T. 
13 S., R. 90 W., 6th P.M., sec. 11, lots 9 to 12, inclusive, and SW\1/
4\SE\1/4\; should read sec. 11, lots 9 to 12, inclusive, and SW\1/
4\SW\1/4\.

    Dated: April 10, 1995.
Karen A. Purvis,
Solid Minerals Team Resource Services.
[FR Doc. 95-9232 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-M
**EXHIBIT32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (this “Report”), I, Michael L. Pungello, Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 14, 2006                         |                     |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                          |                     |
| By                                            | /s/ MICHAEL L.  PUNGELLO |   |
| Michael L.  Pungello                          |
| Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer   |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                               |                          |  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
 (Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Geophysical Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, P. Mathew Verghese, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Dated: May 6, 2011

/s/ P. Mathew VergheseP. Mathew VergheseSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Report on
Form 10-Q of Foundation Coal Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2009, I, Frank J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of Foundation Coal Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | This Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Foundation Coal Corporation.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2009

/S/ FRANK J. WOODFrank J. WoodChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5554 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5554

       To prohibit the use of organophosphate pesticides on food.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2023

 Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Mr. Bowman, Ms. Meng, Ms. Schakowsky, and 
Ms. Barragan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To prohibit the use of organophosphate pesticides on food.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ban All Neurotoxic Organophosphate 
Pesticides From Our Food Act'' or the ``BAN OPs From Our Food Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ORGANOPHOSPHATES ON FOOD.

    Section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
342) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) If it bears or contains any organophosphate pesticide, 
including any residue of an organophosphate pesticide, or any other 
added substance the presence of which is primarily as a result of the 
metabolism or other degradation of an organophosphate pesticide, 
regardless of whether any tolerance or exemption with respect to 
organophosphate is in effect under section 408.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS










We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-150300, 333-155919, 333-158348 and 333-162431 on
Form S-8,of our report dated November 13, 2009,  which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the substaintial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rahaxi, Inc. (Formerly Freestar Technology Corporation) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2009.








/s/ RBSM LLP











New York, New York


November 13, 2009