alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           23861
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            6885
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     743064
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           64904
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             65372
<LOANS>                                         878996
<ALLOWANCE>                                       7530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1864176
<DEPOSITS>                                     1216874
<SHORT-TERM>                                    417672
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              21080
<LONG-TERM>                                      87005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      121472
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1864176
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  67729
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                47489
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  2691
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                117909
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               52258
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               76063
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            41846
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     2300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                1243
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   9552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  16623
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       16623
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.68
<LOANS-NON>                                       2861
<LOANS-PAST>                                       717
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  6202
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      999
<RECOVERIES>                                        27
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 7530
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              7530
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________ Nos. 15-1892 & 15- 2521

__ __ __ __ _____ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. YLLI GJELI, a/k/a Willie Ylli Gjeli, Appellant in No. 15-1892 FATMIR MUSTAFARAJ, a/k/a Tony Fatmir Mustafaraj, Appellant in No. 15-2521

_______________ On Ap peal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsy lvania (D.C. No. 2-13-c r-00421-0 0 1 and 0 0 2) District Judge: Hon. William H. Yohn, Jr.

_ ___________

___ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 12, 2017 Before: JORDAN, KRAUSE, Circuit Judges and STEARNS * , District Judge (Filed : August 11, 2017)

* Honorable Richard G. Stearns, United States District Court Judge for the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.2 _______________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION

_______________ JORDAN, Circuit Judge

. IT IS NOW ORDERED that the above captioned opinion be amended as follows: Page 2 of the Opinion, the name and addr ess of counsel, Eugene P. Tinari, shall be deleted. By the Court:

s/ Kent A. Jordan Circuit Judge Dated: August 23, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 111 (Friday, June 11, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31177-31178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12236]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 61

[Docket ID FEMA-2018-0026]
RIN 1660-AA95


National Flood Insurance Program: Conforming Changes To Reflect 
the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (BW-12) and the 
Homeowners Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (HFIAA), and 
Additional Clarifications for Plain Language; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 20, 2020, FEMA published in the Federal Register a 
final rule revising the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 
regulations to codify certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood 
Insurance Reform Act of 2012 and the Homeowner Flood Insurance 
Affordability Act of 2014, and to clarify certain existing NFIP rules 
relating to NFIP operations and the Standard Flood Insurance Policy. 
This final rule provides corrections to those instructions, to be used 
in lieu of the information published July 20.

DATES: This correction is effective October 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this rulemaking is available for inspection 
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and 
can be viewed by following that website's instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Bronowicz, Director, 
Policyholder Services Division, Federal Insurance and Mitigation 
Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 400 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 557-9488.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020-09260, beginning on page 
43946 in the Federal Register of Monday, July 20, 2020, the following 
corrections are made:

Appendix A(1) to Part 61 [Corrected]

0
1. On page 43968, in the second column, in appendix A(1) to part 61, 
the signatory ``Administrator, Federal Insurance and Mitigation 
Administration'' is corrected to read ``Federal Insurance and 
Mitigation Administration''.

[[Page 31178]]

Appendix A(2) to Part 61 [Corrected]

0
2. On page 43976, in the second column, in appendix A(2) to part 61, 
the signatory ``Administrator, Federal Insurance and Mitigation 
Administration'' is corrected to read ``Federal Insurance and 
Mitigation Administration''.

Appendix A(3) to Part 61 [Corrected]

0
3. On page 43985, in the first column, in appendix A(3) to part 61, the 
signatory ``Administrator, Federal Insurance and Mitigation 
Administration'' is corrected to read ``Federal Insurance and 
Mitigation Administration''.

Deanne B. Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-12236 Filed 6-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-52-P
Exhibit 99.5

Press Release

INTERPOOL COMPLETES $50 MILLION ASSET BACKED FINANCING TO FUND FLEET EXPANSION

PRINCETON, NJ, May 1, 2003 - Interpool, Inc. (NYSE:IPX)
announced that it completed $50 million of asset backed financing during April
of 2003. Proceeds from the transactions are earmarked for funding the expansion
of the Company's international and domestic container fleet.

According to Martin Tuchman, chairman and chief executive
officer of Interpool, "We continue to see improvements in the utilization
rates of our containers as well as chassis. We believe these improvements
reflect continued strong growth in imports. Through our client base, we are
uniquely positioned to spot trends in trade, and we are seeing signs of strength
in global trade which we feel bode well for our industry."

Tuchman said that as a matter of policy, the company does not
speculate on fleet expansions, but rather adds to capacity in response to new
long term leases. "This fleet expansion was consistent with our policy and
reflects new business we have been able to obtain through our market leadership,
competitive pricing and flexible lease structures."

Interpool is one of the world's leading suppliers of equipment
and services to the transportation industry. It is the largest lessor of
intermodal container chassis and a world-leading lessor of cargo containers used
in international trade. Interpool operates from over 240 locations throughout
the world.

This Press Release contains certain forward-looking statements
regarding future circumstances. These forward-looking statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those contemplated in such forward-looking statements, including in
particular the risks and uncertainties described in the company's SEC filings.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
hereof.

For Interpool Inc.
Contact
Mitchell Gordon
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(212) 916-3284
mgordon@interpool.com
**EXHIBIT
        23.1**
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        of
        AdZone Research, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-123883, 333-130145, 333-128340,
        333-141624 and 333-144358) of our report dated July 12, 2007 with respect
        to our
        audit of the financial statements of AdZone Research, Inc. as of March 31,
        2007,
        which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AdZone
        Research, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2007.
 
 */s/ Holtz Rubenstein Reminick
                LLP*
                Holtz
                  Rubenstein Reminick LLP
                Melville,
                  New York
                July
                  12, 2007
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILIBERTO BELLO SUAREZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-73143 

Agency No. A096-346-311 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 10, 2018**

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Filiberto Bello Suarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-73143 

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and 

dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Bello Suarez’s tenth motion 

to reopen as untimely and number-barred where the motion was filed more than 

nine years after the BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where he

failed to establish any of the regulatory exceptions to the time and number 

limitations for filing a motion to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3). In light of our 

disposition, we do not reach Bello Suarez’s remaining contentions regarding 

hardship.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen sua sponte 

where Bello Suarez fails to establish any legal or constitutional errors behind the 

decision. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court 

has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the 

limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or 

constitutional error.”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Bello Suarez’s contention that his case 

warrants a favorable exercise of prosecutorial discretion. See Vilchiz-Soto v. 

Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order).

To the extent Bello Suarez seeks review of the BIA’s December 2006 order, 

we lack jurisdiction because this petition is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. 
3 16-73143 

§ 1252(b)(1); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995).

We do not consider the extra-record evidence submitted with Bello Suarez’s 

opening brief. See Dent v. Holder, 627 F.3d 365, 371 (9th Cir. 2010) (stating 

standard for review of out-of-record evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2011 |  | /s/ Mark A. Sirgo                                   
|                     |  | Mark A. Sirgo, President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Willie J. TIMMONS, Appellant.

Nos. WD 49796, WD 51180.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 9, 1996.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jill C. LaHue, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVTR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Willie J. Timmons appeals his conviction of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986, and the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
#### In the Interest of K.B., Plaintiff. (Two Cases) JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. R.S.-Father, Appellant. (Two Cases)

Nos. WD 50315, WD 50316.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted July 18, 1995.

Decided Oct. 10, 1995.

Scott Carter, Asheville, N.C., for appellant.

Karen E. Snyder, Lori Stipp, Kansas City, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.

Amy Wyssman, Kansas City, Guardian Ad Litem.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

*366
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This action involves a proceeding for the termination of parental rights. R.S., who will remain incarcerated until at least 1999, appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights as to his two children, K.B. and K.B. He contends, *inter alia,*that the trial court erred because the court based its determination solely on the fact that he is incarcerated.

Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended February 28, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Placer Gold      Corp. |

| By:                | /s/      Peter J. Sterling                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Peter      J. SterlingPresident,      Principal Executive Officer, Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer,      Principal Accounting Officer and      a member of the Board ofDirectors |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134134 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134134 

 COA: 266082 

Wayne CC: 05-001206-01

JULIAN TIMOTHY BROOKS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Infrastructure Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: May 16, 2011





/s/   Li XipengName: Li XipengTitle: Chief Executive Officer, Principal

Executive Officer and Chairman of the

Board
Exhibit 10.1


 


First
Ottawa Bancshares Announces Dividend


 


Ottawa,
Ill., May 14, 2010 - The Board of Directors of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. (Pink Sheets: FOTB.PK)
approved the payment of a $0.54 per share semi annual cash dividend on the
Company’s common stock.


 


“We are very pleased to
make this distribution to our loyal shareholders”, said Jock Brown, President
and CEO.  “In exercising its discretion,
our board took into consideration our anticipated earnings, capital
requirements, and the current regulatory and economic environments, all in the
light of the new variable dividend policy adopted by our board in the fall of
2008.”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Basnight, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), rendered June 27, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Two days after the complainant was robbed and assaulted, an anonymous informant called the "Crime Stoppers” telephone number, stating that he had observed the attack. The anonymous informant provided the police with a description of one of the assailants, including the clothes that the perpetrator was currently wearing and information that he had a gold front tooth. Later that day, based on this information, the defendant was arrested and charged in the attack. Subsequently an accomplice was arrested *(see, People v Jones,*141 AD2d 667).

The complainant’s own account of the attack, including his description of one of his assailants, corroborated the physical description of the assailant provided by the anonymous informant. Additionally corroborated by the complainant’s account were details concerning the date and location of the incident. Under such circumstances, the reliability of the informant was sufficiently established to provide the police with probable cause to arrest the defendant, based on the informant’s personal observation of the attack *(see, People v Bigelow,*66 NY2d 417, 423-424; *People v Johnson,*66 NY2d 398, 403; *People v Rodriguez,*52 NY2d 483, 489; *People v Elwell,*50 NY2d 231, 237; *People v Harris,*146 AD2d 801). Accordingly, *457the hearing court did not err when it declined to suppress testimony concerning the complainant’s identification of the defendant in a lineup conducted after the defendant’s arrest *(cf., People v Dodt,*61 NY2d 408).

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 86; *People v Roman,*84 AD2d 851).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual  Report of Dental  Patient Care America,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Brad Berrett,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brad Berrett
----------------
Chief Financial Officer
June 27, 2005
#### Tony RICE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1218-89.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Nov. 22, 1989.

On appellant’s petition for discretionary review: petition granted and cause remanded to the Court of Appeals.