alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.01**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)Certifications**

I, BenjaminWeston, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14, 2006                  |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |   |
| By                                     | /s/ BENJAMIN  WESTON |   |
| Benjamin Weston                        |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |
|                                        |  |  |  |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

STEVEN BURDA,

Petitioner

v.

ALLA KORENMAN A/K/A ALLA BURDA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 429 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 110 (Thursday, June 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 31004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, July 8, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 
317-3087.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 
2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Fred Smith. For more information please contact Fred Smith at 
1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at 
the website: http://www.improveirs.org.

    Dated: June 4, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-12118 Filed 6-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### James E. COX, Respondent, v. Chester W. TERHUNE, et al., Appellant.

No. WD 51104.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.

Decided March 12, 1996.

Ronald E. Johnson, Liberty, John W. Roe, Kansas City, for appellant.

Sherwin L. Epstein, Kansas City, Alan Dietchman, Liberty, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Chester and Louise Terhune appeal the judgment of the trial court denying relief on their claim of adverse possession as to land belonging to a neighbor, James Cox, on which a fence belonging to the Terhunes is *228located. The Terhunes claim that the trial court erred in denying their claim and in granting injunctive relief and damages for trespass to Mr. Cox. They claim, *inter alia,*that the trial court erred in considering as evidence the fact that Mr. Terhune formerly owned the property, and transferred the property by warranty deed.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Terrence CLARK, Plaintiff, v. SHONEY’S INC., d/b/a Lee’s Famous Recipe, Defendant-Respondent, and Three Sevens, Inc., d/b/a City Amoco, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 68873.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 7, 1996.

David M. Duree, Reinert & Duree, P.C., St. Louis, for Appellant.

Charles E. Reis, IV and Krissa P. Lubben, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Three Sevens, Inc., d/b/a City Amoco (Three Sevens), appeals the granting of a motion dismissing their cross-claim for contribution against Shoney’s, Inc. (Shoney’s). Three Sevens contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the cross-claim because Shoney’s owed a duty of care to Terrence Clark, plaintiff, in that it permitted a dangerous condition to exist on its premises and it was reasonably foreseeable that an unknown *169assailant would attack and injure those on or about its premises. AFFIRMED.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reason for our decision.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5848 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from 

directly making loans under the 7(a) loan program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, Mr. MEUSER, Ms. 

VAN DUYNE, Mr. BEAN of Florida, Mr. LALOTA, and Mr. ALFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small 

Business 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from directly making loans under the 7(a) loan 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON DIRECT 7(a) LOANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of 

5 subsection (a) of section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 636(a)), the Administrator of the Small Business 

7 Administration may not directly make a loan pursuant to 

8 such subsection. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5848 IH

1 (b) EXISTING LOANS.—The Administrator of the 

2 Small Business Administration shall service a direct loan 

3 made under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 636(b)) if such loan was made before the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Dental Patient Care America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Silva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| April 9, 2008 | /s/ Michael Silva |
|---------------|-------------------|

|   | Michael Silva |
|--------|---------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5528 

To evaluate the impact of the lowest price technically acceptable source 

selection process on national security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 

Mr. DONALDS (for himself and Mrs. BOEBERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To evaluate the impact of the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process on national security, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe and Smart Fed5 eral Purchasing Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EVALUATION OF IMPACT OF THE LOWEST PRICE 

7 TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE SOURCE SELEC8 TION PROCESS ON NATIONAL SECURITY. 

9 (a) EVALUATION.—The Director shall evaluate the 

10 procurement activities of each agency to determine whethVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:36 Sep 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5528.IH H5528

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5528 IH

1 er the provisions of section 15.101–2 of the Federal Acqui2 sition Regulation have created any national security risk. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the en4 actment of this Act, the Director shall submit a report 

5 on the results of the evaluation under subsection (a) to— 

6 (1) the Committee on Oversight and Account7 ability of the House of Representatives; and 

8 (2) the Committee on Homeland Security and 

9 Governmental Affairs of the Senate. 

10 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

11 (1) AGENCY.—The term ‘‘agency’’ has the 

12 meaning given that term in section 133 of title 41, 

13 United States Code. 

14 (2) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘‘Director’’ means 

15 the Director of the Office of Management and Budg16 et. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Anthony Coletti, Chief Accounting Officer of Trafalgar Resources, Inc. (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period June 30, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                   By: /s/ Anthony Coletti
                     -----------------------------------
                   Anthony Coletti
                   Chief Accounting Officer

August 10, 2007

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Trafalgar Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Trafalgar
Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1318
WILLIAM L. BARRETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-620-5-F) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 14, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William L. Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his medical malpractice claim filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 1994), and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barrett v. United States , No. CA-93-620-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 1995, Jan. 18, 1995, Feb. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James Charles, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ James Charles

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 16, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Green, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), rendered January 31, 1989, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress a written statement given by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We do not agree with the defendant’s contention that his written statement should have been suppressed pursuant to CPL 60.45 (2) (b) (i). The defendant agreed to accompany the investigating officer to police headquarters for questioning. The officer’s statement to the defendant that he would return him home after questioning, did not create a substantial risk that the defendant might falsely incriminate himself *(see, People v Taber,*115 AD2d 126), and in fact the defendant returned home after the questioning.

By pleading guilty, the defendant waived his right to challenge the court’s *Sandoval*ruling *(see, People v Marinelli,*148 AD2d 550).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### Cornell ATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 68382.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 12, 1996.

*303S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J. and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of Rule 24.035 relief without an evidentiary hearing. He is serving concurrent sentences on two drug convictions. The only claim of error is the record does not refute allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel where counsel failed to inform movant he would not be allowed to appeal denial of a pre-trial motion to suppress evidence.

We review in accord with Rule 24.035(j) and *Moore v. State,*827 S.W.2d 213, 215 (Mo. banc 1992). The record clearly and fully refutes movant’s allegation. The court asked movant if he understood, “By pleading guilty there will be no trial, there will be no appeal, and the rights about which I have just asked you will be given up by you. Do you understand that?” Movant acknowledged that he understood he was giving up those rights. The denial of relief is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Caldero, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), both rendered December 5, 1986, convicting him of at*546tempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 86-00711-01, and attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 86-00891-01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20708

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OLIVERIO VALENCIA-GARCIA, also known as Oliverio Garcia Valencia, also 

known as Oliverio Garza Valencia, also known as Oliverio Valencia Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-203-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oliverio Valencia-Garcia 

raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. MoralesMota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir. 2013), which rejected the argument that the 

Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader than the generic, 

contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-20708 Document: 00513079121 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-20708

2

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person 

with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” Accordingly, 

the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the 

district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-20708 Document: 00513079121 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly Report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  June 10, 2009 /s/Frank Pioppi     Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (this “Report”), I, Michael L. PungelloVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1.  This Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 15, 2006                           |                    |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                          |
| By                                            | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
| Michael L. Pungello                           |
| Vice President, Chief  Financial Officer      |
| and Treasurer                                 |
| (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer) |
|                                               |                         |  |  |

 

----