alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19944-19945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11071]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service


National Institutes of Health; Statement of Organization, 
Functions, and Delegations of Authority

    Part H, Chapter HN (National Institutes of Health) of the Statement 
of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the 
Department of Health and Human Services (40 FR 22859, May 27, 1975, as 
amended most recently at 61 FR 3722, February 1, 1996) is amended to 
reflect the reorganization of the Office of the Director, National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The 
reorganization consists of the following: (1) Abolish the Office of 
Grants and Contracts (HNT15) and transfer its functions to the Office 
of Administrative Management (OAM) (HNT12) and (2) revise the OAM 
functional statement. This reorganization improves the ability of the 
NICHD to fulfill its mission by restructuring the OD/NICHD and thereby 
improving the integration of related administrative and management 
areas and streamlining operations.
    Section HN-B, Organization and Functions is amended as follows:
    (1) Under the heading Office of Grants and Contracts (HNT15), 
delete the title and functional statement in their entirety.
    (2) Under the heading Office of Administrative Management (HNT12) 
revise the functional statement as follows:
    Office of Administrative Management (HNT12) (1) Advises the NICHD 
Director on administrative matters; (2) advises the Director and top 
staff on implications and impact of plans and programs from other 
Departmental levels and Federal agencies which affect budget, 
personnel, equal employment, grant, contract, information technology, 
or administrative services; (3) plans and directs financial, personnel, 
equal employment, grant, contract, information technology, and

[[Page 19945]]

administrative management functions of the Institute; and (4) develops 
and implements Institute-wide policies and procedures on administrative 
matters.

    Dated: April 23, 1996.
Harold Varmus,
Director, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-11071 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30222 Summary Calendar

LLOYD BALLIVIERO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GORDON K. KONRAD; LANA WERNER KONRAD; SHAWN M. KONRAD; BELLE CHASSE MARINE TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-2014-K

-------------------- January 7, 2003 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gordon K. Konrad, Lana Werner Konrad, Shawn M. Konrad, and Belle Chasse Marine Transportation, Inc., appeal the order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A) Lloyd Balliviero’s action without prejudice due to misrepresentations on his in forma pauperis affidavit. They argue that the dismissal should have been with prejudice.No. 02-30222 -2- After a hearing, the district court determined that the circumstances of Balliviero’s misrepresentations warranted a dismissal without prejudice. The defendants have not shown that the district court abused its discretion. See , e.g. , Lay v. Justices-Middle Dist. Court , 811 F.2d 285, 286 (5th Cir. 1987). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit B.1




Supplier Milestones










1.

Commence achieving Ex Works status for Towers.




2.

Commence shipping of Towers.




3.

Commence achieving Ex Works status for Blade Sets, Turbine Nacelles and Hubs.




4.

Commence shipping of Blade Sets, Turbine Nacelles and Hubs.




5.

Complete deliveries of Towers.




6.

Complete deliveries of Blade Sets, Turbine Nacelles and Hubs.




7.

Completion of Commissioning of Wind Turbines.




8.

SCADA Completion.




9.

Final Completion.







  

  

  Exhibit B.2

  

  

  Project Schedule

  

  

  			
	Project Milestone
	Responsible Party
	Completion Date

	Provide storage and laydown areas and access thereto at Project Site for Turbine Equipment and tools
	Buyer
	4 weeks prior to the first Anticipated Delivery Date

	Completion of site calibration for Power Curve Testing
	Buyer
	Prior to erection of first Tower

	Anticipated Delivery Dates

          Group 1: Qty. Nine (9) Wind Turbines and Towers

          Group 2: Qty. Nine (9) Wind Turbines and Towers
	Supplier
	

        

          Group 1:  Week of 8/27/07

          Group 2:  Week of 9/10/07

	Guaranteed Delivery Dates

          Group 1: Qty. Nine (9) Wind Turbines and Towers

          Group 2: Qty. Nine (9) Wind Turbines and Towers
	Supplier
	

        

          Group 1:  9/28/07

          Group 2:  10/12/07

	Permanent Grid Energization
	Buyer
	10/1/07

	Commence erection and installation of Wind Turbines
	Buyer
	Week of 10/1/07

	Complete installation of Fiber Optic Cable to Server
	Buyer
	On or before Mechanical Completion of the first Wind Turbine

	Mechanical Completion of Wind Turbines

          Group 1: Qty. Nine (9) Wind Turbines

          Group 2: Qty. Nine (9) Wind Turbines
	Buyer
	

        

          Group 1:  10/12/07

          Group 2:  10/26/07

	Commissioning Completion of Wind Turbines
	Supplier
	Seven (7) Business Days after Mechanical Completion of the relevant Wind Turbine, subject to Section 3.9 of the Agreement 

	Terminate SCADA fiber optic cables
	Supplier
	Not later than five (5) days after Commissioning Completion of the relevant Wind Turbine

	Connectivity of SCADA fiber optic cables
	Buyer
	Not later than five (5) days after Commissioning Completion of the relevant Wind Turbine or string of Wind Turbines required for connectivity

	SCADA Connectivity to Wind Turbine
	Supplier
	Not later than ten (10) days after Connectivity of SCADA fiber optic cables but conditioned on connectivity through other Wind Turbine on the string

	SCADA Completion
	Supplier
	45 days after Commissioning Completion of the last Wind Turbine 

	Final Completion
	Supplier
	60 days after Commissioning Completion of the last Wind Turbine

	Completion of Punchlist Items
	Supplier
	60 days after Final Completion
**Exhibit 10.5**

 

LEASE AMENDMENT NO. 1

 

WHEREAS,Boulder Station, Inc. (“Tenant”) and KB Enterprises (“Landlord”) haveentered in a Ground Lease and Sublease dated June 1, 1993 (the “Lease”);

 

WHEREAS,Landlord and Tenant agreed and intended asof such date that the appraised value of the lease be the higher of thefair market value of the land or the present value of lease payments;

 

WHEREAS,Landlord and Tenant received advice from Carlsmith, Ball, Wichman, Case &Ichiki that the lease language is not inconsistent with that intent; and

 

WHEREAS,in**connection with Landlord’saccommodating requests for asset transfers needed by****Tenant for its gaming license needs, Landlord expressed adesire to memorialize the intent by amending the Lease;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, the parties to the Lease agree to amend the Lease by adding asentence at the end of paragraph 1.2. in Article Ithereof as follows:

 

“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the market value of the Landlord’sinterest shall not be deemed to be lower than the present value of the incomestream remaining on the Lease.”

 

Byexecuting below, the parties agree to this Amendment No. 1 to the Leasethis 23rd dayof December, 1996.

 
|   | By:    | /s/  Glenn C. Christenson   |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Boulder  Station, Inc. |
|   |   |                        |
|   | By:    | /s/  W. J. Bullard          |   |
|   |   | KB  Enterprises             |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10880]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM96-13-29-001]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 26, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 23, 1996, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing certain revised tariff sheets 
to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1 which tariff sheets 
are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to 
supplement Transco's April 12, 1996, Tracker Filing in Docket No. TM96-
13-29-000 (April 12 Filing) in order to reflect the currently effective 
demand rates charged by Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) 
under its Rate Schedule FT, the cost of which are included in the rates 
and charges payable under Transco's Rate Schedule FT-NT. Transco's 
April 12 Filing eliminated Texas Gas' ISS Revenue Credit in error and 
therefore did not reflect the demand rates currently being charged by 
Texas Gas. In order to correct this, Transco is submitting substitute 
tariff sheets therein as replacements for the Rate Schedule FT-NT 
tariff sheets included in the April 12 Filing. This tracking filing is 
being made pursuant to Section 4 of Transco's Rate Schedule FT-NT.
    Transco also states that included in Appendix A attached to the 
filing are explanations of the rate changes and details regarding the 
computation of the revised Rate Schedule FT-NT.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its FT-NT customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10880 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brent M. Cook, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raser Technologies, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 12, 2006 |  | /s/ BRENT M. COOK                                                  
|                     |  | Brent M. Cook Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William Dwyer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raser
Technologies, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 12, 2006 |  | /s/ WILLIAM DWYER                                                                                    
|                     |  | William Dwyer Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)

A signed original of each of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Raser Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Raser Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 Certification

The
undersigned officers of Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify in their respective capacities that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K to which this
certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 16, 2005 |  | /s/CHARLES H. SHERWOOD, PH.D.Charles H. Sherwood, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/JAMES E. O'NEILLJames E. O'Neill
Treasurer                                  

This
certification shall not be deemed "filed" for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

---



QuickLinks
. 

. 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eon. Prmlk R. Hurry 

OOUnty Attorney 

Panhandle, Texar 

Dear Mr. Murray; 

- 

whether or not t 

to oonrtftutional lb4 

warrant8 against road 

de tax to oset tfme 

or oat they ret 

tax authorized 

ha8 boon modted 

adopted In 1890 

thorlee an mlditfonal 

.OO ot raluatlon ror 

roada. If toted by a 

ng eleotorr of the 

e held for that purpose, 

Y&f entlaal quo&ion was pXvmmted to thlr dopart- ‘mnt by t& rable Joe B. S&t&, Countr Auditor of Hunt 

adl the Eonorablb Soott Qaine@, krrtrtant Attornq Ceumral, 

County 

rrnderod an opinion on thir queetion Maroh llth, 193i?, a oopy 

of raid opinion befog 4n41064d herrwith. 

. 
: 

, _. 

Eon. hnk R. Muira7 

. ' 

January l&h, 1939 pw ia 

In+@ 'to your inquiry, ln tier of the foregoing 

authoritl.8, it is the opinion of this departmoat that where lag 

&litional road malntenams tax has been authorimd to be letied 

and oolleoted at an eleotlon oalled for that purpose br the 

ajorltr or the qyallfied voters of the oountr, the Cemissioners* 

Court ~7 fix a greatejr or less rate of 1~7 each JWU, not to 

l xoeed 134 on tie #lOO.OO vmrth oi taxable property. 

Trusting thit the roreeoing +wwers your inquir7, I am 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNlIYGENERALWTl3XAS 

By (Signed) ARDELL WILLIAMS 

Assistant . 

- 

AW:OB 

APPROVED: 

(Slgn,d) GRRALD 0. MARN 

Am- GENERU OF TEXAS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1095]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs 1996 Grant Program

    Though the 1996 budget is not complete, it seems prudent to begin a 
process which would allow the NCACA Program to be prepared if and when 
an appropriation is made. There is no guarantee that the program will 
be able to proceed, nor that funds will be available for grants. If 
your organization is interested in receiving an application package, 
however, please request one in writing.
    Questions can be referred to Don Myer on the Commission staff at 
202-504-2200.
Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1095 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
H. R. 5799 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located on United 

States Highway 90 West in Uvalde County, Texas, as the ‘‘James R. Dominguez 

Border Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘James R. Dominguez Memorial 

Act of 2023’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) A native of San Antonio, Texas, Border Patrol Agent 

James R. Dominguez— 

(A) proudly and honorably served his country as an 

agent of the U.S. Border Patrol for more than 12 years; 

(B) began his service with the U.S. Border Patrol in 

2000; and 

(C) graduated as part of the 434th session of the Border 

Patrol Academy. 

(2) Agent Dominguez served at the Uvalde Station in the 

Del Rio Sector. 

(3) On July 19, 2012, Agent Dominguez stopped to clear 

debris from the roadway that posed risks to road and community safety along Highway 90 near Cline, Texas. While on 

scene, Agent Dominguez was struck and killed by a passing 

vehicle. 

(4) Agent Dominguez is survived by his wife and 4 children. 

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

The checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located 

on United States Highway 90 West in Uvalde County, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘James R. Dominguez Border 

Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the checkpoint described 
H. R. 5799—2 

in section 3 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James 

R. Dominguez Border Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Terence Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic
Security, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Atlantic
Security, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: July 8, 2005

        By:     /s/ Terence Sullivan
           --------------------------------
		Terence Sullivan
		Principal Executive Officer, President and Chairman
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3330

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Heather Servantez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 10, 2007 Filed: August 23, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Heather Servantez appeals the 126-month prison terms the district court 1 imposed after she pleaded guilty to tw o drug offenses under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. For reversal, she argues that her sentence is unreasonable and the district court committed a clear error of judgment by sentencing her at the top of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, because the court gave undue weight to her criminal history without taking into account the petty nature of most of the offenses.-2- When the applicable Guide lines range is undisputed, as it is here, we consider whether the sentence is unreasonable in li ght of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220, 261-62 (2005). The presumption of reasonableness accorded a sentence within the Guidelines range, see Rita v. United States , 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007), may be re butted by showing that the district court failed to consider a factor that s hould have received significant weight, gave significant weight to an irrelevant fact or, or otherwise committed a clear error of judgment, see United States v. Davidson , 437 F.3d 737, 741 (8th Cir. 2006). The record supports that the district court properly considered only relevant factors, including Servantez’s extensive criminal hist ory and her role in the conspiracy, and did not commit a clear error of judgment in choosing a sentence at the top of the Guidelines range. Thus, we concludethat the sentence is not unreasonable. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________