alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19256-19257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10717]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Alabama Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Alabama Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on May 16, 1996, at the Sumter County 
Courthouse, Courthouse Square, Livingston, Alabama 35470. The purpose 
of the

[[Page 19257]]

meeting is to receive a briefing on race relations issues in western 
Alabama.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, April 23, 1996.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-10717 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 2 2005 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

v. GREAT PLAINS COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee,

------------------------- MARIA SCOTZIN; KENDRA WHITNEY; LORI CRAWFORD; ROBYN GILLILAND; MARISSA SOCKWELL; BRIDGETT GREENE; Intervenors, STEVA BOWERS, Applicant in Intervention - Appellant. No. 04-6001 (D.C. No. 03-CV-1347-F) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *-2-

Before LUCERO , McKAY , and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Steva Bowers appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to intervene in a Title VII action against Great Plain s Coca-Cola Bottling Company. The district court denied Ms. Bowers’ motion becaus e it determined that her claims were barred by the applicable statute of lim itations. Ms. Bowers argues that the district court erred because the Oklahoma Savings Statute is applicable to claims brought under Title VII. Alternatively, Ms. Bowers asserts that the district court erred by not equitably tolling her claims. W e review de novo the district court’s legal determination that the Oklahoma Savin gs Statute is not applicable to Title VII claims. See City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co. , 72 F.3d 1491, 1495 (10th Cir. 1996). We review for abuse of disc retion the district court’s decision that Ms. Bowers’ claims should not be equitably tolled. Garrett v. Fleming , 362 F.3d 692, 695 (10th Cir. 2004). Having reviewed the briefs, the record and the appl icable law, we conclude that the district court correctly decided this case . We therefore AFFIRM the-3-

judgment for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its Order filed November 14, 2003. Entered for the Court Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00522-CR

Michael Manahan, Jr.

On Appeal from the

130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-164

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 19, 2014
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO						18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,						AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO						SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lodge Bay Oil & Gas Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:  March 12, 2008                                                      /s/ Barry Swanson                                                                                                                          Barry Swanson				                                                                                            President, CEO, CFO, Secretary,				                                                                                            Treasurer and Director (Principal				                                                                                            Executive Officer and Principal				                                                                                            Financial Officer)

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James R. DOUGHERTY, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 66286.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.

Dec. 13, 1994.

David H. Ash, Mcllroy & Millan, Bowling Green, for appellant.

Mark S. Fisher, Bowling Green, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and AHRENS and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury in the Circuit Court of Pike County for resisting arrest by using or threatening to use violence or physical force, a Class A misdemeanor, § 575.150 RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant to a term of one year in county jail.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of China Infrastructure Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.             The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.             The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.




Date:          
May 14, 2010





/s/   Li
      XipengName:
      Li XipengTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer
                Chairman
      of the Board





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Watts, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), imposed March 4,1987.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The fact that the defendant tested positive for “HIV infection” is not, in and of itself, a ground for reducing the otherwise appropriate and bargained-for sentence which was imposed *(see, People v Napolitano,*138 AD2d 414; *People v Parker,*132 AD2d 629; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Any application by the defendant to *568ameliorate the conditions under which he is incarcerated should be made to the New York State Department of Correctional Services.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find nothing which would warrant interfering with the sentencing court’s proper exercise of discretion *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, *supra).*Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19957-19958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10987]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collections Being Reviewed by the 
Agency for International Development, Proposed Collections; Comments 
Requested Correction

AGENCY: Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Correcting form number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains correction of form number to the 
Proposed Collections; Comments Requested for Private Voluntary 
Organization Annual Return, which was

[[Page 19958]]

published on Wednesday, April 10, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 23, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Mary Ann Ball, Bureau for 
Management, Office of Administrative Services, Information Support 
Services Division, Agency for International Development, Room B930, 
NS., Washington, DC, (202) 736-4743 or via e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cf828e8daea3a38f9a9c8e868be1888099e1">[email protected]</a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Accordingly, form number is corrected as 
follows:

Form No.: AID 1550-2 (1/96).

    Dated: April 22, 1996.
Genease E. Pettigrew,
Chief, Information Support Services Division, Office of Administrative 
Services, Bureau of Management.
[FR Doc. 96-10987 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5637 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to authorize 

the Secretary of Agriculture to authorize the use of certain grants to 

deliver peer-to-peer mental health support to individuals who are engaged 

in farming, ranching, farm work, and other occupations relating to agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. HARDER of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to authorize 

the use of certain grants to deliver peer-to-peer mental 

health support to individuals who are engaged in farming, ranching, farm work, and other occupations relating 

to agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Farm5 worker Mental Health Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5637 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds that farmworkers— 

3 (1) are vital to the economy and food supply of 

4 the United States; and 

5 (2) who are disproportionately affected by 

6 stress and anxiety, often lack access to behavioral 

7 health care services. 

8 SEC. 3. FARM AND RANCH STRESS ASSISTANCE NETWORK. 

9 Section 7522 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy 

10 Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 5936) is amended— 

11 (1) by inserting ‘‘farm work,’’ after ‘‘ranching,’’ 

12 each place it appears; 

13 (2) in subsection (b)— 

14 (A) in paragraph (1)(D), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

15 at the end; 

16 (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as 

17 paragraph (3); 

18 (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

19 following: 

20 ‘‘(2) to initiate, expand, or sustain programs 

21 that deliver peer-to-peer mental health support to in22 dividuals who are engaged in farming, ranching, 

23 farm work, and other occupations relating to agri24 culture; or’’; and 

25 (D) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated), 

26 by striking ‘‘paragraph (1) and subsection (a)’’ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5637 IH

1 and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (2) and sub2 section (a)’’; and 

3 (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5390 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the feasibility 

of manufacturing in the United States products for critical infrastructure 

sectors, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023 

Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS (for herself, Mr. BUCSHON, Ms. SPANBERGER, Ms. 

KUSTER, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, and Ms. SCHRIER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study 

on the feasibility of manufacturing in the United States 

products for critical infrastructure sectors, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Infrastructure 

5 Manufacturing Feasibility Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5390 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY ON CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANUFAC2 TURING IN THE UNITED STATES. 

3 (a) STUDY.—Not later than 1 year after the date of 

4 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce 

5 shall conduct a study to— 

6 (1) identify, within each critical infrastructure 

7 sector, any product that is in high demand and is 

8 being imported due to a manufacturing, material, or 

9 supply chain constraint in the United States; 

10 (2) analyze the costs and benefits of manufac11 turing in the United States any product identified 

12 under paragraph (1), including any effects on— 

13 (A) jobs, employment rates, and labor con14 ditions in the United States; and 

15 (B) the cost of the product; 

16 (3) identify any product identified under para17 graph (1) that feasibly may be manufactured in the 

18 United States; and 

19 (4) analyze the feasibility of, and any impedi20 ments to, manufacturing any product identified 

21 under paragraph (3) in— 

22 (A) a rural area; 

23 (B) an industrial park; or 

24 (C) an industrial park in a rural area. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5390 IH

1 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 18 

2 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

3 Secretary shall— 

4 (1) submit to Congress a report containing the 

5 results of the study required by subsection (a), with 

6 recommendations relating to manufacturing in the 

7 United States products identified under subsection 

8 (a)(3); and 

9 (2) make the report available to the public on 

10 the website of the Department of Commerce. 

11 (c) LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY.—This section may 

12 not be construed to provide the Secretary of Commerce 

13 with authority to compel a person to provide information 

14 described in this section. 

15 (d) DEFINITION OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

16 SECTOR.—In this section, the term ‘‘critical infrastructure 

17 sector’’ means each of the 16 designated critical infra18 structure sectors identified in Presidential Policy Directive 

19 21 of February 12, 2013 (Critical Infrastructure Security 

20 and Resilience). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 10, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1526

Lower Tribunal No. F16-3726

________________

Tyrese Johnson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.

Tyrese Johnson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10684]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Receipt of Petition for Federal Acknowledgment of Existence as an 
Indian Tribe

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.9(a) (formerly 25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is 
hereby given that the Montauk Indian Nation, 1052 Hempstead St., Sag 
Harbor, New York 11963, has filed a petition for acknowledgment by the 
Secretary of the Interior that the group exists as an Indian tribe. The 
petition was received by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on July 31, 
1995, and was signed by members of the group's governing body.
    This is a notice of receipt of petition and does not constitute 
notice that the petition is under active consideration. Notice of 
active consideration will be sent by mail to the petitioner and other 
interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Section 83.9(a) (formerly 54.8(d)) of the Federal 
regulations, interested parties may submit factual and/or legal 
arguments in support of or in opposition to the group's petition. Any 
information submitted will be made available on the same basis as other 
information in the BIA's files. Such submissions will be provided to 
the petitioner upon receipt by the BIA. The petitioner will be provided 
an opportunity to respond to such submissions prior to a final 
determination regarding the petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 1362-MIB, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: April 4, 1996.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-10684 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Odell Allen, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered January 11, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738) in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the motion is granted, Edwin L. Butterfield of 185 Hillside Avenue, Williston Park, New York, is relieved as attorney for the defendant and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Florence Kerner of P.O. Box 601, Huntington, New York, 11743, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the People are directed to furnish a copy of the stenographic minutes to the new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the defendant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order and the People shall serve and file their brief within 120 days of the date of this decision and order; by prior decision and order of this court, the defendant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers (including the typewritten stenographic minutes) and on the typewritten briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

Based upon this court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that arguable issues exist with respect, *inter alia,*to the defendant’s claim that the sentence imposed is excessive. Under the circumstances, the motion of the defendant’s assigned counsel to be relieved as counsel is granted and new appellate counsel is assigned *(see, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606; *People v Casiano,*67 NY2d 906; *People v Miller,*99 AD2d 1021). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6033

CHARLES M. ANDERSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE DEEDS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1145-AM) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles M. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles M. Anderson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Deeds , No. CA-97-1145-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 99.13

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CompassLearning, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned in his
capacity as an officer of CompassLearning, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

  (3) Based on the officer's knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and

  (4) Based on the officer's knowledge, the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition, result of operations and cash flows of CompassLearning,
      Inc. for the periods presented in the report.



/s/ Martin E. Kenney, Jr.

-------------------------------------------------
Martin E. Kenney, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Robert S. Lynch

-------------------------------------------------
Robert S. Lynch
Treasurer  and
Principal Financial Officer