alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10416]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Line Release Regulations

AGENCY: U.S. Customs, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and 
respondent burden, Customs invites the general public and other Federal 
agencies to comment on an information collection requirement concerning 
the Line Release Regulations. This request for comment is being made 
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13; 44 
U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)).

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 25, 1996, 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to U.S. Customs Service, 
Printing and Records Services Group, Room 6216, 1301 Constitution Ave., 
NW, Washington, D.C. 20229.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form(s) and instructions should be directed to U.S. 
Customs Service, Attn.: J. Edgar Nichols, Room 6216, 1301 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20229, Tel. (202) 927-1426.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Customs invites the general public and other 
Federal agencies to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 
104-13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments should address the accuracy 
of the burden estimates and ways to minimize the burden including the 
use of automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of 
information technology, as well as other relevant aspects of the 
information collection. The comments that are submitted will be 
summarized and included in the Customs request for Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) approval. All comments will become a matter of public 
record. In this document Customs is soliciting comments concerning the 
following information collection:

    Title: Line Release Regulations.
    OMB Number: 1515-0181.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Abstract: Line release was developed to release and track high 
volume and repetitive shipments using bar code technology and PCS. An 
application is submitted to Customs by the filer and a common commodity 
classification code (C4) is assigned to the application.
    Current Actions: There are no changes to the information 
collection. This submission is being submitted to extend the expiration 
date.
    Type of Review: Extension (without change).
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 168.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,200.
    Estimated Total Annualized Cost on the Public: $285,000.
John Turner,
Acting Leader, Printing and Records Services Group.
[FR Doc. 96-10416 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50943

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHNNY DELAROSA, also known as Juanillo De La Rosa,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-84-2

Before SMITH, STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Delarosa appeals the life sentence imposed following his guilty

plea conviction to conspiracy with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of

cocaine. Delarosa contends that his guilty plea must be set aside because he was

not adequately informed of the possible sentencing consequences of his guilty

plea. Specifically, he contends that the Government failed to adequately notify

him that it was going to use his prior 1985 California conviction for possession

of marijuana for sale to support an enhancement to life imprisonment. He

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 21, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50943

2

further asserts that the Government failed to notify him that it was going to

present evidence of a conspiracy involving 170 kilograms of cocaine in support

of a life sentence. He argues that the totality of the circumstances warrants the

withdrawal of his guilty plea.

Delarosa’s assertions are not supported by the record. The Government

specifically advised Delarosa via indictment of the two convictions it planned to

use to support a life sentence enhancement upon conviction. See United States

v. Arnold, 467 F.3d 880, 886 (5th Cir. 2006). Further, as the district court noted

at the sentencing hearing, “[i]t’s preposterous that [Delarosa] states he had no

notice” of a life sentence when one reviews the rearraignment transcript. The

rearraignment transcript reveals that the district court advised Delarosa several

times that he was “pleading guilty under circumstances where [he was] going to

get life.” See United States v. Jones, 905 F.2d 867, 868-69 (5th Cir. 1990); United

States v. Pearson, 910 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1990). A review of the totality of

the circumstances in the instant case indicates Delarosa was adequately

informed of the possible sentencing consequences and that the district court did

not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. See

United States v. Powell, 354 F.3d 362, 370 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Carr,

740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10171]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Licensee Order to Show Cause

    The Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, 
has before him the following matter:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    MM  
               Licensee                       City/state          docket
                                                                   No.  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KGCX, Inc., Licensee of KGCX(AM).....  Sidney, Montana.........    96-97
Sidney Broadcasters, Inc., Licensee    Sidney, Montana.........  .......
 of KGCH-FM.                                                            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (Regarding the silent status of Stations KGCX(AM) and KGCH-FM).
    Pursuant to Section 312(a) (3) and (4) of the Communications Act of 
1934, as amended, KGCX, Inc. and Sidney Broadcasters, Inc. have been 
directed to show cause why the licenses for Stations KGCX(AM) and KGCH-
FM should not be revoked, at a proceeding in which the above matter has 
been designated for hearing concerning the following issues:
    1. To determine whether KGCX, Inc. and Sidney Broadcasters, Inc. 
have the capability and intent to expeditiously resume the broadcast 
operations of KGCX(AM) and KGCH-FM consistent with the Commission's 
Rules.
    2. To determine whether KGCX, Inc. and Sidney Broadcasters have 
violated Sections 73.1740 and/or 73.1750 of the Commissions Rules.
    3. To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the 
foregoing issues, whether KGCX, Inc. and Sidney Broadcasters, Inc. are 
qualified to be and remain the licensees of Stations KGCX(AM) and KGCH-
FM.
    A copy of the complete Show Cause Order and Hearing Designation 
Order in this proceeding is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Dockets Branch (Room 320), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text may also be purchased 
from the Commission's duplicating contractor, International 
Transcription Service, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037 (telephone 202-857-3800).

Federal Communications Commission.
Stuart B. Bedell,
Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-10171 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 17, 2021
No. 04-21-00068-CR
Albert Araiza GARCIA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR0541 Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief was originally due May 12, 2021. On June 3, 2021, this court issued an order directing appellant’s appointed counsel, Mr. Michael J. Sawyer, to file, no later than June 14, 2021, a response stating a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. Our order cautioned Mr. Sawyer that if he failed to file an adequate response by June 14, 2021, this appeal would be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court would be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). We have received no response. Pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we abate this case to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following questions: (1) Does appellant desire to prosecute his appeal?

(2) Is appellant indigent? If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel. (3) Has appointed or retained counsel abandoned the appeal? Because sanctions may be necessary, the trial court should address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the hearing. The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first two questions by sworn affidavit from the appellant. The trial court shall, however, order the appellant’s counsel to be present at the hearing. The trial court is further ORDERED to file supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records in this court, no later than July 19, 2021 , which shall include: (1) a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) written findings of fact and conclusionsof law, and (3) recommendations addressing the above enumerated questions. All appellate filing

dates are ABATED pending further orders from this court.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1092]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. TH 
Agriculture & Nutrition Co., Inc. and Elf Atochem North America, Inc., 
Case No. 96-D-41-N, was lodged on January 8, 1996, with the United 
States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Northern 
Division. This settlement agreement resolves the claims asserted by the 
United States in an enforcement action brought on behalf of the 
Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') against two potentially 
responsible parties (``PRPs'') pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 
42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq. The complaint alleges the PRPs are liable 
to perform an Interim Remedial Action at the TH Agriculture & Nutrition 
Superfund Site (``Site'') and to reimburse the Superfund for response 
costs incurred and to be incurred in connection with the Site. Under 
the Consent Decree, the PRPs shall perform interim remedial measures 
designed to prevent any further migration of a plume of contamination 
in the surficial aquifer and shall pay $557,000 of past identified 
response costs associated with the Site and all future costs associated 
with performance of the Interim Remedial Action.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. TH Agriculture & Nutrition Co., Inc. and Elf Atochem 
North America, Inc., 90-11-3-1426.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, One Court Square, Suite 201, Montgomery, 
Alabama, 36104; the Region IV office of the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, 345 Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, GA 30365; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. In 
requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $33.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 96-1092 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5709 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals entitled 

to Medicare Part A to make contributions to health savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 

Mrs. FISCHBACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals entitled to Medicare Part A to make contributions to health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INDIVIDUALS ENTITLED TO PART A OF MEDI4 CARE BY REASON OF AGE ALLOWED TO CON5 TRIBUTE TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1)(B) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ 

8 at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at the end 

9 of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the 

10 end the following new clause: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5709 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) entitlement to hospital insurance 

2 benefits under part A of title XVIII of the 

3 Social Security Act by reason of section 

4 226(a) of such Act.’’. 

5 (b) TREATMENT OF HEALTH INSURANCE PUR6 CHASED FROM ACCOUNT.—Section 223(d)(2)(C)(iv) of 

7 such Code is amended by inserting ‘‘and who is not an 

8 eligible individual’’ after ‘‘who has attained the age speci9 fied in section 1811 of the Social Security Act’’. 

10 (c) COORDINATION WITH PENALTY ON DISTRIBU11 TIONS NOT USED FOR QUALIFIED MEDICAL EX12 PENSES.—Section 223(f)(4)(C) of such Code is amended 

13 by striking ‘‘Subparagraph (A)’’ and inserting ‘‘Except in 

14 the case of an eligible individual, subparagraph (A)’’. 

15 (d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 223(b)(7) 

16 of such Code is amended by inserting ‘‘(other than an enti17 tlement to benefits described in subsection (c)(1)(B)(iv))’’ 

18 after ‘‘Social Security Act’’. 

19 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to months beginning after Decem21 ber 31, 2023, in taxable years ending after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10600]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Parts 200, 232, and 241

[Docket No. FR-3349-C-04]
RIN 2502-AF74


Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing 
Commissioner; Revision of FHA Multifamily Processing and Fees; 
Technical Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule which 
was published on Monday, April 1, 1996, (61 FR 14410). That final rule 
concerned FHA multifamily mortgage insurance.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Luton, Director, New Products 
Division, Office of Multifamily Housing Development, Room 6138, 
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20410-8000, telephone (202) 708-2556. (This is not a 
toll-free telephone number.) Hearing- or speech-impaired may access 
this number via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service at 
1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final rule that is the subject of these corrections revised 24 
CFR 200.40 and 200.45 of the FHA multifamily mortgage insurance 
regulations to increase processing/commitment fees and to make certain 
changes in the stages of processing.

Need for Correction

    As published, the preamble to final regulations omitted a word 
which may prove to be misleading.
    Accordingly, FR Doc. 96-7640, a final rule published in the Federal 
Register on April 1, 1996 (61 FR 14410), is corrected as follows:
    On page 14411, in the preamble, in the first column, in the first 
paragraph under the heading ``4. Elimination of Conditional Commitment 
Stage,'' the third line is corrected by adding the word ``except'' 
after the word ``stage''.

    Dated: April 18, 1996.
Stephanie A. Smith,
Acting General Deputy, Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing 
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 96-10600 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-27-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11105]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 10, 1996.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-11105 Filed 4-30-96; 3:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

I, Terry G. Roussel, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 (b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this reported our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|                       | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 11, 2006 | Terry G. Roussel                                       |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

----
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), I, Michael L.
Pungello, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2005
-----------------------

By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
   -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)