alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19236-19237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10763]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

49 CFR Parts 1100 Through 1149

[STB Ex Parte No. 527]


Expedited Procedures for Processing Rail Rate Reasonableness, 
Exemption and Revocation Proceedings

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment due 
date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The original comment due date in this proceeding of May 6, 
1996, is extended to May 20, 1996, at the request of the Association of 
American Railroads (AAR), Edison Electric Institute (EEI), National 
Grain & Feed Association (NG&FA), National Industrial Transportation 
League (NITL), The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. (SPI), and 
Western Coal Traffic League (WCTL).

DATES: Comments are due on May 20, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send comments (an original and 10 copies) referring to STB 
Ex Parte No. 527 to: Surface Transportation Board, Office of the 
Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution Ave., N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. Parties are encouraged to submit all 
pleadings and attachments on a 3.5-inch diskette in WordPerfect 5.1 
format.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Stilling, (202) 927-7312. 
(TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 22, 1996, an Advance Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) was served and published in the Federal 
Register, at 61 FR 11799, soliciting comments on how existing 
regulations could be modified to expedite the handling of rail rate 
reasonableness and exemption/revocation proceedings. On April 19, 1996, 
AAR, EEI, NG&FA, NITL, SPI, and WCTL jointly requested an extension of 
the comment due date until May 20, 1996, so that they can better 
respond to the ANPR. Because the parties requesting the extension 
represent a significant segment of railroad and shipper interests that 
are seeking ``to identify and develop consensus positions on the major 
issues,'' the due date for comments is extended to May 20, 1996. Given 
our tight statutory deadline, we do not anticipate further extensions.

    Decided: April 26, 1996.


[[Page 19237]]


    By the Board, Linda J. Morgan, Chairman.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10763 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7520

Whirlpool Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5712 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5712

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 220 Fremont Street in Kiel, Wisconsin, as the ``Trooper Trevor J. 
                     Casper Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2023

  Mr. Grothman (for himself, Mr. Steil, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Van Orden, Ms. 
  Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Tiffany, and Mr. Gallagher) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 220 Fremont Street in Kiel, Wisconsin, as the ``Trooper Trevor J. 
                     Casper Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TROOPER TREVOR J. CASPER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 220 Fremont Street in Kiel, Wisconsin, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Trooper Trevor J. Casper Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Trooper 
Trevor J. Casper Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML AppletonFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”), I, Benjamin Weston, Chief Executive Officer and President ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantof the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006               |                |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                  |                |   |
| By                                    | /s/ BENJAMIN WESTON |   |
| Benjamin Weston                       |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|                                       |                     |  |  |

 

19

----
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The following are the subsidiaries of
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.:



| | 1. | Arius Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Arius Two, Inc., a Delaware corporation (wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Bioral Nutrient Delivery, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (94.5% of Class B Shares and 100% of Class A Shares are owned by the Registrant).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T he Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western * District of Missouri, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3452MN

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Edward Boler, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: February 10, 1998

Filed: February 20, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge. *

_____________ PER CURIAM. Edward B oler appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribut e cocaine. On appeal, Boler claims the district court committed error in refusing t o suppress cocaine seized during the follow-up search of Boler's duffle bag. W e disagree. H aving reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district cour t correctly ruled that Boler impliedly consented to a second search of his duffl e bag. We thus uphold Boler's conviction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of CenterPoint Energy
Transition Bond Company II, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Marc Kilbride, Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Marc Kilbride
-------------------------------------
Marc Kilbride
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 10, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5110 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5110

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to clarify 
that the prohibition on the use of Federal education funds for certain 
   weapons does not apply to the use of such weapons for training in 
              archery, hunting, or other shooting sports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Hunting Heritage and 
Education Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL EDUCATION FUNDS 
              FOR CERTAIN WEAPONS AND RELATED TRAINING.

    Section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7906(7)) is amended by inserting ``, except that this 
paragraph shall not apply to the use of funds under this Act for 
activities carried out under programs authorized by this Act that are 
otherwise permissible under such programs and that provide students 
with educational instruction or educational enrichment activities, such 
as archery, hunting, other shooting sports, or culinary arts'' before 
the period at the end.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Liang Qiao, Chief Executive Officer of Bio-Bridge Science, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Bridge Science,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Dr. Liang Qiao
-----------------------
By: Dr. Liang Qiao
Chief Executive Officer
#### Jerome STERNLIEB, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51586.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 13, 1996.

Stephen J. Harris, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMITH, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

*ORDER*

Appeal of dismissal of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as being untimely filed.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4508

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Eric M. Leslie, the Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer of Park Place Energy Corp., hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Park Place Energy Corp., for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Park Place Energy Corp.

Date: May 14, 2008.



/s/ Eric M.
Leslie
Eric M. Leslie Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re David Timothy Butterfield

Appellate case number: 01-18-00903-CV

Trial court case number: 97319-F

Trial court: 300th District Court of Brazoria County

Relator, David Timothy Butterfield, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

and a “Motion to Stay Proceedings.” The motion to stay is granted. The trial court 

proceedings in Case No. 97319-F, pending in the 300th District Court of Brazoria

County, Texas are stayed. The stay is effective until disposition of relator’s petition for a 

writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Terry Jennings______

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __November 8, 2018__
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5771 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit Members 

of Congress from making direct and personal solicitations of campaign 

funds when a Government shutdown is in effect, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2023 

Mr. NUNN of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit Members of Congress from making direct and 

personal solicitations of campaign funds when a Government shutdown is in effect, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘People Before Politics 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5771 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FROM MAK2 ING DIRECT AND PERSONAL SOLICITATIONS 

3 OF CAMPAIGN FUNDS DURING GOVERNMENT 

4 SHUTDOWN. 

5 Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

6 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 325. PROHIBITING MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FROM 

9 MAKING DIRECT AND PERSONAL SOLICITA10 TIONS OF CAMPAIGN FUNDS DURING GOV11 ERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

12 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—An individual holding the office 

13 of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident 

14 Commissioner to, the Congress may not make a direct and 

15 personal solicitation of funds in connection with an elec16 tion for Federal office at any time during which a Govern17 ment shutdown is in effect. 

18 ‘‘(b) DETERMINATION OF GOVERNMENT SHUT19 DOWN.—For purposes of this section, a Government shut20 down shall be considered to be in effect if there is a lapse 

21 in appropriations for any Federal agency or department 

22 as a result of a failure to enact a regular appropriations 

23 bill or continuing resolution.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6671

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTONIO JERMAINE MOORE, a/k/a 10

- 4 , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever, III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00327

- D

- 3 ; 5:16

- cv - 00383

- D )

Submitted : August 17, 2017 Decided: August 22, 2017

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Antonio Jermaine Moore , Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley , Rudy E. Renfer , Seth Morgan Wood , Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, fo r Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Jermaine Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circ uit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 48 4 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable c laim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion for a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED