alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christine Kilbourn, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intelbahn Inc. for
      the period ended January 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Intelbahn Inc.                                                                     

Dated: March 17, 2009



| | /s/
      Christine Kilbourn                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Christine Kilbourn                                             
| | President, Treasurer and Director                              
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Intelbahn Inc.                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Intelbahn Inc. and will be retained by Intelbahn Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Fog, Inc. a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
      September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      “Report”), I, Tom Bontems, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





*/s/
                Tom Bontems*Tom
                BontemsChief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                November 12, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of VisualMED Clinical Solutions Corp (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Kurlender, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/
          Larry Kurlender
| | -----------------------------
| | Name:                        
| | Title:                       

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2253-2254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1118]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP91-56-007]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

January 19, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 17, 1996, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2, 
proposed revised tariff sheets to become effective January 17, 1996.
    Williston Basin states that, in accordance with Subsection 37.2.1 
of the General Terms and Conditions of Williston Basin's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, and the Company's Annual Take-or-
Pay 

[[Page 2254]]
Reconciliation Filing in Docket No. TM95-3-49-000, filed May 31, 1995, 
the revised tariff sheets are being filed to reflect the elimination of 
the Docket No. RP91-56-000 throughput surcharge effective January 17, 
1996.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1118 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10801]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial 
Innovation; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and 
Industrial Innovation (<SUP>#1194).
    Date and Time: May 22, 1996, 8:30 a.m.--5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 365, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mr. Darryl Gorman, SBIR Program Manager, (703) 
306-1391, Dr. Frank Wodarczyk, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 
Chemistry Division, Program Manager, (730) 306-1856, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate SBIR/STTR Chemistry Phase II 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 USC 552b (c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 26, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-10801 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Deborah A. HELLEBUSCH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF WENTZVILLE, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 66560.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 11, 1995.

Lawrence L. Pratt, St. Louis, for appellant.

Robert M. Wohler, O’Fallon, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and AHRENS, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, formerly a police dispatcher for the City of Wentzville, appeals from the circuit court’s dismissal of her *“Petition For Review"*of the City’s Board of Aldermen’s imposition of a three-day suspension without pay and six-month work-probation. We affirm. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5127 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5127

 To reduce appointment wait times for certain nonimmigrant visas known 
               as visitor visas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2023

   Ms. Salazar (for herself, Mrs. Lee of Nevada, Mrs. Miller of West 
Virginia, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Swalwell, Ms. Titus, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
Kim of New Jersey, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mrs. Radewagen, Ms. Tokuda, 
 Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Ryan, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Mr. Case, Mr. Carson, Mr. 
 Trone, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mrs. Gonzalez-Colon, 
  Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Ms. Mace, Mr. Webster of Florida, Ms. 
    Wasserman Schultz, and Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reduce appointment wait times for certain nonimmigrant visas known 
               as visitor visas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Visitor Visa Wait Time Reduction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT AND REASSIGNMENT OF PERSONNEL FOR EXCESSIVE VISITOR VISA 
              WAIT TIMES.

    (a) Report Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report that includes--
            (1) a list of each diplomatic and consular post at which 
        the average waiting period, beginning on the date an individual 
        submits an application for a nonimmigrant visa under section 
        101(a)(15)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
        1101) (commonly referred to as a ``visitor visa'') and the date 
        such individual is granted an interview for such a visa, 
        exceeds 100 days; and
            (2) an explanation of the concrete steps taken at each such 
        post in order to reduce such average waiting period.
    (b) Reassignment of Personnel.--With respect to any diplomatic or 
consular posts at which the average waiting period described in 
subsection (a)(1) exceeds 300 days, the Secretary of State shall, as 
appropriate, temporarily reassign appropriate personnel of the 
Department of State to directly assist consular staff at such posts in 
order to reduce such average waiting period.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas Edward JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40527.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 22, 1988.

Melinda K. Pendergraph, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SHANGLER, P.J., and CLARK and NUGENT, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial, after evidentiary hearing, of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 84.-16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, Anthony Coletti, Chief Accounting Officer of Trafalgar Resources, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period December 31, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|   | By: /s/ Anthony Coletti |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | ----------------------------------- |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

|   | Anthony Coletti |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Chief Accounting Officer |
|--------|--------------------------|

 

February 19, 2008

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trafalgar Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Trafalgar Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
Michael W. Overby, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Triton
Distribution Systems, Inc.








Date: August 15,
      2008
            By: 
      /s/ Michael W.
      Overby
              Michael
      W. Overby
              Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


United States International Trade Commission

[USITC SE-95-02]

TIME AND DATE: January 24, 1995 at 2:30 p.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS:

1. Agenda for future meeting
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. No. 731-TA-677 (Final) (Coumarin from the People's Republic 
of China)--briefing and vote.
5. Outstanding action jackets: None

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: January 9, 1995.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-856 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

September 9, 2003 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HOLLY FANT

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County

No. 16030 Clayburn Peeples, II, Judge

No. W2003-00211-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 14, 2004

GARY R. WADE, P.J., concurring.

I agree that the defendant’s sentence should be affirmed. In my view, however, it was error

for the trial court to apply enhancement factor (6), that the defendant treated the victim with

exceptional cruelty. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(6). Application of this factor requires a

finding of cruelty over and above that inherently attendant to the crime for which the defendant is

convicted. State v. Embry, 915 S.W.2d 451, 456 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). In other words, such

evidence must “denote[ ] the infliction of pain or suffering for its own sake or from the gratification

derived therefrom, and not merely pain or suffering inflicted as the means of accomplishing the

crime charged.” State v. Kelly Haynes, No. W1999-01485-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App., at

Jackson, Mar. 14, 2000). Enhancement factor (6) has typically been applied in situations where the

victim was tortured or abused. See State v. Davis, 825 S.W.2d 109, 113 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991).

This court has upheld the application of this factor based on proof of extensive physical abuse or

torture, see State v. Williams, 920 S.W.2d 247, 259 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995), as well as proof of

psychological abuse or torture, see State v. Thomas Lebron Mills and Carl Franklin Mills, No. 936

(Tenn. Crim. App., at Knoxville, Dec. 19, 1985) (holding that acts of mental cruelty, by themselves,

can be as vicious and scarring as acts of physical cruelty). Here, there is no evidence that the

defendant tortured or abused the victim or that she inflicted pain and suffering greater than that

necessary to complete the offense. Rather, after shooting the victim, the defendant dialed 911 and

waited with him until emergency assistance arrived. Nevertheless, I concur with the majority that

the four-year sentence, one year above the minimum, was warranted.

_______________________________________

GARY R. WADE, PRESIDING JUDGE
EXHIBIT 4.64

                   OPTION AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 2003,
               BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND CLOUDBREAK RESOURCES LTD.



<PAGE>


                            CLOUDBREAK RESOURCES LTD.

BRUCE BRAGAGNOLO
Direct Phone No. (604) 642-5180
Direct Fax No. (604) 642-5189
Email:bruce@boxlaw.com

BY CURRIER

September 22, 2003

IMA EXPLORATION INC.
Suite 709 - 837 West Hastings Street
Terminal City Club Tower
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6C 3N6

Attention: Joseph Grosso, President:

Dear Sirs:

Re:      Gollete Property

Further to our  correspondence  we now enclose herewith our revised proposal for
the option by  Cloudbreak  Resources  Ltd.  for the  acquisition  of the Gollete
Property in San Juan Province, Patagonia.

We confirm that the terms of the  proposal are the payment of 500,000  shares on
Exchange acceptance and 350,000 on October 1, 2004; and exploration expenditures
of US$ 1,000,000 over three years with US$150,000 being spent in the first year,
US$350,000 in the second year and  US$500,000 in the third year in order to earn
an initial 50%  interest.  There will be the option to increase to 75% by making
additional  exploration  expenditures of US$1,000,000 in year 4; US$1,500,000 in
year 5; issuing 1,000,000 shares;  and, providing a comprehensive  report on the
results of the work performed up to the date of the report. Cloudbrake will also
pay to IMA amounts to cover fees,  taxes and vendor payments due on the Property
to maintain the Property in good standing.

We trust the above terms meet with your  approval and look forward to receipt of
your response at your earliest convenience.

Yours Truly,                      Terms accepted this 22nd day of September 2003


CLOUDBREAK RESOURCES LTD.           IMA EXPLORATION INC.
Per:                                Per:


/s/ BRUCE BRAGAGNOLO

Bruce Bragagnolo                     /s/ JOSEPH GROSSO
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Joseph Grosso, President & C.E.O.



  Suite 602- 570 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 3P1
                 Telephone: 604-642-5180 Facsimile: 604-642-5189
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4424

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RAVON HEBRON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-

cr-00363-AMD-1) 

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Marc L. Resnick, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. 

Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Christopher J. Romano, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Ravon Hebron pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to 

distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine base, 

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). He was sentenced to 120 

months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Hebron argues that he was 

deprived of a fair trial because he entered his guilty plea 

involuntarily, without proper advice from counsel, and under 

coercion and duress. We affirm. 

 To the extent Hebron claims his guilty plea was 

involuntary and the district court erred in accepting it, any 

error committed during the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing is 

reviewed for plain error because Hebron did not move to withdraw 

his guilty plea. See United States v. Martinez, 277 F.3d 517, 

524-26 (4th Cir. 2002). We have carefully reviewed the 

transcript of the Rule 11 hearing and find no plain error in the 

district court’s acceptance of the guilty plea. See United 

States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 119—20 (4th Cir. 1991). A 

defendant’s statements at a guilty plea hearing are presumed 

true. See Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 73-74 (1977). 

Unsupported subsequent allegations are insufficient to overcome 

representations at the hearing. Id. at 74. We find no 

evidence that Hebron’s plea was not knowing or voluntary. See

Unites States v. Marin, 961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir. 1992). 

Moreover, as there is no ineffective assistance of counsel found 

2 
3 

on the face of the record, we decline to consider Hebron’s 

ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal. DeFusco, 949 

F.2d at 120-21. 

 Accordingly, we affirm Hebron’s conviction and 

sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John L. Anhorn, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and result of operations of the Company
for the period certified.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: March 14, 2008 | /s/ JOHN L. ANHORNJohn L. Anhorn 
	Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

---