alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 906Certification**

Theundersigned officers of Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertify in their respective capacities that, to their knowledge, the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K to which this certification is attached(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

| Date: March 13, 2007 |                            |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ CHARLES H.  SHERWOOD, PH.D. |
|                      | Charles H. Sherwood, Ph.D.      |
|                      | *Chief Executive Officer*       |
|                      | /s/ KEVIN W. QUINLAN            |
|                      | Kevin W. Quinlan                |
|                      | *Chief Financial Officer*       |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for anypurpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling, under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

----
Exhibit
32.2



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To

18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Royal Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
Wendell S. Morris, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| | /s/
    Wendell S. Morris  
| | ---------------------------
| | Wendell
    S. Morris      
| | Chief
    Financial Officer



Date:
December 06, 2019
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioForce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kerry M. Frey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kerry M. Frey

Kerry M. Frey

Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2008







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




UnitedHealth Group




MEMORANDUM




To:



From:



Date:



Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement



As you are aware, the Board of Directors has requested that all Section 16 officers agree to remove
enhanced severance tied to a change in control. To this end, the following section will be
eliminated from your employment agreement:



Section 4C (Termination following a Change in Control)




Should there be a change in control and your employment is terminated without cause, you will still
be eligible for severance compensation as provided under Section 4.B.1.



Please sign this memorandum to acknowledge your agreement to this change.



Signature:



Date:



United HealthCare Services, Inc.



By:



Its:



Date:
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smartpay Express, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Smartpay Express
Inc.








Date: August
      14, 2009
            By
            /s/
      Zheng WangZheng
      WangInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10862]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice of Intent to Grant Partially Exclusive Patent License; 
Zesto Therm, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its grant to 
Zesto Therm, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable, partially exclusive 
license in the United States to practice the Government owned invention 
described in U.S. Patent No. 4,264,362 entitled ``Supercorroding 
Galvanic Cell Alloys for Generation of Heat and Gas'' issued April 28, 
1981.
    Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has 60 days 
from the date of this notice to file written objections along with 
supporting evidence, if any. Written objections are to be filed with 
the Office of Naval Research, ONR OOCC, Ballston Tower One, 800 North 
Quincy Street, Arlington, Virginia 22175-5660.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. R.J. Erickson, Staff Patent 
Attorney, Office of Naval Research, ONR OOCC, Ballston Tower One, 800 
North Quincy Street, Arlington, Virginia 22217-5660, telephone (703) 
696-4001.

    Dated: April 23, 1996.
M.A. Waters,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-10862 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Bernal, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J., at *Wade*hearing and trial), rendered November 17, 1987, which convicted defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of murder in the second degree and one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and sentenced him, as a predicate violent felon, to two concurrent terms of 25 years to life in prison on the murder conviction to run concurrently with a term of 7 *Vi*to 15 years on the weapon’s possession conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and an accomplice entered a candy store/newsstand at 216 Eighth Avenue in Manhattan. After forcing Raphael Pagan, a truck driver who was minding the store for the owner, to the. back of the store where a numbers betting operation was conducted, defendant shot and killed Abel Battista, the proprietor of the betting operation. Battista, who had attempted to take cover in the bathroom at the rear of the store, fired a shot out of the bathroom when defendant forced Pagan to open the bathroom door. Defendant fired into the bathroom, hitting Battista in the middle of his forehead. Pagan was shot by defendant’s accomplice who was guarding the door. Raphael Pagan’s teen-age son, Richard, was also present and witnessed some of the events.

The defendant had no absolute right to call eyewitness Richard Pagan to testify at the *Wade*hearing. *(People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 337.) In any event, the hearing court provided *363defense counsel with the opportunity to raise the *Wade*issue again, prior to Richard Pagan’s trial testimony. Counsel’s failure to do so operated as a waiver of the objection raised at the *Wade*hearing. *(People v Jones,*112 AD2d 952, 953.)

The court properly denied admission of a prior inconsistent statement made by Richard Pagan since defense counsel failed to establish the foundation necessary for the admission of such evidence. *(People v Duncan,*46 NY2d 74, 80-81.) Counsel asked the witness he sought to impeach only general questions as to whether he spoke with a Spanish police officer in uniform, and neglected to ask the witness the required specific questions as to the substance of the prior statement. *(People v Duncan, supra,*at 81.)

The other issues raised by defendant have been reviewed and determined to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 28, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00831-CV AALIYAH MARSHALL & ALL OTHER OCCUPA NTS, Appellant V. CEDAR GLEN APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-03692-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue . After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record , we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and for appellant’s br ief to be filed by Ja nuary 4, 2023. By postcard dated January 20, 2023, we inform ed appellant her br ief was overdue and directed her to file her brief within ten da ys. We cautioned appella nt that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date , appellant has not filed her brief or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding th e status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

220831F.P05 /Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

AALIYAH MARSHALL & ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant
No. 05-22-00831-CV V. CEDAR GLEN APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-03692- D. Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. Justices Reichek and Nowell participating. In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered February 28, 2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY KIMBELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District

Judge. (CA-04-270-1-JPJ)

Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Kimbell, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Kimbell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Kimbell has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of W. S.  INDUSTRIES,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James
F. Dempsey, President and Chief Executive Officer, respectively, of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 6, 2006


/s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
___________________________
    James F. Dempsey
    Chief Financial Officer
#### Joseph F. BOYER, Jr., Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Appellant.

No. 68003.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 23, 1996.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Rodney P. Massman, Sp. Assistant Attorney General, Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for Appellant.

Susman, Schermer, Rimmel & Shifrin, L.L.C., Jess W. Ullom & Joy D. McMillen, St. Louis, for Respondent.

KAROHL, Judge.

The Director of Revenue (DOR) attempts to appeal an order reinstating Joseph Boyer’s driving privileges pursuant to § 302.500 et seq. RSMo 1994.1

Boyer’s driving license was suspended as a result of allegedly driving under the influence with a blood alcohol level of .10. He requested an administrative hearing under § 302.505, which sustained the suspension. He petitioned for a trial de novo hearing under § 302.535. The case was assigned to a traffic court commissioner. The traffic *208court commissioner heard the case and found Boyer’s driving privileges should be reinstated because: (1) the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest him; and (2) Boyer did not have a blood alcohol concentration of .10 or more.

Before addressing the issues on appeal, we have an affirmative duty to determine whether we have jurisdiction. *Webster v. City of Cool Valley,*838 S.W.2d 520 (Mo.App.E.D.1992).

We find the order is without legal effect. Section 302.500 et seq. provides a comprehensive procedure to review a suspension or revocation of a driver’s license. Under § 302.535.1, the petition for trial de novo shall be filed in the circuit court, heard and decided by a circuit judge or an associate circuit judge, not a traffic court commissioner. *State of Missouri ex rel. Coyle v. O’Toole,*914 S.W.2d 871 (Mo.App.E.D.1996). Also, a traffic court commissioner is not authorized by § 479.500 to hear a driver’s license suspension or revocation trial de novo. *Id.*

Boyer’s petition remains pending in the circuit court. We remand for a hearing.

REINHARD, P.J., and CRANDALL, J, concur.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of OC Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert W. Hughes,
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  August 15, 2005


/s/ Robert W. Hughes
--------------------
Robert W. Hughes
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                   
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 19, 2010 |  | /s/ James A. McNulty                                              
|                        |  | James A. McNulty, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
or the Securities Exchange Act.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
              (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350(a) AND (b))

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,
Title 18 U.S.C. Section1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his
capacity as an officer of U.S.I. Holdings Corporation (the "Company") that the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated:  March 28, 2003                          /s/ Robert S. Schneider
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Robert S. Schneider
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

          The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.
Section1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-K to which it refers and
is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the
extent of his knowledge.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.11

First American Financial Group
140 Broadway 46th Floor
New York, New York 10005
212-248-0208

19 June 02

Mr. Charles Cardona
Chief Executive Officer
ADZONE RESEARCH
211 Roanoke Avenue
Riverhead, New York 11901

                                   TERM SHEET
                                   ----------

Dear Charles:

This communique supersedes and voids the prior Term Sheet of 12 June 02.

We are  pleased  to  inform  you that  based  on our  recent  discussions  and a
preliminary  review of the documents  submitted,  FIRST  AMERICAN  would like to
proceed with the proposed  financing  for ADZONE  RESEARCH,  INC.  [ADZR].  Said
financing will be according to the approximate following Terms and Conditions:

     Type of Financing:        Private Placement of Convertible Preferred Shares

     Amount:                   Up to US$5.0 Million

     Dividend:                 Nine percent [9%] per Annum

     Payments:                 Semi-Annually, in Arrears

     Conversion Rate:          To be agreed upon

     Conversion Terms:         To be agreed upon

     Fees:                     Per the attached Financial Services Agreement

     Miscellaneous:

     [a] Purchasers of convertible  preferred shares shall be entitled to piggy-
back registration  rights in respect to any common shares issued upon conversion
of their preferred  shares;

<PAGE>

Mr. Charles Cardona
19 June 02
Page 2



     [b] The terms of the preferred shares shall include standard  anti-dilution
provisions.

Please  indicate  if the above Terms and  Conditions  are  acceptable  to you by
signing a copy of this letter and returning it to us,  together with an executed
Financial Services Agreement, at your earliest convenience. Upon receipt of same
we will  advise  you of any  additional  documents  we will  need so that we may
proceed.

Yours Truly,

S/ William J. Rogers, Jr.
-------------------------
Managing Director

                                               AGREED:
                                               -------
                                               ADZONE RESEARCH, INC.

                                               S/ Charles Cardona
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer, Chairman