alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Roman HEMPHILL, Appellant v. Fred JOHNSON, etc., et al., Appellees. Robert DRISCOLL, Appellant, v. Paul K. DELO, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 95-3357, 95-4037.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

April 17, 1997.

On further consideration, the petitions for rehearing by the panel filed by the appellees are granted. The panel’s opinions are vacated and new opinions will be issued at a future date. The grant of rehearing by the panel moots the appellees’ suggestions for rehearing en banc and no action will be taken on the suggestions.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9932]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed additions to Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee has received proposals to add to the Procurement 
List services to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons 
who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE: May 22, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman, (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 47(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested 
persons an opportunity to submit comments on the possible impact of the 
proposed actions.
    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, all entities of 
the Federal Government (except as otherwise indicated) will be required 
to procure the services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
current contractors for the services.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Comments on this certification are invited. Commenters should 
identify the statement(s) underlying the certification on which they 
are providing additional information.
    The following services have been proposed for addition to 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Janitorial/Custodial
U.S. Courthouse (Whittle Building)
Knoxville, Tennessee
NPA: Goodwill Industries--Knoxville, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee

Medical Transcription
Veterans Administration Medical Center
508 Fulton Street
Durham, North Carolina
NPA: Durham Exchange Club Industries, Inc.
Durham, North Carolina
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-9932 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
Certification Pursuant to
                        1850 USC, Section 1350,
                        As Adopted Pursuant To
           Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Marc E. Combs, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peer
Review Mediation and Arbitration, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and  procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 23, 2011          /s/Marc E. Combs
                               ----------------------------
                               Marc E. Combs, Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 15, 2007
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer                      |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1109]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP88-391-019]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

January 19, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 5, 1996 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Second Revised Sheet 
No. 264. Such tariff sheet is proposed to be effective September 13, 
1995.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to comply 
with the ``Order Denying Rehearing and Clarifying Order and Accepting 
Compliance Filing, Subject to Condition'' issued December 21, 1995 
(December 21 Order). The December 21 Order directed Transco to file 
revised tariff sheets reflecting certain modifications which Transco 
agreed to make in its response to a limited protest filed by Brooklyn 
Union Gas Company. Specifically, in compliance with the December 21 
Order, Transco has inserted additional language into Section 13.5(a) of 
its General Terms and Conditions to clarify that the compensation 
provided under Section 13.5 shall be operable only in situations of 
force majeure conditions or adverse governmental action to the extent 
they cause an apportionment of supply on a priority rather than on a 
pro rata basis.
    Transco respectfully requests that the Commission grant a waiver of 
Section 154.22 of its Regulations, and any other waivers that may be 
necessary, in order that the enclosed tariff sheet, be made effective 
as proposed herein.
    Transco is serving copies of the instant filing on the parties in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1109 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 11

- 1447

RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

v.

M.R.; J.R., PARENTS OF MINOR CHILD E.R.

v.

JANET CENNAME

M.R.; J.R. Parents of Minor Child E.R.,

Appellants

On Appeal from the United States Distri ct Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 2

- 09

- cv

- 02503)

District Judge: Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

John F.X. Reilly, counsel for Appellees t he Ridley School District and Janet Cenname

, in

addition to having a private practice is also employed as an attorney for the Delaware

County Office of the District Attorney. When the clerk entered Mr. Reilly’s appearance

in the above entitled appeal, the clerk entered the address for the office of the District

Attorney r ather that the address for Mr. Reilly’s private practice.

Accordingly, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion filed May 17, 2012, is hereby

amended to reflect the correct address for John F. X. Reilly as follows:

John F.X. Reilly (Argued)

101 W. Ba ltimore Avenue, Second Floor

Media, PA 19063

Counsel for AppelleesFor the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date d : May 31, 2012

SLC/cc: Jennifer C. Lowman

John F.X. Reilly

Leonard Reiser

Alan L. Yatvin
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry PARRISH, Appellant.

No. WD 48037.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 12, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 31, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 15, 1994.

Seth D. Schumaker, Lancaster, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from convictions of sexual assault in the first degree, § 566.040, RSMo.1986, possession of a controlled substance, § 195.-202, RSMo.Supp.1993, and delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo.Supp. 1993; and from concurrent prison terms to-talling ten years.

Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5668 

To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 during 

the first lapse in appropriations in a fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mrs. SYKES (for herself, Ms. BROWN, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, 

Ms. SALINAS, Mr. NICKEL, Ms. JACOBS, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. 

TOKUDA, and Ms. BROWNLEY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act 

of 2008 during the first lapse in appropriations in a 

fiscal year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Feed Our Families 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATIONS FOR SNAP DURING FIRST LAPSE 

7 IN APPROPRIATIONS IN A FISCAL YEAR. 

8 In the case of any fiscal year beginning after Sep9 tember 30, 2023, there is appropriated, out of any money 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5668 IH

1 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as 

2 are necessary to carry out the Food and Nutrition Act 

3 of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) for the first 90-day period 

4 beginning on the first day of a lapse in discretionary ap5 propriations for carrying out such Act for such fiscal year: 

6 Provided, That such funds shall be placed in reserve for 

7 use only in such amounts and at such times as may be8 come necessary to carry out program operations: Provided 

9 further, That such funds shall remain available until ex10 pended. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41147

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL LUCIO-FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-00-CR-112-1

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul

Lucio-Flores (Lucio) has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Lucio was notified but filed no response. Our independent review

of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. The motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of Altrimega  Health  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date  March 31, 2005                      By:  /s/ John Gandy
                                               ---------------------------

                                          Name:    John Gandy
                                          Title:   Chief Executive Officer



Date  March 31, 2005                      By:  /s/ Ron Hendrix
                                               ---------------------------

                                           Name:   Ron Hendrix
                                           Title:  Chief Financial Officer




         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altrimega Health
Corporation and will be retained by Altrimega  Health  Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6671

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO JERMAINE MOORE, a/k/a 10-4,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cr-00327-D-3; 5:16-cv-00383-

D)

Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 22, 2017

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Jermaine Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley, Rudy E. Renfer, Seth 

Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Jermaine Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED