alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

I, Terry G.Roussel, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofCornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; and

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report.

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)           designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)           evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this reported our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

(a)           allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
|                          | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November  10, 2006 | Terry G. Roussel                                       |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

 

----
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement - Bluehill ID AG and John Rogers



 Exhibit 10.39 

Amendment No. 1 to the 

Employment Agreement 

between 

Bluehill ID AG 

and 

Mr. John Rogers 

The Parties hereto have agreed to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 

 

	 	1.	As of 1 April 2010 the Base Salary as defined in Article 3.1 of the Employment Agreement shall amount to CHF 175’000 per annum. 


 

	 	2.	All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


 

							
	Jongny, 16 March 2010	 		 	St. Gallen, 16 March 2010
			
		 		 	Bluehill ID AG
			
	 /s/ John Rogers
	 		 	 /s / Ayman S. Ashour

	John Rogers	 		 	By:	 	Ayman S. Ashour
		 		 	Title:	 	President of the Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Stone Field Management  Company
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements Nos. 333-128632 and 333-128630 on Form S-8 of TRX, Inc. and subsidiaries (“TRX”) of our report dated February 20, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, effective January 1, 2006) relating to the consolidated financial statements of TRX, appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of TRX for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

February 20, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *563William Thomas, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered May 22, 1987, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual report of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Kim Boyce, President and director, and Kevin Cooksy, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date:April 17, 2007By:/s/Kim BoyceKim Boyce, President and Director  Date:April 17, 2007By:/s/Kevin CooksyKevin Cooksy, Secretary/Treasurer
#### STATE of Missouri Respondent, v. Raymond Joe SUTTON, Appellant.

No. 60932.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 20, 1992.

Cynthia M. Howlett, Shaw, Howlett & Knappenberger, Clayton, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(4). We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.1



                  Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection  with the filing by Assure Data,  Inc. (the "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  June 30,  2007 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial respects,  the financial
                  condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                       Date:  August 8, 2007

                                        /s/  Robert Lisle
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Lisle, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2004 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I,Carl E. Dodson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date:  August 16, 2004 | /s/ Carl E. Dodson                                   |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Carl E. Dodson                                       |
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Baldwin, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered February 6, 1987, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

. In a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment, the defendant argued that he had been deprived of his right to a speedy trial. This part of the defendant’s motion was based on statutory provisions (CPL 30.30) as well as constitutional provisions (US Const 6th, 14th Amends; CPL 30.20; *Klopfer v North Carolina,*386 US 213). In order to induce the People to agree to the proposed plea bargain, the defendant expressly agreed to waive appellate review of both his statutory and his constitutional speedy trial arguments.

With respect to his claim that his statutory speedy trial rights were violated, the defendant’s express waiver was redundant, since his plea of guilty operated as an automatic forfeiture of his right to appellate review of this issue *(see, People v O’Brien,*56 NY2d 1009, 1010; *People v Gooden,*151 AD2d 773; *People v Green,*146 AD2d 281, 283, n 2, *affd*75 NY2d 902; *People v Coombs,*138 AD2d 619, 620; *People v Boyd,*133 AD2d 641, 642; *People v James,*125 AD2d 412). While a constitutional speedy trial claim is not similarly subject to an automatic forfeiture, it may be the subject of an express waiver *(see, People v Rodriguez,*50 NY2d 553, 557; *People v Gooden, supra,*at 774; *People v Harris,*103 AD2d 891; *People v Galante,*91 AD2d 690). There was no duress exerted in this case and the defendant’s waiver was voluntary, so that the exception to this general rule reflected in cases such as *People v Blakley*(34 NY2d 311) and *People v White*(32 NY2d 393) does not apply *(see, People v Gooden, supra,*at 774; *cf., People v Green,*146 AD2d 281, 283, *supra).*The waiver should therefore be enforced.

*604We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          52,697
<SECURITIES>                                    11,027
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,499
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         645,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 942,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,899
<BONDS>                                        599,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                     234,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   942,974
<SALES>                                         38,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,176
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,569
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,475
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    328
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,766
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES INCOME TRUST


 


Summary of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a
summary of the currently effective compensation of the trustees of Government
Properties Income Trust (the “Company”) for services as trustees, which is subject
to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.


 


·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an
annual fee of $30,000, plus a fee of $750 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $750 fees are payable if a board
meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date.


 


·                  The chairpersons of the Audit Committee,
the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, each of
whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $9,000, $4,500
and $4,500, respectively.


 


·                  Each trustee is entitled to receive a
grant of 1,500 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the
date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders
(or, for trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day
of the first board meeting attended).


 


·                  The Company generally reimburses all
trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as
trustees.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 1908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1045]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

National Assessment Governing Board; Public Forum

AGENCY: National Assessment Governing Board; Education.

ACTION: Amendment to notice of information collection activity.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amends the notice of an information collection activity 
of the National Assessment Governing Board published in Vol. 60, No. 
240, Page 65642.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Cooper Loomis, NAEP ALS Project 
Director, American College Testing, 2201 North Dodge Street, Iowa City, 
Iowa 52243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

II. Request for Comments

    NAGB solicits comments to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility.
    (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the burden 
of the proposed collection of information.
    (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
to be collected.
    (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated 
or electronic collection technologies of other forms of information 
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: January 19, 1996.
Roy Truby,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 96-1045 Filed 1-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134134 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134134 COA: 266082 Wayne CC: 05-001206-01 JULIAN TIMOTHY BROOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18569-18570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10389]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and 
Draft Management Plan for the Proposed Mullica River-Great Bay National 
Estuarine Research Reserve in New Jersey

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal 
Resource Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Public hearing notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Sanctuaries and Reserves 
Division, of the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 
(OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce, will hold public 
hearings for the purpose of receiving comments on the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Management Plan (DEIS/DMP) 
prepared on the proposed designation of the Mullica River-Great Bay 
National Estuarine Research Reserve in New Jersey. The DEIS/DMP address 
research, monitoring, education and resource protection needs for the 
proposed reserve.
    The Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management will hold 
public hearings at 3:00 p.m. and at 7:00 p.m. on Friday, May 31, 1996, 
at the Rutgers University Marine Field Station Dorm, 132 Great Bay 
Boulevard, Tuckerton, New Jersey 08087.
    The views of interested persons and organizations on the adequacy 
of the DEIS/DMP are solicited, and may be expressed orally and/or in 
written statements. Presentations will be scheduled on a first-come, 
first-heard basis, and may be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes. 
The time allotment may be extended before the hearing when the number 
of speakers can be determined. All comments received at the hearing 
will be considered in the preparation of the Final Environmental Impact 
Statement (FEIS) and Draft Management Plan.

[[Page 18570]]

    The comment period for the DEIS/DMP will end on Monday, June 10, 
1996. All written comments received by this deadline will be considered 
in the preparation of the FEIS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Dolores A. Washington (301) 713-3132, Sanctuaries and Reserves 
Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National 
Ocean Service, NOAA, 1305 East West Highway, SSMC4, 12th Floor, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910. Copies of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
Draft Management Plan are available upon request to the Sanctuaries and 
Reserves Division.

    Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.420.
    Coastal Zone Management Estuarine Sanctuaries.

    Dated: April 19, 1996.
W. Stanley Wilson,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 96-10389 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23
                                                              Form 10-K for 1996
                                                                File No. 1-11237

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
AT&T Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 (File No. 33-18367) of
our reports dated March 6, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of AT&T Capital Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York
March 18, 1997

                                        1





<PAGE>
#### Jamal A. WILLIAMS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63964.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 2, 1993.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for movant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jamal A. Williams, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion. The trial court dismissed his motion as untimely. *See*Rule 24.035(b).

The order of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The order of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).