alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20875-20876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11420]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice that a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials, authorized by 38 
U.S.C. 2401, will be held at the Hacienda Hotel, 3950 Las Vegas 
Boulevard South, Las Vegas, NV 89119. This will be the committee's 
second meeting of fiscal year 1996.

[[Page 20876]]

    The meeting will convene at 8 a.m. (PT) on June 6, 1996 and will 
adjourn at 5 p.m. (PT) June 6, 1996. The Advisory Committee meeting 
will be combined with the biennial conference of the National Cemetery 
System. The purpose of this meeting to conduct routine advisory 
committee business and to give the Committee members an opportunity to 
meet and discuss issues with national cemetery directors. The agenda 
will specifically include the following: ethics training; a briefing 
and update from the Director, National Cemetery System; customer 
service initiatives; and, reinventing government within National 
Cemetery System.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Those wishing to attend 
should contact Ms. Dina Wood, Special Assistant to the Director, 
National Cemetery System [phone (202) 273-5235], no later than May 20, 
1996. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file a 
statement with the Committee. Individuals wishing to appear before the 
Committee should indicate this in a letter to the Director, National 
Cemetery System (40) at 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 20420. 
In any such letters, the writers must fully identify themselves and 
state the organization or association or person they represent. Also, 
to the extent practicable, letters should indicate the subject matter 
they want to discuss. Oral presentations should be limited to 10 
minutes in duration. Those wishing to file written statements to be 
submitted to the Committee must also mail, or otherwise deliver them to 
the Director, National Cemetery System.
    Letters and written statements as discussed above must be mailed or 
delivered in time to reach the Director, National Cemetery System, by 
May 15, 1996. Oral statements will be heard only between 3 p.m. and 
4:30 p.m. (PT), June 6, 1996.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-11420 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0644

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

MATTHEW ROBERTS,

Petitioner and Appellee,

and

FIDELA ROBERTS,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

With good cause appearing, the Appellant is given an extension of 

time until January 29, 2024 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s 

opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 8 2024

01/08/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0644
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to July 26, 2022 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### None Available

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report
        of BioForce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for
        the
        period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory D. Brown, Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
        to
        the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Gregory D. Brown
 Gregory
        D. Brown
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 November
        14, 2007
 
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has
        been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
        foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely
        pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
        and
        (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are
        not
        being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
        document.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21488-21489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11655]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    In accordance with Department of Justice policy, 28 C.F.R. 50.7, 
notice is hereby given that a Consent Decree in United States v. Martin 
H. Frimberger, et al., Civil No. 3:90CV136 (DJS) (D. Conn.), was lodged 
with the United District Court for the District of Connecticut on March 
29, 1996.
    The proposed Consent Decree concerns alleged violations of sections 
301(a) and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and 1344. 
Defendant Martin H. Frimberger placed fill material and structures in 
navigable waters of the United States along the shoreline of the 
property at 207 Ayers

[[Page 21489]]

Road, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, without a permit as required by 33 
U.S.C. 1344. Defendants Maia and Kathryn Chiat, successors in title to 
the property, will perform certain removal and restoration work and 
will apply to the Army Corps of Engineers for a permit to maintain the 
fill remaining after the restoration work is completed.
    The United States Attorney's Office will receive written comments 
relating to the proposed Consent Decree for a period of 30 days from 
the date of publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to 
John B. Hughes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Connecticut, 
P.O. Box 1824, New Haven, Connecticut 06508, and should refer to United 
States v. Martin H. Frimberger, Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. and Maia and 
Kathryn Chiat, Civil No. 3:90CV136 (DJS) (D. Conn.).
    The Complaint and proposed Consent Decree in this case may be 
examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the 
District of Connecticut, 450 Main Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103.
Letitia J. Grishaw,
Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environmental & Natural Resources 
Division.
[FR Doc. 96-11655 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH GARNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 511 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH GARNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 512 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH GARNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 513 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[511 EAL 2021, 512 EAL 2021, 513 EAL 2021 and 514 EAL 2021] - 2

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH GARNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 514 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5861 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5861

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
   To extend reemployment services and eligibility assessments to all 
      claimants for unemployment benefits, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Building on Reemployment 
Improvements to Deliver Good Employment for Workers Act'' or the 
``BRIDGE for Workers Act''.
SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR REEMPLOYMENT SERVICES.
    (a) In General.--Section 306(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 506(a)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``individuals referred to reemployment services 
    as described in section 303(j)'' and inserting ``claimants for 
    regular compensation, including claimants referred to reemployment 
    services as described in section 303(j),''; and
        (2) by striking ``such individuals'' and inserting ``such 
    claimants''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-70342, 33-63752,333-11975, 333-80925, 333-40540, 333-88490 and 333-127414)of our reports dated March 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Station Casinos, Inc. and its subsidiaries,Station Casinos, Inc. and its subsidiaries management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Station Casinos, Inc.and its subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2005.

/s/Ernst & YoungLLP

LasVegas, Nevada

March 13, 2006

----
#### Gary DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MID-CONTINENT VAN SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Respondent.

No. 63351.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 31, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 19, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 23, 1993.

*617Gary Davis, pro se.

Anthony F. Vaiana, St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Gary Davis, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant, Mid-Continent Van Service, Inc., pursuant to a jury verdict. Plaintiff had brought an action for bodily injury arising out of an automobile accident.

Defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs brief and dismiss the appeal is denied.

The evidence in the record in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11490]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Applications for Permit

    The following applicants have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.):

PRT-814546

Applicant: James Spotila, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA

    The applicant requests a permit to import blood and tissue samples 
from leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), green sea turtle 
(Chelonia mydas agassizi) and olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys 
olivacea) from Costa Rica and India for the purpose of scientific 
research that will benefit the species in the wild. This notice covers 
activities conducted by the applicant over a five year period.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 430, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received 
by the Director within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
430, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/358-
2281).

    Dated: May 3, 1996.
Caroline Anderson,
Acting Chief Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 96-11490 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

s0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141037

MILFORD HOUSING, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141037 COA: 295113 Oakland CC: 2009-102083-AS VILLAGE OF MILFORD, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael G. DRURY, Appellant.

No. WD 45515.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 19, 1993.

Robert G. Duncan, Kansas City, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and KENNEDY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of forgery, section 570.090.1, RSMol986, with a sentence of a $2,000 fine.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002

I, James D. Bowden certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Date: 01/30/09                                        
|                                                      
|/S/    JAMES D.
BOWDEN                                
|James D. Bowden, Chief Executive Officer and President



44
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to July 26, 2022)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5658 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5658

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to require mail-in ballots to 
    use the Postal Service barcode service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

    Ms. Porter (for herself, Ms. Mace, Mr. Mfume, Mr. Donalds, Mr. 
 Connolly, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Ciscomani) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                           and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to require mail-in ballots to 
    use the Postal Service barcode service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vote by Mail Tracking Act''.

SEC. 2. MAIL-IN BALLOTS AND POSTAL SERVICE BARCODE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 3001 of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) Any ballot sent within the United States for an election for 
Federal office is nonmailable and shall not be carried or delivered by 
mail unless the ballot is mailed in an envelope that--
            ``(1) contains a Postal Service barcode (or successive 
        service or marking) that enables tracking of each individual 
        ballot;
            ``(2) satisfies requirements for ballot envelope design 
        that the Postal Service may promulgate by regulation;
            ``(3) satisfies requirements for machineable letters that 
        the Postal Service may promulgate by regulation; and
            ``(4) includes the Official Election Mail Logo (or any 
        successor label that the Postal Service may establish for 
        ballots).''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to any election for Federal office occurring after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Albert SPICER, Defendant/Appellant. Albert SPICER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 62158, 65527.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

April 11, 1995.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

*PER*CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced in accord with the jury’s assessment to a twelve year prison term. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).