alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE  SHEETS OF NORTH BAY  BANCORP AS OF  DECEMBER  31, 1999 AND 1998 AND THE
RELATED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF INCOME,CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS'  EQUITY AND
CASH FLOWS FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS INTHE PERIOD ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1999
<CASH> 8,466
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS> 100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD> 1,500
<TRADING-ASSETS> 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE> 55,264
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING> 1,390
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET> 1,390
<LOANS> 122,153
<ALLOWANCE> 1,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 197,106
<DEPOSITS> 172,380
<SHORT-TERM> 5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER> 1,636
<LONG-TERM> 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY> 0
<PREFERRED> 0
<COMMON> 12,893
<OTHER-SE> 5,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 197,106
<INTEREST-LOAN> 9,819
<INTEREST-INVEST> 3,671
<INTEREST-OTHER> 199
<INTEREST-TOTAL> 13,689
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT> 4,167
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 4,364
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET> 9,324
<LOAN-LOSSES> 240
<SECURITIES-GAINS> 9
<EXPENSE-OTHER> 6,496
<INCOME-PRETAX> 4,365
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY> 4,365
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 2,715
<EPS-BASIC> 1.70
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL> 8.01
<LOANS-NON> 0
<LOANS-PAST> 0
<LOANS-TROUBLED> 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM> 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN> 1,752
<CHARGE-OFFS> 24
<RECOVERIES> 19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE> 1,987
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC> 1,987
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN> 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED> 0




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
American Bio Medica Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-3 (File No.
333-89716), Form S-3 (File No. 333-70220), Form S-3 (File No. 333-16535), Form
S-8 (File No. 333-83684), Form S-8 (File No. 333-91025) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-19203) of our report dated June 20, 2001 (with respect to Note B, July 23,
2001) on our audit of the financial statements of the Company as of and for the
year ended April 30, 2001, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB. In addition, we consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in the registration statements in the above Forms S-3.

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has
experienced recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.


/s/ Eisner LLP

Eisner LLP
(formerly Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP)

New York, New York
March 27, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Realty Investors, Inc. (the Company), on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Abney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  |                                                                                                                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    STEVEN A. ABNEY
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Steven A. Abney Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive
Officer)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 12-1697

_________________

IN RE: GRAND JURY

JOHN DOE1; JOHN DOE 2; ABC CORPORATION,

 Appellants

_________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Grand Jury Action No. 2-09-gj-00006)

District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III

_________________

Present: AMBRO, HARDIMAN, and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

Respectfully,

Clerk/tmk

_______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________

The Precedential Opinion filed May 24, 2012, is hereby VACATED. Having granted 

panel rehearing on July 19, 2012, this matter was reconsidered and consolidated for new 

disposition. That Precedential Opinion will be filed forthwith. 

By the Court,

 Circuit Judge

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro

Dated: December 11, 2012

tmk/cc: 

Frank P. Cihlar, Esq.

Gregory V. Davis, Esq.
Samuel R. Lyons, Esq.

Alexander P. Robbins, Esq.

Stephen R. LaCheen, Esq.

Ian M. Comisky, Esq.

Matthew D. Lee, Esq.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1069]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Department 
of Energy/Los Alamos National Laboratory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EMSSAB), Los Alamos National Laboratory.

DATES: Tuesday, February 13, 1996: 6:30 pm-9:30 pm; 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm 
(public comment session).

ADDRESSES: San Ildefonso Gym, Route 5, San Ildefonso, New Mexico 87501.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lisa Roybal, EMSSAB, Los Alamos 
National Laboratory, Northern New Mexico Community College, 1002 Onate 
Street, Espanola, NM 87352, in New Mexico call (800)753-8970, or out-
of-state call (505)753-8970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose of the Board

    The purpose of the Advisory Board is to make recommendations to DOE 
and its regulators in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

Tuesday, February 13, 1996
    6:30 PM Call to Order and Welcome
    7:00 PM Input from the Public
    8:00 PM DOE/LANL Environmental Restoration Briefing
    8:30 PM Sub-Committee Reports
    9:30 PM Adjourn

Public Participation

    The meeting is open to the public. Written statements may be filed 
with the Committee either before or after the meeting. Individuals who 
wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should contact 
Ms. Lisa Roybal, at the telephone number listed above. Requests must be 
received 5 days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be 
made to include the presentation in the agenda. The Designated Federal 
Official is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.

Minutes

    The minutes of this meeting will be available for public review and 
copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 1E-190, 
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585 
between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal holidays. 
Minutes will also be available by writing to Herman Le-Doux, Department 
of Energy, Los Alamos Area Office, 528 35th Street, Los Alamos, NM 
87185-5400.

    Issued at Washington, DC on January 19, 1996.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-1069 Filed 1-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christian NEAL, Appellant. Christian NEAL, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 65611 & 67318.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 12, 1996.

*301Raymund J. Capelovitch, Office of the State Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

KAROHL, Judge.

Defendant was jury tried, convicted and sentenced on charges of robbery in the second degree, a class B felony, and willfully failing to appear, a class D felony. He filed a Rule 29.15 motion which was denied after an evidentiary hearing. He appeals both judgments.

Appeal of the Rule 29.15 denial of relief is abandoned where no point of error was briefed. *Nelson v. State,*818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991).

The direct appeal issue claims plain error because of the admission of hearsay consisting of a statement contained in a police report. A friend of defendant told a police officer: (1) she had loaned her car to defendant; (2) after its return she found a chain on the floor board of her car; (3) she asked defendant about it and he told her “it’s probably no good”; and, (4) she had thrown it away. Defense counsel objected, not on grounds of hearsay, but because of an incorrect reading of the statement in the report. The trial court sustained that objection. Immediately thereafter the statement in the police report was accurately read for the benefit of the jury. It contained substantially the same information regarding the lending of the car, finding a chain, a conversation with defendant, and disposition of the chain.

Under rare circumstances, not applicable here, the failure to object to hearsay testimony may be a matter of plain error. As a matter of fact no plain error occurred. First, the entire subject matter of the hearsay statement was known to defendant. Each event regarding the robbery charge involved the defendant who borrowed the car and conversed with his friend. Second, the state also offered evidence of a statement made by defendant to detectives: “[Y]ou don’t need to put me in a lineup. They’re going to pick me out anyway. I took the lady’s necklace. I have a drug problem and I need some help.” In the face of his admissions and the absence of objection there was no error, plain or otherwise, and no possibility of any manifest injustice.

We affirm.

REINHARD, P.J., and GRIMM, J., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

                         FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION

                                529 Fifth Avenue
                               New York, NY 10017

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 April 26, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the requirements under Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation
S-X, Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation ("Finlay Jewelry") has obtained a letter of
representation from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") stating that the audit of
Finlay Jewelry's consolidated financial statements, as of and for the fiscal
year ended February 2, 2002, was subject to Andersen's quality control system
for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance
that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards,
that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit
and availability of national office consultation. Andersen also stated that the
availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
its audit of Finlay Jewelry.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation


                                            /s/ Bruce E. Zurlnick

                                            Bruce E. Zurlnick
                                            Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11319]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1109-DR]


Indiana; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Indiana, (FEMA-1109-DR), dated April 2, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 26, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Indiana, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 2, 1996:

    The counties of Clay, Franklin, Parke, Perry, Montgomery, and 
Switzerland for reimbursement for the costs of equipment, contracts, 
and personnel overtime that are required to clear one lane in each 
direction along snow emergency routes (or select primary roads in 
those communities without such designated roadways), and routes 
necessary to allow the passage of emergency vehicles to hospitals, 
nursing homes, and other critical facilities.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-11319 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136176 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 136176 COA: 274614 Wayne CC: 06-000233-01 RAPHAEL FERGUSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 12, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David Johnson, the Chief Executive Officer, and Tom Mayenknecht, Secretary and Treasurer, of Park Place Energy Corp. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ David JohnsonDavid JohnsonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and a director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:  May 8, 2009
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Tom MayenknechtTom MayenknechtSecretary, Treasurer and a director 
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  May 8, 2009         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Park Place Energy Corp. and will be retained by Park Place Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Frontier Beverage Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Anthony Peppers, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony Peppers


Anthony Peppers


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


November 12, 2010





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marie White, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Orleans County Court, Miles, J.—attempted assault, second degree.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
#### Esther SIGAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Echeal SIGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 69011.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

June 18, 1996.

Rehearing Denied July 24, 1996.

*188Harvey J. Schramm, Brentwood, for Appellant.

Robert J. Schaeffer, Clayton, for Respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P. J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ. .

PER CURIAM.

Esther Sigan, widow, brought action alleging fraud of marital rights in connection with her husband’s transfer of assets before his death to Echeal Sigan, his son from a former marriage. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of widow and son appeals. Two motions were taken with the case. Widow’s motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 84.04(d) is granted. Widow’s motion to strike son’s suggestions in opposition to the motion to dismiss is denied. We decline to award costs and attorney fees to widow.

In his first point relied on, son contends “[t]he trial court erred in ordering summary judgment based on fraud when there were, prima facie, several genuine issues of material fact.” Widow correctly points out this point violates Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04(d). Rule 84.04(d) requires that a point relied on “state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous.... ” Additionally, Rule 84.13(a) states, “allegations of error not briefed or not properly briefed shall not be considered in any civil appeal....”

The three components of a point relied on are: (1) a concise statement of the challenged ruling of the trial court; (2) the rule of law which the trial court should have applied; and (8) the evidentiary basis upon which the asserted rule is applicable. *State ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Delmar Gardens of Chesterfield, Inc.,*872 S.W.2d 178, 184 (Mo.App. E.D.1994).

Son has failed to state wherein and why the trial court erred and has only set out an abstract statement of law without showing how it relates to any action or ruling of the court.

In son’s second point relied on, he contends:

> The trial court erred in ignoring the false and fraudulent pleading of [widow’s] attorney on the central issue of the litigation. Further, the trial court erred in ignoring the uneontroverted perjury of [widow] on the central issue of the case, both in her sworn answers to Interrogatory No. 14, and in her deposition page 45. Equity courts, even more than other courts, historically require the plaintiff to have “clean hands.”

This point also does not comply with Rule 84.04(d). The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly Report of Derby Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: October 21, 2010 /s/Frank Pioppi     Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 20519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-11266]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP91-47-017]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 1, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 26, 1996, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) notified the Commission that it made Billing 
Adjustments to its former RQ and CD customers, in accordance with 
Section 20(f) of the General Terms and Conditions of National's FERC 
Gas Tariff.
    Under Section 20, National is required to make any Billing 
Adjustments caused by the reallocation of take-or-pay (TOP) charges 
under the Winter Requirement Quantity allocation method within sixty 
(60) days of a final Commission Order. National states that this 
Billing Adjustment reflects charges or refunds caused by the 
reallocation of TOP charges from Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation.
    National states that copies of the letter and the attached 
worksheets were sent to each of National's former RQ and CD customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure 18 CFR 385.211. All such protests must 
be filed on or before May 8, 1996. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-11266 Filed 5-6-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M