Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 30255 

1 Jindal Poly Films Limited of India is also known 

as Jindal Poly Films Limited. Jindal Poly Films 

Limited of India’s cross-owned company is: Jindal 

Films India Ltd. This cross-owned company is 

identified in the Preliminary Results. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018, 85 FR 74679 (November 23, 2020), 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum at 5–6; see also Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018, 86 FR 26700 (May 17, 2021) (Final 

Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (IDM) at ‘‘Attribution of Subsidies.’’ 

2This rate applies to merchandise produced and/ 

or esported by Jindal Poly Films Linited of India or 

its cross-owned company Jindal Films India Ltd. 

3See Final Results IDM. 

1See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value: Floor-Standing, Metal-Top 

Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China, 69 FR 35296 (June 24, 

2004) (Final Determination); see also Notice of 

Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: 

Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and 

Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China, 69 FR 47868 (August 6, 2004) (the Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 7709 (February 1, 2021) (Initiation). 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to 

Participate: Third Five-Year Sunset Review of 

Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and 

Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated February 16, 2021. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Substantive Response of Home Products 

International, Inc. to the Notice of Initiation of the 

Third Five-Year Sunset Review of Floor-Standing, 

Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated March 

3, 2021. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on February 1, 2021,’’ dated March 23, 

2021. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–825] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From India: Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) published notice in the 

Federal Register of May 17, 2021 in 

which Commerce determined that Jindal 

Poly Films Limited of India (Jindal), 

producer and/or exporter of 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (PET film) from India, received 

countervailable subsidies during the 

period of review (POR), January 1, 2018, 

through December 31, 2018. This notice 

failed to list the cross owned affiliate of 

Jindal Poly Films Limited. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Konrad Ptaszynski at (202) 482–6187 or 

Nicholas Czajkowski at (202) 482–1395; 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of May 17, 

2021, in FR Doc 2021–10350, on page 

26700, in the second column, correct 

the Final Results of Administrative 

Review as follows: 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

In accordance with section 777A(e)(1) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we 

determine the total estimated net 

countervailable subsidy rates for the 

period January 1, 2018, through 

December 31, 2018 to be: 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Subsidy rate 

(percent 

ad valorem) 

Jindal Poly Films Limited of 

India 1 ................................ 2 11.67 

Background 

On May 17, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

final results of the administrative review 

of the countervailing duty order on PET 

film from India covering the period 

January 1, 2018 through December 31, 

2018.3 We failed to include Jindal Poly 

Films Limited of India’s cross owned 

affiliate in the notice. We are correcting 

the Final Results to clarify that the 

countervailable subsidy rate for the 

mandatory respondent, Jindal Poly 

Films Limited of India applies to its 

cross owned affiliate, Jindal Films India 

Ltd. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended. 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11846 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–888] 

Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing 

Tables and Certain Parts Thereof From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Expedited Third Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on floor-standing, metal-top 

ironing tables and certain parts thereof 

(ironing tables) from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable June 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chelsey Simonovich, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone 

(202) 482–1979. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In 2004, Commerce published in the 

Federal Register its final affirmative 

determination of sales at less than fair 

value and AD order on ironing tables 

from China.1 On February 1, 2021, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the third sunset review of 

the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2

On February 16, 2021, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

within the 15-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) from Home 

Products International, Inc. (the 

petitioner).3 The petitioner claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers, 

producers, or wholesalers in the United 

States of a domestic like product. On 

March 3, 2021, Commerce received 

complete substantive responses to the 

notice of initiation from domestic 

interested parties within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).4 Commerce received no 

substantive responses from respondent 

interested parties. 

On March 23, 2021, Commerce 

notified the U.S. International Trade 

Commission that it did not receive an 

adequate substantive response from 

respondent interested parties.5 As a 

result, Commerce conducted an 

expedited, i.e., 120-day, sunset review 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
30256 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum: Final Results of Expedited Third 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and 

Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Potassium 

Permanganate from the People’s Republic of China, 

49 FR 3897 (January 31, 1984) (Order). 

2 See Potassium Permanganate from the People’s 

Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping 

Duty Order, 81 FR 14835 (March 18, 2016). 

3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 7709 (February 1, 2021). 

4 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to 

Participate of Petitioner Carus LLC,’’ dated February 

12, 2021. 

5 Id. 

6 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petitioner’s Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation Carus LLC,’’ dated 

March 3, 2021 at 1. 

7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decisions 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Potassium Permanganate from the People’s 

of the Order pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

consists of floor-standing, metal-top 

ironing tables, assembled or 

unassembled, complete or incomplete, 

and certain parts thereof. For a complete 

description of the products covered, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, including the likelihood 

of continuation or recurrence of 

dumping in the event of revocation, and 

the magnitude of dumping margins 

likely to prevail if the orders were 

revoked. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. A list of 

topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached to 

this notice as an Appendix. In addition, 

a complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail would be weightedaverage margins up to 157.68 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to the APO 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). 

Timely written notification of the 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

VII. Final Results of the Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–11845 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–001] 

Potassium Permanganate From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Expedited Fifth Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this fifth 

expedited sunset review, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

finds that revocation of the antidumping 

duty (AD) order on potassium 

permanganate from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable June 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2593. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 31, 1984, Commerce 

issued the AD order on potassium 

permanganate from China.1 On March 

18, 2016, Commerce published the most 

recent continuation of the Order.2 On 

February 1, 2021, Commerce published 

the Notice of Initiation of the fifth 

sunset review of Order, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).3 On February 12, 

2021, Commerce received a notice of 

intent to participate from Carus LLC (the 

petitioner), a domestic producer of 

potassium permanganate and the 

petitioner in the underlying 

investigation, within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).4

The petitioner claimed domestic 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer 

of a domestic like product in the United 

States.5 On March 3, 2021, the 

petitioner filed its timely substantive 

response within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).6

Commerce received no substantive 

responses from any other interested 

party with respect to the Order covered 

by this sunset review, nor was a hearing 

requested. As a result, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is 

conducting an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is potassium permanganate, an 

inorganic chemical produced in freeflowing, technical, and pharmaceutical 

grades. Potassium permanganate is 

currently classifiable under subheading 

2841.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise remains dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the Order 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice.7


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES