alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19782-19783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9816]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Job Training Partnership Act: Native American Employment and 
Training Council; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and section 401(h)(1) of the Job Training 
Partnership Act (JTPA), as amended (29 U.S.C. 1671(h)(1), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council.

    Time and Date: The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. on May 18, 
1995, and continue until close of business that day, and will 
[[Page 19783]] reconvene at 9:00 a.m. on May 19, 1995, and adjourn 
at close of business that day. From 3:30 to 5:00 p.m. on March 18 
will be reserved for participation and presentations by members of 
the public.
    Place: Heart Room, Radisson Inn Bismarck, 800 South Third 
Street, Bismarck, North Dakota.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public. Persons with 
disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact the 
undersigned no less than 10 days before the meeting.
    Matters To Be Considered: The agenda will focus on the following 
topics: automated reporting pilot, communications network, 
nominations for expiring memberships, program evaluation, proposed 
revised regulations, Congressional activities, and establishment of 
subcommittees.
    Contact Person for More Information: Thomas M. Dowd, Chief, 
Division of Indian and Native American Programs, Employment and 
Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Room N-4641, Washington, D.C. 20210. Telephone: 202-
219-8502 (this is not a toll-free number).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of April, 1995.
Doug Ross,
Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 95-9816 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6103

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5518 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require individuals the 

choice to opt in to enrollment in employer group waiver plans under 

Medicare Advantage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. TORRES of New York (for himself and Ms. MALLIOTAKIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 

individuals the choice to opt in to enrollment in employer 

group waiver plans under Medicare Advantage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Medicare 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5518 IH

1 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS; PURPOSE. 

2 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con3 gress that seniors have the right to choose between tradi4 tional Medicare or Medicare Advantage. 

5 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to ensure 

6 that: 

7 (1) Public and private employers are prohibited 

8 from involuntarily forcing seniors to shift from 

9 Medicare to Medicare Advantage. 

10 (2) Employers are required to offer an opt-in 

11 option to shift from traditional Medicare to Medicare 

12 Advantage. 

13 (3) If an employee or retiree does not respond 

14 to the opt-in ask, that shall be viewed as opting out 

15 from shifting to Medicare Advantage. This requires 

16 the employer to continue paying for their traditional 

17 Medicare coverage. 

18 SEC. 3. REQUIRING OPT-IN FOR ENROLLMENT IN EM19 PLOYER GROUP WAIVER PLANS UNDER 

20 MEDICARE ADVANTAGE. 

21 Section 1857(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

22 1395w–27(i)) is amended— 

23 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, subject to 

24 paragraph (3),’’ after ‘‘the Secretary may’’; 

25 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, subject to 

26 paragraph (3),’’ after ‘‘the Secretary may’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5518 IH

1 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

2 paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(3) OPT-IN REQUIREMENT.—For plan years 

4 beginning on or after the date of the enactment of 

5 the Right to Medicare Act, with respect to an MA 

6 plan described in paragraph (1) or paragraph (2), 

7 the Secretary may not waive or modify any require8 ment that an individual described in either such 

9 paragraph affirmatively elect to enroll in such plan 

10 before such individual is so enrolled.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>

     In connection with the quarterly report of New Taohuayuan Culture Tourism
Co., Ltd., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") Cai Danmei, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the company.


May 14, 2009                     By: /s/ Cai Danmei
                                     ------------------------------------
                                     Cai Danmei, Principal Executive and
                                     Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Aviza Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  theaccompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 28,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periodspresented therein.

 

 

Date:February 11, 2008

 
|   | By:    |      /s/ Patrick C. O’Connor |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Patrick C. O’Connor                                   |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 13, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 336-690-6217.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, July 13, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Conchata Holloway. For more information please contact Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 336-690-6217, or write TAP Office, 4905 Koger Boulevard, Greensboro, NC 27407-2734 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: June 4, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-12098 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antonio GREEN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 68468.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Dec. 19, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.

Murry A. Marks, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., and SIMON and BLACKMAR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Antonio Green appeals the judgment and sentence entered on charges of possession of burglar’s tools in violation of § 569.180 RSMo 1984 after the sentencing court denied his motion for leave to withdraw his guilty plea. He was sentenced to a term of three years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George MORGAN, Appellant. George MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 63216, 66961.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

June 27, 1995.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of two counts of sodomy and one count of rape and his sentence as a prior offender to consecutive fifteen year prison terms for each count. He also appeals from denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without evidentiary hearing. No error of law appears, the verdict is supported by the evidence, and the issues raised by the defendant are without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment on the rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears, and an opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgments on direct appeal and on Rule 29.15 appeal are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b), 84.16(b).
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-116687, 333-35538 and 333-105263)
of PEC Solutions, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

|March 16, 2005 |  | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit32**

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

TerryG. Roussel and Sharon C. Kaiser, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of CornerstoneCore Properties REIT, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the six-month period ended June 30,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of  CornerstoneCore Properties REIT, Inc.
|                       |   |  /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                              |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 11, 2006 |   | Terry G. Roussel  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

 
|                              |   |  /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                               |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  August  11, 2006 |   | Sharon C. Kaiser

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                     AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 23, 1999


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1999-12


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), Subservicer for BA Mortgage, LLC, successor in interest by merger
of NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), the Servicer in connection
with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-12, do hereby certify that
(i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year and of its performance under this Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made
under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under the
Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                    By:
                                       ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv M61
#### Cheri HOLLIDAY, Appellant, v. Gerald LOVIN, Jr., Respondent.

No. 65626.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 27, 1994.

Charles P. Todt, Clayton, for appellant.

E. Darrell Davis Jr., St. Charles, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cheri Holliday, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis granting respondent’s, Gerald Lovin, Jr.’s, motion to modify, awarding child support and attorneys fees. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Kobex Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Samuel Yik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Samuel YikSamuel YikChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting and Financial OfficerMarch 26, 2010




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial
condition and results of the Company as of and for the
period covered by this Report.
 By:
    /s/ William J. McGurkWilliam J. McGurkMay 11, 2009
    
    President and Chief Executive
OfficerBy:
    /s/ John T. LundJohn T. LundMay 11, 2009
    
    SVP, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6789

GREGORY C. KRUG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VICTOR LORANTH, in his individual capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-01829-DCN)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory C. Krug, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory C. Krug seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying 

relief on Krug’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six 

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 

(1971). We remand for consideration of whether reopening of the 

appeal period is merited.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, 

parties are accorded 60 days after the entry of the district 

court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. 

P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal 

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal 

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a 

notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on 

January 6, 2015. Krug filed his notice of appeal on May 14, 

2015.* Krug’s notice of appeal is clearly untimely. However, 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), the district court may reopen the 

 

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on Krug’s notice of appeal is the earliest date it 

could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 

487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988).
3

time to file an appeal if: (1) the moving party did not receive 

notice of entry of judgment within 21 days after entry; (2) the 

motion is filed within 180 days of entry of judgment or within 

14 days of receiving notice from the court, whichever is 

earlier; and (3) no party would be prejudiced.

In his notice of appeal, Krug stated that he did not 

receive notice of the district court’s order dismissing his 

action until the court mailed him a copy on May 6, 2015, in 

response to Krug’s April 30 letter of inquiry as to the status 

of his case. Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of 

permitting the district court to determine whether Krug’s 

notice of appeal should be construed as a motion to reopen the 

appeal period, and if so, whether reopening is merited. The 

record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for 

further consideration.

REMANDED
**Exhibit23.1**

** **

Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheBoard of Directors and Stockholders

TheSCO Group, Inc.:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-43822, 333-97865, 333-100105, 333-124101, and 333-124102on Form S-8 of The SCO Group, Inc. of our report dated January 23,2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of The SCO Group, Inc.and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2005, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cashflows for the year then ended, and the financial statement schedule forthe related period, which report appears in the October 31, 2005 annualreport on Form 10-K of The SCO Group, Inc.

 
| /s/ Tanner LC         |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
| Salt Lake City, Utah  |
| January 23, 2006 |

 

----