alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 61917.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 12, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 10, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied May 25, 1993.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Saleeby, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.

A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have prepared a written memorandum for the use of the parties in this case only.

Affirmed per Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10339]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Engineers
Corps of Engineers


Available Surplus Real Property at the Military Ocean Terminal 
Bayonne (MOTBY), Located in Bayonne, Hudson County, New Jersey

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies the surplus real property located at 
MOTBY, located in Bayonne, New Jersey. MOTBY is located approximately 
two (2) miles from the New Jersey Turnpike (I-95) Exit 14A.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This surplus property is available under the 
provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 
1949 and the Base Closure Community Redevelopment and Homeless 
Assistance Act of 1994. Notices of interest should be forwarded to COL. 
Terry Teele (USA Ret.), Bldg. 91A, Military Ocean Terminal Bayonne, 
Bayonne, New Jersey 07002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information regarding particular properties identified in 
this Notice (i.e., acreage, floor plans, existing sanitary facilities, 
exact street address), contact Mr. Randy Williams, Army Corps of 
Engineers, 26 Federal Plaza, Room 2007, New York, NY 10278-0090 
(telephone 212-264-6122, fax 212-264-0230); or Ms. Patricia Gannon, 
Military Traffic Management Command, HQ, US Army Garrison Bayonne, 
Directorate of Public Works, Building 101/2, ATTN: MTEGB-PWR, Real 
Property Office, Bayonne, New Jersey 07002 (telephone 201-823-7025).
    The Surplus real property at MOTBY totals 660.40 acres of land in 
fee, improved with seven (7) office buildings, twenty (21) storage 
buildings, four (4) family housing structures consisting of 
approximately 300 units, a theater, hotel, restaurant, bank, bowling 
alley, gas station and post exchange.
Jay B. Hecth,
Chief, Real Estate Division.
[FR Doc. 96-10339 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-06-M
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|----------------------------------------
|AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER        
|PURSUANT TO                             
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                  

The undersigned, David Johnson, the Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer of Park Place Energy Corp., hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Park Place Energy Corp., for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Park Place Energy Corp.

Date: August 12, 2008.

|/s/ "David
      Johnson"    | 
|---------------------------- | 
|David Johnson                | 
|Chief Executive Officer and  | 
|Principal Accounting Officer | 

---
Exhibit 23.2  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in EarthLink, Inc.s Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30024, 333-34810, 333-39456, 333-96553,
333-108065, 333-126004, 333-133870, 333-133871), Form S-3
(Nos. 333-59456, 333-48100, 333-138600) and Form S-4 (No. 333-131541),
and in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated February 26, 2008,
with respect to the combined financial statements of HELIO, Inc. and affiliate
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008.  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP   Los Angeles, California February 27, 2009
#### In the Interest of M.S.M. and H.M.M., Minor Children. JUVENILE OFFICER OF JACKSON COUNTY, Missouri, Respondent, v. V.B., Natural Mother, Appellant.

No. WD 47183.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 27, 1993.

Kevin R. Thomas, Independence, for appellant.

Lori L. Stipp, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and SPINDEN and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated appeal by natural mother from orders terminating parental rights pursuant to § 211.447, RSMo Supp.1992.

The orders are affirmed, Rule 84.16(b); counsel’s motion for attorney fees for perfecting appeal is remanded to the trial court, *In Interest of Y.M.H.,*817 S.W.2d 279, 287 (Mo.App.1991).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Martin Tuchman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Interpool, Inc. (the
"Company"), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby
certify as follows:

|1. | The report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Interpool, Inc. and will be
retained by Interpool, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 16th
day of August, 2004.

| | /s/ Martin Tuchman
          Martin Tuchman
          Chairman of the Board, Chief
          Executive Officer, President,
          Chief Operating Officer and Director
          (Principal Executive Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Martin Tuchman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Interpool, Inc. (the
"Company"), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby
certify as follows:

|(1) | The report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification
this 28th day of March, 2005.

| | /s/ Martin Tuchman
Martin Tuchman
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer, President,
Chief Operating Officer and Director
OPrincipal Executive Officer)
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Interpool, Inc. and will be retained by
Interpool, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00032-CR

Sebastian GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4903

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On February 13, 2018, appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file a 

notice of appeal. In his motion, appellant states he is appealing the trial court’s judgment 

revoking his community supervision, and he failed to timely file a notice of appeal or motion for 

new trial. 

Rule 26.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that a notice of appeal 

must be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed or within 90 days after the day 

sentence is imposed if the defendant timely filed a motion for new trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2. A 

motion for new trial is timely filed if the defendant files the motion before, but no later than 30 

days after, the date when the trial court imposes sentence. Id. R. 21.4. If the filing of a notice of 

appeal or motion for new trial is by mail, then it is considered timely filed if the document is 

received within ten days after the filing deadline so long as it was: (1) sent to the proper clerk by 

the United States Postal Service; (2) placed in an envelope properly addressed and stamped; and 

(3) deposited in the mail on or before the last day of filing. Id. R. 9.2. 

A review of the clerk’s record reflects that sentence was imposed on December 12, 2017. 

The record does not contain a motion for new trial; therefore, the notice of appeal was due on or 

before January 11, 2018. See id. R. 26.2. The clerk’s record further demonstrates that a pro se 

notice of appeal was filed in our court on January 17, 2018, which was within ten days after the 

filing deadline. Moreover, the clerk’s record indicates that the envelope containing the notice of 

appeal was sent to the proper clerk, properly addressed to our court, and deposited in the mail on 
January 11, 2018, the last day of filing. See id. R. 9.2; see also id. R. 25.2 (providing if notice of 

appeal is received by court of appeals, clerk of court shall immediately record date notice was 

received and send notice to trial court clerk). Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal is deemed 

timely. 

Based on the foregoing, we DENY appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a 

notice of appeal as MOOT.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Order entered March 17 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00596
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00597
- CR
MICKEY ODELL GERALD II, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F07
- 72503
- V , F07
- 72502
- V



### O RDER We note that these cases involve appellant’s conviction for sexual assault of a child and deferred adjudication community supervision for aggravated sexual assault of a child. Appellan t’s briefs identify the child by her full name. Accordingly, we STRIKE appellant’s briefs and order them redrawn to use only the child’s initials. We ORDER appellant to file his amended briefs within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Allan Fishburn and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Exhibit 13.1



ASAT Holdings Limited

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, Harry R. Rozakis, the Chief Executive Officer of ASAT Holdings Limited (the Company), does hereby certify as follows:



To the best of my knowledge, the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for year ended April 30, 2005 accompanying this Certification, in the form
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 2, 2005



/s/    HARRY R.
ROZAKISName:

Harry R. RozakisTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




The certification set forth
above is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and should not be deemed to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Company or the certifying officers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         391
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,230
<OTHER-SE>                                     (89)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,141
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,222)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)



</TABLE>
Abatement Order filed April 17 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00 084

- CV

____________ KEN BIGHAM AND TRACY HOLLISTER , Appellant s

V.
SOUTHEAST TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, L.L.C., REGOR PROPERTIES, L.L.C., KORDEL, INC., AND JEFFREY PITSENBARGER , Appellee s

&

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00116

- CV

____________ SOUTHEAST TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, L.L.C., REGOR PROPERTIES, L.L.C., KORDEL, INC., AND JEFFREY PITSENBARGER , Appellant s

V.

KEN BIGHAM AND TRACY HOLLISTER , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007

- 550202 

### A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

This court has been notified that appellee/cross

- appellant, Jeffrey Pitsenbarger , has petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, under cause number 12

- 32287 . Because a stay is automatically effected by Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, we have stayed all proceed ings in the se appeal s

. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.
For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, this court
orders the cause s abated and treated as closed case s

. They may be reinstated on motion of any party, showing the stay has been lifted and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this court
, or the c ourt may reinstate the se appeal s on its own motion

. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3.

PER CURIAM
#### Jerry CREW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 61246.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 8, 1992.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 21, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 23, 1993.

*621David C. Hemingway, Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant/respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 24.035 motion on the merits following an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the 10KSB of Aucxis Corp. (the Company)
  for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis Petke, Chief
  Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and                   
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 14, 2004 | By: | /s/ Dennis Petke       
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                     |     | Dennis Petke           
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8411]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Summary Notice No. PE-94-14]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received; 
Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions 
of prior petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption (14 
CFR Part 11), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions 
seeking relief from specified requirements of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), dispositions of certain petitions 
previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to 
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of 
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Commens on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before April 21, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal 
Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rules 
Docket (AGC-200), Petition Docket No. 28179, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final 
disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are 
available for examination in the Rules Docket (AGC-200), Room 915G, FAA 
Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone (202) 267-7470.
    This notice is published pursuant to paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) 
of Sec. 11.27 of Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
Part 11).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 31, 1995.
Donald B. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: 8179.
    Petitioner: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Washington 
Flight Program (Hangar 6).
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.251 and 135.255(a).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit all Federal 
Aviation Administration Washington Flight Program (Hangar 6) 
management, pilot, and maintenance personnel, already included in the 
Department of Transportation (DOT) internal drug and alcohol testing 
program (DOT Order 3910.1C), to utilize that program (The Drug and 
Alcohol-Free Departmental Workplace) in lieu of these sections.

[FR Doc. 95-8411 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7292

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

WAYNE LEE PRICE, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, 

District Judge. (5:03-cr-70006-sgw) 

Submitted: January 7, 2009 Decided: January 13, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Wayne Lee Price, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Wayne Lee Price appeals the district court’s order 

denying Price’s motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Price, No. 5:03-

cr-70006-sgw (W.D. Va. June 19 & July 14, 2008). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED