alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ernest WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 64822.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 21, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 11, 1994.

Deborah B. Wafer, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Darl C. McBrideDarl C. McBridePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    January 29, 2009
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00477-CR

Style: Sergio Gordillo

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: January 7, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 27, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested: Reasonable time after filing of hearing record

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 5, 2014

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

On January 6, 2014, a reporter’s record of the April 8, 2013 hearing on motion for continuance was filed with this

Court. Accordingly, appellant’s brief is due to be filed on or before February 5, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.1, 38.6(a).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Jim Sharp

 Acting for the Court 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: January 16, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9780]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32686]


Union County Industrial Railroad Company--Acquisition and 
Operation Exemption--Consolidated Rail Corporation

    Union County Industrial Railroad Company (Union), a noncarrier, has 
filed a verified notice under 49 CFR Part 1150, Subpart D--Exempt 
Transactions to acquire and operate a 3.9-mile rail line, owned by 
Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), between milepost 169.7, at or 
near New Columbia, and milepost 173.6, at or near Milton, in Union 
County, PA. The transaction was consummated April 4, 1995.
    This proceeding is related to Richard D. Robey--Continuance in 
Control Exemption--Union County Industrial Railroad Company, Finance 
Docket No. 32686 (Sub-No. 1), wherein Richard D. Robey has concurrently 
filed a petition for exemption to continue to control Union upon its 
becoming a rail carrier.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to reopen will not stay the exemption's 
effectiveness. An original and 10 copies of all pleadings must be filed 
with the Commission. In addition, one copy must be served on Richard R. 
Wilson, Vuono, Lavelle & Gray, 2310 Grant Building, Pittsburgh, PA 
15219.

    Decided: April 14, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9780 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 273-274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-105]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

48 CFR Parts 1215, 1252, and 1253

RIN 2105-AC-32


Revision of Department of Transportation Acquisition Regulation

AGENCY: Transportation.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 274]]


SUMMARY: This final rule completes the rulemaking necessary to issue 
revisions to the Transportation Acquisition Regulation (TAR) which were 
published in the November 3, 1995 Federal Register (60 FR 55801) as an 
interim final rule with a request for comments.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine Wheeler, Office of Acquisition 
and Grant Management, M-61, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20590: (202) 366-4272.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    On November 3, 1995, revisions to the TAR were published in the 
Federal Register (60 FR 55801) as an interim final rule. Comments were 
solicited from interested parties, including the public and other 
Federal agencies and none were received. The interim final rule 
established a public comment period which closed on December 4, 1995. 
This notice finalizes that rulemaking.

B. Regulatory Analyses and Notices

    The Department has determined that this action will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
because the basic policies remain unchanged and only editorial 
corrections or administrative changes are being made.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to 
the TAR do not impose additional record keeping information collection 
requirements, or additional collections of information from offerors, 
contractors, or members of the public which require the approval of the 
Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1215, 1252, and 1253

    Government procurement.

    The interim final rule amending 12 CFR parts 1215, 1252, and 1253 
which was published at 60 FR 55801 on November 3, 1995, is adopted as a 
final rule without change.
    This final rule is issued under delegated authority under 49 CFR 
part 1.59(q). This authority has been redelegated to the Senior 
Procurement Executive.

    Issued this 22nd day of December 1995, at Washington, DC.
David J. Litman,
Senior Procurement Executive.
[FR Doc. 96-105 Filed 1-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
SYNTHENOL INC.








/s/
      Cecil Morris
            
            Date:
      March 28, 2008Cecil
      Morris
              Director,
      President / Secretary






-39-
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with the BlastGard International, Inc. (the “registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Michael J. Gordon, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.







Date: April 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Michael J. GordonMichael J. GordonPrincipal Executive and Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19102-19103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9229]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Notice of Request for a New Clearance of Survey Form ``How Do You 
Rate Your Health Plan?''

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (title 
44, U.S. Code, chapter 35), this notice announces a request for 
clearance of a new information collection. The survey form, How Do You 
Rate Your Health Plan (Fee-For-Service or HMO version) is used to 
determine how enrollees rate the services they receive from their FEHB 
health plan. The survey results will benefit the Office of Personnel 
Management, participating FEHB health plans and FEHB enrollees and will 
be published in Form RI 70-13, 1995 Federal Employees Health Benefits 
(FEHB) Plans Consumer Satisfaction Survey. Approximately 40,000 survey 
forms will be completed annually by annuitants. We estimate it takes 25 
minutes to complete. The total burden is 16,667 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Doris R. Benz on (703) 980-
8564.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before May 
15, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Kenneth H. Glass, Chief, Insurance Operations Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW., Room 3415, Washington, DC 20415
    and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT:
Mary Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-4025.

[[Page 19103]] U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 95-9229 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
#### Delores C. FAGERBERG, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Charles E. FAGERBERG, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 69166.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Oct. 15, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 18,1996.

Harold G. Johnson, Mitchell D. Johnson, St. Ann, for respondent/appellant.

Joseph A. Rathert, Fenton, for petitioner/respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

In this dissolution case, the trial court awarded wife $700 per month maintenance. Husband appeals; we affirm.

Husband raises two points. He alleges the trial court erred in: (1) granting maintenance to wife contrary to § 452.335.1, RSMol994, because she is in good health and able to support herself, and (2) granting maintenance to wife contrary to § 452.335.2 because husband is disabled and, with the maintenance payment, is unable to meet his own needs.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)0.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 19153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9553]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President  
[[Page 19153]] 
                Memorandum of April 4, 1995

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 106 of the 
                International Narcotics Control Corrections Act of 1994 
                (Public Law 103-447)

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and 
                laws of the United States of America, including section 
                301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I hereby 
                delegate to the Secretary of State the functions 
                conferred upon the President by section 106 of the 
                International Narcotics Control Corrections Act of 1994 
                (the ``Act'') (Public Law 103-447) with respect to 
                funds made available from any source.

                The functions delegated by this memorandum may be 
                redelegated to the extent permitted by law.

                This delegation of authority shall also apply to any 
                amendments or successor legislation concerning the 
                subject matter of this section.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 4, 1995.

[FR Doc. 95-9553
Filed 4-13-95; 3:23 pm]
Billing code 4710-10-M
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Iqbal Akhtar v. Leawood HOA, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00694-CV

Trial court case number: 1053689

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellant’s Motion for En Banc Review is denied.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: February 2, 2017

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE


SJI Board of Directors Meeting

AGENCY: State Justice Institute.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SJI Board of Directors will be meeting on Monday, June 21, 
2021 at 2 p.m. ET. The purpose of this meeting is to consider grant 
applications for the 3rd quarter of FY 2021, and other business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Mattiello, Executive 
Director, State Justice Institute, 12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340, 
Fairfax, VA 22033, 703-660-4979, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5c50514b5e5c4b7f4c555611585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f2c20213b2e2c3b0f3c252661282039">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jonathan D. Mattiello,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2021-12015 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-SC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40210 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KELVIN JERALE COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CR-52-1

- - - - - - - - - - November 3, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kelvin Jerale Coleman appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute. Coleman argues that the district court’s determination that he possessed a firearm during the commission of the offense is clearly erroneous. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find no error and AFFIRM. See United States v. Ramos , 71 F.3d 1150, 1157-58 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Edwards , 65 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10713]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-213-000]


High Island Offshore System; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 25, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 22, 1996, High Island Offshore System 
(HIOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
May 1, 1996:

Second Revised Sheet No. 1
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 9
Second Revised Sheet No. 69
Second Revised Sheet No. 69A
Second Revised Sheet No. 70

    HIOS asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's October 12, 1993, letter order in the captioned 
proceeding, High Island Offshore System, 65 FERC para. 61,053 (1993), 
that approved HIOS' line pack settlement. In addition, take notice that 
HIOS also filed in compliance with the Commission letter order, Final 
Reports of line pack surcharge collections and payments which reflect 
the completion of the line pack cost recovery and disbursement process 
as of April 17, 1996.
    HIOS states that the purpose of these filings is to reflect the 
completion of the line pack recovery and disbursement process 
contemplated by its approved line pack settlement, and the removal of 
the line pack commodity surcharge provisions that were contained in 
Section 15 of the General Terms and Conditions and related provisions 
of HIOS' tariff in light of such completed process.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motion or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10713 Filed 4-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Revision to the Coordinating Center for Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet (U01 Clinical Trial Required).                    

*Date:*                         July 15, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy                               ( print page 30611)                            Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ann A. Jerkins, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7119, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 301-594-2242,                         *jerkinsa@niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 3, 2021.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-12033 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P