alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SINOCUBATE, INC.





/s/ Tom Simeo

Date: April 15, 2011Tom Simeo

Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,

Director and Secretary
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7996

MARK A. JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS MCBRIDE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-03-53-3) Submitted: May 18, 2005 Decided: June 3, 2005 Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Jon Rufus Blevins, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mark A. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Johnson’s motion to amend his brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31(b)****CERTIFICATIONS****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, David C. Stuebe, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) of Alpha NaturalResources, Inc. (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this Report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis Report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     /s/ David C. Stuebe        David C. Stuebe  *Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Infrastructure Investment
      Corporation (the “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      U.S.
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            */s/
              Li Xipeng*Name:Li
                XipengTitle:Chief
                Executive Officer, Principal Executive
              Officer
                and Chairman of the Board




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to China Infrastructure Investment Corporation
      will be retained by China Infrastructure Investment Corporation and furnished
      to
      the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Annual Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of TDL
Infomedia Group plc (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), Linda
Pancratz, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Kevin Watson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 23, 2004

                                Signature: 	/s/ LM Pancratz
                                Name:		Linda pancratz
                                Title:		CEO

                                Signature:	/s/ KJ Watson
                                Name:		Kevin Watson
                                Title:		CFO

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and is not filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate
disclosure document.
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-24-00080-CR

LANDON PAUL WHITTEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23-0167X

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Landon Paul Whitten filed an untimely notice of appeal from his conviction for

possessing a controlled substance and the resulting sentence of twenty months’ confinement in 

state jail.

1 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The judgment of conviction in this matter indicates that Whitten’s sentence was imposed 

on March 13, 2024, and Whitten did not file a motion for new trial. As a result, Whitten’s notice 

of appeal was due thirty days from the date sentence was imposed, or on or before April 12, 

2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Whitten’s notice of appeal was filed on April 18, 2024,

which is beyond the April 12 deadline. The notice of appeal, therefore, was untimely.

We notified Whitten by letter that his notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that 

the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. We gave Whitten ten days to 

respond to our letter and demonstrate how we had jurisdiction over the appeal notwithstanding 

the noted defect. Whitten responded by filing a motion to extend the deadline for filing his 

notice of appeal.

Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establishes the procedure for 

obtaining an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal. Under Rule 26.3, an appellate 

court has the discretion to grant an extension of time in a criminal matter if, and only if, within 

fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the appellant (1) files the notice of 

appeal in the trial court and (2) files a motion seeking an extension of time in the appellate court. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. While Whitten satisfied the first requirement, he failed to satisfy the 

1See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b) (Supp.). 
3

second. Whitten did file a motion in this Court seeking an extension of the deadline for filing his 

notice of appeal, but he did not do so within fifteen days after the deadline for filing such notice. 

As previously stated, the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was April 12, 2024, making 

April 29, 2024, the deadline for filing a motion for an extension of time under Rule 26.3. 

Whitten’s motion was filed in this Court on May 2, 2024, making it untimely. The Texas Court 

of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that the failure to timely file a motion for extension of 

time under such circumstances deprives this Court of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 

S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209 n.3 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam).

Because Whitten has not timely perfected his appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Charles van Cleef

Justice

Date Submitted: May 15, 2024

Date Decided: May 16, 2024

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-167463), Form S-8 (No. 333-123124), Form S-8 (No. 333-141495), Form S-8 (No. 333-158677), Form S-3 (No. 333-142779), Form S-3 (No. 333-142884), Form S-3 (No. 333-151330), Form S-3 (No. 333-155392), and Form S-3 (No. 333-159649) of Raser Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 15, 2011, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Raser Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP.




Denver, Colorado


April 15, 2011
EXHIBIT 10.5(A)



 Exhibit 10.5(a) 
 Amendment to Agreement 
 for Compensation on Discharge Subsequent 
 to a Change in Control 
 Amendment, dated as
of December 22, 2005, to the Agreement for Compensation on Discharge Subsequent to a Change in Control (the “Agreement”), between People’s Bank (the “Bank”) and
             (the “Officer”). Capitalized terms that are not specifically defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to those terms in the Agreement. 
 1. Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended by deleting the phrase “through December 31, 2005” contained therein and inserting in
lieu thereof the phrase “through December 31, 2006.” 
 This Amendment is made supplemental to, and a part of, the Agreement
and, except as expressly amended or modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. All references to “this Agreement” in the Agreement shall be a reference to the Agreement as amended hereby. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date written above. 
  

			
	  

	 [Officer]

	
	 PEOPLE’S BANK

		
	 By:
	 	  

		 	 [Officer]
 Executive Vice
President
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition and results of the Company as of
and for the period covered by this Report.
 By:
    /s/ William J. McGurkWilliam J. McGurkPresident and Chief Executive
Officer November 14, 2006By:
    /s/ Gregory A. WhiteGregory A. WhiteSVP, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer November 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF STATION CASINOS, INC.

|Nevada Corporations                
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|Palace Station Hotel & Casino, Inc.
|Boulder Station, Inc.              
|Texas Station, LLC                 
|Sunset Station, Inc.               
|Santa Fe Station, Inc.             
|Fiesta Station, Inc.               
|Rancho Station, LLC                
|Lake Mead Station, Inc.            
|Tropicana Station, Inc.            
|Palm Station, LLC                  
|                                   
|Green Valley Station, Inc.:        
|                                   
|                                   
|GV Ranch Station, Inc.:            
|                                   
|Durango Station, Inc.              
|                                   
|Station Holdings, Inc.:            
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|Vista Holdings, LLC                
|Centerline Holdings, LLC           
|Charleston Station, Inc.           
|Station Online, Inc.               
|Station Technology, LLC            

---

QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Hambrite, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered December 19, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Hooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2


                    Certification of Interim CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GAMCO Investors, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John C.
Ferrara, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


 /s/ John C. Ferrara
--------------------------------------
Name:  John C. Ferrara
Title: Interim Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 10, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Terry G. Roussel and SharonC. Kaiser, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone Core PropertiesREIT, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30,2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of  Cornerstone CoreProperties REIT, Inc.

 

 
|                               |  /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                              |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 11, 2005 | Terry G. Roussel  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                               |                                                                    |
|                               |                                                                    |
|                               | /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                                    |
| Date:  November 11, 2005 | Sharon C. Kaiser  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the undersigned officers and/or directors of USI HoldingsCorporation, a Delaware corporation, do and each of them does, hereby constitute and appoint DavidL. Eslick and Robert S. Schneider, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each ofthem with full power to act without the others, for him and in his name, place and stead, to signthe USI Holdings Corporation Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and any and all futureamendments thereto; and to file said Form 10-K and any such amendments with all exhibits thereto,and any and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any ofthem, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.     **Signature** **Title** **Date**     /s/David L. Eslick **David L. Eslick** Chairman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer (PrincipalExecutive Officer) andDirector March 1, 2007     /s/ Robert S. Schneider **Robert S. Schneider** Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11064]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-214-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

April 29, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 24, 1996, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A 
attached to the filing, proposed to be effective May 25, 1996.
    Panhandle asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's orders issued September 28, 1995 and February 29, 1996 
in Docket No. RM95-3-000.
    Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing is to bring it 
FERC Gas Tariff into compliance with the Commission's updated 
Regulations as set forth in Order No. 582 (Final Rule) and Order No. 
582-A (Final Rule; Order on Rehearing) issued September 28, 1995 and 
February 29, 1996 respectively, in Docket No. RM95-3-000, Filing and 
Reporting Requirements for Interstate Natural Gas Company Rate 
Schedules and Tariffs. Specifically, Panhandle is: (1) Adding its 
telephone and facsimile numbers, as well as street address on the title 
page; (2) expanding the table of contents to include individual 
sections of the General Terms and Conditions and the table of contents 
for Original Volume No. 2; (3) providing an updated system map showing 
zone boundaries and a separate map for each zone; (4) rearranging rate 
sheet components to show adjustments approved pursuant to Subpart E of 
the Regulations in a separate column; (5) including a statement 
describing the order in which Panhandle discounts its rates; and (6) 
updating references to Part 154 of the Regulations.
    Panhandle states that a copy of this filing is being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11064 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00346

- CR

M IGUEL D WAYNE H OBDY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1496599D)

August 8, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is af firmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack