alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18411-18412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10212]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Consent Decree in Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Action

    In accordance with the Department Policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, notice 
is hereby given that a Consent Decree in United States v. Keystone 
Sanitation Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1: CV-93-1482, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the Middle District of 
Pennsylvania on April 5, 1996.
    On September 27, 1993, the United States filed a complaint against 
the owners and operator of, and certain generators to, the Keystone 
Landfill Superfund Site (the ``Site''), pursuant to Section 107 (a) of 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 
Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). Several of the defendants named third 
and fourth parties to the action, including 97 of the defendants in the 
proposed Consent Decree. This de micromis Consent Decree resolves the 
liability of the 97 third and fourth-party defendants for the response 
costs incurred and to be incurred by the United States at the Site. The 
defendants included in the proposed de micromis Consent Decree will pay 
$1 each.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
the proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)

[[Page 18412]]

days from the date of publication of this notice. Please address 
comments to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division, Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin 
Station, Washington, DC 20044 and refer to United States v. Keystone 
Sanitation Company. Inc. et al., DOJ No. 90-11-2-656A.
    Copies of the proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office 
of the United States Attorney, Middle District of Pennsylvania, Federal 
Building and Courthouse, 228 Walnut Street, Room 217, Harrisburg, 
Pennsylvania, 17108; Region III Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, 
DC 20005 (202) 624-0892). A copy of the proposed Decree may be obtained 
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
NW., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 2005. When requesting a copy of the 
proposed Consent Decree, please enclose a check in the amount of $1.75 
(twenty-five cents per page reproduction costs) payable to the 
``Consent Decree Library.''
Joel M. Cross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 96-10212 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12047]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, June 10, 2021.

PLACE: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be held via 
teleconference.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Appeal. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-12047 Filed 6-4-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00313-CV

Dr. Michel SHAPIRO and Callaghan Square Investments, Ltd. 

f/k/a Callaghan Square Investments, Inc.,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees

v.

COX'S FIESTA SUPERMARKETS OF SAN ANTONIO, INC.,

Appellee/Cross Appellants

From the County Court at Law No 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 323200

Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 7, 2009

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.1(a)(2), stating they have resolved the dispute at issue and requesting this court

dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. TEX.R.APP.

P. 42.1(a)(2). 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Form 10-Q), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 16, 2010



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                           
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.                         
|Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than June 24, 2021.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *Heather Cook, Ames, Iowa;*                     to join the Simington Family Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Fostoria Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Farmers Savings Bank, both of Fostoria, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 4, 2021.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-12085 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00266

- CR

ALEC NAVA , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- 2080

- C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Alex Nava entered a plea of guilty to the offense of intoxication assault against
an emergency worker and elected to have a jury assess punishment. The jury assessed
punishment at 20 years confinement. We affirm.
Nava’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief asserting that he has diligently
reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel informed Nav a of his right to submit aN ava v. State Page 2

response on his own behalf. Nava did not file a response. Counsel's brief evidences a
professional evaluation of the record for error, and we conclude that counsel performed
the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. at 744; High v.

State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); s ee also In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 40 3,
407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the
proceedings, ... d ecide whether the case is wholly frivolous." See Anders v. California , 386

U.S. at 744; accord Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An
appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact."
McCoy v. Court of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10 (1988). After a review of the entire
record in this appeal, we determine the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v.

State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affir m t he trial
court's judgment.
Counsel's request that he be allowed to withdraw from representation of Nava is
granted. Additionally, counsel must send Nava a copy of our decision, notify Nava of
his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, a nd send this Court a letter
certifying counsel's compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 48.4; see also In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d at 409 n.22.N ava v. State Page 3 JOHN E. NEILL Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Affirmed; motion granted Opinion delivered and filed December 4 , 2019 Do not publish [CR25]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6795

JOWARSKI RUSSELL NEDD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00948-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: October 29, 2018 Decided: November 13, 2018

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jowarski Russell Nedd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jowarski Russell Nedd seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court’s order was entered on 

the docket on May 25, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on June 22, 2018.

*

 Parties 

are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note 

an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). 

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

Nedd’s notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district court’s entry 

of judgment. However, Nedd sent the district court a letter dated August 14, 2017, 

stating that he had not received a response about his case and requesting an updated 

status of the case. We construe this letter as a motion to reopen the appeal period. See 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). We remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the 

district court to determine when Nedd received notice of the district court’s entry of its 

final order and whether he is entitled to a reopening of the appeal period pursuant to Rule 

4(a)(6). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further 

proceedings.

REMANDED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date that it could have been delivered to prison officials for mailing 

to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION**

**of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

I, Manouch Moshayedi, ChiefExecutive Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report of theCompany on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI

 

Manouch Moshayedi

Chief Executive Officer March 21, 2003

I, Dan Moses, ChiefFinancial Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report of theCompany on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/DAN MOSES

Dan Moses

Chief Financial OfficerMarch 21, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10679]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Small Business Conference


Notice of Conference

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is announcing a 
conference, cosponsored by CPSC and the International Consumer Product 
Health and Safety Organization (ICPHSO), on cutting regulatory red tape 
and reducing business costs.

DATES: The conference will be held Tuesday, June 11, 1996, 9 a.m.-4:30 
p.m., at One World Trade Center, 43rd Floor (Oval Room), New York, N.Y. 
Persons who wish to attend must register by May 24, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The CPSC New York Regional Office at 
(212) 466-1616.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. What is the conference about?

    This dynamic conference, sponsored by CPSC and ICPHSO, will provide 
you with valuable information on how CPSC is helping small business to 
cut red tape and reduce business costs.
    Small Business Administration's Administrator, Phil Lader, will 
keynote the event. It will include panel discussions on (1) CPSC's 
structure and regulations, (2) how to make import/export laws work for 
small business, (3) how to take advantage of CPSC's information and 
data resources, (4) women and small business, and (5) a round table 
discussion where CPSC and other officials listen to you. CPSC's 
Chairman Ann Brown will also announce the establishment of CPSC's 
``Small Business Ombudsman.''

B. Who should attend the conference?

    The conference will be especially valuable to:

--Small business owners
--Manufacturers, retailers, and wholesalers
--Importers and exporters
--Freight forwarders
--Customs brokers
--International trade representatives

C. How do I register for the conference?

    You should obtain a copy of the memorandum, proposed agenda, and 
advance registration form from CPSC's New York Regional Office by 
telephoning (212) 466-1616. When completed, the form and the fee of $75 
per person should be mailed to ICPHSO, P.O. Box 3425, York, PA 17402, 
no later than May 24, 1996.

    Dated: April 24, 1996.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-10679 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### Ronnie James MASON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Nos. 254-88 to 256-88.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

June 7, 1989.

Gerald A. Burks, Galveston, for appellant.

Michael J. Guarino, Dist. Atty., and Jim Baggett, Asst. Dist. Atty., Galveston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery and one count of aggravated sexual assault. The punishment was assessed at twenty (20) years in the Texas Department of Corrections. On direct appeal the convictions were affirmed. *Mason v. State,*746 S.W.2d 13 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1988). From this action the appellant brings a petition for discretionary review to this Court.

In the petition applicant alleges that the district court was without jurisdiction in that the record reflects that appellant was a juvenile at the time he committed the offenses and that the juvenile court had retained jurisdiction over another offense which arose from the same transaction. When the Court of Appeals decided the issue they did not have the benefit of this Court’s ruling in *Richardson v. State,*770 S.W.2d 797 (1989). While we express no opinion on the ultimate outcome of this case, it is our opinion that the Court of Appeals should be given the opportunity to *562reevaluate their decision m light of the more recent holding of this Court.

Therefore the cause will be remanded to the Fourteenth Court of Appeal for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Nuance Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Blasing, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|March 24, 2004
      
      /s/    KAREN BLASING
      Karen Blasing
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Daniel Drummond, Chief Financial Officer of Wren, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  October 22, 2008  /s/ Daniel Drummond Daniel Drummond Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Wren, Inc. and will be retained by Wren, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) AND (b))



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby individually
certifies in his capacity as an officer of U.S.I. Holdings Corporation (the Company) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.



|                      |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  | /s/    DAVID L.
ESLICK                 
|                      |  | David L. Eslick Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)) and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his
respective knowledge.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
U.S.I. Holdings Corporation and will be retained by U.S.I. Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.