alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5267 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5267

    To prohibit Federal funds from being awarded or otherwise made 
       available to the Fulton County District Attorney's Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 25, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit Federal funds from being awarded or otherwise made 
       available to the Fulton County District Attorney's Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Withholding Investments from Lawless 
Litigators In States Act'' or the ``WILLIS Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING WITH RESPECT TO FULTON COUNTY 
              DISTRICT ATTORNEY.

    (a) Prohibition on Federal Funding.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, no Federal funds may be awarded or otherwise made 
available to the Fulton County District Attorney's Office.
    (b) Rescission and Repayment of Federal Funding.--The unobligated 
balances of all amounts allocated for or otherwise made available to 
the Fulton County District Attorney's Office is hereby rescinded, and 
the Attorney General shall take such steps as may be necessary and 
practicable to require the Fulton County District Attorney's Office to 
reimburse the Federal Government for all amounts expended for such 
Office after the date of January 1, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7518

Global Trade Works, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 27, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00058

- CV

DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. ; Bexar County Emergency Service

District No. 5; and Bexar County Emergency Service District No. 10, Appellants

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 26125

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee, the City of San Antonio’ s
, brief was originally due on June 25, 2021. Appellee has been granted one previous extension until July 26, 2021. O n July 26, 2021, appellee filed an unopposed motion requesting a thir t y

- day extension of time in which to file its brief. The motion

is GRA NT E D and appellee is ORDERED to file its brief no later than August 25, 2021

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN W ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of July, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Cou rt
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARCOS GONZALEZ ROMERO, a.k.a.

Marco Romero Gonzalez, a.k.a. Guadalupe

Ramirez, a.k.a. Tortas,

 Defendant - Appellant,

No. 10-50586

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00445-DSF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Marcos Gonzalez Romero appeals from the 291-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

Organizations conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 846, § 1962(d); conspiracy to

FILED

JAN 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50586

possess with intent to distribute and distribute methamphetamine, in violation 21

U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1); and possession with intent to distribute a controlled

substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez Romero’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Gonzalez Romero waived his right to appeal his sentence with the exception

of conditions of certain supervised release. Our independent review of the record

pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable

grounds for relief as to defendant’s conviction or the conditions of supervised

release, and indicates that the appeal waiver is valid. We dismiss the appeal of the

sentence in part. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.

2000). 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ST Online Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott Pedersen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 14th day of August, 2006.



| | SCOTT PEDERSEN                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott Pedersen                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
exv4w6





Exhibit 4.6





	THIS WARRANT WILL BE VOID IF NOT EXERCISED PRIOR
TO 5:00 P.M. NEW YORK CITY TIME, MAY, 2015 WARRANTS
W REGENERX BIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
WARRANT CERTIFICATE CUSIP 75886X 11 6






 








 




SUBSCRIPTION FORM

To Be Executed by the Registered Holder in Order to Exercise Warrants


     The undersigned Registered Holder
irrevocably elects to exercise                  
    Warrants
represented by this Warrant Certificate, and to purchase the shares of Common Stock issuable upon
the exercise of such Warrants, and requests that Certificates for such shares shall be issued in
the name of


 

(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND ADDRESS)


 



 



 

(SOCIAL SECURITY OR TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)


and be delivered to


 

(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND ADDRESS)


 



and, if such number of Warrants shall not be all the Warrants evidenced by this Warrant
Certificate, that a new Warrant Certificate for the balance of such Warrants be registered in the
name of, and delivered to, the Registered Holder at the address stated below:



	 	 	 	 	 

	Dated:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	(Signature)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	(Address)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	(Tax Identification Number)





Signature Guaranteed:         
                      
         


THE SIGNATURE TO THE SUBSCRIPTION FORM MUST CORRESPOND TO THE NAME WRITTEN UPON THE
FACE OF THIS
WARRANT CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
WHATSOEVER, AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A COMMERCIAL BANK OR TRUST COMPANY OR A MEMBER FIRM OF THE
AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, PACIFIC STOCK EXCHANGE OR CHICAGO STOCK
EXCHANGE.


ASSIGNMENT

To Be Executed by the Registered Holder in Order to Assign Warrants


FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
                                                                                                                         
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 

(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND ADDRESS)


 



 



 

(SOCIAL SECURITY OR TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)


and be delivered to


 

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS)



                                                            
of the Warrants represented by this Warrant Certificate, and hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint



 

Attorney to transfer this Warrant Certificate on the books of the Company, with full power of
substitution in the premises.



	 	 	 	 	 

	Dated:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Signature





Signature Guaranteed:            
                        
     



THE SIGNATURE TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE SUBSCRIPTION FORM MUST CORRESPOND TO THE NAME WRITTEN
UPON THE FACE OF THIS WARRANT CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR
ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER, AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A COMMERCIAL BANK OR TRUST COMPANY OR A MEMBER
FIRM OF THE AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, PACIFIC STOCK EXCHANGE OR CHICAGO
STOCK EXCHANGE.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 23, 1996)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 18043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10175]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 23, 1996 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 18043]]


                Proclamation 6887 of April 19, 1996

                
Jewish Heritage Week, 1996

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                The Jewish experience in America has been a mutually 
                rewarding one for this country and for the Jewish 
                people. Jewish Americans have made great contributions 
                in such fields as the arts and sciences, business, 
                government, law and medicine, enriching America's 
                heritage with the resonant tradition of an ancient 
                people. And America, for its part, has been a land of 
                opportunity for its Jewish citizens.

                In many ways, the Jewish experience is unique, 
                freighted with the anguish of frequent persecution, but 
                ennobled by an unyielding spirit that has always found 
                a way to turn darkness into light. In the crucible of 
                sorrow, the Jewish people have reaffirmed, time and 
                again, the basic human values of faith, community, 
                justice, and hope.

                On the tolerant soil of American democracy, the Jewish 
                people have flourished. We will be forever grateful for 
                the remarkable contributions of our Jewish citizens, 
                and it is fitting that we set aside a week to give 
                thanks for their inestimable gifts and to honor the 
                traditions of their remarkable religion and heritage.

                NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the 
                United States of America, by virtue of the authority 
                vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United 
                States, do hereby proclaim April 21 through April 28, 
                1996, as Jewish Heritage Week. I call upon the people 
                of the United States to observe this week with 
                appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                nineteenth day of April, in the year of our Lord 
                nineteen hundred and ninety-six, and of the 
                Independence of the United States of America the two 
                hundred and twentieth.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

[FR Doc. 96-10175
Filed 4-22-96; 11:21 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Immureboost, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Burke, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date July 8, 2008   /s/ Steve Burke Name: Steve Burke Title: Chief Financial Officer Chief Executive Officer
================================================================================
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scala  Minerals, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for   the   period   ended  December 31, 2006 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on   the   date   hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, in the capacities and   on   the   dates   indicated  below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted    pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 14, 2007

/s/ Elena Krioukova
-------------------------------------------
Elena Krioukova, Principal Financial Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-14-00670- CV Mary E. Allen, Appellant

v. Wells Branch Self

Storage, A ppellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 2 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 14- 0072 35, H ONO RAB LE ERIC SH EP P ERD, JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R P ER CURIAM

Appellant Mary E. Allen filed a motion challeng ing the trial court’s order sustaining
a contest to her aff

idavit of indige nce. Having revie wed the motion and the rec ord from the hear ing 1
on the contest, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse i t s d i s cretion. As such, we deny 2 appellant’ s motion. 3

I t is ordere d on Dec ember 10, 2014.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield
See Tex. R. App. P . 20.1(j)(1)
. 1 See S carbrough v. Purser , No. 03-13-00025- CV, 2013 Tex. App. L EXI S 2446, at *1-2 2 (Tex. App.—Austin Fe b. 27, 2013, order ) (per curia m) (appl y i n g abuse-of-discr etion standard to revie w of trial court’s order sustaining indige nce contest); Kastner v. Texas Bd. of Law Exam’ rs , No. 03-08-00515- CV, 2 0 0 9 T ex . App. L EXI S 6381, at *5 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug
. 12, 2009, no pet.) (me m. op.) (same ). See Tex. R. App. P . 20.1(j)(4)
. 3
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: AXCESS INTER NATIONAL, INC., Appellant

______________________

2016

- 1430

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/012,363.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ICHAEL J. M ARCIN , Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant.

P HILIP J. W ARRICK , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee . Also represented by

N ATHAN K. K ELLEY

, B ENJAMIN T. H ICKMAN

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (O’M ALLEY

, R EYNA

, and C HEN

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 3, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

176 

CA 13-00950 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

EDWARD S. KALFAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

TRACIE LYNN KALFAS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (PAUL V. WEBB, III, OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

LENHARDT & SMITH, WILLIAMSVILLE (CLAYTON J. LENHARDT OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County

(James H. Dillon, J.), entered July 23, 2012 in a divorce action. The

judgment, among other things, dissolved the marriage between the

parties and distributed the marital debts and assets. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme

Court.

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David LEE, Appellant.

No. WD 52229.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 26, 1996.

*38Rosemary E. Pereival, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Christine M. Blegen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and SPINDEN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

David Lee appeals from his conviction by jury of attempted kidnapping, § 564.0111 and § 565.110, armed criminal action, § 571.015, and four counts of indecent exposure, § 566.130. The trial court found Lee to be a prior and persistent offender under §§ 558.016, 557.036.4, and 558.019, and sentenced Lee to a one year term of imprisonment for each indecent exposure count, seventeen years for attempted kidnapping, and seventeen years for armed criminal action. These sentences were to be served concurrently. On appeal, Lee challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction for attempted kidnapping and, consequently, armed criminal action.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise noted.
**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Charles Cardona, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of AdZone Research,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this annual
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




*/s/
              Charles Cardona*Charles
              CardonaChief
                Executive Officer, acting Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
                Officer
              July
                13, 2007