alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9843]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Care Financing Administration
[OFHR-001-N]


New Address and Telephone Numbers of the Office of Acquisition 
and Grants, Office of Financial and Human Resources

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the new address and telephone numbers of 
the primary staff of the Office of Acquisition and Grants, Office of 
Financial and Human Resources, Health Care Financing Administration. 
HCFA's Office of Acquisition and Grants (OAG) will relocate at Central 
2-21-15, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Mikesell, (410) 966-8090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of the new telephone 
numbers and locations for some of the primary OAG staff:

Director, Office of Acquisition and Grants, Ellen L. Angus, Central 2-
22-08 (410) 786-9280.
Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization Specialist, Fred Suggs, 
Central 2-21-23 (410) 786-5132.
Acquisition Policy Team Leader, Debbie Powell, Central 2-23-15 (410) 
786-3077.
Grants Policy Officer, Charles A. Johnson, Central 2-22-07 (410) 786-
6256.
Director, Research Contracts and Grants Division, Marian D. Webb, 
Central 2-18-03 (410) 786-5161.
Director, ADP, Telecommunications and Services Division, Edward Hodges, 
Central 2-19-07 (410) 786-5131.
Director, Planning and Health Services Contracts Division, Glennda 
Moragne El, Central 2-23-17 (410) 786-5128.

    Only the prefix 966 of the existing telephone numbers of OAG staff 
will be changed when OAG moves to the new HCFA site. The new prefix is 
786. Persons wishing to contact OAG personnel not shown on the list 
above may still do so on or after May 22 by adding the new 786 prefix 
to the last 4 existing digits of the old telephone number, e.g., the 
old 966-1234 telephone number will become the new 786-1234 telephone 
number. Inquiries regarding the location or telephone numbers of OAG 
staff may be directed to (410) 966-9280.

    Dated: April 6, 1995.
Ellen L. Angus,
Director, Office of Acquisition and Grants, Office of Financial and 
Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 95-9843 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10696]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-29; OTS No. 3481]


Prestige Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 22, 1996, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Prestige Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to 
convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and 
the Northeast Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 10 
Exchange Place, 18th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302.

    Dated: April 25, 1996.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10696 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9394]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE


The Federal Register Online via GPO Access; Public Meeting for 
Federal, State and Local Agencies, and Others Interested in a 
Demonstration of GPO Access, the Online Service Providing the Federal 
Register and Other Federal Databases

    The Superintendent of Documents will hold a public meeting for 
Federal, state and local government agencies, and others interested in 
an overview and demonstration of the Government Printing Office's 
online service GPO Access, provided under the Government Printing 
Office Electronic Information Access Enhancement Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 
103-40).
    The session will be held at the Denver Public Library, Conference 
Center B, Level B-2, 1357 Broadway St., Denver, CO 80203-2165 on 
Monday, May 1 from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    The online Federal Register Service offers access to the daily 
issues of the Federal Register by 6 a.m. on the day of publication. All 
notices, rules and proposed rules, Presidential documents, executive 
orders, separate parts, and reader aids are included in the database as 
ASCII text files, with graphics provided in TIFF format. The online 
Federal Register is available via the Internet or as a dial-in service. 
Historical data is available from January 1994 forward.
    Other databases currently available online through GPO Access 
include the Congressional Record; Congressional Record Index, including 
the History of Bills; Congressional Bills; Public Laws; and U.S. Code.
    Individuals interested in attending may reserve a space by 
contacting the Governments Publication Library at the University of 
Colorado, Boulder by telephone: (303) 492-3983 or by contacting John 
Berger, Product Manager at the GPO's Office of Electronic Information 
Dissemination Services, by telephone: (202) 512-1525; by fax: (202) 
512-1262; or by Internet e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2989d9a9cb2979b9681c2c4dc979b9681dc95829ddc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2d8dddadcf2d7dbd6c182849cd7dbd6c19cd5c2dd9cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>. Seating 
reservations will be accepted through Wednesday, April 26, 1995.
Michael F. DiMario,
Public Printer.
[FR Doc. 95-9394 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-02-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0621 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRITTNEY ANN ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 8, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 2 2022

06/02/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0621
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of Planning Force, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Julie Morin, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Julie Morin

Julie Morin

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.2

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION


I, John Page, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LEGALPLAY
     ENTERTAINMENT INC.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is
          being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in
          internal controls; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ John Page                                Date: August 29, 2005
-----------------------------------
John Page
Director / Treasurer
Exhibit 10.36




AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) by and between William J. Mrachek (the “Executive”) and Anika Therapeutics, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Corporation”), dated as of September 10, 2009, is made this 8th day of December, 2010.





RECITALS





WHEREAS the Corporation and the Executive are parties to the Agreement;





AND WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.





NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:




1.            Section 6(a)(i)(A) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:





“(C) Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Date of Termination occurs prior to a Change in Control, payment shall be made in substantially equal installments in accordance with the Company’s payroll practice over 18 months, but amounts shall be increased after the Change in Control to reflect the higher level of severance provided by this Section 6.”




2.            Except as set forth above, all terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1.





ANIKA THERAPEUTICS, INC.BY:
/s/ Charles H. Sherwood/s/ William J. MrachekWilliam J. Mrachek
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROGER WILLIAMSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 128 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11365]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meetings

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the following Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panels.
    These meetings will be open to the public to provide concept review 
of proposed contract or grant solicitations.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Persons listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Panel: Pediatric Cardiovascular Disease.
    Dates of Meeting: June 6, 1996.
    Time of Meeting: 9:00 a.m.
    Place of Meeting: Wood Club Room B, Wood Building, Children's 
Hospital of Philadelphia, South 34th Street, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania.
    Agenda: Identify important areas of research to be included in 
the next solicitation for SCORs in pediatric cardiovascular disease.
    Contact Person: Constance Weinstein, Ph.D, NIH/NHLBI/DHVD, 
Rockledge Center Two, Room 9144, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892-7940, (301) 435-0510.

    Name of Panel: Lung Biology Disease.
    Dates of Meeting: June 10-11, 1996.
    Time of Meeting: 7:30 p.m.
    Place of Meeting: June 10-Ramada Inn, 1775 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852. June 11 (8:00 a.m.)--Prospect Associates, 
1801 Rockville Pike, Suite 500, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Agenda: To identify current issues in basic and clinical topics 
related to several programs in the Division of Lung Disease's Lung 
Biology and Disease Program for future NHLBI-supported research
    Contact Person: Dorothy B. Gail, Ph.D, NIH/NHLBI/DLD, Rockledge 
Center Two, Room. 10018, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-0222.

    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, 
Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases 
Research; and 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 1, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-11365 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
NUMBER 13-22-00211-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

CHRIS HOLT, Appellant,

v.

KIM GRIGG, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 117th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Silva, and Peña 

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña

This matter is before the Court on appellant and appellee’s joint motion for nonsuit and voluntary dismissal of all claims. The parties request a dismissal stating that they

have negotiated a settlement.
2

The Court, having considered the joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion 

should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1) (allowing the Court to “dismiss the 

appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless such disposition would prevent a 

party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled”). Accordingly, we grant 

the motion, and we dismiss the appeal. Costs will be borne by the party incurring the 

same. Because the appeal is dismissed at appellant and appellee’s joint request, no 

motion for rehearing will be entertained.

L. ARON PEÑA JR.

Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

2nd day of February, 2023.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6262
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus COY HAZEL HOWE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CR-01-234, CA-01-3931) Submitted: May 19, 2003 Decided: June 11, 2003 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Coy Hazel Howe, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Coy Hazel Howe seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order denying a motion under § 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Howe has not made the requisite showing. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Iqbal Akhtar v. Leawood HOA, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00694

- CV

Trial court case number: 1053689

Trial court: Co unt y Civil C our t at Law No

. 2 of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellant’s Motion for En Banc Review is denied

.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: February 2 , 2017

*En banc court cons ists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

muiteb ~tate~ QCourt of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI QCircuit

IN RE HARRY SERETTI AND CARL

SCHAUKOWITCH

2013-1010

(Serial No. 11/625,067)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Harry Seretti and Carl Schaukowitch move without

opposition to dismiss this appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Case: 13-1010 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 12/13/2012
IN RE HARRY SERETTI 2

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

DEC 132m2

s21

Issued As A Mandate: ---------

Case: 13-1010 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 12/13/2012
1 The signature line on the request for an appeal was not signed by appel lant and attorneyBryan Adamson signed the requ est as “re viewed i n substan ce.” Rul e 6.1 of the Texas Rules of

Appell ate Proce dure prov ides tha t the atto rney who se name fi rst appea rs on the notice of appeal is lead coun sel. NO. 07-03-0533-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL C MAY 27, 2004

______________________________ IN THE MA

TTER OF T HE MARRI AGE OF KAREN SUE BEDFORD AND STEVEN EDWARD BEDFORD

_________________________________ FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTE R COUNTY; NO. 67,70 1-D; HONO RABLE D ON EMERS ON, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant

Steven E dward Be dford fi le d a “request for an appeal” challenging an agreed final decree of divorce. 1 The clerk’s record was filed on January 21, 2004; however , no reporter’s record was filed. Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on February 20, 2004,2

buthas yet to be filed and no motion for extension of time was filed. By letter dated April 28, 2004, th is Court notified atto rney Brya n Adamson of the missed deadline and al so directed him to reasonably explain the failure to file a brief with a showing that appel lee has notbeen significantly injured by the dela y on or b efore May 10, 2004. Counsel did not respond and the brief remains outstanding. Accordingly, we dismi ss this a ppeal fo r want of pr osecution and failure to comply with an o rder of th is Court. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 42 .3(b) & (c ). Don H. Reavis Justice
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NO EL LIFE

,

Appellant

,

v.

E AST EL PASO VETIRANARY

HOSPITA L

,

Appellee. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 23 6

- C V

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

o f El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2021DCV4356 )

O R D E R

On November 2 3 , 2022 , Appellant filed notice of appeal in the above

- styled and numbered

cause. The notice of appeal is late, but it was filed within fifteen days after the deadline for the

notice of appeal to be filed. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied w hen an

appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by T EX .R.A PP .P.

26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension

of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). However, an appellant must

still provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal before

the Court may accept the appeal. Accordingly, Appellant is ordered to respond in writin g and

provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for filing the notice of appeal late. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 26.3; Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 617. The explanation is due to be filed

no later than December 3 , 2022 . If Appellant fails to comply wi th this order, the appeal is subject

to dismissal without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 3 rd d ay of November

, 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report ofThe SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, for the period ended October 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Bert B. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Bert B. Young       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Bert B. Young           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |

 
| Date: | October 26, 2005 |
|-------|-----------------------|

 

----