alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5548 

To provide for interim appropriations for the District of Columbia courts 

and related agencies with respect to any fiscal year for which appropriations are not otherwise provided for such courts and agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To provide for interim appropriations for the District of 

Columbia courts and related agencies with respect to 

any fiscal year for which appropriations are not otherwise 

provided for such courts and agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTERIM APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISTRICT OF 

4 COLUMBIA COURTS AND RELATED AGENCIES. 

5 (a) AVAILABILITY OF INTERIM APPROPRIATIONS.— 

6 If during any fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2023) 

7 there is an appropriation made for a Federal payment de8 scribed in subsection (c), and during the next fiscal year 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5548 IH

1 there is no appropriation made for such a payment, there 

2 shall be appropriated for such next fiscal year, out of any 

3 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such 

4 sums as are necessary for such payment, at a rate for op5 erations and under the terms and conditions provided in 

6 the previous fiscal year. 

7 (b) EFFECT OF ENACTMENT OF SUBSEQUENT AP8 PROPRIATIONS.—If an appropriation for a Federal pay9 ment described in subsection (c), or a general appropria10 tion bill providing appropriations for Federal funds for the 

11 District of Columbia without provision for such a pay12 ment, is enacted into law on any date during a fiscal year 

13 following the expenditure of funds during such fiscal year 

14 pursuant to this Act— 

15 (1) such expenditure shall be charged to such 

16 appropriation (if any); and 

17 (2) appropriations made available pursuant to 

18 this Act shall not be available after the date of en19 actment of such appropriation or general appropria20 tion bill. 

21 (c) FEDERAL PAYMENTS DESCRIBED.—The Federal 

22 payments described in this subsection are as follows, as 

23 provided in the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 

24 2023 (title IV of division E of Public Law 117–328): 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5548 IH

1 (1) A Federal payment to the District of Co2 lumbia Courts. 

3 (2) A Federal payment for defender services in 

4 District of Columbia courts. 

5 (3) A Federal payment to the Court Services 

6 and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of 

7 Columbia. 

8 (4) A Federal payment to the District of Co9 lumbia Public Defender Service. 

10 (5) A Federal payment to the Criminal Justice 

11 Coordinating Council. 

12 (6) A Federal payment for judicial commis13 sions. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of OC Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
W. Hughes, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



Date:  March 25, 2005

/s/ Robert W. Hughes
--------------------
Robert W. Hughes
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       20
EXHIBIT NUMBER 4.53



                   AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                            KGE MANAGEMENT LTD. AND
                              IMA EXPLORATION INC.
                             DATED OCTOBER 3, 2002
































                                                                             143
<PAGE>




IMA EXPLORATION INC.




October 3, 2002



Dr. Gerald G. Carlson
Cooper Ridge Explorations Inc.
500 - 625 Howe St.
Vancouver, BC V6C 2T6



Dear Gerry:

Further to our agreement now in force,  which expires  October 10, 2002, I would
like to propose the following revision:

Fees to be reduced to $2,000 per month or an equivalent of 4 days per month. Any
time put in additionally to be paid at the rate of $550 per day.

Out of country or town to be paid at the rate of $600 per day plus all  expenses
paid based on an approved budget.

You retain your option forward to stay in force until 2006.

Sincerely,

IMA EXPLORATION INC.

/s/ Joseph Grosso

Joseph Grosso
President

                                      /s/ Gerald G. Carlson            9-Oct-02
                                      ---------------------            --------
                                      Gerald G. Carlson                Date





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Terminal City Club Tower, Suite709-837 West Hastings Street,
                         Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3N6
          Tel: 604.687.1828 Fax: 604.687.1858 Toll Free: 800.901.0058
        www.imaexploration.com E-Mail: info@imaexploration.com TSX-V: IMR


                                                                             144
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2338** 

In re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.

Submitted : March 14, 2017 Decided: March 16, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Daniel Johnson Willis, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Johnson Willis petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to rule on all of Willis’s actions filed between 2013 and 2016. We note that this court and the district court have prefiling injunctions in place related to civ il actions filed by Petitioner Willis . We conclude that Willis is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U
. S
. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United Stat es v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)

. Willis has not demonstra ted that the district court has abused its discretion in denying leave to file Willis’s actions. Further, Willis has routinely appealed these determinations by the district court. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Marti n Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Willis is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Willis’s motion for leave to amend his petition, we deny the petition and supplemental petition for writ of manda mus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROGER WILLIAMSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 128 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 10.13


 


Martin Minnaugh


Virginia Power Energy Marketing, Inc.


120 Tredegar Street


Richmond, Virginia 23219


 


	
  Re: Letter of Agreement

  	
   

  	
  July 11,
  2006    

  



 


Dear Martin:


 


This confirms the agreement of Virginia Power Energy Marketing, Inc. (“VPEM”)
and MxEnergy Inc. (“MXenergy”)  with
respect to the amendment and restatement of the Amended and Restated Energy
Marketing Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2005. Specifically:


 


All forward physical and financial transactions between VPEM and
MXenergy will be novated to Societe Generale (“SG”) upon completion of and ISDA
Master Agreement between SG and VPEM, with such novation (the “Novation”) to
take place prior to September 1, 2006.


 


During the period from the date of this Letter of Agreement until the
Novation, MXenergy shall post dollar for dollar margin in the amount of any
negative marked to market amount. If the Novation is not completed by September
1, 2006 as a result of the failure of VPEM to behave in a commercially
reasonable manner, the margining reflected above will not be required.


 


MXenergy and VPEM shall amend the current ISDA Agreement & Schedule
to include margining provisions referenced in the prior bullet.


 


MXenergy will post commercially acceptable forms of credit support in
accordance with normal counterparty business arrangements for actual account
receivable exposure, but for no greater than 60 days of actual account
receivable exposure.


 


VPEM will evaluate, per VPEM’s credit policies, an open account status
for MXenergy to purchase physical gas.


 


Subject to the above items, MXenergy will purchase its physical natural
gas requirements from VPEM in the LDC territories set forth on Exhibit 6 of the
EMA, including without limitation the $0.04 adder set forth in Exhibit 8.


 


The parties do not otherwise waive any rights under the EMA and will
incorporate the provisions of this Letter of Agreement into an amended and
restated Energy Marketing Agreement no later than July 12, 2006.


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/ Carole R. Artman-Hodge

  	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Carole R. Artman-Hodge

  
	
  Executive Vice-Presdent

  
	
    and Chief Operating Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6141

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLAY JO MCCAULEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cr-00198-WO-1)

Submitted: July 9, 2021 Decided: July 28, 2021

Before KING, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clay Jo McCauley, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clay Jo McCauley appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for a 

reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

McCauley, No. 1:10-cr-00198-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2019, & Feb. 10, 2020). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 88 (Monday, May 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11216]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Importation of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1008 of the Controlled Substances Import and 
Export Act (21 U.S.C. 958(i)), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in Schedule I or II and prior to issuing a 
regulation under Section 1002(a) authorizing the importation of such a 
substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk 
manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Section 1311.42 of Title 21, Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR), notice is hereby given that on March 14, 
1996, Roberts Laboratories, Inc., 4 Industrial Way West, Eatontown, New 
Jersey 07724, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
to be registered as an importer of propiram (9649) a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule I.
    The firm plans to import the propiram to manufacture in bulk for 
product development.
    Any manufacturer holding, or applying for, registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of this basic class of controlled substance may file 
written comments on or objections to the application described above 
and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such 
application in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.54 in such form as 
prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections, or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, 
Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United 
States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA 
Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than 
(30 days from publication).
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with and 
independent of the procedures described in 21 CFR 1311.42 (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice at 40 FR 43745-46 
(September 23, 1975), all applicants for registration to import a basic 
class of any controlled substance in Schedule I or II are and will 
continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 
21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1311.42 (a), (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-11216 Filed 5-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```
Exhibit 99.2





|                          
|--------------------------
|2008 Results of Operations





BlastGard International Reports

2008 Year-End Results



CLEARWATER FL, April 14, 2008 - BlastGard International (OTCBB; BLGA) reported financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008.



For the year ended December 31, 2008, BlastGard International reported revenues of $732,044 compared to $408,988 for the year ended December 31, 2007. Revenues are primarily attributable to the commercialization and sale of BlastWrap® and BlastWrap®-associated products.  BlastGard International reported a net loss of $1,493,945 or $(0.04) per share based on the weighted average of 40,714,954 shares outstanding for the year-ended December 31, 2008. In comparison, for the year-ended December 31, 2007, the Company reported a net loss of $3,827,188 or $(0.12) per share based on the weighted average of 32,655,112 shares outstanding.



About BlastGard International, Inc.



BlastGard International, Inc. creates designs, develops, manufactures and markets proprietary blast mitigation materials. The Company's patent-pending BlastWrap® technology effectively mitigates blast effects and suppresses post-blast fires. This unique technology is being used to create new, finished products or to retrofit to existing products. BlastWrap® is a market leading product from which blast protection solutions are built to save lives and reduce damage to valuable assets from explosions. Additional information on BlastGard can be found at http://www.blastgardintl.com.



``Safe Harbor'' statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Except for historical information, all of the statements, expectations and assumptions contained in the foregoing are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. It is possible that the assumptions made by management are not necessarily the most likely and may not materialize. In addition, other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following: the Company's ability to market its products; the Company's ability to obtain additional funding; the Company's ability to obtain regulatory approvals on new products, the general economy; competitive factors; ability to attract and retain personnel; the price of the Company's stock; and other risk factors. The Company takes no obligation to update or correct forward-looking statements.



Company Contact:

BlastGard International, Inc.

Michael J. Gordon

(727) 592-9400
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AC QU E S GA R AB E T MAKS OU DI AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 72059 A ge nc yN o. A 094- 211- 943 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y19, 2010 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , R E IN H A R D T , an dW A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a c que s G ar abe tM a ks oudi an, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of L e banon, pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , O rdo n ezv . I NS , 

# FI LED JU L 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 72059 2 345 F . 3d 777, 782 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd w e de nyi n parta nd gr anti n partthe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g M ak s o u d ian ’s m o tio n to re op en t o app l y f

or as ylum and w i thh ol di ng because i tw as un t i m el y and nu m berb a rr e d , se e 8 C . F . R . §§ 10 03 . 2(c) (2), and M aksoud i an fa i l ed t o est abl i sh changed c o u n tryc o n d i t i o n s i n Le b an o n t o q u a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l a t o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me a n dn u m b e rlim ita tio n s , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; s e e a ls o M a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft , 38 1 F . 3d 94 2, 94 5 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( “ T he cr i t i ca l qu es t i on i s . . . w hether c i r c um s t a nc e s ha ve c hange d s uf f i c i e nt l ytha tape t i t i one rw ho pr e vi ous l ydi d not have a l egi t i m at e c l ai m for a sy l um no w has aw el l -f ou nd ed fe arof future pers ec ut i on . ”) . B e c aus e the B I A f

a i l e d t o a ddr e s s M a ks oudi an’ s C A T c l a i m i n de ny i ng the m o tio n to r e o p e n , w e r e m an df o rth e B I A to d e te rm in e if r e o p e n in g is w arr an te d . See Sag ayda k v . G on zales , 405 F . 3d 1035, 1040 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( “ T he B I A [ i s ] not fr ee t o i gn ore argum ent s r ai se d b y apet i t i on er . ”) . E a c h p artys h a l l b e ari t s o wn c o s t s f o rth i s p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; G R A N T E D i n p art; RE MAND E D.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5372

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  BioForce  Nanosciences
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Eric Henderson,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/S/   ERIC HENDERSON
-------------------------------
Eric Henderson
Principal Accounting Officer
November 17, 2006



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
         this  written  statement  has been  provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing  certifications are
         accompanying  the Company's Form 10-QSB solely  pursuant to section 906
         of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350,  chapter  63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.