19600 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 86 / Thursday, May 2, 1996 / Proposed Rules

3. Appendix B is added to Part 946 to

read as follows:

APPENDIX B TO PART 946—AIRPORT

TABLES

‘‘A’’ Level Service Airports

Akron, OH* ......................................... CAK.

Albany, NY* ........................................ ALB.

Atlanta, GA* ∂ .................................... ATL.

Baltimore, MD* ................................... BWI.

Boston, MA∂ * .................................... BOS.

Charlotte, NC∂ .................................. CLT.

Chicago-O’Hare (AV), IL∂ * ............... ORD.

Cincinnati, OH∂ ................................. CVG.

Columbus, OH ................................... CMH.

Dayton, OH* ....................................... DAY.

Des Moines, IA* ................................. DSM.

Detroit, MI∂ * ...................................... DTW.

Fairbanks, AK* ................................... FAI.

Fresno, CA* ....................................... FAT.

Greensboro, NC* ............................... GSO.

Hartford, CT* ...................................... BDL.

Indianapolis, IN* ................................. IND.

Kansas City, MO* .............................. MCI.

Lansing, MI* ....................................... LAN.

Las Vegas, NV ................................... LAS.

Los Angeles (AV), CA∂ ..................... LAX.

Louisville, KY* .................................... SDF.

Milwaukee, WI* .................................. MKE.

Minneapolis, MN* ............................... MSP.

Newark, NJ∂ * .................................... EWR.

Oklahoma City, OK* ........................... OKC.

Phoenix, AZ∂ ..................................... PHX.

Portland, OR* ..................................... PDX.

Providence, RI* .................................. PVD.

Raleigh, NC* ...................................... RDU.

Richmond, VA* ................................... RIC.

Rochester, NY* .................................. ROC.

Rockford, IL* ...................................... RFD.

San Antonio, TX* ............................... SAT.

San Diego, CA ................................... SAN.

San Francisco, CA∂ * ........................ SFO.

Spokane, WA* .................................... GEG.

Syracuse, NY* .................................... SYR.

Tallahassee, FL ................................. TLH.

Tulsa, OK ........................................... TUL.

‘‘B’’ Level Service Airports

Baton Rouge, LA* .............................. BTR.

Billings, MT* ....................................... BIL.

Charleston, WV* ................................ CRW.

Chattanooga, TN* .............................. CHA.

Colorado Springs, CO ........................ COS.

Daytona Beach, FL ............................ DAB.

El Paso, TX ........................................ ELP.

Flint, MI .............................................. FNT.

Fort Wayne, IN ................................... FWA.

Honolulu, HI ....................................... HNL.

Huntsville, AL* .................................... HSV.

Knoxville, TN* .................................... TYS.

Lincoln, NE* ....................................... LNK.

Lubbock, TX ....................................... LBB.

Madison, WI* ...................................... MSN.

Moline, IL* .......................................... MLI.

Montgomery, AL* ............................... MGM.

Muskegon, MI* ................................... MKG.

Norfolk, VA* ....................................... ORF.

Peoria, IL ............................................ PIA.

Savannah, GA* .................................. SAV.

South Bend, IN* ................................. SBN.

Tucson, AZ ......................................... TUS.

West Palm Beach, FL* ...................... PBI.

APPENDIX B TO PART 946—AIRPORT

TABLES—Continued

Youngstown, OH* .............................. YNG.

‘‘C’’ Level Service Airports

Abilene, TX ........................................ ABI.

Alltentown, PA .................................... ABE.

Asheville, NC ..................................... AVL.

Athens, GA ......................................... AHN.

Atlantic City, NJ ................................. ACY.

Augusta, GA ....................................... AGS.

Austin, TX .......................................... AUS.

Bakerfield, CA .................................... BFL.

Bridgeport, CT .................................... BDR.

Bristol, TN .......................................... TRI.

Casper, WY ........................................ CPR.

Columbia, MO .................................... COU.

Columbus, GA .................................... CSG.

Dubuque, IA ....................................... DBQ.

Erie, PA .............................................. ERI.

Eugene, OR ....................................... EUG.

Evansville, IN ..................................... EVV.

Fargo, ND .......................................... FAR.

Fort Smith, AR ................................... FSM.

Grand Island, NE ............................... GRI.

Helena, MT ........................................ HLN.

Huntington, WV .................................. HTS.

Kahului, HI ......................................... OGG.

Key West, FL ..................................... EYW.

Lewiston, ID ....................................... LWS.

Lexington, KY ..................................... LEX.

Lynchburg, VA ................................... LYH.

Macon, GA ......................................... MCN.

Mansfield, OH .................................... MFD.

Meridian, MS ...................................... MEI.

Olympia, WA ...................................... OLM.

Port Arthur, TX ................................... BPT.

Portland, ME ...................................... PWM.

Rapid City, SD ................................... RAP.

Redding, CA ....................................... RDD.

Reno, NV ........................................... RNO.

Roanoke, VA ...................................... ROA.

Rochester, MN ................................... RST.

Salem, OR ......................................... SLE.

Santa Maria, CA ................................ SMX.

Sioux City, IA ..................................... SUX.

Springfield, IL ..................................... SPI.

Stockton, CA ...................................... SCK.

Toledo, OH ......................................... TOL.

Waco, TX ........................................... ACT.

Waterloo, IA ....................................... ALO.

Wilkes-Barre, PA ................................ AVP.

Williamsport, PA ................................. IPT.

Wilmington, DE .................................. ILG.

Worcester, MA ................................... ORH.

Yakima, WA ....................................... YKM.

‘‘D’’ Level Service Airports

Alamosa, CO ...................................... ALS.

Alpena, MI .......................................... APN.

Astoria, OR ........................................ AST.

Beckley, WV ....................................... BKW.

Caribou, ME ....................................... CAR.

Concordia, KS .................................... CNK.

Concord, NH ...................................... CON.

Elkins, WV .......................................... EKN.

Ely, NV ............................................... ELY.

Havre, MT .......................................... HVR.

Homer, AK ......................................... HOM.

Houghton Lake, MI ............................ HTL.

Huron, SD .......................................... HON.

International Falls, MN ....................... INL.

APPENDIX B TO PART 946—AIRPORT

TABLES—Continued

Kalispell, MT ...................................... FCA.

Lander, WY ........................................ LND.

Norfolk, NE ......................................... OFK.

Sault Ste. Marie, MI ........................... SSM.

Scottsbluff, NE ................................... BFF.

Sheridan, WY ..................................... SHR.

St. Cloud, MN .................................... STC.

Tupelo, MS ......................................... TUP.

Valentine, NE ..................................... VTN.

Victoria, TX ........................................ VCT.

Wichita Falls, TX ................................ SPS.

Williston, ND ...................................... ISN.

Winnemucca, NV ............................... WMC.

∂—Maximum activity (level 5) airport.

*—Long-line RVR designated site.

[FR Doc. 96–11010 Filed 5–1–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–12–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

25 CFR Part 250

RIN 1076–AD68

Indian Fishing—Hoopa Valley Indian

Reservation

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs

(BIA) proposes to eliminate 25 CFR Part

250 as mandated by Executive Order

12866 to streamline the regulatory

process and enhance the planning and

coordination of new and existing

regulations. The necessity for this rule

no longer exists.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before July 1, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Gary

Rankel, Chief, Branch of Fish, Wildlife

and Recreation, Office of Trust

Responsibilities, Bureau of Indian

Affairs, Department of the Interior, 1849

C St. NW, Mail Stop 4513–MIB,

Washington, DC 20240; OR, hand

deliver them to Room 4513 at the above

address. Comments will be available for

inspection at this address from 9:00 a.m.

to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday

beginning approximately 2 weeks after

publication of this document in the

Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary

Rankel, (202) 208–4088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The purpose for which this rule was

promulgated has been fulfilled and the

rule is no longer required. The Hoopa
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 86 / Thursday, May 2, 1996 / Proposed Rules 19601

Valley Tribe has established regulations

to protect the fishery resources and

fishing rights of Indians of the Hoopa

Valley Indian Reservation. The Yurok

Tribe, which is also covered under these

regulations, is in the final stages of

drafting regulations covering fishing by

their members. This proposed rule will

eliminate 25 CFR Part 250, Indian

Fishing—Hoopa Valley Indian

Reservation.

Public Participation Statement

Publication of the proposed rule by

the Department of the Interior

(Department) provides the public an

opportunity to participate in the

rulemaking process. Interested persons

may submit written comments regarding

the proposed rule to the location

identified in the ADDRESSES section of

this document.

Evaluation and Certification

The Department has certified to the

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) that the elimination of this rule

meets the applicable standards provided

in sections 2(a) and 2(b)(2) of Executive

Order 12778.

The Office of Management and Budget

has determined the elimination of this

rule is not a significant regulatory action

under Executive Order 12866.

There will be no economic effect on

each tribal government and tribal

organization under the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and

no additional outlays will be required of

tribal governments, tribal organizations,

and the Federal Government.

In accordance with Executive Order

12630, the Department has determined

that the elimination of this rule will not

have ‘‘significant’’ takings implications.

The elimination of this rule does not

pertain to ‘‘taking’’ of private property

interests, nor does it impact private

property.

The Department has determined that

the elimination of this rule will not have

significant federalism effects under

Executive Order 12612 and will not

interfere with the roles, rights and

responsibilities of states.

The Department has determined that

the elimination of this rule will not

constitute a major Federal action

significantly affecting the quality of the

human environment and that no

detailed statement is required pursuant

to the National Environmental Policy

Act of 1969.

No information collection is required

in the elimination of this rule that

would require approval by the Office of

Management and Budget under 44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Drafting Information

The primary author of this document

is Bettie Rushing, Bureau of Indian

Affairs.

List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 250

Indians, Indian—fishing rights.

Under the authority of Executive

Order 12866, and for the reasons stated

above, it is proposed to remove 25 CFR

part 250.

Dated: April 11, 1996.

Ada E. Deer,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 96–10838 Filed 5–01–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–02–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA–070–0001b; FRL–5452–1]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision, San

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution

Control Agency

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) which

concern the control of volatile organic

compound (VOC) emissions from the

transfer of gasoline in stationary storage

containers, delivery vessels, bulk plants,

and vehicle fuel tanks.

The intended effect of proposing

approval of these rules is to regulate

emissions of VOCs in accordance with

the requirements of the Clean Air Act,

as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

In the Final Rules Section of this

Federal Register, the EPA is approving

the state’s SIP revision as a direct final

rule without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for this approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this document. Any parties interested in

commenting on this action should do so

at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by June 3,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Daniel A.

Meer, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3), Air

and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Copies of the rule revisions and EPA’s

evaluation report of each rule are

available for public inspection at EPA’s

Region 9 office during normal business

hours. Copies of the submitted rule

revisions are also available for

inspection at the following locations:

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95812.

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District, 1999

Tuolumne Street, Fresno, CA 93721.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christine Vineyard, Rulemaking Section

[A–5–3], Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901, Telephone:

(415) 744–1197.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

document concerns San Joaquin Valley

Unified Air Pollution Control District

Rule 4621, Gasoline Transfer into

Stationary Containers, Delivery Vessels,

and Bulk Plants, and Rule 4622,

Transfer of Gasoline into Vehicle Fuel

Tanks, submitted to EPA on November

18, 1993 and May 24, 1994 by the

California Air Resources Board. For

further information, please see the

information provided in the Direct Final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: March 24, 1996.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–10569 Filed 5–01–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–W

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96–79; RM–8779]

Television Broadcasting Services;

Kearney, NE

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.